The URL can be used to link to this page

08/11/2005 _ _ FILETOPY' GRSHD TERR CE 'August,11,2005' = 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 j Civic Center (909)824-6621 „ Fax(909)783-7629 Fax(909)783-2600 Maryetta Ferri CITY OF GRAND TERRACE- - • -Mayor Bea Cortes " Mayor Pro Tem CRA/CITY COUNCIL Herman Hilkey Lee Ann Garcia REGULARIMEETINGS Jim Miller Council Members - Thomas J.Schwab ` .2N ) AND 4Tx Thursday - 6�:00 p.m: t�A�l City Manager - Council Chambers. Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 11, 2005 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 PM 22795 Barton Road THE CITY OFGRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE'AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTOF 199W'IFYQiJ `;REQUIRE SPECIAL:ASSISTANCE-TO-PARTICIPATE IN T-JES MEE-!P4-PLEAS . CAL TH Ci- CLERK'S' OFFICE AT;(909)>824-6621 AT,LEAST.48-.HOURS PRIOR::TO`THE:MEETING. ; j , •'AD IF YOU DESIRE b DRESS THE CITY COUNCIL.DURING THE MEETING,PLEASKCOMPLETE;A REQUEST` TO SPEAK:FORM•AVAILABLE-AT-THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT.IT.TO THE;CITY CLERK,:,SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED-UPON BY-THE MAYOR AT THE:APPROPRIATE TIME, * Call to Order- * Invocation-Pastor Rick Doucette,Calvary,The Brook Church * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 07-14-2005 Minutes Approve 2. Report on Close of Escrow(21974 DeBerry Street) ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation - Southern California Association of Governments-40 Years of Service B. Certificate - New Citizen Patrol Member - Mary Denelle Bubier 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register Dated August 11,2005 Approve COUNCIL AGENDA 1 08-11-2005 PAGE 2 OF 3 I AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION i B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda C. Approval of 07-14-2005 and 07-26-2005 Minutes Approve D. Resolution to Direct Collection of Delinquent Sewer User Approve Fees on Tax Roll 2005-2006 E. Travel Authorization-Council and City Manager Authorize I i 4. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,the City Council is prohibited from discussing or acting on any item not on the agenda. The Mayor may request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment. 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Historical&Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of 06-06-2005 Accept 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of 07-05-2005 Accept B. Council Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-14, E-05-16 - a Proposal to Approve Develop 120 Units of Multi-family Senior Housing,a 6,500 Community Senior Center,and a Four Acre Passive Park An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Approving SP-05-01 (Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan)and Environmental Assessment E-05-16 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, Approving General Plan Amendment Case No GP-05-01 for an Amendment to the City General Plan - Community Development Element to Add a New Land Use Designation of Medium High Density Residential B. Street Cut Policy and an Ordinance of the City Council of the Continue City of Grand Terrace, California Establishing Fines for Failure to Obtain a Street Cut Permit and Failure to Perform Street Cut Construction in Accordance to the Specifications as Described in the Specifications for Construction Within t the Public Right of Way COUNCIL AGENDA 08-11-2005 PAGE 3 OF 3 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Measure I Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2005-2010 Approve B. Redlining 350 Ft of Curbing for a School Bus Stop and Approve Adjacent Corner at 22111 Newport Avenue C. Designation of Voting Delegates for 2005 League of Appoint California Cities Annual Conference 9. CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,AUGUST 25, 2005 AT 6:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 08-25-2005 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING_ TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 08-18-2005. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-JULY 14, 2005 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on July 14, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Chairman Bea Cortes, Vice-Chairman Herman Hilkey,Agency Member Lee Ann Garcia,Agency Member Jim Miller, Agency Member Tom Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Jerry Glander, Building& Safety Director Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department ABSENT: Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney APPROVAL OF 06-23-2005 MINUTES CRA-2005-21 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER GARCIA,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the June 23,2005 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes. Chairman Ferr6 adj ourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:10 p.m.,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, August 11, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CRA AGENDA ITEM NG. L,T y ' STAFF REPORT GROND TERR CE City Manager's Office r- CRA ITEM (X ) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE: August 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Report on Close of Escrow FUNDING REQUIRED Q NO FUNDING REQUIRED (X ) Pursuant to direction from the Agency Board,Staff has been directed to report on all real estate transactions after close of escrow. The property at 21974 De Berry Street closed on July 20,2005. The sales price was four hundred fourteen thousand dollars and the agency agreed to pay expenses of fourteen thousand six hundred fifty eight dollars for a total consideration.of four hundred twenty eight thousand six hundred and fifty eight dollars. The Settlement Statement from Capree Escrow is attached. CIA AGENDA ITEM NO. agree 6755 Brockton Avenue DateofEstimate: 0610=005 Riverside,CA 92606 SCroo (951)778.1370 For(051)778-1380 Ekrw No.19766-D jMMAT9D CLOSING Eedmated Settlement Date: July 18,2005 � r 1 � I' Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Ten-ace 2279S Batton Road i Cnand Terrace,CA 92313 (ww,?b• L Pmp mvAwRm.%- 21974 Oe berry Street,Grand Terrace,CA 92313 DEM SIT& Total Corlsidetadast 414,000.00 Deposit 20,000.00 Escrow Fee to CAPREE ESCROW,INC. 1,113.00 ' Drawiug Documents 50.00 Seller Portion of Escrow Fee 1,113.00 r Title Policy Fee-50%discount to Diversified Title 74625' Sub-Escrow Fee 125.00 Record Grant Deed 20.00 Record Recottveyeace 15.00 Docu=ntaty Tmmfer Tax 4S5.40 PayoffDalivery Fee 30.00 Wire Fee 30,00 HOA Charges to Riverside Highland Water Co, _ 13050 j Commission to Tea Lo=Real Estate 10,350.00 I padding 400.00 Zone Disclostuie to LOS Reports,Inc, 79.95 I Cash Due Fmm Buyer 408,659.10 i i j TOTALS 428,652.10 428,658.10 I ' WHEN YOU ARE IN A POSITION TO CLOSE,WE WILL NEED A CASHIERS CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $4089658-00 PAYABLE TO I CAPREE ESCROW' I _ -- - — - ----_ APPROVED: Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Greed Terrace i BY i Thomas ehwab Date 'Q�Yee B.TYPE OF LOAN rr�� 1.❑ FHA 2.❑ FmHA 3..❑ CONY.UNINS. LSCYO?� 4. VA 5. Cow INS. (951)778.1370•Fax(951)778.1380 6.File Number.(Escrow) 7.I=Number 19765-D S.Mortgage Insurance Case Number. SETTLEMENT STATEMENT C.NOTE' This form is furnished to give you a statement of actual settlement costs. Amounts paid to and by the settlement agent are shown. Items marked"(p.o.e.)"were paid outside the closing,-they are shown here for informational purposes and are not included in the totals. D.NAME OF BORROWER' B.NAME OF SELLER: F.NAME OF LENDER Community Redevelopment Agency of the James F.Dodson City of Grand Terrace Patricia A.Dodson G. PROPERTY LOCATION: H. SETTLEMENT AGENT: I. SETTLEMENT DATE: 21974 De Berry Street CAPREE ESCROW,INC. 07/21/2005 Grand Terrace,CA 92313 PLACE OF SETTLEMENT: ESCROW NO.: 6735 Brockton Avenue ' 19765-D Riverside,CA 92506 J.SUMMARY OF BORROWER'S TRANSACTION IG SUMMARY OF SELLER'S TRANSACTION 101. Contract sales price 414,000.00 40 Contract sales price Personal property Personal property 101 Settlement charges to borrower line 1400 13,989.10 403 104 ins 404. 405. Ad ustmenfs or items paid by seller in advance Ad usfinenrr or hems Paid b seller In advance 106. Ci /town taxes 107. county taxes 406. City/town taxes tos. 4o7. Countytaxes 109. 408. 110. 409. I1 . 410. 411. 113. 412. 114. 413. r 115. 414. Ilfi. 415. 1 416. r -• • ' '• = '•• 427,989.10 tt - , • •I • • 201, De 2ositor earnest mone 428,658.00 601, Excess deposit'see instructions) 202, Principal amount of new loans• 502 Settlement cha ee to seller Una 140 203. Existin loans taken subject to - 503 Existin loans taken subject t0 204. Second mortgage loan Pa off first mo a loan Interest Adjustment 205 605 Pa off of second mortgage loan 205. . Interest Adjustment 207. 206. 50 209. 506' 509. Ad astmentr or Items unpaid by seller Adjustments or Items unpaid seller 210 City/town/town taxes 510. City/town taxes 21 COW taxes 511, County taxes 212. 213. 612. 214. 513. 215. 514 216. 515. 217. - 516 218. 61 219 516 619. t • , : •- :,••• 428,658.00 , • , • • tr � 301. Gross amount due from borrower line 120 427,989.10 601. Gross amount due to seller line 420 302. Less amount aid b/for borrower line 220 428,658.00 802 Less reductions in amount due seller line 52 303. CASH(❑FROM) (®TO)BORROWER 668.90 603- CASH(❑TO) ([--]FROM)SELLER FmSe 1 of2 I ARGES 700 TOTAL SALES/BROKBR SCOMMISS16N based an rice $414,000.00 2S0% Dlvlslon of Commissfon line 700 es/ollows: PAID FROM PAID FROM lot. $l0;350.00 w Tens Loma Real Estate BORROWER'S SELLER'S 702. $ FUNDS AT FUNDS AT 703. Commission aid at Settiement to SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT 704. 10,350.00 � I :11 • • • Now 801. -Loan Origination Fee % I 802. Loan Discount % 803 A raisal Fee to 804. Credit Report Fee 805. Lender's Inspection Fee Ell. Mort a Insurance A lication Fee to Assumption Fee I 813. 'II 901. Interest from to n.$ 0.W 902. Mort a Insurance Premium for months to /da 903 Hazard Insurance Premium for 1 ears to 904 905. i - , 1 Ill I •• I 1001 Hazard Insurance months Q$ per month 1002. Mort e e Insurance months $ er month 003 City property taxes months $ ermonth 1004. County -operty taxes months $ month 1005. Annual assessments per months Q$ ermonth 008 I , I 11 1101, Settlement orclosin fce I to CAPREE ESCROW,INC. 05 Document rc oration toCAPREEESCROW.rNC. M113�0000 C 1106 Na` fees 1107 Loan Tie-In Fee to CAPREE ESCROW,INC. Seller Portion of Escrow Fee to CAPREE ESCROW,INC. 1.113.00 _ 1108 Title insurance to-50%disco 1- Ivcrslllca IiOe I (ndudes above items numbers) 746.25 1109. Lender's covers e $ i 1110, Owner's coverage $414,000.00 11 1 Sub-Escrow Fee to Diversified Title 112 Recon.tracking Fee to Diversified Title j 1113, Payoff Delive Fee to Diversified Title .1114: Funds held to 8/1 for clearance ofpayment to Diversified Title Tax Desc-1st Half Taxes to Diversifed Title i1201, Recordin tees: Deed$10.00 ;Mt $0.00 •;Rel$21.00 D$0.00 1202. City/co nty tax/sta s: Deed$455.40 31.00 Mon gage$ 455.40 I •1203. State tax/stamps: Deed$ ;Mart a e$ 1204 Reconve ance Fee to Diversified Title 1205. i i ' I 11 11 • 1301 1302. Pest in tion to 1303. Home Warranty to Old Republic Home Warranty 1304. 1305. 305. Trensfer fee to Riverside Highland Water Co. 1307 ClosingBill to Riverside Highland Water Co. 50.50 1308. 1309 1310. j 1311. 13 2.' Zone Disclosure to LGS Reports,Inc. 79.95 1313. Outgoing Wire to.City National Bank 1314. ------------- 1315 1316. 1317. 'I I • I I 13,989.10 ! E. I I Page 2 0r2 i j t (vas) Check Register Dated August 11, 2005 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/25/2005 10:51:45AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher. Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55896 7/8/2005 006315 ROLLINS, RICHARD June, 2005 June Open/Close/Clean Parks 10-450-245-006-000 1,162.50 Total : 1,162.50 55897 7/11/2005 001937 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY 702866256- Balance due 10-172-246-000=000 7.65 Total : 7.65 55903 7/18/2005 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY June, 2005 June street light electricity 16-510-238-000-000 3,584.15 26-600-238-000-000 49.80 26-601-238-000-000 41.50 26-602-238-000-000. 58.10 -Total : 3,73&55 55907 7/28/2005 001001 AA EQUIPMENT CO. INC. 09 7337439 Mower maint 10-450-246-000-000 4176 Total : 43:76 55908 7/28/2005 010178 ALMAREZ, ALEXIS 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 103.67 Total : 103.67 55909 - 7/28/2005 010293 AVAYA, INC. 2721552921 June phone maint 10-180-246-000-000 183.46 Total : 183.46 55910 7/28/2005 001705 CA. STATE DEPT. OF JUSTICE 528069 June Fingerprinting-Taylor 10-1907226-060-000 32.00 Total : 32.00 55911 7/28/2005 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 7898191957507 June fuel 16-900-254-000-000 176.27 10-180-272-000-000 589.73 Total : 766.00 55912 7/28/2005 001937 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY 704200381 June copier maint Page: 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO �� -- vchlist — ---Voucher List -_ -- -- -_-___- _- Page: —_2--- 07/25/2005 10:51:45AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55912 7/28/2005 001937 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY (Continued) 10-172-246-000-000 21.90 10-175=246-000-000 2737 34-400-246-000-000 60.22 Total : 109.49 - 55913 7/28/2005 001942 DATA TICKET INC. _ 11975 May Pkg Cite Process Fee - -- - - 10-140-255-000-000 - - - 100:00 - Total : 100.00 55914 7/28/2005 002082 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLIES D04764950101 C. Care supplies 10-440-228-000-000 43.64 D04765020102 C.care supplies __ - --- -- - - -- -- - - 10-440-228-000-000 - - 280 5' 3 D04765040101 C. Care supplies - 10-440-228-000-000 96.33 D04765090101 C. Care supplies 10-440-228-000-000 211.79 D04765110101 C. Care supplies 10-440-228-000-000- 499.45 . Total : 1,131.74 55915 7/28/2005 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 5835 June Lawn Care-22293 Barton 34-700-767-000-000 40.00 Total : 40.00 55916 7/26/2005 002187 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP. 0018016. 1761 Paint.mixer 10-450-246-000-000 7.12 00180162455 Paint supplies 10-450,245-000-000 12.09 00180162569 Paint supplies 10-450-246-000-000 8.12 Total : 27.33 55917 7/28/2005 010518 FRANCIS, BETTY J. 07182005 Refund DMV ticket charge - 10-500-07 - 80.00 } Page: 2' vchlist \ Voucher List Page: _ 3 ' 07-/25/2005 10:51:45AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55917 7/28/2005 010518 FRANCIS, BETTY J. (Continued) Total : 80.00. 55918 7/28/2005 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 32073154 Irrigation valve box 10-180-245-000-000 48.62 Total : 48.62 55919 7/28/2005 002901 G.-T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4456-AD June Install Dinner& Luncheon 10-110-270-000-000 58.00 10-180-270-000-000 33.00 Total : 91.00 55920- 7/28/2005 010175 GOLLIHAR, JEFF 07052005 _ ' Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-370-139-000-000 288.22 Total : 288.22 55921 7/28/2005 010181 GOPHER PATROL June, 2005 June Parks Gopher Control - - 10-450-245-000-000 445.00 10-190-719-000-000 45.00 Total : 490.00 55922 7/28/2005 010039 GREER OWENS, BARRIE 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-180-139-000-000 291.37 Total : 291.37 55923 7/28/2005 003152 HARPER & BURNS LLPN June, 2005 June legal services 10-160-250-000-000 2,973.75 Total : 2,973.75 55924 7/28/2005 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 3981988-00 Irrigation supplies 10-180-245-000-000 92.61 Total : 92.61 55925 7/28/2005 010124 JACKSON, CANDICE 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-1397000=000 62.18 Total : 62.18 55926 7/28/2005 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 40186/41216 Jan & Mar Web Hosting Fee 10-180-255-000-000 150.00 Page: 3 vchlist _ _ __ _ _ ouche�_Cist - 07/25/2005---1'0:51:45ATA T CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank-code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55926 7/28/2005 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC (Continued) 40187 Jan. Eden Server Payment 10-140-701-000-000 291.32 42034 March Eden support 10-140-250-000-000 427.50 42036 HP 4100N Duplexer unit 10-140-219-000-000 103.91 - 10-140-210-000-000- 187.02 42038 March Eden support 10-140-250-000-000 285.00 42040 Install PIX 501, set up&configure 10-140-701-000-000 • 803.46 - 42049 UPG Office 2003 Std - 10-140-210-000-000 230.59 43244 2 power supplys - 10=380-249-000-000 75.43 Total : 2,554.23 55927 7/28/2005 010414 LEWIS, JENNIFER 07052005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 462.29 Total : 462.29, 55928 7/28/2005 010357 LINDBLAD, JENNIFER 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 277.27 Total : 277.27 55929 7/28/2005 010367 LOMA LINDA UNIV. HEALTH CARE 07062005 May employee physicals 10-190-224-000-000 108.00 Total : 108.00 55930 7/28/2005 010013 MAURICIO, VERA 07052005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-130-000-000 105.57 Total : 106.57 55931 7/28/2005 004620 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 7FW59001-June June EOC phone charges 10-808-235-000-000 38.78 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 07/25/2005 10:51:45AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55931 7/28/2005 004620 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Total : 38.78 55932 7/28/2005 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025-034 May/June cell phones 10-440-235-000-000 49.44 10-180-240-000-000 310.13 Total : 369.57 55933 7/28/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 611460 Balance due-furniture 10-120-210-000-000 346.69 627147 CREDIT-NONRETURN INV.#97952947 10-120-210-000-000 -10:97 Total :, 335.72 55934 7/28/2005 005663 PRECIE, DENNICE 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 238.39 - Total : 238.39 55935 7/28/2005 010208 RATELLE, DAZE&ASSOCIATES June, 2005 June consulting services - 34-400-251-000-000 1,860.00 Total : 1,860.00 55936 7/28/2005 010171 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1400 - June Signal Maint 16-510-255=000-000 362.25 Total : 362.25 55937 7/28/2005 006341 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. June, 2005 June Financial Admin 34-400-251-000-000 400.00 - - Total : 400.00 55938 7/28/2005 006453 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER 1745 June Booking Fees 10-410-259-000-000 1,756.92 Total : 1,766.92 55939 7/28/2005 006531 S.B. COUNTY_ SHERIFF 5947- Station Clk reclass Jan-June 10-410-256-000-000 1,635.94 5947a 3rd Qtr Gen Srvs Exp 10-410-256-000-000 167.03 Page: 5 —vcMlist _ Voucher List_ 07/25/2005-'f0:5'�45AM _ CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55939 7/28/2005 '006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF (Continued) 5947b 3rd Qtr Overtime 10-410-250-000-000 3,162.36 Total: 41965.33 55940 7/28/2005 006565 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN S187380608A Landscape worker ad 10-120-230-000-000 216.68 ---Total-: 216:68- 55941 7/28/2005 006435 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 36661 May animal shelter services 10-190-256-000=000 636.50 Total : 636.50 55942 7/28/2005 006614- SCHWAB; THOMAS- "07182005- Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-120-139-000-000 208.22 Total : 208.22 55943 7/28/2005 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY June, 2005 June Natural Gas 10-190-238-000-000 127.31 10-440-238-000-000 38.96 10-805=238-000-000 16.32 Total : 182.59 55944 7/28/2005 010037 TORRES, GREGORY W. 07182005 Medical Reimbursement Benefit 10-180-139-000-000 160.00 Total : 160.00 -55945 7/28/2005 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 2005060286 June Dig Alert Services - 16-900-220-000-000 42.00 Total : 42.00 55946 7/28/2005 010421 VILLAGE ENTERPRISES, DARCY MCNAB 05-37 June consulting services 10-180-255-000-000 155.00 Total : 155.00 55947 7/28/2005 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 239766 June Pest Control Page: 6 vchlist Boucher List Page: 7 -07125/2005 10:51:45AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55947 7/28/2005 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO (Continued) 34-400-246-000-000 35.50 10-180-245-000-000 80.00 10-805-245-000-000 30.50 10-440-245-000-000 68.50- Total : 214.60 55948 7/28/2005 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 010928485 June lease&4th Qtr copies 10-190-700-000-000 456.94 Total : 456.94 45 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 27,955.66 45 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 27,955.65 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. 0-1—f�� Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 7 -- --- -------------Voucher List--------------------- ------------- - vc is------ -- -- - -- Page: 1 07/25/2005 11:33:20AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account, Amount 55899 7/11/2005 001685 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 07012005 2005/06 Liability&Work Comp Deposit 10-190-260-000-000 79,456.00 Total : 79,456.00 55901 7/14/2005 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 08 0176 8 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 48.53 _ 10-440-220-000-000 77.54 Total : 126.07 55902 7/18/2005 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN July, 2005 July Council&Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 400.00 55905 7/22/2005 010147 CORTES, BEA 07212005 Monterey Travel Advance 10-110-270-000-000 150.00 Total : 150.00 55906 7/25/2005 001666- CA. MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC 07252005 8/11 CMTA Mtq-L. Ronnow 10-140-268-000-000 25.00 Total : 25.00 55949 7/28/2005 001024 ACCENT PRINT& DESIGN 250593 PRINTING 10-805-222-000-000 90.51 Total : 90.51 55950 7/28/2005 001391 BERRY, STEVE 07192005 Reimburse July 6-8, 2005 Conf. 10-180-270-000-000 409.49 Total : 409.49 55951 7/28/2005 010340 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, PERS-CH 0015720001 HEALTH INS B CORTES 10-110-142-000-000 373.40 Total : 373.40 55952 7/28/2005 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 137381 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000=000 263.97 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/25/2005 11:33:20AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55952 7/28/2005 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY (Continued) 137446 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 425.35 137454 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 35.93 Total : 725.25 55953 7/28/2005 010147 CORTES, BEA July, 2005 July Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 = 10-110-120-000-000 189.00 Total : 339.00 55954 7/28/2005 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 15 0166 5E CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 69.35 10-440-220-000-000 51.49 Total : 120.8.4 55955 7/28/2005 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 7285/8024427 Park maint 10-450-246-000-000 44.52 Total : 44.52 55956 7/28/2005 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA July, 2005 July Council and.Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 - 250.00 Total : 400.00 55957 7/28/2005 002760 G & R REFRIGERATION 36059 Service freezer-c. care 10-440-246-000-000 133.01 Total : 133.01 55958 7/28/2005 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4456-AD1 BLUE MT OUTLOOK 10-125-213-000-000 620.00 Total : 620.00 55959 7/28/2005 002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN July, 2005 July Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 218.65 Page: 2 vchlist Voucheft-is - - - - —Page----3-- - -07/25/2005--11-:33:20AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55959 7/28/2005 .002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN (Continued) Total : 368.65 55960 7/28/2005' 002835 GIBSON DISCOUNT 99467 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 20.46 Total : 20.46 55961 7/28/2005 003213 HONEYWELL ACS SERVICE 3230438 1st-2nd Qtr FiVAC 10-805-246-000-000 1,241.00 10-440-246-000-000 1,241..00 Total : 2,482.00 55962 7/28/2005 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 3988963-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 ` 131.39 - - _ Total : 131.39 55963 7/28/2005 003850 JANI-KING 07050073 BUILDING CLEANING 10-440-244-000-000 815.00 Total : 816.00 55964 7/28/2005 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE 5559630-Augusl HEALTH INS-LEE ANN GARCIA 10-110-142-000-000 265.43 10-110-120-000-000 31.35 Total : 296.78 55965 7/28/2005 010446 MILLER, JIM July, 2005 July Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 -Total : 400.00 55966 7/28/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 566555 Office supplies 10-140-210-000-000 24.31 603962 Office supplies 10-120-210-000-000 57.93 Total : 82.24 55967 7/28/2005 005586 PETTY CASH 07192005 Reimburse petty cash 10-440-223-000-000 120.26 10-440-228-000-000 15.92 Page: 3 vchlist �,.f„her List Page: 4 07/25/2005 11:33:20AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55967 7/28/2005 005586 PETTY CASH (Continued) Total : 136.18 55968 7/28/2005 005688 PROTECTION ONE 31891344-1st ALARM MONITORING 10-180-247-000-000 08.85 Total : 98.85 55969 7/28/2005 005673 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 24980301-001 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 10-180-240-000-000 898.64 Total : 898.64 55970 7/28/2005 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 44807 Office supplies 10-180-210-000-000 50.42. 91402 Office supplies 10-172-210-000-000 141.41 10-140-210-000-000 11.95 Total : 203.78 55971 7/28/2005 010517 SWING'S COMMUNICATION 1 Install 1{cable&2 jacks 10-380-249=000-000 169.97 Total : 169.97 55972 7/28/2005 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A.. 507130567 5 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000- 505.70 507130568 3 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 , 40.02 Total : 545.72 7/14/2005 007400- U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. July, 2005 LEASE PAYMENTS 33-300-206-000-000 22,960.52 Total : 22,960.52 30 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 113,023.27 3Q Vouchers in this report Total vouchers :. 113,023.27 I certify, that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community"Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finan a Director ---- --- --Voucher List Page: 1 _ 07/26/2005 5:46:12PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55898 7/11/2005 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 070105 PERS FOR PAYROLL END 71 05 10-022-62-00 11,366.53 Total : 11,366.53 55900 7/14/2005 010164 GREAT-WEST annual schwab DEF COMP SCHWAB. 10-022-63-00 7,374.02- Total-: 7,374.02 55904 7/20/2005 010079 CASH 07 20 05 PURCHASE OF PROPERTY 32-600-213-000-000 408,658.00 Total : 408,658.00 55975 7/26/2005 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 07 15 05 PERS FOR PAYROLL_ END 7 15 05 - 10-022-62-00 12,073.30 Total : 12,073.30 4 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 439,471.85 1 4 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 439,471.85 I certify, that, to the best of my knowledge", the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director -, Page: 1 vchlist 'Voucher List Page: 1 08/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55974 7/25/2005 001206 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION July, 2005 July VISA expenses 23-200-12-00 54.83 10-172=210-000-000 10.96 10-370-268-000-000 399.00. 