02/14/2002 F ILE COPY ,
CITY
GRAND
`TERR C;;= - .E F6bruary,14, 2002 =
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
California 92313-5295
Civic Center `
(909)824-6621 _
Fax(909)783-7629
Fax(909)783-2600 IC.ITV OF. GRAND TERRACE '
Dan Buchanan
Mayor - - -
CRAXITY COUNCIL
LceAnn Garcia
'Mayor Pro Tern REGULAR MEETINGS
Herman Hilkey,,, -
DonLarldn 2ND AND'4TH Thursdays - 6:00--p.m.
Maryetta Ferr6
Council Members
Thomas J.Schwab
` City Manager
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center- '-
= 22795 Barton,Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 14, 2002
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 5:00 P.M.
22795 Barton Road
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990.IF YOU
REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE AT(909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING,OTHER THAN UNDER PUBLIC
COMMENT,YOU ARE ASKED TO PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE
ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED UPON BY THE MAYOR AT
THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
* Call to Order-
* Invocation-
* Pledge of Allegiance-
* Roll Call-
STAFF COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING-5:00 P.M.
1. Budget Workshop
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-7:00 P.M.
1. Approval of 01-24-2002 Minutes Approve
2. Check Register CR0203 Approve
3. Annual Statement of Investment Policy Adopt
4. Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30,2001 Accept _
5. Combined Cash and Investments Treasury for Quarter Ended Accept
December 31,2001
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation-Stater Brothers Markets
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen
may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for
di'scussion.
A. Approval of Check Register CO203 Approval
B. Ratify 02-14-2002 CRA Action
C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
D. Approval of 01-24-2002 Minutes Approve
COUNCIL AGENDA
02-14-2002 PAGE 2 OF 2
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
E. Phase III Bicycle and Pedestrian Staging Areas and Grand Award
Terrace Road Realignment Contract Award
F. Annual Statement of Investment Policy Adopt
G. Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, Accept
2001
H. Purchase of Floor Cleaning Equipment for the Grand Authorize/Appropriate
Terrace Community.Pride Program
I. Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for Accept
Quarter Ended December 31,2001
J. Right-of-Way Dedication North Easterly Corner Grand Accept
Terrace Road(Honey Hill Drive)
K. 23190 Westwood Street Conditional Encroachment Accept
Agreement-Berdj and Deborah Seuylemezian
I
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
5. ORAL REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
1. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee
a. Minutes of January 7,2002 Accept
B. Council Reports
I
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS-None
I
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Legislative Update
9. CLOSED SESSION
A. Personnel Negotiations'
B. Potential Litigation Spring Mountain Ranch
ADJOURN
i
i
i
I
i
THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD
ON THURSDAY,FEBRUARY,28,2002.
.......................................................................................................................
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 02-28-2002 MEETING
MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE BY NOON 02-21-2002.
PENDING C R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING-JANUARY 24, 2002
f
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in
the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,
on January 24, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Dan Buchanan, Chairman
Lee Ann Garcia, Vice-Chairwoman
Herman Hilkey, Agency Member
Don Larkin, Agency Member
Maryetta Ferr6, Agency Member
Tom Schwab, Executive Director
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director
Larry Ronnow, Finance Director
Jerry Glander, Building&Safety Director
Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff s Department
ABSENT: John Harper, City Attorney
APPROVAL OF 01-10-2002 MINUTES
CRA-2002-04 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN, SECOND AGENCY MEMBER
FERRE, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the January 10, 2002 Community
Redevelopment Agency Minutes.
CHECK REGISTER CR0202
CRA-2002-05-MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER FERRE,SECOND BY'VICE-CHAIRWOMAN
GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve check register CR0202.
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR E'NDING JUNE 30. 2001
CRA-2002-06 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
FERRE, CARRIED 5-0, to continue the Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year
Ending June 30, 2001 until February 14, 2002.
Chairman Buchanan temporarily adj ourned the Community Redevelopment AgencyMeeting at 6:10
p.m.
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes
January 24,2002
Page 2
Chairman Buchanan reconvened the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 7:30 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION- REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS (22850 LA PAIR)
Chairman Buchanan announced that the Agencymet in Closed Session to discuss Real Estate
Negotiations at 22850 LA Paix and that there was no reportable action taken.
Chairman Buchanan adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 7:50 p.m. until
the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, February 14, 2002 at 5:00
p.m.
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
i
i
i
DINo CM r 'IPPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0203 -_-
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
13878 CASH PURCHASE 22317 BARTON RD. 208,127.00
13882 GRAND TERRACE WOMAN'S CLUB HOME OF DISTINCTION WINNER 50.00
13883 CASH BID ON 22552 THRUSH 120,000.00
13886 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1/31 LEAGUE MEETING-SCHWAB 30.00
13887 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION SACTO LEAGUE MEALS/EXPENSES 557.36
13888 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH INSURANCE-FEBRUARY 1,574.35
13889 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE MHN-FEBRUARY 83.91
13891 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY FEBRUARY 2002 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 41.46
13897 GARY GERHARD BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00
46529 CALED ANNUAL CITY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 445.00
46531 CLEANING SERVICES CLEANING SERVICES-BUILDING & SAFETY 150.00
46535 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY COPIER BASIC FEE & PER COPY CHARGES 64.43
46538 DELL MARKETING, L.P. DELL COMPUTER 4400 PENTIUM-HOUSING 1,955.66
n 46540 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM JANUARY LAWN SERVICE-22293 BARTON 40.00
a 46542 EDEN SYSTEMS TRIP EXPENSES-1/17/02-MITCHELL 298.46
46553 ROBERTO HERNANDEZ REIMBURSE STUDENT FEES-HERNANDEZ 43.00
46561 JEFF GOLLIHAR SERVICES 1/16/02 THROUGH 2/5/02 1,089.00
of 46562 JUHL ELECTRIC REPAIR GFf CIRCUIT-22850 LA PAIX 365.00
p 46571 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 51.38
46574 RIVERSIDE BUEPRINT ADDRESS MAP COPIES 17.83
46575 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY STOCK TRANSFER-22181 BARTON 9.53
�. 46586 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY-REHAB HOUSES 60.45
Z 46589 TEXACO FUEL-HOUSING TRUCK 19.66
0 46590 PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY CANCELLATION FEE-S.DIEGO CONFERENCE 25.00
1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0203
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
----------46596-VAVRINEt(TRINE DAY-&-COMPANY--- ---2-,400-.00_________ -
46597 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 5 CELL PHONES-BLDG & SAFETY 217.81
46600 WEARGUARD WORK CLOTHES SHIRTS-CODE ENFORCEMENT 175.66
46603 WILLIDAN BLDG. INSPECTOR FEES 12/7-12/28/01 1,680.00
46605 YOSEMITE WATER BOTTLED WATER-HOUSING 18.75
GRAND TOTAL $339,640.70
I CERTIFY THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE
EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY.
Z7 I
LARRY RONNOW
FINANCE DIRECTOR
2
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Dept
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM(X) COUNCIL ITEM( ) MEETING DATE : February 14, 2002
AGENDA ITEM
�i SUBJECT: A_\NNUAL STATEMENT OF INS ZSTMENT POLICY
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
The Government Code requires that the Treasurer present an annual Statement,of Investment
Policy to the governing body for review. The current investment policy was last adopted in
January 2001.
No changes are proposed at this time.
Staff recon:n:ends that Agency Board.-
Adopt annual Statement of CRA Investment Policy
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. �J
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
1. 0 POLICY
It is the policy of the CRA of Grand =errace to invesz
funds in a 'manner which will provide she highest investment
return with the maximum security while meeting the da_ly
cash flow demands of the CRA and conforming to all scazutes
governing the investment of CRA funds .
2 . 0 SCOPE
This investment policy applies to all financial asse-:S of
the CRA. These funds are audited annually and accoun ed for
in the Comprehensive Annual Report . Funds include the
General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, ,rust Funds, De--:
Service Funds and any other CRA Funds .
3 . 0 PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made with judgment and care -ur_ er
circumstances then prevailing which persons of prudence,
discretion :and intelligence exercise in the manageme-:� of
their own affairs, not for speculation, but for inves�ment,
considering the probable safety of their capital as ::ell
as the probable income to be derived. The standard o=
prudence to be used shall be the "prudent person" standard
and shall be applied in the context c= managing an o-:erall
portfolio. Investment officers actinc in accordance ::ith
written procedures and the investment policy and exercising
due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsib=lity
for an individual security' s credit risk or market price
changes .
4 . 0 OBJECTIVE
The primary objectives, in order of _y-iority, of the
investment activities shall be :
1 . SAFETY: Safety'of principal is the foremost objec=-ve of
the investment program. Investments of the CRA =a11
be undertaken in a manner that peeks to ensure =tee
preservation of capizal in the overall portfol-c . To
attain this objective, diversif-cation is required in
order that potential losses in -ndividual secur-=ies do
not exceed the income generated from the remain der of
the portfolio .
-1- '
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
2 . LIQUIDITY: The investment porgy=olio will remain
sufficiently liquid to enable she CRA to meet all
operating requirements which --.ight be reasonably
anticipated.
3 . YIELD: The investment portfol=o shall be designed with
the objective of attaining a --.arket rate of return
throughout budgetary and econ=ic cycles, taking into
account the investment risk ccnstrain,-s and the cash flc.:
characteristics of the portfo-io.
5 . 0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Authority zo manage the investment of surplus funds is
derived from California Government Code 53601, et seq.
Management of Bond Funds is controlled be Government Code
5922 (d) and such investments muse conform to the
requirements of the bond indenture . In some cases, it may �-
appropriate for investment of bond proceeds to cover a
longer duration than those limits established for
surplus (operating) funds . Manage--.ent responsibility for
the investment program is hereby delegated to the
�} Treasurer, who shall establish procedures and operate the
investment program consistent wi=h this investment policy.
Procedures may include, but not limited zo, references to :
safekeeping, PSA repurchase agreements, :aire transfer
agreements, collateral/'depository agreements and banking
services contracts, as appropria-e . Treasurer may delegate
authority to subordinates for day to day investment
transactions . No person may engage in an investment
transaction except as provided under the terms of this
policy and the procedures establ=shed by the treasurer.
6 . 0 ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Officers and employees involved =n the investment process
shall refrain from personal business that could conflict
with the proper execution of the investment program, or
which could impair their ability to make impartial
investment decisions .
7 .0 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
The Agency will prohibit the ut--izatior_ of outside
investment advisors .
-2-
I
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
i
The Treasurer may select any financial institution/
broker/dealer, selected by credit worthiness, who are
authorized! to provide investment services in the State of
California.
No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public
depository, as established by state laws . For broker/dealers
of government securities and other investments, the
Treasurer shall select only broker/dealers who are licensed
and in good standing with the California Department of
Securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
National Association of Securities Dealers .
8 . 0 AUTHORIZEDiINVESTMENTS:
The CRA of ', Grand Terrace is empowered by statute and
authorized 'by Agency Board to invest in the following:
A. U.S . TREASURY OBLIGATIONS (TREASURY BILLS, TREASURY
NOTES) .
B. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS .
C. CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT WITH STATE BANKS, NATIONAL BANKS,
STATE OR FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS, STATE AND
FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS IN CALIFORNIA, that are fully
insured by federal or state deposit insurance . The
Treasurer may waive collateralization in lieu of
deposit insurance .
D. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, COLLATERALIZED WITH
U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS HAVING A MARKET VALUE OF
110%.
The treasurer may, at his discretion, waive security
for that portion of a deposit that already is covered
by federal or state deposit insurance .
i
E. PASSBOOK SAVINGS ACCOUNTS PLACED WITH FEDERAL OR STATE
BANKS ;OR CREDIT UNIONS, that are fully insured by
federal or state deposit insurance . The Treasurer ma_,,
waive ;collateralization in lieu of deposit insurance .
F. SECURITIES ISSUED BY FEDERAL AGENCIES.
-3-
N
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
G. LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF).,
Special Fund of the State Treasury in which local
agencies are allowed to pool their funds for investment
purposes up to a maximum of $30 Million. LAIF will
have its own investment policy that will differ from
the CRA.
H. MUTUAL FUNDS, issued by diversified management companies
as defined by Section 23701m of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, provided that the portfolio of such
investment company or investment trust is limited to
U. S . government obligations or agencies of the federal
government and repurchase agreements fully
collateralized by such securities .
I . POOLS AND OTHER INVESTMENT STRUCTURES INCORPORATING
• INVESTMENTS PERMITTED IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 53601 AND 53635,
such as Local Government Investment Pools sponsored by
Counties and Joint Powers Authorities . These entities
may have their own investment policy that will
differ from that of the CRA of the City of Grand
Terrace.
9 . 0 COLLATERALIZATION:
All certificates of deposit must be collateralized by U.S .
Treasury obligations held by a third party. The Treasurer my
waive this requirement up to the amount already insured by
federal or state deposit insurance .
10 . SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY:
All securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be
conducted on a delivery VS . payment -(,DVP) basis and
shall be held by a third party custodian designated by the,
Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts . This would
not apply to any book-entry direct purchases from the U.S .
Government .
-4-
I -
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
I
11. DIVERSIFICATION:
i
The CRA will diversify its investments by security type
and institution.
I
12 . INVESTMENTiPOLICY ADOPTION:
The Investment Policy shall be approved by Agency Board and
adopted by resolution of the CRA.
i
This policy has been reviewed and approved by the CRA
Board on February 14, 2002 .
I '
I
i
I '
i
j
i
- s -
I
I
I
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
Adopted by Board 5/08/97
" Amended 6/26/97
Amended 8/27/98
Adopted 9/10/98
Amended 1/25/00
Adopted 1/25/01
- 6 -
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
STAFF REPORT
Finance Department
CRA ITEM(X) COUNCIL ITEM( ) MEETING-DATE : February 14, 2002
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING
JUNE 3 0, 2001
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDD G REQUIRED XX
In accordance with Municipal Code 2.12.030.13, staff is presenting the Financial Audit Report for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 for your review and acceptance, and also as a matter of
public record. The audited report was prepared by the firm of Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP,
Certified Public Accountants, with whom the Agency contracts to perform a financial and
compliance audit. The CRA of the City of Grand Terrace has received the highest possible
` - opinion on its' financial report.
The auditor has rendered an opinion that the financial statements, present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the CRA of the City of Grand Terrace, as of June 30, 2001
and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
This report will be submitted to the State Controller's Office as required by the Single Audit Act
of:1984 and OMB Circular A-128 and A-133, as necessary.
A copy of the CRA financial.statements are available for inspection in the reference section of
the Grand Terrace Library.
Staff Recommends that Board:
ACCEPT THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CRA OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2001.
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. 14
CRA of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
STAFF REPORT
Finance Department
c+T Y
O
GRAHD TERR CE
CRA ITEM(X) COUNCEL ITEM( ) MEETING DATE: February 14. 2002
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: COMBINED CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURE" REPORT FOR
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
The CRA and City are required to present quarterly investment reports to their governing boards
in accordance with Govermnent Code Section 53646 (b)(1)...(3). The report would include all
moneys held by the Agency or City and all moneys held by third parties that belong to the
Agency or City with the exception of any pension or deferred compensation moneys.
This code section requires that:
1) Report must be produced 30 days after end of quarter,
2) Report must comment on compliance with investment policy,
3) Report must comment if agency has ability to meet expenditures for next six months,
4)Report must include a description of the investment, type of investment, issuer,
investment pool or program information, date of maturity and amount invested,
5)Report must include book value and current market value of each investment,
6) Report must indicate source of the market valuation.
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
i
CRA of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
I
Page 2
I
The CRA and City engaged the consulting division of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and
Company, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants (VTD), to assist the agencies in
preparation of a combined investment report. The scope of their work includes a review of
the quarterly investment statements and bank statements, a compliance review with the
'investment policy and government code, obtaining market valuations and preparing the report.
Staff v;-ould like to continue with investment reporting assistance from VTD as long as the State
continues funding reimbursement for this line item.
i
Staff welcomes any questions or comments from the Agency Board.
i
i
I
Staff Recommends that the Agency Board:
Accept the Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for the
Quarter Ended December 31, 2001.
i
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
i
f
I�Ir
f
J
T Itij of branb ('.b erratr
r1ol r am attivin
STATER BROS. MARKETS
65" Golden Anniversary
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets was founded 65 Golden Years ago in 1936 in Yucaipa,San Bernardino
County, California,by twin brothers Cleo and Leo Stater in pursuit of the.American Dream;and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets today is:the largest "LocaQy Oxned"Supermarket Chain in Southern
California,the 2"largest Private Company in Southern California,the 23'largest Supermarket Chain in America,
and the 1'largest Private Company in America,operating 155 Supermarkets and serving 92 communities in the six
Southern California Counties of San Bernardino,Riverside,Orange,Los.Angeles,San Diego and Kern;and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets has served the City of Grand Terrace since 1974 and has consistently
provided its citizens with "Value Priced"Supermarket merchandise as well as provided its citizens with employment
opportunities;and
WHEREAS, Stater Bros. Markets has, with "Hometown Pride,"developed and located the Company's'
Distribution Center in the "Hub City"of Colton, California, where the Distribution Center encompasses over one
million square feet under roof on nearly 96 acres and includes the Company's Grocery,Meat,Produce,Bakery,Deli,
and Health and Beauty Care Distribution Facilities and Stater Bros. General Offices,and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets also operates Stater Bros.Development Company,a Construction and
Real Estate Company which selects,designs and builds the Company's Supermarkets and Shopping Centers using
local construction and building supply companies;and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets is the largest Private Employer in the Inland Empire Counties of San
Bernardino and Riverside and one of the largest Private Employers in Southern California,employing over 13,000
employees throughout the Company;and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros. Markets for over 35 years has provided a Company funded Checker Training
Center where over 15,000 Stater Bros.Employees have been trained to be effuient and courteous checkers and where
in the American Tradition,good skill levels and high work ethics have been stressed in order that these employees
might be successful in their first jobs as well as in their future lives,and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros.Markets is one of the largest purchasers of locally grown agricultural products as
well as one of the largest purchasers of locally supplied goods and services; and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros.Markets is committed to improving the quality of life in the communities it serves
and has donated over twenty million pounds of product to the major Inland Empire Food Bands and continues to•
donate over four million pounds per year;and
WHEREAS,Stater Bros.Markets is proud of the fact that allthe senior management of the Company reside
in the Inland Empire of Southern California and that the vast majority of the senior management ofStater Bros.are.
native Californians, including Jack H.Brown,the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;
NOW, THEREFORE,I,Dan Buchanan,.Kayor ofthe City of Grand Terrace,on behalf ofthe City Counci4
do hereby congratulate Stater Bros. Markets upon celebrating its 65'' Golden Anniversary of serving Southern'
California Families with quality merchandise at the lowest possible prices and wishes them continued success in
serving their valued customers in the future.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace,
< and of the City Council thereof.
This 144`"'day of February,2002.
,Q
APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO203
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
13879 CHRISTIE THIERRY BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00
13880 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY-PARKS 617.71
13881 KEVIN BEARDSLEY VIDEO SERVICES MAY-JAN. 2002 295.00
13884 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS FOR PAYROLL ENDED 1/18/02 4,154.53
13885 PACIFIC BELL PHONE SERVICE-CITY FACILITIES 155.68
13886 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1/31 LEAGUE MEETING-GARCIA 30.00
13887 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION MEALS/SACTO LEAGUE EXPENSES 5,768.61
13888 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH INSURANCE-FEBRUARY 10451.77
13889 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE MHN-FEBRUARY 449.07
13890 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SERVICES VISION & DENTAL INSURANCE FEBRUARY 984.91
13891 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY FEBRUARY 2002 LIFE & DISABILITY INS. 1,461.19
13892 METLIFE EMPLOYEE PAID LIFE INS.-FEBRUARY 290.26
0 13893 LOTUS CAFE FOOD-CHAMBER MIXER 2/6/02 100.00
O 13894 TEUILA'S POLYNESIAN BAKERY FOOD-CHAMBER MIXER 2/6/02 60.00
Z
13895 LA PASTA ITALIA FOOD-CHAMBER MIXER 2/6/02 60.00
n 13896 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA JAN. CELL PHONE SERVICE-CHILD CARE 45.53
F 13898 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 2002 ALL'RISK INSURANCE 31,376.00
a 13899 RICHARD ROLLINS JANUARY OPEN/CLOSE/CLEAN PARKS 936.00
G) 46522 MATTHEW ADDINGTON JANUARY COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 .
