The URL can be used to link to this page

04/11/2002 F,ILE COPY _ o►T Y GRAND 0ERR CE April 11, 2002" 22795 Barton'Road- .Grand Terrace California 92313-5295, ; Civic Center, (909)824-6621, Fax(909)783=7629 Fax(909)783-2600 CITY -OF GRAND -TERRACE Dan•Btichanan •Mayor CRA%CITY COUNCIL - LeeAnn Garcia Mayor ProTem' - - REGULAR MEETINGS tlerman-Hilkey` Dontarldn : 2ND.AND 4TH' Thursdays 6:00 -p.m.' Maryetta Ferre " Council Memkers Thomas J.Schwab , City Manager Council.Chambers - 6:A� Grand Terrace. Civic Center ; 22795 Barton,Road ' = Grand-Terrace, CA 92313-5295 . CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCEL CHAMBERS APRIL 11, 2002 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 P.M. 22795 Barton Road THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990.IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT(909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING, OTHER THAN UNDER PUBLIC COMMENT, YOU ARE ASKED TO PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED UPON BY THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. * Call to Order- * Invocation- * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 03-28-2002 Minutes Approve 2. Check Register CR0207 Approve 3. Resolution - Authorizing Submittal of an Application for Approve Funding under the Cal Home Program ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS-None 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and _ noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council'Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for j discussion. { i A. Approval of Check Register CO207 Approve B. Ratify 04-11-2002 CRA Action C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D. Approval of 03-28-2002 Minutes Approve E. Council/City Manager Travel to League of California Cities ' Authorize Legislative Days May 15 & 16 2002 COUNCIL AGENDA 04-11-2002 PAGE 2 OF 2 I I. AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION 4. PUBLIC COMMENT 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of March 4,2002 Accept b. Appoint Alternate Member(Monroe) Appoint B. Council Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS I A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Approve Terrace,California,Amending Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Chapter 10.08, Establishing Speed Limits for Various Streets in the City of Grand Terrace 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Second Reading of An Ordinance of the City of Grand Approve Terrace,California,Amending the Grand Terrace Zoning Code by Adding Certain Definitions to Chapter 18.06 Relative to Second Family Unit and Single Family Detached Residential; By Amending Chapter 18.69 Regarding the Provisions for Second Family Units to Comply with State Law; and by Modifying Table 18.10.030 to Allow for a Second,Full Sized Single Family Unit in the City's Multifamily Residential!Zones. 8. NEW BUSINESS f A. Final Approval of Parcel Map No. 15780 Approve B. Legislative Update C. Resolution Establishing a Voluntary Contribution Check- Approve off Program - D. Reschedule Budget Meeting Reschedule 9. CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN I THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,APRIL 25,2002. .................... . .. .... ..............................................:............................... AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 04-25-2002 MEETING _ MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE,CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 04-18-2002. PEND!NO C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 28, 2002 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on March 28, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Lee Ann Garcia, Vice-Chairwoman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Don Larkin, Agency Member Maryetta Ferre, Agency Member Tom Schwab,Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Jerry Glander,Building&Safety Director Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriffs Department ABSENT: Dan Buchanan, Chairman John Harper, City Attorney APPROVAL OF 03-14-2002 MINUTES CRA-2002-18 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER FERRE, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 3-0-2-0(AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN AND CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve the March 14, 2002 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes. CHECK REGISTER CR0206 CRA-2002-19 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HE.KEY,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN AND CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve check register CR0206. t RICHARD ROLL INS PARK/TERRACE HILLS MIDDLE 'SCHOOL RENOVATION PROJECT DESIGN CONTRACT CRA-2002-20 MOTION BY AGENCY-MEMBER HILKEY,SECON-D BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN WAS ABSENT), to Authorize staff to prepare an agreement for professional ,design services with Community Works Design Group for execution by the Mayor. CRA AGENDA rrEm NO. i I I it Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes March 28, 2002 Page 2 i Vice-Chairwoman Garcia adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency;Meeting at 6:10 p.m. until the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, April 11,2002 at 6:00 p.m. I SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRNUN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace i i I I I I I I 1, i I � �i I I, i I i i � CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING C�iA APPROVAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY r _ DATE: APRIL 11, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0207 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 11, 2002 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ENF. TRAINING & LAPTOP BATTERY 111. 87 13934 ARROWHEAD_CREDIT UNION VISA 11.58 46816 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE EXPENSES 40.00 46824 =DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM LAWN SERVICE 22293 BARTON RD 86 .00 3 46834 JEFF GOLLIHAR SERVICES 3/19 THRU 4/1/02 46835 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC. FEBRUARY, 2002 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40.50 46845 PROTECTION ONE 4TH QTR ALARM MONITORING 74.53 46856 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY BOTTLED WATER-HONG USING SING 45.69 46865 YOSEMITE WATER TOTAL J 1 717.42 I CERTIFY THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITIED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY. aZ m LARRY RONNOW Z FINANCE DIRECTOR v a z - 0 - 1 �G�pMMU�yj�� Q ,p DATE: March 21, 2002 itfiKD 1E t,-se'�,. -rtic •t<,•^.�i ,,.,�- sr- ren r. �''r., - ..n�s'•,�'`r.- Axil 11 , 2002 �4UGH gOvs CRA (X) COUNCIL.ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: " _e 20 DEPARTMENT OF SUBJECT: Grant Proposal for Cal Home Mobile Home replacement grant BUILDING & SAFETY, PUBLIC WORKS A FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X �j N HOUSING 22795 Barton Road Suite B The Community Redevelopment Agency for the City of Grand Terrace has been approved Grand Terrace b Council to proceed with the CalHome Grant program. This was done without a California 92313-5295 y Civic Center Resolution by Council. The Sundance Company, which is writing the Grant for the (909) 825-3825 Community Redevelopment Agency, is requesting a Resolution at this time. Fax (909) 825-7506 Staff is proposing that Council approves a Resolution. r CRA AGENDA STEM NO. .� i i ff I i RESOLUTION NO. CRA-2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1OF THE j CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN 4 APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF � HOUSING AND- COMMUNITY j DEVELOPMENT (HCD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE, CALHOME, PROGRAM (THE "PROGRAM") AND THE EXECUTION 'OF THE STANDARD AGREEMENT, ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO,AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS -REQUIRED BY HCD F,OR PARTICIPATION UNDER THE PROGRAM i WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City,of Grand Tdrrace (the"Agency")is a public body corporate and politic, organized and existing pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and 'Safety Code Section 33000, et.seq.); and WHEREAS, the Agency is authorized to carry out housing progirams and projects within the City of Grand ;Terrace, and in the interest of preserving the affordable mobile home housing stock within the City of Grand Terrace, the Agency wishes to apply for and receive an allocation of funds in the total amount of $500,000 through the State of California Departmentof;Housing and Community Development(HCD)CalHome Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITS RESOLVED, by the Community Redeve opment Agency of the,City of Grand Terrace as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby authorizes the submittal to HCD an application to participate in the CaIHo a Program in response to the Notice of -Funding Availability (NOFA) issued on or about August i2001, which will request a funding allocation for the following activities: Activity - Rehabilitation/Replacement of substandard manu actured housing/mobile home units Amount - $$500,000 Activity Location City of Grand Terrace, California Section 2. The Agency hereby agrees that should the application for funding be approved by HCD, the; Agency hereby agrees to use the CalHome funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in the application, as approved by HCD, and in accordance with the CalHome Prog1ram Guidelines and/or Program Regulations. i Section 3. The Community Redevelopment Agency hereby authorizes the Executive Director of the Agency to execute in the name of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, all documents required by HCD for application in the CalHome Program. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 111 day of April, 2002. Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace ATTEST: Secretary of the--Community Redevelopment Agency of the City Cleric of the City of Grand Terrace tom' 2 PEP°ztNG CITY u c ' COUW,. ,�PtPP rROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: APRIL 11,.2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO207 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF:' APRIL 11, 2002 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13929 COMP USA COMPUTER LOAN-THIERRY 1,610.78 . 