01/26/1984CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
TERRACE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JANUARY 26, 1984
22731 Grand Terrace Road 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
* Call to Order
* Invocation - Pastor John DuNesme, Azure Hills Seventh Day Adventi t hurch
* Pledge of Allegiance /
* Roll Call
Staff
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Recommendations
1.
Approval of Minutes (1/5/84)
Approve
2.
Approval of Check Register No. CRA012684
Approve
3.
Residential Mortgage Bond Issue, 1984 Series A
4.
Bid Award - Azure Hills Parking Lot/Fire AW04
O��~
Station Access
C^
5.
RFP-Economic Development Consultant (GTRFP84-3)
2 �'
6.
Storm Drain Master Plan Briefina
7.
Budget Transfer - Annual Maint ante for
Barton/Palm Triangle c A/)L_ 'p y / y- � 5
8.
Budget Allocation - Residential Mortgage
`
Revenue Bonds Audit - FY 81-82 & FY 82-83
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1.
Items to Add/Delete
2.
Approval of Minutes (1/5/84)
Approve
3.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
,expected to be routine & non -controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request
an item be removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
A. Approval of Check Register No.012684 I Approve c G —
Council Action
/ 'i �t /4� 4
COUNCIL AGENDA
1/26/84
Page 2 of 2
B. A RESOLUTIONgOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
Staff
Recommendations
Council Action
Adopt
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, ENDORSING THE COURT
G�
REFORM INITIATIVE.
G _�—� G�
C. Approve Budget Allocation of $1,100 from
Approve.,/ /
6/30/84 Balance Forward to Line Item
10-4412-255 for Contractual Services in the
y
Parking Citations Department
D. Approve Transfer of Annual Maintenance for
Approve
Barton/Palm Triangle from CRA to Community
—�c�_l
Services. Line Item 13-4430-245
c�
4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
5. ORAL REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
B. Parks & Recreation Committee
C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
D. Crime Prevention Committee
E. Emergency Operations Committee
F. Police Chief
G. Fire Chief
H. City Engineer
I. City Attorney
J. City Manager
K. City Council
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. General Plan Update
B. Vivienda Bridge
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Preliminary FY 84-85 Budget
B. Tree Removal Program
ADJOURN
THE NEXT REGULAR CRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
V/
WILL HELD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1984, AT 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 2/9/84 MEETING MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BY 12:00 NOON ON 2/1/84.
approval authority, making it impossible to issue tract maps, permits,
etc., as well as losing HCD funding.
Mr. Rigley questioned if all elements were circulated to the State for
review. Mr. Secord advised the General Plan document went through the
A-95 review process, was distributed to all State, and in some cases,
Federal, County and other adjoining local jurisdictions for review,
with no comments received other than the Housing Element. No comments
were received from any other State agencies; indicated there are a
series of letters from various agencies indicating they have reviewed
and concur with the findings in the report, which will be included in
the final report.
Chairman Grant opened Public Hearing on the General Plan Update, which
also includes the Draft EIR.
Steve Ferris, 6576 Carnegie Avenue, Anaheim, requested that the area
presently designated as a flood plain on the Land Use Map be changed
from A-1 to M-R.
There being no further testimony, Chairman Grant closed Public
Hearing.
Recess was called at 7:54 p.m. and reconvened at 8:15 p.m., with all
Council/CRA members present and Planning Commissioners McDowell,
Caouette, Munson, and DeBenedet present; Planning Commissioner Andress
left the meeting at 7:54 p.m. Recess was again called at 8:16 p.m.
and reconvened at 8:20 p.m., with all Council/CRA members present and
Planning Commissioners McDowell, Caouette, Munson, DeBenedet and
Hawkinson present. Commissioner Hawkinson arrived at 8:20 p.m.
CRA-84-02 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Chairman Grant, ALL AYES, to refer a
proposed change in the Land Use Policy Map of the General Plan to the
Planning Commission to consider changing the designation of the flood
plain area in the northwest corner of the map to light industrial.
Attorney Nazarek advised the Planning Commission is to now consider a
proposed change in the General Plan, as previously approved, to modify
the Land Use Policy Map by changing the designation of the flood plain
area in the northwest corner of the map to light industrial; stated
the Housing Element will not be considered until a later date.
PCM-84-02 Motion by Commissioner Caouette, Second by Commissioner Hawkinson, to
change the area in the northwesterly portion of the Land Use Policy
Map, currently designated as "flood plain" to "light industrial."
Following clarification that the zoning in that area will be M-R,
Motion No. PCM-84-02 carried, ALL AYES, by all present.
Mrs. Pfennighausen questioned if the expanded circulation element is
to become part of the circulation element within the General Plan.
John Starner, Vice -President, CG Engineering, recommended not
including in the General Plan a specific secondary freeway access at
this time; stated it is included in the Master Environmental
Assessment; recommended proceeding with approval of the General Plan
with no indication of the freeway access, then proceed with adoption
Page 5 -
CRA - 1/5/84
of the Feasibility Study; indicated specific recommendations for this
matter have been made by Mr. Secord, since information has been
included in the MEA; stated he understands information will be added
to the General Plan in the future when the feasibility study has been
accepted and a specific alternative has been selected. Confirmed that
voting to approve the General Plan Update at this time is not a vote
to proceed with any items in the expanded circulation element.
Commissioner Cole arrived at 8:35 p.m.
CRA-84-03 Motion by Mr. Rigley, Second by Chairman Grant, to certify the EIR of
the General Plan Update, as modified, and approving the General Plan
Update Program, as modified, to change the area on the Land Use Policy
Map designated "open space" to "light industrial," with the exclusion
of the Housing Element, with the understanding that an appropriate
resolution reflecting this action will be on the Consent Calendar at
the next meeting.
Mrs. Pfennighausen questioned the advantage of approving the General
Plan at this time prior to approval of the Housing Element, and the
method used to advertise the Public Hearing. Mr. Secord indicated
this will prevent any further delay of decisions relative to the Land
Use Policy Map and the other elements; the Public Hearing was posted
in the three locations, as legally required, and was also advertised
in The Sun; Mr. Nix noted that developers, due to the costs involved,
have previously requested an early decision relative to the Land Use
Policy Map to prevent further delays on proposed developments; this
action will accomplish that.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, stated Item c. on page 26 of the
Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report indicates a specific plan
is to be prepared for Area B; questioned if this has been prepared so
the land use can be addressed. Mr. Secord stated the plan provides
for a specific plan for any commercial development of ten acres or
more; felt any major development would meet that acreage requirement;
thus feels the General Plan provides for a specific plan for any major
development which would occur in Area B or anywhere in the City.
Following discussion, and confirmation by Attorney Nazarek that
Mr. Petta would have no conflict of interest in voting on this matter,
Motion No. CRA-84-03 carried, ALL AYES.
Chairman Grant felt further discussion is needed relative to the green
belt issue; feels these are needed in a variety of locations in the
community to separate the commercial areas from the non-commercial
areas.
REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
The Treasurer reviewed the Staff Report on this matter; recommended
that the Agency take action to attract development which will increase
Page 6 -
CRA - 1/5/84
sales and use tax revenue, as recommended in the Redevelopment
Implementation Strategy Report; indicated the five-year capital
improvement budget, soon to be presented to the Agency, will include a
recommendation to set aside $500,000 to assist in pursuing economic
development activities; recommended action be taken while the three
consulting firms are still available to integrate the General Plan
Update Program, the Feasibility Study Improved Freeway Access, and the
Redevelopment Implementation Strategy.
