The URL can be used to link to this page

05-22-1986Y- CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road May 22, 1986 5.30 P.M. Call to Order Invocation - Pastor Suk Woo Chung, Loma Linda Korean Church of Seventh Day Adventist Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Staf f CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Recommendations 1. Approval of Minutes ( 5/8/86 ) Approve 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA052286 Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADJOURNED JOINT REGULARCRA I Y COUNCIL MEETING MAY 29, AT 5 30 P.M. TO CONDUCT- G STUDY SESSIONS CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Add/Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Introduction - Don Banghart, Fire Chief, & Glenn Newman, San Bernardino County Fire Warden, California Department of Forestry B. CDF Film Presentation - Mexico Earthquake 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council M me b6r, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A Approve Check Register No. 052286 Approve B. Ratify 5/22/86 CRA Action Approve C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda Approve Council Action PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE COUNTER COPY _ FROM LIBRARY COUNTER THANK YOUI COUNCIL AGENDA Staff 5/22/86 - Page 2 of 3 Recommendations D. Approve 5/8/86 Minutes f Approve E. Authorize Release of Sewer & Roadway Approve Improvement Bond #SB-4249 - Tract #10392 F. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 44, THE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY BOND LAW OF 1986 G. Approve & Authorize Mayor to Execute Approve Agreement for Construction Testing Services Vivienda Avenue Bridge Project (GTC 86-03) with C.H.J Incorporated in the amount of $3,300.00 H. (1) Re -Classify (2) Part -Time Account Clerk Approve positions to (2) Part -Time Receptionists & Adjust Salary (2) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 & ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATIONS & SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. 14. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 15. ORAL REPORTS A. Planning Commission (1) Planning Commission Membership/ Recruitment (2) Accept Resignation of John McDowell B. Parks & Recreation Committee C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee D. Crime Prevention Committee (1) Consider Appointment of Thomas Semph to fill the unexpired term of Larry Williams to expire 6/30/88 (2) Consider Appointment of Laurie Payce to fill the unexpired term of Susan Crawford to expire 6/30/88 E. Emergency Operations Committee F. Economic Development Adhoc Committee G. Chamber of Commerce Council Action COUNCIL AGENDA Staff 5/22/86 - Page 3 of 3 Recommendations Council Action H. Police Chief I. Fire Chief J. City Engineer K. City Attorney L. City Manager M. City Council 6. PUBLIC HEARING - 7 00 P.M A. R-1 Hillside Overlay for Undeveloped Proper- ties Located Northerly of Main St., Easterly of Oriole, & an R-1 PUD Overlay on the East Slope of Blue Mountain 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Adopt OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, REQUESTING THE ESTAB- LISHMENT OF A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE) IN SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTIES THROUGH THE IMPLEMEN- TATION OF SB 1199, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2550 OF THE STREET & HIGHWAYS CODE ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL TO ADJOURNED JOINT REGULAR CONDUCTTO - N ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, JUNE 12, 1986, AT 5 30 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 6/12/86 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12 00 NOON ON 6/4/86 rENDING CRA APPROVAL. Y CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - MAY 8, 1986 MAY 2 2 10 iF AGENDA 1SETdi NO. The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on May 8, 1986, at 5 38 p.m. PRESENT Hugh J Grant, Chairman Byron Matteson, Vice Chairman Tony Petta Barbara Pfennighausen Seth Armstead, Executive Director Thomas J. Schwab, Treasurer John Harper, Acting Attorney Alicia Chavez, Acting Secretary ABSENT Dennis Evans Ilene Dughman, City Clerk Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney APPROVAL OF MINUTES (4/24/86) CRA-86-20 Motion by Mrs Pfennighausen, Second by Vice Chairman Matteson, ALL AYES, by all present, to approve the Minutes of April 24, 1986. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA050886 CRA-86-21 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Mrs. Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, by all present, to approve Check Register No CRA050886, as presented Adjourned at 5 40 p m meeting, May 14, 1986, Study Session to an Adjourned Regular Joint CRA/City Council at 5 30 p m , to conduct a FY 1986-87 Budget Respectfully submitted, ecretary APPROVED Chairman Page 1 - CRA - (5/8/86) PENDING CRA APPROVAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE MAY 22, 1986 MAY 2 2 1986 CRA AGENDA ITETA NO oL. CHECK REGISTER NO CRA052286 CHECK NUMBER OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF MAY 22. 1986 (1) P4522 KICAK & ASSOCIATES ENG SERVICES FOR VIVIENDA BRIDGE 4/7-5/4/86 $1,471 75 (2) 15837 WOLFF/LANG/CHRISTOPHER FINAL PAYMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES ON CIVIC CENTER 2,189 10 (3) 15845 BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. PAYMENT #1 CONSTRUCTION ON VIVIENDA BRIDGE 1,440 00 (4) 15854 DENNIS EVANS STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1986 150 00 (5) 15856 HUGH GRANT STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1986 150 00 (6) 15859 HEALTH NET MEDICAL INSURANCE, PETTA FOR JUNE, 1986 15 67 (7) 15864 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1986 150 00 (8) 15870 ANTHONY PETTA STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1986 134 33 (9) 15871 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1986 150 00 TOTAL $7,284 02 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER d &.6J41611k1 , !1 1 ( T,! Fj"y it 01kv)` � - I "n - 3,/7 f AGE 1 CHECK RE(iI t - NO 052286 Vf'I0 I ��1N.�IL Al eROVA4 VOUCHED/6APRANTTFEGISTER nITE 05/15/A�, EPRACE l•V11- 6AFRANT %UrBER NUMEEP NAPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 1 i 4513 _- 619 7-SAL LY-S.ILNF RAl Ap VAN C.E-s S T OK 631-3U --631. 3 0 - '•' P4514 C720 SO.CA.EDISGN COMPANY PAY.5/5/86 EDISON 113.01 113.01 •IP4515 0720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY PA.5/6/869EOISON 46.62 46.6Z I, D49;1 A 67A7 STATE COMPFNSATTON INSF TNO WORK Cf1N.P_ TNS-418A 630.78 ��D.ZB P4517 C531 SHERIFF FLLYD TIDWELL LAW ENFORCE.5/86 37,798.00 37,796.00 P4519 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY PAY.5/8/869EDISON 19.11 19.11 P 4 S;Q 3 6 6 7 9 S E C U R I T Y P A C I F i_ M A T. BA NK T /.S-C.pNF-..ANLS_LLIyF _ T 4 a _.0 0 .I MEET.COLTON,ARMSTEAD 18.27 CAL-TAX,SCHWAB 287.17 454.44 • I= P4521 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANYL PAY.5/9/86,GAS 17.75 17.75 ..,,n ie7rAu c ASSnC1ATFS _ ENG.SYCS_4/7-5J4JA6 4*f1]L.9n 11 ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86 ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86 ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86 ¢ ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86, ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86 ENG.SVCS.4/7-5/4/86 9,820.12 1,122.10 s 4,684.35 " 608.40 738 00 1,471.75 249228.92 P4523 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY PA'1.5/14/869EDISON Z1.9H ci.4n 15837 k-iFE/LANE/ct4RTsTnPH R ARCHI7 T El PAY C/P i,TAq.io II'I 15838 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE MAY AD,I.E.MAGAZINE 1,567.50 1,567.50 ' 15939 ALLSTATE BUSINESS FORMS I.D.CARDS,SE.CITIZENS 47.70 47.70 1 _• 150 0 CATHERINE/STAN Y BENNETT W W.O.REFl1Njh RFNNFTT 7-On 7--OD ) I I 15841 KEN14ETH GRIMES W.W.D.REFUNC,GRIMES 5.39 5.39 15842 WILLIAM ROBERTSON W.W.D.REFUND,ROBERTSON 3.29 .5 19 �1^ IIV t�01A ,a, t 3 5843 1210 SETH ARMSTEAb CMTA-MEEL.ARMS�AO 111.10 --- tl LOCAL MILE.ARMSTEAD 68.75 182 25 1 I �1R44 13E0 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER B_QLTLFr) NATFR.5/14,rC 78_,50 --18.50 - -- �I F--15R45 1450 BONAUIPAN-MCCAIN,INC. PAY Nl VIV.PRIDGE 1,440.00 19440.00 - 1'P46 1725 NOk',hN T. CAOUFTTE CAOUETTE 5/5/86 25.00 2`,.00 1i I 15F147 - 17�8 _((IASTah� CF1APLArI-_ --CLEAN_UP-R/JjP./-K__ ao.90 __ec.no _ Vr!IFrr,t ` CITY I CPANJ ItRFtCF FtGE 2 f't I 0' /3� /f 1 kOUCHEP/ktPPtNT FF(.15TER 1 S --L R l G:'-F L/ kT-W I) OT - -V-€t -P 9 R -I T E-0 - ---- ---- - - I T E M- - - --- - - - w A R f. A N DAPPAN1 14UV6ER NUM E'ER NAFE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ! _-1 �"iL4 8 -- 17 P 1 ---G17ty S O L-I D AT-E D-E L EC -Tr, I C AL-D I S T. -- E-X-I T-R U L-B S---- 4.2 3--- ---- - EXIT PULBS E 46 12.69 8414--1 7-4N -.6rc� r�i n r6LrE - COL-E1--5 6 -2r..00- 23.00--- 15850 1 1800 SANFORD L. COLLINS COLLINS95/5/86 25.00 25.00 - - 15P51 1P75 COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS RENT ON TOSHIFA COPIER 494 77 494 77 15- 6-5 2 1 y-12 3 n C G M a of i T�E-R--S-U R P 6 Y a R 1 A-T-E-R-R4-B K-0 t 31 as 31-. 7 7 15853 2050 DIRECT SAFETY CO. STREET EQUIPMENT 125.69 125 69 I 158r4 2278 DENNIS L E V A N 5 EVANS 5/86 150 00 EVANS 5/86 150 00 300.00 �F 15855 a 2890 GRAND TERRACE GLASS E MIPROR REPLACE WINDOW/C C. 156 00 156.00 I2 1, 15856 2990 HIIGH r.RANT _.-G.RAkT4-5-/86 150.O0 -- '22 GPANT, 5/86 150.00 300.00 15P97 111,n HAPPFP rOMPANY REPATya.DJBIPAS-CAI IPIC0 A A 6 00 684-00---- 5 26 15658 2 3155 JERRY HAWKINSON HAWKINSON95/5/86 25.00 25 00 ,2E 1r859 3163 HEALTH NET MED INS PETTA 6/86 15 67 MED.INS PETTA 6/86 150.00 3 mrn- Tn1c�t,/b(, 164-22 -- MED.INS 6/86 246.33 12 MED.INS. 6/86 246.33 133 M E.D--I.N-S-•--_bJ-a 6 2 4b...3 3 -- MED INS. 6/bb 82 11 1v150 99 13- 41F.4 K MAPT tl4437 JAATAI SIIpPI TEs-,r r -2y-22 1_y�2Z -15PFn I ,- I'F1 15861 4370 LELAND NURSERY SHRUBS C/C 41.34 41 34 15C'62 4470 LOMA LINDA DISPOSAL TRASH PICK-UP,C/C 5/86 3P 35 TRASH PICK-UPePARK 5/86 38 35 I F x TR.A-P_3-Ck -U-P4kAtRK 1 `+ .-0 0- 91.-70 - i t. 15963 1 4655 JOHN MCDOWELL MCDOWELL95/5/86 25.00 25.00 158E4 4658 BYFON PiATTESON MATTESON95/86 150 00 14 MATTES01195/e6 150.00 300 00 " 1:865 4718 MOPGAN AND FRAM LIFE IN5.6/b6 14.50- - LIFE INS.6/E6 21 75 --- - ---- - ----- - --- - - --- -- L IF E-I.N S .6 / E 6- --- --21-.7-5- - - LIFE INS 6/b6 21 75 LIFE INS 6/I6 7.25 87.00 VOUCNFk/6AFP/kT kCGISTrt __—Y�rLDLiEJ Vr Nr CF TL%I-- - 6ARRANT NUMBER 14LIMEEk i NAPE DESCRIPTION --158b6 __5890 -JEAjN NYEfsS�_-__----- ----CLDSS.GUARD_4/1P-5/9/86 15867 5405 ED O'NEAL CPIME PkEVENT COIF E/0 15868 5527 THOMAS B. PAGE PARK CLEAN-UP 4/86 158P9 5529 PACTFTC BF11 —COPP-.—PHON+ COMP PHONE PAY PHONE,C/C 15870 5565 ANTHONY PETTA 15R71 5576 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN _-- -- -__—I T_EM - - - - -- kAFZnAN - AMOUNT AP(LUNT — --127 20 - - -- -- 127.20 17C 00 170 00 116.00 116.00 7 03 26.09 PETTA, 5/86 134.33 PFENNIGHAUSEN95/86 150 00 PFEP NI GHAUSEN,5/86 150 00 -7-4--19 - 134.33 CAI ED CnNF. R/P 246_35 .35 --__ 15872 5579 PEOPLE HELPERS,INC. PEC.SCVS.5/1-5/15/86 17646.85 19648.85 15873 5581 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH kEIMB 6.47 6.47 PETTY CASH kEIMB. PETTY CASH R.FTMR_ 6.47 6-47 31 53 P_no — PETTY CASH REIMB. 6.47 8 00 PFTTY CASH PEIMB. 6.47 31 79 PE_LT_Y_S_ASH kFTMR. 6_47 6_5R f PETTY CASH FEIMP. 6 47 8 59 PETTY CASH REIMP. 6 47 41 62 P=-YCASH kFIME- 6.47 2.44 145_L12- 15874 6531 SHERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL OVERTIME,SFIEPIFF,1-3/86 697 28 697.28 15875 65P0 StN ITATION b OPERATION SEWER MA1NT. VS/DP 750 00 750.CO 15P76 6614 THO%IAS-SCHhAP CA 1 - LOCAL MILEAGE,CHb!AR E 33.5 91 01 ` 19877 6655 SICNAI MAILT NANCF INC. MAj.N_T_,SlG-(3) 4/R6 219.49 219-48 15878 66P1 SMART E FINAL IRIS COMPANY SUPPLIES,COUNCIL 9E.65 98 65 15879 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY FLEC.SIG.(3) 250.11 2 LIGHTS,PAkK 25 08 -_ SZ. LI-GHT 5-9 3J_L-SJ-3018L 4 , 7 n .16- - 5 9D.5.5 .35.— -_ 158P0 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY GPS,CITY PLDGS 53 05 --- GhS,C/C---------------- --------_220.79----- - ---273.79 15881 6844 THE SUN AD,PEC SEKVICES 79 56 -AD_P E C NE LP----- --- 9 O-L I -- -- 17 0.17 - pP2 7056 PEGGY 1POT11L-R LOCAL MILE TPOTTIEk 13 35 -- __ -- --- — _--- _-----_ L O C A L M I L E, T R O I T-I E R _ _ 4. t, 5 ---- -- -_-1 b 0 0_ V, Ct L f F - L1 TY OF CFAt 0 TF RkALF rrTF C51`1`_/f�, VUl,CHEP/hAFbcnT FEGIS-rr VnLafhE�L---VF-v&N0Qk—--- I-TIM HAFRANT flUME'Ek NUMCEk NAME DESCRIPTION --------UNION 014-49-.9F-CAL-IFOPNIA -----FUEL/C1TY TF;UGK— TOOTAL—GHE-GK-S e IAGL ---- - — ITEh - --- -- hAkkAN AMOUNT AMOUNT -----59.94- --- -------59.94 2--- I CERTIFY THAT T THEIST OF MY-KNOWLEDGE.,-'HF-AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR -_PAYMENT -OF CLTY-LIABILITIES -_ HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY I THOMAS_SCH_WAB_ FINANCE DIRECTOR , 4 May 5, 1986 12-9 1045 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (x) MEETING DATE- May 22, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3_E SUBJECT Release of Bond # SB-4249 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED xx Attached you will find a request from Fairmont Insurance Company for a release of Bond #SB-4249, for improvements within Tract #10392. The Tract is located in the City of Colton and the above mentioned Bond secured the improvements for the installation of the sewer and the proper completion of the roadway within the City of Grand Terrace. The work has been completed and the City of Colton is holding additional security for any failure that might occur in the future STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT BOND #SB-4249 BE RELEASED. Attachments y JK/lh 0 Colton APR 14 1986 April 7, 1986 Department COMUNITY SERVICES Phone No 370-5065 Kicak and Associates 22365 Barton Rd Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Re Tract #10392 Gentlemen With regards to bond #SB-4249 for the above tract, you may release it effective April 4, 1986 The tract is not final to this date, however, we are holding suffi- cient bonding per the enclosed letter to satisfy any future require- ments Sincerely, C. JOHN C HUTTON Acting Director of Community Services JCH/lj Enc 16 CITY OF COLTON CIVIC CENTER 0 650 N LA CADENA DRIVE 0 COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324 FAIRMONT INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL FORM STATUS INQUIRY WECE,VED AT DU R 0219"R 02 1986 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE KICAK & A�S-oCIATES ATINJ: JOSEPH KCCAK/CITY ENGR. Our Bond No SB 4249 22795 BAR cN ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 L J Contractor NIBKO & ASSOCIATES Address 41860 Shady Lane, Hemet, California 92344 Description of Contract TRACT NO. 10392/SANITARY S IER LCX:ATION• SI17 COMER OF PRIM. AVENUE & ( Include Location and Owners Contract Number) ROSEDALE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF COLTON (rainstorm damage --surer 184) Owner ^Contract Price $ 51000.00 Bond (s) $ 5,000.00 Effective Date 10/23/84 Without prejudicing your right or affecting our liability under our bond(s) described above, we would appreciate such of the following information as is now available Thank You By PATTI K. Tr1AI2M Surety Department 1 IF CONTRACT COMPLETED PLEASE STATE Approximate date of completion of work ( or final delivery ) Approximate acceptance date Final Contract Price $ Do you know of any unpaid bills for labor or materials (Check) 0 Yes 0 No 2 IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED PLEASE STATE Approximate percentage or dollar amount of contract completed or delivered Probable completion date (Approximate) 3 Do you know of any unpaid bills for labor or material (Check) C1 Yes ❑ No 4 Remarks (If any) PLEASE RETURN ORIGINAL OF THIS INQUIRY TO P= K. INA= Date C/o FAIRAIONT INSURANCE CWPANY 1240 SOUM STATE COTUDM BLVD., #p245 Signature ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Title 19 �i F ETA 1 O ►T Date 5/2! 