06/09/1983A
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
TERRACE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
22731 Grand Terrace Road
AGENDA
* Call to Order
* Invocation - Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center
* Pledge of Allegiance
* Roll Call
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Approval of Minutes (May 26, 1983)
Staf f
Recommendations
Approve
2.
Approval of Check Register No. CRA060983
Approve
3.
Fire Station/Civic Center Status Report
4.
Consideration of MSI Consulting Services
Proposal
5.
Low & Moderate Income Housing Study
6.
Budget Appropriation - Fire Station Access
7.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CRA OF THE CITY OF GRAND
Adopt
TERRACE, CA, DESIGNATING THE POSTING
REQUIREMENT OF RESOLUTIONS, NOTICES, & PUBLIC
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISHED OR
POSTED
8
Commercial Development Status Report
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1.
Items to add/delete
2.
Approval of Minutes (May 26, 1983)
Approve
3.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
f
JUNE 9, 1983
5:30 P.M.
Council Action
COUNCIL AGENDA
6/9//83
Page 2 of 3
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
expected to be routine and non-controversal.
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
(Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request
an item be removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
A. Approval of Check Register No. 060983
B. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 78-18 AND AMENDING THE
POSTING REQUIREMENT OF ORDINANCES,
RESOLUTIONS, NOTICES, & PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISHED OR POSTED
C. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 80-46, AND AMENDING THE
AUTHORIZING REPRESENTATIVES TO ACQUIRE
FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE
CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SUPLUS PROPERTY
D. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RELATING TO
PARTICIPATION IN SERVICE CLUBS & CIVIC
ACTIVITIES BY CITY OFFICERS & SUPERVISORY
EMPLOYEES
E. Budget Transfer - $4,511 from Balance
Forward to Line Item 18-4908-255 (Street
Sweeping)
5. ORAL REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
(1) Fund Request to Landscape Barton/Palm
Triangle
B. Parks & Recreation Committee
C. Energy Committee
(1) Status Report
Staf f
Recommendations
Approve
Adopt
Adopt
Adopt
Approve
Council Action
f
r
COUNCIL AGENDA
6/9//83
Page 3 of 3
D. Historical & Cultural Activities Comm.
E. Crime Prevention Committee
(1) Accept Resignation of Evelyn Strawn
F. Emergency Operations Committee
G. Police Chief
H. Fire Chief
I. City Engineer
J . City Attorney
K. City Manager
L. City Council
(1) Mayors/Councilmembers Executive Forum
Attendees
6. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:30 P.M.
A. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, REGULATING THE
DISCHARGE OF WASTES INTO THE SEWERAGE
SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Non -Conforming Signs
B. Request by Colton Joint Unified School
Dist. to Implement Ordinance No. 54
Authorizing Builders' Fees and/or Land
Dedication
ADJOURN
NEXT REGULAR MEETING - THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 1983
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE JUNE 23 MEETING
MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12:00 NOON ON JUNE 15.
BENDING ur�A A� KO AL 83
CRA_ AGENDA 1TEI'A NO. 1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR, MEETING - MAY 26, 1983
The reoular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,
.as held in the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on May 26, 1983, at 5:31 p.m.
PRESENT: Huah J. Grant, Chairman
Jim Ricley, Vice Chairman
Tony Petta
Roy W. Nix
Barbara Pfennighausen
Seth Armstead, Executive Director
Ed Clark, Treasurer
Euoene Nazarek, Attorney
Ivan Hopkins, Attorney
Myrna Erway, Secretary
ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (5-12-83)
CP,A-83-57 Motion by Mrs. Pfenni ahausen, Second by Mr. Nix, ALL AYES, to
approve the Minutes of lay 12, 1983 as presented.
CHECK REGISTER NO. CRAD52683
CRP.-83-58 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mr. Rigley, ALL AYES, to approve Check
Register No. CRAD52683 as presented.
FIRE STATION/CIVIC CENTER STATUS REPORT
Fire Station - Architect Larry Wolff advised the project is running
smoothly, with no major problems or change orders. Forty days were
lost, due to inclement weather, with the contractor requesting only
a 30-day extension. The previous completion date of July 10 is now
expected to be August 10. Indicated satisfaction with the
contractor.
Civic Center - Mr. Wolff distributed diagrams reflecting the
proposed revisions and reviewed the revised floor plans which
reflect a space reduction of 1,900 square feet. The ground level
now consists of 17,400 square feet. The 1,400 square foot community
room was relocated to the ground level; the space allocated for
planning, community services, mail/duplication, and the EOC/lounge
have been reduced slightly to accommodate the building & safety and
engineering functions. The central stairway has been eliminated,
and the elevator has been relocated.
Page 1
CRA - 5/26/83
n
n
The second level now consists of 4,350 square feet. Space has been
allocated for a small restroom, shared office space for the Council
members, and an office for the Mayor. Stated the capability of
adding a second level above the community room has been retained.
The revised elevations will be presented later for review.
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
Staff was requested, during a Public Workshop Session, to place this
item on the agenda to consider appropriating S15,000 for the Terrace
Hills Junior Nigh S„imming Pool, SSOO for a Fire Hydrant Survey, and
55,550 for drainage improvenents in the vicinity of Pico/Mt. Vernon.
In discussion, it was clarified that the proposed drainage
improvements consist of reconstructing two driveways in that
vicinity and are considered to be the most practical temporary
solutions. The ultimate solution is completion of the major storm
drain, planned for completion in approximately two years.
Chairman Grant stated that should Engineering Staff's recommendation
be approved by the Agency, he will vote for it, for the sake of
unanimity, and to ensure completion prior to the next rains. Stated
he is not satisfied this is the solution to Mrs. Haslem's problem.
Mr. P,.ix advised that the, Agency is proposing to assist with the fund
which was started by the Grand Terrace Lions Club to provide funding
to refurbish the Terrace Hills Junior High Swimming Pool, which is
predominantly used by the community. Recommended that the $15,000
appropriation, if approved, be turned over to the fund for
rehabilitating the pool, rather than turning the funds over to the
Colton Joint Unified School District.
CRA-83-59 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mr. Petta, to: (1) Appropriate $15,000,
to be turned over to the fund for rehabilitating the Terrace Hills
Junior High School Swimming Pool; (2) Appropriate $500 for payment
of engineering services to complete a Grand Terrace Fire Hydrant
Survey; (3) Authorize Staff to contact the property owners involved,
explaining the work that would be done on the properties, relative
to drainage improvements, and requesting the right -of -entry to do
the work; and (4) Authorize the expenditure of $5,550 for the
reconstruction of the driveways as proposed in the Staff Report
dated May 20, 1983, Subject: Drainage Problem at Intersection of
Pico and Mt. Vernon.
Following clarification by Mr. Rigley that the purpose of the Fire
Hydrant Survey is to determine any repairs which may be needed on
the present fire hydrants, and to establish sites where additional
fire hydrants should be located, Motion No. CRA-83-59 carried, ALL
AYES.
Page 2
CRA - 5/26/83
two
CO!41MERCIAL DEVELOPt,,ENT STATUS REPORT
The Finance/Administrative Services Officer stated he had been
advised by Mr. Illsley, Ashwill/Schneider, that the Board of
Directors of Federated Stores will consider the proposed agreement
for the fees to be charged by Ashwill Schneider for land acquisition
next week.
Recess was called at 6:05 p.m. and reconvened at 9:22 p.m., with all
members present.
CIVIC CENTER PROJECT - TAX INCREMiENT FIN4NCING
Attorney Nazarek advised that a Public Hearing is to be held on this
..atter, pursuant to Section 33678 of the Health & Safety Code.
Notice of this Public Hearing has been given in the time, form and
manner required by law, which is publication of the Notice of
Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation at least twice
preceding the hearing date. Municipal Services, Inc. prepared a
summary of information which is required und?r the Health & Safety
Code, on the use of tax increment, which has been placed on file
with the City Cleri: and the Secretary of the Community Redevelopment
Agency at least on the day preceding the first publication of the
Notice of Hearing.
Whenever the CRA proposes to utilize tax increment revenues to
finance a public building, the Health & Safety Code requires that a
public hearing be held to determine whether or not the proposed
facility will benefit the project area, and whether tax increment
financing is the only reasonable means of financing available. The
summary of information sets forth a brief description of the methods
of financing and estimates of the amount of tax increment revenue
which would be utilized, including projections of interest and
discussion on the alternative methods of financing.
The methods of financing are: (1) Assessment Financing - the
report concludes that assessment financing would not be a viable
method because it can only be used for special benefit projects,
whereas the proposed project is of general benefit; (2) Revenue
Bonds - feeling these would not generate revenue, other than the
City's General Fund, the report concludes that those revenues would
be insufficient to accommodate the project, or if sufficient, would
adversely impact other needed future projects; (3) Mello -Roos
Community Facilities Act - the report concludes that since this is a
new, untested act, it could be subject to legal challenge, so would
not be considered a viable method until there has been more
experience with this method.
In conclusion, tax increment financing is considered to be the only
viable method of financing which will not be adverse.
Page 3
CRA - 5/26/83
M
n
Chairman Grant opened Public Hearing on the use of tax increment to
finance the civic center project, and closed Public Hearing, there
being no testimony for or against the matter.
Attorney Nazarek was questioned if the fire station could be
included in the project, and replied it is still being considered as
part of the civic center project; hopes to advise within the next 30
days whether or not the fire station financing can be included in
the second phase of the civic center project.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAND TEP.FACE, �L IFORNIA, VAKiNG F1N'D_ NGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND
CGNSENIING TO THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES TO FINANCE THE CIVIC
CENTER PROJECT.
CRA-83-60 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mr. Petta, ALL AYES, to adopt
Resolution No. 83-22.
RESOLUTION NO. CRA-83-04 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVLLOPI,',LNT't r HE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION'S AND AUTHORIZING THE USE OF TAX
INCREMENT REVENUES TO FINANCE THE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT.
CRA-83-61 Notion by ter. Ri gl ey, Second by f irs. Pfenni ghausen, ALL AYES, to
adopt Resolution No. CRA,-83-04.
LOW & MODERATE INC01"E HOUSING FUND
Attorney Nazarek stated he was questioned as to whether 20v' of the
tax increment must continue to be set aside if the City is meting,
or partially meeting the needs for low and moderate income housing.
Stated the answer is "no" if the City and Agency are willing to
undertake a brief study to determine the existence of low and
moderate income housing within the community and within an area
reasonably adjacent to the community to totally or partially meet
the requirements of the 20% being set aside. If such a study is
conducted, then an informal public hearing would be conducted,
and if, based upon the study and testimony received, the Agency
believes the requirements are being partially met, the Agency can
make the determination to reduce the 20c being set aside to a lower
percentage, possibly zero, thus making available more tax increment
to be utilized for other projects. Stated no action is being
requested on this matter at this time; recommended consideration be
given, since it is a good possibility the requirements are being
partially met, which would justify setting aside 8% or 12%, rather
than 20%.
"SOIL STEWARDSHIP fiONTH" - SLIDE PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATION
Eileen West, Secretary-Treasurer/,,anaoer, Riverside -Corona Resource
Conservation District, gave a slide presentation on soil
conservation. Stated the District provides technical assistance to
individual property owners and governmental agencies relative to
Page 4
CRA - 5/26/83
soil or rater resource problems to apply conservation measures.
This assistance includes soil survey reports and geographic
information to identify problems and providing solutions to the
problems.
The Agency discussed areas in the City which could benefit
fromassistance from the Conservation District, such as Slue Mountain
and the hill on Mt. Vernon, at the north entrance to the City.
Chairman Grant read and presented a Proclamation designating the
month of May as "Soil Ste�sardship Xonth."
Consideration was given to adjourning to a joint public workshop
session with the Planning Commission. Discussion was held on MSI
preparing a proposal for expanded consultation services to include
developing an economic developnent plan for the entire City and
financing CRA projects.
Chairman Grant left the chambers at 10:25 p.m.
The Agency concluded that the MSI proposal should be placed on the
June 9 Aoenda for consideration.
ADJOURN
The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency adjourned
at 10:40 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held June 9, 1983.
Respectfully submitted,
`, FMMMM "Met,
APPROVED:
airman
Page 5
CRA - 5/26/83
CHECK
NO.
ND1NG GEA AppRO
PE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
JUNE 9, 1983
June 9, 1983
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA060983
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF JUNE 9. 1983
(1)
P1210
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST.
SODIUM VAPOR LIGHT BULBS FOR TRIANGLE AT
BARTON AND PALM.
$ 33.25
(2)
P1211
ALEXANDER GRANT & COMPANY
COMPUTER SERVICES FOR MAY, 1983
110.00
)
P1212
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL
RENT FORK LIFT TO PLACE LIGHTS AT TRIANGLE/
BARTON 'AND PALM.
