Loading...
09/14/198922795 Barton Road Grand Terrace } { California 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Gene Carlstrom Barbara Pfenmghausen Jim Smgley Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager September 14, 1989 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursdays — 6 00 p in Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 FILE COPY CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 22795 Barton Rd. r � * Call to Order CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA --September 14, 1989 600PM * Invocation - Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Approve Approval of 8 2 89 Minutes 2 Approval of Check Register No 091489 Approve 3 Request to negotiate Development Disposition Agreement (Clark SA-89-2) z ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1 Items to Delete 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation - Drug Use is Life Abuse" Present B Proclamation - "National POW/MIA Recog- Present nition Day" September 15, 1989 C Proclamation - "American Business Women's Present Day" September 22, 1989 D Proclamation - "Constitution Week" Present September 17-23, 1989 E Presentation by Fontana Mayor Nat Simon of proposed regional gang computer system 3 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion COUNCIL AGENDA 09/14/89 - Page 2 of 3 A. Approve Check Register No 091489 B Ratify 09/-14/89- CRA Action C. Waive full reading of ordinances on agenda D Approve Minutes of 08/10/89 08/24/89 08/31/89 E Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Program F Agreement from Wilden Pump G SA-89-2 Negative Declaration (Clark) H Buyback of vacation time - Randy Anstine 4 PUBLIC COMMENT 5 ORAL REPORTS A COMMITTEE REPORTS (1) Parks & Recreation Committee (a) Accept resignation of Barbara Conley (b) Minutes of 8/07/89 (2) Historical & Cultural Committee (a) Minutes of 8/07/89 (3) Crime Prevention Committee (a) Minutes of 6/12/89 (4) Emergency Operations Committee (a) Minutes of 5/15/89 B. COUNCIL REPORTS 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 30 P M A SP-89-1 (Tom Wahl) 7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS A Consideration of Dedication - 11830 Mt Vernon Ave B Sidewalks on Michigan STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Approve Approve Approve Adopt Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA 9/14/89 - Page 3 of 3 C SECOND READING - AN ORDINANCE OF THE `- CITY -COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF -GRAND - TERRACE CHANGING A PORTION OF AREA 8A FROM RI-IOA TO R1-20 8 NEW BUSINESS A Councilmember's appeal of Planning Commissions approval of CUP-89-4 B. Final Parcel Map 10915 (Fox) Discussion of Palm Trees 9 CLOSED SESSION ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL/CRA MEETING WILL BE HELD 9/28/89 AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 9/28/89 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON ON 9/21/89 Staff Recommendations Adopt Council Actionl E.i "L.,, a ("-"111 r%r)i',',i VA CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 24, 1989 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 24, 1989, at 6 05 p.m. PRESENT _ Byron Matteson,__Chairman _ Barbara Pfennighausen, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Vice -Chairman Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager APPROVAL OF AUGUST 10, 1989 CRA MINUTES CRA-89-25 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT ABSENT), to approve August 10, 1989 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. 082489 CRA-89-26 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT ABSENT), to approve Check Register No. 082489. Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 10 p.m. until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, September 14, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace C ,A AC L_ .:.,\ ! 1 EIAI NO. I COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRANS TERRACE P J'vA1, i DATE SEP'_ 3ER 14, 1989 CHECK REL.,,,ER NO CRA091489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF _ SEPTEMBER 31, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT , P6317 Z SANWA BANK OC CALIFORNIA PAYMENT ON CIVIC CENTER OF AUGUST, 1989 TOTAL, I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER i I 1 r $152,0 3 08 $152,0 3 08 STAFF REPORT ptembef '%i��g'_ C R A ITEM (X) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE 9 14 1989 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT Request for Agency participation in expanded public improvements for SA- .�5 89-02 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED DISCUSSION On July 5, 1989, the Site and Architectural Review Board conditionally approved SA-89- 02 Subsequently the applicant has indicated that the SAR Board's conditions of approval are acceptable and they will proceed with the project as conditioned However, both staff and the applicant feel that there exists an opportunity for expanded public improvement of La Crosse Avenue beyond that which is required for this project The applicant, Mr Clark has provided staff a letter stating their position and how they would like to work with the Redevelopment Agency to accomplish an expanded improvement of La Crosse Avenue which will serve as the primary entry point into Grand Terrace for vehicles entering Grand Terrace from southbound I215 (please see Attachment A) The expanded public improvement includes an additional southbound lane on La Crosse Avenue which will provide a separate through traffic lane for traffic wishing to turn left onto Barton road and a separate lane for traffic wishing to turn right into the proposed center or right onto Barton Road The expanded public improvements may also include enhanced entry treatments such as additional landscaping and community signage The expanded improvement of La Crosse Avenue will not only be of benefit to the proposed project but will also benefit the City as awhole by providing a safer environment and an increased capability for handling increased traffic to be generated from future development along Barton Road In the past, the Agency has not become involved with private commercial developments, however, staff feels this project presents an opportunity for the City to enhance the image of the City by improving the aestetics of an important entry point into the City at a cost savings to the City and to increase public safety in the area with as little znconvience to the general public as possible Staff feels this can be accomplished with CRA AcE:r<<JA ITEM NQG an agreement between the developer and the Redevelopment Agency to assure completion of the project as designed and the recovery of the Agency's original costs through increased tax increment revenue RECOMMENDATION -- -- ICU- staff=jt�dofumendatiori -fl at -tlie Cify"-7C�nncil aIfffb ize" `staff- to negoiatey a Development Agreement with the applicant Said agreement shall include improvement plans, a time schedule for completion of said improvements and a detailed cost analysis and financing plan Once completed, said agreement shall be submitted to the Redevelopment Agency for approval Respectfully Submitted, 1J David Sawyer, Community Developer nt Director Jul y .� el , 1989 Mr David Sawyer -i;nII(Il,lCl7 1 y- _j!_eyP� !�}171AePL _TIXnr- {_ter - - _t i t y—of Grand- I E-r race - T '279'J Dart on Read Gr,and I err r•lce, t .a 923'_4 fae I a.CrInL tie street improvements Dear Mr. ;sawyer P O BOX 1866 SAN MARCOS CA USA 92G69 TEL (61,049541 Vz Fer /out- roquesi , I hAve H 3 scUE -ed Further widening of I aCrossm with the traffic-ngineer n that had completed our traffic =_I udy I have alsn obtaaineci some preliminary East i mate= 5 for the wort There are <_,c=vreral options open to us Fresentl y l ,-aCroose Ave as an avnrayu of 02 f L wide in front of the- project According to the traffic Study that width would accommodate the additional traffic of the center Since this is the primary entry into the City, there certainly would be advantages for everyone if that road were widened even further to meet future city-wide growth requirements Thera is r-appro, i matel y So ft between our property and the Cal trans i reeway easement than wonl d be available for widening of LaCrosse lhaL would allow for one tul 1 northbOUlid thru lane plus a northbnuno left taarn lane into the project, as well as two soatthbo"nd lanes and an island separator. the additional southbound lane woolo provide additional capac itv and safety for present and future city traffic_. the LaCro 5se offramp is used as a major artery into the city by all r4sident, as well as cnmmercial users such as Stater Fcrom A , bast only a portion of that traffic will actually be generated by Terrace Gateway„ if Ohm citN decides the e ,tra widoninq is des crabl e, we would thwrefore ast that the additional cost of the e- tra improvements naL be placed or the Terre(e Gateway project Our estimaL-es indirate that Fhm additional widening cnuld more that double the cosL of thuse Originally called for n i he tra f f i r stud) l ho"e or L y 1 no I i mprnVeMP ats were cyst i mated qt laraa,c-�i,c>N W tip the additionAl width, caarhs, and island, Lhere wrical d also be the nerd to undGrground power lines on i he f repw"y side of LnProa.p 1I1P total c.uwL coal d e ceeci A-25 cl M and tnat would bm wbo"1 TI IclM" more than car GaVway pr^o)ect could 1"stif; `1 yam "prH fnr =ug9xFt a011S f f thorn IT somP way fn, Lhe C10 10 tl _aPr i n l patw in Lhesp e t rn c rests , theme should be F'lenly of financ-iar you"Ifi(stion fnr tL9 involvement. Ther fnllnwlncl i5 an any{ i,r- �,f hey rnlp��rl clrHIT """TTAI .HKA KIT A f_ -- ---_ _--- -- - - rLL-vPr1UP cic'neratur for, LI)F' ('ity Gross Sales L: st 1 mad' p for 1 uprar e Gateway p a l o c 1 U r s - - _ - _ - - -- -'_....- __ _ ~-Mon L-h-1-y Est 7 mated Sal es ftuz I ilinq O-Autn Related Retail Auto Parts -- - -__ _ _ __ __ 400(i s 90 , HO0 fir(- c,{ o)-P ______ _ ___ _ _ =()()() s ¢ - -- 8t) 9 (- )OC) Auto Iatereo--__--- - --- Lt)c 0 s f --- L_I ^� 4(JI )o OOci sf --- 45,000 Offroad Ac-cessnrzes --- - 2Ocic) s f„--- 40,0(ici Cel l ul ar ( hones ---- ---- 2()UC) s f -- - 45 qOO(-) Catal ng Auto Sales ------- 11 Oci s f.___ 80 100() otal 191"0 s, f 405,000 Convenience Store and Gas Station--28uo s f ---- 412"7()i)(-) Restaurant--48Oc_) s f „ __ _ __ ___--_-- __-- ----____-- 115O ,c 0 ) Duilding D - Retail, Service CommerciAl Office , Hardware ___ ___ ____-- __-- 6U )t_) s f 1( ) , c go ) Lighting ----------_ ____ 4""" s f.--- 7n,00Ti App l 3 inre --- _-____ _ ___ - 4000 s -f - -- 12c) , (u_)C) Carpet --_ J f _ __ 10i) Stervu/ .1 outrun trs - - - m)o _, f , ---- 90,csOci <;PPc 1 D l Ly Sales s f K - Of+ I( - --- ---- -- ___- -- - 1._d00 5 t - - - (- --- r�tti I dinn C_ - Retail , Service C"mmprc3al OF is t- (If f ire copiers/1 G+ Spec i al ty Furniture -__-- Flo"" s Of f icE Supply ___ _ _-- _-- '5tfU > f I (el i-------__ _-_ - - --- -- L''-c x) r-, f 5()ci0 H"me Decorating ----- - --- qom) s f -- 70„0Q.) Computer Sales -- ---_ ----- "'�U" s f -- - 60 4""ci Other Sales - _ _ _ __ _-- __-- ;,... s O f f i c e ---- -- _ _- ______ --__ y i t n h. f --- loVa1 -0, 300 .F. 1315500() Total AnticipaWd Retail Sale= Der month 11.050 oun Current assessed val up of the e isting land and bull dings is V356 ,773. It is anti c3 pated that the assessed value of the new project would approach 150^ci,t M) 1 hope the informatcon provided gives some indication as to the economic impact of the Terrace Gateway project for the City of Grand Terrace. 1-his impact, coupled with future traffic needs of the L i ty 5 sh"ul d provide some Justification for City involvement in the additional LaCrosse improvemenfc. Flease let me know if you need mor- information Si -rel y; Gary C i r L� , I Z O Q \ m \ w � NOT TO SCALE 15 t l ; r ; 1jt I 1 I �I 1 d lA CRCSSE t lilt q�AToti EXHIBIT 7 'Poo,, ; PROPOSED y ; MODIFICATIO REQu19-E Pctou�r-�s�.c i RIPING �_� � � �� �� o '�- \ -- �o _ n� \� � , �u o� S�-�E Cu �_ � _ —� �`x/�J�.s�F �P �� C �"/y9Y �o _ n� \� � , �u o� S�-�E Cu �_ � _ —� �`x/�J�.s�F �P �� C �"/y9Y i� x �— � -- a t u f a i �� i jf i a M�7 F� �� i (Zc[p�SED ST 21�� 1�- �� e i �� �� ', t CJ �- �V r°�3�E _ r .. �r s• - r � t _ - t _. +t , or all -i tLY 1 4 - 4 "DRUG USE IS LIFE ABUSE" _ WHEREAS, this decade has realized a dramatic increase in the use of illicit drugs in -San Bernardino County, and WHEREAS; _those most dramatically_ affected by this trend are. -'the _ youth of , our communities with the national average age of_ the first-time4-drug user being ~eleven and„ one=half years, and' #I: HEREA`S; efforts 1` 'sto :`combat , , this problem k. a �< require }ah+ combined, commitment `�,f,`rom each , ci'tizen, - pri- or stt a.+e° , s t �� rt""Yt« vate"organ �zat'ion ands public a encty,, so -that a means of �V ��� changirfg the+ way drug use ' -is- perceived_kby society is accompl-ished, and WHEREAS, -the Allied San Bernardino County Law Enforcement Agencies, in recogn'izing�-rz ihist need, has established_a program called "DRUG ;US_E IS'LTFEABUSE, " -, -in which .-�a11 ,'persons, can, par ticipatda,-, ;in_ relentless image='campaign;=that supports"ra drug=free,�l festyle ` 7 NOW, THEREFORE, I, BYRON =YR- 1MATTESON, Mayor of the`tCity- of,, Grand- Terrace, , on 1 ehalf`�of the City - y Council,-- pledges its full support to `the -,','DRUG USE IS K LIFE ABUSE",as1?nogram and , shall---commit_-`itself to its '�tT' +7 I - � ' YA success - ', nLTWil.,drug-free San Bernardino'.County t+ . Y rt s - Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof This 14th day of September, 1989 000000�0� K --SAS&Iff Q. I ti y ~L� *14 Y �� '�'�• tv- �fir`' "NATIONAL POW/MIA RECOGNITION DAY" >Uy September 15, 1989 WHEREAS, America's men and women have heroically served their country in time of conflict ever since the Revolutionary War and in each of J America's wars, our prisoners of war have been required'' sacrifices, servin their county under conditions of hardship, make special g y p, and WHEREAS, Because our POW's and MIA's have earned a very special place in the hearts of all Americans due to their selfless devotion to duty and unflinching courage, we must not forget or fail to honor those who have served their country so faithfully, and -" WHEREAS, our Nation deeply appreciates the acute suffering and pain experienced by the families of our servicemen held captive or missing in action The loss of a loved one is a tragic situation under any circimstance, but that burden is magnified when the fate of the loved one is unknown, and r� WHEREAS, we must accept and remember our obligation to these F��~ missing servicemen and be determined that until the POW/MIA issue is resolved, it will remain a matter of the highest national priority, and WHEREAS, National POW/MIA Recognition Day is the day we should" recognize the special debt all Americans owe to our fellow citizens who r`= gave up their freedom in the service of our country and to the families who�� have undergone a great travail NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand � Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hb�'-' 1989 as hereby proclaim September 15, "NATIONAL POW/MIA RECOGNITION DAY" and call on the residents of the city of Grand Terrace to join in honoring all former American prisoners of war, those still missing, and their -� families who endured the uncommon sacrifices on behalf of this country _ yor o e i o ran errace uCity 1tfothe Council here -- tiF This 14th day of_September, 1989 L~�� 6 A f i1 ( e �ti+-- �- (Eit i of (6ra U. art 1 c�� "AMERICAN BUSINESS WOMEN'S DAY" c September 22, 1989 WHEREAS, approximately 57 million _mot` involved in determining the directions in '�- sectors of this country will move, and WHEREAS, these enterprising positions on all levels of business, and role in the American work force, and working women are integrally which the private and public women hold active, responsible will play an increasingly powerful WHEREAS, the American Business Women's Association, a national educational association of employed women, believes that the enormous effects of today's dynamic, concerned businesswomen deserve recognition --not only the more than 100,000 members of the Association, but all working women, and WHEREAS, women have made an important contribution to building the strength and greatness of the United States and all evidence indicates that the American businesswoman will continue her significant contribution to the progress of our nation, IN contributions NOW, THEREFORE, Terrace, on behalf of the 1989 as "American Business million American businesswomen for their public sectors of this country, I, Byron R Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand City Council, do hereby proclaim September 22, Women's Day" in Grand Terrace, California IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the the City to be affixed at Grand Terrace this 14th day of September, Mayo,V/of thd City _oT Grand Terrace— anV the City Council thereof This 14th day of September, 1989` Ali oel To `1. .\\�G lOf � . k. %S rgr 4V -;wD- 1W i CIL- _1 - I AU 4- "CONSTITUTION WEEK" r - � t w September 17-23, 1989 ==R WHEREAS, Our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings 9 of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States of America and A =-� WHEREAS, It is of the greatest import that all citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to support it, preserve it and defend it against encroachment, and f Yµt WHEREAS, The Bicentennial of the signing of the Constitution,.. provides a historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall `-•� achievements, of our Founders, and to reflect on the rights and privileges of citizenship as well as its attendant responsibilities, and -�' WHEREAS, The independence guaranteed to the American people by the Constitution should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and z� activities during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, as designated ;-== by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in accordance with Public Law 915, y� NOW, THEREFORE, I, BYRON R MATTESON, Mayor of the City of Grand -� Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23, 1989 as3 "CONSTITUTION WEEK" Ij in the City of Grand Terrace, and urge all our citizens to pay specialattention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantage ofAmerican Citizenship.In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed at Grand Terrace this 14th day of the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine and the Independence of the United States of America, the two hundred and thirteenth -- * �` �> e) '$ Mayy of the City of Grand Terrace <'; H and the City Council thereof. -' This 14th day of September, 1989 = �n _ `w r i ji(�Ijl u�E CITY OF GRA"'^ TERRACE DATE SEPI iBER 14, 1989 Ceti`'c-)"'Ij 'i CITY j_ ',PPRO� CHECK REuijTER NO 0914F CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMniiNTI P6318 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6319 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6320 CLARK'S VINYL TOPS P6321 RAGING WATERS P6322 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6323 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6324 LYNELL HARLOW P6325 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SERVICE P6326 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6327 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6328 BARBARA MICHOWSKI P6329 PETTY CASH P6330 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6331 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6332 POSTMASTER-COLTON 'P6333 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO P6334 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6335 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6337 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6338 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P6339 CA CRIME PREVENTION ASSOC '6340 DOMINO'S PIZZA P6341 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/18/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/18/89 WELDING SET RECREATION EXCURSION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/22/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/22/89 