2/ C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 5/22/86 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3F SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 44, WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY BOND LAW OF 1986 FUNDING IS REQUIRED NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX Mayor Grant requested this Resolution be placed on Agenda. Staff Recommends Council ADOPT THE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSTION 44, WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY BOND LAW OF 1986. SS Enclosures f PENDING MY Pt ,Y COUNCIL APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 44, THE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY BOND LAW OF 1986 WHEREAS, an adequate suppl y of good qual i ty water i s essenti al to the health and safety of California's ever growing population, and, WHEREAS, adequate supplies of good quality water are vital to the maintenance and development of the State's economy, particularly California's two largest industries, tourism and agriculture, generating $45 billion in annual revenue for California, and, WHEREAS, locally sponsored water conservation, groundwater recharge, and drainage projects are among the most cost effective ways to help insure adequate supplies of good quality water, and, WHEREAS, in 1984, the California electorate approved a Clean Water Bond Act which provided $10 million for low interest loans to water agencies for water conservation projects, and, WHEREAS, application for those loans exceeded available funds by nine times, demonstrating the need for such a program, and, WHEREAS, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Control Bond Act, Proposition 44, on the June ballot would provide $150 million for loans to water agencies for water conservation, groundwater recharge, and drainage projects, and, WHEREAS, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Bond Act, Proposition 44, would be an extremely cost effective measure for Californians, costing an average of 37 cents per household annually, and, WHEREAS, funds available from Proposition 44 are expected to be a significant help in developing locally sponsored water conservation, drainage, and groundwater recharge projects, ' NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY support Propostion 44 and urges its passage by the California electorate on June 3, 1986 ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1986 ATTEST ity Clerk of the City o Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof - 1 - r �Y e I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1986, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form City Attorney - 2 - ityCer &1ifornia � egitilat LCP Assemblj TummittEe nn Water, Parks ttnb Wilblife JIM COSTA CHAIRMAN May 5, 1986 Dear City Manager I am writing to seek your Council's endorsement of Proposition 44, the Water Conservation and Water Qualtity Bond Law of 1986, which appears on California's June 3, 1986, direct primary ballot Proposition 44 will provide $150 million in much -needed loans to local agencies for voluntary, cost-effective water conservation programs, groundwater recharge facilities, and agricultural drainage water treatment and containment works Two years ago, voters approved Proposition 25, the Clean Water Bond Law, which provided funding for wastewater treatment, water reclamation, and water conservation programs The Department of Water Resources received 55 applications from local agencies throughout the state requesting nearly $90 million in assistance for water conservation alone Proposition 44 will enable these local agencies to conserve water now being lost due to leaking pipes and unlined ditches and canals. ' Proposition 44 will also provide loans for a new state program -- groundwater recharge -- which has been practiced in California for almost 90 years Groundwater recharge is a proven method of placing surplus surface water from wet years into available storage underground so that it can be used in dry years This underground space is available in the Central Valley and in valley areas in coastal and Southern California As storing surface water behind dams has become more expensive, storing water underground where it does not evaporate becomes more practical, efficient, and economical RECEIVED MAY 8 1986 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE STATE CAPITOL / SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA 95814 / (916) 445-6164 The third program contained in Proposition 44 addresses our state's agricultural drainage problem. Californians have made a strong commitment to protecting water quality. Much of our efforts have focused on treating municipal sewage water before it is discharged to our rivers, bays, and ocean waters. Today, rural areas throughout the state need to implement better treatment and containment methods because of the salt and trace element buildup in farm drainage water. This drainage problem will progressively worsen unless we take positive steps to correct it. Proposition 44 will provide funding for the treatment and containment of drainage water in an environmentally -safe manner. An abundant supply of clean water will preserve the beauty of California's environment, maintain fish and wildlife, and support recreation. A continued supply of clean water will also ensure the vitality of industry and agriculture. Most importantly, however, a clean and abundant supply of water is necessary to preserve and protect public health. I hope your Council can join me and Californians for Clean Water in endorsing Proposition 44. A growing list of supporters includes the California Chamber of Commerce, Association of California Water Agencies, California Farm Bureau Federation, Cal -Tax, California State Grange, California Labor Federation (AFL-CIO), and the American Association of University Women. There is no known opposition to Proposition 44. I have attached a draft resolution that you may wish to use in endorsing Proposition 44. I would appreciate it if your clerk could forward a copy of your resolution to local media and a copy to Californians for Clean Water, c/o Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, 770 L Street, Suite 1150, Sacramento, California 95814. On behalf of Californians for Clean Water, thank you for any assistance you can provide toward the passage of Proposition 44. Your prompt response is important so that Californians for Clean Water can add your Council to its list of supporters. Si ce ly, i J CO A C irman <t DATE TA I U T May 5, 1986 j I 12.370 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (x) MEETING DATE May 22, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N0. i�� SUBJECT Contract with C H J Incorporated for Construction Materials Testing Services for the Vivienda Avenue Overhead Bridge FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED xx While the construction of the Vivienda Avenue Bridge is in progress, it will be necessary to perform tests on some of the materials used, to insure compliance with the plans and specifications C H.J Incorporated have performed that service on other City pro3ects, and are qualified to do the testing work on the Vivienda Avenue Bridge The funding for this portion of the work has been included in the current budget with carry over to next year's budget STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT FOR TESTING SERVICES WITH C H J INCORPORATED JK/lh GTC 86-03 AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION TESTING SERVICES This personal services agreement between the City of Grand Terrace and CHJ Incorporated is for the purpose of providing construction materials testing services for the Vivienda Bridge project. Services to be provided by CHJ Incorporated may include the following items, and such other duties as directed by the City: 1 Testing Structural Concrete. 2. Testing Structural Backfill. 3. Testing Pavement and Base Materials. 4. Other tests as directed by the Resident Engineer. Reimbursement for these services will be based on the attached Schedule of Fees, identified as Attachment "B", and titled Schedule of Fees. The total amount is estimated not to exceed $3,300.00. The ENGINEER warrants compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, (40 CFR 21 through Appendix H and 23 CFR 710 405 (b). That the ENGINEER and his subcontractors are to maintain all financial records, books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs and to make such materials available at their working office at all reasonable times during the contract period. Such materials are to be available for inspection by authorized representative of the City, the State or the Federal Government, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Following final settlement of the contract accounts with the Federal Highway Administration, such records and documents may be microfilmed at the option of the City, but in any event shall be retained by CHJ Incorporated for a three year period after payment of the final voucher. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BY• MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE CHJ INCORPORATED APPROVED AS TO FORM. CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "i (GTC-86-03) 0 L n r A I pRnGRAMS MAN11AL v n L. 1 SECTION 18 - CIVIL RIGHTS CONTENTS Page No. GENERAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-1 RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-1 Federal Highway Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-1 Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and . . . . . 1-18-2 Civil Rights Headquarters Division of Local Assistance 1-18-7 District Local Assistance Civil Rights Coordinators 1-18-1 METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ASSURANCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-4 LOCAL AGENCY MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAMS . . . . . 1-18-4 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-', SHOW CAUSE NOTICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18-6 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF LOCATION PROCEDURES. . . . 1-18-1, EXHIBITS 18-1 Civil Rights Compliance Review Checklist 18-2 Guidelines For Civil Rights Compliance Review of Location Procedures CIVIL RIGHTS GENERAL 1982-1 This section has been prepared to provide guidance for the Local Agency to comply with the Civil Rights requirements for Federal -aid transportation programs. The information contained in this section has been extracted from other documents and should not be considered as a replacement or substitute for the laws, rules and regulations, agreements, circulars, and other guidance available. Labor Compliance and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) requirements involved in contract administration are covered in Local Programs Manual, Vol. II, Sections 2-15 and 2-16, respectively. FHPM 2-1-2 provides guidelines for the implementation of Title VI provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and for the conduct of Title VI compliance reviews relative to the Federal -aid Highway Program, including but not limited to the Civil Rights program for those agencies receiving Federal -aid highway funds. Part 23 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations establishes the Federal Department of Transportation's policy of supporting the fullest possible participation of firms owned and controlled by minorities and women in Department of Transportation programs. RESPONSIBILITIES Federal Highway Administration The FHWA administers the payment of Federal -aid Highway funds to states, counties, cities, and other agencies such as transit districts, etc., for transportation related projects. The FHWA is responsible for monitoring these agencies for compliance with Title VI and other aspects of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968, 1973, and Executive Order 11246, all concerning nondiscrimination in administration of federal funds. Since the Civil Rights and MBE programs are not under Certification Acceptance, the FHWA has retained ultimate approval authority over these Programs. However, some activities have been delegated to the State through the FHWA's approval of the State's Civil Rights and MBE programs. r � r 1-18-2 1982-1 Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights FHWA required the states to develop and implement appropriate guide- lines to assure full compliance with Civil Rights and MBE requirements. Caltrans developed the Civil Rights Implementation Plan and the Caltrans Minority Business Program in order to comply with these requirements. Headquarters responsibilities include the following: 1. Compile required reports for FHWA. 2. Develop Caltrans Affirmative Action Guidelines and Caltrans Minority Business Program for FHWA approval. 3. Approve Caltrans Divisional Affirmative Action Plans. 4. Field review and monitor contractors for compliance with area plans and MBE requirements. 5. Investigate discrimination complaints. 6. After thorough investigation, Headquarters could order the issuance of a "Show Cause" notice against a contractor or Local Agency. Headquarters Division of Local Assistance , Division responsibilities include the following- 1. Ensure Local Agency compliance with Title VI requirements. 2. Develop Title VI compliance review procedures and affirmative action guidelines, subject to approval by the Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights. 3. Ensure Local Agency compliance with MBE requirements. a. Review and approve proposed Local Agency MBE programs. b. Prepare and update MBE directory. c. Conduct MBE process reviews. d. Review and recommended action to be taken for Local Agency or contractor noncompliance with MBE requirements will be a joint decision reached between the Division of Local Assistance and the Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights. e. Make necessary reports to the Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights. 4 4. Assist Districts in developing training programs for Local Agency Civil Rights and Engineering staffs. 