Loading...
12/12/2002 FILE COPY, GZFnD TERR CE December 12, 2002 22795-Barton,Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 i Civic Center (909).824-6621 Fax(909)783-7629. /� /� Fax(909)783-2600 CITY OF G1�C1 NR TERRACE Dan Buchanan Mayor " CRA/CITY_COUNCIL Lee Ann Garcia Mayor Pro Tern REGULAR MEETINGS. , ' }Ierman Hilkey DonLarkin 2ND AND 4TH'Thursdays - 6-00 p.m. nlalyetta Ferr6. ' „ Council Members 'Thomas J.Schwab City Manager Council Chambers' _'_Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Bart6n Road Grand Terrace,,CA 92313-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 12, 2002 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 7:30 P.M.. 22795 Barton Road OU:: "IE CT�OF�1 99A IF Y ISABIIIT SSA.WITHD�AIVIERICANS. `"LIEWITI3 THE TERRACE.COIVIP S '=THE:CITY-OF.GRAND . ,..,^,. _ AL:ASSIS.TANCE TO:.PARTICIPATE IN-TIIIS MEETING•PI EASE CAIh::TH&CITY CLERK'& REQUIRE.SPECI . - ., P T" 909.r824.,6621.AT<.LEAST,48$OURS. RIOR TOTHE-MEETING: x •_ " UU.DESIRE._TO.,ADDRESS.;THE.CITY CO:UNGIL.DURING,THE MEETING;O'THER`THAN LtNDEIt PUBLIC ; IF Y, COM1VIElYT,:.YOU ARE-ASKED;TO;PLEASE COMPLETE AREQUEST TO SPEAK FORIVI'AVAILABLE AT„THE' ..ENTRANCE;AND:PRE3ENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WII,L BE CALLED UPON<BY THE MAYOR AT AP TIME:, * Call to Order- * Invocation- r * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Special Presentations to Outgoing Mayor Dan Buchanan 2. Swear In Newly Elected Council Members Herman Hilkey and Bea Cortes 3. Election of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern 4. Review and Assign Representatives/Alternates to Various Assign - S - Organizations ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL MEETING CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. ,Approval of 11-13-2002 Minutes Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any.Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar.for discussion. A. Approval of Check Register Dated November 28,2002;and Approve December 12,2002 COUNCIL AGENDA 12-12-2002 PAGE 2 OF 2 AGENDA ITEMS ! [STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION _ B. Ratify 12-12-2002 CRAjAction I C. Waive.Full.Reading of Ordinances on Agenda ' D. Approval of November 13,2002 Minute's Approve E. Authorization to go to B'd-Rollins Park Renovation Authorize Project 4. PUBLIC COMMENT I 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports I , 1. Crime Prevention Committee a. Minutes of October 14,2002 1 Accept I 2. Historical&Cultural Activities Committee r a. Minutes of November 4,2002 Accept 3. Emergency Operations Committee I a. Minutes of December 2,2002 i Accept B. Council Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS I A. Resolution Approving and Certifying the;City's Bicycle Approve : Transportation Plan;and Authorizing the City Manager to r Submit said Plan to the;Appropriate Reviewing Agencies I ' for Approval and to Seek,Funding for the Bikeway,Projects,- Identified Herein B. Tentative Parcel Map No. 02701 (County,Surveyor Approve Number 16012)and E-02-13 to Divide a123;866'Square Foot Parcel Located on theNorthwest Corner of Stonewood Dr.and,De Berry St.into Two-Lots of 15,806 I _ Square Feet-and 8,060 Square Feet 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None { 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Measure I Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)Re-allocation Re-allocate' B. Community Development Block Grant Program 2003- 2004: City Proposal j 9. CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY.,JANUARY 9,12003. I ....................................................................................... AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 01-09-2003 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY,CLERK'S I OFFICE BY NOON 01-02-2003! { I ' STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: December 12, 2002 SUBJECT: REVIEW AND ASSIGN REPRESENTATIVES/ALTERNATES TO VARIOUS GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS �. Each election year it is necessary to review and make appointments to various government organizations. Below is a list of the organizations with the current representatives. Omnitrans Representative: Herman Hilkey Alternate: Don Larkin SCAG Representative: Lee Ann Garcia Alternate: Maryetta Ferre San Bernardino Valley Water Representative: Don Larkin District Advisory Committee Alternate: Lee Ann Garcia League of California Cities Representative: Lee Ann Garcia Inland Empire Division Alternate: Dan Buchanan City Selection Committee Representative: Dan Buchanan SANBAG Representative: Herman Hilkey Alternate: Lee Ann Garcia Solid Waste Task Force Representative: Herman Hilkey Alternate: Tom Schwab Omnitrans Tec. Advisory Representative: Steve Berry Alternate: Tom Schwab California Joint Powers Representative: Don Larkin Insurance Authority'(Board Alternate: Tom Schwab of Directors) Alternate: Steve Berry San Bernardino County Gang Representative: Maryetta Ferre &Drug Task Force Partnership Strategy Review Representative: Maryetta Ferre Committee North-South Transportation Representative: Herman Hilkey Corridor Committee Alternate: Lee Ann Garcia COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No® j PENDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING-NOVEMBER 13,2002 A special meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on November 13, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Dan Buchanan, Chairman, Lee Ann Garcia,Vice-Chairman Herman Hilkey,Agency Member Don Larkin, Agency Member Maryetta Ferr6,Agency Member Tom Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Larry Ronnow,Finance Director Jerry Glander, Building& Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director Lt. Guerra, Sheriff's Department ABSENT: Steve Berry, Assistant'CityManager v r John Harper, City Attorney APPROVAL OF 10-24-2002 MINUTES CRA-2002-48 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER FERRE, SECOND BY VICE CHAIRMAN GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the October 24, 2002 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes, COMBINED CASH AND• INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 2002 CRA-2002-49 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for Quarter ended September 30, 2002. CLOSED SESSION-REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS, 22208 CARHART CLOSED SESSION-REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS, APN#1-167-261-01 Chairman Buchanan announced that the Agency met in Closed Session to discuss Real Estate Negotiations for 22208Carhart and APN#1167-261-Oland no reportable action was taken. CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. , I 1 I Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes November 13,2002 Page 2 I I ' Chairman Buchanan adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 7:40 p.m.until j the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday,December 12,2002 at 7:30 p.m. i I , I SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace ' � I CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace I I I I f I I I I I I I J 'I I I ' I I i I ' I I i I I ' I J I I { r Check Register Date(`'- 'member 28, 2002 l - vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50824 11/7/2002 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN 110702 NOVEMBER STIPEND CHECK 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 Total : 400.00 50825 11/18/2002 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 11802 PERS FOR PAYROLL END 11/8/02 10-022-62-00 - 4,255.93 Total : 4,255.93 50826 11/18/2002 001365 BARBU, DRAGOS S. 112002 BIRTHDAY BONUS 10-380-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 50827 11/18/2002 010137 DUNLOP, KAREN 112302 BIRTHDAY BONUS 10-440-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 50828 11/18/2002 001391 BERRY, STEVE 112402 BIRTHDAY BONUS 10-180-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 50829 11/20/2002 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3072/3073 NOV. NEWSLTR &COMM. CALENDAR 0 10-125-213-000-000 1,120.75 0 Total : 1,120.75 . Z 50830 11/20/2002 010070 BEARDSLEY, KEVIN 111902 VIDEO CAMERA SERVICES ® 10-125-250-000-000 165.00 r 10-180-255-000-000 75.00 > Total : 240.00 50831 11/20/2002 001907 COSTCO#478 110902 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 49.21 } 10-440-228-000-000 14.08 Total : 63.29 ,`r.l 50832 11/20/2002 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 102602 5 cell phones serv./B & S 34-400-235-000-000 205.37 0 J Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50832 11/20/2002 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA (Continued) Total: 205.37 50833 11/20/2002 006681 SMART& FINAL 38482/37913 AFTER SCHOOL SUPPLIES 10-440-223-000-000 97.90 _ -Total : 97.90 50834 11/20/2002 006680 SMART& FINAL IRIS COMPANY 0044855 COUNTRY FAIR SUPPLIES 10-804-220-000-000 67.82 Total : 61.82 50835 11/20/2002 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY Oct. 2002 ELECTRICITY-STREET LIGHTS - -- - - -- - -- 10-450=238=000=000----- - - -- --- —" 20:85- 26-602-238-000-000 58.10 26-601-238-000-000 41.50 26-600-238-000-000 49.80 16-510-238-000-000 4,188.59 Total : 4,358.84 50836 11/21/2002 004350 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, INLA 112002 Division Dinner Mtq 11/21/02 10-110-270-000-000 70.00 10-120-270-000-000 35.00 Total : 105.00 r f -50837---11/27/2002-010019--5-POINT AUTO SERVICE" - - 4277-- -"- -- -CNG van-battery -- -- - 10-440-272-000-000 75.00 Total : 75.00 50838 11/27/2002 001145 AMATEUR ELECTRONIC SUPPLY 1479069-01 fin chq -7.72 ---- 1479069-01A COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 10-808-247-000-000 176.46 10-808-246-000-000 338.51 Total : 522.69 50839 11/27/2002 001185. APPLIANCE DOCTOR 009384 Comm. Ctr heater vent service 10-440-245-000-000 60.00 - - Total : - - 60.00 —_ Page: 2 r vchlist V'- -:her List Page: 3 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50840 11/27/2002 010063 BALLOON TEAM PROMOTIONS 102102 Halloween Haunt balloons 23-200-64-00 103.87 Total : 103.87 50841 11/27/2002 001381 BARHAM CONSULTING SVCS 53013 Consulting 8/27-11/19/2002 - 44-200-620-000-000 1,600.00 47-100-250-001-000 650.00 46-200-264-000-000 1,225.00 44-200-255-000-000 1,800.00 32-600-204-000-000 75.00 10-180-255-000-000 300.00 Total : 5,650.00 -508 -t2iEf26{i2-9 3 10-189=zG8=466=(�86-- =3G59- Total : --56.513 50843 11/27/2002 001456 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 381068 Office Supplies 10-370-210-000-000 214.74 475707 Office supplies 10-180-210-000-000 24.42 499503 Xerox paper/toner cartridge 10-190-212-000-000 88.80 10-140-210-000-000 121.80 10-190-212-000-000 6.88 10-140-210-000-000 9.44 Total : 466.08 50844 11/27/2002 001488 BUCHANAN, DAN NOV. 2002 Nov. Council%Agency stipends 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 Total : 400.00 50845 11/27/2002 001662 CA. MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICER 9927 2003 Annual Dues-Schwab 10-120-265-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 50846 11/27/2002 010102 CALIF. ASSOC. OF CODE ENFORCE. 111902 2003 MEMBER. DUES-OWENS Page: 3 vchlist , Voucher List Page: 4 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50846 11/27/2002 010102 CALIF. ASSOC. OF CODE ENFORCE. (Continued) 34-800-265-000-000 40.00 Total : 40.00 50847 11/27/2002 001762 CITY CLERKS ASSOC/CALIFORNIA 111902 2002-03 annual member dues - - -- ----- ----- - --- - --------- - -- - - - - — - - - - - = 25--265-000-000 - -- 120.00-- Total : 120.00 50848 11/27/2002 001846 CLEANING SERVICES 014 CLEANING SERVICES 34-400-246-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 50849 11/27/2002 001907 COSTCO#478 111602140249 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 8_32 10-440-228-000-000 18.38 Total : 26.70 50850 11/27/2002 010067 D.P.S. CONSTRUCTION 02-19 REHAB 22208 CARHART 34-700-7.75-000-000 19,302.03 Total : 19,302.03 50851 11/27/2002 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B462075 LEGAL ADVERTISING - -- - - - - -- - 10-125-230-000-000 178.12 - - - - -- - -- ---- ---------- - ----- --- Total : 178.12 50852 11/27/2002 001937 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY 72119903 DANKA USAGE 10-172-246-000-000 20.18 _ 10-175-246-000-000 25.23 34-400-246-000-000 - 55.51 Total : 100.92 50853 11/27/2002 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 3199 Oct. lawn serv-22293 Barton 34--700-767-000-000 40.00 Total : 40.00 50854 11/27/2002 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA 112102 Reimburse L. Beach conf. expenses 10-110-270-000-000 44.50 Page: -4— vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50854 11/27/2002 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA (Continued) Nov. 2002 Nov. Council/Agency Stipends 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 Total : 444.50 50855 11/27/2002 002710 FOX OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL CT. 9779 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 10-190-224-000-000 222.00 Total : 222.00 50856 11/27/2002 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 32050198 PARK MAINT AND SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 13.32 32050310 PARK MAINT AND SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 22.58 Total : 35.90 50857 11/27/2002 002904 G.T. FIRE& RESCUE ASSOCIATION Nov. 2002 Nov. 2002 Larkin stipend donation 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 250.00 50858 11/27/2002 002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN 112102 Reimburse mileage exp-L.Beach 10-110-270-000-000 36.50 Nov. 2002 Nov. 2002 Council/Agency stipends 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 Total : 436.50 50859 11/27/2002 002867 GOLDEN PROTECTIVE SERVICES 19321 RUBBER GLOVES-child carre - 10-440-228-000-000 343.94 Total : 343.94 50860 11/27/2002 002910 GRAND TERRACE LIONS CLUB 100102 Comm Ctr Rent Oct 2002-June 2003 10-440-246-000-000 1,800.00 - Total : 1,800.00 50861 11/27/2002 003152 HARPER & BURNS LLPN Oct. 2002 Oct. Legal Services 10-160-250-000-000 1,207.50 Page: 5 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ` Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50861 11/27/2002 003152 HARPER& BURNS LLPN (Continued) Total : 1,207.50 50862 11/27/2002 003210 HOME DEPOT 11/13/02 BARTON RD BEAUTIFICATION L 10-450-710-000-000 85.55 585/5------ _ SMALL TOOLS - -- ------ --. - ----� --- ------ =--- - _------�--�------ --10=180=218=000=000--��------- -- - 6.29 586/8----- HARWARE SUPPLY 10-450-245-000-000 12.27 593/4092057 HARWARE SUPPLY 10-180-245-000-000 23.47 614/6080154 Sr. Ctr_Roof 10-805-245-000-000 36.02 666/4041326 BARTON RD BEAUTIFICATION - 10-450-710-000-000 85.55 Total : 249.15 50863 11/27/2002 003216 HOUSTON &'HARRIS 8252 SEWER _HYDRO WASHING 21-573-602-0007000 846.25 Total : 846.25 50864 11/27/2002 003490 INMAR_ K/VICTOR 13773 NAMETAGS 10-804-220-000=000 42.79 -- - -- --- -=- - - - -- - -- -- - --- --- - - - - - ----_- -- ---�_-- ----------------Total :------ - ---42.79- -- 50865 11/27/2002 003850 JANI-KING OF COLTON 11020014 CHILDCARE BUILDING CLEANING_ 10-440-244-000-000 815.00 11020297 Clean carpets - - -- - 1-0440=244=000=000- 85.00� Total : 900.00 50866 11/27/2002 003867 K. D. SALES 106444 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 173.06 1"06444a Park plumbling supplies 10-450-245-000-000 52.63 Total : 225.69 50867 11%27/2002 004316 LARKIN, DON Nov. 2002 Nov. 2002 Agency stipend Page:-6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM J CITY OF GRAND TERRACE t Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50867 11/27/2002 004316 LARKIN, DON (Continued) 32-200-120-000-000 150.00- Total : . 150.00 50868 11/27/2002 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 26169 LAWNMOWER REPAIRS ' 10-180-246-000-000 25.86 Total : 25.86 50869 11/27/2002 004380 LEGEND BUILDING MAINTENANCE OCT102002333• JANITORIAL SERVICES 10-180-2.45-0.00-000 250.00 Total : 250.00 50870 11/27/2002 004670 MIRACLE MILE CAR WASH. 564182 VEHICLE'MAINTENANCE 10-180-272-000-000 - 20.42 10-440-272-000-000 8.00 Total : 28.42 50871 11/27/2002 005529 PACIFIC BELL OCT. 2002 OCT. DSL/PHONE CHARGES 10-190-235-000-000 179.65 10-440-235-000'-000 51.98 10-450-235-000-000 53.91 Total : 285.54 50872 11/27/2002 005584 PETTY CASH 111802 Petty cash reimbursement 10-180-245-000-000 27.76 10-180-272-000-000 -8.86 10=190-210-000-000 13.87 -10-370-210-000=000 1.50 10-380-210-000-060 7.50 10-450-245-000-000 29.16 10-808-246-000-000 45.82 10-808-247-000-000 19.10 16-900-220-000-000 13.88 23-200-61-00 23.47 23-200-64-00 50.27 34-800-270-000-000 22.13 Total : 263.32 Page: 7 vchlist Voucher List , Page: 8 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50873 11/27/2002 005586' PETTY CASH 111402 Reimburse petty cash-child care 10-440-223-000-000 212.25 10-440-228-000-000 -4;84 10-440-221-000=000 16.15 - - _ Total': 233.24. 50874 11/27/2062 005673 RENTAL SERVICE_CORPORATION 14269379-003. WELDER FORMAINTENANCE 10-180-710-000-000 2,000.00 10-180-710-000-000 155'.00 Total : 2;155.00 50875---11/27/2002 010081- RIC-K-ENGINEERING-COMPANY=CALIF---_ -1-5535---------Reimbursable expenses 10-370-250-000-000 22.30 Total : 22.30 50876 11/27/2002 010139 ROSENKILD, ROCHELLE 111302 Reimburse fair-supplies - 10-804-220-000-000 41.53 Total : 41.53 50877 11/27/2002 006341 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. 110602 TRACK TAX INCREMENT 34-4.00-251-000-000 716.25 Total : 716.25 50878 11/27/2002-006453T S.B.COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER • 380 - BOOKING FEES T 10-410-259-000-000 - 958.32 Total : 968.32 50879 11/27/2002 006557 S.B. COUNTY DEPT: PUBLIC WORKS FC080/03 : FLOOD CONTROL SERVICES ----- - -----=---- -----=------ �—.— -=-----_ ---------.- T 12-903-701-000-000- — J �-- 1,600.00 Total : 1,600.00 50880 - 11/27/2002 006505 S.B. COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2002-09 Fuel-child care van 10-440-272-000-000 39.34 = Total: 39.34 '50881 11/27/2002 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 3229 02-03 SHERRIFFS CONTRACT Page:-8 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE - Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50881 11/27/2002 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF (Continued) 14-411-256-000-000 4,778.99 10-410-256-000-000 82,279.10 10-410-255-000.-000 2,268.91 3229a 02-03 SHERRIFFS CONTRACT 10-410-256-000-000 166.62 3229b 02-03 SHERRIFF OVERTIME 10-410-250-000-000 4,051.21 Total : 93,544.83 50882 11/27/2002,006560 S.B. COUNTY WASTE SYSTEMS DIV. t-05426 DUMP CHARGES - 16-900-253-0'00-000 58.57 Total 58.57 50883 11/27/2002 010109 SAN MANUEL BOTTLED WATER GROUP Oct. 2002 BOTTLED WATER SERVICE 10-190-238-000-000 180.15 10-440-238-000-000 134.04 10-805-238-000-000 51.75 34-400-238-000-000 40.58 Total : 407.12 50884 11_/27/2002 006620 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE 162375, - Repair supplies - - - 10-180-245-000-000 83:46 -Total : 83.46 50885 11/27/2002 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY OCT."2002 NATURAL GAS-CITY FACILITIES 10-440-238-000-000 30.60 10-190-238-000-000 148.86 10-805-238-000-000 13.27 15-500-601-000-000 17.75 Total : 210.48 50886 11/27/2002 010131 SOUTHWEST BOULDER&STONE 0052763-IN LANDSCAPE BOULDERS - 10-450-710-000-000 849:87 Total : 849.87 50887 11/27/2002 006780 STANFILL, BRENDA 112102 Reimburse SCCCA expense 10-125-270-000-000 30.00 Page: 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50887 11/27/2002 006780 STANFILL, BRENDA (Continued) Total : 30.00 50888 11/27/2002 010100 STRATEX INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS 1305 VIDEO RECORDER, MONITOR, PRINTER, CABLE 10-410-701-000-000 6,900.00 - Total : 6,900.00 50889 11/27/2002 010136 SWRCB FEES 0215026 ANNUAL FEES 10-631-255-000-000 1,500.00 Total : 1,500.00 50890 11/27/2002 006880 SYLVAN/IDENTIX Oct. 2002 Oct. fingerprints-Luckman --> = - - - 10=440=228=000-000 - - - - -- - -- - - ------97:00 - - Total : 97.00 50891 11/27/2002 006898 SYSCO 2110610991 CHILD CARE FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-060 560.45 2111315640 Child Care FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 476.80 Total : 1,037.25 50892 11/27/2002 006980 TEXACO/SHELL 800020968721 Oct. Fuel-city vehicles 10-180-272-000-000 493.13 - 16-900_254-000-000_ _ _132.47 34-800-272-000-000 13.86 Total : 639.46 50893 11/27/2002 010140 THE OUTBACK REPTILE CO. 252800102 Pet care supplies-child care 10-440-228-000-000 46.73 - - --- ------ ------- ----------- ------ -- --- --------------- -------- - --- ----- ,------------------- Total : 46.73 50894 11/27/2002 007795 WAXIE 55705255 03 Child Care JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10-440-228=000-000 217.45 55846828 03 Park maint supplies 10-450-245-000-000 17.80 Total : 235.25 50895 11/27/2002 -007843 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 26014 PLANTING 10-450-710-000-000 4,175.00 _ P-age: 1-0 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 11/25/2002 3:27:24PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50895 11/27/2002 007843 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC (Continued) 26166 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 16-900-260-000-000 5,208.00 26166a Tree removal 16-900-260-000-000 1,138.00 Total : 10,521.00 50896 11/27/2002 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 140275 PEST CONTROL 10-180-245-000-000 95.00 10-440-245-000-000 35.00 10-805-245-000-000 28.00 34-400-246-000-000 32.00 Total : 190.00 50897 11/27/2002 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 089669560 July 5345D copier fee 10-190-246-000-000 130.00. 