1993-27 RESOLUTION NO. 93-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TTM-88-02R1 (TENTATIVE MAP 14078), E-93-04,
V-93-01 AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, the applicant, Barney Karger, has applied for approval of a revised
tentative tract map, dividing 9.2 acres into 15 homesites and one water reservoir site; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on June 17, 1993; and
WHEREAS, this project was continued to the July 1, 1993 Planning Commission
Meeting, which was canceled; and
WHEREAS, this project was continued again to the July 15, 1993 Planning
Commission Meeting and was reviewed; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article
6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment B) and said Negative
Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
WHEREAS, at this July 15, 1993 hearing, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of TTM-88-02R1 and the Negative Declaration to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by City Council on August
12, 1993 regarding approval of TTM-88-02R1 and the Negative Declaration.
� 7
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby
resolve as follows:
Section 1. Environmental Review - An environmental review of TFM-88-02R1 has
been conducted and noticed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; that
based upon review, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace finds that the proposed
subdivision will not have a significant effect upon the environment.
Section 2. Findin s - This City Council does hereby make the following findings
relative to the approval of TTM-88-02R1:
1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development.
2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat.
4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not
likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a
wildland conflagration.
5. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the proposed subdivision,its design, density and type of development and
improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the regulations of the Development
Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Negative Declaration is hereby adopted and
that TTM-88-02R1 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
1. An Erosion Control Plan was submitted and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 15, 1993. It shall be
installed by September 30, 1993, prior to this year's rainy season. Otherwise,
the approval of this map is null and void.
2. The applicant shall construct a six foot high solid decorative block wall around
the perimeter. Additionally, around the wall, there shall be high trees and
�' densely landscaped materials to properly shield reservoir site from public view
as much as possible. These materials to be approved by the Planning.
Director prior to final inspection of block wall. Landscaping to be maintained
by property owners of Lots 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 respectively. The applicant
shall be allowed to construct a chain link fence on the east side of the
reservoir site only, Lot A, instead of a block wall, until the development to
the east takes place. At that time, the six foot high solid decorative block wall
shall be completed on the east side of the reservoir site, Lot A.
3. The reservoir tank shall not extend higher than six feet above the required six
foot high block wall. At the time of entire structure repainting by property
owner of Lot A, a color sample shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for their review and approval. The intent is to avoid a negative
visual impact or obtrusiveness to surrounding property owners.
4. A Landscaping and Lighting District shall be established for the purpose of
providing adequate lighting and maintenance of public areas including median
with palm tree areas and Lot 'B" west of "A" Court.
5. An overall design program shall be approved by the Planning Director. Such
program shall include, but not be limited to:
* Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of custom
homes;
* Location of buildable pads for each individual lot; and
* Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements.
6. Appropriate CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Community
Development Director and City Attorney. Said CC&Rs shall include the
approved design program required in Condition No. 5, wall and slope
maintenance as noted in Condition #2 and 16, DWR and SCE easements to
be clearly defined on respective lots 4,5,6,7,9 and 10. CCR's shall be recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder.
7. All the conditions as recommended by the Department of
Engineering/Building and Safety in their memorandum dated June 4, 1993,
attached as Attachment C.
8. All the conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden's
Department in their memorandum dated April 15, 1993 and amended My 11,
1993; attached as Attachment D.
9. All the conditions as recommended by the State of California Department of.
Water Resources in their memorandum dated June 12, 1993, attached as
Attachment E.
10. All the conditions as recommended by the Riverside Highland Water
Company in their letter dated May 5, 1993, attached as Attachment F.
11. Recommendation by the State of California Department of Agriculture in
their letter dated April 16, 1993, attached as Attachment G.
12. Compliance with the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District for the
Erosion Control Plan.
13. Payment of Traffic Mitigation Fee wherever the fee is installed in proportion
to amount of trips generated by the development.