Gary Werner, Vice -President, MSI, stated the Redevelopment
Implementation Strategy Report reviewed the existing opportunities in
the City and assessed the City's financial resource capabilities to
determine if resources are available to pursue economic development
activities; the analysis indicates that one of the most significant
resources available to the City and the Agency is in Area B, which
consists of approximately 115 acres, and located in the vicinity of
the freeway and Barton Road, designated for general commercial usage
in the Land Use Policy Map; the Report recommends encouraging and
facilitating development of that area consistent with the General
Plan; feels this area is the best opportunity for the City to optimize
sales tax revenues; stated development of this area will take time,
will require advance planning, and will require proactive measures by
the City, as outlined on pages 25-28 in the Report.
Mrs. Pfennighausen questioned if there is a deadline for the
termination of the consulting services; was not aware of a deadline.
Gary Werner indicated he felt his firm's contractual obligation
terminated when the Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report was
approved and accepted by the City/Agency; Paul Secord,
Beland/Associates, Inc., indicated his firm's contractual obligation
will be concluded when the final General Plan Update Program, as
amended, is presented and approved, and the necessary copies are
printed. John Starner, CG Engineering, indicated his firm's
contractual obligation will be concluded when and if action is taken
on the recommendations submitted for consideration at this meeting
relative to the Feasibility Study Improved Freeway Access. Ray Bragg,
President, MSI, stated although MSI's contractual obligation was
completed two meetings ago when the Redevelopment Implementation
Strategy Report was accepted, hopes his firm's relationship with the
City will extend for a considerable length of time; would like to see
the City pursue the strategies presented in the Report; due to concern
for the City, his firm will continue to be available as long as needed
by the C i ty .
Mrs. Pfennighausen stated she has never been opposed to commercial
development; has previously been opposed to the approach; recommended
following MSI's recommendations of multiple usage in Area B.
short-term development on Barton Road to provide revenue to develop
Area B, and involving the Chamber of Commerce, since they have
indicated a desire to assist the City with commercial development;
felt funds are not presently available to assemble property.
Page 1 -
CRA - 1/5/84
Mr. Nix questioned only recommending action to implement Objective
I-1, feeling implementation of Objectives I-1 and I-2 is needed;
recommended having the Chamber work with the City in an active role to
develop a plan for implementing I-1 and I-2, which would allow
consideration of alternatives, the amount of land needed for possible
development, and a green -belt buffering area; felt action was
previously taken to form a joint City/Chamber committee for this
purpose; concurs with the need to become aggressive in marketing the
area.
Mr. Rigley stated if funds are to be set aside for economic
development, as recommended by Staff, funds will not be available for
air conditioning the schools and storm drains; felt professional
assistance is needed to attract commercial development.
Mr. Nix noted that although City funds are restricted at this time,
there are alternative financial opportunities available; requested
that Mr. Werner address this matter. Mr. Werner stated he understands
there are financial mechanisms available such as a bond whereby the
Agency, upon consummation of a development agreement on a particular
piece of property, can pledge projected tax increment to a financial
instrument; an industrial development bond is an instrument whereby an
investor pledges the repayment of the bond as being issued for that
development; indicated that when the City's bond issue was instituted
three years ago, the Agencies were required to pledge a more
substantial deposit towards the payback than may now be required;
stated the section of the Health & Safety Code which requires setting
aside 20% of the tax increment for low and moderate income housing
also provides that when the need for this housing is less than the
amount of funds accruing, the Agency can be relieved from a portion of
that requirement; stated the Strategy Report also refers to additional
funds available to the Agency.
Planning Commission Chairman Collins arrived at 9:10. Commissioner
McDowell left the meeting at 9:27 p.m.
Mr. Werner stated the Strategy Report indicates plans and activities
should be undertaken immediately to consummate future development when
presently -pledged tax increment becomes available for new bond issues;
indicated there may be some Chamber residents who have a close
association with influential corporations; recommended taking
advantage of all options and resources available to attract
development to the community.
Chairman Grant stated he felt a shopping mall would have been good for
the community, but concurs with considering more immediate projects to
bring in needed revenue; is not enthusiastic about warehouses and
storage facilities for that area; indicated the Agency has made a
promise relative to school air conditioning which must be kept.
Commissioner Hawkinson stated he feels the major issue to be
considered for development of Area B is freeway accessibility;
Page 8 -
CRA - 1/5/84
F]
(4) With regard to Caltrans and SANBAG and the processes for approval
and for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), that the
City proceed with the processes with Caltrans and SANBAG for inclusion
of a proposed project in the STIP.
Mr. Starner advised the City should adopt an alternative they are
willing to support then proceed with the specific processes for the
formal presentation and review by Caltrans. The Caltrans process
would include the review and approval by their Sacramento headquarters
office. The process for the approval through Caltrans is lengthy so
adequate lead time should be considered for this process. Stated Mr.
Wes McDaniel, SANBAG Director, indicated the City has two options; if
a developer should come in with a large development proposal that
could support and finance a freeway interchange, this report would
still need to be filed with Caltrans; if this does not occur, for
purposes of long-term development, the City should consider the
possibility of getting State funding by submitting the program to
Caltrans and SANBAG to obtain a ranking in the overall STIP.
PCM-84-03 Motion by Commissioner Cole, Second by Chairman Collins, ALL AYES, to
recommend Council/CRA approval of the four recommendations as outlined
by John Starner, CG Engineering.
CRA-84-05 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mrs. Pfennighausen, to approve and adopt
the four recommendations as outlined by Mr. Starner, CG Engineering.
Following confirmation by Attorney Nazarek that Mr. Petta would have
no conflict of interest in this matter, Motion No. CRA-84-05 carried,
ALL AYES.
Alternate Selection - Freeway Access - Mrs. Pfennighausen disagreed
with the Staff recommendation to select Alternate II, indicating it
would be detrimental to the merchants and potential developers on
Barton Road, would involve an overpass in the area where a Girl Scout
facility has recently been built, and would mean two off -ramps within
a quarter mile of each other; favored Alternate I, which would also
benefit Highgrove. The Planning Commission indicated the majority of
the Planning Commissioners also favored Alternate I, and felt the
split diamond to be the least desirable.
Mr. Starner stated the split diamond is favorable from an engineering
standpoint, since the distribution of traffic into the other local
streets would be better served. Was questioned and responded that
both alternatives would cost approximately $5 Million Dollars, not
including right-of-way acquisition. Mr. Nix, with Chairman Grant
concurring, indicated a preference for the Iowa Alternative, noting
they would consider exercising eminent domain with the utility
companies, but not with residents.
CRA-84-06 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by
I -Iowa Avenue Remodel, as the
the State for consideration,
Page 11 -
CRA - 1/5/84
Mrs. Pfennighausen, to approve Alternate
freeway access plan to be submitted to
carried 4-0, with Mr. Petta abstaining.
WATER MAIN DAMAGE
Mrs. Pfennighausen advised that shortly after a 3.5 or 3.7 earthquake
occurred this past weekend, sixteen breaks occurred in the water main
system in the City; on Vivienda, south of Van Buren, two water breaks
occurred within sixty feet of each other which ran for almost five
days because the water company lacks personnel and equipment to handle
such occurrences; these were patched and broke again within a few
hours; another break occurred on Vivienda near the others, one on
Barton Road, and two on Michigan between Barton Road and DeBerry.
