Loading...
1991-08 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -0 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TTM-90-04 (Tentative Tract Map 14868) AND E-90-07 THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Applicant, Tony Petta has applied for approval of a tentative tract map TTM-90-04 (Exhibit A) and E-90-07 (Exhibit B) for a subdivision of 3.17 acre, R1-10 parcel into 10 residential lots of 10,000 square foot minimum to be located at the northwest comer of,Victoria and Barton Road (APN 276-411-002); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by .the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act. WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 21, 1991, regarding this application, and; WHEREAS, on February 21, 1991 the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM-90-04 and E-90-07 and its Negative Declaration to City Council; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on March 28, 1991, regarding this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California,that the following findings are made in relation to TTM-90-04 and E-90- 07: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration; 5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform .to the conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace; 7. That the proposed project has considered the potential use of passive and natural energy saving devices in its design; 8. That the proposed subdivision is within the goals of the City's Housing Element with regards to housing availability. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that: A. The Negative Declaration attached as Exhibit B is hereby approved; B. TTM-90-04 (Exhibit A is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Individual lots shall be subject to Site and Architectural Review. 2. The subject property shall be dedicated to the City in order to be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and Landscaping District. 3. The Final Tract shall be consistent with California Aqueduct, Riverside Irrigation District and other legal easements. 4. All conditions as recommended by the City Engineer's Department in their recommendations dated February 14, 1991 (Attachment Xs Exhibit Q. 5. All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandums dated September 14, 1990, November 6, 1990 and February 1, 1991 (Attachment Xs Exhibit D). 6. All conditions as recommended by the Southern California Gas Company in their letter dated August 23, 1990 and August 30, 1990 (Attachment As Exhibit E). 7. All conditions as recommended by the State of California - Department of Transportation in their letter dated August 23, 1990 (Attachment Xs Exhibit F). 8. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside Highland Water Company in their letter dated August 21, 1990 (Attachment Xs Exhibit G). 9. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District in their letter dated August 27, 1990 (Attachment Ns Exhibit H). Submittal of an erosion control plan to the .City of Grand Terrace Planning Department for approval. 10. All conditions as recommended by the County of San Bernardino - Office of Special Districts in their letter dated September 5, 1990 (Attachment A's Exhibit I). 11. The area containing the proposed slope in Lots 6 and 10 facing Barton Road shall be offered for dedication to the City for the purpose of inclusion in the City's Lighting and Landscaping District. i 12. Preservation of the large pepper tree in the northwest corner of Lot 8, if feasible. 13. Victoria Street shall be paved to its fullest extent, from Preston Street to the development. Curb and gutter shall be required on the south side of Victoria Street, and no curb and gutter shall be required on the north side of Victoria Street. 14. Each individual lot shall be provided an individual curbside mailbox. Clustered gangboxes shall not be allowed. 15. A Will Serve Letter shall be obtained from the Riverside Highland Water District. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 28th day of March, 1991. ATTEST: -. - Deputy City Clerk of th -City May of the City of Gra d of-Grand�Terrace and of the Terrace and of the City City-Council thereof. Council thereof. I, BRENDA STANFILL, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby - certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Grand Terrace held on the 28th day of March, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Hilkey; Mayor Pro Tem Grant ; Mayor Matteson NOES: Councilmember Christianson ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Carlstrom Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper City Attorney -s S71Yr 0 i'.Af•.a.L. 1 fZA.1..1 �Y:. J! 10 IN THE CITY OF GPAIO TEFIRAE T}J ..r.... lm-z'a"c C.A SAN BERNARDItO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA GY.FIRTAY.I apAAae7 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14868 •�!