13930 DENNICE PRECIE BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00 13931 LARRY RONNOW BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00 13932 VERA MAURICIO BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00 11 13933 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS FOR PAYROLL ENDED 3/15/02 ' 4, . 1,511511.96 13934 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VISA FURNITURE, CONF. EXPENSES, MISC. 50.00 13935 KATRINA GRANILLO BIRTHDAY BONUS 5000 13936 CATALINA VARELA BIRTHDAY BONUS 44. 13937 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA MARCH CELL SERVICE-CHILD CARE 67. 98 .71 13938 PACIFIC BELL PHONE SERVICE-CITY FACILITIES 2600 13939 MARIA LETICIA LEIJA REFUND CHILD CARE FEES - 261.58 46810 AARON'S SIGNS & BANNERS COMMUNITY PRIDE SIGNS/BANNERS 61. 46811 ACCENT PRINT&.DESIGN PRINTING-1000 BUILDING PERMITS 946.91 46812 MATTHEW ADDINGTON MARCH COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 n 46813 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 4TH QTR CHILD CARE MONITORING 468.00 O LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 16.75 Z ,46814- AT &T 3,460.12 n 46815 BARHAM CONSULTING SERVICES CONSULTING SERVICES 1/31 THRU 3/14/02 0. 46816 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 46 r 46817 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1-215 SIGNAL ENERGY/MAINTENANCE 82.08 a 46818 CALBO CALBO CLASS I MEMBERSHIP-GLANDER 215.00 n1 46819 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. PLANTRONICS HEADSET A100, 54.20 Z 46820 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES 159.75 a 46821 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC. TOT LOT ROLLINS PK-BUY/INSTALL EQUIPMENT 2 1, 2. 46822' DELL MARKETING L.P. COMPUTER & COLOR INKJET PRINTER-EOC ,492.32 56 46823 DICKSON COMPANY FEBRUARY STREET SWEEPING 2,312.50 46825 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY MAINTENANCE..SUPPLIES, TOOLS 205.13 Z 46826- G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MARCH CHAMBER LUNCH/APRIL NEWSLETTER 627.75 6�_O 1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: APRIL 11, 2002 CHECK REGISTER NO: CO207 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 11, 2002 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 46827 GARY L. KOONTZ CONSULTING SERVICES 2,150.00 46828 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC. IT EQUIPMENT/REPAIR SERVICES 4,647.87 -46829 HOME DEPOT_ ___ REPAIR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 250.01 46830 HOURGLASS & MIRROR REPLACE 4 WINDOWS-CHILD-CARE- -;-------------- - 46831 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 130:20 46832 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP. BREAD,PRODUCTS-CHILDCARE 34.49 46833 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC. APRIL EDEN SERVER PAYMENT 291.32 _ __46836__LEGEND BUILDING MAINTENANCE FEBRUARY LIBRARY CLEANING SERVICES 250.00 46837 MALTONCONSTRUCTION CURB/GUTTERREPAIR=DEBERRY---_ -_ -- 5;770-.00 - - -- 46838 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHONE USAGE-CITY FACILITIES 931.31 46839 MICHELLE BOUSTEDT LOCAL MILEAGE 43.80 46840. ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY HEART BALLOONS-CHILD CARE 34.55 -46841 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY APRIL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 248.96 46842 PACIFIC BELL PHONE CHARGES-CITY FACILITIES 181.41 46843 PARKER VISION REPLACE POWER SUPPLY-CHAMBER CAMERA 53.07 46844 PATTON SALES CORPORATION COLD CHOP SAW 10.58 46845 PROTECTION ONE 4TH QUARTER ALARM MONITORING 115.50 46846 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 4WD TRACTOR LOADER RENTAL 237.29 46847 RHINOTEK COMPUTER PRODUCTS HP 4 LASER CARTRIDGE 68.68 46848 ROADRUNNER STORAGE APRIL STORAGE FEE 63.00 46849 RWP FIBER FALL 25 YARDS FIBER FALL. 856.61 -46850 S.B.-COUNTY AUDI-T-OR/CONT-ROLLER- RELEASE LIEN 277=263-30-0000 12.00 46851 S.B. COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAP SUBSCRIPTION 65.00 46852 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF FEBRUARY LAW ENF. CONTRACT SERVICES 87,578.00 46853 S.B. COUNTY VEHICLE SERVICES ROAD REPAIR SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT 73.40 _ _4-6854SAN BERNARDINO ASSOC. GOVERNMENTS FY01/02 GENERAL ASSMNT MEMBER DUES 397.67 46855 SBC DATA COMM CON-SNTP-P1 FOR PIX 506 816.25 46856 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY-CITY FACILITIES 5,037.92 - - -- -- 2 C. 01, CITY OF GRAND TERRACE - ---- - -- - --- ----- ----- --- --- CO20 7 -- - CHECK REGISTER NO: DATE: APRIL 11, 2002 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 11, 2002 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHECK NO. VENDOR 1,193.35 46857 SYSCO FOOD SUPPLIES-CHILD DARE MARCH COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 46858 MARY TRAINOR 46859 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-& PLANNING SPEED ZONE SURVEY & FEB. PROF. SERVICES 4,860.50 CA CODE UPDATES 109.91 46860 WEST GROUP 50.00 BRIAN 46861 WHITLEY MARCH COMMISSION STIPEND N ENGINEERING & PLAN CHECK FEES 2,677.31 46862 RIAN 46862 ILLD WILSON MARCH COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 46864 XEROX CORPORATION COPIER MAINTENANCE AND LEASE OUG 530.01 46865 YOSEMITE WATER BOTTLED WATER-CITY FACILITIES 180.75 =�-y SUBTOTAL $165,227.32 MARCH PAYROLL " 138,852.50 GRAND TOTAL $304,079.82 I CERTIFY THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. LARRY RONNOW FINANCE DIRECTOR 3 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE \.-I- _•. i COUNCIL AFi-nOL`;=L CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 28, 2002 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 28, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT. Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Don Larkin, Councilmember Maryetta Ferre, Councilmember Tom Sch%t-ab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Jerry Glander, Building & Safety Director Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department ABSENT. Dan Buchanan, Mayor John Harper, City Attorney The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Herman Hilkey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilwoman Maryetta Ferre. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Month - April 2002' Councilmember Hilkey read a proclamation proclaiming April 2002 as Child Abuse Prevention Month in the City of Grand Terrace encouraging citizens to join in the efforts to end child abuse. > 2B. Proclamation-National Community Development Week - April 1-7, 2002 Councilmember Ferre read a proclamation proclaiming April 1 - April 7, 2002 as National Community Development Week in the City of Grand Terrace urging all citizens to join in recognizing the Community Development Program and the importance it serves to the community. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2002-22 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N0.13D l i Council 'Minutes March 28, 2002 Page 2 FERRE, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve the following consent calendar items: 3A. Approval of Check Register CO206 3B. Ratify 03-28-2002 CRA Action 3C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3D. Approval of 03-14-2002 Minutes 3 E. Resolution Filing an Application with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for Land and Water Conservation Funds 3F. Resolution Filing an Application with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for Per Capita Grant Program Funds 3G. Resolution Filing an Application with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for Roberti-Z'Berg-Hams Open Space Program Local Assistance Funds 3H. Economic Development Update PUBLIC COMMENT - None ORAL REPORTS i 5A. Committee�Reports 1. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of February 4, 2002 1 CC-2002-23 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to accept the February 4, 2002 minutes of the Emergency Operations Committee. 2. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of March 4, 2002 j CC-2002-24 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to accept the March 4, 2602 minute of the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Larkin, reported that the Riverside Highland Water Company held their annual Board Meeting and indicated that they are in good standing which has a lot to do with Council Minutes March 28,2002 Page 3 good management and making good investments. He congratulated the directors that were re-elected to their positions. Gene McMeans was recognized at their meeting for the many years of dedicated service to the community and water company. He expressed his appreciation for all of the dedication that Gene McMeans had for the community and the water company. He reminded everyone that the Miss Grand Terrace Pageant will be held on April 27,.2002. He wished everyone a Happy Easter. r- L Councilmember Ferre, gave a report on the Oversight Committee's decisions for the disbursement of the Bond Money for the Colton Joint Unified School District and indicated that they will meet again in three months. Mayor Pro Tem Garcia, reminded everyone that there is ari opening on the-Planning Commission and that anyone interested should pick up an application from the City Clerk's Department. PUBLIC HEARING 6A. An Ordinance of the city of Grand Terrace,California,Amending the Grand Terrace Zoning Code by Adding Certain Definitions to Chapter 18.06 Relative to Second Family Unit and Single Family Detached Residential; By Amending Chapter 18.69 Regarding the Pro,%isions for Second Family Units to comply with State Law;and by ' Modifying Table 18.10.030 to Allow for a Second,Full Sized Single Family Unit in the City Multifamily Residential Zones. Associate Planner Lampe, gave a brief overview of his report and the proposed ordinance and recommended that the Council approve staffs recommendation. Mayor Pro Tem Garcia opened discussion to the public. Corrine Robinson, 22145 De Berry Street, strongly recommended that the Council approve the proposed Ordinance. She requested that there be a key included with the tables in order to know what the letters stand for. She questioned the definition of the R3 Zone and the number of structures that would be allowed. Associate Planner Lampe, responded that he could provide a key to the table. He indicated that the Planning Commission feels that if you are making a commitment to develop a property for single family residential purposes so therefore if a commitment is going to be made to develop the property for single family uses they should be more or