08/12/1993 .w....re FILE COPY
• LIT),
*A�a"!
August 12, 1993
22795 Barton Road r
Grand Terrace CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
`r California 92324-5295
l r
Civic Center
• (909) 824-6621
Fax(909)783-7629 Regular Meetings
2nd and 4th Thursday - 6:00 p.m.
Byron R Matteson
Mayor
Ronald M Christianson
Mayor Pro Tempore
0-4
Gene Carlstrom
Herman Hilkey
Jim Singley
Council Members
Thomas J Schwab
City Manager
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS August 12, 1993
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 P.M.
22795 Barton Road
* Call to Order -
* Invocation -
* Pledge of Allegiance -
* Roll Call -
STAFF COUNCIL
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
1. Approval of 07/08/93 and 7/26/93 Approve
Minutes
2. Approval of Check Register Nos. Approve
CRA072293 and CRA081293
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
_ JNVENE CITY COUNCIL
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Certificate of Commendation -
Frank Perez
B. Recycling Family of the Month -
June 1993
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consa,:t Calendar items
are expected to be routine & non-
controversial. They will be acted
upon by the Council at one time with-
out discussion. Any Councilmember,
Staff Member, or Citizen may request
removal of an item from the Consent
Calendar for discussion.
A. Approve Check Register Nos. 072293 Approve
and 081293
B. Ratify 08/12/93 CRA Action
COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF COUNCIL
08/12/93 - Page 2 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances
on Agenda
D. Approve 7/08/93 Minutes Approve
E. Bid Award - Senior Center Award
P. Release Bonds (La Mancha) Approve
G. Reject Liability Claim 93-03 Approve
(Melendez)
H. Reject Liability Claim 93-04 Approve
(City of Riverside)
I. Bid Award - Barton Road Award
J. Bid Award - Pico Park Award
K. Soliciting Permit (Kerrigan) Approve
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
5. ORAL REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
(1) Historical and Cultural
Committee
(a) Minutes of 7/5/93 Accept
(2) Emergency Operations Com-
mittee
(b) Minutes of 5/18/93 and Accept
3/16/93
B. Council Reports
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. -
A. FIRST READING - AN ORDINANCE OF Adopt
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE AMENDING TITLE 4
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ESTAB-
LISHING A COMPREHENSIVE SCHEDULE
FOR FEES, TAXES, AND FINES FOR
PERMITS, LICENSES, SERVICES,
FACILITIES, AND ACTIVITIES PRO-
VIDED BY THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE
B. Tentative Tract Map 88-02-R1 Approve
(Karger)
COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF COUNCIL
08/12/93 - Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
7 . UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Grand Terrace Chamber of Com-
merce Request for Temporary
Sign Enforcement Moratorium
B. Designation of Voting Delegate Appoint
for Annual League of California
Cities Conference
C. First Baptist Church Outdoor Approve
Festival
9. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURN
THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WILL BE HELD ON AUGUST 26, 1993 AT
6: 00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 8/26/93
MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO
THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 08/19/93 .
PENDING C R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JULY 8, 1993
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of
Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace
Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on July
8, 1993 at 7: 05 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman
Ronald Christianson, Vice-Chairman
Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member
Herman Hilkey, Agency Member
Jim Singley, Agency Member
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
Phil Bush, Finance Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
John Harper, City Attorney
Lt. Rodney Hoops, Sheriff's Department
ABSENT: Patrizia Materassi, Planning Director
APPROVAL OF 06/23/93 MINUTES
CRA-93-32 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the June 23 , 1993 CRA
Minutes.
APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA070893
CRA-93-33 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register No.
CRA070893
ADD PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT WITH THE COLTON
JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO THE AGENDA
CRA-93-34 MOTION BY CHAIRMAN MATTESON, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN
CHRISTIANSON, CARRIED 5-0, to add the Pass-Through
Agreement with the Colton Joint Unified School District
to the Agenda.
C R A AGENDA ITEM NO.1
CRA Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 2
PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE AND THE COLTON JOINT UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
CRA-93-35 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Pass-Through
Agreement between the City of Grand Terrace and the
Colton Joint Unified School District.
Chairman Matteson adjourned the regular CRA meeting at 7: 15 p.m. ,
until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled
to be held on Thursday, August 12 , 1993 at 6: 00 p.m.
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
PENDING C.R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - JULY 26, 1993
A joint special meeting of the City Council, the Community
Redevelopment Agency, and the Public Financing Authority of the
` City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,
Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace,
California, on July 26, 1993 at 9: 00 A.M.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor
Ronald Christianson, Mayor Pro Tempore
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Phil Bush, Finance Director
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT: Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
Patrizia Materassi, Planning Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Mayor Matteson convened Joint City Council,
Community Redevelopment Agency, and Public
Financing Authority meeting at 9: 00 A.M
1. Approving Documents Related to Bond Financing
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; spoke in the capacity as the Underwriter
for the bond financing. He indicated that the bond
documents, official statement, and all supporting
documentation were sent to three insurance
companies in both Moody's and Standard and Poor's.
He remarked that the documentation was sent to
apply for a rating and to qualify for bond
insurance. He expressed optimism that Capital
Guarantee and/or MBIA would provide an insurance
commitment that would result in a triple A rating
on the bonds. He commented further that his
company also applied for a rating from Moody's and
Standard and Poor's, adding that an analyst from S
& P would be at City Hall that morning. He advised
C R A AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Council/CRA/Public Financing Authority Minutes - 07/26/93
Page 2
the City to examine the merits of insuring the
bonds.
City Attorney Harper, stipulating a scenario
whereby the deal was already insured with a triple
A rating, inquired as to the interest rates for the
taxable and nontaxable bonds.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los (--`
Angeles; indicated that the current market rates,
in average interest costs over 25 years, would be 5
1/2% for the tax exempt bonds. He commented that
today's interest rates begin at about 3% in the
tax-free market. He remarked that the municipal,
taxable obligation would be between 80 and 100
points over the long-term treasury bonds and
speculated that the rate would be approximately 8%.
Mayor Matteson, questioned the distinction between
the taxable and nontaxable bonds.
City Attorney Harper, responded that the difference
resides in the use of the funds, explaining that
the refunding of the existing debt is tax free. He _
clarified further that the taxable portion is the
loan repayment. He indicated that the Internal
Revenue Service issued guidelines a few years
previously that precluded the Redevelopment Agency
from loaning money to a related agency in the same
city on a tax exempt basis.
Mayor Matteson, inquired as to the division between
the taxable and nontaxable obligation.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; replied that $5 million is tax exempt and
$8 million is taxable.
Mayor Matteson, questioned whether the bonds would
be sold at different rates.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; explained that there are two issuance
Series - one taxable and one tax exempt. He
commented further that the General Fund would no
longer be obligated for the City Hall financing
once the bonds are issued.
City Attorney Harper, clarified that the bonds were
originally issued as Certificates of Participation.
Council/CRA/Public Financing Authority Minutes - 07/26/93
Page 3
He explained that the Certificates are being
replaced with tax increment financing.
Mayor Matteson, inquired as to the rate the City
has been paying on the current loan.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; replied that the rate is 7 3/4%.
Mayor Matteson, questioned the overall cost to the
City to issue the bonds.
Mayor Pro Tem Christianson, commenting that the
City is borrowing $14 million and spending $5
million on City Hall financing and $2 1/2 million
paying the amount owed by the Redevelopment Agency,
inquired as to the distribution of the remaining $7
million.
City Manager Schwab, explained that the concept
behind the bond issue was to protect the
Redevelopment Agency in the event that the State
raided the unallocated tax increment. He remarked
that the $7 million is intended to bond the City's
debt capacity to the maximum amount available to
the Redevelopment Agency.
City Attorney Harper, stated that the issuance of
the bonds accomplishes the refunding of the
Certificates, protects the tax increment from the
State, allows the set-aside of a 20% pass-through,
which the City had been receiving from the
Redevelopment Agency over the past 10 years, adding
that the amount was over $1 million, provides for
the repayment of the loan from the City to the
Redevelopment Agency, and provides a taxable,
standing fund that will be available to the City.
Councilmember Sinalev, questioned whether the
available fund could be used to construct a
gymnasium.
City Manager Schwab, replied in the affirmative but
indicated that the operational costs of such a
facility would be prohibitive.
City Attorney Harper, indicated that the reserve
fund is slated for expenditure on the daily
operations of the City or the Redevelopment Agency
over the next ten years.
Council/CRA/Public Financing Authority Minutes - 07/26/93
Page 4
Mayor Matteson, questioned why the City was
acquiring $14 million when the debt obligation
totals only $7 million.
City Manager Schwab, clarified that originally the
bond issuance was begun to protect the City's tax
increment from the State. He explained that since
the debt will be bonded and the money will be
obligated to the debt, technically, no money would 1
be available for seizure by the State.
Mayor Matteson, expressed concern regarding the
future use of the funds.
City Attorney Harper, remarked that if the economy
improves, the money can be used for other purposes,
adding that the funds are normal tax allocation
bond proceeds that can be expended on any project. ,
He commented further that as the tax increment
increases, the City has the capacity to issue more
bonds.
Mayor Matteson, inquired as to the rate at which
the money has been invested.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that the rate is 4
1/2%.
City Attorney Harper, explained that the money is
not tax exempt, commenting that there are no rebate
restrictions on the funds
Mayor Pro Tem Christianson, expressed concern if
the State questions the City's fund protection
City Manager Schwab, assured Council that the
process is a legal contract and added that the
State cannot intervene.
City Attorney Harper, indicated that the State only
has access to tax revenue but commented that the ,
State can disband Redevelopment Agencies and
eliminate tax increment. He remarked that that
would not affect the current bond issuance but
added that the State could still acquire the money
if it were not obligated to the debt through the
issuance of the bonds.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; noted that the City of Cerritos has
Council/CRA/Public Financing Authority Minutes - 07/26/93
Page 5
similarly protected its funds by selling $80
million in taxable bonds and $40 million in tax
exempt bonds.
City Attorney Harper, indicated that even if the
State eliminates tax increment, the bond holder is
protected by insurance. He remarked that the
Agency is not obligated to pay any nonexistent
money through the tax increment.
Curt DeCrinis, Prager, McCarthy, & Sealy, Los
Angeles; reported that the sale of the taxable
bonds will cost the City $164, 000 while the tax
exempt bonds will cost $98, 000 for underwriting in
addition to $130, 000 for issuance. He commented
that the issuance cost is factored into the
Refunding Analysis.
City Attorney Harper, observed that the cost of
issuance will be distributed over 25 years. He
stated that Council will cast its vote in the joint
capacity as the Community Redevelopment Agency, the
Public Financing Authority, and the City Council.
CC-93-112 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CHRISTIANSON, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSTROM WAS ABSENT) , to adopt the joint Resolution of
the City of Grand Terrace, Community Redevelopment Agency
of Grand Terrace, and the Grand Terrace Public Financing
Authority, authorizing issuance of not to exceed
$14,000, 000 principal amount of Community Redevelopment
Agency of Grand Terrace, 1993 Refunding Tax Allocation
Bonds (Series "1993A") and (Series "1993B") , approving
and authorizing and directing execution of an Indenture
of Trust relating thereto, appointing a trustee,
approving official sLatement, approving a Purchase
Agreement, approving an Escrow Agreement and authorizing
official action.
Council/CRA/Public Financing Authority Minutes - 07/26/93
Page 6
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the Joint Special City Council,
Community Redevelopment Agency, and Public Financing
Authority Meeting at 9:25 a.m. , until the next regular
CRA/City Council Meeting, which is scheduled to be held
on Thursday, August 12, 1993 .
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
t I\
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO. 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27859 BANK OF AMERICA LEASE PAYMENT ON CIVIC CENTER $153,566 47
27865 GENE CARLSTROM STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 150 00
27867 RONALD CHRISTIANSON STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 150 00
27879 HERMAN HILKEY STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 150 00
27888 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 150 00
27914 JAMES SINGLEY STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 $ 150 00
TOTAL: $154, 316. 47
C) .3
m
z
I 01hTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE MMUNITY
REDEVELO(ENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPEND URES FOR
THE OPERGVION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
m n
z
33
APmm-
,PHIL BU "
ZU
FINANCE Z RECTOR 0
O
1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO. 081293.
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27945 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS MAIL
$ 9 00
27952 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES,REHABILITATION PROGRAM 731.00
27954 MORELAND AND ASSOCIATES RESTATE FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR 6/30/92 3,095 94
27959 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES, REHABILITATION PROGRAM AND 34 50
REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL
27969 UNITED STATES ESCROW CREDIT REPORT, REHABILITATION PROGRAM 6 00
TOTAL: $ 3,876.44
"D
31
I CERTIFY HAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF RE COMMUNITY
Ilr
REDEVELOPMENT NCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSAR1 AND APPROPRIATE EXPRIDITURES FOR
THE OPERATION THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
v 73
n a
/°/-,-, airK) 1)
PHIL BUSH
0
FINANCE DIRECTO.
G
o a
g, r
I J
s
1...:\]...
EIV_
G-c
City of Grand Terrace
Commendion
,,,_,)
FRANK PEREZ
WHEREAS, the safety and security of our community is dependent not
only on the dedicated service of professionals and volunteers, but also on the
vigilance of its citizens, and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 1993, your vigilance and courageous action
led to the arrest of an armed grand theft auto suspect who you had personally
detained and disarmed,
a NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R Matteson, Mayor of the City of
Grand Terrace, on behalf of the City Council and all law-abiding citizens of
this City, do hereby commend you for your actions and extend our sincerest
gratitude for the contribution you have made to the safety and security of our
community
~-' MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
,j ;owl*, �r lir and of the City Council thereof
itilie
'i GP A r► This 12th day of August, 1993
•3:
.,,ter. a,i
'60t #
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # a zyr:j::: 4
El .-"I'
J C
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
P9004 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/2/93 $ 138 62
P9005 LARRY MAINEZ PLANNING TECHNICIAN, 6/21-7/2/93 580. 57
P9006 RAGING WATERS TEEN CLUB EXCURSION 224 25
P9007 SARAH CAMPOBASSO PAYROLL ENDING 7/2/93 , OMITTED IN ERROR
ON REGULAR PAYROLL 101 14
P9008 DISNEYLAND CHILD CARE EXCURSION 2,720 00
P9009 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/8/93 617 75
P9010 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/8/93 89 33
P9011 n SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/12/93 106 51
O
P9012 Z BANK OF AMERICA DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT ON PFA BOND 24,832.71
P9013 ��-,� PERS RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 7/2/93 Z rn 4,821 47
P9014 C) r
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/13/93 n p 111 98
z
P9015 d SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/13/93 -0 G) 169 57
n
P9016 9 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/14/93 0 232 75
Fll
a
r
w
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 2
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
P9017 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RELEASE LIEN, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES $ 9 00
P9018 SIX FLAGS TEEN CLUB EXCURSION 281 25
P9019 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/16/93 950 03
P9020 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/16/93 108 94
P9021 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/19/93 326 88
P9022 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/19/93 80 46
P9024 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES EXECUTIVE FORUM, MONTEREY 390 00
P9025 LARRY MAINEZ PLANNING TECHNICIAN, 7/5-7/16/93 656 80
P9026 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/20/93 336 . 32
P9027 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/20/93 53 27
P9028 PRO PAVING FILL SINK HOLE, PICO 580 00
P9029 PERS RETIREMENT FOR PAY ROLL ENDING 7/16/93 4,787 92
27834 LISA BOON REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 30 00
27835 DEBBIE WEITZMAN REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 30 00
27836 NICOLE MONAHAN REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 25 00
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 3
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27837 ROY NIX REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM $ 50 00
27838 MARLA SAVIK REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 17 50
27839 CAROLYN JONES REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 50 00
27840 SANDRA HOTCHKISS REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 25.00
27841 SALLY HOLT REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 17 50
27842 LORINDA DORFF REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 30 00
27843 JOY BJORNSTAD REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 30 00
27844 JEANNETTE WAHLEN REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 25 00
27845 T-K INSTALLATION REPAIR DISHWASHER, CHILD CARE 85 00
27846 MARTHA CUEVAS REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 25 00
27847 MIA MEANS REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 25 00
27848 G T. MAILERS REFUND, PERMIT DEPOSIT, PLANNING 35 00
27849 LANA HAPEMAN REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 24 00
27850 A & A PRODUCE PRODUCE FOR CHILD CARE 66 60
27851 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN NEWSLETTER, CRIME PREVENTION 253 10
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 4
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22, 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27852 MATTHEW ADDINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 $ 50 00
27853 ADVANCE COPY SYSTEMS BALANCE DUE ON INVOICE FOR COPIER REPAIRS 6 14
27854 SANDRA AH SUE REIMBURSEMENT FOR TUITION 425 79
27855 ALTA DENA DAIRY DAIRY PRODUCTS FOR CHILD CARE 274 50
27856 AMATEUR ELECTRONICS ANTENNA TRAPS, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 43 01
27857 ARID IMAGE SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE ON PANASONIC COPIER 146 78
27858 BFI WASTE SYSTEMS REFUSE PICK-UP, SENIOR CENTER 76 73
27860 BANK OF AMERICA ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, BOND ISSUE,JUNE-NOV. 1993 1, 785. 00
27861 BAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 491 70
27862 BECKLEY CARDY SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION 155 13
27863 DANIEL BUCHANAN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 00
27864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT CHECK, CHILD CAR; 107 00
27865 GENE CARLSTROM STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 300 00
27866 CHEM-LITE CORPORATION TRASH LINERS, STREET MAINTENANCE 326.29
27867 RONALD CHRISTIANSON STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 300 00
f
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 5
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27868 CITY OF COLTON WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES, JULY, 1993 $ 52 , 659 42
27869 DIANA CONDOR INSTRUCTOR FOR TAP, JAZZ, AND BALLET 740 00
27870 DICKSON COMPANY STREET SWEEPING FOR JUNE, 1993 2,021.38
27871 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY MAINTENANCE ON KODAK COPIER FOR JUNE, 1993
AND EXTRA COPIES FOR MAY, 1993 364 36
27872 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 151.45
27873 FRIDAY' S LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, TERRACE PINES,JUNE, 1993 200 00
27874 G.T CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NEWSLETTER FOR JULY, 1993 833 33
27875 W.W. GRAINGER SHELVES FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 584 76
27876 HARPER AND BURNS LEGAL SERVICES FOR LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2,500.00
27877 HAROLD' S EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARD 215 50
27878 WILLIAM HAYWARD INSTRUCTOR, KARATE 613 20
27879 HERMAN HILKEY STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 300 00
27880 MOIRE HUSS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 00
27881 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 560 99
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE E
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 07229:
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27882 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE DENTAL/LIFE INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 $ 640 7]
27883 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES BUS, RECREATION EXCURSION, SANTA BARBARA 600.0(
27884 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP BAKERY GOODS FOR CHILD CARE 92 OF
27885 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHONE FOR 6/11-7/10/93 22 . 5]
27886 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS LIFE INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 568.6E
27887 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS LIFE INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 204 5(
27888 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 300 0(
27889 MINUTE MAN PRESS ENVELOPES FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL DEPT. 510.9:
27890 MUNIMETRIX INC. RENT SOFTWARE, CITY CLERK,JULY-SEPT , 1993 142 5(
27891 RAY MUNSON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 0(
27892 NCR CORP. BALANCE DUE ON PRIOR INVOICE, SUPPLIES 8"
27893 NASCO WEST SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION 3 11
27894 ONE STOP LANDSCAPE SUPPLY DUMP CHARGES FOR JUNE, 1993 110.0(
27895 ORCA KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS 165 8(
27896 PACIFICARE _ HEALTH INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 _ 5,214 6E
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27897 PAPA REG.FOR PESTICIDE SEMINAR, MAINTENANCE $ 35 00
27898 MICHAEL PAGE OPEN/CLOSE PARK ON DE BERRY,MAY/JUNE, 1993 155 00
27899 PACIFIC BELL PHONE FOR CHILD CARE, COMPUTER MODEM, AND
PAY PHONES AT CIVIC CENTER 302 76
27900 THE PETRA COMPANIES RETURN ENVELOPES, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 297 39
27901 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH, CHILD CARE 91 88
27902 KATHY PIERSON INSTRUCTOR, TINY TUMBLERS/GYMNASTICS 594 40
27903 DENNICE PRECIE INSTRUCTOR, FATHER' S DAY WORKSHOP 60 00
27904 PRECINCT REPORTER NOTICE INVITING BIDS 63 84
27905 PRUDENTIAL SERVICES HEALTH NETWORK INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 663 00
27906 QUALITY LIGHT MAINTENANCE REPAIR BALL PARK LIGHT 4, 148 85
27907 R H A ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE FOR CAL TRANS RIGHT
OF WAY AND PICO PARK, JUNE, 1993 3,521 96
27908 S E RYKOFF AND COMPANY FOOD FOR CHILD CARE 857 27
27909 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DUMPING CHARGES FOR 5/17-6/15/93 484 98
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 8
DATE: JULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO:072293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY 22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27910 S.B. MEDICAL CLINIC PHYSICAL, CHILD CARE STAFF MEMBER $ 60 00
27911 CALVIN SENECHAL INSTRUCTOR, COUNTRY WESTERN DANCE 120 25
27912 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE SIGNAL MAINTENANCE FOR JUNE, 1993 AND
REPAIR SIGNAL AT BARTON/MICHIGAN 466 3C
27913 JIM SIMS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 00
27914 JAMES SINGLEY STIPENDS FOR JULY, 1993 300 00
27915 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRIC FOR ALL CITY OWNED FACILITIES, PARKS,
SIGNALS, MERIDIANS, AND STREET LIGHTS 9,464 91
27916 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY GAS FOR ALL CITY OWNED FACILITIES 77 1E
27917 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLIES 147 7S
27918 CATHY TOTH INSTRUCTOR, AEROBICS 144 OC
27919 TRI-COUNTY OFFIC,:ALS UMPIRES FOR SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL, 7/1-7/15/93 162 OC
27920 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ALERT NOTIFICATION, JUNE, 1993 9 OC
27921 FRAN VAN GELDER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 OC
27922 VISA MEETING ATTENDED BY CITY MANAGER/COUNCIL 344 37
i
t C
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 9
DATE: DULY 22 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 072293
,
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JULY .22 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27923 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS PEST CONTROL FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES $ 145 00
27924 DOUG WILSON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 7/15/93 50 . 00
27925 YOSEMITE WATERS BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 124 84
TOTAL: $142, 102 . 01
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES
HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY.
