09/14/198922795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
} { California 92324-5295
Civic Center
(714) 824-6621
Byron R Matteson
Mayor
Hugh J Grant
Mayor Pro Tempore
Gene Carlstrom
Barbara Pfenmghausen
Jim Smgley
Council Members
Thomas J Schwab
City Manager
September 14, 1989
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Regular Meetings
2nd and 4th Thursdays — 6 00 p in
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
FILE COPY
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
22795 Barton Rd.
r �
* Call to Order
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
--September 14, 1989
600PM
* Invocation - Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center
* Pledge of Allegiance
* Roll Call
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNCIL ACTION
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Approve
Approval of 8 2 89 Minutes
2 Approval of Check Register No 091489
Approve
3 Request to negotiate Development Disposition
Agreement (Clark SA-89-2)
z
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1 Items to Delete
2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Drug Use is Life Abuse"
Present
B Proclamation - "National POW/MIA Recog-
Present
nition Day" September 15, 1989
C Proclamation - "American Business Women's
Present
Day" September 22, 1989
D Proclamation - "Constitution Week"
Present
September 17-23, 1989
E Presentation by Fontana Mayor Nat Simon
of proposed regional gang computer system
3 CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
expected to be routine & non -controversial
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request
removal of an item from the Consent Calendar
for discussion
COUNCIL AGENDA
09/14/89 - Page 2 of 3
A. Approve Check Register No 091489
B Ratify 09/-14/89- CRA Action
C. Waive full reading of ordinances on
agenda
D Approve Minutes of 08/10/89
08/24/89
08/31/89
E Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
Program
F Agreement from Wilden Pump
G SA-89-2 Negative Declaration (Clark)
H Buyback of vacation time - Randy Anstine
4 PUBLIC COMMENT
5 ORAL REPORTS
A COMMITTEE REPORTS
(1) Parks & Recreation Committee
(a) Accept resignation of Barbara
Conley
(b) Minutes of 8/07/89
(2) Historical & Cultural Committee
(a) Minutes of 8/07/89
(3) Crime Prevention Committee
(a) Minutes of 6/12/89
(4) Emergency Operations Committee
(a) Minutes of 5/15/89
B. COUNCIL REPORTS
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 30 P M
A SP-89-1 (Tom Wahl)
7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A Consideration of Dedication - 11830
Mt Vernon Ave
B Sidewalks on Michigan
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION
Approve
Approve
Approve
Approve
Adopt
Accept
Accept
Accept
Accept
Accept
COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL AGENDA
9/14/89 - Page 3 of 3
C SECOND READING - AN ORDINANCE OF THE
`- CITY -COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF -GRAND -
TERRACE CHANGING A PORTION OF AREA 8A
FROM RI-IOA TO R1-20
8 NEW BUSINESS
A Councilmember's appeal of Planning
Commissions approval of CUP-89-4
B. Final Parcel Map 10915 (Fox) Discussion
of Palm Trees
9 CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURN
THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL/CRA
MEETING WILL BE HELD 9/28/89
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 9/28/89 MEETING MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE BY NOON ON 9/21/89
Staff
Recommendations
Adopt
Council Actionl
E.i "L.,, a ("-"111 r%r)i',',i VA
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 24, 1989
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,
was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 24, 1989, at 6 05 p.m.
PRESENT _ Byron Matteson,__Chairman _
Barbara Pfennighausen, Agency Member
Jim Singley, Agency Member
Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member
Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director
Juanita Brown, City Clerk
David Sawyer, Community Development Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Vice -Chairman
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
APPROVAL OF AUGUST 10, 1989 CRA MINUTES
CRA-89-25 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT ABSENT), to approve
August 10, 1989 CRA Minutes.
APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. 082489
CRA-89-26 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
CARLSTROM, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT ABSENT), to approve
Check Register No. 082489.
Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 10 p.m.
until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting which is
scheduled to be held on Thursday, September 14, 1989 at 6 00
p.m.
CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace
SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace
C ,A AC L_ .:.,\ ! 1 EIAI NO. I
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRANS TERRACE P J'vA1,
i
DATE SEP'_ 3ER 14, 1989 CHECK REL.,,,ER NO CRA091489
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF _ SEPTEMBER 31, 1989
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
,
P6317
Z
SANWA BANK OC CALIFORNIA
PAYMENT ON CIVIC CENTER OF AUGUST, 1989
TOTAL,
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES
FOR THE OPERATION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THOMAS SCHWAB
TREASURER
i
I
1
r
$152,0 3 08
$152,0 3 08
STAFF REPORT
ptembef '%i��g'_
C R A ITEM (X) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE 9 14 1989
AGENDA ITEM NO
SUBJECT Request for Agency participation in expanded public improvements for SA- .�5
89-02
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
DISCUSSION
On July 5, 1989, the Site and Architectural Review Board conditionally approved SA-89-
02 Subsequently the applicant has indicated that the SAR Board's conditions of approval
are acceptable and they will proceed with the project as conditioned However, both staff
and the applicant feel that there exists an opportunity for expanded public improvement
of La Crosse Avenue beyond that which is required for this project The applicant, Mr
Clark has provided staff a letter stating their position and how they would like to work
with the Redevelopment Agency to accomplish an expanded improvement of La Crosse
Avenue which will serve as the primary entry point into Grand Terrace for vehicles
entering Grand Terrace from southbound I215 (please see Attachment A)
The expanded public improvement includes an additional southbound lane on La Crosse
Avenue which will provide a separate through traffic lane for traffic wishing to turn left
onto Barton road and a separate lane for traffic wishing to turn right into the proposed
center or right onto Barton Road The expanded public improvements may also include
enhanced entry treatments such as additional landscaping and community signage The
expanded improvement of La Crosse Avenue will not only be of benefit to the proposed
project but will also benefit the City as awhole by providing a safer environment and
an increased capability for handling increased traffic to be generated from future
development along Barton Road
In the past, the Agency has not become involved with private commercial developments,
however, staff feels this project presents an opportunity for the City to enhance the
image of the City by improving the aestetics of an important entry point into the City at
a cost savings to the City and to increase public safety in the area with as little
znconvience to the general public as possible Staff feels this can be accomplished with
CRA AcE:r<<JA ITEM NQG
an agreement between the developer and the Redevelopment Agency to assure
completion of the project as designed and the recovery of the Agency's original costs
through increased tax increment revenue
RECOMMENDATION
-- -- ICU- staff=jt�dofumendatiori -fl at -tlie Cify"-7C�nncil aIfffb ize" `staff- to negoiatey a
Development Agreement with the applicant Said agreement shall include improvement
plans, a time schedule for completion of said improvements and a detailed cost analysis
and financing plan Once completed, said agreement shall be submitted to the
Redevelopment Agency for approval
Respectfully Submitted,
1J
David Sawyer,
Community Developer nt Director
Jul y .� el , 1989
Mr David Sawyer
-i;nII(Il,lCl7 1 y- _j!_eyP� !�}171AePL _TIXnr- {_ter - -
_t i t y—of Grand- I E-r race - T
'279'J Dart on Read
Gr,and I err r•lce, t .a 923'_4
fae I a.CrInL tie street improvements
Dear Mr. ;sawyer
P O BOX 1866
SAN MARCOS CA USA 92G69
TEL (61,049541
Vz
Fer /out- roquesi , I hAve H 3 scUE -ed Further widening of
I aCrossm with the traffic-ngineer n that had completed our
traffic =_I udy I have alsn obtaaineci some preliminary
East i mate= 5 for the wort There are <_,c=vreral options open to us
Fresentl y l ,-aCroose Ave as an avnrayu of 02 f L wide in front
of the- project According to the traffic Study that width
would accommodate the additional traffic of the center Since
this is the primary entry into the City, there certainly
would be advantages for everyone if that road were widened
even further to meet future city-wide growth requirements
Thera is r-appro, i matel y So ft between our property and the
Cal trans i reeway easement than wonl d be available for
widening of LaCrosse lhaL would allow for one tul 1
northbOUlid thru lane plus a northbnuno left taarn lane into
the project, as well as two soatthbo"nd lanes and an island
separator. the additional southbound lane woolo provide
additional capac itv and safety for present and future city
traffic_.
the LaCro 5se offramp is used as a major artery into the city
by all r4sident, as well as cnmmercial users such as Stater
Fcrom A , bast only a portion of that traffic will actually be
generated by Terrace Gateway„ if Ohm citN decides the e ,tra
widoninq is des crabl e, we would thwrefore ast that the
additional cost of the e- tra improvements naL be placed or
the Terre(e Gateway project
Our estimaL-es indirate that Fhm additional widening cnuld
more that double the cosL of thuse Originally called for n
i he tra f f i r stud) l ho"e or L y 1 no I i mprnVeMP ats were cyst i mated
qt laraa,c-�i,c>N W tip the additionAl width, caarhs, and island,
Lhere wrical d also be the nerd to undGrground power lines on
i he f repw"y side of LnProa.p 1I1P total c.uwL coal d e ceeci
A-25 cl M and tnat would bm wbo"1 TI IclM" more than car
GaVway pr^o)ect could 1"stif;
`1 yam "prH fnr =ug9xFt a011S f f thorn IT somP way fn, Lhe
C10 10 tl _aPr i n l patw in Lhesp e t rn c rests , theme should be
F'lenly of financ-iar you"Ifi(stion fnr tL9 involvement. Ther
fnllnwlncl i5 an any{ i,r- �,f hey rnlp��rl clrHIT
"""TTAI .HKA KIT A
f_ -- ---_ _--- -- -
-
rLL-vPr1UP cic'neratur for, LI)F'
('ity
Gross Sales L: st 1 mad' p for
1 uprar e
Gateway
p a l o c 1 U r s - - _ -
_ - - -- -'_....- __ _
~-Mon L-h-1-y
Est 7 mated Sal es
ftuz I ilinq O-Autn Related Retail
Auto Parts -- - -__ _ _ __
__ 400(i
s
90 , HO0
fir(- c,{ o)-P ______ _ ___
_ _ =()()()
s ¢ - --
8t) 9 (- )OC)
Auto Iatereo--__--- -
--- Lt)c 0
s f ---
L_I ^�
4(JI )o
OOci
sf ---
45,000
Offroad Ac-cessnrzes ---
- 2Ocic)
s f„---
40,0(ici
Cel l ul ar ( hones ---- ----
2()UC)
s f -- -
45 qOO(-)
Catal ng Auto Sales -------
11 Oci
s f.___
80 100()
otal
191"0
s, f
405,000
Convenience Store and Gas Station--28uo s f ---- 412"7()i)(-)
Restaurant--48Oc_) s f „ __ _ __ ___--_-- __-- ----____-- 115O ,c 0 )
Duilding D - Retail,
Service CommerciAl
Office
,
Hardware ___ ___ ____--
__-- 6U )t_)
s
f
1( ) , c go )
Lighting ----------_
____ 4"""
s
f.---
7n,00Ti
App l 3 inre --- _-____
_ ___ - 4000
s
-f - --
12c) , (u_)C)
Carpet --_
J
f _ __
10i)
Stervu/ .1 outrun trs - - - m)o
_,
f , ----
90,csOci
<;PPc 1 D l Ly Sales
s
f
K -
Of+ I( - --- ---- --
___- -- - 1._d00
5
t - - -
(-
--- r�tti I dinn C_ - Retail , Service C"mmprc3al OF is t-
(If f ire copiers/1 G+
Spec i al ty Furniture -__-- Flo"" s
Of f icE Supply ___ _ _-- _-- '5tfU > f
I (el i-------__ _-_ - - --- -- L''-c x) r-, f 5()ci0
H"me Decorating ----- - --- qom) s f -- 70„0Q.)
Computer Sales -- ---_ ----- "'�U" s f -- - 60 4""ci
Other Sales - _ _ _ __ _-- __-- ;,... s
O f f i c e ---- -- _ _- ______ --__ y i t n h. f ---
loVa1 -0, 300 .F. 1315500()
Total AnticipaWd Retail Sale= Der month 11.050 oun
Current assessed val up of the e isting land and bull dings is
V356 ,773. It is anti c3 pated that the assessed value of the
new project would approach 150^ci,t M)
1 hope the informatcon provided gives some indication as to
the economic impact of the Terrace Gateway project for the
City of Grand Terrace. 1-his impact, coupled with future
traffic needs of the L i ty 5 sh"ul d provide some Justification
for City involvement in the additional LaCrosse improvemenfc.
Flease let me know if you need mor- information
Si -rel y;
Gary C i r
L�
,
I
Z
O
Q \
m \
w �
NOT TO SCALE
15
t
l
; r
;
1jt
I
1
I �I
1
d
lA CRCSSE
t
lilt
q�AToti EXHIBIT 7
'Poo,, ; PROPOSED
y ; MODIFICATIO
REQu19-E Pctou�r-�s�.c
i
RIPING
�_� �
� ��
�� o
'�- \
--
�o
_ n�
\� � ,
�u
o�
S�-�E
Cu
�_ � _ —�
�`x/�J�.s�F �P
�� C �"/y9Y
�o
_ n�
\� � ,
�u
o�
S�-�E
Cu
�_ � _ —�
�`x/�J�.s�F �P
�� C �"/y9Y
i�
x
�— � --
a
t
u
f
a
i
��
i
jf i
a
M�7 F� �� i (Zc[p�SED ST 21�� 1�-
�� e i
��
��
',
t CJ
�-
�V
r°�3�E _ r .. �r s• - r � t _ - t _.
+t
,
or
all
-i
tLY 1
4 -
4
"DRUG USE IS LIFE ABUSE"
_ WHEREAS, this decade has realized a dramatic
increase in the use of illicit drugs in -San Bernardino
County, and
WHEREAS; _those most dramatically_ affected by
this trend are. -'the _ youth of , our communities with the
national average age of_ the first-time4-drug user being
~eleven and„ one=half years, and'
#I: HEREA`S; efforts 1` 'sto :`combat , , this problem
k. a �<
require }ah+ combined, commitment `�,f,`rom each , ci'tizen, - pri-
or stt a.+e° , s t �� rt""Yt«
vate"organ �zat'ion ands public a encty,, so -that a means of
�V ���
changirfg the+ way drug use ' -is- perceived_kby society is
accompl-ished, and
WHEREAS, -the Allied San Bernardino County Law
Enforcement Agencies, in recogn'izing�-rz ihist need, has
established_a program called "DRUG ;US_E IS'LTFEABUSE, "
-, -in which .-�a11 ,'persons, can, par ticipatda,-, ;in_ relentless
image='campaign;=that supports"ra drug=free,�l festyle
` 7 NOW, THEREFORE, I, BYRON =YR- 1MATTESON, Mayor
of the`tCity- of,, Grand- Terrace, , on 1 ehalf`�of the City
- y Council,-- pledges its full support to `the -,','DRUG USE IS
K LIFE ABUSE",as1?nogram and , shall---commit_-`itself to its
'�tT' +7 I - � ' YA
success - ', nLTWil.,drug-free San Bernardino'.County
t+ .
Y rt
s -
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof
This 14th day of September, 1989
000000�0�
K
--SAS&Iff
Q. I
ti y
~L�
*14
Y �� '�'�• tv- �fir`'
"NATIONAL POW/MIA RECOGNITION DAY" >Uy
September 15, 1989
WHEREAS, America's men and women have heroically served their
country in time of conflict ever since the Revolutionary War and in each of J
America's wars, our prisoners of war have been required''
sacrifices, servin their county under conditions of hardship, make special
g y p, and
WHEREAS, Because our POW's and MIA's have earned a very special
place in the hearts of all Americans due to their selfless devotion to duty
and unflinching courage, we must not forget or fail to honor those who have
served their country so faithfully, and -"
WHEREAS, our Nation deeply appreciates the acute suffering and
pain experienced by the families of our servicemen held captive or missing
in action The loss of a loved one is a tragic situation under any
circimstance, but that burden is magnified when the fate of the loved one
is unknown, and
r�
WHEREAS, we must accept and remember our obligation to these F��~
missing servicemen and be determined that until the POW/MIA issue is
resolved, it will remain a matter of the highest national priority, and
WHEREAS, National POW/MIA Recognition Day is the day we should"
recognize the special debt all Americans owe to our fellow citizens who r`=
gave up their freedom in the service of our country and to the families who��
have undergone a great travail
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand �
Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hb�'-'
1989 as hereby proclaim September 15,
"NATIONAL POW/MIA RECOGNITION DAY"
and call on the residents of the city of Grand Terrace to join in honoring
all former American prisoners of war, those still missing, and their -�
families who endured the uncommon sacrifices on behalf of this country _
yor o e i o ran errace
uCity 1tfothe Council
here
--
tiF
This 14th day of_September, 1989 L~��
6 A
f i1 ( e �ti+--
�- (Eit i of (6ra U. art
1
c��
"AMERICAN BUSINESS WOMEN'S DAY"
c September 22, 1989
WHEREAS, approximately 57 million
_mot` involved in determining the directions in
'�- sectors of this country will move, and
WHEREAS, these enterprising
positions on all levels of business, and
role in the American work force, and
working women are integrally
which the private and public
women hold active, responsible
will play an increasingly powerful
WHEREAS, the American Business Women's Association, a national
educational association of employed women, believes that the enormous
effects of today's dynamic, concerned businesswomen deserve
recognition --not only the more than 100,000 members of the Association, but
all working women, and
WHEREAS, women have made an important contribution to building
the strength and greatness of the United States and all evidence indicates
that the American businesswoman will continue her significant contribution
to the progress of our nation,
IN
contributions
NOW, THEREFORE,
Terrace, on behalf of the
1989 as "American Business
million American businesswomen for their
public sectors of this country,
I, Byron R Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand
City Council, do hereby proclaim September 22,
Women's Day" in Grand Terrace, California
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
the City to be affixed at Grand Terrace this 14th day of September,
Mayo,V/of thd City _oT Grand Terrace—
anV the City Council thereof
This 14th day of September, 1989`
Ali
oel
To
`1. .\\�G lOf
� .
k.
