Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
08/24/1989
22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace =$ California 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Gene Carlstrom Barbara Pfenmghausen Jim Smgley Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager FILE COPY August 24, 1989 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursdays — 6 00 p.m. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS August 24, 1989 GRAND —TERRACE CIVIC_CENTER 6 00 P M 22795 Barton Road Call to Order - * Invocation - Dr William Webber, Grand View Baptist Church * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 Approval of 8/10/89 Minutes Approve 2 Approval of Check Register No 082489 Approve DJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1 Items to Delete 2 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion Approve A Approve Check Register No. 082489 B Ratify 8/24/89 CRA Action C Waive full reading of ordinances on agenda D Rejection of Liability Claim 89-03 Reject (Esquivel) COUNCIL AGENDA 08/24/89 - Page 2 of 2 3 PUBLIC COMMENT 4 ORAL REPORTS A COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 Parks & Recreation Committee (a) Appointment of Catherine L Leogrande - (b) Minutes of 6/5/89 B COUNCIL REPORTS 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 30 P M 0 17 A TTM 88-3 (Siglund) B Z-89-2 Zoning NEW BUSINESS A Amend Sewer Fee Portion of Fee Ordinance B. Authorization of overtime for weekend staffing (for removal of illegal signs) C SA-89-2 (Clark) CLOSED SESSION ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 AT 6 00 P M ---------------------------------------------- AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 09/14/89 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 09/07/89 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Appoint Approve Approve Authorize COUNCIL ACTION ZA AP j'7AL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 10, 1989 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 10, 1989, at 6 05 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Chairman Hugh J. Grant, Vice -Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT Juanita Brown, Secretary David Sawyer, Community Development Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer APPROVAL OF JULY 13, 1989 CRA MINUTES CRA-89-23 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve July 13, 1989 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. 072789 CRA-89-24 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register No. 072789. Council went into Closed Session to discuss potential real estate negotiations. Mayor Matteson reported that no decisions were made. Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 10 p.m. until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, August 24, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF G �D TERRACE DATE AUGUST 24, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO CRA 082489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF _ AUGUST 24, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AmniiNT 20362 GENE CARLSTROM 20372 HUGH GRAND 20380 BYRON MATTESON 20388 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN 20398 SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 20401 JAMES SINGLEY STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 PASS -THROUGH, INCREMENTAL TAX FOR F/Y 88/89, REVISED G T COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 $ 150 00 150 00 150 00 150 00 29,093 44 icn nn TOTAL $29,843 44 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER c. z 0 CITY OF GI ) TERRACE DATE AUGUST 24, 1989 PE",1JlING CITY COUNCIL ArTR ?VAL CHECK REGISTER NO 082489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUGUST 24, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMni;NT P6299 RED BARON PIZZA P6300 AMP SHOP P6301 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6302 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6303 HOME DEPOT P6304 RANDALL ANSTINE P6305 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6306 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6307 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN P6308 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6309 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6310 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6311 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6312 SWEET NOTHINGS FROZEN YOGURT P6313 SOUTAR'S P6314 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6315 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY �= P6316 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION 20352 L J SNOW COMPANY r 20353 CHAPMAN & SOWERS 20354 TERRACE PLACE 20355 ELSE NELSON v 20356 DECK KIM �20357 PATRICK ABBOTT PIZZA FOR SUMMER FUN $ 98 06 REPAIR VIDEO PLAYER 40 50 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/3/89 556 49 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/3/89 72 49 WHEELBARROWS 75 72 TUNE-UP CITY TRUCK 108 13 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/8/89 240 81 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/8/89 73 12 CLEAN RESTROOMS AT PARK (8 DAYS) 160 00 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/11/89 191 23 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/11/89 10 35 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/15/89 222 38 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/15/89 46 19 YOUGURT, SUMMER FUN 40 00 DODGE VAN, RECREATION 11,426 80 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/16/89 210 96 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/16/89 72 84 OVERLAY STREETS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, PATCH STREETS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, AND SEAL COAT PARKING LOT, CIVIC CENTER 27,735 82 FORD STAKEBED TRUCK 16,774 50 UTILITIES, PICO PARK, (1 YEAR) 1,093 30 REFUND FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 768 00 REFUND FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 13 60 REFUND FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 8 50 REFUND FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 8 50 CITY OF G D TERRACE DATE - AUGUST 24, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 082489 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR _ OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUGUST 24, 1989 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20358 ROBERT KEITH REFUND FOR WASTE WATER DISPOSAL $ 9 07 20359 SANDRA AH SUE LOCAL MILEAGE 57 75 20360 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER FOR CIVIC CENTER, 8/3/89 44 80 20361 CALIFORNIA SKATE-G T SKATING FOR SUMMER FUN 84 00 20362 GENE CARLSTROM STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 30 15 20363 CHECKWRITER SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE ON CHECKWRITER, 1989/90 147 40 20364 CITY OF COLTON WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR AUGUST, 1989 28,437 50 20365 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL EXCURSION, KNOTT'S BERRY FARM 335 20 20366 COMPUADD CORPORATION PC AND PRINTER 2,242 46 20367 COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS EXTRA COPIES ON PANASONIC COPIER 61 66 20368 THE CONSELING TEAM COUNSELING, 6/89, RECREATION 950 00 20369 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARK 39 20 20370 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION EXPRESS MAIL 15 00 20371 FLOWERS BY YVONNE FLOWERS FOR GRAISON AND MICHOWSKI 60 95 20372 HUGH GRANT STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 150 00 20373 HEALTH NET MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 2,931 79 20374 HOLDEN PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL FOR COMMUNITY CENTER, JULY, 1989 22 00 20375 HOUSTON HARRIS INSPECTION, SEWER LINES VAN BUREN 500 00 20376 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SVCS LIFE INSURANCE SEPTEMBER, 1989 97 75 20377 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE ON TYPEWRITERS, COPIER, AND OLYMPIAS F/Y 88/89 1,028 00 20378 MASTER LEASE CORPORATION LEASE PANASONIC COPIER, SEPTEMBER, 1989 556 15 20379 MAUSEN FIRST AID/SAFETY CO BREAK APART POLE STRETCHERS, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 635 85 20380 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 150 00 20381 PACIFIC BELL PHONES FOR DAY CARE, PAY PHONES, CIVIC CENTER, COMPUTER MODEM, AND FAX MACHINE 150 69 2 CITY OF ( ID TERRACE DATE AUGUST 24, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 082489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUGUST 24, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20382 PADDEN COMPANY 20383 THE PETRA COMPANIES 20384 CORINNE PETTIT 20385 PERRY'S STATIONARY/OFFICE SUPPLY 20386 PETTY CASH 20387 PETTY CASH 20388 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN 20389 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY 20390 ADRIAN