INSTRUCTOR, STENCELING REPAIR PBC CONTROLLER AT BALL PARK CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/24/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/24/89 REIMBURSMENT FOR MUFFLER/STAND FOR PRINTER PETTY CASH FOR CHILD CARE CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/89 BULK MAIL, RECREATION BROCHURES WATER FOR PARK ON DEBERRY, MT VERNON/ARLISS, PARK ON G T ROAD, FIRE STATION, BARTON/PALM, CIVIC CENTER, AND MERLE CT PARK I CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/30/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/30/89 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/31/89 ' CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/31/89 SEMINAR, CRIME PREVENTION PIZZA FOR SUMMER FUN CHILDERN CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/5/89 li 4793 2933 2000 3' 1 00 325 38 119 46 6 00 0 64 472 01 318 94 2 34 457 16 537 62 10 23 50 52 3,05� 76 128 93 1 28 1( 35 3 53 11(j) 00 4 25 1,52E 79 �1 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR P6342 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P6343 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 20413 PAM CRONK 20414 CRAIG BLACKERBY 20415 TEODORA KING 20416 DENISE WALBURN 20417 K J THOMPSON 20418 MARIA REYES 20419 LORI ROBINSON 20420 LIONEL ARNOLD 20421 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL 20422 LINDA DUET 20423 MARY ANN PEARSON 20424 REBBECCA 20425 ALECIA RDZAK 20426 DORTHY STALLBERG 20427 WILLIAM FIELDS 20428 JOHN STONEKING 20429 AT&T INFORMATION CENTER 20430 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN 20431 AFTERSCHOOL 20432 AIRKEN 20433 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 20434 RANDALL ANSTINE CITY OF GRANS TERRACE DATE SEPT_ -ER 14, 1989 CHECK REG11_ ER NO OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 DESCRIPTION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/5/89 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1989 REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION BACKFLOW DEVICE FOR CIVIC CENTER EMPLOYEE INJURY REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL RENT PHONE, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER FORMS, RECREATION VIDEO TAPE, RECREATION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP,1989/90, CA CHAPTER AUTO ALLOWANCE, SEPTEMBER, 1989 91489 AMOUNT 415 95 1,77' 74 3() 00 3( 00 11 00 2 00 2 00 2 00 2 00 70 00 13f 00 2 00 00 ic 00 ic 00 20 00 9 07 12 00 4 35 35 15 32 95 46 39 50 00 200 00 CITY OF GRAI,- -ERRACE DATE SEPi`uidER 14, 1989 CHECK REGioiER N,0 i i 091489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20435 BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR DOORS FOR RESTROOMS AT PARK $ 2,315 06 20436 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER FOR CIVIC CENTER AND DAY CARE 168 80 20437 BECKLEY CARDY SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE 396 74 20438 CA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS TAX ASSOC MEMBERSHIP FOR 1989/1990 40 00 20439 CA PARKS/RECREATION SOCIETY MEMBERSHIP FOR 1989/1990 90 00 20440 CALIFORNIA SKATE-G T SKATING FOR SUMMER FUN CHILDERN 68 00 20441 STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRANS ENERGY/MAINTENANCE FOR LIGHTS AT BARTON/215, JULY, 1989 603 73 20442 CAREER DYNAMICS ABSENTEE CALENDARS 27 21 20443 AMY CARTER BABYSITTER FOR LOW IMPACT AEROBICS 8 50 20444 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEAN RESTROOMS AT PARK (8 DAYS) 16D 00 20445 CHEMLAWN FERTILIZATION OF PARKS AUGUST, 1989 873 00 20446 COMMONWEALTH TOY/NOVELTY CO MC GRUFF DOLLS 227 95 20447 CITY OF COLTON WASTE WATER SERVICES FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 AND ONE CONNECTION IN AUGUST, 1989 31,31 28 20448 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR SAFETY FAIR 18 00 20449 DEMCO SUPPLY, INC WORK STATION FOR COMPUTER 78 58 20450 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP PAINT FOR CITY BULDINGS 28 48 20451 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 60 58 20452 EXPERT TREE SERVICE REMOVE TREE ON ORIOLE 580 00 20453 G T MAILERS PICK-UP MAIL FOR CIVIC CENTER, JULY, 1989 2E 00 20454 HONEYWELL, INC MAINTENANCE ON HVAC FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989, CIVIC CENTER 1,04. 00 20455 HYDREX PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL FOR CIVIC CENTER, AUGUST, 1989 4E 00 20456 INMARK RUBBER STAMPS, NAME STRIPS, AND BADGES 184, 39 20457 INTERNATIONAL MAILING SYSTEMS RENT POSTAGE METER FOR 7/5-10/4/89 g 38 20458 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 7/24-8/20/89 18,071 35 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE SE 4BER 14, 1989 CHECK RE TER NO 091489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20459 KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 20460 LAWNMOWER CENTER REPAIR LAWN MOWER AND CHAIN SAW 20461 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS LONG DISTANCE PHONE 20462 MINUTE MAN PRESS FLYERS/NEWSLETTERS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS 20463 NCR CORPORATION SOFTWARE SUPPORT, COMPUTERS, SEPTEMBER, 1989 20464 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 ' 20465 PHIL PAGE I OPEN/CLOSE PARK FOR JULY, 1989 20466 PACIFIC BELL PHONE, SENIOR CITIZENS, CIVIC CENTER, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER, AND DAY CARE 20467 PAGENET NEW PAGER AND AIR TIME/MAINTENANCE ON PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 20468 PATTON SALES CORP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 20469 THE PETRA COMPANIES FALL BROCHURES, RECREATION AND REGISTRATION FORMS 20470 PETTY CASH GENERAL PETTY CASH REIMBURSMENT 20471 PETTY CASH GENERAL PETTY CASH REIMBURSMENT 20472 RIVEPSIDE COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKER AND INSTALL RADIO, CIVIC CENTER 20473 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DUMPING CHARGES FOR 7/18-8/15/89 20474 DAVID SAWYER AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 20475 THOMAS SCHWAB AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 20476 SO CA CITY CLERKS ASSOC GENERAL MEETING REGISTRATION 20477 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRIC FOR BALL PARK LIGHTS, SIGNAL, AND SPRINKLERS AT PARK ON DE BERRY 20478 SO CA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE, 1989/90, FINAL PAYMENT; 20479 THE SUN AD, RECREATION TEACHER 20480 SUNROC COMPANY CARTRIDGE FLOW REGULATORS, CIVIC CENTER 5 i S 07 61 89 44 32 85 58 96 34 98 05 07 97 50 136 94 131 80 3,064 29 x 331 96 118 46 4 `23 3750 2�O 00 2000 5 00 3835 9,9 6 00 9 56 't9 86 f� CITY OF GRA",'" TERRACE �- DATE SEP _3ER 14, 1989 CHECK REUISTER NO i 091489 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 20481 TRAFFIC CONTROLL SERVICES, INC REFLECTIVE TAPE $ 292 88 20482 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS UMPIRES, SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL, AUGUST, 1989 558 00 20483 U-HAUL CENTER FONTANA EQUIPMENT FOR CITY TRUCK 147 26 20484 UNOCAL FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT 183 31 20485 WEST END UNIFORMS UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL 233 73 20486 WILSON'S FRAME-UP FRAME FOR COUNCIL PORTRAIT 3D 54 TOTAL $ 88,370 74 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY THOMAS SCHWAB i FINANCE DIRECTOR I i .!,` CITY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 10. 1989 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 10, 1989, at 6 00 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Singley. ITEMS TO DELETE Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 10 p.m. Item 6A - McDuffee Improvements/Dedication City Manager Schwab indicated that staff would like to add to the agenda, under 6B, an Interim Urgency Ordinance to extend the time allotted to develop the hillside zoning. CC-89-162 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, on the agenda under 6B. CONSENT CALENDAR SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER to place an Interim Urgency Ordinance CC-89-163 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar with the removal of Item H. COS RKAL AG ',)A ITEM 4 � n Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 2 ITEM FOR DISCUSSION r PUBLIC COMMENT A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 072789 - 081089 B. RATIFY 8/10/89 CRA ACTION C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA D. APPROVE 7/13/89 & 7/18/89 MINUTES E. AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE AT LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES 91st ANNUAL CONFERENCE - OCTOBER 22-25, 1989, SAN FRANCISCO F. NEGATIVE DECLARATION (0'CONNEL) SA-89-5 G. RESTRICTED PARKING - CITY CENTER COURT 2H. CITY COUNCIL AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that an additional 150 for an automobile allowance could not be justified. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, Grand Terrace, asked when the rezoning of the Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace Road area will be discussed, he indicated that he is opposed to the possibility of the City funding improvements on the McDuffee property, which is scheduled for discussion, he made reference to a letter he received from the Planning Department, in which he was asked to remove some trees, indicating that the request is out of line. City Manager Schwab indicated that a Public Hearing for the rezoning is scheduled for the next Council meeting on August 24th. Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, Grand Terrace, pointed out that Councilmember Carlstrom should remove himself from any discussion about the potential real estate negotiation, which was discussed in closed session, because the agent involved is an employee of his. City Attorney Harper, replied that in future meetings Councilmember Carlstrom should not be involved in any discussion of the acquisition and indicated that Councilmember Carlstrom made it clear in the discussion that he did have a conflict of interest and as a consequence would be removing himself from discussion. Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 3 John Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, indicated that he felt that the traffic light at the intersection of Mt. Vernon and Barton Road is too long, he reported that there is a lot of congestion on Barton Road at the freeway and suggested that the City look into widena-ng Bar -ton Road at the bridge, he noted that -there is --- a fire hazard at Vista Grande Way and Grand Terrace Road, across from the school, he indicated that he has no problem with Council increasing their stipend, suggested that the City look into a program used by the City of Loma Linda, in which a tree is planted and possibly named after a person. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo that the Terrace View School up to the curb without a suggested that Council take a Way, Grand Terrace, indicated has paved a parking lot right sidewalk or landscaping and look at it. Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry St., Grand Terrace, suggested that Counci instruct the City Manager to investigate what the cost would be to widen the bridge, on Barton Rd. at I-215, to four lanes, and also bring back ideas for funding sources to have the bridge completely upgraded in five years. Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. Mayor Matteson, asked for suggestions on what could be done about the length of the traffic light at Mt. Vernon and Barton Road. City Manager Schwab, indicated that he would have Signal Maintenance come out and make a recommendation. Councilmember Pfennighausen, was first put in, the City the senior citizens who said to cross the street and felt stated that, when the light received some complaints from they didn't have enough time the light should be longer. Councilmember Carlstrom, asked if the number of accidents has decreased since the light was installed at that intersection. City Manager Schwab, indicated that he would contact the Sheriff's Department and see if there are any accidents on record and report back to Council. Mayor Matteson, asked if there are any plans to improve the bridge on Barton Road. City Manager Schwab, indicated that the City Engineer has done cost studies for widening the freeway in the past and it would be simple to bring the figures up to date. Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 4 Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that if the half -cent sales tax passes and the freeway is widened to the Riverside County line, it would give us a better chance of working with Cal Trans to get the bridge widened. --- -- Mayor Matteson,- stated that --he--thinks--an adopt—a=tree program is a good idea and felt the City should look into programs run by other cities. ORAL REPORTS Councilmember Pfennighausen, was concerned about the maintenance of the trees 4A. Committee Reports 1. Historical & Cultural Committee Council accepted July 3, 1989 Minutes. 4B. Council Reports Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that the City Manager has indicated in his report about trash recycling that he will be coming to Council for an exclusive franchise, she indicated that she is opposed to that option and asked what would happen if a franchise refused to justify a rate increase, she indicated that there is a lot of yard sale signs going up on poles in the City and felt that the issue should be placed on a future agenda for Council to act on, she asked Mayor Matteson if he has made contact with Supervisor Younglove regarding the four-way stop on Main St., reported that she received a report from the City Engineer regarding the Advocate School site and pointed out that there are too many things wrong with the project and the City needs to see to it that they are corrected. Mayor Matteson, directed staff to make sure that the problems at the Advocate School site are corrected before the bonds are released. He reported that he has been in contact with Supervisor Younglove regarding the possibility of a 4-way stop on Main St. and he will follow up until some action is taken. City Manager Schwab, stated that if a franchise for garbage collection is unable to justify a rate increase, they would lose their franchise. He indicated that if Council is willing to appropriate funds, he will have a staff member work weekends to remove garage sale signs from poles in the City. Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 5 Councilmember Carlstrom, reported that he attended the California League of Cities conference and gained valuable information. Councilmember Singlet', suggested that any requests made of -~ - -city staff -be—made with the concensus of Council-.— -- - -V PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Pro Tem Grant, indicated that he has also spoke to Supervisor Younglove regarding Main St. and he seems to be in favor of a 4-way stop. He reported that he chaired the LAFCO meeting of July 19, 1989 and attended the San Bernardino Association of Governments Transportation Commission meeting of August 2, 1989, where he voted according to the majority of this Council, in favor of putting the sales tax measure on the ballot, he agreed that there is a problem with yard sale signs going up in the City and something needs to be done about it, indicated that the City has received a letter of gratitude for action taken on some reported complaints, asked for an update on the lawsuit involving billboards. City Attorney Harper, reported that at this point in the case involving billboards he is optimistic. Mayor Matteson, brought to the attention of Council that there is a corporation planning to open a large landfill behind the La Loma hills, he indicated that the City of San Bernardino has proposed an ordinance which requires residents to maintain their homes, and suggested that Council review the ordinance for consideration in our City, he indicated that he is anxious to begin the next step of the Goal Setting Workship, he made reference to a letter he received from Mr. Brown, of Stater Bros. Market, explaining that they now have a new american flag which is visible from the 215-freeway, he reported that he received a letter from a resident requesting that their area be zoned 20,000 ft., which will be discussed at the next meeting, reported that he received a letter from the President of the Grand Terrace Seniors thanking Council for the appropriation for senior funding and requesting storage space and a room for their use at the Senior/Community Center, he reported that this year's city/county conference is October 12 & 13 at the Lake Arrowhead Hilton. 5A. Landscaping and Lighting District 89-1 (terrace Pines) City Manager Schwab, reported that this Public Hearing is to for the formation of an assessment district in the Terrace Pines development. Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 6 There was no public comment. CC-89-164 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt Resolution 89-13 confirming a diagram and assessment and providing for the formation and annual - --- assessment levy of -a Terrace- Fines- La6dscapi ng and—:11:4 hti ng - Di stri ct No. 89-1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 6B. Urgency Ordinance - Zoning City Manager Schwab, reported that the Zoning Urgency Ordinance adopted on June 8, 1989, established a moratorium on development in the Honey Hills area for 45 days. Staff was to come back during that 45-day period and have it extended up to a year to allow the Planning Commission and Council sufficient time to study the issue. He indicated that staff is asking Council to adopt an Urgency Ordinance of the City Council imposing a moratorium on development to allow further study. CC-89-165 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt an Urgency Ordinance imposing a moratorium on development in the Honey Hills area to allow further study. NEW BUSINESS 7A. Joint Powers Agreement for Pretreatment Program Responsibilities and Authority in the Colton Wastewater Treatment Plant Service Area. Assistant City Manager Anstine, reported that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, along with the California Regional Water Quality Board, Santa Ana Region, mandate that Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) develop and implement a local pretreatment program. Since the City of Colton is the owner and operator of the POTW, Colton will be the entity held responsible for any violation of pretreatment laws. Based upon the fact that Colton is the owner, and that the City of Colton has qualified staff to conduct on site inspections of industrial waste discharge, it would be in the best interest of the City of Grand Terrace to approve the proposed Joint Powers Agreement, which will delineate the respective authority, responsibilities and obligations of Colton and Grand Terrace to assure compliance with the pretreatment requirements. Mayor Matteson, had concern that the City of Colton would avh e too much authority in our City. Council Minutes - 08/10/89 Page 7 City Manager Schwab, indicated that we are under a mandate to formally have a pretreatment program, and through a JPA with Colton, they will perform all of the pretreatment testis-g that is required. He indicated that we can have an agreement that if we are not happy with the pretreatment ---- - program, we can sever -or -change the- agr_eEiet: _- City Attorney Harper, stated that the agreement could be amended tonight to state that upon 30 days notice, either party may cancel the agreement. CC-89-166 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Joint Powers Agreement for Pretreatment Program Responsibilities and Authority in the Colton Wastewater Treatment Plant Service Area, with the addition of a 30-day cancellation notice. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8 15 p.m., until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held Thursday, August 24, 1989. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace. MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace. t CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 24, 1989 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 24, 1989, at 6 00 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Engineer ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager The meeting was Baptist Church, Carlstrom. ITEMS TO DELETE CONSENT CALENDAR opened with invocation by Dr. William Webber, Grand View followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 10 p.m. Item 6C - SA-89-2 (Clark) CC-89-167 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Councilmember Pfennighausen expressed her objection to the payment of Check No. 20394 (Grand Terrace Road park property). A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 082489 B. RATIFY 8/24/89 CRA ACTION C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA D. REJECTION OF LIABILITY CLAIM 89-03 (ESQUIVEL) Council Minutes - 08/24/89 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENT Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, Grand Terrace, had concern that a Specific Plan Committee had been formed without Council authorization. He questioned the selection of the committee _- - - -- members -and asked why there is no representation -from- -the- community. He suggested that the meetings be publicized and open to the public. He also had concern that Mayor Matteson, who is a member of the committee, lives in the area which will be discussed by the committee. City Manager Schwab, explained that the committee is part of the Specific Plan review process. He stated that he formed the committee to meet with the consultants so they can learn about the concerns of the community. The committee will meet five times and after they develop a draft to present to the public, there will be several public hearings as well as a workshop with the Chamber of Commerce for their input. Mayor Matteson, asked City Attorney Harper to address the comment made regarding a possible conflict of interest. City Attorney Har er, stated that there is no conflict of interest because the Code specifically excludes residentially occupied property. Councilmember Pfennighausen, felt that it is a good idea to put together a group of people to meet with the consultants and suggested that Council establish an Ad Hoc Committee with the members being the Planning Director, a Planning Commissioner, the Chamber of Commerce President Elect, the Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, one Council member, and five community members with each Council member appointing one member. Mayor Matteson, felt that all five community members should be ratified by the balance of council. He directed staff to put the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee on a future agenda for action. City Manager Schwab, felt that the committee should be selected before the next Council meeting so they can proceed in a timely manner. Councilmember Singley, felt that it is a good idea to form an Ad Hoc Committee. It was the concensus of Council to schedule a Special Council meeting for Thursday, August 31, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. to take action on this item. Council Minutes - 08/24/89 Page 3 ORAL REPORTS 4A. Committee Reports 1. Parks & Recreation Committee Dick Weeks, Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Committee, reported that the Parks & Recreation Committee recommends the appointment of Catherine Leogrande. CC-89-168 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to appoint Catherine Leogrande to the Parks & Recreation Committee. Council accepted the June 5, 1989 Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Committee. 4B. Council Reports Councilmember Pfenni hausen, commended staff for cleaning up the City, reminded Council that school will be starting soon and some action needs to be taken to get sidewalks on Michigan Avenue for the safety of the school children, she reported that there has been three more accidents at the intersection of Main and Michigan, and felt that action needs to be taken immediately to install a four-way stop at that intersection. City Attorney Harper, stated that a motion to add an item to the agenda requires a 4/5 vote. CC-89-169 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to add a four-way stop at Main and Michigan on the agenda for action at this meeting. Mayor Matteson, indicated that he will vote no because he has been working with Supervisor Younglove regarding the four-way stop and felt that he should be given a reasonable amount of time to take action. Councilmember Singley, indicated that he is aware that the Mayor has been working with Supervisor Younglove and suggested that Council include in the vote that if the stop signs are not installed within a reasonable amount of time, the City of Grand Terrace will take action. Councilmember Carlstrom, felt that this is a serious problem and indicated that he is in favor of taking emergency action. Councilmember Pfenni hausen, stated that she would not be willing to amend her motion. Council Minutes - 08/24/89 Page 4 3 MOTION 89-169 FAILED 3-1-1-0 (MAYOR MATTESON VOTED NOE AND MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT WAS ABSENT) Mayor Matteson, reported that he attended a meeting regarding the planned shopping center on Barton Road in - --- Cooley Ranch -and the citizens in that- area -have- put- a referendum on the ballot so that that development will stop until the citizens of Colton vote on it in the November election. He reported that the group proposing the half -cent sales tax plans to spend $800,000 to pass the measure this year, he indicated that he is still against the measure. PUBLIC HEARING Council directed staff to put a four-way stop at Main and Michigan on the agenda for the Special Meeting on August 31, 1989. 5A. TTM 88-3 (Siglund) Community Develo ment Director Sawyer, reported that TTM-88-3 is an application to subdivide 1.9 acres into five single-family lots. He recommended that Council adopt the resolution approving TTM-88-3 and the associated Negative Declaration subject to the conditions contained therein. Richard Siglund, Siglund & Associates, 364 Orange Show Rd., San Bernardino, indicated that the project has been redesigned to a lower density and meets all the City Codes and development standards. Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. CC-89-170 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to approve TTM-88-3, as recommended. 5B. Z-89-2 Zoning Community Development Director Sawyer, reported that Z-89-2 is a proposal to change Area 8A from R1-10A to R1-20A and eliminate the R1-10 District from Chapters 18.09 and 18.12 of the Municipal Code. He recommended that Council adopt an ordinance changing the district designation for Area 8A. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, indicated that he is in favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots,. John Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, stated that he is in favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Council Minutes - 08/24/89 Page 5 Kim Hathaway, 22988 Vista Grande Way, stated that she is in favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Lillie Rivera, 23170 Vista Grande Way, stated that she is in favor of 10,000 sq. ft. lots. Syliva Winters, 23246 Barton Road, stated that she would prefer that the zoning stay at 10,000 sq. ft. lots. Romayne Chinnock, 22935 Arliss Dr., indicated that he is in favor or 20,000 sq. ft. lots to retain the rural atmosphere. Joseph Palencia, 22905 Arliss Dr., stated that he is 1n favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Dick ChurchwelI, Barton Rd. and Grand Terrace Rd., stated that he wou ike his property to remain R1-10. Chancey Eller, 23100 Vista Grande Way, presented a petition stating that he and several other residents in area 8A want to remain zoned R1-10. Katherine Katz, Vista Grande Way & Grand Terrace Rd., indicated that she is in favor of R1-10. Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Dr., felt that a section of area 8A could be zoned R1-10 while the remainder is zoned R1-20. Kathryn Harmon, 11834 Kingston, stated that she is in favor of 10,000 sq. ft. lots. Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. Councilmember Carlstrom, abstained from discussion due to a potential conflict of interest. Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that she is still in favor of R1-10 with an agricultural overlay, stating that she doesn't feel that there is enough justification for 20,000 sq. ft. lots. CC-89-171 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to approve the configuration showing the area split into two sections. Councilmember Singley, felt that the compromise gives the people what they need and want. MOTION CC-89-171 CARRIED 3-0-1-1 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT AND COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM ABSTAINED) Council directed staff to notify the property owners of the zoning for their area. Council Minutes - 08/24/89 Page 6 6A. Amend Sewer Fee Portion of Fee Ordinance City Manager Schwab, reported that staff is requesting that Council amend Ordinance 112, Item 17 Sewer User Charges, establishing new rates for commercial/industrial users. CC-89-172 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to amend Ordinance No. 112 as an Urgency Ordinance, Item 17 Sewer User Charges, establishing new rates for commercial and/or industrial users. 6B. Authorization of overtime for weekend staffin (for removal of illegal signs) City Manager Schwab, reported that staff is currently involved with the County in a Weekend Work Release Program which is being staffed by the Assistant City Manager and the Maintenance Leadman. He indicated that staff and the weekend workers remove illegal signs and pick up parkway debris. He requested an appropriation of $8,000 per year to provide sufficient overtime funding so that an employee can be available to supervise the work release crew. CC-89-173 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to authorize $8,000 overtime for staff to supervise the work release program on the weekends. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8 30 p.m., to an Adjourned Regular meeting, to be held Thursday, August 31, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace. MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace. PENDING CITY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 31, 1989 An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 31, 1989, at 6 00 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager John Harper, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Attorney The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Carlstrom. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m. 1. Establishment of AD HOC Committee for Specific Plan City Manager Schwab, reported that staff has formed an informal Specific Plan Review Committee that consists of the Mayor, Chairman of the Planning Commission, President and Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, the Community Development Director and the City Manager. He recommended that Council appoint these people to a formal Specific Plan AD HOC Committee. MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to accept the nominations as recommended with the exception of the Mayor, who will be replaced with Councilmember Singley. Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that there should be an official AD HOC ommittee with a clearly stated purpose and suggested that Peggy Taylor be appointed as a member of the community at large. Councilmember Singley, felt that there is no need for a Councilmember to be on the committee, which would require that it be an official AD HOC Committee. He indicated that this is only an advisory committee. He stated that the City Manager is the Council Minutes - 08/31/89 Page 2 1 Administrator of the City and he should be able to form an advisory committee to advise him and then he will advise us as to the outcome. Mayor Matteson, felt that there is no reason for changing the City -- -Manager's recommendatmrr; he-c-oncurre-d- with Councilmember Si ngl ey. -- City Manager Schwab, felt that there is no need for a formal committee. Peggy Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, stated that she would be willing to serve on the Committee. Mayor Matteson amended his motion and Second concurred. CC-89-174 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 3-1-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN VOTED NOE AND MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT WAS ABSENT), to allow the City Manager to appoint members to the advisory committee. 2. Four -Way Stop at Main and Michigan City Manager Schwab, recommended that Council adopt a resolution authorizing the installation of a four-way stop and to work closely with Riverside County to have the signs installed as soon as possible. In the event the signs are not installed within sixty days, Grand Terrace will properly mark and install a four-way stop. Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that 60 days is too long. She indicated t at s e could support the resolution because it does not state a specific amount of time. Mayor Matteson, felt that Riverside should be given time to place their sign before we take action, that he has been working with Supervisor Younglove, and we should give them some time. Councilmember Singley, agreed that 60 days is a long time and indicated that he would support the resolution if staff reports to Council regularly as to the progress of Riverside County. City Manager Schwab, indicated that the resolution needs to be approved so that he will have authorization to place the stop signs when Riverside has the approval to place theirs. CC-89-175 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to approve the resolution with an additional section that reads, "City staff will be directed to place the stop signs when Riverside has the approval to place theirs." Council Minutes - 08/31/89 Page 3 ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the Adjourned Regular City Council meeting at 7 00 p.m., until the next Regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held Thursday, September 14, 1989. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace. MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace. CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT DATE September 7, 1989 CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE 9-14-89 SUBJECT DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X On September 30, 1989 our Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program will expire In order to be a recipient of Department of Transportation funds and subsequent to Title 49 CFR, Part 23, the City must annually adopt this program See attached letter from the Department of Transportation STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL ADOPT A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NEXT YEAR'S GOALS IN BOTH MINORITY AND MAJORITY MEDIA WITH A 45-DAY COMMENT PERIOD NB i n. i41f•,f i a l !_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor DISTRICT 8 P O BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402 TDD (714) 3834609 (714) 383-4565 August 1, 1989 Ms Nita Brown DBE Liaison Officer City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Ms Brown On September 30, 1989 your Disadvantaged Business Program (DBE) will expire The 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (STURAA) states that for purposes of the Act, women are presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged Accordingly, FHWA has eliminated the requirement for separate DB and WBE goals Future pro3ects shall contain only DBE goals of which any or all may be made up of WBE's The minimum DBE goal is still 10%, but also includes women under the new Act The need for a list of anticipated pro]ects and a statement of the overall goals are no longer required However, you are required to publish your next year's goals in both minority and maDority media with a 45-day comment period for informational purposes Please be sure advertisement shows the annual goal and the goal period of October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990 Documentation of advertisement of annual oals must be forwarded to our office A Resolution will not be required this year unless your Agency did not renew their goal last year, in that case it is requested that a Resolution be adopted similar to the following "The (Local Agency) Disadvantaged Business Program is hereby modified to comply with the 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act which presumes that women are socially and economically disadvantaged individuals whose participation may be counted in attaining DBE goals As such separate WBE goals will no longer be used and the terms "DB and WBE" in the current adopted program shall be understood to mean DBE " A copy of the Resolution and advertisement must also be forwarded to our office Ms Brown Page 2 August 1, 1989 As this is a FHWA requirement for all federally funded pro3ects, it is important that the DBE goals be kept current Failure to comply will result in your inability to advertise present -or- fu-ture -r DeidtTa�ly7��fund-e-d If you have any questions, please call Mary Patterson at (714) 383- 4565 Very truly yours, J L BALCOM Chief, Local Streets and Roads W 0 12 415 STAFF REPORT, Attached you will find a copy of an executed "Storm Drain Construction r_ _-Agreement" hetween Wilden Pump and Engineering_- Company_and the__C-ity of. - Grand -Terrace Under the provisions of this agreement, City would be permitted to increase the storm flows through Wilden Pump property and discharge into that system up to 55 cubic feet per second (c f s ) of surface run—off In 1978, an upstream developer, County of San Bernardino and the City of Grand Terrace were named in a lawsuit and a temporary injunction was issued against increasing the rate of discharge through that property This agreement will allow the City to increase the surface run—off to 55 c f s and that rate of flow would be adequate for all of the run—off tributary from the properties upsteam under ultimate development, based on current general plan and zoning Staff recommends that 1 City Council approve the subject agreement 2 Authorize the Mayor to sign it r-ro , r i , ( i i�tia c-rrns — � r rt 1CONSTRtJCTION AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Grand Terrace, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Wilden Pump and Engineering Company, hereinafter referred to as (WILDEN) R E C I T A L S WHEREAS, WILDEN has constructed and there presently exists a storm drain system through certain property owned by WILDEN, specifically Assessor's Parcel Nos 277-101-36, 277-101-62 and 277-101-63, and WHEREAS, said storm drain system was constructed to accept run-off from upstream properties directed to the subject property through a separate storm drain system located in existing public rights -of -way and easements, previously constructed by other than WILDEN, AND WHEREAS, said previoully constructed system is inadequate in capacity to provide for that tributary drainage to be conveyed to the system constructed by WILDEN, and, WHEREAS, without replacement, the inadequate tributary storm drain system has the potential to cause property damage to those properties located upstream of the system constructed by WILDEN, and WHEREAS, the City desires to construct a storm drain system adequate in size to eliminate said drainage problem and potential upstream property damage and to replace said existing system constructed by other than WILDEN with a system adequate in size to eliminate said drainage problem and potential property damage, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS 1 The foregoing Recitals are true and correct 2 The City agrees to construct a storm drain system replacing that storm drain system constructed by other tea-"n WILDEN at no cost to WILDEN, to convey tributary of the storm flows through the replacement system to equal 50 c f s , which is less than the capacity 71 c f s of the WILDEN constructed system Under no circumstances will the system constructed by the CITY exceed 55 c f s 3 CITY will, at no cost to WILDEN, replace any facilities disrupted on WILDEN property in condition equal to or better than, prior to construction 4 The recompaction of material removed shall be such