14. In accordance with Subregional TCM Implementation Program, wherever
adopted and installed by the City, the applicant (property owner) shall have
one of the following applicable measures installed, such as on-site pedestrian
walkways and bicycle facilities to connect each building in the development
to public streets (i.e. Mt. Vernon Avenue/Barton Road bicycle lane), or
contribute to a shuttle that accesses transit facilities, or contribute to the
development of a telecommunication center, or contribute to transit
improvements.
15. This Tentative Tract Map supersedes any previous map applications for this
property, both parcel and tentative tract maps.
16. Block wall surrounding reservoir shall be built within Lot "A" and
maintenance of wall to be the responsibility of owner of Lot "A". All graffiti
removal from block wall in Lot A shall be the responsibility of Lot A.property
owner. Block wall within Lot "A" shall be reflected on tentative map prior to
City Council Meeting of August 12, 1993.
17. Pull appropriate demolition permits for demolishing and removal of all
irrigation structures or facilities.
18. Plans shall be amended to clearly distinguish front and rear yard setbacks for
Lots 1,2,3, 9 and 10, clarification of lot accesses and clearly define easement
J locations.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a regular meeting held the 12th day of August, 1993.
ATTEST:
AA
City clerk of the City of Grand Terrace ayor the Ci of Gran Terrace
and of the City Council thereof. and o he City Council thereof.
I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 12th day of August, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Carlstrom, Hilkey and Singl.ey; Mayor Pro Tem
Christianson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Matteson
ABSTAIN:None
City Clerk Z/
APPROVED AS TO FORM
John Harper
City Attorney
peoc,T�)' )
Planning
----)rERR c NEGATIVE DECLARATION Department
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
TTM-88-02R1 and E-93-04, An application for a Tentative Tract Map 14078 subdivision
revision for a 15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone.
APPLICANT:
W.J. Mc Keever Engineering Inc., Dennis Stafford
Barney Karger, Property Owner.
LOCATION:
Northside of Pico Street at Blue Mountain Avnue
APN# 277-181-01
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
V
41
Patrizia Materassi, Date
Planning Director
City of Grand Terrace
Attachment B
22795 Barton Road• Grand Terrace. California 92324-5295 • (909) 824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attention: Patrizia Matdrassi Planning Director, 714-824-6621
3. Date of Environmental Assessment:
4. Agency Requiring Assessment: City of Grand Terrace
7�FAJTATIVE —/-;ZAP AlgP 1-5109"6
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Q1n i5W n ED
Z07 ,
6. Location of Proposal: 2iCn -5�TR8E7/r3�uc��o�ra-�•4ii�G�u�T
' GP'An1[D r1c 114967, ILA
II. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.)
Yes Maw No
1. Earth. Will proposal result.in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or
in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering.
of this soil?
C. Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features? �
1
Yes Maybe No
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any substantial increase in wind
or water erosion of soils,
either on or off site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
situation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or N
similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
C. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
.:range in climate, whether
locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial changes in currents,
or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters? X.
2
Yes Maybe No
b. Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface
runoff?
C. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or.turbidity?
f Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? N
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
tom' through interception of an aquifer
cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available-for public water
supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or uual waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass. crops and aquatic plants)? X
3
b. Reduction of the numbers of any Yes Maybe No
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing X
species?
d. Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
C. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife Habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
T
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
4
Yes . Maybe No
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of ate. explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population
of an area?
12. Housing. Will the,proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
D. Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c_ Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? _
5
Yes Maybe No
d. Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterbome, rail
or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
14. Public Services. Will the proposal
have substantial effect upon, or result
in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? x
b. Police protection? X
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts
of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? �.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
6
Yes Mgybe No
/ a. Power or natural gas? X
b. Communications systems? X
C. Water? X_
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal? N.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view? N
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities? Y�
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
ti
7
Yes Maybe No
b. Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
or object?
C. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area?
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory? N
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
C. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulativelv considerable?