0.92093616 LEASE OF XEROX 460 DIGITAL COPIER 10-190-700-000-000 421.19 Total : 551.19 ######4H 11/14/2002 007400 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. : 111402 MO LEASE PAYMENTS 33-300-206-000-000 22,579.19 Total : 22,579.19 75 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 191,641.55 75 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 191,641.55 I dert:ify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and- appropriate expenditures for the operation of the. City and Agency. -Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 11 Check Register Dated December 12, 2002 vchlist Voucher List _Page: 1 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher "Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50898 12/2/2002 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 112202 PER$ FOR PAYROLL END 11/22/02 10-022-62-00 - 4,309.25 Total : 4,369.25 - 50899- -12/3/2002- 001038--- VERIZON-WI REL-ESS=LA -------- Ia477850011-1----Oct/Nov.-Cell-Send.--child-care ---` ---- -" 10-440-235-000-000 59.07 Total : 59.07 50900 12/3/2002 001907 COSTCO#478 047817023328 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 107440-220-000-000 10.17 -------- -- -------- --- _ ._10=440=228=000=000_—�------ —; -- 5.00� 10-440-704-000-000 118.50 Total : 133.67 50901 12/3/2002 005529 PACIFIC BELL Nov. 2002 Phone serv. charges 10-190-235-000=000 1,68 10-440-235=000-000 16.04 Total : 17.72 50902 12/3/2002 007027_ TOYS R US J00043350 AFTER SHCOOL SUPPLIES 10-440-223-000-000 54.84 - - ---- ----_--- -, -- T----- ----�- -- --- --- -- - ----Total-: ---- -- _54.84----- 50903 12/4/2002 -004630 METLIFE (METROMATIC) 120102 METLIFE 10-022-63-00 219.00 Total: 219.00 ---50904T-1274/2002-006782— -STATE-COMPENSATION-IN[S.FUND 1-20102-- -WORKMANS COMP-` Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount' 50904 12/4/2002 006782 STATE COMPENSATION INS.FUND (Continued) 10-120A 43-000-000 417.90 10-125-143-000-000 78.20 10-140-143-000-000 121.86 10-172-143-000-000 50.15 10-175-143-000-000 40.12 10-180-143-000-000 741.11 10-370-143-000-000 131.66 10-380-143-000-000 23.51 10-440-143-000-000 1,706.57 -10-45071431-000-000 241.25 17-910-143-000-000 12.21 21-572-143-000-000 292.73 32-370-143-000-000 54.42 34-400-143-000=000 303.39 34-800-143-000-000 - 111.00 34-400-143-000-000 131.00 10-110-143-000-000 10.77 32-200-143-000-000 6.46 Total : 4,474.31 50905 12/4/2002 003420 'INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SVCS 120102 INLAND COUNTIES. - 10-022-63-00 895.02 Total : 895.02 50906 12/4/2002 004587 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 120102 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount . 50906 12/4/2002 004587 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK (Continued) 10-120-142-000-000 23.82 1'0-125-142-000-000 23.82 - 10-140-142-000-000 35.73 10_172=142-000-000____� 5.9-6_ _ ----- --- --- ------ 10-175-142-000-000 4.76 --- 10-180-142-000-000 35.74 10-370-142-000-000 16.68 10-380-142-000-000 11.91 10-450-142-000-000 11.91 ---- --------- - _�___ --_ . ---------- ---`------ ---------------r-221_572-142-Q00-0.00------- ------- ----- -_ —_-_11-.90--- 32-370-142-000-000 4.76 34-400-142-000-000 51.21 34-800-142-000-000 23.82- 10-440-142-000-000 - 285.84 Total : 547.86 50907 12/4/2002 006772 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY -120102 STANDARD INS- LIFE AND DISABILITY 10-120-142-000-000 13.00 10-125-142-000-000 13.00 10-140-142-000-000 19.50 10-172-142=000-000 3.26 -2:60-- -- 10-180-142-000-000 18.88 10-370-142-000-000 9.10 10-380-1427000-000 6.50 10-440-142-000-000 83.25 1-0=450=142=000=000 6.50 21-572-142-000-000 5.87 32-370-142-000-000 2:60 34-400-142-000-000 25.44 34-800-142-000-000 10.50 10-022-63-00 1,217.37 Total : 1,431.37 50908 - _ 12/4/2002- 005452 PACIFICARE-OF CALIFORNIA 120102 PACIFICARE HEALTH INS Page: � vchlist V''_, ;her List Page: 4 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50908 12/4/2002 005452 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) 10A 20-142-000-000 427.48 10-125-142-000-000 378.30 10-140-142-000-000 1,285.80 10-172-142-000-000 162.96 10-175-142-000-000 130.36 10-180-142-000-000 616.63 10-380-142-000-000 213.74 10-440-142-000-000 427.48 10-450-142-000-000 189.15 21-572-142-000-000 213.74 32-370-142-000-000 111.65 34-400-142-000-000 1,030.95 34-800-142-000-000 166.53 10-022-61-00 166.53 10-022-63-00 6,134.11 10-370-142-000-000 390.78 Total : 12,046.19 50909 12/12/2002 010019 5 POINT AUTO SERVICE 4313 91 dodge van-alternator/computer 10-440-272-000-000 1,280.00 4390 97 Toyota-Smoq/Cert E995717 34'800-272-000-000 38.20 Total : 1,318.20 50910 12/12/2002 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW Nov. 2002 Nov. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 50911 12/12/2002 001125 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS S2211852 STORAGE CONTAINER 10-440-704-000-000 2,225.00 10-440-704-000-000 172.44 Total : 2,397.44 50912 12/12/2002 010084 BIDNEY, ROBERT Nov. 2002 Nov. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date' Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50913 12/12/2002 001456 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 676212 Office supplies 10-370-210-000-000 59.49 Total 59.49 50914 12/12/2002 001713 CA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 162222 Oct. I-215 Frwy signal-maint/energy — _--"-_-16=51"0=238=000=000---- 200.45 T Total : 200.45 50915 12/12/2002 001685 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 112102 Work Comp Primary Deposit- 10-190-260-000-000 11,659.00 - 112102a Work Comp Excess Pool Dep. 12/02-6/2003 _-_ - ---� ---------- ---- . ----- ------- - ----- - . --- -------10=T90=260=000=000� -—, 447.00 Total : 12,106.00 50916 12/12/2002 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM Nov. 2002 Nov. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 50917 12/12/2002 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B465561 PUBLICATION OF PUBLIC NOTICES IN SUN 10-370-230-000-000 75.00 B467452 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10-,125-230-000-000 75.00 - - - - ---- ---=- -- ------ ---- - ---Total . -- -------150.00---- - 50918 12/12/2002 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 6958 PROCESS PARKING TICKETS 10-i40-255-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 �509T9 -"-12/12/2002-01-0055—EMPIRE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS 2002.21- COMMERCE WAY REDEVELOPMENT CONSULT - 32-370-250-000-000 2,760.00 Total : 2,760.00 50920 12/12/2002 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 32050478 Barton Rd. Beautif. supplies 10-450-710-000-000 475.34 32050508 Small tools 10-180-218-000-000 14.01 Page;-- 5- i vchlist V - .her:her List Page: 6 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY-OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50920 12/12/2002 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY (Continued) , 32050530 Hedqe Clippers &,Barton Beaut. supplies 10-450-710-000-000 7.62 10-450-701-000-000 370.37 32050598 Small'Tools 10-180-218-000-000 38.57 32060462 PARK MAINT AND SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 26.29 Total : 932.20 50921 12/12/2002 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3100 NEWSLETTER- - 10-125-213-000-000 620.75 Total : 620.75 50922 12/12/2002 010123 GILLETTE, ROGER 120730 FREEZER GASKET - 10-440-'246-000-000 79.04 10-440-246-000-000 5.62 Total : 84.66 50923 12/12/2002 002875 GOVT. FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 0033001 Annual Member Renewal 2003-Ronnow 10-140-265-000-000 155.00 Total : 155.00 50924 12/12/2002 003210 HOME DEPOT 587/6290204 Sr: Ctr roof repair supplies 10-805-245-000-000 8.56 - 623/2021487 SMALL TOOLS 10-180-218-000-000 30.75 644/8070804 HARWARE SUPPLY 10-180-245-000-000 57.69 Total : 97.00 50925 12/12/2002 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 2609466-00 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 233.44 Total : 233.44 50926 12/12/2002 010138 ICOM AMERICA, INC. 2878089 SW RADIO REPAIR-EOC 10-808-248-000-000 94.44 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50926 12/12/2002 010138 ICOM AMERICA, INC. (Continued) Total : 94.44 50927 12/12/2002 003850 JANWING OF COLTON 12020015 Dec. child care cleaninq 10-440-244-000-000 815.00 Total : 815.00 50928 12/12/2002 004620 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 9901077 Nov. phone usage/charqes 10-190-235-000-000 63.92 - 10-440-235-000-000 393.58 10-450-235-000-000 16.93 10-805-235-000-000 35.21 --- -- - - - - -- -- Total : 509.64 50929 12/12/2002 004898 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION/ 72870144602 2003 Member Renewal-AhSue 10-440-270-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 50930 12/12/2002 010041 NOLTE ASSOCIATES INC. 7302024 STORM DRAIN IMPOROVEMENTS 12-903-703-000-000 2,236.80 7302029 150-ACRE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 32-370-255-000-000 11,298.00 Total : 13,534.80 50931 12/1-2/2002 -005450 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SAu06425VC0 ANNUAL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 10-180-245-000-000 248.96 Total : 248.96 50932 12/12/2002 005586 PETTY CASH 120202 Petty cash reimbursement - -- - - - - �- --- ------ --- ------ ------ - 10-440-221-000-000 84.93 10-440-223-000-000 10.75 10-440-228-000-000 24.75 10-440-220-000-000 14.58 Total : 135.01 50933 12/12/2002 005673 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 14535435-001 Trencher/trailer rental 10-180-240-000-000 99.14 Total : 99.14 ---- — - - -- Page: 7 l vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice- Description/Account Amount 50934 12/12/2002 006285 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO 112502 1/2 irrigation meter-Barton Rd. Beaut. 10-450-710-000-000 2,700.00 Total : 2,700.00 50935 12/12/2002 006310 ROADRUNNER STORAGE - Dec. 2002 Dec. Storaqe Fee 10-140-241-000-000 63.00' Total : 63.00 50936 12/12/2002 006335 ROQUET PAVING INC. 1001-02 OVERLAY 20-200-715-000-000 '45,607.00 1005-02 PAVING-WORK 20-200-716-000-000 33,696.00 1103-02 STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT CANAL& MT. V _ 20-200-704-000-000 95,497.00 1103-3 STREET IMPROVE KI_NGSTON, ARLISS, ETON - 20-200-7-12-000-000 - 24,255.00- 1103-4 STREET IMPROVEMENTS-GT RD &VISTA GRAN 20-200-713-000-000 9,510.00 1202-02 STREET IMPROVE-WESTWOOD 20-200-711-000-000 . 24,620.00 Total :- 233,185M 50937 12/12/2002 005755 RWP FIBER FALL 40539 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-710-000-000 150.00 10450-710-000-000 11.63 Total : `161.63 50938 12/12/2002 006453 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER, 111802 2002-03 CAL-ID CONTRIBUTION 10-410-258-000=000 8,887.50 Total : 8,887.50 50939 12/12/2002 006524 S-.B:COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER 120402 Lien Release 276-213-45-0000 = 21-572-2107000-000 _12.00 Total : 12.00 50940 12/12/2002 006456 S.B. COUNTY CENTRAL MICROFILM 102502 Record of Survey-vellums 10-175-210-000-000 5.27 Page: 8 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount -50940 12/12/2002 006456 S.B. COUNTY CENTRAL MICROFILM (Continued) Total : 5.27 50941 12/12/2002 010143 SERRANO NURSERY 0799 Barton Rd. Beaut. plants 10450.710-000-000 242.44 - - = - - - - --Total': 242.44 50942 12/12/2002 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY Nov. 2002 Nov. Electricity 34-700-771-000-000 1.42 34-400=238-000-000 73.82 ' 10-175-238-000-000 26.84 10-172-238-000-000 33.55 t---- — ---- --- — - ----— - ------- -10=190=238=000=000-- --- 3;012.88-.. 16-510-238-000-000 547.05 10-450-238-000-000 11 591.40 34J00-775-000-000 7.69 10-440-238-000-000 646.33 15-500=601-000-000 19.39 Total : 5,960.37 50943 12/12/2002 006898 SYSCO_FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 2112016056 Child Care Food Supplies - 10440-220-000-000 481.58 211272621-7 Child Care Food Supplies -- ---- �_ ---- --- -- ---- �_— - -- - = - - - - --_10-4-40220-000-000=_ - 596.03- Total : 1,077.61 50944 , 12/12/2002 007102 T.Y.LIN INTERNATIONAL-MCDANIEL 0211046 BRIDGE 4.7-1,00-250-001-000 -11,660.88 11,660.88— 50945 12/12/2002 010091 TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS 233737-0 Nov. Phone usaqe/charqes 10-190-235-000-000 920.95 - Total : 920.95 50946 12/12/2002 007005 TOM & KATHY'S ANY HOUR 100423 Keys - 10-180-245-000-000 8.84 10-440-245-000-000 11.31 Total : 20.15 Page-9- - vchlist Vu"Uuher List Page: 10 12/04/2002 --5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 50947 12/12/2002 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 330 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES 10-37.07255-000-000 - 1,607.50 330a Oct. Consulting-RV issue 10-180-255-000-000 565.00 Total : 2,172.50 50948 12/12/2002 007402 U S POSTAL SERVICE 112702 POSTAGE METER 10-190-211-000-000 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 50949 12/12/2002 007586 VAVRINEK TRINE DAY&CO. 0006190-IN COMPILE QT INVESTMENT REPORTS 10-140-250-000-000 1,000.00 0006190-INa Prep Annual'Street Report 10-140-250-000-000 1,200.00 Total : 2,200.00 50950 12/12/2002 007880- WEST GROUP 6011983414 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES 10-125-250-000-000 133.61 Total : 133.61 50951 12112/2002 007905 WHITLEY, BRIAN Nov. 2002 Nov. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-0.00- 50.00 Total : 50.00 50952 12/12/2002 007920 WILLDAN 062-6175 Bldg &Safety Plan Check Services 10-400-03 1,494.76 062-6176 PLAN CHECK-SERVICES 10-370=255-000-000 410.00 062-6176a, Oct.,Engineering Plan Check Services 10-400-04 1.90.00 10-400-03 475.00 Total : 2,569.76 50953 12/12/2002 007925 WILSON, DOUG- Nov. 2002 Nov. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 Page: 1.0 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 12/04/2002 5:56:32PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 334,168.59 56 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 334,168.59 - - --- -------- ----- -------eer-tify- that, -to the best of-my knowledge, -the -afore=lis --tedchecks- for--pagment of City and Community Redev --elopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 11 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE _ COUMCEL AP�-����a�� CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING-NOVEMBER 13, 2002 A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 13, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Dan Buchanan,Mayor Lee Ann Garcia,Mayor Pro Tem Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Don Larkin, Councilmember Maryetta Ferr6, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Jerry Glander, Building& Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director Lt. Guerra, Sheriff's Department ABSENT: John Harper, City Attorney Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager The meeting was opened with invocation by Council Member Ferre, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Larkin. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Halloween Haunt Report Code Enforcement Officer Barrie Owens presented a slide show of the 2002 Halloween Haunt and thanked all of the sponsors. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2002-97 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA,CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following consent calendar items with the removal of Item 3H: 3A. Approval of Check Register Dated November 14, 2002 3B. Ratify 11-13-2002 CRA Action 3C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. � I i Council Minutes November 13,2002 Page 2 3D. Approval of 10-24-2002 Minutes 3E. Travel Authorization for City Clerk New Law and Election Seminar in Monterey, December 11-13th 3F. Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for Quarter ended September 30, 2002 3G. Vehicle Parking on Newport Avenue b ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3H. Conceptual Master Plan Design Services for Petta Park CC-2002-98 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to authorize the City Manager to execute a design services contract with Community Works Design Group for the preparation of a Conceptual Master Plan for Petta Park. I I i PUBLIC COMMENT -None ORAL REPORTS 5A. Committee Reports 1. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee a. ' Minutes of October 2, 2002 CC-2002-99 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA,,CARRIED 5-0,to accept the Historical&Cultural Activities Committee Minutes of October 2, 2002. 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes:of November 4, 2002 CC-2002-100 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA;CARRIED 5-0,to accept the Emergency Operations Committee Minutes of November 4, 2002. COUNCIL REPORTS ' II Mayor Buchanan, congratulated Herman Hilkey and Bea Cortes on their recent election to City Council and thanked the residents for participating in the election. i Mayor Pro Tem Garcia,congratulated Herman Hilkey and Bea Cortes on their recent election Council Minutes November 13,2002 Page-3 to the'City Council and indicated that she will miss Mayor Buchanan on the Council. She reported that there will be a free personal safety course presented bythe Sheriff s Department on December 5'h. She complimented staff on the recent Halloween Haunt. She encouraged everyone to attend the annual City Birthday Celebration on December 12th. j Councilmember Larkin,clarified that the personal safety course is,for anyone to attend. He felt that the events like the Halloween Haunt, Country Fair and the City Birthday party are what makes Grand Terrace special. He congratulated Herman Hilkey and Bea Cortes on their recent election to City Council. He expressed concern with the State Budget and potential cuts. He indicated that he will also miss Mayor Buchanan on the Council. Councilmember Ferre,congratulated Herman-Hilkey and Bea Cortes on their recent election to the City Council. She thanked staff for their efforts to beautify Grand Terrace. Councilmember Hilkey, thanked the residents for electing him to the City Council. He reported on activities of the San Bernardino Associated Governments(SANBAG)including, the proposed Maglev system and issues regarding the Southern California Association of Government's.(SCAG). PUBLIC HEARING 6A. Bicycle Transportation Plan/Resolution in Support of a Grant Application for a "Priority-One"Bike Lane Route CC-2002-101 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBERLARKIN,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRE, CARRIED 5-0, to continue the public hearing for the Updated Bicycle Transportation Plan to December 12, 2002; and adopt a resolution in support of a grant application for the "Priority One"Bike Lane Route. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None r NEW BUSINESS 8A. California JPIA Workers' Compensation Program CC-2002-102 MOTION BY MAYORTRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,CARRIED 5-0,to adopt a resolution that declares the City is self-insuring and participating in the California JPIA Workers'Compensation Program;and adopt a resolution including City volunteer workers in the Workers' Compensation Program. 8B. Legislative Update f 'Council Minutes November 13,2002 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tem,Garcia,reported,that the League of California Cities Inland Empire Division Legislative Tasks Force met' on October 24, 2002. The Task Force is anticipating the possibility of a especial session to be called. Each city is requested to develop an impact handout to accompany the Cali to Action 2003 Program packet for their area presentations. She reported that there will be a Legislative Orientation for new arid continuing Council Members on December,4, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. CLOSED SESSION None ORDER 01 ADJOURNMENT , Mayor Buchanan adj oumed the City Council Meeting at 7:15 p.m,,,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled:to_be held)on Thursday,December 12, 2002 at 7:30 p.m., CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace I I i MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace I i I I � I I I 1 ! d I a 'V CRA ITEM ( X ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2002 FUNDING REQUIRED: ( X NO FUNDING REQUIRED SUBJECT: Authorization To Go To Bid — Rollins Park Renovation Project RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Clerk to publish bid documents Background: In May 2002, the Redevelopment Agency approved a design services contract with Community Works Design Group for the preparation of construction documents for the renovation of Rollins Park and the playfields of Terrace Hills Middle School. The project includes the redevelopment of the park to serve as a soccer facility with upgrades to the parking lot, playgrounds, lighting, and restroom/concession facilities. Funding will be provided for this project through the Redevelopment Agency/School District agreement directing designated school tax increment funds for use in this project. Additional funds are available through 2000 State Parks Bond funds and a State Parks Department Land and Water Conservation Fund grant. All construction bid plans and documents have been completed and are ready for public bidding. Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board authorize the City Clerk to publish the bid documents according to City policy and procedures. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3G 'i Cf T Y OF GRAND TERRF,CL CITY OF _GRAND TERRACE N 0 V 2002 CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE Regular Meeting CITY CLERK ,MINUTES October 14, 2002 The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular monthly meeting at the Senior Center, Grand Terrace, California at 1$00 hours. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Philomene Spisak, JoAnn Johnson, Vice Chairperson, Dottie Raborn, Claire McElwee, Lewis Neeb and Richard Rollins. MEMBERS ABSENT: None CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT None GUEST PRESENT: Bob Stewart, Citizen Patrol, Don Bennet, Citizen AGENDA: The agenda for the meeting approved by motion from Claire McElwee and seconded by JoAnn Johnson MINUTES: The minutes of the meeting of September 9, 2002 were distributed to the members present for their approval. Dottie Raborn made the motion to accept as written with Claire McElwee making the second. The motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT: Mr Don Bennet related his experience of being robbed at gunpoint on or about September 4'h this year at approximately 0900 hours in Pico Park while walking his dog. He related that a male individual approached him and demanded his wallet and at the same time displaying a handgun secured in his waistband. The individual gave warning about reporting this action as he had"accomplices"outside the park boundaries that would "take care of him". The assailant took the victim's wallet and went to a bank in San Bernardino and used the victim's ATM card to secure approximately$400.00 in cash. Mr Bennet immediately advised the Sheriffs Department and reported the ATM transaction to his bank and notified the loss of his credit cards. There has been no resulting action as of this date as to any apprehension of the individual. CORRESPONDENCE: There was no written correspondence to the Committee for this meeting. BUDGET: Dottie Raborn reported that $92.70 had been spent for uniform expenses at the Greenwood Uniform Supply store for the Citizen Patrol. C COU-MCIL AGENDA ITEM NO� � I UNFINISHED BUSINESS: j In'view of the fact that the,committee is stffli short memberships Mr Bennet was urged to apply,for membership. I NEW BUSINESS: Lewis Neeb brought a plot-plan layout of the Mobile Home Park.on Newport Avenue in order to outline the fact'that there wasn't more j children area there and that parking in the parksite had become!very I difficult. There being no further business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 1915 hours. Respectfully submitted a RICHARD ROLLINS ? 1 Recording Secretary _ i 1 1 I I ., i I ! , Cif`OF GRAND TERRACE N 0 V : 2002 Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Minutes for November 4,2002 CITY CLERK The Meeting was called to order-at 7:10 PM by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present,were Pauline, Hannah Laister, Colleen Edmundson, Shelly Rosenkild,Brenda Stanfill, Frances Carter, Ann Petta and Barbara Tinsley.. Secretary's Minutes:The minutes were read and approved on motion by Ann,seconded by Colleen,all in favor. �- Treasurer's Report: The Balance in Budget$964.88,Petty Cash$310,Pauline and Shelly turned in bills for the Fair. There was,-also a contribution from Rosemary Horner who will be.sent a Thank you by the secretary. It was noted,that not as much was made on food sales,face painting or raffle as in other years. Historical Report: Ann reported that the box of old newspapers did come from the Carharts. Country Fair: Thank.you notes will be sent to Gary Gerhart; Wilson Thompson; Lynn Smith, Joanne Carlstrom, Wilma Henning and Sally Luther for all their efforts. Poster were gone over and will be changed next year so Lions does not stand out so prominently. We did have a couple of scarecrows. Barbara thinks this is a good idea and will try again next year. Judges were as listed in last months minutes and all showed up. Ann reported there were 35 participants and all were happy with their sales. Children's face painting should start earlier. Shelly will make up some guidelines for the cooking contest so that she can be freed up earlier. Shelly suggested getting soccer teams to make �1 items for a fund raiser. Brenda will send thanks to participants. Glass Display Case: Colleen and Hannah are working on this and will be ready by December 1. It is,a presentation of the accomplishments of the Woman's Club over the years. New Business: Anniversary Potluck December 12:The Program was discussed,Tony Petta will-be MC,Mayor will make a short speech,a member of the Woman's Club will make the presentation of the Show Case. Decorations will be silver, white and red. We will have to start decorating at 3:30 to get done on time. Colleen and Hannah will get supplies. Barbara will make punch with two bowls to-start. Frances will provide two warming trays, Shelly one. Colleen has,large silver tray she will donate to the Committee Phyliss Forbes will be asked to cook Turkey, Ann will,cook a ham and provide bread. Colleen will provide ice and water. Further discussion at the next meeting. .The meeting-was adjourned at 8:30. The next meeting will be December 9, 2002. Respectfully submitted Hannah Laister Secretary COUNCIL AGENDA,ITEPUI NCMO2f4 C;!J'1Uh-un lelJ j;u J_ CITY OF GRAND TERRACE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Regular Meeting MINUTES (NOTES) December 2,2002 The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations,Committee was not able to hold an official meeting due to the lack of members and a quorum.. However,the two members and prospective members Wayne Youngman and Dottie Raborn met at the regular time and place. Discussion continued.to center around goals_ and needs of the City and of the Committee with an added focus on upcoming training of city staff. MEMBERS PRESENT were Vic Pfennighausen and JoAnn Johnson. MEMBERS ABSENT—Richard Haubert CITY STAFF—Assistant City Manager, Steve Berry and Management Information Systems Specialist,Dragos Barbu. GUESTS PRESENT—Prospective member Wayne Youngman and Dottie Rabom. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of November 4,2002 was not given, due to lack of quorum. However, notes are to be sent to the council for information purposes. LIAISON REPORT 1 a. A public Works information briefing on flood prevention/control will be held on December 12 from 2 to 4 pin. Location may be obtained from Steve. EOC SET-UP TRAINING—Presented mostly by Vic Pfennighausen. a. Vic informed us about the exercise primarily for hospitals that was conducted on November 14th. The exercise went well and Grand Terrace was able to participate via radio. b. Vic distributed printed material on SEMS (Standardized Emergency Management System). c. Office in a Box's are stored in end of storage area in large community room near phone jacks. I d. Procedure for two or three meetings early in 2003 was discussed at length. e. City staff will be included in the training sessions, as well as council. f. Set up procedure will be demonstrated at least twice,then a full table top exercise. g. There was much discussion on just what the city would be responsible for in the event of a major disaster. h. However, a basic emergency plan is required to meet state requirements. i. An informative video was shown, also on SEMS. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT a. Equipment is generally in good condition,but a radiator coolant overflow tank is needed for the diesel generator. b. An ICOM receiver was repaired for a cost of$94.25. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N®e�)�6� i i I I c. Ordered a radio for the Fire Department as promised. P.O. was drawn. F.D. and city I frequencies will be programmed. i ; OLD BUSINESS-None NEW BUSINESS j a. Will need to budget for a computer and fax machine next year for use in conjunction with the Boxes and.set up. Possibly a fax will be available from the city that is not used now. I MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS-Steve indicated that there had been much graffiti at { Pico Park and hoped that',the Citizen Patrol would be able to keep an eye on the situation. It will be mentioned and a note will be left in the Citizen Patrol vehicle. j ADJOURNMENT AT 6':55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, I /� JoAnn son, Secretary NEXT.MEETING WILL BE JANUARY 6,2003 6 p.m. ' ' I 1 ail i I o FROND TERR c Community,and Economic Development Department STAFFf-REPORT CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: ' .December 12, 2002 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SUBJECT: 1) Public Hearing on the Updated Bicycle Transportation Plan:(GPA-02-01and E-02-12) 2) Resolution Approving the Updated-Bicycle Transportation Plan RECOMMENDATION: Open the , Public Hearing on the Updated Bicycle Transportation Plan ,GPA-02-01 and E-02-12; Receive any testimony;Close the Public Hearing;Approve the Updated Bicycle Transportation Plan, together with a Negative Declaration, by Resolution. Background: In 1997, the State Legislature passed "AB 1020" to "establish a bicycle transportation system and to provide funding.for its implementation. In order to be eligible for these funds through appropriate grant applications, each jurisdiction is required to approve a regionally consistent Bicycle Transportation Plan ("BTP,'). In early 1999 the City,Council approved the original"BTP." Since that time, a new regional bikeway plan has been prepared and,adopted by the San-Bernardino Association of Governments ("SANBAG"). In addition, new conditions have arisen in the community which would,warrant the updating and revising of the original "BTP". Earlier this year, it was recognized on the part of staff and the City's transportation/traffic consultants that'if the City were to be successful in future grant applications, it would be necessary to revise and update the adopted "BTP." This required revising the "BTP" to include a new list of proposed bikeway projects with a new"priority rating." Mr. Harry Persaud .of the firm of "Transportation, Engineering and Planning", the City's transportation consultants, has prepared the updated/revised "BTP.". 'The,updated Plan includes the new list of proposed bikeway,projects with a "priority rating." Mr. Persaud will be present at the public�hearing to respond to any questions that might arise. Mr. Persaud has also prepared the required resolution for the City Council's approval of the updated and revised Bicycle Transportation Plan. 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • 909) 824-6621, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO® .J i f I I I ! ! 1 1 The updated Bicycle}Transportation Plan has received approval from SANBAG as being j consistent with the regional bikeway plan recently adopted by SANBAG. The Resolution I of Approval calls forthe adoption of both the SANBAG Regional Bicycle Plan and the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan as the authorized Bicycle Transportation Plan for the City of { Grand Terrace. A copy of the San'Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan I (Regional Bicycle Plan) has been 'attached to this report for the Council's information and review. j The updated Bicycle,Transportatio'n Plan qualifies for a Negative Declaration under Section 15371 of the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act ;(CEQA) in that there is no substantial evidence that there will be any adverse impact to the environment in the approval of the updated Plan. i This matter was continued from the meeting of November 13, 2002 to December 12 2002 because of the rescheduling of the November 14th meeting. Also, at the November 13th meeting, the City Council approved a resolution which authorized staff to submit an application to fund the "Priority One" route as described in.the Plan. The application was prepared by Staff and'-has been submitted to CALTRANS for review�thereby meeting the j early December deadline. Recommendation: I I I Staff has reviewed the;updated Bicycle Transportation Plan as prepared by the consultant; is pleased with its contents; and recommends its approval. j { I Respectfully submitted, Approved ,by: I 1 Jo Lampe Gary L. oontz Ass'Qbiate Planner Community Development Director JLJI 1 j Exhibits: Exhibit 1': Update/Revised Bicycle Transportation Plan Exhibit 2: Resolution Approving the Updated BTP I Exhibit 3: Propos!ed Negative Declaration and Initial Study Exhibit 4: San Bernardino County's Regional Bicycle Plan c:WlyFiles\JOHN\bicycleplans\coiuncil.rpt i I i , er.anrmnti7•SO 740 IBM WIN 1 RISC pp, � I • � I • I � w L* b.��� t �"�'' 'Jr �'+.6 x t�.^r'�<.'..•a.y � t+' ��L.'a4�C�rj'"� �_ iu 3t���,s� •fir;�^'t - . "'?-"4! �i_-c}�„a'- • City Of Grand Terrace Bicycle Transportation Plan Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction.................................................................. 1 2. Estimated number of Existing &Future bike Commuters ............. 1 3. Existing and proposed Land Used .......................................... 2 4. Activity Centers ............................................................... 2 5. Existing and Proposed Bikeways Facilities................................ 3 6. Existing and Proposed Bikeway Parking ................................... 3 7. Proposed bike transport Facilities 8. Facilities for bike storage ...................................................... 4 9. Bike Safety&Education ....................................................... 4 10.Citizen/Community Participation ..........................:............... 5 11. Coordination of Plan/Regional Transportation Plan........................5 12.Proposed Project/Priorities .................................................... 5 13.Bicycle Expenditure ............................................................ 7 14.Conclusion ........................................................................ 7 i I i ATTACHMENTS I I , I. Street&Highway Code Section 891.2 II. City General Plan-Land Use Map i III. City Land Use Statistic i IV. City Activity Centers I V. City Bieycle-way System k j VI. City Regional Bike-way Plan VII. Proposed Staging areas VIII. Bicycle Laws IX. Bicycle Riding Tips . 1 X. Letter of Consistency I i I XI. City Council Resolution adopting Plan I I i I !i I I I CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Estimated numbers of existing and BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION future bicycle commuters in the Plan PLAN Area. Introduction The City of Grand Terrace recognizes Currently, there are a,limited number of that a safe and effective bikeway, work related commuter trips, which network enhances the quality of life for utilize the City s designated bicycle residents and visitors to the City. This routes. This is due to the fact that only a Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) is a few of the routes are completed or Comprehensive Strategic Plan that will provide for connectivity to regional bike create the foundation for a bicycle routes. If gaps in the routes are friendly environment to serve commuter completed, .it is expected that bicycle and recreational riders in the City and � commuter trips will significantly p increase because these routes provide provide residents with local bicycle excellent access to activity centers in the connectivity to the surrounding communities and with the Regional City of. Grand Terrace and adjacent Bicycle Network. areas. The most recent.estimate of daily bicycle trips is 300 trips per day. It is This BTP also serves as a policy estimated that as, missing gaps in the The BTP document to guide the development and bikeway; system are completed that is the maintenance of other programs for the commuting trips will increase to over cit 's 700 trips per day. blueprint City such as planning, community for involvement, utilization of existing bicycle resources, facility design, multi-modal Students`cycling to and from school-sites planning integration, safety and education, make up the largest percentage of bicycle commuters. There are three consiswith TA tent support facilities as well as specific program implementation, maintenance public schools in thel City,,that are part guidelines of the Colton Joint Unified School and funding. District.' These include two elementary The BTP is consistent with the schools and one middle school.- The guidelines-of the Bicycle Transportation principal from each school was contacted to find out the number of Account (BTA) as established in the Street and Highway Code Section 891.2 students who currently bike to school. ( Currently there are 75 students using a-k) Attachment I. The BTP complies their bicycles the with the eligibility requirements of the as. , primary Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), transportation to schools in the City. It is which are C the most stringent estimated that this number would increase by more than 80%, when requirements of the available funding existing gaps in the network are programs. The BTA is administered,by completed. Caltrans, and for Fiscal Year'200.1/2002, ' approximately $7.2 million is allocated r for bikeways projects statewide. The magnitude of these funds has made the BTA an attractive funding source that can help the City fund implementation of its Bicycle Transportation Plan. } 1 Existing and Prouosed Land Use and Activity Centers in the Cily of Grand Settlement Patterns Terrace: The City of Grand Terrace is a small city 1. The Barton Road Specific Plan in the east San Bernardino Valley. It has Area consisting of existing and proposed an area of .approximately 3.61 square retail and office commercial. i miles with a current, population of 2. The proposed Outdoor approximately 11,600 people. f It is a Recreational Sales Center along the bedroom - community, where extension of Commerce Way. approximately 4,000 people commute to 3. The industrial ea adjacent to the work on a daily basis. i 17215 in the southwest corner of the j City. ! i The City of Grand Terrace-General Plan ' 4. The existing Civic Center guides the pattern•of development within consisting of the city hall and public the City. Attachment II, the General library. 1 Plan land use map, shows the City's 5. The existing elementary school,' -existing and' future land uses and. Terrace View Elementary, on Grand settlement pattern's.. Generally, Terrace Rd. i. , employment centers and i., other 6. The existing elementary school; Aec"''cy non-residential uses are located :along Grand Terrace Elementary, at Barton centers the I-215 Corridor and the 'western Road and Vivienda Ave. be� portion of Barton, Road. The- major 7. Terrace Hill intermediate school, Se ed b ' bicycle employment area' within the City is Mt. Vernon Avenue/De Berry commuter mostly undeveloped. This area is located Street. 1'--", west of Michigan,;north of Main'St., and S. Commercial/office area near the southeast of I-215 As indicated on intersection of Barton Rd. and Palm Attachment III, residential land uses in Ave. F the City are nearly built out with the 9. Industrial area adjacent to La exception of infill lots and acreage"in the Cadena, west . of the 1-215, off of foothills in the southeast area. However, Vivienda Ave. the majority of nonresidential land uses 10. Commercial area along Barton' remain to be developed. i Road west;of the"1-215. t I The City has several activity centers that Activity centers �utside the City of attract commuter bicyclists. These are Grand Terrace: shown on-Attachment IV. The 'activity 1 centers shown on this figure are located 4. "The Courtyard" Shopping Center both within the. City of Grand Terrace, , in' the City of Colton at the intersection 1 and outside the City limits. ! These of Mt. Vernon and Washington Street. activity centers are: listed below. The 2. "The Centerpointe" Shopping numbered activity center corresponds to Center in the City 'of Colton on Mt: its location identified on Attachment IV. Vernon Avie just north of the 1-215. 3. Park and. Ride facility on. Fairway. 2 1 4. San Bernardino Valley College in , location of 'the existing bikeways that the City_ of San Bernardino 'near the have been constructed and provides intersection of Mt. Vernon Ave. and IMi11 connectivity among the various activity St. centers identified'previously. 