The URL can be used to link to this page

08/27/1987CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A F CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR MEETINGS 2nd and 4th Thursdays - 5:30 p.m. August 27, 1987 Counci 1 Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 City Councilmembers Byron R. Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Crawford, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager Ivan L. Hopkins, City Attorney Nita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Joseph Kicak, City Engineer Randall L. Anstine, Assistant City Manager David R. Sawyer, Planning Director City Office: 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of Minutes 7/30/87 2. Approval of Check Register No. 13 87 CRA0887 ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY C011 GENE CITY COUNCIL Aaw 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Accept award from Southern California Joint Powers Insurance Authority for the best loss record for fiscal year 1986/87. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register (1) 081387 (2) 082787 B. Ratify 8/27/87 CRA Action Staff Recommendations Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve August 27, 1987 5:30 P.M. Council Action Staff COUNCIL AGENDA Recommendations 8/27/87 - Page 2 of 3 C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances and Approve Resolutions on Agenda D. Approve 7/30/87 Minutes Approve E. Approve Council/Staff attendance at Approve the League of California Cities Annual Conference, October 4-7, 1987 in San Francisco. F. Appoint City Manager as City Clerk Approve G. Reject Claim from Gary Lawson in the in development fees paid amount of $3,000 to the City. H. Accept Grant Deeds from Forest City Accept Dillon. 14. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Emergency Operations Committee (a) Consider request to change meeting date to third Monday of the month. 2. Crime Prevention Committee (a) Consider request to change meeting date to second Monday of the month. 3. Parks & Recreation Committee (a) Accept resignation from Jason Otter. (b) Griffin Park Upgrading. (c) Parks & Rec. Household Survey. (d) General Plan Update. (e) Pico Park Site. (f) Tour de Terrace. Council Action COUNCIL AGENDA 8/27/87 - Page 3 of 3 4. Historical & Cultural Committee B. Council Reports 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 107. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Requesting reduction of fees for a change in the zoning ordinance regarding allowable signs for Quiel Brothers signs (Orco Tool) . B. Request from Dr. Wagoner for reduction in fees regarding Conditional Use Permit for installation of a HAM radio antenna. C. Appoint Council Members to serve as members and alternate to serve on the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Advisory Committee. D. Council approval to bring recreation program in-house. E. CLOSED SESSION - POTENTIAL LITIGATION ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILT_ BE HELD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1987, AT 5:30 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 09/10/87 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12:00 NOON ON 09/10/87. Oq Staff Recommendations Council Action CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PEWNG CRA APP'#1` NAL AUG � 7 1987 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - JULY 30, 1987 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on July 30, 1987, at 5:35 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Vice Chairman Dennis L. Evans, Agency Member Susan Crawford, Agency Member Hugh J. Grant, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney David Sawyer, Planning Director ABSENT: Joe Kicak, City Engineer APPROVAL OF JULY 09, 1987 MINUTES CRA-87-31 Motion by Vice Chairman Pfennighausen, second by Mr. Evans, ALL AYES, to approve the minutes of July 09, 1987. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA072387 CRA-87-32 Motion by Vice Chairman Pfennighausen, second by Mr. Evans, to approve Check Register No. CRA072387. APPROVE & AUTHORIZE ENTERING INTO AN INTER -AGENCY LOAN AGREEMENT FORMALIZING LOANS BETWEEN THE AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL CRA-87-33 Motion by Chairman Matteson, second by Vice Chairman Pfennighausen. Mr. Evans asked if the sum of $2,222,000.63 is currently what the CRA owes the City. The City Manager replied that wascorrect and that includes the current year obligation. Mr. Evans questioned through June 1988? The City Manager replied that is correct. Mr. Evans stated he was curious as to why the Auditors suggested that we do this. The City Manager stated it was the Auditors' feeling, since the Redevelopment Agency and the City are legally distinct and separate entities that, in order for the City to loan a sum of money to the Agency, it would be proper to record that as an agreement so the City would have a formal document that shows the Agency has a debt to the City and it would set forth the terms of that debt. The CRA AGENDA ITEM No. City Manager stated that, based on the Auditors' recommendation, staff is recommending that we adopt formalization of the loan policy. Motion CRA-87-33 carried, ALL AYES, to approve and authorize entering into an Inter -Agency Loan Agreement formalizing loans between the Agency and City Council. APPOINT A MEMBER TO BE DESIGNATED AS THE DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY TO LA VERNE-GRAND TERRACE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY CRA-87-34 Motion by Vice Chairman Pfennighausen, second by Mr. Grant, ALL AYES, that the Mayor be appointed to this particular board. Recessed CRA at 5:37 p.m. Recovened CRA at 6:11 p.m. Westar Associates Mr. Brizius stated he would like to bring Council up-to-date on Bob Brizius Westar's progress with developing the shopping center that 2925 Bristol Westar proposed to the Agency several months ago at Michigan Costa Mesa and Barton Road and referenced a letter he had presented to the City Manager requesting an extension on their exclusive right to negotiate. He stated Westar had sent out approximately 4,000 surveys to homeowners and had approximately 1,000 responses. He stated any survey that gets 5 or 6 percent shows the citizens of the city care. He stated the basic issue was the traffic direction which people come home toward Grand Terrace and find out whether they cross Barton Road first or cross down at Washington where the Albertson Store is going. He stated the other information is they preferred that side versus the side that they were working on. He stated that the direction the people were returning was about 50/50 coming from the 10 freeway crossing Washington first or coming from the 91 and the 60 crossing Barton Road. He stated there was a 60/40 split in the majority of people who preferred the Barton Road location due to the congestion and, with those statistics in mind, they did a full demographic study and went out to the tenants which include primarily markets and drugstores. In order for this center to be successful, it needs both a market and drugstore, but primarily a grocery story because they lead the way. He stated they have only had one negative response to relocate there which is Albertson's, as they are already set in place. Mr. Brizius further stated not all of the markets had been out to study the location. He stated that Lucky's would be the most likely, as they were going to be the tenant where Albertson's is now. Mr. Brizius stated that they received a letter from Thrifty and OSCO and they will be out with their Board from Chicago to look at the site the first part of August. He stated that he has requested from the City Manager an extension to keep working with the markets to see how they ferret out. He stated that Westar still feels very high being CRA Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 2 in this City for convenience versus where Albertson's is going. He stated that they feel there are enough demographics at this point of time to support both, but the majority of the population is up here. He stated they feel the rest of the population as you go out Reche Canyon and on out into parts of Loma Linda are taking the Barton Road cutoff. He stated that the majority of people that responded to the questionnaire favored the location, but they did have some traffic concerns. Mr. Brizius stated that everyone within the project area had been contacted, he was open for any suggestions and again requested an extension to keep working on the site. He stated the majority of people are willing sellers, and it comes down to how much they can pay and how much they want to receive. Mr. Brizius asked if there were any questions. Councilman Grant stated that he was impressed with Mr. Brizius' optimism of not throwing in the towel, therefore he didn't think the council should. He stated that Council should encourage Westar to continue to work on the project and right to negotiate. CRA-87-35 Motion by Councilman Grant, second by Councilman Evans, to follow staff's recommendation in the Staff Report dated July 21, 1987. The City Attorney stated that the Mayor had a potential conflict of interest in this matter and that he should again publicly state so. The Mayor stated that he would not vote on this matter as he owns property in the area. Councilman Evans questioned if they were to successfully put in a center along Barton Road before development at the base of the hill, would that garner the market for and cause problems for the developers? Mr. Brizius stated that he could not speak for Albertson's or Payless Drugs, but Sprouse Reitz is relocating down there. He stated it really comes down to the battle that he is fighting uphill whether there is enough trade there to split between the two markets. He stated it is a big risk; you don't have amarket until its doors are open. Mr. Brizius stated that he knew of two Safeway stores down in San Diego that actually built the stores and never opened the doors. He didn't think Alberton's would get that far along. He stated that they have access problems and he was informed by Jennifer Thornberry, who is the head of Colton's redevelopment agency, that they have some soil problems. They also need to work some problems out with Caltrans because it is a Caltrans freeway exit that the agency down there at Colton is going to reconfigure. He stated at this point he presumed that they will build. Mr. Brizius CRA Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 3 agreed with Councilman Evans -that it is not the right location; that they had looked at that location a year ago when they first came to Colton and were unable to do anything there. He stated that he couldn't fathom anyone putting a center there, but someone else sees it differently. Mr. Brizius stated he understands that the land has been purchased by the developer and they are working through the City. He stated that they have been working with Jennifer Thornberry. He stated, in reference to the permits, he believed they had been in for preliminary plot plan approvals. He stated that Arnold -Pacific was the developer, and they are doing a center in Corona, at Lincoln, with Lucky's and Payless; that they are a very capable developer. Councilman Evans asked Mr. Brizius if anything could be done by the Council or citizens to help other than to grant his request. Mr. Brizius replied to write a letter; that Lucky's is the most likely candidate. He stated that Westar has many centers with Vons, but Vons is building a new pavilion store that is 55,000 square feet, which this population could not support; Vons always locate their stores in a densely -populated location. He stated that he understood that Ralph's just obtained a lease to build a store near the Riverside Raceway in Moreno Valley and is still looking in the Inland Empire area. Mr. Brizius stated that Westar has not approached Stater Bros. regarding a relocation to a larger store. 'He stated that their direction was to try and bring in competition. He stated that if Ralph's were to come to the Inland Empire, they will build four or five stores so they can economically service them. Motion CRA-87-35 carried 4 AYES, with one abstention by Mayor Matteson, to follow staff's recommendation in the Staff Report dated July 21, 1987. CRA Meeting adjourned at 6:26 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held Respectfully submitted, ecretary APPROVED: Chairman CRA Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 4 AUG 2 7 1987 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PENDING CRA APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AUG. 13, 1987 CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA081387 CHECK NUMBER OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUG. 13, 1987 (1) P5178 RECO REFRIGERATION (2) P5201 SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (3) 17304 RECO REFRIGERATION (4) 17310 SANWA BANK CALIFORNIA PROGRESS PAYMENT #3 FOR AIR CONDITIONING AT TERRACE HILLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PASS -THROUGH OF INCREMENTAL TAX FOR F/Y 1986/1987 FROM REVISED GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AS PER AGREEMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT #4 FOR AIR CONDITIONING AT TERRACE HILLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEASE PAYMENT ON CIVIC CENTER TOTAL $ 53,682.00 23,137.57 60,392.40 152,913.05 $290,125.02 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORLISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER 4) 1 CRA AGE-ND4 ITUA NO- COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AUG. 27, 1987 AUG 2 7 1987 PeNDiNG CRA APf�-OVAL; CHECK REGISTER NO.CRA082787 CHECK NUMBER OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF AUG. 27. 1987 (1) 17338 SUSAN CRAWFORD STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1987 (2) 17339 DENNIS EVANS STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1987 (3) 17342 HUGH GRANT STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1987 (4) 17349 BYRON MATTESON - STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1987 (5) 17355 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN STIPENDS FOR AUGUST, 1987 TOTAL $150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 $750.00 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER CRA AGENDA ITEM NO, VOUCHFEG GATE 09/07/F7 VOUCHE -/ CHFCK NUt"IF R P5170 P5177 P5179 P5179 P5180 P5181 P5182 P5183 P5184 P5185 VE^'DOR n0MBFR 6720 6730 6144 6970 4634 6720 6730 6720 --6730 4347 VENCLR NAME SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY SO.CA.GAS COMPANY kECO kEFKIGEkATION EQUIP LORETTA THOMPSON MAIN LINE EMBOSSING SO.CA.EDISOK) COMPANY SO.CA.GAS COMPANY SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY S0.CA.G45 COMPANY LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CIT P5186 MCCUTCHEN,DOYLE,BROWN LE P5187 S.B.000NTY FAIR P5188 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY P5189 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY P5190 2260 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 0 P5191 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY -P5192-SO:CA:GAS-COMPANY- P5193 6970 LORETTA THOMPSON P5194 6970 LORETTA THOMPSON P5195 BDA/IE P5196 6720 SO.CA.EOISON COMPANY P 5 1 Q 7 6 7 � 0 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY P5198 6720 SO.CA.EDISCN COMPANY P5199 6 73 0 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CITY OF GRAND TEPRACE VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTEP FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM 0F5CRII,TIHN CASH PAYT.1/20,SCE CASH PAYT.7/209SCG .CO. PROGRESS PAY.A/C,HIGH SCHOOL COMPUTER SOFTWARE BISNESS CARD/COTTRELL23.32 BUSINESS CAkD/LAKE CASH PAYT.7/219SCE CASH PA- YT.7121,SCG CASH PAYT.7/22,SCE CASFF-PAYT.7/22,SCG - IES LCC CONF.ARROWHEAO LCC CONF.ARROWHEAD NERSEN SEMINAR/LAND USE MEETING/MATTESON CASH PAYT.7/23,SCE CASH PAYT.7/23,SCG EPT. S.U.I.SECOND QUARTER,87 S.U.I.SECOND QUARTER,87 CASH PAYT.7/277SCE -- -CASH--PAYT.7727,-SCG - PAYROLL,THOMPSON TERMINATION PAY/THOMPSON -SEM/PFENNIGHAUSEN CASH PAYT.7/28,SCE CASH PAYT.7/28,SCG CASH PAYT.7/29,SCE CASH PAYT.7/29,SCG AUG �-t i981 PEPID►NG CITY .11 CHECK REGISTER NO. 081387 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 426.98 42b.98 309.39 309.39 53,682.00 53,662.0-0 95.35 95.35 23.32 23.32 46.64 106.47 106.47 - 37.31 37.31 8.59 8.59 --4-.72 -- -- - y;7Z-- - --- 2,375.00 475.00 2,-8-5T.00 85.00 85.00 10.00 10.00 99.19 99.19 17.01 17.01 524.8 4 41.93 566.77 47.00 47.00 9 -- - - --- --- -- - -81 .7 9 592.00 592.00 3,495.47 3,495.47 10.00 - 10:00 -- 81.38 81.38 17.96 17.96 19.50 19.50 8.95 8.95 li f,QW, IL AGENDA ITEM : 3Acl) VOUCIIPFG CITY OF GRAND TERPACF DATE Or/ n7/V7 VOUCHEk/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PEkIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDUR ITLP• ITEM CHECK CHFCK NUMBER NUP'8Ek NA,`1E DESCRIPTION AMOUNT A110UNT P5200 6782 STATE COMPENSATION INS.FUND WORKERS COMP .INS .7/87 737.07 737.07 P5201 6560 SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY PASS—THROUGH,F/Y 86/87 23,137.57 239137.57 P5202 2605 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CA SCAG BOND ISSUE PAYMENT 6,843.01 SCAG-BOND--ISSUE PAYMENT 3,240.00 SCAG BOND ISSUE PAYMENT 6,843.01 161926.02 P5203 4110 KICAK E ASSOCIATES- ENG.-SVCS 7/1-7/26/87 25.25 ENG.SVCS 7/1-7/26/87 866.70 ENG.SVCS 7/1-7/26/87 703.00 - - ------------------ENG—SV-C-S- 77r_-T%Z '6_1_8 7--- - --- - --- - - - - — -7 7 6 . 6 0 — -- --- -� ENG.SVCS 7/1-7/26/87 2,555.60 ENG.SVCS 7/1-7/26/87 79608.05 129535.20 y P5204 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.7/31,SCE 79.79 79.79 P 5 2 0 5 _. 6 73 0--- --SO—C7�G A S COMP A N Y— --- — -- —C_A S H—P A Y T-: 7 /31 S-C G--- --- -- 4 -- -- - -- -- - --TD TA-C—CFf EC K S- - ---- _--- -- - -- -- --- ----------I-7 6 � I . �T — - 3: s<, f VDUCHP.EG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATF 08/11/87 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHFR VENI) Iip VENUUk ITEM T T F M CHECK ( I;FC,K %iIf !,F P "nlMfif P N A N I DESCR IPTIIIN AMOUNT AMULINT P2509 (,7 iO SO.CA.(,A'r (.(TMPANY CASH PAYT.8/5,SCG 64.11 6,1. 11 P2510 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/79SCE 31.05 31.05 P 2 5 1 1 E•730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/7,SCG 47.19 47.19 P5206 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/39SCE 242.59 242.59 P5207 6730 --SO.CA-.-GAS COMPANY '- - - CASH--P-AYT.8/-3TSCG - - - -51.02 ----- 51�0-2 P5208 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/59SCE 187.72 187.72 - P5212 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY • CASH PAYT.8/10,SCE 81.04 81.04 -P5213-- 6730----S-O:C-A7-GA-!�-COMPA-N1 --------CASH-PAYT-8/YOCG------- ----------- - - - --- 1-37 --- - 1-37 -- 17263 RICK ROSE REFUND,OVERPAY,PERMIT 34.00 34.00 >, 17264 HAROLD FRASER W.W.D."REFUND,FRASER 5.81 5.81 z )) - - --172 6-5-- -- ---------R-0-B E-R-T N EW M-A N --'-- `' --W . W . D . R E-FV ND i h E WM-A N--- - : O- 7.0-0 ' u: �1 17266 1005 AA EQUIPMENT HIGH PRESSURE WASHER 2,062.68 2,062.68 r 17267 1024 ACCENT PRINT E' DES-IGN ., - FL`eYE'RS/GOUN.TRY' FAIR 116.60 116.60 i) -- 17268 - - 1134--'---ALt-PR0- - C0NST-RUC-T-I-ON IK-I'NGST-Ohf---- -REPAIRSi -- --- 2-,-7-50-:00------- --------- REPAIRS,KINGSTON 3,340.00 61120.00 �) - -17269 --1-Y70 ANY -HOUR LOGI�E SAFE----- ffEYS3C-iV-iE-EEFFER 6-7:00 6-7.00 17270 1223 ATET INFORMATION SYSTEMS RENT FHONE,EOC 4.35 4.35 17271 1360 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER,8/5,C/C 28.50 RENT WATER COOLER,8/87,C/C 42.00 - --------- - ----------6QTfLED-W-ATEk�7/2��C/C- -- - --- -Z-3-.75 ---9-4.-25-- - 17272 1656 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS CMBTA,MEMB,87/88 30.00 30.00 17273 1711 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF BART/215 LIGHTS 173.77 173.77 17274 1-740- CITY CLERK'S--ASSN OF CALIF-- - CC -AC- MEMB-.�87/88------ _ 20.00 - - -20-.00 17275 1748 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEAN R/R,PARK (4 DAYS) 80.00 CLEAN R/R-,PARK(4 DAYS) 80.00 160.00 17276 1150 C H J MATEkIALS LAPORATORY SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS,V/G W 11800.00 11800.00 17277 18h0 COLTON, CITY OF W.W.D.SVCS.8/87 19,735.29 191735.29 17271, 191? 3D COMPUTER SUPPLY PRINTER--'RIBBONS9W/P 52.95 li v Vf)UCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE 08/11/P7 VOUCHER/CHECK PEGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS V'OUCHFF/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK NUN(iFr' NU,"HE R N A M F DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AP'OUNT PRINTER RISBONS,W/P 10.59 63.54 17279 2042 DICKSON CO.OF INLAND EMPIRE STREET SWEEP.7/87 1,920.64 19920.64 17280 22&5 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 82.82 82.82 17281 2689 J. R. FREEMAN CO.,INC. RENT TYPEWRITER,PLANNING 63.60 63.60 17282 2867 G.T.MAILERS MAIL PICK=UP,6/87 Z5.00 -� MAIL PICK-UP97/87 25.00 50.00 -17283 - - -3217-- -----I VAN-HOPK,I-NS - - - - - - -- --LEGAL--5ERV-ICES,7/87 - -- -- 29973-39------- -- 2i973�39------ 17284 3218 HYDREX PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL,7/879C/C 48.00 48.00 1 17285 3224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS,INC. IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 76.95 76.95 17286- - - 4470 -----LOMA-L-I-ND-A--D-ISPOS-At -----------------TRASH-PI-CK-UP-t8/87iC/C - - - 38�35------ - ,2 TRASH PICK-UP98/87,PARK 38.35 76.70 1-7Z87 --- 4473--.-- -- L'OMA-LINDA-MAGAZINE-----------------SUB:C.-L.MAGAZINE -'- - -- ---.- 18.0-0-- - - -----18-O(1- --- 17288 4640 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SVCS. TEMPSVCS.PLANNING 673.92 - - - ----- -- ---------- -- ---- -------- - ------------- --TEMP : S V C�PL A N MI N G--- - - --- - ---- --3 7 4-. 4 0 - -- -----Yr0-4 8-.-3 2- 17289 4657 M KENZIE COMPANY PARTS/OLYMPIA 22.13 22.13 4 17290 4715 MORELAND E ASSOCIATES,INC. PROGRESS PAY.AUDIT,86/87 2,538.40 PROGRESS PAY.AUDIT,86/87 253.10 - - -- ----- ----- ----------- - ----- ---- - ---- --A'UD-I-T-iCR-IM-E-JUSTICE-GRANT--- --- ----- --- AUDIT 1986/87 3,640.00 6,889.50 172Q1- - ---4890 - JEAN MYERS-- - ---- -- -CRASS-GUIrRD;7Y13=7/24/g7------- -- -- - -84.80 - ---- -- ---- -- -- a CROSS.GUARD 7/27-7/31/87 42.40 127.20 17292- --5450------OTI-S-ELEV-A-TOR --- COMPANY - M-AihtT/-EL--EV-ATORi8/-8-7------------------- 17293 5527 THOMAS B. PAGE PARK CLEAN-UP,7/87 122.00 122.00 17294 5529 PACIFIC BELL COMP.PHONE 7.58 COMP.PHONE 7.58 --- -- - -- - -- E � O-.-C-� -PHONE- -------- - 31 . 13---------- - CIVIC CENTER PHONE877.01 877.01 PAY PHONE,CIVIC CENTER 25.35 PAY PHONE,CIVIC CENTER 31.43 980.08 172.95 5535 PAGING PLUS RENT PAGER,8/87 41.00 RENT PAGER,B/87 41.00 - 82.00 3 17296 5538 PATTON SALES CORP. OFFICE SUPPLIES 146.60 146.60 VOUCHPEG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE 08/11/87 VOUCHED/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS vnUCIIFP/ VFNO(IR VFNDUP ITfI' ITEM CHICK CHFCk NOV13Fk NUMN(R NAM1- 1)1SCR1E1(I(IN AMHUN1 AM(IONT 17297 5555 P E R R Y ' S STATIONARY AND OFFICE SUPPLIES 398.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.97 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 59.28 499.06 17298 5579 PEOPLE HELPERS,INC. REC.SVCS,7/15-7/31/87 21549.36 29549.36 17299 5581 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 28.96 PETTY CASH REIMB. 24.76 - - -- - ---- ---- - - --- - ---- - -- - - - - - - fl E-T T Y--CA 4H -REI M B-. - - - - 3 00 - -- - - --- - - PETTY CASH REIMB. 8.10 PETTY CASH REIMB. 34.36 - ----- - -- ---- ------ - - -- ---- --- ---- --- ----------PET T-Y-C-A �H-R EI-M B :---------- ----------- ----------5-1-9 5- - __-- ---- PETTY CASH REIMB. 43.34 �. PETTY CASH'REIMB. 4.23 - -- ---- - - ----------- -- ---- ---- ---------PET-TY-C-ASH-kEIMB.- -- - -- -- -----9.-26.. - -- -- PETTY CASH REIMB. 25.81 233.77 j - --17 3 0 0 - --- 5 5 9 5 - P I-T-N EY - B O W ES --- 5-1-2-8--------- -- -- RENT. POST'.'METER,9-11/87 51.28 102.56 17301 5670- ---- PRESS --ENTERPRISE COMPANY-- NOTI-CE"/PUBL-IC HEAPING 50.16 50.16 17302 6008 JERI WEISS-RAM LOCAL MILEAGE,RAM 41.25 41.25 17303 6124 RAY HEEMSTRA SIGNS SIGNAGE,C/C 223.77 223.77 6'14-4---- REC-0--REFR16ER-kT-ION-EOU-IP-CO. --_------R-EPAIk-A/C-eME'E-T--.RM.----- 129.26 -- -_- PROGRESS PAY.A/C,J.H.S. 609392.40 60,521.66 ? --- 17305- --- -62-75 --RIVERS-I-DE-BLUEPRINT--------- REE-ORD-/-T-R-A-GT-M-AP-5---- --- - - - --11�36-- ------ ----- - --- DRAFTING SUPPLIES 37.99 DRAFTING SUPPLIES 45.33 94.68 17306 6350 SWA GROUP G.T.GREEN BELT 1,478.58 G.T.GREEN BELT 83.97 1,562.55 17307 6458 SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF COPIER PAPER 113.40 UMBRELLAS/REC. 168.17 17308 6502 SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF STOP SIGNS 1,154.20 -- -- - - - - --- - - --- -- --- --- -- - --RAKE /-T-IN-E- FCtR K- - - - - - - 4 6 : 6 2- - - - - --- - -1 2 0 0 .8 2 17309 6555 SAN BERNAPDINO,COUNTY OF DUMP.CHARGE 6/16-6/30/87 64.30 DUMP.CHARGE. 6/16-6/30/(i7 10.00 DUMP.CHARGE,7/7-7/14/87 58.70 133.00 i 17310 6590-- SANWA-B-ANK----- -- - -- - LF-ASE PAYMEN-TiC/C-- 152,913.05 - - 1-52,913-:05- - 17311 6614 THOMAS SCHWAB MEETTNG,BOND ISSUE,SCHWAB SC MEETING,SCHWAB 25.50 26.75 t VOUCHFEG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATF 08/11/f•7 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOk ALL PERIODS V(1LiCIIFN/ VI Nh()k VI NDtIP I ILP' Clil-CI' NUM,BEF: lUMBE.R NAME OFSCkIE'TIIIP' SCJPIA MEETING,SCHWAB SCJPIA MEETING,SCH'WAB CITY/COUNCIL CONF.SCHW'AB LOCAL MILEAGE,SCHWAB 17312- -6655 --SYGN-Xr--M-A-INTENANCE--INC: `------SI-GtvAt-MAINT-,7/87--- - - REPAIR SIG.BART/PRESTON 17313 6682 SOU-TH--COAST RUBBER ST-AMPS -STAMPiCITY CLERK-- 17314 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY ELEC.2 LIGHTS,PARK 17315 6844 THE SUN AD,DEPUTY C/C " NOTICE-,PUBLIC'"HEARING ' 17316 6890 SYNDISTAR,INC. SLIDE PROGRAM,CRIME PREVENT. 17317 6967 TERRACE TRAVEL L.C.C.CONF.DE/BP 17318 - -7309- ----UN-ION-O-IL CO-OF-CACIfORNIA -----FUEL;TRUCK/LAWNKOWER------- 3 17319 7880 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY UPDATE CALIF.CODE } 17320 7887 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES GEN.PL'AN UPDATE GEN.PLAN,UPDATE I' TOTAL CHECKS IIIM - ( fit (K AMUUNT AMOUNT 26.75 37.53 18.75 - 44.00 179.28 ---219':48 ---- - - 141.46 360.94 21.25 21-:25 25.06 66.92 28.95 95.87 357.00 357.00 114.00 114.00 - - - - - -----68 .17 - -- - - ----6 8 . 1-7--- $ 42.78 42.78 49765.00 , 613.00 5,378.00 2739358.50 PAYROLL FOR JULY, 1987 43,249.35 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME--AND-ARE- NECESSARY-AND--APPROPRI-ATE EXPENDNURE3-FOR THE -OPERATION -OF THE--E1Tt. --------- THOMAS SCHWAB -- - -- - -- FINANCE DIRECTOR AUG 27, - 7 PENDING My GOUNCIL APPf OVAL VCIUCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE f'A DATF 08/20/P.7 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PFPIODS CHECK REGISTER NO.082787 VUUCHFF'/ VI r DIi F' VI r:UUk II I M III M CIit. LK CHICK NIJ r'HEP NutlbfF NAME 11FSCF'II'T IHN AMfIIJNI AMOUNT P5214 1871i CUMPLEIE BUSINESS SYSTFMS MAINT.COP!Ek,(SMALLI 295.00 291J.CJ P5215 62,`5 RIVFPSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CC OVERLAY KINGSTON 14,400.00 14,400.(,0 P5216 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/13,SCE 141.11 141.II P5217 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/13,SCG 64.11 84.11 P 5 2 1 8 3426 INLAND Er'PIRF L.C.C.MEETING,000NCIL 76.00 76.00 P5219 4634 MAIN LINE EMBOSSING BUSINESS CARDS 23.32 _ _ BUSINESS CARDS 23.32 BUSINESS CARDS 23.32 69.96 P 5 2 2 0 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/14,SCE 183.57 163.57 P5221 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/14,SCG 105.84 105.84 P5222 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/17,SCE 294.34 294.34 E- P5223 h730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/17,SCG 151.73 151.73 P52.24 SOUTHWFST CYCLING AD,TOLIR DE TERRACE 475.00 475.00 P5225 (.720 SU.CA.EDISUN COMPANY CASH PAYT.8/18,SCE 40.45 40.45 P522.6- _ 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH _PAYT_.8/18,SCG _6.14 6.14 P5227 2911 GRAND TERRACE W'OMAN'S CLUB AD,G.T.WOMANS CLUB 25.00 25.00 P5228 6629 SFCUkITY PACIFIC NAT.BANK L.C.C.CONFEKENCE,000NCIL 1,692.40 REDEVELOP.SLM.CRAWFORC 273.70 SCJPIA MEET.S_CH6A6 11.53 CHAVEZ,S.B.REIMB.EMPLOYEES 110.99 MEETING,RIVLRSIDE,SCHWAB 18.01 21106.63 17322 L.A.WAINSCOTT E ASSOC,INC. REFUND USE OF CDM.RM. 25.00 25.00 17323 JAMES 5TIEl',STRA W.W.D.REFUND STIENSTRA 7.20 7.20 17324 PATT BEAMAN W.W.D.REFUND,BEAMAN 11.47 11.47 17325 kACFILLLF PUIZ W.W.D.REFUNU,PUIZ 8.00 P.00 17326 l:RT'HOP DI FRIIP W.W.1).RIFUNG,I)FFkIT(1 9.60 9.60 17"327 U'_!