(A project's impact on two or
8
Yes Maybe No
more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant_) x 2
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
Environmental Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _
I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Patrizia Materassi
Planning Director
r"
Date Signature
For City of Grand Terrace
9
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
lb. Earth. Will the proposal result in disruptions, displacement, compaction or
overcovering of this soil?
Yes. However, the grading plan requires review and approval of the City Engineer
and the Planning Director to avoid any negative impacts on the environment.
3b,f. Water. Will the proposal result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
rate and amount of surface run-off?
Yes. The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovering of
a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing.proper
drainage methods and implementation of an erosion control plan by September,
1993, prior to the rainy season, reviewed, approved and monitored by the Building
and Engineering Department. The erosion control plan and future site development
will significantly improve the current drainage situation.
6a. Noise. Will the proposal result in increases in existing noise levels?
J Yes. The existing noise levels may increase as a result of the development of
residential uses in an area that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the
allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan
and monitored within the City Noise Ordinance by the code Enforcement Officer.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Yes. :.:e existing land use will change from vacant land to single family rec-diential
uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan and monitored by the Planning
Department.
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Yes. As the project is a residential development which will draw additional
population to the immediate area within the parameters of this project increasing the
location and density of the population consistent with the City's General Plan.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Yes. This project subdivides tracts which will create a demand for additional
residential housing consistent with the City's General Plan.
13a. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
Maybe. The project will eventually become a residential development, thus creating
increased vehicular movement to the existing traffic circulation pattern. The
Tentative Tract Map will make available 15 residences. The CUT thresholds for
TIAs are 250 dwelling units. The project will not generate enough vehicle trips to
require a TIA nor exceed any of the Grand Terrace residential thresholds of 100
dwelling units. However, this project will be conditioned to pay a traffic mitigation
fee per trip added to the traffic system.
16e. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial
alterations to the storm water drainage?
Maybe. In terms of storm water drainage. Pavement of property may increase
volumes of storm water run-off. Yet, proposed retention basins may hold oil
sediments and slow down speed of water. As mitigation measure, the project is
conditioned to provide adequate drainage facilities to accept drainage from Blue
Mountain and properties to the East. Mitigation measure may include requirement
for drainage study.
21c. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively considerable?
Yes. Additional traffic will cumulatively add to Barton Road_,volume and affect
service levels of major city intersections, therefor,-; mitigation measure is required.
Project is conditioned to pay traffic improvement fee wherever it is installed
proportionately to the amount of trips it generates.
Maybe. In terms of storm water drainage. Pavement of property may increase
volumes of storm water run-off. Yet, proposed retention basins may hold oil
sediments and slow down speed of water. As mitigation measure, the project is
conditioned to provide adequate drainage facilities to accept drainage from Blue
Mountain and properties to the East. Mitigation measure may include requirement
for drainage study in order to avoid potential cumulative impacts.
Z11
URR r 12-1 .1065
MEMORANDUM
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
California 92324-5295
Civic Center TO: Patrizia Materassi , Planning Director
(909) 824-6621
Fax(909)783-7629 FROM: Joseph Ki Lak, City Engi neer<
G-�
DATE: June 4, 1993
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 14078 - Revised
Byron R.Matteson Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval :
Mayor
General Comments:
Ronald M.Christianson
Mayor Pro Tempore (1 ) Pico Street
•Gene Carlstrom (a) Median island as proposed woL l d prevent direct access for east
Herman Hilkey bound traffic to lots 13, 14' and 15, requiring U-turn at the
Jim Singley end of median island.
Council Members
(b) Parcels on south side of Pico Street east of Blue Mountain
Thomas J. Schwab Court would likewise need to travel easterly, make a U-turn
City Manager before traveling westerly on Pico Street.
(c) The trees proposed to be retained, especially the date palms
'in the median are not the most desirable trees for public
right-of-way median. A review of this proposal is recommended
prior to approval . Nc sever, if the Planning staff and the
Planning Commission feels they should remain, Engineering has
no problems.