5. Loma Linda University, L"orria Linda University Hospital and - Jerry There are two categories of Pettis Veterans' Memorial Hospital in proposed bikeway facilities planned for the City of Loma Linda.' the City. First is construction of `gaps_ '6. Proposed`North-South Corridor closures' on " the existing Plan and connecting •'Mt. Vernon " Ave. with secondly are new future facilities that Pigeon ,,-Pass Road and the" City of will serve planned non-residential uses Moreno'Valley. located"west of Michigan Avenue along 7. Proposed Business/Research Park the.1-215 corridor. at Columbia and Michigan'in the'City of Riverside. Existing and proposed bicycle narking 8. Various activity centers in the facilities City of Riverside including the City has University-of California at Riverside and In January 1994; the City adopted 3.2 miles large industrial/commercial centers in Ordinance # 147,, "implementing of improved the northern City of Riverside. transportation control measures (TCM s) bikeways. 9. Stater' Bros. and other to reduce air pollutant emissions. The city is employment centers' in the City of ordinance' enacted"-design, standards for committed Colton at the west end of Barton Road.' new "nonresidential and- multifamily to working - with 10. Existing commercial 'and developments to install bicycle racks and community employment centers in the City of other ancillary facilities. leaders to Coltori and Colton Civic Center .. Bicycle parking facilities are located locating future at the various activity centers" that ancillary Existing and Prouosed Bikeways include schools, shopping centers, public parking buildings, \and employment centers facilities A comprehensive and complete identified �earlier in 'this- report. The bicycle network will greatly benefit locations of these facilities are showmon residents and visitors to the City. The Attachment IV. As indicated previously, City supports bicycle transportation as a most of the City's employment centers viable commute alternative as well as-an are only partially developed at this time. enjoyable recreational activity. As the As development occurs, the-City will plan is implemented over the next continue to require bicycle parking and several years, bikeways and improved ancillary facilities in accordance" with bicycle facilities will make a positive Ordinance.# 141. contribution to the City's goal of- a balanced transportation system. The City .: of Grand Terrace has approximately 3.2 miles of improved' Class, H-bikeways. The existing bikeways are located in the developed-portion of the City on Barton J Road and Mount Vernon. Attachment V, The Existing Bikeway System, shows Proposed . bicycle transport and The. City of Grand Terrace 'plans to parking facilities Icontinue to work with the Riverside County ' Transportation Commission The'City is served 'directly by Riverside (ROTC) and SANBAG to develop. a j Transit Authority_I (RTA). 6rrently, Metrolink station in I Highgrove. The j there is one-bus route (Route 25) that proposed site • is located - in' services the,Cit . RTA also s onsors the unincorporated Riverside County, south'' Y P 1P � , "Bikes on-Bus Program". This is-a free of the City of Grand Terrace. Several of program that provides racks on buses for the existing and proposed bike routes the transportation !of bicycles.; These that are , identified in this -plan will racks have been installed on every bus provide direct access to the proposed and each rack .,has spaces- for two Highgrove; station. These include bicycles. RTA s Ride Guide contains a proposed bike lanesf on Main Street; ' detailed explanation of bus bike rack Commerce Way, and.on the Gage Canal.; basics and, how tol .use the racks. The City continues to, work with RTA and Existing and proposed facilities for Omnitrans, San Bernardino County's.- changing and bicycle ag store. I , I � The City. provider;% to expand its services to the f BTP is City. The City is also committed to work While there.are no `official' facilities for integated I i t wish the. with=the business community .to iexplore cyclists to change and/or store clothing SANBA all feasibility - opportunities., to add and equipment. The-I Civic Center and Regional � ancillary parking facilities as new transit the local schools are) defacto sites that Bicycle stops,and businesses are;developed. could be ] candidate 1' sites -for future Plan 1 facilities. ,However consistent with its In addition to bus, and private vp hicles; policy the City continues to work with commuters in Grarid.Terrace have access the representatives of the business and to commuter rail via Metrolink. • employment sector �to provide these Metrolink services as new developments • ,are and Los Angeles counties The, constructed. Metrolink station'! in the• City of Riverside is the most direct-connection Bike Safety and Education' Program to the City of Grand Terrace via RTA 1 - Route 25j;and is about seven miles from The 'San ;Bernardino County Sheriffs central Grand Terrace.. The .Riverside- Department, (SBCSD) Office of Metrolink station. isnear the intersection � 'Community Services, has developed a of University Avenue and S R - 91. thorough bicycle safety and education Bicycle racks are installed at. the program targeted for public schools. In Riverside Metrolink)station. the City of Grand Terrace,� a Sheriffs Department Community Services Another Metrolink jstation is located in Officer visits each school site.'at least - { the City of San.Bernardino. It is closer once a month. At� these meetings, the to central Grand Terrace by Community Services Officer regularly approximately 1.5 miles, however, there distributes, information on bike safety is no direct transit', connection to this and discusses this I topic with the station. I students. J In addition, during vacation periods., the Community Services Officer 4.. holds at least four bike safety rodeos per Coordination of the Plan with year. Regional Plans The City's General Plan Circulation The San Bernardino Association of Element calls for City staff to work with Government Regional Bikeway Plan was' the School District to develop a recently completed (Attachment VI). "Suggested Routes to School Plan" for The Plan shows four existing or each school site. The purpose this plan proposed routes traversing the city and is to identify pedestrian routes to the connected to the City's Bikeway routes. school sites that minimize conflicts with The first route is an-existing east-west motorized traffic and other street route 'along Barton Road through the hazards. . City with connections to bike routes in Colton, Loma Linda and Redlands. This Citizen/Community participation in bikeway also provides ,connectivity to Plan Development the Santa Ana River Regional Bike Trail that links other regional trails from the City staff solicited input to the Plan'from Inland Empire to the Coastal Cities.-The city has citizens through the Plan's public SANBAG Bike Plan , also shows an identified hearing process at the City Council existing bike trail along Mt. Vernon sixriority hearing. A bikeway plan is included in Avenue connecting to regional trails category the City's General Plan, even though this along Barton Road. Another regional of bicycle is not required by California General' trail forms a north-south connection in facilities Plan laws. The plan was also subject to the City along La Cadena Drive. In public review when .it was initially addition a fourth route is planned adopted. immediately adjacent to the western City limits that will connect to the City of The City of Grand Terrace also works Colton. with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) to Proposed Proiects and Priority for improve air quality in this air basin. This Implementation. Bikeway Plan is one strategy being,used by the City to help improve air quality in City has identified list of bicycle projects the City The District adopted the current grouped into six priority categories Air Quality.Management Plan (AQMP). (Attachment 5) as following: in 1997. Included in 'the AQMP is a chapter on Transportation' Strategy and PRIORITY ONE: Transportation Improvements. Within this chapter is a section, on 1) Construct bike lanes on both Transit/System Management. This sides of Barton Road from section cites bicycle and pedestrian Mt.Vemon Avenue to facilities as a method to improve air MichiganAvenue as a Class quality. Implementation of the City of H Facility. -Grand Terrace's Bikeway Plan will help the District reach its goals for cleaner 2) Construct bike lanes on air. westerly side of Michigan Avenue, southland from 5 Barton Road to Main Street as missing links with Colton a Class II Facility. and City of Riverside bike lanes as a Class 11 facility. 2) Construct bike lanes on both 3) Construct bike lanes on both sides of Canal Street from sides of Canal Street from Mt. Vernon Avenue Barton Road to Newport to Newport Avenue as a Avenue as a Class II Facility. Class II Facility. 4) Construct bike lanes on both PRIORITY FOUR: sides of Newport Avenue from Canal Street to Grand 1) Construct bike lanes on both Terrace Road as a Class II side of Commerce Way j Facility. from Michigan Avenue to westerly terminus and both PRIORITY TWO: sides of future extension of CommerceWay City will 1) Construct bike lanes on both to Main Street as a Class II seek local, sides of Grand Terrace Road Facility. reg'ional,l from Newport Avenue to State andother Barton Road as a Class II funds for Facility. ; PRIORITY FIVE: the',se projects. 2) Construct bike lanes on both 1) Construct bike lanes on sides of Barton Road from both side' of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace Road to the Road from Mt. Vernon Union Pacific Railroad Avenue to Barton Road as a Bridge as a Class II Facility. Class II Facility. 3) Construct bike lanes on both PRIORITYSIX: sides of La Cadena Drive from Palm Avenue to Litton 1) Construct a bike lane along Avenue within the City of gage Canal from Barton Grand-Terrace as a Class II Road to the southern City Facility. limits as a Class 11 Facility. PRIORITY THREE: i 1) Construct bike lanes on west side of Mt. Vernon Ave from Barton Road to the Northern City limits to complete 6 and regional needs. The Plan Bicycle Expenditure integrates local bike routes with The City has secured_and expended a significant amount of funds for SANBAG regional bicycle Plan to bikeway improvements on Barton provide,a comprehensive road, Mt Vernon Avenue and Main network for residents Street. It is estimated that within"the - of the City and neighboring areas. last several years these expenditure have exceeded $600,000. The funding,sources for this expenditure include City funds, State Article 3 Program, AB 2766, State Safe Route to Schools Program and developer contributions. In addition the City has plans for a number of city bicycle rest areas along major bike Bicycle routes throughout the City. City has Plan is consistent recently'completed-construction of with bike rest areas at zMt Vernon SANBAG Avenue @ main Street and Mt Regional Vernon Avenue @ De Berry Street. Bike Plan City continues to work with the development community to implement additional bike lanes, bike rest stops and other bike amenities. - Conclusion The City's-Bikeway'Transportation Plan is updated to be consistent with SANBAG regional Bikeway Plan and with the. guidelines established by the Street' and Highway Codes Section 891.2. the City of Grand Terrace recognizes that the provision of bike routes and facilities for its citizen are an integral component'of the.quality of ' life of its residents. To this,end the City has reevaluated its current bicycle plan and develop a new priority list of existing and proposed bicycle projects that are more responsive to the community 7 . i I l ATTACHMENT I i STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 891.2 ! I 891.2. A city or county may prepare a bicycle transportation plan, which shall include, but not be limited to; the following elements: a (a) The estimated,number of existing bicycle commuters in the plan area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters.resulting from,implementation of the plan. b A ma and description o exisiin and proposed land use and settlement patterns O P P f g P P. , which shall include,!but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings, and major employment centers. (c)A map and descrl ption of existing and proposed bikeways. (d)A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bicycle parking facilities. These shall include, 'but not be limited to,parking at schools, shopping centers,public buildings, and major, employment�centers. (e)A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These shall include, but not.be limited r to,parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals,ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisionsffor transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels. - (f)A map and description of existing and proposed facilities'for changing and storing clothes and equipment. These shall include, but not be limited to, locker, restroom, and shower facilities near bicycle parking facilities. (g)A description of bicycle safety;and education programs conducted i the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement 1 -responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code pertaining to bicycle t operation, and the resulting effect!on accidents involving bicyclists. (h)A description of the extent of citizen and community involvement in,developmentof the plan, including,.but not limitedd to, letters of support. (i)A description of how the bicycle transportation plan-has been coordinated and is consistent with other local or regional transportation,,air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to,programs that provide incentives for bicycle commuting. (j)A description of the,projects proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for ; implementation. f I (k)A description of past expenditures for bicycle facilities and future financial needs for projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters in the plan area. l 1 _.,,� I■ �Illlllllo������� �" I I,d I IPI. �:uuunuun u►� � �•■:r , r ► r �� .II��IIII II lill II;1i) .,IIII ;;■:. � r•.;, . .,11, �L�.�.,►I� 1 I II �Ilu■■■■■■■ ♦ J ♦� 1011 ► IIIII: II�� •II' '•� ( I/.III�������I =�=:.� . ��i;.;. ;:1� � , -;,►„dl,,, lur Ilol II (hill fill llllll :::::�•= I":�.�r�✓ •l� %_..��o�,I'llll,ii 1►1►1,.,�ii� I I ,.,,.I��Ililllllllllllilllllllllllll :':-�• :�:�--. ••.�;.♦♦�:�► � 11 •� \ i INLIIIU (III (.) +, .:. . . .�� . . . .. .■ ► �� gnnlll ^••...III Ill!I I I .� I �� •low, 111111111 .111': r i I I. ., �• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :�• �, ��,�.�'����• �� �HqI,1�� ' �► !IIIII'" • _.. IIIII 1 'pl;lll� �.::�.'�•:�I���.'U����o���fa>• II�lilI1lU1l1lu1l1i�w111„1i!dII�IlIlI1�)1 1�►� �i.. II,°�;IuIIIuIIIngII IuIIIaI'l..lil h,.(IrdII II n m 'II1IrII1Il I1.I11I1I I';=III 4 -p�_.:_�__�►_=II♦�%I��I�Qe���om•����•��•��i••►•��.�.�����.O�♦p��•♦`�I���b� ► _�_����•:�iC e �n.1n:1u:1uI►►�r�1�/111�■�■�♦►�—�-T►S,����/•�P►4 MOIR � � . bi■Ill.�ll.r \\liu. 1111■a•• I :■■■■ .■11■oi■■ ZOO W-mm \r MINNIE III 1ol.t�,��,�-�� ■.1 r' •II I.��•.a.�•�.:;�Illlllr� ,/`�1111►1�1�1►1�II 7IL•I�a.■iii il\l�C II III IIIII IanI nnu.u.ndun uul-ln!lr!w- in••�1�• ■p1Iu1I1Ir1�•1.... .......IIII uuuum Ill nn ��►�i�, . �I�11 \ ■■' 1=IIIII■■■■■IC IIIIIIII ■wnu■■■■.UIIIO �//```I����� r���:�■■■..,_ I ■■■■■■■■■■■a■..unt• �iiiiiiiiiiii7 .''' ` �� �1■■■..II\� I Illl.11ll liil E,t■■■■■.■■a■�■■■■■a (IIIIIIIIIIII /'` � �■■■■■■■■■■V IIIII E,■■■■■r1■■a[�■■■r � IIIIIIIIIIII \►� uuw-- .1 ■aa . (III snnnnnnuun°t unuuttrr: u■►�C: a unnuuu nunuuunu■� ♦ ������������ 1`.11,.� 1111111:��■1 �r�:IIIIIIIIIIII1111 s■■■■■■■n■u■:■u■■■■■u■ ■■r IN��I��IIIII IIIIIIIIIIII �',� - IL11■-ttt■�uu■r� ■IIIII: ■ Ill�u��uu����::unu■■,■,n �iii7i�►iii:I��:::iii%ri! • • • ��� � C■ri-lr�/��� : �■ �tl�tt����r� ►IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIiii. �I I %/�:�:-I:vi-.�.•u■nant• p uununm■uunnuv. ►iiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiii�i i . i I. ��■nnt•�- a.:Q\�A�I■ i Illlllrnun■Imn■■■u.. riiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiii �_..■-_II ::. ► �\ � � � /((IIIII IIIIIIIIIIII/ r�:ua♦��I■11111111111 S� ..■_ .■1■.■.■..■..tl,lt..� •._ riiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiii � • 1 • �I : � I�� tltl►J snuuunnut■u,l:: iiiiiiii��yyiiiiiiiiiii r� 11 11'�-- _ IIIIt1 r11I.:•.��1�������� ; ■■at__ IIIIIIII!`IIIIIIIIIIfI (IIIIIIIII � �._==== .n ■- /_`:uuutu„■ ...■uuu■t ii.>Iil�iiiiiiiiiiiiill 12►./--:C- ut•�:: �1:::uuuuttt' ��::.muu iiiil!'iiii...._.....ia • . ,u►\-n -I O :■uuuuu• 1■...u■,u,■" •IIIII€iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii nnnur !I �'/// 1/I►��I umuuuu■` nuu y:a: IIIIIO��=� ;•�iuiiiiiiiii uu■n iiliii�-•••i<t�Iiii�ii ' IIIIIIIq= .■■■■■r viiiiiiiii7ii..:>r•.itG ' - ■uuu■■npp■np■ �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii� • i Illlr: p uutn�=IN,- i■uutuutulm tun uuuu.� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii w . . . • 11���/'i� ,'� ��\ mna.��:uuuu�%uuu mn� �nwu.u.u■■nn u■■■■■u. r�rrrr�.�•�rrrr�r�rr��r� 1 1 1 I I ' I I I ATTACHMENT III LAND USE STATISTICS - CITY OF GRAND TERRACE I Build Out Plan Existing. To be Built Use Trip Generation Land Uses Land Uses Land Uses Parameter Residential Low ! Dwelling Units 3310 3121 189 Medium i Dwelling Units 1855 1586 269 General Commercial- TSF-GLA 1250 4i6 839 Retail Total Industrial Acres 193 67 127 Office Professional, TSF-GFA 316 106 210 f i i I i i I I I i i I i I i I I ' I I I I I I i i I 1 , ATTACHMENT IV The City of Grand Terrace and Vicinity O Activity Centers ' 1t.•1J• __ %� '=6• TON r ••:: .BAR _ $�� _PAL � .•' i Activity Centers YAN-BUREN I i i , 1 1 Within the City ' O Outside th C e y 7--i �t L------ i Boundaries i City Bo I MAIN _._.. __-- Streets 1 i 5) O 0.5 0 0.5 Miles Map Created by Dragos Barbu; GIS Division j ATTACHMENT V N PROPOSED BIKEWAY SYSTEM w E CITY of GRAND TERRACE S PRIORITY # 1 t f111-� r.-- -,PTING ROUTES [.......... ._... _ X" PRIORITY # 2 NIT I:a't I!!r�i• 1 7�' ! r �i%,"i�S''�'lam •s: J�+:�//}�' ' '►'it. .l. :-'- "'f`•' µa- =j.'>iq —-7�i - - - - t�„..„„,_._ e /`-'7�- r.+'11 r 't.:� !l?:!h I' i�t".._._�...� r_f Li',: �•;�/';j �r� r' :: '� y�.( r;l I-- L=.1 ;\ [ ' 000 00 PRIORITY # 3 r.. .r'" ( i. _ ;,ttC r'r � --'-i{'-S ;��'. � •t� �•q .7 ��..!1�I F �I /'1 ! ---+..._�; �::.::_�� '..j; � ,• �:.ra7:..t-..i-� : �,;�.�-r � �Y.�,r ar.i� ,( ���f-1 ��r -� �;r<•• � r� c � -...!' ~ '!Li.L i.11iliii� , t t 17':.,• r 1 , O O (ri 'i�G', i_ I 7=Ff:t�{fes�f lT tt t :i i1 — 7" : - - 1 i 1r trrt: _.,_. , -r7777 .. t La,1ta Fta ! ;1 -- t� ,�..� _IL';j I f r�Lr ;5 ,�!r:j �=t t;4� ` PRIORITY # 4 ti �111 +r { i 1,;•x.a�Stu t . ('•-srr-•.�- ^?� —_f'- ; r-+,---• •T elty'ti ".W.+�:ll.c'"Ti..li.i.srt T T t.�l :-S•4'��, [L L ['(r'" -r,�—r i' I- :ir.1:='_l.-'T'.1.7-t'•tl,�l� • i F rrrry ,; j`..; i^; _... - ;�>=: .� PRIORITY # 5 Ffr TIME.,E �i j�%/� i :..._._....__]`(�S�•i:, `i�[t� _T � "alw. .~ +ili�'6?'iitlr.j ErCi. � ti:11' ----..._h,_ .t : ::_1� :'�1Tl:I:Iffil''�1[l1Tf.E�ITIFir}�fl (_. �..t ��. 3 i �... -S I iii �r, i!(-� rI�3.rT�ia}� EMI i3 L �I _._. a ff 'i r I I : : - ___.-:_ rr.Zi•. -e?TiI I I. ST.:T�rLl'`T.:J �' .... r I ii-._.._._.;. .._.. �-- ' - - '{iti:i::Cyit ty, f tYt?+'!"• �_y-1 'rr�T. ^T 'iT'r r...._L. _ - ._rM1� n_tf; ,� _:: : �.J�i ~ - - - PRIORITY # 6 4 °�, j 1 i Y.i ti��}4r r ? fT I�.tC _ :{: tiiiv' , 11..I_i _Tj't't1._ill'-' -- s �.1. ' _t. i._ 't j ..._.: MI. TI.Z '> -�llliFL11I^l� t ..ru.li :� I�— :....I f,•v11:I:I1:[•:i?7.'r':!:ilal!.. !]•1. YL:- .�rtir-�.�t- -_•�'.�I> .. ...1,_ _.._....-_....{._..�...__._ �.. nr C i.c.. R; r£: III r j 7.tli I ---------- --- - - -- - -- - -- --- -- ----------------- - c;�7:s;.:;-'^:::+r3 r�,'S;' ':'ti'�S*,:?i1r�cMl". .�.cne�r-�«...Pr" ..a, e�`. _ _ ::.:a:.r.: •r. �-r0..f:��^".:2'� "�.8.'�;:`�,",";�:zr,..x:..�„""-y,"j`.;�;+"y €..Yaq,„., »ad.+ ,�.• �� ," ,d�yi�.s:;;�;.yy,.,,pt�. a,"'�"` 'x�, L�' _'.>~ .,s�,�:;= �,,iaa",;,,,.,X•. :?�"'�; .,t.,.'1,,..:,yY.:," �:�M'f „�rll. r,.i:;=`;N I:R":t ,.�i"' �..ir}.,. n��n:". •es: :'�:fr.' :'t �" b,.^Y�Q.►' d."ii�'r.'-"x:..'...,;.''.•�,%. ,^tom :'�" T''.tl{rv::::':�i-" ?•u.�° .B,e, „;• .•'�. Fr":a.,y,':�..,.a.,.�.,'f,,;u.` �t — �'C' ��'�."7;71" �,5. ,L,Y,s..k::a�,.F3.ar1�4:ki.`n"iai;Z<5A';.`.r.�Isar '•.4"u'Y". ;ryl`y"7.4✓:,, q,�a'.' �,_ 1��, - :"Y.,w ':ff`7 "fib; � � , t � ,�a cn_"-,ram=»';'��,�� r ^(�! f'n ,1' '�, '�''+�'r 'A�•w'H. 9,�� fir, n �' r',ti 'µ_ r(y S. I "r '� ``s s } ' nn , C - u.« fr'G,' `t irl,t t•$ r, :.r ''; �,. r hC i i (.` :. ,� ' dai rt'r7""• i 'S r;1 f(<;'':C*%� ?x�S Y; r r,, a b '{r^x';^�h;'fMre�,S" ;4�„$'fir,-M,r' ''4� i '+�J�"'' 'wi r'' � ,�, '•drS it S:o�''(�r�,d7k. t "�*�'A! !• ��u Y'° '� '�S ry��3� 'k.:.ah:',(a.•SM x 4a'4,`"r-,f,`syt ! ,rr 4.�'+A W aJ ir,^4"� " Y.a.°?! l ik,1�''rry'i-"4?" "• ,,. �i_ A,.,^m ,.✓ .,�'�, I1f •{r ,f',,^�^r f�f� r w r f pp �° :,H�jna i�`et•f�.:r' Y".�t f'�• % 't' f� � L .L ' } y,.,,m_ + ,ht t, ,r*y;a¢ v�' �}3 r i'F r?�, - ; � * r' � '.�" a {o C L F4,-2 �� 'r7S tl xt }5 Cfy F• .�•� r� . «Kw?,.t>�,,:i,',t•'3 - f ' Y !+ter +�1 rj,'hi' d It cnvy"ti�'•µ ax q' a ti s" x t.� np- t'I4; � Q LL .Id r7 rt re l epi�'klM� C osr� „ifs o F a-r..' £V;ram F`�"�` �•.,- a •� a 1 'X,gg i 4 ^ it !ia' 4 s i( •(JJ, J V.P 1 '.3 k .....a ��"'y"'3!A� a ''w'• y' '�,.'",AF�s^527b7 wf ■ ■ ■y`� w� �L�` F..�} r- J,i'�I s,u x �V V Ifl ��,�� � � }=4t�i,�c 1 �""' g � sF1 f-A y d - 'dam•=,,, c' °# y p�,�' �r _ r/� _ -.R.. � ''`� >.C,pk� 'i� rin 'tr,' �s ti �rt t�i' �(�')`ff .