less restricted to single family detached type uses and no more than two such dwellings. He indicated that if someone owns an R2 lot and they want to build a tri-plex on it they should be allowed as long as it meets the density standards. This would be true for the R3 Zone as well. j I Council Minutes March 28,2002 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tern Garcia returned discussion to the Council. I CC-2002-25 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, CARRIED 1-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT),to approve the first reading of an Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace, California, Amending the Grand Terrace Zoning (Code by Adding Certain Definitions to Chapter 18.06 Relative to Second Family Unit and Single Family Detached Residential; By Amending Chapter 118.69 Regarding the 1 Provisions for Second Family Units to comply with State Law; and by Modifying Table 18.10.030 to Allow for a Second, Full Sized Single Family Unit in the City Multifamily Residential Zones and approve the Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the Ordinance will have a significant adverse impacts on the environment. i UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A. Northwest Corner Parking at Mt. Vernon/Grand Terrace Road CC-2002-26 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 2-1-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER FERRE' VOTED NO AND COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSIENT),to direct staff to remove the No Parking Requirement from the Northwest Corner at Mt. 1 Vernon/Grand Terrace Road. NEW BUSINESS F 8A. Franchise Amendment: Waste Management Services CC-2002-27 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 3 0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY AND MAYOR BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve an amendment to the 1 ranchise Agreement between the City of Grand Terrace and USA Waste of California,Inc. for the Provision of Integrated Waste Management leaving the curbside bulky item pick- j up twice a year and the twice a year clean-up location at the Senior Center as it was in the original Franchise Agreement. CLOSED SESSION 9A. City Manager Annual Performance Evaluation Mayor Pro Tern Garcia announced that the Council met in Closed Session to discuss the City Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and that there was no reportable action taken. j ' I II , i i it i � I Council Minutes March 28,2002 Page S ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Garcia adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:47 p.m., until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, April 11, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace hIAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace l r Apvco Y STAFF REPORT RAND TER CCity Manager's Office CRA ITEM COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: April 11, 2002 SUBJECT: COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER ATTENDANCE AT THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEGISLATIVE DAYS MAY 15 & 16, 2002 FUNDING REQUIRED ( ) NO FUNDING REQUIRED ( X ) The League of California Cities Legislative Action Days are scheduled for May 15 & 16; 2002 in Sacramento. Staff is requesting authorization for attendance for the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members, and City Manager, to attend. Funding for the expense is in the budget. STAFF RECOMMENDS: COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEGISLATIVE ACTION DAYS IN SACRAMENTO, MAY 15-16, 2002. ' � J COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.�3E: 5 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1 OF GRAND TERR,'.;,. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTE�;; Regular Meeting A P R 0 3 2002 MINUTES March 4, 2002 CITY CLERK The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met for the Regular Meeting in the Emergency Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3 at Civic Center. The meeting-was called to orderat 7:03 p.m. by Chairperson, Sonia Aiken. r MEMBERS PRESENT were Sonia Aiken, Vic Pfennighausen, Robert'Souter, Gary Eldridge, Richard Haubert and JoAnn.Johnson. MEMBERS ABSENT- Richard Haubert. CITY STAFF - Liaison, Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager. GUESTS PRESENT -Prospective members James Monroe and Dragos Barbu. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 4, 2002 was given with no corrections. LIAISON REPORT- a. Planting along Barton Road is done or nearly done. b. Will do tunnelling and bring up pipes for watering. Will be powered by solar power. c. Water meters will be included in the construction of bike lanes. d. Tot lot at Rollins park(for 2-5 year olds) is nearly completed. e. CDBG funds approved for curb,-gutter and sidewalk at Senior Center(Petta Park). f. Resurfacing has been done'on Barton at west end of city. Will sustain for a year or two. g. Steve must attend a 7:30 meeting tonight with the Cultural Heritage Committee. h. Mulching is finished on the slope.on Oriole. i. Grand Terrace Days Parade and Festival will be June 1 st. Theme will be in red, white and blue. j. Trash and street sweeping rates have been reduced allowing for two days sweeping beginning in July. This must be approved by council. k. New computer for Dragos will be here shortly. EOC SET-UP TRAINING -None. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT a. The trailer we have was purchased through a grant and the Sheriffs dept. does not have another. - b. Vic agrees that the Fire Department may use the trailer, but nQt the generator. c. They can use another generator or drop from fire house. d. Vic wants trailer returned and put behind the EOC building. Not way,out back. e. Trailer can be used for Grand Terrace Days. f. Vendors at Grand Terrace Days are paying $100 this year. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N0.15,A I C� I i ' I g. All other equipment is doing well. h. Budget has been submitted and is pretty much as last year, except for the computer j OLD BUSINESS a. It was recommended that Dragos Barbu be accepted as a member. b. It was recommended that James Monroe be accepted on a six month trial basis aslan alternate. If at the end of six months he does not want to continue, he may drop!out. j II 1 NEW BUSINESS I n on Grand Terrace Days. Want trailer there. a. More discussion h � b. We have several flyers, etc. and will try to get some venders for food]water, etc. c. May have information on setting'up a "trash can emergency supply" disguised as table. d. Idea for food ration contained in a milk carton. 1 e. Could possibly give away the oil containers`. f Who can help? Vic, Sonia, Jim,, ;Crary, JoAnn and possibly Dragos and Bob. MEMBERS REPORTS AND COMMENTS I � a. Question of our having I.D. badges City has said No. b. Are all volunteers;covered by insurance? Maybe, but questionable for all c. Discussion on web page and EOC logo as well as E-mail address. ADJOURNMENT at 8:03 ;p.m. Respectfully submitted, i JoAnn J hnson, Secretary i ETING WILL BE APRIL 1, 2002AT 7 'p.m. NEXT ME i i COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE April 11,2002 DATES April 2, 2002 PROBLEM: (1) Emergency Operations Committee is in need of an alternate member. (2) James Monroe has applied for the position. (3) There is some question about his being a regular participating member because of past experience on other committees. ALTERNATIVES- Do nothing. SOL•UTION(S): (1) The City Council.to appoint James Monroe to a six month trial period as an alternate member. (2) To allow, at the end of six months, for Mr. Monroe to resign if this be his choice. (3) To allow the committee, at the end of six months, to drop Mr. Monroe if his attendance has been poor. PROPOSED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCU AND/OR STAFF• (1) Request the Council to accept Mr. Monroe under the conditions stated above. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.� r1 �GCpi MUNl�� _ - t'T r DATE: March 20,2002 W.O.# 12.570 ... _ ..r9-' �i h-' i •l. I+-'.L �Tr '� r:�t' "✓v''e£: ...y..:�'i'C':•:r [''. _ � .:.' `-'r 2£T'• '.• _ = &�___ -•- 4 rat '�.;F•,...t}°: yF; �n J� -�. .Z l,a:?ii M1:any { Y 'K'�•• flYL_.Y {rl. �O .- 'S:•�;- �.� �;r�5�;'�••.-:" :e t .-',5.� ��'".�.-,.`v.: `:! '�+.:j.�',;.•L f�'ny'�e!'i..A.�. UGH DEPARTMENT OF CRA( ) COUNCIL.ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: April 11,2002 BUILDING & SAFETY, PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: Speed Zone Survey AND HOUSING FUNDING REQUIRED— NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX 22795 Barton Road Suite B Grand Terrace At the regular meeting of October 25, 1990 the City Council adopted an ordinance for traffic California 92313-5295 speed zones within the City of Grand Terrace. Civic Center (909) 825-3825 As required by California State Statutes,each agency must perform a traffic study at least every Fax (909) 825-7506 five years in order to be able to enforce the speed limits through the use of radar.That ordinance is in Chapter 10 Section 10.08 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Craig S.Neustaedter,Registered Traffic Engineer,conducted a speed zone study and based on that study, speed limits are hereby recommended for the major thoroughfares within the City. All other streets not specifically identified within the report should be considered residential streets with prima facie speed limits of 25 miles per hour. The following is a summary of the sixteen sections of roadway located in the City of Grand Terrace considered for speed zone re-certification. Sections underlined indicate a recommended change to the currently posted speed limit. Speed Zone Section Posted Recommended Barton Rd. from Michigan St. to Mt. Vernon Ave. 40 40 Barton Rd. from Mt. Vernon Ave. to Preston St. 40 45 Barton Rd. from Preston St. to East City Limits 45 45 De Berry St from Michigan St. to Mt. Vernon Ave. 35 35 De Berry St. from Mt. Vernon Ave. to 1/s mile e/o Observation Dr. 25 35 Michigan St. from Barton Rd. to Van Buren Ave. 35 35 Michigan St. from Van Buren Ave. to Main St. 35 35 Mt. Vernon Ave. from North City Limits to Barton Rd. 40 40 Mt. Vernon Ave. from Barton Rd. to Van Buren Ave. 40 35 Mt. Vernon Ave. from Van Buren to Main St. 40 35 Palm Ave. from Barton Rd. to Honey Hill Dr. 35 35 Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL. AGENDA MM NO� �.lJ� In addition, in 2001 the County of Riverside established a speed zone of 40 mph fdr the south side of Main Street from Iowa Avenue to Mt. Vernon Avenue based on an engineering and traffic survey. This is consistent with the current posted speed limit on the north side of Main Street that is in Grand Terrace jurisdiction. For the purpose of consistency, I recommend that the Riverside County engineering and traffic survey is used as a basis for certifying the Main Street speed zones in Grand;Terrace. I Speed Zone Section Posted Recommended Main St. from Iowa Ave. to'Michigan St. 40 40 Main St. from Michigan St.4o Mt. Vernon Ave. 40 40 Please note at the previous certification in 1996, these were identified as two separate speed zones. I am recommending that these be consolidated into a single zone on Main Street from Michigan Street to Mt. Vernon Avenue in the 2002 certification. This is consistent with the limits specified in the Riverside County engineering and traffic survey. j i The following segments qualify for a prima facie speed limit of twenty-five (25) mph under Section 22352 of the CVC. j Posted Dos Rios Avenue from Palm Avenue to De Berry Street Main Street from Mt. Vernon Avenue to 1/4 mile e/o Oriole Avenue 251 Van Buren Avenue,from Michigan Street to Mt. Vernon Avenue STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT : j 1. City Council conduct a public hearing. 