Z 46523 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTEMS MAINT. AGREEMENT-POSTAGE MACHINE 460.00
c 46524 AT& T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 14.44
a 46525 BARHAM CONSULTING SERVICES CONSULTANT FEES 3,300.00
46526 BARHAM CONSULTING SERVICES CONSULTANT FEES 260.00
46527 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 153.74
z 46528 CALIF. STATE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES ANNUAL CHILD CARE LICENSE FEE 500.00
0 46530 CENTRATION INC. CONTINGENT FEE-SB90 CLAIMS 13.05
1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO203
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
46532 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE-SUPPLIES 144.05
____46533 _COMPUTER --------REPAIR CU-ROM-&-STAFF-TRAININ-G-C-.-CARE------- 7F0_.00
46534 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION LEGAL AD PUBLICATION FEES 1,447.04
46535 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY COPIER BASIC FEE & PER COPY 52.72
46536 DATA TICKET INC. DEC. TICKET PROCESSING FEE 100.00
46537 DATAPRINT CORP. XEROX INK AND MAP PAPER 215.45
46539 DICKSON COMPANY DEC. SPECIAL SWEEPING SERVICES 45.68
46541 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 68.29
46542 EDEN SYSTEMS ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEE 3,346.59
46543 ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ONLINE CALDAG 2000 CODE BOOK 50.90
46544 ESSCO-REDLANDS INC. 'FLUORESCENT BULBS-CITY HALL 105.06
46545 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSTRUCTION STAKING-BIKE LANE PROJECT 1,600.00
46546 EVER READY EMBROIDERY SHIRTS & JACKETS EMBROIDERY 669.65
46547 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY PARK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 42.44
46548 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHAMBER LUNCHEON-BERRY & FERRE' 14.00
46549 LEE ANN GARCIA REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 44.00
46550 GOLDEN PROTECTIVE SERVICES CHILD CARE CENTER GLOVES 128.98
46551 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORM COMPANY 3 MAINTENANCE CREW JACKETS 115.13
46552 HENAGON LTD COLTON PLASTER SAND 66.44
46554 HOME DEPOT PLANT SUPPLIES-BARTON RD 331.49
46555 HONEYWELL INC. SENIOR CTR & CHILD CARE ANNUAL MAINT. 2,391.33
46556 HYDRO TEK PRESSURE WASHER 2,631.26
46557 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 220.39
46558 INLAND EMPIRE COMPOSTING GROUND COVER & FERTILIZER 60.00
6559 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION BREAD PRODUCTS-CHILD CARE 106.64
46560 JANI-KING OF COLTON CARPET CLEANING-CHILD CARE 800.00
46563 LAWNMOWER CENTER_ LAWNMOWER REPAIRS 25258
2
r
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO203
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
46564 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2002 CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES 4,516.00
46565 LEGEND BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEC. LIBRARY JANITORIAL SERVICE 200.00
46566 LELAND NURSERY TREES/PLANTS-BARTON RD REHAB 3,584.87
46567 MALTON CONSTRUCTION SIDEWALK REPAIRS 81,406.00
46568 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHONE USAGE-CITY FACILITIES 872.09
46569 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY FEBRUARY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 248.96
46570 PACIFIC BELL LOCAL SERVICE/CHARGES 243.55
46571 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH-CITY HALL 231.44
46572 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH-CHILD CARE 121.29
46573 PRESS ENTERPRISE 52 WEEKS DAILY DELIVERY 143.02
46574 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT BIKE STAGING AREAS PRINTS 365.27
46576 ROADRUNNER STORAGE FEBRUARY STORAGE FEE 63.00
46577 ROCKHURST COLLEGE CONTINUING ED COMMUNICATING W/TACT & SKILL-LAMPE 99.00
46578 ROQUET PAVING,INC. ARLISS STREET IMPROVEMENTS 51,589.35
46579 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER DECEMBER BOOKING FEES 1,118.04 mt
46580 S.B. COUNTY"ASSESSOR DECEMBER MAP UPDATES 1.50
46581 S.B. COUNTY INFORMATION SERVICES PAGER ACCESS FEES 330.00
46582 S.B. COUNTY TREASURER - FUEL-CHILD CARE VEHICLES 32.92
46583 S.B. COUNTY WASTE SYSTEMS DIVISION DECEMBER DUMP CHARGES 806.49
. 46584 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. JANUARY SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 363.52
46585 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY AFTER SCHOOL SUPPLIES-CHILD CARE 73.54
46586 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY-CITY FACILITIES 4,642.73
46587 SYSCO FOOD SUPPLIES-CHILD CARE 1,675.90
46588 TAYLOR APPLIANCES MAYTAG DISHWASHER-CHILD CARE 377.13
46589, TEXACO FUEL-HOUSING TRUCK 882.77
46591 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC. CAUTION TAPE-BARTON RD REHAB 25.86
46592 MARY TRAINOR JANUARY COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00
3
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO203
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 14, 2002
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
46593 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING DECEMBER, 2001 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,028.50
46594 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE FOR METER
46595 FRAN VAN GELDER JANUARY COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00
46596 VAVRINEK TRINE DAY & COMPANY AUDIT FEES F/Y 01-02 8,700.00
46598 VIOREL PURACI REFUND DMV FEE PARKING CITE 07380 60.00
46599 WAXIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 370.47
46600 WEARGUARD WORK CLOTHES MAINTENANCE JACKET 837.64
46601 WEST GROUP CA CODE UPDATES 274.24
46602 BRIAN WHITLEY JANUARY COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00
46603 WILLDAN PLAN CHECK 912.50
46604 XEROX CORPORATION COPIER JAN. USAGE/FEB. BASE CHARGE 1,216.33
46605 YOSEMITE WATER BOTTLED WATER CHILD CARE 179.25
SUBTOTAL 172,909.77
JANUARY PAYROLL 129,680.57
GRAND TOTAL $302,590.34
I CERTIFY THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE `
OPERATION OF THE CITY.
LARRY RONNOW
FINANCE DIRECTOR
4
1
'D�IiNIG CITY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE C_ _. ,,;L APPROVAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 24, 2002
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council
Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on January
24, 2002, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Dan Buchanan, Mayor
Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tern
Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Don Larkin, Councilmember
Maryetta Ferre, Councilmember
Tom Schwab, City Manager
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director
Larry Ronnow, Finance Director
Jerry Glander, Building & Safety Director
Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department
> ABSENT: John Harper, City Attorney
The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Pro Tern Lee Ann Garcia, followed by the
Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Herman Hilkey.
ITEMS TO DELETE
City Manager Schwab requested that Council remove item 9A. Personnel Negotiations from
the agenda.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2A. Grand Terrace Home of Distinction Award
Assistant City Manager Berry gave an overview of the Home of Distinction A yard program.
Mayor Buchanan presented the Pitzonka Family at 12446 Pascal Avenue, the first winners
of the Grand Terrace Home of Distinction Award, with a certificate and a gift card from
Stater Brothers and thanked them for showing their community pride.
CONSENT CALENDAR
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N01 3F,
J
Council Minutes
January 24, 2002
Page 2
CC-2002-04 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following consent calendar items:
3A. Approval of Check Register CO202
-3B. Ratify 01-24-2002 CRA Action
3C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
3D. Approval of 01-10-2002 Minutes
3E. Award Contract for Southwest Corner of Barton Road & Michigan Street
Widening & Signal Relocation and Northeast Comer of Barton Road &
Vivienda Street Widening & Storm Drain Inlet (R.J. Nobel Company)
3F. Edison Right-of-Way Amendment
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mario Gomez,22791 Vista Grande Way, he indicated that the house located next to his
property,22775 Vista Grande Way, has been empty for approximately a year and open. He
expressed his concern and possible risk. He requested that something be done.
Gene Carlstrom; 303 Loma Verde, Colton, representing the Grand Terrace Lion's Club,
commended Assistant City Manager Steve Berry for the Tribute to the 9-11 Victims and
presented him with a certificate of Appreciation for all of his work on the tribute. He
reported that Ray Munson passed away this month.
Jim Sullivan, 1951 W.Key Street,Colton,Inland Composting,thanked each of the members
of staff and Couticilmembers that have taken the time to educated themselves regarding his
project in the City of Colton. He indicated that on March 6, 2002 there will be public
information meeting regarding his project for the residents of Grand Terrace that will be held
at Grand Terrace Community Lion's Center on the corner of Barton Road and Vivienda at
7:00 p.m.
ORAL REPORTS ,
5A. Committee Reports - None
COUNCIL REPORTS
Mavor Buchanan, indicated that there was a fire on the railroad bridge recently and that the
railroad is not intending to repair or replace that bridge,which might result in an opportunity
for Grand Terrace to examine whether or not some of the contemplated grade separation
work to repair the bridge on Barton that goes over the railroad and an opportunity to save
some money. He reported that on Tuesday, January 29, 2002, from 6 am to 5 pm the City
will be contracting for road improvements on Barton Road from the Terrace Village Plaza
Council Minutes
January 24,2002
Paoe 3
to the Colton bridge.. It will be open for local traffic and will not be opened for through
traffic. He indicated that Ray Munson passed away and that he had the privilege of serving
on the Planning Commission with Mr. Munson for several years and that he was a
tremendous asset to the Planning Commission and hence the community and he was active
in the Lion's Club and indicated that he will be adjourning the meeting in his honor and
memory.
Mayor Pro Tem Garcia, indicated that she too served on the Commission with Ray Munson
and feels that he will be deeply missed in the community. She requested a status report on
the new Chevron that is being built in town.
Community and Economic Development Director Materassi,indicated that they are clearing
the property and it will depend on how quickly the contractor works.
Mayor Pro Tem Garcia,reported that on February 6,2002 the Chamber Mixer will be hosted
at City Hall and encouraged everyone to attend. She indicated that the Community Sen-ices
Department is working on a fundraiser for the Beautification Fund where a dinner for two
at the Fire Station is being auctioned off.
Councilmember Hilkey, reported that the School District approved the pass through
L.! agreement which will allow us to improve the soccer fields at the middle school. He has
asked Omnitrans to come to a couple of Council Meetings to explain how the Smart Shuttle
works. He encouraged everyone to take advantage of the shuttle. He sends his condolences
to the Munson family.
Councilmember Larkin,he indicated that he would like to see a budget workshop to review
the goals that were set at the last workshop and he would also like to'agendize the no parking
at Mt. Vernon and Canal. He reported that the Chamber of Commerce will be holding a
Grand Opening Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the new Karate Studio on Saturday. He
expressed his condolences to the Munson family.
It was the consensus of the Council to hold a Budget Workshop on February 14, 2002 at 5:00 p.m.
prior to the Council Meeting and to agendize a CIP Workshop for February 28, 2002 at 5:00 p.m.
Councilmember Ferre,sent her condolences to the family of Ray Munson. She commended
Assistant City Manager Berry on his idea of the Valentine Dinner fundraiser.
PUBLIC HEARING -None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None
NEW BUSINESS
Council Minutes
January 24, 2002
Page 4
8A. Resolution in Support of the Statement of Principles for Airport Capacity
Enhancement in Southern California
CC-2002-05 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
HILKEY,CARRIED 5-0,to continue the Resolution in Support of the Statement of
Principles for Airport Capacity Enhancement in Southern California to February 28,
2002.
CLOSED SESSION -'None
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Buchanan adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:30 p.m. in memory and honor of Ray
Munson, until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
February 14, 2002 at 5:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
DATE: February 7,2002
COMM* W.O.# 12.629B
� I��
CITY r. STAFF 'REPORT:..'
GRpMD iERRgC
CPA O COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: February 14,2002
SUBJECT: Phase III Bicycle and Pedestrian staging areas contract award
�pGH
FUNDING REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING REQUIRED _
DEPARTMENT OF Funding will be reimbursed through bicycle grant
BUILDING& SAFETY,
PUBLIC WORKS
AND HOUSING The bicycle lane and pedestrian staging areas have been a work in progress
since 1997 when our first phase was started on Barton Road and Mt. Vernon
22795 Barton Road Avenue. This work has been made possible through grant funds.
Suite B
Grand Terrace Phase H was started in 2001 and should be completed this month.Phase If
California 92313-5295 construction was on Main Street from Michigan Avenue west to the Berlington
Civic Center
(909) 825-3825 Northern Santa Fe Railroad. Another grant has been approved by council for
Fax (909) 825-7506 Phase III which will include the realignment of Grand Terrace Road at Barton
Road to align with Honey Hill Drive, also in this project is the construction of
(5) five bicycle and pedestrian staging areas, including two city entry signs.
The grant for this project is $227,500.00. The design and specifications have
been completed and advertized for bid which will be opened on February 12,
2002. To expedite the project, staff will follow up with a supplemental report
to council on Thursday February 14, 2002 with recommendations.
VB:af
COUPINCL AGENDA 07-EM Noe
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Finance Dept
3 STAFF R:EP RT .
CRA ITEM( ) COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE : February 12, 2002
AGENDA ITEM
e SUBJECT: ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
The Government Code requires that the City Treasurer present an annual Statement of
Investment Policy to the governing body for review. The current investment policy was last
adopted in January 2001.
No. changes are proposed at this time.
f
Staff recommends that Council:
Adopt annual Statement of City Investment Policy
d
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
1. 0 POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Grand Terrace to invest
funds in a manner which will provide the highest investment
return with the maximum security while meeting the daily
cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all statutes
governing the investment of City funds .
