The URL can be used to link to this page

11/21/1985CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING UA(T,R. . ' COPY AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order Invocation - Pastor Ray Williams, Grand View Baptist Church * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call A COMMUNITY POTLUCK DINNER WILL BEGIN AT 5 30 P M. Staff IN 1HE CIVIC CENTER COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM COMMEM- Recommendations ORATING THE CITY'S 7TH BIRTHDAY - PUBLIC INVITED F---- CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 6 15 P M 1. Approval of Minutes (11/7/85) Approve 2 Approval of Check Register No. CRA1121_85 Approve DJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY )NVENE CITY COUNCIL Items to Add/Delete SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A Awards to Crime Prevention Poster/Essay Contest Winners Grand Terrace Elementary Poster Contest Jonathan Hansen First Place Sean Bergen Second Place Jennifer Miescher Third Place Terrace View Elementary Poster Contest Roger Orton First ace Mandy Minicacci Second Place Scott Nuskin Third Place Terrace Hills Junior High Essay Contest Gevina Parra First Place Jennifer Prais Second Place Toni Joslin Third Place San Bernardino County Resolution Proclaiming November 21, 1985 as "Great American Smokeout Day" - (Barbara Riordan, Supervisor, Third District) NOVEMBER 21, 1985 6 15 P.M Council Action PLFASE DO idOT RFOOVE COUNTER COPY �eFROH INFORMATION COMITER., THANK YOW, i. A COUNCIL AGENDA 11/21/85 - Page 2 of 3 L Staf Recommendations Council Action C. Commemorative City Plaques to Past Councilmembers Thomas T Tillinghast (Charter Member) Jack Allen (Charter Member) r Doug Erway (Charter Member) Roy W Nix Jim Rigley Kelly Arizaga - Designer of the City Logo D Certificate of Service - Bill DeBenedet E. Sister City Update Report - Bill DeBenedet F City Gateway Entrance Signs, Dave TerBest, Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce 3 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register No. 112185 1 Approve B Ratify 11/21/85 CRA Action I Approve C. Approve 11/7/85 Minutes Approve D. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda Approve E. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY1 Adopt OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. F. Approve and Accept the Investment Policy Set I Approve Forth by the City Treasurer G. Civic Center Refinancing A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, MAKING DESIG- NATIONS INCIDENT TO REFUNDING CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION (Civic Center Project) B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR REFUNDING CERTIF- ICATES OF PARTICIPATION (Civic Center Project) V COUNCIL AGENDA - Staft- 11/21/85 - Page 3 of 3 Recommendations I4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 15 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - 7 30 P.M A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Also consider adop- OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, DEALING WITH NOISE & ting 1st reading of DECLARING THE EMISSION OF CERTAIN NOISES TO alternative Ordin- BE A NUISANCE (2nd Reading) ance submitted 16 ORAL REPORTS A Planning Commission B Parks & Recreation Committee (1) Consider appointing Barbara M Conley to fill the unexpired term of Gary Dishaw to expire June 30, 1986 C Historical & Cultural Activities Committee D Crime Prevention Committee E. Emergency Operations Committee F Economic Development Adhoc Committee G Police Chief H Fire Chief I City Engineer J. City Attorney K. City Manager L City Council 7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Tract 11450 - Roy C. Roberts 8 NEW BUSINESS A. Traffic Signals - Barton Rd /Mt. Vernon B. Street Lighting (1) Street Lights - Barton Rd & Mt Vernon (2) 1972 Landscape & Street Lighting Act Report 9 Closed Session ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1985, AT 5 30 P M AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 12/12/85 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12 00 NOON ON 12/4/85. Council Action ti lovember 21, 1985 P E N D I N G C R A A P P R O V A L CPA AGENDA ITEM # 1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 1985 The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 7, 1985, at 5 34 p.m. PRESENT Hugh J Grant, Chairman Byron Matteson, Vice Chairman Tony Petta Barbara Pfennighausen Dennis L. Evans Seth Armstead, Executive Director Thomas J Schwab, Treasurer Ivan Hopkins, Attorney Ilene Dughman, Secretary ABSENT- None APPROVAL OF MINUTES (10/17/85) CRA-85-54 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Mr. Petta, ALL AYES, to approve the Minutes of October 17, 1985, with the following amendments (1) Economic Development Adhoc Committee Member Appointment Motion No. CRA-85-52 to reflect "Second by Chairman Grant", (2) Mr. Petta's late arrival to be reflected as an authorized absence for the purpose of attending a conference in Lake Arrowhead in behalf of Chairman Grant. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA102485 CRA-85-55 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Chairman Grant, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No CRA102485, as presented. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA110785 CRA-85-56 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Councilman Petta, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. CRA110785, as presented. RESOLUTION NO CRA-85-02 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, OF INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING PROJECT Page 1 - CRA - (11/7/85) i il George McFarlin, representing Nazarek, Harper, Hopkins & McFarlin, advised the Resolution provides for the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds to provide financing for a multifamily rental housing project originally proposed by McMillin Development, Inc and recently acquired (in escrow) by Forest City Dillon, Inc., which, if approved, would permit them to recover any costs incurred from this point on out of the Bond Issue, this transaction is hoped to be consummated in the year 1985 due to the uncertainty in the new Federal Tax Law currently being negotiated in Congress. In response to Vice Chairman Matteson, Mr. McFarlin clarified that 201%, of the units are required by Federal Law to be rented to low income families, no specific provision included for senior citizens, further stated the City would incur no liability for the repayment of these obligations and that an administrative fee would be paid to the City for processing this transaction. CRA-85-57 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Mrs. Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to adopt Resolution No. CRA-85-02 Adjourned at 5 48 p.m. The regularly scheduled meeting for November 14,198has been cancelled, the next regular CRA meeting will be held Thursday, November 21, 1985, at 6 15 p.m. preceded by an Annual Potlock Dinner at 5 30 p.m. commemorating the City's 7th Birthday. Page 2 - CRA - (11/7/85) Respectfully submitted, Secretary APPROVED airman I P E N D I N G C R A A P P R O V A L COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOV 21. 1985 November 21, 1985 CRA Agenda Item # 2 CHECK REGISTER NO CRA112185 CHECK NUMBER OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF NOV 21, 1985 (1) RA1560 (2) RA1561 (3) RA1562 (4) RA1563 (5) RA1564 (6) RA1565 (7) RA1566 HUGH GRANT BYRON MATTESON ANTHONY PETTA BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN DENNIS EVANS HEALTHNET INSURANCE SIMONIS MORELAND ACCOUNTANTS AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE, NOV 1985 AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE, NOV 1985 AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE, NOV 1985 AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE, NOV 1985 AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE, NOV 1985 HEALTH INSURANCE FOR PETTA, DEC 1985 ANNUAL AUDIT FOR F/Y 1984/1985 TOTAL $ 150 00 150 00 127 23 150 00 150 00 22 77 2,900 00 $3,650 00 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR THE PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA � — THOMAS SCHWAB // TREASURER E N D I NG C0UNl, 1 L Nrrnuv rAL- - I - - �•__ P Council Aqenda Iteri,#E3A1 CITY OF GRANO TERRACE VOCHREGR VOUCHER/WARRANT REGISTER CHECK REGISTER NO 112185 DATE 11/14/85 --- ITEM - -- - - ITEM- --- - ---- RARRAN VQUCfi£R7--VEiVQQR---VENDO WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT L'.S.C:CONF:9/2IiSCHw-AB-- --`- Z1.QO-- ------ - - SCJPA MEET.9/19,SCHWAB 28.50 i LCC CONF.10/6,SCHWAB 138.00 187.50 P4417 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION REG.BIA MEET.B.P.10/29 15.00 15.00 P4�tg--tr M1=R-IF€--F-tGYD-TIDWE-tt-------L'AW ENFORCE SVCS.t,9-/8 -37,-79�0 T;798.00`- - P4433 2169 BETH A. DUARTE STUFF SEWER BILLING 11/85 98.00 98 00 P4434 4347 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REG.ELECTION MEET.ILENE 100.00 100.00 -1344495 MUN-1C-i-P-AL-hFANAG EhEI+T-AS-4IT- REG.MMASC-MEET.-sE-T H -12.00---- 12.00 P4436 4634 MAIN LINE EMBOSSING BUS.CARDS,CITY CLERK 28.62 28.62 - P4437 6629 SECURITY PACIFIC NAT.BANK LCC75AN FRAN.000NCIL 19196.53 LCC,SAN FRAN.SCHWAB 361.92 LAKE-ARROWHEADT�ETH 18r79 --' CREDIT,AIR FARES/F 177.00- CREDIT,AIR FARES/F 118.00- 19282.24 P4438 6782 STATE COMPENSATION INS.FUND WORKERS COMP.INS.10/85 534.42 534.42 -P4f-4 UO-Y-eEB-lYttfl R-/R-FORMPC1t�cyC tT.86 -- I7-8 P4441 1745 CITY/COUNTY PLANNING REG.CONF.MUNSON 16.00 16.00 P4442 6605 SCANNER WORLD, U.S.A. REGENCY CHANNEL SCANNER 406.99 PROGRAMABLE SCANNER 165.44 " 2 -Y P- E-X T E N T E D-W-A -.00 2 5 . 00 5 9--V.-4 3--- --- �RA1560 2950 HUGH GRANT GRANT,NOV.1985 150.00 150 00 RA1561 A658 BYRON MATTESON MATTESON9NOV.1985 150.00 150.00 ---- - - -PETTA,NOV-T985 127:23- 1-7-23 RA,156Z---5565---ANTHONY-P-E-TTfk------- RA1563 5576 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN -- --- - PFENNIGHAUSEN,NOV.1985 _- -_ - -- 150.00 150.00- RA1564 2278 DENNIS L. EVANS EVAN59NOV.1985 150.00 150.00 RA-1565 3 H€AtTM--N€T --` - -HEALTH- INS .PETTA-D€C.198-5 --22%77- - ---22-;-77 -- RA1566 6662 SIMONIS MORELAND ACCOUNTANTS AUDIT 84/85 29900.00 29900.00 15209 VAN DELL E ASSOCIATES,INC. PLANNING SEMINAR 186.50 PLANNING SEMINAR 186 50 373.00 15210 LERAY JONES - W W.0 REFUND.JONES 3.50 3 50 --- 15Z11- --- -- ---- SUSAN REGISTER ----- W.W.O REFUNDfRECISTER - -- --------- ----7.00------`-- "' 7 00 0 VOC►+RE(,R- CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 2 DATE 11/14/85 VOUCHER/WARRANT REGISTER VBUC-HER-/ VEND0R VE-NDE) --1TEM --- ITEM-' ------- -- WARRAN WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT - 1521-2--z927 AEEURATE JANITORIAL --SERVICES- -CLEAN- CARPET ;3--OPP-ICC-3-C-/C----`-155.OQ-- 15213 1166 RANDALL ANSTINE CODE ENFORCE.SEM. 54.00 --Ll0CAL7-MI-t[-"e-vANS-T-IffE &TT5 62775�" 15214 1170 ANY HOUR LOCK 6 KEY FIX DOOR/R-RgPARK 159.53 159.53 15215 1210 SETH ARMSTEAD LAKE ARROWHEAD CONF.SETH 47.50 MEET.COLTON910/319SETH 26.41 - EDEAt--M I LEA6i<r 5 ET . q -93; b fF- 15216 1360 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATERvC/C 11/12 17.20 17.20 15217 1365 BAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.75 OF FI C E-SU PP L-I E 5 i&-.09 = ----- -- OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.03 69.04 15zl8- 15 GOH-SERE^ ---REPAIR-RADIO/TRUCK 5-1.80 51-80 15219 1781 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. LIGHTS/PARK 194.40 194.40 15220 1850 COLTON COURIER SUB.COLTON COURIER/HCC SUB.COLTON COURIER/CITY 12.00 12.00 24.00 15221 1899 SUSAN CRAWFORD VIDIO CASSETTES/C.P. 40.67 40 67 1-522-2 -26 5 FOR T-B&ARBORN-6IF-E-IN-SURANEE 61FE-INS-.1-2/85 }s72 _ LIFE INS.12/85 21.30 LIFE INS.12/85 21.30 - - -IF•E-INS. 12/85 21-30- - ---- LIFE INS 12/85 7.10 82.72 - -i5223 3150 HAR-BAR--EOMPANY ST-.REPAIRTV-AR-IOUS-bGG*T-1-ONS -3-2-fr0 332r40---- 15224 3163 HEALTH NET HEALTH INS.12/85 164.22 HEALTH-INS-r1-2/85 2-46.-33 -- - HEALTH INS.12/85 246.33 HEALTH INS.12/85 246.33 -- -------- - -HEALTH-INS-r12/65--- 8i:11 - 985.32-- 15225 3167 HENOPP JEWELERS PLAQUES/CRIME PREVENT 143.10 143.10 15226 3217 HOUSTON'S SWEEPING STREET SWEEP.10/85 29149.68 29149 68 - L5227 -4164 K-FFART--#4432-- ------ KODAK- FILM - -- 24:1Q-- ----- KODAK FILM 12.98 37 08 15,228 -4420 V+R6IL--LIVEL--Y-----------CROSS.GUARD-1O -2&--1/8 -------127:20 ----127.20-- 15229 4470 LOMA LINDA DISPOSAL TRASH PICK-UP C/C 11/85 38.35 -- --- -- -- - - ----- - -- -- - - -- TRASH P I C K-U P v PARK- 11 / 8 5 -- -- - - -- 3 8 - 3 5- -- - - - - - VOCHREGR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 3 DATE 11/14/85 VOUCHER/WARRANT REGISTER --YOttemc-R-! VlFNDCR ____ -- rTEtt _ ___ __ WARRAN _ITE --V"OOK---_-_- WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT --152Z9- 4470 --tOMA-LINDA-DISPOSAL SPECIAL-PARK- PICKttPS --30.00---- 206.70- 15230 4896 N C R CORPORATION COMP.MAINT.1 MONTH 26.93 26.93 15231 4907 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-C/C 56.32 56.32 5545 plf-TRA-ENT-EkPR-PSEs- ---CERTIF-ICATtVCRI-M-€-P-REVEfVT 48.80 - ENVELOPES 393 97 PLAN.UNIFORM APPS 58.68 ---fNSPEIDTI ON- RECORD 5 40-15 CRIME PREVENT STATIONARY 26.40 NEIGHB.WATCH STATIONARY 26.41 594.41 i 15233 5579 PEOPLE HELPERS ONC. REC.SVCS.10/29-11/11/85 1►694 48 I v 6 9 4 . 4 8 'r 15234 5,501- PE-T-T-Y-E A 5 H PETTY-CASH-RE-IMB. tl:9 PETTY CASH REIMB. 13.50 PETTY CASH REIMB. 20.76 -PETT-Y-CAS-H-REIMB. 3 79 - PETTY CASH REIMB. 19.23 ' PETTY CASH REIMB. 23.80 PETTY -SASH -RE -PM 0 . -ii:6' - " 5 PETTY CASH REIMB. 10.00 184.70 }52-3rr 5-6 t m @S-TA5-TmiT-PitE-Ts EOC-t-TTER�StiRtlEY " 517 - 15236 6123 RALPH'S PLUMBING REPAIR WATER LEAK/F.S. 66.83 66 83 15237 6298 RIVERSIDE STRIPING SANDBLAST 35MPH/PALM 350.00 REPAIR PARK LOT/C/C 500.00 850.00 15238 6655 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. MAINT.SIGNALS 10/85 219.48 219.48 -15239- 666l---5-IMON-1S-t1OREtAt4D-AeCOUNTANT4---PART-PkY-.84Y85-AUDI-T 115-9Y:80--- 9591.8 15240 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY PARK LIGHTS (2) 24.79 -- ST.LIGHTS 9/1-10/31/85 4v762.35 49888.64 --�5z'41 fs73@ SO:CA.GAS-eOMPANY ---- - GASiCITY-BLUGS- - ' GAS C/C 548.50 588.62 ---k52k2- THE --SUN- - -' LEGAL AD - 27:95----- 7:95 6844 15243 6920 O.C.TANNER COMPANY 5 YEAR AWARD,ANSTINE 142.87 142.87 15244 7056 PEGGY TROTTIER LOCAL MILEAGEgTROTTIER 3.38 LOCAL MILEAGE�TROTTIER 9.40 12.78 15245 7309 UNION OIL CO.OF CALIFORNIA FUEL/TRUCK-9/85 50.72 50.72 - 15246- - 7791---- WATTENBARGERS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES- --------------�- 33-82 ----- - -- - r M1 _ OCHREGR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 4 ATE 11/14/85 VOUCHER/WARRANT REGISTER WARRAN- �91f6HER/ V€NDGR - - "EN&O ITEM------ WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT _15246 ?r4=--WAT-fE NO-AR GE-R-S-OFF-IEE-5-UP-PLY-- 9F-F-I£-E-4UPP-l:-IE 5 4 • 2 4-- - - OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.04 84.10 1 8 0 W ETA n B LI-5H i- 6--ee -P-A-N Y ItPB A-T E-EAt: COI)COI)E tr. fj6 -T&TAt::--lEHE-eK5 r 1 I CERTIFY THAT] fO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR THE P._A_YMENT U--CITY IA61LLUFS -- HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION ON THE CITY - i 2 2 FINANCE DIRECTOR r PENDING MY COUNCIL APPROVAL REVISED'.11/19/85 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MINUTESpuI�61�s�G1'NDA ]TV 21 3 L REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 1985 fi,a A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 7, 1985, at 5.48 p.m.`�_ PRESENT. Hugh J. Grant, Mayor"✓ Byron Matteson, Mayor Pro Tempore Tony Petta, Councilman ` Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman Dennis L. Evans, Councilman r6,p; r Seth Armstead, City Manager Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney John Shone, Acting City Engineer Ilene Dughman, City Clerk �� N ABSENT- Joe Kicak, City Engineer 3 *x The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Petta, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Councilman Evans. - EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARD ; Mayor Grant presented an Employee 5-Year Service Award to Randy Anstine, Community Services Director, congratulated him on an excellent job. °.., y r^ "UNTRASH GRAND TERRACE DAY" - CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION Ken Rinderhagen, 12738 Wilmac, gave Mayor Grant three Certificates of - Participation for presentation to Eric Rinderhagen, Marc Howard, and Jeff Lewis for their help to the Clean Community Systems on October 26, 1985, "Untrash Grand Terrace Day". Mayor Grant read and presented the Certificates of Participation, Mr. Rinderhagen also presented a certificate to Councilwoman Pfennighausen for her participation. PROCLAMATION - GREAT AMERICAN SMOKEOUT - NOVEMBER 21, 1985 Mayor Grant read Proclamation and presented it to Ed O'Neal, Mr. O'Neal advised that the Cancer Society is sponsoring a Non -Smoking Clinic on the Tuesday and Thursday preceding the Great American Smokeout - sign up sheets will be available at the Civic Center. PROCLAMATION - VETERANS' UNITY MONTH - NOVEMBER 1985 Mayor Grant read Proclamation, calling special attention to our tragic heroes who remain in Southeast Asia. Page 1 - (11/7/85) PROCLAMATION - LIONS WHITE CANE DAYS - OCTOBER 11 & 12 1985 Mayor Grant read Proclamation and presented it to Councilman Petta for forwarding to the president of the Lions Club, noted Proclamation was authorized last month by Council in behalf of the continuing and worthy efforts of the Lions Club. ARROWHEAD UNITED WAY CITATION Mayor Grant presented to Finance Director Schwab a citation from the Arrowhead United Way, thanking the employees of Grand Terrace for their contributions. CONSENT CALENDAR - Item B (Approval of Check Register No. 102485) and Item D Approva of 10/17/85 Minutes) were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. CC-85-326 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, ALL AYES, to approve the following Consent Calendar Items A. Approve Check Register No 102485, C. Ratify 11/7/85 CRA Actions. CHECK REGISTER 110785 Following clarification by Finance Director Schwab relative to CC-85-327 Warrant Nos. RA1557-1559 and 15194, Motion by Mayor Grant, Second by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. 110785, as submitted. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 10/17/85 CC-85-328 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to approve the minutes of October 17, 1985, as amended to reflect Councilman Petta's late arrival as an authorized absence for the purpose of attending a conference in Lake Arrowhead in behalf of Mayor Grant. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry Street, noted the problem of street lighting on Barton Road and requested illumination to alleviate traffic hazards and danger to pedestrians, felt lighting could also be considered on Mt. Vernon Avenue and Michigan Street, suggested using the wood poles already in existence to provide lighting at a minimal cost Responding to Mayor Grant relative to status on the street light issue, City Manager Armstead advised that engineering was currently working on the problem, noted that engineering reports had been previously prepared, however, proposals brought forth to Council had been disapproved Page 2 - (11/7/85) Responding to Mayor Pro Tem Matteson's recommendation that staff investigate and submit a report on the feasibility and cost of a street lighting program for all of Barton Road, City Attorney Hopkins recommended Council review the previous information submitted for a proposed Landscaping and Street Lighting District due to the cost to prepare this information. Councilman Evans questioned whether the Supreme Court had rendered an opinion that a lighting district would be in violation of Proposition 13, cited a recent Rialto incident where a proposed district was denied. City Attorney Hopkins advised this specific type of benefit district has been upheld, Rialto's proposed district was turned down due to failure to comply with proper legal noticing requirements. Councilman Evans stated, based upon his knowledge of past assessment districts, he could not support such a district, however, would be willing to review documentation, including legal opinions rendered. Mayor Grant requested prior engineering reports be resubmitted for review of cost and feasibility along with legal opinions rendered relative to the establishment of a Lighting Assessment District to fund such a project. Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, to direct staff to investigate this matter and arrange to have arms installed on existing wood poles on Barton Road for lighting and pay the minimal energy cost. Following Council discussion relative to cost and the necessity for additional information, Acting City Engineer Shone suggested submitting the following at next meeting (1) Maps of Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue showing existing poles, (2) Staff recommendations for proposed lighting locations and estimated costs thereof. Taking into consideration Mr. Shone's suggestions, Councilman Petta withdrew Motion, with its Second in concurrence. Ed O'Neal, 22608 Minona Drive, reported on the success of the essay and poster contest in the Grand Terrace Schools, organized by Sharon Korgan, Community Service Officer, in conjunction with Crime Prevention Month, invited parents to visit the schools and see what the students have accomplished, related that letters will be sent to the parents of nine children requesting their presence at the next Council meeting to observe the presentation of plaques by the Mayor to the winners of the contests, encouraged participation in the Great American Smokeout. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - Minutes of the September 16, 1985 meeting were provided. PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT - Minutes of the August 5, and October 21, 1985 meetings were provided. Dick Rollins, Chairman, praised Randy Anstine on his outstanding service to the City for the past 5 years. The following was reported (1) Committee voted to Page 3 - (11/7/85) CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE REPORT - October 7, 1985 minutes were provided. usan Crawford, airman, reported on the success of the Domestic Violence Workshop, next Town Meeting to be held on November 19th at 7.00 p.m. - topic will be Earthquake Preparedness. WILDERNESS PARK AD HOC COMMITTEE - BLUE MOUNTAIN Councilman Evans noted the Parks and Recreation Committee's recommendations in the October 21, 1985 minutes, relative to appraising the value of the land owned by the City on Blue Mountain, and, if it could be sold at a substantial sum, setting these monies aside for the development of a park site as proposed by the Edison Company, voiced support of above recommendations, opposed any more time or effort being expended on acquiring additional land for Wilderness Park, felt there were much more important items to be concentrating on, stating this did not rank high on his priority list. Mayor Grant advised he was satisfied with what the Committee has accomplished thusfar, as reported by Councilman Petta at the last meeting. Councilman Petta, with Susan Crawford, Chairwoman of the Wilderness Park Committee concurring, observed the importance of preserving the Wilderness Park area in perpetuity for the residents of Grand Terrace and felt it a worthwhile endeavor that should be continued. Mr. Rollins advised that the Parks and Recreation Committee is not opposed to preserving Blue Mountain as a Wilderness Park area, but concerned with losing the City's 1.5 acres. Susan Crawford related that it was initially thought that the 1.5 acres had been donated to the City; however, when it was realized that a substantial amount of money was spent for the land to be used as a parking area providing access to Blue Mountain, the idea of trading the acreage in exchange for Dennis Kidd's property was dropped. Ms. Crawford further noted that she is expending time and effort at no cost to the City, Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt Ms. Crawford should be praised and given credit for her efforts. CC-85-329 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, that Susan Crawford continue investigating the possibilities of gaining additional land for the expansion of Blue Mountain, carried, 3-2, with Councilmembers Evans and Pfennighausen voting NOE. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT - Minutes were provided from the ( eptem er 19, 1985 meeting. CC-85-330 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilman Evans, ALL AYES, to approve the appointment of Jay Tibbles on the Emergency Operations Committee for a term to expire 6/30/88. Recessed at 7 05 p.m., reconvened at 7-25 p.m., with all members present. Page 4 - (11/7/85) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, DEALING WITH NOISE & DECLARING THE EMISSION OF CERTAIN NOISES TO BE A NUISANCE (Second Reading) City Attorney Hopkins read the title of the Ordinance. Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing. Supporting Testimony Chester Easter, 21963 Tanager, presented a petition with 60 signatures from the residents of Tanager Street and Royal Avenue, requesting the Council adopt a Noise Ordinance to control the public nuisance of businesses operational between the hours of 10 00 p.m. to 7 00 a.m. weekdays, 5 00 p.m. to 8 00 a.m. holidays and weekends. Mr. Easter gave testimony on background problems and events leading up to today's continuing noise problems, proposed a resolution to the Grand Terrace Noise Ordinance to control hours of operations within an MR zone abutted on any side by an R1 zone, in Section 6, Prohibitive Noise, under a subtitle of (h) MR Zones Abutted on Any Side by an R1 Zone. Report and Petition are on file in the City er s epartment . Scott Lanier, 21973 Tanager, and Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry, concurred with above observations and spoke in favor of adopting a Noise Ordinance. Opposing Testimony Tom Thomson, son of Fred Thomson, owner of Inland Lumber Company, read Inland Lumber Company's November 5, 1985 letter requesting disapproval of the proposed ordinance dealing with noise (a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office), proposed the following self-imposed noise abatement measures (1) A buffer zone area between the residential neighborhood and the lumber yard to provide sufficient noise reduction between the hours of 10 00 p.m. and 7.00 a.m.; (2) Building of a block wall adjacent to the deadend of Royal Street which abuts the property in an unfenced portion of the property line, (3) No unloading or loading of trucks during the quiet hours between the two material warehouses. Rebuttal Mr. Easter felt that Inland Lumber Company could exist and operate their business under conditions set forth by the Noise Ordinance as illustrated by past performance, and their abatement measures were merely a smoke screen. Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing. Mayor Grant noted receipt of the following correspondence (1) Letter of November 5, 1985 from Fred Thomson, previously read into the record by Tom Thomson, (2) Letter of October 26, 1985 from Richard G. Allen, - 12742 Vivienda, requesting Council "to reconsider the urgency of a tough Noise Ordinance for Grand Terrace and please find that an Page 5 - (11/7/85) Ordinance is urgently needed constraining unnecessary noise along with swift and sure enforcement measures." (3) Letter of October 31, 1985 from Steve Anderson, Modern Materials/Trojan Trucking, to Tom Thomson relative to concerns regarding passage of Noise Ordinance was discussed with the Mayor, the City Manager, and Councilmembers. Additional contact was made with the following individuals• (1) Sue Noreen, representing SCE, requested the following paragraph be added in Section 3 of the proposed Noise Ordinance as follows "Construction maintenance and repairs of equipment, apparatus, or facilities of Parks and Recreation Departments, Public Works projects, essential public services and facilities of Public Utilities.", (2) Cliff Williams, representing the County's Environmental Health Service, indicated that the proposed decibel levels of 60 dBa at night and 65 dBa during the day may not provide the protection desired by Council. Councilman Evans questioned the possibility of removing all references to decibel levels as well as adding the prohibiting of noise in MR Zones abutted on any side by an R1 Zone previously proposed by Mr. Easter. City Attorney Hopkins advised these revisions could be made. Councilman Evans further questioned whether the proposed 125 foot buffer zone by Inland Lumber Company would take care of the problem. Acting City Engineer John Shone advised that the buffer zone along with the building of a block wall will help to abate the noise problem, however, in the quiet of the night noise would still be heard. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant to waive the full reading of the Ordinance. Councilman Petta'voiced concern relative to the noise problem, related receiving a call from Mr. William Lewis, Attorney for Inland Lumber Company, who requested a two week postponement to allow him the opportunity to meet with our staff and prepare an appropriate solution to satisfy all concerned parties. In light of testimony given, Councilwoman Pfennighausen, with Councilman Evans in concurrence, expressed support of granting a two week postponement and, additionally, requested the removal of all references to dBa levels from the Ordinance. Supporting a two week postponement, Mayor Pro Tem Matteson withdrew Motion, with Second by Mayor Grant in concurrence for the purpose of obtaining additional information. CC-85-331 Motion by Councilman Evans, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to direct City Attorney Hopkins to eliminate any references to decibel levels and review Chester Easter's proposal for incorporation into Noise Ordinance. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Matteson's question relative to discerning violations of noise levels without dBa measurements, City Page 6 - (11/7/85) Attorney Hopkins indicated it would be basically a subjective determination. Mayor Grant felt the input of both Mr. Easter and Fred Thomson should be taken into consideration and investigated, therefore, expressed support of the Motion Motion No. CC-85-331 carried, ALL AYES. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT Councilwoman Pfennighausen reported the following (1) Discussion of its November 5 meeting included need for a plan for the conceptual use of existing land especially along the Barton Road corridor, (2) Suggested uses for the land at the La Crosse off ramp, (3) Specific plans to provide potential developers, (4) Felt tone for future commercial and industrial development extremely positive. CITY ENGINEER REPORT (1) Lien Agreement (GTC 85-22) James. L. Harber - Acting City Engineer Shone submitted a copy of proposed Lien Agreement of October 2, 1985 between the City and Jim Harber requesting permission to defer insulation of curb and street improvements in front of his property on Van Buren Street. Jim Harber, 21456 West Palm Avenue, requested that the proposed widening of Van Buren be deferred, thereby delaying curb and street improvements, until such time as development of the area takes place. CC-85-332 Following clarification, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilman Petta, ALL AYES, to approve Lien Agreement (GTC 85-22), authorize Mayor Grant to execute and recordation by the City Clerk to become binding on future owners of the property. (2) Mr. Shone advised a status report on Mt Vernon Villas, McMillin Development, was submitted - in addition, fling fees have been paid, therefore, project will be processed through the Planning Commission for site and architectural approval, (3) Updated information provided on proposed signal change on Barton Road and Mt. Vernon - cost estimated as $100,000 not including right-of-way fees, discussed alternative to reduce cost by approximately $30,000 - leave existing poles in place and put a left turn arrow in the middle of the road protected by a curb, requested guidance from Council relative to the acquisition of the right-of-way necessary for calculating total cost estimates. Following discussion relative to discrepancy between amount previously budgeted ($48,000) for signalization and the $100,000 estimated actual cost, Councilman Evans requested, with Council's concurrence, continuance of signalization issue until the November 21st meeting to allow staff to submit additional data Page 7 - (11/7/85) Relative to Mt. Vernon Villas, City Attorney Hopkins questioned whether the SCE property was included in Mr. Trevino's new proposal, clarified that if only the Alexander property was added, this would be considered a minor deviation, and, therefore, would not necessitate going through the Planning Commission process or payment of filing fees. Councilman Petta requested Mr. Al Trevino be contacted to clarify intent and rectify matter if necessary. Relative to expediting the McMillin Development project if it must go through the Planning Commission process, City Attorney Hopkins advised that a time limit may be designated for timely submission to Council with recommendations by the Planning Commission, stated Mr. Trevino indicated desire for his proposal to be placed on the December agenda. CITY MANAGER REPORT - City Manager Armstead reported the following 1 Noted attendance at Lake Arrowhead Conference and benefits derived therefrom, (2) Requested support in reducing lighting costs for Civic Center. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilman Petta reported that Mr. Wagner accepted Wilden Pump's offer to p ant trees on his property, requested Wilden Pump be notified to that effect. Councilman Evans reported the following (1) Receipt of letter from Rhoda Sa—t-e—M—MT, President of the Board for the Grand Terrace Youth Basketball Organization, requesting contributions by sponsorship of teams, recommended each Councilmember donate $25.00, for a total of $125.00 for the purpose of sponsoring a basketball team - Council concurred with recommendation, (2) Suggested staff be directed to completely update General Plan for Grand Terrace, City Manager Armstead advised that staff would review plan along with the Planning Commission, (3) Recommended staff be directed to instruct Alex Estrada, Planning Director, to begin preparing a Master Plan for Barton Road corridor including estimation of how long it would take and the boundaries it would encompass, (4) Selection of a Park Site - Referenced October 15, 1985 memo received from Sue Noreen, representing SCE, indicating the Pico Site as a more favorable location than Van Buren, questioned rationale behind objections to the Van Buren Site and felt both locations should be reviewed and, whichever site chosen, incorporated into the Master Plan, (5) additionally, felt the issue of a second potential site for the Grand Terrace Elementary School should be addressed in the preparation of a Master Plan. Mayor Grant voiced support of a comprehensive Master Plan, not merely restricted to the Barton Road corridor, requested input from staff be submitted to Mr Estrada relative to park and school site selections Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, concurring, felt Master Plan should encompass all commercially developable areas in Grand Terrace, also stated a particular style should be selected Relative to selection of a park location, Mayor Grant felt Sue Noreen's recommendation of the Pico Site was viable City Manager Page 8 - (11/7/85) Armstead advised that Sue Noreen was requesting minute action from Council to proceed with the Pico Site as well as to investigate the Van Buren Site. Following discussion, Motion by Councilman Evans, Second by Mayor Grant, to prepare a formal document indicating that Council is requesting SCE to consider both the Pico and Van Buren locations as potential park sites. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt Motion premature and suggested all Councilmembers look at both sites to determine if Van Buren should even be considered. Mayor Grant withdrew his Second to give Council the opportunity to view both sites. Motion by Councilman Evans died for lack of Second. Motion by Councilman Evans, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to select Van Buren as a potential park site, failed 2-3, with Mayor Grant, Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, and Councilman Petta voting NOE. Mayor Grant requested City Manager Armstead have the issue of the location of park site be placed on Agenda for next Council meeting. Dick Rollins related that Community Services Director Anstine has the Parks and Recreation Committee's recommendations and felt they should be considered, Mayor Grant assured that all opinions of the Committee will be taken into consideraton. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson reported the following (1) Cited citizen complaint re ative to traffic and drug problems near Terrace Hills Junior High School, requested that, when items of this nature are brought forth by Council and direction given to the Sheriff's Department, reports be furnished as to what has been done and the results thereof, (2) Questioned the engineering of the sidewalks along Barton Road relative to the poles and signs in the middle of them, felt they look strange and are potentially dangerous. City Manager Armstead related that direction has been given to Engineering to have the street signs removed from the sidewalks, (3) Attendance at Lake Arrowhead Conference, requested Council follow-up with a workshop in the near future. Councilwoman Pfennighausen commented that people who service the community in a vo unteer capacity, receiving no financial rebate for time and energy expended, deserve some recognition by the City. CC-85-333 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, that Letters of Appreciation be drafted and sent to all Committee members during the next two weeks honoring the Thanksgiving holiday. Mayor Grant advised that the Grand Terrace Women's Club has requested a fee waiver for use of the Community Meeting Room every third Wednesday of the month beginning November 20, 1985. Page 9 - (11/7/85) CC-85-334 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to waive the fees for the Grand Terrace Women's Club use of the Community Meeting Room. Mayor Grant reported the following (1) Represented Grand Terrace at the SA A and Omnitrans meetings on November 8, 1985, (2) Concurred with comments relative to the beneficial nature of the Lake Arrowhead Conference - felt it a unique and valuable experience that should be followed up on as soon as possible. SOLICITING LICENSE FOR TEEN CHALLENGE WALK-A-THON Julian Torres, 5445 Chicago Avenue, Riverside, spoke in behalf of Harvey Pinkney, with regard to securing a permit for solicrtat'ron in the City of Grand Terrace, related that Teen Challenge is a Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Program and the specific reasons for the Walk-A-Thon are to raise funds to train men and women in this field and to promote public awareness of their program. Councilwoman Pfennighausen, although highly supportive of the Teen Challenge Ministry, could not support authorizing door-to-door solicitation. City Attorney Hopkins advised that individuals have the basic right to solicit donations, and that the issue at hand is whether the organization is valid and that no fraud exists. Captain Bradford, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, recommended precautionary measures be taken and the license be issued with the following stipulations (1) File a plan with the City including the date of the Walk-a-Thon, a list of names of solicitors and areas in which they will be soliciting, (2) Solicitors be paired, females accompanied by a male. CC-85-335 Following discussion and clarification, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilman Petta, to approve the issuance of a Soliciting License for the Teen Challenge Walk-a-Thon, with stipulations as outlined by Captain Bradford, carried, 4-1, with Councilwoman Pfennighausen voting NOE. ORDINANCE NO. 98 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND, CA, RELATING TO THE REGULATION AND PROHIBITION OF SMOKING (First Reading) City Attorney Hopkins read the title of the Ordinance and briefly summarized the smoking regulations contained therein. Ed O'Neil, 22608 Minona Drive, spoke in favor of the Ordinance, advised it shifts the responsibility to the nonsmoker, if the nonsmoker finds a smoking situation objectionable, the smoker must take corrective action. Councilman Petta requested that Ordinance be adopted as an Urgency Ordinance to coincide with the Great American Smoke -Out on November 21, 1985. Page 10 - (11/7/85) CC-85-336A Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, to waive full reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 98. CC-85-336B Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilman Petta, to amend Motion No. CC-85-336A, to include only waiving full reading of Ordinance No. 98. Motion No. CC-85-336B, to amend Motion