+d.R^t .i£�^�,(,h rr Y,1 ..�( �-i f.A�' Vf.•^= a � � Y. .� x..' 04 ■,1 �rj yV ,{"Ya�I �y�i a r r� �4,' t '' f , .i,. y !'r!t ast� ef�'1 � Y'z � � (� r C yr �' - ' a..' —"•1'®®B a'i ,� s' i ( C•1"�.y 'x,�� r i�y'u�,+s r N .Q p"T '1 d y. i V '• nr a Y' �i°' iL��"r` ( r r t .-�-i ^ f .6' _ '` e,? r_ L M �r �. `�'�} t6' f � ', � t ,-r m�.w ti�y l ■ ','4 f� a t 4Y' a°•,, r." ti'I i;K a, r "V,t■ ■. t t r,ai+ <3 ,� } 77i i_C c ;a- _. _ ■'' a i t'^-! sv rz } �a I. `1�s"+7' it > 'a.'A..; r **p■ r r, P�,.',h 41 n J �.. � �{ ('i r t l I^ :Y•4,7it� y, h'xr !e.+� al lu xnp f y� � (,,,,duC'' rt',n n't�f�Mrs �, i �.' I - (fa-C F a 1, .� ,, .„p.'=h. :r. �;-r a � 4� 7 r F t 't-�.� tc^n��,`�'C yf'l,f���G �,�r Y� ^t i k L7 �• � L°1 �1� T'• `' �...v i4 I' 111 _ - '�, 1t�a I'.. �fr .? ,�~ ; �r!F'r, r�■tY+e` c:rc�� ��,1.,�,id�- r ,� `��'�'� 4 Ni'���4 ��:��t4 a', � r � LY . ;� t`T— ql � t ( �� TT�1�4i' �'•i: •� �1 l,",.','G:y, �A /� %� 1.1 ,� '(,ti-t�,S'r= _ x r „r 4 'r - �Fz x (}zj�`"!i 4r I t� y`^'�'a� t����M:ttpi r^. J 'I �+� Iry• t�Y '� �a•"'"r�� °+QJ�Y`��, _ E`3``• ';';�'1 i t.'„fix.' a(. r",..'k.11 6"Jj ^.f a.�+ x �.�1i, ;��r„,t./r � 'r�.['• !`�?A� .,]ai 4 �"$ gM7"'?i. ,^�Y .'(, D �����.�".'.�x��'s•--0'"`.��.IL ,-trk ,�'�I•�'tw�,��"pr' +d"'=,.'�,Lf�!!:;r:•Y•M'iy '�};(� � �+ � � �, i t'+ 7 -r—'J��'r"""• `ram w ?"d '`"" R � s.,�.:r . 't„'',,..;� 'v� x. '1' .irr e'' ak- (-r�.% y.^., a r y-F r�•C� ,{ f.."+" ',Ik r.'7 w.' ^�i " 'a 'rk` �s _�,.^s r is (� LY. ' � et �tiT7`�� •°■ z r tf e, .tre:� s r' y v�„ d^"' � S. AD •t ii t I A �r'r+'".+ a, i i t��+ pa4 t'Pf •. s- .4! ��•'} � W / W '- 3"•a tI tRO f y,. ,r a _ h r M� tl'6A ;-. try a. m• - 1� ,1 W W W 0 MMTI# _ r [3•-"=�a m5nu,•s g' �.t;�y :f�� Y rr, 16 J F,c T fl) . ....a .a >r k N rr•. nv •�,y," , �e I� t�iw r �a tt I,t '�� ,y�1� e�:.1.'�., r g,a9,, !rI y ar•�:�ry��Fsw�.i+�lTri•Irlm.*r� � .� +td'�._ n n.:r�� NI� N V( ,C I4, r r;x ,�.`W�'F(.a, ,� ys' .. a,,13 t• '-{, „^"^P..`�';. a.z.7,t'm sa4� ".aa.,w-�._ Mv; :ir t � �'�� •i�-"''t"'>'i.I"'. `�, ��" l ( IHI,w,.,�:�r<.;," "�.;tf; 'r,,,1 C C C I+ g �.:rf^.1 .j, 5 x a r,a `:r:��, .., --�_� t(:pJ;a, NI•#t '�},.''aj A'a, '- �a`+� -�._,�"'If"ydr ++ ,F+ ++ C � a/Jy}'•�p'��1'. r. , t,yi^ �'t K. �.Y,'''�' I�'* i5!•�i S 4 �;(.'z"�• t •~ Ii "r:gr. 1:: F' :"v F_l• ',;'}"F;'"f'.s', ,4u^.-o1+F, tr5'iF,:"t w.V,i.,,: „hr,il'>'''r,'S.i,a;L`;r:V.;,r;rCaiS':�+,c;. r' N V} N ..., �' '_ °' '.�,r �1, '�� � a�Lu.;1 �' + •T�� ,_ r,� �' s�' �,��r q �r r.."+a,a e c ^�, — — — Q 0 _ q�" l >Zr r a yY•'• .w.',t?.rm, f•^ � , ty�k f +{ '6,7' ',''`*���'{ tom, V ,y �C •C L.�/,( '„-I,1 � c� '!e4'' r ,::,r`^ F'�{,`rt"�i t ll 'a r $� P xtwrry� F, }F',,�yr�3�,%�' S�•'�yF�,,,,n�,,r r 9,�t� I W W W Q. Q. LL 1` �'•<,i'°_ a rh. t:. ..3 �I a �, �r r �, h �,r�f'+:+na ��,� 1. C �3irf uc � r 4 I• .cr '1 _ ( a t ;#Fi•'F &5:°r', Ax.rF , 6 rb'' f r `S m � �, i� � _ I, � — — `., tom,+,-•, <' � t;� t.'( •;.•^.,',: .r,.�,,ti •� t�� �E �� �j' ��. 4���ri�°.�r1Tt '' S r I .c3. � .:":i,�h' ;«'M ,I ���• r--�4��' Z '� �: I LEGEND ❑ 1. Civic Center Staging Area. ATTACHMENT V I I 2. East City Limits Staging Area. *3. Terrace Hills Middle School. l`o:Lom:a:Gi:nda N 4. Cage Park Staging Area. 5. Proposed Commercial Staging Area. -- - - -- =: - - - - --- -- ----- --- - --- ---..._.. �- - -- ---- ---6 Stater-Bros-Sho pin -E ter------ - --�-- -- R *7. Terrace View Elementary School. �" /, ❑ *8. Grand Terrace Elementary School. . Wilden Pump Co. ' ,, / /,-' --\ � _ ----�• � 0.Seventh Day Adventist Church addition. -.� 11.Convenience market. P 12. Staging Area-Barton Road at Grand Terrace. . Staging Area at Mt.Vernon and _-. _..._. ..- - -High Water Co. Main Street on Riverside land RP..._. Q' Not available to the general public. BART(O1�L�� P ' P PCR / 1C : .......... ....... ' I�E_BERRY _. P-Bike Rack x. R - ,__....__..._-.-.... --- C-Changing Facilities S-Showers z; -Rest Area U RV N.MIEN s - : _ __ _ --- --- -------- — - --- - - RTA Route_25 -- -- -- ---- ---- 1 Boundaries Streets ;RP 13... MAIN P; --.--- -_ Map created by Dragos Barbu Ta Riverside' Attachment Vill Bicycle Laws This is a summary of the bicycle section of the California Vehicle Code. Readers are, advised to consult the vehicle code at www.leginfo.ca.gov'for more-detailed information and exact wording. ; 21200 Bicycle riders and-automobile-drivers are subject to the same rules of the.road and share the same rights and responsibilities. 21200.5 It is unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle on a highway while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. 21201 When you ride at night, your bicycle must have: • a White headlamp, attached to the bicycle or to the bicyclist's,body, which is visible from 300'feet to the front and from the sides, ' • an approved red rear reflector visible from-5 feet when lighted by motor vehicle headlamps, and • a white or yellow reflector on the front portion of the bicycle visible on each side and a white or red reflector on-the rear portion of the bicycle visible.on each side, or reflectorized tires. 21.202 Riders moving slower man the normal traffic speed must ride as close to the right edge of the road as practicable except: • When passing another bicycle or vehicle going in the same direction; i • When preparing to turn left at an intersection or into a private road or driveway; • When necessary to avoid hazards or hazardous conditions that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge; , • When on a one-way road;which is two-lanes or wider, bicyclists may ride near - either the left or right curb or edge of the road. 21204 Bicyclists must use a permanent and regular seat. Passengers must use a separate seat attached to the bicycle,,and passengers 4 years of age,or younger, or weighing 40 pounds or less, must use a seat that can adequately restrain in place and protect the passenger from the moving parts of the bicycle, and must wear an approved helmet. 21206 Local jurisdictions may adopt ordinances regulating the registration and parking and operation of bicycles on pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 21208 Wherever a bike lane is provided, you must use it if your speed is less than that of the auto traffic. Leave the lane only: • When necessary to pass another bicycle, vehicle or pedestrian; • When preparing for a left turn; • When.necessary to avoid parked cars or other objects; • When it can be,done safely and after an appropriate signal is given. 21650.1 Bicycles operated on or•along a roadway must travel in the same direction as motor vehicles.on that roadway. Source: California Vehicle Code (1990), Article 4. Operation of Bicycles i { I I Attachment 'IX' I Bicycle Tips , General Tips Become familiar with your bicycle. Keep it in good"working order and adjusted properly to fit you. Learn how to perform routine maintenance and to make simple repairs. Remember to-properly lubricate moving parts and check•tires and brakes before leaving on long trips. Use b'i'cycle shops as.a resource. I ' Biking Gear j G I For your protection,,{always wear{a helmet. Head injuries account for 75 percent of bicycle related deaths and permanently disabling injuries. Be sure your helmet has been + approved by the Snell Memorial Foundation, or the American National Standards Institute(ANSI). Don't carry heavy packs on your,back. Instead, use saddlebags, racks or handlebar bags. Don't forget to include a water bottle,tools and a tire repair'kit-on' long trips. Don't wear'headphones while riding your bike. A bicyclist must be constantly alert to potential traffic hazards. ! Rules of the Road Obey traffic signs-'and signals;,they apply to all vehicles, including bicycles. Abiding by traffic laws will gain you respect from other road users. J Wherever,there is a bike lane provided, you must use it if your speed isi less'than the auto traffic. Ride predictably. Try to travel in a straight line, and about a car door's width away from parked cars. If you-are riding erratically, y, drivers may find itdifficult to know when it is safe to pass. I Don't weave in and out between parked cars. Avoid riding beside another cyclist. Depending on road and/or traffic conditions, this can, cause motor vehicles to back up behind You. ! I Communicate your intentions by using hand signals when turning or changing lanes. Always ride with, never against traffic. Be Aware Keep to the right as much as possible,but be.aware of potholes, storm,drain grates, broken glass and other road hazards. Watch out for cars turning right, doors opening on parked cars and other unexpected events. Cross storm drains and railroad tracks at a right angle. Never assume that drivers are aware of your presence. Always make eye contact. Scan the road around you. Keep your eyes roving constantly for,cars,people,road hazards, etc. Making Turns at Intersections Right Turns To make a right turn,position yourself in the,middle of the right-turn'lane(or right lane if no right-sum lane is available) and turn right. When traveling straight ahead and approaching a red light, look behind you and, when safe, move onto the line separating the right-turn lane from the right lane of through- traffic. This allows-room for cars to turn right. If no right-turn lane is available,position yourself in the middle of the,right lane. If the lane is wide enough, allow enough room on your right for,cars to turn. Left Turns For Inexperienced Bicyclists: Stay to the right. Ride straight through the intersection to the far-side crosswalk. Walk your bike through the far-side crosswalk. For Experienced Bicyclists Only: When a left-turn lane is available: Signal, move into the left-turn lane,,position yourself to the right of the-first car, and turn left into the lane closest to the curb. Yield to cars before moving to the left. When no left-turn lane is available: Signal,move into the left.lane; position yourself in the middle of the lane and turn left when it is safe to do so. Yield to cars before moving to the left. I Crossing Intersections j Don't pass on the right at intersections. Motorists turning right may notl see you. ` EE I Watch out for cars entering the bike lane--cars preparing to turn right are permitted,to enter bike lanes within 200 feet of the intersection. More Tips Never park your bicycle in a manner that blocks pedestrian traffic. If you are chased by,a dog, ignore it or try a firm, loud "NO! if the dog doesn't stop, dismount with your bike between�you and the dog.Dogs are attracted 'by the spinning of wheels and pedals. 1 At your destination, always secure your bicycle with an appropriate locking device: Registration of your bicycle with your local law enforcement agency will aid in its ' recovery in the event of theft ATTACHMENT X SANBAG CONSISTENCY LETTER l 1' ATTACHMENT XI , RESOLUTION NO 2002-, A RESOLUTION OF THE! CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OY GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND CERTIFYING THE CITY'S BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT SAID PLAN TO THE APPROPRIATE REVIEWING AGENCIES FOR APPROVAL AND TO SEEK FUNDING FOR THE BIKEWAY ; PROJECTS IDENTIFIED HEREIN. , WHRERAS, the State of California, Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Program provides State funds for City and County projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters; and, _ WHEREAS to be!eligible for BTA funds a local agency must have adopted,a Bicycle Transportation Plaan that complies with Section 891.2 of the Street And Highway Code; and, I WHERAS,the Sari Bernardino Association of Government(SANBAG); has an approved Regional bike Plan that includes the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the'City of Grand Terrace Bicycle Transportation Plan has been prepared according to Section 892.1 of the CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE; and is consistent with SANBAG Regional Bike Plan; and WHEREAS, the,City of Grand Terrace requests conformity for the City's Bikeway Transportation Plan from the San Bernardino Associated of Governments; and, WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation' has requested the submission of applications for,BTA funds from eligible cities and counties for the 2002-2003 &2003-2004 fiscal years; and 4 WHEREAS, it is in'the City's best,interest to apply for such funds; and WHERAS, Negative Declaration No. E-02-12 has been prepared forthe BTP. It has to be approved by your.Council with a finding that it is adequate to satisfy the requirements of CEQA for the project. i 4 I l NOW,,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace that: 1. It approves l and certifies) that the City's Bicycle ;Transportation Plan has been prepared inlaccordance with Section 892.1 of thefSTREETS AND HIGHWAY _ CODE; and' ' EXIIIBIT12 I 2. City adopts the SANBAG Regional Bicycle Plan and the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan as the authorized Bicycle Transportation Plan for the City of Grand Terrace. 3. It authorizes the City Manager to submit the approved City's Bicycle Transportation Plan to the appropriate reviewing agencies for approval. 4. It recognizes that the Bicycle Transportation Plan prioritizes projects that are available for state funding,and it authorizes the City Manager or designee to seek J funding for bikeway projects on the priority list included herein. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2002. Mayor : ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney I - C-ITy I E 1 O i f �RRMV TEiZR c i Communit and Economic Development Department I i � NEGATIVE DECLARATION f Pursuant to the Califo a Environmental Quality Act,a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the i environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: ' f An update of the City of Grand Terrace's AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan to reflect the City's Revised Bicycle Route Implementation Priorities and-to be consistent with SANBAG's Regional Bicycle Plan together with the applicable Street and Highway Code Section 891.2 of the State of California. APPLICANT: City of Grand Terrace I LOCATION: City Wide' I G OF NO SIGNIFICANT I FFECTS: FINDING � I� ; I Based on the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. I I ' Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director Date i City of Grand Terrace' ; k GLK:JL:jl f c:\MyFiles\JOMV\bicycleplans\bikeplan-nd i i I f EXHIBIT 3 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 1 City,of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department Environmental Checklist Form & Initial Study 1. Proj ect Title: GPA-02-01 and E-02-12-update ofthe City of Grand Terrace's AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan to reflect the City's .Revised Bicycle Route Implementation Priorities and to be consistent with SANBAG's Regional Bicycle Plan together with the applicable Street and Highway Code-Section 891.2-of the State of California 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department 22795 Barton'Road' Grand Terrace,CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gary L.Koontz,Community Development Director: (909)430- 2247 4. Project•Location: City-Wide,City of Grand Terrace,CA 92313 5. Project Sponsor's Name City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department 6. General Plan Designation: N/A 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved,including but not limited to later phases of the project,and any secondary, support,or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) An update of the City of Grand Terrace's AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan to reflect the City's Revised Bicycle Route Implementation Priorities and to be consistent with SANBAG's Regional Bicycle Plan together with the applicable Street and Highway Code-Section 891.2-of the State of California. The revised implementation priorities will consist of the following: As a new"Priority One," a bicycle route is being proposed along both sides of Barton Road from Mt. Vernon to Michigan Avenue and down the west side of Michigan to Main Street. Such a route would complement the proposed"Safe Route to School'grant/proposal the City recently made earlier this year. It would also provide a tie-in to the Main Street route with its connection to the bike routes in the City of Colton along La Cadena Avenue. In addition,"Priority One"includes both sides of Canal Street from Barton Road to Newport Avenue and both sides of Newport Avenue from Canal Street to Grand Terrace Road. A second new route is proposed as a "Priority Two." The route would include both sides of Grand Terrace Road to Barton Road and both sides of Barton Road from Grand Terrace Avenue to the new Union Pacific Railroad Bridge. Finally,we are suggesting that this proposal also include both sides of La Cadena Avenue where it falls within the jurisdiction of the City of Grand Terrace. This route would avoid the bottleneck of the bridge over the I-215 Freeway which isn't due for any improvements for many years in the future. A new"Priority Three"is proposed to construct bike lanes on the west side of Mt.Vernon Avenue from Barton Road north to Canal Street and the northerly City limits,and then on both sides of Canal Street from Mr.Vernon to Newport Avenue. This would complete a missing link with the City of Colton along Mt.Vernon Avenue and completelthe bike lane'improvements on that portion of Canal Street,north of Newport Avenue: rG "Priority Four"would be the construction of bike lanes on both sides of Commerce Way from Michigan Avenue to the existing westerly terminus of Commerce Way and both sides iof the future extension of Commerce Way.,This proposed route would remain the same as in the original Bicycle Transportation Plan except that the portion along Michigan between Barton Road and Commerce Way has already been included in the recommended"Priority One route above. "Priority Five"is new proposal to include a Class H route on both sides of Grand'Terrace Road from Mt.Vernon Avenue to Barton Road. Finally,"Priority Six"is that portion along the Gage Canal between Main Sheet and Barton Road;the portion northerly of Barton Road has been included in the priorities 2 and 3,above. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) { i North: N/A. I 1 East. N/A. South: N/A. i West: N/A. I 10. Other agencies whose approval;t is required .(e.g., permits, financing approval, or-participation agreement) SANBAG I f j i i f I ` 1 i I I J i I I I t I Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources' ' ❑ Utilities and Services Systems ❑Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑Water ❑Hazards ❑Cultural Resources ❑Air Quality- ❑Noise ❑Recreation ❑'Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency): I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have lasignificant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed, ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. (Sidnature Date John Lampe Associate Planner Printed Name Title I I Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one ! involved (e.g.the project falls outside a fault rapture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will 'not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact",is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one' or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is required. j 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of j mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed 'in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged,to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached,and j other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. I � I i I I � Issues-(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less"than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (Proposed revisions to the Bicycle Transportation Plan will not involve any modifications to either•a General Plan land use'designation nor a Zoning designation.) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans'or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (There are no known agencies where the proposed update would cause a conflict. ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (Zoning District Map and GIS information on existing land uses in the City have identified no conflicts with- the proposed revisions to the Bicycle Transportation Plan.) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g.,, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ impacts to soils or farmlands; or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant agricultural resources in Grand Terrace) e)•' Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an Q Lk ❑ ■ established community(including'a low-income or minority community)? (The proposed revisions to the , Bicycle Transportation Plan will not effect the physical infrastructure of the Community or disrupt circulation) A brief explanation to answer I: The proposed update of the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan will not be-in conflict with any provision of the General Plan or the Zoning Code. In addition,no incompatibility problems have been identified with the City's existing land uses; nor will the proposed new routes divide any part of the City from any other. Indeed the purpose of the new bicycle routes is to improve the circulation system within the City'and-provide access to regional bicycle routes. 