The URL can be used to link to this page

04/13/198922795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 LL Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Gene Carlstrom Barbara Pfenmghausen Jim Smgley Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager April 13, 1989 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursdays — 6 00 p in Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 _L-+GAS f._s"�.•iksl^L .!m [ l - _ .�u T V _ H-.w sM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order * Invocation - Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call April 13, 1989 600PM STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 Approval of 3/23/89 Minutes Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1 Items to De ete 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A PROCLAMATION - RICHARD ROLLINS Present B COMMENDATION - "PRIDE OF HOME AWARDS" Present (1) Bea Gigandet (2) Mr & Mrs Brian Harber (3) Mr & Mrs John Helt 3 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion Approve A Approve Check Register No 041389 B Ratify 4/13/89 CRA Action C Waive full reading of ordinances on agenda COUNCIL AGENDA 03/23/89 - Page 2 of 2 D Approve 3/23/89 Minutes E City Manager's Attendance at the 1989 Legislative Seminar F Bond Release - Forest City - Phase I 4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 5 ORAL REPORTS A COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 Emergency Operations Committee Minutes of 1/23/89 2 Historical & Cultural Committee Minutes of 3/7/89 B COUNCIL REPORTS 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 30 P M— A Planning Commission Recommendation to Adopt Z-89-1 B Appeal of Planning Commission Decision SA-88-17 (California Spirits) 7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8 NEW BUSINESS A Report on Plexco Industries in Colton B Consideration of Dedication - Mc Duffy 11830 Mt Vernon Ave 9 CLOSED SESSION ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL/CRA MEETING WILL BE HELD 4/27/89 -------------------------------------------------- AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 4/27/89 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY MANAGER"S OFFICE BY 4/19/89 STAFF RECOMMENDATION COUNCIL ACTION Approve Approve Approve Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 23, 1989 t " , A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 23, 1989, at 6 05 p m PRESENT Byron Matteson, Chairman Hugh J Grant, Vice -Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member ABSENT Thomas J Schwab, Executive Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager John Harper, City Attorney David Sawyer, Community Development Director Juanita Brown, Secretary Joe Kicak, City Engineer None APPROVAL OF MARCH 9, 1989 CRA MINUTES I CRA-89-07 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve March 9, 1989 CRA Minutes APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA032389 CRA-89-08 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY CHAIRMAN MATTESON, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register No CRA032389 Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 10 p m until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, April 13, 1989 at 6 00 p m SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace �t (,-1 ;1.1> 0 hti c 1+. ti !•t { a r �� ;a in,- "RICHARD ROLLINS" WHEREAS, Dick Rollins was a charter member of the Parks and Recreation Committee, and WHEREAS, Dick Rollins has contributed many hours of time and effort in performance of Parks and Recreation programs to benefit the citizens of this community, and WHEREAS, Dick Rollins is continuing to parti- cipate in other committees, contributing many hours to civic affairs, NOW, THEREFORE, I, BYRON R MATTESON, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby extend our gratitude and apprecia- tion to Dick Rollins for his many hours of civic service to the City of Grand Terrace, and wish him well in all his future endeavors /S/ BYRON R MATTESON Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof This 13th day of April, 1989 of City of Grand Terrace Commendation "PRIDE OF HOME AWARD" The City of Grand Terrace hereby commends MRS BEA GIGANDET for her civic pride demonstrated in the area of home beau- tification w = t The Mayor, City Council, and the San Bernardino s Board of Realtorexpress'th'eir appreciation to Mrs Bea Gigandet_ for heaping ,make the City of Grand Terrace a more IIattractive"community s /s/ BYRON R MATTESON Byron R . Matteson,:' Mayor o t e `City of Grand Terrace and of the _ City Council thereof ry f This 13th day of April, 1989 , v f y f City of Grand Terrace Commendation "PRIDE OF HOME AWARD" The City of Grand Terrace hereby commends MR AND MRS BRIAN HARBER for their civic pride demonstrated in the area of home beautification The Mayor, City Council, and the San Bernardino Board of, Realtors express'stheir appreciation to Mr and Mrs Brian_ Harber for helping make the City of Grand Terraced more attractive community S i /s/ BYRON R MATTESON ,a Byron R Matteson'f Mayor of t e City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof z This 13th day of April, 1989 f ? h ✓A d u Y f •.5 4 % Y d n,�a�t 4 4 o-*.� e'"wi'A B Y City of Grand Terrace, Commendation "PRIDE OF HOME AWARD" The City of Grand Terrace hereby commends F MR AND MRS JOHN HELT for their civic pride demonstrated in� the area of home beautification The Mayor, City Council, ai'd `the San Bernardino Board of Realtors express their appreciation to Mr and Mrs John Heft for helping make the City of -Grand Terrace a more attractive community -p 5 " l i t /s/ BYRON R.-MATTESON Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of t e City'of Grand Terrace and of the City Counycil° thereof This 13th_day of`..April, 1989 t y s , J /� l 7 (2 r�i CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ;+ DATE APRIL 13, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 041389 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF APRIL 13, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P6094 PETTY CASH FOR TINY TOTS AND DAY CARE $ 250 75 (Y P6095 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO VIDEO TAPES, PARKS AND RECREATION 22 00 �E P6096 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/89 83 82 N P6097 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/89 275 83 P6098 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/89 194 37 P6099 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/89 294 60 P6100 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/21/89 457 82 P6101 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/21/89 301 42 P6102 SO CA MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC ASSOC REGISTRATION FOR SPRING SEASON, SLO-PITCH 64 00 P6103 CITY OF REDLANDS CONFERENCE FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 5 00 P6104 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES REGISTRATION FOR CITY CLERK ANNUAL CONFERENCE 175 00 P6105 PACIFIC BELL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE, LA CROSSE 27,515 00 P6106 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION OVERLAY STREETS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND SHOULDER WORK ON LA CADENA 43,918 95 P6107 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/22/89 154 43 P6108 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/22/89 124 85 P6109 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/24/89 360 64 P6110 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/24/89 68 86 P6111 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/89 25 37 P6112 CENTER/LOCAL GOVERNMENT TECH ROAD MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE 145 00 P6113 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/89 318 98 P6114 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/89 119 23 P6115 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/89 103 93 P6116 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/89 103 76 P6117 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/4/89 315 38 1 1 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR P6118 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY 19780 ULI-URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 19781 GRAND TERRACE LIONS CLUB 19782 NEW CONCEPT VIDEO RENTAL 19783 SUZETTE DAVIS 19784 CHERYL BLADH 19785 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY 19786 DAN BAILEY 19787 LAVANNE MC COO 19788 BELLE WHITMAN 19789 TIM PENTECOST 19790 TOM ALBERSON 19791 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION 19792 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 19793 RANDALL ANSTINE 19794 AT&T INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 19795 AWARD COMPANY OF AMERICA 19796 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER 19797 BOMAR TREE SERVICE 19798 CA SOCIETY MUNICIPAL FINANCE 19799 CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE APRIL 13, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF APRIL 13, 1989 DESCRIPTION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/4/89 ZONING PUBLICATIONS HALF THE COST OF AIR CONDITIONING AND CEILINGS AT COMMUNITY CENTER REPLACE STOLEN VIDEO TAPES REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM POWER TO SIGNAL AT MOUNT VERNON/BARTON, CUSTOMER OWNED PEDESTAL REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR, KARATE RAISE MANHOLE COVERS AND DEMOLITION OF APARTMENTS ON REED STREET (LESS 10% RETENTION) ANNUAL DUES FOR DAVID SAWYER AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL, 1989 RENT PHONE FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER AWARD PLAQUES BOTTLED WATER AND COOLER RENTAL FOR CIVIC CENTER AND DAY CARE REMOVE /GRIND TREE STUMP AND TRIM TREE SEMINAR MAY 11, 1989 ANNUAL DUES, THOMAS SCHWAB 041389 AMOUNT $ 181 73 46 50 { 3,800 00 125 90 15 00 30 00 362 00 8 00 8 00 8 00 12 53 337 50 25,790 00 162 00 200 00 4 35 139 23 190 60 240 00 35 00 75 00 2 4 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE APRIL 13, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 041389 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR 19800 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 19801 CAL -TYPE OFFICE PRODUCTS 19802 CITY OF COLTON 19803 DIAMOND SECURITY SYSTEMS 19804 ENCHANTED ATTIC 19805 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 19806 FOOTHILL JOURNAL 19807 G T MAILERS 19808 GRAND VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH 19809 HARPER & BURNS 19810 HOLDEN PEST CONTROL COMPANY 19811 HONEYWELL, INC 19812 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC 19813 HOLLY JAMESON 19814 C R JAESCHKE, INC 19815 LAYMON CANDY COMPANY 19816 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE 19817 LOMA LINDA DISPOSAL 19818 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 19819 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 19820 MICHAEL'S STORES, INC OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF APRIL 13, 1989 DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE/ENERGY FOR LIGHTS AT BARTON/215, FEBRUAPY, 1989 OFFICE SUPPLIES WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR APRIL, 1989 AND CONNECTIONS FOR MARCH,- 1989 MAINTENANCE ON SECURITY SYSTEM AT CIVIC CENTER,APRIL- JUNE, 1989 RENT BUNNY COSTUME FOR EASTER EGG HUNT IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARK DISTRIBUTE SPRING FLYERS AND CITY NEWS FOR MARCH, 1989 BURST WASTE WATER DISPOSAL BILLS AND MAIL PICK-UP FOR CIVIC CENTER, FEBRUARY, 1989 RENT FOR DAY CARE, APRIL 15-MAY 15, 1989 LEGAL SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY, 1989 PEST CONTROL AT COMMUNITY CENTER, MARCH, 1989 MAINTENANCE ON HVAC SYSTEM AT CIVIC CENTER, APRIL, 1989 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES FOR PARK INSTRUCTOR, AEROBICS REPAIR LAWN MOWER EASTER CANDY SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS TRASH PICK-UP FOR CIVIC CENTER AND PARK, APRIL, 1989 LOND DISTANCE PHONE TEMPORARY RECEPTIONIST, (3 WEEKS) SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS AMOUNT $ 84 69 65 15 24,256 77 75 00 35 00 79 37 319 50 40 00 450 00 3,289 00 22 00 1,043 00 110 95 67 50 93 36 301 62 131 41 114 05 52 68 974 70 20 79 3 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DAIS APRIL 13, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 041389 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF APRIL 13, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 19821 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY MAINTENANCE ON ELEVATOR, APRIL, 1989 $ 199 05 19822 PACIFIC BELL PHONE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER, DAY CARE, AND CIVIC CENTER 801 21 19823 PAGENET AIR TIME AND MAINTENANCE ON PAGERS, APRIL, 1989 26 00 19824 CORINNE PETTIT INSTRUCTOR FOR LOW IMPACT AEROBICS 114 19 19825 PERRY'S STATIONARY OFFICE SUPPLIES 131 82 19826 PETTY CASH GENERAL PETTY CASH 294 30 19827 PETTY CASH GENERAL PETTY CASH 18 00 19828 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH FOR TINY TOTS AND DAY CARE 286 93 19829 CATHY PIERSON INSTRUCTOR FOR GYMNASTICS AND TINY TUMBLERS 340 80 19830 RESCUE ROOTER CLEAN DRAINS AT PARK 184 50 19831 REGENTS-UC CODE ENFORCEMENT CLASS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYEE WORKSHOP 230 00 19832 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PLANNING SUPPLIES 44 79 19833 ROLLINS BURDICK HUNTER SURITY BOND FOR 1989/1990 175 00 19834 SAGAMORE PUBLISHING RECREATION BOOKLETS 69 40 19835 DAVID SAWYER AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL, 1989 200 00 19836 THOMAS SCHWAB AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL, 1989 291 78 19837 SMART AND FINAL IRIS COMPANY EASTER CANDY AND PAPER SUPPLIES FOR DAY CARE 456 58 19838 SOFTWARE WIZARD RIBBONS AND DISKETTES FOR MICOM 108 65 19839 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRIC FOR BALL PARK LIGHTS, CITY BUILDINGS, SPRINKLER AT PARK, BARTON/ PALM, SIGNAL, AND CIVIC CENTER 2,752 22 19840 SO CA MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC ASSOC RULEBOOKS FOR SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL 80 00 19841 THE SUN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 275 00 19842 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, INC PROGRESS PAYMENT ON STREET STRIPING (LESS 10% RETENTION) 1,633 68 4 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE APRIL 13, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 041389 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF APRIL 13, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 19843 19844 19845 19846 19847 19848 19849 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS UMPIRES FOR SLO-PITCH MARCH 15-31, 1989 $ 221 00 UNOCAL FUEL FOR CITY TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT 97 48 UNIVERSITY QUICK PRINT BUSINESS CARDS, LETTERHEAD, AND PACKET COVER SHEETS 682 38 VISA CSMFO SEMINAR, CPRS CONFERENCE, TAPES, AND RECREATION MEETING 498 34 VISIBLE COMPUTER PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES - 92 83 RICHARD WEEKS PARKS AND RECREATION CONFERENCE 448 96 WEST END UNIFORMS UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL 77 91 PAYROLL FOR MARCH, 1989 88,340 14 TOTAL $237,969 81 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR 5 �f CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 23, 1989 t A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 23, 1989, at 6 01 p m PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Hugh J Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember ABSENT Thomas J Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager John Harper, City Attorney David Sawyer, Community Development Director Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Joe Ki cak, City Engineer None The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Larry Wilson, Praise Fellowship Foursquare Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Grant Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 05 p m Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 10 p m ITEMS TO DELETE None SPECIAL PRESENTATION 2A Mayor Matteson read a Proclamation proclaiming the week of March 27-31, 1989 as "National Community Development Week " B Mayor Matteson presented Library Awards to children who read 75 books each C Mayor Matteson presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Elsie Warren for her involvement as an original staff member of the Grand Terrace Branch of the County Library D Mayor Matteson Presented a Five Year Service Award to City Manager Thomas Schwab CONSENT CALENDAR CC-89-40 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY ABSTAINED), to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar with the removal of Items A, D, F B RATIFY 03/23/89 CRA ACTION C WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON AGENDA E STAFF ATTENDANCE TO THE ANNUAL NATIONAL ROAD & STREET MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE G ATTENDANCE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S INSTITUTE IN MONTEREY, CA ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 3A APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO 032389 Councilmember Pfennighausen requested that Item 19761, payment for the parkland site, be voted on separately Mayor Pro Tem Grant questioned Item P6086, water for Canal/Terrace Pines City Manager Schwab explained that payment was for maintenance of the landscaping of the Gage Canal area in front of the Terrace Pines Apartments The developer will reimburse the City for this bill and all future bills will be paid by the developer until the City forms an assesment district and accepts the maintenance in that area Mayor Pro Tem Grant questioned the purpose of the brass name plates from South Cost Rubber Stamp Company City Manager Schwab replied that the name plates were for the photographs of Councilmembers, in the Council Chambers, stating their name and terms in office Councilmember Singley questioned check number 19734, Copeland & Associates, asking if we are keeping a scrapbook of articles that he is providing for the City City Manager Schwab replied that we are not presently, but we can if Council desires Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 2 CC-89-41 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register 032389 with removal of Check No 19761 CC-89-42 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON, CARRIED 4-1 (Councilmember Pfennighausen voting Noe), to approve Check Number 19761 3D APPROVE 3/09/89 MINUTES CC-89-43 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to approve 3/09/89 Minutes, with stated correction 3F APPROVE DEPUTY CITY CLERK'S ATTENDANCE AT CITY CLERK'S ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL INSTITUTE Mayor Pro Tem Grant inquired as to why the cost was so high City Manager Schwab explained the the cost included all meals and lodging CC-89-44 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Consent Calendar Item F PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Debra Mueller, 22608 La Paix, Grand Terrace, introduced volunteer members of the Crime Busters Advisory Committee, and invited the public to attend the next meeting of Crime Busters on April 26, at 6 30 p m , in the Community Room Larry Halstead, 21894 Vivienda Ave , Grand Terrace, expressed concern regarding two environmental issues The first being graffito in the City, expressly the Vivienda Bridge He read an article from a Neighborhood Watch Newsletter, quoting Det Nash as saying "Graffito is the newsletter of the street " It should be removed as soon as possible The other issue Mr Halstead brought to Council's attention was a matter that was actually in the City of Colton's jurisdiction, that of a pipe extruding plant going in less than a half mile from the Grand Terrace northern border The plant was approved for operation in January of this year The name of the company is Plexco He went to the City of Colton's Planning Dept to review the files on this company, after reviewing the files he noticed that they will be handling toxic materials and hazardous waste He was told that portions of the files were confidential and he couldn't review them All files were incomplete that he reviewed Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 3 He requested that the City Council consider any and all action to bring an injunction against Plexco and the City of Colton until a thorough investigation can be conducted, including an Environmental Impact Report Mayor Matteson requested a copy of Mr Halstead's report Councilmember Pfennighausen stated that Council must view this issue as an emergency and see that appropriate action is taken to stop this project until the necessary reports are filed with our City It was Council's consensus to have the City Attorney look into this City Attorney Harper suggested to Mr Halstead that he contact the District Attorney and the Attorney General and file complaints Mayor Matteson requested staff to obtain a copy of the report and provide Council with a copy Councilmember Pfennighausen wanted assurance that something will be done right away City Attorney Harper stated that he would start working on it, there are a lot of unanswered questions and needed information that he will need to proceed Mayor Pro Tem Grant felt that because of the environmental adverse effect that could happen, he felt an injunction would be the way to go City Attorney Harper replied that there are too many unanswered questions that need to be answered before anything can be done, but he will pursue it as expediously as he can City Attorney Harper suggested other agencies Mr Halstead should contact, as well as the Colton City Council Mayor Matteson suggested that he contact the Sun Newspaper and the Press Enterprise City Attorney Harper asked Mr Halstead to get copies of everything he has to him as quickly as possible Adam Ornelas, 16 Highland Ave , Highgrove, expressed concern regarding debris from the Central City Recycling Plant Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 4 Council directed staff to periodically check that area ORAL REPORTS 5A COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 Parks & Recreation Committee Accept Resignation of Dick Rollins CC-89-45 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the resignation of Mr Dick Rollins with deep regret, and authorize Staff to present Mr Rollins with a special recognition 2 Crime Prevention Committee Council accepted the Minutes of February 13, 1989 5B COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Pfennighausen, asked if the gravel had been removed from under the playground equipment City Manager schwab replied that the gravel has been removed and replaced with sand Councilmember Pfennighausen asked for a status report on the following items Arliss Dr upgrade City Engineer Kicak reported that the Arliss Dr construction will begin the following monday Michigan Ave upgrade City Engineer Kicak reported that the Michigan St plans are ready to go as soon as an injunction is lifted by a property owner Barton Road Project City Engineer Kicak reported that the Barton Road project is basically ready to go and explained that as soon as the final plans and specifications are completed on the conceptual design for the landscaping, they will be incorporated into the project City Engineer Kicak reported that the undergrounding for the individual homes is ready to go as soon as it is coordinated with Edison Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 5 Councilmember Pfennighausen, expressed her concern regarding what affect the street improvements, in front of the Mt Vernon Villas, will have on the Mc Duffy property on the west side of Mt Vernon southerly from the top of the hill coming toward Barton Rd City Engineer Kicak reminded Council that an offer had been made to Dr Mc Duffy that if he would dedicate the property along the frontage of his parcel to the City, that we would install the improvements, and that offer still stands Dr McDuffy