The URL can be used to link to this page

01/26/2006 .1 - � '• GOR RAH0 TER R CE t Sanua"'26,2006 22795 Barton Road. Gr'andTerrace , California 92313=5295- ; 'Civic Center'J +i' (909)'824-6621 -Fax(909)783-7629 4 Fax(909)783-2600 ._ = ,CITY '11 GRAND :TERRACE M. etta'Ferrt Mayor ' Bea Cortes Mayor Pro Tem CRVCITY-COUNCIL• Herman.Hilkey Lee AnnGarcia' REGULAR MEETINGS - • •'Council Members Fhomas J.Sch�rab AND 4TH,Thursday ^:6::00, p.m. _`City Manager = Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic-Center; .. ' 22795 Barto'ri Road ;: _ J CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL.MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 26,2006 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 PM - 22195-Barton Road THE:CrrYOF.GRANDTERRAC-E:COIVII'tIESWITHTHEAMERICANS. ?�'ITHDISABILITIESrACTOE"199U.IF-Ygil:4 y.. ;.. RE DIRE:SPECIAL-ASSISTANCE`TO:1'ARTICIRATFi.IIv TFIiS,,MEETING,PLEASE CAI:L,THE,CITI'CtiERK?S.': Q _.; 4`OEFIGE`AT<(909 62EAT LEAST 48 IiOURS PRIOR TO THE IYIEETING. S .T C COUNCILiDURING:THE°iVIEETING,PLEASE COIYIPIETE=A REQUEST;, IT YOT;DESIItE;TO"ADDRE ,, SPE A 1F OR1V1-,A VAII:ABLE AT;THE ENTRANCE AND'PRESENT'IT TO<THE:CITY LERK. WTL: r R A `_ iJFONBY THE°°"MAYO TIFIETAPPROPRIATE . . _ * Call to Order- * Invocation-Pastor Salim Elias,Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS• RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 01-12-2006 Minutes Approve 2. Approval of Just Compensation for Two Parcels Within the Approve Proposed Site for the Towne Square Development ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Home of Distinction B. Proclamation-Go Red for Women Day-February 3,2006 C. Proclamation - CongenitaVHeart Defect Awareness Day - February 14,2006 D. Proclamation-National Blood Donor Month-January 2006 3. CONSENT CALENDAR ' The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar,for discussion. A. Approve Check Register Dated January 26,2006 Approve B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda COUNCIL AGENDA 01-26-2006 PAGE 2 OF 3 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION C. Approval of 01-12-2006 Minutes Approve D. Agreement Between Lighthouse Promotions and the City of Approve Grand Terrace(Grand Terrace Days) E. Travel Authorization for the Assistant City Manager to Authorize Attend the Incident Commander Hazmat Training Program in Pacific Grove,CA April 18-20,2006 F. Reject Liability Claim GTLC-05-09(Unser) Reject 4. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,the City Council is prohibited from discussing or acting on any item not on the agenda. The Mayor may request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment. 5. REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Historical&Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of December 5,2005 Accept 2. Crime Prevention Committee a. Minutes of November 14,2005 Accept B. Council Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Specific Plan No.05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative Tract Approve Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766) and Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21) to construct a 35 single family condominium development Ordinance of the City Council Approving Specific Plan No. 05-02 (SP-05-02) for a condominium subdivision with 35 single family detached units on a 3.7 acre site located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue at 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05- 21) Mitigated Negative Declaration as Provided by the California Environmental Quality Act Resolution of the City of Grand Terrace Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM 17766)for a 35 Single Family Residential Condominium Development in the City of Grand Terrace COUNCIL AGENDA 01-26-2006 PAGE 3 OF 3 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Appoint Council Representative to Bi-County Policy Appoint Advisory Committee for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor B. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Program Authorize Year 2005-2006 Re-Allocation CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN • THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,FEBRUARY 9, 2006 AT 6:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 02-09-2006 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 02-02-2006. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-JANUARY 12,2006 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of,Grand Terrace,'was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on January 12, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Chairman Bea Cortes, Vice-Chairman ti Herman Hilkey,Agency Member Lee Ann Garcia,Agency Member Jim Miller, Agency Member Tom Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Richard Shields,Building& Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff s Department ABSENT: Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager APPROVAL OF 12-08-2005 MINUTES a% ` CRA-2006-01 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the December 8, 2005 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes. 11 TRANSFER OF PARCEL #276-261-14 TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUILDING THE BLUE MOUNTAIN VILLAS/SENIOR CENTER PROJECT CRA-2006-02 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN CORTES, CARRIED 5-0,to Approve the transfer of Parcel#276-261-14 to the City of Grand Terrace for the purpose of building the Blue Mountain Villas/Senior Center Project. Chairman Ferre adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:15 p.m.,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, January 26,2006, at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace - STAFF REPORT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE: -'.',,-, = " CI7A,ITEM(X) COUNCIL ITEM O� MEETING DATE:January 26;2006.- SUBJECT_: APPROVAL OF JUSTCOMPENSATION FORTWO - PARCELS WITHIN THE PROPOSED SITE-.FOR THE' TOWNE SQUARE DEVELOPMENT " FUNDING REQUIRED: YES Q NO (X) - On February 15,2005,the Agency entered into,a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA")with Dennis D. Jacobsen Family Holdings II, LLC. The Agreement calls for," development of a shopping center on four parcels to be sold to the Developer by the Agency and on up to eight additional parcels dependent upon the Developer's ability to acquire those parcels from third party owners. The Developer has acquired all but two of those additional parcels. , The properties at 22115 Barton Road and 22273 Barton Road have not been.acquiredd.- To facilitate development of the full shopping center Agency staff has had..the two parcels appraised. The appraisals value the parcel at 22273 Barton Road at Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($760,000) and the parcel at 22115 Barton Road at Five Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars ($520,000). The'appraisals may be examined by Agency Board members in the office of the Executive-Director. Agency staff proposes to make offers to acquire the parcels. The offers will be conditioned upon the Agency Board's subsequent ratification by Board consideration of an acquisition agreement. Thus no binding agreement will be created until the DDA is amended to require the Developer to provide.the funds for the acquisitions. The Government Code requires that a public entity, prior to making an offer to acquire real property, establish an amount which it believes to be just compensation. In no event shall the amount be less than the approved appraisal of the property. RECOMMENDATION: THAT THE AGENCY APPROVE THE APPRAISALS AND DETERMINE THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE APPRAISALS CONSTITUTES JUST COMPENSATION FOR THE PROPERTIES TO BE ACQUIRED. CPR/k AQ f DA STEM NO. 8� jbiL Al 0w; il-,& ASI Est tjt. t'k Wear Red for Women,Day February 3, 2006 WHEREAS, diseases of the heart are the nation's leading cause of death and stroke is the third leading cause of death;and < WHEREAS,cardiovascular diseases(CVD)are the leading cause of death among women;and WHEREAS, heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases claim the lives of more than half a million women each year—more than the next seven causes of death combined, and nearly twice as many as all', forms of cancer including breast cancer;and WHEREAS,the cost of cardiovascular diseases and stroke in the US is estimated at$352 billion;and WHEREAS,one in five females in the United States have some form of cardiovascular disease;and WHEREAS,63 percent of women who died suddenly of coronary heart disease had no previous symptoms of this disease;and ��<�I WHEREAS,February is designated as American Heart Month;and WHEREAS, the American Heart Association is launching a new campaign, Go Red For Women, to , encourage women to pay attention to their hearts and help them live longer,stronger lives by reducing their risk for cardiovascular disease, NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the Cityof Grand Terrace,does hereby proclaim February 3,2006 as "Wear Red for Women Day"in the City of Grand Terrace and urge all citizens to wear red in recognition.0f family,friends and neighbors who have suffered from heart disease,and as a show o support to fight it. !f This 2614 day of January,2006. Mayor Ferr,6 Mayor Pro Tenj Cortes Council Member Hilkc,. y Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller kn. j if -rw v V t r 43, UP A Day for Hearts: Congenital Heart Defect Awareness Day February 14, 2006 bm—� WHEREAS,on this day,traditionally set aside for Valentine's Day,we are surrounded by hearts, universal and unending symbols of.life, love and hope. At this same time, we are reminded of the presence of congenital andacq uir&,heart-disease in-,children and congenital heart disease in adults. -, 'Congenital heart diseases are-31hose&isdng:at birth, and.*,with,increased awareness, we are pleased to report that more and more;d1agnoses are being identified than ever before;and WHEREAS, congenital heart diseases are among.the most common birth defects and are the leading causes of defect-related deaths. In fact,more than 40,000;infants,or out of every 100,are born with a congenital heart4isease each year in the United States;and WHEREAS, with more education,information,understanding and testing of the symptoms and K physical signs ofthis disease,we can succeed in increasing survival rates. There are 1.2 million American ' '!5 children and adults living with congenital heart disease today,who are experiencing outstanding qualities of life and are serving as inspirational role models for all; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, does hereby proclaim February 14,2 0 0 6.as'"A Day for Hearts: Congenital Heart Defect Awareness Day"in the City of Gran d Terrace and urge all citizensto learn more about congenital heart defects andto recognize the dedicated cardiac doctors and researchers who strive to assist those affected by the condition. With increased education and research, children and adults with CRDs may lead longer and more active lives. This 26'day of January,2006. Mayor Ferri Mayor Pro Tem Cortes Council Member Ailkey, Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller cF V A _R , / All 0-2 Ae WN k t National Blood Donor Month January 2006 f WHEREAS, in our community, there is a need for 400 units of blood each day for the protection 6fpadents,and there is a need for additional healthy,regular volunteer donors to join the ranks of those who already give of themselves so generously; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, does hereby pay;"<"- tribute to the thousands of residents who donate blood to save lives by recognizing the month of January as "National Blood Donor Month an the City of Grand Terrace and urge all citizens in e good health to donate regularly and all civic and service organizations and businesses, if th y;- have not already done'so, to form blood donor groups to provide blood for others. This 26'day of January, 2006. Mayor Ferri Mayor Pro Tem Cortes Council Member Hilkey Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller L`-7 , U Check-Register I d January -26, -2006 vchlist- Voucher List . --. -;Page•'-` 1 , 01%20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE` .' Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice` Description/Account A_ mount 56853 1/17/2006 005584 PETTY CASH 01172006 PETTY CASH FOR DOG SHOT CLINIC 10-200-15 200.00 Total : 200.00 56854 1/19/2006 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY Dec.'2005 Dec. Electricity 10-805-238-000-0.00 534.19 16-5107238-000-000 _ 3,644.35 26-600-238-000-000 49.80 26-601-238-000-000 4.1.50 26-602-238-000-000 , 58.10 Total : 4,327.94 56855 1/26/2006 010563 ALLDREDGE, AMINA 01092006 2005 Med. Reimbursement Benefit 10-120-139-000-000 110.38 - Total : 110.38 56856 1/26/2006 010178 ALMAREZ,ALEXIS 01002006, 2005 Med. Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 104.00 Total : 104.00 56857 1/26/2006 001213 AT&T Dec. 2005 Dec. long distance 10-808-235-000-000 8.12 Total : 8'.12 56858 1/26/2006 010293 AVAYA, INC. 2722782061 MAINTENANCE FOR PHONE SYSTEM &VOICE M, 10-180-246-000-000 183.46 Total : 183.46 56859 1/26/2006 010280 AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS 167979 Pet chips& memberships 10-190-256-000-000 512.50 Total : -512.50 56860 1/26/2006 001381 BARHAM CONSULTING SVCS 53033 Services 9/8- 10/11/05 10-175-255-000-000 2,000.00 10-180-255-000-000 175.00 r ��(� pt� //�� ,,�� 7 Page: 1 Voucher-L-ist ------- -------- --Page:----2 --- -- 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56860 1/26/2006 001381 BARHAM CONSULTING SVCS (Continued) 53034 Services 10/13- 12/15/05 10-180-255-000-000 100.00 10-175-255-000-000 2,350.00 53035 Oct. 5 &6, 2005 inspections 21-021-40-00 500.00 Total : 5,125.00 56861 1/26/2006 010060 BOUSTEDT, MICHELLE 01092006 2005 Med Reimbursement Benefit - 10-370-139-000-000 121.60 Total : 121.60 56862 1/26/2006 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 7898191957601 Dec. fuel 16-900-254-000-000 248.27 10-180-272-000-000 571.30 Total : 819.57 56863 1/26/2006 001762 CITY CLERKS ASSOC/CALIFORNIA 01092006 2005/06 Dues-Brenda Mesa 10-125-265-000-000 120.00 Total : 120.00 56864 1/26/2006 010147 CORTES, BEA Jan. 2006 Jan. Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 400.00 56865 1/26/2006 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 09 0019 1,' CHILD CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 59.94 10-440-220-000-000 21.49 Total : 81.43 56866 1/26/2006 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B907016 PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER 10-370-230-000-000 254.20 B907207 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10-125-230-000-000 80.36 B908726 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10-125-230-000-000 101.68 Page: 2 vchlist 11.10a�i:her List l Page: 3 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56866 1/26/2006 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION (Continued) Total : 436.24 56867 1/26/2006 001937 DANKA OFFICE�IMAGING COMPANY 401451541 TONER 34-400-210-000-000 134.88 704556474 COPIER CHARGES 10-172-246-000-000 23.54 10-175-246-000-000 29.43 34-400-246-000-000 64.74 Total : 252.59 56868 1/26/2006 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 12933 PARKING CITE PROCESSING 10-140-255-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 56869 1/26/2006 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 005638/6291671 SUPPLIES _ 10-180-245-000-000 :,89.16, r, 005707/601226-1 SUPPLIES - 10-440-245-000-000 -4.30 006849/50269.1z SUPPLIES 10-450-'245-000-000 48.76 010734/101264C SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 21.54 029290/302636C SUPPLIES 10-180-218-000-000 48.25 029704/303042E SUPPLIES 10-180-218,-000-000 25.49. 0610 002 85528 RETURN PIPE PLUG 10-180-218-000-000 4 . -7.51 Total =- 230:59 56870 1/26/2006 001935 DFM ASSOCIATES 01092006 Loose-leaf 2006.CA Elections 10-125--250-000-000- 'J`:• "_' 48.49 "Total�r=.:• -56871 1/26/2006 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 6087 ON GOING WEED CONTROL A -,CITY PARKS +` 10,-450-245-000-000 '500.00' Page:,; _ 3 vchlist VouCher_List ---- --. - ---Page: 4— -- --Ofi/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56871 1/26/2006 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (Continued) 6097 LAWN CARE 34-700-767-000-000 60.00 Total : 560.00 56872 1/26/2006 002187 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP. 00180192420 PAINT SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000=000 24.21 Total : 24.21 56873 1/26%2006 010055 EMPIRE DEVELOPMENT-SOLUTIONS 2006.183 CONSULTING 32-600-205-000-000 805.00 Total : 805.00 56874 1/26/2006 010537 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 802 JANITORIAL SERVICES. 10-180-255-000-000 170.68 815 JANITORIAL SERVICES 10-180-255-000-000 1,125.00 Total : 1,295.68 56875 1/26/2006 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA Jan. 2006 Jan. Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000=000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 400.00 ` 56876 1/26/2006 002727 FREEMAN COMPANY, J R 317151-0 PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES- 10-125-210-000-000 33.17 Total : 33.17 t 56877 1/26/2006 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 385222 R3 SUPPLIES 10-450-246-000-000 71.25 Total : 71.25 56878 1/26/2006 002901 G.T.AREA CHAMBER OF-COMMERCE 4087-AD BLUE MT OUTLOOK 10-125-213-000-000 620.00 16-900-254-000-000 347.50 Total : 967.60 56879 1/26/2006 010536 GALLS 5809269900014 Uniform Jackets Page: 4 vchlist I .._,:her List Page: 5 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56879 1/26/2006 010536 GALLS (Continued) 10-180-218-000-000 425.80 34-800-218-000-000 26.59 Total : 452.39 56880 1/26/2006 002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN Jan. 2006 Jan. Council &Agency Stipends 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 231.97 Total : 381.97 56881 1/26/2006 002867 GOLDEN PROTECTIVE SERVICES 69719 RUBBER GLOVES 10-440-228-000-000 128.98 Total : 128.98 56882 1/26/2006 010181 GOPHER PATROL Dec. 2005 GOPHER ERADICATION SERVICE 10-450-245-000-000 465.00 - Total : 465.00 56883 1/26/2006 002875 GOVT. FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 0038001 Annual Membership-L. Ronnow 10-140-265-000-000 170.00 Total : 170.00 56884 1/26/2006 002950 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 914358702 PARK LIGHTING 10-450-701-000-000 1,334.21 10-450-701-000-000 103.40 914358703 PARK LIGHTING 10-450-701-000-000 15.79 10-450-701-000-000 1.22 Total : 1,454.62 56885 1/26/2006 010039 GREER OWENS, BARRIE 01092006 2005 Med. Reimbursement Benefit 10-180-139-000-000 194.50 Total : 194.50 56886 1/26/2006 010559 GST 487234 Dec. 1 hr. service#124115 10-140-250-000-000 95.00 Total : 95.00 Page: 5 vchlist `__ Voucher List ---page:-------6-�- ----01-/20/2006--%.36.0-4A CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56887 1/26/2006 003152 HARPER& BURNS LLPN Nov. 2005 Nov. legal services 10-160-250-000-000 2,711.25 Total : 2,711.25 56888 1/26/2006 003178 HENAGON LTD COLTON 37987 3 bags sand 10-450-245-000-000 21.50 Total : 21.50 56889 1/26/2006 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN Jan. 2006 Jan. Council &Agency Stipends - 32-200-120-000=000 150.00 10-110-120-000-000 250.00 Total : 400.00 56890 1/26/2006 003216 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC. 06-11514 SEWER MAINTENANCE AND HYDROWASHING 21-573-602-000-000 2,459.25 Total : 2,459.25 56891 1/26/2006 006880 IDENTIX IDENTIFICATION SRVS Dec. 2005 Dec. Prints-Mezzanatto 10-440-228-000-000 97.00 Total : 97.00 56892 1/26/2006 010528 ISI POLY S1183579.001 Graffiti Remover-2doz. 10-180-245=000-000 117.54 Total.: 117.54 56893 1/26/2006 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 44388 INTERNET WEBSITE HOSTING 10-180-255-000-000 75.00 Total : 75.00 56894 1/26/2006 003850 JANI-KING LAX 12050077 ' CLEANING SERVICES 34-400-246-000-000. 150.00, LAX01060066 _BUILDING CLEANING - 10_-440-244-000-000 815.00 Total 966.00 56895 1/26/2006 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE Feb. 105705-00( HEALTH INS-LEE ANN GARCIA , 10-110-142-000-000 290.51 10-110-120-000-000- 18.03 Page: . 6 vchlist lvv"her List _ Page: 7 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56895 1/26/2006 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE- (Continued) Total : 308.54 56896 1/26/2006 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 6383 LAWNMOWER REPAIRS 10-180-246-000-000 - 62.27 Total : 62.27 56897 1/26/2006 010013 MAURICIO, VERA 01102006 Med. Reimbursement Benefit 10-440-139-000-000 32.34 Total : 32.34 56898 1/26/2006 010446 MILLER, JIM Jan. 2006 Jan. Council &Agency Stipends _ 10-11'0-120-000-000 250.00 32-200-120-000-000 150.00 Total : 400.00 56899 1/26/2006 004740 MMASC- 2006 Dues 2006 Dues-Steve Berry 10-1'80-265-000-000 65.00 Total-: 65.00 56900 1/26/2006 004785 MULLINS, MICHAEL 01092006 2005 Med Reimbursement Benefit 10-180-139-000-000 380.00 Total : 380.00 = 56901 1/26/2006 010560 OF SAN BERNARDINO, REAL ESTATE SE RP039/06_ _ R/W QCQUISITION-BRIDGE 47-100-250-001-000 136.00 Total : 130.00 56902 1/26/2006 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 010799 Copy paper 10-190-212-000-000 " 103:60 -1.0-190-210-000-000 26.71 .,1.0-190-212-000-000 8.03 _ 836251 ',Copy'paper&Office supplies, 1.0-440-2.10-000-000 ;4;' i." 70.40 10A40-210-000=000 r .``s - 29.fi0_ - -"10440-210-000-000 = 5.46 10-140-210-000-000 2:29 851825 -2 printer toner cartridges 10-140-210-000-000 ' 272.04 Page: 7 vchlist Voucher List - -01/20/2006—f0:38: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE _ Bank code : bofa Voucher Date., Vendor Invoice Description/Account. Amount. 56902 1/26/2006 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY (Continued) Total : 518.13 -56903 1/26/2006 005586 PETTY CASH 01162006 Reimburse petty cash 10-440-220-000-000 49.94 10-440-223-000-000 42.04 10-440-228-000-000 64.02 Total : 156.00 56904 1/26/2006 010208 RATELLE, DAZE&ASSOCIATES Dec. 2005 CONSULTING 3440b-251-000-000 1,350.00 - Total : 1,350.00, 56905, 1/26/2006 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 6251b S.B CO SHERIFF 10=410-256-000-000 1,296.67 6315 SHERIFF CONTRACT 10-410-255-000-000 3,361.50 14-411-256-000-000, - 20,911..70 10-410-256-000-000 102,637.80 Total 128,207.67 56906 1/26/2006 006504 S.B. FIRE.DEPT./HAZ.MATERIAL GT306CC HOUSEHOLD.HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES 10-190-258-000-000 2,670.50 Total : 2,670.50 56907 1/26/2006 006435 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1012 ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES 10-190-256-000-000 324.00 Total : 324.00 56908 1/26/2006 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY Dec. 2005 Dec. CNG fuel 10-180-272-000-000 47.56 10440-272-000-000 15.85 34-800-272-000-000 15.85 Total : 79.26 56909 1/26/2006 006780 STANFILL, BRENDA 01092006 2005 Med. Reimbursement Benefit 10-125-139-000-000 108.34 Total : 108.34 Page: 8 vchlist VVueher List Page: 9 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56910 1/26/2006 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 558918 10 006 z Hard drive&toner cartridges 10-380-249-000-000 171.21 9158942227 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-180-210-000-000 175.51 9158994682 Office supplies 10-370-210-000-000 85.23 Total : 431.95 56911 1/26/2006 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 13673891 RET'D MARINARA SAUCE 10=440-220-000-000 -32.67 6011015242 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 27.53 6011090161 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 35.83 6011105696 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 458.20 6011221766 FOOD SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 49.09 Total : 638.88 56912 1/26/2006 006980 TEXACO/SHELL 8000209687601 Dec. Fuel 10-180-272-000-000 42.95 Total : 42.95 56913 1/26/2006 010423 THE BLACKWELL GROUP 60106 Summary Appraisal 23-301-95-00 2,500.00 Total : 2,500.00 56914 1/26/2006 010252 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC. 6013 Balance due 20-200-723-000-000 826.48 20-200-723-000-000 8,000.00 Total : 8,826.48 56915 1/26/2006 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 577a CONSULTATION' 10-180-255-000-000 105.00 Total : 105.00 Page: 9 vchlist Voucher List _ T- -Page:- -----10-------- -- -01/20/2006-- 10:36-04AM - CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56916 1/26/2006 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1220050282 DIG ALERT MONTHLY SERVICE 16-900-220-000-000 62.00 Total : 62.00 56917 1/26/2006 007579 VARELA, CATALINA 12282005 Reimburse Conf: Mileage-Anaheim 10-440-270-000-000 29.97 Total : 29.97 56918 1/26/2006 010421 VILLAGE ENTERPRISES, DARCY MCNAB 06-11 Dec. services 10-180-255-000-000 110.00 Total : 110.00 56919 1/26/2006 010584 WALLIN, KRESS, REISMAN, ET AL. Nov. 2005 Nov. Prof. Services 23-301-95-00 3,272.50 Total : 3,272.50 56920 1/26/2006 007795 WAXIE 6927428103 SUPPLIES 10-180-245-000-000 547.69 Total : 547.69 56921 1/26/2006 007854 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 259054 PEST CONTROL 10-180-245-000-000 80.00 10-440-245-000-000 68.50 10-805-245-000-000 30.50 34-400-246-000-000 35.50 Total : 214.50 56922 1/26/2006 007920 WILLDAN 062-8353 Dec. Plan Rev& Inspec Srvs 10-370-255-000-000 237.50 10-172-250-000-000 190.00 34-400-251-000-000 1,505.00 Total,: 1,932.50 56923 1/26/2006 010519 XEROX CAPITAL SERVICES, LLC 014757761 XEROX MACHINE - 10-190-700-000-000 421.88 Total : 421.88 56924 1/26/2006 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 014836804 COPIER USAGE Page: 10 vchlist i ..cher List Page:, 11 01/20/2006 10:36:04AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 56924 1/26/2006 007987 XEROX CORPORATION (Continued) 10-190-700-000-000 480.20 Total : 480.20 56925 1/26/2006 007995 ZUG, RICHARD 12072005 Fall Abatement-CRA 34-500-724-000-000 100.00 34-700-767-000-000 85.00 34-700-765-000-000 85.00 34-700-780-000-000 85.00 10-805-245-000-000 240.00 Total : 595.00 1/12/2006 007400 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. Jan. 2006 LEASE PAYMENTS 33-300-206-000-000 23,201.25 Total : 23,201.25 74 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 205,632.52 74 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 205,632.52 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation of the City and Agency. Larry konnow, Finance Director Page: 11 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE C CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-JANUARY 12, 2006 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California;on January 12, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor Bea Cortes, Mayor Pro Tem Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Jim Miller, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Larry Ronnow, Finance Director Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director Gary Koontz, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriffs Department ABSENT: Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Raul Montano, Calvary, The Brook Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia. ITEMS TO DELETE City Attorney John Harper,indicated that item 6A.-in recognition of the comments that were made by residents and the Planning Commission at the Planning Commission Meeting the applicant has decided to dismiss his appeal and submit a revised project taking into account those comments which will be sent back to the Planning Commission and will go through the same hearing process, so therefor, 6A. Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit No.05-06(CUP-05-06)and Environmental Review Case No.05-19 (E-05-19)to allow for an"Amateur Radio Antenna Structure"with a maximum height of 75 feet and including a"yagi"antenna measuring approximately 32 ft.x 36 ft.will be taken off of the agenda. City Manager Schwab, indicated that there is no need for item 9A. Closed Session-Real Estate Negotiations- 22874 Arliss. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS -None i l Ia Council Minutes January 12,2006 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2006-01 MOTION BY COUNCILMEM 3ER GARCIA, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following Consent Calendar Items: I 3A. Approve Check Register Dated January 12, 2006 3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3C. Approval of 12-08-2005 Minutes i 3D. Audit Contract Extension(Rogers Anderson Malody& Scott) PUBLIC COMMENT i Laura Austin, 12356 Michigan,expressed her concern with Mr.Swertfeger's business being a non-conforming business. She indicated that it was stated that at the peak of his business he would have six passenger trucks or cars and six large trucks and that he has more than that in one hour. She also indicated that he states that at the beginning of his business he has fifteen drums that has old oil in it, nine bottles of gas, and eight bottles of propane. He is three times that size now in a residential neighborhood.She reported that last year he had two I fires,one was large enough that he put in a claim of fifty thousand dollars. She questioned what the City is going to do about this. She stated that he is suppose to move a telephone pole that is in the street and that he has now placed a mail box next to it. She also indicated that he doesn't keep the hours that he is suppose to as well as the numerous things that he was suppose to do and hasn't. She stated that she has spoken to John Lampe, Steve Berry and Barrie Owens and that she requested a copy of a letter from either one of them where they requested that Mt. Swertfeger do what he is suppose to do. Neither one of them had such letter. She questioned why there is a code enforcement officer if she is not made to do her job. i JoAnn Johnson, 12723 Mt. Vernon Avenue, is appreciative of the reflective dots that were installed down the middle of the lanes in the street on Mt. Vernon and Barton Road. She is out a lot at night and it helps to see the lines and thanked whoever is responsible for that. Charles Hornsby, 22656 Brentwood Street, questioned why the property at 22874 Arliss is always dealt with as a Closed Session item,he feels that the community has a right to know what is being discussed. City Manager Schwab, responded that he will review the information and complaints that Ms. Austin has brought up and will report back on the issues regarding Mr. Swertfeger's business. The dots down Barton Road and Mt.Vernon have made a big difference. This was brought up by Assistant City Manager Berry and was a good investment for the City. The house at 22874 Arliss was purchased by the County of San Bernardino in cooperation with the County of Riverside and was deeded over to a non-profit called Option House. Option Council Minutes January 12,2006 Page'3 House utilized it as a battered woman's shelter. Option House didn't take very good care of the'property and it eventually went into disrepair to the point where Option House itself abandoned it. That house sat empty for almost two years. The.City finally got the County of Riverside and San Bernardino to sell the property to us. The City spent$260,000.00 for the rehab of that property. The rehab has been done and the home belongs to the City. It is in closed session because the City is trying to sell the house like any other individual tries to sell a house. We have been negotiating back and forth with buyers. We have secured a buyer and there really isn't a need to have it under closed session this evening. The house has sold for$510,000.00 to another resident herein Grand Terrace. Once escrow has closed staff will report publicly the sale of that house. It would be difficult to negotiate back and forth and discuss their position publicly.' ORAL REPORTS 5A. Committee Reports 1. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of November 7, 2005 CC=2006-02 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES,CARRIED 5-0,to accept the November 7,2005 Minutes of the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee. 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Appoint Alternate Member(Neeb) CC-2006-03 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HIKEY, CARR]--ED 5-0, to appoint Lewis Neeb as an Alternate Member ofthe Emergency Operations Committee with a term continuing to June 30, 2006. a. Minutes of November 1, 2005 and December 6, 2005 CC-2006-04 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES; SECOND BY MAYOR FERRE, CARRIED 5-0,to accept the November 1, 2005 and December 6, 2005 Minutes of the Emergency Operations Committee. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pro Tern Cortes, reported that at the SANBAG Board of Directors Meeting they approved a Freeway Service Patrol Program. This is a program that offers services to motorists who are stranded on the freeway and it is free. She has placed pamphlets on the I Council Minutes January 12,2006 it Page 4 service at City Hall for those who are interested. She requested that the meeting be closed in memory of Edger Darreld Henning who passed away. Councilmember Garcia,reported that the fireworks committee meetings are going well. She stated that our Sheriff s Service Specialist has left and questioned the status of areplacement. City Manager Schwab, stated that we were fortunate to have Beth Powell for the short time that she was here, however, she was given the opportunity for a promotion and that Lt. Guerra is currently looking for a replacement. Councilmember Garcia, questioned what will happen in the interim. Lt. Guerra, responded that he and others in the Department will cover those duties. Councilmember Garcia, it is her hope that the new person will have insight into graffiti issues. She commended the Blue Mountain Outlook on the information that they provide to the community. She wished everyone a Happy New Year. Councilmember Miller, wished everyone a happy new year. He praised the staff for the information that was provided to the Council on the Appeal and felt that the Council was prepared. He feels that staff has done well with the removal of graffiti and that it is going away. He mentioned that there are areas that need to be concentrated on and requested that staff look at the area of Highland Apartments in the rear entrance and the Terrace Apartments. He reported that there is a truck on Commerce Ave. that is parked by the skating rink that is full of graffiti. He received a phone call from a resident that was concerned about a house on Merle Court and requested that staff look into it. Mayor Ferr6, stated that since the last Council Meeting two members of Grand Terrace and Colton area have passed away, Stanley Cooley and Helen Oberschmidt. She would like to remember these two people at the close of the meeting as well as Mr. Henning. PUBLIC HEARING-None UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, Establishing the Non-Owner Occupied/Rental Property Program CC-2006-05 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the Second Reading of an Ordinance ofthe City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, Establishing the Non-Owner Occupied/Rental Property Program Council Minutes January 12,2006 Page 5 7B. Second of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,California, Amending Title 4 of the.Municipal Code and Establishing User Fees. CC-2006-06 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Amending Title 4 of the Municipal Code and Establishing User Fees. NEW BUSINESS 8A. Accept Resignation of Planning Commissioner Whitley, set the deadline for applications and schedule a meeting date to conduct interviews and possible appointment CC-2006-07 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES,CARRIED 5-0,to accept the resignation of Planning Commissioner Brian Whitley, authorize the City Clerk to post the vacancy and accept applications through February 14,2006 and schedule interviews for February 23,2006 beginning at 5:00 p.m. to select an individual to fill the current vacancy and an alternate.- CLOSED SESSION -None Mayor Ferre adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m.,in memory of Stanley Cooley;Helen Oberschmidt and Edgar Henning, until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, January 26, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace ROMP TERR t Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006 CRA ITEM-( ) COUNCIL ITEM.(X) SUBJECT: AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIGHTHOUSE PROMOTIONS AND THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE FUNDING REQUIRED M' BACKGROUND The 2006 Grand Terrace Days Committee has been working with Lighthouse Promotions to attract new vendors, add a car show, and bring an Arts and Heritage Grove to the 2006 Grand Terrace Days. Lighthouse Promotions currently is the event planner for the Yucaipa Iris Festival which was rated the#1 event in San Bernardino County by the 2006 Press-Enterprise Reader's Poll. Staff visited the Iris Festival last year and was very impressed with the quality of the event._ Highlights of the agreement: • Lighthouse Productions will be working as an independent contractor • Their main duties are to solicit and process craft, food, non-profit&commercial vendors applications, and confirmations. • Produce a car show • Enhance the festival by upgrading the attractions, bringing in artists, hands-on crafters, and unique displays • Total cost for services is$6,750 All revenue from vendors fees will be payable directly to the City of Grand Terrace. Past history shows vendor revenue around$3,500. Using this income figure, the projected net cost for Lighthouse ` Promotions services to the City will be approximately$3,250. The Grand Terrace Days Committee raises approximately$30,000 in sponsorships that contribute to the production of the Grand Terrace Days Parade and Festival. There is no line item in the current budget for any General Funds to be used.for this event. The City Attorney has reviewed, made several changes to, and approved the contract with Lighthouse Promotions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the contract with Lighthouse Promotions for services described in the attached contract for Grand Terrace Days 2006. I c,,^-T. G Aft �� •AC - , j This Agreement is made by and between the City of Grand Terrace (the "City") and Lighthouse Promotions and Event Planning ("LP") for Promotions and Event Planning for Grand Terrace Days 2006. 4 1. LP is working as an independent contractor and the City is not ! responsible,for Federal or State taxes, Workers Compensation, Unemployment, Social Security, or other such coverage. Evidence of liability,insurance is to be filed with the Community Services -Department.prior to the use of the facility. . 2: LP shall solicit and process craft, food, non-profit &commercial vendors applications and confirmation. The City will have the right to review all vendor applications and approve all participating vendors. i The City expects a minimum of 50 commercial and arts/crafts vendors (not including non-profits)and 6 food vendors. If this goal is not reached, the payment required by City shall be reduced by ten percent (10%). LP shall be responsible to send all vendor fees collected to the City within 15 days of receipt. All payment by vendors shall be made payable to-the City of Grand Terrace-- GT Days. No vendor will be allowed to participate in the festival without payment having been received by the City unless authorized by the City. Vendor Rates: - $50 for commercial vendors $25 for non-profit, Grand Terrace-based organizations I • $75 for commercial food vendors • No charge for Kids Attractions (non-electrical). The City will j be paid 20% of the gross generated. LP shall be.responsible for vendor placement, vendor related issues, and . !, staffing the check in on the event date. Check in will begin at 7 a.m. The i City shall have the final authority for any vendor related issues. I I J 1 LP shall coordinate with the City to mark the vendor booths,at.Rollins'Park_,_;', , the day before the event. LP shall provide an event map/layout-at.least, one week in advance of the event date. LP shall provide an Arts and Heritage Grove*working with the:City,to,- provide the following vendor types: -Potter (The City will provide any electricity needed to operate thee-equipmentin the Arts and Heritage Grove. For commercial vendors,-there will-be,an additional charge to be determined) _ -Caricature Artist -Basket Weaver -Candlestick maker -Wool spinner -any other type of demonstration artist *The City must approve all fees/expenses prior to contracting with the demonstration artists. Tenting for,demonstration artists will be negotiable LP shall be responsible for organizing and running a Car Show to be' , located on the middle field of•Rollins Park. -The Car Show must be set up by 9 a.m. on June 3, 2006. Car Show Entrants may not participate in the Grand Terrace Days Parade. Local car clubs and car owners will-be given preference in the Car Show. The City shall review and approved any fee structure for the Car Show. 3. Vendor applications shall be collected by LP: The City may collect vendor forms at City Hall and forward the applications to LP. LP shall follow up on all vendor applications, mail confirmation packets and confirm the vendor's insurance coverage and or signed waiver. City will be.mail rout receipts to approved vendors. LP productions must provide a copy of each approved- vendor application. 4. As compensation for its performance under this agreement, LP shall be paid not to exceed $6,750. -LP shall invoice the City monthly starting February 1, 2006 for $1000 for each month payable within 15 days. The final payment of$1750 will be July 1, 2006 for a total of$6,750 except as set forth in Paragraph 2. Any additional monies due will be paid,on the final invoice. The city shall pay to LP $50 per parade entry as a generated finder fee for approved entries for the GT.Days Parade 2 i 5., .LP agrees to use the City facilities as is and will indemnify and hold harmless the City and their officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, legal and investigation f expenses, or liability of any kind of nature which the City or their officers, employees, and agents, may sustain or incur, or which may be alleged as i to them, or imposed upon them for any alleged injury to, or death of person, or damage arising out of the performance of this Agreement, the i providing of instruction pursuant to the agreement, or with the occupancy and use of the premises and facilities by LP, their officers, i employees, agents, concessionaires, patrons, or visitors, except liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 6. LP shall maintain comprehensive general liability'insurance,'naming the City and their officers, employees, and agents as additionally insured, j covering all activities associated with the use of City facilities in the amount of$1,000,000. A copy of the insurance must be submitted with the original contract prior to approval. If LP is unable to obtain required r insurance, City will obtain a policy with the premium being deducted from LP's final invoice percentage. 7. LP shall provide the City with proof of insurance. The liability insurance policy required shall contain the following clause: A.- "All rights of subrogation are hereby waived against the City of Grand Terrace, City council and elective or appointed officers or employees when.acting within the scope of their employment". B. "It is agreed that any insurance maintained the City will apply in excess of, and not contribute with, insurance provided by this policy". 1 C. "The above described policies will not be cancelled, limited or non- renewed until after (30) days written notice has been given-to the Assistant City Manager of the City." 8. LP shall obtain and maintain a current City business license. I hereby certify that I have read,:understand and agree to the above provisions, and to the "rules and regulations for the Use of City Facilities", which are attached to this agreement. Lighthouse Promotion and Event Planning I Contact Name: Phone t I Address: I 3 City: State Zip Signature Date Approved by Date Maryetta Ferre Mayor of Grand Terrace Insurance Policy# Policy Expiration Date Name of Insurance Company Phone # 4 L1Tr RAMP TER C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006 CPA ITEM (') COUNCIL ITEM (X) SUBJECT: TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND THE INCIDENT COMMANDER HAZMAT TRAINING PROGRAM IN PACIFIC GROVE, CA'APRIL 18-20TH 2O06 FUNDING REQUIRED (X) BACKGROUND The Governor's Office of Emergency Services through the California Specialized Training Institute is holding a training session April 18th-20th in Pacific Grove, CA on Hazardous Material Incident ' Commander. ,The training will cover: • Recognizing Hazardous Materials -• Assessing Chemical Hazards • Select Protective Equipment • Manage Response Actions • Find Resources and Funding — • Implement Incident Command System OSHA requires this training for any personnel who would manage an emergency response to hazmat releases. This State Certified course meets FRA, FRO and Incident Commanders levels. The funds for this trip are available in the designated budgets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the travel authorization for the Assistant City Manager to attend the Incident Commander Hazmat Training Program in Pacific Grove, CA on April 18'-20`h 2006. STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM,O COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006 SUBJECT:- REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC-05-09 (Unser) The City of Grand Terrace has received a claim for damage to a vehicle that occurred when driving over a pothole. Our Claims'Adjuster has reviewed the claim and is requesting that the City rej ect the Claim and send a standard rejection letter-to the claimant.,'A copy of the claim,is attached for your review. Staff Recommends Council: REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC-05-09 (Uriser)AND AUTHORIZE.THE CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY THE CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION.TAKEN ILE WITH: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 'RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CITY OF GRAND TERRACE TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CLAIM NO.GTL�/ 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 I , INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED t 1. Claims for death,injury to person or to personal.property must be filed not later than six months after the occurrence. (Government Code Section 911.2) NOV 10 2005 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one year after the j occurrence. (Government Code Section 911.2) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 3. Read entire Claim Form before filing. ': CLERICS DEPARTMENT i 4. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at the bottom. S. -See Page 2 for space provided to include a diagram of accident location. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. �. TO: City of Grand Terrace Date of Birth of Claimam + Name of Claimant Occupation of Claimant I r✓ Se-/" SPPcig/ CoITa�Giel� Home Address of Claimant City and State Home Telephone Number o�S3 ' er- -e v 7'Ca/! a MEL— Business Address of Claimant /a/a vQ/ene/4 pi-. City and State Business Teleohone Number /l,49 d!SCNoo / / /G _ C fa p't j Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent TClaimanf,Social Securit regarding this claim ,OM D o i When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Name of any city employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE I Date Time ' 30 0. If claim is for Equitable Indemnity,give date claimant served with the complaint: Date Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur9 Describe fully, and provide a diagram in the section provided on page 2. Wherc .I appropriate, give street names and addresses Pa LICLand measurements from landmarks: Lo C q de-n0. f le I I I• I - Describe in detail how the—b—ARAGE the—AGE or MURY occurred. be�scnbe in Detail each or AG '7iIIS i Qn y do you claim t o tarty is responsible! Co Mr�\ k hP,��e h�, }- Yl e .�� i The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: i I ' Damages incurred to date(exact): 1012/�o-� Estimated prospective damages as far as known: Damage to property.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Future expenses for medical and hospital care $ Expenses for medical and hospital care . . . $ Future loss of earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Loss of earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other prospective special damages . . . . . . . $ Special damages for. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Prospective general damages . . . . . . . . . . $ General damages . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . $ "Total estimate prospective damage. Total damages incurred to date $' Total amount clain;ed as of(laic.of presen[atioli of this claita,. a' - See Page 2.(over) TH1S C1.R]A9 MIIST BL.SIG)�EI�41�I.I�VI=1tSr SI]?1: I Was damages and/or injury investigated by police?. 1\1 CD If so,what city? Were paramedics or ambulance called? h C) If so,name city or ambulance If injurer!, state date, time, name and address of doctor of.your first visit WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY:List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: J2ovJ i and fl�t�9in�S V-qr- LULlI,CtM UP �P S ' o�Q D � Name Address Phone Name Address Phone Name Address Phone DOCTORS and HOSPITALS: Hospital Address Date Hospc Doctor Address Date of Treatment Doctor Address Date of Treatment READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims provide in the following area a of City Vehicle when you Dust saw it,and by"B"location diagram of the names of streets, including North, East, of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; South,and West;indicate place of accident by"X"and by location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1"and showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of accident City Vehicle was involved,designate by letter"A"location by"B-1"and the point of impact by"X." D l0 , r C W _ r t+fon �o/es Signature of Claimant (or person-111ipe on his/her hi-half Typed or Printed Name giving relationship to Claimant) TT Date: NOTE: CL/-)]AS Mt1S'J' B.F.F)LED WIT1-1 THE CITY Cl-.E121; (Gcvr)-mnerit Code:Section 915a}. Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Penal Code.Section 72.) r �-ECEIVED Historical & Cultural Activities Committee �Q� ` 2006 Minutes for December 5, 2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were Pauline, Gloria Ybarra, City Clerk Brenda Stanfill, Ann Petta, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen Edmundson,Frances Carter and Masako Gifford. Secretary's Report:The Minutes for November 7,2005 were read and approved on a motion by Ann, seconded by Shelly. Motion carried. Treasurer's Report:The budget shows a balance of$1,036.57. The Petty Cash balance is$287.06. Frances turned in a donation of$25.00 from Bea Cortes for the anniversary potluck dinner. Historical Report: Frances passed out copies to each of our committee members of biographical materials concerning composer Jimmy Webb. Included in these materials is a copy of Mr. Webb's composition of a song.entitled "Hymn from Grand Terrace." Also included is a copy of a short biography on Mr. Webb by Betty Trimble. Old Business:Anniversary Potluck Dinner-Our committee decided that we will have an additional salad,bread and butter table added to the table arrangements. At last year's potluck approximately 110 people attended. For this year's potluck, the projection is approximately 100 people. It was �. noted that Joyce Lester donated mints for the potluck. Scheduled to arrive at 3:30 p.m.-to decorate, are Shelly and Gloria. The rest of the committee will arrive at 4:00 p.m. to help decorate. Glass Display Case: Decoration of the display case was begun by the Lion's Club. Additional decorations will be done at a later date. New Business: Calendar for 2006 -Dates and projects for the year 2006 are as follows: May 7, 2006 - Art Show November 4, 2006 - Country Fair December 14, 2006 - Anniversary Potluck Dinner The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. The next meeting will be January 9,2006, as City Hall will be closed on January 2na Respectfully Submitted, Gloria Ybarra Secretary CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE Regular Meeting JAN 1 F1 2006 MINUTES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE November 14, 2005 (CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT 'The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular meeting at the Senior Center. Meeting was called to order at 6:06 p.m. by Chairperson,Philomene Spisak. MEMBERS PERSENT were Chairperson, Philomene Spisak, JoAnn Johnson, Dottie Raborn, Richard Rollins,,Don Bennett, Lew Neeb and Pat Smith. MEMBERS ABSENT— None. CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT.— SSS, Beth Powell GUESTS PRESENT—Robert Stewart and Debra Hurst(who submitted an application for membership). INTRODUCTIONS - Were not necessary. AGENDA was approved with the addition of item IX C. Cancel December meeting. Motion by Pat Smith and second by Lew Neeb. MINUTES for the meeting of October 10, 2005 were approved with motion by Lew Neeb and second by Don Bennett. PUBLIC COMMENT a. Debra Hurst asked if her application had gone to Council. Not yet. CORRESPONDENCE—None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Swindles (to be changed to Criminal Activities) a. Richard Rollins reported that AARP always has a list of Senior Scams. b. Beth indicated that crimes are reported but of necessity, some details must be vague. c. Several have been arrested for curfew violation. B. Parking at Grand Royal Mobile Home Park a. This item will be left on the agenda until the curb painting has been done. b. However, the City Council has passed the proposal and it is only a matter of finding the time to do the painting. Should be done soon. Is not first on the priority list. C. Grand Terrace DayF a. Niothing yet fo_"2006. ,I I D. Action Item— a. The action item regarding Jessica's Law sent to Council was read. The Council approved the adoption and the support of the law. NEW BUSINESS A. Crime Prevention Planning—Nothing new. B. Action Items—Jessica's Law approved above. C. Cancel December meeting a. Motion made to cancel December meeting by Pat Smith and second by JoAnn Johnson. Passed. REPORTS A. Summary of Law Enforcement Activity—Beth Powell, SSS a. Beth thanked all those who helped at the Halloween Haunt. Suggested that a uniformed professional might be a great asset next year. b. The Zero Tolerance sweep went very well. There were 4 arrests and 7 juveniles were cited. c. Gangs have been identified who may be responsible for vehicle burglaries and vandalism. d. Curfew is 10 o'clock, 7 days a week. Disturbances can be cited at any time. B. Citizen Patrol Report—Bob Stewart a. Hours for October were 221 and total for year to date was 2371. b. Good turnout of patrol members at the Halloween Haunt. There was a uniformed officer there. The Steppin's helped from Loma Linda. c. Zero Tolerance sweep had 5 patrol members helping. II C. Other Community Programs a. Beth really would like to have Neighborhood Watch programs,but it is very j difficult to get participation. She welcomes any ideas on recruitment. b. Pushing Crime Free Multi Housing programs. Working on the Crest, the Highlands, Grand Terrace Mobile Home Park and Grand Royal. Some will be reinspected. D. Member Reports a. Lew related holiday wishes to everyone. b. Philomene indicated she is working stockings for G.I.'s to give to children. c. Richard Rollins related his experience when he brought Jessica's Law to the City Council and was not able to say all he had intended to say. ADJOURNMENT-There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. _ Secreta?;>. iCrr;Job*}soil Community and Economic Development Department CALIF•OANIA ."7 { - r..s: a yYT .,..