�PRUWE R W.'W.D.P.EFUND,BRG'WEP 14 .40 14.40 1732P, .,FL KiwC, W.W.D.kEFLIN(:,KING 4.b) 11.cc, 1732 FU'DY ,, AVINb, f. LOAN n.W.0. RE F-Ui,(„MEF CLIRY S/L 16(:.12 166.b2 v COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM s 3A (a VPICHRFr, 1)I.TF GF/20/87 VOUCHEP/ VENDOR CHECK NUr4FR NUMBER 113JO 1134 17331 17332 1.7331 17334 17335 17336 17337 17339 17339 17340 17341 17342 17343 17344 17345 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE VOUCHFk/CHECK REGISTIR FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME OESCPIFTION ALL PkfI CUE:STRDCI ION k/k PI I'[ LIITON/L.0 P/P PARK,DEEERRY R/R AS PHALT, K ING/M.W. FOG SEAL,MIPIAM WAY _1223 ATET INFORMATION SYSTEMS TRANS.PHONE JACKS 1360 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER RENT COOLEkS,9/87,C/C BOTTLED WAItR,6/19,C/C 1491 1301LDER.S NFWS,INC. TRAFFIC CONTROL BOOK 1711 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF LIGHTS,BART/215,6/87 _1725_ __ ----- t\ORMANT.-_CADUETTE CA,DUETTE,6/15/87_ CAOUETTE,7/6,7/7,7/20/87 CADUETTE,8/17/87 1748 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEAN R/R,PARK (40AYS) 1798 GERALD COLE COLE,6/15/87 COLE,7/6,7/7,7/20/87 COLE,8/17/87 1899 SUSAN CRAWFORD CRAWFORD,8/87 CRAWFORD,8/87 2278 DENNIS L. EVANS EVANS,8/67 EVANS,8/87 2670 FIREMASTER CHEMICAL CD.INC. SVC.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 2730_ FUN SHIRT FACTORY T-SHIRTS,RECREATION 2950 HUGH GRANT L.C.C.CONF.GRANT _-_ GkANT,8/87 GRANT,8/87 3151 STANLEY HARGRAVE HARGRAVE,6/15/87 HARGRAVE,7/6 E7/7/87 HARGRAVE,8/17/87 1155 JERkY HAWKINSON HAWKINSON,6/15/P•7 I IA WK I N',ON, 7/6 E7/ //P HAWK IN%UN, 8/17/87 3163 HEALTH NET MFD.INS.DUGHMAN,9/87 MED.INS,B/T' E B/P,9/87 mFDICAL INS.Q/87 `IEDICAL INS.9/87 "'I DICAL Ir,-9/87 I I I M AMOUNT t0.lur 35C.00 1,623.00 1,840.00 180.00 42.00 33.25 31.25 227.84 25.00 75.00 25.00 80.00 25.00 75.00 25.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 36.64 24I.15 84.80 150.00 150.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 C.00 2`.00 82.11 1b4.22 164.22 164.22 21C.41 PAGE 2 Lh3L CK AMOUNT 4,b33.00 180.00 ?S.25 31.2', 227.84 125.00 80.00 125.00 300.00 300.00 36.64 241.15 384.80 100.00 10( .00 `r,UCHRE0 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PA(,E 3 GATE 08/20/87 VOUCIiER/CHECK PEGISTE--R FOR ALL PFk1(11)S VOUCHEP./ VFNDOk VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CIII'CM NUVRFP P:UM{SLR NAM[ DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ANOINT MIDICAL INS.9/87 14t.3, MFDICAL INS.9/87 74L.1i MFDI CAL INS.9/87 ,7.7s 1,�L5.57 17346 4347 LEAGUE OF CALII-ORNIA CITIES L.C.C.CONF.MATTESON 130.00 L.C.C.CONF.SCHWAB 130.00 L.C.C.CONF.SWAYER 130.00 390.00 17347 448.3_ __LOS_A_MIGUS LANDSCAPE MAINT,7,8_/87,BP 120.00 LANDSCAPE MAINT.7-8/87,CC 860.00 11000.00 17348_ _ 4640 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SVCS. TEMP.HELP,PLANNING 3bO.36 " TEMPHELP,CITY CLERK 49).20 TEMP:HELP, CITY CLERK 499.20 1,358.7b 17349 4658 BYRON MATTESON MATTESON, 8/87 67.89 MATTESON, 8/87 150.00 217.89 17350 ------ 4700 -- - - --- -O- - --- - -- RAY P'UNSN - - - - ---- -- --- -- -- MUNSON,6/15/87 25.00 f MUNSON,7/6,7/7,7/20/87 75.00 MUNSON,6/17/87 25.00 1Z5.00 r 17351 4718 MORGAN AND FRANZ LIFE INSURANCE,9/87 14.50 --------------- ------ ---------------------------------- ---- ------ -- _ ___.L_IFE_INSURANCE,9/87 i 14.50 _ - --- LIFE INSURANCE,9787 --- -- - - -- - 13.25 LIFE INSURANCE,9/87 21.75 - LIFE INSURA_NCE,9/87 20.50 LIFE INSURANCE,9/87 6.00 90.50 _17352 5529_ ______PACIFIC_ BELL COMP.PHONE 7.58 Camp PHONE 7.58 PAY PHONE,C/C 25.73 PAY PHONE,C/C 31.90 72.79 ' 17353 5538 PATTON SALES CORP. CHAIRS/TABLES,C/C 983.68 _-__--DRAFTING SUPPLIES 1,823.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.45 CHAIR/FIRE STATION 381.55 DRAFTING SUPPLIES 223.60 30,41.51 17354 5545 PETRA ENTERPRISES CITY LETTERHEAD 422.35 FALL BROCHUkE_,REC. 613.42 ENVELOPES 501.41 1,`37.16 1735ti 5576 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN PFENNIGHAUSEN,8/87 b7.to PCrNNI GIIAII`,I N,8/;}7 I "0.(IC [ .A9 17356 6285 k'IVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO WATLR.BAR1/PALM 31.9n WATER, CIVIC CFNTER 39C.F WAIVR, FIRE STATION l3b.h') WATTR,MV/AkLISS 39.68 VOUCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERPALE OATF C8/20/P7 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBFR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WATER,PARK/OEBERRY 1,462.52 —' WATER,PARK/MERLE CT. 4 58. 10 17357 r.720 SO.CA.EDISUN COMPANY ELEC.CITY BLDGS,(3) 119 .2 3 ELEC.CIVIC CENTER 3,140.98 _SLE_-C-.R/P_LIGHT_S- 129.45 ELEC.BART/PALM 5.80 ELEC,SIGNALS (4) 491.37 _- _ _ _ ELEC_.S_PRINKLERS/PARK___ ST.LIGHTS,7/87 2,542.16 17358 6730 SO.Cn.GnS COMPANY GnS,CITY BLU(2) 17.74 GAS,CIVIC CENTER 421.52 17359 7540 VALLEY DECORATING CO. CHRISTMAS_TR_EF,C/C 1,656.76 CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS 477.00 7553 FRAN VAN GELDER _ _ VANGELDER�6/15/87- _25.00 VAN GELDER,7/6,7/7,7/20/87 75.00 f VAN GELDER,8/17/87 25.00 17361 7582 VERTICAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PROCESS PARK.CITES 6 MO. 8.40 ------------------- -- --------- - -- -- ------------------ TOTAL CHECKS I CERTIFY_ THAT,_ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE OR AFORELISTED_CHECK S-_FOR PAYMENT -OF CITY.LIABILITIES _.HAVE _. ( BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OF THE CITY. '- - - -- - - -- - - -----TH�SCHWAS FINANCE DIRECTOR J J f AGE 4 CHECK AMJUNT 2,522.01 6,443.27 ,,39.2o 2,133.78 125.00 8.40 47,090.80 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - JULY 30, 1987 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on July 30, 1987, at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tern Dennis L. Evans, Councilman Susan Crawford, Councilwoman Hugh J. Grant, Councilman Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager/Community Services Director Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney David Sawyer, Planning Director ABSENT: Joe Kicak, City Engineer The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Larry Wilson, Praise Fellowship Foursquare Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilwoman Crawford. ITEMS DELETED FROM THE AGENDA Item 4A(2) Accept proposed Lease Land from Edison and develop in some manner. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Grant requested that Item A, Approve Check Register No. 072387, be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. CC-87-149 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Pf ennighausen, second by Mayor Matteson, ALL AYES, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Item B - Ratify July 30, 1987 CRA Action Item C - Waive Full Reading of Ordinances and Resolution on Agenda Item D - Approve July 09, 1987 minutes VOUkIL AGENDA ITEM # U Item E - Approve & Authorize entering into an Inter -Agency Agreement formalizing loans between the Agency and City Council Item F - Certificate of Commendation for Alicia Chavez. Item G - Approve Teen Challenge of Southern California's request for walk-a-thon and soliciting, and deny request for banner. Item A Councilman Grant stated he was curious about check number 172250; would like to know what the brass name strips for Council are. The Community Services Director replied the (to strips go with the photographs that are here in Council Chambers. Councilman Evans questioned check number 17163 to Green Earth Nursery, in the amount of $3,100 for new landscaping in the park. The Community Services Director replied this was renovation that took place on the easterly slope of Terrace Hills Community Park and staff had the contractor chemically weed treat the slope, remove the existing foliage and hydro -seed it with a new type of ground cover. Councilman Evans questioned check number 168, SWA Group, is that for services as it relates to the Canal, Grand Terrace/Mt. Vernon project? The Community Services Director replied it is the piece that is commonly referred to as the triangle easement. Councilman Evans questioned if he understood it correctly, check number 173 in the amount of $1,125 was part of what the Community Services Director authorized for upgrading slope trees for the park. The Community Services Director replied no, it was for tree replacement at Terrace Hills Community Park and the Civic Center. In addition, there were two trees acquired for Riverside Highland that were planted at Palm and Observation. He stated Riverside Highland Water Company will be reimbursing the City for that amount. CC-87-150 Motion by Councilman Grant, second by Councilman Evans, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. 072387. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Mayor Matteson a presentation presentation. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 2 asked if anyone from the audience wished to make at this time. No one wished to make a COMMITTEE REPORT Item AM Mayor Matteson read the minutes from the Emergency -Operations Emergency Committee, requesting advertising to fill a vacancy on the Operations Committee and to send a letter of appreciation to Dr. J. H. Tibbles who has resigned. CC-87-151 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, second by Councilman Evans, ALL AYES, to advertise the vacancy on the Emergency Operations Committee and send a letter of appreciation to Dr. Tibbles for his current service to the City. Mayor Matteson questioned if the Emergency Operations Committee were planning on painting the storage box. The Community 4 Services Director replied he had spoken to the Emergency Operations Committee regarding this and it was on staff's project list to complete. Parks and Mayor Matteson stated this item is to approve the Grand Terrace Recreation Athletic Scholarship for the Parks and Recreation Committee. Committee Item AM CC-87-152 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, second by Councilman Evans, ALL AYES, to approve the Grand Terrace Athletic Scholarship application form. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen requested the material be approved, as submitted, and that Council commend the Parks and Recreation Committee for the thoughtfulness and manner in which 44W the Committee put this together. She stated, that even though income level would have some bearing on selection, she hoped other factors would be considered when these applications are being reviewed. COUNCIL REPORT LAFC Councilman Grant stated, for the record, he represented the City at the July 15, 1987 Local Agency Formation Commission Committee meeting, at which time the Commission authorized the placing of the incorporation issues of three cities on the November Ballot. Mayors' and Councilman Grant stated that he attended Mayors' and Council Councils' Members' Executive Forum and felt it was well worth the cost. Executive Forum Post Office Councilman Grant stated he knew there had been some lack of enthusiasm on the letters he had received regarding the request for Grand Terrace's own post office. He stated he received a letter from Senator Pete Wilson indicating he concurred with Grand Terrace's request and had included a letter that he had Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 3 sent to the Postmaster General indicating he would like to see a post office in Grand Terrace. Councilman Evans questioned, since we are doing the City's General Plan and we are also going to be discussing the Commerce Center, is there any way to coordinate the two to add a little more emphasis for trying to get a post office in Grand Terrace. League of Cities Councilman Grant stated each Councilmember received from the Annual Conference League of California Cities correspondence indicating that cities must designate voting delegates for the League's Annual Conference. He stated, traditionally, the Mayor has %W been the voting delegate and his understanding is that Mayor Matteson will be attending. He stated the alternate would be the Mayor Pro Tem should she decide to attend. Mayor Matteson asked Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen "As long as you have that, is that the concensus of the Council?" Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she concurred with this except she will not be attending the conference in San Francisco. Councilman Grant stated he will not be able to attend. Mayor Matteson asked Councilman Evans and Councilwoman Crawford if they would be attending, and both answered they would not be attending. The City Attorney stated the next alternate does not have to be one of the Councilmembers and felt the next in line would be the City Manager, since he will be attending. Councilman Grant stated he would recommend that. San Bernardino Councilman Grant indicated he represented the City at the San Associated Bernardino Associated Government County Transportation meeting Government County of July 29, 1987. Councilman Grant stated Assemblyman Jerry Transportation Eaves and Assemblyman Bill Lancaster were at the SANBAG meeting Meeting and gave a brief presentation on legislation dealing with low tax. Councilman Grant stated in regard to the transportation sales tax, that the issue should be supported in order to give the people of this State an opportunity to vote on it. He stated the SANBAG Board did not vote approval whether or not it should be the tax, but to at least get it on the ballot to approve. He stated the good thing about it was that Grand Terrace's 50 percent would be the Barton Road overpass at the freeway, as well as the overpass at the Southern Pacific Railroad. In addition, they are now talking about the little bridge over the railroad track near the Stater Bros. warehouse which is now a part of SANBAG's time table. Councilman Grant asked should this be passed by the people, and should Council submit a resolution, as all cities are being requested, then it will become law? Councilman Grant stated the City is also a member of Cal ID, a computerized fingerprint system of which the law enforcement representatives are aware. He stated the Council's Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 4 allocation, which should have been set forth in the forthcoming budget or the budget we are now in, is $4,441.00 for Grand Terrace. He stated it was based on the population of 9,877 people, and the County Auditor Controller will be submitting a request for these funds to support this program. Councilwoman Crawford stated that she received correspondence from some members of the community regarding opposition to housing density west of the freeway being increased which was presented in an article in the San Bernardino Sun Newspaper, Thursday, July 9, 1987, which referenced the Planning Commission Meeting. Councilman Evans stated that four Councilmembers had an opportunity to attend the Executive Forum this past week. He stated that in part of the meetings they were given an opportunity to have an exchange with peers throughout the State. It was an eye-opener from the standpoint of not being a lost soul. All communities have the same problems and it's an opportunity to share ideas and reach a common concensus as to what we should do as a State, recognizing as a State, we are also a community that is united together. Sewer Capacity Councilman Evans indicated possibly two months ago, Council Study voted to fund a Sewer Capacity Study regarding the City's flow into Colton's Plant. He questioned if a tally had been completed as far as Grand Terrace is concerned, and if we have that information, is it going to be incorporated into the 4W General Plan? The City Manager replied they have implemented or undertaken the study, but it has not been finalized yet. He stated Grand Terrace has 1.6 million gallons per day capacity in the plan. The City Manager indicated on an average of a three-week period, it appears Grand Terrace's current capacity is about 1.2 million gallons. Water Shutoff Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated at a medical facility within the boundaries of Grand Terrace, several patients were in various stages of treatment when the water was turned off. She stated the professional individual verified that his water bill was late in payment, but at the time this occurred the payment was at the water company, which he was able to verify later. She indicated at the time this happened, a two-year old child was under sedation and the treatment the child was receiving required suctioning. She stated she felt this was totally inexcusable and felt it was the responsibility of the shareholders in this company to prevent this type of occurrence. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated to the Mayor that she would like a letter to go from the members of Council, who are all shareholders, and she would encourage the Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 5 shareholders throughout the City to either send letters directly to the water company or to members of Council or City Hall and they would be forwarded to the water company. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen requested that Mayor Matteson direct that correspondence to be sent as soon as possible. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen concurred with Councilman Evans' evaluation that the trip to Monterey was very enlightening. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen indicated Council received a lot of good suggestions and thanked the people of Grand Terrace for allowing Council to attend the seminar. Density West Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated in regard to the density of Freeway west of the freeway everyone will find out that the density allowable within the City is going to be less than it was before and that the residents on that side of the freeway have pretty much gotten what they asked for. Southern Calif. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen indicated there is a hearing Water Committee scheduled in Irvine, the Southern California Water Committee Hearing Incorporated, and she has been requested to attend this and report back to Council. She stated as much as she would feel honored to represent this City and bring back the report, she will be unable to do so. Mr. Arkebauer Councilman Grant stated he received some very distressing phone calls again from Mr. Arkebauer; that he called Councilman Grant almost in tears and was told by Councilman Grant that he did not have to put up with threats from neighbors and he should 4,, call the sheriff. Councilman Grant stated that he did, in fact, call the sheriff and he responded post haste. Councilman Grant suggested to Mr. Arkebauer that he should obtain a restraining order and Mr. Arkebauer said he would do so. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she would like to thank the party(s) that were involved before because they have left Mr. Arkebauer alone, and appeal to those who are attempting to make his life miserable now to do the same. Crime Rate Mayor Matteson stated the Riverside Press had an article on crimes in all the local cities and Grand Terrace again had the lowest crime rate in any city around. Councilman Evans stated maybe Detective Gilbert would like to address the sheriff's service lately. He stated during the budget session, Council had to decide whether or not to increase services at the expense of the Crime Prevention Officer and, fortunately enough, there were three members of Council who decided Grand Terrace should have the best of both worlds. Councilman Evans stated that since increasing the service, there has been a definite reduction in particular crimes that prevail within a community of this type. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 6 UNFINISHED RUSINFSS Detective Gilbert stated he became the detective assigned to Grand Terrace in July, 1986. He stated the burglary rate rose somewhat, although still lower than our adjoining communities. Detective Gilbert stated this year, particularly since assigning the second unit to the community, he has seen a decrease in crime. Councilman Grant stated that, as Detective Gilbert had indicated, the second unit has played a great role in this increase -in response time and the resolution and deterrence of these crimes. He stated, as the Mayor had also indicated, people are responding and people are taking it upon themselves to help police their own neighborhood. He stated these are things that, with or without any additional help or grant, would have happened anyway. He stated he was delighted to hear Detective Gilbert's comments on the reason he felt this good news occurred. Recessed City Council at 7:01 p.m. Recovened City Council at 7:16 p.m. Mayor Matteson asked whether there was any unfinished business. None stated. NEW BUSINESS faw Salary Ranges A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-13, AND ADJUSTING THE SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. The City Manager indicated that in accordance with Council directions, staff has taken a look at the job descriptions and titles. They were rated according to the system generally used, the Hay method, to come up with a new point structure affecting only five employees. He stated the average adjustment in the range itself is approximately 12 percent. With the range itself moving upward, the maximum amount that any one individual employee would probably receive would be about 10 percent. He stated that the total cost of the increase will be $11,169.00 per year. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen indicated that, after brief commendation to the staff for their report, she concurred with the new job descriptions and the evaluation of the new structure. She indicated that she felt the other Council members would support her in her commendation of the staff for the fine job they are doing. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 7 Councilman Grant concurred with what had been said and added that this is a continuation of the professionalism that has been in existance since the beginning; also concurred that the Staff Report was well prepared, well thought out and certainly justified. CC-87-153 Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, second by Councilwoman Crawford, ALL AYES, THAT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 87-13 AND ADJUSTING THE SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BE APPROVED. PUBLIC HEARING 6:31 p.m. Glenn S. Sharman The Planning Director indicated that on June 15, 1987, the 23175 Glendora Planning Commission considered an application by Mr. Glenn Drive Sharman for a lot split located at 23175 Glendora Drive and following the Public Hearing, the Commission denied the application based on the finding that the proposed parcel 2 was not in conformance with the City Zoning Code. He stated the applicant submitted a plan to split the existing parcel into two existing lots shown on the exhibit. The Planning Commissioner indicated that through the review of the project, several concerns have arose. Originally, there was a fire flow capacity requirement of 1,000 gallons per minute; the Riverside Highland Water Company had indicated the fire flow capacity in that area to be approximately 200 gallons per minutes. He stated that the Fire Department has since indicated to staff that a residential fire sprinkler system would be accepted in lieu of meeting the fire flow requirement. The Planning Director stated that the water company indicated that they will be able to adequately serve this project, contingent upon the receipt of an approval letter from the Fire Department. He stated that the City Engineer will require a joint -use agreement for the driveway, and that the City Engineer has also expressed some concern regarding grading which will be required for the second unit. Grand Terrace Municipal Code requires a minimum 60-foot lot frontage unless specifically approved by City Council, in which case a minimum of 40 feet may be allowed. He stated that the applicant has requested that the proposed private road easement be considered as street frontage, thereby providing parcel 2 with the allowable 40 feet of required frontage, if approved by City Council. He indicated that the configuration of the two parcels is an attempt to provide each parcel with adequate, usable yard space and meet the required set backs for the existing and proposed residences. He stated that, as proposed, the two parcels will meet all other zoning requirements. He indicated that staff's recommendation for the Planning Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 8 Commission was based on the fact that the newly created parcel 2 will not be in conformance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Section 18.15.050, Section C, regarding the requirement for street frontage for a parcel. The Planning Director stated that the Planning Department recommends that City Council uphold the Planning Commission's denial of the application based on that fact. He asked if there were any questions. Milford Harrison Mr. Harrison stated that he was speaking on behalf of Mr. 24899 Taylor St. Sharman, who was present. He indicated that what they are Loma Linda asking for in the application is a deviation from the standard practice, but they felt there were extenuating circumstances that would be appropriate for a finding of approval in this 4r appeal. He indicated that this is a common situation in many cities that have a unique area of this type; in most cities you will find this where you have your most exclusive homes, In this situation, we are asking for two houses to share the same driveway, a driveway that is quite adequate, protected by a retaining wall on one side, is beautifully landscaped, creates a very park -like atmosphere and entrance to these parcels. He stated that Mr. Sharman is in a situation where he either needs to sell this property and move to another location or try to create an additional lot where he can gain some additional revenue and maintain his residence there. Mr. Harrison stated that the evening before, Mr. Sharman took the opportunity of going around the area to the various homes in the vicinity for several hours with a petition. He stated 20 signatures were obtained in the space of three hours. He also indicated he had photos of the area if those would be of help. He indicated they were open for questions. Mr. Harrison made reference to another point regarding emergency access in case of an emergency that would limit access relative to the driveway. He stated that Mr. Matthews, who Council recently approved construction of a home on the adjacent lot, was present. He stated that Mr. Matthews was willing to grant a reciprocal easement to his property which would give them two accesses in case of an emergency, as well as a nice turnaround area for fire trucks or emergency equipment. Mr. Harrison inquired if there were any questions and, if not, he asked for a favorable response. Mayor Matteson inquired if there were any questions. Councilman Grant observations. He willing to have a prohibit concerns regard to future recommendation to Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 9 stated he had no questions, but had some stated that he believed the appellate is caveat in such an agreement that would as set forth by the Planning Commission in owners and, that he opposed staff's uphold the Planning Commission's denial. Councilwoman Crawford indicated that she also agreed with Councilman Grant that there were other exceptions in the town, and having the information that she has about Mr. Sharman's property, she felt it was an exception that the City could make. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that she only had one concern at that time and it was not with their project, but that the City Engineer had expressed some concerns and had to be aware that this was an Agenda item, but was not present to answer questions. As long as they are spending money on a contract, she expects to see Engineering represented; most especially when they are aware there is an item they have expressed concerns over is going to be on the Agenda, and she would appreciate if the City Manager would carry that message to their engineering contractor. She indicated that she had no problem after being on the site recommending in favor of the appeal. CC-87-154 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilwoman Crawford, to approve the Appeal on the basis of conformance of Engineering requirements by the Engineering Department and meet the requirements of the Planning Commission. Mayor Matteson inquired if there was anyone else who wanted to speak on this issue. 4 Councilman Evans stated that he wanted to address some questions to the City Attorney regarding easements. He inquired if there were any way that the easement could legally be written into the deed for both properties so that there wouldn't be any problems in the future. City Attorney Hopkins answered the question stating that he was certain it was written into the deed, but that did not ensure that there would not be problems in the future. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked whether or not, she understood correctly that Mr. Matthews has recorded easement over that same access, which would mean that they could not cut Mr. Matthews off or could not cut Mr. Sharman off. She stated it was not a problem for City Council, but a problem for them. Mayor Matteson interjected that he was sure that, since Mr. Sharman was going to be moving into the new house, he's going to make sure he has an easement across that property. City Attorney Hopkins indicated that as long as Mr. Sharman owns the property, it would be less likely that a problem would arise. Councilman Evans questioned whether the City would have any Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 10 future liabilities from legal documents that may be drawn up between the owners. . City Attorney Hopkins replied, "No Sir." Councilman Evans indicated that he had the same concern that was previously expressed regarding the City Engineer. He stated that in the Minutes of the Planning Commission of June 15, 1987 there was a comment on grading that may be required. The Planning Director stated that the comments that the City Engineer had made to him regarding his concerns included the pad that would have to be graded and how the unit on parcel 2 would affect the existing slopes in that area and the bank which slopes off at the very southern portion of the property. He stated that the City Engineer indicated that it was not a concern that would stop the map at that time, but it would require a grading permit and his approval before final map is approved. The Planning Director indicated that there may be a question as to whether or not Council approves it, that Mr. Sharman may run into a serious road block further down the road. He stated that whether or not this was the concern the City Engineer had, he did not know. Councilman Evans questioned if Council went ahead and granted Mr. Sharman's request and somewhere down the road if that did create an engineering problem, could they deny the project. The Planning Director replied that if it was a grading problem, it would be based on the City Engineer's approval of the Grading Plan; therefore, if he would approve it, there would be no problem. The Planning Director replied that was the impression that he had received. He also stated that any residential structure would have to go through site and architectural review, so the project would be looked at again from a site development point of view, as well as the grading plan. Councilman Evans stated that for the last 15 years he has had to live by the letter of the law versus the spirit of the law, because the letter of the law should be enforced, but you know the spirit of the law you should disregard it. He stated we have a very imperfect system and at times it has to be bent, for to apply the letter of the law in this particular case Mr. Sharman would not be able to develop his property. He stated that he supports the request as long as there is no other problems from an engineering standpoint, if the only thing hinges on the frontage. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 11 Motion CC-87-154 carried, ALL AYES, to approve the Appeal on the'basis of conformance of Engineering requirements by the Engineering Department and meet the requirements of the Planning Commission. Recessed City Council at 6:57 p.m. Reconvened City Council at 7:12 p.m. General Plan The Planning Director introduced Mr. Ross Geller, who is with Willdan and Associates. He stated that Mr. Geller prepared the General Plan portion of the Public Hearing. Mr. Geller addressed the General Plan and some of the incapatibilities that were raised, particularly as the medium density interfaced with the low density. The Planning Director discussed the renaming of RR, R1 and Al Districts and changes to development setbacks, lot coverage requirements and the removal of permitted agricultural uses in those districts. He stated that the amendments will be analyzed in the overall Environmental Analysis Report that will be completed with the General Plan update, and discussed at the upcoming Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for September. The residential proposed zone was addressed by the Planning Director. The Planning Director addressed site development standards and made reference to charts on same. He also discussed the architectural overlay district, making reference to charts on that subject. It was observed that Hugh Grant left the meeting at 7:56 p.m. and returned at 3:01 p.m. The Planning Director compared the General Plan designations discussed previously referencing the existing zoning map and the proposed zoning map. The Mayor asked if Council had any questions before he opened discussion to the public. Councilman Evans directed a question to Mr. Geller regarding the difference in the narative, which shows a total of 1718 versus 1513 and the graph which shows a total of 1164 versus 1513. Mr. Geller replied refering back to his discussion on the existing General Plan. Councilman Grant asked to elaborate on the points Mr. Geller was trying to make. Mr. Geller made further clarification regarding the units. He Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 12 said he could work it down to 12. Councilman Grant would be great and Mr. Geller replied okay. n n PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Councilman Evans stated that while they were on the subject of density, the General Plan in 1983 stated that the housing element had to go to the State for approval. He asked if this issue was going to have to go to the State for approval. Mr. Geller replied that the changes in the housing element will have to go to State. Councilman Evans questioned whether this issue was part of the housing element. Mr. Geller replied "Right." Councilman Evans asked what will happen if the State doesn't buy it? Mayor Matteson stated that they would probably have to revise it and negotiate more with the State. Mr. Geller stated that the changes that they could make did not necessarily affect the entire city. Councilman Evans questioned if he understood Mr. Geller that in the housing elements they had to have a higher density than what they were proposing now. Mr. Geller replied "Yes." Councilman Evans stated that what Mr. Geller was trying to do was keep a low density which would force the multi -family to be disbursed throughout the rest of the city. Mr. Geller replied "I didn't say that." Councilman Evans asked Mr. Geller if that is what he was proposing if the State didn't approve it. Mr. Geller replied "No," you identify an existing multi -family site and address a remedial program. Councilman Evans stated that he must have misunderstood Mr. Geller, but didn't want to face what they did in 1983. The Mayor stated he felt they couldn't second guess the State; that they should plan what they want and if they run into opposition they'll take care of it. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that she felt the point that Councilman Evans was trying to make was that they do not have a whole lot of developable area within the City to negotiate with the State. Recessed City Council at 8:25 p.m. Reconvened City Council at 8:40 p.m. Mayor Matteson invited those who wished to speak to make their presentation at this time. Ray Bicknell Mr. Bicknell stated he purchased his property in 1979 and at Garden Grove that time it was zoned R-3; then, in 1983 when the General Plan was proposed, it was still R-3. He stated that when they purchased the property, they paid a price based on the number of units they could get on the project and have paid taxes Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 13 since that time based on the price they paid. He stated that under the new proposal it would be a deviation on the value because they would get less units on it. He requested that the General Plan and zoning be left alone as it pertains to his property. Bill Addington Mr. Addington stated he represented the firm of J. F. Davis and 12055 Westwood Associates. He stated that they had a complete development Lane plan that was submitted and approved by the Planning Commission; then, it got caught up in the moritorium. He stated the plans conformed to the laws of the community and the State of California. He stated under the new proposal the General Plan is for the big property owners not the small. Gary Lawson Mr. Lawson stated that he was the person who was trying to 18180 Devonwood develop the previously mentioned piece of property and felt he Fountain Valley was getting a raw deal from the City, in that he had put up $25,000 in development, $6,300 of which went directly to the City to look at the plans; then, they passed the moritorium and he didn't get a hearing telling him yes or no, but they took his money and kept it. He stated he then presented a claim to the City to either leave his project alone or refund his money. City Attorney Hopkins stated that Mr. Lawson did present a claim for his fees and they did, in fact, act upon Mr. Lawson's project, that it went through the review process and was denied, which killed the project before the moritorium was passed and, therefore, there was no basis for them to authorize the refund unless the City Council desired to do so. 4 Eddie Hoague Mr. Hoague stated that he was also a property owner and had 11955 Rosedale plans proposed, fees paid, and then fell into the moritorium. He stated that he did receive his fees back, but that the proposal would be down zoning and would make his property worth about half of what it would be if it were zoned R-3. Randy Fuse Mr. Fuse asked if that area was going to be left light 2830 Grand manufacturing. He also asked if there were a fire or other Terrace Road damage to their property would they be able to build back 100 percent and, if at the time they sell or the property is inherited, would these rights be transferred to the other person. City Attorney Hopkins replied, "If they stay with the property." William Yiles Mr. Yiles stated that he agreed with Mr. Fuse and was satisfied 21840 Grand with the way it was as long as they were able to build back. Terrace Road Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 14 Brian Acres Mr. Acres stated that he owned a one -half -acre parcel that he 22855 Arlis Drive was going to build a 4-plex on, and under the new proposal he wouldn't be able to. He stated that he felt there was a lot of property owners in the area who didn't know what was going on and he would like to know what was happening. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked the audience, by a show of hands, how many of them understood what was going on. She indicated that they seemed to know. Councilman Evans stated that it was probably because he didn't live in the area; that the people in the area did know what was going on. Someone in the audience made reference to a meeting that took place. City Attorney Hopkins stated that there was a meeting that he understood was advertised in the paper, but it wasn't a City meeting, although some Council members were present. Larry Halstead Mr. Halstead stated the reason that most people were attending 21894 Vivianda these meetings were because they were up against many things living in that area, therefore, they didn't consider it down -zoning, but up -zoning. He commended the City for having gone to a lot of work preparing the plan. He stated he felt it was a good plan which addressed the issues. Shirley Hoague Ms. Hoague stated she didn't understand why the City wouldn't 4 11955 Rosedale let the two or three projects in the area develop as R-3 and do whatever else with the others. She stated their consideration should be acknowledged also. David Hess Mr. Hess stated that they should look at the quality of the community; that when they came to the community 10 years ago it wasn't too developed, and now it has become much more developed. He stated that he is sympathetic with the developers because they are trying to invest, but the Council has to decide what they want the community to look like. Eddie Hoague Mr. Hoague directed a statement to Mr. Hess stating that what they already have throughout that area is duplexes and apartments; that they wouldn't be building anything out of the ordinary. Bill Addington Mr. Addington stated that he felt the General Plan was a form of protection. Brad Billings Mr. Billings stated that he was speaking on behalf of his 7555 Sunset Dr. partner who owned a home on Rosedale that he was helping him Redlands rehabilitate. He stated that under the present plan that property is not zoned for horses, therefore, he was in support Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 15 of staff's recommendation to zone that area R-20 with the agricultural overlay is going to preserve a very special area and he is in support of it. Fran Van Gelder Ms. Van Gelder stated that she was speaking as a private citizen and not a Planning Commissioner. She stated that in regard to the R-3 zoning, they were not just talking about the number of units, but the number of people who will inhabit those dwellings and the resulting impact such as traffic, water, law enforcement and schools, not only on those persons, but those who are alreading living in the city. She respectfully requested City Council to consider the items she mentioned. 4W Ken McCellan Mr. McCellan stated that he felt it was the American way that 21882 Grand the majority rules. He stated that the people in that area Terrace Road want exactly what City has proposed and that Council has done a commendable job. Lois Pierce Ms. Pierce stated that she lived in a mobile home and she Grand Terrace and thanked the City for upgrading. Ann Marie Stoble Ms. Stoble stated that she was reiterating what everyone else 21945 Grand was saying that they are not against progress but disruption in Terrace Road their environment. She stated that she was in favor of the proposal. Gary Lawson Mr. Lawson stated that he was surprised that Mr. Hoague got his money back and asked how he could get his money back. 4 City Attorney Hopkins replied that Mr. Hoague's project was quite different in that his had not gone through all the staff reviews. He stated that Mr. Lawson's project went entirely through the Planning Commission process, which they approved, then it came to City Council and they disapproved it. He stated that Mr. Lawson could appeal to the City Council to refund his money. Mr. Lawson made a formal request to City Council to refund his his money for fees. Mayor Matteson asked Mr. Lawson to put it in writing and send it to the City Council. City Attorney Hopkins interjected that they have a request from Mr. Lawson's attorney. Mr. Lawson stated that that request was denied by the City. The Planning Director stated that claim was not only for the fees, but also included the design work and loss in profit. He Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 16 stated that if Mr. Lawson would submit a claim for $6,300, it would be taken to Council for reconsideration. Ray Bicknell Mr. Bicknell stated that in 1981 he submitted plans to the City and wasturned down. He asked if he submitted a claim, could he expect to get his fees back. Mayor Matteson replied that he could submit a claim, but that didn't mean he could expect to get his fees back. Eddie Hoague Mr. Hoague stated that he had requested the City to fix the road on Van Buren for about a year. He asked why City could fix their streets and not his. The Planning Director replied that he thought they had agreed that Mr. Hoague was going to install a curb. Mayor Matteson interrupted and stated that they were getting off the subject; they would have to discuss that issue at a later time. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighousen stated she wanted to address a few points. She stated that there was, in fact, a meeting that was held in a private home with residents to discuss their desires for the City. She stated there was also a Public Workshop Meeting held at the request of City Council, at which Mr. Geller officiated. She thanked the residents of the west side for finding out what the issues were and working to resolve them. She further stated that she opposed the Lawson project based on technical and circulation aspects that had nothing to do with density, and that he was given his day in court. She stated that, if a project comes in that will adversely impact the community, Council has the responsibility to tell that developer that he will have to mitigate the traffic problem or he will not be able to build. She felt they have come up with a plan second to none. Councilman Evans asked the Planning Director to elaborate a little more on the low density and medium density on the Residential Plan Development Specific Plan. The Planning Director stated it was in the General Plan Designation and Ross Geller could explain it better. Mr. Geller stated that it had nothing to do with density, but the number of units. Councilman Evans stated the main topic at the seminar in Monterey was educating the people. He stated that the General Plan is the most important document in the community because it is the backbone of the community. He stated that he applauds the residents of the community for getting involved when so many don't. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 17 CC-87-155 Mayor Matteson stated that the chair is going to propose a motion to accept 5(B), General Plan Amendment changing certain land -use designations in its entirety, except for the fact to limit the medium density to 12, with those bonuses it brings it up to 16 anyway, second by Councilman Grant. Mayor Pro Tem Pf ennighausen stated she would call to the attention of the Chair that not be totally in sympathy with the developers and not being totally in sympathy with the decision makers, there is a matter of economics that they have to deal with it in what they call a municipal budget, and as husbands and wives and homemakers they have to deal with a budget in that capacity, and most certainly developers have to deal with a budget also. She stated that decisions made where density alone is a factor, stops and she supposed some of them would really like that to happen except, the ultimate dollars it could cost in the courts would cost them more than they are going to say. She stated that 12 units to the acre with the criteria set forth by the general planning consultants for the special favors that would give them the 20 percent density, she felt that 12 units to the acre was too low; that they have asked the best consultants they could get to give them the recommendations that are realistic and she felt that they had those in five to fifteen. She stated that there is a break-even cost factor and at that time in history 15 is probably the break even. She stated that if they go any lower than that they will stifle development and they are asking for a day in court that will cost them many many dollars, therefore, she is not in favor of that change, but would be in 4 favor of maintaining the five to fifteen in that designation as recommended by the consultants. Mayor Matteson stated that the problem he had was if it was built out to maximum there would either be a minimum of 1,500 units plus the density bonus in that area plus the 1,000 plus the units up there; that gives them about 2,500 plus the units they already have in the city plus the mobilehome units; over half of the city would be rentals. He stated that the reason they have low crime rate right now is pride of ownership; most people here own thei►^ homes and they take care of them, they are proud of them, and if you turn the city into rental spot, you will lose all that and they will have the crime. He stated that scientists have proven the more you cram rats together the worse they are and the more problems you will have with them. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen directed her statement to the Mayor that she couldn't agree more, but they were not talking about rats and were not talking about cramming people together, but talking about 15 units to the acre, and that in essence is less than four times the density of a single-family housing tract, and the other thing she resents highly is the assumption that people who rent are of a lower class then people who own. She Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 18 stated she felt the most problems they have to take care of in the city, at least the ones she is sending staff people out to try to mitigate are people who own. She stated that whether you own or rent doesn't determine your quality, and she is getting tired of hearing that renters are crud and owners are quality; people are people and they are because of what they are. Councilman Grant stated that he certainly understands and can sympathize with some of those people, whether they are living here or out of town and have purchased the property for AW investment, but that sympathy fortunately or unfortunately, depending upon their point of view, cannot exceed his position traditionally for the last four or five years relative to the issue of density; renters are not crud, people are people and that is not the issue. He stated that the issue is and has been and will be, in his opinion, the problem of traffic congestion. He stated that he has been opposed to what they are apparently going to get along Mt. Vernon on the west side and will continue to be opposed to that primarily for that reason. He stated it doesn't take a genius to see how this town is laid out, and it also doesn't take a genius to figure out that it is not going to change much; there is only so many ways you can get in and out of this small town and he gets in and out of it twice a day and he has a heck of a problem around 5:30 or 6:00 p.m. and it's a pain. He stated that he felt that the density, as indicated in the motion, is a realistic one, it's consistent with his position on previous issues of density, particularly along Mr. Vernon and that is the reason he seconded the motion and he would hope that the remaining members of the Council would vote in favor of that motion. Councilwoman Crawford addressed her statement to Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen. She stated that she felt Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen was getting renters confused with out-of-town owners; that it should be fairly obvious that on a large rental project, the older it gets the more repair it needs and the more it costs to maintain it and the less maintenance it receives and the poorer it is for the general welfare of the community. She stated that she felt that was the general feeling against high -density rentals. She stated that she like the motion; pursuant to the conference that she went to on developer's fees in San Francisco, she would recommend that they would perhaps raise the bonus figure from 20 percent to somewhere in the area of 30 percent or 40 percent which would bring the maximum density up around 15 or 16. She stated the reason she suggests this is because this is a negotiating tool with developers. She stated that since Proposition 13, cities do not have the ability to raise revenues to fund the infrastructures of the City, like the roads, lights, police, fire, water, etc.; the way these things are funded is through developer fees, and if they have a negotiating tool like the Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 19 bonus, they can negotiate with developers. She stated this is the way they would get park lands perhaps, better roads perhaps, they might even get a school; Reche Canyon got a school this way within the Colton School District. She stated that she was suggesting that perhaps they consider that bonus percentage in that light. Mayor Matteson asked the Planning Director if there were a bonus percentage in there now. The Planning Director replied it's at 20 percent. He stated for information on the Mayor's motion for a maximum of 12 would be 14 density, 30 percent would be 16 and 40 percent would be 17. Mayor Matteson asked what 25 would be. Councilwoman Crawford stated that she believed that it was made very very clear that there are only specific ways that they could allow that bonus and if it were on a sliding scale that said up to then, if they had a project come in on one acre of land, they could award a higher percentage bonus and stay below 15 units per acre very easily. She questioned if that were not correct. The Planning Director replied he wasn't quite sure that he followed the last portion. Councilwoman Crawford explained that if they had a development (60 come in on one acre of land which would allow; The Planning Director interjected that one acre of land would be approximately 10 units under the 12 proposal; Councilwoman Crawford continued that if they even had a 50 percent bonus, a sliding rule then on a one -acre development would bring it up to 15 per acre maximum. Councilman Evans asked to interrupt and stated that he believed that if the Mayor checked the Planning Commission Minutes, originally he proposed a 50 percent density bonus and it was the Planning Commission, after long debate, who decided to bring it down to 20 and they had difficulty even living with that. Mayor Matteson replied that was correct. City Attorney Hopkins questioned if that was in the Zoning Ordinance and not in the General Plan. The Planning Director replied that it was in the Zoning Ordinance Proposal. City Attorney Hopkins stated the motion before them was the General Plan and not the Zoning Ordinance and asked the Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 20 Mayor whether he made the motion or not and Mayor Matteson replied yes. City Attorney Hopkins stated that he*assumed that the Mayor's motion was meant to include the adoption of first reading of an ordinance entitled, "An Ordinance of City Council, City of Grand Terrace, California, Approving General Plan Amendment No. GP87-2." Mayor Matteson replied that's exactly what I meant. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that she felt it was a lofty ideal to say they can build all the improvements in their City with developer fees imposed to get density bonuses, but it doesn't make much sense to her if to make a project cost- effective you have to build a minimum of 15 units per acre; that they start negotiating with developers for all kinds of improvements in order to get bonuses, in order develop at zero profit and that is not business and that isn't showing that they are using very good business sense there; that people have said that is why they want it in there to give the Council a good business sense, "Let's use some of that." She stated that she felt that they couldn't effectively develop at todays prices and give anything at 12 units to the acre. Councilman Evans stated that he could only whole-heartedly echo what Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen had stated regarding the entire matter. He stated that economics are going to dictate; it's unrealistic to go down to 12, but he attended a meeting of the Planning Commission when it was discussed and he had talked to the Planning Director regarding the whole matter and other colleagues on the Council said let's wait until they hear what the consultants have to say; they have spoken and are now ignoring what they have presented to them. He stated that he can whole-heartedly support what the Planning Commission came up with, what the Planning Director and the consultants have come up with, therefore, he cannot support the 12. Mayor asked Council to cast their votes. Motion CC-87-155 carried, with Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen and Councilman Evans voting NOE. Item 5(C) Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that at least if they Zoning Ordinance couldn't do the first thing right then do the second thing Motion CC-87-156 right. She stated now they've told them they can only build 12 units to the acre unless they are going to build a new city for them, give them a new school that will cost six million dollars or a park that will cost six million dollars or a flood control project that will cost 10 million dollars, we'll let them build four units to the acre more; three units to the acre more if they'll do that for us that shows real good business sense and that is said with tongue and cheek. She stated let's do something with the zoning code, especially the square footage part of the zoning code that will make it possible to do something sensible. She stated a minimum square footage Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 21 Ordinance 104 was instituted by a majority of the Council approximately one year ago and its entire purpose was pointed towards one project in the defeat of that project, and to show how little thought the passage of that ordinance was given where the part in that ordinance that says the number of square feet in a studio apartment will be 800 square feet, that is twice as big as double -car garage; a studio apartment. She stated that she got to thinking maybe there is something wrong with her because maybe people do not know what studio apartments are anymore, but she'll bet them that they will learn because they are the kinds of things that can accommodate students, singles and senior citizens with a minimum number of square feet that has a place for them to cook, sleep, eat and stay clean and that is all that is required, and she would propose that a studio apartment receive a designation of a minimum of 450 square feet; that is 50 feet bigger than a two -car garage; pretty good size room for one room. She stated then they have a classification called one -bedroom apartment or condominium. She stated she asked to have "or condominium" removed off the studio apartment before, because she didn't think you could have a studio condominimum, she didn't think anyone would buy it. She proposed a one -bedroom apartment or condominium based on present construction standards and what is going on in award -winning projects throughout their area, a minimum of 650 square feet and that makes accommodation for a bedroom that is approximately 15 square feet, which is a fairly good size bedroom and bigger then most single-family home bedrooms are that are being constructed presently; under two -bedroom apartments or condominiums, she would like to see that broken into two subs; a two bedroom apartment with one bath she would like to see changed to 850 square feet; a two -bedroom apartment with one plus baths; that can be one and one-half, one and three-quarters or two full baths to be 900 square feet, and a three -bedroom apartment or condominium which is big as a full-size house remain at 1,200 square feet. She stated that her rational for those changes were; the more studio apartments they build the less permanent residency they encourage in apartments, that horrible word, and they do not accommodate children that will impact their school system in studio apartments; one -bedroom apartments also does not encourage families with children, therefore, creating little, if any, impact on their school system and a maximum impact of one to two cars; the bigger the apartment, the more problems they are going to have to mitigate; a two -bedroom apartment is more likely going to involve either two or four singles, two couples, a couple and two children or more children, as many as they can stack on bunkbeds; that is throughout their city in single-family homes and, therefore, she would like to see no three -bedroom apartments ever allowed in the City, because she sees that as a real impact into their school system, onto their streets and making great demands on the public sector as far as Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 22 police and other things, but she does not know a way to separate three -bedroom apartments from condominiums unless she just says only three -bedroom apartments and not condominiums and that is not realistic because the one thing that she has noticed about apartments is that when people can't sell them they rent them and then they have apartments and they have three bedrooms. She stated that she would ask that the Council, reviewing quickly, studio apartments 450 square feet, one -bedroom apartment or condominium 650 square feet, two -bedroom apartment with one bath 850 square feet, two -bedroom apartment with one plus baths 900 square feet, three -bedroom apartment or condominium 1,200 square feet, and 4W give this consideration for amendment to the now existing Ordinance 104. Mayor Matteson asked what the rest of the Council felt about it. Councilman Evans asked if that was a form of a motion. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen replied it was her motion. Mayor Matteson asked Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen that her motion was to make the correction only. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen replied, "Right." Councilman Evans stated he would second it. Mayor Matteson asked if there were any discussion. Mayor Matteson stated that he felt the studio apartment was too small, 450 square feet is just too small by him. Councilman Crawford stated that she felt that if they had a small studio apartment like that, a 650 square foot one -bedroom apartment would have relatively low rent and as an owner of rental property she can vouch for her experience .you don't limit the number of children that you have in a one -bedroom apartment just because there is a one -bedroom apartment, it really doesn't limit the number of people, what determines how many people that is going to be in there, one is the lease agreement that he signs sometimes, because they will move more people in and the other is to lower the rent, the less desirable the people and the more problems that you will have and probably the more people per square foot ratio, so she is against it. Councilman Grant stated that he remembered as Ms. Pfennighausen remembers the discussion on it, when it was in fact discussed to death and he remembered specifically Mr. Petta's position on it, which he believed was a well-founded position. He stated Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 23 he still could not fathom that they agreed to reduce these to the extent that it is going to be difficult for people to sell their condominiums. He stated that they would be doing a disservice and, therefore, he would be opposed to the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen called to their attention that those were minimum square footages; she could build a studio apartment that had 1,200 square feet if that is what she chose to do; she could build a one -bedroom apartment that had 1,000 square feet if that is what she chose to do as a developer; they are saying what is the least they can do. City Attorney Hopkins stated for the purpose of the motion that was on the floor that he didn't believe the Planning Commission had considered that particular item; whenever you are amending a Zoning Ordinance, you have to have referred it to the Planning Commission first; you can change what was sent to you, but they would have had to of considered what they adopted; he didn't believe they had considered it; that doesn't mean you cannot adopt the motion. He stated he thought it was a proper motion, but it would have to be referred back to the Planning Commission if it were adopted. Mayo►^ Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that she just wanted to make sure that they didn't go through the revisions as submitted by the report. rr Mayor Matteson asked if Council wanted to send it back to the Planning Commission or did they want to call for a vote. Councilman Evans replied that he thought they should call for a vote and give the Planning Commission direction as to the way the Council stood. Mayor Matteson asked if there were any other discussion. None stated. He then asked Council to cast their votes. Motion CC-87-156 failed, with Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen and Councilman Evans voting AYE. Mayor Matteson asked Councilwoman Crawford the other item she wanted to discuss on the Zoning Ordinance was the bonus density. Councilwoman Crawford replied yes and wondered if they could move for acceptance or she assumed that reducing the density might give the Planning Commission cause to reconsider the bonus, could they leave the bonus out of the motion. Mayor Matteson replied they do not have to reconsider if they pass it. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 24 Councilwoman Crawford stated that she would like to recommend that they increase the bonus to 40 percent. Mayor Matteson stated he thought that was too high, he would buy it if it was 30. Councilwoman Crawford replied okay, she's selling for 30 percent. Councilman Grant stated he felt that staff's recommendation of 20 percent was adequate. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that the reality of it was the end product is going to be the same and no one has guts enough to call it what it really is, and you are not going to get a developer to buy into the program at 12 units to the acre he can't give you anything you are asking for and so you are just stifling total development and why don't you just have guts enough to say that. Mayor Matteson stated that the thing of it is they have a big development going on Mt. Vernon that was 12 units and they gave them a bonus of three and the project is going through, so that was not an accurate statement; that they will build at that and its economics they want as much as they can get, because the more units they can get the more money they can make. (6, Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen addressed the Mayor and asked him to keep in mind that they gave them that three density on a very very simple stipulation that it be for senior citizens which is or isn't enforceable, but it sounds good. She stated that what he was talking about in order to give a density bonus in that case is massive investment in the City of dollars and cents; he is taking away the capacity to make dollars and he is telling them they are going to spend dollars and they are not going to do it; that is not realistic; how much printing do you want to do for free. CC-87-157 Motion CC-87-157 by Councilwoman Crawford, second by Mayor Matteson, to increase the density bonus of up to 30 percent. Mayor Matteson asked if there were any discussion. There was none and asked Council to cast their votes. Motion CC-87-157 failed, with Mayor Matteson and Councilman Crawford voting AYE. CC-87-158 Motion CC-87-158 by Mayor Matteson to accept density bonus as is, Second by Councilman Grant. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 25 City Attorney Hopkins addressed the Mayor and stated that he assumed that was a motion to adopt an ordinance for the City of Grand Terrace, California, approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. Z-87-2 amending Chapter 18.12, reappealing Chapters 18.15, 18.18, 18.21, 18.24 and adding Chapter 18 to the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Mayor Matteson replied he took the words right out of his mouth, and asked if there were any discussion. Mayor Pro Tem Pf ennighausen asked what the motion was 4 specifically. City Attorney Hopkins replied that it was a motion to adopt an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as recommended by staff in the proposed ordinance they had in their packet. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen questioned that's 15 units to the acre; City Attorney Hopkins interrupted and stated that particular portion had been amended. Mayor Matteson stated in other words, they are accepting everything exactly as the whole package, the other part was they limited to 12, other than that it is exactly the way it came. Councilman Evans questioned if they had to make an amendment; the zoning is different than the General Plan. The Planning Director explained that the first motion was for the General Plan which dealt the 15 down to 12 for the General Plan Designation, but the Zoning Ordinance was not included in that motion, so if they just go with staff recommendation, technically the staff recommendation will be at 15 for those charts or if they want to keep it consistent with the General Plan motion . . . City Attorney Hopkins addressed Mayor Matteson and stated that he assumed that was part of the Mayor's motion to change the Zoning Ordinance to match the General Plan, that is a requirement you cannot adopt a different Zoning Ordinance then you do in General Plan. Councilman Evans questioned if you change the density is it going to completely change whole outline. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 26 The Planning Director replied to let him review what he would recommend they change the table footnote, Attachment H, Proposed Residential Zone, they have the footnote for the development charts, those numbers under dwelling units per square footage and dwelling units per square footage for the R-2 Zone and the R-3 Zone are all based on the 10 to 15; if they change that to the 12, he would recommend that the zero to ten, for R-3, would be 1 dwelling unit per 10,000 square feet; 10,000 to 20,000 square foot lot be one dwelling unit per 10,000 square feet; the 20,000 to 30,000 square foot lot would be one dwelling unit for 8,710 square feet; 30,000 to 40,000 square foot lot would be one unit for 5,450 square feet; 40,000 cr to 80,000 square foot lot would be one unit for 4,360 square feet and the 80,000 square foot plus designation would be one unit for every 3,630 square feet. He stated the densities would break down to 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and then 12; the last portion of the motion he wasn't sure was what the density bonus they were talking about then, 20, would then be with the density bonus would be 14. City Attorney Hopkins stated they could adjust it accordingly for the R-2 zone, was the intent of the Council. Mayor Matteson asked Council to cast their votes. Councilman Evans asked the Mayor to state again what they were voting on. 4W Mayor Matteson replied they were voting for it exactly as it is except, with the adjustments for the 12 units. Motion CC-87-159 carried, with Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen and Councilman Evans voting NOE. Mayor Matteson commended the Planning Department for the excellent job they had done. Councilman Evans asked why, you didn't follow the recommendation. Mayor Matteson replied, all but one item, that is pretty good, usually they are tearing them apart. Item 7(B) Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilwoman Crawford to CC-87-160 appoint Mayor as Director for the City to Southern California Joint Powers Authority and the City Manager as alternate. Mayor Matteson asked Council to cast their votes. Motion CC-87-160 carried, ALL AYES, to appoint ;Mayor as Director for the City to Southern California Joint Powers Authority and the City Manager as alternate. Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Page 27 Item 7(C) Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilman Grant, to CC-87-161 approve application for a soliciting permit for Teen Challenge of Southern California. Steve Morgan Mr. Morgan stated that they requested August 1 through August 8 for the soliciting permit. City Manager Schwab indicated that they recommended the solicitation be done only on weekends. Councilwoman Crawford asked whether or not they would be working in pairs. Mr. Morgan stated there would be no women and the men would be working in pairs, keeping visual contact at all times. City Manager Schwab indicated that, if Council desired, they could modify the recommendation and go with Teen Challenge's request for Monday, Wednesday and Friday, 12:00 to 7:00 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she had no problem, as long as they met the criteria as in the past. She commended them for their good work on drug abuse rehabilitation. Motion CC-87-161 carried, ALL AYES, to approve application for a soliciting permit for Teen Challenge of Southern California. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m. until the next regular City Council Meeting which will be held Thursday, August 27, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Deputy City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor Council Minutes - 7/30/87 Paqe 28 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XIS MEETING DATE: AUGUST 27, 1987 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT ATTENDANCE AT THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE OCTOBER 4-7 1987 IN SAN FRANCISCO CA. FUNDING REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING REQUIRED The League of California Cities is holding its 89th Annual Conference in San Francisco, October 4-7, 1987. Attached is a summary of the program. The Mayor, City Manager and Planning Director wish to attend the Conference. Sufficient funds are available for this in the 1987/88 budget. �!) STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTENDANCE OF THE MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND PLANNING DIRECTOR AT THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD OCTOBER 4-7, 1987 IN SAN FRANCISCO, CA. TS:ma Attachment U1!%IL' AGENDA ITEM a ,3G CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS As indicated in the program section of this announcement, the Confer- ence combines education with policy development All of the Conference sessions are designed to be instructive and practical, and a number of them serve to develop and confirm the official policies which will guide the League as it represents cities' interests in the year ahead The Opening, Second and Concluding General Sessions will serve as focal points for the Conference theme "We The Cities." Please refer to the detailed outline for a schedule of all the topics which will be covered Most Con- ference program sessions will be held in the Moscone Convention Center, located in downtown San Francisco on Howard between 3rd and 4th Streets A shuttle bus system will operate throughout the Conference between the hotels and the Center (approximately 5 blocks) Ample parking is available near the Center for those commuting WHO SHOULD ATTEND The Annual Conference is the high- light of the year for city officials, bringing them together from throughout the state to learn, discuss and debate the issues of greatest importance to local govern- ment Mayors council members, commissioners and staff in all municipal functions will find the Conference offers a unique opportu- nity to stay current on many mat- ters affecting cities and to make and renew professional contacts which can be so vital in efficiently conducting the public's business The Conference affords valuable ed- ucational opportunities, both formal and informal ABOUT THE LEAGUE The League of California Cities is the cities' own organization, estab- lished to provide the means by which they can work together to represent their common interests and those of their citizens City offi- cials themselves determine League policies and programs, assuring that its diverse array of services are those which best meet the needs of cities Among the League services are legislative advocacy on behalf of cities, both in Sacramento and Washington, educational programs on subjects of concern to city offi- cials, research and information exchange to help officials perform their duties more effectively, and legal assistance to city attorneys in guiding their agencies in the intri- cacies of the law These services are available to all city officials, elected or appointed, by simply contacting the League Of course, officials are encouraged to actively participate in League affairs, for the League is only as strong and effective as city officials, by their involvement, make it. This spirit of cooperation and mutual strength is captured in the League motto, "California Cities Work Together." TENTH ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EXPOSITION The Tenth Annual League of Cali- fornia Cities Exposition will be held in conjunction with the Annual Conference The Exposition will contain more than 140 exhibitors featuring services and products which assist cities in more effi- ciently delivering services to the public Private firms, consultants and public sector agencies are par- ticipants in the Exposition. All city officials and guests attending the Conference are urged to spend some time in the Exposition area exploring new ideas on how to better serve the public The Expo is your "one -stop munici- pal shopping center" for informa- tion on such a diverse array of services and products as • com- puter software • communications systems • recreation and park ac- cessories • public works equipment • public safety products • codifica- tion and election services • trans- portation systems • financial products and services • housing products and services • land use management systems • engineering services • management consulting services • and much more There will be a hosted wine recep- tion in the Expo Area from 4 30- 6 00 p m., Sunday, October 4 and a continental breakfast in the Expo Area on Tuesday, October 6, from 8 15 to 9 00 a.m. You are also urged to take advantage of some of your free time, especially between sessions mid -day on Monday and Tuesday, to visit the exhibit area. A no -host lunch will be available in the Expo Area on Monday and Tuesday, making it convenient for you to both get a quick snack or lunch and to enjoy the exhibits Plan now to spend time during the Conference in the Expo, open Sunday -Tuesday, October 4-5-6, and learn what is new in the municipal marketplace SPOUSES PROGRAM Several activities of interest to spouses will be planned Informa- tion on these activities and other events occurring in the Bay Area during the Conference will be pro- vided in subsequent publicity Watch for iti HELP MAKE LEAGUE POLICY Resolutions Procedure: Policy development is the primary purpose of the Annual Conference It pro- vides cities an opportunity to focus attention on home rule and prepare a positive program to strengthen cities, the level of government closest and most responsive to the public Therefore, each city is urged to have at least one official attend the Conference as its voting delegate and participate in the policy devel- opment process to assure that the policies and programs the League pursues are responsive to and have the full support of all cities Resolutions may be originated by city officials, cities, regional divi- sions, functional departments, pol- icy committees, Board of Directors or petition at the Conference So that all city officials will have full opportunity to consider resolutions in advance of the Annual Confer- ence, resolutions must be submit- ted to the League at least 45 days prior to the Annual Conference Resolutions to be considered at the 1987 Annual Conference must be received by the Sacramento office of the League not later than Thurs- day, August 20, 1987 For those issues which develop after the normal 45 day deadline, a resolution may be introduced as a petition signed by 44 designated voting delegates and presented to the President of the League not later than 24 hours prior to the time set for convening the Annual Busi- ness Session of the General Assembly POLICY DEVELOPMENT CALENDAR August 20 — Deadline for receipt of resolutions by the League's Sacramento office August 20 — Deadline for receipt of nominations for the General Resolutions Committee September 2-3 — Policy committee meetings to make preliminary recommendations on resolutions September 15 — Resolutions with preliminary recommendations mailed to all cities October 4-6 — Pick up voting card in League Registration Area, Moscone Convention Center. October 4 -- Policy committee hearings at Annual Conference to review preliminary recommen- dations on resolutions assigned to each committee October 5 — General Resolutions Committee meeting, 1 30 p m., Moscone Convention Center. October 6 — Annual Business Session, consideration of resolutions by General Assembly, 2 00 p m , Moscone Convention Center PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE OVERVIEW (All sessions in Moscone Convention Center unless otherwise indicated) Sunday, October 4 11:00 a.m. Conference Registration Opens — Moscone Convention Center 11:00 a.m. ''City Hall'' Opens 1:00 P.M. Policy Committee Meetings 1:45-3: 00 p.m. Seminar Sessions 3:30 p.m. Opening General Session Opening Ceremonies Welcome Nominating Committee Report Keynote Address 4:30-6:00 p.m. Exposition Open — Hosted Reception Evening Free Monday, October 5 7:30 a.m. Division Breakfasts (optional, at hotels) 8:00 a.m. Registration Opens — Moscone Convention Center 8:00 a.m. ''City Hall'' Opens 9:00 a.m. Second General Session Annual Report to Membership Keynote Address 10:30 -11:45 a.m. Department Meetings and Programs 11:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Exposition Open 12:00 p.m. Bicentennial Luncheon Special Program 1:30 p.m. General Resolutions Committee Meeting 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Seminar Sessions 6:00-7:30 p.m. Host City Reception at San Francisco City Hall Evening Free Tuesday, October 6 7:30 a.m. Special Interest Group Breakfasts (at hotels) 8:15 a.m. Registration and ''City Hall'' Opens — Moscone Convention Center 8:15 a.m.-2:00 p.m. Exposition Open (no -host continental breakfast and lunch available in Expo hall) 9:00 a.m.-12 noon Seminar Sessions 2:00 p.m. Annual Business Session Report of the Resolutions Committee 2 : 00 - 5: 00 p.m. Seminar Sessions Evening Free Wednesday, October 7 (Wednesday sessions will be held at the Hilton, Ramada and Nikko hotels) 7:30 a.m. Special Interest Group Breakfasts 8:00 a.m. Registration and ''City Hall" Open 8:30-9:45 a.m. Seminar Sessions 10:00 a.m. Concluding General Session Introduction of New Board of Directors Installation of Officers Presentation of the Helen Putnam Award Concluding Keynote Address The American Presidency At The Bicentennial Hugh Sidey, Washington Contributing Editor, Time Magazine 12 Noon Adjournment DEPARTMENT SESSIONS Monday, October 5 10:30 -11:45 am Mayors and Council Members Bus,iness Session Speaker Regis Nlcko nna Author & President, Regis McKenna Inc Sunnyvale City Managers Business Session City Attorneys Business Session Program nl.torlw� C'11clit Rohl tons in Cities City Clerks Business Session Program Professionalism in the City Clerk's Office Fiscal Officers Business Session Program Computerizing City Input to The State Controller's Report Fire Chiefs Business Session Program State Fire Services Training Status and Needs Police Chiefs Business Session Program Attorney General's All -Zone Meeting, Legal Update Planning & Community Development Business Session Program Making the Public Feel Welcome at Meetings Public Works Officers Business Session Program Report from the Legislature Recreation, Parks & Community Services Business Session Program Promoting Community Services in Your City A Look at Different Strategies A l P CONFERENCE SESSIONS AND WORKSHOP SUNDAY, OCTOBER 4. 