Loading...
10/22/1987COUNTER COPY - PLEASE DO NOT REMOV€-- FROM LIBRARY COUNTER!! 2 T. CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR MEETINGS 2nd and 4th Thursdays - 5:30 p.m. October 22, 19$7 Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center _ 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 f City Councilmembers Byron R. Matteson, Mayor BErbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember ' Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager j Randa!+ L. lanstine, Assistant City Manager (favid R. Sawyer, Planning Director Nita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Joseph "icak, City Engineer Ivan L. Hopkins, City Attorney l s t ! ! City Office: 824-6621 REVISED CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS October 22, 1987 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 5:30 P.M. 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order * Invocation - Rev. Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call i Staff Recommendations Council Action CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of Minutes 10/8/87 Approve 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA102287 Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Certificates of Commendation to be presented to the Grand Terrace Strikers Soccer Team. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. PENDING CIA APKOVAL OCT z /' 681 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 08, 1987 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 08, 1987, at 5:32 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Vice Chairman Hugh J. Grant, Agency Member Dennis L. Evans, Agency Member Susan Shirley, Agency Member Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Secretary Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney David Sawyer, Planning Director ABSENT: Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 24, 1987 MINUTES CRA-87-41 Motion by Vice Chairman Pfennighausen, second by Agency Member Evans, ALL AYES, to approve September 24, 1987 minutes. CRA meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held Thursday, October 22, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. 4br Respectfully submitted: Secretary APPROVED: Chairman RA AGENDA ITEM NO. OCT 2 2 1987 CHECK NUMBER (1) 17533 (2) 17535 (3) 17540 (4) 17548 (5) 17557 SUSAN CRAWFORD DENNIS EVANS HUGH GRANT BYRON MATTESON BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE OCT. 22. 1987 PENDMG CRA APPROVAL CHECK REGISTER NO.CRA102287 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF OCT. 22, 1987 STIPENDS FOR OCT., 1987 STIPENDS FOR OCT., 1987 STIPENDS FOR OCT., 1987 STIPENDS FOR OCT., 1987 STIPENDS FOR OCT., 1987 TOTAL $150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 $750.00 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER a n PENDING CITY OCT � r3�� UUCFikE; C I I Y Uf GUAr11 11kPA(.I i 1 7 VOUCHER/CHECK PFGI5TI P. COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ALL PFRIODS CHECK REGISTER NO. 102287 V'-'UCHEF/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUPlBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT D>302 (-720 SO.CA.FDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/19SCE 81.44 P5303 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/1,SCG 6.44 P5304 6614 THOMAS SCHWAB TRAVEL AOVANCE,SCHWAB.L.C.C. 150.00 P5305 6603 DAVID SAWYER TRAVEL ADVANCE,SAWYER,L.C.C. 100.00 P5306 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/2,SCG 34.15 P5307 2867 G.T.MAILERS RETURN POSTAGE,REC.COMMITTEE 50.00 P5308 6882 SWEET NOTHINGS FROZEN YOGURT YOGURT,DAY CARE 46.00 P5309 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY - --CASH PAYT,10/59SCE 145.41 P5310 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/51SCG 52.16 P5311 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/6,SCE 238.86 P5312 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/61SCG 38.25 P5313 6531 SHERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL LAW ENFORCEMENT,10/87 519559.17 -- - --CRI-ME--PREVENTION OFFICER910/87 39461.83 P5314 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/7,SCE 131.93 P5315 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/89SCE 71.31 CASH PAYT.10/89SCG 9.76 P5317 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/99SCE 3.53 - P5318 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT PROCESS,DAY CARE 198.00 P5319 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/13,SCE 29.48 P5320 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY CASH PAYT.10/13,SCG 19.44 P5321 4110 KICAK E ASSOCIATES ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 929.00 ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 889.00 ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 79356.90 ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 19027.30 ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 5,381.00 ENG.SVCS.8/24-9/20/87 43.50 P5322 URISA URISA MGT.11/6,D/S E J/R 120.00 P5323 AMFRICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ASPA MGT.10/15,0/S E J/R 16.00 17508 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHEST X-RAY,REC.PERSONNNEL 45.00 CHECK AMOUNT 81.44 6.44 150.00 100.00 34.15 50.00 46.00 145.41 52.16 238.86 38.25 559OZ1.00 - 131.93 81.07 3.53 198.00 - 29.4,8 19.44 159626.70 120.00 16.00 45.00 vh VOUCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE 10/16/87 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER NAMF DESCRIPTION 17509 LARRY PALACIOS REFUND REC.CLASS,PALACIOS 17510 GLADYS WONG REFUND.REC.CLASS,WONG 17511 SANDY CAMPBELL REFUND,REC.CLASS,CAMPBELL 17512 MARY IVERSON REFUND,REC.CLASS,IVERSON 17513 HIWAY MARKING SYSTEMS,INC. SAND HOPPER/PRESSURE WASHER 17514 NENITA DIEPARINE W.W.D.REFUND,DIEPARINE 17515 WILLIAM SORENSEN W.W.D.REFUND,SORENSEN 17516 ROBERT VARENELLI W.W.D.REFUND,VARENELLI 17517 THOMAS SEMPH W.W.D.REFUND,SEMPH 17518 DOROTHY POSADAS W.W.D.REFUND,POSADAS 17519 WES STONEBREAKER W.W.D.REFUND,STONEBREAKER 17520 RUSSELL SUTLIFF W.W.D.REFUND,SUTLIFF 17521 LARRY ESTES W.W.D.REFUND,ESTERS 17522 MRS. RICHARD STEELE-- -W-.-W.D.REFUND,STEELE 17523 1024 ACCENT PRINT 6 DESIGN FLYERS,T/D/T 17524 1170 ANY HOUR LOCK E SAFE DEADBOLT,COMMUNITY CENTER DEADBOLT,COMMUITY CENTER 17525 1360 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER,10/14,DAY CARE BOTTLED WATER,10/14,C/C --- BOTTLED WATER910/149DAY CARE BOTTLED WATER,10/147DAY CARE 17526 1365 BAYLESS STATIONERS COMPUTER PAPER COMPUTER PAPER 17527 1371 BECKLEY LARDY RECREATION SUPPLIFS 17528 1485 JUANITA BROWN LOCAL MILEAGE,BROWN C.C.A.MGT.BROWN 17529 1495 JUANA BURNS REC.INSTUCTOR,ROLLER SKATE 17530 1782 VALFRIE COFSKY REC.INSTRUCTOR,GYMNASTICS REC.INSTRUCTOR,TINY TUMBLER ITEM AMOUNT 45.00 70.00 83.00 24.00 397.50 14.00 11.73 16.00 16.00 16.00 11:73 7.70 9.33 16.00 521.36 65.44 77.52 11.50 20.60 23.00 5.75 173.74 173.73 251.25 13.00 47.25 168.00 56.00 72.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 45.00 70.00 83.00 24.00 397.50 14.00 11.73 16.00 16.00 16.00 11.73 7.70 9.33 -16.00 521.36 142.96 60.85 347.47 251.25 60.25 168.00 128.00 1h JUCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 3 ATE 10/16/87 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17531 1840 COLTONi CITY OF W.W.D.SVCS.10/87 209699.76 20t699.76 17532 1875 COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS EXTRA COPIES.LARGE COPIER 758.10 758.10 17533 1899 SUSAN CRAWFORD CRAWFORD, 10/87 150.00 CRAWFORD9 10/87 150.00 300.00 17534 2042 DICKSON CO.OF INLAND EMPIRE STREET SWEEPINGi9/87 29520.84 29520.84 17535 2278 DENNIS L. EVANS EVANS 10/87 150.00 EVANS 10/87 150.00 300.00 17536 2301 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP OVERNIGHT LETTER DEL.PLANNING 14.00 14.00 17537 2665 FOOTHILL JOURNAL NOTICE/PUBLIC HEARING 6.38 6.38 17538 2867 G.T.MAILERS MAIL PICK-UP910/87 100.00 100.00 17539 2929 GRAND VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH RENT CHURCHeDAY CARE(2 MO.) 660.00 660.00 17540 2950 HUGH GRANT GRANTS 10/87 150.00 GRANTv 10/87 150.00 300.00 -- 17541 3163 HEALTH NET HEALTH IN5:11/879DUGHMAN 82.11 HEALTH INS.11/879B/M E B/P 164.22 HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 164.22 HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 164.22 - HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 210.41 HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 246.33 HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 82.1-1 -- - HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 246.33 HEALTH INSURANCE911/87 82.11 19442.06 17542 3218 HYDREX PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL910/879C/C 48.00 1i8.00 17543 3480 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LIMITED BUS/RECREATION9SOLVANG 600.00 600.00 17544 3860 SUSAN KAUFFMAN REC.INSTRUCTOR,TODDLER EXPRESS 60.00 REC.INSTRUCTOR,L/I AEROBICS 63.00 123.00 17545 4160 KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION JANITORIAL SUPPLIESgC/C 278.68 278.68 17546 4164 K MART d443Z SAFETY BOOTS/MAINT. 91.10 91.10 1.7547 4470 LOMA LINDA DISPOSAL TRASH PICK910/879C/C 38.35 TRASH PICK-UP,10/879PARK 38.35 76.70 17548 4658 BYRON MATTESON MATTESONi10/87 67.89 MATTESON910/87 150.00 217.89 17549 4718 MORGAN AND FRANZ LIFE INSURANCEt11/87 14.50 4 IUCHREG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 4 1TE 10/16/87 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE,11/87 14.50 LIFE INSURANCE,11/87 13.25 LIFE INSURANCE911/87 21.75 LIFE INSURANCE911/87 7.25 LIFE INSURANCE911/87 20.50 LIFE INSURANCE911/87 6.00 97.75 17550 4890 JEAN MYERS CROSSING GUARD19/21-10/2/87 127.20 127.20 17551 5527 THOMAS B. PAGE PARK CLEAN-UP99/87 130.00 130.00 17552 5529 PACIFIC BELL PHONE,OAY CARE 39.57 INSTALL PHONE,COM.CENTER 183.38 COMPUTER PHONE 7.61 COMPUTER PHONE 7.62 PAY PHONE,CIVIC CENTER 25.42 PAY PHONE,CIVIC CENTER 31.50 295.10 17553 5538 PATTON SALES CORP. FURNITURE/FIRE STATION 2,161.76 29161.76 17554 5544 PEP BOYS GAS CANS,EOC 79.08 79.08 17555 5545 PETRA ENTERPRISES FLYERS,HALLOWEEN 173.86 173.86 17556 5564 PERSONAL REPORT SUBSCRIPTION,PERSONAL REPORT 36.00 36.00 17557 5576 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN -PFENNIGHAUSEN 10/67 67.89 PFENNIGHAUSEN 10/87 150.00 217.89 17558 5580 VIC PFENNIGHAUSEN REPAIR EOC EQUIPMENT 47.75 47.75 17559 5581 PETTY CASH REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 25.41 REIMB.PET-TY CASH,GENERAL 3.00 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 12.76 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 8.50 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 14.71 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 11.10 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 68.20 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 6.35 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 91.11 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 11.00 REIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 25.81 RFIMB.PETTY CASH,GENERAL 8.55 286.50 17560 5583 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB.DAY CARE 114.22 114.22 17561 5670 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY NOTICE NEG.DECLARATION 33.66 33.66 17562 6314 RANDY RUFFNER REC.INSTRUCTOR,KARATE 135.00 135.00 17563 6502 SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF SMALL TOOLS, MAINT. 158.50 j li 4 iUCHRFG CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PAGE 5 ATE 10/16/87 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK NUMBER NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT SMALL TOOLS,STRFETS 28.40 186.90 17564 6614 THOMAS SCHWAB LOCAL MILEAGEeSCHWAB 38.75 L.C.C.CONF.SCHWAB ($150 ADVANC 4.41 43.16 17565 6655 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. SIGNAL MAINT.9/87 219.48 SIGNAL REPAIR?M/B E P/B- 466.79 686.27 17566 6681 SMART E FINAL IRIS COMPANY HALLOWEEN CANDY - 183.93 183.93 17567 6720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY ELEC.2 LIGHTSsPARKS 25.06 - EL-EC.SIGNAL (-1-) 113.87 ST.LIGHTS,9/87 29542.16 29681.09 17568 6730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY GASt-CITY BLOG.(1) 3.46 GAS9CIVIC CENTER 47Z.07 475.53 -- 17569 6736 SOUTHWEST CYCLING AD/ARTWORK9T/D/T 41.00 41.00 17570 6752 SPECIALIZED FREIGHT/WATER BOTTLE59T/D/T 57.40 57.40 17571 6844 THE SUN NOTICE/PUBLIC HEARING 16.44 NOTICE/PUBLIC HEARING 17.30 33.74 17572 7060 UCI EXTENTION REGENTS SEMINAR/PLANNING90/S E J/R 250.00 250.00 - 17573 7309 UNION OIL CO.OF CALIFORNIA - FUEL-gT-RUCK-E LAWN -MOWER 63.92 63.792 17574 7788 LAURA WATSON REC.INSTRUCTOR9GUITAR 64.00 64.00 17575 7880 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CALIF.CODE UPDATE 47.83 47.83 TOTAL CHECKS 111040.04 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR j PENDING CITY OCT 2 2 1987 COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 08, 1987 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 08, 1987, at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney David Sawyer, Planning Director ABSENT Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Evans. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 5:35 p.m. ITEMS DELETED FROM THE AGENDA Mayor Matteson asked if there were any items to be deleted from the agenda. The Assistant City Manager asked the Mayor if he wanted to address the request from T.J. Austyn. The Mayor stated the request of T.J. Austyn asking to have their public hearing continued to the next Council Meeting - Item 6(C) -- T.J. Austyn - Tentative Tract Map 13050. Mayor Matteson asked if there were any other items to be deleted. The Assistant City Manager replied, none. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Proclamation Councilmember Grant presented a proclamation proclaiming "Red Ribbon Drug & Alcohol Abuse Prevention Week," October 25-31, 1987, with the Crime Prevention Officer, Sharon Korgan receiving the proclamation. Proclamation Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen presented a proclamation proclaiming "Water Awareness Week," October 19-24, 1987. COLiRCIL AGENDA ITEM * 3 D Proclamation Councilmember Evans presented a proclamation proclaiming "Crime Prevention Month," October 1987, with Sharon Korgan receiving the proclamation. Proclamation Councilmember Shirley presented a proclamation proclaiming "Colonial Heritage Week," October 4-10, 1987. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Matteson asked Council if there were any items on the Consent Calendar to be removed for discussion. Councilmember Shirley requested Item D(3) -- Approve September 24, 1987 Minutes. Councilmember Grant requested Items A -- Approve Check Register 46 No. 100887, D(1) -- Approve September 10, 1987 Minutes and D(3) -- Approve September 24, 1987 Minutes. CC-87-182 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, second by Councilmember Evans, ALL AYES, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Item B - Ratify October 08, 1987 CRA Action Item C - Waive Full Reading of Ordinances and Resolutions on Agenda Item D(2) - Approve September 15, 1987 Minutes. Item E - Renewal of Entitlement Agreement with San Bernardino County Housing & Community Development Department. Councilmember Grant stated on page 1, Voucher No. P5282, Peat Marwick Main & Company MEET. B/P, D/E, Growth Control $200.00 and asked what the abbreviation and initials say? Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen addressed Councilmember Grant stating it was a Conference in Ontario on Growth Control and two Councilmembers attended. Councilmember Grant asked Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen if she was informed about this from the Reading Box. She replied eyes. " CC-87-189 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. P5282. Councilmember Grant stated that in reference to Item D(1), Minutes of September 10, 1987, page 2, he had a few questions. He questioned the way the procedure is when there is a vote with an abstention? It should read 4-0-1. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 2 CC-87-190 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to approve Minutes of September 10, 1987. Councilmember Shirley stated in reference to Item D(3), since she was not present, she pulled the Minutes for a separate vote. Councilmember Grant stated in reference to Item D(3), pages 12 and 14, that the word "or not" should be taken out since it was a choice he was making and requested that the Minutes be modified. CC-87-191 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Councilmember Evans, ALL AYES, to approve Minutes of September 24, 1987. 4W PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Mayor Matteson opened the meeting for public participation. Ed O'Neal Mr. O'Neal spoke in favor of Fieldcrest Homes. He feels it is 22608 Minona Dr. a neat, clean construction operation and hoped others would join him in applauding Fieldcrest for being such good neighbors. Robert Faries Mr. Faries stated he has nothing against progress and all they 12391 Oriole have ever asked of Fieldcrest is to comply with the ordinances. He stated they have been doing a good job lately, but he will not join in applauding them because they are good neighbors, they are neat, but that is about all. 06 Bill Dodge Mr. Dodge presented to Council his update on Fieldcrest Homes 22887 Finch St. and stated they have made an effort to comply. ORAL REPORTS Phylis Forbes Ms. Forbes reminded Council about the Installation Dinner on Grand Terrace October 24, 1987 at Shandin Hills Golf Club and the Ribbon Chamber of Cutting Ceremony on October 16, 1987 at 1:30 p.m. She stated Commerce that the Chamber of Commerce is asking for help in selecting the "Citizen of the Year," indicating that Chamber has forms in their office. Virginia Harford Ms. Harford stated the Foothill Journal received a letter from 11825 Arliss Way Gary Meckling of Fieldcrest Homes in defense of the problems and asked Council if they would like her to go and get it. Mayor Matteson asked her to give a copy to the Assistant City Clerk and she would get copies to Council. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 3 COMMITTEE REPORTS Crime Prevention Ms. Korgan stated the Crime Prevention Committee had a meeting Recreation Sharon Korgan Monday and discussed problems that the Parks and in the The Crime Crime Prevention Committee have with vandalism park. Prevention Committee is trying to assist the Parks and Officer Recreation Committee with this problem. She believes when they put a Citizen's Patrol into force, it will help with the problems. Citizen Patrol Mayor Matteson asked if they had a date for the Citizen's things Patrol? Ms. Korgan replied, no, because there are many that will have to take place, like the donation of the car, training, et cetera, it will probably take several months. CC-87-192 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Councilmember Evans, ALL AYES, to appoint Bea Gigandent to the Crime Prevention Committee. Councilmember Grant felt Ms. Gigandent would do an outstanding job on the Committee as she watches out and gets involved. He felt she would be a great asset to the Committee. Councilmember Evans concurred with Councilman Grant, that she will bring, as a Senior Citizen, a different facet to the Committee, which he feels is a very viable Committee in our community. Parks and Ms. Conley, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Committee, Recreation stated she had no comments on the minutes. She stated that Committee they did receive a letter from the Consultant stating that he, Barbara nley in general, agreed with the Committee, but they felt they 22285 Dove St. should have either been told that it was not necessary for him to get back to the Committee or that the Committee should know what is in the General Plan Update prior to it reaching the public. Mayor Matteson concurred with that and asked Council what was their desire. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated at the last Council Meeting when this was discussed, a comment was made by Councilmember Grant that this Committee nor any citizens of any other Committee had not been prohibited from meeting specifically with the General Plan Consultant and that lead in a Minute search. A motion was adopted, which was made by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Grant, that all communication with the Consultant procedurally would go to the Planning Director and/or to the City Manager, then be transmitted to the Committee and no direct contact was going to be allowed. She stated she and Councilmember Evans felt this was an unnecessary restraint of citizens from a service of which they were paying for. They lost in that vote 3-2, the Motion was to establish Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 4 the chain of command. The Consultant was to be insulated and all communications had to go by an avenue set by the Council on a 3-2 vote - that is a matter of Minutes record. Mayor Matteson stated he still agreed with that motion and felt it is a viable situation. Councilmember Grant read specific parts of the past Minutes stating that the comments by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen were incorrect; they had never said this Committee or any other Committee, could not be involved with the Consultant; all they have ever asked for was to involve the Planning Director and City Manager. He stated no one has responded to this Committee's request for input. It is not because the Committee has not asked for it, it is because this Consultant has independently failed to respond to them. Councilmember Shirley stated her position has been fiscal. She feels if they open up the Consultant to talking to all the different interest groups, the bill is going to be astronomical since he was hired for a certain number of hours, and that is the reason she voted that Council go through the Planning Director and City Manager. Councilmember Evans asked the Parks and Recreation Chairman if he understood her concerns, that she has made efforts to go through the Planning Director and the City Manager to get the Consultant to give them input. Ms. Conley replied they understood it to mean that whatever communication they had for the Consultant was to be given to the Planning Director and he would forward it onto the Consultant. At no time were they to have direct access, to the Consultant. Councilmember Evans asked Ms. Conley if she had received any correspondence with any suggested position of the Consultant, except for the memorandum that was submitted to you on Monday? She replied "no." Councilmember Evans asked, so you have made efforts and have not been responded to adequately in your opinion? Ms. Conley replied she felt they had not set up proper channels on how the Committees were to be responded to. They sent a report to the Consultant and have no idea as to what stage he is at. She assumes he will be forwarding something onto Council and the City. She felt the Committee should be able to look at it prior to it going to the City. She stated their argument was not that they could not talk to the Consultant; it was that, if they sent something through the proper channels, they would like to get responded to before the fact, not after the fact. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 5 Councilmember Evans stated he felt the intent of the policy was not to stifle the Committee or Committees that were interested in the different aspects that go into the document. Mayor Matteson stated he and the Planning Director met with the Consultant in San Francisco and asked him about pinpointing a park site. He stated with the new State laws, they cannot say a particular area can be taken as a park site. He can designate an area as a desirable location. He stated the Parks and Recreation Committee had a fine suggestion, which was denied by Council, when they wanted to go out and find a piece of property and bring it back to Council. He stated that would be an excellent idea, there is no commitment. They would find a piece of property and bring the proposal before Council and Council would make the decision. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she felt it is an far outstanding suggestion, but does not satisfy the Committees' frustrations. The vote was 3-2, it was a vote unanimously in favor of allowing a meeting to occur once that policy had been set and, therefore, the policy is set, the meeting never took place and now the document is ready to come to Council, and the Committee is frustrated because they have not had any input. She felt what they really would like to have the opportunity to do was to address the Consultant and say these are our concerns and needs, do you have any area within our City that you would recommend. She asked Ms. Conley if she understood their request, that would be a viable way to get to their request. Ms. Conley replied, with the exception of speaking directly with the Consultant, they understood they would not have direct contact with the Consultant. The Committee would like to have seen his proposal in the General Plan as it relates to parks. Councilmember Evans read a portion of the letter giving the boundaries and the desires of the Committee that the Parks and Recreation Committee sent to the Consultant. He read a letter from Willdan & Associates, dated October 2, 1987, that was submitted to the Parks and Recreation Committee regarding future park needs. Councilmember Grant stated he wanted to make it clear that Council wanted to involve the prime participants, the Planning Director and the City Manager, they did want this participation. Councilmember Evans stated the Committee report suggested that they act on accepting Alternative No. 1. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 6 CC-87-193 Motion by Councilmember Evans, second by Councilmember Grant, ALL AYES, that the Consultant allow the Parks and Recreation Committee the opportunity to review the General Plan as it relates to parks prior to community perusal. Councilmember Evans directed to the Planning Director, as a follow-up, to get with the Parks and Recreation Committee to set up a meeting date, whether the Consultant attend or whether there is correspondence which is removed from the General Plan, for the Committee to review and that be done immediately. Councilmember Grant stated as a second to that, he would assume that the City Manager and he should be aware of this meeting and if they feel they should be involved, then do so. Mayor Matteson asked Ms. Conley to go onto Item C - Acceptance and Development of the proposed T.J. Austyn Park. Item C Ms. Conley stated the Committee was given a landscape concept Acceptance & plan relating to the T.J. Austyn Park. They were told that it Development of complied with all the requirements that Council stipulated to the proposed the T.J. Austyn developer. She stated their concerns were they T.J. Austyn Park did not feel there are enough items, such as park benches, tot area, et cetera. She stated they want Council to be aware that additional items will have to go in and funds appropriated from some source to do this. Mayor Matteson questioned the size of the property. The Assistant City Manager stated it will all total a little over an acre. Mayor Matteson asked what was Council's desire. Councilmember Evans stated, after reviewing the staff report and the Committee's report, he felt the problem is that staff has shown them that if they view this as a viable park site with a useable tot lot, the City will have to provide playground equipment. His concern is that if we develop those three -strip parcels, staff is estimating it is going to cost $34,000.00, and in a community of this size, that is a lot of money. Staff does report that $27,000.00 will be generated in park development fees, but that still does not pay for what they had in mind. Staff also made the statement that Council should be aware of the fact that, if this park is developed, staff may approach Council with a request for hiring additional maintenance personnel. He stated he is concerned with spending that much money to develop a strip park. He would rather take the money and put it on Pico Park or apply it to possible park acquisition and put it towards maintenance personnel for the upkeep of those facilities and the existing facilities. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 7 Mayor Matteson stated he felt the City was going to be stuck with that property whatever they end up doing with it. Councilmember Shirley stated she felt it is a viable greenbelt within the City, and stated they would not have to put in the playground equipment. The area could still be utilized by the people in the community for recreation. Ms. Conley stated she felt the question there was, is it being utilized by the people in the area or is it being utilized by the people surrounding the areas only. Councilmember Shirley stated even if it is being utilized by the surrounding people, it is still a benefit for the residents living in Grand Terrace, indicating we need parkland. We obviously are going to need to hire more people, but if we say we are not going to do this and not going to do that, we are not going to get anywhere; therefore, she is in favor of it. Councilmember Grant stated he is in favor of staff's recommendation, we need more greenbelts and parkland, including this. Councilmember Evans stated he felt this plan is not a good sound plan. When you have a strip of land that is divided by two residential streets, that is not good planning and would be a safety hazard. He requested staff to prepare: (1) The current cost of the Griffin Park Site indicating the actual size of that park as it correlates to this particular parcel, and (2) The estimated cost staff feels it would take to maintain this particular site and if we were to assume it, the cost figures for an additional maintenance man. Councilmember Grant asked Councilmember Evans what would be his alternative to accepting this as a park? Councilmember replied, "as it currently stands? I wouldn't." He felt the emphasis should be placed on developing Pico or other park acquisition and felt that is where our money should be directed, not into a small parcel. Mayor Matteson asked the Assistant City Manager if we have accepted this park from T.J. Austyn. The Assistant City Manager stated "no sir, not as of yet." The stipulation by Council was that, when the developer was prepared to start construction, the construction plans for the park site would be approved by the Assistant City Manager and the City Engineer - no construction documents have been submitted to them other than the design concept. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 8 Mayor Matteson asked why are they splitting it into two sections; one for design concept and one for dedication? The Acting City Manager replied mainly because if Council had a problem with this, it would be unreasonable to have the contractor's landscape architect do a full set of construction documents and then turn around and have to change them all. Mayor Matteson asked the Acting City Manager what his opinion was on the design concept, as it is. The Acting City Manager stated it is unfortunate that the strip is bifurcated by so many streets. He would have to concur with Councilmember Evans and stated the main concern staff has is that some definite costs will have to be addressed before accepting this park site. Councilmember Evans stated, assuming the City accepts this park site, staff needs to get with the Parks and Recreation Committee as to what their reservations are as to the minimum amount of equipment. The Committee will need to make a recommendation as to what they fill would be the necessary equipment and then forward that information onto the developer. The Acting City Manager replied it has been done. There was a color rendering that was submitted to the Committee and all of the items that the Committee would have liked to have seen was forewarded to the landscape architect, who, in turn, met with the developer's architect. The developer, Mr. Austyn, refused it. Mr. Austyn felt they were unreasonable demands. Councilmember Evans stated, so this is the best we are going to get. The Acting City Manager stated if you review the conditions of approval as they were layed down by Council, the developer has met the conditions of approval. Councilmember Evans stated this is where we get a into a problem of interpretation. The developer interprets the conditions one way and the Committee and staff interprets the conditions another way. He stated if this is it and they are not going to do anymore, then we either accept it or reject it when this project starts to be developed. The Acting City Manager asked to make a clarification, that if Council does choose to reject this proposed park, it will not be a maintenance problem for the City. The land is being proposed to be dedicated as a park, and if we reject that dedication, that remains the ownership of the property owner and will be theirs to maintain. Mayor Matteson stated he felt the greenery would look better than a dry barren spot. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 9 Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked the Assistant -City Manager what T.J. Austyn stated they would put there specifically. The Assistant City Manager replied giving a rundown out of the design concept. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked if T.J. Austyn was going to be responsible for installing water meters on each piece of property? The Assistant City Manager replied, "yes." Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she would have no problem with this at this point, she does not want to see dirt. She indicated they are going to have to hire additional personnel when they open up additional park sites anyway, but she is opposed to anything additional to what the developer has proposed and will have to make the best of it as it is. She is also opposed to any additional funds being allocated to this area out of City Funds that could be better used for other park 41W sites within our area. CC-87-194 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Shirley, to accept the proposed park site and design concept only. Motion carried with Councilmember Evans voting NOE. Item E Mayor Matteson asked Ms. Conley to continue with Item E -- Commissioners Commissioner's Resignations. Ms. Conley stated it is Resignations self-explanatory. CC-87-195 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to to accept, with regret, the Parks and Recreation Committee resignations and allow these positions to be refilled with dedicated residents with an interest in Parks and Recreation. 4, Councilmember Grant requested that traditional letters of appreciation be sent. Item F Ms. Conley gave an update on the snack bar stating that a local Snack Bar contractor by the name of Chuck Bahovek had volunteered to complete the snack bar. He has come up with a cost estimate of approximately $2,600 to $3,900 to complete this, with the exception of the commercial appliances that were required and the three -hole sink for the inside that he did not have a cost on. She stated the Committee elected to give Chuck the opportunity to complete the snack bar and stated he will probably start the week after next and estimates anywhere from 4 to 6 weeks to complete, depending on whether he can get materials donated and volunteer labor, et cetera. She did not feel he will need any additional funds in the next few weeks. Ms. Conley checked with the Lions Club to see if they are still going to donate the previously allocated amount of $4,000. They told her if they see some progress, it probably will be there for them. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 10 Councilmember Evans asked Ms. Conley how long will it take to complete the snack bar? Ms. Conley replied approximately 30 days, but she is not sure what 30 days means. Councilmember Evans asked the City Attorney if there was any type of agreement that they could have him sign in order to have the snack bar completed in a certain length of time. The City Attorney replied they could work something out. Councilmember Evans asked Ms. Conley if she felt there would be any problem in this individual signing such an agreement. Ms. Conley replied, in her opinion, since he was donating his time to do this, and under those conditions, she was not sure if they could request him to finish it in a certain period of time. Councilmember Evans stated it is a matter then that they feel he would in good faith, finish it in a timely manner. Ms. Conley replied yes, the same faith they put in the last two. Item D Ms. Conley stated they have many questions relating to the Pico Pico Park Site Park Site such as the varying costs and the varying time -frame. The cost has spiraled way out of recognition. She stated the Assistant City Manager presented them with a design concept at the Committee Meeting on Monday. The Committee did agree it was a viable plan that could be started in phases. The issue is, if they are going to take the Pico Park Site, they need to decide what they are going to do on this land, what do they phase in first. The $50,000 that was appropriated for this year, would it develop one entire field, or do they have to prep the entire land before they can do one section. Councilmember Evans presented a plan to the public and Council showing the layout of the Pico Park Site. CC-87-196 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Grant, ALL AYES, to develop this land with the agreed faith in time -line as dedicated by available funds. Councilmember Evans stated if he can't do it in the form of a motion, he would ask for concurrence of this Council that if this plan is accepted conceptually by Southern California Edison, that the Parks and Recreation Committee be instructed to advise staff specifically from this plan as to what they would like to see developed first. Based on the Committee's recommendations, that staff prepare cost factors regarding a parking lot, one ball diamond, possibly tennis courts, and prepare a financial time -table for the first phase to be on-line no later than June 30, 1988. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 11 The City Attorney stated he could make that in the form of a motion. CC-87-197 Motion by Councilmember Evans, second by Councilmember Grant, ALL AYES. Mayor Matteson asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on this matter. John Hanneman Mr. Hanneman stated he is fully against Pico Park, that the 12620 Garden residents were never notified about a park going in there. He Avenue said he felt putting $50,000 on a piece of borrowed land is ridiculous. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated her concern is that the amount is not $50,000, the cost has escalated some place between a half million dollars to a quarter million dollars just to develop this to a part-time day -use facility and that is the way it is going to remain forever, and she is not sure she wants to see it started. She stated they need to look into the cost if they do that; make a partially functional park realizing that it is the way it has to stay forever; to give particular consideration to the residents that are living and bordering that piece of property as to how the arrangement is going to be for the facilities that are going to be put on the land that will have the least impact on them; the least expenditure of park funds so that we can maximize the money that we have to permanent facilities that belong specifically to us, and that is purchased parkland. Ed O'Neal Mr. O'Neal stated every nation has police action and he would 22608 Minona Dr. hate to think that he would turn the greenery over to the criminals and live behind bars. He felt that is an issue that needs to be solved. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated additional concerns that need to be expressed are, they can never put any permanent facilities on this land. Councilmember Evans stated he hoped it was clear that his motion did not mean the actual construction at this particular moment. The motion is going to bring out cost factors. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked Councilmember Evans if she understood that the motion is not getting their approval for the development of that first phase, it is just requesting that staff get the figures and time -line and come back to them for their decision at that time. Councilmember Evans replied, "that is correct." Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 12 Emergency Mr. Hodder stated the base plan has been run through a Operations screening process and compared against County and State Committee guidelines. He stated he is happy to report, there are only a Jim Hodder, couple of minor areas that still need work and stated they are Chairman overall confident that they have got the plan in such a state 22253 Van Buren that it now complies and follows the guidelines set by County and State organizations. He stated the next regular meeting will be on October 19, 1987 and there will be a special speaker by the name of Steve Hurst who is with the California Department of Housing and a resident of Grand Terrace. He will speak on procedures and methods to report damage assessment to State and County authorities. PUBLIC HEARING Councilmember Evans stated that on October 20, 1987, through the Crime Prevention Officer, there will be an earthquake preparedness meeting and felt everyone should try and attend that meeting. He asked Mr. Hodder if he was aware of the exercise coming up? Mr. Hodder replied yes, and thanked Councilmember Evans for the plug. Council recessed at 7:15 p.m. and reconvened at 7:26 p.m. The Planning Director read his staff report regarding the Planning Commission's decision on denying SA-87-8, CDS Engineering, and made reference to the drawings at Council's left and right showing the layout of the project. Mayor Matteson asked the Planning Director to approach the drawings and explain it. The Planning Director started with the Site Plan and pointed out the different areas relating to the project. Mayor Matteson asked CDS Engineering if they wanted to present their proposal on this. Michael Palmer Mr. Palmer stated he is with CDS Engineering and asked the 18002 Sky Park Planning Director questions relating to the options that they Circle, Irvine were given for this project. Option No. 2, stated a revised Site Plan would be to the Planning Department which provides parking for the Retirement Hotel to the south of the property and remove the commercial structure up front and stated his question was, what was to be done with the property if they were to remove this commercial structure. The Planning Director replied, they should submit a revised Site Plan to the Planning Department and reschedule the General Plan and Zoning applications to be heard along with the above -mentioned revised Site Plan. He stated that would be an Council Minutes - 10/08/87 page 13 option that would be opened to them if they wished to go forward to moving the parking to the south and remove the commercial structure. They could then sit down with the Planning Department and devise a landscape plan. Mr. Palmer expressed his concerns that if they went with that plan, they would lose some land for future development on the second phase of this project and economically it would be a burden to the developer. Mayor Matteson asked Mr. Palmer to go to the Site Plan and show Council what he was talking about. Mr. Palmer approached the Site Plan and pointed out the areas relating to the proposal. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked Mr. Palmer to explain the rational of the proposed realignment of the street from the original plan. Mr. Palmer stated that the original approval had parking on both sides and the driveway came right down the middle and there was no access to the residents to get to Barton Road, as far as the pedestrian walkway which created a safety hazard. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated you are also addressing potential development to the south of the Retirement Hotel and she would assume that it will be a like -use to what presently exists there. Mr. Palmer replied yes, but it would be modernized and updated. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated in the process of updating the property and like -use, one of the reasons you are citing request for approval of the commercial building is because of the loss you are suffering by moving the parking to the back. She asked Mr. Palmer if he is planning on replacing structures in the back with structures like they are, single -stories or will he be replacing them with two-story structures? Mr. Palmer replied two-story structures. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked how many units are on the site? Mr. Palmer replied forty-five. Councilmember Evans asked if the Retirement Home property and the property to the south was owned by the same individual? Mr. Palmer replied the same individual. Councilmember Evans stated he assumes the second phase of the project that the owner is considering putting in there is a two-story apartment complex and asked Mr. Palmer if that was a safe assumption and when are they anticipating bringing that plan to the City? Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 14 Mr. Palmer replied that was a safe assumption and that he had no idea since they have to finish this project first. Councilmember Evans stated since you are planning on bringing in a new project, how are the people going to get in and out? Mr. Palmer stated there will be additional accesses coming off of Reed Street. Councilmember Evans stated he had a question for the Planning Director asking would it be better to have the entrances and exits off of Reed into that future development and close off Barton Road or would it be okay to allow access off of Reed and Barton Road. The Planning Director stated, from a Planning standpoint, it (,W would be advantageous to have entrances and exits off of Reed. He stated if you close off Barton Road, you will have all the traffic generated from that apartment building onto that single-family residential area and that is an issue the traffic analysis will have to look at. Councilmember Evans stated, if he understood, the only reason we are being asked to approve this project is because they say it is money, he could understand the developers standpoint for money, but he is also throwing in another element that has not been considered todate and that is a development south of this location. He asked the Planning Director, when the Planning Commission looked at this, was there ever any discussion of a potential commercial site presented to them. The Planning Director replied, none that he was aware of. 4W Councilmember Evans asked if there had ever been any discussion about a potential development to the south. The Planning Director replied he believes there had been some discussion regarding a Phase II type of development back there. Councilmember Evans asked if it was discussed when it was initially brought before the Planning Commission. The Planning Director replied he did not feel he could appropriately answer that since he has not researched the records. Councilmember Evans stated he had a hard time not going along with the Planning Commission's decision, in light of the information of the potential development that will bring money into them. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 15 Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she does not consider the financial impact great enough that she would want the commercial structure on the front. She stated she appreciated the realignment of the driveway and felt it showed much better planning than was originally in place. Therefore, she does not feel the commercial structure would be a benefit to the City and was not sure that it could not be done away with in the project itself. Michael Lasley Mr. Lasley stated the revenues the City is going to get by CDS Engineering having 2 or 3 units back there is not going to be near the revenues the City is going to get with a commercial building. He stated the plan is a much cleaner plan and felt it satisfied all of the requirements. He stated the residents who have horses will have better access in getting their horse trailers through the proposed driveway. OAW Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she felt the 50,000 square foot building is not going to enhance that piece of property, and by not putting it in there is not going to damage this project that much; everything else shows greater insight than the original project. Mr. Lasley asked, then the original Conditional Use Permit could be built as is, "is that correct?" The Planning Director replied there are parking requirements that need to be met. The Planning Director stated one of his concerns, which he has told the applicant, is the fact that those entrance ways onto Reed Avenue, and also some pulling out of the existing structures that the residents are now in, may cause some problems that will cost some dollars to fix and 4 those will be required to be fixed prior to issuance of permit. Mr. Lasley stated he felt everyone wanted to do what was beneficial to the City. He thinks it is a good plan. Councilmember Grant asked if there was anyone in the audience who lives to the west of the parking lot and west of the commercial area? Mary Fitzgerald Ms. Fitzgerald stated as far as getting in and out with their 22317 Barton horse trailer, as long as they leave enough space she has no Road problem. She stated that all the Retirement Home project has brought, has been problems. She stated one problem being the trash that is being thrown around their property and people living on the construction site in little trailers, and it is also going to bring a lot more traffic. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 16 The City Attorney stated he would suggest she call the City if she sees anyone living on the construction premises. He also directed a statement to the applicant regarding a letter that was sent from someone in the applicant's office. It was a complaint that stated the applicant will be looking for compensation from the City for a taking of property, which meant to the City Attorney, an inverse condemnation threat, because of the access of the adjoining properties, which is one of the conditions. He felt it should be clarified at this time, whether or not, the applicant intended to proceed with that claim against the City. If the City drops the condition, Ms. Fitzgerald would not have access to the property and that was the approach the applicant was taking at that time. Ms. Fitzgerald stated that they have an easement which was put in when the property was sold originally. The City Attorney stated they need to get an answer from the applicant as to what their actions are going to be. Mr. Lasley stated that the applicant would not come back to the City for compensation. He stated that was probably a comment made in a heated situation when someone was upset with the way things had gone one. The City Attorney stated, never -the -less, the City is going to require some type of waiver before they approve this project. Mr. Lasley stated that if there is an easement on the property, the Title Report should say so and CDS Engineering would get back with the City after they check it out. Mayor Matteson asked if anyone else wanted to speak on this issue. No one responded. Mayor Matteson asked the Planning Director to briefly state why the Planning Commission rejected this project. The Planning Director stated the Planning Commission's concerns; the impact of traffic from the commercial structure; the project does not meet the zoning requirements regarding parking and the landscaping site layout was not approved. Council asked for clarification on the zoning requirements for parking, and the Planning Director clarified the requirements. Mayor asked what was Council's desire. Councilmember Evans asked the developer, this alignment that is being proposed tonight will not be built if this is not approved, you will go back to the original alignment that was presented in the first project, "is that not correct." Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 17 Mr. Lasley replied, he felt they would have to go back to as close to the original as they could. There would be no reason for them to eat up the property behind; they would like to have the parking as close to the Retirement facility as they could. Councilmember Evans stated that they could only take a look at how the land is going to be utilized, understanding the potential development that will go on a parcel and because of that he could not support the developers position. CC-87-198 Motion by Councilmember Evans, second by Councilmember Shirley, ALL AYES, to adopt the resolution upholding the Planning Commission's SAR board denial of SA-87-8. Mayor Matteson opened for discussion and stated his only problem was the width of the street, if it was wider, it would be a good project. Councilmember Grant stated he basically supported the idea of a small commercial development there, but unfortunately the geography is going to cause him to vote for this motion. Councilmember Shirley stated she liked the idea of putting a commercial building in the front, but a 5,000 square feet building is too large; she did not like the commercial site on the property line. Mayor Matteson said what they are trying to say to them is the way the project is presented, is not acceptable. Mr. Lasley asked if commercial building 4 accept this?" they brought this back to Council and the was smaller, "you might be willing to Councilmember Shirley replied, "yes." The Planning Director asked for clarification regarding Planning Commission was opposed to a commercial structure and Council voting to uphold the denial of the project basically agreed with that motion. He stated, if you wish to have it come back as a revised plan without having the applicant start over again, it should be put back to the Planning Commission and not an actual denial; that would allow the Planning Commission direction. CC-87-199 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Shirley, that the applicant have the opportunity to redesign the commercial part of that building and redesign that area and bring it back to the Planning Commission as a revised unit. Motion carried with Councilmember Evans and Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, voting NOE. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 18 PUBLIC HEARING Appeal of Councilmember Shirley stated because of a conflict of interest, Planning she would not participate in this discussion. Commission's denial of The Planning Director read the staff report regarding the TMP-87-5 Planning Commission's denial of TMP-87-5 (C.G. Engineering). (C.G. Engineering) He proceeded over to the map of the proposed parcel and pointed on the map the proposed area. David Barakian Mr. Barakian pointed out on the zoning map the proposed was submitted to 2627 South parcel. He stated originally when this map Planning Commission, it contained 4 parcels. At that time, Waterman Avenue San Bernardino the elt the Planning Commission, as well as the property owners, f it was too many parcels for this piece of land and 2 would be acceptable. Upon the continuance of this item at the August 17, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting, the property owner, in an attempt to compromise on the lot size, resubmitted an application containing 3 lots. He stated the proposed grading of these 3 lots would be done in the same acceptable engineering fashion as the existing houses are on existing, already approved, subdivisions under the R-1 zoning. These subdivisions surround the property in question along the east/west street through Van Buren and other east/west streets in the City. He stated they are willing to comply with all the conditions presented to them for development of this site. Mayor Matteson asked if anyone wanted to speak on this issue. Steve Fox Mr. Fox stated he was the owner of this property and stated he 382 E.Bonnieview has owned it since 1981. He stated he had an original map in Rialto to divide this into two lots. When he entered into it, the property was zoned A-1 and he believed he was going to be able 4, to have horses and that they were going to be able to go through the California Water Quality Control for septic tanks because of the cost of bringing up the sewer. When he actually got into it, the zoning was changed to R-1. Therefore, the cost of developing two lots was prohibited. He hoped Council would uphold the laws for the zoning. He stated the lots are not small, they are all a 1/3 of an acre or more. He stated they have tried in every way to satisfy the conditions as much as they could. Michael Stein Mr. Stein presented Council with some pictures he wanted them 12711 Blue Mt. to review. He stated the issue was grading and that is why he Court and the other neighbors on Blue Mt. Court are opposed to it. He feared the water shed. Vincent Smith Mr. Smith stated he owned the 9-acre parcel that borders this 22873 Pico St. property on Pico. He stated his concern was the density of this lot. He stated to reduce that to anything less than a split of the property is detrimental to their property. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 19 Dennis Kidd Mr. Kidd stated he is opposed to this project because he feels 22874 Pico St. it will be out -of -character with other parcels. He stated they should keep that area a low -density area because of the problems with flooding. Councilmember Grant stated he concurred with the Planning Commission about the easterly sloped lot. CC-7-200 Motion by Councilmember Grant, second by Mayor Matteson, to adopt the resolution upholding the Planning Commission's denial of this project. Motion carried with 1 abstension from Councilmember Shirley. Item 5-A.3(a) Mayor Matteson carried Council back to Item 5-A.3(a) and asked if there was any discussion regarding Minutes from the Historical and Cultural Committee. There was no discussion. COUNCIL REPORT Item 5-B Councilmember Evans stated he had a question for the Assistant Councilmember City Manager regarding the capitol improvements projects Evans time -line update and stated he had asked for that about a month ago. He asked what the status was, specifically, regarding the upgrading of the signalization at Barton Road and Mt. Vernon (turning movements). The Assistant City Manager replied he would be in communication with the City Manager tomorrow and would bring that to his attention. A representative from the City Engineer's Office stated the improvements on the signalization would start in about 30 days. The Assistant City Manager stated his biggest hang-up on that project is the right-of-way acquisition. Councilmember Evans stated he thought that was already taken care of. The Assistant City Manager replied, to the best of his knowledge, it had not been. He stated it is a matter of the City okaying the free -of -charge versus having to pay the individual for the property. He stated the last he had heard from Joe Ki.cak's office was that consideration was being made to dedicate it to the City free -of -charge. Councilmember Evans asked the City Attorney that, sometime back, there was some direction that if we did not get the dedication, legal action was going to be commenced. The City Attorney stated there was some discussion, not at the Council table, but individually, and in one closed session, of initiating action to take the condemnation. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 20 Councilmember Evans asked how long are we going to wait. The City Attorney replied, if you like, we will bring it back to you at the next Council meeting to have you initiate the action to take the property. The Assistant City Manager stated, right now the property is in escrow. Mayor Matteson requested an update be brought back to the next Council meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she hated to think that they were going to sit there and wait, with the dangerous situation at the intersection, which could be alleviated with a left -turn signal and wait for potential buyers and present owners to battle this out in court. Let's get on with this. Councilmember Shirley asked if they are in litigation and we move to take it, are we going to be able to do so. The City Attorney replied, "yes." Friends of the Councilmember Grant congratulated the Friends of the Library Library for a very successful, recent, book sale at City Hall. Councilmember Councilmember Grant also congratulated the Historical and Grant Cultural Committee for the very interested display in the foyer in this building, relating to our Sister City in Italy. He expressed his gratitude to Mrs. Ann Petta and Mrs. Viola Gratson, Chairman, of the Historical and Cultural Committee for the hard work she initiated in this display. He suggested that a letter from the Mayor to Mrs. Gratson expressing Council's appreciation should take place. He stated there should be some methodology for picking up the trash on the entrances and exits of our City, without members of Council having to approach staff to have it done. He asked if anything had been done about the filth that seems to prevail at Stater Bros. Shopping Center. He also mentioned the GTI Building and stated Council should be kept updated about the status of that building. He stated that he brought to the attention to the City Manager of the appearance of political signs in the City and stated we should make sure they are paying the required fees. Councilmember Grant stated that several years ago they discussed the possibility of having weekend staff at City Hall. He felt government should run seven -days a week. Events do not stop on Saturdays and Sundays and we should look into it. Councilmember Grant concurred with others regarding the meeting on October 20, 1987 on earthquake preparedness. Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 21 Councilmember Councilmember Evans stated we have a very serious problem with Evans Barton Road at the I-215 freeway. He requested staff to prepare a cost estimate as to how much it would cost if the City were to participate in widening the bridge across I-215, to be consistent with the street width of Barton Road. The Assistant City Manager replied they would be happy to. NEW BUSINESS Item 8-A The Assistant City Manager read the staff report relating to a resolution establishing a "No Parking Zone" on both sides of Grand Terrace Road. CC-87-201 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to adopt the resolution establishing a 60 "No Parking Zone" on both sides of Grand Terrace Road. Item 8-B The Assistant City Manager read a staff report relating to the Volunteer Banquet Update and asked Council to select a date. Councilmember Grant recommended October 30, 1987. Mayor Matteson asked Council if anyone had any problem with that date. Everyone concurred with October 30, 1987. The Council meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Regular scheduled meeting to be held on Thursday, October 22, 1987, at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted: 4 Deputy City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor Council Minutes - 10/08/87 Page 22 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (A MEETING DATE: October 22, 1987 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT TRAINING/COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED 040 The Criminal Justice Training Center is presenting training in "Environmental Design" November 30 - December 4, at the Public Safety Center, 570 Bercut Dr., Sacramento, CA. The Crime Prevention Committee has voted to send the CSO for this training. The funding being provided by the committee. The training is offered twice a year and the CSO has been on a waiting list since last year. Approximate cost is $672.00 STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER TO ATTEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN TRAINING IN SACRAMENTO 4 41� ..1XIWO AGENDA ITEM * Jr5 to the Cr-i_me Preventi-on Committee with a recommendation so that the Crime Prcvent:Lon Comm-i.tLce may take i_t to the City Counsel. Korgan presented the proposed annual program shoeing what the Crrtme PrevcnL].on Off-i.cer's and the Committees goals are for the 87-88 term. Korgan reported that the Sheriffs Ucpar_tment paid to send her to the Santa Barbara C.C.P.O.A. Conference. Therefore, the Committee didn't have to supply the funds. There was a motion by Singley that the Committee provide up to and not to exceed $672.00 upon approval of the Committee for the Crime Prevention OAicer to attend the Environmental Design Training Seminar. The motion was second by Wright and carried with all I's. Korgan reported that she will be conducting the Essay Contest this year in October/November. There was a motion made by Singley that the Crime Prevention Committee fund up to and not to exceed $300.00 upon approval of the Committee for ,_rizes to the winners of the Essay Contest. The motion was second by Pace and carried with all I's. #,Tingley suggested that the Crime Prevention Officer look into purchasing Plc Gruff pins for future prizes. There was a motion by Singley to move the Crime Prevention Committee October meeting to the 5th of October due to the holiday. The motion was second by Wright and carried with all I's. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. M CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PRF VI NTION COMMITTEE f;L(.;E1!.'_ MINUTES OF' MI=;STING HEILD SEI)TEMBER 14 , 1987 �;I I i `ii }u�i�l• i � 1 Jim SLngl_e\-, Treasurer, called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m. The treasurer, Singley had no report. There was a motion made by Singley to by-pass the agenda. Butle= secon� .,ie motion and the motion was carried with all I's. Tom Semph's resignation was presented to the committee. 60Phe Crime Prevention Officer, Sharon Korgan reported that the parks and recreation meeting that she and Ralph were to attend tonight had been cancelled. However, Barbara Conley, the committees chairman will speak at our meeting tonight. Barbara asked the Crime Prevention Committee for their help. She would like to see both committees wort: hand in had on the following problem _.yeas : 1. Terrace Hills Park - vandelizim, possible drug dealinc, 4 the noise problem and littering. Barbara stated that the "We Tip" program had not worked in the oast due to the fact that in order to collect the reward, the person report rna the crime must testify and the criminal must be prosecuted. Korgan suggested that the Parks and Recreation committee submitt -•--i t ten documentation supporting in detail all occurances so that the Crime e Committee can act on them at once. Singley suggested maybe the Committees could design a fence or rc Oarr_jor, more Iirjhts etc. t-o make the park Less of an attract -on to trouble makers. Singley also suggested that Barbara Conley take these ideas back -- per committee and then the Parks and Recreation Cormittee coulc come: G LAW ENFORCEMENT NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING AND EDUCATION SYSTEM, INC. 570 Bercut Drive October 13, 1987 Public Safety Center Suite C Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 441-7243 Sharon Korgan San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Leslie A Clark Director (916) 441-7243 Karl B Hutchinson Program Coordinator (916)441-7243 W F Waddle Academy Coordinator (916) 441-1966 Dear Sharon: 11'lii.s l.� t: c�.r .i.s to Conf.i.r_;n y(-)iir i-( . r. vation 'or uur ?1I)VI��IC 1?U C:RINT; PREVENTION, ENVU-10 lMENiA1. I)1;SI TN (.ottrse, scheduled f,)r November 30 I)e6ember 4 1987.M_ Classes are Monday through Friday, 0800 hours to 1700 hours. 4 There is a course fee of $36.00. Enclosed is a map to our Center along with motel information. These motels provide us with a discount rate and are within walking distance of the Center. * If the personnel. listed below cannot attend this course, please"notify the Center at (916) 441-7243. Sincerely, LES LTE A. CLARY. DIRECTOR Diana Pratt Secretary LAC : dp * Sharon Korgan and One additional space. I Sacramento Citv College LAW ENFORCEMENT NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING AND EDUCATION SYSTEM, INC. Public Safety Center 570 Bercut Drive Suite C Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 441-724J ADVANCED CRIME PREVENTION, ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN This 40-hour course is offered to law enforcement officers who have primary crime prevention duties, and have been assigned the task of reviewing the impact'of all plans submitted for new or additional construction within their jurisdictions. TAK course will pick up where the exposure to the concept of crime prevention through environmental design left off in the basic 80 hour course. It will provide the officers with the basic knowledge and skills necessary to effectively function in this area. Topics covered include introduction and: Philosophy Blueprint Reading & Terminology Legislation Environmental Impact Reports Visibility, Streets & Sidewalks, Parks & Open Space Residential Developments Commercial & Industrial Development The Planning Process Lighting, Architectural Design Concepts & Defensible Space This course will conclude with a Design Role Playing Workshop in which the class will be divided into two groups to design two cities on table top open space maps, and in so doing must confront and deal with all of the other political, governmental and private interests tha-m--must be dealt with when law enforcement attempts to impact community design. This co may also be appropriate for city and county planners to attend along with crime prevention officers. SCHEDULE: HOURS: LOCATION: CREDIT: FEE: CERTIFICATION: EQUIPMENT: Session #1: August 24 - 28, 1987 Session #2: November 30 - December 4, 1987 Session #3: March 7 - 11, 1988 Session #4: June 6 - 10, 1988 40 hours (5 days) 0800 - 1700 hours Sacramento Public Safety Training Center 570 Bercut Drive, Sacramento, CA 95814 Two (2) Units of Credit - Sacramento City College Materials $26.00; Tuition $10.00; Non -Resident (out-of-state) $86.00 per unit. Total out-of-state cost for course is $198.00. P.O.S.T. Plan IV Please bring calculator and ruler to class. Sacramento City College c) K'RAMENTO U MOTELS WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF THE CENTER: 1. DISCOVERY MOTOR INN 350 Bercut Drive (916) 442-6971 2. DAYS INN 200 Jibboom Street (916) 448-8100 * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7A 3. SANDMAN MOTEL 236 Jibboom Street (916) 443-6515 ********************** 4. ALL STAR BUDGET INNS 227 Jibboom Street (916) 441-0733 * At DISCOVERY MOTOR INN you may request a room at the front. (800) 952-5516 C R A ITEM( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE: 9/30/87 STAFFREPORT COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: OCT 2 2 1987 SUBJECT Approval of Final Parcel Map 10710 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED x Tentative Parcel Map 10710 located on Glendora Drive, was recently approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. All of the conditions of approval for the subject map have been satisfied. STAFF RECOMMENDS: That the City Council grant final approval to Parcel Map 10710. �h JK:wl 21 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4, 3F DATE: 10/14/87 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT FUNDING REQUIRED t O FUNDING REQUIRED XX COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: 10/22/87 The attached Final Tract Map 13364, previously received approval as a Tentative Map by both the Planning Commission and City Council. All of the conditions of approval of subject Tentative Map have been met, and/or being bonded. Following agreements and bonds are being presented to the City Council for your consideration and acceptance: A. Agreements 1. Street and Storm Drain Improvements 2. Water System Improvements 3. Sanitary Sewer 4 4. Landscaping B. Bonds 1. (a) Street and Storm Drain, Performance $260,000.00 (b) Street and Storm Drain, Material & Labor 130,000.00 2. (a) Water System, Performance 56,000.00 (b) Water System, Material & Labor 28,000.00 3. (a) Sanitary Sewer, Performance 60,000.00 (b) Sanitary Sewer, Material & Labor 30,000.00 4. Landscaping Bond 15,000.00 5. Grading Bond 32,000.00 STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT CITY COUNCIL: 1. Approve the agreements presented and authorize the Mayor to sign these agreements. 2. Accept the bonds. 3. Approve the Final Tract Map 13364. JK :wl COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM t � CG STREETS AND STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of September , 1987, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, hereinafter called "City" and TERRACE PINES hereinafter called "Owner". DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited Partnership WITNESSETH FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights —of —way offered for dedication in Tract No. 13364 , hereby agrees at his its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner all work and improvements, in said_Tract, according to Plans and Profiles approved and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, Profiles, Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by the City Council. That the estimated cost of said work and impprovements is the sum of two hundred and sixty thousand Dollars $(260,-000.00 ) SECOND: The City, the City Engineer and all officers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for anv loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof; for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for the injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by him; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property of the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City, the City Engineer and all officers and employees of the City from all suits, or actions of�e�,ery name, kind, or description brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages .received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed that said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights —of —way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said Council, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective or dangerous condition existent on said rights —of —way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. That it is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, and proposed, and proposed road rights —of —way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Strut System and said Owner may, with approval of the City Engineer, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. And the Owner hereby agrees to pay for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professional Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit-, (2) a bond be in one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State or Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Said bonds shall be in the amounts and for the following purposes: (a) an amount equal to the total estimated cost of the improvement, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the Agreement, and (b) an additional amount equal to AN WATER SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of September , 1987, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, hereinafter called "CITY" and TERRACE PINES hereinafter called "Owner." DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited Partnership WTTNFC4FTP- FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -or -way offered for dedication in Tract No. 13364 , hereby agreeds at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanline manner a water system in said Tract, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the office of Riverside Highland Water Company are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said Riverside Highland Water Company, and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Riverside Highland Water Company. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of fifty six thousand Dollars ($ 56,000.00 ), SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for the injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City and all officers and employees of the City, from all suits or actions of every name, kind or description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said City, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective or dangerous condition existent on said rights -of -way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. That is is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, any proposed road rights -of -way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Road System and said Owner may, with approval of the proper City representatives, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. And the Owner hereby agrees to pay for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State or Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Said bonds shall be in the amount and for the following purposes: (a) an amount equal to the total estimated cost of improvements, conditoned upon the faithful performance of the Agreement, and (b) an additional amount equal to one-half the total estimated cost of the improvement securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them for the improvements. Should the sureties on said bond , or either of them, become insufficient, said Owner agrees to renew said bond with good and sufficient sureties, within ten days after receiving notice SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,ppr.mbp , 1987, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, hereinafter called "CITY' and TERRACE PINES hereinafter called. "Owner." DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited Partnership L1T'PXTFQQFTTJ FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council of the dedications offered on the final map and its approval of such Final Map of that certain tract known as Tract No. 13364 , hereby agrees at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner a sanitary sewer system in said Tract, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Engineer are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted by the That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of sixty thousand Dollars ($ 60,000.00 )• SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City, shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for any injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City, and all officers and employees of the City, from all suits or actions of every name, kind of description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed that said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the dedications offered on such Final Map of said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by said Council give good and adequate warning of each and every dangerous condition caused by the construction of said improvements, and will protect the travelling public therefrom. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, State of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State or Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Said bonds shall be in the amounts and for the following purposes: (a) an amount equal to the total estimated cost of the improvements, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the Agreement, and (b) an additional amount equal to one-half the total estimated cost of the improvement securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them for the improvements. Should the sureties on said bonds, or either of them, become insufficient, said Owner agrees to renew said bonds with good and sufficient sureties, within ten days after receiving notice that said sureties are insufficient. Bonds as herein required shall remain in full force and effect until all work is completed and accepted by the City. P_(3) LANDSCAPING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of Sept. , 1987 , by and between the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, hereinafter called "City" and TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., hereinafter called "Owner". a California Limited Partnership T.JTTM'P Q QFTA FIRST: That the Owner for and in consideration of the acceptance by the City Council or the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in Tract No. 13364 hereby agrees at its own cost and expense, to furnish all equipment, labor, and material necessary, and before the expiration of two years from the date hereof, to perform and to complete in a good and workmanlike manner all landscaping and installation of irrigation system in said Tract, according to approved Plans and Standard Drawings and Specifications, and to do all the work incidental thereto, which said Plans, and Standard Drawings and Specifications are on file in the Office of the Planning Director are hereby made a part of this Agreement. That said work and improvements shall be done under the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of said City and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted by the City Council. That the estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of fifteen thousand Dollars ($15,000.00 )• SECOND: The City and all officers and employees of the City shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work, or for any injury to any person or persons, either workmen or anyone employed by them; against all of which injuries or damages to persons and property the Owner or his contractor having far control over such work must properly guard. THIRD: The Owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City and all officers and employees of the City from all suits or actions of every name, kind of description, brought for, or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the Owner, his contractor, or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the work required hereunder. FOURTH: It is further agreed said Owner will at all times from the acceptance by the City Council of the public rights -of -way offered for dedication in said Tract, up to the completion by the Owner and acceptance of said work and improvements by the City, give good and adequate warning to the travelling public of each and every defective or dangerous condition existent on said rights -of -way and will protect the travelling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. That it is understood and agreed that until the completion of all the improvements herein agreed to be performed, or proposed road rights -of -way not accepted as improved shall not be accepted into the City hIaintained Road System and said Owner may, with approval of the proper City representatives, close all or a portion of any street whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the travelling public during the making of the improvements herein agreed to be made. The Owner hereby agrees to pay for such inspection of the work and improvements as may be required by the City. FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, that the Owner will furnish two good and sufficient bonds in accordance with Section 11612, Business and Professions Code, Stale of California. Such bonds may be in one or more of the following forms: (1) a cash deposit, (2) a bond by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties, or (3) an instrument of credit from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the State of Federal Government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as above set forth. Said bonds shall be in the amounts and for the following purposes: (a) an amount equal to the total estimated cost of the improvement, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the Agreement, and (b) an additional amount equal to one-half the total estimated cost of the improvement securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or r��riu wU: y�J.'U1L:� Premium: $5,200.00 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION (ROAD) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of two hundred and sixty thousand Dollars ($ 260,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presenLs. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (X) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the improvement of the streets and easements offered for dedication on the Final Map of Subdivision Tract No. 13364 or to be improved in connection with said Subdivision and whereas this Bond is required by said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed there under or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this Nth day of September 19_�y. TERRACE ,WNS DEVELOPMENT CO., a Califo 6ia invited t?!Pership DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY r ipa1 Surety �" am n, ra artner rincippal Attorney -in -fact Richard E. Sritton, General Partner David C. Banfer NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans, and Specifications. 6(►) (a) Bond No: 951612S Premium: incl in performance MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND (ROAD) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnershi as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) far organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of one hundred and thirty thousand Dollars ($ 130,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bond ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (x) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the improvement of the streets and easements offered for dedication on the Final Map of Subdivision Tract No. 13364 or to be improved in connection with said Subdivision and whereas this Bond is required by said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to an amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies, and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all cost incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 30th day ofSeptember1937—. TERRA PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a Cal odnia Limite rtnership DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY jt nci „ Surety m L. mn ueneral rartner • A Principal Attorney -in -fact Richard E. Britton, General Partner David C. Banfer NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans, and Specifications. R(2) ( b) t)ona No: y71ol�J Premium: $1,120.00 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION Water KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of fifty six thousand Dollars ($56,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The conditions of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (x) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Tract 13364 , as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or. Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its �•,� obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 30th r day of September 1987. i m u a entra artner �-- Principal Attorney -in -fact Richard E. Britton, General Partner David C. Banfer NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. Bond No: 951613S Premium: incl in performance MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Water THAT ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, _ TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company organized and existing under the laws of the State of California Ow and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of twenty eight thousand Dollars ($ 28,000.00 ) lawful well and truly to be made, executors, successors and presents. money of the United States for we bind ourselves, our heirs, assigns, jointly and severally, the payment of which, administrators, firmly and by these The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (x) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Tract13364 , as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to an amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies, and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this Ot day of September 1987—. TER CE INES DEVELO NT CO., a C if n'mited hip Z/ DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY F" L. ,,Iakrez n; General Partner Principal Richard E. Britton, General Partner NOTE: Surety Attorney -in -fact David C. Banfer Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. Bond No: 951614C Premium: $1,200 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION Sanitary Sewers KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) a, organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Grand Terrace , State of California, in the just and full sum of sixty thousand Dollars ($ 60,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ha entered into or are about to enter into the annexed agree- ment with the City of Grand Terrace , pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a sanitary sewer system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with plans and speci- fications for Tract 13364 , as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said agreement. 4, NOW THEREFORE, if the said principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agree- ment or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the plans or specifications attached to said agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the agreement or to the work or improvements or to the plans or specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 30th day of September 19 87 TERRACE PAVES DEVELOPMENT CO., a Califopflia Limited Partnership Pr ncipa _, I P DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY Surety Z, /Ktl-- By --�, Mauerhan, Attorney -in -fact artner David C. Banfer Richard E. Britton, General Partner NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to agreement, plans and specifications. SB 6/16/76 6 3(A ) Bond No: 95161LIS Premium: incl in performance MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Sanitary Sewers KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of (-a1ifnrnia thr and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of thirty thousand Dollars ($ 30,000.00 ) lawful money of the United States for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (x) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a sanitary sewer system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Tract 13364 , as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal or the subcontractors of said Principal shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or use of implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the said Surety will pay the same to any amount not exceeding the sum above specified in this Bond, and in case suit is brought upon this Bond, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. This Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Article 2 of Chapter 2 of Title 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, and all such persons, companies, and corporations and their assigns shall have a right of action in any suit brought upon this Bond. And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. Wan 'ITNESS OUR HANDS this Oth day of September 19� TOMES DEVEL MENT CO., a Cinvited S�Vship DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY Surety Wi"m L,/�M�aan, �heral Partner Richard �ri�cig l General Partner Attorney -in -fact ri on, David C. Banfer NOTE: Acknowledgments of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bonds must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. g3(8) 1',Olid Nf):1P)IOI(i.', Premium: $300.00 BOND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Owners) Partnership as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of California _ and authorized to act as Surety in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound into the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, State of California, in the just and full sum of fifteen thousand Dollars ($15,000.00 ), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly and by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has entered into or (x) is about to enter into the annexed Agreement with the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, for the construction of a water system and all appurtenances thereto, in accordance with Plans and Specifications for Tract 13364 , as approved and on file with said City in connection with the execution of said Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall and truly do and perform all of the covenants and obligations of said Agreement on its part to be done and performed at the times and in the manner specified therein, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. And the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the Plans or Specifications attached to said Agreement shall in any wise affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or improvements or to the Plans or Specifications. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. ITNESS OUR HANDS this 30th day of September 19_�Y. TER INES DEVEMENT CO_, a/, L./;24�an; general Partner Principal Richard E. Britton, General Partner DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY Surety 4 Attorney -in- a c— David C. Banfer NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. Bond must be attached to Agreement, Plans and Specifications. 64 Bond No: 91,1515S Premium: $640.00 li GRADING PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a California Limited (Permittee) Partnershio as Principal, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Bonding Company) organized and existing under the laws of the State of held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, in the just and full sum of thirty two thousand ($ 32,000.00 ), lawful money of the United Stat which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severa presents. California, as Surety, are State of California, Dollars s, for the payment of ur heirs, administrators, ly, firmly and by these The conditions of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas said Principal ( ) has filed or (x) is about to file with the City of Grand Terrace an application for a permit to perform excavation or fill work, or both, more specifically described in the application for the Grading Permit, upon real property owned by said Principal known as Tract No. 13364 NOW THEREFORE, if the above named Principal shall well and truly comply with all the requirements of said Agreement, and if all of the work required to be done complies with all of the terms and conditions of the Grading Permit for excavation or fill or both to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and is completed within the time limit specified in said Grading Permit, then this obligation shall be void and of no effect; otherwise it shall. be and remain in fu.11 f'uice rind effect. The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Permit or to the work or improvements to be performed thereunder or to the grading plans attached to said Permit shall in any wise affect the obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, at erati_on or additions to the terms of the Permit or to the work or improvements or to the plans. In the event suit is brought upon this Bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the Court. WITNESS OUR HANDS THIS Kth DAY OF September , 19-8-7. TERRACE PINES DEVELOPMENT CO., a Californi Limited Partnership Princ* a Wi liam L. )`Mauer an, Gen ral Partnership Principal. Ricrara,'T%. 13TIELon, 'eneral I tnership DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY Surety By:David C. Banfer, Attorney -in -Fact NOTE: Acknowledgements of execution by Principals and Surety must be attached. City Of Grand Terrace p.m. Crime Prevention Committee Minutes of Meeting Held October 5, 1987 Buchwalter, Committee Chairman, called the meeting to order at 6:00 The following notation is to be made a part of these minutes: The contest mentioned in the 9/14/87 minutes; is the Poster and Essay Contest which is being organized by the Crime Prevention Officer, Sharon Korgan. There was a motion made by Buchwalter that the Committee accept and approve the minutes of the meetings held 8/10/87 and 9/14/87 as submitted. The motion was second by Wright and carried with all I's. The minutes shall reflect that Jamie Lynn Butler has consented to tem- porarily take care of the secretarial duties of the Committee until the Committee receives official word from Bailes regarding his status as a Com- mtee member. The Treasurer, Singley gave a detailed report. (See attached Report) There was a motion made by Singley to accept and approve the treasurer's `%.report as submitted. Wright second the motion and the motion carried with all I's. There was a recommendation by Wright that the Committee allocate one (1) of the twelve (12) Mc Gruff Dolls ordered (three (3) of the twelve (12) were not previously allocated as the dolls must be ordered no less that: a dozen at a time) to the Crime Busters, to be used as a Crime Buster of the Month prize. The recommendation was second by Singley and carried with all I's. There was a motion made by Wright that the Committee allocate $40.00 to the Crime Busters in the event they do not receive a donation of soda and ice for the Halloween Carnival Fund Raiser. The motion was second by DW!OL.AGENDA ITEM *54'��A� Singley'and carried with all I's. Singley advised Butler to get an appraisal on the purchase of a Banner for the Crime Busters and submitt the cost to the Committee at their next meeting. The Committee advised the secretary to issue a suitable thank -you letter to the Lions Club for their donation of $500. to the Crime Busters Jr. Deputy Club. Korgan, Crime Prevention Officer, reported she conducted a special drug program/neighborhood watch for a group of 25. Detective Gilbreth also 010- ended the meeting with her. The last three (3) neighborhood watch programs have had strong interest, and she is hoping to re -activate all of the neighbor- hood watch participants now that summer is over. The Crime Prevention Officer and Singley are working on up -dating the neighborhood watch mailing lists. Korgan also did a special business watch program for Sweet Nothings Yogert Shop since their robbery. And she will do one for the Merry Mouse also , they were also robbed. to The Crime Prevention Officer will be organizing and conducting two (2) major seminars with special guest speakers. The first seminar will be Business Watch, Monday, October 19th at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. .4k% The second seminar will be Earthquake Preparedness, Tuesday, October 20th, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Refreshments and hand-out material will be provided at both seminars. Korgan did report to City Council at their last meeting at which time she submitted the Crime Prevention Officer and Crime Prevention Committee program goals for the 87-88 term. Korgan met with all three (3) schools regarding the Poster and Essay Contest assembly dates. One school has set a date and the other two (2) are not confirmed yet. Korgan also met with the new principal at Terrace View. The principal has indicated that she would like Sharon to do a presentation to the schools instructors with the puppets and the Talking Car.. The principal also wants to include the lst, 2nd, and 3rd graders in the Poster and Essay Contest. Korgan and Bill Thurlow are building and organizing a Halloween Safety skit with a set and costumes. They are to be ready to do a show for the Crime Busters and for the schools. The City Council has agreed to pick-up the expenses for the plaques for the winners of the Poster and Essay Contest. Korgan requested ideas from the Committee for other prizes for the #Ohtest. She has ordered certificates for the winners. It was suggested that the new Pizza Parlor, Dominos be contacted as well as Great Gaspy for prize donations. Korgan reported everything on the 87-88 goal list has now been activated. Buchwalter reported that he attended the Parks and Recreation Committee's last meeting. He stated that Barbara Conley, the Parks and Recreation Com- mittee Chairman is aware that the Citizens Patrol will be activated in the near future. Buchwalter also reminded the Parks and Recreation Committee please send written documentation reporting the De Berry Park problems to the Crime Prevention Committee. There was a motion made by Singley that the Crime Prevention Committee secretary send a letter requesting special patrol of at least three (3) times per shift of the De Berry Park and of California Skate Grand Terrace. The letter is to also request feed -back from the Sheriff's Dept. regarding these two (2) special patrol requests. Copies of the letter are to be sent to City Council, Parks and Recreation Committee, Crime Prevention Committee and California Skate owners- The motion was second by Wright and carried with all I ' s . Buchwalter directed the secretary to send a memo to the Parks and Re- creation Committee to state the Crime Prevention Committee has addressed the De Berry Park problem and has appealed to the Sheriff's Dept. for special patrol and feed -back as to the result of the special patrol, behond that our Committee cannot come up with a solution but, will continue to work with the Parks and Recreation Committee to find solutions. The Crime Prevention officer reported she will be doing an assembly at Terrace View School, Thursday November 5th at 2:30 p.m. for the Poster and Essay Contest. Buchwalter requested that the minutes reflect that Tom Semphs resignation was officially accepted at the 9/14/87 meeting. There was a motion made by Wright to tenatively accept and approve 87-88 program schedule as submitted by the Crime Prevention officer with more specifics to be added later. The motion was second by Butler and carried with all I's. There was a motion made by Singley that if a Crime Prevention Committee member misses three (3) consecutive meetings a letter will be sent to that member stating that at the next Crime Prevention Committee meeting the in- dividual will be listed on the agenda for termination of membership. If the member wishes to address the Committee they are to be present at the #4W:ting. The motion was second by Wright and carried with all I's. The Committee advised Singley to draft the above letter. The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Barbara Conley, Lennie Frost, Louis Galvez, Dick Rollins, Dave Widor CITY STAFF PRESENT: Randall Anstine, Renee McCarthy GUESTS: Ralph Buchwalter, Councilman Dennis Evans, Barney Karger, Councilwoman Barbara Phennighausen, Chuck Vahovek, 4 CALL TO ORDER: 7:qO PM by Chairman Conley ITEMS 1. Minutes of the August 3, 1387 meeting were reviewed and upon a motion by Louis Galvez and seconded by Lennie Frost approved by unanimous vote. 2. PARK VANDALISM/CRIME PREUENTION--Chairman Conley attended the Sept.13 Crime Prevention Committee to request their cooperation in dealing with the teenage traffic and vandalism at Terrace Hills Community Park. Chairman Conley suggested a representative of the CPC attend the next P&R meeting to discuss their intent for action. Ralph Buchwalter attended the P& R meeting to update the Committee on the Crime Prevention Committee intentions. A formal letter from the P & R Committee outlining the problem was requested to be directed to the CPC. At this time the CPC had no formalized plan of action. The CPC in turn invited representatives from the P & R Committee to attend their next meeting when the subject will be brought up for CPC review. Coucilwoman Pfennighausen stated that the City of Grand Terrace's Sheriffs Officers contract calls for 2 officers M-F and 2 officers on swing W-S, which is attempting to ease the problems in the City and the Park. 3. SNACKBAR--Chuck Vahovek, General Contractor was present to discuss how the Snackbar could be finished. Much debate was centered around who had the responsibility to authorize further work on the unit. Councilpersons Evans and Pfennighausen reiterated that the Coucil feels the snackbar has gone too far to stand still and that this Committee should continue to attempt to GUUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 5A5a) complete unit. Chuck described his plan of action to include re -drawing the snackbar plans to accurately depict cabinets, etc inside, adhering to as much as possible the County restrictions while maintaining that this is not a snackbar in the true sense of the word but rather a "Storage" place for the clubs. Randall Anstine stated for the record that the County Health Department should be contacted and made aware of any and all changes/progress of the snackbar. At the next P & R meeting a finish schedule and estimated financial report will be submitted detailing the completion of the snackbar. 3. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/PARKS--Planning Director varbalized through Chairman Conley that the Consultant has not formalized any difinitives to him or on paper to be submitted to this Committee. He did acknowledge however that the Consultant did agree with the Committee report in the fact that the City of Grand Terrace needs additional park land. Commissioner Rollins made the motion that a preliminary report from the Consultant be submitted for review by this committee prior to the preview and open discussions by the Residents of Grand Terrace. Seconded by Lennie Frost. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL 4. PARKS --Randall Anstine informed this Committee that a real estate agent has been attempting to contact, informally, the land owners of the targeted area for future parks as outlined by this Committee. At the presnt time, no land owners are interested in selling. S. IN-HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES --Due to the defunct PHI corporation and contract, as of Sept. 1, 1987 Grand Terrace now has an In-house Recreation Program with Renee McCathy now a City Employee. 6. GRIFFIN PARK DEVELOPMENT --City Council voted to accept development of Griffin Park Site to a passive park along the guidelines set forth by the homeowners' survey and report submitted by this Committee. Randall Anstine provided pavement, tree and park bench cost to Committee. Each Commissioner is to bring to the October meeting their plans as to how the park should be landscaped. 7. T.J.AUSTYN PARK SITE --Randall Anstine presented to this committee the revised T.J.Austyn park site for review. This proposal did meet all conditions as set forth by the City Council's original intent with T.J. Austyn. Commissioner Rollins made the motion we accept the reviewed proposal as set forth with reservations to the minimum amount of equipment listed on drawings. Seconded by Dave Widor. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. e. PICO PARK SITE UPDATE --Randall Anstine provided Committee with a Cost Estimate Status that did not include backstops or additional equipment for approximately 5gg3,729.00. (Report attached.) 4W Committee feels strongly that the Pico Park Site is land that we have NOW, that in order to develop this into a Fully utilized park, we forsee this being developed in phases. Commissioner Rollins made the motion we accept the Pico Park develop plan in phases. Commissioner Widor seconded. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. S. P & R PROGRAM/EXCURSIONS--Renee McCarthy informed Committee she is attempting to work with other surrounding cities P & R departments to cooperatively offer bus trips to various places. Due to the defunct PHI Contract, Renee McCarthy also mentioned that Grand Terrace is currently working on state licensing the thr after school programs. Commissioner Conley mentioned her concern over certain excursions (beach, raging waters) where young children (5-7 yr. olds) are allowed to go with an older brother or sister C12/13 year olds) on bus trips. She does not Feel that this is adequeate supervision in an extremely potentionally harmful environment. 10. CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING --Tuesday, December 8 was chosen as the 1987 date for the Grand Terrace Tree Lighting Ceremony. Renee McCarthy asked if any Commissioners has suggestions For Choirs. It was further agreed to maintain the program as outline in 1986, a choir, the firetruck arriving with Santa and friends but no band and to streamline the event as much as possible. Renee McCarthy will keep the Committee abreast of her agenda. 11. COMMISSIONERS STATUS --Ken Rinderhagen was contacted about his intentions on the Committee and stated he was no longer able to be a part of the Committee. Chuck Percy, due to medical reasons, is unable to continue as a Commisionner. Chuck Percy mentioned the desire to attend meetings when able. He is invited to do so. Commissioner Galvez also submitted his resignation as of Oct. 1, 1987 Cletter attached) to this Committee due to personal and work commitments. City Council will receive the following resignations and be requested to open the positions For the remainder of the Commissioners' terms. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED T❑ CITY COUNCIL. Meeting adjourned at 10:2S pm. NEXT MEETING: ❑CTnRFR S- 1987 AT 7:30 PM. Respectfully submitted Barbara M. Conley Chairman/Recording Secretary COMMISSION & COMITTEE REPOIDUR Q" COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ❑ctoher z2, 1997 DATE: ❑utnhor 12- 1997 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARKS AND _RECREATION 0► 0iI. r I J121 a Vlrcmr .:► PROBLEM: Duration of Parks & Recreation Monthly Committee Meeting. Due to the general consensus of all Commissioners, the Parks 9 Recreation Committee has voted to change the established monthly meeting time from 7:30 pm to 7:00 pm. This change is due in part to the duration of past meetings. This does not affect the current meeting date of the first Monday of the Month. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept change from 7:30 pm to 7:00 pm. 2. Do not accept change. OLuTION- By starting earlier the Parks & Recreation Committee may be able to complete its business by a normal hour. RFDHIRSTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL ANn/OR STAFF: Accept Alternative #1 above. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 5A 3 (b ) DATE: October 15, 1987 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: October 22, 1987 SUBJECT: PARK ACQUISITION FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the Council meeting of October 8, 1987, Councilman Evans requested that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion and possible action. DE: ma COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM r ,C:�b _4 (c ) COMMISSION & COMITTEE REPORTS' COUNCIL MEETING DATE: nntnhar 22, 1987 DATE: nrtnhar 12,1987 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARK AND RECREATION PROBLEM: Over budget for Tour de Terrace estimated expenditures. Facts: Due to misunderstanding, $2,000 was appropriated for the 1987 Tour de Terrace based on the assumption the Committee was estimating start-up cost only. Correct TOTAL estimated expenditures for the 1987 Tour de Terrace is $10,295.80. Total estimated Revenues is $13,700. Estimated 1987 Tour de Terrace Income Statement attached. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Appropriate an additional $10,296.00 for Tour de Terrace expenditures. 2. Do not appropriate additional funds. (Please be aware current expenditures surpass $3,000.) By appropriating additional funds the Expenditure Account (10-B07-221) will more accurately reflect cost associated with the 1987 Tour de Terrace. R QZST ❑ ACTION T❑ 8E TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: Accept Alternative #1 above. COUWAL AGENDA ITEM * 5A 5 Cd, 1987 TOUR de TERRACE INCOME STATEMENT REVENUES:ADULT 490 @$16 (pre -registered Riders) 78'f0.00 210 @$21 (Late registration) 4410.00 700 12250.00* Sponsorship Donations:Speedco-$100, Chief Auto-$150,Roadrunner-$100, Urgent Care-$100) EXPENSES:ADULT Printing Advertising Postage(Registration Flyers,etc.) T-Shirts for Riders 700*3.00 T-Shirts for Volunteers 60@3.00 Screen printing charge, etc. Waterbottles Food Trophies Pins (250) Awards Video Taping Finish Timer $175+.25 Ea Rider Professional Racers Free Style Riders/PA System Misc.(labels,poster boards,numbers helium,mileage,etc.) TOTAL EXPENSES -ADULT SUB -TOTAL PROFIT/LOSS-ADULT REVENUES:YOUTH 200*$5.00 EXPENSES:YOUTH T-Shirts 200@$2.50 Door Prizes Numbers Ribbons/Badges TOTAL EXPENSES -YOUTH SUB -TOTAL PROFIT/LOSS-YOUTH 600.00 520.00 475.00 2226.00 130.80 120.00 1115.00* 1000.00* 'f50.00 2`!5.00 75.00 500.00 350.00* 300.00 200.00 TOTAL PROFIT/LOSS-1987 TOUR de TERRACE 875.00 500.00 100.00 34.00 420.00 If50.00 12700.00* 9241. BO* 1000.0& 1054.00 *Cost may vary depending on ACTUAL number of registered riders. 345E . 20 -Ic -54.00 3404.2046� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: n .}nbar 22, 1987 DATE: notober 12_- 1987 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: PARKS AND RECREATION PROBLEM: Subsidy of 1/3 or $500 for Grand Terrace Soccer Club 4 for the use of Park lights duing their season. Facts Grand Terrace Soccer Club has requested, through this Committee, that the established policy of subsidizing 1/3 or $SOO worth of light tokens be continued for their 1987 season. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize 1/3 or $SOO subsidy for Grand Terrace Soccer Club. 2. Do not authorize 1/3 or $500 subsidy for Grand Terrace Soccer Club. SOLU?ION: The Committee feels it is a positive relationship between Parks 8 Recreation/City of Grand Terrace and athletic organizations/leagues to support, by way of a subsidy, leagues' lighting needs for the good of the residents of Grand Terrace. REpUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL ANO/OR STAFF: Accept Alternative #1 above. A3(e) OCT 2 2 1987 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE Minutes of October 5th 1987 Meeting The meeting was called to order at 7:10 PM by Chairman Viola Gratson. Those present were Irene Mason, Ann Petta, Hannah Laister, Pauline Grant, Kathy Harmon and Viola Gratson. Linda Laufer was absent. The minutes of the September 14th meeting were read and a motion was made to accept by Irene, seconded by Ann. The Treasurer's report was the same as for last month. Name tags have been ordered for Linda and Kathy. Viola is ordering ribbons for prizes for the Fair. Fair Publicity: Pauline will work on her assignments this week. Kathy and 6 Irene will do the same. Vi will have 35 posters made to put around town. A large sign is being made for the Community Center billboard. Viola will also get some balloons. The Committee decided to sell soft drinks in cans along with the items from the c ooking competition. We have had only two entries for the cooking competition so far so members will push this item. The mayor will be asked to make some of this chili. We will also sell coffee. Judges for the Competition: Tony Petta will be asked to NIC. It was decided on the following to be asked: Tom Schaab, Hugh Grant, Pat Nix, Clair Kidd, Dwight Winans. Dick Yost and Bill Fields will be alternates. Pauline will write letters of invitation to the above. The Committee discussed displaying the quilt to be raffled on a special table. Kathy will ask the Security Pacific Bank if we can display the quilt there before the Fair. New Business: Ann reminded us that the City birthday and Pot Luck is coming up. Viola will ask Tom Schaab for the date so that we can have flyers printed. We will decide what to buy, what to ask for, etc. at the next meeting. Kathy reported that the Girl Scouts are making a poster board, 3 x 4, for the Country Fair. We also need a plastic or other durable material banner type sign for the main table which will hold a fall display and scrapbooks. Kathy will look into this. Pauline donated pictures of the Vivenda Bridge dedication to our photo album. The next meeting will be November 2, 1987 at 7 PM. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 PM. Motion was made by Viola and seconded by Ann. Respectfully s ubmit ted, Hannah Laister, Secretary COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM a 6-A*) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 15 JULY 1987 ;he meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by J. Hodder. 4r Members present: E . Hodder V . Pfenneghausen M. Harris C. Williams Guests present: R. Anstine J. Olenick M.D. Minutes of the 15 ,.June 1987 meeting were presented and approved as read. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Dr. Jon Olenick, of the St. Bernardine Hospital, gave a presentation on personal and family emergency preparedness. Dr. Olenick is the chairman of the hospital's Disaster Committee, and as such he provides this type of instruction to hospital staff. His presentation stressed SELF HELP and included many helpful and informative tips. He indicated t}iat many injuries will be burn victims from fires following an earthquake, He also stressed the importance of families :paying close attention to personal cleanliness in the absence of utilities. The presentation was very interesting and well received by all members. LIAISON REPORT 1. ii. Anst:i.ne reported that. he had :spoken with the tent frame manufacturer, Mr. ;3antini, and ordered two frames at an approximate cost of $4500.00. These frames are labl<;d for ease of assembly. (Al 3tV-11 ) 2. Some csf t;ie hazard data has arrived, and letters which the. lt,y Rrigineer sent to the utility c•ornpanie:s Were provided. Ile j_ ale' t _ L.i-i(rt f 1.'c,ri l r.-ntrancl-e of hu-1 1ding 3 hav(, been peri orm� d.. 4 H Ai,stine. provided. :1 l i_:_t of coyitac•ts in surrounding communi ti eS involved iu eme;rgHncy c;rvic;es. This list will btu used to find out if �innther cnmmuniLy would be inl,ere-sted in sharing the cost of .having i.amily emergeri ;y 1.-)r(_pa r dne`: pamphlets produced. (Al #87-G11 :) I,.efurl:)ishing of the, storage container will be added to the work iist. (AI CDURCIL AGENDA ITEM #5A Oct) SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Communications: 1. V. Pfennighausen reported that the battery has been replaced in the emergency generator at building 3. The generator was successfully tested on 24 June 2. The damage to the high frequency antenna mast is not extensive and can. be corrected by re -running the guy wires. 3. All communications equipment to be purchased with fiscal '87 funds has been ordered. Emergency Operations Plan: 1. E. Luers was not :present at this meeting and the discussion of the base plan meeting state guidelines was tabled until the August regular meeting. Internal Procedures: 1.. Standard Operating Procedure 010-002, Modular Document Review and Approval was reviewed and comments taken. 2. Standard Operating Procedure #1.0-003, Release of Modular Documents was distributed for review and will be discussed at the August regular meeting. (AI #87-26) ACTION ITEM STATUS AI #87-11 R. Anstine contacted Mr. Santini and authorized the manufacture of two tent frames at the approximate cost of $4500.00, Closed. Al #87-12 -R. Anstine discussed the acquisition of -t.he city wide alarm system with the City Manager and he feels that since one vendor Had quoted a. price of $90 , 000 . 00 to $100 , 000 . 00 , that it was of questionable value and hard justification would be needed. TI-iJ4.s will be. discussed at t}lr August, regular meeting Open. Al #87-20 SOP 10-002 was reviewed and comments accepted fc,r, inclusion. Closed AI P87--_2_1List of contacts for other communities was provided b,. t Anstine. Closed. AI._ li87_=22 Request for action. submitted by J . Hodder to City Council to advertise opening caused by J. Tibbles moving his residence outside c,rand Terrace. Closed. AI #87 ,`l IOM submitted to R. Anstine from J. Hodder, requesting that the work crew clean and paint the storage container to minimise environmental impact., and to lubricate the doors. Closed. Al #87-24 Chamber notified that the committee's regular meeting night has changed to the third Monday of the month. Closed. AI #87-25 R. Anstine says two copies of the SOP document, will be sufficient for City Hall. Closed. NEW BUSINESS 1. No new business. ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. The next regular meeting will be on 17 August in building 3 at 7:00 pm. 2. R. Anstine announced that there will be an Earthquake Excercise Planning meeting at the end of the month. He will be attending. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at. 9:00 pm. Submitt,t-_-d by l Approved by: Eileen F. Hodder, Secretary James A. Hodder, Chairman '.grand Terrace Emergency Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee Operations Committee 3 DATE: 10/14/87 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X� MEETING DATE: October 22, 1987 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6B SUBJECT rnNSznFji gLECJFLC P1.AN_Dj-' EQ REST CITY DILLION PROJECT FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED. X l3AC' KGROU N D On July 25, 1985, the City Council. approved Phase I of Forest City Di.11on's j1t. Vernon Villas apartment project. Phase I contains 248 units and is located directly north of the proposed P1-iase II. On August 4, 1986, the Planning Commission denied the required approvals for Phase 11 (SP-86-1, CUP-86-3 and SA-86-6) and on August 14, 1986, the City Council also denied Phase II on appeal• One of the major issues which prompted the projects denial was the adoption of Ordinances #100 and #1.04 which changed minimum square footage and parking requirements for multi -family units. The applicant has since resubmitted Phase II with a Specific Plan (Attachment B) which comes closer to meeting the requirements of these Ordinances. At the time of the previous application a variance was also applied for and denied. Even though the proposed Specific Plan does not entirely meet the requirements of Ordinances #100 and #104, a variance is not necessary because the purpose of a Specific Plan is to allow the City and a developer to use site planning concepts and designs which may not be possible through the strict application of the conventional zoning regulations. This provides a method of producing a superior site design and overall project which is in conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Additionally, the City's General Plan requirement that a specific plan be required for any riiulti-family -project with 16 or more units should eliminate the need for subsequent approvals such as a separate conditional use permit and site and architectural review since these issues should all be considered during; review of the Specific flan. However, the Grand Terrace Zoning Ordnance is written in a manner that also requires these approvals in addi.tI- on to the approval of: a speci fic pl an. Before your Counci 1 tonight is a Specific Plan whicl1 will incorporate the Conditional Use Permit and the Site and Arc- hitectIIraI Review as part of the overall Specific flan. A single action may be taken by the City Council to approve the Specific Plan which includes the Conditional Use Permit and the Site and Architectural. Review. On September. 21, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended approval. of SP/CtiP-87-11 with conditions, these conditions are included in Appendix A of. Attachment B. DISCi1SSION Specific Plan Analysis_:_ Residential Units: The proposed Phase II is located on 19.46 acres and contains 156 one -bedroom units and 152 two-bedroorn units for a total of 308 apartments. The one -bedroom units contain approximately 670 square feet and the two -bedroom units contain either 860 square feet or 880 square feet. Each unit has either a patio or deck area and approximately 28 square feet of storage area. The units are clustered in two story buildings consisting of 8, 1.2, and 1.6 units. How the various size units are located in the buildings and the location of each building is shown on the Site Plan included in Appendix g of Attachment B. Each unit will have heating and or air-conditioning, water_ heater, dishwasher, disposal, built-in range, laundry hookups, carpet and window coverings. Parking/Circulation: The site plan provides 308 parking spaces located in detached garages and 344 open air parking spaces. Of the 344 open air spaces, 36 are to be designated as guest parking spaces. The location of the guest parking spaces have not been designated on the plan. The specific plan indicates that the open air spaces are a minimum of 9'xl9' in area. Interior circulation is provided by a private 24' street which runs around the perimeter of the project and intersects the project roughly dividing it into quadrants. There are two ingress and egress points for the project, one each located on Mt. Vernon Avenue and Canal Street. Each access point is located in accordance with the previous "master plan" for this area and are to be equipped with security gates located so that cars stopped for the gates will not extend in the public right-of-way. Open Space and Recreational Facilities: The project contains 42% of open space as defined by the City Zoning Ordinance (does not include structures, driveways or parking areas). Recreational facilities are to include two swimming pools and a spa, one 1/2 court basketball court, one sand volleyball court, a jogging trail, barbecue areas, an indoor lounge, a gym and meeting rooms. These areas are identified on Appendix B (Sheet 2) of Attachment B. Density: The project site consists of 19.46 acres (847,677 sq. ft.) of land and a proposed 308 residential units. This translates into a overall project density of 15.8 units per acre. This figure is comparable to the 15.8 approved for Phase I. General Plan Consistency: The City's current General Plan designation for this property is Medium Density Residential which allows a density of 9 plus units per acre. The General Plan also requires a specific plan for any development of 16 or more residential units which allows a variety of different densities for projects as long as they do not exceed the maximum density allowed by the relevant zoning designations. The subject property is currently zoned R-3 and does not have a maximum density as long as a Conditional Use Permit is obtained. Therefore, with the approval of SP/CUP 87-1 this project will be consistent with the current General Plan. REVIEWING AGENCIES COMMENTS Colton Unified School District: The specific plan indicates that the project will generate approximately 150 school age children which will attend District schools. The School District's comments included no objections to the project as long as the appropriate school fees are paid. Riverside Highland Water. Company: The specific plan states that the developer will be responsible for replacing the existing 6' water line in Mt. Vernon Avenue with a 12" line down to Barton Road. The Riverside Highland Water Company has indicated tliev are working with the developer on this project in connection with Phase I and says tliev have no other concerns. Department of. Environmental Health Services. This department has no comments other than requesting the plans for the swimming pools and spa be submitted to them for review prior to construction . Department of Transportation: This State agency mikes their standard commentthat mitigation measures should be included in the project to re1.ieve any traffic impacts created by the project. Such mitigation measures may include street improvements and signal lights i.f warranted. Building and Engineering Department: The City Engineer- has submitted several recommended conditions of approval for this project which are contained in the Planning Commission Resolution included in Appendix A of Attachment B. Forestry and Fire Warden Department: The Fire Department has also submitted a memo dated September 1, 1987, containing several requirements for this project. This memo is included in Appendix A of Attachment B. ZONING ISSUES As stated previously, the purpose of a specific plan is to allow a City and a developer to work together to create specific development criteria for a specific area and such development criteria need not be consistent with the City's Zoning regulations, however, it does need to be consistent with the community's General Plan. Even so it is appropriate to use the Zoning Ordinance for analysis purposes in reviewing the project. For this reason the following analysis of the proposed project and the requirements of the Ci_ty's R-3 zone is provided. Minimum square footage: 1 bedroom unit 2 bedroom unit Percentage open space Parking: Garage spaces Required 800 sq.ft. 1000 sq.ft. 40% 308 attached Proposed 670 sq.ft. 860/880 sq.ft. 42% 308 detached Open air spaces 308 308 Guest spaces 77 36 Setbacks: Front yard 25 ft. ivlt. Vernon 15 ft Canal 15 ft. Side yard 5 ft. 10 ft. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: All conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission and contained in Appendix A of Attachment B are recommended for approval by the City Council by the Planning Department. RECOMMENDATION: This property is an important key in the development of the Mt. Vernon triangle area. The development of this property as proposed will provide a continuity of development style for the large majority of this area and will allow for internal circulation between the previously approved Phase I and }phase II. If this property is not developed in conjunction with Phase I, the potential exists for this land to be sold as a whole or divided up into smaller individual projects. This would decrease the changes of obtaining a coordinated development of the triangle area. A piece meal development pattern of this area would have a negative effect on the public health, safety and welfare of -the area as a result of each development requiring separate access points on to Mt. Vernon and Canal Street. Also, the inability of a small project to provide many of the recreational and landscaping amenities a larger development can afford to provide would place a heavier burden on the City's recreation and park facilities. After review of the proposed plan and in consideration of the suggested conditions of approval for the project by the various reviewing agencies, the Planning Department recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving SP-CUP-87-1 and its associated Negative Declaration as conditioned in said resolution (See Attachment A). Respectfully submitted, �y David Sawyer., Planning Director A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SP/CUP-87-1 AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Applicant, Forest City Dillon, has applied for approval of SP/CUP 87-1, (Exhibit A) at 1191.4 Mt. Vernon Avenue; and WHEREAS, the adoption of SP/CUP-87-1 would incorporate the adoption of a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project (Exhibit B); and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on September 21, 1987, regarding this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the adoption of SP/CUP-87-1 is consistent with the goals of the Cit,y's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the City council approve SP/CUP-87-1 and the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public bearing was held by the City Council on October 22, 1987, regarding this application. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Environmental Review - An environmental review ---------- - ----- - of SP/CUP-87-1 has been conducted and noticed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; that based upon review, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace finds that the proposed project, as mitigated, will not have a significant effect upon the environment and therefore the attached Negative Declaration is hereby approved. Section 2. Mitigation Measures - The mitigation measures for the Negative Declaration shall consist of the conditions of the approval for the SP/CUP-87-1 as listed below. Section 3. Public Hearing - A public hearing has been noticed, held, and conducted in the time, form and manner pursuant to Government Code Section 65355. Section 4. Findings - This City Council does hereby make the following findings relative to the adoption of SP/CUP-87-i: 1. That SP/CUP-87-1 wi l i not be detrimental: a) To the general Health, safety, morals, comrnrt, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or within the City; or ATTACHMENT A b) Injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City; and 2. SP/CUP-87-1 is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan; and BE 11' FURTHER RFSO LVED that SP/CUP 87-1 is hereby approved siihject to the following conditions: 1. Canal Street a) Widen Canal Street in accordance with a plan approved by the City of Grand Terrace. b) Provide access across Gage Canal to Canal Street as approved by the City of Grand Terrace, City of Riverside and Gage Canal Company. The access to be approved shall include vehicular, pedestrian and utilities as may be required by the proposed development. 2. Mt. Vernon Avenue a) Dedications to the ultimate right of way 44 foot half street shall be provided. b) Install curb and gutter 12 feet from centerline. c) Install standard sidewalk. d) Access to subject property from Mt. Vernon Avenue shall be provided at a location where the sight distance and the stopping distance meets at least the minimum requirements of. the Highway Design 4W Manual. . e) Median turning lane shall he constructed for the left and right turn movement into the development. Said median island shall be approved by the Planning Department as to architectural treatment of the materials to be used within the island area. 3. Install ornamental street lights. 4. Provide adequate drainage facilities and an erosion control plan during construction. 5. Pay pro-rata share of the traffic signal installation at the following intersections: a) Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. b) Barton Road and Canal Street. 6. File a one lot subdivision on the parcels on which this project is prepared. 7. Pay off all outstanding sewer bond amounts for A.D. l CSA 70 'Lone H. 8. Provide access easement to any parcel abutting this property which may now have access across Gage Canal. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a "Will Serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company shall he submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. 10. All u.tiIiti.es shall be underground. 11. All private streets shall• be constructed to provide a structural section based on a traffic index of five. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the water system shall be designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Riverside Highland Water Company, the San Bernardino County Fire Department and City Engineer. 1.4. Prior to the issuance of bui.lding permits, street improvements plans shall be designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. All improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, street improvement plans shall be designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. All off. -site run-off that presently drains over the site shall continue to be accepted. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, obtain a letter of non-interference from any utility companv that may have rights of easement within the property boundaries. 1.9. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the r.esponsibi1iry of the sievetoper. 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay all. applicable school development fees that may exist at ghat time. 21. 'rhe water system and fire hvdrants ,halt be installed in accordance with the requirements of the State Hea i th and Saret.v Code, the (aliforni.a Administrative Code. and pl all approved by the desi grated fire protection authority. 22. The planting and permanent- i.r.rigation system(s) shall be init.alled per approved landscape plan. 23. All perking areas shall be designated with clearly painted lines and equi.ppe-d with wheel stops. 24. Prior to any occupancy, a Certificate of. Final Completion shall be issued by the City Building Department, after which, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Services for a Certificate of Occupancy. 25. Construction plans for the swimming pools and spas shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Services prior to construction and shall be adequately fenced per. City and County regulations. 26. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. 27. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Building and Safety and the Planning Director. 28. An additional twenty-two guest parking spaces shall be provided for a total of 58 guest parking spaces. All guest parking spaces shall be identified and located in various groupings throughout the project. 29. Street improvement plans for Mt. Vernon Road shall be consistent with those approved for Phase I. 30. The location of the security gates, in relation to the public r-o-w, shall be approved by the City Engineer. 31. All conditions of approval listed in the Fire Department's memo dated September 1, 1987 (Exhibit C) 32. Upon agreement with the holder of the Gage Canal Easement, the applicant shall landscape the Gage Canal. as approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. A maintenance agreement between the City and the applicant shall be executed whereas the applicant will reimburse the. City for the costs of maintenance. ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 1987. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk of the Mayor of the City of City of Grand Terrace and Grand Terrace and of of the City Council thereof. the City CoAincil thereof. I, JUAN11'A BROWN, I)eputy City Clerk of the City of grand Terrace hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 22nd day of October, 1987, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney .95 4 (SEE ATTACHED SPECIFIC PLAN) 11 EXHIBIT A C BYRON R.MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIG'AAUSFN Mayor Pro Tern Council Members HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHW,%B City Manager NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is her.ebv filed on the below -referenced project, nn the basis that said project will not have a significant effect nil the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Construction of 308 apartment units on 19.46 acres. The project will contain 1.56 one bedroom units, 152 two bedroom units and substantial recreational and landscaping amenities. APPLICANT: Forest City Dillon LOCATION: The project is located on the West side of Mt. Vernon Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet North of Barton Road (APNS 275-251-76 and 275-251.-10). FI.NDI.Nr OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFF}CT: Based upon the attached Initial Study and associated mitinatiorl measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Approvad bv: rvw_ David Sawyer - - - - -- - Planning Director, City of Grand Terrace EXHIBIT B 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 9 CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 { CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1. Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3. Date of Environmental Assessment: 4I -- 18 - 87 4. Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable IFDROST Ci1`( >1L.L04.-MTg6?&104?)AaZ__L_ 6. Location of Proposal: M-Fyeczdo AV/-F-;, . fW4 2 7.S-2.S-j--2&)t0 II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ✓ b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? 1✓ c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet lake? or t/ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ✓ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? VIII, f. Alteration of the direction or rate / of flow of ground waters? ,/ Yes Maybe No g . Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No G. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? ✓ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ✓ 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? �✓ 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ✓ 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? I/ 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident / or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ✓ 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ✓ 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 4✓ 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro - proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes Maybe No b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? V"*' e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 4W f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 1/ b. Police protection? c. Schools? 1/ d. Parks or other recreational faci- lities? V/ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? V11, b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes Maybe No b. Communications systems? (/ c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? ✓ f. Solid waste and disposal? ✓ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in; 60 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding health)? mental b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site? V b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ✓ Yes Maybe No d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ✓ potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history ✓ or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 1✓ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's 4, impact on two -or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? �/ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on' the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ,� - ate 6W David Sawyer Planning Mr-ector 7L) 9_� ^---- ignature For City of Grand Terrace III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION No. la The majority of the subject property is currently vacant, therefore the proposed development of the property will result in over covering and compaction of the soil. The project is located in the City,s R-3 zone and is identified as Medium Residential and not as open space in the City's General Plan. 6, No. 3b The change of absorbtion rates will be adequately mitigated proper engineering design and construction techniques as required in the attached conditions of approval. No. 6a The development of vacant property with 308 apartment units will result in an increase in existing noise levels however this impact will be mitigated through design standards included in the Specific Plan and conditions of approval as well as the City's existing Noise Ordinance. No. 7 The increase in light and glare will be mitigated through an approved lighting plan in accordance with the attached conditions of approval. 4W No. 8 The project is the development of 308 residential apartment units on currently vacant property and is consistent with the current zoning and general plan designations for the property. No. 11 See the above No. 8. No. 13a,f The project will result in increased traffic on Mt. Vernon Avenue, Canal Street and Barton Road, however, mitigation measures included in the attached conditions of approval reduce this impact. Y No. 14a,b Design elements included in the Specific Plan as well c,d as the payment of developer fees will reduce the increased demand on these services. No. 1.6abc All existing above ground utilities will be underground and the existing water service capacities will be increased as required in the conditions of. approval. SITE'LOCATION AND SURROUNDING USES N SC ABC I = 500 AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORESTRY OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY s Prolecion Planning Services • County Government Center FLOYD TIDWELL, Director '5 No. ,arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415.0186 �• 714 )'.. 387-4244 LEN J:-. NEWMAN,;.. Chief _ EMERGENCY SERVICES DATE:. REFERENCE #: S TO: CLTY�OF GRAND TE_ RRACE APN: MT OFAN)ok) VILLWS J Phs.a _Plann3l- Dtr�t_., __: _.. FROM: Glen J. Newman 6 �C�I�ID County Fire Warden ; IN -W EL SUBJECT: Fire Protection Requirements S EP 4 1987 Checked Boxes Will Apply To This Project 40 _ PUNNING DEPARTMENT RrF1. The above referenced project is protected by the Forestry 3F001 and Fire Warden Department. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire pro- tection development requirements. F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections 5F002 of the 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No. 106), Development Code, Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fire and fire prevention adopted by the State or County. F3. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of 5FOCthree (3) inch numbers, visible from the street in , accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street. E?r^ F4. Each chimney used in conjuction with any fireplace 5F004 or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. F5. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each 3F005 building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. �F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two 1F006 points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code. F-�-_F7. Private roadways which exceed one -hundred and fifty :.F007 (150) feet in length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one -hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road EXHIBIT C _ and building i( n excess of thirty pe rcen,: (30%). Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protec- tion system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. F8. A turn -around shall be required at the end of each roadway 1F01)8 one -hundred fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six -hundred (600) feet except as identified in the Development Code. F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to 1F009 grading and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction. All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow requirements specificed in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made service- able prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for as required by the water purveyor. Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water. The following are minimum requirements for your proposed development: A. System Standards Fire Flow* 3 OO Q GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure Duration -5 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 4 Feet (Between Fire Hydrants) *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received. B. Distribution Svstem Mains 6 inch minimum Laterals 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C. Fire Hydrants Numbers _Total Type 6 Inch w/ Z AInch w/ National Standard w/ I - ( inch pumper Street Valve 6 Inch Gate -2- outlet/s thread 6 connection 2F!. The required fire flow shall be determined by appro- 1F011 priate calculations, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow." C F12. In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire 3F012 protection water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting." A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. F13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire 1FC13 department with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. In addition, a letter from the water purveyor stating what fire flow can be met shall be required. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. F14. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified 3F014 in San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced. 7 F15. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be 1F015 required. Requirements will be site specific to the project. The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdic- tion prior to recordation of the final map. Mainten- ance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department. Questions and/or comments may be directed to Fire Protection Planning Services at 385 North Arrowhead, 1st floor, San Bernardino, California, 92415-0186, (714) 387-4244 or Fire Protection Planning Services at 15505 Civic Drive, Victorville, California 92392, (619) 243-8100. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GLEN J. NEWMAN County Fire Warden � i� c: 07�// GF 6RAki T�Q� C � �`�IU�('Sib�-H �LF+�,��,��� lv.9rCr, �� I*-) "(_,E f The following are /Non -Standard Conditions Clarifications Comments : Fib_ FIRE EXiIN&,UtsNf-RS IRpr RE ggJfe9 Iti AtfoEVW6 5TAN0A017 !n—�. F 17..AN�/ EATEo A cuss SPA J- RE A?,r<ovt� r If�W C91 APJD &MFR6e N01 r} CCESS n (THE SPECIFIC PLAN IS INCLUDED LOOSE WITH YOUR PACKET) ATTACHMENT B STAFF REPORT L R A ITEM ( ) ;kUENDA ITEM NO. >UBJECT IUNDING REQUIRED _ FUNDING REQUIRED. - X HACKGROU[ND: COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: October 22, 1987 Consider Extension f.or T.J. Austvn's Tentative I'-.,+ Man I '1()5(1 On September 24, 1987 ,your. Counci.] considered a request from T.J. Austen, Inc. for a one—year extension on Tentative Map 13050. At that meeting your Council denied that request, however it was ]earned after the meeting that the applicant had not received proper notice of the meeting and therefore was not present at the time of your deci.sion. Consequently, staff has scheduled this item for a rehearing by ,your. Council at this time. The original staff report dated September 22, 1987 is attached to this report for your i.nformation. The Planning Department's r.ecommendati.on remains as stated in the attached report. Respect_ y Submitted, 1--)Cllw� David R. Sawver, /L Planni.ng Di.r. ecto CCUNCIV AGETQA 11J�* a 0 8 I -STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT FUNDING REQUIRED l0 FUNDING REQUIRED ✓ BACKGROUND: COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: Considered Extension for. T.J. Austyn Tentative Tract Map .13050 On August 5, 1985, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract "lap 13050 and Specific Plan 85-10 to the Citv Council and on September 12, 1985, the City Council approved both items. Tn accordance with the California State Map Act the approval of 'Tentative Tract Map 13050 was set to expire on September 12, 1987. Consequently, staff received a letter from the applicant, T.J. Austyn, Inc. requesting a one year extension of said Map (see Attachment A). On August 17, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended the Citv Council approve the applicant's request for a one-year extension. DISCUSSION: The applicant is actually requesting a one-year extension on only a portion of TM 13050, this portion being phases 5,6, and 7 as illustrated on Attachment B. Phases 1,2,3 and 4 which have been sold by T.J. Austyn to Fieldcrest Homes have received final map approval and are currently under construction. The California State Map Act allows the City Council to extend the approval of a tentative map for a period of time up to three years from the original expiration date. Upon application for an extension by the subdivider prior to the expiration date, the tentative map automatically receives a 60 day extension or until such to me the City Council either approves or denies the application, whichever occurs first. As i I lustraA ed on AttachmPnt C the subiect area 1 s 1,)(:ai Pd hetween c urrent I v dc­ve l oiled k-1 property (r(O ni mum 7,200 s(r. It . lots) to the west, A-1 zoned property (minimum It.3,5t)0 tiC1. I-t . lots wi th at ]owed aVri cu 1 -tiara I uses ) a long wi t.11 pit bl i c of>eit soac'e to t=he east , both P-l. and A-1 zoned property to the sour'-' and R-1 zoned propert,, to i lie north. 'I:Ihe existing land uses for these properties are i l lustr•ated on Attachment 1). The subJect property is currently zoned R-1 as it was at the time of the tentative map and specitic Plan approval in 1985. However, considering the subject propertv's location between two significantly different residential landuse, designations, it would be appropriate that there be Some type of buffer area between the two residential zones (R-1 and A-l). The current zoning for this area does not - provide for this. The upcoming General Plan and 'Zoning Ordinances revision for this area will be considering this issue and a change of land use designations is a possible recommendation. At that time the City Council may decide that a change of zoning (to R-1-20 for instance) may be appropriate for certain properties in this area including a portion if not all of the land contained in TM 13050 phases 5,6, and 7. If this is the case, the Council now has the opportunity to deny the requested extension and prevent the development of this land at the higher density and smaller lot design. If the map is extended for the requested year, it is possible that the subdivider will move forward with his plans to file a final map, and the property will be developed as it is currently planned. RECOMMENDATION: As a result of preliminary research, staff feels that the concept of rezoning some of this area does have some merit and warrants further analysis and should be considered during the upcoming Zoning Ordinance Revision. If the Council agrees with staff that the issue of rezoning some of this area to a larger lot. requirement such as the R-1-20 zoning should be considered during the Zoning Ordinance Revision hearings, Staff recommends the City Council consider one of the following three alternatives: ALTERNATIVE ONE. - deny the request for an extension of TM 13050 phases 5,6, and 7 thereby forcing a new tentative map to be filed which if filed after the Zoning Revision will need to meet the requirements of the revised Zoning Ordinance. AL_T_ERNAT_I_VE TWO - approve an extension of TM 1.3050 phases 5,6 and 7 until after the Zoning Ordinance is revised (4 month extension). After which, if the zoning remains the same, a longer extension may be granted. This alternative does allow the subdivider time to submit a final neap and obtain building permits prior to the time the zoning issue is decided. ALTERNATIVE THREE - approve a 4 month extension of I M 1 050 phases 5 and h and deny the extension of phase 7. This alternative will ensure that phase 7, which extends southward into the area of larger parcels and undivid-d acreage, will not be developed at the smaller ]of sizes before the zoning Issue is decided. It also allows the subdivider a window of time to prepare a final map for phases 5 and 6 Drior to the zoning ordinance hearing's which will dictate whether or not phases 5 and 6 should be extended or denied at the end of the 4 month extension period. If the City Council decides that the issue of rezoning portions of this area should not: be considered during the upcoming zoning hearings or that the area of land covered by T`1 I3050 should not be considered for rezoning during the hearings the City Council may choose the following alternative: ALTERNATIVE FOUR - approve a one-year extension of TM 13050 phases 5,6 and 7 as requested. Respectfully Submitted, (avid Sawyer, tanning Director r-- Mr. David Sawyer City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 T.J. AUSTYN, INC. 500 N. Newport Boulevard Suite 201 Newport Beach, Califomia 92663 i (714) 642-6659 July 15, 1987 Re: Tract Maps 13050-5, 13050-6 and 13050-Final Dear Mr. Sawyer: T.J. Asutyn, Inc. is currently getting ready to record Tract Maps 13050, 13050-5 and 13050-6. Our tentative maps expire September 12, 1987. In the event our construction loan does not fund promptly it will be necessary to extend our tentative maps for 1 year. Please consider this letter a request for extension for all three maps. MAE/ejs Sincerely, I 6-n Q l t/ t,,, CX ��pj c c) Mary Anne Eliot Project Manager f;ECE IVED r e f F- 'T VICINlr*r AIA,1 7'Y.-fCAL $fCrtON P/Co TYRCAL 4wam U•'n.,c•. R•_ s "ov =U NPICAL JfC710 w Y, wx_,tpxr ? EXISnIm RESERVOM ST ElT D rr'IC•AL MUM' -z—zf% �74 c CITRUS CRO­ -T11 --1$TLF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13050 JI �A�E 100 _7 Snc�Lk T "'Ll FVSCCK VIHJ-Lkms 1. T-1 ..I. TRACT .... EXIST— RE8I —111. ATTACHMENT B : 1 ,_ .��� 1 c � � 7 tom" 1 i Y -�r�d. < �-,�• � �' T yy '� 'Ti �;,�' ', f ,t.�r•. � ,r pp 1 l _ t t � y or tt a.';�-�� i �� t}'ti •�. d i. f r ,. •� ?�' .fit L. (: �"� � r, `� � 1{:.;r� ��t' :a+� TQ� r•('_ �,.ar. f (` i t' - ,t� 11 ►►" l � � M t _ f i ti� . i ,• �.. � t _ i• l S-.L--i-..-i ., _I i i r �- �c:..r r l!!f�i�j�+�,�'j • �1\`•.. a 1 i t" t; i � . . w•!c,{ �"' ,.'^",fir i.Y ,. l �• L'�" .�-�' ( ' � �'J, �!� p�/N'.'M+VII.•Y•.w•✓1Vr•.. �a..w:t�r-7Tr1 �11. rY rv+,,��yyYlc�. � `p,� A.b \'. + .. •,� j,41, �� ... �► .�, v Y• � i.+xii �.: - ems• r:�W"Y Si ' l �•� r 'tL��� v �.,wrr.'M".�+•w"�wr�^►•.�r r• .i� err �„ ', �,�y+ tiy�(3�eC:� � ,, ,�� �\ a 'mod. � � • - • - _, Ir ' w ,y • 1 l `�'�� �-el ' f ..w • • 7.?iir Wta6i+fir't►� ,� r� ti q�s�f1 4 • "..+� •�G,1�/ti,„..F•♦•M�'.A�w. 1.1 tl� ; � � r .. � r c,, � i ...; !r � �.'l\\ � �� ` f i.. , v' ♦ to rs ji 1 1 � � r ..�ty.>.nrrr-..4 •ri/ r 7r r1I 4 . IiiSt ti6 ..y .i `, � � F rh? , t �f -. w.•w..w*+r•w'r.i. rw tm.` r -+ t 1<' r t F �•':utsi�l4s?t - ..t � � � � F�,,t. 11 '� `�, r � - . vu..•wr'• 1"ems ta14►' a , ` • Ii+�k 0` r_.�',`� �.`` •• r' .'• `y� ly �1 r� , ; t • 1!! " wig t owsawvF 003", • .rJ}� A ' ».wit sc+tw�.w•. w�i'... , " >t ; 4! i ve + � SYr"` ..�.ww• �..... • -.'1 7•� 7 �''1 4�WpvW ►e+ ir�YirGa + I'' �t�E�� � i � ci t �-. I r •. 2�t - �4• x,� .lYM f ` i lrl t i 1 7 "t r• . .1 � � W � ? 1< qq 1 � ? � ` i i t ftu .w..-¢+ � .. 1 : ••a.►tw1ArM'Yyr IIr+/�• �?v'»'+[t �Y A�q►Y*1*W+�. "+Or��'1r�T/lrl�RNtN���:• o ., r _i�iw au'WIliii�I� f t �cr i. _ r 114 ,� � 1�G' `.S �.,� ,t� •it 44' s r. I 'fir t f , { tip- . f •., �8+9 e, t e, t,p Itr i i, t. �711, v.rw.+varw.i...a!>i.�.• w.•. �.� - �'i''l'�•' T l 1 • .; �, l., . . «,• � ' Al.`, .�.It�. •'` . -- ' t� "� } � - '�;� 1 T � t <. •,,.`yr.....�.,..+ , � � ~ � p.+`��,i�ya�Z 'rn�r Li +=-�i=��l�� ."i'""rou�...rrrw•�Nr�w�r.«w.r --•7'm,-v''•rti l t 1 +'b....` wrE f: '4 + [�ri ilt ! t �: f. � ..: - - • w �'i r1 l actV _ � / . � q l ( '. t i l\ �4 r � t t{*•f+d f1y� cr � �� r ,•ti , i.� t�". r, •. ,- }j* I � '�t •v ♦ � .�d'J ' '.i �llr` -^.X -f "��ld y^ � L `, � - 0 ! , ,r .�; t i .1 f I . i+ � i � � 4 Y r t, / 1; _ � r�3 .;�! *�"a��,,► � ';,� 1 • � fir' � •. r 1 t4 , •. ., t i.� # i rl iy <. r J +Ia ,y'.'y., � - t}' / ! ' f 4 ! � : � � `•� yi IaLf�,.()}.�1. �{'j. a � �, � ,t , � r . it E � 2 u•;,st_ r+. r � . # t � } t 4 t + G � + '� •�.' � • l }. L ' max. - � (J'J Stl yi •�4 G � ��;: ,t .. ` ZONING MAP LEGEND 0,A-1 (LIVIT. AGRICULTURE) El R-1 (S.F. RES.) Q PUB (PUBLIC) ATTACHMENT C EXIt,,rING LANDUSE MAP 21 DEVELOPED R-1 RES. W/HORSES R-1 UNDER CONST. CHURCH GROVES 0FQ1 CONVENT SINGLE RESIDENCE RESERVOIR ATTACHMENT D DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1987 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1987 SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEETING DATES/CITY BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X BELOW ARE CALDENDARS FOR THE MONTHS OF NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER, INDICATING PRESENTLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETINGS. SINCE THERE ARE COUNCIL MEETINGS THAT FALL ON HOLIDAYS, COUNCIL NEEDS TO DECIDE ON AN ALTERNATIVE DATE. NOVEMBER 1987 DECEMBER 1987 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 @ 13 14 6 7 8 9 &1 12 15 16 17 13 i9 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23025 26 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 STAFF NEEDS DIRECTION AS TO WHETHER COUNCIL DESIRES TO HAVE A NINTH -YEAR CITY BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION AND WHETHER COUNCIL DESIRES THIS TO BE AN ANNUAL EVENT OR EVERY FIVE OR TEN YEARS. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT: COUNCIL MAKE A DECISION ON WHICH DATE(S) WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR THE MONTHS OF NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION AS TO THE CITY'S BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION. �S NITA BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # eA