has been reminded that the decision needs to be made by him very soon, because we are going to have to do something about it He recommended that the City Council retract the offer and go into condemnation unless something happens, because it has been too long Councilmember Pfennighausen asked if we can give him two weeks and then retract the offer City Engineer Kicak indicated that he could do that if Council desires Councilmember Pfennighausen asked about the status of the snack bar Assistant City Manager Anstine reported that the only thing left to do to the concession stand was painting the exterior He contacted the Little League and Soccer Clubs and they wanted to use it for storage Councilmember Pfennighausen did not agree that it should be used for storage She wants it ready to use as a snack bar City Manager Schwab said at this time it is ready, but no one has expressed a desire to use it He stated he will contact the community groups to find out if/when they want to use it Councilmember Pfennighausen requested a status report on the demolition and clean up at the Garden Home Apartment complex City Manager Schwab reported that the contractor has made a lot of progress and will be done within the contract specification period Councilmember Singley informed Council that he had previously contacted FPPC regarding his position as a Councilmember and budget negotiations as an employee of the Sheriff's Department The Fair Political Practices Commission informed him that a Sheriff's Department employee, who is also a City Council member, may participate in contract negotiations between the Sheriff's Department and the City Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 6 Mayor Pro Tem Grant reported that he attended the March 15th meeting of the Local Agency Formation Commission Mayor Matteson indicated that he would like more calls from the public expressing their views regarding the lighting district in the City of Grand Terrace UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A Approve Barton Road Landscaping Conceptual Design City Manager Schwab reported that RHA has come up with a conceptual design for the landscaping of the Barton Road improvement project Roger Drayer, RHA, 3612 7th Street, Riverside, gave an outline of the conceptual design for the landscaping of Barton Road Council offered suggestions on types of landscaping for the project CC-89-46 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Barton Road Landscaping Conceptual Design 7B Housing & Community Development Block Grant Program Assistant City Manager Anstine reported that the Federal Department of Housing & Community Development had disapproved the HCDBG projects as submitted The reason for disapproval was based upon the determination by HUD, that the City of Grand Terrace has no "pockets of poverty " The only project that was approved was improvements to the Senior/Community Center CC-89-47 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, to make the Senior/Community Center improvements a number one priority Councilmember Pfennighausen expressed concern regarding the safety of children on Michigan Ave and requested that sidewalks for that area become a priority Councilmember Singley suggested that the sidewalks be put in the 1989-90 Budget under Capital Improvements MOTION CC-89-47, CARRIED 5-0 8A Resolution to Increase Planning Commissioners' Stipend by $10 Per Meeting Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 7 CC-89-48 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON, CARRIED 5-0, to increase the Planning Commissioners' stipend by $10 per meeting, not to exceed $70 per month ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8 00 p m , until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held Thursday, April 13, 1989 DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace 1- - Council Minutes - 03/23/89 Page 8 DATE Apr 5, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Apr 13, 1989 SUBJECT CITY MANAGER'S ATTENDANCE AT THE 1989 LEGISLATIVE SEMINAR FUNDING REQUIRED x NO FUNDING REQUIRED Annually, the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) co-sponsors with other agencies a legislation seminar to provide an up-to-date briefing on matters being considered by the State Legislature and the Federal Government concerning local government finance This year the seminar is being held on May 11, 1989, in Sacramento The City Manager is requesting authorization to attend Sufficient funds are available in the travel and meeting account STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND THE CSMFO SEMINAR IN SACRAMENTO ON MAY 12, 1988 TS bt 1989 LEGISLATIVE SEMINAR ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CO -SPONSORED BY CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AUDITORS CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOCIATION COUNTY TREASURERS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS The 1989 Legislative Seminar on Local Government Finance represents the seventeenth consecutive year that this important briefing session has been held Initially conducted by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, the Seminar is now co -sponsored by every major statewide city, county and special district association having a direct interest in local government finance The 1989 Seminar will be held as follows Date Thursday, May 11, 1989 Time 9 30 a m - 3 00 p m (Registration 8 45 - 9 30 a m , Activity Building) Place Activity Building, Exhibit Hall B Sacramento Community Center 14th and "K" Streets Sacramento, California , 1. SEMINAR GOALS AND PARTICIPATION The Legislative Seminar is a one -day program designed to provide a current and factual insight into matters presently being considered by the State Legislature and Federal Government concerning local government finance The Seminar will be conducted at the Community Center across from the State Capitol, and involves legislative officials and others who play an important leadership role in finance -related matters The Seminar is timed to coincide both with the preparation of local agency budgets for the coming fiscal year, and with that point in the legislative process when decisions are most likely to be made Because of its relationship to local government fiscal management, city, county, and special district finance officials, treasurers, and managers are encouraged to attend Registration fees have traditionally been held to a minimum so that other staff members might also have an opportunity to participate in and benefit from this important training session SEMINAR PROGRAM The 1989 Legislative Seminar is designed to provide those in attendance with a factual and up-to-the-minute briefing on matters being considered by the State Legislature and the Federal Government concerning local government finance Overall, the Seminar is timed to coincide with the local budget process and legislative action on finance issues, and will provide those in attendance with a briefing on the following topics - A briefing on federal issues including recent IRS regulations concerning arbitrage and Section 89 and a look at how future Congressional actions may affect local budgets - A comprehensive legislative report covering items currently under consideration by the State Legislature in the areas of city, county, and special district finance - An in-depth review of the proposed State budget and the current State fiscal situation, including an economic forecast - A panel of speakers to consider various facets of the fiscalization of growth Always related, fiscal decisions and land use choices have become even more interwined in the 1980's - A preview and analysis of "Project 90", the proposal sponsored by a private -public coalition to reform Proposition 4, scheduled for the June 1990 ballot Local government finance and management officials will leave the Seminar with a much improved understanding of the current and future fiscal situation, as well as the major issues before the Legislature and the Congress that are likely to affect their respective agencies and programs - 2 - MORNING SESSION 9 30 - 10 30 a m -- Federal Issues -- An Update of IRS Regulations Including Arbitrage and Section 89 and A Look at Current Congressional Issues - Cathie Eitelberg, Assistant Director, Federal Liaison Center, Government Finance Officers Association 10 30 a m - 11 15 a m -- The State Budget and the Current Fiscal STtuation - Elizabeth Hill, Legislative Analyst, State of California (invited) 11 15 a m - 12 00 noon -- Local Government Legislative Report - Larry Naake, Executive Director, County Supervisors Association of California - Jim Harrington, Assistant Director for Legislative/Policy Development, League of California Cities LUNCHEON SESSION 12 00 - 1 30 p m -- A Legislator's Perspective on State and Local Fiscal Issues - Senator John Garamendi, Chair, Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee AFTERNOON SESSION 1 30 - 3 00 p m -- The Fiscalization of Growth, Coordinating Land Use Planninq with Financial Planning - Lyle Defenbaugh, Consultant, Assembly Local Government Committee - Mike Davis, Director of Planning and Development, City of Sacramento - Angus McDonald, Angus McDonald and Associates, Burkeley - Rebecca K Taylor, Director, California Tax Foundation, Sacramento SEMINAR COST AND REGISTRATION Registration will take place from 8 45 - 9 30 a m in the Activity Building of the Sacramento Community Center An advance registration form is attached to this announcement and should be returned by May 1 to the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers, P 0 Box 7005, Lafayette, CA 94549 Checks should be made payable to CSMFO Registration is available at the door on a space available basis Questions concerning Seminar registration should be directed to the League of California Cities, contracted by CSMFO to handle the management of this meeting, at 415/283-2113 - 3 - The cost of the Legislative Seminar is $35 00, which includes registration materials, lunch, and coffee breaks The cost has been kept low to encourage department heads and chief administrators to bring members of their staff who will also benefit from this unique training and educational opportunity Refund Policy Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting may receive a refund of the full registration fee, less a $17 50 processing charge, by submitting a written request to CSMFO, P 0 Box 7005, Lafayette, CA 94549 Requests for refunds must be received by Monday, May 9, 1989 DIRECTIONS -AUTO From on Interstate 5, exit at "J" Street, continue on "J" Street to Community Center (between 13th and 14th) From the South on Highway 99, take Business I 80 West, exit at 16th Street to "K" Street, left onto "K" Street to Community Center (at 14th Street) From the East or West on Business 180, exit at 15th or 16th Street, turn north onto 16th Street to "K" Street, left onto "K" Street to Community Center (at 14th Street) Parking City parking lots located at 13th Street between "I" and "J", "L" Street at 12th, and loth Street between "K" and "L" TRANSPORTATION Travel information (air and auto rental), reservations and ticketing is available through Mutual Benefit Travel Association, the League's travel agency in Sacramento, at 916-929-4488 or 800-223-6282 The following airlines are offering discount fares for this Seminar through MBTA, your travel agent or the airlines AIR FARES American Airlines (Star #S75795) USAir• Convention Fare (AC440Z) Discount airfares are subject to availability, please make your reservations early Skyline Airporter Van Service (444-2222) to/from Senator Hotel Office Building at 12th and "L" Streets takes approximately 30 minutes and costs $7 50 one way It meets all major air carrier arrivals in front of airline terminals For returning flights, pre -reserve by phone, departs from 12th and "L" Streets every half hour FOR OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS Contact the Hyatt Regency Sacramento at Capitol Park, 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, 916/443-1234 by April 20 $90 single/$100 double or twin plus 10% city hotel tax Valet parking $8, self -parking $6 per night - 4 - DATE 4/4/89 C R A ITEM [ ] S T A F F R E P O R T COUNCIL ITEM [ ] MEETING DATE 4 / 13 / 8 9 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT Bond Release - Forest City Grand Terrace - Phase I FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The work required by the conditions of approval for Phase I of Forest City Grand Terrace has been completed The bonds securing these improvements are as follows Bond No Description --------------------------- K 033 14157 Grading - Performance K 033 12409 Water System - Performance K 033 12409 Water System - Labor and Material K 033 12380 Sanitary Sewer System - Performance K 033 12380 Sanitary Sewer System - Labor and Material K 033 15642 Landscaping K 033 12392 Road - Performance K 033 12392 Road - Labor and Material Amount $ 30,000 00 130,000 00 65,000 00 38,000 00 19,000 00 10,000 00 300,000 00 150,000 00 The work secured with the above bonds has been completed In addition, a $3,000 00 deposit for final monuments for the Tract has been made The applicant has requested that the $3,000 00 be transferred from Phase I to Phase II as security deposit for final monumentation of subdivision Staff recommends that City Council 1 Release the above listed bonds 2 Authorize the $3,000 00 cash deposit from Phase I to Phase II for final monumentation of the subdivision CITY 1_1F IaF'AHD f>^F,PALE EMERUM Y OF E PAT 1 III ! , C►-IM W L FTEF 1 I 1 r J i_I I L A T e o l_1 n j 2,, 10r01 Th1F No& z n-I I,Ia- I.;, L K d t 1_1 ordt, r in hIw % irt I h-I a 1 rm3 n .jiN HcAt_t 11, T A r N . (I -Is rio 111ir1_- of 11r-1 rcilibz-r- J T 36a q ON X 1 r1t1 at 1 + tad 1 wre r = 3d y "d at t o ,r rj t'I NILf _ PPL A I•J f tlii t_1 I Q LE't wir 41 E "n L 411a1_I3r n o-_7 LI v 1 1-JI dun! a A I irt1 i ;t_1UdzI G1 IE' , I I f E-LH I 1 r+r+1 ",t_i 11t1-It"1 L.LI,_1_N I Ej OF" ,I1 r NA,_ a III,_It, t_t11 i Ot f 1,-1r11 _uhlmQ i_I_i just � -w a 1 -`I 11,7t t tnrrtl xt = r Cal t 1011_ 101 All l r"opine t i rs M i CI I " t r lIr11= d Ilk t' M rl L I I I II It r 3 F=17 I'IIr11 w 11-ir- r-04i t; W'"_ I of i!Ir W111 I II tr wl 1'h1 illy ;rur1_] 1 - t1- +_11 or Lr l h 4i_ U 1,JI1 ( W. TI Ir1, I,I i 1 1 1 11 r t h 1" 1 1 I ,, r I li,,rir" -I I i 1_ 1_1 4 1 r t_ 1 i _I 1' r r-1 r* t i J 1 11 1 rt I L t" t .- r t �1 it _ t 1 I, I t" +: , r n t- l cl--- t+ i I t 1 Ili-(- 1 1 ], i 1 i -III 11 :t I III t h d I"ck t_111 1+1ol-Ii,hll_I c:IrJ_, t 11 1P- r11 F,, oIIt 1-t trt1U1 Ltl I- t Qf I h1`M r11G 1 Ira iia t MI1111111 A I rL.11J "71_ wf,H,t r_I r_I,I rf -t i1 11Jc I a1 1i1111_J 1-1j1 i II-i 1 r or1. L1 I I J i,r1 E-1 I1_ 1 'I 17 T d J 1 -4 Dz-i 1'I i W 1 m L I I I l p i t I I_ I_Irtll 1 5 t 1 T I Ihr 1, h lt_t Li rqq 0 I i� rrl a l it J 1 +�I t I i I'-1 .4 (I I� i_ I'= -' 1 I I1r 1 7 i I_ I I I J A "t I' 1_ P` a V �_ 11-1 1! �' 7 I i" i_ �I I I• J= t J. L I I J '� I I H }�11 1 t I I , !• r7 1 1 .i r h 1 I- [t I n h r 1' J 1 1 1 1 �. t t._t r 1 r 1 z y= frg w LII,IrF E1 -111 ',1_ i L I ''n i cis f _l.tr I_ � -j _ _1I1_ - i-, 4 Rp r urlrl-1i l l 1 i1 t m L I" L l =11Nd out it r it ico, F 111 W 1L e t r q Ji ntw 11_N Irl7 L ink the R rE d i "n T11�r F i r1 oa 1 L H i i oh 11 - A I_ F yT. hot I I-IY 1- J. F L u i n Ur r 1 9r 3 11t J I w rice r„ Th-11_, r 1 1: i_ 1 1oI I l t i Lt+_ 1+1 L iwrl, L T h'I e nodf rrt n 0 a l l WI will Lot l~ At I I -1 t o 14 I 1 S Q ice r11t=1-r i np wn m1J 1our md it , 10 F . m. L I I 1' r 11 i lol 11J1-F F i WUP> UL AGEJADA UP* HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMITTEE Minutes of the March 7, 1989 Meeting The meeting was called to order at 7 05 PM by Chairman Viola Gratson Those present were Ann Petta, Viola Gratson, Pauline Grant, Irene Mason, Marie SchTudt, and Hannah Laister The Secretary's report was read for the February 6th meeting Irene moved to approve the minutes and Ann seconded Treasurer's report remains the same Jim Singley, Council member, stopped by to introduce himself to the Committee and to explain the sign -in sheet that has been required Also to say that if any of our members have questions to call him at home or at work Members enjoyed having him at our meeting The Co=ttee has reserved the Community Room for May 6th and 7th for the annual art show Flyers have been prepared and were mailed with the sewer bills We will also distribute them around town Irene will get publicity going Safety Fair The Committee has been asked to have a booth This the comr,u ztee voted to do We will sell cake, cookies, coffee, etc Each member will bake This will be Sunday, June 4th Show Case Ron Martin repaired our show case in the lobby The secretary .ill send him a "thank you" note A new display will be prepared as the case is now empty This will be on the early days of the city Viola purchased some display holders for the members to look at and they worked very well She will purchase more Linda Lee Laufer wrote a letter of resignation to the City Council and the Committee We will all miss Linda Lee as she was a very valued member We will ask Linda Lee to help out with the cooking, baking contest when we hold our Country Fair this year as she did such an outstanding job in the past The next meeting will be April 3rd, 1989 The meeting was adjourned at 8 P , motion to adjourn made the Hannah, seconded by Irene Respectfully submitted, �r,� L tJ-,, Hannah Laister, Secretary Y U J t l N _ t rl A S— C. 'is �� 2/ J n ra e i w a TTT \\\ STAFF REPORT DATE 4/5/89 C R A ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM MEETING DATE ;4/ 13/89 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT Planning Commission Recommendation to Adopt Z-89-1 (Zoning Revisions of Residential Districts and Off Street Parking) Negative Declaration and Attached Exhibits FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED�� TO City Council FROM David Sawyer, Community Development Director DATE April 13, 1989 SUBJECT- Staff Report, Z-89-1 APPLICANT. City of Grand Terrace LOCATION Entire City REQUEST Amendments of Chapter 18 12 and repealing Chapters 18 15, 18 18, 18 21 and 18 24 in relation to residential zorung requirements, amending Chapter 18 09 in relation to the City's Zoning Map and amending Chapter 18 60 in relation to the City's off-street parking requirements BACKGROUND. After the completion and adoption of the General Plan, the next step is to bring the City's Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map into conformance with the revised General Plan Tonight's public hearing is the beginning of that process Before your Council at this time is the revision of the Zoning Map inaccordance with the revised Land Use Map of the General Plan and the revision of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 18) regarding the City's Residential Districts and the City's off-street parking regulations On March 6, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed zoning amendment as presented to you as Exhibits "A, B, & C" of Attachment A I , � I �,, :-- - - !, z- �A -��o -,, (eA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and is included for your review as Exhibit D to Attachment "A" DISCUSSION Chapter 18.09 Districts and Map - The proposed changes to the Zoning Map include the removal of the CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) Overlay Zones, the removal of R-R (Residential Agricultural) and A-1 (Limited Agricultural Residential) Districts, the addition of the R1-40 (Very Low Density Residential), R1-20 (Low Density Residential), R1-7 2 (Single Family Residential) and PIT (Public Facilities) Districts and the addition of the AG (Agricultural) Overlay District These changes are illustrated on the proposed Zoning Map included as part of Attachment "A"s Exhibit "A" Chapter 18 12 Residential Districts The proposed changes to Chapter 18 12 (see Attachment Xs Exhibit B) are mostly a reformating of the chapter's text and associated tables A few actual changes are being proposed which include a reduction in the alllowable height of an accessory structure in the R1-7 2 District from twenty (20) feet to eight (8) feet and a change of "Temporary Uses (As approved by the Planning Director)" from a conditionally permitted use to a permitted use The only other change is the addition of a twenty-five percent (25%) density bonus provision for projects which meet the State's requirements for a "Lower" or "Low or Moderate Income" projects This density bonus provision is already in effect as a result of the California Government Code Chapter 4 2 The inclusion of this provision m the City's Code is to bring us into conformity with the State Code which the City is obligated to abide by Chapter 18 60 Off -Street Parking - The proposed changes to Chapter 18 60 are substantial, the existing ordinance (see Attachment C) for the most part, establishes parking regulations by zoning district, not by the actual use proposed It is disjointed due to several past amendments and does not address several important issues related to parking The proposed amendment (see Attachment Xs Exhibit C) adds several items, including an application section, detailed space per use standards, special regulations for drive-thru facilities, bicycle parking and shared use regulations The proposed amendment also contains detailed design standards for the paving, striping, lighting and landscaping of a parking area and an incentive provision for larger combined projects rather than smaller independent projects RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance approving Z-89-1 and its associated Negative Declaration as recommended by the Planning Commission contained therein (See Attachment "A") Respectfully submitted by Q L-6 avid Sawyer, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING AMENDMENT Z-89-1, AMENDING CHAPTER 18 12, AND REPEALING CHAPTERS 18 15, 18 18, 18 21 AND 18 24 IN RELATION TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND AMENDING CHAPTER 18 09 IN RELATION TO THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1860 IN RELATION TO THE CITY'S OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, the City Council approved a revised General Plan on December 8, 1988, and WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Districts shall be revised to conform with the revised General Plan, and WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Amendment, Z-89-1, set out in full in Exhibit B, herein, amends Chapter 18 12 and repeals Chapters 18 15, 18 18, 18 21, 18 24 in relation to residential zoning in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, the proposed the Zoning Amendment, Z-89-1 also amends Chapter 18 09 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code in relation to the City's Zoning Map (Exhibit A), and WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Amendment, Z-89-1 also amends Chapter 18 60 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code in relation to the City's Off- Street Parking Requirements (Exhibit C), and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study has been conducted and a Negative Declaration (Exhibit D) has been prepared, and ATTACHMENT A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on February 21, 1989 and a properly noticed, continued Planning Commission meeting on March 6, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting of March 6, 1989, recommended to the City Council that Z-89-1 as set out in full in the attached Exhibits A through D be approved and adopted, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on April 13, 1989, on Z-89-1, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 The Zoning Ordinance Amendment Z-89-1, amending Chapter 18 12, and repealing Chapters 18 15, 18 18, 18 21, and 18 24 in relation to Residential Zorung and amending Chapter 18 09 in relation to the Zoning Map of the City of Grand Terrace and