02/10/2009 P
GRAND TERR CE February'10;2009
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
California 92313-5295
Civic Center
(909)8246621
Fax(909)783-7629
'Fax(909)783=2600 CITY OF GRAND , TERRACE -
Maryetta.Ferr6
Mayor
CRA/CITY COUNCIL
Lee Ann Garcia
Mayor Pro Tern REGULAR.MEETINGS , -
Bea Cortes
Jim Miller 2 D AND- 4TH •Tuesday' - 6 00 p:m:
Walt Stanckiewitz
Council Members
Ste've'Berry
Acting City-Manager +
-Council Chambers
Grand'Ter.race Civic Center
227,95 Barton Road'
Grand Terrace,, CA 92313=5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS February 10,2009
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 p.m.
22795 Barton Road
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. IF YOU
REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING,PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT
(909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING,PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO
SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED
UPON BY THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
ANY DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO A MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA
WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT CITY HALL LOCATED AT
22795 BARTON ROAD DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. IN ADDITION,SUCH DOCUMENTS WILL BE POSTED ON
THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT WWW.CITYOFGRANDTERRACE.ORG
* Call to Order-
* Invocation-
* Pledge of Allegiance-
* Roll Call-
STAFF COUNCIL
t- AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Approval of 01-27-2009 Minutes Approve
2. Approval of an Agency-Funded Commercial Improvement Approve
Program to Encourage Exterior Improvements to Existing
Commercial Properties
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Orval Walden-Citizen Patrol
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen
may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
A. Approve Check Register Dated February 10,2009 Approve
B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
C. Approval of 01-27-2009 and 02-03-2009 Minutes Approve
COUNCIL AGENDA
02-10-2009 PAGE 2 OF 2
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
D. Completion of the City Hall Fire Detection Installation Approve
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any
items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions
contained in California Law,the City Council may not discuss or act
on any item not on the agenda,but may briefly respond to statements
made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also
request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public
comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting
5. REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
1. Emergency Operations Committee
a. Minutes of January 6,2009 Accept
B. Council Reports
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue,
and northwest corner of Britton Way and Mount Vernon
Avenue(Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0275-251-14,21,27,30,
31,32, 55,73 and 74)
Adopt a Resolution to Vacate Ordering the Vacation of a Adopt
Portion of Public Street Known as Britton Way
Adopt a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 08-02 Adopt
(TPM No. 19131)and Environmental 08-03
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Approve
Amending Chapter 15.09.20 California Existing Building
Code, Title 15 Chapters 15.09.20 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code Relating to Repairs of Damaged Structures
8. NEW BUSINESS-None
9. CLOSED SESSION-None
ADJOURN
THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD
ON TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 24,2009 AT 6:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN
WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NO LATER THAN
14 CALENDAR DAYS PRECEDING THE MEETING
PENDING CRA APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING -JANUARY 27, 2009
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in
the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,
_ on January 27, 2009 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Chairman
Lee Ann Garcia,Vice-Chairman
Bea Cortes, Agency Member
Jim Miller, Agency Member
Walt Stanckiewitz, Agency Member
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Acting City Manager
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
Joyce Powers, Community& Economic Development Director
Richard Shields, Building & Safety Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Lt. Mike Newcombe, Sheriff's Department
ABSENT: Tom Schwab, City Manager
John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 6:00 P.M.
APPROVAL OF 01-13-2009 MINUTES
CRA-2009-06 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN
GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the January 13, 2009 Community
Redevelopment Agency Minutes.
APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACQUISITION OF A VACANT PARCEL IN THE
22100-22200 BLOCK OF BARTON ROAD
CRA-2009-07 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
CORTES,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the
Community Redevelopment Agency and Commercial Pacific Holding, Inc. For the
Acquisition of APN 0275-242-11 and the Budget Appropriation in the amount of
$215,000 to Complete the Project.
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE EXISTING STORMWATER DRAINAGE
FACILITY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN COLTON
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. I
Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes
January 27,2009
Page 2
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND A
PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATION
CRA-2009-08 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 5-0, to approve a Resolution of the Community
Redevelopment Agency Adopting Certain Findings Regarding the Construction and
Installation of Public Improvements, which are of Benefit to the Grand Terrace
Community Redevelopment Project Area and appropriate $130,000 from the
Redevelopment Undesignated Fund Balance to Fund the Project as proposed..
Chairman Ferr6 adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:10 p.m.,until the
next CRA/City Council Meeting that is scheduled to be held on Tuesday,February 10,2009 at 6:00
p.m.
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM (X ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: February 10 , 2009
FUNDING REQUIRED: ( X ) NO FUNDING REQUIRED ( )
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGENCY-FUNDED COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO
EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommended Commercial Improvement
Program and Agency budget appropriation of$100,000 to
fund the Program
BACKGROUND:
Programs to fund exterior commercial building improvements are typical of
redevelopment agencies throughout the State due to the public benefit derived from the
visual enhancement to commercial corridors. Used in combination with streetscape and
traffic improvements, the programs encourage a stronger business environment that is
more attractive to the community as a whole.
Within our commercial districts, deteriorating conditions have increasingly become
evident at some centers and individual storefronts. To continually improve upon our
successful community, staff is recommending implementation of a Commercial
Improvement Program and has developed program guidelines for the Agency Board's
review. To meet public benefit thresholds for use of Agency funds, staff recommends
that eligible exterior improvements include, but are not limited to:
■ Exterior enhancements to the building, such as paint, stucco, awnings, trellises,
stone or brickwork
■ Window and door replacement
• Landscaping improvements
■ New signs and correction of any sign violations
■ Exterior lighting
• Parking lot improvements
• ADA improvements
■ Seismic retrofitting and fire prevention systems that without would prevent
occupancy of a commercial building
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.2-
1
Tenant and interior improvements are not eligible, nor are improvements that would not
be part of the buildings or grounds if a business vacates.
Both business and property owners may apply for program funding, and tenants will be
required to obtain approval from the property owner. To encourage participation, staff
recommends grants of up to 90% of the project costs, setting a cap of $35,000 for a
single storefront. For larger multi-tenant projects, funding would be recommended
based on cost effectiveness of the requested improvements, orientation of the property
to the main commercial corridors, available Agency funding, and financial participation
by the applicant. Payment of State prevailing wages would be required for all project
contractors receiving Agency funding.
The proposed program also includes an additional $5,000 rebate for conceptual design
by an architect. For minor projects, such as paint and awnings, architectural renderings
may not be necessary. The applicant may either select their own architect or the
Agency may contract with architectural firms to provide these services after issuance of
a Request for Proposals. The latter process usually encourages more program
participation and is what staff recommends upon approval of the program.
Program Operating Procedures for the staff have been completed and are attached
(Exhibit 1). The procedures also include program exclusions and steps for project
implementation. A streamlined program application form (Exhibit 2) and a procedural
checklist for applicants (Exhibit 3) have also been prepared to simplify the process for
participants. Community and Economic Development staff will guide applicants step-
by-step through the entire process to prevent cancellation of projects.
F
The property owners would be required to sign a Maintenance and Security Agreement
(Exhibit 4) requiring high maintenance standards and cooperation with law enforcement
officers. The Agreement is a recorded covenant and stays with the land.
It is not yet known how many projects will be funded this fiscal year, but there is early
interest from one of the larger center owners. If the Program is well received, additional
funding will be requested for fiscal year 2009-10.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are sufficient funds in the RDA undesignated available fund balance to fund the
Commercial Improvement Program as proposed.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Approve the proposed Commercial Improvement Program.
2. Approve a FY 2008-09 budget appropriation of $100,000 from the RDA
undesignated available fund balance for project funding.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Commercial Improvement Program Operating Procedures (in-house)
Exhibit 2: Program Application
Exhibit 3: Applicant Procedural Checklist
Exhibjt,4• �r a to ce and Security Agreement
i
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Operating Procedures
Program Overview
The Redevelopment Agency (Agency) offers the Commercial Improvement
Program (Program) to property owners and business owners as an economic
incentive to rehabilitate existing commercial structures. Implementation of the
Program is expected to eliminate blight, yield a stronger commercial presence,
and increase the likelihood of new business development.
The Program focuses on the exterior improvement of commercial buildings,
including new paint/stucco, new doors and windows, decorative awnings,
signage, landscaping and lighting. The Program is not intended as a mechanism
for the finance of new construction or general maintenance tasks such as re-
roofing, unless such work is minor in nature and is incorporated within a specific
improvement design. In addition, owners of structures in poor condition that are
not likely candidates may request funding for the demolition of structures that
contribute a blighting influence to a Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area).
For a full discussion of eligible property improvements, please see "General
Provisions— Eligible Improvements and Program Exclusions."
The Program offers financial assistance to interested property owners and/or
business owners in the form of grants and/or rebates to cover 90% of the costs
related to the design and construction of exterior improvements. For a full -
description of the type of financing available to Program participants, including an
initial grant from the Agency to pay for architectural design, please see the
Financing Terms and Conditions on page 5.
Participation in the Program will require property maintenance covenants to be
recorded against title to the property. Such maintenance covenants will stipulate
that the property in question shall be maintained in clean and attractive condition
for the life of the Redevelopment Plan.
Program exceptions are at the discretion of the Community and Economic
Development Director and may be appealed to the Agency Board.
1
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
General Provisions
I. Eligibility Requirements
A. Applicant Eligibility Requirements - Participation in the Program will
be based upon the following applicant eligibility requirements:
1. Applicant must be either a) the legal owner of a commercial
property located within a Project Area or b) an owner of a
business located within the Project Area with a current City
business license.
2. If the applicant is a business owner, he or she must provide
the Agency with a) a copy of the current Lease Agreement
and b) the signature of the property owner on the
application.
B. Property Eligibility Requirements— Participation in the Program will
be based upon the following property requirements:
1. The property must be located within a Project Area.
2. The property must be commerically zoned and used for
- commercial purposes.
II. Eligible Improvements and Program Exclusions
A. Eligible Improvements — Program funding may be utilized to cover
project costs associated with the following work items:
1. Repair or replacement of damaged or deteriorated fagade
components;
2. New exterior treatments or wall finishes;
3. New painting (color is subject to review and approval;
4. Signage subject to approval by the Planning Department
(including the removal of existing, nonconforming signs and
the installation of new signs);
5. Installation of new doors, windows, awnings and canopies;
6. Decorative masonry walls;
7. Exterior lighting;
8. Landscaping, including landscaping meant to screen on-site
parking areas from view;
9. Demolition of unoccupied and nonconforming structures or
building elements that contribute a blighting influence to the
Project Area;
2
5
10. Installation of fire prevention systems required for the
rehabilitation and occupancy of historic buildings;
11. Improvements necessary to make the property compliant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act; and
12. Seismic retrofitting.
B. Program Exclusions — Program funding may not be used to cover
costs associated with the following:
1. Installation of security bars;
2. Construction of new space or building expansion;
3. Improvements to extend the life of nonconforming uses;
4. Uses inconsistent with Redevelopment Plans, the City of
Riverside General Plan, and other applicable Specific Plans
and design guidelines;
5. Improvements that do not comply with the Building,
Electrical, Mechanical, Fire, and Plumbing Codes; and
6. Interior tenant improvements.
III. Project Application Process and Implementation
A. Application Submittal
1. Prior to formal submittal, applicants are encouraged to meet
with Agency staff to receive individual guidance.
2. The applicant will complete the Program application and
submit it to the Agency.
3. Agency staff will review the application for completeness and
ensure the proposed project fulfills applicant and property
eligibility requirements.
A. Project Review and Approval
1. Agency staff will meet the applicant on site to take photos
and conduct a preliminary inspection. The purpose of the
property inspection is to ascertain deficiencies and
improvements both required and desired in accordance with
the Program Guidelines. If deemed necessary, Agency staff
will coordinate with the Building Department and request a
more detailed inspection of the property.
2. The applicant will either select an architect to prepare a
design of the proposed improvements or use an architect
under contract with the Agency. The applicant will provide
Agency staff with a copy of the proposed design, including a
detailed construction estimate, for review. All improvements
must be determined to fit within the project budget.
3
6
3. The applicant and staff will review the design and apply for
the appropriate approvals. Each proposed project must
correct exterior code violations and provide signage that
conforms to the City's Zoning Ordinance.
4. If required, staff will assist the applicant in submitting the
project to the Building Department and obtaining approval.
5. Staff will prepare a recommendation on each proposal and
present it to the CED Director. The Director's decision may
be appealed to the Agency Board. An Agency Board
J decision to approve or deny a project is final. If declined, the
applicant shall be notified in writing within 10 days of the
disapproval.
6. The applicant must sign the Property Maintenance
Agreement for recording by the Agency.
B. Project Implementation
1. The applicant shall obtain three prevailing wage proposals for
the work.
2. The participant will be responsible for the selection of a
licensed, insured contractor (subject to approval by Agency
staff) to initiate and complete all construction. The Agency shall
not be a party to the construction contract, but shall ensure
prevailing wages are included and paid.
3. Agency staff shall ensure all financing to complete the project is
in order before work commences.
4. Agency staff may visit the property during the period of
construction to review progress and offer assistance as needed.
5. Upon the completion of construction, the participant shall pay
invoices from the contractor, final any permits, and provide the
Agency with a written request for a rebate of construction costs
up to the amount approved by the Director.
6. Agency staff will issue a Certificate of Completion to accompany
the rebate at project completion.
V. Financing Terms and Conditions
A. An initial grant of up to $5,000 per applicant is available to cover
costs associated with preliminary architectural design. The participant
may contribute additional funds to supplement the initial grant.
B. The participant may request a 90% rebate from the Agency to cover
the costs of project construction for eligible improvements up to
$35,000 maximum per storefront. For larger projects, the Agency
maximum will be determined by the eligible improvements, project
4
size, project location in relation to major commercial corridors, and
applicant's contribution.
1. Prior to requesting the rebate from the Agency, the
participant is responsible for funding all construction costs.
2. The participant bears the sole responsibility for maintaining a
concise record of all construction costs and must submit
receipts for construction costs to the Agency to receive the
rebate.
3. Receipts must be submitted to the Agency within 30 t
calendar days of project completion. Agency staff will
complete its review and processing of rebate requests within
30 calendar days of submittal.
Note: Regarding ADA improvements required, projects under $119,000 may
apply for reduced ADA requirements by completing a hardship request available
at Building and Safety. Approved applicants will be required to only make ADA
improvements equal to 20% of the total project costs.
5
Exhibit 2
Program Application
9
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Commercial Improvement Program
Application Form
1. Applicant Information
First Name: Last Name: Middle Initial:
Mailing Address: City: Zip Code:
Day Phone#: Evening Phone#: Fax#:
2. Property Owner Information (if different than Applicant)
First Name: Last Name: Middle Initial:
Mailing Address: City: Zip Code:
Day Telephone#: Evening Telephone#: Cell Phone#:
3. Property Information
Address: Type of Business: Business License#:
Is the property owned or lease? Lease Expiration Date: _
(Attach copy of lease)
4. Proiect Site Information
Type of building construction (brick, stucco,etc.):
Floor area(approximate square feet): Storefront size(approximate linear feet):
5. Type of Property Improvements (Give a brief description of work to be completed):
I have reviewed the Commercial Improvement Program General Provisions and do hereby agree to comply
with them to be eligible for program participation. All information provided herein is correct and
complete to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant Signature: Date:
Property Owner Signature: Date:
1f
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
APPLICANT PROCEDURAL CHECKLIST
1. Applicant submits an application to Agency staff for consideration.
2. Agency staff reviews the application and meets with Applicant to confirm
eligibility and discuss the project.
3. Applicant selects architect. Applicant and Agency staff meet with the
Architect on site to discuss the project parameters and Applicant's budget.
4. Architect prepares proposal and provides copies to Applicant and Agency
staff. Proposal should contain a description of work to be done, schedule of
completion, and fee.
5. Agency staff and Applicant review Architect's proposal. If both agree proposal
is satisfactory, Agency staff and Applicants sign proposal and Agency staff
returns it to the Architect.
6. Architect prepares Preliminary Design and submits for review.
- Design should provide enough detail for building contractors to bid the
work.
- Design should be accompanied by preliminary construction cost estimate.
7. Applicant provides Agency staff with evidence of ability to finance
construction, and confirms understanding of the prevailing wage requirement.
S. Agency staff and Applicant approve Preliminary Design. Agency staff notifies
Architect to begin preparation of construction drawings.
9. Architect completes preparation of final design and submits to Applicant
(copy to Agency staff). The Applicant is responsible for securing all
necessary permits related to construction. In addition, Architect shall provide
a revised construction cost estimate to aid Applicant during bidding.
10. Applicant bids construction.
- Applicant required to secure bids from at least three experienced,
licensed contractors.
- Applicant must provide copy of each bid to Agency staff (Agency staff will
review each and provide advice, but'is not responsible for selecting
contractor).
- Each bid must reflect the requirement to pay prevailing wage.
11. After the selected contractor's bid is confirmed, Agency staff requests project
funding approval by the Agency Board.
12. The Applicant signs the CIP Property Maintenance Agreement.
1d
13. Applicant notifies contractor in writing to commence work in accordance with
submitted bid. (Copy to Agency staff.)
14. Contractor applies for and receives all relevant permits for construction from
the City's Building Department.
15. Contractor begins construction.
16. Applicant provides weekly updates on construction (verbally) to Agency staff;
Agency staff provides support to Applicant, Contractor as needed.
17. Contractor completes construction; Applicant pays Contractor.
18. Applicant provides Agency staff with complete record of project costs within
30 days of project completion, including copies of cancelled checks, paid
invoices and lien releases. As part of request for rebate and certificate of
completion, Applicant must certify that prevailing wage has been paid for
construction.
19. After review of project documents, Agency staff:
- Confirms with City's Planning/Building Department that all construction
requirements have been met and permits have been finalized.
- Processes payment of rebate within 15 days from receipt.
1�
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED
RETURN TO: '-
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF GRANDT TERRACE
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295
Attention: City Clerk
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
The undersigned (the "Participant") proposes to
undertake certain building exterior renovation and/or improvement work on commercial
property located at , Grand Terrace, CA, located within the
Community Redevelopment Project Area in the City of Grand Terrace (the "Property").
The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (the
"Agency"), has agreed to reimburse Participant for a portion of the cost of the above said
work pursuant to the Agency's Commercial Improvement Program. The sum of
reimbursements made by the Agency to the Participant for such work on the Property is
referred to in this agreement as the "Rebate".
This Property Maintenance and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") is
conditional upon Participant's receiving a Rebate from the Agency. By executing this
Agreement and accepting the Rebate from the Agency, Participant promises to maintain
the Property in good and attractive condition and to comply with all laws for the term of
this agreement, as specified below:
1. The appearance of the building exterior shall not be allowed to deteriorate
due to such reasons as peeling paint, ;
2. Landscaping will be maintained and kept in an attractive condition;
3. The Property shall be maintained in compliance with applicable building
and zoning regulations of the City of Grand Terrace; and,
4. The Participant shall ensure all occupants on the property comply with all
laws, and shall cooperate with any enforcement officer to maintain a
crime free environment.
In the event Participant fails to comply with the aforementioned conditions, and
further fails to correct such deficiency within 60 days after receiving written notice from
the Agency to do so, Participant agrees to repay the Agency the amount of the Rebate,
and Participant shall be liable to the Agency for such amount.
This Agreement shall be for a term which commences on the date the work that
is the subject of the Rebate is completed and terminates at the cessation of authority of
the Redevelopment Plan.
PARTICIPANT:
Signature Date
15
r
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62956 1/22/2009 010452 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 0276-202-54 Escrow Deposit-22747 Barton Road
32-600-301-000-000 10,000.00
Total : 10,000.00
62957 1/22/2009 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PRendl226200f Contributions for PRend 12-26-08
10-022-62-00 20,715 32
Total : 20,715.32
62958 1/28/2009 001206 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION DEC-JAN 2009 Dec-Jan City Visa Use Charges
10-110-120-000-000 448.0,0
10-110-220-000-000 102.37
10-110-270-000-000 129.20
10-180-218-000-000 156.23
10-180-268-000-000 425.48
10-180-270-000-000 48.90
10-180-272-000-000 134.38
10-190-220-000-000 530.33
10-410-701-000-000 286.31
10-440-220-000-000 20.00
10-440-225-000-000 62.58
10-450-246-000-000 26.81
Total : 2,370.59
62959 1/29/2009 010992 COMPUTEK INTERNATIONAL 01292009 Emp Personal Comp Purchase Plan
10-022-56-00 1,232.66
Total : 1,232.66
62960 2/10/2009 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW JANUARY January Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
62961 2/10/2009 010994 ALANIZ, JAMES TAG# 1735 Penalty overpayment refund
10-200-15 15.00
Total : 15.00
62962 2/10/2009 007803 ARAMARK 12059627 MAINT. UNIFORMS
10-180-218-000-000 117.65
Page. 1
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.,_J19
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62962 2/10/2009 007803 ARAMARK (Continued) Total : 117.65
62963 2/10/2009 010678 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 0077587 FY 08/09 BACKUP TAPE STORAGE
10-180-250-000-000 53.72
10-140-250-000-000 53.71
Total : 107.43
62964 2/10/2009 001213 AT&T 9098247013793 Child Care dsl svc
10-440-245-000-000 76.94
Total : 76.94
62965 2/10/2009 010928 C P CONSTRUCTION CO INC. 14203 RAISE 5 SEWER MANHOLES-VIVIENDA
21-573-250-000-000 1,65000
Total : 1,650.00
62966 2/10/2009 001694 CA HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, COMN RO#-09 Childcare Licensing Fees
10-440-228-000-000 2,400.00
Total : 2,400.00
62967 2/10/2009 001713 CA. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 183554 1-215 On/Off Ramp Maintenance
16-510-238-000-000 3524
Total : 35.24
62968 2/10/2009 001498 CALBO 01262009 Class I Membership-R. Shields
10-172-270-000-000 215.00
Total : 215.00
62969 2/10/2009 010726 CHAMBERS GROUP INC. 23534 EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
10-370-250-000-000 2,224.80
23535 EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
10-370-250-000-000 10,279.40
23536 EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
10-370-250-000-000 12,112.57
Total : 24,616.77
62970 2/10/2009 010914 CHASE PHOTOGRAPHY 230 Council Meeting Event Photography
10-190-220-000-000 125.00
Page: 2
J
vchlist Vo,,�v�;her List Page: 3
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62970 2/10/2009 010914 CHASE PHOTOGRAPHY (Continued) Total : 125.00
62971 2/10/2009 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 16212706 Maintenance Vehicle Fuel
10-180-272-000-000 211 86
Total : 211.86
62972 2/10/2009 001840 CITY OF COLTON 000882 ANIMAL CONTROL CODE ENF SRVS
10-190-256-000-000 3,629.00
00880 Wastewater Lab Testinq
21-570-802-000-000 600.00
Total : 4,229.00
62973 2/10/2009 010702 CITY OF YUCAIPA 2117 November Perchlorate Litigation fees
10-160-250-000-000 164.13
Total : 164.13
62974 2/10/2009 010866 CIVIC PLUS 64157 WEBSITE MAINT FEE
10-125-250-000-000 615.00
Total : 615.00
62975 2/10/2009 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 159867 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 606.81
Total : 606.81
62976 2/10/2009 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM DECEMBER December Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 5000
JANUARY January Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 100.00
62977 2/10/2009 001907 COSTCO#478 2213 C CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 89.72
10-440-220-000-000 29.91
Total : 119.63
62978 2/10/2009 010506 COURTSHIP STORIES 94 Blue Mtn Outlook Article Contrib.
10-180-255-000-000 175.00
Page. 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62978 2/10/2009 010506 COURTSHIP STORIES (Continued) Total : 175.00
62979 2/10/2009 010745 D & E ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 404 City Hall P-lot light repair
10-180-246-000-000 1,217.12
Total : 1,217.12
62980 2/10/2009 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B1494028 FY 2008/09 LEGAL ADVERTISING
10-125-230-000-000 5544
B1494048 FY 2008/09 LEGAL ADVERTISING
10-125-230-000-000 110.88
Total : 166.32
62981 2/10/2009 001942 DATA TICKET INC 26223 FY 08/09 PARKING CITE PROCESSING
10-140-255-000-000 350.00
Total : 350.00
62982 2/10/2009 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 014992/104432,' MAINT SUPPLIES
10-180-218-000-000 19.11
015381/0082951 MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 10.77
029939/602005E MAINT SUPPLIES
- 10-180-218-000-000 87.58
Total : 117.46
62983 2/10/2009 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 1026 Rental Inspection fee overpayment
10-400-08 106.75
7416 WEED CONTROL AT PARKS
10-450-245-000-000 500.00
Total : 606.75
62984 2/10/2009 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 90234947 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 13.36
90235301 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-00'0-000 1.49
90238778 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 31.80
Page: 4
vchlist V�_uCher List Page: 5
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62984 2/10/2009 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY (Continued)
90238792 wrong item received-returned
10-450-246-000-000 -6.84
90238794 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 7.16
90238961 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-245-000-000 47.41
90241970 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 43.56
90243568 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 27.35
90243827 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 16.05
90244071 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000=000 8 92
90244358 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 3692
90244376 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 13.96
90244449 wrong item received
10-450-246-000-000 -13.96
90244456 MAINT SUPPLIES & REPAIRS
10-450-246-000-000 13.20
Total : 240.38
62985 2/10/2009 002901 G T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5418-AD JOINT NEWSLETTER CONTRIBUTION
10-125-213-000-000 870.00
5419-AD GT Sweep Maps in BMO
16-900-254-000-000 36.7.50
Total : 1,237.50
62986 2/10/2009 010430 GAIL MATERIALS 52956 Gravel-Park Walking Track
10-450-245-000-000 525.79
Total : 525.79
62987 2/10/2009 010258 GMAC PAYMENT PROCESSING CENTER 024-9103-15593 '07 TAHOE LEASE
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62987 2/10/2009 -010258 GMAC PAYMENT PROCESSING CENTER(Continued)
10-120-273-000-000 55407
Total : 554.07
62988 2/10/2009 010164 GREAT-WEST JANUARY January Deferred Comp/Loans
10-022-63-00 9,900.74
10-022-64-00 1,197.23
Total : 11,097.97
62989 2/10/2009 010752 GST INC JO1313793 Transfer Belt for Samsung printer
10-180-210-000-000 148.70
Total : 148.70
62990 2/10/2009 003216 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC 09-15186 SEWER MAINT& HYDROWASHING
21-573-602-000-000 700.00
09-15203 SEWER MAINT& HYDROWASHING
21-573-602-000-000 450.00
Total : 1,150.00
62991 2/10/2009 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 05782206-00 Park Maintenance Supplies
10-450-245-000-000 363.01
- - - - - 05792771-00 -LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 39.58
05800452-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 53.93
Total : 456.52
62992 2/10/2009 010339 INT'L COUNCIL/SHOPPING CENTERS 1381945 Member Renewal-B. Cortes
10-110-220-000-000 100.00
Total : 100.00
62993 2/10/2009 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 03591 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
10-450-246-000-000 9935
0545 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
10-450-246-000-000 10341
Total : 202.76
Page. 6
k i 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher . Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
62994 2/10/2009 010812 LOWE'S COMMERCIAL SERVICES 09572 MAINT SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 73.17
14301 MAINT SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 166.62
Total : 239.79
62995 2/10/2009 010690 LSA ASSOCIATES INC 90641F BARTON SQUARE ENVIRON. CONSULTING SRV1
32-600-217-000-000 2,006.25
Total : 2,006.25
62996 2/10/2009 010611 MCNABOE, DARCY DECEMBER December Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
JANUARY January Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 100.00
62997 2/10/2009 010984 MERRILL, LYNN 120408 Prep-Contruc/Demo. Ordinance
10-180-255-000-000 49500
Total : 495.00
62998 2/10/2009 004788 MUNIMETRIX INC 0901006 2009 Software Support
10-125-240-000-000 499.00
Total : 499.00
62999 2/10/2009 001456 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 062073 ID Badge Holders
10-440-210-000-000 9.08
115772 Computer Printer/Toner
10-440-210-000-000 40.46
Total : 49.54
63000 2/10/2009 010663 PHELPS, BRIAN JANUARY January Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
63001 2/10/2009 010995 POLICE SURVIVORS, CA. CHAPTER CON 01302009 Plaque in honor of Sheriff G. Penrod
10-190-220-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
Page 7
vchlist ' Voucher List Page: 8
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
63002 2/10/2009 005663 PRECIE, DENNICE 4TH QTR 2008 4th Qtr Medical Reimb Benefit
10-440-139-000-000 331.75
Total : 331.75
63003 2/10/2009 006528 S.B. COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTER 1735 Svcs Rendered for 11/04/08 Elec.