�'--'"�"'• BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT IA OF THE VISTA GRANOE TRACT AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17 OF MAPS AT PAGE 10. II ,,........... ......•: -." . . ` ,„ .�._ "/ RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 'c�� c1 • JUNE 1990 SCALE. 1 60 II -t.� A- •.t�... 1 L.1,1.1t'lJ I .. .•'/_.- -•RACT r \10, 1 ��C7.- � ACREAGE ,1 ..... . 3 J A9SE S�P S I R/-/D-/� i•. •'1" / 276-4 11-002 5.9 ACRES GROSS WMAI lift, •Ir "�' OWNER. DEVELOPER A•r�� ��� +` •� I Q :.+L'1 ANTHONY AND ANGELINE PETTA ANTHONY AND ANGELINE PETiA T �• fiANO EATON DRIVE fIA75 EATON DRIVE GRAND TERRACE. G. 9232A GRAND TERRACE, CA. 9232a �II .JM .I. R /'POsp ,Fi1 �vh�\� �� ✓'•� 71A).025-8600 171 AI B25-B60B 4i,1` 0 If +'+ter BENCH AJW� _ \.' Ji I •'•�V j ,/ / J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. FI-1.1 TOP OF 1' IRON PIPE IIa I 'JAlB�'�L 1 ` ti1� v •�' 1091-0 SOUTH MT, VERNON AVENUE TAGGED LS 2722 AT CENfF.PL1NE AMY4"�.'if•• .1 Q/-�� COLTON, CA, 92324 POCAQAO AND BARTONF ROAN. II�� "' S ANgtY 4 `' (OLTON 5-1OB2 INTEPSECT ION OF GRAND fEPaACE - •4mrftw./. II A.Y� r P ,/• � 'Q ELEVATION: 1163.02 )h ` r .� T 1 n.v,cvo ��1 / •/ % �� Z11WIIs UTILITIES IW •I N L— K� � RI-t0, AGRICULTURAL OVERLAY ZONE ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CA. EOISON _ I. GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATION- GAS: SOUTHERN CA, GAS A �� 5 I r � �J / SINGLE FAMILY RESIOENTIAL WITH WATER RIvERS IDE-HIGHLeu MAfEP n; ✓ S �� i' f0,000 S.F. MIN, LOf SEWER: CITY OF GRAND TEAR.+CE 'D1 .�Wt. .O �c TELEPHONE: PACIFIC BELL Iris L"_^' -s.y' ��d 4j'�1 _ rr • / � •' IaT' / / 19 EARE f EASEMENT FOR WATER DITCHES AND PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF EAST R 7/I•T / � RIVERSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT PER DEED PECOPOED DUNE 21. :2 7 III I T' I \ ' >•+ =Ut z, •1 j �'?'717�r/ / // ,1d� /y\( IN BOOK 240. PAGE 161 OF DEEDS. RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO 1RA'l�xm J /, Y J � COUNTY. EXACT LOCATION IS NOT OISCCOSEO OF RECORD. '' •� 72IL ..I• �� i+ A (./4� 2 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF MILO BAKER 2FR AYYY, OEEO RECORDED MARCH tB, t909 IN BOOK A32, PAGE 256 IF C POS. RECORDS OF SAN BERNAROINO COUNTY, III 7.l7� , •`. 1, V/ / � �% EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. �� 3 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES AND DIVERSION BOX IN FAVOR OF JONM A. RDNCO, ET UX PER DEED RECORDED JULY 30, 19a'3 1N BOOK ,' •�/m 1C ' T /XRQpy /' 2270, PAGE 187 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. III ` S— `•' AfVgIN 1, ' / EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER GEED RECORDED MAY S. 1970 IN BOOK 7439. PAGE 200 OF x � '• *Z7 w, /PFFICIAL LOTTED)RECORDS OF SAN 09ANAADINO COUNTY. .A11t/ ' �• %L. TBRORMY TUR O ARDLA FASBFMTTO BE PROv10ED TO THE Cm OF DRAM rEPFV E. EANNENTTO BE VACATED 7MEM ADAACENT TRACT 6 RECOIWED AM OEVELMED. .;Ir!!\ ` ':` ''\ �✓ `1".;36/ij 7;z f+Nt A. ` iNefewX•.. LEBF3O 44 I 'I N /^�y A<PW+s rR7►rarwNw . A�,reNr Awss ATR —zZ EXISTING COVTOUR w.ATRt XTl,AIIAIJIA,N EXISTING EX SHRIO/TREE ISTING BUILDING A',M Ary•' iw EXISTING WATER MAIN —.— FX[ST ING SEWER LINE ' • `= F..KIST lNO GAS LINE IRECTI DON OF.LOW on �0,►-. A��R SOUIBM FERFACE _ ---ttz r �• nrrA. PROPOSED PAO ELEV. Nc BUILDING SETBACK LINE o— EST:MATED f00 TR, STORM FLOW y� TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION VICIMI"MAP � 2:1 SLOPE JLR OAwItiw/A�A�SNM 1 VICTORIA SW15 LOT'A• LOT B• .0T rn•+.x[ RAF7/.0 f Fa.Ii- IQT}A BCALR MOT fo YLYL Ii,�Ms qtl IM f,.ab�.a AT, .Lr4 Ka�a�/Last/:9� Planning GRFin TERR6C Department �" NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-90-04,a Tentative Tract Map 14868,and E-90-07(Environmental Review)subdividing 3.17 acres into 11 residential lots of 10,000 square foot minimum in a R1-10 zone district and Agricultural Overlay Zone. This project is within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Tony Petta LOCATION: N.W. Comer of Victoria Avenue and Barton Road (APN# 276-411-02) Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to September 26, 1990 . All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development Director. 