amending Chapter 18 60 in relation to the City's Off -Street Parking requirements as set out in full in the attached Exhibits A through C are approved and adopted by this City Council SECTION 2 The Negative Declaration, set out in full in attached Exhibit D is approved and adopted by this City Council SECTION 3 Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12 01 AM on the 31st day of its adoption SECTION 4 Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council SECTION 5 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 13th day of April, 1989, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 29th day of May, 1989 ATTEST City Clerk of the City Mayor of the City of Grand of Grand Terrace and of Terrace and of the City the City Council therof Council thereof I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted as a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 13th day of April, 1989 by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney CHAPTER 18 09 DISTRICTS AND MAP Sections 18 09 010 Districts Established 18 09 020 Designation on Map and Adoption of Map 18 09 030 Applicability of Regulations 18 09 040 Boundary Uncertanties Section 18 09 0t0 Distiicts Established The following Zoiung Districts are hereby established R1-40 Very Low Density Residential District R1-20 Low Density Residential District R1-7 2 Single Family Residential District R2 Low Medium Density Residential District R3 Medium Density Residential Distiict AT Adminstrative and Professional Office Dlslrlct C2 General Business District MR Restricted Manufacturing Distiict M2 Industrial District PF Public Facilities District AG _ Agricultural Overlay District FP Floodplain Overlay District Section 18 09 020 Designation on Map and Adoption of Man The designations, locations and boundaries of the districts established are delineated upon the official Zoning Map on file with the Plan -rung Department This map and all notations and information thereon, which may be amended from time to time, are made a part of this title by reference EXHIBIT A Section 18 09 030 Applicability of Regulations The uses described in this title will be allowed and the regulations set out in this title shall apply in the districts established in this chapter Section 18 09 040 Boundary Uncertainties Where uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of any districts shown on the Zoning Map, the following rules shall apply A Where such boundaries are indicated as appzoximately following street and alley lines, such lines shall be construed to be such boundaries B Where an uncertainty exists, the Planning Commission shall determine the location of boundaries C Where a public street or alley is officially vacated of abandoned, the regulations applicable to the parcel to which it reverts shall apply to such vacated or abandoned street or alley 1- .6 - t++t+}++} �InNy� ++}++++++4 + +++fT ti + +F ++++++++t+++ +t+ t t }+++ t Ml �C'r: an EE �sE.. Ei � _ �© ■ �� trt t►�" E ru�i City of Grand Terrace CHAPTER 18 12 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Sections 1812.010 Purpose 18 12 020 Residential Districts 18 12 030 Use Regulations 1812040 Site Development Standards 18 12 050 Off Street Parking 18 12 060 Residential Street Parking 1812070 Signs 18 12 080 Site and Architectural Review Section 18 12 010 Purpose The residential zones contained in this Chapter are intended to carry out the goals and objectives of the Community's General Plan, with respect to residential uses These goals and objectives are to be achieved through the following purposes established for the residential zones 1 To provide for development in accord with the General Plan 2 To promote the most appropriate and efficient use of the land while providing a variety of housing opportunities to the community 3 To promote a compatible relationship between residential, commercial and other types of landuses located in the community 4 To promote the public health, safety, and welfare through encouraging the appropriate type and size of development for the community 5 To manage development with respect to its type, size and location in order to prevent harmful encroachment of disruptive development into the community's residential neighborhoods EXHIBIT B Section 18 12 020 Residential Districts The following districts are designed to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan Each district contains specific landuse regulations and density ranges for development 1 R1-40, Very Low Density Residential District. This district is intended for very low density single family residential use The mimmum lot size is 40,000 square feet with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per gross acre 2 R1-20, Low Density Residential District This district is intended for low density residential use The minimum lot size is 20,000 square feet with a maximum density of two dwelling units per gross acre 3 R1-7 2, Single Family Residential District This district is intended for single family residential use The minimum lot size is 7,200 square feet with a maximum density of five dwelling units per gross acre 4 R2, Low Medium Density Residential District This district is intended for single family residential use and low density multiple family development The minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet with a maximum density of five dwelling units per gross acre 5 R3, Medium Density Residential District This district is intended for medium density multiple family development The minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet with a maximum density of twelve - plus (12+) dwelling units per gross acre Section 18 12 030 Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 18 12 030 shall be allowed 1n one or more of the residential districts as indicated in the columns below each district heading Permitted uses are indicated by the letter "P" while the letter "C" indicates uses which require a conditional use permit Section 18 12 040 Site Development Standards - The site development standards established for each residential district are as shown in Table 18 12 040 Section 18 12 050 Off Street Parking - The provisions of Chapter 18 60 shall apply in determining the number of parking spaces that must be provided for each use located in a residential district Section 18 12 060 Residential Street Parking' The provisions of Chapter 10 16 shall apply in all residential districts Section 18 12 070 Signs The provisions of Chapter 18 72 shall apply in all residential districts TABLE 1.8 12 030 Permitted Uses USES R1-40 R1-20 R1-7.2 R2 R3 k Residential Uses P P P P P Single Family (Detached) Single Family (Attached) (Duplex, Triplex and Fourplex) - - - P P Multiple Family Dwellings - - -' P Manufactured Housing (As permitted per Chap 18 51) - - P - - Mobile Home Park - P - P - P C P C P B Residential Accessory Uses Accessory Structure S(,cond Family Unit (As permitted per Chap 18 54) C C C C C Guest House C C - - - Private Garage P P P P P Private Swimming Pool P P P P P -Prn-at eRczr-eation 1 Home Occupation (As permitted per Chap 5 06) P P P P P Keeping of Cats and Dogs (Maximum of two (2) each) P P P P P Other Accessory Uses (As approved by the Planning Director) P P P P P C Other Uses Churches (Minimum Three (3) acre parcel) C C C C C Schools (Private and parochial) C C C C C CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - TABLE 18 12 030 (CONTINUED) Permitted Uses USES R1-40 R1-20 R17.2 R2 R3 C Other Uses (Cont) P P P P P Public Park and Playground Public Facihties (and Quasi -Public) C C C C C Day Care Center (With six (6) or less children) P P P P P Day Care Center (With seven (7) or more children) C C C C C Residential Care Facility (With six (6) or less patients) P P P P P Residential Cdre Facility (With seven (7) or more patients) C C C C C Utility or Service Facility C C C C C Outdoor Recreation Facility C C C C C D Temporary Uses Temporary Uses (As approved by the Planning Director) P P P P P Temporary Trailers (As approved by the Planning Director)P P P P P TABLE 18 12 040 Site Development Standards DEVELOPMENT ISSUE R1-40 R1-20 R1-7.2 R2 R3 Lot Area (Minimum square feet) 40,000 20,000 7,200 10,000 10,000 Lot Width (Minimum linear feet) Interior Lot 150 100 60 60 60 Corner Lot 150 100 70 70 70 Lot Depth (Minimum linear feet) 200 150 100 100 100 Street Frontage (Minimum linear feet) 50 50 40 40 40 Setbacks (Minimum linear feet) * Front Yard 25 a 25 a 25 a 25 ' 25 1 * Rear Yard 35 a 35 a 20 a 20 a 20 a * Side Yard Interior Lot With Driveway 10 a 10 a 10 a 10 a 10 Without Driveway 10 a 5 a 5 a 5 a 10 a Corner Lot Streetside 15 a 15 a 15 a 15 a 15 ' Not Streelside 10 a 5' S a 5 a 10 ' Density (Allowable dwelling units per acre) 1 1-2 15 1-5 b 1-12 b,` Living Area (Minimum square feet) * Single Family 1,350 1,350 d 1,350 1,350 1,350 * Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex and Multiple Family Studio - - - 800 800 d - One (1) Bedroom - - - 800 d 800 a Two (2) Bedroom - - - 1,000 d 1,W0 d Three (3) Bedroom - - - 1,200 d 1,200 d Height (Maximum linear feet) 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE TABLE 18 12 040 (CONTINUED) Site Development Standards DEVELOPMENT ISSUE R1.40 R1-20 R1-7.2 R2 R3 Lot Coverage (Maximum percent) 30 40 50 60 C 60 f Distance Between Buildings 5 5 5 (Minimum luiear feet)- 20 20 Table 18 12.040 Footnotes a. The following exceptions apply to front, rear and sideyard requirements as noted 1) The minimum side and rearyard setback for a patio cover shall be five (5) feet 2) The muumum rearyard setback for an accessory structure shall be ten (10) feet 3) Slopes exceeding five percent (5%) shall be permitted no closer to a residential structure than a distance equal to the required side and rearyard setbacks 4) In the case of a parcel or tract map, the twentyfive (25) foot front yard setback requirement may range from twentytwo (22) feet to twentyeight (28) feet, with an average of twentyfive (25) feet for all proposed lots b In order to implement the density limits established in the General Plan the following minimum area of land is required for each existing and/or proposed dwelling unit Square Footage of Parcel 0 - 10,000 10,001 - 20,000 20,001 - 30,000 30,001 - 40,000 Continued on next page Dwelling Units ner Sauare Feet of Area R2 R3 1 - 10,000 1 - 10,000 1 - 10,000 1 - 10,000 1 - 10,000 1 - 8,710 1 - 10,000 1 - 5,450 Table 18 12 040 Footnotes b (Continued) Square Footage of Parcel 40,001 - 80,000 80,001 or more Dwelling Units Per Square Feet of Area R2 R3 1 - 10,000 1 - 9,000 c 1) A density bonus of up to twenty percent approved with a conditional use permit or if various off -site improvements which benefit public are included in the project 1 - 4,360 1 - 3,630 (20) may be specific plan the general 2) A density bonus of at least twentyfive percent (2501o) shall be approved if the proposed project meets the requirements of Chapter 42 of the California Government Code regarding "Lower" and "Low or Moderate Income Households" dwelling units d For the purposes of this Section, "living area" shall be defined as "The enclosed area of a residential dwelling unit, excluding porches, patios, carports, garages, storage areas, or auxiliary rooms" e In the R1-7 2 District, accessory structures shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height unless approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board, and in no case shall exceed twenty (20) feet in height In the R1-40, R1-20, R2 and R3 Districts accessory structures shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height f Not more than the permitted percent of the total parcel may be devoted to main and accessory structures, parking areas, driveways and covered patios The remaining percent of the total parcel shall be devoted to open areas such as landscaping, lawn, outdoor recreational facilities, incidental to residential development, including swimming pools, tennis courts, putting greens, uncovered patios and walkways Said open areas shall consist of not less than two hundred (200) square feet of open space per dwelling unit Section 18 12 080 Site and Architectural Review The provisions of Chapter 18 48 shall apply in all residential districts CHAPTER 18 60 OFF-STREET PARKING Sections 18 60 010 Purpose 18 60 020 Application 18 60 030 Parking Regulations 18 60 040 Design Standards 18 60 050 Adjustment by Planning Director Section 18 60 010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish off-street parking regulations to ensure that adequate facilities are provided to meet the needs created by specific landuses, thereby promoting the usefulness of the various uses and protecting the public health and safety Section 18 60 020 Application The regulations of this chapter shall apply in the event any of the following actions occur A Any new construction B Any change of use or new use established C Any addition or enlargement of an existing structure or use D Any change in the occupancy of a structure or manner in which a use is conducted which results in the need for additional parking facilities Section 18 60 030 Parking Regulations The requirements for off-street parking shall be as follows A Residential Uses 1 Single Family Dwellings (Detached) a) Two (2) parking spaces for each residential unit shall be provided on the same parcel of land as the residential unit b) The required spaces shall be located within a garage t x EXHIBIT C 2 Multiple Family Dwellings (Attached) a) Two (2) parking spaces for each residential unit shall be provided b) At least one (1) space shall be located within a garage attached to the main building in which the residential unit is located c) Guest parking shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) space for every four (4) residential units d) Guest parking 1) Shall be identified as "Guest Parking" 2) Shall not be used for the storage of recreational vehicles, boats, trailers or other similar items 3) Shall be located on the same parcel of land as the residential units and shall be within reasonable walking distance of said units 4) May be "Open Spaces" 5) May be located on a private street or in a common parking area B Commercial/Office Uses 1 General commercial and/or office centers comprised of a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross floor area a) One (1) parking space shall be required for every two hundred twenty-five (225) square feet of gross floor area or area devoted to a specific use Note The following uses shall in any case provide the number of parking spaces as required in the following subsection 3, fastfood restaurants, educational facilities, hospitals, motor vehicle sales facilities and theaters 2 General commercial and/or office centers comprised of a minimum of 75,000 square feet of gross floor area a) One (1) parking space shall be required for every two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area or other area devoted to a specific use Note The following uses shall in any case provide the number of parking spaces as required in following subsection 3, fastfood restaurants, educational facilities, hospitals, motor vehicle sales facilities and theaters 3 The following number of parking spaces shall be required for specific commercial/office uses which are not located within a center as described in the above subsections B 1 and B 2 a) Amusement enterprises, commercial recreation and similar uses 1) One (1) parking space for every four (4) persons using or attending the facility b) Automobile washing and cleamng establishments 1) Full -service facilities require one (1) parking space for each employee 2) Self-service facilities require two and one half (2 5) parking spaces for each washing bay c) Barbershops and beauty salons 1) Two (2) parking space for each barberchair or beautician's station d) Banks, savings and loan offices and other financial institutions 1) One (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area e) Bowling alleys and/or billiard halls 1) Five (5) parking spaces for each lane, 2) Two (2) parking spaces for each billiard table f) Churches and other areas of assembly not specified in this chapter 1) One (1) parking space for every four (4) fixed seats, 2) One (1) parking space for every twenty-five (25) square feet of seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats Note Twenty-four (24) linear inches of bench or pew shall be considered a fixed seat g) Delicatessens, sandwich shops, retail bakeries and other establishments for the sale of food and beverages to be consumed either on or off the premises 1) One (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square r 7 feet of gross floor area (includes outdoor seating areas) 2) Fastfood restaurants require one (1) parking space for every seventy-five (75) square feet of gross floor area (includes outdoor seating areas) h) Educational facilities 1) Elementary and junior high schools require two (2) parking spaces for each classroom -1 2) Senior high schools require one (1) parking space for each employee and one (1) parking space for every six (6) students regularly enrolled 3) Colleges, universities and institutions of higher learning require one (1) parking space for each employee and one (1) parking space for every three (3) students regularly enrolled 4) Trade schools, business colleges and commercial schools require one (1) parking space for each employee and one (1) parking space for every three (3) students regularly enrolled 1) Gas stations 1) Three (3) parking spaces, 2) Plus two (2) parking spaces for each service bay j) Health clubs, spas and exercise studios 1) One (1) parking space for every one hundred fifty (150) square feet of gross floor area k) Hospitals 1) One and three quarters (175) parking spaces for each bed 2) Convalescent hospitals, sanitariums and retirement facilities require one (1) parking space for every four (4) beds 1) Motels and hotels 1) One (1) parking space for each guest unit, 2) Two (2) parking spaces for each employee m) Mortuaries and funeral homes 1) One (1) parking space for every twenty-five (25) square feet of gross floor area n) Motor vehicle sales and automotive repair 1) One (1) parking space for every four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area o) Offices 1) General offices require one (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area 2) Medical, dental and veterinary offices/climcs require one (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area p) Residential and child care facilities 1) One (1) parking space for each employee, 2) One (1) parking space for the first six (6) children or patients and one (1) parking space for every four (4) children or patients thereafter q) Restaurants, taverns and other establishments for the sale of food and beverages to be consumed primarily on the premises 1) One (1) parking space for every one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area (includes outdoor seating areas) r) Retail sales 1) One (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area s) Skating rinks (ice or roller) 1) One (1) parking space for every one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area t) Theaters 1) One (1) parking space for every four (4) seats, 2) One (1) parking space for each employee C Manufacturing Uses 1 Warehousing and other facilities for which the primary purpose is the storage of goods a) One (1) parking space for every one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area 2 Manufacturing and other facilities for which the purpose is the processing or assembly of goods - a) One (1) parking space for every five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area 3) Research and development a) One (1) parking space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet D Special Requirements 1 Drive-thru facilities a) Each drive-thru lane shall be separated from the circulation routes necessary for ingress and egress from the property, or access to any parking space b) Each drive-thru lane shall be clearly marked and maintained with directional arrows for the purpose of delineation c) In order to facilitate proper review of a drive-thru facility and the adequacy of a proposed site design, the following information shall be required at the time of submittal for a conditional use permit and/or site and architectural review 1) The nature of the product or service being offered 2) The method by which the order is processed 3) The time required to serve a typical customer 4) The arrival rate of customers 5) The peak demand hours 6) The anticipated vehicular stacking requirements 2 Handicapped spaces a) At least one (1) one parking space or two percent (2%) of the required parking spaces, which ever is greater, shall be designated for use by the handicapped Said parking spaces shall be identified in the manner required by the most current editions of the Uniform Building Code and the California Vehicle Code 3 Loading spaces a) In addition to the number of parking spaces required for a specific use, all commercial and industrial uses shall provide loading spaces as follows 1) One (1) loading space for the first five thousand (5,000) square feet of gross floor area and one (1) loading space for every ten thousand (10,000) square feet of gross floor area thereafter up to forty five thousand (45,000) square feet of gross floor area 2) Each loading space shall be twelve (12) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in depth 3) Loading spaces shall be located in an area to provide easy access to the loading entrance of the use or uses it is to serve Such loading entrances and loading spaces should be located in a manner so as not to interfere with pedestrian and/or vehicular traffic 4 Bicycle parking facilities a) All commercial and office uses may provide bicycle parking facilities in a location convenient to the necessitating use as follows 1) All bicycle parking facilities shall be of a design to allow the bicycle to be secured in an upright position and shall be in a designated location within the parking areas 2) Weatherproofing or facility covering should be used whenever possible 3) The placement and design of all bicycle parking facilities shall be approved by the Planning Department 5 Shared parking a) The Planning Director may allow a certain number of parking spaces to be designated as meeting the requirements of more than one use subject to the following conditions 1) A parking study shall be presented to the Planning Department demonstrating that substantial conflict will not exist between the peak hours of operations of the individual uses proposing to share the parking spaces 2) The number of shared parking spaces shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the required number of parking spaces for either designated use 2) The shared parking spaces shall be located on the same or adjacent parcel as the uses they are to serve and they shall not be located more than two hundred fifty (250) feet from said uses 3) A written agreement shall be executed by all parties concerned assuring the continued availability of the shared parking spaces Section 18 60 040 Design Standards The following design standards are established to provide the minimum specifications for design, construction and maintenance of parking areas A Dimensions 1) Table 18 60 040 with its associated illustrations establishes the minimum dimensional requirements for parking areas in all districts, except in the case of "garage" parking spaces as required by subsection Al for single family dwelling units Such a parking space shall be dimensioned as follows a) A garaged parking space shall be ten (10) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in depth B Paving 1) All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphaltic, concrete, or other permanent, impervious surfacing material so as to prevent mud, dust, loose material, and other nuisances Alternate surface material may