1 Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially "Less than � No CSignificant Significant Significant imp Ict Impact Unless Impact f Mitigation i r I ! Incorporated II. Population and Housing'. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local r population projections? (No residential development is ❑ ❑ ❑ proposed .) l b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ indirectly.(e.g. through 1proj ects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (No residential development is proposed.) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Displace existing housmg, especially affordable housing? (No housing:will be removed because of these proposals.) J A brief explanation to answer II:; The update to the Bicycle Transportation!Plan will not induce growth in.the City or region. All of the proposed new routes will be developed through existing developed areas in.the City. No undeveloped areas will be served. Lastly,no extension of major infrastructure is proposed nor will any existing housing be displaced. jI7 t J i III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result,in or ! expose people to potential impacts involving: a) - Fault rupture? (General Plan MEA%EIR-ES-4) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking?(GP MEA/EIR-H-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Seismic ground failure,lincluding liquefaction?'(GP „ ' ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR-II-1) d) Seiches,tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP MEA/EIR i ❑ e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEA/;EIR II-1) ❑. # ❑ ❑ _ Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ conditions from excavation,,grading,j or fill? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) k1 g) Subsidence of the land? (GP MEA/EIR II-1,Append ❑ ❑ ❑ - B) h) Expansive soil? (GP MEVEIR II-1,�Append B-4 ) ❑ ❑ ❑ G I) Unique geologic or physical features? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ A brief explanation to answer III: I' t None of the proposed new bicycle routes cross areas of the City which are subject to"geologic problems,"nor are an buildings or structures proposed which would be vulnerable to geologic hazards. In addition,if any grading is required for portions of the new routes where additional right-of-way will be.required,an appropriate soils report would be required before any grading could take place for the bike route which would identify any soils problems. Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated IV. Water. Would the proposal'result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,,or the ❑ ❑ ❑ rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR II'I Append B) b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards, ❑ ❑ ❑ such as flooding? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) _ c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ surface water quality(e.g.,temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ _` body? (GP MEVEIR II-1) _ e) Changes in currents;or the course or direction of water U. ❑ ❑ _ movements? _ f) Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through ,❑ ❑ ❑ direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial.loss of groundwater recharge.capability? (GP'MEA/EIR II-1) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-1) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, ❑ ❑ ❑ and 97 Regional WCA Report) _ I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) A brief explanation,to answer IV: Most of the proposed new bicycle routes will be located within the rights-of-way of existing streets and roads in the City. No changes to existing drainage patterns or surface run-off are contemplated. No impacts to the City's ground water supply are foreseen as little or no construction will be required for the new routes,just stripping and signage. I IrI I �1 4 I + 11 I I I I Issues(and Support Information Sources): j Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact, Mitigation Incorporated V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: ' a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an, ❑ ,❑ ❑ ■ existing or projected air,quality violation? (GP J MEA/EIR II-14, and AQMP) j b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ contains an implementing action to reduce such ! . exposure) I c) Alter air movement,moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ i ■ I, any change in climate? I(Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the r region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ proposals are included in the I. I I ' A brief explanation to answer V: I I The updated Bicycle Transportation Plan will lead to additional bicycle routes in th ''City;thereby increasing bicycle trips within the City. No buildings or structures will be constructed which could degrade air.quality. The potential increase in bicycle routes will reduce the number of automobile trips occurring in the City which will have a positive effect on the City's and region's air quality. r i I I � 1 I I I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VI. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result : - a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ (No automobile vehicle trips will result from this proposal.) _ b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? (The potential for any such hazards will be eliminated at the design stage for the bicycle routes.) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ❑ ❑ ❑ nearby uses? (This proposal will not require emergency access.) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑' ❑ ❑ (No parking will be required for this proposal.) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ❑ ❑ ❑ bicyclists? (Any such hazards will be. eliminated at the design stage.) fl Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ - alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (The bicycle routes will be designed to be compatible with all existing transportation systems.) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? (The ❑ ❑ ❑ design of the proposed bicycle routes will be design so as not to conflict with rail traffic. There is no waterborne or air traffic facilities facilities in the City. ) Brief explanation to answer VI: The update of the Bicycle Transportation Plan will lead to additional developed bicycle routes within the City of Grand Terrace,thereby decreasing the number of automobile vehicle trips and reducing traffic congestion. Any potential hazards to pedestrians or bicyclists will resolved at the design stage when each individual bicycle route is designed and developed. Issues(and Support Information SlIources): j Potentially Potentially Less than No t t j Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VII. Biological Resources. Would Ithe proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered,threatened, orfrare species or ❑ ; i ❑ ■ their habitats((including but not limited to ; plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20, Append Ci-no rare or endangered species have been identified in the urban areas of the City.) b) Locally designated species(e.g.,heritage ❑ ❑ ❑ ! trees)? (GP'MEA/EIR U-26 -no large trees have been identified that would have to be I eliminated for the new bicycle routes.) 0Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP MEA/EIR II-20 -no sensitive natural community exists in the urban portion of Grand Terrace.) d) Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh, riparian, and ❑ ❑ -❑ ■ vernal pool)?,(No such features exist in the i a urban areas of'the City.) ' e), Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (GP MEA/BIR 1I-20-no such features exist ,. in the urban areas of the City.) Brief explanation to answer VII: ; The update of the Bicycle Transportation Plan will lead to the development of bicycle routes within the existing urban areas of the City. No biological resources have been identified"within these areas that would be adversely impacted by the new bicycle routes. i l i r Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VIH. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ conservation plans? (GP MEA/EIR H-19, and Append D -the increase• use of bicycles will conserve energy resources.) b) Use non-renewable resources.in a ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ wasteful and inefficient manner? (No such resources will be used in the development of the bicycle routes.) c) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (GP MEA/EIR II-19, and Append B- there are no identified mineral resources in the urban areas of the City.) Brief explanation to answer VIII: No mineral resources have been identified in the City.The proposed update to the Bicycle Transportation Plan is not expected to effect energy conservation plans or non-renewable resources.No potential adverse impacts to energy or mineral resources are expected to result from the revised Bicycle Transportation Plan. I I I I i Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated j IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑ release of hazardous substance { i (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (GP MEA/EIR II-7 =no such substances will belutilized in the development and use of the bicycle ! routes.) b) Possible interference with ❑ ! ❑ ❑ ■ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (GT Emergency Plan, and GP MEA/EIR II-13i the bicycle routes will be developed to be consistent with the existing circulation pattern in the community. c) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ : ❑ ❑ ■ potential health hazard? (GP MEA/EIR II-1-no!direct health hazards will be created by this f proposal.) I . d) Exposure of people to existing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ j sources of potential health hazards? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ flammable brush, grass, or trees? (GP MEA/EIR II-6- flammable materials in the urban areas are very minimal and will not be impacted in this manner by they proposal for additional bicycle 'routes.) I , I Brief explanation to answer IX: The proposed update of the AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan will not create any hazardous substances. The individual design of each proposed bicycle route will eliminate any potential hazardous conditions which co ld result from the construction of the bicycle route. In addition,the proposed routes will not interfere with any adopted emergency evacuation plans. Lastly,there are no fire hazardous areas in the urban portion of the City where the new bicycle routes are proposed where riders could be exposed to hazardous conditions. f I I I � I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X.Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR II-10-bicycle ' transportation is very quiet.) b) Exposure of people to severe noise ❑ ❑ ❑ levels? (GP MEA/EIR 11-10 -no permanent structures are proposed near high noise level areas.) Brief explanation to answer X. The updated Bicycle Transportation Plan will lead to the development of additional,new bicycle routes in,the City. However,bicycling is a very quiet form of transportation and no increase in noise levels are anticipated. XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (No structures are ❑ ❑ ❑ proposed.) b) Police protection? (No permanent ❑ ❑ ❑ structures are proposed.) c) Schools? (No residences are ❑ ❑ ' ❑ r proposed.) d) Maintenance of public facilities, ❑' ❑ ❑ including roads? (Will included in existing maintenance programs.) e) Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ ❑ None identified.) Brief explanation of answer XI. The update oftthe Bicycle Transportation Plan will not increase the need for additional public services. As nearly all of the routes will be Class H to be located within existing road rights-of-way. All maintenance will be included in existing road maintenance programs. Issues(and Support Information Sources):- Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated r XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result in a kneed for new systems or � supplies, or -substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (GP ❑ ! ❑ ❑ MEA EIR H-32, II-33) b) Communications systems? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEABIR II-33) c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑. ❑ distribution facilities? (GP ' =eptic II-30)d) tanks? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR H-30) e) Storm water drainage? (GP ❑ i ❑ ❑ MEABIR 1I-33) I { f) Solid waste disposal? (GP i ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-32) g) Local or regional water supplies?- ' ❑ ❑ ❑ a (GP MEA/EIR II-30) ' Brief explanation of answer XII. The update of the Bicycle Transportation Plan will not increase the need for additional public utilities and services in the community because nearly all of the new routes will consist merely of stripping and signage within existing rights-of-way. No permanent buildings or large structures are proposed. i XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal- a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ highway? (GP MEA/EIR 11-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ! ❑ ❑ aestlietic effect? (No,large structures will,be built as part of the bicycle routes.) c) Create light or glare? (No night ❑ ❑ ❑ lighting is proposed:) Brief explanation to answer XIII. There are no scenic highways in Grand Terrace to be effected by the update of Bicycle Transportation Plan. In addition,the only improvements for the bicycle lanes will consist of stripping and signage. There will be no demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XIV. Cultural Resources. .Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR II-20) (. b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ __' (GP MEA/EIR II-20) c) Affect historical resources? (GP ° ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-22) d) Have the potential to cause a ❑ ❑ physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (GP MEA/EIR 1I-22) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred ❑ ❑ ❑ uses within the potential impact area? Brief explanation to answer XIV. No cultural resources�have been identified within the City;and it is not expected that the minimal improvements required for the bicycle routes will adversely impact any cultural resource. XV. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for ❑ ❑ ❑ neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (GP MEA/EIR 1I-21) b) Affect existing recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ opportunities? (GP MEA/EIR II-21) Brief explanation to answer XV. The update to the Bicycle Transportation Plan will not increase the need for additional recreational facilities within the City. On the contrary,the additional routes will add to the recreational opportunities within the City. ' I 1 I � I Issues(and'Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than , No, Significant Significant Significant impact r Impact Unless Impact (. Mitigation Incoirporated XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. a) Does the project have the potential I to degrade the quality of the ❑ F r ❑ ❑ environment, substantially reduce . the liabitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels,threaten to, j eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or, t. restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the i major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential ❑_ l ❑ ❑ ■ to achieve short-,term,to the disadvantage of long-term, I i environmental goals? c) Does;the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ ❑ are individually limited,but j cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of-a project are considerable when F viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the I effects of other probable future I protects-) d) Does the'project have environmental ❑ Q ❑ ■ effects which will bause substantial f adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? � I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answers XVI. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of updating the AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan with anew list of bicycle route implementation priorities. As discussed above, the development of the proposed bicycle routes will have little or no impact on the existing urban setting. Any potential hazards or problems will be rectified during the design stage of each individual bicycle route. XVII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant.to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR, or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the-following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. ■ Used the Grand Terrace.General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope.of;and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the-earlier analysis. Not Applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measured.which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. Not Applicable GK:JL:jl Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Dept f ' I I i ! Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact tnless Impact ! Mitigation Incorporated Authority:Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References:Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),21080.1,21080.3,21082.1,21083,21083.311,21093,21094,21151;Sunstrom V. County of Mendocino,202 Ca1.App.3d 296(1988);Leonoffv.Monterey Board of Supervisors,22 Cal.App.3d 1337(1990) i i i I I c:\MyFilesVOW\cicyleplans\bikelane-is I I i i i ! I ' I I i I .II I l I I ' I I f I I I I � I i ' � I I j ! i I L,Ty ' 0 CRAMP TERR c Community and Economic Development Department STA YREPORT ; CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: December 12, 2002 FUNDING,REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01(Courity Surveyor Number 16012) .and E-02-13 to divide a 23,866 square foot parcel located on the northwest corner of Stonewood Dr. and De Berry St. into ,two -lots of 15,806 square feet and 8,060 square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing on the proposed lotsplit; Receive any testimony; and Approve the, attached Resolution calling for the approval of the tentative-parcel map. Background: The Planning Commission on November21,2002 unanimously recommended that the City Council approve this requested lot split. There was no opposition to this request at the Commission's public hearing on this matter. The applicant, on behalf of the.owner, is requesting approval of the proposed tentative parcel map to divide the subject site into two parcels or lots-the larger lot of 15,806 square feet and the smaller lot of 8,060 square feet. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed lot division dividing the 23,866 square foot parcel in two. Each new lot or parcel will exceed the minimum standards of the underlying R1 -7.2 zone in terms of area (7,200 square feet), required lot width (60 feet interior lot, 65 feet corner lot), and required lot depth (100 feet). Exhibit 2 is a 8 Y2' x 11" reduction of the tentative parcel map. The larger of the two lots (the easterly lot) will front on _Stonewood Drive, a 60 foot wide local street. 7 This lot will have an average width of 124 feet and an average depth of 130. feet. This lot contains a 1,900 square foot residence:Thesmaller lot(the westerly lot) will front on De Berry Street, a 66 foot wide local collector. 1t is currently vacant. This lot will have a width of 65 feet and a depth of 124 feet. Having a frontage on De•Berry Street is not out of character for the area in that there are many other residential lots nearby fronting on this street. Please.see Exhibit 3 which shows the "lot pattern"for the immediate area. Exhibit 3'also shows which lots in the immediate area are equal to or smaller than the 22795 Barton Road• Grand Terrace, California 92313-56k0AbA ITEM ® U,�/ smaller of the two proposed lots. It also shows which lots are equal to or smaller than!the larger of the two proposed lots. i The applicant has not submitted any plans for residential construction at this time for'the smaller of the two parcels. Ariy;future residential construction on; the westerly lot!will { require, under the existing zoning code, the filing of a, site and i architectural review application. At that time such issues as .the design and appearance of the proposed i residential structure will be reviewed along with a preliminary grading 1 plan'of the westerly lot. f I Exhibit 4 is the staff report to the Planning Commission-including the!responses from City Departments and public agericies on this request. Exhibit'5 is the Resolution of Approval including findings in s,u.pport of this application and the proposed conditions of approval. It has been determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of;the California Environmental Quality Act. i Recommendation: , I The Planning Commission and staff recommend thatthe City Council approve the attached Resolution of Approval (Exhibit 5),for Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-61. 