1-18-3 1982-1 District Local Assistance Civil Rights Coordinator • District responsibilities include the following- 1. Conducts Title VI Compliance reviews of the Local Agency's MBE and Civil Rights programs to assure compliance with Federal requirements. (See EXHIBIT 18-1.) a. Includes specific recommendations for improving the agency's MBE and Civil Rights programs. b. Determines if an agency's MBE and Civil Rights policies and • procedures meet Federal requirements to be eligible for Federal -aid highway funds. 2. Develops and administers training programs for the Local Agency's Civil Rights officer and engineering staff which include. a. Developing and implementing agency's MBE and Civil Rights programs and Affirmative Action Plan. b. Communicating with minorities and disadvantaged groups and women. c. Preparing and reviewing MBE and Civil Rights reports and documents. d. Checking MBE and Civil Rights compliance procedures. e. Informing the agency and contractor of MBE and Civil Rights requirements and assisting them in preparing reports and documents. f. Review and recommend approval of contract award to Local Agency contractor in accordance with specified procedures regarding meeting goals. 3. Monitors the Local Agency's plan and programs by conducting office and field reviews with the agency's Civil Rights officer. 4. At the request of the Local Agency or a third party, investigates, analyzes, and recommends solutions for Title VI discrimination complaints. 5. Maintains up-to-date summary of Local Agency's MBE and Civil Rights status. 6. Makes necessary reports to the Division MBE Coordinator. 1-18-4 1982-1 METHODS OF COMPLIANCE ASSURANCES , 1. Assurances by the agencies- The State signs annual assurances to the FHWA to certify compliance with the law. Similar assur- ances are agreed to by the Local Agency when they execute the "Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal -Aid Projects". (See Section 16, "Local Agency -State Agreements" of this manual.) The Program Supplemental Agreement for each project will include the Local Agency's reaffirmation of the Nondiscrimination Assurances contained in the "Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal -Aid Projects." 2. Reviews: Methods of administration by the State and Local Agencies are subject to periodic reviews by the FHWA. 3. Field Reviews- The FHWA may choose to audit recipients directly. A field review may be held if felt necessary in any agency, particularly in the event of complaints to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights personnel will participate in these field reviews. LOCAL AGENCY MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAMS The Local Agency has two options in complying with the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Program requirements. These options include the following- 1. Accept the Caltrans MBE Program. 2. Develop own MBE Program in compliance with Part 23 of Title 49 CFR. The following discussion outlines the approval procedures for the MBE Programs and specifications for each of the options. Option 1 - Accept the Caltrans MBE Program This option must be used when Caltrans advertises and awards the contract. It may be used when the Local Agency receives only FHWA funds and receives less than $100,000 per year or all projects are under $100,000. In this option, the Local Agency indicates their decision to use the Caltrans MBE Program in the PS&E transmittal letter and designates their MBE Liaison Officer. The Local Agency inserts the Caltrans MBE special provisions in their contract special provisions. The District MBE Coordinator reviews and approves the special provisions. The Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights sets the project MBE goals on Caltrans advertised projects. � JJ 1-18-5 1982-1 Option 2 - Develop own MBE Program in compliance with Part 23 of Title 49 CFR. This option must be used when the Local Agency is not eligible for Option 1. It cannot be used when Caltrans advertises and awards the contract. If a Local Agency chooses to develop their own MBE Program in compliance with Part 23 of Title 49 CFR, their program must be approved by a Federal Department of Transportation (DOT) Modal Element, such as the Federal Highway Administration, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration, or the Federal Aviation Administration. Once the Local Agency's MBE Program has been approved by a DOT Modal Element the MBE Program must be accepted by all other DOT Modal Elements. Normally, the Local Agency will go to the DOT Modal Element which provides the most Federal funds on an annual basis for approval. The approval procedures outlined in this section cover approvals by the FHWA. If the Local Agency chooses to obtain approval from another DOT Modal Element, they should be contacted for approval procedures. Once a program is accepted by the DOT Modal Element, Caltrans will honor the Local Agency's program until notified otherwise. The Local Agency will send to Caltrans a copy of the submitted program with the DOT Modal Element's letter of acceptance. The Local Agency prepares their MBE Program and submits it to the District. The transmittal letter should indicate if more than one DOT Modal Element will be involved. The District MBE Coordinator reviews the proposed MBE Program and forwards it to Headquarters. In Headquarters, the proposed MBE Program is reviewed by the Local Assistance MBE Coordinator. At the option of the Local Agency, the program may first be submitted in draft form for comments by the District and Headquarters Coordinators. The Headquarters Local Assistance MBE Coordinator concurs in or approves the MBE Program and notifies the Local Agency. The Local Agency includes the special provisions, which implement their MBE Program, into their contract special provisions. After the Local Agency's MBE Program has been accepted by a DOT Modal Element, Caltrans review of the MBE special provisions and project MBE goals will be limited to verifying their inclusion in the contract. However, the Local Agency will be required to comply with the Caltrans MBE Program reporting procedures. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINTS The procedures in this section have been established to receive and resolve alleged civil rights discrimination complaints concerning a project or projects funded with FHWA funds. The complaint may be lodged 1-18-6 1982-1 with either the local agency, Caltrans, or the FHWA. Discrimination , complaints may be initiated by individuals, groups of individuals, or organizations. Discrimination complaints should be in writing. Any Title VI or MBE complaints received by Caltrans will be investigated by the Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights. They will endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt. The appropriate DOT Modal Element will be furnished a copy of the complaint and rill be invited to participate in the investigation and resolution. The DOT Modal Element will receive a complete investigative report on the complaint and will be requested to concur in the proposed disposition of said complaint. Local Agencies shall notify the Caltrans District of any Title VI or WE discrimination complaints they may receive concerning Local Assistance Programs administered by Caltrans. SHOW CAUSE NOTICES Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights conducts frequent reviews of minority hiring practices of contractors performing work on Federal -aid projects. When a contractor is found not in com- P11dnce with the requirements for minority hiring practices, he is officially notified by issuance of a "Show Cause Notice." In both State administered and Local Agency administered contracts, ' the Show Cause Notice will be prepared by Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights when a discrepancy is found. The District will be requested to issue the Notice and schedule the hearing for a date 15 to 20 days after the contractor's anticipated receipt of the Notice. The Notice must bear the signature of a District Deputy Director or Division Chief at the Supervising Engineer level or higher. The hearing will normally be held in Sacramento by the Headquarters Office of Affirmative Action and Civil Rights. They should receive five copies of the Show Cause Notice and two copies of the return receipt. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE REVIEWS OF LOCATION PROCEDURES The State will monitor a Local Agency's location procedures to assure compliance with Title VI and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1968, respectively. The Guidelines For Civil Rights Compliance Reviews of Location Procedures" (see EXHIBIT 18-2), written in question form, will be used to the extent applicable as a minimum guide. These guidelines are intended to suggest areas where compliance reviews may be appropriate, not to limit the range of questions that may be asked. After a review is completed, the reviewer should have a rather conprehensive knowledge of the agency's highway location procedures as they pertain to civil rights. Based upon the answers to these questions, ' the reviewer should be able to judge whether or not the agency is in complidnce with Title VI and Title VIII and recommend appropriate renedial action. ' EXHIBIT 18-1a 1982-1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE REVIEW CHECKLIST General 1. Does agency have formal Title VI Civil Rights Program? If no, reasons? 2. Does agency have approved MBE Program? If no, reasons? 3. Management Support Statement of programs? How implemented throughout agency? 4. Civil Rights Coordinator and MBE Liaison Officer identified and phone numbers? What are areas of responsibility? Who do Coordinators report to? 5. If the reviewer does not already have one, obtain copy of Title VI and MBE Affirmative Action Plans. If not completed, what reasons for delay? 6. What procedure is used to handle Title VI and MBE discrimination complaints? 7. Written Title VI or MBE discrimination complaints pending? What is basis of discrimination complaint? 8. What action has been taken on written Title VI or MBE discrimination complaints completed within last year? Federal -Aid Highway Projects 1. How are MBE project goals being set? Are the goals realistic? 2. What MBE directory does the agency use? If the agency uses their own, how is it updated? How are firms being certified? 3. How are prospective MBE contractors being notified of advertised projects? 4. Are prospective MBE contractors being provided bidding assistance? 5. Is the agency's "good faith effort" determination well documented? EXHIBIT M-lb 1982-1 i 6. How are MBE and Labor Compliance requirements being monitored on going contracts? 7. Are MBE reports to Caltrans timely? Do project records back, up reports? 8. Any consultant agreements or contracts? How many given to MBE contractors? What steps taken to increase MBE participation? 9. Are any route planning studies underway? If yes, see Exhibit 18-2. 10. Are public hearings being publicized and held in convenient locations? 11. Is right of way being obtained for federal -aid projects? Dotes right of way impact minorities? Note: This review will be limited to the agency's road department. However, the agency will not be required to develop separate programs. for the road department if their program covers more than their road department. c it ' r 0:�IBIT 18-2a GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE REVIEWS OF LOCATION PROCEDURES General 1. As a result of the choice of highway locations or the pr-ocedures used in arriving at the choice, has the Agency, State, s- Federal Highway Administration received any civil rights compla--fts? If so, what were the complaints and what has been done to resa'•ve them? 2. a. To what extent does the Agency employ minority star= personnel in the location program under review? Are these pe!-ssonnel involved in the following- - - developing and comparing alternatives, - - assessing impacts, and - - when used, operating through consultant contrac =? Are they involved in any other related areas? If not, awaat is being done to recruit and hire minority personnel? b. What training or educational sessions are conducted =.o increase the skills of minorities as well as nonminorities? -nre promo- tion opportunities available for minorities? Does :=pe Agency fill professional as well as nonprofessional posztiocns with minorities? If not, what is being done to rectify =-t=ese situations? 3. Does the Agency choose consultant firms without discrim--•ation on the basis of race, sex, color, creed, or national origi Is there evidence that minority consultants and consultants with--inority staffs offered equal employment opportunity? How many these firms have contracts and what type are they? 4. Does the process for preparation of Environmental Impac= State- ments, or do the Environmental Impact Statements themse foes, reflect any indication of a violation of any of the provisions Title VI or Title VIII? If so, elaborate. ( `EXHIBIT 18-2b Location Determination When reviewing the process leading to location determination on a specific project, the following questions are to be used. 1. To what extent has the Agency or consultant compiled the following information for use in the location determination? a. The racial character of the portion of the area through which the alternate locations pass, including the approximate number by race of persons and families affected by each alternate (affected means all persons directly displaced or located in areas directly adjoining the road). b. The social and economic character of the area through which alternates pass, including levels of income, whether the area is commercial or residential, and the approximate number of minor- ity and nonminority owners of businesses and residences in the area. c. The racial character of the people employed in the area affected by each alternate. 2. How was the racial and ethnic data used to identify possible problem areas and adverse impacts, such as relocation difficulties or possi- ble changes in minority income capabilities, mobility, or commu m ty cohesion? What efforts have been made to rectify these problem areas and minimize the adverse impacts? 3. Will a minority area be bypassed or separated from contiguous areas by any of the alternatives and, if so, what effect will this have on the minority community? To what extent will it perpetuate patterns of segregation? 4. How will each of the alternates affect the use of various community facilities and services such as hospitals, libraaries, shopping areas, fire stations, police installations, schools, churches, parks and recreation centers by minority groups in the area? 5. To what extent will each of the locations produce an adverse effect on residential, commercial and industrial development existing or planned within minority communities? 6. What attempt has the Agency made to satisfy minority community planning goals and needs? To what extent were the goals and needs determined utilizing input from the minority community? EXHIBIT 18-2c 7. Have the gradeline, safety considerations, cross -street treatment, pedestrian overpasses, and other design features been established for all alternatives to the same degree in minority areas as in nonminority areas? 