be approved by the Planning Commission or Site and Architectural Review Board 2) Concrete wheel stops shall be placed two (2) feet from the front end of the parking space The resulting area between the wheel stop and the front end may be landscaped with a low growing ground cover material This area should not to be included as part of any perimeter landscape area required in subsection E TABLE 18 60 040 Dimensional Standards PARKING SPACE ANGLE DESIGN ITEM 00 45 ° 9p ° A Parking Space Width 9' 12' 9" 9' B Parking Space Depth 22' 20' 7" 19' C Aisle Width * One (1) Way 12' 12' 20' * Two (2) Way 18' 18' 24' D Driveway Width * Residential 18'-26' 18'-26' 18'-26' * Commercial Mt-40) 26'-40, 2,6'-M, E Perimeter Landscape Area Depth 5' S' S' F Parking Bay Width * Single Loaded - One (1) Way 21' 32' 7" 39' - Two (2) Way 27' 38' 7" 43' * Double Loaded - One (1) Way 30' 53' 2" 58' - Two (2) Way 36' 59' 2" 62' G Landscape Planter * Width 5 5' 51 * Area 75' 75' 75' H Tree Well * Width/Depth 4' 4' 4' * Area 16' 16' 16' C Lighting 1) Lighting shall be designed to reflect away from residential districts and public roadways 2) Light standards shall not exceed fifteen feet in height measured from the the finished grade of the parking surface 3) No lighting shall create illumination on an adjacent property which exceeds five (5) footcandles (measured at ground level) D Striping 1) All parking spaces and loading spaces shall be clearly striped and maintained with double (hairpin) lines Each of the lines shall be an equal nine (9) inches from the sideline of the required parking space a) Handicapped parking spaces shall be striped and individually identified inaccordance with the Uniform Building Code and the California Vehicle Code 2) All aisles, fire lanes, maneuvering areas and/or other specified non -parking areas shall be clearly marked and maintained with directional arrows and striping E Landscaping 1) Landscaping shall be required in all parking areas as follows a) A minimum of five percent (5%) of the parking area shall be landscaped b) The required landscaping shall consist of low growing ground cover materials, shrubs not to exceed three (3) feet in height and one (1) fifteen (15) gallon tree for every five (5) parking spaces Once established, the required trees shall be trimmed in a manner to remove branches below the height of six feet from the parking surface c) Each parking area shall provide a perimeter landscape area around the perimeter of the parking area The perimeter landscape area shall be a minimum of five (5) feet in depth d) Each parking bay shall begin and end with a landscape planter Landscape planters shall contain a minimum of seventy (75) square feet of landscape area and the narrowest measurement from side to side shall be at least four (4) feet e) One (1) landscape planter shall be located approximately every ten (10) parking spaces and there shall 1n no case be more than fifteen (15) parking spaces in an uninterrupted row f) The required landscaping trees shall be located at the front end of the parking spaces at a rate of one (1) tree for every five (5) parking spaces h) In the case where two (2) parking bays are adjacent to each other, tree wells shall be located at the front end of the parking spaces at the intervals as required above The tree wells shall contain a minimum of sixteen (16) square feet of landscape area and the narrowest measurement from side to side shall be at least four (4) feet 1) All landscaping areas, including landscape planters, perimeter landscape areas and tree wells shall be fully irrigated by an automatic sprinkler system, shall be separated from the paved parking surface by a six (6) inch raised concrete curb or its equivalent and shall be kept in a clean, neat and healthy condition and the irrigation system in an adequate working order j) All parking areas shall be screened from view from public streets and adjacent less intensive uses by any one or combination of the following 1) Walls Low profile walls, not to exceed three (3) feet in height, which shall consist of stone, brick, decorative block or stuccoed block masonry materials 2) Fences (solid) A solid fence not to exceed three (3) feet in height, which shall consist of wood, or wood and masonry or other similar materials which form an opaque screen 3) Fences (open) An open weave, or wrought iron fence not to exceed three (3) feet in height which is combined with landscape materials to form an opaque screen 4) Landscaping Landscaping materials, when maintained in a manner to create an opaque screen not to exceed three (3) feet in height The materials shall be of a size and variety so as to attain a nummum height of two (2) feet, within eighteen (18) months after installation 5) Berms The mounding of soil not to exceed three (3) feet in height Section 18 60 050 Adjustment By Planning Director The off street parking requirements may be adjusted by the Planning Director in the following instances A A minor relaxation of the requirements of this chapter may be granted by the Planning Director if it is determined that the adjustment is minor in nature, will be of benefit the to the project and will not create a negative impact on existing or potential uses adjacent to or in the vicinity of the project B Requirements in addition to those of this chapter may be required by the Planning Director if it is determined that additional requirements are necessary to avoid a negative impact on existing or potential uses adjacent to or in the vicinity of the project BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tem Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT An amendment to the Zoning Map which includes the removal of the CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) Overlay Zones, the removal of R-R (Residential Agricultural) and A-1 (Limited Agricultural Residential) Districts, the addition of the R1-40 (Very Low Density Residential), R1-20 (Low Density Residential), R1-7 2 (Single Family Residential) and PF (Public Facilities) Districts and the addition of the AG (Agricultural) Overlay District An amendment to Chapter 18 1-2 of the Zoning Ordinance which reformats the chapter's text and associated tables A few actual changes are proposed which include a reduction in the allowable height of an accessory structure in the R1-7 2 District from twenty (20) feet to eight (8) feet and a change of "Temporary Uses (As approved by the Planning Director)" from a conditionally permitted use to a permitted use The only other change is the addition of a twenty-five percent (250) density bonus provision for projects which meet the State's requirements for a "Lower" or "Low or Moderate Income" projects An amendment to Chapter 18 60 of the Zoning Ordinance which adds several items, including an application section, detailed space per use standards, special regulations for drive-thru facilities, bicycle parking, shared use regulations and regulations regarding the storage of recreational vehicles The proposed amendment also contains detailed design standards for the paving, striping, lighting and landscaping of a parking area and an incentive provision for larger combined projects rather than smaller independent proDects APPLICANT: The City of Grand Terrace Continued EXHIBIT D 22795 BARTON ROAD 9 GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tem Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMASJ SCHWAB City Manager LOCATION• The entire City FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment David Sawyer, ' Date Community Develo ment Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1 Name of P,oponent City of Grand Ferrace 2 Addr e5s irI Phone Number of Pr oporrent City of Grand -rcrr ace 2279S Bar ,on Road, Grand i erracc, CA 9232LI _5295 Atlentron David Sawyer , Planning Director 3 Date of E-vir orirnental Assessment Q� l LI Agcnc.y cluirrny Assessment C.ily of C r ai)cl_� err rice 5 IName of oposal, if applicable _701-A(ja-� _1�2— a r, Location Proposal 1E � r li Environmental ,,rpacts (E/planatrons � all "yes" and "maybe" answers cite provided orr attached sheep 1 Yes mavbe No 1 Earth 1'irli the Proposal result in a Uns able earth conditions or in cha lees in geologic substructur(3-s? b Disrc-)tions, displacements, compac- ✓ tron or overcovering of the soil' c Subs,antial change in topography or grou id surface relief features' CI l he destruction covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features' ' e Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? I/ 2 3 Yes Maybe No f Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazar cls such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, gi ound failuf e, or similar hazar ds7 Air Will the proposal result in a Substantial air emissions or deterior- / ation of ambient air quality? V h The creation of objectionable odor 57 ✓ c Alter anion of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in clinip te, whether locally or f egionally7 — _✓ Water Will the proposal result rri a Substantial changes in currents, of the course or direction of water movements, / in eitncf marine or fresh waters' ✓ b Substantial changes in absoi ption i gates, drainage patterns, or the i ate and amount of surface i unoff' i✓ c Altei ations to the cour ,e or flow of flood waters' t✓ d Change in the amount of surface waiter in any water body? e Discharge into surface watei s, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or- tur bidity7 f Alteration of the direction of r gate of flow of ground waters' 1✓ Yes Maybe No g Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h Substantial i eduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies' ✓ i Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? ri Piant Lite Will the proposal result in e Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shi ups, grass, ci ops, and aquatic plant-,)' 1✓ J Reduction of the numbers of E<)y unique, mire, or endangei ed species of plants' c Introouction of new species o, plants into an area of native vegetation, or in e barrier to the normal replenish- / men[ of existing species? V _1 Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ✓ 5 nimal Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep tiles, fish and shellfish, henthic organisms or insects)? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species ol' animals? ✓ c Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? AI 7 t 8 9 10 1_1 Yes Maybe No Noise Will the proposal result in a Increases in existing noise levels? V" b CxDOsur e of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare Will the proposal produce sulDstan-ial new light or glare? ✓ Land Use Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the pi event or / planned iand use or an areal Natural Resources Will the proposal result ]- a Su.Dstantial incr ease in the rate of use / of 4ny natur dl r esources? ^_ b Su stantial depletion of any non- ✓ re-e-- able natural resourccl Risk o,' Jpset Will the pi opos,al involve a A isk of an e> plosion of the release of -iazai dous suostances (including, bL-- not 11MILed to, oil, pesticides, cra,iicals or r acaiation) in the event / of �n accident or upset conditions' b Pcssible interference with an emei q- ercy response plan or an emergency 7 ev2cuation plan Populat.on Will the proposal alter the location, disti ibution dcnsity, or growth rate of .he human population or an areal �✓ Housing Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional / housing' V Transportation/Cir culation Will the pro - pi oposal result in a Generation of substantial additional vehicular movements ✓ M 15 M Yes Maybe No b Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? ✓ d Altet ations to present pattorn,:, of circulation or movement of peoiDle and/or goods? Lz_ e Alter ations to water hor tic, i ail or air ttaffi(.7 V f Incr ease in traffic hazar ds to motor vehicles, hicycllsts or pede,)trians7 l✓ Public Set vices Will the pr oposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altar ed governmental set vices in any of the following areas a fire protection' �Z I-) Police protection' C Schools I ✓ d Parks or other rect eational faci- hties' e Maintenance of (Dul-)tic faC111t1CS, including roads' f Other governmental services? Energy Will the proposal result in a Use of substantial amotints of fuel / or energy? b Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of enet yy, or r (,- quire the development of new sources / of enet gy? Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities a Power or natural gas? ✓ 17 1& 19 20 ' Yes Maybe No b Communications systems? I/ c Water' d Sewer or septic tanks? e Storm water drarnage7 f Solid waste and disposal? Human health WIII the proposal result In a Creation of any health haiai d or potential health hazard (CXCluding mental heal th ) ? 11/1' b E posui c of people to potential health haiar cis' Aesthetics WIII the h-)r oposal f exult In the olDstr uCtlon Of any SCell1C vista Of vleW open to the puDIIC, C,I will the pr oposGi r c'sult In the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public /few? I✓ Recreation WIII the proposal result In an ImpacL upon the quality of quantity of existing recreational 0pp0r tunities' Cultural Resour ces a Will the proposal r esult in the alter ation of or the clestructlon of a prehistoric of historic at chaeo- logical slte7 b WIII the proposal result In adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or hlstor Ic huilding, structure, or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unlClue ethnic cultural values? Yes Maybe No d Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact areal r� 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause r a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining IeVeIS, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califot nra history or pi ehistory� V I-) Does the project have the potential to acrieve shot t-term, to the dis- advantage of lone -lean, envrron- men�al goals? (A short-term impact Oil the environment is one which oc- cur , in a relatively bt ref, definitive pet rod of time while: long-terrn impacts will endure well into the future ) I/ f� c Does tl e project have trniDacts which are individually limited, but cumu- lati\ ciy constderable7 fA pr oject's impact on two or more separ ate r esour ces may be relatively small , but whet e the effect of the Dotal of those impacts on the environment is significant ) d Does the project have envir onmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on hurnan beings, either directly or rndir ectly7 �/ 0 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the pi oposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the FnAigat ion measures described on attached sheets have peen added to the project A NFGATIVE DKI-ANAL ION WILL 131- PREPARED I find the pi oposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envii onmenl and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is equired a -- 2I ` )ate s David Sawyer Planning Orr-cc,io, rgna lur e / For City of Grand Ter race III DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 8 In certain areas the landuses tijill change from either residential or industrial to commercial and in other areas will change from commercial to industrial in accordance with the recently revised General Plan These changes were reviewed and mitigated in the �4aster Environmental Analysis for GP-87-4 18 60 010 t business, religious or uses required by the city for a specified period of time A The owner of the property or authorized representa- tive of the use requiring temporary facilities shall submit a letter to the planning director setting forth in detail the location of the mobile home, the length of time such use will be required, together with a statement of future plans which shall eliminate the necessity for a temporary mobile home B The temporary mobile home installation shall meet all requirements of the planning director, the building and safety director and the county environmental health depart- ment C Application shall be made to the planning director for a one-year extension thirty days prior to the expiration of the use (Ord 57 §2 (8 140) , 1982) Chapter 18 60 OFF-STREET PARKING Sections 18 60 010 Purpose 18 60 020 Space defined 18 60 030 Residential single-family dwellings 18 60 040 Residential multifamily dwellings 18 60 050 PUD district 18 60 060 Commercial and industrial uses 18 60 070 Ad]ustment of gross floor area 18 60 080 Open-air parking 18 60 090 Multiple uses on premises 18 60 100 Adjustment by planning director 18 60 110 Joint use of parking 18.60 120 Senior citizen housing 18.60 130 Handicapped parking 18.60 140 Dimensions 18 60 150 Design. 18 60 160 Illumination 18 60 170 Striping and directional arrows 18 60 180 Loading space requirements 18 60 190 Landscaping --Requirements 18e60 200 Landscaping --Maintenance 18 60 210 Guidelines by planning director 18 60 010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to set forth the off-street parking requirements for the vari- ous land uses (Ord 57 §2(19 010), 1982) 558 18 60 020--18 60 050 18 60 020 Space defined As used in this chapter, "space" means a single automobile parking space with minimum clear dimensions and aisle width as indicated below Stall Space Parking Angle/Aisle Width Width Length Parking Angle Aisle Width (feet) (teet) (degrees) (feet) 9 0 19 0 30 12 45 1A 60 17 - 90 2e (Ord 57 §2(19 060(A)), 1982) 18 60 030 Residential single-family dwellings The provisions for off-street parking in the R-R, R-1 and z-1 districts are two parking spaces for each residence mall be provided on the same parcel of land as the residence Parking spaces shall be not less than ten feet Tilde a,c. twenty feet in length, and shall be in a garage (Ora ±03 §1, 1986 Ord 57 §2(19 020), 1982) 18 60 040 Residential multifamily dwellings Tne pro- visions for off-street parking in the R-2 and R-3 disc=-cts are two parking spaces for each dwelling unit A At least one parking space shall be a single car enclosed garage attached to the main building in whicn the residential unit is located B Any parking space not enclosed shall be a mip_mum of nine feet in width and nineteen feet in length ana S-all be permanently maintained for the required parking C Guest parking shall be required and shall oe _n addtion to the two parking spaces required per dwelling unit It need not be enclosed, and shall be identifiec as guest parking The minimum number of guest spaces %nit-_n the pro3ect, either on a private street in the develop-ent or in common parking areas, shall be provided at a rat-o of one space per four dwelling units D All parking spaces shall be within a reasonable distance from the units which they serve as determined oy the planning commission at the time of the site plan a-ao architectural review approval E Guest parking areas shall not be used for boats, campers or other recreation vehicles (Ord 100 §§l, 2, 3, 1986, Ord 57 §2(19 030), 1982) 18 60 050 PUD district The parking in the PUD district are dwelling unit shall be provided street or in common parking areas, provisions for oaf -street two parking spaces pe-- Guest parking, eitne~ on - shall be pro'., ded at a 559 (Grand Terrace a/87) ratio of one space per four dwelling units (Ord 57 52(19- 040), 1982) 18 60 060 Commercial and industrial uses A The provisions for off-street parking in the AP, C-2, M-R and CPD districts unless specific uses requiring greater or per- mitting a lesser amount are 1 AP one space per two hundred square feet of gross floor area, a minimum of four parking spaces shall be provided, 2 C-2 one space per two hundred square feet of �- gross floor area plus one space per employee, 3 M-R one space for each employee on the largest shift or one parking space per one thousand square feet of floor area, whichever is greater, and one parking space for each vehicle operated or kept in connection with the use, 4 CPD Four spaces per one thousand square feet of gross floor area B Off-street parking for the following AP and C-2 uses 1 Amusement enterprises, commercial recreation and similar uses one parking space for each four persons using or attending the facility, 2 Automobile sales, recreational vehicles, nurser- ies and similar uses not entirely enclosed one parking space for each two thousand square feet of open area delroted r to display and sales, 3 Churches one parking space for each four fined seats or for every twenty-five square feet of seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats Twenty-four linear inches of bench or pew shall be consid- ered as a fixed seat, 4 Hospitals one parking space for each four pa- tient beds and one parking space for each staff member and employee on the largest shift, 5 Medical offices, clinics, veterinary hospitals five spaces for each doctor or dentist, 6 Restaurants, nightclubs and other similar places one parking space for each three seats and for ev- ery fifty square feet of floor area where seats may be placed A minimum of ten parking spaces shall be provided, 7 Skating rinks one parking space for each three fixed seats and for each twenty square feet of seating area where there are no fixed seats Twenty-four linear inches of bench shall be considered a fixed seat One parking space for each two hundred fifty square feet of skating area, 8 Theaters, auditoriums and similar places of pub- lic assembly one parking space for each four fined seals and for every twenty-four square feet of seating area where there are no fixed seats (Ord 57 52(19 050), 1982) (Grand Terrace 4/87) 560 18 60 070 18 60 070 Adjustment of gross floor area The plan- ning commission may approve the use of adjusted gross floor area as a basis for the determination of the required par- ing in those instances where a proposed building design al- locates space to uses (such as elevators, foyers and 560-1 (Grand Terrace 4187) R 18 60 080--18.60.130 i indivisible corridors) which do not contribute, as a practical matter, to building occupancy and where, in the opinion of the planning commission, the failure to calculate required parking on the adjusted gross floor area would result in an excessive number of parking spaces (Ord 57 52 (19 060 (part) ) , 1982) 18 60 080 Open-air parking Where a garage is not specifically required, open-air parking spaces are permit- ted (Ord 57 §2 (19 060 (B)) , 1982) 18 60 090 Multiple uses on premises Where there is more than one type of use, parking requirements shall be the sum total of the individual types of uses The planning commission may waive this requirement if it finds that the parking requirements of the different uses do not overlap (Ord 57 §2 (19 060 (C) ) , 1982) 18 60 100 Adjustment by planning director Automobile parking requirements prescribed by this chapter may be ad- justed by the director of planning in the following in- stances when adjustment will not create undue impact on existing or potential uses adjoining the site or in the gen- eral vicinity (Ord 57 52 (19 070 (A)) , 1982) 18 60 110 Joint use of parking For any site with s multiple uses, or for adjoining sites, where the application of this chapter requires a total of thirty or rpore spaces, the total number of spaces initially required by application of the schedule may be reduced by not more than twenty per- cent where, in the judgment of the director of planning, the joint facility will serve all existing, proposed and poten- tial uses as effectively and conveniently as would separate parking facilities for each use or site (Ord 57 §2(19- 070 (B) ) , 1982) 18 60 120 Senior citizen housing For senior citizen housing, the total number of spaces required may be reduced by fifty percent or more, when in the judgment of the plan- ning director such reduction will be commensurate with the reduced parking demand created by the housing facility (Ord 57 52(19 080), 1982) 18 60 130 Handicapped parking Parking spaces pursu- ant to the design requirements of the handicapped