1987.1:30-3:00 a.m. Small Cities: General Planning Basics for Small Cities (or Understanding and Using Your General Plan) — ir A basic review of the General Plan, its elements and the role it plays in the local planning process, with emphasis on small cities (Small city sessions are directed to officials from cities under about 15,000 population ) The Political Stage: Practical Roles in the Public Policy Domain — An insightful seminar with Bill Daniels on * * reconsidering the roles and practical relationships of elected officials and staff in a public, political setting What's Happening in Liability and Insurance — An update on sources of insurance and pooling, and on tort reform efforts *1 The Brown Act — A discussion of the fundamentals, principles, pitfalls to avoid, and implementation of recent legislative amendments * * * * * * Zoning and Alcohol: Beyond Gas Stations — A session on how to regulate and control proliferation of alcoholic beverage outlets and how to prevent and handle associated law enforcement problems MONDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1987.2:00-4:45 p.m. * * The Clean Water Act and Storm Drain Discharge — What the law allows and requires regarding storm drain discharge, washdowns and treatments. Effective Public Contact Skills — A valuable workshop with Linda Goldzimer considering techniques and processes by which to * * * * * * * * * * make your contact with your constituents — individuals, community groups and organizations — more effective and productive * * * * Fiscal Potpourri — An exploration of - Practical advantages of a single audit - Making an effective presentation to a bond rating agency - Recent litigation and legislation regarding reimbursement of state mandated costs Controlling Stress and Workers' Compensation Disability Costs — A practical seminar on an array of steps cities can take to control stress and physical disability costs while still being fair to the employee and the public, ranging from pre-screening to effective management steps to rehabilitation Developer Fees: Understanding and Using Fees and Legislative Update —A basic overview focusing on how developer k yt �Ir �r fees are set, the policy implications, and the relationship between fees and rate of growth, with special attention to school construction fees The legislative update is a technical review of recent legislation concerning developer fees, focusing on changes and what you can and cannot do * * * * New Investment Instruments Under the New Tax Law — A look at options now available to cities to use new investment vehicles such as mutual security funds to realize better returns on your city's funds (2:00-3 15 p m ) * * * The Future of Spending Limitations — A briefing on the political reality and activities regarding possible adjustments to the Prop 4 spending restrictions (3:30-4 45 p m ) Small Cities Economic Development: How to Work With Developers (Case Studies) — Highlights of successful economic development projects in small cities, resources available for information and assistance (this session will not solve your economic development problems, but will help you get on the right track) Legal Issues: The Taking of Private Property, the Regulation of Signs and Billboards and Acquisition of * Utilities — Legal presentations covering - Eminent Domain Update - Inverse Condemnation - Regulation of Outdoor Advertising - Acquisition of Utilities Building Community Consensus — A seminar on processes and techniques to ease the pains of community dissent and the dilemma of the NIMBY (Not -In -My -Back -Yard) syndrome. * * At -Risk Youth: Creative City Programs — A look at cooperative programs with schools, the mental health community, and drug * * program providers directed at at -risk youth, who may fall through the cracks of traditional programs (2-00-3 15 p m ) Crime in the Parks and Other Public Places — How to address the growing problem of crime in our parks, libraries, museums and other community service related areas, focusing on enlightened law enforcement, park rangers and how to prevent crime in a humane way (3.30-4 45 p m ) �03 v9 vy r 9 9 G N CP CONFERENCE SESSIONS AND WORKSHOPS * * The California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Program — A panel discussion of the pros and cons of the Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Program — also of interest to personnel managers (2-00-3 15 p m ) * * * FLSA and the Best Fire Duty Schedule — A debate of the relative benefits of the 27 day v the 28 day work period for firefighters under the Fair Labor Standards Act. (3-30-4:45 p m.) TUESDAY MORNING, OCTOBER 6, 1987.9:00-11:45 a.m. Understanding Personnel and Executive Compensation Programs — An overview of the practical and policy implications * * * of personnel systems from the Council's perspective, with particular emphasis on the role of executive compensation and on at -will status it Legal Issues: Employee Relations — Legal presentations covering • FLSA • Affirmative Action • Wrongful Terminations Managing the Effects of Growth on Small Cities — An exploration of how big is too big and how fast is too fast, emphasizing * * * * * * * the infrastructure demands from growth and negotiating with developers Helping the Homeless, the Hungry and the Mentally Ill: Innovative City Programs — A look at a vai iety of city programs designed to serve the homeless, the hungry and the mentally ill homeless in our communities, focusing on cooperative programs with other organizations. The Future of Infrastructure Financing — A briefing on the latest funding sources and mechanisms available to cities to fund * * * needed infrastructure improvements. (9:00-10:15 a.m ) * * Caltrans and the Future of Your Transportation Project Funding — A discussion of the changing policies and * procedures of CALTRANS regarding match requirements for funding local projects (10:30-11 45 a.m ) Redevelopment Basics — An overview for the "uninitiated" on the process, procedures and laws of redevelopment. (9 00-10-15 a m ) Redevelopment Update — A briefing for those involved with redevelopment activities on the latest changes in the field, with emphasis * * * * on financing mechanisms. (10-30-11-45 a m ) Legal Aspects of Key Fiscal Issues — A series of briefings on a variety of topics including what is a tax and a fee under Prop 62, business license exemptions, use of certificates of participation, billing for emergency response calls, definitions of gifts of public funds; and council v treasurer authority for investing funds * * * Cable Franchising — A review and discussion of the key issues affecting cities facing franchise renewal or sale of a cable company, including a brief review of some of the legal issues involved (9-00-10-15 a m ) Telecommunications and Planning — An examination of ways to incorporate cable and other telecommunication issues into your * * * city's planning process, including the benefits of inventories, I -Nets, use of specific plans, etc (10-30 - 11 45 a m ) Strategies for Drug Abuse Resistance Education — How to develop a successful drug prevention/suppression program, using a * * * * system -wide interagency approach. (9:00-10:15 a.m ) The Role of Cities in Child Care — A look at the role of cities as facilitators in promoting child care (10 30-11 45 a m ) Is Your City Prepared for a Major Disaster? — Roles and responsibilities of all city personnel in preparing for a major emergency such as a flood, earthquake, or other disaster Increasing Your Effectiveness as a Local Leader — A seminar workshop with Robert Moawad on ways to become more * * * * * * * * * influential in your dealings by developing clearer perceptions of your city's goals and your own potential TUESDAY AFTERNOON, OCTOBER 6, 1987.2:00-4:45 p.m. * * * * * * * * Small Cities Employee Relations and Contract Negotiations — A review of strategies which are effective in contract negotiations, emphasizing examples from various cities, and how to reach agreement. (2:00-3 15 p m ) * * * * Small Cities Mock Council Meeting — An educational and humorous look at effective and legal council meetings (3 30-4 45 p m ) O 09 ?'F Gy R` !9 9yt� 9Cc� GAO c+9% c0� * * * * * k * * * Creating a More Workable Workplace — A workshop with Dr Mel Le Baron on actions which can create a more productive and cooperative behavior in the workplace it Records Management — Techniques for all city records — what works and doesn't work, new technologies, case studies Developing Public Support for Tax Measures — Voters are now required to approve G 0 bond issues, Prop 4 overrides, Mello * * k Roos financing, general tax increases (Prop 62) and special tax increases (Props 13 and 62) This session will address the law and practice of such elections, and use case studies to explore strategies for success (2:00-3 15 p m ) * * * * * The New Tax Law and Local Debt Financing — A look at the opportunities offered by the new federal tax laws regarding debt financing vehicles, including how and when to use taxable bonds and the future of revenue anticipation financing (3 30-4 45 p m ) * * * * The California Water Policy Debate: Issues Status — A review of recent development in California water policy, including an explanation of the California water policy puzzle, current legislation, and the League's Water Policy Statement. * Legal Issues: Recent Litigation and Legislation Affecting Cities — A review of • General litigation • Employee relations litigation • Civil Rights (Section 1983) Actions • Legislative update * * * Residential Design Review — A consideration of the factors and processes involved in setting and enforcing residential design standards (2:00-3:15 p m.) Creating and Using Urban Open Space — A review of how to assemble open space for public ownership and use the activities of * * * * the Trust for Public Land, as well as ways to make your city an attractive, vibrant place in which to live (3 30-4 45 p m ) �r -* * New Dimensions in Police Training — Ways to reduce negative side effects of police training, organizational structure and subcultL * * * * * * * Economic Development: Marketing the City by Cable — How to use your cable system and community programming channels to educate your constituents about city programs and services (2:00-3 15 p m ) * * * * * Economic Development: Marketing the City by Video — A discussion and sampling of various uses of video to help promote your city, including attracting industry, improving bond ratings, and promoting community pride (3 30-4 45 p m ) * * * Coordinating Responses to Hazardous Materials Spills — How can you foster interdepartmental cooperation in response to haz mat spills? Learn of examples and practical procedures including checklists, sources of clean-up materials, and disposal techniques WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1987. 8:30-9:45 a.m. *I*- Stress and the Public Official — A look at some effective techniques to ease some of the stresses which face public officials * Managing Public Safety Innovations — A panel discussion focusing on identifying and implementing leading innovations in law enforcement including use of technology, entreprenurial activities, strategic planning and civilianization Air Quality Update: This Affects Your City — A discussion of state and federal regulatory activities, including recent activities at the state and local air quality district level, pending federal legislation to extend deadlines for municipal non -attainment areas, the potential implementation of sanctions, and the role of local government in mitigating air quality problems What is the Lowest Responsible Bid? — How can a city recognize and eliminate irresponsible bids? How can a city avoid or prepare for litigation over city construction projects? * * Update on Election Laws — A briefing for attorneys and clerks on ballot summary legislation, what issues are subject to referendum, and legal advice by clerks. Educating the Community About Fire Prevention — Importance of and techniques for effective public education on fire * * * prevention and protection, including examples of successful city programs. The New Era of Recycling — A report on the steps necessary for cities to take to implement the recent bottle recycling legislation * * * Regulatory Taking of Property — A discussion of the recent U S Supreme Court case requiring the payment of damages for regulatory takings and its impact on th Jnning process. ADVANCE REGISTRATION PROCEDURE You are encouraged to register in advance (lulv,tncn rn(Jistrants un- lilu I,c1 ,1I,1.1.1 lrl will Iuc.ulvc; 1(11funds of the full registration fee less a $10 processing charge in accordance with the advance registration re- fund policy) Please fill out and return the attached Advance Re- gistration Form with a check or money order in the appropriate amount Please, no purchase or- ders You may register with a city check or a personal check, but we cannot accept credit cards for reg- istration. Make checks payable to ''League of California Cities '' When your advance registration request is received, a receipt in acknowledgment will be mailed for each delegate registered Each del- egate should bring this receipt to the Conference and present it at the Advance Registration Desk in the Convention Center Lobby and pick up his or her badge and pro- gram Registration will open at 11 00 a m on Sunday, October 4 and continue throughout the busi- ness hours of the Conference Registration Fee: The regis- tration fee for the 89th Annual Conference will be Full One Day Conference Only' City Officials $115 00 $60 00 Non -City Public Officials $125 00 $70 00 Non -Public Officials $130 00 $75 00 (Spouses of registrants will be registered without charge ) `Note: A new, one -day registration fee has been added to make it easier for city officials, especially mid -level staff, to participate in the seminar sessions and workshops on topics of concern to them. Please note If you advance register someone other than yourself, be sure they are notified and given the advance registration receipt which instructions on the advance regis- tration form. No meals are included in these luyJUArtt.lain [uu:> I lowuv(l, you ut,ry reserve a ttcket for the special Bicentennial Luncheon on Monday, October 5 To do so, include that information as indicated on the Advance Registration Form. (Because of meal guarantees, meal tickets cannot be refunded after October 1 ) Deadline: Advance registration forms must be mailed on or before Friday, September 11, 1987 If your registration is not sent by that date, please register on -site when you arrive in San Francisco On Site Registration: Persons not advance registered should proceed through the on -site registration pro- cess at the Conference by filling out a registration card and taking it to the cashier. Note: We cannot accept credit cards for registration, only cash or checks Advance Registration Refund Policy: Advance registrants unable to attend will receive refunds of the full registration fee, less a $10 pro- cessing charge, by sending a writ- ten request before December 1, 1987 to the League of California Cities, Conference Registration Office, P 0 Box 7005, Lafayette, California 94549 (Luncheon tickets cannot be refunded after October 1 ) City Attorney Papers: The City Attorney's Department publishes in advance the legal research papers which will be delivered at League meetings While these papers are primarily for city attorneys, occa- sionally other city officials desire the published papers as well (A very limited number of copies of individual papers will be available at no charge at the legal sessions during the Conference, extra copies will be mailed according to your may be obtained from your citymw attorney) The papers are bound and available at the Conference on an advance - order basis, a limited number of uopw!. will rtl:,o 1w avnilaltic fcn 1nu chase at, or after, the Conference 11 you wish to order a set of the City Attorneys' papers, please indicate so on the advance registration form and return it with the $25 purchase price to the League's Conference Registration Office A copy of the City Attorneys' papers will be avail- able for the indicated person to pick up in the Registration Area at the Conference (These papers may be ordered after the Conference — while supply lasts — for the above price plus tax and shipping ) Bicentennial Luncheon: In recognition of our Constitution's Bicentennial, a special Luncheon is scheduled during the Conference on Monday, October 5 The pro- gram will feature a special entertaining and informative presentation on the Constitution You may reserve space at the luncheon when you advance regis- ter for the Conference by marking the form as indicated and including payment. At the Conference you will receive a coupon as you regis- ter, which you should exchange for a Luncheon ticket. Tickets may be purchased on site on a space avail- able basis only (Luncheon tickets may be canceled and money re- funded up to October 1 ) HOTEL RESERVATIONS The League will be using sleeping rooms at 21 hotels in the downtown San Francisco area. The hotels are listed on back cover. The San Fran- cisco Hilton & Towers will serve as Conference Headquarters Most Conference sessions and the 10th Annual Cities Exposition will be held in the Moscone Convention Center, 747 Howard Street, be- tween 3rd and 4th Streets The Wednesday Conference sessions will be held in several of the major holrl:-. 1'11e Loayuu has t :.uf va;�f o block of rooms at special reduced rates at a number of hotels near the Moscone Center. The League of California Cities Housing Bureau will handle all sleeping room reservations on a first -come, first -served basis Please use the attached Hotel Reserva- tion Form when making hotel re- servations Hotel reservations will not be accepted by phone, but only on the official housing form Be sure to indicate all your choices of hol.els to eVj)cclltr colrip!cring resur- vatrons If accorninodations are not available at the hotel of your first choice Reservations will be confirmed directly by the hotel along with instructions for deposits to guaran- tee the reservation Guarantees may be required to hold reserva- tions past a certain time Do not send guarantees with this form Guarantee reservations directly with the hotel after receiving con- firmation of your reservation by mailing a deposit check as in- structed by the hotel directly to the hotel, or guarantee by credit card Changes and cancellations should be made, preferably in writing, di- rectly to the Housing Bureau, prior to Friday, September 18, changes or cancellations after September 18 should be made directly to the hotel All reservations must be received by the League of California Cities Housing Bureau, P O Box 5612, San Francisco, CA 94101 no later than Friday, September 4, 1987 Please no reservations by phone. Ques- tions concerning Hotel reservations should be duccred to the Housing Bureau at 415-974-6900 TRAVEL By Air: The conference hotels are located in cllywntown ;)'i1n Frail cisco, 13 miles north of the San Francisco lntea riuunal Airport (SFO), 20 nulus frorn Oakland Inter- national Airport Airporter Bus Air- port bus transportation is available every 15 minutes between San Francisco International Airport and the downtown Airporter Terminal at 301 Ellis (at Taylor) Wait curbside outside baggage claims area for sil- ver Airporter Bus with orange and blue stripes Pay driver $6 one way or $11 round trip Reservations not necessary, for information, call 415-495-8404 Super Shuttle Door - to -Door Van Service from SFO (no reservations required, call 871-7800 upon arrival at SFO), from hotels to SFO reservations are recom- mended Wait for blue van with gold letters Pay driver $7 one-way, maximum of 3 stops per trip For in- formation, call 415 - 558-8500 Taxi: Costs about $21 to downtown. League Travel Agency/Dis- count Fares: Information on air- line schedules, reservations, and ticketing service is available through Mutual Benefit Travel Association (MBTA) in Sacramento, 916 - 929-4488 or 800 - 223-6282 Discount air fares are available for the Annual Conference AirCal/ American Airlines is offering 50% off coach fare, with an additional discount off excursion fare, request special fare code "SUN012 " PSA is also offering discount air fares request the League's "Smile Number M1239C " These fares may be obtained through MBTA, your local travel agent, or directly from the airlines HOTEL NOTE. Transient occupancy tax Is 11% Numbers key to reap Single Dbl/Twln Suite 1. Hilton & Tower 415 - 771-1400 333 O'Farrell Street (at Mason) A full service convention hotel, walklnq distance to Moscone Center, theaters, and Union Square. Limited parking Standard $ 84-94 $ 98-108 $265-up Superior $104-114 $118-128 Deluxe $124 $138 2. Ramada Renaissance 415-392-8000 55 Cyril Magnin (Eddy at Market) Full service luxury hotel; limited parking. Standard $107-115 $115-125 $160-885 Business Class $135 $135 Renaissance Club $155 $170 3. Westin St. Francis 415-397-7000 Union Square (Powell at Geary) Five diamond, full service hotel on Union Square. Valet parking Main Building Standard $110 $130 Medium $120 $140 Deluxe $140 $160 Tower Medium $130 $150 Deluxe $150 $170 4. Bedford Hotel 415-673-6040 761 Post Street (at Jones) Charming hotel with an English country spirit; min- utes from the Financial district and Union Square. $ 79 $ 79 5. Californian 415-885-2500 405 Taylor Street (at O'Farrell) European style hotel in the heart of San Francisco; sunny spacious rooms. Limited parking. $ 58 $ 58 $100-135 6. Cartwright Hotel 415 - 421-2865 524 Sutler Street (at Powell) A rare combination of location, charm and value; each room distinctively furnished with antiques. $ 68 $ 78 7. Diva Hotel 415-885-0200 440 Geary Street (at Mason) A modern Italian classic, just off Union Square, com- plimentary continental breakfast. Valet parking. $ 95 $ 95 $105-275 8. Four Seasons Clift 415-775-4700 495 Geary Street (at Taylor) Mobil Five Star, AAA Five Diamond hotel, spacious guest rooms. Valet parking. Moderate $140 $160 $375-475 Superior $150 $170 Deluxe $170 $185 Four Seasons $180 $200 9. Handlery Hotel 415 - 986-2526 351 O'Farrell Street (at Powell) Just off Union Square; complimentary parking & 1 11,.,s1 I Numbers key to map Single Dbl/Twin Suite newspaper full service restaurant, outdoor heated 5wlrnrninq pool .91 $ 97 $109 10 Holiday Inn Union Square 415-398-8900 480 Sutter Street (at Powell) Reslauranl and pub, 301h Iloor cocklid lounge on cable car line. Valet parking. $108-126 $128-146 $275 11. Hyatt on Union Square 415-398-1234 345 Stockton Street (at Post) On Union Square amidst shops, restaurants, theaters, cable cars 1 block and Moscone Center only 3 blocks away Limited parking. Standard $127 $154 $275-850 Superior $142 $169 Deluxe $157 $184 12. Kensington Park Hotel 415-788-6400 450 Post Street (at Powell) A small 80-room hotel just off Union Square, compli- mentary continental breakfast. Valet parking $ 98 $ 98 $140 13. King George Hotel 415-781-5050 334 Mason Street (at Geary) Newly renovated, European style, full service hotel, restaurants and parking available. $ 65 $ 69 $ 90-120 14. Mark Twain 415 - 673-2332 345 Taylor Street (at Ellis) Centrally located near Union Square and cable cars, restaurants and lounge. $ 52 $ 64 $127-147 15. Meridien 415-974-6400 50 Third Street (at Market) Deluxe full service hotel overlooking Moscone Con- Nne St sww St : K :... P.m SI cu,y Si oTmal Si 14 s_SI: 4t.'(.;�, a+� A 'r�.'..fii��w 'P ai't•.. ..:. Elh mar s,;. Gowen cam A.S�eN:.,�,r'e :s►... •..::,��' ». ... MCAlli:ln 51 ... - ." .`C is •. ��. .71 . �. Numbers key !o map Single Db;/Tw1n Suite 16 Nikku rui- 1l' Mason \ 0 i.ulrl An,!" '„o•,r ,44• 'Ic,ll;P dilb .:onrlr 0C ,Ind rYen;!NC n`v1'!:. L ;m!cd par'r.!nV $107 $11-, 17 Raphael Hotel air 986 2000 386 Geary Slreel(a! Masco) Small eleganl hotel ,n Ihealer and hoppl^g area, moderate price, warm almospnere Llmlfed parking $ 76 $ 89 18 Sheraton Palace 415-392-8600 2 New Montgomery (at Market) A classic" full service holei 3 restaurants and park- ing available $ 92 $107 $225-350 .319 Sir Francis Drake 415-392-7755 450 Powell Street (at Sutler) Full service lmdihonal San Frinl.i:,;,o hole! sl Umon Square Limited parking $ 92 $112 20. Stewart Hotel 415-781-7800 351 Geary'Street (at Powell) Union Square location newly renevaieo rooms, nark- ing, lull service restaurant and outdoor heated swlr;- ming pool $ 71 $ 83 21. Union Square 415-397-3000 114 Powell Street (al Ellis) A small, European hotel at Uniu Square on cable car line. complimentary continental breakfast Limited parking $ 72 $ 72 $115-280 1 6 10 t 1 + t 12 19 11 3 Union 7 T7 Square t8\ 13 20 9 1 16 21 F 15 :. 2'o \ tfoscoy°��o o� / C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. S T A F F R E P O R T COUNCIL ITEM (') MEETING DATE: 8/27/87 4w SUBJECT: APPOINT CITY MANAGER AS CITY CLERK FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Staff is currently in the process of reorganizing the City Clerk's Department. Part of the reorganization involves not filling the City Clerk's position. It is the opinion of Staff that the duties and responsibilities of the Clerk's Department can be handled by the current staff primarily the Deputy City Clerk. tv Many sections of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code refer directly to the title of City Clerk and the City Attorney advises that someone be designated officially City Clerk. Staff is recommending that the Council appoint the City Manager as the City Clerk. STAFF RECOMMENDS: COUNCIL P N HE CITY MANAGER AS THE OFFICIAL CITY CLERK. TS:lc -0 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM i 3F DATE: August 20, 1987 S T A F F R E P O R T (1W CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: August 27, 1987 SUBJECT: REJECTION OF LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC 87-01A FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X The City of Grand Terrace has received a letter from Mr. Gary Lawson requesting a refund of planning fees paid on the 37-unit apartment complex proposed for the east side of Grand Terrace Road, north of 4, Barton Road. This is the second claim signed by Mr. Lawson. At the meeting of February 26, 1987 he requested, not only the refund fees, but engineering and design costs, loss of potential profit and other expenses in the amount of $208,190.71. The Council normally would reject a claim and refer it to our claims administrator. This type of claim, however, is not covered under our memorandum of coverage and, therefore, is not handled by our claims administrator. Mr. Lawson makes reference to another individual that had applied to have his project reviewed by the Planning Commission and, as result of the moratorium, withdrew his request and was returned his check for the planning fees. The difference between that case and this one is that Mr. Lawson's project went completely through the Planning Commission Public Hearing process, received approval by the Planning Commission and then was turned down subsequently by the Council in an appeal made by the neighbori;ig citizens. This request is for $6,261 in fees. He is, however, proposing a compromise and is willing to accept $3,000. It is the recommendation of staff and the City Attorney that this request be denied and Council direct the Deputy City Clerk to notify the claimant of Lhe action taken. STAFF RECOMMENDS: TO REJECT MR LAWSON'S CLAIM GTLC 87-OIA AND DIRECT THE DEPUTY CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY THE CLAIMANT OF THE ;,CiION TAKEN. TS:bt CDUACIC AGENbA ITEM V 3 8 or 0-( 7/31/87 City Council City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, CA 9232LP-5295 Dear Council Members; i have paid the city of Grand Terrace .;f6,261 in fees for a 37-unit development on the east side of Grand Terrace Road_. These fees were paid .in good faith by me and accepted in good faith by the city that the project I was proposing was in conformance with all rules, regulations and zoning laws applicable at the time. Now that you are changing the zoning my project no longer fits the zoning, so I request a return of my fee money.This was a grossly unfair act and probably, in view of a recent supreme court case, an illegal one. Your attorney, ;;ir. Ivan Hopkins, claims that I had a 'fair shot' at the deal. I disagree. I feel I got a raw deal and there was nothing "fair" about it! In view of the fact that iir. Ed -die :Logue got all of his money back and he was up to the planning commissio:l submission step for his 16-unit project, I feel you should refund at least a. portion if not all of my fees. Is it your policy to treat Grand Terrace residents, i.e. Mr. Hogue, differently than out of town residents? I thought we were all equal before the laws and regulations of a government, but apparently your city dis- criminates against outsiders. Since your engineering and planning staff did do work on my pro- ject I will accept only 4?3,000 of the :;�6,261 in fees I have paid the city. If this compromise is unacceptable I have one more month left on my time in which to file a legal suit for my original claim of :1�208,190.71. 