Stated that discussions with water company employees revealed that no
additional help is hired for such emergencies; there were only three
employees working long hours doing the repair work with poor and
improper equipment. Recommended that the City put the water company
on notice to acquire the necessary equipment and to hire additional
employees, when needed, to maintain the water system and to make
repairs in a timely manner; noted the water fees continue to
increase. Chairman Collins noted the water company proxies will be
mailed out in a month.
ADJOURN - The Joint Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council/CRA
and Planning Commission adjourned at 10:48 p.m. The next regular
Planning Commission Meeting will be held February 6, 1984 and the next
Council/CRA Meetings will be held January 12, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
u -
L,,
APPROVED:
Chairman
Page 12 -
CRA - 1/5/84
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
JAN. 26, 1984
CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA012684
CHECK
NO. • OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF JAN. 26, 1984
(1)
P1334
HUGH GRANT
AGENCY DIRECTORS'FRINGE
1/84
$ 150.00
(2)
P1335
JAMES RIGLEY
AGENCY DIRECTORS'FRINGE
1/84
150.00
(3)
P1336
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
MEDICAL INS./PETTA, DEF.
COMP./NIX 1/84
200.00
(4)
P1337
ROY NIX
AGENCY DIRECTORS'FRINGE
1/84
100.00
5)
P1338
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
AGENCY DIRECTORS'FRINGE
1/84
150.00
(6)
P1339
BELAND AND ASSOCIATES,INC.
PUBLIC HEARINGS,PARTIAL
COMPLETE,FINAL
PUBLICATION,PARTIAL COMPLETE
GENERAL PLAN
2,300.00
(7)
P1340
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES
FIRE STATION/AZURE HILLS
1,373.00
MASTER PLAN STORM DRAINS
1,086.00
PICO STORM DRAIN
8,592.88
ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION
110.00
TOTAL KICAK
$T1,TZ1:$$
(8)
P1341
STEVE PANDZA CONSTRUCTORS
CHANGE ORDER 41, ADDITIONAL
WORK ON STEPS
AND STAMP-CRETE AT PARK
950.00
(9)
P1342
POSTAL INSTANT PRESS
PRINT COVER FOR PROPOSED
G.T. REDEVELOPMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
14.31
(10)
P1343
WEISER,KANE,BALLMER, & BERKMAN
PUBLICATION ` COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW"
13
1984 EDITION
65.00
TOTAL:
$15,241.19
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN
AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA.
a4�EDWARD R. CLARK
TREASURER
` w
STQ�FF REPC)i�T
12.242
C R A ITEM ( X) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) hE ETING DATE: January 26, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Azure Hills Parking Lot Access to the Fire Station
FUNDING REQUIRED Yes, see attached Memo, dated Jan. 11, 1984
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
On January 10, 1984, the City received bids for the above project. At your meeting of
January 12, I briefly advised the City Council of the results of the bids. Since that
time, we have analyzed the bids, apportioned the costs in accordance with the Agreement
with the City of Grand Terrace and Azure Hills Church and submitted to Mr. Gil Bader
the necessary information to present to his Board of Directors for consideration the
award of the Contract.
Based on the bids received, the costs of the project were considerably higher than the
estimate. The Agreement between the City and the Church provides for the costs to the
Church NOT TO EXCEED ten percent (10%) of the estimate. Since the costs, based on the
three lowest responsible bidders all exceeded the ten percent specified in the Agreement,
we felt that it was necessary to submit to the Board of Directors of the Church the
cost breakdown and their new pro-rata share of the total contract costs. This matter
was considered by the Board of Directors of the Azure Hills Church at their meeting of
January 17, 1984, and I am advised by Mr. Gil Bader that the Board has agreed to proceed
with the project, even with the increased costs.
Attached for your information are the following:
1) Exhibit "B" of the Original Agreement showing Cost Breakdown & Allocation, based on the
Engineer's estimate with the costs of the lowest responsible bidder inserted above
the typed figure. The purpose of this is for comparison between the estimate and
the Contract unit prices as submitted by the lowest responsible bidder.
2) Distribution of these costs for the three lowest responsible bidders, based on the
formula agreed upon by the City and the Church.
3) Exhibit "B", Revised - Based on Proposal of Lowest Bidder Jan. 12, 1984, including
the summary of total estimated costs to each participant.
4) January 11, 1984 memo re: Funding sources.
Staff recommends:
1) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND
AZURE HILLS SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:
Azure Hills Parking Lot Access to the Fire Station Staff Report
January 26, 1984 -2-
a) PARAGRAPH 4 SHALL READ: "CITY AGREES THAT THE COSTS OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS
SHALL NOT EXCEED THE COSTS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" AND THE SUMMARY SHEET
ATTACHED THERETO."
b) THAT IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE AGREEMENT, THE REFERENCE "EXHIBIT B" BE REPLACED
WITH THE REFERENCE TO"EXHIBIT B, REVISED - BASED ON PROPOSAL OF LOWEST
BIDDER, 1/12/84."
2) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AWARD THE CONTRACT TO MATICH CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$74,950.00 AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID CONTRACT.
JK/lbk
Attachments
12
M
F.
incorporated herein completed within one year from the
date of this agreement.
3. Church's Share of Construction Costs. Church agrees
to reimburse City for the Church's share of the total
cost of said improvements as shown on Exhibit "B" within
thirty (30) days after receipt of an itemized statement as
presented by the contractor constructing and installing
said improvements, to Church from City.
4. Cost Over Estimate. City agrees that the cost of said
improvements shall not exceed by more than ten (10%) the
estimated cost of said improvements as shown on Exhibit "B".
5. Construction Easement. Church agrees to and does hereby
grant a temporary construction easement to City of the
property described on Exhibit "C", attached hereto and
incorporated herein, for the purpose of construction of
said parking lot improvements. This construction ease-
ment shall expire and terminate thirty (30) days after
City's filing of a "Notice of Completion" on said parking
lot improvement project.
6. Construction by Church. Both parties hereto agree that
those portions of the parking lot improvement projects as
shown on Exhibit "D", attached hereto and incorporated
herein, are to be undertaken and completed by Church within
one hundred eighty (180) days of the execution of this
Agreement. City agrees that the estimated costs as shown
on Exhibit "D" for those portions of work done and com-
pleted by Church shall be allocated to Church's pro rata
-2-
12,242
EXHIBIT "B"
Azure Hills Church Parking Lot
- Cost
Breakdown & Allocation
Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Item Price
Church
City
No.
1.
Conc. block retaining
S.F.
925
-+.e9'
,31:099.ee
}r7eove0
wall--w'ly side of
parking lot
g7r
Sy9�,25
S 990,25
Conc. block ret. wall
S.F.
615
4.ee
�r469
ZT46{�:90
along bldg.
7. 2c
6PQ,oa
G64. °J
3.
Conc. curb only 8"
L.F.
95
-7:36-
-. v
7+2:-58'
along e'ly s/parking
lot
7,S 'V
4("5.00
4(15.00
4.
Conc. curb & gutter
L.F.
62
-8.88
-496.0 -
149". 0
6" per SLd. 116
7,2•
611 .2o
S /I.20
5.
Conc. curb only
L.F.