9- CIO David R. Sawyer, Date - Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace --'EXHIBIT 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,-California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 : . i i k\ \ :`.�(�° _ • Planning JRAno TERRACE Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT TTM-90-04,a Tentative Tract Map 14868,and E-90-07(Environmental Review)subdividing 3.17 acres into 11 residential lots of 10,000 square foot minimum in a R1-10 Zone District and Agricultural Overlay Zone. This project is within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation_ APPLICANT: Tony Petta LOCATION: N.W. Corner of Victoria Avenue and Barton Road (APN# 276-411-02) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the atached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. �;���� David Sawyer, Date Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace mcm/ nn-7nc .+.., T>--A 11- , ".i TP.r�rP C`alifnrnia 4?';24-5295 • (714) 824-6621 j CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Background 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton. Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3. 'Date of Environmental Assessment: 4. Agency Requiring Assessment City .of Grand Terrace -TON% P€iTA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 6. Location of Proposal: Al, W. 6170Z ,5,,2 OF Vlayogm AAJD -6AIMW s'TREE7s 11 Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions- or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements,- compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? n c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion .which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or -any bay, X inlet or -lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. * Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture; or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? ✓ 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes -in currents., or the course or direction :of water movements, in either marine or 'fresh waters? b. Subs-tantial changes in absorption rates, drainage -patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of -surface water in any water body? e. 'Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or \� turbidity? 1` f. Alteration of the direction or rate _ of flow of,ground waters? �t'TfJ- ".- .., _.. - .,+� of�—�"kLl .� —�.tiry'- �'.�• _ .-� Yes Maybe No g. Change in the quantity of .ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of.an aquifer by cuts or excavations? �. h. Substantial reduction in the. amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered -species of plants? c. Introduction of new species -of plants into an .area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- meet of existing species? k d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of -any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or-insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? }� c. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 1 --- - - - -- Yes Maybe No 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of -people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Vill the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk -of Upset. .Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x b. Possible -interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the.proposal alter the location, distribution, density,- or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional - vehicular movement? - - - - • -' r- ���� - - - Yes Maybe No I/ b. Effects on .existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or' goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. increase in traffic hazards to-motor ` vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have .substantial effect upon, .or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational faci- lities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, k including roads? f. -Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result 'in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources ' of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a _ need for new -systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes Maybe No b_ Communications systems? c_ Water? .d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in- a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? .18. Aesthetics. Will the .proposal result in -the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site .open to - public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal res*uit in an impact upon the quality or quantity of-existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site?. b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? ' c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? - Yes Maybe No d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a' fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten Ao eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the .major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental -goals.? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs -in.-a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on .two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant..) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects "on human beings, either directly or indirectly? __tea_-mot•-----_-- -_,_,- ----- --l�n�.-' --- - -- =�_=�=-=-�— -- - --- �'=' ENVIRONMENTAL DE-:TERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: find that the- proposed project COULD NOT 'have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. —_ I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation .measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. 1 find the proposed project MAY have- a significant effect on' the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT -REPORT is required. David Sawyer Planning Dir-ectoi- - moo t -� ate Igna'ture For.Ci-ty of Grand Terrace L III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. b, 3. b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovering of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which will be reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department 6. a There may be an increase of noise level during development to a site that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 8. The existing land use will change from vacant land to low density residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan. 13. a The future development of 11 residential lots may result in the increase of additional vehicular movement This impact will be within the allowable limits set in the Traffic Circulation Element of the General Plan. Imo; F 1..vI A. if ;f�`.i'.ly)� i r(�'.I..Y �Yi. iy��iC) IN THE CITY OF GPAMO TUVMCE I ��� `` A•...... R SM BER1ARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14868 :4d. BEING A SUBDISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 14 OF THE VISTA GRANDE III •'" " .' ""• •• TRACT AS SHOWNBY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17 OF MAPS AT PACE 10• I ...............r-...... - •. .` .. • SC •— .............,i ,- RECORDS OF SAN BERNAROINO COUNTY, CALIFORNSA ' 'd ..... Jl1NE 1990 AI LIAL.,f NO, J44 3 , ALE. 1 60 ' RL-iD-a '1...... I ...J. 7A1Lg3500.!PARCEL N0. ACIEAGE �+wutavno... 1 ACRES GROSS .III -� `• .•• w`�� I • DEVELOPER -•�•' ANTHONY ANGELINE PETTA ANa'ONY AND ANIEL INE PETTA -r:..ni' -T-•-„Y.......... .... i © �e.7���' VE 1 873 EATON DRIVE +f Ae l%r / Cfl� ` l� A�� RAND TERRACE CA. 92324 GRAND TERRACE R CA. 92324 //>r T �„� ( t41 B2O-860E 17141025-8608 I� � 7 nWl4° \ ET46INE1Jf II,I F 1, ::�� I •�- �•� I `� .,,,fl J.f. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. FIFI-14 TOP OF I' :ROM PIPE h - • f09t-0 SW TM MT. VERNON AVENUE TAGGED LS 2722 AT CENTERLINE I ........ SAY 4 �•: rR/-p`� ++� �•� COLTON, CA. 92324 INTERSECTION OF GRAND TEORACE II �_ ��� I ,,,� "f \„R \r, I7141 B2S-1002 ROAD AND BARYON ROAD. •'.� Q ;•' f .ELEVAT TOM: 1163.02 III �� t T• I •� l N 2OIIM0 UTILITIES IIIYjRI-f0, AGRICULTURAL OVERLAY ZONE ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN G. EDISCN GENERAL LAND USE DES IGNITION- GAS; SOUTHERN CA, GAS ��•• a I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL KITH KATER; RIVERSIDE-HIGHLAND WATER I II'W A 'A; D' ✓µ• a �T .� 10.000 S.F. MIN. LOT SEKER; CITY OF GRAND TEPP4CE IN, O of ••'�I�, I •s,f 'Pro (��ft�L -// I� TELEPHONE; PACIFIC BELL L.�/ao A. 4 TIC I•VAV` % 1 ^� '�° " I,?7/!> , t EASEMENT FOR WATER DITCHES AND PIPEL GNES IN FAVOR OF EAST Z I �;.} jJ .) 7, /. ? +1 /y\y RIVERSIDE IPRIGATION DISTRICT PER DEED RECORCEO DUNE 21. :09? I 1 f I' •,)� '•` I' q//C� I / .'