(2) No topography is shown easterly of the easterly tract boundary. The
steep slopes above and to the east of the tract will generate a
large amount of run-off. Provisions for the run-off should be
indicated, especially as it will effect the proposed reservoir and
the reservoir site, and Lots 7, 8, 14 and 15 of said tract.
(3) Encroachment is indicated into S.C.E. and State of California
Easements.
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval :
1 . Pico Street.
3
Attachment C
Patrizia Materassi
June 4, 1993
Page 2
(a) Dedicate to provide for 33' of right-of-way (112 street) if median
island is to be retained, otherwise 30' half-street.
(b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from median island curb.
(c) Dedicate and construct a standard cul-de-sac at the east end of Pico
or provide turn around facilities acceptable to C.D.F.
2. "A" Court
(a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way and standard
cul-de-sac. (As per General Plan Circulation Element. )
(b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline, and standard
cul-de-sac.
3. Construct standard roadway between curbs. Provide for traffic index of 6.
4. Construct standard sidewalks. (Please note - No sidewalks are proposed on
the west side of "A" Court - These are required as per Local Street - San
Bernardino County Std. No. 104. Potential alternative is to consider "A"
Court a "Frontage Road and Street" as per San Bernardino County Road
Department Standard 106a - "Residential ", designate all of the area
southerly of the south line of Lot 4 and 4 feet west of the westerly curb
line of "A" Court a lettered lot to be dedicated to the City and included
in the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, with the maintenance
cost for said landscaping to be paid for by the property owners of Tract
14078. PROPOSAL FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT WEST OF WEST CURB LINE OF COURT "A"
IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
5. Install ornamental street lights.
6. Provide adequate drainage facilities.
(a) To accept the drainage from the east, indicating the facilities
being provided and the method of disposal .
7. Construct sanitary sewer to serve all lots wu&
8. Landscaping and Lighting District shall be formed for the purpose of
maintaining the street lighting and landscaping.
9. Comply with all of the requirements of Subdivision Map Act.
10. Comply with all of the requirements of U.B.C.
11 . Pay off or split any outstanding sewer bonds issued pursuant to CSA 70
Zone H, A.D. No. 1 .
Patrizia Materassi
June 4, 1993
Page 3
12. Pay all fees as per current ordinances.
13. Plant street trees as required by the Planning Department.
14. Obtain clearance from:
(a) State of California, Department of Water Resources for any work to
be done within their right-of-way, and permit for any facilities to
be so constructed.
(b) Southern California Edison Company for any work to be done within
their right-of-way.
15. The developer has provided for a settling basin location in the southwest
corner of the parcel . The maintenance responsibility shall be with the
developer during the existence of the basin. Basin shall be properly
fenced to prevent access except for maintenance purposes. More detail is
required with respect to directing the run-off to the basin, capacity of
the basin and construction details. The construction and maintenance
costs should be secured by a cash deposit, and the basin must be completed
prior to September 30, 1993.
16. File a "Notice of Intent" with DWR pursuant to the provisions of NPDES
Permit for the San Bernardino County Valley Cities.
17. Coordinate with the property to the west for grading and drainage
facilities along the westerly line.
18. All improvements to be designed by owner's Civil Engineer to the
specifications of the City.
JK/ct
Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center CC?�� ``� SAiR PSERP�AEOI�'0
385 No.Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 924IS•0166 OFFICE `JP PUBLIC SAFETY
(714j 367.42:2, 387.4213lip 21 � DICK kVILLIAMS, Director
aml
k t♦ 4
NN 1I !AFDIh
EMERGENCY SERVICES
APR 1 9 lggg '
GRAND TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROY L E.pjqj.
7a 1 (4 007
Date : u s'l
Fire Department eferenee Number:_
ISO
Location:
1
Location: � « •
THE For,.L,OWINQ FINZE nEPARTMMfT CONDITIONS SHALL BE COI-PT!ZF.D PRIOR
1,10
RECOZE", :"ni ON OF THE FINAL MAP.:
A site i ,spection final is required to verify condit'. _ of
e- ro.>a7
hav been met. -.