shall be reserved for properly identified automobiles in each parking facility according to the following 561 18 60 140--18 60 170 Total Spaces Required 1--50 51--100 101 or more (Ord 57 §2 (19 090) , 1982) 18 60 140 Dimensions Minimum Number of Handicapped Spaces Required 1 2 3 In the R-2, R-3, AP, C-2, M-R, M-2 and PUD districts A Each parking space shall be not less than nine feet wide by nineteen feet long, with adequate provisions for ingress and egress B One-way access drives leading to aisles within a parking area shall be a minimum width of twelve feet C Where two-way traffic is desired, aisle widths and maneuvering areas shall be a minimum width of twenty-four feet (Ord 57 §2 (19 100 (part) , (A, B, C)) , 1982) 18 60 150 Design In the R-2, R-3, AP, C-2, M-R, M-2 and PUD districts A The parking area shall be designed so that a car entering the parking area shall not be required to enter a street to move from one location to any other location with- in the parking area or premises B Parking and maneuvering areas shall be so arranged that any vehicle entering a vehicular right-of-way can do so traveling in a forward direction C Where curbs and gutters do not exist and where ve- hicular access to the private property is not restricted by barriers, head -in parking which would necessitate full frontage access to the street or highway shall not be per- mitted D All off-street parking facilities shall be desig- nated to limit access to the private property from streets and highways to a minimum number of standard commercial driveways per the city's specifications (Ord 57 §2 (19 100 (part) , (D--G)) , 1982) 18 60 160 Illumination In the R-2, R-3, AP, C-2, M-R, M-2 and PUD districts, all lights provided to illumi- nate such parking areas shall be arranged to reflect the light away from ad]oining residential premises and public transportation (Ord 57 §2 (19 100 (part) , (H) ) , 1982) 18 60.170 Striping and directional arrows In the R-2, R-3, AP, C-2, M-R, M-2 and PUD districts, individual parking shalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained Arrows painted on paving shall indicate direc- tion of traffic flow (Ord 57 §2 (19 100 ( (part) , (I)) , 1982) 562 18 60 180--18 60 200' 18 60 180 Loading space requirements Every hospital, industrial and commercial building, where appropriate, shall have and maintain off-street loading as follows A Required loading spaces shall be twenty feet long, twelve feet wide and have a vertical clearance of fourteen feet B One loading space shall be provided per each five thousand square feet of building floor area, not more than four such spaces per use (Ord 57 §2(19 110), 1982) 18 60 190 Landscaping --Requirements Landscaping con- sisting of trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover or any combi- nation thereof shall be installed and maintained in commer- cial and industrial districts according to the following standards and those of Section 18 60 200 A Boundary landscaping shall be provided in the park- ing area abutting public streets except for the area re- quired for street openings five feet in widtn B Internal landscaping in addition to that required in subsection A of this section and equal to at least five percent of the parking area, including drive%,ays, is re- quired and shall be located in the area devoted to parking C Any landscaped area shall be separated from any adjacent vehicular area by'a wall or curb at least six inch- es higher than the adjacent vehicular area D The height of boundary and interior landscaping shall be limited to a height not to exceed three feet or, in the case of trees, no branch shall be below six feet, when within fifteen feet of the point of intersection of 1 A vehicular trafficway or driveway and a street, 2 A vehicular trafficway or driveway and a side- walk, 3 Two or more vehicular trafficways, or driveways, or streets E Landscaping shall be equally distributed throughout the parking area F Irrigation systems shall be kept in working condi- tion Adjustments, replacements, repair and cleaning shall be a part of regular maintenance G All landscaping shall be protected with concrete curbs or other acceptable barriers (Ord 57 52(19 120 (part), A--D, G, H, I)), 1982) 18 60 200 Landscaping --Maintenance The following standards apply to landscaping required by Section 18 60- 190 A Permanent watering facilities shall be provided for all landscaped area B Required landscaping shall be maintained in a neat, clean and healthy condition This includes pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, 563 18 60 210--18 63 020 replacement of plants where necessary, and the regular wa- tering of all plant material C Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly All planting areas are to be kept free of weeds and debris D All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and grow- ing condition Fertilization, cultivation and tree pruning shall be a part of regular maintenance (Ord 57 §2(19 120 (E, F, J, K) , 1982) 18 60 210 Guidelines by planning director Additional guidelines for parking facility design, internal layout, acceptable turning radii and pavement slope, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and other design features may be applied by the director of planning when deemed appropriate (Ord 57 52 (19 120W), 1982) Chapter 18 63 NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS Sections 18 63 010 Nonconforming use of land 18 63 020 Nonconforming use of buildings 18 63 030 Nonconforming buildings 18 63 040 Buildings under construction 18 63 010 Nonconforming use of land The lawful use of land existing at the time of the adoption of the ordi- nance codified in this title, although such use does not conform to the regulations specified in this title for the district in which such land is located, may be continued, provided, that no such use shall be enlarged or increased, nor be extended to occupy a greater area than that occupied by such use at the time of the adoption of the ordinance codified in this title, and when any such use ceases the subsequent use of such land shall be in conformity to the regulations specified by this title for the district in which such land is located (Ord 57 §2(20 010), 1982) 18 63 020 Nonconforming use of buildings A The lawful use of a building existing at the time of the adop- tion of the ordinance codified in this title may be con- tinued, although such use does not conform to the regula- tions specified for the district in which the building is located B The nonconforming use of a portion of a building may be extended throughout the building, provided, that in each case a use permit shall first be obtained 564 d C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT S T A F F R E P O R T DATE 4/5/89 COUNCIL ITEM VX) MEETING DATE 4/13/89 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision SA-88-17 (California Spirits) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DISCUSSION• On November 21, 1988, the Planning Commission considered an application by California Spirits to construct an 8,450 square foot commercial structure on the property located at 22125 Barton Road At that time the application included a variance to the City's parking code The Planning Commission denied the variance based on the inability to make the require findings and subsequently continued the site and architectural review portion of the application upon request of the applicant On February 21, 1989, the applicant returned to the Planning Commission for site and architectural review of a revised project which did not require a variance At that time the Site and Architectural Review Board denied the application based on nonconformity with the City's General Plan The applicant has since appealed the Site and Architectural Review Board's decision to your Council (Attachment A) and is scheduled for your consideration at this time Included with this report for your information are the Planning Commission's staff reports heard at the Planning Commission Meetings of November 21, 1988 (Attachment B) and February 21, 1989 (Attachment D), and the Minutes for each of those meetings (Attachments C and E) Recently, The City Council authorized staff to send out Request For Proposals for the preparation of a Specific Plan for Barton Road This Plan will assist in the implementation of the following General Plan Objective, and Implementation Policy Ob-lective "Prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern It is the intent of the General Plan that new commercial uses be carefully monitored New commercial uses should relate to existing development Isolated commercial projects as well as conversion of residential units to commercial use should be limited and prevented wherever possible." P. VI-9. Implementation Policy "Commercial areas along Barton Road shall be designated for special study and methods to prevent "strip -commercial" type development investigated, This will require financial and legal cooperation between local merchants, land owners, and the City " P VI-9 The Request for Proposals have been sent out to consulting firms and their proposals are due in the Planning Department on April 7, 1989 Public hearings are anticipated to begin during the upcoming summer months The Specific Plan is to be a comprehensive development plan for the Barton Road commercial corridor It will contain specific landuse regulations as well as architectural and site development standards The intent of the plan will be to create a cohesive and interrelated development pattern rather than the "strip development" type of landuse pattern which occurs when individual owners of small or narrow lots develop independently of each other along a commercial street The proposed project is located on one of the key intersections within the specific plan's study area It is to be a single 6,000 sq ft structure oriented toward Michigan Street The location of this structure is such that the future site design and landuse opportunities for this important corner will be severely limited The adjoining properties which make up the balance of this corner, are all owned by the same person who has indicated a desire to redevelop his properties once the specific plan is completed The location and design of the proposed structure prohibits a co- ordinated and inter -related development of this and the adjacent properties As a result, the proposed pro3ect clearly meets the definition of a "strip development" project "Strip development" Commercial or office development, which is usually one store in depth, faces on a major street and is developed independent of adjacent properties Consequently, the proposed project is not inconformance with the above referenced objective and implementation policy of the General Plan and will in fact be detrimental to the successful implementation of the General Plan RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Department recommends the City Council deny the applicant's appeal, thereby upholding the Site and Architectural Review Board denial of SA-88-17 based on the following findings 1 The architectural design, location and configuration of the project as proposed will not be visually harmonious with surrounding sites and structures This is in conflict with Section 18 48 030(C) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 2 The architectural design, location and configuration of the project as proposed prohibits a harmonious transition between this and adjacent landuses to the north and to the west This is in conflict with Section 18 48 030(E) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 3 The architectural design, location and configuration of the project as proposed will be detrimental to both public and private investments in the community by limiting adjacent site development opportunities and jeopardizing the success of the City's Barton Road Specific Plan currently under preparation This is in conflict with Section 18 48 030(D) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 4 The architectural design, location and configuration of the project as proposed is detrimental to the character of the zone by not adequately considering other existing or contemplated uses of adjacent properties and in the general area as explained in the staff report This is in conflict with Section 18 48 060(A & B) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 5 The architectural design, location and configuration of the project as proposed is inconsistent with the City's General Plan, specifically regarding the following Objective and Implementation Policy, Objective "Prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern It is the intent of the General Plan that new commercial uses be carefully monitored New commercial uses should relate to existing development Isolated commercial projects as well as conversion of residential units to commercial use should be limited and prevented wherever possible 11 P VI-9 Implementation Policy "Commercial areas along Barton Road shall be designated for special study and methods to prevent "strip -commercial" type development investigated; This will require financial and legal cooperation between local merchants, land owners, and the City " P VI-9 This is in conflict with Section 18 48 030(A) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Respectfully Submitted by avid Sawyer, Com*nity Development Director f Haden Architects, A.I.A. March 1, 1989 DAVID SAWYER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Re SA-88-17 Dear Mr Sawyer, MAR 0 21989 506 NORTH EUREKA STREET REDLANDS, CALIF 92374 714 798 2327 Please accept this letter as notification to appeal the finding of the Planning Commission (Site and Architectural Review Board), denying our application for a commercial re- tail center to be located at 22125 Barton road, Grand Terrace, California. We would like the City Council to review our application. Please inform us of the date of the appeal hearing Thank you. RJH.fc cc Byron Matteson California Spirits, Inc Respectfully, Richard J. Hickey ATTAr.HMFNT A FROM. DATE• SUBJECT APPLICANT LOCATION Planning Commission BYRON R MATfESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tem Council Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager David Sawyer, Community Development Director November 7, 1988 - Continued to November 21, 1988 Staff Report, V-88-2 and SA-88-17 Haden Architects 22125 Barton Road ZONING AND LAND USE PROPERTY GP ZONING LAND USE Subject Property GC C-2 Vacant To the North PUB PUB Grand Terrace Elementary School To the South GC C-2 Mobile Home Park To the East GC C-2 Beauty Parlor To the West GC C-2 Gasoline Station BACKGROUND AND PLANNING ISSUES The subject property contains 29,440 square feet and is currently vacant It is located on the south side of Barton Road, just east of Michigan There are two points of access to the site, one from Barton Road and one from Michigan Street The access from Michigan Street is by a long driveway that connects to the main parcel This driveway is 33 feet wide and 180 feet long and comprises 5,940 square feet or 20 percent of the parcel The driveway is wide enough to provide for one row of parallel parking and two-way traffic (see Attachment B) The Applicant is proposing to construct a commercial center of 8,450 square feet in a C-2 zone The proposed building will be oriented eastward The Applicant proposes to separate the building into two or three retail units ATTACHMENT B 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 The required parking in a C-2 zone is 1 space per each 200 square feet of building In addition, employee parking must be provided at the rate of 1 space per employee on the largest shift The required parking under the Municipal Code would be 50 spaces (42 customer and 8 employees spaces) In addition, at least one loading space must be provided The Applicant's plans indicate that he would like to provide a total of 36 stalls, which includes one handicapped No loading space is provided VARIANCE The Applicant is requesting a variance on the number of parking spaces as required under Section 18 60 070 of the Municipal Code (see Attachment C) This would be a variance of 14 spaces or 38 percent Discussion In accordance with State law and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code certain findings must be made before a variance may be granted The Applicant has responded to the findings on his Application (Attachment D) The findings that must be made are listed below along with Planning Department analysis 1 Is the subject property deprived of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification due to special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings? No Although the lot has an odd shape it is not felt that this shape hinders the development of the property In fact, access from two major streets could be viewed as a benefit The long driveway is wide enough to provide a parking area and two way access, therefore it is not undevelopable or useless to the project 2 Is the proposed variance consistent with the latest adopted General Plan? Yes, the property has a General Plan designation of General Commercial The proposed project is for a commercial center The variance requested is for a zoning code regulation regarding parking and does not effect land uses permitted in the General Plan 3 Are all land uses and activities that this variance allows in conformity with the regulations specified for the district in which the subject property is located? Yes The property is zoned C-2 which allows for general commercial activity The use proposed is for a commercial center which is a permitted use in this zone The variance is for parking, not for any land use or activity 4 Can the proposed variance be approved without constituting a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification? No All C-2 zoned properties in the City are required to comply with the 1 space per 200 square feet requirement plus loading spaces and employee parking In addition, a special privilege would be granted because it does not meet finding Number 1, above, which is required by State and Local law 5 Will conditions necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions be made a part of the variance approval? No The staff is recommending for a denial of this Variance SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Plannina Issues This retail center is comprised of one building, and with its architecture and design can be referred to as a "strip type center" The proposed General Plan for the City of Grand Terrace states that Barton Road is of special concern to the City That prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a maDor concern and that area shall be designated for a special study to determine methods to prevent the "strip commercial" type of development Architecture The Applicant has submitted colored elevations which illustrate that the structure will have a terra cota spanish the roof, light tan stucco below the roof areas and on the pillars, dark tan split faced block walls with teal blue accent trim The north elevation features pillars that will add interest to the side of the building facing Barton Road A door will give loading access for one of the suites The west elevation, which faces the parking area is mainly composed of large floor to ceiling windows The south elevation, not shown on the plans, is flat with a door for loading access for one of the suites Landscaping: The landscaping to parking ratio, required in the Municipal Code has been met by the Applicant The Applicant is proposing to primarily use ground cover, Cupaniopsis Anacardioiodes trees and one type of shrub Raphiolepis Indica in the parking area The landscaping on Barton Road proposed by the Applicant is lawn and Raphiolepis Indica shrubs Parking. The Applicant has provided 35 standard parking spaces with one handicapped space No loading space has been provided The Grand Terrace Municipal Code requires a total of 50 spaces for the square footage proposed and employees Since two loading areas are indicated on the plans at opposite areas of the building two 12 X 20 loading spaces should be provided, positioned near the loading areas on the north and south ends of the parking lot REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS The following comments were received on this project from our reviewing agencies 1 Memorandum from Riverside Highland Water Company, dated October 21, 1988 (Attachment E), 2 Memorandum from Forestry and Fire Warden Department dated October 21, 1988 (Attachment F), 3 Memorandum from Colton Unified School District dated October 24, 1988 (Attachment G), 4 Memorandum from the Department of Transportation, State of California (CALTRANS) dated October 21, 1988 (Attachment H), and 5 Memorandum from City Engineer dated November 16, 1988 (Attachment I) PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION• Variance• The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution denying V-88-2 on the basis that all of the required findings were unable to be met according to State and local laws (see Attachment A) and Architectural Review The Planning Department recommends denial of SA-88-17 based on the following 1 Inadequate parking under the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, and 2 That this proposed center is a "strip commercial " development The General Plan for the City of Grand Terrace states that Barton Road is of special concern to the City That prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern and that area shall be designated for a special study to determine methods to prevent the "strip commercial" type of development Respectfully Submitted David Sawyer Community Developmen Director RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPROVAL OF V-88-2 WHEREAS, the Applicant, Haden Architects, Inc , has applied for approval of V-88-2, which is a proposed variance from Section 18 60 070 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code in relation to number of parking spaces required in a C-2 zone, and, WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 21, 1988, regarding this application, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made the following responses to findings required by State law and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 1 Is the subject property deprived of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification due to special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings? No Although the lot has an odd shape it is not felt that this shape hinders the development of the property In fact, access from two major streets could be viewed as a benefit The long driveway is wide enough to provide a parking area and two way access, therefore it is not undevelopable or useless to the project 2 Is the proposed variance consistent with the latest adopted General Plan? Yes, the property has a General Plan designation of General Commercial The proposed project is for a commercial center The variance requested is for a zoning code regulation regarding parking and does not effect land uses permitted in the General Plan 3 Are all land uses and activities that this variance allows in conformity with the regulations specified for the district in which the subject property is located' PC MTG 11/21/88 ATTACHMENT A Yes The property is zoned C-2 which allows for general commercial activity The use proposed is for a commercial center which is a permitted use in this zone. The variance is for parking, not for any land use or activity 4 Can the proposed variance be approved without constituting a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification? No All C-2 zoned properties in the City are required to comply with the 1 space per 200 square feet requirement plus loading spaces and employee parking In addition, a special privilege would be granted because it does not meet finding