REYNOSA 20391 RIVERSIDE BLUPRINT 20392 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO 20393 RIVERSIDE LAWN & GARDEN 20394 JOHN ROBERTS 20395 S K COMPANY 20396 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 20397 SHERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL 20399 THOMAS SCHWAB 20400 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC 20401 JAMES SINGLEY 20402 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY 20403 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY LEASE MAILING MACHINE AND OLYPIA FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 FLYERS FOR THE COUNTRY FAIR REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE GENERAL PETTY CASH REIMBURSE GENERAL PETTY CASH STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 AD FOR INTERN, PLANNING SCOREKEEPER, 7/20-7/30/89, SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL RECORDING MAPS REPLACE 50% OF CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER, ARLISS/MINONA REPAIR CHAINSAW PARKLAND PAYMENT, G T ROAD, SEPTEMBER, 1989 STREET SWEEPING FOR JULY, 1989 SIGNS FOR STREETS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 PUBLICATION OF BROWN ACT, SCJPI MEETING, LC C CONFERENCE, MEETING WITH DEVELOPERS, AND GENERAL PLAN MEETING SIGNAL MAINTENANCE FOR JULY, 1989 STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1989 ELECTRIC FOR CITY BUILDINGS, CIVIC CENTER, TWO LIGHTS AT PARK ON DE BERRY, ONE LIGHT AT PARK ON PICO, BARTON/PALM, TWO SIGNALS, AND STREET LIGHTS GAS FOR CITY BUILDINGS AND CIVIC CENTER 179 17 137 35 30 00 82 79 363 19 36 24 150 00 61 44 157 50 13 10 1,000 00 100 00 6,871 76 1,218 00 97 31 65,799 00 118 75 236 01 150 00 6,622 83 99 99 3 CITY OF C D TERRACE DATE AUGUST 24, 1989 CHECK REGISTER NO 082489 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUGUST 24, 1989 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20404 THE SUN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND AD FOR PLANNING SECRETARY $ 502 40 20405 SUVERKRUP LUMBER COMPANY SKYLIGHTS FOR RESTROOMS AT DE BERRY PARK 294 15 20406 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS UMPIRES, 6/1-6/15/89, SLO-PITCH SOFT BALL 135 00 20407 UNOCAL FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT 112 67 20408 LOMA LINDA QUICK PRINT LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES, AND BUSINESS CARDS 615 75 20409 VISA AUDIO TAPES, C E P 0 CONFERENCE AND SEMINAR IN MONTEREY 2,918 73 20410 WEST-COMPUTIL CORPORATION PROCESS PARKING CITATIONS, DUNE, 1989 2 10 20411 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CALIFORNIA CODE UPDATES 45 40 TOTAL $186,936 29 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR 4 DATE Aug 17, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Aug 24, 1989 SUBJECT REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC 89-03 '(_-_? FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Staff has received GTLC 89-03 (attached) in which an individual claims that, as a result of painting operations performed on Main Street, her vehicle was allegedly hit with paint overspray Should it be determined that there was liability in this matter, it will be the responsibility of our sub -contractor STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL REJECT CLAIM GTLC 89-03 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO REFER THE CLAIM TO OUR CLAIMS ADUSTOR AND TO NOTIFY THE CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION TAKEN TS bt Attachment M NCIL AGSNDA ITEM x )_ D MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Schwab, City Manager DATE: 8/9/89 FROM: Randy Anstine, Assist. City Manager SUBJECT: Claim of Diocelina Esquivel I have taken the opportunity to inspect all of Main Street, where our painting operations took place Based upon the description provided by Ms Esquivel, I found no evidence of any over -spray and/or splattered traffic paint If in fact this did occur as she described, evidence of the paint would still be present According to invoices submitted by our painting contractor, I have determined that they could have been in the suspected area on or about February 20, 1989 My recommendation would be to reject the claim for the following reasons 1 The spray nozzles of the paint gun only spray a maximum 4" width Nozzles have to point down in order to paint the traffic line 2 The type of traffic paint used can quite easily be removed from traditional auto baked on enamel paint 3 The paint contractor denies that any such occurrence took place I shall leave the claim in your hands for action If you require any additional information, just call A-X/ �, 4x 1 IINX � fir n ko� 1 yt T- ,�� 7/X �f'�� - -"'Si 7 jQ'ac ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS "autton - ®o ® ® DAIHATSU CJ MOT FORMERLY OR COMPANY GRMERLY RUBIDOLIX MOTOR CO EST 1936 TRUCKS OLDSMOBILE 8201 AUTO DRIVE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92504 (714) 687 2020 19 (/-,4, NAME ADDRESS �� I PHONE DATE __2 YEAR MAKE �y r�t MODEL LICENSE MILEAGE MOTOR NO SERIAL NO INSURANCE CARRIER ADJUSTER PHONE CAR LOCATED AT m U - _ N LABOR PARTS AND cc CAR LOCATED AT IN HRS LABOR MATERIAL N TBAND ILIST PRICE PAINT MATERIAL mmm ■■M -■- .eIN OEM �INIM �ME! • �EM! ■- -.- �EM MEN • .■- ��IN n 11, cam~ Tif% r I AUTHORIZE DUTTON MOTOR CO TO REPAIR VEHICLE ACCORDING TO REPAIR COST AS ITEMIZED INSUREDS SIGNATURE INSURED PAYS $ INS CO PAYS $ R O No INS CHECK PAYABLE TO The above Is an estimate based on our Inspection, and does not cover addF tlonal parts or labor which may be required after the work has been opened Up Occasionally after work has started worn /broken or damaged parts are discovered which are not evident o-n fast Inspecfion Quotations on parts and labor are current and subject to ch�nge EST MADE BY 1 II 1 it --) P- TOTALS _ O! i�J/� ✓� G�'�� % �7` Y� ��Tci WRECKER SERVICE r TOTAL OF ESTIMATE OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 14th FLOOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 LEMON STREET RIVERSIDE CA 92501 3655 (714) 787 2717 NOTICE OF REJECTION OF CLAIM BY OPERATION OF LAW To Claimant Diocelina Esquivel 2226 Fifth St Riverside, CA 92507 D/L February 20, 1989 Claim No 15889 GERALD A MALONI CLERK OF THE BOARD NANCY J ROMER( ASSISTANT CLERK OF THE BC BONITA L NADLER RECORDS MANAGER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the claim which you have presented on April 3, 1989, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, was rejected by operation of law on May 18, 1989 WARNING Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim See Government Code Section 945 6 You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter If you desire to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately Gerald A Maloney, Clerk of said Board By QajL]a:� Deborah Fernandes, Deputy �_ I declare that my business address is 14th Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, that I am a citizen of the United States, employed in the County of Riverside, am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the cause, that on the date hereof I served the foregoing notice by depositing a copy thereof in the mail at Riverside, California, in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid, addressed to the person(s) named therein as claimant and at the address shown in said notice I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing -is -true and correct Executed at Riverside, California on May 22, 1989 Debora�Ferna�ndes, �eputy No 1 ASV Y; l f /W dwia Ills 7 A r )/6mvzo avulba- �/Vf Mmwmf 7d A/ IVNIAl n y 11V MlMff A&�67WAl r17Y � �6�� f�fG- i,1iluku e/ cl-lxv��- j4A//) -f#�Ml (�'A/%/,�� YrZl� ///*// 2�- Ar- V 1014) 4/(,r ldx�w� Ak, Al 61,�ellM 7�� r4 i /L);W �bi - Sri///Nvi� �i r r Camp IV W 7 *41 � v hi j t -4L, -�11)1111yglml ✓�r`�����ff -I Plh I AV /s- z ",Y�/ : '171111;1101' mmq)g 4v cfll�W ,zr,� Irl(v v C O M M I S S I O N A N D C O M M I T T E E R E P O R T S COUNCIL MEETING DATE August 24, 1989 DATE August 17, 1989 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE Parks & Recreatior Committee SUBJECT Appointment of new member ------------------------------------------------------------------- PROBLEM Facts A committee member vacancy exists due to resignation of Dick Rollins Catherine L Leo grande has applied for membership (see attached application) At its August 7, 1989 meeting, the committee met with the applicant and voted unanimously to recommend appointment by the City Council ALTERNATI,YES N/A SOLUTION Recommend appointment by City Council REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF Appoint Catherine L Leogrande to the Parks & Recreation Committee with term ending 6/30/90 CO OW,) L A,,,F.fi4,7h i rz_�n -- q/-1 (n CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE aS A MEMBER OF - _---- - - ! '1AM E DD1 ,S /Z 833 a, --a r aY, �l &A ('4 'OME PHONE -]/y y.z D BUSINESS PHONE 'CCUPATION M-r-4rK�E�-. -DUCATION (List highest year completed and all degrees) / ! re there any workday evenings you cou]4�dt meet? Yes ( ) No (x) If so, e I l Is t A-,5-nJ- h'hy are you interested in this position YK 9-1� 11 C k'1-1 r�-' 9-, H Z4 - �,ha� do you Cons der to be your major qualiflCdtin5 REFERENCES I /InA L, Al ,-I+-'. 