The URL can be used to link to this page

08/25/2005 ( C1TY / GRAM TERR CE .' -'August 25,2005 . 22795'Bartoli Road Grand Terrace California 92343-5295 1r Civic Center ; - (909)824-6,621 Faz(909j 783-7629 Fax(909)783-2600 `Maryetta Ferrc CITY OF _GRAN_ D' TERRACE t - Mayor , ' - - r ; !Bea CorteS. Mayor Pro Tem _ C"CI_T_V COUNCIL IIcrman Hilkey` Lee Ann Garcia 'REGULAR MEETLNGS - Jigt Miller Council Members - •' r - - r = , • Thomas J.-Schwab _ 2ND'AND,,4TH_Thursday'= 6:.00 p:m. t� City Diannger 'Co'uncil Chambers, ; Grand Ter-race.Civic'Center '22795,Barton,R6ad ; CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 25, 2005 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 PM 22795 Barton Road THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH.THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES AGT OF 1990;=IF=YOIJ„ REQUIRE.SPECIAL.ASSI5TANCE'TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING' PLEASE CALL:THE';CITY CLERKS OFFICE AT:(909)824-6621;ATLEAST 48 HOURS;PRIOR:TO THE MEETING. = . ,'< .. „IF.YOU"DESIRE.TO`ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURINGTHE MEETING,,PLEASEtOMPLETE,A=REQUEST TO SPEAK-FORM A:VAII�A 3LE ATTHE ENTRANCE A1Vp:PRESENT:IT:TO THE CITY-,CLERK.SPEAKERS .BE CALLED UPON.BY;THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TI1VhE: ; .. * Call to Order- * Invocation- * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 08-11-2005 Minutes Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Robert J. Nava, Esq., Assistant Vice Chancellor, UCR - Update on UC Riverside 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. - A. Approve Check Register Dated August 25,2005 Approve B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda C. Approval of 08-11-2005 Minutes Approve i COUNCIL AGENDA 08-25-2005 PAGE 2 OF 2 I AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION 4. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,the City Council is prohibited from discussing or acting on any item not on the agenda. The Mayor may request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment. 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports-None B. Council Reports i 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Appeal of SA-05-06/E-05-04 (Manhole Builders) Applications for a Site and Architectural,and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office and the conversion of an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Award of the 2005-06 Street Striping Contract to the lowest Award Bidder Determined by Staff from the August 22, 2005 Bid Opening B. Award of the Street Slurry Contract to American Asphalt Award South,Inc.for the 2005-06 Slurry Seal Program C. Award of the Asphalt Crack Sealing Contract to Roadworks, Award Inc. 9. CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 AT 6:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 09-08-2005 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 09-01-2005. �I PEKD�U G C W APPRO"04L CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-AUGUST 11, 2005 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on August 11, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Chairman Bea Cortes,Vice-Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Lee Ann Garcia, Agency Member Jim Miller, Agency Member Tom Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry,Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Jerry Glander,Building & Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director ABSENT: Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriffs Department John Harper, City Attorney J APPROVAL OF 07-14-2005 MINUTES CRA-2005-22 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER GARCIA, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN CORTES,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the July 14,2005 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes. REPORT ON CLOSE OF ESCROW(21974 DEBERRY STREET) Cily Manager Schwab, stated that this is an information item only. He reported that the property at 21974 DeBerry Street closed escrow on July 20, 2005. The sale price was four hundred fourteen thousand dollars and the Agency agreed to pay expenses of fourteen thousand six hundred fifty eight dollars fora total consideration of four hundred twenty eight thousand six hundred and fifty eight dollars. Agency Member Hilkey, indicated that he wanted to make it very clear that he was not supportive of this purchase. He stated that what is reported is only half of the deal. He is concerned that only have of the purchase is being reported and not the entire 1.2 million dollar purchase. He would hope that in the fare the entire volume of the purchase will be grouped together and reported on. l CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. i i Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes August 11,2005 Page 2 Chairman Ferr6 adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:15 p.m., until the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday,August 25, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace i i Check Register 7 ted August 25,22005 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1 Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56041 8/4/2005 0,07402 USPS/NEOPOST PROCESSING POSTAGE POSTAGE FOR NEW MAIL MACHINE v 10-190-211-000-000 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 56042 8/4/2005 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 072905 PERS FOR PAYROLL END 7 29 05 10-022-62-00 12,068.83 Total : 12,068.33 56043 8/5/2005 006315 ROLLINS, RICHARD July, 2005 July Open/Close/Clean Parks 10-450-245-'000-000 1,201.25 Total : 1,201125 56044 8/5/2005 010344 WOLFPACK INS. SERVICES TRUST Sept., 2005 DENTAL INS B CORTES 10-110-120-000-000 61.00 Total : 61.00 56045 8/8/2005 , 010164 GREAT-WEST def comp 7 05 DEF COMP 7 05 LOANS 8 05 10-022-64-00 3,297.64 - 10-022-63-00 15,385.16 Total : 18,682.80 56046 8/10/2005 004587 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 80105 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 10-120-142-000-000 11.15 10-125-142-000-000 11.15 10-140-142-000-000 16.68 10-172-142-000-000 2.91 10-175-142-000-000 2.35 10-180-142-000-000 16.70 10-370-142-000-000 7.73 10-380-142-000-000 5.58 10-440-142-000-000 156.08 10-450-142-000-000 5.58 21-572-142-000-000 5.57 32-370-142-000-000 2.35 34-400-142-000-000 18.52 34-800-142-000-000 11.15 Page: 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No.jj� -------- -------- --- vc ist __ -___--_Voucher-List - Page:-----2--- 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56046 8/10/2005 004587 ,MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK (Continued) Total : 273.50 56047 ,8/10/2005 005452 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA PACIFICARE PACIFICARE HEALTH INS 10-450-142-000-000 222.85 10-022-61-00 6,254.73 34-400-142-000-000 1,250.58 10-440-142-000-000 726.89 32-370-142-000-000 153.48 10-120-142-000-000 599.32 10-125-142-000-000 445.70 10-140-142-000-000 1,028.31 10-172-142-000-000 260.96 10-175-142-000-000 208.77 10-180-142-000-000 676.52 10-370-142-000-000 537.19 10-380-142-000-000 265.43 21-572-142-000-000 - 299.65 1 Total : 12,930.38 56b48 8/10/2005 006772 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY std STANDARD INS- LIFE AND DISABILITY 10-120-142-000-000 19:50 10-125-142-000-000 11.75 10-140-142-000-000 19.50 10-172-142-000-000 3.26 10-175-1142-000-000 2.60 10-180-142-000-000 18.88 10-370-142-000-000 9.10 10-380-142-000-000 6.50 10-440-142-000-000 70.25 10-450-142-000-000 6.50 21-572-142-000-000 5•87 32-370-142-000-000 2.60 34-400-142-000-000 21.44 34-800-142-000-000 13:00 10-022-63-00 2,435.27 Total : 2,646.02 1 Page: 2 vchlist ,Voucher List Page: 3 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account- Amount 56049 8/10/2005 003420 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SVCS dental aug 05 DENTAL AUGUST 05 > 10-022-63-00 1,032.62 Total : 1,032.62 56050 8/10/2005 010287 OF ALBA B. ZAMPEZE 1988 TRUST,ALB/Pmt#4 Pmt#4-22799 Barton Rd. - 32-600-209-000-000 11,205.59 Total : 11,205.59 56051 8/10/2005 007803 ARAMARK 57731946-1 Maint uniform pants 16-900-254-000-000 63.93 Total : 63.93 56052 8/10/2005 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 08 0178 5 CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 19.44 Total : 19.44 56053 8/15/2005 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY July, 2005 July Street Lights 16-510-238-000-000 3,569.48 26-600-238-000-000 49.80 26-601-238-000-000 41.50 26-602-238-000-000 58.10 Total : 3,718.88 56054 8/16/2005 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 1966694880 July cell phones-B &S 34-400-235-000-000 115.97 Total : 115.97 56055 8/16/2005 010079 CASH 21992 DEB close PURCHASE OF 21992 DEBERRY 32-600-214-000-000 890,674.00 Total : 890,674.00 56056 8/25/2005 001001 AA EQUIPMENT CO. INC. 09 7339108 REPAIR& PURCHASE 10-450-246-000-000 226.62 l Total : 226.62 56057 8/25/2005 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW Aug. 2005 Aug. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Page: 3 we—is __ Voucher Lis# Page:— 4--- 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56057 8/25/2005 '001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW (Continued) Total : 50.00 56058 8/25/2005 010459 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 285033 July Emergency Animal Services 10-190-256-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56059 8/25/2005 007803 ARAMARK 57855646-1 MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS - 16-900-254-000-000 192.89 Total : 192.89 56060 8/25/2005 001365 BARBU, DRAGOS S. 08032005 Reimburse ESRI S. Diego Expenses 10-380-270-000-000 408.03 Total : 408.03 56061 8/25/2005 001383 BARR DOOR INC. 7556 Shed roll-up door repair 10-180-245-000-000 188.10 Total : 188.10 56062 8/25/2005 010526 BIG O TIRES 00018191 VEHICLE MAINT FOR CITY VEHICLES - 10-180-272-000-000 374.28 Total : 374.28 56063 8/25/2005 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 7898191957508 July fuel 16-900-254-000-000 242.51 10-180-272-000-000 945.57 Total : 1,188.08 56064 8/25/2005 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM Aug. 2005 Aug. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 60.00 56065 8/25/2005 010147 CORTES, BEA Aug. 2005 Aug. Council/Agency Stipend 32-200-120-000-000 - 150.00 10-1-10-120-000-000 189.00 Total : 339.00 56066 8/25/2005 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B840683 PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER 10-370-230-000-000 258.30 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 f 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56066 8/25/2005 001930 DAILY-JOURNAL CORPORATION (Continued) Total : 258.30 56067 8/25/2005 001937- DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY 704272272 COPIER CHARGES 10-172-246-000-000 22.03 10-175-246-000-000 27.54 34-400-246-000-000 60.58 Total : 110.16 56068 8/25/2005 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 01.5641/929659f SUPPLIES -- 10-180-245-000-000 22.83 - 5268/9296339 SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 28.51 10-440-245-000-000 0.31 - 10-180-245-000-000 2.21 10-440-245-000-000 3.97 8378/6043534 SUPPLIES 10-805-245-000-000- 12.94 10-180-245-000-000 26.21 10-805-245-000-000 1.00 10-180-245-000-000 2.03 9082/5043648 SUPPLIES 10-805-245-000-000 7.97- 10-180-245-000-000 8.97 10-805-245-000-000 0.62 10-180-245-000-000 0.69 Total : 118.26 56069 8/25/2005 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 5891 ON GOING WEED CONTROL AT CITY PARKS - 10-450-245-000-000 500.00 Total : 500.00 56070 8/25/2005 002275, ESRI 91775957 Arc GIS 3D Analyst license 10-380-250-000-000- 2,500.00 10-380-250-000-000 193.75 Total : 2,693.75 56071 8/25/2005 002276 ESSCO-GRAND TERRACE INC. 2401940-00 Venture lamps Page: 5 _ vchlist __Voucher_List _ Page:-6 - 08/16/2006 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56071 8/25/2005 002276 ESSCO-GRAND TERRACE INC. (Continued) 10-450-2457000-000 305.17 Total : 305.17 56072 8/25/2005 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA Aug. 2005 Aug. Council/Agency Stipend - 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 t 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 - - Total :-- - -400A0 56073 8/25/2005 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4568-AD BLUE MT.OUTLOOK 10-125-213=000-000 '- 620.00 Total : 620.00 56074 -8/25/2005 002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN Auq. 2005 Aug. Council/Agency Stipend 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120=000-000 218.65 Total : 368.65 56075 8/25/2005 010153 GCS WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT X69668 STREET SWEEPER MAINTENANCE 16-900-254-000-000 1,432.75 Total : 1,432.75 56076 8/25/2005 010181 GOPHER PATROL July, 2005 GOPHER ERADICATION SERVICE 10-450-245-000-000 465.00 10-190-719-000-000 45.00 Total : 510.00 56077 .8/25/2005- 003020 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORM COMPANY 63976 CITIZEN PATROL UNIFORM - 14-411-223-000-000 109.48 14-411-223-000-000. Total : 113.35 56078 8/25/2005 010039 GREER OWENS, BARRIE 08032005 Code Enf. Uniform 34-'800-218-000-000 43.09 Total : 43.09 56079 8/25/2005 003152 HARPER& BURNS LLPN,_ July, 2005 July professional services 10-160-250-000-000 1,076.25 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa J Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56079 8/25/2005 003152' HARPER & BURNS LLPN (Continued) Total : `1,076.25 56080 8/25/2005 003178 HENAGON LTD COLTON 37384 15T 3/4 rock 16-900-254-000-000 259.14 Total : 259.14 56081 8/25/2005 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN Aug. 2005 Auq. Council/Agency Stipend 32-200A 20-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 400.00 56082 8/25/2005 003213 HONEYWELL ACS SERVICE 818622 Repl C. Care condenser fan motor 10-440-246-000-000 756.92 819278 Repl fusible disconnect-C. Care 10-440-246-000-000 779.69 820450 Repair leak-zone 5 10-180"245-000-000 - 893.94 Total : 2,430.55 56083 8/25/2005 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 4040224-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 224.10 4040224-01 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 - 210.93 Total : 435.03 56084 8/25/2005 010528 ISI POLY S1172509.001 Graffiti Remover 10-180-245-000-000 60.62 Total : 60.62 56085 8/25/2005 003850 JANI-KING "08050072 BUILDING CLEANING 10-440-244-000-000 815.00 Total : 815.00 56086 8/25/2005 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 182-78 LAWNMOWER REPAIRS 10-180-246-000-000 146.70 3749 Sweeper parts 16-900-254-000-000 88.33 Page: 7 —__v-chlist _ V-oucher-List-- -- -P-age- 8---- 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56086 8/25/2005 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER (Continued) , 3793 LAWNMOWER REPAIRS 10-180-246-000-000 30.13 Total : 265.16 56087 8/25/2005 004350 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, INLANC 08012005 Annual Dues-2005/2006 10-190-265-000-000 600.00 Total : -600.00 56088 8/25/2005 010367 LOMA LINDA UNIV. HEALTH CARE July, 2005 NEW HIRE PHYSICALS & EMP INSS 10-190-224-000-000 216.00 June, 2005 June employee physicals - 10-190-224-000-000 98.00 Total : -314.00 56089 8/25/2005 004620 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS July-7FW59001 July phone charges-EOC 10-808-235-000-000 35.88 Total : 35.88 56090 8/25/2005 010446 MILLER, JIM Aug. 2005 Aug. Council/Agency Stipend 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Iota!': 400.00 56091 8/25/2005 010530 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. P122949500017 Safety glasses&gloves _ 1 0-1 80-218-000-000 158.12 Total : 158.12 56092 8/25/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 116475 Office supplies 10-140-210-000-000 26.78 -120527 Office supplies 10-140-210-000-000 21.44 154755 Fax Toner 10-190-210-000-000 65.29 907006 Office supplies 10-110-210-000-000 16.88 Page: 8 r vchlist Voucher List _ Page: 9 68/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa. Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56092 8/25/2005 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY (Continued) 959783 Office supplies u 10=110-210-000-000 75.00 Total : 205.39 56093 8/25/2005 010244 OTWELL'S AUTO &TIRE CENTER 027315 Maint'97 Toyota E995717 10-180-272-000-000 796.97 Total : 796.97 56094 8/25/2005 005540 PC WORLD 08152005 2 yr. renewal-Ronnow 10-140-210-000-000 39.97 Total : 39.97 56095 8/25/2005 005584 PETTY CASH 08152005 Reimburse Petty Cash _ 1.0-110-270-000-000 25.00 10-140-268-000-000 22.28 10-140-270-000-000 17.00 10-180-218-000=000 21.55 10-180-220-000-000 2.95 10-180-245-000-000 6.13 10-180-246-000-000 13.98 10-190-210-000-000 9.69 10-190-211-000-000 91.84 10-190-226-000-000 15.00 10-440-246-000-000 23.21 10-808-246-000-000 9.40 23=200-12-00 7.49 Total : 265.52 56096 "8/25/2005 005586 PETTY CASH 08162005 Reimburse petty cash 10-440-220-000-000 11.93 10-440-221-000-000 7.28 10-440-223-000-000 66.04 10-440-228-000-000 36.42 Total : 121.67 56097 8/25/2005 010255 PONTEM SOFTWARE BY RIA 29067 Dog software-Annual Sept 05--06 Page: 9 vchlist —_ ---_ Voucher-L-ist -- - ------Page: -10 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account r Amount 56097 8/25/2005 010255 PONTEM,SOFTWARE BY RIA (Continued) a 10-190-256-000-000 325.00 Total : 325.00 56098 8/25/2005 010529 R.D.S. TOWING 7035 Move 2 containers to Sr. Ctr 21-573-713-000-000 542.50 Total : 542.50 56099 8/25/2005 010208 RATELLE, DAZE &ASSOCIATES July, 2005 CONSULTING 34-400-251-000-000 1,620.00 Total : 1,620.00 56100 8/25/2005 005673 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION_ 25457436-001 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES - 10-180-240-000-000 233.83 Total : 233.83 56101 8/25/2005 006242 RIVCOMM LLC 05-130338 TWO WAY RADIO FOR ANGEL'S TRUCK 10-180-710-000-000 721.79 Total : 721.79 56102 8/25/2005 006335 ROQUET PAVING INC_. 0704-05 Main w/o Taylor 16-900-260-000-000 10,022.00 0704-6 R& R asphalt-22246 Cardinal 16-900-260-000-000 2,480.00 0801-05 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 11-400-255-000-000 3,590.00 Total : 16,092.00 56103 8/25/2005 006453 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER 2005-06 2005-06 CAL-ID Contribution 10-410-258-000-000 9,187.50 Total : 9,187.50 56104 8/25/2005 006557 S.B. COUNTY DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS FC 020/06 NPDES FLOOD CONTROL SERVICE AGREEMENT 12-903-701-000-000 3,305.00 Total : 3,306.00 56105 8/25/2005 006565 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN S056726720A AD FOR PERSONNEL 10-120-230-000-000 145.34 Page: 10 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor J Invoice Description/Account Amount 56105 8/25/2005 006565 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN (Continued) Total : 146.34 56106 8/25/2005 006614 SCHWAB;THOMAS 08092005 Reimburse ICSC exp-May, 2005 - 10-120-270-000-000 108.00 Total : 108.00 56107 8/25/2005 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY July, 2005 July Natural Gas 10-805-238-000-000 16.12 10-440-238-000-000 35.29 10-190-238-000-000 35.59 Total : --87.00 56108 8/25/2005 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 5080411423 Office supplies 10-140-210-000-000 15.66 5922015001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-180-210-000-000 194.90 9154235061 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-180-210-000-000 147.13 9155041580 Office Supplies 10-180-210-000-000 23.35 Total : 381.04 56109 8/25/2005 010447 STUDIO 33 PRODUCTIONS 3938 Repair Chamber mic&recorder 10-180-245-000-000 180:00 Total : 180.00 56110 8/25/2005 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 5080305468 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 39.25 5080305476 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 544.24 Total : 583.49 56111 8/25/2005 010317 TEC OF CALIFORNIA INC 213955F STREET SWEEPER REPAIRS 16-900-254-000-000 59.83 Total : 59.83 56112 8/25/2005 606980 TEXACO/SHELL 8000209687508 July fuel 10-180-272-000-000 162.97 Page: 11 ____vchItst -- Voucher-L-ist —Page.--12 - 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice' Description/Account Amount 56112, 8/25/20105 006980 TEXACO%SHELL (Continued) Total : 162.97 56113 8/125/2005 007032 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES INC. 244820 Anchors 10-180-245-000-000 137.11 - Total : .137.11 56114 8/25/2005 007400 U. S.-BANK TRUST N.A. 09012005 INTEREST EARNINGS ADJ - - - - 33-600-01 13,271.60 33-300-208-001-000 1,470,000.00 33'-300-208-000-000 192,106.25 Total : 1,648,834.65 56115 8/25/2005 007400 U. S.-BANK TRUST N.A. 1541010 Admin Fees-7866940000 33-300-210-000-000 3,030.00 1541011 Admin Fees-#786694000 33-300-210-000-000 2,200.00 Total : 5,230.00 56116 8/25/2005 010421-- VILLAGE ENTERPRISES, DARCY MCNAB 05-46 July consulting services 10-180-255-000-000 300.00 Total : 300.00 -56117 8/25/2005 007645 VISIBLE 972629160 TRANSMITTAL FORMS FOR 1099'S 10-140-210-000-000 12.18 Total : 12.18 56118 8/25/2005 007795 WAXIE 69023898 03 SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 200.67 Total : 200.67 56119 8/25/2005 007880 WEST GROUP 809370538 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES 10-125-250-000-000 141.70 Total : 141.70 56120 , 8/25/2005 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 242093 PEST CONTROL Page: 12 vchlist i Voucher List Page: 13 08/16/2005 4:06:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56120 8/25/2005 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO (Continued) 10-180-245-000-000 80.00 10-440-245-000-000 68.50 10-805-245-000-000 30.50 34-400-246-000-000 35.50 Total : 214.50 56121 8/25/2005 007905 WHITLEY, BRIAN Aug. 2005 Aug. Planning Commission Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56122 8/25/2005 007925 WILSON, DOUG Aug. 2005 Aug. Planning Comm. Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56123 8/25/2005 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 011632240 COPIER CHARGES 10-190-246-000-000 530.01 011632240a June copier lease 10-190-246-000-000 530.01 Total : 1,060.02 -_ 56124 8/25/2005 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS July, 2005 BOTTLED WATER SERVICES 10-190-238-000-000 180.75 10-440-238-000-000 115.72 10-805-238-000-000 23.80 Total : 320.27 84 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 2,665;199.84 84 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 2,665,199.84 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 13 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 08/17/2005 2:53:33PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56125 8/25/2005 010293 AVAYA, INC. 0100319113 MAINTENANCE FOR PHONE SYSTEM &VOICE M, < 10-180-246-000-000 183.46 Total : 183.46 56126 8/25/2005 001656 CMRTA 08152005 Membership 10-140-265-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 56127 8/25/2005 001840 COLTON, CITY OF 08152005 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 21-570-802-000-000 97,896.78 08152005a WASTEWATER TREATMENT 21-570-802-000-000 97,896-'78 Total : 195,793.56 561,28 8/25/2005 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B848775 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10-125-230-000-000 133.66 Total : 133.66 56129 8/25/2005 002301 FEDEX 5-527-04567 July document delivery 10-370-210-000-000 16.65 Total : 16.65 56130 8/25/2005 005024 NEOPOST 11176255 NEW MAIL METER 10-190-701-000-000 3,003.86 42086871 MAIL MACHINE METER RENTAL 10-190-211-000-000 362.04 42087092 "MAIL MACHINE METER RENTAL 10-190-211-000-000 169.95 Total : 3,535.85 56131 8/25/2005 010533 RIVERSIDE CONCERT BAND 08092005 9/16/05 Park Concert 23-200-63-00 600.00 Total : 600.00 56132 8/25/2005 006341 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. July, 2005 TRACK TAX INCREMENT, PASS THRU, STMT OF 34-400-251-000-000 460.00 Page: 1 � i vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 08/17/2005 2:53:33PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56132 8/25/2005 006341 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. (Continued) Total :. 460.00 56133 8/25/2005 005529 SBC CALIFORNIA July, 2005 July DSL 10-380-235-000-000 185.83 Total : 185.83 56134 8/25/2006 006778 -STAPLES CREDIT PLAN - 9155241175 Office supplies 10-370-210-000-000 16.44 H306078002 File Folders 10-370-210-000-000 40.91 Total : 57.36 #######1 8/15/2005 007400 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. Aug. 2005 LEASE PAYMENTS 33-300-206-000-000 22,960.52 Total : 22,960.52 11 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 223,976.88 11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 223,976.88 15ertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expentidures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Page: 2 Cm hmo UT V CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ��r P"�-,v r'-� CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-AUGUST 11, 2005, A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California,on August 11, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. v PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6,Mayor Bea Cortes, Mayor Pro Tem Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Jim Miller, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager Larry Ronnow,Finance Director Jerry Glander,Building& Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director ABSENT: Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department John Harper, City Attorney The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Pastor Pat Bower, Calvary, The Brook Church followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Herman Hilkey. ITEMS TO DELETE -None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Proclamation - Southern California Association of Governments - 40 Years of Service Councilmember Garcia read the Proclamation commemorating SCAG's 40 years of service to the Southern California region 'and acknowledges that SCAG will continue to play a critical role in shaping Southern California's Future. 2B. Certificate -New Citizen Patrol Member Mary Danelle Bubier Mayor Ferr6 introduced the newest member of the Grand Terrace Citizen's Patrol, Mary Danelle Bubier, and presented a certificate of recognition for her completion of the Citizen Patrol Academy with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. COUNCIL AGENDA ITERA NO.] i I Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 2 ! CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2005-74 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the following Consent Calendar Items with the removal of items of 3A.and 3C.: j 3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3D. Resolution to Direct Collection of Delinquent Sewer User Fees on Tax Roll 2005-2006 3E. Travel Authorization- Council and City Manager ! ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR I 3A. Approve Check Register Dated August 11, 2005 I CC-2005-75 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Check Register Dated August 11, 2005 with the removal of Voucher# 55904 in the amount of$408,658.00. Voucher# 55904 in the amount of$408,658.00 CC-2005-76 MOTION BY MAYOR FERRE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 2-1-0-2 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY VOTED NO AND COUNCILMEMBERMILLERANDMAYORPRO TEM CORTES ABSTAINED), to accept voucher #55904 in the amount of $408,658.00 and to amend the commission of the Agent for the rental of the property to 6%. I 3C. Approval of 07-14-2005 and 07-26-2005 Minutes CC-2005-77 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the July 14, 2005 Minutes and the July 26, 2005 Minutes with an amendment to motion number CC-2005-73 as follows: I CC-2005-73 MOTION -BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, CARRIED 3-1-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER MILLER VOTED NO AND COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA WAS ABSENT),to enter into a new 10-year agreement with Honeywell for HVAC equipment and a full maintenance contract on all city-owned HVAC units. I PUBLIC COMMENT i r Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 3 Bill Hays,22114 De Berry, stated that at the last Council Meeting he questioned if more tax allocation bonds were going to be brought forth in reference to the 13 million that the Redevelopment Agency issued last November, and weren't informed about for several months,and Mr.Schwab responded that he didn't know about any tax allocation bonds even though he had addressed He and Mr. Karger twice with regards to them. He has copies of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace Notes of Financial Statements of August 2004 that the Agency issued 13 million of refunding Tax Allocation Bonds Service 2004. The Bonds were issued to refinance various bond services. He also asked where the shortfall in the budget was going to be made up. He referred to an article that was in the Press Enterprise on Friday, May 13, 2005 that stated that the Revenues werel7.5 million and the expenditures were 21.5 million with a deficit taken from reserve fund balance. He presented the information to the Council. He stated that citizen's have not been able to see or hear anything about the Outdoor Adventures Center. He stated that on October 22, 2004 a law suit was file against the City. He questioned why the residents are not being informed about the OAC. He referred to an article in the Press Enterprise on Wednesday, September 22, 2004 that it is quoted we don't want a Walmart or large trucks in our City, so he is confident that we can count on the vote for a town center because it is going to be a big box store. City Manager Schwab,stated that Mr.Hays' question at the last meeting was,were there any additional bonds sold beyond the 13 million dollar bonds that were sold for the refinancing and the answer was no. He stated that anyone who knows how to read a budget knows that you look at not just the current revenue coming in but the fund balance and capital balances that you draw on to do projects. If you look at the project before us tonight it is going to be a 9 million dollar project that is going to come from the Redevelopment Agency. That money has been saved over the years in order to do the project so in the year that the project is done it'is going to show that the revenues are much lower. So when you read a budget you can't just take the revenues and subtract the expenditures and say there is a deficit. You have to take the revenue plus all available fund balances and capital funds to equal available cash which then is used to service any expenditures against the budget. So in the City's case there is revenue and fund balance,that is the available cash,that is sufficient to pay for all of the expenses that is budget in this years budget so therefor it is a balanced budget. ORAL REPORTS 5A. Committee Reports 1. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of 06-06-2005 CC-2005-78 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the June 6, 2005 Minutes of the Historical and i I i i Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 4 i Cultural Activities Committee. I 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of 07-05-2005 i CC-2005-79 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the July 5, 2005 Minutes of the Emergency Operations Committee. COUNCIL REPORTS i Councilmember Garcia, reported that the opening ceremonies for Soccer will be held on Saturday. She reported that the Chamber will hold their Annual Golf Tournament on August 26`b and encouraged anyone interested to participate. She stated that at the League of California Cities Board Meeting telecommunications was a big issue. She stated that there is a merger of Verizon and MCI and that there is going to be a public hearing at the San Bernardino Public Library on Thursday, August 18, 2005 at 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. She reported that the Omnilink service was taken away and in return Grand Terrace gets access for the entire City. Information will be provided in the Blue Mountain Outlook. She encouraged those who need the service to take advantage of it. Councilmember Miller, stated that anyone interested in participating in the Chamber of Commerce Golf Tournament should call the Chamber at 909 783 -3581 or the Chairperson, Margie Miller at 909 534-2500. I Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, reported that at the SANBAG Board of Directors Meeting, Norm King,Executive Director,formally gave notice of his retirement. They are in the process of looking for a firm that will help in finding a new Executive Director. She also reported that Gary Moon has lung and brain cancer and is not doing well. She wished City Manager Schwab a happy birthday. Mayor Ferr6,reported that she received a call from Anita Edstrum who announced that the Grand Terrace Girls Junior Softball team went to the Western Regionals in Tousan and were undefeated. They are now on their way to Kirkland,Washington to play in the Little League Series for girls Junior Softball and wished them the very best. She would like to do something in the Blue Mountain Outlook on the team. Assistant City Manager Berry, stated that he is already working on it. PUBLIC HEARING 6A. GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-15, E-05-16 - a proposal to Develop 120 Units of Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 5 Multi-family Senior Housing, a 6,500 Community Senior Center, and a Four Acre Passive Park An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Approving SP-05-01 (Blue Mountain Senior Villas Specific Plan)and Environmental Assessment E-05-16 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, Approving General Plan Amendment Case No GP-05-01 for an Amendment to the City General Plan - Community Development Element to Add a New Land Use Designation of Medium High Density Residential Gary Koontz Community and Economic Development Director,indicated that on August 4, 2005, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing for a proposed 120 unit multi- family senior housing proj ect with a 6,500 square foot community senior center and four acre passive park. The project is located at the site of the existing community senior center along the south side of Grand Terrace Road approximately 200 feet east of Mt. Vernon Avenue. He gave an overview of the project. Mary Silverstein Developer with Corporation for Better Housing, gave a presentation that presented the projects that they have completed and then gave information on the project at hand and then closed with the profile of the future residents. Camilo Arellano,Landscape Architect,gave a presentation on the conceptual landscape plan for the project. Mary Silverstein,stated that this proj ect is truly designed for the entire community. She gave statistics on who resides in facilities like the,proposed prof ect. She shared an artist rendering of the proposed facility. Ci1y Manager Schwab,reported that at the Planning Commission meeting he explained why the Redevelopment Agency is involved in the project. He gave an overview of the source of the funding for the proposed project. The Agency is proposing to fund approximately half of the project. The project is budgeted to be approximately 18 million dollars and therefor the Agency is going to budget to subsidize approximately 9 million dollars with Redevelopment funds. Redevelopment money is property tax money that is paid for by the residents into the Redevelopment Agency Fund. One of the laws under redevelopment is that 20%of all taxes that are collected in the Redevelopment Agency must be used for affordable housing. The City of Grand Terrace in our tenure as a Redevelopment Agency has concentrated on primarily two things,low and no interest loans for home improvements and the single family purchase rehabilitation program. The Agency has done no senior housing to date. He stated that the revenues according to the Redevelopment Agency Law must be obligated withing 5 years of the date of receipt or they are subject to be lost to the County of I i Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 6 San Bernardino. We have not lost any of our funding to date. He has toured many sites that are owned and operated by Corporation for Better Housing. He stated the funding source comes from Redevelopment Tax Increment,the Agency needs to use the money for housing and he is proposing that the Agency uses it for this particular senior housing project. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz, went over some design and engineering issues. He indicated that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment E-05-01, approve an Ordinance to amend the City General plan as requested under GP-05-01,and adopt an Ordinance approving the Blue Mountain Villas Specific Plan under SP-05-01. i Councilmember Garcia, stated that she really likes landscaping and wanted clarification on ! what the swells are. fl Camilo Arrellano,responded that there are a series of swells on site that are gentle mounds with a dip and the dip is covered with grass. This allows any of the water that comes from the parking lot to go through the park deep filtered and at the end it will be cleaner water that will eventually go to the storm water system. Councilmember Garcia, questioned what the landscaping buffer will be for those residents that are on Brentwood. Camilo Arrellano, responded that they have designed for medium height trees to provide shade and constant screen. Nothing too tall to impede the view. The maximum height of the trees would be 24 to 25 feet high. I Councilmember Garcia, questioned what type of fencing will be installed. Camilo Arrellano, responded that they are proposing that a fence be right next to the adjoining properties. At this time it is proposed to be wrought iron or tubular steel with decorative columns. Councilmember Garcia, questioned how tall the fences will be. Camilo Arrellano,responded that they will be about 6 feet tall. i Councilmember Garcia, wants to make sure that it will be aesthetically pleasing. Councilmember Hilkey, questioned where the air conditioner compressors will be located. Mary Silverstein, responded that there is one per unit and they are built into the walls. I I Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 7 'Ben Lingo,Development Team,stated that the actual unit is flush with the exterior wall and painted the same color as the stucco. There is not a condenser on the ground and it won't be transmitting noise to the outside. Each unit has its own that is self contained within its own unit. ' Councilmember Hilkev,wanted clarification on what the developers consider a.m.traffic and p.m. traffic. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz, stated that staff had the traffic engineer look at the project and referred to the letter provided to the Council. He stated that the traffic engineer stated that the project will not have any significant traffic circulation,or off-site parking impacts. Part of the conditions of approval are that they will have to do full improvements on the north side of Grand Terrace Road and to tie in with the improvements on Mt. Vernon. Councilmember Hilkev, expressed his concern with the morning high traffic time. Confirmed that there will be full improvements on the North side of Grand Terrace Road to Mt. Vernon and questioned what the status is for the south side. Community and Economic Development Director,responded that the south side was done about a year or so ago and this project will finish out the north side. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned if there are any plans for shared parking with the elementary school. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz,stated that the visitor parking lot is an open area that can be used for the park. People can park in the parking and walk to the school. Mary Silverstein,stated that the Villas will be gated and there is no opportunity for overflow parking into the residential parking at all. The open parking is available to the public. She stated that it is her experience with other projects that maybe 50%of the residents have cars. She stated that she spoke to the property manager at one of their facilities and he stated that 40%of their parking lot is empty almost every day and of the cars that are there 50%of them have a thick layer.of dust. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned if there is an exercise pool. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz, responded that they are not proposing a pool. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned why they are placing trees in front of the large viewing I� Council Minutes j August 11, 2005 Page 8 window. Camilo Arellano, stated that the model isn't portraying what is going to happen. There is going to be citrus trees which will be dwarf varieties so they will easily be able to see over them. Councilmember Hilkey, questioned if there will be any trees in front of the glass area. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz, stated that there will be some citrus trees designated in the area. Mga Silverstein, stated that the drawings are meant to be decorative,the actual trees will be the ones that are in the landscaping plan. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned if there is an elevator. Mary Silverstein, responded that there are two elevators. i Councilmember Hilkev, feels that businesses don't do well next to senior centers. He feels that this is a good location for the project and that it makes sense to have it in that location. Councilmember Miller,stated that he knows that there are a lot of people in the audience that live on Brentwood and he also knows that people purchase homes when they have a view. After walking the site, he has an.idea of which of the homes on Brentwood will no longer have a view because of the project. He knows that the value of the properties will drop without having the view. He stated that Council hasn't seen any other renderings of possibilities for the layout of the property. He expressed his concerns for those people who will have their view blocked and the value of their property and he would like to hear what they have to say. He noticed that there are only two trash enclosures and questioned how they will get their trash to the enclosures. John Cotton, Architect,responded that there are trash chutes on each floor at the end of the corridors. I Councilmember Miller,he stated that he didn't see anything designated for trash in the park. Camilo Arellano,stated that the park will have trash receptacles located throughout the park, the locations of those has not been determined yet. Councilmember Miller, stated that he didn't see any water fountains in the park. i Marx Silverstein,responded that there will not be any water fountains in the park the senior Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 9 center has grown an extra 1500 square feet. There were many discussions with the,staff and with the seniors about what was more important. Given the limited sources and limited space,the most important thing was a facility that was most useful to the entire community. Councilmember Miller, when the City was looking at building Petta Park it was for Grand Terrace and the entire community. Everyone on the outside coming in has to come in only where the driveways are. MM Silverstein,responded in the affirmative. She stated that the City requested that they limit any type of vandalism. Councilmember Miller,people are going to drive to the park and walk in the park and then leave in their cars. Mary Silverstein, stated that this park was designed as a passive park. Commuity and Economic Development Director Koontz, stated that it is designed as a landscaped area. Councilmember Miller,stated that it makes sense to him to have water fountains in the park. Mary Silverstein,stated that drinking fountains can be installed,she thought Councilmember Miller was referring to decorative fountains. Councilmember Miller, confirmed that there will be drinking fountains in the park. Mga Silverstein,responded that there will be drinking fountains in the park. Councilmember Miller,clarified that the wrought iron fence will be around the park and also on the south part of the property line. Mary Silverstein, responded in the affirmative and that they are currently discussing with Edison placing it directly against the property line. Councilmember Miller, questioned if there will be a gate at the first entrance. Mary Silverstein, responded that the gate will be at the main entry. Councilmember Miller, questioned if there will be a gate as you go in and out onto Grand Terrace Road. Camilo Arellano, stated that the public parking area will not be gated. i I it Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 10 Councilmember Miller, questioned if there will be any security provided by the Company. Mary Silverstein,responded that they have a manager and manager's assistant that will live on site. They typically with their projects have some form of patrol. Councilmember Miller, questioned the height of roof line from grade on the south side. Ben Lingo, responded that the height of the roof from the grade on the south side from the finished floor after the grade will be 34 feet. Where the grade is today versus where it will j be when the building is built will be taken down about 10 feet. I Mayor Pro Tern Cortes, questioned if the site will provide some form of transportation. I { Ben Lingo,responded that it is in the conditions of approval that theyprovide shuttle service. I Mayor Pro Tern Cortes, questioned if there are 100 units this will allow for a site manager. Ben Lingo,responded that it will allow them to have two managers on site instead of one. Mayor Pro Tern Cortes, questioned what the impact will be on property value. Ben Lingo,responded that in his research,there are some studies that show that there is not a negative impact. What needs to be looked at is the precise project and development that is being proposed. This development includes a four acre open area a building that is planned to be built to the highest standards, the best materials. It is their intention to have a plan that has,the least amount of impact. It is their intention to build a project that will compliment the neighborhood and have a positive impact on the area. Mavor Ferre, wanted clarification that Grand Terrace Road will be improved from Mt. Vernon to Vista Grande Way. Community Development Director Koontz,responded that when the street widening project was done a small section of Grand Terrace Road was improved. From those improvements to the intersection of Vista Grande Way and Grand Terrace Road will be improved. Mayor Ferre opened discussion to the public. JoAnn Johnson, 12723 Mt.Vernon,stated that she is totally in favor of the Senior Villas and feels that this is something that is needed in Grand Terrace. She feels that the Blue Mountain Villas, the Senior Center and the Susan Petta Passive park will be a welcome haven for innumerable people in the years to come. i Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Drive,stated that he has had a number of conversations with seniors Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 11 throughout the community and they are excited about the project. He feels that the site is a perfect location for this project. It is his opinion that the present Planning Staff,Planning Commission, and City Council is the best that the City has ever had. Virginia Harford, 11825 Arliss Way,stated that she is totally for this project for the seniors. She feels that the proposed Senior Complex is a beautiful idea. She is sorry for those who will loose their view but believes that in the long run they will agree that it is the best use of that property. The only thing that she is sorry about is that they are not building a swimming pool and jacuzzi. Lois Hansen, 22789 - C Palm Avenue, stated that the best decision she ever made was moving to Grand Terrace. After retiring from teaching she became involved with the Senior Center. She has been involved in the discussions for the plans of the new Senior Center,the Villas,and the Park. She feels that their input was solicited and taken respectfully. She feels that the project would not have an impact on the traffic. She strongly supports the project. Mary Ann Stewart,11677 Mt.Vernon Avenue,stated that she totally agrees with this proj ect. She stated that no one ever promised that they would have a view forever. She can't wait for this project to get started. Mamie Burkett,22111 Newport Space 161,stated that she fully approves of the project. She intends to be the first person to move in. She feels that this is such a blessing for those that are low income that wish to stay in Grand Terrace for the rest of their years. The convenience of the proposed park and the proximately to the new senior center is another special thing. Bill Timmons, 11687 Queensborough Street, Riverside, feels that this project will have a significant economic impact on the City. If this project is not approved the City will miss out tremendously. Robert Stewart, 11677 Mt. Vernon, stated that he is all for the development of this project. He feels that there is no guarantee that you will have a view forever. Martha Paxton,22673 A.Palm Avenue,stated that she has been a resident of Grand Terrace fo 29 years. Throughout the years she has appreciated the work of the City Council. She feels that it is thoughtful that the City Council is thinking of the seniors and their needs. She feels that the new complex will do several things. It will provide affordable housing, fellowship-of others, access to hot meals without driving, lots of social activities. She has enjoyed the activities at the present center,but the time has come for enlargement,updating and additional activities. She is for the Blue Mountain Senior Villa and Senior Center. Dan Berliner, 22624 Brentwood Street, stated that he has lived in his home for nineteen years. Approximately two years ago he was approached by the City regarding the passive Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 12 park and at that time was assured that their view would not be affected. Recently they found out about this project. He stated that Ms. Silverstein spoke to many seniors with regards to the project,however,she did not speak to the potential neighbors. He expressed his concern with the air conditioners that they have proposed. He expressed his concern with the project and the affect it will have on his property. Jeffrey McConnell,21758 Walnut,feels that senior housing is needed in Grand Terrace for Grand Terrace residents. Posed some questions with parking and the availability of overflow parking. He feels that you should never purchase a property next to a vacant lot unless you know that it is going to be vacant forever. He encouraged everyone to provide their input. i Cecil&Cathy Kidd,22636 Brentwood,feels that the developer can do more to enhance the properties with landscaping. The complex doesn't impact anyone other than those who live on Brentwood. He feels that there is more that they can do to the South East corner of this i proj ect. Thelma Winkler Beach, 12570 Mt. Vernon Avenue, feels that the presentation was impressive, however, wanted to know who is behind the change to the General Plan. She j feels that they should stick to the General Plan and keep the senior housing on Barton Road. Bill Hays, 22114 De Berry Street, feels that they should look at the project closely and that they have not allowed due process of an appeal of the Planning Commission decision per the zoning code of Grand Terrace. He questioned how low income is determined. He feels that this item should be removed from the agenda because of the zoning code. Jim Seley, 22325 Barton Road, stated that he supports this project. In the greater good of humanity, he feels that the City needs to take care of the seniors. He feels that the seniors spend money in the City as well as their families. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, questioned what the qualifications are for a low j income senior. He feels that most people will not qualify for low income. He stated that the Commission turned down an apartment project on DeBerry as well as his project because it is an apartment complex. He is opposed to the project. Barneyy Karger,read a letter on behalf of Kim Hathaway who is opposed to the project in the proposed location and feels that it would be better to be located on Barton Road. Pastor Patrick Bower, on behalf of Calvary, The Brook, stated that they are in favor of the proj ect. Anita McGaughey, 22415 Barton Road, feels that the Council needs to look at this project carefully and suggested that they look at some competitive bidders. She doesn't feel that they should re-zone the property and that the City should stay on title. She feels that the Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 13 Council should listen to all of the questions posed. Anne Wade-Hornsby,22656 Brentwood,stated that she is concerned and feels that the City needs to be careful about making zoning changes and that they really need to look at who is going to profit from this project. She loves Grand Terrace and feels that Council needs to be careful about the changes that they,make. She feels that they have got to be concerned about property density and the rent that is charged for low income but most of all who is going to profit and is it worth it. Patricia Farley, 12513 Michigan Street,stated that she doesn't have a problem with providing good, appropriate housing for seniors. She feels that children and seniors can benefit a lot by doing things together. However, she doesn't feel that this is an appropriate place and it would be better located on Barton Road. She feels that the City is catering to developers and not following through the guidelines and laws. She feels that the residents have the right to expect that the City would protect their privacy and not to damage their property and to follow the laws. The General Plan needs to be followed. She feels that everyone is not being considered in the surveys. She has a large problem with a non-profit developer that's damaging the property and yet finds money to donate to Grand Terrace Days and then gets a deal from the City and feels that it is wrong. Evan Dahlke, 22586 Brentwood Street, stated that this is a perfect project for his mother, however,he would like to see the Council take their time on a project of this type. He feels that there can be compromises that will make everyone happy. He feels that this is a major decision and encouraged the Council to really look at this project before voting on it. Chuck Hornsby,22656 Brentwood Street,expressed his dissatisfaction with the three minute rule. He feels that the Council should throw out the three minute rule for this project. He questioned if the City is going to be liable for damages that take place to surrounding homes because of construction. If the park is surrounded by a fence it is going to be perceived as a senior park not a City park. He is concerned with the re-zoning of the area. Mike Grabendike, stated that there have been a number of questions that have been raised tonight. Based on his experience senior housing projects are great for the community. Gladys Hernandez, 1171 Oakwood Drive J 301, feels that this project is an asset to the community and supports it. Mayor Ferr6, returned discussion to the Council. Councilmember Hilkey,stated that the Council knows what non-profit is. To him non-profit simply means that you can't invest it but you can distribute salaries. It increases the salaries for that work for the non-profit organizations. He requested clarification of the ownership of this development. II, i Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 14 City Manager Schwab, responded that currently the City owns the parcels of land and the current proposal is that we will continue to own the land. We will lease the land to the non- profit and under the current arrangement at the end of the 65 years of operations that entire facility will belong to the City. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that the Mayor started the three minute rule and that it is up to her not the rest of the Council. He expressed his concern with the 10 days past the Planning Commission Meeting and questioned if that is a block. City Manager Schwab, responded that there is no legal requirement. Community and Economic Development Director Koontz,stated that the Council is hearing the project now. The two items that are before the Council require Council approval. This is a recommendation from the Planning Commission. i Councilmember Hilkev,stated that the safety of Seniors is a number one concern and he feels that the Seniors will be safer on Grand Terrace Road than in a shopping center on Barton Road.ti He is truly disappointed that this project does not have a swimming pool. He feels that exercise for seniors is important. He really feels that there needs to be an exercise pool j at this facility. He feels like there could be different landscaping behind the building and different landscaping behind Petta Park. He feels that Mr. Miller's comments on the trash were good and feels that the trash issue needs to be more functional and needs to be changed. He counted 35 air conditioning units on the south side of the complex and suspects that they are heat pumps. I Ben Lingo, responded that there is a heat pump as part of the unit. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that if there are 35 heat pumps running in January or 35 air conditioning condensers running in the summertime that is a lot of noise going on Brentwood. He would like that to be changed somehow so that they are not all facing north. Ben Lingo,this is something that was considered in the design. The building is in excess 60 i feet away from its nearest neighbor and the property line. The trees are proposed for not only a visual relief but also a noise buffer. It was designed this way intentionally. I Councilmember Garcia,requested clarification on the qualification of low income. ,I City Manager Schwab, stated that it varies by County but for San Bernardino County, someone who would qualify for 50% of the medium income, which is$20,320.00 per year or$1,693.00 per month would have a rent of$508.00 per month for a one bedroom$573.00 per month for a two bedroom. If they have 60%of the average medium income, they could make up to $24,400.00 maximum annual income or a monthly income of just over $2,000.00,which would give them a rent of$610.00. The issue of owning of assets, if you Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 15 have a home and bank accounts, CD's, etc. if you have$100,000.00 in cash in the bank the formula that is allowed by the County is that you must count that as,passive income based on a 2%return. So if you had$100,000.00 in the bank you would have to add$2,000.00 per year to your income. He specifically asked that a component built into this project to allow for some market rate units so that regardless of how much money you make you could still live there. There are a lot of seniors that have planned for their future in Grand Terrace. He stated that most seniors by definition are low income. He is talking about$20,000.00 for the lowest rents and$24,000.00. This particular project does not have the low-low component. The lowest is 50%. Councilmember Garcia, stated that things change and when Wayne Webster passed away it posed an opportunity for the City to get a piece of property that was very critical to our community and that is what changed the direction of the City at looking at this site. She stated that there was a gerontologist that worked with the City to explain what the seniors of tomorrow were going to need and what their desires would be which helped her in the process. She questioned what the City's policy is if we do construction and it damages another property. 1 City Manager Schwab,responded that if it was a City prof ect and we did the construction and it could be proved that by direct correlation something we did damaged anybody in proximity,we could be liable. In this case the project is going to be built by the contractor that they hire,in which case that person is going to be required to have liability insurance so if they do anything that injurs the neighborhood then they will be liable for it. Ultimately is it on our property and we would probably be the secondary deep pocket in the case of any type of action that was brought against the contractor. Councilmember Garcia, stated that it is her intent, as a representative of the people and a member of City Council,to look at what would be in the best interest of the community. She sees in this process from the seniors perspective it is a win,win,win. She very much thinks that the City should have spoken to the Brentwood property owners earlier and getting their input. She is sure that the project will not be able to meet all of the mitigation but feels that they brought up some good ideas and would like to know if there would be any harm in postponing this for a meeting or two to have the opportunity to get some input from the residents on Brentwood. She feels that it would be a benefit to hear their concerns. City,Manager Schwab,responded that there is no sense of urgency and if the Council wishes to take another month it will just put the opening schedule back. He would only ask what forum they would like to choose in order to resolve the issues. Councilmember Garcia,stated that the forum that was used for the Omnilink service was not a formal public hearing and everyone that came in had an opportunity to talk. She would encourage the Brentwood residents to come together and come to a certain level of agreement. Staff can then have a meeting with the developers and could talk about the I I I I Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 16 options, although they need to recognize the fact that we may not be able to meet all of the needs but will try to meet as many as possible within the projects. She stated that she has some questions regarding the lighting at the park and safety issues. Mary Silverstein, stated that if the item is pushed back the delay for the start of construction will be pushed back two to three months. The intention of the design of the park is that it will be well lit and it is their responsibility to maintain that. Councilmember Garcia, questioned if the park will be closed after dusk. i Mga Silverstein, responded in the affirmative. It is designed to be opened from dawn to j dusk. ,I Councilmember Garcia, wants to make sure that everything has been thought out as far as the maintenance of the park so that once there is a beautiful park it stays that way. Mary Silverstein,stated that the landscape architects that were hired are experts in their field and it will be very well irrigated and maintained. Councilmember Garcia, stated that if extra events will take place at the park overflow parking will be necessary, and questioned what the plan is. i Mary Silverstein, feels that this is something that they can be creative with. Currently there is a gate that extends at the opening of the residential portion it may be possible to pull the gate in a little bit. Councilmember Garcia, clarified that the residents on Brentwood will see a two story building with windows. I Mary Silverstein, responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Garcia, questioned how flexible the developer would be on a redesign. Mary Silverstein,stated that the design was very carefully thought out. This is a combination of the sources that are available, and an effort to keep the entire development as close to the school as possible creating the 4 acre park. Councilmember Garcia,stated that she is very happy with the senior center and the park,she just wants to mitigate as much as possible. i Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, stated that she also supports what Councilwoman Garcia has said and has some of the same concerns and would like to wait and give it some time. She does support the senior housing and the park. She questioned if the Webster house could have Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 17 been utilized prior to it being torn down. She stated that she appreciates Mr. Dahlke's comments. Councilmember Miller, stated that he doesn't feel that anyone is against the senior center or the fact that we do need housing for seniors. He feels that we need to look at the fact that there are a lot of ideas that we may not have looked at and that there might be a better time to look-at these ideas instead of making a decision tonight. He stated that he has only looked at one of the iterations and would like the opportunity to see others in a effort to come up with a solution to those on Brentwood. He questioned if there are any units that will be set aside for the handicap. Mary Silverstein, responded that all 120 units are handicap adaptable. Councilmember Miller, stated that he would agree that this should be postponed. Mayor Ferre, stated that she also made a list of item, all of which has been covered with the exception of the South East corner of the project. She questioned the Council that if they postpone this item, what is it that they expect to see happen. Councilmember Garcia,responded that she would like to see the development team have an informational meeting with the Brentwood residents and anyone else that is interested, after they have had a chance to look at the information that the Council has,then have a meeting similar to one held on Omnilink, where it is more informal.and we get input and within a month come back and formally hear the project. Councilmember Hilkey, questioned if we want to talk about limiting those things that will be addressed. Mayor Ferre,.feels that the discussion needs to be somewhat limited. Councilmember Hilkey,is hearing the landscaping,the fence,trash cans,and the type of trees in the park and on the south corner and the air conditioning noise, however, none of those address lowering the building. He feels that we need to give direction on what the limitations of change are. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, questioned that if we look at changing it from three stories to two will one month be enough time. i Councilmember Miller, stated that they stated that they have multiple iterations and questioned if they still had them. Ben Lingo, responded in the affirmative. He stated that they appreciate the public process and the input. They can look at going to two stories. The reason that they came up with this r I j Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 18 design is many folds. He feels that they have taken the effort to try and mitigate the impact for the neighbors. He stated that one of the reasons that they came up with the 120 units was for the optimum financial model. 120 units allows them to obtain a certain amount of bond financing,a certain amount of tax credit that allows them to leverage the City's funds,which allows for the senior center and the park. If this is scaled back it is possible that the senior center and park will be scaled back as well. They are willing to look at what the City wants and they want to be a part of this community. This is a 65 year commitment and they want to make it work. Councilmember Miller, stated that it is a matter of having the opportunity to look at r everything. ' City Manager Schwab, stated that if you want to limit having every single issue brought up including should we even build one of these projects,perhaps it would better to identify the six or seven that need to be placed back on the agenda. Mayor Ferr6, agrees that we should look at the issues that have been brought up. City Manager Schwab, indicated that he wasn't aware of the time line on the tax credit issues. He stated that this item has to come back for a second reading and it doesn't matter whether it comes back in two weeks or in September for the second reading. Council can adopt the first reading,if they choose and direct staff to go back between now and September 8, 2005 and address those issues that are on table for the developer and staff to go to any interested residents and deal with those issues. On the 8`h when it comes back to Council if { it is satisfactory to the Council or if they would like to make modifications they are under no obligation to adopt the second reading,they can continue it again if they choose. This would allow us to have a starting point, so that staff is not starting from ground zero. I Councilmember Hilkey, questioned if any of the iterations were two stories. Ben Lingo, responded that there were some iterations that were two story, the issue was trying to get enough units for the economies that it helps the project it basically leaves no land for the park. It is roughly a 90 thousand square foot building, 30 thousand per floor,if you take that and make it two story's it would then go to 45 thousand square feet per floor. The open space would diminish substantially. Councilmember Hilkey, expressed his appreciation for his explanation. He stated that he would like to see the discussion limited to the items that have been brought up. Councilmember Garcia, stated that she would like to see the landscaping, fence, trash and air conditioning to be addressed. Mayor Pro Tem Cortes, she stated that she thought one of the issues was to consider a two story building. Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 19 City Manager Schwab,stated the staff has been working on this project for about a year and a half. He stated that the architect tried to place the building as far east as possible in an effort to affect the least amount of views and also preserve some park space. It could be spread out and make it two story or even one,but you will loose a lot of elements that they feel is important for the seniors and probably for the neighbors. The way the project is presented makes the most sense for a balanced project. Councilmember Miller, stated that he would like to see all of the iterations. Ben Lino, questioned to what level of detail does the Council want with regards to the iterations. Councilmember Hilkey, stated that the south wing at two stories would be the only option that would make sense. City Manager Schwab,stated that he feels that he can come up with enough versions of what staff has gone through to give the Council a good feeling for what has been looked at and, what the implications of those options are. He feels that he heard the direction of the Council and will come back with at least three scenarios that address the second story and bring it back to Council. He is asking the Council to continue this item to September 8, 2005 and then staff will meet with both the residents and with the Council in some sequence where they can take a look at the options. CC-2005-80 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, CARRIED 5-0, to continue GPA-05-01, SP-05-01, SA-05-14,E-05-16- a Proposal to Develop 120 Units of Multi-Family Senior Housing, a 6,500 Community Senior, and a Four Acre Passive Park to Council Meeting to be held on September 8,2005 and direct staff to schedule a informational meeting to discuss and to address the following items: Two Stories on the South end of the Housing Fencing issues along the South Side of the Property Landscaping along the South Side of the Property Condenser Noise Trash Can's Lighting at the Park 6B. Street Cut Policy and an Ordinance the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Establishing Fines for Failure to Obtain a Street Cut Permit and Failure to Perform Street Cut Construction in Accordance to the Specifications as Described in the Specifications for Construction within the Public Right of Way. CC-2005-81 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM i Council Minutes August 11,2005 Page 20 CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to continue the Public Hearing for Street Cut Policy and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Establishing Fines for Failure to Obtain a Street Cut Permit and Failure to Perform Street Cut Construction in Accordance to the Specifications as Described in the Specifications for Construction within the Public Right of Way until September 22, 2005. I UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None NEW BUSINESS 8A. Measure I Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2005-2010 ' CC-2005-82 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, CARRIED 5-0,to adopt the Measure"P'Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2005-2010 and the Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for 2005. 8B. Redlining 350 Ft. of Curbing for a School Bus Stop and Adjacent Corner at 22111 Newport CC-2005-83 MOTIONBY COUNCILMEMBERHILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,CARRIED 5-0,to approve staff s recommendation to paint red zones with a total combined length of 350 feet in front of 22111 Newport Avenue. I 8C. Designation of Voting Delegates for 2005 League of California Cities Annual Conference CC-2005-84 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,CARRIED 5-0,to appoint Mayor Maryetta Ferr6 as the voting delegate and Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia as the alternate voting delegate for the League of California Cities Annual Conference Business Session scheduled to be held on October 8, 2005. CLOSED SESSION -None I { Mayor Ferr6 adjourned the meeting at 10:03 p.m. until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace i MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace - -=c2 -`>�'�'gr• -r;�^�.s�,�-+. .z:t .� '?�i - - t''`,`'"-.z;-=;`<._<�':i�.. ,f�� _�.ro-'�q-; "sue �:_,.,,- .� :� _ a^,-��W=..ems„ -E-.rf?- .,,-.,��..�, = a.'c'�'�:Y ,t,'i`a��'�%�'14• F>'s _%rtzx^�n:: r"��`z-`eP+>-'.�e _.:.r:a.eo- .�. -:�.;.z'.as.:�':�:.�. �..;$.�.-. ='?•�;-'Z.`i k--if:�-.n�, =�='ra-.a+-S.:-�;,— _ -E'3^',^'efi'�n'.•' Y'f't,'��`v __�s.'.s-'— x:�t'�r.r�r';,��.,�. �:�. �y. ..�.h ,�:,--_ _ '-d.,-". � ,._#�%,'.:-,}�9-r..:=_ 'Et ,-;;{,---., -.,�"?:'�:� ..:-�£.:.:.;,•:'--'a-=� _�+,.ts.,,"C.�^..:--.�.�-. - �-,."""�t:::.F'rh.Y=3�'�_,:�,,.r:ss=.`'�=- ;t':,�Z p;et-- y:°+=:�. ��..�`- CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: AUGUST 25, 2005 FUNDING REQUIRED FUNDING NOT REQUIRED X SUBJECT: Appeal of SA-05706/E-05-04 applications for a Site and Architectural, and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office and the conversion of an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and, approximately 10,000 square feet of production. RECOMONDATION: Open the Public Hearing, consider the appeal and take an action. Background: This project was heard by the Planning Commission on May 19, 2005 and continued to the June 16, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. The project was heard again by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2005, and was approved with a 2-1-2-0 vote, Commissioner Whitley and Chair Wilson being absent. An appeal was filed on June 27, 2005 by Frank O. Tetley. The attached Planning Commission staff report presents information regarding the proj ect's location and design as well as the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Planning Commission. The approved minutes from both the May 19th and June 16th Planning Commission meeting are also attached. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council open the Public Hearing, receive testimonies and take an action on the appeal. The possible actions that could be taken are as follows; 1. Approve the appeal which would deny the project. 2. Deny the appeal which would approve the project as is, or. 3. Deny the appeal but approve the project with existing, new and additional conditions. I ' I I I • °`r"'.4'„�"tea„ .<;:�' -;'s�'y..` +�i':�"�4:�=��>,'-c;.., •;.;3s :�v'r' '�7�. '�1�,^a-:�.�..�_- e..,�. _ -ts"a t +�.ss�.�;.;.`'.:n,,`•'... I `:'*3<�"�-e.n .>�:��l�J£� =�,�ry`�� --r�..z S-:.'T i.:�•:�X� �i;�,F��'�k tar"~f: `:`74ai<"i':•n'-'..-'&,.� -'•-.i'.P..-;.�-: y- "^�y-,.,X ��>_ 3� "..e1:` "'ive- = r''f'"-••_-_ -".::�k. .....,:'z; y.}C�1i:t'i �':€W:Sri'..%. ..;y�`{•�Yb."i• :3--�'� ��-t'"t�__a,-�'>>�'^.'`.� I �_z,..y'�'�-�faF �� °"`e`.`e _ =`.5��:�,?'k'-u,=^^-^i!•...+Y.� :4-a-�y: - '" <� �.T. y. _ .�s��r.£o/3� - :_:x �p�-y - _ -�'{`Jv. - Ja'4b',"WK:,= .s�?Y±'�..�=�`-.s��>'anv A�in'�1=- -^fvfi i•Y`.� ac•=f.. - 'a ,: -s _�� -R�" ^# .'-�"n ''+.�it?•s.+ =- 3+' --x - -.5."%T�. ...h.xS�;.aas`'-r `�•+'°•'Y=.Af' _ :-�`es.v�__��,:_ z.n "Tad`c`-L�i�'S,... r5.-_:G-ss5 a`•5�.f.�- �.>.!:7_ `-.`r+,t-. - ".,dfz"' - '�-r. - �zv•.`:-.zi'y:•L'�`=,�L`:cAF.. .i:" .a�.C :^"" �.:a:�. - _�:^t;'- —i:.g-.=t•!�a_ .y�'r„ .�``-;>y.-+.v:» - -'.a-�._�=r'✓:i"s,�,. -- ...�;•:r...� - - 3i'-.�t�*��: -_ - �. nrs_ -.a>='tea-:, .iLzi.Q Ye`�t"".,,,-� Y.�,_�..3t�!?:F :.�,*tiu'"e��,... -v�r,-.:. ,.5�"s-ti��r�" � n •'`r`aa`'yy. .�.�=.�z tY-£'3� .�`'t+`'a:•*�.`<"fiiYN.7-�' i�'tEc -�+.�`�.: ..�la7w.%SieiS�l`..f •a_�t.Sri��S...�,.:.- "h,- -,�'� wY.. �.,;a 3- �S°.'.abF� -d"e-°.�'i> _ e _ ��'.:.-(ya,�4'r»j�..�•✓y..% a:d�m:�„ -N..:v-v �� 3'r�+- .H.�•4~� v�i:�l_._a, k Attachments & Exhibits � - I Attachment A Excerpts from the Noise element Attachment B AQMD Letter and E-mail Attachment C Notice of Determination Attachment D Petition against the Proposed Project Attachment E Bobbie Kay Forbes Letter Attachment F Proof of Publication Attachment G Appeal Application Attachment H Approved June 16th Planning Commission minutes (Manhole Builders) Attachment I June 16th Agenda, Planning Commission Staff Report and May 19th minutes Attachment J May 19th Agenda, Planning Commission Staff Report Aittachment K Information Supplied by Manhole Builders Exhibit 1 Site Plan Exhibit 2 Floor Plan Exhibit 3 Planting Plan Exhibit 4 SWPPP Erosion Control Plan Exhibit 5 Aerial Photo Exhibit 6 Assessor Parcel Map xhibit 7 Zoning and General Plan Designations espectfully sub- ed r+, eff Gollihar lanning Technician I I I • � _a � r.t r a �IIIIUWI % == -- I I �. _- _ - `/,t• i'�° I. •III \f)II III II \. '� - I I �,; - 1 ___ r�n°�1tl� •��IIIII NI(I 0�� •'lllll 11-t`. mrtm�m iiu ➢➢➢��QQQI/I I I -s= _ .luaem la I' 'VII'IV�I@UIIl��fV� 1 Ii�Ill'!i' .�.;t,�" I � I• � •� -'. i'—li '14)II�I�la- 'I VIIVII@@I��f�NN e - m�I n I I I• I j - ` � _ [1V' I IL I ;I I I I , I la al -- B.� I/i1�Vi'8iirpl�fiili4��ll l[ilh - _ _ )I l�➢VIfVVII .V� I@@VUV@UIU,_ v��:i a _ I I' •' i I I t �"• Ill'U1llIV IV I —• _ to MI _ t ilia tmi Whom _ I Utfi�l i I L III IIVIIVIIVUIDIVt'„ u' CITY OF Future (2015) CNEL Noise Contours FIGURE 3 1RAND TERRA CE ► "' I r j I �' I: I u �� i �'it 1■ ' oil III it Olin I I ► . ► �� p � l P ' ' III II �•i I I I � � ..�� 4 II II11 Ili l� �I I I .��I I III I� I IIIIIs II 1 . I c 'II �,111111 RlillMum Hill � I ��►'� i� +AS;�v`��"boy • 0 f•;��- ' 'A � �,� ' ," ' ._ VMS 4 �oI all III III it 'I ' �t1 r Al M �� - �1:z'�•I ' Threshold of pain-�-120 dB(A) Disco 110 dB(A) Textile mill r Printing plant 100 dB(A)- Jackhammer at 50' Power lawn mower at 5' 90 dB(A) Heavy truck at SO' Concrete mixer at 50' 80 dB(A) — Inside car at 40 mph 10 dB change generally perceived as twice or half as-loud Vacuum cleaner at 10' 70 dB(A) Car, 60 mph at 100' Conversational speech 60 dB(A) 5 dB change generally Large transformer at 50'• —perceived as quite notideable Urban residence 50 dB(A) 13 dB change is generally barely perceptible Small town residence t - 40 dB(A) 1 dB change is generally not Soft whisper at 6' noticeable i 30 dB(A) North rim of Grand Canyon 20 dB(A)- 10 dB(A) Threshold of hearing • 0 dB(A). CITY OF Common Noise Sources GRAND TERRACE and A-Weighted Noise Levels FIGURE 5j [Land Use Category CNEL, dB Legend 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential - Single family, A A B'':::`:' ;' C ;;' NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE multifamily, duplex Specified land use is satisfactory based on the assumption that any Residential - Mobile homes A A . ; :s:;; <::;:': ?:?: : buildings involved are of nonnal conventional construction, without Transient Lodging- Motels, hotels A A ,:B.. B:,,•,, G {. ::: :`.:'; any special Horse insulation requirements Schools, Libraries, Churches, A A Hospitals, Nursing Homes _l � CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE New construction or development Audrtol-rurns, Concert Halls, should be undertaken only after a Amphitheaters, Meeting Halls detailed analysis of the noise Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator A A A ::8.:.::`.: ::.: requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included Sports, Amusement Parks in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks A A A supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice Golf Courses, Riding Stables, A A A A Cemeteries'] NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE Office and Professional Buildin s A A A B.':;; ` :B'? .?'' .; :> New construction or development g should generally be discouraged. Tf it does proceed, a detailed analysis of Commercial Retail, Banks, A A A A ::.:;) ;;,' ':°:.:B' "':>':';C ;:: the noise reduction requirements Restaurants, Theaters must be made and needed noise in- sulation features included in the design. Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, A A A A Whclesale, Service Stations CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction or development Agriculture A A A A A A A should generally not be undertaken. Source: Taken in part from "Aircraft Noise Impact Planning Guidelines for Local Agencies,"U.S. Dept.of Housing and Urban Development, TE/NA-472, November 1972. = nF GRAND TEI�I�1 CE Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments FIGURE 7 5 J , 9 South Coast i Air Quality Management District• 21865 Conley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 _. (909) 396-2000 . www.agmd.gov FAXED: JUNE 29, 2005 June 29, 2005 Mr. Gary L:Koontz', Community Development Director CE F �- City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department JUL 01 2005 j 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 ;v,t =- t=. ' DUSTS _ Pianning-/Community -,. ,er .3i& %5- Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed 1E'r oiec� 06 and E-05-04 ; The South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. As apotentially responsible agency for the proposed project(page 2 of the Environmental Checklist form),the SCAQMD finds that the MND does not provide quantitative construction or operational air quality information. As a result,the SCAQMD cannot rely on this MND as the CEQA document for any permit application received by the SCAQMD for this project. The SCAQMD-requests that the lead agency, revise the MND by quantifying construction and operational air quality impacts and recirculate the document pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15073.5. The SCAQMD staff would be happy to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other questions,that may arise:Please contact Gordon Mize,Air Quality Specialist—CEQA Section, at(909) 396-3302, if you have any questions regarding these comments. ; Sincerely, Steve'Smith, Ph.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Planning, Rule,Developri ent&Area Sources. Attachment _ • i SS:GM ti SBC050617-0-1 Control.Number Attachment B i i Mr. Gary L. Koontz, -1- June 29, 2005 Community Development Director Draft Negative Mitigated Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Project Title SA-05- 06 and E-05-04 Short and Long Term Air Quality Impacts i 1. The lead agency has concluded on page 12 in Section V. Air Quality of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) that the proposed project will have less than significant air quality impacts. The lead agency did not, however, support its conclusion by quantifying the proposed project's construction and operational air quality impacts. The SCAQMD therefore recommends that for this current project and for future projects that the lead agency quantify short- and long-term air quality impacts. This is important because although the proposed construction activities are temporary in nature, existing land uses to the south and to the east of the proposed site are single family and pre-existing residences. If these surrounding sensitive receptors are less than one-quarter mile from the proposed site, they may be exposed to emissions from fugitive dust, off- and on-road vehicles and equipment, architectural coatings and other emission sources associated with the construction and operation of the proposed project. This information is also important for the SCAQMD, as a responsible agency,because SCAQMD permit engineers rely on the CEQA document when processing subsequent permit applications submitted by the project proponent. Therefore, the MND should be revised and recirculated pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15073.5 to include construction and operational emission estimates, emission factors,methodologies and control efficiencies for the proposed mitigation measures. This information could be included in the Final MND in a table, as part of the narration or as an appendix. To quantify air quality impacts, the lead agency can utilize the current CARB URBEMIS 2002 emissions model,which can be accessed at i http://www.arb.ca.goy/planning/urbemis/urbemis2002/urbemis2002.htm or follow the calculation methodologies in Chapter 9 and the Appendix to Chapter 9 in the South j Coast AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. I In the event that quantification of the air quality impacts from the proposed project, I either construction and/or operational, exceed established significance thresholds, mitigation measures may be necessary. In addition to the lead agency's identification of feasible mitigation measures on page 12, the lead agency should also specify the control efficiency of each mitigation measure (if one is available) and apply the control efficiency to the total emissions estimated for the project. In this way the lead agency can quantitatively determine the significance of air quality impacts from the proposed project. I ' i Mr. Gary L. Koontz, -2- June 29, 2005 Community Development Director Draft Neizative Mitigated Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Proiect Title SA-05- 06 and E-05-04 Short and Long Term Air Quality Impacts, cont. 2. On pages 12 and 13, the lead agency in Section V.(b) defines sensitive receptors in its General Plan Air Quality Element"as schools,hospitals, convalescent homes and nursing homes"therefore stating that the closest sensitive receptor, Grand Terrace Elementary School, is about one-half mile southeast of the proposed project site. In Chapter 5 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Handbook), the SCAQMD includes residences in its definition of sensitive receptors because residences can-be occupied by small children,the elderly and people who might have heart or lung conditions that potentially could be aggravated by a project's short- and long-term air quality impacts. Therefore,the SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency amend its definition of sensitive receptors both in its General Plan Air Quality Element and in the revised MND. The lead agency should also include in the revised MND the distances from the residences to the project site described as surrounding land uses on page one of the Draft MND. 3. The analysis of air quality impacts should also include the influence of complying with SCAQMD Rule 403 —Fugitive Dust. Traffic Impacts 4. Under Services—Traffic/Access on pages 13 and 14 of the Draft MND, the lead agency includes project estimates for daily contractor truck,heavy-duty delivery truck and employee vehicles in the Draft ND but does not include even summarized findings by the lead agency of M the levels of service and volume to capacity ratio impacts for the affected project intersections near the proposed project site or the significance thresholds used by the lead agency to determine that traffic impacts are less than significant. In addition, VMT assumptions.made in the traffic analysis should be consistent with the VMT used in the air quality analysis. The traffic is important relative to air quality because it will determine whether or not / a CO,hot spots analysis should be prepared. The lead agency is reminded that all for all intersections affected by the proposed project, a CO hot spots analysis is recommended to be performed for all intersections that experience a volume to capacity increase of two percent or more as a result of a proposed project for intersections rated D or worse. i Mr. Gary L. Koontz, -3- June 30, 2005 Community Development Director Draft Negative Mitigated Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Project Title SA-05- 06 and E-05-04 Traffic Impacts, cont.: 4. Should the lead agency, after estimating the proposed project's traffic impacts, believe that a CO hotspots analysis is warranted, please refer to the most current Cal Trans-guidance regarding performing a CO hotspots analysis. This information can be obtained at the following internet address: http://www.dot.ca..gov/hq/env/air/coprot/htm . Mitization Measures—Construction: 5. In the event that the lead agency's air quality analysis shows that any criteria pollutant emissions exceed the SCAQMD's daily significance thresholds,the SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency consider modifying the following mitigation measures for construction impacts on page 12 and adding the following mitigation measures to further reduce fugitive dust (PM10) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) impacts from the project, if feasible: Recommended Changes: 1. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into the grading plans and activities. (The lead agency should list the specific mitigation measures it intends to apply to reduce fugitive dust from grading and other site preparation activities); 2. Water trucks will be available during all grading activities to control dust generation (state the frequency of the watering, e.g. twice daily, etc.); 3. Dust control measures shall be taken including the use of"clean" street sweepers to sweep fe� all paved roads, driveways and access points during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Avenue to the project to prevent visible soil from being carried onto adjacent public paved roads (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water); ! Recommended Additions: R Apply non-toxic soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). 0 Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as possible Mr. Gary L. Koontz, -4- June 30, 2005 Community Development Director Draft Negative Mitigated Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Project Title SA-05- 06 and E-05-04 Mitigation Measures - Construction, cont.: Recommended Additions, cont.: • Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. • Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators; • Use low sulfur diesel for construction equipment. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Prevent trucks from idling longer than five minutes; • Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. • Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-peak hour to the extent practicable. • Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. • Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on- and off-site. • Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community liaison concerning on-site construction activity including resolution of issues related to PM10 generation. �po se o Page 'tdAQMD Comments dated June 29, 2005 from the P�oj��cj Proponent From: "Gordon Mize" <gmize@aqmd.gov> To: "Jeff Gollihar" <JGOLLIHAR@cityofgrandterrace.org> Date: 8/17/05 10:54AM Subject: Response to SCAQMD Comments dated June 29, 2005 from the Project Proponent Jeff, SCAQMD staff has reviewed the air quality impacts analysis (Giroux& Associates, August 10, 2005) related to SCAQMD comments (SCAQMD letter to the City of Grand Terrace dated June 29, 2005 reference Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for Proposed Project Title SA-05-06 and E-05-04) and have no further comments on SCAQMD comment number one (1) and comment number three (3). Comments number two (2), four(4), and five (5) are still outstanding and should be addressed by the lead agency in the Final MND. If you have any questions concerning SCAQMD staff comments, do not hesitate to contact me. Gordon E. Mize Air Quality Specialist CEQA Section (909)396r3302 Phone (909)396-3324 Fax gmize@aqmd.gov . rrTHE V'0W'T- ' �� ~"� ==K~� �� »��d�/��U=k Q 0y� » �� ~��~ �� POSTED ~~, , . , __ ~_ . COUNTYOF Community and Economic Development Department ��K�� GRAND TERRACE CALIFORNIA CITY ��o ��n�x~^ �� nu~o�u��v��~ ��~U�� k� ��l[��U�K��~U�� NOTICE ��x DETERMINATION To: cke[kof the Board From: City of Grand Terrace County of San Bernardino Community Development Department | 385N. Arrowhead Hwy. 2n' Floor 22785 Barton Road San Bernardino, CA 92415-0103 Grand Terrace, CA92313 Documentary Handling Fee: ($35.00) Receipt Numberc?,Zs,��-7 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Sections 21108 or21152 of the Public Resources Code for Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-06 and Environmental Review Case No. 05- 04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project vvi|| oonoietoffheoonmanyionmfaneriatinQ single story, 1.350 square foot home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion ofan existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3.500 aquonm feet of material storage warehouse. There will also be approximately 70.000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for construction | yard. ' - PROJECT LOCATION: The subject site is located at 21712 Vivienda Avenue (A5.U4 acre parcel located on the north side ofViviendo Avenue east of Terrace Avenue.) APPLICANT: Manhole Builders, 5021 Stone Ave., Riverside, CA925O9 ' ' This is to advise that the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace approved the Negative Declaration under E-05-O4 for the above described project on and had made the following determinations regarding the above project: . 1. The projectvvil| nothaYea significant effect on the environment. 2. AMitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project purouonttotheprovioioneofCE(]A. 3' Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of this project andanlitigationrnmnitoring plan/program was not adopted. 4. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions ofCE{}/\. This is to certify that the final Mitigated Negative Declaration and record of project approval is available to the General Public atthe Community D`vo|opnnont Department, City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313. Gary L. Koontz Date Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace (800) 490-2247 . o:\MyFi|eo\JOHN\Manho|e%NnUcmofoote,minauon'Monho|e Attachment C 22795 Barton Road w Grand Terrace, California 92313'5295 � Community and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Title: SA-05-06 and E-05-04 (Site and Architectural Review No.'s 05-06 and Environmental Review No. 05-03) Applicant: Manhole Builder, Inc. 5021 Stone Ave. Riverside, CA 92509 Project Description: The approved project will consist of the conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home into an office for a manhole production and installation company, This project will also consist of the conversion of an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouse. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. Location: The subject site is at 21712 Vivienda Avenue (A 5.04 acre parcel located on the north side of Vivienda Avenue east of Terrace Avenue.) Findings of Exemption (required findings are listed below): 1. The City of Grand Terrace has prepared an Initial Study to evaluate the potential adverse environmental effects of the proposed project; and 2. When considering the whole of the record, finds no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect of fish and wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the fish and wildlife depends. 3. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted any presumption of adverse effect on fish and wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the fish and wildlife depends. Certification: I hereby certify that as the lead agency, the City of Grand Terrace has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the Initial Study and the record of public hearing, the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on fish or wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Gary L. K ontz Date Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace CA 92313 (909) 430-2247 �;:V.AManholeCaliffishandgamedeminimus 22795 Barton Road ® Grand Terrace, California 923 1 3-5 295 ® 909/ 824-6621 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY y- s R—-7 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ` f, ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a( ) Lead Agency: Date: County%State Agency of Fi hg: Document No.: project Title: -0 pp/ r n• v,S-03 Pho eTJ berf7' Prbj ct Ap II an a v Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant(check appropriate box): Local Public Agency Sc ool District Other Special District State Agency � Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: w ( ) Environmental Impact Report / $850.00 $ ( ) Negative Declaration C.// (�?� $1,250.00 $ ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion(State'Watr R eesources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ ( unty Administrative Fee ��$ �� roject that is exempt from fees TOTAL REC D $ Signature and title of person receiving payment. WHITE-PROJECT APPLICANT YELLOW-DFGIFAS PINK-LEAD AGE GOLDENRO TATEA NCYOFFILING PETITION AGAINST THE•PROPOSED MANHOLE BUILDERS PROJECT AND INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Planning Commission Meetine scheduled for JUKE 16,2005 i THE FOLLOWING COLTON AND GRAND TERRACE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE PROPOSED MANHOLE BUILDERS SITE AT VIVIENDA AND TERRACE ROAD, GRAND TERRACE DO HEREBY REQUEST THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REJECT THE APPLICATION AS IT IS CURRENTLY PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AT A r MINIMUM CONTINUE IT FOR AT,LEAST 30 DAYS TO ALLOW THE RESIDENTS, THE DEVELOPER, AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) AND THE CITIES OF GRAND TERRACE AND COLTON TO REVIEW AND IVESTIGATE THE MANHOLE BUILDERS PROPOSED APPLICATION. ADDRESS PHONE # _ NAME = 7G- �rV�4 ve ky r . '#ice x / G d i vr`_ a Iv -4 9a9 _ S_ S 7 n LA(k i S�Sox{� e.nki C'Z3 (DS I j ! Q 5 Oav'A a 9-2? z'/ ? v�3- G� cQ — 2 CC: Grand Terrace; City Council, City Manager, Planning Commission, Planning Director and the City of Colton Planning Department Attachment D PETITION AGAINST THE PROPOSED MANHOLE BUILDERS PROJECT AND INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for JUNE 16, 2005 THE FOLLOWING COLTON AND GRAND TERRACE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE PROPOSED MANHOLE BUILDERS SITE AT VIVIENDA AND TERRACE ROAD, GRAND TERRACE DO HEREBY REQUEST THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REJECT THE APPLICATION AS IT IS CURRENTLY PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AT A MINIMUM CONTINUE IT FOR AT LEAST 30 DAYS TO ALLOW THE RESIDENTS, THE DEVELOPER, AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) AND THE CITIES OF GRAND TERRACE AND COLTON TO REVIEW AND IVESTIGATE THE MANHOLE BUILDERS PROPOSED APPLICATION. NAME ADDRESS P NE # 9s f g-Ee goy 0'4742 t y/r y a✓{ �y- d3. CC: Grand Terrace; City Council,'City Manager, Planning Commission, Planning Director and the City of Colton Planning Department Ii RE: MANHOLE BUILDERS PROJECT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION MAY 19, 2005 THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED MANHOLM BUILDERS SITE AT VIVIENDA AND TERRACE ROAD, GRAND TERRACE DO HEREBY REQUEST THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REJECT THE APPLICATION AS IT IS CURRENTLY PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AT LEAST CONTINUE IT FOR A MINIMUM OF 30.DAYS TO ALLOW THE RESIDENTS, THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITIES OF GRAND TERRACE AND COLTON TO REVIEW AND IVESTIGATE THE MANNHOLKBUILDERS PROPOSED APPLICATION.,' A7 �- Sri �:d r a : v :'Ear a r 2) 7 �V ✓ �. fe e1N✓lel� ✓ MbNT/�Nd 53_ a /GyS' r/ivl�Ni7� f/✓ G-T ,S TAA tl L G�, ! 6 ! V. ? �-70- v - fLc�A LAJJT vc. --5 Aw � 1 ti � lc 37 IjAoc�IA--ndeAl!AA0ll �3•t�z1� i Jvl-/n� � • B�E.✓3a. �Gr/ 'Z £�'l l U (.;.FN�/� /�'U'� �.�. �1 m /V o2!"u 5 ; `!Z IS-r,4 S Ave. (-,, , T. ' G 33. ' o May 19, 2605 Bobbie Kay Forbes 11850 Burns Ave. Grand Terrace, CA City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA ATT: Planning Commission On May 7 h, 2005 I received a statement in the mail from the City of Grand Terrace regarding the Manhole Builders application. The envelope is postmarked May 5, 2005. 1 began talking to my neighbors and found they too had received the letter that weekend. I purchased the packet from the city to review and started my investigation. I was aware prior to May 7's that the subject property was being purchased. The seller was holding yard sales on the weekends to reduce her possessions to prepare for her big move. She did not share with me the buyer'information., I also know the land adjacent was purchased not too long ago and that owner has not proceeded with developing his land, I believe do to City requirements. I would think the Manhole Builders could in the future make use of that property as well once their business is up and running full scale. I am aware the area will develop and I often say to people in the community I would like to see an area develop in a"neighborhood friendly"way and have the area look good not be"Hodge Podged". We need to seriously consider what effect this business,will do to the local roads and the air that we breath. The trucks from the Stater Brothers warehouse tear up our roads and create quite a traffic nuisance 24 hours.a day on Barton Road. Often trucks get lost and end up in our little neighborhood of Vivienda, Burns, Walnut and Maple Avenues. It is quite dangerous for the rigs to'be turning around at the bridge at Vivienda and Bums Ave. Please drive through the area and investigate the width of Terrace Rd. it is the designated route for the trucks to drive in and out of the Manhole Builders place of business. Thank you for the opportunity to present to the planning commission my request to deny or continue the proposed applicant from Manhole Builders. Cc: City of Grand Terrace, manager, mayor, city council members, planning dept. & staff Attachment E :NOTICE OFA`I?UBCIC HEARINGAND ` INTENT 70 ADO -`'-3ATIVE•DECL•ARATION.. DATE: Thursday,,May,19;.g005'' •:r; PLACE: Council'.Chambbr,22795.B6nbpn Rdad,Grand Terrace;:CA , TIME: 7:00P% - ; ' t THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF-THECITY.OF'GRAND TERRACE'IS SCHEDULED10'HOLD'k PUBGC HEARING"AT THE ABOVE-TIME AND PLACE REGARDING THE FOLLOWING'ITEMe,': . n.,. _:.r v i:it. -•i 1 •. SA•05-06,E-05+04: The;ptojecttivill'consl't1;ot the gpnverslon,41>an . ry,. `manhoie ISM protluction'.;antlr'InstallAUon..'compe'ny Th(s`,projecf,will,also:"cq'nsist'rofithe''conversion entexisting barn.garage and several a outbuildings'into-@pproximetely:.5,000`squeteaeet ofrneferial storage wareliouses,:There Will also be approximately 70 000 square V E, leet'oYouldoor production'and storage fora constructionyard:s`' ,N `- APPLICANT. Manhole;Builders,. 5 v LOCATION;. 21712Viviende'Aven6e;'APN 0275;191.02• Pursuant to the California Environmental'Quality qct,a;Negiitive:Declaretion under,&05.04 is hereby;propoaed;ontha above described project with the intent to adopt said Negative Declarationl:eed on diet'basis;tlie;said,propoaed:project will not.have a significant effect on the environ- meet Plans for the proposed project end;copiee of tiie.proposed Negative;Declaration_Will be:available for,public.revtew:at,the offices of the' Community Development Departmeht In'Clty Hal at 22785 Berton Roed ln,Grend Terrece,,during normal business hours:The 21 day public review 1. o period will begin on Thursday,April 26,2005.. Z. C3 Anyone wishing to speck in'tavoi of or in opposition'to,the above;listed item•wlll;be'g van the opportunity to doso,before'the'Planning,Commission. Pursuant 00 to Government Code Section 65009(b)(2):;It.you challenge the nature of,tfie proposed acilon.16 court;you may beAmiWd to•raising ohly those issues you U) orsomeone else'raised at the public hearing described in this_notice or in written correspondence•delN_eyed_to.ft public entity conducting the'hearing at or m prior to the public hearing.° - ;r U If you have any,questions•regarding.thispmject,the'publio'hearingr60his.nc)tice,please'coniact,Mr:Jeff'Goitifiar,Plamriing Technician;In the Community Development Depar( enf of,lhe 0ity of_Giand.7errase,'at(809),'430,2256;" s ,-• r: ? Gary'L:Koonti,Community Development Director, m LLJ _ YS`r'd t PublLh 040105 SBSN8MI02 j U aI`y N C 0 CO } as3gZ 0 _ 1 c'CT m« m Z � M m o-0 U) ar< c m e 0 or U T- Q ar 2f 0z ¢ E o 0 f= � M W N 'L� U Co m �Ir 0 cc oco � NIn Cl)ao r U N•0. ¢ 3 W i6 t �¢ E `o: siZ Q L- c `1 0 Z x LL U_ Q Jm C m Z�0 0LE a LL • u) N(0❑ L 0 CL p D V 7 0 V ( OL . C 7 p Z z � a � U Qza N o� a w ` o.Z ) ^—J\ - m w `h n Q lY �' "' 2 o ro•o 0 a0i o0' m C ) aoi m v o rn o or C '=t") ClD C T V) Q z � o Z y c o c rn C m¢ Cl) 0LLJ U. u'"i ¢ > � asmarpoo�L« DY m Uo m U Q I— O ^^ > m m n°Zzm�m c aa)i ° ar W I=0 LL z O ro (nas0.C�o ` ooa� w a m U - Q m L1. ¢ C7 z � ' °U¢'� o� a' ca ¢ '0 ❑ c 0) Q z o � � m�zcc mco0a`r c Q co CU EL U F- O Ct Z =ar r E❑m r- D m r- CL C N 10m EL O Z "'m`OOUZ 0'm- M 3 GUCV � fi `0 O Z C /V O•� O C N C D �� 0. �U) o ar � Zom;j00)a �� U a a -= cu E¢ �as La a) 3 . o FT N ca'0Q 3 vai E c c o� c0i ar ro °� y ° o � ar t= ar 0 ❑ Ear w c�asmN 0 cnU z° Q i° oacrmEi cis 0C) % 00 MAILING/POSTING VERIFICATION 5)5 /C5 �4 On this date the attached document(s)was: �^ 05 Posted at the subject site. .Posted at City Hall,the library and the senior center. I Mailed tb.the ,operty, owner(s),(list ached�.if not addressed). AIL �5- .4a. By`certified mail _ y,, .gulag=mail y ot*'In 1Vlailed to reviewin-g ageriey(s)(list attached if not adds_essed' `,. ` :By7e ular`mail'` ertedmail' By otler,.mearis.:__ • - Delive%ed'to_'tlie newspaper:.- •' -�'• - e Suri- Pre'ss",Enter•rise'r-==rp_ -Ci iI News - -B"EiY1a1 B H2tid` B" ._ Y:' Y' re .Ar mail Y.:; . _ -- I••�eri" .thattheabo�e<ac�ons�bccuired=as -- - - _ - .. - A,:'- - - S. - vi+- . C•' -`uni`�and�Ecorioriic'' D'evelo��ment;De artineiit��ecre• -- - - - �Y z" �� ui'iuer for a mannoie production and installat ion company. This project will also consist of the conversion an existing barn, garage and,several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and: storage for-a construction yard. APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: 21712 Vivienda Avenue,APN 0275-191-02 Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration under E-05-04 is hereby proposed on the above described project with the intent to adopt said Negative Declaration; and on that basis, the said proposed project will not have a significant,effect on the environment. Plans for the proposed project and copies of the proposed Negative Declaration will be available for' public review at the offices of the Community Development Department in City Hall at 22795 Barton Road in Grand Terrace, during normal business hours. The 21 day public review period will-begin on Thursday,April 28,2005. Anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition-to the above listed item will be given the opportunity to do so before the Planning Commission. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b)(2): "If you challenge the nature of the proposed,action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the public entity conducting.the hearing at or prior to the public hearing." If you have any questions regarding this project, the public hearing or this notice, please contact Mr. Jeff Gollihar, Planning Technician, in the Community Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace,.at(909)430.2256. Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director I , i GITf' C 1 I i GRAND TERR CE ; Community Development Department LOVEDE" ;APPLICATION FOR APPEAL" JUN 2 7 2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE , ;Ty CLERK'S DEr ARTt,'�'jr APPELLANT CASE NO: - 05 - 0 & / C - 05- O� NAME: _IJ ADDRESS: 3 �S q0 l • � Sf o Z CITY: l�rJc2 � ID 6 � - PHONE NO: 7O( - 7-C17) 7�'7�oUI� SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 21 ? 2. y l V l E h1 D,g A-V F-)._ � ��I�/�AC APPEAL This application is for the purpose of appealing the following: ! A Decision by the Planning Director to the Planning Commission _ A Decision by the Planning Commission to the City Council* Please specify what portions of the Planning Director's or Planning Commission's determination you are appealing: I • 22?0 -c_- WI- -A e--Orjbi 1 cads Cif S14- 0 -0(, T) FC Lfq-124T I CJ AJ Attachment G 22795 Barton Road e Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 (5v7) bz-,+-vv=1 Please state any facts regarding this case which you feel are in dispute: r%�4C►L OF— T(zoT(!�fl- W TCCE Atin '�E'� I r=w 7ezco/- . MSA O-Y- (. IA73i c. �r y Fl�0 $�� SS --1D c<`�., AHD GiTr �S W 1 ilk No Ti4,K P'tUt►J u e, w 2-3G 55 . N y rz t-e-jcA-<- `5>76.)n iej� Please explain why you feel the Planning Director's or Planning Commission's determination should be changed by the reviewing body. Be specific and include any evidence which supports your position: µ , STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION I verify that the information I have provided in this application is true and correct. 46 Appell Date Note: * If the matter involved a public hearing before the Planning Commission,then the City Council will consider the appeal at its own public hearing. cAMyFilesVOIn Torum1appeal AS TO BOTH THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE,AND ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW: INADEQUATE NOTICE ❑ Some citizens and clients within 300 feet were not noticed until May 8, 2005 (lack of adequate'review period). ❑ Correct attachments were not available until June 13,2005, (3 Days before Second Hearing). ❑ AMQD were not properly noticed or sent their requested documents. APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS ❑ Only three planning commissioners present on May 19,2005 and June 16, 2005. ❑ One Planning Commissioner had not been present at the first hearing (Mr. Comstock). ❑ On June 16, 2005 public comment was limited to new information, for three minutes maximum, thus this Planning Commissioner did not get to hear all of the public's comments and concerns, nor view the citizens substantial visual presentations. GOV.CODE 4 65588 ❑ Periodic evaluation of general plan may be appropriate for this entire M-2 area. SAFETY ❑ Roads: -Size -Use -Bridges ultimately to be replaced,thus forcing trucks into residential areas. ❑ Dust (Air quality management reports are missing). ❑ Noise: -Cement mixer 7 a.m. —8 p.m. @ 55db Monday through Saturday. -Trucks: Unloading and stacking ❑ Oleander bushes as mitigation (danger to children and animals). ❑ Signage on streets (none). ❑ Water Quality (clean out was not addressed). ❑ Flooding increases. EXPENSE TO CITY AND CITIZENS ❑ Roads: Repair and upgrade @ 50 trips per day. ❑ Liability for injuries from accidents on our streets. ❑ Liability for injuries from dust blown into the neighborhoods. ❑ Lowering of property values for residential properties. ❑ Setting this as precedent for other development. ❑ Code enforcement/citations. ❑ Signage. ❑ Storm drain. 1 ❑ Increased flooding. ❑ Exempting applicant from improving Vivienda Street. Why? ❑ Street address- can't be found. We will have lost vehicles looking for this address (Fire/Ambulance/UPS/Fed Ex?Pizza?) Based on all of the above, is this really an appropriate M-2 application? 2 i ! i a I Community and Economic Development Department AGENDA CALIFORNIA THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WILL BE HELD ON -DATE: July 21, 2005 ` PLACE: Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795, Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 7:00 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Call to Order i F I • Pledge of Allegiance • Roll Call ' • , Public address to Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless ` extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, }' please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community and Economic Development. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:! I • This is a time for anyone in the audience to speak on any item, which is not on the agenda for this!meeting. i ITEMS: 1. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of ! June 16; 2005 r RECOMMENDATION: Approval i I Attachment H 22795 Barton Road i® Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 a I �v ,R �Nt Community and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING June 16, 2005 The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Planning Commission was called to order at the Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 16, 2005, at 7:05 p.m., by Vice Chairperson Matthew Addington PRESENT: , Matthew Addington, Vice Chairperson Robert Bidney, Commissioner Tom Comstock, Commissioner Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Lampe, Associate Planner Jeff Gollihar, Planning Technician Jo Verhelle, City Manager's Secretary ABSENT: Doug Wilson, Chairperson Brian Whitley, Commissioner Michelle Boustedt, Planning Secretary 7:05 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING • Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Comstock • Roll Call PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: NONE ITEM 1 22795 Barton Road ® Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 © 909/ 824-6621 ITEMS: 1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 1-9, 2005 MOTION PC-22-2005': Commissioner Bidney made a motion to approve the minutes of May 19, 2005 ! Vice' Chair Addington seconded the motion i - MOTION VOTE PC-22-2005: Approved 2-0-2-1 Commissioner Comstock Abstained Chair Wilson Absent Commissioner Whitley Absent 2. SA-05-06 E-05-04: Continuation of the project that will consist of a conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot,home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion of an existing barn, garage and j several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: 21712 Vivienda Avenue, Assessor's Parcel Number 0275-191- 02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and approve SA-05-06 and E-05-04 with conditions. Planning Technician Gollihar: Thank you Vice Chairman and members of the Commission. My name is Jeff Gollihar and I am a member of the staff. As I have stated the applicant is requesting a site and architectural review to convert an existing single family, single story residence which is a non-conforming use in an industrial area into an office and also converting some barns, garage, and some other out buildings for storage and also developing about 7,000 square feet for outdoor storage. f The residence is located at 21712 Vivienda. It cannot be entered from that road; it has to be entered from Terrace Avenue and an easement. The residence is a legal non-conforming use in a the General Plan Designation as an Industrial site and it is zoned M2 Industrial. The properties directly to the north, east, west and to the southwest are also zoned M2 properties. To the east and to the direct south are zoned R2 Medium to Low Density Residential. The property to the { south is zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential. i i The subject site fronts on Vivienda but because of a 60 to 70 foot cliff, the property is basically unapproachable through Vivienda. The only access is through the easement off of Terrace Avenue which is a public street in the City of Grand Terrace. The subject site is approximately 2 1,150 feet from the, Santa Ana River but is not within the Santa Ana River right of way, easements or any area associated with the Santa Ana River. Therefore, this project is in the jurisdiction of the City of Grand Terrace. The Santa Ana River is a 303D,Impaired body of water which needs to be addressed again for best management practices of the WQMP permit, so that there is no gentle runoff into the Santa Ana River. Also, the San Bernardino County Flood Control through their historical maps show both in the January and February, 1969 flood maps, I was told that those were the two maps that were considered the worst flood year on record for the Santa Ana River in that area according to the San Bernardino County Flood Control Planning Department. The Federal Emergency Management Agency Map shows that in February 23, 2005, a revised LOMR effective March 18, 1996, indicates that a 100 year flood plane has been altered. A portion of it is still within the flood plane. The subject site as was indicated is an industrial zoned M2. This particular project would fit that category. The San Bernardino County Fire Department was again contacted to review this . particular project as requested by Commissioner Bidney. The conditions are enclosed in the staff report. The ire department's major concern was how they werergoing to.put out any fires in the area. Their request is that they have a fire hydrant within 150 feet of any building, therefore, as was concurred by the water company, there will have to be an onsite fire hydrant as well a fire hydrant in front of the property. That was their main concern. They considered the road stable enough for them to get down on, and they also considered some others things with regard to fire access to the,property. There were six,different things that both the Planning Commission and the residents of the area were concerned about. One was the environmental assessment; in that particular.Negative Declaration, there were some errors in it and as stated at the last meeting, those errors were corrected. There were also some concerns with traffic and road conditions. These conditions were met in a letter that was written by the City Traffic Engineer wrote how there would be some type of paving along Terrace Avenue as well as paving inside of the particular;project. There =' were also some issues about flooding. The County Flood Control was contacted and those concerns were taken care of through the conditions from the WQMP and also by the Flood Control map with regard to 100 year flood. There were concerns about air quality. Two air quality permits have been issued and there are other concerns that we can address during this meeting. As was stated again, the County Fire Department as well as the Riverside Highland Water Company addressed the issues with the water line taken down Terrace Avenue, across the easement to the property itself. There were concerns about noise. The Conditions.states that at the property line, the decibel readings need to be at 55 and the other half, modified through whatever to make it happen. Therefore based upon the fact that this is a project.suitable for the area, and it appears as though that through the environmental study and through the efforts of the applicant, this project. The Staff finds that SA-05-06 and E-05-04 meets all the findings of the Zoning Code regarding this project. That concludes my presentation. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you. Are there any questions for staff at this time? Commissioner Bidney: I have a question. In relationship to the' ingress and egress of this property, if I'm correct,_we're using a Vivienda address., Anybody coming to the property without proper notification will never find the property. I don't know if that's our custom to have an address for a business that is not locatable and doesn't have a driveway in existence, that's one question, the other question is., ingress and egress of this whole area; this is the west side of town and I don't know of any traffic control or anything,over in that area. The west side of Stater Bros. is owned by Colton and under proposition item two the traffic engineer is going to take 3 I , care of the road, and I don't see how he can do that without getting permission from Colton and I don't see how we're going to spend the money, our portion of Grand Terrace homes is from Vivienda to the applicant's property and that is not a two way street really, doesn't have any painted lines down it and we're going to have 10 wheel trucks coming out of there and then we're going to have a low boy delivery truck trailer that's going to be 40 feet long that's going to deliver concrete manholes and there's no way that he's going to be able to come up Terrace Road and make a right hand turn to La Cadena over the bridge and he's not going to be able to make a left hand turn without using all the road there is, so my assumption is he's going to come up Terrace Road, to Walnut, over to Burns to Vivienda and he's going to make a right hand turn across the existing railroad track. He's either going to come out on Grand Terrace Road or La Crosse. He's going to use that whole residential area for ingress and egress for all of these trucks, and I don't understand it. Planning Director Koontz: My question back to you is how many trucks do you think are goini_ be generating by this project? What is all this traffic? Commissioner Bidney: Well you're going to have from my understanding two trucks 10 wheelers coming in the morning and two 10 wheelers coming back at night, so that's eight trips as far as can see minimum, plus your going to have delivery of 40 foot low boy delivering material. Now, when the weather is hot, and they slam on those breaks and move that asphalt up into a bunch, the City of Grand Terrace is going to have to repair that. That's a minimum amount of traffic out f there and I think the problem will be worse. I just can't see how we justify that. Vice Chair Addington: Question for staff, do you want to go into this question now, or do we want to take some public input? Planning Director Koontz: The standard procedure is that you have a right to ask us,questions at this point then open the hearing, ask for comments from the applicant and open to the gene public. Vice Chair Addington: Okay, you're turn to answer the question if you desire. I Planning Director Koontz:' Our Condition Number Two as part of the Conditions of Approval is all commercial traffic will be directed onto Terrace Avenue and Barton Road while avoiding any traffic on'Vivienda Avenue., It is a condition of the Conditional Use Permit where if they violate that we have the right to revoke their permit. Vice Chair Addington: Which permit? Planning ,Director Koontz: This land use permit. As a condition of approval of this, if they violate that. Vice Chair Addington: Okay, so we got that one written in this time. Planning Director Koontz: Right. Vice Chair Addington: At this point we will go ahead and open up the Public Hearing. I would like to invite the Applicant to come up and address the Commission. i Stacey Jaureguy: My name is Stacey Jaureguy and I am representing the applicant and project manager for Manhole Builders. The address is 5021 Stone Avenue in Riverside. First of all, I would like to begin by thanking you for the opportunity to continuerthis hearing today. We have i 4 i prepared a list of issues that are concerns in relation to comments that have been made by the Commission as well as the residents. Some of them are actually issues that Jeff has addressed, if you would bare with me, I would like to go through them. Apparently, as Jeff, mentioned, some of these concerns are because of these errors made on the environmental report so obviously people. would be concerned because it wasn't consistent with our project. Greater problems were initiated by a resident outside the neighborhood; who misrepresented the nature of our business, telling our neighbors that we were putting -a rock and sand quarry in and that the concrete production would ruin the environment and the health of..the neighbors. Now, if I was a resident and I heard that, I would be very concerned as well. Yes, we are going to be manufacturing pre-cast concrete products, manholes to be exact, but it will not impact the environment or health of the residents. That is why such state agencies as the air quality and water quality control boards have been established. No business can run without applying-for a qualifying under the regulations of these agencies to ensure that such quality control measures are adhered to. As far as the cement dust concerns that have been mentioned, we will not be breaking open bags of cement to make up our concrete. That would cause the concrete to go into the air. Rather, we will have a state approved;-permitted storage silo that will hold the cement and which will have required bag house filtration system to keep the cement contained where it.should be. We also have purchased. the smallest industrial concrete mixer we could find on the market which dispenses the cement through a course of enclosed conveyor belts, again, making sure it is to stay where it should be. It also has been approved and permitted by the Air Quality Control Management Board. To clarify an apparent misunderstanding, we will have one truck deliver the product to the installation crew in the field. twice a day, but we do hope someday, to have a second truck as a backup which will bring us to full capacity. The pictures presented to us at the last meeting showed a pre-cast company in Rialto. The worst looking pre-cast plant we have ever seen. But the intentions of the pictures was to depict what our operation was going to look like. Again, this could not be further from the.truth. First of all, their company does not produce the same products that we will manufacture, nor, would we allow the gravel on our roads to. decompose like theirs into a dust like state. .It is unfair to compare us to such a facility. That's like taking a poorly maintained house in the City of Grand Terrace and showing a picture to someone and saying that this is what Grand Terrace looks like. Most people here do take pride in ownership. And we like other well managed companies will consciencsiously take pride in our business ownership and thus maintain our driving areas and storage yard. Another understandable concern was the matter of commercial traffic using the residential streets for access to our property. We would like to assure the residents that Terrace Avenue will be our only access point. There is room for our trucks to make a left hand turn heading south on Terrace Avenue and going east on Barton Avenue. And it is correct it is not possible to make a right hand turn onto La Cadena and we don't have any intentions of doing so. As my next comment will mention, we can use an alternate route if we need to go to La Cadena. A comment was made at the last meeting that Colton has plans to upgrade the bridges that are on Barton, and so that was a concern -of course because they do not want any commercial traffic in their neighborhood. But even when the bridge on Barton is closed for repairs, the east bridge, all trucks will still have access to the Freeway by proceeded south on Terrace if you take Barton east and just jogs over a little bit, it still goes south, it turns into Berry Street as it connects to La Crosse. And if they needed, even at this point before the bridge is ever even worked on, to get back to La Cadena they could make a loop around and head back over that bridge if necessary. 5 i But our suppliers will be give clear directions on how to access the property. I do believe that ' appropriate signs located on Vivienda and Terrace Avenue would be in order to keep trucks from entering the residential district, and I'm sure that everyone would agree with me on that. The conditions of the road 'have also been a matter of discussion, and the parties most concerned with those issues which was the San Bernardino County Fire Department as well as the City Traffic Engineer, both were consulted. twice and have addressed the repairs needed. The Fire Department has also required a fire.hydrant on our property site to ensure emergency �f water needs are met. On the subject of water, some-have stated that the proposed site isl on a hazardous flood zone, which Jeff mentioned. This too has been thoroughly investigated and it has been confirmed by the San Bernardino County Flood Control that due to improvements in adjacent areas, 1M� a flooding zone has been upgraded in status on the latest FEMA Map dated February 23, 21- Even before this upgrade on the FEMA Map, the previous zoning would have not presented any limitations on our abifity10 proceed with our desired plans for the property according to the San Bernardino County Flood control. Our existing business has been in the same location in Riverside for over 20 years. We have run the business over these years with about the same amount of people. We have by choice, kept our operations small over these years. The reason why we are now moving into manufacturing is because our pre-cast supplier changed ownership and their services no longer meet our standards. Also, we are dependant on them, and unfortunately their future is uncertain. This has forced us to make this change, so any comments questioning our intentions to keep our operation small are completely untrue and unfounded. Our desire is to keep it simple, take care of our own supply needs- and hope to continue to maintain a level of sanity, if fwe can in doing so. I But in conclusion, we understand the residents concerns. No one who lives near industi o, zoning really wants to see it used for that purpose. But they can be assured that we will prove to i be an asset to the City. Not only in a financial way, which would also help improve the roads, but we will improve the parcel that we will be occupying and we will be a responsible neighbor. We certainly feel that there is no .reason why we should be denied to use the property in a way consistent with city zoning and municipal codes as well as state and local agencies. We have i pursued working with and have fully cooperated with all agencies which only adds to fine reputation we have built in the industry for being an honest and professionally run business. We hope to set a fine standard for any future business that comes to the City of Grand Terrace. If the Planning Commissioners have any questions, I would be happy to try to answer"them. Vice Chair Addington: Are there any questions for the applicant? Commissioner Comstock: I was looking at the machinery that will be used and searching for a measurable decibel reading during hours of operation. Has there been any kind of a study done j on that machinery to know the volume of the decibel reading on it so we can mitigate those problems and also is there going to be something that can be mitigated. Stacey Jaureguy: That question was asked at the last meeting and we did try to get decibel ` readings. Funny that this would be an issue in more cities than this one, but apparently, it's not because it's something that is in place with these equipment companies. They don't have the decibel readings, even the local companies that we checked with, so as Jeff mentioned, there is a noise ordinance and which we are happy to comply with. We were told by the concrete mixer I 6 i manufacturers that's it is quieter than an idling diesel truck and that's really all that they could compare it to. And really they mentioned that until it's on the site, there are so many factors that can determine whether the noise carries or not, that you really cannot have a clear cut decibel reading for each cement mixer. It has to do with where it is located and certainly in an in place and before we can receive our occupancy permit, we would have to do whatever would be required if those decibel readings are above the standards set by the City, and we don't have any problem with that. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you very much Stacey. I have a stack of request to speak forms. Since this is a continued item, I would like to advise that everyone come speak that you only present new information, and not information that was already presented to us last month, and I ask that you would keep your comments addressed to three minutes. Jerry Guthrie? Jerry Guthrie: I am Jerry Guthrie, I live at 21769 Vivienda Avenue, Grand Terrace, and our house is directly above where the house is they are going to turn into the office. But just to the east is where the mixer is going to be running and we have a lot of children in our neighborhood and as you know, exhaust goes up. Diesel soot will be coming into our neighborhood and I think 'that is unacceptable. If the wind moved in the other direction, that might be different, but the pollution that we are going to have is unacceptable. The other thing is that what guarantee they are going to have when their business takes off and they're making lots of money. They want to have a successful business and they want to grow, what will we do then? Are they going to have eight trips, or will it be sixteen or thirty two trips by next year? Catherine Guthrie: I am Catherine Guthrie I live at 21769 Vivienda Avenue in Grand Terrace. Noise levels, right now when I am outside pulling weeds in my front yard, I hear horses. Horses are pretty quiet, but I hear the horses and it's a wonderful sound. I hate to think that I have put all of these years and investment into my home to hear the sound of diesel trucks with cement mixers. It's going to drop my property values and everyone else's dramatically. I don't know that I do want to sell, but if I did want to sell and I am getting ready to retire fairly soon, within the next fifteen years, I will have nothing to "sell because I will live at the end of town in a City of Industry. I will not be part of the Blue Mountain City; I will part of Blue Mountain Industry. It will become an industrial zone and our properties will .be worth nothing. I resent that my property values are going to drop dramatically, I am sure by half. I love where I live, I love the sound of the horses and roosters, and I love looking out over the mountains. The Santa Ana winds are fierce in our area and I can't imagine this kind of industry with those kinds of winds blowing in our neighborhoods. I climb Blue Mountain several mornings a week, I love where I live because it's quiet and industrial, and I hope this doesn't change my neighborhood. Thank you. Bobbie Forbes: I am Bobbies Forbes I live at 11850 Burns Avenue in Grand Terrace. I don't know if I am really prepared yet, I was a little late coming in. I did pass out a petition that we signed in the neighborhood. Most of the people that are here live in the neighborhood and I handed it over so that you could see the names that are on it. It.does include the names from last month. I appreciate that they have done some more investigating and are eager to please. I don't mean to be rude, but they are willing to cooperate with'the changes in the proposal. I am glad that the City of Grand Terrace has reviewed and corrected it. I have not had the opportunity to review since it has only been made available since Monday or Tuesday of this week. We have been doing as much investigating as we can in that short period of time. I 7 thought that we would get another 21 days to review what went out a couple of days ago, but I guess I was wrong. It is my understanding that the trucks from Stater Bros. are grandfathered in for their noise level i and the pollution that we deal with having come from Stater Bros. Warehouse, but I do know that it is Colton, and I do wonder what will go in there because Stater Bros. is a good neighborhood, they have security out in the neighborhood all the time. They are my best friend at 2 A.M..when 1 I am outside and I can't sleep and trying to figure out what a car is doing going around a corner too fast squealing their tires, so I call security, because the cops don't come very fast. Also, I Wonder if this goes in, I realize that the area down below is going to change at some time are you going to change the zoning where I live and make that industrial and make that R1 cause the plumbing yard -is next door and the Stater Bros. Warehouse is there which is Colton, and then they are going to go in and the other two homes that are there will some day maybe - I and because they will probably get tired of living next door to the Manhole Builders plant ' I whatever else may go in. I am concerned what will happen to my property. I will stay there for awhile because I have a purpose for-living in the neighborhood because I like the rural as opposed to where the houses are so close together. That is my question; I don't what anyone else has brought that up. I am not very prepared, because that's all I have for the moment, but if I think of anything else I will come back up to the podium. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you Bobbie. Staff, just a quick question for the change of zoning, what is the process in that: Planning Director Koontz: Basically any change of zone would require a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change both being heard by the Planning Commission with public hearings and also the City Council. Vice Chair Addington: So it would be a long public process. I Planning Director Koontz: Yes. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you. Leon Berry. i T. Leon Berry: Good evening, my name is T. Leon Berry. I live at 22740 La Paix Street in Grand Terrace. My concern is the untreated ground water that we have with the impurities that might be generated. Also, the trapped air, I'm sure that this will come up mostly because I see when something comes up in the air I do oppose this application based on the fact that I have a home in the Muscoy area that is a mile from the same type of facility and there is a grey dust 1 that is constantly in my filters and along the walls. That is why I am opposed to this project. Thank you. Vice Chair Addington: Jeff McConnell Jeffrey McConnell: So I don't confuse myself with Mr. Gollihar here. I will need a few more minutes here. First of all Bobbie Forbes and I are here as residents and some of you perceive to think that somehow this a battle between the Chamber and the City and it is not. Okay, secondly, I just received this packet on Monday, when it was available to us. It is very difficult to try to review the packet to do research on it. There are some reports in here where I was unable to get in touch with some people. Let me give you this pictorial thing where I showed at the last meeting. I will skip the first page, but the second page, I will show you what a typical 10 wheeler is for those who don't know, at I 8 the left hand -corner. A production facility like this is not going to bring sand and gravel in a pickup truck. Usually a 10 wheeler delivers this. This was taken down at Hedgens which is right on the other side of La Cadena. The picture below showing me bending in a hole with my butt in the air is a sink hole that showed up three days 'after the last meeting belongs to the neighborhood that was repaired quite quickly by the City. The picture to the right of it shows that it wasn't just a little hole, it did go underneath. If you look at the picture where I am looking into the hole, you will see both sides where the hole is, that part of Terrace Road which is just north of Walnut by about 200 feet,, it is a close-up view of how deteriorated that ancient road is. The upper right hand corner, that picture was taken today. People are dumping stuff down there all the time, and it's never been swept and been taken care of. The argument as to whose street this is, it is' Grand Terrace's street. That part has hardly ever been taken care of and that is from the rains six months ago. Last page is a transport'truck in a similar facility. The upper right hand corner shows my Toyota turning right at-the top of Terrace Road onto Barton Road. It is a very dangerous situation that is why I think I took a lot of pictures to show all of the kids bicycling up and down the street. This is the type of neighborhood we live in, and a lot of-people take alternative routes. Some get lost from Stater ,Bros. all of the commercial trucks go zipping right down the street, and I have a'feeling there are a lot of my neighbors here where I think this is a time to request that the entire neighborhood gets reviewed for signage-not just heavy trucks but for speed and speed bumps. On the report, with regard to Condition Three, Terrace Avenue never gets repaired as shown in some of the pictures, unless there is,a sinkhole that pops up. With regard to Condition Six, don't believe that it will stop the dust from the yard, this is the reason why I showed the first page of the pictures from the other .yard where they have a gravel base. Years have built up and can't see how they will be able to maintain the dust and dirt out of the gravel, unless they have a very large vacuum. Condition Fourteen seems impossible. Condition Twenty Five, the residents on Vivienda such as the Guthrie's and their neighbors, it will block their view with all of the proposed landscaping, I'm sure that is why they have lived there was because of the view. With regard to the Traffic Engineers memorandum of May 19, 2005, that was the same night of the previous Planning Commission meeting and it sounds like it wasn't prepared very well, it was just a memorandum and not a full report and does not include any signage at all. In this complete package, there is no mention of any signage that I recall. I also do not know of any plans of future road work. It also,states that the applicant is being condition to repair any pavement failures which are defined in that memorandum as existing gaps in the road. Those gaps will change real quickly once there are in production with those 10 wheelers coming and going every day. With regard to Condition 34, 1 have been over to the lumber yards and the .sawdust which is ,construction debris from the lumber yards is swept up and taken care of on their paved street. I believe it's concrete and pieces of dust is also considered construction debris. That house was built in the sixties at some time and I'm sure that the septic system was built around the same time, I'm sure. According to the report I understand that there will be 10 employees that's coming and going. That house has been supporting two people in that house for a number of years, but I'm sure that septic system is not designed for that type of capacity. As far as the engineering report, Stacey was talking about the permit process with AQMD, I spoke with Scott Linn who signed off and worked on that report, that permit is strictly for the equipment mixer that their requiring and the silo that she mentioned, but did not,make any mention of outdoor, storage, related dust to the outdoor storage that accumulates or what they are not able to clean up. That's about all the time I have. I am.also a developer and I sell real estate, I am not against development, but if there is going to be development, I was beside you 9 with regard to the Outdoor Adventures Center, and every time I hear that I think of the city not wanting anything hodge podge or piece meal, I consider this project as hodge podge and piece meal. Thank you. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you Jeff. William Kaminsky please. Now Mr. Kaminsky, I see you have noted that you wanted 10 minutes of time; you will be given 3 minutes please. Thank you. William Kaminisky: One of the things that should be brought up here is I am one person her that don't trust anyone. So I do my own investigations. In the interim I went and contacted the City of Rialto and the City of Loma Linda and their uniform condition was no way. This does not fit the outline that is shown within the City's zoning right now. Although it says technically, building contractor's storage yard, things like that, this is far beyond that. The County considers this to be a dirty industry, the same as the clay pipe manufacturers and the asbestos cement type f manufacturers. They group them into one area so that they can control them. That is Colton has the one area down by Rancho; they don't put'them all over the place. So this guy is coming to a brand new location. If there was somebody right next to them with a similar operation, there would be no trouble with them. Loma Linda is the one that said no way, we just wouldn't have them come in and develop this type of place. The County also mentioned that this would be under a CUP and under constant inspection for the first two years to make sure that they adhere. Some of the things that have been talked about have been talked about in the wrong manner. One of the things is Flood Control. I will give you my report. I went to the San Bernardino County Flood Control, and they showed a map that has a storm drain cutting through this property, which is not picked up in the staff report. Thusly, this is a master plan and we had a street failure based on this storm drain not beina installed, Grand Terrace Road gave way a few years ago and they had to put in a bypass for That line is shown in the County master plan shows that is cut right into the Rancho line going into the storm channel. I asked them about the situation of flooding that goes down near the bridge, and they said that they hope most of it had to be collected but there has to be a hydrology report it can't shoot off the hip when it is flooding. The City of Colton has already barricaded that are which is about three months out of the whole year generally because of rain. The intersection floods and there is no secondary way out. As part of the staff report, there should have been a hydrology report which I know it has not been included. Furthermore, they do not have any legal access to the property. I went and contacted the County, and they show that the road north of Vivienda, which is Terrace Road and has been in the railroad right of way since 1915. Your conditioning of them to connect to that road is trespassing. That road was granted to the Merriman's in 1915 by the railroad and is about 1,000 feet long and goes all the way into Colton before La Cadena was even built. Secondly, when you have a truck that is 9 1/2 feet wide with a road that is 18 feet wide, that puts that truck over the center line and you can't pass. And the traffic report mentioned in there says that an average daily trip would be 29 trips, that's one in every 15-20 minutes for the working day either way. We were conditioned to put in street improvements on Vivienda and there was a mentioned with regard to a ledge right below the roadway and this used to be access to Vivienda, you can see the dirt road that remains. The staff needs to do a more complete report for this project. The City Engineer needs to become more involved in this project. 10 Vice Chair Addington: Thank you for,your input. Staff. I have looked at the flood control exhibit that was provided to us, the master drainage plan for this is on the east side of Rancho line which is located on the property next door for your information. Jo Stringfield,please. Jo Stringfield: "Good evening, my name.is Jo Stringfield, and I still live at 22273 Barton Road and am still a resident there. And I am still concerned about the City and what's going in. And I feel that the Manhole cover manufacturing company would not be good for those that live around the residential there, and share Bobbie Forbes concern about what's going to happen to her property and the others properties, just look and see what has happened to my property and along Barton Road. You can come in and follow procedure to 'change zoning, but it can still happen so it's a real concern for them to.not want a manufacturing company and not-want all the pollution and trucks; it is a worry. Just look at Barton Road 'with all the trucks that go up and down let alone on little streets, and I just wanted to voice my concern for them too. Thank you. \ Vice Chair Addington: Thank you very much, I g Y ry appreciate it. At this point, we've gone through almost all of the request to speak forms. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak at this time and present new information that hasn't already been presented tonight, if so, please come up to the podium. Warner Hodgden: Thank you Mr.- Chairman, my name is Warner Hodgden and I represent La Sierra Holding Company. We will be at the 50 acres immediately to the south'contiguous to this property-and recently bought on January 27th of this year. We are positive people, we have met with staff and Mr. 'Koontz starting back in December and I have recently talked with Jeff and considered them to be very professional persons. I have read this report this week and would like to address the following issues and specifically I have talked to Jeff, and I am saying Jeff not because I am familiar with him but because I cannot remember his last name. I noticed from your traffic engineer that it states that Jerry Glander the Director of Building and �_. Safety informed me that to do future work, that is contemplated that the condition of the paving is not necessary:because of contemplated new roads in the future and I would like to know what exactly those are, because I don't know anything about them. In relative to the easement, I understand that one of the conditions of the applicant is that they dedicate approximately 30 feet on the north. That would mean we would dedicate 30 feet on the north of that to make a 60 foot right of way, I do not know what the curb separation are, but I did bring up to Jeff earlier,and I believe I am correct but could stand to be wrong. I have had my engineer look at it and ] looked at it onsite myself, I believe major power lines are right on the line and would- end up right in the middle in the sixty foot street and are almost prohibitive in relative to cost to relocate them. I, can see that possibly if the applicant would consider a 60 foot dedication, we would immediately enter into an agreement with the City and the applicant to go ahead and pave our half of the road clear on out to Terrace Road. Vice Chair Addington: Just for clarification, Sir, your property is due north of this? Warner Hodgeson: Yes. In continuance to what they referred to west of Terrace Road. In all fairness to the existing property owners who are still there that are non-compliant owners, I talked to Mrs. Rich who has lived there for,forty years, I am familiar with that property immediately contiguous with the Riverside Canal etcetera, and doing the transaction over forty years ago when I was building the Bluffs Restaurant and Dunn Edward's Paint store and so on ,ar]d working with the City of Riverside and the La Sierra Water Company at that particular time. I am here representing my two Sons. 11 I In conclusion, I also noticed that the area is on a septic tank. I realized that the temporary standpoint that they.might use the existing septic system, but I am assuming that this area is surrounded by sewer lines and the closest one being on Terrace Avenue that the improvements should be put in to that street at this time and the sewer and water mains extended. We would like to participate and start off on the right foot. I admire what I read about this family who has been in business together as brother and sisters, etcetera for twenty five years, and I know what I it is like to work hard and start and I do not quarrel with the staff report cause I do not know much about it, but I do know about access,and I am unaware of any new improvements that are going in and we will try to expedite them as soon as possible and including addressing the underpass out to La Cadenda Avenue under the railroad. The previous gentleman had mentioned that it was not a dedicated right of way and I would like to correct him because I am 1 intricately aware of that 1915 dedication by the railroad was to'the County of San Bernardino for that access and they gave up the existing access and the avenue at that time and .across -railroad track on to La Cadena, it is our, intent in cooperating with the City of Colton wl i happens to be incidentally, their line is west of the underpass and the actual underpass is in Grand Terrace. i I realize that the area does flood, and the recent construction by the San Bernardino County Flood Control i.e., their parks division of the trail there put a balk head across that area to accommodate the trail and further impact it and blocked off the dam. Thank you for your time have taken up more than three minutes but I am intricately in the knowledge of the area and i have been because my family has the largest investment and we intend to go forward. The most recent project that I have completed was the. Ashley Furniture project located at Cooley Ranch. It was about an 80 Million Dollar project with nothing but the highest quality for 29 acres that we do have zoned into the City of Grand Terrace. Thank you very much. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you very much Sir. Would anyone like to address the Commission I at this time? Hello my name is Juanita Ogden, I recently purchased a home at 21811 Vivienda Avenue. My Mother lives on Maple, which is the same area that I had purchased a home near where I was j raised, and I thought that it would be a great idea to live by my Mom where my kids can ride their bikes and they could go to Grandma's nice and safe. When I was in that area- growing up, I didn't have to wear a helmet, and now I understand why kids have to wear helmets. i , I would hate to see in the future if this production company goes through where my kids mistakenly trying to get to their Grandma's house just riding their bikes by a big truck in that area. And I really hope that a homeowner and a Mother of three young children in the area, that this does not have to happen, and I think this whole thing is unacceptable, and it is not the right thing to do. Thank you. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you. Would anyone else like to address the Commission? My name is Jennifer Kados, I live at 21815 Vivienda Avenue. I get deliveries from Fed Ex, UPS, and pizza for residents that live below me. Across the street to get my mail, I am almost hit daily by people whether they are residents, police, or commercial vehicles that was my concern. ! Someone mentioned earlier about putting in signs and speed bumps, I think that's a good idea. Thank you. Good Evening, my name is Larvin Houston and I own the property there on Maple between Walnut and Vivienda at 21600 Walnut. There was one question to ask why the applicant's address shows,up as Vivienda, it's because that's where the water meter is. We have a water 12 meter on the property on Maple, it goes to Vivienda. At the last meeting we had here, I had the property in escrow, and it fell out because of our nice lovely neighborhood. We had the opportunity to have Terrace Road .improved with curb and gutter all the way down to Vivienda. We had the opportunity to have Walnut done as well, but the question about coming up Terrace Road and making a left onto Walnut, you cannot do: that in, a,big truck, it has to go out onto Barton Road. Should they come in from that way;, they cannot get out. I am sorry that these people have got homes in an industrial area between two railroad tracks. I feel for them, but they are talking about losing property value.. I have gained .quite a bit of property value on my property. My intentions were to build on that property, and I think that we had everything basically done. One of the reasons why I backed off is because my office that we were putting was better than any house on Maple Street. I was over building and that is why we didn't put an office there. Most of the people that are here tonight shouldn't be involved in this thing. I realized that this is their neighborhood, but the people on the back side of Vivienda are the only ones that have a concern with this. The applicant has more money invested in their property than the entire residential area. My name is Mike Simon, and I live at 21797 Vivienda Avenue. In remarks to Mr. Twisted Sister here. Vice Chair Addington: Let's keep everything professional please. Mike Simon: I'm sorry, I forgot his name. That area was not originally commercial. It was originally agricultural. I don't know what you guys did to change it to agricultural, and I'm not saying that it was the people that are on the Commission right now, I know it was done years ago. I would like to see proof that they did everything legal to change it. I don't think it was done legally or morally and I would like to see it reversed. My name is Virginia Hernandez and I live at 11858 Maple Avenue and have lived there over 38 years and raised 6 children. A is a beautiful neighborhood to have my children grow up in. I work Stater Bros. warehouse for 27,years and am now retired. It's a shame that one person can come out and blow the whole thing away. I love Grand Terrace, I raised my children there and could put up with the plane visits, have.a good relationship with the plumbers across the street from me, I have. no problems. When I hear about this situation of this thing brought down because it's in the General Plan, because the City of Grand Terrace has-this all laid all laid out already, when I moved there, across the street was agriculture. Down the hill on Vivienda and on Terrace Avenue, it was all agricultural ranches and horses. Now it's all going down the tubes. My name is Shauna Padilla and I live at 21797 Vivienda.. I wanted to talk about the fire department. They will not be able to find those houses. The only way that they,find those houses is because of the residents along that ridge stop the fire trucks. Whenever you see a fire truck go by three or four times, you have to go.out there and ask what they are trying to find. We have to remind them that there are 'houses'down there, because ,they have been by within .the passed month. My name is Mario Franklin I live at 21779 Vivienda. Manhole Covers represents sewage. I live just not even 100 yards where they are going to have these manufactured. I hate the.fact that I am going to have sewage representing where I live and all the_people are here tonight.; So pretty much, I feel that this had been a injustice to all of us. I know that this is not the best side of town, but.you guys have to do us a favor and help us out. We need your help. 13 i any name is Rebecca Duran, and I live at 21899 Vivienda. I am at the corner of Vivienda and Grand Terrace Road. I just bought my home and I have a lot of traffic going through there, and across the street from me,-there is no property there. I really like it out here and my family really likes it out here, and [ know that if you were to bring a project like this I would hate to think what this will make the neighborhood where I plan to live my last days here. Vice Chair Addington: Not seeing any other takers for the public hearing-, I would like to is ask our last speaker request form to come'up. Stacey Jaureguy, would you please come up. Stacey Jaureguy: Just one,comment, I think most of the issues that have been brought up have already been addressed by the engineers and the various agencies, but just in regard to the gravel drives, gravel has to be replenished, and when people don't care about their business, they don't replenish it, so' yes, it can happen, but as I mentioned in-my statement before, have no intentions of letting our gravel decompose to the point of dust. We are going to keep our gravel roads and if we have to sign something to ensure that, we would be happen to do so in order to allay any worries of a dust condition that would happen if there is some type of an i issue like that, we don't want the dust either. So I can understand how the residents feel. Vice Chair Addington: Stacy I have a question with regard to the dust and the roads, I appreciate you sharing that the equipment that you will be providing will control the cement dust, but in regards to the roads, realistically the three inches of gravel there is going to be put down, and I'm speaking here as a civil engineer, to maintain that in a proper manner will required two repairs during the winter months. Would.you company consider paving those i drives within your property with asphalt? Stacy Jaureguy: Well, the issue is with the water quality control people. .As have mentioned in the first meeting, before we decided what our services were going to be, we checked with the State agencies and got their recommendations. We want to make sure that we confor especially to the storm water division and they preferred the impervious surface and the gravel- Cdrives because they don't want that sheeting off. i Vice Chair Addington: I understand what the water board desires. I have to do these similar WQMD for my clients all the time, but on the issue of porous pavement, it is usually a hardened pavement that has to be'swept and maintained usually on a monthly basis. To try and maintain and-sweep your-porous pavement, you can't because it is strictly gravel. That's why I am asking if you would consider the AC Pavement. The issue for water quality board is you have lots of open area out there as long as your lime is not getting into the soil and your lime is staying in your cement batch plant, you should be fine. The rest of it should be draining off into green spaces. So there's really not a conflict in here any more, and I really don't think that the water quality control board in the request for porous pavement is going to be a deciding factor for any votes by this Commission. My issue on this one is the dust. Your machinery and permits have covered that issue. The dirt roads are going to, be a major dust issue out there, year round including winter. That is why I am asking would your company be willing to pave the interior of i your project. Not all of the storage yards, I am asking for the-drives. ' Stacy Jaureguy: And what are you stipulating is the drives specifically so it is clear. i - Vice Chair Addington: Everywhere where you're going to put three inches of gravel where you're going to drive your vehicles. i Stacy Jaureguy: I don't think I can make that decision, I would have to consult with the owners to be able to make that decision. 'I don't see why the gravel would be sufficient if it is well 14 maintained. While the dust is going to. settle on .'the surface, it's going to settle on any surface, whether it's concrete or it's the gravel, and the wter is going to be able to allow that dust to go down to the gravel, so we feel that it is reasonable and it has been well thought out, and we hope that the Commission would uphold the 'choice that we made,. but in order to make that decision., I would have to consult with the owners, because it would also be an economical pattern. Vice Chair Addington: Alright we appreciate that. Are there any other questions of the applicant. Thank-you very much. At this point we will go ahead and close the public hearing. We do have some questions of staff. An issue was brought up with regard to neighborhood signage. What is involved in putting signs out there for no trucks. Planning Director Koontz: Anything like that has to be made as a request to the City Council. They would have to take an action on it. Vice Chair Addington: Another issue was brought up with regard to new roads in the area, can you address that. Planning Technician Gollihar: Jerry Glander basically said that future projects will be .developed to the west and to 'the north and will be required .to widen the roads which would be a requirement of building and safety. ;The current proposed project has been required to pave the property with aggregate base, slag or ground ac pavement. Vice Chair Addington: the entire property or only the drives? Planning Technician Gollihar: All of the drives and the access points. Vice Chair Addington: and the third issue that was brought was sewer. Is there sewer in the area? Planning Director Koontz: I believe there is a sewer line that goes along,Grand Terrace Road. Planning Technician Gollihar: I believe that there is also a sewer line in the access easement. It was not addressed by the building and safety department because of the size of the project and property. Building .and Safety Department said it was not necessary to put it on sewer but it could be installed at a later date as long as-the. lot is over an acre; it.was not required to be connected. Vice Chair Addington: Any other questions of Staff? Commissioner Comstock: Yes, I have a couple of questions. As an ex-parte communication, Jeffrey McConnell came to my home to drop off a CD with pictures. I was not at the last Planning Commission meeting, so I am busy trying to catch myself up here with all of the information. The storm drain that appears here from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District which runs through this property, or close to it, how deep is that? Vice Chair Addington: If you had that to me I will be able to decipher it for you. The plan view is showing this as a trapezoidal channel with a bottom width of 10 feet, depth in three feet and side slopes 1 1/2:1 feet. The profile view is showing the same thing,'so it would be an open channel. 15 i Commissioner Comstock: With all of the problems that we have had about the suggesting about the mail address being on Vivienda, what kind of ball of wax or bees nest would we be in to try to get an address change down along Terrace Road there. Planning Director Koontz: Building and Safety issues the street addresses, so we would have to sit down with Jerry (Glander) and figure out how we could handle that issue. I am sure that there is some way that we could work out that issue. i Commissioner Comstock: It seems to me that it would clear up a lot of the issues about traffic coming through the neighborhood and if they were to have a separate address away from the residential neighborhood on a separate street, I would be in favor of having that condition to the project. Planning Technician Gollihar: The applicant did request that I speak to Jerry Glander, and said basically until that road is a dedicated road, that there is no way to give ingress and egress to Vivienda because that is where the dedicated road is. I asked if it were possible to name a private drive, but Jerry Glander said that a private drive is not on a public map. Mr. Glander also added that until we develop the entire area, a private road would create the same problem. Commissioner Comstock: That brings up another question that I have regarding the easement that has been donated or dedicated for the segment of the road and correct me if I am wrong, but did I hear you say that we're going to have a three inch gravel base for a road? Planning Technician Gollihar: Due to the fact that it is still considered a private drive, and proposed future development will eventually be introduced, the traffic engineer did not find it necessary to develop at this time only to have to tear it down in a short period of time. Commissioner Comstock: I guess my question is will we require other property owners dedicate and pave that road, why are we not doing that on this one? Planning Technician Gollihar: There will be a small portion that will be dedicated for the concern of water quality. A small portion will be dedicated for future development and they will be required to improve their portion of the road when the other properties develop. Otherwise, there would be a small portion of road developed with no access to it with a performance bond. Commissioner Comstock: Also, several of the comments that came up-from the public regarding inspections to make sure that they are in compliance with air quality and ground water quality drainage. Can I just have you tell me so that the public can hear what are the options so that someone who doesn't know, do they call the City on that or do they call AQMD. Who do they call if they have some plights regarding those issues. Planning Technician Gollihar: The residents would then call the Water Quality Control Board with their concerns with regard to water quality and the Air Quality Management District with air quality concerns. Both agencies are fairly prompt and have the proper equipment to check and to make sure things are taken care of. Planning Director Koontz: Or they would call City of Grand Terrace Code Enforcement and we would call out to other Code Enforcement agencies. Commissioner Comstock: Would that be a first call, or would we call the air quality control? 