-.r-;."=',:'-.:.�:.:,wt�y :,•"v':,4 -'{;;�Y:.,° - ,.,r,=.t,'L%' :.'x'S�' - ski;; `i-<`-, - - ?y'r'..�7r+. - r. -:F. :11_ ,f �-3. ..?'' L', ` - "}:._ .f•::s' ..f V?..9j:. CRA ITEM ( COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006 'FUNDING REQUIRED , :- NO FUNDING REQUIRED'- X. SUBJECT; Specific Plan No:05-02(SP-05-02),Vestin,g'Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05'-03/County No. ' 17766) and Environmental, Review Case - No. 05-21 (E 05-21) to construct a 35 single family condominium development APPLICANT: The Greystone•Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities, LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7�acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt."Vernon Avenue about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of-Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.) RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing on the proposed-Specific Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map; Receive any testimony; Close the Hearing and Approve the Ordinance for Specific Plan No. 05-02 for First Reading and Approve the Resolution forApproval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 Background: The applicants are requesting approval• to construct 35 single family, detached, condominium units with garage parking (total of 70 parking spaces) and 18 open guest parking. All of the units will be two-stories in height with a "California Spanish bungalow" style. "Lot" sizes for the individual units will range from 2,676 feet to 4,341 square feet. The average "lot" size will be about 3,000 sq. ft. A common open space area of about 5,300 sq. ft. will be located in the center of the development. The site will.be accessed by a single, non-gated vehicular entrance from Mt. Vernon at its southeast corner. The internal street system will be provided by a 26 foot wide loop private street. There will also be a 26 foot wide emergency vehicle access to provide secondary access to the interior of the site. With a' proposed density of 9.5 units per acre, the applicants believe this proposed new development will act as a "transition" between the existing single family 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 0 909/ 824-6621 --Lr L L aQ2 j Tm ' E V'. . I I l homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon and the Highlands Apartments on the west side of Mt. Vernon. The-subject site is presently occupied by an older single family residence and several accessory buildings and structures which will be demolished for the new development. The topography of the site slopes downward from east to west with a grade of about 4.5%. In addition, there are substantial slopes on the perimeter of the property with the.steepest being"along the southerly boundary of the site. The Highlands Apartments which average about 17 units/acre lie to the north, west and south and are, mainly, at a lower elevation than the subject site. The proposed project will be"enclosed by a 6 foot high screening wall and a decorative fence with pilasters along Mt. Vernon. On December 15, 2005 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the City Council the approval of Specific Plan No. 05-02 (SP-05-02) and Vesting Tentative Tract No. 05-03(VTTM-05-03). The Planning Commission also approved Site and Architectural Review applications No.'s 05-19 and 05-24 (one-for each proposed floor plan) contingent upon the approval of the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Site and Architectural Review applications were for the design and appearance of the individual single family units. !t should be noted that the only requests that are before the City Council are the proposed Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 to subdivide the-subject site. The two companion Site and Architectural Review applications, SA-05-19 and SA-05724 have already been approved by the Planning Commission.. Specific Plan:. The site is located in the R3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone as is the surrounding Highlands Apartments complex. The City's Zoning Code does not contain an existing zoning classification, including the R3 Zone, that would accommodate the proposed project. Therefore, the applicants filed Specific Plan No. 05-02 to permit the requested project to go forward with the proposed development standards. The Specific Plan contains a detailed discussion of the proposed project including types of uses, architectural styles, development standards to be employed, grading/drainage discussion and proposed phasing. It also includes a description of the project setting, site i characteristics, surrounding uses and a statement as to the projects relationship to the City's General Plan. As such, the submitted Specific Plan meets the requirements of the j Government Code and will serve as the future zoning for the site. ' A copy of the proposed Specific Plan No. 05-02, as recommended for approval by the City's Planning Commission, is attached here as Exhibit A. Vesting Tentative Tract Map: f " This project is,a proposed condominium development; therefore,'the necessity for the tentative tract map. The "vesting" portion of the map means that the rules and regulations of the City at the time the filing of the tract map was deemed "complete"will apply to this project. As a condominium project, only one lot is shown on the map. Individual buyers i wii(be purchasing"air rights"to their individual unit and not an individual lot. The"'lot lines" :. shown on the site plan of the project are akin to the"lot lines" in mobilehome development and,will,not be recorded "lot lines" for subdivision purposes. The proposed vesting tentative map shows such details as the existing development on the site, existing utilities, adjacent streets, existing easements,the location of existing and proposed storm drains, the proposed BMP (Best Management 'Practices) storm filter (NPDES requirement), and a proposed 8" sewer line. Also, the street sections for Mt. Vernon and the private interior loop drive are shown. The blue line copy of the vesting tentative tract map is attached as Exhibit 1. In addition, for a detailed review of this proposal and the minutes of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this matter, please see Exhibits 2 and 3 attached to this report.. Environmental Review: After completing the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been proposed for this project. The requirements of lawforthe Mitigated Negative Declaration have been met including the mandatory-public, review period. This ,project qualifies_ for a Mitigated Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have a significant adverse.impact on the environment with the proposed mitigation conditions. The Mitigated -Negative Declaration proposed under E-05-21 for this project is attached here as Exhibit B. Recommendation: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the Ordinance for the Adoption of Specific Plan-No. 05-02 (Exhibit 4) and the Resolution of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03,(County No. 17766) (Exhibit 5). Respectfully submitted, Approved by: Z Jo ampe O,ary L. oontz As VC to Planner Community Development Director JL:jI Exhibits: Exhibit A- Specific Plan No. 05-02 (Document) Exhibit B - Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, E-05-21 Exhibit 1 - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766) Exhibit 2 - Planning Commission Staff Report for 12/15/05 Exhibit 3 - Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of 12/15/05 Exhibit 4'- Ordinance Approving and Adopting SP-5-02 Exhibit 5 - Resolution of Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 05-03 c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\SP-05-02councilrpt PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION } Document Type: Negative Declaration (Mitigated) Date: November 22, 2005 Project Title: SP-05-02,VTTM-05-03, SA-05-19, SA--05-24 and E-05-21 Project Location: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Mt.Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.) ■ Description of Project: The proposed project will be made up of 35 condominium units to be sold to individual home buyers. The project will consist of two-story single-family residential units with three and four bedrooms. It will be developed as a condominium type of subdivision. A vesting tentative tract(VTTM-05-03, County No. 17766)has been filed for this development as it is a condominium project. Sp-05-02 has been filed as a Specific Plan for this project detailing the architectural style, parking,.setbacks, access, landscaping, walls and fencing details/standards for the development. There will be two models, a Plan 1 of about 1,658 sq.ft. and a Plan 2 of about 1,771 sq.ft. SA-0519 and SA-05-24 have bee filed for each model. I Project Proponent: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities Lead Agency: Community Development Department;City of Grand Terrace Contact Person: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director (909)430-2247 Public Review Period: Began:Tuesday, November 22, 2005 Ended. January 26, 2006' Public Hearings/Meetings: Planning Commission_Thursday, December 12005 and City Council on Thursday, January 26, 2006 _ Environmental Finding: Based on an Initial Study, attached hereto, prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of approving SP-05-02,VTTM-05-03, SA-05-19, SA-05-24 and E-05-21, the said project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment with the f recommended mitigation conditions. Signature: Gary L. Koontz,-Community Development Director EXHIBIT B c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\negativedclaratonSP-05-02 21 City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Specific Plan No. 05-02, Site and Architectural,.Review Case No.'s 05-19 and 05-24, Tentative Tract No.-,6-03 and Environmental Review Case No.05-21 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace , Community Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director or John' Lampe,Associate Planner (909)430-2247- 4. Project Location: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3:7 acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750 feet southerly-of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.) 5. Project Sponsor's Name The Greystone Group,Inc.and Sequoia Equities 6. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential 7. Zoning: "R3"(Medium Density Residential) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved,including but not limited to later phases of the project,and any secondary,support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The project will be made up of 35 condominium units to be sold to-individual home buyers. It will consist of two-story single-family residential units with three and four bedrooms. The project will be developed as a condominiumtyp of subdivision. A tentative tract(TTM705-03,CountyNo.17166)has been filed as a Specific Plan for this project detailing the architectural style,parldng,setbacks,access,landscaping,walls and fencing details/standards for the development.•There will be two models,a Plan 1 of about 1,658 sq.ft.and a Plan 2 of about 1,771 sq.ft. SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 have been filed for each model. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings:(Briefly'describe the project's surroundings.) North: The Highlands Apartment Complex, Zoned R3 East: Single family-homes, Zoned R1-7.2 South: The Highland Apartment Complex,private school,and convalescent home,Zoned R3 and AP West: The Highland Apartment Complex,Zoned R3 J 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety—building and grading permits;County of San Bernardino Fire Department—plan check requirements;Riverside.Highland Water Company for water connection and service; and City of Grand Terrace Public Works for sewer connection. Community Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I I I Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: 1 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning— - ❑-Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Services Systems ❑Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics ❑Water ❑Hazards ❑Cultural Resources ❑Air Quality ❑Noise ❑Recreation ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance jDetermination: On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency): ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added 1 to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Si tune Date Gary L. Koontz Community Development Director Printed Name Title Community Development Department 2 Initial Study and Enviromnental Analysis i Evaluation of Environmental"Impacts: -A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately.supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact'.' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be.explainedwhere it.is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. -the project will-not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as proj ect-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there.is•substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or.more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR.is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an.effect from "Potential Significant Impact" to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures -from Section XVII,`Earlier Analyses,"may be-cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process,,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative-declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged-to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources-for potential impacts. (e.g., general :plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached,and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Community Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis { Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ (Source: General Plan Categories Map; and Zoning District Map—This will mitigated by the filing of a Specific Plan which will act as the Zoning for this site.) I,) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (There are no known agencies where the proposed project would cause a conflict. ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (Zoning District Map, Zoning Regulations, City Zoning ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Code) d)I Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant agricultural resources in Grand Terrace) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ minority community)? (The site is relatively small and is-vacant. It will not divide any portion of the community. ) A brief explanation to answer I: The proposed is inconsistent with some development standards of the existing R3 zoning of the site;therefore,a Specific Plan has been filed which will act as the new zoning for the site with new development standards. The Specific Plan will have to be written to conform to the requirements of State Law. The project with its modified development standards could be incompatible with nearby single family development but the potential impact will be less than significant because of the proposed landscaping and architectural design. In addition,there are no agricultural resources in Grand Terrace and no part of the community will be disrupted by this project. Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure. If approved, the Specific Plan will eliminate the conflicts with the existing R3 Zoning of the site. Community Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and,Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated H. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population.projections? (This,project is consistent ❑ ❑ ❑ with the City's General Plan and the number of units proposed is about 80%of the maximum density allowed in the existing R3 Zone.) _ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (This project is an"infill"type project;the number of unit proposed will not necessitate any expansion of services.) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ housing? (The property is presently occupied by an old single family residence which is substandard and need of renovation.) A brief explanation to answer H: The proposed project is relatively small in size. The zoning of this site has been R3 for a number of,years. The proposed --' project is only about 80%of the maximum allowed by the-existing R3 zoning. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and will not exceed population projections for the City. It will also not induce growth because of its relative small size. In addition,the property is occupied'by a substandard residence which will be replaced by the new development. III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal'result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General P1an.MEA/EIR-ES-4)' ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking?(GP MEA/EIR-II-1) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (GP ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ M EA/EIR-II-1) c d) Seiches,tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil, conditions from excavation,grading, or fill? (GP ❑ ❑ ' ❑ MEA/EIR 1I-20) g) Subsidence of the land? (GP MEA/EIR II-1,Append ❑ ❑ ❑ B) h) Expansive soil? (GP MEA/EIR II-1,Append B-4 ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 1) Unique geologic or physical features? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Department 5 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I I issues(and Support Information Sources,): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated A brief explanation to answer III: No active or potentially active fault traces cross the site. The only known potential geologic hazard to the site is from seismic ground shaking which is not unusual for any site in Southern California. This and any other geologic hazard will be mitigated by the requirements that all residential structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. Also,ajai6j&port will be required before the issuance of a grading permit or building permits for this project for the construction(A re deuces. Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure:This project must meet the requirements that all residential structures be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform Building Code. 1 I I IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR II-1 ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Append B) I) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ such as flooding? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) cl� Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ j body? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑ movements? () fl Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through ❑ ❑ ❑ direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through fsubstantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-1) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, ❑ ❑ ❑ and 97 Regional WCA Report) I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) Community Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated- A brief explanation to answer IV: The proposed project is to construct 35 single family residential units. There will be some increase in impermeable surface area;however,the existing storm drain system in the area will be handle.the additional runoff. The submitted hydrology has indicated the amount of run-off from this project. In addition,before grading permits are issued for this project all NPDES requirements will have to be met which should ensure that many of the impact to water resources will be eliminated. These requirements have been set out in the required"Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan." Also,all water for the use of this project will be provide by the local water provider,the Riverside Highland Water Company. V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ existing or projected air quality violation? (GP MEA/EIR II-14, and AQMP) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ contains an implementing action to reduce such exposure) c) Alter air movement,moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑1 ■ proposals are included in the Element) A brief explanation to answer V: The proposed project is relatively small size. With only 35 units it does not have the capacity to significantly impact the air quality of the region. There will be a very small increase in air pollution primarily from the vehicles of the new residents; however,this will not be significant. Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure. For the grading of the site where dust will be generated,appropriate dust control measures will be integrated into grading plans and activities as required by the City as part of the conditions of the grading permit. Community Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis 1 Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation t Incorporated I ,1. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result : a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ (Trans. Engineering and Planning Consultant) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ bicyclists? (TCM Ordinance 147) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (TCM Ordinance 147) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? () ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Bref explanation to answer Vl: The proposed project is to has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. He concluded that because of its relatively small size that a traffic study would not be required even though there will be some slight increase n traffi which will not be significant. In addition,he stated:"The project will have no significant traffic impacts on the adjacent streets and intersections." The export of 25,000 cubic yards of earth will be mitigated by requiring that the proposed haul route be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director to minimize the potential effects on the neighborhood. I Community Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues,(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VII. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result m impacts to: a) Endangered;threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to ❑ ❑ ❑ plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20,Append C) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-20) d). Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian, and vernal pool)? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ___ e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (GP MEA/EIR H-20) ❑ ❑ ❑ 4 1 Brief explanation to answer VII: No rare or endangered species are known to live in the urban areas of Grand Terrace. In addition,there are no desirable large trees on the site or wetland habitats. No adverse impacts to biological resources are expected from the development of this project. VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with adopted energy ❑ ❑ ❑ conservation plans? (GP MEA/EIR II-19, and Append D) b) Use non-renewable resources in a ❑ ❑ ❑ wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (GP MEA/EIR H-19, and Append B) Community Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than -No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated - Brief explanation to answer VHI: = ' No mineral resources have been identified in the City. Therefore the development of the proposed 35 residential units will not adversely impact any mineral resources. In addition,the project will have to be constructed in compliance with the energy standards of the building code. IX. Hazards. Would.the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ■ ❑ release of hazardous substance (including,but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (GP MEA/EIR II-7) b) Possible interference with ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (GT Emergency Plan, and GP MEABIR II-13) c) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ ❑' ❑ ■ potential health hazard? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Exposure of people to existing. ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ sources of potential health hazards? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ L ■ flammable brush, grass, or trees? (GP MEA/EIR II-6) 1 - r I I ' Brief explanation to answer IX: There are no known hazards on the site or the immediate surrounding area including areas of flammable brush. In addition;this is a residential project with no storage of hazardous materials other than what would normally be found in a residential setting;however,such storage will not be significant. I I I i Community.Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis r Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially :_'Less than No Significant Significant =",,Significant impact Impact Unless:- ,, Impact• Mitigation Incorporated.=; _ X. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? r " (City Noise Element) ' ❑ ;: ■' ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (City Noise Element) ❑ ■ ❑- ❑ Brief explanation to answer X. There will be some increase in ambient noise level simply from having 35 new homes on the site which is presently vacant except for one older residence; however,this increase will not be significant. In addition,the site is located just west of Mt. Vernon Avenue which.has been identified -in the City's Noise Element as an existing and future noise generator. However,,this-will be mitigate by the conditioning that this project conform to the requirement of the Building Code for interior noise insulation for any structures,impacted by noise from Mt. Vernon. Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. This development will be conditioned to comply with all requirements of the Building Code for interior noise insulation if required. The noise associated with the export of 25,000 cubic yards of earth will be minimized by the City's Noise Ordinance which restricts such activities between 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m. XI. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c) Schools? ( ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, ❑ ❑ . ■ ❑ including roads? ( ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ e) Other governmental services? ( ) ❑ ■ ❑ Brief explanation of answer XI. This proposed project for 35 single family residential units is relatively small in size. As for any residential project there will be some effect on public services but because of the relatively small size of the project all of these effects will be less than significant. In addition,there will be an increase in the City's property tax base because of the development of existing vacant land and the developer will also have to pay the school impact fee for this-project before building permits are issued. Community Development Department 11 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I 1 " - i, r Issues(and_Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than 'No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact , Unless Impact �. Mitigation Incorporated XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result"ih a need for new systems or, { supplies, or substantial alternations to the following { utilities:. a) Power or natural gas? (GP MEA/EIR II-32,II-33) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ b) Communications systems? (GP M EA/EIR H-33), c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ distribution facilities? (GP ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ j MEA/EIR II-30) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP MEA/EIR R-30) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ e) Storm water drainage? (GP a 'MEA/EIR 11-33) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ f) Solid waste disposal? (GP MEA/EIR 11-32) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ g) Local or regional water supplies? 1 (GP MEA/EIR 11-30) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Brief explanation of answer MI. ! This proposed project for 35 single family homes is relatively small in size. As for any residential project there will be some effect on utility services but because of the size of the project all of these effects will be less than significant.In addition,no individual utility has identified any problems in being unable to service this project. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: I - ' a)' Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ highway? (GP MEA/EIR 11-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ aesthetic effect? (Proposed site plan and project elevations ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Create light or glare? Brief explanation to answer XIII. The proposed project does not lie near scenic highway or will block scenic vistas. In addition,any potential aesthetic impacts will be mitigated by the conditions of the project such as the regulation of the'architectural design and the requirement for a landscaping plan. f Community Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? _ (GP MEA/EIR II-20) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Disturb archaeological resources? (GP MEA/EIR 11-20) - ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ c) Affect historical resources? (GP MEA/EIR 11-22) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ unique ethnic cultural values? (GP MEA/EIR 11-22) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ area? ( ) Brief explanation to answer XIV. No known palentological,archaelogical or historical resources exist on the site. No cultural values or sacred uses will be impacted by this project. XV. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ other recreational facilities? (GP MEA/EIR 11-21) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (GP MEA/EIR 11-21) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Brief explanation to answer XV. As the project is residential,there will be some increase in the demand for and affect on recreational resources;however; as only 35 units are involved such effects will be less than significant. In addition,there will on-site recreational facilities which will mitigate the demand for public recreation facilities. Community Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis - I I - - j Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. a) Does the project have the potential = to degrade the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 'environment, substantially reduce ;- the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or i restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples'of the major periods of California history or prehistory? j b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but ❑, ❑ ❑ ■ cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Community Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis, Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answers XVI. No Impact.The proposed project is relatively small with only 35 units. Any effects on the environment resulting from this project will either be less than significant or will be fully mitigated by the regulations of the submitted Specific Plan or the required permits such as the building and grading permits. XVII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier E1R, or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. ■ Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and E1R for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. ■ Not Applicable c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. ■ Not Applicable JL:jl Grand Terrace Community Development Dept Authority:Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References:Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),21080.1,21080.3,21082.1,21083,21083.3,21093,21094,21151;Sunstrom v. County of Mendocino,202 Ca1.App.3d 296(1988);Leonoff v.Monterey Board of Supervisors,22 Ca1.App.3d 1337(1990) c:\MyFilesUOEN\Karger\Karger2-5-05\E-04-01 Community Development Department 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis i Community and Economic Development Department CALIFORNIA I TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Community Development Department DATE: Thursday,December 15,2005 SUBJECT: SP-05-02, SA-05-19, SA-05-24, Vesting Map TTM-05-03, (County No. 17766)and E-05-21 to construct a 35 unit single j family condominium project on 3.7 acres APPLICANT: The Greystone Group,Inc. and Sequoia Equities y LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue(An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.) RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing,receive the staff report and testimony, close the hearing and approve the Resolution calling for the approval of SA-05-19, SA-05-25-and E-04-21 and recommend.to the City Council the approval of the Resolution calling for the approval of Vesting Map TTM-05-03 and the adoption of the Ordinance for SP-05-02 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct 35 single family residential units with attached garage parking for residents and open parking for guests. "Lot"'sizes will range from 2,676 square feet to 4,341 square feet. The average "lot"size is 2,941 square feet. The site will be accessed by yyT22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace: California 923' -'� — I i a single,non-gated vehicular access to Mt.Vernon at its southeast comer. The internal street system will be provided by a 26 foot wide loop private street. There will also be a 26.f6ot wide Emergency Vehicle Access to provide.secondary access to the interior of the site. The site will also include passive landscape statement adjacent to the main entry asmell as an active open space,in the.center of the development. With a proposed density of 9:5 units _per acre, the applicant believes this proposed new residential development will act as a"transitional element" between existing single-family community on the east side bf Mt.Vernon Avenue and the Highland Apartments on the west side of Mt.Vernon. The applicant further points out that this proposal will replace'an aging and poorly maintained residence in the neighborhood with"an attractive,vibrant `T neighborhood that will complement the otherwise.positive fabric ofthe community..."(The proposed request and applicants quotes were taken from page II-1 of SP-05-02,Exhibit A)' SHE-AND SURROUND AREA: The subject site is an approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the west side of Mt.Vernon Avenue about 750-southerly of the intersection of.Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street. The site is presently occupied by single family residence, a swimming pool and at least four wood'and/or corrugated metal accessory structures. All of these buildings are located on the northerly side of the site. The existing structures and other facilities on the site will.be demolished and the site will be cleared for the proposed project. The site still contains numerous mature trees as part of the existing residential development: The i topography of the site slopes from east to west. The existing site slopes about 4.5%in a westerly direction with Mt.Vernon Avenue as the high point of the subject site. The site falls nearly 25 feet from east to west and steps down creating three more or less level pad areas at its westerly end. There are substantial slopes throughout the perimeter of the property with the steepest being along the southerly edge. It should be pointed out that the Highlands Apartments to the north,_west and south of the site mainly lie at a lower-elevation than the subject site. As noted above,the surroundin&area is developedmith the Highlands Apartment complex-to the north,west and south. The area to the east on the easterly side of Mt.Vernon Avenue is developed with single family residential uses. The Highlands Apartment complex consists of two-story structures while most of the homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon are one-story in height. The average.density of the Highlands is.about 17 dwelling units per acre based on past calculations by Staff. Mt. Vernon Avenue is a 88 foot-wide Secondary Highway as shown on the City's Circulation Element. It is developed with curbs, gutters and meandering sidewalks on its westerly side at this location. No request have been made by the City's Public Works department for right-of--way or street improvements. The City's Master Plan of Storm Drains shows no storm drains along this section of Mt. Vernon excepting for a short 24" segment bringing water across Mt. Vernon from the east side to the west side located at the south end of the site. �• • 1 I For an aerial view of the site and surrounding area,please see Attachment 1. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING: ! The site is located in the R3(Medium Density Residential)Zone. This site has been zoned for multi- r family use for at least 20 years. The site is also located in the"MDR"(Medium Density Residential) " Category of the City's General Plan. The-proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and falls within the density limitations of the R3 Zone. The maximum density allowed in the R3 Zone is 12 units per acre. At 35 units,the overall density of this project is approximately 9.5 units/acre which is consistent with the R3 Zone: The properties to the north,west and south of the subject site are located also in the R3 (Medium DensityResidential)Zone.Properties to the east are located in the.RI-7.2(Single FamilyResidential -Minimum required area 7,200 sq. ft.) Zone. Both of these zones are consistent with the City's General Plan land-use categories. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Specific Plan Document: A Specific Plan document was submitted for this project and has been labeled Exhibit A. Since the R3 (Medium Density Residential)would not accommodate this proposed project,it was necessary to file a Specific Plan. In addition;the City's General Plan contains a policy that requires a Specific Plan for those project exceeding 20 or more units. A Specific Plan under Sections 65450 and 65457 of the Government Code must contain a text and a diagram or diagrams that specify all of the following in-detail: • Distribution,location,and extent of the uses of land,including open space,within the area covered by the plan. • Proposed distribution,location, extent and intensity.of major components of public and private transportation,sewage,water,drainage,solid waste disposal,energy,and other essential facilities proposed to.be located within-the area covered-by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan. • Standards and criteria-by which development will proceed and, where applicable, standards for conversation, development, and utilization of natural resources. ,I A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out the matters listed i ! above. Exhibit A contains a description of the project setting,subject site characteristics surrounding uses P P j g� J � g and a statement as to the project's relationship to the City's General Plan. It also includes a detailed discussion of.the proposed project including types of uses, architectural styles, development -' standards.to be employed, grading/drainage discussion and proposed phasing. The Specific Plan concludes with a discussion on the infrastructure which will service the new developaiert`iricliding':.: ' 'utilities, sewer service and traffic control. It should be pointed out that the SpecficPhdocument ' includes reduced copies of all of the plans and exhibits for this project. As such; the submitted Specific Plan No. 05-02 does meet these requirements--of tiet;Govemment ,:e.. Code.-As such,the Specific Plan will serve as the"zoning"for this project. An-Qf. nc i6.'adopt the Specific Plan has been prepared for the Commission's consideration for''a-reiconriendation to the City Council. The Ordinance is included at the end of this Staff Report.as.'...,, ment.25. ' Site Plan: The site plan; marked Exhibit 1, shows the proposed development consisting`of35 single family detached units distributed throughout-the development. All of the units will be two stories in'height: Interior access will be provided by a 26 foot wide interior drive with a"loop"configuratibn and with the main entrance and exit to Mt. Vernon located in the southeast corner of:theaite"`=A second "emergency only"entrance from Mt. Vernon to the site will be provided in the'nortfieast:comer to satisfy the Fire Department. -The two-story single,family residential units will be setback 19 feet from the Mt Np oniright-of- _ way and approximately 6 to 12 feet from the interior southerly,westerly and northerlyproperty lines. The typical rear setback for the homes along the northerly property line will be 9 feet;'for the homes on the southerly property line the rear setback will be typically 10.6 feet. The homes-in the interior will have larger rear setbacks of up to 14.8 feet. In addition,the single family'residential-units will be set back 10 to 13 feet from the interior drive loop system for most,of the units. The distance i between residential buildings will be 8 feet. It should be pointed out.that with some of the units setting 10 feet back of the interior drive, the individual driveways to these units will only measure 15 feet or so in length.'A full sized car parked in one of these driveways could block the sidewalk along the interior drive. A 5-foot wide sidewalk is proposed around the outside edge of the interior drive loop. Staff is suggesting that if this project is approved,it be conditioned that no individual driveway be less than 18 feet in length as.measured between the garage door and the outer edge of the sidewalk. The proposed parking includes two spaces in each'garage for a total of 76 covered spaces. Also; there are 18 open spaces for guest or visitor parking.This open guest parking is located in two areas; one near the open space area in the center of the development and the other near the southeast main entrance. In addition, potential parking on the individual driveways to each unit could provide another 70 off-street spaces. All ofthis parking is located-in the interior ofthe development and will not be readily visible from Mt. Vernon. Two cornmon open space'areas are shown on the site plan, Exhibit 1. The larger of the two is located in the center of the development, towards its westerly side. This open space will be 5,268 square feet in size. No development features are shown for this open space area excepting for a what appears to be walkway crossing through'the middle of the open area. Also, one of the open guest parking areas lies adjacent to this open space area; and an underground detention is shown at this ' location. The other open space area measures some 1,892 square feet in size and lies.just south and next to the southeast main entrance. No improvements are shown for this-latter open space-area.;- Additional outside recreational amenities will be provided in the form an exteriorpatio area for each residential unit. This patio area typically measures about 12'x 15'. A five to six foot block wall presently is constructed along the northerly, westerly{and southerly boundaries of the subject site. This development proposes to replace this fencing with a retaining wall the proposed height shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan,Exhibit 13 :•On top of this wall fo t high,screening wall is proposed along these same property boundaries: Along the Mt. Vemon ontage the fencing will include"enhanced pilasters." The location of this fencing has not been indicated.on the site plan or the conceptual grading plan. Interior residential fencing between units will be 5 ft. - 10 in. and will be painted wood with gates. For a detailed discussion of the fencing for this development,please see page II-5 of the Specific Plan. A 8 %2"x 11"reduction of the site plan has been included in this.staff report as Attachment 2. Floor Plans: i The project consists of two-floor plans with three different,alternate elevations for each of these two- floor floor plans. Both floor plans will have a two-car garage and both will be two'stories in height. According to the Specific Plan the design and layout of these units will utilize a concept called the "pocket lot." The floor plans will focus on private outdoor space. This space is created by creating a notch in the rear of the floor-plan to be occupied by the private patio pointed out above. In addition,the Specific Plan points out that"living and eating spaces orient towards this`pocket'and . create a living arrangement that enhances the connection between indoor space and private outdoor space." The two proposed floor plans have been labeled"Plan 1"(Exhibit 2)and"Plan2"(Exhibit 6). Plan 1 includes a kitchen, living, dining room, Y2 bath and garage on the first floor; and the master bedroom,two bathrooms and two additional bedroom on the second floor. The total living area of Plan 1 is 1,801 square feet. Plan 2 has generally the same layout as Plan 1 but is slightly bigger with 1,828 square feet. In addition,there is an option for a fourth bedroom with a total size.of the unit at 1,963 square feet. A 8 %2" x 11" reduction of.the floor plan of"Plan V has been attached to the staff report as i Attachment 3; and, of"Plan 2" as Attachment 4. Elevations: The architectural style of this project incorporates, according to the Specific Plan, elements from early 20`h Century California Spanish bungalows. Low pitched roofs and barrel shaped roof tile accent the Spanish character of the architecture. Stucco walls provide a modern interpretation of the use of plaster walls typical of the early Spanish bungalow style. Further,-the window shapes and I sizes provide a "street friendly presence to the home." The use of decorative wrought iron and shutters will accent the home and complement the Spanish style. The proposed colors will be subdued while highlighting the California Spanish bungalow style. 1I i , The proposed alternate elevations for Plan 1 and Plan 2 are shown on Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 for Plan 1 and Exhibits 7, 8,and 9,for Plan 2. 8 %z"x 11 reductions of Plan 1 alternates are included here as Attachments 5, 6,and 7 and Plan 2 alternates as Attachments 8, 9;-and 10. -' PreliminM Landscaping_, The preliminary landscaping plan is shown on Exhibit 10. The preliminary landscape plan shows a generalized plant pallette including trees,shrubs,vines and groundcovers and generalized location of various plantings. ,A more detailed discussion of the proposed-"plant palette"is given on page 114 of the Specific Plan. In addition, the "Plant Legend" on Exhibit 10 shows that all of the proposed trees will be 24"and 36"box in size. As shown on the preliminary landscaping plan, the applicant will include in the landscaping the adjacent parkways along Mt.Vernon. The Municipal Code requires the planting of street trees every 40 feet along both the street frontage,if necessary as there are already street trees along this section of Mt.Vernon. The applicant will be required to plant and maintain the adjacent parkway. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan will be required to be submitted and to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition,all of the landscaping will have.to be installed prior to the final occupancy of the development. A 8 %z"x 11"reduction of the preliminary landscaping plan is shown as Attachment 11. s` 2 Tentative Tract May: This is a proposed condominium development;therefore,the necessity for the tentative map. The tentative map is shown on Exhibit 11. The County number issued by the County Recorder's Office is"Tract No. 17766." As a condominium project,only one'lot is shown. Individual buyers will be purchasing"air rights"to their individual unit and not an individual lot. The conditions of approval ` include the requirement that there be a homeowners' association which will have the responsibility of managing and maintaining this development. The"lot lines"shown on.the site plan are"akin" to the."lot lines"-in a mobilehome development and will not be-recorded"lot lines"for subdivision purposes. The proposed tentative map shows such details as existing development on the site,existing utilities, adjacent streets,existing easements,the location of existing and proposed storm drains,the proposed BMP storm filter and the proposed 8" sewer line. Also, the street sections for Mt. Vernon and the private interior loop drive are also shown on the tentative tract map. The"vesting"portion means that the rules and regulations of the City at the time the filing of the map is deemed"complete"will apply, by law, to this subdivision proposal. Lastly, this tentative map was reviewed by the City Engineer and found to be acceptable. AS Y?x 11"reduction of the tentative map is attached hereto as Attachment 12. o� 1 [ j j Conceptual Grading: _ I The conceptual grading plan is shown on Exhibit 12. The proposed site will be graded to drain from east to west at an average grade of 5.0%. East to west fall will be approximately 20 feet with the easterly edge of the site having a high point of 1,087.50 feet and the lowest pad on the west end of the site being 1,065.40 feet.Retaining walls will be used on nearly all ofthe south,west and northern' boundaries•of the site. No retaining walls will needed along the Mt. Vernon-frontage., The maximum retaining wall height will-be 10.5 feet along the southeasterly side of the project. Most of the retaining wall heights,however,will range from 3 feet to 6.5 feet. The grading of the site will, generate approximately 25,000 cubic yards of export. To mitigate the export operation, Staff suggests that conditions be imposed to limit the hours of grading of the site and that the.proposed haul route for the exporting trucks be approved by the Community Development Director.prior to the issuance of any grading permits. f Storm water will be collected via an underground storm drain system and outlet through the retaining wall near the southwest corner of the site. This storm drain system will also accept off-site water currently being accepted onto the subject property from Mt. Vernon Avenue. The storm water will exit the site via an outlet through the retaining wall onto the neighboring apartment site to the west. The site,will also generate an additional flow due to the addition of non-pervious materials. This additional flow will be detained on site in an underground detention system underneath the open space,pocket park in the center of the development. The proposed-structural BUT to treat the site water will be a storm filter or equivalent that will be employed to comply with the City's Storm water Ordinance as part of the NPDES requirements. This BMP will be designed to treat the"first flush"in a storm event as well as nuisance water from irrigation. A 8 V2" x 11" reduction of the preliminary grading plan is shown on Attachment 13 in the staff report. Phasing: This project is proposed to be "phased" consisting of three phases. A detailed discussion of the proposed phasing is given on page H-5 of the Specific Plan. A condition requiring the submittal of a phasing plan/schedule to be approved by the City has been included in the Resolution-of.Approval, Attachment 23 for the Site and Architectural Review applications. Color and Material Board: A"Color and,Materials"board for this project will be made available at the public hearing for the Planning Commission's information and review. The board contains the color scheme that will be used throughout the project along with of the stucco and roof tile. The applicant has described these colors as"subdued"but highlighting the architectural style of the residential units. 1 REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: ' The following comments were made by various local.agencies in reviewing Please refer to the comment made by the Department of Environmental Healt il;tn ts':no',' 'on dated October 3,2005 (Attachment 14). Colton Joint Unified School District: Please refer to the comments made by the Colton Joint Unified School District:in'its.letter dated October 3,.2005. (Attachment 15) The City Engineer: Please see the revised memorandum to Stafffrom.the City Engineer on this,.project dated December 8,2005. (Please see Attachment 16). City Traffic Engineer: Please refer to the comments made by the city traffic Engineer in his memoranda to Staff dated October 9,2005 and December 2,2005 (Attachment 17 and Attachment 18) Building and Safety: Pleaser refer to the comments made by the Director of Building and Safet Rublic Works in his memorandum of October 10,2005 (Attachment 19). County of San Bernardino Fire Department. Community Safety Division: Please refer to the comments made by the County Fire Department in its letter dated November 1, 2005 (Attachment 20). Riverside Highland water CompM. Please refer to the letter to staff from the Riverside Highland Water Company dated November 3, 2005. (Attachment 21). .Sequoia Equities: Please see the letter from the adjacent property owner,Sequoia Equities,all for connection of sewer and storm water drainage systems to cross the adjacent property to the west in order to service the subject site. The letter is dated November 14, 2005 (Attachment 22) — l i i TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: I •I . The project proponent will be required -to pay traffic.