/• / "/1`P IN BOO OK, 240• PAGE 161 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNAROI`+C "'d""° EXACT LOCATION IS NOT OISCCOSEO OF RECORD. �7,�f�' I �• Lfa � '��`~ 4YX� 4� � �V y�V (./ �1 2 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF MILD BAKE.-FA ' DEED RECORDED MARCH I6, 1909 IN Q' A BOOK 432, PAGE 296.;FCF.'FCS, •' ! / W \ S OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, RECORD N III r .' _2 Y v / �' )C�1 EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORO. ATIIn '"� •// 3 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES AND DIVERSION BOX IN FAVOR OF S/7y JOHN A, RONCO, ET UX PER DEED RECORDED JULY 30. 1940 IN BCOK III 2/r1eAr 2270. PAGE 1B7 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. .9 t L ; Av / EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD, MINT I 1 1 II X I .I 6/ • �/ O EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ / PER DEED RECOPOED MAY B, 1970 IN BOOR 7439. PAGE 200 OF 1• [llfl.ANLW [� Y� �:r,.^,.,,, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNAROINO COUNTY, �'ly� .f17f"7"'•"^� IPLOTTEDI • ' j .err ' TEN'"AMY TIAUAOUIO `L) . A/4 .X'L`7/LL�f-Tr�� j' ' • `• •' 1 .: rEARACE 6A"TfT TO BE VACATED Mf�ADJACCEN T TO BE ACTOe{tf�E0 ANCrryD EVgOPPED I ( :�'i�f�. �..S.l l I j�: :•�,'•!t,'.A �, 1% T /.• /...•^j �l...,�'RY.VAK , fir.!"•)L' M.8.136/77-79 II j. ' 7w/iwrarAww LEfioa 44 EXISTING CONTOUR ©L '<ISTING SHRUB/TREE 44V LC 4T* tjyv — EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING WATER MAIN I —�— E%IST:N6 SEWER LINE• 1L• ' l7y ter _117 FINISH SURFACE%:STINGGA LINE OY •e SQUARE FEET 1 3! °lort PROPOSED PAD ELEV, PAL BUILDING SETBACK LINE O— ESTIMATED 100 TR, STORM FLOW TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SE"Lal1 VICINITY MAM 2:1 SLOPE JL/.04:W4�rwA.weA VICTORIA STREET LOT 'A' JFD NOT 10 SCALE MOT to Sul! v0T TO CnLe RAA!'/ ! rf iA�u.�o.eAw 1� U 41f WY AJ 1u.ALY4y4 • P Lily -' d W.O. 12-1 . 1063 GR6Nt7 TERR CE M E M O R A N D U M 22795 Barton Road TO: David Sawyer, Community Development Director Grand Terrace California 92324 5295 FROM: Joseph Ki cak, City Engineer Civic Center DATE: February 14, 1991 (714) 824-6621 SUBJECT: T.T.M. 14868 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for subject tract map: General Comments: Byron R. Matteson Mayor 1 , Victoria Street and Lot B (street within the subdivision exceed the maximum length of a single point access street, however it is my Hugh J.Grant' understanding that Fire Marshal approved this as temporary measures Mayor ProTempore with condition that temporary turn around facilities are .provided. Gene Carlstrom 2. Drainage from Lots 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 i s tributary to the north, to a ,nald M. Christianson privately owned parcel . Provisions to accept and convey that Herman Hilkey drainage to a public right-of-way without erosion must be made. Council Members Thomas J. Schwab Recommendations: City Manager 1. Victoria Street Current width of Victoria Street paving is approximately 20 feet and in very poor condition. This street provides the only access to the proposed subdivision. Portion of the run-off from the subdivision is tributary to Victoria Street and therefore must be contained within the public right-of-way of Victoria Street. (a) Construct curb and gutter on the southerly side of Victoria Street, 18 feet from street centerline. (b) Construct standard roadway in Victoria Street from the lip of gutter to a point 10 feet north of street centerline. (Design TI=6) 2. Lot A and B (a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way. (b) Construct curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. EXHIBIT - C {' Memo to David Sawyer \ February 14, 1991 Page 2 (c) Construct standard roadway between curbs. (TI=6) (d) Dedicate roadway for turn around facilities to accommodate emergency vehicles and construct roadway for that purpose, as may be required by the fire marshal . (TI=6) 3. Construct standard sidewalk. 4. Install ornamental street lights. 5. Install sanitary sewer to serve all lots. 6. Show proof of paying off the sewer assessment. 7. Obtain approval from State of California, Department of Water Resources' for all proposed construction within D.W.R. R/W. 8. Provide drainage study and adequate drainage facilities based on that report. 9. Submit grading plan for the proposed subdivision. 10. Pay all capital improvement fund fees. 11 . All utilities shall be underground. 12. Street name(s) shall be approved by Historical Committee of the City of Grand Terrace. 