71
7490-
494-.-69'
494-r90
6" parking lot
122o•oo
220•00
6.
Collar around S.D.
Ea.38rtG0
connection
49oo.ou
4 900.0.
lL4c�.00
7.
Catch basin - Std.
Ea.
1
35re@:9@-
�; 9(3:6U
1r54�3„69
Plan No. D-72
G40,00
G 44o, a
C140.00
8.
Modify & reinforce
Ea.
1
-699.e9
-&8(W00--
5w:-w
_Qxist. catch basin
21 . 0 -
if .00
2 474, o �
9. {,
,8', Dia. VCP (Sched.40)
L.F.
116
2440&
2,784�90
parking lot
10,
8" Dia. VCP (Sched.40)
L.F.
55
-16-04-
-889.00-
88e.,w
Parking lot
?540
27�j,4o
77q,%(a
11,
AC paving, Street
Ton
11
36T66
38§r89-
385:�3�
Barton Rd. in front
D/i+
1_2.242
Azure Hills Church Parking Lot Cost Breakdown 8 Allocation
Itcm
Description
Unlit
Quantity
Unit Price
Item Price
Church
City
No.
4.
07-r
12.
Cl. 2 Base material
Ton
27
-levee-
240r68
248:00
@ D/W on Barton Rd.
(440 S.F.)
3.
AC paving -parking
Ton
340
3&rAe
4 3E)6:@6
]h,990-.M
lot, excl. truck ln.
14.
C1 2 base, parking
Ton
990
10.99
4T999:90-
9,900.00
lot excl. truck ln.
0.0
? L 40. a"
2 079. To
r 5 60.16
15.
AC removal parking
S.F.
28,000
-8z•1Le-
57609r99 -
3;289:90-
49G-.,W
lot, in cl. truck ln.
2. na
9%oo.00
22S.
675. or,
16.
Conc. drive approach
S.F.
450
_Iveo 25/75
•45A:99—
i+2-r5e
3e7--5e-
from Barton Rd.
remove
17.
Conc. drive approach
S.F.
500
,2� 25/75
1,031.25
from Barton Rd. replace
_ 8.
AC paving - parking
Ton
221
3b:00-
7r446.00r
47435T-09
lot, truck lane
G•55
4y r gS
3 451.95
19.
Cl 2 base material truck
Ton
527
-10V99"
5T�$s6A
5•�-�4.68- �''
lane parking lot
0,40
28.rf : ?o
� �.T.�: 2a
20.
Guard rail @ bldg.
L.F.
332
4T494-rW
47494.-W
and easement
Soo - Do
✓
✓
21.
Relocate light
Ea.
1
509:oi�
500.00
500.00
14,00
:o0
57 o00g
22.
Wheel stops
Ea.
36
8 eel
72
12.242
Azure Hills Church Parking Lot - Cost Breakdown & Allocation
item
No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Item Price
Church
City
'
vs.00
2/S, o•
211.0 •
23.
Adjust sewer
Ea.
250.00
250700--
clean out
A?0.00
37o•0o
32o.ae
24.
Relocate fence
L.S.
L.S.
:. ,�D4r80r
599rAApU
�•'�0
��•��
/t�.o.a
25.
Install 1}"
L.F.
110
4r0T
-440.0
44&.eO-
•�
waterline
Q.90
V7,o•
SM OO
26.
Install 2" elect.
L.F.
110
440.88•
449:99'
conduit
e
dGo.eo
8�0,0o
d3o•oo
�'�d.00
27.
Remove stumps
L.S.
L.S.
508~:00
599:@0
vise.
250.00
12/$301bo
/2 53a. (.a
10, 651% 01
i879• 51 .
28.
Earthwork
C.Y.
L.S,
Le: 85/15
d-5@9:0C
-wee-
-3?5.
29.
Striping
L.S.
L.S.
200. 0 0
20m, a 0
489e:G9-
Z oo • ►.s
600,00-
$43, 654,5
,
74 QSD. -
53,117, SL $
21 23Z.4 -
K
h
w
u
eFw—fmou
C h urrh � Pcfrlhi�5 Lo� �,ccess
7 2 3 _4
A AmalicA I)cjrtA 1
- ia M
7
.740
VA
7 6�oi
C-C
14
-ce "C pr
�1.1,2c
4
1
j
cr
cAr-
AC k Lavc___& 114C%JA
&!6_
44+
AV
41;d
4_1
l e
--cncAZ
fq
1-;1
1 of_
�
oa-
7
AC_AV,f7j to If-C fir
al J
T:,
75,
2.r
cx�� if.�Van rot.,
r1r
sk
s
.5 Irpy4r r G0.
J'4 K
Z, 0
J.'
00;
T
/I
53;0; 6*
7`9
'74
1-74L
t f
-75'
1/12/84
EXHIBIT "B"
12.242
Revised - Based
on Proposal of
Lowest Bidder
Azure
Hills Church Parking
Lot - Cost
breakdown &
allocation
Item
Unit
Item
No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Price
Price
Church
City
1.
Conc. block retaining
S.F.
925
9.75
9,018.75
9,018.75
wall--w'ly side of
parking lot
.
Conc. block ret. wall
S.F.
615
9.75
5,996.25
5,996.25
along bldg.
3.
Conc. curb only 8"
L.F.
95
7.20
684.00
684.00
along e'ly s/parking
lot
4.
Conc. curb & gutter
L.F.
62
7.50
465.00
465.00
6" per Std. 116
5.
Conc. curb only
L.F.
71
7.20
511.20
511.20
6" parking lot
6.
Collar around S.D.
Ea.
2
110.00
220.00
220.00
Connection
7.
Catch basin - Std.
Ea.
1
4,900.00
4,900.00
4,900.00
Plan No. D-72
8.
Modify & reinforce
Ea.
1
640.00
640.00
640.00
exist. catch basin
9.
12" Dia. VCP (Sch.
L.F.
116
21.00
2,436.00
2,436.00
40) parking lot
10.
8" Dia. VCP (Sch.
L.F.
55
21.00
1,155.00
1,155.00
40) Parking lot
11.
AC paving, street
Ton
11
25.40
279.40
279.40
Barton Rd in front
driveway
1/12/84
12.242
Azure
Hills Church Parking
Lot - Cost
Breakdown & allocation
Item
Unit
Item
No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Price
Price
Church
City
12.
Cl. 2 Base Material
Ton
27
6.55
176.85
176.85
@ D/W on Barton Rd.
(440 S.F.)
13.
AC paving -parking
Ton
340
25.40
8,636.00
8,636.00
lot, excl. truck
In.
14.
Cl. 2 base, parking
Ton
990
6.55
6,484.50
6,484.50
lot excl. truck In.
15.
AC removal parking
S.F.
28,000
0.13
57.14/
3,640.00
2,079.90
1,560.1u
lot, incl. truck
42.86
In.
16.
Conc. drive appr.
S.F.
450
2.00
25/75
900.00
225.00
675.00
from Barton Rd.
remove
17.
Conc. drive appr.
S.F.
500
2.15
25/75
1,075.00
268.75
806.25
from Barton Rd.
replace
18.
AC paving - parking
Ton
221
25.40
5,613.40
5,613.40
lot, truck lane
19.
Cl. 2 base mat.
Ton
527
6.55
3,451.85
3,451.85
truck In. parking
lot
20.