-signal improvement' and circulation improvement fees as set forth by Ordinance No. 190. Said fees for medium density development are $80/unit for the signal improvement fee and$650/unit(District B)for the circulation improvement fee. These fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project to construct 35 single family detached condominium units in the has qualified for a Mitigated Negative Declaration under the provisions of the California Environmental-Quality Act in that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the Negative Declaration and the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist with the mandatory finding of no impact for this project are attached hereto as Exhibit B. FINDINGS: j Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that specific findings be made by the Planning Commission in approving a site and architectural review application. These findings have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Attachment 23) for the requested two Site and i Architectural Review applications. In addition, the City's Subdivision Ordinance requires that specific findings be made prior to the • approval of the tentative map. These findings are: a) The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements is consistent with the General Plan; and' b) The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development;and c) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidable injure fish orwildlife or their habitat; and i d) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; and i e) The proposed subdivision,. its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of the City's Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law. i I Specific findings based on these requirements have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Attachment 24) for the tentative map which will be heard and acted on by the City I Council. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: .f. Upon the approval-by the Planning Commission, the proposed project will,,Ws ect to the recommended conditions as included in the Resolution ofApproval(Attachment<23)fai%tl3e'two site and architectural review applications. Upon approval by the City Council,the poposed7aeritative map forthe condominiums will be subject to the recommended conditions includedJiihetesolution ofApproval(Attachment 24)for the tentative map. The Site and Architectural Reyi..gWrequests will not be effective unless and until the proposed-tentative map is,approved by the City and-Counciland is recorded. ANALYSIS: This site has been zoned for R3 uses for at least 20 years. The proposed project isconsi'stent with both the City's General Plan and the Zoning"Code'. The•project will be nicely-iiesigned:*in the "California Spanish bungalow"style to fit in with the surrounding residential neighliorhoo"which includes the Highlands Apartments. The development will provide a transition use:between the apartment development west of Mt. Vernon and the single•family residential usvon:theeast°°side. Finally,the applicant is proposing a condominium development with indivi"N9' me:ownership which should alleviate some of the past objections from the community about°rental:development in the City. This is a well thought out.and well designed project which.will be an asset to the"City. It will develop a vacant site which in currently development with an aging residential structure and accessory structures. RECONOMNDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed 35 single family development under SA-05-19, SA-05-24 and E-05-21 as called for by the attached Resolution of Approval (Attachment 23) subject to the approval of the tentative map, TTM-05-03 by the City Council;and that the Planning Commission recommend to the.City Council its approval of TTM-05- 03-as called for by the attached-Resolution of Approval'(Attachment 24) for the condominium tentative map and that the Planning Commission recommend to the City,Council the approval of the' Specific Plan No.05-02 and the Adoption of the Ordinance for Specific Plan-No.05-02.(Attachment 25) Respectfully submitted, ' ZS ihn Lampe, Ass fate P anner Gary L. oontz, C unity Development Director GLK:JL:jl EXHIBIT A Specific Plan No. 05-02 document EXHIBIT B Mitigated Negative Declaration with initial Study EXHIBIT 1 Site Plan of project I i EXHIBIT 2 Plan 1 - floor plan EXHIBIT 3 Plan 1 - alternative#1.elevation EXHIBIT 4 Plan 1 -alternative#2 elevation EXHIBIT 5, Plan 1 -alternative#3 elevation EXHIBIT 6 Plan 2- floor plan EXHIBIT 7 Plan 2-alternative#1 elevation EXHIBIT 8 Plan 2 - alternative#2-elevation EXHIBIT 9 Plan 2 - alternative#3 elevation EXHIBIT 10 Preliminary Landscaping Plan EXHIBIT 11 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 EXHIBIT 12 Preliminary Grading Plan ATTACHMENT 1 Aerial photograph of site and surrounding area ATTACHMENT 2 8 %2'.x I I"reduction of site plan ATTACHMENT 3 8 %2'x 11"reduction of Plan 1 floor plan ATTACHMENT 4 8 %2"x 11 reduction_of Plan 2 floor plan ATTACHMENT 5 8 %2"x I I" alternative#1 for Plan 1 ATTACHMENT 6 8'%2'x I I" alternative#2 for Plan 1 ATTACHMENT 7 8 Y?x I I" alternative#3 for Plan 1 ATTACHMENT 8 8 %2'x 11" alternative#1 for Plan 2 ATTACHMENT 9 8%2"x 11" alternative#2 for Plan 2 ATTACHMENT 10 ' 8 %2"x 11" alternative#3 for Plan 2 ATTACHMENT 11 8 %2"x 11"preliminary landscaping plan ATTACHMENT 12 8 %2"x 11"vesting TTM-05-03 ATTACHMENT 13 8 %2"x I I"preliminary grading plan ATTACHMENT 14 Comments from the Department of Environmental Health dated 10/03/05 ATTACHMENT,15 Letter from the Colton Unified School District dated 10/03/05 ATTACHMENT 16 Memorandum from the.City Engineer dated-10105105 ATTACHMENT 17 Memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer dated 10/09/05 I ATTACHMENT 18 Memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer dated 12/02/05 ATTACHMENT 19 Memorandum from the Director of Building and Safety dated 10/,10/05 ATTACHMENT 20 Letter from the--County of San Bernardino Fire Department dated 10/10/05 ATTACHMENT 21 Letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company dated 11/03/05 ATTACHMENT 22- Letter from Sequoia Equities dated 11/14/05 ATTACHMENT 23 Resolution of Approval for SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 ATTACHMENT 24 Resolution of Approval for Vesting TTM-05-03 ATTACHMENT 25 Ordinance for Specific Plan No. 05-02 I - - I , i i I ic:`,MyFilesVOHMGerald\SF-0S-09-I0comm�epor f ' I J I f y. 'I.y„:"'f.,r�R",,n""".«'_^.'j4,r = "'y..4 sn�'*" }� �p v^e r �¢weo,L.. �1.•..,. `:","'•t..:C*','�'r£.�'� „•,.,.e,.ry, •. } {y"R r• , '? Y��}„ � _ '—•�l ��_ ��_• �� -+r -- — .. — `f1�-�. r �� ._ �... �� .—. r,. .r - ,.� 'r ... �. _ — ._ .... — — � • � .� .... T-+- [r dr. — . t'7C� �1 ,y.•gS•.0'"a d .:5,. .c'S.i.y �v -'•C• .. ;�..._.._...... ...��h'i`y •+[� �{ ' 4CS - .1 Y".. +";w ]Y - - 7'w W, •.ap," � '1!L i• 'c i7 "�� t�..� SS'�.rt92'��r•• .iS!!3:43'.SS1, .�"'S.�'i.'7'�;", . • E ! � �kl �k ;�f. 1 L,.� t7 t �,., I 4 ,.� .�. .• � .-,. .. 'l ,' 11 ^' , '�' fj 1 � 1•t {- ., ry � )• ` I F,•r •�� ``I w y, J �� jt ' I t Qz rC r t r I"Ir Imo~t' .• c o n F if i� fv�• ,;•' ...f •; . re,:� tt'", .k ; t, ,� d rat. .. , � �}, �,,,,....•,„..• .. .••t , y.��'.!'„�, � -'®°I•� , 't �. 'Ar !i':} 9� �t� "J,'!i.- !� f::�n� (f, i;. 1��r�•.� .�\: ant. ;� y; ` a�,�'' ` .I `�� j '7q w" ^.�WfS�n•mY �,_`,E.,a, t! �[rt��•c.:s :fir. ..r t v � , ,r -i �f' .L' M9,)(' iM' wX• ,' � r+.•a�',^� 3r Ir �"� r /�Fy :r 'p�^•.�sr+�''i,, iw f.., �tl I r. .w -� ..-.. .> � i '..r".-.F �'•,`h�}l: `. I,}"�� f ,t. ,.._., , ,.I 9 i-^t..I A�3 'Y Y 9�.(-,!.. A •'f..4� 1 L.t. l,,. i�.; i .y:`r '':' �LS t rmam ' y'r t tNI �r�i,i`�.v�xY• � r /��;,�,, y a:: !f" +• .l?+' ``i,.�� 7 '" ,a r,A 1 �.`:'r ., ty',nP�}..u�� •�' ,• r fY+:. � Y�'r!; 5rf ,•�'� .��v rI..i?}•r •1 t, 1 5;%.S•S �:.•. "`s �''i. ��`,t �� ,5 rur,Tt�r�, !' �1 .C� �,.. , ��... ><w. ` .� ;a � i rk�� J/,` ;t''�,�• $ 'tdrtl�;,rt. 'i.• f t +` 4''�;^wCy e'''''• aS � )l_ 1:, o {� a .�. A .yrG,�•t;C. .w_ II��M1(:,. �:."T-'� :f,t }'� rL , p'• :` Y+ - ,i :,., •� r ,• •.aas ti .. v It r •, = •ti`�' h�r,i '� 3.t ~ '} w �� -''� .. ,•f��•11tD �i k _ r,!% •S .�:r Y� �• �r,_��; -t4 .r;-R .. �1. r... ,t 'S, - n. .��r� ..�.ti .A` is-'• ``L-tar '•'1� t. •,p;l �.�: - yr.. 'y�•4' d '` Eti t \•r•• 'l ;�,�,q��^•{�y¢6 '�' �.(a••'.f .v/ �•ht q ( l,.!'� ''• r` � t.'�,, � �k�;, �r:� 1�y I:�3„ r V`,� .Sw'•s,r. ','7'•` � ( •'i* � `� �,kY'��:y 1 4• 1 ( r} r� •�;'• a;{».s tr) .f(¢' 1`wX•,;ft 'i ,��syV��.0'� _ �..n�<lPt ,,r•;}" M1a �r��,p`�tLq�,�y� ,��,..,'Lr"'�``�• .�wt !i,�";•�, f 1p F.y;� FFF�_ }{t ��"• rtd� �°s�'•.t ��^.'. !�' � r,. }��• v."„ w 41c� ,. i•�` 1 a 4,r'M1't�.a�'t'.' r v.]'r•t +L'Y'S'� •�C".�� "•�' .1" '� 1,:.. �S,'� t I j P¢c.�t�-, .�,•' C d- ,.V,��. _..i-•�,'•, �. �Ji��{��, .1 N -G .N' .l ..l Fd tvaS�• key::• •'�r,5.a �1� t, .!t".<: �a M'�:Ctl '`'•- W ;t�, �`: 10 d`�'�y -";fP"I Win'+' � l�,� 3 - �� 'Ary •;'t:•T��i,�.?�„)mr.�{•p� .,rr t �.:� �r, , i'-. ,' ¢ �i I _._.. � fir. / _ � ''�i. -•."t-�' :3a;,' 1•w{ ., /� _+". tt. ✓ :!}� �-+xib"� 1 i'r� r ��, r4�p4�','LL. i r } K� �•._t ( — f �w tl�'\ I:.., f •Y�:i. s>J7w ip l,c/1111I// {-t� ..t ' J"• �t •i''' r "7.k .�. d'r •. -�(T J ��'e(,....Y�r• Lt �` `r� ,r,� •�-°1� ,':1• �• l,i'y;. .:Mvs ;)i41A! r ~ A1�'A Sv,..,(µ•��R.w� �.. '•r w•er \ f'l�',� 'f,' .'a:.�'+•r 4.0 �1 �. Y..,•�� iy {j.,y.{ '• ` � '-��. ,�. :r.� .,,/ f.�.;.i' �;�� `7 r t 4.J +• t �I ,'I:s ♦••+ '�., i �:i•'�w ]r r`. •` •,�. Y ` { ,t- '��.1 '''r�!�' • ' .s. ,.t�.9�i S�{i'j�'r Yr`y,T�"'tF„ sts�.. .� :�a, ti, .,rt i.: t, f F'%r.•'. ,r i ,ar:.t� t "°`7 q +t' r ` �.{�.�,('fra `' �'k ''i ,y :�:rF' ,=•w'.'w�,£6. .y .al�'L'. rir�!^� �'�• ✓' w.�.� `.' � ': ``'• r=•'�:7.r �. f+ �r ��ri 1 .7_{ :^.•'I� .fit•. t:w' , -Alf .f .!t 1L•c. .,e.. �,,lt�` }•�,� i, a �. R .. �y - r, ; t 1Y•. x�� ti C 7 a r i... 'i y r.' r 1�+:+••^t r ,d.i ,.}J; (("" +; �r•,r» .L ,. o :`? tq, +•` '�=ti • ,�:�'I ' t`r� ,�y •`•ar;, � .�, •c t � t�•• •Y 'c. ;"' � � �`C I �. ,`�;i;�azd 1 '1T r',• 1�� f,i+•. C �.. Ai '9 w�'`x r 4' f .l h. t _ i �,j• `� M•�Sr�y )L•�• _ � F j; �• �- - ,j I`� ! :`k�. rF•.f ..s.,��,a , rrp i>r° r � 1 V. r ,.�. y��'�. a ^!;. ,Y t .v�"p '� t`' Y.1 '� ¢Jac,,"lF.,�,r ..f: a •:ry:f" � r� f�+� �...::J- `E8� ,=� r rt?..�F i��• 'i .�.' , ` :,��w^,+ t7 5., •1�ti «s 3 �,n,•♦t' J_'+Jc.�r'� r 1 �. •F lrYw ) ( {� � I'ttt OT'�. '1.:.v:•, � r, � ,.a h.a; b. ,,runC +• ,:y 'r.�� 7..• ',, "�s .•�,{�'y r„ �, 'i, t'Y.,l`'•h.,� .1', �,•� �' Jw�..}�w.m vlJii-r '(, ?'' v4iyrt r'i .�-- �.wT`,g .1. •yS `� r•• �t. i`,`y tA�;i '� { j'�1 ''`'t �y�,�,•�.i% t s•;L. ?:� J` ��'�i,'rt - .. -L•.-�-•--y�j�,-.-�--.�.�..,—.�, y��'':„r .r' s.I 15� $ tr a,� .1 " t .l C�S�`JS :'"� .! :,u.• p ,s f: '.�"Y'ri' ,ri �'�• (`.s` ,J'•A�r, +ab-$, 1r -,r •r7i �, rEll u dCy / ,� :. •b, - 1� ,�ii "`aag� t� t•.� t o r :'�isg r "� X ", ,, 7t9wk� sr��r L-rt7�..,,K1'�1�'rrr '•� •{ r "`Y '�/ �rATw !w ''.r,1'1 � '„i�, a'F'g �. s L rA .W .t `C %• Lt p y �! `dj+ /.rrl •1 knt t dl rx y.1 '�• `�� 'tyA.i�' i. F d J,. ! `r} , •{F 1 r 1,• w _ F. .'•c_71-1. 3"I, [r 1�. a ty. y, c '. ••n,: �F•t ��r..`• � jlr OT', �� .e.•, � �', ` �� 'f }�,��; :6• ) •t• ..�'� ��? �� ,•:•r :1= i� '! ,f ? �,g+ �'.'+'r w� l ��.• �.wV ,,• ,o �?'t 1:� � 'i.,3-r'' 4,. ..1- Q �, tat rSj°- •Afi [�{r„+- a jy' \ ,,"''F•a• "' /. /, ,:� � .vt�l , �• �'. {.,t `�.� •,y. f�:.p �'. uw.;x}f'::Pt••Apg`,,.+a�,s.r; :`>�i� ,T�,r{ �i". •, r +rx %(r > •A ;a .� ,;i,.,.� �'��E �'�.�.* j�.•!a'.� 'Y.' w ` '� ,e,, 5 '-•...• � ca�� 7. ',C is .Y. ,AS' :.fY'w ,:rs'�J) y.••/f: 4 �,�'' '� L l' ��,•j� �. �.""=.�,.: I�. r'�:L •S.. ;:k, %'•c .S t .y i .ti� t ,}t.. fl.�T, v' -� ..�, _t� -•f'v'}� � � ,l t p..,.. I � ff" !i 1. ri.�. t Y '` "' '�i'..�6}f7";r't..:�,•;�iT'�y ,!'�t�:1J` p,//: fir.• "�VVJ::'v;t�., r ` •��fq!, •� T:r i. 'y•' •w,��' ,•A' I,; rr L. ( ff '• �c!. x(v` U-•,• df`'•�S1 r� w.io�1' rYl ;1 ,Ar f r 9 t:� :l>•�i: :i'� )i. .�•.: ;�, 'ik Y•i",s '7.., •}.'` .♦ :t i�.r.r i •1� {r� ._ r,ry tr., �ell °F�r� ,�- .'A` i v i•. .r 4w '� rti' e.• „1�?, i `� ,wr i s2°'1�� Y'',S j� �`�:,.t3' ' ,�;. ry 14Cb�•� :t,.;7 - 't 'A •^tiA t'\ -' ;� d, ,tl f t }..; �'a`-L'. r%5' Y ' •t .i, qq//// ` ,, hcY•q. �y � �i'•''_'" _ r. !" .! l�.a c �Y t -t - •��`. .'r,.. y� .�e !�- r+ea r� :, • M.q.1 ••6 \• cc" g6' / �i' \'•' }}C.S .�.r C,r.. '�t l �i i Er 1' Y`�,' �•:.t r. r }' :,w•''rrr y'�,} �' ,• '�;xr7 f,.i' ;"`9• , r' ,�, � n'f" , w:t�:l •`�• 7y ":•• ,J. �,•^ ? 1 �,.1. .t r. � {•...1. ' dJ !. bki "� ?•» , ,rt��{ p; r�r� •f W,�i.D'}}a. '.•w.: .r `i��,"+�� >.� `lt'Y t ... �S, r f r i..�i{F +•..mf..�t 11 ! y [ "s•.TMir '�p�r R%5 da• I�� ,�f �i "�,' •ltyn,�'.,'`q"'„ y�� }`;} r i, r s iAt.:, k 'Ll r „f ., �~; �'r ,„!3' �. .{} ,.r pA� i t^� r: ,'.ti •' r � t4.l+ii� �� '�t-yr ,} � -: ' ,•�� '"�r a Qpr '4s, Ir :�.�� _ ,.� •,w. `�y c.�,.�y'e:9' � f �\� xr�F•:�. �w c i• .r �jm^r ¢ r' L �? \ + r F J ,°41 / fT•�dl e 2 `{. 1'.th!r,.r .7 '��, �:� ,� fi •� f':.�"' �� t�.r�:i f r j �< � `i ';Y;J �y 4}L,��/` j� ,,. �-fr• .'� Y,-, `. }t__8• '' .` a J .,'•. 4. j I .t, / •s if�t''•'aC. 1 h• 9 r.x.`� � '� a _ �\, � f!r,_ F "• 1 t `'.,i`h~2,us-' ~^ �`I r r• .�w '`+ .trr I'�' +:•,? {�'{ � �}tz� w� (� � }1r1.I3.- .}- -t .J' t,. ` '' � .,i. � rl.• ti�� •.�tir'� �,� T� ��' [ � ,� s9'.i. ..J. ` 'r''J't�,��k �1w'.}21,. •,�, •„� ,Y `•` .t.Y,.�. �r y/r' �•r ,i�}�,'m Y, 'f! � �..mow}� .._ rr�;V,R. 1 1• I , 1 1 I : I I [ .-s.. - �:F,_y� .1^��.t- ':is`,� I• 1 =,•" � I ( , •,3 _ ' I t � >" �� i"� f •I i I 1 � ) I a „' -�` _ ':tom. , , - I•• 1 i co Kt- l IIIII� 13`3 -'--r, J ' ~; +?; •",A�'.I.` _-� , . _. - I _-:I ' 1 .1. 6 .,. ✓Y'.•:_ !/ \' .II_._,!.!`.. ��'`' a •I i •h I 1 SI •r •7_ __ I \� —°.L�.).•. .9E r„ i _111E .. h' l '---r ______-�-___, _. :._s,., ,.., � ,yt:Y:.....,,;. :l^-�.,•:""' lam!;��.f'•.':-'-741n;�p: 'I;:i yF �r.-}> `:A'; - 7� -.t`:"^.>tl 1 1 j Tt`�3_ i'�T�v 8- ��i �_'?'';s`- ,`�3�? � '-` ) 'L"s v'3._ I•G t�- `L'S';- i�;� (}-�r�' �,.,,:t � I i [ •, I I ' � EASEMENTS ZONING INFORMATION: BUI DIN-SET BACKS: 1 SITESIAMMAMf: dt.wao,P•wn.n un.r vr.: n.nt un r ua.P a...Pna m sa umec�q[(9 LEGEND .o,f .•,n.o.,.n ,T M rK o u[ra uunta urt aAnm n tPlO•a•nirtiw q:�iLn aPu.lPt.lVn ' �,' lC ',fa n met. S,��,i.adu.w nn.�41if tiui"o.'.:° p> ypsty na a twry taa sr.aro,to:n,m s a.fu nn UNIT) 3) COVEKFU PMIIIIIG I7 CM GA0.18f PFi UNIT) TO n rtu..gym°•L rta ______ GUEST PARKING IE ,w s.m lm Inoroll4 mm on,:[n[ra ""w""gaa u:io m NOTE: n.mfP.:u wuu 1U)M OfIN)►A0: 1,I60)F YP,+4�nLR.mt1[II I•p I.O,eY•'rLH�4yCWorp,t • KlNILIOI.YI!•'rA00 fWut ffP a nN IiaOAPSu[[tf I YLL1 IaaFc -. - lo.nM[P Y01YNACA011[rr<t1 lore mat na,Nfn rr[ortp 1�l+l..--,p,u[•6>P�N f[It UrvflnrlR` UWK[G W—i-(.66�[s[r+f Lr,c twl ruoswf rn tnrm - y{ noan[e unaa LmJ:auw nrn.rr.,un I 11^'7;^'6�N ll II. Conceptual Site Plan IJ FUSCOE ) � �(illllkIP � u.atturw '.::��..nu�m • Green6riar t1r1,100167: er+ - 4 t w � e®aU a I I I- {� --••-•-- � I !k 3 I x+t x uil I �i6 r I - Y. I• 1 _ _ OtAL&M I I wv bra 1 � I I I - I .I I I _ W S&W -- rr. I b 's Plan 1 - -- - - -- _ t 1, 801 SF _ _ •k�:;::,!;�;., -� :F.'-;mot":; ._ TH - •'I �8cilcr�l .._-a•rp•`:;` 8.WNLAN. Green6riar r.r. city of GraM b[rae., Cal L[omia ' ... • IW+ o+ a F - ads a I xan� � � I.r.I,J I �.•- I I DDmo I I SOX 11) 1 RA�X aps.SPA PA k rs.IRS i I lwo I I I O 1 _ 1 Or['.RD.4 R1DRY 3 --- -- M6 we I 1 OPTIONAL BEDRM 4 W-% 109 I I II ill IW � Plan 2 - --- ---------------- - 1 1, 828- s . f. - 1,963 s.f. w/ Opt. Bedim. 4 �I < G � n Yu.l. 1 �•' 1' 1 I� TH0 Green6riar _ z city of Grand t.rrae., Gll Wrnl� ��*49ko K A tTrr r-r- 7T S k -- s M � � nn �t C7 ryrttr♦r rr- l r jram.. -------. ......... ..... .. _ RIGHT wt+rlw t.®.tm 1. ccus—t.S-Tll.Ao.t Plan 1 °°C. a.p°..d wft.r 7.11• "A" Elevations �• •°°°Yol.U.11 Y. Il.od Mul L.r. A.t Stu.". . slu°.I° I J. P.— Llr.C°a Jl L1VU1 r ICI R• U.°or.Llw S T!r Vul W, ..93 It ■. ALLtC V.nL TH • auln-1 � - -0• F, ROUIF - = --- Cjreen6nar Clty of Cr.nd Tarr.e., Glitornt. - J *- -- --- t . r -r r•r-r-r-r- .r._ --r r� y-r r n J X of M 1 PROM u LMJ 1f..iCkTIl' _ RIGHT wlrrl.l. yvu A. Cuncr.l.tl-tllu Anur � Y. tltuaeo Plan 1 C. ..Po..d x.rt.r Tale u. road rou. r.. raod Pol.dtlll "B" Elevations r k d LAu G. ru — u Col Vr•1 u. Vaud corG.l 1. sluaca u/ra.m n tr d. D.cm+l wa fw..:M1 41 v1n N. Drcua+llvr STaI.rNl luu►-.� L. u.u.a. 4.61 .n,r to•�.rn M. Attic went Wnt n q tl Se.ly 1 1• _y fYl'a1lNl/W -rr�e �noaia� --, --.— reen6riar M►en.rrrrY city Of Gtand t.r[.a.. Cellfornla 1 r A G 1�1P.+4 Rt FRONT B C' LOFT Wri Metwrl.ln f.epwnd A. Gonc[.te 9•Tll.Rnot .t1 B. 9tUtt Plan 1 C. 9=:d R./ter Twlls - D. /nad►e.cl. F 6. Mod P—hwl( "C" Elevations [. ..wd Bh.tt•[. G. Muod t'.lu.n 11. .n.d C.rhwl 1. n/h.a Trlt J. D lln...ullw Cw.ah .lphl _ R. D.rnntiw a TI.'r GUL I.•..n L. G Attic Vlw h'.tql: Attic w: .we iRO1� Green6riar ...r*�.� 04madam e clry. ct.nu x•[t.e..California _en[sRM ►N sF- - T \ .fl. _ Et�AR J _ Y TT 1 19 ' RICHrr wwtl.l.L•ynd P. a U-1•0-Tll•Puol Plan 2 C. SWQd;a&RSLo1 Tall. P. IWvdat-d P.L• l A Elevations F. ,I.w 6b.t bat.t. Ir- 11 U. Yood Colusn ul N. Yurd Cucb•) 11 7 St....+./Fu..hlw J. U•uur•Ll yr L'u•ub I.I VhI tl. U•au+•tivu K-TII•Uul luulu+u L. ll•cor•Liv.I;•bl•Uul Tonto[• M. 1lttlr Vent THE ■`i1i 1�•- i•-Ue Iikltil'NIAfJ Green6ria-r bmawavolmiumi �.e"W r" Clty o[Cund S•rr•c•, Gll torn)• !WMW- lag owl r�Y. k37M L . C 0 R 4 0 L~ - RR FRONT c M _ _ C r Fol �a - � _ t[I] LI 1 LEFT — RIGHT Ib teri.le 1<gen6 A. cowtt.te 5=11 It Poor Plan 2 st.— C. dpo.etl Peter T..la O. Yood P.et1. "B" Elevations is z.t�;:;; { ' 11. ta.d coteE.l I—ntiv/fae.Tr J. Oewe C- I Light A. U.toretite 9Tl lw Out loO4o re L. Mror.tit.Gobi.OuclooYwre Y. ALti.V.et O 4 ° TII stae 1 4•., °• B1Y1lT4�N aU, � .ROUP Green6riar Oily or Grand Te—ce.Gall,crnl. �b nJ }t1M A 4 F 1 fp ry I R UAR - - ---- - - - - _ 1�+Oi�iT 1: t . L 1 � LEFT ifim RIGHT mmmlimi I''"'� IYcr[ltrr I.genJ A. C°nCnu!tl It Ve°f Plan 2 !l°°°°l' I.t9c 14f1.r Tale 0 reed Ittcle ' "C" Elevations. r„i r rwa!hW lwre G. raw cul°.o x. reed c°.I,el 1. Stueee n/Ietm,Tr;r J. 0te°rer,r.i'utch 1.1 qht L. Otc°lerlrr GW,lw W.leut.lt M. 1llllt Wnl 7FIE Srt 1. 1 lr 1' 0e iWNI`AN ROUP Green6riar Clt1 uC Grand Terrace,Col;[ua,ia y.ri�q rrrsr! l7"Id p6" ,.;�.rx :n1tK.M4 Ky' �xeaJ� S , r �t��rt',serra �'� JC 11��WR in CN4 rrr�-°•fi, �.la � �+� 1 •+� , �yt.�,� F, �fr.a.e.r��T;� � � ��'2��t��tlii. WIWI 1p VD �, I "•rJ 4",. ' ��. ��ck!-x_ti�" yt.,,�_(:'.�..�t�'��(*ayli 'S7'• � �it4eS�., d�Y. rFl�t\ y (_�r�,r1-A"2'�,�ri'��t I1{�� i'r' `j �.�r ! R r ^9� �„ � ,!�!,"• k.�•' i,� �'t�r• 1 4�, 7'� �I'J I � ��Af f, t i�N '��y�-•-i.Y dB3 ' 4 H��` _ r•r k' r ,� r � �. J �� IL �.htT�"�+t�,?�4�rA�s'� O IL ILI "Now xj; +�.�,I.:w .�,y�1 t•�'f,-a.v.s� fay. n, Y rn G�.S`�gm ... 44v. �`% �. 1'",� .h'•,K�.'J.i!., oti..rygr, i - - - ---- V-ES-TINE-T-ENTATIVE TRACT MAP----- -- --------,tip NO. 17766 �1 SIlL FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, i COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Y1EIti17Td,NAP ! a da�� ; � . }• -. :.�--' �. -. _ '--.;...: t !�s.>s'u�.:"_;^r^'sr�r:,n.�•::;dar'rasxaa�rw�, � , ...,. ,R„ � _ - � ti. .: �"'.,�:eu':r,.•.,,r,.(��''++. ' III ,�„•,c'�sr^r ...�'�t•.a.an�'aa:�•vv,'._ - • :rp § ! ','' '--`= ..._ t•�. ^I 1 --- MM 81rORMAY1 I. ,ram,,..•' ,. .' 1 � .� • !'r I: �. ►'^� .-li-��4�rL� 1_!tT�N��' -�-.,1_..F•.�:M�I'? .-. ! 10 I;_ fur l r _ - 1 -'/.<��' 'T�1�'!, t.,.�i, S �.�rr...•r:,, p tp .tt e.u•..�n'r • _ _ ,dti_ - 1�. Jd r a •'t!""''tia vA�-i•�•+�.F_- I '�.:�i�•�i F'•�� 1 ! , ---'--._ .n ....,..m...,,". __ --_ - ' ,t' , 1•r t'+•'''� '\ �: / �.y,•ir'!>•Lt 'I ...-rl.:...< I, 1 [''f5•'_ _ _ - _ LSD"L'FI�4r'"(1"`JrR" '^2$'`•'"'..'^%M1e.� --- -- -----^-'-\�� :! •` ., .''�.`^:.i.�:' ' ;,+a>' /•,� �{'..rb.e ;N":.7..�'.t1�.6+_�'.,•yT'i� ;,i..•::�.:r"_ ;,�i._�� ii'�i'�_ � 'i' v^; ,j `�-�'Yr9�'S' !• s .u'}�• ; y::. '`•�,:d., ;t'..I,. ! -_I.ma�K,- L ;:: {/' '-_ ;�;`-:s:;L^t,,, - i(;:'`'; , �i:. a ' '.,2��' lffW LEURV Y0@S .IEGEAIO �' � I _�..A. i�'� '�1`•}• L11 1'-y;x"'� .i;�, r G-�%- �I 'r!i :;f.,t•.r- tt siw.�'" ^ � `'1'. �-.' 'I.. 1�--- -:C r_ J' 'fiii-1_._ 1.. .» •�b �� dM .` .1• k .n ':.b}.�.;��``, .'-C< ,�oL,.. _ .=t---ibt-�«.li-U-,ti-1—i. It _.�:�+r \~ i •r•i 4 �._` �' 1 i � ...r;,`i'n:.0 LLj,',.. �.w .,�.\\-E_-<c$�- '— - "" ,�y,'� ti.,.a �•=•^.:;.� '=a�- El". - -- - r-�.�..-:....�• _r:1_: ••:fi �I 1 � Ca:.7 Y 71_-_ -'r`A.. 1,' nta"`"wr , ', 4• �): .l\, 1. ^l;" �r .'k°';•.! ^y., - r e .�r-.,i ��:''.;y..�t'!�'" �:r. \'._� '"R' 6 s ',1.'�$:j .Nd.•3�,� r``- 1 BYAQING_SCE-BAc6$,• �r�.W,. ..�. EKG ',•!1, 'h-"` -):`•''?i'�ii' t`'•dr •r`:y�.,";,#ti'•.`- - - _ �!_ _i ,��... 'I rr. _ ,. t��', � - .irP;'`� �_s 'i a�..n:a.^..�,t M......•. `:. �nre,M r.. i .�." _- I „ -v _. .. -_._..—. _. ,r .- _•� ,' I I I SRE AR ffn, rww"e we•c "� 1 , i .,o r..r." nw I •'r{.r•' tmro,t"wwr ratty I ; I-•-�•I _ 7frAL s AI II A-A eR,PNrr•..r I,�,{,• �,,e"„'' PROPBS[B PRIVATC BRIYE �� _ —y! TYPIGL�CCTION TTPIGL EXIS17 STREO SEcnON �'=WI"� -- - - -- VESTING TENTATIVEFUSCOE -------•---------...--------- - TRACT MAP TRACT N0. 17768 �;;"' "•°' ft;;�, FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES — rr�rr _R[-],r" .rrirr•'r,e fe �Y' ] 1. I I: 'I 1 • Inv[.,1 �„\ :F i V','�t sfYcd) ; E� .•"o, r t-1 d7Kr,,r'r '.a " ' �t „+ h `\ .,, - '—'�a� ff"'S�\S -.L...�, raRMcc[r•�y,• I %' Ir I„ - ''�.`° _: ., ::_r..ad-•/. f„r i� eccna ee.o '' I , _- , r;{r},a � ,�\•' a•:•;,34. �1'Af<q 'I ° i I \.�. ! "_'a i � I J "] el°, � ._..._. r ' .ems' 'r!7n. �'_.:_ 1 �-' — r[ -•i. I `t � ., , °\';,d1 �,1 5 x \ (},+-r,. fr.:oefAO , rr.,w.. I,' 7'�M1fJ •' • I !,°`'+" Y•a r fra ;]. ..•�e,,�,. �"�`. _-- .:va,/ _I6 "•,'•'1�' r (;na ,o.•aN-�i I', r4,Jr'�"_ [�. ••.4 ,..1 _.r:,. — i .] Ilf--'.'A 1 4.' 1 'i - �I I � i 1 IN k.' °a,. .;r �'":• ,�o„n„ r.�wa r.�,.l=.>o f..rm.>e II--';?G' I ,qf I !. �- _ �• s,�r'.� I L,. __ r],Q.raf, .M] {ibiioli.a - ..- :___ bi - - >f3 - 1 ' l 2. ,y- } I 11��55 3y' 4 a i,".roam•.'+m � � r ].r, •I , �w.roee ., .) 6m. ,jm.,wu � r,w�m,.l mama', I �...._.... •__. ;.. ' �Y i' 'iI � • --- S]{ ..` le.r (i.Ttu; t —4m•'one i Irm.mn] I'1'9•Lowe o.:o].q I .i (b rg. .�� - -�.� .�;=ry_ -.'I:`:ct�:r_ .l•]� • 1 E`is��'Fi� I `� 'I . - n.:e _... _'•{. i,��".��___._. -5'�, rn]or..8.>'r.�� ox:o, r'f --�z`•" r:` .ioo]. '='� wa r, �i I` f.. ._( r`o }q. �._.. -'a� ---7I as_.,.. ....— - — —•[�:�- , , CRAPItIrSCALF . :o]wna e.r.ou,,.n u]uun°u nn mis•°I,.nw[.'roml]ra]m r]u. � - o..n e•o L][ f� "�I f14�til7uw CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANGROUP Green6riar z.W ECENE 6TEROCT 4 ZOOS Community and Economic Development qW R.cD BOUSTEDT Department MICHELLE IGimmuoity planning artment Services DeP DATE: September 21,2005 FILE NO'S: Specific Plan No. 05-02, Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-19,Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766) and Environmental Review Case No.05-21 APPLICANT: The Greyston Group,Inc.and Sequoia Equities LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt.Vernon Avenue about 700 feet south of the intersection of Mt. Vernon and Brentwood Street) SUBJECT: This project will consist of a total of a total of 35 condominium single family residential units with attached garages for resident parking and open parldng for guests. The project will consist of two plans,a Plan 1 of 1,658 sq.ft.and a Plan 2 of 1,771 sq.ft. Each plan will have three bedrooms. Dear Reviewing Agency: The applicants are proposing to construct the above described project if approved by the City. The Specific Plan has been filed for the development standards of the project. The site and architectural review applications has been filed to control the project design.. The vesting tentative map has been filed as this will be a condominium type of project with individual ownership of each unit.The environmental review application was submitted to satisfy the"CEQA"requirements for a discretionary project of this type. These applications will be heard concurrently by the City's Planning Commission. The specific plan and the vesting tentative map will also go before the City Council if the Planning Commission recommends their approval. Enclosed with this letter are copies of the proposed plans for this development including the vesting tentative tract map, preliminary grading plan, site plan, floor plans, elevations, and preliminary landscaping plan. IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE ANY COMMENTS YOUR AGENCY MAY HAVE ABOUT THIS PROJECT INTO THE 30-DAY COMPLETENESS REVIEW PERIOD LETTER, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR COMMENTS BY FRIDAY,OCTOBER 14Ty 2005 if you have any questions about this request or proposal, please do not hesitate to contact John Lampe, Associate Planner,with the Grand Terrace Community Development Department at(909)430-2247. S• cere CHS ham/ .io �.,.,.+ �r o •- (�-,d:T:.•J 6p1n Lampe,Associa Planner JL:jl Attachments: Various plans and exhibits for SP-05-02, SA-05-19,=M-05-03 &F-05-21 c:\MyFilesVOHNIGreystrnlagency.11r _ 22795 Barton Road E Grand Teri-ace, Califonia 92313-52- Colton-Joint Unifi h 1 Di bdd Dennis D.Byas,Superintendent Robert Stranger, Ph.D.,Assistant Superintendent, Business Services .,Alice H. GNndman, Director of Facilities and Construction BOARD°OF EDUCATION Mr:,Daviisii R Zamora, President Uri-Marge Mendoza-Ware,Yce Preai io ECENE Joining Together to Co the Extra V Mr.-Robert D.Anmenta, Cleric Mile ;. :Mr:.Tobin A.Brinker. OCT112005 Mr.Mark Hoover Ms Frank A.lbarra Mr:Kent"Taylor MICHELLE F. BOUSTEDT Planning/C•.)mmunity Services Department October 3. 2005 John Lampe,Associate Planner City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 RE: Tentative Tract Map 05-03 35 Condominium Units Dear Mr. Lampe: The Colton Joint Unified School District is in receipt of your transmittal for the above. named project. The District is growing at a rate faster than permanent school facilities can be financed and bulk All of our school facilities are currently at or over capacity. The District's current K-12 enrollment is 24,783 and Is expected to continue to increase. In an effort to meet classroom needs, the.Board of Education has implemented year- round schedules, and until adequate funding for facilities can be assured, the Distrid will continue to consider all altematives for housing students. In addition to General Obligation Bonds, Colton Joint Unified School District has pursued other funding strategies including the State School Facilities Program, and mitigation agreements with developers, as well as Community Facilities Districts, The proposed project Is currently within the boundaries of the following schools: Current -School Enrollment Grand Terrace Elementary School 704 Terrace Hills Middle School 1,105 Colton High,School 3.555 1212 Valencia Drivel Colton; C a 32�1799MENT -commitment to QUgj C�orsanity Mr. John Lampe October 3, 2005 Page two The current walking distances are as follows: K-6 1 mile or less 7-8 1 U2 miles or less 9-12 2 miles or less The District knows how important it is to have a comprehensive currkulum, highly qualified teachers and administrators, and schools which are accessible, adequate In size, and designed and constructed with the greatest sensitivity of students and community needs. We encourage the developer of this project to contact the District to begin discussions relative to the impact this project will have and how we can address these Issues early in the planning stage. Please contact me N you have any questions or concems. Sincerely, Alice H. Grundman Director, Facilities Planning& Construction AHG:cch l -crP 190.195.05 12/8/2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (Gre'stone Grouu,Inc.) 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue SP 05-02 AR 05-19 TTM 05-03 (17766) ER 05-21 John: Please note these conditions are just as they were the first.time around except I added a new COA (#13) and I modified the COA now shown as#17. And of course this resulted in re-numbering all COA from #14 to#31. Larry COA 1. The Final Map shall be prepared in accordance with the subdivision map act. 2. The final map shall include an easement for the private street,for all publicly owned facilities, and private utilities. 