PHIL BUSH
FINANCE DIRECTOR
(-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 081293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
P9030 ALTA DENA DAIRY DAIRY PRODUCTS, CHILD CARE
$ 349 50
P9031 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/22/93 200 31
P9032 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/22/93 146 54
P9033 PRO PAVING REPAIRS ON MT. VERNON AVE 2 , 573 25
P9034 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/26/93 251 58
P9035 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/26/93 56 45
P9036 PRUDENTIAL SERVICES RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR HEALTH NETWORK
INSURANCE, AUG. 1993 146 88
P9037 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE ADJUSTMENT FOR LIFE INSURANCE,AUG 1993 C0 13 40
P9038 0 J M S LIMITED T-SHIRTS FOR SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM Z rn 419 15
C n Z
P9039 C) COLTON CITY NEWS AD FOR EMPLOYMENT, SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM r 0 400 00
Z
P9041 F SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/28/93 13 n 110 49
P9042 0 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/28/93 0 33 51
P9043 C, SAN BERNARDINO FIRE WARDEN INSPECTION/PERMIT, CHILD CARE r 60 00
P9044 TA GRAY DAVIS,CONTROLLER CONFIRMATION OF SUBVENTION FUNDS, 1992/93 100 00
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 2
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 081293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
P9045 MICHILLE LAURENT PERSONAL DEFENDERS,CRIME PREVENTION $ 289 50
P9046 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/30/93 182 24
P9047 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 7/30/93 40 05
P9048 LARRY MAINEZ PLANNING TECHNICIAN 7/19-7/30/93 656 80
P9049 CHILD CARE CENTER CHILD CARE FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ACCOUNT 644 00
P9050 PERS RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 7/30/93 AND
ADJUSTMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 1/1/93 9,101 93
P9051 STANDARD INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 665 24
P9052 PEBSCO DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR JULY, 1993 12 , 415 92
P9053 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/3/93 365 4E
P9054 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/3/93 147 9S
P9055 CHINO HILLS CITIZENS PATROL LUNCH FOR CITIZENS PATROL TRAINING SEMINAR 140 OC
P9056 KAREN GERBER MONITOR FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS AND REIMBURSEMENT
FOR LOCAL MILEAGE 242 98
27927 ZONING BULLETIN BIWEEKLY PUBLICATION, PLANNING 76 81
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 3
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 081293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27928 ELLEN VASQUEZ REFUND, CHILD CARE SERVICES $ 52 00
27929 DEBBIE VALDEZ REFUND, CHILD CARE SERVICES 50 50
27930 CA BUSINESS SYSTEMS REPAIRS, TYPEWRITER 103 19
27931 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE 47 91
27932 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ROSTER, 1993 14 00
27933 JOHN SMITH REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 1 42
27934 AA EQUIPMENT 60" MULCHING KIT, MAINTENANCE 227 10`
27935 A 7 A PRODUCE PRODUCE FOR CHILD CARE 112 50
27936 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN PRINT NEWSLETTER, SENIOR CITIZENS 155 16
27937 ADVANCE COPY SYSTEMS TONER FOR COPIER, CHILD CARE 94 19
27938 RANDALL ANSTINE AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 200 00
27939 BAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 331 60
27940 CA PARKS & RECREATION MEMBERSHIP FOR 1993/1994 110. 00
27941 CHIEF AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 122 51
27942 CITY OF COLTON WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES, AUGUST, 1993 52,719.11
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 08129:
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27943 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE $ 282 1(
27944 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 165 3_
27946 FLOWERS BY YVONNE FLOWERS FOR TRIMBLE 48 4�
27947 G T. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRINT NEWSLETTER FOR AUG & SEPT , 1993 1, 666 6(
27948 GREENWOOD' S UNIFORMS UNIFORM FOR CITIZENS PATROL 51 8:
27949 HONEYWELL, INC. MAINTENANCE, HVAC UNIT, AUGUST, 1993 1,078 5
27950 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP BAKERY GOODS FOR CHILD CARE 110 9:
27951 JANI KING JANITORIAL SERVICES,AUG 1993 , CHILD CARE 809 0(
27952 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES, 7/1-7/25/93 11, 893 6�
27953 PATRIZIA MATERASSI AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 200 0(
27955 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY MAINTENANCE, ELEVATOR, AUGUST, 1993 225 6:
27956 PACIFIC BELL PHONE FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 727 2(
27957 PAGENET-ONTARIO PAGERS FOR AUGUST, 1993 44 0(
27958 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH, CHILD CARE 241 2=
27959 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH, GENERAL-FINANCE 321 6E
(-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 5
DATE: AUGUST 12 , 1993 CHECK REGISTER NO: 081293
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: AUGUST 12 , 1993
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
27960 PRECINCT REPORTER NOTICE, INVITING BIDS $ 229 43
27961 S E RYKOFF & COMPANY FOOD, CHILD CARE 1,148.77
27962 THOMAS SCHWAB AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR AUGUST, 1993 200 00
27963 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE 100 09
27964 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRIC FOR PARKS, SIGNALS AND CITY
OWNED FACILITIES 5,130 69
27965 SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE SERVICE CITY OWNED TRUCKS 57 84
27966 STAPLES CALCULATOR, FINANCE 96 72
27967 THE SUN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INVITING BIDS 313 44
27968 TEXACO REFINING/MARKETING FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 505 66
27970 WAXIE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, CIVIC CENTER 378 00
27971 YOSEMITE WATERS BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 147.00
PAYROLL FOR JULY, 1993 168,635 81
TOTAL: $278, 980. 47
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY
42(- 42 /
PHIL BUSH, FINANCE DIRECTOR
1
PENDING CITY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JULY 8, 1993
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic
Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on July 8,
1993 at 6:10 P.M.
' ' PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor
Ronald Christianson, Mayor Pro Tempore
Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
Phil Bush, Finance Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
John Harper, City Attorney
Lt. Rodney Hoops, Sheriff's Department
ABSENT: Patrizia Materassi, Planning Director
The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Pro Tem
Christianson, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by
Councilmember Carlstrom.
CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Matteson announced that Council went into Closed
Session to discuss personnel matters and potential
litigation involving the City of Grand Terrace v OMG.
No decisions were made.
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at
7: 05 P.M.
Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at
7. 15 P.M
ITEMS TO DELETE
2A Certificate of Commendation - Frank Perez
City Manager Schwab reported that Mr. Perez could
not attend the meeting but would be awarded the
Certificate of Commendation at the August 12 , 1993
City Council Meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 31
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 2
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2B. Presentation to Outgoing Chamber President from
Supervisor Riordan
Ed O'Neal, on behalf of Supervisor Riordan,
presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Elsa
Ingalls for her leadership and dedicated service as
the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce President
from November 1, 1991 to June 30, 1993 .
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-93-112 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the
remainder of the Consent Calendar with the removal of
Items 3E, 3G, and 3H.
A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 070893
B. RATIFY 07/08/93 CRA ACTION
C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA
D. APPROVE 6/23/93 MINUTES
F. BID AWARD - ROAD MAINTENANCE
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
3E. BID AWARD - BARTON ROAD
CC-93-113 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the re-bidding of the
Barton Road Improvement Plan since no bids were received
by the bidding deadline of July 6, 1993 .
3G. Bid Award - Pico Park
CC-93-114 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
CHRISTIANSON, CARRIED 5-0, to reject all bids received on
July 6, 1993 for the Pico Park project as all bids were
in excess of the amount budgeted for the project and to
authorize the re-bidding of the Pico Park project
3H. Refuse Exemption (O'Neal)
Ed O'Neal, 22608 Minona Drive, Grand Terrace, indicating
that he previously worked as Supervisor Riordan's
recycling staff person, remarked that he has attempted to
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 3
achieve 100% recycling Citing that he adjusted his
living habits and utilizes a chipper, a fireplace, and
composting to eliminate waste, he asserted that he has
attained over 90% recycling. He commented that he
requested that B.F.I. discontinue service to his
residence but stated that he received a notice informing
him that refuse collection is mandatory in Grand Terrace.
He voiced frustration for being compelled to pay for a
service he does not use. He suggested that the City
create a Utilities Commission to perform research and to
make recommendations to Council regarding all public
utility issues
CC-93-115 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, SECOND BY MAYOR
MATTESON, CARRIED 5-0, to grant Mr O'Neal an exemption
from mandatory refuse collection.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Debra Mueller, 22608 La Paix, Grand Terrace; remarked
that she had intended to file for a refuse collection
exemption but did not. She commented, however, that she
was exempted from curbside recycling, indicating that she
has also achieved 90% recycling yet revealing that she
has reduced her recycling efforts in order to make the
mandatory refuse collection cost-effective.
ORAL REPORTS
5A. Committee Reports
1. Historical and Cultural Committee
(a) Appoint Member (McBride)
CC-93-116 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTEbOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to appoint Judy McBride as a
regular member of the Historical and Cultural Committee,
with the term to expire June 30, 1994.
(b) Minutes of 6/7/93
CC-93-117 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
CHRISTIANSON, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the Historical and
Cultural Committee Minutes of June 7 , 1993 .
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 3
achieve 100% recycling. Citing that he adjusted his
living habits and utilizes a chipper, a fireplace, and
composting to eliminate waste, he asserted that he has
attained over 90% recycling. He commented that he
requested that B.F.I. discontinue service to his
residence but stated that he received a notice informing
him that refuse collection is mandatory in Grand Terrace
He voiced frustration for being compelled to pay for a
service he does not use. He suggested that the City
create a Utilities Commission to perform research and to
make recommendations to Council regarding all public
utility issues.
CC-93-115 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, SECOND BY MAYOR
MATTESON, CARRIED 5-0, to grant Mr O'Neal an exemption
from mandatory refuse collection.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Debra Mueller, 22608 La Paix, Grand Terrace; remarked
that she had intended to file for a refuse collection
exemption but did not. She commented, however, that she
was exempted from curbside recycling, indicating that she
has also achieved 90% recycling yet revealing that she
has reduced her recycling efforts in order to make the
mandatory refuse collection cost-effective.
ORAL REPORTS
5A. Committee Reports
1. Historical and Cultural Committee
(a) Appoint Member (McBride)
CC-93-116 MOTION BY MAYOR' MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to appoint Judy McBride as a
regular member of the Historical and Cultural Committee,
with the term to expire June 30, 1994
(b) Minutes of 6/7/93
CC-93-117 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
CHRISTIANSON, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the Historical and
Cultural Committee Minutes of June 7, 1993
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 4
5B. Council Reports
Mayor Matteson, reporting that two Councilmembers
will be unable to attend the July 22, 1993 City
Council Meeting, announced the cancellation of the
July 22, 1993 meeting. He indicated that the next
City Council meeting will be August 12, 1993 unless
a Special Meeting is called.
CC-93-118 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CHRISTIANSON, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to cancel the July
22, 1993 City Council Meeting.
City Attorney Harper, advised that a bond issue may
necessitate the calling of a Special Meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Christianson, referring to
correspondence from Stater Brother's security,
suggested that the City develop an ordinance
prohibiting skateboarding.
Mayor Matteson, requested that staff investigate
the issue and return the matter to Council.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that the City has
experienced some difficulties with skateboarders.
Mayor Matteson, inquired whether the City has an
ordinance prohibiting skateboarding.
City Manager Schwab, replied in the negative
Mayor Matteson, questioned the method the City uses
to curtail problem skateboarders
Lt. Rodney Hoops, respc-ded that the skateboarders
are cited under public nuisance and trespassing
laws. He indicated that the Sheriff's Department
has requested that the Bank of America and Stater
Brother's post signs that will read "Skateboarding
prohibited under Penal Code Section 602 . All
violators will be prosecuted. " He revealed that
the Sheriff's Department has met with concerned
parents, adding that most of the skateboarding
issues have been resolved.
Mayor Pro Tem Christianson, in reference to a
letter Council received regarding the lumpers on
Barton Road, indicated that the Sheriff's
Department is addressing the issue.
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 5
Councilmember Carlstrom, reported that he attended
the monthly SANBAG meeting on Wednesday, July 7,
1993 , remarking that the meeting marked the 20th
anniversary of the formation of the organization.
He also commented that the SANBAG budget was
discussed, remarking that revenue from Measure "I"
and Proposition ill has diminished. He expressed
his opinion that the State balanced its budget at
the expense of the cities and counties and voiced
concern regarding Grand Terrace's loss of revenue.
Councilmember Singles, remarked that he attended
the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce Installation
Dinner on June 30, 1993 with the Mayor, Mayor Pro
Tem, and the City Manager. He reported also that
the CDF Fire District and Water Assessments will
not be levied against the public.
Councilmember Hilkey, indicated that a Transit
Needs Survey to determine potential bus ridership
in the City will appear in the Fall edition of the
community newsletter. He indicated that at the
Omnitrans meeting he discovered that Metrolink will
open a station in Highgrove prior to 1995,
speculating that the commuter rail will enhance the
possibility of establishing a bus route through
Grand Terrace.
Mayor Matteson, expressed opposition to the
Highgrove station location, citing the potential
traffic increase through Grand Terrace.
PUBLIC HEARING
6A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace Amending Title 4 of the Municipal Code and
Establishing a Comprehensive Scheaule for Fees , Taxes,
and Fines for Permits, Licenses, Services, Facilities, -
and Activities Provided by the City of Grand Terrace.
CC-93-119 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CHRISTIANSON, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to continue the
Public Hearing for the first reading of the Ordinance
amending Title 4 of the Municipal Code and establishing
a comprehensive schedule for fees, taxes, and fines for
permits, licenses, services, facilities, and activities
provided by the City of Grand Terrace to the regular City
Council meeting of August 12 , 1993 .
Council Minutes - 07/08/93
Page 6
6B. Landscaping and Street Lighting District 89-1
Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public, there
being none, he returned discussion to Council.
CC-93-120 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt the Resolution
confirming a diagram and assessment and providing the
annual assessment levy after formation of a district and
to levy the annual Assessment for Landscaping and Street
Lighting District No. 89-1 for the Fiscal Year 1993-94 .
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Measure I Capital Improvement Program
CC-93-121 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the
Resolution adopting the five-year Capital Improvement
Program and twenty-year Transportation Plan
8B. Consider Naming Park Site at 22627 Grand Terrace Road
CC-93-122 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the naming of the park
site at 22627 Grand Terrace Road "Susan Petta Memorial
Park. "
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council Meeting at 8. 00
p.m , until the next regular CRA/City Council Meeting,
which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, August 12 ,
1993
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
STAFF REPORT ,4
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE. 8/6/93
SUBJECT AWARD OF CONTRACT SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT
BACKGROUND.
On June 17, 1993, the City Clerk opened, and read aloud, the bids for the Senior
Center Expansion Project. As Council is aware, this project is being funded by way
of the Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program. The project was
bid in two schedules Schedule I was for modular construction,while Schedule II was
for the addition of standard on grade foundation, concrete slab and conventional
building construction Four bids were received for the proposed project on June 17,
1993.
Bidder's name Schedule I Schedule II
Space Leasing $64,504 00 $ No Bid
Janus Corp $No Bid $41,372.00
S.C.C. $No Bid $54,629.00
Gorilla Const. $71,770.50 $48,735.06
The low bidder on June 17, 1993, Janus Corporation failed to submit a portion of the
bid package relating to the MBE and WBE. The second low bidder, Gorilla
Construction, filed a protest. After bid review, it was the recommendation of the
County Department of Economic and Community Development that the project be re-
bid. New bids were received on July 15, 1993. The results of the second round of
bidding are as follows:
Bidders name Schedule I Schedule II
Janus Corp. No Bid $41,372 00
S C.C. No Bid $44,834.37
Gorilla Const. $71,770 50 $48,735.06
Staff has reviewed the proposals and the proposal of the low bidder, Janus
Corporation, appears to meet all of the bid requirements.
FORM MOTION
AWARD THE SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT TO THE JANUS CORPORATION
OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,372.00, BASED UPON
APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF ECONOMIC AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RI A
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3 a
,NGt .,t!
clTr 12-9 1135
STAFF REPORT
,GRAND TERR C
ti'�, 0` DATE July 8, 1993
MEETING DATE July 22, 1993
22795 Barton Road SUBJECT La Mancha Development Company
Grand Terrace P P Y
California 92324-5295
Civic Center As conditions of approval , La Mancha Development Company was required to
(909) 824-6621 install improvements at the northwest corner of Barton Road and Mt Vernon
Fax(909) 783-7629 Avenue
To secure a building permit prior to the installation of the required
improvements, La Mancha Development Company posted two bonds for the
improvements. The bonds were for the Performance ($13,500 00) and Labor
and Material ($6,750.00)
Byron R Matteson The work as required has been completed, therefore the bond may now be
Ma'.or released.
nald M Chnstianson STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT
Mayor Pro Tempore
City Council authorize the release of bond #3SM 770 42700
me Carlstrom
erman Hilkey (a) For Performance - $13,500.00.
Jim Singley
Council Members (b) For Labor and Material - $6,750 00.
Thomas J Schwab
City Manager JK/ct
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3C
STAFF REPORT
DATE August 6, 1993
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE August 12, 1993
SUBJECT REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM 93-03 (MELENDEZ)
The City of Grand Terrace has received a claim (GTLC-93-03) in the amount of$133 32 Our
Claims Adjuster has reviewed the claim and is requesting that the City reject the Claim and send
a standard rejection letter to the claimant
Attached for your review is a copy of the claim
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL:
REJECT CLAIM GTLC-93-03 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO NO1'll Y THE
CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION TAKEN
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3 G•
CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY
1 Claims for death, injury to person, or to personal property must be filed not later than 100
days after the occurrence (Gov Code, Sec 911 2)
2 Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the
occurrence (Gov Code, Sec 911 2)
TO CITY OF(1 c� jr--71 Al
)11 0VI 0 f We 1 J J- - c�
1C , �t YjC� 14-v (C�/ i/j
Name of Claimant Address t Phone Age p 9o9 ) ��ce-4fjg �t
K ro c 9 D_y
Address to whin Claimant wishes notices sent
WHEN did damage or injury occur? (2 - _ 93
WHERE did damage or injury occur 2-7-2 f,/'A C-r ,l4 L\$ (a v vtc,ti rt i 4-1 9-' 'K
HOW and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur? +ja ,
r rC Jvs /4-vx (.� ��.
_Le 4--,2 ;A. U J �v` � !n �� ( '
WHAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury?
(Include names of employees, if known)
17o 9 '/ - 5.�,_ e 1
WHAT sum do you claim? Include the estimated amount of any prospective loss, insofar as it
may be known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of
computation of the amount claimed (Attach estimates or bills, if possible)
Total Amount Claimed $ 7 3 3-3---j
1 �
NAMESn and address of witnesses, Doctors a Hospitals
(z4--3 3
DATE S N TURE OF C MANT
RECEIVED
J l ,
'CITY CLERK'S DEPT
STAFF REPORT
DATE August 6, 1993
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL 1'1'EM (X) MEETING DATE August 12, 1993
SUBJECT REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM 93-04 (CITY OF RIVERSIDE)
The City of Grand Terrace has received a claim (GTLC-93-04) in the amount of$130,584 00
Our Claims Adjuster has reviewed the claim and is requesting that the City reject the Claim and
send a standard rejection letter to the claimant
Attached for your review is a copy of the claim
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL.
REJECT CLAIM GTLC-93-04 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY THE
CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION TAKEN
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3
RECENEv OFFICE OF CI11 CLERK
City Hall, GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA
0' CLAIM AGAINST CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA
NOTE CertA LptrV AT governing the filing of claims for money or damages arc eat forth in
Title 1, 61Vi§ion 3 6, Part 3 (Sections 900, et seq ) of the Government Code, State of
California This claim form has been prepared in accordance with California Government Code,
Section 910 4 When this form is used, please submit in triplicate to City Clerk, City Rail
22795 BARTON ROAD, GRAND TERRACE, CA. 92324 retaining the fourth copy for your files *
aOriginal Filing l l Amendment to Previous Claim
Naze of Claimant CITY OF RIVERSIDE 1
Post Office Address of Claimant PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, 3900 MAIN STREET, RIVERSIDE, CP
Post Office Address to which notices regarding this claim are to be sent 92522
SAME AS ABOVE
On (date of occurrence or transaction) SERIES OF RAIN SIURMI4 1/6/93 - 2/20/93
At (place of occurrence or transaction) RIVERSIDE CANAL TUNNEL AT GRAND TERRACE CT & VIVIENDA
AVE
General description of the indebtedness, obligation, injury, damage or loss incurred - so
far as it is known at the time of presenting this claim
FAILURE OF STORM DRAIN FACILITIES THAT PLUGGED AS A RESULT OF HEAVY RAIN STORMS CAUSING THE
DETENTION BASIN ADJACENT TO THE ROAD TO OVERFCW OVER THE ROAD SURFACE. THE OVERFLOW ERODED TH
ROAD SLOPE ADJACENT TO THE TUNNEL ENTRANCE CAUSING MUD & DEBRIS TO PARTIALLY FILL THE
RIVERSIDE CANAL TUNNEL.
Resulting from (including, but not limited to, circumstances of the occurrence of trans-
action which gave rise to the claim asserted)
THE MUD & DEBRIS HAD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TUNNEL SO THAT IT CAN BE USED FOR DELIVERING
IRRIGATION %LATER.
The names of any City employees claimed to have caused the injury, damage, or loss (if
known) are as follows
Amount claimed as of date of this claim (including the estimated amount of any prospective
injury, damage, or loss, insofar as may be known at this time) $ 130,584 00
Computed as follows (set forth basis of computation of the amount claimed, attach bills,
invoices, statements, etc if available) EXPENSE DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED
PAID TO THE CONTRAC TOR (T.A IVARD) = S1I8_176 nn
ENGINEERING CHARGES FOR PREPARATION OF BIILDOCUMFNrs b CYNPRACT TenpFr rm = S6.775.00
EXPENSES TO STABILIZE ACCRSS ROAD SLOPES = $5,431.00
TOTAL = $130,584-00
Names and addresses of known vitnesees to occurrence or transaction
� �1
Signature of Claimant 2).,(i/U1/
, (J Business 11.+ne 782-5502
Q,n( BILL D. C71R,Pi1TN, PULIC DUL
Dated 7 g113 0 (lone Phon.
*NOTE If sufficient space is not provided for information, please attach additional
sheets securely to this form Return white and blue copies to City Clerk
Form No 111-1 R1 7-71 Pink copy for Claimant's file
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE:8/12/93
SUBJECT: BARTON ROAD BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
On August 6, 1993, City staff opened and read aloud the bids for the Barton Road
Beautification Project. A total one (1) bid was received. Pro Paving, Inc., of Grand
Terrace submitted a bid in the amount of $195,000.00. As Council may recall, this
is the second time in a month that this project has been to public bid. Since only one
bid has been received,staff is recommending that the project be rebid,in four phases.
The first phase of construction would be the phase involving the construction of the
block wall at Grand Terrace Elementary School.
Staff Recommends-
COUNCIL REJECT THE BID FROM PRO PAVING, INC., AND FURTHER AUTHORIZE
STAFF TO REBID THE PROJECT IN FOUR DIFFERENT PHASES, WITH PHASE ONE
INCLUDING THE BLOCK WALL AT GRAND TERRACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
RLA
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3 Z
STAFF FPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE:8/12/93
SUBJECT: BID AWARD PICO PARK PROJECT
Recommendation Award the Pico Park construction project to Micon Engineering,
Inc., of Placentia, CA., in the amount of $1,046,306 24.
Background. On August 6, 1993, City staff opened and read aloud, the bid
results for the Pico Park construction project. A total of six proposals were submitted
for consideration. The results of the bid opening are as follows:
BIDDER AMOUNT
BOPARK CONSTRUCTION $1,156,950 00
VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE $1,252,500.00
PLAZA LANDSCAPE $1,133,000.00
COAST LANDSCAPE $1,164,277 00
MARINA CONSTRUCTION $1,208,000.00
MICON ENGINEERS, INC. $1,046,306.24
In performing the background check on Micon Engineers, staff has received very
favorable responses from their listed references. They have recently completed
projects for the Cities of Chino Hills, Fullerton, Orange, San Clemente and Laguna
Niguel.
STAFF RECOMMENDS
COUNCIL AWARD THE PICO PARK PROJECT TO MICON ENGINEERS, INC., IN THE
AMOUNT OF $1,046,306.24.
