134 ORDINANCE NO. 134
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA. ADOPTING AMENDMENT Z-91-02, CHAPTER 18.20
REMOVING ONE PARCEL IN THE BARTON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
ADDING TO THE R2 ZONE DISTRICT AND ITS ASSOCIATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION (E-91-02)
WHEREAS,the City Council approved a revised General Plan on December 8, 1988;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a revised Zoning Amendment, Z-90-01,
establishing the Barton Road Specific Plan (SP-90-01) as an independent zoning district
(BRSP); and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Amendment, Z-91-02, set out in full in Exhibits
A and B, herein removes one parcel (#275-242-01) from the Barton Road Specific Plan
Zone District (SP-91-01) and places into the R2 Zone, Low Medium Density Residential
amending Chapter 18.20 of Title 18 in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Amendment, Z-91-02 amends the City's Zoning
Map as indicated on Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS,the City's Zoning Districts shall be in accordance with the General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and this Negative
Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. This
Negative Declaration is available for review at the City Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on
April 18, 1991 and continued to May 16, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting on Thursday, May 16, 1991
recommended to the City Council that the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. Z-
91-02, which amends Chapter 18.20 (SP-91-01 Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment) be
approved and adopted by the City Council.
C
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on April 25,
1991 on SP-91-01, GP-91-01, Z-91-02 and E-91-02 continued; and
WHEREAS,the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on May 23, 1991
on SP-91-01, GP-91-01, Z-91-02 and E-91-02; and
NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. Z-91-02 set
out in full in the attached Exhibit A and C, which amends
Chapter 18.20 (Barton Road Specific Plan) and Zoning District
Map is approved and adopted by the City Council.
SECTION 2: E-91-02 - The Negative Declaration on file in the Planning
Department of the City of Grand Terrace for the Barton Road
Specific Plan Amendment, SP-91-01 and Zoning District Map
Amendment, Z-91-02, is approved and adopted by the City
Council.
SECTION 3: Effective Date - this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day of its adoption.
SECTION 4: Posting - the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted
in three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its
adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council.
SECTION 5: First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the 23rd day of May, 1991, and finally adopted and
ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the
13th day of June, 1991.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk of tl e City May of the City
of Grand Terrace and of the of and Terrace and of the
City Council thereof City Council thereof
I, Brenda Stanfill, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do
J6„„ hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 13th day of June, 1991 by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Carlstrom, Christianson and Hilkey;
Mayor Pro Tem Grant ; Mayor Matteson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Brenda Stanfill
Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John Harper,
City Attorney
i
BARTON ROAD COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR
SPECIFIC PLAN
hob 1 .�•�,� � I � .. i_ .. ----=,��I -, I�/ .•� �`� i\. `•�\ � \ I I
♦P~� , 1 a � I , I .� r �\" __ ... � I,. i_..__._�JL�,�, 111 .�\� �/ �-!
�-��•
I I I I I I I I i 11 `r:�:J' �; • <�j: � r--I I, I C I � � \ �.�
: .I • : `:fit:: _ -
G IL
1
1
LEGEND EXHIBIT A
® GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) EXISTING
ADM INISTRATIVE\PROFESSIONAL (AP)
[T37) MASTER PLAN AREA EXHIBIT III
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE
BARTON ROAD COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR
SPECIFIC PLAN
ly
y� 1 r
L1
pi
1 ' •� :ASS ::y':�:::•.
LEGEND EXHIBIT B
® GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATIVE\PROFESSIONAL (AP)
o EXHIBIT III
(3) MASTER PLAN AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE
�ITy �
I
o Planning
n
G )TERRF+C
Department
NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment due to mitigation measures included in the project and
described in the Initial Study project.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
An application,SP-91-01,amendment to the Barton Road Specific Plan,minor modifications
to the following sections:
III, B Land Use Categories and Map - APN# 275-242-01 is being removed
from the Specific Plan Area.
IV, I Signs - Change to allow Site and Architectural Review Board greater
discretion in approving signs, and change multi-tenant center
identification signs' copy limitations.
This application consists of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Map, GP-91-
01, and Zoning Ordinance and Map, Z-91-02:
GP-91-01 Amendment to General Plan Land Use and Map - APN# 275-242-01
is being removed from the Specific Plan area, General Commercial, to
the MDR District (Medium Density Residential).