10-125-221-000-000 7,419.00
Total : 7,419.00
63004 2/10/2009 006531 S B COUNTY SHERIFF 8846 Sheriff Expenses/Overtime
10-410-250-000-000 23,206.50
10-410-256=000-000 4,251.85
Total : 27,458.35
63005 2/10/2009 006435 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 3928 ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
10-190-256-000-000 620.00
Total : 620.00
63006 2/10/2009 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY 02102009 January Utility Charges
34-400-238-000-000 69.18
10-175-238-000-000 25.16
10-172-238-000-000 3145
10-190-238=000-000 2,200 96
10-450-238-000-000 1,41475
10-440-238-000-000 524.14
16-510-238-000-000 433.80
15-500-601-000-000 2576
Total : 4,725.20
63007 2/10/2009 010856 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 252700 PREPARE FREEWAY RETAIL PROJ SPEC PLAN
32-600-205-001-000 2,384.00
Total : 2,384.00
63008 2/10/2009 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 901210473 C. CARE FOOD &.SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 244.12
Total : 244.12
63009 2/10/2009 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 890 TRAFFIC ENG & CONSULTING SRVS
10-180-255-000-000 5-1055.20
Page: 8
vchlist Voucher List s Page: 9
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
63009 2/10/2009 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING (Continued)
892 Traffic Engineering Consulting
10-370-255-000-000 1,142.89
Total : 6,198.09
63010 2/10/2009 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 120090276 DIG ALERT MONTHLY SERVICES
16-900-220-000-000 3750
Total : 37.50
63011 2/10/2009 010605 URBAN FUTURES INCORPORATED 210099 Disclosure Report-'04 Refunding Tabs
33-300-250-000-000 1,750.00
Total : 1,750.00
63012 2/10/2009 007539 VALLEY TIRE COMPANY 88044 New tires for Maintenance Vehicle
10-180-272-000-000 74070
Total : 740.70
63013 2/10/2009 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0729306717 January Cell Phone Usage
34-400-235-000-000 147.46
Total : 147.46
630.14 2/10/2009 007880 WEST GROUP 817603158 CA CODE UPDATES FY 08/09
10-125-250-000-000 562.72
Total : 562.72
63015 2/10/2009 007920 WILLDAN 062-10071 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10-172-250-000-000 2,525.00
062-10072 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10-175-255-000-000 600.00
062-10073 Mt. Vernon Street Improvements
44-200-623-000-000 5,087.50
062-10073A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10-175-255-000-000 7,374.78
Total : 15,587.28
63016 2/10/2009 007925 WILSON, DOUG DECEMBER December Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Page. 9
vchlist Voucher List Page: 10
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
63016 2/10/2009 007925 WILSON, DOUG (Continued)
JANUARY January Commission Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 100.00
63017 2/10/2009 010993 WINZER CORPORATION 3387770 Anti-Graffitti Chemicals
10-180-255-000-000 163.07
Total : 163.07
63018 2/10/2009 007938 WIRZ& COMPANY 55909 Comm Svcs Mailing Envelopes
10-180-210-0007000 103.44
Total : 103.44
63019 2/10/2009 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 038428702 CC 55 COPIER LEASE-
10-190-700-000-000 33449
10-190-700-000-000 21.69
10-190-212-000-000 4.23
038428703 CC265 COPIER LEASE
10-190-700-000-000 270.66
10-190-700-000-000 1806
10-190-212-000-000 2.61
Total : 651.74
63020 2/10/2009 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS 02928620 BOTTLED WATER SERVICE
10-190-238-000-000 255.22
10-440-238-000-000 114.06
10-805-238-000-000 2730
34-400-238-000-000 7.70
Total : 404.28
65 Vouchers for bank code : bofa Bank total : 161,238.65
65 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 161,238.65
Page: 10
vchlist Vaucher List Page: 11
02/04/2009 10:35:08AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency
liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropr-k'te for the operation of City and Agency.
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
Page: 11
PENDING C"COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING -JANUARY 27,2009
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council
Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on January
27, 2009, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor
Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem
Bea Cortes, Councilmember
Jim Miller, Councilmember
Walt Stanckiewitz, Councilmember
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Acting City Manager
Bernard Simon,Finance Director
Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director
Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Lt. Mike Newcombe, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
r-
ABSENT:
Tom Schwab, City Manager
John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department
4:00 PM City Attorney John Harper gave an Ethics Workshop for Council Members, the
Planning Commission and Staff.
The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Mayor Pro Tern Lee Ann Garcia,followed
by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Jim Miller.
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ITEMS TO DELETE -None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2A. Loma Linda Korean Seventh-Day Adventist Church
Acting Cijy Manager Steve Berry,indicated that the City would like to thank the Loma Linda
Korean Seventh-Day Adventist Church for all of their community involvement. He stated
that they have a lot of members that are in the medical field and that they have offered their
services in the event of an emergency. They have been invited to attend a C.E.R.T. and an
E.O.C. Meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 9f'
Council Minutes
01/27/2009
Page 2
Pastor Lee,thanked the Council for the invitation to attend the Council Meeting. He would
like to take this opportunity to thank the City for allowing them to be a greater part of the
Community. It is their desire to have cooperation with the City to provide the help or
assistance that they can be a part of to render to the public. It is their tremendous privilege
and joy to be in partnership with the City and they will do their very best to work along with
the City. He would like to invite the Council and Staff to a special dinner on March 7,2009.
They want to be a part of the greater community and work along with the public sector. He
wished everyone a great year.
Mayor Ferre,presented the Pastor with a Certificate of Appreciation._
Councilmember Stanckiewitz requested that the Korean Seventh-Day Adventist Church be
included in the rotation for the invocation at Council Meetings.
2B. Home of Distinction Award
Acting City Manager.Steve Be rrX announced that Louis & Beverly James at 12286 Reed
Avenue are the recipients of the Home of Distinction Award.
Mayor Ferre presented them with a Certificate and a gift card for Stater Bros. Markets.
i
2C. Presentation by Colton Joint Unified School District on the Status of the New High
School
Alice Grundmand,Director of Facilities,Planning,and Construction gave a status report on
High School #3. She stated that the projected opening date is September, 2011.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-2009-17 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, CARRIED 5-0,to approve the following Consent Calendar Items:
3A. Approve Check Register Dated January 27, 2009
3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
3C. Approval of 01-13-2009 Minutes
3D. Extension of Time for the Existing Stormwater Drainage Facility
Memorandum of Understanding Between Colton Unified School District and
the City of grand Terrace and a Project Budget Appropriation
3E. Treasurer's Report for Quarter Ending September 30, 2008
3F. Treasurer's Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2008
PUBLIC COMMENT
Council Minutes
01/27/2009
Page 3
Tom Schwab, 22687 Lark Street,thanked the Council and Staff and to let them know how
happy he is to see everyone. He indicated that it has been seven months since he was last in
the room,which is the longest time in his 20 years as City Manager that he has been between
Council Meetings. He hopes to join the Council very soon. This illness lasted seven months
and during this illness he equates it to being in a storm. That he has been in a storm for
seven months and there were very dark times during that storm and he wasn't sure that he
was going to be back but the sun has come out and the rain has stopped and he's back. When
you are in a situation and you are stuck in a long storm one must learn to dance in the rain.
Tony Petta, 11875 Eaton Drive, stated that he was happy to see Tom in the audience. Seth
Armstead was not only the first City Manager but he founded Grand Terrace. Seth was a
tremendous City Manager and he knew that some day he would retire and that he would need
a successor and he provided for that. He trained this individual that was hired as a Finance
Officer to eventually take his place. Seth retired in January of 1987. Seth successor was
Tom Schwab. Seth's choice was a good choice and his performance has been great. While
Tom has been away we have been fortunate to have Steve Berry as Acting City Manager
while Tom is on medical leave. Steve has done an excellent job of filling in and are grateful
to him.
r REPORTS
-- 5A. Committee Reports
1. Crime Prevention Committee
a. Minutes of October 13, 2008
CC-2009-18 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the October 13, 2008 Minutes of the Crime
Prevention Committee.
5B. Council Reports
Mayor Pro Tern Lee Ann Garcia,thanked Alice Grundmand for her update. She introduced
Nick Calero, Field Representative for Neil Derry.
Councilmember Walt Stanckiewitz, attended the League of California Cities New Council
Member and Mayors academy with Acting City Manager Steve Berry. It was a very valuable
experience for him and he learned a lot about City Government. It was a very worthwhile
trip. He reported that on February 18, 2009 between 8:30 and noon a business survival
workshop will be hosted by the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development
Department and requested that Community and Economic Development Director Joyce
Powers give more information.
Community and Economic Development Director Joyce Powers,stated that they are planning
Council Minutes
01/27/2009
Page 4
a cooperative effort with the County Workforce Development Center, City of Loma Linda,
City of Redlands and the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center. The purpose
is to outreach to businesses who may not be doing well in the current climate that they are
in and to offer some suggestions on how to collect on receivables that they are having trouble
with or reaching out to new customers. They will have the Inland Empire Small Business
Development Center offer a couple of programs that she is very interested in offering. They
offer business assessments, they also offer some general training to help businesses learn
how to bid on government proposals. They don't expect that the general session will take
all morning but they have scheduled the time to allow for individual meetings with the
various staff that she mentioned.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz,stated that the California Earthquake Authority has a website
www.earthquakeauthority.com and you can request a starter kit that includes items that you
may need to help secure things in the event of an earthquake. He reported that he went by
the Child Care Center and things are going well. They are offering through the end of April
free registration,the fourth week free and 15% off tuition for the first three months.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6A. An Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Amending Chapter 15.09.20 California
Existing Building Code,Title 15 Chapters 15.09.20 of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code Relating to Repairs of Damaged Structures.
Building and Safg /Public Works Director Rich Shields, stated that currently, the 2007
California Building Code Chapter 34, Existing Buildings, does not provide for damaged
structures to be repaired or reconstructed to a structurally safe level,accounting for upgrades
in wind and seismic standards. The inability to repair structures based upon the most recent
industry knowledge, thus preventing or mitigating future unnecessary damage or injury, is
not in the best interest of the citizens we are tasked.with assisting. This ordinance would
authorize the Federal Emergency Management Association(FEMA)to fund the repair and
restoration of eligible government,non-profit facilities as well as privately funded structures
damaged in a presidentially declared disaster. Staff recommends that the City council
approve the Ordinance amending Chapter 34 ofthe 2007 California Building Code providing
criteria for accounting for upgrades in wind and seismic standards insuring structural safety.
CC-2009-19 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the first reading of an Ordinance of the City
of Grand Terrace Amending Chapter 15.09.20 California Existing Building Code,
Title 15 Chapters 15.09.20 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Relating to Repairs
of Damaged Structures.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace,Adding Chapter 15.58
Council Minutes
01/27/2009
Page 5
Relating to Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste
CC-2009-20 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CORTES,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER,
MILLER,CARRIED 5-0,to approve the second reading of an Ordinance of the City
of Grand Terrace, Adding Chapter 15.58 Relating to Recycling and Diversion of
Construction and Demolition Waste.
7B. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California Rescinding the Traffic Circulation Fee Schedule(4.104)and Replacing it
with a New Fee Structure
CC-2009-21 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CORTES, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Second Reading of an Ordinance of the
City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Rescinding the Traffic
Circulation Fee Schedule (4.104) and Replacing it with a New Fee Structure.
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Quarterly Financial Update through December 31, 2008
CC-2009-22 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Quarterly Financial Update
through December 31, 2008.
CLOSED SESSION
9A. Employee Compensation-Acting City Manager
Mayor Ferre announced that the Council met in Closed Session to discuss Employee Compensation-
Acting City Manager and there was no reportable action taken. The Council is continuing this
Closed Session to a Special Meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. adding
an additional item which will be the performance evaluation for the Acting City Manager.
Mayor Ferre adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m., until the next City Council Meeting which is
scheduled to be held on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - FEBRUARY 3 2009
A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council
Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on February
3, 2009, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor
Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tern
Bea Cortes, Councilmember
Jim Miller, Councilmember
Walt Stanckiewitz, Councilmember
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Acting City Manager
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT: Tom Schwab, City Manager
Bernard Simon, Finance Director
Joyce Powers, Community& Economic Development Director
Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director
Lt. Mike Newcombe, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department
The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Mayor Pro Tern Lee Ann Garcia,followed
by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilwoman Bea Cortes.
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. CLOSED SESSION - Employee Compensation and Evaluation - Acting City
Manager
Mayor Ferr6 announced that the Council met in Closed Session to discuss Employee
Compensation and Evaluation-Acting City Manager and that there was no reportable action
taken.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT -None
Mayor Ferr6 adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m., until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which
is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
DATE: January 29,2009
W.O.# 12.674
STAFF"- REPORT_
CRA O COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Completion of the City Hall Fire Detection Installation
FUNDING REQUIRED_ NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
On August 8, 2008 the City Council approved the contract awarding Champion Fire Systems, Inc.,the
contract to install the City Hall fire detection system.
The installation of the fire detection system was two fold. First the alarms were installed throughout the
building to alert occupants of smoke or heat in the City Hall building allowing them extra time to exit the
building. Second, the fire alarm system is being monitored by a private monitoring company. In the event
the building is not occupied, the fire alarm system will detect smoke and heat and will dispatch fire
personnel to City Hall.
Champion Fire Systems was awarded the bid of$65,000.00. While under construction it was noticed that
the new Honeywell air conditioning units did not have detection to shut down the units in the event of a fire.
The Honeywell units were then retrofitted with detection devices. The cost of the detection devices for all
units totaled $6,515.00. The San Bernardino County Fire Department finaled the system on January 27,
2009.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Accept the project as complete.
2. Direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.3�)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE .--
Regular Meeting ` --) O 2009
MINUTES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
January 6, 2009 CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by
Chairperson, Vic Pfennighausen at 6:00 p.m. Agendas were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT—Vic Pfennighausen, Randy Halseth, Jim Vert, Debra Hurst, JoAnn
Johnson, Glenn Nichols and Lew Neeb.
MEMBERS ABSENT—Susan Taylor, Oscar Santana and Hanni Bennett.
CITY STAFF—Matt Wirz
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS— Nick Calero, Field Representative for Supervisor,
Neil Derry.
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS
a. E-Mail from Alternate member, Bob Stewart indicating that he must resign from the
Emergency Operations Committee due to his recent move to Riverside.
b. E-Mail from Hanni Bennett indicating her husband had broken his hip and was awaiting
surgery. She would not be attending tonight's meeting.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA with the addition under New Business, item c. Resignation of
Alternate Member, Bob Stewart. Motion by Lew Neeb and second by Glenn Nichols.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2008 with motion by Debra Hurst and second
by Lew Neeb.
LIAISON REPORT by Matt Wirz.
a. Steve Berry is attending a special City Council meeting tonight.
b. An additional approximately$800 is needed to purchase the Travelers Radio System. It is
hoped that CERT can contribute the additional amount. If the additional funding is received
we will contact the provider for a frequency search.
c. The control station will probably be located in Matt's station at City Hall if the antenna
can be installed near there.
d. This is an AM radio system and the frequency search would cost approximately$200 and
would involve finding the clearest frequency.
e. It would be desirable to have signs up at the entrances of the city indicating the frequency
to tune to for various information..
f. Matt said that Steve had not given him any additional information about the attempt to
acquire some land on Blue Mountain.
g. The Birthday Celebration went very well.
h. He reported on a meeting he attended of the Urban Area Security Initiative. This meeting
was focused on what would happen if there were an act of terrorism. He explained how the
funding was divided into Tier 1 and Tier 2 depending on the population of urban areas. We
would be a part of the Tier 2 areas covering San Bernardino and Riverside.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.JPOI -
1
i. There will be another meeting coming up and much more information will be available..
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
a. Vic told of the ongoing problems with the telephones every time it rains. He has a file
he has kept for about 5 years and all the difficulties with the phones.
b. After a long discussion recently perhaps some progress has been made. The phones did
not go out during the last rain.
c. We must have a list of all the MURS radios and who has checked them out. Randy
indicated that he does have the list.
d. Not much has been done re the Satellite Phone Directory,but it has been pretty much
determined that using a directory rather than trying to program everything into the phone 3
will be much simpler.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Randy wanted to know if CERT could have a second generator for their trailer. Vic
indicated that this would be fine. Leaving 3 generators for Emergency Operations.
NEW BUSINESS
a. Randy indicates that CERT is moving along. He and Jeff went to an informational
meeting of COAD and will be attending more in the future.
b. Randy also indicates that CERT is in need of medical supplies.
c. He said also that Wilden Pump has offered the use of their facilities for CERT training.
d. CERT training will take place again every Thursday in March.
e. By Laws for CERT must be finalized to make certain that things are done correctly and .
that funds are used properly. This includes the possibility of helping to fund the Travelers _
Radio System.
f. Randy,Jeff and Vic put the MURS antenna together on Monday and it is ready to install
at Randy's house. A radio will also be installed in Matt's work station at City Hall.
g. Vic made the motion that we accept with regrets, the resignation of Bob Stewart. Lew
Neeb seconded and the Secretary was instructed to send of note of thanks for his help in the
past. Will also write Action Item to City Council indicating the resignation.
h. Vic continues to urge us to make arrangements for a new Chairperson. There was
considerable discussion on how we might pursue a new Chairperson as well
as how we might possibly approach the Activation/Exercise in April from a little
different perspective. Everyone will be thinking of our options.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS
ADJ URNMEN t 6:4 p.m.
JoAnn John/son, Secretary
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2009 AT 6 P.M.
a
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: February 10, 2009
FUNDING REQUIRED ( ) NO FUNDING REQUIRED (X)
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 08-02 (TPM No. 19131), Vacation of
Right-of-Way and Environmental 08-03
APPLICANT: Dr. Robert Ha
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue,
and northwest corner of Britton Way and Mount Vernon
Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0275-251-14, 2127, 30, 31,
32,55, 73 and 74)
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Conduct the Public Hearing and vote to adopt a
Resolution to Vacate ordering the vacation of a portion
of Public Street known as Britton Way.
2. Conduct the Public Hearing and vote to adopt a
Resolution of Approval approving Tentative Parcel
Map 08-02 (TPM No. 19131) and Environmental 08-03.
Background:
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map 08-2 to consolidate nine lots
totaling 3.6 acres into four new parcels for the purpose of developing a commercial center. The
commercial center will contain approximately 41,000 square feet of commercial space. The
majority of the project site is zoned BRSP-Village Commercial with that portion of the site north
of Britton Way zoned Administrative Professional. The project site is located at the northwest
corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, extending approximately 80 feet north of
Britton Way.
Also submitted with the Tentative Parcel Map were Site and Architectural Review 08-09 and
Conditional Use Permit 08-05 to establish the site and building design of the commercial center
and the associated uses. On December 18, 2008, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 A
1
City Council Agenda Report
Barton Square Tentative Parcel Map
Page 2 of 3
of Approval approving the Site and Architectural Review and Conditional Use Permit
applications, and recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 08-02.
Tentative Parcel May 08-02
A copy of Tentative Parcel Map 08-02 is included as Attachment 1. Each proposed parcel will
contain a commercial structure with associated landscaping, parking and related infrastructure.
Reciprocal parking,access, drainage and maintenance agreements will be recorded with the final
map,which is common practice with commercial centers.
Development standards regulating the dimensions and area of the newly created lots are
contained in the Barton Road Specific Plan ("BRSP") and,Zoning Code. The BRSP-states that
lot assembly should provide for a minimum of 300 feet of street frontage, where it can't be
provided, provisions for shared access with adjacent parcels should be established. The
developer is showing a shared access point at the west property line. Should the property to the
west redevelop, the adjacent property owner can take advantage of the access point. That portion
of the site (north of Britton Way) subject to .the Administrative Professional provisions of the
Zoning Code is consistent with the lot dimensions and minimum area requirements of that zone
district.
In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is dedicating
additional right of way along both Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Dedication and
improvement of right of way are standard development conditions. r
Vacation of Right-of-Way
On November 19, 2008, Staff received a Street Vacation Application from the applicant
(Attachment 2) requesting to vacate a portion of Britton Way that runs through the project site.
That portion of Britton Way would be designed as a private drive aisle serving the project, but it
will still be accessible to the general public to travel east or west through the project site.
Easements for underground utilities would also be retained within the vacated portion of Britton
Way. The applicable utility companies were contacted to obtain their consent to the vacation.
Copies of the consent letters are attached as (Attachment 3). That portion of Britton Way
proposed to be vacated is shown on Exhibit B of Attachment 9. On December 18, 2008 the
Planning Commission found the vacation in conformance with the General Plan and
recommended approval by the City Council.
Vacation proceedings must be conducted in accordance with Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 3 of the
Streets and Highway Code. A Resolution of Intent on the proposed vacation was adopted on
January'15, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-01). A Public Hearing must be conducted and noticing
must be done for two consecutive weeks prior to the Hearing. Additionally, that portion of the
street proposed to be vacated must be posted stating the date and time of the public hearing. A
signed affidavit verifying the street posting has been completed by the Public Works Director. A
copy of the Resolution of Intent, Public Hearing Notice, Affidavit of Posting, and photographs of
the posted sign are attached, as Attachments 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively.
Y V\TPM CC Hearing\CC Rpt 2.10.09-Barton Plaza.doc
City Council Agenda Report
Barton Square Tentative Parcel Map
Page 3 of 3
To vacate a public street the City Council must be able to make the necessary findings that the
street is not needed for present or future use and/or that there is public benefit derived from the
vacation. Relief from the burden of maintenance of a roadway has been determined to be of
sufficient public benefit. Britton Way will still exist for public use to and from Mount Vernon
Avenue. A utility easement in Britton Way will be held by the City for the purpose of utility
installations and repairs of existing utilities.
Fiscal Impact•
This proposed vacation of the road will relieve the City of responsibility for maintenance of the
street portion of Britton Way. The cost for preparation of maps and legal descriptions will be
borne by the petitioner.
Environmental Review:
An Environmental Initial Study ("IS") and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") were
prepared by LSA Associates, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The IS and MND were made available for public review and comment from November 26, 2008
to December 15, 2008, and is included in Attachment 8.
The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the
environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all
potential impacts to insignificant levels with respect to Geology, Transportation/Circulation,
Biological Resources, Hazards, Noise and Cultural Resources, as more thoroughly discussed in
the attached IS and MND.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Conduct the Public Hearing for TPM 08-02 and Vacation of Right-of-Way;
(2) Adopt the Resolution to Vacate(Attachment 9) for the Vacation of Right-of-Way; and
(3) Adopt the Resolution of Approval (Attachment 10) approving Tentative Parcel Map 08-02
(TPM No. 19131) and Environmental 08-03
Attachments: 1. Tentative Parcel Map 08-02
2. Street Vacation application
3. Consent letters from utility companies
4. Resolution of Intent
5. Public hearing notice
6. Affidavit of Posting
7. Photographs of signs
8. Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study
9. Resolution to Vacate
10. Resolution of Approval of TPM 08-02 and E 08-03
Y\Project Files\SA 08-09 Barton Plaza Project NWC Barton.Mt V\TPM CC Hearing\CC Rpt 2.10.09-Barton Plaza.doc
3
? - City of C►rand'Terrace Attachment 2
Public Works Department
Street Vacation Application
For Applicant's Use: —
The"Applicant",as undersigned below,hereby requests permission to vacate the following street(s):
Street Name and Location of Street to be Vacated:
&-I��O� MT.
Applicant: �' ontact Person: V 1� - Tel#: —[�7 27
Address' &j 0 N"c 2114 Tel#:
(steep (CAy) (Zip) 2
Contractor:(If Applicable) Lic.#: Tel#:
Applicant's Signature Date: 2'
Please print name:
Completed application shall be submitted to City of Grand Terrace,Public Works Department 22795 Barton Road,Suite B Grand Terrace,CA 92313
For City's Use
Approval of this Application by the City,covers only the requested operations and'location(s)described above.The applicant agrees to
comply with any and all City Ordinances.Said operations shall be performed in accordance with applicable City requirements for such
work,and as directed by the City's Public Works Director,and/or City Staf.The applicant shall Contact the City,a minim„*„of
twenty-four(24)hours prior to beginning any operations within the City,at(909)825-3925.Failure to comply with these noted
requirements,as stated herein,shall be grounds for immediate revocation of permissions granted here under.
Total Fee Amount Paid: Check Number:
Estimated Start Date: Estimated'Completion Date:
t]Business License Required
Public Works Director: Date:
Final Street Vacation Approval:
Dates of Inspection:
Final Approval By: Date:
Attachment 3
Civil Engineering.*Land Surveying•Planning
Li
Kevin Purdy, Service Planner
Southern California Edison JAN 2 9 2009
287 Tennessee Street
Redlands, CA 92373(909) 307-6759 DEPT OF BUILDING SAFETY
November 12, 2008
L Subject: REQUEST FOR UTILITY APPROVAL OF THE VACATION OF:
Grand Terrace-Mt. Vernon Ave & Barton Rd.
Dear Mr. Purdy:
As the property owner, developer or owner's agent of the property located at Mt.
Vernon Ave. & Barton Road,we are applying to the City of Grand Terrace for the
vacation of Mt.Vernon Ave. & Barton Rd. adjacent to or across your property. One of
the requirements of the City's application is the consent of your company to vacate, or
vacate with the retention of an easement which meets your requirements.
Attached for your convenience are copies of the following:
Assessors Parcel Map for APN's 0275-251-014, -021, -027, -030,-031, -032, -041, -047, -055
Tentative Tract Number 19131
Plat of the property showing easement/right of way to be vacated
Property description and/or description easement
If you have any questions, please contact me at 951-353-2300 or at brianc@cae-inc.com
Sincerely, r �1 �
Collins &Associates Engineering c t)2n-�-s +D
llVa-I CV�, n w A c,
Pr �ke ahDV� PrbE��.
Brian Collins
Chief Executive Officer ���/!•���/J,:���
5
aoutnern ,anturma aas%.ompany
1981 W Lugonia Avenue
Redlands,CA 92374-9720
The
Gas Mailing Address:
Company- PO Box 3003,SC8031
Redlands,CA 92373-0306
A*Sempra Energy company
January 14,2009
Department of Building and Safety
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Suite B
Grand Terrace,CA 92313
Attn: Richard Shields
(909) 825-3825
Re: Proposed Vacation of Britton Way, Grand Terrace, CA
Southern California Gas Company owns and operates a gas pipeline beneath the portion of street
that is proposed to be vacated. In accordance with Section No. 8330 of the Streets and Highways
Code, The Gas Company hereby requests that an easement be reserved to ensure the continued
operation of this pipeline.
The Gas Company is requesting a copy of the recorded vacation document upon its completion.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions, please call me at(909) 335-7733.
Sincerely,
Gertman Thomas
Right of Way
South Inland Region
Encl.