2. Adopt the first reading of the ordinance for speed zoning as recommended''in this report. I I I i I ' I I ' I I i i I I I Page 2 of 2 j I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 10.08, ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS FOR VARIOUS STREETS IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS,the City of Grand Terrace,through its Traffic Consultant,has conducted speed- zone surveys on various City streets; and WHEREAS, the City staff has evaluated traffic conditions and street hazards in each area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY,COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDA I AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 10.08.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: _ "10 08 010 Barton Road Mt Vernon Avenue DeBerry Street, Palm Avenue, Main Street, Michigan Street Dos Rios Avenue and Van Buren Avenue - Findings. The City Council finds, pursuant to traffic and engineering studies conducted during 2002,that speed limits on Barton Road, Mt. Vernon Avenue, DeBerry Street, Palm Avenue, Main Street and Michigan Street are hereby established to provide for the protection of the general public and to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic in a reasonable and safe manner."' Section 2. Section 10.08.020 is hereby amended to read as follows: 10 08 020 Barton Road DeBem Street Palm Avenue Main Street, M.ichiP,an Street, Mt. Vemon Avenue Dos Rios Avenue and Van Buren Avenue - Limits Designated. The Prima Facie speed limits shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of those streets designated as folllows when signs are erected given notice thereof- A. Barton Road from Michigan Street to Mt. Vernon-Avenue, 40 Miles Per Hour; B. Barton Road from Mt. Vernon Avenue to Preston Street, 45 Miles Per Hour; C. Barton Road from Preston Street to East City Limits, 45 Miles Per Hour; D. DeBerry Street from Michigan Street to tilt. Vernon Avenue, 35 ':Miles Per Hour; E. DeBerry Street from Mt. Vernon Avenue to 1/4 mile east of Observation Drive, 35 Miles Per Hour; F. Palm Avenue from Honey Hill Drive to Barton Road, 35 Miles Per Hour; G. Main Street from Michigan Street to Mt. Vernon avenue, 40 Miles Per Hour; H. Main Street from Mt. Vernon to 1/4 mile east of Oriole avenue, 25 Miles Per Hour; I. Michigan Street from Barton Road to Van Buren avenue, 35 Miles Per Hour; - -1- I J. Michigan Street from Van Buren Avenue to Main Street, 35 Miles Per Hour; K. Mt. Vernon Avenue from North City Limits to Barton Road, 40 Miles Per Hour; L. Mt. Vernon Avenue from;Barton Road to Van Buren Avenue; 35 Miles Per Hour, M. Mt. Vernon Avenue from,Van Buren Avenue to Main Street, 3'15 Miles Perl Hour, N. Dos Rios Avenue from Palm Avenue to DeBerry Street, 25 Miles Per Hour; treet to Mt. Vernon Avenue, 25 Miles Per O. Van Buren Avenue from Michigan S Hour." Section 3. Posting. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three(3)public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purposes;by the City Council. Section 4. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 11'day of April, 2002 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting ofisaid City Council on the 25 h day of April, 2002. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Attest: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk 1, Brenda Stanfill,City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace,California;do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the `h'day of April, 2002, by the following vote: City of Grand Terrace held on the 25 i AYES: i NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda;Stanfill, City Clerk ?,ppro-v ed as to form: I I John Harper, City Attorney -2- I - r� . FRANC rf eE Community Development Department STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM( COUNCIL ITEM(X) NIEETING DATE: April 11,2002 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SUBJECT: Second Reading of the Ordinance amending the Zoning Code(Title IS of the Municipal Code) of the City of Grand Terrace to Revise the Second Family Unit Provisions and to Allow a Second, Full-sized, Single Family Residence in the Multifamily zones (Z-01-01 and E-01- 07) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Second Reading of the Ordinance to Revise,the Second Family Unit Provisions and to Allow- a Second, Full-sized, Single Family Residence to the Multifamily Zones. Background: The proposed Ordinance was heard by the City Council on March 28, 2002; and the first reading was approved by the Council on the same date. At that meeting, staff was instructed to modify the proposed Ordinance to add definitions of the meaning"P"and"C"to Table 18.10.030. "P" stands for a"permitted use"; "C" means a "conditional use." This minor change was made to the Ordinance Table 18.10.030 "Footnotes"by the addition of footnote(c.). Recommendation: The staff recommends that the.City Council adopt the second reading of the Ordinance to revise the Second Family Unit provisions of the Zoning Code;and to allow a second.full-sized,single family residence in the multi-family zone. yRKespecAInter d, Director of Planning JL:jI Attachment: Attachment 1: Proposed Ordinance Attachment 2: Negative Declaration and Initial Study c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Secondunits\zOlolco.uncil.rpt2nd 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 9'b6621ambiOabu2E2NA kh EM N017� t I i I I i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE!OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GRAND TERRACE ZONING CODE BY ADDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS TO CHAPTER 18.06 RELATIVE TO SECOND FAMILY UNIT AND SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDEJNTIAL; BY AMENDING CHAPTER 18.69 REGARDING THE PROVISIONS FOR SECOND FAMILY UNITS TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW; AND BY MODIFYING TABLE 18.10.30 TO ALLOW FOR A SECOND,FULL SIZED SINGLE FAMILY UNIT IN THE CITY'S MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAi ZONES ! I t � I i WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared by the Community and Economic i Development Department and duly posted for public review and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission onDecember 20, 2001 at a publicly noticed meeting; and WHEREAS,the City's Housing,!Element which was adopted by separate ordinance on May 27, 1999 contains the statement that it is�the City's intent to revise the existing Second Family Unit provisions in the Zoning Code to conform to State law;this statement is also included in the Updated Housing Element approved by the Council on February 28, 2002; and WHEREAS, the standards, regulations and provisions of the revised Second Family Unit Ordinance bring about conformance of said ordinance with State law; and WHEREAS,the revised Second Family Unit ordinance, in part, provides for an xpedited review of said units which will further the goals of the General Plan Housing Element to promote and encourage housing opportunities for the residents o,f the City of Grand Terrace. j WHEREAS,the modifications to the Zoning Code to allow additional full sized second units I to the City's multifamily residential zones on parcels of sufficient size with the proper re iew will also further the City's Housing Goals of providing and encouraging housing opportunities for the residents of the City of Grand Terrace. WHEREAS,the following findings have been set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the General Plan in that an updating of the City's Second Unit Ordinance and the kallowing of additional single family detached residences in the R2 and R3 Zoning Districts will further-the City's Goals to add needed'housing to the City's housing stock and would provide Code flexibility for the property owner. 2. This proposed amendment to the Grand Terrace Zoning Code is consistent with all other ATTACHM ENT applicable requirements of local ordinances and State law in that the proposed amended provisions for second family units and the allowing of additional single family detached residences in the City's multi-family zones will not conflict with any existing provision of the Zoning Code and will be in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 3.The proposed amendments to the Zoning Code will not be detrimental to the health,safety, morals,comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working within the City of Grand Terrace or be injurious to property or improvements within the City of Grand Terrace. The proposed ordinance will contain provisions to insure that all potential adverse impacts must be fully mitigated following review by appropriate public agencies. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 18.06.82 is hereby added to Chapter 18.06, Definition, as follows: Section 18.06.82 Second Family Units: "Second familv units" means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons It shall include permanent provisions for living sleeping, eating, cookinia, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single family dwelling is situated In no instance shall a second family unit be smaller in size than an area to provide for an "efficiency unit" as defined by the Uniform Building Code nor larger than 1200 square feet. Section 2. Section 18.06.83 is hereby added to Chapter 18.06, Definitions, as follows: Section 18.06.83 Single Family Detached: A single family detached dwelling is defined as one residential_ structure containing no more than one dwelling and complying with a minimum living area requirement of 1,350 square feet It shall also be known as a full sized single family unit or single family dwelling. Section 3. Chapter 18.69, relative to Second Family Units, is modified as follows: CHAPTER 18.69 SECOND FAMILY L�1ITS Sections: 1 18.69.010 Purpose 18.69.020 Definition II � 18.69.030 Permitted Location 18.69.040 Site Development Standards 18.69.050 Special regulations { I 18.69.060 Off Street Parking 18.69.070 Approval Criteria 18.69.080 Administrative and Non-Administrative Conditional Use Permits I Section 18.69.010 Purpose: The purpose of this chapter is to 'establish regulations for the placement of second family units and to ensure the placement of such a unit is compatible with the surrol unding neighborhood and single family units. Section 18.69.020 Definition: "Second family units" means an attached or detached residential d«-elling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shah include i permanent provisions for living,sleeping,eating,cooking,and sanitation on the same parcel as the single family dwelling is situated. I I Section 18.69.030 ' Permitted Location: Second family units area permitted tzse-in any-Ri-District single-family or multifamily residential zone district subject to the approval of-a an administrative c6nditional use permit as set forth in Chester 18.84 of the Zoning Code if the proposed second famil'y unit is attached to the main residence and to the approval of a conditional use permit rel uinng a public hearing as set forth in Chester 1883 of the Zoning Code if the proposed second family unit is detached from the'main residence. I ' I Section 18.69.040 Site Development Standards: 1 Site development standards for second family units shall be the same as those required in Chapter 18.10 for the appropriate R1 District except where the special regulations listed in Section 18.69.050.are in conflict with those in Chapter 18.10. In such cases the Istandards listed in Section 18.69.050 shall apply. I Section 18.69.050 Special Regulations: ' i All second family units shall be subject to the following regulations: A. two—d-d��dl-lo are 60 ye is of age or over i I I I I � A. The floor area of the second family unit shall not exceed 640 square feet-or lesser.a-living area-whilch ever is 30 percent of the living area of the existing main dwelling where the unit is attached excepting that on lots 25% greater than minimum required area or larger, on a case by case review, the Community and Economic-Development Director may permit a gr,,aterpercentage of the living area as long as it is determined that there will be no adverse effects on adjacent parcels or the community. If the Director can not make such a determination the matter may be referred to the Planning Commission per Section 18.69.080. In addition, the floor area of the second family unit shall not exceed 10 percent of the subject site where the unit is detached In no instance shall any second family unit exceed 1,200 square feet in size nor be smaller than an area to provide for-an "efficiency unit" as defined by the Uniform Building Code. B. AnNi single familv detached dwelling,regardless of size of the living area may have at least an attached"efficiency unit"as defined by the Uniform Building Code provided all other requirements of this Ordinance are met. C. The applicant for a second family unit must be an owner-occupant of the main residence. D. A second family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon which a duplex, triplex apartment house or condominium is located. E. A second family unit project shall provide for landscape compensation for any removed trees or shrubs. F. _A second family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon which there is located more than one(1) dwelling unit. G. The second family unit may be rented but shall nofbe sold, transferred or assigned separately from the main single family dwelling- H. A maximum of one second family unit shall be permitted on a lot. I. The site in question must meet the minimum lot area requirements for the Zoning District in which it is located. J. _Land use(deed)restrictions must be recorded 'enforcing the conditions of the conditional use permit before the issuance of buitcling permits to construct the second family unit. K. Conventional metal-sided mobilehomes may not be used as a second family I I unit.' A manufactured home on a permanent foundation may be used as a second family unit provided said manufactured home meets the design requirements of Chapter 18.66 of the Zoning Code and the reauirelment for a conditional use permit with public hearing before the Planning Commission under Chapter 1&83 of the Zoning Code. 1 i i I Section 18.69.060 . Off Street Parking: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.60 for the main single family residence, one (1) parking space shall be provided for the second family unit or one (11 per each(bedroom in the unit whichever results in the g,eatest number of spaces being required. The required parking space for the second family unit may be uncovered, shall be located on the same lot as the second family unit, and shall meet the design standards of Chapter 18.60. I Section 18.69.070, Approval Criteria: In addition to the findings required in Chapter 18.83 for conditional use,permits with apublic hearing or in Chapter 18.84 for an administrative conditional use permit without a public hearing the Community and Economic Development Director or Planning Commission shall approve a second family unit only if the following findings can be made: I � i A. The addition fi i 11.1 is nicely integrated into the j "house envelop" and/or the site improving the appearance of the main residence and being an asset to the property. I � B. The second family unit is clearly subordinate in size, location,—and appearance and access to the main residence unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission following a public hearing: C. The sec ond familyunit shall conform to the color materials architectural style and detailin of the main residence and shall meet all other applicable building code requirements and development standards of the zone for single famil residential structures and accessory structures i _ D. The second family unit will not be detrimental to the;general health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing within the neighborhood of the proposed unit or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city. I Section 18.69.080 Administrative and Non- Administrative Conditional Use Permits: i i , I All second family units shall be subject to a conditional use 18.83 requiring public hearing (before the permit in accordance with Chapter 18.63. II I I Planning Commission for a detached type unit and with Chapter 18,84 alloy ine for an administrative review and approval by the Director without a public hearing for an attached e unit. These provisions shall apply in all cases unless the approval criteria s cified in this Chapter are not met for an attached Me unit in which case the matter shall be referred to the Planning Commission for apublic hearing as specified in Chapter 18.83 of the Zoning Code. Section 4. Table 18.10.030 shall be modified as follows: USES RH R20 R10 R7.2 R2 R3 t A. Residential Uses Single Family P P P P PA Pb (Detached), Full Second Family Unit C C C C C C (As Permitted Per Chapter 18.69 Section 5. The following footnotes shall be added to Table 18.10.030 as follows: Table 18.10.030 Footnotes a. A second single family detached unit (full sized single family detached dwelling)shall be permitted in the R2 zone provided that the lot or parcel in question meets the minimum area requirement for the R2 zone and that said lot or parcel is developed with no more than one single family detached dwelling. A site and architectural review application for the second family detached unit in accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code shall be required to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, all development standards of the underlying zone must be adhered to;and any division in ownership among the structures on the lot or parcel in question shall conform to the subdivision laws of the State and City. b. A second family detached unit (full sized single family detached dwelling) shall be permitted in the R3 zone provided that the lot or parcel in question meets the minimum area requirements for the R3 zone and that said lot or parcel is developed with no more than one single family detached dwelling. A site and architectural review application for the second family detached unit in accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code shall be required to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, all development standards of the underlying zone must be adhered to; and any division in ownership among the structures on the lot or parcel in question shall conform to the subdivision laws of the State and City. C. "T'stands for"Permitted Use" where the use is permitted by right; and"C" stands for"Conditional Use"where the use requires a conditional use permit., i Section 6. The'Negative Declaration, E-01-07, attached hereto, is'hereby approved. ' I I Section 7. Effective Date: The Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31 st day of its adoption. Section 8. Posting: The City.Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within fifteen(15)days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 9. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the { 2002 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the , 2002. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof. City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance wa's introduced and adopted at a regular; meeting of the City ', Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the , 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: I ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I City Clerk I Brenda Stanfill Approved as to form: City Attorney John Harper i I I I c:1MyFilesVOH \Secondunits`secondfamilyordinance i 1 II I I I I a f ' `1Tr eUND TER R C Community Development Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act,a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Z-01-01 and E-01-07, amendment to the Zoning Code(Title 18 of the Municipal Code) of the City of Grand Terrace to add certainAefinitions to Chapter 18.06 relative to second family unit and single family detached residential; and by amending Chapter-'l 8.69 regarding the provisions for second family units to comply-with State law;and by modifying Table 18.10.30 of the Zoning Code to allow for a second,full sized single family units in the City,s multifamily residential zones. The proposed revisions to the Second Unit Ordinance will result in only a minimal number of additional units,less ' than 100,over the next 20 years. The proposed revisions to the multifamily zones to allow a second, full sized, single family unit will not increase the number of projected residential units in the City. APPLICANT: City of Grand Terrace LOCATION: City Wide FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: Based on the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. eLampe, m Director of Planning Date race JL:ji c:\wp6l\..\planning\john\secondunits\E0107.nd ATTACHMENT 2 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 City of Grand Terrace I Community and Economic Development Department Environmental Checklist Form & Initial'Studv 1. Project Title: City of Grand Terrace General Plan Revision--,Amend the Zoning Code by Revising the Second Family UnitiOrdinance and by Allowing a Second, Full Sized Single Family Unit in the Multifamily Residential Zones 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: , City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number- Patrizia Materassi, Community and{Economic Development Director: (909)430-2247 4. Project Location: j City-Wide City of Grand Terrace,CA 92313 5. Project Sponsor's Name City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department I I 6. General Plan Designation: N/A i 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support,or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The proposed project is to prepare and add an amendment to the City of Grand Terrace's Zoning Code to add certain definitions to Chapter 18.06 relative to second family unit and single family detached residential;and by amending Chapter 18.69 regarding the provisions for second family units to comply with State law; and;by modifying Table 18.10.30 of the Zoning Code to allow for a second, full sized single family units in the City's multifamily residential zones. The proposed revisions to the Second Unit Ordinance will result in only a minimal number of addtional units,less than 100,over the next 20 years. The proposed revsions to the multifamily zones to allow a second,full sized,single family unit will not increase the number;of projected residential units in the City. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: N/A. East: N/A. South: N/A. West: N/A. I 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or p Ilrticipation agreement) None I � � I I I Community and Economic Development Department, 1 Initial Study,land Environmental ' I Analysis i I j � Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ® Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services O Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Services Systems ❑Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources S Aesthetics ❑Water ❑Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑Air Quality ❑Noise ❑ Recreation ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency): I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect ' 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Date Patrizia Materassi Community and Economic Development Director Printed-Name Title Community and Economic Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis ' I i I III I f i II �I I I � I l i it I i Evaluation of Environthental Impacts: i 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answer's that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply tol projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. _ the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based; on a project-specific screening analysis). r I 2) All answers must,take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well j as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less 1 than Significant'Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the bend of the i checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate' include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached,and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. I � i a I ' I i Community and Economic Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental j Analysis I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No- Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: _` Conflict with general plan designation or zoning- (Proposed amendments will modify zoning code which will, by definition eliminate conflicts; City's Housing Element of the General Plan calls for amending the ❑ ❑ ❑ Second Family Unit Ordinance to comply with State law, therefore amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan.) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (There are no known agencies where the proposed amendment would cause a conflict.) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (Zoning District Map, BRSP= Zoning Regulations, City Zoning Code) b "E Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.,, ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant agricultural resources in Grand Terrace) i e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ❑ ❑ ❑ established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (No specific development is proposed by the amendment to the Zoning Code. ) A brief explanation to answer I: The proposed amendment will modify the City's Zoning Code to bring about conformance of the Second Unit Ordinance with State Law and to allow for a second,full sized unit in the multifamily zones. These proposed changes will by definition be consistent with the City's Zoning Code and are consistent with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Such changes will not conflict with any applicable environmental plans or policies in the area. Provisions in the proposed Second Unit Ordinance will minimize incompatiblity with existing land use. Also,these proposed amendments to the Zoning Code will not affect agricultural resources(there are none to speak of in Grand Terrace)nor disrupt the physical arrangement of the community. Community and Economic Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated II. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: i a) Cumulatively exceed official regional'or local population projections? ( ) ❑ ❑ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area ❑ ❑ ❑ or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ❑ ❑ A brief explanation to answer II: The project roect is to revise the Cit 's Second Unit Ordinance. No more than 100 additional units are expected to proposed Y ! result from this amendment. These additional units would come about by the elimination of the conditional use permit requirement for attached,second units. This increase would amount to only approximately 2% of the existing number of dwelling units in the City. No increase in the number of dwelling units projected for the mutifamily residential zones is expected because the proposed Ordinance proposes to restrict any such lot or parcel with a second,full sized,single family unit to no more than two units on the lot or parcel. Therefore, no population projections are expected to pe exceeded; nor will these proposals be growth inducing. Lastly,the proposed amendments to the Z',I ning Code are proposing to add second type units; no displacement of existing housing will occur. III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General Plan MEA/EIR - ES-4) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking?(GP MEA/EIR-II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ E j MEA/EIR- II-1) d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ II-1) I ! e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ ❑ conditions from excavation, grading, 'or fill? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) g) Subsidence of the land? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, Append ❑ ❑ ❑ ' B) h) Expansive soil? (GP MEA/EIR II-1,;Append B-4 ) ❑ ❑ ❑ I) Unique geologic or physical features? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ II-1) Community and Economic Development Department 5 'Initial Study and 'Environmental ! ;Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated A brief explanation to answer III: The proposed project is to amend the City's Second Unit Ordinance and to allow a second, full sized single family residence-in the City's multifamily zones. All new structures resulting from these changes will be constructed in the City's residential zones where no identified geological hazards exist. In addtion,any such construction may require the submittal of a grading plan together with soils reports at the discretion of the Director of Building and Safety/Public ti Works. IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ ❑ rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR 11-1 Append B) b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ such as flooding? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR 11-1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ body? (GP MEA/EIR 11-1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑ movements? () f) Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through ❑ ❑ ❑ direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (GP MEA/EIR 11-1) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-1) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR 1 -1, ❑ ❑ ❑ and 97 Regional WCA Report) I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) A brief explanation to answer IV: All construction allowed by these proposed changes to the Zoning Code,to amend the Second Family Unit provisions and to allow a second, full sized,single family residence in the multifamily zones will have to comply with existing standards and requirements for residential construction including the provision that such development connect to a public sewer system or comply with those requirement of the State's Water Quality Control Board. Community and Economic Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis ' I ! II i Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ;❑ ❑ -A existing or projected air quality violation? (GP MEA/EIR H-14, and AQIN P) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ❑ contains an implementing action to reduce such exposure) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ proposals are included in the Element) I A brief explanation to answer V: The proposed project is for residential construction. No institutional uses are proposed which might expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. Also, no industrial or manufacturing uses are proposed which could conceivably alter air r movements or create objectionable odors. ! Community and Economic Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VI. Transportation/Circulatiou. Would the proposal result : _a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ (Trans. Engineering and Planning Consultant) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e-.