'vie Ill then let a. judge or your insurance carrier decide who's right. Please send the check to the address listed below. sincerely, Gary .Lawson 18180 Levonwood_ Circle ountain Valley, CA 92708 hone ( 711.E) 968-6473 s' STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: _ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT Forest City Grand Terrace Development (Mt. Vernon) 11 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Attached for the consideration and acceptance by the City Council are the following documents as submitted by Forest City Grand Terrace in conjunction with the development located on Mt. Vernon Avenue northerly of Barton Road: 1. An Easement for Sanitary Sewers across subject property 2. An Easement for 11' of additional dedication on Mt. Vernon Avenue 3. Subdivision Guarantee for Monument Setting (a check in the amount of $3,000) 4. Streets and Storm Drain Agreement 5. Water System Agreement 6. Landscaping Agreement 7. Sanitary Sewer System Agreement 8. Grading Permit Bond $ 30,000.00 9. Streets and Storm Drain Bond 300,000.00 (performance) 10. Streets and Storm Drain Bond 150,000.00 (labor and material) 11. A Bond for Water System Improvements 130,000.00 (performance) 12. A Bond for Water System Improvements 65,000.00 (labor and material) 13. Bond for Installation of Sanitary Sewers 3,800.00 (performance) COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM a J 14 STAFF REPORT August 20, 1987 Page Two 14. A Bond for Sanitary Sewers $ 1,900.00 (labor and material) 15. Bond for Landscaping 10,000.00 4, (performance) STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1. ACCEPT ALL OF THE FEES AND BONDS 2. APPROVE ALL OF THE AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENTS 3. ACCEPT THE EASEMENTS AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD SAID EASEMENTS JK:wl Attachments Order No Escrow No Loan No WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDLR S LISE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ ........................................... Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed, OR Computed on the consideration or value less Dens or encumbrance, remaining at time of sale. Signature of Declarant or Agent detenn-ing tox I r- fa.0 r CORPORATION GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, FOREST CITY DILLON, INC. corporation or(-;uuted under the laws of the State of 0H10 , does ht,wi)\ GRANT to THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES. the real property in the City of GRAND TERRACE County of SAN BERNARDINO Dated.__ July 23, 1987 STATE OF aAlX1,'fQ9 YA OH IO COUNTY OF CUY,AHOGA SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT "EXHIBIT A" State of Cahfornia, desc;ribeci ,,> FORESL..�LL.D1L '.N-,._ T�I > an Ohi CorpOr 10n ByOn July 23, 1987 hefore me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared - -- - -- - -- - - -- - BY t _ ``` i Al an S El l ett S mown to me to be the _---_ __ __--._.—.._ President, and .. -------__---- known to me to be the Assistant - -- Secretary of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. MARY LOUISI- URAY WITNESS my hand and official sea � Notary Public, Slate nl Ohm, ht:ya (:I) �,M—y Commission Expires Dec. 12, 19?/ (phis area for offic,al notena' ae,i:` EXHIBIT "A" Portions of Lot 4 and 5, Block "E", Map of Resubdivision of Grand Terrace Tract, per map recorded in Book 1, Page 33 of Records of Survey, in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follm.,s: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 4, said Southeast corner being the center line of Mt. Vernon Avenue; Thence along said centerline of Mt. Vernon Avenue, North 00' 11' 44'' East, a distance of 12.60 feet; Thence North 89' 48' 16" West, a distance of 33 feet to an intersection with the !-Jest line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing North 890 48' 16" West a distance of 11.00 feet to an intersection with a line that is parallel with and 44.00 feet West of said center line of Mt. Vernon Avenue; Thence along said parallel line, North 00' 11' 44'' East, a distance of 245.40 feet to a point on the South line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the County of San Bernardino by Deed recorded June 24, 1964, in Book 6176, Page 703 of Official Records of said County. Thence South 890 48' 16" East a distance of 11.00 feet along said South line to an intersection with the aforesaid West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue; Thence along said West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue, South 000 11' 44" 'Jest, a distance of 245.40 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 0.06 Acres. LEGEtJD 5CALE i "- ZOO' P�CPCS� `^,�IDENIt��C� STREET WIDENING PLAT C.U.P. 65-05 MT VERNON AVENUE WE5Ti SLY E,lCIE CITY OF GRAND TERKACE , CA RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW, MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO - NAME STIIECT ADDRESS CITY, STATE I ZIIE l_ -Itic Ordcr No... J Escrow No ... .... ....... Grant Deed This space for Recorder's use THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is S ❑ unincorporated area x2 City of Grand Terrace Parcel No U computed on full value of property conveyed, or ❑ computed on full value less value of hens or encumbrances remaining at erne of sale, and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ForUSL CLty Dillon, Inc., an Ohio Corporation hereby CRANT(S) to The City of Grand Terrace the following described real property in the City of Grand Terrace count} of San Bernardino state of California: an EASIT'1QT for SBAERS over, tinder, and across. "(l-at portion of Lot 5 of Block E, GRAND TERRACE, as shown on the map recorded in Bool< 1 ] of %ps, liaoe +, Records of said County, described as follows: A strip of land 15 feet in width, the centerline thereof being 7.5 feet southerly from the following described lane: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of Mt. Vernon Avenue, as the t"ir. now ex-tsts, .nth LJie northerly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Verda M. Price by Deed recorded `rarch 16, 1955 in Book 3593, page 508 of Official Records of said County; thence westerly along said northerly lane a distance of. 480 feet, more or less, to the easterly line of Gage Canal as said Cage Canal is shown on Record of Survey recorded in Book 7 of Records of Survey, pages 83 through 92, Records of -�u11 �`OlInL1'� mid strip to Le bounded on the east by said westerly line of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Lu (M ilia west by said easterly line of Gage Canal. The above described easement is for the construction, installation, maintenance, replacement and rem)va.1 of a saaiii-tary sewer system, said easemenL to continue in full force and effect so lone; as attd s tt t syst m ,s operated and maintained upon the above described property. '11-ie herein granted shall also include the right to use, during the consLructi.on pe rl.�x1, :>uch areas adjacent to the easement as may be reasonably necessary for the performance of the work and for access to the work during any necessary repair work. Property owner to remove and replace carports as required for access at its own expense. j STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTI' OF SS On this day of _ , In the year before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory c,idencc) to he the person _--------- .---.----_._.---- whose name subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that _ executed the same Signature Name (Typed or Printed) Notary Public in and for said County and State FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWING LINE; IF NO PARTY SO SHOWN, MAIL AS DIRECTED ABOVE -- - Narnc Strcct Address 1 101 wire PmNtCD City & St is - , M-p-zoe (REV 2/82) BOND No. • K03 3 14 145 PEnmrr No. 08-87-6-DD-0398 Foi-PgnnPRINCIPnI 08 -- S8D — 215 — 1.78 Inc. LOCATION — EFFECTIVE DATE July 28, 1987 D16T CO FIT Premium: $50.00 BOND [Highway Encroachment Permit] Know A11 ,lien by These Presents: WHEREAS, The hereinafter named principal has made or will make application to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAMN, of the State of California, for the issuance of a permit_, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 3, Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code, as amended, for construction of the following described improvements. To connect into the existing 48 inch diameter C.M.P. crossing under Newport Avenue with a proposed 39 inch diameter R.C.P. storm drain lateral via the construction of a manhole structure. and WHEREAS, said applicant may apply for and said Department of Transportation, of the State of California, may grant a renewal of said permit, and WHEREns, said Department of Transportation, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has determined and required that said applicant shall file a bond to the people of the State of California conditioned for the proper compliance with the requirements of said legislative act and the regulations thereunder of said Department of Transportation, and precedent to the takin effect of such permit In the penal sum of Three Thousand and Five Hundred 3,50d�00 Dollars ($ Now, TxEnFvonE, The undersigned principal and__ Insurance Company of North America Honorable City Council City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, Calif. 92324 60 Gentlemen: SUBDIVISION GUARANTEEING PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) Grand Terrace, California Date 8-10-87 Pursuant to Chapter 3, Title 6 of the County Code and Ordinance No. 1 of the C.it) Council, the undersigned hereby agrees that all final monuments as required for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase 1, as described in attached exlubit Aare to be set .in„ furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before 12/l/89 The undersigned also agrees to furnish the notes thereon as required by County Code, Chapter 3, Title 6 and Ordinance No. 1 of the City Council, and to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66495 of the Subdivision Map Act. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $ 3,000.00 as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will be set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned. it It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Grand Terrace is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed, and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City Manager is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit of the proper City Fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66495 and 66496 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Grand Terrace specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirement. ZGrand yours, Subdivider Terrace, aCalifornia Limited Partnershic 11601 Wilshire B1. rfflMdress Los Angeles, CA 90025 Date 8-10-87 The depositor of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be FC Grand Terrace 11601 Wilshire #1900 L. A. CA, 90025 , address. To be signed by party releasing his rights to the cash deposit 3,U)j is hereby acknowledged on from FC Grand Terrace City Manager/Clerk JIM Note: To be submitted fully filled out and signed. Original: To City Council Signed Copy: To Subdivider Signed Copy: To City Manager/Clerk Receipt of Deposit Permit No. Bond Number: K0331�13 GRADING PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (Permittee) as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 30,000.00), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The conditions of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has filed or ( ) is about to file with the City of Grand Terrace an application for a permit to perform excavation or fill work, or both, more specifically described in the application for the Grading Permit, upon real property owned by said Principal known as FC Grand Terrace NOW THEREFORE, if the above named Principal shall well and truly comply with all the requirements of said Agreement, and if all of the work required to be done complies with all of the terms and conditions of the Grading Permit for excavation or fill or both to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and is completed within the time limit specified in said Grading Permit, then this obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Permit or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the grading plans attached to said Permit shall in any wise affect the obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Permit or to the work or improvements or to the plans. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, i_ncl.udi_ng a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS THIS 7th DAY OF August i'(; C;r•ind Terrace, a California Limited Principal Partnership Principal Insurance Company of North \mcl-1 .I Surety, By:— Carol Ganapol, Attorney -in -Fact r. NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. STREETS AND STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this loth day of August 198,, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, hereinafter called "City" and FC Grand Terrace hereinafter called "Owner". WITNESSETH FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication (if any) in Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A hereby agrees at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner all work and improvements, in said Specific Plan, according to Plans and Profiles approved and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, Profiles, Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by the City Council. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 300,000.00). SECOND: The City, the City Engineer and all offdcers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the wort: or any part thereof; for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for the injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by him; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property of the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City, the City Engineer and all officers and employees of the City from all suits, or actions of every name, kind, or description brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed that said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said Council, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective'or dangerous condition existent on said rights -of -way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. That it is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, and proposed, and proposed road rights -of -way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Street System and said Owner may, with approval of the City Engineer, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. And the Owner hereby agrees to pa" for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State or Federal Go.ernment, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument - shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Streets and Storm Drain Agreement Page Two Said bonds shall be in the amounts and for the following purposes: (a) an amount equal to the total estimated cost of the improvement, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the Agreement, and (b) an additional amount equal to one-half the total estimated cost of the improvement securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them for the improvements. Should the sureties on said bond, or either of them become insufficient, said Owner agrees to renew bond with good and sufficient sureties, within ten days after receiving notice that said sureties are insufficient. Bonds as herein required shall remain in full force and effect until all work is completed and accepted by the City. SIXTH: It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, including the surety or sureties on the bonds attached to this Agreement, that in the event it is deemed necessary to extend the time of completion of the work contemplated to be done under this Agreement, said extension may be granted by the City Council and shall in no way affect the validity of this Agreement or release the surety or sureties on the bonds attached hereto. It is understood, 460 in the event of such extension of time of completion of the work required hereunder, that the City may re -estimate the value of uncompleted work based upon the current estimate unit prices and, if deemed necessary, to adjust bond amounts accordingly. ATTEST: City Clerk City of Grand Terrace CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BY: BY: MAYOR FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnersh NAME OF OWNER BY: FC Grand Terrace, Inc. General Partner BY: /_zmil Leven . Albert, Vice President 21 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Those portions of Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block "E" Resubdivision of Grand Terrace Tract in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California per map filed in Book 1 of record of Surveys, page 33, in the office of the County Recorder Office, San Bernardino County, described as follows: Beginning at --he Southeast corner of said Lot 4, said point being on the cen- terline of Mt. Vernon Avenue; thence North 00 degrees 11' 44" East, 12.60 feet on said centerline of Mt. Vernon; thence North 89 degrees 48' 16" i;est 44.00 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 89 degrees 48'16" West, 256.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 9448, per Map recorded in Book 103 of Parcel Maps, Pages 43-44, Records of said County; thence South 57 degrees 20' 24" West,267.64 feet on the Easterly line of said Parcel 2 to the Southeast corner of said Parcel 2; thence North 89 degrees 48'16" West, 575.92 feet on the South line of said Parcel 2 to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 2, said point being on the East line of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map 9448; thence North 00 degrees 09'56" East, 135.16 feet on said line to the Northeast corner of said Parcel 1; thence North 89 degrees 48'16" West, 149.96 feet on the NOrth line of said Parcel 1, to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 1, said point being on the Easterly lire of The Gage Canal Company right-of-way; thence on the said right-of-way line the following courses, North 29 degrees 45'29" East, 94.11 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 275.00 feet; thence along said curve, to the right, through a central angle of 21 degrees 12'13" an arc distance of 101.77 feet to the end thereof; thence Norht 50 degrees 57'42" East, 135.93 feet to a point on the South line of Parcel "A" of lot line adjustment Recorded November 6, 1986 as Instrument No. 86-330665, Official Records; thence on the South line of said Parcel "A", South 89 degrees 49'16" East, 291.76 feet; thence on the East line of said Parcel "A", North Ol degrees 00'12" East, 240.36 feet, to a point on the Easterly line of the Gage Canal Company right-of-way; thence on said right-of-way, North 51 degrees 17'21" East, 453.66 feet to a point, said point being the NOrhtwest cor-:er of the land described in the deed to Forest City Dillon, Inc. recorded September 3, 1986, as Instrument Number 86-252349 of Official Records; thence South 89 degrees 22'16" EAst, 352.63 feet on the North line of said land to a point in the ',;est line of :,t. Vernon Avenue, 33' half width, aid point also being the. `;orcheast corner of the afresaid land described i:- --he deed to Forest City Dillon, Inc.; thence South 00 degrees 11'44" West, .25.28 feet on the1 ;4est line of ,;t Vernon .venue to the beginni::5 of a non-t:;;;ent curve, concave. to the East, havin.; a radius of 994.00 feet said point "t_.n.g on the Westerly right -of -,way of 'It. Vernon Avenue 44.00 feet half width, per Deed Recorded June 24, 1964 in Book 6170, Page 703 Official Records; che;:ce Southerly along said curve, to the left, through a central angle of 08 degrees 31'55" an arc distance of 148 02 feet to the end thereof; thence South 00 degrees 11'44" West, 485.05 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGI,;KING. 1iond Numht, r I'I U111 m: i 11� l bond MATERIAL AND LABOR. BOND Road KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (Owners) as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 150,000.00), lawful monev of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bond ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, dointlti rind severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal. (=,) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Aoreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map ACt of the State of California, for the improvement of the streets and easements for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A or to be improved in connection with said Specific Plan and whereas this Bond is required by said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to an amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies, and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all cost incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 7th day of August 19 87 FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Principal i'rincipal NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by must be attached to Agreement, Plans, Insurance Company of North America Surety 13v i 117 Attorney -in -fact Carol Ganapol Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond and Specifications. Bond Number: 1\03i12il' Premium: $0,/180.00 29 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION Road KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE FC Grand Terrace, A California Limited Partnership (Owners) as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000.00), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the improvement of the streets and easements for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A or to be improved in connection with said Specific Plan and whereas this Bond is required by said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on ;tG part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed there under or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 7th day of August 1987 FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Insurance Company of North Amcri,:,i Principal Bv : rincipal Surety C By: 76 Attorney —in —fact Carol Ganapol NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must he itt-acho(i. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans, and Specifications. WATER SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this August , 19 81 by and between the CITY OF GRAND California, hereinafter called "CITY" and 1C Grand Terrace called "Owner." 10th day of TERRACE, State of hereinafter WITNESSETH: Irw FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by t.hc City Council of the public rights -or -way offered for dedication in (if any) in Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in exhibit A attached hereby a rep'; nt i t own cost and expen ,e, to furn.Lsh ill cqu:i pment , Libor, ,Intl material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof:, to perform and complete in a good and workmanline manner a water system in said Specific Plan, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the office of Riverside Highland Water Company are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said Riverside Highland Water Company, and shall not be deemed complete until. approved and accepted as completed by the Riverside Highland Water Company. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 130,000.00). SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for the injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City and all of.fLcers and employees of the City, from all suits or actions of every name, kind or description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said City, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective or dangerous condition existent on said rights -of -way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. :That is is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, any proposed road rights -of -way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Road System and said Owner may, with approval of the proper City representatives, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. The Owner hereby agrees to pay for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIF7I3: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial 7nf7titutions subject to regulation by the State or federal CovernnlOnt, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Bond Number: h0331_"409 Premium: $2,808.00 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION Water KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnershi Owners as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are hc1d and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 130,000.00), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The conditions of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with' Plans and Specifications for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 7th day of August 19 87 FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Insurance Company of North America Princi al y Surety By By:.. rincipal Attorney -in -fact,'/ Carol Ganapol NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. A Bond Number: K03312409 Premium: included in pei 101-W,111� bond MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Water THAT ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (Owners) as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of SIXTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 65,000.00), lawful money of the United States for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to an amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies, and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this iC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Principal / 1'y : � 'Principal 7th day of August 1987 Insurance Company of North America Surety Attorney -in -fact / Carol Ganapol NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. LANDSCAPING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this loth day of August, 1987 ,�. and between the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, hereinafter called "City" and FC Grand Terrace hereinafter called "Owner". WTTNFCCRTP FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council or the public rights -of -way offered for dedication (if any) in Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A hereby agrees at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and to complete in a good and workmanlike manner all landscaping and installation of irrigation system in said Tract, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the Planning Director are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted by the City Council. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 10,000.00). SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for any injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City and all officers and employees of the City from all suits or actions of every name, kind of description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor, or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by the City, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective or dangerous condition existent on said rights -of -way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. That it is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, or proposed road rights -of -way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Road System and said Owner may, with approval of the proper City representatives, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. The Owner hereby agrees to pay for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish one good and sufficient bond in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State of Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Bond Number: K0 i it')6!i ' Premium: $216.00 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION Landscaping KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (Owners) as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound into the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 10,000.00), lawful money the e United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, g ointly bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 7th day of Auzust. , 1987. FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Principal Bv: ✓ rincipal Insurance Company of North America y Surety / B y : i Attorney -in -fact Carol Ganapol NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Rnnd m„ct he attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this loth day of August _ 19 87, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, hereinafter called "CITY' and FC Grand Terrace hereinafter called. "Owner." taw WITNESSETH: FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council of the dedications offered (if any) in Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase C, us desz:ribed in attached exhibit A hereby agrees at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner a sanitary sewer system, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Engineer -are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted by the City Council. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($ 3,800.00). SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City, shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any lossior damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for any injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City, and all officers and employees of the City, from all suits or actions of every name, kind of description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed that said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the dedications offered on such Final Map of said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said Council give good and adequate warning of each and every dangerous condition caused by the construction of said improvements, and will protect the travelling public therefrom. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State or Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Bond Number: K03312380 Premium: $82.00 BOND FOR IMPROVE1,1ENT OF SUBDIVISION Sanitary Sewers KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: TIiAT LJE, FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership (Owners) tow �s Pra.,,cipal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, and firmly bound unto the City of Grand 'terrace, State of California, a,n t-he eld just and full sum of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($ 3,800.00), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, %,e bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and jol-ntl.y and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the SW Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a sanitary sewer system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in exhibit A attached as approved and on file with said City in connection with the exectuion of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. :and the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to �-hc- wo;-I; or improvements or to the Plans or SpecI.fi.cations. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. ;FITNESS OUR HANDS this rC Grand Terrace, a California I ii:;! LL-d ?drtnershio Princi 1 rincipal 7th day of August 19 87 Insurance Company of North America Surety B ( ( -6 Attorney—i-n—fact Carol Ganapol Note: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. Bond Number: h03312380 Premium: included in performance bond MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Sanitary Sewers KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnershi ers as Principal, and Insurance Company of North America (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, lawful the just and full sum of ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($ 1 money of the United States for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal (x) has entered into or ( ) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a sanitary sewer system and all appurtenances thereto, in -accordance with Plans and Specifications for Specific Plan No. 85-8, Phase I, as described in attached exhibit A as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to any amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations ' entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies. and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the worl: or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 7th day of August , 19 8J FC Grand Terrace, a California Limited Partnership Principal. / I;y : ✓ rincipal VOTE: Acknowledgments of execution Bonds must be attached to Agreement, Insurance Company of north America Surety, / Attorney-. n-Cact Carol Ganapol by Principals and Surety must be ate..�chei. Plans and Specifications. AUG 2 7 i987 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES CI 0i i;iiri�`;% 15 JUNE 1987 I The meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm by E. Luers. Members present: E. Hodder V. Pfenneghausen E. Luers M. Harris Minutes of the 20 May 1987 meeting were presented and approved as corrected. LIAISON REPORT Council liaison was not present. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Communications: 1. V. Pfennighausen reported that damage has been sustained by the high frequency antenna mast. He will give an assessment of that damage at the July meeting. Emergency Operations Plan: 1. E. Luers reported that review of the base plan in accordance with county/state guidelines is complete. There are some areas that have not been addressed in our plan and he will provide a list of those for discussion at the July regular meeting. Building 3 Enhancements: 1. No report. Internal Procedures: 1. Standard Operating Procedure #1 was received from staff and is ready for publication. 2. Procedure #2 was distributed and comments are due from all members at the next regular meeting. (Action Item #87-20) Q%MIL AGENDA ITEM 5�� ACTION ITEM STATUS AI #87-10 E. Luers received the Lafferty and Associates pamphlets. The cost would be $1.06 if 5000 would be purchased. J. Hodder will contact R. Anstine and ask him to provide a list of contacts for other committees in the surrounding area so that ow we might combine an order and bring the price down to that level or below. Closed. See Action Item #87-21. OLD BUSINESS 1. J. Hodder reported that per R. Anstine the budget for FY 88 has been approved by the City Council. As submitted. 2. E. Hodder reported that staff's research into committee guidelines indicates that elections are to be held every other year on the even year. 1. J. Hodder reported that a call to Dr. J. Tibbles' residence revealed that he has moved out of the community. He will generate a request for action to have the vacancy advertised and filled. (Action Item #87-22) 2. It was suggested that since the storage container needs - painting, that the color be chosen so that it blends with the rest of the surrounding environment. J. Hodder will write an IOM to R. Anstine and request that the inside be painted gloss white and that the outside be made to match the buildings. In addition, the hinges need oil. (Action Item #87-23) 3. M. Harris moved that the regular meeting night be changed to the third Monday of every month. Seconded by V. Pfennighausen, and passed unanimously. This will begin with the August 1987 meeting. J. Hodder will notify the Chamber Newsletter. (Action Item #87-24. 4. The question was raised as to how many copies of the procedures manual would be kept so that we know how many copies of the new procedures will have to be made. E. Hodder will find out from R. Anstine. (Action Item #87-25) ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. The next regular meeting will be on 15 July in building 3 at. 7 00 pm. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:26 pm. Cubme by: z Y--- Eileen F. Hodder, Secretary Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee IM 3 Approved by: Tames A. Hodder, Chairman Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee M CITY OF GRAND TERRACE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM LIST (July 1987 Update) #86-4 ASSIGNED TO. J. Hodder ON: 9/17/86 DUE: 10/15/86 CLOSED: 06/15/87 ACTION: Provide draft of Family Emergency Preparedness Pamphlet for committee review. CLOSURE: Rough draft submitted. Note: New, similar document now available. Further analysis required. #87-07 ASSIGNED TO: J. Hodder ON: 01/21/87 DUE: 02/18/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Invite R. Bailes from the Sheriff's Dept. to provide information on the new Emergency Prepared- 060 Officer responsibilities, levied on the Crime Prevention Officers. CLOSURE: R. Bailes unable to make meeting. Closure to await future visit. #87-10 ASSIGNED TO: E. Luers ON: 02/18/87 DUE: 03/18/87 CLOSED: 05/20/87 ACTION: Contact Lafferty and Associates and find out the price of pamphlets similar to the Edison family preparedness publication. CLOSURE: Brochure of all services and prices will be sent. #87-11 ASSIGNED TO: R. Anstine ON: 02/18/87 DUE: 03/18/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Contact tent frame manufacturer and find out if a frame can be expedited for committee evaluation. CLOSURE Mr. Santini is currently out of town. Drawings are available. A #87-12 ASSIGNED TO: R. Anstine ON: 02/18/87 DUE: 03/18/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Discuss acquisition of city-wide alarm system with the new city manager. CLOSURE: #87-16 ASSIGNED TO: E. Luers ON: 03/18/87 DUE: 04/18/87 CLOSED: 06/15/87 ACTION: Review EOP using check list provided by EOS. Provide assessment at the April 1987 meeting. CLOSURE: Review complete. List of deficiencies will be discussed at the July regular meeting. #87-17 ASSIGNED TO: J. Hodder ON: 03/18/87 DUE: 04/18/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Prepare a cover letter to accompany copies of the EOP which will be sent to S. B. County Disaster Prepared- ness and Red Cross officials. CLOSURE: #87-20 ASSIGNED TO: All ON: 06/15/87 DUE: 07/15/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Review EOC SOP 10-002 CLOSURE: 487-21 ASSIGNED TO: R. Anstine ON: 06/15/87 DUE: 07/15/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Provide list of Emergency Operations Committee contacts for surrounding communities. CLOSURE: ------------------------------------------------------------ #87-22 ASSIGNED TO: J. Hodder ON: 06/15/87 DUE• 07/15/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Write request for action to City Council to fill vacancy caused by J. Tibbles moving out of the community. CLOSURE: #87-23 ASSIGNED TO: J. Hodder ON: 06/15/87 DUE: 07/15/87 4 CLOSED: ACTION: Write IOM to R. Anstine asking if his crew can paint interior and exterior of the storage container. CLOSURE: #87-24 ASSIGNED TO: J. Hodder ON: 06/15/87 DUE: 07/15/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Notify Chamber Newsletter that this committee's regular meeting night will be the third Monday of each month beginning in August 1987. CLOSURE: #87-25 ASSIGNED TO: E. Hodder ON: 06/15/87 DUE: 07/15/87 CLOSED: ACTION: Talk to R. Anstine and ask how many of the committee's procedure manuals staff will be keeping so we know how many copies of procedures to have made. CLOSURE: COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 8/27/87 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C JECT: CHANGE OF REGULAR MEETING DAY PROBLEM: Facts: Personal conflicts with several Committee members are making it difficult for them to attend regular meetings on the third Wednesday of the month. Im ALTERNATIVES: Change regular meeting night. DATE: 8/20/87 SOLUTION: Change the regular meeting night from the third Wednesday to the third Monday of each month. This night was approved by the Committee at the June 17 meeting. REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: Record and document where applicable that the Emergency Operations committee regular meetings are now held on the third Monday of each month until further notice. WUNCIE AGENDA ITEM ! S;q(/)(a) AUG i, < <_ t CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MONDAY, JULY 6, 1987 RECE1V_-U kAc Ralph Buchwalter, committee chairman, called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m. There were no minutes from the last meeting to be reviewed. And the treasurer had no report. Ralph, the committee chairman, reported that the Grand Terrace City Counsil reversed their previous decision and extended the Crime Prevention Officer's position for one (1) year longer. He also stated the Crime Preven- tion Committee needs to try to find more volunteers. The chairman of Crime Busters, Jamie Butler had no report. She did however, request ideas from the Committee on how the Crime Busters could fund raise due to the large number of members age 10 and under. Several suggestions were given by the Committee such as donations from the Lions Club, Southland Corp./Cheif Auto Parts, Stater Bros., Mc Donalds, Carls Jr. and the Chamber of Commerce etc. The Crime Prevention Officer, Sharon Korgan reported that her office had now been relocated up -stairs in the City Hall building. Sharon requested that the committee assign her monies to purchase an answering machine for �,aer office so that she could be reached at all times and would not miss anyones call. A motion was made that the committee alot $150.00 or less for the answering machine purchase. The motion was second and carried with all I's. Sharon requested that a business slide program for Grand Terrace be purchased. A motion was made to fund up to 50% of the purchase, not to exceed $75.00, and the Crime Prevention Officer to raise the rest through donations. The motion was second and carried with all I's. The Crime Prevention Officer asked that the Committee consider sending her to the Environmental Design Training Class in August. This is a week long training coarse. There was a motion made that Sharon reserve a spot in the class and make the required deposit pending the committee's approval of the cost and items to be presented by Sharon at the Committees Next meeting. Sharon reported that the community is really starting to respond by making more phone calls to her to report suspecious happening in our community She was also able to help a child abuse victum through her many resources. Sharon also reported that the Citizens Patrol will be starting as soon as possible. She is trying to get a car, insurance and maintainance fee donated. She is waiting for an R.S.V.P from Arp. There was a motion made that the Crime Prevention Committee change their regular meeting date to the second Monday of every month at 6:00 p.m. The motion was second and carried with all I's. A brief letter of notice will be sent to the City Clerk per Ralph. COUNCIL AGENDA � Ir�'!4� There was a motion made to refund Ralph Buchwalter $16.60 for a rubber stamp purchased for the Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee. The motion was second and carried with all IIs. The meeting was adjourned. EM IM ### CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD J�• AUGUST 10, 1987 Ralph Buchwalter, Committee chairman, called the meeting to order 6:15 p.m. There was a motion made by Singley to accept the minutes as proposed for the July 6, 1987 meeting. The motion was second by Butler and carried with all I's. The treasurer, Jim Singley reported that the Crime Prevention Committee budget for the 87-88 term had been cut by $500.00 compared to last years budget figures. There was a motion made by Buchwalter to accept the application for membership submitted by Bea Gigandet to the Crime Prevention Committee. The motion was second by Singley and carried with all I's. Ralph stated the application will be presented to the City Council at their next meeting August 24, 1987 for approval. The Crime Prevention Committee chairman, Buchwalter reported that we do need more members in order to bring the Committee back up to the maximum number of members which is seven (7). However, in addition to those members we also need as many volunteers as possible to help us complete the various projects the Committee will be engaged in. The Crime Busters chairman, Butler reported that the Crime Busters will be going to the Lions Club Board meeting this month to request a donation. The Crime Prevention Officer, Sharon Korgan reported that she was unable to purchase the answering machine authorized by the Committee due to the fact that the telephone system at the City Hall requires a special type of answering machine. Randy is checking into what type of machine will work on the phone system and how much it would cost. Sharon reported that Barbara Conley the head of Parks and Recreation Committee called and asked that she appear at their meeting September 14, 1987. The committee is requesting the Crime Prevention Committee to work with them on a problem area. Ralph suggested that the Parks and Recreation Committee as well as others documentate the problem or occurance and submitt it in writing to the Crime Prevention Committee so that it can be recorded and acted upon. The Crime Prevention Officer reported that the Citizens Patrol manual has been completed and Harry Hatch is in the process of making it generic so that Grand Terrace may use the manual also. Sharon has been given the okay to find a car for the Citizens Patrol to use. She then will ask that the City of Grand Terrace pick up the maintenance fees and Arp or R.S.V.P. will provide the insurance. -COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM -0 SA (2) Sharon reported that at the next Crime Prevention Committee meeting she would like to start the planning of the Safety Fair. The Crime Prevention Officer reported that she gave a Domestic Violence Seminar at the Price Club for their employees two weeks ago and it was very sucessful. She has been asked to do another seminar to the group. There was a motion made by Buchwalter that we reconsider the sending the Crime Prevention Officer to the Evironmental Desgin Training Class at our next meeting due to the fact that the class has been postponed until later date) as reported by the Crime Prevention Officer. The motion was second by Singley and carried with all I's. There was a motion by Singley that the Committee provide up to and not to exceed $500.00 upon approval of the Committee, for the Crime Prevention Officer to attend the Santa Barbara C.C.P.O.A. Conference. And that a bill be submitted to the Sheriff's office for re-imbursement if possible. The motion was second by Butler and carried with all I's. There was a motion by Singley that the Crime Prevention Officer submitt to the Crime Prevention Committee a proposed annual program showing what the Crime Prevention Officer and the Committee will accomplish, including detailed goals for the 87-88 term. This program is to be presented to the Crime Prevention Committee at their next meeting. The motion was second by Wright and carried will all I's. The meeting was adjourned. COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 8/27/87 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: CRIME PREVENTION EJECT: CHANGE OF MEETING DATE DATE: 8/14/87 PROBLEM: Facts: At the Crime Prevention Committee meeting of July 6, 1987 the Committee voted to change their meeting date to the second (2nd) Monday of each month, at 6:00 p.m. The meeting is currently being held on -the first Monday of each month. ALTERNATIVES: SOLUTION: REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE CHANGE OF MEETING DATE AND THAT THIS BE IDENTIFIED BY PUBLIC NOTICE. COUNCH: AGENDA ITEM i 5A(ZA Date: August 10, 1987 To: Grand Terrace City Clerk From: Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee Ralph Buchwalter, Committee Chairman 4 RE: Crime Prevention Committee Meetings IM As of July 6, 1987 the Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee voted to change their meeting date to the Second (2nd) Monday of each month, at 6:00 p.m. Please be advised that the new meeting date will start immediately. i�[-G,i i,• _._ � /* AUG 2 7 1987 CITY•OF GRAND TERRACE PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 1987 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Barbara Conley, Lennie Frost, Louis Galvez, Dick Rollins ABSENT: Jason Otter, Chuck Percy, Ken Rinderhagen, 4 Dave Widor CITY STAFF PRESENT: Wendell Lake CALL TO ORDER: 7:35 PM by Chairman Conley ITEMS 1. Minutes of the July 6, 1987 meeting were reviewed and upon a motion by Louis Galvez and seconded by Lennie Frost approved by unanimous vote. 2. PICO PARK SITE --Randall Anstine informed this Committee of new developments in the Edison lease land proposal. Marygold Farms may have to be reimbursed if City takes physical possession of land 1-1-88 and the well needs an analysis to see if there is adequent water for City and Marygold Farms use. Based on these NEW developments, Louis Galvez made a motion to request Council to direct further efforts of this Committee. Seconded by Lennie Frost. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL 3. T.J.AUSTYN PARK SITE --It has been brought to the attention of this Committee that T.J.Austgn has resumed negotiations to develop the park. Further discussion at September meeting. q. PROPOSED PARK REPORT --Planning Director has requested, by September 1, 1987, a report consisting of suggested location, size, and ammenities to be forwarded to the Consultant for the General Plan update. REPORT SUBMITTED TO PLANNING DIRECTOR. S. GRIFFIN HOUSEHOLD SURUEY--Commissioners Frost and Conley surveyed 11 adjacent homeowner (3 were not home) for their reaction to a passive park for the Griffin site. Only 2 homeowners strongly rejected any developments. All homeowners accepted development provided certain considerations were dealt with. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. COUNCIL A 'G VENDA ITEm#4,3) 6. P & R SURVEY --Mendell Lake and Chairman Conley cooperatively completed a P & R Survey to be utilized bg this Committee to better serve the residents of this Community. Commissioner Rollins made the motion we request Council to approve cost of printing and sending survey. Lennie Frost seconded. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. 7. TOUR de TERRACE --Flyers will be distributed in 3 weeks. Spreen Honda is donating 2 pace cars. Mendell Lake and Commissioner Conley will be presenting to the area elementary schools the 1.3 mile route. Louie Galvez made the motion to request Council to authorize closure of streets as set forth in report. Dick Rollins seconded. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. 8. SNACKBAR--A correction is made From $13,500 to $1,3SO (April Minutes) for Tim Engel to seal unit. Bottom Doors, roof and inside walls need completion. Grading will be accomplished in 3-q weeks. It was suggested that prior to grading the hot tap and sewer lines be put in. 9. 1966 PARK BOND ACT --Further discussion tabled. 10. TERRACE HILLS PARK --Commissioner Rollins discussed the teenager abuse of Terrace Hills Park. Residents are complaining 6, that they can no longer enjoy taking their little children to the park due to the foul language, drinking and drug use at the park. Commissioner Rollins reminded Committee of an obscure ordinance of a $100 reward for people reporting vandalism of Public Property. This will be researched. Commissioner Rollins suggested discussing this at the next Council meeting. 11. Commissioner Galvez attended a 7 hour American Coaching Effectiveness Program on how to coach chilren. He praised the Soccer Club's presenting of this material and suggested in the Future more clubs utilize or co-sponsor this worthwhile workshop. 12. Chairman Conley reported that no communication as yet has been recieved from Commissioners Percy, Renderhagen or Otter concerning the letters they were sent regarding their attendance at Committee meetings. Meeting adjourned at 9:20 pm. Respectfully submitted, Barbara 11. Conley Chairman,Recording Secretary P9 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM QX) MEETING DATE: August 27, 1987 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT RESIGNATION OF JASON OTTER FROM THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE FUNDING REQUIRED _ NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX Jason Otter has tendered his resignation from the Parks & Recreation Committee effective July 25, 1987. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL: ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF JASON OTTER FROM THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE & SEND LETTER OF APPRECIATION. CDUNCIV AGENDA ITEM a 5740) (4 July 24, ` � n l l� 1987 Jason Otter 2276q DeSot❑ Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Jason, t BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tern Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager SUBJECT:Parks & Recreation Committee Attendance At our last meeting on July 6, 1987 we discussed the participation level of all Commissioners. It has been noted that you attended only half of our regular monthly meetings. The effectiveness of our committee is directly affected by the regular attendance and input of all it's members. It is felt that your attendance for the past year was at an ineffective level. For the upcoming year please evaluate your priorities and other commitments and determine whether your attendance at committee meetings will increase to a more effective level. If you percieve that it will not, please advise Randy Anstine, or this Committee (verbally or in writing) of your resignation of the Parks & Recreation Committee. Thank you for helping the Committee serve the residents of Grand Terrace. Respectfully, L/ Louis GalvBZ 1986!87 Chairman, Parks & Recreation Committee P.S. Effective August 1st, the new Chairperson is Barbara Conley. 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 024-6621„ COMMISSION & COMITTEE REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Auoust 27, 1987 DATE:_,Iulu 6,1987 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARKS AND RECREATION Results OF survey of adjacent homeowners to GriFFin park. LEGAL CONSTRAINTS: 1) No permanent structures on California Aqueduct. 2) 9 Ft. aqueduct needs 20 Ft. easement of each side. 3) Cement Footings for benches, par course, etc. must be approved by DWR. '1) Tree species must be approved DWR. Facts II: RESULTS:(11 out OF 1q Homes surveyed) Most residents were Open to the idea of developing the area into a passive park. Only 2 residents were strongly opposed to no developments and an additional 2 residents,although they didn't oppose, prefered that land stay the same. The following are the concerns the residents had: --Trees ❑K, but keep small so they won't obstruct view --Path OK as long as it is NOT concrete Cto discourage skateboards) --Park benches OK --Picnic Tables: 50/SO. Most residents said picnic tables would then need trash cans, which then bring trash and trash collection problems. Picnic tables also equate with visitors to the area that will stay LONGER than necessary. --SO% said OK to tiny tot area --82i said OK to par course --All residents were concerned about vandalism, skateboards, & meeting place For teenagers if said park was developed beyond any passive usuage. Purchase additional Park land For Future development. CKWNCIL AGENDA ITEM #_ 5A(3) ( h ) 1. Do nothing. 2. Develop a passive park along the guidelines set Forth by homeowners and legal constraints. 