RECEIVEt
►� I r REr.
South Inland Esmt Ltr 212005
k
- > 12374 Michigan Street • Grand Terrace,CA 92313-5602 • (909)825-4128 • FAX(909)825-1715
Pd°�NSERV��ro� P RECEIVED IVED
January 27, 2009 JAN 2 7 2009
City of Grand Terrace DEPT OF BUILDING SAFETY
Attn: Richard Shields
22795 Barton Road
j Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Re: Parcel Map 19131
Dear Mr. Shields;
Riverside Highland Water Company has an 8" Water Main in the street right-of-way on
Britton Way.
Riverside Highland Water Company has no problem with the vacation of this street as
long as this 8" Water Main remains in the pavement portion of the new street.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at(909)
825-4128.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
01-6
Rich Haubert
Distribution Superintendent
RNH/ss
7
RECEIVED
January 22, 2009 JAN 2 6 2009
CABLE
r of euuniNG sale
THE POWER OF YOU"
Richard Shields, Director of Building & Safety / Public Works
Department of Building and Safety
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Suite B
Grand Terrace. CA 92313
(909) 825-3825 Fax (909) 825-7506
Subject: Request for Utility Approval of the Vacation of location:
Grand Terrace — Mt. Vernon Ave & Barton Rd.
To Whom It May Concern:
Please consider this letter as notification on behalf of Time Warner Cable to vacate as
set fourth by the City for Assessor Parcel Map for APN's 0275-251-014,-021,-027,
-030, -031, -032, -041, -047, -055.
Tentative Tract Number 19131
Sincerely,
Time Warner Cable -
James Mock
Manager, Construction
(909) 975-3439 Fax (909) 975-3471
F
t1LLQL,ll lllG ll l `f
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A
PORTION OF BRITTON WAY, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A
HEARING TO PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO THE
PROPOSED VACATION, PROVIDING FOR POSTING PURSUANT TO THE
STREET VACATION ACT AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 8300 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace as follows:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Street Vacation Act and pursuant to Section 8300 et
seq of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, the City Council of the
City of Grand Terrace declares intention to vacate a portion of Britton Way described on
attached Exhibit"A".
Section 2. That a Hearing is to be conducted on the 10t'day of February, 2009, at the
hour of 6:00 p.m. at. the City Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace
California, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation
will be heard.
Section 3. Notices of said vacation shall be posted conspicuously along the street or
part thereof proposed to be vacated at least ten days before the date set for the Hearing,
Said Notices shall be posted not more than 300 feet apart, but at least three (3) shall be
posted. Said Notices shall state the time and place of the Hearing. Said Notices shall be
posted by the Public Works Director, and thereafter he shall file an affidavit of posting
with the City Clerk.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be posted within fifteen (15)
days after its'adoption in three(3)public places established by the City Council.,
ADOPTED this 13`h day of January, 2009.
/
• Y t�'
Ivlaaryetta Ferre', Mayor`"
ATTEST:
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
9
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND '1'ERRALE
DATE: Tuesday, February 10, 2009
PLACE: Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313
TIME: 6:00 P. M.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE IS SCHEDULED TO HOLD
A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE ABOVE TIME AND PLACE REGARDING THE
FOLLOWING ITEM:
Barton Plaza:' A proposal to consolidate nine lots totaling 3.6 acres into four new parcels
Tentative Parcel for the purpose of developing a commercial center. The project site is zoned
Map 08-02 (TPM Village Commercial within the Barton Road Specific Plan and
No. 19131), and E Administrative Commercial.
08-03: On December 18, 2008 the Planning Commission approved the development
s
of the commercial center that included the vacation of a portion of Britton
Vacation a Way, and recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map
portion of street 08-02.
known as Britton
Way, maintain a Pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 8323, a Public
utility easement in Hearing will also be conducted on the Vacation of a portion of public street
vacated street. known as Britton Way approximately 375 feet west of Mount Vernon
Avenue in the City of Grand Terrace.
APPLICANT: Dr. Robert Ha
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Barton Road an&Mount Vernon Avenue, and northwest
corner of Britton Way and' Mount Vernon Avenue (Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 0275-251-14, 21 27, 30, 31, 32, 55, 73 and 74)
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared for the project on the basis that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on
the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce potential impacts
relating to Geology, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Hazards, Noise and Cultural
Resources to levels of insignificance. Plans for the proposed project, and a copy of the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for public-review at the offices of the Community
and Economic Development Department in City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road in Grand
Terrace, California during normal business hours.
Anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the above listed items will be given the
opportunity to do so before the City Council. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b)(2):
"If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the public entity conducting, the hearing at or prior to the public
hearing".
If you have any questions regarding this project, the public hearing or this notice, please contact
Senior Planner Sandra Molina, in the Community and Economic Development Department office,
via telephone at(909) 430-2247, or via email at smolina(-Ocityofs randterracLM.
Y.\Project Files\SA 08-09 Barton Plaza Project NWC Barton.Mt V\TPM CC Hearing\TPM&Vacation Hearing Notice.doc
10
Attachment 6
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Richard Shields, duly appointed Superintendent of Streets and Director of
Public Works, City of Grand Terrace, California; hereby certifies that on
January 20, 2009 I posted the "Notice of Street Vacation" at (3) three
locations along the portion of Britton Way to be vacated.
(A portion of Britton Way west of Mount Vernon Avenue).
Date: /- A U, vp DD 9
Richard Shields, CBO
Director of Building and Safety/Public Works
11
} ! .?z * a 4 "'{W. , + f - � - r7s,:j A.-. 4 . + ,,i` ,t r F •+ t, � � ! �7
a
6 eM' !'t q �;�' � ,r,; �'`i�1 A.kY jti a lfx j {,��^w.7`+s�!! �s ! !, � �! � ��.l4 h��t✓C+Y.,c�eY-C.` �*�~.',r � k',
74, 'f -?> rwry ' - '
�.'k. � q�4 � pr "�� � Lam' y.. .'X� r�•4sa�3*�' - � .E�r�.,,r� � +y T�.
�.w .
NOTICE OF iUNCIL HEAR
ON PROPOSED ABANDOMENT
OF BRITTON WAY
i DATE: February 10, ••• For MoreInformation Contact:
. 0• .
.: of •
Terrace
22795 Barton -.
BattonCouncil Chambers Grand Terrace, CA
22795 .0.
Grand Terrace, CA
wJt:a i i�st.,Lr •\+►s�r`
\ .,a \'ii i��'px"L`� iw�.f-. Ili+ 'F l+ti.• �.r J F,K�, .' ,,�,
n
i a,,,.,,, ,+f,a .y! "'�' 'c9 .Y.+•--�.►•Np,�A
r
-" tR .-..r. x lJ�..i� ..•i: r - ,i.'.-� �+f._ �S'�tk�...� t� -,! -J'
°t �;-v11.,^.._ '1 M�i►�a.- +_',,1'\; 'Jr� s y� tr i�j ;N�i'i+ry.ti' rr�� ,t,�" ++d'sC i���''� .\ .` �,r
�stt• ? ru .:iP* �.Ki N •�_. r�-x•R �1 •E• ! 1 s,� � E �3
' �-.. .�, fii?",#'� �+.c'tx.r`''a��.�+i:' iarSr.-.^µ.'rr s1 �f ��[ t,5 '�' - .j.4 :f'•^�
r,`� .s � T =sr„yi'+'�% .�y'+"is-n� "4 3 it ;�,�.,a„�4v,.,K-v �•
a�` x
L lL4fl�.11lll�.liL V
c�rr l
DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Date: November 26, 2008
Project Title: Site and Architectural Review 08-09, Conditional Use Permit 08-05, Tentative
Parcel Map 08-02 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131),Vacation of Right of Way,
and Environmental 08-03
r-.
Project Location: Northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, and northwest
corner of Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Numbers
0275-251-14, 2127,30, 31, 32, 55, 73 and 74)
Description of Project: A proposal to redevelop approximately 3.6 acres of land by demolishing
existing structures, retaining a 6,900 square foot commercial building, and constructing a 24-hour 14,820
square foot drug store with prescription pick up window, a 24-hour 13,969 square foot grocery store, and
a 5,300 square foot multi-tenant restaurant. A portion of Britton Way is proposed to be vacated, but
maintained as a private driveway. Associated parking, landscaping, and lighting will be constructed.
Under the Tentative Parcel Map nine lots will be consolidated qualifying the project for development
incentives. The project site is zoned Village Commercial within the Barton Road Specific Plan and
Administrative Commercial.
Project Proponent: Dr. Robert Ha
ti
Lead Agency: City of Grand Terrace,Community and Economic Development Department
Contact Person: Sandra Molina, Senior Planner
(900)430-2247
Public Hearing: Planning Commission-Thursday,December 18,2008 at 7:00 P.M.
Environmental Finding: On the basis of the Initial Study prepared for the project, it has been
determined that the project been modified to incorporate the mitigation measures listed below so that it
would not have a potentially significant effect on the environment. A copy of said Initial Study is
available for review from November 26, 2008 to December 15, 2008 at the Community and Economic
Development Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313. This document
,constitutes a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
GE0-01 The design and construction of all structures and facilities within the project limits shall
be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the City of Grand Terrace,
applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Uniform Building Code, and/or the site-specific
geotechnrcal investigation prepared for the proposed project.
TRANS-01 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall participate in a fair-
share contribution, via the payment of develepmeat impae traffic signal fees, for the installation of a
trat'fic signal at the study area intersections of:
a. Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road;
b. Mount Vernon Avenue/Van Buren Avenue; and
1,2
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Barton Plaza
Page 2 of 4
C. Mount Vernon Avenue/Main Street.
TRANS-02 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall participate in a fair-
share funding, via the payment of deve!VHVff"m arterial im rovement fees, for construction of
a. An additional southbound left-turn lane at the I-215 southbound ramps
intersection with Barton Road; and
1 b. An additional eastbound through lane at the Barton Road intersection with the I-
215 northbound ramps.
These improvements shall require widening the Barton Road bridge deck of I-215 to
provide two through lanes in the eastbound direction between the I-215 southbound and
northbound ramps.
TRANS-03 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall participate in a fair-
share funding,via the payment of&Ve}ePffieflt- xp arterial improvement fees, for construction of:
a. An additional northbound left-turn lane and exclusive eastbound right-turn lane at
the Michigan Avenue/Barton Road intersection; and
b. A right-turn overlap phase for the eastbound right-turn movement shall be added
to the signal operations at the Michigan Avenue/Barton Road intersection.
TRANS-04 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall provide evidence to
the City that the following improvements have been included in construction plans:
a. Construction left-turn pocket with storage for at least two vehicles south of
Britton Way; and
b. Complete half-section improvements to Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road
adjacent to the project.
TRANS-05 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the project proponent shall provide evidence to
the City that the following improvements and standards have been included in construction plans:
13�:a. Project Access 1/Barton Road allowance of a break in the median to allow left
turns into project site;
e,b. Project Access 2/Barton Road is restricted to right-in/right-out access;
4-.L. Project Access 3/Mount Vernon Avenue is restricted to nght-in/right-out access;
e7d. A 50 foot left-turn pocket at Project Access 1/Barton Road it m a raised median
along Barton Road is constructed west'of Project Access 1.
f:e. A left turn pocket for vehicles traveling north on Mount Vernon Avenue south of
the intersection with Britton Way. The left turn pocket shall be of sufficient
length to accommodate at least two vehicles (50 feet) and is recommended to be
back-to-back with the existing left-turn lane on Mount Vernon Avenue/Barton
Road.
V\p—i—t Riloc Q A nQ nn o____nl-__n__ ......... .. _ _
15
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Barton Plaza
Page 3 of 4
*f. Sight distance at all project access points should be reviewed with respect to
Caltrans and City of Grand Terrace sight distance standards at the time of
preparation of final grading, landscape, and street improvements;
I h g. Install stop signs, stop bars,and stop legends at all project access points; and
i.h. Internal traffic signing/striping should be implemented in conjunction with
detailed construction plans for the project.
BIO-01 Removal of existing on-site trees must be conducted outside the avian nesting season
(February through August). If construction occurs during the'avian nesting season, the project
applicant shall provide evidence to the City that a pre-construction nesting bird survey has been
conducted within 7 days prior to any ground disturbance activities. If birds are found to be nesting
inside or within 250 feet(500 feet for raptors) of the area of constraint, the nest or nesting tree plus a
250-foot buffer must be flagged and avoided until it is determined by a qualified biologist that active
nesting no longer is occurring.
HAZ-01 Prior to the initiation of demolition activities, the applicant shall provide evidence to the
City that contractors' and subcontractors conducting work in the affected structures have been
appropriately notified to the presence and location of ACM and have been informed that disturbance
of ACM is prohibited.
HAZ-02 Prior the demolition of the on-site structures, the applicant shall provide evidence to the
City that ACM has been appropriately removed and disposed of. The removal of any on-site ACM
shall be performed by a certified and licensed asbestos abatement contractor. All removal, disposal, r
and handling of any ACM shall be in accordance with current federal, State, and local agency
ordinances,laws,and regulations.
HAZ-03 The City shall be immediately notified in the event.malodorous or discolored soils,
liquids, containers, or other materials known or suspected to contain'hazardous materials and/or
contaminants are encountered during on-site demolition, grading and construction. Earthmoving
activities in the vicinity of said material shall be halted until the extent and nature of the suspect
material is determined by qualified personnel (as determined by the City). The removal and/or
disposal of any such contaminants shall be in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal
standards.
NOS-01 During all project site excavation and grading on site, the project contractors shall
equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers
consistent with manufacturers' standards.
NOS-02 The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted
noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
NOS-03 The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that would create
the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest
the project site during all project construction.
NOS-04 On-site construction activities shall be restricted to the hours permitted under the City's
Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance limits construction activities between the hours of 7-00 a.m.
and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays.
16
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Barton Plaza
Page 4 of 4
I NOS-05 A four-foot shielding wall shall be constructed along the northern portion of the west Side
of the Fresh& Easy building loading dock to reduce the impact of operational noise from the loading
dock on the residential sensitive receptors to the northwest of the project.
CUL-01 In the event that a paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resource are
uncovered during the course of the construction phase of the project, ground disturbing activities in
the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by
a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource
uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or
removed per applicable City and/or State regulations.
Signature:
Joyce Powers
Community and Economic Development Director
Date:
a �
Y'.Prniert Filvc\CA f1R_110 R-*n..01.. D...:..,..r nv.—n_—__
17
City of Grand Terrace
Community and Economic Development Department
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project Title: Barton Plaza
Site and Architectural Review 08-09,Conditional Use
Permit 08-05,Tentative Parcel Map 08-02(Tentative
Parcel Map No. 19131), Vacation of Right of Way,
and Environmental 08=03
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace
Community and Economic Development Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace,California 92313
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Sandra Molina,' Senior Planner(909)430-2218
4. Project Location: The northwest comer of Barton Road and Mount
Vernon Avenue and the northwest comer of Britton
Way and Mount Vernon Avenue.
Assessors Parcel Numbers:
275-251-014, 275-251-021,275-251-027,
275-251-030, 275-251-031,275-251-032,
275-251-055,275-251-073, and 275-251-074.
5. Project Sponsor's Name: Dr. Robert Ha
5661 Ocean Terrace Drive
Huntington Beach,California 92648
6. General Plan Designation: Existing:General Commercial and Office Commercial
Proposed:Existing designations to remain
7. Zoning: Existing: BRSP-Village Commercial and
Administrative,Professional
Proposed: Existing zoning to remain
8. Description of Project:
As identified in Figure 1, the approximately 3.6 acre project site is located at the northwest
comer of Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace(City). The
site is located within the City's Barton Road Specific Plan.The majority of the project site
have previously been developed with commercial buildings and uses lacking any unifying
elements. Based on the site plan provided by the City, development of the proposed
commercial uses will necessitate the removal of two multiple-tenant buildings and a single
tenant building along Barton Road(Barton Center)and one building along Mount Vernon
Avenue(Neighborhood Postal). Additional structures and features(an abandoned hobby race
Barton Plaza l Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
18
track) that will be removed to accommodate the proposed project are located north of the
Barton Road buildings. The property north of Britton Way is undeveloped and has
previously been disced. Portions of the project site north of the buildings located along
Barton Road are paved or covered with gravel. Scattered ornamental trees are located on
portions of the site.
The proposed project will entail the demolition of several on-site structures.As illustrated in
Figure 2,the approximately 6,900-square foot multiple-tenant structure located at the comer
I of Barton Road and Mount Vemon Avenue-will be retained and rehabilitated so as to
compliment the proposed on-site uses.In addition to the existing 6,900 square foot building,
the proposed project consists of the development of approximately 35,200 square feet of new
commercial uses,and outdoor seating.The proposed on-site uses include:an approximately
14,820-square foot 24-hour drug store (with pick-up window), an approximately 14,000-
square foot 24-hour grocery store to include alcohol sales, and a 5,300-square foot multi-
tenant restaurant with 750 square feet of outdoor seating,which would include alcohol sales.
In total,the commercial center will encompass approximately 41,000 square feet ofbuilding
area,and about 1,250 square feet of outdoor dining area.The proposed project includes the
installation of 161 parking spaces, landscaping, and lighting features and will require
connections to existing utility features. Because the site is currently served by utilities,the
extension of utility infrastructure to the site is not required.Access to the project site will be
two driveways on Barton Road and one driveway on Mount Vernon Avenue. Britton Way
will be vacated to a private street;however access to the existing uses to the east will remain,
and will also provide access to the commercial uses(to the south)and restaurant uses(to the
t r north).
Site and Architectural Review 08-09 and Conditional Use Permit 08-05 have been submitted
to establish the site and building design of the commercial center and the associated uses.
Tentative Parcel Map 08-02 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131) has been submitted to
consolidate the nine underlying lots and create four new underlying lots,and a vacation of
right of way has been submitted to re-designate Britton Way as a private driveway with
public access. In accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan, the developer is allowed
development incentives when lots are consolidated. In-this instance, nine separate lots are
being consolidated into a cohesive shopping center with four underlying parcels. The
developer is requesting development incentives related to a reduction in the number of
required parking spaces,and a reduction of the amount of required onsite landscaping.
The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets. Adjacent
land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas' station to the south
(across Barton Road),the CVS shopping center and single-family residential uses to the east
(across Mount Vernon Avenue), a 'nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family
residences to the north,and commercial,day care and multiple-family residential uses to the
west.
Barton Plaza 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
19
9. Surrounding Land Uses, General Plan Designations, and Zoning:
Direction Zoning General Plan Existing Land qSingle
North Administrative Professional(AP) Office Commercial Vacant/Commercial
East Barton Road Specific Plan-Village Commercial General Commercial General Commercial
and Single Family Residential(111-7.2) Family Residential
South Barton Road Specific Plan-Village Commercial lGeneral Commercial lCommercial
est jBarton Road Specific Plan-Village Commercial lGeneral Commercial lCommercial
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
■ City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety: Building and grading
permits.
■ County of San Bernardino Fire Department: Plan check review and approval.
■ Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region: Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan, Water Quality Management Plan.
■ Riverside Highland Water Company: Water connection.
■ City of Grand Terrace Public Works: Street storm drain and utilities.
Barton Plaza 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
21
I SeV684 I -W tvt
.Vr: Wdo
N
%
T
W.,
N..; ......
V
3
t AM 9? '9i.�;• \" ' •4l� rfhjw I" i �- ai _ =
T i
k,—
Project Location
tell-
Te
rk
A—*
NO
-4.0
L 1,74
I. All,
k
Ic
-gi
PO
NX
-:� Regional Location
82'
f
ProjectAren pi'
gr-.—,7i
7f,
R1Mn dr Coulry7
Ohnse C6.0"y
99
'71.
%
0 10
20
--r.L
Diego
ILES
A-
L S A
FIGURE I
$
0 1,000 2.000 Barton Plaza
Commercial Center
FEET InitialStud
SOURCE USGS 7.5'Quads:San Bc`r3TdinO South 0980),CA:Thomas Bros.,2007 Regional and Project Location
1:CGTO802lReporrregional Imation.md I I 1.67,rwi
21
RE TA NT
lS,J SF
BRITTON WAY
e
FRESH & EASY
BUILDING 13,9610S.F.
W
MI
'Z
W
Q ,
Z
0
�Zy
W
C�C
G
WALGREENS
14,e20 SF J
n
f y
W
BARTON ROAD
L S A FIGURE 2
Barton Plaza
0 25 so 75 Commercial Center
Initial Study
FEET
SOLRCE:Counry of San Bernardino i10081;Collins& 1;soclaies Engineenng,Inc Conceptual Site Plan
I:CGT0.802'RcnwrSae Plan—d(I I,07:nGl
22
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
❑ Land Use and Planning ❑Transportation/Circulation
❑ Population and Housing ❑Biological Resources ❑Public Services
❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Geological Problems
❑Aesthetics ❑Recreation
❑ Water ❑Utilities and Services systems El Hazards
❑
Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑Air Quality
❑Noise
Determination:
On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency):
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the enviromnent,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
■ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on
an attached sheet have been added to the project. -A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
ENVIRONMENTAL"ACT REPORT is required. and an
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at
least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal
standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets,if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or'potentially
significant unless mitigated."An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier E1R,including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
igna re Date
Joyce Powers Community and Economic Development Director
Printed Name Title
Batton Plaza 6 butial Study and Envrrronmental.Nnalvsis
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one
involved(e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer.should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.,
the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-
site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potential Significant Impact" to a "Less
than Significant Impact."The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from
Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the
checklist.
6) - Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a
previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate, include a reference to
the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.A source list should be attached and
other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
Barton Plaza 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potential) Significant
Y Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact I. Land Use and Planning.Would the proposal: of Mitt anon Impact impact
a) Conflict with general clan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the ❑ ❑ ❑
project?
i c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ❑ ❑
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g.,
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from ❑ ❑ ❑
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community(including a low-income or ❑ ❑ ❑
minority community)?
a) Conflict with giener d elan designation or zoning?
The project site is designated as "General Commercial" and"Office Commercial' in the City of
Grand Terrace General Plan. Properties classified with the "General Commercial' land use
designation provides for general commercial uses to serve the retail and service needs of the
community.' Properties classified with the "Office Commercial' land use designation are used a
buffer between residential areas and general commercial areas. Permitted uses may include
office/administrative uses and support retail and service commercial uses. Under the current
designation,the proposed project would be partially consistent as it would result in the development
of commercial uses on the portion of the site located to the south of Britton Way.The portion of the
project located to the north of Britton Way is planned for a restaurant.While this use is not explicitly
listed in the General Plan as an appropriate use, this type of use does fit as a buffer between the
proposed commercial uses and the residential uses to the northwest of the project site and would be
considered a support service for the proposed project.Therefore,impacts related to conflicts with the
General Plan would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
The proposed project site is zoned"BSRP-Village Commercial'and"Administrative Professional'
(AP). The BSRP-Village Commercial zoning designation is intended to allow for varied types of
commercial development such as cafes, bakeries, gift shops, florist shops, bookstores, and other
similar commercial retail uses of a scale and quality that are compatible with a pedestrian-oriented
village atmosphere.The AP zoning designation is intended for banks,offices, medical clinics,and
similar uses.Conditional uses within the AP zone include uses that are included as a part of the"C2"
zoning category and similar to other conditionally permitted uses.Restaurants are an included use in
the C2 zoning category and are reasonable similar to retail uses; therefore, with the approval of a
conditional use permit, the proposed restaurant use that is proposed for the AP zoned no he rn
portion of the project would be consistent. Impacts associated zoning conflicts are considered less
than significant. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Table 2.4 ON of Grand Terrace General Plan Land Uve Desrgnaiun,Draft City ofGrand Terrace General Plan,City of Grand Terrace.January
2008.
Barton Plaza S Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
']C
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with
jurisdiction over the project?
CEQA Guidelines(§15022)states that each public agency adopt"...objectives,criteria,and specific
procedures consistent with CEQA ... for administering its responsibilities under CEQA,including
the orderly evaluation of projects and preparation of environmental documents."As set forth in this
Initial Study, consistent with CEQA, the proposed project has been evaluated using the
environmental procedures and policies established by the City of Grand Terrace. Furthermore,the -
preparation of the Initial Study—including the content and detail of environmental analysis,public
notification, scoping, distribution, and response to public comments—follows procedures
established by the City to implement CEQA. The City, exercising the authority granted under
CEQA, has identified mitigation to reduce the significance of impacts that would result from the
development and occupation of the proposed project.Because the proposed project has adhered to
the City's policies regarding the identification and mitigation of environmental impacts,no impact
related to this issue would occur. In the absence of a significant impact,no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
Existing land uses surrounding the project site include commercial and multiple-family residential
uses to the west,commercial uses to the south,and commercial and single-family residential uses to
the east.-Land uses to the north of the project include vacant land and a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences beyond the vacant area. The proposed project would result in the
demolition of 11,700 square feet of existing commercial uses and the development of 35,000 new
square feet of commercial uses. In total, the uses in the commercial center will measure
approximately 42,250 square feet including the existing 6,900-square foot building to be retained
and 1,250 square feet of outdoor seating.Development of the project site with commercial uses has
been identified and planned for in this area of the City. In addition, the majority of the project site
has previously been developed with commercial land uses. Because the proposed project is
consistent with uses permitted in the area, no significant impact would occur. No mitigation is
required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts
from incompatible land uses)?
The majority of the project site is developed with commercial uses and the site is not currently
utilized for agricultural production or grazing operation.Because the construction and occupancy of
the proposed commercial uses would not result in the conversion of agricultural land to non-
agricultural uses, no impact related to this issue would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
71
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-
income or minority community)?
The majority of the project site is currently developed with commercial uses and is bounded by
existing commercial and residential areas and roadways. The proposed on-site uses are consistent
with the site's existing zoning and General Plan designation. The proposed project would remove
11,700 square feet of the existing commercial development and develop 35,000 square feet of
commercial uses in its place and on an adjacent parcel. The proposed commercial uses would not
divide the physical arrangement of an established community; therefore,no impact related to this
issue would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Less than
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentials Significant
y Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact II.Population and Housing.Would the proposal: of Mitigation Impact Impact
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑
indirectly(e.g., through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑
housing?
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections?
The proposed project consists of the demolition of existing buildings, retention of a 6,900-square
foot building,and construction of about 35,000 square feet of new commercial and restaurant uses.
These uses would not create additional housing opportunities or create additional population.
Therefore,the proposed project would not have an impact in relation to this issue and no mitigation
is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g.,through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)?
The project site is located within an existing suburban area. The area surrounding the site is
currently developed with similar uses and the existing on-site development is served with all
utilities.Therefore,it is anticipated that gas,electricity,water,and wastewater lines are located in an
immediately accessible area within existing adjacent roadways and within the project site. Because
the proposed project would be constructed in an area currently fully serviced by roadway and utility
Barton Plaza 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
27
infrastructure, the project would not induce, either directly or indirectly, growth not previously
anticipated by the City or local utility providers. No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
As no residential use is currently located within the project limits, development of the proposed
project would not displace existing housing. No impact related to-this issue would occur and no
mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Less than
Significant
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of mitigation Impact Impact
III. Geologic Problems.Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ❑ ❑ ❑
b) Seismic ground shaking? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ Q
d) Seiches, tsunami,or volcanic hazard? ❑. ❑ ❑
e) Landslides or mudflows? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ❑ ❑ ❑
conditions from excavation,grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soil? ❑ � ❑ ❑
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
a) Fault rupture?