2 . 0 SCOPE
This investment policy applies to all financial assets of
the City. :These funds are audited annually and accounted for
in the Comprehensive Annual Report . Funds include the
General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Trust Funds, Debt
Service Funds and any other City Funds .
3 . 0 PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made with judgment and care -under
circumstances then prevailing which persons of prudence,
discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of
their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment,
considering the probable safety of their capital as well ;
as the probable income to be derived. The standard of
prudence to be used shall be the "prudent person" standard
and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall
portfolio.' Investment officers acting in accordance with
written procedures and the investment policy and exercising
due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility
for an individual security' s credit risk or market price
changes .
4 . 0 OBJECTIVE
The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the
investment activities shall be :
1 . SAFETY:: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of
the investment program. Investments of the City shall
be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the
preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To
attain this objective, diversification is required in
order: that potential losses in individual securities do
not exceed the income generated from the remainder of
the portfolio .
-1-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
2 . LIQUIDITY: The investment portfolio will remain
sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all
operating requirements which might be reasonably
anticipated.
3 . YIELD: The investment portfolio shall be designed with
the objective of attaining a market rate of return
a throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into
account the investment risk constraints and the cash flow
characteristics of the portfolio .
5 . 0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Authority to manage the investment of surplus funds is
derived from California Government Code 53601, et seq.
Management of Bond Funds is controlled be Government Code
5922 (d) and such investments must conform to the
requirements of the bond indenture. In some cases, it may be
appropriate for investment of bond proceeds to cover a
longer duration than those limits established for
surplus (operating) funds . Management responsibility for
the investment program is hereby delegated to the
Treasurer, who shall establish procedures and operate the
investment program consistent with this investment policy.
Procedures may include, but not limited to, references to :
safekeeping, PSA repurchase agreements, wire transfer
agreements, collateral/depository agreements and banking
services contracts, as appropriate. Treasurer may delegate
authority to subordinates for day to day investment
transactions . No person may engage in an investment
transaction except as provided under the terms of this
policy and the procedures established by the treasurer.
6 . 0 ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
officers and employees involved in the investment process
shall refrain from personal business that could conflict
with the proper execution of the investment program, or
which could impair their ability to make, impartial
investment decisions .
7 . 0 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
The Agency will prohibit the utilization of outside
investment advisors .
-2-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
The Treasurer may select any financial institution/
broker/dealer, selected by credit worthiness, who are
authorized to provide investment services in the State of
California.
No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public
depository as established by state laws . For broker/dealers
of government securities and other investments, the
Treasurer shall select only broker/dealers who are licensed
and in good standing with the California Department of
Securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
National Association of Securities Dealers .
8 . 0 AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS:
The City of Grand Terrace is empowered by statute and
authorized by Council to invest in the following:
A. U.S . TREASURY OBLIGATIONS (TREASURY BILLS, TREASURY
NOTES) .
B. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS .
C. CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT WITH STATE BANKS, NATIONAL BANKS,
STATE OR FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS, STATE AND
FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS IN CALIFORNIA, that are fully
insured by federal or state deposit insurance. The
Treasurer may waive collateralization in lieu of
deposit insurance .
D. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, COLLATERALIZED WITH
U.S . TREASURY OBLIGATIONS HAVING A MARKET VALUE OF
110%.
The treasurer may, at his discretion, waive security
for that portion of a deposit that already is covered
by federal or state deposit insurance .
E. PASSBOOK SAVINGS ACCOUNTS PLACED WITH FEDERAL OR STATE
BANKS OR CREDIT UNIONS, that are fully insured by
federal or state deposit insurance . The Treasurer may
waive collateralization in lieu of deposit insurance .
F. SECURITIES ISSUED BY FEDERAL AGENCIES .
-3-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
G. LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) ,
Special Fund of the State Treasury in which local
agencies are allowed to pool their funds for investment
purposes up to a maximum of $30 Million. LAIF will
have its own investment policy that will differ from
the City.
H. MUTUAL FUNDS, issued by diversified management companies
as defined by Section 23701m of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, provided that the portfolio of such
investment company or investment trust is limited to
U.S . government obligations or agencies of the federal
government and repurchase agreements fully
collateralized by such securities .
I . POOLS AND OTHER INVESTMENT STRUCTURES INCORPORATING
INVESTMENTS PERMITTED IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 53601 AND 53635,
such as, Local Government Investment Pools sponsored by
Counties and Joint Powers Authorities . These entities
may have their own investment policy that will
differ from that of the City of Grand Terrace .
9 . 0 COLLATERALIZATION:
All certificates of deposit must be collateralized by U. S .
Treasury obligations held by a third party. The Treasurer my
waive this requirement up to the amount already insured by
federal or state deposit insurance .
10 . SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY:
All securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be
conducted on a delivery VS . payment (DVP) basis and
shall be held by a third party custodian designated by the
Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts . This would
not apply to any book-entry direct purchases from the U. S .
Government .
-4-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
11. DIVERSIFICATION:
The City will diversify its investments by security type
and institution.
12 . INVESTMENT. POLICY ADOPTION:
The Investment Policy shall be approved by Council and
adopted by, resolution of the City.
This policy has been reviewed and approved by the City
Council on, February 14, 2002 .
- 5 - ,
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
INVESTMENT POLICY
Adopted by council 5/08/97,
Amended 6/26/97
Amended 8/27/98
Adopted 9/10/98
Amended 1/27/00
Adopted 1/25/01
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Finance Dept
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE : February 14, 2002
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING
JUNE 30, 2001
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
In accordance with Municipal Code 2 .12 .030 .B, staff is
presenting the Financial Audit Report for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2000 for your review and acceptance, and as a matter of
public record. The audited report was prepared by the firm of
Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co. , LLP, Certified Public Accountants, with
whom the Agency contracts to perform a financial and compliance audit .
The City of Grand Terrace has received the highest possible opinion on
its financial report.
The auditor has rendered an opinion that the financial statements,
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the City of Grand Terrace, as of June 30, 2001 and the results of its
operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles .
This report will be submitted to the State Controller' s Office as
required by the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-128 and
A-133 as necessary.
Staff Recommends that Council :
ACCEPT THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 .
c M NO.NUIAMEI
STAFF REPORT
CRA ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: February 14, 2002
SUBJECT: Purchase of Floor Cleaning Equipment for the Grand Terrace
Community Pride Program
FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED
Background:
The Community Services department is accepting a donation of$925 from Joann
Johnson to purchase a floor machine and steam cleaner. In order to obtain the supplier
discount of 18% for the machines, the city must purchase the equipment for$925 thus
increasing our appropriations to account 10-180-710. This is a capital item and will be
included in the city's fixed asset inventory.
Once we receive the equipment, Joann Johnson will issue a check for the full amount
which will be used to reimburse account# 10-700-01.
The net cost to the city will be zero.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends purchasing the equipment and thanking Joann Johnson for her
donation to help keep the floors and carpets at the Senior Center and City Hall clean.
Requests Council approve the additional appropriation of$925 and offsetting revenue
reimbursement for the same amount.
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
STAFF REPORT-
Finance Department
0
GRAHD TERR CE
CRA ITEM( ) COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: February 14, 2002
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: COMBINED CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT FOR
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
The CRA and City are required to present quarterly investment reports to their governing boards
in accordance with Government Code Section 53646 (b)(1)...(3). The report would include all
moneys held by the Agency or City and all moneys held by third parties that belong to the
Agency or City with the exception of any pension or deferred compensation moneys.
This code section requires that:
1) Report must be produced 30 days after end of quarter,
2) Report must comment on compliance with investment policy,
3) Report must comment if agency has ability to meet expenditures for next six months,
4)Report must include a description of the investment, type of investment, issuer,
investment pool or program information, date of maturity and amount invested,
5) Report must include book value and current market value of each investment,
6) Report must indicate source of the market valuation.
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Page 2
The CRA and City engaged the consulting division of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and
Company, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants (VTD), to assist the agencies in
preparation of a combined investment report. The scope of their work includes a review of
the quarterly investment statements and bank statements, a compliance review with the
investment policy and government code, obtaining market valuations and preparing the report.
Staff would like to continue with investment reporting assistance from VTD as long as the State
continues funding reimbursement for this line item.
The report is included with the CRA agenda item.
Staff welcomes any questions or comments from the City Council.
Staff Recommends that the City Council:
Accept the Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for the
Quarter Ended December 31, 2001.
DATE: February 5, 2002
W.O.# 12.629
A,-T
CIT R OR �2,, ,
CRA O COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: February 28, 2002
SUBJECT: Right-of-way dedication north-easterly comer Grand-Terrace Road &
1"kOUCH Barton Road(Honey Hill Drive)
DEPARTMENT OF FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
BUILDING&SAFETY,
PUBLIC WORKS The City of Grand Terrace was awarded a Transportation Development Act(TDA) Article 3
AND HOUSING
4 program grant, through SANBAG,for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian staging areas.
22795 Barton Road As part of that project the city is to acquire the right-of-way.
Suite B
Grand Terrace One portion of this project is the realignment of Grand Terrace Road to align with Honey Hill
California 92313-5295 Drive at Barton Road which would provide a safer intersection for vehicular traffic and pedestriai
Civic Center crossing. This would require the acquisition of right-of-way across private property.
(909) 825-3825
Fax (909) 825-7506 Through negotiations with the property owner, staff was able to acquire the necessary right-of-
way in exchange for the street improvements.Attached for your review is the signed and notarize
grant deed, legal description and plat map.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Accept the Grant Deed for dedication of right-of-way.
2. Direct the City Clerk to record the documents.
VB:af
C-0 Lrliciil C L A�i Q,'E7.1 MDA 5T E M N 0,,
ni
i
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Grand Terrace i
22795 Barton Road '
Grand Terrace,CA-92313 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINETOR RECORDER'S USE
APN:276-401-01 ,
GRANT DEED ;
FOR A VALUABL.EiCONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Thomas L. Alley andjMary Anne Alley,Trustees of the Thomas L. Alley and Mary Anne Alley
Declaration of Trust dated November 23, 1983
hereby GRANT(S) to the City of Grand Terrace, a Municipal Corporation for Public Streets and
Public Utility Purposes
+ r I
the real property in the City of Grand Terrace County of San Bernardino, State of California,
described as on Exhiliit "A" and shown,on Exhibit "B", both are attached and by this reference
made apart.hereof.