that no failures in the surface shall occur 5 WILDEN agrees to accept the tributary drainage conveyed by the reconstructed system into the existing system which WILDEN constructed 6 WILDEN agrees to allow the CITY to connect said replaced system at no cost to the CITY, other than those costs associated with the actual physical construction of the connection 7 CITY agrees to indemnify and hold harmless WILDEN against any claims arising out of the CITY'S construction of the replacement drainage system resulting from the intentional or negligent acts of the CITY'S officers, employees, or agents related to the construction of said replacement drainage system DATED DATED _ C� BYRON R MATTESON MAYOR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WILDEN PUMP AND ENGINEERING CO BY STAFF REPORT --DATE -"September-7; 1989 --- — C R A ITEM( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE 9 14 1989 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT Review of Negative Declaration for Site and Architectural SA 89 2 A Mixed Retail and Office Center to be located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue TS FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X DISCUSSION On July 5, 1989, the Site and Architectural Review Board approved SA-89-02, a 92,600 sq ft mixed retail and office center to be located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue Additionally, the SAR Board reviewed the project's Negative Declaration and recommended its approval by the City Council The SAR Board's approval of SA-89-02 is subject to the following conditions of approval 1 The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the siteplan and architectural design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board on July 5, 1989 as illustrated in Attachment A Minor changes and/or clarifications may be made by the Planning Department 2 The architectural design of the proposed convenience store shall be similar in nature to buildings A, B, and C and shall be submitted for independent Site and Architectural Review at the time said convenience store is ready for construction 3 The architectural design of the proposed restaurant shall be submitted for independent Site and Architectural Review at the time said restaurant is ready for construction 4 The proposed traffic mitigation measures identified in the "Traffic Impact Study" prepared by J F Davidson and Associates (Attachment �~ B) shall be incorporated into the proposed project and shall be in place prior to the issuance of occupancy for any of the proposed buildings 5 The applicant shall comply with all the comments recommended by the City Engineer listed 1n his Memorandum dated February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment C 6 The concerns of the County Traffic Engineer stated in his letter dated December 13, 1988 and the State Department of Transportation stated in their letter dated January 27, 1989 (Attachment E) shall be reviewed and incorporated in the "Traffic Impact Study" to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 7 The requirements of the Forestry and Fire Warden Department as listed in their letter dated January 29, 1989 (Attachment F) shall be complied with 8 The applicant shall submit detailed water plans for approval to the Riverside Highland Water District in accordance with their letter dated January 30, 1989 and attached as Attachment G 9 The requirements of the Department of Environmental Health Services recommended in their response received February 13, 1989 (Attachment H) shall be complied with 10 The applicant shall pay the appropriate fees to the Colton Umfied School District 11 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and irrigation plan for approval by the Planning Department 12 A coordinated sign program for the entire center shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department All signs shall be applied for in accordance with the City's sign permit process 13 All aspects of the proposed project including landscaping and irrigation systems, and building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION �~ The Planning Commission and the Planning Department recommend the City Council approve the attached Negative Declaration for SA-89-02 Respectfully- Submitted, ,ems' ------ David Sawyer, Community Developm nt Director M airy_ 6?'F` �. TER R c Plan nzng Department �TO.,-..� _� T Planning Commission FROM, David Sawyer, Community Development Director DATE July 5, 1989 SUBJECT Staff Report, SA-89-2 APPLICANT Gary Clark LOCATION 12028 La Crosse Ave REQUEST Site and Architectural Review of a proposed 92,600 square foot mixed retail and office center ZONING AND LANDUSE Property GP Zoning Land Use SubDect Property GC C2 Commercial with 2/3 of the site vacant To the West GC C2 Commercial and proposed RV Park To the East _ - 215 Freeway To the North LDR R2 S i n g 1 e Family Homes To the South GC C2 Commercial ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proDect and is attached as Attachment J P C STAFF REPORT 22795 Batton Road • Grand leiidce, Calitoinza 92324-5295 a (714) 824-6621 The applicant is proposing to build a 92,600 square foot mixed retail and office center The subject site contains 6 1 acres (265,716 square feet) and approximately 1/3 of the site is currently developed with office and retail uses located in approximately 15 to 20 year old structures The proposal calls for three (3) major buildings plus a site for a restaurant and a —convenienoe--stor_e/ga_s-_s-t Building A (See Attachment A) is a 19,100 square foot single story structure which will house upscale auto related retail businesses such as a major tire dealer, an auto parts store, an auto stereo store and similar businesses Buildings B (37,600 sq ft ) and C (28,300 sq ft ) are two story structures and will provide space for retail/service commercial businesses on the ground floors with additional retail space as well as office space available on the second floors The restaurant facility is proposed at 4,800 square feet and the convience store is proposed at 2,800 square feet The project has been divided into two (2) phases for construction Purposes with buildings B, C and the restaurant site in phase 1 and the remainder in phase 2 The project meets all current zoning code requirements including the recently approved off-street parking chapter The architecture of buildings A. B and C will consist of concrete tilt up styled construction with numerous columns, balconies and _ covered walkways The body of the buildings as well as various relief features such as the columns will be colored one of three (3) shades of gray, two (2) shades of green will provide accent on the awnings and handrails while the roof constructed of bronse metal will provide additional contrast (colored elevations, a materials board and photos of a similarly designed project will be available at the time of your meeting) The architecture of the convience store will be similar to buildings A, B and C while the architecture of the restaurant is not detailed at this time so as to remain flexible in consideration of individual needs of the future tenant As part of the review of this project, a "Traffic Impact Study" was prepared by J F Davidson and Associates This report looks at the proposed project and analyzes its impact on the local traffic system and makes recommendations to mitigate these impacts The conclusions and recommendations from this report are attached as Attachment B REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS The following responses have been recieved from the City's Reviewing Agencies F The Engineering/Building & Safety Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment C These comments address the issues of public improvements, grading and drainage facilities, and traffic impact COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEER The San Bernardino County Traffic Engineer which provides services to the City on a contract/as needed basis was asked to review the "Traffic Impact Study" for this project and his comments are included in his letter dated December 13, 1988 and attached as Attachment D STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The State Department of Transportation comments are included in their letter dated January 27, 1989 and attached as Attachment E FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT The Fire Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated January 29, 1989 and attached as Attachment F RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER DISTRICT The Water District's comments are included in their letter dated January 30, 1989 and attached as Attachment G DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRNOMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES The Department of Environmental Health Services' comments are included in their response recieved February 13, 1989 and attached as Attachment H COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The School District's comments are included in their letter dated February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The Planning Department recommends the following conditions of approval, 1 The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the slteplan and architectural design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board on July 5, 1989 and as illustrated in Attachment A Minor changes and/or clarifications may be made by the Planning Department shall be similar in nature to buildings A, Bland eCstore 3 The architectural design of the proposed restaurant shall be submitted for independent Site and Architectural Review at the time said restaurant is ready for construction _== Thy =p-O`p'��6d=-tra-ff=ic= rnIt- t o%= fi� ur s�-ic ent ne Tn==-- the "Traffic Impact Study" prepared by J F Davidson and Associates (Attachment B) shall be incorporated into the proposed pro3ect and shall be in lace p prior to the issuance of occupancy for any of the proposed buildings 5 The applicant shall comply with all comments recommended by the City Engineer listed in his Memorandum dated February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment C 5 The concerns of the County Traffic Engineer stated in his letter dated December 13, 1988 (Attachment D) and the State Department of Transportation stated in their letter dated January 27, 1989 (Attachment E) shall be reviec,ed and incorporated in the "Traffic Impact Study" to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6 The requirements of the Forestry and Fire Warden Department as listed in their letter dated January 29, 1989 (Attachment F) shall be complied with 7 The applicant shall submit detailed water plans for approval to the Riverside Highland Water District inaccordance with their letter dated January 30, 1989 and attached as Attachment G 8 The requirements of the Department of Environmental Health Services recommended in their response recieved February 13, 1989 (Attachment H) shall be complied with 9 The applicant shall pay the appropriate fees to the Colton Unified School District 10 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and irrigation plans for approval by the Planning Department 10 A coordinated sign program for the entire center shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department All signs shall be applied for inaccordance with the City's sign permit process 11 All aspects of the proposed project including landscaping and irrigation systems, and building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to tt-e satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance i 1 vt d1. an t e overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the Grand Terrace Site and Architectural Review Board approve SA-89-2 subject to the 11s�tcd``�ove Respectf y submitted by David Sawyer, Community Developm nt Director l Ir TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TERRACE GATEWAY GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 1988 Prepared for Mr Gary Clark P 0 Box 1866 San Marcos, CA 92069 Prepared by J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC 3426 Tenth Street Riverside, CA 92502 cQ,of�ss,\ �S B Op�9l �P ctz tC 3 E+n 1 7 MCA L ATTACHMENT B Table 3 shows that with the addition of project traffic to existing traffic on the existing roadway that all five (5) intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service except for the afternoon peak at Barton Road and LaCrosse (southbound ramps) The P M peak hour at that —intersection, is ex ct d_ c2__opera+p____at a _Lever_J-of. Servj-ce-=E= with the existing roadway configuration CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The development of the proposed project will result in a cumulative impact to the adjacent street network However, with one exception, the impact will not be significant when the resulting projected levels of service are considered With the addition of project traffic onto the existing street system, the intersections would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service except for the intersection of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue during the afternoon peak traffic hour During that time period, the intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service E, or capacity In order to change the Level of Service at the one intersection to an acceptable level, it is- recommended that the southbound through/left lane be split to provide separate left and through lanes The improvement will change the P M peak hour level of service from "E" to "D" An acceptable level of service will then be anticipated at all five intersections for both morning and afternoon peak traffic hours The site access was also reviewed The only unusual aspect of the site access is the fact that La Crosse Avenue is, in fact, the extension of the southbound off -ramp from the freeway to Barton Road The development of the project will impose additional traffic movements on the roadway, including left turns across the ramp traffic It is also expected that a percentage of the southbound traffic from the ramp will be slowing to turn into the project site In order to increase safety for southbound vehicles and crossing traffic, it is recommended that Caltrans consider installing an "exit speed" sign at the entrance to the off - ramp from the freeway The advance warning would provide an opportunity for ramp traffic to reduce speed and advise that the reduced speed was necessary RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES 1 Provide an additional southbound lane at Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue to separate southbound left and through movements This will Primarily require restriping. Some minor widening may be required (see Exhibit 7) t 2 Provide an "exit speed" warning sign at the entrance to the southbound off -ramp from the freeway (Caltrans) _ t-y-p e- t�7rr Crosse Avenue south of its connection with the southbound off -ramp The higher design of the street r type entrance will reduce slowing at the entrance and decrease the impact on southbound traffic h G � � C 1{ F 1 � Q c C � i i lC I rl � Ilh h LA CR05SE To,K— EXHIBIT 7 PROPOSED STRIPING ry MODIFICATION „-------------- �- Mayor g +l L y I BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tem r) 1 1 ti FEB p Council Members HUGHJ GRANT PLANNiNu Uti'MIMcNI DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager W 0 12-8 5113 r0 David Sawyer, Planning Director FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer / DATE February 1, 1989 SUBJECT SA 89-02 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for the above project 1 Dedicate additional right-of-way as may be necessary to provide for the following (a) Total Roadway Width - curb separation of 42 feet (b) Parkway width of 12 feet This will provide one lane of traffic in each direction and a turning lane (c) In the transition area of LaCrosse North of Barton, submit design and dedicate accordingly for 14 foot lanes as indicated in the traffic study Please note that the anticipated service level at that intersection upon completion of these improvements is "D”, below acceptable planning standards of current County planning (No existing facilities are indicated in the traffic study or the plans submitted by the architect, nor are any dimensions shown indicating the relationship of existing improvements to the existing right-of-way lines, Caltrans and City ) 2 Construct standard curb and gutter based traffic study, recommendation of San Bernardino County and Caltrans and Item 1 above 3 Install standard sidewalk along frontage of subject properties 4 Install ornamental street lights ATTACHMENT C 22795 BARTnN RnAn . rnQAt.ln -rcnnr,r-r7 I. Recommendations for SA 89-02 February 1, 1989 Page 2 S Install paving as may be required from the lip of the gutter to street T ` center line 6 Provide adequate drainage facilities 7 Install standard driveway approaches 8 Pay all fees pursuant to the applicable ordinances 9 Provide street striping plan and stripe in accordance wiLh approved plan 10 All improvements shall be designed by the owner's civil engineers to the specifications of the City JK/ct TRANSPORTATION/FL- JD DEPARTMENT -,ONTROL 825 East Third Street • San Bernardino CA 92415-0835 • (714) 387 2800 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN( ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY KEN A MILLER Director 1' M C , 0 December 13, 1988 .- _ _- t<'= � __ � ._ .✓ �- ra _o-w ?- ""''�",^' Y-"t_.itry�-_w�.s-v--, v. .. ._.._...... __._.--..,--. __-_.�.... �,-_-...- _-m_ �_.__... __-......_._..�..-<-«- ... r/..v���i � -� ti f7 L/Af/-kT City of Grand 'Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 ATIN DAVID SAWYER, Co=mlty Development Director Dew Y- S=Y7yer In response to your letter dated November 22, 1988, requesting comments for the Traffic Impact Study submitted by J F Davidson Associates, Inc for the Terrace Gateway development in the City of Grand Terrace We offer the following ccm rents The plot plan shows three driveways for this develc nent The driveway furthest to the south may pose a conflict because of the proximity to the intersection of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue. We recarmex-)d the driveway be eliminated or designed in such a way to preclude traffic from making left turns in or out, this is shown as a riot out only driveway in exhibit 7 but was not mentioned in the study There were no expansion factors given for existing traffic and there were no Cumulative effects accounted for Level of service was analyzed and given in table 3 It should be noted that the minty of San Bernard-ino is no longer planning for level of service D but is planning for level of service C Consideration should be given to rewire a full width street standard on T use Avezuie T-,s shyold inc" Lud6 une larP- in each d�rectiuli w��t emergency shoulders and a left turn lane to acccmrodate turns for both directions The study did not analyze any intersection to the west of the project The intersections of Barton Road and Grand Terrace Road, Barton Road and La Cadena Drive and Barton Road at the Southern Pacific railroad crossing should be analyzed for traffic impacts ATTACHMENT D 0CAP r, , , City of Grand Terrace Attn David Sawyer DeOen ber 13, 1988 It was noted that the proDect distribution as shown in exhibit 4 indicates that this local dial develognent is anticipated to generate 701 of Its patrons from I-215 freeway, 10� frcan the La C'ulena area and only 20� frarn the Grand Terrace carmrnznity I assume these are }wed on a marketing analysis for the specific types of businesses as shah In eNdubit 2 Should these change a new traffic analysis may be necessary Thank you for the opportunity to review and ccrment on the proDect Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me Very truly yours, �FILI'�b R / GQUjN�Tfljf, Traffic Engineer FRG/vs 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402 TDD (714) 3834609 January 27, 1989 FEB 0 j I� , , YLhIVIYiIrU U�rhrllnlc(rl Planning Department City of Grand Terrace Attention David R Sawyer 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr Sawyer Development Review 08-SBd-215-1 3 Your Reference (Gary Clark) Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed development of a service commercial center located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue (Barton Road) in Grand Terrace This proposal is slightly removed from an existing state highway Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the State highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of this area The previous review of the traffic analysis by Mr Don Allen will suffice the requirements of traffic signing If additional information is desired, please call Mr Thomas J Neville at (714) 383-4384 Very truly yours, 9 H N LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer ATTACHMENT E FORESTRY AND FIF', . WP..�DEN DEPARTMET Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN 385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415 0186 OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY I7141 M -421Z 87-421 nyn Tm.,,... DAVID J DRISCOLL, Chief z �1 EMERGENCY SERVICES Al DATE JANUARY 29, 1989 Sn i 4 [Ile co-) " OF -GI ND-TE RACE Planning Dept APN -- �-- � t_ - 1 DAV1,D J. DRISCOLL, Chief ��- County Fire Warden SUBJECT FIRE Pi-oTD moN REQUIREmENZ'S CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT C y of (,)a � - 1 X 1 Fl The above re£ei enced project is protected by the Pores try- cr- 3F001 & Fire Warden Dept Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contdct the fire department for verification of current fire - protection development requirements IXI F2, All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the 517002 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No 106), Development Code, Cortnunity Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of CdliEornia 1` F3 The street address shall be ( ) posted with a minimum of three 3 -' 5F003 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from thu street- 1X1 F4 Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any-- 517004 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint- ,)r - - ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire , Code 1 XI F5 All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each bl>> ]ding ,., 3F005 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet fLom any flammable building r material, including a finished structure ' 1X1 F6 The development and each phase thereof shall have two points r 1F006 of vehicular access for fire and other emeryency equipment, and for r routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code.,- IX1 F7. PrivaLe roadways which exceed one —hundred and fifty (150) in r',- 1F007 length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of _ all buildings is the natuLal grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) where (1) ATTACHMENT F the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department IXI F8 A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 11'008 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six-hundzed (600) feet except as identified in the Development Code -- -- -- - _ - -_ - - _ F9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to gLading 1Tr"9 and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having Jurisdiction I X I F10 All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow 1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the frLe agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water The following are minimum requirements for your proposed development A System Standards *Fire Flow 3500 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with sprinklered building Duration 3 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 300 Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received B Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C Fire Hydrants_ Numbers 6 Total (public only) Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate X1 Fll The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal- _F011 (2) culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow " F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection 3FO12 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided forea_c_h_parcelLthe minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the- fire � _ = T_ F13 The developer or his engineer shall £uLnish the fire department 11� _ with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation F14 Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino 3FO14 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req- 1F015 uiLements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department Questions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning Se >n, County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard- in,- .alifornia, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225 Thank you for your coopera- tion Sincerely, BY NANCY BEST Fire Protection Planning Inspector cc RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER 3517 FILE Tt-�e following are IXJ Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications IXI Comments r NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS REFERENCE # SA 89-2 NAME TERRACE GATEWAY LOCATION 12028 La Crosse Ave , Grand Terrace, Ca THE FOLLOWING NON-STA-NDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT BASED UPON PLANS _SUBMITTED= TO__THI_S OFFICE __�_ PLEASF",��T1�'1�CT�S�3Ei_ - - -- - _ � —m>- _ ,_ -'�--IND-YC�ATED--rrRE��6TECT10N PLA-N-NINGMOFFICE FOR--THEW,-P-PLICABLE STANDARD AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE IXI F16 Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1 F17 Any gated access shall be approved by the Fire Department and emergency access arrangements made prior to occupancy F18 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of sufficient information to review Please submit building plans and declaration of use for proper application of codes FJ9 The building occupancy is under the Durisdiction of the State Fire Marshal Written documentation of review and inspection required prior to final occupancy Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441 IXI F20 All flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79 Plan review and permit to operate are required F21 All commercial Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #3054 Plan review and permit to operate are required IXI F22 All access roadways shall be in accordance with County Ordinance #3055. F23 Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards) Compliance with the provisions of County Ordinance #3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department shall be required In those areas not so designated under said ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan Overlay Ordinance will apply r24 An automatic fire alarm system is required Said system shall be installed Lo the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2 IXI F25 Additional requirements shall be required as noted on attachments ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NON-STANDARD REFERENCE # SA 89-2 CONDITIONS Fire Extinguishing Systems LOCATION 12028 La Crosse Ave , ApN# Grand Terrace, Ca NAME TERRACE GATEWAY 26 An automatic fire extinguishingsyystemis �euired__�_ for t h e f o 1-1-o w— n g— a-r e a(-s-) - -- - A Commercial -type food heat -processing �-' equipment (UF(, Sec 10 314) B Spray paint booths or rooms (UFC Sec 45.209) C High piled combustible storage (UFC Sec 81 101) IXI D Occupancy and location (UFC Sec 10 308) E Entire building due lack of access (UFC Sec 10.207 fb) as amended by Cc Ord #3055) F Entire building and/or complex as fire flow mitigation measure (UFC Sec 10 301fc) as amended by Co Ord #3055) G Other area as indicated (UFC Sec 10 301(a) and 10 301(b) Spl haz) H Entire Building or portions thereof as applicable under State Fire Marshal's Regulations (Title 19, CAC) All fire extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinkler systems, Classes I, II and III combined standpipes, Halon systems and other special automatic extinguishing systems and basement pipe inlets shall be approved by both the Fire Department and the Office of Building and Safety prior to installation Said systems shall meet the appropriate standard whether NFPA or UBC The Fire Department shall be notified of any testing approval and shall witness said tests Systems shall be operational prior to occupancy 1 Square footage of building 2 Take the square root 3 Multiply by 18 --- -= 4uT Multiply-`by+Construction Factor (:T J 5 Mu I t i p J y by Occupancy Factor LL17 l 6 Distance to Exposures N S ( 2S') E ( ) w ( ) -73 0 LQ Exposure Factor N (j 0 S (��� E ( ) w Multiply by Total Exposure Factor 7 If sprinklered multiply Answer -Line 5 by 5 If not sprinklered, enter Line 5l 8 Add Line 6C— If Total is less than 2,500 gpm round to nearest 250 gpm If Total is more than 2)500 gpm round to nearest 500 gpm Total Required Fire Flow , - , J r` ,` .r -�. � `r ,.+� ' h �1?.���, �<l s;�?YHt��'rttT�h��r�I ,; �'�"-!1<<'r; � � � �����.r4;t�t(��"� �f _.1��� r ✓... l �iy �° Q/Y' °` 0ff, P R� 450 hington Street • Colton, California 92324 • (714) 825-4128 a , January 30, 1989 Community Development Director ", City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 RE Terrace Gateway 12028 La Cross Avenue APN #275-231-05/34/35/36 Dear David, Riverside Highland Water Company can see no reason why this project should not move forward Fhe project has no water plans at this time Gary Clark assured us that when he has approval from the City he will move forward with them RH skc Sincerely, a64 Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO ATTACHMENT G rt MA I I ESON , 4 Mayor Ito r BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN }- R _ F I,� B 13 10Mayor Pro Tem E Couna7 Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB 19 8 9 _`-�- _ City Manager `— FILE NUMBER. SA-89-02 APPLICANT TERRACE GATEWAY (GARY CLARK) LOCATION 12028 LA CROSSE AVENUE (APN# 275-231-05/34/35/36) PROJECT AN APPLICATION FOR A SERVICE COMMERCIAL CENTER COMPRISED OF 3 MAJOR BUILDINGS PLUS A SITE FOR A RESTAURANT AND A CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION. Dear Reviewing Agency The above referenced application is on file with the Grand Terrace Planning Department Please submit any comments your agency- may have regarding this application to the attention of David R Sawyer, Community Development Director, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92324 We apologize for the late notification of this pro3ect but would appreciate replies to this office no later than 'FEBRUARY"S; 1§89 (WEDNESDAY) UTILITY COMPANIES No input is necessary unless you have existing rights of ways or easements YOUR RESPONSES CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT IF YOU DO NOT MEET THE DEADLINE. tsince ely, r David R Sawyer Community Development Director 1 )9E�S- 1Z U7� ATTACHMENT v � � f H ccaditions for Approval Page Two 6. Verification of application for sign registration and plot plan approval by DEHS must be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for the of any freestanding sign or portion thereof which has an area of eighteen (18) square feet or greater and/or which has a height of six (6) feet or greater conditions for approval prior to occupancy L__ 1 Plans for food establishments shall be reviewed and approved by DEHS For information call DENS/Plan Check 2 Plans for swimming pool(s) and restroom facilities shall be reviewed and approved by DEHS For information call DEHS/Plan Check at Plans for underground tanks shall be reviewed and approved by DEHS For information call DEHS/Hazardous Materials Field Services at 714/387- 3080 Prior to occupancy, a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6 95 of the Health and Safety Code, detailing the plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes, may/shall be required Obtain clearance from DEHS/Hazardous Materials Section For information, call Emergency Response/Enforcement at 714/387-3044 A Hazardous Materials Handler Permit and/or Hazardous Waste Generator Permit may/shall be required For information, call Hazardous Materials Field Services at 71,4/387-3080 6 Prior to the installation of any permanent on -site and/or off -site sign associated with site approval, an application for sign registration must be submitted to DEHS f COLTON_JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL C 1212 Valencia Flue, Colton, California 92324 1798 (714)876-4227 __.—--.B-QAR D--0I=__ E D-UCAT l� 2� _ _w _ k e b z u 4-1a , , = ? 9 8-9 MR ARLIE R HUBBARD City of Grand Terrace U 01 President 22795 Barton Rd MRS DORTHAE COOLEY Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Vice President r MR RAY ABRIL JR Attention Mr David R Sawyer Clerk Community Development Director MRS WENDYS CURRAN Re SA-89-2 MRS RUFH0 HARRIS The Colton Joint Unified School District (CJUSD) is impacted MRS PATRICIAI NIX by student generation resulting from commercial and industrial MRS PHYLLISV ZIMMERMAN development occurring within the boundaries of CJUSD at the present time As a result, CJUSD levies, pursuant to California Government Code sections 53080 and 65995, a school facilities fee of $ 25 per square,fti of covered and enclosed space on new commercial and industrial ADMINISTRATION development MR RUSSELLI DICKINSON The above referenced project(SA-89-2) concerns the district Superintendent as to its impact on Grand Terrace Elementary School The MR CHARLESH JORDAN addition of 92,000 square f t of commercial development Assistant Superintendent Personnel will have a significant adverse impact on traffic in the MR ROBERTW MURPHY vicinity of Barton Rd and the school site The addition of Assistant Superintendent Business more than 370 parking spaces to meet city requirements for MISS NANCYA NORTON such a project is an indication of the volume of traffic to Assistant Superintendent Curnculumand Instruction be expected from this development alone, independent of the the cumulative effect of additional development in the city MR DANNY CARRASCO Director Administrative Services The traffic impact and resultingand noise pollution generated MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Director Pupil Personnel Services from the substantial increase in traffic will need to be mitigated in order to protect the health and safety of the children attending Grand Terrace Elementary School The assessment of school facility fees does not provide sufficient revenue to finance the needed mitigation measures, particularly since the District is in the "state match" period CJUSD has been in the state match since Oct 14, 1987 which means all school fees collected by the district are to be contributed towards the local share of building new schools The district has no other source of Capital facilities Funds As you know, Lhe district has previously expressed its concerns on this matter to the City In a spirit of cooperation on a matter as important as Lhe health and safety of the student population, we have requested the City to complete a study to determine what sound attenuation measures can be implemented to reduce this impacL Lo an acceptable level District AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER representatives have also testified before the City Planning Commission _and City _Council on _several occasions CJUSD and the City have a responsibility to protect the health and safety of the community's school children Again, we request the City to develop acceptable mitigation measures so that development can continue without further adverse impact or interruption It is the hope of the District that these issues can be resolved an an amicable manner Sincerely, U Kent Van Gelder Coordinator of School Facilities cc Parker and Covert Attorneys at Law DATE Sept 7, 1989 S T A FF R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING jDLATE SUBJECT PURCHASE BACK ACCRUED VACATION TIME FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FUNDING REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING REQUIRED _ _Se p�t __14,_ 19_8_9 The City of Grand Terrace currently does not pay overtime for any employee's attendance at required Council or Committee Meetings Additionally, compensatory time is given to management for work after hours and for supervision of the County Work Release Program Crews Overtime is paid to our maintenance crew when working after hours The Assistant City Manager, Randy Anstine, attends most Council Meetings, various committee assignments and eight hours per week on a Saturday or Sunday for supervision of the Work Release Program The Assistant City Manager is also the individual called out for all of our public works' emergencies on nights and weekends Even though the City has a maximum accrual of forty hours of compensatory time, the Assistant City Manager has been able to cover most of his leave and vacation time with the balance in his compensatory time account The continual use of compensatory time in lieu of vacation has resulted in an accrual by the Assistant City Manager of 16 5 weeks of vacation The City Personnel Policy states that the maximum accrual for an employee is twice his annual vacation In the case of Mr Anstine this would be six weeks maximum accrual of an employee over five years I have encouraged the Assistant City Manager to make use of his vacation time to bring it within the appropriate accrual amount, but the continual addition of compensatory time has made this impossible to reduce Staff is proposing that the City purchase back some of the Assistant City Manager's accrued vacation and allow him to utilize his accrued vacation through the current calendar year, at which time the maximum accrual will be strictly enforced and it will become a use it or lose it proposition in the future rj tij r'�( h t' . to .P #_3 STAFF REPORT -- PURCHASE BACK VACATION TIME Sept 14, 1989 Page Two The current weekly salary for the Assistant City Manager is $931 per week_ This has been accruing over the past --five yea-r-s - a-t--- - -- ^various-- rates J of compensation because of promotions, but the average rate in the pest five years is $766 38 per week In order for the City to bring the Assistant City Manager's vacation accrual within the limit of the Personnel Rules, the City would have to purchase 10 5 weeks of vacation As a compromise, staff recommends the purchase of seven weeks of vacation time and work out vacation leave prior to the end of the year to bring the accrual within the two-year limit In any case, after January 1, 1990, the two-year maximum will be strictly enforced To purchase seven weeks at this average rate would require an additional appropriation of $5,364 66 STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL APPROPRIATE $5364 66 AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURCHASE SEVEN WEEKS OF VACATION TIME FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER TS bt August 14, 1989 Grand Terrace Parks & Recreation Committee 22795 Barton Rd -- Gran-6Terrace; C-A-9-2_YY--24_ --_ _ __ - -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- --- - Dear Parks & Recreation Committee, Please accept my resignation from the Parks & Recreation Committee At the present time my interest lie in a more active participation with the youth of today Good luck In 1989/901 SOncerely, Barbara N Conley �- 22285 Dove St Grand Terrace, CA 92324 CiAl1tC!G ii' -'ItiA .Tr,,S 5; 5-i4 (/)(CO CITY CF GRAND TERRI= _ _._.-P-a r 1 - d -Rvr t -i e .