RLA
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# ��
STAFF REPORT
DATE August 6, 1993
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE August 12, 1993
SUBJECT SOLICITING PERMIT APPLICATION - JUNIOR EurE, TRAINING
SYSTEMS (KERRIGAN)
Attached is a copy of Junior Elite Training Systems application for a soliciting permit
Representatives of this organization propose to solicit donations door to door to raise funds for
amateur athletes
Junior Elite Training Systems is a chantable organization, therefore, they were required to pay
an application fee, but will not be required to pay a business license fee
In accordance with the Municipal Code, the Shenff s Department has investigated the applicant
and they have no objections to the City issuing them a permit
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL
APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO SOLICIT SUBMITTED BY JUNIOR
ELITE TRAINING SYSTEMS
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 3 K
i---/Ve-ct.) )
CI FY OF GRAND TERRACE
APPLICATION FOR PEDDLING, SOLICITING OR HAWKING LICENSE
(PURSUANT TO REQUIPFMFNTS OF CHAPTER 5 64, GRAND TFRRACE MUNICIPAL CODE/f0 CITY CLERF S OFFICE DATE �(Z( 7 3
CITY OF GRAND TERRACF -
22795 BARTON ROAD
GRAND rFRRACC CA 97374
APPLICATION IS HrREBY MADE FOR A CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LICENSE TO ENGAGE IN THE
BUSINESS OF PEDDLING OR HAWKING GOODS, WARES, MERCHANDISE OR OF SOLICITING ORDERS
FOR GOODS OR SERVICES, OR OF OFFERING SERVICES FOR REPAIR OR IMPROVEMENT OF REAL
PROPERTY EXCEEDING $25 00 IN COST OR VALUE WITH THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
PURSUANT TO THE PPOVISION OF CHAPTER 5 64, GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE, WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE THAT, IF APPROVED THE REQUIRED LICENSE FEE SHALL BE PAID TO THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1 APPLICANT S _EGA rl L NAME tvA5 vie e e -_3-(2.__((p(h 3 ^
ADDRESS �s`(,3k. L L( , b C'A l,7,2b (r 0(4 j
(NUMBER AND STRCEr) 'AND AND ZIP) (TELEPHONE)
IF PEIIGIOUS OI(`ONPROFj ? ANSWER THE FOLLOWING
BUSINESS ADDRESS _TO,' (O(L "L( T h -1 -(I)(/t IL/'S—E,pi 3
DATE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK S OFFICE
2 APPLICANT, PARTNERS OR OTHER PERSONS WHO WILL ENGAGE IN SOLICITING OR
HAWKING (NOTE EACH PERSON MUST OBTAIN A SEPARATE LICENSE)
NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER DRIVER S LICENSE NUMBER
-n T c14vv-te'V7\l 76°65D . 0%870 Z 8
3 SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND TIME OF DAY APPLICANT INTENDS TO HAWK, PEDDLE OR
SOLICIT AT EACH LOCATION (WRITTEN PERMISSION OF PROPERTY OWNER MUST BE
SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION FOR ALL HAWKERS LICENSE)
SO L , Po(al,\rY'l A~l L(6(-(7 r+,gc-J-3 Ai(7-74- /A.) C./ r, Le.rc /7-
4 THE SUPPLIER OF THE GOODS TO BE SOLD AND A DESCRIPTION OF EVERY TYPE OF
MERCHANDISE OR SERVICE THAT APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HAWK, PEDDLE OR SOLICIT
We tz(3t-(5E 7-Ay- bp c� /00/v/f-77-0,tl S aCff&c(cs OA)
9A1A4( C(1-5h (7o,vv -ceDi-JS) 6, vs (r1-1,17Fa,C. -(Z r- %
5 TYPE OF OPERATION (PEDDLING, SOLICITING, HAWKINC) e-727 DociA Soc I
6 HAS APPLICANT OR PERSONS NAMED IN SECTION 2 OF THIS APPLICATION EVER BEEN
CONVICTED OF THEFT FRAUD BURGLARY, BATTERY, OR BEEN A SEX OFFENDER IN
CALIFORNIA' YES ( ) NO
(FAILURE TO PROVIDE CORREC INFORMATION WILL RESULT IN DENIAL OR REVOCATION
OF LICENSE )
EXPLANATION (GIVE REASON AND DISPOSITION) /Cr f42-
7 DESCRIPTION HAIR %v EYES /3(c)L WT /4 s— RACE E c -
B BIRTH DATE O- 3 S 2- PLACE OF BIRTH ((7 -z_ vas' 7-047 -7-c ,/
itc
/
SPOUSE S NAME �-7!IF 7ATURALI ZED, PLACE AND DATE (Q J�
( y) MARRIED ( ) SINGLE MAIDEN NAME -/ /
9/ HAVE YOU EVEP USED ANY OTHER NAME ( ) YES NO IF SO GIVE NAME OR
NAMES AND REASONS FOR USE
10 DO YOU HAVE A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON' ( )YES / NO IF SO
GIVE NAME, nR NAMES, AND REASONS FOR USE
11 OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYMENT DURING PAST FIVE YEARS
FIRM ADDRESS OCCUPATION
T--G / 7 0 i((' cuf /)) rvND/1f+-/S F2
-2-715 Na73 5,r y,p/fr1k red_ (c C (
A COPY OF THE STATE SALES TAX PERMIT (CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE 6066)
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY DECLARE THAT I HAVE CAREFULLY READ SECTION 5 64 OF THE
GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE, THAT I UNDERSTAND IT THOROUGHLY AND WILL CARRY OUT
EVERY PROVISION THEREOF I FURTHER STATE THAT THE STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS
CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,
KNOWING THAT ANY FAISE STATEMENT WILL BE SUFFICICNT CAUSE FOR DENIAL OR
REVOCATION OF SAID LICENSE I DECLARE THAT THERE IS NO KNOWN CLOUD ON THE TITLE
TO OWNERSHIP OF THE GOODS TO BE SOLD
I DECLARE, U DER ENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT OLLOWING I TRUE AND CO E
DATE 2-t( P ) SIGNATURE � /
FEE $27 00 PER QUARTER ($30 00 DOLLAR APPLICATION FEE APPLIED TO LICENSE)
I HEREBY APPLY FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING EXEMPTIONS AND HAVE SUBMITTED VALID
PROOF
( ) *DISABILITY ( ) **UNDER 18 ( ) ***VETERAN
(7(/ *RELIGIOUS OR NONPROFIT ( ) * OVER 55 ( ) ***SPECIAL VETERAN
*`SEE MUNICIPAL CODE
**LETTER FROM PARENTS REQUIRED
***AUTHORIZATION FROM VETERANS AFFAIRS REQUIRED, SPECIAL VETERANS EXEMPTION
REQUIRES PROOF THAT APPLICANT OWNS GOOD (BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SEC
16102)
SPECIAL VETERANS EXEMPTION STATEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I OWN ALL THE.
GOODS, WARES OR HEPCUA4DISE THAT I PLAN TO HAWK, PEDDLE OR Vci4D
\ SIGNATURE '(. IX
AFTER APPROVAL, THE LICENSE FEE SHALL BE PAID TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE 22795 BARTON ROAD, GRAND TERRACE 92324
I RECOMMEND THAT THIS APPLICATION BE ( APPROVED ( ) D ED
DATE 7a8-93 SHERIFF J , 'ARTMl
WA
401
BYi 4
ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVIC: . HAVE : EN MET, AND THE
APPLICATION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL (NOT NE ESSARY , APPLICANT IS NOT
HANDLING FOOD )
DATE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
BY
HAWKER S LOCATION(S) MEETS ALL APPLICABLE ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS
DATE ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT
BY
(REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION TO BE RETURNED TO THE CIPY CLEPK WITHIN (10) JAYS
AFTER REFERRAL )
CITY COUNCIL ACTION APPLICATION FEE PAID 5.
( ) APPROVED ( ) DENIED
CASH, CERTIFIED CHECK OR
BRENDA STANFILL, DEPUTY CITY CLERK MONEY ORDER
ACCEPTED BY(/' auveyf
DATE �+
APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED
( ) STATE SALES TAX PERMIT
( ) WRITTEN PERMISSION OF OWNER (IF HAWKER LICENSE APPLIED FCR)
( ) WRITTEN PERMISSION OF PARENT IF U"IDER 18 YEARS OE AGE
'yam,_ 471 `- L� �r i s F✓�
RECEIVED
._'TY CLERK'S DEPT
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE
MINUTES FOR THE JULY 5, 1993 MEETING
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Vi Gratson at 7 PM.
Those present were Ann Petta, Colleen Edmundson, Vi , Hannah
Laister, Irene Mason and Randy Anstine.
The Secretary' s minutes for June were read and approved on
motion from Colleen, seconded by Ann. Treasurer's report shows
a new fiscal year balance of $1500.00.
Old Business.
Show Case: Randy reported that Mr. Mc Means of the Water Co.
is just too busy to look for material. Ann has had no response
from Mrs. Miller. The Committee will work on something else.
Country Fair: Flyers went out in this month's sewer bills to
remind people to get going on projects_ Colleen will check with
Rex to be sure that we have the Community Center for November
6th from 10 AM to 4 PM.
Randy got the tapes back from the transcriber. Yolanda,who
works for the City) is off for 4 months. Randy will give to her
to do on her maternity leave. The Committee will have to come
up with a plan on how to put the booklet together. Randy
suggested that C indy in City Hall has a journalism degree and
may be able to help us with ideas.
Vi will send a card to Betty Trimble whos father passed away.
Judy McBride shou ld be confirmed as a member at the next
Cou ncil meeting.
There will be no meeting in August. The next meeting will be
Tuesday, September 7th due to Labor Day. The meeting was
adjourned at 7:40 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
04.441, 1j;
Hannah Laister,
Secretary
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# 5P 1(a)
RECEIVED
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMI'1TEE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY CLERK'S DEPT
MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 18, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by chairman Gary
Eldridge.
2. APPROVAL OF MARCH MINUTES:
The minutes of the March meeting were read and approved.
3. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT:
Liaison was not present.
4. EOUIPMENT/FACILITY STATUS REPORT:
a) All communications equipment is functioning correctly.
b) The battery operated clocks are installed and
functioning.
5. OLD BUSINESS:
a) Earthquake preparedness week — Only 10 citizens attended
the presentations given both nights. The presentation
was well received by those that did attend and the
committee's assessment is that it was extremely
informative and interesting. Those who attended
benefitted greatly. Chairman Gary will write thankyou
letters to the presenters. There was some discussion on
general apathy toward disaster preparedness and the
general concensus was that the turnout was not due to
improper planning.
b) The committee decided that because of the activities for
Earthquake Preparedness Week that there would be no
participation in Grand Terrace Days. Cindy will call
Sharon Korgan.
c) Gary reported that he had discussions with Finance
Director Phil Bush on being present at the budget
hearings. Gary will talk to Randy concerning whether the
committee can obtain a computer using this year's funds
or should attempt to obtain funding for next fiscal year.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
None to report.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#S 14 a(b)
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
None to report.
8 . NEXT REGULAR MEETING:
The next regular meeting will be held on June 15 at 7:00 pm.
9. ADJOURN:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
<7.4aldvi.410. -g0d0124)
James A. Hodder, Secretary
Emergency Operations Committee
RECEWED
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
CITY CLERK'S DEPT
MARCH 16, 1993
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gary Eldridge at
7: 15 pm on March 16, 1993 .
ATTENDANCE: Members present were Gary Eldridge, Vic
Phennighausen, Eileen Hodder, Cindy Williams, and Jim Hodder.
Visitor: Hank Leutz ; Quake Safety Institute
LIAISON REPORT-
Liaison not present.
EQUIPMENT/FACILITY STATUS:
1 . Vic reported that the phone extension lines had been
run in the main room.
2 . All communications equipment is functioning normally.
'
3 . The new commode has been installed.
OLD BUSINESS:
1 . Some of the materials that are used in the "desk in
a box" for the key operating positions have arrived and are
in the EOC.
2 . Lenore Will, has confirmed that she will be conducting
the disaster preparedness presentation on April 20 and 21 .
The times will be from 7. 30 to 9 : 00 . Gary saw the presentation
at the Loma Linda University Amateur Radio Club meeting on Sunday
and was favorably impressed. The sewer bill went out with the
announcements. Gary will contact Randy and arrange for the
opening of the chambers for the activities . Jim, Eileen , and
Cindy will get copies of the announcements from City Hall and
visit local merchants for support by requesting that they display
them in their windows over the next several weeks . Cindy will
contact Captain Phil De Clerck and invite him. Eileen will
contact Virginia Hardford from the Pres Enterprize and invite
her She is a Grand Terrace resident and reports on community
events. Eileen will also contact the San Bernardino Sun. Gary
will contact Comcast for recording We have not been able to
contact the chamber. Cindy will follow up Hank Leutz went
over the disaster material and supplies that his company has
available and suggestions were made on those that would be of
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# sPra(a)
particular interest to citizens and should be available the
nights of the presentation. There were some new items since
we last talked to Hank and they were discussed.
NEW BUSINESS:
1 . Grand Terrace days and the committee ' s participation
was tabled until the next regular meeting.
2. Vic will talk to Randy and find out the tentative
schedule for the budget sessions.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
None.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 pm.
Because the Earthquake Month activities are on ou next meeting
night he next regular meeting will be held at 7: 00 pm on May
18, 1993.
i
Repectfully submitted,
James A. Hodder, Secretary
Emergency Operations Committee
August 5, 1993
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: August 12 , 1993
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: CITY COMPREHENSIVE FEE ORDINANCE REVISION
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED _
City staff are proposing revisions to the Comprensive Fee Ordinance
(No. 112) Revisions include changes to Business License Taxes,
Parking Citation Fines, Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning
fees.
A comparative analysis of local cities business license fees for
selected businesses (see attachment "A") shows Grand Terrace ' s Business
License Tax rates to be significantly less than other surrounding
localities. Therefore City staff have proposed increasing business
license taxes structure (see attachment "B") to bring our fees more in
line with other local cities. Staff estimates that proposed increases
will provide $25, 000 of additional revenue to the City' s general fund.
Parking Citation Fines have been revised to incorporate the 1992
Isenberg Trial Court Reform Act which authorized counties to increase
parking violation penalties to $5 per violation. This legislation
mandates $3 00 to go to the County and $2 . 00 to the state general fund.
In addition some fines have been increased to reflect state vehicle
code increases (example: illegal parking in a handicap zone is now $250
up from $52)
Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning fees have also been
increased to more closely reflect the fees of other local cities (see
attachment "C") . Be advised that even with the proposed increases
Grand Terrace' s fee structure is still the lowest in the area.
Staff Recommends that Council:
1. AMEND THE CITY' S COMPREHENSIVE FEE, FINE AND TAX SCHEDULE
ORDINANCE NO. 112
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# C
DATE: June 16, 1993
TO: Tom Schwab
FROM: Phil Bush
SUBJECT: BUSINESS LICENSE FEE COMPARISON
Attached is a comparative analysis of surrounding cities business
license fees for selected businesses. As expected, the City of
Grand Terrace's fees are significantly below the average.
Therefore the Finance Department has proposed increases to our
business license fee structure (see attachment B) to bring our fees
more in line with other local cities. The proposed increases will
provide approximately $25, 000 of additional revenue to the City's
general fund. Please review and let me know if you have any
questions.
AT7'ACHr�ENT I.
i
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
BUSINESS LICENSE FEES COMPARISON
BASED ON LOCAL CITIES FEE STRUCTURES
PRESENT PROPOSED LOCAL
GROSS SAN LOMA GRAND GRAND CITIES
BUSINESS TYPE RECEIPTS REDLANDS BERNARDINO RIALTO FONTANA COLTON LINDA TERRACE TERRACE AVERAGE
GROCERY STORE $6,000,000 3,609 3,048 3,067 1,538 1,391 1,815 800 1,200 2,411
RESTAURANT $930,000 567 513 567 270 456 387 220 320 460
REAL ESTATE BROKER $900,000 2,709 2,288 954 900 695 555 220 320 1,350
LAW OFFICE $800,000 2,409 2,038 854 800 620 495 220 320 1,203
CONVENIENCE STORE $780,000 478 438 467 233 315 250 220 320 364
DENTIST $75,000 228 220 129 73 71 59 28 50 130
DRY CLEANERS $25,000 24 68 98 50 26 23 28 30 48
VIDEO RENTAL $7,000 13 54 79 50 25 19 28 30 40
''
A A i j CA/n7EAI I A
c ii , _► N�wr/D e11 d
SL 86$ ssTNIsn8 2Isd ROV I AK
05Z'6S$ 'I%LOL
85 L55 sSBNIsn8 iisd HOVH AK
000'9 OOZY$ 0 5
055't'E$ 'IVSOs 000't 008$ 0 5
00Z'E OZES 0 OT
00o't7 0085 0 S oov'S OLZ$ 0 SZ
005'Z 005$ 0 5 00L'L OZZ$ 0 SE
00Z'Z OZZS e0 OT 008'9 OLT$ 0 Ot
05L'Z OTT 0 SZ 000'6 OZTS 0 SL
OL8'Z Z8$ 0 SE 059'9 OLS 0 56
055'TT 55$ 0 OTZ 000'E OS$ 0 09
089'8 8Z$ 0 OTE OOS'L OES 0 OSZ
XIW SQss0OUd am XIW SQ830OZid ss3
UHIVNIISH QSSKWIISs
008$ 3O WIIWIXKW v OL 000'000'TS OOZ'TS 30 WnwIXKW v OS 000'o00'TS
2isA0 SSdISOs1 S8OH0 30 000'TS um OZ $ snaa OZZ$ HMO SSdISOsii SSOED 30 000'TS Hsd SZ'$ Si'Id OZES
666'666$ OS 000'00LS HIVE LV'23 0Z£S
666'669$ OS 000'005$ HIV3 SV'I3 OLZS
666'66t S OZ 000'00ES HMI SK'I3 OZZS
666'666$ OS 000'05L$ HIVE SK73 OZZS 666'66Z$ OZ 000'00Z$ HIVE ITI3 WAS
666'6I L$ OZ 000'00S$ HIVE JAM OTIS 666'66T$ Os 000'05T$ HIVE ZVI'I3 OZT$
666'66b$ OZ 000'000 HIVE SV'I3 Z8$ 666'6tTS Os 000'00T$ HIVE SK'I3 OLS
666'66Z$ OZ 000'00T$ sLVU SH'I3 55$ 666'66S os o00'0s$ ssvu LVL oS
666'66S U UNn RIVE SV'I3 8Z$ 666'6t$ xsQNn mvu SK'I3 0£5
SSdISOsii SSOHJ XVI sSNSOI'I SSSNISne SSdISOs2i SSOiIJ XVs sSNsOI'I SsaNISnu
ZNsiMO nasodo Ia
I,
TO: Tom Schwab,
City Manager
FROM: Patrizia Materassi,
Community Development Director
DATE: June 16, 1993
SUBJECT: Comparative Analysis of Fee Schedule
for Planning, Building and Safety & Engineering Departments
RECOMMENDATION: Increase fees to be compatible but still lower than surrounding
jurisdictions.
The attached study is a comparative analysis of the Planning, Building and Safety,
Engineering Departments fees of the City of Grand Terrace compared to the surrounding
Cities of Loma Linda, Colton, San Bernardino, Riverside and Moreno Valley, as well as the
Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside
The goal throughout this proposal is to maintain the lowest fees in the area and staff feels
this has been accomplished as the analysis indicates
The Community Development Department proposes to increase Planning and Building fees
The rationale used for basing increases was either to keep our fee a little lower than the
lowest fee of those studied, select the average of all fees for the City of Grand Terrace in
case of high fee discrepancies or choose a lower average when applicable The lower
average included only immediate surrounding cities as Loma Linda, Colton and San
Bernardino excluding County of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Moreno Valley, to provide
an average among the lower fees
Approximately 33% of the Building and Safety Department fees and 78% of the Planning
Department fees are proposed for increases The Engineer Department was included m this
study however due to the method of processing maps compared to the surrounding cities
most of the increases were applicable to Planning Department processing of maps, therefore,
there are no increases proposed for the Engineering Department fees The fee increases
proposed are geared to bring the City in compatibility with the surrounding areas Overall,
the study indicates that approximately 30% of our current City Building Department fees
are 5-15% below and that 50% of the Planning fees are 200% to 400% below surrounding
cities' fees.
—.�n. trl . 1 4
Please note that there are two inserts proposed for the fee schedule One is to base a
portion of the Building and Safety permit fees on the current UBC Building Permit Fees
Table 3 A, and the other is to include a Code Enforcement Service Fee Schedule from the
City of Colton into the Planning Department Fee Section
The Code Enforcement Service Fee Schedule is to cover City overhead costs of code
enforcement, particularly when dealing with reoccurrence of violations We propose to
implement this by inserting a statement on the Notice of Violation sent out to violators
indicating that they may not only be processed in court and pay fines but may also pay for
staff overhead costs related to the processing of their cases
Please review comparative tabulations attached for the Planning Department fees
(Attachment D), Building and Safety Department fees (Attachment E) and Engineenng
Fees (Attachment F)
PLANNING FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY PERCENT DIFFERENCE
GOAL To maintain the lowest fees in the area.
NOTES (*) An (*) indicates and average was taken of lower fees
(A) An (A) is indicated where an average was used to offset the large
discrepancies between fees
New
Grand T Colton L_Linda San Berdo Cnty SanB Riverside Cnty River Moreno V Proposed
C19903 [19923 [1992] C1993] C1993] [1992] (1993] C1993I Fee
dmu ative
ite & Architecture S100.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $575.00 S200.00
tandard Site &
rchitectural n/a $323.00 n/a $1,001.00 n/a $3,165.00
ass than 500 sq ft S100.00 $140.00 n/a n/a n/a C$132/lot] n/a ($310/acre] $260.00
s 500-1499 sq ft $250.00 $330.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $640 00
s 1500-2999 sq ft. $400 00 $525.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,020 00
reater 3,000 sq ft $550.00 $725.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a A $1,400.00
onditional Use Permit
dninistrative: $100.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a S200.00
tandard Conditional
se Permit: $550.00 $1,950.00 $2,000.00 $1,379.00 $3,150.00 $3,300.00 $7,365.00 $3,165.00
[S35/lot] ($66/lot] [S5/lot] C$310/acre]
s le DO sq ft S100 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $260.00
s 5C P9 sq ft S250.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $650.00
s 1500-2999 sq ft. S400.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,430 00
reater 3000 sq ft $550 00 n/a n/a n/a $3,150.00 n/a n/a n/a * $2,000.00
ariance
ign Variance S100.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
nor Deviation S100 00 S110 00 $250_00 5398 00 S465 00 5341 00 n/a $300 00 + A $300 00
andard Variances 5680 00 $1 000 00 5744 00 52 640 00 Si 331 00 51 383 00 52 355 00 A $1,450 00
less 500 sc -- SiOC 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $0 00
500-1499 sc -- 5250 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a S0 00
- 1500-2999 sc -- 5-.00 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a SO 00
water 3000 sc -- 5550 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a i/a $0 00
eneral Plan Amen Si 250 00 51 800.00 S1 750.00 (dir cost] $6,000 00 S3 190 00 56 851 00 S9 170.00 * $1,900 00
[515/ac] (deposit]
---- ---------- ------ --- - -- - ---- -- - ---- - --
,ne Change 5 000 00 51 375 00 $1 200 00 [dir cost] $6 000 00 51 760 00 54 130 00 $4 590 00 * $1,300 00
($35/lot] ($26/acre]
aec fic Plans ° zCC C- 53 278 00 55 000 00 (dir cost] 520 OCC OC Sio 054 00 S - -75 00 541 600 00 $3,000 00
s-a•- -im(deposit -i (5QO/lot [deposit' C* staff]
(time]
rhour rate
oecific Plan Anienc S750 00 51,375.00 n/a (dir cost] n/a S3 850 00 517 T78 00 510 400 00 $1,350 00
(deposit]
etermination Use t150 00 $165 00 n/a $286 00 (act cost] n/a n/a n/a
* $225 00
nvironmental Assess/
y: Neclaration S100 00 S425 00 n/a S1,250 00 S2,300 00 S253_00 n/a S3,075_00 $400 00
_ _ -. A . . r _ IIIIMIk (+ $30 F8(
CITY OF GRANO TERRACE PLANNING FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Grand T Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty Sang Riverside Cnty River Moreno V
[1990] [1992] [1992] [1993] [1993] [1992] [1993] [1993]
Envir Impact Report $500 00 [cost] [20% cost] [dir cost] $7,800 00 S15,400 00 $8,296 00 $12,480 00 [same]
[consult] [deposit] [deposit] [+ staff
[$2,000] time]
[deposit]
Tentative Map
Preliminary Review $300.00 n/a $440.00 $345.00 n/a $4,290.00 n/a n/a
Minor Subdivision $250 00 S800 00 $1,000.00 $970.00 $3,300 00 $3,630.00 $4,203 00 $5,140.00 $250 00
($35/lot] [deposit] ($45/parc] ($115/lot] ($88/lot] (+ l ot
[resident]
(+ hourly]
[eng. $450]
($100/parl
[Commercial]
$5,000.00
[deposit]
[commercial]
[+ hourly]
[eng. $775]
[S60/lot]
($10/9 lot]
Major Subdivision. $350.00 $1,375.00 $5,000.00 $1,724.00 S8,700.00 $4,290.00 S8,455 00 $5,765.00 * $1 0
[525/lot] [S35/lot] [deposit] [$45/lot] [deposit] ($66/tot] [average] ($88/lot] [+ ' ot
[+ hourly] [S45/lot]
[eng $775]
($60/lot]
($10/g lot]
Revised Tentative mac
Minor $350 00 n/a [1/4 fee] [50% fee] $2,100 00 $2 Z00 00 S1 585 00 $3 355 00
[deposit] ($44/lot] [average]
Major S7'0 00 n/a 1/4 fee] 50% fee] $2,100 00 $2,200 00 $6,190 00 S3 355 00
[deposit] ($44/tot] [average]
Final Map
Minor Subdivision 5250 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5535 00 n/a
(parcel]
Major Subdivision 535C C: ^/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5535 00 n/a
525 (parcel]
Lot Line Adjustment S200 00 n/a $300.00 $286.00 $1,310 00 n/a S1 133 00 n/a A $750 00
[deposit] [$45/lot]
[+ hourly]
[eng $450]
Lot Merger. $200 00 n/a $300.00 n/a S720 00 n/a 5651 00 n/a A $500 00
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Grand T Colton L.Linda San Berdo Cnty SanB Riverside Cnty River Moreno V
[1990] [1992] (1992] C1993] [1993] [1992] (1993] (1993]
[deposit]
C+ hourly]
(eng $450]
Zeversion Acreage- $200.00 n/a n/a n/a $1,500 00 $4,290.00 $950.00 n/a $500.0C
Certificate of
Cow( ce- $200.00 n/a S600.00 n/a $590.00 $1,826-00 S664.00 n/a A $900 OC
[deposit]
[+ hourly]
[eng $650]
Extensions. $100 00 $200.00 $500.00 [10% fee] $200 00 $528.00 $334 00 $2,495.00 $200 OC
(subdiv]
[deposit]
(+ hourly]
S100.00
Call others]
Sign Permit $100.00 S85.00 $45.00 n/a n/a n/a S365.00
Less 32 sq ft. $50.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a $297.00 n/a n/a
greater 32 sq ft. $100 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a $627.00 n/a n/a $200 OC
Sign Program. S100.00 $450.00 $400.00 $275.00 n/a S924.00 n/a $505.00 * $370.0C
Sig approved
Sig, _gram $10.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Temporary Sign S50.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $30.00
[deposit]
Land Use Application/
Plan Check of
corking Drawings S10 00 [25% of] n/a $34 00 n/a n/a n/a n/a [25% B&S]
[Building] [S33 mini
<evisions other thar
-laps or minor design
alterations
aominictrative S100 00 5175 00 [24% fee] S229 00 n/a n/a S669 00 n/a * $200 0(
-,ublic $100 00 S300.00 [24% fee] $229 00 n/a n/a 51,181 00 n/a * S200 0(
Acpeal of
lanntng Director's
)ecision $100 00 [75% of] 5300 00 $115 00 Si 000 00 S616 00 S415 00 $500 00 A S490 Ot
[apol]
,ome Occupatior
-ermit S5C CC S25 OC 530 00 $172 00 " E n/a -/E S40 00
nterpretation
Planning Commission n/a $275 00 n/a n/a S575 00 Si 177 00 n/a n/a
City Council Level n/a $275 00 n/a n/a $575 00 Si 177 00 n/a n/a
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
GOAL To maintain the lowest fees in the area except in cases of high fee
discrepancies where an average is proposed.