12 P11,d
Private road maintenance, kncluding butno-
gractinTa
snow removal, shall be provided. Written
.shall -be submitted to the fire department havi- ye6P
ftrP Provide� access goads shall , , g jurisdi.:�io,�,
paving wid, h of twenty P-20 ) feet.de an al weather surface with a �,� -;i 7
R F_ Water systems designed to meet the required fire f;ow of this
dove opoment shall be approved by the fire
jurisdiction. The developer shall j ,, �; r impartment Navin g
h � p ' furnish the _ire department wir +-gip
copies of the water system improvement plan for approva' . Water s ems
a_ . V�shall be o eratio-1. and approved fl -t-m, ,. r `b the L wepa.. _.; ..n.. �_ �v_ -_� ary
framing construct—
occurring, •^ q 5 r
determined b the a ry The e.��., _red I. flow shay l be
Y PPropriate ,.alculations, using the San Bernardino
County "Guide For the Determination of Fire Fl�:w. " Water systems sa; l
have minimum eight ( 8 ) inch mains, six ( 6) inch risers,
Required -ire x low is 1!5&.4P>0., ��,..._ �
Ly ;asted at
Attachment D
r.Q V, r i r.a i 1 Ui, r L.1 1 i I I _•1 _ 1 .. _ i
Page Two Fire Dept Ref . No,�
i
_ APR 1 9 1993 � f
R F-2A. In areas without water serving utili ie
Protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 an be
Prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a mini , ns
with gravity flow or an approved NFPA 13, 1.3R, or 13D fire sprinkler
System. See attached private water supply requirements.
......R F-2B. MS-IL3 THROUGH IL5 . Water systems . designed to meet the
required fire flow shall be operational and approved by the fire
department prior to framing construction occurring. The required fire
flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San
Bernardino County Guide For. the Determination of Re uired Fire Flow
In areas without water serving utilities, the faze protection water
system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing.
All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow
or an approved NFPA 13 , 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler system.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
BEING ISSUED:
BP 3 . The San Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warder Departm provides fire protection for the City of Grand 'Terrace. Prioz
to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contacA:
the fire department for verification of current fire protection
development requirements . All new construction shall comply with .'ne
existing Uniform Fire Code requirements and al? applicable stGtutes,
codes , ordinances, Or standards of the fire department.
BP F4 . This c'sevelopment shalt' comply with Fire S«fety OVezla-v
conditions as adopted by County Development Code, This Fire
located in �re Review Area
BP F5 Prior to any framing construction occurring all
vegeta on shall be removed from each t s c'"J7`"'de
ch building site a i7imum dis-ance
of thirty ( 30) feet from any flammable building material, including
finished structure.
h Y_¢1 r !F L t-t—U c•_ I i114 YL H141i 114:: _ C_ « ,
Page Three Fire Dept. Ref. No.
KVt
BP F6. A minimum fuel modification zo e s ui�r 3t
cemp]y with county standards. s
C4UNTYFIRE WARDEN t
BP F7 . Prior to framing construction, approved. fire hydrants and
fire h art pavement markers shall, be installed. Fire hydrants shall
be six ( 6) inch in diameter with a minimum of one four ( 4 ) inch and one
two and a half ( 2 1/2) inch connection as specified by the fire
department. The design of -ctie fire hydrantand fire hydrant pavement
marker shall be approved by the fire department.
All fire hydrant spacing shall be three hundred ( 300) feet With the
exception of single family residential which may be increased to sir.hundred ( 600 ) feet maximum.
In areas where snow removal occurs or non -paved goads exist the blUe
reflective hydrant marker shah, be posted on an approved post three feet
from the hydrant.