16 Planning Director Koontz: There is two approaches, directly calling the State agencies and reporting these 'kind of issues or calling Code Enforcement. Our Code Enforcement officer would go and investigate the situation. And if necessary, they would call air quality agencies to get some assistance. Commissioner Comstock: Just by way of a comment, it appears to me that this company is trying to be as conscientious of being a good neighbor as they can. They are trying to take care of all of these issues so I am looking at this and thinking that the residential neighbors would call the company and say they are having some problems with dust blowing up or something and nothing is done,, it seems to me that they need to be able to do something about it if they can't get any satisfaction by the company directly. That's all,of my questions. Thank you. Commissioner Bidney: An issue has just arisen in relationship to the dedication of the easement t that fronts this five acres of property. The other 30 feet that would be dedicated to the north has a power line on it evidently. Which means that there isn't going to be a 60 foot street there in the future. Everything that we are talking about tonight is in the future. All of this is taken care of in future, and I don't believe too much in the future because they ,don't have it the way we think they should have,it. So I have a very tough time. I'm on this Commission because I have been appointed by the City Council to protect-the City of Grand Terrace. I am,not against it. I am strictly 100% for private property,, and people doing what the zoning 'requirements are and everything, but there are certain issues here where I have a hard time convincing myself that this is the right project at this time to continue.,It seems to me that there are a lot of issues that have to be addressed. With good conscience, I cannot go any further,on this' until a lot of stuff is put together. Thinking of-things that are going to happen in the future doesn't please me as a Commissioner protecting the City of Grand Terrace and it's residents. have heard the Adventures Center Project, and the motor'home project, and all of this is for the good of the City of Grand Terrace. We all have our idiosyncrasies where we want certain things done but my position here is to do what I think is right for the City of Grand Terrace and I don't think that this is right at this time. Vice Chair Addington: Bob, I agree with you that this needs to be a stand alone project and no one has ever presented anything to this Commission as to what could be going out additional industrial development in the future. I had brought up about six issues at the last meeting, and feel that five of the six issues have been addressed. Some that everyone in this room needs to consider is the proposal that's going in, this Manhole, Builders; it meets the zoning and .is a non conforming use. In that respect, they are entitled to that use of this property. Commissioner Bidney: That may be true but I am hearing at the same time we have a traffic control problem. Who is going to enforce all of these trucks going into Terrace Road and going over and Vivienda, Walnut, Burns and coming out on the other side. It's going to- take money from the City of Grand Terrace. All of these people work and are raising families, they are going to have to call the Sheriffs Department. I don't feel comfortable with that. Vice Chair Addington: You bring up a good point. The applicant tonight did note that they are planning on handling the traffic for their business, and looking at it and how they described it sounded very reasonable. As far as enforcing of it, all commercial vehicles are allowed in residential neighborhoods. The one thing that we would have to do is look at the signage program to prohibit those types of commercial trucks in that neighborhood. But I did like that fact that the applicant is willing to re-direct their own trucks away from the residential neighborhoods. 17 Commissioner Bidney: That will happen for a time, and then other development will come in to, the area, and there will be more trucks, and we don't have any infrastructure to take care of that. I don't know if the City of Grand Terrace will be doing anything on the west side of the freeway. j So 1 don't know what they-are going to do over there now. I do not see any money allocated for any of this. I truthfully cannot go along with this. I am sorry. Commissioner Comstock: Looking at that electrical transmission line, whatever it is, and thinking about, I know we have several parcels in that area zoned M2 and thinking of one of the comments about doing some sort of master plan to make sure that we have our infrastructure taken care of properly, has staff had any discussion of doing some sort of master plan for that area.? Planning Director Koontz: That item was brought up a couple of meetings ago at a City COL--:I meeting where someone from the general public had asked if a master plan was being preps .for that area. What the City Council was proposing to do., well, they have not told me. Commissioner Comstock: Regarding this electrical transmission line and I'm not familiar with i the area, I have driven down there several times, but as it was mentioned, I am just not seeing it for some reason. Maybe we ought to move to continue this meeting for another month to check i out this area. If we are going to have a street dedicated and not be able to build the other half of j the street to me it doesn't seem like it's accomplishing much. Planning Director Koontz: In response to that, why don't we call ,up Mr. Hodgeden, "since he is the owner of the adjacent property and has proposed this issues and ask him what he would do with this and what his up front commitment would be to it. Vice Chair Addington: Mr. Hodgeden would you approach the podium? (Vice Chair re-opened the public hearing). I Warner Hodgeden: I thought that I had made myself clear when I 'was trying to impress everything into a short presentation. We want to be positive and what I was trying to do is bring a positive light that the power line would be addressed because it's in everybody's best interest, and I'm not speaking selfishly, but in my-experience in development all of my life. I think that it should be addressed on the power lines, and we would be willing to go into an agreement, i.e. the City of Grand Terrace and the Applicant as quickly as possible to dedicate all our side of the road out to Terrace Road and put in our improvements, etcetera; I am just guessing probably 700 feet and including a cul-de-sac as it ends so that it is properly addressed for the existing residential. People that are non-conforming it makes good fire access for them, and gets all of the sewer, sewer, water, lighting and landscaping in. We would be more than willing to do that and cooperate With the applicant and even go so far as -to trying to talk with the landscape contractor, in which he has bought the other property at Vivienda and Grand Terrace Road to go into agreement with them as well. We're positive in anything that you want to.do. Commissioner Comstock: I'm fishing for information here, but that power pole transmission line, is that smack dab in the middle between your property line and the applicant's property line? Warner Hodgeden: I believe that it is and I've looked at the last stake, 1 believe for the corner that, I believe that is the applicant's and not ours because we have surveyed the area, and have done all of the topography on the entire 50 acres and have done all of the soils tests for liquefaction and so on to build a building. Our entire site is- power lines, and it would have an additional 30 feet on their side. With the exception we'll dedicated anything that we can. We're not saying dedicate it over that way and get out of paying for half. We will pay-for our half and 18 i work with anybody to get the total improvements done. By the time they do the engineering and go through the process, it will toke a year to do that, and in the meantime, we will-also be trying .to submit our plans to the City for the full improvements of Terrace Avenue, and do the underpass. Vice Chair Addington: So you're proposing a development of your 50 acres then? Warner ,Hod eden: Yes, we are g going to go forward, we just, haven't had it very long. I discussed the jest of things in general, with Mr. Koontz, and was probably 30 days off on giving the general concept._ We're going to go as fast we can. on the full improvements as I have. previously explained which 1,think is a positive for everybody. Fire protection, primary and secondary access and we're even going,on with the topo clear on up to the Stater Bros. corner which is Walnut with curb and. gutter from Barton, Road to Walnut so that we. can 'do the conceptual engineering plans to know what it takes and the grades for the extension of that street. In looking at the corner of Barton. Road and, into Where it goes westerly to La Cadena which is just aboutto be signalized. Vice Chair Addington: Thank you. I appreciate your input. Stacey Jaureguy: I Would like to know if it's possible instead of it being a continuance over this issue, if it can be a condition for approval that there be enough room for the agency to prove the size of the street that they needed in order to have.access in and out, rather than continuing it to another month. Commissioner Comstock: I don't know if we are.prepared at this time to be able to define the condition for approval. I would not be prepared to be able to find a condition for approval. I am not against the project, but I am in favor of common sense and trying to develop with, common sense, and it doesn't make sense to be able to approve a project where we wouldn't be able to install a street because of a power pole, or transmission line or whatever it may be that's standing right in the middle of the road. Stacy Jaureguy: But just like all those other conditions, those have to be met or the project cannot go through. Vice Chair Addington: Yes. You are correct. Please limit your comments to three minutes and please provide new information only. Okay,. my name is Rich and I live down there at the bottom facing that property I have- been there for forty years, my address is 11701 Terrace Avenue, the only address on Terrace Avenue. My front door faces-that property and we've. always had horses down there and, it's been a nice place to live. My front door is about 40 feet from their property line. How would you like .to have something like that in your front yard? Would you like that if you have been there forty years where it's been agriculturally zoned and now all of a sudden, somebody like you has pulled the agricultural zoning off of there. I am a civil engineer myself. I retired fourteen years ago and worked for the County of San Bernardino, and I've built roads and bridges in San Bernardino County. I'm telling you that they are not putting that business in my front yard, and you can take it or leave it, I' don't care how you look at it, but they are not going to do it.. And I know the same as you are, and I don't know who you dre or who is paying you off, but you're not' putting that in my front yard. r Vice Chair Addington: Thank you for your comments. At this point we will go ahead and close the public hearing. Do you' have any other questions for Staff? Commissioner Comstock, 19 concerning the power lines, roads can always be built around power lines. One of the things that the applicant has offered and the way I heard is that they are willing to dedicate the 60 feet on their property. That is one way around the power line. If that occurs whenever the next business comes in which is adjacent, they would have to dedicate the 60 feet at that point also. I still have a concern with the air quality management issues, so at this point I would like to make a couple of motions here. The first motion I would like to make is the applicant go ahead and f dedicate the property as required by the City Staff for the future road even if that is greater than 30 feet. j MOTION PC-23-2005: Motion was made by Vice Chair Addington to require that the Applicant dedicate the property as required by the City Staff for the future road even if that is'greater than 30 feet. Commissioner Comstock seconded the motion. MOTION VOTE PC-23-2005: Approved 2-1-2-0 Commissioner Bidney voting No Chair Wilson Absent Commissioner Whitley Absent i i MOTION PC-24-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to re-word Condition Five to remove the three options of aggregate base, slag base or asphalt grindings and replace it with asphalt driveways capable of H2O Loading. Commissioner Comstock seconded the motion MOTION VOTE PC-24-2005: Approved 2-1-2-0 Commissioner Bidney voting No Chair Wilson Absent ! Commissioner Whitley Absent i MOTION PC-25-2006: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to approve SA-05-06 and E705-04 with the added Conditions. Commissioner Comstock seconded the motion. MOTION VOTE PC-25-2005: Approved 2-1-2-0 Commissioner Bidney voting No C Chair Wilson Absent i Commissioner Whitley Absent 3. SA-05-10, E-05-05 CUP-05-05: Construct an approximately 3,000 square foot, fast food Mexican restaurant with a drive-thru and outside patio eating i ;area. i 20 � I j Planning Director Koontz replied that they are currently in plan check. • Information from Commissioners None ADJOURN PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION 9:40 PM NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 21 2005 Respectfully Submitted, Approved By, v , Gary K-6ontz, PI ning Director at w Addi ton, ice Chairman Pla ning Co mission i 27 I Community and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA AGENDA THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION f OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WILL BE HELD ON ! DATE: June 16, 2005 i F PLACE: Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 7:00 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING • Call to Order t i • Pledge of Allegiance, • Roll Call Public address to, Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community and i Economic Development. ` PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: • This is a time for anyone in the audience to speak on any item, which is not on the agenda for this meeting. ITEMS: i 1. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 19, 2005 RECOMMENDATION: Approval i Attachment I 22795 Barton Road ® Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 f - i i 2. SA-05-06 E-05-04. Continuation of the project that will consist-of a conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion of/ an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: 21712 Vivienda Avenue, Assessor's Parcel Number.0275-191-02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and approve SA-05-06 and E-05-04 with conditions. 3. SA-05-10, E-05-05 CUP-05-05: Construct an approximately 3,000 square foot, fast food Mexican restaurant with a drive-thru and outside patio eating area. APPLICANT: SDG Investments LOCATION: 22193 - 22237 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (A rectangular shaped parcel of about .6 of an acre located on the_ south side of Barton Road about 750 feet easterly of Michigan Street. The proposed site has a depth of 108 feet and a width of 262 feet.) RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive the staff report and testimony, close the hearing and approve the Resolution calling for the approval of SA-05-10, CUP-05-05 and E-05-15 based on the findings in the Resolution of Approval and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. - 4. SA-05-09, E-05-14: Applications for a Site and Architectural and Environmental Review to construct a 1,339 square foot room addition to an existing 1,931 square foot, single story residence on a 10,804 square foot lot located in the R1-7.2 Zone (Single Family Residential minimum 7,200 square feet). APPLICANT: Garrett Montoya LOCATION: 22777 Fairburn in the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing and approve SA-05-09 and E-05-14 with conditions. 2 I ADJOURN SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CONVENE PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION I • Information to Commissioners Town Square Project • Information from Commissioners i ADJOURN PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION I NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 21, 2005 I j I I i + I I , I i 3 v I , , Community and-Economic Development CALIFORNIA Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION (909) 824-6621 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING May 19, 2005 The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Planning Commission was called to order at the Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California, on May 19, 2005, at 7:05 P.m., by Chairperson Doug Wilson PRESENT: Doug Wilson, Chairperson Matthew Addington, Vice Chairperson Brian Whitley, Commissioner Robert Bidney, Commissioner Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Lampe, Associate Planner Michelle Boustedt, Planning Secretary ABSENT: Tom Comstock, Commissioner 7:05 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING • Pledge of Allegiance led by Vice Chair Addington • Roll Call PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: NONE ITEMS: - 1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2005 MOTION PC-17-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to approve the minutes of April 21, 2005 MOTION VOTE Commissioner Whitley Seconded the motion PC-17-2005: Approved 3-0-1-1 Chair Wilson Abstained Commissioner Comstock Absent 1 Item 1 MOTION PC-20-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to approve SA-05-05, E-05-03 and CUP-05-02. Commissioner Sidney seconded the motion MOTION VOTE PC-20-2005: 4-0-1-0 Commissioner Comstock Absent 5. SA-05-06, E-05-04: The conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion of i existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. i I APPLICANT: Manhole Builders i i LOCATION: 21712 Vivienda Avenue, Assessor's Parcel Number 0275-191- j 02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive testimony, close the Public I Hearing, and approve SA-05-06 and E-05-04 with Conditions. Prior to Planning Technician Gollihar's presentation, Vice Chair Addington reported -- exparte communication. . Vice Chair Addington reported that Jeffrey McConnell had co. to his residence to share a few items of concern with regard to the project. A minor concern was with regard to the project being built upon a flood plain.. A major concern was the project is being constructed near a residential area, and the possibilities of commercial vehicles traveling through the residential neighborhood. Commissioner Whitley reported that Mr. McConnell also came to his residence and the i conversation was along the same lines as the conversation of he and Commissioner ! Addington. Commissioner Bidney also reported that Mr. McConnell also works at Terra Loma Real Estate where Mr. Bidney is currently employed and Mr. McConnell took Commissioner Bidney for a drive around all of the streets around the proposed area. i Planning Technician Gollihar greeted the Commission and presented the Staff report. The request is for a Site and Architectural review to convert an existing single story home consisting of 1,350 square feet into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage f and various other outbuildings into 3,500 square feet of material storage buildings. The site and surrounding area is zoned residential as well as Industrial M2. The present site is a-non conforming use, which is a residence on an industrial location. The properties to the north, east, west and southwest are also Zoned M2 Industrial. Properties further to the east are Zoned R2 Low Medium Density Residential. The properties directly to the ! south of the project are Zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential with an Agricultural Overlay. 9 j The request to convert the existing single family home and a construction yard are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code. The general layout shows that that is a steep.cliff at the edge of the bluff where the single family residences are located. A site plan has been submitted that shows where the production areas and storage areas as well as the parking areas. A fence has been proposed to separate the storage area from the driveway and parking area of the applicant. Presently, there are no easements placed on the subject site. There is an easement on a northerly property for a non conforming residence and have created an access road on the easement. The easement is 420 feet from the subject site. A landscape plans has been proposed consisting of many trees. As well as various bushes and plants to screen the residences located on the properties on either side of the site. Some trees have been proposed- to be moved from the production area and relocated to screen the site from the surrounding residences. A condition has been added that since the main access road will be utilized by the applicant, the building and safety department has modified their conditions to include a dedicate a 30 foot portion of the road to create a public road from Terrace Avenue to a portion of the applicant's.property. The Applicant has been advised that several citizens have voiced concern with regard to a truck route. At this time, there are trucks that end up getting lost and travel through the residential area, in which some of the residents have had to guide trucks away and out of the neighborhood. The Applicant has been advised that all of their commercial vehicles must travel by way of Terrace Road to get to La Cadena Boulevard or to the nearby- freeways. The Applicants,have one diesel truck which will take two trips,per day. It has averaged that a total weekly trips including employees, material delivery would consist of 230. The Traffic Engineer did not require a traffic study. The Traffic Engineer did suggest that some type of paving along that access road to prevent dust and to allow for better travel. The access road to Vivienda should also be repaired. The Environmental Impact report with the Negative Declaration had some typographical errors on it, so therefore the application could not be improved at this meeting. Staff is requesting that the application be continued to allow for the Staff to be able to revisit the environmental documentation for the next regularly scheduled meeting in June. Chair Wilson opened up the item for discussion to the Commission prior to opening up the Public Hearing. Vice Chair Addington asked if the City Engineer had an opinion with regard to the two inch thick gravel base. Planning Director Koontz replied that two inch rock has been proposed and not two inch gravel. 10 Commissioner Bidney felt that the fire department should be called to make'sure that they have reviewed this project properly. The ingress and egress seems to be inadequate for the area. Commissioner Whitley asked if the traffic engineer gave any consideration for input with respect to signage of the streets. Planning Technician Gollihar stated that street signage .was not a requirement that was added, but rather the company would be responsible for improvement of the roads that they will utilize. Commissioner Bidney asked who owns the street from Vivienda down to the wash area underneath the railroad bridge. { Planning Technician Gollihar replied that it was to his understanding that there is a portion that is owned by the County of San Bernardino, and there is portion owned by the City of Colton. The City of Grand Terrace owns the portion of the road that leads from the driveway of the proposed site to Terrace Avenue passed Vivienda to Walnut. From that i point, it becomes the City of Colton's property. Chair Wilson opened up the Public Hearing. Stacey Jaureguy-Applicant 5021 Stone Avenue-Riverside i Ms. Jaureguy greeted the Commission and is in agreement with regard to Continuing the f application for the next meeting. i i Vice Chair Addington asked how much noise will the concrete mixer generate. Ms. Jaureguy replied that a decibel reading has been requested from the manufacturer. The manufacturer informed her that the mixer noise would be less than a diesel truck engine type of noise. i Chair Wilson asked why rock was going to be used rather than concrete for the drive areas of the site. Ms. Jaureguy replied that the Storm Water Division's preference was for a non impervious surface due to water-filtering into the ground rather than the water sheeting off of the property onto other portions of the area. The rock that is being proposed is for 2 inches of 3 114 inch rock. Ms. Jaureguy also replied that permit numbers have been issued with regard to operation of the equipment. Bobbie Forbes 11850 Burns Avenue Ms. Forbes read a letter that voiced her opinion with regard to the project. Ms. Forbes is aware that the area will develop in the future, but would like for the area to develop in a way that will be agreeable with the neighboring residences. Ms. Forbes also feels that Terrace Road is presently too small for any type of commercial trucks to travel. i i 11 Jeffrey McConnell Walnut Avenue Mr.-McConnell presented a slide show of an outdoor concrete production plant in the Rialto area. The project was slightly larger than five 'acres and has been in existence for some time. The slide show depicted commercial trucks, various concrete molds, outside storage areas, and roadways. William Kaminsky 91818 Burns Avenue Mr. Kaminsky reported that the County had the area zoned as agricultural prior to its Incorporation. When the City was incorporated Mr. Kaminsky stated that if was the City's requirement to zone the area as manufacturing. Mr. Kaminsky feels that all of the streets that the project will be using are substandard. He has measured the streets in which he has found that they -measure from 18 to 22 feet in width. He also feels that a storm drain contribution will be 'required by San Bernardino County Flood Control. . Jerry Guthrie 21769 Vivienda Avenue Mr. Guthrie has lived in the area since 1964. At that time there were cattle and horse ranches in the flood plane. Mr. Guthrie reported that between 1969-1971,-the area was flooded from 7-8 feet in height. Mr. Guthrie reported that the applicant had knocked on his door the night prior to the meeting, and stated that the applicant would have two trucks leaving in the morning, and two more trucks leaving in the afternoon. Mr. Guthrie also feels that the noise from the mixer will be too much of a hindrance to the residences. He feels that their property values will go down considerably should the project be built. Larvin Houston Houston Harris Corp Grand Terrace Road Mr. Houston feels that the entire City of Grand Terrace was considered agricultural, but it was before the City was incorporated. Mr. Houston feels that .the project is another example of progress within the City. Mr. Houston also feels that the road does need to be improved if it is going to be used by the applicant. Mr. Houston's business was required to asphalt their parking lot, and has complied with all of the requirements of-the City. Mr. Houston has also placed 3 1/4 inch gravel in'some areas where some of the service trucks drive and the gravel have not disappeared. Jeffrey McConnell 21758 Walnut Mr. McConnell wanted to clarify the requirements of the fire department, and will they require additional fire hydrants within the area. 12 Mario Franklin 21779 Vivienda Avenue I - i Mr. Franklin purchased a home in the City of Grand Terrace six months ago. Mr. Franklin was unaware that the area would be developed into manufacturing, and does not wish to have such a view. Shauna Padilla 21797 Vivienda ! Ms. Padilla states that a neighbor of hers has a daughter that is a severe asthmatic and need hospitalization because of it. Ms. Padilla feels that the dust could be detrimental to the health of some of the residences. Chair Wilson closed the Public Hearing and brought the item back to the Commission. Vice Chair Addington asked staff to work over some conditions with the water quality and the air quality boards. The post construction best management practices also need to be worked on as well as the issue with the noise of the concrete mixer. Vice Chair Addington would also like to know what the operation hours will be and can they be governed. MOTION PC-21-2005': Vice Chair Addington made a motion to Continue SA-05-06 and E-05-04 to the June 16, 2b05 Meeting. j Commissioner Whitley seconded the motion. MOTION VOTE PC-21-2005: 4-0-1-0 Commissioner Comstock Absent I . i ADJOURN SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW ,BOARD/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 9:15 pm. f CONVENE PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION • Information to Commissioners None • Information from Commissioners Miguel's will be presented before the Planning Commission at the June, 2005 meeting. I , The condominium development at DeBerry Street is moving forward. I I i 13 i - i ADJOURN PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION 9:17 PM NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON June 16 2005 Respectfully Submitted, Approved By, 64 Gary Ko ntz, Plann' Director, ou ilsori,' t h ' man Pla ing Commission c 14 i -------------------- A Community and Economic Development (ALlfORNIA Department 2795 Barton Road G,and Terrace alifornia 92313-5295 909) 524-6621 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: Thursday, June 16, 2005 Continuation from May 19, 2005 SUBJECT: SA-05-06/E-05-04 applications for a Site and Architectural, and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. i APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: A 5.1 acre lot located at 21712 Vivienda Ave., Grand Terrace, CA. APN: 0275-191-02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and approve SA-05-06/E-05-04 with conditions. REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting the approval of a site and architectural review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. Section 18.63.020II of the Zoning Code requires the filing of a site and architectural review application for the development of an industrial site. i Item 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This is a continued hearing form the May 19`h 2005, meeting. At that meeting there were several concerns from the Planning Commission and area citizens. They are as follows: 1. Environmental Assessment — The attached Environmental Assessment has be revised to better reflect this project Attachment G; 2. Traffic and Road conditions — These are address by conditions 2-6 and Attachment N & O form the City Traffic Engineer; 3. Concerns about flooding — Flood Control information is listed in the SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA section of the report; as well as conditions 16 & 18 and Attachment I; 4. Concerns about Air Quality — AQMD permits have been issued, see Attachment E, and conditions 12-15; 5. Concerns about County of San Bernardino Fire Department conditions — We requested a second review by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department and new conditions are in Attachment C and Riverside Highland Water Company Attachment D; 6. Concerns about Noise—These are addressed in conditions 8-10. Also all of these concerns have been properly addressed in the Environmental Assessment for this project, see Attachment G. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The residence at 21712 Vivienda Ave., Grand Terrace, CA. is a residence that is considered to be a legal non-conforming use. The General Plan designation for this site is Industrial and the Zoning designation for this site is M2 Industrial. The properties directly to the north, east and west as well as south west are also zoned M2,Industrial. The properties farther east, are zoned R2 - Low Medium Density Residential and to the south the properties are R1-7.2- Single Family Residential. The subject site fronts on Vivienda Ave but is approximately 60' to 70' feet below the road and is only accessible by an access easement off of Terrace Ave, which is a public street.in the City of Grand Terrace. The Subject Site is approximately 1,150 feet from the Santa Ana River, but is not within the Santa Ana River right of way or easement associated with the Santa Ana River and is therefore under' the jurisdiction of the City of Grand Terrace. The Santa Ana River is a 303(d) impaired body of water (Attachment P), which will need to be considered for the Best Management Practices (BMP) for this project in its Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). San Bernardino County Flood Control Planning, through its historical flood maps, has indicated that this site has never flooded, as shown on both January and February 1969 flood maps. The floods of January and February 1969 are considered to be the worst flood years on record according to San Bernardino County Flood Control Planning Department. (Attachment P) The Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Panel 8687 Dated February 23, 2005 (revised LOMR of effective date March 18, 1996) indicates that only the northerly half of the project is considered to be in an AE 100 year flood zone. It also indicated that the southerly half, which is the portion that contains the production and office area, is no longer in a 100 year flood zone. (Attachment Q) i I ' GENRAL PLAN AND ZONING: The subject site is located in the Industrial category of the General Plan and is zoned M2 Industrial. The requested use to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home into an office and contractors storage yard at this location is consistent with both the City's General Plan I and Zoning Ordinance. I The surrounding area is also located in the Industrial category of the General Plan and is also zoned M2 Industrial with a small section zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential in a "LDR" category of the General Plan. i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Plan: The site plan consists of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home, to be converted into an office. The existing barn, garage and several outbuildings, approximately 3,500 square feet, will be converted into material storage. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. (Exhibit 1.0) I Floor Plans: The proposed office conversion will consist of four offices, a waiting area, two restrooms, a break area and office storage. The storage buildings will remain in their present configuration. (Exhibit 2.0) jLandscape Plan: The landscape plans show the existing trees to remain and some trees which may be removed. It j also indicates the perimeter screening landscape. In addition to this landscape planters will be required for the parking area. (Exhibit 3.0) Preliminary Drainage Plan: This lot sheet flow downward from south to north as shown on the SWPPP Plan. (Exhibit 4.0 & 5.0) J Elevations: The elevations of the buildings will remain unchanged and are exhibited by existing photos. (Exhibit Photos Pages 1-9) REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: i The following comments were reviewed by various local agencies with regard to this project: Building and Safety: Please refer to the comments made by the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in his memorandum of May 19, 2005 (Attachment B). County of San Bernardino, Fire Department Community Safety Division: Additional conditions and fees may be imposed by the County of San Bernardino, Fire Department at the time of the plan check. Presently there are no comments as indicated by letter dated May 27, 2005(Attachment C). Riverside Highland Water Company Please refer to the comments made by Riverside Highland Water Company in their comments dated June 7, 2005 (Attachment D). South Coast Air Quality Management: Please refer to the comments made by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in their memorandum dated April 20, 2005(Attachment E). City Traffic Engineer: Please refer to the comments made by the City Traffic Engineer in his memorandum dated May 16, 2005 and May 19, 2005 (Attachment N& O). TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: The proposed project is subject to the Circulation Improvement Fee Ordinance No. 190 adopted by the City Council on 2/24/2000. Both a Signal Improvement Fee and a Circulation Improvement Fee will have to be paid before the building permit will be issued. r ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project to convert an existing residence into an office in an industrial zone qualified for a Negative Declaration under the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the Negative Declaration and the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist with the mandatory findings of no impact for this project are attached hereto as Attachment F & G. FINDINGS: Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that the following findings be made by the Site and Architectural Review Board in approving this application: 1. The proposed project to convert an existing residence into an office is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the M2 Industrial zoning and the provisions of the City's General Plan, Industrial category. 2. The locations and configuration of�a11 structures associated with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures. They do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy. They do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, and they are in scale with the i townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the proposed facility will be consistent with existing development in the area and the City. In addition, the site will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with any existing development along Vivenda Ave. 3. The architectural design of structures, their materials, and colors are visually harmonious with surrounding development and natural landforms; are functional for the proposed project; and are consistent with the Industrial category and M2 Industrial zoning of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will be similar to existing materials and color styles of the existing residences in the area along Vivenda Ave. I - 4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the landscape of the area and nearby developments. The proposed landscaping of the site for this house will minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. There is some clearing of property and destruction of existing trees but no natural vegetation or excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides will occur. The natural beauty of the city is preserved. The subject site is an industrial parcel that has no natural resources. 6. The design and locations of all signs associated with this project are consistent with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. All signs will be subject to a separate review through a required and separate sign permit. 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. I UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None at this time. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission on June 16, 2005, continued from May 19, 2005. All plans will be consistent in terms of property lines, easement location and dimensions, and other measurements. Minor changes can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 2. All commercial traffic shall be directed onto Terrace Avenue and Barton Road while avoiding any traffic on Vivienda Avenue. 3. Terrace Avenue shall be repaired as directed by the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a 30-foot half-width street improvement along the northern property line and submit a bond for future improvement of the street frontage at a time when improvements are made between Terrace Avenue and the subject property. 5. All onsite driveways shall be rough graded, paved with three inch (3") of aggregate base, three inch (3") of slag base, or three inch (Y) of asphalt grindings, and then rolled. 6. The applicant shall pave the access easement with a suitable material to provide a drivable surface for project traffic. Building and Safety/Public Works Department recommended the suitable material to be one of the following: three inch (3") aggregate base, three inch(3") slag base, or three inch(3") asphalt grindings 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay Traffic Signal and Circulation fees as established by Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace. 8. The project shall comply with the provisions of the City Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. 9. All onsite and offsite equipment shall be fitted with acceptable muffler system. 10. The applicant shall provide noise buffers, as necessary, to reduce noise levels at the property line to no more than 55 decibels. 11. All structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall have acquired all necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for operation of the proposed facility. 13. The project shall provide dust control measures for all activities to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance in compliance with local and State agencies including the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 14. Dust control measures shall also be taken for all driveways and access points during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Avenue to the project site. 15. All onsite equipment will be equipped with emissions control devices acceptable to AQMD. 16. Any construction activity occurring under this permit approval shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Storm Water System Ordinance (Ordinance No. 142, Subsection 1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the Clean Water Act. This site will need a NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County and plans and will need to submit four copies of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 17. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into grading plans and to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance in compliance with local and State agencies including the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Water trucks will be available during all grading activities to control dust generation. I 18. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River, which is 303(d) impaired body of water. The WQMP shall i comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 19. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:00. a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday per Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No construction will be permitted on Sunday. 20. The project will comply with the requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 21. Prior to the storage of any combustible materials onsite, an onsite fire hydrant shall be installed as per San Bernardino County Fire Department 22. Street address shall be posted during construction and appropriate lighted address numbers shall be installed prior to final construction. 23. Pay all applicable development fees, park fees, and school impact fees. 24. The proposed landscaping shall be shown on a landscaping/irrigation plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. Said landscapinglirrigation plan shall show plant types, spacing, numbers of plants, and sizes as well as irrigation facilities. Four copies of the landscaping/irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Installation of landscaping shall occur prior to _ issuance of occupancy permit. Said plan shall include at least three Parking Lot Trees (15 gal) and low growing shrubs in a five foot wide landscape planter a minimum of 75 square feet. Perimeter planters as well as an end planter must border the parking area as i required by the City Zoning Code (18.60.040 E). 25. The applicant shall adequately screen the south and east property lines. Perimeter screening plants shall also be required for any adjacent properties to provide screening of the open storage yard. 26. Any proposed fencing for the site shall comply with all applicable requirements and regulations of the City. I 27. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Building and Safety/Public Works Department memorandum, dated May 19, 2005. 28. Comply with all conditions of the County Fire Department in their memorandum dated May 27, 2005. 29. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Riverside Highland Water Company i memorandum, dated June 7, 2005. 30. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the City Traffic Engineers memorandum, dated May 19, 2005. 31. Submit four sets of the grading and paving plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to,the issuance of grading permits. 32. Submit four sets of construction plans for the office conversion of the residence to a commercial building. 33. Submit four sets of the lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All project lighting shall be shielded from adjacent residences and shall comply with the lighting standards of the City of Grand Terrace. 34. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 35. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes. 26. All debris and weeds shall be removed and kept clear from the office and storage buildings at all times. 37. All mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and shall be screened from public view. All HVAC units shall be located in the side yard behind solid side yard fencing or in the rear yard. No roof mounted HVAC units shall be allowed. 38. This project will require a minimum of 13 parking spaces, one space being designated as a Loading Zone, on handicap space, and 11 regular parking spaces. 39. This approval shall not be deemed effective until the "Acceptance of Conditions" for Site and Architectural Review (SA) 05-06 has been signed by the applicant and returned to - the City. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends • the Grand Terrace Planning Commission make the seven findings of Zoning Code Section 18.63.060 (Site and Architectural Review, Approval Process) as shown on the attached Resolution and approve SA-05-06/E-05-04 subject to the conditions of approval. 7ff sub ted , Planning Technician Approved by, Gary L. Koontz Community Development Director i i i Attachments: 1 Attachment A: Proposed Resolution with findings and conditions of approval 1 Attachment B: Recommendations from Building and Safety/Public Works Attachment C: Letter from County of San Bernardino, Fire Department Attachment D: Letter from Riverside Highland Water Company Attachment E: Permits from South Coast Air Quality Management Attachment F: Negative Declaration Attachment G: Initial Study/Environmental for the Negative Declaration Attachment H: Water Quality Control Board Proof of Application Attachment I: Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Attachment J: Manhole Builders Brochure Attachment K: Concrete Product Information iAttachment L: Potential Production exhibits Attachment M: Letter of Intent Attachment N: City Traffic Engineer, Attachment O: City Traffic Engineer Attachment P: San Bernardino County Flood Control Planning Exhibit 1.0: Site Plan Exhibit 2.0: Floor Plans Exhibit 3.0: Landscape Plan Exhibit 4.0: Drainage/Togo Map Exhibit A: Aerial Photo Exhibit B: Assessor Parcel Map i I F I - i i I I RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING FILE NO. SA-05-06/E-05-04 APPLICATIONS FOR A SITE AND ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TO CONVERT AN EXISTING RESIDENCE INTO A COMMERCIAL OFFICE 21712 VIVIENDA AVE., GRAND TERRACE, CA. APN: 0275-191-02,IN A M2 INDUSTRIAL ZONING. WHEREAS, the applicant, Manhole Builders, applied for a Site and Architectural and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn,garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses in a M2 Industrial zone; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May 19, 2005 and continued to the date certain of June 16, 2005; WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guildlines,Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project qualified for a Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have any adverse impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No.05- 04; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, as follows: The Planning Commission, after holding a public hearing and considering the proposed Site and Architectural and Environmental Review, makes the following findings: Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that the following findings be made by the Site and Architectural Review Board in approving this application: 1. The proposed project to convert an existing residence into an office is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the M2 Industrial zoning and the provisions of the City's General Plan, Industrial category. 2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures. They do not Attachment A i I Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 2 of 6 interfere with the neighbors' privacy. They do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, and they are in scale with the townscape i and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the proposed facility j will be consistent with existing development in the area and the City.In addition,the site will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with any existing development along Vivenda Ave. 3. The architectural design of structures, their materials, and colors are visually harmonious with surrounding development and natural landforms;are functional for the proposed project; and are consistent with the Industrial category and M2 Industrial zoning of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will be similar to existing materials and color styles of the existing residences in the area along Vivenda Ave. i 4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the landscape of the area and nearby developments. The proposed landscaping of the site for this house will minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. There is some clearing of property and destruction of existing trees but no natural vegetation or excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides will occur. The natural beauty of the city is preserved. The subject site is an industrial parcel that has no natural resources. 6. The design and locations of all signs associated with this project are consistent with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. All signs will be subject to a separate review through a required and separate sign permit. This is a single family residential project which will not require any special sign permits. I 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission on June 16,2005,continued from May 19,2005. All plans will be consistent in terms of property lines-, easement location and dimensions,and other measurements. Minor changes can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. t 2. All commercial traffic shall be directed onto Terrace Avenue and Barton Road while avoiding any traffic on Vivienda Avenue. Planning Commission Resolution File No.SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 3 of 6 3. Terrace Avenue shall be repaired as directed by the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a 30-foot half-width street improvement along the northern property line and submit a bond for future improvement of the street frontage at a time when improvements are made between Terrace Avenue and the subject property. 5. All onsite driveways shall be rough graded, paved with three inch (3") of aggregate base, three inch (3") of slag base, or three inch (3") of asphalt grindings, and then rolled. 6. The applicant shall pave the access easement with a suitable material to provide a drivable surface for project traffic.Building and Safety/Public Works Department recommended the suitable material to be one of the following: three inch (3") aggregate base, three inch (3") slag base, or three inch(3") asphalt grindings 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay Traffic Signal and Circulation fees as established by Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace. 8. The project shall comply with the provisions of the City Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. 9. All onsite and offsite equipment shall be fitted with acceptable muffler system. 10. The applicant shall provide noise buffers,as necessary,to reduce noise levels at the property line to no more than 55 decibels. 11. All structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic,standards of the Uniform Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall have acquired all necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for operation of the proposed facility. 13. The project shall provide dust control measures for all activities to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance in compliance with local and State agencies including the South Coast Air Quality Management District.. 14. Dust control measures shall also be taken for all driveways and access points during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Avenue to the project site. 15. All onsite equipment will be equipped with emissions control devices acceptable to AQMD. 16. Any construction activity occurring under this permit approval shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Storm Water System Ordinance(Ordinance No. 142,Subsection 1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the Clean Water Act. This site will need a NPDES Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 4 of 6 i Permit for San Bernardino County and plans and will need to submit four copies of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 17. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into grading plans and to reduce i potential impacts to a level.of insignificance in compliance with local and State agencies including the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Water trucks will be available during all grading activities to control dust generation. 18. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed.to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River, which is 303(d) impaired body of water. The WQMP shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 19. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday I per Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No construction will be permitted on Sunday. 20. The project will comply with the requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 21. Prior to the storage of any combustible materials onsite, an onsite fire hydrant sha11 be installed as per San Bernardino County Fire Department I - 22. Street address shall be posted during construction and appropriate lighted address numbers shall be installed prior to final construction. I 23. Pay all applicable development fees,park fees, and school impact fees. 24. The proposed landscaping shall be shown on a landscaping/irrigation plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. Said landscaping/irrigation plan shall show plant types,spacing,numbers of plants,and sizes as well as irrigation facilities.Four copies of the landscaping/irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Installation of landscaping shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permit. Said plan shall include at least three Parking Lot Trees (15 gal) and low growing shrubs in a five.foot wide landscape planter a minimum of 75 square feet.Perimeter planters as well as an end planter must border the parking area as required by the City Zoning Code (18.60.040 E). 25. The applicant shall adequately screen the south and east property lines. Perimeter screening plants shall also be required for any adjacent properties to provide screening of the open storage yard. 26. Any proposed fencing for the site shall comply with all applicable requirements and regulations of the City. 27. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Building and Safety/Public Works Department memorandum, dated May 19, 2005. Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 5 of 6 28. Comply with all conditions of the County Fire Department in their memorandum dated May 27, 2005. 29. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Riverside Highland Water Company memorandum, dated June 7, 2005. 30. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the City Traffic Engineers memorandum, dated May 19, 2005. 31. Submit four sets of the grading and paving plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 32. Submit four sets of construction plans for the office conversion of the residence to a commercial building. 33. Submit four sets of the lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.All project lighting shall be shielded from adjacent residences and shall comply with the lighting standards of the City of Grand Terrace. 34. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 35. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes. 26. All debris and weeds shall be removed and kept clear from the office and storage buildings at all times. 