NOTES.
(A) An (A) is indicated where an average was used to offset the large
discrepancies between the fees. The County of San Bernardino was
excluded from the average due to extremely high fees. Neu
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty SanS River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
(no Info)
EE DEPOSIT
inor project: $25.00
ajor project: $100.00
UILDING PERMIT
CHEDULE
$1,000 OR LESS $26.00 $15.00 $15.00 $59.85 $15.00 $15.00 NA
(2.00/add] 2.00/ADD]
[100] [100]
$1,001 TO $2,000. $26.00 $15.00 $27.00 $59.85 $15.00 $27.00 $15.00
2.40/add] 2.00/add] (2.00/ADO] (5.25/ADO] (10.00/add]2.00/ADO] (2.00/ADD]
[1,0003 [1,000] (100] (1001 (500] (100] (100]
$2,001 TO $25,000: $53.00 S45.00 $54.00 $112.35 $45.00 $54.00 $45.00
(8.00/add] [9.00/addl 2.00/ADO] (16.80/AD0](9.00/add] (9.00/ADO] (9.00/ADD]
(1,000] (1,000] (100] (1,000] [1000] 11,0001 (1,000]
25,000 to $50,000: $230.00 $253_50 $258.00 $498.75 $252.00 $285.00 $252.00 UBC
[7 00/add] (6 50/add] (6.00/ADD] (15.75/ADD](65.00/add](6.50/ADO] (6.50/ADD]
(1,000] (1,000] (1,000] (1,0001 (10,000] (1,000] [1,000]
50,000 to S100 000 5395 00 5414.50 5419 00 5892.50 5414 50 5419.00 5414 50 USC
(3 60/add] (4 50/add] CO 00/ADD] [8 40/ADD] (45 00/add][C4 50/A0D]C4 50/ADD]
Cl 000] Cl 000] Cl 000] C1 000] C10,000] C1 000] C1 0001
100 000 or greater 5593 00 5639 50 S643 00 S1 312.50 S639 50 S643.00 5639 50 UBC
[2 40/add] [3 50/add] (3.50/ADD] (5 25/ADD] [35 00/add][3 50/ADD] 3 50/ADD]
(' _20] [1 000] [1 000] [1,000] (lu u00] [1,000] [1,000]
'LAN REVIEW [90%/Perm ]C65%/PERM] (75%/PERM] (90%/PERM] NA [75%/PERM] (100%PERM]
1EVISIONS $35 00[HR] $50 00[HR] NA SZ8 00 NA $30 00 NA
[MIN 1/2HR] [PER 1/2HR] (PER HR] ==r---
LECTRICAL PERMITS NEC [BASED ON]
(LrORK VAL
SERVICE SWITCH 600
VOLTS OR LESS NOT
OVER 200 AMPS $13 00 NA $18 50 $29 00 S12 00 518.50 S18_50 S18.00
[9 00/add]
SERVICE SWITCH 600
VOLTS OR LESS OVER
200 AMPS. $33 00 NA $37 50 569 00 $25 00 537 50 $37.50 $37.00
SFRV1rF SWITCH OVER
C6 00/add] Attachment E
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Cotton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San6 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee ---
MPS_ $66.00 NA $75.00 $140.00 S50.00 $75.00 $75.00 $74.00
(25.00/add] - _
ACTUAL AREA
IAREHOUSE,STORAGE
1ARA AIR CRAFT
TANG [ 005/SOFT] NA (.015/SOFT][.01/SOFT] (.02/SOFT] [ 0075/SF] (.010](A)
[PLUS SERV][PLUS SERV] -
PCCUPANCIES NOT LISTED
IP TO 5,000 SO FT (.025/SOFT] NA (.035/SOFT][.11/SOFT] NA [.0225/SF] (.055](A)
[PLUS SERV][PLUS SERV]
CCUPANCIES NOT LISTED
PIER 5,000 SO FT: (.01/SOFT] NA (.035/SOFT](.08/SOFT] NA (.0075/SF)
[PLUS SERV][+ 550.00] (< 20,000]
'LAN REVIEW FEES (50% ELECT] NA NA [504 ELECT] NA (25X ELECT][100XELECT]
iLTERNATIVE FEE
1CHEDULE WHERE NO
;TRUCTURAL WORK DONE
INIT APPLICATION.
00 $2.40 NA $0.75 $7.00 NA $3.00 $3.00 ($3.50](A
101-10. $7 00 NA $7.50 $1.52 $5.00 $7.50 $7.50 $10.00
(+ 5.06] [3.00/10] -
10.01-50: S13.00 NA $28.50 $1.01 NA $15.00 $15.00 $15.00
(+ 15.32] -
50.01-100. $26.00 NA $51.00 S0.50 NA $30.50 S30.00 $29.00
(+ 45 72]
101 AND OVER S40 00 Na C 45 EACH] $0 50 NA 545 00 5100 00 S44 00
C+ 45 72]
TEMPORARY FEES
TEMPORARY OR CONSTRUCTION
SERVICE S13 00 NA $15 00 S29 00 $15 00 $15 00 S15 00
APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY
JSE OF PERMANENT SERVICE
EQUIPMENT S80 00 5120 00 NA S19 00 NA $15 00 NA
IISCELLANEOUS FEES
AREA LIGHTINC
STANDARDS. 5.4 00 NA NA $11 00 S10 00 $5_00 NA [7_50](A)
PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL
SWIMMING POOLS $13 00 NA NA $29 00 $25.00 $20 00 $30 00 (25_00](A
COMMERCIAL SWIMMING
POOLS $26 00 NA NA $56.00 $25 00 $30.00 NA
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty Sane River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
tEMPORARY SALES
,TAND: $20.00 NA HA $41.00 NA $15.00 NA
INSPECTION OF IDLE
4ETER: S8.00 NA $11.00 119.00 NA NA HA S11.00
OVERHEAD LINE CONSTR
TOLES AND ANCHORS EA $50 00 NA NA $11 00 NA $5.00 NA
FEE FOR ELECT WORK NOT
'ROVIDED IN SCHEDULE $20 00 NA NA $41.00 NA NA $11.00
ILLUMINATED SIGNS
VEW, RELOCATED OR
4LTERED SIGNS NA NA $15.00 NA $15.00 $15.00 $15.00
C3.00/ADD]
].00-5 SOFT. $9 00 NA NA $20.00 NA NA 59 00
5.01-25 SOFT $11.00 NA NA (.40 SOFT] NA NA S10.00
(+ CUM TOT]
25.01-50 SOFT: $13.00 NA NA ( 17 SOFT] NA NA S12.00
(+ CUM TOT]
50.01-100 SOFT $18.00 NA NA (.17 SOFT] NA NA $14.00
(+ CUM TOT] ,
100 01-200 SOFT $21 00 NA NA C.13 SOFT] NA NA $14.00
(+ CUM TOT] C.04SF/ADD]
200 01-300 SOFT $24 00 NA NA E.13 SOFT] NA NA NA
(+ CUM TOT]
300 01 AND OVER
(PER SO FT) SO 07 NA NA C 13 SOFT] NA NA NA
[+ CUM TOT]
PLUMBING PERMITS UPC
EACH PLUMBING FIXT $6 00 NA $6 00 $12 00 $5 00 $6 00 S6.00
EACH SEWER CONNECT S13 00 S2,800 00 $15 00 S8 00 NA $15 00 $15 00
[MINIMUM] C69 00 MIN]
EACH PRIVATE SEWER
_INE, OVER 5 BLDGS S33 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
EACH BLDG SEWER CDNNEC
OVER 10 BLDGS $3.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
PRIVATE SEWAGE LIFT
STATION UP TO 1HP S7 00 NA NA S4 00 NA NA NA
(19 00 MIN]
OVER 1HP, ADO PER HP $1.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA ,
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San8 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
ACH CESSPOOL $20 00 NA $22.50 $41.00 $25.00 $22.50 $22.50 $22.00
ACH SEPTIC TANK. $20.00 NA NA $41.00 NA NA NA
RIVATE SEWAGE
ISPOSAL. $40.00 NA $45.00 NA $50.00 $45.00 $45.00 $44.00
ACM WATER HEATER
ND OR VENT S6.00 NA $7 50 $19 00 NA $7.50 $7.50 $7 50
AS PIPING OUTLET
TO 5 OUTLETS. $7 00 NA $3.00 $4.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00
(19.00 MIN][.75/ADD]
OR MORE OUTLETS. $1.00 MA $0.75 NA MA $0.75 $0.75 S7 00
[r $1/out
NDUSTRIAL WASTE
RETREATMENT $9.00 NA $12.00 $19 00 NA $12.00 $12.00 $11.00
NSTALL, ALTER OR REPAIR
ATER PIPING $6.00 NA $3 00 $19 00 $5 00 NA $3.00
RIVA ATER DISTRIBUTION
COVE CONNECTIONS. $33.00 NA NA $69.00 NA NA NA
[miN
VER 10 CONNECTION
EACH) $3.00 NA NA S69 00 NA NA NA $33.00
[min]
JBLIC SWIM POOL 546 00 NA NA $97 00 NA NA NA
RIVATE SWIM POOL $33 00 NA NA S69 00 NA NA S45 00 S44.00
=PAIR AND ALTERATION
F DRAINAGE OR VENT S7 00 NA NA $19 00 $5 00 $3 00 $3 00
AWN SPRINKLER S8 00 NA $9 00 $19 00 S8 00 $9 00 $9 00
4CUUM BREAKERS OR
iCKFLOW PROTECTION
5 $7 00 NA NA NA S8 00 $7 50 S7 50
/ER 5, EACH S1 00 NA NA S19 00 $2.00 $1 50 Si 50
[min] [EACH]
MERE NO PLAN REVIEW FEE
3 CHARGED AS LISTED [50% perm] $50.00 NA [50% perm] NA NA NA
[HOUR]
-CHANICAL PERMITS
ISTALL OR RELOCATE
RNACE OR BURNER
TO 100,000 BTUS S8 00 NA $9 00 NA $9 00 NA $9 00 S8.50
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San8 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
INSTALL OR RELOCATE
FURNACE OR BURNER
OVER 100,000 BTUS. $9.00 NA $11.00 NA $11.00 NA $11.00 S10 00
INSTALL OR RELOCATE
FLOOR FURNACE. S8 00 NA $9.00 $19.00 $9.00 NA $9.00 $8.50
INSTALL OR RELOCATE
SUSPENDED HEATER, WALL OR
FLOOR HEATER $8 00 NA $9 00 $19 00 $9 00 NA $11.00 [9.60](A)
INSTALL OR RELOCATE
APPLIANCE VENTS $4 00 NA $4.50 $11 00 $5 00 NA $4.50 $4.50
REPAIR, ALTERATION TO EACH
HEATING APPL, REFRIGERATION
UNIT OR HEATING AND COOLING
SYSTEM AND INSTALL
CONTROLS. $8.00 NA NA $19 00 $9 00 NA $9 00 $8.50
INSTALL OR RELOCATE
BOILER OR COMPRESSOR
3 HP 100,000 BTUS. $8 00 NA NA $29 00 S9.00 NA $9.00 $8.50
DVER 3 HP TO 15 HP
DVER 100,000 BTUS
INCLUDE 500,000 BTUS. $13 00 NA NA $29 00 $16 50 NA $16.50 $16.00
OVER 15 HP TO 30 HP
OVER 500,000 BTUS INCLUDE
1,000,000 BTUS $18 00 NA NA $57 00 NA NA $22 50 S22_SO
OVER 30 HP TO 50 HP OVER
1,000,000 BTUS INCLUDE
1,750,000 BTUS $26 00 NA NA $57 00 $33.50 NA $33 50 5.3 .J0
OVER 50 HP OVER 1,750,000
3TUS S44 00 NA NA $57 00 $56 50 NA $56 00 S55 50
SIR HANDLING UNIT NA NA $6 50 $23 00 S6 50 NA NA
10,000 CUBIC FT/MIN S6 50 NA NA NA $11 00 NA S6.50
OVER 10,000 CUBIC
'T/MON $10 OC NA NA NA NA NA $11 00
VAPORATIVE COOLER S6 50 NA S6 50 $19 00 S6 50 NA S6_50
IENTII.ATION FAN S4 00 NA S4 50 $11 00 S4 50 NA S4 50
VENTILATION SYSTEM NOT
'ART OF A HEATING AND
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Cotton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San8 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
Z CONDITION. $6.50 NA NA $19 00 NA NA $6.50
STALL MECHANICAL EXHAUST
]D $7.00 NA NA $19.00 $6.50 NA $6.50
'E 1 - _4SE H000/
MUST SYSTEM $20 00 NA $9 00 $41 00 NA NA NA
STALL OR RELOCATE
dESTIC-TYPE
NERATOR. $9 00 NA NA NA $11.00 NA $11.00 S10.00
TALL OR RELOCATE
1NERC. INDUST -
'E INCINERATOR- $33 00 NA NA NA $45.00 NA $45.00 S44.00
:H APPL OR PIECE OF
JIPMENT REGULATED BY
E UNIFORM MECH. CODE
r NOT LISTED' $7.00 NA NA $19 00 $6.50 NA $6.50
aN IL __H FEE. [50X FEE] NA NA [50% FEE] NA NA [100% FEE]
.DING PERMITS
100 CUBIC YARDS $20.00 $50 00 NA $41 00 NA $15 00 $22 50
[7 50/ADD]
(50CUB]
1-1 000 CUBIC YARD $20 00 $100.00 NA $284 00 NA $33 00 $22 50
(12 50/ADD] (10 50/ADD] [10 50/ADD]
(100 CUYDI [1000UBYD] [100CY]
J01-10,000 CUB lu S129 00 $1UU 00 NA $527 00 $126 00 $117 00
[12.00/ADD][9.00/ADD] (9 00/ADD' 00/ADD]
C1,000CUYDI[1,000CUYD] [1,000CY] [1,000CY]
,001-100,000 C YD $238 00 $181 00 NA $1,283 00 NA $238 50 $198 00
(40 00/ADO] (40 50/ADD] (40 50/ADD] [40 50/ADO]
(10,000CY] [10,000CY] [10,000CY] [10,000CY]
0 001 CUBIC YARDS
D OVER S594 00 S562.50 NA $1,283 00 NA $532 50 $562 50
(20 00/AD0](22.50/ADD] [41 00/ADO] [22 50/ADD] [22 50/ADD]
[10 000C"] (100 000CY] [10,000CY] (10 000CY] (10 000CY]
AN REVIEW FEE
00 CUBIC YARDS $13 00 NA NA $14 35 NA S15 00 $15 00
)1-1,000 CUBIC YARD $26 00 NA NA $99 40 NA $22 50 $22 50
001-100,000 CUB $26 00 NA NA $449 05 NA $30 00 $30 00
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San6 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
[17.00/ADD] [15 00/ADD]
[10,000CUB] [10,000]
100,001-200,000CUB $175.00 NA NA [35% perm] NA $174.00 $30.00
[12.00/ADD] [9 00/ADD] [15.00/ADD]
[10,000CUB] [10,000] [10,000]
200,001 CUBIC YARDS
AND OVER $296 00 NA NA [35X perm] NA $255 00 $255.00
[6 00/ADD] [4 50/ADD] [4.50/ADD]
[10,000CUB] [10,000] [10,000]
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS
PERMIT ISSUANCE FEES NA $10.00 NA $29 00 NA NA NA
IN ADDITION TO FEES
PRESCRIBED: $13 00
MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY
PERMIT. $33 00 $50.00 NA $69 00 NA NA NA
FIELD INSPECTION AND
REPORT. $53.00 $50.00 NA $110-00 NA NA NA S8O.O%6
[HR7
SHORT TERM INSTALLATIONS
TEMPORARY, CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL PROCESSING $110 00 NA NA $231 00 NA NA NA
APPROVED TEMP TENTS S66 00 $140 00
SPECIAL INSPECTION
AP°OVALS. $26 00 $50 O0[HR] NA $56 00 NA NA $50 00
CHIN 2 k _ [HOUR]
STANDARD PLANS
FEE TO ESTABLISH STANDARD
PLAN $40 00 NA NA $84 00 NA NA NA
COMPARISON PLAN REVIEW
FEE S13 00 NA NA $29 00 NA NA NA
ANNUAL REVIEW $40 DO NA NA S84 00 NA NA NA
SERVICE CHARGE FOR CASH
DEPOSITS AND OTHER
SURETIES: S33 00 NA NA $69 00 NA NA NA
RELOCATION INSPECTION
FEE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San6 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
THE SAME PROPERTY S66 00 NA NA $140 00 NA NA NA
DM ONE PROPERTY TO
OTHER WITHIN CITY $132.00 NA NA $279.00 NA NA NA
OM CuTSIDE CITY $198 00 NA NA $419.00 NA NA NA
T-DOWN PERMIT FEES NA [50%/VALI NA NA NA NA NA
[10,000]
(BOND]
3 OCCUPANCY UP TO
000 SOFT AREA $198 00 NA NA $419 00 NA NA NA
3 OCCUPANCIES 2,001
FT AND OVER $330 00 NA NA $698.00 NA NA NA
1 OCCUPANCIES S66.00 NA NA $140.00 NA NA NA
HER OCCUPANCIES [BASED ON ] NA NA [BASED ON] NA NA NA
(EVALUAT ] [EVALUAT.]
NUAL ITS.
10 EMPLOYEES. $132.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
-75 EMPLOYEES 5264 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
-150 EMPLOYEES. $396 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
1-300 EMPLOYEES S666.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
HABILITATION AND DEMOLITION
DCESSING FEES
EPARATION OF JOB
ECIFICATION S198 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
TY COUNCIL APPROV 561 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
NTRACT PERFORMANCE
iPECTION 561 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
_LING FEE $33 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA
:ORD SPECIAL
iIGNMENT Sx 00 NA NA NA NA MA NA
IE, HOOD FENCE S20 00 NA NA S41 00 NA NA NA
(EA LOT]
IIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
'ROACH 533 00 NA NA 569 00 NA NA NA
n tasirnnn l!v C nnfL l.....
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty SanB River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
'ESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS
1DJUSTED FLOOR AREA FACTORS
IVING AREA $1 00 UBC
d1RAGES AND STORAGE $0.50 UBC
'ORCH,PATIO,CARPORT SO 20 UBC
tAISED FLOOR DECKING SO 20 UBC
.LAB ONLY FOR RECORD S0 10
tASONRY FIREPLACE,
'ETAINING WALL,FENCE $0 20 UBC
1IR SUPPORT, FILM COVERED
1GRICULT BUILDINGS $0 10 UBC
)THER AGRICULT BLDG $0 20 UBC
SWIMMING POOLS ACCESSORY TO A
.INGLE FAMILY DWELLING
IITH STANDARD PLAN $191 00 NA NA $279 00 NA NA NA
)THER THAN A STANDARD
'LAN. $218 00 NA NA 5335 00 NA NA NA
ILL OTHER SWIMMING POOLS
IITH STANDARD PLAN $191.00 NA $125.00 S404 00 NA NA NA
)THER THEN A STANDARD
'LAN $218 00 NA NA $460 00 NA NA NA
>PAS, HOT TUBS
+ITH GAS HOOKUP S66 00 NA $75 00 $140 00 NA NA NA
ELF CONTAINED S33 00 NA $75 00 $140 00 NA NA NA
:ESIDENTIAL ALUMINUM PATIO PERMITS
'LAN REVIEW,ISSUANCE S40 00 NA NA S85 00 NA NA NA
OUNTY STANDARD, AND
NTERNATIONAL S33 00 NA NA $74 00 NA NA NA
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L Linda San Berdo Cnty San8 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee
OLAR ENERGY PERMITS
OLLECTORS- $9.00
-1,000 SQFT S4.00 NA S3.00 NA NA S4 50 NA
,001-2,000 SOFT $7.00 NA S5.00 NA NA NA NA
,001-SOFT AND OVER. $7.00 NA $5.00 NA NA NA NA
[2 00/ADD] [1.00/ADD]
[1,000SQFT] [1,000SQFT]
'ORAGE TANKS $9 00
750 GALLONS $3 00 NA $2.00 NA NA $3 00 NA
;1-2,000 GAL S4 00 NA $3.00 NA NA $4.50 NA
000 GAL AND OVER $4.00 NA $3.00 NA NA S4.50 NA
[2 00/ADD] [1.00/ADD]
[1,000GAL] [1,000GAL7
R ROCK STORAGE. $9 00
1,500 CUB FT $3.00 NA $2.00 NA NA S3.00 NA
501-3,000 CUBFT $4.00 NA $3.00 NA NA S4 50 NA
001 CUBFT AND OVER. S4 00 NA $3.00 NA NA $4 50 NA
2 00/ADD] [1.00/ADD]
[1,000CUB] [1,000CUB]
PLI REGULATED BY
IFORM SOLAR ENERGY
OE NO FEE LISTED $3.00 NA NA S9.00 HA S3.00 NA
AN REVIEW FEE [50% PERM] NA NA [50% PERM] NA [50% PERM] NA
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
ENGINEERING FEES
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
GOAL- To malntnin the lowest fees in the area.