`3P 8. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each
-Loadwa ne hundred and fifty ( 150) feet or mor - . � . th. Cul-de-sac
length shall not exceed six hundred ( 600) feet, except as identified in
the development code and approved by the fire chief. , ,
01
(V) ee attachM diagram of approved turnarounds.
THE FOLLOWING CONDTTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR rj� OCcupAI4Cy:
0 F9 . Prior to f inal : nspecr_ion, corLmerci aw or industrial ial bui 1d? ngs
shall post street addrect- with a minimuL•n of eycht ( 8 � Inch rn-b
Street addresses shall be visible from the street and during the hours
of darkness they shall be automatically illuminated.
',where building setbacks exceed one hundred $ 1.00' e.Y �,. -
adds f� ti cm A �a.4.la•r
ional non-il-uminat•ed c0ntrasti,ng six ( 5; nc�z n•xn.bers sha11 �;e
displayed at property access entrance.
r!-11h t I ht tl'V I t o_ I I tj 14 rLr.Ii 1i IflU
Page Four Fire De
p... Ref .
p Eatery chir,:•ne
..Se.d in. Can;;unctiOnth any fi e
Q.-I
heaappliance In which solid or liBui d fuel i s _sb j
maintained with an a ,. `
Pproved spa,.k arrester. It shall e onstructed o
stainless steel, copper or brass, woven- galvanized
{ 1.2) gauge minimum of three-eighths ( 3/8) inch minimum it I � Y 'NAw ��+y inch maximum openings, as per County Code 3381 . The mesh shall be
visible from the g,raund , No decorator caps allowed.
o 11 . The det opment and each Phase thereof shad
two (2) p ha;%t- _.
points of vehicular access for fire and other esie;ganYy
equipment, and for routes of escape which will t
safely handle evacuaions
as required by the development code.
O o Private roadways which exceed onehundred and
fift ) feet in length shall be approved by the fire ::Cpartn,nnt
having Jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one hundred fifty
(150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall,
be provided within fifty ( 50) feet of all buildings if t-he natural grade
between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty ; 3C)
percent. Where the access road cannot be provided, a fire protection
system shall, be provided as required and approved b t�t:e fire
department. y
4 F13 . An approved fire department loci IS required on all LeA .Any autarnatlC electzlc Security gates used, re-quire an appro eu�'Lock,
switch. Contact this office for lock applications.
C F19. Fire extinguishers are required inCo.-dance'" :,
Fife Code Standard
C F15 . Addi.tio:;al requirements may be applied due to t'.* yu. ;, i_L SufflCie: t l:lfOr+13:L to Xreview. Please $'ta,'iP'` ¢ ua 1Ci�':� � a�� . n '1
declaration of use fer proper application of cad~cs .
"Dl'p 'y! ggam''� -I
t^i : io�dL_ r
DRIVEWAY DESIGN ILLISTR TIOMSI
FIRE APPARATUS — PUMPER � a�� , � 1913
4 TO M'B-RIiARDJW i
COUNTY HRE WARM.N
3
- IT
1 N z
( Q ; o I � � t �I •
GURE 2-0
r
a � 1
e
i
M.
tY r
I
TURN AROUND
s" Cl IItZ 209 z —i
FIGURE ,
B i
.t r
In) — I
N 40 FIGURE
` s =
I a ?
� E
FIGURE
" : ifrySiat�' i
-TURN-AROUND
27' PR1VAT E STa : G U L, e b t • S A C)
t
i r•,V i'I r i K t . J I r_ I.
page ` Fire Dc --�--_-pt. Ref . Mo. o . A
NON-STANDARD CONDITION � APPROVE
f f i
1. f
AA-0 A
erVeA
Y Fi E WAn'FN +
2. _
3 .
4 .
Questions and comments may be directed to:
Fire Protection Planning
County Goverment Center, First Floor
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92415- 0186 .
Phone 1, 909) 387-4213 .