3. Consider vacating City ❑wnership. AcceptREQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL ANOZOR STAFF: - - #2 above. m 10111 Nix "�� i COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 1987 DATE: August S. 1967 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARKS AND RECREATION Recreation Services attempt to offer classes/workshops that interest residents. Due to Grand Terrace's growth in recent years, this Committee feels that a Parks & Recreation survey asking residents what they would like to see offered in Grand Terrace by way of Recreational services is needed. Only -one survey has been conducted in the past, during 1981, and we feel it is time for an update. Sample survey attached. Survey will be distributed by way of Grand Terrace Newsletter AND hand delivering to the apartment complexes 4 and moble home park. Committee is requesting Council to approve cost for said project as estimated below (based on 15% response rate of Chamber survey): Printing $160.00 Typesetting ($30/hr) It5.00 Postage Business License 50.00 Normal Mailing feeC800) 176.00 Return Postage Charge additional .23 ea. 184.00 ESTIMATED COST $615.00 ALTERNATIVES Continue attempting to offer classes/excursion/etc. without current accurate information of Community needs. SOLUTION: 1. Reject proposal. Z. Accept proposal. Accept- - #2 above. COUNCIC AGENDA ITEM-0 S71 (1) (C ) 6RAND TERRACE PARKS 3 RECREATION COMMUNITY SURVEY Hale Add The City of Grand Terrace Recreation Services mould like you, the residents of Grand Terrace, to complete the following suri.Es s0 Re—reation Services can better service the needs of the Community. Please take a few minutes to complete, Releiber, we need your input as to the types of classes, excursions, etc you Mould like, 911 those who respond to the survey will be eligible for a drawing for free registration (up to $50) on any Park 5 Recreation sponsored < "�rcurs<on,'day-;_are, ONE ENTRY PER FAMILY PLEASE, 1, Please list the number of people in each age group in your family: _-- 6-4" __-6-63 ___13-16 _-- 20-30 _-41-56 6011 ' ___17-19 --- 31-46 ___51-60 ?, Are you aware of these prograis? If Yes, which programs have you used, _Tiny Tot Programs _—After school programs --Excursions A^t ,. Craft Classes ___Self -Improvement Classes _—E.wii Programs — Easter hunt —_Halloween Haunt ___ 1-day workshops —_Sports Leagues __-Christmas Lightening Seniors Classes/Norkshops S. if 'No" to #2 above, mhy''I ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- 4, !That types of facilities mould you like to see added in Grand Terrace9 ---Tenr:is Courts Handball Courts --_Racquetball __-`logging Trails ike Pata fields _-- h; _—t�''-11 b` _--Sport_s Complex par course uther: Please check the types of excursions you mould be interested in if offered by Recreation Services: —_Las Uegas Turn -a -round —_Hawaii 5-day trip _—Laughlin __Ivstal Cathedral --_Dinner Theatre —_Disneyland --Magic Mountain ___Knotts Perry Farm Island —_Parade of Lights —_P,alona pageant —_Catalina ___Kids Overnight at New Years' Eve --- Other: ------------------------------- ,.,-------------- ,Nhat types of classes would you like to see offered by Recreatoin Services? —_Adult Music Classes--Children's Music Classes ___ Craft Classes Kids Craft Classes ___Self -Improvement Classes ___Photography Classes ---': Sp,.rs_ s Fitness lasses{Lfe Specific ----------------- -----------------____-- Seniors ClasseslNorkshops(be specific) --uther(be specific) ---Other(be specific) 1, Nhat DAYS i TIME is most convenient for you participate in our P,ecration program? —__ Monday Time _ Tuesday Tile:______ ___ Nednesday Time:______ ___ Thursday Time:______ ___ Friday Time, _ sturday Time: 8, Rhat did you like best about brand Terrace Recreation Services' Hhy? y. Hhat nould you like to see CHAH&ED in &rand Terrace Recreation Services? Hhy? 6011 ------------------------------ —------ — 3. Rny further cossents you say have: Thank you for your tine in cospleting this questionaire. If you have any questions or concerns about Grand Terrace Recreation :services, you are Nelcose to discuss the; Nith the Recreation Services Staff or cope to the &rand Ter —ace parks r Recreation. Co:sittee Meetings list Monday of each sonth, 7:30 pi) in the Costunity Roos at &rand Terrace Civic center. Yinner's xill be drain and announced in the &rand Terrace Hensletter and contacted by sail. 4 Gr aFd Terrace Par s & Recreation rnmmittee Survey RFERFATION SERVICES City ut Grand Terre e W744 Parton Rd. Brand Terrace. CA 92324 21 TO: Grand Terrace Planning Director FROM- Parks & Recreation Committee SUGJECT: General Plan Update -Park Consideration DATE: August 9, 19B7 Pursuant to Grand Terrace's general plan update, the Parks & Recreation Committee wishes to submit this report to be forwarded and considered by the Consultant for the planning/developing/acquisition of future park sites in Grand Terrace. Please be advised that Grand Terrace is currently below state guidelines (1 acre of park per 1,000 population) For parks. Presently, Grand Terrace has one (1) five acre park with a childrens play area and soccer field. This Committee feels that for a community the size of Grand Terrace, this is not sufficient. Numerous needs of residents for physical activity are Fulfilled outside City boundaries. This Committee proposes that at least one (1) 10-15 acre parcel be considered For a future park/complex. This parcel would be designed to house a Sports Complex to include, but not be limited, by the following AW considerations: -basketball/volleyball court -several Community Services Rooms to be utilzed for Community needs -Shower facilites -tennis court(s) -racketball/handball court(s) -soccer fields/softball diamonds As these needs are not currently met by adequate facilities in Grand Terrace, this complex is necessary. Within the boundaries established by this Committee -North by Barton Rd.,East of Michigan,South by Pico and West by I-21S & railroad tracks -there are numerous large acreage possible sites for a park. The Grand Terrace Parks & Recreation Committee is willing to cooperatie with the Planning Director and Consultant on the needs for additional parks as required. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 AC -IL (3) (d- ) COMMISSION & COMITTEE REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AuIIust 27, 1987 DATE:-nugust 6, 1987 mom SUBJECT: PICO PARK SITE Delays and further stipulations concerning the Pico Park lease. It has been brought to the attention of this Committee that Further stipulationss relating to the Pico Park Site, including an analysis of adequate well water and reimburseing Marygold farms For the crop, has surfaced. the Following is the calendar of events concerning the Pico Park Site: Oct. 1985-Discussions on land & restriction between Committee and Edison Jan. 1986-Park utilization design presented by John Sloane to Committee Oct. 1986-Landscape architect bids authorized for proper land utilization. Dec. 1986-8 proposals received. Jan. 1987-Council voted on possession of land and not subleased out to Marygold Farms -Physical transfer of land delayed due to less than 20 year lease availability. Feb. 1987-Due to no 20 year lease, Marygold Farms has 1 year lease extension from Edison. Feb. 1987-Meeting between Chairman Glavez,Lennie Frost,Randall Anstine concerning 20 year lease. Edison at this time stated they would contact Marygold farms about extending lease 1 more year. March 1987-Paperwork sent to Edison requesting long term lease (20 years) April 1987-Edison put request before their realestate review committee. Julg 1987-Committee voted to request Council to accept 10 acres for development of land. City Council did not receive new request to accept land since new developments/concerns have appeared. Water analysis needs to be completed to see if there is enough water for City and Marygold farms. Marygold Farms is requesting reimbursement of crop if requested to vacate in 1988. Marygold is requesting this since they planted a COMA AGENDA ITEM # 5q (3 ) (e) 5-12 year crop stating they were never contacted by Edison over land situation. Edison is contending that City has never signed a lease so technically Narygold Farms has right to land. ALTERNATIVES: Purchase additional Park land For Future development. SOLUTION: 1. Continue neg❑tiations. Z. Contact Edison ❑ver time lapse and reoccuring new developments/concerns. 3. Abandon project. REQUESTED ACTIDN TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF- Guidance From Council on how Committee should proceed. M COMMISSION & COMITTEE. REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Aio Est 27, 1987 DATE: Julu 6,19B7 - COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARKS AND RECREATION t r- im @ 2imu: n Tour de Terrace Rider safety. In cooperation with the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, the following is a proposal for street closure for both the Mini -Tour, a 1.3 mile tour for S-12 year olds and the Tour de Terrace for Adults. The Sheriff's Department will provide 4 Reserve Officers For traffic control. For the 1.3 mile ride, for the safety of the children, we propose closing De Berry (from Mt. Vernon to Michigan), Michigan Cfrom De Berry to Van Buren) and Van Buren Cfrom Michigan to Mt. Vernon) and a small portion of Mt. Vernon C1 lane only) Csee attached map). Volunteers will be set up to watch streets flowing onto the route. Cars will have access to route when there are no children/bikes presets. MAXIMUM CLOSURE: 2 HOURS TOUR de Terrace will block off De Berry from Warbler to Oriole (see map) for the safety of residents and riders. Detour to park is possible. MAXIMUM CLOSURE: S 112 HOURS Street lights at Barton/Mt. Vernon and Prescott will have momentary red flashing lights at beginning of ride only. Not to close the streets and jeopardize the safety of riders and residents of Grand Terrace. SOLUTION: 1. Reject proposal. 2. Accept proposal. Accept Alternative #2 above. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM:* 5A (3)(F) Wbrbll✓r - nfs- i - cam- 0 , �I U(4ecrs J 8 V �t�IC4�l NCr QLl M-f'-, Vernon A. `5 `I 'Pee:� r` -- �� e.cl y C i I AUG 2 7 1987 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES CONINLITTEE Minutes of August 3, 1987 Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chairman Viola Gratson at 7:10 PM. All members were present. Correction was made to Minutes of the June 1987 meeting again asfollows: Paragraph 3 - The scrapbooks donated by Linda were compiled by Theresa Pratt and given to Linda by Helen Oberschmidt. Ann made a motion to accept the minutes as read, seconded by Irene. Pictures of the Art Show and the new display case were given to Ann by Hannah. Irene made a motion to send a letter and some of the pictures to our sister city in Italy. Ann will work on composing a letter. Country Fair: Notices are ready to go out with the sewer billing at the end of August. Viola is still working on a plaque to go on the new show case. Treasurer's report for August showed no changes. Publicity: Kathy brought a copy of the Quilters Newsletter to show the cone ittee. She is getting an article ready for inclusion on the Country Fair. Irene reported to advertise on cable TV, only local coverage can be reported in Grand Terrace. For wider coverage, news must be suln-Litted in San Bernardino. Linda mentioned the Foothill Journal where we will have a blurb. She has also contacted four artists who would be interested in holding demonstrations in the library prior to our next art show. 4 New Business: Kathy and Viola went to a work shop in San Bernardino on how to get articles in the newspaper sponsored by the Arts Foundation of San Bernadino. The next meeting will be September 14th due to the Labor Day Holiday. Motion was made to adjourn at 7:45 PM by Ann, seconded by Hannah. Respectfully submitted, it, �- HANNAH LAISTER, Secretary -�, ;V -; �1 --LJ j,�� PIL AGENDA ITEM # 5C�li BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN ,Mayo( Pro Tem Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager (fir,. �1 �� Lm � L a_ C �-ram U-QJL2.a� .�--o JL7a - W-I'Ll jj- A14- r 1 V "L- _ n r nn nn L;:wr,4ja- d rirll_- - "4-a � 7 Lin v �, ��1-CUoz�E" � mot.-ry CLc Cu� �-d2 U ,�Lp-u/z rvt G' J V � STAFF REPORT DATE: 9,2�,e� C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: AUG Z't W7 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT, BARTON ROAD - I-215 TO CANAL STREET FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Preliminary studies for the Underground Utility District in the subject area have been completed by Southern California Edison Company. On August 5, 1987 a meeting was held with Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Bell Telephone and cable television personnel to finalize the boundaries of the District. City Council, in their previous meetings indicated that as consideration for dedication along the frontage of Barton Road, in addition to installing the public improvements, for those property owners who have dedicated, conversion from overhead to underground facilities at the individual homes and/or businesses would be done at City expense. Some of the property owners dedicated the right of way only after they were advised of the City's intent to pay for such conversion. Others dedicated prior to this offer by the City. City Council expressed the desire to provide the same benefit to all those dedicating regardless of when the dedication was made. To complete the formation of the Underground Utility District, a public hearing must be held on the proposal. Attached you will find the following: 1. Resolution of th6.City Council setting Pulic Hearing on September 10, 1987 at,6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. 2. Exhibit "A" showing the boundaries of Underground Utility District 87-1. 3. Exhibit "B", legal description of subject boundary. W.V,ft11: AGENDA ITEW * �p�{ Staff Report August 20, 1987 Page Two After adoption of this resolution, with City Council concurrence, staff OW will notify each property owner who has dedicated that for the improved properties, conversions at their individual residence or business shall be at City's expense. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT CITY COUNCIL: 1. AUTHORIZE THE STAFF TO ADVISE ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE DEDICATED THAT CONVERSIONS FROM OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND SERVICE WILL BE COMPLETED AT NO COST TO THEM. 2. ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION. Attachments 4 JK:wl RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN A PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 107 The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. That the public interest and safety require, and it is the intention of this Council, pursuant to the provisions of Grand Terrace City Ordinance No. 107 relating to utility undergrounding procedural regulations, to order the construction or certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in an Underground Utilities District. Section 2. That construction of certain improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work and acquisition, if necessary, in certain public streets and rights -of -way in the Underground Utilities District, as set forth in Exhibit "A", City of Grand Terrace proposed boundaries of Underground Utilities District attached hereto and incorporated herein; and described in Exhibit "B", both attached hereto and incorporated herein. 4 Section 3. That said work shall include the removal of all poles, overhead wires, and overhead structures constructed within the area shown in Exhibit "A". Section 4. That except for cost of connection to a new underground service lateral, conversion of said overhead public utility lines underground will be at no cost to property owners. Section 5. Property owners shall reconnect their buildings to new underground lines. Service laterals will be provided without cost to property owners up to one hundred (100) feet from the utilities main line. Section 6. Notice shall be given each property to connect to underground facility. Those property owners not in compliance within thirty (30) days thereafter shall be futher noticed. If after ten (10) days thereafter the property is still not in compliance, the City Engineer or his designee shall have the work done and the property owner billed for the cost. Nonpayment five (5) working days thereafter shall cause the bill to be placed on the tax bill of the affected property owners, subject to Government Code Section 38793. Section 7. All the certain territory in the District included within the exterior boundary lines shown on the plot exhibiting the property affected or benefited by said work and improvements in the Underground Utilities District, said map titled and identified as Proposed Boundaries of Underground Utilities District, and which said map was heretofore approved and which said map or diagram is on file with the transcript of these proceedings. For all particulars as to the boundaries of the Underground Utilities District, reference is hereby made to said boundary map heretofore previously approved, and for a complete description of said Underground Utilities District, the said plat and proposed boundary on file shall govern. 4 Section 8. For any and all information relating including information relating to protest procedure, your directed to the persons designated below: Procedural Inquiries City Manager, Thomas Schwab 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Telephone: (714) 824-6621 Technical Inquiries: City Engineer, Joe Kicak 22365 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Telephone: (714) 825-3825 to these proceedings attention is w Section 9. Pursuant to the provisions of Grand Terrace Ordinance No. 107, a public hearing will be held to find and determine whether the public interest, necessity, health, safety or welfare will be benefited by said work or improvements. Such hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California at 6:30 p.m., September 10, 1987. The decision of the City Council shall be final and conlusive. ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: City Manager of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. thereof. I, THOMAS SCHWAB, City Manager of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 27th day of August, 1987, by the following vote: -2- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: City Attorney -3- City Manager illw mm -< p b G) rn — 0 C x Z 77-451-015 --j --i N 7m0 m = U' � v ID MICHIGAN ST. N m o Y C I^' T Zi D 0 O -n Z N CID A242 — 1 VIVIEN 277-121-036 — 13 AVE. 277-121-016 277-121-017 42-011 277-121-033 275-242-010 277-121-032 275-242-009 0 277-121-019 275-242-006 n 275-242-007 277-121-020 co O C 275 -242-006 Z 277-121-021 — D 275-242-(M 277-121-022 275-242 - I 277-121-023 275-242-024 0 275-242-002 CANAL _ --- POI NT OF BEGINNING EXHIBIT "B" UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DISTRICT 87-1 City of Grand Terrace, California That certain parcel of land located in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, being more particularly 4 described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Canal Street and Barton Road; THENCE Westerly along said centerline of Barton Road to the intersection of said centerline with the Northerly prolongation of the Easterly line of the Westerly 150 feet of the Northerly 415.27 feet of Lot 2 of East Riverside Land Company, as per map on file in Book 6 Page 44 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California; THENCE Southerly along said prolongation and along the Easterly line of said 150 foot wide parcel to the Southeast corner thereof; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of said 150 foot wide parcel to the intersection of said Southerly line with the Easterly line of Lot 3 of said East Riverside Land Company map; THENCE Southerly along said Easterly line to the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of said Lot 3 to the Southwest corner thereof; THENCE Northerly along the lot line common to Lots 3 and 4 of said East Riverside Land Company to the Northeast corner of the Southerly 203.39 feet of said Lot 4; THENCE Westerly along the Northerly line of said 203.39 foot wide parcel to the Southwest corner of the Easterly 210.23 feet of said Lot 4; THENCE Northerly along the Westerly line of said 210.23 foot wide parcel to the Southeast corner of a parcel of land, the Southerly line thereof being 243 feet Southerly of said centerline of Barton Road; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of said parcel to the Southwest corner thereof, being a point 305 feet Easterly of the Easterly Right of Way line of Michigan Street; THENCE Northerly along the Westerly line of said parcel to the Southeast corner of a parcel of land, the Southerly line thereof being 225 feet Southerly of said centerline of Barton Road; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of said parcel to the intersection of said Southerly line with said Easterly Right of Way line of Michigan Street; THENCE Northerly along said Easterly Right of Way line to the intersection of said Easterly Right of Way line with the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly line of Parcel Map No. 3803, on file in Book 410 49 Pages 16 and 17 of Parcel Maps, Records of said County; THENCE Westerly along said prolongation and along all the various courses of said Northerly line to the intersection of said Northerly line with the Easterly Right of Way line of Interstate Highway 215; THENCE Northeasterly along said Easterly Right of Way line through all its various courses, to the intersection of said Right of Way line with the Northerly line of Lot 1, Block "F" as per Map of Resubdivision of Grand Terrace Tract, on file in Book 1 Page 33 of Record of Surveys, Records of said County; THENCE Easterly along said Northerly line to the intersection of said Northerly line with the centerline of Vivienda Avenue; THENCE Southwesterly along said centerline of Vivienda Avenue to the intersection of said centerline with the Westerly prolongation of the • Northerly line of Lot 19 of G.M. Curtis Tract, Tract No. 2966, on file in Book 40 Page 46 of Maps, Records of said County; THENCE Easterly along said prolongation and along the Northerly line of Lots 19 through 11 of said G.M. Curtis Tract, and along the Easterly prolongation thereof, to the Southeast corner of a parcel of land 100 feet wide, lying adjacent to and Easterly of said Lots 10 and 11 of said G.M. Curtis Tract; THENCE Northerly along the Easterly line of said 100 foot wide parcel to the Southwest corner of a parcel of land, the Southerly line thereof being 130 feet Southerly of the centerline of McClarren Street; THENCE Easterly along said Southerly line and along the Easterly prolongation thereof to the intersection of said prolonged line with said centerline of Canal Street; THENCE Southeasterly along said centerline to the Point of Beginning. MEMORANDUM TO: General Distribution DATE: 8/21/87 FROM: Thomas Schwab SUBJECT: Agenda Item VD 0� Due to the fact that we have just learned that People Helpers will no longer be in business effective September 1, 1987, we have placed this item on the agenda. We will have it prepared and on Council's desk for review Tuesday afternoon, August 25, 1987. TS:Ic cm LX?UWIL AGENDA ITEM # I -D ;/U 11 DATE:8/16/87 S T A F F R E F 0 R T C R A 4 AGENDA ITEM ITEM ( ) NO. COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE:8/27/87 SUBJECT <.�p ESTABLISHMENT OF AN IN-HOUSE RECREATION PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED Mr, Bil Aulenbach, President of People Helpers Incorporated, has informed staff, that effective September 1, 1987, his company will cease all contract operations, and close its doors.This decision was prompted due to the fact that People Helpers was unable to renew its ,annual liability insurance. Staff does not Feel compelled to try and convince Council of the importance of retaining this City program, since no one knows better than Council, as to what an outstanding and successful service it is to the Grand Terrace residents. Since the staff is actually the program, the existing People Helpers staff would be retained if Council approves the proposed budget. Staff has also been able to convince Renee McCarthy to return as the Recreation Supervisor, and oversee the program. Though the proposed budget may seem large at the onset, we must keep in mind that this service is anticipating generating revenue approximated at $100,000.All proposed salaries were arrived at by utilizing the 1986 California Parks and Recreation Society Salary Survey, as well as performing a comparison survey with adjacent communities. Armed with the facts, the staff is pleased to present to the City Council, the proposed FY 87/88 Recreation Services budget. In addition, if Council approves in-house recreation services, Council will be reqquired to adopt the attached Resolution rescinding Resolution 87-13 and establish classifications and salary ranges for the employees of the City of Grand Terrace (this includes the positions of Recreation Supervisor full-time (1), Child/Day Care Coordinator part-time (1), Head Teachers full-time C3), Recreation Leaders full-time (2), Recreation Aides part-time. Staff is proposing that the Recreation Supervisor, receive full City benefits, with all other staff receiving paid holidays and two weeks annual vacation. Since Council has already appropriated a total of $87,500 For Fund 10-q30 Parks and Recreation, it has been determined that an additional $53,540.00 will have to be appropriated to fund this activity From September 1, 1987 through June 30, 1987. This will bring C:0UJ 1C AGENDA ITEM 5'7 the Fund total to $lg1,0g0.00. OF this dollar amount, a total of $111,S�t0.00 will be utilized For recreation services and programs, with the remaining $29,S00.00 being utilized For maintenance & operation of the City parks. Staff Recommends that the Council: APPROVE B ING G THE RECREATION PROGRAM IN-HOUSE; ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 87-13 AND ESTABLISH CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE; APPROPRIATE $S3,5gO TO DEPARTMENT q30 FROM THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE. DETAIL OF RECREATION REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REVENUE $ 9,800.00 $ 9,2S0.00 $ 2,000.00 $68,750.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 700.00 $ 8,000.00 $ S00.00 Lpw $100,000.00 Total EXPENDITURES $S,300.00 $6,500.00 $1,500.00 $66,800.00 $2,500.00 $1 ,'t00 .00 $ 500.00 $5,BOO. 00 $100,000.00 -$ 90,100.00 REVENUE EXPENDITURES $ 9,90u.ou TOTAL REVENUE GAIN ACTIVITY TINY TOT PROGRAM SOFTBALL EXCURSIONS AFTER SCHOOL REC. CHRISTMAS OAYCAMP SPRING DAYCAMP CONTRACT CLASSES SANTA VISITS ACTIVITY TINY TOT PROGRAM SOFTBALL EXCURSIONS AFTER SCHOOLREC. CHRISTMAS OAYCAM SPRING DAYCAMP SANTA VISITS CONTRACT CLASSES FUND: GENERAL (10) DIVISION: PARKS & RECREATION C13O) DEPT.COMM.SCVS. LINE ITEM TITLE 1987/88 ESTIMATED PERSONNEL 110 SALARIES $70,700.00 115 OVERTIME $ 1,000.00 138 MEDICARE $ 9`i6 .00 139 DEFERRED COMP/INSUR.BENEFITS $ 3,231.00 1'f0 RETIREMENT $ 2,213.00 1'f1 S.U.I. $ 2,710.00 1Lf2 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE $ 89Lt.00 MAINTENANCE & OPERATION 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE $ 9,750.00 230 ADVERTISING $ 3,000.00 238 UTILITIES $1't,000.00 2Lt2 RENTS & LEASES - PROPERTY $ 500.00 2'i5 MAINTENANCE BLDGS. & GROUNDS $12,000.00 2'f6 MAINTENANCE & OPERATION OF EQUIP. $ 3,000.00 255 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $17,090.00 $1't 1 , 'f . 00 RESOLUTION NO. 87-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-13 AND ADJUSTING THE SALARY RANGES FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has determined the need to adjust the salary ranges for the positions contained in this resolution: NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT - That Resolution No. 87-13 is hereby amended. SECTION 2. Classifications/Salary Ranges - That the following job classifications and salary ranges are hereby established for employees of the City of Grand Terrace, and said salary ranges shall be effective August 3, 1987. TITLE Assistant City Manager Planning Director City Clerk Assistant Finance Director Assistant to the City Manager Recreation Supervisor Deputy City Clerk Senior Account Clerk Planning Aide Maintenance Lead Person Minutes Clerk/Records Clerk Maintenance Worker Clerk Typist SALARY RANGE Minimum Midpoint Maximum 2,708.44 3,187.72 3,677.00 2,403.73 2,827.38 3,251.02 2,070.18 2,435.88 2,801.58 2,070.18 2,435.88 2,801.58 1,917.54 2,255.68 2,593.82 1,750.00 2,050.00 2,350.00 1,629.22 1,916.48 2,203.74 1,425.89 1,678.10 1,930.30 1,384.36 1,629.22 1,874.08 1,370.21 1,611.50 1,852.78 1,294.26 1,522.16 1,750.06 1,252.92 1,474.46 1,696.00 1,220.06 1,435.24 1,650.42 I TITLE Day/Child Care Coordinator (33hrs. per week) Head Teachers Receptionist Recreation Leaders Recreation Aide ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: SALARY RANGE Minimum Midpoint Maximum 8.00 hr. 8.50 hr. 9.00 hr. 7.00 hr. 7.50 hr. 8.00 hr. 6.2010 hr. 6.8689 hr. 7.5366 hr. 5.50 hr. 6.00 hr. 6.50 hr. 3.50 hr. 4.75 hr. 6.00 hr. City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof. +, thereof. I, Thomas Schwab, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 27th day of August, 1987, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: City Attorney City Clerk - 2 -