116.00
(4)
P1213
VOID
CLERICAL ERROR
(5)
P1214
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES
TRIANGLE/BARTON AND PALM
16.50
FIRE STATION/AZURE HILLS CHURCH
2O6.70
GENERAL ENGINEERING 4/25-5/22/83
300.00
FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION
655.20
MOTOCROSS
1,628.50
BARTON RD/MT.VERNON BEAUTIFICATION
106.00
TRAFFIC FLOW PLAN
86.00
MASTER PLAN STORM DRAINS
1,383.50
PICO STREET WIDENING
30.00
TOTAL:KICAK
$4,412.40
(6)
P1215
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK
(MASTERCHARGE) MEETING 5/19/83, SETH AND CRA DEVELOPERS 20.54
DISCUSS UNUSED SB99 BONDS. TOTAL: $4,692.19
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN
AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA.
ED14ARD R. CLARK
TREASURER
Date: 6/6/83
S1°AFF REPOT
C R A ITEM (XX) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
G+P
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSULTING SERVICES IN PREPARATION OF A REDEVELOPMENT
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
During the selection process for a financial consultant for the fire station,
Municipal Services Inc. had proposed expanding its consulting services to include a
comprehehsive review of this Agency's redevelopment strategy.
At the regular meeting of January 27, 1983 the Agency discussed the proposal,
returning it to staff for a more explicit "statement of work"... "to identify the
financial situation and alternatives" for the entire City.
On May 26, 1983, Municipal Services Inc., resubmitted its amended proposal. The
current proposal is for the preparation of a Redevelopment Implementation
Strategy. One might call this an economic development strategy. The proposal is to
identify this City's options for short term and long term development; identify
potential sites throughout the community for possible development. In general this
proposal is to prepare a strategy for providing for the economic health of the
entire city. The cost is to be $20,000.
Each Agency member is requested to bring their copy of the proposal to the June 9,
1983 meeting.
Staff recommends that the Agency:
A. AUTHORIZE THE AGENCY CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MUNICIPAL SERVICES
INC. FOR THE SERVICES OUTLINED IN THIS PROPOSAL FOR A FEE OF $20,000.
B. DIRECT STAFF TO INCLUDE $20,000 IN LINE ITEM 22-4200-250 IN THE PROPOSED
FY83-84 BUDGET.
EC: TC:10
Date: June 6, 1983
StAFF REPM I a-0
C R A ITEM (XXX) COUNCIL ITEM ( )
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
SUBJECT: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND
Mr. Nazarek, Brown & Nazarek, briefed the Agency at May 26, 1983 meeting concerning
subject fund.
Mr. Nazarek recommended the CRA establish a low and moderate income housing fund
and to deposit 20% of the Tax Increment received into said fund. The CRA has
already established this fund and should have approximately $38,000 in it by
the end of this fiscal year, June 30, 1983.
Mr. Nazarek further recommended that the CRA authorize -a study by a consultant
to develop a factual basis on which to establish findings as to whether less
than 20% of the Tax Increment is required. The difference, if the study findings
determine less than 20% is required, could be used to fund other capital projects.
Any reduction in the 20 will enhance the security for the Bonds/COPS that are
planned for the Fire Station and Civic Center. The staff believes that the
consultant used for this study should be familiar with all of our CRA and City
Financing, as well as the housing in and around Grand Terrace. The firm that
is capable of making this study and is familar with our financing as well as
housing is Municipal Services, Inc.
The Staff Recommends the Agency:
A. APPOINT A COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH MSI TO PERFORM A STUDY
OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONCEPTS OUTLINED
IN MR. NAZAREK'S LETTER.
encl. Low and moderate income housing fund letter, May 4, 1983.
ERC:pt
0
n
F MACKENZIE BROWN'
,JOHN R HARPER'
IVAN L. HOPKINS
GEORGE W MCFARLIN
EUGENE A NAZAREK*
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LAW OFFICES OF
BROWN 8 NAZAREK
2171 CAMPUS DRIVE, SUITE 330
IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92715
(714) 752-8494
May 4, 1983
Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92324
Attn: Seth Armstead, Executive Director
Re: Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
Dear Mr. Armstead:
LOS ANGELES (213) 587-4755
SAN BERNARDINO (714) 824-8360
SAN DIEGO (619) 457-2376
RIVERSIDE (714) 359-5489
RECFI��r
##AY 4 1983
In accordance with our discussion, I have reviewed the
provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law relating to the
allocation of tax increment to the Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund. These procedures may be summarized as follows:
1. Establishing Fund - Pursuant to Section 33334.2 and
33334.3, not less than twenty percent (20%) of all tax
increment a oca e o the Redevelopment gency mint
use y the Redevelopment Aqency for the purposes of be
increasing and improving e community s supp_ly of low
an mo era sin The twenty percent tzu%)
a oc n must be held in a separate
Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund until used and any
interest earned accrues to the fund.
2. Express Powers - In order to carry out the purposes of a
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Redevelop-
ment Agency may exercise all or any of its,powers
including the following:
(a) Acquire land or building sites.
(b) Improve land or building sites with on -site or
off -site improvements.
(c) Donate land to private or public persons or
entities.
(d) Construct, acquire and/or rehabilitate buildings or
structures.
Law OFFICES OF
BROWN & NAZAREK
n
Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Grand Terrace
May 4, 1983
Page Two
(e) Provide subsidies to or for the benefit of very low
income households and families of low or moderate
income.
(f) Develop plans, pay principal and interest on bonds,
loans, advances or other indebtedness.
(g) Meet, in whole or part, the replacement housing
provisions of Section 33413.
(h) Use funds inside or outside the project area;
provided that findings are made that the use of
funds outside the project area will be of benefit to
the project area.
3. Use of Funds - The twenty percent (20%) allocation may
be used both inside and outside of the project area. If
the funds are used outside of the project area, both the
Redevelopment Agency and City Council must adopt a
resolution determining that such use will be of benefit
to the project.
4. Low and Moderate Income Housing Outside Project Area -
Prior to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, the City
Council made a finding that the provision of low and
moderate income housing outside of the project area will
be of benefit to the project; consequently, the project
area did not have to include property suitable for low
and moderate income housing. This provision in
conjunction with the right to use the funds outside of
the project area indicates that the Redevelopment Agency -
and City Council may consider the av i abilit of low an -ad
mo era a income housing botn inside and outside of the
protect area.
5. Reduction of Twenty Percent Allocation - The obligation
to allocate twenty percent (20$) of the tax increment to
the Low and Moderate Income Mu"gin Fund may be modified
jJ_the Redevelopment Agency makes one of the roilowing
findings:
(a) That no -need exists in the ommunit , the provision
of which would benefit the project area to improve
or increase the supply of low and moderate income
housing; or
LAW OFFICES OF
BROWN & NAZAREK
Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Grand Terrace
May 4, 1983
Page Three
(b) That some stated percentage less than twenty percent
(20%) of the taxes which are allocated to the
Redevelopment Agency is sufficient to meet such
housing need; or
..M...
(c) That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate
income housing nee s in the community is being made,
and that this effort, including the obligation o
funds currently available for the benefit of the
community from state, local and federal sources for
low and moderate income housing alone or in
combination with the allocation of tax increment, is
equivalent in im act to the funds otherwise re uired
o be set aside in the Low and moderate Income
Housing Fund.
In order to make any of the foregoing findings, it will
be necessary for the Redevelopment Agency to authorize
the on o _uyy its consultants deveo
pap
the faftc-tuai oasis necessary upon w is to�ke any of the
foregoing findinqs.
6. Department of Housing and Community Development - Within
ten 10) da s after making any of the foregoing fi din s,
the Re eve opment Agency must send the Department of
Housingand Communit Development a copy of Such findings
including the factual in orma ion supporting such
findings.
7. Litigation - In the event of any litigation challenging
the foregoing n ding, the burden is upon the Redevelop-
ment Agency to establish that the finding is supported by
substantial evidence in light of the entire record before
the Redevelopment Agency. Implicit in this requirement
is the need for factual information and a public hearing
on such information, in or er to develop a proper
administrative record. Any challenge, however, must be
brought within sixty (60) days after making the finding.
It is the recommendation of this office that the Redevelop-
ment Agency estAb_1-1s_h a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and
to deposit twe en (20%) of the tax increment received by
the Redevelopment Agency inMsuch fund —.--Until a study can be
completed and a proper administrative recor evelopment in
support of a finding reducing the obligation to allocate twenty
percent (20%) of the tax increment, the Redevelopment Agency must
OFFICES OF
BROWN & NAZAREK
Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Grand Terrace
May 4, 1983
Page Four
continue to deposit twenty percent (20%) of he tax increment into
this low and moderate income housing fund., furthermore, in
conducting the study to reduce the 20% allocation, the existence
of low and moderate income housing outside of the project area and
outside of the City boundaries may be considered; provided that
the existence of such housing can be reasonably related to the
needs and obligations of the Redevelopment Agency
Very truly yours,
Eu ene Nazare:7
9 A.
EAN:mdh
StAFF REPCFkT
Ea
C R A ITEM (xx) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: 6/9/83
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Azure Hills Church Parking Lot & Access to Fire Station
Date: 6/6/83
The Agency, at its meeting on May 26, 1983, approved an agreement with the Azure
Hills Church to provide additional access to the Fire Station through the Church's
parking lot. The costs were to be divided on a pro-rata basis. The City to pay an
estimated $24,060. The church has agreed to pay $30,640 for a total cost of
$54,700.
The Fire Station is a Community Redevelopment Agency project. The Agency must also
approve the agreement. cry
Staff Recommends that the Agency:.� �,•Q�`�
�(1) AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE DESIGN OF THE PARKING LOT AND ACCESS
ROADWAY;
(2) APPROVE THE FORMULA FOR SHARING THE FINAL COSTS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT;
(3) DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AZURE HILL SEVENTH DAY
y,.� ADVENTIST CHURCH AND THE CITY FOR THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL ACCESS THROUGH THEIR
PROPER1*Y-1-4W
(4) AUTHORIZE STAFF TO APPROPRIATE FROM CRA BALANCE FORWARD AN AMOUNT OF $24,060
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ACCESS. THIS INCREASES THE CURRENT CRA DEFICIT OF
$368,221 TO A NEW BALANCE OF $392,281.
EC:TC:lo
Enclosures
Date: May 20, 1983
A-
StAFFREP%ji-\T 12.242
12-10.1005
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: May 26, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Azure Hills Church Parking Lot S Access to Fire Station
On May 11, the staff met with Mr. Bader of the Azure Hills Church to
discuss the potential additional access to the fire station. As directed
by the City Council, the staff has evaluated on a preliminary basis the
cost estimate for the construction of the parking lot within the church
property and at the same time, providing access to the rear of the fire
station through that parking lot.
Based on our discussion with Mr. Bader, we have attached a pro-rata
share of the costs that could be attributed to each, the church and the
City. These pro-rata costs should be used to develop a formula for
the final costs that would be attributable to each.
It is our opinion that the preliminary cost estimate, as presented, is
reasonable.
Staff recommends:
1. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE STAFF TO PROCEED
WITH THE DESIGN OF THE PARKING LOT AND ACCESS ROADWAY.
2. APPROVE, BASED ON THE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE,
AS A FORMULA FOR SHARING OF THE FINAL COSTS TO PROCEED WITH
THE PROJECT.
3. TO PREPARE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AZURE HILLS CHURCH
AND THE CITY FOR THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL ACCESS THROUGH THEIR
PROPERTY.
JK /Ibk
Attachment
M
n
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Description
Retaining wall
Removals
Fill material
AC Parking lot
Base material
driveway
A/C Paving
driveway
• Driveway approach
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Azure Hills Church Parking Lot
& Access to Fire Station
May 20, 1983
12.242
Est. Qty.
Cost/Unit
Total Cost
300'
25.00
7,500.00
28,000
s.f.
0.20
5,600.00
2500
c.y.
4.00
10,000.00
348
ton
30.00
10,440.00
600
ton
10.00
6,000.00
372
ton
30.00
11,160.00
800
s.f.
5.00
4,000.00
Engineering
Grading Plan & Preliminary field work
Construction staking
Total Engineer
Total Cost, Parking Lot and Access Road
No Fee Permit Issued
$54,700.00
3,125.00
1,400.00
$4,525.00
Share of
Cost
Church
City
7,500
-0-
3,200
2,400
8,500
1,500
10,440
-0-
_0_
6,000
_0_
11,160
1,000 3,000
$30,640 $24,060
4,525
$28,525
$59,255
ate
AFF REPI?RT ^
C R A ITEM ( X ) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. CRA-' ''%
SUBJECT: Resolution designating locations for posting documents.