BY;Ik G 4�" Date: 1 2-�1 2 902 By: /4<
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
BY
Mayor, City of Grand Terrace
State of California
County of San ply le
�')ss.
i
On 0 w ctrl before me,the undersi one l a Notary Public in and for said State,personally
appeared''? v-(Y)at �; L *_ & o be the persomwhose name is subscribed to
the within instrument a it ackno ledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity,and that by
his signature on'the instrument the person,or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted,executed the
instrument. J
I
WITNESS my hand and official seal
CAK
-cam
Lo•�.�c«.m,► -
Comar. Oct d,
i
I
1 �
EXHIBIT A
THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 OF THE VISTA GRANDE TRACT BEING A
RESUBDIVISION OF THE "BULLIS SUBDIVISION"IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RECORDED IN MAP BOOK
17,PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF GRAND TERRACE ROAD,
BEING DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 10053'48"EAST. 92.00 FEET FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF VISTA GRANDE WAY, ALSO BEING THE COMMON CORNER OF
LOTS 10, 12 AND 15 OF SAID TRACT;
THENCE SOUTH 81009'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 21.25 FEET ALONG THE
WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED BY INSTRUMENT NUMBER 83-284016, OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF GRAND TERRACE ROAD BEING PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET EASTERLY,
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID CENTERLINE,SAID POINT BEING THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 10053'48"EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 492.65 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
BARTON ROAD , BEING PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY,
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES,FROM SAID CENTERLINE OF BARTON ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 28038'37"EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE A DISTANCE OF 165.26 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 61°21'23"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 20 00 FEET
NORTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID NORTHWESTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARTON ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 28038'37"WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF
52.97 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 24 00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 117-47' 26", AN ARC LENGTH OF 49.34 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 56^ 26' 03"
WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 220 40 '09"AN ARC LENGTH OF 27.70 FEET TO A
P:\G\GRTR0002\Word\legal.doc
i •
i
i
LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 10.00 FEET EASTERLY,MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES,
FROM SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF GRAND TERRACE ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 10"53'48" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE,A DISTANCE OF
356.73 FEET TO A .POINT ON SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PREVIOUSLY
MENTIONED PAkCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED BY INSTRUMENT NUMBER 83=284016
OFFICIAL RECORDS;
THENCE NORTH 810 09'18"WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF
10.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ATTACHED HERETO IS A PLAT LABELED EXHIBIT`B"AND BY THIS REFERENCE f
MADE PART HEREOF.
CONTAINING 0.20 ACRES.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSGCIATES, INC.
l
RANDY W D,P.L.S.
L.S.NO.7653 EXPIRES 12-31-04 �
I •
if
I
I
I
i
P\G\GM000AWordVegal.doc
POR. LOT 10
VISTA
gNDE
POC / tiOO
�p0 TPOB
!7 N81'09'18"W 10.62'
SGP�F. N
0\p� o FOR, LOT 12
NORTHERLY LINE
O INST. NO.83-284016,
uO �O 1p OFFICIAL RECORDS
O �o. `?o �o�/15TA GRANDE TRACT M.B. 17/ 10
2� SOP' POR. LOT 12
�P
n � S56'26'03"W (RAD)
A 0
aQ� 4
0 `_ s EXIST. R/W
N28'38'37'E 165.26 0 0
N28'38'37"E M "' BARTON ROAD
o
Ln
30' 30' EXIST. R/W
HONEY HILL
DRIVE
CURVE DATA LEGEND BEARINGIDISTANCE
0=117.47'26" ® INDICATED AREA Ot S10-53'48'E 92.00'
R=24.00' TO BE ACQUIRED
L=49.34' POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT Q2 S81-09'18"E 21.25'
T=39.78' TPOB TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
0 0=22-40'09" 03 N61-21'23"W 20.00'
R=70.00'
L=27.70' ® S28-38'37'W 52.97'
T=14.03'
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SHEET NO.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE .OF
_ RIGHT OF WAY DAVID EVANS EXHIBIT GRTR0002
Rye DRAWN BY•
31iN j AND ASSOCIATES INC. B ACQUISITION MLP
/p� •?� DATE.
CLIENT
12-07-01
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE SCALE:—
I" = 1001
DATE: February 7, 2002
11 W.O.# 12-5.5781
STAFF'-_.REPORT
CITY � _ : !' •,'.F _ ,.
GRAND TERRAC CR O COUNCIL rrEM(X) MEETING DATE: February 14, 2002
SUBJECT: 23190 Westwood Street Conditional Encroachment Agreement-
1pUGH xpUS Berdj and Deborah Seuylemezian
DEPARTMENT OF FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
BUILDING &SAFETY,
PUBLIC WORKS
AND HOUSING Back round
22795 Barton Road Berdj and Deborah Seuylemezian owners of 23190 Westwood Street were
Suite B
Grand Terrace granted approval by the Planning Department to construct a wrought iron fence
California 92313-5295 with concrete block columns within the public right-of-way. A "Conditional
Civic Center Encroachment Agreement"is required to protect the city against any future
(909) 825-3825 liability and is hereby submitted for council approval.
Fax (909) 825-7506
STAFF RECOMV NIENDS THAT COUNCIL:
1. Accept the "Conditional Encroachment Agreement'.
2. Direct the City Clerk to record said agreement after the mayor has
signed it.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Attention: City Clerk
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
CONDITIONAL ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
The City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation (hereafter called"City", with
offices at City Hall,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,92313-5295,gives authorization
to property owner to encroach within the public road right-of-way fronting on the real property
located in the City of Grand Terrace,County of San Bernardino,State of California,and is described
as follows:
See attached "EXHIBIT A"
1. Authorization is granted and conditioned for the purpose of doing the following work:
A. Construct a wrought iron fence with concrete block columns along entire length of
Permittee's property at a wall height not to exceed six feet (6), measured from
ground level adjacent to fence and at a minimum distance of(5)measured from edge
of curb to concrete block columns, per"EXHIBIT B" see attached drawing.
This permit is to be strictly construed and no work other than that specifically mentioned above is
authorized hereby. Performance of the work shall be deemed to be acceptance by the permittee of
all terms and conditions of this agreement.
B. Permittee/Property Owner shall notify and obtain clearance from Utility Companies
regarding location of their underground facility in the proposed wall construction
area prior to excavation work for wall footing construction. Permittee is not allowed
to perform any work under this permit unless clearance is obtained from utility
companies,i.e.S.C.E.,Pacific Bell,Adelphia and Southern California Cas Company.
C. Permittee/Property Owner shall use attached Drawing for construction of the fence.
2. Request of Permittee to construct'the fence within CITY right-of-way has been field
reviewed and approval is granted to proceed with the work subject to the following
conditions:
A. All work to be accomplished within public road right-of-way shall be
accomplished to the satisfaction of the City of Grand Terrace.
B. Permittee/Property Owner also agrees to remove and/or relocate any and/or all of the
improvements authorized under this permit upon written demand of the City of
Grand Terrace in the event of future roadway improvements. The removal and/or
relocation of said improvements shall be accomplished at no expense to the City.
C. Permittee/Property Owner agrees to indemnify City, its officers, agents, and
_ employees against and hold 'them free and harmless of and from all claims and
liabilities of any kind arising out of,in connection with or resulting from negligence
on part of Permittee, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in connection
with any claim undertaken under this permit, and defend City and its officers,
commissions, agents,and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for
damages, and pay all court costs and counsel fees.
Address: 23190 Westwood
Assessor's No. 0276-321-04-0000
Names(s) of Owner(s) of record: Berth Seuylemezian and Deborah Seuylemezian
BqBerdji �Ouoemezian
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
l By:
> / Mayor,Dan Buchanan
Deborah ylemezi
State of California )
County of San Bernardino )ss.
City of Grand Terrace )
On r Zak- L ,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared
t,�; '0�3cJt"4cr5•�L�� .nLc H�,personally known tome to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity,and that by his signature
on the instrument the person,or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted,executed the instrument.
WIT ESS my ban -and 9Tficial seal
% DENISE COBLEY
l Al r Comma 1260185 p�
li il/ ="� NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA !1!
15 . San Bernardino County
«,,.. My Comm.Expires April 9,2004 �
"EXHIBIT A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, described as follows:
Parcel No. 1:
Lot 26, Tract No. 6213, in the County of San Bernardino, State of
California, as per plat recorded in book 80 of Maps,pages 17 and
18,Records of said County.
Excepting therefrom that portion described as follows:
Beginning at the most westerly corner of said Lot 26,said corner being the point of
intersection of the northerly line of Westwood Street, 60.00 feet wide, with the north line
of the southeast l/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 1 south,Range 4 west,
San;Bernardino Base and Meridian;thence north 89 deg. 53'45" east along the north line
of said Lot 26, a distance of 166.79 feet to the point of intersection of said north line of
Lot 26 with the easterly line of that certain 10.00 foot wide
easement for pipe lines purposes conveyed to the Riverside IIighland Water Company by
deed recorded July 26, 1957, instrument no. 339,in book 4289, pages 124 and 125,
Official Records.of said County;thence south 36 deg. 44'55"west along said easterly
line of the Riverside Highland Water Company easement and its southwesterly
prolongation a distance of 60.40 feet to the point of intersection of said southwesterly
prolongation with said northerly line of Westwood Street;thence northwesterly along
said northerly line of Westwood Street, along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest
with a radius of 1030.00 feet from an initial tangent that bears north 65 deg. 54'59"west
through
a central angle of 7 deg. 45'01", a distance of 139.33 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel No. 2.
That portion of the northeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33,Township 1 south,
Range 4 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State
of California, according to Government Survey, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the easterly line of Lot 1, Tract No. 6471, as per plat
recorded in book'82 of Maps,pages 98 and 99,Records of said County and the north line
of Lot 26, Tract No. 6213, as per plat recorded in book 80 of Maps, pages 17 and 18,
Records of said County; thence north 36 deg. 44'55" east along the easterly line of Lot 1
of said Tract No. 6471, a distance of 31.11 feet to an angle point therein; thence north 00
deg. 49' 3 5"west along the easterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 54.27 feet to the
northeast corner thereof, thence
south 43 deg. 52'27" east along the southeasterly prolongation of the northeasterly line of
Page 1 of 2
said Lot 1, a distance of 109.63 feet to an intersection with the north line of Lot 26 of said
Tract No. 6213;thence south 89 deg. 53'45"west along the north line of said Lot 26, a
distance of 93.81 feet to the point of beginning.
APN: 0276-321-04-0-00
Page 2 of 2
♦8 `9 1
�4
tq
25
B o23 �
I
CITY OF GRAND TERRI,CL
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee J AN 2 2 2002
Minutes for January 7, 2002
CITY CLERK
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Pauline Grant at 7:00 p.m. Those present were
Pauline, Ann Petta, Barbara Tinsley, Frances Carter, Brenda Stanfill, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen
Edmundson,and Hannah Laister. The first several minutes were spent looking at pictures of the City
Birthday Party taken by Shelly and Hannah.
Secretary's Minutes: The minutes for December were read and approved as read on motion by
Ann, seconded by Frances, all in favor.
Treasurer's Report: Shows a total of$176.04 in Petty Cash after most of the Birthday Party bills
were paid, and$1,003.01 in the Budget.
Historical Report:Frances brought in a girl scout picture of a tree planting ceremony 3/16/85. Ann
brought in an aerial map dated 1989 which was a fund raiser for the Chamber of Commerce.
Report on the Birthday Party: Ann reported 110 people in attendanceall remarked on the
decorations. In the future we will need two warming trays which we decided not to buy as Frances
said she had some. However,we do need serving spoons, 8 more,and 4 serving forks. Also,heavy
duty foil, as well as more punch. Colleen made a motion to purchase forks and spoons, seconded
by Ann, all in favor. Decorations should be completed by 5 p.m. An announcement will be made
that the Mayor will start the buffet line. Thank You's will be sent to Phyllis Sternberg and Liz
Larkin for all their help.
Art Show May 51h: Need applications, flyers and posters. Application will be in the February
newsletter. Brenda will make the exhibit name tags in larger print. Ann will need applications by
April 1 so she can prepare. Type of painting is very important by applicant. Fifty posters will be
made to put around town.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Next meeting will be February 4, 2002.