- m t om e Monday, August 7,^1989� MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT Dick, Weeks, Chairman, Marcia Johansen, Secretary, ___Lenny_Fro_st, Mike Breckenridge - - -- - -- --- - ---�- -___ ___ CITY STAFF Randy Anstine TESTS Tony Petta, Cathy Leogrande The meeting was called to order at 7 40 p m followed by the pledge of allegence and introductions June minutes corrected to read scholarship award was $500, approved as corrected Trails development was discussed It appears that some Southern Cali- fornia Edison easements are on private land under the electric lines so that area does not appear appropriate for development of a trail to Agua Mansa A thank you letter was received from the Riverside Community College Foundationfor the$500 grant awarded to Monica Taylor 'AFF REPORT Randy reportedthat Karen is working on a brochure for Tour de Terrace The City Manager is interested in constructing a Day Care facility The FY1988/89 budget and FY 1989/90 were discussed Chairman, Dick Weeks recommended acceptance of the application of Cathy Leogrande to the Park and Recreation Committee Lenny Frost so moved Seconded by Mike Breckenridge Development of FY 1989/90 Committee Goals and Objectives was discussed 1 To facilitate a Park and Recreation Plan 2 To determine Park and Recreation needs of the community 3 To perform safety inspections of Park and Recreation facilities and to evaluate satisfaction of current program participants 4 To enhance committee member knowledge of Park and Recreation profes- sionally and locally Tour two times per year Lennie Frost discussed the removal of pea gravel from park play area Meeting was adjourned at 8 40 p m Respectfully submitted, Marcia L J ansen I BYRON R MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mavor Pro Tem Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMASJ SCHWAB City Manager HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE Minutes of the August 7, 1989 Meeting The meeting was called to order at 7 06 PM by Chairman Viola Gratson. Those present were Viola, Hannah Laister, Ann Petta, Irene Mason and Pauline Grant. Randy Anstine was also present. Marie Schmidt was absent. The minutes of the July 3rd meeting were read and approved. Motion was made to accept by Hannah, seconded by Pauline. Treasurer's report the same. Randy reported that the showcase for the sister -city plates would not be upstairs but somewhere in the back so as to be behind locked doors. Viola received a letter from the San Bernardino County Information Foundation who's major concern is traffic. Since this is not in our sphere, Randy will give the letter to the Planning Department. We also received a letter from Cal State stating that they have speakers for any topic. Viola had a call from the Redlands Art Show wanting to rent two of our screens. These are very fragile and easily damaged. Randy said there is a City policy about lending equipment. Flyers are ready and will be in the September sewer billings. 11ex� month we will work on the posters. Louise Smith in Finance will be asked to imprint Country Fair on the sewer bills. Irene will have an item in the September Chamber Newsletter. The next meeting will September 5th due to the Labor Day holiday. The meeting was adjourned at 7.45 PM. Motion was made by Ann, seconded by Irene. Respectfully submitted, Hannah Laister Secretary 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 \ MONDAY, JUNE 12, 1989 The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee convened at it'e regular monthly meeting in the Conference Room at the Civic Center _ _ -at 19-Qo_hours. _ MEMBERS PRESENT: Ed O'Neal, Chairman, Ron Wright, Treasurer, Dick Rollins, Recording Secty, Debra Dueller Urs Aeberle, Bea Gigandet MEMBERS ABSENT: Harold Lord CITY STAFF: Sharon Korgan, Sheriff's Dept. Community Affairs GUESTS PRRSENT: Linda Heney, President P.T.A. Grand Terrace Jim Singley, City Council The Minutes of the meeting of May 10, 1989 were distributed to the members present to be read. After the minutes were read the Chairman entertained a motion that the minutes be accepted as written. Debbie Meuller made the motion with Urs Aeberle making the second, the motion carried unanimously. #1 Urs Aeberle presented the full budget report that he had obtained from the City Manager on breakdowns on Departmental Expenses re- garding the Crime Prevention Committee. He reported that there was $178.27 balance remaining listed under Office Expanse, he further stated that a line item of $2,000.00 not previously expended was to be carried over into the 89190 fiscal year budget. #2 Debra Meuller reported that about a dozen youngsters and parents attended a Neighborhood Watch and Earthquake Preparedness class especially programmed for youngsters and their parents. She also conducts classes in latch Key Children, and Block Parenting. #3 Sharon Korgan�again reported on the importance of programs to be scheduled on Drug Abuse, Rape Prevention, Child Abuse and Personal safety that this Committee needs to address for the balance of this year. Shealsospoke of an Arson Program and film and the Dept. Of Justice's program on Child Fingerprinting and it's importance within the Missing Children national program. Sharon has emphasised the importance of the Crime Prevention Committee's participation and planning these programs rather than placing all of the respons- ibility on just her and a couple of others. #4 Chairman O'Neal stated that he felt that a Neighborhood News Letter might be offered from this committee alone regarding all of the thin Pertinent to Crime Prevention. Discussion of the Safety Fair and it COUNCIL JT MSA(3)(a) I-1MIlF11_y >_Ikw111I' 1_ 1 I Ili 11I 0101-11111 1 EI h 1 II,k HIM115 I IF 1'I' 10, l a,_; 1 fk11_ Mae f 11I 1 wit ,w 1 I I'd 1 n 01 do I I,'a j bw C1-Ia1I NIn L-I_I L "to = it - MW _ f FEy. NC Till FIIFIIlI1f' ^ I_2 1rF_II- . A'Art, I _ E a_ 1,111k hil _i 1 1I I� (11I III11 t I_,j I!r 111 h 1 L Li I_'_l I'I1_i I J I1� a I i111III-I. i) 1 i _i`III I if III I I_] i*'I I`IUr_tr I11_1111in H_tl I I_I _T If, II i 1 a-r F CON I F �1_'_ � � 1 1 J v 1 In I _1l I I rr � I. , � I,Ica t, � ,1 hI I. 1 I=k IQ D. t l i 4 I 7 1 l I l h- 1^ k-d I�r" I� i E+11 16 �1I I -I Ilfrl1l}rI�'I, III1 1Ii" ��,1 a r f,_, I.II kill, %ij tlt,(,I I i 1 t d tI Ir_ II I_1i11`,3 1-4 I rII� Lind Ir_ I ri1 311` Jill-] 111 I L IrIEF t 11I_! 1fl I- lit 111UH,fI 1'i11 11_111: FII L ' F I I_ 1,pm A 111-1 ,- �. 1� '- i_ i I I I t I f - _F j ! ,; l r ' 1 1= j I 7— \l l t_ i_ Wl L 11. IT J C ITI V _I I - I I I 4 L 7 D Y 1 n" 1 I,_, r We W Y 1 1 d I - 1111=kII_rJ I -I-IJQ 1 V muf C I to - "1 ! ? III..'1 a to, Ir I" _ f IEW 1 I I It _ -, Id I-- I I L I 1 _ ," I I I (' rl I ,r,I,Ii l I 31" i f I,:_ _ -1 f I_ i I 1 T. a f 1 ,` TO I P L t_Illlf I' I'' - ,r ( I Ij f I I I I I r! 1 1 II_ 1++i I I 11 ill! I+ I- , 1-:4 1 I 11 1 11, J R, I 1 y" 11r1r 1 II11"II r 11 f_,1 1 IIr d I L II; II('I'1_II 1 aI11J I1I_1J1, 11 I,'1I III i k17_ ,_,_,11,(rI_iTF FI Ir- noi Plt f_ i Ill I 1.11 11 L I. TI 1 n, , 1 .I . 1 _I, ' ) a )_ U, 11 ru . VI to INII- t_I' 111a 1 1 g 1,j If111h II,-j a 11'I 1 III 1, r, lay I RECEIVED AUG 1 8 1989 CITY CLERK'S DEPT, ONNI FO AG = m1A a S13 NO-) S T A F F R E P O R T DATE' 8-30-89 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE. 9-14-89 AGENDA ITEM -NO.__ -- SUBJECT. SP-89-1, an application for a specific plan consisting of 23 two -bedroom apartment units in the R-3 District I� FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X APPLICANT: Tom Wall ADDRESS: 22085 Newport Avenue ZONING AND LAND USES: PROPERTY LOCATION GP ZONING LAND USE Sub3ect Property MDR R-3 Abandoned Church To the West MDR R-3 Mobile Home Park To the East - - 215 Freeway To the North I M-2 So Cal Edison Power Plant To the South MDR R-3 Vacant Existing Land Use The site is primarily vacant except for an abandoned structure previously used as a church. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and is attached as Attachment A's Exhibit F MINKIL AGC-1kDA d f Lt\A 0 w A DISCUSSION: The applicant, Tom Wall/Newport Terrace Apartments, proposes to construct a 23 unit apartment complex on 84,883 square feet of land in the R-3 (Multi -Family Residential) Zone. The complex would consist entirely of 2 bedroom units each with 1,018 square feet and attached two car garages. -- -==Since -the project proposes twenty or more `units ( 2 3 ) a specific plan is required The attached specific plan (Attachment A's Exhibit A) looks at site development issues such as environmental constraints and public facilities availability. It also looks at the project's relationship to the General Plan and its design issues. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: The proposed project meets all of the City's code requirements for an R3 zoned project. The project's architectural design features a two-story townhouse design with yellow ship lap siding and white trim and facia boards, along with gray "shake styled" roof tiles (a materials board will be presented at the meeting) The structure makes use of varied roof elevations and pitches along with some protruding windows to provide the buildings with an appealing architectural relief. The interior of the units are well laid out and functional. Each unit has access through the kitchen to the attached two car garage and is equipped with two and a half baths, a private patio accessible from the living room, a private deck accessible from the master bedroom, individual heating, air conditioning and water heater facilities, dishwashers, disposals, built-in ranges, carpeting, window coverings and laundry hook-ups. Recreational facilities include open grassed areas, picnic tables, barbecues and a tot lot with play and gym equipment REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: The following reviewing agencies made comments on this project ENGINEERINGZBUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT The Engineering Department's recommendations of approval are included in their Memorandum dated June 15, 1989 (Attachment A's Exhibit B). FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT The Fire Department's comments are included in their Memorandum dated May 9, 1989 (Attachment A's Exhibit C) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES The Department of Environmental Health Services indicated that the outdoor noise level (measured at the eastern property line) should be mitigated to below 65 dBA and that the indoor level (habitable areas) should be mitigated to below 45 dBA RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO. The water district_ stated _that they do- not have any__ concerns._ _ regarding this project and will be able to serve them -- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON No comments were received from So Calif Edison COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The School District's comments are included in their letter dated June 13, 1989 (Attachment A's Exhibit D) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION No comments were received from the Department of Transportation at the time of the Planning Commission's hearing However, subsequently, they have responded and their comments are included as Attachment A's Exhibit E. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution approving SP-89-1 subject to the following conditions and contained therein Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated June 15, 1989 attached as Attachment A's Exhibit B 2. The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandum dated May 9, 1989 attached as Attachment A's Exhibit C. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate school fee as identified in the Colton Unified School District's letter dated June 13, 1989 attached as Attachment A's Exhibit D 4 Mitigation measures shall be required sufficient to reduce the outdoor noise level (measured at the eastern property line) to below 65 dBA and the indoor level (habitable areas) to below 45 dBA Said mitigation measures may include additional insulation and other construction techniques to reduce the dBA level and may also include the construction of a sound attenuation wall along the eastern property line. 5. The applicant shall satisfactorily address the concerns of the Department of Transportation as identified in their memo dated July 13, 1989 and attached as Exhibit E 6. A six foot high _ decorative block wall___ shall_ _be__—__ constructed along the eastern and southern property lines The existing block wall on the western property line may be utilized for this pro3ect, if however, said wall should ever be removed by this or the ad3acent property owner a replacement wall, six (6) feet in height shall be constructed The materials for construction of the required block walls shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to construction 7 Cable television shall be provided to each unit 8 All heating and air conditioning equipment shall be ground mounted and screened from view or located within the structure 9. The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and irrigation plans to be approved by the Community Development Director Said lighting shall be in accordance with the proposed off-street parking ordinance 11. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee into the Canal Street/Barton Road Signal Light Fund in an amount equal to the rate paid by properties previously assessed 12. The fencing materials to be used for the individual patio areas shall not exceed 36" in height and shall be identified on the required landscaping and lighting plan Respect ly submitted David Sawyer Community DevelopLt Director A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SP-89-1 AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SAID PROJECT __ WHEREAS, the Applfcant,-Tom Wall\Newporl'ferrace Apartments; has appTsed-for` --- approval of SP-89-1 (Exhibit A), at 22085 Newport Avenue, and WHEREAS, the adoption of SP-89-1 incorporates all the issues addressed in conditional use pernut and site and architectural reviews, and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project inaccordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on June 19, 1989 regarding this application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of SP-89-1 subject to certain conditions, and WHEREAS, said conditions recommended by the Planning Commission have either been incorporated into the project or are included in the conditions of approval listed in this resolution NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that 1 The Negative Declaration for SP-89-1 (Exhibit F) is hereby recommended for approval, and 2 SP-89-1 is hereby found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that SP-89-1 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions 1 The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated June 15, 1989 attached as Attachment A's Exhibit B 2 The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandum dated May 9, 1989 attached as Attachment Xs Exhibit C ATTACHMENT A 3 The applicant shall pay the appropriate school fee as identified in the Colton Unified School District's letter dated June 13, 1989 attached as Attachment A's Exhibit D 4 Mitigation measures shall be required sufficent to reduce the outdoor noise level (measured at the eastern property line) to below 65 dBA and the indoor level (habitable areas) to below 45 dBA Said mitigation measures - - - -- - may include -additional— insulation and other construction tdchnique 16"- reduce the dBA level and may also include the construction of a sound attenuation wall along the eastern property line 5 A six foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed along the eastern and southern property lines The existing block wall on the western property line may be utilized for this project, if however, said wall should ever be removed by this or the adjacent property owner a replacement wall, six (6) feet in height shall be constructed The materials for construction of the required block walls shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to construction 6 The applicant shall satisfactorily address the concerns of the Department of Transportation as identified in their memo dated July 13, 1989 and attached as Exhibit E 7 Cable television shall be provided to each unit 8 All heating and air conditioning equipment shall be ground mounted and screened from view or located within the structure Said equipment shall be identified on the required landscaping and lighting plan 9 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and irrigation plans to be approved by the Community Development Director Said lighting shall be in accordance with the proposed off-street parking ordinance 11 The applicant shall be required to pay a fee into the Canal Street/Barton Road Signal Light Fund in an amount equal to the rate paid by properties previously assessed 12 The fencing materials to be used for the individual patio areas shall not exceed 36" in height and shall be identified on the required landscaping and lighting plan PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California at a regular meeting held the 14th day of September, 1989 by the following vote Ayes Noes Absent Abstain Byron Matteson, Mayor ATTEST City Clerk, City of Grand Terrace Approved as to Form John Harper, City Attorney r 22795 Barton Road errand Terrace ilift 92324-5295 Civic. Center (714) 824-6621 Il\ ion R Mattcson M 1tioi Hugh J Grant A4 i�or Pio rempoie jW Dfennighautien Jim Singley Gen(, Carlst►om Council Mcmbcrti T homas T Schwah CRY M,111dgLr JUN 15 1989 W 0 12-8 5121 TO David Sawyer, Directoi Community Development FROM Joseph Kicalc, City Engineer DAIL June 15, 1989 SUBJECT SP 89-1 Following recommendaLions should be considered as conditions of approval for subject proposal 1 Construct curb and guLLei 18 feet- from street - centerline 2 Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline 3 Tnstal1 standard sidewalk 4 Install ornamental stieeL lights 5 Provide adequate drainage facilities 6 Pay all capital improvement fund fees in accordance with current ordinances 7 Submit detail grading plan 8 Physically locate all lot corners and/or establish the same 9 File a "Record of Survey" or one lot subdivision, as may be required 10 Paicel, as it now exists slopes away from Newport - Avenue, where public sanitary sewer service exists The developer shall submit detail plan for collecting sewage on site and disposal of same to public sanitary sewer The plan shall include details of any proposed pumping faciliites including plans and specifications EXHIBIT B 11 Maintenance of pumping facilities installed shall be the responsibility of the property owner 12 All i.rnprovements shall be designed by owner's englneei, properly licenced in the field of practice, to the -- - - ---- --- - specifi.caLions -of—the City- I FOFESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor • San Bernardino CA 92415 0186 5fft ) (- 114) 12 387 4213 — I �� L YD TIDWELL Director EMERGENCY SERVICES Lim TO CCAMY OF SAN BERNARDINO FItONJ COUNTY OF SAN Its Forestry & lire Warden r% r V I( -Of Tice of Bldg & Safety 385 N Arrowhead Ave r� N Ai rcwhead Ave ~`% - --- -- Barr Bernardino, CA 924-15-0�1 UIV J 198� San Bernx�Cino,—���IS=(�1Bi _ - �� �s z� The Clty of Grand 'Terrace (Phone 824-6b21 ) Office /<- (B & S Regional Office) Bui.Laing & Safety lids received plans for checking on the following pro3ec.t BUILDING USE Apts 03NSTRUCI'1ON TYPE VN OCC TYPE R-1 DWARG FOOTAGE PER STORY NUMBER OF SIC)RIES 1 _ 70B Lf_f_AT1U4 (ADDRESS) 22U85 Newport Avenue -OMMUNITY Grand Terrace CROSS STRLE;1' UCH1=/ENGINLLR A E smi th PHCNL �LUDRI:SS 8632 Archibald Ave , SLe 201 Rancho Cucanr-)nga, Ca 91730 xfNrR. Torn Wall I I _ PHONE �DDRLSS E-1 v' L GQ X1 PLOT PLAN* APN 275-211--44 1 1 BUILDING PERMIT I 4N CHECK NO PLAITING Pl,�_7ECT NO 'LOT PLAN MUST BE, SUBMITTED WITH THIS FORM FOR CALCULATING FIRE FLOW :E: 1 R) 2 NTS Y Nancy Best DATE 5/9/89 Tr----.