1 o S f- //,/- 7/U--7,-?z- p� C-k-J-t to-7/ V - dS ease attach a Britten statement containing any additional information you feel would ,e useful to the City Council ( ( ' '` �_Y� 'eUSS CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Park and Recreation Committee Meeting Mon day June 5, 1989 MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT Dick Weeks, Chairman, Marcia Johansen, secretary, Mike Breckenridge, Sylvia Robles, CITY Staff Karen Martinez GUESTS Dick Rollins The meeting was called to order at 7 05 p m followed by the pledge of allegence Minutes of the May 1, 1989 meeting were approved as corrected to read"Sylvia Robles will meet with not did meet with the Colton teens and that the youth scholarship awards were subject to availability of money" Youth scholarships are to be presented at 6 00 p m Thursday June 8, 1989 The first two selected will receive $. each to go to school The other two were sent a letter S6,-V,' 97V s1 6 S Staff report Phantom of the opera is sold out Brochures are to go out later this week Tour de Terrace $1,000 has been committed from the community $200 has been received A 1/4 page ad is to be placed in CA Bicyclist, fliers are to be sent to the Jr and Sr High Schools Bike shops and local businesses The Committee is to participate Expenditures through May 1989 are $4,000 of the $10,000 Recreational survey funds of $600 are remaining CPRS has added Senior Citizen affairs to their program Dick Rollins reported that trash was left after the Safety Fair The Little League is to be charged for extra Loma Linda Disposal pick up of park waste Meeting was adjourned at 7 50 p m Respectfully submitted, Marcia L Johasnen V-JURCIL AGQQA JTD; T V /111 i ib> M S T A F F R E P O R T DATE: 8-15-89 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: 8-24-89 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT: TTM-88-3, An application to subdivide 1.9 acres into five single family lots (see Exhibit A to Attachment A) '? FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X APPLICANT: Sigland and Associates LOCATION: 12394 Michigan Avenue (APN # 277-091-06) BACKGROUND: On October 24, 1988 the Planning Department accepted an application from Sigland and Associates for a seven lot subdivision and proposed variance to be located at 12394 Michigan Street The application along with an application for several variances for lot width and depths was approved by the Planning Commission The Planning Commission's decision on the variances was subsequently appealed and denied by the City Council at which time the applicant requested the map be continued (which it was). The applicant has now revised the map to eliminate the variances and reduced the number of lots from seven to five with only four of the proposed lots located ad]acent to the ad3oining commercially zoned property. The subject property contains approximately 1.9 acres (84,651 sq. ft ), is currently zoned R-1 and designated as Low Density Residential in the City's General Plan. The size of the lots range from 9,800 sq. ft. to 18,240 sq. ft.. It is presently developed with a single family residence and three accessory structures. All of the existing structures are to be removed under the current proposal. ZONING AND LANDUSE: The surrounding zoning and existing landuses are as follows, 0 0 r f -;n y' iaE Property GP Zoning Land Use Subject Property LDR R-1 S i n g l e Family Residence To the West GC C2 L i g h t Industrial To the East LDR R-1 S i n g l e Family Residence To the North LDR R-1 Single Family Residential To the South GC C2 Vacant ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A negative declaration has been prepared for this project and is attached as Exhibit B to Attachment A. DISCUSSION: REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: The following responses have been received from the City's Reviewing Agencies: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY The Edison Company did not respond on this project. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The State Department of Transportation indicated they had no specific comments on this project. COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The School District had no objections to this project. FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT The Fire Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated October 5, 1988 and attached as Exhibit D to Attachment A RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY The Water Company indicated they will be able to provide the required fireflow and had no other comments. ENGINEERING/BUILDING & SAFETY The Engineering/Building & Safety Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated October 28, 1988 and attached as Exhibit C to Attachment A. These comments address the issues of public improvements, grading and drainage facilities, and utility hookups. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TTM-88-3: The Planning Department recommends the following conditions of --approval, 1. An overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board. Such program shall include but not be limited to: * Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of individual homes; * Location of buildable pads for each individual lot, and * Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements 2. Appropriate CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. Said CC&Rs shall include the approved design program required in Condition No. 1 and shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. 3. All the conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building & Safety in their Memorandum dated $ October 28, 1988, attached as Exhibit C to Attachment A. 4. All the conditions as recommended by the Forestry and f Fire Warden Department in their Memorandum dated October r 5, 1988, attached as Exhibit D to Attachment A. RECOMMENDATION: wi { The Planning Department recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving TTM-88-3 and the associated Negative Declaration sub]ect to the conditions contained therein (See Attachment A). Respectfully submitted by David Sawyer, Community Development Director RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TTM- 88-3, AND APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Applicant, Sigland and Associates has applied for approval of a tentative tract map, (Exhibit A) dividing 1.9 acres into 5 lots located at 12394 Michigan Avenue (APN 277-091-06); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this pro3ect per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 7, 1988, begarding this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM- 88-3 and its Negative Declaration to City Council; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on August 24, 1989, regarding these matters. ri NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings are made in relation to TTM-88-3: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration; 5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General t Plan. ATTACHMENT A I 1 r , 6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that: A. The Negative Declaration attached as Exhibit B is hereby approved; B. TTM-88-3 (Exhibit A) is hereby approved subject to the following conditions• 1. An overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board. Such program shall include but not be limited to: a. Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of individual homes; b. Location of buildable pads for each individual lot; and, C. Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements. I v 2. Appropriate CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. Said CC&Rs shall include the approved design program required in Condition No 1 and shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; 3. All conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building & Safety in their Memorandum dated October 28, 1988, attached as Exhibit C; and 4. All the conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their Memorandum dated October 5, 1988, attached as Exhibit D. ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 1989. ATTEST• Deputy Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof M I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Grand Terrace held on the 24th day of August, 1989, by the following vote: - _ -- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN. APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper City Attorney Deputy City Clerk 9E[T 1 OF 1 sEXT ';0, V=�= 0 11., P _fj�� TENTATIVE TRACT • ri THE SOUTH 13Z OF LOT 21 OF THE EAST FUVERME LAND COWANY TRACT W-IL W+4 -; a - t ) i _ _ 1 i f A j —�� SEPT 1967 VICIMTY MAP ` two• 7 OQ 4 MAV{S COURT' } $ }}}\C _ TOP 1 )R TAGGO ...L ..Tt ATM ! NOKaN l! ST AIO VMI SLAM ` "YII 1 /�� ETC4 f a" "a iZs IOfO�j.! Ps- 7Q 0 \)O , N asL ' � .p v a�L M I Ft ' I2T V � 111������ 1 `I� 1 g • I I _� -lC.Y4.._ �— �� � xy t 5 14 I S 2 )i� u P0 I 73O V w PL A 70 I i]..Qp V P E i 910 I L\ C2.0 P.E 84 0 e r u 1 I 1 1 I12T• ` G*x \\ \ \ \ \ 1 � �y ��arry PVRYEYofrs M ' CMl.IM 'CI 2 CALIlCIA 011SOI .30UT lOaM CALIMMIA W M Sa I` • 'wry GENERAL � 1 G� 2® 1 ILL RVD RALTa 'TI..l0-SC sCALIF�IA fait 1 1 t LLCMIA AVC IC. Tl i r 941 IM I. 9t1T. S J I TIC bolo T ICIR T1a. TDITA" T1UC7 a )VT wTII.. I5-31I073 O.A. "T07 12Yo-a1 � y>Tr L zC M i•II VM TO M SOUTH A V"T o C 2 Al0 M MIOIOITT TO M MOIITM a CA.T a M ��yypp1I gyp[ �CilJlO I]na>Lt111�c{p1 -Till C0 CITY . .CCACro''OM 011 � PIIIIA Onm" XAIOL TIVI TClVITV S. ��T I OOL'9111 CIF IIA 12324 TR TLLO'1M JvIi(cLL 1C 0� CO, CCO Ar .. CA .ZW COLTCM CALIFCI 1IA W=4 1 1 EXHIBIT A BYRON R MATTESON Meyer BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tom Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-88-3, a tentative tract map subdividing 1.9 acres into 7 single family lots. This property is located in the City's R-1 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Sigland and Associates LOCATION: 12394 Michigan Street (APN #277-091-06) Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824- 6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to November 28, 1988. All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development Director, City of Grand Terrace. David Sawyer, Community Develop ent Director City of Grand Terrace Date EXHIBIT B NEGATIVE DECLARATION BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tom Counc/1 Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-88-3, a tentative tract map subdividing 1 9 acres into 7 single family lots This property is located in the City's R-1 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation (see attached map) APPLICANT: Szgland and Associates LOCATION: 12394 Michigan Street (APN #277-091-06) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment 17--Dau David Sawyer, Community Develop nt Director City of Grand Terrace , I ri �3= I � , CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1 Name of Proponent City of Grand Terrace 2, Address and Phone Number of Proponent City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention - David Sawyer, Planning Director 3 Date of Envii onmental Assessment 4 Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5 Name of Proposal, if applicable G Location of Proposal II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets ) Yes Maybe No 1 Earth Will the proposal result in a Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? c Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? / V d The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? 41 1 �5 5 C I, Yes Maybe No f Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground / failure, or similar hazards? 2 Air Will the proposal result in a Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b The creation of objectionable odors? ` c Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3 Water Will the proposal result in a Substantial changes ;n currents, or the course or direction of water movements, fresh / in either marine or waters? V b Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d Change in the amount of surface water in body? any water e Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f Alteration of the direction or rate / of flow of ground waters? V � f 4 J ` 1 1 }if Yes Maybe No g Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or ;t excavations? h Substantial reduction In the amount ` " of water otherwise available for public water supplies? VZ ;s i Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? V — 4 Plant Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, J "t,- crops, and aquatic plants)? j� '1 b Reduction of the numbers of any rg unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? Y c Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species h d Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? — `�` 5 Animal Life Will the proposal result in {utr a Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals ri (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthto organisms or insects)? ;' b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ;tk rare or endangered species of animals? l� I`SV 1 c Deterioration to existing fish or �a� wildlife habitat? ki F — 1 ti 41 1 l'6 KRR1l�il N t S7 Yes Maybe No _ G Noise WIII the proposal result In a Increases in existing noise levels? -- t b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7 Light and Glare Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 1 (� N B. Land Use Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal fY 9 Natural Resources Will the proposal -_ result in a Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10 Risk of Upset Will the proposai involve i a A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? l/ 11 Population Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an areal 12 Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? / 13 Transportation/Circulation Will the pro - proposal result in a Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement' I 4� l f ' f r Yes r Maybe No b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new park►ng7 V c Substantial impact upon existing - transportation systems? , / d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? — f Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14 Public Services Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas a Fire protection? b Police protection 7 c Schools 7 d Parks or other recreational faci- lities7 e Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f Other governmental services? 15 Energy Will the proposal result in a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ✓' l b Substantial increase to demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? 16 Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities a Power or natural gas' b Communications systems? c. Water? d Sewer or septic tanks? e Storm water drainage? f Solid waste and disposal? 17 Human Health. Will the proposal result in a Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18 Aesthetics Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19, Recreation, Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20 Cultural Resources a Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical Site? b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? IZ t/ Z 1� I c. I r I I I\ 1 Yes Maybe No d Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact areal 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance al Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one wh-ch oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- lat(vely considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d I Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? N ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation - I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on' the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required 1, , + V Date David Sawyer Planning Dir-ec.tor ignatOur e For City of Grand Terrace i ( r III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 'e 1. b, 3 b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the over covering of a certain percentage of the soil This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department 6 a The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the development of residential uses in an area that is currently vacant This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 8 The existing landuse will change from vacant land to single family residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan STREET �---i --ne BERRY - - a Q O pr Nr A. o /60 /-f l +� u r, se O s�77 to ae �s Port r{ .20 -20 P-1 ♦et 2 . AC AC. � � ® O 3e . 9 :1/L M%L O ©6 59 Sg 3S O © ® 1 ` 02 _ 1 19 AC PAIL ® ? ; m 4 t` L Wn p � 3 � e�'` 1;1 " © 1 t-- 2 4 ,, 21 '+ o If • ZCJ 3 4 6 3 �t C 4 6 3 AL 2 38 AC .1 r.. 7J .0 WL . ,O `t ! ^ - COO' r O „ 1 W 7 /--MAVIS--S-TR�{ T- I ll 1 �1l r 7 j� '11O 1' OZ O3` o 03` Cla` n 7`: tL !1 O rr `c42(D 4 v I/ _r f7 T ON—tRsrnrt- - 37f `� •,r,z 2/ w 9 27 AG) (9 27 A ) O C\i . N 61 72 AC Al/L03 ®u an IIO' 8 75 AC Q O ` a .- ... . -ti o 81: 0 1 72 AC K/L 75 J4C !