No. CC-85-336A, carried, ALL AYES. Motion No. CC-85-336A, as amended by Motion No. CC-85-336B, carried, ALL AYES. Councilman Evans felt smoking should be outlawed in its entirety in public places to protect the nonsmoker's rights. CC-85-337 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, to adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 98, carried, 4-1, with Councilwoman Pfennighausen voting NOE. ADJOURNED at 10 00 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held Thursday—, November 21, 1985, at 6 15 p.m., preceded by an Annual Potlock Dinner at 5 30 p.m. commemorating the City's 7th Birthday. Respectfully submitted, Ci ty Clerk APPROVED. Mayor Page 11 - (11/7/85) Date 11/15/85 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: 11/21/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3D SUBJECT: Waiving Full Reading of Ordinances as Consent Calendar Item FUNDING IS REQUIRED NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX A unanimous vote is required to waive full reading of an ordinance to allow it to be adopted by title only. Because some ordinances are controversial, separate motions have been recommended. Council still quite often combines the waiving and adoption into one motion. There also may be a tendency to feel voting in favor of the waiver indicates support of the ordinance. Therefore, the following item will routinely be placed on the Consent Calendar to eliminate full reading of any ordinance acted upon at that meeting "WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA." If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk. ID I. v V. I Y, 1 7 V J STAF REPCRT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE Nov. 21, 1985 .qi" AGENDA ITEM NO 3E SUBJECT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The State of California has adopted a Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 (Government Code Sections 66700 -- 66793). This act requires each County and City to prepare a Solid Waste Management Master Plan. This plan in its entirety is in the Council Reading Box for your review. To comply with the State of California Government Code and County Solid Waste Management Plan, the resolution is attached for your approval. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN SA bt Attachment (Resolution) P E N T N G C O U N C I L A P R O V A L RESOLUTION NO. 85- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REVISED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLID WASTE_ MANAGEMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted the Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 (Sections 66700-66793, Government Code), and WHEREAS, said Act requires each County to prepare a Solid Waste Management Master Plan, and WHEREAS, Section 66780 5 of said Government Code requires that the Master Plan be revised at least every three years from the date of initial approval, and WHEREAS, the original Solid Waste Management Master Plan was approved by a majority of the cities containing a majority of the population of the incorporated areas in 1975, and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has authorized revision of the said Plan, and WHEREAS, Section 66780 of Said Government Code requires the revised Solid Waste Management Master Plan for San Bernardino County be approved by a majority of the cities containing a majority of the population of the incorporated areas, and WHEREAS, said Master Plan has been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby approve said Master Plan and concurs in the objectives set forth in the Master Plan, the methods and organization for implementation of the programs, procedures for financing recommended programs, and the role identified in the Plan for the City of Grand Terrace. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1985. ATTEST ity Clerk of the City of G Mayor of the City of GranJ—Fe—rrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand certify that the foregoing Resolution was meeting of the City Council of the City of of November, 1985, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form ity Attorney introduced and Grand Terrace City Clerk Terrace, do hereby adopted at a regular held on the 21st day -2- T aA F F R ro to G ROT :!5j* C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE Nov. 21, 1985 AGENDA ITEM NO 3F SUBJECT STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX AB 1073, Cortese amendea section 53600 of the Government Code, requires the Treasurer to render to the governing body an annual statement of investment policy This legislation grew from the concern over the recent losses of public funds due to risky investment practices. The Investment Policy for the City of Grand Terrace is a very conservative version of the model adopted by the City Municipal Treasurers' Association. The City of Grand Terrace maintains a very conservative investment strategy with safety of the principal being the most important criteria for selecting an investment. The investment philosophy of the City's investment practices is to insure the absolute safety of the portfolio, maintaining sufficient liquidity for ongoing cash needs while yielding the highest return possible STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL REVIEW THE ATTACHED STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND ACCEPT THE INVESTMENT POLICY SET FORTH BY THE CITY TREASURER. SAA bt Enclosures CITY OF GRAND TERRACE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY 1985 PURPOSE This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's idle cash, and to outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to enhance the interest earnings of the portfolio while insuring the safety of the pooled cash. OBJECTIVE The City's cash management system is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus enabling the City to invest funds to the fullest extent possible. The City attempts to obtain the highest yield obtainable as long as investments meet the criteria established for safety and liquidity POLICY The City of Grand Terrace operates its temporary pooled cash investment under the Prudent Man Rule (Civic Code Sect. 2261, et seq). This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600 et seq) Investments may be made in the following media Securities of the U.S. Government or its Agencies Certificates of Deposits or Time Deposits placed with Savings and Loans or Banks that are fully insured by the FDIC/or FSLIC. Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Bankers' Acceptances Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Repurchase Agreements Passbook Savings Accounts CITY OF GRAND TERRACE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY PAGE 2 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING INVESTMENTS AND THE ORDER OF PRIORITY 1. Safety. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or a combination of these amounts The City only operates in those investments considered very safe. 2 Liquidity This refers to the ability to convert to cash with minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest 3. Yield. Yield is the potential dollar earnings an invest- ment can provide, otherwise known as rate of return. SAFEKEEPING Securities purchased from broker dealers shall be held in third party safekeeping by the Trust Department of the City's bank or other designated third party trust. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100 percent as possible. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the Finance Department under the direction of the City Treasurer. The basic premise underlying the City's Investment Policy is to insure the absolute safety of the portfolio, maintaining sufficient liquidity for ongoing cash needs while achieving the highest return possible. kaW4W etrm tea City Treasurer City of Grand Terrace UAIL Nov 14, 198 S7 AF I REPGR v C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM JX) MEETING DATE Nov. 21, 1985 AGENDA ITEM NO 3G (A & B) Z" SUBJECT CIVIC CENTER CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION REFUNDING FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The City of Grand Terrace has the potential opportunity to refund the current Certificates of Participation for the Civic Center and issue new certificates to take advantage of the lower interest rates in the market today. The City currently has a bond with a rating of Bbb and a rate of 10.125. If the City could obtain bond insurance, the new issue would be rated AAA and the City could reissue at one to two points below the rate of the current issue The insurance and issuance costs could run 1 to 1.5 points, but a .5 to 1 point gain could still be realized. With that assumption we could reduce the yearly debt service by $7,500 per year or a total of $208,000 over the remaining life of the issue. We need the preliminary documents approved for two reasons. One is to insure the refunding process begun prior to January 1, 1986 at which time proposed legislation by congress would limit the type of refunding. The second is to allow these documents to be submitted to the insurance company for bond insurance These documents are only the first step in the refunding process and do not give the authority to issue new certificates. If the cash flows look favorable, the staff will be back before the Council at a later date with a request to issue new certificates. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL APPROVE 1. THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION MAKING DESIGNATIONS INCIDENT TO REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CIVIC CENTER PROJECT) 2 THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION PRELIMINARILY APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CIVIC CENTER PROJECT) TS bt ATTACHMENTS (Resolutions will be provided prior to Council Meeting) .J PL�'�U� U Cli Y COUNC11_ APPROVAL COUNCIL AGENDA LTFM 91 _3G ( a) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPOINTMENTS AND DESIGNATIONS AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS INCIDENT TO THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CIVIC CENTER PROJECT) WHEREAS, the City has heretofore caused $3,430,000 Certifi- cates of Participation, dated as of December 1, 1983 (the "Certi- ficates"), to be issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof to finance the Civic Center Pro3ect; and WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to cause issuance and sale of Refunding Certificates of Participation (the "Refunding Certificates") to accomplish an advance refunding of the original Certificates; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make necessary appointments and designations to accomplish the advance refunding of the original Certificates: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The City Council hereby makes the appointments and designations specified as follows: (a) M. F. Whipple & Co., Inc. is hereby designated as the underwriter for the purchase of the Refunding Certificates (the "Underwriter"), subDect to approval of a Purchase Agreement; (b) Nazarek, Harper, Hopkins & McFarlin is hereby designated as special counsel for the purpose of preparing all documents and rendering of all opinions necessary for the issuance and sale of the Refunding Certificates ("Special Counsel"), subDect to approval of an agreement for special counsel services; and (c) Crocker National Bank is hereby appointed as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent (the "Trustee"), sub]ect to approval of an agreement for such services. Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes and approves the participation of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace as set forth in the agreements. Section 4. The Underwriter is hereby authorized and directed to make application to those insurance companies and rating agencies deemed appropriate by the Underwriter for purposes of obtaining an insurance commitment and/or rating on the Refunding Certificates. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor 2. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM M 3 C_J66- PE NDMG Cffy CO -UNC1L APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CIVIC CENTER PROJECT) WHEREAS, the City has heretofore caused $3,430,000 Certifi- cates of Participation, dated as of December 1, 1983 (the "Certi- ficates"), to be issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof to finance the Civic Center Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to cause issuance and sale of Refunding Certificates of Participation (the "Refunding Certificates") to accomplish an advance refunding of the original Certificates; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed drafts of the agreements necessary to accomplish the advance refunding of the original Certificates: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The City Council hereby declares its intention to issue Refunding Certificates to accomplish an advance refunding of the original Certificates issued and sold to finance construction of the Civic Center Project. Section 3. The City Council hereby preliminarily approves the agreements specified as follows: 1. 1985 Site Lease 2. 1985 Lease -Purchase Agreement 3. 1985 Trust Agreement 4. 1985 Lease -Purchase Assignment Agreement 5. 1985 Security and Assignment Agreement 6. Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk and authorizes necessary modifications to be made to the agreements to accomplish the advance refunding of the original Certificates. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor 2. .T X : 'T C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: 11/21/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A SUBJECT: Ordinance Dealing with Noise FUNDING IS REQUIRED NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX Date. 11/15/85 The Public Hearing and second reading of the Ordinance provided at the November 7 meeting is being continued, and the City Attorney is preparing an alternate Ordinance, with modifications subseouent to that November 7 meeting, which will also be provided for Council consideration. Should Council choose to adopt the alternate Ordinance, another first reading will be required. Staff is recommending Council continue the Public Hearing to receive public testimony relative to both versions of the Ordinance. Staff Recommends Council (1) ADOPT FIRST READING OF AN ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY, (2) ADOPT SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE AS SUBMITTED AT THE 11/7/85 MEETING BY TITLE ONLY. PENNNIG CIT. , WUNCiL APPROVAj. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DEALING WITH NOISE AND DECLARING THE EMISSION OF CERTAIN NOISES TO BE A NUISANCE NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Intent. It is the intent of this section to protect properties within the City and the health and safety of persons from environmental nuisances and hazards and provide a pleasing environment throughout the City. The standards set forth herein provide maximum tolerability limits on adverse environmental effects created through excessive noise. Section 2. Violations to be an Infraction. It is hereby determined that every violation hereof is an infraction punishable as follows: (a) A fine not exceeding $50.00 for A first violation; (b) A fine not exceeding $100.00 for a second violation within a one year period; (c) A fine not exceeding $.200.00 for each additional violation within a one year period. Section 3. Exemptions. The following sources of noise nuisances are exempt from the provisions hereof: (a) Emergency equipment, vehicles and devices. (b) Temporary construction, maintenance, or demolition activities between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., except Sundays and National Holidays. Section 4. Decibel Measurement Criteria. Any decibel measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this Section shall be based on a reference sound pressure of 20 micro - pascals as measured with a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network (scale) at show response. Section 5. Special Activities. In addition to the exemptions provided for hereinabove, the following activities shall be exempted from the provisions provided for herein: (a) City or school approved activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds and public or private school grounds including but not"limited to athletic and school entertainment events between the 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. (b) Outdoor gatherings, dances, shows, and sporting and entertainment events, provided that said events and conducted pursuant to the approval of a Temporary Use Permits issued by the City. (c) Noises produced by mechanical devices, apparatus or equipment used, related to, or connected with emergency machinery, vehicle, work or warning alarm or bell, provided the sounding of any bell, or alarm on any building or motor vehicle shall terminate its operation within thirty minutes in any hour of its being activated. (d) Noise sources associated with or vibration created by construction, repair or remodeling or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at anytime on Sunday or a National Holiday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standards herein. (e) All devices, apparatus or equipment associated with agriculture operations provided as follows: (1) Operations to not take place between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (2) Such operations and equipment are utilized for protection or salvage of agricultural crops during periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather conditions. (3) Such operations and equipment are as— sociated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application provided the application is made in accordance with permits issued or regulations enforced by the California Department of Agriculture. (f) Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property provided said activities take place between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any day except Sunday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday. Section 6. Prohibited Noise. No operation or activity shall cause any source of sound at any location or allow the creation of noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the Ambient Base noise levels to exceed 60 dBA during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 65 dBA during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 P.M. (basic noise levels). In addition, the following noises are prohibited and are declared to be nuisances. (a) Peddlers Use of Loud Noise to Advertise Goods. No peddler or mobile vendor or any person in their behalf shall shout, cry out, or use any device or instrument to make sounds for the purpose of advertising in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance. (b) Animal Noises. No person owning or having the charge, care, custody, or control of any dog, or other animal or fowl shall allow or permit the same to habitually howl, bark, yelp or make other noises, in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance. (c) Radios, Television Sets, Musical Instruments and Similar Devices. No person shall operate or permit the operation or playing of any device which reproduces, produces or amplifies sound, (such as a radio, musical instrument, phonograph or sound amplifier) in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance. The operation of any such devise between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:QO a.m. in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a distance of fifty feet from the building, structure or vehicle in which it is located shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section. (d) The Sounding of Whistles, Horns, Bells or Other Such Devices No person shall make or cause to be made the loud, sudden and unnecessary blowing of whistles, sounding of horns, ringing of bells or use of signaling devices by operators or railroad locomotives, motor trucks and other transportation equipment. (e) Loading or Unloading of Trucks. No person shall create or cause to be created loud and excessive noise in connection with the loading or unloading of motor trucks and other vehicles between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. where such noise exceeds 60dBA. (f) Operation of Equipment. The operation or use between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of any pile driver, steam shovel, pneumatic hammers, derrick, steam or electric hoist, power driven saw, or any other tool or apparatus the use of which is attended by loud and excessive noise which exceeds 60dBA is prohibited. (g) Automotive Repair Works No person shall do automotive repair, automotive body or fender or other work on metal ob]ects and metal parts between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., so as to cause loud and excessive noise or where much noise exceeds 60dBA. Section 7. Exterior Noise Standards. It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the City to create any noise or allow the creation of any noise on the property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on the property line of any other property to exceed the basic noise level, as hereinafter ad3usted: (a) Basic Noise Level for accumulative period of not more than 15 minutes in any one hour. (b) Basic Noise Level plus 5 dBA for -accumulative period of not more than 10 minutes in any one hour. (c) Basic Noise Level plus 14 dBA for accumulative period i of not more than 5 minutes in any one hour. (d) Basic Noise Level plus 15 dBA at any time. If the intruding noise source is continuous and connot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the measured noise level obtained while the noise is in operation shall be compared directly to the allowable noise level standards for the time of day the noise level is measured. The reasonableness of temporarily discontinuing the noise generation by an intruding noise source shall be determined by the City Planner for the purpose of establishing the existing ambient noise level at the measurement location. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on 31st day after its adoption. Section 9. Posting. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places, designated for such purpose by the City Council, within fifteen (15) days after its passage. Section 10. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the day of , 1985, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1985. Section 11. Adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 19th day of September, 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Mayor of the City of Grand Grand Terrace and of the Terrace and of the City City Council thereof. Council there of. b I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of -- do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was special meeting of the City Council of the Terrace held of the 19th day of September, following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form - City Attorney Grand Terrace adopted at a City of Grand 1985 by the (;`QMMI9SION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 4BYNCRAc[ndq ITEM se lii COUNCIL MEETING DATE November 21, 198� COMMISSION/COMMITTEE Parks and Recreation Committee DATE 11-5-85 SUBJECT Application for committee membership submitted by Barbara M. Conley. PROBLEM To fill an existing vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Committee. Facts: The committee has reviewed Ms. Conley's application and agreed that she would be an asset to the committee. ALTERNATIVES: SOLUTION Recommend acceptance by City Council. REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF The Parks and Recreation Committee respectfully recommends that the City Council approve 11s. Conley's application, and appoint her as a member of the Parks and Recreation Committee to fill the unexpired term of Gary Dishaw, term to expire June 30, 1986. C I T Y OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AS A MEMBER OF = arks & Lecreation Committee NAME Barbara vi. Conley ADDRESS 22285 Dove St., Grand terrace HOME PHONE 783-0609 BUSINESS PHONE 783-o669 OCCUPATION Instructor EDUCATION (List highest year completed and all degrees) BA in Business zdministration, Cal State Fullerton-1979 10 additional units in Personnel ivianagement, Finance, Unemployment com?ensat ion. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? Yes ( ) No �) If so, please list. Why are you interested in this position I was the kecreation Director at Bourns for 1 year and enjoyed the position. I am interested in becoming active in the community. What do you consider to be your major qualifications? Past experience with a recrea- 'ion committee rAsronsiole fora budget, personal interest in community activities being a resiaent ana parent of Grand Lerrace. REFERENCES 1 Chari %allace, Dean of �ontiruing Jaucation, RCC 2 -3at �,scamilla, 3152-� Panararra, -,iverside, Ca 92500 3 Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel .could be useful to the City Council r4TY OF gRHNB T EQPr 1J 11L'� :li 11Vi V1LL :lill�ly I nave been lookin-r for -Nara to oecoming an active resiaent of Crand Terrace ana the ?arks ,-c Recreation Committee is one that I have been interested in joining for some time now. I feel I can bring to the committee past experience and knowledge of a financially responsiole Recreation Committee. -�s a resiaent of Grana Terrace I share in the needs and desires for growth and op» rtunity. As a parent I bring the same concerns and issues of every parent. Honefully, I will become a liaison oetween wnat the people in Grand Terrace want of their Recreation Committee to insuring in committee form tnat the Parks -,c Recreation Committee is doing their utmost in striving to fulfill the needs of their community. Nov )er 21, 1985 Council Agenda Item 4 6C Historical & Cultural Committee Minutes of the November 4,1985 Meeting The meeting was called to order by the Secretary at 7 00 PM. Those present were Barbara Bayus, Betty Duarte, Irene Mason, Ann Petta, Viola Gratson and Hannah Laister. The minutes of the October 7th meeting were read. Barbara made the motion to accept, Irene seconded, all approved. The minutes of the special meeting of October 14th were then read. Ann made the motion to accept, Irene seconded, all approved. The Treasurer's report was read. $328.28 has been spent to date with some of the bills for the Art Show still to be paid, leaving a balance at October 31 of $1,171.72. The next order of business was to elect a new chairman. Irene made a motion to nonimate Viola, Betty seconded. There were no other nominations. Viola accepted and the vote for her was unanimous. Viola then took over the meeting from the secretary. Old Business The Art Show turned out to be very sucessful v� th over 100 people attending. Virginia Harford will write an article in the Press Enterprise about the show. The secretary will write a letter to Justin and Patty Case and Rick Caldwell in appreciation of their hard work in making and setting up the screens. We will ask the City Council to send them a letter also. The display boards are now a permanent part of city property and available for loan toother committees or organizations. The committee gave Justing permission to go over the $150 we had alloted him. Pictures were taken and some will be put in the Chamber of Commerce wsl tter. nn