13. A11, improvements shall be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City. JK/ct F R C, Gg 1 4 v M c, Li Su8jECT ..DATE SIG M SIGNED D.4%TE OWN RMFOM, 45 472 SEND PARTS I AND 3 INTACT - ........ PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY, POLY PAK 1'4:0 SM) ZPA72 EXHIBIT D Lr �:�ESTRY AND FIR.�.'�CI• DEN DEPARTMEN - ;OUNTY OF SAN SEftNARI7[NO Fire Protraction Planning Services • County Govemment Center OFFICE OF PUBIC SAFETY 385 No. Arrowhead Avenue, Flrat Floor San Bernardino. CA 92415.0185 FLOYU riLLt,'ELL. Director (714) 387-4212, 387-4213 rL _ EMERGENCY SERVICES INA November 6, 1990 City of. Grar..` 22795 Barton Road vrand Terrace, Ca. 92324-5295 1;,;;,.,.,,r:;,,:„!r.•:,: , Attention: David R. Sawyer c:.y A ". IMi. C:reil.•.:. 11:1!:: Community Development Director C-I'l,,., ,,{,,,,,,,, Ri.,,, fky��ett irpr Re: TTM 90-04/TR 14868 /l A.VcHt .1 Tony Petta I::AL„yW z have reviewed the revised tentative tract map for the above project. This plan does not comply with the fire department conditions sent to the applicant .on September 14, , 1990. The I,•,r"<i:!'proposed plan is not in compliance with the following fire department conditions: "F-6. Prior to final inspect or occupany the ii•""� '�'''`'""' development and each phase thereof whall have two (2) points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, ���''�� ' ' and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations =CM L onta i s as required in the development code. " i1:I,j:ri„rt...,av,n�; "F-8. Prior to final inspection or occupancy a turn- LytI.,et�Y•� around shall be provided at the end of each roadway, one- Metitune hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be Mr,u,.lai::V:,:t.,got••,, approved by the Fire Department. Cud.-de-sac length shall not Minong<,V:11,14:; exceed six-hundred feet except as identified in the (,Mk Q.,, development code and approved by the chief." tt.,k tl,,,_ I•..,k n7igd). Tentative Tract 14483 to the north of this project was FWPX,Dim-. unable to get easements needed to continue Vicotria Street to Arliss which would open the access to this project at both I,!rntr:ctivµ,: ends. This creates a cul-de-sac over 600 feet for this Project. 'Another area of concern is the driveways for lots -Zan 10 and 11. There must be a turnaround for, any driveways over `"°a"" 150 feet. t,ny v��,I✓I:.- The project is not acceptable as now proposed. st,ntmit v,tiay frny1cee rely, NOV 0 71990 J es, in Fire Prot ction Planning Officer G: ilJljt=Ci TiT ?C nt (l1�1:�:!: =•1..�.. t cam•;��ic«:.. t:,\' c •_.:`: a.. . ... ' a.. c.i�.•pt. _ �]._ j !i:w U L7p ri' :.- -..1 ii.•.Lct� !.:.;.�. ��«.... r.r.:-t. _._c•.. FORJESTRY AND FIRE V,,A_..DEN DEPARTMENT _JUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 385 No. Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor San Bernardino. CA 92415-0186 FLOYD TIDWELL„Director (714)387-4212, 387-4213 -,,\ Vol 4 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES �21 BEP Date= TO: � �� � Dee, -he following cir ed conditions apply to your project. Fire Department Reference Number: el 'The above referenced .project is protected by the San Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden Department. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the appiicant shall contact' the Fire Department for verification of current Fire Protection requirements. ( All new construction shall comply with the existing �•/ Uniform Fire Code Requirements and all applicable statues, codes, ordinances, or standards of the Fire - Department. - F-3 The street address shall be posted with a minimum of - four (4) inch numbers, visible from the street and during the hours of darkness -the numbers shall be low voltage internally electrically illuminated. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: Where building set backs exceed 100 feet from the roadway, additional contrasting four _2. (4) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrance. , 04 Prior to- final inspection or occupancy each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrester as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. -5 Prior to any construction occurring, all flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished =- structure. 06 Prior to final inspection or occupancy the development and each phase thereof shall have two (2) points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency -f equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the development code. F-7 Prior to final inspection or occupancy, private roadways which exceed one-hundred and fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department having -jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An .