248 Ordinance No. 248
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA RESCINDING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVMENT
AND ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT FEE,SCHEDULES (4.104) AND REPLACING
IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace continues to encourage new development of its
vacant parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of
existing buildings; and
WHEREAS, proposed projects continue to drive the demand for municipal
services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's public
facilities in order to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in
order to accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including street
and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace in cooperation with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed
to accommodate future growth, estimated the cost of these improvements, and
identified a potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace updated its Arterial Improvement Fees by
adopting Ordinance 242 on January 13, 2008 to be eligible for supplemental
funding for arterial infrastructure that will become available under San Bernardino
County's Measure I Program starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2009, the City of Grand Terrace adopted Ordinance
244 to add an Operational Improvement Fee to the Arterial Improvement Fees
due to additional infrastructure improvements identified; and
WHEREAS, previously projected infrastructure projects, project costs, and
funding sources may have changed and the City of Grand Terrace desires to re-
evaluate previous studies made in accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of
the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the recommendation to review the fees included in Chapter 4.104
undertaken as a result of Amendment No. 6 are expected
to result in attracting necessary commercial facilities to the Project Area,
correct inadequate public,improvements that have impeded development
opportunities, assist in the removal of obsolete structures, rehabilitate
deteriorated and dilapidated structures and address high crime rates.
12.The findings set forth in paragraphs (9), (10) and (12) of subdivision (d) of
Section 33367 of the CRL are not applicable to the approval and adoption
of Amendment No. 6 because Amendment No. 6 does not make any
changes to the size and shape of the Project Area and, consequently, as
7
of 5
bond meeting the requirements set forth
in the Subdivision Map Act shall be filed. In determining the amount of the bond, the
October 12, 2010
Page 72 of 74
that this provision is met to the satisfaction
October 12, 2010
Page70of74
al to the difference between the
amount it would have cost the subdivider to install such improvements to serve
the subdivision only and the actual cost of such improvements.
October 12, 2010
Page 65 of 74
October 12, 2010
Page 40 of 74
-25- December 14,2010
development director shall again determine whether the application is complete.
Page35of43
upp. 1140 (E.D. Tenn. 1995);
Page 9 of 43
o not adequately protect the health, safety, and general welfare of
Page 6 of 43
' cases of congenital syphilis, were reported for Los Angeles County residents, while the
2010 Communicable Diseases Report reported 355 cases of hepatitis B were reported
Page 2 of 43
of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and consider modifications to the schedule
-- of fees and charges has been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the tables of fees, Chapter 4.104.050 and 4.104.00, and replace with
the following fees for a period not to exceed 24 months:
Traffic Signal Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $ 373.16
2. Attached Dwelling Units $ 228.51
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $ 840.00
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $274.40
_ (per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1.. Office (TSF-GLA) $431.20
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Arterial Improvement Fee
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $4242.58
2. Attached Dwelling Units $2598.02
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $9524.14
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $3088.52
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $4884.17
Terrace adopted Ordinance
244 to add an Operational Improvement Fee to the Arterial Improvement Fees
due to additional infrastructure improvements identified; and
WHEREAS, previously projected infrastructure projects, project costs, and
funding sources may have changed and the City of Grand Terrace desires to re-
evaluate previous studies made in accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of
the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the recommendation to review the fees included in Chapter 4.104
undertaken as a result of Amendment No. 6 are expected
to result in attracting necessary commercial facilities to the Project Area,
correct inadequate public,improvements that have impeded development
opportunities, assist in the removal of obsolete structures, rehabilitate
deteriorated and dilapidated structures and address high crime rates.
12.The findings set forth in paragraphs (9), (10) and (12) of subdivision (d) of
Section 33367 of the CRL are not applicable to the approval and adoption
of Amendment No. 6 because Amendment No. 6 does not make any
changes to the size and shape of the Project Area and, consequently, as
7
of 5
bond meeting the requirements set forth
in the Subdivision Map Act shall be filed. In determining the amount of the bond, the
October 12, 2010
Page 72 of 74
that this provision is met to the satisfaction
October 12, 2010
Page70of74
al to the difference between the
amount it would have cost the subdivider to install such improvements to serve
the subdivision only and the actual cost of such improvements.
October 12, 2010
Page 65 of 74
October 12, 2010
Page 40 of 74
-25- December 14,2010
development director shall again determine whether the application is complete.
Page35of43
upp. 1140 (E.D. Tenn. 1995);
Page 9 of 43
o not adequately protect the health, safety, and general welfare of
Page 6 of 43
' cases of congenital syphilis, were reported for Los Angeles County residents, while the
2010 Communicable Diseases Report reported 355 cases of hepatitis B were reported
Page 2 of 43
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
rrace, do hereby certify
that the foregoing ordinance was duly and regularly introduced at a meeting of the City
Council on the 27th day of April, 2010, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmember Stanckiewitz, Mayor Pro Tem Garcia and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Cortes
ABSTAIN: None
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
d0611
John Harper, ty ttorney
May 11 , 2010 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Cortes and Stanckiewitz; Mayor Pro Tem Garcia
and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Approved as to rm.
John R. Harper, Attorney
8
-1- December 14,2010
sansultrifhtheCcmmunal'DEwel PmsntDEpmb, L
Page 10 of 11
ATTEST:
WiLe -y/4(!A.-44-e_ _ , e.A,..ie__ ''
City Clerk of the City of Mayor of e City of rand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of t e City Council thereof
City Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on
February 23 , 2010 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Cortes, Miller and Stanckiewitz; Mayor Pro Tem
Garcia and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
City Clerk
Br nda Mrs:
Approved . . form:
City Attorn
John Harper
rm.
John R. Harper, Attorney
8
-1- December 14,2010
sansultrifhtheCcmmunal'DEwel PmsntDEpmb, L
Page 10 of 11