8. Is access to and from the various alternates provided without ` discrimination? 9. Would the alternates have an effect on traffic volumes on adjacent streets within minority communities? To what extent has the Agency studied the effect of increased or decreased traffic on residences and business? 10. To what extent have aesthetics, noise, and air quality been considered within minority communities? 11. Has all the above information been adequately tabulated and mapped for use in the location determination? Community Participation In any review of projects, a determination should be made that the minority groups have had an opportunity to provide meaningful input into the decision -making process regarding their goals and needs as they pertain to the location determination. The following questions should be used: 1. To what extent do the Agency's procedures provide for consultation with and dissemination of information to minorities? 2. Where non-English speaking minorities are involved, what provisions are made to overcome language barriers? 3. How are the minority leaders identified and encouraged to provide suggestions and ask questions about locations? 4. To what extent are informal hearings and meetings held with the affected minority communities and groups? 5. To what extent does the Agency respond to questions asked and consider comments made by minorities? 6. To what extent are minorities represented on the various councils, boards, and committees, etc., that provide input to the location determination? How were these representatives selected and have they been given an equal voice? C EXHIBIT 18-2d Public Hearings When reviewing the conduct of public hearings, the following questions should be used; 1. Are hearing(s) held at a place and time convenient to minorities? 2. Are advertisements of the hearings) (i.e., newspapers, posters, radio, etd.) adequate to provide notification to minorities? f- 3. Where non-English speaking minorities are involved, what provisions are made to overcome language barriers both in advertisements and at the hearing(s)? 4. Are minority leaders specifically invited to attend and present their views? Do they attend? Do they make comments? 5. To what extent does the Agency respond to questions asked and consider comments made by minority persons at the hearing(s)? 6. To what extent are fair housing requirements and the availability of hardship acquisition discussed at public hearings when minorities are to be relocated? l L C SCHEDULE OF FEES C.H.J. INCORPORATED COLTON, CALIFORNIA Effective 10/01/85 Included in this Schedule of Fees are costs for some services and tests commonly performed by this firm. Other services or tests, as well as costs for these services or tests, can be supplied upon request. 0 L�, TABLE OF CONTENTS Soil Engineering and Testing Services .............. ..... 1 InspectionServices ....................................... 4 LaboratoryServices ...................................... 9 • [ INCORPORATED P 0 Box 231 • 1355 E Cooley Dr, Colton, Calif 92324 • Phone (714) 824-7210 SOIL ENGINEERING AND TESTING C.H.J. Incorporated has provided Soil Engineering services to its clients since 1964. The Soil Engineering section consists of four Registered Professional Engineers assisted by two graduate Staff Engineers, a Laboratory Supervisor, a supervising Soil Technician, Field Operations Dispatcher, and a total staff of 40 people. Services include soil engineering, foundation investigation, percolation testing, investigation of soils -related distress, as well as field inspection of grading, pile installation, earth tieback systems, and other soil -related projects. Asphalt concrete and soil cement design services are also provided by this firm, as well as a full range of laboratory soil testing. Geological studies and engineering geology investigation are also provided through our consultant -1- SOILS ENGINEERS • MATERIALS TESTING AND EVALUATION • CONSTRUCTION INRPFC'TION e 4=0"0 %J• Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area SOIL ENGINEERING AND TESTING ENGINEERING, OFFICE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES CES RATE PER HOUR Principal Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 80.00 Project Engineer (Registered) . . . . . . . . . . 55.00 Staff Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.00 Supervising Field Technician. . . . . . . . . . . 41.00 Field Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39.00 Field Technician (Nuclear Guage). . . . . . . . . 44.00 Supervising Lab Technician. . . . . . . . . . . . 41.00 Lab Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39.00 Drafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.00 Typing, Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 Litigation, Expert Witness & Preparation by Professional Engineer - 8-Hour Minimum (+ expenses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 Subsistence and Lodging - per day subject to review for specific projects. . . . . . . . . . 50.00 PREMIUM RATES A. Overtime (at client's request), add . . . . . 10.00 B. Sundays and Holidays, add . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 NOTE: THE HOURLY RATES QUOTED ABOVE INCLUDE ALL COSTS FOR FIELD EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE FOR WHICH OUR CLIENTS WILL PAY NO ADDITIONAL FEE. -2- Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area SOIL ENGINEERING AND TESTING ENGINEERING, OFFICE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES (continued) SERVICES - OTHER Engineering Geology or Engineering Geologist. . .Quotation Computer Time (For Engineering Analysis). . . . .Cost + 20% Printing and Photographic Work. . . . . . . . . .Cost + 20% Subcontract Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cost + 20% EQUIPMENT CHARGES FIELD EQUIPMENT Pick-up Truck and Automobile Mileage. . . . . . .No Charge EXPLORATORY EQUIPMENT Drill Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost + 20t Backhoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost + 20 o REPORTS - EXTRA COPIES Current Files (Not over one year old) Minimum Service Charge, per report. . . . . . .S 7.50 Copies ( per sheet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Inactive Files (One year or older) Minimum Service Charge, per report. . . . . . . 10.00 Copies, per sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 -3- • H • INCORPORATED P 0 Box 231 1355 E Cooley Dr, Colton, Calif 92324 a Phone (714) 824-7210 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION C.H.J. Incorporated has been providing construction materials testing and inspection services to the construction industry since 1964. The Inspection and Material Testing Department consists of two Registered Professional Engineers assisted by a Supervising Inspector and Field Operations Dispatcher, a Laboratory supervisor, and Licensed Deputy Building Inspectors. C.H.J. Incorporated is a signatory to an Agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12, AFL-CIO, covering licensed building inspectors. The Deputy Building Inspectors are licensed and/or approved in the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and approved by the Office of State Architect for the inspection of reinforced concrete, post tensioned and pre -stressed concrete, structural steel, reinforced masonry and reinforced gunite construction. A full range of laboratory testing and non-destructive testing is also provided. -4- SOILS ENGINEERS • MATERIALS TESTING AND EVALUATION • CONSTRUCTION INSPFCTION ,� 4a Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION INSPECTION, OFFICE AND MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES SERVICES RATES PER HOUR Principal Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80.00 Project Engineer (Registered) . . . . . . . . . . 55.00 Staff Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.00 Supervising Lab Technician. . . . . . . . . . . . 41.00 Lab Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39.00 Drafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.00 Typing, Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 Deputy Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.00 a. Concrete Batch Plant Inspection b. Field Concrete Inspection c. Masonry Inspection d. Reinforcing Steel Inspection e. Pre -stress and Post -Tension Concrete Inspection f. Shop Welding Inspection g. Field Welding Inspection h. Structural Steel Inspection i. Field Gunite Inspection Supervising Deputy Inspection . . . . . . . . . . 43.00 Non -Destructive Testing - Ultrasonic. . . . . . . 45.00 -5- a 40-*4- Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION INSPECTION, OFFICE AND MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES (continued) Non -Destructive Testing - Dye Penetrant . . . . . 43.00 Non -Destructive Testing - Pachometer & Schmidt Hammer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.00 Pick-up Test Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39.00 Inspection Performed by Others. . . . . . . . . .Cost + 20% PREMIUM RATES FOR DEPUTY INSPECTORS Overtime (Monday through Saturday) a. Time and one-half . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 56.00 b . Double time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70.00 c . Sundays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70.00 d. Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98.00 NOTE: See page 7 for conditions and working hours for Deputy Inspectors. ME Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area C.H.J. INCORPORATED SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INSPECTION SERVICES CONDITIONS AND WORKING HOURS MINIMUM CHARGES: Show -up; No inspection performed - 2 hours 1-4 hours inspection performed - 4 hour min- amum Over 4 hours up to 8 hours - 8 hour minimum TRAVEL TIME: No travel time or mileage within 40 miles of our laboratory. For projects outside 40 miles and within 100 miles, mileage will be charged at the rate of 40 cents per mile. REGULAR TIME: First 8 hours, Monday through Friday, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. TIME AND ONE-HALF: The first 3 hours outside regularly consti- tuted shift, Monday through Friday. First 11 hours on Saturday. Before 6:00 a.m. DOUBLE TIME: After first 11 hours of constituted shift Monday through Saturday, all hours on Sunday and holidays off -site TRIPLE TIME: Holidays on -site The following days: New Year's Day, Decora- tion Day, Independance Day, Veteran's Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and the day after, Christmas, the first Saturday following the first Friday of the months of June and December. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL: Second Shift (Swing) Eight hours will be charged for first 7-1/2 hours worked. Tame in excess of 7-1/2 at applicable overtime rate. Third Shift (Graveyard) Eight hours will be charged for first 7 hours worked Time in excess of 7 hours at applic- able overtime rate. PARKING: When not furnished for Inspector, parking will be charged as paid by the Inspector. -7- J n -*4- mJ- Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area C.H.J. INCORPORATED SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INSPECTION SERVICES CONDITIONS AND WORKING HOURS (continued) SUBSISTENCE: On remote jobs over 100 miles from our labora- tory, subsistence, when not furnished for the Inspector, will be charged at S50 per day. COMPLETION: Inspector will remain on job until discharged by competent authority. CANCELLATION: No charge if made before 4.00 p.m. of the preceeding day. TERMS OF PAYMENT: Net - Invoices are for Professional Services and are due upon presentation. -8- J • H • INCORPORATED P O Box 231 • 1355 E Cooley Dr, Colton, Calif 92324 • Phone (714) 824-7210 LABORATORY TESTING A full range of Laboratory Testing equipment is provided for the testing of soil, concrete, aggregates, structural steel, reinforcing steel, masonry, asphalt, soil cement and other items upon request. The laboratory personnel consists of a Laboratory Supervisor and four experienced laboratory technicians. The testing of the various construction material is conducted with the use of calibrated laboratory equipment. All work is performed under the supervision of Registered Professional Engineers. SOILS ENGINEERS • MATERIALS TESTING AND EVALUATION • CONSTRUCTION INRPFC'TION J 1 Effec-*zve 10/01/85 S. California Area SOILS Chemical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quotation Consolidation Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. S 90.00 Direct Shear Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea 80.00 Expansion Tests UBC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 80.00 2.5" Diameter Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 55.00 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determination ASTM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 70.00 Cal Impact Method (CA216). . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 80.00 Mechanical Analysis with Hydrometer Analysis . . Ea. 90.00 Moisture Content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Permeability Test (Complete) . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 150.00 Plasticity Index (Plastic and Liquid Limit). . . Ea. 85.00 R-Value Determination Natural Soil or Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 150.00 Lime or Cement Treated Soil. . . . . . . . . . Quotation Sand Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 30.00 Sieve Analysis (Pit Run) . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 60.00 Sieve Analysis Washed on No. 200 Sieve (Processed Material) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 40.00 Soil Cement Molding and Compressive Strength Test (Set of 3 Specimens, 1 Cement Content) . . . . Ea. 165.00 Soil Cement Molding and Freeze - Thaw Test (Set of 3 Specimens, 1 Cement Content) . . . . Ea. 330.00 Soil Cement Molding and Wet - Dry Test . (Set of 3 Specimens, 1 Cement Content) . . . . Ea. 330.00 Specific Gravity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 65.00 Visual Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 15.00 -10- a 11 AGGREGATES -*4- qkj- Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area Abrasion Resistance (L.A. Rattler) . . . . . . . Ea. 60.00 Centrifuge Kerosene Equivalent - Coarse & Fine (Including Specific Gravity & Sieve Analysis). Ea. 135.00 Clay Lumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 28.00 Cleanness Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 70.00 Durability Factor Coarse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 100.00 Fine . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 100.00 Flat or elongated pieces per size without gradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 45.00 Fractured Faced (count or weight) per size without gradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 45.00 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determination ASTM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 70.00 Cal Impact Method (CA216). . . . . . . . . . Ea. 80.00 Moisture Content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Mortar Making Properties of Fine Aggregate (ASTM C-87-69) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 275.00 Organic Impurities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 30.00 Plasticity Index (Plastic and Liquid Limit). . . Ea. 85.00 R-Value Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 150.00 Sand Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 30.00 Sieve Analysis - Coarse (Processed). . . . . . . Ea. 27.00 Sieve Analysis - Fine Washed on No. 200 Sieve. . Ea. 40.00 Sieve Analysis - (Pit Run Material). . . . . . . Ea. 60.00 Soft Particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 27.00 Soundness Test-(5-Cycle Magnesium or Sodium Sulfate) Fine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 175.00 Coarse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 175.00 Doc d 4= 0"o I&J O Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area AGGREGATES (continued) Specific Gravity and Absorption. . . . . . . . . Ea. 33.00 Film Stripping Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 40.00 Weight per Cubic Foot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 25.00 Percentage of Clay - Hydrometer Method . . . . . Ea. 70.00 Percent Shale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Potential Reactivity (Chemical Method) . . . . . Ea. 175.00 Potential Reactivity (Petrographic Method) Quotation CONCRETE Concrete Mix Design (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. $ 55.00 Trial Mix (6" X 12" Compression Test Cylinders made in Lab., minimum 9 cylinders) Labor (per cylinder) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135.00 Trial Mix (6" X 6" Flexural Test Beams made in Lab., minimum 6 beams Labor ( per beam) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.00 Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165.00 Shrinkage Test (4" X 4" X 11" Prisms 7, 14, 21, and 28 day) per set of three . . . . . . . . . . . 165.00 Modulus of Elasticity (6" X 12" Cylinders) . . . Ea. 66.00 Tensile Splitting Test (6" X 12" Cylinders). . . Ea. 24.00 Dry Unit Weight of 6" X 12" Cylinders. . . . . . Ea. 14.00 Compressive Tests Cement Treated Base Cylinder or Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 14.00 Concrete Cylinder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 14.00 Gunite Cylinder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 19.00 -12- 4 11 CONCRETE (continued) ='"• '�J• Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area Gunite Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 18.00 Concrete Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 18.00 Gunite Core Trimming (extra if needed) . . . . Ea. 20.00 Concrete Core Trimming (extra if needed) . . . Ea. 20.00 Flexural Tests (3rd Point or Simple Flexure) 6" X 6" Beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 26.00 9" X 9" Beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 26.00 Dry Unit Weight of Insulating Concrete . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Compressive Strength of Insulating Concrete. . . Ea. 20.00 Coring (+ $1 per inch length of cored speciman). Hr. 47.00 Additional Technician. . . . . . . . . . . . Hr. 39.00 MASONRY BLOCK AND BRICK Brick, Absorption 24-hour cold water only. . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 18.00 5-hour boil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 18.00 Brick, Compression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 21.00 Brick, Modulus of Rupture. . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 21.00 Block, Absorption, 24 hour cold water. . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Moisture Content as received Ea. 16.00 Block, Compressive Strength. . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 25.00 Block, Linear Drying Shrinkage . . . . . . . . . Ea 60.00 Unit Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea._ 16.00 Mortar Mix Design (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests) Ea. 55.00 Grout Mix Design (Exclusive of Aggregate Tests). Ea. 55.00 -13- a 4=•*4• %J. Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area Mortar Cylinder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 14.00 Grout Prism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 14.00 Masonry Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 18.00 Masonry Core (Shear) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 38.00 Masonry Core Trimming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Masonry Assemblage (Prism), up to 8" X 16" X 16" Ea. 110.00 Masonry Assemblage (Prism), larger than 8" X 16" X 16" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quotation Coring (+ $1 per inch length of cored specimen) Hr. 47.00 Additional Technician . . . . . . . . . . . Hr. 39.00 ASPHALT MIXTURES Asphalt Pavement Mix Design (Hveem Method) . . . Ea. S 540.00 Asphalt Pavement Mix Design (Marshall Method). . Quotation Asphalt Content by Extraction. . . . . . . . . . Ea. 65.00 Asphalt Content and Gradation. . . . . . . . . . Ea. 100.00 Bulk Specific Gravity of Cored or Compacted Spec.Ea. 27.00 Coring of Completed Asphalt Surfacing (+ $1 per inch length of cored specimen, maximum 6" diameter) Hr. 47.00 Additional Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hr. 39.00 Moisture Vapor Susceptibility. . . . . . . . . . Ea. 110.00 Stability Value by Stabilometer. . . . . . . . . Ea. 70.00 Swell Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 70.00 STEEL Reinforcing Steel Tensile Strength, #11 bar and smaller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. $20.00 Bend Test, #11 bar & smaller . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 -14- � '�' qs;j� Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area STEEL (continued) Tensile Strength, #14 bar. . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 42.00 Tensile Strength, #18 bar. . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 66.00 Structural Steel Tensile Strength, up to 100,000 pounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Tensile Strength, 100,000 to 200,000 pounds. . Ea. 22.00 Tensile Strength, 200,000 to 300,000 pounds. . Ea. 27.00 Tensile Strength, 300,000 to 400,000 pounds. . Ea. 31.00 Bend Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Machining and Preparation of Sample. . . . . . . Ea. 28.00 Pre -Stressing Wires and Tendons Tensile Test Only - Single Wire. . . . . . . . Ea. 45.00 Tendons: 7 to 12 Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 65.00 12 to 20 Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 95.00 Above 20 Wire. . . . . . . . . . . . Quotation MISCELLANEOUS Calibration of Hydraulic Jacks and Rams 60 Ton and Under . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. $ 64.00 61 Ton and 100 Ton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 69.00 Over 100 Ton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 61.00 Laboratory Equipment Use of 400,000 lb. Baldwin with operator . . . Hr. 165.00 Use of 300,000 lb. Tinius Olsen with operator. Hr. 85.00 Use of 30,000 lb. Verstester with operator . . Hr. 65.00 Additional Technician When Required. . . . . . Hr. 39.00 -15- � i J C='*4• t�j• Effective 10/01/85 S. California Area MISCELLANEOUS (continued) Roof Cut Analysis New Roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 140.00 Old Roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 200.00 In -Place Density, Fireproofing Material. . . . . Ea. 35.00 Weld Specimen Tests (per AWS) Ultrasonic Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 45.00 Macroetech Test (3 faces). . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 30.00 Reduced -Section, Tension . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Bend Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ea. 20.00 Machining and Preparation of Specimen. . . . . Ea. 28.00 -16- :z .4 z DATE May 16, 1' I A� C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE May 22, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT RECLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNT CLERK POSITION FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED The receptionist function for the City has currently been performed by an Account Clerk's position within the Finance Department. Peggy Trottier, one of the Senior Account Clerks, has accepted a Finance Assistant's position with the City of Moreno Valley. This opening allows staff to promote the Account Clerks currently acting as receptionist and better utilize the skills inherent to an Account Clerk's duties Staff wishes to reclassify the Account Clerk position that acted as a receptionist and establish a receptionist's position, which we would fill with new personnel. This would not increase total staff, but would reclassify one position at a salary and benefit savings of $4,183.00 per year. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE POSITION OF RECEPTIONIST IN THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT. TS bt Attachment JOB DESCRIPTION Title Receptionist Job Summary Under general supervision, answers all incoming calls to city hall, forwarding the calls to the proper departments and/or persons Greets and directs visitors to proper departments and/or persons Responds to a wide variety of citizen inquiries both over the phone and in person Takes messages as needed Oper- ates the City's two-way radio system Performs general clerical duties as required, including light typing Performs related duties as assigned Desirable Qualifications Ability to communicate effectively and establish cooperative working relationships with citizens and others contacted in the course of performing assigned duties Ability to operate a multiple -line switchboard, often with more than one call coming in Recommended salary range by Finance Director 5 85 - 6 14 - 6 45 - 6 77 - 7 11 CITY CO U�JGIL APPRG\..- w i986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- CCUNCIL AGENDA LTEU[ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 AND ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has determined the need to reorganize certain personnel in the Finance Department to eliminate two permanent part-time Account Clerks and replace with two permanent part-time Receptionists, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING SECTION 1. Rescission - That Resolution No. 85-27 is hereby rescinded in its entirety. SECTION 2 Classifications/Salary Ranges - That the following job classifications and sa ary ranges are hereby esta lished for employees of the City of Grand Terrace, and said salary ranges shall be effective May 23, 1986. 11 TITLE SALARY RANGE Finance Director/Assistant City Manager Community Services Director/ Assistant City Manager City Clerk Accountant/Finance Office Manager Deputy City Clerk Administrative Assistant Senior Account Clerk Maintenance Lead Person Minutes Clerk/Records Coordinator f Maintenance Worker Clerk Typist Receptionist ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1986. Minimum Midpoint Maximum $2,592 $3,049 $3,506 2,387 2,808 3,229 1,953 2,298 2,643 1,809 2,128 2,447 1,537 1,808 2,079 1,486 1,748 2,010 1,306 1,537 1,768 1,255 1,476 1,697 1,221 1,436 1,651 1,182 1,391 1,600 1,151 1,354 1,557 1,014 1,118 1,232 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1986, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form City Attorney City Clerk - 2 - L4 J RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-07 AND ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE_. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace directed that an Employee Job Classification Study be prepared for all employees of the City, and WHEREAS, a Classification and Compensation Study, prepared by Hay Management Consultants, recommends certain reclassifications and salary range adjustments, and WHEREAS, said Study further recommends eliminating established Step increases and implementing open salary ranges within each classification, and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND DEMAND THE FOLLOWING SECTION 1. Rescission - That Resolution No. 85-07 is hereby rescinded in its entirety. SECTION 2. Classifications/Salary Ranges - That the following job classifications and sa ary ranges are hereby esta lished for employees of the City of Grand Terrace, and said salary ranges shall be effective January 1, 1986. TITLE Finance Director/Assistant City Manager Community Services Director/ Assistant City Manager City Clerk Accountant/Penance Office Manager Deputy City Clerk Administrative Assistant Senior Account Clerk Maintenance Lead Person Minutes Clerk/Records Coordinator Account Clerk Maintenance Worker Clerk Typist ADOPTED this 12tn day of December, 1985 SALARY RANGE Minimum Midpoint Maximum $2,592 $3,049 $3,506 2,387 2,808 3,229 1,953 2,298 2,643 1,809 2,128 2,447 1,537 1,808 2,079 1,486 1,748 2,010 1,306 1,537 1,768 1,255 1,476 1,697 1,221 1,436 1,651 1,221 1436 1651 1,182 1,391 1,600 1,151 1,354 1,557 ATTEST ze Ci y Clerk of th Ol ty of Gran Terrace and of t City Council thereof. Mayor of the, Ci tand Terrace and of the City Cobnci 1 there I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 12th day of December, 1985, by the following vote AYES: Councilmembers Matteson, Petta, Pfennighausen, Evans; Mayor Grant NOES. None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN- None ,i cs Ci-ty Clerk Ap oved as to 0 `LL--- I i City Attorney - 2 - DATE C R A ITEM ( ) ETA COUNCIL ITEM (X ) AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A 1 & 2 - ► ^lou - ►T MEETING DATE Mav 22. 1986 %� SUBJECT PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP/RECRUITMENT FUNDING REQUIRED _ NO FUNDING REQUIRED X At the City Council's regular meeting of May 8, Council requested that reconsideration of number of Planning Commissioners be placed on the May 22, City Council Agenda. Since that meeting there has been an additional resignation from John McDowell, creating another unscheduled vacancy. Advertisement for an unscheduled vacancy is normally done following Council's acceptance of resignation. However, if Council approves the Planning Commission membership be reduced to a 5-member Commission, Council will then need to amend the Municipal Code to reflect changes. If Council decides to continue with a 7-member Commission, Staff recommends advertising vacancy to fill unexpired term of John McDowell to expire June 14, 1988. Attached is a copy of the only Citizen Application received so far. Also enclosed is a roster of Plannng Commissioners and term expiration dates. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL (1) ACCEPT JOHN McDOWELL'S RESIGNATION, WITH REGRET, AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF A SUITABLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO BE SENT AND A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR PRESENTATION AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING, (2) CONSIDER REDUCING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO FIVE -MEMBERS AND DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE ACCORDINGLY. (3) IF DECISION IS REACHED TO RETAIN A 7-MEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION, AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT OF UNSCHEDULED VACANCY TO EXPIRE JUNE 14,1990. ID ac PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS First & Third Monday of each month. TIME 7 00 p.m., preceded by a Public Workshop Session at 6 30 p.m. PLACE Grand Terrace Civic Center Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA. 92324 PLAWING DIRECTOR Joe Kicak PLANNING STAFF PERSON Name, Address, Phone Numbers *(Unlisted) Appointed Reappointed Term Ends orman T. Caouette, Chairman 1/13/83 6/15/84 (2) 6/14/88 Address - 22491 DeBerry, #K133 -- Phone (Home) 783-2149 -- (Bus) 787-2544 Jerry Hawkinson, Vice -Chairman 4/14/83 6/15/84 (2) 6/14/88 Address - 22688 Fairburn Dr. -- Phone (Home) 824-2218 -- (Bus) 885-7576 Sanford L. Collins 11/15/79 6/24/82 (2) 6/14/86 Address - 22697 Brentwood -- Phone (Home) 825-6631 -- (Bus) 382-4017 Ray Munson 7/22/82 6/15/84 (2) 6/14/88 Address - 11809 Kingston St. -- Phone (Home) *824-6630 - (Bus) John McDowell 11/15/79 6/15/80 (3) 6/14/88 Address - 22690 Cardinal -- Phone (Home) 783-0486 - (Bus) (Vacant - Andress,) 6/14/86 iddress - -- Phone (Home) -- (Bus) Gerald Cole 1/8/81 6/14/86 Aadress - 23053 Peacock Ct. -- Phone (Home) 783-1882 -- (Bus) 684-4011 Effective April 24, 1986 e c=. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AS A MEMBER OF. fL69h.II.z4. ('vk.4ISSeo+•. NAME 4>I0 �L J �GCivC� ADDRESS HOME PHONE ��' 3 - 3 BUSINESS PHONE OCCUPATION. �%i-TTn►'Z.+r �c.1 EDUCATION• (List highest year completed and all degrees) %ReoL*Rw SQ oo I- / L+t-L' , J u.o : c b. J d r 4` Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? Yes ( ) No ( ) If so, please list eu,i, we)5, Why are you interested in this positions .l.tla 1`14 M.C--�o 1 tom..) t►�- What do you consider to be your major qualifications 1 aw ak�rn�. S the 1M �'1 vrt L owbi Lw c) J 3-¢ Nov..) J.. G+^ P M� v+i�• - c i.1 -4',rL- -TWO- 8 %-�o c Co w rt . •t - *t,_ 6 + C� C� «. JO Ivy e M It e�.� t11 �-� • -{'y,� �� a •, J lk ,.a a v � ' w � �„�, 1ST �"" J . REFERENCES lkK V. ,.�. �,�,�. � ,cam. bib- 11 o �zc9� �s1 ` 2 3 Please attach a written statement containing any additional nforma %Ltr- �Gfeel would be useful to the City Council 1986 �� C UPTY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE _:-aC E AGENDA MEM X �-T __ 7 _ _-_,:, es c_ :e May 5th, 1986 meet�- C Called to Order bRon Wright 6 05 (time) Tm Bldg 3 Of the Civic Center Committee members roll call (location) I P Ed 0 "Neal P Rol ,xx xl, �kRx LL 1x�bQ=x5xgxXxxx 5 Pomald P 9 '10 From Sheriffs office: Sharon Korgan (Crime Prevention Off icer)Absent Guests RECEIVED Laurie Pace KUMMFIM� CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Mf nuzes, action on minutes meeting Not read Tresure= re-cor z Non Correscondence - Business: For the record- Copy of letter from Ed O'Neal - trip report to Crime Prevention school in Sacramento. Membership Applications 1 - Ralph Buchwalter - deferred consideration 2 - Laurie Payce- O'Neal recommends appointment Wright abstained 3 - Thomas Semph - Recommend appointment O'Neal - 1 Reminded Acting Chairman Wright our operational instructions require committees to elect Chairpersons to take office in even numbered years No action taken 2 Made the obseration the committee should become active 3 Suggested the committee establish operating procedures CONCERTED CITIZENS OF GRAND TERR1°kCE 22608 Ninon Dr Grand Terrace, Ca 92321 Mav 2, 1986 TO: Distribution FROM: Ed O'Neal, Chairman ca-01 0 /�?j az SUBJECT Report, Sacramento Training, April 27-29, 1986 The Grand Terrace City Council authorized me to attend a train-ng course in Sacrame-i:o ?pril 27 thru 29. The "training" was conducted in the Sacramento Criminal Justice training center, 570 Bercut Dr.m Suite A by Mr Terry Chiono, an Associate with Tomasi-Duboise & Associates. The Course " Crime Prevention in the Schools" was promoted as 24 hours of advanced crime prevention training designed to teach crime prevention officers how to develop and implement crime prevention programs in grades K thru 12. By the e-id of the second day it was apparen` the program was a training travesty, a charade that should not be allowed to occur again. I slopped the third day. By this instrument I'm requesting responsible elected of,,' -'ice holders to initiate action which would assure government sponsered training programs provide trainees relevant material Distribution Senator Presely Assemblyman Leonard Supervisor Riordan Sheriff Tidwell Captain Bradford Yavor Grant GT City Council members Sharon <organ `^r Terri C'-i-ono Tomas_-Ducoise & associates Director, Criminal Justice tra_ni-ig center Chairperson Ed 0 meal Eternal L lgilonce is the pace of liberrg 783 13-1 Vvendell Phil►ns ( t 8 1 1 t 884) COMMISSION AAD COMMITTEE REPORTS MAY 2 2 1986 ,1 COUNCIL MEETING DATE May 22 1986 COUNCH:AGENDA ITEM 2 �� p TE May 6 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE Crime Prevention Committe SUBJECT- Membership application for Thomas Semph PROBLEM The committee is funtioning short three members Facts ALTERNATIVES SOLUTION - Recruit qualified citizens for membership REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF Appoint Mr Thomas Semph to fill the committee vacancy created by the resignation of Larry Williams, term to expire June 30, 1988. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SER`lICE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AS A MEMBER OF m E Pk E(JC)v I NAME /+O►K A S ADDRESS ?� �I e(,r1 ry C F wc;oz e i HOME PHONE 7 e 3 -,=� 5 a 7 BUSINESS PHONE OCCUPATION 0c--Pu i (f r —Z-L �ry dr�n.�Z��n U �c.�•��/ EDUCATION. (List highest year completed and all degrees) r re- LAw S� t-ft,:c: L Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? Yes ( ) No If so, please list. Why are you interested in this position vc: r ti �9N-� Tae4e-4C6 RN Bc: L ,y i71`e` .H r 'Ec Tc7 l�c�P TflC- 7C D0�n� A� Cz:w DRer2eD '7Z�C'c T/cam �•, 0" e Cc;cz.c,�r What do you consider to be your major qualifications? i r%rtzJ c� C Lm T I c 2 N, ti, t i t il,PS A N •o MTh' U c �� yt rt,U y L �cw+GS C`.4,v Qc� ��EvC7vL� REFERENCES RECEIVED 1 -�) e —7 7/ AeM S ? ,�5W 1 - 2 Rr �,G lf,,a HAUSc� - Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council RECT A P R 16 1986 0 ib r4MISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORT' - MAY 2 2 1986 i COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL MEETING DATE. May 22, 1986 DATE: May 6 COMMITTEE. Crime Prevention Committee ;� SUBJECT. Membership application for Laurie Payce PROBLEM The committee is functioning short three members Facts: ALTERNATIVES. SOLUTION: Recruit qualified citizens for membership Committee recommendations are obscure- one member abstained the second member first said no then changed to yes. The crime prevention officer has appointed Laurie as chair of Grand Terrace Crime Busters program. REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: 1*00 Committee is stalled on this application. Suggest Council made the decision without committee recommendations. If appointed, the Crime Prevention Committee recommends that Laurie Payce be appointed to fill the unexpired term of Susan Crawford to expire June 30, 1988. r 0 ,-�- C I T jOF GRAND TERRA( APOLICATION rOR CITIZEN SER`IICE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE S A MEMBER OF. ('►�� %�o icy � (' r,�,�; ---,� PME DORESS '�,� R C1 r) Von ! { )a C oa ^C! 1 c r :-'_r' ,-1 CME PHONE � � t--- -- �� J BUSINESS PHONE CCUPATiON -Z J DUCATION: (List highest year completed and all degrees) -q-r, 1-1 , !n ` 1 c) r er -1:s I a �-�nP rcL f �� ,�+ r -1-� ,� ►� ! Sal '1P S n �� ad m i ►1 i S-i-►'0. r curt. CF J o s+ c -e. ►re there any workday evenings you could not meet? Yes ( ) No ( If so, s3ease list: thy are you interested in this position. c.,oa-4-,+^r', � �rA v- nA-, oY, ) S IrPit irn'Y» 1�'1 C YE a/ (10 rn nn 0 n '�- �a -?" i^�(I v P, 13 h I ri i-1 -� c I e nr•-� i nc he -fo k E Par + I rt ehi Id �E-t- r r J rQ►� s That do you consider to be your major qualifications? Y P iTr�a1P-=r q,hprr��=' /}►3� 4�Dn U - P - +-�✓ ,1-,�✓P _L_ I��n�e L)1.._ c tEFCRENCES: QCtn j��) ,�,�'''� J, i'6 1 3. ?lease attach a wr,tten statement containing any additional information you feel would se useful to the City Council- RECEIVED ,'I-1 .5 q6 CITY OF GRAND TEPRACE ,�„}N o +r .��Ti!'NO3Y ..J 1 �L3 �p JABE,ARDO C,)TU1,Ti* -yamuS:ay UD FTE E, ti A-2'1SN DElPA �`1YE:vT 1 E STAT- _ t1CF—MY dr' PrITY :-'IVGD Grand Terrace .r.,l �,_,:a 23 MA', 15 1986 'u MAY 2 2 1986 MON01 AGENDA- sm 0 �� YEAR THIS i�0`,iTH LAST >-CivTH �."� Tn nAmr,, LAST YEART'IFE TQ � mN ST°UC_Upz _I� 1 1 5 20 4 0 11 20 -. 0 0 %,�:Dl.4L AID 16 22 84 91 r lkF--TO �OTJLISION 12 5 38 RZSCUE 0 1 2 2 n ., ..� j�� J l L-v!T l,'E `v ": _:BY 1 1 4 5 i17� .7�.S' 1I '"A3E t .t-- 0 3 8 5 —�,T�r, 1 S .GEL=Jri �JCUS 3 4 34 s s 16 '. -Ls =_ aLA��' 2 4 19 18 ASSIST OTHER kGEIICIES 7 18 30 ... TOTkL> INCIMITS 53 61 1 238 -1_~;' Lr, I -1 t .-11 - `iG L.lS J. �A AIR THIS , ON>,f'1 tl 1 +�j, LASST 10_ H �� _ . 0 ') 339 286 1347 161 r T rr+—, c7 182 - 450 897 188 '-ALL 521 736 22" 351 ^^r Ar,S 'MT-')V •-'—IrV'TT('\ Ar—TVT^T^-� n�'T C' f �air1� i—a J !H r . `n, i n'-r- i J'��l ' y j �.. I .1. _ _ T (, 1�r•„� i J _J 12 3 29 8ry3 3t4v('e QTIGATTC)OS 5 2 Q Q f 0 Z 3 10 12 lu 11 CO 5 4 $ : T TT aJv,- j rg 2 1 1 I_ � 8 Tt I ♦ y r, FIRST 'If' n. - r 2 S 6 15 14 48 1 9 66 10.nf-e parer?A:;7 1.4 - 4077 11 210 A2 4701 19 632 s DATE: r� May 20, 1986 T, 12.316 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XJ MEETING DATE: MAY 22, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. ADD -ON SUBJECT Notice of Completion for Water Line & Fire Protection for Maple, Vivienda and Burns Avenues. FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The project for Water line and Fire protection for Maple, Vivienda, and Burns Avenues has been completed by El -Co Contractors. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE REFERENCED PROJECT. JK/lh Attachment 0 f Recording Requested By City of Grand Tc, , ace When Recorded Mail to* CITY CLERK City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 CUUNCIL APPROVAL ce above this line for NOTICE OF COMPLETION s use Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a public entity of the State of California, that a public work of imprcvement has been completed as follows Project title or description of work Construction of Fire Protection System for Maple, Vivienda & Burns Avenues Date of completion May 22, 1986 Name of Owner, City of Grand Terrace Interest or estate of owner Public Right of Way Address of owner 22795 Barton Road Name of contractor- El -Co Contractors, Inc DATE %OTArr ►T C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE May 22, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7A SUBJECT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES SAFE IN SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSDIE COUNTIES THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SB 1199, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2550 OF THE STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE. FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Mayor Grant requested this Resolution be placed on Agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE) IN SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES. AC Enclosures ipFNDh%'G CITY MNCil, APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE) IN SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SB 1199, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2550 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WHEREAS, Chapter 14 of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code was added by Chapter 1350 of the Statutes of 1985 providing for the establishment of a Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the county and a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is needed to protect the safety of motorists on freeways, and WHEREAS, said City Council finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is needed to reduce the time spent by law enforcement officers responding to routine vehicle disablements, and WHEREAS, SAFE will have responsibility for implementing a freeway emergency motorist aid system in the San Bernardino/ Riverside County region, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace hereby requests that a Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies - be established in San Bernardino/Riverside County pursuant to Section 2550 of the Streets and Highways Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that members Governments/Riverside County Transportation Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies i Riverside. ' ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1986. ATTEST of the San Bernardion Associated Commission shall serve as the n the County of San Bernardino/ ity Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. - 1 - I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of 1986, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form ity Attorney City Clerk - 2 - The San Bernardino County Transportation Commissio SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENT A PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENT Wells Fargo Building, 334 W Third Street Suite 1C San Bernardino California 92401 (714) 884-827 April 28, 1986 Ms Ilene Dughman City Clerk City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Dear Ms. Dughman San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), in a ,joint effort with the Riverside County Transportation Commission, recently co - funded a consultant study to determine the feasibility of implementing a freeway emergency call box system in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties The consultant report showed that utilizing revenue through the implementation of SB 1199, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties could generate sufficient revenue to ,jointly fund and operate an 800 to 900 freeway call box system. The SB 1199 legislation enables a county SAFE (Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies) to impose a fee of up to one dollar per registered motor vehicle per year to finance, build and operate a freeway call box system within its boundaries. The SAFE system itself will be directed by a governing board composed of two members of the Board of Supervisors and seven city elected representatives, a subset of the SANBAG Board is contemplated The consultant report was reviewed by the SANBAG Board at the April 2, 1986 board meeting The SANBAG Board approved the report and requested SANBAG staff to initiate the implementation process for establishing a SAFE program in San Bernardino County The initial step is to obtain the approval, by Resolution, of the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities (having a majority of the population of the incorporated cities) To facilitate your agency's consideration of the establishment of a SAFE, SANBAG staff have enclosed excerpts from the SAFE consultant study These include the Executive Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations, a copy of SB 1199, draft resolutions, and population estimates for Riverside and San Bernardino County cities Should you need additional information, SANBAG has available a few complete copies of the consultant report You may also call Mr Wes McDaniel, Executive Director, or myself, Mr Kerry Forsythe, at the SANBAG office at (714) 884-8276 should you have any questions Your SANBAG representative is also informed on this issue C TIES CF AOELANTO BARS -Ow BIG BEAR -ARE CHINO COL -ON =CNTANA GPANO 'EQRACE LCMA LINOA MCN'CLAIR NP='11 =C nv-APIC RANCHO CtJCAMnNnA aF')1 ANCS PIAI _n CAV PPONARCINC UPLAND itr—navn i c .