- access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet_ of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty .percent (30) . Where the access roadway-cannot be provided, an approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided, as required and approved by the Fire Department. -8 Prior to final inspection or occupancy a turn-around shall be provided at the end of each roadway, one- hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be approved by the Fire Department. Cul-de-sac ' length shall not exceed six-hundred (600) feet except as identified in the development code and approved by the chief. F-9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the Fire Department having jurisdiction. Private fire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with minimum paving width of twenty (20) feet. F-10 Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow _ of this development-shall be approved by the Fire Department having jurisdiction.- The developer-shall furnish the Fire Department with two copies of the water system improvement plan for approval and a letter from the Water Purveyor stating the availability of the required fire flow prior to recordation. Water systems shall be operational and approved by the Fire Department prior to any construction occurring.. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow." In areas without water-serving utilities, the fire protection. water system shall be based on NFPA pamphlet number 1231 and Uniform fire Code requirements. F-10 MS-IL3 THROUGH IL5 Water systems designed to meet the require&-fire flow shall be operational and approved by the Fire Department prior to any construction occurring. The required fire flow.shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide For The Determination of Required -Fire Flow". In areas without water-serving utilities, or fire protection water serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based on N.F.P.A. Pamphlet Number 1231 and the San Bernardino County Uniform Fire Code. F-11 Prior to Building permits being issued approved fire hydrants and fire hydrant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall be 6" diameter with a minimum one 4" and one 2 1/2" connection. The hydrant and, fire hydrant markers shall be approved by Fire Department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be 300 feet with the exception of single family residential which may be increased to 600 feet maximum. F-12 Prior to final inspection or occupancy this development shall. comply with Fire Safety overlay conditions as adopted in County Ordinance Number 3341. The development is located in Fire Review Area. F-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit a fuel modification zone in compliance with county standards is required. F-14 Prior to final inspection. or occupancy, an approved Fire Department key box is required. If automatic electric security gates are used an approved lock switch is required on each gate in lieu of the box. Questions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning Section; County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, lst Floor, San Bernardino, California, . 92415-0186; or call (714) .387-4225. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief C ty Fire Warden By - Fize Pro ectiq Planning Officer c. REC'D A U u 27 1990 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA S COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE • REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 3= REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92373-9982 August 2,3, 1990 City of Grand Terrace Community Development Director 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92324-5295 ATTENTION : David R. Sawyer SUBJECT: File No_ TTM-y0-04 , E-90-07 The division and development of File No. TTM-90-04 , E-90-07 will interfere with the free and complete exercise of Southern California vas Company's pipeline easement. Southern California Gas Company operates and maintains facilities within the bounds of the subject area . Southern California Gas Company, therefore, must object to the recordation of File No. TTM-90-04 , E-90-07 , until more detailed plans are available and satisfactory arrangements can be made with the petitioner . Please contact Mr_ Roger .