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
DAVID a , DR:.SCOLL, Chid
County Fire Warde^
BY:
E.rny ee amlee, Captain
Fire Pl- to Lion e i r�= ng r..zr• - i
a �._�. ..cLr
FEES
ep^v 7 ! �
Date pd :
"forms/GTcomm 4/93 )
Page Fire Dept. Ref. No.
APPROVED
NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS:
SAN KERN R INO
LINTY FIR Y1 .DEN
•
rko ,00 aAA ✓
a'0 '
ao�.Q 4-e
2..
Questions and comments may be directed to:
=ire Protection Planning
County Goverment Center, First Floor
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92415-0186.
Phone (909) 387-4213 .
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
DAVID J. DRISCOT.T,, Cn-Lef
County Fire Warden
BY:
Ernylee amlee, C__tain
Fire Pr to tic- ===nning Officer
FEE-ES
Date Pd
�' (forms/GTcomm 4/93 ) Amount �Db -�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON,Governor
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
1416 NINTH STREET,P.O.BOX 942836
SACRAMENTO,CA 94236-0001
(916)653-5791
V� ^
May 4, 1993
#j
V y
Ms. Maria C. Muett
City of Grand Terrace fy
41
22785 Barton Road ; " �P1
Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 `
U
The Department of Water Resources received the following
submittals from you for review and comment pursuant to Senate '
Bill No. 2161:
Tentative Tract Map 14078 DWR No. 33-RS-36 Date 4/22/93
PLEASE REFER TO THE DWR NO. ASSIGNED TO YOUR SUBMITTAL ON
ALL CORRESPONDENCE OR WHEN MAKING TELEPHONE INQUIRIES TO OUR
OFFICE.
The following action was taken on your submittal.
X Comments: Applicant will need to submit plans showing all
improvements within Department of Water Resources right of
way.
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CONTACT PERSON:
Leroy E,iiinghouse, Jr.
Right of Way Agent
(916) 653-1000
Attachment E
50 `tX�as ` zo*� Street Colton, Cali.cr .4. . 3� .a � ) �A-412�
may 5, 1993 =
-
A s stattt pUtrne'r. `
fifty; f`Grand:>;:Tprrsce
Barton.:Rbstd
RZ,_ TTM 88=0:2;:fitt/V -61ZE9 3 T 0 4 -
- Barney Karger:
-Company has reviewed the
Ssri..BerarclS.7in.'- utiy. a Protection Planning Oepme$ .` '.' -
AQ ..]993•;:. . 'i4:x ti ii zed 1500 GPM @ 24. PSI C&A rd : The.
s; xuctuxes:.xe ua x g:s_px nklers will also requix•e: z::app v d: Bark,
This: picject;has '60me minor eiavation and .24" travk� :ssia,3;::i4 t :•:` t zza
r�2ocation cozicer:is. tiaC, will be worked out' with the1:arapaii 'end
h-Is. Qhgineer..
c;_ncez .
Eugene P. Mcmeatz:
/ General Manager
m n_
...: . . . :... e
United States Soil Rivers: Field Office
Department of Conservation 2023 Chicago Avenue#B 14
Agriculture Service Riverside, CA 92507
r
April 16, 1993
PaaWa Materassi,Planning Director
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92324
Dear Patrizia:
'We acknowledge receipt of the Environmental Review and Tentative Map Revision for a
15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone in Riverside County,
California that was addressed to the USDA Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-
Corona Resource Conservation District for review and comment.
We have reviewed the above Environmental Impact Report and find that:
1. There are controversial items in the report within the realm of the Soil Conservation
Service's expertise and responsibilities.
a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or
flooding within the project area.
b. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or projects.
2. We find that the item listed below should be reviewed by your committee:
a. The entire project area contains soils that meet the USDA criteria for Prime X
Agricultural Lands. Vj ;
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. / '
Sincerely,
A p R
1993R. B nmWagoner
sj
Ditric nvationst L I� •
cc: Shelli Lamb,District Manager, RCRCD ` .
Attachment G