32-200-210-000-000 17.95 Total : 482.74 55976 7/28/2005 010425 GRAND TERRACE MARTIAL ARTS July, 2005 July Martial Arts Class 10-430-27 1,347.50 Total : 1,347.50 55977 7/28/2005 010524 ONE STEP AHEAD 07272005 C. Care gate fence-infant area 23-200-_14-00 231.95 Total : 231.95 55978 7/28/2005 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 11 0249 3 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES - 10-440-220-000-000 147.49 Total : 147.49 55979 8/2/2005 010453 RUIZ, DEBRA 082205 BIRTHDAY BONUS . -10-440_-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55980 8/2/2005 006614 SCHWAB, THOMAS 081705 BIRTHDAY BONUS 10-120-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55981 8/2/2005 010101 CORDERO, DINO RAH- �081105 BIRTHDAY BONUS 10-440-110-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55983 8/11/2005 001074 A.E P SEP-49 2005/06 Membership-G. Koontz 10-370-265-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 55984 8/11/2005 001001 AA EQUIPMENT CO. INC. 09 7338225 REPAIR & PURCHASE 10-450-246-000-000 26.94 Page: 1 --vchlist2------ 08/04/2005 - 1:5055PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55984 8/1'1/2005 001001 AA EQUIPMENT CO. INC. (Continued) 09 7338311 REPAIR & PURCHASE 10-450-246-000-000 208.76 Total : 236.70 55985 8/11/2005 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW July, 2005 July Planning Comm Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55986 8/11/2005 001156 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 145736-052905 APA Membership-G. Koontz 10-370-265-000-000. 230.00 Total : 230.00 _ -_5598T 8/11/2005 010084 - BIDNEY, ROBERT - July; 2005 July Planning Comm Stipend - 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55988 8/11/2005 001745 CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRESS 08022005 Renewal-Plan. Commissioner's Journal 10-370-274-000-000 95.00 Total : 95.00 55989 8/11/2005 001840 COLTON, CITY OF 000478 ANIMAL CONTROL CODE ENFORCEMENT 10-190-256-000-000 3,291:66 Total : 3,291.66 55990 8/11/2005 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM July, 2005 July Planning Comm Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 55991 8/11/2005 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B836355 PUBLIC'HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER - 10-370-230-000-000 123.00 B838990 PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER 10-370-230-000-000 59.86 B846343 PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER 10-370-230-000-000 78.72 Total : 261.58 55992 8/11/2005 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 021944/401132( Playsand Page: 2 vchlist wucher List Page: 3 08/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55992 8/1112005 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 (Continued) _ 10-440-245-000-000 37.50 021 944/401 1 32( SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 16.75 10-180-245-000-000 1.30 025477/002565,e SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 54.07 Total : 109.62 55993 8/11/2005 002276 ESSCO-GRAND TERRACE INC. 2401884-00 Brass cover plates 10-180-245-000-000 244.92 Total : 244.92 55994 8/11/2005 002280 EVER READY EMBROIDERY 974419 VOLUNTEER GIFTS 10-125-222-000-000 1,735.00 10-125-222-000-000 134.46 Total : 1,869.46, -55995 8/11/2005 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 32073360 SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 16.41 32073391 SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 16.70 32073567 SUPPLIES 16-900-254-000-000 126.57 32073771 SUPPLIES 10-450-246-000-000 78.31 375988 R3 SUPPLIES 1-0-450-246-000-000 33.80 Total : 271.79 55996 8/11/2005 002835 GIBSON DISCOUNT 99504 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 161.59 Total : 161.59 55997 8/11/2005 010175 GOLLIHAR, JEFF 07262005 Reimburse training mileage 10-370-268-000-000 80.19 Page: 3 ---vchiist Voucher-List ----_--____-- P-age:_---4 68704/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55997, 8/11/2005 010175 GOLLIHAR, JEFF (Continued) Total : 80.19 55998 8/11/2005 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN 07192005 2005/06 Life Ins-Hilkey 10-110-142-000-000 1,800.00 Total : 1,800.00 55999 8/11/2005 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 4028068-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES _ __ 10-450-245-000-000_ 161.74 Total : _ 161.74 56000 8/11/2005 003850 JANI-KING 07050085 CLEANING SERVICES _ 34-400-246-000-000 150.00 Total : 150.00 56001 8/11/2005 003867 K. D. SALES 142517 SUPPLIES 10-440-245-000-000 39.32 Total : 39.32 56002 8/11/2005 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 3727 LAWNMOWER REPAIRS 10-180-246-000-000 73.27 Total : 73.27 56003 8/11/2005 010107 MCGRATH'S CATERING E05345 GT BAR B Q ' 23-200-12-00 1,465.00 23-200-12-00 113.54 Total : 1,578.54 56004 8/11/2005 004620 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 64447976 July phone charges 10-805-235-000-000 35.37 10-190-235-000-000 39.06 10-450-235-000-000 17.04 10-440-235-000-000 366.51 Total : 457.98 56005. 8/11/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 852299 Xerox paper 10-190-212-000-000 111.64 Page: 4 vchlist Becher List Page: 5 08/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice " Description/Account Amount 56005 8/11/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY (Continued) 880003 Office supplies 10-140-210-000-000 - 1.47 10-190-210-000-000 59.80 10-140-210-000-000 0.11 10-190-21.0-000-000 4.64 907976 Toner cartridge 10-172-210-000-000 83.09 Total : 260.75 56006 8/11/2005 005450 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SAU06425V805 ELEVATOR MAINT 10-180-245-000-000 286.60 Total : 286.60 56007 8/11/2005 005586 PETTY CASH 08012005 _Reimburse petty cash 10-440-220-0007000 22:83 10-440-221-000-000 55.42 10-440-223-000-000 106.53 10-440-228-_000-000 '82�25 Total : 267.03 56008 8/11/2005 006310 ROADRUNNER STORAGE 1559-Aug. Aug. Storage 10-140-241-000-000 89.00 Total : 89.00 56009 8/11/2005 006335 ROQUET PAVING INC. 0516-05 Sink hole repair-Van B/Reed 16-900-260-000-000 1,830.00 0516-6 Sink hold repair-Michigan n/o Pico - 16-900-260-000-000 4,856.00 Total : 6,686.00 56010 8/11/2005 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 6038 July Law Enforcement 10-410-255-000-000 3,361.50 10-410-256-000-000 102,637.80 14-411-256-000-000 6,050.70 6038a July grant-funded deputy 14-411-256-000-000 14,863.00 Page: 5 --vchli _ --- Voucher List _ - ---- -- - -------•---- Page:- --6--- 08/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND'TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56010 8/11/2005 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF (Continued) Total : 126,913.00 56011 8/11/2005 005529 SBC CALIFORNIA July, 2005 July phone charges 10-440-235-000-000 16.29 10-190-235-000-000 14.79 Total : 31.08 56012 8/11/2005 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY -July, 2005 July_Electricity - - 10-190-238-000-000 5,113.73 10-450-238-000-000 665.33 16-510-238-000-000 320.34 10-190-719-000-000 2.31 10-440-238-000-000 1,833.65 34-400-238-000-000 125.02 10-175-238-000-000 45.46 10-172-238-000-000 _ 56.82 15-500=601-000-000 21.85 10-805-238-000-000 1,336.32 Total : 9,520.83 56013 8/11/2005 010525 STANART, LORI 6032 Left C. Care program w/credit 10-44028 57.84 Total : 57.84 56014 8/11/2005 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 9154056364 Office supplies 10-370-210-000-000 148.90 9155099712 Office supplies 10-370-210-000-000 68.45 Total : 217.35 56015 8/11/2005 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 5070603542 FOOD SUPPLIES - 10440-220-000-000 441.58 5070731947 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 46.31 5071424658 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-2.20-000-000 3.91 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 08/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56015 8/11/2005 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. (Continued) 5072005639 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 440.56 5072705576 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 515.58 5072705584 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 55.86 Total : 1,503.80 56016 8/11/2005 010091 TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS 1944378-0 July phone charges 10-190-235-000-000 1,048.19 Total : 1,048.19 56017 8/11/2005 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 2005070284 DIG ALERT MONTHLY SERVICE 16-900-220-000-000 44.95 Total : 44.95 56018 8/11/2005 007795 WAXIE 69027448 03 SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 86.85 Total : 86.85 56019 8/11/2005 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 70-078239-4 C. Care termite treatment 10-440-245-000-000 324.00 Total : 324.00 56020 8/11/2005 007905 WHITLEY, BRIAN July, 2005 July Planning Comm Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56021 8/11/2005 007925 WILSON, DOUG July, 2005 July Planning Comm Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56022 8/11/2005 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 011502068 COPIER USAGE 10-190-700-000-000 318.22 Total : 318.22 47 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 161,477.53 Page: 7 _vchli _ _ Voucher List - ---------- ------------ ------ - -- 013/04/2005 1:50:55PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 47 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 161,477.53 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 8 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 08/04/2005 2:38:04PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 55973 7/25/2005 001206 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION June, 2005 June VISA expenses 10-110-270-000-000 4,776.62 10-120-210-000-000 72.00 10-120-270-000-000 1,111.23 10-180-270-000-000 14.33 10-440-228-000-000 25.04 Total : 5,999.22 55982 8/3/2005 010506 COURTSHIP STORIES 07252005 Sr. Ctr Story 10-180-255-000-000 75.00 Total : 76.00 56023 8/11/2005 010376 ARCADIS G & M INC. 0115570 June services 32-600-208-000-000 264.92 Total : 264.92 56024 8/11/2005 010523 BONUS, MARINA 07192005 C. Care refund 10-440-28 118.50 Total : 118.50 56025 8/11/2005 001713 CA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 171092 1-215 signal maint/energy 16-510-238-000-000 196.00 Total : 196.00 56026 8/11/2005 001742 CHAGOLLA CONSTRUCTION, ROBERT 393 Retention extras 34-700-750-000-000 879.50 394 Retention-11891 Preston 34-700-750-000-000 17,140.00 Total : 18,019.50 56027 8/11/2005 010403 CITY OF REDLANDS AR111897 June CNG fuel 10-180-272-000-000 69.11 34-800-272-000-000 15.12 Total : 84.23 56028 8/11/2005 010147 CORTES, BEA 08012005 Reimburse Membership-NALEO 10-190-265-000-000 100.00 Page: 1 vchlist oucher Lis -1--- -- --- __-- -----Page:----2------, -08/0412005-2:38:04PM _ CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56028 8/11/2005 01.0147 CORTES, BEA (Continued) Total : 100.00 56029 8/11/2005 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 12093 June parking cite process fee 10-140-255-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 56030 8/11/2005 010522 DOUGLAS, MICHELLE 07272005 C.'Care refund 10-440-23 - 234:17 Total : 234.17 -56031 8/11/2005 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 5890 Apr/May/June Rollins Pk Maint 10-450-245-000-000 1,740.00 Total : 1,740.00 56032 8/11/2005 010055 EMPIRE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS 2005.84 June Consulting 32-600-205-000-000 580.00 32-600-208-000-000 580.00 Total : 1,160.00 56033 8/11/2005 003152 HARPER-& BURNS LLPN May, 2005 May professional services 10-160-250-000-000 3,232.50 Total ; 3,232.50 56034 8/11/2005 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 60008 Eden support-VPN 10-140-255-000-000 380.00 Total : 380.00 56035 8/11/2005 005670 PRESS ENTERPRISE 757670-03 G.T. Days Ad 23-200-12-00 122.40 Total : 122.40 56036 8/11/2005 006435 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 36708-June June animal shelter srvs 10-190-256-000-000 495.00 36114 Oct. Animal Shelter Srvc 10-190-256-000-000 398.00 Total : 893.00 56037 8/11/2005 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 0529 June professional services Page: 2 vchlist �'1-1(cher List Page: 3 08/04/2005 2:38:04PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE — Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56037 8/11/2005 001034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING (Continued= 44-200-622-000-00.0 1,355.00 529a June prof. services 10-180-255-000-000 172.50 529b June Prof. Services 10-370-255-000-000 948.00 Total : 2,475.60 56038 8/11/2005 007920 WILLDAN 062-8064 June Plan Review/Insp 10-172-250-000-000 2,256.60 34-400-251-000-000 - 1,190.00 062-8065 June Engineering Srvs 10-172-250-000-000 3,467.50 Total : 6,914.10 56039 8/11/2005 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS June, 2005 June bottled water 10-190-238-000-000 211.36 10-440-238-000-000 121.16 34-400-238-000-000 11.90 10-805-238-000-000 41.65 Total : 386.06 56040 8/11/2005 007995 ZUG, RICHARD 07152005 Spring '05 Weed Abatement 34-700-710-000-000 85.00 34-700-767-000-000 85.00 34-700-765-000-000 85.00 - 34-700-777-000-000 85.00 34-700-709-000-000 85.00 34-700-780-000-000 85.00 07182005 Spring 2005 Weed Abatement 10-805-245-000-000 240.00 10-450-245-000-000 - 85.00 10-1 80 245-000-000- 90.00 Total : 925.00 20 Vouchers for bank code : bofa Bank total : 43,420.10 Page: 3 —vchlis _ V_ouc_er iS -- -- ,- ----- - - --P_age:—-- 4------ 08/04/200. -2:38:04PIU, CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 20 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 43,420.10 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and-are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 4 C. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUMC-0th CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-JULY 14, 2005 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace, California,on July 14, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor Bea Cortes, Mayor Pro Tern Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Jim Miller, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow,Finance Director Jerry Glander,Building& Safety Director Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department ABSENT: Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Pastor Rick Doucette,Calvary,The Brook Church followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Herman Hilkey. ITEMS TO DELETE -None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Martial Arts Program Awards Assistant City Manager Berry, introduced Tammy Lawrence, the Martial Arts Program Instructor. Tammy Lawrence, introduced the students that are going to be testing for new belts. She indicated that they will be having an award banquet on Tuesday, July 26 and invited the Council to attend. 2B. Home of Distinction Award Assistant Cijy Managerrry, announced that Gary Muray is the winner of the Home of Distinction Award for this quarter. (-M)"U�� , A E-�9DA 6'k EBA N010 J j Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2005-68 MOTIONBY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES ABSTAINED), to approve the following Consent Calendar Items with the removal of items of 3B.,3E., and 3F.: 3A. Approve Check Register Dated July 14, 2005 3C. Waive.Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3D. Approval of 06-23-2005 Minutes 3G. Continuing Appropriations for FY 05-06 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3B. Ratify 07-14-2005 CRA Action Councilmember Hilkey requested clarification on a procedural issue. He indicated that if the Agency has a closed session item that is postponed until after the City Council Meeting it only seems appropriate not to Ratify the CRA Action until after the Closed Session has taken place. He requested comments from City Attorney Harper regarding this issue. 3E. Reject Liability Claim-Jewkes 3F. Reject Liability Claim-Palafox CC-2005-69 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER 'HIT-KEY, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES ABSTAINED), to I approve the remaining consent calendar items: 3E. Reject Liability Claim- Jewkes 3F. Reject Liability Claim-Palafox PUBLIC COMMENT Don Hallwachs, 12581 Mirado Avenue, indicated that it is his hope that the Council will continue the endorsement of the Soccer and the Little League as the benefactors for the selling of Safe and Sane Fireworks in Grand Terrace. He stated that this is the primary fundraiser for both organizations and without it they wouldn't be able to provide the equipment needed to maintain the fields, they wouldn't be able to provide scholarships for those who are unable to pay the fees and they may not be able to provide the youth recreational programs provided to the City. Barne, Ky arge , 11668 Bernardo Way,stated that the residents don't know what CRA Action Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 3 is ratified if the Council does not say. He stated that the library is in direct competition with local businesses in Grand Terrace with the rental of videos and tapes. He feels that the library is for reading books and newspapers and a place to do research not for movie rentals. He doesn't understand why the City wants a larger library. Bill Hays, 22114 De Berry Street, stated the following: A few meetings ago, Mr. Harper said that you don't have to disclose negotiations on real estate deals done in closed sessions until after escrow closes. Mr.Harper stated it was in the Brown Act. He requested that Mr. Harper give the chapter and verse. They have been unable to locate the section. He questioned if there are now more tax allocation bonds in the works or have any more been issued since the$13,000,000. He stated that according to Mr. Schwab's comments in the press,the City is going to have a shortfall on the budget of around $2,000,000 or more. He questioned how the Council intends to make up the shortage. He stated that he believes that the time limit has passed for the OAC revision and requested that they share the Market study with the voters. He stated that they know from the press that the Market study has been presented to the City in a bullet point presentation. He stated that Mayor Ferre excused herself from participating in the discussion and voting on the Metropolitan Water District issue at a past council meeting because her son worked for BBK, who is the General Counsel for the District and questioned why she didn't do the same for the OAC because BBK is a consultant for the OAC. City Manager Schwab,he stated that staff did receive comments on fireworks both positive and negative. He plans to bring back the.issue of Fireworks to Council for discussion in September.He state that the only action item on the CRA Agenda is the 06-23-2005 Minutes and that is the action that the Council is ratifying. He indicated that the issue Councilmember Hilkey brought up was what do you do when a Closed Session item is heard at the end of the meeting once they have already ratified the CRA Action. He stated that libraries are very different than they use to be. There is,a high demand for internet access and they would like to increase the internet access for patrons,they would like a quiet room and a children's section. He stated that they do have a lot of DVD's and a large section on books on tape. He responded that he doesn't believe the City has any tax allocation bonds in the portfolio. The City Council has just approved a budget and there was no shortfall and is unaware of the article Mr. Hays is referring to. He stated that staff will be sharing the Market study for the OAC with the Council in August. Councilmember Miller,stated that he would like to see an incident report on what happened in town on July 4'. He requested a breakdown on the groups or organizations that participate in the sale of safe and sane fireworks,how much they raise and what they spend the money on. City Manager Schwab, indicated that he is doing some statistical work with the City of Highland and Loma Linda,who do not allow fireworks, on what type of activity went on in Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 4 their communities. He stated that there must have been a change of the availability on illegal fireworks. He will have more to report in September. Cynthia Bidney, 12219 Pascal, stated that she is concerned about the Town Square Project but even more concerned about the older children in the community. She feels that there is nothing for the older children in the community to do, there aren't any programs available. She would like to see programs grow and questioned why the City isn't looking into a YMCA or a Boys Club. She stated that it is hard to keep the kids safe and on the right track. She would like to see something for the kids incorporated when talking about these large proj ects. ORAL REPORTS 5A. Committee Reports 1. Crime Prevention Committee a. Minutes of 06-13-2005 CC-2005-70 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the June 13, 2005 Minutes of the Crime Prevention Committee. 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of 06-07-2005 CC-2005-71 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the June 7, 2005 Minutes of the Emergency Operations Committee. COUNCIL REPORTS I Councilmember Hilkey, stated that he was at a soccer tournament in Cypress and took pictures of a peak generator plant and shared them with the Council. He requested clarification on the assignments and hours of the Sheriff Service Specialist. He suggested changing the message on the phone so that callers know whether she is here or not and when she will be available. He suggested that we change the wording on the Agenda to "Ratify the Community Redevelopment Agency Action Taken." He appreciates the comments on library, he has also observe that half of the library is video tapes and DVD's, however we don't have any input on the library. He hears someone asking for the City to provide guidance for the children and for the City to take care of the children more. He feels that it is not the City's job. Those communities that have a lot of programs for the kids have other problems that Grand Terrace doesn't have. He doesn't feel as though it is a City issue. Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 5 Councilmember Garcia,thanked Cynthia for her comments. She would like to have a Youth Action Plan and get young people engaged. It is the parents responsibility,however she feels that there is a way that parents can share information. She requested information on the Concert in the Park. Assistant CiIy Manager Berry, stated that there will be a summer concert in the Park on September 16`h at Rollins Park. The Riverside Concert Band will be performing. Bring a Picnic, blankets and chairs to enjoy the old fashioned home town free event. They are looking for underwriters to support this event. Flyers are out and he encourages everyone to attend. Councilmember Garcia, reported that she along with Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem attended the Public Hearing put on by Omnitrans regarding Omnilink. They had an interactive public hearing. Assistant CitesManager Beny,indicated that staff has been in contact with Omnitrans since the hearing and it looks like they will be cancelling the Omnilink service in September. Access route will continue. A map should be included in the next BMO. Councilmember Garcia, stated that we provide as much information as possible on the website and that there is a Omnitrans link for anyone who would like further information. She welcomed backed City Manager Schwab. Councilmember Miller, reported that the Chamber will be hosting their annual golf tournament on August 26, 2005 and encouraged everyone to participate in that event. He requested more information on the exclusive Negotiation Agreement that we have with Grand Terrace Partners. He questioned if there is an automatic extension and has the City received all of the items listed in the agreement and when they will be presented to the Council. City Manager Schwab, stated that the City has received the deliverables that they were required to provide and that it will be brought to the Council in August. Councilmember Miller, questioned if the agreement is automatically extended. City Manager Schwab, stated that he would have to review the ENA but he believes that if they meet their goals the extension is automatic. Councilmember Miller,stated that there are other developers interested in the project and he wants to make sure that they met their deadline. Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 6 Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, thanked Mr. Hallwachs and stated that she supports organizations that have fundraisers and scholarships. She stated that she invited Dave Nunez to give a brief follow-up on what took place on July 4`h David Nunez, Battalion Chief San Bernardino County Fire, stated that San Bernardino County Fire takes a very proactive stance on fireworks. They brought on the paid call firefighters to man the second engine in Grand Terrace. The paid call firefighters put in 163 total man hours over the 41h of July weekend in the City of Grand Terrace alone. The station handled approximately 20 call during the weekend for assistance for anything from fires to medical aids and investigations. Theyprovided one of the fire investigators to Grand Terrace to patrol and be highly visible. They confiscated 100 lbs worth of illegal fireworks. No citations were issued. There were additional chief officers that were brought in to oversee I the management of the area. There were a couple of fires small in nature. We were fortunate that there was a high level of humidity. There were no major accidents or incidents in the City. Councilmember Garcia,questioned if the Sheriff's Department and Fire Department worked together. Mr. Nunez, responded in the affirmative. The Sheriff's Arson Bomb Detail worked along with the Fire Investigation Division. Grand Terrace is not an isolated City that had illegal fireworks or legal fireworks. This year was quite unusual compared to previous years. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, questioned if Lt. Guerra had any comments to add. Lt.Guerra,San Bernardino County Sheriff s Department,stated that the Department worked in conjunction with the Fire Department on a lot of the enforcement efforts. He indicated that he will provide detailed information regarding the activities in other areas and what has caused the perceived increase activity of illegal fireworks. There was a slight increase in calls for service regarding illegal fireworks and did very similar patrols as the Fire Department. They were visible and informed people of the legal and illegal use.of fireworks. j In most cases the citizens were unaware that they were using illegal fireworks and were willing to comply with instructions. There were a few cases that they had to confiscate them. No citations were issued and there were no arrests. They took a friendly approach to the situation as in the past. They have the ability and can take additional enforcement efforts. Mayor Ferr6, reported that she attended along with other Councilmembers the installation Dinner for the Chamber of Commerce and reported who the new officers are as well as the Board of Directors. She felt that it was a very nice event. She stated that in response to the Best, Best, and Krieger Law Firm, it is a very large firm employing over 100 attorneys in 3 different offices in the State of California. She stated that she is not aware of Best,Best,and Krieger being involved in the OAC and if they are that is fine. She stated that her son is i Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 7 General Counsel for the a Municipal Water Company and when the water company came before the Council it would have been very legal for her to vote,however, so that there was no look of impropriety she excused herself. Councilmember Hilkey, stated that Omnitrans is mainly funded by the Gas Tax. Grand Terrace is suppose to get part of that tax. He stated that Grand Terrace does not seem to use public.transportation. The Access Program is required and feels that they should promote that program better so that more people who need it know about it. He feels that there is no simple solution and wished Councilmember Garcia luck. PUBLIC HEARING 6A. Street Cut Policy and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Establishing Fines for Failure to Obtain a Street Cut Permit and Failure to Perform Street Cut Construction in Accordance to the Specifications as Described in the Specifications for Construction within the Public Right of Way. CC-2005-72 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES,SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0,to continue the Public Hearing for Street Cut Policy and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Establishing Fines for Failure to Obtain a Street Cut Permit and Failure to Perform Street Cut Construction in Accordance to the Specifications as Described in the Specifications for Construction within the Public Right of Wayuntil August 11,2005 and direct staff to meet with the inter utility coordinating council in a workshop and to bring this item back to Council with recommendations. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None NEW BUSINESS 8A. Non-owner Occupied/Rental Property Program Assistant City Manager Berry,reported that the purpose of the Non-Owner Occupied/Rental Property is three fold: 1. To clean up sub-standard rental stock 2. To improve the quality of life in neighborhoods 3. To maintain or increase the economic value of single-family homes and other rental residences. The steps to accomplish this goal includes developing,passing,and implementing anew city ordinance that would, in part: 0 Contain an inspection process for all non-owner occupied/rental property Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 8 • Include an enforcement process • Impose fines for violations and non-compliance on property owners • Establish a working database for all rental property • Be financially self-supporting Staff feels that a well conceived, implementation of such a plan, would benefit the City of Grand Terrace with: • Increased property values for both rental and non-rental property • Increased rental demand • Increased property management involvement in solving rental property issues • Decreased general call for police services • Decreased call about rental property problems to Code Enforcement i It is the intent of this program to address condition that pose immediate hazards or which clearly present a threat to human life, health or safety and will require full and rapid compliance. Significant Code violations that do not pose immediate hazards to human life, health or safety will be subject to full compliance proceedings. However, reasonable time periods shall be established for achieving compliance. Minor Code violations that relate primarily to superficial or preventative,property maintenance may be cited. But primarily will be noted and transmitted to the property owner. In accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Codes, City of Grand Terrace Codes, and various other Housing and Building codes,it is not the intent of this Program to require mandatory retrofits of existing structures that were built or installed in accordance with building standards in effect at the time of construction or installation and in which have been maintained in a good and safe condition, unless the retrofitting is required by ordinance as adopted by the City of Grand Terrace, or by State law. The provisions of this Program shall apply to only non-owner occupied, residential rental properties. Mobile home rental units located within mobile home parks, nursing, j convalescent or retirement homes which are otherwise subject to inspections by other agencies including but not limited to the County Environmental Health Services, the State Department of and Community Development, or the State Department of Social Services, are exempt from this program. He gave an overview of the program and the fees that would be involved. He also stated that the actual costs to implement this program are unknown and gave an overview of the potential costs and manpower needs. He indicated that staff is seeking direction from Council and authorization to proceed with the Non-Owner Occupied/Rental Property Program. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes,questioned if the City will be charging an annual fee like the County I ' I Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 9 of San Bernardino does. Assistant City Manager Berry,stated that we would not have a base fee,it would be per unit. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes,indicated that the County of San Bernardino charges for a certificate of use and questioned if Grand Terrace would do the same? Assistant City Manager Berry,responded in the negative. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes,questioned what other cities charge for their inspection program who have implemented similar programs. Assistant Cijy Manager Berry, stated that there are a number of cities that have a rental program and gave a brief overview of what their fees are. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that he is all for the Program. He questioned if condominiums are part of the program. Assistant City Manager Berry,responded that only those that are rented out. Councilmember Hilkev,clarified that the Program includes all rentals. He stated that he has never seen a copy of the contract with the County of San Bernardino. Assistant City_Manager BgU, stated that he has a copy of the contract with the County. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned who signed the contract. Assistant Citv Manager Berry, responded that it was approved many years ago. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that there are a lot of rentals in the City that are currently paying fees to the County. He questioned how the violations will be cited. Assistant CitesManager Berry, stated that the citation will go to the property owner. Code Enforcement Officer Owens, stated, that currently they cite the renter and it is a problem because the renter feels that it is the property owners responsibility and the property owner feels that it is the responsibility of the renter. Councilmember Hilkev,questioned if the proposed action is approving the staffing of 1.5 full time employees. Assistant Cijy Manager Berry, responded in the negative. Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 10 Councilmember Hilkev, questioned if staff will be inspecting for non-safety mechanical. Code Enforcement Officer Owens,responded that if it is considered a public health situation, yes. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned if not a public health situation. Code Enforcement Officer Owens,responded that it can be recommended that they make the repair. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that he appreciates including the apartments in the program. He strongly feels that the single-family home fee is much too low. He would like the single family fee to be changed. i Mayor Ferr6 opened discussion to the public. Kim Hathaway, 22988 Vista Grande Way, stated that she owns a rental property at 22235 Victoria that her son lives in. She stated that it is not a business. He pays the house payment only. She stated that she cares for and loves this City and because of that she stands before the Council as a very concerned citizen that has lived in Grand Terrace since 1960. She stated that when she moved to Grand Terrace her mother immediately became involved in community organizations. One of the projects that she spearheaded was a beautification program within the city that included underground wiring. She grew up learning to be involved in the City, to follow the rules, to be kind and considerate to people, honest and forthright and that if she followed the rules she would not be punished for doing what is right. Lately it seems in Grand Terrace that everywhere they turn there is a penalty or a fee of some sort that is being imposed on them. It seems that if you live on Barton Road and the City or a Developer wants your property it's too bad if you don't want to sell or don't want to move, because you are going to have to. It is too bad if you don't want a Lowes or Riverside Highland Water Co. or Manhole Co. or a three story senior complex in your backyard. Now with the new idea of a residential inspection program and maintenance fee. No one wants to look at a run down property, but why are you going to punish those who take care of their property and follow the rules. In the staff report that she read it said mandatory inspections. Maybe you wouldn't have to higher another inspector if you were only inspecting the shotty properties. If they are in violation,give them a notice and time for the compliance. If it is not fixed in the allotted time,then perhaps the City could contract it out and the owner would be billed for the service. If they don't pay then this results in a property tax assessment against said property for the amount and the fine. She asks that the Council think long and hard, search their conscience about this and other projects you are working on within the City. She would like them to be fair to those who take care of their properties. If you don't follow the rules you pay a price if you do you should be rewarded, not charged a fee. She was taught to love her neighbor as herself, to stand up for what she believes in and to stand for principle and right and fair ideas. She asks the Council if this Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 11 action or actions are really a right and fair idea, right now she thinks not. Karen Fricke, 10630 Town Center Drive #16, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that she is the executive director of the Apartment Association Greater Inland Empire. She stated that they are a chapter of the California Apartment Association. She represents over 1200 rental owners and over 60,000 rental units in the Inland Empire. Although they have been working with the Assistant City Manager Berry on this program,the Apartment Association Greater Inland Empire still opposes fee based rental inspection programs. Fee base programs punished the good owners who take care of their property and do nothing for those who do not. In the plan before the Council, 28% of the revenues for that program will come from 1 owner, 1 property, a well kept professionally managed property. TheHighlands will be charged $20,000.00 for your inspector to walk around on the grounds, that is clearly punishment. An Inspection Program will not clean up substandard rentals stock,it will not improve the quality of life in the neighborhoods, and it will not increase the value of homes in cities. Education not inspections is the answer. The program provides nothing for education. The cities that Assistant City Manager Berry spoke of that have successful programs, their programs are successful not because of the inspections,but because of the education program. If the owners are not educated in property management nothing will change. The City will be re-inspecting and issuing fines on the same properties every year, on the same owners every year,and these are the properties that you are already having calls on. A rental inspection will not increase demands for rentals in the City. It may even ' decrease the demands if tenants are inconvenienced by inspections and this could lead to vacant units. A wonderful education program is the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program,this program is available to cities for less than$20,000.00. It is an educational program run by the police department and community volunteers. This community has numerous volunteers. Owners learn how to screen tenants and keep their properties free from crime and well kept up. Screening the tenants is key an inspection ordinance does not teach them how to screen their tenants that is why you keep going back to the same properties because you have the same tenants there and the owners do not know how to screen for tenants. Jo Stringfield,22273 Barton Road, stated that she is not a landlord. She feels that this is an overkill and the landlords are being punished. It should be saved for where the problem is. She sometimes feels that this is a way to place a lien on the property so that eminent domain can be used to take the property. She feels that this is micro-managing. She is concerned about the landlords and how they feel and how she would feel if she were one. Thelma Winkler Beach, 12570 Mt. Vernon Avenue, she seconds what everyone has said prior to her. She has no problems with owner accountability. She has a sub basement rental apartment under her roof. She feels that it is her responsibility to see that it is taken care of. An inspection schedule is written into the rental agreement,why should she pay the City to do the intrusion when it is her responsibility. She is a little disturbed about the dictatorship that seems to be progressing more and more in the community. She has been here for 20 years and has been very happy and hopes to be here 20 more. She will do everything that she Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 12 can to keep her property inside and outside as well as she can. It is not easy and it is not cheap, but it is her property and she is responsible for it but she does not want to be forced to pay for an inspection of something under her roof. Until it becomes a public problem,she doesn't feel that it should be touched. Joe Ramos, 12138 Palm Court,he has a rental at 11948 Canal Street. He has been a Grand Terrace resident for 34 years. He has some questions and comments. Why is a rental house assessed an inspection fee of$95.00 per house and a complex unit is $36.00 or$48.00 per unit. It seems like a rental house would be easier to inspect and should be lower in inspection costs. He heard a Councilmember say that he feels that$95.00 is too low and that it should be $200.00. You go from an inspection to a quality of life issue,because we live in an affluent community with high priced property values,currently,we shouldn't be paying $95.00 per unit we should be paying$200.00 a unit. He questioned if alternatives have been considered. He questioned the costs of the additional employees. He feels that this proposed ordinance is another back door tax. The owners are getting beat up and taking the heat for those property owners who aren't taking care of their property that is not rental properties. He questioned why that situation is not being taken care of. He feels that it is but not adequately enough for his taste. He would say that the rental properties are a business,but by being a business you would want to keep your property up and that there are other ways to make a rental property owner comply. Why not give the code compliance officer administrative citation power. He opposes the tax. Jeffrey McConnell,2175 8 Walnut Avenue,stated that he is wearing his real estate hat today. He stated that he is involved and deals in real estate everyday and sees pros and benefits of enforcement,so he believes that some kind of enforcement should address the problems that Grand Terrace has with a few absentee and owner occupied homeowners that don't take care of their property. He feels that the way this program is presented it is kind of discriminatory. Maybe a drive by inspection should be done. He is in favor of some type of enforcement. He knows that when you clean up blighted areas it does improve property values. Another problem that has not been discussed yet is graffiti, which seriously contributes to blight. Code Enforcement Officer Owens is very busy and is on top of things. He stated that she works with violators. He doesn't think that the City should bring in another code enforcement officer. He thought that when the Outdoor Adventure Retail Center is developed, the money the City will get would allow for more staff to be hired for this problem that exists. Maybe Council could wait a few more years to implement this program or create some type of temporary plan with the help of Karen Frike. He doesn't feel that Grand Terrace should be compared to San Bernardino or any of the larger cities. He would like the Council to take everything into account and compare apples to apples. Carol Bischoff, 21951 Grand Terrace Road, stated that she agrees with those who have spoken this evening. She is opposed to the fee. The neighbors of her rental property could do some cleaning up of their property. She thinks if anyone should be punished it should be them too, along with renters. She doesn't feel that those rental properties that are kept up i Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 13 should be penalized and given all of the fees when they are compliant. Her renter had threatened to move out if the manhole project goes in. She fights the idea of losing her r renters. She would like to see Grand Terrace beautified, however, she feels that they are penalizing those who are keeping up their rentals and that it is very unfair. She would like to see the homeowners around her clean up their properties. She is opposed to the program. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, stated that the City has a Code Enforcement Officer _ and now the City is going to hire a professional home inspector for $25,000.00 a year including all benefits. We are not going to get much for this amount of money. He feels that the City does not need this program and is opposed to it. Mayor Ferr6 returned discussion to the Council. Councilmember Miller,stated that he has been in property management for 25 years. He and his wife have managed apartments, duplexes, and rentals. They currently have rentals and pay a fee every year on some of the rentals, which are not in Grand Terrace. He can understand what they are thinking. He wasn't excited about paying the fees that he has to pay. Since he came onto the Council he has wanted to see about looking into getting another code enforcement officer. He walks the City streets and feels that there are a lot of.houses that are not maintained and taken care of. He does not know if they are rentals or not. He indicated that he drove around for about three hours looking at properties in Grand Terrace and only a few of the houses that he feel are in violation are rental properties. He is concerned about the property values in Grand Terrace. In order to maintain the bedroom community and keep the values up you want to make sure the properties that are being rented do not become dilapidated and that the owners take care of the property and screen their tenants. When you find a recurring problem with a landlord you will find that the landlord does not know how to screen their tenants. He is sure that there are lot of people that own properties in Grand Terrace that are rentals and that they do take care of their property. He is concerned that those owners will be penalized. He would like to see staff look at who the repeat offenders are and maybe take a look at how we should handle them. He would like to take a look at those who own homes that are maintained and think about how to treat them. We have to come up withe some type of solution. We need to look at the fees and come up with a balance. He supports the fact that we need as many code enforcement officers that we can have. Councilmember Garcia, concurs with Councilmember Miller's comments on how we deal with those property owners that do take care of their property. We want to structure the process in a way that we take care of the problem. She is in support of the program but concurs with Councilmember Miller that we need to find a balance. She agrees with the idea of education and prevention. She asked about the Crime Free Multi-Housing. Lt. Guerra, stated that there are properties in the program. Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 14 Councilmember Garcia, would like to see 100% of the complexes in the crime free multi- housing program to get the education. She questioned what the back log is that the city is dealing-with code enforcement. Code Enforcement Officer Owens, responded that there is a back log of 100. Councilmember Garcia,questioned once someone calls in with a complaint does it become a case. Code Enforcement Officer Owens, stated that once a complaint comes in it doesn't become a case until after the inspection. It depends on whether it is a public safety issue, a vacant property, etc. Generally you get the complaint, you do the inspection. If it is a public and safety issue that inspection usually takes place within a couple of days. If it's a complaint about tall weeds and grass it can wait for weeks or sometimes a month. j Councilmember Garcia,,confirmed that those complaints that aren't public safety issues that may get back logged. She feels that when creating the Non-owner Occupied/Rental Property program that they may want to consider a variance for those properties that are well kept. Mayor Ferre, stated that she too drove around the City looking at the rentals throughout the community. She found that there were a lot of rentals that were in very good shape. She also took note of homes that were not well maintained and were not rentals. She appreciates the efforts of staff putting this ordinance together. At this point in time she doesn't feel as if we need this ordinance. She would like to re-visit this in a year. She firmly supports a code enforcement officer or two as well as a clerk. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, feels that we should educate landlords. She questioned if you rent a room in your personal home does that fall under the category of a rental. She supports the program, however, she does not want to penalize those who maintain their rentals. Assistant City Manager Berry,he stated that rental properties are a business. He doesn't see it as punishment, he sees it as more of a service. { Mayor Ferre, questioned how one would go about screening their tenants. 1 Karen Fricke,responded that a rental owner should take a legal application on the potential renter and run a credit report, an eviction search, a tele-check, and a criminal report. They should not rent to someone that has been evicted, or have bad credit. They can turn down people that have a criminal history that involves drugs. They also need to verify employment and have policies. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, questioned if they charge a fee for the credit check. i i i Council Minutes July 14,2005 Page 15 Karen Fricke,responded in the affirmative. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, stated that even though you do all of the screening it still does not guarantee a good renter. Councilmember Hilkey,clarified that he feels that the fee for a single family dwelling should be more than $95.00. He stated that landlords in Grand Terrace are already paying an inspection fee to the County of San Bernardino. He has had rentals for 25 years and he has paid a fee to the County of San Bernardino and they did nothing for the fee. He knows that there are landlords that do maintain their rentals. He stated that half of the police calls are from the two apartment complexes. He feels that there is a way that we can have a successful program. He would like to see what other cities in the County are doing. He feels that rentals are a business and should be treated as such. Staff will move forward with certain refinements to the program and bring it back to Council for review at a later date. CLOSED SESSION-None Mayor Ferre adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m.until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday,August 11, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace P�''!(?, F a c [NIDI YG p COMM APPE-LOVA L CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING'-JULY 26,2005 A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace, California,on July 26, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor Bea Cortes,Mayor Pro Tem Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Jim Miller, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager Tracey Martinez, Deputy City Clerk Steve Berry,Assistant City Manager ABSENT: Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director Jerry Glander,Building& Safety Director Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff s Department John Harper, City Attorney PUBLIC COMMENT -None 1. HVAC Maintenance Agreement CC-2005-73 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES,CARRIED 4-0-1-0(COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA WAS ABSENT),to enter into a new 10-year agreement with Honeywell for HVAC equipment and a full maintenance contract on all city-owned HVAC units. Mayor Ferr6 adjourned the meeting at 11:25 p.m.until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday,August 11, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7T 'z 7, i d 41" titer _ n`-y ��SA�F�F R 1`�E�*,P,`,- R_ -A, L i� CRA ITEM( COUNCIL ITEM(X ) MEETING DATE: August 11, 2005 AGENDAITEM SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO DIRECT COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT SEWER USER FEES ON SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ROLL 2005-2006 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX County has requested resolution for specific direction to collect the City delinquent sewer user fees on the upcoming 2005-2006 property tax roll. City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 112, as amended by Ordinance No. 144 (1993) , Ordinance 163 (1996) ,Ordinance 180 (1998) , and Ordinance 209 (2004) , "Comprehensive Fee Schedule' , establishing the fees for taxes, permits, licenses, services, facilities and activities provided by the City of Grand Terrace. Ordinance No. 112, Exhibit "A" , Item 17 (c) , "Sewer User Charges, Lien Status of Delinquent Charges; states that "Any sewer service charges unpaid for a period of six (6) months shall cause a lien to be recorded upon the real property served . . . Once the lien is placed on the real property, the delinquent amount and all penalties shall he added to the tax roll" . The Finance Department is reporting 2 potential parcels in which sewer user charges are delinquent more than six (6) months. Each user and property owner, if different than the user, has been given ample notice of the potential city actions. The final number of parcels submitted may he increased if more delinquent users are found or reduced if the delinquent user pays the amount due before Staff submits the notice to apply special assessments to the tax roll to the Auditor-Controller. The final list to direct collection of delinquent sewer users is due in the Auditor-Controller's office by August 10, 2005 . The resolution will be sent after it is approved on August 11. COUNCIL AGUIDA ITEM N01jov i THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE i Page 2 Delinquent Sewer Users Tax Roll Collection A Six month delinquency represents three regular billing cycles; a courtesy notice after the third and fifth month and a "goldenrod" notice after the six month with a copy of the ordinance. In accordance with Government Code Sec.29304 the County's processing cost, $1 .20 per parcel, will be added to the total assessment. Sta'ff�Reconrinends.'�=thadt.�_:Counc <1'_s 1. Approve and adopt Written Report of Delinquent Sewer User Accounts containing the description of each parcel number and amount of delinquent fees for all sewer accounts delinquent over six months. 2. Direct staff to file such report with the Auditor/Controller of San Bernardino County for the purpose of collection of such delinquent fees, along with the -general property taxes for the 2005-2006 property tax roll . -2- I r �, THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Page 3 Delinquent Sewer Users Tax Roll Collection Delinquent Sewer Users at 7/20/05 : Service Address Amount APN# 12168 Mt Vernon Unit 91 $316.04 0277-032-91-0000 12710 Royal 165.72 0277-341-01-0000 $481.76 • -3= i RESOLUTION NO. 2005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REPORT OF i DELINQUENT SEWER USERS FEE AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH DELINQUENT FEES BE COLLECTED O'N'THE TAX ROLL AND BE IMPOSED AS A LIEN UPON PROPERTY I WITHIN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5471 of the California Health and Safety Code, ! the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace did .fix reasonable sewer user fees; and i WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5473 of the California Health and Safety Code the City Council has elected to have delinquent sewer user fees of more than six months, for ' fiscal year 2003-2004.collected on the tax roll, in the same manner, by the same persons and at the same time as together with and not separately from, the general taxes, and has caused ,a written report ("Written Report") to be prepared and filed with the City Clerk containing a description of each such parcel or real property and the amount of the delinquent sewer user fee, for each such parcel for said fiscal years; and WHEREAS, the City .Council has adopted Ordinance No. 180 relating to establishment of a fee and service charge. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Written Report filed with the City Clerk contains a description of each parcel of real property and the amount of the delinquent sewer user fees,for the fiscal year 2004- 2005 and the Written Report is therefore approved and adopted. 2. The delinquent sewer user fees, shall be forwarded,for the San Bernardino County Auditor Controller and shall be collected on the tax roll for fiscal year 2004-2005 in the same manner, by the same person, at the same time, together with and not separately from, the general taxes. 3. The Finance Director shall file with the Auditor Controller a copy of the Written Report, with a statement endorsed thereon over the signature of the City Clerk that it has been fully adopted by the City Council, together with a certified copy of this Resolution. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 111h day of August, 2005. f Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace I i c ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that Resolution No.2005- was introduced and adopted at regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 11 th day of August, 2005., by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City-Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 2 STAFF REPORT o - GK"RVTERZ CE City Manager's Office CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE:'AUGUST 11, 2005 SUBJECT: COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER TRAVEL FUNDING REQUIRED (X ) NO FUNDING REQUIRED () The League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for October 5 -8,2005 in San Francisco, California. Staff is requesting authorization to attend for the Mayor,Mayor Pro Tem,Council Members and City Manager. Funding for the expense is in the budget. The International City/County Management Association's (ICMA) Annual Conference is scheduled for September 25-28,2005 in Minneapolis,Minnesota. Staff is requesting authorization to attend for the City. Manager,Tom Schwab. Funding for the expense is in the budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR,MAYOR PRO TEM,COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY MANAGER,TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA,OCTOBER 5-8, 2005. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND THE ICMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, SEPTEMBER 25-28, 2005. -i COMICEL A(30ME®A ITEM ®.�� zmr 771 N Ny'l Iwo r. glm '.gv�'7�' f. SM Pill L '7"7 941 IALJ ----------- [fill 8 .y1�— s".r `• „s-.a '`si��".�.-.� xv45.t��-,-ii � A. I �� s;S�' �' UP 4tj �� ? v r f 4_r5 �?x�` '• fie y —• _ . t�3ti •.11 .eLj,►dam. ��'� .'a+Y': ,., _..�.•--:f"" ,�, +�.,.�"":�•5'61 '�... _ T{ - W - 1'� ,,.' �=�-a! S '� JAY• - .h �ff�;�. - i.{ �. _ a}Kf.¢._ l g �'` _ - -,nrt.rrJ➢lU'7 dill �1i +r' la;, ,�� _ s i � '4'1f��.. � ^ '•h.4 \ ry 7�IISiillillirill I I1 ,{I ,� t?' € \\ a�¢w•�� _ ,��Zi _ . �� -- _—�_�':,�'I it�Ill�lll tt fl a�liP �i _ "� R� � c7"�`'�•�R ._1•_.�•:� '-1.L -`n7s xta "'k I �� 3' W�f � -` st' .i�4• •��- I ..— �� - 4.::°�, �•�a:-ice: -•-- - ". �°� RECEIVED Historical & Cultural Activities Committee JUL 012005 Minutes for June 6, 2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were Pauline, Masako Gifford, City Clerk Brenda Stanfill, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen Edmundson,Ann Petta, Frances Carter and Gloria Ybarra. Pauline welcomed Gloria to the Committee. She has accepted the Secretary's job and will be taking the minutes starting in July. Ann will help her until she feels comfortable with the assignment. Secretary's Report: The Minutes for May 2nd were read and approved on a motion by Frances, seconded by Colleen. Motion carried. Treasurer's Report: The Budget shows a balance of$807.05,which will be returned to the City, as the new fiscal year starts in July with $1,200 from the City. The petty cash balance is $108.76. Frances presented a$20.32 bill for the Art Show punch. Historical Report: No report for June. Country Fair: This year's Fair will be on Saturday,November 51h. Ann noted that we need to get the Fair information on cable starting in July. The ad should indicate that applications will be available in the August issue of the Blue Mountain Outlook and at City Hall. Shelly will tend to posting the cable ad and will bring copies of the Fair applications and posters to the July meeting for review and discussion of any changes. Pauline reminded us that we will need 50 posters. The attachment of the table skirt to the new 8 foot tables was discussed again. Shelly has found some larger clips that might work and will bring them to the July meeting. Colleen had the tablecloth cleaned and it was returned in acceptable condition, so a new cloth does not have to be considered at this time. The Fair and Art Show street signs need to be replaced. A workshop has been scheduled for Monday, September-19`h at 1 p.m. Brenda passed out the new committee roster which was reviewed for corrections. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Next meeting will be July 11, 2005. There is no August meeting. Respectfully Submitted, GGq Ann Petta Substitute Secretary CITY OF GRAND TECE EMERGENCY OPERATIONSSCCOMMITTEE RECEIVE: Regular Meeting MINUTES AUG U 3 2005 July 5,2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY CLERIC'S DEPARTMENI The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Vic Pfennighausen at 6:00 p.m. Agendas were distributed. MEMBERS PRESENT—JoAnn Johnson, Vic Pfennighausen,Dottie Raborn and Glenn Nichols. MEMBERS ABSENT—Rich Haubert. CITY STAFF—Assistant City Manager, Steve Berry. GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS—None APPROVAL OF AGENDA with motion by Glen Nichols and second by Dottie Raborn. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 7,2005 as written. Motion by Dottie Raborn and second by Glenn Nichols. LIAISON REPORT by Steve Berry a. Would like Cross Training to go on with two maintenance Mikes. Get with Steve. b. Dragos will be able to help with reviewing Office In A Box's. c. Fire Department reports two small brush fires on 4ch of July. No major damage. d.. Generally, things were a little improved over last year. e. Tom and Dragos will be back on Sunday. f. Looking to have a concert in Rollins Park on September 161h by Riverside Concert Band. g. Work beginning this week on corporate yard (behind EOC). h. Vic asked if we could get Tracaire moved from front of our building. After Corporate Yard is finished. i. Volunteer Picnic date set for October I"at Senior Center as per Brenda. j. Grand Terrace Days went very well. Food venders were pleased and will come back. k. Should be able next year to move the EOC trailer to opposite side of street. 1. Will be switching phone companies on 181h. Check phones on that date. Should cause no noticeable change,but will be better and faster service. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen a. Leak in roof of trailer needs to be repaired. Vic will work on it in the fall. b. Bought 2 pumps. One is 3/ and the other % H.P. with 4 20 foot sections of hose. c. All parts to antennas have been received and Vic is working on them. One to be ' installed on,the trailer and one to be portable. d. On June 27th we had a moderate earthquake. Vic opened EOC and went on the emergency frequency and got all pertinent information. e. Several Net members were on frequency and were prepared to help if it became necessary. f. Tested out Lap Top in Community Room. Also tested out all telephones. g. Jack#8 (430-2261) was not working. Also, Jack# 12 (430-2265) was not working. h. Both were turned in and will be repaired. G0,'_J,rHCiL ACIENDA ITEM NO �2C� i UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Trailer roof maybe a major repair job or could possibly be a simpler repair. NEW BUSINESS a. Vic indicated he hoped to be away for several weeks this summer. b. Vic would like to order some"Restricted"yellow tape to have available should it be needed.. c. Still trying to solicit new members. TRAINING/SPEAKERS a. The August 2°d meeting will be held at Fire Station 23 and will be a training session. ADJOURNMENT at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �JoAnn Johnson, Secretary NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, AUGUST 2ND, 2005 AT 6 P.M. SPECIAL PLACE WILL BE FIRE STATION 23 I 4 '�-`- Comniunity,and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA STAFFa_O:RT CRA ITEM ( :) COUNCIL ITEM (X ). MEETING DATE: August 11, 2005 FUNDING REQUIRED: ( ) 'NO FUNDING REQUIRED ( X ) SUBJECT: GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-14,• E-05-16 - A proposal to develop. 120 units of multi-family senior housing, a 6,500 community senior center, and a four acre passive park. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Environmental Assessment E-05-16, General Plan �i Amendment GP.A-05-01, and Specific Plan SP-05-01 as recommended by the Planning Commission. Background: On August 4, 2005, the City Planning Commission-held a public hearing for a proposed 120 unit multi-family senior housing project with a 6,500 square foot community senior center and four acre passive park. The project is located at the site of the existing community senior center along the south side of Grand Terrace Road.approximately 200 feet east of Mt. Vernon Avenue. The attached Planning,Commission staff report presents information regarding the project's location and design as well as the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Planning Commission. Draft minutes to the August 4ch Planning Commission meeting are also attached. Upon receiving testimony from the general public, the Planning Commission approved the project per staffs recommendation on a vote of 4-0-1 with Commissioner Bidney absent. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the 'City Council approve Environmental Assessment E-05-01; approve a resolution to amend the City General Plan as requested.under GP-05-01, and adopt an ordinance approving the Blue Mountain Villas Specific Plan under SP- 05-01. 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • 9 9 8 4- 0O3UMCllL Ohl V�0. CO i ORDINANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO GP-05-01 FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY GENERAL PLAN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT TO ADD A NEW LAND USE DESIGNATION OF MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a General Plan Amendment to allow for a Medium,High Density Residential designation with a density of up to 20 units per acre for senior citizen to be considered by the City Council of the City of-Grand Terrace: and. WHEREAS,the applicant,has additionally applied for the approval of SP-05-01,. SA-05-14, and E-05-16 to construct a 120 unit senior-oriented multi-family residential project with an overall density of 20 units per acre on approximately six acres of property located south of Grand Terrace Road approximately 200 feet east of Mt. Vernon Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0276-461-09 and 14); and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Thursday,,August 4, 2005; and WHEREAS,,a properly noticed public .hearing was'held by the City Council on Thursday, August 11, 2005; and. WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Article 6, Section 15070, the, proposed project qualifies for a. Mitigated Negative Declaration in that all potential environmental impacts of the project may be mitigated to a level of insignificance. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. E-05-16. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. ' The City General Plan Community Development Element -shall be amended to incorporate the new land use designation proposed Medium High rDensity Residential as described in Exhibit A. 2. the City General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended. to identify property proposed for development .under SP-05-01 as Medium High - Density Residential. 3. General Plan' Amendment is consistent with the current policies of the California Department of Housing regarding the provision of low/moderate senior housing. . 4. The new Medium High Density Residential designation will provide a means to comply with State housing policies. 5. The new Medium High Density residential designation will assist in meeting the housing needs of the residents of Grand Terrace. 6. Effective Date: The Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day of its adoption. 7. - Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public Places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. �-_ 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on August 11, 2005 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on August 25, 2005. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Attest: City Clerk I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on August 25, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 2 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SP-05-01 (BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS SPECIFIC PLAN) AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT E-05-16 WHEREAS, the property covered by the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan is owned by i the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the project site is the location of the existing community senior center and master planned Petta Park; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan requires the preparation of a Specific Plan for all multi- family projects of 20 or more units; i WHEREAS, the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan land uses are consistent with those identified in the City General Plan for Medium High Density Residential uses; and WHEREAS, development of the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan will result in high quality and affordable senior housing for City residents; and WHEREAS, development of the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan will result in the provision of a new community senior center and new recreational opportunities through the construction of a new park for City residents; and 1 WHEREAS, the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan, as presented in Exhibit A, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace; and I WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental p Quality Act, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program have been prepared under E-05-16, for this proposal with the Environmental Assessment(Exhibit B) having been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearings on August 4, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following its public hearing on August 4, 2005 recommended that the City Council approve the Blue Mountain Senior Vilas Specific Plan under SP-05- 01 and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration under E-05-16, set out in full in the attached Exhibits A and B; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on , 2005 for SP- 05-01 and E-05-16. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposed Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan (SP-05-01) set out in full in Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. i Section 2: The Mitigated Negative Declaration on file in the Community Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace (E-05-I6) is i hereby approved as Exhibit B. Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 315t day of its adoption. Section 4: Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places with fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the_ day of , 2005 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the of , 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as to form: John Harper, City Attorney i Community and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA I I I TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 4, 2005 SUBJECT: GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-14, E-05-16 - A proposal to develop 120 units of multi-family senior housing, a 6,500 community senior center, and a four acre passive park. � I APPLICANT: Corporation for Better Housing LOCATION: South side of Grand Terrace Road, east of Mount Vernon Avenue. -22627 and 22645 Grand Terrace Road. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of General Plan Amendment GPA-05-01, Specific Plan SP-05-01 to the City Council. Approve Site and Architectural Review SA-05-14, and Environmental Assessment E-05-16 subject to the Conditions of Approval. REQUEST: The applicant has submitted applications for all necessary entitlements to develop a 120-unit senior housing complex supported by a community senior center and passive park on a 6-acre site. The proposed project requires the submittal of the following applications: ■ General Plan Amendment to designate the site as Medium High Density Residential, a new designation for the City's General Plan. ■ A Specific Plan which will serve as the project's zoning designation and provide for site development standards. ■ A Site and Architectural Review to evaluate the facility's architecture and landscaping. ■ An Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts of the project per CEQA guidelines. I 22795 Barton Road ® Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 ® 909/ 824-6621 The proposed project calls for the development 120 units of senior-oriented housing. The project will be developed by a private non-profit entity that specializes in affordable senior housing projects. The development will be assisted financially through the City Community Development Agency Low/Moderate Housing Fund. In addition to the residential component of the project, the developer will construct a new community senior center to replace to the existing senior center. The Community Senior Center will be operated by senior volunteers who currently operate the existing facility. The third project component will be the development of a four acre passive park. The park will be maintained by the facility operator, but will be open to the general public. The park has been designed in general compliance with the Petta Park Master Plan prepared in 2003. An environmental assessment of the Park Master Plan was heard before the Planning Commission in April 2003. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel located immediately south of Grand Terrace Road and approximately 200 feet east of Mount Vernon Avenue. It includes two individual parcels, both owned by the City of Grand Terrace. The easterly parcel is a one acre parcel previously occupied by a two-story single family residence. The westerly parcel is five acres in size. It is occupied by the City's Senior Center and parking lot surrounded by vacant property. The entire site is generally configured as a triangle with a southern property length of 1,113 feet and an eastern property length of 460 feet. The site has approximately 760 feet of frontage along Grand Terrace Road. The existing site topography indicates a general slope from east to west with a total elevation difference of 28 feet or an average slope of 3 percent. Surrounding land uses include the following: ■ North—Vacant property with an Edison easement and transmission towers ■ South— Single family residential ■ East—Terrace View Elementary School ■ West— Single family residential Properties to the south and west have been graded as residential pads and drain toward their street frontages on Mount Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street. The adjacent elementary school is graded to drain onto Grand Terrace Road. Property located west of Mount Vernon is developed as the Highlands Apartments. The project site fronts onto Grand Terrace Road. Grand Terrace Road is designated as a Local Street with a right-of-way of 60 feet and an improved section of 36 feet. Complete half-width improvements have been made along all project frontage including 18 feet of asphalt paving, concrete curb and gutter, and a five-foot sidewalk. The six-foot parkway is improved in front of the senior center and parking lot. The parkway along the vacant westerly portion of the site is unimproved. 2 The north half of Grand Terrace Road is improved with 13 feet of asphalt paving with a transition westerly to a full half-width improvements at the intersection of Grand Terrace Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. The proposed project will be required to widen the north side of this roadway to its ultimate improved section from Mount Vernon Avenue to the property's northeast corner. Mount Vernon Avenue serves as the primary access to Grand Terrace Road and the project. It is designated as a Secondary Highway with a right-of-way of 88 feet and a 64-foot improved section which provides four travel lanes. Mount Vernon is fully improved south of Grand Terrace Road. As it travels north, it transitions to a reduced two-lane section. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING: The project site is currently designated as Low Density Residential on the City's General Plan of Land Use. This designation allows up to five units per acre. The project application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment to create a new General Plan designation of Medium High Density Residential with a maximum density of 20 units per acre. A description of the proposed designation is attached. As proposed, this designation will only be permitted for senior housing projects sponsored by the City and will require the preparation and approval of a Specific Plan. i i The site's zoning designation is R1-7.2 (Single Family Residential). This zone allows single family residential development on parcels with a minimum of 7,200 square feet. The project application includes a Specific Plan which will serve as the project's zoning. The Specific Plan includes development standards such as land uses, setbacks, parking requirements, I and architectural design guidelines. i General Plan and Zoning designations for surrounding properties include the following: Direction General Plan Designation Zoning North Low Density Residential PUB (Public) South Low Density Residential R1 —7.2 (Single Family Residential East Public (Elementary School) PUB (Public) West Low Density Residential Rl —7.2 (Single Family Residential Parcels further to the north, south, and east are designated as Low Density residential with R1- 7.2 Residential zoning. Parcels located west of Mount Vernon Avenue are designated as Medium Density residential with R-3 Medium Residential zoning. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Plan: The Site Plan illustrates the proposed development. As indicated, the senior housing project will be located on the easterly portion of the site. It will consist of a single structure with a footprint of approximately 41,150 square feet. The majority of the project is three stories providing a total I I 3 of 115,000 square feet of floor area. The project is laid out with the main building running in a north/south direction with three wings extending.from the main building in a westerly direction. The east, north, and west buildings are primarily used for the senior residential units. The central wing includes residential units, administrative facilities, and common recreational areas. The building will be three stories high with "tuck under parking at the rear of the east and south wings. The structure is designed in the "Monterey" style. The new community senior center is located at the west end of the south wing. It consists of a single story structure of approximately 6,579 square feet. It includes a main common room, library, crafts room, kitchen, and administrative offices. A curvilinear balcony runs along the west side of the building offering a view of the park. The project includes two individual parking lots. The east lot runs along the east and south property lines of the residential. As previously noted, 45 "tuck in" spaces are located on the first floor of the east and south wings. A standard fire department "hammerhead" turnaround is located at the west end of the lot to provide for emergency access. An additional 77 standard size parking spaces are located along the east and south property lines for a total of 122 spaces designated for use by the project's residents. This parking lot is accessed through gated entrance from Grand Terrace Road near the northeast corner of the lot. The perimeter of the lot is secured by a six-foot wrought iron fence. A visitor parking lot is located north and west of the senior residence. This lot is accessed from Grand Terrace Road by a 26-foot wide driveway near its northwest corner. A total of 60 standard size parking spaces are provided including four handicapped spaces. This parking lot will also be used by visitors to the Community Senior Center and park. The westerly four acres will be developed as a passive park. The park has been designed to incorporate many of the features of the original park master plan submitted to Planning Commission review in April 2003 including walkways, a citrus exhibit, a sculpture garden, and community holiday tree. Conceptual Grading: The site naturally slopes in a general southeast to northwest direction. The project's high point is located near the southeast corner with an elevation of 1,100 feet ASL. The site slopes at an average of 3 percent to the northwest corner with an existing elevation of 1,072 feet ASL. The easterly frontage of the property along Grand Terrace Road has been graded and improved with a parking lot and community senior center. All structures are proposed for removal. The conceptual grading plan indicates that the building pads for the main structure will be stepped down from a finished pad elevation of 1,086 feet ASL for the East Wing to 1,084.5 feet ASL for the North Wing, and 1,082 ASL for the South Wing. These floor elevations will require a cut of approximately ten feet into the southeast corner lowering the structure approximately four to five feet. A retaining wall will be constructed along the east property line dividing the elementary school from the project. The wall will gradually increase in height from at-grade at the southeast corner to approximately seven feet 150 north. The wall will then decrease back to grade near the 4 northeast property corner. The resident parking lot will be graded to a slope of 0.8 percent draining the parking lot to the southwest corner of the residence building or to Grand Terrace Road. The visitor parking lot will drain northwest to the main driveway entrance with finished grades from 2.0 to 4.0 percent. Preliminary Landscapin : A conceptual landscape plan was prepared by RHA. Highlights of the plan include shade trees along the east and south property lines to provide shade tot eh resident parking lot while serving as a buffer for adjacent land uses. Street frontage of the residential area focuses upon turf and street trees consistent with the City's street tree ordinance. The park area will be characterized by a wide range of plantings offering different "gardens" through the park. The south property line will be planted with shrubs that will allow adjacent residences to maintain a view. Accent trees will be scattered throughout the park area. Floor Plans: The residential units include three floor plans. Plan A is a one bedroom unit with a total of 551 square feet of living area. Alternative Plan Al is also a one-bedroom design with a total of 539 square feet of living area. Plan B is a two-bedroom unit with a total of 821 square feet of living area. Alternative Plan B 1 is a two bedroom unit with 808 square feet of living area. Of the total 120 proposed units, 103 units will be of the Plan A and Al designs while 17 units will be Plan B and B1 designs. Optional balconies ranging from 58 to 60 square feet are provided on all units except those along the east and south exteriors. Single units will have a bedroom of approximately 120 square feet. Double units will have a master bedroom totaling 180 square feet with a walk-in closet and a second bedroom of 115 square feet. All units have a living.room/dining room, a kitchen, a full bathroom. Elevations: The proposed structures will be constructed using a Monterey style of architecture with shades of Mediterranean and Craftsman style. Monterey elements include gable roof lines with exposed rafters with multiple roof lines to break the monotony of a single roof line. All roofs will use reddish clay tiles. Multiple pane windows with accent braces are used throughout the structure as well as balconies to further break up the wall planes. The exterior will be finished with stucco in shades of white and-tan with accent colors below the first floor windows. Wood accents around the windows further break up the stucco. All fences and gates surrounding the project will be constructed of wrought iron which will provide security while maintain a feeling of openness. Wooden trellises are provided along the west side of the residential building to provide shade to first floor balconies while assisting in transitioning the "Monterey" theme from the structure to the park. i 5 .I Color and Materials Board: The applicant has submitted a materials board indicating material types and colors for the structures. The walls will be primarily white stucco with accents of Mediterranean tile. Entryways and columns will be accented with reddish brown tiles. Wood trim around the windows will be accented with atones of brown (cardamom). Roofing tile will be reddish brown concrete tiles with a Mediterranean design to blend with the entire building architectural theme. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: The following comments were made by various local agencies in reviewing this project: Building and Safety: Please refer to the comments made by the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in his memorandum of July 18, 2005 City Traffic Engineer Please refer to the comments of the City Traffic Engineer in his memorandum dated July 9, 2005. As indicated, the project will generate approximately 594 daily vehicle trips with 34 morning peak hour and 42 evening peak hour trips. Many of these trips will be existing trips associated with the existing community senior center operating on the site. It is the Traffic Engineer's finding that the project will not have a significant impact of traffic circulation. County of San Bernardino, Fire Department, Community Safety Division: Please refer to the comments made by the County Fire Department in its letter dated Other Agencies: The Colton Unified School District has issued a letter dated July 18, 2005 indicating that they have no comments regarding the project. IMPACT MITIGATION FEES: The project will be required to pay all standard City impact mitigation fees and those impact fees charged by the Colton Unified School District. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Initial Study of the proposed project was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The study indicated that all potential environmental impacts did not exist, were less than significant, or can be mitigated to a level less than significant. Based upon this study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared including recommended mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. 6 Potential impacts that will require mitigation include: ■ Land use compatibility ■ Seismic safety i ■ Water quality ■ Air quality associated with construction activities ■ Fire hazard ■ Noise ■ Fire protection ■ Aesthetics All mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the project's Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS: Relevant sections of the Municipal Code require that specific findings be made by the Planning Commission in approving this application. These findings have been incorporated into the Ordinance amending the General Plan (Attachment 17) and Resolutions of Approval SP-05-01 and SA-05-14 (Attachments 18 and 19). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: I Upon approval by the Planning Commission, the proposed project for the development of a 120 unit multi-family senior housing project, 6,500 square foot community senior center and a four acre passive park will be subject to the attached conditions of approval as shown in the Resolution of Approval for SP-05-01 and SA-05-14(Attachments 18 and 19). I RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed project under GPA- 05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-14, and E-05-16 subject to the Conditions of Approval, as called for by i the attached Resolutions and Ordinances. Respectfully submitted, �- Gary L. Koontz Community Development Director i 7 EXHIBIT A - Specific Plan EXHIBIT A-001 - Site Plan EXHIBIT A-110 -First Level Floor Plan EXHIBIT A-120 - Second and Third Level Floor Plans EXHIBIT A-201 -Building Elevations EXHIBIT A-401 - Unit A-1 Floor Plan EXHIBIT A-402 -Unit B-1 Floor Plan EXHIBIT A-411 - Senior Center Enlarged Floor Plan EXHIBIT B - Mitigated Negative Declaration and Environmental Assessment EXHIBIT C-4 - Grading - East Half EXHIBIT C-5 - Grading - West Half EXHIBIT G Amendment to the Community Development Element of the General Plan EXHIBIT L - Conceptual Landscaping Plan ATTACHMENT 1 -Title Page for Project ATTACHMENT 2 - Site Plan ATTACHMENT 3 -First Level Floor Plan ATTACHMENT 4 - Second and Third Level Floor Plans ATTACHMENT 5 -Building Elevations ATTACHMENT 6 -Unit A-1 Floor Plan ATTACHMENT 7 -Unit B-1 Floor Plan ATTACHMENT 8 - Senior Center Enlarged Floor Plan ATTACHMENT 9 - Grading - East Half ATTACHMENT 10 - Grading- West Half ATTACHMENT 11 - Conceptual Landscaping Plan ATTACHMENT 12 - Letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company dated 7/06/05 ATTACHMENT 13 - Memorandum from K&A Engineering dated 7/06/05 ATTACHMENT 14 - Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer dated 7/09/05 ATTACHMENT 15 - Memorandum from Director of Building and Safety/Public Works dated 7/18/05 ATTACHMENT 16 - Letter from the Colton Unified School District dated 7/18/05 ATTACHMENT 17—Resolution for GPA-05-01 ATTACHMENT 18 —Proposed Ordinance to Adopt SP-05-01 ATTACHMENT 19—Resolution of Approval for SA-05-14 8 BLUE MOUNTAIN , SENIOR VILLAS AND z� — --G ND, ER RA T RACE SENIOR CENTER UNITS — sq md 22627 GRAND TERRACE ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA 92313 OWNER ;PLUMBING ENGINEER TITLE 24 ENGINEER NOTES: FIRE ALARM.FIRE SPRINKLFR,AND TRUSS DESIGN TO BE NAME: CORPORATION FOR BETTER HOUSING NAME: P.A.BREEN ASSOCIATES NAME: P.A.BREEN ASSOCIATES SUBMITTED CONTACT. MARY SILVERSTEIN CONTACT: PAUL BREEN CONTACT: PAUL BREEN 1.FOR SHEET INDEX REFER TO SHEET 0.00I.2.FOR PRQIECTSUMMARYREFER TO SHEET A-0O1 ADDRESS: 15490 VENTURA BOULEVARD,SUITE 210 ADDRESS: 22114 SOUTH VERMONT AVENUE,SUITE 201 ADDRESS: 22114 SOUTH VERMONT AVENUE,SUITE 201 3.FOR FLOOR TSUMMARY REREFER SHETO H A-001ET 01 SHERMAN OAKS,CA 91405 TORRANCE,CA 90502 TORRANCE,CA 90502 4.FOR FLO RARE AANALYSIS R REFER TO SHEET 01 PHONE: (818)905-2430 PHONE: (310)787-0689 PHONE: (310)787.8689 S.FOR UNITPARI C O ANALYSIS REFER REFER TSHEET HEE FAX: (818)905-2440 FAX: (310)787-7230 FAX (310)787.7230 E-MAIL: PBREENQBREENENG.COM E-MAIL: PBREEN(agBREENENG.COM ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CODES:2002CALIFORNIABUILDIN000DE.2001CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC,PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,AND FIRECODES - aamcxar�__ ARCHITECT MECHANICAL ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - �II]FDtDgrmC,pr,R_xS 1.«4-N]xf�flaiDvavvnLL NAME: JOHN COTTON ARCHITECTS NAME: P.0.BREEN ASSOCIATES NAME: FICCADENTI 6 WAGGONER _ CONTACT JOHN 0.COTTON,FAIA CONTACT: PAUL BREEN CONTACT: MICHAEL WAGGONER Y1DM«Qi1DCI`ab`+DP0�1]�13uiuCill ADDRESS: 3816 MAIN STREET ADDRESS: 22114 SOUTH VERMONT AVENUE,SUITE 201 ADDRESS: 16969 VON KARMAN,SUITE 240 CULVER CITY,CA 90232 TORRANCE,CA 90502 IRVINE,CA 92808 PHONE: (310)55&%16 PHONE: (310)787.8689 PHONE: (949)474-0502 FAX: (310)558.8676 FAX (310)787-7230 FAX, (949)474.1801 '`NAIL JOHNCOTTONARCHQMSN.COM E-MAIL: PBREENCBREENENG.COM E-MAIL: OHENNIS@FWCSE.COM mar eoanD_mna4uo,we«iaa.rcvo uuua,arao VIL ENGINEER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VICINITY MAP: N� E: PA.BREEN ASSOCIATES NAME: P.A.BREEN ASSOCIATES NAME: RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,PLANNERS INC. TACT: JOHN ZIEGLER CONTACT. PAUL BREEN CONTACT. CAMILO ARELLANO RESS: 22114 SOUTH VERMONT AVENUE,SUITE 201 ADDRESS: 22114 SOUTH VERMONT AVENUE,SUITE 201 ADDRESS: 3012 MISSION INN AVENUE TORRANCE,CA 90502 TORRANCE,CA 90502 RIVERSIDE,CA.92501 0 �'• - NE: (310)787.8689 PHONE: (310)787-8689 PHONE: (951)781.1930 �w (310)787.7230 FAX: (310)787.7230 FAX (951)686.8091 s°" iA IL. JZIEGLER®BREENENG.COM E-MAIL. PBREEN(g18REENENG.COM E-MAIL: CAMILOA®RHALA.COM ► a.fnu a BLUE MOUNTAINSENIOR VILLAS AND COVER SHEET GRAND TERRACE SENIOR CENTER _� _. r ., �,;�;;,� owewaru4nemanvnwawnoTmwcsamaacEmen ,xx�.,�D�x4j4P�. 1DlniD4NWtEgIiGKf!]II'Ofey G-001 �.Q rrD,.orfvfaw4 nrro nruwa !arnnon rovac'mp�wopq w .me.a �,.� ,o.nw.cnrPx x,o•wuow o-m)m,ec mN.mxl".., w� d— W: El - -.., K� N w,x llz`o ARC' BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND - SITE PLAN GRAND TERRACESENIOR CENTER =�o- ��wN C770AR IE75 ewe uo m)°TNFH A-001 co.o—. ron eEnaMou�ww� ,we.w eet', � � I INap / � PCE " W wo ZJ w o I_ 57 GUEST CARS ti QQ m L7 ]CARS I r--- =:::::z::::..". '--0 6CM CR TS R CARS I VN! RI ICOY3I�..R R - IS.7]' LAU. I ` CMOPY N.C. ® LOBBT x CMS I Y MANL ) S 11'.lA' STAM ®® H „111x' ,--1 ]CMS,' 11;,,111, H.C. ]]E♦]DR CDJTER u 6.S,x 50.i1. pmvw O - I ` Le. I' I ►-] ` CWYON ROCY �I ALH ] ]LApS 1I1 I 1768 SO.R. LOBBY 1 I a ueRo 3 cARs'1 6 CV,! I . `^1 LWTE xr: W xs' iz I W,.•O.1c' I ci�10I u rs rAr N I - F1ECiRICAL ]CMS AO +r I 1e CAR; ; e cM I PRE OmMTYCNT 2 RESIDENT CARS of iVRNMOUND x A 5 6 (45 COVERED) 7 6 g ►-] 9'X 19'TYP STALLS e ARS 6 MS 6 MS FCOU ARD IRST l_kyE1_�LODR P A_�h ^ nsno"' %CAL BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND _ (COURTYARD) FIRSTDLVEMODNTA LEVEL FLOOR PLAN oea.Ds '"'• JORN COTTON RCNI ECTS W EENDR ViU,SUIp-D TERRACE SENIOR OWER ,A9 NOTED a _1e1 O GRAND TERRACE SENIOR CENTER . _._ R.YY.,B Yw,B. ]]B],DRAND EAAACE AD.D RRA H ® „wV O�m pwcRr,wrwdOVl GMHO TFARACE,UB]]D COPoµTIDN FOfl SETTEl�1 r_ we.a ca 0 LEFi��qffd THIRQ I EVEL FLOOR P, 0 BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND 4—�GRAND TERRAC 1 H%Z COTTON ARCHITECTS TTS r. S,ECONtD..L=lV,F.L FLOOR R PLAN.L . ,e - A3 NOTED_. A-12000 OwATl0�OR� �o.ING 1-c 030lW O 0 - -- - ol U 0 U S e Q j E[ O ti 4 W¢2¢ D]O 0 0 0 i qa wr.,oATlQN 3 0 x �� c=1 Mr Tmw .•..• v,r,0 2 W km o o o Em H o o f0 Apt 9% fOFCN-�f� BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND ""' � BUILDING ELEVATIONS " COTTON AR HITECTSGRAND TERRACE SENIOR CENTER4:.IOHN °MNpA N9EN Dq NLL SEGMND IEflgACE 9EWDfl CENTEfl 4J AS NOTED Nr """C0.0e A-201 .-..—......�— � DN'._er.o¢Depfw,]ru.orxcoit°w[bwxc°u OMNp TEPPACE.G9IJ1] DONYDw TION FOfl BETTp, °JB°c J ` t t t tr-r t IIN'""'o-.(i ovi"p°2 4 ��' .r •_ - "� ro.�N�I�m,la4rmpd.4 a !'r r .r u"�v9mfey pr mg460 t[nD-a. u(o-..y v IIwp IN � /am I[p ILp tdp.�wpev' IdD vp�N drtpad(d 0.0.( k o�i`me:wm e'�M°ro 4ap w.tss �W — 1* — •-'• -,r .�ilrop�ustpr(ttpaNa(..ttII i z-r +-'r -q• ti — ral• e :o°"al��a`,a(tl.nw(o'",Iv.,.(..�..° � o y-r I'I.I II )�•—— —— ____ UNIT A FLOOR PLAN —— —— — r rp (ALTERNATE) —— 1 fNIT='tea cKFs -,17 NIT A FLOOR PLAN N 9 t ( srw N ra 2 S S El iF cr t t �vinlo.°.`c�`i w:potas me(uwln toa Ir-rop "�""r5•��i.`] n c((Irta..(arc. 1� I r-'• -�r e �• v°t<, — — r r!-I,1•—r x I" r�lr I �.t,—!fir r l I I j y-''.• _ -lp 1 `� � I I l i I I r-r I I I II I��'/I °__ I I O_� I IS " I i• ItEY PIAN r-s ' r .wNAr TRA.t,FLOOR LO5OF)R PLAN TNATE 3 t r•r ®r-s• —————LI BALCONY — UNNI IITT Al FLOOR PLAN sgqF 539 SF 1 0 isLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND = — _ — " ' UNIT'A' yON COTTON ARCHIT FLOOR PLANS oealcs GRAND TERRACE -_ _ =- SS"°OT �p __..W T A ESEIO AS"OT v(r'v SENIOR CENTER - --.- ""°"`" ER REEM F0. ED A-401 mawu�prt"o:n�.adA( ascE,umu .—. ..� „mm °. osea t --- Q' '§ w mo to urm.m.rt Iwv ovx wrt..us 4 r - ---- M.' _wha9�o M.a nab�m ,wn a.rtl.won.7'a w u 9r j, 0+e-.} �r10I w%sn:;sn�v 441i,�ow,iiwes $�g i x ••_3- r=Ym L i ,. o'n,.¢°>,K way:.� m El cm r--I° I I ❑, ITB •.j +nr OR PLAN aov.u.a....n •¢•SOs a ¢ "e 2 t x,•o N. t - iP-.• tt°a It r� r Nn wiKa L —— —— -— 0, I 4SSLL•q�C1y� r we.yr PLAN t - BOB SF va ��,F BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND UNIT'B' J GRAND TERRACE SENIOR CENTER OHN COTTON ARCHITECTS coati vOiED�` °� ATTA 13MENT 7 ,r., r �a[m°`s:e°a M s°Li[w°�u nv�orte°u[ro 4 s o o�ti poi e:iAamw[oom n mrt Q ..e.RPn u¢ra�•a ro r•aY SEMOR CENTER Silo,mt3.2�oc ,x9�fR 6,67B 60.r1. • nr[ u[¢W[lu e[nRe4i H ( ( ( ( STOR. s ti L] rNGE/rRECEERACEY.ORVC lert-•:v Dn,.,D[ ,,,,D[•,.RN j PROYDED BY Cmmn - T [•uns n On 0 _— P r , I ---_JI [I °`mi:n.R,•„"`mi>µr.. - °•nl,x r m Y.lcr,om u awa Dml•w //� \\ \ \ \ - ; KITCHEN i i -, Rom a•a u[rnr[°°D_e�rc.[[[OOmn�[,a •n 4a v,[I,m tM X.-N,tl M '•vD DD M xA•` \ \ COUYON ROOM I I / / / / //\] KiwM•'o�K wa.x 18141.1. \\ I I LOBBY [p�r �� 1/ _ MOWMEai ANACER I 1 e ---- ---- ---- i . a r Y[ 1 O upDaN.Ne Y� STAIR h.lE� 1 I �m..•,Ya , 1 I F/9 __ 1 I I ❑[ u•.nn „Yu aNL m.Ren,w SINK 1 10 0 0 . 0 I 48RARY/ ,, I YYfa NN na nr ® POOL/iV ARTS tr CRAFTS r l , ;,r JI ea • Aum`w ricttP ` 1 COUPUICR 1 CA YE ROOM I I r O L/ 1 ,`k,ya fw[[va[lif a[aRo�t�u J•6a.,. I BB••.I. 1 i � �`1 1 11 1 •JSr I. I I ' J it I v.c 1 1 "AL'O0 1 6 0 >Ta 41m au1 1 1 1 J r y x(�L I NBY PLAN "//1' (Lfll•'��/) STORAGE1 16 1 �eCO.sR�, TRASH * Y R I CO TYARD(FIRST L EL)FLOOR PLAN Seq.GyF and yr,0 1 _ SENIOR CENTER reo1.Dy BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS AND _ ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN _ —, JOHNCOTTONARCHI EC S DLUEMOLWA EMONNLWNOCRAI[OTERRAMH.ORC . [-NOTED A-411 aen DRWDTenR•[6 ow GRAND T _�_� a�,..-.R n~,,.[ P�DnR,a„�.� OMnGTEAMCE GO]]I] D]6.D[N TERRACE SENIOR CENTER ,gym �D DR�T;,�DR�E,„: of IN:Ifvnavllv h g t� i it \._T�., ;.i :S// •�i �\ry-' .\••• •, �o ••`\x •� ;1 /mil I sF- 7 10 MAMH LIE BE MW C-4 Isis CONCEFRIAL GRADMI AND DRAKAJGE 11M T�.wo owm Ban uw mm m CONSULTING ENGINEERS SING P.A.BREEN ASSOCIATES �M'' yr •Yfca l�i T+ �• i ` �r is T.. ,�.11Y�'('.yjra'I. ' 1 '�h '",.-,;@p�.. ,.R1,t�Yk*F�'�%.��; �k,.� •�. ,.�t "�f.f., } � i`f 1`�(s�w %" '>s '. ,c�7:.�:.• 'I'��r��4�'1 lYa.' ` �� T M4�,Vy°�"�s o`ti yy1• r ,]Tt�J_��x, 1 �¢t �vA `��r�;� �.'�- 's' �^ :;Vic'�ts� • ©. !A, '�y' .,i � silx; �i,:rt. � =�F"'•�n'. '' • 'r'.id".x ��I t yr`,`r.�i+'� •� ��'h;, i �' ,� ,�^r I•v i�„� ;t t� + f1�{�.j,± is.. -.+�t`xKlj�n �k. `< °l r,. o., "i V' .. ,..r rll '.jtMr"+-F'`.,�'�+}W'+/•r} ��.,'� ' 1 ..+'a' �.� :';FJ[p� f1 •ay.✓ .Y��23Y' ....�. :l-.d LR �Y ::I.Y•.t�.'dd�zi}' �' � '' ..' ,''-c •4#' .4 �'"�i� >'k:. •tc' ,�.•a,':a`S.ur,r• .a%e x: $ 't�'t4„ "J+ � -.�"`i �»f�. y tJ.: }�aJ it ;��Q'^+ 2' .�' � 5 � ��' :.:,.n�,:,.t,�tY;.x:. � r�"} �`r Y x't,'��?" xptiR��+y', �, ��,' .•�a� yip;Jxf .O�.D'..s „S.3Y��i J 1' lA i.ti •J'S'.WPi! J, LEGEND Q 1B'HIGHGEATINOWAILWI ®TURF SWALEf BIO FRIER(ND ©ACCEHT7REES ® DECORATNE STONE GAP STAN DING WATER) SCREENING/61LADE MEDIUM-LARGE SHRUBS ®ACCENTPAVMp Q OPTIONAL PRE-CAST CONCRETE ©EKHISITGARDENAREA TREES (HEXAGONAL PAVERS WHICH MAY BE SCULPTURES HONEY POTS ®METAUWOOD PARK BENCH ®STREET TREES EAGRAVED WITH DONORS NAME) ®SCULPTURE GARDEN 1111ISTORICAL TION BOXES �'HOLIDAYTRUDISPLAYAREAIRANTER Q ,%ZE•GARDEN ®LOW-MEDrUM SHRUBS m DWAgFCITRU971iEF9 AREAWISEATINGWALLS (CONCRETE PAVING OR PLANTER) ®GROUNDCOVEFVMULCH aQ 7QEASENFMLDFICHAMLINKFENCE ®EKIBTMO WALNUT TREE ®CONCRETEPATH(GPAYOR COLORED ®PLANTER AREA (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED) ®SECIIRITYFENCMO(TVBU(}ULSTEEL) CONCRETE) ®NEW ENTRY FROM PARIDNG LOT ®TO O SEPARATE PLANTS HEADER Q OPTIONAL HATVRAI.ROIX BCULPiVRE ®TALL CONE SHAPED TOSEPARATE PLANER AREAS FROM (PINE TREES OR CEDARS] 7URFAREAB, BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS e w� y AND PETTA PARK lORPORANTIfON FOR IULY 22,2003 �+ CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA CONCEl'"rLJAL,ILAl\TllSCt11'.L PLAN 1 ( qN 1450 E. Washington St. Colton, CA 92324-4696 (909) 825-4128 FAX(909) 825-1715 00 P� T<`R\�SEHvt July 6, 2005 City of Grand Terrace Attn: Gary—Planning Dept. 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Re: 120 Unit Senior Residential Dear Gary; In the package I received from the City, there are no water plans. On sheet number A.110, Key Notes #3 is the Fire Department standpipe connection. This leads me to believe that there will be site water and a fire service. With this in mind, I will try to list the fees below: Capacity Fees: 120 units @ $3,130.00/ea. $375,600.00 6" Fire Suppression: 6 @ $1,112.00/ea. 6,672.00 Inspection Fee: 120 units @ $38.60/ea. 4,632.00 2" Meter Box & Set Fee 621.00 Water Stock: 1 share per unit @ $1,371.00 164,520.00 Total $552,045.00 If an irrigation meter is needed, there will be fees involved in it as well. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (909) 825- 4128. Thank you. Sincerely, Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent ATTACHMENT 12 1 ENGLNEERING LAND PLANNING En iaeering, Inc. SURVEYING Job No.: 1 1�1CJ,k 1=15 Date: `7 - C ,. I FAX - TRANSMITTAL PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING: j� .. - �� ',C�At!.. T NAME: COMPANY: FAX NO: (CA C?ot�) �7 5;�FS _.Ze6P 0 I -No es: J Ob4t�l V" W 1'V7 19..E e LO U�%A'Nzl L `S 0Z') ii y u do not receive all the pages, please call as soon as possible. (951) 279-1800. All reformation contained herein is confidential and solely for the use of the addressee NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover page): SENT- BY: i W cntta!OT,ceCorrCsnandencc\Ferats,B an}: t anstnittsl.dol : 357 Slierid a,swie 1:7 •Coroea,C�li[o_ni�92880-2029•Telephone 951 279-18D�•FAx 9�i-27>-3a'!�•xn:u r<.e- MY }-=�i3`�Ss`�^';< k• ATTACHMENT 13 . � 7/6/2005 190.195 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE SA-05-14 GPA-05-01 SP-05-01 E-05-16 1. The applicant and or owner shall provide a "Water Quality Management Plan" for the project for review and approval by the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of Building Permits and/or Grading Permit. The WQMP shall conform to the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program and as required and approved by the Community Development Director. The project requires a WQMP by exceeding the threshold as set by Category (1) construction of additional buildings and the construction of additional parking lots in excess.of 5.000 square feet; (2) Construction of 10 units or more of multi-family residents; and (8) the construction of Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more. 2. Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the applicant shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Stormwater System Ordinance(Ordinance No. 142,Subsection 1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County as required under the Clean Water Act. 3. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in accordance with the standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Drainage Study shall include, but not be limited to the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream storm drain. 4. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Developer shall construct all missing and/or damaged public improvements along the frontage of Grand Terrace Road. 5 Proposed public improvements shall be designed in accordance with the Standard Plans to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director of the City of Grand Terrace. 6. Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer for the construction of the facilities required by the Drainage Study. 7. Prior to any work within the Public Right-Of-Way,improvement plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved by the City, and an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the City of Grand Terrace. 8. A Precise Grading Plan and Soils Report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of any Grading Permit for this project. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall submit a final geotechnical report certifying conformance with the preliminary soils report and a grading certification prepared by the Civil Engineer. C:\Documents\Grapd TerracelSA-05-14 GPA-05-01 SP-05-01 E-05-14 July 5,2005.doc 190.195 7/6/2005 10 All slopes over 4 feet in height shall be irrigated and landscaped. 11 For any outside lighting proposed, a Iighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Night lighting for the buildings and parking areas shall be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways. Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface. 12. All planter areas shall be separated from parking and paved areas by a 6"concrete curb. I 13. All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt, concrete, or other Permanent, impervious surfacing material as required by Section 18.60.040D of the Zoning Code. 14. The Grassy swale in the park site shall have a side slope of 5:1 maximum side slope unless otherwise approved by the landscape architect_ I C:\DocurnentslGrand Terrace\SA-05-14 GPA-05-01 SP-05-01 E-05-14 July 5,2005.doc TEP sm P.O. Box 18355 phone: 949 552 4357 Irvine CA 92623 fax: 909494 4408 e-mail:tepirvine@sbcglobal:net mobile: 909 263 0383 .Date: July 9, 2005 To: John Lampe, Associate Planner, City of Grand Terrace s From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer (TR1433) Subject: Comments on Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan Location: 22627 Grand Terrace. Road File No: The proposed project will replace an existing 5000 square-foot senior center with 120 senior residential units and a 6500 square foot senior center. Based on current ITE trip generation rates, the project will generate 594 daily vehicle trips, with 34 in the a.m. peak hour and 42 in the p.m. peak hour. Also, based on current ITE parking standards, the project will require 86 parking spaces to meet peak parking demand. Based on the above information, the project will not have any significant traffic circulation; or- off site parking impacts. Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc. ATTACHMENT 14 i COMU�r�?� 12-8.5410 �,Tr , MEMORANDUM G 9 GRNND TERRflCE TO: John.Lampe, Associate Planner UGH I106 FROM: Jerry Glanders Director of Building and Safety/Public Works DEPARTMENT OF 9 UILDING &SAFETY, DATE: July 18, 2005 PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING SUBJECT: GPA-05-01 SP-05-0 - - -1,SA-OS 14&E OS 16 22627 Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road $ Road Senior center project ( 120 unit residential building; senior ` suite B center& ark - Corporation for Better Housing California 92313-5295 t Civic Center After project review and in compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Article (909) 825-3825 III;the foll_owing.recommendations should be considered as conditions for the proposed Fax (909) 825-7506 project. 1. Provide the following: A. Plot plan. B. Complete construction plans for structures. C. Property corner points. 2. Show any recorded easements on plot plan. 3. Provide preliminary soils report in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code. 4. All on-site utilities shall be run underground. 5. Provide proof of payment of school fees. 6. Pay all plan check,permit &inspection fees.. 7. Pay,all public works, capital improvement,maintenance, circulation and traffic improvement fees. 8. All improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California Business and Professions Code,which shall comply with all applicable requirements ofthe 2001 California Building Code,2001 California Electrical Code,2001 California Plumbing Code, 2001 California Mechanical Code,American Disabilities Act,Title 24 California Energy Requirements and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 9. Comply with NPDES requirements. 10. Install three street"lights. ATTACHMENT 15 07/18/12005 07:57 4339468i -FACILITIES PAGE 01/01 i Colton T� Unified School District Dennis b.Byas,Superintendent Robert Stranger, Ph.D.,Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Alice H.'Grundman,Director of Facilities and Construction BOARD OF EDUCATIOiV Mr. David R.Zamora,President Mrs. Marge Mendoza-Ware, Vice President joining Together to Go the Extra Mile Mr. Robert D.Armenta, Clerk Mr. Tobin A. Brinker Mr.Mark Hoover Mr. Frank A. lbarra ',r. Kent Taylor July 18, 2005 Mr. John Lampe, Associate Planner City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 RE., Corporation for Better Housing, 22627 Grand Terrace Road Dear Mr, Lampe; t I have reviewed the above mentioned general plant for a senior housing complex located at 22627 Grand Terrace Road. This senior complex would be approximately'0.12 miles from Terrace View Elementary School. I have review the documents and have no comments with this-project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at my office at (909) 680-6642. Since rely, Alice H. Grundman Director, Facilities Planning & Construction CH/ch ATTACHMENT 16 1212 Valencia Drive-Colton, CA 92324-1798-(909)380-5000 Ext.6642 Commitment to Equ41 Opportunity RESOLUTION NO. 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 'CASE NO GP-05-01 FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY GENERAL PLAN — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT TO ADD A NEW LAND USE DESIGNATION OF MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a General Plan Amendment to allow for a Medium High Density Residential designation with a density of up to 20 units per acre for senior citizen to be considered by the City Council of-the City of Grand Terrace: and WHEREAS, the applicant has'additionally applied for the approval of SP-05-01, SA-05-14, and E-05-16 to construct a 120 unit senior-oriented multi-family residential f project with an overall density'of 20 units per acre on approximately six acres of " { property Located south .of Grand Terrace Road approximately 200 feet east-of Mt. Vernon Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0276-461-09 and 14); and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held-by the Planning Commission on Thursday, August 4, 2005; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on Thursday, 2005; and WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that all potential environmental impacts of the project may be mitigated to a level of insignificance. The environmental assessment of this project was completed f under Environmental Review Case No. E-05-16. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION { OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City General-Plan Communit Develo m y p ent Element shall be amended to incorporate the new land use designation proposed Medium High Density Residential as described in Exhibit G. 2. The City General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended to identify property proposed, for development under SP-05-01 as Medium High Density Residential. 3. General Plan Amendment is consistent with the current policies of the California Department of Housing regarding the provision of low/moderate senior housing. 4. The new Medium High ,Density Residential designation will provide a means to comply with State housing policies. 