------------------------------�------------- --------------- THIS SELTION TO BE CCX JPLETED BY THE CaNrY FIRE WARDEN------_- EFLRRhD TO C F W RANSMITTAL NO ATE; 5/9/89 EMI VED BY ATE 89-162 SAN BLRNARDINU COUNTY FIRE WARDEN BY NALqCy R F__'S`P THIS SECT1CAq TO BE COtPLhTED By REFLRRAL AUTWR1Ty TIME FIRE AUI'HOR1r11Y )R INFORMATION R0X,ARDING THIS PROJECT, JGIONAL OFFICE SIGNATURE M4TAC,T ABOVE BUILDING & SAFE= D ,IRG AU1'd ONLY -If Plot Plan only, do not submit to Building & Safety as M1� cn ley will not have files on Yro3ect Please send your conditions to Omer x1 Engineer 3P-10 RVSD 01/89 AO �J EXHIBIT C r -- FORESTRY AND FIRE %VARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD Fire �'rotectlon Planning Services • County Government Center IT`O 385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor San Bernardino CA 92415 0186 OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY (714) 3R7 4 .12- 387 42.13 FLOYD TIDWELL, D1ror_tr r � �► ► ao a r, EMERGENCY SERVICES MAY 9, 1989 -- --- C11'Y_O_F G_PAND TE ZPACE Tr-ans-nuttaL No PLANNING DEPA IMENP Plan Check Check No _ AVrN = APN- 1 DAVID J DR1SC'OLL, Oilef-- County Fire Warden - 2�T F 1 RE PRUITC'1' 10N R1.,W 1 RU=S - Q2 ECKU_D PDXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PRC>`7ECT Fl The above referericed proDect is protected by the Forestry 11 & Fiie Warden Dept Prior to construction occuLring on any parcel the - owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements - - - F2 All new construction shall cOnply with applicable sections of the _ 2 1985 Uniform Fire erode kCity Ordinance No 106), Development Code, --- - Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations - ---- larding fires arri fire prevention adopted by the State of Californid F3 The street address shall be posted with a mininun of three (.3) ---` - - ' 3 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance witn San Bernardino -- County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy Posted numbers shall _IIC contrdst with their backyround and be visible and legible from the street '--_ r4 f' Mach clumney used in ccn3unction with any fireplace or any - C 4 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be mint--_- ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire - - - Ccxle F5 All flammable veyetation shall be removed from each building _- i site a minimum distance of thirty k30) feet from any flammable buildiny material, including a finished structure -- F6 The development ana each phase thereof shall have two points > of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for ' routes of escape which will safely handle evacuaticns as required in the - Iievelopment Code - F7 Private roadways which e>ceed one -hundred am fifty (150) in - length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and - shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and - shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building An access road shall be provided (1) _ - I within fifty (50j teet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approvea by the fire department X1 F8 A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 PU08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department -- -Cul-de-sac lengthi shall not exceed -six-hundred—(600j- feet except, -as identified in the Development Code I�_ F9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading M09 ana snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having 3uLisdiction XI F10 All file protection systems designed to greet the fire flow P010 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having Jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water The follows ng are minimum requirements for your proposed development SEE ATTACHED A System Standards *Fire Flow 1750 ,GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure Duration 2 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing J00 Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calcuiation when additional construction information is received B Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Pisei 6 inch minimum C Fire Hydrants Numbers 2 Total Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 lnch Gate k2) I =eE�u__ed appropriate ca - F011 culdtions, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guiae for the Determination of Required Fire Flow " F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection ro12 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 1131, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel, the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be cietermined - by -the fire-depar-t-unent KI F13 The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department EF01 with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required In addition, a letter from the water purveyor stating what fire flog can be net shall be required The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation F14 Nbuntain Fire Zone tuilding regulations specified in San Bernardino F014 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req- U15 uiiements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenx)elts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fiie department zestions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning �ct� , County Government Center, 385 North Arrowheaa, lst Floor, San Bernard- o, c_alifornia, 92a15-U186, or call 714-,jS7-4125 Thank you for your ccopera- on ncerely, NANCY BEST Fire Protection Planning Inspector A E Smi. th Riverside Highland Water 3517 file e following are IXI Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments Purning radius at cul-de-sac bulb shall be increased to 40 ft radius, "Ic RKING-KRE LANE" signs shall be posted in the bulb area and along the drive Submit information on "GRASz>CRL=" Cul-de-sac mast be all-weather surfaced, 1e to support fire apparatus (95% compaction) N NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS REFERENCE x R9-I(;"l NAME A E SMITH LOCATION GRAND TERRACE THE FOLLOWING NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT BASED UPON PLANS SUBMITTED TO `1'H1S OFFICE PLEASE CONTACT THE - - --- INDICATED FIRE- RROTE-CTI )V--RLA-t4-N-1-NG-OFEI-Cr='-91fi `TliE_-APPLICABLE -� - STANDARD AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE IXI Flb Fiie extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1 �XF17 Any gated access shall be approved by the 1: iie Department and emergency access arrangements made prior to occupancy F18 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of sufficient information to review Please submit building plans and declaration of use for proper application of codes I F19 The building occupancy is under the 3urisdiction of the State Fire Marshal Written documentation of review and inspection required prior to final occupancy Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441 I F20 All flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79 Plan review and permit to operate are required F21 All commercial Liquitied Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #j054 Plan review and permit to operate are required IXI F22 Ail access roadways shall be in accordance with County Ordinance #J055 F23 Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards) Complidnce with the provisions of County Ordinance #3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department shall be required In those areas not so designated under saia ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan Overlay Ordinance will apply F24 An automatic fire alarm system is required Said system shall be installed to the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2 F25 Additional requirements shall be, required as noted on attachments COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1212 vatencia UMV70, Uolton, Galifornia 92324-1798 (714)876-4227 r BOARD OF EDUCATION June 13, 1989 - MRS DORTHA C COOLEY President t MRS WENDY S CURRAN Vice President MR RAY ABRIL JR Clerk Mr David R Sawyer MRS RUTHO HARRIS Community Development Director MR ARLIER HUBBARD City of Grand Terrace MRS PATRICIA I NIX ��795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 MR5 PHYLLIS V 71MMERMAN Subject S.P.-89-1 ADMINISTRATION Dear Mr Sawyer MR RUSSELL I DICKINSON Superintendent The Colton Joint Unified District is impacted at the present MR CHARLESH JORDAN time As a result the school district assesses a fee of $1 56 Assistant Superintendent per square foot on covered and enclosed residential souare Personnel footage MR ROBCRT W MURPHY Assistant Superintendent The fees are payable prior to the issuance of building permits Business p y While the District remiains concerned as to the affect of MISSNANCYA NORTON additional residential development on Grand Terrace Elementary Assistant Superintendent p 1'y Curriculum and Instruction School, the District has no objection to the project if the MR DANNYCARRASCO required assessment is met Director Administrative Services MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Sincerely, Director Pupil Personnel Services A-1-9—rrx Greg G Gage Coordinator, School Facilities GGG/lc Joining Together to Go the Extra Mile — EXHIBIT D STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor DEPARTMENT_OF TR N5PORTAII DISTRICT 8 P O BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402 TDD (714) 3834609 July 13, 1989 Planning Department City of Grand Terrace Attention David R Sawyer 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr Sawyer. l RECT J U L 17 19$c, Development Review 08-SBd-215-1.78 Your Reference: - - - - = - -- SF-89=1/Newport ­ Terrace Apts. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed specific plan for the Newport Terrace Apartment complex located west of Interstate 215 and southerly of Newport Avenue in Grand Terrace Growth within the city has created traffic impacts and should be mitigated by the developments which influence these conditions. Caltrans is planning a widening pro3ect for Interstate 215 in the future which this development may be impacted by an increase in noise levels Noise levels ad]acent to freeways are of considerable concern and this developemnt should be required to construct noise attenuation measures such as sound walls as mitigation for development Existing drainage patterns should be perpetuated and any measures necessary to reduce increased drainage impacts should be included with this development If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr Kamel Alexander at (714) 383-4671 Very truly yours, H N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer EXHIBIT E Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced pro]ect, on the basis that said pro3ect will not have a significant effect on the environment DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: SP-89-1, is a proposal to construct a 23 three (3) bedroom apartment complex on 84,883 square feet of land This property is located in the City's R-3, Multi -Family Residential Zone. The General Plan's land use designation is Medium Density Residential (see attached map) APPLICANT: Tom Wall/Newport Terrace Apartments LOCATION: 22085 Newport Avenue (APN # 275-211-44) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that once the required mitigation measures are in place that the pro3ect will have a significant effect on the environment. David Sawyer, Community Developireent Director City of Grand Terrace THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REDUCED TO ALL TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT UNITS 8-30-89 Date EXHIBIT F 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY --Background 1 Name of Proponent City of Grand Terrace 2 Address and Phone Number of Proponent City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention David Sawyer, Planning Director 3 Date of Environmental Assessment _ - ICY9 4 Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5 Name of Proposal, if applicable�r--`Te�4r��r�mP,� 6 Location of Proposal �.����_�A-p����.✓e��r e-I-r- P l7 II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets ) 1 Earth Will the proposal result in a Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? c Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? d The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Yes Maybe No IN 4 E FAI Yes be Z1 o f Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lak-e7 — --------- ---- g --Exposure of people -or property ----- to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground - failure, or similar haLards7 2 Air Will the proposal result in a Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b The creation of objectionable odors? c Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in ` climate, whether locally or regionally? 3 Water Will the proposal result in a Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbid ity7 — f Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? — r 4 5 — - Yes�- g Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or ` n excavations? YI h___Substantial_reduction_in the_amount....__-________ of water otherwise available for --- public water supplies? i Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? Plant Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b Reduction of the numbers of any T unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction to acreage of any agricultural crop? t Animal Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes 6 Noise Will the proposal result in a Increases in existing noise levels? b Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7-- Light and -Glare- -Will-th-e-proposal-p-roduc-e -- substantial new light or glare? 8 Land Use Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9 Natural Resources Will the proposal result in a Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10 Risk of Upset Will the proposal involve a A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan 7 11 Population Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an areal 12 Housing Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13 Transportation/Circulation Will the pro - proposal result in a Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Maybe No v An, x 11 14 Ili 16 b Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d Alterations to present patterns of circulation -or movement of people and/or goods? e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas a Fire protection? b Police protection? c Schools 7 d Parks or other recreational faci- lities7 e Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f Other governmental services? Energy Will the proposal result in a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities a Power or natural gas? Yes Maybe No b Communications systems? c Water? d Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainages -�-e f Solid waste and disposal? — 17 Human Health Will the proposal result in a Creation of any health hazard or ' potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? x I` T� b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18 Aesthetics Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19 Recreation. Will the proposal result to an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? — 20 Cultural Resources a Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site? b Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or oblect7 c Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values 21 Yes Maybe No d Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact areal Mandatory Findings of Significance a Does the project have the potential -_-temdegrade fhe__guality of the_enva.ron- _____ ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) _X c Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant ) d Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ENVIRONMENTAL DETEMB I NAIIDN On the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared 1 -find- that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on' she environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ate David Sawyer Planning D.-r for ignature For City of Grand Terrace Planning Department —__III. DISCUSBIOW- OY-THY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. b, 3 b The development of this predominantly vacant site will result in the overcovering of a large percentage of the soil by paving and structures This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which will be reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department 6 a The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the development of this multi -family residential development in an area that is almost completely developed. This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 6 b This project has been conditioned to reduce the noise level to a dBA reading acceptable to the San Bernardino County Environmental Health Services Department. 7. This project will result in new light to be added to this area However, this impact will be mitigated by the City of Grand Terraces' ordinance requiring all lighting be designed to confine direct rays to the premises and specifically, direct rays away from adjacent properties. 8. The existing land use will intensify with this new development. This proposed use is inaccordance with the adopted General Plan's Medium Density Residential land use designation and will not exceed the maximum density allowed 22795 Barton Road 9 Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 13 a There is the possibility that this development will increase the overall vehicular movement in the area. However, the impact of approximately 46 additional cars that would be added to the area was taken into consideration during the development of the General Plan Master Plan of Streets anbd Highways and was planned for at that time with regards to the carrying- capacity- of Newport- Avenue . - DATE Sept 8, 1 98 q S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Sept 14, 1989 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF DEDICATION -- 11830 Mt VernonAve15 ----------------------------------- FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the City Council Meeting of May 5, 1989, Council considered accepting dedication at 11830 Mt Vernon Ave in consideration for frontage improvements Staff was directed to report in more detail the engineering cost estimate for the potential improve- ments At that time three alternatives were presented 1 The full improvements of the right-of-way to include curb/ gutter/sidewalk and landscaping 2 Potential improvements which include paving to the ultimate paving width with no curb/gutter/sidewalk 3 To do no improvements The City Engineer has prepared a detailed estimate of the proposed costs There was some questions, initially, regarding the retaining wall That item can be eliminated if the property owner allows the City a temporary easement to provide grading, which will eliminate the need for the wall The full improvements are estimated to be $37,404 25, the partial improvements would be at a cost of $15,162 50 0 In discussions with Dr McDuffee there is not complete agreement in the area of potential earth work, the need for two street lights rather than one, and he indicated that he would relocate item no 17 at his own cost which would save an additional $150 Even considering the potential negotiability of these items, the cost for the total improvements would be between $30,000 and $37,000 A final figure could not be determined until the City actually went out to bid If it is the desire of the Council to consider the improvements, the final cost could only be determined with the award of the bid which also would require N6 ,, ;ice -2- Council action Dr McDuffee has indicated that he would only dedicate right-of-way for the grading improvements and would not accept alternative no 2 to allow any temporary grading to be done on his private property This leaves the Council with alternatives 1 and 3 consider STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT --COUNCIL CONSIDER -ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF THE�2-IGHT-OF-WAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS TS bt Attachment PLEASE NOTE Refer to your July 13, 1989 packet for the map outlining the improvements )LFLP-4,A'E ,All I Vt-tiNUN STREET ThPROVEhLNTS - SOB tSTI`1ATE FILE MT VERNON UATE 7/ 5/B9 TIME 9 4 54 TEh1 I ---- -- -- DESCRIRTION TOTAL - -- -- --- - QUANTITY _____ PRICE PRICE CLEARING AND GRU88I,lG------------------ - LARTHWORK (400 Cy IMPORT MATERIAL) -- -'- 1 00 L S Q 1,500 00 • ! 1,500 0( 3 �" CURB AND GUTTER ------ ----'-'-'- 400 00 C Y Q 5 00 = ! 2,000 0( 4 UAWIAULE HCIGHT CURB d GUTTER ---------- 308 00 L F B 10 00 � ! 3,080 O(13 5 P C C SIDEWALK -------- __ __ 50 L F Q 12 00 S 162 0( b _ -' C C UkIVtWAY------------------------ -------- 1,621 00 S F Q 2 75 = ! 4,457 7: 7 CATCH BASIN (,J - 4')---------- --------- 312 00 S F Q 3 50 f 1,092 0( 0 FUNCTION STRUCTURE ---------------_______ 1 00 L S Q 2,500 00 f 2,500 OC `J 191 R C P 1D-1500)---------___ 1 00 L S Q 2,000 00 = f 2,000 OC 10 ______ .A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2" THICK ------- 94 00 L F Q 45 00 = 1 1,530 00 11 G" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE - ---- 45 00 TONS 0 85 00 f 3;825 00 12 - 77Af�IAHLE THICKNESS A C OVERLAY - - --'-- 100 00 TONS Q 25 00 - ! 