New
Proposed
G Terrace Colton L. Linda San Berdo Cnty SanB River Cnty River Moreno V Fee:
entative Map
****lla*#****,ret**t
reliminary Review- $500.00 Planning Planning Planning Planning
Fee Fee Fee Fee
inor Subdivision
parcel). $250 00 $500.00 Is 11 N «
[$30/lot]
ajor Subdivision
tract): $1,000 00 $500.00 11 u " u
($30/lot]
evised Tentative
ap (minor): S250.00 11 " /1 S850.00
evised Tentative
ap (Major): $1,000.00 11 11 " S850.00
final Map
****+r *****,Inir A A
inor Subdivision S416 00 $250 00 $700 00 $1,000 00 $1,301 00 $1,275 00
[26 00/lot] C$Z0/lot] [$40/lotl C+ $30/lot] [+ 584 70/ [+ $26/lot]
parcel]
ajor Subdivision Actual Cost 5400 00 51 000 00 $1,000 00 S1,089_00 S1 275 00
[deb $200] [$30/lot] [+ $1 200] C+ $30/lot] [+ 72 60/ [+ 25 ot]
[15 00/lot] or [$40/lo*i nu -
[$1000/min] [actual] letter lot]
[deposit] [cost]
eferred Montmentation
0 lots or less 5150 OC NA NA Na 5200 00 5% of bone
or S250 min
1 lots or greater $3,000 00 NA NA NA $125 00 5% of bond
($130/tot] or S250 min
.ot tine Adjustments- $250 00 S970.00
Attachment F
Engineering fees
New
Proposed
G Terrace Cotton L. Linda San 8erdo Cnty San8 River Cnty River Moreno V Fee:
it M $50 00 $985.00
*** r***
version to acreage. 5250 00 $800.00
gn Permit
nelectrtcal- $100.00
ectric. 5100 00
ading Plan,Revised $150 00 0-5,000c1,= $500 0-5,000cy
***1 ********** = $650
5,001-100,000cy= 5,001-100,000cy
$750.00 = $1,080
over 100,000cy= over 100,000cy
$1,000 = $1,080 + $50/
(+ 540/10,000cy 10,000cy
over 1,000,000]
:ltc Improvement Fees -
)0 to 25,000 [4%] [4%] [0-5,000 = $500] (4%] $759 00
C+ 4 84%]
001 to 100,000 (3 5%] (4%1 C5,001-10,000 = (4%] 51 969 00
5750 00] (+ 2 2%]
),001 and greater [3%] [4%] (10,000-25 000 [4%] (100 000-200 000
= 6%] = S3 619 - 2 2%
over 100 000]
(25,001-75,000= C200,000-300,000
$1,500 + 5% over = $5,819 + 2 2%
$25,000] over 200 000]
C75,001-125,000 C300,000-and up
= $4,000 + 4.15% = S8,019 + 2.2%
over $75,000] over 300 000]
[125,001-200,000
= $6,075 + 3 3%
over $125,000]
[200,000-and up
= $8,550 +2.15%
over $200,000]
Sample of a $100,000************************** *****************
project *$3,500.00 *$4,000.00 * $5,037.50 *$4,000.00 * * $4,169.00 *
************************************************** *4***************
I
0eferment/Watver- $60 00
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ESTABLISHING A
COMPREHENSIVE SCHEDULE FOR FEES, TAXES, AND
FINES FOR PERMITS, LICENSES, SERVICES,
FACILITIES, AND ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
Section 1. Title 4 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code is hereby amended and the
revised chapters 4 08, 4 12, 4 24, 4 44, 4 76, 4 88 and 4 96 which are included herewith as
Exhibit A are hereby adopted
Section 2. Conflicts and Ambiguities - In the event of any conflicts or ambiguities
between the provisions of the Ordinance and other provisions of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail Each separate violation shall be a separate
offense
Section 3. Violations - Violation of this Ordinance shall be an infraction and punishment
shall not exceed those provided in Grand Terrace Municipal Code Chapter 1 16
Section 4. Severability - If any provision or clause of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional or to be otherwise invalid
by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other Ordinance provisions
or clauses or applications thereof which can be implemented without the invalid provisions or
clause or application, and of this end the provisions and clauses of the Ordinance are declared
to be severable
Section 5. Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12 01 AM
on the 31st day of its adoption
Section 6. Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3)
public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purposes by the
the City Council
Section 7 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City and held on
the 12th day of August, 1993 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said
City Council on the 26th day of August, 1993
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 2
ATTEST
City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City Council Terrace and of the City
thereof Council thereof
I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of August, 1993, by the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
City Clerk
Approved as to form
City Attorney
Exhibit A
CHAPTER 4.08
BUSINESS LICENSE TAX
Sections
4 08 010 General
4 08 020 Rentals
4 08 030 Flat rate tax schedule
4 08 040 Penalty
4 08 050 Exemptions
4 08 060 Duplicate license fees
4 08 070 Amended licenses
4 08 010 General A Any person, firm or corporation conducting or carrying on
business within the city shall be charged a business license tax based upon the following
schedule
B Gross Receipts Tax Schedule Each person conducting or carrying on a fixed
business location located in the city shall pay a business license tax based upon their annual
gross receipts as follows
Business License Tax Gross Receipts
$30 00 Flat Rate Under $49,999
$50.00 Flat Rate $50,000 to $99,999
$70 00 Flat Rate $100,000 to $149,999
$120 00 Flat Rate $150,000 to $199,999
$170 00 Flat Rate $200,000 to $299,999
$220 00 Flat Rate $300,000 to $499,999
$270 00 Flat Rate $500,000 to $699,999
$320 00 Flat Rate $700,000 to $999,999
$320 00 plus $ 25 per $1,000 of gross receipts over $1,000,000 to
a maximum of$1,200
4 08 020 Rentals Each person who owns multiple residential units (two or more) or
property or improvements within the city who receives any rental income therefrom, however
such income is designated or collected, shall, for the purpose of paying a business license tax,
have all such income taxed under the gross receipts provisions as if such person were conducting
or carrying on business at a fixed location within the city Rental income shall include the value
of the compensation or return for the use of real property or improvements thereon.
4 08 030 Flat Rate Tax Schedule Each person carrying on or conducting any business
within the city and not having been specifically taxed under any other chapter of this title shall
Type of Business Fee
Auctioneer $25 00 per day
Outdoor festival, carnival, circus $150 00 per day
Itinerant food concessions
(Fairs, circuses, special events and
traveling shows)
Per concession, per location $20 00 per event
Contractor, state licensed General and
Engineering $150 00 annually
All other $80 00 annually
Dancing (Public, without charge) $25 00 per quarter
Dancing (Public for profit) $10 00 per day or
$35 00 per quarter
Delivery by vehicle $35 00 annually per vehicle
Handbill distributor $20 00 per day
Peddler/Solicitor $40 00 per quarter
Professional, outside (e g engineer,
physician, surveyor) $80 00 annually
Real estate broker $50 00 annually
Security services $80 00 annually
Service company (e g landscape, pool
service) $50 00 annually
Swap meet $80 00 annually
Transportation, passenger $50 00 annually
Business office $50 00 annually
Billboard $1,500 00 per side, annually
Any other $50 00 annually
4 08 040 Penalty Failure to pay a business license tax when due shall result in a
penalty of ten percent of the license tax on the last day of each month after the due date The
amount of the penalty shall not exceed fifty percent of the amount of the license tax due
4 08 050 Exemptions Each business which has annual gross receipts of less than one
thousand dollars shall not be required to pay a business license tax
4 08 060 Duplicate license fees Each person seeking a duplicate of a previously issued
license shall pay a duplicate license fee of fifteen dollars
4 08 070 Amended license Each person seeking to have their business license amended
to conduct business at a new location shall pay a fee of fifteen dollars
CHAPTER 4.12
LICENSES AND PERMITS
Sections
4 12 010 Fees designated
4 12 010 Fees designated A. The following fees must accompany the applications, an
additional fee may be required whenever a background investigation requires access to certain
records
1 Home occupation permit (Chapter 5 06) $50 00
Business license also required as per Chapter 5 04,
2 Bingo license (Chapter 5 08)
a. Initial fee $50 00
b Renewal fee $25 00
3 Carnivals, shows and other entertainments $150 00
(Chapter 5 16) Business license also
required as per Chapter 5 04,
4 Dancehalls (Chapter 5 20) ,$50 00
Business license also required as per Chapter 5 04,
5 Distress sales (Chapter 5 24) $50 00
Business license also required as per Chapter 5 04,
6 Entertainment license (Chapter 5 28) $50 00
7 Fortune telling license (Chapter 5 36) $75 00
Business license also required as per Chapter 5 04;
8 Garage/Yard sale permit (Chapter 5 40) $5 00
9 Junk and secondhand dealers (Chapter 5 44) $50 00
Business license also required per Chapter 5 04,
10 Massage parlor (Chapter 5 48) Business license $75 00
also required per Chapter 5 04,
11 Massage technician (Chapter 5 48) $50 00
12 Outdoor festivals (Chapter 5 60) $125 00
Business license also required per Chapter 5 04,
13 Peddling, soliciting and hawking license $50 00
(Chapter 5 64) Business license also required
per chapter 5 04,
14 Pool and billiard halls (Chapter 5 68) $50 00
Business license also required per Chapter 5 04
B The following fines have been established for failure to obtain permits
1 Illegal garage/yard sale (Chapter 5 40) $40 00
2 Holding a festival without license (Chapter 5 60) $550 00
3 Soliciting without a permit (Chapter 5 64) $150 00
r
Chapter 4.24
ALARM DEVICES AND SYSTEMS
Sections
4 24 010 Service charge--Imposed
4 24 010 Service charge--Imposed There shall be a $55 00 service charge based on
police or fire staff time, assessed against the alarm user when a police or fire response occurs
as a result of a third or subsequent false alarm from an alarm system at the same address or
location within any six consecutive calendar month penod
4
Chapter 4 44 1
PARKING CITATION FINES
Sections.
4 44 010 General
4 44 020 Fines designated
4 44 010 General Bail must be posted and request to appear in court must be made ten
days to thirty days from date of issuance of the citation A citation shall become delinquent if
bail is not paid within thirty days An additional penalty shall be assessed and a vehicle
registration hold shall be filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles, if not paid within sixty
days
4 44 020 Fines designated The following fines have been established
Del P A on
Code* Description of Citation Bail Bail Hold Amt
21113 Overnight parking--Civic Center $15 00 $30 00 $45 00
21458-A Parking--Red zone $18 50 $37 00 $60 00
21458-B Parking—Yellow zone $20 50 $41 00 $65 00
21458-C Parlang—White zone $20 50 $41 00 $65 00
21458-D Parking--Green zone $20 50 $41 00 $65 00
22500 Any overtime parking $15 00 $30 00 $45 00
22500-A Stopping within intersection $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-B Stopping on crosswalk $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-C Parking in red zone between
safety zone $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-D Parking within 15 feet of fire
station driveway $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-E Stopping in public/private
driveway $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-F Stopping on sidewalk $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-G Stopping alongside/opposite any
street excavation $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500-H Stopping, parking on edge of
roadway $25 00 $50 00 $80 00 '
22500-I Stopping in bus zone $255 00 $375 00 $450 00 4
22500-K Stopping on a bridge $25 50 $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22500 1 Parking/stopping in a fire lane $58.50 $85 00 $105 00
22502-A Curb parking $25 00 $50.00 $80 00
22505-B Parking in posted no parking zone $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22507 8A Parking in handicap zone $255 00 $375 00 $450 00
22507 8B Preventing access to handicapped
parking $255 00 $375 00 $450 00
t
Del P A on
Code* Descnption of Citation Bail Bail Hold Amt
22514 Parking adjacent to fire hydrant $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22515 Leaving vehicle on street without
motor off, brakes set $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22516 Locked vehicle left standing with
person inside $40 00 $70 00 $95 00
22521 Parking/stopping on railroad $25 00 $50 00 $80 00
22522 Parking, sidewalk access ramps $255 00 $375 00 $450 00
22651-K Vehicle parked in excess of 72
hours $58 50 $90 00 $125 00
23115 Vehicle with uncovered load $83 00 $140 00 $200 00
* Code referenced is either the California Vehicle Code or the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code
CHAPTER 4 76
BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES
Sections
4 76 010 Building and safety fee deposits
4 76 020 Building permits
4 76 030 Electrical permits
4 76 040 Pluming permits
4 76 050 Mechanical permits
4 76 060 Grading permits
4 76 070 Miscellaneous permits and inspections
4 76 080 Residential building permits
4 76 090 Swimming pool permits
4 76 100 Residential aluminum patio cover permits
4 76 110 Fee refunds
4 76 120 Exemptions
4 76 130 Solar energy permits
4 76 140 Fines.
4 76 010 Building and safety fee deposits All projects submitted for building and safety
review shall be classified as either a minor or major project. A minor project shall be generally
considered as a project with building and safety fee totalling less than one hundred dollars A
major project shall be generally considered as a project with building and safety fees totalling
greater than one hundred dollars. A building and safety fee deposit as listed below shall be '
collected at the time of submittal for building department review This deposit is nonrefundable
and shall be credited to the amount of the final permit fee The final permit fee shall be
calculated by the building and safety department and paid at the time the permit is issued
A Minor project, twenty-five dollars per plan requiring review,
B Major project, one hundred dollars per plan requiring review
4 76 020 Building permits Any person filing an application for a permit to do
construction work shall pay a fee according to the following schedule
A $1,000 or less, $26.00
B $1,001 to $2,000 $26.00
Plus $2.40 or each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof over
$1,001
C $2,001 to $25,000, $53 00
Plus $8 00 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof over $2,001
D $25,001 to $50,000, $252 00
Plus $6 50 or each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000
E $50,001 to $100,000, $414 50
Plus $4 50 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to
and including $100,000
F $100,001 to $500,000, $639 50
Plus $3 50 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to
and including $500,000
G $500,001 to $1,000,000, $2,039 50
Plus $3 00 or each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to
and including $1,000,000
H $1,000,001 and up, $3,539 50
Plus $2 00 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof
I. Plan review, ninety percent of the building permit fee, if plans are incomplete or
revised so as to require additional review, an additional fee will be charged at a rate of thirty-
five dollars per hour with a minimum charge of twenty-five dollars As required by section 303
of the Uniform Building Code
4 76 030 Electrical permits A Any person filing an application for a permit to do
electrical work shall pay a fee according to the following schedule
1 Each service switch six hundred volts or less and not over two hundred
amperes, eighteen dollars
2 Each service switch six hundred volts or less and over two hundred
amperes to one thousand amperes, thirty-seven dollars,
3 Each service switch over six hundred volts or over one thousand amperes,
seventy-four dollars
B The following permit fees are based on the actual area of the occupancies listed,
determined from the exterior dimensions and include all lighting fixtures, switches, receptacles
and the circuit wiring thereof and are in addition to the fee for the electrical service. An
additional fee shall apply to each motor, transformer or other electrical appliance that exceeds
fifty units in accordance with the alternate fee schedule.
1 Warehouse, storage garages and aircraft hangers where no repair work is
done, $0 010 per sq ft
2 All occupancies not listed, up to and including five thousand square feet,
$0 055 per sq ft
3 All occupancies not listed, that part which is over five thousand square
feet, $ 01 per square foot,
4 Plan Review Fees Where no plan review fee is charged as listed m
subdivisions 1 through 3 of this sub-section, and an electrical plan is
required to be submitted, a plan review fee of one-half the electrical
permit fee shall be paid
5 Alternate Fee Schedule Alterations, additions and new construction -
where no structural work is being done or where it is impractical to use i
the square footage schedule, convert to units as follows
a For each motor or appliance, each horsepower, one unit,
b For each transformer or appliance, each kilowatt or kilowatt-
ampere, one unit,
c For each three outlets, each three lighting fixtures or fraction
thereof, where current is used or controlled, one unit
d For multi-outlet assembly (festoon type, plug mold, etc ), each
twenty feet, one unit,
e Unit application is as follows
0 00--1 $5 00
1 01--10 $10 00
10 01--50 $15 00
50 01--100 $29 00
101 and over $44 00
6 Temporary Service Temporary service fees are as follows
a Temporary or construction service, including poles or pedestals,
thirteen dollars each,
b Approval for temporary use of permanent service equipment prior
to completion of structure or final inspection, eight dollars each,
c Additional secondary or supporting poles, four dollars each,
7 Miscellaneous. Miscellaneous fees are as follows
a. Area lighting standards, $7 50
b Private residential swimming pools,
including supply wiring, lights, motors
and bonding, $25 00
c Commercial swimming pools, $30 00
d Temporary sales stand, including service
connection, etc $20 00
e. Inspection for reinstallation of idle meter (removed
by utility company), $11 00
f Overhead line construction, poles and anchors each, $50 00
g Any electrical work for which a permit is required,
but no fee is provided in this chapter, shall pay
the indicated fee, $20 00
8 Illuminated Signs Illuminated sign fees are as follows
a New, Relocated or Altered Illuminated signs
0 00--5 square feet $9 00
5 01--25 square feet $11 00
25 01--50 square feet $13 00
50 01--100 square feet $18 00
100 01--200 square feet $21 00
200 01--300 square feet $24 00
300 01--square feet and over (per square foot) $0 07
4 76 040 Plumbing permits A Any person filing an application for a permit to do
plumbing work shall pay a fee according to the following schedule
1 For each plumbing fixture or trap (including water,
drainage piping and backflow protection therefor) $6 00
2 For each building sewer connection $13 00
3 For each private sewer line with over five building
connections $33 00
4 Over ten building sewer connections, each $3 00
5 For each pnvate sewage lift station or sump pump,
rated up to 1 hp $7 00
6 Over 1 hp, add per rated horsepower $1 00
7 For each cesspool $22 00
8 For each septic tank $20 00
9 For each complete private sewage disposal
system $44 00
10 For each water heater and/or vent $7 50
11 For each gas piping system, 1 to 5 outlets $7 00
12 For 6 or more outlets per outlet $7.03 pis
$1 CO per
outlet
13 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor,
including its trap and vent, except kitchen-type
grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $11 00
14 For installation, alteration or repair of water piping
and/or water treating equipment, each $6 00
15 For each water distribution system on private property,
with over 5 connections $33 00
16 Over 10 connections plus $3 00 each $33 00
17 For each swimming pool, including all necessary piping
Public $46 00
Private $44 00
18 For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $7 00
19 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter,
including backflow protection devices therefor $8 00
20 For vacuum breakers or backflow protection devices
on tanks, vats, etc , or for installation on unprotected
plumbing fixtures, including necessary water piping
1--5 $7 00
Over 5, each $1 00
B Plan Review Fees Where no plan review fee is charged as listed in subsection
A of this section and a plumbing plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee of one-half '
the plumbing permit fee shall be paid
4 76 050 Mechanical permits A Any person filing an application for a permit to do
mechanical construction shall pay a fee, according to the following schedule
1 For the installation or relocation of each forced-air
or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and
vents attached to such appliances up to and including
100,000 BTUs $8 50
2 For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or
gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents
attached to such appliance over 100,000 BTUs $10 00
3 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace,
including vent $8 50
4 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater,
recessed wall heater, or floor-mounted unit heater $9 60
5 For the installation or relocation or replacement of each
appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance
permit $4 50
6 For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each
heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption
unit or each heating, cooling system, including installation of controls
regulated by the Uniform Mechanical Code $8.50
7 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor, to and including 3 hp or each absorption
system to and including 100,000 BTUs $8 50
8 Over 3 hp, to and including 15 hp, or each absorption system
over 100,000 BTUs to and including 500,000 BTUs $16 00
9 Over 15 hp, to and including 30 hp, or each absorption
system over 500,000 BTUs to and including 1,000,000 BTUs $22 50
10 Over 30 hp, to and including 50 hp, or each absorption
system over 1,000,000 BTUs to and including 1,750,000
BTUs $33 00
11 Over 50 hp, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 BTUs $55 50
12 For each air handling unit To and including 10,000 cubic
feet per minute including ducts attached thereto $6 50
Over 10,000 cubic feet per minute $10 00
Note This fee shall not apply to an air handling unit which
is a portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit
evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit fee
is prescribed elsewhere in this section
13 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $6 50
14 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $4 00
15 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any
heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permit $6 50
16 For the installation of each hood other than a Type 1 grease
hood, served by mechanical exhaust , including the ducts from
such hood $7 00
17 For each Type 1 grease hood, including the exhaust system $20 00
18 For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type
incinerator $10 00
19 For the installation or relocation of each commercial or
industrial-type incinerator $44 00
20 For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the
Uniform Mechanical Code but not classed in other appliance
categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this
section $7 00
B Plan Review Fees Where no plan review fee is charged as listed in subsection
A of this section, and a mechanical plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee of one-
half the mechanical permit fee shall be paid
4 76 060 Grading permits A Any person filing an application for a permit to do
grading work shall pay a fee according to the following schedule The fee for a grading permit
authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between fee paid
for the ongmal permit and the fee shown for the entire project
0-100 - cubic yards $20 00
101-1,000 cubic yards $20.00
Plus $12 50 for each additional 100
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
100 cubic yards
1,001-10,000 cubic yards $129 00
Plus $12.00 or each additional 1,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
1,001 cubic yards
10,001--100,000 cubic yards $238.00
Plus $40 00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
10,001 cubic yards
100,001 cubic yards and over $594 00
Plus $20 00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
100,001 cubic yards
B Plan Review Fee For excavation and fill on the same site, the fee shall be based
on the volume of the excavation or fill, whichever is greater Separate permits and fees shall
apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as indicated elsewhere in this chapter 1
There shall be no separate charge for standard terrace drains and similar facilities The amount
of the plan review fee for grading plans shall be forth in the following schedule
0--100 cubic yards $13 00
101--1,000 cubic yards $26 00
1,001--100,000 cubic yards $26 00
Plus $17 00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
10,001 cubic yards
100,001--200,000 cubic yards $175 00
Plus $12 00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
100,001 cubic yards
200,001 cubic yards and over $296 00
Plus $6 00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof over
200,001 cubic yards
4 76 070 Miscellaneous permits and inspections A. Permit Issuance Fees
1 In addition to the fee prescribed in the electrical, mechanical,
plumbing and solar energy schedules, for each such permit on a
single application form $13 00
2 Minimum total fee for any permit $33 00
3 Field investigation and report $75 00
4 Short-term installations
a. Temporary, construction, material processing $110 00
b Approved temporary tents $66 00
5 Special inspection approvals $26 00
6 Standard plans
a. Fee to establish standard plan $40 00
b Comparison plan review fee $13 00
c Annual review $40 00
6 Service charge for cash deposits and other sureties $33 00
B. Relocation Inspection Fee The relocation inspection fees when a building is to
be moved are as follows
1 On the same property $66 00
2. Front one property to another within the city $132 00
3 From outside the city $198 00
C Set-down Permit Fees
1 Group R-3 occupancies up to 2,000 square feet area
including all fees $198 00
2 Group R-3 occupancies 2,001 square feet and over in
area including all fees $330 00
3 Group M-1 occupancies, including all fees $66 00
4 All other occupancies, fee is based on the valuation of the work per
chapter 15 28 plus all required electrical, mechanical, plumbing and solar
energy fees.
D Annual Permits Annual permits per Section 15 04 050 of this code are as
follows
1--10 employees $132 00
11--75 employees $264 00
76--150 employees $396 00
151--300 employees $666 00
E Rehabilitation and Demolition Processing Fees
1 Preparation of job specifications $198 00
2 City Council approval $61 00
3 Contract performance inspection $61 00
F Billing fee $33 00
G Record special assignment $99 00
H Wire and/or wood fences (per lot) $20 00
I. Residential dnveway approach $33 00
4 76 080 Building permit fees
A $1 00 to $500 00 $15 00
B. $501 00 to $2,000 00 $15 00 for the first $500 00
Plus $2 00 for each additional $100 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 00
C $2,001 00 to $25,000 00 $45 00 for the first $2,000 00
Plus $9 00 for each additional $1,000 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00
D $25,001 00 to $50,000 00 $252 00 for the first $25,000 00
Plus $6 50 for each additional $1,000 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 00
E $50,001 00 to $100,000 00 $415 50 for the first $50,000 00
Plus $4 50 for each.additional$1,000 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including$100,000 00
F _ $100,001 00 to $500,000 00 $639 50 for the first $100,000 00
Plus $3 50 for each additional $1,000 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 00
G. $500,001 00 to 1,000,000 00 $2,039 50 for the first
$500,000 00
Plus $3 00 for each additional $1,000 00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 00
H $1,000,001 00 and up $3,359 50 for the first$1,000,000 00
Plus $2 00 for each additional $1,000 00 or
fraction thereof
4 76 090 Swimming pool permits The building permit fee for new swimming pools is
as prescribed in this section The permit fee includes plan review fees as shown below and all
inspection fees for all phases of the construction including permit issuance fees, electrical permit
fees, mechamcal permit fees, plumbing permit fee and solar energy permit fees
A Swimming pools accessory to a single-family dwelling +
1 With a standard plan $191 00
2 With other than a standard plan $218 00
B All other swimming pools
1 With a standard plan $191 00
2 With other than a standard plan $218 00
C Spas and/or hot tubs
1 With gas hookup $66 00
2 Self contained $33 00
4 76 100 Residential aluminum patio cover permits Residential aluminum patio cover
permit fees are as follows.
A Residential aluminum patio covers, includes plan review and permit issuance fees,
forty dollars,
B When the patio cover is to be constructed from a San Bernardino County standard
plan or an International Conference of Building Officials standard plan, the set fee will include
comparison plan review and permit issuance fees, thirty-three dollars
4 76 110 Fee refunds The building department may authorize the refunding of any fee
paid under the following conditions
A A fee that was erroneously paid or collected,
B A refund shall not be more than eighty percent of the permit fee paid when no
work has been done under a permit A refund shall not be more than eighty percent of the plan
review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is
withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done,
C A refund of not more than eighty percent of any planning fee when the request
for the planning action is withdrawn or canceled before any work by the department is done,
D In no case shall the building official retain more than fifty-five dollars of the fees
paid, as described in this section nor shall he refund any amount of the fees less than fourteen
dollars;
E The building official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid except upon
written application filed by the original permittee not later than one hundred eighty days after
the date of fee payments.
4 76 120 Exemptions There shall be an exemption from all permit, plan review and
inspection fees as set forth in this chapter when all of the following conditions exist
A The building permit is for rebuilding or rehabilitating a structure because of
damage caused by and occumng in the course of disaster,
B The city council has adopted a resolution declanng a state of emergency due to
the disaster, for damage caused by or occumng in the same disaster and the application for the
building permit is filed with the department of building and safety within one hundred eighty
days after the resolution has been adopted by the city council
- 4 76 130 Solar energy permits Any person filing an application for a permit to do solar
energy work shall pay a fee according to the following schedule
A Collectors, including related piping and regulating services
0-1,000 square feet $4 00
1,001--2,000 square feet $7 00
2,001--square feet and over $7 00
Plus $2 00 for each additional 1,000 square feet or fraction
thereof over 2,001 square feet
B Storage tanks, including related piping and regulating devices
0-750 gallons $3 00
751--2,000 gallons $4 00
2,000 gallons and over $4 00
Plus $2 00 for each additional 1,000 cubic feet
C For rock storage
0--1,500 cubic feet $3 00
1,501-3,000 cubic feet $4 00
3,001 cubic feet and over $4 Q0
Plus $2 00 for each additional 1,000 cubic feet or fraction
thereof over 3,001 cubic feet.
