Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
11-20-1986
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS November 20, 1986 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6 15 P.M. 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order * Invocation - Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh Day Adventist Church --*-----Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Staff Recommendations Council Action A. Awards to Crime Prevention Poster/Essay Contest Winners (Sharon Korgan) Grand Terrace Elementary Poster Contest my odd First Place Joaquin Keenan Second Place Keki Gurrola Third Place Terrace View Elementary Poster Contest Shawna Butrick First Place Kelley Frost Second Place Chris Kelley Third Place Terrace Hills Junior High Essay Contest ran Dang First Place Bryan Wiebeld Second Place Diana Gill Third Place B. Proclamation - "Family Week" November 23 - 29, 1986 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Adopt GRAND TERRACE, CA,, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 4, 1986, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW 3 Presentation to Outgoing Council Member (This item deleted at this time) 4. Conduct Swearing -In Ceremony for New Council Member (City Clerk) LEASE DO NOT REMOVE COUNTER COPY FROM LIBRARY. THANK YOUI COUNCIL AGENDA Staff i11/20/86 - Page 2 of 4 Recommendations Council Action 15. Conduct Election for Mayor (City Clerk) 6 Conduct Election for Mayor Pro Tempore (Mayor) RECESS CITY COUNCIL CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of Minutes 11/6/86 Approve 2 Approval of Check Register No. CRA112086 Approve �3.*A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT (*Added) AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE & AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE Adopt $30,000,000 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF i THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING i REVENUE BONDS (MT. VERNON VILLAS PROJECT) 1985 SERIES A, APPROVING RELATED DOCUMENTS & AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL i7. Items to Add/Delete * 18. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. 'They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request iremoval of an item from the Consent Calendar !for discussion. A. Approve Check Register No. 112086 B Ratify 11/20/86 CRA Action C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D Approve 11/6/86 Minutes Approve Approve Approve Approve E. Approve Christmas Tree Sale Adjacent to Approve Fire Station No. 23 by Grand Terrace Fire & Rescue Association, December 5-24, 1986 & Waive All Fees -r- !COUNCIL AGENDA 111/20/86 - Page 3 of 4 Staff Recommendations Council Action F Approve Settlement of Liability Claim Approve GTLC 86-02 With Wm. Peters in the amount of $106.86 G. Release of $25,000 Sanitary Sewer Improve- Approve ments Cash Deposit to Sister's of St. Benedict �9. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 110. ORAL REPORTS A. Planning Commission B. Parks & Recreation Committee C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee (1) Naming of Street D. Crime Prevention Committee E. Emergency Operations Committee F. Chamber of Commerce G. Police Chief H. Fire Chief I. City Engineer (1) Bus Shelters, Pedestal Post *(2) Notice of Completion - Vivienda Over- i (*Added) head Bridge Project (GTC-86-02) Approve Execution & Recordation J . City Attorney K. City Manager L. City Council 111. PUBLIC HEARING - 7 00 P.M. A. Tentative Tract Map 13364, Specific Plan Approve No. 86-4 - Terrace Groves a 96 Unit Apartment Project (Chaparral Pines, Ltd.) B. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Adopt OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO 86-4 & MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS (Tentative Tract 13364 - Chaparral Pines) 112 NEW BUSINESS A. Cable TV Rates v 'COUNCIL AGENDA 111/20/86 - Page 4 of 4 B. Special Runoff Election (1) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, , 1987, FOR THE ELECTION OF A COUNCTIL MEMBER AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF LAW. (2) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO RENDER SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, , 1987 (3) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATE- MENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, , 1987. (4) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 82 -14 PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF A TIE VOTE AT ANY MUNICIPAL ELECTION & MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS. ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1986, AT 5 30 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 12/4/86 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12 00 NOON ON 11/26/86 Staff Recommendations (*Added) Adopt Adopt Adopt Adopt Council Action 10V 2 0 1986 C-TYIIcz tI C-11-T IMIL1 4TM NOPEMBER 23 - 29, 1986 WHEREAS, the fermi Zy is the primary institution representing the backbone of our society; and WHEREAS, the family unit, our greatest strength and producer of all generations to come, provides the environment in which youth, who represent our future Zeaders, receive their earliest teachings of self discipline, values and mores, patriotism, reverence for life and the Giver of Zzfe, and all other virtues upon which the greatness of this Nation rests; and WHEREAS, the future weZZ-being and prosperity of our Nation depend soleZy upon the collective goodness, wLsdom, and honor of our individual c.tiaens who have been significantly molded by the inf Luence of their hA7re Lives; and WHEREAS, to encourage wholesome family life, it has become traditional for the President and Congress of the United States to proclaim the week in which Thanksgiving Day fa Z is as "National Fami Zy Week;" NOW, THEREFORE, I, Hugh Grant, Manor of the City of Grand Terrace, on behalf of the City CounciZ, do hereby proclaim November 23 through 29, 1986, as: "Fame Zy Week" in the City of Grand Terrace, and encourage all citizens to celebrate this special time with family reunions, feasting, worshiping, and other appropriate activities, focusing on keeping jlrwmZy members closely linked by establishing stronger family ties and preverving family traditions. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. This 20th day of November, 1986. I O�w4a y* E RESPOND TO PLEASSTATE CAPITOL Taft jaruitt SACRAMENTO ADDRESS ❑ SACRAMENTO CA 95814 TELEPHONE (916) 445 8498 DISTRICT OFFICES 1326 H STREET DON ROGERS ❑ BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 ASSEMBLYMAN THIRTY-THIRD DISTRICT TELEPHONE (805) 395 2927 115 SOUTH M STREET SUITE November 5, 1986 ❑ TULARE, CA 93274 TELEPHONE (209) 686 2864 Honorable Mayor City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Dear Mayor: COMMITTEES 198586 Vice Chairman Natural Resources Local Government Public Safety Member Rural Caucus I am writing to you because you are a recognized leader in your community. Enclosed you will find a copy of a legislative Resolution 460 proclaiming this coming November 23 through 29 as "1986 California Family Week." Celebrating Family Week is a young national tradition. The week which includes Thanksgiving Day has historically been selected. I am proud to say that California's cities and counties, and the State Legislature as well, have been leading the other states in giving recognition to this worthy celebration. Good -quality family life is crucial to the wholesome development of our future generations. Encouraging the celebration of Family Week strengthens society and increases the likelihood of our youth growing up to be law-abiding, civic -minded, self-reliant, creative and productive adult citizens. As you are a recognized and respected leader, may I suggest that you consider taking the necessary steps to have "Family Week" proclaimed in your community. Thank you for considering my request. DAR:rch Enclosure Yours r ly, DON ROGERS RECEIVED ;ITY OF GRAND TERRACE .�tArr T .64& Date 11/13/86 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: 11/20/86 AGENDA ITEM NO. ,2. SUBJECT: Resolution Reciting the Results of the November 4, 1986 Election FUNDING IS REQUIRED NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX Subject Resolution will be furnished as soon as the Register of Voters certifies the results and makes the information available. I anticipate having that information Monday, November 17, and will immediately notify everyone of the results and finalize and distribute the Resolution for adoption at the November 20 meeting. Staff Recommend Council ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ID RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 4, 1986, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW. NOV 2 0 1986 PENDING CIT'' COUNCIL APPRC\i - WHEREAS, a regular General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Grand Terrace, California, on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, as required by law and as provided by law, and WHEREAS, notice of said Election was duly and regularly given in the time, form and manner as provided by law, and that voting precincts were properly established, that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 86-32, adopted June 26, 1986, the election was consolidated with the Statewide General Election and the Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A" NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1. That the whole number of votes cast in the City except absent voter ballots was 2,723. That the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in the City was 196, making a total of 2,919 votes cast in the City. Section 2. That the names of the persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows Daniel Hantman Susan Crawford Edward A St Germain Tony Petta Barbara Pfennighausen r That the measure voted upon at the election is as follows SHALL THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ESTABLISH A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING MARBELITE STREET LIGHT STANDARDS (POLES) AND PAYING ANNUAL ENERGY CHARGES FOR STREET LIGHTS WITHIN THE CITY IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE TRAFFIC SAFETY, CRIME PREVENTION, AND TO PROMOTE NEIGHBORHOOD AESTHETICS. Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against the measure were as listed in Exhibit "A" attached. Section 4. The City Council does declare and determine that Susan Crawford was elected as Member of the City Council of said City for the full term of four years. That, as a result of a tie vote, and pursuant to Resolution No. 82-14, a Special Run/bff Election will be called and conducted to decide the election of Tony Petta or Barbara Pfennighausen to serve as a Member of the City Council of said City for the remaining full four-year term. Further, as a result of the Election, a majority of the voters voting on the Advisory Measure relating to street lighting did not vote in favor of it, and that Advisory Measure did not carry. Section 5 The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election, showing A The whole number of votes cast in the City, B. The names of the persons voted for, C The measurers voted upon, D. For what office each person was voted for, E The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against each measure, F The number of votes given to each person, and for and against each measure Section 6 That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated, that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, shall enter the same into the book of original Resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the Minutes of the meeting at which the same is adopted. ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1986. ATTEST ity Clerk of the City of G—ra-TnU Mayor of the City of GranU-7e—rrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof I, ILENE DUGHMAN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 20th day of November, 1986 AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney STATEMENT OF ELECTION RESULTS EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 86- Adopted November 20, 1986 CANDIDATES Precinct 442 Precinct 443 Precinct 444 Precinct 445 Precinct 446 Precinct 447 Precinct 448 Precinct 449 Absentee Total Daniel Hantman 74 42 72 65 89 83 98 112 33 668 Susan Crawford 174 100 208 154 121 184 117 117 70 1,245 Edward A St Germain 112 84 115 131 129 147 147 144 115 1,124 Tony Petta 164_ 101 187 116 121 122 109 107 100 1,127 Barbara Pfennighausen 157 84 137 106 172 128 123 114 106 1,127 Advisory Measure -YES 148 75 138 102 144 143 105 108 70 1,033 Advisory Measure - NO 194 127 210 175 178 184 197 184 141 1,590 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 211919 TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS 4,931 PERCENTAGE 59.1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 6, 1986 Ci�.�i ,-�.._ - , 1 I - u ,VJ i The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 6, 1986, at 5 30 p.m PRESENT Hugh J. Grant, Chairman Byron Matteson, Vice Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen Dennis L Evans Seth Armstead, Executive Director Thomas J. Schwab, Treasurer Ivan Hopkins, Attorney Ilene Dughman, Secretary ABSENT Tony Petta APPROVAL OF 10/23/86 MINUTES CC-86-47 Motion by Mrs Pfennighausen, Second by Mr. Evans, to approve the Minutes of October 23, 1986, as presented, ALL AYES, by all members present APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA110686 CC -86-48 Motion by Vice Chairman Matteson, Second by Mr. Evans, to approve Check Register No CRA110686, as submitted, ALL AYES, by all members present Adjourned at 5 33 p m. The regularly scheduled meeting for November � 38� has been cancelled. The next regular meeting will be held Thursday, November 20, 1986, at 6 15 p.m , preceded by an Annual Potluck Dinner at 5 00 p m , commemorating the City's 8th Birthday Respectfully submitted, r Secretary APPROVED airman COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOV 20, 1986 CHECK NUMBER (1) P4751 HEALTH NET (2) 16450 BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC (3) 16465 MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS l ttyi4t AJ % I t tt1 C'IJ` li�n z �._ i��.�t i _tvt a CHECK REGISTER NO CRA112086 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF NOV 20, 1986 MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR PETTA, 11/86 PROGRESS PAYMENT ON VIVIENDA BRIDGE ENGINEERING ON VIVIENDA BRIDGE TOTAL $ 15 67 16,803 60 $17,775 28 J I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA i 1 A4, THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER 7 .ETA C R A ITEM (3) AGENDA ITEM N0. C,P 1` COUNCIL ITEM ( ) DATE Nov. 19, 1986 T MEETING DATE Nov. 20, 1986 ,go SJBJECT RESOLUTION AMENDING LOAN AGREEMENT 1985 SERIES A BONDS FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X on December 1, 1985 the City Council approved documents authorizing the sale of thirty million dollars of Series A Bonds for the purpose of multi -family housing construction. The issue was structured with escrowed proceeds that require a conversion to permanent financing. The resolution put before the Council, prepared by our bond counsel, George McFarlin, makes the necessary modifications to the loan agreement and to approve the first supplemental indenture. The nature of the changes do not substantially alter the form of the indenture, but make ministerial changes to conform to the • requirements of the rating agency and the provider of the letter of credit. The nature of the changes involve timing of notices, the method of disbursement, and conditions relating to the provision of a credit enhancement. The First Supplemental Indenture and the First Amendment to the Loan Agreement is a very lengthy document and a full copy of this is available in the Council Reading Box. If you should desire a personal copy, please contact the City Clerk's Department. Staff . and bond counsel find the changes acceptable and routine in nature. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. TS bt 7 r AL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FIRST SUPPLE NTAL .INDENTURE AND =1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE $30,000,000 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE 30NDS (MT. VERNON ?ILLAS PROJECT) 1985 SERIES A, APPROVING RELATED DOCUMENTS AND _ZTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF WHEREAS, tha Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, California (the "Agency") has issued and sold its Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Mt. Vernon Villas Pro3ect) 1985 Series A in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000 (the "Bonds"), under and pursuant to an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") dated as of December 1, 1985, between she Agency and Seattle -First National Bank as trustee (the "Trustee"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of the Indenture and the Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Loan Agreement") by and among the Agency, the Trustee and F. C. Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (the "Developer") require technical and procedural amendments to reflect the requirements of the Letter of Credit to be provided by Security Pacific National Bank (the "Credit Facility") and as may be required by the Rating Agency; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Indenture, the Loan Agreement and related documents have been prepared for such purpose, and it is appropriate at this time for the Agency to approve and authorize the execution of such documents relating to the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, as follows: SECTION 1. The First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1986, from the Agency to the Trustee in substantially the form presented to the Agency at this meeting, together with any additions thereto or changes therein deemed necessary or advisable by the Executive Director upon the advice of Bond Counsel, is hereby approved. The appropriate officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to execute the First Supplemental Indenture, as amended, for and in 1. the name and on behalf of the Agency, such execution to represent approval of the final form thereof by the Agency. SECTION 2. The First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1986, by and between the Agency, the Trustee and the Developer in substantially the form presented to the Agency at this meeting, together with any additions thereto or changes therein deemed necessary or advisable by the Executive Director upon the advice of Bond Counsel, is hereby approved. The appropriate officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, as amended, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, such execution to represent approval of the final form thereof by the Agency. SECTION 3. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Incorporated (the "Remarketing Agent") intends to use an amended Official Statement in connection with the remarketing of the Bonds. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to review a form of sa--d Official Statement with the assistance of staff and to recommend any changes therein or additions thereto deemed necessary or advisable by the Executive Director. The appropriate officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Official Statement, incorporating any such changes and additions, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, such execution to represent approval of the final form of the Official Statement by the Agency. SECTION 4. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the Agency with respect to the remarketing of the Bonds are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the Chairman, the Secretary, the Executive Director, and any and all other officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions relating to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates, requisitions, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the lawful remarketing of the Bonds in accordance with the Indenture, as supplemented, the Loan Agreement, as amended, and this resolution. 2 SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. ADOPTED this 2Oth day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Secretary of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace I, Ilene Dughman, Secretary of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 20th day of November, 1986, by the following vote: AYES: NOES. ABSENT: ABSTAIN. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel Secretary 3. a" ly ,,OVAL NOV 2 0 1986 r01ItIC ► llfiCf�lDA )TE Pad � 8� ( CITY OF GRAP U TERF ACE PAGE 1 Tt 11/14/t( VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER CHECK REGISTER NO 112086 FER ALL PERIODS VGUCiIER/ - VFP DGR ---- VENDER -- --- -- --- - ITEM ITEM CHEEK CtEC1 tt1PBFr NUMI,Ek N4t'L DESCRIETION AMOUNT AMOUNT P4746 1660 POSTVASTfF-CCLTPP POSTAGL/METEP 19000 GO POSTAGE/METER 50G.00 19506.00 P4747 6720 SO.CA.EDISUN COMPANY - CASH PAY 10/3195CE 134 69 134.69 - - P4748 - - E739---- 50 CA CA5 COP-PANY--- ---- ---- CASH PAY 10/3195CG- -- ------i-[.i0 - - --- 12.10 ,749 f 7 2 0 SO CA EDISON UltIPANY CASH PAY 11/3,SCE 12 17 12 17 Pti750 L730 SO CA GAS COMPANI CASH PAY.11/039SCG 13.20 13 20 -- P47Cc i------3iE 3--- -HEAL-TH-NEi --- ------ ---MED. INS PETTAiii/86--- -- -15 67- -----i5.-6� --- - P4752 6720 SO Cl EDISCN COMPANY CASH PAY.11/4,SCE 23.30 23 30 P4753 6720 SO CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAY.11/59SCE 59.21 59.21 ---- �4-754-----6-730----50.-GA--C-A5--00&CPA+'-Y-------- CF5H-PAY-11/59SCG--- P4755 6631 SECUPITY PACIFIC NAT BANK ESCP06 FEE,GAGE CANAL 300 00 300.00 P4756 6560 SAN 6ERNARDINO VALLEY - WATER CONF.FFENNIGHAUSEN 10.00 10.00 -- - P4757-- --LAPR-Y-P-IC-KEi--REPPIP-SPRiNKLEP5ePAR 1-41 -34"5-37--- - P475B (720 SO CA.EDISGN CCMFANY CASH PAY 11/79SCE 18 00 18 00 P4759 BARBARA CONLEY - - - SUPPLIE52TOUR DE TEFRACE 352.79 352.79 4760---------673C--50 CA GAS-CONPAN -- - CASH- PAYs11/10s5CG- - - 24 44--- - 24.44 P4761 6720 SO CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAY.11/121SCE 43.03 43 03 P4762 E730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY ^ -CASH-PAY.11/129SCG 52.57 52.57 ' ---P4763- - -6531---- SHERIFF FLO-'1)-Tif)V'ELL ------ LAW ENFORCEiii/P6--- 46o345.00 461345:00 -- -- 16434 GAkY HARRIS RENT TIME CLOCK,TOUR DE TERRAC 233.50 233 50 1L435 - - - NEW CONCEPT VIVID RENTAL CLEAN/REPAIR VCR9 F/S 20.60 20.60 - lamb -1)AN-ifL HANTMAty HANTMAN9Pf)L-.SIGMS 6 5:00 --� ' 1643 COMMITTEE TO RF-ELECT PFENNIGHAUSEN,POL.SIGNS 110.00 110.00 1L43E EDWARD ST GERMAIN - - ST GERMAINsPOL.SIGNS 3C.00 30 00 1 1643L. SUSAN CPAWPOFD - -- - -- CRAWFDkD,PCIL SIGNS -- --------- -----Bi:00 - - -- --' 81.00 Q rI `Tt1EF EFU r1FrETS SUPPLIES,TCUE FF 1EFPACE N2 14 be Iti :HEEL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 2 lrit/14/Ft VOUCHES'/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VGUCPcc / VENDOR VErDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK :HECr NUrREk NUrFER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT lr 441 WILLIAr P PFTECS SETTLF.GTCbt,-C2,PETERS 106 86 106.66 - 11,442 - -- - JOHA CUNNIUS - --- ---- - - W.W.D.RE7FUNC,CUNNIUS- --- -------2.31----------- - c.31 - 1f443 FAUL M TEN BRINK W.W D REFUND,TEN BRINK 2.80 2.80 1c444 DOUGLAS FRAME W 6 D REFUNL,DRAKE 3 99 3.99 - 1G445-- -- -T W66-.D-kEFUNGiTD -R.i0-SVC-5-. 16446 1210 SETH ARMSTEAD LOCAL MILEAGES/A 22.75 22.75 47 1214 ARKO4 SIGN CC ,INC SIGNS FOR STREETS 481.71 481.71 ,2J -1644-8 1360 -[rA-S-T-A-Nr-HUR-Y--"T4-L-E-D-WAgE`R -80T-FLE-D-WA-TER, 1-1/-12 rC4G -26 * 50 26-5012 16449 1450 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN,INC. PROGRESS PAY.VIV.BONADIMAN 16,BO3.60 21 16,803.60 16450 1711 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF LIGHTS,215/EART. 9/86 124.15 s 124 15 L 4�-1 17-2-5 4OPMA+rT--GAGU-F-T-T E C AO U-E-TT-E-ri-i /-3 /-8 6-- 16452 174E CONSTArCE CHAPNAN CLEAN R/R,PARK,(4 DAYS) 80.00 80.00 16453 1751 CHEM-LITE INDUSTRIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, C/C 54.59 54.59 -1 D-EL-F-C-TS ICAO-6I3-T-.-----FL-0RE3CENT L-1GH-T5,C-fG ' 7- 4-9 A9----,`, 16455 1798 GERALD COLE COLE, 11/3/86 25.00 25.00 1E456 1840 COLTON, CITY OF W W.D.SERVICES,11/86 189551 55 18,551.55 < -- �7 A-VE HARGRA-VE-,--l-I/3/86-- -25:Q0 -- 25.00 , 9 16458 3155 JERRY HAWKINSON HAWKINSON,11/3/86 25.00 25.00 " 1E459 3163 HEALTH NET MED INS 12/86 164 22 5 MED.INS 12/86 246.33 MED.INS 12/86 246.33 MED.INS.PETTA/PFENN.12/86EN 232.11 - MED,INS.PETTAy12186 15.67 1-1-97-.-18-- 1646O 321E HYDREX PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL9C/C910/86 48.00 L 48.00 16461 4160 KLEEV-LINE CORPOkATION HOSE KIT95WEEPER 199.44 199.44 -- 16-462 - ------4470-- 1.ONA-LIND--fll&P-OSAL ------ TPASH-P-iCK-UP,PARK,-11/86-- -- 3$.35- 38 -35----- lf4t; 4656 DANIFL PCHUGH MCHUGH, 11/3/86 25.00 25.00 UCH�EC "` CITY OF GkANO TERRACE PAGE 3 TC 11/14/E6 1'OUCHEP/CHECK REGISTER FOk ALL PERIODS NOUCHEF/ VFDDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK I.UPIEk PUPBER NAME CESCRIFTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 1E4L4 46t4 MEkRY MOUSE HOUSE BALLOONS/HELIUP 27.56 27.56 ---164t�------4690----MOFfAii--t- NICH6L--, fNGiPrEERS----FNG:YIVIEN{�A FRIDGE-- ----956:01 -------956.01 - 16466 4718 PiORGAN AND FRANZ LIFE INS.12/86 14.50 -- - L I F-E -I N S 12 / 8 6 --- --- --- 21 .15 --- - _ -- -- LIFE INS 12/86 21.75 LIFE INS.12/86 21.75 79.75 1(,467 4890 JEAN MYEkS CROSS.Gl1ARD910/2-10/31/86 127.20 127.20 - J"4E8- -4-94-2 NAZARE-V--v-H*P�E-R-,HE"-iN5 -E -tEGAt--S-VC-5:9/P6 2 9547 90 --2 547:90- 16469 5450 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY MAINT.ELEVATOR911/86 190.50 190.50 16470 5527 THOMAS B. PAGE PARK CLEAN-UP,10/66 114.00 114.00 i 6471 PE E-TT-A i-P&L--.-i-&N 5 60.00 6 () 0$- 16472 5579 PEOPLE HELPERS, IPC. PEC.SVCS.10/6-11/1/66 19697.65 11697.65 16473 5581 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 3.39 '-- PETTY CASH RE1MB. 15.59 E TT-Y-C-A-5-H-R-Ei M4 6 . PETTY CASH FEIMB 6.20 PETTY CASH kEIME. 21.36 - - - -- -- PEi-T-Y- C A 5 H-R. E-I-M B - -4-2 : @ 3 -- -- - PETTY CASH REIMB. 6.91 PETTY CASH REIMB. 3.14 110.69 1(474 5595 PITNEY bC6ES POST METER kENT912/1/86-2/28/8 51 28 POST METER FENT912/1/86-2/28/8 51 28 102.56 16475 6144 RECO REFRIGERATION EOUIP.CO. MAINT. ON AIR CONDITIONER C/C/ 187.00 187.00 16-476-- 6369---ROLL-I-NS-gitkDI-EK-HUN-:FfR- -F-A-IiH-PERF-&RM-i-B()N -7i:00 PUBLIC OFF FOND 250.00 621.00 ---i b f 7 7-- ---- E-313 --- R S K--A S P H A t i-P E P-A-If---- -- R E S U R F A C-E- P/ L, C --4 5 7: 4 4 -- 16478 6502 SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF STREET SIGNS 141.72 T. RAFFi-e-fidG-. -85/ 9. -q$9i: r3- - 1(479 6555 SAN PERNARDIN09COUNTY OF DUMP CHARGE99/16-10/15/86 7C.00 - --- ------ - DUMP-CHARGE19/-16-10/3-5f86 16480 6614 THOMAS SCH6AB L.C.C.CONF,SCHWAB 29.84 - --- - -- -- -- `- --- --- -'--- - ----`- - --- LOCAL MILEAGE i SCHVAB-- - - *t:00 --3 3 - - - - - -- Ittit1 6655 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. SIG.MAINT.10/86 219 48 - - - -- - --- - REPtIk SIG.$APT/M.V. ---- - --- - - -- -17.60 - c37.08 '13(y+,4FG " CITY OF G F A P D TERFACE PAGE 4 Tf 11/14/f6 VOUCIEF/CHECK FECISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOLCHEF/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEP ITEM CHECK CHI CI IUPBEr FL) MrER NAME DESLRIFTIOP AMOUNT AMOUNT 1f4C2 1678 SK1PPEKIS T'S T-SFIFTS,TOLR DE TERPACE 1,340.90 19340.90 ---164b3---- ---6fi�1— ---S-MAR-T-&-F-;NAL-TRl5 Gfjf9P-ANY- ---C-AiVLY,HALLb+EEN-- ---103:86 ----103.-86--- 164P4 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY ELEC,2 LIGHTS,PARK 25.06 25.06 164b5 7t10 U. S RENTALS GFNFRATOR RENTAL 50.00 50.00 --- 1C4b6 -- ----- 73G9-- --UN;ON-UIL-C-f3.-0E-CAtifDRrri-a---- -GA-5,C-;T-Y TRUCK.--- ---4G}-33— A0-.3-3-- 8 7 7553 FRAN VAN GELDED VAN GELDEP, 11/3/86 25.00 25.00 1E468 7880 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY UPDATE,CAL.CODE 42.53 42.53 TOTAL CHECKS 98,006.45 I CERTIFY THAT. TO THE -BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. THE AFORELLST D CHEGKS FOR-RAYMENT E—CITY ITARILTTTFS HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY THTMAS SCHWAB - NANCE DIRECTOR 110 V % 1 i986 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 6, 1986 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 6, 1986 at 5 33 p.m. PRESENT Hugh J Grant, Mayor Byron Matteson, Mayor Pro Tempore Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman Dennis L. Evans, Councilman Seth Armstead, City Manager Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney Joe Kicak, Planning Director/City Engineer Ilene Dughman, City Clerk ABSENT Tony Petta, Councilman The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Grant, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson. ITEMS ADDED TO THE AGENDA - The following items were added to the Agenda 2C - Proclamation - Winter Storm Preparedness Week, November 17-22, 1986, 7C - Cable Television Rates (This item was later deferred until next meeting to allow representation by the Cable Television firm.) SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Bus Shelters - Kathy Bell, Pedestal Post Kathy Bell, representing Pedestal Post, 2855 East Coast Highway, Suite 100, Corona Del Mar, gave a presentation regarding proposal to install two Bus Shelters in designated areas within the City (Reference Pedestal Post's October 3rd letter and Staff Report dated October 30, 1986, Subject Pedestal Post Bus Shelter Special Presentation Following Council discussion relative to maintenance, landscaping, design, graffiti, utility costs, and liability, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant, to approve the installation of said bus shelters (It was clarified that the Motion included approval of the Contract by the City Attorney and approval of design by the City Engineer ) Councilman Evans, with Councilwoman Pfennighausen concurring, saw no necessity for an Architectural Review by the Planning Commission due to the standard design of structures Questioned whether proposal Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 2 could be categorized under minor deviations with Council approval. City Engineer Kicak saw no problem, however, requested Council direction with respect to permits and fees, since facilities will be located within public rignts-of-way Mayor Grant felt a more comprehensive staff report necessary to adequately address all issues. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson called for the question. CC-86-256 Motion by Mayor Grant, Second by Councilman Evans, to overrule the call for the question, carried, 3-1, with Councilwoman Pfennighausen voting NOE, and Councilman Petta absent. Councilmembers Evans and Pfennighausen opposed Mayor Pro Tem Matteson's Motion, feeling the Site and Architectural Review process unnecessary. Councilwoman Pfennighausen, in concurrence with Mayor Grant, felt all issues had not been adequately addressed and additional information should be provided Mayor Pro Tem's Matteson's Motion failed, 2-2, with Councilmembers Evans and Pfennighausen voting NOE, and Councilman Petta absent. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson suggested item be deferred until next meeting to allow vote by entire Council Mayor Grant requested additional staffing by Community Services Director Anstine and City Engineer Kicak to supplement information provided thusfar. Certificate of Commendation - Colton High Distinguished School Award Mayor Grant read a Certificate of Commendation commending the staff and students of Colton High School for receiving the Distinguished School Award Noted it would be personally presented by him on November 26, 1986. Proclamation - Winter Storm Preparedness Week, November 17-22, 1986 Mayor Grant read above Proclamation proclaiming the week of November 17 as Winter Storm Preparedness Week Copies will be provided to appropriate parties. CONSENT CALENDAR Item 3D, Minutes of 10/23/86, was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion CC-86-257 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, by all members present, to approve the following Consent Calendar items A Approve Check Register No 110686, B Ratify 11/6/86 CRA Action, C Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda, Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 3 E._ RESOLUTION NO 86-40 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEBERRY STREET AND ORIOLE AVENUE F. Reschedule Christmas and New Year Holidays to December 25/26 and January 1/2, G Reject Liability Claim No. GTLC 86-03 APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 23, 1986 MINUTES The following revisions to the November 23, 1986 Minutes were requested (1) Councilwoman Pfennighausen requested last sentence of paragraph 3, Page 3, be amended as follows "Responding to Councilwoman Pfennighausen relative to whether equitable and expeditious treatment had been received from the Planning Commission, Mr. Akar advised he would not have come before Council if he felt that to have been the case " (2) Councilman Evans requested Page 5, paragraph 6, Council Reports, include Mr. Rollins' discussion relative to consideration of the Terrace Hills Junior Hiqh School site for tennis courts, and was changed as follows "Mry Rollins advised that both the Pico Park site as well as the Terrace Hills Junior High School site was discussed However, due to Colton Joint Unified School District's recommendation that the land in question be used for future development of temporary classrooms as well as the exhorbitant cost factor of constructing the courts at the park site, the idea was abandoned " Additionally requested Page 6, paragraph 6, be expounded upon and was changed to read "Councilman Evans questioned potential problems with Gage Canal crossings relative to other parcels such as Barney Karger's which could result in a landlocking situation. City Attorney Hopkins clarified if right-of-way acquisition is made, the City of Grand Terrace would own the crossings, therefore, they would be public and available for access to future developments." Following clarification that Motion No CC-86-254 requires no funds by the City for the purchase of the Gage Canal right-of-way property, CC-86-258 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, by members present, to approve the November 23, 1986 Minutes, as amended above PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry Street, questioned and it was clarified that both the northwest and northeast corners of the DeBerry and Oriole intersections will be designated "No Parking" zones. Chester Easter, 21963 Tanager Street, (1) P.ecommended the Cable Television Company make some technical adjustments to improve the television transmission of Council meetings, (2) Requested and Oreceived clarification of medium and high density land use Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 4 Chamber Newsletter Larry Halstead, 21894 Vivienda, cited two paid political advertisements in the November Chamber Newsletter, understood the Newsletter was not to be involved in politicizing, specifically cited Councilman Petta's past positions. Unless there was a change in policy, felt rules established by Council and the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors have been broken. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson stated the City does not dictate the Newsletter operation Noted the Chamber derives revenue from advertisements Objects to political editorials, but not to paid advertisement as long as all candidates have the same opportunity Questioned and Chamber President Barbara Bayus responded no candidates were denied placement of ads. Mayor Grant did not feel previous Minutes would reflect that paid political advertisements were prohibited in the Newsletter, noted all candidtaes had an equal opportunity City Attorney Hopkins felt no rules had been violated and that the matter of whether or not paid political ads were appropriate should be addressed to the Chamber, not the City. Councilman Evans questioned whether the person accepting the ads was aware the Newsletter is not to be utilized as a political tool, felt the problem to be that other candidates had not been offered the same opportunity. In response to Councilman Evans, Sandy Windbigler, Chamber Newsletter Editor, referenced Council's last direction that no City editorials appear in the Newsletter and that the Chamber is to operate it as it sees fit. Direction to accept paid political ads came from Past President Dave TerBest, not the Chamber Board and anyone could have placed an ad. Ed O'Neal, 22608 Minona Drive, stated he had placed a Grand Terrace political ad in the Sun on Election day, which erroneously appeared in the San Bernardino edition, thereby not being seen by Grand Terrace voters, noting the importance of one vote, questioned what impact his ad could have had on the outcome of the Election Stated he would support whomever fills the two Council seats. Dick Kelsey, 22629 Lark Street, related the Newsletter is a vehicle to provide citizens information As a citizen, supports political advertising Chester Easter, 21963 Tanager, requested more City information in the Newsletter Regarding the Election campaigning, feels the town needs to pull together Felt the Newsletter can now be utilized by all for political advertising Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 5 Barbara Bayus, Chamber of Commerce President, advised that the Chamber has requested the City Manager to have a Staff person provide articles summarizing City items, however, official approval must be made by the Board of Directors APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION - CUP 86-8/TENTATIVE TRACT 2 SPECIFIC PLAN LAWSON TERRACE APARTMENTS Planning Director Kicak related October 20th Planning Commission actions with respect to Conditional Use Permit 86-8/Tentative Tract Map 13283/Specific Plan 86-5 for a development located on the easterly side of Grand Terrace Road, southerly of Vivienda Avenue. (Reference October 28, 1986 Staff Report Appeal of Planning Commission Approval for CUP 86-8, for Lawson Terrace Apartment Project, by the Property Owners. Related receipt of property owners' appeal, dated October 24, 1986, and outlined the reasons including high density (12 units per acre), erosion of rural character of area, water drainage and traffic problems (Copy of appeal on file with the City Clerk) Mayor Grant opened the Public Hearing Kenneth R McClellan, 21882 Grand Terrace Road, on behalf of residents opposing approval of proposed project, addressed various portions within the Environmental Assessment Checklist, feeling the issues were not adequately addressed therein, felt proposed project does not meet the necessary requirements and would in fact have a long-term adverse environmental impact for the reasons previously outlined by Mr. Kicak Additionally, felt project would increase levels of noise, light and glare, road deterioration, crime, and school impaction, would increase need for expansion of utilities, police, fire protection, maintenance, parks and recreational services, as well as alter the existing single-family land use within the area and obstruct current view of Blue Mountain. In summation, felt the proposed project to be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of current residents Requested Council give serious consideration before allowing the Conditional Use Permit to be granted The following residents also spoke in opposition to the project basically citing the above reasons Inez Stauble, 21945 Grand Terrace Road, saw a bigger issue with regard to the City s General Plan, questioned whether project is consistent with the people's wishes and if it would set a precedent for future developments, Lois Pierce, 21845 Grand Terrace Road, noting the property has only one entrance and exit, felt the proposed location will create a hazardous access problem in an emergency situation for both current and proposed residents, felt residents are not opposed to growth but concerned about type and amount Mrs James Ray, 21969 Vivienda Avenue, felt the project will adversely affect residents on Vivienda, Ben Gabler, on behalf of Viola Fields, 21952 Grand Terrace Road, emphasized existing storm drainage problems would intensify and the current rural Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 6 atmosphere would no longer exist, Larry Halstead, 21894 Vivienda Avenue, believed the project in the proposed ocation to be 1 high -density, regardless of what level of density the State considers y� it to be. Noted possibly the General Plan is the problem, however, for all the aforementioned reasons, felt the overall impact of the project would be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community, thereby giving Council the basis to deny the project and uphold the appeal, William Liles, 21840 Grand Terrace Road, concurred with prior remarks in opposition to proposed project. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, did not sympathize with property owners in the area who did not voice input when the General Plan was initiated. Suggested, if opposed to the proposed apartment complex, residents pool their resources and buy the property, noting the developer is within his legal rights according to the General Plan to build the proposed project. Rebuttals Lois Pierce noted the City Council was elected to represent the people and protect their interests, did not feel Members should take advice from Mr. Karger. Inez Stauble advised that the residents are not interested in the economics of the issue and do not want to buy the property in question, requested Council take into consideration all that has been discussed and review the Environmental Impact Report to assure all issues are properly addressed. Mayor Grant closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson related that some Councilmembers were not seated when the General Plan was updated, personally felt too much property has been designated R-3 and, if the areas are build -out as such, congestion will be created along with other problems previously mentioned by appellants. Therefore, felt it necessary to review the General Plan and place a moratorium on all building until that has been accomplished to arrive at a satisfactory solution. Agreed with Mr. Halstead's comments relative to the density factors (low, medium, high) as set forth by the State of California not necessarily being condusive to a particular community such as Grand Terrace, does not feel it takes many units in a small community to create high density. CC-86-259 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant, that a moratorium be placed on all construction in the R-3 area west of the freeway for a period of six months or until the General Plan is reviewed (It was clarified later in the meeting that the basis for the Motion was because of potential detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community.) Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 7 Mayor Grant, concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, felt that density — is in the eyes of the beholder and is directly related to the community in which it is located. Councilman Evans questioned City's liability if Council were to impose a moratorium on this particular project City Attorney Hopkins related his opinion that the Motion would not apply to this or any project that precedes the moratorium - Council would have to act on the appeal separately. Felt the moratorium itself does not create a liability problem. If decision is made to uphold the appeal and deny the project, findings must be made to support that action Related that individuals do in fact have a right to develop their property in accordance with the General Plan. The City's recourse would be to amend the General Plan in accordance with what is desired. However, in the interim, the project on appeal is in compliance with the existing General Plan and must be either approved or denied, which could result in litigation Councilman Evans supported reconsidering the entire City's land use. Related the following possible substantiation to deny this particular project (1) Density exceeds City's General Plan, (2) Fire hazard for ingress and egress to the project, (3) Potential school impaction. (Requested a report relative to anticipated generation of students from project along with proposed mitigation measures), and (4) Water drainage and traffic problems (Requested a report by the City Engineer) Based on those particular key issues, could not support the project Mayor Grant re -opened the Public Hearing. Bill Addington, 12055 Westwood Lane, Engineer of proposed project, related t e following (1) Project meets the General Plan requirements including density, (2) Views of Blue Mountain will not be obstructed, (3) All substantial issues addressed by appeal are existing problems, some of which will be corrected by the project (noted a new water line to be installed to resolve the current water problem), (4) Project has been reviewed by the Fire Marshall and will alleviate current potential fire hazard of the grassy field next to the mobile home park, (5) Although school impaction will be created, felt it would be minimal compared to students generated from a 40--lot tract, (6) 44 conditions have been included in the proposal to mitigate previously discussed problems, if mitigation measures do not meet the City Engineer's approval, the project will not proceed Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing Councilwoman Pfennighausen, realizing previous positions taken on projects such as this could have cost her Council seat, continues to feel bound to uphold the laws of the City including the Zoning Code and the General Plan Did not see tremendous problems with project, however, voiced concern with the following (1) Limited ingress and egress into the project, (2) Impact on park and recreational Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 8 facilities, felt City should require developers to provide for such on� or near the project sites Additionally, felt the City cannot impose inverse condemnation (moratorium) by placing an individual's property on hold indefinitely and openendedly without specificity. At Councilwoman Pfennighausen's request, City Attorney Hopkins outlined the lengthy process leading up to the City's adoption of the Housing and Land Use Element to meet compliance with State mandates which required compromise on both sides resulting in medium density. If the General Plan is amended to lower the density, Councilwoman Pfennighausen felt the chances of approval by the State to be slim. Voiced support of upholding the appeal due to the project not appearing to be well -planned, not because proposal is for apartments. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson clarified the Motion on the floor excludes the project in question. Motion No CC-86-259 carried, ALL AYES, by all members present CC-86-260 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, by all members present, to uphold the property owners' appeal of the Planning Commission decision and deny approval of CUP 86-8, Terrace Lawson Apartment Project, on the the basis that it is detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community Mayor Grant clarified no further action would be taken on the proposed project relative to the next Agenda Item for a public hearing and consideration for the approval of Tentative Tract Map 13283/Specific Plan 86-5 due to denial of the Conditional Use Permit Recessed at 9 00 p m , reconvened at 9 18 p m , with all members present excepting Councilman Petta. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - Minutes (unapproved) of the October 20, 77F-m—eeting were provided Planning Director Kicak related upcoming Planning Commission workshop study session on corridor themes, as requested by Council. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT - Minutes of the October 6, 1986 meeting were provided Dick Rollins reported on the Tour de Terrace Bicycle Event to be held Sunday, November 9 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE REPORT - Community Services Director Anstine related upcoming Annual Country Fair, Grand Terrace Community Center, Saturday, November 8, 1986 Mayor Grant encouraged community participation POLICE CHIEF REPORT - City Manager Armstead reported the following Increased patrolling above Palm and on Vivienda in an attempt to reduce crime in those areas, (2) Will provide Council with Quarterly Crime Status Report submitted this date as well as material on Shelters for the Homeless Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 9 CITY ENGINEER REPORT - Crosswalk - Canal/Barton Road - After reviewing — conditions at that particular location, City Engineer Kicak related staff recommendation that the above improvement be completed in conjunction with the improvements of Barton Road Widening (Reference October 28, 1986 Staff Report, Subject Crosswalk at Canal and Barton). Community Services Director Anstine presented slides of the area in question reflecting no improvements where the crosswalk is being proposed City Engineer Kicak noted, For the Record, that the proposal, as submitted by staff, is acceptable and could be completed in conjunction with the Barton Road project. Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned estimated completion date for the Barton Road widening oroject, saw no reason not to paint a temporary crosswalk in the interim, requested Mr Kicak inform residents requesting the crosswalk the reasons for delay, since the rationale of the staff report eluded her. Mr Kicak was unable to project completion since plans are still in review stage by Southern California Edison Mayor Grant supported the crosswalk, feeling it at least gives visual indication of crossing in that area to both pedestrians and drivers, additionally felt flashing lights should be installed. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson voiced support for Staff's recommendation - opposed the temporary crosswalk feeling it would be hazardous at night unless flashing lights were present Councilwoman Pfennighausen noted the majority of the people use that crossing during the day, questioned whether the temporary crosswalk without warning lights would increase liability City Attorney Hopkins noted he was not a risk management authority, however, felt liability would not increase as long as precautionary measures are reasonably taken Concurring with City Engineer Kicak's initial recommendation, Motion by Councilman Evans, Second by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, that the improvement be completed in conjunction with the improvements of the Barton Road widening project Councilman Evans had no problems with installing a temporary crosswalk, however, felt $500 an exhorbitant cost and questioned why two lines could not be painted by Staff. Community Services Director Anstine advised Staff was not equipped and felt that estimated cost was not out of line, however, Staff would install if Council desires. The Motion failed 2-2, with Mayor Grant and Councilwoman Pfennighausen voting NOE and Councilman Petta absent CC-86-261 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Evans, that temporary white lines be painted on Barton Road at Canal Street and maintained in good condition until the Barton Road construction project is completed and lights are relocated, carried, 3-1, with Mayor Pro Tem Matteson voting NOE and Councilman Petta absent CITY MANAGER REPORT - City Manager Armstead noted final results of the November 3rd Election may be released on November 17, 1986. Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 10 COUNCIL REPORTS Councilman Evans reported the following (1) Annual Country Fair - Questioned guidelines established by the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee relative to restricting selling of baked goods to only the Girlscouts, (2) Referencing what he felt to be false and inaccurate partisan material brought into the recent non -partisan election, questioned motive. Admonished citizens to examine voting records of each Councilmember and then determine whether past positions are consistent with their campaign promises Due to the time element of upcoming fair, Mayor Grant and Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt staff should imediately contact the Chairperson of the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee in an attempt to rectify situation, feeling everyone should be given equal opportunity to participate in the Fair Feeling it Council's responsibility opposed to staff's, Motion by CC-86-262 Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, by all members present, that the Mayor notify the Chairperson of the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee that Council sees no rationale to restricting selling of cookies and candies and, therefore, it should be allowed. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt recent application for Alcoholic Beverage icense should e investigated and, if warranted, recommendations made to the Alcohol and Beverage Control Board Mayor Grant reported the following (1) Attendance of the Omnitrans and SANBAG meetings of November 5, 1986, (2) Noted additional Chamber of Commerce budget information had been received. REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO 98 DEALING WITH SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES City Manager Armstead related Reverend Lucille Hays' complaint at the last meeting regarding enforcement of City's Smoking Ordinance regulations. �id�, Councilman Evans suggested disseminating educational material relative to the Ordinance through the Chamber of Commerce in an attempt to get businesses' voluntary compliance. City Attorney �i Hopkins related staff planned to do something of that nature either via the Chamber Newsletter or by letter from either the Chamber or the City offering staff's assistance in implementation of an enforcement program. Council concurred to encourage Chamber of Commerce's assistance to inform various businesses of the Ordinance requirements and solicit their cooperation CC-86-263 Relative to the smoking area adjacent to Council Chambers, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, by all present, to post a "No Smoking" sign in the refreshment area outside the Council Chambers Council Minutes - 11/06/86 Page 11 Adjourned at 10 15 p.m. The regularly scheduled meeting for November, T77778-67 has been cancelled. The next regular meeting will be held Thursday, November 20, 1986, at 6 15 p.m., preceded by an Annual Potluck Dinner at 5 00 p.m. commemorating the City's 8th Birthday. Respectfully submitted, City Clerk APPROVED - Mayor C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) ci ;T Z-44 MEETING DATE Novmeber 20, 198 AGENDA ITEM NO E- SUBJECT GRAND TERRACE FIRE & RESCUE ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CHRISTMAS TREE SALE Funding Required No Funding Required X Every year the Grand Terrace Fire & Rescue Association conducts an annual Christmas Tree Sale adjacent to Fire Station No. 23, with the Council waiving all fees. This year they are again requesting that the Council approve their request to operate a Christmas Tree Sales lot on the property to the west and adjacent to Fire Station No. 23 from December 5 through 24, 1986, and waive all fees. Attached are copies of letters submitted by the Forestry Department and a Hold Harmless Agreement signed by Ernie Zampese and Bill DeBenedet. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL APPROVE CHRISTMAS TREE SALE ON THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST AND ADJACENT TO FIRE STATION NO. 23 BY GRAND TERRACE FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION, DECEMBER 5 THROUGH 24, 1986, AND WAIVE ALL FEES. AC 22582 City Center Grand terrace, Ck (714) 825-0221 (714) 783-0277 GRAND TERRACE FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION Planning Department NOVEMBER 1, 1986 The Grand Terrace Fire and Rescue Association wishes to operate a Christmas tree sales lot from December 5, 1986 to December 24, 1986 on the property to the crest and adjacent to the fire station at 22582 City Center Ct , Grand Terrace, CA Attached are copies of the Countti Fire department approval along with the owners approval to conduct the sale holding the City of Grand Terrace and the owners Zampese & Debenedet "HARMLESS" for all liabilities for injury to persons and damage to property this matter Thank You for your attention of Dana DeAntonio 1 President, GTF&RA Y SAN tlL4 VA0.DIN0 rI i r PAMELA H THOMPSON Risk rl4anager County of San Bernardino RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION 777 East Rialto Avenue San Bernardino CA 92415 0780 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS John Joyner Fvs ., s r Cal McElwain Chairman Secona D+s in Barbara Cram Riordan *hrra JIs rri Robert 0 Townsend Fourrn ,:rs ni Roberti. Hammock Frrtn is ri ROBERT B RICNE` Admrnrsir a Off c� In the event of cancellation of the policies cr self insurance programs designated below it is the intent of the County oT San Bernardino to mail 30 days' prior notice thereof to Zailrese u Deeendcet Co. 22799 Barton Road Colton, CA 92324 1 c�27 The County of San Bernardino certifies that the following insurance policies and programs are in force As resl.eczs the CSA n381s Annual Christmas Tree Sale to be meld at the Sawn ana adjacent lot t0 22582 C1tf Center Court, Grand Terrace, froni 12/5; Sb to 12/24/86 from 7 a m to 60 p M daily TYPE OF INSURANCE COMPANY AND POLICY LIMITS OF LIABILITY POLICY NO PERIOD Bodily injury Property Damage Comprehensive General Liability incl Auto Liability self insured tndef ntte OCO, C00 41,OCO,CcC Excess Comprehensive General Liability incl Auto Liability Airport Liability I i Excess Airport Liability Workers' self insured indefinite Statutory Y no coverage a= � uJ � 0 I I i his Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by an authorized representative of the County of San Bernardino Risk Management Division 1 ; cc 0enni'Lr Verger, CSA -738 r, Date Authorized Representative' Earl -0-Et1,/, Assi S,urtt Ri Ck i ar,a—p - For Information regarding the above insurance programs please contact Plsk Llanaaement Olr,sron at (714) 383 3942 e November 1, 1986 Grard Terrace Fire & Rescue Association 22582 Citv Center Court Grana Terrace, CA 92324 We, Zampese and DeBenedet, owners of the property west and adjacent to 22582 City Center Court, do agree to allow the Grand Terrace Fire & Rescue Association to operate a Christmas tree sales lot from December 5, 1986, to December 24, 1986 on the premises stated above Since thlS Ls ae uthorizec fire depafzment activity ',e understana that the same acreemznt dated '\;CveT-Lcer 20, 1982, recardlrg the Christmas tree sale lot last year and tre cour.zv_ of San Bernardino concerning liability TSill still anz)l, to this activit� Ernie Zamp -e Signed idilliam DeBenedet - DATE Noy,. 13, 19 8 E -TAFF T C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO ZE SUBJECT SETTLE LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC 86-02 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Nov. 20, 1986 On August 13, 1986 Mr William Peters of 25334 Wanda Lane, Hemet, California was traveling east on Barton Road near Michigan when his car struck a pothole which caused his wire wheel hubcap to come off of his vehicle He pulled over to retrieve the hubcap and found that it had been run over by a following car. He has submitted a claim in the amount of $106.86 for a replacement for a Ford wire wheel hubcap. The normal procedure would be to submit this to our claims administrator to prepare a case investigation. In light of the small amount of this claim, it would be to the City's advantage to settle rather than expend the cost of investigating the claim. The City could then attempt to collect from the contractor whose street -cut created this condition. Please note that the warrant to pay this claim is included in the check register for this date. Should Council disapprove this settlement, the check will be voided. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL SETTLE LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC-2 WITH MR. PETERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $106 86. TS bt . -e STAI- REPOR7 November 12, 1986 9Ak R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) KETING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1986 LEND A ITEM NO. UBJECT: SISTER'S OF ST. BENEDICT RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. JNDING R-zQJIz=D 'Z,,, .. ,�n. .'1u oE (Iq ii4ED On June 30, 1986, the City entered into an Agreement with the Developer, "Sister's of St. Benedict, Riverside California, Inc.", which required the construction of Sanitary Sewer in Pico Street, easterly of Oriole. To secure those improvements, a cash deposit of $25,000 was posted. The requirements, as requested, have been completed. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE $25,000 CASH DEPOSIT. JK/LH HISTORIC -AL & CULTURAL COMMITTEE Minutes of the November 3rd Meeting The -neeting was called to order by Chain Viola Gratson at 7.10 PM. T;cse present were Vi Gratson, Ann Petta, Irene Mason, Pauline Grant and 1annah La.ister The minutes of the October meeting were read and approved Motion was -nade zy Ann to accept the minutes, seconded by Viola, all an favor. Treasurer's report shows $1,631.34 left in our budget. Country Fair Irene reported that she had a reminder ad on Cable Channels 36 and 15, also, a piece in the Chamber of Commerce November Newsletter. Articles will be in the Press Enterprise and the Sun Telegram. Pauline reported that she has sent letters to radio stations. She also sent letters to our food 3udges. Tony Petta has agreed to be MC, Fat Nix, Jerry Hawkinson, Hugh Grant and Tom Schaab have agreed to be budges. She has not heard from Clair Kidd. Viola reported that she has put posters around town. Irene will also be doing this. Ann has had 40 replies. We will ask the entrants to be there at the Community Center at 8 30 AM Committee members were reminded to wear their badges. Ann will made last minute calls this week Hannah will get paper supplies. New Business Letter from Joe Kicak associates aski:g for street name. It has been suggested that the street an question be named for ~Sake Todd who was killed in an auto accident. While we sympathize with the family, we are concerned that this would be setting a precedent We feel that streets should not be named for individuals unless they have historical significance We also feel that streets should not be named by auction. This could result in an ackward situation for the City and the Chamber of Commerce. Birthday Party for the City This will be November 20th, Thursday, at 5 PM to 6 15 PM It will again be a pot luck We are not going to advertise as the Community Room can only hold 50 people The committee members should be at the Community Room at 4 PM to start setting up. There will be no December meeting The next meeting will be January 5th, 1987 The meeting was ad]ourned at 8.30 PM Respectfully submitted, HANNAH LaISTER, Secretary RECEIVED 1986 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING DATE ACV 2 0 198E Comm"ISSION AND COYYITT�E REPORTS COMMISSION/COMMITTEE Historical & Cultural C:.nyu.ttee SUBJECT: Naming of Streets PROBLEM AGE. Z A lyti vj SG LJ C- \1 l� DATE 11/10/86 Facts in regard to the letter from Kicak Associates asking the ccunittee to name a street for which we suggested Hermosa Road in honor of the Hermosa Ranch, it has also been suggested that this street be named for Mike Todd who was killed in an auto accident While the Committee sympathizes with tl-e family, we are concerned that this would be setting a precedent we feel that streets should not be named for individuals unless they have historical significance The Ccmmuttee also feels that streets should not be named by auction as in the Benefit Auction Description Sheet received from the Chamber of Commerce This could result in an awkward situation for the City and for the Chamber of Commerce. ALTERNATIVES Cnl IITTnN REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF The Council's thoughts on the above matter RECEIVED �IG� 1 31986 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Cate: REPOR�l November 11, 1986 STAf R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) METING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1986 '-NDA ITEM NO. 1Or (-f) 3JECT: PEDESTAL POST BUS SHELTERS :DING REQUIRED rL1PiL` i:.0 REQUIRED The City Council, at their regular meeting of November 6, 1986, considered the approval of the installation of bus shelters as proposed by Pedestal Post. The staff, at that time, did not have an opportunity to review the proposal; and, therefore, this matter was continued This continuance gave the Staff an opportunity to present the proposal to the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of November 17, 1986 Based on the Staff review of the proposal, the Staff has recommended to the Planning Commission that the installation of the shelters be approved without further review by the Planning Commission. As of the date of this report, the Planning Commission has not acted on this matter. The recommendation from the Planning Commission will be submitted to the City Council verbally at this meeting. JK/lh DATE October 30,198 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 6, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO 02Z SUBJECT PEDESTAL POST BUS SHELTER SPECIAL PRESENTATION FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X KATHY BELL, PRESIDENT OF PEDESTAL POST, INC., HAS REQUESTED TIME TO APPEAR BEFORE COUNCIL CONCERNING THE INSTALLATION OF ENCLOSED BUS SHELTERS WITHIN GRAND TERRACE. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL OF PEDESTAL POST, ALONG WITH REVIEWING AND CONSULTING WITH OTHER CITY'S THAT CURRENTLY HAVE SAID SHELTERS WITHIN THEIR COMMUNITIES. NO NEGATIVE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AS OF THIS DATE. IN CHECKING WITH THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RTA), THE RTA CURRENTLY MAINTAINS SIX STOPS WITHIN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. THE LOCATION OF THESE STOPS IS REFLECTED ON THE ATTACHED MAP. AUTHORIZATION TO INSTALL THESE SHELTERS WOULD BE OBTAINED NOT ONLY FROM COUNCIL, BUT ALSO THE RTA, AS OF THIS DATE, PEDESTAL POST, INC., DOES HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE RTA FOR SAID INSTALLATION, CONTINGENT UPON COUNCIL APPROVAL. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: BASED UPON THE PRESENTATION, AND FAVORABLE COMMENTS RECEIVED CONCERNIMG THE PEDESTAL POST BUS SHELTERS, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF SAID SHELTERS. y Is_ , M PEDESTAL P F -IN MI-19 " A - - October 31, 1986 Mr. Randy Amstime c/o City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr. Amstime- Thank you very much for the courtesy extended to me when we spoke recently. Let me take this opportunity to outline our proposal to the City of Grand Terrace We at Pedestal Post would like to provide to your city with up to ten commuter shelters, strategically positioned at key bus stops. Our proposal is to install, maintain and service the shelter, at no cost to your city._ Additionally, we would solicit advertisers to p ra ticipate in t e program and provide us with tastefully conceived ads for display on the commuter shelters. We would, of course, return to the city of Grand Terrace 15.10 of all advertising revenue that we generate If the city of Grand Terrace were to accept our proposal the following benefits would accrue 1 Protection from the Elements Bus riders, particularly the elderly, appreciate the shelter from the direct sunlight in the summer, also the cover provided against the occasional winter rainstorms. 2 Security Law enforcement personnel agree that the illumination provided by the advertising panel offers a certain measure of security for commuters, especially in the early sunset winter months 3 Revenue Your city would receive a percentage of all advertising revenues that we generate It is important to note that these would be non -operating revenues, that is revenue without attendant costs 2855 EAST COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 100 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 I'E 4. Communications Opportunity. We would make available a percentage of unsold ad panes for the cit,, to use :;o disseminate public service oriented messages. As soon as you have had a chance to review this proposal, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you or your designate in order to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Sincerely yours, PEDESTAL POST, INC Cc' n Kathy Bell) President KB/ct TA WE AT PEDESTAL PGST WOULD LICE FCR YOU TO CONSIDER THE. FOLLOWING BENEFITS THAT OUR PROGRAM OFFCRS 1 Protection from the Elements Bus riders, particularly the elderly, aopreciate the sne ter rrom the direct sunllgnt in the summer, also the cover orovided against the occasional winter ,ainstorm. 2 Security Law enforcement personnel agree that tale illumination oroviaea oy the advertising panel offers a certain measure or security for commuters, especially in the early sunset winter months 3. Revenue Your city would receive a cercentage of all advertising revenue that we generate It is important to note that tnese dculd oe non-ooerating revenues, t�at is revenue without attendant Cos -Is 4 Communications Opcoartunity '1e wcLld ma<e ava,laole a percentage or unsoio as panels ror tie city to use to aisseminate public service oriented messaces We wculd aporeciate any guidance and input you may have regarding our program Tnank you for your time ano ccns:aerat.on 2855 EAST COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 100 CORONA DEL "vi-kR, C-k 92625 (714) 673-8422 r.. T 16r Al ...►. ,. • .{ SC T• ,pl- .1 r_-_ •.• Hw/► f Y t H r. furs s ll�+s 1 - .t,]_T,�-1,1� r / lS11LY111fftt11f 1 rise fYIR1•e-mirNlrffll— _ r 1 -- _ 1 • foot alum/ uult_A_ / I I ( wl y -AT I _,I 1±.- 11111 I. At,1! 1111111 h� 1 1 11 `s r :-\JVNG C.TY r; L.;4C,L ••�.rC%,%L LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between and hereafter referred to as L' TY A N 0 PEDESTAL POST, INC. hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE." WHEREAS, CITY is the fee owner of, or has heretofore acquired an easement for public street purposes over, certain real property within and WHEREAS, LICENSEE desires to construct and maintain shelters with commercial advertising thereon to be located upon the aforesaid property at bus stops and possibly other designated areas throughout the , and WHEREAS, CITY desires to permit the construction and maintenance of said bus shelters subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and WHEREAS, the proposed license and encroachment into the public right-of-way will be in the public interest and will not interfere with the use of said property by the public NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS All contract documents and plans referred to in paragraph 1 are intended to cooperate and be coordinated so that anything called for and anything not mentioned in the other or vise versa, is to be performed the same as if mentioned in all contract documents and set forth in the specifications and drawings. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties hereto This agreement and any modifications or additions hereto shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties and their successor and assigns 1 LICENSE City does hereby grant to LICENSEE a license to encroach upon certain real property as hereinafter specified for purposes of constructing and maintaining bus shelters with commercial advertising thereon at certain bus stops within the CITY (hereinafter "Shelters") in the manner hereinafter provided Said real property is either owned in fee by the City on an easement for public right-of-way purpose has neretofore been acquired over said real property by the CITY. 2. SHELTER DESIGN- Said Shelters and associated amenities shall be designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with and in conformity to those certain plans, specifications and architectural drawings heretofore aoproved by the CITY and attached hereto markad Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this refe-ence. 3. NUMBER OF SHELTERS Within a period of ninety (90) days after the issue date of a permit, LICENSEE shall install, construct and have in operation a minimum of ten (10) shelters, installed at mutually agreed locations and shall install additional shelters from time to time by mutual agreement of LICENSE and CITY, up to the maximum number of shelters which can be reasonably accommodated based upon CITY`s location and placement criteria. 4. COMPENSATION LICENSEE shall pay to the CITY a sum of money equal to 151. of the gross revenue received after advertising agency fees deduction each month from the sale of advertising on each Shelter installed under the program. THE CITY shall have the right to inspect the LICENSEE's revenue records. 5 COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS LICENSEE shall pay all costs and expenses for A The design, construction, maintenance and removal of the Shelters, and B. The restorinq to their proper condition of the sidewalks, curbs or streets which may be disturbed during the construction or removal of the Shelter, and 6 LICENSEE SUBJECT TO RIGHTS The grant of this license by CITY is subject to whatever right, interest or privilege others may have in the use and occupation of the sidewalks, curbs or streets where the Shelters are located. 