Z-91-02 Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and District Map, changing
parcel APN#275-242-01 in the Barton Road Specific Plan Zone to the
R2, Low Medium Density Residential District.
E-91-02 Environmental Review of aforementioned projects,SP-91-01,GP-91-01
and Z-91-02.
APPLICANT:
The City of Grand Terrace
-- EXHIBIT C
22795 Barton Road 0 Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
LOCATION:
,► Relation to Land Use Categories and Map - 22313 Mc Clarren Street
Relation to Sign Changes - All properties located along Barton Road between the 215
Freeway and Victoria Street.
*****************************************************************
Copies of the Negative Declaration and-Initial Study for this project are available for review
at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace,
CA, (714-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to May
20, 1991. All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development
Director, City of Grand Terrace.
Maria C. Muett Date
Acting Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
,may
CirY
Planning
rERRticE Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment due to mitigation measures included in the project and
described in the Initial Study project.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
An application,SP-91-01,amendment to the Barton Road Specific Plan,minor modifications
to the following sections:
III, B Land Use Categories and Map - APN# 275-242-01 is being
removed from the Specific Plan Area.
IV, I Signs - Change to allow Site and Architectural Review Board greater
discretion in approving signs, and change multi-tenant center identification
�W signs' copy limitations.
This application consists of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Map, GP-91-
01, and Zoning Ordinance and Map, Z-91-02:
GP-91-01 Amendment to General Plan Land Use and Map-APN# 275-242-01 is being
removed from the Specific Plan area, General Commercial, to the MDR
District (Medium Density Residential).
Z-91-02 Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and District Map, changing parcel
APN# 275-242-01 in the Barton Road Specific Plan Zone to the R2, Low
Medium Density Residential District.
E-91-02 Environmental Review of aforementioned projects, SP-91-01, GP-91-01 and
Z-91-02.
APPLICANT:
The City of Grand Terrace, California
22795 Barton Road 8 Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
LOCATION:
Relation to the Land Use and Map Change, 22313 Mc Clarren Street.
Relation to Sign Change - All properties located along Barton Road between the 215
Freeway and Victoria Street.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
Maria C. Muett Date
Acting Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
4r CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
I Background
1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director
3. Date of Environmental Assessment:
4. Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace
EHovAL "A LoT
FRoH �1tTb� RORD SPEuFIGPtAu• Il •!
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable-OA"L- -MAitods„r,,-�AAo4Kr;V,e0_ let.
OAI I 11q l6R5l —J C/+4n4e I"-/t; -7—dIr&cCvrtc✓4en nS Cgto
6. Location of Proposal: -Aa-3ia c.44N6F-fN4YO
- AL[ 6,94!nn AoaD -11 c
�!S-FRa/y,/9yc� Vlcrn.�/A _c-r,CJ a�.T -- S/6ti1 �ArA116F•
II Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions- or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
c. Substantial change in topography or
ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e. Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
Yes Maybe No
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or
the bed of the ocean or any bay, —
inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterior-
ation of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors? �(
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture,
or temperature, or any change in
climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Substantial changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? N
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in
any alteration of surface water qual-
ity, including, but not limited to,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of .ground waters?
r�
Yes Maybe No
g. Change in the quantity of ground
%W waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals , or through inter-
ception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations? k
h. Substantial reduction in the amount 7�
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies? X
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)? x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants? �(
4W c. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area of native vegetation, or
in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Substantial reduction in acreage of
any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, X rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
1
Yes Maybe No
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
1%W a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
substantial new light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event X
of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro-
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
-- —
Eli
---b
13
Yes Maybe No
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing Y
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor \�
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? J�
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a need
for new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
4 c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational faci-
lities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or re-
quire the development of new sources
of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes Maybe No
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal? _
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential —
health hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or historic archaeo-
logical site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
' c. Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural —
values?
Yes Maybe No
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
. potential impact area?
21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the environ-
ment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history
or prehistory? _
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which oc-
curs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the future. )
4 c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually, limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. ) X
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
kOn the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared. _
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on'
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
David Sawyer
Planning Director
ate ►gnatur
4 For .City of Grand Terrace
III. DISCUSSION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
8. In the Barton Road Speck Plan District, the proposed landuse change will
eliminate one lot from the General Commercial Subarea. This change will
blend the one lot in with the surrounding Zone District, Medium Density
Residential, R2. This change is mitigated in the Master Environmental
Analysis for GP-87-04.
•