will call each artist with thanks and also input on their thoughts on the ow. For the future, we will ask the Council for per- mission to use the walls for hanging paintings using something that will no mar the walls. The committee agreed that, in the future, all mall will go to City Hall, not an individual. Staff has agreed to give us storage space for our things. Show Cases: Betty brought a brochure on cases and reported also that we may be able to get a discount at Patton's. She will look into this and also get more prices. Viola will go to the Colton Library. We are looking for a case to display items received from our sister city. Birthday Party. Betty and Ann are coordinating lists for food items. Betty will order a cake. All members will be at City Hall at 4 PM to set up. All plans going well. It was decided to have no December meeting. The next meeting will be January 6th, 1986. The meeting was adjoured on motion by Barbara, seconded by Ann, at 7 50 PM. Res ectfully�submitted, Hannah Laister, Secretary rJ u Historical & Cultural Committee Special Meeting October 149 1985 A special meeting was held at the home of Ann Petta on October 14th at 7:00 PM. All members were present. This meeting was to discuss the Art Show planned for November 3rd, Sunday afternoon from 1-4 PM. ,Justin Case, a local artist and carpenter, was present and offered to help the Committee with the show. It was agreed to give Mr. Case a budge.of $150.00 to build portable display panels for the paintings. Each displayer will have a 4' x 4' space. As of today, there are 21 artists and 2 more possible who are going to be in the show. The committee will try to set up as much as possible on Saturday afternoon. Mr. Case will be donating all of his time. Hannah will purchase a Guest Book and programs will be prepared as soon as all paintings are numbered, etc. It was agreed unanimously that this show will be "art" only. We will plan for a musical affair some time in the future for those people who responded with music as their interest. All participants will be asked to bring in their paintings on Saturday afternoon. Barbara Bayus will call the city attorney concerning a waiver for art left in the building over night. The committee will meet at the Community Room on Sunday about two hours before the show for any last minute preparations. The meeting was adjourned at 8.30 PM. Respectfully submitted, 41-14 Hannah Laister, Secretary vember 21, 1985 Council Ager� ,t, ,Ve�nU :1 IF CITY OF GRAND TERRACE II�� t ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1985 U';v G `AND rLERR 1C MINUTES c October 1, 1985 The meeting of the Grand Terrace Economic Development Committee was called to order at 6 35 p m by Doug Erway, Vice Chairman, in the upstairs conference room of the Civic Center on October 1, 1985 PRESENT Doug Erway, Joe Borrielli, Jerry Hawkinson, Barbara Pfennighausen and Tom Schwab ABSENT. Jim Rigley and Bud Howell The Minutes were approved as written by a unanimous vote Jerry Hawkinson asked how the Chamber was progressing on the Grand Terrace promotional brochure Dour Erway responded that the first Chamber promotional piece would be a new City Map The map will be current and will contain advertising It should be out by the first of the year He didn't feel that help in funding would be required for this project The formal promotional packet has been delayed because we lack good reproducible pictures of the Civic Center and the fire station Doug will be taking more pictures and the project can get under way Barbara reported that Byron Matteson's resignation had been submitted and had been acted on by the Council at its last meeting As a result of his resignation from the committee, there is a vacancy Concern was expressed that due to an over ambitious realtor's actions, land assembly for the proposed shopping center on Barton Road may be hampered, thus delaying the proj ect's progress The committee felt that there was nothing official they could do about the problem Barbara is to keep in touch with Tom Lenny, of Hopkins Development Company, and invite him to meet with the committee if he would like to make a progress report Doug reported that he had received no response from Anderson's and that it appeared that they were not interested in locating in Grand Terrace Jerry reported that he had not heard from Dennis Cordoza since our last meeting, but he had heard from several sources that prospective developers had expressed concerr for the lack of accessibility of Commerce Way A True Value class hardware store is still viable for us, but Jerry's interest in management of such a facility is waning Barbara suggested that Hopkins Dev Co be made aware of True Value's interest in locating in the Terrace -2- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES 10/1/85 planning, it was agreed, for transitioning between Barton Road developments was considered by the committee a necessity Uniqueness in design and creativity within the Commercial Zones should be emphasized Standards for development should be for- mulated and put in the form of a check list for use by prosptecive developers, to simplify and speed up the approval process The meeting was adjourned at 7 25 p m The next meeting will be November 5, 1985 Respectfully submitted, Barbara Pfennighausen, Secretary Approved ate November 19, 1985 STAFF 12 08 3107 1L-U5 LLUU C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( x) MEETING DATE- November 21, 1985 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of School Impaction Fees 1::010ING RECU I?ED NO RIND I.NG REQUIRED x On November 18, 1985 a meeting was held between Councilwoman Barbara Pfennighausen, Seth Armstead, Alex Estrada, Mr. and Mrs. Jay Wilson and Jim McGYvern. At that meeting Mr. Wilson requested that the City Council waive the School Impaction Fees since he orginally applied for a Building Permit on June 6, 1985. The plans submitted by Mr. Wilson were inadequate and had to be revised and resubmitted to meet the mininum Uniform Building Code Standards. The Building Permit was not issued until October 14, 1985 after the City Council had approved the School Impaction fees on September 12, 1985. It was agreed at the November 18, 1985 meeting, that the School Impaction Fees should be waived. According to the City Attorney the City Council may waive the School Impaction Fees pursuant to staff's recommendations. Staff recommends that City Council: 1. REVIEW EACH SCHOOL IMPACTION FEE WAIVER REQUEST ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. 2. GRANT A WAIVER OF SCHOOL IMPACTION FEES WHERE PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES AND UNNECESSRY HARDSHIP RESULT FROM THE STRICT APPLICATION OF ORDINANCE 54. 3. GRANT WAIVER OF SCHOOL IMPACTION FEES SUBJECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS AS WILL ASSURE THAT THE ADJUSTMENT THEREBY AUTHORIZED SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LIMITATIONS UPON OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND DISTRICT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. 4. DETERMINE THAT BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES APPLICABLE TO SUBJECT PROPERTY, INCLUDING SIZE, SLOPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION OR SURROUNDINGS, THE STRICT APPLICATION OF ORDINANCE 54 IS FOUND TO DEPRIVE SUBJECT PROPERTY OF PRIVILEGES ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IDENTICAL ZONE CLASSFICATIONS. T -SJ F F EPOFt-T November 13, 1985 f R 12-1 1037 , 12-8 5027 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X } K ETING DATE- November 21, 1985 45 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7A SUBJECT: Mr Roy O Roberts - Reference Tract 11450 `Y-'31NG Rc,QJi:)-cD 10 " iC:',G REQU i QED XX Tract 11450 is a one acre condominium tract located on Preston Street, north of Palm Avenue. The City Council, at it's October 17, 1985 meeting, voted to re3ect any further time extensions for the pro3ect, which was originally approved in August, 1980. Mr. Roy Roberts, owner of the property, has requested time on your agenda of November 21, 1985, to address the Council. JK/JS/lh r I� RECEIVED AT NOV O7 i�'Cf5 November 5, 1985 KICAK & A&WCIAFES Mr. Seth Armstead, City Manager City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 Dear Mr. Armstead, Subject: Tract �F11A extension Approval Thank you for the letter of November 1st. from your i%r. Shone. After re -reading my letter of October 28 to you, I can see that there is an apparent misunder- standing. I did not and do not think that anyone but City Coun- cil can take action on the above matter, and as I said in the third paragraph of my letter, I hope they will be disposed to grant our request just as soon as possible. Perhaps in my enthusiasm, I did'nt iNord this letter as well as possible. Further, as we agreed, I delivered a copy of the signed agreement with the Kesters to your office on Friday. Also, most of the members of the Council have kindly given me time to explain our position, and I believe this and 'the agreericnt will help. I really do a-preciate your cooperation and help in this -utter, and I certainly regret my misunder- standing. Sinc9rely n Roy C. Roberts 5871 Argyle �,ay Riverside, California cc: John R. Shone } INFORMA N CONY =IJ NiSNED TO 3,UO 2 �czo oer 28, 1 j05 r. Se-,", ;rmstead, C2. vy _ anaoer C zt•r c i u rand per- ac e 2�';^:5 ) - =oad Grand 2er=ace, California >252-,-5295 RECEIVED AT NOV 0A ''85 KICAK & ASM#FVED 41 ' Js` Q'RAND TcRRA,'L Dear Mr. A stead, Subj Tract ;11450 3stenszon inreal Confirming our conversation of this aite_noon on the Subject, you indicated that tr_ere shoald be no problem in proceeding with this project as requested. You indicated tnav .he Council was not informed that the legal ma-cters between zhe Keszers and our- selves hasbeen settled, even enough the Ci zy Attor- ney was given this information by my attorney, iir. ,golf. tie documents are being mailed 'pack and foruh fo= final siona-.zres. So -.,hat re may be sTared further el:pense anal anxiety, 1 -iill appreciate your confirmavion of our extension ac your earlies c convenience* I ernaps Zae City Coun- cil will be disposed to grant our request az their meeting of November 7y'—.' if not, our a_ = eal at the meeting of November 21st. will be necessary of course. trllsti that ,h_s matter Can be resolved by_properly infc�ing City Council of our settlement, as sho.z=d have been do -e, aad u1nat re - a—r -proceed vl Chou � fur- ther deg P7. -Z1cr = --cu for yo,-I= cJo .bra vlhl on in �s - -,az,ue _cf=coerts rate: ST)-,.FF REPO[ November 13, 1985 xT 12.49 R A ITEM ) COUNCIL ITEM ( xx) METING DATE: November 21, 1985 ►GENDA ITEM NO. 8A IUBJECT: Traffic Signals Barton Road and Mt Vernon Avenue UNOING REQUIRED xx 0RE'QU IRED The City Council at the meeting of November 7, 1985, requested clarification of the memo from Joseph Kicak, City Engineer, to Seth Armstead, City Manager, concerning the Traffic Signal improvements proposed at Mt Vernon and Barton Road. The current City budget contains $48,000.00 to install left turn arrows for traffic on Barton Road. At the time of budget preparation, we were not aware of the right-of-way problem at the northwest corner of the intersection. The cost of the signal may increase, because of the need to acquire additional property. RECOMMENDATION- THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE AN APPRAISAL OF THE PROPERTY, SO STAFF CAN REPORT BACK IF ADDITIONAL FUNDS ARE NEEDED. JK/JS/lh CRAITEM( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. "ate- AREPORT November 13, 1985 COUNCIL ITEM jkX ) MEETING DATE: I November 21, 1985 SUBJECT: Street Lights at Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. =UNOING REQUIRED XX '0 = JNC I.NG REQUIRED At your last meeting you instructed Staff to bring to the November 21, 1985 meeting, information on the cost of providing street lights on Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. Since there were only two working days between your last meeting and the agenda deadline for the next meeting, there was not sufficient time to prepare a detailed report. However, the following information may be adequate for you to decide if you wish to proceed with a street lighting pro3ect. BARTON ROAD, Michigan Street to Glendora Drive This estimate is based on using 9500 lumen lights spaced at 300 ft on both sides of the street with 22,000 lm lights at Canal Street, Palm Avenue and Honey Hill Drive. 52 9500 lm lights @ 10.65/Mo = $553.80/ Mo 3 22000 lm. lights @ 14.10/Mo = $ 42 30/ Mo. $596.10/Mo. If ornamental poles are required, add an initial cost of $381 00 per pole, or $20,955.00 MT. VERNON AVENUE Grand Terrace Rd to Main Street 44 9500 lm. lights @ 10.65/Mo = $468.60/Mo. 6 22000 lm lights @ 14.10/Mo = $ 84.60/Mo. $553.20/Mo 553.20 X 12 = $6,638 40 per year If ornamental poles are desired add $381 00/pole, or 50 X 381 = $19,050.00 Light cost for both streets = 7153 + 6638 = $13,797.00 per year The above costs are based on a Street Light spacing of 300 feet on both sides of the street As a practical matter the lights would have to be placed on existing Edison poles that were suitable for street lights, and the actual cost would vary depending upon the actual number of lights to be installed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IF THE CITY COUNCIL DESIRES TO PROCEED WITH A STREET LIGHTING PROGRAM, INSTRUCT STAFF TO WORK WITH THE EDISON COMPANY TO PREPARE A DETAILED PLAN OF STREET LIGHTS WITH THE COST TO BE CONSIDERED AS A BUDGET ITEM FOR NEXT YEAR. I JK/JS/lh ME-RORANDIJM TO Council DATE: 11/14/85 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 8B (FYI FROM Ilene Dughman, City Clerk SUBJECT: Engineering Report, Landscaping and Lighting District 83-1 I have provided the subject Report excluding Exhibit "B", "Assessments", denoting the assessment amounts by parcel ($1.73 or $17.25). The complete Report is available in the Reading Box. Enclosure ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 83-1 CITY of GRAND TERRACE FISCAL YEAR 1983-1984 Prepared by KICAK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineers Grand Terrace, California 92324 INDEX Page I. PURPOSE ------------------------ 1 II. FINDINGS ----------------------- 1 III. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ------------- 4 IV. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ----------- 4 Name--------------------------- 5 Boundary ----------------------- 5 Facilities --------------------- 5 Benefit Analysis --------------- 5,6 V. SUMMARY ------------------------ 7 Exhibit A - Schedule No. LS-1 Schedule No. LS-2 Exhibit B - Assessments Exhibit C - Plans and Diagrams ENGINEER'S REPORT for GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 83-1 for the Fiscal year 1983-1984 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis for the Grand Terrace Landscaping and Street Lighting District No. 83-1 for the 1983-1984 fiscal year. This district, utilizing direct benefit assessments, is proposed to finance the cost of providing maintenance and operation of a street lighting system in the City of Grand Terrace. II. FINDINGS Since the incorporation, the costs of providing street lighting in the City were financed from General Fund revenues. The cost of street lighting operation has sharply accelerated in recent years due to heavy increases in the cost of electrical energy. Most power generated by the Southern California Edison Company is from fossil fuels, either petroleum or natural gas. These costs have been rising continuously. The City of Grand Terrace, in coopera- tion with SCE, has taken steps to reduce costs of operating the street lighting system. In 1981, mercury vapor lamps have been converted to high pressure sodium vapor lamps which can deliver equivalent illumination with up to 40% savings in electric energy consumption compared to mercury vapor lamps. All new installations in the City are required to be high pressure sodium vapor. -1- Adequate street lighting is considered very desirable for its contribution to public convenience and safety. Prevention of crime, protection of property, and reduction of traffic accidents are specific benefits that the citizens of the City of Grand Terrace experience through operation and maintenance of a well designed street lighting system. Prior to incorporation of the City of Grand Terrace, and while under the 3urisdiction of San Bernardino County, due to increased costs of energy, the county eliminated the requirement of the installation of street lighting on the interior street system within the new subdivisions. Therefore, in certain areas, the spacing of street lighting is quite sub -standard. It must be realized that these proceedings are not for _ the purpose of installing additional lighting where required, but rather to pay for the maintenance and energy costs for the existing street lighting. Installation of additional street lighting standards should be undertaken under separate proceedings. The assessments under these proceedings take into consideration the adequacy of existing street lighting and assess the properties within the assessment district only for the benefit derived by the property which results from this lighting. The street lighting system within the City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Street Lighting District 83-1 consists of 211 street lights of various intensity; 206 of these lights are owned by Southern California Edison Company. The energy charges, therefore, are payable to SCE under Schedule No. LS-1 and LS-2 Decision No. 82-11-086, 82-12-055, 82-12-057 and 82-12-115 of the California Public Utilities Commission, effective date February 2, 1983. -2- Five of these lights are owned by the City of Grand Terrace. The energy costs, therefore, are payable to SCE under Schedule No. LS-2 pursuant to the decision number and the effective date stated above. The following is the schedule of street lights by quantity, lumens and the type: No. Lumens Type Owner 55 5800 HPSV Southern California Edison 7 7900 MVM Southern California Edison 142 9500 HPSV Southern California Edison 2 22000 HPSV Southern California Edison 5 22000 HPSV City of Grand Terrace The cost of energy and the maintenance of the street lighting system can be funded through direct benefit assessments pur- suant to Landscaping and Lighting 1972 Act. The City of Grand Terrace, as are other cities, is facing an extremely difficult financial situation. Proposition 13 and the Gann Initiative sharply limit the ability of local governments to raise revenues for public programs and places them = a posi- tion of greater dependency on state and federal governments for sources of revenue. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establish- ment of Assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include mainten- ance and operation of street lights and landscaping. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: -3- "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improve- ments, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (S & H S22547). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." III_ FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. The latter can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing and all other costs identified with the district proceedings. The following costs are estimated and are included in the benefit assessments for the Fiscal Year 1983-1984: 1. Operation & maintenance 2. Engineering, legal, admini- stration, mailing, and other incidental expenses 3. County Tax Collector charges Total Cost Less City's Contribution Amount to be Assessed IV. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS $24,698.00 9,800.00 3,083.00 $37,581.00 13,500.00 $24,OS1.00 A. Name The district is entitled, "Landscaping and Street Lighting District No. 83-11', City of Grand Terrace. -4- B. Boundary The boundaries of the proposed assessment district include all parcels of property within the existing city limits of the City of Grand Terrace. All parcels identified in the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's Maps being within the City of Grand Terrace are included within the Assess- ment District. C. Facilities The facilities or improvements are defined as street light standards, their appurtenances, energy and maintenance costs to operate these facilities. D. Benefit Analysis The assessments proposed under these proceedings include those properties which receive benefit from the street lighting. Certain of those parcels receive limited benefit and, therefore, the assessments are reduced accordingly. Recognizing that certain parcels in the City do not have street lighting, these parcels generally benefit from the street lighting along the arterial and major street system within the City. The City has contributed $13,500 toward offsetting these costs and decreasing the assessment for all properties within the assessment district. The basis of assessment on these properties was as follows: 1. The properties within the District which have street lighting facilities, which by the standards would be considered sufficient to meet the recommended lighting standards have been assessed one unit of benefit. 2•10 2. The developed properties within the district which have only intersection lighting or no lighting and the undeveloped large acreage within tentative maps filed which have access to publicly lighted right-of- way, however, has not yet been developed, has been asssessed one -tenth of one unit of assessment. 3. A parcel which is part of a tentative map filed, however, is landlocked whereby it has no access to public lighted right-of-way has been assessed zero (0) units. Based on the above assessment formula, and a total of 3083 assessment parcels, the following is the breakdown by the three categories of assessment: 1. There are 1209 parcels within category 1 which have been assessed a full unit of assessment. 2. There are 1874 units within category 2 which have been assessed one -tenth (0.1) of one unit of assessment. 3. There are several parcels which are landlocked and these have not been assessed, or received zero assessment. The cumulative total of assessable units based on the formula and the total number of parcels provides a total of 1396.4 units of benefit within the boundaries of Assessment District. Considering the costs of setting up the initial district, the cost of operation and maintenance for the fiscal year 1983-1984, and subtracting the City's contribution, the net costs of $24,081 divided by the total assessable units of 1396.4 yields a per unit cost of $17.25. MM V. SUMMARY The individual assessments for each parcel within the City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting District No. 83-1 are contained on a list of proposed assessments entitled Exhibit B which shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace. Joseph Kicak, City Engineer Kicak & Associates, Inc. Registered Civil Engineer 21775 June 21, 1983 -7- EXHIBIT A Schedule No. LS-1 Schedule No. LS-2 rA SOUTHERN CALlFORIAA El N COMPANY 2244 walnut Grow wxis Pmernead, CaRforna 91770 R wed Cal, PUC Sheet No. 7159-E cuwam&ARevibsedd CAL PUS Sheet No 7092-E SslmcW& III. LS-1 LIGHTING - STREET An MIGMT tITILITT-CiiiiED, STSTDI AMLICABILM Applicable to street and highway lighting service where the Company owns and maintains the street lighting equipment. TERRITORT Within the entire territory served. RATES liminal Rating kWh Per Maat1 Per Gaop Per Moetk Average Al I midaiju W Ali Enera Law Initiel Night Equivaleit Right eertaileesI iiattan Lis Service Service Strum Service Nidalot or ac es Equivalent Charge Iscandescest Lamps * 103 1,000 37 18 S 5.59 S 4.29 $2.30 202 2,500 72 36 8.41 6.08 3.05 327 4,000 116 59 11.23 7.47 2.85 448 6,000 159 80 14.32 9.11 3.05 690 10,000 245 124 20.54 12.50 3.35 Mercury Vapor Lamm 100 4,000 47 24 S 8.95 S 7.22 SS.10 175 71900 77 39 10.66 8.05 5.10 250 12,000 107 54 13.12 9.65 5.75 400 21,000 168 85 16.88 11.68 6.05 700 41,000 285 144 24.70 15.91 6.40 11000 55,000 403 204 32.52 19.88 6.45 High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lumps 50 4,000 21 11 S 8.05 S 7.0A $5.25 70 51800 31 15 8.75 7.36 5.35 100 91500 48 24 9.89 8.05 5.50 ISO 16,000 68 34 11.64 9.17 6.00 200 22,000 90 45 13.23 10.15 6.35 250 27.500 112 56 14.62 10.86 6.40 400 50,000 173 88 18.43 13.05 6.70 * Closed to new installations. The above rates are subject to the Steel Surcharge Adjustment as set forth in Special Condition No. 10. For service on Santa Catalina Island, the above rates are subject to the Catalina Energy Cost Balance Adjustment, as set forth in Special Condition ilo. 9. The above Rates include tin follomrial Rat& Canpeaosts. (Ceetiseed) Cue be evened .%`, -iffy) Advise Loser No 605-E bnod bi Edward A Myers. Jr rra be wMaw by CaL r m+ -; Due Filed Janua rY 7 . 1983 Effecnve February 2. 1983 Decason No Vice President SOUTHERN CALFORNIA )l COMPANY 2244 WakvA Grc.o „fenue Rosemead, CaRfortua 91770 LStd Cal PUG Sleet No, 709 3 - E 07 -E s Cancelluyg Revised CaL PUG Sheet No 7 0 1 7 - E Schedule No. LS-1 LIQMN6 - STREET AM HI2W UMM-OWAED SYSTEM (Continued) RATE CO POAEIfiS ease Rates: Nominal Lwo RRaatin kWh Per HDnth Per Low Per Month - Xverage Lamp Initial All Midnight -or Right Equivalent All Night Energy Curtailment Wattage Lumens Service Service Service Service Pnonight or Facilities Equivalent Charge Iscandesctet Laps • 103 1.000 37 18 S 4.10 S 3 56 S2 30 202 2,500 72 36 5.50 4.63 3.05 327 4,000 116 59 6.55 5.09 2.85 448 6,000 159 80 7.90 5.88 3.05 690 10,000 245 124 10.65 7.50 3.35 Mercury vapor Lamps 100 4,000 47 24 S 7.05 S 6.25 55.10 175 7,900 77 39 7.55 6.48 5.10 250 12,000 107 54 8.80 7.47 5.75 400 21,000 168 85 10.10 8.25 6.05 700 41.000 285 144 13.20 10.10 6.40 1.000 55.000 403 204 16.25 11.65 6.45 High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lags 50 4.00o 21 11 S 7.20 S 6.60 $5 25 70 5,800 31 15 7.50 6.75 5.35 100 9,500 48 24 7.95 7.08 5.50 150 16,000 68 34 8.90 7.80 6 00 200 22,000 90 45 9.60 8.33 6.35 250 27.500 112 56 10.10 8.60 6.40 400 50,000 173 88 11.45 9.50 6.70 • Closed to new installations. Per tiff Adjustnant Rates: Electric Revenue Adjustment Billing Factor ......................................... 0 000e Energy Cost Adjustment Billing Factor ................................................ 3 756t .. . . ....... .. . Annual Energy Rate ........ .. ... .. ................................... 0.253f Conservation Load Management Adjustment Billing Factor .............................. 0 O271 Total Adjustment Rates .............................................................. 4.036L The Adjustment Rates are described in Parts C. I. and 3 of the Preliminary Statement. (Coatin"d) (ra be awned by anhp) r»a " Advice Letter No 6 0 4 - E Edward A. Myers. It ..aee 82-11-086, 82-1,) -055, Decmm No. 82-12-057 S 82-'2-115 Vice President %sw as ens..7.� • �' Date Filed December 30, 1982_ ggft.tm January 1, 1983 Resolunon No 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rcaenwad, Cakfon 1770 ne_I 5�_GI P U G shee. No 7094-F 7037-E s Cuxellmg s e d Cal P U C Sheer No SARI - F SPECIAL COMMONS scbelkla ft. LS-1 L I CKT I NG - STIM AM IQ QMAT UTnm-UM" STSTei (Ceanise d) . I. Standard Installation: The above rates are based upon a standard overhead installation where the Company furnishes bracket or mast arm construction attached to wood poles with service supplied from overhead lines. 