37. All mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and shall be screened from public view. All HVAC units shall be located in the side yard behind solid side yard fencing or in the rear yard. No roof mounted HVAC units shall be allowed. 38. This project will require a minimum of 13 parking spaces, one space being designated as a Loading Zone, on handicap space, and 11 regular parking spaces. 39. This approval shall not be deemed effective until the"Acceptance of Conditions"for Site and Architectural Review(SA)05-06 has been signed by the applicant and returned to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,HEREBY APPROVES SA-05-06/E-05-04 BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS. I Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 6 of 6 i PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace California at i a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June 2005 by the following vote: f AYES: NOES: ABSENT: _ ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson, City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission I I I I I i C, 12-8.5402 MEMORANDUM p � . D GRAND 7ERRRC TO: Jeff Gollihar, Planning Technician UGH Ho�S FROM: Jerry Glander, Director of Building and Safety/Public Works DEPARTMENT OF ' BUILDING & SAFETY, DATE: May 19, 2005 (Amended) �- PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING SUBJECT: SA-05-06/E-05-04 - 21712 Vivienda Ave.-- Convert existing SFR 22795 Barton Road to office, etc. - Manhole Builders Suite B Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 After.project review and in compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Article Civic Center .III,the following recommendations should be considered as conditions for the proposed (909) 825-3825 project. Fax (909) 825-7506 1. Provide:the following: A. Title report. B. Plot plan. C. 'Plans for structures to be altered. 2. Show any recorded easements on plot plan. 3. Pay all plan check,permit&inspection fees. 4. Dedicate the northerly 30' feet of property to the City for future road and utility purposes. 5. Street improvements may be deferred by recording a "Public Improvement Deferment Agreement". 6. Pay all public works, capital improvement, maintenance, circulation and traffic improvement fees. T. All improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California Business and Professions 'Code,which shall complywith all applicable requirements ofthe 2001 California Building Code,2001 California Electrical Code,2001 California Plumbing Code, 2001 California Mechanical Code,American Disabilities Act,Title 24 California Energy Requirements, Grand Terrace Municipal Code and NPDES. 8. Trim all trees and shrubs back to edge of curb along Vivienda Avenue. Attachment B I I i EXPIRATION: MAY 2006 May 27, 2005 MANHOLE BUILDERS — 5021 STONE AVE. RIVERSIDE, CA 92509 FILE: MIS GT05/13606 LOCATION: 21712 AVE —GRAND TERRACE PROJECT TYPE: PRODUCTION & OUTDOOR STORAGE APN: 0275-191-02 SQUARE FOOTAGE: BASED ON 5,000 SQ. FEET PLANNER: JEFF GOLIHAR Dear Applicant: i With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, the San Bernardino County Fire Department requires the following fire protection measures to be provided in accordance with applicable local ordinances, codes, and/or recognized fire protection standards. The following information of this document sets forth the FIRE CONDITIONS and GUIDELINES which are applied to this project. ❑ Approved ® Approved w/conditions ❑ Not Approved I FIRE CONDITIONS: Jurisdiction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein ("Fire Department"). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department. [F-1] Additional Requirements. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other on site and off site improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. [F-1a] Water System. Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using Appendix IIIA of the Uniform Fire Code. Standard 903.1 [F-5] The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 2,000 GPM for a 2 Hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow based on 5,000 sq.ft. Structure. Attachment C r MIS GT05/13606 MAY 27, 2005 Page 2 Fire Fee. The required fire fees (currently$,'1.03.001 shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division (909) 386-8465. This fee is in addition to fire fees that are paid to the County of San Bernardino. [F-40] Building Plans. Not less then two (2) complete sets of Building Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. [F-42] Turnaround. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12 % grade and have a minimum of forty five (45) foot radius for all turns. In the FS1, FS2 or FS-3 Fire Safety Overlay District areas, there are additional requirements. Standard 902.2.1 [F-43] Water System Commercial. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of one new six (6) inch fire hydrant assembly with two (2) two and one half (2 1/2) inch and one (1) four (4) inch outlet. All fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart (as measured along vehicular travel-ways) and no more than one hundred fifty (150)feet from any portion of a structure. [F-54] Water System Certification. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the job-site. [F-57] Street Sign. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street-corner to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 [F72] Hydrant Marking. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non-paved roads exist, the blue reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three (3) feet from the hydrant and at least six (6) feet high above the adjacent road. Standard 901.4.3. [F80] Commercial Addressing. Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum six (6) inches in height and with a three quarter (3/4) inch stroke. The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or externall. Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional non- illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.- Standard 901.4.4 [F82] MIS GT05/13606 MAY 27, 2005 Page 3 Key Box. An approved Fire Department key box is required. The key box shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In commercial, industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock. Standard 902.4 [F85] j Fire Extinguishers. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and j cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire Department. [F88] Additional comments: Main drive shall be off address site. Sincerely i DOUG CRAWFORD Planning & Engineering Supervisor DC:ts I I i y�gryr «� 1450 E. Washington St. Colton, CA 92324-4696 (909) 825-4128 FAX(909)825-1715 (y C � p� ONScFVA��O.AP V V I June 7, 2005 Manhole Builders Attn: Stacey 5021 Stone Avenue Riverside, CA 92509 Dear Stacey; I am enclosing a small map showing the distance to your site from the existing water main. The Fire Marshall wants the fire hydrant to be one-hundred fifty feet from any portion of a structure. This may require that the fire hydrant be on-site with a detector check valve at the property line. I will need to meet with your engineer to work out the details. If an on-site fire hydrant is needed, there are also fees for on-site fire suppression facilities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 825-4128. Thank you. Sincerely, Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RNHIss Encl. Attachment D •y`•rrr`•r. --- - - __--_ — __ --_ -w..y.•. .ram--___ ——_-.-._— __�y�--_ ^` w r : Tq Cj i45 �t P-- ._........._.. ___......------ !: ---_.............. N _.... -T9 0 c. I 061.0112005 11:41 5515610606 MANHOLE BUILDERS HAUL Ob =" SOUTH COAST AIRCUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT page 1 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Ber, CA 91765 Permit No. F?75081 51 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE Aav 442183 This initial pennit must be renewed ANNUALLY unless the equipment,is moved,or cbanges ownership. If the billing for the annual renewal fee(Rule 301.0 is.not received by the expiration date,contact the District. Legal Owner ply ID 1,44061 or Operator. MANHOLE BUILDER.;,INC. 5021 STONE AVE RIVERSIDE,CA 92509 Equipment Location: 21712 VMENDA AVE:.GRAND TERRACE,CA 92313-4426 Equipment Description: CEMENT SILO,81-6"DIA.X 22'-0"H.,75,200 POUND CAPACITY,WITH A 4" FML PIPE,FILTER VENT WITH 12 FILTERS,A 2 M.F.SHAKER,.AND A 7 %H.P.DISCHARGE SCREW CONVEYR,0'-7"DIA.X 2V-0"L. z Conditions ]. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT S 1[ALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICA.TI,ON UNDER WHICH T IIS PERMIT IS ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW, 2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PRO.P1;:W. Y MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING -' CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. 3. TOTAL MATERIAL PROCESSED THROUGH THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 360 TONS IN ANY ONE DAY. 4. A DAILY OPERATIONAL LOG OF MATERIAL RECEIVED AND STORED SHALL BE-MAINTAINED. ALL RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT rOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND SHALT.13E MADE AVAILABLE TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST. ORIGINAL Attach meiat E j tDb/rJl1 d v v 0 11:41 771bblt7bt7tf' MANMULL bU1LLtK5 t AUL !fib { �°Y SOUTH'COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Page z 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar CA 91765 Permit No. F75081 j ` • • Raj PERMIT TO CONSTRUCTlOPERATE nm "2183 CONTINUATION OF PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE f � - 1 NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206,THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE ruNUSSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN' EXCESS OF 7I30SE ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS _ PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS O.R STATUES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. I PXECUTIVE OFFICER I , By Donis M.Bailey/SL02 4/27/2005 I ' I I i I ' i I I , I i f r I ORIGINAL J I I � I i i I I Klb/p1/LCJG� 11:41 771bGlCIbYJC DANNULt JJU1LUtK5 YHUt Y-1( C SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY.MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 1 rssa r �� 21865 East Cupley Drive; Diamond Bar,CA 91765 Permit Nu. �5079 • • PERMIT TO CONSTRUCTIOPIERATE A+`� 442181 This initial pmnit must be renewed.ANMJALL7'unless the equipment is cloyed,or cbanges ownership. If the billing for the annual renewal fee(Rule 30)...4)is not received by the expiration date,contact the District. `V% Legal Owner � (DIP � ID 144061 or Operator: MANHOLE BUILDERS,INC. 5021 STONE AVE RIVERSIDE,CA 92509 Equipment Location: 21712 VIVIENDA AV)..,GRAND TERRACE,CA 92313442G Equipment Deic4ption CONCRETE BATCR MIXER,DEL ZOTTO 2000, WrIH A ROCK AND SAND BIN, 13 CU.FT.EACH,A.10 H.P.CHAIN CONVEYOR,AND A 10 H.P.DISCHARGE AUGER,I--10"DIA.X IT-0"L. Conditions: 1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT S.UALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA AND SPF,CIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED UNL SS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW_ 2. TH1S EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPf:RLY MAINTAINED,AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. Z � '1 3. TOTAL MATERIAL PROCESSED TH1tOUGH THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 240 CUBIC YARDS IN ANY ONE DAY. 4. A DAILY OPERATIONAL LOG OF MATERIAL PROCESSED SHALL BE MAINTAINED.ALL RECORDS SHALL BE KEPI'FOR A PERIOD OF THE LAST TWO YEARS AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON.R.EQU[:ST. ORIGINAL b0t t11/LYJCI' 11:41 b71bC10bpb MANNULt bU1LLtK5 1"HUt utf SOUTH COAST'AIR OUA.ITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PaReZ 21865 East Colley Drive. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PermltNo. I F= PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE 4218 i niN gaz�e� ' I CONTINUATION Ol PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE i NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206,THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE .1.MISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE i ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTII AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE CONSIDERI?D AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR STATUES B •OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. } j EXECUTIVE OFFICER I j By Dorris M.Bailey/SL02 4/27/2005 i I , i I I • I • I I i I - I I ORIGINAL I - I I 04--,y1Z.F,9 G-y 05_ PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Document Type: ' Negative Declaration Date: April 28, 2005 Project Title: SA-05-06, and E-05-04 Project Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue (Approximately 5.04 acre parcel located on the north side of Vivienda Avenue west of Terrace Avenue. This site was a legal nonconforming residence in the past.) Description of Project: The project will consist of the conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square home into.an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. Project Proponent: Manhole Builders Lead Agency: Community Development Department, City of Grand Terrace Contact Person: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director, (909)430-2247 Public Review Period: Began: Thursday,April 28, 2005 Ended: June 16, 2005 Public Hearings/Meetings: Planning Commission —Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. Environmental Finding: Based on an Initial Study,attached hereto,prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of approving SA-05-06 and E-05-04, the said project qualifies for a Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Signature: Koontz, Community Devel pment Director Attachment F i City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-06, and Environmental Review Case No. 05-04 I 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace f Community Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gary L.Koontz,Community Development Director or Jeff Gollihar, Planner Technician (909) 430-2247 4. Project Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue (Approximately 5 acre parcel located on the north side of Vivienda Avenue west of Terrace Avenue. This site was a legal nonconforming residence in the past.) ' I 5. Project Sponsor's Name Manhole Builders I 6. General Plan Designation: Industrial i T Zoning: "M2" (Industrial) i 8. Description of Project: The proposed project is located on approximately 5 acres of industrially zoned property. It will consist of the following: Conversion of an existing single story 1,350 square foot residence into an office. ■ Conversion of an existing barn, garage, and several outbuildings totaling approximately 3,500 square feet into material storage warehouses. Improvement of approximately 70,000 square feet of the site for outdoor production and storage. ■ Improvement of a parking lot for 12 vehicles. 9. Surrounding Land Uses, General Plan Designations, and Zoning: Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North M-2 Flood Plain Industrial Vacant undeveloped South R-1 7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential East M-2 Industrial Pre-existing non-conforming residence West M-2 Industrial Vacant undeveloped I Community Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Attachment G 10. Other agencies whose approval is required(e.g.,permits,financing approval,or participation agreement) • City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety— buildingand permits; grading ■ County of San-Bernardino Fire Department and Haz Mat Division — plan check review and approval, hazardous materials business plan • South Coast Air Quality Management District- equipment operations permits; • Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Water Quality Management Plan; • Riverside Highland Water Company—water connection; • City of Grand Terrace Public Works—sewer connection Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics ❑Recreation ❑Water ❑ Utilities and Services Systems ❑Hazards ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑Air Quality ❑.Noise Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation (To be completed by the Lead Agency): ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ■ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. t ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at' least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, Community Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. i Signature Date Gary L. Koontz Commutifty Development Director Printed Name Title Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A `.`No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will. not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). I I 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If,there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, `Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a Community Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A-source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. The following environmental assessment is based upon documentation found in the City of Grand Terrace General Plan master Environmental Assessment and other public resources. Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the ❑ ❑ ❑ project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from ❑ ❑ ❑ incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ minority community)? (The site is relatively small and is vacant. It will not divide any portion of the community. ) The proposed project is designated on the City General Plan as Industrial. It is zoned M2 (Industrial). The M2 zone permits "the development ofinedium manufacturing and industrial uses and are intended to allow various manufacturing and industrial uses that operate free of overly excessive noise, dust, odor or other nuisances and yet may be objectionable to other(non-industrial) districts." Surrounding General Plan and zoning designations and existing land uses include the following: Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North M-2 Flood Plain Industrial Vacant undeveloped South R-1 7.2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential East M-2 Industrial Pre-existing non-conforming residence West M-2 Industrial Vacant undeveloped a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? The site is designated as Industrial on the City General Plan and M2 (Industrial) on the City Zoning Map. The project is industrial in nature and is therefore consistent to the General Plan and Zoning. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Community Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I I I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation i Incorporated b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? The project is consistent with the City General Plan and Zoning that have been determined to be in compliance with local agency having jurisdiction within the site. The project will be required to acquire permits or other approvals from all affected local, State, and Federal agencies having jurisdiction. Finding: No Impact. No Mitigation required. c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? Properties north,east,and west of the site are designated for future industrial development. Properties immediately south of the site are zoned for residential uses and are currently developed as single family residences. Impacts to the existing adjacent residences may occur unless adequate mitigation measures are provided. Potential impacts may include commercial traffic conflicts in residential areas, noise, dust, glare and visual impacts. I Mitigation: 1. The project shall adequately screen the south property line. 2. The project shall direct all of its commercial traffic onto Terrace Avenue and Barton Road while avoiding any traffic on Vivienda Avenue. 3. The project shall provide dust, glare, and noise controls to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance in compliance with local and State-agencies including the South Coast Air Quality 1 Management District. 4. The project shall comply with the provisions of the City Noise ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. I i d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land,uses)? The site was historically used for light agricultural purposes. It has been designated as Industrial on the City General Plan. It is not located on property designated as significant agricultural lands by the State of California. Finding: No impact. No mitigation required. Community Development Department 5 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially PotentTthan No Significant Signifificant impact Impact UnleactMitiga Incorporated e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or minority community)? The site is located on the extreme north end of the City. The immediately industrial area is surrounded by railroad line to the east and west and the Santa Ana River to the north. Development of the proposed project will not divide or disrupt an established community. Finding: No Im act. No mitigation re uired. II. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ " ❑ 0 population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ housing? The project is industrial in nature and does not involve the development of housing. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? The project is industrial and will not result-in an increase in population. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? The project is a small industrial development that will occur in an existing urban area. It will not require a major extension of infrastructure through previously undeveloped areas. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? The proposed project is located in an area designated for industrial development. The current land use is rural residential which is a pre-existing non-conforming use. The project will convert the existing onsite residence to an office. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Community Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i I ' I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ❑ ■ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking? ❑ ■ ❑ V c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic-hazard? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Landslides or mudflows? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ flErosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? li) Expansive soil? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 17 Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ i I I i Community Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated No known geological hazards exist on this site or the nearby vicinity. The closest known active fault is a branch of the San Andreas located approximately two miles northeast of the site. Four additional faults are located within 20 miles of the city limits. a) Fault rupture? The project site is not located on a designated active fault. However, the general area is -" subject to severe ground shaking in the event of a major seismic event on a regional fault. Mitigation: 1. All structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. b) Seismic ground shaking? The project site is not located on a designated active fault. However, the general area is subject to severe ground shaking in the event of a major seismic event on a regional fault. Mitigation: 1. All structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? The project site is not located in a designated liquefaction zone. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? The site is not located in area area subject to seiches tsunamis or volcanic hazards. 1 Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. e) Landslides or mudflows? This area is considered to be deep unconsolidated alluvium which is designated to be strong base. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? An insignificance level of erosion may occur from excavation, grading, or fill. Mitigation: 1. A grading permit, SWPPP and WQMP permits will be required. Finding: Less than significant and reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. g) Subsidence of the land? This area is considered to be deep unconsolidated alluvium which is designated to be strong consisting of Gravelly Loamy Sand and Coarse Sand. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. h) Expansive soil? The project site is located in an area of deep unconsolidated alluvium. Onsite soils are classified as the Tujunja Series which are gravelly loamy sands typically found on alluvial fans. These soils are considered to be suitable for the construction of urban uses and roads. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. i) Unique geologic or physical features? The project site is located on relatively flat ground. The south and east property lines lie at the foot of a 70± foot cliff. No unique geologic or physical features exist onsite. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: Community Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No i Significant Significant Significant impact ! Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated i a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ ■ ❑ e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water I movements? ■ fl Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through ❑ ❑ ❑ interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ■ g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ r h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies ! The proposed project will convert a generally undeveloped area into industrial uses. The project will include a paved access road,paved parking lots, and manufacturing and storage areas for concrete manhole structures. The site is located approximately 1,200 feet south of the Santa Ana River. All site drainage will ultimately flow to the Santa Ana River which has been designated as a 303(b) impaired body of water . The site is located within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and is subject to the requirements of the County of San Bernardino General Permit for NPDES storm water control. The site is also located with a designated FEMA Zone AE 100-year flood hazard area. Based upon historical information provided by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the subject site has not been known to have been subject to direct flooding Domestic water to the site will be provided by Riverside Highland Water Company through an existing service. Riverside Highland maintains a well at the southeast corner of the site. Correspondence from the Water Company indicated the project will not impact this well. a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR j II-1 Append B) The proposed project will result in an increase in runoff due to increase impervious surfaces onsite. All Community Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated drainage will continue to flow in a northerly direction to the Sarita Ana River. The majority of the site will be natural soils and gravel operations areas that provide a pervious surface to remain runoff. Finding: Impact less than significant. b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Although a portion of the project site is located within an existing FEMA AE zone 100-year flood plain, historical information provided by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District indicates the site has never been flooded. The project will convert existing residential and agricultural structures to office and industrial uses. No additional structures are proposed. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? The project involves the manufacture of concrete products used in the installation of manholes. Dust generated from this process could impact the Santa Ana River if allowed to drain into the river. Mitigation: 1. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a Water Quality Management Plan shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County-Flood Control District. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? The proposed project will result in an increase in runoff due to increase impervious surfaces onsite. However, this increase will be incremental and is considered insignificant. Finding: Less than significant. e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? The project does not propose any changes to existing water movements. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. Community Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis !Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation I- f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? The proposed project will use moderate quantities of groundwater for domestic uses and manufacturing purposes. All water used onsite will be provided by the Riverside Highland Water Company. Riverside Highland has provided a"will serve"letter for the project. Finding: No Impact. 'No mitigation proposed. g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? The proposed project is not anticipated to alter the direction or flow of groundwater. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. h) Impacts to groundwater quality? The project is subject to the regulations of the Santa Ana Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project will not discharge contaminants that could significantly impact groundwater quality. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. i Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? The site will be provided with water by the Riverside Highland Water Company. No groundwater will be directly drawn by the project. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation proposed. V� Air Quality. Would the proposal: i a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ existing or projected air quality violation? Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ contains an implementing action to reduce such exposure) c) ; Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ E any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the Community Development Department 11 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact -Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ proposals are included in the Element) r_ Short Tenn Development of the project will involve minor grading activities that may generate dust. The South Coast Air Quality Management District requires that all grading activities comply with District guidelines for the reduction of dust during any construction activity. This includes the use'ofbest management practices described by AQMD. Long Term The City of Grand Terrace General Plan Air Quality Element established a policy to promote industrial growth within the City to assist in balancing the jobs to housing ratio. This project will generate approximately 10 new industrial jobs for the City.' The proposed project involves the mixing of concrete for the production of manholes. This will require the storage of products such as sand and gravel onsite. Operations and storage areas will be paved with gravel. a) 'Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Short term construction activities may potentially generate dust during grading. Longterm onsite activities regarding the production of manhole products may also result in potential dust,generation through the storage and use of sand and gravel and the operation of onsite heavy equipment such as forklifts. Mitigation: 1. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into grading plans and activities_. 2. Water trucks will be available during all grading activities to control dust,generation. 3. Dust control measures shall be taken for all driveways and access points-during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Avenue to the-project site. 4. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,' the applicant shall acquire all necessary'permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for operation of the proposed facility. 5. .All onsite equipment will be equipped with emissions control devices acceptable to AQMD. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. Expose sensitive receptors to-pollutants? The City General Plan Air Quality Element defines sensitive receptors as schools, hospitals, convalescent Community Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental 1 Analysis I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated homes, and nursing homes. .The closest sensitive receptor is Grand Terrace Elementary School approximately one-half mile southeast-of the site. Local prevailing winds are in a general southwest to northeast direction away from the school. .Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Alter air movement,moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality) The proposed project is a small industrial,facility manufacturing concrete manholes. No alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature is anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. I ' } Create objectionable odors? 1 The project will manufacture concrete manhole products. No objectionable odors are anticipated from this operation. ; i - Finding:-No Impact. No mitigation required., a Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Traffic ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ i Engineering and Planning Consultant) bi Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? 1 T c, Inadequate emergency access or.access to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ ■ transportation (e.g., bus tumouts,bicycle racks)? ❑ ❑ g) { Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ ■ The proposed project will take direct access from Terrace Avenue, a partially paved street located approximately 420 feet west of the site. Terrace Avenue has a paved section of approximately 18'to 24feet and is in a partially deteriorated condition. Project vehicles will use Barton Road and Terrace Avenue as the primary site access. The intersection of Barton Road and Terrace Avenue is controlled with a stop sign on Terrace Avenue. Vivienda Avenue will be used for secondary emergency access. The project is estimated to generate the following daily one-way vehicle trips per day: ! Community Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis 1 Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Contractor trucks: 8 Heavy duty delivery trucks: 1 (3 deliveries per week) Employee vehicles: 20 a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? The project will generate approximately 29 - daily one-way vehicles trips. This volume is below a level that may be considered significant per City Traffic Engineer. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Terrace Avenue, the primary access route for the project is narrow and deteriorated in certain locations. This deterioration may result in potential driving hazards. Direct access from Terrace Avenue is taken via a generally unimproved access easement. Mitigation: 1. The applicant shall provide interim repairs to Terrace Avenue as directed by the City Traffic Engineer. 2. The applicant shall dedicate a 30-foot half-width street improvement along the northern property line and submit a bond for future improvement of the street frontage at a time when improvements are made between Terrace Avenue and the subject property. 3. The applicant shall paved the access easement with a suitable material to provide a driveable surface for project traffic. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay Traffic Signal and Circulation fees as established by Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? The project will take primary access from Terrace Avenue and secondary emergency access from Vivienda Avenue. The San Bernardino County Fire Department has reviewed the project and determined that emergency access is adequate. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? Community Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The project will include 12 onsite paved parking stalls for employees and visitors. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? The project is located in an industrial area with minimal pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The project site is not located along a designated public transportation route or bike trail. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Rail, waterborne or air-traffic impacts? The project does not require the use of railroads or-air travel to move its products. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. II. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a! Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b Locally designated species (e.g.,heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Community Development Department 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated There are no endangered species known to live in the urban areas of Grand Terrace. The project site is a previously disturbed area with no large trees or riparian areas. a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? There are no known endangered, threatened or rare species known to exist in the City. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Locally designated species (e.g.,heritage trees)? There are no locally designated species, such as heritage trees, onsite. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? The site is previously disturbed with no natural communities onsite. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool? There are no riparian areas onsite. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: f a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ) No mineral resources have been identified within the City. Therefore the development of the office and manufacturing site will not adversely impact any mineral resources. As an industrial use, the project will consume energy resources such as electricity, petroleum fuels, and natural gas. However, the small scale of the project will not result in excessive consumption of any energy product. Community Development Department 16 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? The project will not conflict with any energy conservation plans. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? The project will use energy efficient onsite equipment including a concrete mixer power by electricity.' The office conversion will be.required to comply with current energy conservation guidelines. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? The site is not located in an area designated as a significant mineral resource to the State. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ - ■ emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ hazard? s d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ health hazards? e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ grass, or trees? The proposed project is industrial in nature and involves the manufacture of concrete manhole products. As a small manufacturing operation, it is anticipated that small quantities of hazardous materials will be onsite for quipment maintenance. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? Community Development Department 17 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Minor quantities of oils, solvents, and petroleum products used for equipment maintenance. Improper storage of these materials could result in a hazardous condition. Mitigation: 1. Prior to facility operation, the applicant shall prepare a hazardous materials business plan for submittal to the San Bernardino County Fire District. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The proposed project is not located in an area where it would interfere with an emergency response plan. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? The proposed project may create dust during the manufacturing process. This dust could potentially result in health hazards to onsite employees and local residents. Mitigation: 1. Prior to commencement of operations, the applicant shall acquire all necessary air quality permits and implement mitigation measures as required by AQMD to mitigate potential health hazards due to dust.. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? The site is currently developed as rural residential uses, a pre-existing non-conforming use in the Industrial zone. No health hazards currently exist onsite. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? The site is not located within a high fire hazard area. Site improvements will involve clearing the site of vegetation and debris that may be considered a fire hazard. Community Development Department 18 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. X. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ ■ ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ The site is located between the Burlington Northern Santa Fe main line and a Union Pacific spur. According to the City General Plan Noise Element, these two rail lines generate some of the highest noise levels in the City. The project is located adjacent to an existing single family residential area to the south. The site is approximately 70 feet below an existing bluff where the residences are located. The proposed project involves the manufacture of concrete manhole products. This process includes the mixing of concrete, the movement of formed products to storage areas using forklifts, and the transportation of incoming and outgoing products using heavy duty diesel trucks. a) Increase in existing noise levels? The proposed project will involve outdoor manufacturing and storage using heavy equipment. This hay n potential to generate significant noise levels. The City General Plan Noise Element requires that land s within industrial area maintain a noise level no greater than dBa at Mitigation: 1. All onsite and offsite equipment shall be fitted with acceptable muffler system. 2. The applicant shall provide noise buffers, as necessary, to reduce noise levels at the property line to no more than 55. 3. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday per Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No construction will be permitted on Sunday. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? i The site is located adjacent to.an existing residential area. Noise generated by onsite activities may expose local residents to severe noise levels. Mitigation: 1. All onsite and offsite equipment shall be fitted with acceptable muffler system. 2. The applicant shall provide noise buffers, as necessary, to reduce noise levels at the property line to no more than 55. 3. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday per Community Development Department 19 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No construction will be permitted on Sunday. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ N ❑ ❑ e) Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ The proposed project is located within an urban area. All public services are available to the site. a) Fire protection? The site is located within the City of Grand Terrace. The City provides fire protection services through a contract with the San Bernardino County Fire Department. Fire protection is provided to the general project vicinity through fire hydrants along Vivienda Avenue and Terrace Avenue. Fire Department requirements for industrial projects include fire protection within 150 of all structures. Mitigation: 1. The project will comply with the requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 2. Prior to.the storage of any combustible materials onsite, an onsite fire hydrant shall be installed as approved by the County Fire Department. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. b) Police protection? Police protection for the City of Grand Terrace is provided under a contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. The project is industrial in nature and proposes a six-foot high security fence around the sites perimeters as well as locked gates at all access points. The office will also be installed with a security system. Finding: No.Impact. No mitigation required. c) Schools? Community Development Department 20 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The facility is industrial in nature and therefore will not impact the local school system. As a standard condition of approval, the applicant shall be responsible for paying school mitigation fees based upon its industrial use. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? The project takes access from public roads that are currently in a deteriorated condition. Additional traffic generated by the project may further deteriorate these roads. Mitigation: 1. The project shall repair Terrace Avenue as directed by the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. e) Other governmental services? Not Applicable XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial al ernations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Communications systems? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ ❑ facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Storm water drainage? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) i Solid waste disposal? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ Va ous notices regarding this project were sent to public utility companies. No negative responses were received. The Riverside Highland Water Company indicated that they would work with the developer to service the site. a) Power or natural gas? The proposed project will use minor amount of electrical power for office and lighting. No significant Community Development Department 21 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated impacts to power supplies are anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Communications systems? Telephone service is available to the site. No impacts to communications are anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? The project will use minor amounts of water for office uses and additional water for the mixing of concrete. Significant impacts to local and regional water treatment or distribution systems are not anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Sewer or septic tanks? The current onsite residence uses an existing septic system for wastewater disposal. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. e) Storm water drainage? Local drainage is conveyed to the Santa Ana River via surface drainage systems. No impact to the drainage system is anticipated. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. f) Solid waste disposal? The project is not anticipated to generate significant quanfities of solid waste. All municipal solid waste will be disposed of within the San Bernardino County landfill system. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. g) Local or regional water supplies? Community Development Department 22 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less th]-N oSignificant Significant Signific impact Impact Unless Impac Mitigation Incorporated The project will use minor amounts of water for office uses and additional water for the mixing of concrete. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: — a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c) Create light or glare? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ The proposed project is located in an industrially designated area. Properties to the does not lie near scenic highway or will block scenic vistas. In addition, the project will maintain it's existing architectural style and features. a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? The proposed project is not located near a designated scenic highway. The site is located between two rail lines to the east and west and the Santa Ana River to the north. It is located adjacent to an existing residential area to the south, but lies approximately 70 feet immediately below the residences. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? The project site is located adjacent to an existing residential area. The project will have outdoor storage and operations areas that could visually impact the existing residences. Mitigation: 1. The project site shall be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses. 2. Any proposed fencing for the site shall comply with all applicable requirements and regulations of the i City. i Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. c) Create light or glare? I The site will have outdoor lighting around operations areas and for security. It is located adjacent to an existing residential area that could be impacted by excessive or misdirected lighting. Community Development Department 23 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially ZSigniflca:nt Less than :NoSignificant Significantm pacl Impact Impact Mitigation: 1. All project lighting shall be shielded from adjacent residences and shall comply with the lighting standards of the City of Grand Terrace. Finding: Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: _ a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Affect historical resources? El ❑ ❑ ■ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ El El ■ would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ potential impact area? The site is a previously disturbed parcel currently developed in rural residential uses. No known palentological, archaeological or historical resources exist on the site. No cultural values or sacred uses will be impacted by this prof ect. a) Disturb paleontological resources? The site is a previously disturber site with no known paleontological significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Disturb archaeological resources? The site is a previously disturber site with no known archaeological significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Affect historical resources? The site is a previously disturber site with no known historical significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Community Development Department 24 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated The site is a previously disturber site with no known ethnic cultural significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. _ e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? The site is a previously disturber site with no known religious significance. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. kV. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ parks or other recreational facilities? l ) Affect existing recreational o portunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ The proposed project is industrial and will not result in the use of park and recreation facilities. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? The project is industrial and will not impact parks and recreational facilities. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? The project is industrial and will not impact parks and recreational facilities. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. X�VI. Mandatory findings of significance. a Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or Community Development Department 25 Initial Study and Environmental "Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that'the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of'other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The project site is not located in an environmentally sensitive-area with known biotic species. The site does not contain any examples of significant periods of California history or prehistory. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? The project is a small scale industrial facility that will not have the potential to have significant long-term impacts. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means.that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) The project is a stand alone industrial project located within a designated industrial area. It does not have the potential to result in cumulative impacts resulting from other known developments. Community Development Department 26 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I )�ssues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact j Impact Unless Impact Mitigation i Incorporated i Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human bei---, either directly or indirectly? The project will not result in the creation of environmental effects that cannot be mitigated below a level of significance that could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation required. F ier Analysis. sis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR, or negative declaration. Section D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: er analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at the,Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. In Not Applicable i c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. ■ Not Applicable rand Terrace Community Development Department -A.,uthority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 210'80.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sunstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of ,Supervisors, 22 Cal.App.3d 1337 (1990) 1 Community Development Department 27 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Califorriia Reg gional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region . ........................... Terry Tamminen 3737 Main Street,Suite 500,Riverside,CaJffomja 925............ Secretary for (909)782-4130-Fax(909)781-6288 QO Arnold Schwarze Environmental hftP:/MWw.swrcb.Ca.gOvIrwqcb8 Protection / Gove C mof CLUqENT REC D '`c° q�a�C� �� r i DO s., Received from: (Company name and/or Messenger) 6j Type of Document: 0 SWPPPs ) A21 t cj.+c-,,Jl e) Date Received: R ce ved�by: �� Attachment H I For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, refer to the Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at(800)638-6620- I MAP SCALE 1' = 500' 250 0 500 10000I FEET .. METERS 150 0 150 300 prM PANEL 8687F F V%M la I I FLOG® INSURANCE RATE MAP SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, LQ � CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Ivy i " PANIEL 0607 OF 9400 ' (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) —� m I CONTAIN$ .11 1W COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX COLTON,CITY OF 080273 8687 F SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 060270. 8687 F GRANDE TERRACE,CITY OF D60737 6687 F `. 0- � O ::E=l.�. I l'k I D FES 2 3 2005 Notice to User The Map.Number shown below should be-used II.�-IIII when placing map orders, the Community Number shown 1l Wl above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community_ �, CyMNy9C MAP NUMBER I 06071C0607F °01' 2.5' �; > ® EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 16, 1996 I W ® Federal Emergency Management Agency Attachment I -�;::�:,:.'� ;�... ':a• Qom - [� N fi .�, .\. LO 149 W . .+a..?;.fir YY}''�L%,{r'•"�'1 ::,• ".L,.4'ir ..:i:i).:•.r)i:i�� i1..7'V:• i.Y':v�:;:.��',r�•! _ �� :. f`'�S• ]i .fay.. fig �(•�'' :Jr.R+,:::� ,.' �i7 _ }+r'rr,�r5nc;;:�' 'i,oYiu�rrc,;ts :ail„i. .'.bX:na'• :rr.S;, npa a. '�'i;). i�ot:w. �o}, n:• t hb�� " .:H,g••,'-1'p>•:l�i ':•a�t:r+t'1s j?rr;$t 'vi.. •;. :' - .t$T J t:rers :Y:;w•.4 �7kws.,rF.,;XYs:•`;:i&SA,"•''' � ='w't 7;'r" �:�:W'h�•.-��i.�fr�s`4,.•t'S(1' Y41%;^!yy7.,'a;:�fi�,+t�(t�.li�'-,, - f �rs:r•E+`2"ii+.,- ;�,+:L` :e:jpT,'''py•�."j.x,Y3�th-.�.;r '!',tL .�:i�":6F:{r,.1e;t�;?F,+:,L�•:• r Y.+If+u w'di��•+�iYr• 't-• ''•t::'L r,'7T°nki';r.'.�' .:47}z':v�y%4r (.S,.'vt:r.'t�{iF''�f h N"f7P;'a!';;hy,.i rti'al`. lr rim}•. .`��:� y �;�'< ia':'f'K-�.,•.�il• Q wY,. •.Sv'':!y :.��y�, ; x' tbpy�,c.!. �TF�iftrrj�,l,`t.jir k:IF,:�n.:E '��'j..� r�+••..:N,':1+9h:iyi.�..aYtm°3..^+4 h �i Y?' !w;V;•1;.:4:`.S;;i.ry-:cSF-�:7'•• '{'. 'y�."�•r'y „ �'''S i.9'tk :!."yt1'tom F"'�r'.i :�`•n`r.sfrr'A %' A"7;,:�ly,',Ay'r :,.'t<:; `'i S.,srr;,��,f�:'� t•r.m f'iY.r,,.. SN Ol i. i'rY f , t'C' fri;.,;,,�r- ,ltra,•;.,.r,:S^ ti r,Y: •et fl �b 1,,, 00 •.�� ff':J : ^ .•Lw:"•••):t?f 1r•aq't-''41\:/i t:F.t '1t• •..1i�:r� 'f`-' W I, f=c:`4i••, r �' "d jfY ,Yb.'s`;k i, t'P�ri• "•?2; 5,y;,4 �, y.2'°^�.fj.;'• I,i•i U n�}��11H:"f �:_n��yl�.�%r�+�,ter�, '�u}ir'• W ..:t'e.7.:(� '7�.�,�).C"i: ,.,,/1,�aS" ,�fc•t t� ir' L5" fa si•}rLt:'Y;� f raA'r/�+{klti'6e.y4's::L:f',�,'te•i-1:f•""=�•;Yt/+u�1.ti cSrt*,�::'.�d�'r''.';S:,�,a>>I��r�'1,,�{f'y•":��r:r1:RPg:,F:,'�''�r;.:Y.t t rT>:+�n•..a.:.K.N�0 iC.,'w.!�.y f:$di;�t i N#'��.�.?•;'^�ti�-Yij.:'�'',.'lr�h+S.i7iqrl,%S4.br r�EEliAr''�'�-��::l:�)��,5 J:,r.:'',;'?,:3�"1t•,.y'i'islP,f4,f.".k.�t.(,,r�ii''.y`.,�f+;,tii-`,r�.