2,500 00 13 FOG SEAL _ _ _ __ ______ 50 00 TONS Q 85 00 f 4,250 00 14 SAWCUT AND REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM - ''-- 840 00 S Y Q 0 50 f 420 00 15 PEMOVE A C PAVEMENT ----- ___ 325 00 L F Q 1 50 = f 487 50 16 -PLLOCATE WATER METER -------- ---------' 300 00 S F (� 1 00 f 300 00 17 ELOCATE HOSE BIBB---------- ----------- 1 00 EA B 250 00 i 250 00 ",--.. LLOCAIE 4' WI E S POST FENCE ---------- 2 00 EA Q 75 00 i 150 00 19 TREE REMOVAL ---------__ _ _ 180 00 L F Q 5 00 = f 900 00 d0 UPNAMENTAL STREETLIGHTS -------- ----'-' 5 00 EA (2 400 00 f 2,000 00 21 HRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING ------ ------' 2 00 EA Q 750 00 f 1,500 00 1 00 LS Q 2,500 00 f 2 500 00 TOTAL JOB ESTIMATE ------------- f 37,+04 25 L-4EMIATE =-BII - I VLRNON GIREET IMPROVEMENTS J8 ESTIMATE FILE 12 4219 UA1E 7/ 5/89 TIME 9 8 43 [TEM DESCRIPTION i LEAPING AND GRUBBING ------------------ 2 EARTHWORK (50 CY IMPORT MATERIAL) ------ 8 A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2" THICK------------- 4 6" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE ------------ 5 VARIABLE THICKNESS A C OVERLAY-------- 6 FOG SEAL ------------------------------ 7 SAWCUT 6 REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM------- 0 REMOVE A C PAVEMENT ------------------- 9 RELOCATE 4' WIRE I POST FENCE ------ ---- 10 A C ORIVEWAY APPROACH ------- --------- QUANTITY 1 00 L 8 9 50 00 C Y 0 45 00 TONS Q 100 00 TONS a 50 00 TONS 0 840 00 S Y Q 325 00 L F 4 200 00 S F 9 180 00 L F 9 220 00 S F 2 UNIT - ------ TOTALY v PRICE PRICE 2,000 00 = S 21000 00 3 00 = f 250 00 85 00 = S 3,825 00 23 00 $ 2,500 00 85 00 = t 4,250 00 0 50 ! 420 00 1 50 • 487 50 1 00 = $ 200 00 5 00 8 900 00 1 50 ------------- $ 330 00 TOTAL JOB ESTIMATE = f 15,162 50 I TE Sept 11, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Sept 14, 1989 SUBJECT EXTENSION OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ON MICHIGAN FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Staff had been directed by Council to explore alternatives on extending the pedestrian walkway on Michigan As previously reported, the City does not currently have a ma3ority of the right-of-way needed to install sidewalks on Michigan between Main Street and Barton Road We do, however, have sufficient right-of-way between DeBerry Street and Barton Road on the east side to provide a pedestrian walkway as showm in the attached drawing This proposal would provide a separate 31-, foot walkway that would provide pedestrian access the entire distance from DeBerry Street to Barton Road This particular improvement could be done within our existing right-of-way and, even though it does not represent the ultimate development that would be required in the future, it provides interim pedestrian facilities Staff is still considering our options for sidewalks to continue south and will report back to Council when our recommendation has been formulated STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO GO OUT TO BID FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT COST APPROXIMATELY $10,000 AT THE TIME OF THE BID AWARD STAFF WILL REQUEST AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE COUNCIL TS bt Attachments �GUNCIL i,Gt ADA 78 f,1 AIN lwmu w 1) GE r,E:Y 3 i JUH ESTIMATE FILL DAl I 1 lM[ & BAr2 FON PD 12 4,27 O/ 2lOv 9 Ji 41 1r� OF DckaPrioN ([ r_Ar,i.(C Am, GPUFsL,1 l; — — --- — _ —- s c' 1 /21, A r PAVCH NT — — — -----_ _ _ I rlArrzr DI L 1NEATOPS `J t+ C PAVLMFNT PEMOVAL u A C L)Aw(—U1 ————— — — — — —— — — — — —— — — - 7 '31 GN r,L I O(W 1 O 1 i OTAI QUANTI rr PPICE P141Cr 1 00 L S L 500 00 500 00 50 00 TONS @ 125 00 — $ 6,250 00 30 00 EA @ 713 00 = $ 2,250 00 785 00 L I @ 1 00 - $ 785 00 140 00 S F @ t 00 - $ 140 00 /0 00 L F= P 1 00 - $ 70 00 1 00 EA @ 50 00 - $ 50 00 TOTAL JOB Ec)f TMATr- _ $ 10, 04 5 00 ORDINANCE NO 118 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING_— Z-89-2, CHANGING A PORTION OF AREA 8A FROM ZONE R1-10A TO R1-20 WHEREAS, the City Council approved a revised General Plan on December 8, 1988, and WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Districts shall be revised to conform with the revised General Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to revise the Title 18, of the Municipal Code (the Zoning Ordinance), and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1989, the City Council approved Z-89-IA revising Chapter 18 09 of the Municipal Code which establishes the City's various zoning districts, and '`- WHEREAS, the City Council desired to reconsider the zoning of Area 8A, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing for Z-89-2, the reconsideration of Area 8A, and WHEREAS, the changes considered in Z-89-2 were considered in the negative declaration for Z-891A, and WHEREAS, the revised Zoning Map per Z-89-2 is attached as Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting of March 6, 1989, recommended to the City Council that Z-89-1 (which included the Area 8A) as recommended in Planning Commission Resolution PC 89-1 be approved, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on August 24, 1989, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 The revised Zoning Map per Z-89-2, is attached as Exhibit A is approved and adopted by this City Council SECTION 2 Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12 01 AM on the 31st day of its adoption SECTION 3 Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three` (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, -as--designated- for such purpose by the City Council SECTION 4 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 24th day of August, 1989, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 14th day of September, 1989 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof 4 I, JUANITA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 14th day of September, 1989 by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney ZONE CHANGE AREA 8A Z 89-2 EXHIBIT A Date_ 9/6/89 STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (✓f MEETING DATE 9/14189 SUBJECT Appeal of the August 21, 1989 Planning Commission Decision CUP- 89-4, Terbest and Associates) Conditions #4 and #5 7S FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND On August 21, 1989, the Planning Commission approved application CUP-89- 4 for a General Assembly Room at 21900 Barton Road, Suite #120 with the following conditions of approval 1 The maximum capacity of the "general assembly room" shall be 125 persons (including employees, security and serving staff 2 All activities associated with the "general assembly room" shall be contained within Suite #120, no related activities shall be conducted in any outdoor area 3 During all activities where there is more than 35 persons in attendance and/or alcoholic beverages are served, a uniformed security officer shall be present for the duration of the activity An additional uniformed security officer is required for a total of two officers if there are 75 or more persons attending an activity 4 All wedding reception beverages are served, recorded) is provided, persons in attendance of operation Fridays Saturdays Sundays activities, any activity where alcoholic any activity where music (live or and/or any activity with more than 35 shall be limited to the following hours 500 pm to 1000 pm 800 am to 1000 pm 1200 pm to 600 pm 5 No activities shall extend beyond 10 00 p in 6 All persons and/or groups who use this facility shall be given a copy of these conditions and a copy of the Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance and shall sign an affidavit acknowledging the receipt and compliance of same 7 Special holiday activities and hours may be approved by the -- - - - - --- - - Planning -Director upon prior -writ -ten request -- - - - - - - -- --- — - -- -- 8 This conditional use permit is good for a period of one year from the date of approval It will expire on August 22, 1990 It may be extended by the Planning Commission upon written application by the applicant prior to its expiration Subsequently, the applicant has appealed this decision in regards to conditions #4 and #5 Additionally, Councilman Singley has appealed the Planning Commission's decision in its entirety which permits the City Council to discuss any aspect of the Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the City Council deny CUP-89-4 based on the findings stated in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 21, 1989 Respectfully Submitted, David R Sawyer, Community Development Director DRS/mcm RAND TEI Planning Department TO. Planning Commission FROM: David Sawyer, Community Development Director DATE: August 21, 1989 SUBJECT. Staff Report, CUP-89-4 APPLICANT: David Terbest LOCATION. 21900 Barton Road, #120 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit for a general assembly room located in the C-2 District ZONING AND LANDUSE: Property GP Zoning Land Use Subs ect Property GC C2 R e t a 1 1 Center To the West MDR R3 Mobile Home Park To the East GC C2 R e t a 1 1 Center To the North GC C2 Vacant To the South GC C2 V e h 1 c 1 e Storage Yard ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The proposed project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act ITEM 3 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terra(-c, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 DISCUSSION• On July 17, 1989 the applicant applied for a Determination of Use by the Planning Commission to determine if a "general assembly room" is a permitted use in the City's C2 District At that time the Planning Commission determined that a "general assembly room" is a permitted use in the C2 District with a conditional use permit Subsequently, the applicant has applied for a conditional ______use permit to a11owa '!general assembl_y__room'!_use to be -located-a-t-- — - 2k900, Barton Road, Suite 120 The applicant has indicated the room will be limited to the - following uses 1. Conferences and meetings associated with the applicant's insurance business 2 Photography studio 3 General assembly purposes (meetings, dinners, dances, etc ) for non-profit organizations and the ad]acent RV park 4 Wedding receptions (Saturday afternoons and evenings only) 5 On -site consumption of alcoholic beverages (a conditional use permit is necessary for the service of alcoholic beverages for the purpose of on -site consumption on commercially zoned property in the City of Grand Terrace) PLANNING ISSUES• Pursuant to Section 18 66 040 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, certain findings must be made for approval of a Conditional Use Permit These findings as well as staff responses to them are as follows 1 Will the proposed use be detrimental to the general health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or within the City> Yes One of the proposed uses of the facility is to serve as a dinner, dance and wedding reception facility, which may include on -site consumption of alcoholic beverages Such uses have the potential to create loud and ob3ectionable noise at various hours of the day and evening which may impose a negative impact on the adDacent residential mobile home park (located within 100 feet of the proposed use) and other businesses within the center Additionally, the proposed uses creates a shortage of 38 parking spaces (25%) in the existing reta,_7 renter t.e- %--- I I i r rup to 88 spaces (43%) short if the ad]acent outdoor patio is used, thereby creating a detrimental effect on the neighboring retail businesses and overall success of the retail center when this use is in operation 2 Will the proposed use be in]urious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City _TNo `The proposed —use should -not effect any physical property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City with the j exception of any actions which would result from the shortage of parking created by this proposal or the lack of security personnel attending a specific event 3 Will the proposed use be consistent with the latest adopted General Plan? Yes The current General Plan designates this property as General Comercial. 4 Are conditions necessary to secure the purpose of this section? Yes Several conditions of approval would be necessary for this proposal, however, it is staff's opinion that the parking shortage created by the proposed use is too great to be mitigated by conditions of approval, nor can the proposed use's impact on the ad3acent mobile home park be sufficiently mitigated, therefor, the use as proposed should not be approved RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends the Grand Terrace Planning Commission deny CUP-89-4 based on the fact that the proposed use is not in compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code (Chapter 18 60) and the above listed findings Respectf y submitted by David Sawyer, ft RfSEeS'IrC3[lc-ScSUC[IT'P$cS— INSURANCE SERVICES, INC - - - Jun-e-30-1 1989 Mr Thomas Schwab City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Rd Grand Terrace, CA 92324 RE Planning Commission Determination Dear Tom As we discussed, TerBest & Associates has leased Building A of the Terrace Village Plaza The front of the building is to be occupied by my insurance agency, approxi- mately 3,900 square feet The remaining 2,000 square feet we would like to use as a conference roan This roan is intended to be used by TerBest & Associates and their related clients However, to maximize efficiency of the room, we would like a de- termination from the Planning Commission on compliance in the C-2 zone The building has allocated parking for 75 automobiles and would allow a maximum of 150 people We would be willing to limit any daytime activities to groups of 50 people or less, for the hours of 9-5 This would lima„`interference with parking for other tenants in the center We will comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to use of such a facility The occasional late use would be limited to Chamber of Commerce installations and other public functions, so as not to disturb the neighboring community Before we commit to the build out expense, we felt that a determination by the Planning Commission was in order, since the C-2 zone did not address the specific use This room would also be made availble to the R V Park when completed as a recreation hall for possible dinners and square dances Sincerely, David W TerBest TELEPHONE (714) 783 1515 / FAX (714) 783 1966 P 0 BOX 5159 • SM BERNARDINO, CA 92412 r� - „_19 JUL 0 6 1989 J - TED—MoST 0 AcScSOC1ATFTS INSURANCE SERVICES July 6, 1989 Mr Thomas Schwab City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, Ca 92324 It is our intention to use the facility for the following uses 1 Conferences and meetings in conjunction with our firm's major corporpation, TerBest & Associates, Inc 2 Photo studio shooting in conjunction with our TerBest Commer- cial Photography 3 Saturday afternoon & evening reception for our Wedding Connec- tion business 4 Non-profit rental of room for business and community functions le , Chamber of Commerce installation, Christmas dinners, etc 5 The room has been down graded from our original planned use as a Community Hall with a full kitchen facility We are now plann- ing to have a small food preparation room only for catered foods 6 The room will also be used in conjunction with the future R V Park as a meeting room and occasional square dance Eventually TerBest & Associates will probably aquire a beer & wine license through a Non -Profit Corporation to have available for moderate consumption It is our opinion that this use is clearly allowable in the C-2 zone but before we expend the necessary funds to build out the facility we want a formal determination by the Planning Com- ission S nc ely, W Da A W TerBest DWT ss TELEPHONE (714) 370-0330►; P O BOX 5159 • SAN BERNARDINO CA 92412 22365 BARTON ROAD 9 SUITE250 • GRAND TERRACE CkIFORNIA92324 STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM 00 MEETING DATE 9-14-89 - - _ = - =-SUBJECT Fina1- Parcel Map 109155 �TPM-87--EFox _-- -_ Discussion of Palm Trees FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND On December 3, 1987, City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 10915 (TPM- 87-9/Fox) with a condition of dedication to provide 33 feet of half street right of way on Pico Street This necessitates the removal of six palm trees On July 7, 1989 the applicant (Stephen Fox) submitted for a final parcel map On September 8, 1988, City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 14078 (TTM- 88-2/Karger) which is located directly across Pico Street from Mr Fox's property It was Mr Karger's wish to retain the palm trees within a median and form a Landscape and Lighting District to maintain them The City Council conditioned Mr Karger's map to retain the palm trees as Mr Karger asked Presently, Mr Fox is ready to final his tentative map which requires the removal of the palm trees In order to solve this situation and allow Mr Fox to final his map in a timely manner, staff sent the attached letter to Mr Karger providing him with two (2) alternative actions with regard to his tentative map However, Mr Karger's response was less than cooperative As a result, Mr Fox has requested that the City Council reconsider the issue of the palm trees RECOMMENDATION Staff requests direction from City Council regarding condition #3 of Tentative Parcel Map 10915, and conditions #3 and #4 of Tentative Tract Map 14078 Respectfully Submitted, David R Sawyer, Community Development Director David R Sawyer Planning Director City Council Members City Of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Dear Mr Sawyer and City Council Members , Concerning my lot subdivision known as Parcel Map 10915, I understand there is some question as to Pico Street where it fronts my property and some palm trees that might hold up the processing of the Final Map I ask you to please give some consideration to the time and money I have already spent on the many different proceedures of processing this map through the city I ask that you clarify your position, as we are now ready to request that you approve our Final Map Re ectfu \ounr�s, vv/ Stev and Karen Fox 382 E Bonnieview Dr Rialto, California 92376 cITY ^ j / of ;AHD TO July 26, 1989 Mr Barney Karger 11668 Bernardo Way Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr Karger, Planrlul- Dlpa11111c.nt This letter is in regards to your Tentative Tract Map 14078 (TTM-88- 2) and the issue of the six palm trees you wish to preserve As you are aware Mr Stephen Fox is subdividing the property across Pico Street from your property Recently, Mr Fox applied for approval of his Parcel Map which is conditioned with a street improvement requirement which necessitates the removal of the palm trees In addition, it has been discovered that in order for the palm trees to remain and survive it will be necessary to raise the trees approximately two feet to accommodate the finished grade of Pico Street In light of Mr Fox's current application, staff feels that it is appropriate to address this problem at this time Consequently, if it remains your desire to preserve the palm trees then it is your responsibility to complete one of the following alternatives Altei native #1 Within 60 days from the date of this letter, construct your required street improvements for Pico Street including the proposed medians and raise the palm trees the necessary height in relation to the finished grade elevation of Pico Street Alternative #2 Within 60 days from the date of this letter, remove the palm trees from their exming location If neither of the two alternatives are complied with after 60 days as stated, Mr Fox will be allowed to continue with his Parcel Map and its 22795 Baiton Road • Grand Teriace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 r v ----I L,Lju 111A UYU e'ii s wini�tr wttr�- i�c ess ate the removal o tie palm trees If you have any questions regarding this letter or the actions required, please contact me this week or after August 14, 1989 (due to vacation scheduling) or Joe Kicak, the City Engineer _--- __ - - - --- -Sincerely, DRS/mcm David R Sawyer, Community Development Director