4 1 Respectfully submitted, Approved;by: j J Lampe . � ' ; . � ' Gary L.goontz as A opiate Planner Community Development Director { JLJI i Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 Exhibit 2: 8 Y2" x�11" Reduction of Proposed Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit 3: Lot Pattern Showing Existing Lot Sizes Exhibit 4: Planning Commission Staff Report of November 21; 2002 Exhibit 5: Resolution of Approval c:\MyFilesXJOHNXbicycleplansXcouncil.rpt 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 16012 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 9799, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 139, PAGES 47 AND 48, RECORDS OF SA�N BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE 1' 40* L _ i <a OF PM 1077 PMB 115' 65' f30' EXISHNC I 10/70 HOUSE 777 — 96i , 7 C O OF LOT 1 I to TO DARRr AND,AD-ANN CRAB PARCEL 2 PARCEL t I 1 BY D®RECORDED n Fi. r R I 1 AS 8,060 SIX 15.806 SO F DOG 86-365560 `I _ O.. PAD •_• •� .?J CERRFICA7E OF 98 ELEV.=f001� I3 I CCOMPLIANCEc I 1 88-026966 O.R. h IOOd-_ 1:1 R=20. Z 65' 1f0' .�0. •- 4 J S DE BER 2Y ST.1 5 S S S S �VCP � SD SD Sp SO 51'STORM DRAIN 1y - - — W -WATER MAIN W -- /lJ "� i� N' — L_ A O' PAR PAS. 2 PAR NOTM. UMMES: O1 EMSRNG CURB AND GUTTER. TiECTRIc: ®EMmNG 4'SIDEWALK. ORIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO. 50.CAL ED19ID{ E=NG UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN. 1450 WASHINGTON Sr. IJ51 EAST T$1CLS Sl Q4 ETRSRNG SIDEWALK RAMPC5+-Ta+• 92324 OMARf9 CA W761 (909)825-4f28 (909)9J0-861Q O5 EMfTING STORM DRAIN DITCH BASIN. SEWER: CABLE T.V_ ©E)=NG ZONING RI-72(7200 SO.FT.MIN.) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADELPHA CAENE O722795 B4RTON RD. APN 1167-T41-Oi1 GRAND TERRACE,CA 92313 2090 NO 'UI Sr OB STREET ADDRESS, 12.284 STONEWOOD DRNE TELEPHONE. ( � CATHE 92401 O9 CW INTENT PA AND PURPOSE OF 47E PARCEL MAP IS FTo UTURE PACIFIC BELL CREATE PARCEL 2 AS A SEPARATE OVE LOT FOR FUTURE M73 ADAMS Sr. SALE OR DEVELOPMENT. ANY IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING OR CRAOING 17NEIt51D& CA 92504 WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. (909)J59-2515 GAS: SO.CAL GAS CO. 1981 WEST LUGONIA AVE. REDLANDS, CA 92J73-OJO6 4 (909)J35-7741 �P h `M1 BARYON RD. 12284 STONEWOOD DR, NO SCALE EXHIBIT 2 Ij U PAIX REED ¢ ST.. AVE. 3 DE BERRY ST. o' i PREPARED BY.• ADDINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERING 22737 BARYON ROAD,SUITE 2 VAN BUREN ST.. GRAND TERRACE CA 92313 (909)825-6692 OWNERS, VICIN17Y MAP SAMIR AND MIRNA ZAKHARIA � I ' I ' 16 0 01 M104 'If T LOT TUDY I I , . LA PAIR Be_ez toalo4' Sys, , 20715 ��' �° 30 Db _ I 20 \ \, 227.15 �\ �4\\ 8 27 54B BI a 116 V ze 144 _ Par. i Par. :27 13 22107 �a . ;...: ld 115.05 Its A. .I ;. . zoo fie I :1 ) �\� 1 4 4♦ xa,s6. :,I. ._ 5 \ N \ s Be.,* SUBJECT SITE �p:= 3:9 iiIE-ET— 200 , 227 , • �' S.• Par. 1 ' '" \ 17, Rm i;.- zoo n'1s w. e) T f'?': `\}, 67.74 i- \�\\ w yl �.2.5': �<, o i::. �L��f`- •2,2 .:�� i23'`.g: 24 •I 5 06 � � / � 42 'a• 43: 44 I 100 e5 _ 50:13 07.7J`, f7:77 67:7J1 61:10 \ss j ng .- {: 101.60 n0 �•i51:77_ ;:,,6D. �0•:it' � 60 60 ep l \ 6a Z all 1J 7 ' S43 Par. �POlc Qs. 0 ,15 �\ \ •\ \ I 5 r pn Par. s,. _ Par.:"2` : \ \ im. f i` J. r .r...,: � � �,Y�.::a`60:. ::�.a..:6G.•:.d..r`.- ,k0':i •� •60�. ��` \ 77qG � 9 �\ I \\\\ a eo\� �.�,.1,4;: ` = 11 \ 32 7Jll f`fi 7. M1, 's1� US Del FyLMAis— — j IPtA I m O Ph. 2U — 1 "` •s;.r a\47.ft o�., er.of (9.78 AC.) z$' If} \� Iti 216 41 176.e9 _ 125 41� \ 42 Ti`MI 30 30. 370 O J D / `e D9 �• „ :¢ sa _.s4 � 1Q �0' m \ ibo ', '>9.us'� r.- 7i• I `,<98.J1 I a \- ! per\ 370 a ;:: 100 7s.:• -\ 24` 25 2 34e �_' `•_'t✓ ` I 4'3 55 '6,.., :,.- L1'2� I ti� � `„ 4 Par. 3 � m �3 - 51 \•'a �_-.i`is i9' 29`x';m �'`` - { \,,.I ',II'. m 120.31 �� 14 t 20J Its 2 51 �'o -¢ IOOr_ I I I ,�. , Ixe . 75 7: » z ns A �— - - -�Ikvi-S— — —4- - - ^�� �_ 120.32 .. i \ r:Ra�: 2 e 8 2B I \ R r. '1\ _ 57 8 I 63.71, Be eB. Its 33 cti \\\ `7� Jo 130 ' �6�• _ 25 _ 24 75 )2 i,73., _ 'too.3j' — 77 - �7�pp�(L„ I 58 9 7 0 fi 5 ¢ — S H E-E 1 n — —1 I-ts 100 30 130 e3.33 - Be I so LOTS<_ 89060 SQ. FT. I EXHIBIT 3 J O� GRIN TERR CE Community and Ecmomlc Development Department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community and Economic Development Department DATE: November 21, 2002 i SUBJECT: TPM-02-01 (TPM 16012-County Surveyor Numbed,and E-02- 13 -Divide the subject parcel into two separate lots,one having an area of 15,806 square feet and the other having an area of 8,060 square feet. APPLICANT: Addington Consulting Engineering c/o William H.Addington LOCATION: 12284 Stonewood Drive(rectangular shaped parcel on flue northwest corner of the intersection of Stonewood Drive and De Berry Street. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing,.receive testimony, close the public hearing and recommend to the City Council the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 (TPM 16012) and approve Environmental Review Case No. 02-13 to divide the subject site into two separate lots of 15, 806 square feet and 8,060 square feet .•..•..•..•..•..•..•...•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•....•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..•..• ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: It has been determined by staff that this project qualifies for a Class 15, Categorical Exemption as allowed by the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guidelines in that the parcel is located in an urban setting;is relatively level; is adequately served or can be served by public utilities and services; is consistent with the provisions of the zoning code; and does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent) ZONING AND LAND USE: The project is located in the Rl -7.2(Single Family Residential Zoning District-minimum required area of 7,200 square feet). Properties in the surrounding area are also similarly zoned. The subject EXHIBIT 4 22795 Barton Road ® Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 ® (909) 824-6621 1 i site is developed with alone story single family house of approximately 1,900 square feet: Properties in the immediate area are developed{with single family residential uses. Please see Attachment 1 which is the aerial photograph of the subj ect site and the surrounding area showing development.in the area. 1 ; G � The Grand Terrace General Plan designates the subject property and surrounding properties as-Low Density Residential (LDR)which is a residential classification with a density range of 1 to 5 mnits per net acre. The proposed lot split is consistent with the General Plan designation. REQUEST: I I I The applicant, on behalf of the owner, is requesting approval of the proposed tentative parcel'm�ap to divide the subject site into two parcels or lots-the larger lot of 15,806 square feet and the smaller . lot of 8,060 square feet! Exhibit 1 shows the proposed lot division dividing the 23;866 squarefoot parcel in two. Each new lot or parcel will exceed the minimum standards of the underlying RI 7.2 , zone in terms of area(7,200 square feet),required lot width(66feet interior lot, 65 feet corner bt), and required lot depth(100 feet). Attachment 2 is a 8'/2"x 11"reduction of the tentative parcel imap. The larger of the two lots(the easterly;lot)will front on Stonewood Drive,a 60 foot wide local street. Thi's lot will have an average width of 124 feet and an average depth of 130 feet. The smaller lot fthe westerly lot)will front on De Berry Street,a 66 foot wide local collector.This lot will have a vwidth of 65 feet and a depth',gf 124 feet. Having a frontage on De Berry Street isinot out of charactefffor the area inIthat there are many other residential lots nearby fronting on this street. Please see Attachment 3 which shows the"lot pattern"for the immediate area. _ Attachment 3 also'sho s'which lots in the immediate area are equal to or smaller than the snaler ' of the two proposed lots. It also shows which lots are equal to or smaller tlian the larger of the two proposed lots. The applicant has not submitted any plans for residential construction at this time. Any fititure residential constructionlon the westerly lot will require,under the existing zoning code,the filing of a site and architectural teview application. At that time such issues as the design and appearance of the proposed residential structure will be reviewed along with!a prelimin' grading plan of the westerly lot. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: The following response's have been received from the City,County and Other Reviewing Agencies: Riverside Highland Water Company ' Please see the comments from the Riverside Highland Water Company in its letter to staff dated October 9,2002 regarding this project(Please see Attachment 4). I ' Building and Safety/Public Works: Please see the comments made by the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in his memorandum dated October 10, 2002. (Please see Attachment 5) City Engineer: Please see the comments,made by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated October 14, 2002 (Please see Attachment 6). City Traffic Engineer: Please see the comments on this project made by Craig Neustaedter,the City's traffic engineer, in his memorandum dated October 1512002 (Please see Attachment 7). County Fire Department: Please see the"no comment"note made by the County Fire Department representative on October 13,2002.(Please see Attachment 8) ISSUES UNRESOLVED: J There are no unresolved issues regarding this proposal at this time. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staffbelieves that this is a reasonable request. Both lots will meet the minimum requirements of the RI -7.2 Zone. In addition, there are other lots in the immediate area to the east and south of the subject site which are equal to or slightly smaller than the proposed westerly lot. In addition, the proposed easterly lot is also larger than some lots to the east-or.south. In addition,there are many lot in the immediate vicinity which also front on De Berry Street. The proposed westerly parcel is consistent with the neighborhood pattern with respect to street frontage. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Upon approval by the Planning Commission, the proposed tentative parcel map will be subject to the attached conditions of approval as shown in the Resolution of Approval(Attachment 9). RECOMMENDATION: The staff of the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution(Attachment 9)to approve Tentative Parcel Map, TPM-02-01 together with the Environmental Review Case No. 02-1-3. I � I , I I I Respectfully submitted by: Approved by: J Lampe, Gary L. Koontz j Associate Planner i Community Development I Director Attachment: Attachment 1 -Aerial Photo of Subject Site and Surrounding Area Attachment 2 - 8 %2"x 11" Reduction of Exhibit 1 Attachment 3 -Lot Pattern Showing Existing Lot Sizes in the Immediate Area j Attachment 4- Letter dated 10/09/02 from the Riverside Highland Water Company Attachment 5 -Memorandum dated 11/07/02 from Director of Building& Safety Attachment 6 -Memorandum dated 10/14/02 from the City Engineer Attachment 7 -Memorandum dated 10/15/02 from the City Traffic Engineer ! Attachment 8 -Note;dated 10/13/02 from the County Fire Department Attachment 9-Resolution calling for the Approval of TPM-02-01 and E-02-13 Exhibits: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 (TPM 16012) I t I i i c:\MyFilesUGHN\ADDINGTON\TPM-02-01 comm.rpt WE .......... M3 . ......... iww w g ON -ni is mp;r.—" ISMA me. 1 31-1 iM Ulm WN Mo. 'M Ex ................................. n V. ....... ..... T 0 I:z#,A �Ielwtfll- *1 • TENTATIVE PARCEL ASAP 16012 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 9799, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 139, i PAGES 47 AND;4B, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I I I I I I ' I I ' I ' � I I II ' t j PARCEL I ` h ► ► _ 1 OF PM 1077 115' 65' I30' EXISTING PUB ID/70 OF I I j ` 777 56 A i l � HOUSE POR. LOT 1 CONVEYED Tb DARRY AND JO-ANN GRABLE PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 I I I LY I I I I BY OFID RECORDED N 8,060 SO.FT 15,806 SO FT. AS DOG 86-J65560 O.R. •_• ._'.- aB CEATIFlTA7E OF 22� ILEELEV.=1001�C. '0 i COMP MICE I W 1000 — I 1 3 I I 88-D26966 O.R. j o W u R=20' Z _- 65 110' O j �1-4x n 4 i n ry S n DE BER 2RY ST. 6 s s n S S sEWER �� SD SD SD SO 51'STORU GRAIN- - W �. _ — W n _— WATER W /�.J w ;.� W MAMI OT : :? .. PAR I ' I I nrorEs: j MUMS. Oi EXISTING CURB AND GUTIER. WATER: O EJfaTING 4'SIDEWALK. RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO. SOL CAL 7450 WASHINGTON Sf. 1>61 EASE F?NNCIS ST, O EpSTiNG UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN. COLTON,CA 92324 a1LVN0, CA 91761 4O EXSTING SIDEWALK RAMP. (909)825-4128 (7iffi)9J0-B412 6O FXIfTING STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN. SEWER: 17lJXE TV: 0 EMnNG ZONING RI-7.2(7200 SO.FT.MIN) CRY OF GRAND TERRACE ALETPHA CABLE Q7 APN 1157-241-011 .. 2GRAND2795 BARTONRT RD.CA 92JIJ T�0 NORTH a�ST SATs BNORT H/N0,C1 92401 O STREET ADDRESS, 12284 STONEWOOD DRIVE TELEPHONE (9fa)475-5600 O THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THIS PARCEL MAP IS TO ' PACIFIC BELL CREATE PARCEL 2 AS A SEPARATE R-1 LOT FOR FUTURE 3073 AUWS ST. SALE OR DEVELOPMENT. ANY IMPROVEMENTS OR GRADING RrAUMD&CA 92504 WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AT THE THE OF BUILDING PERM?. (909)359-2515 GAS: SO.CAL GAS CO. 1981 WEST LUGON14 AVE. REDLANDS,I CA 92373-0306 (909)MS-7741 P l h BARTON RD. I 12284 STONEW000 DR. NO SCALE LA PAX S1 5T. A_ 4 3 DE BERRY ST. 2' c� 2 PREPARED BY., w ADDINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERING I 22737 BARTON ROAD,SUITE 2 j VAN BUREN ST. GRAND TERRACE CA 92313 (909)825-6692 ' I VICINITY MAP A TT A C14V[FINT 2 0SAMIR AND MIRNA ZAKNARIA I ' 16001 16004 LOT STUDY lo 02 7 A 227.13 2 um ~' 200 .37 200 Par. i 35 17 19 Ix .40 60 FUL Ph. 20 16 30 22 345 120.31 80 100 33 30 OR ATTACHMENT 3 �J��Fr,,.,•.,: Fey �q� I I ' 1450 E. Washington St. a Colton, CA 92324-4696 (909).825-4128 ZWk(909_) 82 -1711r SERVO 0- October 9, 2002 . r ivir. John Lampe 11 City of Grand Terrace I 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 9231,3 # I Re: Lot.Split— 12284 Stonewood Drive; Grand Terrace f Dear W Lampe f. 1 Riverside Highland Water Company does not have a problem with this lot split. If the new lot is.to be built on, it,,will need water-stock, a water meter,"the water service installed and fees paid._ ' If you have•any questions regarding.this matter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 825-4128., Thank your." J r Sincerely, , { Rich Haubert C i Distribution Superintendent { ass ATTACHMENT 4 Comm* '12-2.1105 MEMORANDUM D 7ERR C TO: John Lampe, Associate Planner UGH K�� DEPARTMENT OF FROM: Jerry Glander, Director of Building and Safety/Publk Works ` • '--`BUILDING & SAFETY, PUBLIC WORKS DATE: November 7, 2002•(Revised) AND HOUSING SUBJECT: TPM-02-01 (TPM 16012) - 12284,Stonewood Drive 22795 Barton Road Suite B Grand Terrace. The following items should be considered as conditions of approvalf6r the above California 92313-5295 referenced project. Civic Center (909) 825-38251 Construct . Consruc standard driveway roac . Fax (909) 825-7506 506 y� h • 2. Install 4" sewer lateral from existing main to the parcel. 3. , Provide grading and,drainage plans. 4. 5. All utilities shall be run underground. 6. Provide will serve-letter from R.H.W.C. 7. All plans shall be designed and improvements performed by person registered and licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California,Business and,Professions Code, which shall comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 1997 H.B.C. and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 8. Pay all required fees, obtain all.permits, inspections and approval on all work to be done. ATTACHMENT 5 OCT.14 '2002 i4:34 l 1 #1149 F.003/004 i I I MEMORANDUMk To: John Lampe, Associate Planner 1 From: Elroy Kiepke,.City Engineer' Date: October 14, 2002 Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 02-01 (PM16012).' I I As requested I have visited the site to evaluate the pro;posaL As oted the proposal does seem straighfforward. The-Streets and Curb and Gutter at this location are in excellent condition. Therefore minimal conditions are recommended. Attached for your consideration are the City engineer's recommended conditions of approval for the referenced parcel map. Attachment ! " KRN J ' MSTeR:CCW V GENERAL 1. Details shown on the tentative map n P are of necessarily approved. An details ir Y s htch: are inconsistent with requirements of ordinances,',general conditions of approval, or City Engineer's policies must be specifically` approved) in the final .map or improvement plan approvals. 2. A final parcel map prepared by, or under the direction of a Registered Civil Engineer' authorized to practice land surveying, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, must be processed through the City Engineer's office prior to being filed with the County Recorder. - I ! I 3. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An sBpdated title report shall be provided before the final.parcel map is released ifor Kling with the County Recorder. 1 4. Monumen4ation of parcel map boundaries, street centerline and,lot boundaries is required for a"map based on a field � � survey. , r 1 ATTACHMENT I3MENT I I I { OCT.14' 2002 14 :..:J �1149 P.UC9/OQ�, City Engineer's Recommended Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 Page 2 5. Final parcel map shall be tiled with the County Recorder and one (1) mylar copy0f; filed map shall be submitted' to the City Engineer's office of, permits. prior to' issuance 6. Comply with all requirements of the,Subdivision Map Act. 7. The City reserves the right to impose any new plan check anchor permit fees; approved. by City Council subsequent to tentative approval of this map. DRAINAGE AND GRADING a. Historical or existing storm water flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity to the street, a public drainage facility, or,an approved drainage easement. ROAD 9. New drive approaches,shall be constructed at least 3', from any above-groundobstructions in the public right-of-way to the'top of'Y'or the obstruction shall be relocated. 10. Drive approaches shall be at least 12'wide. Aft 2 11. Developer shall construct a wheelchair ramp per City standards at the comer of Stonewood and De Berry, as the existing ramp'does not comply with the ADA. SEWER 12. Approval of this land division is contingent upon the installation of separate house laterals to serve each lot of the land division. UTILITIES 13. Pourer, telephone and cable_televi�ion service shall be underground. 14. Any utilities that are in conflict with the development shall be relocated at the developer's expense. WATER OCT. 14'2002 14. .35 f A1149 .P.Oowoo. I 1 I . 1 City Engineer'sl Recommended Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 Page 3 f 15. All lots;shall be seined by adequately sized water system facilities. which shill: include,fire hydrants,of the size, type and location as determined by the Fire Chief, f . 1 16. The water mains shall' be of sufficient size to accommodate the total domestic and fire flow required foc the land division. Firs flow,s�required are to be determined"b1 the Fire Chief. j �° ; ' I t ' j 17. Prior to the filing of the final map,',there shall also be filed vv'ith the City Engineer, a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider c1mpliance with the-Fire Chiefs fire flow requirements. i f I fI 1" 1 ` I f � I Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:29 AM Craig S.Neustaedter 949 552 4357 p-01 A E su, P.O. Box 18355 phone.949 552 1357 Irvine CA 92623 fax: 909494 44CO 6-mair tepirvinegeartnlink.net mole W 909 263083 Date: October 15, 2002 To: John Lampe, Associate Planner, City of Grand Terrace From: Craig S. Neustaedter , Registered traffic Engineer (TR1433) Subject: Comments on Subdivision of residential parcel Location: 12284 Stonewood Dr. File No: TPM-02-01 F I have reviewed the above referenced project. It will have no significant traffic impacts. 1 have no additional comments. J 1 Transpor fatibn Engineering and Planning, Inc. ATTACHMENT 7 1 , F I ' cirr fir' .� �•,.. I. I , jow 6Mho rea c Community and Economic Develd meat jDep T-q nt I , DATE: October 1,,2002 I FILE NO: TPI4T-02-of I APPLICANT: Addington Consulting Engineering I LOCAT14DN: ; 12284 Sionewood Dr,Grand Terrace,CA 4 - SLTB dECT: ' Divide a 23;,866 square foot parcel into two parcel, 8,04 sqt are feet,and j 15,806 sgnare feet respectively I � , Dear Reviewing,Age 1 cy: • i I The applicant is proposing to divide a 23,866 square foot parcel into two parcels,one of 8,060 square feet and the other of 15,$06 square feet square feet at 12284 Stonewood Drive in the City of Grand Terrace. Please find attached the tentative parcel map of the proposed addition. IN ORDER TO INC6 PORATE ANY COMMENTS YQUR AGENCY MAX HAVE ABOUT 1r:`H1S PROJECT,WFS NEED THEM'Bl''4'4VEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 16,200 J If you have ary questions about this request or proposal, please•do not hesitate to contact John Lampe, Associate Planner, at�(90y)430-2247. Sincerely j I' YJoipe,Associate Planner i 7L:}I 1 Attachment: TPtyll 02-0I (Parcel paps, ing proposed drvisipri) . c^.tgyFilesUOH*nstonow�oCleaplagcncyJu � ATTACHMENT, 8 RESOLUTION NO. 01 RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.02-01 (TPM 16012) WHEREAS, the applicant, Addington Consulting Engineering, has applied for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.02-01 (TPM 16012) to divide one (1) residential parcel into two.