�{+�rx�_1ytA'�f�'.,'�w�{l��)r:`ri:y�t.. rr`,�''trU%'�4,•f''�i=.trh''�3..:s.�7,r'�S�t,ySl(g�ari'+;lrXli�,ff,,:�:�;Y.l'fir�t^Jt.: IZ"' r� \ I W cc Z W WO Q�/.I W . � O Z .v:ii'fir:fF k,.' '+ 3t`::•{,; ;ti!!;:6}if` i�`�'li i•t:uYd.::ti.�r , ENV e f<lt,�:�s„,.��''f1a. k t•>r a.a;;i';�;��N''t4�'•,,:4a z?;i¢,.K;:t:;r: U F O tc i�.�ti. {7'"u.u::'�'`'�O.'" rr•�lN :si <tris.... ,. "•:;::_`'' O V Z l.Y,c+.,:r,.« f 1��h� t'sit};�s��'�.'� 4t,tik' �•1.�' `.r` U' f='i W OROS cl Go nos r• .. 'Jr.rr,�. .. , LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT The 1% annual chance flood.0 00-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The special Flood Hazard'Area is the area subject to flooding by the I% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base W45' Flood Elevation is the water surface elevation of the 1%annual chance flood. ZONE No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONEAH Flood depths of I to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of I to 3 feet (usually-sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan hooding, velocities also determined. ZONE AR Area of special flood hazard formerly protected from the 1% annual chance flood event by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide protection from the I% annual chance or greater flood event. ZONE' A99 Area to be protected from 1%:', annual chance flood event by a Federal flood protection system under 11 construction; no base flood elevations determined. ZONE V, Coastal figod zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. )NE ZONEVE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 196 annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE.X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than I square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. C� OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.296 annual chance floodplain. IEX ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined,but possible. 1EX E A9 COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS . F 77 OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS WAS) CBRS areas and OPAs are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. NErA Floodplain boundary Floodway boundary )ODING Zone D boundary :ECTS )MI CBRS and OPA boundary Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different kSH A . ........... Base Flood Elevations,flood depths or velocities. -513 Base Flood Elevation line and value;elevation in feet* (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in feet* r Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 'Cross Section Line Partial List of Services Provided Office Management We would like to take this opportunity to Our office management is headed by Mark in entrocluce ourselves. Manhole Builders, ® the scheduling department, and Cathy in the Inc., previously known as PMI, has Standard Sewer Manholes estimating and accounting department. rightfully carried the reputation for being ® S-36 Type Manholes They are ready to fill your needs in a dependable and for furnishing superior professional and efficient manner. We take workmanship. This is no doubt due to the ® Metering Manholes pride in being able to accommodate your fact that we take good old fashioned pride work schedule, and in keeping our prices in the duality of our work, which has Safety Manholes very competitive. ensured us with a repeat customer base, 9 PVC Manhole Lining founded primarily on referrals. We have enjoyed a smooth running business with Drop Manholes Our Precast Supplier safety as a number one priority. ® Monitoring Manholes r a We 'install Southwest Concrete ® Siphon Manholes t'' T,;'► Products; known for their quality About our Owners and service; a leading manu- m _� facturer since 1966. We are proud of the family tradition we've continued to this day. The President of Our company is Eddie Jaureguy, a third 1 ation manhole His father, generation Ina o e builder. s ;'��e ii1�'•„,,.v:� •....� e•<� t .c; W,� ,,m.}{;�..,> = . Ed recently retired witha`^ over 45 years x _:e.• ::�;: •.r fi,:�,.••,:�,;,.,•.'• >,��r� ,.. experience In coIlstructin g ,�¢, <i ^;`' '>., euF �'+'; ,r k'r •'..,; p' manholes �� .;y:.y ,.. �< ,•,: ' :�=:;:. .��=...� R�m� spanning back to the da s of brick manhole building. Eddi s bro r-in-aw ,Uhq.,e "rr:"' c`_r i? C.5:fi�at'.a,.�;:y::'bs 7y p�,f `•rm:rq,� ," sv �;G�a. ryy+J -� ..� �.� •:.� ..�_ �.�'-� - � �' �.tiy. ,,.a •_,r_ �..�z. ,�t<; Mark Hundle s Vice C'F.�., i w,•t i�,::: E >.fi� . :�1: ;.1'.' X(d .��1+ t 'ov y i -President:, and is . '��:' .-':,.2;. ,� ''�' ^''?.•;� ' ` happy to have his son Greg a fourthl �nr generation c"'ti:�.�;:�a': •zr: ;� ioo'• a: ,el,'�Mk�;,',t.:^:. •1 g ation manhole builder,workl.ng for us �, "'r"�• 'P'` n°' ` '. 1P �t",Ft 'y, � m"5 r out in the field. Cathy y Jaureguy has been ra�r� �' ,`irv, ..7'k.2•`°. a: w �' r• •� i� '�� with our familyr'`^r.r""'iP�'��'ia:o rC:�.'u_+i'y",u�T'o�:. {r.��,y�, � ,�.E:,,��rryypkti• business since the •e t�ht.+�:, erw , k Iti�»t ..''j��, ^•S@s �w y: :w OLII' q.,.r°' ;i is wr, tetTWd�y1 Lii 4 f•F.`:e +5? beginning of PMI days and is our ` 2tisi, Secretary / CFO. All three � owners enjoy combined total of over 70 years in the Flume for metering manhole =' �^ �'S manhole business. :fir:-•:.k.+. '�� Contractors & Some 6f our Projects Developers J We are P• roud to say that we have enjoyed • California State Prison, Lancaster many loyal relationships with contractors • Ontario Mills Mall in our business, some that have spanned over 25 years. Please take note of just a • Disneyland Improvements sample of our extensive resume of pipeline 5021 Stone Avenue contractors and developers. LA County Fairground -Improvements - Riverside, CA 92509 • Long Beach Town Center Phone (951) 681-0601 0 Babco Constriction Fax (951) 681-0608 • Ontario Airport 0 S.J. Burkhardt, Inc. • Frito Lay, Ontario CJW General Contracting ` ; u' �;.` .�;,' fli;• "L .;'Y. Stanley ch, Inc. Homes Lewis Development ., ;�.� K t[F .. �C iC.S 1✓1'Z :i•'.`'•i�,1,' ;,rdi' °'= 1 "i:'':y»: ® ':%i ,��' {:'••'•�F�•n Y J 'EJi?C!�R�i`�'�5 1i�i� y�•'`''�" EftI'; r • Centex Homes ,l, ,,s�' �•:•. .�� •.•. �,,��, �, �, r ,t'�.• ..'�'t" yY"^�:�`r�� Lf��rai�,,�'iT�by,', (��')a Ru. X, •IY.II•::'.�.. K. Hovnanian Tea:�1�►y '�y�y►N�Li F�v1 �tk i� 1a. Van Daele Development �A a Lennar Homes r';:n4k:. �•p'�_'(•Y11��'•� .{,1yf��T�fy:Yt`::+`�•'L Coil z�`'"+ �.�'.; �-Y'��"�z�;..: ,: `�-•�•y, s- y. �' Tilden Constructors •�M;:`"'�a ��'=�=:�-;': • �'.'�:n;,�;==:: "; fir • Fullmer Construction - *Manhole Builders services all water 0Oltmans Construction Company districts in the Southern California License No. 831892 area.* P R O D U C T I N F O R M A T. 1 O N % ADVA (.;U�it 500 High Range Water-Reducing Admixture ASTM C 494, Type F ADVA ADVA° Cast 500 is a '3`high range water-reducing admixture w` :..,_ specifically formulated for recast J•P k:; i""�` applications. It is a low viscosity S. liquid, which is ready to use-as r' received. ADVA Cast 500 i 3 manufactured under closely •t, --yam t"•' .` - controlled conditions to provide uniform, predictable performance and is formulated to comply with S+ '; specifications for Chemical ! . +z; . ASTM . .,.' Admixtures for Concrete, :,� js'.+r,'�'• '� 'F-::' `=� •' - Designation C 494 as a Type F :; f*, admixture. ADVA Cast 500 - contains no intentionally added -' -�,' ' .: calcium-chloride. Supplied as an amber colored liquid, one liter t .�• 4r,; _ ;, ; weighs approximately 1.05 kg - `' 'rs •• ,, (one gallon weighs approximately 8.7 lbs). ADVA Cast 500 is specifically • ADVA Cast 500 concrete formulated to enhance the set surface finishes with reduced ADVA Cast 500 high range water time and early strength bug holing. reducer (Superplasticizer)produces development of concrete. • ADVA Cast 500 concrete even concrete with extremely workable at high slump, exhibits no characteristics referred to as high significant segregation in slump, flowing concrete. It also o ADVA Cast 500 can be used to comparison to concrete allows concrete to be produced reduce energy requirements of without a superplasticizer at with very low water/cement ratios external heat for accelerated the same slump. for high strength. curing. • ADVA Cast 500 is highly ADVA Cast 500 is ideal for ADVA Cast 500 concrete efficient,producing a high slump applications where it is desired to produced with Type I cement concrete at a low dosage rate. keep the water/cement ratio to a may be substituted for concrete a ADVA Cast 50 o0 is added to minimum and still achieve the produced with Type III cement to achieve earl release concrete mix water for rapid degree of workability necessary to Y provide easy placement and strengths. hatching. adequate consolidation. Attachment K Construction products P R O D U C T N F • O R M A T 1 0 N o r t Non-Corrosive, Non-Chloride Set Accelerating Admixture ASTM C 494, Type C PolarSet®is a non-corrosive, non- : chloride admixture for concrete. j It accelerates cement hydration resulting in shortened setting times and increased early com- pressive strengths. �f�'.�`�:z 't�' ^%xQ .r. Fi -f �t--_,,•. ��,^ u. ��.• .:�':°tom .. �Y-j — '1:.! FY•. :Y:a :�j ,.,{�.;a`Ati_'•Z$ 71 PolarSet does not contain calcium t" chloride and is completely non- corrosive to reinforcing steel, metal decks, and to all metal com- ponents of your admixture stor- age and dispensing system. It is formulated to comply with ASTM C 494 Type C and can be used at any dosage to comply with ACI For conditions not subject to be avoided. It can also be used in 318 guidelines for chloride con- freezing, PolarSet may be used to concrete that is to be placed on tent of concrete. One Liter of speed finishing operations and/or steel clad or zinc coated steel PolarSet weighs approximately form removal, leading to savings decks where corrosion must be 1.35 kg (11.25 lbs/gal). in concrete construction costs. similarly avoided. i I PolarSet is specially formulated to PolarSet provides set time acceler- In concrete mixes, PolarSet accel- reduce concrete setting times and ation and early strength develop- crates the chemical reaction increase early strengths for con- ment similar to that provided by between portland cement and crete in very cold conditions, and calcium chloride, but without the water. It speeds up the formation imay be used to reduce the time potential corrosive effects. of gel—the binder that bonds that concrete must be protected PolarSet can, therefore, be used concrete aggregates together. against freezing in ambient tem- where potential corrosion of Accelerated gel formation in turn peratures as low as -TC (207). embedded or stressed steel must shortens the setting time of con- GRACE, Construction Products P R O D U C T N F O R M A T 1 O N o Daravlair 1000 Air-Entraining Admixture-ASTM C 260, AASHTO M 154 Daravair® 1000 is a liquid L air-entraining admixture that `' -•;, '# - - -. -- -_. - provides freeze-thaw resistance, yield,control and finishability performance across the full range of concrete mix designs. Daravair �u •t ; j s.':. :s. 1000 is a clean, light-orange product-designed to generate s.1�J specification-quality air systems. `' t� Based on a high-grade saponified rosin formulation,Daravair 1000 is chemically similar to vinsol- R based products, but with increased purity and supply dependability : o It Daravair 1000 air-entraining s admixture may be used wherever the purposeful entrainment of air is required by concrete specifica- • High Cement Factor the concrete. This can permit a tions. Formulated to perform • Fly Ash and Slag reduction in mixing water with no across the entire spectrum of • Superplasticizers loss of slump.Placeability is production mixes,Daravair 1000 o Manufactured Sands improved. Bleeding, plastic generates quality,freeze-thaw shrinkage and segregation are resistant air systems in concrete minimized. conditions that include the Air is incorporated into the con- Through the purposeful entrain- following: Crete by the mechanics of mixing and stabilized into millions of dis- ment of air, Daravair 1000 • Low Slump h increases the durabili • Paving Crete semi-microscopic bubbles in markedly tl` • Central Mix the presence of a specifically of concrete to severe exposures s Extruded Slip Form designed air-entraining admixture Particularly to freezing and thaw- * Mixes Containing Hot W in . It has also demonstrated aater such as Daravair 1000. These air g bubbles act much like flexible ball remarkable ability to impart resis- and Accelerators tance to the action of frost and ® Precast bearings increasing the mobility, or plasticity and workability of deicing salts as well as sulfate, sea and alkaline waters. C4'fil Construction Products i:�- vSi: `•s= - _ ___ ._ti_�� a +ti -', i J r_ r• - . r . Aft . -�y_r•�vJS4� -_,1.�E-?�..'TA• �1-Y-'yf�� +�•.f-�.•...�'�='3�V"'". ati: iJ'.{r•�C•��i-_ '"� > ? � v FV'-• t� _ M1.-�•„c ._is r�. � y ''��' c �` ��'� .,•x �� r c•r •�� - f r�' F r�� i--_ �s �1.♦� t'•� 'd.;.�.Y1G�'��•�-'G -•�j _: -:� �n�4�•:ff`��`,--�tT = '' Fst �':�,F� �♦.�- - ==U'�.�J�.,.�-• - -- �"-_' -�rC: '-Y'i� - _`r�' ��{o�t�'$''1�-SG• - '��.fil�..1 C `��r�=76��`s� �_ - �Y` ___ _ ♦ ..x.;'e,' �..•'..:.•..•:•x..�3..fre-'i• a..0- t' h!� �-`.� �cr`� _ -':�i ..- tip a.• - _ _ - oGtsf ' ca Inc.Pr , l its:' i Poucts .0t pan ' • • 1 • : Ili • : : � 1 • • • � ® , - ®• DIMENSIONS: Description Model-2000 Batch-Mixer Model-2000-Batch-Mixer & Silo Model-2000 Overall Length 24'-0" w/Auger 52'-0" w/Auger Width 8'4" 8'-4" 8'-6" Diame Height 10'-8" 10'-8" / 10'-10" 22'-0" Set-Up Area/Square Foot 200/SF 433/SF 100/SF* .(Mixer w/round Silo - 500SF) ® ® ® mom ® MM ® CAPACITIES: PRODUCTION: Aggregate Bins - 343 cubic feet Production Rate - 20 - 24 cubic yards per hour of 5.5 Bag Mix Batcher Cement Bin - 57 cubic feet STANDARD-EQUIPMENT: 13 cu. Yd. Aggregate Bins Product Counter 12 ft. Dual Action Mixing Al Electric Auger Winch 220 V 3 ph Electric Drive Motors Aux. Admix Power Outlet; Control Panel w/Main Disconnect Pressure Regulated Water System Cement Level Sight Windc Skid Mounted for Portability POTIONS: Cement Hopper Level Indicator 180' Auger Swivel Liquid Admix System WNW Ask Us ! = ' We have the knowledge, experience, & equipme that•will answer all of your mixing 'needs. V. iK7• • _ ��' _ _ 3 - 'r-�3ti�r_ r�. Spa: v-�-- . .;*• TL Lr�y-• S FN �' /,•. _ � �l .(..L.1!rtlaw-i>S�'.' �� 1. ! The Del otto-2003 Silo / Batch-Mixer / Bucket all are designed to keep pace with your growing business... We are continually seeking to improve all Del Zotto Products.-Toward that end we reserve the right to change prices and specifications without noti, ©2000-2003 Del Zotto Products will litigate all participants in infringements on Patents,Patents Pending,Copyrights,and Proprietary Information. •=5;•To-_��:��.a:'Xs�:Z:,;:�f,�+•.y'�}:'.�y�.�;.-_mil'`. �' _-.-:_tit::^• • :... � . rat-� i`•x.t 5, .3:��w��.>i.::.=�"/�''•.' Rn v F :} 7 � t. `.-44 s! tt- tv F + 2 _ •. •. i :�-t"ma's?'''u�r � � 3 am- #-.rX t by p.ji: S S•i. - -•-,=?ai} 4Fj E' -a•c 5 •'3„ � s � t�� { a < Y z 4ws� 1 S �y��_"--��1-•.-�^.1__•,.•i•_�.•-^`yam y�r..s:�'�+^ ,.1 T; 1- . l3rf�l�f�!',If�, J '�- n.•� ..� � .ft-:.. - - - .3�:<i-::�f,C;�i�, PRECAST STORAGE AREA --/1A N F: :" vda<a:a:::aasee:ai.=::aeada:ei::=s5i.::es::z:=�L:Gisce±a::sc::eaaaeaB.:AS:xa.SiafeEsc.':-eaefasnas_aeetSaasaitmece:a.iaa.:asaii±iac::itie:a:aaaausssaase:eaie:_az:Se:u5sds5siziacsccadeasuxa:aaevea:a:c:ac 5021 Stone Avenue • Riverside, CA 92509 (951) 681-0601 Pax: (951) 681-0608 i March 31, 2005 City of Grand Terrace Planning Division 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 I Re: Requested Letter of Intent i To Whom It May Concern: We would like to take this opportunity to introduce ourselves. Manhole Builders, Inc. is the result of four generations of hard work in the sewer contracting business, specializing in manhole installation. The three owners have a combined total of over 70 years in the business. Our success in the industry has now made it possible to expand into the manufacturing of the product we have been installing all these years. By cutting out the middle man, we will have more control over the service we can provide to our contractors, and product availability. Please see the accompanied brochure to get further insight into our company's history. The manufacturing of the precast manholes is a simple production process. It begins with the pouring of concrete each morning into metal manhole forms that have been wire reinforced. Mid-afternoon, when the concrete dries, the forms are removed and another set of manholes are poured for the day, stripped the next morning, and the proce: j continues. The finished precast is then removed by a loader from the outdoor production area and transferred to tl.� storage area. A boom truck will load and deliver to our installation crew in the field once or twice a day. We have provided pictures of the type of truck and loader we will be using, as well as, the concrete mixer used in the production process. The admixtures we use in the concrete ensure the needed strength of the concrete, as well as the required drying and curing time. OSHA specs are enclosed. None of the admixtures are considered to be hazardous ,materials according to the EPA. We would like to ensure you that we are working closely with all Water Quality Control and Air Quality Control 'boards in order to conform to required permitting processes and pollution prevention planning. Enclosed you will find our completed permit applications. We are receiving assistance from the Water Quality Control Board's ;representatives with our SWPPP program. Our company is excited that we found property in the city of Grand Terrace, and we look forward to working successfully in your city for many years to come. Thank you for your time and attention to the review of our project :plans. Sincerely, Stacy uregu-y Project Coordinator Manhole Builders, Inc. r (909) 997-0900 (909) 467-2383 FAX - Attachment M TEr sm P.O. Box 18355 phone:949 552 4357 Irvine CA 92623 fax: 909494 4408 e-mail:tepirvine@sbcglobal.net mobile: 909 263 0383 Date: _ May 16, 2005 To: Jeff Golihar, City of Grand Terrace From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer (TR1433) Subject: Comments on Manhole Builders, Inc. Site Improvements Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue File No: NA It is recommended that the project applicant be conditioned to pave the access road to the project site. In addition, the applicant may be conditioned to repair any pavement failures and potholes on Terrace Road on the primary route of access to the project site. I have no additional comments concerning this project at this time. 5 Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc. ' Attachment N j II nuisoay, lyltsy Imo, 6vva f.vv nri �rafg�7.IV9USt2®0t®r a4b�aL 4=t U1 P• I sill F.O. Box 18355 phone.949 552 4357 Irvine CA 92623 fax: 909494 4408 e-mail:Yepirvine@sbcglobal.nee molme: 909 263 0383 Date: May 19, 2005 i To: Jeff Golihar, City of Grand Terrace From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer (TR1433) Subject: Comments on Manhole Builders, Inc. Site Improvements(Additional Comments) Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue File No: NA I , I have previously recommended that the project applicant be conditioned to pave the access road to the project site. Jerry Glanders the City Director. of Building and Safety, has informed me that do to future roadwork that is contemplated for the near future, it would be inappropriate to require construction of a permanent pavement surface at this time. Instead, j he is recommending that a temporary surface treatment be applied such as decomposed granite (d.g.). I concur with this recommendation. The width of the temporary surface treatment should be 20 to 24 feet. I j In addition, the applicant should be conditioned to repair any pavement failures and potholes on Terrace Road from Vivienda to the project driveway. Pavement failures are defined as any gaps in the existing pavement due to subsidence of the underlying base, or other reasons. - I � j I have no additional comments concerning this project at this time. I i f 4 Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc. I Attacb men t 0 MAY-24-2005 TUE 10:24 AM FAX N0, Pr 01 Eeonoanic OgvdopmvnVPublic Services Group � (DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . , MFLISSA WALKER,P.E. ""' F11blie Works Enginocr III Flood Conpor Prennv o �,�: nTvaWer¢dpwlCeounry v nmi mi rcp lr.i nidr. (909)397-8120 825 E.Tnird Simot,Room 122 I:.(90B)387.8130 � San Bomwdno.CA 024IS-0835 cc Attachment P MAY-24-2005 TUE 10:24 AM FAX NO. P. 02 3lossary of Flood Control Terms Ydgc 1 01 z 30C d impaired water Body-is an impaired water body in which water quality does not meet applicable water quality standards ' andlor 6s not expected to meet water quality standards,even after the application of technology based pollution controls required by the diiari Water Act.Section 303(d)requires the establishment of TMDL's for those watorbodies.The discharge of urban runoff to these water bodies by the Co-perrnittees is significant because these discharges can cause or contribute to violations of applicable water quality standards. j I I I t 7!�> VA � r YCv-sicke +0 O V� \ t ' i \ r,vt k C'V\k0 rcw � i ✓\ I i hti :l/WWw.floodcoiitrol.co.riverside.ca.us/districtsite/content/glossary.htm 5/24/2005 2002 CMA SECTION 303(d) LIST OF WATER QUALITY LB11TED SEGMENT Apr-,,,,'U'L;3EPel: SAINTA ANA REGIONAL IWATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD < 9110 mot .. ; 'ram % -IzA*0 ,• wV4 F0 CD 8 R Santa Ann River,Reach 4 801127000 cyl Pathogens Low 14 Mites -j Lx 'N'Dopolal Source 8 RSantiago creek,Rmcb 4 90112000 S2L1iaitv#TD&'Cb10 rid ts r\:) tA)W 9A Nfilln OD. Source Unknown => r: �..r'a-.A-= 8 C Seal Beach 80111000 Eztemcocri LOW 0.53 Miles Impaired SO)kvds around drofn at Isl Sweet. Source Unknown rz '2 A-=.-f-a:'-;�'V"i�-.::l Z: 9 f R Silversda Creek 80112000 Pathogens Low 11 b MIS llmknowuNaupaint Source Salluityf[DR(CIblorides Low 11 Miles UnknownNonpoin I Source 8 R Summit Creek 80171000 Nuirlears High 1.5 Milts ConsiructionfLand Development 2M Page 4 of 7 CoCZ) 2002 C-WA SECTION 303(d) LIST OF-WATER QUALITY-LDMED 9EGM-EN-T- SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD < C:) C=) crl REGION-Al VAI*EgOtJ,11,ITYCO.TROL130ART)5 WATFRI)ODYTYPE I North Coast B— Bay$and Harbors 2 Sark Francisco Bay C= Coastal Shortlimes/8"ches 3 CienfrACums( E— Estuaries 4 Las Angeles L Lskev/Raservinrs 5 Central Valley Rivers and Streams 6 Latotalso Saline Laken 7 Colorado River Basin T Wetlau"Tidal /Ii:4N Santa Ana NV= )Ve02nds,Freshwater C;--, Sam Diego CALWATER%%.,'1TERSM "Calwater Watershed"is The State Water Resources Control Board bydrological subnott area or an even smxUcr area delineation. GROUPAPE -ICIDE50RCHENIA uldrivi,dieldrin,chlordane,endria,beptacbior,heplachlarepaxide, hriachlorocyclohexane(including lindane),endusuffixu,and toxaphene p O Page 7of7 CD .r• Y,I Mtn I;y• .j. NIAI.IIr _ T" _.i—�—�— ..,a..- /,�,,- •:f�_ ._ \_�� _ .. r1. `I .r �.P�^.�...r�.--�' -` �i. Jl __ ia+-= '1?- l ?i � [ItaM r l 4_ ..�� =1^�r�. / '' •I..j ,.l -L 1. oTyei0.16 GA a.., 10 ' +'= - �� - fA5 1 •� I. VIr .. _ 1... •- Li _ (�; i. t 9�}; L�1 r': `I _It 1. �.�G��•I On vES`rya SAW .. 'i r,l �• ...., ._I, �. - tt! -, :S"I"i 5- - \:` i -'C ,Irwlr_ �� d•.1 i;J N• p�e°.yl�l ', �- :r �t ' t i��r • 'a I .1 -� +^ -• -- '�� t- -':.Pja'tFl i; .1;�- •a '.1°''N w/ --••99 "'; � CFI el F :�. .. :•I�Ifr1` , -- :'r;> - =� ,2„ 1 ..'- .- i - Ya F. ; 'UNrif y I `a rt _�.{�f ew1 , _ .. -�' ':.1^�^+'''1Y•li.w:,r• :'`';•� �_ l U9 1 ••' •�:; I.,:i(� wsP� to - _ ��. t �� ••�:- :• .'- _ "�: i-� rri - - 'as _I` ter--•'—__'.:�--._••. 1 _ - ,`:='!A a � �_ C i 'i! ..•� _ t /} 4�la.,J'• J _ { r1��1..'r'i'' I _i,•l 1 �„l•µ�• ; j� �• '' 4:..'�'._ =._�%�i(° /O ��1�`,�` l .v. •I �° 1 '�' r `a ru�:,w ... :'�l}•l•• -� '„d.: � l' .1! X+ '+ � 'l • �',� -. �� '` '�-'�''w :•�y E s�0� .f+ , f• 'J;i l it'a' I l v `•.:+.• , �,} „�►J- • 1.— ,,, �� :}..,\ �r1 R '•l- � /- 23 � � ( t� ' „I w t 'r! •. �i a q_,. /;• r .tl100mi11Qldlr'�•'.- •��„ _ - •.-.r, t ',1• / 1_. _ _".-'•r"" f.�' ..'�-'j ;7 l '�_ _l�i; `i �'f,.. - - _-rvy ca �rFf ` RR-+�q � i �c-• •, i �� — r'• ,. '•J.. }, ' }. 11 �j •SOV1►1IES7' ti_. �CDCt•rr}`1, 1 � �:.'n• '.�..: •i , tGa14 L `�. t!: '•-i I 4% •01: z� ��ar. Orel -•lr-: �l ��,��y':. �- Std+u O q� :r 1 1_ I / 1,. i• _ "e.��.l...J :t i.j �Ir Y � 11 -1 •75 Y !r -a.. �� f l.rll:i f.i J■ �.<i �. i t I• ter.:•: J . �•• ^ 1• r: 1 •1 I ^ ' - aG � / '., ��,`(��`- Wylly�•x l I ; �.�.'fi•,': - + � %4::'-� _ 10, orr r •6•. 1 "1 '`' ~' � �.1 J! �1,� Vy rr l .•-�'' .. \ - ':'a."'.:m':.,J•' �_1,...'+� •':,,,y;• .. "i1-t.�;a ....._• � ir,,,-,.y '�•� Q�i,11. �' \ 1 _ \.. _, ��^ +t• 't ,r�01.U18>},� X �T- -r•-" ;a3 •9 lrYll� + _ _ a�.�v��:: •.�` arm Y It,\'.. � .A. J I 4•,A.,� new 3'1 ��'}•� S• 'S••I - 9.l' i ,. ., � 1 y - '•; '." ,1'�J4`Nert�il a I �•• 'I � � .•w�- _�Y+1.�• 3• '•"'t;• . � •t1,. Il ••^ =�-•` .. e��.°i+ti:'Ei�•+,if ' 0'','tRid-".vJ�i_; �� ', , � i s \ 1� 3 N ��J•b,.,.. t' � 4 P,}1'•.Iacr_ „ - �' l .. .�`i. •!'`•:*S' 4'>•aR7 J. 1'1' a:.L ..•. r ': ,• _ 6 �' \. � � O r'n• - tea•• d* �'.1. . . '' ..r .�. --_-.r,-♦ !`.`.. .-•.-a-�•< '�.ter,,T.-�t�• �, � '�r� L,�1 i �:•. �< � •�1' � �P�p1._- , r\, .l �-+,,..". � •II IItOw■MAIN'- 7ORM -T •J \ter_•�, ,` r- '.�I'1 r y.••,�:t , !' ��^"9 1, r ' f; `;a7 �V •l Icy #1.`• - y \ M`. ^ �Ir'" .S•! 1 j 1 l •• �, _ 1 •IY �• .I - t�1ti.�/ .;: I .1 �,y f.•• . :�1��.5 . .:. �• � Y+:a\I. 1 t.,., 1 1 t _r`Zr' zji,l u •I,{i�r• / r " ,'s '• e` =��. �:• `s- `_..i•i.i 'w...r• -j' J._ Ci •'141f' �' - i 5•t:%i:-• '�•J �'" ''` .ti•l ft '•41,��: r S• �,4 -♦ „ �'I ,�?•�: • ry;`�`.�y+ti ,,�•`. - i � � I .,S,I .. �� I •I '•�:yl � g =Yq.S- �1. r _ • � l�]C1Fz/•� �.irk: .. *i� J i , `• 1 i4i/i:•� ..a " I � .`I`. , I ,,.' _�_ \`. ' „ 1 S t'\ 1 -. fj ICAN mvp _ .1 I �'• .I.. • :llI l,_ `: '',." S.1 �((!1 a, 1•}I•• _ \1-7 FF1 ,CGU An�r><� ?{... - l�t� +' J,s.= o-1 .It,,l,,,...• _ }. - - - ---'--- : y''_¢•i' i __ --�..I t_- �-•— 'i �'—:-- - — 1- _23 7 it 4 ;l L C= C.-— CD X.= w ry vu r j-::E> p ap 16 741- -:Inr klA .33 ...... Zell eamillglDn 6-- LIP tin: L .30 EST r SDJ A 4t LV => t ;VIR :3s 35 pp PPMA.%*% Z= 34 31 Is, 43 t If tf p 46 c�G Ss_P\0 154 cor T"ml "'LIZ GENERAL INFO.. ------- "A I.Rill.X.C,9" v ix� t v=A v; pl MW s air4 w J a BUILDING LEGEND 5f— .0 11- -�killl Fill :—.;!lm". 33 v I W WWWA W.; r (D "'A r 7z. .014 MW i A V =tUMM SITE NOTES N1Vqg tm C., ;'.!K:lj�J"V;M*.;;' ;r pVffllllll�Cr-gfl! rNi:sod;V1, -tc, r Wl.i .01 11.M e- + iM IliarM. faSilpR ut P.7 Co 4L20 2 M -21 ef J, V,viliifi-d ell MGM 4)111 11(f MY lOv • SITE PLAN' • .anKA•lS wc::f+J mcn u:ir ou•Ot u.!Ia '� SU.L'uIY,MW _ _ _ �-__�1�j�?;{J[(�'ye��N EJYI90�(�M ElJY Yf J1S�W}+�1w, —_•._.•—_ .••5 =•_.__. l`��- [rLtY,lu!!1.;.Nr:GT'.:!. , '� ~�•RyWw.fCLR:�_.—_._._i 'r „ • .r 5`\ \ rC"- !Kol u —.___ ._. .____..—_—.—___.. .._.._.j Jf U:✓L'I!•W"r91 ,1 •_.U•m4 ah'wF tl N•.1.AI•1:•'( '• r10 6 1I1111 • � 4'J.-c PI R:.n Cti'aG N.R.RIT�.., I •• \�'� 0W'4.6C LIIA:C Nd � ot. 'CiHVr Olt'. VI 1 1 I 3.1•I }• ED ` .o W_-_arwrr run—._____.._. _. 1 \.`b` � ••: co I :C 14 wmrtc NfB hCi J\ �p N;u V — n �'� NI7R1 B ♦ ` ,�� II I I i """r \\ G 51 2C'Of IMy ♦ PLANTING PLAN 3.® I I i �• � � j j�'j � ! J j I � i LIJ SOO 1 I I a I z a m I a z aPChimetrICs Manhole Builders, Inc.: Og e Seo w,xnN M.SWE 210 21712 VIVIENDA AVENUE SO R.M. —I'--:e:u eF•1P.U.:eD1 i 12eS)em-Sec. GRAND TERRACE,CA 92315 i j z '411 �g P-5 W ,' . A"ll I 1Y M No Vg- ot i I '. M, . RT -y A,;w rfA g, FE N SO L MK"l NNW M OU V q! V 10 WAM; Rj 12" Mal 2 Nil �,.?l Al �V TA, v5 Ng, PAN F UM pg ,pl�-4 &Ig Mg. 'a VAT A. -'W MIT -Og All. o� �RoNDJERR cE Community and Economic Development Department AGENDA THE REGULAR MEETING"OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WILL BE HELD ON DATE: May 19, 2005 p PLACE: Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California i' 7:00 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/ is - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Call to Order i: Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Public address to Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless Aextended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community and Economic Development. t PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: • This is a time for anyone in the audience to speak on any item, which is not on the agenda for this meeting. ITEMS: 1. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2005 RECOMMENDATION: Approval Attachment J 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, Cajifornia 92313-5295 • (9uy) arm-Uv�l j 2. SA-04-21, CUP-04-10 E-04-12: Continuation of the project that will consist of a completely new auto service station with convenience market, car wash, and- delicatessen. The convenience market will have a deli, a walk-in cooler, beer and wine sales and convenience goods. Also proposed will be freeway signage identifying new service station and other' businesses on the site. The existing service station building, existing signs and landscaping will be removed and replaced with a new service station building, new signs, including new freeway sign, and a new car wash. The existing fuel canopy will be retained'and extended. The new station may be operate(-----. as a Valero Station. j APPLICANT: RAMCAM,Corp., on behalf of business owner, Mr. Fahim Tanios LOCATION: 22045 Barton Road (Approximately .66 acre parcel located on the south side of Barton Road just east of the 1-215 Freeway off- ramp., This site was operated as a Texaco and Shell fueling station in the past.) RECOMMENDATION: Open the continued Public Hearing, receive the staff report and public testimony, if any, and take this.matter "off-calendar". 1 3. SP-04-02-, SA-04-0-2 SA-04-03, SA-04-04 SA-04-05, SA-04-06 TTM-04-01, E-04-01: Continuance of application for construction of a total of 16 lots, 15 to be developed with single family detached type units on individual lots ranging in size from 4,460 square feet to 5,914 square feet. The 16th lot of 12,007 square feet to be developed into a 4-plex type apartment building. APPLICANT: Massaro and Welsh, Civil Engineers, on behalf of Barney Karger, Owner/Developer. i LOCATION: Approximately 2 acre vacant area consisting of ,two parcels l I located on the north side of De Berry Street between the Gage I Canal on the west and Mt. Vernon Avenue on the east. i RECOMMENDATION: Re-open the Public Hearing and receive the staff report and any public testimony. The Staff is making no recommendation for this. ` proposal at this time; however, the Planning Commission may I wish to consider three possible actions consisting of: 1. Deny these applications for the reasons given in the attached 'Resolution of Denial" which is to deny this project because of a lack of information after giving the I applicant more than sufficient time, almost one year, to provide the requested information. 2. r ti 1 2. Continue these items to a "date uncertain" but give the applicant a new deadline to submit all, of the requested information to Staff by a specific date. Inform the applicant that failure to meet this new deadline will result in the denial of the project. (Once the staff has reviewed and analyzed the new information, the Public Hearing would be then rescheduled before'the Planning Commission). 3. Continue these items to a "date uncertain" until the applicant has -submitted the requested additional information and Staff has had enough time to review it. 1 4. SA-05-05, E-06-03 - CU.P-05-02: To construct a wireless telecommunication facility as part of a network covering the Southern California area consisting of a 52 foot high monopole designed to resemble a pine tree and a small equipment building. APPLICANT: Nextel Communications, Barbara Saito - representative LOCATION: 21893 Barton-Road in the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive the staff report and testimony, close the hearing and approve the Resolution calling for approval 1 of SA-05=05,. CUP-05-02 and E-05-03 based on the findings in the "Resolution of Approval" and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. 5. SA-05-06, E-05-04: The conversion of an existing single story, 1-,350 square foot home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion of an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: 21712 Vivienda Avenue, Assessor's Parcel Number 0275-191-02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive testimony, close the Public Hearing, and approve SA-05-06 and E-05-04 with Conditions. 3 i i I ADJOURN SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARDIPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CONVENE PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION • Information to Commissioners • Information from Commissioners ADJOURN PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION NEXT PLANNING_COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 16, 2005 I I I I I I i i i 4 Community and Economic Development I Department (ALIFORMIA p 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 (909) 824-6621 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: Thursday, May 19, 2005 SUBJECT: SA-05-06/E-05-04 applications for a Site and Architectural, and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: A 5.1 acre lot located at 21712 Vivienda Ave., Grand Terrace, CA. APN: 0275-191-02 RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and approve SA-05-06/E-05-04 with conditions. REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting the approval of a site and architectural review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. Section 18.63.020II of the Zoning Code requires the filing of a site and architectural review application for the development of an industrial site. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The Vacant residence at 21712 Vivienda Ave., Grand Terrace, CA. is a residence that is considered to be a legal non-conforming use. The General Plan designation for this site is Item 5 Industrial and the Zoning designation for this site is M2 Industrial. The properties directly to the north, east and west as well as south west are also zoned M2 Industrial. The properties farther east, are zoned R2 - Low Medium Density Residential and to the south the properties are R 1-7.2- Single Family Residential. The subject site fronts on Vivienda Ave but is approximately 60' to 70' feet below the road and is only accessible by an access easement off of Terrace Ave. GENRAL PLAN AND ZONING: This subject site is located in the Industrial category of the General Plan and is zoned M2 Industrial. The requested use to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home into an office and contractors storage yard at this location is consistent with both the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. i The surrounding area is also located in the Industrial category of the General Plan and is also zoned M2 Industrial with a small section zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential in a "LDR" category of the General Plan. i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Plan: The site plan consists of an existing single story, 1,350 square foot home, to be converted into an office. An existing barn, garage and several outbuildings, approximately 3,500 square feet, to be converted into material storage. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor storage and approximately 10,000 square feet of production. (Exhibit 1.0) Floor Plans: The proposed office conversion will consist of four offices, a waiting area, two restrooms, a break area and office storage. The storage buildings will remain in their present configuration. (Exhibit 2.0) Landscape Plan: The landscape plans show the existing trees to remain and some trees which may be removed. It also indicates the perimeter screening landscape. In addition to this landscape planters will be required for the parking area. (Exhibit 3.0) j Preliminary Drainage Plan: This lot sheet flow downward from south to north as shown on the S WPPP Plan. (Exhibit 4.0 & 5.0) Elevations: The elevations of the buildings will remain unchanged and are exhibited by existing photos. (Exhibit Photos Pages 1-9) REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: The following comments were reviewed by various local agencies with regard to this project: Building and Safety: Please refer to the comments made by the Director of Building and Safety/public Works in his memorandum of April 11, 2005 (Attachment B). City Engineer: No additional requirements or comments at this time. County of San Bernardino, Fire Department Community Safety Division: Additional conditions and fees may be imposed by the County of San Bernardino, Fire Department at the time of the plan check. Presently there are no comments as indicated by letter dated May 8, 2005(Attachment C). Riverside Highland Water Company_ Please refer to the comments made by Riverside Highland Water Company in their comments dated April 27, 2005 (Attachment D). South Coast Air Quality Management: Please refer to the comments made by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in there memorandum dated April 20, 2005(Attachment E). TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: The proposed project is subject to the'Circulation Improvement Fee Ordinance No. 190 adopted by the City Council on 2/24/2000. Both a Signal Improvement Fee and a Circulation Improvement Fee will have to be paid before the building permit will be issued. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project to convert an existing residence into an office in an industrial zone qualified for a Negative Declaration under the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the Negative Declaration and the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist with the mandatory findings of no impact for this project are attached hereto as Attachment F & G. FINDINGS: Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that the following findings be made by the Site and Architectural Review Board in approving this application: 1. The proposed project to convert an existing residence into an office is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the M2 Industrial zoning and the provisions of the City's General Plan, Industrial category. 2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated'with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures. They do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy. They do not unnecessarily block scenic j views from other structures and/or public areas, and they are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the proposed facility will be consistent with existing development in the area and the City. In addition, the site will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with any existing development along Vivenda Ave. 3. The architectural design of structures, their materials, and colors are visually harmonious with surrounding development and natural landforms; are functional for-the proposed project; and are consistent with the Industrial category and M2 Industrial zoning of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will be similar to existing materials and color styles of the existing residences in the area along Vivenda Ave. 4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the landscape of the area and nearby developments. The proposed landscaping of the site for this house will minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. There is some clearing of property and destruction of existing trees but no natural vegetation or excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides will occur. The natural beauty of the city is preserved. The subject site is an industrial parcel that has no natural resources. ' I 6. The design and locations of all signs associated with this project are consistent with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. All signs will be subject to a separate review through a required and separate sign permit. This is a single family residential project which will not require any special sign permits. 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None at this time. I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission on May 19, 2005. All plans will be consistent in terms of property lines, easement location and dimensions, and other measurements. Minor changes can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4 1 2. Street address shall be posted during construction and appropriate lighted address numbers shall be installed prior to final construction. 3. Pay all applicable development fees, park fees, and school impact fees. 4. Payment of the Traffic Signal and Circulation Improvement fees as established by Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into grading plans. 6. Appropriate dust control measures shall be taken for all driveways and access points during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Ave to the project site. 7. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:OOam to 8:00 pm. Monday thru Saturday. Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No Sunday construction will be allowed. 8. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 9. The proposed landscaping shall be shown on a landscaping/irrigation plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. Said landscaping/irrigation plan shall show plant types, spacing, numbers of plants, and sizes as well as irrigation facilities. Four copies of the landscaping/irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Installation of landscaping shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permit. Said plan shall include at least three Parking Lot Trees (15 gal) and low growing shrubs in a five foot wide landscape planter a minimum of 75 square feet. Perimeter planters as well as an end planter must for the parking area are required (18.60.040 E). Perimeter/Screening plants shall also be required for any adjacent properties to provide screening of the open storage yard. 10. Four copies of the lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Lighting shall be shielded away from nearby residential areas. 11. Four copies of the grading and paving plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 12. Any proposed fencing for the site shall comply with all applicable requirements and regulations of the City including the filing of a land use application and building permit, if needed. 13. All mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and shall be screened from public view. All HVAC units shall be located in the side yard behind solid side yard fencing or in the rear yard. No roof mounted HVAC units shall be allowed. 14. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Building and Safety/Public Works Department memorandum, dated April 11, 2005 15. Comply with all conditions that may be imposed by the County Fire Department at the 15 i I time of the plan check. 16. Submit four sets of construction plans for the office conversion of the residence to a commercial building. 17. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes. 18. Any construction activity occurring under this permit approval shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Storm Water System Ordinance (Ordinance No. 142, Subsection 1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the Clean Water Act. This site will need a NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County and plans. 19. Provide proof of any required Air Quality Management District permits or clearances prior to issuance of occupancy permit for any buildings on the site. 20. All debris and weeds shall be removed and kept clear from the office and storage buildings at all times. I 21. This grant shall not be deemed effective until the "Acceptance of Conditions" for Site and Architectural Review (SA) 05-06 has been signed by the applicant and returned to the City. I RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends the Grand Terrace Planning Commission make the seven findings of Zoning Code Section 18.63.060 (Site and Architectural Review, Approval Process)as shown on the attached Resolution and approve SA-05-06/E-05-04 subject to the conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted by, I I Jeff Gollihar Planning Technician ' I I Approved by, I Gary L: Koontz Community Development Director I Attachments Attachment A: Proposed Resolution with findings and conditions of approval Attachment B: Recommendations from Building and Safety/Public Works Attachment C: Letter from County of San Bernardino,Fire Department Attachment D: Letter from Riverside Highland Water Company Attachment E: Letter from South Coast Air Quality Management Attachment F: Negative Declaration Attachment G: Initial Study/Environmental for the Negative Declaration Attachment H: Water Quality Control Board Proof of Application Attachment I: Air Quality Management Proof of Application Attachment J: Manhole Builders Brochure Attachment K: Concrete Product Information Attachment L: Potential Production exhibits Attachment M: Letter of Intent Exhibit 1.0: Site Plan Exhibit 2.0: Floor Plans Exhibit 3.0: Landscape Plan Exhibit 4.0: Drainage/Topo Map Exhibit 5.0: SWPPP Plan Exhibit Photos 1-9: Existing Buildings Exhibit A: Aerial Photo Exhibit B: Assessor Parcel Map ,j RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING FILE NO. SA-05-06/E-05-04 APPLICATIONS FOR A SITE AND ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TO CONVERT AN EXISTING RESIDENCE INTO A COMMERCIAL OFFICE 21712 VIVIENDA AVE., GRAND TERRACE, CA. APN: 0275-191-02,IN A M2 INDUSTRIAL ZONING. WHEREAS, the applicant, Manhole Builders, applied for a Site and Architectural and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 square foot residence into an office as well as convert an existing barn,garage and several outbuildings into approximately 3,500 square feet of material storage warehouses in a M2 Industrial zone; and I WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May 19, 2005; WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guildlines,Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project qualified for a Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have no adverse impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05- 04; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, as follows: i The Planning ,Commission, after holding a public hearing and considering the proposed Site and Architectural and Environmental Review, makes the following findings: i Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that the following findings be made : Site and Architectural Review Board in approving this application: 1. The proposed project to convert an existing residence into an office is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the M2 Industrial zoning and the provisions of the City's General Plan, Industrial category. i 2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures.They do not Attachment A Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 2 of 4 interfere with the neighbors'privacy. They do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, and they are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the proposed facility will be consistent with existing development in the area and the City.In addition,the site will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with any existing development along Vivenda Ave. 3. The architectural design of structures, their materials, and colors are visually harmonious with surrounding development and natural landforms;are functional for the proposed project; and are-consistent with the Industrial category and M2 Industrial zoning of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will be similar to existing materials and color styles of the existing residences in the area along Vivenda Ave. 4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the landscape of the area and nearby developments. The proposed landscaping of the site for this house will minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. There is some clearing of property and destruction of existing trees but no natural vegetation or excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides will occur. The natural beauty of the city is preserved. The subject site is an industrial parcel that has no natural resources. 6. The design and locations of all signs associated with this project are consistent with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. All signs will be subject to a separate review through a required and separate sign permit. This is a single family residential project which will not require any special sign permits. 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None at this time. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission on May 19, 2005. All plans will be consistent in terms of property lines, easement location and dimensions,and other measurements.Minor changes can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-0-04 Page 3 of 4 2. Street address shall be posted during construction and appropriate lighted address numbers shall be installed prior to final construction. 3. Pay all applicable development fees,park fees, and school impact fees. 4. Payment of the Traffic Signal and Circulation Improvement fees as established by OrtEu= No. 190 of the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Appropriate dust control measures shall be integrated into grading plans. 6. Appropriate dust control measures shall be taken for all driveways and access points during hours of operation including the access easement from Terrace Ave to the project site. 7. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7:OOam to 8:00 pm. Monday thru Saturday. Municipal Code 8.108.040.D. No Sunday construction will be allowed. 8. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 9. The proposed landscaping shall.be shown on a landscaping/irrigation plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. Said landscaping/irrigation plan shall show plant types,spacing,numbers ofplants,and sizes as well as irrigation facilities.Four copies of the landscaping/irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Installation of landscaping shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permit. Said plan shall include at least three Parking Lot Trees (15 gal) and low growing shrubs in a five foot wide landscape planter a minimum of 75 square feet.Perimeter planters as well as an end planter must for the parking area are required (18.60.040 E). Perimeter/Screening plants shall also be required for any adjacent properties to provide screening of the open storage yard. 10. Four copies of the lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.Lighting shall be shielded away from nearby residential areas. 11. Four copies of the grading and paving plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. ' I 12. Any proposed fencing for the site shall comply with all applicable requirements and regulations of the City including the filing of a land use application and building permit, if needed. 13. All mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and shall be screened from public view. All HVAC units shall be located in the side yard behind solid side yard fencing or in the rear yard. No roof mounted HVAC units shall be allowed. 14. Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Building and Safety/Public Works Department memorandum, dated April 11, 2005 ., Planning Commission Resolution File No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Page 4 of 4 15. Comply with all conditions that may be imposed by the County Fire Department at the time of the plan check. 16. Submit four sets of construction plans for the office conversion of the residence to a commercial building. 17. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes. 18. Any construction activity occurring under this permit approval shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Storm Water System Ordinance(Ordinance No. 142,Subsection 1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control'Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the Clean Water Act. This site will need a NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County and plans. 19. Provide proof of any required Air Quality Management District permits or clearances prior to issuance of occupancy permit for any buildings on the site. 20. -This grant shall not be deemed effective until the "Acceptance of Conditions" for Site and Architectural Review(SA)05-06 has been signed by the applicant and returned to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,HEREBY APPROVES SA-05-06/E-05-04 BASED ON THE ABOVE FINDINGS. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace California at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of May 2005 by the following vote: 4 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson, City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission k RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO. 05-05, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 05-02 AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-03 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ! OF A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF j A 52 FOOT HIGH MONOPOLE DESIGNED TO RESEMBLE A PINE TREE WITHIN THE C2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT AND A SMALL 12' X 20' SQUARE FOOT STORAGE EQUIPMENT BUILDING AT 21893 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for the approval of Site and Architectural Review ! Case No. 05-05 and Conditional Use Permit Case No. 05-02 to construct a wireless i telecommunication facility as part of a network covering Southern California area consisting of a II 52 foot high monopole designed to resemble a pine tree and a small equipment building; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Thursday, May 19, 2005; and j WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project for a 52 foot high monopole designed to resemble a pine tree and small equipment storage building qualifies for a Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a•significant impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-03. NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY j OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal ! ; Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the Zoning Code and Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance and proposes the construction of a 52 foot high monopole designed to resemble a pine tree and small equipment building. ' 2. The proposed wireless communication facility which requires a conditional use j permit under City Ordinance No. 171 will not be: a. Detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the City of Grand Terrace because of the ! conditions which will be imposed on the development and operation of this i project. i b. Injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or City because of the ;conditions which have been imposed on the development and operation of this project. 3. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures,that they do not interfere with the neighbors'privacy,that the do not unnecessarily block scenic Y Y 1 ATTACHMENT 11 views from other structures and/or public areas,and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the wireless /telecommunication facility will be consistent with existing commercial and light industrial development in this area of the City. In addition, the site will be appropriately landscaped with additional trees to blend in with existing development and the proposed stealth design of the monopole as.a pine tree will minimize any adverse impacts to-scenic views in the area. 4. This telecommunication facility with its stealth design as a pine tree will be visually harmonious with surrounding development and natural landforms; is functional for the proposed project; and is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials and design will match and blend in with existing commercial and industrial areas. 5. The plan for landscaping of the facility provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the project and is harmonious with the natural landscape of the area and nearby commercial and industrial developments. The proposed landscaping and project design of the site will be minimize any visual impacts related to the proposed project. 6. Because the site has no natural vegetation and is not part of a hillside, there will be no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides. Thus the natural beauty of the city, its setting and natural landforms will be preserved. 