%S
rgr 4V -;wD- 1W i CIL- _1 - I AU 4-
"CONSTITUTION WEEK" r -
�
t w September 17-23, 1989
==R WHEREAS, Our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings
9
of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a
Constitution for the United States of America and A
=-� WHEREAS, It is of the greatest import that all citizens fully
understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in
order to support it, preserve it and defend it against encroachment, and f
Yµt WHEREAS, The Bicentennial of the signing of the Constitution,..
provides a historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall
`-•� achievements, of our Founders, and to reflect on the rights and privileges
of citizenship as well as its attendant responsibilities, and
-�' WHEREAS, The independence guaranteed to the American people by
the Constitution should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and z�
activities during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, as designated ;-==
by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in
accordance with Public Law 915, y�
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BYRON R MATTESON, Mayor of the City of Grand
-� Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of
September 17 through 23, 1989 as3
"CONSTITUTION WEEK"
Ij
in the City of Grand Terrace, and urge all our citizens to pay specialattention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantage ofAmerican Citizenship.In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed at Grand Terrace this 14th day of the year
of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine and the Independence
of the United States of America, the two hundred and thirteenth --
* �` �> e) '$ Mayy of the City of Grand Terrace
<'; H and the City Council thereof. -'
This 14th day of September, 1989 =
�n _
`w r i ji(�Ijl u�E
CITY OF GRA"'^ TERRACE
DATE SEPI iBER 14, 1989
Ceti`'c-)"'Ij 'i CITY
j_ ',PPRO�
CHECK REuijTER NO 0914F
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMniiNTI
P6318
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P6319
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P6320
CLARK'S VINYL TOPS
P6321
RAGING WATERS
P6322
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P6323
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P6324
LYNELL HARLOW
P6325
AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SERVICE
P6326
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P6327
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P6328
BARBARA MICHOWSKI
P6329
PETTY CASH
P6330
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P6331
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P6332
POSTMASTER-COLTON
'P6333
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO
P6334
SOUTHERN
CA
EDISON COMPANY
P6335
SOUTHERN
CA
GAS COMPANY
P6337
SOUTHERN
CA
GAS COMPANY
P6338
SOUTHERN
CA
EDISON COMPANY
P6339
CA CRIME
PREVENTION ASSOC
'6340
DOMINO'S
PIZZA
P6341
SOUTHERN
CA
EDISON COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/18/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/18/89
WELDING SET
RECREATION EXCURSION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/22/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/22/89
INSTRUCTOR, STENCELING
REPAIR PBC CONTROLLER AT BALL PARK
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/24/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/24/89
REIMBURSMENT FOR MUFFLER/STAND FOR PRINTER
PETTY CASH FOR CHILD CARE
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/89
BULK MAIL, RECREATION BROCHURES
WATER FOR PARK ON DEBERRY, MT VERNON/ARLISS, PARK ON G T
ROAD, FIRE STATION, BARTON/PALM, CIVIC CENTER, AND MERLE
CT PARK
I
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/30/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/30/89
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/31/89 '
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/31/89
SEMINAR, CRIME PREVENTION
PIZZA FOR SUMMER FUN CHILDERN
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/5/89
li
4793
2933
2000
3' 1 00
325 38
119 46
6 00
0 64
472 01
318 94
2 34
457 16
537 62
10 23
50 52
3,05� 76
128 93
1 28
1( 35
3 53
11(j) 00
4 25
1,52E 79
�1
CHECK
NUMBER VENDOR
P6342
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P6343
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE
20413
PAM CRONK
20414
CRAIG BLACKERBY
20415
TEODORA KING
20416
DENISE WALBURN
20417
K J THOMPSON
20418
MARIA REYES
20419
LORI ROBINSON
20420
LIONEL ARNOLD
20421
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL
20422
LINDA DUET
20423
MARY ANN PEARSON
20424
REBBECCA
20425
ALECIA RDZAK
20426
DORTHY STALLBERG
20427
WILLIAM FIELDS
20428
JOHN STONEKING
20429
AT&T INFORMATION CENTER
20430
ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN
20431
AFTERSCHOOL
20432
AIRKEN
20433
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
20434
RANDALL ANSTINE
CITY OF GRANS TERRACE
DATE SEPT_ -ER 14,
1989 CHECK REG11_ ER NO
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
DESCRIPTION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/5/89
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE FOR AUGUST, 1989
REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM
REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM
REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
BACKFLOW DEVICE FOR CIVIC CENTER
EMPLOYEE INJURY
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION
REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
RENT PHONE, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
FORMS, RECREATION
VIDEO TAPE, RECREATION
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP,1989/90, CA CHAPTER
AUTO ALLOWANCE, SEPTEMBER, 1989
91489
AMOUNT
415 95
1,77' 74
3() 00
3( 00
11 00
2 00
2 00
2 00
2 00
70 00
13f 00
2 00
00
ic 00
ic 00
20 00
9 07
12 00
4 35
35 15
32 95
46 39
50 00
200 00
CITY OF GRAI,- -ERRACE
DATE SEPi`uidER 14, 1989 CHECK REGioiER N,0
i
i
091489
CHECK
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
NUMBER
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
20435
BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR
DOORS FOR RESTROOMS AT PARK
$ 2,315
06
20436
BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER FOR CIVIC CENTER AND DAY CARE
168
80
20437
BECKLEY CARDY
SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE
396
74
20438
CA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS TAX ASSOC
MEMBERSHIP FOR 1989/1990
40
00
20439
CA PARKS/RECREATION SOCIETY
MEMBERSHIP FOR 1989/1990
90
00
20440
CALIFORNIA SKATE-G T
SKATING FOR SUMMER FUN CHILDERN
68
00
20441
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRANS
ENERGY/MAINTENANCE FOR LIGHTS AT BARTON/215, JULY, 1989
603
73
20442
CAREER DYNAMICS
ABSENTEE CALENDARS
27
21
20443
AMY CARTER
BABYSITTER FOR LOW IMPACT AEROBICS
8
50
20444
CONSTANCE CHAPMAN
CLEAN RESTROOMS AT PARK (8 DAYS)
16D
00
20445
CHEMLAWN
FERTILIZATION OF PARKS AUGUST, 1989
873
00
20446
COMMONWEALTH TOY/NOVELTY CO
MC GRUFF DOLLS
227
95
20447
CITY OF COLTON
WASTE WATER SERVICES FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 AND ONE
CONNECTION IN AUGUST, 1989
31,31
28
20448
COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR SAFETY FAIR
18
00
20449
DEMCO SUPPLY, INC
WORK STATION FOR COMPUTER
78
58
20450
DUNN-EDWARDS CORP
PAINT FOR CITY BULDINGS
28
48
20451
EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
60
58
20452
EXPERT TREE SERVICE
REMOVE TREE ON ORIOLE
580
00
20453
G T MAILERS
PICK-UP MAIL FOR CIVIC CENTER, JULY, 1989
2E
00
20454
HONEYWELL, INC
MAINTENANCE ON HVAC FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989, CIVIC CENTER
1,04.
00
20455
HYDREX PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL FOR CIVIC CENTER, AUGUST, 1989
4E
00
20456
INMARK
RUBBER STAMPS, NAME STRIPS, AND BADGES
184,
39
20457
INTERNATIONAL MAILING SYSTEMS
RENT POSTAGE METER FOR 7/5-10/4/89
g
38
20458
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 7/24-8/20/89
18,071
35
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE SE 4BER 14, 1989 CHECK RE TER NO 091489
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
20459
KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
20460
LAWNMOWER CENTER
REPAIR LAWN MOWER AND CHAIN SAW
20461
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
LONG DISTANCE PHONE
20462
MINUTE MAN PRESS
FLYERS/NEWSLETTERS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
20463
NCR CORPORATION
SOFTWARE SUPPORT, COMPUTERS, SEPTEMBER, 1989
20464
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989 '
20465
PHIL PAGE
I
OPEN/CLOSE PARK FOR JULY, 1989
20466
PACIFIC BELL
PHONE, SENIOR CITIZENS, CIVIC CENTER, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
CENTER, AND DAY CARE
20467
PAGENET
NEW PAGER AND AIR TIME/MAINTENANCE ON PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER,
1989
20468
PATTON SALES CORP
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
20469
THE PETRA COMPANIES
FALL BROCHURES, RECREATION AND REGISTRATION FORMS
20470
PETTY CASH
GENERAL PETTY CASH REIMBURSMENT
20471
PETTY CASH
GENERAL PETTY CASH REIMBURSMENT
20472
RIVEPSIDE COMMUNICATIONS
SPEAKER AND INSTALL RADIO, CIVIC CENTER
20473
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DUMPING CHARGES FOR 7/18-8/15/89
20474
DAVID SAWYER
AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989
20475
THOMAS SCHWAB
AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989
20476
SO CA CITY CLERKS ASSOC
GENERAL MEETING REGISTRATION
20477
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
ELECTRIC FOR BALL PARK LIGHTS, SIGNAL, AND SPRINKLERS
AT PARK ON DE BERRY
20478
SO CA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE, 1989/90, FINAL PAYMENT;
20479
THE SUN
AD, RECREATION TEACHER
20480
SUNROC COMPANY
CARTRIDGE FLOW REGULATORS, CIVIC CENTER
5
i
S
07 61
89 44
32 85
58 96
34 98
05 07
97 50
136 94
131 80
3,064 29
x 331 96
118 46
4 `23
3750
2�O 00
2000
5 00
3835
9,9 6 00
9 56
't9 86
f�
CITY OF GRA",'" TERRACE �-
DATE SEP _3ER 14, 1989 CHECK REUISTER NO
i
091489
CHECK
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
NUMBER
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
20481
TRAFFIC CONTROLL SERVICES, INC
REFLECTIVE TAPE
$ 292
88
20482
TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS
UMPIRES, SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL, AUGUST, 1989
558
00
20483
U-HAUL CENTER FONTANA
EQUIPMENT FOR CITY TRUCK
147
26
20484
UNOCAL
FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT
183
31
20485
WEST END UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL
233
73
20486
WILSON'S FRAME-UP
FRAME FOR COUNCIL PORTRAIT
3D
54
TOTAL
$ 88,370
74
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE
BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY
THOMAS SCHWAB
i
FINANCE DIRECTOR
I
i
.!,` CITY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 10. 1989
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called
to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 10, 1989, at 6 00 p.m.
PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor
Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT Juanita Brown, City Clerk
David Sawyer, Community Development Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills
Seventh-Day Adventist Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by
Councilmember Singley.
ITEMS TO DELETE
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m.
Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 10 p.m.
Item 6A - McDuffee Improvements/Dedication
City Manager Schwab indicated that staff would like to
add to the agenda, under 6B, an Interim Urgency
Ordinance to extend the time allotted to develop the
hillside zoning.
CC-89-162 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0,
on the agenda under 6B.
CONSENT CALENDAR
SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
to place an Interim Urgency Ordinance
CC-89-163 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the remainder of the Consent
Calendar with the removal of Item H.
COS RKAL AG ',)A ITEM 4 � n
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 2
ITEM FOR DISCUSSION
r
PUBLIC COMMENT
A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 072789 - 081089
B. RATIFY 8/10/89 CRA ACTION
C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA
D. APPROVE 7/13/89 & 7/18/89 MINUTES
E. AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE AT LEAGUE OF CALIF.
CITIES 91st ANNUAL CONFERENCE - OCTOBER 22-25,
1989, SAN FRANCISCO
F. NEGATIVE DECLARATION (0'CONNEL) SA-89-5
G. RESTRICTED PARKING - CITY CENTER COURT
2H. CITY COUNCIL AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that an
additional 150 for an automobile allowance could
not be justified.
Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, Grand Terrace, asked
when the rezoning of the Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace
Road area will be discussed, he indicated that he is
opposed to the possibility of the City funding improvements
on the McDuffee property, which is scheduled for
discussion, he made reference to a letter he received from
the Planning Department, in which he was asked to remove
some trees, indicating that the request is out of line.
City Manager Schwab indicated that a Public Hearing for the
rezoning is scheduled for the next Council meeting on
August 24th.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, Grand Terrace, pointed out
that Councilmember Carlstrom should remove himself from any
discussion about the potential real estate negotiation,
which was discussed in closed session, because the agent
involved is an employee of his.
City Attorney Harper, replied that in future meetings
Councilmember Carlstrom should not be involved in any
discussion of the acquisition and indicated that
Councilmember Carlstrom made it clear in the discussion
that he did have a conflict of interest and as a
consequence would be removing himself from discussion.
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 3
John Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace,
indicated that he felt that the traffic light at the
intersection of Mt. Vernon and Barton Road is too long, he
reported that there is a lot of congestion on Barton Road
at the freeway and suggested that the City look into
widena-ng Bar -ton Road at the bridge, he noted that -there is ---
a fire hazard at Vista Grande Way and Grand Terrace Road,
across from the school, he indicated that he has no problem
with Council increasing their stipend, suggested that the
City look into a program used by the City of Loma Linda, in
which a tree is planted and possibly named after a person.
Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo
that the Terrace View School
up to the curb without a
suggested that Council take a
Way, Grand Terrace, indicated
has paved a parking lot right
sidewalk or landscaping and
look at it.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry St., Grand Terrace, suggested
that Counci instruct the City Manager to investigate what
the cost would be to widen the bridge, on Barton Rd. at
I-215, to four lanes, and also bring back ideas for funding
sources to have the bridge completely upgraded in five
years.
Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council.
Mayor Matteson, asked for suggestions on what could be done
about the length of the traffic light at Mt. Vernon and
Barton Road.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that he would have Signal
Maintenance come out and make a recommendation.
Councilmember Pfennighausen,
was first put in, the City
the senior citizens who said
to cross the street and felt
stated that, when the light
received some complaints from
they didn't have enough time
the light should be longer.
Councilmember Carlstrom, asked if the number of accidents
has decreased since the light was installed at that
intersection.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that he would contact the
Sheriff's Department and see if there are any accidents on
record and report back to Council.
Mayor Matteson, asked if there are any plans to improve the
bridge on Barton Road.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that the City Engineer has
done cost studies for widening the freeway in the past and
it would be simple to bring the figures up to date.
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 4
Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that if the half -cent
sales tax passes and the freeway is widened to the
Riverside County line, it would give us a better chance of
working with Cal Trans to get the bridge widened.
--- -- Mayor Matteson,- stated that --he--thinks--an adopt—a=tree
program is a good idea and felt the City should look into
programs run by other cities.
ORAL REPORTS
Councilmember Pfennighausen, was concerned about the
maintenance of the trees
4A. Committee Reports
1. Historical & Cultural Committee
Council accepted July 3, 1989 Minutes.
4B. Council Reports
Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that the City Manager
has indicated in his report about trash recycling that he
will be coming to Council for an exclusive franchise, she
indicated that she is opposed to that option and asked what
would happen if a franchise refused to justify a rate
increase, she indicated that there is a lot of yard sale
signs going up on poles in the City and felt that the issue
should be placed on a future agenda for Council to act on,
she asked Mayor Matteson if he has made contact with
Supervisor Younglove regarding the four-way stop on Main
St., reported that she received a report from the City
Engineer regarding the Advocate School site and pointed out
that there are too many things wrong with the project and
the City needs to see to it that they are corrected.
Mayor Matteson, directed staff to make sure that the
problems at the Advocate School site are corrected before
the bonds are released. He reported that he has been in
contact with Supervisor Younglove regarding the possibility
of a 4-way stop on Main St. and he will follow up until
some action is taken.
City Manager Schwab, stated that if a franchise for garbage
collection is unable to justify a rate increase, they would
lose their franchise. He indicated that if Council is
willing to appropriate funds, he will have a staff member
work weekends to remove garage sale signs from poles in the
City.
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 5
Councilmember Carlstrom, reported that he attended the
California League of Cities conference and gained valuable
information.
Councilmember Singlet', suggested that any requests made of
-~ - -city staff -be—made with the concensus of Council-.— -- - -V
PUBLIC HEARING
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, indicated that he has also spoke to
Supervisor Younglove regarding Main St. and he seems to be
in favor of a 4-way stop. He reported that he chaired the
LAFCO meeting of July 19, 1989 and attended the San
Bernardino Association of Governments Transportation
Commission meeting of August 2, 1989, where he voted
according to the majority of this Council, in favor of
putting the sales tax measure on the ballot, he agreed that
there is a problem with yard sale signs going up in the
City and something needs to be done about it, indicated
that the City has received a letter of gratitude for action
taken on some reported complaints, asked for an update on
the lawsuit involving billboards.
City Attorney Harper, reported that at this point in the
case involving billboards he is optimistic.
Mayor Matteson, brought to the attention of Council that
there is a corporation planning to open a large landfill
behind the La Loma hills, he indicated that the City of San
Bernardino has proposed an ordinance which requires
residents to maintain their homes, and suggested that
Council review the ordinance for consideration in our City,
he indicated that he is anxious to begin the next step of
the Goal Setting Workship, he made reference to a letter he
received from Mr. Brown, of Stater Bros. Market, explaining
that they now have a new american flag which is visible
from the 215-freeway, he reported that he received a letter
from a resident requesting that their area be zoned 20,000
ft., which will be discussed at the next meeting, reported
that he received a letter from the President of the Grand
Terrace Seniors thanking Council for the appropriation for
senior funding and requesting storage space and a room for
their use at the Senior/Community Center, he reported that
this year's city/county conference is October 12 & 13 at
the Lake Arrowhead Hilton.
5A. Landscaping and Lighting District 89-1 (terrace Pines)
City Manager Schwab, reported that this Public Hearing is
to for the formation of an assessment district in the
Terrace Pines development.
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 6
There was no public comment.
CC-89-164 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt Resolution 89-13 confirming a
diagram and assessment and providing for the formation and annual
- --- assessment levy of -a Terrace- Fines- La6dscapi ng and—:11:4 hti ng -
Di stri ct No. 89-1.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6B. Urgency Ordinance - Zoning
City Manager Schwab, reported that the Zoning Urgency
Ordinance adopted on June 8, 1989, established a moratorium
on development in the Honey Hills area for 45 days. Staff
was to come back during that 45-day period and have it
extended up to a year to allow the Planning Commission and
Council sufficient time to study the issue. He indicated
that staff is asking Council to adopt an Urgency Ordinance
of the City Council imposing a moratorium on development to
allow further study.
CC-89-165 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED
5-0, to adopt an Urgency Ordinance imposing a moratorium on
development in the Honey Hills area to allow further study.
NEW BUSINESS
7A. Joint Powers Agreement for Pretreatment Program
Responsibilities and Authority in the Colton Wastewater
Treatment Plant Service Area.
Assistant City Manager Anstine, reported that the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, along with the California
Regional Water Quality Board, Santa Ana Region, mandate
that Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) develop and
implement a local pretreatment program. Since the City of
Colton is the owner and operator of the POTW, Colton will
be the entity held responsible for any violation of
pretreatment laws. Based upon the fact that Colton is the
owner, and that the City of Colton has qualified staff to
conduct on site inspections of industrial waste discharge,
it would be in the best interest of the City of Grand
Terrace to approve the proposed Joint Powers Agreement,
which will delineate the respective authority,
responsibilities and obligations of Colton and Grand
Terrace to assure compliance with the pretreatment
requirements.
Mayor Matteson, had concern that the City of Colton would
avh e too much authority in our City.
Council Minutes - 08/10/89
Page 7
City Manager Schwab, indicated that we are under a mandate
to formally have a pretreatment program, and through a JPA
with Colton, they will perform all of the pretreatment
testis-g that is required. He indicated that we can have an
agreement that if we are not happy with the pretreatment
---- - program, we can sever -or -change the- agr_eEiet: _-
City Attorney Harper, stated that the agreement could be
amended tonight to state that upon 30 days notice, either
party may cancel the agreement.
CC-89-166 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM,
CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Joint Powers Agreement for Pretreatment
Program Responsibilities and Authority in the Colton Wastewater
Treatment Plant Service Area, with the addition of a 30-day
cancellation notice.
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8 15 p.m.,
until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled
to be held Thursday, August 24, 1989.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace.
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace.
t
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 24, 1989
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called
to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 24, 1989, at 6 00 p.m.
PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director
Juanita Brown, City Clerk
David Sawyer, Community Development Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
The meeting was
Baptist Church,
Carlstrom.
ITEMS TO DELETE
CONSENT CALENDAR
opened with invocation by Dr. William Webber, Grand View
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m.
Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 10 p.m.
Item 6C - SA-89-2 (Clark)
CC-89-167 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to approve
the Consent Calendar as presented.
Councilmember Pfennighausen expressed her objection to the payment
of Check No. 20394 (Grand Terrace Road park property).
A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 082489
B. RATIFY 8/24/89 CRA ACTION
C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA
D. REJECTION OF LIABILITY CLAIM 89-03 (ESQUIVEL)
Council Minutes - 08/24/89
Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENT
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, Grand Terrace, had concern that a
Specific Plan Committee had been formed without Council
authorization. He questioned the selection of the committee
_- - - -- members -and asked why there is no representation -from- -the-
community. He suggested that the meetings be publicized and
open to the public. He also had concern that Mayor Matteson,
who is a member of the committee, lives in the area which will
be discussed by the committee.
City Manager Schwab, explained that the committee is part of
the Specific Plan review process. He stated that he formed the
committee to meet with the consultants so they can learn about
the concerns of the community. The committee will meet five
times and after they develop a draft to present to the public,
there will be several public hearings as well as a workshop
with the Chamber of Commerce for their input.
Mayor Matteson, asked City Attorney Harper to address the
comment made regarding a possible conflict of interest.
City Attorney Har er, stated that there is no conflict of
interest because the Code specifically excludes residentially
occupied property.
Councilmember Pfennighausen, felt that it is a good idea to put
together a group of people to meet with the consultants and
suggested that Council establish an Ad Hoc Committee with the
members being the Planning Director, a Planning Commissioner,
the Chamber of Commerce President Elect, the Chamber of
Commerce Executive Director, one Council member, and five
community members with each Council member appointing one
member.
Mayor Matteson, felt that all five community members should be
ratified by the balance of council. He directed staff to put
the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee on a future agenda for
action.
City Manager Schwab, felt that the committee should be selected
before the next Council meeting so they can proceed in a timely
manner.
Councilmember Singley, felt that it is a good idea to form an
Ad Hoc Committee.
It was the concensus of Council to schedule a Special Council
meeting for Thursday, August 31, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. to take
action on this item.
Council Minutes - 08/24/89
Page 3
ORAL REPORTS
4A. Committee Reports
1. Parks & Recreation Committee
Dick Weeks, Chairman of the Parks & Recreation
Committee, reported that the Parks & Recreation
Committee recommends the appointment of Catherine
Leogrande.
CC-89-168 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN,
CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to appoint Catherine
Leogrande to the Parks & Recreation Committee.
Council accepted the June 5, 1989 Minutes of the Parks &
Recreation Committee.
4B. Council Reports
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, commended staff for cleaning
up the City, reminded Council that school will be starting
soon and some action needs to be taken to get sidewalks on
Michigan Avenue for the safety of the school children, she
reported that there has been three more accidents at the
intersection of Main and Michigan, and felt that action
needs to be taken immediately to install a four-way stop at
that intersection.
City Attorney Harper, stated that a motion to add an item
to the agenda requires a 4/5 vote.
CC-89-169 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, to add a four-way stop at Main and Michigan on the agenda
for action at this meeting.
Mayor Matteson, indicated that he will vote no because he
has been working with Supervisor Younglove regarding the
four-way stop and felt that he should be given a reasonable
amount of time to take action.
Councilmember Singley, indicated that he is aware that the
Mayor has been working with Supervisor Younglove and
suggested that Council include in the vote that if the stop
signs are not installed within a reasonable amount of time,
the City of Grand Terrace will take action.
Councilmember Carlstrom, felt that this is a serious
problem and indicated that he is in favor of taking
emergency action.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, stated that she would not be
willing to amend her motion.
Council Minutes - 08/24/89
Page 4
3
MOTION 89-169 FAILED 3-1-1-0 (MAYOR MATTESON VOTED NOE AND MAYOR
PRO TEM GRANT WAS ABSENT)
Mayor Matteson, reported that he attended a meeting
regarding the planned shopping center on Barton Road in
- --- Cooley Ranch -and the citizens in that- area -have- put- a
referendum on the ballot so that that development will stop
until the citizens of Colton vote on it in the November
election. He reported that the group proposing the
half -cent sales tax plans to spend $800,000 to pass the
measure this year, he indicated that he is still against
the measure.
PUBLIC HEARING
Council directed staff to put a four-way stop at Main and
Michigan on the agenda for the Special Meeting on August
31, 1989.
5A. TTM 88-3 (Siglund)
Community Develo ment Director Sawyer, reported that
TTM-88-3 is an application to subdivide 1.9 acres into five
single-family lots. He recommended that Council adopt the
resolution approving TTM-88-3 and the associated Negative
Declaration subject to the conditions contained therein.
Richard Siglund, Siglund & Associates, 364 Orange Show Rd.,
San Bernardino, indicated that the project has been
redesigned to a lower density and meets all the City Codes
and development standards.
Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council.
CC-89-170 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to
approve TTM-88-3, as recommended.
5B. Z-89-2 Zoning
Community Development Director Sawyer, reported that Z-89-2
is a proposal to change Area 8A from R1-10A to R1-20A and
eliminate the R1-10 District from Chapters 18.09 and 18.12
of the Municipal Code. He recommended that Council adopt
an ordinance changing the district designation for Area 8A.
Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, indicated that he is in
favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots,.
John Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, stated that he is in
favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots.
Council Minutes - 08/24/89
Page 5
Kim Hathaway, 22988 Vista Grande Way, stated that she is in
favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots.
Lillie Rivera, 23170 Vista Grande Way, stated that she is
in favor of 10,000 sq. ft. lots.
Syliva Winters, 23246 Barton Road, stated that she would
prefer that the zoning stay at 10,000 sq. ft. lots.
Romayne Chinnock, 22935 Arliss Dr., indicated that he is in
favor or 20,000 sq. ft. lots to retain the rural
atmosphere.
Joseph Palencia, 22905 Arliss Dr., stated that he is 1n
favor of 20,000 sq. ft. lots.
Dick ChurchwelI, Barton Rd. and Grand Terrace Rd., stated
that he wou ike his property to remain R1-10.
Chancey Eller, 23100 Vista Grande Way, presented a petition
stating that he and several other residents in area 8A want
to remain zoned R1-10.
Katherine Katz, Vista Grande Way & Grand Terrace Rd.,
indicated that she is in favor of R1-10.
Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Dr., felt that a section of area 8A
could be zoned R1-10 while the remainder is zoned R1-20.
Kathryn Harmon, 11834 Kingston, stated that she is in favor
of 10,000 sq. ft. lots.
Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council.
Councilmember Carlstrom, abstained from discussion due to a
potential conflict of interest.
Councilmember Pfennighausen, stated that she is still in
favor of R1-10 with an agricultural overlay, stating that
she doesn't feel that there is enough justification for
20,000 sq. ft. lots.
CC-89-171 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to
approve the configuration showing the area split into two sections.
Councilmember Singley, felt that the compromise gives the
people what they need and want.
MOTION CC-89-171 CARRIED 3-0-1-1 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT AND
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM ABSTAINED)
Council directed staff to notify the property owners of the
zoning for their area.
Council Minutes - 08/24/89
Page 6
6A. Amend Sewer Fee Portion of Fee Ordinance
City Manager Schwab, reported that staff is requesting that
Council amend Ordinance 112, Item 17 Sewer User Charges,
establishing new rates for commercial/industrial users.
CC-89-172 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to amend
Ordinance No. 112 as an Urgency Ordinance, Item 17 Sewer User
Charges, establishing new rates for commercial and/or industrial
users.
6B. Authorization of overtime for weekend staffin (for removal
of illegal signs)
City Manager Schwab, reported that staff is currently
involved with the County in a Weekend Work Release Program
which is being staffed by the Assistant City Manager and
the Maintenance Leadman. He indicated that staff and the
weekend workers remove illegal signs and pick up parkway
debris. He requested an appropriation of $8,000 per year
to provide sufficient overtime funding so that an employee
can be available to supervise the work release crew.
CC-89-173 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED
4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to authorize $8,000 overtime
for staff to supervise the work release program on the weekends.
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8 30 p.m., to
an Adjourned Regular meeting, to be held Thursday, August 31, 1989
at 6 00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace.
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace.
PENDING CITY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 31, 1989
An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795
Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 31, 1989, at 6 00 p.m.
PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director
Juanita Brown, City Clerk
David Sawyer, Community Development Director
ABSENT Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
John Harper, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Attorney
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember
Carlstrom.
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m.
1. Establishment of AD HOC Committee for Specific Plan
City Manager Schwab, reported that staff has formed an informal
Specific Plan Review Committee that consists of the Mayor, Chairman
of the Planning Commission, President and Executive Director of the
Chamber of Commerce, the Community Development Director and the
City Manager. He recommended that Council appoint these people to
a formal Specific Plan AD HOC Committee.
MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to
accept the nominations as recommended with the exception of the
Mayor, who will be replaced with Councilmember Singley.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that there should be an official
AD HOC ommittee with a clearly stated purpose and suggested that
Peggy Taylor be appointed as a member of the community at large.
Councilmember Singley, felt that there is no need for a
Councilmember to be on the committee, which would require that it
be an official AD HOC Committee. He indicated that this is only an
advisory committee. He stated that the City Manager is the
Council Minutes - 08/31/89
Page 2
1
Administrator of the City and he should be able to form an advisory
committee to advise him and then he will advise us as to the
outcome.
Mayor Matteson, felt that there is no reason for changing the City
-- -Manager's recommendatmrr; he-c-oncurre-d- with Councilmember Si ngl ey. --
City Manager Schwab, felt that there is no need for a formal
committee.
Peggy Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, stated that
she would be willing to serve on the Committee.
Mayor Matteson amended his motion and Second concurred.
CC-89-174 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED
3-1-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN VOTED NOE AND MAYOR PRO TEM
GRANT WAS ABSENT), to allow the City Manager to appoint members to
the advisory committee.
2. Four -Way Stop at Main and Michigan
City Manager Schwab, recommended that Council adopt a resolution
authorizing the installation of a four-way stop and to work closely
with Riverside County to have the signs installed as soon as
possible. In the event the signs are not installed within sixty
days, Grand Terrace will properly mark and install a four-way stop.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that 60 days is too long. She
indicated t at s e could support the resolution because it does not
state a specific amount of time.
Mayor Matteson, felt that Riverside should be given time to place
their sign before we take action, that he has been working with
Supervisor Younglove, and we should give them some time.
Councilmember Singley, agreed that 60 days is a long time and
indicated that he would support the resolution if staff reports to
Council regularly as to the progress of Riverside County.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that the resolution needs to be
approved so that he will have authorization to place the stop signs
when Riverside has the approval to place theirs.
CC-89-175 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSTROM,
CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT ABSENT), to approve the
resolution with an additional section that reads, "City staff will
be directed to place the stop signs when Riverside has the approval
to place theirs."
Council Minutes - 08/31/89
Page 3
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the Adjourned Regular City Council meeting
at 7 00 p.m., until the next Regular City Council/CRA meeting,
which is scheduled to be held Thursday, September 14, 1989.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace.
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace.
CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
DATE September 7, 1989
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE 9-14-89
SUBJECT DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
On September 30, 1989 our Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Program will expire In order to be a recipient of Department of
Transportation funds and subsequent to Title 49 CFR, Part 23, the
City must annually adopt this program See attached letter from
the Department of Transportation
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL
ADOPT A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NEXT YEAR'S
GOALS IN BOTH MINORITY AND MAJORITY MEDIA WITH A 45-DAY COMMENT
PERIOD
NB
i n. i41f•,f i a l !_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor
DISTRICT 8 P O BOX 231
SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402
TDD (714) 3834609
(714) 383-4565
August 1, 1989
Ms Nita Brown
DBE Liaison Officer
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Ms Brown
On September 30, 1989 your Disadvantaged Business Program (DBE)
will expire The 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform
Relocation Assistance Act (STURAA) states that for purposes of the
Act, women are presumed to be socially and economically
disadvantaged Accordingly, FHWA has eliminated the requirement
for separate DB and WBE goals Future pro3ects shall contain only
DBE goals of which any or all may be made up of WBE's The minimum
DBE goal is still 10%, but also includes women under the new Act
The need for a list of anticipated pro]ects and a statement of the
overall goals are no longer required However, you are required
to publish your next year's goals in both minority and maDority
media with a 45-day comment period for informational purposes
Please be sure advertisement shows the annual goal and the goal
period of October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990
Documentation of advertisement of annual oals must be forwarded
to our office
A Resolution will not be required this year unless your Agency did
not renew their goal last year, in that case it is requested that
a Resolution be adopted similar to the following
"The (Local Agency) Disadvantaged Business Program is hereby
modified to comply with the 1987 Surface Transportation and Uniform
Relocation Assistance Act which presumes that women are socially
and economically disadvantaged individuals whose participation may
be counted in attaining DBE goals As such separate WBE goals will
no longer be used and the terms "DB and WBE" in the current adopted
program shall be understood to mean DBE "
A copy of the Resolution and advertisement must also be forwarded
to our office
Ms Brown
Page 2
August 1, 1989
As this is a FHWA requirement for all federally funded pro3ects,
it is important that the DBE goals be kept current Failure to
comply will result in your inability to advertise present -or- fu-ture
-r DeidtTa�ly7��fund-e-d
If you have any questions, please call Mary Patterson at (714) 383-
4565
Very truly yours,
J L BALCOM
Chief, Local Streets and Roads
W 0 12 415
STAFF REPORT,
Attached you will find a copy of an executed "Storm Drain Construction
r_ _-Agreement" hetween Wilden Pump and Engineering_- Company_and the__C-ity of. -
Grand -Terrace
Under the provisions of this agreement, City would be permitted to
increase the storm flows through Wilden Pump property and discharge into
that system up to 55 cubic feet per second (c f s ) of surface run—off
In 1978, an upstream developer, County of San Bernardino and the City of
Grand Terrace were named in a lawsuit and a temporary injunction was
issued against increasing the rate of discharge through that property
This agreement will allow the City to increase the surface run—off to 55
c f s and that rate of flow would be adequate for all of the run—off
tributary from the properties upsteam under ultimate development, based
on current general plan and zoning
Staff recommends that
1 City Council approve the subject agreement
2 Authorize the Mayor to sign it
r-ro , r i , ( i i�tia c-rrns — � r
rt 1CONSTRtJCTION AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City
of Grand Terrace, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Wilden Pump
and Engineering Company, hereinafter referred to as (WILDEN)
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, WILDEN has constructed and there presently exists a
storm drain system through certain property owned by WILDEN,
specifically Assessor's Parcel Nos 277-101-36, 277-101-62 and
277-101-63, and
WHEREAS, said storm drain system was constructed to accept
run-off from upstream properties directed to the subject property
through a separate storm drain system located in existing public
rights -of -way and easements, previously constructed by other than
WILDEN, AND
WHEREAS, said previoully constructed system is inadequate in
capacity to provide for that tributary drainage to be conveyed to
the system constructed by WILDEN, and,
WHEREAS, without replacement, the inadequate tributary storm
drain system has the potential to cause property damage to those
properties located upstream of the system constructed by WILDEN,
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to construct a storm drain system
adequate in size to eliminate said drainage problem and potential
upstream property damage and to replace said existing system
constructed by other than WILDEN with a system adequate in size to
eliminate said drainage problem and potential property damage,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS
1 The foregoing Recitals are true and correct
2 The City agrees to construct a storm drain system
replacing that storm drain system constructed by other
tea-"n WILDEN at no cost to WILDEN, to convey tributary
of the storm flows through the replacement system to
equal 50 c f s , which is less than the capacity 71
c f s of the WILDEN constructed system Under no
circumstances will the system constructed by the CITY
exceed 55 c f s
3 CITY will, at no cost to WILDEN, replace any facilities
disrupted on WILDEN property in condition equal to or
better than, prior to construction
4 The recompaction of material removed shall be such that
no failures in the surface shall occur
5 WILDEN agrees to accept the tributary drainage conveyed
by the reconstructed system into the existing system
which WILDEN constructed
6 WILDEN agrees to allow the CITY to connect said replaced
system at no cost to the CITY, other than those costs
associated with the actual physical construction of the
connection
7 CITY agrees to indemnify and hold harmless WILDEN
against any claims arising out of the CITY'S
construction of the replacement drainage system
resulting from the intentional or negligent acts
of the CITY'S officers, employees, or agents related to
the construction of said replacement drainage system
DATED
DATED _ C�
BYRON R MATTESON
MAYOR
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
WILDEN PUMP AND ENGINEERING CO
BY
STAFF REPORT
--DATE -"September-7; 1989 --- —
C R A ITEM( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE 9 14 1989
AGENDA ITEM NO
SUBJECT Review of Negative Declaration for Site and Architectural SA 89 2 A
Mixed Retail and Office Center to be located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue TS
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
DISCUSSION
On July 5, 1989, the Site and Architectural Review Board approved SA-89-02, a 92,600
sq ft mixed retail and office center to be located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue
Additionally, the SAR Board reviewed the project's Negative Declaration and
recommended its approval by the City Council The SAR Board's approval of SA-89-02
is subject to the following conditions of approval
1 The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the
siteplan and architectural design as approved by the Site and
Architectural Review Board on July 5, 1989 as illustrated in
Attachment A Minor changes and/or clarifications may be made by
the Planning Department
2 The architectural design of the proposed convenience store shall be
similar in nature to buildings A, B, and C and shall be submitted for
independent Site and Architectural Review at the time said
convenience store is ready for construction
3 The architectural design of the proposed restaurant shall be
submitted for independent Site and Architectural Review at the time
said restaurant is ready for construction
4 The proposed traffic mitigation measures identified in the "Traffic
Impact Study" prepared by J F Davidson and Associates (Attachment
�~ B) shall be incorporated into the proposed project and shall be in
place prior to the issuance of occupancy for any of the proposed
buildings
5 The applicant shall comply with all the comments recommended by
the City Engineer listed 1n his Memorandum dated February 1, 1989
and attached as Attachment C
6 The concerns of the County Traffic Engineer stated in his letter
dated December 13, 1988 and the State Department of
Transportation stated in their letter dated January 27, 1989
(Attachment E) shall be reviewed and incorporated in the "Traffic
Impact Study" to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
7 The requirements of the Forestry and Fire Warden Department as
listed in their letter dated January 29, 1989 (Attachment F) shall be
complied with
8 The applicant shall submit detailed water plans for approval to the
Riverside Highland Water District in accordance with their letter
dated January 30, 1989 and attached as Attachment G
9 The requirements of the Department of Environmental Health
Services recommended in their response received February 13, 1989
(Attachment H) shall be complied with
10 The applicant shall pay the appropriate fees to the Colton Umfied
School District
11 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and
irrigation plan for approval by the Planning Department
12 A coordinated sign program for the entire center shall be developed
to the satisfaction of the Planning Department All signs shall be
applied for in accordance with the City's sign permit process
13 All aspects of the proposed project including landscaping and
irrigation systems, and building maintenance shall be maintained in
a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals
and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace
RECOMMENDATION �~
The Planning Commission and the Planning Department recommend the City Council
approve the attached Negative Declaration for SA-89-02
Respectfully- Submitted,
,ems' ------
David Sawyer,
Community Developm nt Director
M
airy_
6?'F` �.
TER R c Plan nzng
Department
�TO.,-..� _� T Planning Commission
FROM, David Sawyer, Community Development Director
DATE July 5, 1989
SUBJECT Staff Report, SA-89-2
APPLICANT Gary Clark
LOCATION 12028 La Crosse Ave
REQUEST Site and Architectural Review of a proposed 92,600
square foot mixed retail and office center
ZONING AND LANDUSE
Property
GP
Zoning
Land Use
SubDect Property
GC
C2
Commercial
with 2/3 of
the site
vacant
To the West
GC
C2
Commercial
and proposed
RV Park
To the East
_
-
215 Freeway
To the North
LDR
R2
S i n g 1 e
Family Homes
To the South
GC
C2
Commercial
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proDect and is
attached as Attachment J
P C STAFF REPORT
22795 Batton Road • Grand leiidce, Calitoinza 92324-5295 a (714) 824-6621
The applicant is proposing to build a 92,600 square foot mixed
retail and office center The subject site contains 6 1 acres
(265,716 square feet) and approximately 1/3 of the site is
currently developed with office and retail uses located in
approximately 15 to 20 year old structures The proposal calls for
three (3) major buildings plus a site for a restaurant and a
—convenienoe--stor_e/ga_s-_s-t
Building A (See Attachment A) is a 19,100 square foot single story
structure which will house upscale auto related retail businesses
such as a major tire dealer, an auto parts store, an auto stereo
store and similar businesses Buildings B (37,600 sq ft ) and C
(28,300 sq ft ) are two story structures and will provide space
for retail/service commercial businesses on the ground floors with
additional retail space as well as office space available on the
second floors The restaurant facility is proposed at 4,800 square
feet and the convience store is proposed at 2,800 square feet The
project has been divided into two (2) phases for construction
Purposes with buildings B, C and the restaurant site in phase 1 and
the remainder in phase 2
The project meets all current zoning code requirements including
the recently approved off-street parking chapter
The architecture of buildings A. B and C will consist of concrete
tilt up styled construction with numerous columns, balconies and
_ covered walkways The body of the buildings as well as various
relief features such as the columns will be colored one of three
(3) shades of gray, two (2) shades of green will provide accent on
the awnings and handrails while the roof constructed of bronse
metal will provide additional contrast (colored elevations, a
materials board and photos of a similarly designed project will be
available at the time of your meeting)
The architecture of the convience store will be similar to
buildings A, B and C while the architecture of the restaurant is
not detailed at this time so as to remain flexible in consideration
of individual needs of the future tenant
As part of the review of this project, a "Traffic Impact Study" was
prepared by J F Davidson and Associates This report looks at the
proposed project and analyzes its impact on the local traffic
system and makes recommendations to mitigate these impacts The
conclusions and recommendations from this report are attached as
Attachment B
REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS
The following responses have been recieved from the City's
Reviewing Agencies
F
The Engineering/Building & Safety Department's comments are
included in their memorandum dated February 1, 1989 and attached
as Attachment C These comments address the issues of public
improvements, grading and drainage facilities, and traffic impact
COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
The San Bernardino County Traffic Engineer which provides services
to the City on a contract/as needed basis was asked to review the
"Traffic Impact Study" for this project and his comments are
included in his letter dated December 13, 1988 and attached as
Attachment D
STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The State Department of Transportation comments are included in
their letter dated January 27, 1989 and attached as Attachment E
FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT
The Fire Department's comments are included in their memorandum
dated January 29, 1989 and attached as Attachment F
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER DISTRICT
The Water District's comments are included in their letter dated
January 30, 1989 and attached as Attachment G
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRNOMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
The Department of Environmental Health Services' comments are
included in their response recieved February 13, 1989 and attached
as Attachment H
COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
The School District's comments are included in their letter dated
February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The Planning Department recommends the following conditions of
approval,
1 The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance
with the slteplan and architectural design as approved
by the Site and Architectural Review Board on July 5,
1989 and as illustrated in Attachment A Minor changes
and/or clarifications may be made by the Planning
Department
shall be similar in nature to buildings A, Bland eCstore
3 The architectural design of the proposed restaurant shall
be submitted for independent Site and Architectural
Review at the time said restaurant is ready for
construction
_== Thy =p-O`p'��6d=-tra-ff=ic= rnIt- t o%= fi� ur s�-ic ent ne Tn==--
the "Traffic Impact Study" prepared by J F Davidson
and Associates (Attachment B) shall be incorporated into
the proposed pro3ect and shall be in lace
p prior to the
issuance of occupancy for any of the proposed buildings
5 The applicant shall comply with all comments recommended
by the City Engineer listed in his Memorandum dated
February 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment C
5 The concerns of the County Traffic Engineer stated in his
letter dated December 13, 1988 (Attachment D) and the
State Department of Transportation stated in their letter
dated January 27, 1989 (Attachment E) shall be reviec,ed
and incorporated in the "Traffic Impact Study" to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer
6 The requirements of the Forestry and Fire Warden
Department as listed in their letter dated January 29,
1989 (Attachment F) shall be complied with
7 The applicant shall submit detailed water plans for
approval to the Riverside Highland Water District
inaccordance with their letter dated January 30, 1989 and
attached as Attachment G
8 The requirements of the Department of Environmental
Health Services recommended in their response recieved
February 13, 1989 (Attachment H) shall be complied with
9 The applicant shall pay the appropriate fees to the
Colton Unified School District
10 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting
and irrigation plans for approval by the Planning
Department
10 A coordinated sign program for the entire center shall
be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department All signs shall be applied for inaccordance
with the City's sign permit process
11 All aspects of the proposed project including landscaping
and irrigation systems, and building maintenance shall
be maintained in a clean and functional manner to tt-e
satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance
i
1 vt d1. an t e overall goals and objectives
of the City of Grand Terrace
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends the Grand Terrace Site and
Architectural Review Board approve SA-89-2 subject to the
11s�tcd``�ove
Respectf y submitted by
David Sawyer,
Community Developm nt Director
l
Ir
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
TERRACE GATEWAY
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER, 1988
Prepared for
Mr Gary Clark
P 0 Box 1866
San Marcos, CA 92069
Prepared by
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC
3426 Tenth Street
Riverside, CA 92502
cQ,of�ss,\
�S B Op�9l
�P
ctz
tC
3
E+n
1 7
MCA L
ATTACHMENT B
Table 3 shows that with the addition of project traffic to
existing traffic on the existing roadway that all five (5)
intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels
of service except for the afternoon peak at Barton Road and
LaCrosse (southbound ramps) The P M peak hour at that
—intersection, is ex ct d_ c2__opera+p____at a _Lever_J-of. Servj-ce-=E=
with the existing roadway configuration
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The development of the proposed project will result in a
cumulative impact to the adjacent street network However,
with one exception, the impact will not be significant when
the resulting projected levels of service are considered
With the addition of project traffic onto the existing
street system, the intersections would continue to operate
at acceptable levels of service except for the intersection
of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue during the afternoon
peak traffic hour During that time period, the
intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service E,
or capacity
In order to change the Level of Service at the one
intersection to an acceptable level, it is- recommended that
the southbound through/left lane be split to provide
separate left and through lanes The improvement will
change the P M peak hour level of service from "E" to "D"
An acceptable level of service will then be anticipated at
all five intersections for both morning and afternoon peak
traffic hours
The site access was also reviewed The only unusual aspect
of the site access is the fact that La Crosse Avenue is, in
fact, the extension of the southbound off -ramp from the
freeway to Barton Road The development of the project will
impose additional traffic movements on the roadway,
including left turns across the ramp traffic It is also
expected that a percentage of the southbound traffic from
the ramp will be slowing to turn into the project site In
order to increase safety for southbound vehicles and
crossing traffic, it is recommended that Caltrans consider
installing an "exit speed" sign at the entrance to the off -
ramp from the freeway The advance warning would provide an
opportunity for ramp traffic to reduce speed and advise that
the reduced speed was necessary
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
1 Provide an additional southbound lane at Barton Road and
La Crosse Avenue to separate southbound left and through
movements This will Primarily require restriping.
Some minor widening may be required (see Exhibit 7)
t
2 Provide an "exit speed" warning sign at the entrance to
the southbound off -ramp from the freeway (Caltrans)
_ t-y-p e- t�7rr
Crosse Avenue south of its connection with the
southbound off -ramp The higher design of the street
r type entrance will reduce slowing at the entrance and
decrease the impact on southbound traffic
h
G
� � C
1{ F
1 � Q
c
C �
i
i lC
I
rl �
Ilh
h
LA CR05SE
To,K— EXHIBIT 7
PROPOSED STRIPING
ry MODIFICATION
„--------------
�-
Mayor
g +l L y I
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
Mayor Pro Tem
r) 1 1 ti
FEB p
Council Members
HUGHJ GRANT
PLANNiNu Uti'MIMcNI
DENNIS L EVANS
SUSAN CRAWFORD
THOMAS J SCHWAB
City Manager
W 0 12-8 5113
r0 David Sawyer, Planning Director
FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer /
DATE February 1, 1989
SUBJECT SA 89-02
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for
the above project
1 Dedicate additional right-of-way as may be necessary to provide for the
following
(a) Total Roadway Width - curb separation of 42 feet
(b) Parkway width of 12 feet
This will provide one lane of traffic in each direction and a turning
lane
(c) In the transition area of LaCrosse North of Barton, submit design and
dedicate accordingly for 14 foot lanes as indicated in the traffic study
Please note that the anticipated service level at that intersection upon
completion of these improvements is "D”, below acceptable planning
standards of current County planning
(No existing facilities are indicated in the traffic study or the plans
submitted by the architect, nor are any dimensions shown indicating the
relationship of existing improvements to the existing right-of-way lines,
Caltrans and City )
2 Construct standard curb and gutter based traffic study, recommendation of
San Bernardino County and Caltrans and Item 1 above
3 Install
standard sidewalk
along frontage of subject properties
4 Install
ornamental street
lights
ATTACHMENT C
22795 BARTnN RnAn . rnQAt.ln -rcnnr,r-r7 I.
Recommendations for SA 89-02
February 1, 1989
Page 2
S Install paving as may be required from the lip of the gutter to street T ` center line
6 Provide adequate drainage facilities
7 Install standard driveway approaches
8 Pay all fees pursuant to the applicable ordinances
9 Provide street striping plan and stripe in accordance wiLh approved plan
10 All improvements shall be designed by the owner's civil engineers to the
specifications of the City
JK/ct
TRANSPORTATION/FL- JD
DEPARTMENT
-,ONTROL
825 East Third Street • San Bernardino CA 92415-0835 • (714) 387 2800
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN(
ENVIRONMENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
KEN A MILLER
Director
1' M
C , 0
December 13, 1988
.- _ _- t<'= � __ � ._ .✓ �- ra _o-w ?- ""''�",^' Y-"t_.itry�-_w�.s-v--, v. .. ._.._...... __._.--..,--. __-_.�.... �,-_-...- _-m_ �_.__... __-......_._..�..-<-«- ... r/..v���i � -� ti f7
L/Af/-kT
City of Grand 'Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
ATIN DAVID SAWYER,
Co=mlty Development Director
Dew Y- S=Y7yer
In response to your letter dated November 22, 1988, requesting comments
for the Traffic Impact Study submitted by J F Davidson Associates, Inc
for the Terrace Gateway development in the City of Grand Terrace We
offer the following ccm rents
The plot plan shows three driveways for this develc nent The driveway
furthest to the south may pose a conflict because of the proximity to the
intersection of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue. We recarmex-)d the
driveway be eliminated or designed in such a way to preclude traffic from
making left turns in or out, this is shown as a riot out only driveway in
exhibit 7 but was not mentioned in the study
There were no expansion factors given for existing traffic and there were
no Cumulative effects accounted for
Level of service was analyzed and given in table 3 It should be noted
that the minty of San Bernard-ino is no longer planning for level of
service D but is planning for level of service C
Consideration should be given to rewire a full width street standard on
T use Avezuie T-,s shyold inc" Lud6 une larP- in each d�rectiuli w��t
emergency shoulders and a left turn lane to acccmrodate turns for both
directions
The study did not analyze any intersection to the west of the project
The intersections of Barton Road and Grand Terrace Road, Barton Road and
La Cadena Drive and Barton Road at the Southern Pacific railroad crossing
should be analyzed for traffic impacts
ATTACHMENT D
0CAP r, , ,
City of Grand Terrace
Attn David Sawyer
DeOen ber 13, 1988
It was noted that the proDect distribution as shown in exhibit 4 indicates
that this local dial develognent is anticipated to generate 701 of
Its patrons from I-215 freeway, 10� frcan the La C'ulena area and only 20�
frarn the Grand Terrace carmrnznity I assume these are }wed on a marketing
analysis for the specific types of businesses as shah In eNdubit 2
Should these change a new traffic analysis may be necessary
Thank you for the opportunity to review and ccrment on the proDect
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me
Very truly yours,
�FILI'�b R / GQUjN�Tfljf,
Traffic Engineer
FRG/vs
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402
TDD (714) 3834609
January 27, 1989
FEB 0 j I� , ,
YLhIVIYiIrU U�rhrllnlc(rl
Planning Department
City of Grand Terrace
Attention David R Sawyer
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Mr Sawyer
Development Review
08-SBd-215-1 3
Your Reference
(Gary Clark)
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed development
of a service commercial center located at 12028 La Crosse Avenue
(Barton Road) in Grand Terrace
This proposal is slightly removed from an existing state highway
Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does
not appear to have a significant effect on the State highway
system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of
continued development in this area Any measures necessary to
mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be
provided prior to or with development of this area
The previous review of the traffic analysis by Mr Don Allen will
suffice the requirements of traffic signing
If additional information is desired, please call Mr Thomas J
Neville at (714) 383-4384
Very truly yours,
9
H N LEWANDOWSKI
District Permits Engineer
ATTACHMENT E
FORESTRY AND FIF', . WP..�DEN DEPARTMET
Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN
385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415 0186 OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
I7141 M -421Z 87-421 nyn Tm.,,...
DAVID J DRISCOLL, Chief
z �1 EMERGENCY SERVICES
Al
DATE
JANUARY 29, 1989
Sn
i 4 [Ile co-) "
OF -GI ND-TE RACE
Planning Dept APN --
�-- �
t_ -
1
DAV1,D J. DRISCOLL, Chief
��-
County Fire Warden
SUBJECT FIRE Pi-oTD moN REQUIREmENZ'S
CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT
C y of (,)a � -
1 X 1
Fl The above re£ei enced project is protected by the Pores try-
cr-
3F001
& Fire Warden Dept Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the
owner shall contdct the fire department for verification of current fire
-
protection development requirements
IXI
F2, All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the
517002
1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No 106), Development Code,
Cortnunity Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of CdliEornia
1`
F3 The street address shall be ( )
posted with a minimum of three 3
-'
5F003
inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino
County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy Posted numbers shall
contrast with their background and be visible and legible from thu street-
1X1
F4 Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any--
517004
heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint-
,)r - -
ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire
,
Code
1 XI
F5 All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each bl>> ]ding
,.,
3F005
site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet fLom any flammable building
r
material, including a finished structure
'
1X1
F6 The development and each phase thereof shall have two points
r
1F006
of vehicular access for fire and other emeryency equipment, and for
r
routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the
Development Code.,-
IX1
F7. PrivaLe roadways which exceed one —hundred and fifty (150) in
r',-
1F007
length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and
shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and
shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of
the first story of any building An access road shall be provided
within fifty (50) feet of
_
all buildings is the natuLal grade between the
access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) where
(1)
ATTACHMENT F
the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or
systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department
IXI F8 A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150
11'008 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department
Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six-hundzed (600) feet except as
identified in the Development Code
-- -- -- - _ - -_ - - _
F9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to gLading
1Tr"9 and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval
Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having
Jurisdiction
I X I F10 All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow
1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project
shall be approved by the frLe agency having jurisdiction prior to the
installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made
serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has
been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire
protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be
in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be
over and above the average daily consumption of water The following
are minimum requirements for your proposed development
A System Standards
*Fire Flow 3500 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure
with sprinklered building
Duration 3 Hour/s
Hydrant Spacing 300 Feet between hydrants
*If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional
construction information is received
B Distribution System
Mains 6 inch minimum
Laterials 6 inch minimum
Riser 6 inch minimum
C Fire Hydrants_
Numbers 6 Total (public only)
Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s
with National Standard thread and
with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection
Street Valve 6 Inch Gate
X1 Fll The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal-
_F011
(2)
culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
"Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow "
F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection
3FO12 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 1231, "Water Supplies for
Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided
forea_c_h_parcelLthe minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined
by the- fire � _ = T_
F13 The developer or his engineer shall £uLnish the fire department
11� _ with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection
water systems are required The fire department shall also sign all
water plans prior to recordation
F14 Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino
3FO14 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced
F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req-
1F015 uiLements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan
must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction
prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenbelts
and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from
the fire department
Questions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning
Se >n, County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard-
in,- .alifornia, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225 Thank you for your coopera-
tion
Sincerely,
BY NANCY BEST
Fire Protection Planning Inspector
cc RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER
3517
FILE
Tt-�e following are IXJ Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications IXI Comments
r
NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS REFERENCE # SA 89-2
NAME TERRACE GATEWAY
LOCATION 12028 La Crosse
Ave , Grand Terrace, Ca
THE FOLLOWING NON-STA-NDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT
BASED UPON PLANS _SUBMITTED= TO__THI_S OFFICE __�_ PLEASF",��T1�'1�CT�S�3Ei_ - - -- - _ � —m>- _ ,_
-'�--IND-YC�ATED--rrRE��6TECT10N
PLA-N-NINGMOFFICE FOR--THEW,-P-PLICABLE
STANDARD
AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE
IXI F16
Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with
Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1
F17
Any gated access shall be approved by the Fire Department
and emergency access arrangements made prior to
occupancy
F18
Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack
of sufficient information to review Please submit
building plans and declaration of use for proper
application of codes
FJ9
The building occupancy is under the Durisdiction of the
State Fire Marshal Written documentation of review
and inspection required prior to final occupancy
Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441
IXI F20
All flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in
compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform
Fire Code Article 79 Plan review and permit to
operate are required
F21
All commercial Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage
and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform
Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #3054 Plan
review and permit to operate are required
IXI F22
All access roadways shall be in accordance with County
Ordinance #3055.
F23 Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous
Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards)
Compliance with the provisions of County Ordinance
#3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department
shall be required In those areas not so designated
under said ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan
Overlay Ordinance will apply
r24 An automatic fire alarm system is required Said
system shall be installed Lo the requirements of
Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2
IXI F25 Additional requirements shall be required as noted on
attachments
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NON-STANDARD REFERENCE # SA 89-2
CONDITIONS Fire Extinguishing Systems
LOCATION 12028 La Crosse Ave , ApN#
Grand Terrace, Ca NAME TERRACE GATEWAY
26 An automatic fire extinguishingsyystemis �euired__�_
for t h e
f o 1-1-o w— n g— a-r e a(-s-) - -- -
A
Commercial -type food heat -processing
�-'
equipment (UF(, Sec 10 314)
B
Spray paint booths or rooms
(UFC Sec 45.209)
C
High piled combustible storage
(UFC Sec 81 101)
IXI D
Occupancy and location
(UFC Sec 10 308)
E
Entire building due lack of access
(UFC Sec 10.207 fb) as amended by Cc
Ord #3055)
F
Entire building and/or complex as fire
flow mitigation measure
(UFC Sec 10 301fc) as amended by Co
Ord #3055)
G Other area as indicated
(UFC Sec 10 301(a) and 10 301(b) Spl haz)
H Entire Building or portions thereof as
applicable under State Fire Marshal's
Regulations
(Title 19, CAC)
All fire extinguishing systems, including automatic sprinkler
systems, Classes I, II and III combined standpipes, Halon systems
and other special automatic extinguishing systems and basement
pipe inlets shall be approved by both the Fire Department and the
Office of Building and Safety prior to installation Said systems
shall meet the appropriate standard whether NFPA or UBC The
Fire Department shall be notified of any testing approval and
shall witness said tests Systems shall be operational prior to
occupancy
1 Square footage of building
2 Take the square root
3 Multiply by 18
--- -= 4uT Multiply-`by+Construction Factor (:T
J
5 Mu I t i p J y by Occupancy Factor LL17 l
6 Distance to Exposures N S ( 2S') E ( ) w ( )
-73 0 LQ
Exposure Factor N (j 0 S (��� E ( ) w
Multiply by Total Exposure Factor
7 If sprinklered multiply Answer -Line 5 by 5
If not sprinklered, enter Line 5l
8 Add Line 6C—
If Total is less than 2,500 gpm round to nearest 250 gpm
If Total is more than 2)500 gpm round to nearest 500 gpm
Total Required Fire Flow
,
- , J
r` ,` .r -�. � `r ,.+� ' h �1?.���, �<l s;�?YHt��'rttT�h��r�I ,; �'�"-!1<<'r; � � � �����.r4;t�t(��"� �f _.1��� r ✓...
l
�iy
�° Q/Y'
°`
0ff, P
R�
450
hington Street • Colton, California 92324 • (714) 825-4128
a ,
January 30, 1989
Community Development Director ",
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
RE Terrace Gateway
12028 La Cross Avenue
APN #275-231-05/34/35/36
Dear David,
Riverside Highland Water Company can see no reason why
this project should not move forward Fhe project has no
water plans at this time
Gary Clark assured us that when he has approval from
the City he will move forward with them
RH skc
Sincerely,
a64
Rich Haubert
Distribution Superintendent
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO
ATTACHMENT G
rt MA I I ESON ,
4 Mayor
Ito r BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
}- R
_ F I,� B 13 10Mayor Pro Tem
E Couna7 Members
HUGHJ GRANT
DENNIS L EVANS
SUSAN CRAWFORD
THOMAS J SCHWAB
19 8 9 _`-�- _ City Manager `—
FILE NUMBER. SA-89-02
APPLICANT TERRACE GATEWAY (GARY CLARK)
LOCATION 12028 LA CROSSE AVENUE
(APN# 275-231-05/34/35/36)
PROJECT AN APPLICATION FOR A SERVICE COMMERCIAL CENTER
COMPRISED OF 3 MAJOR BUILDINGS PLUS A SITE FOR
A RESTAURANT AND A CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS
STATION.
Dear Reviewing Agency
The above referenced application is on file with the Grand Terrace
Planning Department Please submit any comments your agency- may
have regarding this application to the attention of David R
Sawyer, Community Development Director, 22795 Barton Road, Grand
Terrace, California, 92324 We apologize for the late notification
of this pro3ect but would appreciate replies to this office no
later than 'FEBRUARY"S; 1§89 (WEDNESDAY)
UTILITY COMPANIES No input is necessary unless you have existing
rights of ways or easements
YOUR RESPONSES CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT IF YOU DO
NOT MEET THE DEADLINE.
tsince ely,
r
David R Sawyer
Community Development Director 1
)9E�S-
1Z U7�
ATTACHMENT
v � �
f
H
ccaditions for Approval
Page Two
6. Verification of application for sign registration
and plot plan approval by DEHS must be submitted
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
of any freestanding sign or portion thereof which
has an area of eighteen (18) square feet or greater
and/or which has a height of six (6) feet or greater
conditions for approval prior to occupancy
L__ 1 Plans for food establishments shall be reviewed and
approved by DEHS For information call DENS/Plan
Check
2 Plans for swimming pool(s) and restroom facilities
shall be reviewed and approved by DEHS For
information call DEHS/Plan Check at
Plans for underground tanks shall be reviewed and
approved by DEHS For information call
DEHS/Hazardous Materials Field Services at 714/387-
3080
Prior to occupancy, a "Business Plan" as defined in
Chapter 6 95 of the Health and Safety Code, detailing
the plan for emergency release or threatened
release of hazardous materials and wastes, may/shall
be required Obtain clearance from DEHS/Hazardous
Materials Section For information, call Emergency
Response/Enforcement at 714/387-3044
A Hazardous Materials Handler Permit and/or Hazardous
Waste Generator Permit may/shall be required For
information, call Hazardous Materials Field Services
at 71,4/387-3080
6 Prior to the installation of any permanent on -site
and/or off -site sign associated with site approval,
an application for sign registration must be
submitted to DEHS
f
COLTON_JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL C
1212 Valencia Flue, Colton, California 92324 1798 (714)876-4227
__.—--.B-QAR D--0I=__ E D-UCAT l� 2� _ _w _ k e b z u 4-1a , , = ? 9 8-9
MR ARLIE R HUBBARD City of Grand Terrace U 01
President 22795 Barton Rd
MRS DORTHAE COOLEY Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Vice President r
MR RAY ABRIL JR Attention Mr David R Sawyer
Clerk Community Development Director
MRS WENDYS CURRAN Re SA-89-2
MRS RUFH0 HARRIS The Colton Joint Unified School District (CJUSD) is impacted
MRS PATRICIAI NIX by student generation resulting from commercial and industrial
MRS PHYLLISV ZIMMERMAN development occurring within the boundaries of CJUSD at the
present time As a result, CJUSD levies, pursuant to
California Government Code sections 53080 and 65995,
a school facilities fee of $ 25 per square,fti of covered
and enclosed space on new commercial and industrial
ADMINISTRATION development
MR RUSSELLI DICKINSON
The above referenced project(SA-89-2) concerns the district
Superintendent
as to its impact on Grand Terrace Elementary School The
MR CHARLESH JORDAN
addition of 92,000 square f t of commercial development
Assistant Superintendent Personnel
will have a significant adverse impact on traffic in the
MR ROBERTW MURPHY
vicinity of Barton Rd and the school site The addition of
Assistant Superintendent Business
more than 370 parking spaces to meet city requirements for
MISS NANCYA NORTON
such a project is an indication of the volume of traffic to
Assistant Superintendent
Curnculumand Instruction
be expected from this development alone, independent of the
the cumulative effect of additional development in the city
MR DANNY CARRASCO
Director Administrative Services
The traffic impact and resultingand noise pollution generated
MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT
Director Pupil Personnel Services
from the substantial increase in traffic will need to be mitigated
in order to protect the health and safety of the children
attending Grand Terrace Elementary School The assessment of
school facility fees does not provide sufficient revenue to
finance the needed mitigation measures, particularly since the
District is in the "state match" period CJUSD has been
in the state match since Oct 14, 1987 which means all school
fees collected by the district are to be contributed towards
the local share of building new schools The district has
no other source of Capital facilities Funds
As you know, Lhe district has previously expressed its concerns
on this matter to the City In a spirit of cooperation on a
matter as important as Lhe health and safety of the student
population, we have requested the City to complete a study to
determine what sound attenuation measures can be implemented to
reduce this impacL Lo an acceptable level District
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
representatives have also testified before the City Planning
Commission _and City _Council on _several occasions
CJUSD and the City have a responsibility to protect the
health and safety of the community's school children
Again, we request the City to develop acceptable mitigation
measures so that development can continue without further
adverse impact or interruption It is the hope of the District
that these issues can be resolved an an amicable manner
Sincerely,
U
Kent Van Gelder
Coordinator of School Facilities
cc Parker and Covert
Attorneys at Law
DATE Sept 7, 1989
S T A FF R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING jDLATE
SUBJECT PURCHASE BACK ACCRUED VACATION TIME
FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FUNDING REQUIRED XX
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
_ _Se p�t __14,_ 19_8_9
The City of Grand Terrace currently does not pay overtime for any
employee's attendance at required Council or Committee Meetings
Additionally, compensatory time is given to management for work
after hours and for supervision of the County Work Release
Program Crews Overtime is paid to our maintenance crew when
working after hours
The Assistant City Manager, Randy Anstine, attends most Council
Meetings, various committee assignments and eight hours per week
on a Saturday or Sunday for supervision of the Work Release
Program The Assistant City Manager is also the individual
called out for all of our public works' emergencies on nights and
weekends Even though the City has a maximum accrual of forty
hours of compensatory time, the Assistant City Manager has been
able to cover most of his leave and vacation time with the
balance in his compensatory time account The continual use of
compensatory time in lieu of vacation has resulted in an accrual
by the Assistant City Manager of 16 5 weeks of vacation The
City Personnel Policy states that the maximum accrual for an
employee is twice his annual vacation In the case of Mr
Anstine this would be six weeks maximum accrual of an employee
over five years I have encouraged the Assistant City Manager to
make use of his vacation time to bring it within the appropriate
accrual amount, but the continual addition of compensatory time
has made this impossible to reduce
Staff is proposing that the City purchase back some of the
Assistant City Manager's accrued vacation and allow him to
utilize his accrued vacation through the current calendar year,
at which time the maximum accrual will be strictly enforced and
it will become a use it or lose it proposition in the future
rj tij r'�( h
t' . to .P #_3
STAFF REPORT -- PURCHASE BACK VACATION TIME
Sept 14, 1989
Page Two
The current weekly salary for the Assistant City Manager is $931
per week_ This has been accruing over the past --five yea-r-s - a-t--- - --
^various-- rates J of compensation because of promotions, but the
average rate in the pest five years is $766 38 per week In
order for the City to bring the Assistant City Manager's vacation
accrual within the limit of the Personnel Rules, the City would
have to purchase 10 5 weeks of vacation As a compromise, staff
recommends the purchase of seven weeks of vacation time and work
out vacation leave prior to the end of the year to bring the
accrual within the two-year limit In any case, after January 1,
1990, the two-year maximum will be strictly enforced To
purchase seven weeks at this average rate would require an
additional appropriation of $5,364 66
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT
COUNCIL APPROPRIATE $5364 66 AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURCHASE
SEVEN WEEKS OF VACATION TIME FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
TS bt
August 14, 1989
Grand Terrace Parks & Recreation Committee
22795 Barton Rd
-- Gran-6Terrace; C-A-9-2_YY--24_ --_ _ __ - -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- --- -
Dear Parks & Recreation Committee,
Please accept my resignation from the Parks & Recreation Committee At
the present time my interest lie in a more active participation with the
youth of today
Good luck In 1989/901
SOncerely,
Barbara N Conley
�- 22285 Dove St
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
CiAl1tC!G ii' -'ItiA .Tr,,S 5; 5-i4 (/)(CO
CITY CF GRAND TERRI=
_ _._.-P-a r 1 - d -Rvr t -i e .- m t om e
Monday, August 7,^1989�
MINUTES
MEMBERS PRESENT Dick, Weeks, Chairman, Marcia Johansen, Secretary,
___Lenny_Fro_st, Mike Breckenridge - - -- - -- --- - ---�- -___ ___
CITY STAFF Randy Anstine
TESTS Tony Petta, Cathy Leogrande
The meeting was called to order at 7 40 p m followed by the pledge of
allegence and introductions
June minutes corrected to read scholarship award was $500, approved as
corrected
Trails development was discussed It appears that some Southern Cali-
fornia Edison easements are on private land under the electric lines so
that area does not appear appropriate for development of a trail to Agua
Mansa
A thank you letter was received from the Riverside Community College
Foundationfor the$500 grant awarded to Monica Taylor
'AFF REPORT Randy reportedthat Karen is working on a brochure for
Tour de Terrace
The City Manager is interested in constructing a Day Care facility
The FY1988/89 budget and FY 1989/90 were discussed
Chairman, Dick Weeks recommended acceptance of the application of
Cathy Leogrande to the Park and Recreation Committee Lenny Frost
so moved Seconded by Mike Breckenridge
Development of FY 1989/90 Committee Goals and Objectives was discussed
1 To facilitate a Park and Recreation Plan
2 To determine Park and Recreation needs of the community
3 To perform safety inspections of Park and Recreation facilities and
to evaluate satisfaction of current program participants
4 To enhance committee member knowledge of Park and Recreation profes-
sionally and locally Tour two times per year
Lennie Frost discussed the removal of pea gravel from park play area
Meeting was adjourned at 8 40 p m
Respectfully submitted,
Marcia L J ansen
I
BYRON R MATTESON
Mayor
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
Mavor Pro Tem
Council Members
HUGHJ GRANT
DENNIS L EVANS
SUSAN CRAWFORD
THOMASJ SCHWAB
City Manager
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE
Minutes of the August 7, 1989 Meeting
The meeting was called to order at 7 06 PM by Chairman Viola
Gratson. Those present were Viola, Hannah Laister, Ann Petta,
Irene Mason and Pauline Grant. Randy Anstine was also present.
Marie Schmidt was absent.
The minutes of the July 3rd meeting were read and approved. Motion
was made to accept by Hannah, seconded by Pauline. Treasurer's
report the same.
Randy reported that the showcase for the sister -city plates would
not be upstairs but somewhere in the back so as to be behind locked
doors. Viola received a letter from the San Bernardino County
Information Foundation who's major concern is traffic. Since this
is not in our sphere, Randy will give the letter to the Planning
Department. We also received a letter from Cal State stating that
they have speakers for any topic.
Viola had a call from the Redlands Art Show wanting to rent two of
our screens. These are very fragile and easily damaged. Randy
said there is a City policy about lending equipment.
Flyers are ready and will be in the September sewer billings. 11ex�
month we will work on the posters. Louise Smith in Finance will be
asked to imprint Country Fair on the sewer bills. Irene will have
an item in the September Chamber Newsletter.
The next meeting will September 5th due to the Labor Day holiday.
The meeting was adjourned at 7.45 PM. Motion was made by Ann,
seconded by Irene.
Respectfully submitted,
Hannah Laister
Secretary
22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 \
MONDAY, JUNE 12, 1989
The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee convened at it'e
regular monthly meeting in the Conference Room at the Civic Center
_ _ -at 19-Qo_hours. _
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ed O'Neal, Chairman, Ron Wright, Treasurer,
Dick Rollins, Recording Secty, Debra Dueller
Urs Aeberle, Bea Gigandet
MEMBERS ABSENT: Harold Lord
CITY STAFF: Sharon Korgan, Sheriff's Dept. Community Affairs
GUESTS PRRSENT: Linda Heney, President P.T.A. Grand Terrace
Jim Singley, City Council
The Minutes of the meeting of May 10, 1989 were distributed to the
members present to be read. After the minutes were read the Chairman
entertained a motion that the minutes be accepted as written. Debbie
Meuller made the motion with Urs Aeberle making the second, the motion
carried unanimously.
#1
Urs Aeberle presented the full budget report that he had obtained
from the City Manager on breakdowns
on Departmental Expenses re-
garding the Crime Prevention Committee. He reported that there
was $178.27 balance
remaining listed under Office Expanse, he
further stated that a line item of $2,000.00
not previously
expended was to be carried over into the 89190 fiscal year budget.
#2
Debra Meuller reported that about a dozen youngsters and parents
attended a Neighborhood Watch
and Earthquake Preparedness class
especially programmed for youngsters and their parents. She also
conducts classes in latch Key Children, and Block Parenting.
#3
Sharon Korgan�again reported on the importance of programs to be
scheduled on Drug Abuse, Rape Prevention, Child
Abuse and Personal
safety that this Committee needs to address for the balance of this
year. Shealsospoke of an Arson Program and film and the Dept.
Of Justice's
program on Child Fingerprinting and it's importance
within the Missing Children national
program. Sharon has emphasised
the importance of the Crime Prevention Committee's participation
and planning these programs rather than placing all of the respons-
ibility on just her and a couple
of others.
#4
Chairman O'Neal stated that he felt that a Neighborhood News Letter
might be offered from this committee
alone regarding all of the thin
Pertinent to Crime Prevention. Discussion of the Safety Fair
and it
COUNCIL JT MSA(3)(a)
I-1MIlF11_y >_Ikw111I'
1_ 1 I Ili 11I 0101-11111 1 EI h 1 II,k
HIM115 I IF 1'I' 10, l a,_; 1
fk11_ Mae f 11I 1 wit ,w 1 I I'd 1 n 01 do I I,'a j bw C1-Ia1I NIn L-I_I L "to = it
- MW _ f FEy. NC Till FIIFIIlI1f' ^ I_2 1rF_II- . A'Art, I _ E a_
1,111k hil _i 1 1I
I� (11I III11 t I_,j I!r 111 h 1 L Li I_'_l I'I1_i I J I1� a
I i111III-I. i) 1 i _i`III I if III I I_] i*'I I`IUr_tr I11_1111in H_tl I I_I _T If, II i 1 a-r F
CON I F �1_'_ � � 1 1 J v 1 In I _1l I I rr � I. , � I,Ica t, � ,1 hI I. 1 I=k IQ D. t l i 4 I 7 1 l I l h- 1^
k-d I�r" I� i E+11 16 �1I I -I Ilfrl1l}rI�'I, III1 1Ii" ��,1 a r f,_, I.II
kill,
%ij tlt,(,I I i 1 t d tI Ir_ II I_1i11`,3 1-4 I rII� Lind Ir_ I ri1 311` Jill-] 111 I L
IrIEF t 11I_! 1fl
I- lit 111UH,fI 1'i11 11_111: FII L ' F I I_ 1,pm A 111-1 ,-
�. 1� '- i_ i I I I t I f - _F j ! ,; l r ' 1 1= j I 7—
\l l t_ i_ Wl L 11. IT J C ITI V _I I - I I I 4 L 7 D Y 1 n" 1 I,_, r We W Y 1 1 d I -
1111=kII_rJ I -I-IJQ 1 V muf C I to - "1 ! ? III..'1 a to, Ir I" _
f IEW 1 I I It _ -, Id I-- I I L I 1 _ ," I I I (' rl I ,r,I,Ii l I 31" i f I,:_ _ -1 f I_ i I 1 T. a f 1 ,` TO I P
L t_Illlf I' I'' - ,r ( I Ij f I I I I I r! 1 1 II_ 1++i I I 11 ill! I+ I- , 1-:4 1 I 11 1 11, J R, I 1 y"
11r1r 1 II11"II r 11 f_,1 1 IIr d I L II; II('I'1_II 1 aI11J I1I_1J1, 11 I,'1I III i k17_ ,_,_,11,(rI_iTF
FI Ir- noi Plt f_ i Ill I 1.11 11 L I. TI 1 n, , 1 .I . 1 _I, ' ) a )_ U, 11 ru .
VI to INII- t_I' 111a 1 1 g 1,j If111h II,-j a 11'I 1 III
1, r, lay I
RECEIVED
AUG 1 8 1989
CITY CLERK'S DEPT,
ONNI FO AG = m1A a S13 NO-)
S T A F F R E P O R T
DATE' 8-30-89
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE. 9-14-89
AGENDA ITEM -NO.__ --
SUBJECT. SP-89-1, an application for a specific plan consisting
of 23 two -bedroom apartment units in the R-3 District I�
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
APPLICANT: Tom Wall
ADDRESS: 22085 Newport Avenue
ZONING AND LAND USES:
PROPERTY LOCATION
GP
ZONING LAND USE
Sub3ect Property
MDR
R-3
Abandoned Church
To the West
MDR
R-3
Mobile Home Park
To the East
-
-
215 Freeway
To the North
I
M-2
So Cal Edison
Power Plant
To the South
MDR
R-3
Vacant
Existing Land Use
The site is primarily vacant
except
for an
abandoned structure
previously used as a church.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and is
attached as Attachment A's Exhibit F
MINKIL AGC-1kDA d f Lt\A 0 w A
DISCUSSION:
The applicant, Tom Wall/Newport Terrace Apartments, proposes to
construct a 23 unit apartment complex on 84,883 square feet of land
in the R-3 (Multi -Family Residential) Zone. The complex would
consist entirely of 2 bedroom units each with 1,018 square feet and
attached two car garages.
-- -==Since -the project proposes twenty or more `units ( 2 3 ) a specific
plan is required The attached specific plan (Attachment A's
Exhibit A) looks at site development issues such as environmental
constraints and public facilities availability. It also looks at
the project's relationship to the General Plan and its design
issues.
SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:
The proposed project meets all of the City's code requirements for
an R3 zoned project.
The project's architectural design features a two-story townhouse
design with yellow ship lap siding and white trim and facia boards,
along with gray "shake styled" roof tiles (a materials board will
be presented at the meeting) The structure makes use of varied
roof elevations and pitches along with some protruding windows to
provide the buildings with an appealing architectural relief.
The interior of the units are well laid out and functional. Each
unit has access through the kitchen to the attached two car garage
and is equipped with two and a half baths, a private patio
accessible from the living room, a private deck accessible from the
master bedroom, individual heating, air conditioning and water
heater facilities, dishwashers, disposals, built-in ranges,
carpeting, window coverings and laundry hook-ups.
Recreational facilities include open grassed areas, picnic tables,
barbecues and a tot lot with play and gym equipment
REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS:
The following reviewing agencies made comments on this project
ENGINEERINGZBUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT
The Engineering Department's recommendations of approval are
included in their Memorandum dated June 15, 1989 (Attachment A's
Exhibit B).
FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT
The Fire Department's comments are included in their Memorandum
dated May 9, 1989 (Attachment A's Exhibit C)
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
The Department of Environmental Health Services indicated that the
outdoor noise level (measured at the eastern property line) should
be mitigated to below 65 dBA and that the indoor level (habitable
areas) should be mitigated to below 45 dBA
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO.
The water district_ stated _that they do- not have any__ concerns._ _
regarding this project and will be able to serve them --
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
No comments were received from So Calif Edison
COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
The School District's comments are included in their letter dated
June 13, 1989 (Attachment A's Exhibit D)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
No comments were received from the Department of Transportation at
the time of the Planning Commission's hearing However,
subsequently, they have responded and their comments are included
as Attachment A's Exhibit E.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the City Council approve the
attached resolution approving SP-89-1 subject to the following
conditions and contained therein
Conditions of Approval
1. The applicant shall meet all of the requirements
recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum
dated June 15, 1989 attached as Attachment A's
Exhibit B
2. The applicant shall meet all of the requirements
recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden
Department in their memorandum dated May 9, 1989
attached as Attachment A's Exhibit C.
3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate school fee
as identified in the Colton Unified School
District's letter dated June 13, 1989 attached as
Attachment A's Exhibit D
4 Mitigation measures shall be required sufficient to
reduce the outdoor noise level (measured at the eastern
property line) to below 65 dBA and the indoor level
(habitable areas) to below 45 dBA Said mitigation
measures may include additional insulation and other
construction techniques to reduce the dBA level and may
also include the construction of a sound attenuation wall
along the eastern property line.
5. The applicant shall satisfactorily address the
concerns of the Department of Transportation as
identified in their memo dated July 13, 1989 and
attached as Exhibit E
6. A six foot high _ decorative block wall___ shall_ _be__—__
constructed along the eastern and southern property
lines The existing block wall on the western property
line may be utilized for this pro3ect, if however, said
wall should ever be removed by this or the ad3acent
property owner a replacement wall, six (6) feet in height
shall be constructed The materials for construction of
the required block walls shall be approved by the
Planning Director prior to construction
7 Cable television shall be provided to each unit
8 All heating and air conditioning equipment shall be
ground mounted and screened from view or located
within the structure
9. The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting
and irrigation plans to be approved by the Community
Development Director Said lighting shall be in
accordance with the proposed off-street parking
ordinance
11. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee into the
Canal Street/Barton Road Signal Light Fund in an amount
equal to the rate paid by properties previously assessed
12. The fencing materials to be used for the individual patio
areas shall not exceed 36" in height and shall be
identified on the required landscaping and lighting plan
Respect ly submitted
David Sawyer
Community DevelopLt Director
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING SP-89-1 AND
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR SAID PROJECT
__ WHEREAS, the Applfcant,-Tom Wall\Newporl'ferrace Apartments; has appTsed-for` ---
approval of SP-89-1 (Exhibit A), at 22085 Newport Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the adoption of SP-89-1 incorporates all the issues addressed in
conditional use pernut and site and architectural reviews, and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project inaccordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act, and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on June 19, 1989 regarding this application, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of SP-89-1 subject to
certain conditions, and
WHEREAS, said conditions recommended by the Planning Commission have either
been incorporated into the project or are included in the conditions of approval listed in
this resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace, California, that
1 The Negative Declaration for SP-89-1 (Exhibit F) is hereby recommended
for approval, and
2 SP-89-1 is hereby found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Grand Terrace
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that SP-89-1 is hereby approved subject to the
following conditions
1 The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by
the City Engineer in his memorandum dated June 15, 1989 attached
as Attachment A's Exhibit B
2 The applicant shall meet all of the requirements recommended by
the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandum
dated May 9, 1989 attached as Attachment Xs Exhibit C
ATTACHMENT A
3 The applicant shall pay the appropriate school fee as identified in
the Colton Unified School District's letter dated June 13, 1989
attached as Attachment A's Exhibit D
4 Mitigation measures shall be required sufficent to reduce the outdoor noise
level (measured at the eastern property line) to below 65 dBA and the
indoor level (habitable areas) to below 45 dBA Said mitigation measures
- - - -- - may include -additional— insulation and other construction tdchnique 16"-
reduce the dBA level and may also include the construction of a sound
attenuation wall along the eastern property line
5 A six foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed along the eastern
and southern property lines The existing block wall on the western
property line may be utilized for this project, if however, said wall should
ever be removed by this or the adjacent property owner a replacement wall,
six (6) feet in height shall be constructed The materials for construction
of the required block walls shall be approved by the Planning Director prior
to construction
6 The applicant shall satisfactorily address the concerns of the Department of
Transportation as identified in their memo dated July 13, 1989 and attached
as Exhibit E
7 Cable television shall be provided to each unit
8 All heating and air conditioning equipment shall be ground mounted and
screened from view or located within the structure Said equipment shall
be identified on the required landscaping and lighting plan
9 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping, lighting and irrigation plans
to be approved by the Community Development Director Said lighting
shall be in accordance with the proposed off-street parking ordinance
11 The applicant shall be required to pay a fee into the Canal Street/Barton
Road Signal Light Fund in an amount equal to the rate paid by properties
previously assessed
12 The fencing materials to be used for the individual patio areas shall not
exceed 36" in height and shall be identified on the required landscaping and
lighting plan
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California at a regular meeting held the 14th day of September, 1989 by the following
vote
Ayes
Noes
Absent
Abstain
Byron Matteson, Mayor
ATTEST
City Clerk,
City of Grand Terrace
Approved as to Form
John Harper, City Attorney
r
22795 Barton Road
errand Terrace
ilift 92324-5295
Civic. Center
(714) 824-6621
Il\ ion R Mattcson
M 1tioi
Hugh J Grant
A4 i�or Pio rempoie
jW Dfennighautien
Jim Singley
Gen(, Carlst►om
Council Mcmbcrti
T homas T Schwah
CRY M,111dgLr
JUN 15 1989
W 0 12-8 5121
TO David Sawyer, Directoi Community Development
FROM Joseph Kicalc, City Engineer
DAIL June 15, 1989
SUBJECT SP 89-1
Following recommendaLions should be considered as conditions of
approval for subject proposal
1 Construct curb and guLLei 18 feet- from street -
centerline
2 Construct standard roadway between new curb and street
centerline
3 Tnstal1 standard sidewalk
4 Install ornamental stieeL lights
5 Provide adequate drainage facilities
6 Pay all capital improvement fund fees in accordance
with current ordinances
7 Submit detail grading plan
8 Physically locate all lot corners and/or establish the
same
9 File a "Record of Survey" or one lot subdivision, as
may be required
10 Paicel, as it now exists slopes away from Newport -
Avenue, where public sanitary sewer service exists The
developer shall submit detail plan for collecting sewage on
site and disposal of same to public sanitary sewer The
plan shall include details of any proposed pumping
faciliites including plans and specifications
EXHIBIT B
11 Maintenance of pumping facilities installed shall be
the responsibility of the property owner
12 All i.rnprovements shall be designed by owner's englneei,
properly licenced in the field of practice, to the
-- - - ---- --- - specifi.caLions -of—the City-
I
FOFESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor • San Bernardino CA 92415 0186 5fft )
(- 114) 12 387 4213 — I �� L YD TIDWELL Director
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Lim
TO CCAMY OF SAN BERNARDINO FItONJ COUNTY OF SAN Its
Forestry & lire Warden r% r V I( -Of Tice of Bldg & Safety
385 N Arrowhead Ave r� N Ai rcwhead Ave ~`% -
--- -- Barr Bernardino, CA 924-15-0�1 UIV J 198� San Bernx�Cino,—���IS=(�1Bi _ - ��
�s z�
The Clty of Grand 'Terrace (Phone 824-6b21 ) Office
/<-
(B & S Regional Office)
Bui.Laing & Safety lids received plans for checking on the following pro3ec.t
BUILDING USE Apts 03NSTRUCI'1ON TYPE VN OCC TYPE R-1
DWARG FOOTAGE PER STORY NUMBER OF SIC)RIES 1 _
70B Lf_f_AT1U4 (ADDRESS) 22U85 Newport Avenue
-OMMUNITY Grand Terrace CROSS STRLE;1'
UCH1=/ENGINLLR A E smi th PHCNL
�LUDRI:SS 8632 Archibald Ave , SLe 201 Rancho Cucanr-)nga, Ca 91730
xfNrR. Torn Wall I I _ PHONE
�DDRLSS E-1 v' L GQ
X1 PLOT PLAN* APN 275-211--44 1 1 BUILDING PERMIT
I 4N CHECK NO
PLAITING Pl,�_7ECT NO
'LOT PLAN MUST BE, SUBMITTED WITH THIS FORM FOR CALCULATING FIRE FLOW
:E: 1 R) 2 NTS
Y Nancy Best
DATE 5/9/89
Tr----.------------------------------�------------- ---------------
THIS SELTION TO BE CCX JPLETED BY THE CaNrY FIRE WARDEN------_-
EFLRRhD TO C F W
RANSMITTAL NO
ATE; 5/9/89
EMI VED BY
ATE
89-162
SAN BLRNARDINU COUNTY FIRE WARDEN
BY NALqCy R F__'S`P
THIS SECT1CAq TO BE COtPLhTED By REFLRRAL AUTWR1Ty
TIME
FIRE AUI'HOR1r11Y
)R INFORMATION R0X,ARDING THIS PROJECT,
JGIONAL OFFICE
SIGNATURE
M4TAC,T ABOVE BUILDING & SAFE= D
,IRG AU1'd ONLY -If Plot Plan only, do not submit to Building & Safety as M1� cn
ley will not have files on Yro3ect Please send your conditions to Omer
x1 Engineer
3P-10 RVSD 01/89 AO �J
EXHIBIT C
r --
FORESTRY AND FIRE %VARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD
Fire �'rotectlon Planning Services • County Government Center IT`O
385 No Arrowhead Avenue First Floor San Bernardino CA 92415 0186 OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
(714) 3R7 4 .12- 387 42.13 FLOYD TIDWELL, D1ror_tr
r � �► ► ao a r,
EMERGENCY SERVICES
MAY 9, 1989
-- --- C11'Y_O_F G_PAND TE ZPACE Tr-ans-nuttaL No
PLANNING DEPA IMENP Plan Check Check No _
AVrN =
APN-
1 DAVID J DR1SC'OLL, Oilef--
County Fire Warden -
2�T F 1 RE PRUITC'1' 10N R1.,W 1 RU=S -
Q2 ECKU_D PDXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PRC>`7ECT
Fl The above referericed proDect is protected by the Forestry
11 & Fiie Warden Dept Prior to construction occuLring on any parcel the -
owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire
protection development requirements - - -
F2 All new construction shall cOnply with applicable sections of the _
2 1985 Uniform Fire erode kCity Ordinance No 106), Development Code, --- -
Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations - ----
larding fires arri fire prevention adopted by the State of Californid
F3 The street address shall be posted with a mininun of three (.3) ---` - - '
3 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance witn San Bernardino --
County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy Posted numbers shall _IIC
contrdst with their backyround and be visible and legible from the street '--_
r4 f' Mach clumney used in ccn3unction with any fireplace or any - C
4 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be mint--_-
ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire - - -
Ccxle
F5 All flammable veyetation shall be removed from each building _-
i site a minimum distance of thirty k30) feet from any flammable buildiny
material, including a finished structure --
F6 The development ana each phase thereof shall have two points
> of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for '
routes of escape which will safely handle evacuaticns as required in the -
Iievelopment Code -
F7 Private roadways which e>ceed one -hundred am fifty (150) in -
length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and -
shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and -
shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of
the first story of any building An access road shall be provided
(1)
_ - I
within fifty (50j teet of all buildings is the natural grade between the
access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) Where
the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or
systems shall be provided as required and approvea by the fire department
X1 F8 A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150
PU08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department
-- -Cul-de-sac lengthi shall not exceed -six-hundred—(600j- feet except, -as
identified in the Development Code
I�_ F9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading
M09 ana snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval
Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having
3uLisdiction
XI F10 All file protection systems designed to greet the fire flow
P010 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project
shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the
installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made
serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has
been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire
protection, as required by the fire agency having Jurisdiction, shall be
in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be
over and above the average daily consumption of water The follows ng
are minimum requirements for your proposed development SEE ATTACHED
A System Standards
*Fire Flow 1750 ,GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure
Duration 2 Hour/s
Hydrant Spacing J00 Feet between hydrants
*If blank, flow to be determined by calcuiation when additional
construction information is received
B Distribution System
Mains 6 inch minimum
Laterials 6 inch minimum
Pisei 6 inch minimum
C Fire Hydrants
Numbers 2 Total
Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s
with National Standard thread and
with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection
Street Valve 6 lnch Gate
k2)
I
=eE�u__ed appropriate ca -
F011 culdtions, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
"Guiae for the Determination of Required Fire Flow "
F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection
ro12 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 1131, "Water Supplies for
Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided
for each parcel, the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be cietermined
- by -the fire-depar-t-unent
KI F13 The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department
EF01 with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection
water systems are required In addition, a letter from the water
purveyor stating what fire flog can be net shall be required The fire
department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation
F14 Nbuntain Fire Zone tuilding regulations specified in San Bernardino
F014 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced
F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req-
U15 uiiements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan
must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction
prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenx)elts
and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from
the fiie department
zestions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning
�ct� , County Government Center, 385 North Arrowheaa, lst Floor, San Bernard-
o, c_alifornia, 92a15-U186, or call 714-,jS7-4125 Thank you for your ccopera-
on
ncerely,
NANCY BEST
Fire Protection Planning Inspector
A E Smi. th
Riverside Highland Water
3517
file
e following are IXI Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments
Purning radius at cul-de-sac bulb shall be increased to 40 ft radius, "Ic
RKING-KRE LANE" signs shall be posted in the bulb area and along the drive
Submit information on "GRASz>CRL=" Cul-de-sac mast be all-weather surfaced,
1e to support fire apparatus (95% compaction)
N
NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS REFERENCE x R9-I(;"l
NAME A E SMITH LOCATION GRAND TERRACE
THE FOLLOWING NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT
BASED UPON PLANS SUBMITTED TO `1'H1S OFFICE PLEASE CONTACT THE
- - --- INDICATED FIRE- RROTE-CTI )V--RLA-t4-N-1-NG-OFEI-Cr='-91fi `TliE_-APPLICABLE -� -
STANDARD AND PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE
IXI Flb Fiie extinguishers are required in accordance with
Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1
�XF17 Any gated access shall be approved by the 1: iie Department
and emergency access arrangements made prior to
occupancy
F18 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack
of sufficient information to review Please submit
building plans and declaration of use for proper
application of codes
I F19 The building occupancy is under the 3urisdiction of the
State Fire Marshal Written documentation of review
and inspection required prior to final occupancy
Contact the West Covina Office at 818-960-6441
I F20 All flammable liquid storage and dispensing shall be in
compliance with the applicable sections of the Uniform
Fire Code Article 79 Plan review and permit to
operate are required
F21 All commercial Liquitied Petroleum Gas (LPG) storage
and dispensing shall be in compliance with the Uniform
Fire Code Article 82 and County Ordinance #j054 Plan
review and permit to operate are required
IXI F22 Ail access roadways shall be in accordance with County
Ordinance #J055
F23 Development is within the Safety Foothills Hazardous
Protective Overlay Area (Greenbelt Standards)
Complidnce with the provisions of County Ordinance
#3108 as applicable and determined by the Fire Department
shall be required In those areas not so designated
under saia ordinance, the appropriate Community Plan
Overlay Ordinance will apply
F24 An automatic fire alarm system is required Said
system shall be installed to the requirements of
Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-2
F25 Additional requirements shall be,
required as noted on
attachments
COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
1212 vatencia UMV70, Uolton, Galifornia 92324-1798 (714)876-4227
r
BOARD OF EDUCATION
June 13, 1989 -
MRS DORTHA C COOLEY
President t
MRS WENDY S CURRAN
Vice President
MR RAY ABRIL JR
Clerk Mr David R Sawyer
MRS RUTHO HARRIS Community Development Director
MR ARLIER HUBBARD City of Grand Terrace
MRS PATRICIA I NIX ��795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
MR5 PHYLLIS V 71MMERMAN
Subject S.P.-89-1
ADMINISTRATION Dear Mr Sawyer
MR RUSSELL I DICKINSON
Superintendent The Colton Joint Unified District is impacted at the present
MR CHARLESH JORDAN time As a result the school district assesses a fee of $1 56
Assistant Superintendent per square foot on covered and enclosed residential souare
Personnel footage
MR ROBCRT W MURPHY
Assistant Superintendent The fees are payable prior to the issuance of building permits
Business p y
While the District remiains concerned as to the affect of
MISSNANCYA NORTON additional residential development on Grand Terrace Elementary
Assistant Superintendent p 1'y
Curriculum and Instruction School, the District has no objection to the project if the
MR DANNYCARRASCO required assessment is met
Director Administrative Services
MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Sincerely,
Director Pupil Personnel Services A-1-9—rrx
Greg G Gage
Coordinator, School Facilities
GGG/lc
Joining Together to Go the Extra Mile — EXHIBIT D
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor
DEPARTMENT_OF TR N5PORTAII
DISTRICT 8 P O BOX 231
SAN BERNARDINO CA 92402
TDD (714) 3834609
July 13, 1989
Planning Department
City of Grand Terrace
Attention David R Sawyer
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Mr Sawyer.
l
RECT J U L 17 19$c,
Development Review
08-SBd-215-1.78
Your Reference:
- - - - = - -- SF-89=1/Newport
Terrace Apts.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed specific
plan for the Newport Terrace Apartment complex located west of
Interstate 215 and southerly of Newport Avenue in Grand Terrace
Growth within the city has created traffic impacts and should be
mitigated by the developments which influence these conditions.
Caltrans is planning a widening pro3ect for Interstate 215 in the
future which this development may be impacted by an increase in
noise levels Noise levels ad]acent to freeways are of
considerable concern and this developemnt should be required to
construct noise attenuation measures such as sound walls as
mitigation for development
Existing drainage patterns should be perpetuated and any measures
necessary to reduce increased drainage impacts should be included
with this development
If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way,
the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr Kamel
Alexander at (714) 383-4671
Very truly yours,
H N. LEWANDOWSKI
District Permits Engineer
EXHIBIT E
Planning
Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative
Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced pro]ect, on
the basis that said pro3ect will not have a significant effect on
the environment
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
SP-89-1, is a proposal to construct a 23 three (3) bedroom
apartment complex on 84,883 square feet of land This property is
located in the City's R-3, Multi -Family Residential Zone. The
General Plan's land use designation is Medium Density Residential
(see attached map)
APPLICANT:
Tom Wall/Newport Terrace Apartments
LOCATION:
22085 Newport Avenue (APN # 275-211-44)
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial
evidence that once the required mitigation measures are in place
that the pro3ect will have a significant effect on the environment.
David Sawyer,
Community Developireent Director
City of Grand Terrace
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REDUCED TO ALL TWO
BEDROOM APARTMENT UNITS 8-30-89
Date
EXHIBIT F
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
--Background
1 Name of Proponent City of Grand Terrace
2 Address and Phone Number of Proponent City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attention David Sawyer, Planning Director
3 Date of Environmental Assessment _ - ICY9
4 Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace
5 Name of Proposal, if applicable�r--`Te�4r��r�mP,�
6 Location of Proposal �.����_�A-p����.✓e��r
e-I-r- P l7
II Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets )
1 Earth Will the proposal result in
a Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
c Substantial change in topography or
ground surface relief features?
d The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
Yes Maybe No
IN
4
E
FAI
Yes
be Z1 o
f
Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or
the bed of the ocean or any bay,
inlet or lak-e7
—
--------- ---- g
--Exposure of people -or property
-----
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
-
failure, or similar haLards7
2 Air
Will the proposal result in
a
Substantial air emissions or deterior-
ation of ambient air quality?
b
The creation of objectionable odors?
c
Alteration of air movement, moisture,
or temperature, or any change in
`
climate, whether locally or regionally?
3 Water Will the proposal result in
a
Substantial changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b
Substantial changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?
c
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
d
Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body?
e
Discharge into surface waters, or in
any alteration of surface water qual-
ity, including, but not limited to,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbid ity7
—
f
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
—
r
4
5
— - Yes�-
g Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through inter-
ception of an aquifer by cuts or ` n
excavations? YI
h___Substantial_reduction_in the_amount....__-________
of water otherwise available for ---
public water supplies?
i Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life Will the proposal result in
a Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
b Reduction of the numbers of any T
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
c Introduction of new species of plants
into an area of native vegetation, or
in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Substantial reduction to acreage of
any agricultural crop? t
Animal Life Will the proposal result in
a Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
b Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes
6
Noise Will the proposal result in
a Increases in existing noise levels?
b Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
7--
Light and -Glare- -Will-th-e-proposal-p-roduc-e
--
substantial new light or glare?
8
Land Use Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
9
Natural Resources Will the proposal
result in
a Substantial increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10
Risk of Upset Will the proposal involve
a A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
b Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan 7
11
Population Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an areal
12
Housing Will the proposal affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional
housing?
13
Transportation/Circulation Will the pro -
proposal result in
a Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Maybe No
v
An,
x
11
14
Ili
16
b Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d Alterations to present patterns of
circulation -or movement of people
and/or goods?
e Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a need
for new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas
a Fire protection?
b Police protection?
c Schools 7
d Parks or other recreational faci-
lities7
e Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f Other governmental services?
Energy Will the proposal result in
a Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or re-
quire the development of new sources
of energy?
Utilities Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities
a Power or natural gas?
Yes Maybe No
b Communications systems?
c Water?
d Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainages
-�-e
f Solid waste and disposal?
—
17 Human Health Will the proposal result
in
a Creation of any health hazard or
'
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health) ?
x
I`
T�
b Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18 Aesthetics Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
19 Recreation. Will the proposal result to
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
—
20 Cultural Resources
a Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or historic archaeo-
logical site?
b Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or oblect7
c Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values
21
Yes Maybe No
d Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact areal
Mandatory Findings of Significance
a Does the project have the potential
-_-temdegrade fhe__guality of the_enva.ron- _____
ment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which oc-
curs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the future ) _X
c Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant )
d Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETEMB I NAIIDN
On the basis of this initial evaluation
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared
1 -find- that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets have been added to the
project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on'
she environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required
ate
David Sawyer
Planning D.-r for
ignature
For City of Grand Terrace
Planning
Department
—__III. DISCUSBIOW- OY-THY
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1. b, 3 b The development of this predominantly vacant
site will result in the overcovering of a large
percentage of the soil by paving and
structures This impact will be mitigated by
utilizing proper drainage methods which will
be reviewed and approved by the Building and
Engineering Department
6 a The existing noise levels will increase as a
result of the development of this multi -family
residential development in an area that is
almost completely developed. This impact will
be within the allowable levels as set in the
Master Environmental Analysis for the General
Plan.
6 b This project has been conditioned to reduce the
noise level to a dBA reading acceptable to the
San Bernardino County Environmental Health
Services Department.
7. This project will result in new light to be
added to this area However, this impact will
be mitigated by the City of Grand Terraces'
ordinance requiring all lighting be designed
to confine direct rays to the premises and
specifically, direct rays away from adjacent
properties.
8. The existing land use will intensify with this
new development. This proposed use is
inaccordance with the adopted General Plan's
Medium Density Residential land use designation
and will not exceed the maximum density
allowed
22795 Barton Road 9 Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
13 a There is the possibility that this development
will increase the overall vehicular movement
in the area. However, the impact of
approximately 46 additional cars that would be
added to the area was taken into consideration
during the development of the General Plan
Master Plan of Streets anbd Highways and was
planned for at that time with regards to the
carrying- capacity- of Newport- Avenue . -
DATE Sept 8, 1 98 q
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Sept 14, 1989
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF DEDICATION -- 11830 Mt VernonAve15
-----------------------------------
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
At the City Council Meeting of May 5, 1989, Council considered
accepting dedication at 11830 Mt Vernon Ave in consideration
for frontage improvements Staff was directed to report in more
detail the engineering cost estimate for the potential improve-
ments
At that time three alternatives were presented
1 The full improvements of the right-of-way to include curb/
gutter/sidewalk and landscaping
2 Potential improvements which include paving to the ultimate
paving width with no curb/gutter/sidewalk
3 To do no improvements
The City Engineer has prepared a detailed estimate of the
proposed costs There was some questions, initially, regarding
the retaining wall That item can be eliminated if the property
owner allows the City a temporary easement to provide grading,
which will eliminate the need for the wall The full
improvements are estimated to be $37,404 25, the partial
improvements would be at a cost of $15,162 50
0
In discussions with Dr McDuffee there is not complete agreement
in the area of potential earth work, the need for two street
lights rather than one, and he indicated that he would relocate
item no 17 at his own cost which would save an additional $150
Even considering the potential negotiability of these items, the
cost for the total improvements would be between $30,000 and
$37,000 A final figure could not be determined until the City
actually went out to bid If it is the desire of the Council to
consider the improvements, the final cost could only be
determined with the award of the bid which also would require
N6 ,, ;ice
-2-
Council action Dr McDuffee has indicated that he would only
dedicate right-of-way for the grading improvements and would not
accept alternative no 2 to allow any temporary grading to be done
on his private property This leaves the Council with
alternatives 1 and 3 consider
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT
--COUNCIL CONSIDER -ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF THE�2-IGHT-OF-WAY FOR
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TS bt
Attachment
PLEASE NOTE Refer to your July 13, 1989 packet for the map outlining
the improvements
)LFLP-4,A'E ,All
I Vt-tiNUN STREET ThPROVEhLNTS -
SOB tSTI`1ATE FILE MT VERNON
UATE 7/ 5/B9
TIME 9 4 54
TEh1 I
---- -- --
DESCRIRTION
TOTAL
- -- -- --- -
QUANTITY
_____
PRICE
PRICE
CLEARING AND GRU88I,lG------------------
-
LARTHWORK (400 Cy IMPORT MATERIAL) -- -'-
1
00
L
S
Q
1,500
00 •
!
1,500
0(
3
�" CURB AND GUTTER ------ ----'-'-'-
400
00
C
Y
Q
5
00 =
!
2,000
0(
4
UAWIAULE HCIGHT CURB d GUTTER ----------
308
00
L
F
B
10
00 �
!
3,080
O(13
5
P C C SIDEWALK -------- __ __
50
L
F
Q
12
00
S 162
0(
b
_
-' C C UkIVtWAY------------------------ --------
1,621
00
S
F
Q
2
75 =
!
4,457
7:
7
CATCH BASIN (,J - 4')---------- ---------
312
00
S
F
Q
3
50
f
1,092
0(
0
FUNCTION STRUCTURE ---------------_______
1
00
L
S
Q
2,500
00
f
2,500
OC
`J
191 R C P 1D-1500)---------___
1
00
L
S
Q
2,000
00 =
f
2,000
OC
10
______
.A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2" THICK -------
94
00
L
F
Q
45
00 =
1
1,530
00
11
G" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE - ----
45
00
TONS
0
85
00
f
3;825
00
12
-
77Af�IAHLE THICKNESS A C OVERLAY - - --'--
100
00
TONS
Q
25
00 -
!
2,500
00
13
FOG SEAL _ _ _ __ ______
50
00
TONS
Q
85
00
f
4,250
00
14
SAWCUT AND REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM - ''--
840
00
S
Y
Q
0
50
f 420
00
15
PEMOVE A C PAVEMENT ----- ___
325
00
L
F
Q
1
50 =
f 487
50
16
-PLLOCATE WATER METER -------- ---------'
300
00
S
F
(�
1
00
f 300
00
17
ELOCATE HOSE BIBB---------- -----------
1
00
EA
B
250
00
i 250
00
",--..
LLOCAIE 4' WI E S POST FENCE ----------
2
00
EA
Q
75
00
i 150
00
19
TREE REMOVAL ---------__ _ _
180
00
L
F
Q
5
00 =
f 900
00
d0
UPNAMENTAL STREETLIGHTS -------- ----'-'
5
00
EA
(2
400
00
f
2,000
00
21
HRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING ------ ------'
2
00
EA
Q
750
00
f
1,500
00
1
00
LS
Q
2,500
00
f
2 500
00
TOTAL
JOB ESTIMATE
-------------
f
37,+04
25
L-4EMIATE =-BII -
I VLRNON GIREET IMPROVEMENTS
J8 ESTIMATE FILE 12 4219
UA1E 7/ 5/89
TIME 9 8 43
[TEM DESCRIPTION
i LEAPING AND GRUBBING ------------------
2 EARTHWORK (50 CY IMPORT MATERIAL) ------
8 A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2" THICK-------------
4 6" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE ------------
5 VARIABLE THICKNESS A C OVERLAY--------
6 FOG SEAL ------------------------------
7 SAWCUT 6 REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM-------
0 REMOVE A C PAVEMENT -------------------
9 RELOCATE 4' WIRE I POST FENCE ------ ----
10 A C ORIVEWAY APPROACH ------- ---------
QUANTITY
1
00
L 8 9
50
00
C Y 0
45
00
TONS Q
100
00
TONS a
50
00
TONS 0
840
00
S Y Q
325
00
L F 4
200
00
S F 9
180
00
L F 9
220
00
S F 2
UNIT
- ------
TOTALY v
PRICE
PRICE
2,000
00
=
S
21000 00
3
00
=
f 250 00
85
00
=
S
3,825 00
23
00
$
2,500 00
85
00
=
t
4,250 00
0
50
! 420 00
1
50
• 487 50
1
00
=
$ 200 00
5
00
8 900 00
1
50
-------------
$ 330 00
TOTAL JOB ESTIMATE = f 15,162 50
I
TE Sept 11, 1989
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Sept 14, 1989
SUBJECT EXTENSION OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ON MICHIGAN
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
Staff had been directed by Council to explore alternatives on
extending the pedestrian walkway on Michigan
As previously reported, the City does not currently have a
ma3ority of the right-of-way needed to install sidewalks on
Michigan between Main Street and Barton Road We do, however,
have sufficient right-of-way between DeBerry Street and Barton
Road on the east side to provide a pedestrian walkway as showm in
the attached drawing This proposal would provide a separate 31-,
foot walkway that would provide pedestrian access the entire
distance from DeBerry Street to Barton Road This particular
improvement could be done within our existing right-of-way and,
even though it does not represent the ultimate development that
would be required in the future, it provides interim pedestrian
facilities
Staff is still considering our options for sidewalks to continue
south and will report back to Council when our recommendation has
been formulated
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT
COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO GO OUT TO BID FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
THAT COST APPROXIMATELY $10,000 AT THE TIME OF THE BID AWARD
STAFF WILL REQUEST AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE COUNCIL
TS bt
Attachments
�GUNCIL i,Gt ADA 78
f,1 AIN lwmu w
1) GE r,E:Y 3 i
JUH ESTIMATE FILL
DAl I
1 lM[
& BAr2 FON PD
12 4,27
O/ 2lOv
9 Ji 41
1r� OF DckaPrioN
([ r_Ar,i.(C Am, GPUFsL,1 l; — — --- — _ —-
s c' 1 /21, A r PAVCH NT — — — -----_ _ _
I rlArrzr DI L 1NEATOPS
`J t+ C PAVLMFNT PEMOVAL
u A C L)Aw(—U1 ————— — — — — —— — — — — —— — — -
7 '31 GN r,L I O(W 1 O 1
i OTAI
QUANTI rr
PPICE
P141Cr
1
00
L S
L
500 00
500
00
50
00
TONS
@
125 00 —
$ 6,250
00
30
00
EA
@
713 00 =
$ 2,250
00
785
00
L I
@
1 00 -
$ 785
00
140
00
S F
@
t 00 -
$ 140
00
/0
00
L F=
P
1 00 -
$ 70
00
1
00
EA
@
50 00 -
$ 50
00
TOTAL
JOB Ec)f TMATr- _
$ 10, 04 5
00
ORDINANCE NO 118
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING_—
Z-89-2, CHANGING A PORTION OF AREA 8A FROM
ZONE R1-10A TO R1-20
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a revised General Plan on December 8,
1988, and
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Districts shall be revised to conform with the
revised General Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to revise the Title 18, of the Municipal
Code (the Zoning Ordinance), and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 1989, the City Council approved Z-89-IA revising Chapter
18 09 of the Municipal Code which establishes the City's various zoning districts, and
'`- WHEREAS, the City Council desired to reconsider the zoning of Area 8A, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing for Z-89-2, the
reconsideration of Area 8A, and
WHEREAS, the changes considered in Z-89-2 were considered in the negative
declaration for Z-891A, and
WHEREAS, the revised Zoning Map per Z-89-2 is attached as Exhibit "A", and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting of March 6, 1989,
recommended to the City Council that Z-89-1 (which included the Area 8A) as
recommended in Planning Commission Resolution PC 89-1 be approved, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on August
24, 1989, and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1 The revised Zoning Map per Z-89-2, is attached as Exhibit A is
approved and adopted by this City Council
SECTION 2 Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at
12 01 AM on the 31st day of its adoption
SECTION 3 Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in
three` (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, -as--designated- for such
purpose by the City Council
SECTION 4 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held
on the 24th day of August, 1989, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular
meeting of said City Council on the 14th day of September, 1989
ATTEST
City Clerk of the City
of Grand Terrace and of
the City Council thereof
Mayor of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City
Council thereof
4 I, JUANITA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 14th day of September, 1989 by
the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
City Clerk
Approved as to form
City Attorney
ZONE CHANGE
AREA 8A
Z 89-2
EXHIBIT A
Date_ 9/6/89
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (✓f MEETING DATE 9/14189
SUBJECT Appeal of the August 21, 1989 Planning Commission Decision CUP-
89-4, Terbest and Associates) Conditions #4 and #5 7S
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
BACKGROUND
On August 21, 1989, the Planning Commission approved application CUP-89-
4 for a General Assembly Room at 21900 Barton Road, Suite #120 with the
following conditions of approval
1 The maximum capacity of the "general assembly room" shall
be 125 persons (including employees, security and serving
staff
2 All activities associated with the "general assembly
room" shall be contained within Suite #120, no related
activities shall be conducted in any outdoor area
3 During all activities where there is more than 35 persons
in attendance and/or alcoholic beverages are served, a
uniformed security officer shall be present for the
duration of the activity An additional uniformed
security officer is required for a total of two officers
if there are 75 or more persons attending an activity
4 All wedding reception
beverages are served,
recorded) is provided,
persons in attendance
of operation
Fridays
Saturdays
Sundays
activities, any activity where alcoholic
any activity where music (live or
and/or any activity with more than 35
shall be limited to the following hours
500 pm to 1000 pm
800 am to 1000 pm
1200 pm to 600 pm
5 No activities shall extend beyond 10 00 p in
6 All persons and/or groups who use this facility shall be given
a copy of these conditions and a copy of the Grand Terrace
Noise Ordinance and shall sign an affidavit acknowledging the
receipt and compliance of same
7 Special holiday activities and hours may be approved by the
-- - - - - --- - - Planning -Director upon prior -writ -ten request -- - - - - - - -- --- — - -- --
8 This conditional use permit is good for a period of one year
from the date of approval It will expire on August 22, 1990
It may be extended by the Planning Commission upon written
application by the applicant prior to its expiration
Subsequently, the applicant has appealed this decision in regards to
conditions #4 and #5
Additionally, Councilman Singley has appealed the Planning
Commission's decision in its entirety which permits the City Council to
discuss any aspect of the Conditional Use Permit
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends the City Council deny CUP-89-4
based on the findings stated in the attached Planning Commission Staff
Report dated August 21, 1989
Respectfully Submitted,
David R Sawyer,
Community Development Director
DRS/mcm
RAND TEI
Planning
Department
TO. Planning Commission
FROM: David Sawyer, Community Development Director
DATE: August 21, 1989
SUBJECT. Staff Report, CUP-89-4
APPLICANT: David Terbest
LOCATION. 21900 Barton Road, #120
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit for a general assembly room
located in the C-2 District
ZONING AND LANDUSE:
Property
GP
Zoning
Land Use
Subs ect Property
GC
C2
R e t a 1 1
Center
To the West
MDR
R3
Mobile Home
Park
To the East
GC
C2
R e t a 1 1
Center
To the North
GC
C2
Vacant
To the South
GC
C2
V e h 1 c 1 e
Storage Yard
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The proposed project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption as defined
in the California Environmental Quality Act
ITEM 3
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terra(-c, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
DISCUSSION•
On July 17, 1989 the applicant applied for a Determination of Use
by the Planning Commission to determine if a "general assembly
room" is a permitted use in the City's C2 District At that time
the Planning Commission determined that a "general assembly room"
is a permitted use in the C2 District with a conditional use
permit Subsequently, the applicant has applied for a conditional
______use permit to a11owa '!general assembl_y__room'!_use to be -located-a-t-- — -
2k900, Barton Road, Suite 120
The applicant has indicated the room will be limited to the
- following uses
1. Conferences and meetings associated with the
applicant's insurance business
2 Photography studio
3 General assembly purposes (meetings, dinners,
dances, etc ) for non-profit organizations and
the ad]acent RV park
4 Wedding receptions (Saturday afternoons and
evenings only)
5 On -site consumption of alcoholic beverages (a conditional
use permit is necessary for the service of alcoholic
beverages for the purpose of on -site consumption on
commercially zoned property in the City of Grand
Terrace)
PLANNING ISSUES•
Pursuant to Section 18 66 040 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code,
certain findings must be made for approval of a Conditional Use
Permit These findings as well as staff responses to them are as
follows
1 Will the proposed use be detrimental to the general
health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons
residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or
within the City>
Yes One of the proposed uses of the facility is to serve as
a dinner, dance and wedding reception facility, which may include
on -site consumption of alcoholic beverages Such uses have the
potential to create loud and ob3ectionable noise at various hours
of the day and evening which may impose a negative impact on the
adDacent residential mobile home park (located within 100 feet of
the proposed use) and other businesses within the center
Additionally, the proposed uses creates a shortage of 38 parking
spaces (25%) in the existing reta,_7 renter t.e- %--- I I i r
rup to 88 spaces (43%) short if the ad]acent outdoor patio is used,
thereby creating a detrimental effect on the neighboring retail
businesses and overall success of the retail center when this use
is in operation
2 Will the proposed use be in]urious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or within the City
_TNo `The proposed —use should -not effect any physical property
or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City with the
j exception of any actions which would result from the shortage of
parking created by this proposal or the lack of security personnel
attending a specific event
3 Will the proposed use be consistent with the latest
adopted General Plan?
Yes The current General Plan designates this property as
General Comercial.
4 Are conditions necessary to secure the purpose of this
section?
Yes Several conditions of approval would be necessary for
this proposal, however, it is staff's opinion that the parking
shortage created by the proposed use is too great to be mitigated
by conditions of approval, nor can the proposed use's impact on the
ad3acent mobile home park be sufficiently mitigated, therefor, the
use as proposed should not be approved
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Grand Terrace Planning
Commission deny CUP-89-4 based on the fact that the proposed use
is not in compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code (Chapter
18 60) and the above listed findings
Respectf y submitted by
David Sawyer,
ft
RfSEeS'IrC3[lc-ScSUC[IT'P$cS—
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC
- - - Jun-e-30-1 1989
Mr Thomas Schwab
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Rd
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
RE Planning Commission Determination
Dear Tom
As we discussed, TerBest & Associates has leased Building A of the Terrace
Village Plaza
The front of the building is to be occupied by my insurance agency, approxi-
mately 3,900 square feet The remaining 2,000 square feet we would like to
use as a conference roan
This roan is intended to be used by TerBest & Associates and their related
clients However, to maximize efficiency of the room, we would like a de-
termination from the Planning Commission on compliance in the C-2 zone
The building has allocated parking for 75 automobiles and would allow a maximum
of 150 people We would be willing to limit any daytime activities to groups
of 50 people or less, for the hours of 9-5 This would lima„`interference
with parking for other tenants in the center
We will comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to use of such
a facility The occasional late use would be limited to Chamber of Commerce
installations and other public functions, so as not to disturb the neighboring
community
Before we commit to the build out expense, we felt that a determination by the
Planning Commission was in order, since the C-2 zone did not address the
specific use
This room would also be made availble to the R V Park when completed as a
recreation hall for possible dinners and square dances
Sincerely,
David W TerBest
TELEPHONE (714) 783 1515 / FAX (714) 783 1966
P 0 BOX 5159 • SM BERNARDINO, CA 92412
r� -
„_19
JUL 0 6 1989 J -
TED—MoST 0 AcScSOC1ATFTS
INSURANCE SERVICES
July 6, 1989
Mr Thomas Schwab
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, Ca 92324
It is our intention to use the facility for the following uses
1 Conferences and meetings in conjunction with our firm's major
corporpation, TerBest & Associates, Inc
2 Photo studio shooting in conjunction with our TerBest Commer-
cial Photography
3 Saturday afternoon & evening reception for our Wedding Connec-
tion business
4 Non-profit rental of room for business and community functions
le , Chamber of Commerce installation, Christmas dinners, etc
5 The room has been down graded from our original planned use as
a Community Hall with a full kitchen facility We are now plann-
ing to have a small food preparation room only for catered
foods
6 The room will also be used in conjunction with the future R V
Park as a meeting room and occasional square dance
Eventually TerBest & Associates will probably aquire a beer & wine
license through a Non -Profit Corporation to have available for moderate
consumption
It is our opinion that this use is clearly allowable in the C-2
zone but before we expend the necessary funds to build out the
facility we want a formal determination by the Planning Com-
ission
S nc ely,
W
Da A W TerBest
DWT ss
TELEPHONE (714) 370-0330►;
P O BOX 5159 • SAN BERNARDINO CA 92412
22365 BARTON ROAD 9 SUITE250 • GRAND TERRACE CkIFORNIA92324
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM 00 MEETING DATE 9-14-89
- - _ = - =-SUBJECT Fina1- Parcel Map 109155 �TPM-87--EFox _-- -_
Discussion of Palm Trees
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
BACKGROUND
On December 3, 1987, City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 10915 (TPM-
87-9/Fox) with a condition of dedication to provide 33 feet of half street
right of way on Pico Street This necessitates the removal of six palm
trees On July 7, 1989 the applicant (Stephen Fox) submitted for a final
parcel map
On September 8, 1988, City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 14078 (TTM-
88-2/Karger) which is located directly across Pico Street from Mr Fox's
property It was Mr Karger's wish to retain the palm trees within a
median and form a Landscape and Lighting District to maintain them The
City Council conditioned Mr Karger's map to retain the palm trees as Mr
Karger asked
Presently, Mr Fox is
ready to
final
his tentative
map which requires the
removal of the palm
trees In
order
to solve this
situation and allow Mr
Fox to final his map
in a timely manner, staff sent the attached letter to
Mr Karger providing
him with
two
(2) alternative
actions with regard to
his tentative map
However,
Mr
Karger's response was less than
cooperative As a
result, Mr
Fox
has requested
that the City Council
reconsider the issue of the palm trees
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests direction from City Council regarding condition #3 of
Tentative Parcel Map 10915, and conditions #3 and #4 of Tentative Tract Map
14078
Respectfully Submitted,
David R Sawyer,
Community Development Director
David R Sawyer
Planning Director
City Council Members
City Of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92324
Dear Mr Sawyer and City Council Members ,
Concerning my lot subdivision known as Parcel Map 10915, I understand
there is some question as to Pico Street where it fronts my property and
some palm trees that might hold up the processing of the Final Map
I ask you to please give some consideration to the time and money
I have already spent on the many different proceedures of processing this
map through the city I ask that you clarify your position, as we are now
ready to request that you approve our Final Map
Re ectfu \ounr�s,
vv/
Stev and Karen Fox
382 E Bonnieview Dr
Rialto, California 92376
cITY
^ j / of
;AHD TO
July 26, 1989
Mr Barney Karger
11668 Bernardo Way
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Mr Karger,
Planrlul-
Dlpa11111c.nt
This letter is in regards to your Tentative Tract Map 14078 (TTM-88-
2) and the issue of the six palm trees you wish to preserve
As you are aware Mr Stephen Fox is subdividing the property across
Pico Street from your property Recently, Mr Fox applied for approval of
his Parcel Map which is conditioned with a street improvement requirement
which necessitates the removal of the palm trees In addition, it has been
discovered that in order for the palm trees to remain and survive it will
be necessary to raise the trees approximately two feet to accommodate the
finished grade of Pico Street
In light of Mr Fox's current application, staff feels that it is
appropriate to address this problem at this time Consequently, if it
remains your desire to preserve the palm trees then it is your
responsibility to complete one of the following alternatives
Altei native #1
Within 60 days from the date of this letter, construct your
required street improvements for Pico Street including the
proposed medians and raise the palm trees the necessary height
in relation to the finished grade elevation of Pico Street
Alternative #2
Within 60 days from the date of this letter, remove the palm
trees from their exming location
If neither of the two alternatives are complied with after 60 days as
stated, Mr Fox will be allowed to continue with his Parcel Map and its
22795 Baiton Road • Grand Teriace, California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621
r
v
----I L,Lju 111A UYU e'ii s wini�tr wttr�- i�c ess ate the removal o tie
palm trees
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the actions
required, please contact me this week or after August 14, 1989 (due to
vacation scheduling) or Joe Kicak, the City Engineer
_--- __ - - - --- -Sincerely,
DRS/mcm
David R Sawyer,
Community Development Director