Respectfully Submitted,
Hannah Laister
Secretary
C,`-')U1NC9L AGENDA ITEM NJ,������
STAFF.REPORT
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: February 14, 2002
SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
The League of California Cities Inland Empire Division Legislative Task Force met on January 24,
2002. Two important issues were decided regarding legislative activities. First, all Division cities
are being asked to add a standard agenda item on the first council meeting of each month entitled
"Legislative Update." This will allow your LTF members to share current legislative activities with
the Council and keep legislative activities in the forefront.
The Task Force also adopted"2002-2003 Legislative Priorities." These are very similar to Division
priorities adopted in October 2000 and currently posted on the League of California Cities website.
The Task Force unanimously adopted these priorities and each Division City is being asked to have
their respective City Councils ratify these Legislative Priorities and the action of their Legislative
Task Force representatives.
An outline of the action items from the January 241'meeting is attached for your information.
Requested Council Action:
f I. Ratify the Legislative Task Force"2002-2003 Legislative Priorities."
2. Seek to have $1,200 or more placed into the city budget for legislative lobbying trips to
Sacramento.
3. Have a Legislative Update agenda item on the first meeting of each month.'
it
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA,CITIES
INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION
LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE
ACTION ITEMS FROM JANUARY 24, 2002 MEETING
I
1. League Division Legislative Priorities
i
ACTION: Each Legislative Task Force (LTF) city to approve of direction,of
Legislative Task Force:
f
• Ratify Legislative Priorities adopted by LTF on January 24, 2002
(see attached)
• Seek to budget minimum of$1,200-1,500 in each city's budget
to pay for legislative trips to Sacramento
• i Place a "Legislative Update" section on the first meeting of the
i month of each city's Council meetings to allow the LTF
t member(s) to report on legislative activities.
2. Protection of Revenue-(see attached report by Sam Racadio, City Manager,
Highland)
ACTION: !League Board of Directors to vote on initiative at Directors Board
(Meeting in Long Beach
3. Housing (see attached report by Daniel Carrigg, League of California Cities)
ACTION:
• i LTF member cities to provide input, if any, on draft language.
Comments may be e-mailed to Britt Wilson at the City of
Rancho Cucamonga at bwilson@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
• i LTF member cities to ensure that comprehensive Housing
Element legislation/reforms is one of the top legislative priorities
k for your city.
• LTF member cities to make contact with local legislators on
importance of Housing Element reform and asking them to
continue to oppose any damaging legislation like SB 910.
I -
4. Transportation (see attached report by Darren Kettle, SANBAG)
ACTION: LTF member cities should support Proposition 42 (dedicates state's
share of sales tax to local transportation projects). Cities are asked
to put this on their respective agendas in a "non-consent" section
so that the issue gets the attention it merits.
Attachments:
1 . LTF Adopted Legislative Priorities
2. Sam Racadio Report on Fiscal Reform
3. Daniel Carrigg Report on Housing
4. Darren Kettle Report on Transportation Issues (to
come under separate cover)
ATTACHMENT 1
INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION
2002-2003 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
REPRESENTING THE CITIES OF: Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Grand
Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga,
Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Upland and Yucaipa
PRIORITY: Stabilization and Protection of Local Government Revenues.
The.Division will work in partnership with the State League to formulate a
solution to state and local government fiscal reform that will stabilize and
protect local government revenues.
MONITOR:
■ Local Control.
The Division will work to restore and protect local control, authority, decision
making, and will oppose efforts by other governmental entities to diminish it.
■ Reduction of Low-income Housing Concentration in the Inland Empire.
The Division will work in partnership with SANBAG to address the
concentration of low-income housing in the Inland Empire region caused by
flaws in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
■ Expansion of Local,Government Funding Sources for Transportation.
The Division will pursue expansion of funding options available to local
governments to maintain the transportation infrastructure.
■ Enhancement of Alameda Corridor East Financing.
The Division will work in partnership with regional associations as well as the
state and federal governments to obtain additional construction funds to
mitigate the impact of increased goods movement through the Inland Empire.
■ Economic Development/Jobs
The Division will pursue legislation to facilitate job creation and economic
development in the Inland Empire, with the goal of improving the jobs/housing
balance in the region.
■ Endangered Species
The Division will support legislation that enables cities to protect endangered
species through development of species habitat plans that mitigate negative
impacts on community land use.
Approved by the Legislative Task Force at its January 24, 2002 meeting.
Report by Sam Racadio, City Manager, Highland
"We are involved in a most important work."
Somebody famous must have said that. If not, he or she should have. The
statement kind of describes what we are all doing right now.
We are facing great challenges, but what an exciting time it is to be in City
Management. The challenges are exhilarating and exciting. Below are some key
issues we are all dealing with and ones that have been and will continue to be a
major part of the League Board agenda.
Fiscal Reform Initiative.
This issue is the most important issue we will be dealing with over the next few
months. As many of you know, we have been working on a fiscal reform initiative for
local government revenue protection for the past two years with the Fiscal Reform
Initiative Task Force. For over a year CSAC has been an active partner. Three
months ago the discussions were stalled as the Public Safety and Protection Act
(1/4 cent sales tax for public safety) was unveiled by California Sheriffs, California
Health Care Assn., PORAC, California Professional Firefighters and a few others.
The basic concern expressed by cities was the Public Safety Act, although it raised
new revenue, had an onerous public safety maintenance of effort (MOE)
requirement. But the most concern expressed was because it "protected" only
public safety revenue from State recession-time local government revenue raids.
League staff worked with the public safety coalition to widen the definition of"public
safety" for calculation of the MOE and the revenue protection. Because of their
work, indirect costs were added as well code enforcement/building & safety costs. It
was estimated that it would protect about 60% to 80% of cities revenues from the
State and the expanded MOE would include other costs than just.pure public safety.
During the three days of the League of California Cities Annual Conference there
were five meetings in which the issue was discussed in great detail - the Board
meeting, the City Manager's Business meeting, one workshop dedicated just to the
issue, the Resolution Committee meeting and-the General Business meeting.
After hours of discussion and debate I feel the two most important issues raised
(although there were many) were:
• If the Public Safety Act was passed as drafted, cities would lose their"shield"
as far as protection from State revenue raids. Clearly the Legislature and
Governor feel (as,does the general public apparently) that the most important
function's cities provide is police and fire protection. If those-public safety
services were funded by a special sales tax source (estimates of anywhere to
i
three to six times COPS) and protected by an MOE, then the remaining City
revenues for finance, administration, animal control, planning, street
maintenance, library, recreation, arts, etc., etc., etc. would be subject to
unprecedented State take aways. In other words, public safety is the only
service that engenders support for cities, thus it is needed in the political fight
for revenue protection. Without full constitutional protection of 1ocal revenues,
the salestax and MOE would actually hurt Cities.
s From the',other side, if the general membership voted to consider only full
revenue protection, then the staff and League Board would be constrained, as
far as, negotiating with a coalition that has substantial public support and a lot
of potential funding for an initiative. Perhaps a deal could be construct that
provided 95% revenue protection and brought cities an additional 5% or more
in sales tax for public safety. It was an issue of negotiation flexibility.
In the final analysis, the vote was overwhelmingly in favor of limiting any agreement
on an initiative to including full revenue protection.
Not too long after the League took its position, the coalition of public safety groups
supporting the Public Safety Act fell apart. Now the.League, hopefully with CSAC,
may consider a November 2002 initiative to protect 100% of local revenue.
The issue will be discussed in great detail at the February League Board meeting. I
will report at ouriCity Managers Department Conference the outcome.
VLF and the State Budget
Governor Davis.addressed the cities at the Annual Conference., He indicated that
although we needed to share the pain, we would not be the scapegoats. He also
said he would not take the VLF. Here's what was reported in the December 20,
2001 Sacramento Bee:
"At the annual League of California Cities convention in Sacramento, Governor
Davis said, "I am going to treat local government as a full partner, not a scapegoat,"
when it comes to, balancing the budget. He also promised not to touch vehicle
licensing fees." I -
. I
A press release on this issue and a sample letter from our Mayors was prepared by
the League. If for some reason you did not get a copy, contact your Grass Roots
Regional Representatives. It would be a good idea to work with your Regional
Representatives and try to get your local Chamber of Commerce, Unions,
Businesses, etc.!to also write the Governor thanking him for his commitment to local
government. Start working on your Legislators also. Now is the time to act!
Do not get complacent. Remember that the State is still facing a $12 billion or more
deficit.
Grassroots Network:
The Grass Roots Regional Representatives were very prevalent at the Annual
Conference. I was at four meetings in which they were introduced and I suspect
they were at many others.
We will be fortunate to have them at our February City Managers Department
Conference.
-- This program is critically important for the future of Cities. Each of us needs to work
to help make them successful. If they and the program are successful, we will be
successful.
However, they are not just additional staff to do some-of our work. They are to
coordinate and motivate. We still need to do the work, write the letters, talk to the
people to support our issues, and form support_groups for our cause of sound
government.
Make sure the Regional Representatives are regular attendees at your City Manager
Area Group meetings. Include them on your list file for a-mails to other City
Managers. Keep them involved and work with them.
About a year ago the Inland Empire Division began a Legislative Task Force
composed of Council Members and City Managers, which meet monthly. Now that
the Regional Representative on board, she participates in each of these meetings.
This gives the Division Representatives a monthly opportunity to discuss what is
going on and plan activities for the future. If you would like to find out more about
this, contact your Regional Representative.
Submitted by, Sam Racadio
City Manager Department Director, City of Highland
Update On Legislative Housing. Discussions
For Inland Empire.Meeting
by
Daniel Carrigg, Legislative Representative
What the League is advocating for:
In the housing working group discussions, the League, the Califomia State Association of
Counties, the California Association of Councils of Governments, and.the American
Planning Association are all working together as a coalition to advocate for the Legislature
to:
1) Develop fiscal tools and incentives to assist local governments in their efforts to
encourage housing and finance the infrastructure to support housing, as well
as establish an ongoing state commitment to funding affordable housing.
2) Implement comprehensive reforms to the housing element process to:
• address conflicts between local growth projections and state regional
housing need (RHNA) numbers,
• resolve the problems associated,with the distribution of RHNA units within a
council of governments,
• achieve improvements to the housing element review process, and
• develop a neutral dispute resolution process and fair enforcement
altematives to deal with disputes over questions of compliance.
3) Require state laws and policies which affect housing and land use to be
internally consistent.
4) Establish additional legal protections to local agencies that approve affordable
housing and that establish local pro-active affordable housing policies.
Status of Working Group Discussions:
• SB 910 (Dunn) is parked in the Assembly Local Government Committee, and
referred as well to the Assembly Housing Committee. Senator Dunn has
another vehicle, SB 262 (Dunn), parked in the Assembly Housing Committee.
(The deadline to move Senate Bills out of Assembly Policy Committees is
June 28th.)
• The Legislative Lowenthal/Wiggins working group has been meeting over the
fall and there has been some productive discussions on changes of how the
RHNA is developed and how it should be allocated. The League has taken
the lead on writing language to reflect these discussions, but it has been
tricky. Cities, counties and COGs all want reforms to the RHNA process, but
its been a balancing act attempting to maintain consensus on the specific
language to resolve the problems. However, it is critical that we maintain
consensus between local governments on the reforms we advocate for. (/
have attached the most recent draft of our proposed language on RHNA
reform. An earlier version of this draft received positive responses from the
cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Chino Hills.)