Number 1, above, which is required by State and Local law 5 Will conditions necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions be made a part of the variance approval? No No conditions are necessary as a result of the denial of the variance NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that pursuant to the findings above, V-88-2 is hereby denied PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 21st day of November, 1988 by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN ATTEST Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Stanley Hargrave, Chairperson, Grand Terrace, Planning Commission John Harper, City Attorney 18.0'0.070 CPD districts unless specific matting a lesser amount are• 1. AP one space per gross floor area, a minimum of ' provided2._ gross floor _ _ __ -floor shaft floor each uses requiring greater or per - two hundred square feet of four parking spaces shall be ------------- C-2 one�ac.e._pe-rr-t-wo—hundred square feet a area ,plus one safe -M=R. one space for each employee on the largest or one pang space per one thousand square feet of area, whichever is greater, and one parking space for vehicle operated or kept in connection with the use, 4 CPD four spaces per one thousand square feet of gross floor area B Off-street parking for the following AP and C-2 uses 1. Amusement enterprises, commercial recreation and similar uses one parking space for each four persons using or attending the facility, 2 Automobile sales, recreational vehicles, nurser- ies and similar uses not entirely enclosed one parking space for each two thousand square feet of open area devoted to display and sales, 3 Churches one parking space for each four fixed seats or for every twenty-five square feet of seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats Twenty-four linear inches of bench or pew shall be consid- ered as a fixed seat, 4 Hospitals one parking space for each four pLa- tient beds and one parking space for each staff member and employee on the largest shift, 5 Medical offices, clinics, veterinary hospitals five spaces for each doctor or dentist, 6. Restaurants, nightclubs and other similar places one parking space for each three seats and for ev- ery fifty square feet of floor area where seats may ne placed A minimum of ten parking spaces shall be provided, 7. Skating rinks one parking space for each three fixed seats and for each twenty square feet of seating area where there are no fixed seats Twenty-four linear inches of bench shall be considered a fixed seat One parking space for each two hundred fifty square feet of skating area, 8 Theaters, auditoriums and similar places of pub- lic assembly one parking space for each four fined seats and for every twenty-four square feet of seating area where there are no fixed seats. (Ord 57 §2 (19.050) , 1982) 18.60 070 Ad ustment of gross floor area The plan- ning commission may approve the use of a fasted gross floor area as a basis for the determination of the required park- ing in those instances where a proposed building design al- locates space to uses (such as elevators, foyers and PC MTG 11/21/88 560 ATTACHMENT C BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSCN Mayor Pro Tam Council Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCH V4B VARIANCE APPLICATION C/t/M-Inagar file no I INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN INK YOUR RESPONSI'S PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS COMPLETELY, AITACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY PLEASE USE EXAMPLES, WIIEN APPLICABLE,rOR CLARITY 1) Applicant's name CALIFORNIA SPIRITS, INC 2) Project address _Southside of Barton Road, 2nd lot east of Michigan Street 3) Applicant's address (if different) _22493_Barton Road,_ _ Grand Terrace, CA 92324 4) Applicant's telephone no (work)824_0628 (home)_ 824-3079_ 5) Owner's Name (if different) _ -CALIFORNIA- SPIRITS, INC 6) Owner's address (if different) _N A 7) Owner's telephone number (if different) N A 8) General Plan designation _ General Commercial 9) Zone C-2 _ Overlay Zone 10) Lot size 29,440 square feet 11) Building area Existing 0 S_F_ _ 0 % of Lot Area New 8,450 S_ F_ 28 % of Lot Area Total 8,450 S F 28 % of Lot Area 12) Living area total N A______ _ 13) Parking required Garage_ _N A _ , Open_-±46 Spaces provided Garage_ N_ A_ _ Open_35,_1�lus_1. loading 14) Setbacks Required Front 0 Rear 0 Side 0 _ _, Side 0 Proposed Front_ 24 Rear _ __6__ , Side__0 Szde 90__ C MTG 1 1 /21 /88-1- ATTACHMENT D 1) Describe your proposed project A retail_ f_acil_ity of_8,450 _square feet 2) Which sections of the Zoning Code do you wish to vary from' _Parking code requiring one �1�_ space__per _200 square -feet -of building,_ _plus one per each e�loyee on the largest shift 3) What is there about the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of your property that makes iL physically unique or special in contrast with other lots in the same zoning district`' The site is "L" shaped, containing a 33_foot wide section along __— _ south property line 4) Does this Variance authorize an act3viLy or use that is not authorized by the Zoning Ordinance' NO___ If yes, please explain 5) Does the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprive your property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zoning distr3 ct' -_Yes _ _ It ves , please give examples Terrace Town_ Centerhas an existing_ parking variance in effect Any other parig_v_ariancenranted _in the C-2 zone 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 14AVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND THAT 1HE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON IT AND THE REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS ARE CORRECT I CERTIFY 'THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION OR AN AGENT IULLY AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER 10 MAKE THIS APPLICATION I UNDERSTAND THAT IF ANY OF rHL INFORMATION IN MY SUBMISSION IS FOUND TO BE EITHER INCORRECT OR INSUFFICIENI, THE APPLICATION MAY DE REMOVED rROM THE AGFNDA UNTIL SUCH INFORMATION IS PROVIDED 1 November 7, 1988 A licant's Signature Date California Spirits, Inc Stan Curatolo, President 8/87 mcm -2- Y si 1 }V:1 ":p,�'" I d r • • ,yr - ar✓r+ ✓S .-. • - � .. � - ,,}} `��{,.;,vr i "1d'tr�',7J tii S �.,c tt'�in'f I.Y-Y4'.�t•' Sr t''i �"�- i r .y��,.� _ ' r .. "-,: >ti�.�}Lik L • A '� _ 1 l,.afjat4n`1'fEde+'l��Aia`+,Sei:.r`�tir`+h�'�i 1, '_I�.' �� 1l?' i I;Iriivi RIVERSIDE H 1 C H LAND WATER COMPANY 14SO WASHIN13TON STREET • COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324 • (714) B25-4123 F O CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324 ATTN DAV I D SAWYER )AIE OCI OBER 21, 1988 RE SA-88-17 22125 BARTON ROAD DEAR DAVE, THIS LOT HAS A 2'' WATER SERVICE THAT FEED THE II MOBILE HOME PARK AT 12135 MICHIGAN STREET THIS SERVICE LINE RUNS ACROSS THE LOT FROM NORTH TO SOUTH FOR ABOUT THE LENGTH OF THE LOT OUR METER IS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0"/- "�:q�� RICH HAUBERT - DISTRIBUTION SUPERINTENDENT u TRUCTIO J� TO SEI IDCR 1 i.OPY 2 tEIJD% HITL Al ID PINK COPES NTACT 1 II J I.- rN -1 Bu rd D,rl I. T, 1526b 0421 r la. I I r 1 1, 198 DATE JAiaW IJJH{a(1 `7NINNVId V L�6f Y 6 SIGNED Ir IS RUC JICr JS TO RLCCI% LR I WRITC RCPLY 2 DC TACH STUD KFEP P NK COF Y RETURN WHITL COPY TO SL Cc PC MTG 1 1 /21 /88 ATTACHMENT E FORESTRY AND FIRE V RDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 385 No Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0186 (714) 387 4212, 387 4213 1 FLOYD TIDWELL, Director EMERGENCY SERVICES \\ Ilk l ��.. _� �(av r�=,. -aR 1 'n 'i+� \�\ � � x�srr�.�� - 4 r L I1 l ll�l�A DATL OCTOBER 21, 1988 � � k" o TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RP,FERENCE NO SA 88-17 Y Cr Planning Dept APNry9�� L Ri GLLN J N5, MAN County FiLe Warden SUI3JLC'P FIRE PROTL-CTION REQUIRL'MLN'PS CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJDCT IXI F1 Zhe above refeLenced project is pLoLecLed by the Forestry 31001 & Fire Walden Dept Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the file department for verification of current fire protection development requirements IXI F2 All new consLt uc Lion shall comply with applicable sections of the 5L'002 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No 106) , Development Code, Cammunity Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and Legulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California IX F3 The street address shall be posted with a minimum of three (3) 5CO03 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San B---rnaLdiro County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy Posted numbers shall contrast with heir background ar-A be visible and legible from the street IXI F4 Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any 51 004 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be mainL- ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire Cod e IXI L'5 All flammable vegetation shall be Lemovel from each building 30005 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flamiiable building material, including a finished structure tX I F6 The development and each phase thereof shall have two points COO of vehicular access for fire and other emeLgency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code F7 Private roadways which exceed one-hundLed and fifty (150) in '007 length shall be approve] by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) Where (1) PC MTG 11/21/88 ATTACHMENT F the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department F8. A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 W08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six -hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Obde F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading 1E�IIfiq and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written docunentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction I1-1 F10 All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow 1F010 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prioz to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water The following are min unun requirements for your proposed development A System Standards *Fire Flow 2500 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with sprinklered building Duration 2 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received B Distrioution System Mains 6 inch minimun Ia terials 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimu-n C Fire Hydrants Numbers 1 Total (public only) Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate J Fll. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal - Oil (2) culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of required Fire Flow " F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection 3C 012 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 1231, "Water Supplies for Subuiban and Ebral Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel, the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department IX F13 The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department lPu, with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation I I F14 Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino QP014 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req- 11 015 uirements will be site specific to the proDect The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with 3urisdiction prior to recordation of the final map Nra intenance of said gLeenbel is and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department QucsLions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning x� >n, County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard- inu, California, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225 Thank you for your coopera- r-ion Sincerely, BY NANCY BEST Elie Protection Planning Inspector cc. Haden Atehitects Riverside -Highland Water File 3517 The following are IXI Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments (3) NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS REFERENCE # SA 88-17 NAME HADEN ARCHITECTS LOCATION 8450 sq ft /Retail bldg , 1 parcel E/O S/W corner of Barton/Michigan roads THE FOLLOWING NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT BASED UPON PLANS SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE PLEASE CONTACT THE INDICATED FIRE PROTLCTION PLANNING OFFICE FOR THE APPLICABLE STANDARD AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE IXI F16 Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1 F17 Any gated access shall be approved by the Fire Department and emergency access arrangements made prior to occupancy F18 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of sufficient information to review Please submit building plans and declaration of use for proper application of codes F19 The building occupancy is under the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshal Written documentation of review and inspection required prior to final occupancy Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441 F20 All flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79 Plan review and permit to operate are required F21 All commercial Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #3054 Plan review and permit to operate are required XI F22 All access roadways shall be in accordance with County Ordinance #3055 F23 Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards) Compliance with the pLovisions of County Ordinance #3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department shall be required In those areas not so designated under said ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan Overlay Ordinance will apply F24 An automatic fire alarm system is required Said system shall be installed to the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2 F25 Additional requirements shall be required as noted on attachments n-__ n A n n BOARD OF EDUCATION COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, California 92324-1798 (714)876-4227 October 24, 1988 MR ARLIE R HUBBARD City of Grand Terrace President planning Department MRS DORTHA E COOLEY 22795 Barton Rd, Vice President Grand Terrace, CA 92324 PJ C: n� l ��8 DL)-AH1ti1ENr MR RAY ABRIL JR Clerk Subject SA-88-13 Recycling Pl4nL/21516 Main St, MRS WENDY S CURRAN MRS RUTHO HARRIS The Colton Joint- Unified School District is impacted at the present time. As a result, the district is charging MRS PATRICIAI NIX a fee of 25 cents per sq ft on new commercial/industrial. MRS PHYLLISV ZIMMCRMAN development, based on covered and enclosed space, These funds are currently subject to the "State Match" which means all money collected is currently under state control ADMINISTRATION Although the district does not oppose the above mentioned project, it is increasingly concerned about the tzaff xc MR RUSSELLI DICKINSON impact of additional development in the viciziity of Grand Superintendent Terrace Elementary School, The district requests that MR CHARLES14 JORDAN the pzimary access for trucks be directed away from the Ast,.�tdntSuperintendent Personnel Barton Rd offramp and Michigan Ave, MR ROBERT W MURPHY A�stStdntSupenntendent Business Subject SA-88-16 Single Family Residence/23325 Westwood 4ve MISS NANCY A NORTON Assistant Superintendent The Colton Joint Unified School District is impacted at the Curriculum and Instruction present time As a result, the district is charging a fee of MR DANNYCARRASCO $l 53 per sq £t on new residential construction, based on Director Administrative Services habitable space MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Director Pupil Personnel Services These funds are currently subject to the "State Match" and must be contributed to the state as the local share of building new schools The school district has no objections to the above mentioned project provided the city is willing to assist, if necessary, in the provision of additional classrooms ,at a future date Subject SA-88-17 Retail Center/22125 Barton Rd As mentioned earlier, the school district is becoming increasingly concerned about noise and traffic along Barton Rd. which impacts Grand Terrace Elementary School The addition of a 8,450 sq ft' retail building will increase this impact Also, please advise the applicant that the school district will oppose the granting of an alcoholic'beVerage license to any of the stores in the complex, due to the proximity to a school If these conditions are accepthble or mitigated, the school district would have no objections to the project, subject to the 25 cent per sq ft fee FCAL MTuGY EMPLJY c�hnnl ra j1iHps_ 876-4112 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONa DISTRICT B P O BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402 TDD (714) 3834609 �' Id - L October 21, 1988 OCT 24 1988 PLANNINL, DEVAHI&IENT Planning Department City of Grand Terrace Attention Mr David Sawyer 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr Sawyer Development Review 08-SBd-215-1 31 Your Reference SA-88-17 Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed construction of the Grand Terrace Retail Center located east of I-215, south of Barton Road in Grand Terrace This proposal is somewhat removed from an existing or proposed state highway Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the State highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of this area We have no specific comment on this proposal If additional information is desired, please call Mr Thomas J Neville at (714) 383-4384 Very truly yours,, H N LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer PC MTG 1 1 /21 /88 ATTACHMENT H NOV 1 7 1988 ` _ v, I _ , TO David Sawyer, Planning Director FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer �r DATE November 16, 1988 RE -V--8B-2- California Spirits, Inc Barton Road BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGIIAUSEN Mayor Pro Tern Council Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCIIW4,B Ciry Manager W 0 12-8 5105 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for subject project 1 Barton Road (a) Construct standard sidewalk along the frontage of subject property (b) Remove and replace any curb that is or may be damaged during construction 2 Michigan Street (a) Dedicate to provide for 44 foot half —street along the frontage of subject parcel (b) Install curb and gutter and standard drive approach (c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline 3 Provide adequate drainage facilities 4 Submit grading plan for proposed improvements on subject parcel 5 Improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City li1C�0�1J; �i z 7')7Qr,. RARTr)m PnA-n a (;RAKin TP:PQArP: r`A Q7Q')A_r,)ar-, e r`IXIIf rP:HTFR — (71A) P9A_CR`Jy Chairman Hargrave opened the meeting with the public participation for items other than those that were on this evening's agenda. Public Participation - No input from the public. Item #1 P.C. Minutes No minutes submitted for approval at this time. Item #2 t V-88-2/California Spirits, Inc. Haden Architects Request for Variance on parking code requiring one (i) space per 200 square feet of building, plus one (1) space per each employee on the largest shift. ec arton Road, G.T. Haden Architects Site and Architectural Review application for a commercial retail center of 8,450 square feet. The Community Development Director presented the staff report on the variance with the conditions of denial. The Community Development Director presented the staff report on the Site and Architectural Review with the conditions of denial based on inadequate parking under the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and this proposed center being a "strip commercial" development, which is of special concern to the City and that area shall be designated for a special study to determine methods to prevent the "strip commercial" type of development under the General Plan. Chairman Hargrave opened discussion amongst the Planning Commissioners. ' Commissioner Buchanan referred to a plan submitted in the packet dated October 17, 1988 which indicates a loading space, He asked if this was a modification. The Community Development Director explained that was originally on the plan but the dimensions show that the site has the correct dimensions but it is equal with the other spaces so it needs to be worked out as far as the actual dimensions and how it will sit on that corner. Discussion regarding the Riverside Highland Water Company's easement location on this property. E a AT-rAr-14NAPKI r r The Community Development Director stated that it has not been indicated where it crossed the lot. He did indicate that they received the plans and did not comment that it would be a hinderance. Discussion on the loading access and the location of the door. The Community Development Director explained that it would essentially be the same as the north door. It was not indicated in the plan but the applicant stated that there would be a door back there. Discussion on the current parking code and allowed spaces for the employees and loading spaces. The Community Development Director clarified that there is no r strict guideline per the Code regarding how many loading spaces or square footage Staff normally uses the guideline that one employee is necessary for every 1000 square feet of retail space because of that they come up with 8 employee parking spaces. The other guideline for staff is to look at the type of units that are going in and the design of the area and the type of building There is a section of the Code that allows the Planning Director flexibility in the parking requirements where he does not have to go before the Planning Commission for a variance in order to vary from the parking requirements. Discussion on the handicapped parking per UBC requirements. The Community Development Director indicated for this size building, one space would be adequate, however staff will check the Code The handicapped spaces are included in the total number of parking spaces required. Commissioner Buchanan referred to the City Engineer's memo and the requirement for dedication along Michigan However, along Barton Road there was a requirement for construction of a standard sidewalk. He asked if this property was already fronting at the appropriate location along Barton Road. The Community Development Director responded that the Planning Department did not look into the width or dedication requirement on Barton Road, that was referred to the City Engineer. Since he has not included that on Barton Road but did include that on Michigan it looks as though the right of way is necessary for that but not the development of it. So the improvements would be required but there would not be any dedication necessary whereas on Michigan there would be dedication required. 