7. OWNE,RSHIP LICENSEE shall be the owner of the shelters constructed 8 ADVERTISING All proposed advertising to be located on said Shelter shall not A. Display the words "STOP," "DRIVE-IN," "DANGER," or any other word, phrase, symbol or character which may interfere with, mislead or direct vehicular traffic B Comprise rotating, revolving or flashing lighting devices Az.7 ,advertising displays shall not deal with material ghich the City in its sole discretion dete rnines is offensive to community standards of good taste. The City will make the final determination on unacceptable advertising and such advertising must be removed by LICENSEE Avithin 24 hours of official notification 9 TERM The term of the agreement shall be for a period of ( ) years commencing on the date of permit specified in paragraph 3 herein_ 10 REMOVAL OF SHELTER Within ( ) days following the expiration of the term or this Agreement, or any extension thereof, or within ( ) days following termination of this Agreement as herein provided, or within ( ) days following written notification from CITY that said Shelter will interfere with any construction, maintenance or repairs of any public utility, public works or public improvement of any description or within ( ) days of a determination by CITY that a shelter location is not o n g e r appropriate LICENSEE shall, at its sole cost and expense, completely remove said Shelter and restore such property including sidewalks, curbs and streets to their proper and original condition in accordance with all CITY specifications 11 TERMINATION AND CANCELLATION In the event LICENSEE shall fail to comply witW any provision erein contained and shall not have cured such default within ( ) days after receiving written notice thereof from the CITY, or if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such ( ) day period, shall not have begun to remedy sucn default within such ( ) day period and continued to do so diligently and in good faith untTompletion thereof", the CITY in addition to any other rights reserved to itself under this Agreement or by law and not in substitution thereof shall have the right to terminate and cancel this Agreement Such termination and cancellation shall be by action of the City Council of CITY and shall become effective immediately 12 —TELEPHONE COMMISSION All telephone revenue commission derived from a public telephone attached to a Shelter shall go directly to the licensee regardless of whether the installation was initiated by the LICENSEE or the CiTY 13 BENCH REMOVAL In the event LICENSEE received approval to locate any Snelter at a location then occupied oy a bus bench existing under a permit from CITY, CITY shall commence proceedings for the removal of said bench pursuant to the Municipal Code and at the earliest possible date 14 INTERESTS OF LICENSEE The LICENSEE covenants that the LICENSEE has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services contemplated by tnis Agreement No person having such interest shall be employed by or associated with the LICENSEE It 15. INSURANCE A. Insurance LICENSE shall submit to the CITY certificates indicating compliance with the following minimum insurance requirements not less than ( ) days prior to the beginning of performance under this Agreement. 1 Worker's Compensation Insurance to cover its employees as required by the California Labor Code Before execution of the contract by the CITY, the LICENSEE shall file the CITY the following signed certification "I am aware of, and will comply with, Divisions 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code by securing, paying for, and maintaining in full force and effect for the duration of the contract, complete Worker's Compensation Insurance, and shall furnish a Certificate of Insurance to the City before execution of the Agreement " Tne CITY, its officers, or employees, will not be responsible for any claims in law or equity occasioned by failure of the LICENSEE to comply with this paragrapn Said certificate of insurance shall contain an endorsement wnich (a) Names and lists as additional insureds the City, its officers, and employees (b) Provides that it shall not be cancelled or materially changed without ( ) days written notice thereof given to the CITY by registered mail The LICENSEE shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees 2 Comprehensive Personal injury and Property Damage Liability Insurance, including automobiles, with minimum personal injury liability limits of 5-500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per occurrence, and property damage limits of $100,000 per occurrence Each such policy of insurance shall (a) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by which is admitted to do business in the State of California, (b) Name and list as additional insured the CITY, its officers and employees, (c) Specify its acts as primary insurance 0 41-1 l (d) Cover the operations of LICEVSEE pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 3. LICENSEE shall not commence the performance of its services under this contract until the above insurance has been obtained and Certificates of Insurance have been filed vith the City. lb ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event that either party hereto falls to comply with any of the terms of th s Agreement and the other party commences legal proceedings to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement or to terminate this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such suit shall receive from the other a reasonable sum including attorney's fees and costs as may be established by the Court or Jury. 17 ASSIGNMENT The LICENSEE shall not assign or otherwise transfer the LICENSEE's rights and obligations under this Agreement without prior written consent of the City Any such assignment without such consent shall be void and shall, at the option of the CITY, terminate this Agreement 18 CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Tne performance of LICENSEE's. services hereunder sha 1 be in the capacity of an independent contractor and not as an officer, agent or employee of the CITY. 19. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the City and the Licensee, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by both the the LICENSEE. CITY and CITY OF A Municipal Corporation LICENSEE ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM BY BY Title Tit I e 1. 11 MST OFTEN ASKED rUFSTiONS RE- BUS SHELTER AGVEPTISING Pow do you determine (and RTA control) site selections? The volume number of boardings and transfers at bus stops is the first consideration. To determine a high priority location, the number cf 50 or more boardings is required, however, we do listen to the ci`izens in the community and will consider recommendations from them, as long as the locations can meet city codes. 2. How do we resolve right to control ad content? The city or authority will have the right to reject an ad or campaign that is determined to be objectionable. Upon notification Pedestal Post will remove the ad in question within 24 hours Pedestal Post reserves the right to appeal any determination that an ad or campaign is unaccept- able. - 3. How does the company demonstrate (and guarantee) its financial responsi- bility? Statement from a bank stating that Pedestal Post has the financial capability to operate a bus shelter franchise in the city of Riverside 4. How break proof is the glass, and what vandalism problems are likely to occur? Tempered glass will shatter similar to a windshield. We don't get jaded -- sharp edges Ile use a cleansing solution that dissolves spray paint. Ve can control graffiti 5. Pho carry esfinsurance to cover liability for injuries connected with the shelters? 7 Pedestal Post carries insurance to cover liability for injuries and names — the contracting party as co-insured.---z- What length of contract is customary? Ten years is standard, however several of the new contracts are being drafted up at a 15 year period What are the sizes of signs to be displayed? Two illuminated panels that are 4 ft by 6 ft. Pow to resolve possible sight -line obstruction for traffic safety (especially at corners)? ' Le, e the shelter is located is deIci ,,i ,r-d on a c; se by case "'psis. Using setback , site plans must be drawn Lip to the city tole ?nd approved by the city. The shelter cannot cause obstruction to traffic safety or impede pedestrian or iheel chair traffic on the side %,alk 9. ghat are the company's refer,-nces? City of Colton - John Putton City of Irvine - John Parris Orange Coast College - Dr Gene Farris Wild Rivers - Greg Briggs 10 Might privately owned shelters interfere with RTA's ability to seek public funding for additional shelters? A city that enters into a privately sponsored commuter shelter program does not forfeit their right to public funding from any state or federal agency. 11. How many shelters would be planned for Riverside? We feel that 25 to 30 commuter shelters is an adequate number to start with for the City of Riverside Throughout the County of Riverside the figure of 150 commuter shelters is not out of line. "' w f " F7 September 26, 1986 Ms. Kathy Bell President Pedestal Post 2855 E. Coast Hwy. Suite 100 Corona del Mar, Ca. 92625 Dear Kathy: The City of Irvine has a contract for the installation and maintenance of bus shelters on public streets in the City. This ten year contract has been in operation for the past three (3) years. We are very happy with the specific contract, and the concept of public shelters in general. These facilities provide a significant benefit to our residents. Specifically environmental protection for our elderly and handicapped residents. we would be happy to recommend this type of program to any agency: Please feel free to have anyone who would like more information on our program to call me direct at (714) 660- 3693 Sincerely, C;O<H,N."��HARRIS Principal Pro3ect Engineer JH/ic DATE: 11-17-86 i � ' TA ► ■ AT 12.370 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( MEETING DATE. NOVEMBER 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 I ( 2 _) , ADD -ON SUBJECT NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR VIVIENDA AVENUE OVERHEAD BRIDGE (G.T.C. 86-02) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED xx The construction for the Vivienda Avenue Overhead Bridge located at the Southern Pacific Transportation Company crossing No. BJ-5409-A, has been completed by Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION ON THE SUBJECT PROJECT. JK/lh Re(,or d i ng Requeste( City of Grand Terrace When Recorded Mail to. CITY CLERK City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 PENDINvG' (ATY COUNCIL APPROVAL space above NOTICE OF COMPLETION is line for Recorder's use Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a public entity of the State of California, that a public work of improvement has been completed as follows Project title or description of work Vivienda Avenue Overhead & Tmprovements at On Southern Pacific Transportation Co Crossing; No BJ0540 9-A ((I(86-02) (Federal Aid Project 11BRR 54(,-355) Gate of completion November 20, 1986 Name of Owner, City of Grand 'Terrace Interest or estate of owner Public Right of Way Address of owner 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Name of contractor' Bonadiman - McCain, Inc Street address or legal description of site Vivxenda Avenue/Southern PaciFic Transportation Crossing; No B1-540 9-A f DATE tWu"" z J 6 r R=totj1 November 18, 1986 'IT 12-8. 5057 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (Xj 'MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. II A & B SUBJECT ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13364 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4. FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX Previously, in your packet, you have received a Staff Report for Tentative Tract Map 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4 for Terrace Grove Apartments. The amended report was delivered to our office on November 14, 1986, and delivered to the City for distribution to the City Council. Not included in this report was our request to iOentify the density for the net acreage of each of the parcels. Attached, for your information, is a listing of all of the parcels within the Tentative Tract Map, the number of units proposed on each parcel and density, which is being proposed for the net acre. It should be noted that on Page 17 of Specific Plan, in Paragraph D, it is indicated that the coverage of the lots vs. the landscaped area includes in the calculations the 7' parkway, which will be within the dedicated street It also should be noted that on Lot 15 the total coverage exceeds the allowable coverage by 356 sq ft. JK/lh Attachment s OENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364 SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4 TERRACE GROVE APARTMENTS NET DENSITY INFORMATION LOT # # OF UNITS NET ACRES 1 6 0.27 2 5 0.24 3 4 0.23 4 4 0.18 5 4 0.22 6 4 0 21 7 4 0.20 8 4 0.19 9 4 0.19 10 8 0 40 11 4 0.19 12 4 0.20 13 4 0 20 14 7 0 33 15 7 0 32 16 5 0.25 17 3 0.23 18 5 0.27 19 5 0 24 20 5 0.60 96 Units 5.16 Net Acres ® 12-8.5057 DENSITY PER ACRE 22 2 20.8 17.4 22.2 18.2 19 0 20.0 21.1 21.1 20.0 21 1 20.0 20.0 21 2 21 9 20.0 13 0 18.5 20 8 8 3 18.6 ave Dwelling Unit/Net Acre ' DATE: tok ;_7 — � � T November 12, 198( 12-8.5 57 —TA ► 1 ��7r I� C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM XX) MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO 6 SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4, FOR TERRACE GROVES APARTMENTS, A 96 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT. FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The Planning Commission, at their regularly scheduled meeting of November 3, 1986, considered Tentative Tract Map 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4. The Planning Commission, after a public hearing, is recommending that the City Council approve the subject Tract Map and Specific Plan. Attached, for your information, is the Staff Report which was presented to the Planning Commission at that meeting, as well as excerpts of the Meeting Minutes, not yet approved by the Planning Commission, with conditions made by the Planning Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL - CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4 2) MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS . A. SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4, WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL 1. to the general health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhoods of the proposed use or within the City; or 2. injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City; and; B. SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN, AND, C. CONDITIONS NECESSARY TO SECURE, THE PURPOSES OF ORDINANCE 57 AND THE GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING GUARANTEES AND EVIDENCE WITH COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS ARE MADE PART OF THIS APPROVAL. 3) APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS MADE BY STAFF AND THOSE MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, PND ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 86-4 JK/LH ATTACHMENTS a ,� RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 86-4 AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS. (Tentative Tract No. 13364 - Chaparral Pines, Ltd.) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace has adopted Resolution No. PC 86-04 recommending approval of Specific Plan No. 86-4 (Tentative Tract No. 13364), NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby resolve as follows SECTION 1. Environmental Review - That with respect to an environmental review of Tentative Tract-13364 and Specific Plan No. 86-4, an environmental review has been conducted and noticed pursuant to Section 21092 of the Public Resources Code, that based upon the review, including the mitigation measures, the City of Grand Terrace Environmental Review Officer found the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 2 Mitigation Measures - That this City Council does hereby approve said Mitigation Measures and finds and determines that said Plan as conditioned by said Mitigation Measures will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. Public Hearing - That a public hearing has been noticed, held, and conducted in the time, form, and manner pursuant to Government Code 65500. SECTION 4. Approval of Specific Plan - That this City Council, having reviewed the findings of the Environmental Review Officer and the testimony given, does hereby approve Specific Plan No. 86-4, subject to the mitigation measures and the conditions as follows, adopt the Negative Declaration, and instruct the City Clerk to issue a Notice of Determination Conditions of Approval as listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ADOPTED this day of 1986 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. • Exhibit "A" 10 Resolution No. 86- 12-8.5057 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, TERRACE GROVE APZ�RT.MENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 13364/SPECIFyC PLAN 86-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7 AND SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 86-12 1. If the above referenced project is approved, applicant and/or property owners shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances, Resolutions and development standards of the City. 2. The final *nap shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map act and submitted to the City engineer for review and approval. Approval of Specific Plan 86-4 shall expire, if not used, one year from date of extension not exceeding one year. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 13364 shall expire two (2) years from date of approval unless application is made prior to expiration. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Subsection (e) of 64452 6, the City may extend the per-od for a period or periods not to exceed a total of three (3) years. 3. Approval of this application constitutes Specific Plan and Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map approval only, and does not constitute approval of any sign permit, grading permit, building permit, or any other permit required by the City. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the necessary additional dedication shall be provided along all right of ways in accordance with the General Plan. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building pe .1t, a "Will Serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company shall ce submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. 6. Prior to recordation of final map, a letter of noninterference from any utility company, which may have rights of easement within the property boundaries shall be obtained. 7. There shall be an average twenty-five foot building setback from all dedicated street right of ways. 8. All private streets shall be constructed to provide for traffic index = 5 structural section. 9. The applicant shall conform to all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 10. All utilities shall be underground. 11. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscaping, irrigation and lighting plan conforming to the requirements of Title 18 shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 12. The applicant shall comply with the attached conditions or concerns per the particular agency requirements 13 All sewer bond assessments and otner fees shall be paid prior to final approval of map COW ITIONS OF aPPROVALO is 12-a 5-057 Exhibit "A" PAGE 2 Resolution No. 86- 14. Install standard street name signs as approved by City Engineer. 15. The developer or his engineer shall furnish fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. 16. A program of slope and erosion control shall be undertaken by the developer to preclude damage to the site and downstream property during heavy storm runoff, especially during the construction stage Any damage encountered will be the responsibility of the developer. 