D For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Uniform Solar Energy
Code for which no fee is hsted, three dollars.
E Plan Review Fee. Where no plan review fee is charged and a plan is required
to be submitted for the solar energy system, and a plan review fee is required to be submitted
for the solar energy system, a plan review fee of one-half the solar energy permit shall be paid
Note The fees in this section do not include permit fees for any parts of the solar
system which are subject to the requirements of other applicable codes
4 76 140 Fines Fines per infraction of this chapter are as follows
A Building without a permit (other than a fence or wall), one thousand one hundred
seventy-five dollars,
B Erecting a fence or wall without a permit, three hundred seventy-five dollars
Chapter 4 88
PLANNING FEES
Sections
4 88 010 Planning fees
4 88 010 Planning fees Planning fees are as follows
A Site and Architectural Review
1 Administrative site and architectural review $200 00
2 Standard Site and Architectural Review
a If total area of proposed improvement or site is less
than 500 square feet $260 00
b If total area of proposed improvement or site is 500
to 1,499 square feet $640 Q0
c If total area of proposed improvement or site is 1,500
to 2,999 square feet $1,020 00
d If total area of proposed improvement or site is
greater than 3,000 square feet $1,400 00
B Conditional Use Permit.
1 Administrative conditional use permit $200 00
2. Standard conditional use permit:
a. If total area of proposed improvement or site is less
than 500 square feet $260 00
b If total area of proposed improvement or site is 500 to
1,499 square feet $650 00
c If total area of proposed improvement or site is 1,500
to 2,999 square feet $1,430 00
d. If total area of proposed improvement or site is
greater than 3,000 square feet $2,000 00
C Variance
1 Sign variance $300 00
2. Minor deviation $300 00
3 Standard variances $1,450 00
4 General plan amendment $1,900 00
5 Zone change $1,300 00
6 Specific plans
a. Initial specific plan $3,000I3 Rs
staff time
b Specific plan amendment $1,350.00
7 Determination of use $225 00
8 Environmental assessment/negat ve declaration $400 00
Plus $30 00 Fish and Game filing fee
9 Environmental impact report, five hundred dollars, plus cost of consultant;
two thousand dollar deposit required, plus additional costs
10 Tentative Map May also require engineering fee
a Preliminary review $300 00
b Minor subdivision (parcel map) $250 00
Plus $35 00 per lot
c Major Subdivision $900 00
Plus $35 00 per lot
d Revised tentative map (minor or major) $350 00
11 Final Map May also require engineenng fee
a Minor subdivision (parcel map) $250 00
b Major subdivision $350 00 '
Plus $25 00 per lot
12 Lot line adjustment, includes required certificate of compliance, may also
require engineering fee, seven hundred fifty dollars,
13 Lot merger, may also require engineering fee, five hundred dollars,
14 Reversion to acreage, may also require engineering fee, five hundred
dollars,
15 Certificate of compliance, nine hundred dollars,
16 Extensions, two hundred dollars,
17 Sign Permit. May also require engineering and building and safety fees
a. Standard Sign
i If total area of sign is thirty-two square feet or less, fifty
dollars,
u. if total area of sign is greater than thirty-two square feet,
two hundred dollars,
b Overall sign program, three hundred seventy dollars;
b Standard sign per approved sign program, ten dollars,
c Temporary sign, ten dollars, fifty dollar deposit required.
18 Landuse/Plancheck of Working Plans Swimming pools, spas,
patios, decks, accessory structures, walls, fences, and other
structures and/or improvements which do not require site and
architectural review, 25% of building permit, $33 00 minimum
19 Revisions, other than maps or minor design alterations, two hundred
dollars, _
20 Appeal of Planing Director's decision, four hundred ninety dollars,
20 Fines per infraction.
a. Zoning title violation (other than illegal sign), three hundred
seventy-five dollars;
b Illegal sign, two hundred thirty-five dollars '
D Code Enforcement Fees to Cover Overhead Costs.
1. Hazardous structure abatement.
a. First notice and posting $50 00
b Non-compliance - second notice $50 00
c Filing and processing for demolition $500 00
2. Debris abatement
a.. Non-compliance - second notice of violation $50 00
b Follow-up inspections $25 00
3 Sign abatement
a Non-compliance - second notice of violation $25 00
b Follow-up inspections $25 00
c Removal of off-site garage sale signs $15 00
d Removal of all other signs $100 00
4 Sub-standard structures
a Non-compliance - second notice of violation $50 00
b Follow-up inspections $25 00
c Issuance of citation processing $50 00
5 Miscellaneous violations
a Non-compliance - second notice of violation $50 00
b follow - up inspections $25 00
Chapter 4 96
FACILITY USE FEES
Sections
4 96 010 Fee and deposits--Civic center
4 96 010 Fees and deposits--Civic center A A minimum rental of two hours is
required on all facilities Any exceptions must be approved in writing by the community
services director
B The city may require licensed security officers for additional supervision on any
reservation These officers will be hired by the city and all related fees to be paid in addition
to the other charges for the use of the facility by the permittee For each one to one hundred
guests, one security guard required
C Group must appear within fifteen minutes of beginning time specified or permit
will be canceled and all fees forfeited
ID In order to reserve a facility, all deposits must be paid at the time of application
All fees must be paid prior to five working days before the scheduled event/reservation Special
arrangements for payment of fees must be approved by the finance director and must be paid
by cash or cashiers check
E Deposits are refundable only if facilities are left in a clean and orderly manner
and no damage has occurred A minimum fee of seventy-five dollars will be charged and
deducted from deposit, if any part of the facility needs to be cleaned by staff Charges for
damages or stolen equipment will be based on costs of materials, staff time and a twenty-five
percent administrative fee
F If a group goes beyond any scheduled ending time, an overtime penalty fee will
be charged at twice the hourly rate and deducted from the deposit
G If any additional fees are in excess of deposit then permittee will be held liable
for additional costs and be billed for the amount exceeding the deposit
H Fee Schedule Fees are per hour
1 Meeting Room (community room subdivided)
a Resident $20 00
b Nonresident $25 00
2 Community Room
a Resident $30 00
b Nonresident $40 00
3 Council Chambers (resident) $55 00
4 Kitchen
a Resident $20 00
b Nonresident $25 00
5 Nonprofit groups (during normal business hours) No charge
6 Deposits for all rooms $150 00
I Use of ball field lights (per token) $10 00
`N�r�wrw�rw .
C 1 T
<• -141hh Planning
'GRAND TERR j'i Department
VEMwEw
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: August 12, 1993
SUBJECT: TTM-88-02-R1, V-93-01, E-93-04
An application for a Vanance, Environmental Review, and
Tentative Map Revision, Tract Map 14078 for a 15 lot
subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone
APPLICANT: Barney Karger
LOCATION: Pico Street, Blue Mountain Court
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
***************************************
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission on July 15, 1993 approved the subject map based upon conditions
of approval Refer to attached Planning Commission staff report and resolution,
Attachment A The map is a revised map which had earlier been approved by the City
Council on September 8, 1988
Three main issues were reviewed in the tentative map revision as proposed overall revision
of map layout due to DWR easement, proper erosion control from the project site and
additional Fire mitigation measures to compensate for non-compliance of Fire requirement
of 600 ft roadway in onginal map
One of the conditions of approval for the project was to obtain the necessary permits from
the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR), for development near or
across their easement which runs across the project site Maps extensions were not
recommended for approval by the City Engineer unless the tentative tract map was revised
The Department of Water Resources is no longer taking the responsibility of improving the
road in case utilities need service They will just dig and fix their utilities However,
22795 Barton Road• Grand Terrace California 92324-CO8NL NDA ITEM#lo(J
repaving of the road is up to the property owner Neither the City nor the applicant can
assume this liability Therefore, the applicant has prepared this revised map to avoid any '
complications from development on or near the DWR easement by relocating the main
access road from the DWR easement The other issue involved proper erosion control from
the site as the City has received numerous complaints in the past of mud and dirt running
down Pico Avenue dunng the ramy season Therefore, the Planning Commission and City
Staff recommends implementation of approved Erosion Control Plan by September 30, 1993, '
prior to rainy season. Lastly, the ongmal map did not meet the 600 foot road requirement
for Fire standards thus, a portion of FR1 (Fire Regulation Conditions)were required by the
Fire Warden's Department due to the close proximity of the proposed project to Blue
Mountain and higher fire hazard areas The City Staff is researching and preparing to bang
to the City Council a Fire Overlay Zone and requirements for that area in the near future
per recommendation of the Fire Department As such, the Fire Warden's Department for
this particular project is attempting to mitigate the illegal situation of less than 600 feet
between intersections and provided mitigated measures to give the applicant some flexibility
It should be noted that this map as revised incorporates the reservoir lot, thus elmimatmg
the need for a separate map for that purpose Only one final map is permitted.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Planning Department recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving TTM-88-02R1, V-93-01, E-93-04 subject to the conditions of approval contained
therein (See Attachment A)
Respectfully Submitted,
(?AjikultAf-VIY;
Patnzia Materassi,
Community Development Director
PM MCM ma
c\wp51\planning\maps\ttm8802r cc
}N}
•
CITY
- rs _` Planning
GRAN DepartmentD TERR•C_;
t�
~•VEM�ER��• '..
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: June 17, 1993 (Continued to July 15, 1993)
SUBJECT: TTM-88-02R1, V-93-01, E-93-04 (REVISED REPORT)
An application for a Variance, Environmental Review and Tentative
Map Revision 14078 for a 15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot m
the R1-20 Zone.
APPLICANT: Barney Karger
LOCATION: Pico Street, Blue Mountain Court
(APN# 277-181-01)
RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on Conditions of Approval
*********************************************
PLEASE NOTE ITEMS IN ITALICS ARE CHANGES REFLECTING SECOND REVISED
MAP SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT AFTER THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - -
The tentative tract map will require the issuance of a Negative Declaration, refer to
Attachment B
ZONING AND LANDUSE
The subject property is in the R1-20 Zone District minimum lot size per Grand Terrace
Municipal Code is 20 000 The properties to the South and East are in the same zone and
are currently vacant The properties to the North and West are R1-7 2 Zone occupied by
single family residential units The landuse in this area is Low Density Residential
ATTACHMENT A
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 • (909) 824-6621
1 1
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located near the easterly terminus of Pico Street near its intersection
with Blue Mountain Road The site contains approximately 9 2 acres and is vacant land
The applicant had submitted a tentative parcel map which divided the property mto two
legal parcels and a tentative tract map which subdivided the property into 19 homesites and
one water reservoir (Tentative Tract Map 14078/Barney Karger and Tentative Parcel Map
11821/Riverside Highland Water). Both were approved with conditions of approval on
September 8, 1988 by City Council
One of the conditions of approval for the project was to obtain the necessary permits from
the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR), for development near or
across their easement which runs across the project site Maps extensions were not
recommended for approval by the City Engineer unless the tentative tract map was revised
The Department of Water Resources is no longer taking the responsibility of improving the
road in case utilities need service They will just dig and fix their utilities However,
repaving of the road is up to the property owner Neither the City nor the applicant can
assume this liability Therefore, the applicant has prepared this revised map to avoid any
complications from development on or near the DWR easement by relocating the main
access road from the DWR easement. By doing so, the tentative tract map will be altered
on the following items such as lot square footage, street alignment, pad level alterations to
block wall suuroundzng the Riverside Highland Water Reservoir pad-level,relocation of a 24"
transmission water main, lot width, depth, sidewalk, drainage etc.
DISCUSSION
During the preliminary meeting and followup contacts, several
issues were discussed between the applicant, his engineer, City Staff and Fire Warden's
Representative The following issues needed to be addressed
1 Vacant site causes improper drainage and runoff control
2 Inadequate Circulation Plan between site and adjacent properties Lack of
proper street alignment with surrounding si.,,3ivisions
3 The project site lies near a high fire hazard zone, Blue Mountain area,
according to the Fire Warden's Department
4 Lot sizes, lot width, and lot depth and street frontage are not in conformance
with the GTMC
5 Interior road does not contain sidewalks on both side
6 Drainage easement west of west curbline of Court "A" is not acceptable
7 Option to file separate final maps to be determined by applicant
These items are addressed in the ISSUE SEC:I ION below
ISSUES
1 Vacant site causes improper drainage and runoff control.
There is presently no development or on-site improvements on the site The site
generates a soil and drainage runoff that floods at the southwest corner of the
property, joining with the run off from Blue Mountain and contmumg down Pico
Avenue. In the past few years, the City has received complaints regarding the
accumulation of mud and water runoff from this site. As a result this project is
conditioned by the City Engmeer to have the applicant submit an Erosion Control
Plan for review by the Planning Commission The same shall be implemented by
September 1993 prior to the next rainy season. This is a mitigation measure of the
Negative Declaration and will be monitored by the City Engineer and Riverside
Corona Resource Conservation District
Since this report was distributed, the Erosion Control Plan has been submitted to the
City Engineer and approved by him.
The City Engineer is satisfied that he can resolve any drainage issues such as drainage
from the east, drainage across the rear yards of lots, drainage across Lot A and drainage
from A Court by requirements during the process of this map He is available to answer
any questions
2 Inadequate Circulation Plan between site and adjacent properties. Lack of proper
street alignment with surrounding subdivisions.
The previous submitted map did not adequately indicate a proper Circulation
connection and street alignment to the adjacent properties and subdivisions As a
result the applicant revised the map and added a detailed circulation plan for the
review by the Planning Commission On the onginal approved map 14078,TTM-88-
02 the circulation tie-in to adjacent subdivisions were not clearly indicated The
Circulation Plan before the Planning Commission indicates possible alternatives as
agreed upon by City Staff and Fire Warden's Department.
a) Possible future connection with the property owner to the east,
Dennis Kidd's parcel,with installation of standard cul-de-sac, or
b) Fire approved angled hammerhead in the City nght of way at the end
of Pico Avenue
The applicant has since indicated to staff that the connection into the Dennis Kidd
parcel is no longer a viable option as the owner is not interested in selling, a portion
or nis land at this time and cannot reacn an agreement with the applicant
Therefore, the angled hammerhead which is basically two driveways will be within
the City right of way and should not exceed approximately more than 5' feet on
either side of the right of way The applicant is in the process of designing the
hammerhead in accordance with the specifications of the Fire Warden's Department
and City Engineer's Department
The Circulation Plan before the Planning Commission gives a clearer circulation and
street alignment tie-in with the proposed development and surrounding parcels.
3. The project site lies near a high fire hazard zone,Blue Mountain area,according to
the Fire Warden's Department.
The Fire Warden's Department Representative expressed fire concerns with the high
fire hazard area near Blue Mountain. The Fire Warden's recommendation in the ,
memorandum to the City dated April 22, 1993 and amended sheet includes fire
prevention requirements FR1 classification which can include sprinkling of buildings
as one mitigation measure. The applicant is working with the Fire Warden's
Department to design the project suitable for a fire hazard zone. The Fire
Department will provide some flexibility since the City has not yet adopted FR1 or
2 for this area.
4. Lot sizes, lot width, and lot depth are not in conformance with the GTMC.
In order to revise the map per recommendation of the City Engineer, the applicant
had to reduce and realign the lots to avoid any conflicts in development on or near
the easement areas, particularly the State of California Aqueduct (Department of
Water Resources). Therefore, the apphcant is requesting variances for lot sizes, lot
width, and lot depth.
The Grand Terrace Municipal Code require a minimum 20,000 square foot lot size
There are lot sizes in the revised tentative map that do not meet the City Code
However, as indicated in the revised map, the lot sizes range from 2,930 12,970
square feet to 35,660 square feet The average lot size is 28;136 22,000 square feet
The Planning Department requests your attention on a Variance allowance for the
lot sizes for lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 2 through 5 and :ow 11 through 15
Additionally, the lot width required for this zone district is 100 feet and the lot depth
is 150 feet The applicant is requesting a variance for a few lots that do not meet the
width or depth requirements, lots 2, 3, 5, 11, 13 and 14
Due to the hardship the applicant faces by meeting the requirements of DWR
easement, staff recommends approval since we can make variance State findings or
requirements
Refer to Attachment H, Variance Table
5. Interior road does not contain sidewalks on both sides as indicated in the General
Plan.
The circulation plan of the General Plan indicates the development dimensions of
all streets in the City. The interior road, Court "A", does not meet the specifics of
the General Plan. However, it has been City policy as adoption of the San
Bernardino County Road Department Standard that sidewalks do not have to be on
both sides of the streets in the case of small interior roadways and as recommended
in the City Engineer's memorandum, the alternative is listed. The City Engineer is
here this evening to address this item.
a
6. Drainage easement west of west curbline of Court "A" is not acceptable.
The City Engineer and the applicant's engineer have resolved this by including this
section as a letter lot and mcorporating into the Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment Distract The City Engineer will be available this evening to answer any
questions
7. Option to file separate final maps to be determined by applicant.
Per the Subdivision Map Act, a simpler procedure to final portions of a tentative
tract map separately is available. Instead of submitting a parcel map and a tentative
map for the same project, the applicant may submit a phasing plan along with a
Statement of Intent to file separate final maps for each phase.
4\
Staff has made a determination that previously submitted parcel map 14078 and
11821 will be nulled with the approval of subject map TTM-88-02R1 which will
supersede all previous applications. It is the option of the applicant to submit
phasing plan and letter of intent prior to the City Council Meeting in case he desire
the option to final the reservoir map separately Response will be available at the
Planning Commission Meeting
8 Map does not reflect block wall around reservoir on Lot A
Staff has conferred with applicant and Riverside Highland Water that the block wall
around the reservoir should be reflected on Lot A, as agreed to by them in their project
agreement, noted in condition. It was overlooked in the revising of this map but agreed
to be done by the applicant prior to the City Council review of the map
REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS
All reviewing agency comments have been taken into consideration_ refer to Attachments
C througn G To date staff had not received comments tram the Riverside Corona
Resource Conservation Distnct regarding the Erosion Control Plan, but has conditioned the
project for the applicant to comply with their recommendations if any Please not that all
other previous map conditions have been incorporated into this set of new approval
conditions
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of revised
Tentative Tract Map 14078, TTM-88-02R1, by adoption of resolution (Attachment A) and
associated Negative Declaration subject to conditions of approval mcluded therein.
Respectfully Submitted,
"rzet2z,etjg.
iyzi_i__th&
Maria C. Muett,
Associate Planner
Approved by,
Patrizia Materassi,
Planning Director -
PM:MCM ma
Attachments A - Resolution
B - Negative Declaration
C - City Engineer's Comments
D - Fire Warden's Comments
E - DWR Comments
F - Riverside Highland Water Comments
G - Department of Agriculture Comment`,
H - Variance Table
Exhibits A - Revised Map (2nd Revision)
B - Circulation Plan (remains the same - please bring to
meeting)
C - Erosion Control Plan (Revision)
D - Original map and conditions of approval (to be
distributed prior to the meeting)
c\wp51\planning\maps\ttm8802r pc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TTM-88-02R1 (TENTATIVE MAP 14078), E-93-04,
V-93-01 AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, the applicant, Barney Karger, has applied for approval of a revised
tentative tract map, dividing 9 2 acres into 15 homesites and one water reservoir site; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on June 17, 1993, and
WHEREAS, this project was continued to the July 1, 1993 Planning Commission
Meeting, which was canceled, and
WHEREAS, this project was continued again to the July 15, 1993 Planning
Commission Meeting and was reviewed, and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article
6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment B) and said Negative
Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the
Cahforma Environmental Quality Act
WHEREAS, at this July 15, 1993 hearing, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of TTM-88-02R1 and the Negative Declaration to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by City Council on August
12, 1993 regarding approval of TTM-88-02R1 and the Negative Declaration
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby '
resolve as follows
Section 1 Environmental Review - An environmental review of TTM-88-02R1 has
been conducted and noticed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, that
based upon review, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace finds that the proposed
subdivision will not have a significant effect upon the environment
Section 2 Findings - This City Council does hereby make the following findings
relative to the approval of TTM-88-02R1
1 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development
2 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development
3 That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat
4 That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not
likely to cause senous public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a
wildland conflagration
5 That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements are consistent with the General Plan
6 That the proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and
improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the regulations of the Development
Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Negat'l.z.Declaration is hereby adopted and
that TTM-88-02R1 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions
1 An Erosion Control Plan was submitted and approved by the City Engineer
prior to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 15, 1993 It shall be
installed by September 30, 1993, pnor to this year's rainy season Otherwise,
the approval of this map is null and void
2 The applicant shall construct a six foot high solid decorative block wall around
the perimeter Additionally, around the wall, there shall be high trees and
densely landscaped materials to properly shield reservoir site from public view
as much as possible These materials to be approved by the Planning
Director prior to final inspection of block wall Landscaping to be maintained
by property owners of Lots 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 respectively The applicant
shall be allowed to construct a chain link fence on the east side of the
reservoir site only, Lot A, instead of a block wall, until the development to
the east takes place At that time, the six foot high solid decorative block wall
shall be completed on the east side of the reservoir site, Lot A.
3 The reservoir tank shall not extend higher than six feet above the required six
foot high block wall At the time of entire structure repainting by property
owner of Lot A, a color sample shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for their review and approval The intent is to avoid a negative
visual impact or obtrusiveness to surrounding property owners
4 A Landscaping and Lighting Distnct shall be established for the purpose of
providing adequate lighting and maintenance of public areas including median
with palm tree areas and Lot "B" west of "A" Court
5 An overall design program shall be approved by the Planning Director Such
program shall include, but not be limited to.
* Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of custom
homes,
* Location of buildable pads for each individual lot, and
* Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements
6 Appropriate CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Community
Development Director and City Attorney said CC&Rs shall include the
approved design program required in Condition No 5, wall and slope
maintenance as noted in Condition #2 and 16, DWR and SCE easements to
be clearly defined on respective lots 4,5,6,7,9 and 10 CCR's shall be recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder
7 All the conditions as recommended by the Department of
Engineering/Building and Safety in their memorandum dated June 4, 1993,
attached as Attachment C
8 All the conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden's
Department in their memorandum dated April 15, 1993 and amended My 11,
1993, attached as Attachment D
9 All the conditions as recommended by the State of California Department of
Water Resources in their memorandum dated June 12, 1993, attached as
Attachment E
10 All the conditions as recommended by the Riverside Highland Water
Company in their letter dated May 5, 1993, attached as Attachment F.
11 Recommendation by the State of Cahforma Department of Agriculture in
their letter dated April 16, 1993, attached as Attachment G
12 Compliance with the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District for the
Erosion Control Plan
13 Payment of Traffic Mitigation Fee wherever the fee is installed in proportion
to amount of trips generated by the development
14 In accordance with Subregional TCM Implementation Program, wherever
adopted and installed by the City, the applicant (property owner) shall have
one of the following applicable measures installed, such as on-site pedestrian
walkways and bicycle facilities to connect each building in the development
to public streets (i e Mt Vernon Avenue/Barton Road bicycle lane), or
contribute to a shuttle that accesses transit facilities, or contribute to the
development of a telecommunication center, or contribute to transit
improvements
15 This Tentative Tract Map supersedes any previous map applications for this
property, both parcel and tentative tract maps
16 Block wall surrounding reservoir shall be built within Lot "A" and
maintenance of wall to be the responsibility of owner of Lot "A" All graffiti
removal from block wall in Lot A shall be the responsibility of Lot A property
owner Block wall within Lot "A" shall be reflected on tentative map prior to '
City Council Meeting of August 12, 1993
17 Pull appropriate demolition permits for demolishing and removal of all
imgation structures or facilities
18 Plans shall be amended to clearly distinguish front and rear yard setbacks for
Lots 1,2,3, 9 and 10, clarification of lot accesses and clearly define easement
locations
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a regular meeting held the 12th day of August, 1993
A'1"1 EST
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof
I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 12th day of August, 1993, by the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
John Harper
City Attorney
cITY ':)
rl
Planning
zno TERR c 5` NEGATIVE DECLARATION Department
"AV
V •M.C•.• .,
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
TTM-88-02R1 and E-93-04, An application for a Tentative Tract Map 14078 s.:5division
revision for a 15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone.
APPLICANT:
W.J. Mc Keever Engineering Inc., Dennis Stafford
Barney Karger, Property Owner.
LOCATION:
Northside of Pico Street at Blue Mountain Avnue
APN# 277-181-01
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT.
Based upon the attached Initial Study There is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment
Patrizia Materassi, 2i Date
Planning Director
City of Grand Terrace
Attachment B
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 • (909) 824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
L Background
1_ Name of Proponent City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road. Grand Terrace. CA 92324-5295
Attention: Patrizia Materassi. Planning Director. 714-824-6621
3 Date of Environmental Assessment. 0 /—/`I—93
4. Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace
TENTATIVE i P,.Etc 114 p ' Vo7E / t.)