The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (A-P Act) mitigates fault rupture hazards'by
prohibiting the location of structures for human occupancy across the trace of an active fault. The
boundary of an"Earthquake Fault Zone"is generally 500 feet from major active faults and from 200
to 300 feet from well defined minor faults.The mapping of active faults is distributed to all affected
cities, counties, and state agencies for their use in developing planning policies and controlling
renovation or new construction. Per the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation completed for the
proposed project, the nearest significant active fault to the project site is the San Bernardino-San
Jacinto Fault Zone which is approximately 1.86 miles(9,843 feet)away. No active fault traverses
the project site,nor is the site located within an earthquake fault zone.1 In the absence of an on-site
active fault, no on-site fault rupture hazard impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
(Jeolerhmcal Engineering lmesnganon.Proposed Read Development.Barton Road and S11.Vernon 4renue.Grand Terrace.Cali/urnia,Salem
Engmeenng Group,May 30.2008.
Barton Plaza l l Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
2E
b) Seismic ground shaking?
As previously stated, no active fault traverses the project site, nor is the site located within an
earthquake fault zone.However,the project is located in an area of high regional seismicity and the
development of the project within a seismically active region may increase the potential for property
loss, injury, or death resulting from ground shaking. The closest fault to the project site is the San
Jacinto-San Bernardino Fault approximately 1,.86 miles (9,843 feet) northeast of the site.' Other
earthquake faults in the area include the San Andreas-Southern Fault, which is located
approximately 10.6 miles northeast of the project site. Based on the proximity of the earthquake
faults to the project site,the largest estimated mean peak horizontal ground acceleration for the site
is 0.82g along the San Jacinto-San Bernardino Fault. However,the City of Grand Terrace maintains
construction standards based on the California Building Code—California Code of Regulations,
Title 24 (CBC). These established engineering standards are appropriate for the seismic zone in
which development may occur.Adherence to these standards and requirements set forth in the CBC
and by the City of Grand Terrace would reduce impacts related to this issue to a less than significant
level.
Mitigation Measure:
GEO-01 The design and construction of all structures and facilities within the project limits
shall be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the
City of Grand Terrace,applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Uniform
Building Code,and/or the site-specific geotechnical investigation prepared for the
Proposed project.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs when strong earthquake shaking causes soils to collapse
from a sudden loss of cohesion and undergo a transformation from a solid state to a liquefied state.
There are three basic factors that must exist concurrently in order for liquefaction to occur. These
factors include(1)a source of ground shaking,such as an earthquake; (2)loose silty and/or sandy
soil; and (3) a relatively shallow groundwater table (within approximately 50 feet below ground
surface). The soils encountered on site within the depth of 50 feet on the project site consisted of
silty sand and sandy silt. Groundwater was not encountered during the subsurface exploration that
was done as a part of the preparation of the Geotechnical Investigation. The liquefaction analysis
indicated that the site soils had a low potential for liquefaction under seismic conditions. Therefore
no mitigation would be required.
Finding: Less than Significant.No mitigation is required.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Barton Plaza 12 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
29
d) Seiches, tsunami,or volcanic hazard?
A seiche is a wave or oscillation of the surface of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin that
continues from a few minutes to a few hours as a result of seismic or atmospheric disturbances. No
open or enclosed bodies of water are located in the vicinity of the project site;therefore,no seiche-
related impact would affect the project site. Because the project site is located approximately 47
miles from the Pacific Ocean and because the project site is elevated more than 1,200 feet above
mean sea level,the project site would be unaffected by tsunamis or tidal events.No volcanic activity
has been historically documented in the project area; therefore, the project site would not be
impacted by volcanic hazards. Therefore, no impacts associated with this issue are anticipated to
occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation Is required.
e) Landslides or mudflows?
Topography on the project site from has a slight slope but is essentially flat.The project site is not
located within an area that is designated as being susceptible to landslide based on the General Plan.
Since the site is not located in an area that is designated by the City as being prone to landslides,no
impact in relation to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
f) Erosion,changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,grading, or
fill?
Development of the proposed project would require the movement of on-site soils. All on-site
grading activity would conform to City grading standards, which is a requirement of any
development in the City. Adherence to standard City grading requirements would ensure no
significant grading-related impact would occur during project development.The project site would
disturb an area more than one acre and would therefore be required to obtain a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The preparation of a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan(SWPPP)is required for all projects that would disturb 1 acre or more. To address
erosion and discharge impact associated with the proposed on-site grading the BMPs included in the
SWPPP would be implemented to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. No additional
mitigation is required.
Mitigation Measure:
Please refer to the mitigation measure identified for III(b).
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
Barton Plaza 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,
3C
g) Subsidence of the land?
Subsidence is the sudden sinking or gradual downward settling of the earth's surface with little or no
horizontal motion that may result from any number of human activities(e.g.,subterranean mining,
groundwater withdrawal, or oil drilling) or natural phenomena (e.g., dissolution in limestone
aquifers, hydrocompaction, liquefaction; or crustal deformation). Fill soils are anticipated to be
present on site since the site was previously graded for the current development. Adherence to
recommendations contained in the geotechnical investigation conducted for the proposed project,
which have been incorporated as Mitigation Measure GEO-01,would reduce impacts associated
with this issue to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measure:
Please refer to the mitigation measure identified for III(b).
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
h) Expansive soil?
Expansive soils are those with a significant amount of clay particles that have the ability to give up
water (shrink) or take on water (swell). When these soils swell, the change in volume exerts
significant pressures on loads (such as buildings) that are placed on them. Two types of soil are
present on the project site: Greenfield Sandy Loam,2-9 percent(GtQ and Ramona Sandy Loam
(RmQ.1 The design and construction of all structures and facilities within the project limits would
be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the City of Grand
Terrace and the applicable and appropriate measures identified in the project-specific geotechnical
study and/or the Uniform Building Code. Adherence to these measures would ensure a less than
significant impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
Most of the project area has been previously developed. The undeveloped.portion of the site is a
vacant field with no significant slope or other geologic features. Therefore, no impact associated
with this issue would occur.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
SSLRGOiSod Data Mart.
Barton Plaza 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
31
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
IV.Water.Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
rate and amount of surface runoff?'
b) Expose to people or property to water-related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ r���
such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
surface water quality(e.g.,temperature,dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
body?
e) Changes in currents or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
movements?
f) Changes in the quality of groundwater, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,or through interception ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations,or through
substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ■ L2 .
otherwise available for public water supplies?
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runom.
The installation of impermeable surfaces within the project limits would incrementally reduce the
amount of land available for groundwater recharge.However,while the project site encompasses a
total of less than 4 acres, the majority of the site would be devoted to building pads,parking area,
driveways, and landscaping. In the developed condition, the site would be designed to match the
drainage patterns of the existing condition.
Under existing conditions,a portion of off-sire runoff from Mount Vernon Avenue flows to Britton
Way,while runoff from the vacant land north of the site flows south onto the project site. Flows
from the north combine with flows on the northern portion of the project site and continue in a
southwesterly manner until reaching Britton Way. Runoff from the westernmost 1.85 acres of the
site and northeastern 0.38 acres of the site flow northwesterly to Britton Way. Flows are then
intercepted by a catch basin at the southeast comer of Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue,then
piped and discharged into Britton Way via a curb outlet.The southeastern 0.54 acre of the site flow
easterly to Mount Vernon Avenue.
The proposed project would result in the demolition of four of the five existing buildings located on
the site. To adjust for the grade differences in the site,retaining walls would be constructed on the
north and west property lines. A proposed V-ditch along the northern property line would intercept
and convey off-site flows from the north to Britton Way. All on-site runoff would drain to a
proposed underground infiltration system for water quality treatment. As identified in the
Barton Plaza 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
32
preliminary drainage report' and Table A, the amount of runoff coming from the project site is
expected to increase slightly from pre-development conditions with the development of the proposed
project.
Table A: Summary of Runoff Flows
Condition Flows(cubic foot/sec)
Existing Scenario 10-year 100-year
9.17 cfs
12.7 cfs
Proposed Scenario 9.45 cfs
13.06 cfs
Source:Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.,May 2009
The increase in runoff generated by the proposed project would be treated by on-site infiltration
features. All development in the City is required to design post-development features that would
ensure post-development flows leaving the project site are not greater than pre-development runoff
flow rates.Although the proposed project would result in an increase in impervious surfaces,post-
development flows would be attenuated by the underground treatment basins to ensure,that flows
leaving the site would be no greater than what currently exists.Therefore, impacts associated with
this issue would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Expose to people or property to water-related hazards such as flooding?
Flooding in the City of Grand Terrace would typically result from intense storms resulting in rapid
1 runoff;The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRMS)
identify areas subject to flooding during the 100-year storm2 and 500-year storm event. Based on
these FIRMs,the project site is not located within the 100-year or 500-year floodplain.3 Because the
project site is not located within a floodplain, the proposed project would,not impede or redirect
flood flows or expose people or property to water-related hazards such as flooding. Therefore,no
impacts associated with this issue are anticipated to occur.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality(e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
Construction of the proposed development would require grading and excavation activities,which
may allow eroded soils.and other pollutants to enter the storm drain system. Any construction
project resulting in the disturbance of 1.0 acre or more requires an NPDES permit; therefore, the
project would be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Common Best Management Practices
(BMPs) for the project site would be implemented as required to comply with the NPDES permit
such as soil bags, silt fences,jute mats, and hydroseeding. The use of these BMPs would prevent
erosion from occurring and construction-related sediment from entering nearby waterways.
Preliminary Drainage Repori Jor Grand Terrace Commercial Plaza.Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.,May 2oog.
The term"100-year"is a measure of the size of the flood,not how often it occurs.The"I00-year flooei"is a flooding event that has a one percent
chance of occumng in any given year.
FEM4 Flood Zone Panel 06071C8687F,FEMA Q3 Data. 1996.
Barton Plaza 16 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
33
Implementation of these BMPs would reduce the potential for alteration of water quality during the
construction phase of the proposed project. Because the proposed project is required to adhere to
NPDES permit requirements, which include the preparation of a SWPPP and the installation of
construction BMPs, a less than significant impact would occur and no,mitigation is required.
During the operational phase of the proposed project, the project would utilize BMPs identified in
the site-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These BMPs include maximizing
pervious surfaces within the project site by providing landscaped areas with infiltration features
within the project and by providing an underground infiltration basin that would slow the flow of
water though the site and provide treatment by allowing the percolation of water. Through
implementation of the identified BMPs in the WQMP,runoff from the project site would be reduced
and flows would be treated before leaving the site and thereby maintaining existing water quality.
Because the preparation of a WQMP and the use of post-development BMPs are required as part of
development requirements,impacts associated with water quality during the operational phase of the
project would be reduced to a less than significant level. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?
As identified in the WQMP prepared for the proposed project ' surface flows from the commercial
and restaurant uses would be treated through the use of an underground infiltration basin and
landscaped areas. Flows coming through the project would be conveyed westerly toward Britton
Way. Flows would then be conveyed via the existing curb and gutter as well as the existing City
storm drain system, to the Santa Ana River. Due to the limited size of the project site and the
retention of on-site permeable areas and the implementation of the on site underground infiltration
basin,a significant increase in the volume of flows draining from the project site is not anticipated;
therefore,no significant change in the volume of surface waters would occur.As stated in response
IV(a), post construction runoff from the project site must not exceed the amount of runoff that
currently comes from the site in its existing condition. As a standard condition required of all
development in the City,on-site and off-site drainage features would be installed and/or improved to
accommodate anticipated flows from the project site.Adherence to the standard City requirements
would ensure no significant impact related to this issue'would occur. No additional mitigation is
required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
e) Changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements?
Because no streams,rivers,or bodies of water are located within the project limits,development of
the proposed project would not directly alter the course or direction of water. While drainage from
the project site would continue to flow in a westerly direction through existing facilities and,
ultimately to the Santa Ana River and because of the limited size of the project site, the volume of
runoff from the site, is not anticipated to significantly alter the course or direction of water
Grand Terrace C'ommmial Center Burton Road and All. Vernon avenue Water quultly Management Plan/WQMP/,Collins&Associates
Engineering.Inc.,.NIay I,2008.
Barton Plaza 17 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
movements in the Santa Ana River. Therefore, a less than significant impact related to this issue
would result from development of the proposed project and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
f) Changes in the quality of groundwater, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
The project site would be provided water service through an existing distribution system owned and
operated by the Riverside Highland Water Company(RHWC); therefore,no direct withdrawals of
groundwater would occur within the project limits. Since the local groundwater table within the
project limits is in excess of 50 feet as stated in the geotechnical study for the proposed project,
grading activities and construction operations would not result in the interception of an aquifer as no
construction process would require excavation greater than SO.feet.The project site is not identified
by the City as an area set aside for groundwater recharge. Because the proposed project does not
contain a component that would result in the direct withdrawal of groundwater,impacts associated
with this issue are considered to be less than significant.No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
O As previously identified, the groundwater level at the project site is in excess of 50 feet. The
proposed.project would not excavate deeper than 50 feet.Therefore,implementation of the proposed
project would not alter the direction,rate of flow,or quality of groundwater.No impacts associated
with this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
Please refer to the response to Checklist Question IV(g).
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
The proposed project does not trigger the requirement for preparation of a water supply assessment
(e.g.,a residential project with 500 or more dwelling units)as established in Sections 10910-10912
of the California Water Code.Based on a water consumption factor of 0.146 acre-feet per employee
per year, the proposed project would require 40.15 acre-feet per year or 35,844 gallons of water per
Barton Plaza 18 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
day.' The project is anticipated to be supplied with domestic water from the RHWC. Prior to the
issuance of building permits,the project applicant would be required to satisfy RHWC requirements
related to the payment of fees and/or the provision of adequate water facilities,including necessary
fire-flow requirements. Adherence to the standard and site-specific conditions required by the
RHWC would reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less than significant level.No
mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
V.Air Quality.Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c) Alter air movement,moisture,or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
any change in climate?(Any such implementing
actions are designed to have a positive effect on the
region's air quality.)
d Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation?
The current regional air quality plan is the 2007 Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP)adopted by
the SCAQMD on June 1,2007.The 2007 AQMP employs the most up-to-date science and analytical
tools and incorporates a comprehensive strategy aimed at controlling pollution from all sources,
including stationary sources, on-road and off-road mobile sources and area sources. The 2007
AQMP also updates the attainment demonstration for the standards for ozone and PMIo, and
proposes attainment demonstration with a more focused control of sulfur oxides,directly-emitted
PM2.5,nitrogen oxides,and volatile organic compounds by 2015.The South Coast Air Basin(Basin)
is currently a federal and state non-attainment area for PMIo and ozone.
Short-Term Impacts
Development of the project would involve demolition and minor grading activities that may generate
dust. Four criteria were evaluated to determine whether the proposed project could create a
potentially significant air quality impact. Impacts were considered significant if they:
• Caused ambient air quality standards to be exceeded where standards are currently met;
• Contributed to a measurable increase in pollution levels where standards are already exceeded;
0 146 acre-feet per employee per year R 275 employees=40.15 acre-feet per year/365 days per year=0 11 acre-foot per employee per day;0.11
acre-foot R 325,851 gallonsll acre-foot=35,844 gallons per day
Barton Plaza 19 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
'�F
• Exposed the public to air pollutants that are known to be toxic, carcinogenic, or otherwise
harmful at levels suspected to be unhealthful even if no ambient standards exist for such
contaminants; and/or
• Created dusts, fumes, mists, odors, or other airborne emissions that may constitute a nuisance
under the Health and Safety Code of the State of California.
Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with demolition, land clearing,exposure of soils,
and cut and fill operations. Dust generated daily during construction would vary substantially,
depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions. Additionally,
particulate matter would be emitted in equipment exhaust from heavy off-road equipment use.
Grading and other construction activities would result in combustion emissions from heavy-du
ty
construction vehicles,haul trucks,utility engines,and vehicles transporting the construction crew.
Exhaust emissions during these construction activities would vary daily as construction activity
levels change. Peak grading days typically generate a larger amount of air pollutants than during
other project construction days. It is assumed that overlap would occur during the underground
utility construction, paving, and building construction phases of project construction. The
underground utility construction phase includes general trench work,pipe-laying with associated
base material and cover;ancillary earthwork,and construction_of manholes.It is assumed that this
activity would take place concurrent with building construction and paving activities. Paving
activities include the movement of any remaining material as well as necessary curb and gutter
work, road base material placement, and blacktop. Using emission factors from the CARE
EMFAC2007 model, Table B indicates that construction equipment/vehicle emissions during
proposed on-site grading periods would not exceed the SCAQMD daily construction thresholds.
Table B: Summary of Construction Emissions
Project Construction POLLUTANTS(1bs/day)
CO ROC
Demolition NOX SO= PMu PMu
6.8 1.5 11 0.0032 2.2
Mass Grading 1.0
15 3.4 28 0.0013 6.3
Fine Grading 2.3
15 3.4 28 0.0013
Trenching 9.7 2.4 .6.3 2_3
Paving 9 5 2 5 20 0.0013 1.0 0.92
Building 8 7 1 5 14 0.0029 1.2 1.1
11 0.0042 0.72 0.65
Coating 0 18 14
0.011 0.0002 0.0015 0.0008
SCAQMD Threshold 550 75 100
Significant? I50 150 55
NO NO NO NO NO Source.LSA Associates,Inc.october 2008 NO
While the proposed project would not exceed any of the SCAQMD construction emissions
thresholds,the proposed project would be required to comply with standard regional rules that assist
in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions(e.g.,SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403).The purpose of
SDAQMD Rule 403 is to reduce the amount of particulate matter in the atmosphere resulting from
man-made fugitive dust sources. Among the requirements under this rule, fugitive dust must be
controlled so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the
property line of the emission source. This is achieved by requiring actions to prevent, reduce, or
mitigate dust emissions. Adherence to Rule 403 is a standard requirement for any development
Barton Plaza ,0
Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
37
project occurring within the SCAQMD.Applicable fugitive dust control measures identified in Rule
403 include:
• Apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all
inactive construction areas(previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).
• Water active sites at least twice daily. Locations where grading is to occur would be thoroughly
watered prior to earthmoving.
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt,sand,soil,or other loose materials,or maintain at least two feet of
freeboard(vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer)in accordance with
the requirements of California Vehicle Code(CVC)Section 23114.
• Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road.
• Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less.
Because the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD construction emissions standards, air
quality impacts associated with the construction phase of the proposed project would be less than
significant. Therefore,no mitigation is required.
Long-Term Impacts
Long-term air impacts may result from the use of motor vehicles by residents and the on-site energy
usage. Based on Traffic Study, the proposed project would generate 1,076 vehicle trips per day.
Seventy-three trips would be generated during the morning peak hour and one-hundred and eight
trips would be generated during the evening peak hour. In accordance with SCAQMD and the
California Air Resources Board(CARB)directives for review of air quality impacts from land use
projects,the analysis assesses the mobile source emissions generated by vehicles driving to and from r
the proposed land uses,as well as area source emissions generated by project heating and electrical
systems. Based on the nature of the proposed on-site uses and project related traffic, operational
emissions resulting from the proposed project would be as identified below in Table C.
Table C: Summary of Operational Emissions
Pollutants(lbs/day)
Operational Emissions CO ROC NO. SOx PM,O PMu
Existing Land Uses
Stationary sources 1.8 0.25 0.2 0 0 0
Mobile sources 170 15 23 0.16 27 5.2
Existing Land Uses Subtotal 172 15 23 0.16 27 5.2
Proposed Land Uses
Stationary sources 6.7 0.78 0.4 0 0.02 0.02
Mobile sources 270 24 38 0.26 43 8.5
Proposed Land Uses Subtotal 277 25 38 0.26 43 8.5
Net Increase Due to Project 110 10 15 0.1 16 3.3
SCAQMD Threshold 550 55 55 150 150 55
Significant? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source:LSA Associates,Inc.October 2008
As indicated in Table C, the operational phase of the proposed project would not result in the
generation of air pollutants that would be in excess of established SCAQMD thresholds.Because the
Barton Plaza 21 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
3z
Proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD operational emission standards,no significant impact
associated with this issue would occur. No mitigation would be required.
Greenhouse Gas Impacts
Global climate change refers to alterations in weather features that occur across the Earth as a whole,
including temperature,wind patterns,precipitation,and storms.Global temperatures are moderated
by naturally occurring atmospheric gases, including water vapor, carbon dioxide(CO2), methane
(CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). These gases allow solar radiation (sunlight) into the Earth's
atmosphere but prevent radiative heat from escaping,thus warming the Earth's atmosphere.Global
climate change attributable to anthropogenic (human) emissions of greenhouse gases (primarily
CO2,CH4,and N2O)is currently one of the most important and widely debated scientific,economic,
and political issues in the United States.
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as greenhouse gases, analogous to a
greenhouse effect.Greenhouse gases are emitted by both natural processes and human activities.The
accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere regulates the Ear h's tempera e. Without
tur these natural greenhouse gases, the Earth's temperature would be about 61 degrees Fahrenheit
cooler. Emissions from human activities, such as vehicle,natural gas,electricity usage,and water
usage have elevated the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere.
Greenhouse gases have varying global warming potential(GWP).GWP is a measure ofhow much a
given mass of greenhouse gas is estimated to contribute to global warming.It is a relative scale that
compares the gas in question(e.g.,N2O and CH4)to that of the same mass of carbon dioxide.CO2 is
considered to be a reference gas with a GWP of 1 and is the baseline unit with which all other
greenhouse gases are compared. The other main greenhouse gases that have been attributed to
human activity—methane and nitrous oxides—have GWPs of 21 and 310 tera
dioxide equivalent(Tg CO2 Eq.),respectively. � 1 of carbon
An analysis of data compiled by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC), indicates that in 2005, total GHG emissions were 22,374 Tg CO2 Eq., excluding
emissions/removals from land use, land use change, and forestry. In 2005, the United States
contributed the most GHG emissions(32%of global emissions),totaling 7,241.4 Tg CO2 Eq.,which
is an increase of 16.3 percent from 1990 emissions.
2
California is a substantial contributor of global greenhouse gases as it is the second largest
contributor in the U.S.and the sixteenth largest in the world.;From 1990 to 2003,California's gross
state product grew 83 percent while GHG emissions grew 12 percent. While California has a high
amount of GHG emissions, it has low emissions per capita. In 2004, California produced 492 Tg
CO2 Eq.,which is approximately 7 percent of U.S.emissions.The major source of GHG emissions
in California is transportation, contributing 41 percent of th e state's total GHG emissions
.4
Electricity generation is the second largest generator, contributing 22 percent of the state's GHG
1 One teragram is equal to one million metric tons,
2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data,Predefined Queries,.4nner/Parties-GHG total without L UL L'CF(land ure,land-use change,andjoresnv),
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,http:/,unfccc.intighg_emissions data/predefined queriesritemv3841.php,2007,web
sne accessed January 21,2008.
3 inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004. Staff Final Report, CEC-b00-2006-013-
SF,http:/,'www.energy.ca.govi2006publicanons/CEC-600-2006-013,CEC-600-2006-013-SF.PDF, pg.17, California Energy Commission
December 2006.
4 Inventory Of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:/990 to 2004.Sta/fFinal Report.CEC-600 2006-013-SF,pg.ii,California Energy
Commission,December 2006.
Barton Plaza 22
Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
�A
emissions. Emissions from fuel use in the commercial and residential sectors in California decreased
9.7 percent over the 1990-2004 period.' The decrease in greenhouse gases could demonstrate the
effectiveness of energy conservation in buildings (Title 24 requirements) and appliances. The
decrease in greenhouse gases attributed to these sources is even more substantial when the
population increase in California is considered.
According to the 2006 California Climate Action Team Report,2 the following climate change
effects, which are based on trends established by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change(IPCC), can be expected in California over the course of the next century:
• A diminishing
Sierra sno wpack declining by 70 percent to 90 percent, threatening the state's
water supply;
• Increasing temperatures from 8 to 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit under the higher emission scenarios,
leading to a 25 percent to 35 percent increase in the number of days ozone pollution levels are
exceeded in most urban areas;
• Increased vulnerability of forests due to forest fires,pest infestation,and increased temperatures;
• Increased electricity demand,particularly in the hot summer months;and
• Increased ground-level ozone formation due to higher reaction rates of ozone precursors.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced on June 1,2005,through Executive Order
S-3-05 (Climate Change) GHG emission reduction targets as follows: by 2010, reduce GHG
emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; by 2050, reduce GHG
emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels(CA 2005).Some literature equates these reductions to 11
percent by 2010 and 25 percent by 2020. In September 2006, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger -
signed AB 32,the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 directs the CARB to
implement regulations for a cap on sources or categories of sources of GHG emissions. The bill
requires that the CARB develop regulations to reduce emissions with an enforcement mechanism to
ensure that the reductions are achieved, and to disclose how it arrives at the cap. It also includes
conditions to ensure businesses and consumers are not unfairly affected by reductions. AB 32
requires the CARE to:
• Adopt a list of discrete early action measures by July 1,2007, that can be implemented before
January 1, 2010;
• Establish a statewide GHG emissions cap for 2020 based on 1990 emissions and adopt
mandatory reporting rules for significant sources of GHG by January 1,2008;
• Indicate how emission reductions will be achieved from significant GHG sources via
regulations, market mechanisms,and other actions by January 1, 2009; and
• Adopt regulations by January 1, 2011, to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and
cost-effective reductions in GHG, including provisions for using both market mechanisms and
alternative compliance mechanisms.
AB 32 codifies S-3-05's year 2020 goal by requiring that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to
1990 levels by the year 2020.This reduction will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide
lnventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sink - 1990 to 2004 .Sm%f Final Report,CEC-600-2006-013-SF,pg.10,California
Energy Commission.December 2(H)6.
California Environmental Protection Agency,Climate Iction Team Report to Guvernur Sthwar_enegger anJthe Leg1sluture,March 2006.
Barton Plaza 23 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
Ar
cap on GHG emissions that will be implemented no later than January 1, 2012. To effectively
implement the cap, AB 32 directs the CARB to develop appropriate regulations and establish a
mandatory reporting system to track and monitor global warming emissions levels.
The estimated volume of greenhouse gas generated by new uses associated with the proposed project is
identified in Table D.
Table D: Summary of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greenhouse Gas Emissions(annual)
Emission Source
Vehicles 400'0 O flo N:O CO=e
0.15 1,400
Electricity Production 240 0.0027
0.0015 240
Natural Gas Production 18 0.00034
0.00033 '1 g
Solid Waste Na n/a
n/a 54
Total Annual Emissions 1,700 ::±=o IV
O.15 1,700
Source:LSA Associates,Inc.November 2008
Note:Number in table may not appear to add up due to rounding of all numbers to two significant digits.
The proposed project would generate approximately 1,700 metric tons(0.0016 Tg)of greenhouse
gases per year,amounting to 0.00033 percent of the state's 2004 greenhouse gas emissions.
There is no current threshold established for impacts resulting from the generation of greenhouse
gases. The California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team developed a report
that, "...proposes a path to achieve the Governor's targets that will build on voluntary actions of
California businesses,local government and community actions,and State incentive and regulatory
programs."The report indicates that the strategies will reduce California's overall emission levels.These actions include measures, design features, and operational procedures that aim to reduce
energy consumption,reduce the generation of waste,encourage recycling of resources,and reduce
water usage. Features incorporated into the proposed project that mirror the voluntary actions
suggested by the Climate Action Team include:
• Skylights on Fresh&Easy buildings with overhead lighting that dims automatically as ambient
light levels increase from natural sources.
• Increased insulation, reducing the need for heating and air conditioning.
• Night shades on refrigeration cases to keep cool air from escaping.
• Hybrid parking spaces and bike racks for employees and customers.
• In-store recycling available for employees and customers.
• Secondary-loop system on refrigeration cases designed to capture and reuse cool air.
• LED lighting in external signage and freezer cases, reducing energy use.
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures.
• Buildings constructed from environmentally friendly materials.