7. There is adequate space on the property for the antenna, monopole and accessory wireless equipment building without conflict with existing buildings or other structures on the property or reducing required parking, landscaping or other development standards. 8. The design and placement of the antenna, monopole and accessory wireless equipment will not adversely impact the use of-the property, other building and structures located on the property, or the surrounding area or neighborhood. 9. The antenna, monopole and access and wireless equipment as proposed are consistent with the intention of this part of Ordinance No. 171 and comply with the General Standards for wireless telecommunication facilities and any Special Standards listed in Ordinance No. 171. 10. The proposed project does not proposed any signs and is therefore by default consistent with any and all sign regulations of the City. 11. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that SA-05-05 and CUP-05-02 are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed project shall be maintained in conformance with the plans and drawings submitted to the Community Development Department and approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 19, 2005. All plans shall be consistent in terms of property lines and other measurements. Minor changes or clarifications may be made by the Community Development Director at his discretion. 2 2. The monopole shall have a stealth design to resemble a pine tree as shown on Exhibit A-2. 3. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements in the memorandum dated April 11, 2005 from the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works. 4. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements as set forth in the letter dated May 9, 2005 from the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 5. Prior to the issuance of permits for this project by the Department of Building and Safety/Public Works, the applicant shall have obtained whatever clearances and permits are required from the appropriate State and Federal agencies including the Public Utility Commission of the State of California and the Federal Communication Commission. 6. An additional three trees, 24" box in size, shall be planted around the base of the monopole to make the facility look more natural. The specific species shall of a tree' or trees which will match as much as possible the appearance of the proposed stealth monopole/monopine. 7. If the modular building in front of the small 12'x 20' equipment building is removed for a period exceeding 6 months, the applicant shall install appropriate landscape screening on the westerly side of the 12'x 20'equipment building and at any other location as required by the Community Development Director to effectively screen the view of the equipment building from La Crosse. 8. Three landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted showing any proposed planting required by this approval. Said plans for the three required trees around the base of the monopole shall be approved prior to the issuance of any permits. 9. The proposed monopole with its stealth design as a pine tree shall not have any portions of it visible from the ground that are not painted or treated with natural colors. No shiny or bright colors shall be employed or be visible from the ground. 10. The proposed 12'x 20' equipment building/shelter shall be painted with earthtone colors. 11. The following conditions from the City's Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance No. 171 shall be complied with: a. The applicant shall agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City its officers, agent and employees from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City from its approval of a permit. b. A letter outlining the terms of the lease with the property owner shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the facility. If the lease is extended or terminated, notice and evidence thereof shall be provided to the Community Development Director. Upon termination or expiration of the lease, the use permit for the facility shall become null and void and the facility removed within 90 days. C. Certificate of continued use of each approved facility shall be submitted on a yearly basis at the time of business renewal for as long as the facility remains in operation. The certification shall indicate that the facility is operating as 3 approved and that the facility complies with the most current Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety standards. Facilities which are no longer in operation shall be removed within 90 days after the date of discontinuation. d. If no annual certification is provided, the use permit for the facility may be revoked by the Community Development Director. Prior to revoking a permit, the Director shall provide the owners of record written notice of their failure to provide the annual certification and an opportunity for hearing. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the facility, applicant may be required to provide a deposit with the City for removal of the facility and any accessory wireless equipment if such facility is found to be abandoned or the use permit is revoked by the Director. f. Notice of change of ownership of the facility shall be provided to the City. g. Within 90 days of commencement of operation, applicant shall provide a preliminary report and/or field report prepared by a qualified engineer that shows the operation of the facility is in conformance with the standard established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) for safe human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF)and radio frequency radiation (RFR). h, All changes and modifications to an approved facility shall require prior approval by the City. i. All graffiti and other forms of vandalism shall be promptly removed and/or repaired within 24 hours. 12. These conditions shall apply to the entire parcel at 21893 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace. PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe Planning Commission ofthe Cityof Grand Terrace,California, at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of May 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson, City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Michuelsjr\SA-05-01 CUP-05-01.resolution 4 I f I • Co1vIMUfy't 12-8.5402 ' `'T r MEMORANDUM GRAMD 7ERRAC TO: Jeff Gollihar, Planning Technician GH K FROM:; Jerry Glander, Director of Building and Safety/Public Works V DEPARTMENT OF. BUILDING & SAFETY,_ PUBLIC WORKS DATE: ' April 11, 2005 I AND HOUSING SUBJECT: SA-05-06/E-05-04 - 21712 Vivienda Ave. - Convert existing SFR 22795 Barton Road Suite B to office, etc. -Manhole Builders Grand Terrace California 923 1 3-5295 After project review and in compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Article Civic Center III,the following recommendations should be considered as conditions for the proposed (909) 825-3825 p j Fax (909) 825-7506 ro ect. 1. Provide the following: f A. Title report. B. Plot plan. C. Plans for structures to be altered. 2. Show any recorded easements on plot plan. 3. Pay all plan check,permit& inspection fees.. 4. Pay all public works,capital improvement, maintenance, circulation and traffic improvement fees. ! 5. All improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California Business and Professions j Code,which shall comply with all applicable requirements of 2001 California Building Code,2001 California Electrical Code,2001 California Plumbing Code, 2001 California Mechanical Code,American Disabilities Act,Title 24 California Energy Requirements, Grand Terrace Municipal Code and NPDES. 6. Remove all trees and shrubs along Vivienda Avenue. I I ! I Attachment B i 7 . ii Communizy"and Economic uevelapment (d L I f 0&N l d Department 22795 Barton Road G-r and Terrace California 92313-5295 (909) 824-6621 APR 0 6 2e05 DATE: Apri14,2005 COUNTY F)RE DEPARTMENT FE E NTO. SA-05-06IS-05-04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS APPLICANT: Manhole Builders LOCATION: A 5.1 acre lot located at 21712 Ave., Grand Terrace, CA. APN: 0275-191-02 PROJECT: SA-05-06/E-05-04 applications for a Site and Architecture, and Environmental Review to convert an existing single story, 1,350 y square foot home into an office as well as convert an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage. Dear Reviewing Agency: The above referenced application is on file with the Grand Terrace Community Development Department. Please submit any comments your agency may have regarding this application by Wednesday, May 11, 2005, to the attention of Jeff Crollihar, Planning Technician, Community Development Department,22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace,CA 92313. UTILITY COMPANIES: No input is necessary unless y u have existing rights of ways or easements at this location. / Sinccrel � `'i l.T/"' r Jeff Gollihar / Planning Technician Enclosure: Project Maps Arial photo Attachment C 7nA/7" „CC n$ y�G�5 p LAN+ Ir �. 1450 E.Washington St. Colton, CA 92324-4696 (909) 825-4128 FAX(909) 825-1715 9•�C� a'ER V At10 O,A[ FuR i V-V P Z D)LIE G�' April 27, 2005 APR 2 F) 2005 f t�/!lCNELLE F. mOL►STEDT Planning/Community Mr. Jeff Gollihar servicps = r rtmen{ Planning Technician City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Re: Applications for Site and Architecture No. SA-05-06/E-05-04 Dear Mr. Gollihar; I would like to thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above referenced project. i Riverside Highland Water Company has a domestic water well directly to the east, within 1,000 feet of the proposed project. The city of Riverside also has water wells in the area. It appears that the project calls for the use of concrete mixtures as well as the construction of a wastewater collection area. We would appreciate any information you or the applicant may have on these items, i including the MSDS sheets on the material being handled at the site. In addition, we will need to work with the applic:;rit on possible meter sizing, backflow devises and fees. Thank you. Sincerely, Don Hough General Manager DJH/ss Attachment D q South Coast Air Quality Management District - r x: 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 d: .•�' ibis.'; , -- ;; (909) 396-2000 - www.agmd.gov April 20,2005 Mr. Jeff Gollihar,Planning Technician City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department _ 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 Dear Mr. Gollihar, RP,ently, the South Coast Air Quallity Mgna^ement Distnct (SCAQMD) D) intergovernmental review section (IGR) received Site and Architecture, and Environmental Review SA-05-06/E-05-04 for the proposed conversion of some existing structures into approximately 5,000 square feet of office and material storage warehouse space in addition to approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage. Please note that the function of the SCAQMD IGR section is to review California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, i.e. initial studies,negative declarations, environmental impact reports or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)documents for proposed projects. This letter constitutes a request for you to refrain from sending plot plans or similar maps unless they are also accompanied by a CEQA or NEPA document. Please send me a copy of the CEQA document for the proposed project when it is completed. The SCAQMD staff is happy to work with the City to address any questions that may arise in the CEQA process for the proposed project regarding air quality issues. If you have any questions,please contact me at (909) 396-3054 if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely Steve Smith, Ph.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Planning, Rule Development &Area Sources SS:GM Attachments: Copy of Transmittal Form for SA-05-06/E-05-04. RVC050414-01 Control Number 1 Attachment E i t4�TAr �- PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Document Type: Negative Declaration Date: April 28, 2005 Project Title: SA-05-06, and E-05-04 Project Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue (Approximately 5.04 acre parcel located on the north side of Vivienda Avenue west of Terrace Avenue. This site was a legal nonconforming residence in the past.) Description of Project: The project will consist of the conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. Project Proponent: Manhole Builders Lead Agency: Community Development Department, City.of Grand Terrace Contact Person: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director (909)430-2247 Public Review Period: Began:Thursday, April 28, 2005 Ended: May 19, 2005 i Public Hearings/Meetings: Planning Commission—Thursday, May 19, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. i Environmental Finding: Based on an Initial Study,attached hereto, prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of approving SA-05-06 and E-05-04, the said project qualifies for a Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Signature: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director Attachment F City of Grand 'Terrace Community Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-06, and Environmental Review Case No. 05-04 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: GaryL.Koontz,Community Development Director or Jeff Gollihar, Planner Technician (909) 430-2247 4. Project Location: 21712 Vivienda Avenue (Approximately 5.04 acre parcel located on the north side of Vivienda Avenue west of Terrace Avenue. This site was a legal nonconforming residence in the past.) 5. Project Sponsor's Name Manhole Builders 6. General Plan Designation: Industrial 7. Zoning: "M2"(Industrial) 8. Description ofProject:The project will consist of the conversion of an existing single story, 1,350 square home into an office for a manhole production and installation company. This project will also consist of the conversion an existing barn, garage and several outbuildings into approximately 5,000 square feet of material storage warehouses. There will also be approximately 70,000 square feet of outdoor production and storage for a construction yard. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: North: M2 Industrial vacant lot near a flood plain East: M2 Industrial with a legal nonconforming residence South: 7 R1-7.2 Single Family Residential West: M2 Industrial vacant lot near a flood plain 10. Other agencies whose approval is required(e.g.,permits,financing approval,orparticipation agreement) City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety—building and grading permits; County of San Bernardino Fire Department—plan check review and approval;County of San Bernardino Fire Department-Haz Met Division; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region Community Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Attachment G i Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics ❑Recreation ❑ Water ❑Utilities and Services Systems ❑ Hazards ❑Air Quality ❑Noise = ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation (To be completed by the Lead Agency): ■ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an i attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. i ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. /7 Si re Date Gary L. Koontz Community Development Director faiL Printed Name Title Community Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, `Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVH at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Community Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated (Source: General Plan Categories Map; Zoning District Map; Industrial and M2 Industrial) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 'b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (There are no known agencies where the proposed project would cause a conflict. ) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (Zoning District Map, M2 Industrial, City Zoning Code) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant agricultural resources in Grand Terrace) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or minority community)? (The site is relatively small and is vacant. It will not divide any portion of the community. ) A brief explanation to answer I: The proposed is consistent with the City's General Plan and the existing zoning designation on the site. Various agencies were asked to comment on the proposed project. No agency indicated that the proje( conflicts with any applicable environmental laws. The project will be designed to be compatible with trie existing lands uses in the vicinity. In addition, the site has been developed as an auto service station for a number of years. II.'Population and Housing. Would the proposal: i a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ population projections? (no) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (no) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 housing? (no ) Ai brief explanation to answer II: The proposed project is relatively small in size. The zoning of this site has been commercial for a number of years. Population projections for the City and region have taken into consideration the existing zoning of this site. No major extensions of infrastructure will be required to construct this project. . IIII Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General Plan MEA/EIR- ES-4) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ i Community Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues,(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Seismic ground-shaking?(GP MEA/EIR-II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (GP ❑ ❑ O ■ MEA/EIR- II-1) d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEA/EIR II-I) 0 0 0 f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) g) Subsidence of the land? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, Append ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ h) Expansive soil? (GP MEA/EIR II-I, Append B-4) El I) Unique geologic or physical features? (GP MEA/EIR 01 ❑ ❑ ■ II-1) A brief explanation to answer III: No known geological hazards exist on this site or the nearby vicinity. In addition, a soils report will be required before the issuance of a grading permit or building permits for this project for a service station. IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR II-1 Append B) b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ such as flooding? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ body? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ movements? () f) Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of ❑ ❑ El an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (GP MEA/EIR II- g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, Community Development Department 5 'Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless - Impact Mitigation Incorporated and 97 Regional WCA Report) >) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR H-1) A brief explanation to answer IV: The proposed project is to construct of a completely new auto service station and car wash.. Before grading permits are issued for this project all NPDES requirements will have to be met which should ensure that many of the impact to water resources will be eliminated. In addition, all water for the use of this project will be provide by the local water provider, the Riverside Highland Water Company. In 4 addition, there is a 48"r.c.p. storm drain along Barton Road in front of the site. V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ existing or projected air quality violation? (GP MEA/EIR II-14, and AQMP) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ contains an implementing action to reduce such exposure) c) Alter air movement,moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ r any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ proposals are included in the Element) brief explanation to answer V: The proposed project is relatively small in size, at least on a regional scale. No impacts to air quality are expected to result from the development of this new service station. In addition, the appropriate permits will be required from the AQMD. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Trans. ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Engineering and Planning Consultant) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e,) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (TCM Ordinance 147) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative El ❑ ❑ ■ transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (TCM j Ordinance 147) Community Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? () ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Brief explanation to answer VI: The proposed project is to has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. He concluded that because of its relatively small size that a traffic study would not be required. In addition, the existing driveways to. the site will not be changed and will not create any additional or new traffic hazards. VII. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP MEA/EIR.U-20,Append C) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR U-20) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (GP MEA/EIR U-20) Brief explanation to answer VII: The rare or endangered species are known to live in the urban areas of Grand Terrace. In addition, there are no desirable large trees on the site or wetland habitats. No adverse impacts to biological resources are ,expected from the development of this project. II. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-19, and Append D) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (GP MEA/EIR H-19, and Append B) Brief explanation to answer VIII: , No mineral resources have been identified in the City. Therefore the development of the proposed new auto service station will not adversely impact any mineral resources. In addition, the project will have to be constructed in compliance with the energy standards of the building code. Community Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i i • i Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ chemicals, or radiation)? (GP MEA/EIR II-7) b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (GT Emergency Plan, and GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-13) :c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ hazard? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) tl d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ health hazards? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (GP MEA/EIR II-6) Brief explanation to answer IX: There are no known hazards on the site or the immediate surrounding area. In addition, the new auto service station will have to comply with all applicable regulations of both the State, County and AQMD. X. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? (GP MEA/EIR II-10) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-10) Brief explanation to answer X. The site is located next to the I-215 Freeway which is one of the greatest noise generators in the City. The proposed car-wash should not significantly add to the ambient noise level for the area. Also, the car-wash Will be located on the rear of the site behind the new building. Finally, there are no nearby residential sites. XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection?-( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Police protection? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Schools? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Other governmental services? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Brief explanation of answer XI. The proposed project for the auto service station is relatively small in size. The site has been used as a service station for a number of years. No additional levels of public services are anticipated from this project. In Community Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated addition, various local agencies including the Fire Department, Sheriff and Colton Unified School District were sent notices regarding this project. . XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (GP MEA/EIR II-32, II-33) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Communications systems? (GP MEA/EIR II-33) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ ■ facilities? (GP MEA/EIR II-30) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP MEA/EIR II-30) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Storm water drainage? (GP MEA/EIR II-33) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ f) Solid waste disposal? (GP MEA/EIR II-32) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ g) Local or regional water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR II-30) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Brief explanation of answer XII. Various notices regarding this project were sent to public utility companies. No negative responses were received. The Riverside Highland Water Company indicated that they would work with the developer to service the site. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Create light or glare? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ Brief explanation to answer XIII. The proposed project does not lie near scenic highway or will block scenic vistas. In addition, the project will employ an architectural style and features to make it an attractive project. Conditions will be imposed to ensure that the project is developed with these features. XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (GP MEA/EIR II- ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 20) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (GP MEA/EIR II- ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 20) c) Affect historical resources?, (GP MEA/EIR II-22) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (GP MEA/EIR II-22) Community Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ potential impact area? ( ) Brief explanation to answer XIV. No known palentological, archaeological or historical resources exist on the site. No cultural values or sacred uses will be impacted by this project. The site has been developed as an auto service station for a numbe years. XV. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ or other recreational facilities? (GP MEA/EIR II-21) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-21) Brief explanation to answer XV. The proposed project is non-residential; it will not increase the demand for recreational service in the community. In addition, the site has been used as an auto service station for a number of years. XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ❑ ❑ cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Community Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Signitcant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answers XVI. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is relatively small,just over one-half of an acre. The auto service station will be a heavily regulated use of the site with permits required from the EPA, State, AQMD and County. In addition, the site has been used as a auto service station for a number of years. XVII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR, or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion.should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses.and state where they are available for review. ■ Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within,the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. ■ Not Applicable c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"/describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. ■ Not Applicable Grand Terrace Community Development Deptment Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 2-1083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sunstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, 22 Cal.App.3d 1337 (1990) I Community Development Department 11 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis CaliforniaRegional Water g. Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region erry Tamminen 3737 Main Street,Suite 500,Riverside,Califomia Secretary for (909)782-4130-Fax(909)781-6288 Environmental ® http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb8 �� Arnold Sc emoenec Protection + r, �LI v � r DOCUMENT RECEIPT,` q ' Z Received from: ( ti'� l�.,Q (Company name and/or Messenger) Type of Document: 1 0 No PPPS i Date Received: R ce ved by: i I i I • i Attachment H i.ln'}'y}ItM_rt South Coast j I r Air Quality Management District � 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar CA 91765- (909) 396-2000 Date: 03/31/05 03:23 PM Receipt Nbr: C40434 Facility: C�1 MANHOLE BUILDERS, INC. Location Address: 1712 VIVIENDA AVENUE City: GRAND TERRACE State: CA zip: 92313 — a Check nbr. Amount Check Nbr. Amount Cash: $.00 1551 1$3,212.32 r I 1s.00 $.00 $.00 5.00 $.00 5.00 Is.00 $.00 Is.00 Total: 1$3,212.32 Comments: (4) PERMIT APPLICATIONS - NEW Received By: AQMD Cashier Cashier Signature: Original Copy Attachment I Partial List of Services Office D ana genlent Provided We would like to take this opportunity to Our office management is headed by Mark in • Standard Sewer Manholes the scheduling department, and Cathy in the introduce ourselves. Manhole Builders, Inc., previously known as PMI, has estimating and accounting 'department. rightfully earned the reputation for being • S-36 Type Manholes They are ready to fill your needs in a professional and efficient manner. We take dependable and for furnishing superior pride in being able to accommodate your workmanship. This is no doubt due to the Metering Manholes work schedule, and in keeping our prices fact that we take good old-fashioned pride • very competitive. in the quality of our work, which has Safety Manholes ensured us with a repeat customer base, • PVC Manhole Lining founded primarily on referrals. We have enjoyed a smooth running business with • Drop Manholes Our Precast Supplier safety as a number one priority. • Monitoring Manholes r We install Southwest Concrete - o Siphon Manholes �':' ;r:'A Products, known for their quality About our Owners ."v�� and service; a leading manu- facturer since 1966. We are proud of the family tradition we've continued to this day. The President of -�' '•=' i . '--• our company is Eddie Jaureguy, a third generation manhole builder. His father, .,a ,a3 j - s'C"s+ �: p,,: A Ed recentlyretired fit ' r�,,.' �,�., .r.::<::.• with over 45 years ,,1,-„ ,,,; .,;��;,� ��„ .� ,;�1�.•.�r•,;.�;�w,{;,��,,;;:;;.;,. ..�,.;,�;:�w-:.� fence ill ,experience constructing manholes, back g ;,,><<•.;-.�:r?.��' �; r , .� >R; •., .� spanning to the days of brick �w=F�'� °r' °-`'` '�` • build ' n-law, ;�r. \.n.. ., -:i-=,. M . manhole in Eddie sbrother-i �'� ��.,':� � f•.=•' ._.. �- . l,. �» :�;..� F° Marls H g• J• �,.',��., ,,t,w �:•' k�:�.,:;: undley is Vice-President, and is i:�' •, �,tt.x..,f.: �-�5.�• �° � k �t.•,;� happy to have his son Greg, a fourth ',�• a;^.�''��:` fix, �'� '"""':" � r,. generation hole builder, atiou man ,�z ��,'•,.1 _ „a� •`..,� g ,working for us out 1 Cathy NF:cr.;��.�.�a.�! n the field. y J aureguy has been �r ��: "•��>�.;.��;;�s�3� .,,.,:.:.,�'•� �, �;�•� '� :,,f,: .� with our familybusiness since the -'�,•�+e y�....,�•'.< :i�, � ��`::,. �r' ;� �<:;;^�-�,r ';� �;�.;r+�'-,.: ?,. . � •+ � ��. � , :.� ,,.:z.,..,� beginning of our PMI days and is our 4 '. 4 Secretary CFO. All three owners enjoy a '.; �;:..;':��,'�°+`tN.�- '• n^r•• ,a.e'•: ' D Flume-for metering manhole �:E''°``{'k'y� 1.•• combined total of over 70 years in the ;.' : ';, ''' "'r ,` 11n�� .• '+.li.{nW J.y'Y"� e�A.'i'IY.q��HIY•111 5 manhole business. 1 ' D _ 7 —1 ' Contractors & Some of our Projects Developers - We are proud to say that we have enjoyed • California State-Prison, Lancaster many loyal relationships with contractors • Ontario Mills Mall in our business, some that have spanned over 25 years. Please take note of just a 0 Disneyland Improvements sample of our extensive resume of pipeline 5021 Stone Avenue contractors and developers. LA County Fairground Improvements Riverside, CA 92509 • Long Beach Town Center Phone (951) 681-0601 ® Babco Construction - Fax (951) 681-0608 • Ontario Airport S.J. Burkhardt, Inc. 40 Frito Lay, Ontario ® C W General Contracting �;r', •` -.�• • ��"�` --• •� ' Stanley Yelich, Inc. S�''r'' ® KB „4;ii n w Homes • =��f � � '�c�t��,,.,•, �':Y1*.:': .�w ' � +;,�.�; Lewis Development `�. y �:"-' ,;�; �•,• -' �N•tiF� '+.. ; `3"J~: :{�"•,%rVy'Y, yam;-YN _ . �' P4'►�, ;r: �L.t `P,✓`r�s.;yJl �, .. 4 i .±'gin:? "'yJy. Centex Homes �.: ' •,� •'ti.-c�..,.;,..t ��s,r ��;�� . . ..;>;, -1,: K. Hovnanian .' .,,h :4't�r•�}Y� a :',i'.S,'-•'� ...1, �'^� ��"S!!.s• s �. . ,' .A•.r '�: :. :.Y;tik:+v;`+.:f°.d,;. .�. }ir,nl�., ; �N '"ice.^ Van Daele Development Lennar x:; •j.�:;'...., �..:..,.; �s,c� ; Homes. '�...;�{;w, ,�. �.;,;,;,,.�••:.,,::...�: . ��.'•:fT' 9� iY7'?R\Y9'$..•f�'G4• rX�11i,,.+fi"ice.^., � 1,...:1, Coil Constructors �. .'• :: °;.,;. '' .•`;+a.N r Tilden ® Fullmer Construction *Manhole Builders services all water Oltmans Construction Company = districts in the Southern California License No. 831892 area.* I I . I i I F I I I ' C P R O D U C T I ' N F O R M A T 1 O N I i AD RCast 500 i High Range Water-Reducing Admixture ASTM C 494, Type F ADVA ADVA®Cast 500 is a high range water-reducing admixture specifically formulated for precast I applications.It is a low viscosity ,�r.,,: liquid,which is ready to use as I _%�:i�y:. .t~ ��`.�.T.- `i dt'��ii.i�o��r�,�~-:,.:'��JC•47:'�.: �'ti;y:Yi: received. ADVA Cast 500 is ^Fl�'•w" r..�•yjyj�-•ii __ �[v�:j-fi.TC:�3�r�`�y.,�i.v��'•ti�t - 9 manufactured under closely controlled conditions to provide uniformpredictable perforinahce I and is formulated to comply with specifications for Chemical ,-r4:: _ �;,.:�,° Admixtures for Concrete .ASTM 4 C 494 as a T DesignationYe FP .�..:'"-.,•�;;:.. •�;: - :.. _ admixture. ADVA Cast 500 contains no intentionally added calcium chloride. Supplied as an ' amber colored liquid, one liter .; weighs approximately 1.05 kg (one gallon weighs approximately 8.7 lbs). ADVA Cast 500 is specifically • ADVA Cast 500 concrete formulated to enhance the set surface finishes with reduced ADVA Cast 500 high range water time and early strength bug holing. reducer(Superplasticizer)produces development of concrete. ADVA Cast 500 concrete even concrete with extremely workable at high slump, exhibits no characteristics referred to as high significant segregation in slump, flowing concrete. It also • ADVA Cast 500 can be used to comparison to concrete allows concrete to be produced' reduce energy requirements of without a superplasticizer at with very low water/cement ratios external heat for accelerated the same slump. for high strength. curing. • ADVA Cast 500 is highly ADVA Cast S00 is ideal for ADVA Cast 500 concrete efficient,producing a high slump applications where it is desired to produced with Type I cement concrete at a low dosage rate. keep the water/cement ratio to a may be substituted for concrete ADVA Cast 500 is added to minimum and still achieve the produced with Type III cement concrete mix water for rapid degree of workability necessary to to achieve early release batching. provide easy placement and strengths. adequate consolidation. Attachment K Construction Products P R O D U C T N F O R M A T 1 0 N PolarSet . Non-Corrosive, Non-Chloride Set Accelerating Admixture ASTM C 494, Type C PolarSet®is a non-corrosive,non- i . chloride admixture for concrete.' ' It accelerates cement hydration =_l resulting in shortened setting times and increased early com- pressive strengths. U. Rif �y`- •'-a. 4C.-• �'i1: fyp-ls .F.r_i.: _ __ - y ef 1 PolarSet does not contain calcium - ':.'. chloride and is completely non- corrosive to reinforcing steel, metal decks, and to all metal com- ponents of your admixture stor- age and dispensing system.It is formulated to comply with ASTM C 494 Type C and can be used at any dosage to comply with ACI For conditions not subject to be avoided. It can also be used in 318 guidelines for chloride con- freezing,PolarSet may be used to concrete that is to be placed on tent of concrete. One Liter of speed finishing operations and/or steel clad or zinc coated steel PolarSet weighs approximately form removal, leading to savings decks where corrosion must be 1.35 kg (11.25 lbs/gal). in concrete construction costs. similarly avoided. PolarSet is specially formulated to PolarSet provides set time acceler- In concrete mixes,PolarSet accel- reduce concrete setting times and ation and early strength develop- erates the chemical reaction - increase early strengths for con- ment similar to that provided by between portland cement and crete in very cold conditions, and calcium chloride, but without the water. It speeds up.the formation may be used to reduce the time potential corrosive effects. of gel—the binder that bonds that concrete must be protected PolarSet can, therefore, be used concrete aggregates together. against freezing in ambient tem- where potential corrosion of Accelerated'gel formation in turn peratures as low as -70C (200F). embedded or stressed steel must shortens the setting time of con- GRACE Construction Products d _ i I P R O D U C T N F O R M A T 1 O N ' e Uaravair' 1000 Air-Entraining Admixture ASTM C 260, AASHTO M 154 Daravair® 1000 is a liquid air-entraining admixture that,, provides freeze-thaw resistance, ,.•' h .3s.- yield control, and finishability performance across the full range of concrete mix designs. Daravair - 1000 is a clean, light-orange product designed to generate l.,± specification-quality air systems. Based on a high-grade saponified .'' r rosin formulation,Daravair 1000 r� = is chemically similar to vinsol- based products, but with _ increased purity and supply dependability. i Daravair 1000 air-entraining ;L fir' • _ admixture may be used wherever the purposeful entrainment of air is required by concrete specifica- • High Cement Factor the concrete.This can permit a tions. Formulated to perform • Fly Ash and Slag reduction in mixing water with no across the entire spectrum of • Superplasticizers loss of slump. Placeabiliry is production mixes,Daravair 1000 • Manufactured Sands improved. Bleeding, plastic generates quality,freeze-thaw shrinkage and segregation are resistant air systems in concrete minimized. conditions that include the Air is incorporated into the con- following: crete by the mechanics of mixing Through the purposeful entrain- and stabilized into millions of di ment of air, Daravair 1000 • Low Slump s-Crete semi-microscopic bubbles in markedly increases the durability • Paving ' the presence of a specifically of concrete to severe exposures • Central Mix particularly to freezing and thaw- • Extruded SlipForm designed air-entraining admixture such as Daravair 1000 These air ing.It has also demonstrated a • Mixes Containing H .Hot Water remarkable ability to impart resis- and Accelerators bubbles act much like flexible ball bearings increasing the mobility, tance to the action of frost and ® Precast deicing salts as well as sulfate, sea or plasticity and workability of and alkaline waters. GRACE Construction Products t� ' Bu - k B I A 'goft t h I t ;t11 a d[r ++ 1 [ et:" a it h F ��•��. y�• OVA -- { -r :s t.•s` E .r 4 RE� wg- v if � tr Fr, r � l rr• r F 2. � = rt �� 1 L t x • .Y•'4'�w'}'�ii k_f.2� -v-r� 3 T1RJ �r - ♦ iY4 WO t 3 i �` • • • 1 } . �cs n F P ` irQucts ucts '� r. t orida, Inc �D lYIENSIONS: Description Model-2000 Batch-Mixer Model-2000 Batch-Mixer & Silo Model-2000 S Overall Length 24'-0" w/Auger 52'-0" w/Auger ' Width 8'-4" 8'-4" 8'-6" Diamete j Height 10'-8" 10'-8"/ 10'-10" 22'-0" et-Up Area/Square Foot 200/SF 433/SF 100/SF* I >`(Mixer w/round Silo - 500SF) 1nGjt;( S qb -AMP CAPACITIES: PRODUCTION: Aggregate Bins - 343 cubic feet Production Rate - 20 - 24 cubic yards per hour of 5.5 Bag Mix Ba,clier Cement Bin - 57 cubic feet STIANDARD EQUIPMENT: ' 13 6L. Yd. Aggregate Bins Product Counter 12 ft. Dual Action Mixing Au El �ctiic Auger Winch 220 V 3 ph Electric Drive Motors Aux. Admix Power Outlets Co trol Panel w/Main Disconnect Pressure Regulated Water System Cement Level Sight Windo-, Skid Mounted for Portability ONIONS: I Ce ent Hopper Level Indicator 180' Auger Swivel Liquid Admix System 'r:a'ei3"3�"'a�.:�(:�?ro��_�.c '''✓�'�v� Ask Us We have the knowledge, experience, & equipmer. that will answer all of your mixing needs. RRI 4. c.-r.r.. •.'yi may' .y+-r. ..r' _ c/ •f.i i:?^N.".G' - I�r.2 '`'•,^''f •;,•{,...:ue...f The!Del-�otto-2003 Silo / Batch-Mixer/ Bucket all are designedf to keep pace with your growing business... Nile are,continually seeking to improve all Del Zotto Products.,Toward that end we reserve the right to change prices and specifications without notiA ©20Q0-2003 Del Zotto.Products will litigate all participants in infringements on Patents,Patents Pending,Copyrights,and Proprietary Information. lx�P l�rr�t iN t'I^�}viO�M.ri�ti4 tl'�III `st tiJlilr i�utY: lJ ( t rr t �, {tlhrNtf11 �GKt ytv 4ty:l yi'v a{rZlitr,+lrl3 it ! 1 ti - r> �.t ^ g � Ater , y714h" s,yySJ.�` ,I jy''41t'�f11Vlf I�y 1u�Vr�,}��liflxR�fr f't'rf1Y at 1 tit;�{qt�1>�t{X.Fyk tafrr rt rJ'8 W. fi 1 V YY{gNs�r�,y�,, r5 Yl,�t f��F7 ylf1 ��t ntNY��I.)Cir�'�?''z� t�,�l,��i"t'u•+r+I A.Z rH ,�Y,y ''l't'Fnt I Iv � t'� Y u t ,,�4{ I w.s� n,. xvi�. t• 1 , 7�: t t, , �� I Ys.l4r r 1vNl"'bA,t rY kS.2+i�"r��1.3'+�r• ft t 4� I�f t r �wf 2� w�,tw'x, t 1 Ft,l, Y`s ? Y:y'l/t'il !sl r;rL�l � � t�.r f. t^a 1 ♦ rr e � y F �"Rs lrJl..b yr,"7'v �K I tr�S GL`i m" pit I i lJ:l��pQ{ i . q ti�4 ? )3 s�tyairixft�jt, y� +o-f5tiq, 4 I NNW 449 u ri i,yn TM g43l>tag Hs J ��71,6�Jlyty �-IL it 1�d 4r + Y Isf, � �� sir L Yfn r'�r�'11 N '?� •�.v �iu'k�l igi, y�.v6PY a01g'+o.a aP",1,..6c�7mas, on" 1 rEj :Y)s'� r t Af:1 eN,�'y� i{!ti fSr11a 1�+vrr y}� Lry`� �`•,ry1 { �"M rl P t�.'M 1°t:7�v.��,� L r/1 9'S�.r •,�"�` x �war !� ' � x �yv'tJJ+ •e i 7,: '��`� :It �I„'Ya�A'/tT�,.y4;�� 11}��r .•�%; k+ti I'{ r t fiJ��7 h�,V �{ „der i r � �. aq.yT�+':ram.`. - ;• ��. Tp If vy --- 6 PRECAST STORAGE AREA , I i I . I • INIANHOLE BUILDERS s r' t,. eca as ca......c..a4Laia..J.4..a:a.a:aala::acac:lti Lt.l...a..._...La aiatlaiiv:'tlaY'vl:ataislYSicGCSlaSeaaSaai:iSaav:YslatlaatapYaaaiaLY:::6iS::::ttliailc aiaauafaSSaaa:a__._ea:acava Sclii:aYJe�cc�i aasa:aiY:ta Oacaia:cap2 5021 Stone Avenue • Riverside, CA 92509 (a51) 681-0601 Fax: (951) 681-0608 March 31, 2005 City of Grand Terrace Planning Division 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Re: Requested Letter of Intent To Whom It May Concern: We would like to take this opportunity to introduce ourselves. Manhole Builders, Inc. is the result of four generations of hard work in the sewer contracting business, specializing in manhole installation. The three owners have a combined total of over 70 years in the business. Our success in the industry has now made it possible to expand into the manufacturing of the product we have been installing all these years. By cutting out the middle man, we will have more control over the service we can provide to our contractors, and product availability. Please see the accompanied brochure to get further insight into our company's history. The manufacturing of the precast manholes is a simple production process. It begins with the pouring of concrete each morning into metal manhole forms that have been wire reinforced. Mid-afternoon,when the concrete dries, the forms are removed and another set of manholes are poured for the day, stripped the next morning, and the process continues. The finished precast is then removed by a loader from the outdoor production area and transferred to the storage area. A boom truck will load and deliver to our installation crew in the field once or twice a day. We have provided pictures of the type of truck and loader we will be using, as well as, the concrete'mixer used in the production process. The admixtures we use in the concrete ensure the needed strength of the concrete, as well as the required drying and curing time. OSHA specs are enclosed. None of the admixtures are considered to be hazardous materials according to the EPA. We would like to ensure you that we are working closely with all Water Quality Control and Air Quality Control boards in order to conform to required permitting processes and pollution prevention planning. Enclosed you will find our completed permit applications. We are receiving assistance from the Water Quality Control Board's representatives with our SWPPP program. Our company is excited that we found property in the city of Grand Terrace, and we look forward to working successfully in your city for many years to come. Thank you for your time and attention to the review of our project plans. Sincerely, Stacy ureguy Project Coordinator Manhole Builders, Inc. (909) 997-0900 (909) 467-2383 FAX Attachment M fia, VMM-1- q7 TT Nil 49 IF v.� lop it" W�N TO I I ON,, Me Ni tj 0,� �q Igo .4 1:j! w U t 4)�.k If u Uj Y[W 1, H..*s�MR, E NWIS ,.TIM, 7-:.� Fi- �i F4* oi�UR Hor. Honcho ion tiernordrtlb, M.,.B. 7/2;•' ' 275— j c Por. Jurupo Rancho,M.B. I/47 Grand Terrace City Colton -City s_ _ _ _ Colt-o-n -Jt: U..ni.f►e.d `,•,: Tax Rate 2008',2009,64,050, 160011 , 2083,2O4I",.I600I (rey3•�7�c PING 41 pJll yP��SgG�Op, o � CJ N N 5, ' - M � I ORQ•I' •� �— = S.B.C.F.C.D.co �a tea. - r` •r 163 Por_ Lot 3 18 5ESSED ON '163-361-13 O R •8- OR.MAP 604-36=93F,PAR.NO.13 ti 26:25AG MA M ASSESSED ON PAGE 22 4 AP 2.D CITY PAAR.R.N MO.O. 15 8 � /.35•AC � .�s�.6 53 g9s. srm.Z� o TCA PAR. 2.96 AC. •RPAD 4 TCA 16001 m ' 91 „E„ 39 M/L , 2ie.�y•« v .M UO• " \�All v 1564AC.MA A�0 12' 4O O34 htJ`• a O Por. Lot 39 13.5 AC, MIL • f 30 -+ Pon Lot 4 48 P872-36-22c MAP 408-36-33 PAR.NO..12 PAR. 1 35 �P �ass Q 12AGMIL ^- MAP 148-36-25,PAR.NO.4_ !� O ao V Q a 4.6AC to 7oG.B Sipa� 7 1:43AC 43 31 30 2 0 ZOA% 4.6 AG S.I AC GP O� :2.02 AC. S 57 �� MA �� ® MAP 408-36-33 PAR 2 U R.S.8 2 55 3.52 AC. �� 55 'MAP 872-36-22F PAR. 19 ~ IV A �' 49 o _ - 28 15 - 2AG 6'q REVISED 6/27/77 l MAP 872-36-22F PAR.N0.18 54 . �GF 7%17/78 22 r Assessor's Mop Note-Assessor's.Blk.a Loy Book 275, Page 19 6-4-79 E Numbers Shown in Circles 23 San Bernardino Count 5/2/94 RF 4/5/OI Gh r Exhibit B N�LaiNWN�NYYaNYY� YjbNtiuYuwuibNNbuYYYYYjuWN1YiYjYYNYYYYYWaNaNtijWYMNYUWW�WNiHYYWWIYYYYYYa•jNYYNYY•WWu 5021 Stone Avenue • Riverside,CA 92509 (951) 681-0601 Fax: (951) 681-0608 March 31,2005 City of Grand Terrace Planning Division 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92313 Re: Requested Letter of Intent I To Whom It May Concern: We would like to take this opportunity to introduce ourselves. Manhole Builders, Inc. is the product of four generations of hard work in the sewer contracting business, specializing in manhole installation. The three owners have a combined total of over 70 years in the business. Our success in the industry has now made it possible to expand into the manufacturing of the product we have been installing all these years. By cutting out the middle man, we will have more control over the service we can provide to our contractors,and product availability. Please see the accompanied brochure to get further insight into our company's history. The manufacturing of the precast manholes is a simple production process. It begins with the pouring of concrete each morning into metal manhole forms that have been wire reinforced. Mid-afternoon,when the concrete dries,the forms are removed and another set-of manholes are poured for the day, stripped the next morning, and the process continues. The finished precast is then removed by a loader from the outdoor production area and transferred to the storage area. A boom truck will load and deliver to our installation crew in the field once or twice a day. We have provided pictures of the type of truck and loader we will be using, as well as, the concrete mixer used in the production process. The admixtures we use in the concrete ensure the needed strength of the concrete,as well as the required drying and curing time. Osha specs are enclosed. None of the admixtures are considered to be hazardous materials according to the EPA. We would like to ensure you that we are working closely with all Water Quality Control and Air Quality Control boards in order to conform to required permitting processes and pollution prevention planning. Enclosed you will find our completed permit applications. We are receiving assistance from the Water Quality Control Board's representatives with our SWPPP program Our company is excited that we found property in the city of Grand Terrace, and we look forward to working successfully in your city for many years to come. Thank you for your time and attention on the review of our project plans. Sincerely, Stacy Ja eguy Project Coordinator Manhole Builders,Inc. (909) 997-0900 .(909) 467-2383 FAX Attachment K Contractors & Some of our Projects Developers IMF, 72W We are proud to say that we have enjoyed 0 California State Prison, Lancaster many loyal relationships with contractors 0 Ontario Mills Mall in our business, some that have spanned over 25years. Please take note of just a 0 Disneyland Improvements sample of our extensive resume of pipeline 0 LA County Fairground 5021 Stone Avenue contractors and developers. Improvements Riverside, CA 92509 0 Long Beach Town Center Phone (951) 681-0601 Babco Construction 0 Ontario Airport Fax (951) 681-0608 • S.J. Burkhardt, Inc. • Frito Lay, Ontario CJW General Contracting Stanley F. Yelich, Inc. • KB Homes i i CK Lewis Development �.J RM Centex Homes K. Hovnanian 'A Van Daele Development Lennar Homes Tilden Coil Constructors • Fullmer Construction *Manhole Builders services all water License No. 831892 • Olti-nans Construction Company districts in the Southern California area.* �►� Partial List of Services Office Management' Provided - We would like to take this opportunity to Our office management is headed by Mark inthe scheduling department, and Cathy in the introduce ourselves. Manhole Builders,Inc., previously known as PMI, has Standard Sewer Manholes estimating and accounting department. rightfully earned the reputation for being S-36 Type Manholes They are ready to fill your needs in a professional and efficient manner. We take dependable and for furnishing superior � pride in being able to accommodate your,workmanship. This is no doubt due to the Metering Manholes work schedule, and in keeping our prices fact that we take good old fashioned pride - very competitive. in the quality of our work, which has Safety Manholes ensured us with a repeat customer base, 0 PVC Manhole Lining founded primarily on referrals. We have enjoyed a smooth running business with • Drop Manholes Our Precast Supplier safety as a number one priority. - • Monitoring Manholes We install Southwest Concrete Siphon Manholes tS`;-''nj�'► Products, known for their quality � and service; a leading manu- facturer since 1966. We are proud of the family tradition we've continued to this day. The President of •t:"' our company is Eddie Jaureguy, a third ? generation manhole builder. His father, ' , '�� .•a`" .. ��" `"" ''� �ww` p Ed recently retired with over 45 ears °� "F �',it;i'3:,3 +:�`�':�.,+•`�'• :� �� ,+9': �• 4::�:•.. Y Fryff^��", 7Z'y,.•;a:,.. experience ,� ' ta.y F'S^ Y`. l t 1�F,•.4•TT+„ , � _ in constructs g , exP n manholes, ,a;, •.�.;.;,.:�i'' ��4; .; F' <•�. �, � ��.. • "s'• ' F�"`:'tea�`` '��=,"'� �;�t�,k•yip ,' ,�,;�z :'>�• spanning back brick 1 P to the days of �a :�.,1 +L..'�, � ,w •,:,;': ;; g Y ..k,},'' �•U��y,y�y'v%r:r�v .�., d i,;.,, ".. �%i:�4 r4" building. 's broth a �,. �?:',. y}.r.: manhole ding. ,�:;y .;. :_ ;: Eddie brother ,=�� Mark Hundl ;;;;;.. .1 .� �„� , . � �=�;•,>.1' ey is Vice-President, s,• ,'";.:; � • en} and is x;,r�� °1:. , ..< •,;;��, ��a , ha ppy to have his son Greg, a fourth r �..' manhole builder, generation working for us � '�:•�'��+�f�^w�r� ,,S .., # ' �'� :• _ out n field. i the Cathy Jaureguy has been ,�u - •`s'�'�;'•��z��s?, �/ < y �=�= , ' � with our family business since the of V !�;-1 1 I f•��.: beginning our PMI days and is our Secretary / CFO. All three -�ee owners.enjoy a of over 70 year Flume for metering manhole combined total g :,:,:'s ,,�;.,,�C.A::y'�'•. e>r».�r+�!,�.,,,.•. manhole business. s in the y� s� �: (1'J'a1r15'� +I CIF Ig", 11 ti,{y�% .I` « �:"�Nl q�'t,•' �I )I N`+'i rt}r��>a�•,j :EIr6: lt,,t'. 4[ �'.e, •1 � +,h1e I 90'; "a•r„jr;;•�..S4 t�'y;rrn��Y�l} 1t`•��:!(li•. 9'� 14�,,�I++ � �f��,1t,,�M1lrlrfalni 0!tt ?�}1J'JI( rMS'!rA}3�r•,�, '�,q.7nry� a Ilrth r ( �aJ ,•t�Id R��'� �if/l 1r+411 I ! `j i ilFx1 I <r t, r t Q Lf r.^} h`;.•l;r 1 y ){5 5 Y ,d t r 1 1 r p 1 1 �+(' A 1 7t y ♦ kl` '<iRtlrirf rt�(•II'fill>,}I<; ( 41 I � ,I 'f �.�,1 .r rr S i pl 4 J'.! J q/ r ( ,l II i If i�p. �4 1 ,,! r!f J�{ �i�t I+*(rl ,SJ1 hf 111 ti Lei P L i Pe/df0'1�41�•�r��aF�Gt I S t1 I r f� �.. 1511r(iF i`�•7�"'Jo i I�'k tt''`� �h'�•a!"itt14 IV �tRL twry � t ! r �y�i(. ,a r S! apt S'YtitriwSi'74df'r• "T 'r ti*f111r T 1 r+'ti'IStI{'a ``}� 1 �!t1'. rr1'd !r• u/<J r b�•1t ( Yt I� n /a��• TI h I Iw t y<A+ + ! 4 '�'`"�1 t 4 1 ,414 ,(1fr+JaF''f r-'!; r, .�-.}mil'• �� ' _r' (s!Q7 •( .'t•. +� l,.t t,,//l�.rrtir t'Y!1Mti ''• .' .rU.�. !•'.J"::.'• •h1�',t.. J .),1, T A t,t r'•(,111�7'fy't' � Iw.�•'t, '! y'+ .. •t�.• Po•�( .y� 7.1 •�tl tt r't=IEfi i✓MryJ �7,.�"'t� aw+,. "r'' ,. �, 'lt;� . � i��f; � t�•11 d lii�l�t 5'# ) t+•,h w t'--�w}-:r;S;"^t.e:.,,�. - h .. s�t Q ck'�n�"•��' srn'lr ,,•e:".•;".•. ...*•._• !1 'k r�,5 �/. .�11�}+.+lA��i1`S�f�ii��}II{1f�•1'jF�li��App rtl�jl�fR' :.I��I.h('i xi'f H.t.•s�t .,• 'U+ /4i1'`t •,f' 'j. y' i„1.17yy''1'�I;W�;t`.lt.({~t .'T'1,� t.•1'!y 47t'-wi t f t r 4 }%:.f°�'..,�..•,�. ,yl,��;, •;�'I,',1¢rall,:�l;''1•r...f•;.•ire;i�;k;�.,t.�'t ::.•ryt ara.;f..p, .. •.j`•:. t, L�i¢?r//(('�Ir,jv:��p�,yt4;�ll-?Sy:ac;Sit:Y):,:6,t1" 4r; •�".mrCl,^„•"•'(• nti:J�k•'iry*.,.�. ''t"i;' :��.. ly rV '#'`J`r t 7 It tb' 1. t' " ]?'J 'rk A 7 7 l t t t t .}?•'�'.. •t:, ;. I �y dn��DA", IP Ri �vitt{l� /r'!f, uIFF qr+ 4h'Y r�,1`(� � ,. 6 tl I tt ! •r. 7r +till h�n(IJtf9�'�i IY11✓*(�315 �� li arll t t�j l 7 �1�R fhVflfl ",yj' (4iji(r,�{71 '.""`rl J!1�!ri".`��Ir' fit✓I� )( rrl5> >t 'rrt fni'� 7� 5 : .M1 t %�-1'tl ltf,liJ Ilftf.J�lyi Attu t o 11 ( P(I,. •} 'tl'+>I't'S Ih! >�. t4 r31 �'b> I^} �F� ,t t s.+ lalh• !r I,h'111� S�rJ'1 T..sti a .,-S. tJAA"rl im7° + yr ea s rt � 4'`F IN9,*•ANf, Gty `A.1 ',. r • ,"�r I ",SAG'; „� f�'"7°f t,�.��,�� AS`fira nffrr^fIl l+t•jtit S7` lnla r r�'�•111r;r 1�7�`t'��'lit !rY�'rl'��:!�� .t� •' �"�?`.42.!n+ *�4 ' ,k"I Sam pnr ;'��}tY,(�{� ��r.�%t�' .r�.,. Il,1yy��'}7 1J rFt�1nt;J 1 `r :.ir t• �h. .> ! 1 I ?A� r A, r�'�i ••' -t � 1 JI r ,� rt = `t r:'r ,�f r•!� P k 1. `I I ty/t"1 #..., ,r t r 'S t 9' � J�'if�tt�h. -ny 't� .>< r + r r 7 r Yi'ir pp r I i,(mil[I✓�' R � t IYM1f I I t t V�l(/ 4 5 �Iti l y, a IIR,Irrl�l: f t �1 I Ir l ar 9 r yn° r 7 S d t{ r f,� }t) s r l i Gf( F }t 14n lik�r/tft lw ,{ t F (n Ltt+�J,J+'.. .�t� Jn 1 V .� i 117P�„},•9 t.1n4 F(r- � �! y l( p u'(i yN�.l17!A qG�w,t n r4}o(1 J, F�lliq{�ltll��,jA�iyr�U� �I(1 la,��1,7/t-gFly c iat F�1"tr '�t•t. , t �f(!I>; 1 v { n fi r r `1 '!rl'47j1Irl r�a^i}alt>,Srlr4�hv�i 18pfM71+1v�;�ln?, �•.'Pr''tT f( t !71 ,< )i'+1'4C 1 l f + .. ! I ti I I��t At A +1�� 7 in.J.��i 1 r gtrd �rtl •4'�II ICI �(7t 1�n'r vl�,1 It Jtt(il#11%��A AjIf11�U�fi•Mt`llh ft t''li1•I I'+�FIVIV�41f h.YS'if`IAi��I trr'tt t�l{1 (}�llity T`I. I�AIY ar I�` k�,' �ktp ��;; II `- a+}' ,•,tiS�al�:519�n(tlllJl(1p11�;�'ilA4<ri.i5l,l1rj1 r�tlf 1��'�,.�ulSiln>(ILI�+ISIiItS�t1 1n.�1�177>"'ll��'��r1it ��4� r... ,..JI'-! _ •1 _i;`t. .r'.�.1tA�.lh,� .+n I.SI yy,A7��irrelA!I.,fp!'II}Il�ill�.�'`, I�.vtirs��• r 3 ;i 1JJaCi i�`',J�t r',;.• .�o°. - 't !f':,-`.. , ::l�`N fi[i'l�j-s'iIi•4 A;�.'a�:itii:-^rV• .l s_ - -air�S". - :•ir%,�,�.F;'-i ;t. '>r >'I"j�Ya':- ��'2:t;.':,?ii.i.,•.. .. ,`'{:rti'� i.i�.j��;;;^},.1 jF�� •4�y.�4r�,r�,�sJ��fg:}�r�}.:��i`'1s;•;t'2):i.y� _ :,>" :?,' �Vi._`E :',�.. r:c..�. Y 4,;1 a;iy7.��,?i.rY. _..`�rli t"" 'G- �lt.,i ::t;e j:�:'• i:F' t;''e i.r'�;" k 'ti-y#!l+.{:+:; ,,.f� _ .+::Lfa• 1pt•rti;{.� 6 ?SsK+, �•,��"''1,' %"tom-x':"; :fps. _ ��L,' Ls?(•—ra.' �.a'•''Vt yp:,.i Wit.,:�• i•i�'.Y,Y �l.;l M1 ., E•. .�*J �, i ,y{�z:¶„"{w 4�io7 si+i+:.<.4`',F,`,:.a„ {+,.'•,i' •�e':t�: _ � _' .. . �s� �d '+7! F,i.+!s'ii' _ '- �t_1rt,.i� ,`,!i •y:.�r',,:.: � „ _ I. `=,f,�,u{;3:5'••:' ;:i;FJ_ � .. r f! •7-�-,. yip fry �htf'4._. �....c'v: 7"i•.