3 Discussion on the western boundary line at the end of the driveway and if it was drawn at the current Michigan or if it took into account the 44' half street. The Community Development Director stated that it was not indicated. Discussion on whether or not another space was going to be lost. The Community Development Director pointed out that there was flexibility as far as sliding those all the way down to avoid any loss. Discussion on the General Plan and what would be permitted in regards to "strip commercial". The Community Development Director explained that "strip commercial" would be the type of development where every particular lot would develop on its own independently of other lots on each side of it. The effects are wasted space, incomplete architecture (180 degrees) and parking does not work out as well. Commissioner Hilkey clarified that it is not just an architectural problem but the concept as a whole is a problem. Discussion on the General Plan "Implementation Policy" section. Commissioner Hilkey asked if the parking and architectural problems were corrected this project still would not come close to meeting the General Plan requirements The Community Development Director stated that this project would still not meet the intent of the General Plan. Discussion on the Terrace Towne Center and the Conditional Use Permit which addressed parking issues back in 1983. Discussion on the Cal Trans recommendation that "consideration must be given to the culminative effect of continued development". The Planning Commission discussed what avenue could be taken to get some plan in place for Barton Road. The Community Development Director explained that the General Plan addresses the issues referred to by Cal Trans; is access being provided, is Barton Road wide enough to handle traffic generated by new sites. Also, the concept of a specific plan for Barton Road is being addressed. Staff is anticipating going to Council for approval to send out proposals for a specific plan on Barton Road. Discussion on the parking variance applied for based on the Municipal Code versus variance per land use. 4 Discussion on Municipal Code interpretations. The Planning Commission has the authority to create variances and the City Council has the authority to change the municipal code. PUBLIC HEARING CONVENED AT 7:30 P.M. l.Richard Hickey Haden Architects/Stan Curatola Representative y Mr. Hickey stated would like to the plead to the mercy of the Commission with respect to the parking variance of excessive parking requirement of 1 to 200 for general retail use. He presented the history of the project which started with building permits pulled in 1982 for a building in excess of 10,500 sq. feet with available parking spaces of 34, and one loading space At that time the proposed use for the building was for a home improvement center. The applicant was asked at that time to wait on his project due to an incoming large development. After much delay and loss of money the applicant has now decided to go ahead with this new project. Discussion on the present Terrace Towne Center parking conditions. Commissioner Van Gelder asked Mr. Hickey how many tenants were planned for this facility. Mr. Hickey assumed at least two at the present with current discussion involving a third. Currently one is for an expansion of a current business (liquor store), and the other consideration is for Chief Auto Parts. 2. Kent Van Gelder Coordinator Colton Unified School District Mr. Van Gelder explained that the Colton Unified School District has advised the applicant that it will oppose the granting of an ABC license to any vendor in this project. He explained that the community is better served by its own representatives and asks them to act on their behalf. The district requests that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared to addressed CEQA issues and to provide an opportunity for all interested and concerned citizens to address this project. The Community Development Director explained that staff has reviewed this and feels that it is categorically exempt from CEQA. CEQA does require that if there are concerns from the community then that needs to be taken up. The Planning 5 Commission should allow staff to come back and analyze what the CEQA code says and confer with the City Attorney as far as the requirements of EIR. Commissioner Buchanan asked if the CEQA issue was directly related to the parking variance. The Community Development Director explained that would be tied in with the Site and Architectural Review. Discussion on the driveway that exits onto Barton Road and the alignment of the intersection of Barton Road and Vivienda Avenue. Discussion on Vivienda Avenue being the other surface road for the Grand Terrace Elementary School. PUBLIC BEARING ADJOURNED AT 7:45 P.M. PLANNING DISCUSSION CONVENED AT 7:45 P.M. Discussion on the building permits pulled in 1982 and the expiration of same. Commissioner Buchanan asked the Community Development Director for his input on the representative's comments on the Terrace Towne Center's variance. The Community Development Director explained that he was not with the City at that time. He has not reviewed the findings that were made at that time to produce the variance. He cautioned the Planning Commission not to compare variances since the findings would not be the same for each. The Community Development Director pointed out that there was too much building proposed for this site with our codes as they stand today. If the building size is reduced the necessary parking numbers is reduced also and they can be met. The site and shape is not hurting this development only the size of the building is causing the problem. Discussion of the Terrace Towne Center and this proposed project being in a C-2 Zone. Commissioner Van Gelder expressed her concerns with three issues; the strip development, the parking and the location of a liquor store near the grade school. Commissioner Hawkinson expressed his opposition to granting excessive variances. A MOTION PCH-88-87 Vice -Chairman Hawkinson made the motion to deny V-88-2 as proposed by staff. Commissioner Van Gelder second. Chairman Hargrave appreciated the applicant's predicament. He does oppose variances. This project is not in line with the General Plan's consideration for this area and unfortunately the applicant falls victim in the political process. MOTION VOTE PCM-88-87 00 Motion carried 5-0-2-0. Commissioners Munson and Sims absent. The Community Development Director requested the Planning Commission to open the public hearing for a response from the applicant. PUBLIC HEARING CONVENED AT 7:55 P.M. Mr. Hickey expressed his appreciation to the Chairman for his comments in respect to the political process and the realities of the matter in respect to the situation of the owner. (He presented a preliminary revision of their project as an alternative). Chairman Hargrave asked the Community Development Director if he has seen the prelimiary revisions. The Community Development Director explained that he was delivered a copy late this afternoon and had not had the chance to analyze it. He summarized the process that has taken place so far regarding this project There was an action for denial of the variance, and the Site and Architectural Review is remaining. There are a few options available to the Planning Commission. First, to follow staff's recommendations to deny the Site and Architectural Review. Or secondly, the Commission can kill this item and have it brought back to the Commission and go over the alternatives that were presented. Also, this would enable the staff to further research the request from the school board for an EIR (after checking with the City Attorney) at the next meeting. Or thirdly, the Commission can approve the project this evening. 7 The Community Development Director explained to the applicant that a decision has been made regarding the variance and there is a 10 day appeal period to the City Council. Chairman Hargrave suggested waiting for the General Plan Revisions before the applicant's project is decided upon. PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED AT 8t00 P.M. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL CONVENED AT 8:00 P.M. MOTION PCM-88-88 Commissioner Hilkey made the motion to deny SA-88-17, based on the parking and conflict with the General Plan. Chairman Hargrave second Vice -Chairman Hawkinson stated that he could not support this motion. He was more in favor of a continuance after the Community Development Director has had more time to review the revised plans. The Community Development Director summarized the possible directions indicated by the Planning Commission. One was whether or not the Site and Architectural Review of this project be denied. If that occurs in order for the applicant to come back to the Planning Commission he either has to wait one (1) year to resubmit or he has to make significant changes to the project. The other alternative is that this item can be continued. The Community Development Director clarified that the issue is whether the applicant is being led down the road or not. He feels that after the December 8th, 1988 City Council Meeting, the Planning Commission and staff may have a better idea whether or not the Barton Road Specific Plan would be feasible. It may be worth it to wait for the City Council's Meeting to see if that is an issue that staff and the Commission need to take into consideration or not. Commissioner Hilkey asked if there would be an economic hardship to the applicant if this project was denied or a decision was made to postpone. The Community Development Director stated to the affirmative and the applicant would have to reapply with a significantly changed project. The changed project would still come under the $550 fee whereas if the project is continued there would be no additional fee. MOTION FV PF PCM-88-88 WITHDRAWN Commissioner Hilkey withdrew his motion. Second concurred. MOTION PCM-88-88 Commissioner Hilkey made the motion to continue SA-88-17, until the December 19, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting. Chairman Hargrave and Vice -Chairman Hawkinson second. Mr. Pippy, the applicant's representative, stated that would be two weeks longer than he would like. He stated that they would be more than flexible, to a certain extent, to make a adjustments to the project PUBLIC HEARING ADJOURNED AT 8.10 P.M. Commissioner Hawkinson asked the Community Development Director if he felt there was a chance that the General Plan would be adopted at the December 8, 1988 City Council Meeting The Community Development Director explained that it would hopefully be around that time approximately He stated that he did not feel the adoption of the General Plan has alot of bearing on this issue. The existing General Plan has the same guidelines and the same implementation policies as the proposed for this particular parcel. Commissioner Buchanan clarified that the reason the Community Development Director was recommending after the December 8, 1988 City Council Meeting is at that time he would be anticipating the City Council to make some decision on the feasibility of a Barton Road Specific Plan. The Community Development Director responded to the affirmative because staff would be requesting the City Council at the December 8, 1988 Meeting approval to send out requests for proposals on a Barton Road Specific Plan. Commissioner Buchanan asked if the City Council considering whether or not a Barton Road Specific Plan is feasible would make any difference. He could understand if on December 8, 1988 that they would vote on a Specific Plan that would make a big difference but to simply be authorizing the Community Development Director to go out and ask people to submit proposals for creating a Specific Plan he questioned where that would make a difference 9 i The Community Development Director explained that would delay the process because if RFPs were not sent out because the Specific Plan was not feasible then that implies that the current codes are sufficient in carrying out the General Plan implementation policies, then the Commission can act based on that. However, if the City Council says to go out for bids then the issue would be dealt with but what direction would be taken if they go the other direction then they would answer the question. Commissioner Buchanan asked how that would answer the question. The Community Development Director explained that the issue of a Specific Plan is not an issue. He clarified that was what is holding up the Planning Commission. It is seen that this is in conflict of the General Plan guidelines for the a development for Barton Road. The General Plan says to designate a plan and have something to implement those policies. The Council then says lets not do a plan or is not ready to do that right now, then they have to deal with the fact that there are people in town who want to go forward with commercial ventures and they are being stalled. The Planning Commission, staff and the Council will have to react to that indepently. Commissioner Buchanan asked if the Site and Architectural Review is denied on this pro] ect, would the applicant have the same 10 day appeal period as the variance denial. The Community Development Director stated to the affirmative. Commissioner Buchanan stated that it seemed to him that the Planning Commission is looking towards the City Council for direction. Chairman Hargrave responded that this should be the responsibility of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Hilkey stated that his motion was intended to simply save the applicant the problems of resubmitting. He did not think this project was close to the General Plan or close to being passed by the Planning Commission. MOTION PCM-88-88 VOTE Motion carried. 3-2-2-0. Chairman Hargrave and Commissioner Buchanan voting noe. Commissioners Munson and Sims absent 10 Vice -Chairman Hawkinson warned the Planning Commission that if this is denied then they are passing their responsibility of the conditions to the City Council. Commissioner Van Gelder stated that she realized the problems faced by developers relating to time and finances. She questioned how staff could give any viable aid to the applicants in cases like this and to know what the City does want when the City does not know itself. The Community Development Director explained that he has been working with the applicant on possible alternatives. He pointed out that the revised plan submitted this evening represented action towards those ends; a scaling down of the building and an increase of parking. Perhaps the code is not being met exactly but it is within that flexibility range where he can present it to the Commission and state that he feels comfortable with the parking issue on this He hap no answer in regards to the General Plan or Specific Plan and can only wait and see for action by the City Council Chairman Hargrave moved to the next item of the Site and Architectural Review Board ITEM #4 SA-88-19 ADDITION BETWEEN TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS ROBERT LEE D.D.S. CORPORATION 22575 BARTON ROAD G.T. The Associate Planner, Jeri Ram, presented the staff report with the conditions and recommendations of approval as presented by staff, the City Engineer, and the reviewing agencies. Chairman Hargrave asked if the addition was for the purpose of continuing Dr. Lee's dental practice. The Community Development Director explained it would be for a continuance of the existing use. Chairman Hargrave asked if staff was anticipating any maDor structural changes for the buildings that were already there The Community Development Director explained that the changes would be basically for the connection of the two independent buildings with the front decorative block facial treatment that is existing. From the rear it will be noticed where the addition comes in and that is where the landscaping issue needs to be addressed. The addition will create a solid block wall of building and some of the atrium landscaping can be transferred to the parking area. That can be done and still 11 BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tom CouncO Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager I TO: Site and Architectural Review Board FROM: David Sawyer, Community Development Director DATE: February 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Staff Report, SA-88-17 APPLICANT: California Spirits, Inc./Stan Curatolo, President LOCATION: 22125 Barton Road ZONING PROPERTY 92 ZONING LNM USE Subject Property GC C-2 Vacant To the North PUB PUB Grand Terrace Elementary School and OC AP Urgent Care Center To the South GC C-2 Mobile Home Park To the East GC C-2 Beauty Parlor To the West GC C-2 Gasoline Station BACKGROUND The subject property contains 29,440 square feet and is currently vacant. It is located on the south side of Barton Road, just east of Michigan (see Attachment A). On November 21, 1988, applicant appeared before your Commission with applications for Site and Architectural Review approval (SA- 88-17 and a variance on the parking (V-88-2). As you will recall, the variance was denied and a continuance was granted for SA-88-17 to allow applicant time to resubmit new plans that conformed with the parking requirements. ATTACHMENT 9979R RARTON ROAD 9 GRAND TERRACE. CA 92324-52 i CIVIC CENTER -- (7141 824-6621 The applicant has resubmitted plans for Site and Architectural Review approval. One of the primary factors in determining the quality of Grand Terrace's future is how Barton Road is allowed to develop. Both the 1984 General Plan and the revised General Plan adopted by the City Council in 1988 state the following assessment of development along Barton Road: "Prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern. It is the intent of the General Plan that new commercial uses be carefully monitored. New commercial uses should relate to existing development. Isolated commercial projects as well as conversion of residential units to commercial uses should be limited and prevented wherever possible." The General Plan also states the following Implementation Policy: "Commercial areas along Barton Road shall be designated for special study and methods to prevent "strip commercial" type development investigated. This will require financial and legal cooperation between local merchants, landowners, and the City." In December, 1988, City Council authorized staff to send out Request For Proposals for the preparation of a Specific Plan for Barton Road. The Request for Proposals are planned to be sent to Planning Consultant firms within the next week. This project would be constructed in a key location along Barton Road in the area designated for the Specific Plan. Because of its location it will dictate architectural styles and development along the City's gateway. Architecture The Applicant has reduced the size of the proposed commercial structure from 8,450 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed building will be oriented eastward, with parking entrances on Barton Road and Michigan Street. The Applicant proposes to separate, the building into two or three retail units. The Applicant previously submitted elevations that illustrated the structure with a terra cotta spanish tile roof, light tan stucco below the roof areas and on the pillars, dark tan split faced block walls with teal blue accent trim. The new elevations indicate that the pillars have been removed and the roof line on the east elevation has been modified. The new roof line continues partially around the east elevation and then stops. The east elevation would be visible to those traveling west along Barton Road. Since the building is offset from the property line by approximately 10 feet, it is recommended that a combination of landscaping and architectural relief be added to that elevation to break up the starkness of the wall. In addition, this will ensure that if future development occurs along this side of the project in the future, it will not be faced with just a plain rear of a building to the west. The west elevation, which faces the parking area is mainly comprised of large floor to ceiling windows. The north (or Barton Road) elevation has no architectural features. This elevation is important because it fronts on Barton road and �° it should be revised so that it looks less like a side of a building. The south elevation has no window or architectural relief, however, it will not be seen from Barton Road. The building design is very simple and incorporates virtually no architectural relief. The floor to ceiling windows on the west elevation contribute to the starkness of the design. It is recommended that the roof line be revised to include architectural relief and a focal point for the building. These changes should reflect a 360 degree perspective. In addition, the Barton Road (north) elevation should be redesigned incoporating some archectectural elements. The landscaping to parking ratio, required in the Municipal Code has been met by the Applicant. The Applicant is proposing to primarily use ground cover, Cupaniopsis Anacardioiodes trees and one type of shrub, Raphiolepis Indica, in the parking area. Staff feels that the landscaping in some of the planter areas could be revised to include more types of plants with more dimension. This could create a more interesting effect. The landscaping on Barton Road proposed by the Applicant is lawn and Raphiolepis Indica shrubs. Staff feels that some type of berming and/or rock formations should be added to the lawn to give it some dimension. There is no indication of the required street tree planting on the plans. Pursuant to Section 12.28 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, there must be one tree planted per lot, or if the lot has more than 80 feet of frontage, one per 40 feet must be planted. Since there is no proposed landscaping on the east side of the parking area, against the building, it is suggested that some planters be added against the building, not to block the walkways, but to add some texture and color to the wall areas. Landscaping should also be added to the west elevation to break up the starkness of that elevation (as indicated above). The Applicant has provided 35 standard parking spaces with one handicapped and loading space. This meets the requirements of the Municipal Code in relation to parking. An improvement could be made in the design of the entire parking area and building by incorporating a stamped concrete entry way into the parking lot that would be colored and patterned the same as the roof tiles. The following comments were received on this project from our reviewing agencies: 1. Memorandum from Riverside Highland Water Company, dated ' October 21, 1988 (Attachment B); 2. Memorandum from Forestry and Fire Warden Department dated October 21, 1988 (Attachment C); 3. Memorandum from Colton Unified School District dated October 24, 1988 (Attachment D); 4. Memorandum from the Department of Transportation, State of California (CALTRANS) dated October 21, 1988 (Attachment E); and 5. Memorandum from City Engineer dated November 16, 1988 (Attachment F). The Planning Department recommends that the Site and Architectural Review Board: 1. Continue SA-88-17 until after the preparation of the Barton Road Specific Plan or for one year, whichever is sooner; 2. Recommend to Applicant to work with the consultant to come up with a plan that will fit in with the overall Specific Plan for Barton Road. Respectfull Submitted: t D vid Sawyer Community Development Director FO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE 22795 BARTON ROAD ,,AND TERRACE, CA 92324 ,,,TN: DAVID SAWYER OCTOBER 21, 1988 RE SA-88-17 22125 BARTON ROAD EAR DAVE, THIS LOT HAS A 2" WATER SERVICE THAT FEED THE I,I OBILE HOME PARK AT 12135 MICHIGAN STREET. THIS ERVICE LINE RUNS ACROSS THE LOT FROM NORTH TO OUTH FOR ABOUT THE LENGTH OF THE LOT OUR METER IS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY RICH HAUBERT - DISTRIBUTION SUPERINTENDENT PIt�TRUCTIONa TO SENDCR i �I IOW COPY :SEND WF9TE AND P94K COPIES NTACT JI/iti I IL Dit� vj BoofA Dr9aa. T.0 7526"429 ,A.+ (-40C 1982 SIGNED bnW (NV 6661 1oo " 1 "' 'R a�j INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER I WRITE REMY 2-DETACH STUD KEEP PVK COPY RETURN W"TC COPY TO SLMMIi I r, pp Nrr.,. a ATTAr,HMENT B I ORESTRY AND F11, ' WARDEN DEPARTMET_; - COUNTY - of sAly BERNARDINO re Protection Planning Services • Bounty Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 15 No Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92416-0186 FLOYD TIDW& I., Director < 14) 387-4211, 387.4213 �-- EMERGENCY SERVICES 'E . OCTOBER 21, 1988 61, - CITY OF GRAND TERRACE; REFERENCE N0, SA 88-17 Planning Dept. APN. PLAN414G UENNrI�,Ilr1' )m ' GLEN J. NEWMAN County Fire Warden QMT FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT Fl. The above referenced pro3ect is piot_:cted by the Forestry ►01 & Fire Warden Dept. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development. requirements. F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the 102 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No. 106) , Development Cbde, Cammunity Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California. z3. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of three (3) 103 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino Obunty Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street. F4. Each chimney used in conDunction with any fireplace or any 104 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint— ained with an approval spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. F5. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building 105 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points 106 of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Develognent Code. F7. Private roadways which exceed one -hundred and fifty (150) in 107 length shall be approved by the fire agency having Durisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%). Where (1) .w 'AT i A,C�H,IIENT the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. F8. A turn --around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six -hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Code. F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading 109 A snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. -itten documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having Durisdiction. F10 All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow )10 requirements specifzde in the Conditions of Approval for this proDect shall be approved by the fire agency having Ourisdiction prior to the installation of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor. Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having 3urisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water. abe following are minimum requirements for your proposed development System Standards *Fire Flow 2500 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with sprinklered building Duration 2 hour/s Hydrant Spacing Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received. B Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Riser' 6 inch minimum C. Fire hydrants Nunber s 1 Total (public only) Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street valve 6 Inch Gate I F11 The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal- (2) J culations, using the 1974 edatin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of Fequired Fire Flow." F12. In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection U water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for bliburban and ftral Eire Fighting". A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. -13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fare department U th two copies of water system improvement plans where fare protection water systems are required. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. F14 Mountain Fare Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino 114 County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced. F15. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone skull be required. Req- 115 uirements will be site specific to the pr03ect. The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fare department with 3urisdiction prior to recordation of the final map, Maintenance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department. :stions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning ti( County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard- , caiifornia, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225 `hank you for your coopera- m �cerely, NARY BEST 'are Protection Planning Inspector Haden Atc hi tec is Riverside -Highland Water File 3517 following are IXI Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments: (3) NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS NAME. HADEN ARCHITECTS REFERENCE: # SA 88-17 LOCATION: 8450 sq.ft./ Retail bldg., 1 parcel E/O S/W corner of Barton/Michigan roads. THE FOLLOWING NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT BASED UPON PLANS SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE. PLEASE CONTACT THE INDICATED FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING OFFICE FOR THE APPLICABLE STANDARD AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE. IXI F16. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1. F17. Any gated access shall be approved by the Fire Department and emergency access arrangements made prior to occupancy. F18 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of sufficient information to review. Please submit building plans and declaration of use for proper application of codes. F19. The building occupancy is under the 3urisdiction of the State Fire Marshal. Written documentation of review and inspection required prior to final occupancy. Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441. F20. A11 flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79. Plan review and permit to operate are required. F21. All commercial Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #3054. Plan review and permit to operate are required. IXI F22. All access roadways shall be in accordance with County A Ordinance #3055. F23. Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards) . Compliance with the provisions of County Ordinance #3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department shall be required. In those areas not so designated under said ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan Overlay Ordinance will apply. F24. An automatic fire alarm system is required. Said system shall be installed to the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2 ' Pig F25. Additional requirements shall be required as noted on attachments . M1 IOARD OF EDUCATION MR ARLIE R HUBBARD President Mno OORTHA E COOLEY Vtoe President MR RAY AB RIL, JR Clerk MRS WENDY S CURRAN MRS RUTH O HARRIS MRS PATRICIA I NV MRS PHYLLIS V ZIMMERMAN ADMINISTRATION JSSELL I DICKINSON Superintendent MR CHARLES H JORDAN ;istant Superintendent, Personnel MR ROBERT W MURPHY ssistant Superintendent, Buuness MISS NANCY A NORTON Assistant Supertntondent Curnculum and Instruction MR DANNY CARRASCO Director, Admtntstrapve Services MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Director Pupd Personnel Services COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, California 92324-1798 (714)876-4227 October 24, 14.88 City of Grand Terrace Planning Department 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 42324 PeC,tzIV 1 " "IMmnc, V kkM141ktjT Subject. SA-88-13 Recycling Plant/21516 Main St, The Colton Joint Unified School District is impacted at the present time. As a result, the district is charging a fee of 25 cents per sq, ft. on new commercial/industrial development, based on covered and enclosed space, These funds are currently subject to the "State Match,, which means all money collected is currently under state contrQlt Although the district does not oppose the ab-ove mentioned project, it is increasingly concerned about the txAgfLc impact of additional development in the vicinity of Grand Terrace Elementary School, The district requests that the primary access for trucks be directed away from tha $arton Rd. offramp.and Michigan Ave,10V Subject- SA-88-16 Single Family Residence/23325 Westwood Ave The Colton Joint Unified School District is impacted at the present time. As a result, the district is charging a fee of $1.53 per sq. ft. on new residential construction, based on habitable space. These funds are currently subject to the "State Match" and Must be contributed to the state as the local share of building new schools. The school district has no objections to the above mentioned project provided the city is willing to assist, if necessary, in the provision of additional classrooms,at a future date, ,J ov Subject, SA-88-17 Retail Center/22125 Barton Rd As mentioned earlier, the school district is becoming increasingly concerned about noise and traffic along Barton Rd- which impacts Grand Terrace Elementary School. The addition,of a 8,450 sq. ft? retail building will increase this impact. Also, please advise the applicatit that the school district will oppose the granting of an alcoholic'be-�erage ]license to any of the stores in the complex, due to the proximity to a school If these conditions are accepthble or r- mitigated, the school district would have no objections to the I},� project, subject to the 25 cent per sq. ft fee y 1,1 cni Inl n00f)MTI IAII-rV PnAPI r)YFR STATE OF CAMFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Govan" DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION )ISTRICT 8, P 0 BOX 231 w SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92402 k' C L. j V fDD (714) 383-4609 October 21 , 1988 OCT 24 1988 PUNNING OLf AN(MENT Planning Department Development Review 08-SBd-215-1.31 Your Reference: SA-88-17 City of Grand Terrace 4 Attention Mr. David Sawyer 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr. Sawyer. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed construction of the Grand Terrace Retail Center located east of I-215, south of Barton Road in Grand Terrace. This proposal is somewhat removed from an existing or proposed state highway. Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the State highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of this area. We have no specific comment on this proposal. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Neville at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours-, H N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer ?C. hTG. 2-V2/4? ATTACHMENTE" BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN L Mayor Pro Tom Council Members HUGHJ GRANT NOV 17 1988 DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB LI 1111111 �1 1 Cily Managor W 0. 12-8.5105 TO David Sawyer, Planning Director / 1.4 FROM Aseph Kicak, City Engineer DATE, November 16, 1988 51� 16 % -1-1 RE California Spirits, Inc Barton Road Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for subject project. 1 Barton Road. (a) Construct standard sidewalk along the frontage of subject property. (b) Remove and replace any curb that is or may be damaged during construction 2 Michigan Street (a) Dedicate to provide for 44 foot half -street along the frontage of subject parcel (b) Install curb and gutter and standard drive approach (c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline, 3. Provide adequate drainage facilities ' 4. Submit grading plan for proposed improvements on subject parcel. 1 5. Improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City. 1 00 0 )C AR& 2-21-B�1 ATTACH�v1ENT F ATTACHMENT E THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR THE FEBRUARY 21, 1989 MEETING WILL BE SUBMITTED ON MONDAY DATE S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE SUBJECT REPORT ON PLEXCO INDUSTRIES IN COLTON FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED Apr 6 , 198 9 Apr 13, 1989 At the Council Meeting of March 23rd Council heard testimony by Mr Larry Halstead regarding the granting of an operating permit to Plexco Industries in Colton which is approximately a half mile from our border There was concern expressed that the manufacturing process conducted at the site would result in toxic materials being emitted into the air, as well as possible ground water contamination to the Santa Ana River Basin Mayor Matteson contacted the Colton Chamber of Commerce and arranged a tour of the facility and an explanation of the processing being conducted on the site On the following Tuesday the Mayor and myself toured the facility and have the following observations to transmit to the Council The facility is currently licensed to fabricate bulk polyethylene pellets into polyethylene pipe used primarily in the natural gas industry as gas line The larger pipes being made are used mainly for industrial applications in pumping fluids from point-to-point within a plant I was allowed to take samples of the materials used by Plexco These materials will be available at the Council Meeting, and prior to that they will be available for review in the City Manager's office They consist of white polyethylene beads that are mixed together with the orange, yellow or black polyethylene beads, depending on the desired property needed The beads are heated to approximately 300 degrees, melting the beads, and then formed into a mold to create a continuous pipe which is cooled by water held in a closed system 1 c , ^ N { 1— , I F lam/ STAFF REPORT -- Report on Plexo Industries April 13, 1989 Page Two No manufacturing of plastics is conducted on the site and the melting of the beads does not emit any gaseous by-products There was mention made of potential trichloroethylene being emitted into the atmosphere The process does not emit any chemicals The water used to cool the molded pipe is poured over the length of the pipe As it moves through the extruding machine, the water is held in a closed system that cools the pipe, it is then pumped to cooling towers to lose heat and then back over the pipe in a continuous closed loop There was mention that cadmium is used in the process Plexco indicated that by law that any product they use that contains cadmium of any level must be disclosed They indicated that in the manufacturing of the orange and yellow colorant beads cadmium is used Minute amounts of cadmium are present within those colorant beads, but at a non -toxic level They indicated that the cadmium is molecularly combined in the plastic and is not released at any time in the process Staff found the operation to be extremely clean and environmentally safe Plexco invites any member of the City Council or concerned citizens to view the operation of the plant If anyone wishes to do so, contact the City Manager's office and I will arrange for a tour Based on the information that was acquired both from the City of Colton and Plexco, staff finds no grounds to consider legal action to prevent issuance of an occupancy permit TS bt DATE Apr 7, 1 98 9 S T A FF R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Apr 13, 1989 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF DEDICATION -- 11830 MT VERNON AVE FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED Attached is the report requested regarding the dedication or potential condemnation of a portion of the right-of-way at 11830 Mt Vernon Avenue Currently, the frontage on this parcel is 321 f t The City has 43 feet of right-of-way for 206 feet and 33 feet of right-of-way for 115 feet of the total 321 feet In order for the City to acquire the entire necessary right-of- way we would need an additional foot of the 206 foot area for a total of 206 square feet and 11 feet of additonal dedication for the 115 foot stretch for a total of 1,265 square feet The grand total square footage required for dedication is 1,471 square feet In the City Engineer's report (attached), the estimated value of the dedication being made by Dr McDuffee is a land cost of $2,942 and litigation guarantee cost of $300 for a total dedication value to the City of $3,242 Also in the City Engineer's report is the estimated cost of the improvements that Dr McDuffee is requesting which is curb/gutter/sidewalk, three driveways, landscaping, street lighting and construction of a drainage facility for a total cost of approximately $39,000 The primary concern for consideration is the construction of the improvements to provide two lanes of traffic in the southerly direction on Mt Vernon without Dr McDuffee's property creating an obstruction Currently, within the existing 33 feet of right- of-way, the City Engineer's report indicates that the necessary amount of right-of-way that has already been dedicated would be sufficient to allow the City to grade and pave out the area to the full width and pave a shoulder for pedestrian traffic within our current right-of-way of 33 feet }a t ,-P / 1 j— 41'rl 3e U M The STAFF REPORT -- 11830 Mt Vernon April 13, 1989 Page Two CONSIDERATION OF DEDICATION -- Ave The approximate cost of this alternative indicated by the City Engineer is $12,000 to $14,000 This particular alternative would require the removal of the fence and much of the shrubbery that exists within the City's right-of-way STAFF RECOMMENDS CONSIDERING THE VALUE OF DR MCDUFFEE'S DEDICATION, THE AMOUNT OF WORK THE CITY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM AND THE ACTUAL BENEFIT OF THE WORK TO THE CITY, I WOULD RECOMMMEND THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVE 1 REJECT THE CONDITIONAL DEDICATION PROPOSED BY DR McDUFFEE 2 TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE STREET IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT THIS WOULD CONSIST OF WIDENING OF THE PAVEMENT FRONTING THIS PARCEL TO 32 FEET WITHIN THE CITY'S EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE OF THE PARCEL THIS WILL BRING THE PAVEMENT AREA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT IN FRONT OF FOREST CITY DILLON, BOTH PHASES I AND II THIS IMPROVEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE PROVISION OF TWO DRIVING LANES 3 SHOULD COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THIS PROJECT, IT WILL ALSO REQUIRE AN APPROPRIATION OF $14,000 FROM THE STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TS bt 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace :alp is 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore 3arbara Pfennighausen Jim Smgley - 6ene Carlstrom Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager W 0 12-5 2451 TO Thomas Schwab, City Manager FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer (91 DATE April 6, 1989 RE Terry R McDuffee, D V M - Offer of Dedication 11830 Mt Vernon Avenue At the City Council meeting of March 23, 1989, staff was directed to prepare a report regarding the status of dedication on Mt Vernon by Dr McDuffee Attached you will find a letter dated February 23, 1987 to Dr McDuffee making an offer to install the improvements as consideration for dedication On March 24, 1989, Dr McDuffee delivered a letter to our office accepting the offer (copy attached) In his letter Dr McDuffee sets out four conditions as consideration for dedication The conditions as set forth by Dr McDuffee would complete the improvements along the frontage of his property to the standard that exists along the Forest City Dillon Development, except for the wall with wrought iron perimeter fencing The costs associated with the improvements as requested by Dr McDuffee is estimated at $39,200 00 The property to be dedicated is 1,472 square feet, at an estimated cost of $2 00 per square foot, valued at $2,944 00 Within the existing right-of-way, without any additional dedication (exist right-of-way 33' for 115 frontage and 43 feet for 206 36 foot frontage), City could construct full two lanes for traffic and pave a shoulder for pedestrian traffic There is insufficient right-of-way to perform construction of curb at 32 feet from street centerline, since it would have 6" behind the curb for the grade transition and actual construction This would require removal of trees, shrubs, and fences along the frontage of Dr McDuffee's property However, all those trees and shrubs are within the existing 33 feet of right-of-way The cost for this alternative is approximately $12,000 to $14,000 If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me 3 TOTAL AREA OF DEDICATION Frontage Width 206 36 X 1 = 206 36 115 00 X 11 = 1,265 00 -------------- 321 1 f 1,471 36 Total Area - 1,471 36 s f Estimated Cost - Land @ $2 00/s f = $2,942 72 Title Report 300 00 $3,242 72 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Curb and Gutter 321 1 f @ 10 00 $ 3,210 00 Sidewalk 321 x 5 5 1,765 5 s f @ 4 00 7,062 00 Driveway 3 ea 20 x 12 x 3 = 720 s f @ 4 00 2,880 00 Clearing and grubbing L S @ $1,000 00 1,000 00 Grading and Excavation 1,000 00 1,000 00 Retaining wall 50 1 f @ 5 00 2,500 00 Paving 6 x 321 = 1,926 s f @ 1 00 1,926 00 Base 1,926 s f @ 1 00 1,926 00 A/C Overlay 15 x 321 = 4,815 s f @ 75 3,611 25 Landscaping L S $2,500 00 2,500 00 Street Lighting 2 ea @ 750 00 1,500 00 Drainage Facilities L S 5,000 5,000 00 $34,115 25 Engineering 5,000 00 Construction Engineering $39,115 25 March 22, 1989 Mr. Joseph Kicak '22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA. 92324-5295 Dear Mr Kicak, ,r 12 S This letter is in response to your request of February 23, 1987, that we dedicate eleven frontage feet along our Mt. Vernon property, to allow the City of Grand Terrace to widen Mt Vernon Avenue. After consideration of the proposal, we agree to make the dedication sub3ect to the following conditions 1. All curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, lighting, drainage structures, and other improvements that will be required for the future development of the property, be installed by the City of Grand Terrace and at no expense to us 2. We are provided the existing three entrances onto Mt. Vernon Avenue. 3. The City of Grand Terrace agrees not to charge back the cost of said improvements against the present or future owners of the property. 4. Three weeks notice be given before the start of said improvements Sincerely, Terry R McDuffee, D.V.M. TRM cdm 'r } February 23, 1987 Dr. & Mrs. Terrell R. McDuffee 11830 Mt. Vernon Ave Grand Terrace, Ca 92324 Dear Dr. & Mrs. McDuffee: HUGH J GRANT Mayor BYRON MATTESON Mayor Pro Tom Council Members TONY PETTA DENNIS L EVANS BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN SETH ARMSTEAD Oty Manager Parcel No. 275-251-08 W 0. No. 12-05.2451 City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has directed the staff to contact you regarding Mt Vernon Avenue widening along the frontage of your property. In order to widen Mt Vernon along the frontage of your property, dedication of additional 11 feet for street right-of-way would be required As consideration for dedication of the 11 feet, the City would be willing to install or have installed the public improvements along the frontage of your �- property. Please advise if such proposal would be considered by you. If so, we would prepare a grant deed and forwarded to you for your consideration. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me. Jry tr y yours, SEA KICAK •dlk : Tom Schwab, Acting City Manager Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney - 22795 BARTON ROAD Civic Center — (714) 824 6621 GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 Planning — Engineering — (714) 825-3825 SCALE 1, 1 ,300' GRAND—�� w 1L SBE 145 36 25A +. wo Q (PAR 2) +Y'� 25 a+,�' of / Q 6 �K ti ,;.� 215 251-15 I10Ac 4.117 2G 05 ,c� �10 4_ II3& 5I TO 4 / Z755 aQ `1\ y�'� 2275.25124 //7/2 $ `\ (480) 93k bq I 'C of is W Lt1 F W / j �P Zl'S 251 Z3 G , 632 Ac i 110 N Z75 2031-4 (40) 107Ac 70103 (+P 991 4.109 4 275 E5i G DC ? Ab s �\ 4-104 300 70 G' 11 Z75 E5) 7 ® t Q9 4` 80135 _ - G5011 z' 2 4 107 /'�' - 275 251 8- ®4_106 -/gGB� u,5)��? 375Ac O; 215 251 54 W �l (bI2 ZO TO ti MAc JJJ rlo� �f�� Sp /f 4_103 ®4_105-�2223 v �/ Us251_3 3 r i Z15 251 53 J�� 995Ac 20Ac ® a 1" 715 Z51 45 ST IBAc C40) (I450) R07 P L50) 5 UD //9/4 u34a) r G GtZ 5L9 7 0 ? �t 16 T) 4_101 $ - 4- 4 084 E75 251 37 M to (I rg E75 MI GI LM 161 38 40 Ac T 9y X 952Ac $ 115Ac G //993 275 s7 I 40 295. 4 �5 P 1705 Z5L41 iD� o J �'� • IDS� /2000 11 4 09Z $ Z75 25Lf0 I3 �p `c/ 4_!00 - I VS 259847 r I GBAe 22*.p,* 27519 57 10SAc 1w r 240.49 on4 085 121Ac -097 Me ` L6,_ - Z7525LO o Z75 I5L55 3 77 Ac I3L LI4 51 100 \ �� 75t �,�I Z75 251 GG G 1106 2 'S CIk1 N 4-OW ZPJ M VY-A c Iwo '2 303 223a/� 12 15) zz47 To 0 275 2042� 71 `~ � (IN) � ^ 4_22404 066 Z7515IJS 0 2309 Me � 2¢-0 ZIS 25L = 1 � 6t75 295 Ac °R � `�' I75 25L62 _ �k Og P _ ©6 4 Ac �N 96A '-4 .� - Om 95 50 CIOTG 695 (75) 6 E15 2 15 LD b I a 058