►(/L U ®,rQ'- ©p Z 52 AC O 20 ,7 r9 U ,a 77 I6 i�o ,s O t4 = pp p _ /00 1 f7r STREET b '- �A►�-��RE�. __ _ rJ N, BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tem Councri Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager TO- David Sawyer, Planning Director W.0 12-1.1054 FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer DATE- October 28, 1988 SUBJECT T T.M 13834 I have reviewed the T.T M 13834 as submitted on October 24, 1988 and recomend following be considered as Conditions of Approval. Engineering Depart Tent 1. Dedicate to provide for Mavis Court right -of --way in the following manner (a) 55 feet wide from Michigan Street westerly to the beginm ng of horizontal curve, approximately 165 feet westerly of Michigan Street centerline. (b) Balance of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated to provide for a smooth horizontal transition to a point 10 feet northerly of the centerline of cul-de-sac with a mini= dedication of 40 feet of right-of-way and that portion of the cul-de-sac southerly of the northerly tract boundary 2. Dedicate the right-of-way necessary to provide for 44 foot half street in Michigan Street along the frontage of subject tract 3. Install curb and gutter - (a) 32 feet from street centerline in Michigan Street (b) 18 feet from street centerline in Mavis Court. (c) Standard radius location in the cul-de-sac 4. Construct standard berm on the northerly side of Mavis Court rn the area where dedication is 40 feet or less, balance of Mavis Court curb and gutter will be required on the northerly side except for cul-de-sac area. EXHIBIT C i ^ Memorandum David Sawyer October 28, 1988 Page 2 5. Construct standard roadway between new curbs or the new curb and berm on Mavis Court 6 Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline on Michigan Street 7. Construct standard sidewalk §, 8 Install ornamental street lights 9 Construct sanitary sewer to serve all parcels. 10 Construct storm drain facilities as required 11 Provide easements for both sanitary sewer and storm drain as may be required 12. Pay off any outstanding bonds for sanitary sewer construction with C S A. 70, Zone H, A D., or make the necessary arrangements to segregate the bond amounts to individual parcels 3. All utilities shall be installed underground 14. Water system shall be designed by owner's Civil Engineer, submitted for approval to following agencies (a) Riverside Highland Water Ccampany. (b) S B. County Envirom ental Health Services (c) Fire Marshall 15 All improvements shall be designed by owner's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City. Building and Safety Department 1. Submit preliminary soils report. 2 Prepare grading plan and submit for review and approval 3. Prepare erosion control plan to be implemented during grading 4. All construction shall conform to various codes adopted by City of Grand Terrace .1 FORESTRY AND FIRE V ARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Flrc Pro'ection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 335 No Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415 0186 (714) 387-4212, 387.4213 I FLOYD TIDWELL, Director lily _ EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 ' 11\A\ _ rr DATE TO MOM §UBJlrT . • • : a• • :: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Planning Dept. GLEN J. NEWMAN County Fire Warden REFERENCE NO. TPM 88-2 APN 277-09-06 FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJICT 0 (XI F1. The above referenced project is protected by the Forestry 3F001 & Fire Warden Dept. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements. 1AE F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No. 106), Development Code, Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California. IXI F3. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of thLee (3) F003 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street JX� F4. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any r04 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint- ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniiorm Fire Code. �FF5. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building 05 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points 1F006 of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code. �L7 F7. Private roadways which exceed one -hundred and fifty (150) in length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%). Where (1) z EXHIBIT D r the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. OI F8. A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six_ -_hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Cbde. ISJ F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading L __9 and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction. IXI F10. All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow 1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor. Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water. The following are minimum requirements for your proposed development. A. System Standards *Fire Flow 1250 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with sprinklered building Duration 2 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 660 Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received. B. Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C. Fire Hydrants Numbers 2 Total (public only) Type 6 Inch w/ 1 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate X Fll. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal- 11 (2) culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of Fbquired Fire Flow." X F12. In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection F 12 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting". A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the m mini a- capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. ��13 F13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. F14. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino 3F014 County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced F15. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required. Req- 15 uirements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department )ue ons and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning Sec, --,i, County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard- Lno, California, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225. Thank you for your coopera- tion. Sincerely, 3Y NANCY BEST Fire Protection Planning Officer !c: Sigland & Associates Riverside -Highland Water Co. 3517 File he following are I I Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments (3) S T A F F R E P O R T DATE: 8-17-89 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: 8-24-89 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT: Z-89-2, Proposal to change Area 8A from R1-10A to R1-20A and eliminating the R1-10 District from Chapters 18.09 and 18.12 of the Municipal Code ,C5 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X DISCUSSION: At the June 8, 1989 meeting, the City Council directed the Planning Department to revise the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map to include an R1-10 District designation in the area identified as Area 8A (see Attachment A's Exhibit A). On July 13, 1989, the City Council directed staff to bring Area 8A back before the Council for reconsideration of the R1-10A District designation. Staff's recommendation for this area remains as it has been t, previously, that is for an R1-20A designation. The requirement for the larger 20,000 square foot minimum lot size is more condusive to the existing pattern of lot divisions in the Area 8A. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinace changing the district designation for Area 8A from R1-10A to R1-20A and removing the R1-10 District designation from Chapters 18.09 and 18.12 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Respectfully Submitted by David Sawyer, Comm ity ueveiopment Director 11; ITTACHMENT A (THE ACTUAL ORDINANCE) WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM THE EXHIBITS REFERRED TO IN THE STAFF REPORT ARE INCLUDED AT THIS `< TIME a r "a- m w r ,F ZONE CHANGE F Z 89-2 R C EXHIBIT A t CHAPTER 18.12 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Sections: 1812 010 Purpose 1812 020 Residential Districts 1812 030 Use Regulations 1812 040 Site Development Standards 1812 050 Off Street Parking 1812 060 Residential Street Parking 1812 070 Signs 18 12 080 F Site and Architectural Review Section 1812 010 Purpose - The residential zones contained in this Chapter are intended to carry out the goals and objectives of the Community's General Plan, with respect to residential uses These goals and objectives are to be achieved through the following purposes established for the residential zones 1 To provide for development in accord with the General Plan 2 To promote the most appropriate and efficient use of the land while providing a variety of housing opportunities to the community 3 To promote a compatible relationship between residential, commercial and other types of landuses located in the community 4 To promote the public health, safety, and welfare through encouraging the appropriate type and size of development