3. A Homeowner's Association shall be established for the maintenance of all on- site open spaces,private streets,water quality facilities, drainage facilities,on-site lighting, and the tract's Mt. Vernon Avenue frontage. 4. The CC&Rs shall be prepared and submitted for the City Attorney's review and �ll approval. 5. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant shall agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Condition"letter. The letter form and content to be prepared by the Community Development Department. 6. Provide a`will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company. 7. A final tract map prepared by a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor,must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing-all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract map is released for filing with the-County Recorder. 9. Prior to the final map approval, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a statement for the water purveyor indicating the project is in compliance with the fire Chief s fire flow requirements. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and-one(1)Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3 C:\DOCUME-1\JC1�TLA—I\T—OCALS-1\Terii_p\190.195.05 T�1\�i-OS-03 ('11766) SFOS- 02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07, 2005.doc A A HIM 16. I 190.195.05 12/8/2005 E ' j 10. The applicant and or owner shall provide a"Water Quality Management Plan" for the project for review and approval by the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of Building Permits/Grading Permit. The WQMP shall conform to the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program and as required and approved by the Community Development Director. The project requires a-WQMP by exceeding j the threshold as set by Category(2) Construction of 10 units or more of single family residence,multi-family residents, condominiums, apartments, etc.; and (8) the construction of Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more. 11. Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits,the applicant shall comply with the City of Grand Terrace Stormwater System Ordinance(Ordinance No. 142, Subsection 1.010, 1993)and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES f Permit for San Bernardino County as required under the Clean Water Act. 12. The applicant shall obtain all required clearances and/or permits from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to the issuance of any building i or Grading Permits. i 13. The Stormwater 360 precast stormfzlter shall be designed and submitted to the ' SARWQCB for approvals. The HOA CC&Rs shall contain instructions for the care, maintenance, and testing of the water quality facility, including, but not { limited to any restrictions to landscaping fertilizers, nitrogen, and/or pathogens. 14.A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in accordance with the standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Drainage Study shall include,but not be limited to, the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream storm drain. The study shall include the design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 15. The developer shall demonstrate that all legal rights to drain stone water onto the down stream properties to a sufficient outlet exist or the Developer shall obtain those rights prior to the Final Map approval. ' 16. Prior to recordation the downstream sewer system shall be analyzed to insure there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development. The study shall include the design of all facilities require to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts i to the sewer system. 17. The developer shall obtain sewer easements for the construction of all required downstream sewer improvements.on private property and rights to utilize the jsewer capacity ofprivately owned downstream sewer mains prior to the Final Map approval. C:\DOC A/iE-1\JOH LA—iLCCALS—I\Temp\190.15.5.05 R]Vi-05-03 (17766) SP05- 02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07. 2005.eec 190.195.05 12/8/2005 18.A preliminary soils report/Geotechnical investigation shall be prepared for the project. 19.Prior to recordation a Grading Plan shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer based on the recommendations of a Geotechnical Report. 20.All slopes over 4 feet in height shall be irrigated and landscaped. 21.Developer shall construct all missing public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue in accordance with City requirements. 22. Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer to design the facilities required by the Drainage Study and the Sewer Study. 23.Prior to any work within the Public Right-Of-Way,improvement plans shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved by the City, and an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the City of Grand Terrace. 24.All on-site and off-site curbs,gutters,paving, street lights, sewer laterals,water services,utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed prior to map recordation or a sufficient surety shall be posted to guarantee their installation. 25.Unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development, all planter areas shall be separated from parking and paved areas by a 6"concrete • curb. 26.All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt, concrete, or other Permanent,impervious surfacing material as required by Section.18.60.040B of the Zoning Code. 27. The on-site structural section for streets within this project shall be based.on the "R-value"of subgrade material after streets are brought to rough grade. The Geotechnical Engineer shall provide preliminary structural recommendations based on the City's design standards for local streets. 28. The private Street Lights and parking lot lighting shall be designed to minimize impacts to the adjacent residential units. A lighting plan shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Night lighting for the buildings and parking areas shall be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways. Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface. C:\DOCUMiE—VIE —1\T—OCALS—I\Temp\190.195.05 Tpi-4-05-03 (17766) SP05- 02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07, 2005.doc i I 190.195.05 12/8/2005 29.Prior to the issuance of any building permit,the developer shall submit a final geotechnical report addressing conformance with the preliminary soils report and - a rough grade certification prepared by the Civil Engineer 30.Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Developer shall construct all missing and/or damaged public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works or provide a surety satisfactory to the City 31.Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Developer shall construct all missing and/or j damaged public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue. I I ' I I I i f i i • i iF k • C:IDOCLJME-1VOFINLA-1\LOCALS—I\Temp\190.195.05 TRMi-05-03 (1 7766) SP05- i 02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07, 2005.doc I P.O. Box 18355 4357 Irvine CA 92623 Phone:9�49 552 fax: 8 909494 4408 e-mall:tepirvine@abeglobal.net mobile:909 263 0383 _Date: -____ October 9, 2005 To: John Lampe, Associate Planner, City of Grand Terrace From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer(TR1433) Subject: Comments on 35 unit condominium project Location: 11830 ML Vernon Av. File No: S.P. #05-02 and Architectural Review Case#05-19 1. Applicant should provide signing and striping plan for internal circulation and projed access. 2. Applicant should confirm that turn radll are adequate for internal circulation. Standard size passenger vehicles should be able to make turns without encroaching into opposing lanes. 3. Applicant should confirm that stopping sight distance at driveway on Mount Vernon Av. is adequate. ATTACHMENT17 TEP , • P.O. Box 18355 phone:949 552 4357 Irvine CA 92623 fax:909494 4408 .e-mail:tepirvine@sbcglobal.net mobile: 909 263 0383 Date. December 2, 2005 To: John Lampe, Associate Planner, City of Grand Terrace From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer(TR1433) Subject: Comments on Greystone Project Location: 11830 Mount Vernon Ave. File No: SP#05 --02 1 reviewed the response to my comments dated October 9, 2005 from Fuscoe Engineering concerning the above referenced project. The Fuscoe Engineering comments adequately respond to my comments. • I i Transportation Engineering and Planning. fnc. -TTACRIVIEN 17 1 MEMORANDUM Building and Safety/Public Works Department Conditions of Approval =rr„ys Date: October 10,2005 :Applicant. The Greystone Group,Inc. ;Address of Applicanh 341 Bayside Drive,Suite 79 Newport Beach,Ca 92660 Site Location: 11830 Mt.Vernon Avenue,Grand Terrace,Ca Telephone: 949-566-9230 W.O.P. 1241-5417 Provide two (2) of the following construction plans and information for review of the proposed project.The plans you will submit to the Planning Department can be counted as plans required by Building and Safety. The Initial plan review usually will take three weeks on most projects once Building and Safety receives the applicants package from the Planning Department. You will receive a work order number at the time you submit plans for the proposed project. A plan review fee will be charged for reviewing the plans. This fee will be determined at later date when plans are submitted for review. Permit fees will also be charged for each building. These fees are in addition to the fees paid to the Planning Department. Sets (2) Title Report (2) Record Survey (2) Street Improvement Plans,to include curb,gutter, sidewalk, and paving, street lights,etc. (2) Sewer Plans (2) Water Plans (2) Architectural Plans (2) Structural Plans (2 ) Structural Calculations (2) Plot/Site Plans (2 ) Electrical Plans (2) Electrical Load Calculations (2) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas. (2) Mechanical Plans (2) Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plane F (2) Title 24 Energy Calculation --- Page- I of 4, A-TTACHMENT 11.1 it I (2) Hydrology Study (2 ) Geology Report (2 ) Soils Report (2 ) Grading Plan (2 ) Precise Grading Plan (2 ) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) or (SWEPP) and Erosion Control Plan For NPDES (2 ) Temporary Construction Fence Plan Building and Safetv/Pnblic Works General Information All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, 2001 Mechanical Code, 2001 Plumbing Code, and the 2004 Electrical Code adopted by the State of California. Design all structures to comply for Seismic Zone(4)wind speed 70 MPH,exposure"C". The Developer/Owner is responsible sponsible for the coordination of the final occupancy, The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building&Safety.Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building and Safety Job Card. Building and Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection request can be made twenty (24) hours in advance for the next day inspection. Please contact(909) 825-3825. You may also request a inspection at the Building&Safety public counter at 22795 Barton Road,Suite"B",Grand Terrace. • Construction site shall be protected by a securityfence. The fencing g and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non-sewer type shall conform at ANSI ZA.3. All construction materials which are not used shall be recycled. Receipts from the recycle company responsible for excepting the materials shall be kept in the construction office.Copies of the receipts shall be given to the City Inspector. i Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an electrical Building & Safe No temporary permit from ty porary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items are in place and approved by Building and Safety and the Planning Department. (A) Installation of a construction trailer. or, (B) Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Public Works Conditions Pag6 2 Of 4 i 1, Install concrete sidewalk extensions beyond the rear portion of a driveway approach providing less than 2%cross fall for disabled access. All;work performed in the public right of way shall be in com liar p ce with the Public Works Construction Handbook. (Green Book) prior.°t pew applicant shall which_ aPP pay,capital improvement w h include,street park,storm drain,circulation and traffic improvement fees.Sewer Assessment Fee f: 70shall_be paid in full. District No. 1 CSA 4. All on site utilities shall be shall be underground to each structure. 5. Street cut permits are required before work begins in the right of way. Submit plans for review to the Public Works Department prior to street cuts, 6. Pursuant to Section 721.1 of the California Plumbing Code, an easements will need to be established and recorded with the County Recorder for each property. Language will need to be provided regarding the maintenance on the downstream sewer line. This language will Aneed to be part of the homeowner association agreement and also be reviewed by the City ttorney prior to recording the ftd map. G.T.M.C. Chapter 13.04, Section 140 and 13.04.160 7. All proposed public street improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed pursuant to the Business and Professions Code 8. Storm water easements will need to be established and recorded with the County Recorder for each property discharging storm water. Language will need to be provided regarding maintenance of the downstream storm water facilities. This language will need to be part of the homeowner association agreement and also be reviewed by �'the City Attorney recording the tract map. G.T.M.C. Chapter 13.20. prior to 9. Public street improvements exist at right of way. Repair any damaged sidewalk, curb or gutter due to damaged from construction. 10. Submit clearance documents from the servicing utility for the vault area next to public right of way located on the front north side of the property, Building Permit Conditions 1. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, on site water service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency. On site Fire Hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department.No flammable materials will b on the site until the Fire Hydrants are e allowed established and approved. No flammable construction materials shall be placed on the site without approvals by the Fire Department. All street and access roadways around the project shall be paved for emergency resonse p vehicles before flammable materials are placed on the ® E project. Page 3 of I 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading pad certifications shall be submitted to Building and Safety from the engineer of record Also,prior to concrete placement,submit a certification for the finish floor elevations and set backs for each structure. 'The certification need to reflect that the structure()are in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. I Prior to issuance of building permits,provide a certificate from the Colton Unified School District stating that all school fees have been paid. 4. Prior to issuance of building' g Permits,provide Building and Safety with a will serve letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909)825-4129. 5. The property shall be connected to the public sewer service. Sewer fees shall be paid prior to building permits. 6. All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems, (NPDES). NPDES reports shall be submitted with projects plans at time of plan review. 7. Dumping of debris was witnessed years ago toward the rear of this property. Provide report from the soils engineer on the abatement of the debris. C:XrnyMM%wndId=of approvaPOYSIone Ho=4 1241-5417.wpd i I �I i Page-4 of 4 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT �' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC a�v OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL COMMUNITY SAFETY DIVISION 620 South "Ell Street—San Bernardino,CA 92415-0179 1 (909)386-8465-(909)386-8463-(909)386-8466 Fax`(909)386-8460 NOVEMBER 1,2005 EXPIRATION: NOVEMBER 2006 GREYSTONE GROUP 341 BAYSIDE DRIVE,STE.7 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 FILE: MIS GTO5116168 LOCATION: 11830 MT VERNON AVE—GRAND TERRACE PROJECT TYPE: SITEIARCHITECTURE REVIEW TRACT: 17766 PLANNER:JOHN LAMPE Dear Applicant: 'With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, the San Bernardino County Fire Department requires the following fire protection measures to be provided in accordance with applicable local ordinances,codes, and/or recognized fire protection standards. The following information of this document sets forth the FIRE CONDITIONS and GUIDELINES which-are applied to this project. ❑Approved ®Approved w/conditions ❑ Not Approved • FIRE CONDITIONS: Jurisdiction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein ("Fire Department"). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department. [F-1] Water System. Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using Appendix IIIA of the Uniform Fire Code. Standard 903.1 [F-5] The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 1,250 GPM for a 2 Hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow based on 3,600 sq.ft. Structure. Fire Fee. The required fire fees (current* $131.00) shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division (909)386-8465.This fee is in addition to fire fees that are paid to the City of Grand Terrace. [F401 Access. The development and each phase thereof shall have a minimum of 2 points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. Standard 902.2.1 [F41] _ t �L IN � - MIS GT05M 6168 kovember 1,2005 PAGE 2 Turnaround. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the.end of each roadway one hundred.and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600)feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12 % grade and have a minimum of forty five (45) foot radius for all turns. In the FS1, FS2 or FS-3 Fire Safety Overlay District areas,there are additional requirements. Standard 902.2.1 [F-43]' Combustible Protection. Prior to combustibles, being placed on the project site an approved paved road with curb and gutter and fire hydrants with an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. The topcoat of asphalt does not have to be installed until final inspection and occupancy. [F-44] Water System Residential. A water system approved by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be i operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site. Detached single family residential developments may increase the spacing between hydrants to be no more than six hundred (600)feet and no more than three hundred (300)feet (as measured along vehicular travel-ways)from the driveway on the address side of the proposed single family structure.Standard 901.4 [F-54b] Water System Certification. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water any, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and v�ater system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the job-site. IF-57] f Street Sinn. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street comer to the project. Installation-of the temporary sign shall be prior any ! combustible material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection_ and occupancy of the first structure,the permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 [F72]- Hydrant Markina. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified -by the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non-paved roads exist, the blue reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three(3)feet from the hydrant and at least six(6)feet high above the adjacent road. Standard 901.4.3. [F80] i Residential Addressing. The street address shall be installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum of four (4) inches in height and with a one half(%) inch stroke. The address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be internally and.electrically illuminated with a low voltage power source. Numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street. Where the building is fifty(50) feet or more from the roadway, additional contrasting four (4) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances. Standard 901.4.4 [F81].__ , Spark Arrestor. An approved spark arrestor is required. Every-chimney that is used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel are used, shall have an approved spark arrestor visible the ground that is maintained in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. [F87] frim Additional Comments: 1) Emergency access road shall be AC paving and the gate shall have an approved Knox lock. 2) Roadway leading to lots 11, 12, 13 & 14 shall be a minimum of 26 feet. Si cerely, D9UG CRAWFORD, Planning & Engineering Supervisor San Bernardino County Fire Department Community Safety Division DC�ts 1450 E.Washington St. • Colton,CA 92324-4696 • (909)825-4128 FAX(909)825-1715 P� `-4•:�C�NSENV Ltd,0�� } November 3, 2005 Mr. John Lampe _ City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Re: Green Briar Tract#17766 Dear John; Riverside Highland Water Company has no problem with Tract #17766. However, the developer does need to contact the water company regarding water stock and other water related fees. Thank you. Sincerely, at"t 9iJ� Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RNH/ss d ATFACHMENT NOV. 16, 2005 1 : 18PM SEQUOIA EQUITIES 9252563780 NO. 3232"-P. 2 SEQUOIA EQUITIES November 14, 2005 City of Grand Terrace Attn: Gary Koontz RE: Grand Terrace Land Dear Mr. Koontz: As owners of the Highlands Apartments we have reviewed the plans submitted by the developer of the property which our apartment community surrounds, and we are agreeable, subject to our engineer's review of the final engineering plans, to allow for the connection of sewer and storm water drainage systems for the 35 homes in question, into or on-site systems for these utilities. The proposed development's preliminary plans appear acceptable, and when their final plans are complete, we look forward to reviewing those. Assuming they are in accordance with all local and state design guidelines, we see no problems. Further, we welcome the development of the 35 high quality single family homes as a welcome use for this site, which will greatly improve the current aesthetics of this site. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. North Waterford Apartments, a California limited partnership G� Its By: Sequoia Equities VII, LLC ��G �% a California limited Liability Company Its: General Partner By: Mark S. arter Its: Member Manager I Real RV, r � c TTA HMEN� 22 ' C:t^CFURfcTa EIFZEC�:. Ii i i SULe6�Ci4L�Q f�'S"erti CMG�AifiFSc C�,dE�., �G'L.ac �. �. I I LAGVXA N1GUiik szxr mEF."eC1 FAR$7.R'kHCJ§CC7 A.PR1. I RESOLUTION NO. 05 RESOLUTION OF7HE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO.05-19,SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-24 AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-21 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 35 UNIT CONDOMINIUM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CONSISTING OF A"PLAN 1" OF 1,801 SQ. FT. AND OF A "PLAN 2" OF 1,828 SQ. FT. WHICH WILL BE TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT COVERED UNDER SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-02 ON A 3.7 ACRE PARCEL AT 11830 MOUNT VERNON AVENUE, 750 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF MT. VERNON WITH BRENTWOOD STREET WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for the approval of Site and Architectural Review Case No. 05-19 and Architectural Review Case No. 05-24 and Environmental Review Case No. 04-21 to construct a 35 unit condominium single family residential project; and WHEREAS,the applicant has additionally applied for a tentative tract map,TTM-05- 03 (County No. 17766)for the condominium portion of this project to be considered by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: and WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held bythe Planning Commission on Thursday, December 15, 2005; and • WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project for 35 condominium units qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-21. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The proposed project and uses, consisting of a 35 single-family detached type condominium units with appurtenant facilities is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it meets the standards of the Zoning Code as modified by Specific Plan No. 05-02 2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, that they do not interfere wit the neighbors' privacy, that they do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the 35 unit project will be consistent with the 4 A T A C 2A-E,N7 �11 3 existing residential development in the area and the City. In addition,the site will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with existing development and the setbacks and landscaping' of the project will proved a buffer and transition to the single family homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon Avenue. 3. The architectural design of the development,its materials,and colors utilizing i earthtones are visually harmonious with surrounding residential development to the north,west and south of the subject site. The design is both functional for the proposed project and is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Said materials will match existing materials and colors within the adjacent residential areas. 4. The plan for future landscaping and open space provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the residential structures on the subject site and is harmonious with the nearby and adjacent residential developments. The proposed landscaping of the site will minimize any visual impacts to the surrounding area. 5. Because the site is mainly vacant and undeveloped with no natural vegetation and is not part of a hillside,there will be no indiscriminate clearing j of the property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides. Thus the natural beauty of the City, its setting and natural landforms will be preserved. " 6. The design and location of any signs associated with this project will be •. subject to the approval of a sign program to insure that the signs will be consistent with the scale and character of the buildings to which they are attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand . Terrace Municipal Code. 7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. i C- - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 are hereby i approved subject to the following conditions: I 1. The proposed 35 unit condominium residential project shall be maintained in conformance with the Site and Architectural Review Applications as approved by the Planning Commission on December 15, 2005. All plans shall be consistent in terms of property lines and other measurements. Minor changes or clarifications may be made by the Community Development Director or his designee. 