A resolution designating the locations for posting of official
notices and documents has never been adopted by the Community
Redevelopment Agency. Adoption of this Resolution will
establish those locations.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CRA:
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LOCATIONS FOR POSTING
OFFICIAL NOTICES AND DOCUMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY LAW.
ME
..
PENDING Cr,nPRDY
RESOLUTION NO. CRA-83-
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDE`l=LOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALI-ERNIA, DESIG-
NATING THE POSTING REQUIREMENT OF RESOLUTIONS,
NOTICES, AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS REQ::KED BY LAW TO
BE PUBLISHED OR POSTED.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 2. All Resolutions, Notices, and rubl is Ducuments required by
law to be published or posted shall be posted in at least three (3) public
places within the City of Grand Terrace in accord -Ante with the provisions of
Section 36933 of the Government Code.
SECTION 3. That said posting shall be in the following three (3)
locations:
(a) City Hall;
(b) Grand Terrace branch of the Colton Post Office; and
(c) Terrace Hills Community Park.
ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1983.
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Grand Terrace
Community Redevelopment Agency
Approved as to Form:
Attorney
Chair —,an of the Grand Terrace
Community Redevelopment Agency
PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE JUNE 9. 1983
Council Agenda Item #<
COUNCIL MINUTES Z
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 26, 1983
A regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to
order at the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on May 26, 1983, at 6:05 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor
Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tony Petta, Councilman
Roy W. Nix, Councilman
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman
Seth Armstead, City Manager
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Eugene Nazari�k , Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Myrna Erway, City Clerk
ABSENT: None
The meeting was opened with invocation by Chaplain Samuel Geli, Loma Linda
University Medical Center, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Councilman
Rigley.
CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION
Mayor Grant read and presented a Certificate of Commendation to
Barbara Poling, Terrace Hills Junior High School Principal, in
recognition for the School being selected by the United States
Department of Education as one of five California junior high
schools to compete in the U.S. Department of Education Secondary
Recognition Program. The Mayor noted the significance of this
honor, when the number of junior high schools in California is taken
into consideration.
Mayor Grant read and presented Certificates of Commendation to the
following members of the Economic Development Advisory Committee for
their outstanding contribution of time and expertise in developing
the Economic Development Advisory Committee Report, which has proven
to be invaluable: Jerry Hawkinson; Toni Smith; John Lotspeich;
Kathy Harmon; and Chairman, John McDowell. The following members of
that Committee who were not present, but were recognized and will
receive Certificates of Commendation are: Jim Hughes; James
Traeger; John Marvin; Arlena Ware; and Ray Larsen.
Page 1
5/26/83
PROCLAMATION - "DEAF AWARENESS MONTH"
Mayor Grant read and presented a Proclamation designating the month
of May as "Deaf Awareness Month" to Mr. Ray Stallo, who is active in
various organizations for the deaf. Mr. Jerry Hawkinson assisted in
the presentation with sign language.
PUBLIC HEARING - CARD ROOMS
Mayor Grant advised this item was placed on the agenda to allow
public input and to allow the potential vendor the opportunity to
make a presentation, prior to Council considering whether or not an
ordinance should be introduced establishing rules and regulations
for Card Rooms. Stated, for the record, that his position on this
is documented in action taken approximately a year ago.
Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing
testimony for and against having a first reading of a proposed
ordinance establishing rules and regulations for Card Rooms.
Mayor Grant left the Council Chambers at 6:28 p.m.
Supporting Testimony
Attorney Frank Tetley, 23146 Vista Grande Way, representing the
petitioner, stated he felt the underlying issue is not gambling, but
fear of the unknown - not knowing the type of people this would
bring into the community, and the affect on the community. Stated
80% of the American population favors gambling. Named some of the
80 cities in California which allow card rooms. Referenced
character reference letters which were presented to Council on John
Merdichian, the petitioner.
Mayor Grant returned to the Council Chambers at 6:36 p.m.
Stated the ordinance being requested for consideration allows only
one card parlor unless and until the population within a 30-mile
radius doubles in size. Allows for Council to revoke the license.
Showed renderings of proposed facility to include the card parlor, a
restaurant and lounge. Noted there is concern that the proposed
location is adjacent to the Girl Scouts facility, and indicated the
applicant would be willing to address and meet these concerns.
Stated the facility would have 24-hour security. Questioned
locating the Girl Scout facility adjacent to railroad tracks, noting
Southern Pacific last year arrested 12,000 illegal aliens.
Estimated a minimum of $100,000 revenue to the City from the
facility. Recommended considering adoption of the proposed
ordinance.
Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry, speaking as a member of the Board of
Directors of the Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of
consideration of the ordinance; visited and took pictures of the
casino in Adelanto; noted school facilities and churches were
Page 2
5/26/83
u
M
located nearby; patrons consisted mostly of older adults and senior
citizens; stated all individuals he talked to, including the Base
Commander of George AFB, spoke well of the Casino.
Mr. John Morrissey, Chief of Police, City of Adelanto, stated in the
three years he has been there, there has been no crime connected
with the casino; spoke highly of Mr. Merdichian, stating the casino
is well -run and he gives time and money in support of community
activities.
George Foight, Public Relations, Municipal, & Government Relations,
Los Angeles, stated he is present as a friend of Mr. Merdichian for
18 years. His firm studied and prepared a report on the affects on
the City of Bell from having a card parlor, which resulted in almost
all favorable elements for the City.
Bob Yeates, 12888 Fremontia, stated he felt the Girl Scout facility
would receive better protection by having the security guards for
the card parlor nearby. Has made deliveries to card parlors for
years, and feels the patrons of the card parlors are no problem.
Recommended adopting the ordinance, then discussing whether or not
the applicant should locate here.
Chet Davis, 12072 Smallwood, Downey, a banker, spoke favorably in
behalf of Mr. Merdichian, whom he has known for 35 years; stated
card clubs in cities of Gardena, Commerce, Huntington Park, and Bell
have been a good influence on those cities, and have excellent
security, with no crime problems.
Donald Foster, incoming President of the Chamber of Commerce and
resident of Adelanto for 22 years, spoke highly of the casino in
that city, and the revenue realized; have had no problems, including
security. Spoke highly of Mr. Merdichian.
Father Robert Downey, Pastor, Adelanto Catholic Church, stated the
casino has caused no problems, has good security, and is a well -run
club. No one has come to the church due to loss of money from the
casino.
Councilman Gus Ronnebeck, City of Adelanto, spoke highly of Mr.
Merdichian, and stated there have been no problems. Over 100
residents are employed, City has received revenues of over $100,000,
and the casino and Mr. Merdichian have always assisted the community
when needed.
John Hart, Adelanto Chamber of Commerce Vice -President, stated no
complaints about the club have ever been received from any of the
military installations; Mr. Merdichian has always supported the
military and chamber programs.
Mayor Grant left the Council Chambers at 7:39 p.m.
Page 3
5/26/83
u
n
John Merdichian, 333 Kingsford Street, Monterey Park, the applicant,
stated it is his policy to work with any city in which he has a
business on any special projects; offered to answer questions.
Opposing Testimony
Pastor Jerry Folsom, 12729 Dickens Court, First Baptist Church of
Grand Terrace, stated he felt a card parlor would not be in the best
interests of this family -oriented community. Spoke against the
ordinance and recommended an ordinance banning card rooms from the
City.
Edna Steinman, 1111 Cedar Avenue, Redlands, President, San Gorgonio
Girl Scout Council, stated their board met and unanimously voted
strongly against such an establishment across from the Girl Scouts.
Stated a service center is being established to provide daily
programs and overnight camping facilities for women and girls from
San Bernardino County.
Kenneth King, 826 Brookside, Redlands, a board member of the San
Gorgonio Girl Scout Council, stated the program center is now under
construction to provide year-round activities for girls from San
Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Stated California law won't
permit such an establishment next to an elementary school, and this
facility will serve many more youth - over 20,000 girls were
involved last year.
Gail Seekins, 22418 DeSoto, a Girl Scout Leader, voiced concern for
safety if a card parlor adjacent to the Girl Scout facility. Felt
inappropriate, since they are teaching the girls morals.
S.G. Chavria, 3782 Osbun Road, San Bernardino, Executive Director,
San Gorgonio Girl Scout Council, supported all statements made by
other Girl Scout representatives; stated surrounding area was
considered prior to building the facility; read a letter written by
Bill and Bonnie Darwin opposing the card parlor.
Mayor Grant returned to the Council Chambers at 8:03 p.m.
Margaret Smith, 22627 Kentfield, stated her husband is a gambler,
and feels this establishment will encourage more gambling, which is
a disease. Doesn't want this environment in the City.
Shirley Hogue, 11955 Oakdale Avenue, voiced concern for drinking and
driving; feels children would be in jeopardy.
Rebuttal Testimony
Frank Tetley disagreed with statements made by Reverend Folsom; was
unaware of the planned facility for the Girl Scouts; had no
opportunity to discuss assistance and compromise with them, such as
building a block wall and additional acreage; input received
Page 4
5/26/83
reflects that half the gamblers are senior citizens and half are
women; City needs revenue to provide services; feels the City image
will not change.
Margaret Smith stated the citizens of Grand Terrace are the City,
and was not built by those sitting on Council.
Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing on the matter.
Mayor Grant stated he has been concerned for the need for additional
revenue, and supports viable economic development, including the
area adjacent to the freeway; believes there are better ways to
establish a viable tax base; has great regard for Mr. Tetley and his
integrity, as well as all those who have spoken; opposed considering
first reading of the ordinance.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen referenced newspaper articles written as
a result of investigative research into poker parlors in the County
of Los Angeles by two Los Angeles Times staff writers, which did not
agree with statements made tonight that there were no problems in
the cities of Bell and Gardena; feels Adelanto may not have
problems, but feels there would be problems in more highly -populated
areas. Stated articles reveal some owners and employees have
criminal records. Stated legislation is being proposed to more
closely control such establishments.
Councilman Rigley stated he thought the objective of this item was
to hold a public hearing to determine whether an ordinance would be
presented for a future first reading; however, the discussion has
been relative to the decision of whether or not to allow a card
parlor; recommended making a decision now whether or not to have
first reading of the ordinance.
Councilman Nix stated he had supported the position of hearing both
sides of the issue prior to considering first reading of the
ordinance because he did not want Council to be placed in the
position of appearing to be a proponent, which would have occurred,
had Council approved first reading of the ordinance prior to the
public hearing. Favors healthy development in the City, and free
enterprise; feels Council cannot legislate morality; doesn't feel
Council has heard testimony from an overwhelming majority of the
citizens.
Councilman Petta stated he has received numerous telephone calls,
mostly in opposition, to this proposal. Regards Mr. Tetley highly;
since his primary motive in life has been to motivate young people,
could not support this type of business adjacent to the Girl Scout
facility unless that organization indicated satisfaction with it.
Recess was called at 8:40 p.m. and reconvened at 9:03, with all
members present.
Page 5
5/26/83
Councilman Nix indicated there are two issues - the basic issue is
whether or not there should be an ordinance to permit card parlors
in the City; the second issue is a particular proposed plan and
location. The majority of the opposing testimony has been relative
to the location being near the Girl Scout facility, and those
proposed plans were not previously known by Council nor the
developer. Recommended placing this matter on the ballot for the
vote of the citizens.
Councilman Rigley indicated, with Mayor Grant and Councilman Petta
concurring, that he would not support first reading of the
ordinance, but would support placing the matter to the vote of the
people.
CC-83-116 Following further discussion, Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
Second by Councilman Rigley to reject any further action on the
proposed ordinance, and that no further hearings be held regarding
this matter, and that card rooms, in concept, not be considered in
Grand Terrace.
Mayor Grant requested clarification, indicating future Council
Members might want to consider this matter.
Councilman Nix questioned the appropriateness of the Motion,
relative to preventing future motions on this matter, stating it is
contrary to all rules of order; requested point of clarification
from the City Attorney, relative to the procedure for placing this
matter on the ballot.
The City Attorney explained the three ways matters can be placed on
the ballot for consideration by the voters: (1) Council can direct
that an item be placed on the ballot for approval of the voters; (2)
the Initiative Process, whereby anyone can place an item on the
ballot, through petitions; and (3) the Referendum Process, whereby
individuals can put an item to the vote of the people which has been
acted upon by Council.
Councilman Nix stated he felt the Motion is redundant; indicated he
would support the Motion only on the basis that it supports the same
as doing nothing.
Following discussion, Motion No. CC-83-116 carried, ALL AYES.
Recess was called at 9:22 p.m. and immediately reconvened, following
reconvening of the CRA, with all members present, for the purpose of
conducting a joint public hearing.