for the community ,t ,E 5 To manage development with respect to its type, size and location inorder ` to prevent harmful encroachment of disruptive development into the community's residential neighborhoods Section 18.12.020 Residential Districts: r ' The following districts are designed to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan Each district contains specific landuse regulations and density ranges for development _ 1 RH, Hillside Residential District: This district is intended for very low f density single family residential development with a maximum retention of open space It is located in the portions of the City identified in the General Plan's Master Environmental Analysis as having severe development ,t EXHIBIT B limitations related to topography and soil conditions The maximum density allowed in this district is one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre 2 R1-20, Low Density Single Family Residential District: This district is intended for low density single family residential use The minimum lot size is 20,000 square feet with a maximum density of two (2) dwelling units per gross acre 3 R1-7.2, Single Family Residential District: This district is intended for single family residential use The minimum lot size is 7,200 square feet with a maximum density of five (5) dwelling units per gross acre 4 R2, Low Medium Density Residential District: This district is intended for single family residential use and low density multiple family development The minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet with a maximum density of Nine (9) dwelling units per gross acre 5 R3, Medium Density Residential District: This district is intended for medium density multiple family development The minimum lot size is 12,000 square feet with a maximum density of twelve -plus (12+) dwelling units per gross acre 43 Section 18.12.030 Use Regulations: Uses listed in Table 18 12 030 shall be allowed in one or more of the residential districts as indicated in the columns below each district heading Permitted uses are indicated by the letter "P" while the letter "C" indicates uses which require a conditional use permit Section 18.12.040 Site Development Standards: The site development standards established for each residential district are as shown in Table 18 12 040 Section 18.12.050 Off Street Parking: The provisions of Chapter 18 60 shall apply in determining the number of parking spaces that must be provided for each use located in a residential district Section 18 12.060 Residential Street Parking. The provisions of Chapter 1016 shall apply in all residential districts Section 18.12.070 i s: The provisions of Chapter 18 72 shall apply in all residential districts Section 18.12.080 Site and Architectural Review - The provisions of Chapter 18 48 shall apply in all residential districts m TABLE 18.12.030 Permitted Uses RH R20 R72 R3 USES R2 A. Residential Uses Single Family Units (Detached) P P P P P Single Family Units (Attached) (Duplexes, Triplexes, and Fourplexes consisting of Studios, One (1) and/or Two (2) Bedroom Units Only) - _ _ P P Multiple Family Units (Planned Unit Developments consisting of Studios, One (1) and/or Two (2) Bedroom Units Only) _ _ _ P P Manufactured Housing (As permitted Per Chapter 18.51) - - P Mobile Home Park - - - C C B. Residential Accessory Uses Accessory Structure P P P P P Second Family Unit (As Permitted Per Chapter 18.54) C C C C C i TABLE 18.12.030 Permitted Uses USES RR R2O R72 R2 R3 Guest House Private Garage Private Swimming Pool Home Occupation (As Permitted Per Chapter 5.06) Keeping of Cats and Dogs (Maximum of Two (2) Each) Other Accessory Uses (As Approved by the Planning Director) C. Other Uses Churches (Minimum Three Acre Parcel) Schools (Private and Parochial) Public Park and Playground Public Facilities (And Quasi -Public) C C C C C P P P p P P P P P p P P P P p P P P p P P P P I P C C C C C C C C C C P P P P p C C C C C f« S _ .._-,�R+. e. ^3-- v - , f: '.r'n _ i- �. °'t .. ^ ✓— .- .5 ., :.�' = r-I `-� .. _ j - : t f v u - Cai _ e _ _ TABLE 18.12.030 Permitted Uses USES RE~ R20 972 R2 R3 Day Care Center (With Six (6) or Less Children) P P p P P Day Care Center (With Seven (7) or More Children) C C C C C Residential Care Facility (With Six (6) or Less Patients) P P P P P Residential Care Facility (With Seven (7) or More Patients) C C C C C Utility or Service Facility C C C C C Outdoor Recreation Facility C C C C C D. Temporary Uses Temporary Uses (As Approved by the Planning Director) P P P P P Temporary Trailers (As Approved by the Planning Director) P P p P P TABLE 18.12.040 Site Development Standards DEVELOPMENT ISSUE RH R20 A772 R 2 R3 ,I Area (Minimum square feet) Width (Minimum linear feet) * Interior Lot * Corner Lot Lot Depth (Minimum linear feet) Street Frontage (Minimum linear feet) Setbacks (Minimum linear feet) * Front Yard * Rear Yard * Side Yard - Interior Lot With Driveway Without Driveway - Corner Lot Streetside Not Streetside -a 20,000 7,200 10,000 12,000 -a 100 60 60 60 -a 100 70 70 60 -a 150 100 100 100 -a 50 40 40 40 -a 25b 25b 25b 25b -a 35b 20b 20b 20b -a 10b 10b 10b 10b -a 5b 5b 5b 10b -a 15b 15b 15b is -a 5b 5b 5b 10b :� ;��"s �S�t, yi '�- .:ice � r.. -z � e - •.• `r'.-� � _ � - F -tea: � - ta..l"ram _ .. '.. . � �- _ y - --p T.. ->... _r- .. _ .. . _- -_ _ TABLE 18.12.040 Site Development Standards i DEVELOPMENT iSSUL RK R20 R79 R2 R3 Density (Allowable dwelling units per acre) -a 1-2 1-5 1-9 1-12` Living Area (Minimum square feet) * Single Family -a 1, 350d 1, 350d 1, 350d 1, 350d * Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex and Multiple Family - Studio -a - - 600d 600d - One (1) Bedroom -a - - 800d 800d - Two (2) Bedroom -a - - 1, 000d 1, 000d Height (Maximum linear feet) -a 35e 35e 35e 35e Lot Coverage (Maximum percent) --a 40 50 60f 60f Distance Between Buildings (Minimum linear feet) -a 5 5 20 20 Table 18.12.040 Footnotes a A specific plan shall be required for all proposed projects (including tentative parcel or tract maps) which include any property located within this district. Such a specific plan shall establish site development standards on a project by Table 18.12.040 Footnotes (continued) pro3ect basis in consideration of the existing topography and other physical constraints. The specific plan shall not create a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre and shall be consistant with the City's General Plan. The specific plan may consider a clustered development concept inorder to preserve large areas of open space and minimize the pro3ect's impact on the physical environment. b. The following exceptions apply to front, rear and sideyard requirements as noted- 1) The minimum side and rearyard setback for a patio cover shall be five (5) feet. 2 ) The minimum rearyard setback for an accessory structure shall be ten (10 ) feet. 3) Slopes exceeding five percent (5%) shall be permitted no closer to a residential structure than a distance equal to the required side and rearyard setbacks. 4) In the case of a parcel or tract map, the twentyfive (25) foot front yard setback requirement may range from twentytwo (22) feet to twentyeight (28) feet, with an average of twentyfive (25) feet for all proposed lots. C. 1) A density bonus of up to twenty percent (20%) may be approved with a conditional use permit or specific plan if various off -site improvements which benefit the general public are included in the pro]ect. 2) A density bonus of at least twentyfive percent (25%) shall be approved if the proposed pro]ect meets the requirements of Chapter 4.2 of the California Government Code regarding "Lower" and "Low or Moderate Income Households" dwelling units. Table 18.12.040 Footnotes (Continued) d. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms shall be defined as follows: "Living area" shall be defined as the enclosed area of a residential dwelling unit, excluding porches, patios, carports, garages, storage areas, or auxiliary rooms. "Multiple Family" shall be defined as studio, one (1) or two (2) bedroom units only. e. In the R1-7.2 District, accessory structures shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height unless approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board, and in no case shall exceed twenty (20) feet in height. In the R1-20, R1-10, R2 and R3 Districts accessory structures shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. f. Not more than the permitted percent of the total parcel may be devoted to main and accessory srtuctures, parking areas, driveways and covered patios. The remaining percent of the total parcel shall be devoted to open areas such as landscaping, lawn, outdoor recreational facilities, incitental to residential development, including swimming pools, tennis courts, putting greens, uncovered patios and walkways. Said open areas shall consist of not less than two hundred (200) square feet of open space per dwelling unit Pursuant to the Declaration is the basis that the environment BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tern Council Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager NEGATIVE DECLARATION California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative hereby filed on the below referenced project, on said project will not have a significant effect on DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT An amendment to the Zoning Map which includes the removal of the CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) Overlay Zones, the removal of R-R (Residential Agricultural) and A-1 (Limited Agricultural Residential) Districts, the addition of the R1-40 (Very Low Density Residential), R1-20 (Low Density Residential), R1-7 2 (Single Family Residential) and PF (Public Facilities) Districts and the addition of the AG (Agricultural) Overlay District An amendment to Chapter 18 12 of the Zoning Ordinance which reformats the chapter's text and associated tables A few actual changes are proposed which include a reduction in the allo<,able height of an accessory structure in the R1-7 2 District from ti,enty (20) feet to eight (8) feet and a change of "Temporary Uses (As approved by the Planning Director)" from a conditionally permitted use to a permitted use The only other change is the addition of a twenty-five percent (25%) density bonus provision for projects which meet the State's requirements for a "Lower" or "Low or Moderate Income" projects An amendment to Chapter 18 60 of the Zoning Ordinance which adds several items, including an application section, detailed space per use standards, special regulations for drive-thru facilities, bicycle parking, shared use regulations and regulations regarding the storage of recreational vehicles The proposed amendment also contains detailed design standards for the paving, striping, lighting and landscaping of a parking area and an incentive provision for larger combined projects rather than smaller independent projects APPLICANT The City of Grand Terrace Continued EXHIBIT C r r ,y CITY OF GRAND I ERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT f INII IAL f_NVIRONMI=N rAI_ STUDY I Bac1<Kouncl 1 Name of PI oponenl CIS/ of GI (an(I F c I I (Ice } > Adch ns (Intl Phone Numhel of I'I oponr II l Cily of CAI and I c I r acc 22795 Boi ton Rood, GI and 1 eI race, CA -- 92320-' ')95 _ All( Mimi David c,awyet , I1lanrfinrj Off ec.lor _-----__—_--- 3 D(Itc of C,)",I onlncn Ir11 A ,5c „In(Iil �� — 2 / r-) 11 \gcn(v Pu,mir Ilia A� v—,5 lcnl City —of (,I and 1 ('I I icc 5 I'lamc of Proposal, if appllcalA 7v�-�1 �t�— _ (r\ — _Q�' — ���777 aSkp-LC�5 fa Location nr f ropU idl I0,C C-r _ _— I I Fnvir onmenlal I,opacts (Fxplan(1llons all "yc5" (Intl "nrayhc" an,w(i 5 (fir Ili (WI(jed curl alt'ached sheets ) Yes Moyhe No 1 Earth Vhll the pi opo,al I esulL In a Unstable earth c.ondltlonti or In chances In ecologi(. SLJbSII LI( tLrl cs1 b DISI u,)tlons, displaccrnc Ms c olrlprar ✓ tlon or over covering of the soiII c Substantial change In topography of (11 ouOd surface relief fc(Ilur cs cl Hie deslructlon, covering or modl- flcatdon of any unique gcolocdre. or physical fcatur cs' e Any substantial incr ease in wind or water erosion of soils tither- on or or off site? l� Yes Maybe No f Changes In (IcposlUon or croslon of beach sands, or changes In siltation, deposition or croslon which may modify the channel of a I Iver or sir cam of - the bed of the ocean of any hay, Inlet of Iakel t✓ q Exposul e of people of pt ohef ly to geologic hazal cIS ,uch a5 em lh clllcll<es land,slide5, mucklide,, gi olllld faIIUI (' 01 `,IIII11d1 11c1101 (I',7 ✓ J Air 1,'lll the pl oho5'11 I e"(Ill III o SuhS('nflal all emission, of Clelcrral / a tfo', If ombic n l (III quill lv? v h Tn( = eolfon of ohjec lll�nwhle fJdw ' ✓ C lief F ,clrl of 111 Illr)V(fllelil Illol` lllf e 01 Lei uei LIlllf r 01 ally lit chilw whelhef locally o I((jimmIIy' i Watcl 1', l l the prof>o',al rc5ul l Ill o SUb<<a,)lml c hangc,, In curl enl',, of the C011l S,- 01 chi ection of water Illovclllc Ill ; in CI ' 1 illal Inc 01 If C` h "'cltel i , ID 11,11 (I1,11)Oec, III ell ,lit pholl I cif( 5 ch aint is haltef n, ul the I if(, llld amOUI ' of Sul f,lce I 1-1110W t✓ ( Al lei c L,ollS to If)( ( Ocll c,( 01 HOW of flond walcl s' ✓ Cl Chanc e In the amount Of Suf face w,llel In any water hotly? 1✓ e Dischcll cjc Iillo SIJI fOCC wat(.I `) OI ill any illLei ation of sill face wale) ClIi,iI - lt}/, InCluCllncj, but not limited to temper anrr e, dissolved o> ygen or Wf hl(Ilty? f Al Lei atlon of Lhe dif eclion of r lie of ffov, or ground walcf s7 1✓ Yes Maybe No g Change in the quantity of ground waters, cilhcl LhrOucgh dI1 ect adch- tfons of withdrawals, or through Inter - ccptlon or an aqulfcf by cuts of excavatlons7 h SUbStantwl I eduction In the amount of wate1 othei wise available for pUb11C ,1,1101 ',1lpl")I1es' I-XI)os1,11 e Of pec)ple 01 pi npc 1 1�1 to water 1 elMerl 11a7a1-cll, 1,t1Ch rf, flOOcl- Ina Or t1r1(11 vlov(s 7 f lanl 1.11v ',`Jill the hl oposal rc ,Lill In a C han(Jr Ili Ilse r11vei slty ()f specIr s 01 PU1111)''r of ony 11allve ',pccle, of Idan' (111rltic' cl tl (e,, 111 ul)l, (Jra,<, clnl,,) lnrl ,1(lu,l(i1 plallt5)' 1) kC.d.ICi1 ,11 of the 1)(1111bel `, (,f 'fly UnI(IUc I elf C, r)I CI1(1a11(j( I Cd ',I)M(, of plants' c Introclu-lion Of 1)ew specicr, of plant, into if Area of 11atm- vcyetatfon of In e b,11 rlcr t0 the not mrll replem,,h- Illei,L t)i e/Istmcl ,11ccles) -- ,f SUh,Wi,, dl f edw I Ir)II Ifl ci( I l',lge of am, agI Ic Ultuf (11 c f op ,,nmml Lifc Will Ihr pI np05'l1 I c ,1111 I11 d Change 1n flip- diversity of species, or nurnber s of any spcc_Ics or animals (bI1 ds land anlmal5 including lei) tile,,, fl,h allrl Shellfish henlhlc 01 ydIII,IT) or Ins(,ct,)' b Reduction of the numbers of and, unique fare or endancjcred ;pecle5 of inimals' c De_ler lof ation to (,xl,ling fish or Wildlife hal-)Itdt' LZ Yes Maybe No 6 Noise Will the proposal result (n a Increases in exisl.mg Gorse levels? b Cxposul c of peopic, to severe noise 7 ✓ levels 7 Light ano Glare 11 ill the p( oposal p1 oclufe subslantfal new light of alai e) 1/ 8 L,md Use Will the 1)(OI)o5al I Csult 11) 71 subStaiitlp I Gillet ,)Lion of the pf esenl of planned i<<ld us( of '11) ;11 (o r �� ---- - -- 9 Natui al r,(-SOUI ceo, Will the pi opos,)I result its a Suter, _11111c)I in(( r w e fit the talc, of w,( / r)1 d I 1_),1IUIJI I(cO(II((,) h SU.)> 'IfILI it cicl)Irlioll of any 1`101) I enc d1)1P 1)c11(II ail I ( 5 ),II ( c7 (,✓ 10 Risk of L, set V)'iII tl,( 1)1 u1)o(,,)I involve a n ( is�c of in e., plosion uI the i cle,lse of Ia%a1 dow-, 5u„sta11cc s (, hUr -Of 111111tr'U 1.0 oil ;)e�,licidn c hc, of i jowtimi 1 if. the c void / of Ic( ((Ienl of ronclition,,� V I) Poss, pie fnl(I fet cm e ith 01-1 elncl cJ ellc; r CsPonsc 1)1<111 of (111 Cr11( I C)( Ile ) evaeL E tion pl<ln 7 11 Populatlotl Will the proposal Oiler the location, r-,'i,)tt ihution cicrls(ly, , of gf owth rate of the hUMM) popul,itton cif an at cal' 12 IlouSmcg Will lhr pi Of)o,,,il offe( t exislilrcl hou5111g of create ci demand lot odclilionol / housing" 1✓ 13 Ti ansportation/Cii c(Ilahon Will the pro - proposal result in a Genci ation of substantial aciclitfon,)I vehicular movemc(ll' (✓ ycs Maybc No b Effects on ovlstrng parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking 2 C Substantial lmpa(.t upon existing tr ansporldtron sy5toms7 d Alterations to pi Cscnl lmtlorns of cl1 C(Ilation OI mov(nlcnt of People and/o1 good,, I c Alter,)Llon) IO v„Itol 1)OI nc 1,111 or all tIjff1(7 V f Incl c,ise In 11 Iffl( h,lr,lr (I,, to r,,Olo, VChIcIcc, I)ICyCIISIS 01 pede')tI Iant, 7 (/ 1'I Puhllc SCI VIC(S V,'lll the 1), r)l)OS,Il Il,)V( Sllbstont',II (-{f((I LII)ofI, 01 I(')ull III ,l mid rot n('1' o1 01f(,1 ( d lo-ol Illlll'll1,11 ,CI VI((', III ,Illy Of t►,( follO IM, ,11 a Fll u ')r r)l('( tint,) \/ li Police pi ote( llor) v� C SC'hOo15 d P"I ks 01 OHIC I I C( I e,i I Inn,ll Mc I e MdlnLLII,ln(C Of l)III)11( f,l( 111tIr', Inclu(IInC-j r Od(1 , I f Other oovernm( n l al t,cl VI( ( o 15 Fner gy V/111 thr pl opns,ll 1 et ul l In a USe of subSl,lntlal cmiuiIn15 of fuel of el lc l (I N0 h SubStarlllill Inc r case In (lemand upoll existing soul (r; of once gy , Ol r e- quI1 e the d(Velopmenl of now soul r(,5 ' / of cnC1 Y� 7 16 Utllllles Will the p1 nl)OS,)I resulL in a need for Ilew syslcros, Or sub5lanllal alterations to the following ulllllles r a Powel or natural gas) b CorninunicatIOns cYStC(T)S? c Water 7 d Sewer or septic tanks? e Stol nI watel d1 alnClgc'2 r Solid an(I dlspo,„117 --- 11 I ILill lan 11(',)li1) WIII thc' 1,1 ol)u ,,11 I ("Ault III a Cr (,Ilion of 61I d or I»ten1.1,11 hc',-)Ith hd/,al-d (c' clucJln(J n)e1)t(,1 11c,11 tI-I ) 7 l� f - u', II c of pl: ople to potcnt1d1 Il(',lirf Ill/,Ir ds' 18 Aesthc SIC IV1!I Ih( 1J1 r Sull I tllc UI1IctIoI) FIIII( ,Is(,I oI %/Icy, oto the plrhhc al will the 1),oposaI esult In Ine c_re.,tlun or ,1n aesthcticF, , orrcnslve -,lie Open to 1)(11DlIC /Ie 1 19 Recr utioll Will tl'Ic )I-r)p0',c11 I c;L11t III do Irnp,,c-t . -)n the rIu,Ihty m (1(Iantlty ('r e` is Inc, ecl catlondl oppul it mUr`l)? 