• Low VOC emitting finishes and materials as part of creating indoor environmental quality for
customers and employees
Barton Plaza 1_4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
Al
• Fresh&Easy is a member of the California Climate Action Registry,California's only voluntary
registry for greenhouse gas emissions, and the Climate registry, a group that standardized the
measurement for greenhouse gas emissions across North America. www.climateregistry.org
• Every Fresh& Easy store recycles all of its display and shipping materials.
• Out of respect for the indoor environment, Fresh & Easy uses only eco-friendly cleaning
products,while keeping their stores immaculately clean and tidy.
• Sites that promotes community connectivity and are near residential development and basic
community services to promote walking and biking to reduce vehicular usage.
• Maximize water efficiency within the building to reduce the burden on municipal water supply
and wastewater systems.
• Design the building envelope, HVAC, lighting, and other systems to maximize energy
performance that will comply with both California codes and LEED requirements to obtain
LEED credits.
Comparatively speaking, the proposed project would generate an incrementally small amount of
greenhouse gases.The preceding discussion identifies project-related greenhouse gas emissions as
well as various design and operational measures to reduce GHG gases to the extent possible.
Although implementation of the above-stated measures may reduce the emission of greenhouse
gases attributable to the project through emission reductions, recycling programs, increases in
building and appliance energy efficiencies,and decreased water use,it is not possible to specifically
quantify the reduction in greenhouse gases that will result from implementation of the strategies and
programs- described above. However, the project is consistent with the strategies to reduce
California's emissions to the levels proposed by Executive Order S-3-05. Therefore,the project's
incremental contribution to climate change impacts is less than significant.No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
b) Expose sensitive receptors-to pollutants?
Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution
than the population at large.The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors:long-term
health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, schools,
playgrounds,child care centers,and athletic facilities. During construction, fugitive dust would be
generated during on-site grading. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are the existing
residences adjacent to the project site on the west and approximately 80 feet to the east of the project
site,a child care center approximately 125 feet west of the project site,and a nursing rehabilitation
center. 130 feet to the north of the site. These uses would be exposed to fugitive dust generated on-
site during construction activities.The implementation of best available control measures established
through compliance with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 would ensure emissions of fugitive would
not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Because SCAQMD daily emission thresholds would not be
exceeded during the construction or operation of the proposed on-site uses,no significant impact to
adjacent sensitive receptors would occur. Therefore, no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 25 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
42
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate?(Any such
implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality.)
Although the project site is approximately 4 acres,the majority of the project is currently developed
with commercial uses.Approximately 11,700 square feet of the existing commercial area would be
removed, an existing 6,900-square foot building will remain, and new commercial and restaurant
uses will be constructed.In total,the commercial center will be comprised of approximately 42,250
square feet of commercial and restaurant uses including outdoor dining.The project would replace
the removed buildings with a similar type of development.No changes in the topography of the site
or the construction of the proposed on-site uses would significantly affect existing local air
movement patterns or climatic conditions as they currently exist within the project area;therefore,a
less than significant impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Create objectionable odors?
The proposed project would result in the development of commercial and restaurant uses. Odors
typically associated with the proposed uses include those associated with the preparation of food
products The control of such odors is typically achieved through,the sanitary,storage and disposal of
organic waste and the utilization of equipment and/or measures to contain and/or neutralize
objectionable odors.
. Temporary and/or short-term odor releases associated with construction activity(e.g.,glues,paint,
�1 asphalt) necessary to build and maintain the site may also occur. During construction, diesel-
powered vehicles and equipment in use on the site would create odors.Additionally,the application
of architectural coatings and installation of asphalt may generate odors. However, these odors are
temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries.SCAQMD Rules 1108 and
1113,which are required for all development,identify standards regarding the application of asphalt
and architectural coatings,respectively.Adherence to the standards identified in these rules would
reduce temporary odor impacts to a less than significant level and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 26 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
Al
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
. Impact of Miti ation Impact Impact
VI.Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ■
curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible
uses? ❑
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ❑ ■ ■ ■
d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? ❑ ❑ ■
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 ❑ ■
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑
transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ❑ ❑
g) Rail,waterborne,or air traffic impacts? ❑
a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
As identified in the traffic study,the proposed project is expected to generate a total net increase of
1,076 daily trips,with 73 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 108 trips occurring during
the p.m. peak hour.' As indicated in Table E, all of the project area intersections are currently
operating at a level of service (LOS) C or better. The City of Grand Terrace requires that all �^
intersections operate at LOS D or better. Therefore, any intersection operating at a LOS E or F -
would be considered deficient.All intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS in the
existing condition.
TableE: Existing Year(2008)Levels of Service
Level of Service(LOS)
Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Riverside Freeway(I-215)Southbound Ramps/Barton Road B C
I-215 Northbound Ramps/Barton Road A A
Michigan Avenue/Barton Road B B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Washington Street B B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Ten-ace Road C C
Mount Vernon Avenue/Britton Way B C
Mount Vernon Avenue/Barton Road C C
Mount Vernon AvenuerDe Berry Street C B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Van Buren Avenue B B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Main Street B B
Source:RK Engineering Group Inc..October 2009
Wotmt Vernon t venue and Barron Road G,mmerc tal Center Traffic Impact Studv. RK Engineering Group,Inc..October 28.-Nog.
Barton Plaza 27 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
46
The levels of service for the project area have been analyzed for the anticipated project opening year
(2009) with and without the project. Table F provides the levels of service for the project area
intersections in the opening year(2009).
Table F: Opening Year(2009)Levels of Service
Level of Serviw
Without Project
Intersection AM
PM
I-215 Southbound Ramps/Barton Road C F
I-215 Northbound Ramps/Barton Road B E B
`
Michigan Avenue/Barton Road E B D B D
Mount Vernon Avenue/Washington Street B B
B B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road i. P
E F
Mount Vernon Avenue/Britton Way C D
C E
Mount Vernon Avenue/Barton Road D C
D D
Mount Vernon Avenue/De Berry Street C B
C B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Van Buren Avenue D
E. D F
Mount Vernon Avenuc/Main Street F F
Project Access I/Barton Road F F
Future Intersection C D
Project Access 2/Barton Road Future Intersection
B B
Project Access 3/Mount Vernon Avenue Future Intersection
Source:RK Engineering Group Inc.,October 2009 C D
-T As indicated in the opening year(2009)without project condition,five intersections are forecast to
operate at unacceptable levels. These intersections are:
0 I-215 Southbound Ramps/Barton Road;
• I-215 Northbound Ramps/Barton Road;
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road;
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Van Buren Avenue; and
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Main Street.
As identified in the opening year(2009)with project condition, a total of six intersections would
operate at unacceptable levels. These intersections are:
• I-215 Southbound Ramps/Barton Road;
• I-215 Northbound Ramps/Barton Road;
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road;
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Van Buren Avenue;
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Main Street; and
• Mount Vernon Avenue/Britton Way.
Barton Plaza 28 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
A
It is important to note that five of these intersections in the opening year (2009) with project
conditions operate at unsatisfactory.levels of service in the opening year (2009) without project
scenario. Therefore, while the proposed project contributes to impacts at these intersections, the
project itself does not cause the deficiency at the intersections.However,since the proposed project
does contribute to existing deficiencies at these five intersections and would cause-one additional
intersections to operate at an unacceptable LOS,mitigation would be required to reduce impacts to a
less than significant,level. The implementation of the Mitigation Measures TRAINS-01 through
TRANS-04 would reduce traffic impacts, with the exception of the Britton Way/Mount Vernon
Avenue intersection, to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measure:
TRANS-01 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall participate in a
fair-share contribution, via the payment of development impact fees, for the
installation of a traffic signal at the study area intersections of
a. Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road;
b. Mount Vernon AvenueNan Buren Avenue;and
C. Mount Vernon Avenue/Main Street.
TRANS-02 Prior to the issuance of grading.permits,the project proponent shall participate in a
fair-share funding,via the payment of development impact fees,for construction of:
a. An additional southbound left-turn lane at the I-215 southbound ramps
intersection with Barton Road; and
b. An additional eastbound through lane at the Barton Road intersection with the
I-215 northbound ramps.
These improvements shall require widening the Barton Road bridge deck,of I-215 to
provide two through lanes in the eastbound direction between the I-215 southbound
and northbound ramps.
TRANS-03 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the project proponent shall participate in a
fair-share funding,via payment of development impact fees, for construction of:
a. An additional northbound left-turn lane and exclusive eastbound right-turn
lane at the Michigan Avenue/Barton Road intersection; and
b. A right-turn overlap phase for the eastbound right-turn movement shall be'
added to the signal operations at the Michigan Avenue/Barton Road
intersection.
TRANS-04 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the project proponent shall provide evidence
to the City that the following improvements have been included in construction
plans:
a. Construction left-turn pocket with storage for at least two vehicles south of
Britton Way; and
Barton Plaza 29 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
dF
b. Complete half-section improvements to Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton
Road adjacent to the project.
Table G identifies the levels of services experienced at the study intersections with and without
mitigation and associated roadway improvements.
Table G: Opening Year(2009)Levels of Service With Project With/Without Mitigation
Level of service(LOS)
With Project w/out With Project
Mitigation w/Midgation
Intersection AM PM
AM PM
I-215 Southbound Ramps/Barton Road C F C D
I-215 Northbound Ramps/Barton Road B E B B
Michigan Avenue/Barton Road B D B C
Mount Vernon Avenue/Washington Street B B B B
Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand Terrace Road E F A A
kProject
ernon Avenue/Britton Way C E C E
ernon Avenue/Barton Road D D C C
ernon Avenue/De Bevy Street C B C B
ernon AvenuelVan Buren Avenue p F A A
ernon Avenue/Main Street F F A A
ccess 1/Barton Road C D C D
ccess 2/Barton Road B B B B
ccess 3/Mount Vernon Avenue C D C D
Source:RK Engineering Group Inc.,October 2008
As identified in Table G, all study area intersections, with the exception of Britton Way/Mount
Vernon Avenue,would operate at a satisfactory level of service with implementation of Mitigation
Measures TRANS-01 through TRANS-04. The traffic study identifies that if a traffic signal is
installed at the Britton Way/Mount Vernon Avenue intersection,the intersection would operate at
LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
The City's LOS standards states as follows: "The maximum acceptable LOS for Master Plan of
Streets and Highway(MPSH)roads maintained by the City shall be LOS C.However,intersections
at freeway ramps may have a LOS D in peak travel hours.
The acronym"MPSH"refers to roadways that are shown on the City of Grand Terrace General Plan
Circulation Element.This policy does not apply to Britton Way which,as proposed,will function as
a driveway to the project.The deficit that is noted in the Traffic Study will only impact users of the
driveway, exiting the project site. It will not impact traffic on Mount Vernon Avenue, which is
designated a MPSH road.
Although the traffic signal at the Britton Way/Mount Vernon Avenue intersection would result in the
intersection operating at a satisfactory LOS, the intersection is located less than 400 feet from the
signalized intersection of Barton Road/Mount Vernon Avenue.The signalization of an intersection
(Britton Way/Mount Vernon Avenue) so close to an existing signalized intersection (Barton
Road/Mount Vernon Avenue) has the potential to impact existing traffic flow on Mount Vernon
Barton Plaza 30 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
A'7
Avenue.Therefore,the traffic study did not suggest the signalization of Britton Way/Mount Vernon
Avenue. The Mount Vemon/Britton Way intersection is still recommended for a cross street stop
sign only. The 2009 PM peak hour delay is calculated to average 45.5 seconds (LOS "E"). This
deficiency affects the users of the commercial center; therefore, the recommendation to sign the
intersection rather that signalize it, is acceptable to the City.
As previously stated, without the signalization of Britton Way/Mount Vernon Avenue, the
intersection would operate at an unsatisfactory LOS.As indicated in the traffic study,left turns from
Britton Way onto Mount Vernon Avenue are projected to operate at a LOS of E.However,left turns
onto Britton Way from Mount Vernon Avenue are anticipated to operate acceptably. The traffic ,
study identifies that with the construction of a left-turn pocket,vehicles on Mount Vernon Avenue
wanting to turn left onto Britton Way would not interfere with northbound traffic. The traffic
modeling program also did not account for the vehicle platooning effect of the nearby signal to the
south which creates gaps in the northbound traffic, facilitating left turns onto Mount Vernon
Avenue.Therefore,actual future operations at the Britton Way/Mount Vernon Avenue intersection
are expected to operate better than projected in the traffic analysis,and a less than significant impact
is expected.
Finding: Less than Significant with Implementation of Mitigation.
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses?
No new roadways are proposed as a part of the project.Access to the project would be from existing
roadways. Britton Way is currently a publicly maintained local street. As part of the proposed
project, Britton Way would become a private drive aisle through the proposed project site. An
existing residential development currently has access to Mount Vemon Avenue via Britton Way and
two additional routes that extend to Barton Road,one of which is similar to the proposed vacated
portion of Britton Way,through a commercial center.These residents would still be able to access
Mount Vernon via the vacated portion of Britton Way,in addition to Barton Road to the south and
Mount Vernon Avenue to the north via Canal Street. In addition,the County Fire Department has
reviewed the proposed plans to vacate Britton Way and currently have no objections to making
Britton Way a private drive aisle.
The project is located at a signalized intersection on the comer of two the City's major roadways.
The design of access points for the proposed project must provide adequate site distance and traffic
control measures. This provision is normally realized through proper signalization and signal
sequencing to facilitate roadway traffic flows.The design of all roadways and intersections within
the project site would incorporate design standards tailored specifically to site access requirements.
Due to the proximity of the proposed project driveways to the intersection,design features have been
recommended in the traffic study to reduce the hazards associated with the project access points.The
inclusion of:Mitigation Measure TRANS-05 would ensure that impacts related to this issue remain
less than significant.
TRANS-05 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the project proponent shall provide evidence
to the City that the following improvements and standards have been included in
construction plans:
Barton Plaza 31 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
a. Project Access 1Barton Road is restricted to right-in/right-out access and left
turn ingress;
b. Project Access 1/Barton Road allowance of a break in the median to allow
left turns into project site;
C. Project Access 2/Barton Road is restricted to right-in/right-out access;
d. Project Access 3/Mount Vernon Avenue is restricted to right-in/right-out
access;
e. A 50 foot left-turn pocket at Project Access I/Barton Road in a raised median
along Barton Road is constructed west of Project Access 1.
f. A left turn pocket for vehicles traveling north on Mount Vernon Avenue
south of the intersection with Britton Way. The left turn pocket shall be of
sufficient length to accommodate at least two vehicles (50 feet) and is
recommended to be back-to-back with the existing left-turn lane on Mount
Vernon Avenue/Barton Road.
g- Sight distance at all project access points should be reviewed with respect to
Caltrans and City of Grand Terrace sight distance standards at the time of
preparation of final grading, landscape, and street improvements;
h. Install stop signs,stop bars,and stop legends at all project access points;and
i. Internal traffic signing/striping should be implemented in conjunction with
detailed construction plans for the project.
Finding: Less than Significant with Implementation of Mitigation.
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
�✓ Please refer to Checklist Response IX(b).
Finding: Less than Significant with Implementation of Mitigation
d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site?
The proposed project would include the development of approximately 35,000 square feet of
commercial and restaurant uses.The City of Grand Terrace requires one space for every 225 square
feet of commercial space for commercial centers over 35,000 square feet. The The total square footage
of the new development proposed on site is approximately 35,000 square feet. Including the 6,900
square feet of commercial portion of the site that would remain,the total site would contain a total of
42,250 square feet of commercial and restaurant space.Based on these requirements,a minimum of
188 parking spaces would be required to be located on the project site. The Barton Road Specific
Plan provides for development incentives when lots are being consolidated. The developer is
requesting a reduction in the required number of parking spaces as a development incentive,and is
proposing to provide 161 parking spaces. It is anticipated that between the various uses that will
occupy the site,multiple tasks will occur in one trip.Therefore,no significant impact is expected to
occur.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Chapter 18.60-Off-Street Parking,City of Grand Terrace Zoning Code,2001,website accessed July 28.2008.
Barton Plaza 32 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
49
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
The project site would be accessed through Mount Vernon Avenue,Barton Road,and Britton Way
(private driveway). Walkways would be provided throughout the project and would incorporate
appropriate access features. Currently, sidewalks, and bike lanes are in place on Mount Vernon
Avenue and Barton Road. As designed, the vacated portion of Britton Way does not include a
sidewalk.In order to accommodate a sidewalk,the north potion of the project,including the vacated
Britton Way, may need to be redesigned. In the event that this portion of the project site is
redesigned, it is possible that there may be a reduction in the number of proposed parking spaces.
However,this number is expected to be insignificant and can be incorporated into the development
incentive proposed. Compliance with standard City design for these features would ensure a less
than significant impact related to this issue would occur.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
The Riverside Transit Agency(RTA)provides regional bus access to the City through its Line 25,
which travels from downtown Riverside, past various shopping and service providers, to Loma
Linda University Medical Center and the Veteran's Administration Hospital in the City of Loma
Linda. Along Washington Avenue(at Stater Bros.),riders are able to transfer to Omnitrans Route
19, which provides service to medical providers and shopping outlets in Redlands, Colton, and
Fontana.The nearest bus stop to the project site is part of RTA Line 25 and is located adjacent to the 1
project at the comer of Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road. The proposed project would
comply with all City development policies, standards, and programs pertaining to supporting
alternative modes of transportation.The project would be designed in a manner that does not impede
bicycle or other alternative transportation modes; bike racks are proposed for the project and are
included in the project site plans. Therefore, no impact related to this issue would occur and no
mitigation measures are required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
g) Rail,waterborne,or au traffic impacts?
At project completion,the proposed project would result in the development and operation of 42,250
square feet of commercial and restaurant space and does not include a rail or air travel component.
Additionally,the project site is not located near any rail or air facility.No impact related to this issue
would result from development of the proposed project and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 33 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
5(
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): significant
Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
VII. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
impacts to:
a) Endangered,threatened, or rare species or their> ❑ ❑ ■
habitats(including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals,and birds)?
b) Locally designated species(e.g., heritage trees)? ❑
c) Locally designated natural communities e. ❑ ❑ ■
( g•
forest or coastal habitat)? � oak El ❑ ■
d) Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh, riparian, and vernal ❑ ❑
Pool)? ❑ ■
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
LSA Associates,Inc.(LSA)conducted a biological resources assessment of the site which included
a site visit on October 13,2008,by LSA Biologist Sarah Barrera.Following analysis is based on this
Biological Resource Assessment.'
a) Endangered,threatened,or rare species or their habitats(including but not limited to plants,
fish, insects,animals, and birds)?
Y
The project site is highly disturbed due to development.Most of the site consists of office and retail
buildings and a paved parking lot.The portions of the site that have not been paved have previously
been cleared of vegetation and now contain only a sparse cover of weedy s ecies. Ruderal
vegetation identified in the project area includes Bermuda p
grass(Cynodon dactylon),brume(Bromus
sp.), wild oats (Avers fatua), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), Canadian horseweed (Conyza
canadensis), and California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera). No wildlife species were observed
using the project site during site reconnaissance. In addition, no burrows were observed in the
portion of the project site containing ruderal vegetation.Therefore,it is reasonable to conclude that
the project site is only used by species common to disturbed areas.No federal or state threatened or
endangered wildlife was observed and none is expected due to the lack of suitable habitat.Therefore,
no impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is necessary.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Locally designated species(e.g., heritage trees)?
The project site is not located within habitat established by the City for any locally designated plant
or animal species. The majority of the proposed project site has been developed and previously
disturbed. The site does contain landscaping surrounding the existing structures and the vacant
portion of the project north of Britton Way contains ornamental trees and ruderal vegetation. No
Biological Resources,lssessment for the Blount Vernon and Barton RoudCommercial Cen LSA Associates,Inc.,October 17,2008. ter,Litt of Grand Terrace.San Bernardino County,
Barton Plaza 34 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
51
heritage trees or locally designated species exist on site. As no locally designated natural
communities exist on site,no impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
c) Locally designated natural communities(e.g., oak forest or coastal habitat)?
Please refer to Checklist Response VII(a).
ram,
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh,,riparian,and vernal pool)?
The project site is currently a paved and developed site. Therefore, there are no drainage features
subject to jurisdiction by the California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG),U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers(ACOE),and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)within the project site.
No impact related to this issue would occur.No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Wildlife movement includes seasonal migration along corridors, as well as daily movements for
foraging. Migrational corridors may include areas of unobstructed movement of deer, riparian
corridors providing cover for migrating birds,routes between breeding waters and upland habitat for
amphibians, and between roosting and feeding areas for birds: The project site is surrounded by
development on all four sides and contains only a small amount of highly disturbed vegetation.
Therefore, the site does not provide a wildlife movement corridor or nursery site.
During the avian breeding season(typically February 1 through August 31), most birds and their
active nests are protected from"take" (destruction,pursuit,possession, etc.) under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)and/or Sections 3503-3801 of California Fish and Game Code.Activities
that cause destruction of active nests,or that cause nest abandonment and subsequent death of eggs
or young, may constitute violations of one or both of these laws. Trees on site and adjacent to the
site provide suitable nesting habitat for small birds.Although no birds were observed using the site
at the time of the survey,birds protected under the MBTA and/or Fish and Game Code may use the
site for nesting. If development of the project occurs during the breeding season,a nesting survey
should be conducted by a qualified biologist in order to avoid impacts to nesting avian species.
Mitigation Measure
BIO-01 Removal of existing on-site trees must be conducted outside the avian nesting season
(February through August). If construction occurs during the avian nesting season,
the project applicant shall provide evidence to the City that a pre-construction
nesting bird survey has been conducted within 7 days prior to any ground
disturbance activities. If birds are found to be nesting inside or within 250 feet(500
Barton Plaza 35 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
5?
feet for raptors) of the area of constraint, the nest or nesting tree plus a 250-foot
buffer must be flagged and avoided until it is determined by a qualified biologist that
active nesting no longer is occurring.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
Lest than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Signincant
Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: o(Mitigation impact impact
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ❑ ❑ ■
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and ❑ ❑
the residents of the State? ❑
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Operation of the proposed on-site uses would require the consumption of electricity, natural gas,
and/or other forms of energy.The proposed on-site uses would consume electricity and natural gas
for lighting,heating,air conditioning,and other uses.The proposed on-site uses would increase the
r demand for natural gas and electricity by approximately 387,600 cubic feet/day and 455,600
kilowatt-hours per day(kWh/day).1 The proposed development would be required to adopt adequate
and appropriate energy conservation measures as required by the City,Southern California Edison,
the Gas Company,and/or other responsible or regulatory energy entities.In addition,the proposed
on-site uses would be designed and constructed to incorporate the energy efficiency and
conservation measures identified in the Uniform Building Code and Title 24; therefore,no impact
related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner?
Construction of the proposed project and related infrastructure would require the use of concrete,
aggregate,asphalt,and other materials.These resources are commercially available in the southern
materials(including aggregate)and the limited scale of the proposed project,no
California region with few or no constraints. Because of the general availability of construction
significant impact
related to the availability of these resources or the resource base from which they are derived would
occur. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
'cable C19- Electricity Consumption and Conditional Energy Intensity by Census Division for Non-Nall Buildings,2003: Part 3.Energy
Information Administration.released December 2006,f. www,.cla.doe.eoviemetycbctsclxcs�003deteiled tables '003_I)n3tint9,�003htrnU
�9.html.website accessed October 14,_'008.
Barton Plaza 36
Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Based on Division of Mines and Geology Mineral Land Classification Maps for the San Bernardino
Production—Consumption Region, the project site is within Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3):1
MRZ-3 is a mineral zone where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from the
available data. The City does not identify the project site as a regionally significant source of
mineral resources.Additionally,no mineral extraction activities have occurred or are occurring on
site. Because of the size and location of the project site and the absence of any identified on-site ,
mineral resource, development of the project site would not result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource or a locally important mineral resource recovery site.No impact related to
this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
IX.Hazards. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
substance(including,but not limited to oil,pesticides,
chemicals,or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
ass or trees? ❑ ❑ ■
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substance(including,but not limited
to,oil,pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
The construction of the proposed project would require the transport of potentially hazardous
materials (e.g., paints and fuels). The transport and use of hazardous materials during the
construction of the proposed project would comply with applicable city, state, and federal
requirements, standards, and/or guidelines pertaining to the use of these substances. Compliance
with applicable hazardous material regulations would reduce any such potential hazardous material
impact to a less than significant level. The proposed project is composed of commercial and
restaurant uses. The commercial operations may sell household chemicals in small quantities and
they may be used on site for store operations. It is not anticipated that the quantity or type of
chemicals kept or transported to the site would cause a significant hazard in relation to this issue.
San Bernardino South Quadrangle:Mineral Land Classification Map:San Bemardino P-C Region,Mineral Land Classification of the Greater
Los Angeles Area,Cali forma Department of Conservation,Division of Mines and Geology,1987
Barton Plaza 37 1nitial Study and Environmental Analysts
St'
Hazardous substances associated with these uses are household chemicals and may include cleaners,
paint,and pesticides;however,these are typically found in small quantities.Therefore,operational
impacts associated with this issue are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation is
required.
As a part of the project,the demolition of approximately 11,700 square feet of existing commercial
buildings would occur. These buildings generally consist of wood-frame construction on concrete
foundations with cinder block brick exteriors and composition roofing shingles. Due to their age
(one of which is over 50 years old), there is a potential that asbestos or lead-based paint may be
present on site. Standard practices require the preparation of an asbestos and lead-based paint report
prior to demolition activities. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines asbestos-
containing material in the amounts more than one percent asbestos b weight.
determined to be between 0.1 and one b weight Y P,h . When materials are
Percent y ght,only the Cal-OSHA requirement applies to
removal procedure.Asbestos Containing Material(ACM)and materials containing"trace"amounts
or more than 0.1 percent asbestos is regulated at a State level.
To determine whether asbestos was present on site,sampling and assessment of materials from each
of the buildings scheduled for demolition was conducted.The results of the assessment are detailed
in Table H.
Table H: Asbestos Survey Results
Address Samples Samples Material Type Affected Areas Approximate
Analyzed identified
as ACM Area(sf)
22448 Barton Road 1
0 2 Roof penetration Roof area edges,
50
�— mastic, good flue area, spotted
condition non friable area
chrysotile 5%
9 x 9 tile, good Floor area 625
condition non friable throughout
chrysotile 8%
22450-22458 Barton Road 24 7 Roof penetration Roof area edges, 300
mastic, good flue area,spotted
condition non friable
chrysotile 5% are, etc
throughout
Acoustic ceiling, All interior 4,500
good condition non- ceiling, units
friable chrysotile 22450-22458
5% throughout
Black floor'mastic Unit 22450- 140
good condition non 22542 rear floor
friable chrysotile area
7%
9 x 9 floor tile and Unit 22454, 3,000
black mastic good 22456, 22458
condition non floor area
friable chrysotile
8%
22470-22478 Barton Road 18 1 Roof penetration Roof area edges, 300
mastic, good flue area, spotted
condition non friable
chrysotile 5°% are. etc
throughout
Barton Plaza 38 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
55
Table H: Asbestos Survey Results
22474 Barton Road,Unit A,B,C 15 2 Roof area edges, Roof area edges, 300
flue area, spotted flue area,spotted
are,etc throughout are, etc
throughout
Floor material good Unit B,floor area 800
condition non
friable chrysotile
5%
Transit flue pipe Roof area 3-5 linear
good condition non feet r `
friable assumed
12506 Mt.Vernon Street 10 3 Roof penetration Roof area edges, 150
mastic, good flue area, spotted
condition non friable are, etc
chrysotile 5% throughout
Linoleum floor Sale floor under 400
good condition non ceramic file and
friable chrysotile bathroom area
20%
Transit pipe flue Roof area 3-5 linear
good condition non feet
friable assumed
Source(s): Report for Asbestos Containing-Material(ACM)22448 Barton Road,Environmental Monitoring Group,September 30,2008
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22450-22458 Barton Road,Environmental Monitoring Group,September 30,2008
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22470-22478 Barton Road,Environmental Monitoring Group,September 30,2008
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22474 Barton Road,Unit A,B,C,Environmental Monitoring Group,September 30.2008
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 12056 Mt.Vernon Street,Environmental Monitoring Group,September 30,2008
Based on the asbestos assessments prepared for the on-site structures,ACM is located in buildings
that will be demolished to accommodate the proposed project.The following mitigation has been
identified to offset potential impacts associated with the disturbance of ACM.