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ❑ ❑ ❑ nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking,capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ❑ ❑ ❑ bicyclists? (TCM Ordinance 147) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (TCM Ordinance 147) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? O ❑ ❑ ❑ --'ef explanation to answer VI: The proposed project is an amendment to the Second Family Unit Ordiance and to modify the multifamily residential zones to allow a second,full sized,single family residence. Any increase in the number of dwelling units resulting from making it easier to obtain a Second Family Unit Ordinance because of the elimation of a conditional use permit for attached type second family units will be minimal. Therefore,the potential impact to City's traffic and circulation system will be minimal. No increase in the number of projected dwellings is expected from allowing a second,full sized,single family unit in the City's multifamily residential zones. a _ Community and Economic Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i I i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No j Significant Significant Significant iinpact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I I VII. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result i in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or ❑ ❑ their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20, Append C)' I b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage ❑ ❑ ❑ trees)? (GP MEAIEIR II-20) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ❑ { ❑ ❑ oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ❑ ❑ ❑ vernal pool)? ( ) 1 e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR'II-20) Brief explanation to answer VII: { The proposed project is,to revised the Second Unit Family Ordinance and to allow for a second,full sized,single family residential unit in the multifamily zones. All such development resulting from these modifcations will take place within the existing residential areas of the City. Each proposal will be qualified for a"Categorically Exemption"under CEQA. Because of these factors,no adverse impacts to any b;ological resources are expected. VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: j a) Conflict with adopted energy ❑ ❑ ❑ I conservation plans? (GP MEA/EIR H-19, and Append D) b) Use non-renewable resources in a ❑ ❑ ❑ wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (GP MEA/EIR H-19, and Append B) Community.and Economic Development Department 9 Initial Study,and Environmental Analysis i Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer VIII: No mineral resources have been identified in the City.The proposed amendments to the Zoning Code are,not expected to affect energy, conservation plans or non-renewable-resources.No potential adverse impacts to energy or mineral resources are expected to result from implementation of the project. r � IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑ release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (GP MEA/EIR 11-7) b) Possible interference with ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (GT Emergency Plan, and GP MEA/EIR II-13) c) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ ❑ ❑ potential health hazard? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Exposure of people to existing ❑ ❑ ❑ sources of potential health hazards? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ ❑ 70 flammable brush, grass, or trees? (GP MEA/EIR II-6) Brief explanation to answer IX: The proposed amendments to the City's Zoning Code will result in residential construction. No hazardous conditions are expected to result from this additional residential con§O,uction. Any such construction in a fire hazardous area would have to comply fully with all requirements of i i.,e County of San Bernardino Fire Department. Community and Economic Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact i Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X. Noise. Would the proposal result in: i a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ l (GP MEA/EIR II-1 Q) b) Exposure of people to severe noise ❑ ❑ ❑ levels? (GP MEA/EIR II-10) Brief explanation to answer X. The proposed project is to amend the Second Family Unit Ordinance and to allowia second, full sized, residential unit in the multifamily zones will not increase noise levels. In addition,any construction resulting from these amendments in areas of high ambient noise levelawould have to insulate the interiors from outside noise. ' � I XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an III , effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: 1 a) Fire protection? ( ) ❑ I ❑ ❑ b) Police.protection? O ❑ i ❑ ❑ c) Schools? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, ❑ ❑ including roads? ( ) e) Other governmental i services? ( ) ❑ ❑ a Brief explanation of answer XI. The proposed project is to amend the Second Family Unit Ordinance and to allowla second, full sized,single family residential unit in the multifamily zones. As noted above in the project description,no significant numbers of dwelling units are expected to result from these amendments. J I I I I i I Community and Economic Development Department 11 Initial Study sand Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X1I. Utilities and Services Systems.•Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alternations to the following �- utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ NIEA/EIR 11-32, H-33) b) Communications systems? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ .\1EA1'EIR II-33) c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑ ❑ distribution facilities? (GP MEA/EIR 11-30) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR 11-30) e) Storm water drainage? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ N EA/EIR II-33) f) Solid waste disposal? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ J MEA/EIR 1I-32) g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR II-30) Brief explanation of answer XII. The proposed project is to amend the Second Family Unit Ordinance and to allow a second,full sized,single family residential unit in the multifamily zones. As noted above in the project description, no significant numbers of dwelling units are expected to result from these amendments and no need for expansion of utility,serves are contemplated. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ highway? (GP MEA/EIR R-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ ❑ aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ Community and Economic Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer XIII. There are no scenic highways in Grand,Terrace to be effected by these proposed changes. In addition,the small number of units anticipated under these changes will not affect any scenic vistas in the community. The proposed changes to require a review of the design and appearance of the second family units; and the full sized single family units will require a site and architectural review. These requirements will provide the mechanisms to insure that ; the development will not have a negative aesthetic effect nor create glare onto adjacent residential parcels. In addition,the proposed Second Family Unit Ordinance contains requirements to insure that the resulting projects are aethetically compatible with the adjoining areas. XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: j a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR II-20) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑ j ❑ (GP MEAIEIR II-20) c) Affect-historical resources? GP ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR H-22) d) Have the potential to cause a ❑ ❑ ❑ physical change which would affect I unique ethnic cultural values? (GP j N4EA/EIR 1I-22) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred ❑ ❑ ❑ uses within the potential impact j area? I Brief explanation to answer XIV. Implementation of the proposed amendments to the Second Family Unit Ordinance and to thell lmultifamily zolnes to' allow a second,full sized,single-family;residence are not expected to result in ad erse impacts relative to cultural resources. i i I XV. Recreation. Would the proposal: it a) Increase the demand for ❑ ❑ ❑ neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (GP MEA/EIR II-21) I Ih b) Affect existing recreational ❑ ❑ I❑ opportunities? (GP MEA/EIR II-21) it I i Community and Economic Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer XV. The relative small increase in the numbers of dwellings projected for the City will not result in any increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. Nor will such a small number affect existing recreational opportunities in the City. i r Community and Economic Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. i a) Does the project have the potential ❑ I ❑ I❑ to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal j community, reduce'the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the major,periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential ❑ ❑ ❑ to achieve short-term, to the 1 disadvantage of long-term, environmental goal's? c) Does the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ '❑ are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when { viewed in connection with the ! I effects of past projects, the effects of other'current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? i i I Community and Economic Development Department 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answers XVI. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of revising the Second Family Unit Ordinance to bring about its conformance with State Law and to modify the multifamily residential zones to allow a second, full sized, single family residence. As discussed above the increase in the u number of residential units over projections made under the General Plan are expected to be very minimal. Therefore, any such amendments to'the City's Zoning Code will result in less than a significant impact. XVII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program'EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EK or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. �� ■ Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. ■ Not Applicable c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are"Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site-specific conditions for the project. ® Not Applicable Community and Economic Development Department 16 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis. ' I I I I � Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless (Impact Mitigation Incorporated PM:JL:jl Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Dept Authority:Public Resources Code Sections 21083,and 21087. References: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),21080.1,21080.3,21082.1,21083,21083.31:21093,21094;21151;Sunstrom v. County of Mendocino,202 Cal.App.3d 296(1988);Leonoff v.Monterey Board of Supervisors;22 Cal.App.3d 1337(1990) I I c:\wp61�.\planning\john\Secondunits1E0107.is I I i i ' I ' � I ' I I I I i I i I ' I II i Community and Economic Development Department 17 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I DATE: April 3,2002 (: �1 W.O.# 12-2.1103 v COMM S: - ,,, •cam%.. - r h-a� •;.�.1'x'• a_-;,yam-•a--�._ .,,ts'yr.,.t•..a- yz,-.u,.,;:£ rx.-.,',,•:•,._s x:�Y•.. ,�.i { :-• �Ta r ,{ '!'�-;.. a''.� `�'•'L t�:...9;-- ..3!"s. w'•l"""r..:.:st�'{yr'n�"5'.�a' (;,sy'.`:CS•;.•;. .tir�� yJ't:.'.�'V.'•.ZjS3>1.•:�'"!-,'.�,L. - �•• t^ w b•,,t��;i*.t,,P,1"z�m;r,�e"`,-ems 1 P�.;es'�l�.Tf��'ha-.<•.aA�,x�y�, ..elf x�°v��•yi2. •.i-_ _ ,:..1'f'��."w�il^i�.�;. -t;•:�,•5�61"h",'}-+�' �� a T+��O3}T�.lt•.-•.'', 1 ., ¢ ,��jj1 •Ar l'w - .:. , �. ! Yie'. =a"s$Y,r�'.�Ft4'S'.ir�:= •:-. _ =?•.:..- :44�'H..,t.:i:'itt�''' CR.A() COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: April 11, 2002 Q's SUBJECT: Final Approval of Parcel-Map No. 15780 U O�S� GH 1I FUNDING REQUIRED— NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING&SAFETY, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15780 located at.the end of Palm Avenue was previously approved PUBLIC WORKS- by the Planning Commission on October 18, 2001 and approved by the City Council on AND HOUSING November 8, 2001. 22795 Barton Road Suite B Conditions have been met,therefore it is appropriate for the City Council to approve Final Grand Terrace Parcel Map No. 15780 California 92313-5295 Civic Center (909) 825-3825 STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: Fax(909) 825-7506 1. Approve final Parcel Map No. 15780. 2. Request the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the map. 3. Direct the Department of Building&Safety to cause the recording of the Parcel Map. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. Pl-':�► ` LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES INLAND EMPIRE ,DIVISION 'LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE MEETING INVITATION . Thursday, March 28, 2002 Time: 2:00 p.m: to 4:00 p.m. Location: Training Room, 2Id Floor (NEW,ROOM LOCATION) Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive AGENDA ACTION ITEMS A. League Fiscal Initiative Initiative will not move forward in November of 2002. There is the potential to still go forward in the November 2004 election. Discussion on the need to keep the electorate-educated. Cities are encouraged to adopt a resolution for the League's Action for Better Cities Volunteer Check-off Program. ACTION: 1. Each city identify four to five large city stakeholderstmajor city players to hear the city message. Provide to Nancy Cisneros for contact (ncisneros@cacities.org or (909) 377- 7110). 2. To review attached master media list and provide input for additions or deletions. B. Housing 1. SB910/AB2863 Chair Garcia announced letters sent on Task Force support for AB2863/Longville. Plaques of appreciation were presented to Assemblyman Longville and Senator Soto on March 21, 2002 at the Division Dinner. 2.- Julie Bornstein Meeting Status of Bornstein of event: A reception is being planned to introduce region elected officials and housing leaders to State Housing Department Director Bornstein in Ontario area. Goal to have plan ready for April meeting and May event. ACTION: Each city requested to send local housing organizations/partners to be, included in invitations to event. Send to - Nancy Cisneros. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Nat C92 a ' I I C. Transportation Darren Kettle 'discussed recent 210/215 funding. SANBAG is looking at Garvey Bond to assist funding of 1'-215 widening. Garvey Bond would be a back-up plan, should appeal to California Transportation Commission (CT.C) for upfront funding fail. This would keep the projects on track. Upcoming Measure I renewal approval by voters depends on having a positive solution for the 1-215I project. r Mayor Valles will join SANBAG in testifying to the CTC. ACTION: Informational Only i D. League of California Cities Action Days — Sacramento 1. Make plans to attend May 15t' and 16th 2. ;Report�on Joint Legislative Dinner, May 15t' with Inland (Empire, Desert Mountain, and Riverside Divisions I i ACTION: RSVP for Joint Legislative Dinner f Each city to make personal contact with their local state legislators to attend. I , E. Legislation 1. AB 680 (Steinberg) Sales Tax Sharing Pilot Program i ACTION: Informational Only 1 F. Report on Status! of Cities approving Division Priorities i 1 ACTION: Informational Only G. Grassroots Network Progress Report — Cisneros ACTION: Informational Only i RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION CHECK-OFF PROGRAM WHEREAS, as a"general rule, communities are in a better position than State government to make decisions governing local affairs, educate the citizenry as to the benefits of strong local government, and advocate on behalf of cities; and WHEREAS,measures enacted through the legislative process,as well as by statewide ballot initiatives over the past 20 years,have produced the unintended consequences of destabilizing city finances and have weakened the ability of city residents to govern local affairs through their elected community representatives; and WHEREAS, several statewide commissions and study groups are preparing recommendations for local government reform,which may be considered by the voters through the initiative process, and cities may wish to propose changes proactively, as well; and WHEREAS,many of the"local government reform"changes proposed by others which will appear on a statewide ballot are likely to further weaken constitutional protections of local self- determination unless information is provided to the voters using conventional campaign methods; and WHEREAS,Action for Better Cities was created by the Board of Directors of the League of California Cities for that purpose; and WHEREAS, elected and appointed official in local government have the opportunity to provide leadership in Action for Better Cities through voluntary financial assistance; and WHEREAS,monies collected by Action for Better Cities shall be limited to those programs and efforts intended specifically for strengthening the position of local government. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE r DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. There is hereby established the Voluntary Contribution Check-Off Program of the City of Grand Terrace. Section 2. Any member of the City Council or City employee of the City of Grand Terrace is eligible to participate in the program. Section 3. The purpose ofthe Program is to allow a member of the City Council to direct the City of Grand Terrace to remit a portion of the salary payable,,as approved by the City Council, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO J I to charitable, educational, governmental, or other purposes for which non-profit mutual benefit corporations are organized. Section 4. Participation in the Program is voluntary. I Section 5. The City Manager is directed to do all things necessary and proper to implement the Program established by this Resolution including, but not limited to, preparing appropriate forms to be completed by participating city council members, informing city council members of the full range of charitable,educational,governmental,or other purposes for which non- t profit mutual benefit corporations are organized, carrying out the direction of the participating city 1 council members by remitting a portion of their salary, as stated in the appropriate forms. Section 6. In establishing this Program,the City Council specifically wishes tq make its support known for a voluntary contribution check-off to support the mission and objectives of Action for Better Cities. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this I Ith day of April, 2002. j ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace- Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof I I I BRENDA STANT LL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular, meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 11`t' day of April, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: I I ABSTAIN: i I Approved as to form: I City Attorney City Clerk [:::STAFFREP0RT CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: April 11, 2002 SUBJECT: RESCHEDULE BUDGET MEETING The City Council has scheduled a special meeting to discuss the FY2002-2003 Preliminary Budget on May 14`h. Subsequent to scheduling that meeting it was discovered that the date conflicts with a Technology Committee Meeting in Sacramento. Mayor Pro Tern Garcia is the Chairman of that Committee and is requesting that Council consider rescheduling the budget meeting. Staff is requesting that Council consider this request to provide an opportunity for all Council Members to attend and provide input on the budget. Staff Recommends Council: Reschedule the FY2002-2003 Budget Meeting { Col' N1GiL AGENDA ITEM Nye ��