—i—,- �c c— Q=QNIPMNC I We would urge your agency to adopt the enabling Resolution for the development of a SAFE program in our county It is important that this action be in a timely manner Collections of the added one dollar on vehicle registration cannot start until the SAFE is approved and formalized. Early approval will allow collections to begin sooner, and the fund to grow while details and final approvals on the location and operation of equipment are worked out between the SAFE, Caltrans, and the California Highway Patrol. Other counties are currently considering implementing a SAFE program We would like to move our program ahead and complete negotiations with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol as soon as possible to avoid any hold up in processing due to a rush of SAFE applications from other counties. Riverside is already underway gathering Resolutions, aiming at our joint program. Please place this Resolution before transmit adopted copies to us Sincerely, 1 Kerry orsythe Assistant Director cc City Managers SANBAG Board Members Deborah Barmack CL-86-161 your City Council and Report to the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the San Bernardino Associated Governments nn a 0 0 4 MEMBER O -,R T HUR YOUNG INTERNATIONAL U L March 12, 1986 Mr. Ba:ry Beck Executive Director F_vers�de County Transportation Conumission 4075 Main Street, Room 302 Riverside, California 92501 Mr. Wesley McDar_el Zxecut_ver Director San Bernardino Associated Govern:,ents Suite 401, Wells Fargo Building 334 W. Third Street San Bernardino, California 92401 Dear Messrs. Beck and McDaniel: c J< a 000 Z2C0 �= m Ce- er Cr: PC =cx _--0 cos•a ssa Cal `c^-,a 92=^= TeI=�''c,�s (7's 850-NCO We are pleased to present our f1nal report on the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (S?_E). The report descr-bes San Bernardino and Riverside Countiesfeas_bility of developing a SAFE. T`,e study determired that the Counties can afford to ,^ole±__e-t e--iercency freeway call ooxes. ^ne revenues orov:ded oy S3 199 appear sufficient to finance a system of approximately 800 call Doxes. Tne Counties are able to cevelop SAF3s independently or jointly, however, the econom,cs are persuasive for a 30;r_t coeration. We have ep-}oyed working with you on this project. if we may be of furthel—,assistance, please contact me at (714) 850-9500. d—$ Very truly yours, Larry u Seigel of Artnur Young & Company March 12, 1986 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. What does SB 1199 enable counties to accomplish? SB 1199 enables a local courty SAFE to receive up to $1 per registered motor vehicle eacn year to finance, build and operate a freeway call -box system. 3 What are tre ma3or legislative/operational requirements and constraints 1 Legislative Requirements a. The SAFE must be authorized by a County and the ma3ority of the cities representing a ma3ority of the population in the County. b The SAFE authority shall consist of seven members: • Two members selected by the Board of Super- visors • Five members 3ointly selected by the affected cities C. The SAFE plan must be revie-ed and approved by tre California Highway Patrol (CP) and Caltrans. 2 Operational Requirements/Constraints a Revenue is limited to the $1 per vehicle registra- tion eacn year. b State agencies may prescribe call -box intervals that may be financially infeasible (i.e., 1/4 mile rather than 1/2 or one mile spacing). c The CHP will prov-de all dispatcz services of the SAPS system. k11 C ? costs will be reimoursed ov the SAFE. d Imolementation may oe delayed to enable the CHP to develop the recuirec d_spatcn capaoility. C. How might the proposed system be configured? The Los Angeles County syste-, has ooxes at 1/4 mile inter- vals Financially and operationally, other counties appear to favor at least 1/2 mile spacing in heavily traveled areas. At 1/2 mile, the -notorist is never further than 1/4 mile ahead or behind of a call -box It is feasible to nave di`=erentiated spacing based uoon the traffic density. A call oox system with 1/2 ;Wile spacing would provide coverage primarily within the metropolitan areas, considering the availaole £uncing provided by SB 1199. Alternatively, it is possiole to cover all ma3or n_grways in octi Counties more regularly by increas-ng t-ie spacing of t^e call boxes based on t ,e traffic density The boxes gill communicate witn a CHP dispatci center which will call for road service, emerge^cy help, or relay a -essage to a third party for ass -stance. C Wha_ is the approximate range of costs for a system? Costs depend on the technology used and the spacing of the -- call -boxes. Annual costs are comprised bf operating/ maintenance expenses and debt service payments for tie capital investment. Preliminary annual cost estimates are: Intensive Service For Heavily Widesoread Service Traveled Areas (858 poxes) (800 poxes) Operat::g Capital* Operatina Capital* $377,000 $657,000 $596,000 $587,000 *The estimates assume use of ex_scing microwave stations for the radio units E. What are the relevant technologies? Two technologies appear most likely to meet Riverside and San Bernardino Counties' needs. These technologies and ma-ior advantages/disadvantages are summarized in the following taole - 2 - Technolccy Description Pdvaztaces O_sadvantaces Cellular Radio signals 0 Easily moved 0 Theft transmitted to target and from hard- 4 Produces wire phones reports on 0 Cell cover - system status age and use • Modern tech- 0 Early in nology development • Transmit road ce^sus data to computer • Self checking • Vandal resis- tant • Call forward- ing • Weatner toler- ant Conventional_ Radio signals sent & Easily moved No auto - Radio to and from dis- ma tic patch center 0 Weatner toler- reporting ant • Produces reports on system status and use •0 Vandal resistant What types of financing alternatives are available? Operating and maintenance costs are normally paid as expenses are incurred during the year. The maDor capital investment required to build and equip the system can be financed over a period of years to "smooth" the cash outflow over the expected life of the system. We have identified three basic alternative approaches to financing the capital costs of the system - Revenue bonds or similar instruments could be issued to may for the equipment and its instal- lation with a portion of annual registration fees pledged to debt service. - 3 - • A leas-ng company could purchase and install the equipment and lease the system to the SAFE. Tax benefits under tz:s approacn :;.gnt reduce costs below the first cot=on. • Under a orivat_zat_cn arrancen ent a private firm could install, own and maintain the call boxes and sell the system's services to the SA='-7 under a service contract. Add:tioral tax benefits might be available under this arrangement, further reducing overall costs. G. What are the ma3or maintenance and operating concerns? Althouch the cost and degree of maintenance varies ,with the selected technology, ma:nte^arse does not appear to be a ma3or ccrcern. The ma]or operating corcer-is include • The cost and lead time fcr developing the C._P d,spatch capability. • Balancing State ace^cy cuidel=^.es, motorist con- venience and the ava_'_acle farc_ng. • Developing a rel_ao'_e and effective capability to oversee the implenentat_or, operation and monitor- ing of tie SATE system. A,otier issue raised by some jurisdictions is liabzl=ty. This has not been a maDor cons_de=ation in Los ;_i::geles' exper- ience, and all aspeczs of 1_aoility have not been fully explored. The SAFE agency snould consult legal counsel about this matter. H. What guidance would be useful to the Counties regarding SB 1199� The attacred report provides SANSAG, RC=C and otner )uris- dhctions with substant.Lal i-fcr*nation accut estaolishing a SAFE system The most important guidance we found in our study was• • Develop a specific and trorougn implementation plan. • Conduct a thorough and competent analysis and procurement of tie various tecrnologies. • Act as quickly as possible to begin the SAFE process. This is important for beginning the revenue collection process and receiging early CHP/Caltrans approval - 4 - i. What role may be appropriate for SrtiB?.G and the RCTC? The seven voting members of RCTC and a subcommittee of the SANBAG Board could serve as SA:Es Trey would provide an effective, economical and t=-e-sav:-g approach for SAFE administrat_ve and management se:J_ces. San Bernardino and Riverside can jointly form one SAFE having authority in both Counties. SANBAG and RCTC can form a subcommittee to act as the SAFE. Operating and staffing economies warrant consid- eration of one joint SAFE system instead of a system for each County. The SAFE system could be established as a project and re_mbursed on tre cases of expenditures and services provided. - 5 - EXHIBIT I-2 Page 1 of 2 SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIGHWAYS USED FOR REPORT INFORMATION San Bernardino County Riverside County Highway Number Hichway Number 2 10 10 15 15 60 18 62 30 71 38 74 40 78 58 79 60 86 62 91 71 95 95 111 127 177 138 195 178 215 215 243 247 371 330 395 Average Daily- NA\41 1 1 } Traffic .•1 rill : , \ I 11 MOU\I .4Ft 1 F • 1- 1 ,1 .. Estimates All - - •-- - , , 1 rlo ; E gOJa► ti \ 'I�i .. �, J/ J r 1 1111 ... / _ 1 O �• I 141I 1 _ " 125,001 to 150,000 r » 1 M4FINI CO.r► ' S.41HIN/. f[N11. 100,001 to 1750000 ,�-- - BERNARDIHO 1, 111 „ •,, r, . LI / , , .�... •Ilj 1 111 1 • 1 = �I,r 1 .-� ^'------- t - � _ 75,001 to 100,000 - �_ ' ____' — -- '01 1.140 '•. •11.1 1 1 � I 1 , \ .--------- V .. w 1 10 , 11 1 . • '� I A l l ' ,, D e r','a,sr • +•l 1 1 � + • C Rl,- tll .t11 i ,~��' ♦ + j , '1 4wr •r 1 ~ .�� • Nn~--`l' r rr . 4 , �` =.'l_ ,4I 1, 41r .t Y / { • � � 1** 50foo001 to 75 000 - [. • 1 f'I:.: • 1 , t 1 NIIf Nlr, V 1 StA.C1 ' 1 • • ,1 i _ 1.1 • ` 4 N/YI I • r1,1 I IN. M11r1 ' �,' J 1 , ,►w Ir1111,11 1 � J1 Y 11 25,001 to 50,000 r %� r= ..• , _ r "i I '-� �- - • 1 r• Iw .r Iw1•, �-- % rd _ 09 MH P� • 1 ,.., i.. 11111101AI1 MOUNTAIN 1 4 TUNA IIIMIAI � 111 . nw111 A, •�.�� ARIA 111111111/1/, • • ,. 1 ...... ' _' .., . 11 , 1/• 1 b n r u I �»�71,�----1• IMr4rY 4.IA �I r.uvlNa �,J 1\ J ( + 1 , Less than 25.000 To illustrate one financial scenario -- if San Bernardino and Riverside Counties implement a call box system with 850 telepnones as shown in Exhibit III-9, the financial situation is estimated as follows - Number of un,ts (124 Cellular and 736 radio) 860 Revenue $1,235,000 Annual Expenditures Capital Repayment (8% amortization for 10 years) 657,000 Operating/riaintenance costs 377,000 Total costs 51,034,000 A*-ount ava_laDie for administration and contingencies S 201.000 is showr above, w_tn a n_,_ot`:etical w,despread 860 call Dox system, San aernard�no and ?:.verside Counties would nave approxiT-ately $200,000 available for admin�strat- _ve and contin- gency expenses. These revenue and cost est_,nia=!s assume the following three points • $1.2 million revenue in the f_rst full operating year. • Increases in operating costs being covered by growtn in vehicle reg_strations. • A m_dooint estimate for each of tre two technol- ogies. Exhibit IV-1 is a prelim -nary estimate f or the two Counties. It is based upon the illustrative 860 w=desioread call box system (from Exhibit III-9) being pnased in beginning July 1987. It shows that it is possible for the Counties to establish a "s_nkirg" Turd which can be used :n the future. By July 1987 the SAFES might obtain almost $900,000 to use as a "sinking" fund. IV-5 VA A. CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS F':D R ECOM1-i.ENDATIONS 1. There appears to be a high level of interest in implementing emerge^cy call box systems in ootn Counties and througrout California. 2. Los Angeles County officials, the C_P and Los Angeles County's res_ce-ts appear to regard the call. -boxes as a valuaole service for public safety and convenience. '&-e ooxes are heavily used and receive high public a:prec_ation. 3. San Bernardino and ?_�,e=side Counties aocear to be able to finance a system w-tn approximately 800 to 900 call boxes. 4 A configuration wits a create.- ru.:.oer of call boxes may not be financ_a_ly v_aole, depending on the technology used. 5. Payments to C3P for dispatching are uncertain and may substantially :educe the funds available to ouuld and operate tre SAFE systerz. DMV costs are not yet decided. 6. Caltrans costs and potential subsidies are uncer- tain and need further exploration. 7. SANSAG's and RCTC's ex=sting governance structure and staff capabilities may provide effective and timely means of cc -ducting the SAFE authority operations. 9. A SAFE emergency call -box system appears to be achievable and benef.Lc_a'_ for San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. 10. Rapid decision-maki-c, planning and implementation actions by both counties could position the Counties ahead of otrer aonlications for SAFE approval and processirg by state agencies. V B . RECOMENDATIONS Exr.ioit V-1 on the follow_-c pace presents steps we have identified as necessary to move aread 4:th a SAFE system. These steps include: 1. Establishing a SAFE authority by ootainirg Counties and cities approval SANBAG and RCTC would be excellent bodies to ccriprise the SAFE autnority. 2. Notifying DMV that the SAFE authority is estab- lished and therefore the revenue collection process should begin. 3. Further investigating (including demonstrations and/or site visits) t^e available call-oox tech- nologies. 4. Preparing a more spec_f_c f_nanc_nc and casn flow - plan. 5. Conduct a study to deter-z=-ie more precisely the availability of radio frequencies, cellular coverage, and the number and locp.tion of base stations and other equipment. 6. Developing a better understanding of DMV, CHP and Caltrans requirements, fees and possible conces- sions. Negotiations should be started as soon as possible to secure the cest poss-ble arrangements for ooth counties. 7. F_nalizirg a detailed Sr. :mple-nentation plan and schedule. 8. Developing a request for olds and selecting an appropriate tecnnolocy. 9. Developing an effective publ=c information program. 