• The chair's of the working group have requested local government groups to
produce and-distribute our suggested language on RHNA reform to the
members of the working group by February 8th, in advance of the group's
next meeting on February 14th. We have also been asked to place our
specific proposals for reforms to the HCD housing element review process on
the table,on the 8th as well.
,I
Next Steps:
j
1) An overall discussion of the League's policies and objectives on housing
element reform will be discussed at the League's committee on Housing,
Community and Economic Development on January 24th in San Jose. The
featured speaker will be Senator Joe Dunn.
2) Following the HCED committee meeting, any proposed changes to the
League's existing policy on housing elements will be forwarded to the League
Board at their meeting on February 1 &2.
3) In order to assist League staff with policy decisions related to proposed
language; a subcommittee of the HCED policy committee will meet in
Sacramento on Friday, February 8th. Hopefully, Lee Ann Garcia will be able to
attend that meeting to represent the Inland Empire.
What Can Inland!Empire Cities Do to Help:
1) Make sure that comprehensive housing element reform,is one of your top
legislative priorities for 2002.
2) Talk with your legislators about the importance of housing element reform, and
to continue to oppose any penalty bill like SB 910.
I
3) Invite Julie Bornstein to your next meeting, to foster a cooperative dialogue on
housing issues. To obtain significant reforms to the law, we need to maintain a
cooperative and positive relationship with the Administration.
I
4
i
I -
i -
i
DRAFT#2 ,
Developing RHNA Numbers
NEW Section 65584
(a) On or after January 1. 200X. the regional housing needs shall be established pursuant to
this section at least 180 days prior to the scheduled update of a regional transportation plan
Pursuant to subdivision(b). For the purposes of subdivision(a)-of Section 65583, the share of
a city or county of the regional housing needs includes that share of the proiected housing
need of persons at all income levels within the region under the iurisdiction of the council of
-governments within the planning period. For purposes of this article, the regional housing
needs•is a proiection developed for local planning purposes to represent the reasonably-
anticipated proiected demand for housing within a region based upon projected population
during the planning period. It is recognized, however, that regional housing needs
established for planning purposes may not equal future housing production within.a region,
due to many factors which affect housing production, including: local economies, market
demand, land supplies, availability of adequate public infrastructure,availability of public
subsidies, and other factors.
(b) The development and distribution of regional housing needs by a council of-governments
shall be established and distributed every six years in coniunction with a triennial update of
the regional transportation plan. WAITING FOR RUSTY-IS,LANGUAGE PROPOSING SPECIFIC
TIMELINE, CORRECT SITES, ETC.Any council of-government which is required bystatute to
update its transportation plan every four years, may elect to either(i) adopt the update to its
transportation plan on a three-year basis.'or(H) continue with the four-year update cycle, but
adopt an amended update in mid:cycle to coordinate with the regional housing need update at
six-year intervals..
For areas with no council of-governments, the department shall define the regional housing
need for cities and counties within these areas every six years pursuant to the provisions for
the distribution of regional housing needs in accordance with Section 65584.3. If the
department determines that a county,supported by resolutions from a maiority of cities within
the county representin-g a maiority of the population, possesses the capability and resources
and has agreed to accept the responsibility, with respect to its iurisdiction, for the
identification and determination of housing market areas and regional housing needs, the
department shall delegate this responsibility to the cities and counties within these areas.
(c) For purposes of subdivision(a) of Section 65583,the regional housing needs shall be
developed in the following manner:
(1) Each council of-governments shall determine the existing and proiected need for housing
within the region based upon proiected population-growth within the region. if the total
regional population forecast for the planning period, developed by the council of governments
and used for the preparation of regional transportation and air quality plans, is within a range
of five percent of the total population growth proiected during the planning period for the
region over the same time period by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast
developed by the council of-governments shall be the basis for developing proiected regional
housing needs. If the difference between the total population-growth proiected by the council
of-governments and the total population growth proiected for the region by the Department of
Finance is-greater than five percent then the Department of Housing and Community
Development and the council of-government representatives shall meet to discuss variances
in methodology used for population.proiection and seek agreement on a population
proiection for the region to be used as a basis for determining a regional housinq needs
proiection for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the regional housinq needs shall
be based upon a population proiection agreed upon between the council of governments and
the department which is within five percent of the population proiection for the region
developed by the Department of Finance.
I
I
1
(2) Based upon the regional population forecasts determined pursuant to Paragraph(1). the
regional housing needs shall be developed by the council of-government Prior to developing
the regional housing needs and Propos►no any draft allocation of regional housing needs
representatives of the council of governments shall meet and consult with the department on
the Proposed assumptions and demographic methodology to be used to determine the
regional housing needs assessment The council of-government shall provide if the
information is available, the growth proiected in each population cohort for age ethnicity,
gender, and any other demographic subdivision of population as identified by the council of
government in consultation with the department The council of-government shall consult
with the department on-the followinq factors-
(i) anticipated household cirowth associated with Population increase
Lii) identified household size and existing trends in household size
NO the rate of household formation or"headship rates "based on age and/or ethnicity, or
other established demographic measures
tiv) the vacancy cafes in existing housing stock and the vacancy rate required to assure
Proper housing market function, as well as housin4 replacement requirements
(v) regional economic trends, natural resource issues conflicting state and federal laws and
policim and other issues which affect development within the region
(3) When developing the proposed regional housing needs the council of governments shall
consider any comments Provided by the department to the council of-governments in
accordance with Paragraph(2). After completing the Proposed regional housing needs the
council of governments shall notify the department Included in the notification,the council of
governments shall describe the assumptions and methodology used to develop the regional
housing needs, along with an explanation of how any comments raised by the department
were addressed. Within 30 days following notice of this determination the department shall
review the Proposed regional housing needs, including the methodology and assumptions
used to develop the determination, and determine whether or not the Proposed regional
housing needs represents a reasonable proiection of anticipated housing needs for the region
by the council of-governments. If the department determines that the regional housing needs
determined by the council of governments is not reasonable then the department may revise
the determination of the council of-governments after making a finding supported by
substantial evidence in the record detailing how the determination of the council of
_governments of regional housing needs fails to represent a reasonable proiection of
anticipated housing needs based upon the established-Population Proiection for the region in
based upon the following factors:
(i) The council of government failed to supply relevant available data supporting its
determination of regional housing need.
Lii) The council of government used inaccurate data supporting its determination ofre-gional
housing need.
ON The council of'government failed to employ reasonable appropriate consistent or
recognized planning methodology or application of methodology supporting its determination
of regional housing need.
(e) Determinations'made by the department a council of governments or a city or county
Pursuant to this Article, including changes to local zoning and other local changes decisions
and Polices necessary to accommodate the allocation of regional housing need numbers and
the identification of adequate sites, pursuant to this Article are-exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act(Division 13(commencing with Section 21000) of the
Public Resources Code).
t) The determinations of the council of-governments and the department Pursuant to this
section shall be sub►ect to iudicial review pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil
Procedure.
1
{ f
r
Regional Survey To Identify Land Available For Housin_g -
Section 65584.1 is added to read.
a)At least two yearn prior to the establishment of the regional housing needs by a council of
-governments pursuant to section 65584, each council of-governments shall survey all of its
member cities and counties on existing land availability and capacity for housing
development based upon the community's general plan. The survey shall include the
following factors:
1) The capacity of the community to accommodate additional housing based on the
availability of land for housing development within the community. Land availability shall
include lands currently zoned for housing, lands available for housing through mixed use
zoning, redevelopment or infill policies, planned annexations, and the existing ratio of
housing to iobs within the community.
2) Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state
programs such as those designed to preserve open space, parks, farmland, environmental
habitats, natural resources, and coastal resources.
3) Lands preserved or protected from urban development under local programs and policies,
including, but not limited to:adopted county general plan policies that encourage growth to
occur within cities, local agency formation commission policies, or city or county policies
designed to open space, parks, farmland, environmental habitats, natural resources, and
coastal resources.
(3) Lands where housing development is not appropriate or densities are restricted due to the
existence of adverse health and safety conditions, -geological or topographical conditions
including, but not limited to, flood plains, wildfire hazards,seismic faults, and land erosion, or
\ the existence of incompatible adjacent land uses.
(4) Severe inadequacies in the capacity of existing local infrastructure.-which are supported
by documentation by the local-government, including inadequate water supplies,sewer
capacities, and transportation infrastructure which limit the capacity of the community to
serve new development
(5) Severe fiscal constraints documented by the local government,such as a loss of a maior
revenue source which will require reductions in services to existing residents and will
significantly limit the local-government capacity to deliver services to new residents.
(b) The survey completed by a local-government pursuant to this section, shall be used as the
basis for the proposed methodology for distribution of regional housing needs pursuant to
paragraph (1) of section 65584.3.
Delegation of RHNA Allocation to Subregions
Section 65584.2 is added to read:
IS THE PROCESS OF FORMING A SUBREGION CLEAR ENOUGH? IS THIS LANGUAGE
ENOUGH?
(a) At least one and one-half years prior to the establishment of the regional housing need
pursuant to section 65584, those representatives of cities and a county, or counties, desiring
to form a subregion shall notify the council of governments of their intent to form a subregion
within the council of-government for the purpose of allocating the subregion's share of the
regional housing need determined in accordance with the allocation methodology established
pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision(a) of Section 65584.3.
i
(b) Followina the determination of repional housing needs pursuant to Section 65584 the
council of governments.shall delegate allocation responsibility to counties or ioint powers
authorities, established pursuant to Chapter 5(commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7
of Title 1,_or by a io►nt powers authority or the-governing body of a subregional entity
des►anated by a councU of-governments The council of governments shall allocate to each
local-government its share of the repional housing need established pursuant to paragraph(1)
of subdivision(a) of Section 65584.3. and shall allocate to the subregion for distribution'
among local governments the units allocated to the subregion in accordance with the
methodology established pursuant to paragraph(2) of subdivision(a) of Section 65584.3.,
Developing the RHNA Allocation Methodolo-qv
Section 65584.3 is added to read.
(a)At least one year prior to the establishment of the regional housing need by a council of
governments pursuant to Section 65584 the council of governments shall develop a proposed
methodology for distnbuting the re-gional housing need to local governments and subregions
where applicable. The proposed methodologv along with any relevant underlying data and
assumptions,shall be distributed to all local-governments The council of-governments shall
solicit,comments from local-governments and the public in public hearings on the proposed
methodology for alperiod of no less than 90 days The proposed methodology shall be based
upon the followinci two factors:
i
(1)An initial allocation which reflects and does not exceed the ability of the local government
to accommodate additional housing development identified by each local government in the
survey of local-governments pursuant to subdivision Section 65584 1
(2)In addition to the proposed allocation pursuant to paragraph(1) the proposed allocation
methodologv shalf also address how any additional re-gional housing needs based upon
pro►ected population growth within the region will be allocated among local jurisdictions or
idenfified subregions should the regional housing needs identified pursuant to section 65584
exceed the available land supplies for housinq within the region identified in accordance with
paragraph(1).Among the factors to be considered by the council of-governments when
Proposing the methodology for distributing regional housing needs not accommodated .