2. Other TAan SUMard Installatimr: a. where the applicant requests the installation of other than a standard installation and his request is acceptable to the Company, the Company will install the requested equipment provided the applicant agrees to advance the estimated difference in cost installed between such equipment and a standard overhead installation. If. in the opinion of the Company, an existing wood pole could be utilized for said installation, the difference in cost installed shall include no allowance for a wood pole. For an underground service installation, cost installed shall include, but is not limited to, the cost of any necessary conduit, excavating, backfiiling and restoring of the pavement in accordance with the Company's specifications. b. Advances made for other than a standard installation will not be refunded. C. All facilities installed shall become and remain the sole property of the Company. _. Bars of Service: Under the Company's standard all night operating schedule approximately 4,140 nouns aw service per year will be furnished. Under the Company's midnight or equivalent service operating schedule approximately 2,090 hours of service per year will be furnished. 4. Energy Curtailee d Service: a. Where the customer requests the installation and/or removal of equipment in order to obtain Energy Curtailment Service and such request is acceptable to the Company. the Company will comply with such request provided the customer first agrees to pay to the Company the estimated cost Installed of any additional equipment required and/or the -emoval cost of equipment currently installed. Such payments will not be refunded and shhall be paid In advance or in installments acceptable to the Company over a period not to exceed three years. Facilities installed in connection with such requests become and remain the sole property of the Company. b.=acilities charges shall be applicable under this schedule when the Company has been requested to discontinue the existing service by the customer and the customer has stioulated that the facilities are to be left in place for future use. (To be me d by .ul") Advice Leger No 60 4 - E 8 - - Decwon No 82-12-115 (Curtieved) hs"d by Edward A Myers, it NSM Vice President Tick I. Dt rMffi. M WN r V -1 Due Fried December 30, 1982 Efiectme January 1. 1983 Resoiutm No SOUTHERN CALFOAMA Er"I" COMPANY 2244 WakM Grov Kwe P ernsad, Caldon— _ j770 R- sed Cal P U C Sheet No 7095-E -` 5881-E, 2-E S Cancelling Revised Cal P U C Sheet No 70 2- E SKCIAWL COMMONS (Continoed) Sdw&le ■o. LS-1 LIWiMOG - STREET AM HIGH &y WITRM-CI#WfD I (Continued) S. Removal. Relocation or libdification of Facilities: a. Where street lighting service and facilities are ordered removed by a customer and such facilities, or any part thereof, were in service for a period of less than 36 consecutive months, the customer shall pay to the Company a nonrefundable amount equal to the total estimated cost installed less any customer contribution, plus the estimated cost of removal less the estimated salvage of the facilities. b. Where street lighting service and facilities were ordered removed or modified by a customer and such service and facilities, or their equivalent, are ordered reinstalled within 36 months from the date of the order to remove or to modify, the customer shall pay to the Company, in advarLe of the reinstallation, a nonrefundable amount equal to the cost of removal or modification of the prior facilities and the estimated cost of such reinstallation. c. Where street lighting facilities are ordered modified and/or relocated by a customer, the customer shall pay to the Company, in advance of such modification and/or relocation, a nonrefundable amount equal to the estimated cost of such modification and/or relocation. This includes facilities that now, serve street light load only, but that may have been installed originally to serve other than street light load. d. Facilities removed or installed remain the sole property of the Company. 6. Aegviresents and Restrictions: a. The applicant for street light service shall specify the type of service, lamp size, and location of street lights. b. Service shall not be furnished under this schedule where location, mounting height, and/or other considerations are unacceptable to the Company. e. The installation of street lighting equipment and facilities hereinunder is contingent upon the Company obtaining easements, rights of way, and highway permits satisfactory to the Company for the required poles, lines, equipment. and facilities. d. In accordance with Rule No. 4, a written contract for a term of not less than one year and not more than five years is required in order to receive street light service under the provisions of this schedule. !. Should the applicant not coffrtence using the street lighting in a bona fide manner within ninety (90) days after date of completion and installation of a street light or street lighting system requested by the applicant, the Company will bill, and the applicant shall pay, the applicable facilities charge(s). (To be nsf¢I by WA") Advice Lma No 604-E 81-12-055 Decmm No. 82-12-115 (Continale+d) wmd by Edward A. Myersz_ Ir ITakomit iyCal TLU Date Filed December 30, 1982 iAem, January 1, 1983 Vice President Txk Resolution No vised C*L P U C sheet No. 7160—E SOUTHERN CALFORMA SON COMPANY 22" WaKA Or Avermie Rosemead. CaMortxa 91770 SPECIAL COEDMONS (Continued) Cancelling Revised_CAL PL1.0 Sheet Nm- 7p96— Sdwble ft. LS4 LIGIMIG - STREET AID KrGWAT 1lTTLM-w"I STSTEN (Continued) 7. Maintenance: The Company shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its street light facilities Where the Company experiences, or expects to experience, maintenance costs exceeding its normal maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to, vandalism. the Company may require the customer to pay the excess maintenance expense. S. liability of Coapan3r. The Company shall not, by taking action pursuant to its tariffs, be liable for any loss, damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may result, or be claimed to result, therefrom. 9. Catalina Energy Cost Ealme Adjustment: For service on Santa Catalina Island, the rates above are subject to adjustment as provided for in Part 6 of the Preliminary Statement, at a billing factor of 2.59311 per kWh. 10. Steel Surcharge Adjusta n : The rates above are subject to adjustment as provided in Part X of the Preliminary Statement, at a billing factor of 0.000d per kWh. fro be 6� 5 E Advxe Letter No Deco= No bmW by fro be - by CGL rur-) Edward A Myers, Ir Due Filed January 7. 1983 Effector February 2. 1983 Vice President Resolutm No E-1961 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA __ 30N COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grown Avenue Rosemead. Cafifornu 91770 Revised C&L PUC- Shm No 7161—E Caacen= Revised CAL PUC Slxet No. 7097—E Schedui* ft. L3-2 Li6NTIPM - STREET AM MIGMY CUS W2-GORED I1dTALUTIOl1 UAETERED SERVICE APPLICAAILITY Applicable to service for the lighting of streets, highways, other public thoroughfares, and publicly -owned and publicly -operated automobile parking lots which are open to the general public. where the customer owns the street lighting equipment, and the service is unmetered. TERRITORY Within the entire territory served. RATES Per kV of Lamp Load s per Rath Type of Service: All Right Service Multiple Installation ......................................... $31.24 Series Installation .................................... 40.6S Midnight or Equivalent Service Multiple Installation ......................................... $19.1s Series Installation......................................a... 22.72 The above rates are subject to the Steel Surcharge Adjustment as set forth in Special Condition No. 12. For service on Santa Catalina Island, the above rates are subject to the Catalina Energy Cost Balance Adjustment. as set forth in Special Condition No. 11. * Lamp load shall be determined in accordance with Special Condition Nos. 8 and 9 below. The above Rates include the following Rate Coopo&ents. RATE COMPONENTS Bass Rates: Type of Service: All Night Service Per kV of Lmp Lead ! Per Month Multiple Installation....... 0............................ $16.90 Series Installation................0................ 22.00 Midnight or Equivalent Service Multiple Installation .................................... $11.90 Series Installation—, .... * ...... 9....................... 13.30 * Lamp load shall be determined in accordance with Special Condition Mos. 8 and 9 below. (ro be rmmd by udryl Advice Letter No 605 —E (Continued) 60ma Edward Um_ yers, Jr (To be mutt by Cal T LC) Due Fled January 7, 1983 Decision No Effective February 2. 1987 SOUTHERN CALFORNIA E DISON MPANY Rev i sei Cal, P U C. Sheer No 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Ro"cr"d. CaNforna 91770 Cancellm6Rev i red Cal PUG Sheer No Ap78_F Schedule lid. LS-2 LISH TrING - STREET AND HIGMY CUS1 IR-OrWD IIMTXLATIiW WINEiERED SERVICE (Continow) RATE C3P0WEIIT5 (Cortinoed) Per kWh ** Adjtstrmt Rates: Electric Revenue Adjustment Billing Factor ....... ............................ 0 OOOt Energy Cost Adjustment Billing Factor ......................................... 3 756t Annual Energy Rate ................... .... . . .... ........... ........... 0 253t Conservation Load Management Adjustment Billing Factor ........................ .Q027t Total Adjustment Rates ........................................................ 4.0369 ++ The applicable kWh shall be determined in accordance with Special Condition No. 10 below. The Adjustment Rates are described in Parts 6, I, and J of the Preliminary Statement. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Orr+ership of Facilities: a. For multiple systems the Company will deliver service at 120, 120/240 volts, or, at the option of the Company, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single phase. For existing series systems the Company will furnish and maintain constant current regulating transformers and deliver service at the secondary side of such transformers. b. The customer will furnish and maintain all utilization equipment beyond the point of delivery except for optional maintenance service provided by the Company in accordance with Schedule No. LS-4. C. New or modified installations normally shall be multiple service installations. New or modified series installations shall be made only where, in the opinion of the Company, it is practical to supply series service. d. For new or codified series installations requiring a new constant current regulating transformer, the customer shall furnish and maintain the transformer; and service will be delivered at the primary side of the transformer. 2. Switching Facilities: For all night or midnight service under the Company's standard operating schedules, the Company will furnish, maintain, and operate the necessary switching facilities. Service for other operating schedules is not available under this schedule. 3. Iftins of Service: Under the Company's standard all night operating schedule approximately 4.140 hours of service per year will be furnished, and under the Company's standard midnight operating schedule approximately 2.040 hours of service per year will be furnished. (Continued) (ro be by Ely) `m W bs rro be om to b) Cal. F L.C1 Advise Letter No 604_E Edgard A- Myers, If Due F"ded December 30, 1982 82-11-086, 82-12-055. January1, 1983 Decam No. 82-12-057 b 82-12-115 e Vice President November 13, 1985 ST*,m`*F � 412 353 R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( Xj METING OAT November 21, 1985 �ENDA ITEM NO. 8B ( 2 ) JBJECT• f • 1972 Landscaping and Street Lighting Act Assessment District 1NJING REQUIRED XX ) =,'PlCING REQUIRED ~�6` Attached, for your information, is a copy of the report which was prepared for the Landscaping and Street Lighting District within the City of Grand Terrace. If the City Council wishes to reenact such a district, the present report would require updating of all the new property ownerships and a spread of the assessments based on the current energy costs, and the current subdivisions of the parcels, which were not subdivided at the time that this report was prepared. In addition, a confirmation of 72 Landscaping and Street Lighting District throughout the whole city, such as the one which was proposed in 1983, would give the citizens, as well as, the City Council an opportunity to install additional street lights for which the energy would be paid for, based on benefit, by those property owners who benefit from such additional street lighting. It is imperative to recognize that the installation of additional street lights would not be done under the provisions of the*72 Landscaping and Street Lighting District. However, it could be done on a pay-as-you-go basis, if the property owners were willing to pay the out-of-pocket cash at the time the street lights were installed Or, at the request of the property owners, the City Council could initiate an improvement district pursuant to the 1913 Act, and issue bonds pursuant to 1915 Act for the payments of the ;Capital Improvement over a period of time. Please be advised that an annual report must be prepared and submitted to the County Tax Collector for the City to'be able to recover the costs of the street lighting energy (costs) annually The estimated cost for the preparation of \the necessary maps, reports, and assessment spread for the 1972 Landscaping,and Lighting District is estimated to be less than $9,000.00. This is based on the experience, which we have had with the Assessment Districts in the past \and depending on the number of changes that occurred since the last report was prepared, the cost will vary, however, should not exceed the estimated $9,000 00 JK/lh I