10. Obtaining an opinion from legal counsel regarding the management of potent -al liaoility. If State agencies require acditional call -boxes, the Counties have several alternatives: V-2 San Doi nardino Assoc Ialod Govornmorils and lho Rlvorsido County Ti nnsporlallon Commission 11'rol Im Inn ry I M t)lemo_qtl. loll %;S;h(,d u Io for Fm twiloncy' o oYCOUNICS 1986 1997 19891 Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct NOT Dec Jail • Receive SAI L Report • County Etesolullons Establishing SAI L O • Cities Adopt Resolutions • Meetings with State Agencies • Notify DMV re Revenue Colli.c(lon O • Negotiate Agreements with State Agencies • Conduct Lngineering Studies CL- • Itivcsllgolc & Select TWinologles 4_ • Define rinancing Plan O • Obtain Counsel re Liability Q_ • Obtain Financing ON Prepare RrD for Equipment and Installation tL. • Select Vendors ON Prepare rinal lksign & Iniplemantatlon Plan o April 1 )bd • Installation (phased) Develop Public IlduCetlmt ' Program r K i L F F 1. Attempt to stretch out the financing plan to accom- modate the increased cost (longer term financing, phased implementation, aeferred capital payments, etc.). 2. Attempt to negotiate less demanding terms from the State. 3. Meet with Legislators to request provisions for raising additional revenue v-3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Page 1 of 3 Senate Bul . o 1199 Cli.A=r-R 1350 An act to add Sectaon 1311 to, and to add Chapter 14 (com..mencmg vnth Section 2550) to Divmon 3 of, the Streets and High-xays Code, and to add Sections Z4215 and 925010 to the Vehicle Code, relating to streets and highways [Approved by Covericr Septembe- 30 1985 Filed with Secetwy of State Oc-ober 1, 19M ] LBCISLA- .:. COUNSELS DIGEST SB 1199, Craven Service aLLhontY for freeway emergenc.es motor vehicle registration fees increase - (1) Under existing law, the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways ..-i the Califon- a Freeway and E=ressway System Tins bail would aLthcnze the ocard of sunervsors of a county and a majority of Luce cues wathi:n Lie county having a majority of the pcpulat;on to establish a seati,ce authoriy for :reeway emergencies witn 7 membe-s An established auchcnty would be author.: ed to impose additional fees, not to exceed $1 per year, on vehicles reb.stered wnthi n the county, as prescribed (2) Under existing law, redstr anon fees on motor venires maybe used for, among other things, sti eet and iugnway purposes This Dill would require the pavrnent of an additional regstrataon fee unposed by an authhority for motor vehicles un subject counties, except those exempted under law, and would require those fees to be disuibuted to the appropnate authority after deaucdon of admix stratave costs by the Department of Motor Vehicles The bull v:ould authorize an authonty to use the gees for the implementation of an emerge -icy motorst aic s} stem, as specified, on portnors of the California Freeway and Expressway Syste-n un the county The bill would authorize an authonty to ssue rev e-nue bonds rcr the purposes of the bi11 and to pleage fees as revenues, as spec.9ed The bill would authorize the Department of T-an sportatnon and require the Department of the California H,gh.vay Patrol to enter into contracts for the constructaon, operation, and maintenance of tie aid system x-th any established authonty, as spec-=ied The authority would be required to reimburse both depart -rents for all costs mcurzed under the bill. The people of the State of California do enact as follows SECTION 1 Section 1311 is added to the Streets and Highways Code, to read 1311 Upon dhe request of any Service Authonty for Freeway 92 60 APPEND 77 -� Page 2 of 3 Ch 1350 —2— Emergencies that has =pesed add tonal fees on veluc?es pursuant to Secticn 9250 10 of the Vehicle Coee, the department may contract witn the authority for the uistal?at:on, operation, and r--=tenance of emergency call boxes on portions of the Caufornra Freeway and Expressway System within the county The service authority shall reumoarse the department for 211 costs incurred under this section. SEC 2. Chapter 14 (comme^icing xith Section 2550) is added to Division 3 of the Streets and r gnu ays Coae, to read: C'aA,,r-LR 14 SER'vICE AL-r .OR= FOR FREz-,vAY EmERCE. NCIES 25M A Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies may be established in any county, if &e board of super-,-sors of the county and a maJority of' he cities within the county having a mna)ority of the population adopt resolutions provici.-ig for the establsnmerit of the authority 2551 An authority establisnea t_rider this section shall have 7 members, with 2 memt:ers se'ec'ed 'ov the board of supervisors and 5 memoers selected )otntly by t'^e a:"ected c ties 2;52 The authority rray con -..act and Tray undertake any act ccn,,eruent or necessa.-y to ca y out this chapter and any other law relating to the authority 2553 Any authority establus ed under this chapter, may impose a fee, not to exceed one dollar (S1) pe- year, on vehicles reg,ste-ed in the county pursuant to Section 9250 10 of the Verucle Code 2!Z4 The moneys received by each authority pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 925010 of the Vehic-e Code shall be used for the unpleme-itation, mai: tenance and operation of an emergency motorist aid system, mcluding, but not limited to, erne-gency call boxes and emergenc mechanical service patrols on &e portions of the California Freeway and Expressway System located within the county in which the at.thorty is established. The De:.artrnent of Transportation and 'he Department of the California High,vav Patrol small eacn renew and aooroxe plans for unDle-ne�itation of an emerge^c / r-iotonst a:a s'-stern proposed for any state hignwav route and shall be reunbu-sed by the service authority for all costs incurred kn authnor:ty may constrict and rr ar.^fain ti-e facilities of an emergency motorist aid system or it may contract .%-nth a private person or entity to do so 2555 Any service authority may, pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 5A3CO) of Division 2 of intle 5 of the Covernment Code, issue revenue bonds for the purposes of this chapter and pledge revenues to be received from the fees Sc.0 3 Section 24215 is added to tie Ve�,ucle Code, to read. 24215 When any Se -vice 4uthonty cr Freeway Emergencies has unposed additional fees on vehicles pursuant to Section 2553 of the Streets and Highways Code, the department shall answer calls 92 so Page 3 of 3 —3— CIL 1:50 and provide central dispatcl-wrig ser•.,ces for the system on the portions of the California Free vay arc Zx---essv,ay System w-iL in the county The department shall dete.-,.'-Lne and authonze tre service provnaers eligible to partzc,.pate .n the system. The service authonty shall reimburse the department for all costs incurred under this section. SEC. 4 Section 9250 10 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read. 9250 10 (a) In aadition to any other fees spec.ned in this code and the Revenue and Taxation Code, anv additional fees imposed by a Service kuthonty for Freeway F-mer genc.es pursuant to Section 2533 of the Streets and Ilighways Coce shall be paid to the department at the time of registration or renewal of regisrratson of every vehicle subject to regis-:ation under this code in the subject counties, except those vehicles &at are expressly exempted under this code from the payment of reg,.str aeon fees (b) A-fter deducting its ad r=.istr atzve costs, the department shall distribute the additional fees collected pursuant to subdi--zsion (a) to the authonty in the county in which they were collected. s2 -00 a APPENDIX C CITY POPULATIONS FOR RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNA..R.DINO COUNTIES (1985 estimate) Riverside County Barn�ng 16,000 Lake Elsinore 91000 Beaumont 8,000 Imarino Valley 55,000 alyth 8,000 Norco 22,000 Cat`-edral City 16,000 Palm Desert 15,000 Coacnella 13,000 Palm Springs 39,000 Corona _ 43,000 Perris 91000 Desert Hot Springs 8,000 Rancho Mirage 8,000 28,000 Riverside 183,000 I-id=an Wells 2,000 San Jacinto 10,000 I^_d=o 28,000 La Quinta 6,000 Total Incorporated Population 526,000 Unincorporated 323,50a San Bernardino Count Adelanto 4,000 Montclair 25,000 Barstow 20,000 Needles 4,000 Bic Bear Lake 6,000 Ontario 108,000 Cnino 48,000 Rancho Cucamonga 65,000 Colton 25,000 Redlands 50,000 Fo-tana 49,000 Rialto 47,000 Grand Terrace 10,000 San Bernardino 135,000 LcT;a Linda 11,000 Upland 54,000 V:ctorville 20,000 Total Incorporated Population 681,000 - Un_ncorporated 373,000 C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT ETA ► COUNCIL ITEM (X) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED DATE T MEETING DATE May 22, 1986 GRANT APPLICATION FOR LAW ENFORCMENT PURPOSES X A Resolution is required to be submitted with the application for the 1986-87 Crime Resistance Grant Program. The attached Resolution authorizes the Mayor on behalf of the City Council to execute documents relating to the Grant Application. It also expresses the Council's intent to undertake the project and agrees to provide matching funds. The total cost of the program is $41,636.00. The Grant amount being requested is $25,000 00. The City's cash match will be $16,636.00 or forty percent. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY CRIME RESISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION. TS bt RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES FOR SUBMITTAL TO OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING. WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace desires to undertake a certain project designated as the City of Grand Terrace Community Crime Resistance Project, to be funded ,n part from funds made available through State General Funds as authorized by Chapter 1215 of the 1985 Statutes for the California Community Crime Resistance Program, and/or federal funds as authorized under the Justice Assistance Act of 1984, Public Law 98-473, administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby authorize the Mayor, on its behalf, to submit the attached Grant Application for law enforcement purposes to OCJP and to execute, on behalf of the City of Grand Terrce, the Grand Award attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A for enforcement purposes including any extensions or amendments thereby. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide all matching funds required for said project (including any extension or amendment thereof), under the Community Crime Resistance Program and the rules and regulations of OCJP and that cash will be appropriated as required thereby. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant law enforcement expenditures controlled by this body. ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1986. ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. I, ILENE DUGHMAN, certify that the foregoing meeting of the City Counc, of 1986, by AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form 1-Cy Hztorney City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular 1 of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day the following vote City Cler Exhibit "A" Attachment 1 UFFFILE OF LAIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING GRANT AWARD The Uttice of Criminal Justice Planning, nereinafter designated "UCJP", hereby naKes a grant 3war of funds to 1 ) City of Grand Terrace hereinafter designated "Subyrantee" , in the amount and for the purpose and duration set torte in tnis yrant award, under the provisions of NJTE If subgrantee name exceeds 3U characters, indicate below the abbreviated name for warrants l juvenile Justice and Je inyuency Prevention Act of 1974 (PL 9J-14�) j} X Community Crime Resistance Program 4. Project Tit e (bU character 'maximum) 1. Award No. Grand Terrace Community Crime Resistance Program z. Project Uirector (Name, Address, ieiepnone) 8. Grant Period Seth Armstead, City Manager July 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987 22795 Barton Road 9. Federal Amount 1u. State Amount Grand Terrace, CA 92324 714/824-6621 o. Financial Utticer (Name, Address, etepnone) 11. Applicant Lasn Match Thomas Schwab, Finance Director $16,450 00 22795 Barton Road 12. Tot -a -Project ;,ost Grand Terrace, CA 92324 s/a $41,450.00 This grant award consists of tnis title page, the application Tor the grant wnicn is at=acne hereto as Attachment A and mace a part hereof, and the Standard Grant Award Conditions wnicn are attacnea hereto as Attachment B and made a part of hereof. The Subyrantee signifies its acceptance of this yrant award and agrees to administer the yr_ project in accordance with the terms and conditions set fortn in or incorporated by reterence in this grant award and the applicable provisions of the Lrime Lontrol Act, or other authority, i aenti fi ea above. The Subgrantee certifies that state and/or federal funds received will not be used to replac local funds that would, in the absence of such state and/or federal aid, be made availaole for :- activity oeiny supported under this agreement. ' OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING STATE OF CALIFORNIA =xecjtive Jirector, UCJP Gate nereoy c_^ti`y noon my own personal Kno"ieaye :-eat ouoyetec funds are availaole Tor the period ano Lur.iose or tnis expenditure stated above -;-,j- r s:.a i Jrr, , cer, Thomas Schwab ULJP Forn 5U1 Xevisea U3111166 ua 13. Gate UTticial 4u n raze to si b n for u0jran=e Name 9 Title Mayor Telepnone (714) 824-6621 Address 22795 Barton Ro Grand Terrace, 92324 uUoP u �: iLc US, J-u-' Item 5tare'Loc-zi Year FunG Program xeyion ENVIRUNMENTAL IMPACT NEUATIVE DECLARATION uENTLEMEN Attach vent a In accordance with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impact statements, an environmental assessment has been performed on the proposed agency action below Grand Terrace Community Crime Resistance Program (Title of Project The assessment process did not indicate a significant environmental impact from the proposed action, and the project will not involve any of the followiny- a. New construction projects. b. The renovation or modification of a facility which leads to an increased occupancy of more than 25 persons. c. The implementation of programs involving the use of pesticides and other narmfui chemicals. d. The implementation of programs involving microwaves or radiation. e. Research and technology, the anticipated or intended future application of which could be expected to have a potential effect on the environment. Consequently, an environmental impact statement will not be prepared. An environmental impact appraisal, which sianarizes the assessnent and the reasons why a statement is not required, �is on file at the aoove office and will be available for public scrutiny upon request. Sincerely, Seth Armstead (�)i�natjre Or ?roject Director or other autnorize� official) a Attachment 3 CERTIFICATION OF FURMULATIUN ANU AYAILAhILITY OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT UPPURTUNITY P406RAM I, Seth Armstead (Project Director or other authorized official) certify tnat the County of San Bernardino (criminal justice agency) has formulated an equal employment opportunity program in accordance with 28 LFR 42.3U1, et seq., subpart E, and that it is on file in the office of r r-im,nal Justice Planning (name), Grand Terrace Community (title), C:r,me Resistanne Prr)gr-am, 1130 K St., Sacto., CA (address) for review or audit by officials of the California Uffice of L riminal Justice Planning, as required by relevant laws and regulations. (Signature) City Manager (Title) kUdte)