CIVIC CENTER PROJECT - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Attorney Nazarek advised that a Public Hearing is to be held on this
matter, pursuant to Section 33678 of the Health & Safety Code.
Notice of this Public Hearing has been given in the time, form and
Page 6
5/26/83
manner required by law, which is publication of the Notice of
Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation at least twice
preceding the hearing date. Municipal Services, Inc. prepared a
summary of information which is required under the Health & Safety
Code, on the use of tax increment, which has been placed on file
with the City Clerk and the Secretary of the Community Redevelopment
Agency at least on the day preceding the first publication of the
Notice of Hearing.
Whenever the CRA proposes to utilize tax increment revenues to
finance a public building, the Health & Safety Code requires that a
public hearing be held to determine whether or not the proposed
facility will benefit the project area, and whether tax increment
financing is the only reasonable means of financing available. The
summary of information sets forth a brief description of the methods
of financing and estimates of the amount of tax increment revenue
which would be utilized, including projections of interest and
discussion on the alternative methods of financing.
The methods of financing are: (1) Assessment Financing - the
report concludes that assessment financing would not be a viable
method because it can only be used for special benefit projects,
whereas the proposed project is of general benefit; (2) Revenue
Bonds - feeling these would not generate revenue, other than the
City's General Fund, the report concludes that those revenues would
be insufficient to accommodate the project, or if sufficient, would
adversely impact other needed future projects; (3) Mello -Roos
Community Facilities Act - the report concludes that since this is a
new, untested act, it could be subject to legal challenge, so would
not be considered a viable method until there has been more
experience with this method.
In conclusion, tax increment financing is considered to be the only
viable method of financing which will not be adverse.
Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing on the use of tax increment to
finance the civic center project, and closed Public Hearing, there
being no testimony for or against the matter.
Attorney Nazarek was questioned if the fire station could be
included in the project, and replied it is still being considered as
part of the civic center project; hopes to advise within the next 30
days whether or not the fire station financing can be included in
the second phase of the civic center project.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE, LIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND
CONSENTING TO THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES TO FINANCE THE CIVIC
CENTER PROJECT.
Page 7
5/26/83
400
CC-83-117 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilman Petta, ALL AYES, to
adopt Resolution No. 83-22.
RESOLUTION NO. CRA-83-04 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE USE OF TAX
INCREMENT REVENUES TO FINANCE THE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT.
CRA-83-118 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
ALL AYES, to adopt Resolution No. CRA-83-04.
Recess was called at 9:32 p.m. and reconvened at 9:40 p.m., with all
members present.
"SOIL STEWARDSHIP MONTH" - SLIDE PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATION
Eileen West, Secretary-Treasurer/Manager, Riverside -Corona Resource
Conservation District, gave a slide presentation on soil
conservation. Stated the District provides technical assistance to
individual property owners and governmental agencies relative to
soil or water resource problems to apply conservation measures.
This assistance includes soil survey reports and geographic
information to identify problems and providing solutions to the
problems.
Council discussed areas in the City which could benefit
from assistance from the Conservation District, such as Blue
Mountain and the hill on Mt. Vernon, at the north entrance to the
City.
Mayor Grant read and presented a Proclamation designating the month
of May as "Soil Stewardship Month."
REVENUE SHARING
Council was advised that two public hearings are required on this
matter. The public hearing held May 12 was to allow public input on
how the revenue sharing funds should be expended for FY 1983-84.
This public hearing is for the purpose of advising the public as to
how the revenue sharing funds of $68,270 are intended to be expended
for FY 1983-84, and to allow testimony for and against the proposed
use of the funds.
CC-83-119 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Rigley,
that the Revenue Sharing Funds in the amount of $68,270 be allocated
to law enforcement for the retention of the traffic officer, as
recommended by the Crime Prevention Committee, for FY 1983-84.
Mayor Grant concurred, and indicated he felt serious consideration
should be given to financial support for the Chamber of Commerce
from another funding source.
Page 8
5/26/83
Motion No. CC-83-119 carried, ALL AYES.
Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing on the matter. Dick Rollins,
22700 DeBerry, voiced support of the proposed use of the Revenue
Sharing funds for law enforcement. Mayor Grant then closed Public
Hearing, there being no opposing testimony.
CC-83-120 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to direct
the application of the Revenue Sharing Funds in the amount of
$68,270 to law enforcement for FY 1983-84.
ITEM DELETED FROM AGENDA
6C - Reject Claim No. 83-02 - Untimely Filing.
ITEM ADDED TO AGENDA
9C - Resolution opposing AB 1958(Waters)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 12, 1983
CC-83-121 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Petta,
ALL AYES, to approve the Minutes of May 12, 1983 as presented.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
John Lotspeich, 22680 Tanager, stated he had been instructed, as a
member of the Parks & Recreation Committee, to request Council
clarification relative to action taken by Council not to subsidize
adult recreational activities, such as square dancing. Stated the
square dance club is now expected to sign the agreement with the
school district for use of the school facility, which requires an
insurance policy covering $1,000,000 liability; the club is not in a
position to provide this type of coverage. Requested consideration
of the City Co -sponsoring this activity, not in payment of the fees
for the use of the school facility, but to allow the square dance
club to be covered under the City's liability insurance, which would
then allow the club to use the school facility for its activities.
In discussion, Council clarified it is not opposed to sanctioning
activities such as this, and to assume legal responsibility; the
only intent was to discontinue financially subsidizing the
activities.
CC-83-122 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to
clarify Council action regarding this matter by approving the
sanctioning of the adult activities presented by the Parks &
Recreation Committee.
Following clarification that the City should continue to pay the
school district the fees for the use of the school facilities by
adult activities, such as the square dancing club, and that the
Page 9
5/26/83
affected organizations should then reimburse the City for the fees
paid, Motion No. CC-83-122 carried, ALL AYES.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item 6A, Check Register No. 052683, was removed from the Consent
Calendar. Item 6C was deleted from the Agenda.
CC-83-123 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilman Petta, ALL AYES, to
approve Item 6B - Authorize Mayor to execute, and City Clerk to
record Notice of Completion - Parkway Landscaping, Barton/Palm
Project - American West Landscape (GTC#83-07).
CHECK REGISTER NO. 052683
Following clarification on Warrant No. P3754, that the park shelter
CC-83-124 erected was a bulletin board, Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No.
052683 as presented.
ORAL REPORTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
FUND REQUEST - LANDSCAPE BARTON/PALM TRIANGLE
The Planning Director advised that the Planning Commission is
requesting that Council authorize the expenditure of $500 for the
purpose of planting windmill palms and flowers within the triangle,
with a portion of the $500 to go to next year's budget to replace
the flowers. Stated the major concern is for the ivy presently
planted there.
Consideration of this matter was deferred to the meeting of June 9,
since a Planning Commissioner was not present to explain the request
and position of the Planning Commission.
PARKS_ & RECREATION COMMITTEE
Chairman Dick Rollins reported the following: (1) Windmill Palms are
on the prohibited tree list; (2) An excellent presentation was given
by a firm which provides contract recreational services to cities at
the last Committee meeting; Committee endorses contracting for
services; (3) Requested $150 allocation to plant tree in park for
Ray Robles, which was purchased with donations.
CC-83-125 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Petta,
ALL AYES, to approve the expenditure of $150 to plant a tree in the
Terrace Hills Community Park in memory of Ray Robles.
Page 10
5/26/83
ENERGY COMMITTEE
Due to the fact that this Committee apparently does not meet, and
does not furnish any information, Motion by Councilwoman
Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Nix, to dissolve the Energy
Committee.
Mayor Grant disagreed with taking action on this matter until the
Committee has been questioned on its intent for the future of the
Committee; feels energy is a crucial issue.
Following discussion, the Motion was withdrawn by Councilwoman
Pfennighausen, with concurrence of Councilman Nix. Staff was
directed to contact the Energy Committee to request a written status
report from the Committee in two weeks.
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE
Minutes of May 11 were included in the Council Packet. Committee
Member Ann Petta advised that the contest to select a City Motto is
underway, with flyers advertising the contest being distributed
throughout the schools, and displayed at City Hall.
CC-83-126 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Petta,
ALL AYES, to appoint Barbara Bay us to the Historical & Cultural
Activities Committee to fill the unexpired term of Koleta Green, to
expire June 30, 1986.
CC-83-127 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL
AYES, to accept the resignation of Ed O'Neal from the Crime
Prevention Committee, with regret.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
A committee member was present earlier to give a report, but was
unable to remain. A committee report dated April 21 was included in
the Council Packet.
CITY ENGINEER REPORT
The City Engineer advised that a status report was included in the
Council Packet relative to the demolition of a structure at 12610
Michigan Street.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilwoman Pfennighausen reported the following: (1) Fifty-seven
elderly people who were unable to attend the meeting signed a
petition opposing a card parlor; (2) Recommended the Council Members
coordinate and notify the City Clerk of vacation plans, to ensure
that three members would not be gone at the same time.
Page 11
5/26/83
n
Mayor Grant reported the following: (1) Disagreed with the
exp anation provided on the use of funds collected by Riverside
Highland Water Company for late charges; (2) Served as a Judge at a
Spelling Bee held at Terrace Hills Junior High School.
Staff was advised that no Council Members would attend the upcoming
Citrus Belt Meeting.
BARTON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
The City Engineer stated concern was expressed at the recent Public
Workshop Session relative to the structural section as recommended
by the Soils Engineer, with indication given that a second opinion
should be solicited which could possibly reduce the construction
cost; the initial soils report cost $3,300, and the recommendations
made were based on Caltrans' standards; requested Council direction
on this matter.
Recess was called at 11:35 p.m. and reconvened at 11:43 p.m., with
all members present.
Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
to get another soils report.
Councilman Nix spoke in opposition; stated the same data would be
furnished another firm, which could result in the same or more
stringent recommendations, which the City would have to accept.
Councilman Rigley questioned the results since they differed so
greatly with the estimate provided.
Following further discussion and clarification, Councilman Rigley
withdrew the Motion, with concurrence of Councilwoman
Pfennighausen.
Staff was authorized to proceed as originally planned.
FIRE STATION ACCESS
The City Engineer advised that a meeting was held May 11 with Mr.
Bader to discuss the alternatives for the access, and to establish
the pro rata share of costs for both entities to construct a
retaining wall to provide additional parking and to reconstruct the
church parking lot for a total cost of $59,255, as shown in the
Staff Report dated May 20, 1983, Subject: Azure Hills Church Parking
Lot & Access to Fire Station. Recommended Staff be authorized to
proceed, approval of the formula for shared costs, and preparation
of an agreement.
It was indicated in discussion that the costs would be shared
approximately 50/50; Council questioned if there would be a legal
easement and recommended including the City's share of costs in the
Page 12
5/26/83
Fire Station financing. The City Attorney advised there would be a
blanket easement.
CC-83-128 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilman Petta, to: (1)
Authorize Staff to proceed with the design of the Azure Hills Church
Parking Lot and access roadway; (2) approve, based on the
preliminary cost estimates, as shown in the May 20 Staff Report, as
a formula for sharing of the final costs to proceed with the
project; and (3) authorize preparation of an agreement between the
Azure Hills Church and the City for the required additional access
through the Church property.
Following clarification that this item should'be placed on the next
CRA Agenda for approval, since it is a CRA project, and that
consideration should be given to including this item on the County's
list of projects, Motion No. CC-83-128 carried, ALL AYES.
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL/JOBS BILL
The City Engineer advised that Council had previously approved use
of Jobs Bill funding for this project, and the County has agreed;
however, since the Jobs Bill Funds are not available at this time,
recommended that the funds be appropriated to the City from the
County's General Fund at this time, with the City's portion to be
returned to the County's Contingency Fund when the Jobs Bill Funds
become available.
CC-83-129 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilman Nix, ALL AYES, to
request that the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors advance
to the City of Grand Terrace its Jobs Bill allocation in the amount
of $23,921.00, from the County's Contingency Fund, with the
$23,921.00 to be repaid to the County's Contingency Fund when the
Jobs Bill funding becomes available.
RFP REQUEST - RECREATIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
The Community Services Director stated he had investigated the
feasibility of contracting for recreational services, as directed by
the City Manager; contacted and received positive response from
agencies which currently contract for these services. Stated the
Staff Report dated May 17, 1983, Subject: Contract for Recreational
Services, summarizes the information received and Staff's
recommendation to approve circulation of an RFP.
It was indicated, in Council discussion, that there are only two
firms in the State which provide this service, which would include
recreational programs for all age levels, from pre-school age
children up through senior citizens; considered whether the contract
award should be sole source; questioned whether timing is a problem.