Guard rail @
L.F.
332
8.60
2,855.20
2,855.20
Bldg. & easement
21.
Relocate light
Ea.
1
500.00
500.00
500.00
22.
Wheel stops
Ea.
36
14.00
504.00
504.00
1/12/84
12.242
Azure Hills Church Parking Lot - Cost Breakdown & allocation
Item
Unit
Item
No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Price
Price
Church
City
23.
Adjust sewer clean
Ea.
1
215.00
215.00
215.00
out
24.
Relocate fence
L.S.
L.S.
320.00
320.00
320.00
41 5.
Install 11"
L.F:
110
1.50
165.00
165.00
Waterline
26.
Install 2"
L.F.
110
4.70
517.00
517.00
Elec. conduit
27.
Remove stumps
L.S.
L.S.
860.00
50/50 860.00
430.00
430.00
28.
Earthwork
C.Y.
L.S.
12,530.60
85/ 12,530.60
10,651.01
1,879.59
15
29. Striping L.S. L.$. 200.00 200.00 200.00
74,950.00 53,717.56 21,232.44
J
Construction Costs
Engineering Costs
Total Costs
Contingencies
TOTAL COSTS, Est.
City Share
Church Share
Azure Hills Parking Lot 1/12/84
SUMMARY OF COSTS Church City
53,717.56 21,232.44
4,525.00
53,717.56 25,757.44
5,371.76 2,575.74
$ 59,089.22 $ 28,333.18
32.4%
67.6$
STd�FF REPO*RT-
C R A ITEM (XX) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: JANUARY 26, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT STAFF EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (GTRFP 84-3)
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
The Agency on January 5, 1984 approved the staff going out for subject proposals.
The staff proposes to solicit proposals with the attached letter.
Staff Recommends the Agency:
APPROVE THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SOLICITING PROPOSALS WITH THE
ATTACHED LETTER.
ERC:gr
6
January 20, 1984
Gentlemen:
Re: GTRFP #84-03
We invite you to submit a proposal to act as the staff extension for the
Executive Director/City Manager for carrying out the Redevelopment
Strategy and Planning as visualized in the attached document.
The services required would include establishing a strategy and a
development plan maintaining a presence in developer forums, retail trade
meetings and other areas affording an opportunity to sell Grand Terrace as
a viable commercial market location. The firm selected for the foregoing
must have the proven ability to plan and carry out development
solicitations and developer negotiations. The objective to come from these
services (strategy and planning) must be to see that the short and long
term Commercial/Residential Industrial growth and elanning is suc tat the
City will enjoy a greatly increased source of stable revenue.
The Agency/City Council recently approved or completed a General Plan
Update, a freeway access and a Redevelopment Implementation Strategy.
Grand Terrace is a progressive, pure contract city of 10,000 population
encompassing 3.7 square miles. The entire City is approved as a
redevelopment area; therefore, the Agency realizes tax increment from any
new improvements made within the City.
Your proposal should include:
I. Qualifications in redevelopment (a strategy and plan) and means of
financing.
2. Experience in redevelopment planning and financing and key firm
members who will be assigned to this project.
M
January 20, 1984
Page 2
3. Firms expertise and knowledge in redevelopment agency planning and
compliance.
4. Current redevelopment contracts in Southern California.
5. Availability on day-to-day basis for consultation.
6. Types and when reports/plans will be submitted.
7. A schedule of time and costs to accomplish the objective.
8. The cost rate of personnel.
9. Methods of selecting development firms.
10. Any other aspects that you believe are pertinent to the objective.
A meeting will be held with the Executive Director/City Manager and other
members of his staff at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 8, 1984 in
Building No. 4, City Conference Room, to give you the opportunity to
discuss the Agency's/City's operation and ask any questions you may have.
Those firms interested will then submit 12 copies of their proposal to be
received no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 22, 1984. Staff
recommendations will be submitted to the Agency Directors/City Council for
approval on March 8, 1984.
The proposed fee should be a fixed amount and hourly rates for additional
work approved by the Agency.
Sincerely,
Seth Armstead
Executive Director/City Manager
EC:SA:lo
Encl. Redevelopment Implementation Strategy,
Municipal Services, Inc.
(LGTRFP84-03--2)
Jan. S,- 1984—
lEe-mv
t 12-1 6. 7
C R A ITEM (x ) CCUtrCII Is- ( ?
AGENDA ITEM N0.
SUBJECT: Master Plan of Storm Drains
Fi,';DING F- iRED x
�dC FU':DI 1'G RED !'_RED
MZETING DATE: Jan. 26, 1984
Attached for your review prior to their regular meeting of the City Council on January 26,
1984, is a copy of the rough draft Master Plan of Storm Drains for the City of Grand
Terrace.
This report will be presented in summary form indicating the major concerns and the
associated costs at that meeting. The report will be subject of discussion between
the staff, City Council and Public in general (not a public hearing).Subsequently the
report will be amended in accordance with those discussions and presented in its final
form to the City Council. [Should the City Council desire to incorporate the Master
Plan of Storm Drains for the City of Grand Terrace as an element of the General Plan,
scheduled public hearings would be required prior to such adoption
Staff recommends:
INFORMATION ONLY
JK/lbk
C R A ITEM (X ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM NO. '1
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF ACCOUNT
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
Staff requests that the project known as "Annual Maintenance Barton & Palm Triangle",
account number CRA 22-4932-255, be dropped as a CRA project. Since this is an on-
going maintenance project, it should be transferred'to Community Services Line Item
number 13-4430-245, "Maintenance Building & Grounds". There is currently enough
funds available within this line item to cover the annual costs.
Staff Recommends that the Council and Agency:
APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROJECT FROM CRA #22-4932-255, TO
COMMUNITY SERVICES LINE ITEM # 13-4430-245.
RLA
STVF REPOPJ. YesM(XX)yYNoc(
C R A ITEM (XXi COUNCIL ITEM ( ) FETING DATE: JANUARY 26, 1983
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR AUDIT OF RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
1981/1982 FY AND 1982/1983 FY
The existing contract with Crabtree, Karlen and Arzoo, Certified Public
Accountants, for the Community Redevelopment Agency does not include an
audit of the Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds for 1981/1982 or 1982/1983
Fiscal Years. As this is a requirement, it is requested that $2000 be
allocated for the purpose of contracting Crabtree, Karlen and Arzoo,
Certified Public Accountants to perform these audits in conjunction with the
annual audit of Community.Redevelopment Agency's 1982/1.983 Fiscal Year.
Staff Recommends Agency:
ALLOCATE $2000 TO LINE ITEM 22-4200-250 FOR THE PURPOSE OF AUDITING THE
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE.BONDS FOR FISCAL YEARS 1981/1982 AND 1982/1983.
gr
Ptc4L i,-VG CITY JAN 2 61984
COUNCIL APPROVAL
COUNCIL AGENDA IT_ kM;l Z
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MINUTES
JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 5, 1984
A joint adjourned regular meeting of the City Council, the Community Redevelopment
Agency, and the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace was called to
order at the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on January 5, 1984, at 6:04 p.m.
PRESENT: City Council/Community Redevelopment Agency
Hugh J . Grant, Mayor
Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tony Petta, Councilman
Roy W. Nix, Councilman
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman
Planning Commission
Sanford Collins, Mairman (Arrived at 9:10 p.m.)