HAZ-01 Prior to the initiation of demolition activities,the applicant shall provide evidence to
the City that contractors and subcontractors conducting work in the affected
structures have been appropriately notified to the presence and location of ACM and
have been informed that disturbance of ACM is prohibited.
HAZ-02 Prior the demolition of the on-site structures,the applicant shall provide evidence to
the City that ACM has been appropriately removed and disposed of.The removal of
any on-site ACM shall be performed by a certified and licensed asbestos abatement
contractor. All removal,disposal,and handling of any ACM shall be in accordance
with current federal, state, and local agency ordinances, laws, and regulations.
While no.other hazardous material was identified within the project limits, in the event that other
potentially hazardous materials are encountered during project grading/construction, Mitigation
Measure HAZ-03 would reduce any impacts associated with such hazardous materials to a less than
significant level.
Mitigation Measure:
HAZ-03 The City shall be immediately notified in the event malodorous or discolored soils,
liquids, containers, or other materials known or suspected to contain hazardous
Barton Plaza 39 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
SF
materials and/or contaminants are encountered during on-site demolition, grading
and construction. Earthmoving activities in the vicinity of said material shall be
halted until the extent and nature of the suspect material is determined by qualified
personnel (as determined by the City). The removal and/or disposal of any such
contaminants shall be in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal
standards.
Finding: Less than Significant with Implementation of Mitigation.
b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The proposed project would be designed, constructed, and maintained to comply with applicable
requirements related to emergency access and evacuation plans. Primary access to the project site
would be through existing adjacent roadways, Barton Road, Mount Vernon Avenue, and Britton
Way,which will become a private access drive. The completed project would not restrict or block
roadways or any identified evacuation route.Construction activities,which may temporarily restrict
vehicular traffic,would be required to implement adequate and appropriate measures to facilitate the
passage of persons and vehicles through/around any required road closures. Adherence to these
standard measures would reduce potential impacts related to this issue to a less than significant level.
Finding: Less than Significant.No mitigation is required.
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?
The commercial and restaurant land uses would not allow for the use,storage,disposal,or transport
of large volumes of toxic,flammable,explosive,or otherwise hazardous materials that could cause
serious health and environmental hazards in the event of an accident. Therefore, no significant
impact would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant.No mitigation is required.
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards?
prepared, there are no known health hazards on the site or in the
Based on visual assessments conducted of the project site during the various technical studies
immediate surrounding area: The
Department of Toxic Substance Control(DTSC)does not identify the proposed project site on its Hazardous Waste and Substance Site(Cortese)List.' In the absence of any health hazard identified
within the limits of the project site, no impact would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant.No mitigation is required.
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees?
Env iroStor Database,California Department of Toxic Substances Control,nno..•;www+enviro;tor disc ca Gov,website accessed Ocmber 23,'008.
Barton Plaza 40 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
S7
The project site is within an area that is developed with commercial uses and is not located within a
high fire hazard area.' The majority of the project site is currently developed and surrounded by
existing development. As required of all construction in the City, proposed structures within the
project'limits would meet the current fire protection requirements, which may include interior
sprinklers and smoke alarms, enclosed eaves, and the use of appropriate roofing material and
shingles. Additionally, implementation of the,proposed project would include the installation of
irrigated landscaping throughout the project. No impact related to fire hazards would occur as a
result of the development of the project site. No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required. -
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially I Significant Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
X.Noise.Would the project result in:
a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
a and b) Increase in existing noise levels or expose people to severe noise levels?
The City of Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element,adopted October 2003,requires that noise-
sensitive land uses not exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dBA CNEL,while interior noise levels r
are not to exceed 45 dBA CNEL."Sensitive"land uses typically include residences,parks,churches,
schools,and hospitals. The Noise Impact AnalysW prepared for the proposed project assesses the
project with respect to on and off-site generated noise. The majority of the land surrounding the
project is commercial property;however,the land uses to the northwest of the project are residential
and,therefore,the noise study compares the City's residential noise limits to the predicted stationary
noise and roadway noise from the site.
Short-Term Noise
Short-term noise impacts would be associated with excavation;grading,and erecting of buildings on
site during construction of the proposed project.Construction is completed in discrete steps,each of
which has its own mix of equipment and,consequently,its own noise characteristics.These various
sequential phases would change the character of the noise generated on the site and, therefore,the
noise levels surrounding the site as construction progresses.Despite the variety in the type and size
of construction equipment,similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow
construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase.The site preparation phase,which
includes excavation and grading of the site, tends to generate the highest noise levels because the
noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment.
Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earthmovers,bulldozers,and
water and pickup trucks. The maximum noise level generated by each earthmover on the proposed
project site is assumed to be 88 dBA Lo.at 50 feet from the earthmover. Each bulldozer would also
generate 88 dBA L,,.at 50 feet.The maximum noise level generated by water and pickup trucks is
City of Grand Terrace Draft General Plan Update 2(M Exhibit 5-3.
tlounr Vernon avenue and Barran Road Commercial Center acauwical Smdv.RK Engineering Group,Inc.,August 4.2008.
Barton Plaza 41 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
�9
approximately 86 dBA Lmu at 50 feet from these vehicles.Each doubling of the sound sources with
equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction
equipment operates at some distance from the other equipment,the worst-case combined noise level
during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA L.. at a distance of 50 feet from the active
construction area.
The residences nearest to the project site are approximately 50 feet to the west of the project site.
These residences may be subject to short-term, intermittent noise generated by construction
activities on the project site.Construction-related noise impacts from the proposed project would be
above the City's identified exterior and interior noise levels of 65 dBA CNEL and 45 dBA CNEL.
However, the City states that construction noise that occurs during the daytime would have a
minimal impact during identified construction hours.1 The proposed project is located adjacent to a
residential neighborhood. Noise impacts may result from construction activities from the project
development. Compliance with the construction standards incorporated as Mitigation Measures
NOS-01 through NOS-05 would reduce the construction noise impacts to a less than significant
level.
Long-Term Noise
The proposed project would result in the construction of commercial uses.Adjacent land uses to the
proposed project consist of similar commercial uses with residential areas beyond the adjacent
commercial to the northwest and the northeast.
The stationary noise from the project site would include truck deliveries,loading dock operations,
and speakerphone usage. The noise impacts from these sources would vary with operation use.
Noise levels from the proposed project site are not anticipated to have a significant impact to the nearest sensitive land use(Residential).The worst case unmitigated noise level from the project site
would range from 55.7 to 58.6 dBA Leq during daytime hours. It is recommended that a four foot
shielding wall be placed along the northern loading dock of the Fresh and Easy Building. The
predicted mitigated noise level to the residential units north of the project is 53.7 dBA Leq. While
this represents an increase in the noise level over the existing condition,it is below the threshold of a
significant impact,established by San Bernardino County.This standard is more restrictive than the
City's ordinance in regard to noise levels; however, all noise-related impacts can be mitigated to
insignificant levels.
It is expected that roadway traffic along Mount Vernon and Barton Road would be the main source
of off-site roadway noise impacting the project site. The projected build out ADT volumes taken
from the traffic study were used to predict the exterior noise levels for the project site.Noise levels
along Mount Vernon Avenue are expected to increase by 1.6 dBA.Noise levels along Barton Road
are expected to increase by 1.5 dBA.An audible change in noise volume is detectable by humans at
3 dBA.While a measurable noise increase is expected to occur based on roadway noise,it would be
below a level that would be detected by humans as a change and therefore would not be a significant
increase.Therefore,impacts associated with this issue are less than significant and no mitigation is
required for the operational phase of the proposed project.
Mitigation Measure:
Section 6.3.1.J Construction:Noise. Voise Element,Draft Grand Terrace General Plan,City of Grand Terrace,January 17.2008.
Barton Plaza 42 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
r1ta
NOS-01 During all project site excavation and grading on site, the project contractors shall
equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and
maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards.
NOS-02 The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that
emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
NOS-03 The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that would create
the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive
receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
NOS-04 On-site construction activities shall be restricted to the hours permitted under the
City's Noise Ordinance.The Noise Ordinance limits construction activities between
the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays.
NOS-05 A four-foot shielding wall shall be constructed along the northern portion of the
Fresh and Easy building loading dock to reduce the impact of operational noise from
the loading dock on the residential sensitive receptors to the northwest of the project.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
Less than
Signiflcant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Signiflcant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
XI. Public Services.Would the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered government services in
any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
e Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
a) Fire protection?
Under contract to the City of Grand Terrace,the San Bernardino County Fire Department(SBCFD)
provides fire protection to the City. Primary fire protection services are operated from the City's
only fire station,Station No.23,located at 22592 City Center,approximately one mile southeast of
the project site.This station is staffed by three full-time fire personnel during the fire season(May 1
through November 30)and by two full-time fire personnel during the non-fire season(December 1
through April 30). The full-time personnel are augmented by an on-call company of 15 paid call
firefighters who respond to fire and rescue calls and provide response coverage to the state when on-
duty personnel are committed to an emergency call. Fire and rescue vehicles include a Type 1 Fire
Engine, a Type 3 Rescue Truck, a Type 2 Squad Truck, and one Shoring Trailer. During 2006,
personnel at Station 23 responded to 1,091 calls for service in the City,an average of 2.98 calls for
service per day. Typically, 70 percent of calls for service are related to medical emergencies. The
Barton Plaza 43 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
cr
SBCFD has established a response goal of six minutes in the City.Station 23's current response time
of 5.07 minutes is within the existing established goal.'
All fire personnel and facilities of the SBCFD are available to the City's contract fire services.In the
event of an emergency that challenges existing capabilities, the City of Grand Terrace may also
request assistance from surrounding jurisdictions pursuant to established mutual aid agreements.
Development of the proposed project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection
services. The proposed project would be designed and constructed- per applicable fire
fire flow
prevention/protection standards, including the determination of the water supply to meet requirements. Fire Department personnel have reviewed the proposed project including site plans
r— and determined that the project can be served. Therefore, impacts related to the provision of fire
protection services are less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Police protection?
Police services to the project area would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sherriff s
Department (SBCFD). The nearest police station to the project site is located at 655 East Third
Street, approximately 5.25 miles northeast of the project site. Development of the proposed
commercial and restaurant uses may result in an incremental increase in demand for police
protection services. Sheriffs Department personnel have reviewed the proposed project and have
determined that the Department can serve the project.Therefore,impacts related to the provision for
police protection services to a less than significant level.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Schools?
School facilities and services in the City are provided by the Colton Joint Unified School District
(CJUSD).Government Code Section 65995(b)establishes the base amount of allowable developer
fees and allows an increase in the base fee every two years.School districts are placed into a specific
"level" based on school impact fee amounts that are imposed on the development. The proposed
project would require-payment of development fees to the CJUSD, which totals $0.42 per square
foot for commercial development.Z These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of
the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating
and facilities.The project proponent would be required to pay these development
with Government Code 65995 and Education Code 17620. With a of the
fees in accordance
uired re
development fee,a less than significant impact on school facilities and services is expected togoccur
and no mitigation would be required.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Telephone conversation with Gary Bush,Battalion Chief,February 14,2007
relephone conversation with Chella Huntimer, administrative Assistant(,Colton Joint Lni ied School District,(909)580-5000 ext.6640.
September 18,2007
Barton Plaza 44
Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
61
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
The proposed project would result in the development of approximately 34,000 square feet of
commercial uses and would increase additional passenger car trips on local roads.The City of Grand
Terrace has established a Capital Improvement and Maintenance Fee Schedule Program to fund the
construction of traffic improvements to the local and regional roadway system. The impact fee is
assessed on new development to fund necessary roadway improvements needed to maintain
adequate-levels of service and to prevent further degradation of roadway facilities that currently
operate below the prescribed LOS standard.The Traffic Impact Fee is imposed on new development
and collected at the building permit stage for any development that produces additional vehicle trips _
over that attributed to land being developed before the new development is in place.After the impact
fees are collected, they are placed in separate interest-bearing accounts in compliance with the
requirements of Government Code,Section 66000 et seq.These fees are then made available to the
City to implement identified roadway improvements.The timing of the improvements is established
through the City's capital improvement program.Periodically,the City conducts traffic counts and
reviews traffic trends throughout the City. The City uses these data to determine the timing of
necessary roadway improvements and to ensure that construction and needed improvements occurs
prior to or concurrent with the time at which the identified roadway segment or intersection level of
service(LOS)is forecast to fail to achieve at performance levels established by the City. In this way,
improvements are typically constricted before the LOS degrades beyond the City's performance
standards to ensure that significant impacts are avoided. Many of the streets included within the
study area for this report are at various stages of widening and improvement based on the City's
collection of fees. As a result of its continual monitoring of the local circulation system, the City
ensures that roadway improvements are constructed prior to the time that the LOS deteriorates below
the City's established performance criteria.Therefore,implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts related to the maintenance of public roadways and a less than significant impact i
would occur.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
e) Other governmental services?
It is anticipated that the residents that the proposed project would serve already reside in the local
community. The proposed project is a commercial development and would not increase the
population of the City.Therefore,no large increase in City's population would occur and no impact
relating to this issue would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 45 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
62
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Significant
Impact with Less than
Signiflcaat Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitt anon Impact Impact
XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the project result
in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
\a) Power or natural gas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
b) Communications systems? ❑ ❑ ❑
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
e) Stormwater drainage? ❑ ❑ ❑
f) Solid waste disposal? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ■
a) Power or natural gas?
Electric service to the site is provided by Southern California Edison(SCE), while natural gas is
provided by the Gas Company.The proposed on-site uses would consume electricity and natural gas
for lighting,heating,air conditioning,and other uses.The proposed on-site uses would increase the
demand for natural gas and electricity by approximately 813,120 cubic feet/year (2,228 cubic
feet/day)and 798,311 kilowatt-hours per year(2,187 kWh/day)).I The proposed development would
t - adopt adequate and appropriate energy conservation measures as required by the City,SCE,the Gas
Company, and/or other responsible/regulatory energy entities. Prior to the issuance of building
permits,the developer shall be required to submit plans showing the incorporation of energy use and
conservation measures into the project in accordance with applicable City energy regulations and/or
Title 24 of the California Administrative Code.Upon compliance with these requirements,potential
impacts associated with this issue would be reduced to a less than significant level.Implementation
of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Communications systems?
Telephone service is directly available from Verizon,which typically provides service on demand.
This service presently exists at the site to serve the existing commercial uses within an underground
conduit along existing roadways in the project vicinity such as Barton Road and Mount Vernon
Avenue and no additional off-site improvements are required. With coordination with the local
telephone provider, no impact associated with this issue is anticipated. No mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
rable C19-Electricity Consumption and Conditional Energy Intensity by Census Division for Non-Mall Buildings.2003. Part 3.Energy
Information Administration. released December _006 iurp:r www.cia.doe.gov/emcWcbecs;cbecs2003'detailed-tables-2003,'003set9,2003htmi/c9.htmi.webstte accessed October 14.2008.
Barton Plaza 46 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
ti�
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
The project would result in the consumption of additional water for human consumption and
irrigation. Water service for the proposed project would be provided by the Riverside Highland
Water Company (RHWC). The Company provides potable water to City of Grand Terrace and
portions of the City of Colton and unincorporated areas of Riverside County(Highgrove): Water
service is currently provided via a water line within the Mount Vernon Avenue right-of-way.Prior to
the issuance ,of building permits, the project applicant would be required to satisfy RHWC
requirements related to the payment of fees and/or the provision of adequate water facilities. All
facilities would be designed,installed,and maintained to meet RHWC standards for domestic water
supply. As all development in the City is required to satisfy standard RHWC service conditions, a
less than significant impact related to this issue would occur.
Finding. Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
The City contracts with the City of Colton Public Utilities Department for wastewater treatment.
Based on a wastewater generation factor of 80 gallons of wastewater per 1,000 square feet of
restaurant use and 300 gallons of wastewater per 1,000 square feet of commercial use per day,' the
proposed project would increase wastewater flows in local conveyance and treatment facilities by
approximately 2,727 gallons per day.Prior to the issuance of building permits,the project applicant
would be required to satisfy standard service requirements related to the payment of fees and/or the
provision of wastewater facilities.All facilities would be designed,installed,and maintained to meet
the standards established by the City of Grand Terrace and the City of Colton Public Utilities
Department. As all development in the City is required to satisfy standard wastewater service
requirements,no significant wastewater conveyance or treatment capacity impact would result from
the occupancy of the proposed on-site uses. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
e) Stormwater drainage?
The development of the proposed project would maintain the current on-site and off-site drainage
patterns. Flows generated by the proposed project would exit the site in the same locations as they
do in the existing conditions. Flows exiting the site would be conveyed to the existing storm drain
system. The project applicant would be required to install drainage features, which would be
designed and approved through the plan check process.On-site drainage features would be designed,
installed, and maintained per applicable County and/or City standards. Because the project
proponent would be required to adhere to standards and regulations set forth by the City Public
Works Department in regard to the installation of new drainage conveyance features, impacts are
anticipated to be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Exhibit.N.2-12 Sewage Generation Factors.Draft L.A.CEQA Thresholds Guide,2006.
Barton Plaza 47 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
9ZA
f) Solid waste disposal?
Solid waste collection services in the City are provided under contract with Burrtec Waste
Industries, Inc. The average employee in the City of Grand Terrace generates approximately 8.9
pounds of solid waste per day.' Based on this solid waste generation, the proposed on-site uses
would generate approximately 2,448 pounds (1.22 tons) of waste per day.2 Solid waste from the
proposed project would be transported to the San Timoteo Landfill.The San Timoteo Landfill has a
daily permitted throughput of 1,000 tons per day and currently accepts 593 tons per day.3 This
landfill facility has a remaining capacity of 2,562,614.01 tons and an estimated closure date of 2016.
Waste generated from the proposed project would be approximately 0.12 percent of the daily
permitted throughput and approximately 0.29 percent of the daily existing surplus capacity. As a
substantial daily surplus capacity exists at the San Timoteo landfill, development of the proposed
project would not significantly impact current operation or the expected lifetime of this facility.
Therefore, a less than significant impact is anticipated to occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
g) Local or regional water supplies?
The development of the proposed on-site uses would increase the overall demand for water within
the RHWC service area.Based on a water consumption factor of 0.146 acre-feet per employee per
year, the proposed project would require 40.15 acre-feet per year or 35,844 gallons of water per
r~ day.4 It is anticipated that any land uses consistent with the City's General Plan would have been
taken into account for water supply planning process for RHWC's Urban Water Management Plan
(UWMP). Since the proposed project is consistent with the land use identified for the project site,it
is reasonable to conclude that such land uses and water demands have been taken into account by
RHWC. Therefore,while the development of the proposed on-site uses would increase the overall
demand for water within the RHWC service area,it is anticipated that RHWC would have adequate
water supplies to serve the proposed project. Therefore, no significant impact related to this issue
would occur. No mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
t City of Grand Terrace Business Disposal Rates, California Integrated Waste Management Board,
http:;Iwww ciwmb.ca.govwProfilesJuris,JurProfile1 asp"RG=C&JO;RIBI80&JO;R=Grand*'terrace.website accessed October 23.2008.
275 employees•8.9 pounds of solid wastelemployeeMay,=2,448 Ibs/day:2,000 lbs'= 1.22 ton.
E-mail communication with Patrick Egle,San Bernardino County Solid Waste Management Division,May_'008.
0.146 acre-feet per employee per year•275 employees=40.15 acre-feet per yeari365 days per year=0.11 acre-foot per employee per day;0.11
acre-foot 1 325.851 gallonsi I acre-foot=35.844 gallons per day
Barton Plaza 48 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
AR
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c Create light orglare? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
The proposed project is located adjacent to the existing commercial uses and development. Barton
Road and Mount Vernon Avenue are not identified as scenic highway corridors in the City's General
Plan or by the state;therefore,the proposed project would not affect a designated or eligible scenic
highway.
Views afforded from the project site consist of existing single-family residential uses to the west,
vacant land to the north, and commercial to the east and south. Beyond the developed area
immediately surrounding the project Blue Mountain is visible to the southeast and the San
Bernardino Mountains can be seen to the north.The proposed project would slightly modify views
of the project site but would not obstruct views of Blue Mountain or the San Bernardino Mountains
to any greater extent than what occurs in the existing developed condition of the site. Because the
proposed project would not significantly impact a designated or eligible scenic highway or scenic
resource,impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant and no mitigation would '
be required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
Because the project site is adjacent to existing commercial development, the development of the
proposed commercial and restaurant uses would not result in an adverse aesthetic impact. During
construction, there would be several temporary visual impacts, such as exposed earth and job site
equipment. These visual impacts are temporary and would not have a significant impact on
surrounding uses.
The proposed project would comply with the existing design guidelines of the City and the Barton
Road Specific Plan.As the proposed project is subject to City review and approval through the plan
check process, it is anticipated that the project's visual elements would be consistent with the
existing adjacent uses.Additionally the proposed project would remove existing structures,except
for an existing 6,900-square foot building at the southeast corner of the site, that are currently in a
state of disrepair and are not of a consistent or cohesive design theme.The proposed project would
create new development in the place of the existing structures and rehabilitate the fagade of the
existing structure that would be of a cohesive theme that includes architectural elements as required
by the Barton Road Specific Plan that would improve the aesthetics of the site.
h!n:, www dot.ca.gov'hq,LandArch'sceniclschwv htm,site accessed November 14.:008.
Barton Plaza 49 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
tiF
The Barton Road Specific Plan encourages building architecture that have a rich surfaces and/or
textures,that articulate with the use of insets,trellises,and articulation of wall planes.The buildings
are proposed to have a stucco finish with the incorporation of a ledger stone wainscoting,variation
in building wall planes, the use of trellises, and insets. The use of large blank unarticulated stucco
walls is potentially undesirable within the Barton Road Specific Plan.While stucco is predominately
used in the building architecture of the commercial center,there are no blank unarticulated surfaces
and building walls are treated as previously mentioned.
The Barton Road Specific Plan permits a relaxation of development standards as an incentive when a
developer consolidates lots.In this instance,the developer is consolidating nine separate lots and is
�- requesting a reduction in the amount of landscaping to be provided for the project.A review of the
proposed site and landscaping plans indicate that the reduction in landscaping will not have a
demonstrable negative visual effect and can be supported.
Development of the proposed project would not completely obstruct any prominent scenic view or
vista,or create a negative visual impact to the environment.As such,impacts related to this issue are
considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Create light or glare?
Development of the proposed commercial uses would necessitate the installation of outdoor lighting
necessary for parking,signage,and the maintenance of public safety and security.The City of Grand
Terrace has established standards in Section 18.60.040(C) of the City's Municipal Code for the
design,placement,and operation of outdoor lighting.'These standards identify the preferred lighting
source,maximum lighting intensity,and dictate shielding requirements.Because these standards are
imposed on all outdoor lighting sources and because such standards must be adhered to in order to
obtain project approval, these requirements are not considered mitigation. While the proposed
development would slightly increase the number and distribution of light sources in the vicinity of
the project, adherence to the lighting standards established by the City would reduce potential
impacts related to this issue through limiting the intensity and extent of lighting for commercial uses.
Therefore, impact associated with this issue would be less than significant level. No mitigation is
required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Section M.60 040{C).City of Grand'rerrace Municipal Code,City of Grand Terrace.
Barton Plaza 50 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
67
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitt ation Impact Impact
XIV. Cultural Resources.Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? p 17 0
b) Disturb archaeological resources? p U
Ll
c) Affect historical resources? p Ll
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ l�"._
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the O 1] 0
potential impact area?
a—c) Disturb paleontological, archaeological,and/or historical resources?
The existing buildings on the project site were evaluated for historical significance.' Based on this
evaluation,only one of the buildings is 50 years of age or older and,therefore,needs to be addressed
as a cultural resource pursuant to CEQA.The building greater than 50 years of age consists of a one-
story,masonry single-family residence that was constructed in 1951 and has since been altered and
converted into an office.Exterior alterations include a large shed-roof addition on the west side of
the building, installation of a modem door, and the replacement of all landscaping with paving.
Since the extensive alterations have significantly compromised the building's ability to convey its
association with the historic period,no additional research was completed to determine whether or
not the building is associated with events or persons significant in local,state,or national history.
The City of Grand Terrace has a Historical and Cultural Activities Committee and utilizes the
California Register of Historical Resources(CRHR)criteria for determining historical significance.
For purposes of CEQA compliance, the CRHR criteria are used.
1. The building is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;
2. The building is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national
history;
3. The building embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method or
construction,or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; and/or
4. The building has yielded,or has the potential to yield,information important to the prehistory or
history of the local area,California,or the nation.
The building does not appear to meet any of the criteria for listing in the CRHR and,therefore,is not
a historical resource under CEQA.None of the other buildings in the project area are 50 years of age
or older; therefore,they do not require further consideration as cultural resources.
There is little potential for previously undocumented cultural resources within the project boundaries
due to the level of prior ground disturbances and development on site. Although the project site is
' Buildings at the Northwest Corner of:Noun Vernon avenue and Barton Road in Grand Terrace.t/emo, LSA.Associates Inc.,September'_6.
_1008.
Barton Plaza 51 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
6F
not anticipated to yield any paleontological,archaeological,and/or historical resources,the potential
for unknown buried paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resources is present.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-01 would ensure that any potential impacts to
paleontological,archeological,and/or historical resources are reduced to a less than significant level.
:Mitigation Measure:
CUL-01 In the event that a paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resource are
uncovered during the course of the construction phase of the project, ground
disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature
and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or
paleontologist(as determined by the City).Any such resource uncovered during the
course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed
per applicable City and/or State regulations.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
The project site has not been identified as a location possessing unique ethnic cultural values.While
no evidence has been identified suggesting the site possessed any cultural significance, the
movement of on-site soils may uncover previously unidentified cultural resource materials.While it
is not likely such an incident would occur, adherence to the previously identified Mitigation
a^ Measure CUL-01 in Responses XIV (a—c) would ensure no significant cultural resource impact
would result from the development of the proposed on-site uses.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation.
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area?
The City has not identified the proposed project site as one that has been utilized for religious or
sacred purposes. Additionally,no evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for
human burials.The California Health and Safety Code(Section 7050.5)states that if human remains
are discovered on site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a
determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As
adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the
unlikely event human remains are discovered on site. No impact to a sacred or religious site,
including a human interment site, would occur.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Barton Plaza 52 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
69
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially SignificantImpact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
XV.Recreation.Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
parks or other recreational facilities?
b Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
r'
a-b) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities?
The majority of the site is currently developed with commercial uses and the project does not
propose any residential uses that would increase the number of residents that would utilize
recreational facilities. The proposed project would not remove any currently used recreational
facilities.Further,the developer will be required to contribute to the City's Capital Improvement and
Maintenance Fund Schedule,including Parkland and Open Space Acquisition Fund.No impact to
parks or other recreational facilities would occur and no mitigation is required.
Finding: No Impact.No mitigation is required.