Page 13
5/26/83
n
n
The Community Services Director advised the students will be
notified prior to school dismissal that recreational programs will
be provided; stated contract award could be made the second week of
June, and would only result in a one week delay.
CC-83-130 Motion by Mayor Grant, Second by Councilman Rigley, ALL AYES, to
authorize Staff to circulate an RFP for contracting recreational
services, with the results to be returned to Council for contract
award June 23.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING THE DISCHARGE OF
WASTES INTO THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE. (First Reading)
The City Attorney read the title of the Ordinance.
The City Engineer advised that, as a condition of certain grants,
the EPA and State Water Board are requiring all operators of
wastewater treatment plants to require pre-treatment of industrial
waste before it reaches the sewage treatment plant, to minimize the
loads and cost of the operation. The proposed ordinance will
primarily affect industrial, and eventually commercial dischargers.
At this time, J & L Plating is the only firm which will be affected
by this ordinance within the City; they are aware of this ordinance;
it is not apparent that it will cause that firm major problems.
That firm, and possibly service stations, will be monitored which
need to have oil separators. At this time there are no restaurants
or commercial firms which would fall within the jurisdiction of this
ordinance. Cited corrections to be made on Exhibit "B" to the
ordinance.
In discussion it was clarified that residential units are not
affected by this ordinance; that there presently is an ordinance
prohibiting brines from regenerating units into the sewer system;
and that newly constructed residential units, and those which are
phased out, require the installation of on -site regenerating units.
CC-83-131 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Nix, ALL
AYES, to approve first reading of the Ordinance, by title only.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-23 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, STRONGLY
OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 1958 (WATERS) AND URGING
LEGISLATION TO HALT IMPROPER CAMPAIGN TACTICS.
The City Clerk recommended adoption of the subject resolution,
stating she feels the present laws governing absentee ballots have
some loopholes which are being effectively used by candidates and
campaign workers to solicit votes; that absentee ballots are
becoming the determining factor in election results; and voiced
concern that this proposed legislation to further liberalize the
Page 14
5/26/83
n
current laws will totally eliminate any control the election
officials might have over the absentee balloting process; that
democracy could totally be undermined; and that the election process
will no longer be controlled by the people, but by special interest
groups.
Mayor Grant spoke in favor of adopting the proposed Resolution,
feeling the proposed legislation is contrary to the intent of the
electoral process, and could create a capacity for fraud.
CC-83-132 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
ALL AYES, to adopt Resolution No. 83-23.
ADJOURN
The regular City Council Meeting adjourned at 12:25 a.m. The next
regular meeting will be held on June 9, 1983 at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
APPROVED:
Mayor
Page 15
5/26/83
66 PENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL
GRAND TERRACE
June 9, 1983 _.
COUNCIL' AGENDA LTEKA '1A
*ECK REGISTER NO. 060983
PAGE NO
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83-121
DATE 06/09/83
IUCHER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
NO
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
A0UNT
�.1F
RANDALL ANSTINE
LOCAL MILEAGE,ANSTINE
13-4430-271
27.25
11186 27.25,1
i
SETH ARMSTEAD
i
LOCAL MILEAGE,SETH
10-4120-271
42.25
11187 42.25
BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER,FINANCE
10-4190-238
14826
8.30
BOTTLED WATER,CITY MANAG
10-4190-238
14827
8.30
11188 16.60
CALIF. ENERGY COMMISSION
ENERGY LOAN PAY 44 (FINA
10-2900-000
83-000
795.65
111891 795.651
I
C.S.M.F.O.
MEMBERSHIP,CSMFO/CBD
10-4120-265
15.00
MEhBERSHIP,CSMFO/CBD
10-4140-265
15.00
P3761 30.00'
1983/84
C H J MATERIALS LABORATORY
i
CABLE TV INSPECTION
10-4170-254
1562b
761.00
1119(r 761.001
t
COLTON, CITY OF
i
vj.V..D.CHARGES 6/83
21-4570-704
18090.77
P3762 18090.77'•
Ii
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGEI
i
LOAN #5 FY 82/a3
10-4200-701
184000.00
P3760 184000.001
i
DAN'S 1-04NMIOINER CENTER
I
REPAIR GREEN MACHINE
10-4180-246
7466
50.10
11191 50.10;
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
DEF.COMP, P/R END, 5/20/E10-2164-000
575.00l
i
DEF.COI',P. P/R END. 5/20/
10-2170-0G0
9.811
DEF.COMP. P/R END. 5/20/
10-4120-140
554.51i
DEF.COMP. P/R END. 5/20/
10-4125-140
362.06
I
I , i
GKAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83- 1 2 1
PAGE NO.
DATE 06/09/83
IUCHER
NO
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
I WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
At,AOUNT
DEF.COMP. P/R END, 5/20/110-4140-140
554.13
DEF.COMP. P/R END, 5/20/P1U-4180-140
210.25
DEF.COMP. P/R END. 5/20/6i13-4430-140
176.52
DEF.COMP. P/R END. 5/20/�21-4572-140
100.03
P3765 2542.31I
ILENE DUGHMAN
FRAMES FOR CERTIFICATES
10-4110-210
38.50
LOCAL MILEAGEIILENE
10-4125-271
3.50
11192 42.001
I
ALEXANDER GRANT & COMPANY
COMPUTER SERVICE MAY 83
10-4420-255
06U94
923.45
11193' 923,451-
HARBER COMPANY
PATCH STREETSIVARIOUS LO
16-4900-255
2252
1012.00
j
BOBCAT RENTAL STREET REP
16-4900-255
2237
160.00'11194I
1172.001-
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL
RENT SKIP LOADER,REPAIR
SKIP LOADER,STORM CLEAN-
10-4631-255
10-4631-255
202237
202115
156.35
155.49
I
11195I 311.841'
BARTON ROAD
IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED
I
STREET SiVEEP. 5/24/83
18-4908-255
2390
325.04
STREET SNEEP.5/3/83
18-4908-255
2252
162.52
STREET SoEEP. 5/10/83
18-4908-255
2251
.325.n4
STREET SWEEP. 5/17/83
18-4908-255
d365
284.41!11196'
1097.01;
KICAK & ASSOCIATES
STAFF ENGINEERING
10-41 20-601
775.90
GENERAL ENGINEERING
10-4170-250
1441.00
PLANNING
1 U-4170-252
1938.10
i
GROUP W TV
10-417 U-254
1158.60
i
COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC
10-47.70-255
419.00
BUILDING & SAFETY
1 U-4330-255
I
2015.00
i
P/W ENGINEERING
1 U-4610-255
1975.50
ARCHITEC BARRIER REMOVAL
704,00
111-4902-6UO
LIGHTING ASSESS. DIST.
16-4510-236
I 1161.16
i
RE CONST. BART. MV NE CITY LIMITS
16-4930-600
5336.70
I
i
i
i
GRAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83-121
PAGE NO
DATE 06/09/63
NO.
N0.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED �
WARRANT CHECK
11 RITT[N
-
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
S/W LANDSCAPING BART.MV-ARLISS
18-4903-600
32.00
i
WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
21-4572-601
141,.00
11197�
17097.981,
ENG SERVICES 4/25-5/22/83
KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION
PAPER TOWELS,TRASH CAN .10-4180-245
73405
54.33
11198
54.33
LINERS
VIRGIL LIVELY
j
CROSS.GUARU 5/16-5/27/83
17-4910-250
127.20
111991
127.201
i
MICHAEL LUNA
LOCAL MILEAGE,5/9-5/19,L
10-4180-271
98.73
11200
98.731
JEAN 14YERS
�
CROSS.GUARD 5/16-5/27/83
17-4910-250
127.20
11201
127.2U';
I
I
NAT'L TRUST/HISTORICAL PRES
PUBLICATION,NT/HP
10-4804-210
50.00
11202
50.001
HISTORICAL COMMITTEE
j
PACIFIC TELEPHO14E
PHONE C/H 5/14/83
1U-4190-235
609.01
COMP PHONE 5/14
10-4420-235
35.53
112031
644.54
I
PAINE NEBBER CASH FUND
� I
i
RETIRE.P/R Er4D.5/20/83
10-2167-000
44.37
RETIRE.P/R END.5/20/83
1U-4120-140
379.8b
RETIRE.P/R EiND.5/20/83
10-4125-140
248.04
RETIRE.P/R END.5/20/83
10-4140-140
314.41
i
KETIRE.P/R EI4D.5/20/83
10-418U-140
144.04
RETIRE.P/R END.5/20/83
13-4430-140
120.93
RETIRE.P/R E14D.5/20/83
21-4572-140
68.53
P3766,
1320.20'
STEVE PANDZA C014STRUCTORS
I
PAYMENT 91 (PArvDZA)
18-4903-255
b3U21
5600.00
PAYMENT #1 (PA[ADZA)
18-4903-256
83021
3647.50
11204�
9247.50!
S/W LANDSCAPING BART.M/V ARLIS
}
BALANCE OF CONTRACT $9092.
I
r.
i
I
Lm
rl
GRAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO
83-121
PAGE NO
DATE 06/09/83
IUCHER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANTCHECK
WRITTEN
N0.
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
PETRA ENTERPRISES
I
RUBBER STAIAPrNAME PLATE
10-4140-210
8.85
11205 8.851
PETTY-CASHrPEGGY TROTTIER
COUNCIL COFFEE FUND
10-4120-210
373
5.31
CONVERTA PLUG, CUPS
10-4125-210
383
8.64
I
110 SKID TAPE
10-4180-245
36b
7.90
LIGHT BULBS
10-4180-245
369
1.89
KEYS & BLADES
10-4180-245
371
2.33
i
DRILL BIT
10-4180-245
374
.67
PAINT,CITY HALL SIGN
10-4160-245
377
6.87
RENT DOLLY
10-4160-245
378
b.60
i
GAS FOR LAWNh10WER
10-4180-245
379
2.57
PAINT,tvASHERS,PAINT SLEEVIO-4180-245
380
7.64
(JUTS & BOLTS
10-4180-245
381
5.21
i
SHARPEN HEDGE TRIMMER
10-4180-245
385
7.54
CAN OPENER
10-4190=210
37U
1.37
i
MAP UPDATE
10-4190-210
372
1.0b
MAP UPDATE
10-4190-210
384
1.06
11206I 66.861
I
PETTY-CASITYPEGGY TROTTIER
j
PHOTO,HISTORICAL COMM.
10-46U4-220
362
12.72
i
SIGN POST►NUTS & BOLTS
13-4430-245
364
10.30
NUTS & BOLTS,PARK
13-4430-245
365
2.14
6ASHERS,NUTS & BOLTS,PAR
13-4430-245
366
3.01
PARK IRRIGATION,PART
13-4430-245
375
11.28
SQUEEZE UISPENSER
16-4900-255
367
2.86
NUT&BOLTS FOR STOP SIGN
16-4900-255
376
I 1.89111207
44.20
SAN BERNARDINO,AUDITOR/CONT
i I
PARK CITES13/1-4/30/83
10-22UO-000
75.00
1120& 75.00
SAN AERNARDINO,COUNTY OF
I
EOUIP,V;ORK ON STORM DRAII,10-4631-255
bG092
816.65I
BARRICADE LIGHTS
16-4900-255
GG092
20.74111209I
837.39
i
SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF
i
DUmP.CHARGES 4/18-5/12/8
18-4908-255
842
156.50i11210
156.50i
I
t
I
GNANO TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83- 12 1
PAGE NO.
DATE 06/09/83
)OCHER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
bVRITTEN
NO
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
N
—7—
r— AMOJN i I
SCHhIITZ PHOTOGRAPHY
REPRODUCE PRINTS (5)
10-4804-220
9438
63.60
11211 63.60I
HISTORICAL COMMITTEe
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK
FED.P/R TAX DEPOSIT 5/83
10-2161-000
3081.23
P3759 3081.23
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
REPAIR SIGNAL,BART/MV
16-4909-255
33285
36.35
11212� 36.351
i i
SO. CALIF. EDISON COMPANY
f
5/11/83 BILLING C/H EDIS
10-4190-238
124.12
5/11/83 BILLING B/P LIGH
13-4430-2"38
212.41
5/11/83,SPRINKLERl PARK,EC13-4430-238
10.34
SI6NALS,(3)5/11/83 BILLI116-4510-238
266.39
STREET LIGHTS 3/1-4/30/8
16-4510-238
4116.33
11213 4729.591
i I
SO, CALIF. JOINT P01.1ERS
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL AND
10-4190-260
8277,00
112141 8277.00
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COVERAGE
4/1/83-6/30/84
STOCKWELL & BINNEY
PAPER CLIPS,LABELS
10-4120-210
348822i
4.60
PAPER CLIPSrLAi3ELS
10-4125-210
346622
4.60
FILING CABINETS (2)
10-4125-7UO
2617361
237.09
11215 246.29-
I
THE SUN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
10-4125-230
6409
38.50
11216 38.50;
TRI-COUNTY FIRE FUUIPHENT C
SERVICE FIDE EXTINGUISHE
10-4180-245
2855
32.50
112171 32.501
VERTICAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
I
PROCESS CITES 4/1-4/30/8-10-4412-255
83005
133.50
11218' 133.50,
XEROX CORPORATION
`
DEVELOPER FOR COPIER
10-4190-210
b23593
58.00
i I
GRAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83-121
PAGE NO
DATE 06/09/83
MCHER
NO.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
RENT COPIER14/63 (FIN.)