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Alm
""Ail)
��E� (1 L A P 7-S,A.-to i'e_servolA
yLor
6. Location of Proposal: (Piet) XEET/8LL/i /1ofid- 4IA)gnuI7T
R 2oiiJ
GA'AA!ll Tc��AJ l4
II Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all yes" and 'maybe answers are provided on attached sheets )
Maybe No
1 Earth Will proposal resui- in
Unstable earth conaitions o-
in changes in geologic
substructures? /\
o Disruptions, disolacemems
compaction or ove-c,)\e
or this soil '
-
or around surface retie 3ILre
Yes Maybe No
d The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any substantial increase in wind
or water erosion of soils,either on or off site? X
f Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
situation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
b Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X
2 Air. Will the proposal result in.
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient
air quality X
b The creation of objectionable
odors'
c Alteration of air movement
moisture or temperature or am
chanaP in climate, whether
locally or regionally'
ater Will the proposal result in
Substantial changes in currents
or the course or direction of
wale movements !ri e
-
1
Yes Maybe No
b Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters? /l
d Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X
e Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, mcluding, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
1; Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer
cuts or excavations? X
h Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available for public water
supplies
Exposure of people or property to
water hazards such ac
dooaing or tival waves
Plan. Lire Will the proposal result in
Cnanae in the diversity of species
or numner of any native species o,
ncluaing Trees sllruos
_ anc cu_Iic plants t
i
Yes Maybe No
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing x
species
d Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
mcludmg reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)? X
b Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals? X
c Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat'?
o \oise Will the proposal result in
a Increases in existing noise
ievels? V �__
o Exposure of people to severe
noise levels? X
7 Light and Glare Will the proposal
:-oauce \uostantial nekk lint or glare'
__-� t \A, i :ne or0005a result. -
.�oszantial alteration or to present or
oiannea land use of an area? N __ _
4
Yes Maybe No
9 Natural Resources Will the proposal
result in
a. Substantial increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources? \i(
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource? \1(
10 Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve
a A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? 1�
b Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population
of an area? X
12 Housing Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
:adrlonal housing?
Tr'asportation/Circulation Will the
Droposal result in
Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement'? X
Effects on existing parking
rac,lit1e or demand tee- ne-
aar,ir�
3UDSL..iti?1 impuc, CPU a � JStiii_
transportation system�
Yes Maybe No
d Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail
or air traffic? k
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestnans9
14 Public Services Will the proposal
have substantial effect upon, or result
in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection9
c Schools?
d Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads'
f Other governmental services'? X
_5 Energy Will the proposal result in
• Use of substantial amounts
of fuel or energ} '
b Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the de\e'opment of net'
,Ours.• znerm --
\ti
• need for riev, systems 0_ saDiantlal
alterations to me following utilities
Yes Maybe No
a. Power or natural gas? `j(
b Commurucations systems? X
c. Water? __X_
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X
e Storm water drainage? X__
f Solid waste and disposal? )C
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in-
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)? Y
b. Exposure of people to potential
hazards? X
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view? X
:9 Recreation Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or auantit}
of existing recreatic:,-, opponunities" X.
20 Cultural Resources
a Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of - prehititorn, or ni,<Ori.
�rcriiaeotooic... • e
Yes Maybe No
b Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
or object? /�
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values x
d Will the proposal restrict
- existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area?
21 Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory'
o Does me project nal.e the
potential to achieve short-term
to the aisadvantage of long-term
e- -ronmental goals'? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relativel\
brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future i
J,)e• ,ne orolec c: imp..` •
s ill " �r; irlQl<<u,_._ i"- `e,_
I1u1 cumuiativeiN, con uer.lole '
(A project's impact on tv.o or
8
Yes Maybe No
more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.) X
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly? x
Environmental Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ---
I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
it--% mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. �/
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. !\
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required_
Patrizi: \'Iaterassi
Planning Director
I
Date Signature
For Cit\ of Grand Terrace
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
lb. Earth. Will the proposal result in disruptions, displacement, compaction or
overcovering of this soil?
Yes. However, the grading plan requires review and approval of the City Engineer
and the Planning Director to avoid any negative impacts on the environment.
3b,f: Water. Will the proposal result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
rate and amount of surface run-off?
Yes. The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovermg of
a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper
drainage methods and implementation of an erosion control plan by September,
1993, prior to the rainy season, reviewed, approved and monitored by the Building
and Engineering Department. The erosion control plan and future site development
will significantly improve the current drainage situation.
6a. Noise. Will the proposal result in increases in existing noise levels?
Yes. The existing noise levels may increase as a result of the development of
residential uses in an area that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the
allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan
and monitored within the City Noise Ordinance by the code Enforcement Officer.
8 Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area''
Yes The existing land use will cha„ge from vacant land to single family re- 'ient..:
uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan and monitored by the Planning '
Department
11 Population Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate
of the human population of an area'
`r e• z me nroiec- is, residential aeveloO!e--, wnich will draw additional
Donuiat_on to the immeaiate area within me parameters of this project increasing. the
location and density of the population consistent with the City's General Plan
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Yes. This project subdivides tracts which will create a demand for additional
residential housing consistent with the City's General Plan.
13a. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
Maybe. The project will eventually become a residential development, thus creating
increased vehicular movement to the existing traffic circulation pattern. The
Tentative Tract Map will make available 15 residences. The CMP thresholds for
TIAs are 250 dwelling units. The project will not generate enough vehicle trips to
require a TIA nor exceed any of the Grand Terrace residential thresholds of 100
dwelling units. However, this project will be conditioned to pay a traffic mitigation
fee per trip added to the traffic system.
16e. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial
alterations to the storm water drainage?
Maybe In terms of storm water drainage. Pavement of property may increase
volumes of storm water ran-off. Yet, proposed retention basins may hold oil
sediments and slow down speed of water. As mitigation measure, the project is
conditioned to provide adequate drainage facilities to accept drainage from Blue
Mountain and properties to the East. Mitigation measure may include requirement
for drainage study
21c Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively considerable'
Yes Additional traffic will cumulatively add to Barton Road v3.LLme and affect
service levels of major city intersections therefore mitigation measure is required
Project is conditioned to pay traffic improvement fee wherever it is installed
proportionately to the amount of trips it generates
Maybe In terms of storm water drainage Pay ement of property may increase
volumes of storm water run-off 'et proposed retention basins may hold oil
sediments and slow down speed of water A> mitigation measure the project is
conditioned to provide aaeauarc drainage tacit :its to accent drainage trom Blue
`ouri`..:i i and properties to me E.a s: M1I1g:tioi treasure mad induce requirement
for drainage study in order to avoid potential cumulative impacts
6r
A
o 12-1 1065
"LW
MEMORANDUM
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
California 92324-5295
Civic Center TO. Patri zi a Materassi , Planning Director
(909)824-6621
Fax(909) 783-7629 FROM Joseph KiLak, City Engi neer(
DATE June 4, 1993
SUBJECT Tentative Tract No. 14078 - Revised
Byron R.Matteson Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval .
Mayor
General Comments:
onald M Christianson (1) Pico Street
Mayor Pro Tempore
Gene Carlstrom (a) Median island as proposed would prevent direct access for ea
Herman Hilkey bound traffic to lots 13, 14 and 15, requiring U-turn at the
Jim Singley end of median island.
Council Members
(b) Parcels on south side of Pico Street east of Blue Mountain
Thomas J Schwab Court would likewise need to travel easterly, make a U-turn
'vlanaecr , before traveling weste'-i y on Pico Street
kc ) The trees proposed to De retained, especially the date palms
in the meaian are not the most desirable trees for public
right-of-way median - review of this proposal is recommended
pr �r to approval However, if the Planning -+aff and the
Planning Commission feels they should remain Engineering nas
no problems
(2) No topography is shown easterly of the easterly tract boundary The
steep slopes above and to the east of the tract will generate a
large amount of run-off Provisions for the run-off shouic be
incicated especially as , 1 effect the proposed reservoir
zre -eservoir anc _a:- - c 11 and 15 of said tract
cacnme - - - - an- -- a _ -
E.csements
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval
1 Pico street
Attachment C
Patrizia Materassi
June 4, 1993
Page 2
(a) Dedicate to provide for 33' of right-of-way (1/2 street) if median
island is to be retained, otherwise 30' half-street.
(b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from median island curb.
(c) Dedicate and construct a standard cul-de-sac at the east end of Pico
or provide turn around facilities acceptable to C.D.F.
2. "A" Court
(a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way and standard
cul-de-sac. (As per General Plan Circulation Element.)
(b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline, and standard
cul-de-sac.
3. Construct standard roadway between curbs. Provide for traffic index of 6.
4. Construct standard sidewalks. (Please note - No sidewalks are proposed on
the west side of "A" Court - These are required as per Local Street - San
Bernardino County Std. No. 104. Potential alternative is to consider "A"
�;, Court a "Frontage Road and Street" as per San Bernardino County Road
Department Standard 106a - "Residential", designate all of the area
southerly of the south line of Lot 4 and 4 feet west of the westerly curb
line of "A" Court a lettered lot to be dedicated to the City and included
in the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, with the maintenance
cost for said landscaping to be paid for by the property owners of Tract
14078 PROPOSAL FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT WEST OF WEST CURB LINE OF COURT "A"
IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
5 install ornamental street lights
6 Provide adequate drainage facilities
(a) To accept the drainage from the east, indicating the facilities
being provided and the method of disposal
7 Construct sanitary sewer to serve all lots klt"
e Landscaping and Lighting District shall be formed for the purpose of
'iaintaining the street lionting ano landscaping
.,-t a , the ea,, --emen:_ a- _.._c- Mac ,ct
10 Comply with all of the requirements of u B J.
11 Pay off or split any outstanding sewer bonds issued pursuant to CSA 70
Zone H A D No 1
'-Th, Patri zi a Materassi
June 4, 1993
Page 3
12. Pay all fees as per current ordinances.
13. Plant street trees as required by the Planning Department.
14. Obtain clearance from.
(a) State of California, Department of Water Resources for any work to
be done within their right-of-way, and permit for any facilities to
be so constructed.
(b) Southern California Edison Company for any work to be done within
their right-of-way.
15. The developer has provided for a settling basin location in the southwest
corner of the parcel . The maintenance responsibility shall be with the
developer during the existence of the basin. Basin shall be properly
fenced to prevent access except for maintenance purposes. More detail is
lgyired with respect to directinq the run-off to the basin, capacity of
the basin and construction details. The construction and maintenance
costs should be secured by a cash deposit, and the basin must be completed
prior to September 30, 1993.
16. File a "Notice of Intent" with DWR pursuant to the provisions of NPDES
Permit for the San Bernardino County Valley Cities.
17. Coordinate with the property to the west for grading and drainage
facilities along the westerly line.
18 All improvements to be aesigned by owner's Civil Engineer to the
specifications of the City
JK/ct
,
•
I ire I.otecrfon r lenn(ng Serv1ce9 • County Governrncrt Cenrcr CO. '_�` C _�`� S� ��,
1E5 No Arrowhead Avenue First FIoor • San Bernardiro, CA 92415 OI86 r`=CL OF ��f 1C SAFETY
t7141 367 4212 387 4213 DICK �I�IL t
� l,. AMS Dlrecro.
EMERGENCY SERVICES
-,J;i; :+ -5 'i+ � • s , __ _;�, r!%r
wss
1.
APR l 9 p9;i
GRAND TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROV•L ar� #; .,,.-:,.i,
�_ �a
Date. apt,LQ i 6-i ('''Z
To: 41IP , CT:AA-4 Tis-oc
A - efici.
. ... Y1-11,4,01N3
F lre Department •eference Number: 'r" M gi ^ 64221 / `f c3-0i /
kyM 1
1 v, _ ;a1.t 1 //j 0 J
J �� -
Loeatl on: ( Cb 34 M
THE FO;I OWING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMP_L T ED PRIOR TO
REC RZ- T_4N OF THE FINAL MAP:
Bs _ 5 ectlon final re , _
P a _s _ uurcd to ver_f- corc�t - a
have aeon -let '- - �_
Private roan mia: -tenance _::C_-.-._ -a- _ -
grao,ra a c. snow Tema/al,/al, snail De4 ^rOvlcec r { - --„, cCC -_
-`'-.f(`fail ,fie s_. , itted to the fie cepa:tnient oa._; „1--SC_.- __c-' _ `-r-
tre access roads ?.._ pi ovide an al �veaatne: surface =,, '_..
La _
paving I_ctn of twent.. t 20 ) feet '�°� '`-LitateZ , s. ....A.4,144.0.N e,!...4'7, j..e.....t. (=0, t..t.e•keirkt �Jr - `('"" '`I C ,�-�.� v `Er--
� i
R 41,) water systems des:cnec to meet tne r2 rea flre
cave opme-o shall to aprrovea o e _ - _,
���risc�ct__, ^-�A y _`- ^�- _ t.. __re �2r�*-----_ _-1
ce =__ per sr,a_- _sr tie `___e =e ar_-,e _.o
:op�.e� o_ ---e date= - -se.- 1^^-ov - -
s-a _ ne -=e=at:_ =-= a=:o:ec o•- =-e = -_-- - - -
- �-1.. _ __------ -
ceLerninec �
ta ap.-^=cpr;ate ca1 cu_`=ions , Ls_r'g ore San eer-laro,
Count Y Gt._ce For t=e Determination of Fire F,.Lw ' Water systens - a,__
have m,.n1--1,:ri eignt t 8 1 ;ncn mai r s, si), t 5 f I' c ' r_scrs.Re
qU -- _s 60 T`steo at
Attachment
.
Page Three
Fire Dept. Ref. No. •t22- .!
77AfTWET---1
BP F6. A minimum fuel modification zo e s iggiA 3t.
comply with county standards.
county RE WARDEN '
BP 4110 Prior to framing construction, approved fire hydrants and
fire h : ant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall
be six ( 6) inch in diameter with a minimum of one four ( 4) inch and one
two and a half ( 2 1/2) incn connection as specified by the fire
department The design of 'c,ne fire hydrant and fire hydrant pavement
marker shall be approved by the fire department.
All fire hydrant spacing shall be three nundred (300) feet wi.tn the
exception of single family residential which may be increased to six
hundred ( 600) feet maximum.
In areas where snow removal occurs or non -paved roads exist the bltAe
reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post three feet
from the hydrant.
BP 8. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each
roadwa ne hundred and fifty (150) feet or mor th. Cul-de-sac
length shall not exceed six hundred ( 600) feet, except as identified in
the development code and a...* (1.ffiattatako 01,44,A, 4pproved by the fire chief. it.ems,
(AV ee attacn �. diagram of app oved turnaraunes
TFE FOLLOWING CONDI:ICNS SHALL BE CO:-TLET.. ;RICR TC O:CJPk.:�
_ F 9 Pr_cr to ±_ra1 .insp ct_c , c c imne:c_a_ cr _ r:,st la' ✓ ^_
shad =ost sti e e aci_ress wT_trs a -1- '__T m - Inc- ,, _o
rs
Street aac e . De snail D t 1 SSeS S a visible _-C"1 Lh? Szre2L 3*` ,',,,rl;.y t}'C- ''•�,�r y
of darkness tnev shay_ oe autorat_ca11ti _I_= _^ated J
'There u:i 1c-.c setbacks excee^ c-e n-ncre- feet
.
add1tyonal -0-1-j--�-.ate,? co._rast_-g - _ __ _ __-> _ -__:-Der_:e_. _ a
2_sp:eyed at roper _, access e-'tre-ce
Page Two
Fire Dept Ref . i :
-saf�'��3-
;=
,PR ig I
� I9�3
R F-2A. In areas without water serving utili ie
protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 an. be �1`71:t1 ri)► '
prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a mini ' ,' ij `ei : a��� ,
with gravity flow or an a
system. See attached approved NFPA 13, 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler
Private water supply requirements.
R F-23. MS-IL3 ThROUGH IL5. Water systems aesigned to meet the
required fire flow shall be operational and approved by the fire
department prior to framing construction occurring. The required fire
flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San
Bernardino County "Guide For the Determination of Required Fire Flow, "
In areas without water serving utilities, the fire protection water
system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing.
All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow
or an approved NFPA 13 , 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler system.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
EING ISSUED:
BP 3 The San Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden
Departm provides fire protection for the City of Grand Terrace. P-.o•
to any construction occurrina on any palcel , t^e applicant shall Cc n
the fire aepart-nen for \e_:f. _ of -rent _-
`- _
cevelopmer- reu_reme is = ^ec. =or s}-a , _�1 -
l- _emcnt _ ato cat -
coces , orc_narces c sta*iaares -e - -- - --� `
BP F ! Tnis ce Je_opme-t snail
l c o- ;,_z — -L -' ...<G� .,e _-_Coid-t-G',S aGGdCn`ec by Count_ DeNielo^"-e-` Coca - _� ,e're_ = _s' ocated l _ __e ' rama
BP S Pr_cr _c _ -- er.-- cc,s-_ c _ �- �c - - -
,ecera1..rc- oe -a'-cv c.c __ eac"a = _... _ _a _ _---_- __--
1 �
Page Four Fire Dept Ref . No.TrAik PP-A a -I
`rAPoVEb
fi ep - - ,n I
hea appliance in which solid or liquid fuel i s&&Il 91:a-ix'3b
maintained with an approved spark arrester. It shall onstructed o
stainless steel, copper or brass, woven galvanized
(12) gauge minimum of three-eighths (3/8) inch minimum jr w 0q
inch maximum openings, as per County Code 3381. Tree mesh shall be '
visible from the ground. No decorator caps allowed.
o F-11. The dev- opment and each phase thereof snail hate
two (2) *n
points of vehicular access for fire and other eerge
equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required by the development code.
O F-12. Private roadways which exceed one hundred and
fift 0) feet in length shall be approved by the fire
having "�artaen�
jurisdiction, and shall De extended to within one hundred fifty
(150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall ,
be provided within fifty ( 50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade
between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty ( 30)
percent Where the access road cannot be provided, a fire protection
system shall be provided as required and approved oy the fire
department
n F13 An appr c 'ec fire oe^ rti c< _ rec -
Li-Av adtcr at-c elec�r=c sec:.._r_ .. c ti seo --
s Ji_c- `c i_act _''zs ce `or l^^V_�.,.�. - '_ _ �T __
�_ GG - -= Fire ey__ _s"`='"s r _ ..
acu._ eo - - -
r _14 CVde Sta^care _l�- ~ - .` _ vY__.� �._ - �-
-
rs
5
S.;�i_ F 1 .,, aclt�. ^y =e .,_re"le.`ts mai, De _ __ea ,,z
-_e 1'lr`J '^" :c F -"-
eclaratIon use -,P_ Qa _ _
f
t
DRIVEWAY DESIGN 1LLISTRAT1O SI — _ i I
FIRE APPARATUS — PUMPER 1 APRfa�3 I f
70' SAit BERNARDINO r
1----t
COJN7Y FiRF WARDEN
�� -35'
1. s'
-.
N I-
i r
1 22 _ r
NE1cz
j
EGURE 20t 1 , E t k`
A1 1 1
HAMMER—HEAD
TURN—AROUND -
zc*k i".=20' FIGURE i
20' s'
''-�--�^^--;-- r I 1
r r r 2 a'X., 1 ;�-----
1
I "...I^ _
I
I i - -
,I O I ,
♦'
1 '
r
251
I \ `. . T
f \ i ' 0 ' -
I ,
INTEP 1,iEJI TE
TURN-AROUND PRNAT E S7. _ CUL - DE - SAC )
5(ALG I r 20 _ -;f= wG v-:'
Page
Fire Dept. Ref. No ''!P"�`: °ib.1et
NON-STANDARD CONDITION.
1• L.r1 •
2. E WARDEN
3 .
4 .
Questions and comments may be directed to:
Fire Protection Planning
County Goverment Center, First Floor
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
Sar, Bernardino, California 92415-0186.
Phone (909) 387.4213 .
Thank you for your cocperat=.on
Sincerely,
D;,% I.. .; D?ISCOLL, --_e'
County =__e Warce
n -
e.
BY r r
Ernv_eQ am1ee
Fire P: to tier =_a- .ne Officer
� t -
co/ ms;(372conl— 4 /9 i e
Page aHl. Fire Dept. Ref. No. Tana-02e-i
APPROVED
NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS:
•
• �►•�s •_ - --- ' -
SAN E NARU(NO
_ I ONTY FIR Y; •OEN
aQi• 4e, • t, 6i Pviiz
hpriv2, ntatt 0.6 pi 31)pe.4 ..1"e6061
apo ft-eclat:Of
-Lao 54-48r50
ca.e
Questions and comments may be directed to:
Fire Protection Planning
County Goverment Center, First Floor
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92415-0186.
Phone (909) 387-4213 .
Thank you for your cooperation.
S_ncerely ,
DAv ID J DR,I SCOT_, C-_e_
County Fire v4arce-
BY
Ernylee am ee, a7;tain
Fire _ _ to t_c- _=--„ng 0=ricer
Date DC ZO
i =oi ms/GTcomm / ° - J int ,FaQQ
STATE Of CAEtfORN1A—TNC RCSOURCCS AGENCY t'LIL WILSON Govornor
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
1416 NINTH STREET P 0 80X 942836
SACRAMENTO CA 94236 0001
(916)653 5791 V
pf\\*-
May 4, 1993 .C�
\kplAt
\ti 4)- voklA
()
Ms. Maria C. Muett �
City of Grand Terrace tit' ' ji )
22785 Barton Road (i , L
Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 ` Err
\‘/PrcV
The Department of Water Resources received the following
submittals from you for review and comment pursuant to Senate
Bill No. 2161:
Tentative Tract Map 14078 DWR No. 33-RS-36 Date 4/22/93
PLEASE REFER TO T1iJi DWR NO. ASSIGNED TO YOUR SUBMITTAL ON
ALL CORRESPONDENCE OR WHEN MAKING TELEPHONE INQUIRIES TO OUR
OFFICE.
The following action was taken on your submittal.
X Comments: Applicant will need to submit plans showing all
improvements within Department of Water Resources right of
way
JE RTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CONTACT PERSON
Lam- O E__inghouse, Jr
P—ar of Way Agent
(916) 653-1000
asig m` . 199
Attachment E
•
s`� f Gh L k
- 1450 Washington Street * Colton, Ca'ifornna 92324 4 (9C.-) 825-41 28
� 1�
_' : JZ,,Z,20 -- ,
May 5, 1993 _
Maria C. Mueit, - -
Assistant Planner ' - - -,
C ,"ty of Grand Terrace
22.7 5 Barton Road
Grand Terrace/CA, 92324 -
RE: TM 88-02 RI/C_93-047E93-04 - ^
Barney Larger - -
Dear iSs. 1f{22 - _, - .• - -
i,'vess3de itgHla�kc#`' T t -Company has reviewed the Y TrEdid,.t ons o4-the - `,
' ' San Bernardino-County 1<4e Protection Planning DepAttmea't'oi: -
' April 1S, 1993.a The required 1500 GPM @ 20 PSI ca lf:be me£� ' The
Structures requiting-sprinklers will also require-lit_ ved=B k
Fow Device. ,- _ , _ 0`a.l - _
This project has some minor elevation and 24" tradintissioa.watex main
relocation -concerns that will be worked out with to appi{e.ant Ana
his engineer_- - -
C.ncez./ - -
V // E..ge c ea
Genera.. *"a,aces
Attachment F
Uiixtc,d States Soli River riela unite
Department of Conservation 2023 Chicago Avenue#B 14
Agriculture Service Riverside, CA 92507 07--6,.?/-/c
April 16, 1993
Patnzia Materassi,Planning Director
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace,('aiiforma 92324
Dear Patnzia:
We acknowledge receipt of the Environmental Review and Tentative Map Revision for a
15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone in Riverside County,
C'ahforma that was addressed to the USDA Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-
Corona Resource Conservation District for review and comment.
We have reviewed the above Environmental Impact Report and find that
1. There are controversial items in the report within the realm of the Soil Conservation
Service's expertise and responsibilities.
a. We do not find any senous potential problems with soil erosion and/or
flooding within the project area.
b. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or projects.
Js
2 We find that the item listed below should be reviewed by your committee- /c4.)
rvi
a The enure project area contains soils that meet the USDA criteria for Prime
karicultural Lands ,�, ?`
y r--
We appreciate the opportunity to review anti comment on this proposed project.
Sincerely
rL
REepn APR boa
R Be--,= agone-
Disc:. .irlser a1 oms,
cc Shells Lamb, Distract Manager, RCRCD z
Attachment G
VARIANCE (TENTATIVE TRACT 14078)
BARNEY KARGER 7-7-93
Tentative Tract Number 14078 consists of a 9.55+ acre parcel on the
North side of Pico Street at Blue Mountain Court.
It is surrounded on the South by residential parcels of 3 acre and
larger; on the East by a citrus grove and on the West and North by
7200 S.F. single family lots.
The site is constrained by a 60 foot Edison easement along its
North boundary, a 100 foot California Aqueduct easement running
diagonally across the property and by the Riverside Highland
reservoir (Lot "A" ) on its East boundary.