-Baughman for arrangements at (714)335-7970 _ Sincere" V`- enSoverns Technical Supervisor KGS:pat EXHIBIT E �L►�r �,�t f�`� 19gr1 REC STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS, P.O. BOX 231 _ SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 August 23, 1990 08-SBd-215-1'. 3 Mr. David R. Sawyer Planning Department City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Tentative Tract Map 90-04 in the City of Grand Terrace Although the traffic generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic are to be considered. ' If you have any questions, please contact Tom Meyers at (714) 383-6908 or FAX (714) 383-4936. Very truly yours, HARVEY J. SAWYER Chief, Transportation Planning Branch B EXHIBIT :F RE CT U li 19 9 RD 1 P�nu E C w �.. m 1450 Washington Street Colton, California 92324 (714) 825-4128 co,6 .AQ August2l, 1990 City of Grand:Terrace 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324-5295 DAVID SAWYER Community Development Director RE: North west corner of Victoria and Barton TTM-90-04 Tentative Tract #14868 Dear David, Riverside Highland Water Company has a 10" steel water main in Victoria Street. Lot 6 of this tract -seems to have a slope on top of that water main. This could be a problem when the grading is done. To meet fire flows in this tract the water main will need to be extended north of the tract to Arliss then west on Arliss to Preston St. Maybe the developers of tract 14483 and 14868 could work on this problem together. Thank You. Sincerely, Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RH/kb �uui�i-r r PS\D E-Co Riverside-Corona • Resource Conservation District CO 2023CHICAGO AVENUE,614 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92507 PHONE(714)683-7691 9pFcpNSERV Pt`p� August 27, 1990 Dear City of Grand Terrace, We acknowledge receipt of the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for TrM-90-04,E-90-07 in San Bernardino County, California that was addressed to the USDA, Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District on August 23, 1990 for review and comment. We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and find that: 1• There are no controversial items in the report within the realm of the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities. a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or flooding within the project area. b. There is no Prime, State,Unique or Locally Important Farmland involved in the project area. c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or projects. We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by our committ ee: tee. In review of the above application, we recommend an erosion control plan be included in overall plan to address wind and water erosion both during and after. construction. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. Sincerely, STANLEY COOLEY Vice=President �XH1�31T• . H 101 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS `�`�'I'''�% COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ^ Vest Fifth Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0450 • (714) 387-5940 , VERNON G. KNOUREK Telecopier • (714) 387-5968 J I1� 'Assistant Administrative Officer for Special Districts September 5, 1990 David Sawyer Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 RE: TTM-90-04 IN RE: COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70, IMPROVEMENT ZONE H, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 276-411-02, ASSESSMENT NO. 10-021 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Our records indicate the above referenced project, as identified by Assessor's Parcel No. 276-411-02, lies within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone H, Assessment District No. 1, has an - unpaid special assessment levied against it. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66493 (d) the owner of the parcel that is being subdivided is required to cause the special assessment to be apportioned to the resulting parcels. In the alternative the owner may wish to prepay the assessment. Therefore, prior to recordation of the Final Map, proof of assessment apportionment or proof of assessment prepayment must be submitted to this agency. Please contact me at (714) 387-5829 if you have any questions. Ve ly ours �: K VON AALD Staff Analyst Development Services Division Office of Special Districts a:grndtrce.ltr/5 EXHIBIT-