1 ATTACHMENT 17 5. The new Medium High Density residential designation will assist in meeting the housing needs,of the residents of Grand Terrace., PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council'of the,City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the, day of . , 2005. , AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: , ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Mayor City Clerk c:\MyFiles\J OHN\Kadar\SA-04-16resolution 2 , i i ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SP-05-01 (BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS SPECIFIC PLAN) AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT E-05-16 WHEREAS, the property covered by the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan is owned by the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the project site is the location of the existing community senior center and master planned Petta Park; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan requires the preparation of a Specific Plan for all multi- family projects of 20 or more units; WHEREAS, the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan land uses are consistent with those identified in the City General Plan for Medium High Density Residential uses; and WHEREAS, development of the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan will result in high quality and affordable senior housing for City residents; and i WHEREAS, development of the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan will result in the provision of a new community senior center and new recreational opportunities through the construction of a new park for City residents; and WHEREAS, the Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan, as presented in Exhibit A, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program have been prepared under E-05-16, for this proposal with the Environmental Assessment(Exhibit B) having been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearings on August 4, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following its public hearing on August 4, 2005 recommended that the City Council approve the Blue Mountain Senior Vilas Specific Plan under SP-05- 01 and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration under E-05-16, set out in full in the attached Exhibits A and B; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on , 2005_for SP- 05-01 and E-05-16. r NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposed Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan (SP-05-01) set out in full in Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. Section 2: The Mitigated Negative Declaration on file in the Community Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace (E-05-16) is ATTACHMENT 18 hereby approved as Exhibit B. Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 3 1"day of its adoption. Section 4: Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places with fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the_ day of , 2005 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the of , 2005. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as to form: John Harper, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 05. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO. 05-14 TOGETHER WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-16 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION-OF A 120 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN PROJECT CONSISTING OF A PLAN A OF 551 SQ. FT, A PLAN Al OF 539 SQ. FT., A PLAN B OF 821 SQ. FT. AND A PLAN 131 OF 808 SQ. FT. WHICH WILL BE THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT ON AN APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRE.PARCEL TO BE RE-ZONED UNDER SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-01, ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GRAND.TERRACE ROAD AND EAST OF MT. VERNON AT'22627 AND 22645 GRAND TERRACE ROAD i WHEREAS, the-applicant has applied for the approval of Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-14 together with Environmental Review Case No. 05-16 to construct a 120 unit senior citizen residential project; and WHEREAS, the applicant has additionally applied for General Plan Amendment No. 05-01 and Specific Plan No. 05-01 for those portions of this project to be considered C by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Thursday, August 4,-2005; and WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) Guidelines, Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project for 120 senior citizen units qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned, will have a significant impact on the environment The environmental assessment for this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05- 16. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The proposed project and uses, consisting of a 120 unit senior-oriented multi-family residential project, with a community senior center and four acre park is consistent wit the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 05- 01 and Specific Plan No. 05-01. 2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project-are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, that they do not interfere with the neighbor's privacy, that they do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, -and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape C 1 ATTACHMENT 19 of the area. The design and appearance of the 120 unit senior-oriented multi-family residential project will be consistent with .existing residential development n the. area and the City. In addition, the site will maintain setbacks and will be appropriately landscaped- io provide a buffer and transition to the single family homes south of the,site. 3. The architectural design of this 120 unit senior citizen development, its materials, and colors utilizing muted tones are visually harmonious with surrounding residential development and natural landforms. The design is both functional fro the proposed project and is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will match existing materials and colors within the nearby residential areas. 4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the residential structures, on the subject site and is harmonious with the nearby residential ' developments. The ' proposed landscaping of the site will be minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. Because the site is mainly vacant and, undeveloped with no natural vegetation and is not part of a hillside, there will be no indiscriminate clearing of the property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides. Thus the natural beauty of the city, its setting and natural landforms will be preserved. 6. The design and locations of any signs associated with this project will be subject to the approval of a sign '.program to insure that the signs will be consistent with the scale and character of the buildings to which they are attached-or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set froth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval.- BE IT FURTHER .RESOLVED that SA-05-14 are.hereby approved subject to the following conditions: ' 1. The proposed 120 unit, senior residential project shall be maintained in conformance with the Site and Architectural Review Application as approved by the Planning Commission on August 4, 2005 and with Specific Plan No. 05-01 as approved by the City Council on , 2005. All plans shall be consistent in terms of property lines and other measurements. Minor changes or clarifications may be made by the Community Development Director or his designee. 2. The project shall adequately screen the,south property line with landscaping. 3. All structures shall comply with the seismic standards of the Uniform Building 2 1 i Code as adopted by the City of Grand Terrace. 4. Prior to the issuance of an,occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP shall .comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. I 5. All landscaping shall be properly maintained. 6. Landscape irrigation systems shall be properly installed and maintained. 7. All construction equipment shall be equipped with suitable muffler systems. 8. All occupied structures (residences and community rooms) shall be provided with adequate insulation to reduce the interior noise level to 45dB or lower. 9. All exterior equipment such as air conditioner units shall be shielded in a manner that reduces noise to project residents and adjacent residential structures. 10. The project•shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Uniform Fire Code and the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 11. Onsite fire protection systems shall be installed per the requirements of the i County Fire Department. 12. Emergency access shall be provided as required by the County Fire Department. i 13. The project shall provide alternative means of transit such as private shuttle bus service and access to mass transit routes. 14. The proposed colors and materials to be employed shall be in substantial conformance with the color and materials board and other exhibits shown at the public hearing on August 4, 2005. 15. The applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, pp p es, including but not limited to traffic and circulation fees, park fees, and school impact fees. i 16. All construction activity related to this project shall comply with the City's noise ordinance as stipulated in Chapter 8.108 of the Municipal Code. 17. All construction hours shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance. j 18. All construction debris shall be collected and placed inappropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly 1 manner.. 1 i 3 19. All mechanical equipment for this developmentshall be,screened from public view, and all,rooftop. mechanical equipment will be screened from view by either the architectural features of the buildings or by screening to be approved by the Comm unity'Development Director. 20. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations listed in the memorandums from the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works/Housing in his memorandum dated July 18, 2005. All off-site improvements shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any residential structure. 21. The applicant shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the County Fire Department, Community Safety Division. 22. The project shall be required to construct Grand Terrace Road to its full width improvement (60' right-of-way/36 foot improved section) with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk,, along its north side for the length of the property's frontage. 23. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions in the letter,from the-City Traffic Engineer in the letter dated July 9, 2005. 24. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions in the letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company in the letter dated July 6, 2005. 25. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions in the letter from the Colton Joint Unified School District in the letter dated July 18, 2005. 26. Security gating shall be provided for the main entrance to'the development and around the park. A detailed fencing plan showing the design, appearance and location of said required fencing shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 27. A precise grading plan with soils report shall be submitted to the-City for review and approval prior-to the issuance of any grading permit for this project. 28. This project shall provide at.least 122 resident parking spaces and 60 visitor spaces. 29. Three copies of landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. Said plans to be prepared-by a licensed landscape architect. Said plans to be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the new construction. All landscaping and irrigation facilities shall be installed prior to the final occupancy of the any residential building. 30. Detailed landscape plans for all park improvements and appurtenant facilities shall be submitted to and be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 4 I I 1 31. No building or portion of a building shall'be constructed within the 25 foot setback as measured from,the Grand Terrace Road right-of_way. 32. No building or portion of a building shall be constructed within the 10 foot setback } along the easterly and southerly property lines, 33. Any signs proposed for this project shall be subject to the sign regulations of the R3 Zone and to a separate sign permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 34. All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt, concrete or other permanent, impervious surfacing material as required by Section 18.60.040 B of the Zoning Code... 35. For any outside lighting proposed, a lighting plan shall be submitted .to and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Night lighting.for the buildings and parking areas shall be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways. Light standards on the site'shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface. 36. The developer shall'pay the appropriate traffic impact fees as required by City Ordinance No. 190 prior to the issuance of building permits. 37. All contractors working on this project-shall acquire a valid City business license. 38. Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall apply for and acquire a parcel merger,to consolidate the two.existing parcels. 39. The Site and Architectural Review approval shall not be effective until the proposed General Plan Amendment under GPA-05-01 and Specific Plan'No. 05- 01, are approved'by the City Council. „ 40. This approval shall expire one (1) year-from the date of its approval unless the applicant has filed for,a building permit. In case the applicant can not.comply with this deadline, .then the applicant shall apply for an extension of the one-year prior to the original expiration date. Said time extension to be granted by the Community Development Director. In conformance with Section 18.63.100 of the l Zoning Code, no additional time beyond two (2) years from the date_of the initial approval shall be'gra'nted. f I 5 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of August, 2005 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: -4) ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission c:\MyFiles\JOHNkBluemountainseniorvillas\sa-05-14resolufloh2 6 i i CALIFORNIA PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Document Type: Negative Declaration Date: July 12, 2005 Project Title: SA-05-14, GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, E-05-16 Project Location: 22627 Grand Terrace Road Description of Project: The project will consist of construction of 120 senior housing units, a 6,500 square foot community senior center, and a 4 acre passive park on 6 acres. Project Proponent: Corporation for Better Housing Lead Agency: Community Development Department, City of Grand Terrace contact Person: GaryL. Koontz Community Development Director ty p (909) 430-2247 Public Review Period: Began: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 Ended: August 4, 2005 i Plublic Hearings/Meetings: Planning Commission-Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. Environmental Finding: Bused on an Initial Study, attached hereto, prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impact of approving SA-05-14, GPA-05-01, SP-05-01 and E-05-16, the said project qualifies fora Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have significant adverse impact on the environment. EXHIBIT B Signature: � - - Gary L. Kdontz, Comm./Vity Development Director 1 '1 City of Grand Terrace -Community Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: SA-05-14, GPA-05-01, SP-05-01 E-OS 16 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director (909) 430-2247 4. Project.Location: 22627 Grand Terrace Road 5. Project Sponsor's Name Corporation for Better Housing 6. General Plan Designation: 'Existing: Low Density Residential Proposed: Medium High Density Residential 7. Zoning: Existing: R1-7.2 Single Family Residential Proposed: Specific Plan R3-20 Medium Density Residential - 8. Description of Project: Construction of 120 senior .housing units, a 6,500- square community senior center,and a 4 acre passive park on 6 acres. 9. Surrounding Land Uses, General Plan'Designations, and Zoning: Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North PUB Public Vacant, Edison Easement South R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family-Residential East Public Public Terrace View Elementary School West R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential Community Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: ■ City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety—building and grading permits; ■ County of San Bernardino Fire Department—plan check review and approval ■ Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Water Quality Management Plan; ■ Riverside Highland Water Company—water connection; ■ City of Grand Terrace Public Works—Street storm drain, and utilities Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ■Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ■ Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ■Aesthetics ❑Recreation ■ Water ❑Utilities and Services Systems ■Hazards ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ■ Air Quality ■Noise j Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation (To be completed by the Lead Agency): ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ■ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Community Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Signatdre ( Date Gary L. Koontz Community Development Director Printed Name Title Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is,adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, `Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).. 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached,and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Community Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Ii Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the ❑ ❑ ❑ project? c) Be incompatible with.existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ e impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or ❑ ® ❑ ■ minority community)? (The site is relatively small and is vacant. It will not divide any portion of the community. ) Surrounding General Plan, zoning designations, and existing land uses include the following: Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North PUB Public Vacant, Edison Easement South R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential East PUB Public Terrace View Elementary School West ,R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? The proposed project is currently designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R1-7.2. Existing land uses include the existing City-operated senior center, a formed single family residential lot, and the undeveloped Susan Petta Park site. Proposed uses include a 120-unit senior housing project with an overall density of 20 units/acre, a community senior center, and a quasi-public passive park. These uses require an amendment to the General Plan and a zone change both 'of which are part of this application. Zoning will be implemented through a Specific Plan which will provide site-specific zoning requirements and land uses. The recently approved update to the General Plan Housing Element requires the City to provide a mechanism for low and moderate income housing including the provision of a Medium High Density residential zone. The updated Housing Element specifically identifies this site and project and i Community Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated qualifying for a higher density through the provision of affordable senior housing. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? The project-proposes an amendment to the general Plan and a zone change. If approved as part of this action, the project will be consistent with the City General Plan and Zoning. The project will be required to acquire permits or other approvals from all affected local, State, and Federal agencies having jurisdiction. Finding: No Impact. No Mitigation required. c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? Properties to the north are owned by the City and are severely constrained by Southern California Edison power lines. Terrace View Elementary School is located immediately east of the site. Single family residential neighborhoods are located west and south of the site. The proposed project includes the development of senior housing,a new community senior center,and a passive quasi-public park. The City's existing senior center is currently located on the site. The new senior center will effectively replace the current one. The vacant property west of the senior center has been designated for a passive park. An environmental assessment was prepared for a master plan for the park in April 2003 and heard before the Planning Commission. The proposed senior housing project will result in a higher density residential use than was previously provided in this general area. Senior housing projects are commonly located near elementary schools and considered a compatible land use. The senior housing will be located adjacent to single family residences south of the site. This proximity may result in potential traffic,noise, and visual impacts. However,due to the quiet and passive nature of senior housing,impacts should be less than significant provided proper mitigation measures are put in place. Mitigation: 1. The project shall adequately screen the south property line with landscaping. 2. The project shall provide alternative means of transit such as private shuttle bus service and access to mass transit routes. 3. The project shall direct all outside lighting to avoid glare onto surrounding residential properties. 4. The project shall comply with the provisions of the City Noise ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. Community Development Department 5 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? I The site has been historically used for non-agricultural uses. It is not located on property designated as significant agricultural lands by the State of California. I Finding: No impact. No mitigation required. e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or minority community)? The site is located on the extreme north end of the City. It is buffered by vacant City-owned property to the north and Terrace View Elementary School to the east. Although residential neighborhoods are located south and west of the site, the project will not divide an established community. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Ii Population and Housing. Would the proposal: I a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑ it population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ housing? Tile project proposes the construction of 103 single bedroom units and 17 two bedroom units. Assuming one - resident per bedroom, the project will create housing for 137 seniors. It is assumed that a significant percentage f'those living in the project will be existing Grand Terrace residents. ) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? SCAG growth forecasts for the City of Grand Terrace are attached as an Appendix to this document. As indicted, SCAG projects the City to increase its population between 2005 and 2010 from 12,409 to 12,928 or an increase of 519 people. SCAG projects that households will increase between 2005 and 2010 from 4,327 to 4,550 or an increase of 223. The proposed project dwelling unit and population fall well within these projections. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? i Community Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The project site is located within an existing urban area. All necessary infrastructure is in place with no majority infrastructure extensions required for project,development. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. ~� Displace existing housing, especially,affordable-housing? The project.site is predominantly vacant with an existing community senior center. No housing will be displaced for project development. The project is a senior housing project offering affordable housing for local senior citizens. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? O El El b) Seismic ground shaking? El - ii El r) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 El l) Selches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil El El conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land?• 0 h), Expansive soil? 0 M i) Unique geologic or physical features? Community Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated No known geological hazards exist on this site or the nearby vicinity. The closest known active fault is a branch of the San Andreas located approximately two miles northeast of the site. The Soils Conservation Service Soils Survey of Grand Terrace indicates that the site includes two soils classifications. The Greenfield Series is characterized as a sandy loam with a moderate erosion potential and minimal limitations housing construction and roads. The Monserate Series is characterized as a sandy loam w-*'- a slight to moderate erosion potential. It has a hardpan at approximately 30 to 45 inches which may red in moderate limitations to dwelling and road construction. a) Fault rupture? The site is not located on land known to be subject to fault rupture. However, the entire City of Grand Terrace is located in an area subject to significant seismic hazards from regional fault systems. Mitigation: 1. All structures shall comply with the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code and the City of Grand Terrace. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. b) Seismic ground shaking? The site is located in an area of Southern California that is subject to severe seismic activities including ground shaking. The subsurface conditions are identified as "thin alluvium less than 200 feet thick with a strong to very strong potential for ground shaking. Mitigation: 1. All structures shall comply with the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code and the City of Grand Terrace. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? j j The site is located in an area that is not designated as subject to liquefaction. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? The site is not located in an area subject to seiches, tsunamis, or volcanic hazards. , I Community Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ '-� ❑ body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ movements? f) Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception ❑ El ❑ ■ of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 1[) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ otherwise available for public water supplies? The proposed project involves the development of 120 senior housing units, a 6,500 square foot community senior center, and a 4-acre quasi-public park. It will result in the creation of approximately 63,000 square feet of impermeable surface including roofs, driveways, and parking lots. Domestic water to the site will be provided by Riverside Highland Water Company through an existing service. Domestic water lines are currently located along the project's frontage in Grand Terrace Road. Correspondence from the Water Company indicated the project will not impact this well. a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? The proposed project will result in an increase in runoff due to increased impervious surfaces onsite including roofs and paved parking and driveway areas. All drainage will continue to flow in a southwesterly direction, ultimately flowing into the Santa Ana River. The majority of the site will remain in a pervious condition through the maintenance of landscaped areas around the structures and the parklands. Finding: Impact less than significant. Community Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No i Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b15 Expose to people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? The project site is not located in a designated FEMA flood zone Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. i c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? The project site will include the development of paved driveways and parking areas that could result in an increase in hazardous materials entering the Santa Ana River. Maintenance of the proposed park may require the use of pesticides and fertilizers that, if allowed to exit the site, could result in potential impacts to the Santa Ana River. Due to the overall size of the project, a significant regional impact to water quality is not anticipated. I Mitigation: 1. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Bo---1 i and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. d I an water body? Changes in the amount of surface water in g Y Y• The proposed project will result in an increase in runoff due to increase impervious surfaces onsite such as roofs, driveways and parking lots. i Finding: Less than significant impact. e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? The project will use existing drainage patterns and will not change the course or direction of water movements. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. f) Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? i Community Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The project will not generate cuts or excavations that could result in the interception of an aquifer. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? The project will not change ground contours through grading activities in a manner that will alter the direction or rate of flow of groundwater. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. h) Impacts to groundwater quality? The project site will include the development of paved driveways and parking areas that could result in an increase in hazardous materials entering the Santa Ana River. Maintenance of the proposed park may require the use of pesticides and fertilizers that, if allowed to exit the site, could result in potential impacts to the Santa Ana River. Due to the overall size of the project, a significant regional impact to water quality is not anticipated. Mitigation: 1. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? The project will be supplied with domestic water from an existing distribution system owned and operated by the Riverside Highland Water Company. The water company has provided correspondence indicating that they are capable of providing adequate water supplies for the project without any significant impact. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ ® ❑ existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Department 11 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality. d) Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ❑ Short Term Development of the project will involve minor grading activities that may generate dust. The South Coast Air Quality Management District requires that all grading activities comply with District guidelines for the reduction of dust.during any construction activity. This includes the use of best management practices described by AQMD. Four criteria were evaluated to determine whether the proposed project could create a potentially significant air quality impact. Impacts were considered significant if they: • Caused ambient air quality standards to be exceeded where standards are currently met; • Contributed to a measurable increase in pollution levels where standards are already exceeded; specifically: Pollutant Threshold (lbs/day) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 Reactive Organic Compounds (ROC) 75 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100 Particular Matters (PMIo) 150 Sulphur Oxides (SOx) 150 • Exposed the public to air pollutants that are known to be toxic, carcinogenic or otherwise harmful at levels suspected to be unhealthful even if no ambient standards exist for such contaminants; or, • Created dusts,fumes,mists,odors,or other airborne emissions that may constitute a nuisance under the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. The project will involve the construction of a senior housing project, community senior center, and passive park. These activities will require grading the entire 6 acre site. Construction activities will generate dust from surface disturbance and equipment exhaust from heavy off-road equipment use. For purposes of this analysis, the project disturbance size is assumed to be approximately 25,000 square feet (0.6 acres). The heaviest construction period is assumed to take approximately 45 days. The emission of particulates (PMIo) from construction soil disturbance was evaluated using factors in the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. Fugitive dust particulate matter is calculated assuming a minimum use of dust control measures. PMIo = 6.0 acres X 26.4 lbs/acre/day= 158.41bs/day Community Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated With minimum dust control, such as once per day watering), the daily PMIo significance level will not be exceeded. However, the City of Grand Terrace requires the implementation of best available control measures (BACMs) for all construction projects. With mandatory use of BACMs, the accepted fugitive dust PMIo emissions factor is reduced to 10.0 lbs/day(California Air resources Board). By implementing BACMs, the project's construction related emissions will be reduced 60.0 lbs/day. Exhaust emissions from typical construction equipment operating during site clearing and grading(peak exhaust generation activity). The analysis assumes a construction fleet as follows: Scrapers (2) Rubber-tired Dozer (1) Motor Grader (1) Water Truck (1) The analysis also assumed seven construction workers each commuting a 60-mile round trip. Based upon these assumptions,total construction emissions were calculated as follows: Pollutant Fugitive Equip. Employee Total SCAQMD Dust Exhaust Travel Threshold CO - 77.9 7.0 84.9 550 ROG - 11.3 0.7 12.0 75 X - 95.6 0.8 96.4 . 100 X - 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 150 2 PMIo 6.0 4.7 <0.1 10.7 150 As noted, all emissions are below adopted significance thresholds. Long Term Long term air impacts may result from the use of motor vehicles by project residents and the burning of fossil fuels for energy to the units. The City's Traffic engineer has reviewed the project and determined that, at full buildout,the project will generate 594 vehicle trips per day. 34 trips will be generated during the morning peak hour and 42 during the evening peak hour. This level of traffic falls below the threshold of significance for vehicle emissions. a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? The project does not violate any air quality standard. However,the project is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is designated as a non-attainment area. Any increase in air pollutant generation will contribute to a violation of federal air quality standards in the basin. However, the project's air pollution generation due to its size is relatively insignificant in the South Coast Air Basin. Finding: Less than significant impact. Community Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No j Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? I The project is a senior housing development which may be classified as a sensitive receptor. The project is located adjacent to Terrace View Elementary School. The project is a residential project that will j be a point source for the generation of significant air emissions. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality. The project is residential and open space in nature and will not alter air movement, moisture, or temperature. I Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Create objectionable odors? The project is residential and open space in nature and will not generate any objectionable odors. i Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result : Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ a Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ lie project site is located on Grand Terrace Road approximately 100 feet from the intersection of Grand Terrace oad and Mount Vernon Avenue. Grand Terrace Road is a designated Local Street (60'RW/36' Improvement). I e south side of Grand Terrace Road along the property frontage is improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and etch up asphalt paving to centerline. The north side of the street along the property frontage is partially with sphalt paving, but no curb, gutter or sidewalk. i Community Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The project will have two access points. Resident parking areas will be accessed from a driveway located near the northeast corner of the site. This driveway will be have a security fence and gate to prevent unauthorized entry. The main entrance to the site will be located near the center of the project between the senior housing and the park. vlt.Vernon Avenue is designated as a Major Highway(100'RW/72' Improvement)on the General Plan Circulation Element and is improved near the project site to its full section of four travel lanes with turn pockets. Both sides are improved with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The proposed project has been reviewed by the City Traffic engineer. Based upon his review,the project is projected to generate a total of 594 vehicle trips per day. Of these, 34 trips will occur during the morning peak hour and 42 trips during the evening peak hour. Based upon this review,the Traffic engineer has determined that the project will not create a significant impacts to local circulation. The project will provide 122 onsite parking spaces for project residents and 60 spaces for visitors and City residents using the park. Of the resident parking, 58 will be "tuck under" spaces at the first floor level. Due to the"senior"nature of the project, it assumed that not all residents will own cars that require onsite parking. Alternative forms of transportation are commonly employed such public bus service,private shuttle bus service, and taxis. a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? The proposed project will generate 42 evening peak hour trips. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project will not generate a significant impact. Finding: Less than significant impact. b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? The project takes access from Grand Terrace Road. This local public street has been improved to City design standards and is not subject to unsafe design features. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? The proposed project has two points of access. Both driveways access the site from Grand Terrace Road, a City-maintained improved local street. The west main driveway is 26 feet in width and improved to San Bernardino County Fire department standards. The east resident driveway is 25 feet in improved width. A "hammerhead"turnaround designed and improved to County Fire Department standards will be constructed at the rear terminus of the resident driveway. Community Development Department 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? The proposed project provides 122 standard size parking spaces for residents and 60 spaces for visit( and park users. All spaces are off street and comply with City standards. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists The project is located on Grand Terrace Road, an improved public street. Sidewalks have been constructed along the project's frontage. Paved walkways are provide throughout the project and are improved to allow handicapped access. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? A bus turnout will be provided near the proposed community senior center. The project is designed in a manner that does not impede bicycle or other alternative transportation modes, Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? The project is residential and open space in nature and does not require rail or air transportation services. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. II. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in mpacts to: ) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Wetland habitat (e.g.,'marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? ® ❑ I Community Development Department 16 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ The project site is a previously disturbed site located within an existing urban environment. There are no endangered species known to live in the urban areas of Grand Terrace. In addition, there are no desirable large trees on the site or wetland habitats. No adverse impacts to biological resources are expected from the development of this project. a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? The site is previously disturbed and located within an existing urban environment. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? The subject site is a previously disturbed site within an existing urban area. A mature walnut tree is located within the proposed park site and planned for retained as part of the park's landscaping. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? The subject site is a previously disturbed site within an existing urban area. No designated natural communities are known to exist on the site. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? There are no wetland habitats within the subject site. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. f) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? The project site is located within an existing urban area and is surrounded on three side by urban development. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Community Development Department 17 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis ' I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? l410 mineral resources have been identified in the City. Therefore the development of the office and manufacturing site will not adversely impact any mineral resources. In addition, the project will have to be constructed in compliance with the energy standards of the Uniform Building Code and Title 22. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? The project will be required to be designed to Uniform Building Code and Title 22 standards for energy efficiency. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? The project will not use non-renewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. It will be designed to current energy efficiency standards. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? The project is located on a previously-disturbed site that is not known to have any significant mineral i resources. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. X. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ substance (including, but not limited to: oil,pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b� Possible interference with emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? The creation of any health hazard or potential health Community Development Department 18 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially , Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated hazard? El EJ d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 'here are no known hazards on the site or the immediate surrounding area. In addition, this project will have to comply with all applicable regulations of the State, County Haz-Mat, AQMD and Water Quality Control Board- Santa Ana Region. a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? The project is a residential development that will not use significant amounts of hazardous materials. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The proposed project will not block or disrupt any emergency access routes within the City or create L . constraints that would interfere with emergency response plans. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? The proposed project involves the development of residential and open space uses. The project will not create any potential health hazard. ' Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? The surrounding area is primarily developed as single family residential uses, an elementary school and open space. No existing health hazards are located in the general vicinity. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? The project will result in extensive landscaping around the residential units and in the proposed park. If not maintained properly, this vegetation could become a potential fie hazard. All landscaping will be properly maintained with irrigation systems. Community Development Department 19 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact j Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation: I 1. All landscaping shall be properly maintained. ! 2. Landscape irrigation systems shall be properly installed and maintained. i Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. X. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ The site is adjacent to single family residential development to the south and west. An elementary school is loicated immediately east. Property to the north is vacant with Southern California Edison transmission towers. These land uses may be considered to be sensitive noise receptors. The City General Plan Noise Element established standards for interior and exterior noise levels for various land uses. Residential uses should be limited to interior noise levels of 45 dB CNEL and exterior levels of 65dB CNEL. The Noise Element indicates that the majority of the site falls within the 60 and 65 CNEL contour lii he most easterly portion of the site is under 60 CNEL. i i Short Term Short term noise impacts may result from construction activities associated with project development. Long Term lie proposed project is a multi-family residential development designated for senior housing. Typically, senior o sing projects area characterized as low noise generators. he westerly portion of the property will be developed as a park and community senior center. The senior center iill replace the existing senior center at the site. The park is designed as a"passive"park with no athletic facilities that would attract large numbers of people and result in high noise volumes. Increase in existing noise levels? The proposed project is a senior housing project and passive park. Noise generation from these uses is typically insignificant due to the minimal high intensity activity associated with them. Finding: Less than significant impact. I I I I Community Development Department 20 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than , No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Exposure of'people to severe noise levels? The proposed project is located within an existing residential area of the City. Ambient noise results from the proximity of Mount Vernon Avenue, a major four land arterial, and I-215. Short Term Construction-activities from project development could generate short term impacts to local residences and the adjacent elementary school. Noise from heavy earthmoving equipment and other construction related activities. Mitigation: 1. All construction equipment shall be equipped with suitable muffler systems. 2. All construction hours shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance., Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. Long Term The proposed project will result in the construction of 120 multi-family residential senior housing.units, as well as a new community senior center. , These land use-may be considered as "noise sensitive" uses. However,without proper mitigation, interior noise level may exceed 45 dB. Mitigation: 1. All occupied structures (residences and community rooms) shall be provided with adequate insulation to reduce the interior noise level to 45dB or lower. 2. All exterior equipment•such as air conditioner units shall be shielded in a manner that reduces noise to project residents and adjacent residential structures. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑, 0 c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ ❑EJ o ❑ e) Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ Community Development Department 21 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I sues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated All public services are currently provided to the project site. a)• Fire Protection? The project site is provided with fire protection services by the San Bernardino County Fire Department under contact with the City of Grand Terrace. The project will involve the construction of 120 senior residential units and a community senior center. Since these will be habitable structures, they must be designed and constructed in compliance with the latest fire regulations of the Uniform Fire Code and the County Fire Department. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fire hazards onsite. Mitigation: 1. The project shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Uniform Fire Code and the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 2. Onsite fire protection systems shall be installed per the requirements of the County Fire Department. 3. Emergency access shall be provided as required by the County Fire Department. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. Police Protection: The project is a senior housing project designed to offer security to its residents. The residential area v"Ii be surrounded by security walls and fencing. The resident's parking lot will be secured with fencing an coded entry gate. Onsite staff will provide additional security. The park area will also be provided with a separate perimeter security fence. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c Schools? The project is a senior housing project constructed specifically for senior citizens. Therefore, the project will not generate school aged children who could impact the local school system. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? The proposed project will create 120 additional residences within the City. This will result in the generation of additional passenger car trips that will use local roads. Due to the self-contained nature of senior housing project and the minimal traffic activity associated with the, it is not anticipated that it will result in significant impacts to public facilities. Finding: Less than significant impact. i i Community Development Department 22 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated e) Other governmental services? The project will not require an extensive use of any other government services that would result in a significant impact. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ b) Communications systems? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ e) Storm water drainage? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ f) Solid waste disposal? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ All standard urban utilities are located adjacent to the subject site. Domestic water service is provided by Riverside Highland Water Company that maintains an 8-inch water line within the Grand Terrace Road right-of- way. Sanitary sewer service is provided by the City of Grand Terrace which maintains an 8-inch main within the Grand Terrace Road right-of-way. Storm drainage from the site will be conveyed with the Grand Terrace Road right-of-way and flow west to the.City's storm drain system at the corner of Grand Terrace road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Electrical power and telephone service are provided overhead lines adjacent to the property along the south property line. Solid waste service is provided by the City's franchised waste hauler with wastes delivered to the San Bernardino County landfill system. a) Power or natural gas? The project will consume electricity for lighting, heating, air conditioning and other domestic uses associated with residential development. Electric service to the site is provided by Southern California Edison using existing overhead lines located adjacent to the site. The project will not require any significant upgrades or expansions to the existing system. Finding: Less than significant impact. Community Development Department 23 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Communications systems? Telephone service is directly available. The project will not require any significant upgrades or expansions of the existing communications system. I Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? The project will result in the consumption of additional water for human consumption and irrigation. All water will be provided by the Riverside Highland Water Company which has indicated that its water supply is adequate to provide for the long term needs of the project. Finding: Less than significant impact. Sewer or septic tanks? The project will result in the development of 120 multi-family units and a new senior center. These land uses will require sanitary sewers and will add additional wastewater to the existing collection and treatment system. The project will be connected to the City of Grand Terrace sewer system. The City contracts with the City of Colton for wastewater treatment. The City maintains adequate capacity for both the transmission of wastewater within its lines and available treatment capacity. Finding: Less than significant impact. e Storm water drainage? Storm water form the project will drain into an improved drainage system maintained by the City of Grand i Terrace. Flows from the site will drain west within the Grand Terrace Road right-of-way to an underground storm drain system under the intersection of the Grand Terrace Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. This system has been sized to accept ultimate flows from the service are and assumes that the subject site is fully improved. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Solid waste disposal? The project will be provided with commercial trash collection service by the City's franchised waste hauler. Wastes will be taken to the San Bernardino County Landfill system. The project will result in a minor increase in municipal solid waste disposed of in the County Landfill system. Recycling programs i Community Development Department 24 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis P ' Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated will be implemented at the senior housing complex,the community senior center and the park to further reduce impacts to the waste system. Finding: Less than significant impact. Local or regional water supplies? Although the project will result in the consumption of water for domestic and irrigation uses, the Riverside Highland Water Company has indicated that it is capable of providing water for the long term needs of the project. Finding: Less than significant impact. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Create light or glare? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ The proposed project does not lie near scenic highway or will block scenic vistas. It has been designed tJwith Iicorporate architectural features and landscaping to provide an aesthetic appearance that will be compat surrounding development. a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? The project site is not located near a designated scenic vista or scenic highway. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? The project includes an application for a Site and Architectural Review. This application is reviewed by the City Planning Commission for compliance with architectural and landscape standards of the City. The review includes an evaluation of overall project aesthetics and the project's ability to conform with the local neighborhood aesthetics. Landscaping and architectural features will be used to eliminate any the potential for negative aesthetic impacts. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) Create light or glare? The proposed project will have parking lot and other exterior security lighting. Such lighting could impact local single family residences. Community Development Department 25 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation: 1. All exterior lighting shall be shielded from adjacent residences and shall comply with the lighting standards of the City of Grand Terrace. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Affect historical resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ potential impact area? o known paleontological, archaeological or historical resources exist on the site. No cultural values or sacred ses will be impacted by this project. Disturb paleontological resources? There are no known paleontological resources in the general area. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. b) Disturb archaeological resources? There are no known archaeological resources in the general area. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Affect historical resources? The site is previously disturbed. There are no known historic resources inn the general area. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? The proposed project is a residential and open space project on previously disturbed property in an existing residential area. Community Development Department 26 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? The site is previously disturbed with no known religious significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. XV. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ■ ■ parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ The proposed project includes the development of a new community senior center and a four acre passive park. The development of this park is included in the City's General Plan Open Space Element. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? The proposed project will add an,additional 120 senior housing"units to.the City's inventory which will in turn result in a higher demand for parks and open space. Concurrently, the project will,develop a four acre passive park. Finding: Less than significant impact. b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? The proposed project will add an additional 120 senior housing units to the City's inventory which will in turn result in a higher demand for parks and open space. Concurrently, the project will develop a four acre passive park. Finding: Less than significant impact. XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,'cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number'or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal,'eliminate important examples of the major periods of California Community Development Department 27 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the j incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? VII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or o i re effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR, or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. ■ Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR. Both documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. ■ Not Applicable cl Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. ■ Not Applicable nand Terrace Community Development Department Ad I thority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sunstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Community Development Department 28 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Supervisors, 22 Ca1.App.3d 1337 (1990) e Community Development Department 29 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Mitigation Monitoring Pro ram Identified Im act Mitigation Land Use Compliance Procedure Responsible Party The proposed project will result in a higher The project shall adequately screen the south Prior to issuance of density residential use than those previously property line to provide a buffer for adjacent occu anc ermits. Community Development developed within the immediate area. single family residential uses. p y p Dept., City Engineer, The project shall provide alternative means of Prior to issuance of Building& Safety transit. Community Development occu anc ermits. Dept. The project shall direct all outside lighting to During final plan check. Building& Safety avoid glare onto surrounding residential Prior to issuance of ro erties. Community Development ng permits. The project shall comply with the provisions Durinbuildlg fina plan check. Dept. & Safe ' Of the City Noise Ordinance and General Plan Building Noise Element. Community Development Geologic De t. The site is located in a general area subject All structures shall comply with the seismic During final plan check. Buildm &Safe to fault hazards and ground shaking that may standards of the Uniform Building Code and During construction. g ty result in seismic hazards to structures. the City of Grand Terrace. Water The project will result in the development of Prior to the issuance of an occupancy paved driveways and parking lots that could a Water Quality Management Plan shall belt, Duringo issuance of check. City Engineer, Building& increase the volume of hazardous entering prepared using Best Management Practices occupancy Safety the Santa Ana River as urban runoff. designed to control onsite products from p y permit. Maintenance of the park may also result entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP urban runoff. shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Tonstruction activities may result in an Prior to issuance of grading permits, the During final plan check. City Engineer Buildin & rease in urban runoff and silt into the developer shall prepare a Storm Water g Santa Ana River. Pollution Prevention Plan usingBest Prior to issuance of Safety Management Practices to mitigate urban grading permits. Hazards runoff from construction activities. The project will have extensive landscaTingAroject landscaping shall be ro erl tlu oughout the residential area and parktained at all times. Landscape irrigation Ongoing operation. Community Development Improperly-maintained landscaping mams shall be properly installed andDept.result in a fire hazard.. tained. Building&Safety Noise Construction activities could generate short All construction equipment shall be equipped During construction Building& term impacts to local residences and the with suitable muffler systems. activities. Safety adjacent elements school. Code Enforcement All construction hours shall comply with the During construction Ci of Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance. activities. Building& Safety All construction activity related to this project During construction Code Enforcement Building& shall comply with the City's noise ordinance activities. Safety as stipulated inChapter 8.108 of the Code Enforcement Munici al Code. T mhe senior residences and community senior All occupied structures (residences and During plan final check. Building& Safety center are classified as "sensitive" land uses that may be impacted from adjacent street community rooms) shall be provided with During construction.noise. adequate insulation to reduce the interior noise level to 45dB or lower. All exterior equipment such as air During plan final check. Building& Safety conditioner units shall be shielded in a During construction. manner that reduces noise to project residents and adjacent residential structures. Public Services The project will result in the construction of The project shall comply with all During final plan chec r habitable structures. Failure to comply with applicable regulations of the Uniform Fire During construction, k Building& Safety Fire Department safety requirements could Code and the San Bernardino County Fire County Fire Department result in potential impacts. Department. - Onsite fire protection systems shall be During final plan check. Building& Safety installed per the requirements of the During construction. County Fire Department.;;[ County Fire Department Emergency access shall be provided as During;fifialplan check. Building& Safety re uired b the Count Fire De artment. Dunng ruction. County Fire Department �MoTE CCommunity Services Department Staff Report CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM () (X)MEETING DATE: August 11, 2005 SUBJECT: STREET CUTS ORDINANCE FUNDING REQUIRED: () NO FUNDING REQUIRED (X) RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING At the July 14, 2005 City Council meeting, council granted a request from the Gas Company, a member of the Inter Utility Coordinating Council, to hold a workshop with the City Manager and staff on the proposed Street Cut Policy and Ordinance. The workshop was held on Tuesday, August 2, 2005. Staff is currently working on several issues that were brought up at the workshop and will report back to the council at the September 8, 2005 meeting. Since this was an advertised public hearing, it is less expensive for the city to continue the public hearing to a specific date than to re-advertise the public hearing. BACKGROUND The City of Grand Terrace established its current guideline for"Specifications for Construction Within Public Right-of-Way"under the 1990 State of California manual of Traffic Controls (see Exhibit"A"). This guideline established by the city engineer(GTMC 12.08.220) dictates how contractors/utility companies cut into our public right-of-ways (e.g. streets and sidewalks) by trenching, removing pavement and asphalt, and restoring existing improvements. Staff has been working since the fall of 2004 to develop a more comprehensive street cut policy that helps maintain the integrity of our roads and balances the interests of the public utilities. The new street cut policy and ordinance was a culmination of the following: • Researching other city's street-cut specifications • Meetings with utility officials • Working with paving contractors (-'0UNCfL AGENDA � • Combining the"Best Management Practices"for a new street-cut policy i Highlights of the new street cut policy and ordinance: • Failure to obtain a permit will result in a$1,000 fine with the exception of emergency situations for public utilities and their contractors • Contractors that perform sub-standard patching will be subject to $1,000 fine per occurrence and be responsible for correcting the patch per the street-cut specifications. Public utilities and their contractors will not be exempt. • Jagged cuts will no longer be acceptable and all patches must be squared off • All patches must ground a minimum of 1 foot outside each edge of the trench and overlaid flush with the existing surface. • The city will notify all utilities of any major street work at least six months in advance. No street cuts by the utilities (other than for emergencies)will be allowed for two years. If a non-emergency street cut is made by a utility in the notified area, the utility will responsible for replacement of a portion or the entire area---to be determined by the City Engineer. i RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED STREET CUT POLICY AND'ORDINANCE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8, 2005. i i i i i I i i i ' d ELT r RAND TERR C - Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: August 11,2005 CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM(X) SUBJECT: Measure I Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2005-2010 FUNDING REQUIRED M Background: Adopted by San Bernardino County voters in 1989,Measure I is a major source of revenue for transportation improvements in the City of Grand Terrace. This 20-year half-cent sales tax has provided over$1.9 million for Grand Terrace street repairs,reconstruction,striping,and slurry sealing. The estimated Measure I Revenue for FY 05-06 is$188,866. In the fourth quarter of every year,the City is required to update our Measure I CIP in order to continue to receive Measure I Funds. Included in the annual funding are projects deemed necessary by staff. These projects can be changed mid-year with a resolution from City Council. Additionally,the San Bernardino Association of Governments(SCAG)is requesting that the City of Grand Terrace provide documentation to clarify the policy approach for the expenditure of Measure I funds. Below is a Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for 2005 as submitted for approval,by the city council: The City of Grand Terrace's existing road network is fairly well established. Therefore,the City's primary use of Measure I funds will be for the reconstruction and maintenance of existing City streets. It is the City's intent to design and begin construction of the project the same year the project is identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Recommendation: Staff requests the City Council to approve the Five Year Measure I Projects for the FY 2005-10 and the Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for 2005. Cop N1,C�L A E Nm DA ITE M N;0,, U�, Resolution No. 2005- I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November, j 1989, authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the county of San Bernardino, and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of the Authority, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance require each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction, and WHEREAS,the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan has been previously adopted, and is on file with the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG); I NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1) The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. l� 2) In case of an emergency, such as flooding or other major necessary road expenses,these funds could be reallocated. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California,hereby adopts the Measure I Five-year Capital Improvement Program. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California at a regular meeting held on the 1 l 'day of August, 2005; ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. And of the City Council thereof. I i Resolution No. 2005- I,BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at aregular meeting ofthe City Council ofthe City of Grand Terrace held on the 11`h day of August, 2005,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney ------------- ------- ----- - ----------f ---------Ci{Y-of GraacLTacrace PROPOSED MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2005/2010 Au ust 119 2005 YEAR STREET & LIMITS IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 2005-06 Crack Sealing Program Vivienda Ct $20,000 Carhart Ave Holly Drive Arilss Drive r Minona Drive Finch St Lark Street Franklin Way Ladera Raven Tanager Flamingo 2005-06 City Wide-Slurry Program Type II Vivienda Ct $1,747-54 Carhart Ave $4,049.21 Holly Drive $6,023.38 Arilss Drive $17,043.10 Minona Drive $5,812.47 Finch St $4,774.95 Lark Street $4,261.43 Franklin Way $1,296.90 Ladera $3,674.55 Raven $2,858.42 Tanager $2,858.42 Flamingo $3,674.55 Total =$58,074.92 2005-06 Union Pacific Railroad Bride at Barton Road I Replacement and widening of Bride $140,000 1 ' 2005-06 City Wide— Striping Program ng Program - $80,000 -East/West Barton Road -North South'Mt.Vernon -East/West Pico -East/West Van Buren- -East/West DeBerry -EasttWest Main Street -North/South Oriole -North/South Michigan -All street markings within the city limits 2006-07 City Wide—Slurry Program Slurry Program $90,000 2006-07 Mt Vernon from Main Street to VamBuren Pavement Rehab-OS $132,000 2007-08 -City Wide=Slurry Program Slurry Program $95,000 2007-08 Mt. Vernon from De Berry to Van Buren Pavement Rehab—OS . $123,000 2007-08 Ladera to Vivienda Pavement Rehab—OS $33,000 2007-08_ City Wide Striping Program Striping Program $90,000 2007-08 Raven Way to Vivienda Pavement Rehab OS $36,000 2007-08 Eton from Minona to Preston_ Pavement Rehab—OS $38,000 2008-09 City Wide Slurry Program Slurry Program $95,000_ 2008-09 Kingston from Minona to Arliss Pavement Rehab—OS -$31,000 2009-10 Brentwood,-Holly to Thames Pavement Rehab—OS $45,500 2009-10 City Wide Striping Program Striping Program $85,000 2009-10 City Wide Slurry Program Slurry Program $95,000 TBA Eton south of Arliss to Miriam Pavement Rehab—OS TBA TBA Flamingo Street - Pavement Rehab=OS TBA TBA - Pico St from Oriole to Blue Mtn Ct -Pavement Rehab—OS TBA Contact: Steve Berry SANBAG's Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 yrs.) $1,002,122 909=430-2226 Fund Balance as of June 30, 2005 $97,843 TOTAL AVAILABLE: $1,099,965 2 ,AT Y, . RAND!ERR C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: August 11,2005 CRA ITEM (_ ) COUNCIL ITEM (X SUBJECT: REDLINING 350,FT OF CURBING FOR A SCHOOL BUS STOP AND ADJACENT CORNER AT 22111 NEWPORT AVENUE NO FUNDING REQUIRED (X) BACKGROUND Citizen's Patrol and the owners of the Grand Royal Estates have approached staff concerning the parking situation in front of 221,11 Newport Avenue. Large trucks and cars park in front of the Grand Royal Estates blocking-visibility of exiting cars and make it difficult for school buses to safely pickup and'drop off children. Staff met with the Citizen's Patrol and the owners of the Grand Royal Estates onsite and have determined that 350 ft of curb needs to be painted red to meet the needs of the children and the mobile home tenants. Attached is a diagram of the area with the red curbing highlighted.' RECOMMENDATION: STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL TO ALLOW THE CITY TO PAINT RED ZONES WITH A TOTAL COMBINED LENGTH OF 350 FT. IN FRONT OF 22111 NEWPORT AVENUE. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No.ia,01 .. .i�;'ts •w^' _i`3 ,,Y`�..e±^. '- !, rMosm �� ,C y�,�� i yr � >' ,.� {• '.+y..`: `s '_j:;"x''ad` r:.. ,3a,,� �',q` � .'�'' cr' ,>,y'. xj Asa, Y,;,:' •S r•+ ds`+ '."i" •rx' `iK%,'ti�c��,':,�' va .,�,�. ,`+. '�,,;._,i �.rf\•, �'4'�,f?$` ;1�°` '�Y:'r` w,- "'ti'� rs"J r.K, F�'.� •� ..,fe J�.... .r:;•„+-.;"�.: ,,�1.+Sry J, r <"+ ��t�,t'` ."\L;�?a'`:s `T.i:'•- ;,,•,„�! r :.i#}:�r`.,> ....-yr >v��W'i' yt f�;^*�5.:' a.� <ta. ':";.`• .`N ``� _ 1'tii ",R _ t r, -.� ,�, •,'�r.. -`` A^'�i--''.; tB. +'a fi}+ .I,r`.� + �,;..gr'. " r 4�'�+.�, it ;�'` 4 '"'Fw�+. .R�,r".,;.w. .r. `�' *."k' <�'-n,, r�.`'1•," 1.14r.t^�•' :l `'••;^` ;.'.y J-.,.� :`, ,;\ i ,;a t:. � 3�`f ,ty; ,� '._`�;.. '� ',a' '~ Gam',: S^,.p n. .'`;<,:. +• ,�-" =.�`,"£a,�y; .,� _t ti�tsf3'�: � � �. .��` .::T;« -!� `•:%Y`y '. ,;:.,a, �.y r�' "".r• t�`(+w;t .:l.�;,"`v' - - �.jy ;4 i::'�'f i� �v' "/ h�vf,�."'`,+„,,, ::i 'ii�, r3'x� "� '`��5 _re-.'"'•Y a �'�}:. ,fl:5 .,$'i, rF d \•"�4�^'"7'`' Yk�";:,t 4G�4.a 'Y• 'h`+, o�yC:*eY'q! ?:tcrca �K x�:�j,'/. ' ,��' is •�s�+`.a„ l , @-„�,��`a'',-,.,' f„ r .�H,:; .q -,!' C Qyy;.r° .I:.. `k'e 15:1 +; �r,�".'•,*tc t,,�'' 3 ..1 Jr'„?r : rti, ,F - a,?.x;i��.;. i�?„ •I=. :�; ..'i. - _ •7 ''�,.:':.t,... .�•�. �"Y •rt•'r.-;' '"� �' nth :;��,; =,�i:zr; ^{�': r'��' ".� •�'p - �^4-',',,,, .,�,,.r •,n� �r �t,,,,. .a f-4�- i''�'i ',�.' Sri'," •y; 1# w t ?�� pC'. '# � � uv I'lyN i�'�4 .� '' :., �,.��;' ;.•,-^ %` '..'�.,♦ '.•''_�f. `'rl' �`ri rk.� � a .�Y;�Y ,,;•:., f,. ;:, �r. r..i�, �'°'� � '�iW�� ;s"� ::�� •K^• - ,iiJ..�' „`.§' A:,':gy�{)y '�•31f. ;��`S.t� �J:�;�' _.'v._ �:t'..:v. .'y:,:a �:'« � :�.'_ p.s �•"'S� ?�,x=::'*" •. sF'r •Eh h ..aE•'..:. bi--.yVy�y,.it{,• �. ..`^F"`.t' i� �43,^. '.;. t w3 p^ 'W r-� �i r 1'!!'�""'`-•�; .. �w•'Y':r a ♦ :*.S a '�`� r.r ,.t�� . ;� 4 *, � '�;'`fir ,�a. r'dt�R� �" `` Yii,, _,;�:` 'µ"it_,',�"•' "=r:+?'{. a:;: � � '` �: r' S2r:`.R`,`nt:,,"?i4,.� l,Y�t7',,; t.L•'�, ;aS?' `,g; �j' •'�.�, 1 ",7.... ! 1...:{�i{��,.�z�;. <�'�:.taa,,u,.;F �.'":+�y:t. - ;v{'•,�,t�, "!`' R'�;.��, C �- `'�t;"?d�"��?�,'.4,., >�$<'. r, e, �m •�r>�.m_ d.;r'�is+{yy5 •••.,. .S„a� ,�� pn7F,' :.�g'.S`�-'"�r�'$~�_ # �R`; A J :\, �£ ; r�:,,i s i •r 1 w �4\ -t ^+ ''',,s�'y C_#3y�4' ,��,e+� S`a` S.;! 's'-}',.y,„.9 E} i lYf'R ,l �a «�� '.-sk,�f!- iK�.ly.x �;•,jltL ,<'t' 1. .§�T.P;H .Y. `_��4� .., �� ,.g'�.�, {{ �.3�* ,�`C�` 'r ''a y ,� �.'•v,.�,, f y ,,�'F�.y'"i?X � ':r, �"72 .ek::y... k.t� 1<, <t;.r�,�•v• .,f',I ••,��. � �:v 4� j,,..i '�!t"F T. .;�: +S". .�,k;,r yr{.c,, ;�,� r,K y:,,,.,r,°•� �;�,:R �«.,;a'x'-:r; qv„ "� .3^'L'' - ,.?a�`.{ ".` 4'�*y+m: �+ ;'Tx• s��..p:,rt`C,`"sc, •.'>r�, F. �, ,,.� >b. .�,a' r? .,� •:ey;':L ,j�:`i a>�=' (^ .,.,,•;°I`r 3<,}:.�>P •+; :��' r�,. � ..,,y` c..4:'�"` '�"'r• -t'aa't,'� �,'"5• "'' .'flti� �`t'~:,s a „i;?s•,. `tip. ,J,' ,�<- t•„��?'"'ti'',;"r3'. :�� '.- .�'' :vit•'f& -:!k".a.' �r r,",�,;;_ 5+',�:`' aG.� ,t v�ax� �pf•.i � r"r%r�";r,„. s.'.,.rY.. .�-ry.'a��.lh� t``:..•, >-Y°�2-'" ';4* � ..L �� 'F�.Y� r.+L �,, •r ..i,� 1..f; ':'t' 'waY.' 'h�-r._; ,.��, zs., ,a,..�ad' ,.a ".•7��•�+. Y'Y.°.,�/•'N' ,.,...c.rt -2•;."��,�S;J>. ! ;"r ''� :"'" ';n ,qp,�a, yy- 1!.^'��•`s�i •:;" •dq»i:kx:- m ,y ,•-�• �d+a.,:�'s, 1y,�^p'�<,. �*a';.:d, •s i� 's�^s'�� ':.� � '`+iF,. .t; •.�4� :•5= e �s ,,.v .,; ,ls„z"�""�i " !$:*,;:� :'"';' ar•"•,��d °�„Xs .2,5 ° ``AX' �'G5;��.�`�.,;'<n,� ° +�J,i t.�:�,,'fir. SS 'S .1r,v _ _ `J�, .3: �t'�✓�` ,>. Y�"'rt:S `:.'."a ,r 'ta.;.;� 'sue ;a„"�,:., tzi .�3' v�'' •" 'r;,�,� 'hc,.,. ^a� ,.�4 �� 3, .::'Et'Y v, l: 2" -w,- ;h'aiy�;a,�y: dr.,tnY:: .f. .t .,,�? { r' .SSa ..''ir'. r ix ',�''�7'"'.,, a`�`" \ krv'hM,:t ".t+ � �.'`.yX(•��.`w t: L�`-J', i �� ' �lF L'�'r S'�' plaSi t:: .hA w�'� 'i4,. � n y,,. i*°�•4i' { .,'4. - :i,+ Y ."11''., F'`-,.�. �2+�"`n" „x.:h�,'� a ,,. t^�?{�w.. �,. S J ,} .+4,;x +•:r• rlt y7Yrrt�44 #�� :�i'` t' '�""a'x. h__"":•'"" tti.. ,t<�+..i, ..d'• T Ms � {`0!��:� �'In`K`8'�..'i 3`'; ,A u - "rv-. `'4ya,.. �{�s;i(�`t. .r. S�" .,',#<'-' •�"' ,.C3,"",:ry� ,��i+�� ..t' i ;.t�y�, ."r' �,:x 8'E 'n�• `'�i.•.- :,'+` `b"4,<.�h - i "� ?.,.s., -z f: I>�;c'`:5�.`,•',�,�,„1�^^v.«a=*.,a.�..'C�� + ""q"�-x c 'i=>.y' A4µt.n 'ice L'�„,, m w:.n 't.,�`"`^i",.�"^>ti>'na Yw F :. 7, .so%,,.s-t �,':aA+:.•t«r'+:c.,�„""`, ,��. �, � t,s'�;f'� `°M. gt4ar .3.- "' gym'at - `3�+�,};,"V�,, ,..r, .,`' �x ,..�; _","* ::d "`�t•'� .t:s:�t;`.;.�,'� .��=`','+Y;.f:-• ',% T¢: a vN: 'c a ''.� 3R; ,-t ti�`� � ,."«'=�.:� :p�+' s,-_ ��w�t%"• °''» ,.' �:? .5":'�'• �,.-t��` i« Y' .k'��' z Y'+,' .4cr .�% i��•,a d,° `� �;�" ^i.l�{�'q'.+�"�i. •'��r4. �) '� '�a' ;�^ e fa' k., 7's:�;,'t�•fi�''Y'.a�,•,.. � � � '�': x'.r "`�C: �+:%,, `� .l,. •l?y1{ 1 7, `:e;' R: 'el � yjS: P,- PY 'A �'"k "^rw. ,;}r, w �.�}. .�+'k _? -r�,�, 3' ;a<-„;y;s:�. <,.,,:T• ��,� �c'�.' � 14 yR' �,tll ''S ! �; �,,, r..�y.r.N :.�.. `u�ia;;i rw; 3S"'3�...,^+2�'�•� .<'i„� '"�^ �', .7�v,.'"'w^Lr='a:"- r �dL,�> :',F". h ,•F-•�:,,rv_. ,r y'"•'C:: 'iu.^yi-„� c nor" %6 a .,a�,rS .5, � ,v, 1� '+d�;,�_-,�i' y�, t, xa�n' t _w, t" Y ,.,.»;, .'.k5-':,. ,La°ili.�y`:�.�;,�-:;.t..�tr'a:E;rgs•,. �.+: '�'�•.� 1 i .x� _ f.1,..wir` �y^^""y°,' .,Y iG`.t r'M1:°F't`'i")�:^.1:';''"''�i•:. K:. ./(/ :-k' =" F g .rx "'Y4,.5, •;dl5}t„•; .s�..:°ri: +r Ni- Nw SM "" .��;; ','+'�#.��".' .;.� •lam' ��l w r"'fi.y: .}•" S�'=y •''�<;.:;'�L:).Y' F•''ass: i` w:h x;'"'a � �"�,�� P'' Y:"� `'' `^°'.'t3^'^,„ .�r{az .�,�..,i«,a,,,�, ,.br, `+�-. :e�5°' j';!Apr; i "t°' �Cxt;S",`,'�..r,•?„"� "a.^•f'f++ _ f.' n;y 'S.F. ++".�r. .c,i,'`�,.r.""•�'"cd`s a.' �°.'�.- +'*•.,y .'nrX-;�<.?';:�i;'"'";;•�� i„ :v'?��. .� }.c w i. -'• -dax�, ?:xr>�<-- ,�. �*"•'��'•�.. �,�} .-?" ,�, .vi x�d}} .:�,� � '*'"^+'�Sr��c,s�• _•�°-��. x''£;�.,,:'. - ,r. r^ ,.yy,,,<°.>sE%'#d �'`4 r :3„�� .,� .'.�._•' ,+,,#`.:�•,,�2"ax '`"vs, 'ri -:i••- l� '`;r r•„ "YF^✓?. `:M"�., as;fx.,,as.''-:i,'Xu'>,. _ ",i.i�, �?��„„',.�',yam. .;,r.-S" ;.`� - i'� •�... a's" ;..�i+.,"?t2.0, � +''',Z_ �`.' ' �,tl�<tI1F� x'xi '.,g:'- ix. jS � th+' a .'„'',}i'19.7'.'s"z'v,^-.rK.' i r,.;'^; y '="� % r�„; +; f rs:7f>zz..;?°„?•.s - .,ti� � �'�;;' xgxw f. Frc, -'Y,Y.jam, '_ a5 ..•3•.r.,'X,y •k" r!�E-:tii '°� it6.x'z &.:�¢;1i<' t .Yt.: .�s�y"`'w ,A+,,..�;.Sfi. ^ter tip .^fir,''r �°�.�<... �a� �'�,.� 4,}y,t ,' ,.r +„�.,A•, +" 4-. y ��.,+>,�1,�.•:""- :'!"' ..*K :>�'" % `' .'iy '"� ��-'S`3.Y9'"Yy�^,a.:C; ;eF• K �'^n,". ft' u;, r' ?,Y-�;'a: ^}cti r 3 .�. ,:'4 '� ,4- :.b• .��. q W:�f' .�.rrg�e Rn: +h•+L�"� n;.,+K;,"r.e: as`r yyyy ^Spf..:y �e,,}'r�z a'w}",¢,t'^'' F �3'.�,�.,."�:g:%+'1. �ah'� :� 'ws:�+. + '� w�}�i s�'ti r+, ��". •a: '�l a'G •;'i"r:,^ .r :iil'i;N 5,,..�r.'¢c`1.{'"' ,rf'.'"+ �,�!'"C �.' �•u�'"r�'"" � ._'+.q'}u, .S+ yyd �k� p}t-a ,ra;. ..ty� .r°a ^�°�„ `� tF ��, .''ti'kiy ��' �.' ;+� � �., ytk��,.A .S3 "4?��' 4a�' .;�'.F � ^�1 x 'fit~: "wv4i;""`r.� •. - -R „` '�s ",� `!�egrj;,,, �d r' `, ss'¢�� i .+zd' .�. ��,+-t.-ai,"�+.,x w a��"" e,;r""«" '� i'!""a•..tm".: -.r.+ � COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 23 JUNE 2005 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: CRIME-PREVENTION DATE: 19 MAY 2005 PROBLEM: 1. A SAFETY PROBLEM EXISTS'AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE GRAND ROYAL MOBILE PARK ON�NEWPORT AVENUE. 2. MANY CHILDREN LIVE AT THIS PARK AND ARE PICKED UP AND DROPPED OFF BY SCHOOL BUSSES AT THIS SITE. 3. VEHICLES PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NEWPORT CREATES PROBLEMS OF VISIBILITY AS WELL AS A NARROWING OF THE STREET TO TRAFFIC. PROPOSED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL AND OR STAFF 1. CONSIDERATION OF CONTROLLED PARKING ON NEWPORT FOR VISIBILITY PURPOSES. 2. A BUS ZONE BE CREATED FOR SO MANY FEET ON THE SOUTHWEST CURB OF NEWPORT AT THE ENTRANCE. 3. A RED CURB BE PAINTED FOR SO MANY FEET ON THE SOUTHEAST CURB AT THIS ENTRANCE. STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: August 11, 2005 SUBJECT: APPOINT VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for October 6-8 in San Francisco. The Business Meeting will be held on Saturday, October 8"', at 10:30 a.m. at the San Francisco Moscone Convention Center West. The League is asking that each City Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business Meeting to vote on conference resolutions. Each City is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League Policy. Staff Recommends Council: APPOINT A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE WHO WILL REPRESENT THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AT THIS YEAR'S LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE BUSINESS SESSION on COUNCIL AGENDA M NO. i ` f Headquarters Southern California Ofiee I !} LEAGUE 1400 K STREET - 602 East Huntington Dr.,Ste._C OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO,CA 95814 Monrovia,CA 91016 rx:(916)658-8200 rx:(626)305-131'S 3 CITIES I Fx:(916)658-8240 Fx:(626)305-1345_ ' E - WW'X.CACITIES.ORG i July 6, 2005 r To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council i r From: Pat Eklund, League President, Council Member, Novato Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for 2005 League Annual Conference The League's 2005 Annual'Conference is scheduled for Thursday,-October 6 through Saturday October 8 in San, Francisco. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the Annual Business Meeting on Saturday, October 8th, at 10:30 a.m. at the San Francisco Moscone Convention Center West. To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city . council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the Annual Business Meeting. A voting card will be given to the city official that is designated and indicated on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed form to the League's Sacramento office at the jearliest possible time (not later than Monday, September 6, 2005), so that proper r records may be established for the conference. j .The city's designated voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting j Card desk located in the League registration area. The Desk will be open on October 6, 7, and 8. Voting cards should be picked up before the Annual Business Meeting on f October 8th. The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of,this memo. I , Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. I I i LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA - CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in-his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate, or alternate, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card desk in the conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is permitted. r , 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card"table in the League Registration Area. At the Business Meeting, exchanges-tray be made at the "Voting Card"table in the front of the meeting room. Exchanges may not be made while a roll call vote is in progress because the Credentials Committee will be conducting the roll call. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials who are authorized to use the city's voting card, and who have left a sample of their signature on file for the Credentials Committee, will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee-will determine the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting.