The URL can be used to link to this page

11/09/198922795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Gene Carlstrom Barbara Pfenmghausen } Jim Smgley Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager s f � k:. 't .1✓ ' o- November 9, 1989 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursdays — 6 00 p in Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road Call to Order - * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call November 9, 1989 600PM STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 Approval of 10/26/89 Minutes Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1 Items to Delete 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A Drug -Free Poster Contest Awards B Introduction of New Citizen Patrol Members 3 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion Approve A Approve Check Register No 110989 B Ratify 11/09/89 CRA Action COUNCIL AGENDA 11/09/89 - Page 2 of 2 C. Waive full reading of ordinances on agenda D Approve 10/19/89 & 10/26/89 Minutes E Attendance at the Finance Management Seminar, December 6-8, 1989, Monterey, Ca 4 PUBLIC COMMENT 5 ORAL REPORTS A Committee Reports 1 Parks & Recreation Committee (a) Minutes of 10/02/89 B Council Reports 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 00 P M A Tentative Tract Map - TTM-89-03 UNFINISHED BUSINESS A Consideration of McDuffee Improvements/ Dedication 8 NEW BUSINESS A Fire Station Lease Renewal 9 CLOSED SESSION ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 14, 1989 AT 6 00 P M ---------------------------------------------- AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 12/14/89 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 12/07/89 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Accept COUNCIL ACTION "'ki. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 26, 1989 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 26, 1989, at 6 05 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Chairman Hugh J. Grant, Vice -Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Gene Carlstrom, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Secretary David Sawyer, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT Joe Kicak, City Engineer APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 19, 1989 CRA MINUTES CRA-89-33 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GRANT, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve October 19, 1989 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. 102689 CRA-89-34 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register No. 102689. Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 10 p.m. until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, November 9, 1989 at 6 00 p.m. CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace 11 EN1 NO CITY OF GRAND T` --ACE PENDING CfTy e , DATE NOVEMBE,, 1989 ' ' CHEtF &Sl� 'NO 110989 :CK 1BER VENDOR OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF NOVEMBER 9, 1989 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 407 CITY/COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 26, 1989 $ 18 00 408 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION PATCH STREETS-MICHIGAN/LA CADENA, REPAIRS -REED, CARDINAL, KENTFIELD, AND BRENTWOOD, PLACE TREES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, AND SEAL COAT AT COMMUNITY CENTER 15,095 43 409 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/20/89 270 41 410 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/20/89 166 78 411 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/23/89 36 18 412 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/23/89 11 14 413 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO GRIND/RESURFACE CARDINAL, REED, AND WILLET, IN CONJUNCTION WITH RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 22,750 00 414 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/24/89 131 25 415 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/24/89 9 77 416 MONOGRAMS, ETC HATS FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC 745 50 417 PARTYS' PLUS HELIUM/BALLONS FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC AND HALLOWEEN HAUNT 184 96 418 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/26/89 303 26 419 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/26/89 105 46 420 JUANITA BROWN SUPPLIES FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC 148 74- 421 GRAND TERRACE PARENT TEACHERS, ASSOCIATION AWARDS FOR GRAND TERRACE ELEMENTRY SCHOOL, HALLOWEEN PARADE 235 00 422 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/31/89 487 29 423rn SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 10/31/89 i92 50 �424 v THOMAS SCHWAB SUPPLIES FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC 140 85 1806 A & M TROPHY SERVICE AWARDS FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC 147 72 1807 DR GAINES PARTRIDGE REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 17 00 1808 CONNIE SCHMELING REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 8 00 1 CITY OF GRAND T... ACE DATE NOVEMBE, 1989 CHECK REGIST''_ NO 110989 CK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF NOVEMBER 9, 1989 BER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 309 RICH JONES REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES $ 14 73 310 DALE JOHANSEN REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 3 47 311 AT&T INFORMATION CENTER RENT PHONE FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 4 35 312 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN PRINT LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING ASSESSMENT SURVEY 109 94 313 ALL OCCASION AWARDS AWARDS, HALLOWEEN HAUNT 81 09 314 RANDALL ANSTINE AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR NOVEMBER, 1989 200 00 315 THE BANNER BARN BANNER FOR COUNTRY FAIR 219 00 316 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER FOR CIVIC CENTER AND DAY CARE 114 25 817 BECKLEY CARDY SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE 451 72 818 BOMAR TREE SERVICES REMOVE TREE STUMPS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS 1,325 00 819 AMY CARTER BABYSITTER FOR AEROBICS 110 00 820 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEAN REST ROOMS AT PARK ON DE BERRY (4 DAYS) 80 00 821 CITY OF COLTON WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR NOVEMBER, 1989 AND ONE CONNECTION FOR OCTOBER, 1989 33,340 14 822 HAINES & COMPANY, INC CRISS/CROSS DIRECTORY 145 91 823 DAY -TIMER, INC DAY TIMER CLENDAR REFILL 19 45 824 DFM ASSOCIATES CALIFORNIA ELECTION CODE 29 00 825 F & W SMITH SUPPLIES FOR HALLOWEEN HAUNT 71 09 826 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION EXPRESS MAIL, TOUR -DE -TERRACE 23 00 827 FIRE MASTER SERVICE FIRE EXTINQUISHERS, CIVIC CENTER 159 51 828 G T MAILERS MAIL PICK-UP FOR SEPTEMBER, 1989, AND STUFF CRIME PREVENTION FLYERS INTO CHAMBER NEWSLETTER 125 00 �829 GRAND TERRACE URGENT CARE PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 73 00 1830 HQ OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 93 85 i831 HARPER & BURNS LEGAL SERVICES FOR JULY, 1989 2,221 25 2 CITY OF GRAND "RACE V DATE NOVEMB,,, 9, 1989 CHECK REGIS, : NO 110989 HECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF IIMRFR VFNnOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT )832 HONEYWELL, INC )833 HOUSTON HARRIS )834 KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION )835 LELAND NURSERY )836 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE )837 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS )838 MINUTE MAN PRESS )839 JEAN MYERS )840 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY )841 PHIL PAGE )842 PACIFIC BELL )843 THE PETRA COMPANIES )844 PETTY CASH )845 PETTY CASH )846 PETTY CASH )847 PRECINCT REPORTER )848 RICHARD REYNOSA )849 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )850 DAVID SAWYER )851 THOMAS SCHWAB )852 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY )853 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY MAINTENANCE ON HVAC UNIT ANT CIVIC CENTER, NOVEMBER, 1989 CLEAN STORM DRAINS AT VISTA GRANDE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES, PARK CABINET FOR CHILD CARE LONG DISTANCE PHONE PRINT NEWSLETTERS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS CROSSING GUARD, 10/9-10/20/89 PLUS RETROACTIVE PAY, 9/11-10/6/89 MAINTENANCE ON ELEVATOR, NOVEMBER, 1989 OPEN/CLOSE PARK ON DE BERRY, SEPTEMBER, 1989 PHONE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER, AND CIVIC CENTER MONTHLY NEUILETTER FOR CRIME PREVENTION REIMBURSEMENT OF PETTY CASH, GENERAL REIMBURSEMENT OF PETTY CASH, GENERAL REIMBURSEMENT OF PETTY CASH, CHILD CARE LEGAL NOTICE, DBE SCOREKEEPER FOR SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL, 10/5-10/26/89 PARKING CITATIONS FOR JULY-SEPTEMBER, 1989 AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR NOVEMBER, 1989 AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR NOVEMBER, 1989 SUPPLIES FOR VOLUNTEER PICNIC AND CANDY FOR HALLOWEEN HAUNT ELECTRIC FOR BALL PARK LIGHTS AND SPRINKLERS AT PARK ON ON DE BERRY 1,043 00 300 00 49 20 407 04 250 40 58 78 66 78 172 59 205 07 35 00 762 86 27 24 369 04 31 83 175 38 71 82 132 50 7 50 200 00 200 00 599 54 312 96 3 iECK 1MBER VENDOR 854 SOUTHWESTERN CASH REGISTER 855 THE SUN 856 0 C TANNER COMPANY 857 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS 1858 UNOCAL 1859 WEST COMPUTIL CORPORATION CITY OF GRAND %-"RACE DATE NOVEMbcm 9, 1989 OUTSTANDING DEi1ANDS AS OF DESCRIPTION �f CHECK REGISILP, NO 110989 MAINTENANCE ON CASH REGISTER, ONE YEAR NOTICE, REVENUE/EXPENDITURES, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, AND AD FOR RECREATION EMPLOYEE AWARDS UMPIRES FOR SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL, 10/16-10/31/89 FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS, EQUIPMENT AND CHILD CARE VAN PROCESS PARKING CITATIONS, AUGUST/SEPTEMBER, 1989 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER, 1989 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 250 00 503 37 508 87 90 00 221 98 10 50 67,003 70 $154,286 94 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR rn PENDING CITY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 19, 1989 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 19, 1989, at 6 00 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Engineer ABSENT Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Larry Wilson, Praise Fellowship Foursquare Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Grant. ,'-- Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m. ITEMS TO DELETE SPECIAL PRESENTATION Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 05 p.m. None. 2A. Grand Terrace Youth Basketball Club potential request for appropriation. Eileen Hodder, 22253 Van Buren, Treasurer of the Grand Terrace Area Youth Basketball Club gave a presentation and requested financial aid to help with the cost of renting the Colton High School gymnasium. Councilmember Pfennighausen, indicated that due to the fact that there are no facilities in Grand Terrace she would encourage the Council to assist the Basketball Club with an appropriation of $1,000. UIC(L" AGENDA ITEA2 a 2 1) Council Minutes - 10/19/89 Page 2 CC-89-188 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, to appropriate $1,000 to assist the Grand Terrace Youth Basketball Club. Mayor Matteson, felt that $1,000 is too high and indicated that he could not support that amount. Councilmember Singley, indicated that he would agree to 500 to cover the cost of the gymnasium if the maker of the motion would agree. Councilmember Pfennighausen, indicated that she would be reluctant to compromise below $750. CC-89-189 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN VOTED NOE), to amend the motion to $500 to cover the cost of the gymnasium. Councilmember Pfenni hausen, indicated that she will vote for the 500 although the City is supporting them to a lesser extent than anybody else is supported in youth activities in this community. CC-89-190 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED t 5-0, to appropriate $500 to support the Grand Terrace Youth Basketball Club. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-89-191 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC COMMENT ORAL REPORTS A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 101289 B. RATIFY 10/19/89 CRA ACTION C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA D. APPROVE 9/28/89 MINUTES Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry, Grand Terrace, encouraged the residents of Grand Terrace to read the Earthquake Preparedness Booklets that were distributed to homeowners earlier this year. 5B. Council Reports Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that in light of the events in northern California, we should get our emergency plan ready to go and suggested that the Emergency Council Minutes - 10/19/89 Page 3 Operations Committee be contacted to see when the plan will be ready for adoption, she reported that it has been called to her attention that several senior citizen activities are being held at the Community Center and it was suggested that a painted white stripe or reflector tape be placed on the edge of the steps. Councilmember Carlstrom, reported that the City of Colton is scheduled to make their decision this week regarding the placement of the L.J. Snow Ford Dealership so they may be open for negotiations again, he reported that he has talked to the County Solid Waste Manager and the company who has proposed to put a landfill in the area, apparently has little chance of obtaining the proper permits. Councilmember Singley, reported that there are four proposals in front of the County to handle a lot of the solid waste in a positive manner. Mayor Pro Tem Grant, reported that he attended a portion of the Omnitrans meeting on October 4th and attended a SANBAG meeting on the same day, he attended a meeting of the Local Agency Formation Commission on October 18th and also the annual convention, he read a statement in reference to items on the check register, stating that each Councilmember is entitled to $117 per month for health benefits, he asked the City Attorney the status of the billboard issue. City Attorney Harper, reported that our Ordinance has been found to be constitutional and the next step is for the defendant to file an answer. He indicated that he expects the defendant will file an appeal. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A. Lighting Assessment Survey City Manager Schwab, indicated that Council previously requested that staff prepare a draft survey for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. He recommended that if acceptable Council direct staff to mail out in the November sewer billing. Mayor Matteson, felt that the last line should be deleted indicating that it could be misleading. CC-89-192 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BE COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District survey as amended. Mayor Matteson recessed the City Council meeting at 6 25 P.M. Council Minutes - 10/19/89 Page 4 A meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, on October 19, 1989 at 6 25 p.m. Present Herman Hilkey, Commissioner Jimmy Sims, Commissioner Stanley Hargrave, Commissioner Fran VanGelder, Commissioner Dan Buchanan, Vice Chairman Jerry Hawkinson, Chairman Absent Ray Munson, Commissioner Planning Commission recessed at 6 30 P.M. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council at 6 30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of Intention - Approving a contract between the Board Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council. 6B. First Reading - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. City Manager Schwab, stated that Council had approved the employees joining the Public Employees' Retirement System and requested that Council adopt a Resolution of Intention and conduct the first reading for an Ordinance authorizing a contract between the City Council and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public. There being no public comment Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. Mayor Pro Tem Grant, asked if our employees would be entitled to a choice in health care plans. City Manager Schwab, indicated that we are not requesting the optional health care portion at this time, we are only considering PERS for the retirement and we will stay with our current health care plan. Mayor Matteson, asked if this plan will only cover full- time employees. Council Minutes - 10/19/89 Page 5 City Manager Schwab, stated that the plan will only cover full-time employees and for clarification there will be an addition to Section 4 of the contract to exclude temporary hourly employees from membership. CC-89-193 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON.$ SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to approve a Resolution of Intention and adopt an Ordinance authorizing a contract between the City Council and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. NEW BUSINESS 8A. Joint City Council/Planning Commission review of Specific Fl an Mayor Pro Tem Grant convened the Joint City Council/ Planning Commission workshop. Mayor Matteson abstained from discussion due to a potential conflict of interest. Community Development Director Sawyer, introduced Consultants Art Brodeur and Ron Pf ugrath from Urban Design Studios. The consultants gave an overview of the draft Barton Road Specific Plan as it is prepared to date. A slide presentation was given and the workshop portion of the meeting began with discussion between City Council, Planning Commission and the Consultants. It was agreed that the next meeting of the Specific Plan Review Committee would be November 1, 1989. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hawkinson adjourned the Planning Commission at 9 44 p.m., until the next regular Planning Commission meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Grant adjourned the City Council meeting at 9 45 p.m., until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held Thursday, October 26, 1989. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace. MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace. PENDING LIT' COM111L AF-PROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 26, 1989 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 26, 1989, at 6 00 p.m. PRESENT Byron Matteson, Mayor Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, City Clerk David Sawyer, Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT Joe Kicak, City Engineer The meeting was opened with invocation by Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Singley. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6 00 p.m. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6 05 p.m. ITEMS TO DELETE Item 8B - Fire Station Lease Agreement SPECIAL PRESENTATION Mayor Matteson read a Proclamation proclaiming the week of October 22-29, 1989 as "Red Ribbon Week." CONSENT CALENDAR CC-89-194 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar with the removal of Item D. Councilmember Pfennighausen expressed her objection to the payment of Check No. 20790 for payment on the Robert's parcel. MUW,I . AGENDA JTr-M # 3 D Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 2 A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 102689 B. RATIFY 10/26/89 CRA ACTION C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA E. SOLICITING PERMIT - MEALS FOR PEOPLE F. T.J. AUSTYN TRACT MAPS 13050-059 13050-06, 13050-Final ITEM FOR DISCUSSION 3D. Schedule November and December City Council meetings. Councilmember Pfennighausen, indicated that she will be out of town the week of November 16. CC-89-195 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED 5-0, to schedule the November and December City Council meetings for November 9th and December 14th. PUBLIC COMMENT ORAL REPORTS John R. Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, expressed his pleasure with the quick response he received on a complaint regarding a clogged drain on Vista Grande Way. Dick Yost, Immediate Past President of the Chamber of Commerce, reported on Chamber Events. 5A. Committee Reports 1. Emergency Operations Committee Council accepted Minutes of June 19, 1989 and July 17, 1989. 2. Historical & Cultural Committee Council accepted Minutes of October 2, 1989. 5B. Council Reports Councilmember Singley, explained that the reason he is not wearing a red ribbon is because he gave it away to the doctor who delivered his sister's baby and was unable to replace it. Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 3 NEW BUSINESS Councilmember Pfennighausen, indicated that a letter was overlooked at the previous Council meeting requesting sponsorship of a Youth Basketball team. She pointed out that the cost of sponsorship is $150 and a donation of $30 from each Councilmember would enable the Council to sponsor a team. Mayor Matteson indicated he is already sponsoring a team in the Basketball Club. City Attorney Harper and the remaining members of Council agreed to sponsor the basketball team. Mayor Pro Tem Grant, expressed his admiration for Vic Pfennighausen and others on the Emergency Operations Committee for all their hard work. Mayor Matteson, reported that he has talked to representatives from neighboring cities regarding their programs for planting trees and requested that staff contact the City of Rialto and Colton to get information that we can use in our City. 8A. Proposed Contract (assignment) - Bus Stop Shelters City Manager Schwab, reported that the bus stop shelters in Grand Terrace have been sold to Bustop Shelters of California, Inc. and we have received a request to transfer the license agreement. He indicated that the current agreement with Pedestal Post, the previous owners, prohibits transfer of the agreement without the consent of the City. Councilmember Carlstrom, asked if the City is allowing telephones to be placed at the bus stops City Manager Schwab, indicated that in order to place a telephone at a bus stop, they would have to go through the planning process and the City could refuse at that point. CC-89-196 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to enter into a new license agreement with Bustop Shelters of California, Inc identical to the agreement with Pedestal Post. PUBLIC HEARING 6A. Block Grant Fund Reallocation City Manager Schwab, gave a report indicating that we have received recommendations from both the Grand Terrace Lions' Club Community Center Improvement Committee as well as the Seniors' Center Committee of the Grand Terrace Seniors. Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 4 The Lions' Club Committee has recommended we make improvements to enhance the Senior/Community Center and the Grand Terrace Seniors are recommending that a separate facility be built at the Grand Terrace Road site utilizing a modular unit. Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public Phil Spisak, Grand Terrace Seniors' Group, requested that Council grant funds to open a Senior Center. She indicated that the group feels that they have outgrown their current facility and the center would also be available for other groups when not in use by the seniors. She stated that the group is willing to develop a funding plan that can include money raised by the seniors. Peggy Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, spoke in favor of funds being directed to a new Senior Center. Dwight Winans, 22528 Brentwood, felt that it would be in the best interest of the community to use the funds for the existing Community Center. Jim Rigley, 22605 DeSoto St., indicated that he would like to see funds spent to enhance the existing Community Center and felt that a new center for the seniors is not needed at this time. Harry Johnson, 22450 Flamingo St., felt that Grand Terrace should have a facility specifically allocated to seniors. Vic Pfennighausen, 12364 Pascal, spoke in favor of a new facility for the seniors. Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Dr., felt that the community will benefit more if the funds are spent on the Community Center. John R. Taylor, 22843 Vista Grande Way, asked if the facility would meet earthquake standards and if non senior citizens could take out a membership and what the cost would be. Phil Spisak, indicated that the new facility would meet earthquake standards and if necessary it could be placed on a concrete foundation. She stated that anyone over the age of 50 is eligable for membership and the cost of membership is $1 per year. She indicated that in speaking with seniors in other cities, centers such as the one proposed fill very quickly. Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 5 Eva Stanley, 22648 Cardinal, asked eligable for federal funding for a remain at the present facility. City Manager Schwab, indicated that the County Office on Aging that qualify for funding because of indicated that the seniors plan to will be run by volunteers. if the seniors would be nutritian center if they he has been informed by Grand Terrace does not the income level. He implement a program that Steve Kiacz, 11809 Holly St., felt that a usable facility would cost more than the estimated $109,000. Marcel Brusard, 22394 Van Buren, spoke in favor of funding for a new Senior Center. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, felt that the portable buildings are unatractive and for the amount of money requested the seniors should look into other alternatives. Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. Councilmember Singley, felt that this is a good opportunity for the Lion's Club to work with the developers to get special funding to work on the Community Center to make it a gateway to the community. He felt that this is also a good opportunity to develop the Grand Terrace Road park site with a senior citizen's theme. Mayor Matteson, felt that a workshop with the Lion's and Senior's, and a financial study is needed before a decision can be made. Councilmember Pfennighausen, had concern that the existing Community Center is not easily accessable for the seniors, she felt that the proposed site is ideal for a senior center, felt that there is a need for a senior day care center, which could not be done well at the present site, she felt that the senior's need a place of their own and encouraged Council to consider the plan Councilmember Carlstrom, agreed with Mayor Matteson that more information is needed before a decision is made. Mayor Pro Tem Grant, indicated that he would not object to a workshop if it is CounciI's desire, but he felt that staff has done a good job exploring all possibilities and he will support staff recommendations City Manager Schwab, indicated that the estimated prices ar�ominformal quotes from manufacturers. He reported that the Lion's Club and the Senior's have met together and Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 6 were unable to come up with a compromise to give the Senior's a room of their own. He indicated that he would like to look into other sources of funding for the Community Center so everyone's needs are met. Mayor Matteson, indicated that the City Manager has eliminated his concerns regarding the reality of the price estimates and that the two parties have met and were unable to come up with a compromise. He indicated that he would be willing to vote on the issue. CC-89-197 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve staff recommendation as follows 1. Council allocate $109,000 for the purchase of a modular unit and site improvements to be located on the land purchased from Mr. Roberts on Grand Terrace Road. 2. Council allocate $5,000 of the City's Community Development Block Grant Funding for pedestrian and handiap ramp installation at the existing Senior/Community Center. 3. Council direct the Senior Citizens' Group to develop a finance and funding plan for the operation of the Seniors' facility to include potential funding sources, as well as potential expenditures including initial capital startup expenditures. 4. Direct the Seniors' Group to develop a scheduling plan to ensure that the facility will be significantly utilized throughout the year to justify the ongoing expenditures of City funds. 5. Council direct staff to work with the Grand Terrace Lions' Club to determine the most critical improvements for the Community Center for the potential inclusion for funding in the next fiscal year budget. Mayor Matteson recessed City Council meeting at 8 10 p.m. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 8 25 p.m. 6B. City's Draft Housing Element - GP-89-01 Community Development Director Sawyer, reported that this Public Hearing is for consideration of the Draft Housing Element. He indicated that the document has been prepared by Wildan Associates to meet the requirements of California State law regarding the mandatory five-year revision of the City's Housing Element. He recommended that Council approve the Draft Housing Element for the purpose of submittal to the State Department of Housing and Urban Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 7 Development for their review and comment as required by Calffornia State Law. Al Warot, Wildan Associates, gave a slide presentation and an overview of the draft element. Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public. Stan Hargrave, 12048 Canary Ct., had concern that the figures used to prepare the draft element are outdated and require an unrealistic amount of low-income housing. He suggested that the City set their goals to maintain and upgrade the existing housing. Al Warot, Wildan Associates, suggested that if there is a commitment made to a figure, the figure is less than 50% of what SCAG is suggesting and is nowhere near the total number of additional units that could be built as layed out in Table 14. Jerry Irvy, 22738 Pico St., pointed out that the figures pertaining to the number of units per acre in some areas could not be accomplished. He felt that the City has a responsibility to address the needs of moderate or low income families in Grand Terrace. Community Development Director Sawyer, pointed out some corrections that should be made to the charts. Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council. Councilmember Pfennighausen, indicated that in the draft element stating that there demolition permits issued in Grand Terrace stating that there have been low-income demolished by the City. She indicated impressed with the document presented. City Attorney Harper, amended to indicate that units which would have income housing. suggested that the the City demolished, otherwise been low the statement has been no is misleading, housing units that she was statement be as unsafe, 41 and moderate CC-89-198 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Draft Housing Element with stated corrections for the purpose of submittal to the State Department of Housing and Urban Development for their review and comment as required by California State Law. Council Minutes - 10/26/89 Page 8 ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 10 00 p.m., until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held Thursday, November 9, 1989. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace. MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace. DATE NOVEMBER 3, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 9, 1989 SUBJECT ATTENDANCE AT THE 1989 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SEMINAR ,-�5 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The League of California Cities is holding its FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SEMINAR in Monterey, December 6 to 8. Attached is a copy of the program for this year. Staff is requesting Council authorize the attendance of the City Manager and Assistant Finance Director. Funds were budgeted in the current fiscal year for this expenditure. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER AND ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SEMINAR, DECEMBER 6-8, 1989. TS bm ma Attachments FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SEMINAR December 6-8, 1989 Hyatt Regency Monterey REVISED PRELIMINARY PROGRAM * - Denotes new or changed session Wednesday, December 6, 1989 11 00 am REGISTRATION OPENS — Foyer, Hyatt Conference Center 2 00 - 3 30 pm OPENING GENERAL SESSION State Legislative Report -- Dwight Stenbakken, Legislative Director, League of California Cities A run-down on major bills enacted in 1989 which affect municipal finance and a preview of 1990 issues Overview of Federal Issues Affecting City Finance -- Frank Shaffroth, Director of Federal Affairs, National League of Cities 3 30 - 3 45 pm BREAK 3 45 - 5 00 pm CONCURRENT SESSIONS I Working with Bond Rating Agencies This session will help cities understand how to approach bond rating agencies and how the agencies can enhance the city's economic strength * II Update on CCMA and GASB Activities, Implementation of GASB 3 (Cash and Investments) The Governmental Accounting Standards Board establishes accounting standards for governmental agencies throughout the country, and the California Committee on Municipal Accounting describes appropriate accounting procedures for California cities In Statement 3, GASB established standards for reporting cash and investments in financial statements This session will relate GASB 3 to specific practices in California and report on other current considerations of both organizations 5 30 - 6 30 pm HOSTED GET ACQUAINTED RECEPTION (Joint with Fire Chiefs and City Clerks) Thursday, December 7, 1989 9 00 - 10 15 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS * I Financing Options for Disaster Recovery This session will review methods and sources available to reconstruct city facilities following a disaster such as the Bay Area earthquake *II Cutting Costs and Generating Revenue This session will feature several strategies cities use to reduce costs and maximize revenue Topics will include business license taxes, DUI arrests, use of cred.t cards for city collections and low cost loans 10 15 - 10 30 am BREAK 10 30 - 11 45 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS I Fine and Forfeiture Revenues, Why Are They Diminishing and What Can Be Done About It This session will rdentify the reasons cities are receiving less revenue from this source and offer possible courses of action * II Compliance with Arbitrage Requirements Arbitrage regulations are out, but legislation may revise rebate provisions This session will provide practical information on what is requireo and how cities may comply Thursday, December 7, 1989 (Continued L 12 noon - 2 00 pm * GENERAL LUNCHEON AND DEPARTMENT BUSINESS SESSION Demographic and Cultural Changes in California The Economic Implications for Cities Richard Carlson, Spectrum Economics, Mountain View 2 15 - 3 45 pm GENERAL SESSION Ethics to Treasury and Financial Management Dennis Rose, Dennis Rose and Associates, Sacramento This session will include discussion of ethical dilemmas fiscal officers may face and ways to avoid Jeopardizing the integrity of your city or yourself 4 00 - 5 00 pm CRACKERBARREL SESSIONS The crackerbarrel sessions feature informal, group participation discussions on various topics Each session will include at least 2 resource people who are well-informed on the subject I Getting Your Share of State Reimbursements (There is real money appropriated for mandate reimbursements this year) II Maximizing Sales Tax Revenues * III Operating With A Two -Year Budget 5 30 - 6 30 pm NO -HOST RECEPTION (Joint with Fire Chiefs and City Clerks) Friday, December 8, 1989 9 00 - 10 15 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS * I Updating City Investment Policies CMTA, CSMFO and the County Treasurers Association have Just updated and reissued their Joint puDiication on investment policies This session will use the new report as the basis for a discussion of investment policies and investment management * II Financing City Facilities Through Fees and Exactions This session will provide a practical look at the use of fees and exactions under AB 1600, developer and annexation agreements, and assessment districts, with emphasis on preparing fiscal officers to play a role in policy decisions 10 15 - 10 30 am BREAK 10 30 - 12 00 noon CONCLUDING GENERAL SESSION Setting and Achieving Personal and Professional Goals Tim McDuffie, President, MCDuffle Investment Group, Newport Beach 12 00 noon ADJOURN 01- (jPii U)j Fr- IZIlACL P A I AND RECPL A I IUN MlVllv11 T I"EE Lncl l-le 1d I In UL I ,uc'r , 110 Il[Nllll^(i F I CCall _Lu q�_cJ� r E- OLLI Maio, Cnairm<an, ual lr_d LhP meeting LII I_Irderor- 7 OO 1) rn H embers Pruwu I ( D L (I Weals, Chairman NO L' M c'Lt c'nridge, Vl ( u ( hairm ar) 9YI - L<a Rublu<.. Lonny ly I I I M L Ca I by Le Iur nnde �TIE'rnL,r�Y �� Ab c n t Kitt But, Lt., f� r�'al IIf r,E )t I'�LIIIl1 C <y Hai ( i o johun C_'I 1, .r. V L 1 U Ltar V I L_t 1n (' I 4 Ab uo k a ) II ulI L(eY uL.'I Lei ( I JA 11 ] i n7- I hu `a IgEmbc l I AHn t uL, Wel u ..tppi I npd w1 a IIoU I � Ib ju'c a Lclr 01 cl Zil(1irlt_m (ZE'r rI� rll l III If Pt ViI_II_l�- i'lefnber (_ hc'airman Wools reported that rapprn priCate rvcI-IClrllLlI_In fGl Barbars? Conley wat. being prepared by the Ci Ly Clert and would be pres-niea at Ca-FI_(turu Council Meu'tiny4 :3cdl(d��-1GEfris.,_i�1(�ntlfl(�u_cJy—L11(�—C'��InrTllLl,eca rr,�nt k ar ell LO rbor r ep"rte,_ (It Yl _I,r1rnLL(u5r_ ror Pond, AHUhint_ ALruIdallU LI_I Il tnt1„ IOLM"OU all Me itumn wE'1 u now Larl f=ctucl" lhu t_Ommlr`t_E wc-a_ d 1 LL n L L 1 ied W1 Lh Lhc: Uenur al i Ly of Lho repor C i.,Il" M an WEEKS, a1OLUd uhal Lhu U"ff response cluE an Lhj1 ,ub)eA Wa= Lllmplf-'Lely nnsat,iniactory du- LII the W(Vrll II(UHUS "f SoMe "f Lht 1 tPMO 1 de t L r l nd 1)y 1 ht_' C IrrM7 I U( (3 III(_ L ommi t Lt c uiOLl(Lbod the graua an thu upper l ield et IerraL(' Hill Part Dick Rollins pruvidou a handuim Wflit_hi di. Ccu bus. wrclrs ('I(t NnW UtL 1 101 'the l.YPO Il Wrcawn or- Lhe r leld (h ar Fin Gerber (u pied and uisU ibl Lad ttli�-- inful ma Lion) I he biyyun I I_cscyr 01 Lh i. � 1 field LS Yow Lh 10((c_rn DILL RAIL Lllts_ suoLed Gnat 1I wuh 1=oUball had given up un I(S Lng LLIW fit-'l d �omu yews c- gn d"I t u Lhle PnIYJLh I11 Lh, gian= DIL1 Met, ..and 3athl Oirvau LIt ny- 111(' L° I II J-111(1 fI_I) t hO t)IIY [ If <,,r_tt Lt'l I stLll f w1 11 l�La> n0 11SL 01 00(((_1 111)I(r Las t_ PCr 1(-I u ed I_Iri this fit-'ld from the SOCLer Llub "Hd wit] give Lc to I<,ar( n flir di.t kribul,iw l LII MC-mbers and `31 _tl f HI 4 _ M1_I r t P1 I Lll a c _L_I_Immr_'rt t New_Eiosiness LL.nny added infu1 m"Lium hunt Lhe Grif fill / G1 t uiibol L, Lhat many wallL t <_Suu ihls Tiro used, Lhac 1L might, bu all art -a LhaL L--,ItILI be n-De'd 1`u1 -)CILCe1 t} 1 at 1 1 (_ C L. It wa, M/ a/C MAT POR 51 AF1 f'POVJ ICE H-lF COMI IITTI_L ON Ira REGULAR L-(ASI 3 WITH ALL RLPURT a 01 !NJUR r AT In P4P FACILKY icc!ii _I?r hlc�r ��m _I�ev_(l Iprn(�rl l be fur 1 ed du( to T� �ul d I Earl OLU Fh(_ re(unt L' ,purience t hca Li t y I If Redlands had With Leonagn at Lendi nco AL ..,t?'wi si plclnnod event` waq (11 cn-opd I here way- nI_Ifre di, agreement over Lho SULc-ows/nI_In-g"LLess of Leen dances spunsl_Ired by the City of Cu1 ttllrl Tr r_ yLy MCI repur L Muff wi l l t ! II1 t innu to "zi urr pt to qe t ,-in LUJ SON repreSEn Lativu LU me(_ t WILh I % COmmil UE 11r I e HrM unridyu rep Ir Lud Lhat, hu wuo Itnable LEI oumplet,w hin assig"meni- I In I h(, f)b jec t lves fu) G It1I III Jari�t4ary_ Llt_Ih��Liia�_D�aL� Ch airmalt Wools 1 eporLeu Lhat, LIii, d,iLL W a o III II II prt_0rit.lt'd WI t_111LEI and rC3( IIL-LI_(it- Llte meet 1 nq Ln nC(nr danM Wi Lh t .1 l y Pr! ICEt.Jitr0S Acl iun W P I '_ RE'V 1(°1.J I If L_,Ill 1'e'r�l• cani� �'�!„! I_Icat-LI i` Ali clt l .L'J1�,1L 5 1rtC� I � II(r clra__T_e_1 rhr_ea l P arfl'll ^Ml Lli_l �i L 41C''W plc_anS ful Lhe l uar LIE 1 e1 rwce with (.11L. C Immi L t eo I1! I.L mefnbert., ltt.kvu agreL-d Lo Volunteer un Dich Po Tins rc.pur Led Lh"t uho lei rac(• Vit. w Fail rliatTlund light u wt;,1 e being Krned IIn aL 0 0) p w Chairman Weul s reviewed the CI_Ifr mi L te- v ial_lgns L budget, r ppI Ir t No change from Fhe Jltly Report ALLE�rtL !r1 Y�IItLl1 FItl1(J UILI Pul.lino nil ud ub,ut LnL =tatLI_ts�I_11 LhL fund Chairman MuI s rep 11 Led that Member= Fruch/LI_Inle/ had Men aShed IJ/ Lhe CI_ImmLL1,00 (,I dC. t orminu Lhu Istal I_ts and 1 epI 11 t tu tht' ice! mmit LEe of ropurL was never made Dich anu Lonny will invostigafe tho MaLI_ts ttnd Ili cE wil I 1 cp,i t ban) tt Lhu N-1 ember meuLing. PRAGFN TNai0a Mno-mL,YL Hone? ne? " to 0 J Rc E of Lime Cathy Leogrande wi] ] visit Lhe C rNat,jvu DaMe Program and provide a December Repon OLher mumbcr<n, e' cept, MarLLa, selucted Programs Lu vi5i L at; Lunt m nth l u mew. Liiica Ali wi J J rep or r, on Lheir vi<sl L , in December 1__22-L n_ _ -- --- --- kenpW c r"l ly �cumi LLc�cl DLO WoLc6--c( F"ki I 'rn_CaGi r� [� �rnmi I Lc_c P4rAGEN TO. FROM DATE SUBJECT Planning Department City Council David Sawyer, Community Development Director November 9, 1989 Staff Report File No TTM-89-03 Request To subdivide a single parcel into seventeen single family lots (See Attachment A's Exhibit A) No funding required * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANT Emblem Development Corporation LOCATION 22738 Pico Street (APN # 277-181-003) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A negative declaration has been prepared for this project and is attached as Attachment A's Exhibit B ZONING AND LANDUSE- Property GP Zonin Land Use Subject Property LDR R1-7 2 Single Family Residence To the West LDR R1-72 Single Family Residence ty MN (/}4 22795 Barton Road 9 Grand Teiiace, California 92324-5295 0 (714) 824-6621 Property GP Zonin Land Use To the East LDR R1-7 2 Vacant To the North LDR R1-7 2 Single Family Residence To the South LDR R1-72 Single Family Residence BACKGROUND On September 20, 1989, the Planning Department accepted the applicant's application for a seventeen lot subdivision for the property located at 22738 Pico Street The subject property contains approximately 4 9 acres (211,266 sq ft ) and is presently developed with a single family residence DISCUSSION The tentative map proposes to subdivide the property into seventeen individual lots The existing single family residence will remain on Lot No Eight and all other existing structures will be removed The size of the lots range from 7,550 sq ft to 15,870 sq ft All of the lots meet the required minimum lot size requirement of 7,200 sq ft as well as lot dimensions and setback requirements REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS The following responses have been received from the City's Reviewing Agencies ENGINEERING/BUILDING & SAFETY The Engineering/Building & Safety Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated September 11 and September 25, 1989 and are attached as Attachment A's Exhibit C These comments address the issues of public improvements, grading and drainage facilities, and utility hookups FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT The Fire Department's comments are included in their memorandum dated September 5, 1989 and attached as Attachment A's Exhibit D COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The School District's comments are included in their memorandum dated Sepptember 1, 1989 and attached as Attachment A's Exhibit E RIVERSIDE -CORONA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT The Resource Conservation District's comments are included in the memoradum dated October 24, 1989 and attached as Attachment A's Exhibit F I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY The Edison Company's comments are included in their memorandum dated August 17, 1989 and attached as Attachment B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY The Gas Company's comments are included in their memorandum dated October 24, 1989 and attached as Attachment C PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The proposed subdivision includes a substantial slope which will face onto Oriole Avenue This slope is to be 30 feet in depth and approximately 10 feet in height Staff is concerned about the future maintenance of this slope and its impact on the adjacent neighborhood Staff feels that the maintenance of this slope should not be left up to the individual owners of lots 14 through 17 Instead, the rearyard fencing should be located at the top of the slope and the portions of the slopes be dedicated to the City for the purpose of inclusion into the City's Lighting and Landscaping District This will allow the City to provide the appropriate maintenance of the slope areas and assess the individual property owners of this subdivision for the cost of the required maintenance RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION At their regular meeting of October 16, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve TTM-89-03 and its associated negative declaration subject to the following conditions 1 The applicant shall submit each model of home for Site and Architectural Review Board approval and each individual home shall be constructed accordingly Subsequent minor changes in design features may be approved by the Planning Director 2 The subject property shall be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and Landscaping District 3 The area containing the proposed rearyard slope in Lots 14 through 17 shall be offered for dedication to the City for the purpose of inclusion in the City's Lighting and Landscaping District 4 If the area identified in Condition #3 is not included in the Lighting and Landscaping District then a Home Owner's Association shall be established and shall at a minimum be responsible for the maintenance of the rearyard slopes of Lots 14 through 17 inaccordance with the property maintenance standards of the City of Grand Terrace 5 All conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building & Safety in their memorandums dated September 11, and September 25, 1989, attached as Exhibit C, and 6 All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandum dated September 5, 1989, attached as Exhibit D, and 7 The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern ' California Edison easement 8 All conditions as recommended by the Colton Unified School District in their letter dated September 1, 1989, attached as Exhibit E, and 9 A Will Serve Letter will be needed from the Riverside Highland Water Department The Planning Commission also requested the City Engineer further evaluate the grading proposed for this subdivision for discussion purposes at the time of the City Council's hearing of this item The City Engineer has completed this evaluation and will be prepared to comment on such at the time of the meeting PLANNING DEPARTMENT IThe Planning Department recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving TTM-89-03 and its associated negative declaration subject to the conditions contained therein (See Attachment A) The conditions of approval contained in Attachment A are as recommended by the Planning Commission as well as three additional conditions being recommended at this time The additional conditions of approval are as follows 10 The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern California Gas Company Easement 11 All conditions as recommended by the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District in their memorandum dated October 24, 1989, attached as Exhibit F 12 Each individual lot shall be provided an individual curbside mailbox Clustered gangboxes shall not be allowed Respectfully submitted by David Sawyer Community Development Director 0 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TTM-89-03 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14471) AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ' WHEREAS, the Applicant, Emblem Development Corporation has applied for approval of a tentative tract map, (Exhibit A) subdividing 4 85 acres into 17 single family lots located at 22738 Pico Street (APN 277-181-03), and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council per the California Environmental Quality Act, and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 16, 1989, regarding this application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM-89-03 and its associated negative declaration subject to the conditions contained herein, and ' WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on November 9, 1989, regarding this application NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings have been made 1 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, 2 That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, 3 That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, 4 That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration, 5 That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan 6 That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations 5 ATTACHMENT A of the City of Grand Terrace, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, Califorma, that TTM-89-03 (Exhibit A) and the aforementioned Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) are hereby approved subject to the following conditions 1 The applicant shall submit each model of home for Site and Architectural Review Board approval and each individual home shall be constructed accordingly Additionally, the existing residence which is scheduled to remain shall also be subject to Site and Arclutectural Review Subsequent ' minor changes in design features may be approved by the Planning Director 2 The subject property shall be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and Landscaping District 3 The area containing the proposed rearyard slope in Lots 14 through 17 shall be offered for dedication to the City for the purpose of inclusion in the City's Lighting and Landscaping District 4 If the area identified in Condition #3 is not included in the Lighting and Landscaping District then a Home Owner's Association shall be established and shall at a minimum be responsible for the maintenance of the rearyard slopes of Lots 14 through 17 maccordance with the property maintenance standards of the City of Grand Terrace -' 5 Each individual lot shall be provided an individual curbside mailbox Clustered gangboxes shall not be allowed 6 All conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building & Safety in their memorandums dated September 11, and September 25, 1989, attached as Exhibit C 7 All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their memorandum dated September 5, 1989, attached as Exhibit D 8 All conditions as recommended by the Colton Unified School Distnct in their memorandum dated September 1, 1989, attached as Exhibit E 9 All conditions as recommended by the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District in their memorandum dated October 24, 1989, attached as Exhibit F 10 A Will Serve Letter shall be obtained from the Riverside Highland Water District 11 The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern California Edison easement 12 The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern California Gas Company Easement PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 9th day of November, 1989 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof I, JUANITA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Grand Terrace held on the 9th day of October, 1989, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper City Attorney 10 OF TERRFtC Planning C Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT `I l M-89-03, a tentative tract map subdividing 4 85 acres into 17 single family lots This property is located in the City's R1-7 2 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation (see attached map) APPLICANT Emblem Development Corporation/Jerry and Susan Irby LOCATION 22738 Pico Street (APN# 277-181-03) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment ,s— 5-�2-85 David Sawyer, Date Community Develop4ent Director City of Grand Terrace g EXHIBIT B 22795 Barton Road 0 Grand Tcrtace California 92324-5295 • (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1 Name of Proponent City of Grand Terrace - 2 Address and Phone Number of Proponent City of Grand 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 9232LI-5295 Attention David Sawyer, Planning Director Terrace 3 Date of Environmental Assessment 4 Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5 Name of Proposal, if applicable 1 TjA-09j - 03 6 Location of Proposal S_rVEE j C�P,4��-�a�-o3� II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets ) Yes Maybe No 1 Earth Will the proposal result in a Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? c Substantial change in topography or / ground surface relief features? d The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? ' e Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Q I 1 a 2 3 Yes Maybe No f Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, / inlet or lake? g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Air Will the proposal result in a Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b The creation of objectionable odors? — c Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in / climate, whether locally or regionally? Water Will the proposal result in a Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters b Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff' c Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters d Change in the amount of surface water in any water body e Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f Altei ation of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? 4 0 Yes Maybe No g Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations h Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? — i Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? V/ Plant Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, / crops, and aquatic plants)? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species / of plants? c Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- / ment of existing species? d Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life Will the proposal result in a Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? �V/ b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anirnals� c Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat' 6 7 9 M Yes Maybe No Noise Will the proposal result in a Increases J in existing noise levels? b Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glar e7 Land Use Will the proposal result in a suhstantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal Natural Resources Will the proposal result in a Substantial increase in the rate of use / of any natural resources7 ti/ b Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset Will the proposal involve a A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event / of an accident or upset conditions' J b Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency / _evacuation plan? Population Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth / rate of the human population of an area? J Housing Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing Transportation/Circulation Will the pro - proposal result in a Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement 14 15 IC Yes Maybe No b Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new 1:)arl<ing7 c Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people / and/or goods? V e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f Increase in traffic hazards to motor / vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas Fire a protection? b Police protection? c Schools7 d Parks or other recreational face- lities7 e Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f Other governmental services? Energy Will the proposal result in a Use of substantial amounts of fuel / or energy? b Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? — Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities a Power or natural gas? 13 ID Communications systems? c Water r d Sewer o,r septic tanks? e Storm water drainage? f Solid waste and disposal? 17 Human Health Will the proposal result in a Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18 Aesthetics Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19 Recreation Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20 Cultural Resources a Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site? b Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Yes Maybe No/ -- V -- 7 - V7' -- V/ Yes Maybe No d Will the proposal rests ict existing religious or sacred uses within the J potential impact areal V/ 21 Mandatory Findings of Significance a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pr ehistory? b Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts / will endure well into the future ) c Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant ) V/ d Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indii ectly? IS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NECATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared --7-/ I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL_ IMPACT REPORT is required -�2 ,G l Date David Sawyer Planning D-w-e-c-tor �ignature i For City of Grand Terrace �Le III DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1 b, 3 b The development of this predominantly vacant site will result in the over covering of a certain percentage of the soil This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering ' Department 6 a The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the development of residential uses in an area that is predominantly vacant This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan and enforced through the City's Noise Ordinance 8 The existing landuse will change from predominantly vacant land to single family residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan 1� 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace C, nia 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Barbara Pfennighausen Jim Singley Gene Carlstrom Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager W 0 12-1 1057 M E M O R A N D U M TO David Sawyer, Community Development Director FROM Joseph Kicak, City Engineer 4 v' DATE September 11, 1989 SUBJECT Tentative Tract No 14471 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for subject tract 1 Pico Street (a) Dedicate to provide for 33 foot half —street right—of—way (b) Install curb and gutter 22 feet from street centerline (c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline (structural section to support TI=7) 2 Oriole Avenue (a) Dedicate to provide for 30 foot half —street right—of—way (b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline (c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and streeE centerline (structural section to support TI=7) 3 Street "A" (a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right—of—way w: additional dedication as may be required for standard knucl._e and cul—de—sac (b) Construct curb and gutter at 18 feet from street centerline and in accordance with standard drawings for cul—de—sac a--c knuckle (c) Construct standard roadway between curbs (standard section co support TI=7) 4 Construct standard sidewalk along the frontages of all parcels 5 Install ornamental street lights 6 Provide adequate drainage facilities )R x 1989 EXHIBIT C Memorandum to David Sawyer Septembei 11, 1989 Page 2 7 Pay—off any existing bonds on said parcels or make necessary arrangement for segregation of assessments through San Bernardino County Special District ' 8 Pay sewer frontage fees along the frontage of Pico Street 9 Install sanitary sewer to serve all parcels 10 All utilities shall be installed underground 11 All driveways shall be constructed in accordance with the City Standards 12 Grading Plan shall be prepared for the proposed development, showing all of the proposed retaining walls, horizontal, vertical and structural details 13 All improvements shall be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City I 14 All of the improvements required above shall be installed or the installation thereof shall be secured prior to the approval of the final map 19 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace C, Vnia 92324-5295 Civic Center (714) 824-6621 Byron R Matteson Mayor Hugh J Grant Mayor Pro Tempore Barbara Pfennighausen Jim Singley -' Gene Carlstrom Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager W 0 12-1 1057 M E M O R A N D U M TO David Sawyer, Community Development Director FROM Joseph Kicak, City Enginee;r DATE September 25, 1989 SUBJECT Tentative Tract Map 14471 (89-3) I reviewed the revised map as submitted It appears that grading is proposed within the 30 foot wide SCE easement Such grading would be subject to approval of SCE 20 FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMEM COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 385 No Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415 0186 �: •. �nx r 1�r` ■may �` Yti,{(�+,'Sf�y L'�+g*�`�F=` a` cyv�y�U-itr".5... �7 (• tIU�JR I"Wr A N *t , . .. > De: sk lY . .,:u!1� i�i1 SHERIFF' ` } DATE TO FRi ' SUBJECT SEPTEMBER 5, 1989 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Planning Dept DAVID J DRISLOLL, Chief County Fire Warden RFF E'RENCE NO 71M 89-03 APN FIRE PROTLC'TION REQUIRE ENTb CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT r � c 1C Olnrr .. tU IL IXI Fl The above referenced project is protected by the Forestry �' S 3F001 & Fire Warden Dept Piior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements IXI F2 All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the 5FO02 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No 106), Development Code, } Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, tules and regulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California t J ' IX F3 The street address shall be posted with a minimum of three (3) 5FUU inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernarctino County Ordinance No 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street cr IXI F4. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any 5FOO4 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be mdint- ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire Code IXI F5 All flammdble �iegetation shall be removed from each building 3F005 site d minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure I I F6 The development and each phase thereof shall have two points 1F006 of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code IXI F7 Private roadways which exceed one-hLu-idred and fifty (150) in 1F007 length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the extei.ior walls of the first story of any building An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) Where (1) r EXHIBIT D the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department 1XI F8 A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 1F008 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Code F9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading Us - and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction 1XI F10 All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow 1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water The following are minimum requirements for your proposed development A System Standards ' Fire Flow 1250 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with sprinklered building Duration 2 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 600 Feet between hydrants *If blank, flaw to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received B Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C Fire Hydrants Numbers 3 Total Type 6 Inch w/ 1 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate 1XI F11 The required fire flaw shall be determined by appropriate cal- 1FU11 (2) :.�Z culations, using the 1974 editin of the lnsurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow " I I F12 In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection 3F012 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No 12.31, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting" A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel, the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department 1> F13 The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department 11__., with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation F14 Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino 3F014 County Ordinance No 2475 shall be strictly enforced I I F15 A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required Req- 1F015 uirements will be site specific to the project The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction prior to recordation of the final map Maintenance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department Questions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning Sc--,on, County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, lst Floor, San Bernard- ir, California, 92415-0186, or call 714-387-4225 Thank you for your coopera- tion Sincerely, BY NANC'Y BEST Fire Protection Planning Inspector cc Riverside -Highland Water Emblem Batt 7 file The following are 1 1 Non -Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments -2-3 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, California 92324-1798 (714)876-4227 ��w�� S RECT IS E l u Ij 1989 September 1, 1989 MRS DORTHA E COOLEY Mr David Sawyer President Community Development Director MRS WENDYS CURRAN City of Grand Terrace Vice President 22795 Barton Road MR RAY ABRIL JR Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Clerk MRS RUTH O HARRIS SUBJECT Tentative Tract 14471 MR ARLIE R HUBBARD MRS PATRICIA I NIX Dear Mr Sawyer MRS PHYLLISV ZIMMERMAN The Colton Joint Unified School District is impacted at the present time. As a result the school district assesses a fee of $1 56 per square foot on new residential construction ADMINISTRATION The fees are payable prior to issuance of building permits While the District remains concerned as to the affect of MR RUSSELLI DICKINSON additional residential development on schools within Grand Superintendent Terrace, the District has no objection to the project if the MR CHARLESH JORDAN required assessment is met Assistant Superintendent Personnel Sincerely, MR ROBERT W MURPHY �J Assistant Superintendent Business MISS NANCYA NORTON Greg G Gage Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction Coordinator, School Facilities MR DANNY CARRASCO Director Administrative Services GGG sl MRS BONNIE RUSSELL HUNT Director Pupil Personnel Services z� EXHIBIT E Joining Together to Go the Extra Mlle `pRp 9 r � � U ap ir p�C0NSER`1 P1\0 � 2s RECT 0 CT 1 5 1989 Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District 2023 CHICAGOAVENUE, B14 *RIVE RSIDE,CALIFORNIA92507 *PH ONE (714) 683 7691 10-24-89 Dear Mr Sawyer We acknowledge receipt of the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for TTM-89-03 22738 Pico StrPPf- in Riverside County, California that was addressed to the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District on 10-24-89 for review and comment We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and find that 1 There are no controversial items in the report within the realm of the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities a We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or flooding within the project area b There is no Prime, State, Unique or Locally Important Farmland involved in the project area c We find no conflict with any SCS on -going or planned programs or projects (2'1� We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by vour ,r committee 1 Earth part e any earth movement depending on time of year will have an effect on erosion by wind and water It is felt a erosion control plan should be included in the overall plan We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project Sincerely Stanley Cooley Directer l V� 4Jt I089 EXHIBIT F I J Southern California Edison Company P O BOX 410 100 LONG BFACH BOULEVARD LONG BEACIA CALIFORNIA 90801 %I —TERN H G10Iq 1 ANU gERVICEc; D SION REAL PROPCRTICS AND A0111N S—R/ TI%F SER%1CLS Honorable City Council City of Grand Terrace L 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Council Members SUBJECT Ten�-a+-i ve Tract Map No 14471 % TE1 LI HOn- / 12 3 91 2-16 AUG 2 21989 FAX 1213 ,s, 2076 August 17, 1989 Our review of the subject subdivision map reveals that the proposed development will interfere with our rights within the subdivision boundaries Until such time as arrangements have been made with the developer to eliminate this interference, the development of the subdivision will unreasonabl1T interfere with the complete and free exercise of Edison's rights If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Dennis Bazant at (213) 491-2644 19921(3)pmh cc Irby, Langone & Associates R C Warren/A J Lee W S Franken W L McClanahan R C Schaefer Area Manager 2 (� Very truly yours, S R SHERMOEN Regional Manager DENNIS BAZA/N Real Properties Agent ATTACHMENT B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA f�. as c�JMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE REDLANDS CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS P O BOX 3003 REDLANDS CALIFORNIA 92373 0306 October 24., 1989 City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California y2324-5295 SUBJECT 22738 Pico Street The division and development of the property as Shown on 22738 Pico Street will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise ct any easements held by bouthein California Gas Company within the boundaries of said project, providing ire are able to maintain our easements as recorded This Company has no objection to the recordation of said project, providing the following conditions for construction over our easements are met 1 No change of grade without prior written approval of Southern California Gas Company 2 No permanent structures within the easements, i e buildings, concrete pads, block walls, etc should the Gas Company have to remove any temporary structures over our easements, the re -installation would be clone at the property owner's expen,e 3 No planting of trees or deep rooted plants withoa- written approval from Southern California I,as Company 4 No poles, signs, or fence posts to be installed without written approval from Southern California Gas Company 5 Ingress and egress rights to and From the pipeline must be maintained This letter should not be construed as a subordination of this Company s rights, title and interest in and to said easements, nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement If you have any questions, please contact our Right of Way Department at (714) 335-7733 KS mac Enc -Right of Slay Plat Ken Soverns Technical bupervisor ATTACHMENT C r- SECTION TOWNSHIP HAHGE 9 II X 4- 2 S d w S S so IS ul J a- �F CD r r J V 0 a i i 0 co M rn — •9 - O N m P1Co So LlNr oG NE1ld_ Sw 114 Sac. 4- Q 0) F, co 301 ID FEE j Ee 2Y 1J' I IC P �/ 7 S U S Ca h1 O 1 p F- SEc�Iz1-TY PL>LtF 1L N1ATIortAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PUT ACCOXPAXYHNG APPLICATIOX FOR PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY I3 I IH WIDTH 6CALE IN `; e=, �I ? -1 _t� 1 �`.fJ 1 �: p C.O I� _ �� G Q, T E Q2AG E� A. s DRWX LHKD DATE - - APPROVED // CATAINED rr''� DRO x0 r- — 1 j D44 4 C' - ? ^ izae ,.- • DATE Nov 1, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Nov 9, 1989 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AT 11830 MT VERNON AVE '(5 ---------------------------------------------------------------- FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the Council Meeting of September 14, 1989, Council considered the potential of frontage improvements at 11830 Mt Vernon Ave between the two adjacent Forest City Dillon developments The ' previous staff report is attached Council in their consideration directed staff to make contact with Forest City Dillon and determine if there is any interest on their behalf to participate in the expense of the proposed improvements They have indicated that at this time they were not in a position to fund any portion of the improvements STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF FUNDING FOR THE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN APPROXIMATE COST OF $30,000 to $40,000 A FINAL COST WOULD BE DETERMINED AT AWARD OF BID, SHOULD THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TS bt MUMML -AGENDA ITT 2 7,q- DATE _ S e p t_ 8_,. __Lc 4 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Sept 14, 1989 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF DEDICATION -- 11830 Mt Vernon Ave �5 ------------------------------------ FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the City Council Meeting of May 5, 1989, Council considered accepting dedication at 11830 Mt Vernon Ave in consideration for frontage improvements Staff was directed to report in more detail the engineering cost estimate for the potential improve- ments At that time three alternatives were presented 1 The full improvements of the right-of-way to include curb/ gutter/sidewalk and landscaping 2 Potential improvements which include paving to the ultimate paving width with no curb/gutter/sidewalk 3 To do no improvements The City Engineer has prepared a detailed estimate of the proposed costs There was some questions, initially, regarding the retaining wall That item can be eliminated if the property owner allows the City a temporary easement to provide grading, which will eliminate the need for the wall The full improvements are estimated to be $37,404 25, the partial improvements would be at a cost of $15,162 50 In discussions with Dr McDuffee there is not complete agreement in the area of potential earth work, the need for two street lights rather than one, and he indicated that he would relocate item no 17 at his own cost which would save an additional $150 Even considering the potential negotiability of these items, the cost for the total improvements would be between $30,000 and $37,000 A final figure could not be determined until the Citv actually went out to bid If it is the desire of the Council to consider the improvements, the final cost could only be determined with the award of the bid which also would require -2- Council action Dr McDuffee has indicated that he would only - dedicate right-of-way for the grading improvements and would not accept alternative no 2 to allow any temporary grading to be done on his private property This leaves the Council with alternatives 1 and 3 consider STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL CONSIDER ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF THE -RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS TS bt Attachment PLEASE NOTE Refer to your July 13, 1989 packet for the map outlining the improvements L(-L2,AIE A'___ Iv`tihUN 3TREET IhPROUEhENTS 08 1_STI`iATE FILE hT VLRNON uATE 7/ 5/09 TIME 9 4 54 ITEM DESCRIPTION a LEAPING AND GRU8BIPIG - _ __ kARIHWORK (+00 Cy IMPORT MATERIAL) ----- 3 a CURB AND GUTTER - - - - - _ ______ + UAWIAULE HCIGHT CURB b GUTTER---------- 5 C C SIDEWALK - - - - - - -- __ _ b C C DRIVEWAY - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 CATCH BASIN (,J = -4, ) - - - ____ _____ 0 .JUNCTION STRUCTURE - -- -------__------_-- y R8 ' R C P ( D-1500 ) - - - -- __ _ __ 10 'A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2' THICK-------_-_-_- 11 G' CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE 12 -)APIAbLE THICKOESS A C OVERLAY -- ----- 13 FOG SEAL ----------__ _ ____ _ ___ 14 -3AWLUT ANO REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM - I5 REMOVE A C PAVEMENT ----- _ __ 16 RLLOCATL WATER METER ------------------- 11 RELOCATE HOSE BIBB - __ _ ILLOCAIL 4' WI"E & POST FENCE-------_-- 19 TREE REMOVAL ----------- -- - - d0 :JRNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS - - - - - - '-1 IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING - - - - - - _ - - - - - - QUANTITY 1 00 L S 9 400 o0 C Y 9 308 00 L F 9 13 50 L F Q 1,621 00 S F 9 312 o0 S F Q 1 00 L S Q 1 00 L S 9 34 00 L F 9 45 00 TONS 9 100 00 TONS C? 50 00 TONS Q 840 00 S Y 9 325 00 L F Q 300 00 S F (3 1 00 EA 9 2 00 EA 180 00 L F 9 5 00 EA 9 2 00 EA Q 1 00 LS Q - __CIFiI��-__ PRICE 1,500 00 • 5 00 = 10 00 = 12 00 = 2 75 • 3 5 0 �• 2,500 00 = 2,00o 00 = 45 00 = 85 00 = 25 00 = 85 00 0 50 = 1 50 - 1 00 = 250 00 = 75 00 = 5 00 400 00 = 750 00 2,500 00 = TOTAL JOB ESTIMATE - TOTAL PRICE t 1,300 = 2,000 t 3,080 C t 162 f +,457 i t 1 092 C t 2 500 C t 2,000 0 3 1,590 0 f 3,825 0 t 2,500 0 f + 250 0 t 420 Oi S 487 5i # 300 O( 3 250 0( t 150 0( $ 900 0( S 2 000 OC S 1,500 O( S 2,500 ------------- OC S 37 +04 25 VLIt�ON 01REET IMPROVEMENTS 10 ESTIMATE FILE 12 421B UA1E 7/ 5/09 TIME 9 8 43 TEM DESCRIPTION 1 �LEARING AND GRUBBING ------------------ 2 ARTHWORK (50 Cy IMPORT MATERIAL) ------ 3 A C PAVEMENT 2 1/2" THICK------------- 4 b" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE ------------ 5 VARIABLE THICKNESS A C OVERLAY-------- 6 FOG SEAL ------------------------------- 7 SAWCUT 6 REMOVE ROLLED A C BERM------- 0 REMOVE A C PAVEMENT ------------------- 9 RELOCATE 4' WIRE 6 POST FENCE---------- 10 A C ORIVEWAY APPROACH ------- --------_ -- --- —, -- - -- -- UNIT ^ - QUANTITY PRICE 1 00 L 8 Q 2,000 00 �• 50 00 C Y Q 3 00 = 45 00 TONS Q 83 00 x 100 00 TONS Q 25 00 = 50 00 TONS Q 83 00 = 840 00 S Y Q 0 50 = 325 00 L F 4 1 50 = 200 00 S F 9 1 00 = 180 00 L F Q 5 00 = 220 00 S F 2 1 50 �• TOTAL JOB ESTIMATE _ TOTAL PRICE % 2,000 0( f 230 Oi 3,825 O( t 2,500 0( 4,250 OC % 420 O( # 487 5C 1 200 OC f 900 OC E 330 OC $ 15,162 5C CRA ITEM ( ) SUBJECT DATE Nov. 2, 1989 S T A F F R E P O R T COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE Nov. 9, 1989 RENEWAL OF FIRE STATION LEASE -17 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The current lease between the City of Grand Terrace and the County of San Bernardino Forestry and Fire Department has expired, and staff is negotiating a new contract. Approximately six years ago, prior to the construction of the existing Fire Station on City Center Court, the County occupied a ' modular Fire Station facility at a similar location closer to Mt. Vernon Ave. The City of Grand Terrace receives fire protection as a result of being included in the County Service Area (CSA) 38. The City does not directly have to provide fire services and only a small portion of our budget is used in maintaining the Fire Station. Currently, the amount of money generated within the incorporated City of Grand Terrace for Zone 38 is approximately $55,000. The expenses incurred directly by CSA 38, as outlined on the attached fact sheet, is approximately $384,000, not including departmental overhead. The shortfall is covered by a combination of revenues generated by CSA 38 outside of our boundaries as well as County augmentation funding. The City charges the County, which then charges CSA 38, $500 per month for the rental of the Fire Station. In negotiations with County Fire Chief Driscoll, he is requesting the City waive the monthly rental fee which would allow CSA 38 to utilize those funds for operations. Grand Terrace is in a unique position to belong to CSA 38 and receive complete fire protection. In order to induce CSA 38 to continue to operate out of the City -owned Fire Station staff recommends the annual rental fee of the Fire Station facility be set at $1. STAFF RECOMMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE ATTACHED LEASE WITH COUNTY SERVICE AREA 38. T S b t MIMM AGENDA ITEM 4 <3,4 FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT 3800 Sierra Way • San Bernardino, CA 92405-2399 (714) 882 1226 October 30, 1989 ' City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Attn Tom Schwab, Manager Dear Tom COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY FLOYD TIDWELL Director EMERGENCY SERVICES Attached is the Fact Sheet on CSA 38 Expenses for Grand Terrace I,ire Station SDAF on the Revenue Fact Sheet refers to Special Districts Augmentation Fund ty hL ro lie o a RoYott r t 5 Cl y of C C)t Nleci { o-:) )er Relating to liability, the language difference on the new lease is per instructions r i from County Counsel -< Please direct any questions or concerns to me "' Best regards, DAVID J DRISCOLL County Fire Warden DJD/JPT jas Attachment qhl ((. t)E C-)H " t t Mount" N ti Spr,n , tia iCuF, OF GRaND T0.11RA E venm evvvm COUNTY SERVICE AREA 38 BUDGET 1989/90 F Y GRAND TERRACE FIRE STATION 1 Permanent Firefighter Personnel, Salaries & Benefits $343,097 41 2 Paid Call Volunteer Firefighter Salaries & Benefits 16,435 3 Operational Expenses for Fire Station & Equipment $24,004 TOTAL $383,536 NOT INCLUDED Chief Officer Administration & Emergency Incident Coverage Fire Prevention Staff Activities Training Staff Activities Support Services Personnel, Finance, Automotive, Service Center, Fire Protection Planning and Engineering & Dispatching C FACT SHEET COUNTY SERVICE AREA REVENUE FOR GRAND TERRACE 1988-89 Tax Rate Book A.V. - R.D.A. - A V. - Revenue CSA 38 SDAF NET SDAF $292,255,374 <$154,985,215> $137,270,159 NET $54,084 < $ 2 6 , 0 7 9 > $28,005 $21,056 ALLOCATION $49,061 CSA 38 Zone G SDAF NET SDAF ($49,061 + $5,458) _ $54,519 $29,197 < $ 2 6 , 0 8 2 > $ 3,115 $ 2,343 ALLOCATION $ 5,458 Y� �cirs v if m `�L ,�� s