Pursuant to paragraph (1) are:
(i) The share of the regional housing need which the iurisdiction will be allocated in
accordance with paragraph(1) of this Section
I
(ii) The share of repional housing needs allocated to the local jurisdiction in previous planning
periods, and the record of the local jurisdiction of approving proposed housing developments
(ijj) The relationship between concentrations of available employment including proiected
employment, and housing units and the relationship between the salary generated from
employment and available affordable housing units
,
(jv) Maximizing the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure and
furthering repional transportation policies.
i'
(y) The availability of suitable infill opportunities and available housing sites which would
support new development in compact forms in a manner which seeks to avoid the over
concentration of lower income households in cities or counties which already have
disproportionately high proportions of lower income households
r ;
(vi) The type and tenure of housing, including the demand for affordable housing
(vii) The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments
as defined in paragraph(8) of subdivision(a) of Section 65583, that
changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment,subsidy
contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions, and the
housing needs of farmworkers
(viii) Anv other factors adopted by the council of governments
(b) The council of governments shall assign the factors in subdivision(a) a numerical weight
in accordance with the•ydorities of the council of-governments.
I NEED THE COGS TO HELP CRAFT THE MOST APPROPRIATE PLACE TO PROVIDE
INCENTIVES IN THE RHNA PROCESS. THE LANGUAGE IN (C) BELOW IS THE BEST I CAN DO
AT THIS POINT. SOME HAVE SUGGESTED THAT INCENTIVES HERE MAY ENCOURAGE
SOME JURISDICTIONS-TO LOWBALL THEIR SURVEYS TO GET INCENTIVES FOR TAKING
HIGHER NUMBERS LATER. I STILL THINK THAT THIS IS THE PLACE WHERE YOU OFFER
JURISDICTIONS TO STRECH MORE THAN THEY SAID THEY COULD'DO,IN THEIR SURVEY.
PERHAPS IT COULD BE INCENTIVES FOR LOW AND VERY LOW UNITS? FOR NOW, THIS IS
THE BEST I CAN DO. IF SOMEONE HAS A BETTER IDEA, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO WRITE IT.
(c)In-addition to the proposed methodology identified pursuant to subdivision(a), the council
of government shall identify any existing regional or state incentives,such as a priority for
funding, or other incentives to those local-governments which are willing to accept additional_
regional housing need allocations pursuant to paragraph(2) of subdivision(a), which exceed
the community's allocation based upon the identified existing local land availability and
capacity established pursuant to Para-graph(1) of subdivision(a).
(d) Followinq the conclusion of the 90-day public comment period on the proposed allocation
methodology, the council of-governments shall adopt a final regional housing need allocation
methodology within 60 days, based upon a two-thirds vote of the governing body of the
council of government.Any future amendment made to the adopted methodology shall be
subject to a two-thirds vote of the-governinq body of the council of government.
Allocation of RHNA Units and Appeals
Section 65584.4 is added to read:
65584.4(a) Following the establishment of the•regional housing needs pursuant to 65584 the
council of government shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housinq needs to
individual local-governments and subregions, where applicable, in accordance with the
methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.3. and including the underlinq data and
methodology on which the allocation is based. The council of-governments shall include in
the distribution of housinq needs to local governments and subregions a schedule of public
hearings and opportunity for local-governments or a subregion to appeal the draft allocation
in accordance with either or both of the following criteria:
(1) Failure of the allocation to be consistent with the local governments survey on the capacity
of the local government to accommodate additional housinq development completed by the
Local government pursuant Section 65584.1., or a significant and unforeseen chance in
circumstances which merits a revision of the allocation based upon the factors identified in
section 65584.1.
(2) Failure of the council of-governments to allocate housinq need to a local government or
subregion based upon the methodology established by the council of-government pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision(a) of Section 65584.3., or a significant and unforeseen change in
circumstances which merits a revision of the allocation based upon the factors identified in
paragraph(2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65584.3.
(b)Any local government which is not participatinq in a subregional allocation'orocess may
file an appeal based upon paragraph(1) or(2) or both of subdivision(a) to the council of
government within 45 days of receiving the draft allocation from the council of government
The council of government shall hear any appeals within 60 days of the final date when
appeals may be filed with the council of government A committee designated by the council
of-government composed of local elected officials may also conduct the necessary hearings
Following the completion of the 60-day period for hearing appeals the council of government
shall issue a proposed final allocation within 45 days The proposed Final allocation plan shall
include responses,to comments received on the proposed draft allocation and reasons for
significant revisions included in the final allocation
(c) For a local government which is participating in a subregional allocating process the local
_government may file an appeal to the council of government based upon the direct allocation
to the local-government pursuant to paragraph(1) of subdivision(a) in accordance with the
timeline specified in subdivision(b).
(d)Any subregion�mav file an appeal with the council of-government based upon paragraph
(2) of subdivision(a),in accordance with the timeline specified in subdivision(b) which may
also include any appeals Filed by a local government pursuant to subdivision(C) of this
Section.
(e) In the proposed Final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments agreed to by
the council of governments may adjust allocations to subregions and to local governments
based upon the results of the appeals process specified in this section as long as anv
increase in housing need assigned to a subregion or a local-government is distributed
proportionally among all subregions and local governments in a manner which ensures that
the increase in housinq need numbers assigned to an individual local-government or a
subregion does not exceed more than seven percent of the allocation within each income
cate-gory, that was assigned to the subregion or local government in the draft allocation
pursuant to subdivision(a). This subdivision shall not be interpreted to preclude two or more
local govemments'from agreeing to an alternate distribution of appealed housinq allocations
between the affected local 4ovemments.
M Within 60 days of the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to
subdivision(e), each subregional entity established pursuant to section 65584.2.shall provide
the council of government with an allocation of regional housinq needs for each local
_government within the subregion, which is supported by at least two-thirds of the affected
local-governments: The allocations agreed to within the subregions may differ with draff
allocations assigned to individual iurisdictions pursuant to Section 65584.3.or modified based
upon the proposed final allocation pursuant to subdivision(e) to reflect subregional priorities
and local agreements, but in no event shall the total allocation in the subregion equal less
than the total housinq need allocated to the subregion pursuant to paragraph(e) If the
council of aovernment finds that the proposed subregional allocation does not equal the,total
housinq need allocated to the subregion or that the subregion has not submitted an
allocation within 60 days, then the council of-governments shall allocate the housinq needs to
the individual local-governments to ensure that total regional housing need is maintained
(q) Within 45 days of receiving proposed subregional allocations pursuant to subdivision(f)
the council of-government shall adopt a final allocation plan. The council of-governments
shall have final authority to determine whether the final allocation is consistent with Sections
65584. The determination of the council of governments shall be subject to iudicial review
pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
I
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65588
65588.
(a) Each local government shall review its housing element
as frequently as appropriate to evaluate all of the following:
(1) The appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in
contributing to the.attainment of the state housing goal.
y (2) The effectiveness of the housing element in attainment of the
community's housing goals and objectives.
(3) The progress of the city, county, or city and county in implementation
of the housing element.
(b) The housing element shall be revised as appropriate, but not less than
every six five years, to reflect the results of this periodic review.
(c) The review and revision of housing elements required by this section shall
take into account any low- or moderate-income housing provided or
required pursuant to Section 65590.
(d) --The review pursuant to subdivision (c) shall include, but need not be limited
-to, the following:
(1) The number of new housing units approved for construction within the
coastal zone after January 1, 1982.
(2) The number of housing units for persons and families of low or
moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and
Safety Code, required to be provided in new housing developments
either within the coastal zone or within three miles of the coastal zone
pursuant to Section 65590.
(3) The number of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons
and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of
the Health and Safety Code, that have been authorized to be
demolished or converted since January 1, 1982, in the coastal zone.
(4) The number of residential dwelling units for persons and families of low
or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and
Safety Code, that have been required for replacement or authorized to
be converted or demolished as identified in paragraph (3)., The
Iodation of the replacement units, either onsite, elsewhere within the
locality's jurisdiction within the coastal zone, or within three miles of
the coastal zone within the locality's jurisdiction, shall be designated in
the review.
(e) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) or the date of adoption of the housing
elements;previously in existence, the dates of revisions for the housing
element shall be rnediffied as follows:
en:wtr':v:iii ^I:varivi Cry ''. omma.i n �F/�n.,eTcrrmmi'r GYtfbeF 3'1,
for the third, revision and 1■■ne 40 2005 fbr-the fourth
Acton:%•t:on of Qw Area GoyeMmentsi DeGember 31 2001 fer the V V■as�■V■■ �.r-ycry-7 Area ' ' ,
third revio:en and 1■■ne 40 2006 for the fourth re
CounGn! 6f Fresno County
f
the Kern County Counp-01 n
-he SaGramento Area Councal of Governments! june
���vrsrr�-�Irrd ref�Sfvnrnr and vrn$-3A, 2w007, for the fourth
revision.
(4) en�l d■miern wntc wothan the regional jurisdiction
of
the
Assoniatie of Monter v O�..
f^f VV Aree��overnments llener„her '�q 2002,
I4i■V
the third r 3A 2AA7 for�e e■■
zrrc�■TiTcr-�e�SFAF1�a�-�RQ'-d 1 1 revision.
(5) Loco! governments wlithan the regional jurisdiction of the-San
Diego Acc►nnietinn of� n,,�t`s,., December 31 �1999 for the third
� c.�Y9rrv'rrvr-r.s' eF�YJ ���
.yc;le ending
1■■ne 30 �1A00 end 1■■ne 40 7AAA for the
�irTr.� O� v � � ry v-r� �yi-c77�i'
fourth reri:�inn
(6) All Oherlocal i.evernments! Denember �11 2003 for the third
V� dirt-'v ci clTg r v■■■rri�T�T.7 dT� Gwp�
reriscion M■■V VM■7V and 1■■ne 40' 2008' ■■for the forth
■■�
�Ilhssequent re�i:cionc shall he nompleted t 1ess lJ than
t
nterrm
following folloing the fe■■rth re
�vw ■..w■r cr■
I ,
I
not more than one year after receiving a final allocation from the Department.
a Council of-governments or a Subregional Agency pursuant to Section
65584.4
(fl The Southern California Association of Governments and
I
the San Diego Association of Governments shall establish regional housing
needs (;
i
prior to an update of their regional transportation plans in accordance with
Section 65584
at least 180 days before the first update after January 1, 2004 and every other
_update thereafter.
(_-g)All Councilsiof Governments not referenced in subdivision (t), which are in
I
regions required to update their regional transportation plans every three
years
shall establish regional housing needs prior to an update
of their regional transportation plans in accordance with Section 65584 at least
180 days before the second, update after January 1, 2004 and every other
update thereafter.
(h)After January 1, 2003, Councils of Governments which are not
required to update their regional transportation plans every three years shall
establish
regional housing needs not later than June 30, 2008 and every six vears
thereafter.
V) Councils-of Government in which there has not been a delegation of
authority to a
subregional agency pursuant to Section 65564.2 shall complete their
allocation of housing
needs pursuant to Section 65584.4 within one year after the Regional Housing
Needs have
been established pursuant to Section 65584.
fi) Councils of Governments where there has been delegation to one or
moreSubregional
agencies pursant to Section 65584.2, and such subregional agencies shall
complete their final
allocation of housing needs pursuant to Section 65584.4 within.one and one
half years
after the Regional Housing Needs have been established pursuant to Section
65584.
ATTACHMENT 4
(Darren Kettle Report to be sent under separate cover)