10-4190-240
941508
f
122.74 11219 180.74�,
J & E BLADE RENTALS
CUT/REMOVE TREES,VIVIEND
16-4900-255
9'25.00 11220 925.00
NATIO14AL CHEh1SEARCH
TEXITE (PATCH CITY STREET16-4900-255
53091
574.39 11221 574.39
t
I
VIC PFENNIGHAUSEN
SUPPLIES rEMERGENCY GENE
10-4808-606
30.00 P375& 30.00
G. RANDELL
REFUND Y.W.D. RANDELL
21-3114-000
2.59 11221 2.59
PAYROLL
PAYROLL E14DING 5/20/83
10-2161-000
1475.37-,
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-2162-000
229.44'
PAYROLL ENDIivG 5/20/83
10-2163-000
86.521*�
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-2164-000
575.001
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/63
10-2167-000
44.37
PAYROLL ENDIivG 5/20/83
10-2170-Ov0
9.81-
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-4120-110
306356 !
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-4125-110
2000:30I I
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-4140-110
3061.49
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
10-41tl0-110
1161.65
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/63
13-4430-110
975.25
PAYROLL ENDING 5/20/83
21-4572-110
552.67 0 8394.41,
I
i
I
i
I
1
i
I _
I
t
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 7
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 83-=21 DATE 06/09/83
PAYEE
WARRANT CHECK
OUCHER
N0.
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
VuRITTEN
49115.48
PREPAID
217488.92
ACCRUED
.00
TOTAL
266604,40�
RECAP BY FUND
PRE -PAID
NRITTEN
FUNS :0
197404.22
23589.921
FUNS _1
.00
704.001
FUN' _3
1272.70
276.73
I
FUNZ _o
.00
13613.831
FUN- _7
.00
254.40
I
FUNS' _ 6
.00
10533.011
FUN: =1
18812.00
143.591
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BES- == MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFOR(LISTED CHECKS iFOR PAYMENT OF CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED E'• AND ARE NECESSP'RY AND APPROPRIATE EXRENDITQRES FOR THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY. I
DWARD R. CLARK
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE OFFICER
� Date:
AFF SREPtIRT
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4B
SUBJECT: Resolution changing one of the locations for the posting
of official notices and documents.
The original resolution, adopted November 30, 1978, designating
the locations for posting notices and documents, reflects
one of the locations as Security Pacific Bank. This
location is felt to be unsuitable, since the Bank only
keeps the notices and documents in a book, and has no
desire to place a bulletin board within the bank to
post the notices.
A large, glass -enclosed, locked bulletin board has been
placed at the Terrace Hills Community Park. Staff is
requesting that this location replace the posting location
of the Security Pacific Bank, since the documents can be
posted there for public view, at all times, even on
weekends.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-18 AND
AMENDING THE POSTING LOCATIONS.
ME
(40 PENDING
COUNCIL APPRVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 83-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 78-18 AND AMENDING THE POSTING REQUIREMENT OF
ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, NOTICES, AND PUBLIC DOCU-
MENTS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISHED OR POSTED.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has determined
a need to change one of its locations for posting of Ordinances, Resolutions,
Notices, and Public Documents to a location more available to the public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Resolution No. 78-18 is hereby rescinded in its entirety.
SECTION 2. All Ordinances, Resolutions, Notices, and Public Ducuments
required by law to be published or posted shall be posted in at least three
(3) public places within the City of Grand Terrace in accordance with the
provisions of Section 36933 of the Government Code.
SECTION 3. That said posting shall be in the following three (3)
locations:
(a) City Hall;
(b) Grand Terrace branch of the Colton Post Office; and
(c) Terrace Hills Community Park.
ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1983.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City Council
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Mayor of the City of GrandTerrace
and of the City Council thereof.
f
Date: June 1, 198
STAFF
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM NO. LI
SUBJECT: STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORIZATION RESOLUTION
The State of Caliornia allows local government agencies to purchase surplus
property at their Fullerton warehouse. Presently, Ed Clark and David
Carmany are the only staff members authorized to make purchases at the
warehouse. Since the vast majority of the surplus property is maintenance
oriented equipment, it is requested that the Community Services Director
Randy Anstine and the Assistant to the City Manager Tom Coyle be added
to the authorization list to purchase surplus property, and the name -of
Dave Carmany be deleted.
Staff Recommends that the Council:
ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION THAT WOULD RESCIND ALL PREVIOUS COUNCIL
RESOLUTIONS AND NAME ED CLARK; RANDY ANSTINE AND TOM COYLE AS THE
CITY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE
STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY
RLA
go
8 PENDING CITY
UNCIL APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 83-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 80-46, AND AMENDING THE AUTHORIZING REPRE-
SENTATIVES TO ACQUIRE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY
FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS
PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, the State of California is responsible for administration of
the Federal Surplus Personal Property Program; and
WHEREAS, this program is designed to help public agencies and
non-profit organizations secure excess equipment at low cost;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace hereby orders the City Officials whose names, titles, and
signatures are listed below, shall be and are hereby authorized as
representatives of the City of Grand Terrace, California, to acquire property
under the terms and conditions shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
NAME
TITLE
Edward R. Clark Finance/Administrative
Services Officer
Randall L. Anstine Community Services Director
Thomas M. Coyle Administrative Assistant
SIGNATURE
ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1983.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of GrandMayor of the City of GrandTerrace
Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof.
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
� D6/6/83
StAFF
REPOI�T ate:
C R A ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO. Lf 1'1
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN SERVICE CLUBS AND CIVIC ACTIVITIES
BY CITY OFFICERS AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
Background:
It is recommended by staff that Council determine a policy regarding expenses of
city officers and supervisory employees when participating in civic clubs and other
community organizations.
These are normally considered ordinary employee business expenses for the purpose of
calculating personal income tax. Normally such expenses are not reimbursable for
city officers and city employees, but the need for participation in such civic
organizations and service clubs is of importance for such city officials and
employees to effectively and efficiently serve the community.
Staff recommends that the Council:
APPROVE THE ATTACHED PROPOSED RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN SERVICE CLUBS
AND CIVIC ACTIVITIES BY CITY OFFICERS AND SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL
SA:lo
(CC82/71/32)
ti ,PENDING CIT
COUNCIL APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 83-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO PARTICIPA-
TION IN SERVICE CLUBS AND CIVIC ACTIVITIES BY CITY
OFFICERS AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine policy regarding expense of City
officers and supervisory employees when participating in service clubs and
other community organizations; and
WHEREAS, in business, these are normally considered ordinary employee
business expenses for the purpose of calculating personal income tax; and
WHEREAS, such expenses are not reimbursable for City officers and
supervisory employees as a matter of policy, but the need for participation in
such organizations is of equal or more importance for such City officers and
employees than for officers and employees of private firms;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That participation by City officers and supervisory
employees in service clubs and other community organizations is necessary and
desirable in order for the City government and such public officers and
employees to effectively and efficiently serve the community, and that expense
incurred by such officers and employees in such activities is ordinary and
reasonable business expense.
SECTION 2. That, although such expenses of such officers and
employees are not subject to reimbursement under existing City policy, City
officers and supervisory employees be urged to participate in service clubs
and organizational activities as a part of the duties of their position.
SECTION 3. That this Resolution includes employees such as the City
Manager and Department Heads, and it is principally concerned with this type
of employment.
ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1983.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of GrandMayor of the City of GrandTerrace
Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof.
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
7
a
C-1 `'t OF GLENDORA C,TY MALL E,S- POOTH1.-L DLID PH 335-4071
':LEND�FA CALIFORNIA-91740
May 13, 1983
Seth Armstead, City Manager
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Seth:
I am sending you a copy of the resolution
that we talked about in Sacramento. W-- gin I
was recently audited by the Internal =venue
Service, they allowed all my deductions for
service clubs as employee expense beca-se I
had that resolution with me.
I hope to visit your city during the
next month. Thank you and Ed for your hospi-
tality at the Sacramento airport.
Sincerely,
CITY OF GLENDORA
S. S w z
Finance Director
SS:slk
Enclosure
MAY 161983
Y OF R��'� TERRAC -
P R I D E O F T H E F O O T H I L L S
i� 4 Date: 5/25/83
STAFF REPOR I
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. q E
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SERVICE TRANSFER OF FUNDS
Staff has been recently notified that the following line item is reflecting
a negative balance: STREET SWEEPING #18-4908-255. The reason this line
item is overdrawn is due to the fact that an unexpected expenditure took
place. The purchase of 57 street sweeping signs, posts, anchors and
hardware totaling $4,011.65 forced the account into a negative balance.
Staff has determined that a total of $4,511.00 will be needed to carry
this line item through the end of the current fiscal year.
Staff Recommends That the Council:
APPROVE TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,511.00 FROM THE BALANCE
FORWARD TO LINE ITEM #18-4908-255, LEAVING A REMAINING BALANCE OF
$92,485.00.
RLA:rla
Date.
AFF REP@RT
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A(1)
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Request for Funding of $500 to landscape
the Barton/Palm Triangle
Council deferred action and consideration on this item to this
Council Meeting, since a Planning Commissioner was not present
at the time this matter came up for consideration.
The Planning Commission has been requested to ensure a Commissioner
will be present at this meeting.
This matter was listed at 7A(1) on the May 26 Agenda. Please
place that material in your packet for this meeting.
ME
6/83
StAFF REPOT Date: 6/
C R A ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO. S C /
SUBJECT: ENERGY COMMITTEE
Each member of the Energy Committee has been mailed a questionaire asking:
1. Do you wish to continue as a regular member of the Energy Committee?
2. Do you feel the Energy Committee should continue meeting on a regular monthly
basis?
Responses have not yet been received.
Staff recommends that the Council:
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
TC:Io
(CC31)
SKAFF REPtRT lao
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5E(1)
SUBJECT: Resignation of Evelyn Strawn from Crime Prevention Committee
The attached letter of resignation was received from Evelyn
Strawn.
With this resignation, there will be two members remaining
on the Crime Prevention Committee - Jim Hodder and JoAnne
Coffeen.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF EVELYN STRAWN FROM THE CRIME PREVENTION
COMMITTEE, WITH REGRET.
rC
s
May 20, 1933
The Grand Terrace City Council
Grand Terrace City Hall
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324
TO WHOI1 IT MAY CONCE`?":
It will be impossible for me to continue serving on the Crime
Prevention Committee of Grand Terrace.
I herewith submit my resignation, to be effective �A1ay 20, 1982.
Evelyn Rae Strawn
220.17 Grand Terrace Road
Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324
ERS:jgh
MAY 2 51983
late
*� ~S4*AFF REPf3R-f
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX ) MEETING DATE: 6-9-83
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of adoption of Ordinance
regulating the discharge of wastes into the sewerage system.
Council approved first reading of this proposed ordinance at
the meeting of May 26, 1983, and set second reading and
Public Hearing for June 9 at 7:30 p.m.
The Notices of Public Hearing have been posted for this matter
in a timely fashion, as required by law.
Please include the ordinance, which was furnished to you on
May 26, in your packet for this meeting. Enclosed is a revised
Exhibit "B" to the Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
(1) Hold Public Hearing on this matter at 7:30 p.m.
(2) Adopt the Ordinance, by title only.
Encl: Revised Exhibit "B"
ME
Date: May 20, 1983
S
AFFREPORT 12.03
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (x ) MEETING DATE: May 26, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Ordinance Regulating Waste Discharge within the City of Grand Terrace
Attached you will find the ordinance which should be considered by the City Council
for regulating the industrial waste discharge within the City of Grand Terrace.
This ordinance is a requirement of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
State Water Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board
on the users of the Colton wastewater treatment plant.
The City Council of the City of Colton has adopted this ordinance and it will
go into effect sometime in June.
The City is required to adopt the same ordinance to regulate the industrial dis-
chargers within the City of Grand Terrace. Ultimately through enforcement of this
ordinance, all of the industrial and certain commercial dischargers will be
affected by this ordinance. Specifically at this time, J & L Plating on Main
Street, all of the service stations, and some of the restaurants within the City
will be required to meet the requirements and provide sufficient data indicating
that they are meeting the discharge required by this ordinance.