10 C.(rlt(II al Rc,om c(-,s a WIII thL l)ropo',,.iI r c ,)ul I In the alter ation or oI the (Iestr uctl(ll of prchlstol Ic of historic ,archaeu- loylc,11 ',1tc' 1) WIII th,_ hr oposal result III <idvcr se phy51(,II of ae , th( tic c rrc( is Lo I pi ehlstol Ic 01 1115tor Ic hullrllncj, sit uctul e, or obJc(�tI c Does the proposal have thr polerltl,ll to cause a physical chcInge �'hlch would affect unique ethnic cultural vcllues7 Yes Maybe No _z v 1✓ Yes Maybe No d Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential Impact at ca7 r/ 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 11 Docs the pr o)ecl have the polcnllol to dcgr tide the cluallly of the envlt on- Hecht, suhslanllally I educe_ the hahltot of a fish or wildlife Specle5, detest a fish or wildlife hopulatiol) In drop below self �,usl,llnlncj levels 1111 c�rlc ii to eliminate d plant of cIIIII. al of eliminate In1po1 tent (X,l1T)l)1C,, or the majot pc1 lod, of Collfol rim hlstol y o1 pt chlslory' V h Doc s the project h,lvc the ootc1111c11 to achieve ,hot l- lei to to the dl,,- ,rdvclulagc of loncl-ter In 011- mcnlal I,joak I (/, shoe t-t(- m I1 ipa( t on the cuvu o nit nt i,, orle ' hlk h oc- cur s In c1 relatively lit Icf , Jeflnttive pcl Iod of emit —h1le long- t(r In Ilnp<1c l Will endue e well Into the (Midi e ) c Doc, the project hive impccts /,hlch ale Individually limited, n(,t c urnu- lr)llvcl) Consider (f1 �)t oicct'S Impact on two oI I1101 ( scl'a, use I CSOUI CeS I11cly IDe I c11,111 VO `,rn(ll l , 1)(11 whet e the crfect of the LUi,ll oc those impacts on the enVI1 onmenl IS significant ) d Does the pr ojecl hive envil onnicldcll effects which will cause 5ul)stan- tlal ad✓er sc effec Is on human heir) elthel till telly or Indil ec ll)' ,/ k ENVI RONMI=NTAI_ DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evalu7tlOn I find that the proposed I)r o)ecl COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and i NICA7IVC DECLARATION! will be pi epar ed ^-- I finch -that alLhoug'i the—pr opo,,e(-1 projcc l could have a sicim ficant effect on the tmvironmcnl, lher c will not be a sicim- fic ant effect in tl s c ase because the mitigotion measur es - dcscr it on alla; reel ,hc els leave hoc n added Lo (ho p( o)c'ct /I NF(-,I, T 11,I ()I-CI-�,PAI ION WWI 1 13L _ PRI-I'AIdf P I find the propos-,, pro)c(-1 M(\Y have a significanI effect oo the envii onmeirl :3,)J an F H V I R 0 W M E N T A L IMPAC f RLI'ORT i5 _ i ec)uii ccl �aLo — D11VIC.I SLIwycr I'lonninq Die-cc.l. ignFi lur c� For Cil,/ of Gi - ii, 1 er r ac (- III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION g In certain areas the l anduses will change from either residential or industrial to commercial and in other areas w) 1 l change from commercial to industrial in accordance with the recently revised General Plan These changes were reviewed and m ,tigated III the Mastei Tnvironmental Analysts for OP-87-4 C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO COUNCIL ITEM �X) DATE 8/17/89 ' Ur►i MEETING DATE August 24, 1989 SUBJECT AMEND ORDINANCE 112, ITEM 17 SEWER USER CHARGES, ESTABLISHING NEW RATES FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL USERS. FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX In June Ordinance 112 was adopted as a new Fee Ordinance At that time staff did not have the new rates established by the City of Colton for commercial/ industrial sewer users The new rate adopted by Colton is $0 39 per 100 cubic feet of water used. Grand Terrace is required to transmit $0.35 per 100 cubic feet for all commercial/industrial users located in our City. Therefore, ITEM 17 - SEWER USER CHARGES of Ordinance 112 needs to be amended to establish the rate for commercial/industrial at $0 415. The additional amount collected by the City would be deposited in the Wastewater Treatment Fund to be used for the general operation of the sewer system within the City and add to the capital improvement sinking fund for future line replacement. The minimum monthly charge for commercial/industrial users would remain the same as for residential uc rs at $8 50 STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AMEND ORDINANCE NO 112 AS AN URGENCY ORDINANCE, ITEM 17 SEWER USER CHARGES, ESTABLISHING NEW RATES FOR COMMERCIAL AND/OR INDUSTRIAL USERS. I:lu or continues, shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense In addition to the penalties provided in this section, the City may recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, court report fees, and other expenses of litigation by appropriate suit against the guilty person ITEM 17 - SEWER USER CHARGES (Municipal Code Title 13, Chapter 13 08) The following sewer user charges have been established A Sewer User Rates 1 Residential users shall be charged the rate of $8 50 per month Each single family dwelling, each dwelling unit in a multiple residential complex (including duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc ) and each dwelling unit in a mobile home park shall be charged at a rate of $8 50 per month 2 Commercial and/or industrial users shall be charged etxey-eevea pe�een-{6�}-e€-the-use-a€-A-3$5 the rate of $0 415 per one hundred cubic feet of water per month or any portion thereof, however, the minimum monthly charge for such users shall be $8 50 per month 3 Each church user shall be charged the rate of $8 50 per month, however, each church -owned property shall be charged at the appropriate use rate as provided herein 4 Individual schools shall be charged a rate of $8 50 per month for each one hundred (100) average daily attendance or portion thereof These amounts shall be computed on the basis of the previous twelve months B Billing - Delinquency Sewer service charges shall be billed on a bimonthly basis in advance of service All such charges will be due and payable on the date of such billing and shall become delinquent thirty (30) days thereafter A collection fee of five dollars ($5 00) shall be charged to a delinquent sewer user for each preceding billing of sewer service charges which has not been paid C Lien Status of Delinquent Charges Any sewer service charges unpaid for a period of six (6) months shall cause a lien to be recorded upon the real property served, except that no such lien shall be created against any publicly owned property In the event a lien is filed for unpaid sewer service charges, a penalty of fifty percent (50%) of the delinquent amount and all accrued collection fees shall be added Once the lien is placed on the real property, the delinquent amount and all penalties shall be added to the tax roll Any continuing delinquent sewer account shall be assessed another fifty percent (50%) penalty for each six month period that account remains delinquent after 13 DATE August 17, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE August 24, 1989 SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION OF OVERTIME FOR WEEKEND STAFFING rj FUNDING REQUIRED x NO FUNDING REQUIRED Staff has been requested to consider the possibility of providing maintenance staff on weekends with emphasis on removal of illegal signs Staff is currently involved with the County in a Weekend Work Release Program which is being staffed by the Assistant City Manager and the Maintenance Leadman Last weekend staff and the weekend workers did remove illegal signs along with other pickup of parkway debris Four loads of dirt, debris and trash were taken to the dump Staff feels that as long as we are involved in the Work Release Program that we can add this task to our work program for the weekends Staff is requesting, however, an additional appropriation of $8,000 per year to provide sufficient overtime funding so that an employee can be available to supervise the work release crew Staff will try to utilize compensatory time rather than overtime when at all possible, but payment of overtime is inevitable if we continue with this program As long as the Work Release Program is available to the City, we can continue to remove illegal signs right along with the other weekend work Staff will request Council to reevaluate the value of weekend staffing should the work release program discontinue STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE $8,000 OVERTIME FOR STAFF TO SUPERVISE THE WORK RELEASE PROGRAM ON THE WEEKENDS COUN)MIL A0�114DA if W, f 6 13 - k 10 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO 6-C SUBJECT SA-89-2 Clark FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED August 24, 1989 The information regardinq SA-89-2 Clark will be provided to you on Tuesday, August 22, 1989