John McDowell, Vice -Chairman (Left at 9:27 p.m.
Vern Andress (Left at 7:54 p.m.)
William DeBenedet
Ray Munson
Norman Caouette
Gerald Cole (Arrived at 8:35 p.m.)
Jerry Hawkinson (Arrived at 8:20 p.m.)
Ed Clark, Acting City Manager
Eugene Nazarek, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer/Planning Director
Myrna Erway, City Clerk
ABSENT: Winifred Bartel, Planning Commissioner
Seth Armstead, City Manager
CIVIC CENTER EXTERIOR COLOR
Architect Larry Wolff advised that recent occurrences of efflorescence
at the Fire Station have created a concern relative to using the same
masonry on the Civic Center as was used for the Fire Station, as
recommended in the Staff Report submitted for this meeting; indicated
he would still recommend using the Davidson product in the same colors
as the Fire Station, preferring those colors aesthetically and due to
the substantial price difference. Recommended using "Sunset," with
"Baja Brown" as the accent color masonry if the Atlas product is
selected.
Stated that efflorescence is caused by a chemical reaction between
salts, lime and water in clay, mortar and grout; this sometimes occurs
in all masonry products, including slumpstone and blocks, which can
easily be removed; the contractor for the Fire Station will be
notified in writing to take the necessary steps to clean the masonry,
under the one-year warranty.
Page 1 -
1/5/84
Indicated that neither of the companies would guarantee no
efflorescence; felt that, should this problem occur with the Civic
Center, the problem would be eliminated after several years and no
more than two cleaning applications. Requested a decision at this
time to ensure no delays in the construction of the Civic Center,
indicating the Contractor has already delayed ordering the masonry
material.
Mayor Grant announced that he attended a Regional Meeting of the
American Institute of Architects at which time the firm of Barmakian,
Wolff, Lang, Christopher Architects received two awards for
architectural excellence - one award for the Fire Station as a
completed project, and the other award for the Civic Center as a
future project. The City, as the client, also received an award for
each of the projects. Mayor Grant commended Architect Larry Wolff.
Mayor Grant noted that a summary of an adjourned joint Council/CRA/
Planning Commission Public Workshop Session held December 8, 1983 was
distributed to all members.
Councilman Rigley felt the efflorescence is not a minor issue, felt
the problem was due to the materials used in the masonry, and
questioned using the same material on the Civic Center. Mr. Wolff
indicated there is the possibility this problem would not occur in
another manufacturer's product, since different chemicals are used.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned and received confirmation that
this problem would have no effect on the structural integrity of the
structure. Councilman Nix noted his office building, which is red
brick, had efflorescence, which has not recurred since it was cleaned.
Mr. Wolff stated he felt the reason the Atlas material costs more is
that it probably is a higher quality material; more labor is involved
to install the material; felt that, under the circumstances,
considering everyone's opinion, the Atlas product would probably be a
wise decision. Indicated every precaution was taken to minimize the
occurrence of efflorescence on the Fire Station, including specifying
low -sulphate content and a coating of waterproofing.
Councilman Petta questioned and received confirmation that the lighter
colored Atlas product was included in the Civic Center contract as an
alternative bid item for $118,000, and that it perhaps is a better
quality. In that case, recommended considering this product, feeling
the best quality material available should be used for a $2 1/2
Million Dollar facility to ensure long duration.
Councilman Rigley supported usage of the Atlas product, though more
expensive, due to the problems at the Fire Station and feeling if the
problem occurred, would not be as noticeable on a lighter color; likes
the red brick for the Fire Station, but feels a lighter color for the
Civic Center would be more attractive, and the Atlas product is a
better quality.
Page 2 -
1/5/84
Councilwoman Pfennighausen supported the Davidson product, feeling
the efflorescence would not look any better on either material, dark
red becomes more attractive with age, rain and smog will discolor
light-colored brick, and is more expensive.
Commissioner Munson questioned and received confirmation that the
price quoted for the Atlas product is not negotiable; questioned why
the Atlas product is better than Davidson; Mr. Wolff stated the Atlas
product appears to be more dense, with more material per square inch
used than in the Davidson product, decreasing water absorption; the
Davidson product also chips.
Commissioner DeBenedet supported the Atlas product, feeling it is a
better quality and that the lighter color would look better.
Commissioner McDowell questioned and received confirmation that the
products being considered are the best available; felt the $118,000,
which represents 5% of the total building cost, is not excessive;
indicated there is also efflorescence in the interior of the building;
questioned the possibility that excessive lime was used in the mortar;
Mr. Wolff stated this could not be verified unless core samples were
taken and lab tests conducted. Commissioner Andress questioned the
cost and time to conduct such tests; Mr. Wolff indicated it would cost
several thousand dollars and would take 4-6 weeks.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned if using more mortar would
affect the strength of the building; Mr. Wolff indicated the grout and
steel reinforcement determine the strength of the walls; felt using
more mortar would not affect the strength. Mayor Grant indicated
support for conducting a chemical analysis to determine whether
excessive lime was used in the materials for the Fire Station.
PCM-84-01 Motion by Commissioner DeBenedet, Second by Commissioner Munson, to
use the Atlas Brick Company product, using the colors of "Sunset,"
with "Baja Brown" as the accent color for the Civic Center carried
4-1, with Commissioner Munson voting NOE.
CC-84-01 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilman Petta to use the
Atlas Brick Company product, using the colors of "Sunset," with "Baja
Brown" as the accent color for the Civic Center. Councilman Nix
stated the maintenance cost to remedy the problem of efflorescence,
should it occur on the proposed Civic Center facility, is unknown, and
there is no assurance the problem won't occur; the statement has been
made that the Atlas Brick Company product is probably better quality,
but questioned whether it is worth the additional $118,000; felt 5% of
the total cost is significant; felt he could not support the change
with the limited data presented. Councilman Rigley felt although
there is no assurance there will be no efflorescence if the Atlas
Brick Company product is used, feels it is very likely it will occur
with the Davidson Brick Company product, since it has already
occurred, so would prefer not to use the same product. Councilman
Petta stated although there is no assurance the same problem won't
occur with the Atlas Brick Company product, it is known that
Page 3 -
1/5/84
Ln
maintenance will be required with a darker color product, and it is
likely it would not be as noticeable on a lighter colored brick; felt
the savings realized in additional maintenance costs will take care of
the additional costs expended at this time.
Motion No. CC-84-01 carried 3-2, with Councilman Nix and Councilwoman
Pfennighausen voting NOE.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Paul Secord, Vice -President, Beland/Associates, reviewed the General
Plan Update Program prepared by his firm. Indicated a request has
been made and concurs with changing the designation of the flood plain
portion of the land use map to light industrial; a question was raised
whether specific areas for Gage Canal access should be indicated;
feels this matter should be addressed when specific development plans
for that area are submitted; stated information provided in a
memorandum relative to the Parks & Recreation Element will be
incorporated into the General Plan and the EIR as reflected in the
memorandum. The final recommendation on the freeway access study is
to be included as part of the master EIR; that section can be changed
without going through the formal General Plan Amendment procedure;
when a specific plan is adopted relative to the Freeway Access Study,
it can be added to the General Plan by amendment in two ways - could
either be included in the MAE or it can be added as a separate section
as the Circulation Element in the General Plan.
Stated questions were raised concerning the population estimates
included in the General Plan, which were based on the 1980 census.