Staff recommends that the City Council:
CONSIDER THE FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY.
JK/lbk
Attachment
r S 1"A F F R E P C'k T late: ,
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7,4
SUBJECT: NON -CONFORMING SIGNS
At the Council meeting of May 12, 1983, Staff offered to provide a list of
non -conforming -signs to Council prior to taking any action or sending out warnings.
Please find attached a list of non -conforming signs in Grand Terrace as of June 1,
1983.
Possible alternatives might be:
1. Direct staff to enforce ordinance as written.
2. Direct staff to use their own judgement in enforcing the ordinance.
3. Request the Planning Commission to review the ordinance in light of its impact
on this City's business community.
4. Do nothing.
Staff would appreciate Council direction as to the stringency with which you desire
the sign ordinance pursued.
Staff recommends that the Council:
PROVIDE STAFF WITH DIRECTION REGARDING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE SIGN CODE.
TC:lo
Encl.
(CC99/70)
NON -CONFORMING SIGNS
As of June 1, 1983
La Casita Cleaners
- Small signs on fence
Tony Petta Real Estate
- Roof signs
Valley Bank
- Banner "13% auto loans"
Grand Terrace Hardware
- Roof signs
Oversized wall sign
Monument sign --"Trustworthy Hardware"
Village Inn
- Beer and pool arrow
Greg's Market
- Roof signs and wall signs
Yorgies Upholstery
- Banners and monument sign (too high)
Ross's Liquor's
- Roof signs and window signs
Ontario Savings
- Time and temperature (oversized)
Union 76
- Excess wall signs on tire racks
"Make us your auto care center" on light post
Red Carpet Realty
- Illegal monument sign
La Tijera Beauty Salon
- Monument signs (too high)
Kiddie Karousel Preschool
- Offsite sign
RMG Tools
- Roof signs
Oversized wall sign
Texaco Station
- 2 oversized monument signs
1 roof s i gn
1 portable, oversized "Car Wash" sign
2 portable, oversized price signs
1 oversized window siqn
Adcock Auto Supply
- 1 vehicular sign and banners
Mobile Station
- 2 portable signs "Mobil 1 Oil"
"Winston"
Gas Up Station
- Oversized monument
2 portable signs "Salem Cigarettes"
Glass and Mirror
- Portable sign
Unit 2 Park Center
U-Stor - Oversized monument sign
NON -CONFORMING SIGNS
As of June 1, 1983
Page 2
Yum Yum Donuts
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Broasted Chicken
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Red Baron Pizza
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Musso's Deli
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Stater Bros
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Sprouse Reitz
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Grand Terrace Liquors
- Oversized or over
height window
signs
Keeney Bldg (Mt. Vernon)
- Overheight monument
sign
Real Estate:
Foxboro (Griffin)
- Offsite signs:
Palm & Preston
DeBerry & City
Park
West end of DeBerry
- 2 flags --Palm & Observation
Dr.
North Cliffe (Pacesetter)
- Offsite sign west
end of DeBerry
- 2 flags on Pico
Cardinal Terrace Homes - 1 flag and 1 sign
(Michigan & Cardinal Ct)
Honey Ridge (Griffin) - 6 flags
TC:lo
(099/70)
R__.,PS] AF�F
.. Date: 6/6 g3 (u111ni0 /
C R A ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM MEETING DATE: June 9, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF IMPACTION FOR GRAND TERRACE, TERRACE VIEW AND TERRACE HILLS
SCHOOLS TO IMPLEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 54 AUTHORIZING BUILDERS FEES REQUESTED
BY COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION
Background:
At a regular meeting on May 5, 1983 the Board of Education of the Colton Unified
School District took action regarding anticipated student impaction in the Grand
Terrace Schools. The Board requested the Grand Terrace City Council implement City
Ordinance No. 54 authorizing builders fees and/or land dedication.
The District has requested to meet with the Council and staff to prepare supportive
data. Attached is a copy of the Board agenda of May 5, 1983 giving the background
on school enrollment and projected figures affecting the Grand Terrace area.
It is pointed out that projections for 1983-84 indicate there will be sufficient
classroom spaces to house existing pupils. However, if growth (new housing) were to
occur the school district would be unable to meet the demand.
The Board agenda pointed out to the City Council that in order to implement the
ordinance it is required that the Board of Education for the Colton Unified School
District specify the mitigation to alleviate the impaction.
1. Double sessions.
2. Year -around schools.
3. Movement of students from one area to another.
4. Securing LeRoy Green emergency building funds.
5. Securing builders' fees.
6. Utilizing RDA funds.
7. Do nothing.
8. Modify school attendance boundaries.
9. Utilization of bond money.
10. Utilization of District funds.
11. Sell surplus sites.
12. Sell surplus property.
13. Use facilities in other disticts.
14. Use inter -district attendance agreements.
The Board after evaluating methods of mitigation of overcrowding recommended the
City Council of Grand Terrace adopt Ordinance No. 54 relating to school facility
fees and dedications.
STAFF REPORT: DECLARATION OF IMPACTION FOR GRAND TERRACE, TERRACE VIEW AND TERRACE
HILLS SCHOOLS TO IMPLEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 54 AUTHORIZING BUILDERS FEES
REQUESTED BY COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION
Page 2
June 9, 1983
Staff recommends that the Council:
CONSIDER SEVERAL METHODS OF MITIGATING IMPACTION AS FOLLOWS:
A. DOUBLE SESSIONS;
B. YEAR -AROUND SCHOOLS;
C. MODIFY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES;
D. USE FACILITIES WHICH HAVE BEEN CLOSED; AND
E. SECURE LE ROY GREEN EMERGENCY BUILDING FUNDS.
SA:lo
Encs. The Board hearing
Map
Ordinance 54
(CC96/33)
ORDINANCE NO. a4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RELAT-
ING TO SCHOOL FACILTIES FEE AND DEDICA-
TIONS. .
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has entered into an agreement with
the Colton Joint Unified School District for the City to provide furnished
school classrooms and related facilities herein sometimes referred to as
"school facilities" or "classroom facilities" or "school class facilities" or
"facilities" or "classroom related facilities;" and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Colton Joint Unified School District
have determined the need to establish school facility fees and dedications and
to implement the provisions of Government Code Section 65970 et seq.;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Citation - This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited
as the "School Facilities Dedication and Fee Ordinance."
SECTION 2. Authority - This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the pro-
visions of Chapter 4.7 com-nencing with Section 65970) of Division 1 of Title
7 of the Government Code.
SECTION 3. Purpose - The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide a
method for financing interim school facilities necessitated by new residential
developments causing conditions of overcrowding.
SECTION 4. Regulations - The City Council may, from time to time, by
resolution, issue regulations to provide for the administration and imple-
mentation of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Findings - The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
finds and declares as follows:
(a) Adequate school facilities should be available for
all children residing in the City, including children
residing in new residential developments.
(b) Public and private residential developments may
require the expansion of existing public schools or
the construction of new school facilities.
(c) In many areas of the City, the funds for the construc-
tion of new classroom facilities are not available
when new development occurs, resulting in the over-
crowding of existing schools
(d) New housing developments frequently cause conditions
of overcrowding in existing school facilities which
cannot be alleviated in a reasonable period of time
without City involvement as provided for under
existing State law.
(e) That, for the above reason, new and improved
methods of financing for interim school
facilities necessitated by new development are
needed in the City of Grand Terrace.
SECTION 6. General Plan - The City of Grand Terrace General Plan pro-
vides for the location of public schools. Interim school facilities, whether
temporary or permanent, to be constructed from fees paid or land required to
be dedicated hereunder, or both, shall be consistent with the City General
Plan.
SECTION 7. Definitions
(a) "Conditions of Overcrowding" - shall mean that the
total enrollment of a school, including enrollment
from proposed development, exceeds the capacity of
such school as determined by the governing body of the
school district.
(b) "Decision -Making Body" - shall mean the Grand Terrace
City Council or their designee.
(c) "Dwelling Unit" - shall mean a building or a portion
thereof, or a mobile home, designed for residential
occupation by one person or a group of two or more
persons living together as a domestic unit.
(d) "Reasonable Methods for Mitigating Conditions of Over-
crowding" - shall include, but are not limited to,
agreements between a subdivider or other developer of
a residential development and the affected school
district whereby temporary -use buildings will be
leased to or for the benefit of the school district or
temporary -use buildings owned by the school district
will be used.
(e) "Residential Development" - shall mean a project
containing residential dwellings, including mobile
homes, of one or more units or a subdivision of land
for the purpose of constructing one or more residen-
tial dwelling units. Residential development
includes, but is not limited to:
(1) A privately proposed amendment to the City
General Plan which would allow an increase in
authorized residential density and where no
further discretionary action for residential
development need be taken by a decision making
body prior to application for a building permit;
(2) A privately proposed specific plan or amendment
to a specific plan which would allow an increase
in authorized residential density;
-2-
11
(3) A tentative or final subdivision map or parcel
map or a time extension on such a tentative map;
(4) A special use permit;
(5) An ordinance rezoning property to a residential
use or to a more intense residential use;
(6) A building permit; or
(7) Any other discretionary permit for residential
use.
(f) "Exemptions" - A residential development shall be
exempt from the requirements of this Division when it
consists of any of the following:
(1) Any modification or remodel of an existing
legally established dwelling unit where no
additional dwelling units are created.
(2) A condominium project converting an existing
apartment building into a condominium where no
new dwelling units are created.
(3) Any rebuilding of'a legally established dwelling
unit destroyed or daimaoed by fire, flood,
explosion, act of God or other accident or catas-
trophe.
(4) Any rebuilding of an historical building recog-
nized, acknowledged and designated as such by the
City.
SECTION 8. Finding of Overcrowded Attendance Area - If the governing
body of a school district which has jurisdiction within the corporated
boundaries of the City of Grand Terrace makes a finding supported by clear and
convincing evidence that:
(a) Conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more
attendance areas that include territory within the
City which will impair the -normal functioning of
educational programs, including the reasons for the
existence of such conditions; and
(b) That all reasonable methods, within established school
district policies, of mitigating conditions of over-
crowding have been evaluated and no feasible method, as
determined by the school district, for reducing such
conditions exist, the governing body of the school
district shall notify the City Council. The notice of
finding sent to the City shall specify the mitigation
measures considered by the school district. If the
City Council concurs in such findings, the provisions
of Section 10 herein shall be applicable to
-3-
official actions taken on residential development
application by a decision making body.
SECTION 9. Notice of Findings Requirements - Any notice of findings
sent by a school district to the City shall specify:
(a) The findings listed in Section 8 herein;
(b) The mitigation measures and methods, including those
listed in the definitions herein under "Reasonable
Methods for Mitigating Conditions of Overcrowding,"
considered by the school district and any determina-
tion made concerning them by the District. Other
mitigation measures may include, but are not limited
to:
(1) Any other agreements entered into by the affected
school district which would alleviate conditions
of overcrowding caused by new residential devel-
opment.
(2) The use of relocatable structures, student trans-
portation and/or school boundary realignment.
(3) The use of available bond or State loan revenues,
to the extent auth-orized by law.
(4) The use of funds which could be available from
the sale of surplus school district real property
and funds available from other appropriate
sources, as determined by the respective govern-
ing bodies of the affected school district.
(c) The precise geographic boundaries of the overcrowded
attendance area or areas.
(d) Such other information as may be required by the City
Council regulations.
SECTION 10. Restriction on Approval of Residential Development/City
Council Findings - Within any attendance area of a school district where it
has been determined pursuant to Section 8 herein, that conditions of over-
crowding exist, no decision making body shall approve an application for a
residential development within such area, unless such decision making body
makes one of the following findings:
(a) That action will be taken pursuant to this Division to
provide dedications of land and/or fees to mitigate
the conditions of overcrowding within that attendance
area or
(b) That there are specific overriding fiscal, economic, 1
social, or environmental factors which in the judgment
of the decision making body would benefit the City,
thereby justifying the approval of a residential
-4-
M
a
development otherwise subject to the provisions of
this Ordinance. An agreement between the applicant
for a residential development and the school district
to mitigate conditions of overcrowding within that
attendance area may be considered by a decision making
body as such an overriding factor.
SECTION 11. Requirement of Fees and/or Dedications - For the purpose
of establishing an interim method of providing classroom facilities where
overcrowding conditions exist as determined pursuant to the provisions herein -
above, the City shall require, as a condition to the approval of a residential
development, the dedication of land, the payc,ent of fees in lieu thereof, or a
combination of both as determined by a decision making body during the
hearings or other proceedings on specific residential development applications
falling within its jurisdiction, unless it has been determined by the City
Council that provisions of subsection (b) of Section 10 hereinabove are appli-
cable. Prior to imposition of the fees and/or dedications of land, it shall
be necessary for a decision making body acting on the application, or the City
Council, to make or to have made the following findings:
(a) The City General Plan provides for the location of
public schools.