Less than
Significant
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
XVI. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
quality of the environment,substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community,reduce the number or restrict the range of
rare or endangered plant or animal,eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
term goals to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental objectives?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually :❑ ❑ ■ ❑
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
other probable future projects.) ,
d) Does the project have environmental effects that will ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Barton Plaza 53 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
7n
Less than
Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Significant
Impact with Less than
Significant Implementation Significant No
Impact of Mitigation Impact Impact
cause substantial adverse effect on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the
number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Development of the proposed project would result in the demolition of 11,700 square feet of existing
commercial building area,the retention of an existing 6,900-square foot commercial building,and
new construction of 35,000 square feet of commercial uses on approximately 3.6 acres of partially
developed land in the City of Grand Terrace.The proposed project would not impact any threatened
or endangered species or habitat.As stated in this Initial Study,the proposed project does not have
the potential to degrade the quality of the environment with respect to the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species,nor would it cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory. Therefore, impacts related to this issue are considered to be less than
significant.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-tern goals to the disadvantage of long-
term environmental objectives?
The proposed project site is currently partially developed with commercial uses and a vacant land on
the project's northern side.The project is adjacent to existing commercial uses.Grading and related
site preparation activities are expected to cause short-tern impacts. However, while short-term
impacts are anticipated to occur,the achievement of short-tern environmental goals would not be at
the expense of long-term environmental goals.As such,impacts related to this issue are considered
to be less than significant.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.)
The proposed project site is located within an area that has been designated by the City for
commercial uses. While short-term construction-related air quality and noise impacts would result
from construction of the proposed commercial uses,adherence to the standard City regulations and
Barton Plaza 54 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
71
mitigation identified in this Initial Study would reduce these impacts to a less than significant level.
The proposed project would be consistent with surrounding land uses and would not have effects
that are cumulatively considerable. Therefore, potential impacts associated with land use
compatibility,land use density,noise,and aesthetics would be less than significant and no mitigation
would be required.
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
d) Does the project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effect on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Future build out of the proposed project may result in direct and indirect impacts to human beings,
such as exposure to hazards associated with strong seismic ground-shaking, increased traffic, and
impacts to air quality.However,based on the information provided,such impacts are anticipated to
be less than significant due to adherence to standard requirements or reduced to a less than
significant level with the identified mitigation measures. '
Finding: Less than Significant Impact.No mitigation is required.
XVU. Earlier Analysis.
Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR,or negative declaration.Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analysis used.Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review.
■ Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and EIR. Both
documents are available at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic
Development Department.
b) Impacts adequately addressed.Identify which effects from the above checklist were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on
the earlier analysis.
■ Not Applicable
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant Impact with
Implementation of Mitigation," describe the mitigation measured incorporated or refined
from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project.
■ Not Applicable
Barton Plaza 55 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
-7-
REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation—Division of Mines and Geology,San Bernardino South
Quadrangle:Mineral Land Classification Map:San Bernardino P-CRegion, Mineral Land
Classification of the Greater Los Angeles Area, California, 1987.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Database,
hft://www.c,nViTOstor.dtsc.ca.gov, website accessed October 23,2008.
California-Department of Transportation, Scenic Highways, httv://www.dot.ca.gov/hg/LandArch/
scenic/schwv.htm,site accessed November 14,2008.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Action Team Report to Governor
Schwarzenegger and the Legislature,March 2006.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, City of Grand Terrace Business Disposal Rates,
http://www.ciwmb.ca-gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfilel.asp?RG=C&JURID=l 80&JUR=Grand+
Terrace, website accessed October 23,2008.
City of Grand Terrace,Draft City of Grand Terrace General Plan,January 17,2008.
City of Grand Terrace,Municipal Code.
City of Grand Terrace,Zoning Code Chapter 18.60—Off-Street Parking, 2001, website accessed
October 13,2008.
r`
Collins & Associates Engineering, Inc., Preliminary Drainage Report for Grand Terrace
Commercial Plaza, May 2008.
Collins&Associates Engineering. Inc., Grand Terrace Commercial Center Barton Road and Mt.
Vernon Avenue Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), May 1,2008.
Colton Joint Unified School District,Telephone conversation with Chella Huntimer,Administrative
Assistant 1, (909)580-5000 ext. 6640, September 18,2007.
Draft L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide,Exhibit M.2-12 Sewage Generation Factors, 2006.
Energy Information Administration, Table C19: Electricity Consumption and Conditional Energy
Intensity by Census Division for Non-Mall Buildings, 2,003, release December 2006,
hqp://Www.eig.—doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed tables 2003/2003set9/2003html/c9
html, website accessed October 14, 2008.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Flood Zone Panel 06071 C8687F, FEMA Q3
Data, 1996.
Barton Plaza 56 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
71
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data, Predefined Queries, Annex I Parties - GHG total without
LULUCF(land use,land-use change,and forestry),United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change,
http://unfccc.int/ghg emissions_data/predefined_queries/itemst384Lphp,2007,site accessed
January 21, 2008.
Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004. Staff Final Report,
CEC-600-2006-013-SF,http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-600-2006-013/CEC-
600-2006-013-SF.PDF,pg.17, California Energy Commission December 2006.
LSA Associates, Inc., Biological Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon and Barton Road
Commercial Center, City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, October 17,2008. "
LSA Associates,Inc.,Buildings at the Northwest Corner of Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road
in Grand Terrace Memo, September 26,2008.
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material(A CAI) 22448 Barton Road, Environmental Monitoring
Group, September 30,2008.
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22450-22458 Barton Road, Environmental Monitoring
Group, September 30, 2008.
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22470-22478 Barton Road, Environmental Monitoring
Group, September 30,2008.
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 22474 Barton Road, Unit A, B, C, Environmental ,!
Monitoring Group, September 30,2008.
Report for Asbestos Containing-Material 12056 Mt. Vernon Street, Environmental Monitoring
Group, September 30,2008.
RK Engineering Group, Inc., Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center
Acoustical Study, August 4, 2008.
RK Engineering Group,Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Traffic Impact
Study, August 5, 2008.
Salem Engineering Group,Geotechnical Engineering Investigation,Proposed Retail Development,
Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue, Grand Terrace, May 30, 2008.
San Bernardino County Solid Waste Management Division, Patrick Egle, email communication,
May 2008.
Barton Plaza 57 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis
71.
Attachment 9
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF GRAND TERRACE
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BRITTON WAY
PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4,
PART 3, DIVISION 9, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Dr. Robert Ha to vacate a portion of Britton
S } Way measuring approximately 30 to 50 feet wide and 361 feet long and located west of Mount
Vernon Avenue, as legally described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" and attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, this portion of Britton Way is not shown on the General Plan Circulation Element
Master Plan of Streets and Highways; and
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2008, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2008-
03 finding the proposed abandonment of that portion of Britton Way depicted on Exhibit `B",
attached hereto, is consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2009, the City Council passed and adopted a Resolution of Intent,
Resolution No. 2009-01 declaring its intention to vacate that portion of Britton Way, depicted on
Exhibit`B", attached hereto; and
r
WHEREAS, the City has conspicuously posted notices of the proposed street vacation on that
portion of Britton Way proposed to be vacated, in accordance with Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, notice of
the proposed vacation was legally published for two consecutive weeks in the local newspaper;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given its consideration for the vacation of a portion of Britton
Way; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council to vacate the portion of Britton Way
pursuant to the authority provided by Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9, of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, properties to the west of the vacated portion of Britton Way have legal and
physical access to public streets and will not be landlocked by the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, portions of Britton Way to be vacated will continue to be used by the general
public; and
1
7S
WHEREAS, the City Council has made findings that relief from the burden of maintenance of
Britton Way has been determined to be of sufficient public benefit; and
WHEREAS, in the proceedings herein adopted by this City Council for vacation of streets
legally described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit `B" the City of Grand Terrace reserves
and excepts from the vacation the permanent easement and right at any time, to construct,
maintain, operate, replace, remove and renew sanitary sewers and storm drains and appurtenant
structures in, upon, over and across any street or part thereof proposed to construct, maintain,
operate replace, remove, renew and enlarge lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles, and
other convenient structures, equipment and fixtures for the operation if gas pipe lines, telegraphic
and telephone lines,-and for the distribution or transportation of electric energy, petroleum, and
its products, ammonia, water and incidental purposes, including access and right to keep property
free from inflammables materials, and wood growth, and to otherwise protect the same from all
hazards in upon, and over the street proposed to'be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the portion of said street lawfully or
officially known as Britton Way and legally described and depicted on:
EXHIBIT "A" AND EXHIBIT "B"
is hereby vacated.
BE IT FURHTER RESOLVED that from and after the date the resolution is recorded, the
street vacated no longer constitutes a street pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9 of the
Streets and Highways Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall cause a certificate copy of his
Resolution of Vacation, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded without
acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the office of the Recorder
of the County of San Bernardino.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California at a
regular meeting held on the 1 Ot`h day of February 2009.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof
Approved as to form:
John Harper
City Attorney
2
Legal Description
Britton Way Vacation
That portion of Lot 1, Block "E", of Grand Terrace, being a subdivision of
Section 32, Township 1 South, range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, as per Map recorded in Book 11, Page 4, of Maps, Records of the
Recorder of San Bernardino, in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 5789, in the
City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat
recorded in Book 60 of Parcel Maps, Page 97, records of said county, also being
t� a point on the southerly right-of-way of Britton Way;
thence N.89"50'33"E., along the North line of said Parcel 1, a distance of 12.97
feet to the Point of Beginning;
thence N.00°11'44"E., a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-
way of Britton Way, said point being the Northwest Comer of that Parcel
described by document, recorded March 12, 2003 as instrument 162861 In
Official Records of County Recorder;
thence N.89'50'33"E., along the northerly right-of-way of Britton Way, a distance
of 132.09 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly with a radius of
120.00 feet;
thence Easterly along said curve, said curve also being the northerly right-of-way
of Britton Way, through a central angle of 21'02'22", an arc length of 44.06 feet to
the beginning of a reverse curve concave southerly, having a radius of 180.00
feet;
thence Easterly along said curve, said curve also being the northerly right-of-way
of Britton Way, through a central angle of 21°02'22", an arc length of 66.10 feet;
thence N.89"50'33"E., along the northerly right-of-way of Britton Way, a distance
of 95.43 feet;
thence N.45'01'08"E., a distance of 21.15 feet, to a point, said point being the
most Northeasterly corner of that Parcel described by document, recorded March
12, 2003 as instrument 162861 In Official Records of County Recorder;
thence S.00'11'44"W., a distance of 30.38 feet;
thence N.89'59'26"W.., a distance of 11.00 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-
way of Mt. Vernon Avenue;
thence S.00'11'44"W., along the westerly right-of-way of Mt. Vernon Avenue, a
distance of 34.50 feet, to a point on the Northerly Line of the Southerly 345.00 of
said Lot 1 of Block "E", said line also being the North Line of Parcel 1 and 2 of
said Parcel Map No. 5789 and the easterly prolongation of said Parcels 1 and 2;
thence S.89°50'33"W., along said North Line, a distance of 360.98 feet to the
Point of Beginning; �0 AND So
The above described area being 14,346.85 sq. ft. � gLF
ALFRED J, o
THE ELL
EXP.09-30-09 7F
Alt N - NO. 6999
77
EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 1 of 1
BRITTON WAY VACATION
A=21'02'22"
o oti'�5v'o o R=180.00' N45'01'08"E II i d�
o L=66.10' 21 15' o' ' 'o'�
R=120.00' I
QWz N89'5033E 95.43Ga L=44.06'
N89'50'33"E 132.09' 2 JW
II
' ,-, N89'59'26"W Q
— — — --— =aRtT-: dN WAY 11.00'
S89'50'33"W�- 360.98' I j
C? N89'50'33"E — —— — —— J~ I I ja:
0CD
n: 12.97' roc Jyo� I �I
0
S QM o�iaceS�a n I �
F
N&I ;o91
?5 9L
V� ALFRED J. Fo
i THEMELL
EXP 09-30-09
NO.6999
�OF CAL�FC'Q
FR
SCALE: 1 " = 60'
7Q
Attachment 10
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 08-02 AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGTATIVE DECLARATION TO
CONSOLIDATE NINE LOTS AND RESUBDIVIDE INTO FOUR NEW
PARCELS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BARTON
ROAD AND MOUNT VERNON AVENUE ZONED BRSP-VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL
r�l (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0275-251-14, 21 27,30, 31, 32, 55, 73
AND 74)
WHEREAS, Dr. Robert Ha ("Applicant") has applied for the approval of Tentative
Parcel Map No.08-02 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131) to consolidate nine existing lots and re-
subdivide them into four new commercial parcels ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant, submitted concurrent applications consisting of Site and
Architectural Review 08-09, Conditional Use Permit 08-05, Environmental 08-02 to redevelop
approximately 3.6 acres of land by demolishing existing structures, retaining a 6,900 square foot
commercial building, and constructing a 24-hour 14,820 square foot drug store with prescription
pick up window, a 24-hour 13,969 square foot grocery store, and a 5,300 square foot multi-
tenant restaurant with associated parking, landscaping, and lighting.
r
WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a concurrent application for the Vacation of a
portion of Britton Way.
R
WHEREAS, an environmental Initial Study was prepared pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was circulated for public review from November 26,
2008 to December 15, 2008. The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a
significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into
the project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant levels with respect to Geology,
Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Hazards, Noise and Cultural Resources and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and voted to recommend that the City Council approve
the Project.
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2009, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road,
Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded said hearing on that date.
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Page 1 of 7
7a
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Pursuant to Section '15073.5 of CEQA the revisions to the Mitigated Negative
Declaration do not create new avoidable impacts requiring re-circulation of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
2. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, and
substantial evidence in the record, the Project will not have a significant effect on the
environment because all potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level
of non-significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures in the project
approval. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared
in connection with the Project have been reviewed and considered and reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and are hereby adopted.
3. That the proposed map, its design or improvements are consistent with applicable general
and specific plans. The proposed map, its design and improvements are consistent with
the minimum size requirements contained in the Barton Road Specific Plan and
Administrative Professional zone district. The map provides for a shared access point at
the west property as required by the Barton Road Specific Plan when lot assembly totals
less 300 feet of street frontage. The project is consistent with the Circulation Element
because additional right of way is being dedicated along Mount Vernon Avenue and
Barton Road. The Project is consistent with the Noise Element to require new
commercial development adjacent to residential to incorporate noise mitigation and to
comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. It is promotes the Natural Resources Element
regarding energy conservation; Visual Resources because it does not significantly impact
view corridors; and Community Design because it provides for retail and general
commercial uses.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the type or density of development. The tentative
map has been filed with SA 08-09 and CUP 08-05,and the site plan demonstrates that the
proposed parcels can accommodate anticipated development of the 3.6-acre site,
including compliance with building setbacks, building and landscaping coverage
requirements, in accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan and Development Code.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat. An environmental Initial Study was prepared, which determined that the
project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation
measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all potential impacts to
insignificant levels with respect to Geology, Transportation/Circulation, Biological
Resources, Hazards, Noise and Cultural Resources.
6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious
public health problems. The tentative map can accommodate anticipated development of
Page 2of7
Qr
the site and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce
potential environmental impacts to levels of insignificance.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision. This finding,can be made because no conflicting easements
exist on the property that cannot be accommodated in the Project design, and the
proposed Vacation of Right-of-Way will not preclude public access through the project.
8. The discharge of waste resulting from the Project into the existing sewer system would
not result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region because the use is connected to the
public sanitary sewer system,which is treated by a regional waste water facility.
9. The design of the map provides, to the extent feasible, for passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities. To the extent feasible buildings are located with a combination of
southerly, easterly and westerly exposures for maximum solar orientation during the
winter months, and trees will be planted to provide shading during the summer months.
10. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and
improvements conform to the regulations of the Zoning Code, and the regulation of any
public agency having jurisdiction by law. The Project is consistent with the requirements
of the Barton Road Specific Plan regarding lot assembly, street frontage and reciprocal
parking provisions. The tentative map demonstrates that proposed development can be
supported with the incorporation of development incentives as permitted by the Barton
Road Specific Plan. It is consistent with the minimum size requirements for the AP zone
district. The Project proponent has been conditioned to comply with state and local
development requirements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Tentative Parcel Map No. 08-02 (TPM No. 19131) is
hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
General Conditions of Approval:
1. This approval is granted based on the application materials submitted by Dr. Robert Ha,
represented by David Leonard Associates on August 27, 2008, including the tentative
parcel map dated December 11, 2008. All plans shall be consistent in terns of property
lines, easement location and dimensions and other measurements.
2. This approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this
resolution. This approval shall become null and void if a final map has not been timely
filed pnor to the expiration date in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision
Map Act. An extension of time may be granted by the Community and Economic
Development Director upon submittal of a time extension request and appropriate filing
fees. In granting any such time extension the City may impose new conditions and
Page 3 of 7
21
standards on the tentative map, pursuant to Section 66452.6(e) of the California
Government Code.
3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand Terrace and
its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside,
void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Grand Terrace
concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of
approval of the Planning Commission, City Council or Community and Economic
Development Director, which action is brought within the time period provided for in
Government Code Section 66499.37. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any
claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in
the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its
own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of
the matter.
4. Details shown on the tentative tract map are not necessarily approved. Any details
which are inconsistent with requirements of state and local ordinances, conditions of
approval, or City policies must be specifically approved in the final map or
improvement plan approvals
5. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
6. In.the event that exhibits and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions
shall prevail.
7. This approval shall not become effective until and unless the City Council approves the
Vacation of Right-of-Way for a portion of Britton Way.
8. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the
applicant must sign and return an "Acceptance of Conditions" form. The form and
content shall be prepared by the Community and Economic Development Department.
9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Director of Building and
Safety/Public Works, including the conditions of approval contained in the Director's
memorandum dated December 10, 2008, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire
Department, Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the
conditions of approval contained in their letter dated September 8, 2008, attached hereto
attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
11. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the
project, attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
Page 4of7
Q�
Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval:
12. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the
applicant must agree to and sign the "Acceptance of Conditions" form. The content of
the form to be prepared by the Community and Economic Development Department.
13. Provide a"will serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company.
14. Corner monuments indicating the new property corners shall be set in accordance with
�) the California Subdivision Map Act, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Appropriate documentations that the monuments have been set must be submitted to the
City Engineer.
15. A final parcel map prepared by, or under the direction of a registered civil engineer
authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor, must be processed
through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder.
16. The applicant shall submit a preliminary title report and subdivision guarantee showing
all fee interest holders, all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee, all trust
deeds, together with the names of the trustee and all easement holders. The account for
this title report shall remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County
Recorder. No easements shall be granted and recorded until after the final map is
recorded, unless approved by the City Engineer and subordinated to any City easements
by a certification upon the title sheet of the final map,prior to the grant.
17. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the
project boundaries. In the case where easements are proposed to be abandoned, the
applicant shall obtain abandonment of said easements from the affected easement
holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned
accordingly and as approved by the City.
18. Easements for all on-site facilities, public and private, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer prior to recordation. Such easements may include, but are not
limited to, sewer, water, electric, gas, telephone, storm drains, detention basins, and
landscaping
19. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map.
20. Prior to final map approval, all on-site and off-site curbs, gutters, paving, street lights,
sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be
installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee
their installation.
21. Prior to final map approval, plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall
be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider
shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that
Page 5 of 7
Q�
the subdivider has entered into z contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment
and installation of the water improvements.
22. Prior to the final map approval, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a
statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire
Department's fire flow requirements.
23. Improvement plans for utility connections and services, including water, fire hydrant
and/or fire sprinklers, sewer, storm drain, gas, electric, phone, and television, shall be
submitted to and approved by the City
24. Access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over private
drives within the development for all City vehicles, including police, fire, and other
emergency vehicles. The document(s) recording this access shall be prepared by the
applicant for review and approval by the City Engineer,prior to recordation.
25. The applicant shall record an easement over Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 proposed with
Tentative Parcel Map 08-02 for proposed reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and
parking crossing lot lines. Prior to recordation, easement documents shall be submitted
to the City Engineer for review and approval. (ENG)
26. Easements for all on-site facilities, public and private, shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer prior to recordation. Such easements may include, but are not
limited to, sewer, water, electric, gas, telephone, storm drains, detention basins, and ~
landscaping.
27. The applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) for the
commercial center and submit the CC&R's to the City for review and approval. The
CC&R's shall include provisions for the maintenance of common area improvements
including landscaping, perimeter fencing, infrastructure improvements, and parking
areas; and structural BMP's identified in the WQMP. The CC&R's shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Map, and the applicant shall be responsible for all City
Attorney costs regarding review of said CC&R's. .
28. The final map shall depict reciprocal access with- the property to the west of the site,
identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0275-251-16.
29. The striping plan shall address the eastbound left turn into Project Access 1 from Barton
Road. While there is an existing two-way left turn lane in this area, some modification
of the existing striping westerly of the project site- may be necessary to address the
project driveway, particularly given the transition from the two way left turn to lane to
the raised median which begins just east of this access.
Page 6 of 7
oA
Conditions After Final Map Approval:
30. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and one (1) Mylar copy of the filed
map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits.
31. The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and
conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, wall plans,
and building elevations.
32. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply with the
regulations of the City's Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.108 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code.
33. In the event of an unforeseen encounter of subsurface materials suspected to be of
archaeological or paleontological significance, all grading or excavation shall cease in
the immediate area, and the find left untouched until a qualified professional
archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever is appropriate, is contacted and called in to
evaluate the find and make recommendations as to disposition, mitigation, and/or
salvage. The applicant shall be liable for costs associated with the professional
investigation. (PLN)
34. All perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco,
split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials
of the project.
35. The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at the time that
construction permits are issued by the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California at a regular meeting held on the 10t`h day of February 2009.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof
Approved as to form:
John Harper
City Attorney
Page 7 of 7
Q�
Exhibit 1
Building and Safety/Public Works Department Conditions of ApPREt
IVED
Date: December 10,2008 DEC 10 2008
Applicant: Barton Circle, LLC. Dr.,Robert Ha DmI9PM6tDepwhn Econoulft
Site Location: Barton Square,Northwest Corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon
Avenue. Y
W.O. 0 124-34509 SA 08-09, CUP 08-05, E- 0"3
Provide four(4) construction plans and information for review of the proposed project. Below is
a list of the plans and documents needed for plan review. The initial plan review usually will take
three weeks on most projects. You have received work order number 12-8-5450, for the
Proposed Project. This number will be needed to obtain information regarding your plan review.
A plan review fee and permit fee will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to
issue.
Provide the following sets of plans and documents.
Publk WOrks/EnzWeering submittal's reauked at/lrst plan review.
(2) Parcel Map 19131
(2) Title Reports
(1) Grant Deed showing all easements.
(2) Street Utility Plans
(1) Street Water Plans.
(1) Street Sewer Plans.
(2) Storm Water Plans
(1) Dedications of right of way prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer.
(4) Street improvement plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer.
(1) Street Vacation Application,(Britton Way)
(2) Proposed utility easement documents for Britton Way vacation.
Ruildinr and Safety submittal's required at fkw plan review for Back buMding
(4) Architectural Plans
(4) Structural Plans
(2) Structural Calculations
(4) Plot/Site Plans
(4) Electrical Plans
(4) Electrical Load Calculations
(4) Plumbing Plans/isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas
l
RF
(4) Mechanical Plans
(4) Mechanical Duct Layout Plans
(2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans
(2) Title 24 Energy Calculations
(4) Precise Grading Plan
(2) Water Quality Management Plan,(WQMp)and Erosion Control Plan
(2) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, (SWPPp)
(2) Soils reports that includes percolation information for any proposed storm water facility.
J� Bnildins•& SaLdylPablk Works General Infornwdon
All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2007 California Building Code, 2007
California Mechanical Code, 2007 California Plumbing Code,and the 2007 California Electrical
Code adopted by the State of California and the City of Grand Terrace.
All construction work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino
County Public Works Standards and the City of Grand Terrace Specifications for Construction
Within Public Right of Way.
The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy.
Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department The
final building inspection from Building & Saf department and division prior to requesting a
Building& Safety Job Card. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the
Building tit Safety ety inspection requests and Public Works inspection guests can be Horde twenty four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may
also request inspections at the Building tit Safety public counter.
All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening.
encing and
screening shall be maintained at all times. The city right of way next to nstruction site shall
be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians.
Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers. Toilet facilities shall be maintained in
a sanitary condition at all times. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer type shall
conform at ANSI ZA.3.
All construction materials which are not used shall be recycled. Receipts from the recycled
company responsible for accepting the materials shall be kept in the construction office for
viewing by the City Inspector. Copies of the recycle receipts shall be given to the City Inspector.
Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit
from Building tit Safety. No temporary electrical power will be
lace and a granted to a project unless one
of the following items are in
P approved by Building 8t Safety.
(A) Installation of a construction trailer. or,
(B) Security fenced and screened area where the electrical power will be located.
2
R7
Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be
located in the public street right of way.
Construction vehicles and construction workers vehicles shall be parked on site at all times.
Work hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. or sundown.
Public Works and EAwineerins•Conditions
1. The applicant shall pay all development impact fees prior to obtaining Grading permits.
2. All on site utilities are required to be underground to all new proposed structures.
3. Performance Labor and Materials Bonds are required before work begins in the right of
way.
4. All proposed public street improvements shall be designed by persons registered and
licensed pursuant to the Business and Professions Code.
5. The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing and proposed public improvements
on Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue to include any required improvements to
Britton Way. The missing public improvements shall include, but are not limited to,
Pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, comer ramps, cross gutters and
street light and all necessary right of way construction.
6. Curb return radius at all entrances and exit driveways shall be set at 35—feet minimum.
The curb radius at the northwest comer of Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue can
be reduced to no less than 15 feet to accommodate a disabled ramp and a building
structural column in this area. Creative disabled ramp designs can be proposed to allow
for a greater radius above 15 foot on this comer. All traffic sight lines shall be checked
against San Bernardino County Transportation Department Standards.
7. Developer shall purchase and install Opticom devises on any new traffic signal light.
8. In the event the traffic impact analysis or the traffic engineer requires a traffic signal,
signal activation devices shall be placed within the entrance and exit driveways, the
public right of way shall be notched to include devices. All disabled ramp areas at any
public curb return shall be entirely within public right of way using similar notch
configurations.
9. Existing disabled ramp and radius on the northwest comer of Mount Vernon and Barton
shall be upgraded to comply with current standards and ADA requirements.
10. Applicant shall obtain and submit a street vacation application from the Public Works
Department Street vacation process will take ten to twelve weeks, (attached).
It. Street work performed on Mount Vernon Avenue will be required to incorporate
petromate underpayment prior to paving repairs. All street repairs and work in the public
right of way shall be in accordance with the City of Grand Terrace paving Policy.
12. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Circulation Element, a landscaped median is
required on Barton Road from Mount Vernon Avenue west to the projects limits. The
median will be constructed with an opening west of the median to allow full turning
access in and out of the projects westerly driveway. The City reserves the right to study
movements generated from the westerly driveway in the event the City finds that this area
has encounter vehicular movement problems.
3
QI
13. Applicant shall make all necessary public right of way improvements as required by,-the
City Traffic Engineer.
14. Submit Tentative Parcel Map 19131, and all standard engineering conditions of approval
used by the City.
15. Submit storm drain alteration plans for the existing storm drain in Britton Way.
Budding Permit Conditions
1. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, on site water service shall be installed and
approved by the responsible agency. On site Fire Hydrants shall be approved by the Fire
Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the Fire Hydrants
are established and approved.
2. Prior to issuance of permits, site grading and pad certifications shall be submitted to
Building dt Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor
elevations and set backs of structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structures
are in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany
pad certifications.
3. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, provide a certificate from the Colton Joint Unified
JSchool District stating that all school fees have been paid.
4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits,provide Building 8t Safety with a will service letter
from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909) 825-4128.
5. Pay all required State storm water fees and provide copy of payment along with the
Notice of Intent prior to grading permits.