2. The proposed colors and materials to be employed shall be in substantial conformance with the color and materials board and other exhibits shown at the public hearing on December 15, 2005. i 3. Pay all applicable development fees, park fees, and school impact fees. 4: All construction activity related to this project shall comply with the City's noise ordinance as stipulated in Chapter 8.108 of the Municipal Code. ,- 5. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be-maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 6. All mechanical equipment for this development shall be screened from public view, and all rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened from view by either the architectural features of the buildings or by screening to be `- approved by the Community Development Director. 7. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations listed in the memorandums from the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in his memorandum dated October 10, 2005. 8. The applicant shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the County Fire Department, Community .Safety Division, it its letter dated November 1, 2005. 10. A decorative wall/fence shall be provided along Mt. Vernon'Avenue. Said wall/fence shall be setback 10 feet from the Mt. Vernon right-of-way line excepting where this distance needs-to be modified because of line-of-site issues. A detailed fencing plan showing the design,appearance and location of all fencing shall be submitted to and- approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance.of any building permits. 11. A precise grading plan with soils report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading permit for this project. 12. This project shall provide at least two covered parking spaces in a garage and at least one open guest parking space for every four proposed units distributed throughout the development. 13. Three copies of landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community. Development Director for review and approval. Said plans to be prepared' by a licensed landscape architect and shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary landscaping plan exhibited at the public hearing. Said plans to be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the new construction. All landscaping and irrigation facilities shall be installed prior to the final occupancy of the any residential building. 14. The proposed landscaping for this development shall include the parkway in front of the site along Mt. Vernon Avenue. The developer or homeowner's association shall be responsible for the maintenance of this parkway ®, landscaping. ! 15. The proposed open space lot in the middle of the proposed.development I shall include some sort of active recreational amenities. A detailed plan of this open space area shall be submitted to and be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 1.6. No building or portion of a building shall be constructed v4thin the 19 foot setback as measured from the Mt. Vernon Avenue right- -way excepting { for patio covers which shall be constructed of wood. OVA 1.4,-401- AwA I I 17. No building or portion of a building or structure shall constructed closer to the northerly, westerly or southerly property lines of site than what is - shown on Exhibit 1 -the site plan.of the proposed developm Exceptions may be made for patio covers which shall be constructed of woo , however, in no instance shall a structure be closer than 5 feet to any interior property line. 18. The driveways in front of each individual garage shall have a minimum i length, as measured from the garage door to backside of the proposed sidewalk or edge of the interior loop drive where there is no sidewalk, of 18 feet. In addition, all garage doors shall be of the "roll-up"type. 19. Any signs proposed for this project shall be subject to the sign regulations of j the R3 Zone and to a separate sign permit application to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 20. All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt, concrete or other permanent, -impervious surfacing material as required by Section 18.60.040 B of the Zoning Code. I - 21. For any outside lighting proposed, a lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance i of building permits. Night lighting for the buildings and parking areas shall.be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways. Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface. 22. The developer shall pay the appropriate traffic impact fees as required by City Ordinance No. 190 prior to the issuance of building permits. 27. All contractors working on this project shall acquire a valid City business licence. 28. This approval for SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 shall not be effective until and unless the accompanying Specific Plan No. 05-02 and Tentative Tract Map, I No. 05-03 are approved by the City Council and the final map is recorded. No building permits shall be issued until the final map has been recorded. 29. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the 1 I City of Grand Terrace Stormwater System Ordinance (Ordinance No. 142, Subsection 1.010, 1993)and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the Clean Water Act. 30. A "phasing plan" indicating the proposed phasing and timing of the development shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the-issuance of building permits. 31. The approval shall not be effective until the developer/owner signs the "Acceptance of Conditions" form that he/she is aware of and accepts all of r the conditions of approval as imposed by the Planning Commission at the ` conclusion of the public hearing. 32. This approval shall expire one (1)year from the date of its approval unless the applicant has filed for a building permit. In case the applicant can not comply with this deadline, then the applicant shall apply for an extension of the one-year prior to the original expiration date. Said time extension to be granted by the Community Development Director. In conformance with Section 18.63.100 of the Zoning Code, no additional time beyond two (2) years from the date of the initial approval shall be granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of December, 2005. AYES: NOES: - ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson, City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\SA-05-19-05-24resolution F G I I I r • -.{fin.'.:7:5-T'r' RESOLUTION NO, 05_ :Y RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACC�'STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.05-03(TTM 17766)-FOR:Ak35 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOAIEWLTM DEVELOPMENTvIN: ,. THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE _ WHEREAS, the applicant, The Greystone Group Inc. and Sequoia Equities,has applied for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(TTM 17766)to create a 35 unit condominium subdivision on a 3.7 acre parcel in the City of Grand Terrace;and, i WHEREAS,the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(County No. 17766)was deemed complete on December 8,2005;and ' WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commis_sion.on.December 15,2005; and WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),Article 6,Section 15070,the proposed project for 35 condominium units qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there-is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-21;and • WHEREAS,the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Ma No. 05-03 � WHE � g . PP P (TTM 17766)to the City Council at its meeting of December 15,2005;and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on regarding the approval of Tentative Tract Map-05-03 (TTM 17766). NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE ASYOLLOWS: I • 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements is consistent with the General Plan in that the overall density and lot size conform to the General Plan and that all required improvements will be provided; i and I r i 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development in that the site is fairly level, is served by adequate public services and utilities and the project conforms to the provisions of the existing zoning; and 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that this is an urban infill project with no wildlife habitats on the site; and i TTACHMF 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that all necessary public utilities and services will be _ provided; and 5. The proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of the City's Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law in that the proposed development conforms to the Medium-Density Residential Category of the General Plan and the Zoning as established by Specific Plan No. 05-02. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Tentative Tract Map No.05-03 (TMM 17766)is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: General Conditions of Approval: 1. Details shown on the tentative tract map are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of ordinance,general conditions of approval,or City policies must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals 2. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. As a vesting map,this request was deemed complete on December 8,2005. Conditions Prior to Final-Map Approval: 4. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant must agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Conditions"form. The content of the form to be prepared by the Community Development Department. 5. Provide a"will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company. 6. Monumentation of tract map boundaries, street centerline and lot boundaries is required 7. A final tract map prepared by,or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying,or a licensed land surveyor,must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract map is released for filing with the County Recorder. 9. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map. 10. Submit a preliminary soils/geotechnical report prepared by a California registered civil engineer. i 11. Prior to final map approval,a grading plan shall be prepared by a civil engineer based on the recommendations of soils/geotechnical report. 12. Prior to the final map approval,the developer shall submit sewer plans to the City for review and approval. All residential units within the proposed condominium subdivision shall be served by the public sewer system. - 13. Prior to final map approval, a drainage study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in accordance with the standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design Manual to the satisfaction of the City. The Drainage Study shall include,but-not be limited to,the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream storm drain. The study shall include the design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the satisfaction of the City. 14. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall demonstrate that all legal rights to drain storm water onto the down stream properties to a sufficient outlet exist or the Developer shall obtain those rights prior to the final map approval. i 15. Prior to final map approval,the downstream sewer system shall be analyzed to insure there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development. The study shall include the design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the sewer system. 16. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall obtain sewer easements for the construction of all required downstream sewer improvements on private property and rights to utilize the i sewer capacity of privately owned downstream sewer mains. 17. Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer to design the facilities required by.the drainage and sewer studies 18. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall construct any and all missing public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue in accordance with City requirements. i 19. Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer for any work in the public right-of-way and shall be approved by the City; and the appropriate encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City prior to commencing any such work. i 20. Prior to final map approval,all on-site and off-site curbs,gutters,paving,street lights,sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation. 21. Prior to final map approval,plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the subdivider has entered into a contract a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment and installation of the water improvements. 22. Prior to the final map approval,there shall also be filed with the City Engineer,a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire Chief s fire flow MEW requirements. 23. The project shall be used only for residential uses. Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions (C,C&R's)shall be recorded as part of this-tract. As a minimum,these C,C&R's shall include the provisions for the establishment of'a"Homeowner's Association." The C,C& R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and City Attorney for - ---- -review-and approval prior-to-recordation.---- - - - ---- -- - - 24. The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(C,C&R's)applicable to the project property shall be consistent with the terms of this map and all City Codes. If there is a conflict between the CC&R's and any City Code or this map,the City Codes or this map shall prevail. 25. The Stormwater 360 precast stormfilter.shall be designed and submitted to the Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) for approvals. The Home Owners Association CC&R's shall contain instructions for the care,maintenance,and testing of the water quality facility,including,but not limited to any restrictions to landscaping fertilizers, nitrogen and/or pathogens. Conditions After the Final Map Approval: 26. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and one(1)Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance-Of any building permits. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,California at a regular ~ meeting held on the_day of .2006. ATTEST: City Clerk of.the City of Grand Terrace and Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof of the City Council thereof Approved as to form: City Attorney John Harper C-\MyFilesUOHNMGreystone\TI-M-05-03resolution 1 ORDINANCE NO.- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-02 (SP-05-02) FOR A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION WITH 35 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ON A 3.7 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF MT.VERNON AVE. AT 11830 MT. VERNON AVE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-21 (E-05-21)-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS PROVIDED BY THE'CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ' WHEREAS, the .applicant has -filed the necessary applications including four Site and Architectural Review cases and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to create 35 single family detached condominium units; and WHEREAS, there is no existing zone in the City's Zoning Code to accommodate the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan also requires the filing of a Specific Plan for any residential project with more than 20 units; and i WHEREAS,Section 18.90.040 ofthe Zoning Code allows for the adoption ofa Specific Plan for those unique properties where the existing zoning provisions are unique or unusual; and WHEREAS, the subject site is an infill site left after the Highlands Apartments developed • to the north,west and south; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will represent a transition between the Highlands Apartments on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue and the single family residential on the easterly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue; and WHEREAS,the resulting density of this project at 9.5 units per acre is not inconsistent with existing development in the area including the large apartment complex,the Highlands Apartments, immediately to the north, west and south; and WHEREAS, Specific Plan No. 05-02,Exhibit A,is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace; and i WHEREAS,in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an environmental review for Specific Plan No. 05-02 has been conducted and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared under E-05-21 for this project with the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) having been considered by both the Planning Commission and the City Council; and t WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held properly noticed public hearing on this project on December 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following the conclusion of the public hearing on December 15, 2005 recommended that the City Council approve Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the • associated Mitigated Negative Declaration under Environmental Review No. 05=21,set out in the attached Exhibits A and B,by adopting this Ordinance; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission in taking the above action found that the proposed Specific Plan No. 05-02 will not be: 1. Detrimental to the health, safety,morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons ,h residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the city; or .2. Injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. WHEREAS,the City Council held a properly notice public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and other relevant testimony on October 13,2005 and on November 10,2005 for SP-05-02 land E-05-21. NOW, THEREFOR, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA,DOES HEREBY'ORDAIN AS-FOLLOWS: Section 1. Specific Plan No. 05-02 to allow for the development of 35 single family detached condominiums,set out in full'inExhibit A,is hereby approved and ! 1 adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace. • �i Section 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration on file in the offices of the Community Development Department under E-05-21 is hereby approved as Exhibit B. Section 3. Effective Date:This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31'day of its adoption. Section 4 Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three(3) public places within fifteen(15)days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of . , 2006 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of 2005. i ATTEST: II City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City f Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the .2006 by the following vote: i AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill City Clerk i Approved as to form: John Harper City Attorney c:\MyFilesVOHMGreystonelsp05-02ordinance 1 I 1 Bud Howell 11821 Mt Vernon Avenue Mr. Howell states that he s lived at this address for many years and is very happy with., the job that,the Planning Co mission has done. Mr. Howell is concerned with the areeW that have red curbs_for no pa ing and feels that it could pose as a problem in the future. Most of the houses within the ea have alleyways with garages. The only parking on the streets are for guests. Should t e City decide to have no street parking in front of these homes, the single family residenc within the area will be greatly affected Planning Director Koontz replied that he decisions of where the curbs are to be painted red are the concern of the Community Se ices Department and the City Council. J , ITEMS: 1. MINUTES Planning Com fission Meeting Minutes of November 3, 20 5 RECOMMENDATION: Approval MOTION PC-45-2006: Vice Chair Addington ade a motion to approve the minutes of November 4, 2005 Vice Chair Addington wanted to add that prior to vote g on the final item, he wanted to note the long pause prior to making his motion. ' Commissioner Comstock S onded the motion MOTION VOTE PC-45-2005: Approved 4-0-0-1 Commissioner Bidney Abstaine 2. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting inutes of November 17, 2005 RECOMMENDATION: Approval MOTION PC46-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to approve the minutes of November 17, 2005 Commissioner Comstock Seconded the m tion MOTION VOTE PC-46-2005: Approved 4-0-0-0 3. SP-05-02, SA-05-19, SA-05-24, TTM-05-03 E-05-21: SP-05-02, SA-05-19, SA-05-24, Vesting Map TTM-05-03, (County No. 17766) and E-05-21 to construct a 35 single unit single family condominium project on 3.7 acres. 2 1 APPLICANT: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vemon Avenue about 750 • southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.) i 'RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive the staff report and testimony,' close the Hearing and approve the Resolution calling for the approval of SA-05-19, SA-05-25 and E-04-21 and recommend to the City Council the approval of the Resolution calling for the approval of Vesting Map TTM-05-03 and the adoption of the Ordinance for SP-05-02. - Associate Planner Lampe greeted the Commission and presented his Staff Report. A proposal has been made to construct a 35 unit single family residential condominium project on a 3.7 acre parcel. The subject site is located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon. The property is located approximately 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Brentwood Street and Mt. Vernon Avenue. The site is presently occupied by a single family home that was built in 1922. Also on the site is a swimming pool and various accessory buildings that were used for agricultural purposes in the past. The house and the out buildings will be removed if this project.is approved. The site contains numerous mature trees and slopes approximately 4 1/2% to the west- The high point of the site is located along Mt.. Vernon with a drop of about 25 feet to the westerly end of the property.-- In addition, there are substantial slopes on the perimeter towards the Highland Apartments which are located to the north of the subject site.. The site is enclosed on the westerly, northerly and southerly' sides by the Highlands Apartments.. The average density of the project is 17 units to the acre. The east side of Mt. Vernon is single family detached housing in the R1 Zone. Mt. Vernon Avenue is an 88 foot wide secondary highway and as shown on the City's Circulation Element. It is presently developed with curbs, gutters and meandering sidewalk on the westerly side in front of the subject site. i The subject site is located in the R3 or the Medium Density Residential Zone, and the "MDR" (Medium Density Residential) category of the City's General Plan. The maximum density allowed in the R3 Zone is 12 units per acre, with a bonus which would allow up to 15 units to the acre. i The proponents could have come before the Commission this evening for an apartment project, with 12 or more units per acre under the existing R3 Zone. However, a condominium type of project has-been proposed with 9 1/2 units to the acre. i The site plans illustrates the proposed project consisting of 35 detached single family residential units located throughout the development all the way to the westerly end of the project. It will be serviced by a 26 wide drive in a loop configuration with one entrance off of Mt. Vernon Avenue. The fire department has required that there will be a separate means of access to the property located Here for emergency purposes or tly. l The units will be set back about 19 feet from the Mt. Vernon right of way to the residential structures. Also, from the westerly and northerly property lines, the setback will- be averaging about nine feet. The units will be setback ten to thirteen feet from the in •tenor loop drive which provides interior access to the property. The units will be sitting approximately ten to thirteen feet back-from the edge of the drive. The distance between units will be eight feet. A zero lot line type of configuration will be provided but the spaces are not lots in the sense of the. Subdivision Map Act. Each buyer will be given the air rights to the actual unit itself and also . to the small yard surrounding each unit. The lot sizes will range from about 2,600 to 2,700 square feet or a little over 4,300 square feet in size. The average space size will be a little less than 3,000 square feet per unit. Some of the units that will be fronting off of the interior drive setback about ten feet from the drive, and some of the driveways providing access to each garage measure about fifteen feet in length. Staff feels that this could pose a problem should one have a full sized car, the vehicle could probably be backed out or at least block the proposed five foot wide sidewalk which will be located on the outside of the interior loop. To avoid this problem, the .Staff is suggesting that the project be modified to some extent that the driveways have at least an eighteen foot minimum depth as measured from the garage to the edge of the loop or the outer edge of the sidewalk. The total onsite parking will consist of.a two car garage per unit with 70 parking spaces located within the complex besides the garages. Also shown are two open .guest parking areas for guests or visitors with a total of 18 open parking spaces. This onsite parking meets more than the minimum requirements for this project. In.addition to that, there will b� additional parking for visitors in front of each garage. There are two common open areas. The larger of the two will be 5,600 square feet and will be located in the westerly center of the project. There is no specific active recreational amenities shown for this area other than a proposed walkway across it. This will- also be the location of an underground detention basin which is part of the drainage system of the project. The Staff has suggested that a condition be added that the developers supply recreational plans to provide more active recreational amenities for the site. The secondary location is at the southeast corner of the subject site which will be developed for additional landscaping for the project. At the present time, there is a five to six foot block along the southerly, westerly, and northerly perimeters of the property separating the site from the Highlands Apartments project. This wall will be removed and replaced by a system of retaining walls and a screening wall which will be six feet in height. Interior fencing between the units will consist of wood fencing approximately five to six feet in height with gates between each unit. Along the Mt. Vernon frontage, the specific plan discusses fencing which will be enhanced with pilasters along Mt. Vernon Avenue. The Staff is asking for a fencing plan to be submitted as part of the approval package for this project. Two floor plans have been proposed for the project. Plan One consists of a first floor kitchen, living room, dining room and powder room. The second floor will have a master* bedroom and two additional Laths and two additional bedrooms. Plan Two consists of a similar floor plan as Plan One, but slightly bigger in terms of square footage for a total of I 1,828 square feet. There is also an option to add a fourth bedroom with a total square footage of 1,963 square feet. The design concept of the project is that each floor plan will have three elevations to vary I the architectural style within the project. Thespecific