(b) The land or fees, or both, transferred to a school district shall
be used only for the purpose of providing interim elementary,
junior high or high school classroom and related facilities as
defined by the governing body of the District.
(c) The location and amount of land to be dedicated or the
ar-nount of fees to be paid, or both, shall bear a
reasonable relationship and will be limited to the
needs of the community for interim elementary, junior
high or high school facilities and shall be reasonably
related and limited to the need for schools caused by
the development.
(d) The facilities to be constructed, leased, or rented
from such fees or the land to be dedicated or both is consistent
with the City General Plan.
SECTION 12. Payment of Fees in Smaller Subdivisions - Only the
payment of fees shall be required in subdivisions containing fifty (50)
parcels or less.
SECTION 13. Standard for Land Dedication and Fees - The standards for
the amount of dedicated land or fees to be required shall be established by
the governing board of each school district where a determination has been
made pursuant to the foregoing provisions herein contained that conditions of
overcrowding exist. Such standards and facts supporting them shall be trans-
mitted to the City Council. If the City Council concurs in such findings,
they shall, until revised, be used by decision making bodies in situations
where dedications of land and/or fees are required as a condition to the
approval of a residential development. frothing herein shall prevent the City
Council from establishing and using standards other than those established by
the school district in the event that the City Council is unable to concur in
those transmitted by the district.
-5-
SECTION, 14. Filing application for Res ident i Aevel opment - At the
time of filing an application for approval of a residential development
located within an attendance area where the findings required have been made,
the applicant shall, as part of such filing, indicate whether it prefers to
dedicate land for school facilities, to pay a fee in lieu thereof, or do a
combination of these. If the applicant prefers to dedicate land, it shall
suggest the specific land.
SECTION 15. Notification to School Districts.
(a) Upon receipt of an application for a residential
development within an attendance area where the
findings required herein have been made, the Planning
Director of the City shall notify the affected school
districts thereof. With the exception of applications
for building permits, said notification shall be made
no later than thirty (30) days prior to consideration
of the application by a decision making body.
(b) For the purpose of advising school districts of
proposed residential development which may affect
them, the Planning Director of the City shall notify a
school district of any application not governed by
subsection (a) hereinabove submitted to City for
approval of any residential development within the
jurisdiction of that school district.
SECTION 16. Decision Factors.
(a) Upon receipt of notification required by subsection
(a) and (b) hereinabove, the governing board of the
affected school district shall determine whether to
require dedication of land within the development,
payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of
both. The school district shall then transmit the
determination to the Planning Director of the City for
submission to the appropriate decision making body for
concurrence. If the decision making body concurs in
such determination it may at the time of its consid-
eration of a residential development application,
impose such requirements. In the respective actions
regarding this determination, the school district and
the decision making body shall consider the following
factors:
(1) Whether lands offered for dedication will be
consistent with the City General Plan;
(2) Whether the lands offered for dedication meet the
criteria established within Education Code
Section 39000 et seq.;
(3) The topography, soils, soil stability, drainage,
access, location and general utility of land in
the development available for dedication;
r]
(4) 'hhether the location and amount of lands proposed
to be dedicated or the amount of fees to be paid,
or both, will bear a reasonable relationship and
will be limited to the needs of the community for
interim elementary or high school facilities and
will be reasonably related and limited to the
need for schools caused by the development;
(5) If only a subdivision is proposed, whether it
will contain fifty (50) parcels or less;
Nothing herein shall prevent a decision making body
from imposing requirements other than those trans-
mitted by the school district in the event that a
decision making body is unable to concur in the
district's determination hereunder.
(b) If the School district has entered into an agreement
with the applicant for the residential development to
mitigate conditions of overcrowding within the attend-
ance area covered by the application, the governing
body shall upon receipt of the notification required
herein so advise the Planning Director and transmit a
copy thereof for submission to the appropriate
decision making body for consideration.
SECTION 17. School District Schedule - Following actions by a
decision making body to require the dedication of land or the payment of fees,
or both, the City Planning Director shall notify each school district affected
thereby. The governing body of the school district shall submit a schedule
specifying how it will use the land or fees, or both, to solve the conditions
of overcrowding. The schedule shall include the school sites to be used, the
classroom facilities to be made available, and the times when such facilities
will be available. In the event the governing body of this school district
cannot meet the schedule, it shall submit modification to the City Council and
the reasons for the modifications.
SECTION 18. Land Dedication - When land is to be dedicated, it shall
be offered for dedication to the affected school district in substantially the
same manner as prescribed by the school district. Dedicated land which subse-
quently is determined by the school district to be unsuitable for school
purposes may be sold at the option of the school district. The funds derived
therefrom therefrom must be used in accordance with this Ordinance.
SECTION 19. Fee Payment - If the payment of a fee is required, such.
payment or the prorata amount thereof shall be made to the Planning Director`
of the City at the time a building permit within the residential development
is approved and issued.
SECTION 20. Fees Held in Trust - Fees paid under this Division shall
be held in trust by the City. Such fees shall be transferred within thirty
(30) days of payment to the school district operating schools within the
attendance area from which the fees were collected.
-7-
SECTION 2 1 . P,efund of Paid Fees - If a residential development
approval is vacated or voided, and if the City or the affected school district
still retains the land and/or fees collected therefor, and if the applicant so
requests, the City Council or the governing board of the school district shall
order the land and/or fees returned to the applicant.
SECTION 22. Use of Land and Fees - All land or fees, or both,
collected pursuant to this Division and transferred to a school district shall
be used only by the district for the purpose of providing interim elementary,
junior high, or high school classroom and related facilities, whether tempor-
ary or permanent.
SECTION 23. Fee Fund Records and Reports - Any school district
receiving funds pursuant to this Division shall maintain a separate account
for any fees paid and shall file a report with the City Council on the balance
in the account at the end of the previous fiscal year and the facilities
leased, purchased, or constructed during the previous fiscal year. In
addition, the report shall specify which attendance areas, which include City
territory, will continue to be overcrowded when the Fall term begins, and
where conditions of overcrowding will no longer exist. Such report shall be
filed by August 1 of each year and shall be filed more frequently at the
request of the City Council.
SECTION 24. Termination of Dedication and Fee Requirements - When it
is determined by the City Council that conditions of overcrowding no longer
exist in an attendance area which includes territory of the City, decision
raking bodies shall cease levying any fee or requiring the dedication of any
land for that area pursuant to this Ordinance. Action under this Section
shall not affect the validity of conditions already imposed for levy of fees
and dedications of land and such conditions shall remain binding.
SECTION 25. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted
within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in three (3) public places within
said City.
SECTION 26. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City held on the 24th day of September, 1981, and finally adopted and
ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 8th day of
October 1981.
ATTEST:
1
Xyor of th i ty a t errace
Cites perk of the City of Grand and of the i*„ ' until thereof.
Terrace and of the City Council
thereof.
Approved as to form:
i 1 r�'
L y % Ai
City Attorney !
so
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I, MYRNA LINDAHL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the
City Council of said City at a regular meeting of the City Council
held on the 8th day of October, 1981, and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen Grant, Petta, Nix;
flayor Tillinghast.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Rigley.
i
City C r.k ftheCity of Grand Terrace
and ofity Council thereof.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I, MYRNA LINDAHL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true, and
correct copy of Ordinance No. 54 of said City, and that the same has
not been amended or repealed.
DATED: October 8, 1981.
i
ity k of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
S-ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I, MYRNA LINDAHL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, being
first duly sv:orn, depose and say:
That I, at all times herein mentioned, v:'as and now am the duly
qualified City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, State of
California; that on the 13th day of October , 1981 ,
I caused to be posted in three conspicuous public places, as
required by law -
CP.DIN'ANCE NO. 54 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO SCHOOL FACILITIES FEE P.ND DEDICATIONS.
(1) City Hall
(2) Grand Terrace branch of the Colton Post Office
(3) Grand Terrace Security Pacific National Bank
111YRN LIP;DAHL, City Clerk
City of Grand Terrace
CO! ION JO,. I N11 RED SC►�00
v 1212 vALENCIA DRIVE COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92824 (714, 824-4227
.j
o� May 26, 1983
t.'R J
P'es'�ent Mayor and City Council of the
City of Grand Terrace
Nix 22795 Barton Foad
ce PiE,:.;ent Grand Terrace, CA 92.: 24
Dear Y_avor and Council �'e ors•
Ce•k
The Board of Education of the Colton Joint Unified School
�S �C=•'�a E Co�_EY District, at a F.egular 2, eeting on Tiay 5, took action regarding
anticipated student i�,paction in the rand Terrace Schools.
Our Board of Education requested that the Grand Terrace City
Council i-_plement Ordinance r54 authorizing builder's fees
and/or land dedication.
RS The action taken confo=s to the requirements of Ordinance i 54,
and the necessary ruater_als are enclosed to initiate the
required analysis.
t: = ' ,�RD L J-CC EN
The District lool.s forward to meeting with you and your staff
in preparing the supportive data.
►:, C-'�aLES H JL�: �N
Sincerely,
W,(J I 2 1Y2"
cc . - a i S, cl1„1 Richard L. J bsen,
Superintendent
RLJ:RSR:1 cb
:�C'H Enclosures: (1) Board Action
u ecto tic n n sent .e Seioces (2) - ap of Attendance Area
r: = -_A% , CARRASCO
G �-r Sp=-c,a' Plorects
E CLEVLLAND
ec,31 Pj, W Pe•sonne) Services
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Y LO
RC gu].ir t•teet ing
May 5, 19`3
Action Item
SulijECl: DLCLARATION OF 1%11PAC-1'10'� FOR GRa,�D TLRRACL, TERPLACE l'lHw, A.1D
TERRACE HILLS SCHOOLS
BACi.GROU'�D: During the past Nears, the school enrollment and projection figures
effecting the Grand Terrace area have been carefully monitored.
Projections for 1953/E4 indicate that there will be sufficient class-
room space to house existing pupils. If growth (new housing) were to
occur, the school district would be unable to meet the demand.
The City of Grand Terrace has an ordinance which authorizes the City
Council to ir,-�plement builder's fees when the Governing Board of the Colton
Joint Unified School District males a finding supported by clear and
convincing evidence that:
1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance
areas that include territory within the City which will
impair the normal functioning of educational programs,
including the reasons for the existence of such conditions;
and
2. When all reasonable methods, within established school
district policies, of mitigating conditions of overcrowding
have been evaluated and no feasible method, as determined by
the school district, for reducing such conditions exist, the
go,,erning bodN of the school district shall notify the City
u Concil. The notice of finding sent to the City shall specify
the mitigation measures considered by the school district.
If the City Council concurs in such findings, the provisions
of Section IC)* herein shall be applicable to official actions
tal.en on residential development application by a decision
mal in- body.
In order to request the City Council of Grand Terrace to implement the
ordinance, it is necessary for the Board of Education to specify
the mitigation methods considered to allevaite the impaction.
Possible methods of mitigating impaction are:
1. Double sessions.
2 Year -around schools.
3. F•So%ement of students from one area to another.
4. Securing LeRoy Green emergency building funds.
S. Securing builders' fees.
6. Ut i 1 i z i ng RDA funds. -1 t } ,��- �• �/� —� r
`Ordinance ;S4
7. Do i,a:hing.
S. Mod if schoul attendance boundaries.
9. Ut :1 :.at i on of t>und money .
10. Litlli -it ion of Dlstrict funds.
11. Sell surplus sites.
12. Sell surplus Irope rty.
13. U-se facilities in other districts.
14 . Use i nt er-dist ri ct att endance agreement s.
'r.ECO'L•�ENDATJON: The Board of Education finds that:
1. Conditions of o,,ercrowding exist in Grand Terrace, Terrace
View and Terrace Hills schools .hich will impair the normal
functioning of the educational Program-
2- All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding
have been evaluated.
3. No feasible method for reducing such conditions exist (from
District resources).
4. The Board request The Mayor and City Council of Grand Terrace
to adopt Ordinance -S4 relating to school facilities fee and
dedications.
ACTION: On motion of board mem',�er- ( _� /� anti
the Board finds that: /
1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in Grand Terrace, Terrace
Viek and Terrace Hills schools which will impair the normal
functioning of the educational program.
2. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding
have been evaluated.
3. No feasible method for reducing such conditions exist (from
District resources).
The Board therefore requests the Mayor and City Council of Grand
Terrace to adopt Ordinance #S4 relating to school facilities fee
and dedications.