17. If there are existing utilities, such as irrigation systems and power lines on the site that are not shown on the Tentative map, these will have to be relocated in accordance witn requirements of the owner. - 18. Developer shall have fee ownership of all property within Tract boundary prior to recording the final map. Sub]ect property shall not be occupied and/or used for purposes applied for until the following conditions have been met 19. The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, the California Administrative Code, and plans approved by the governing fire protection authority. 20. A faithful performance bond in an amount equal to the estimated cost of uncompleted required improvements, plus the cost of administration, shall be posted with the City Buidling and Engineering Department, if the required improvements have not been completed at the time the occupancy permit is requested. 21. The planting and permanent irrigation system(s) shall be installed per approved landscape plan. 22. Screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the pro3ect, consisting of six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall. Prior to building permits, a detailed plan showing the decorative wall shall be required for review by the Planning Director or Planning Commission, if requested. 23. Any phasing shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 24 Provisions shall be made for receptacles for refuse within 100' of each building. Such receptacles shall be adequately screended from view, landscaped and snall be inaccessible to dogs, cats or vermin animals, and placed conveniently for collection. Frequency of pickup shall be such to prevent bver flow and emission of odor Enclosure for such facility shall be constructed of six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall or stucco washed concrete block wall and provided with solid wood gates. Enclosure shall have a minimum inside measurement of six (6) feet by eight (8) feet and be provided with six (6) inch high wheel stops located one (1) inch from rear and side walls Hose bib for maintenance shall be located within the enclosure. .r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL` 12-8.5057 Exhibit "A" PAGE 3 Resolution No. 86- 25. Sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the tract per San Bernardino County Std. No. 109 Type B. 26. A bond will be required, prior to final tract approval for all work in public right of gray, and easements. A grading bond will be required prior to commencement of grading operations. 27. k11 street names shall be co-ordinated with the Historical and Cultural Committee of the City of Grand Terrace. 28_ Trees, irrigation systems and landscaping shall ce as spec;fied in :he City of Grand Terrace's Standards for tree planting. The developer snall maintain all landscaping. WATER. 29. Construct water system in accordance Frith plans approved by Riverside Highand Water Company with fire hydrant size, type, and location approved by Fire Department. SEWER- 30. Construct sewer system in accordance with plans to be approved my the City of Grand Terrace. DRAINAGE: 31. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off -site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect ad3acent or downstream properties. The engineer shall submit a hydrologic report for the development. STREETS- 32. Construct curb, gutter and sidewalks in accordance with the master plan of streets. 33. Construct street with base material and pavement thickness as shown on plans to be aprpoved by City. STREET LIGHTS. 34. Marbelite street lights shall be installed in accordance with the recommendations of the Southern California Edison Company. 35. All conduit for street lights and other electrical service shall be underground. 36. Prior to recordation of the final map, deposit with the City, sufficient funds tP pay street light energy cost in accordance with the existing City policy. TELEPHONE- 37 Developer shall provide for underground telephone service for all lots. Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 86- CONDITIONS OF 3,PPROVAL 12-8.5057 _s �0a PAGE 4 38. Developer shall provide for gas service to all lots (units). 39. All utilities in the public right of way shall be completed prior to f anal street paving. BUILDING AND SAFETY REQUIRwqENTS: 40. A preliminary soils report, shall ;e filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 41. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Office of Building and Safety as required by Uniform Building code chapter 70. 42. Submit plans and obtain building permits for galls required my other departments. 43. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official prior to any land disturbance. 44. Pay the following, fees at the time the nuilding permit is issued A2ARTMENTS : Street School Park SD Sewer Total 375/Unit 1678/Unit 275/Unit 185/Unit 1500/Unit 4013/Un-t 45. That C.C. & R's shall address the rights and responsibilities of the individual parcel owners with respect to maintenance, landscaping and shall cover all of the convenants with respect to the various facilities that are jointly used. Also, -_ that said C.C. & R's are to the satisfaction of the flty Attnrnav and 'Zhall ho completed prior to approval of the final tract map. 46. To improve the easterly side of Canal Street adjacent to the property, all the way down to Barton Road, as recommended by City Staff, and must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. EXCERPTS FROM THE PLANNINGOOMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 0,1986 SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT 13364/SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7 AND SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 86-11 FOR TERRACE GROVES APARTMENT PROJECT. Motion by Commissioner Hargrave and seconded by Commissioner Van Gelder and passed by a 6-0 vote to add Condition #45 to Conditions of Approval, to read That C.C. & R 's shall address the rights and responsibilities of the individual parcel owners with respect to maintenance, landscaping and shall cover all of the covenants with respect to the various facilities that are 3ointly used. Also, that said C.0 & R 's are to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and shall be completed prior to approval of the final tract map. Motion by Commissioner McHugh and seconded by Vice -Chairman Hawkinson and passed by a 6-0 vote to add Condition #46, to read To improve the easterly side of Canal Street ad3acent to the property, all the way down to Barton Road, as recommended by City Staff, and must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Motion by Commissioner Hargrave and seconded by Vice -Chairman Hawkinson and passed by a 6-0 vote to recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4, and approve the Conditional Use Permit 86-7, sub3ect to the conditions as recommended by Staff and Planning Commission Motion by Commissioner Cole and seconded by Chairman Caouette and passed by a 6-0 vote to approve the Site & Architectural Plan 86-11 12-8.5057 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 3, 1986 FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER I A TENTATIVE TRACT 13364/SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4/ SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7 and SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 86-11 FOR TERRACE GROVE APARTMENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - At the last regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 20, 1986, this project was discussed in the Public Workshop Session and some formal discussion took place during the Public Hearing Session. However, due to the late hour, the Planning Commission continued this project, for further discussion and conducting the Public Hearing, to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting of November 3, 1986 Attached, you will find a copy of the Staff Report from the October 20, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting. PLEASE BRING YOUR PACKETS FROM THE LAST MEETING, WHICH INCLUDED THE PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT. JK/lh 0 12-8.50*1 51 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE FROM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT OWNER/APPLICANT LOCAT ION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 7kREA ZONING SURROUNDING ZONING. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION. SUBJECT SITE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 20, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT III B TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364/ SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4/C.ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7 AND SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR TERRACE CROVE APDRT.^'.ENTS, LOCATED NORTH OF BARTON ROAD BETWEEN CANAL STREET avD MT VERNON Chaparral Pines, Ltd 53 Royal St. George Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 The pro3ect is located north of Barton Road, between Canal Street and vacant land, which fronts on Mt Vernon Avenue. 275-241-30 6 9 acres 300,564 sq ft. A-P North = R-3 South = A-P East = C-2/A-P West = A-P/R-2 Medium Density Residential North = Medium Density Residential South = Office -Commercial East = Office -Commercial West = General Commercial The sub]ect site is located approximately 250' north of Barton Road and is bordered on the west side by Gage Canal and Canal Street, on the east by a ✓acant parcel of land fronting on Mt Vernon Avenue, on the north by a single family residence and vacant parcels and on the south by an office complex. AGENDA jT-°1 NO � -- --- ,.._.Tr- / / - _r�- 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1/2-8.5057 PAGE 2 SUBJECT SITE. REQUEST: PROPOSED DENSITY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: STAFF ANALYSIS Continued. The site is presently vacant. Britton Way, which is improved with concrete curbs and A/C paving and on -site improvements within Britton Way consisting of sewer, water and storm drain systems. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 13364 and Specific Plan 36-4. The applicant also requests approval, by the Planning Commission, of a Conditional Use Permit 86-7 and Site & Architectural Review 86-11, for the subdivision of 21 lots for 96 townhouse apartment units. These units are proposed to be clustered in 3, 4, 5, and 7 unit configurations. The project will be constructed on approximately 6.9 acres. All units are proposed to be over 1000 sq. ft. in size Each unit will have 2 bedrooms and a 2-car attached garage. 13 9 dwelling unit per gross acre. Not all areas of individual parcels were furnished, therefore, numbers of dwelling units per net acre could be computed. A Negative Environmental Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Community Development element of the City's General Plan states the following: "Specific Plans shall be required for all multi- family projects of 16 or more units and shall also be applied to low density projects. All commercial and industrial projects of 10 or more acres shall be subject to the Specific Plan provisions " The Specific Plan is authorized by California Government Code 65451 and must contain measures to implement the policies required in the Community's General Plan that pertain to the area. The Specific Plan must be consistent with the General Plan, in order for it to be adopted, the Community must have a completed General Plan. The submitted Specific Plan addresses the six elements of the General Plan listed below (based on new General Plan Guidelines) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPW 12-8.5057 PAGE 3 STAFF ANALYSIS Continued. z) Hazards B) Natural Resources C) Aesthetic, Cultural and Recreational Resources. D) Community Development E) Infrastructure F) Housing The Specific Plan may be adopted by either Resolution or Ordinance following public hearing by the Planning Commission and City Council. After adoption of a Specific Plan, no development, including Subdivision Maps, may be approved without conforming to the Specific Plan The Tentative Tract Map shall comply with the most current Subdivision Map Act and all the provisions required, prior to final recordation of said map. The Pro3ect site is governed by Ordinance 57, Section 7.030, Subsection F: "Apartments more than nine (9) units per acres." The Planning Commission may approve the Conditional Use Permit by minute action, while the Tentative Tract Map and Specific Plan need to be approved by Resolution. The Staff has reviewed the pro3ect for conformance with the minimum development standards of the City of Grand Terrace. Review of the Tentative Tract Map 13364 appears that lots 3, 9 and 10 do not meet the minimum widths as specified by Section 7.050. Britton Way is a private street, part of an existing lot of Tract 10586. It has been developed to a substandard section (30' curb to curb) with portions of the roadway existing on the property not owned by the applicant. Easements do exist for the benefit of the applicant, however, these would not be transferable by the applicant to the City. General Plan, Circulation Element, requires that residential streets be dedicated to a width of 60' and vehicular traveled way of 36'. Britton Way is substandard in each of these categories The proposed Street "A" through the (A-P Zone) Office Commercial as access to Barton Road from PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REP' 1?-8.5057 PAGE 4 STAFF ANALYSIS Continued. proposed development would create traffic problems in the office complex, as well as, with Barton Road traffic. As proposed, the right-of-way is substandard between northerly right-of-way line of Barton Road and the proposed subdivision. The access across Gage Canal, as well as, development of subject crossings shall be obtained prior to final approval of subject tract and the crossing fully developed prior to occupancy of any units. Majority of the traffic from the development will probably utilize Canal Street for access to Barton Road. Therefore, widening of Canal Street southerly to Barton Road should be a condition of this development. These problems should be mitigated as part of this development. In addition, other concerns should be addressed, specifically. The existing easement through subject property for the benefit of the property directly to the north shall be maintained and the access provisions shall be approved by a written release from that property owner. Portion of Lot 20 is now developed as parking lot for the benefit of the Office Commercial use to -- the south. At the present time, the required number of spaces can not be provided for the uses in the A-P Zone for the property and an easement on Lot 20 is proposed for that use Other solutions should be considered The existing zoning of the property (Tentative Tract Map 13364) is A-P. General Plan designation is Medium Density Residential. In the past, Planning Commission required a Zone Change as condition of the development. A letter from City Attorney on this subject is attached. It should be noted that common driveways are proposed between two (2) adjacent lots. This type of arrangement normally creates a maintenance responsibility problem. If, in fact, common driveways are permitted, at minimum, C. C. and R's should address the rights and responsibility of the individual owners with respect to maintenance responsibility. �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ART -12-8. 50 57 PAGE 5 STAFF ANALYSIS: 0 RECOMMENDED ACTION: FINDINGS: Continued. This pro3ect substantially meets the requirements set forth in Ordinance 104, Minimum Square Footage requirements for Multi- family residential units. All units are proposed to be townhouse style and will have 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, and a 2-car garage. The units will range in area from 1038 to 1139 sq. ft. The following is a breakdown of the proposed unit configuration: 1 Ea. 3 Unit Building 16 Ea. 4 Unit Building 3 Ea. 5 Unit Building 2 Ea. 7 Unit Building 22 Bldgs. 96 Units The applicant has submitted a conceptual landscape plan. A detailed landscaping, irrigation and lighting plan is required for review by the Planning Commission, prior to issuance of Building Permits as per Conditions of Approval. The trash enclosures are not provided on the site plan. As per the requirements of Section 18.48.060 Subsection N., each trash enclosure sahll be constructed in the manner set forth in this section and as per the conditions of approval. The illustrative Site Plan provided does not coincide with the Technical Site Plan. The Illustrative Site plan shows required 24 guest parking spaces. The Technical Site Plan indicates 18 guest parking spaces, with additional parking in the commercial property to the south of the pro3ect. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the following findings and take the following action. 1.) Specific Plan 86-4, will not be detrimental a.) to the general health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhoods of the proposed use or within the City, or b.) in3urious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City, and; 2.) Specific Plan 86-4 is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan, and, s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 12-8.5057 PAGE 6 FINDINGS 0 Continued. 3.) Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of Ordinance 57 and the General Plan, including guarantees and evidence with compliance with conditions are made part of this approval. The Planning commission make the following findings regarding the Conditional Use Permit 86-7: A The proposed use will not be detrimental- 1 ) to the general health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or within the City, or, 2.) in3urious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City, and, B. The proposed use will be constructed in the neighborhood or within the City, and, C. The conditions necessary to secure the purposes of this section, including guarantees, and evidence of compliance with conditions are made part of the Conditional Use Permit approval. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1. CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13364/SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7. 2. CONSIDER TESTIMONY GIVEN AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT 13364 /SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4 TO THE CITY COUNCIL, SUBJECT TO MITIGATIONS OF ALL CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES IN THIS REPORT. 3. APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 4. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLAN, BUT RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE A DETAILED LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION AND LIGHTING PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. JK/lh Attachments: Vicinity Map Conditions of Approval Agenclf responses Letter from City Attorney Resolution Plans i s SON VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE. TERRACE GROVE APARTMENTS Assessor's Parcel #: 275-251-30 n 12-8.5057 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TERRACE GROVE APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 13364/SPECIFIC PLAN 86-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-7 AND SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 86-12 1. If the above referenced project is approved, applicant and/or property owners shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances, Resolutions and development standards of the City. 2. The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Approval of Specific Plan 86-4 shall expire, if not used, one year from date of extension not exceeding one year. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 13364 shall expire two (2) years from date of approval unless application is made prior to expiration. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Subsection (e) of 64452 6, the City may extend the period for a period or periods not to exceed a total of three (3) years. 3. Approval of this application constitutes Specific Plan and Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map approval only, and does not constitute approval of any sign permit, grading permit, building permit, or any other permit required by the City. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the necessary additional dedication shall be provided along all right of ways in accordance with the General Plan. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a "Will Serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. 6. Prior to recordation of final map, a letter of noninterference from any utility company, which may have rights of easement within the property boundaries shall be obtained. 7. There shall be an average twenty-five foot building setback from all dedicated street right of ways. 8. All private streets shall be constructed to provide for traffic index = 5 structural section. 9. The applicant shall conform to all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 10. All utilities shall be underground. 11. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscaping, irrigation and lighting plan conforming to the requirements of Title 18 shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 12. The applicant shall comply with the attached conditions or concerns per the particular agency requirements. 13. All sewer bond assessments and other fees shall be paid prior to final approval of map • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 12-8 5057 PAGE 2 14. Install standard street name signs as approved by City Engineer. 15. The developer or his engineer shall furnish fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. 16. A program of slope and erosion control shall be undertaken by the developer to preclude damage to the site and downstream property during heavy storm runoff, especially during the construction stage Any damage encountered will be the responsibility of the developer. 17. If there are existing utilities, such as irrigation systems and power lines on the site that are not shown on the Tentative map, these will have to be relocated in accordance with requirements of the owner. 18. Developer shall have fee ownership of all property within Tract boundary prior to recording the final map. Sub3ect property shall not be occupied and/or used for purposes applied for until the following conditions have been met 19. The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, the California Administrative Code, and plans approved by the governing fire protection authority. 20. A faithful performance bond in an amount equal to the estimated cost of uncompleted required improvements, plus the cost of administration, shall be posted with the City Buidling and Engineering Department, if the required improvements have not been completed at the time the occupancy permit is requested. 21. The planting and permanent irrigation system(s) shall be installed per approved landscape plan. 22. Screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the pro3ect, consisting of six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall. Prior to building permits, a detailed plan showing the decorative wall shall be required for review by the Planning Director or Planning Commission, if requested. 23. Any phasing shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 24. Provisions shall be made for receptacles for refuse within 100' of each building. Such receptacles shall be adequately screended from view, landscaped and shall be inaccessible to dogs, cats or vermin animals, and placed conveniently for collection. Frequency of pickup shall be such to prevent 'over flow and emission of odor Enclosure for such facility shall be constructed of six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall or stucco washed concrete block wall and provided with solid wood gates. Enclosure shall have a minimum inside measurement of six (6) feet by eight (8) feet and be provided with six (6) inch high wheel stops located one (1) inch from rear and side walls. Hose bib for maintenance shall be located within the enclosure. 9 _ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 12-8.5057 PAGE 3 25. Sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the tract per San Bernardino County Std. No. 109 Type B. 26. A bond will be required, prior to final tract approval for all work in public right of way, and easements. A grading bond will be required prior to commencement of grading operations. 4, 27. All street names shall be co-ordinated with the Historical and Cultural Committee of the City of Grand Terrace. 28. Trees, irrigation systems and landscaping shall be as specified in the City of Grand Terrace's Standards for tree planting. The developer shall maintain all landscaping. WATER: 29. Construct water system in accordance with plans approved by Riverside Highand Water Company with fire hydrant size, type, and location approved by Fire Department. SEWER: 30. Construct sewer system in accordance with plans to be approved by the City of Grand Terrace. DRAINAGE: 31. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off -site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. The engineer shall submit a hydrologic report for the development. STREETS: 32. Construct curb, gutter and sidewalks in accordance with the master plan of streets. 33. Construct street with base material and pavement thickness as shown on plans to be aprpoved by City. STREET LIGHTS: 34. Marbelite street lights shall be installed in accordance with the recommendations of the Southern California Edison Company. 35. All conduit for street lights and other electrical service shall be underground. 36. Prior to recordation of the final map, deposit with the City, sufficient funds tp pay street light energy cost in accordance with the existing City policy. TELEPHONE: 37. Developer shall provide for underground telephone service for all lots. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 12-8. 5057 PAGE 4 38. Developer shall provide for gas service to all lots (units). 1 39. All utilities in the public right of way shall be completed prior to final street paving. BUILDING AND SAFETY REQUIREMENT'S: 40. A preliminary soils report, shall oe filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 41. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Office of Building and Safety as required by Uniform Building Code Chapter 70. 42. Submit plans and obtain building permits for walls required by other departments. 43. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official prior to any land disturbance. 44. Pay the following, fees at the time the building permit is issued - APARTMENTS: Street School Park 375/Unit 1678/Unit 275/Unit ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS SD Sewer Total 185/Unit 1500/Unit 4013/Unit I am the owner/representative of the property described above. I am aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth herein. It is further understood that all of the aforementioned conditions which require installation of improvements shall be comleted in a manner satisfactor to the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace and shall not be deemed completed until approved and accepted as said by Department. SIGNATURE OWNER/REPRESENTA.TIVE DATE DATE : FROM TO - REFERRAL %1E,%10 SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 825-7503 COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, CA 92324 i11 CFILE:N40:.12-8.5057 --, SITE PLAN ONLY �.� SUBJECT Application for Conditional Use Permit 6 Site S Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Map 13364, Specific Plan 86-40 Conditional Use Permit 86-7, Site & Architectural Review 8b-IU tor Terrace Urove a uni apartment pro-ject located at the NE corner of Canal Street and Barton Road. The above referenced application has been filed with the City Planning Director. Any planning comment you -nay have should be received in this office no later than SEPTEMBER 26, 1986 for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. VOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease- -ents across the property proposed for development. ------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the proposed: IT IS APPARENT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL IMPACT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATIVE TO STUDENT HOUSING. BUILDERS FEES ARE IN ORDER AND SHOULD BE COLLECTED. HOWEVER, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS GROWING IMMENSELY DUE TO THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THERE WILL BE A SHORTAGE OF CLASSROOMS AND WE HOPE THAT THE PLANNIPVG DEPT WILL TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT THE SCHOOL HOUSING SITUATION. NAXE DANNY CARRASCO, DIRECTOR OF ADMINXSTRATIVErERVIC rnrTnty TnTIVT rRVT.'IED SCHOOL DISTRICT 876-4109 Department (Please Identify Agency) Phone : ORESTRY AND FIRE WARIEN DEPARTMENT RUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Its Drotec-flan Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 85 No Arrowhead Avenue. First Floor • San Bernardino CA 92415-0186 FLOYD TIDWELL. Director 714) 387-4244 ,LEN J. NEWMAN, Chief f EMERGENCY SERVICES \'6 , , c " I _Ida DATE: September 25, 1986 REFERENCE #: 12-8.5057 TO: City of Grand Terrace Planning Tentative Attn: Joseph Kiack Plan 86-4, FROM: Glen J. Newman 86-7, Site County Fire Warden 86-10 LOCATION. SUBJECT: Fire Protection Requirements Checked Boxes Will Apply To This Protect KICAK & 41; +r`s TR Map 13364, Specific Conditional Use Permit & Architectural Review Terrace Grove Apts., northeast corner Canal St and Barton Rd. Grand Terrace Qx F1. The above referenced pro3ect is protected by the Forestry 3F001 and Fire Warden Department. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the fire department for ver.Lfication of current fire pro- tection development requirements. Qx F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections 5F002 of the 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No.3055), Development Code, Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fire and fire prevention adopted by the State or County. F3. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of 5F003 three (3) inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street. ® F4. Each chimney used in conjuction with any fireplace 5F004 or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. F5. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each 3F005 building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two 1F006 points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code. x� F7. Private roadways which exceed one -hundred and fifty 1F007 (150) feet in length shall be approved by the fire agency having ]urisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%). Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protec- tion system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. U F8. A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 1FO08 one -hundred fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six -hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Code. F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to 1F009 grading and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction. Qx F10. All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire 1F010 flow requirements specificed in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made service- able prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for as required by the water purveyor. Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water. The following are minimum requirements for -your proposed development: A. System Standards Fire Flow* 3500 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure Duration 3 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 330 Feet (Between Fire Hydrants) *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received. B. Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterals 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C. Fire Hydrants Numbers 6 Total Type 6 Inch w/ 2 - 2hInch outlet/s w/ National Standard thread b w/ 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate • • © F.l. The required fire flow shall be determined by appro- 1F011 priate calculations, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow." C F12. In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire 3FO12 protection water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting." A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. F13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire 1FO13 department with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. In addition, a letter from the water purveyor stating what fire flow can be met shall be required. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. F14. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified 3FO14 in San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced. F15. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be 1FO15 required. Requirements will be site specific to the project. The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdic- tion prior to recordation of the final map. Mainten- ance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department. - Questions and/or comments may be directed to Fire Protection Planning Services at 385 North Arrowhead, 1st floor, San Bernardino, California, 92415-0186, (714) 387-4244 or Fxre---Protection Planning- Services--at--15505- Civic- Drive, Victorville, California 92392-, (6191 243-8100: Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GLEN J. NEWMAN County Fire Warden by: Frank Kawasaki._,: Asst. Fire Protection Planning Officer c: Bryde-Mossman Architects/Planners The following are x Non -Standard Conditions Clarifications Comments: F16. Fire Extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standard #10-1. F17. All roadways shall be a minimum 20' unobstructed width, with posted "No Parking" signs. _ _ , i_ },., rr,o Fi rP DPoartment and REFERRAL MEMO PILE NZ O. 12-8.5057 DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 i2CENED AT FROM: City of Grand Terrace Planning Department & AS%C►ATES Attn: Joseph Kicak 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 825-7503 TO: PACIFIC TELEPHONE CO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ONLY 3939 E. Coronado Street, 2nd Floor Anaheim, CA 92807 SUBJECT Application for Conditional Use Permit Site S Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Map 13364, Specific Plan 86-4, Conditional Use Permit 86-7, Site & Architectural Review 8 for Terrace Grove a 95 un. apartment project located at the NE corner of Canal Street and Barton Road. The above referenced application has been filed with the City 2lanning Director. any planning comment you may have should be received in this office no later than SEPTEMBER 26, 1986 for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. VOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFOMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease- -ants across the property proposed for development. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the proposed: cd- Department (Please Identify Agency) Phone STATE Of CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Govn+w DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT / ► O box 231 SAN BERNARDINO CAUPORNIA 924M Development Review 11710 �- - Planning Department City of Grand Terrace 22365 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 197-1fn Y1,04 Jose,- 0/i Xiea k -S-as- 7 (Reference) (%r/-acer Grooe 4ECE»Fp 4T ,-too S Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed 96 0nilr The following items marked by an "X" apply to this proposal: X This proposal is considerably removed from an existing or proposed state highway. Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates them. X We have no specific comment on this proposal. If additional information is desired, (714) 383-4671. d-01% R. G. POTS' District Permit Engineer please call Mr. Will Brisley at Form 8-PD23 (Rev. 1-86) _e REFERRAL %1EA10 DATE ; SEPTE.MBER 11, 1986 FROM City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 825-7503 TO: SOUTFIEERN CALIF. GAS CO. P O. BOX 6226, San Bernardu►o, CA 92417 FILE Nb . 12-8.5057 3ECz.;dEO AT i' _ . 1986 K CAK & 4SSflCtATES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ONLY. SUBJECT Application for Conditional Use Permit E Site E Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Map 13364, Specific Plan 86-4, Conditional Use Permit 86-7, Site & Architectural Review 86-10 for Terrace Grove a 96 unit apartment pro]ect located at the NE corner of Canal Street and Barton Road. The above referenced application has been filed with the City Planning Director. Any planning comment you may have should be received in this office no later than SEPTEMBER 26, 1986 for Planning Review. --Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this protect should not go forward, or wish to know ghat decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. NOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease - Tents across the property proposed for development. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the propas o F -Tlv�. o h i 1v oc#c W w. auf Put ".+ wLX, 791--7-7 11 , , � .