plan talks about-a theme of early 20th century California Spanish bungalow style with low pitched roofs and barrel shaped roof tiles to accent the character of the buildings. There will also be wrought iron shutters to compliment the Spanish style. The Applicant did provide colored elevations for the three alternatives schemes for each plan and are displayed for the Commission to review. Also submitted with the packet was a preliminary landscaping plan. All of the proposed trees will be 24 to 36 inch box trees. Because this is a condominium project under the State Map Act, the Tentative Tract Mar has to be filed under the County of San Bernardino, Number 17766. As part of the Conditions of Approval is that a homeowners association shall be created which will have.the responsibility of managing and maintaining this development. A conceptual grading plan was also submitted. The average grade from the easterly end of the property and the westerly part of the property will be 5%. Maximum retaining wall i height will be about 10 feet along the southerly boundary of the subject site. In addition, there will be about 25,000 cubic yards of earth that will be exported from the site. The Staff is recommending mitigation of the amount of earth that will be exported from what is essentially a residential site and are suggested that an approved export plan be submitted with the City prior to the issuance of the grading permit to provide regulation an"--, the hours of the grading. ! The storm water drainage system for the project has been reviewed in detail by the City Engineer, and the City Engineer feels that the submitted plans prepared by the applicant's engineer are feasible. i The final part of the specific plan discusses that the project will be developed in phases. Staff has added a condition that phasing for the project be subject to some regulation so that there will be an assurance that the project will be completed in a reasonable amount of time. f As part of the CEQA review, it is Staffs opinion that the project does qualify for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project will not have an adverse affect on the environment. I In making a recommendation, Staff has considered the following items: (1) This is a site that has been zoned for moderate density development for 20 years. (2) The project is consistent with the zoning under the City's General Plan. (3) The development will be an attractive asset to the City; and (4) the project will provide a transitional use between the apartments west of Mt. Vernon and the single family homes on the east side. Based on the analysis, Staff is recommending to the City Council the approval of the p approval of the vesting tentative submitted Specific Plan and the a five tract map together with the mitigated Negative declaration, and that the Commission i also approve the submitted j site and architectural review applications. I V Associate Planner Lampe concluded that the Conditions of Approval. and the Site and Architectural Review, one of the Conditions, Number 17 states that the setbacks along the- northerly, westerly and southerly property lines should be in agreement with what was shown on the site plan with the exception of allowing patio covers--AoFbe built ,on the res yard setbacks. An exception needs to be added to the effect that,thecrear setback can be modified to accommodate the 18 foot driveway length. To increase-1he 'dnveway length, the rear yards would have to be reduced to accommodate the change4 Also, Fescoe Engineering sent a letter to Staff with regard to Condition�25'of the Tract Map which required that the Applicant submit the proposed storm filter.forxthe� project to the Water Quality Control Board for approval. The Applicant's engineer,suggested a revised language for Condition Number 25. The City Engineer was contacted,and:he did not have a problem with the revised language noting the fact that there .is language in that revision that states that the storm filter would remain subject to approval of the'City Engineer. Associate Planner Lampe concluded his Staff Report. Vice Chair Addington asked with regard to the revised Condition Number 25, does the City issue precise grading permits. Public Works Director Shields replied that the City does require precise grading permits. Vice Chair Addington wanted more information about the section along the westerly property line. Associate Planner Lampe 'replied that the Applicant's Engineer has the information wit regard to that section of the project and will be presenting it before the Commission. Chair Wilson opened up the Public Hearing. David McMahon Applicant Greystone Development 341 Bayside#7, Newport Beach Mr. McMahon introduced himself to the Commission and -reported that he has brought his Engineer along with his architect to answer-any questions that the Commission may have. John Olivier Fescoe Engineering 16795 Von Karman, Irvine Mr. Olivier greeted the Commission and reported that the Conditions of Approval were reviewed and they are in agreement with the Conditions. With regard to the west wall at the property line, a diagram has been issued to the Commission with regard to the area showing the details of the storm filter drains and the storm drain system. Vice Chair Addington asked Mr. Olivier does the 8 foot by 4 inch high outlet curb have the capacity for the 17 to 18 CFS as proposed. Mr. Olivier replied that the final engineering is working with the City Staff to confirm those calculations with regard to the outlet curb. 6 Vice Chair Addington asked if there is an emergency overland escape .route should an emergency occur. Mr. Olivier replied that there is. Chair Wilson wanted information with regard to the filtering-agents that will be proposed. a Mr. Olivier replied that per the Water Quality Guidelines that a charcoal filter system will be l utilized. Chair Wilson asked what type of curb will be proposed for the project. I _ Mr. Olivier replied that it will be a wedge curb. Chair Wilson wanted more information with regard to the proposed sidewalks around the entire project. David McMahon Applicant Greystone Development 341 Bayside Drive#7, Newport Beach Mr. McMahon felt that it would be a nice addition to have sidewalks throughout the entire project so that children may be able to ride their bicycles on the sidewalks rather than on the streets. Vice Chair Addington asked with the area along Unit 1, where the east wall facing Mt, Vernon,Avenue, is this a proposed flat wall or a zero lot line wall. Mr. McMahon replied that the architect could answer the question. Albert Yolo Architect 2031 Orchard Drive, Newport Beach f Mr. Yolo replied that the side of the Unit is the active side where the larger windows and the master bedroom would front that side. Chair Wilson asked with regard to the retention basin, what 9 type of drainage will be used. John Olivier Fescoe Engineering i 16795 Von Karman, Irvine i Currently, a park element is planned in the area with 60 inch pipes underneath to take the peak flow off of the main storm drain to divert it. Chair Wilson asked if a Maxwell System was considered. Mr. Olivier replied that it was not considered but can be checked with the soils engineer. Chair Wilson asked if any discussion has been ,made with the fire department. 7 Mr. Olivier met with the fire department with regard to the requirement of the secondary access. Public Works Director Shields asked with regard to the sheet that was passed out by th Applicant's Engineer. In the event a 100 year storm presents itself and there would b water going over the block wall, was there any concern of the water going directly into the garages of the Highland Apartments. Is there any thought about putting in a head wall and directing the flows towards the planter area and exits beyond the residences. Mr. Olivier feels that it can be accommodated to increase the angle of the parkway culvert to get the water flowing in the right direction. At this point, there is no objection to including this in the Conditions. Chair Wilson closed the Public Hearing and brought the item back.to the Commission. Commissioner Bidney asked if there are any amenities proposed for the project. Planning Director Koontz replied that a Condition has been added to include some type of amenity package. Vice Chair Addington asked if on street parking be allowed or permitted within the project. Planning Director Koontz replied that the fire department will not allow on street parking for a street that is at 26 feet. MOTION PC-47-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to add three conditions to the project. The first Condition was to add Item 3 to add th� following Condition to SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 as presented by Associate Planner Lampe. The second Condition is to add the revised wording for Condition 25 as presented by the Applicant. The third Condition is to require architectural features along Unit Number 1 at the easterly portion of the. property as seen from the street. Commissioner Bidney seconded the motion. MOTION VOTE PC-47-2005: Approved 4-0-0-0 MOTION PC-48-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to approve SP-05-02, SA- 05-19, SA-05-24, TTM-05-03 and E-05-21 with the additional conditions that were approved. Commissioner Comstock seconded the motion. MOTION VOTE PC-48-2006: Approved 4-0-0-0 i I ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-02 (SP-05-02) FOR A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION WITH 35 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ON A 3.7 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF MT. VERNON AVE. AT 11830 MT. VERNON AVE. AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-21 (E-05-21) -MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, the applicant has filed the necessary applications including four Site and Architectural Review cases and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to create 35 single family detached condominium units; and WHEREAS, there is no existing zone in the City's Zoning Code to accommodate the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan also requires the filing of a Specific Plan for any i residential project with more than 20 units; and jWHEREAS,Section 18.90.040 of the Zoning Code allows for the adoption of a Specific Plan for those unique properties where the existing zoning provisions are unique or unusual; and WHEREAS,the subject site is an infill site left after the Highlands Apartments developed to the north, west and south; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will represent a transition between the Highlands Apartments on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue and the single family residential on the easterly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue; and i WHEREAS,the resulting density of this project at 9.5 units per acre is not inconsistent with existing development in the area including the large apartment complex,the Highlands Apartments, immediately to the north,west and south; and i WHEREAS, Specific Plan No. 05-02;Exhibit A, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS,in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an environmental review for Specific Plan No. 05-02 has been conducted and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared under E-05-21 for this project with the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) having been considered by both the Planning Commission and the City Council; and I WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held properly noticed public hearing on this project on December 15, 2005; and i i WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following the conclusion of the public hearing on December 15, 2005 recommended that the City Council approve Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration under Environmental Review No. 05-21, set out in the attached Exhibits A and B,by adopting this Ordinance; and - WHEREAS, the Planning Commission in taking the above action found that the proposed Specific Plan No. 05-02 will not be: 1. Detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the city; or 2. Injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. WHEREAS,the City Council held a properly notice public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and other relevant testimony on October 13,2005 and on November 10, 2005 for SP-05-02 and E-05-21. NOW, THEREFOR, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Specific Plan No. 05-02 to allow for the development of 35 single family detached condominiums,set out in full in Exhibit A,is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace. Section 2. The Mitigated Negative.Declaration on file in the offices of the Community Development Department under E-05-21 is hereby approved as Exhibit B. Section 3. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 3 1"day of its adoption. Section 4 Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within fifteen(15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26t"day of January,2006 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 9t' day of February, 2006. I ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace I Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the January 26, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: I NOES: ABSENT: I ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Approved as to form: John Harper City Attorney c:\MyFilesVOHN\Greystone\sp05-02ordinance I I I I i I I I RESOLUTION NO. 05_ RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 05-03 (TTM 17766)FOR A 35 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, the applicant, The Greystone Group Inc. and Sequoia Equities, has applied for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(TTM 17766)to create a 35 unit condominium subdivision on a 3.7 acre parcel in the City of Grand Terrace; and, WHEREAS,the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03 (County No. 17766)was deemed complete on December 8,2005; and WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 15,2005; and WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),Article 6,Section 15070,the proposed project for 35 condominium units qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-21; and WHEREAS, the.Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM 17766)to the City Council at its meeting of December 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on January 26, 2006 regarding the approval of Tentative Tract Map-05-03 (TTM 17766). NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements is consistent with the General Plan in that the overall density and lot size conform to the General Plan and that all required improvements will be provided; and 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development in that the site is fairly level, is served by adequate public services and utilities and the project conforms to the provisions of the existing zoning; and 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that this is an urban infill project with no wildlife habitats on the site; and I� I l 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that all necessary public utilities and services will be provided; and 5. The proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of the City's Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law in that the proposed development conforms to the Medium Density Residential Category of the General Plan and the Zoning as established by Specific Plan No. 05-02. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TMM 17766) is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: General Conditions of Approval: 1. Details shown on the tentative tract map are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of ordinance,general conditions of approval,or City policies must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals 2. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. As a vesting map,this request was deemed complete on December 8,2005. Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval: 4. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant must agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Conditions"form. The content of the form to be prepared by the Community Development Department. 5. Provide a"will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company. 6. Monumentation of tract map boundaries, street centerline and lot boundaries is required 7. A final tract map prepared by,or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor,must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract map is released for filing with the County Recorder. 9. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map. 10. Submit a preliminary soils/geotechnical report prepared by a California registered civil engineer. i 11. Prior to final map approval,a grading plan shall be prepared by a civil engineer based on the recommendations of soils/geotechnical report. 12. Prior to the final map approval,the developer shall submit sewer plans to the City for review and approval. All residential units within the proposed condominium subdivision shall be served by the public sewer system. 13. Prior to final map approval, a drainage study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in accordance with the standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design Manual to the satisfaction of the City. The Drainage Study shall include,but not be limited to,the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream storm drain. The study shall include the design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the satisfaction of the City. 14. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall demonstrate that all legal rights to drain storm water onto the down stream properties to a sufficient outlet exist or the Developer shall obtain those rights prior to the final map approval. 15. Prior to final map approval,the downstream sewer system shall be analyzed to insure there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development. The study shall include.the design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the sewer system. 16. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall obtain sewer easements for the construction of all required downstream sewer improvements on private property and rights to utilize the sewer capacity of privately owned downstream sewer mains. t 17. Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer to design the facilities required by the drainage and sewer studies 18. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall construct any, and all missing public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue in accordance with City requirements. 19. Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer for any work in the public right-of-way and shall be approved by the City; and the appropriate encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City prior to commencing any such work. 20. Prior to final map approval,all on-site and off-site curbs,gutters,paving,street lights,sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation. 21. Prior to final map approval,plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the subdivider has entered into a contract a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment and installation of the water improvements. 22. Prior to the final map approval,there shall also be filed with the City Engineer,a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire Chiefs fire flow requirements. i 23. The project shall be used only for residential uses. Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions (C,C&R's) shall be recorded as part of this tract. As a minimum, these C, C&R's shall include the provisions for the establishment of a"Homeowner's Association." The C,C& R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and City Attorney for review and approval prior to recordation. 24. The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(C,C&R's)applicable to the project property JI shall be consistent with the terms of this map and all City Codes. If there is a conflict between the CC&R's and any City Code or this map,the City Codes or this map shall prevail. 25. The Stormwater 360 precast stormfilter shall be designed and submitted to the Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) for approvals. The Home Owners Association CC&R's shall contain instructions for the care,maintenance,and testing of the water quality facility,including,but not limited to any restrictions to landscaping fertilizers, nitrogen and/or pathogens. Conditions After the Final Map Approval: 26. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and one(1)Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. I PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,California at a regular meeting held on the 26'h day of January,2006. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof of the City Council thereof Approved as to form: City Attorney John Harper C•\MyFi l esUGHN\Greystone\TTM-05-03resoluti on I STAFF REPORT' CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CRA ITEM() COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: January 26,2006 SUBJECT: APPOINT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO BI-COUNTY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TO SAN �. BERNARDINO COUNTY CORRIDOR FUNDING REQUIRED: YES Q NO (X) SANBAG and RCTC created the Bi-County Policy Advisory Committee for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor,to study the possible alternate routes to move traffic north and south between the respective Counties. That committee which has not met for over a year and a half is now being re-activated to discuss potential alternatives for transportation corridors that will affect the City of Grand Terrace. Two possible scenarios affecting Grand Terrace would be alignments that would include Pigeon Pass and Reche Canyon Road. Council Member Herman Hilkey is currently appointed to this committee,however,his current work commitments prohibit him from attending daytime meetings. The next meeting scheduled is February 3rd at 1lam at the RCTC offices. Staff is requesting that Council appoint a member of the City Council to the Bi-County Policy Advisory Committee for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor. RECOMMENDATION: STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL APPOINT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO REPRESENT THE' CITY ON THE BI-COUNTY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE MORENO-VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY -CORRIDOR. � m SANBAG ,I AGENDA BI-COUNTY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE i FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CORRIDOR Friday- February 3, 2006 11:00 a.m. - 1:00p.m. (LUNCH WILL BE PROVIDED) i City of Moreno Valley Training Room, 2nd Floor 14177 Frederick Street Moreno Valley 1. Introductions 2. Review of Work to Date on the Corridor -Cathy Bechtel(RCTC) and Ty Schuiling (SANBAG) will provide an overview of the project and work completed to date 3. Reche Canyon Road Widening Project -LAN Engineering will provide an overview of the current project and current local issues surrounding the project 4. Next Steps -Staff is seeking policy direction on how to proceed i 5. Adjournment i i C1T r . RAND TERR C Community Services Department Staff Report MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) PROGRAM YEAR 2005-2006 RE-ALLOCATION FUNDING AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: The City of Grand Terrace is under contract with County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development(ECD)who is responsible for the review and compliance of programs conducted within Grand Terrace. This includes not only the conducting of the grant process, but also the administration of project implementation and compliance. The County has a process which follows the guidelines of HUD in requiring public hearings and input into the grant allocation process for these funds. For Grand Terrace, this includes a public hearing, submittal of recommended projects to ECD who qualifies for the eligible programs, then returns those to the City for prioritization and funding. Additionally, during the grant process, outside agencies may submit projects directly to the County, however, the final determination of the spending of the City allocation is with the purview of the City Council. To date, the City has: • $95,845 allocated for the Petta Park project • $170,911 in un-allocated funds to be used in approved Target Areas • $150,000 for remediation at the K&J Plating site The City is also expecting approximately$57,000 for the 2006-07 FY. DISCUSSION The City has a very limited scope when using CDBG funds. The Senior Center, ADA ramps/access, and audible PEDS have been the only projects that have gained approval by the County for the use of the funds. With the pending.development of the new Senior Center and Petta Park, the funds allocated to the park development can be better utilized in the Target Area. The City has one Target Area that CDBG funds can be used for street improvements, curbs, gutters, etc. Attached is a map of the Target Area. Staff is requesting council to re-allocate Petta Park project funds ($95,845) and up to$150,000 in un- allocated funds to be used for a Street Improvement Project in the Target Zone. Staff will be working with our Traffic Engineer, Street Contractor, and maintenance staff on identifying areas that could benefit with these improvements. CDBG requires a public bidding process on all projects. RECOMMENDATION: i k Authorize staff to re-submit an updated Funding List to the County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development. This updated list will include a request to re-allocate our programmed funds (Petta Park Project- $95,845) and un-programmed funding(up to $150,000) for a total of up to$245,845. . I I i I� I For more information Visit Cit o f Grand Tee ac a ,W.cityofgrancYter www.cityofgrandten,ace.org t.�yrg Y Street Sweeping Schedule _ .�� (ALIF0AN11" 2OOE) ' ___.,.•. 1 RANDE 40� ` GRAND GI 1 �N s RRE ST ■ irrro.W EATON DR 1 4p Ra z N RIA DR r1 4 �F rr�rrrrr� U A4 - 7t, O A y -nQQw 3e F �\,5 � 1 N' ( r4� rr C fI,, O Vp�!: t •�C AIRHAR[AV �� CMCq NAIC D A •Y" •.�'Qi Uu ICACO_CR ''^Mfi '', �• • GS 1 I :. �i. CENTER& 'Cf� • �Q•' J p aW { � / U LI i 1I s4' BRARFY Z1 ��: tl u LM�AV I - �-.U - - RM R& �eMt�TloN Cr tl Cr JENSEN Cr Ll QQ RANGEWOOD U �gj Z SD70 ttnp! DESOTO ST r° Cr \ LDE BERRY ST p� p"i < O R BERR FULMAR > WREN ST 1 < RICHAAD v- i ! > MAVISS7 < ZO ROLLIIS r lWCH Si 4 < !INCH Sr tl CAR PINAL CA Sr I�+++ �7' t AIL ST f� CARDIfUL it y [' BLUKBIRD7,7. u 215 VAN R REN T THRUSH ST > ST EEMIFIELD IDZ >c Zone NTF�ID Sr0 ST q oG k k. - JLARK e 1 1. First Monday ' g L RAIM LAWS` �"°` S` e � � EMERAID BT� q 2. First Wednesday oc ju DOW . 3. "First Thursday V Fl " - MAMMIN 8 Sr "`° Sr 4. Second Monday lICO Sr It �+ � > < tT lICO RIAKINGO Wednesday o < A� < TANAGER N 1 'GNAGER ST 5. Second VYednesday 5TANAGER ST`�' � G RAVEN >WAy 6. Second Thursday i �� ~M4 0 RAVEN WAY LSE CCC �� EE aoBBV o WAY r. ...,�...�.., .�.. .� ''1D�`s' a o All streets in the city will be swel,t Ofice MAIN ST MAIN Sr - MAtN ST rrr• per month base on the above schedule fron'6:00 am to 3:00 pm-PLEASE 1\40V I ALL VEHICLES FROM THE STREET NOTE CHANGES TO ZONE 1 &/i