(2) separate; residential parcels; and, WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 21, 2002; and WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),Article 19, Section 15313, Class 15 -Minor Land Division of four or fewer parcels,this request is Categorically Exempt; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.02-01 (TPM 02-01)to the City Council at its meeting of November 21,2002; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on 2002 regarding the approval of Tentative Parcel Map-02-01 (TPM 16012). NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY `COUNCIL: OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the site is physically suitable for R1-7.2(Single Family Residential District-minimum required area 7,200 square feet)development. 2. That the design of the subdivision-and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 3. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems`or cause a threat to life and property. 4. That the proposed subdivision,together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan and Development Codes. 5. That the proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the regulations of the City's Development Code and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace. EXHIBIT 5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Tentative Parcel Map No. 02-01 (TPM 16012)is hereb j approved subject to the following conditions: 1 General Conditions of Approval: I 1. Details,shown on the tentative parcel map are not necessarily approved. Any details whic are inconsistent with requirements of ordinance, 'general conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals (Condition No. 1 of the October 14,2002 memorandum front the City Engineer). 2. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act(Condition No.6 of the October 14,2042 memorandum from the City Engineer). f I I •� � I 3. The City reserves the right to impose any new plan check and/or permit fees approved by the City Council subsequent to the tentative approval of this map (Condition No.7'of the , October 14,2002 m { orandum from the City. Engineer. Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval: I , 4. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding,the applicant must agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Conditions"letter. The letter form and content to be prepared by the Community Development Department.,I r, 5. Provide a"will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company(Condition No 6 on therNovember 7,2002 memorandum from the City's Building and Safety/Public Work ; Department). I. 1 � I I 6. Monumentation of parcel map boundaries, street centerline and lot boundaries is require for the final map based on a field, survey (Condition No. 4 of the October 14, 2002� memorandum from the City Engineer). + 7. A final parcel map prepared by, or under the direction of a�Registered Civil Enginee authorized to practice',I land surveying, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, must be processed through the City offices prior to being filed with the County Recorder(Condition No.2 of the October 14,2002.memorandum from the City Engineer's office). . I l 8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required, showing all fee interest holders an a encumbrances. An,updated title report shall be provided before the final parcel map is released for filing with the County Recorder (Condition No.13 of the October 14, 2002� memorandum from the City Engineer's office). j 9. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final parcel map(Condition No. 8 of the November 7,2002 memorandum from.the City's Building and Safety/Public Works Department). ` { j 10. Provide proof of final`payment.to San Bernardino;County for sewer assessment. I � I 'I Conditions After the Final Map Approval: 11. Final parcel map shall be filed with the County recorder and one(1)mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits (Condition No. 5 of the October 14,2002 memorandum from the City Engineer). Conditions Prior to Grading: 12. Provide grading and drainage plans (Condition No. 3 on the November 7, 2002 memorandum from the City's Building and Safety/Public Works Department). 13. Historical or existing storm water-flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity,to the street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage easement. The grading,plan shall reflect .this requirement. (Condition`No. 8 of the City Engineer's memorandum dated October 14,2002.) Conditions at the Time of Development of the Parcels: 14. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a site and architectural review for any proposed single family residential use shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Planning Commission. 15. Comply with the requirements of the Riverside Highland Water Company set out in the letter from that agency dated October 10,2002. 16. Construct standard driveway approaches for each project per standards acceptable to the City of Grand Terrace(Condition No'. 1 on the November 7, 2002 memorandum from the City's-Building and Safety/Public Works Department and Condition No.'s 9 and 10 of the October 14,2002 memorandum from the City Engineer.) 17. Install 4 inch sewer lateral from existing main to the southerly parcel(Condition No.2 on the November 7, 2002 memorandum from the City's Building and Safety/Public Works Department)or bond for same. ' 18. Provide that all utilities shall be run underground (Condition No. 5 on the November 7, 2002 memorandum from the City's Building and Safety/Public Works Department). 19. All plans shall be designed and improvements performed by person registered and licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California.Business and•Professions Code, which shall comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 1997 U.B.C.and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code (Condition No.7 on the November 7,2002 memorandum from the City's Building and Safety/Public Works Department). 20. Pay all required fees, obtain all permits, inspections and approval on all work to be done (Condition No. 8 on the November 7, 2002 memorandum from the City's Building and- Safety/Public Works Department). 21. Payment of the Traffic Signal and Circulation Improvement fees as established by Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of building permits. I I f i I I I PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California at!a regular meeting held!the th day of , 2002., I { ATTEST: i - i I i City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof of the City Council thereof I � i II I I , ' I Y I I I I ! E I c:\MyFilesUOHN\ADDINGTON\councilresolution I f i ; I I i I I 1 ' I t I I I � I i RAND TERR C Community-Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: December 12, 2002 CRA ITEM_ ( -) COUNCIL ITEM (X) _ SUBJECT: Measure I Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Re-allocation FUNDING REQUIRED (X) Background: Measure I Funds come from a one-half of 1% of retail transactions and use tax applicable-to' transportation improvement and traffic management programs. This additional sales tax measure was implemented in 1989 and is expected,,to fund$1.6 billion dollars in road infrastructure improvements. In October of every year,the City is required to update our.Measure I CIP in order to continue to receive Measure hFunds. Many of the road improvements that are currently under construction and/or pending are directed by the City Council's top priorities list. Included in the annual funding are projects deemed necessary by staff. These projects can'be changed mid-year with a resolution from City Council. Re-allocation Request: �J The Tanager/Vivienda project was approved by council for$36,587. Upon secondary inspection it was noted that a 13,780 section of Vivienda would require extra grinding along with a 1 '/z inch base paving. Staff agreed to the-changes and the street was completed with-the enhancements. Tanager/Vivienda $36,587 approved $45,607 final cost $9,020 difference Lark Street The council approved'the Kentfield/Lark/Franklin street project at the August 22, 2002 council-meeting for$52,74.1.14. Since that date it was decided to continue paving up Lark Street to the end of the trench. The cost to overlay the street was not included in the original cost. Kentfield Warbler between Van Buren to Franklin Kentfield east of Warbler, Franklin to Franklin Ct. $52,741.14 Original Cost Additional charge for Lark Street $15,147.50 Lark Street Addition Less Riverside Highland Water Company's contribution (10,336.20) Riv Highland's share Final Cost $57,552.44 New Price. i Difference from,.the original cost ($4811.30) Difference COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. ' - J I I i i I � I i STAFF Recommendation: I Re-Allocation of Measure I Priorities for 2002-2003 FY by adding the above priorities. I I I 1 i I i i i I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I i I i i { i � , Resolution No. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,STATE OF'CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM' WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November, 1989, authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the county of San Bernardino, and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of the Authority, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance require each local jurisdiction receiving, revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to.a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction,.and WHEREAS, the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan has been previously adopted, and is on file with the San.Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG), and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that: 1) The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California,hereby adopts the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. 2) In case of an emergency, such as flooding or other major necessary road expenses,these funds could be reallocated. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California,hereby adopts the Measure I Five-year Capital Improvement Program. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council ofthe City of Grand Terrace, California at a regular meeting held on the 12'day of December, 2002; ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. And of the City Council thereof. Resolution No. 2002- I,BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 12th day of December, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: I ' ! ABSTAIN: i ' I ' j I I Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Approved as to form: ' I I City Attorney I j i i I j i ' � I I I , I I I j I j I i I I I I I ' I I ' City o rand Terrace r" MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2001/2006 (Adopted December 12, 2002 YEAR STREET & LIMITS IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 2002-03 Union Pacific Railroad Bridge at Barton Road Replacement and widening of Bride 1 $140,000 . 2000-02, Michigan St. Barton Rd.to Commerce Wy. Upgrade to Major Highway&Signal 1 $105,000 Relocation 2000-02 Barton Rd. at Vivienda Upgrade Barton Rd.to Major Highway incl. 1 $30,000 sidewalks and ADA Ramp at the corner& _ - storm drain 2001-02 Mt.Vernon St. Upgrade to Secondary Highway w/raised 1 $196,000 Grand Terrace Rd./Canal St. median &City entry sign City Entry to 300 ft. south $600,000 2000-01 Minona Dr. Full Street Reconstruction 3 $29,032 Kingston St. to Eton St. 2000-01 Holly-St. Pavement Rehab-OS . 3 $31,589 Eton St.to Arliss Dr. 2000-01 Fairburn Dr. --Full-Street Reconstruction 3 $55,186 Kingston St. to Miriam W . 20.01-02 Arliss Ct Full Street Reconstruction 3 $13,569 Arliss Dr. to north end 2001-02, Arliss Dell Pavement Rehab.-OS 3 $81379 Arliss Dr. to north end 2001-02 Arliss Dr. Pavement Rehab.-OS 3 $13,733 Arliss Dell to Eton Dr. . 2001-02 Arliss Dr. Pavement Rehab. -OS 3 $16,543 Preston St. to Arliss Dell - 2001-02 Arliss Dr. Pavement Rehab. -OS 3 $22,047 Eton Dr..to Arliss W . 2003-04 City-Wide 'Slurry Program 2 $90,000 1 _ 2002-03 Vivienda Ave. 3 $36,587 Tanager St.to Pico Street 2002-03 Tanager Ave. 3 Vivienda Ave.to Michigan St. 2002-03 Barton Rd. 3 $33,696 Honey Hill Dr. to east border 2002-03 Warbler Ave. 3 $57,552 Van Buren to Franklin St. 2002-03 Kentfield Ave. 3 $57,552 Franklin St. to Franklin Ct. 2002-03 Kentfield Ave. 3 $32,112 Kentfield St.to Darwin St. _ 2004-05 Vivienda Ave. Pavement Rehab. -OS 3 $36,587 Tanager St.to Pico St. 2004-05 Raven Wy. Pavement Rehab. -OS 3 $47,178 Wilmac Ave. to Oriole St. 2004-05 -Raven Wy. - Pavement-Rehab.—OS - 3 $26,361 Michigan St. to Vivienda Ave. Total Measure I CIP $1,449,022 Contact: Steve Berry SANBAG's Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 yrs.) $ 849,022 909-430-2226 Fund Balance as of June 30, 2000 681,577 TOTAL AVAILABLE: $1,530,599 NOTES: 1 = Transportation/Traffic Projects 2 = Max. expenditures of general program categories shall not exceed 50%of SANBAG's total annual forecast revenue for the jurisdiction. 3 = Originally,we proposed Measure I to cover only 50%of the cost of projects related to street reconstruction and pavement, saving 50%for transportation/Circulation projects. Over the years, for lack of other revenue sources, we have increased to 60% and to 75%since last year. The - other 25%-is-paid from Redevelopment funds for gas tax funds. - 2 December 12,2002 Street RehaU.,.,d�don Program _ Projects by Fiscal Year (1994-2011) Contribution PRIORITY ROAD NAME FROM ROAD TO ROAD WDTH LGTH . AREA RTG IMP Est Cost Measure I RDA 1999-2000 MINONA DR KINGSTON ST ETON DR 33 1173 38,709.23 20 RS 38,709.23 29,031.92 9,677.31 Total1999-2000 29,031.92 9,677.31 2000-01 HOLLY ST ETON DR ARLISS DR 33 1021 38,694.45 56 OS 42,118.07 31,588.55 10.529.52 2000-01 FAIRBURN DR KINGSTON ST MIRIAM WY 33 1115 36,790.94 36 RS 73,581.88 55,186.41 18,395.47 Total2000-01 86,774.96 28,924.99 2001-02 ARLISS CT ARLISS DR NORTH END 33 288 9,502.33 56 RS 19,384.76 13,569.33 5,815.43 2001-02 ARLISS DELL ARLISS DR NORTH END 33 178 5,867.30 58 OS 11,969.30 8,378.51 3,590.79 2001-02 ARLISS DR ARLISS DELL ETON DR 33 291 9,616.60 58 OS 19,617.86 13,732.50 5,885.36 2001-02 ARLISS DR PRESTON ST ARLISS DELL 33 351 11,584.81 57 SO 23,633.01 16,543.11 7,089.90 2001-02 ARLISS DR ETON DR ARLISS WY 33 468 15,438.86 55 ' OS 31,495.26 22,046.69 9,448.58 Total2000.01 74,270.13 39,907.67 2003-04 City Wide Slurry Program Total 2003-04 90,000.00 TYPE I-POLY EAST SIDE OF MT TYPE II VERNON 2002-2003 BARTON RD 1-215 BRIDGE 64 886 56,674.78 36 SO 85,012.18 59,508.52 25,50165 2002-2003 MT.VERNON AVE MT VERNON AVE CANAL ST 196,000.00 196,000.00 2002-2003 VIVIENDA AVE TANAGER ST PICO ST 33 533 17,581.94 53 RS 37,977.00 36,587.00 2002-2003 TANAGER AVE VIVIENDA AVE MICHIGAN ST 37,334.00 2002-2003 BARTON RD HONEY HILL TO EAST BORDER 21,060.00 33,696.00 33,696.00 2002-2003 WARBLER AVE VAN BUREN FRANKLIN ST 2002-2003 KENTFIELD FRANKLIN ST FRANKLIN CT 57,552.44 57,552.44 2002-2003 KENTFIELD KENTFIELD ST DARWIN 32,112.00 32,112.00 Total 2004-05 415,455.96 2005-06 WESTWOOD LN WESTWOOD ST SOUTH END 24 421 10,093.02 46 RS 22,204.64 47,177.70 5,551.16 2005-06 FLAMINGO ST MICHIGAN ST EAST END 33 266 8,768.39 59 RS 19,290.46 26,360.54 4,822.61 2005-06 KINGSTON ST ARLISS DR ETON DR 33 795 26,240.44 55 OS 57,728.96 26,583.90 14,432.24 Total2005-06 74,418.04 24,806.01 2006-07 GRAND TERRACE RD VIVIENDA AVE NEWPORT AVE 40 1562 62,482.44 58 137,461.37 96,222.96 41,238.41 Total2006-07 96,222.96 41,238.41 2007-08 MICHIGAN ST LADERA ST RAVEN WY 44 340 14,960.00 68 OS -22,440.35 16,830.26 5,610.09 2007-08 MICHIGAN ST TANAGER ST FLAMINGO ST 38 265 10,069.00 63 OS 15,103.11 11,327.33 3,775.78 1 December 12, 2002 Street Rehabilitation Program Projects by Fiscal Year (1994-2011) 2007-08 MICHIGAN ST RAVEN WY TANAGER ST 41 275 11,275.00 69 OL 16,913.03 12,684.77 4,228.26 Project Cost 40,842.36 13,614.12 PRIORITY ROAD NAME FROM ROAD TO ROAD, WDTH LGTH AREA RTG IMP Est Cost Measure I RDA 2007-08 PICO ST DICKENS CT SANBURG CT 41 167 6,865.00 68 OS 6,865.07 5,148.80 1,716.27 2007-08 PICO ST DICKENS CT SANBURG CT 41 148 6,068.00 68 OS 6,068.00 4,551.00 1,517.00 2007-08 GARDEN CT PICO ST NORTH END 33 473 15,605.00 68 OS 15,605.44 11,704.08 3,901.36 2007-08 PICO ST KINGFISHER RD TRANSITION 4-1 581 23,802.00 68 OS 23,801.52 17,851.14 5,950.38 52,340.04 39,255.03 - 13,085.01 Total2'0 -08 106,796.52 - LL 80,097.39 26,699.01 2008-09 MINONA CT MINONA DR SOUTH END 33 349.56 11,535.00 63 OS 11,535.33 8,651.50 2,883.83 2008-09 MINONA DR ETON DR PRESTON ST 33 498.48 16,450.00 68 OL 16,449.96 12,337.47 4,112.49 2008-09 ETON DR MINONA DR MIRIAM WY , 33 325.91 10,755.00 65 OS 10,755.03 8,066.27 2,688.76 ___VICTORIA ST--______ - PRESTON ST_ -_ BARTON_RD 22 -660,19_- 14,524.00-- 68�=SO _ ____14,524.14 _ 101893.10__ 3,631.03 Total2008-09. 53,264.46 39,948.35 13,316.12 2009-10 CANAL ST VICTORIA ST CARHART AVE 33 _ 1,431 47,217.00 68 OS 59,021.57 44,266.18 14,755.39 2009-10 NEWPORT AVE CANAL ST CITY LIMITS 28 1,559 43,665.00 64 OS 43,664.63 32,748.47 10,916.16 2009-1.0 VIVIENDA AVE BARTON RD VIVIENDA CT 33 488 16,114.00 68 SO 16,114.09 12,085.57 4,028.52 Total2009-10 118,800.29 89,100.22 29,700.07 2010-11 DOS RIOS AVE PALM AVE COUNTRY CLUB 33 577 19,035.00 65 OS 19,035.01 14,276.26 4,758.75 2010-11 WARBLER AVE DE BERRY ST DE SOTO ST -33 265 8,745.00 69 SO 8,745.12 6,558.84 2,186.28 2010-11 WESTWOOD ST HONEY HILL DR EAST END 24 1,149 27,578.00 66 SO 27,577.68 20,688.26 6,894.42 _-- 20107.1-1- _ __ FREEMON_T-IA AVE_ ___LADERA ST___ NAPA CT _ _ 33 375 12,361.00 63 OS 12,360.97 9,270.72 3,090.24 2010-11 ORIOLE AVE KENTFIELD ST VAN BUREN ST 33 274 9,037.00 64 OS 9,036.70 6,777.52 2,259.47 Total2010-11 76,755.47 57,566.60 19,188.87 — — -- .------------ — -- --- -- ---- TBA _ MT.VERNON AVE BARYON RD MINONA ST ---------52 -586 - -30;470:47--58 ---SO-- - - -451705:70---1311993.99--- 13,711.7 ------- TBA MT.VERNON AVE DE BERRY ST DE SOTO ST 62 297 18,388.01 49 SO 27,582.01 19,307.41 8,274.60 TBA MT.VERNON AVE CENTER CITY CT BARTON RD 62 500 30,970.54 49 SO 46,455.82 32,519.07 13,936.74 TBA MT.VERNON AVE VAN BUREN ST DE BERRY ST 62 1,325 82,143.24 .58 SO 123,214.86 86,250.40 36,964.46 MT.VERNON AVE DE SOTO ST CENTER CITY CT 62 .522 32,348.74 51 OS 48,523.11 33,966.18 14,556.93 Total. 291,481.50 263,545.58 72870.38 BARTON RD PRESTON ST GRAND TERRACE RD 62 775 48,052.00 64 OS 72,078.43 54,058.82 18,019.61 BARTON RD ARLISS DR PRESTON ST 62 20245 139,166.00 68 OS 208,749.66 156,562.25 52,187.42 December 12,2002 Street RehaL�mcudon Program Projects by Fiscal Year (1994-2011) Project Cost 280,828.09 210,621.07 70,207.02 3 r RAND TERR C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: December 12,2002 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2003-2004: CITY PROPOSAL NO FUNDING REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: Annually, the City, as part of our Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program receives community input regarding projects for the following program year which runs from July through June of each year. This item is presented to receive input and ideas regarding potential projects to be submitted by the City. A more formal public hearing to solicit public priorities regarding our CDBG needs will be conducted on January 23, 2003. The City's CDBG Program is administered through the County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development and the City receives an allocation of approximately$51,000 each year. Over the past number of years, the City had accumulated a reserve of funds which amounted to a budget of approximately$140, 000. There was $72,000 approved during the past year for construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk along Grand Terrace Road in front of the Senior Center. Another$6,700 was approved by council for the conceptual plan design for Petta Park. The City Council should receive public input and provide direction to the City Staff regarding potential projects to be developed by the City and submitted to the County in December. The City Council will formally decide on the prioritization of projects and funding levels on January 23, 2003. Recommendation: That the City Council receive public input on CDBG Projects for the City of Grand Terrace; and Provide input to Staff on suggestions for City projects for the 2003-04 Fiscal Year. COUMUL AGENDA ITEM V40. �CJ