��,,. a�� - K . ► fib 6 � � b4hda~,e� -"sO \_�iI IW.. %1-0 %9A- Department (PL ase Identify Agency) Phone i • 42'P. sa 5-7 'Aw OrrILEs Or NAZAREK. HARPER HOPKINS & MCFARLIN A •aiimcasm P %. . a , PAoress a4A% u.a.oAAT Otis EUGENE A NA2 •REP%' JOMN R HARPER' IVAN L .0PwINs GEORGIr w wCFARLIN JOIN P BARRON • P40r[SS10r.AL \aapOaAT,oN Ricnard Britton 14 Pauma Lane Newport Beach, CA 92660 34a WEST m+)SPIiALITT LANE SI,ITE 102 SAN BERNARDINO CALIF08AIA 0240tl 17141 924 83E0 October 2, 1986 Re: City of Grand Terrace AP Zone Dear Mr. Britton: 2303 MARTIN STREET SUITE 225 IRVIN[ CALIFORNIA 9271s 7141 752 8494 During our telephone conversation of Wednesday, October you requested that I inform you in writing of the permitted the AP Zone of the City of Grand Terrace and whether or not housing projects are permitted. 1, 1986, uses in mult%family- The Administrative and Professional Office District (AP) provides for R-3 (multifamily residential) uses as provided for in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Section 18.21.020 (GT Municipal Code Section 18.30.030 G). Section 18.21.020 provides that "uses permitted in the R-3 district shall be as follows: Multifamily uses, apartments, duplexes, triplexes, fourplex, group dwellings, public uses, including parks and playgrounds." In order to develop your property as multifamily, it will be necessary to prepare and have approved a specific plan relative to your planned development. In addition, your project would require a con- ditional use permit, as well as all other routine permits and approvals. In the past, the Planning Commission has required that applicants for multifamily projects in the AP Zone submit an application for a zone change as part of the approval process. :a • ` LAW OFFICES C 0 i YAZRREK. HARPER. HOPKINS & .1-icFARLIN • PAATMces" 0 tiCWOlwO 040F[SS10ft" -3Qo0Q'%T10ni If we can be of any additional assistance, pl to contact me. Veer truly, Ivan L. Hopkins City Attorney ILH:dms cc: Joe Kicak & Associates Bill Mauerhan t hesitate RESOLUTION NO. PC 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT 13364 AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 86-4 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4 has been prepared and submitted for approval as required by the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Environmental Review - That with respect to an environmental review of Tentative Tract 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4, an environmental review has been conducted and noticed pursuant to Section 21092 of the Public Resources Code, that based upon the review, including the mitigation measures, the City of Grand Terrace Environmental Review Officer found the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 2. Mitigation Measures - That this Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Mitigation Measures and finds and determines that said Plan as conditioned by said Mitigation Measures will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. Public Hearing - That a public hearing has been noticed, held, and conducted in the time, form, and manner pursuant to Government Code 65500. SECTION 4. Approval of Tentative Tract Map and Specific Plan - That this Planning Commission having reviewed the findings of the Environmental Review Officer and the testimony given does hereby recommend the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace approve the Tentative Tract Map 13364 and Specific Plan 86-4, subject to the mitigation measures, make the findings, adopt the Negative Declaration, and instruct the City Clerk to issue a Notice of Determination. ADOPTED ATTEST: CITY CLERK Approved as to form: CITY.ATTORNEY CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION �L 1 C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO SUBJECT 4 *TA FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX n DATE Nov. 13, 198 E T COUNCIL ITEM ( }MEETING DATE Nov 20, 1986 GROUP W CABLE RATE CHANGE Pr Michael D. McDonald, General Manager for Group W Cable will be attending the Grand Terrace City Council meeting on November 20, 1986 for the purpose of discussing rate changes which will be effective in Grand Terrace on January 1, 1987. A letter was sent out to the Grand Terrace subscribers on October 27, 1986 which outlines the monthly charges for the various services, what the increases will be and the one-time installation charge. I have asked Mr.McDonald to also point out the rates of other television organizations servicing ad3oining cities so that we have comparisons with the Group W rates for service in Grand Terrace. Group W Cable has not raised their rates in the four and a half years they have been in Grand Terrace. Mr. McDonald has assured the City that subscribers will continue to receive quality service at a fair and reasonable rate SA.bt GROUP W CABLE GROUP W Cable Inc P O BOX 2445 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92406 (714) 881-2511 Dear Subscriber, Effective January 1, 1987, Group W's rates for service in Grand Terrace will be changing. It has been over 4 1/2 years that we have served the City of Grand Terrace without a rate increase. To operate as a successful business we must offset increased operating expenses through rate adjustments. While some services are increasing, others will actually decrease. On the reverse side is a table summarizing these changes. We are also instituting a new concept for additional sets with premium services. As of January 1st, we will be offering for a $7.00/month flat rate an exact mirror of the premium services on your first set. Thus, no matter whether you have 1 premium service or 5 premium services on your first set, the charge for additional sets will be only $7.00/month. A new charge is being instituted to cover the costs incurred for changing existing services. This fee, called a change of service charge, is designed to cover our cost of processing both equipment and paperwork. However, due to the new rate changes, we will waive this fee during the month of January only. I believe you will find our new rates to rates. We look forward to providing you, service. Sincerely, V0- ?iw00 Michael D. McDonald General Manager Group W Cable of Grand Terrace be reasonable and consistent with area our subscriber, with continuing quality FILE COPY (over) if I RATE CARD (Effective 1/1/87) Service Existing Rate New Rate Change Monthly Charges Basic Service $ 6.95 $10.95 + $4.00 Basic + 1 premium channel 16.90 20.90 + 4.00 Basic + 2 premium channels 26.35 30.85 + 4.50 Basic + 3 premium channels 35.80 40.80 + 5.00 Basic + 4 premium channels 45.25 50.75 + 5.50 Basic + 5 premium channels 54.70 60.70 + 6.00 Basic additional outlet 2.95 4.00 + 1.05 Basic + 1 premiun additional outlet 5.90 7.00 + 1.10 Basic + 2 premium additional outlets 8.85 7.00 - 1.85 Basic + 3 premium additional outlets 11.80 7.00 - 4.80 Basic + 4 premium additional outlets 14.75 7.00 - 7.75 Basic + 5 premium additional outlets 17.70 7.00 - 10.70 Remote Control 3.00 4.50 + 1.50 FM Service 1.95 3.00 + 1.05 One Time Charges Installation charge 29.95 34.95 + 5.00 Change of Service (Effective 2/1/87) 14.95 19.95 + 5.00 STAFF REPORT Date 11/18/86 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: 11/20/86 AGENDA ITEM NO. Add -on 12-B (1) & (2) SUBJECT: Resolutions Calling a Special Runoff Election & Requesting Services from the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters. FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED Pursuant to Resolution No. 82-14, a Special Runoff Election must be called to resolve the November 4 Election tie vote for Tony Petta and Barbara Pfennighausen. The Election must be held on a Tuesday no sooner than 40 days or later than 125 days from the Certification of the November 4 Election (November 17). The earliest feasible date for conducting this Special Runoff Election is January 13, 1987, and the latest legal date is March 17, 1987 Inasmuch as the interim period leaves the City with a four -member Council, Staff recommends calling the Election for Tuesday, January 13, 1987, or soon after. Appropriation request for the Election will be put before Council at a future meeting when the estimated amount has been determined. Staff Recommend Council i DETERMINE DATE AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTIONS CALLING THE SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION AND REQUESTING SERVICES FROM THE COUNTY. ID Enclosures rJ' P- ^ "J'TY CC}VN C" -?? OVAL RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO RENDER SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, , 1987. WHEREAS, A Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Grand Terrace, California, on Tuesday, , 1987, and 5 WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of said election and relation thereto, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace desires to receive services of the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 22003 of the Elections Code of the State of California, this City Council hereby requests the Board of Supervisors of said County to permit the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Section 2 That said City shall reimburse said County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill. Section 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward without delay to said Board of Supervisors and to said Registrar of Voters each a certified copy of this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of , 198 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof N STArF REPOR i Dat-ec11/18/86 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: 11/20/86 AGENDA ITEM NO. Add -on 12-B (3) SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Special Runoff Election FUNDING IS REQUIRED FUNDING MAY BE REQUIRED XX The attached Resolution deals with the Candidate Statements. Please note that there are two alternatives for Section 3 dealing with "Payment." Alternate #1 has been the po iciy for previous elections. Inasmuch as this is a Special Runoff Election, Council may wish to consider that cost be assumed by the City. Staff Recommend Council (1) ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION SELECTING EITHER ALTERNATIVE SECTION 3 #1 or #2, (2) IF SECTION 3 ALTERNATIVE #1 IS SELECTED, AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO CHARGE CANDIDATES AN ESTIMATED $175 00 FOR (AST OF PRINTING ID Enclosure FA PENDING CiTy RESOLUTION NO. 86- COUNCIL APPROVAL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, , 1987. WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by the candidate for a Special Runoff Election, including costs of the candidates statement, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of Grand Terrace on Tuesday, , 1987, may prepare a candidate statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than two -hundred (200) words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk by 5 00 p.m., three days following the governing body's declaration of the results from the November 4, 1986, Election. Section 2. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. Section 3 - (Alternative #1) PAYMENT. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. The City Clerk shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit or shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of the deposit. Section 3 - (Alternative #2) PAYMENT. Inasmuch as this is a_Special Runoff Election, cost of the two statements shall be assumed by the City. Section 4 That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution. Section 5. That all previous Resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidates statements are repealed. Section 6. That this Resolution shall apply only to the Special Runoff Election to be held on Tuesday, 1987, and shall then be repealed. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. Adopted this 12th day of June, 1986. ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of GrandTerrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. I, Ilene Dughman, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1987, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form City Attorney -2- City Clerk toTA ' REeUkT Date 11/18/86 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: November 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM NO. Add -on SUBJECT: Resolution No. 82-14 Re Tie Votes FUNDING IS REQUIRED NO FUNDING IS REQUIRED XX Section 20501 of the Elections Code of the State of California (copy attached) provides that the Election Board (in our case, the City Council) shall resolve a tie vote by lot. In lieu of that method, paragraph (b) states a special runoff election shall be called for such determination if that provision is adopted by Council prior to an election resulting in a tie vote. In 1982 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 82-14 to resolve election tie votes by special runoff elections. This Resolution applies to all future elections unless repealed. Therefore, unless that Resolution is rescinded, Council would be compelled to call another runoff election should another tie occur in the special runoff to resolve the November 4 election. Although this is very remote, it is possible. Council may wish to rescind Resolution No. 82-14 prior to conducting this special runoff election to allow for determining the winner by lot in event of a tie. The proposed resolution would rescind Resolution No. 82-14 and provide that consideration for adopting a resolution to require a special runoff election to resolve a tie vote would be placed before Council prior to all future election. Staff Recommends Council CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 82-14 AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS V� Chapter 4. Tie Votes ELECTIONS CODE 1986 Article 1. Elettions other Than prunary Elections 29500. -1pplication of article. This article does aot apply to any primary election. (Added by StaLs. 1961, c. 23, p0500.) 20501. Determination of a tie vote; special runoff election. (a) If at any election, except as provided in subdivision (b) and an election for Governor or Lieutenant Governor, two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office to be voted for in more than one county, the Secretary of State shall forthwith summon the candidates who have received the tie votes, whether upon the canvass of the returns by the Secretary of State or upon recount by a court, to appear before him or her at the Secretary of State's office at the State Capitol at a time to be designated by him or her The Secretary of State shall at that time and place determine the tie by lot. Except as provided in subdivision (b), in the same manner, at a time and place designated by it, the election board shall determine a tie vote, whether upon the canvass of the returns by the election board or upon a recount by a court, for candidates voted for wholly within one county or city (b) In lieu of resolving a tie vote by lot as provided in subdivision (a), the legislative body of any county, city, or special district may resolve a tie vote by the conduct of a special runoff election involving those candidates who received an equal number of votes and the highest number of votes A special runoff election shall be held only if the legislative body adopts the provisions of this subdivision prior to the conduct of the election resulting in the tie vote If a legislative body decides to call a special runoff election in the event of a tie vote, all future elections conducted by that body shall be resolved by the conduct of a special runoff election, unless the legislative body later repeals the authority for the conduct of a special runoff election If a special runoff election is held pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision, the legislative body shall call for the runoff election to be held in the local entity on a Tuesday not less than 40 nor more than 125 days after the administrative or judicial certification of the election which resulted in a tie vote If a regular election is to be held throughout the jurisdiction within such time period, the special runoff election shall be held on the same day as, and consolidated with, - -' the regular election (Amended by Stats 1980, c 564, �1) SE RESOLUTION NO. 86- PENDING CITY COUNCIL riPPROVAL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 82-14 PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF A TIE VOTE AT ANY MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND ►BAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS. WHEREAS, Section 20501(b) of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the City Council, by ma0ority vote, to adopt provisions to require the conduct of a special runoff election to resolve a tie vote involving those candidates who received an equal number of votes and the highest number of votes for an elective office; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has determined that such provision should be decided prior to each Municipal Election, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1. Recission - that Resolution No. 82-14 is hereby rescinded in its entirety. Section 2. That the City Council shall consider adoption of provision to resolve, by special runoff election, a tie vote involving those candidates who receive an equal number of votes and the highest number of votes for an elective office. That such provision shall apply only to that specific election and then shall be repealed. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions. ADOPTED this day of 1986. ATTEST City Clerk of the City of rand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. Approved as to form Ci ty Attorney f n RESOLUTION NO 86- PENDiNG CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, , 1987, FOR THE ELECTION OF A COUNCIL MEMBER AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF LAW. WHEREAS, an election was held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, for the purpose of electing two Members of the City Council for the full term of four years, and WHEREAS, a tie vote occurred between candidates Tony Petta and Barbara Pfennighausen, and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 82-14 adopted on February 25, 1982, directed that tie votes be resolved at a special runoff electfon, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 20501b of the Elections Code of the State of California and pursuant to Resolution No. 82-14, adopted on February 25, 1982, there is called and ordered to be held in the City on Tuesday, , 1987, a Special Runoff Election for the purpose of electing one Member of the City Council for the full term of four years. Section 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be, in form and content, as required by law to be used in the election. Section 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election Section 4 That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the same day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. Section 6 That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 7 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions ADOPTED this day of , 1986