The variances requested are needed to allow a reasonable site
design in relation to all of this parcels encumbrances.
Variances are being requested from the site development standards
shown in Table 18.10.040 of the City Zoning Code. They are
discussed below and summarized in the enclosed table.
1) Lot Area: Nine lots are proposed at less than the
required 20,000 SF. Our lots range in size from 12,970+
SF to 35, 660± SF. Our average net lot size is 20.136 SF.
The density of the project (excluding the reservoir) is
1.75 lots/acre.
2) Lot Width: Three of the lots propose widths of 90' and
94' . The standard being 100' . All lots have ample
building width and minimum side slopes.
3 ) Lot Depth: Three lots will require lot depths of
118 '-140' , the standard being 150' . These depths are
necessary because of constraints imposed by the reservoir
location.
4) Street Frontage: Five lots propose street frontages of
40' , the standard being 50' . This reduced width is
required to allow lots 6-9 to have reasonable. access to
our proposed cul-de-sac, without the cul-de-sac
infringing on the California Aqueduct right-of-way.
Tract 14078 is essentially a buffer between the smaller residential
lots West and North of the site, and the larger parcels South and
East of the site. Our proposed lots are two to four times larger
than the adjacent residential lots. Pico Street, the reservoir,
and topographic constraints separate the Tract from the larger
parcels to the South and East.
The requested variances will allow the flexibility to design the
project in a manner that will fit the considerable constraints
while providing a reasonable buffer between the smaller and larger
parcels in the area.
Attachment H
VARIANCE TABLE
AREA LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH ST. FRONTAGE
LOT NUMBER , STANDARD PROPOSED STANDARD PROPOSED t STANDARD PROPOSED + STANDARD PROPOSED 1
P
1 I I ,
1
2 i 20, 000 SF 16, 600 SF , 100' 90'
v
3 ' 20, 000 SF 15, 590 SF 150' 140'
4 120, 000 SF 17, 890 SF
5 20, 000 SF 16, 090 SF 100' 94'
6 , 50' 40'
7 1 50' 40'
8 50' 40'
9 50' 40'
10 50' 42'
11 20, 000 SF 14, 820 SF 150' 140'
12 ' 20;000 SF 15, 310 SF
13 20, 000 SF 13, 040 SF 150' 118 '
14 i 20, 000 SF 13, 450 SF 100' 90'
` 15 i 20, 000 SF 12, 970 SF 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE August 6, 1993
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE August 12, 1993
SUBJECT DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL
CONFERENCE
This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for October 16-19 in San Francisco The
League is encouraging that all cities be represented at the Business Meeting on Tuesday, October
19, at 10 30 a m at the Moscone Convention Center
The League is asking that each City Council designate a voting representative and an alternate
who will be present at the Business Meeting Each City is entitled to one vote in matters
affecting municipal or League policy
STAFF RECOMMENDS
COUNCIL APPOINT A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE WHO WILL
REPRESENT THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AT THIS YEAR'S LEAGUE ANNUAL
CONFERENCE BUSINESS SESSION
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# &
1 I
'$ League of California Cities
I®® ML `? 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO CA 95814 • (916)444-5790
A®®I
California Cities
Work Together July 13, 1993
To The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From Don Benninghoven, Executive Director
Re Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference
This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Saturday, October 16 through Tuesday,
October 19 in San Francisco One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the
General Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions
Annual Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the
quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California It is important that all
cities be represented at the Business Meeting on Tuesday, October 19, at 10:30 a.m. at the
Moscone Convention Center, Room 134-135.
To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each City Council
should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business
Meeting. The League Bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting
municipal or League policy A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the
City Council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." If the Mayor or a member of the City
Council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these officials will be
designated as the voting delegate. However, if the City Council will not have a registered
delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials
should be designated the voting delegate or alternate
Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of
the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Thursday, September 30, 1993), so that
proper records may be established for the Conference The voting delegate may pick up the
city's voting card at the designated Voting Card Table located in the League Registration Area
If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting
delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by
appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the
exchange Prior to the Business Meeting, the card may be exchanged at the "Voting Card" table
in the League registration area. At the Business Meeting, the "Voting Card" table where the
Credentials Committee will be seated, will be located in the front of the meeting room.
The voting procedures that will be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of
this memo It is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from each city sit together
at the Business Meeting so that if amendments are considered there may be an opportunity to
exchange points of view and arrive at a consensus before each city's vote is cast.
Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated
If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 444-5790
League of California Cities
Annual Conference Voting Procedures
1 Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League
policy
2 To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's
voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee
3 Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an
alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the
Credentials Committee
4 The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card
desk in the conference registration area
5 Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is
permitted
6 If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the
voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the
same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials
Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be
made at the "Voting Card" table in the League Registration Area At the Business
Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the front of the
meeting room
7 Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures.
Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials
Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have left a sample
of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved
8 In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city
official to vote at the Business Meeting
L\pohcy\acres\voteproc
(try � _.
M •�, m
0-:111111 Planning
GRAND TERR•C= Department
EMoE.
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: August 12, 1993
SUBJECT: Application for Outdoor Festival and Carnival
APPLICANT: The First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace
(Non-Profit Organization)
LOCATION: 12354 S Mt Vernon Avenue
RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on Conditions of Approval
******************************
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Chapter 5 60, the applicant has
submitted the attached items for review of an outdoor festival/carnival from September 3-5
refer to Attachment A. The applicant, The First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace,
represented by Pastor Roger Greenwalt and Carnival Coordinator Kelly Squires are before
the City Council to answer any questions regarding this activity
The applicant in accordance with the Code requirements has received approval from the
San Bernardino County Fire Warden's Department and Environmental Health Department
Additionally the applicant has applied for a birsuress license with the City, refer to
Attachment B
Staff has reviewed parking, circulation, noise, schedule, layout, activities, security, First Aid,
liability insurance and business license (for vendors outside of Grand Terrace) The
applicant has indicated that they will only use few outside vendors (for owners of rides)
The church will pay them approximately $325 dollars Any costs of rides or activities the
public has to pay will go directly to the church As such it seems the outdoor activity
vendors will bring in no funds therefore according to the Finance Department any business
which has gross sales less than $1,000 does not require a business license Based on this
information the applicant, First Baptist Church, is only required to apply for a business
license There will be booths mostly operated by volunteers but those rented will bnng in
a minimal amount to the church according to the applicant
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM# tC-
22795 Barton Road• Grand Terrace California 92324-5295• (909) 824-6621
As noted in the letter to the City, August 3, 1993, the applicant does not intend to make a
profit only to break even The intent of the carnival according to the applicant is to provide
exposure of their church to the community Additionally, the applicant is requesting a
waiver on any City fees which at this time are the business license fees and signage costs
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council to make a motion of approval for proposed activity
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 Compliance with the City of Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8 108 No
construction, removal of any outdoor festival/carnival activity shall be allowed prior
to 7 00 a m nor later than 10 30 p m
2 The festival/carnival shall close by 10 00 p m
3 Compliance with the Fire Warden's Department recommendations
4 Compliance with the Environmental Health Department recommendations
5 Completion of appropriate business licenses for applicant and any outdoor activity
vendors that have gross sales more than $1,000
6 Subject property, other businesses, or parkings lots in other areas shall be cleared of
festival activities, equipment, posters, balloons or fliers within one week of the
festival
7 Appropriate permits for banners, temporary signs, balloons shall be required from
the City Planning Department prior to installation
8 No structures, banners, signs or balloon arches will be allowed to cross the public
right of way or cross the public streets
9 Proof of liability insurance shall be on file with the City Finance Department
Respectfully Submitted,
, ,,,V)tk . -----r-ikA51)
Patrizia Materassi,
Community Development Director
Attachments A - Application Packet
B - Business License
August 3, 1993
Grand Terrace City Hall
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
To Whom It May Concern
The First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace is planning a carnival to give our church exposure
within the community of Grand Terrace and to get prospects for our upcoming Vacation Bible
School for children The carnival is scheduled for September 3-5 (Friday through Sunday of
Labor Day weekend) The festivities will consist of ten game booths, six fun booths, puppet
and magic shows, three food booths, and free fun events for children A small charge (25 or
50 cents) will be required for game and fun booths All activities will be located on the church
property at 12354 S Mt Vernon Ave in Grand Terrace All events will be held outdoors
except for the puppet and magic shows
We are planning to promote the event by putting 60 color posters in Grand Terrace businesses,
handing out flyers, and mailing_letters to 100 churches in San Bernardino and Riverside We
h L« ~ lce to spread a banner across Mt Vernon (from the church property to the Jr High
property) and erect a 30 foot balloon arch Because this is our first time to sponsor such an
event, we can only predict the outcome with uncertainty Our "guesstimate" is to accommodate
a crowd of 200 people at any one time We have qualified people who are donating their time
handle First Aid and Security
To subsidize the carnival, we are checking into the possibilities of renting ten booth spaces to
individuals or businesses for $50 each We, as a church, are non-profit The carnival is being
planned not to make money but to break even in the finances, even if booth space was sold
Note the booths mentioned in the first paragraph are all sponsored by the church and operated
by church volunteers
For further information, contact Roger Greenwalt, pastor (825-8042 or 683-5654) or Kelly
Squires, carnival coordinator (783-9280)
Sincerely,
Roger Greenwalt, pastor
7177—A GIB M 61\57- A
August 3, 1993
Grand Terrace City Hall
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Re Request for Waiver of Fees for Carnival
To Whom It May Concern
The First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace is planning a carnival for September 3-5 to give our
church exposure within the community of Grand Terrace and to get prospects for our upcoming
Vacation Bible School for children This is a non-profit venture and we are only charging pnces
for carnival events to break even financially As a smaller church, we do not have much money
to invest We are planning to invest a total of$1,500 and hope to recoup most of it It is very
difficult for us to get the initial monies together as well as risking the monies If the carnival
is moderately successful, we expect to only get our original investment back. Therefore, we
request that the City of Grand Terrace waive any fees normally charged to sponsor such a
festival For further information, contact Roger Greenwalt, pastor (825-8042 or 683-5654) or
Kelly Squires, carnival coordinator (783-9280)
Sincerely,
Roger Greenwalt, pastor
CARNIVAL SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Fnday, September 3
Operating Hours 5PM - 10PM
10 Game Booths
6 Fun Booths
3 Food Booths
Puppet Show at 7PM
Magic Show at 8PM
Saturday, September 4
Operating Hours LOAM - 10PM
10 Game Booths
6 Fun Booths
3 Food Booths
Puppet Shows at 3PM, 5PM, and 7PM
Magic Show at 4PM, 6PM, and 8PM
Free Special Events for Children from 12noon - 5PM
Sunday, September 5
Operating Hours 2PM - 10PM
10 Game Booths
6 Fun Booths
3 Food Booths
Puppet Shows at 4PM and 8 30PM
Magic Show at 2PM and 7 30PM
CARNIVAL
Game Booths Fun Booths Food Booths
Darts Dunk Tank Hamburgers and Hot Dogs
Golf Putter Face Painting Baked Potatoes
Ring Toss Mouse-a-rama Sweet Tooth
Basketball Shot Bumper Room
Bean Toss Pony Ride
Tic Tac Toe Train Ride
Fish Bowl
Trash Can Disk
Incline
Hook on the Nose
Special Shows Puppeteers, Magic show, and Clowns
Free Special Events for Children (ages 7 -12) on Saturday
Egg Toss
Water Shoot
Watermelon Eating Contest
Balloon Stomp
Bucket Bngade
Three-legged Race
Free Special Events for Children (ages 6 and under) on Saturday
Art Creations
Bubble Factory
Edible Jewelry
Jello Eating
rn' 14ror
s ‘ tors404. 14
4,
.... s, .
, , ,\,.:. . ,„, or,c....
„--,- , , 6=
j\-0-°'411 it
1 4\ P\
,,h?
4 4,.1\
\ - la --4t& E'D - 7'. .4:ho
CJ - -)(t-
ek"
vl M
�y`�'r , 1 C1 a 2..
0 li-4
ss+woM
Rack tom - - -WI
_se
___? ri g.E 4ccET ofF MT. vORNo4 _
I' nKtn^KU��
1 N
W
F f
® —'N ¢
Li1
ETON yvL
� ` - —- ...III:uuuuu.uulilu .. N��
El
-IN .11Pri.„„ 4kss .♦
LINSIv* •
.1., • ;, L - - - — �EZ��arm:WI& , %ta
. VON.°
. $4%\<<
I \),ASZI(
. -1 giO •iu t NNW my liras,
, "MOv ' •
Imp `• oy, '• '‘A * • , •
I . - *-‘9"1‘
: y� .. ,:fE \ I 104°
,♦
11011 pINES JYOR KIN V
Si. W di 1
IT7 WY
1 I ■ I _ N- liiill
_+ • ,0A
J ifl
a 1111���!�..1 ■i
i i
L.. _ _ PALM �� 7
in
1
L-, IIIIIIIIII III
�L' 11- R Q E]�
L _ __ — z
—ffl R air'
I
_ — l fT i
111111 P '�� CENTER CITY CT
I + CLUB
10 77 F.:
1 - y 012 rni La III_
a • I
l 1 + I ; I i !
— (^'l fTTrT rt1��TT�T Lu PAIR _tin ST
t I I I I I I W I JET' i 1 ' T� ' i W 2 I 1 ' ' • I ' 1
aii
I I ! I r
_- IW IL ,,' _ .4 } JETS + T
Q - r �I]1 1a I _0YrT1�`I-- Oe SOTO ST I + 1 iI _�m 0. SOTOS F x 0e SOTO I j I I ST
J I W 1
1 m 1 i i /`
1' I =
1R3 �.`t-a J� ( 7ERR ACE +
1 1 ' - J TERRACE HILLS 11
J HILLS WREN
"ULMAR PL -- 3 JR HIGH SCHOOL
' I
r �—t 4 _ I kv I Q COMMUNITY ----�l 1 1 . ,� PUU o4' '. I +
/IS ST - -
h FINCH
. I ` --
I
I a_ i ...\7 I ! I I T T71
777
/� 1
/ , I ! l
CARDINAL SI L CAR0IHAL 1
I ` I I 1 I I I I
_ 1 >F it - I- t-� F
— W 1 -\.4 ' US \ R�*•17�ST BLUEBIRD I
{1 r
a 3 I I - _1 _ , = , 'N I ' I 3 I v
I1 1 I T ¢ Z
_ z
' T , t ( II , ' „ „ ! 1111I11 ni ► ► Ii11i Iit � 1IIIIIIIIIIII1
5 56 010--5 60 020 l
1
Chapter 5.56
SOLICITING MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIRS
Sections:
5 .56.010 Business prohibited.
5.56.020 Prohibited.
5.56. 010 Business prohibited. It is unlawful for any
person, firm or corporation to engage in the business of
soliciting motor vehicle repair, towing or other service
work, or offering to perform motor vehicle repair, towing or
other service work, upon the public roads or highways within
the city, for which repair, towing or other service work a
charge is to be made, or is made, or a sum of money paid.
(Ord. 1 §1 (part) , 1978 : county code §41. 061)
5.56.020 Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to
solicit motor vehicle repair, towing or other service work,
or offer to perform motor vehicle repair, towing or other
service work, upon the public roads or highways within the
city, for which repair, towing or other service work a
charge is to be made, or a sum of money paid. (Ord. 1 §1
(part) , 1978- county code §41.062)
, Chapter 5. 60
OUTDOOR FESTIVALS
Sections: _"_- M �_ _�- __ s
5 60 010 Applications to city
5 60 020 Application to county--County provisions
adopted.
5. 60 010 Applications to city The applicant to con-
duct an outdoor festival shall file with the city an appli-
cation for such event, specifying the date, time , location,
names of the proponents of the event, and any other informa-
tion which may be required by the city for such an event
The application shall be presented to the city council for
consideration If such application is approved, the appli-
cant shall be required to obtain a city business license
5 60 020 Application to county--County provisions
adopted. The applicant shall �ren =_le ar applicatior with
one count% e 'vironmental healtr serti , ces , and shall compl'
with all the requirements of the provisions of the San
122
5 64 010--5 64 020
Bernardino County Code relating to outdoor festivals , which
sections are adopted by reference
Chapter 5. 64
PEDDLING, SOLICITING AND HAWKING
Sections:
5 . 64. 010 Definitions.
5 64. 020 License required.
5. 64. 030 Application for license.
5. 64.040 Term--Renewal--Changes in status.
5. 64. 050 Investigation--Requirements.
5. 64. 060 Scope of license--Hours--Permission--
Conformance to law.
5. 64. 070 Fees
5 .64. 080 Fixed place of business.
5. 64. 090 Wholesalers--Farmers.
5.64. 100 Veterans.
5. 64. 110 Religious, scientific and charitable
organizations.
5. 64. 120 Elderly, young, disabled or blind persons.
5. 64. 130 Revocation of license.
5 .64.010 Definitions . As used in this chapter, the
following terms shall have the meanings set forth in this
section:
A. "Hawking" means offering merchandise for sale on
the streets by outcry or by attracting the attention of per-
sons by exposing goods in a public place, or by placards,
labels or signals
B "Peddling" means selling merchandise which is
transported from place to place in the course of approaching
prospective customers or selling merchandise or services
from door to door
C "Soliciting" means asking or inviting persons to
pay money in return for merchandise or services to 5C de-
livered in the future , or asking for charitable donations.
(Ord 1 §1 (part) , 1978 county code 541 . 051)
5 64 020 License required Except as provided in Sec-
tions 5. 64. 080 and 5 64 . 090 , it is unlawful for any person
to engage in the business of peddling or hawking goods ,
wares , merchandise , fruits or vegetables , or of soliciting
orders for goods or services , or of offering services for
repair or improvement of real property exceeding twenty-five
dollars in cost or value , or of soliciting donations for a
charitiv in an open puD__c place or aoor to aoor, witnin the
city, without first having secured a license therefor as
123
'''''' i,USINESS LICENSE APPLICATION
'TY OF GRAND TERRACE
JSINESS LICENSE DIVISION
NANCE DEPARTMENT
'795 BARTON ROAD
ZAND TERRACE, CA 92324 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE CLEARLY
—
115INESS NAME
F'cS+ BelD175+ C rAu rcl... QC 5 d le r{ace- (0)og) $ D s—do c
DURESS ° STRUT CI TATE IF ;
123SL-1 5 P"* 1Je(non Gcamd f cco G A q -3 -9
All 1DCRFrS (if different from ahoy )
c, F t' Ic,I,A ) TYPI rt ,tWNF1"I1I1 "r'LI (1.0f•1 II itRSIIII I-1 FAI.TE'Elc.CIIII 11 I
C
' ,..i.,..i. ,t( IIRITY tIItP'it `- Ftl`FI"l Tr, `�t I (� - � - 35Li i 3 1 7
:f It till nAnr tlfir r fa d t>
st � rrti nc' I,rirl Heil or ofT it ntancr Or princl,�aI ^ffl�c'r —I
� r dunRoo\e.0 GC-e.eilv_i_,G-1.-k-- Ircx.s-1-- C
)
Carno vc�
__...., K-e))y 51 vire5
t.Rt ,.
9)3 1 (^0,bart C%fcit t9. 9/y asc_G-1
ry c (ATC /IF rrd)F fill, E (904) 1 CITY SraIE /IF tc`tr P, c ,,_ t9D`1
the r-$'c C 6 (12 SO7 663 S65, re,ncl /cuffv.c, nA �2329 783-9z�3o
us _ iocated Ln Grand Terrace 'ii' i le I IrensP Tax I-. ba,..,`,i ,Ion nro s rec"lpts,
xcth the exception of contractors). AMOUNT DT S
v�1 EL r 7r)� ,"1111 1 I II I I PIT (ALF Ni`, (r ,r $ 1'e• --Ir.I nt 'I aunt
I ,I .1) 000
c 'r in `Toss ^ere-Irt r'x .St''edu le cn `-c I, of tor rtl
1 ,1 x drI9 v111 `I 1I" 'f`,cn t.t)., -f ,IE LTri PF14,I r 'root San cernarr'lno ' o it)
-s i ness operated ccsrr of d res iae^oe n :,rand terrace Pe , rT I^e ,m ur- -u '-c- gross ece I its -=F E c`-e-- -' "^
P^ r I
1 A DUNT Oil- ,
- ,..,- J.(,cy - - , c I' r -I -r c ,..1
o-`'actors
aI I„ > , , I Drnla "'LA"'"'LA"' =c-^r's I tce^so s-)is -
"-cicp 'S r US ,E: -,r Ic" - Ill' 1:r 'LASS II LJ
c^•-rjI ^^---c ' i -C , rt i' I
I I otttr , I 'riser -r- c , rrs '0 ,nnt I\ I AMOUNT Olt S 1f
1, ;ill -cc (-trat 4-or _ .,t I I no eor,c I ^) -int I y of c.renti Tor re,.r I I s` i I I ^air s and address on a -en r ' - •.`1--=`
neI t nspen*inns dIt - t c run' )nt I ' I SIr c)r tr Or rot - n avr nn`a I ne'1 J t I -' rtls I ne',s LI cense
errtal Incase Prcper-v -I ^ - - t, ,- ^•'s', gore I-s Tax St ^n-It le ^^ -ec- 'rl lI
-r - ar crn,- - - ,-s I I nr Trlr, r-x r I +v 1 AMOUNT UtLE S
-- ,'TD GP(' .r c EC I . ^ i I I- -, I t - _ Tt'r'L `J1=c 'r -?r T-L 'iNI i-
pus l ness NOT located in Grand Terrace but doi na business 1 n the C i+y 1
.1:0 t�ernI no eTotant -I_' ^nr - Ia' '1'-n -cheat]I rn ti c I. of onn i ArDIRCT DLE S f
Vending/Amusement Machines Ise`rr,II ^t. Inc tint It( Ircm Cross Receipts Tex 5cheduIe on
A1tib(INT DLE S
I ,L,, )f four - -
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED WITH THE APPLICATION/RENEWAL
I- T�
{+ BUSINESS NAME. 1} I ( 4- `1 l 15 C1�,Uc(k Cc`
DEAR BUSINESS OWNER/OPERATOR:
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PASSED A83251 IN SEPTEMBER 1992, WITH AN EFFECTIVE
DATE OF JANUARY 1, 1993. THE BILL REQUIRES THAT EVERY EMPLOYER WHO APPLIES FOR
OR RENEWS A BUSINESS LICENSE MUST PROVIDE PROOF VALID WORKER'S COMPENSATION
INSURANCE OR PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH SELF—INSURANCE PROVISIONS.
AB3251 SEC 2 SECTION 3711 OF THE LABOR CODE IS AMENDED TO READ _
3711 (A) EVERY EMPLOYER WHO APPLIES FOR ANY LICENSE OR FOR RENEWAL OF ANY
LICENSE FORA BUSINESS ISSUED TO PURSUANT TO SECTION 37101 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
OR SECTION 7284 OF THE RENEWAL AND TAXATION CODE SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN A ,
DECLARATION THAT STATES THE FOLLOWING
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I HEREBY AFFIRM, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, ONE OF THE FOLLOWING
DECLARATIONS. .
I HAVE AND WILL MAINTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT TO SELF—INSURE FOR
WORKERS' COMPENSATION, AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 3700, FOR THE DURATION OF
ANY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED FOR WHICH THIS LICENSE IS ISSUED.
E2r l HAVE AND WILL MAINTAIN WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE, AS REQUIRED
I1��11 BY SECTION 3700, FOR THE DURATION OF ANY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED it
FOR WHICH THIS LICENSE WAS ISSUED.
r
MY WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE CARRIER/POLICY NUMBER:
CARRIER: Free°frel /41}-wQ-1 s. Ca
POLICY NUMBER: (47 O O -) — /
— I CERTIFY THAT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF a,NY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES FOR WHICH
THIS LICENSE IS ISSUED I SHALL NOT EMPLOY kNY PERSON IN kNY MANNER SO
AS TO BECOME SUBJECT TO THE WORKERS ' COMPENSATION LAW OF CALIFORNIA, AND
AGREE THAT IF I SHOULD BECOME SUBJECT TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3700 OF THE LABOR CODE, I SHALL FORTHWITH COMPLY
WITH PR VISIONS OF SECTION 3700
s-DC F9 ) 3
A LIC^TTS SIGNATURE NAME/TITLE (PRINT) DATE
WARNING FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL
SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND TO CIVIL FINES UP TO
$100,000, IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED
FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF lxr, LABOR CODE, INTEREST AND ATTORNEY S khES.
NOTE PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN WITH YOUR APPLICATION/RENEWAL AND PAYMENT
YOUR COOPERATION IS APPRECIATED IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL
TEE CITY OF GRAND TERRRACE BUSINESS LICENSE DIVISION AT (909) 824-6621