6. Prior to demolition of existing buildings on the proposed site, provide asbestos and lead
paint reports from a licensed hygienist for Building and Safety review. Notify South
Coast Air Quality Management with necessary documentation prior to start of building
demolition.
7. All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Systems (NPDES). NPDES reports shall be submitted with project plans at time of plan
review.
4
89
COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Pusuci Exhibit 2
�CA 41M V- SERVIL-- -••_--
OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
PAT A. DENNEN
Community Safety Division Fire Chief
620 South"E"Street-San Bernardino,CA 9241E-0179 l�, County Fire Warden
(909)386-840-(MIS)38641M-(909)386-64M
Fax(909)386-8460
SEPTEMBER 8,2008 EXPIRATION: SERUM-KCIEW-PAID
BARTON PLAZA SEP -8 2008
DR.ROBERT HA Community Jt Economic
Devolopment Dgmztneat
FILE: CUP GT08f29001
LOCATION: BARTON RD A VERNON AVE-GRAND TERRACE
PROJECT TYPE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-3 BLDGS
NUMBER OF LOTS(H applicable): N/A
APN:
PLANNER INDEX:SPR 08-09,CUP 08-05,TPM 08-03
PLANNER: SANDRA MOLINA
Dear Applicant:
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, the San Bernardino County Fire
Department requires the following fire protection measures to be provided in accordance with applicable local
ordinances,codes,and/or recognized fire protection standards.
The following information of this document sets forth the FIRE CONDITIONS and STANDARDS of which are applied r,
to this project.
FIRE GONDl71®N3a
Jurisdlction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department
herein ("Fire Department'). Prior to any constnection occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire
Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current
Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes,codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department.
[F-1J
Additional Reauiremsnts. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other on site and off site improvements
may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after
more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. [11-1s]
Fire Eauloment-AareementiSurety. The applicant shall execute an agreement with the County of San Bernardino,
(if applicable- San Bernardino County Redevelopment Agency) and the Fire Department, to ensure that all fire
equipment necessary to serve the project is available when necessary or the applicant may submit surety in a form
and amount acceptable to County Counsel and the Fire Chief. (F-7]
Access Requirements. The applicant shall submit emergency/evacuation road access plans to the Fire Department
for review and approval. These plans shall include: (check all that apply). [F-9]
Primary Access Routs. The plan shall show all planned road widening with minimum widths of twenty-six
feet (26') unobstructed [FS1/FS2/FS3 NO shoulder parking allowed, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of no less
than 14 feet 6 inches(14'6"), and with grades not exceeding twelve percent(12%).
❑ Secondary Access Routs. The plan shall show all planned road widening with minimum widths of twenty
feet (20') unobstructed, with NO shoulder parking allowed, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of no less than 14
feet 6 inches (14'6"),and with grades not exceeding twelve percent(12%).
all
CUP GTO8129001
SEPTEMBER 8,2008
PAGE 2
❑ Road Width VarlancetTurnouts, The plan shall show required turnouts as mitigation for the requested
variance to allow road widths to be no less than feet in width and for len
lieu of the required minimum width of (26) feet for primary access and twenty feet(20 four seco ex ceedndary amass]tThe
turnouts shall be a minimum 6 feet wide and 40 feet long and shall be installed approximately every six hundred(600)
feet along the reduced segment of the roadway. These turnouts are to be designed, spaced and constricted as
determined by the Fire Department. The turnouts are to be located at all fire hydrants and at any othint
determined necessary for fire protection or other emergency response purpose, er po
❑ Planned width and location of all internal access drives and parking areas.
❑ Written verification of legal access to the project site (and each phase) from the County
maintained road for both the primary and secondary access routes.
❑ Other (list)
A=922 The development shall have a minimum of 2 points of vehicular access.
Theequipment access and for evacuation routes. St nand gtY2 2 1 � for fire✓emergency
Single Story Road Access Width:
All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty six (26)
foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may
be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions.
Mutts-Story Road Access Width:
`Buildings three(3)stories in height or more shall have a minimum access of thirty(30)feet unobstructed width and
vertically to fourteen(14)feet six(6)inches in height.[F-411
Private Road Maintenance. For all tracts andlarge developments the
roads and/or fire access roads to the Fire Department. The applicant shall submit plans for all private
applicant shall construct and maintain all such roads. In
addition, the applicant shall provide to the Fire De
partment a signed maintenance agreement as detailed in the
General Requirement conditions (Fire #IF-9) for ongoing road maintenarxxi and snow removal (where applicable).
This shall include all primary and secondary access routes that are not otherwise maintained agency.
Standard 902.2.1 IF-47J by a public
Water System COMMOrcliell. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire
system shall be operational, prior to Department is required. The
minimum of one new six (6)inch fire hydrant assembly with stared
two and oneone half ilicant nch and one required t(1provide
our 4
inch outlet. All fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred 300 feet ) ( )
vehicular travel-ways)and no more than one hundred f' ( ) t (� measured along
iffy(150)feet from any portion of a stricture. [F 54)
Water System Certiflc adon. The applicant'shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water
company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water
system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing
combustible materials on the job-site. [F-S7)
Fire Sprinkler-NFPA #13 An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Pamphlet #k13 and the Fire
Department standards is required. The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire sprinkler contractor. The
fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval.
The plans (minimum 11ir scale) shall include hydraulic calculations and manufactures specification sheets. The
contractor shall submit plans showing type of storage and use with the
fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. Standard 1 M.1 [F-591
applicable protection system. The required
91
i
I
CUP GT08/29001
SEPTEMBER 8,2008
PAGE 3 I
Fire Alarm. An automatic monitoring fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA and all
applicable codes is required for 100 heads or more.The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire alarm
contractor. The fire alarm contractor shall submit three(3)sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and
approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. Standard 1007.1.1 FA. [F-62]
Hood And Duct Suppression. An automatic hood and duct fire extinguishing system is required. A Fire Departma',
approved designer/installer shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans (minimum lAr scale) with manufacture
specification sheets to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan
submittal. (F-65]
Street Sian. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall
be installed on the nearest street comer to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible
material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the
permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 1[F72]
Hydrant Marking. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by
the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non-paved roads exist. the blue reflective hydrant marker
shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three(3)feet from the hydrant and at least
six(6)feet high above the adjacent road. Standard 901.4.3. [F80]
Commercial Addressing. Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq. it or less shall have the street
address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum six (6) inches in height and with a three quarter(3/4)
inch stroke. The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall b--
electrically illuminated (internal or extemaQ. Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadwal
additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.
Standard 901.4.4[F82]
Key Box. An approved Fire Department key box is required. The key box shall be provided with a tamper switch and
shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In commercial, industrial and multi-
family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock. Standard 902.4[F85]
Fire Extinguishers. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be
approved by the Fire Department. [F68]
Fire Lanes. The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs
shall be painted red. The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads in accordance with the
approved plan. Standard 901.4[F93]
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
1) Vegitation management to provide minimum twenty six(26)feet width and fourteen(14)feet six (6) inches
height clearances for fire apparatus access roads.
2) Any planned roof top solar energy generating system will require a separate submittal to fire department for
approval.
Sincerely,
MARK ANDERSON, Fire Prevention Specialist
San Bernardino County Fire Department
Community Safety Division
MA:wc
EXH
IBJL � 3 -'
MITIGATION MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM CHECKLIST
Project File Name: Barton Plaza Project Applicant: Dr. Robert Ha
Prepared by: City of Grand Terrace Date: December 2008
Verified
Mollilorill" Tinlill- of, NICtilod of, Date/ Sanctions for Non-
Milioation NIC.l."111-C No. For
Initials ('0111pliance
I fliplelliell till- Action Mollilorill" Fl_L'(JllC'llCV Verification Verification
•
x'-
rx
GEOLOGY
GEO-1: The design and construction Building Prior to Prior to Review of Withhold Building
of all structures and facilities within Official or Construction issuance of construction Permit
the project limits shall be in designee Building documents
accordance with the regulations and Permit
recommendations established by the
City of Grand Terrace, applicable
and appropriate measures identified
in the Uniform Building Code,
and/or the site-specific geotechnical
investigation prepared for the
proposed project.
Method of Date/ Sanctions for Non-
Implementing Action Monitoring FIT(ILICIIQ Verificatiml Verification Initials
TRANSPORTATION
TR.A.NS-01 Prior to the issuance of Building Pnor to Prior to Evidence of Withhold Grading
grading permits, the project Official or grading issuance of payment of Permit
proponent shall participate in a fair- designee Grading Pernut required fees
share contribution, via the payment submitted to
of traffic signal impact fees, for the City.
installation of a traffic signal at the
study area intersections of:
a. Mount Vernon Avenue/Grand
Terrace Road;
b. Mount Vernon Avenue/Van
Buren Avenue, and
c. Mount Vernon Avenue/Main
Street.
fl r
Veriticd
Impleniciithig Actioii N loll itori lit, FrUtIticlicy Verificlition Verification fififials Compliance
TRANS-02 Prior to the issuance of Building Prior to Prior to Evidence of Withhold Grading
grading permits, the project Official or grading issuance of payment of Permit
proponent shall participate in a fair- designee Grading Permit required fees
share funding, via the payment of submitted to
arterial improvement fees, for City
construction of.
a. An additional southbound left-
turn lane at the 1-215 southbound
ramps intersection with Barton
Road: and
b. An additional eastbound through
lane at the Barton Road
intersection with the I-215
northbound ramps.
These improvements shall require
widening the Barton Road bridge
deck of 1-215 to provide two through
lanes in the eastbound direction
between the 1-215 southbound and
northbound ramps.
Responsible Vel led r Non-
Mitigation Nle-asUI'e 'No'. fi)r Mollitorino Timing of Metllod of Date/ Sanctions fo
I 111plenlen ti wt, Action Monitorino FrCtIllency Verification Verific"Ition Initials Compliance
TRANS-03 Prior to the issuance of Building Prior to Prior to Evidence of Withhold Grading
grading permits, the project Official or grading issuance of payment of Permit
proponent shall participate in a fair- designee Grading Permit required fees
share funding, via payment of submitted to
arterial improvement fees, for City.
construction of:
a. An additional northbound left-
turn lane and exclusive
eastbound right-turn lane at the
Michigan Avenue/Barton Road
intersection; and
b. A right-turn overlap phase for
the eastbound right-turn
movement shall be added to the
signal operations at the Michigan
Avenue/Barton Road
intersection.
D
n
Responsible Verified
NOn
1111plenienfinu Action 11onitorillo FIT(Jilullc% Verification Verification Initials Compliance
TRANS-04 Prior to the issuance of City Engineer Prior to Prior to Concurrence Withhold Grading
grading permits, the project or designee grading issuance of by the City Permit
proponent shall provide evidence to Grading Permit that the
the City that the following required
improvements have been included in improvements
construction plans: are
appropriately
a. Construction left-turn pocket included in
with storage for at least two construction
vehicles south of Britton Way; documents.
and
b Complete half-section
improvements to Mount Vernon
Avenue and Barton Road
adjacent to the project.
LO
V
Implenientino Action
TRANS-05 Prior to the issuance of City Engineer Prior to Prior to Concurrence Withhold Grading
grading permits, the project or designee grading issuance of by the City Permit
proponent shall provide evidence to Grading Pernut that the
the City that the following required
improvements and standards have improvements
been included in construction plans: are
appropnately
a. Project Access 1/Barton Road included in
allowance of a break in the construction
median to allow left turns into documents.
project site;
b. Project Access 2/Barton Road is
restricted to right-in/right-out
access;
c. Project Access 3/Mount Vernon
Avenue is restricted to right-
in/right-out access
d. A 50 foot left-turn pocket at
Project Access 1/Barton Road if
a raised median along Barton
Road is constructed west of
Project Access 1.
e. A left turn pocket for vehicles
traveling north on Mount Vernon
Avenue south of the intersection
with Britton Way. The left turn
pocket shall be of sufficient
length to accommodate at least
0
Responsible Verified
No. fi)r Mollitorin" Thilillu of Method Of Date/ Sanctions for Non-
Implementing Action A1011itorilig FretweiicY Verification Verification Initials Compliance
two vehicles (50 feet) and is
recommended to be back-to-back
with the existing left-turn lane on
Mount Vernon Avenue/Barton
Road.
f. Sight distance at all project
access points should be reviewed
with respect to Caltrans and City
of Grand Terrace sight distance
standards at the time of
preparation of final grading,
landscape, and street
improvements;
g. Install stop signs, stop bars, and
stop legends at all project access
points; and
h. Internal traffic signing/stnping
should be implemented in
conj unction with detailed
construction plans for the
project.
to
Responsible 11 o t, Method of Date/ Sanctions for Non-
1"0 r o I I i I o 1,i n Tinii
Mitigation Measure No. CV Verification Verification Initials Compliance
1111plenientint, -kction Monitorino Frequen
Y,
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES- '
Building During Prior to the Submittal of Withhold grading
BIO-01 Removal of existing on-site issuance of evidence to City permits and/or stop work
trees must be conducted outside the Official or construction order for grading
avian nesting season (February designee grading that a pre-
through August). If construction permits construction nest operations
occurs during the avian nesting survey(if
season, the project applicant shall required) has
provide evidence to the City that a been conducted
pre-construction nesting bird survey and the inclusion
has been conducted within 7 days in construction
prior to any ground disturbance documents of
activities. If birds are found to be appropriate
nesting inside or within 250 feet(500 measures to
feet for raptors) of the area of satisfy the intent
constraint, the nest or nesting tree of this measure.
plus a 250-foot buffer must be
flagged and avoided until it is
determined by a qualified biologist
that active nesting no longer is
occurring.
Verified
Mitigatioll Measure No. r f)I I i I o r i I I Timill" of' Method ot, Date/ Sanctimis for Non-
Impleniewhig Actimi Mollitorim, Frc(jijuiicN Verilicatioll Verificatimi lifitials Compliance
HAZA"S
HAZ-01 Prior to the initiation of City Building Prior to Prior to the Submittal to the Withhold demolition
demolition activities, the applicant and Safety initiation of issuance of City of evidence permit
shall provide evidence to the City Official or demolition demolition of notification
that contractors and subcontractors designee permits required to
conducting work in the affected satisfy the intent
structures have been appropriately of this measure
notified to the presence and location
of ACM and have been informed that
disturbance of ACM is prohibited.
HAZ-02 Prior the demolition of the City Building Prior to Prior to Submittal to the Stop work order for
on-site structures, the applicant shall and Safety demolition demolition of City of evidence further demolition
provide evidence to the City that Official or structures that hazardous activities and/or citation
ACM has been appropriately designee materials have
removed and disposed of The been
removal of any on-site ACM shall be appropriately
performed by a certified and licensed disposed of per
asbestos abatement contractor. All applicable
removal, disposal, and handling of regulations.
any ACNI shall be in accordance
with current federal, State, and local
agency ordinances, laws, and
regulations.
Verified
Frequency N'Crification Verification Initials
HAZ-03 The City shall be City Planning Prior to Prior to Submittal of Withhold grading
immediately notified in the event Official or grading and issuance of evidence to City permits
malodorous or discolored soils, designee during grading that the
liquids, containers, or other materials construction permits construcnon
known or suspected to contain documents
hazardous materials and/or include
contaminants are encountered during appropriate
on-site demolition, grading and measures to
construction. Earthmoving activities satisfy the intent
in the vicinity of said material shall of this measure
be halted until the extent and nature
of the suspect material is determined
by qualified personnel (as
determined by the City). The
removal and/or disposal of any such
contaminants shall be in accordance
with all applicable local, state, and
federal standards.
NOISE
NOS-01 During all project site Building Throughout During grading On-site Stop work order and/or
excavation and grading on site, the Official or construction and inspection citation
project contractors shall equip all designee construction
construction equipment, fixed or activities
mobile, with properly operating and
maintained mufflers consistent with
manufacturers' standards.
J /
J
Responsible Veritled
Mitioation Measure No. Jor N I o it i(o r i I I Till1ing of Method ol, Date/ Sanctions for Non-
1111plellielltill- Actioll N loll ito rill" I;re(ItlellcN Verification Verilleatioll Initials Compliance
NOS-02 The project contractor shall Building Throughout During grading On-site Issuance of a Stop Work
place all stationary construction Official or construction and inspection Order and/or citation
equipment so that emitted noise is designee construction
directed away from sensitive activities
receptors nearest the project site.
NOS-03 The construction contractor Building Throughout During grading On-site Issuance of a Stop Work
shall locate equipment staging in Official or construction and inspection Order and/or citation
areas that would create the greatest designee construction
distance between construction- activities
related noise sources and noise-
sensitive receptors nearest the project
site during all project construction.
NOS-04 On-site construction Building Throughout During grading On-site Issuance of a Stop Work
activities shall be restricted to the Official or construction and inspection Order and/or citation
hours permitted under the City's designee construction
Noise Ordinance. The Noise activities
Ordinance limits construction
activities between the hours of 7:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and
Saturdays.
N
Initials Compliance
Fretillellc\ Verification Verification
NOS-05 A four-foot shielding wall Building Prior to Prior to On-site Issuance of a Stop Work
shall be constructed along the Official or Occupancy Occupancy inspection Order and/or citation
northern portion of the west side of designee
the fresh & Easy building loading
dock to reduce the impact of
operational noise from the loading
dock on the residential sensitive
receptors to the northwest of the
project.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-01 In the event that a City Planner or Throughout Prior to Submittal of Issuance of a Stop Work
paleontological, archeological, designee construction issuance of evidence to City Order and/or citation
and/or historical resource are grading that the
uncovered during the course of the permits construction
construction phase of the project, documents
ground disturbing activities in the include
vicinity of the find should be appropriate
redirected until the nature and extent measures to
of the find can be evaluated by a satisfy the intent
qualified archaeologist and/or of this measure
paleontologist (as determined by the
City). Any such resource uncovered -
during the course of project-related
to grading or construction shall be
recorded and/or removed per
applicable City and/or State
regulations.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING CHAPTER
15.09.20 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, TITLE 15 CHAPTERS
15.09.20 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
REPAIRS OF DAMAGED STRUCTURES.
The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Title 15, Chapter 15.09.20 of the City of Grand Terrace Municipal
Code is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 15.09.20, AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA EXISTING
BUILDING CODE.
Chapter 15.09.30,ADOPTION AND INTENT
This chapter establishes regulations as amended to the building code for the expeditious
repair of damaged structures. In the event an amendment to the California Building
Standards Code result in differences between these building standards and the California
Building Standards Code, the text of these building standards shall govern. In
accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 express findings that
l modifications to the California Building Standards Code are reasonably necessary
because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions are either already on file
with the California Building Standards Commission, or will be filed prior to the effective
date of ordinance codified in this article. In accordance with California Government
Code Section 50022.6, at least one true copy of the California Building Code has been on
file with the City Clerks office fifteen (15) days prior to enactment of the ordinance
codified in this Article. While this Article is in force, a true copy of this Chapter shall be
kept for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk. A reasonable supply of this
Chapter shall be available in the office of the City Clerk for public purchase.
Chapter 15.09.40, DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this chapter, the following definition applies and is hereby added to
Section 3402.1 Definitions of the 2007 California Building Code (CBC):
Substantial Structural Damage. A condition where:
1. In any story, the vertical elements of the lateral-force-load resisting
system, have suffered damage such that the lateral load-carrying capacity
of the structure in any direction has been reduced by more than 20 percent
from its pre-damaged condition, or
2. The capacity of any vertical gravity load-carrying component, or any
group of such components, that support more than 30 percent of the total
I COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 7h
area of the structure's floor(s) and roofs) has been reduced more than 20
percent from i'ts pre-damaged condition, and the remaining capacity of
such affected elements with respect to all dead and live loads is less than
75 percent of that required by the building code for new buildings of
similar structure, purpose, and location.
Chapter x ° .09.50 REPAIRS
For the pu -{use of this chapter, the Following repair requirements are hereby added as a
new Subs. ion 3403.5 to 3403 Additions, Alterations or Repairs in the 2007 California f
Building ( le(CBC).
3403.5.1 ir'. t)airs. Repairs of structural elements shall comply with this section.
3403.5.1.1 Lismic evaluation and design. Seismic evaluation and design of an existing
building ai its components shall be based on the following criteria.
3403.5.1.1. Evaluation and design procedures. The seismic evaluation and design
shall be b ;ed on the procedures specified in the building code, ASCE 31 Seismic
Evaluatior: ,."Existing Buildings (for evaluation only) or ASCE 41 Seismic Rehabilitation
of Existing Buildings. The procedures contained in Appendix A of the International
Existing Bij.-Ving Code shall be permitted to be used as specified in Section 3403.5.1.1.3.
3403.5.1.1.1 CBC level seismic forces. When seismic forces are required to meet the
building cor;;: level,they shall be one of the following:
1. 100 percent of the values in the building code. The R factor used
for analysis in accordance with Chapter 16 of the code shall be the
R factor specified for structural systems classified as "Ordinary"
unless it can be demonstrated that the structural system satisfies the
proportioning and detailing requirements for systems classified as
"Intermediate" or"special".
2. Forces corresponding to BSE-1 and BSE-2 Earthquake Hazard
Levels defined in ACSE 41. Where ASCE 41 is used, the
corresponding performance levels shall be those shown in Table
3403.5.1.1.2.
2
TABLE 3403.5.1.1.2
ASCE 41 AND ASCE 31 PERFORMANCE LEVELS
OCCUPANCY CATICORY PERFORMANCE LEVEL FOR USE WITH PEFORMANCE LEVEL FOR USE
(BASED ON IBC TABLE ASCE 31 AND WITH ASCE 41 BSE-1 WITH ASCE 41 BSE -2
1604.5) EARTHQUAKE EARTHQUAKE HAZARD LEVEL
HAZARD LEVEL
I Life Safety(LS) Collapse Prevention(CP)
11 Life Safety(LS) Collapse Prevention(CP)
III Note(a) Note(a)
IV Immediate Occupancy(10) Life Safety(LS)
a. Performance Levels for Occupancy Category III shall be taken as halfway between the performance levels specified for
Occupancy Category 11 and Occupancy Category IV.
3403.5.1.1.3 Reduced CBC level seismic forces. When seismic forces are permitted to
meet reduced code levels, they shall be one of the following:
1. 75 percent of the forces prescribed in the building code. The R factor used for
analysis in accordance with Chapter 16 of the building code shall be the R factor
used for factor as specified in Section 3403.5.1.1.2.
2. In accordance with the applicable chapters in Appendix A of the International
Existing Building Code as specified in Items 2.1 through 2.5 below. Structures or
portions of structures that comply with the requirements of the applicable chapter
in Appendix A shall be deemed to comply with the requirements for reduced
building code forces levels.
�i 2.1 The seismic evaluation and design of unreinforced masonry bearing wall
buildings in Occupancy Category I or II are permitted to be based on the
procedures specified in Appendix Chapter A I.
2.2 Seismic evaluation and design of the wall anchorage system in reinforced
concrete and reinforced masonry wall buildings with flexible diaphragms
in Occupancy Category I and II are permitted to be based on the
procedures specified in Appendix Chapter A2.
2.3 Seismic evaluation and design of cripple walls and sill plate anchorage in
residential buildings of light-framed wood construction in Occupancy
Category I and II are permitted to be based on the procedures specified in
Appendix Chapter A3.
2.4 Seismic evaluation and design of soft, weak, or open-front wall conditions
in multiunit residential buildings of wood construction in Occupancy
Category I and II are permitted to be based on the procedures specified in
Appendix Chapter A4.
2.5 Seismic evaluation and design of concrete buildings and concrete with
masonry infill buildings in all Occupancy Categories are permitted to be
based on the procedures specified in Appendix Chapter A5.
3. In accordance with ASCE 31 based on the applicable performance level as shown
in Table 3403.5.1.1.2.
3
4. Those associated with BSE-1 Earthquake Hazard Level defined in ASCE 41 and
the performance level as shown in Table 3403.5.1.1.2. Where ASCE 41 is used,
the design spectral response acceleration parameters Sxs and Sxi shall not be taken
less than 75 percent of the respective design spectral response acceleration
parameters Sys and SM defined by the International Building Code and its
reference standards.
3403.5.1.2 Wind design. Wind design of existing buildings shall be based on the
procedures specified in the building code. ,
3403.5.2 Repairs to damaged buildings. Repairs to damaged buildings shall comply
with this section.
3403.5.2.1 Unsafe conditions. Regardless of the extent of structural damage, unsafe
conditions shall be eliminated.
3403.5.2.2 Substantial structural damage to vertical elements of the force-resisting
systems. A building that has sustained substantial structural damage to the vertical
elements of its lateral-force-resisting system shall be evaluated and repaired in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 3403.5.2.2.1 through 3403.5.2.2.3.
3403.5.2.2.1 Evaluation. The building shall be evaluated by a registered design
professional, and the evaluation findings shall be submitted to the code official. The
evaluation shall establish whether the damaged building, if repaired to its pre-damaged (^1
state, would comply with the provisions of the building code. Seismic forces for this
evaluation are permitted to be the reduced level seismic forces specified in the code
Section 3403.5.1.1.3.
3403.5.2.2.2 Extent of repair for compliant buildings. If the evaluation established
compliance of the pre-damaged building in accordance with Section 3403.5.2.2.1, then
repairs shall be permitted that restore the building .to its pre-damaged state, using
materials and strengths that existed prior to the damage.
3403.5.2.2.3 Extent of repair for non-compliant buildings. If the evaluation does not
establish compliance of the pre-damage building; in accordance with Section
3403.5.2.2.1, then the building shall be rehabilitated to comply with applicable provisions
of the building code for load combinations including wind or seismic forces. The wind
design level for the repair shall be as required by the building code in effect at the time of
original construction unless the damage was caused by wind, in which case the design
level shall be as required by the code in effect at the of the original construction or as
required by the building code, whichever is greater. Seismic forces for this rehabilitation
design shall be those required for the design of the predamaged building, but not less than
the reduced level seismic forces specified in Section 3403.5.1.1.3. New structural
members and connections required by this rehabilitation design shall comply with the
detailing provisions of the building code for new buildings and similar structure, purpose,
and location.
4
3403.5.2.3 Substandard structural damage to vertical load-carrying components.
Vertical load-carrying components that have sustained substantial damage shall be
rehabilitated to comply with the applicable provisions for dead and live loads in the
building code. Undamaged vertical load-carrying components that receive dead or live
loads of the rehabilitation components shall also be rehabilitated to carry the design loads
of the rehabilitation design. New structural members and connections required by this
rehabilitation design shall comply with the detailing provisions of,the building code for
new buildings of similar structure, purpose, and location.
' 3403.5.2.3.1 Lateral force-resisting elements. Regardless of the level of damage to
vertical elements of the lateral force-resisting system, if substantial structural damage to
vertical load-carrying components was caused primarily by wind or seismic effects, then
the building shall be evaluated in accordance with Section 3403.5.2.2.1 and, if non-
compliant, rehabilitated in accordance with Section 3403.5.2.2.3.
3403.5.2.4 Less than substantial structural damage. For damage less than substantial
structural damage, repairs shall be allowed that restore the building to its pre-damaged
state, using materials and strengths that existed prior to the damage. New structural
members and connections used for this repair shall comply with the detailing provisions
of the building code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose, and location.
3403.5.3 Referenced Standards
Standard Referenced
Reference In Code
Number Title Section Number
ASCE 31-03 Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings 3403.5.1.1.1,
Table 3403.5.1.1.2,
3403.5.1.1.3
ASCE 41-06 Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings 3403.5.1.1.1,
3403.5.1.1.2,
3403.5.1.1.3
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 3. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the
27`h day of January, 2009, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of
said City Council on the 101h day of February, 2009.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
5
Attest:
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 10`h day of February, 2009, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John Harper, City Attorney
6