}Ry� dr.'.,. 45�re g,:{;�,�,`h,a��i�,fyy� i .i'' �Yss'i�"• -• A.fx,ti t;h`k,' �'.F,,.�;e'- .. 1, PRECAST STORAGE AREA i o 13111 i2i;I 9�sqqKoR 27 C;- i vj NAZI:- t ! Ml ,,q 5�r ifaC , ......................... ;R gg� eX 'YZ 0- 4-m-- ... ....... OICIA -g- :-e-- -g-9QlP all Tt 'a-u U-Us b f l®r�da := :nc DIMENSIONS: Description Model-2000 Batch-Mixer Mode1-;2000-'Batch-Mixer & Silo Model-2000 E Overall Length 24'-0" w/Auger 52'-0'! w/Auger Width 91-411 81-411 8'-6" Diamet, Height 101-811 101-811 / 101-101, 22'-0" SL7'Up Area/Square Foot 200/SF 433/SF 1001SF* LM ixer w/round Silo - 500SF) �0 -AMP CAPACITIES: PRODUCTION: AggTegate Bins - 343 cubic feet Production Rate - 20 - 24 cubic yards per hour of 5.5 Bag Mix Batcher Cement Bin - 57 cubic feet Nis= ST�A�N DARD EQUIPMENT: 13 cu. Yd. Aggregate Bins Product Counter 12 ft. Dual Action Mixing AL Elect1ri C' Auger Winch 220 V 3 ph Electric Drive Motors Aux. Admix Power Outlets Con of Panel w/Main Disconnect Pressure Regulated Water System Cement Level Sight Windo Skid ounted for Portability OPTIONS: 2emLt Hopper Level Indicator 180' Auger Swivel Liquid Admix System Ask Us! .A. We have the knowledge, experience, & equi ipmei J that will answer all of your mixing needs. ............ he Del otto-2003 .Silo Batch-Mixer Bucket all are designe to keep pace with your growing business... a.are continually seeking to improve all Del Zotto Products.-Toward that end we reserve the'right to change prices and specifications without notic -000-2003 Del Zotto Products will litigate all participants in infringements on Patents,Patents Pending, Copyrights, and Proprietary Information. P R O D U C T N F O R M A T. 1 O N VA@ AD R U u--"-vst 500 a ' ® High Range Water-Reducing Admixture ASTM C 494, Type F ADVA ADVA® Cast 500 is a high range water-reducing admixture specifically formulated for precast �•;..,... .t�-.. .. PP w viscosity applications. It is a to cosity �: '��¢�'" -"_- -`: �':� �'•-` .'��,4_•.".,-�-. li uid which is readY o use t •as ., 9 , .� - X i ed. ADVA Cast 50 :#t" t received. 0 is � .�y� �.•.� :_ '',. �','�. •,ors.:::.: _ • ,.,-, °s cared under closet 411 manufactured y •:4•- ` t ��: -M- � �.�_ ;;ilk'..:..:,:;; .:yY',-.' •,;: .Via;�_ controlled conditions to provide ?: `y, s , uniform,predictable P Performance .�.,. �• �,; M-11-117 and is formulated to comply with specifications for Chemical e „ Admixtures for Concrete A , �. '''' Designation ' ' i � �:• a : `�a� <q. :j; :� `.i,:;.'' C 494 as a Type F admixture.ADVA Cast 500 contains no intentionally y added nr;1 calcium-chloride.Supplied as an amber colored liquid one liter weighs approximately 1.05 k (one gallon weighs approximately 8.71bs). ADVA Cast 500 is specifically • ADVA Cast 500 concrete formulated to enhance the set surface finishes with reduced ADVA Cast 500 high range water time and early strength bug holing. reducer(Superplasticizer)produces development of'concrete. • ADVA Cast 500 concrete, even concrete with extremely workable at high slump, exhibits no characteristics referred to as high significant segregation in slump, flowing concrete. It also ADVA Cast 500 can be used to comparison to concrete allows concrete to be produced reduce energy requirements of without a superplasticizer at with very low water/cement ratios external heat for accelerated the same slump. for high strength. curing. • ADVA Cast 500 is highly ADVA Cast 500 is ideal for ADVA Cast 500 concrete efficient,producing a high slump applications where it is desired to produced with Type I cement concrete at a low dosage rate. keep the water/cement ratio to a may be substituted for concrete ADVA Cast 500 is added to minimum and still achieve the produced with Type III cement concrete mix water for rapid degree of workability necessary to to achieve early release batching. provide easy placement and strengths. adequate consolidation. Attachment K Construction Products i P R O D U C T N F O R M A T 1 O N a Daravair 1000 Air-Entraining Admixture ASTM C 260, AASHTO M 154 Daravair® 1000 is a liquid air-entraining admixture that • provides freeze-thaw resistance yield control, and finishability gKIT performance across the full range ti' of concrete mix designs. Daravair •� .,ss,, ' 1000 is a clean, light-orangep.. product designed to generates; specification-quality air systems. Based on a high-grade saponified ''` rosin formulation, Daravair 1000 ' is chemically similar to vinsol- based products, but with increased purity and supply ,r- , • � - dependability. Daravair 1000 air-entraining admixture may be used wherever the purposeful entrainment of air is required by concrete specifica- • High Cement Factor the ooncrete. This can permit a tions. Formulated to perform • Fly Ash and Sta across the entire spectrum of g reduction in mixing water with no Superplasticizers loss of slump. Placeability is production mixes,Daravair 1000 o Manufactured Sands improved. Bleeding, plastic generates quality,freeze-thaw shrinkage and segregation are i resistant air systems in concrete minimized. conditions that include the Air is incorporated into the con- e following: crete by the mechanics of mixing Through the purposeful entrain- ] • Low Slump and stabilized into millions of dis- meat of air, Daravair 1000 • Paving crete semi-microscopic bubbles in markedly increases the durability • Central Mix the presence of a specifically of concrete to severe exposures O Extruded Slip Form designed air-entraining admixture Particularly to freezing and thaw- 41 uch as Daravair 1000. These air mg• It has also demonstrated a Mixes Containing Hot Water s and Accelerators bubbles act much like flexible ball remarkable ability to impart resis- ® Precast bearings increasing the mobility, tance to the action of frost and or plasticity and workability of deicing salts as well as sulfate, sea and alkaline waters. GRAa Construction Products P R O D U C T N F O R M A T 1 O N Po I U---a rSet Non-Corrosive, Non-Chloride Set Accelerating Admixture ASTM C 494, Type C PolarSet°is a non-corrosive, non- chloride admixture for concrete. It accelerates cement hydration resulting in shortened setting . times and increased early com- pressive strengths. ..•zts;- --: s' t,N• ;:";,:'• ';;:7• a:c:i„y �: _- y �RIMM< - '�}'`� �=' iv'�.�•'�r��+. „ ... .�.=• _ �'fi� 'r. as °r �`�;, ti:c �•x - � .;�y? .;'ixf,•_ F� r' _ �.�,__<. '.Rw.. f: .?�Iri' ..�"•� lam,. its q �-=�' � stF y / :.;y.7•.,i' �3:}�r_'ln`,. •� - .tee. ' �,��s",N".i3=j ��h�'+`. r ;y.�{'r t _ .�t. r.r•" ky�iy`: . .. ..tr�!'�`'�k�ia_:' 0 �nu•SZ:ji. f'.T' y •' S •.�iYt� ,•�:%�ti '�"!:"`•::�:�y�r�, I7i..A 1t SZE YJCL Y � .�i. .w• • - ,st!}r '`.T":, {,"i,'SN PolarSet does not contain calcium :�'p chloride and is completely non- corrosive to reinforcing steel, metal decks, and to all metal com- ponents of your admixture stor- age and dispensing system. It is formulated to comply with ASTM C 494 Type C and can be used at any dosage to comply with ACI For conditions not subject to be avoided. It can also be used in 318 guidelines for chloride con- freezing, PolarSet may be used to concrete that is to be placed on tent of concrete. One Liter of speed finishing operations and/or steel clad or zinc coated steel PolarSet weighs approximately form removal, leading to savings , decks.where corrosion must be 1.3S kg (11.25 lbs/gal). in concrete construction costs. similarly avoided. -PolarSet is specially formulated to PolarSet provides set time acceler- In concrete mixes, PolarSet accel- reduce concrete setting times and ation and early strength develop- erates the chemical reaction increase early strengths for con- ment similar to that provided by between pordand cement and crete in very cold conditions, and calcium chloride, but without the water.It speeds up the formation may be used to reduce the time potential corrosive effects. of gel—the binder that bonds that concrete must be protected PolarSet can, therefore, be used concrete aggregates together. against freezing in ambient tem- where potential corrosion of Accelerated gel formation in turn peratures as low as -TC (20T). embedded or stressed steel must shortens the setting time of'con- GRACE Construction Products State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality `. Terry Tatnminen 1001 I Street•Sacramento,California 95814•(916)341-5536 Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Mailing Address: P.O.Box 1977•Sacramento,California•95812-1977 Governor Environmental FAX(916)341-5543•Internet Address: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov Protection Email Address:stormwater@waterboards.ca.gov April 07, 2005 Stacy Jaure"y Manhole Builders Inc r 5021 Stone Ave Riverside, CA 92509-4003 RECEIPT OF YOUR NOTICE OF INTENT The State Water Resources Control Board(State Water Board)has received and processed your NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. Accordingly, you are required to comply with the permit requirements. The WDID identification number 8 36C333457. Please use this number in any future communications regarding this permit. SITE DESCRIPTION i OWNER:Manhole Builders Inc DEVELOPER:Manhole Builders Inc COUNTY:San Bernardino SITE ADDRESS:21712 Vivienda Ave Grand Terrace,CA 92313- COMMENCEMENT DATE:4/25/05 EST.COMPLETION DATE:06/15/05 When construction is complete or ownership has been transferred, dischargers are required to notify the Regional Water Board by submitting a Notice of Termination(NOT). All State and local requirements must be met in accordance with Special Provision No. 7 of the General Permit. If you do not notify the State Water Board that construction activity has been completed you will continue to be invoiced for the annual fee each April. Please visit the storm water web page at www.waterboards.ca.gov/stormwtr/index.html to obtain an NOT and other storm water related information and forms. � If u yo have any questions Ions regarding permit requirements,please contact your Regional Water Board at (951) 782-4130. wI i,flk I Sincerely, i Storm Water Section Division of Water Quality California Environmental Protection Aaencv ea Recycled Paper 5UU I H UUA51 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Pan 1 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Permit No. F75079 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE A/N 442181 This initial permit must be renewed ANNUALLY unless the equipment is moved,or changes ownership. If the billing for the annual renewal fee(Rule 301 J)is not received-by the expiration date, contact the District. Legal Owner ID 144061 or Operator: MANHOLE BUILDERS,INC. 5021 STONE AVE RIVERSIDE,CA 92509 Equipment Location: 21712 VIVIENDA AVE, GRAND TERRACE,CA 92313-4426 Equipment Description CONCRETE BATCH MIXER,DEL ZOTTO 2000,WITH A ROCK AND SAND BIN, 13 CU.FT.EACH,A 10 H.P. CHAIN CONVEYOR,AND A 10 H.P.DISCHARGE AUGER, P-10"DIA.X 12'-0"L. Conditions 1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW. 2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. 3. TOTAL MATERIAL PROCESSED THROUGH THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 240 CUBIC YARDS IN ANY ONE DAY. 4. A DAILY OPERATIONAL LOG OF MATERIAL PROCESSED SHALL BE MAINTAINED.ALL RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A PERIOD OF THE LAST TWO YEARS AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST. ORIGINAL 1 ' SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Paae2 y -+-? 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Permit No. F75079 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE A/N 442181 CONTINUATION OF PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE i NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206,THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE ALLOWED BY DMSION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR STATUES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. EXECUTIVE OFFICER By Dorris M.Bailey/SL02 4/27/2005 i i I i I ORIGINAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Page l 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Permit No. "';`✓"I r75081 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE 442183 This initial permit must be renewed ANNUALLY unless the equipment is moved,or changes ownership. If the billing for the annual renewal fee(Rule 301 J)is not received by the expiration date, contact the District. Legal Owner ID 144061 or Operator: MANHOLE BUILDERS,INC. 5021 STONE AVE RIVERSIDE,CA 92509 Equipment Location: 21712 VIVIENDA AVE,GRAND TERRACE,CA 92313-4426 Equipment Description : CEMENT SILO, 8'-6"DIA.X 22'-0"H.,75,200 POUND CAPACITY,WITH A 4" FILL PIPE,FILTER VENT WITH 12 FILTERS,A 2 H.P.SHAKER,AND A 7 'Y H.P.DISCHARGE SCREW CONVEYR, 0'-7"DIA.X 20'-0"L. Conditions 1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW. 2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. 3. TOTAL MATERIAL PROCESSED THROUGH THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 360 TONS IN ANY ONE DAY. 4. A DAILY OPERATIONAL LOG OF MATERIAL RECEIVED AND STORED SHALL BE MAINTAINED. ALL RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST. ORIGINAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Paget Y' 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Permit No. F75081 .�✓N aa21s3 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE CONTINUATION OF PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206,THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR WITHIN S ` METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR STATUES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. EXECUTIVE OFFICER 4 /&AY By Dorris M.Bailey/SL02 4/27/2005 i I i I I i ORIGINAL \�J l ; 1450 F.Washington St. • Colton, CA 92324-4696 ® (909)825 24128 FAX(909)825-1715 ` 'e nc a {��J```��✓ �NSEH e V F<� June 7, 2005 Manhole Builders Attn: Stacey - 5021 Stone Avenue Riverside, CA 92509 Dear Stacey; I am enclosing a small map showing the distance to your site from the existing water main. The Fire Marshall wants the fire hydrant to be one-hundred fifty feet from any portion of a structure. This may require that the fire hydrant be on-site with a detector check valve at the property line. I will need to meet with your engineer to work out the details. If an on-site fire hydrant is needed, .there are also fees for on-site fire suppression facilities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 825-4128. Thank you. Sincerely, Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RNH/ss Encl. J ,� ?'l`,l ��./+ram,.• � i } f 19 O >4J i ! ............... ............... �. _ 1 ._ _. ..............._._.._......_. ..._._.._.... 0 c tA 55, MCI" ?, 1', qq "Ile �gg i1i"".kt! 'CA f- 1-*'47 t�-Z, Yji IV 1� V I tlk n ak" i. ono Uf llJTA ,�,wwg� AV "Res. 1'(1 Nam-, - TT Ali ov"","W', ,02 •RN f R',TIP Z 4M. A) V, A AM"Mat, Wetyl .0,01 41. J. �WR• ,v r Y 1A!.qF. n� MM ff" "! , ` � ..N�^�,*,'�vy ,. I •I Q��,�_ 59:� v'i Lu, ip, t'l UA "NUN All 14 �u VM n ,ov- z�p7 AA, Por. Rancho Son Bernordino, M.B. 7/2 275_ Por. Jurupo Roncho,M.B. 1/47 Grand Terrace City Colton -City Colton -Jt. U:hffie.d Tax Rate 2008,2009,64,050, .16001 , 2660,20417.16001 - (�653,11 P 41 P �0• � •• l A��5gG F I N I� u �v> 2 AP S.B.C.F.C.D. { �63 Por_ Lot 3 Ica QpB K. IESSEA j'ON 163- 6C-13 ti 6:25AC MIL OR.MAP 604-36693F,PAR.NO.13 2 4 AP 872-36-22 2 , ASSESSED ON PAGE 22 CITY• PAR.NO. 15 p8 35 AC ,�ss•�' 53 ZO. TCA S 2.96 A.C. ROA � PAR. .zi - 7 TCA 16001 ' „R 39 MIL O f 3 ? h a23•7i a 0 . , 15.64.AC.MIL 34 O 4 a (V POr. Lot 39 13.5 AC. MIL Por. Lot 4 30 -A48 P872-36-22C Q MAP 408-36-33 4 y PAR.NO..12 PAR. 1 35 �P 12 AC'M/L 6osz r. � %�MAP 148-36-25,PAR.NO.4 co pco ,O4 O Q N.N g V Q a 4.6AC U 1.43A C 43 31 ZOAI 4.6 AG 5.1 AC N 44 SOP O� 2.02 AC. 57 �� MA .7 ® MAP 408-36-3s PAR 2 P v I R.S,B '2 O 55 1 AC. .4, 55 MAP 872=36-22F:' AR. 19 j IV A 49 A i 2AC b 'Q REVISED MAP 872-36-22F PAR.NO.18 6/27/77 LJ' r� F 7/17/78 Assessor's Map 2/27/79 B C Note-Assessor's.elk.S Lot 2Gr Book 275, Page 19 6-14-83 E Numbers Shown in Circles 23 San-Bernardino Count ��04 R, • I Exhibit 6 General Plan ZoningMap p General Plan Designation: Zoning Plan Land Use: 0 Industrial and Flood Plain M2- Industrial and Flood Plain Industrial ® M2- Industrial 0 Low Density Residential R1-7.2 with Ag-Overly Medium Density Residential "'``""'" '`=fi'�1c��:` R2 with Ag-Overly 1 �a`��1�,°'„_��'�t,�'�""•r+�ll�'3„%�'F'P"'a,M��,:( yl'`��'��y'i' a�ywr,Y��.�,;�? ,'�cS � �. • ".•,£'•.z-`��'gv� z"..:'N'u'�r.��'.z�'y-�'.��>;�°M'+��:a:5'fs ','�',�<r"�'i�`�rV ••'�af,�'+y��Y2ar"��t� P�S�� `M�'�,b•'"k:; ''�bS{d;,a�,'7'PyWi.d`:,'V+ f�r�Y ..i:��:",i tY "`�'�"'��1':.e3��`y;�S�r'7,=';Y:t;�;"��`i.'� ri+�r�,d, '�..•y��i ,:";� Y V$.? i P 1�•�Y1 i�'dl T'�jl:h)., Y+, Y ,FBA � ;��,,. l y�r� it•�. .; �^�k :::ti.'•"� �3yktV,,�:i,�$.�,tiAyt!,��ip�}s Id:,y„ir, t N ��L f'��,' c 4�'Vk• d,:.rr. ,ni. .Y,, yV+Y�1f"✓`,n�,�c( Y'CV��'7ti'±,1,�"�•y ,y, };Q^'ti,��;d�F��+� .,r;.:',rS"F,r 1v� �k�klcj�1�la•,+c,�,',+,r+ri��` 1+' �: „W,, '';7i't,�� °• .i"' � .H 3'?, _ '�" '1;1Y�.„ P1. ��i'?�,Yia yji- .L ,Nl' ''n•n{�Y bt 15.Y:,1 ..4 L.w`;l'if `L y��l d��Y F^dl)�+y yatl{.:.V��,ti �` .YfY15?��f::t,rryL, H�'`y(n�t� 15•. r .ad,".M1�.��N� Y,i ^'�' ��.�i3r:��SF'�;.�t�: gib;n.. ,„s•, r�' •.� ( +:�.�r,a,�^;:� MW� Y.r• y��'k.��Ynkr .�vr�' ,vt,,,�;•A f: rt3;±�,fri'°li�''E'1:� i:1,, I! 4 9f :Ra�;.'�yc, re (�} 'a,r;:. ''Y,, :, 4s,c•.' '`' ^�r��;ti'�'.3t4r3kcL?rr��t RFIMD TER C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: August 25,2005 SUBJECT: AWARD OF THE 2005-06 STREET STRIPING CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST BIDDER DETERMINED BY STAFF FROM THE AUGUST 22,2005 BID OPENING FUNDING AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: In the 2005-06 Measure I Plan,the city council voted to appropriate up to$80,000 for city-wide street striping,stop bars,and crosswalks. It is estimated that the city will receive a total of around$188,000 in Measure I Funds in the 2005-06 fiscal year for road improvements. Staff released to the public GTB Bid No. 05-02 for city-wide street striping services on July 22,2005 with a bid opening on August 22,2005. Staff will determine the lowest bidder from the respondents and provide a brief spreadsheet to council at the August 25,2005 council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that council approve the selected low bidder as recommended by staff for GTB Bid No. 05-02. Staff is requesting council to approve the street striping contract,Exhibit"A",with the recommended contractor's name as a party in the contract. �O'U UL AGENDA ITEM NOS uoP i EXHIBIT "A" AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND (CONTRACTOR) FOR THE PROVISION OF THE 2005-06 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO THIS DAY OF 2005, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ("CITY") AND ("CONTRACTOR")FOR STREET STRIPING SERVICES. I RECITALS WHEREAS, (CONTRACTOR) is a licensed contractor who is qualified to provide the services required of the 2005-06 Street Striping for the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to utilize the services of CONTRACTOR to perform street-striping services for the 2005-06 Street Striping program as attached herein. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. SERVICES OR SCOPE OF WORK CONTRACTOR shall perform all the services as described as follows: A. For and in consideration of the payments and Agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by said CITY, said CONTRACTOR agrees with said CITY to perform and complete in a workmanlike manner all work required under the Bidding Schedule of the CITY's Specifications, in accordance with the Specifications and Drawings therefor, to furnish at his own expense all labor, materials, equipment, tools, and services necessary therefor, except those materials, equipment, tools, and services as may be stipulated in said Specifications to be furnished by said CITY and to do everything required by this Agreement and the said Specifications and I Drawings. B. The Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Information required of Bidder, Specification, Drawings, and all addenda issued by the CITY with respect to the foregoing prior to the opening of bids, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement. j C. In entering into a Public Works Contract for a subcontract to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to a Public Works Contract, the CONTRACTOR or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the CITY all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Section 16700) of ! Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Public Works Contract or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the CITY tenders final payment to the CONTRACTOR without further acknowledgment by the parties. SECTION 2. SERVICES PROVIDED CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, supervision, and equipment required to perform said services. SECTION 3. COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR shall be paid pursuant to the Bid Schedule and Prices. SECTION 4. BUSINESS LICENSE CONTRACTOR shall, within five (5) days of executing this Contract, obtain a current City of Grand Terrace Business License, valid during the term of this Contract or any extension thereto. SECTION 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The parties agree that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor who is being paid to produce a result. CONTRACTOR is in no way an employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR controls the means of accomplishing the work. CONTRACTOR shall pay all Federal and State payroll taxes for employees of CONTRACTOR and said employees shall in no way be deemed or construed to be employees of CITY for any purposes. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE/TERM This Agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution of the Agreement by both parties. This Contract shall terminate on December 31, 2005 unless renewed. SECTION 7. TERMINATION CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at a date earlier than specified for default. Before CITY exercises said right, it shall give CONTRACTOR ten (10) days notice of the facts constituting the default and a chance to cure any deficiencies within that time. If those deficiencies have not been cured, CITY shall have the right to send CONTRACTOR notice that the Contract has been terminated for default pursuant to this paragraph by giving notice as provided herein. i SECTION 8. ASSIGNMENT i No assignment of this Contract may be made without the express written consent of CITY. SECTION 9. NOTICE The parties may give notice under this Contract by sending such notice certified mail addressed as follows: TO CITY: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 ATTN: City Representative's Name TO CONTRACTOR: (CONTRACTOR ADDRESS) I. Such notice shall be deemed received five (5) days after mailing, whether signed for or not. SECTION 10. GRATUITIES CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. SECTION 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any architect, engineer, or other preparer of the Plans and E Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY has detailed Conflict of Interest rules, agrees to abide by those rules, and agrees that any breach of those rules shall give CITY the right to rescind, cancel, or otherwise terminate this Agreement, at CITY's discretion. SECTION 12. INTEGRATION i This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties j hereto, and it shall not be considered modified, altered, changed, or amended in any respect unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. o SECTION 13. NO WAIVER The failure of the CITY at the time to require performance by the CONTRACTOR of any provisions hereof shall in no way affect the right of the CITY thereafter to enforce same. Nor shall waiver by the CITY of any breach of any provisions hereof be taken or held to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of such provision or as a waiver of any provision itself. SECTION 14. INSURANCE The CONTRACTOR shall supply insurance and licensing as follows: Commercial General Liability: Primary insurance shall be provided on IOSCGL form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. Total limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence for all coverage's and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) general aggregate. CITY and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 11 85 (in no event will CITY accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non- contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to CITY or any employee or agent of CITY. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Umbrella Liability Insurance (over primary) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a "drop down" provision providing primary coverage above a maximum twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates. Worker's Compensation: Shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the CITY, its employees, or agents. The CONTRACTOR shall also provide the CITY with a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance and completed Declaration Regarding Licenses Status form. CONTRACTORS must also have a valid City of Grand Terrace Business License. Auto Insurance• CONTRACTOR shall provide Auto Insurance as follows: Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If CONTRACTOR owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. SECTION 15 LEGAL ACTION Should the CITY bring any legal or equitable action for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its rights under this Agreement, the CITY shall recover, in addition to all other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to be fixed by the Court. SECTION 16 ATTORNEY'S FEES The parties agree that should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation of this contract, or regarding the performance or non-performance of this contract, that the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. SECTION 17 EXTRA WORK The CONTRACTOR hereby agrees that he will not proceed with any Extra Work unless he has been authorized in writing to do so by CITY. WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE By: City Clerk Mayor CONTRACTOR j Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: i By: City Attorney .CITY RONDTERR C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: August 25,2005 SUBJECT: AWARD OF THE STREET SLURRY CONTRACT TO AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH,INC.FOR THE 2005-06 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM FUNDING AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED: 'BACKGROUND: In the 2005-06 Measure I Plan,the city council voted to appropriate up to$58,074.92 for road slurry projects. It is estimated that the city will receive a total of around$188,000 in Measure I Funds in the 2005-06 fiscal year for road improvements. Staff has driven city with slurry sealing representatives reviewing road conditions. The goal was to identify roads that with the addition of Type II Road Slurry,will last 5-7 more years. Many roads throughout the city-have sustained too much wear and tear for the slurry to be effective and have been put on the list for reconstruction in the future. Several roads do fit the criteria for slurry seal and have been included in the 1 2005-06 Slurry Seal Program(see Exhibit"A"). The city was divided into four quadrants and slurry projects were selected in each quadrant. City staff is taking advantage of the recent bidding for slurry seal service in the City of Ontario. The City of Ontario went out to bid in June 2005 and awarded a large contract to American Asphalt South--the lowest bidder. American Asphalt South has agreed to charge Grand Terrace the same pricing schedule(Exhibit "13)as the city of Ontario. The city will notify all affected residents by mail of the pending street maintenance at least two weeks in advance. In addition,American Asphalt South will place bright colored door hangers 72 hours in advance of the work to ensure that residents do not drive on the slurry sealing before it is dry. Average drying time is about 4-6 hours. American Asphalt South has successfully completed work for the City in the past. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that council approve the contract(Exhibit"C")with American Asphalt South,Inc.for road slurry services in the City of Grand Terrace. r A t o t� il American Asphalt South, Inc. Date: JULY 27TH, 2005 To: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Address: 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313-5295 Attn: STEVE BERRY r` Phone: (909)430-2226 Fax: (909)783-7629 From: LYLE STONE Pages: 1 Subject: 2005 TYPE 11 RUBBERIzED SLURRY SEAL PROJECT i American Asphalt South, Inc.will provide all equipment, labor, material and itools to perform the following work on the,above referenced project. ITEM# DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UN�.) O�01, 1 VIVIENDA CT SY 1,334.00 $1.31 $1,747.64 2 CARHARTAVE SY, 3,091.00 $1,31 $4,049.21 3 HOLLY DRIVE SY. 4,598.00 $1.31 $5,023:38 4 ARLISS DR SY 13,010.00 $1.31 $17,0+43.10 5 MINONA DR SY 4,437.00 $1.31 $5,812,47 6 FINCH ST" SY 3,645.00 $1..31 $4,774.95 7 LARK•ST SY 3,253.00 $1.31 $4,261.43 8 FRANKLIN WAY SY 990.00 $1.31 $1,296,90 9 LADERA SY 2,805.00 $1.31 $3,674-55 10 RAVEN SY 2,182,00 $1.31 $2,858,42 11 TANAGER SY 2,182.00 $1.31 $2,858.42 12 FLAMINGO SY 2,805.00 $1.31 $3,674.56 TOTAL 44,332.00 TOTAL= $68,074,92 The following inclusions and exclusions apply. IN.CLUS.0-NS: 1'MOVE-IN' ADVANCE POSTING& NOTIFYING TRAFFIC CONTROL FOa SLURRY SEALING CLEANING OF AREAS PRIOR TO SLURRY SEALING i EXGL_USCQNS. PAVEMENT REPAIRS CRACK WEEDING, CLEANING &SEALING -" STRIPEIMARKER-REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, PROTECTION, OR REFERENCING TEMPORARY STRIPINGIMARKING CLEANING OR WEEDING OTHER THAN STATED ABOVE i - SUBMITTED BY: DATE: � � YLE STONE-SENIOR'ESTIMATOR i - , iACCEPTED BY: DATE: www.americanasphaltsouth.com Lic,#784969 1.4436 SANTA ANA AVE.•FONTANA,CA 92337•P.O.OOX 0610-FONTANA, CA 92334 •(800) 678-4007- (909)427-8276-FAX(909)427-8279 ke to Q- 03 PE AST :'T' STREET, CIVIC CENTER ONTARI ,I lfi� CALIFORNIA 91764-4196 (909) 39.5-�)nnn FAX (909) 395-2()70 ENGINEERING DEPARTKENT ALAN 0.WAPNER GREGORY C DEVEREAUX MAYOR PRO TEM CITY MANAGER GERALD A.DuBOIS May 16, 2005 MARY E.WIRTES, MMC PAULS. LEON CITY CLERK JASON ANDERSON C, !L.MEMBERS JAMES R.MILHISER TREASURER American Asphalt South,Inc. 14436 Santa Ana Ave. Fontana, CA 92337 )7 Attention: Mr. Lyle Stone SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD: CITY OF ONTARIO 2004/2005 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM-PHASE 11; CONTRACT NO. 0405-19 Dear Mr. Stone: Please consider this a notice of intent to award Contract No. 0405-19; City of Ontario 2004/2005 Slurry Seal Program - Phase 11,to American Asphalt South, Inc., by the Ontario City Council. Three sets of the Agreement, Faitliftil Perfori-nance Bond, and the Labor and Material Bond are enclosed for execution on behalf of your company. Also included are two copies of the Workmen's Compensation Insurance Certification. Two sets of a Certification of Insurance in the amounts with minimum acceptability stated in the Contract Specifications must be forwarded to the City with the agreement. Please execute and return the enclosed Contract Agreement by, Thursday, May 26, 2005, and the remaining documents to the City within 12 working days of mailing of this notice as per the Contract Specifications. Failure to execute the documents within the specified time may cause the Contractor to be considered non-responsive. Following execution on behalf of the City, one set of the agreement and bonds will be returned to you for your records. If you have any questions on this project, please contact Gary Harms (909) 3)95-2 130, of this office. Sincerely, I........... Gary Harms Associate Engineer Enclosures: Agreement(3) Faithful Performance Bond(3) Labor and Material Bond(3) workman's Compensation Insurance Certification(2) Printed on reevrip.d r)ar)pr. . r i BIDDER: "4"e ' BIDDING SCHEDULE CONTRACT NO. 0405-19 I UNIT OF EST. I �1NNIT �TEl NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION MEASUREI COST Trai is Control&Safety(Neighborhood i Slurry Locations) "Lump Sum L.S. I $ �'� L S Traffic Control & Safety (Collector/ IA arterial Locations Lum Sum S. �� Remove Raised Markers&Thermoplastic Markings/Striping (Neighborhood Slurry 2 Locations) Lump Sum L.S. $ ® �L.S. � AA Remove Raised Markers&Thermoplastic Markings/Striping (Collector/Arterial 2A Locations) Lump Sum L.S.' $ � �L S Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (Type II Slurry Aggregate) 210,000 (Neighborhood Slurry Locations) S.Y. S.Y. lS Y6/� ' Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (Type H Slurry Aggregate) 53,000 3A (Collector/Artenal Locations) S.Y. S Y S f`4 P /S Y ��&0 Traffic Striping, Ivlar_kings &, Markers 4 (Neighborhood Slurry Locations) Lump Lurnp Sum I L.S. S Y40ML S Traffic Striping, Markings & Markers 4A (Collector/Arterial Locations) Lum Sum L.S. S L,S �V, Construct Asphalt Concrete Skin Patch I 4,500 5 (Neighborhood Slurry Locations) S.Y. S.Y 4iFW/S.Y Me 400 Construct Asphalt Concrete Skm Patch 7,400 SA (Collector Arterial Locations S.Y. I S.Y. �� /S.Y ® Repair Potholes (Neighborhood Slurry 2,000 6 Locations ' S.F. I S.F. �� /S.F. Repair Potholes (Collector Arterial 2,000 / 6A Locations) S.F. S.F. S d. e9V /S.F. gee.40 7 Ear-Lhwork/Export/StormDebris Removal- 3,500 Ontario Mills Parkway C.Y. I C.Y. S gdx/C.Y. CIO I i i TO,TAL BID PRICE kSCHED JL,E BID R CE).$ (DOLL AR AMOUNT IN 1"d dTTEN F©RPn) Rk PUB/P,.CDi65364<: GB-STATE&LOCAL.(02/04) f EXHIBIT"C" AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE - AND AMERICAN ASPHALT (CONTRACTOR) FOR THE PROVISION OF ROAD SLURRY SERVICES. THIS AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO THIS _ DAY OF 2005 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ("CITY") AND CONTRACTOR FOR ROAD SLURRY SERVICES. RECITALS WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR is a licensed contractor who is qualified and a licensed street slurry maintenance contractor. WHEREAS, CITY desires to utilize the services of CONTRACTOR to implement the 2005- 06 Street Maintenance Slurry Program. NOW,THEREFORE,THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. SERVICES OR SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform a variety of services for the City-wide Street Maintenance Slurry Program as follows: A. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by said City, said Contractor agrees with said City to perform and complete in a workmanlike manner all work required under the City's Specification, in accordance with-the Specifications on Exhibit A, to furnish at his own expense all labor, materials, equipment, tools and services necessary therefor, except those materials, equipment, tools and services as may be stipulated in said specification to be furnished by said City,and to do everything_ required by this Agreement and the said Specifications. B. In entering into a Maintenance Contract for a subcontract to supply goods, services or materials pursuant to a Maintenance Contract, the Contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Maintenance Contract or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties. City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Slurry Services Agreement-Pg. 9 i I I ' SECTION 2. SERVICES PROVIDED CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, supervision and equipment required to perform said services. SECTION 3. COMPENSATION Contractor shall be paid pursuant to the Schedule and Prices submitted in Exhibit A. SECTION 4. BUSINESS LICENSE i CONTRACTOR shall, within five (5) days of executing this contract, obtain a current City of Grand Terrace business license, during the term of this contract or any extension thereto. SECTION 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The parties agree that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor who is being paid to produce a result. CONTRACTOR is in no way an employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR controls the means of accomplishing the work. CONTRACTOR shall pay all Federal and State payroll taxes for employees of CONTRACTOR and said employees shall in no way be deemed or construed to be employees of CITY for any purposes. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE/TERM This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution of the Agreement by both parries. i This contract shall terminate on October 1, 2005 unless renewed. SECTION 7. TERMINATION City shall have the right to terminate this agreement at a date earlier than specified for default. Before CITY exercises said right it shall give CONTRACTOR 10 days notice of the facts constituting the default and a chance to cure any deficiencies within that time. If those deficiencies have not been cured, CITY shall have the right to send CONTRACTOR notice that the contract has been terminated for default pursuant to this paragraph by giving notice as provided herein. SECTION 8. ASSIGNMENT No assignment of this contract may be made without the express written consent of CITY. i SECTION 9. NOTICE 1 The parties may give notice under this contract by sending such notice certified mail addressed as follows: TO CITY: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Slurry Services Agreement-Pg. 2 ATTN: STEVE BERRY TO CONTRACTOR: Such notice shall be deemed received five(5) days after mailing,whether signed for or not. SECTION 10. GRATUITIES CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents or representatives has offered or given any gratuities to CITY'S employees, agents or representatives with a view toward securing this contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. SECTION 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any architect, engineer or other preparer of the plans and specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY has detailed Conflict of Interest rules, agrees to abide by those rules, and agrees that any breach of those rules shall give CITY the right to,rescind, cancel or otherwise terminate this agreement, at CITY'S discretion. SECTION 12. INTEGRATION This agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and it shall not be considered modified, altered, changed, or amended in any respect unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. SECTION 13. NO WAIVER The failure of the CITY at the time to require performance by the CONTRACTOR of any provisions hereof shall in no way affect the right of the CITY thereafter to enforce same. Nor shall waiver by the CITY of any breach of any provisions hereof be taken or held to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of such provision or as a waiver of any provision itself. SECTION 14. INSURANCE The Contractor shall supply insurance and licensing as follows: Commercial General Liability: Primary insurance shall be provided on IOSCGL form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. Total limits shall be no less than 1 million dollars per occurrence for all coverage's and 2 million dollars general aggregate. City and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 11 85 (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Slurry Services Agreement-Pg. 3 i City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Umbrella Liability Insurance (over primary) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a"drop down"provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates. 1 Worker's Compensation: Shall be written on-a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the City, its employees or agents. The Contractor shall also provide the City with a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance and completed Declaration Regarding Licenses Status form. Contractors must also have a valid City of Grand Terrace Business License. Auto Insurance: CONTRACTOR shall provide Auto Insurance as follows: Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than (one) 1 million dollars per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Contractor owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. SECTION 15 LEGAL ACTION i Should the City bring any legal or equitable action for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its rights under this Agreement, the City shall recover, in addition to all other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to be fixed by the Court. SECTION 16 ATTORNEY'S FEES The parties agree that should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation of this contract, or regarding the performance or non-performance of this contract, that the prevailing party shall,be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. SECTION 17 EXTRA WORK The Contractor hereby agrees that he will not proceed with any Extra Work unless he has been authorized in writing to do so by CITY. r City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Slurry Services Agreement-Pg. 4 WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE By: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR By: City Attorney Title: City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Slurry Services Agreement-Pg. 5 0010127 r . RAND TER9090 NQ01, Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: August 25,2005 SUBJECT: AWARD OF THE ASPHALT CRACK SEALING CONTRACT TO ROADWORKS, INC. FUNDING AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: In the 2005-06 Measure I Plan,the city council voted to appropriate up to$20,000 for asphalt crack sealing. It is estimated that the city will receive a total of around$188,000 in Measure I Funds in the 2005-06 fiscal year for road improvements. Asphalt crack sealing is done on roads to seal %<to 1"cracks that occur in the streets. By sealing the cracks, water---which is a major cause of road deterioration--cannot penetrate.This maintenance extends the life of the road. Visually,crack sealing is not very appealing in residential neighborhoods. For this reason,staff will be coordinating the slurry sealing after the crack sealing has been done on the residential roads identified in the 2005-06 Slurry Sealing Program. City staff is taking advantage of the recent bidding for asphalt crack sealing in the City of San Diego. The City of San Diego went out to bid in January 2004(see Exhibit"A"). Under a 5-year contract,the city awarded Road Works,Inc.--the lowest bidder—the job. Road Works,Inc.has agreed to charge Grand Terrace the same pricing schedule(Exhibit`B)as the City of San Diego. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that council approve the contract(Exhibit"C")with Road Works,Inc.for asphalt crack sealing services in the City of Grand Terrace. CCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No i EG°'ST�a CITY OF SAN DIEGO Fyn+ PURCHASING DIVISION 1200 Third Avenue,Suite 200 San Diego,CA 92101-4195 i Bid No. 6559-04-W REQUEST FOR BID Bid Opening Date: January 22,2004 @ 2:30 p.m. jSubjecc Furnish the City of San Diego with ON-CALL ASPHALT CRACK SEALING,as may be required for a period of one(1) year from date of award,with options to renew for four(4)additional one(1)year periods, in accordance with the attached specifications. LICENSE REQUIRED: C-32 STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE. Company Road Works , Inc. Name Kelly J. Blocker R Yp Federal Tax 1.D.No. 9 5-41 9 8 2 8 2 ./ Street Address 303 Short St. Signature* City Pomona Title Vice Pre n State California Zip Code 9 17 68 Date_ January 20, 2004 Tel.No. (909) 469-5101 Fax No. (909) 469-5112 *Authorized Signature: The signer declares under penalty ofperjury that E-Mail sheltie is authorized to sign this document and bind the company or �iGQCKERta R�DWORKS Nt3' organization to the terms of this agreement. I i This cover page must be completed and submitted as part of your bid. If your firm is not located in California,are you authorized to collect California sales tax? ❑ YES ❑ NO i If YES,under what Permit# N/A i NOTE: The City of San Diego is subject to State Sales and Use Tax, but is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and will furnish exemption certificates upon request. Do not include Federal Excise or Sales Tax in your Bid. If you are a Vendor located in the City of San Diego,a I%sales tax refund to the City will be considered in evaluation of your bid. Cash discount terms % days. (Terms of less than 20 daps ivill be considered as Nct 30./or hid evaluation purpos•es.j I State delivery time required: N/A days after receipt of order. i The following addenda are acknowledged and incorporated in this submittal: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THIS BID WAYDE J. HELDIBRIDLE/b19, Procurement Specialist j Phone: (619) 236-6257 . Facsimile: (619) 236-5904 s � E-mail: WHeldibridle@sandiego.gov Bid No.6559-04-W I. PRICING PAGE Est. Dekt �_= ` UIM. U Extension 1,500,000 LIN FT Asphalt Crack Sealing $ 0 . 295 $ 4 4 2, 5 0 0 . 0 - - r Page 3 of 20 i I EXHIBIT "C" AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND ROAD WORKS, INC. (CONTRACTOR) FOR THE PROVISION OF ASPHALT CRACK SEALING SERVICES. i THIS AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO THIS _ DAY OF 2005 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ("CITY") AND CONTRACTOR FOR ASPHALT CRACK SEALING SERVICES. RECITALS WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR is a licensed contractor who is qualified and is a licensed asphalt crack sealing maintenance contractor. WHEREAS, CITY desires to utilize the services of CONTRACTOR to implement the 2005- 06 Street Maintenance Program. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. SERVICES OR SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform a variety of services for the 2005-06 City-wide Street Maintenance Program as follows: A. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by said City, said Contractor agrees with said City to perform and complete in a j workmanlike manner all work required under the City of San Diego Specifications, Exhibit D, to furnish at his own expense all labor, materials, equipment, tools and services necessary therefor, except those materials, equipment, tools and services as may be stipulated in said specification to be furnished by said City and to do everything required by this Agreement and the said Specifications. B. In entering into a Maintenance Contract for a subcontract to supply goods, services or materials pursuant to a Maintenance Contract, the Contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of j the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Maintenance Contract or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to ! the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties. I i City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Asphalt Crack Sealing Agreement-Pg. 1 SECTION 2. SERVICES PROVIDED CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, supervision and equipment required to perform said services. SECTION 3. COMPENSATION Contractor shall be paid pursuant to the Schedule and Prices submitted in Exhibit B. SECTION 4. BUSINESS LICENSE CONTRACTOR shall, within five (5) days of executing this contract, obtain a current City of Grand Terrace business license, during the term of this contract or any extension thereto. SECTION 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The parties agree that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor who is being paid to produce a result. CONTRACTOR is in no way an employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR controls the means of accomplishing the work. CONTRACTOR shall pay all Federal and State payroll taxes for employees of CONTRACTOR and said employees shall in no way be deemed or construed to be employees of CITY for any purposes. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE/TERM This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution of the Agreement by both parties. This contract shall terminate on October 1, 2005 unless renewed. SECTION 7. TERNIINATION City shall have the right to terminate this agreement at a date earlier than specified for default. Before CITY exercises said right it shall give CONTRACTOR 10 days notice of the facts constituting the default and a chance to cure any deficiencies within that time. If those deficiencies have not been cured, CITY shall have the right to send CONTRACTOR notice that the contract has been terminated for default pursuant to this paragraph by giving notice as provided herein. SECTION 8. ASSIGNMENT No assignment of this contract may be made without the express written consent of CITY. SECTION 9. NOTICE The parties may give notice under this contract by sending such notice certified mail addressed as follows: TO CITY: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Asphalt Crack Sealing Agreement-Pg. 2 ATTN: STEVE BERRY TO CONTRACTOR: i Such notice shall be deemed received five(5) days after mailing,whether signed for or not. SECTION 10. GRATUITIES CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents or representatives has offered or given any gratuities to CITY'S employees, agents or representatives with a view toward securing this contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. i SECTION 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any architect, engineer or other preparer of the plans and specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY has detailed Conflict of Interest rules, agrees to abide by those rules, and agrees that any breach of those rules shall give CITY the right to rescind, cancel or otherwise terminate this agreement, at CITY'S discretion. SECTION 12. INTEGRATION This agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and it shall not be considered modified, altered, changed, or amended in any respect unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. SECTION 13. NO WAIVER The failure of the CITY at the time to require performance by the CONTRACTOR of any provisions hereof shall in no way affect the right of the CITY thereafter to enforce same. Nor shall waiver by the CITY of any breach of any provisions hereof be taken or held to be a waiver of any succeeding breach i of such provision or as a waiver of any provision itself. I SECTION 14. INSURANCE The Contractor shall supply insurance and licensing as follows: i Commercial General Liability: Primary insurance shall be provided on IOSCGL form No. CG 00 01 1185 or 88. Total limits shall be no less than 1 million dollars per occurrence for all coverage's and 2 million dollars general aggregate. City and its'employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 11 85 (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Asphalt Crack Sealing Agreement-Pg. 3 City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Umbrella Liability Insurance (over primary) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a "drop down"provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates. Worker's Compensation: Shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed; this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the City, its employees or agents. The Contractor shall also provide the City with a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance and completed Declaration Regarding Licenses Status form. Contractors must also have a valid City of Grand Terrace Business License. Auto Insurance: I CONTRACTOR shall provide Auto Insurance as follows: T - Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 0106 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than (one) 1 million dollars per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Contractor owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. SECTION 15 LEGAL ACTION Should the City bring any legal or equitable action for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its rights under this Agreement, the City shall recover, in addition to all other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to be fixed by the Court. SECTION 16 ATTORNEY'S FEES I The parties agree that should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation of this contract, or regarding the performance or non-performance of this contract, that the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. i SECTION 17 EXTRA WORK The Contractor hereby agrees that he will not proceed with any Extra Work unless he has been authorized in writing to do so by CITY. i City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Asphalt Crack Sealing Agreement-Pg.4 I 1 I 1 I I I \ 1 WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE By: j City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR By: City Attorney i Title: i I I j - I , I f r i City of Grand Terrace-2005-06 Asphalt Crack Sealing Agreement-Pg.5 Bid No.6559-04-W IV. SPECIFICATIONS I A. TRAFFIC CONTROL The Contractor shall be responsible for providing traffic control and posting of"No ! Parking"signs for all projects assigned. Signs shall be posted at 150' intervals a minimum of forty-eight(48) hours prior to beginning work. Under no circumstances shall signs be attached to trees, shrubs, or any other vegetation. All traffic control j measures shall be subject to approval by the Contract Administrator or designee. ! - B. WORK SITES SCHEDULE i � e Work sites shall be located throughout the entire City. Contract Administrator will provide to the Contractor a list of selected work sites. Work shall commence within ten (10) calendar days of list being provided. This list provided to Contractor shall include: 1. Street Segment I.D. No.; 2. Usage Code (Residential, Collector, etc.); 3. Street Names (Starting at and Ending at); 4. Thomas Brothers Map Page Number(s); ` — 5. Length, Width, Square Footage of Street Segment; and 6. Trash Collection Day for Given Street Segment. Contractor shall furnish the Contract Administrator with a work schedule by 7:00 a.m. on the Wednesday preceding the week the work is to commence. This work schedule shall include the information furnished by the Contract Administrator and include the date and day of the week work is to be accomplished. C. ADHERANCE TO REFERENCES Contractor shall adhere to all of the applicable requirements including but not limited to the following: • 2000 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, "Greenbook". • 1996 Edition of the California Department of Transportation, Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones. • City of San Diego Traffic Control: "Regional Standard Drawings", TC1 -TC90 Page 14 of 20 i Bid No.6559-04-W D. CRACK SEALING REQUIREMENTS 1. Cracks to be sealed shall be1/4" or larger. Contractor shall seal only transverse, longitudinal, block, or reflective cracks. Contractor shall not seal alligator cracked areas (consisting of several broken pieces). 2. All cracks to be sealed shall be completely clean, dry, and free of all loose material, vegetation, and any other foreign substance which may cause the sealant not to adhere to the crack wall. 3. Cracks shall be cleaned using a hot compressed air lance (HCL) apparatus. The Contractor shall clean and dry all cracks with the HCL immediately before sealing. Air exiting the lance shall be heated to a temperature sufficient enough to remove the oxidized surface from the crack walls. The HCL shall meet the following specifications: a. Compressed air capacity: 40 to 100 CFM, 75 to 150 PSI b. Heated air temperatures: 600 to 2,200 °F c. Exit heated air: 1,000 ft./sec. d. Propane: 5 to 20 PSI 4. Prior to beginning work the Contractor shall submit documentation certifying � g� g , that each HCL apparatus to be used on the project meets the above specifications. This documentation is required at the start of new projects. If a lapse in the project exceeds seven (7) working days, re-certification is required and documentation shall be resubmitted. 5. Crack sealant material used shall be Road Works 306, or CRAFCO Polyflex Type 3, or an approved equivalent. Sealant shall be prepared and applied to the pavement cracks in conformance with all manufacturers' instructions except where noted otherwise in this document. 6. Sealant shall be applied from the bottom of the crack up to the surface in a manner which does not result in sealant bridging or entrapping air pockets. The sealant shall be applied to a slightly overfilled condition and then leveled with a squeegee. The overband shall not exceed 1-'/z" on either side of the crack. i 7. Cracks not cleaned or sealed shall be rejected and all costs incurred for removal and replacement of the rejected areas shall be borne exclusively by the Contractor. i Page 15 of 20