Indicated the reason the population estimates listed are lower than
previous estimates given is that the estimating factor for household
size has decreased from 3 persons to 2.59 per household, according to
the most recent demographic information.
Stated a four -page letter was received from the State HCD addressing
questions relative to the Housing Element; based on conversations held
with the HCD Representative who prepared the letter, feels there will
be no problem adding and getting subsequent approval on the requested
information. Council questioned, with Mr. Secord confirming that the
Housing Element would not be approved until that element, as amended,
has been presented for Council review. The Planning Director
questioned whether formal State approval would be required prior to
adoption of the Housing Element; Mr. Secord felt it would be
unnecessary to wait for a formal response from the State, since he
feels preliminary approval can be received; indicated it would take a
long time to receive formal response from the State.
Commissioner McDowell questioned, and Mr. Secord responded he sees no
problem meeting the State allocation for affordable housing. It was
also questioned and confirmed that a senior citizen complex or
apartment building would satisfy this requirement; rehabilitation
programs and loans can also accomplish this; failure to satisfy State
requirements can result in the State freezing the City's development
approval authority, making it impossible to issue tract maps, permits,
etc., as well as losing HCD funding.
Page 4 -
1/5/84
Councilman Rigley questioned if all elements were circulated to the
State for review. Mr. Secord advised the General Plan document went
through the A-95 review process, was distributed to all State, and in
some cases, Federal, County and other adjoining local jurisdictions
for review, with no comments received other than the Housing Element.
No comments were received from any other State agencies; indicated
there are a series of letters from various agencies indicating they
have reviewed and concur with the findings in the report, which will
be included in the final report.
Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing on the General Plan Update, which
also includes the Draft EIR.
Steve Ferris, 6576 Carnegie Avenue, Anaheim, requested that the area
presently designated as a flood plain on the Land Use Map be changed
from A-1 to M-R.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing.
Recess was called at 7:54 p.m. and reconvened at 8:15 p.m., with all
Council/CRA members present and Planning Commissioners McDowell,
Caouette, Munson, and DeBenedet present; Planning Commissioner Andress
left the meeting at 7:54 p.m. Recess was again called at 8:16 p.m.
and reconvened at 8:20 p.m., with aIT Council/CRA members present and
Planning Commissioners McDowell, Caouette, Munson, DeBenedet and
Hawkinson present. Commissioner Hawkinson arrived at 8:20 p.m.
CC-84-02 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to refer a
proposed change in the Land Use Policy Map of the General Plan to the
Planning Commission to consider changing the designation of the flood
plain area in the northwest corner of the map to light industrial.
Attorney Nazarek advised the Planning Commission is to now consider a
proposed change in the General Plan, as previously approved, to modify
the Land Use Policy Map by changing the designation of the flood plain
area in the northwest corner of the map to light industrial; stated
the Housing Element will not be considered until a later date.
PCM-84-02 Motion by Commissioner Caouette, Second by Commissioner Hawkinson, to
change the area in the northwesterly portion of the Land Use Policy
Map, currently designated as "flood plain" to "light industrial."
Following clarification that the zoning in that area will be M-R,
Motion No. PCM-84-02 carried, ALL AYES, by all present.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned if the expanded circulation
element is to become part of the circulation element within the
General Plan. John Starner, Vice -President, CG Engineering,
recommended not including in the General Plan a specific secondary
freeway access at this time; stated it is included in the Master
Environmental Assessment; recommended proceeding with approval of the
General Plan with no indication of the freeway access, then proceed
with adoption of the Feasibility Study; indicated specific
Page 5 -
1/5/84
LM
recommendations for this matter have been made by Mr. Secord, since
information has been included in the MEA; stated he understands
information will be added to the General Plan in the future when the
feasibility study has been accepted and a specific alternative has
been selected. Confirmed that voting to approve the General Plan
Update at this time is not a vote to proceed with any items in the
expanded circulation element.
Commissioner Cole arrived at 8:35 p.m.
CC-84-03 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Mayor Grant, to certify the EIR
of the General Plan Update, as modified, and approving the General
Plan Update Program, as modified, to change the area on the Land Use
Policy Map designated "open space" to "light industrial," with the
exclusion of the Housing Element, with the understanding that an
appropriate resolution reflecting this action will be on the Consent
Calendar at the next meeting.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned the advantage of approving the
General Plan at this time prior to approval of the Housing Element,
and the method used to advertise the Public Hearing. Mr. Secord
indicated this will prevent any further delay of decisions relative to
the Land Use Policy Map and the other elements; the Public Hearing was
posted in the three locations, as legally required, and was also
advertised in The Sun; Councilman Nix noted that developers, due to
the costs involved, have previously requested an early decision
relative to the Land Use Policy Map to prevent further delays on
proposed developments; this action will accomplish that.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, stated Item c. on page 26 of the
Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report indicates a specific plan
is to be prepared for Area B; questioned if this has been prepared so
the land use can be addressed. Mr. Secord stated the plan provides
for a specific plan for any commercial development of ten acres or
more; felt any major development would meet that acreage requirement;
thus feels the General Plan provides for a specific plan for any major
development which would occur in Area B or anywhere in the City.
Following discussion, and confirmation by Attorney Nazarek that
Councilman Petta would have no conflict of interest in voting on this
matter, Motion No. CC-84-03 carried, ALL AYES.
Mayor Grant felt further discussion is needed relative to the green
belt issue; feels these are needed in a variety of locations in the
community to separate the commercial areas from the non-commercial
areas.
REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
The Finance/Administrative Services Officer reviewed the Staff Report
on this matter; recommended that Council take action to attract
development which will increase sales and use tax revenue, as
Page 6 -
1/5/84
n
n
recommended in the Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report;
indicated the five-year capital improvement budget, soon to be
presented to Council, will include a recommendation to set aside
$500,000 to assist in pursuing economic development activities;
recommended action be taken while the three consulting firms are still
available to integrate the General Plan Update Program, the
Feasibility Study Improved Freeway Access, and the Redevelopment
Implementation Strategy.
Gary Werner, Vice -President, MSI, stated the Redevelopment
Implementation Strategy Report reviewed the existing opportunities in
the City and assessed the City's financial resource capabilities to
determine if resources are available to pursue economic development
activities; the analysis indicates that one of the most significant
resources available to the City and the Agency is in Area B, which
consists of approximately 115 acres, and located in the vicinity of
the freeway and Barton Road, designated for general commercial usage
in the Land Use Policy Map; the Report recommends encouraging and
facilitating development of that area consistent with the General
Plan; feels this area is the best opportunity for the City to optimize
sales tax revenues; stated development of this area will take time,
will require advance planning, and will require proactive measures by
the City, as outlined on pages 25-28 in the Report.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned if there is a deadline for the
termination of the consulting services; was not aware of a deadline.
Gary Werner indicated he felt his firm's contractual obligation
terminated when the Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report was
approved and accepted by the City/Agency; Paul Secord,
Beland/Associates, Inc., indicated his firm's contractual obligation
will be concluded when the final General Plan Update Program, as
amended, is presented and approved, and the necessary copies are
printed. John Starner, CG Engineering, indicated his firm's
contractual obligation will be concluded when and if action is taken
on the recommendations submitted for consideration at this meeting
relative to the Feasibility Study Improved Freeway Access. Ray Bragg,
President, MSI, stated although MSI's contractual obligation was
completed two meetings ago when the Redevelopment Implementation
Strategy Report was accepted, hopes his firm's relationship with the
City will extend for a considerable length of time; would like to see
the City pursue the strategies presented in the Report; due to concern
for the City, his firm will continue to be available as long as needed
by the C i ty .
Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated she has never been opposed to
commercial development; has previously been opposed to the approach;
recommended following MSI's recommendations of multiple usage in Area
B, short-term development on Barton Road to provide revenue to develop
Area B, and involving the Chamber of Commerce, since they have
indicated a desire to assist the City with commercial development;
felt funds are not presently available to assemble property.
Page 7 -
1/5/84
Councilman Nix questioned only recommending action to implement
Objective I-1, feeling implementation of Objectives I-1 and I-2 is
needed; recommended having the Chamber work with the City in an active
role to develop a plan for implementing I-1 and I-2, which would allow
consideration of alternatives, the amount of land needed for possible
development, and a green -belt buffering area; felt action was
previously taken to form a joint City/Chamber committee for this
purpose; concurs with the need to become aggressive in marketing the
area.
Councilman Rigley stated if funds are to be set aside for economic
development, as recommended by Staff, funds will not be available for
air conditioning the schools and storm drains; felt professional
assistance is needed to attract commercial development.
Councilman Nix noted that although City funds are restricted at this
time, there are alternative financial opportunities available;
requested that Mr. Werner address this matter. Mr. Werner stated he
understands there are financial mechanisms available such as a bond
whereby the Agency, upon consummation of a development agreement on a
particular piece of property, can pledge projected tax increment to a
financial instrument; an industrial development bond is an instrument
whereby an investor pledges the repayment of the bond as being issued
for that development; indicated that when the City's bond issue was
instituted three years ago, the Agencies were required to pledge a
more substantial deposit towards the payback than may now be required;
stated the section of the Health & Safety Code which requires setting
aside 20% of the tax increment for low and moderate income housing
also provides that when the need for this housing is less than the
amount of funds accruing, the Agency can be relieved from a portion of
that requirement; stated the Strategy Report also refers to additional
funds available to the Agency,
Planning Commission Chairman Collins arrived at 9:10. Commissioner
McDowell left the meeting at 9:27 p.m.
Mr. Werner stated the Stratec
should be undertaken immediat
presently -pledged tax increme
indicated there may be some C
association with influential
advantage of all options and
development to the community.
y Report indicates plans and activities
ely to consummate future development when
nt becomes available for new bond issues;
hamber residents who have a close
corporations; recommended taking
resources available to attract
Mayor Grant stated he felt a shopping mall would have been good for
the community, but concurs with considering more immediate projects to
bring in needed revenue; is not enthusiastic about warehouses and
storage facilities for that area; indicated Council has made a promise
relative to school air conditioning which must be kept.
Commissioner Hawkinson stated he feels the major issue to be
considered for development of Area B is freeway accessibility;
Page 8 -
1/5/84
Ln
F1
concurred with the MSI Report that development is needed; indicated
business license revenue could be a significant source of income;
indicated concern has been expressed within the community relative to
expending funds for a Civic Center when flooding problems exist; feels
revenue must be generated to finance projects such as this which are
needed in the community.
Councilman Nix concurred that professional assistance is necessary for
innovative financial planning and acquisition to pursue economic
development; also wants assistance and input from the Chamber.
Commissioner Collins indicated an adjustment of attitudes is necessary
to attract commercial development to the community; noted the Planning
Commission previously approved a subdivision which would bring a new
hardware store to the community which has never been built; there is
no longer a hardware store in the community.
Councilman Rigley recommended directing Staff to prepare an RFP for a
consultant to implement Objectives I-1 and I-2 as outlined on pages
25-28 of the Redevelopment Implementation Strategy Report; Mayor Grant
voiced concurrence, but does not want this to interfere with the
previous commitments of air conditioning and storm drains. Councilman
Nix concurred with the commitments; recommended developing a plan and
considering the resources and options available.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, felt a specific plan showing land usage
and impact should be prepared and made available to the residents in
the southwesterly portion of the City so they can address Council on
this matter. Mayor Grant indicated the action proposed is to prepare
a specific plan which would investigate financing and land use
alternatives which, when prepared, would be made available to the
public for comments.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated that at the last Council meeting
Staff was directed to make a graphic layout in response to the Mayor's
suggestion that a green -belt buffer area be established buffering the
residential areas from the commercial and industrial areas; has not
seen this layout; felt more information is needed on how much land
will be available for development which cannot be ascertained until
other matters have been addressed, such as the green belt, developing
Commerce Way, circulation, and determining additional area which will
be required to complete storm drain development and street widening.
Mayor Grant indicated he did not feel approval of this matter would
require specific land allocation; questioned and received response
that the Planning Commission would take no action on this matter.
CC-84-04 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilman Nix, to direct Staff
to prepare an RFP to acquire the services of a professional firm to
assist the City in economic development. Councilman Petta questioned,
with Attorney Nazarek confirming, that there would be no conflict of
interest in voting on this matter. Councilman Nix stated the purpose
Page 9 -
1/5/84
of the motion is to seek assistance in developing alternative
concepts; felt it would be meaningless to draw out a green belt to
protect an area which hasn't been defined; felt this matter, as a
philosophy, as well as information relative to flood control and
traffic flow would have to be provided to the consultant, which would
then be considered in proper time and sequence.
Dennis Evans, 22064 DeBerry, questioned if the residents will be
consulted on the proposed plan to be developed by a consultant.
Attorney Nazarek stated a public hearing would be held on a specific
plan. Motion No. CC-84-04 carried, ALL AYES.
Recess was called at 10:05 p.m. and reconvened at 10:15 p.m., with all
oil /CRA Members present, and Planning Commissioners Collins,
DeBenedet, Caouette, Cole, Hawkinson and Munson present.
FEASIBILITY STUDY - IMPROVED FREEWAY ACCESS
John Starner, Vice -President, CG Engineering, stated preparation of
this study involved the freeway area between Main Street on the south
and Newport Road on the north and concludes with recommended
alternatives. Alternate I - Iowa Avenue Remodel - is feasible, but
involves complications such as crossing two railroads, and dealing
with So. California Edison and other utility companies to extend
Commerce Drive. Alternate II - DeBerry Street -Barton Road Split
Diamond Interchange - involves the improvement of additional access at
DeBerry Street and Barton Road; investigated the possibility of
establishing an interchange at DeBerry Street, leaving Barton Road
intact, which is physically impossible and would not fit the approval
process required by Caltrans; then considered a split diamond
interchange to redistribute traffic and have it work to provide access
to the study area as described in the report; the report was prepared
in a format which can be used by the City as a document for future
use; noted that discussion at this meeting indicates development of
Area B will take several years - recommended using this report in
conjunction with obtaining the process called the State Transportation
Improvement Program process.
Mr. Starner recommended approving the following four items for the use
of the Feasibility Study as an administrative tool and for
consideration of future processes through Caltrans:
(1) Adopt the Feasibility Study as a planning tool for the City's
future growth;
(2) Promote the use of the Report by the Planning Department and the
Agency for proposals or inquiries for major development within the
study area;
(3) A formal submittal of the Report for informational purposes to
the City of Colton for their review of the proposed alternates; and
Page 10 -
1/5/84
(4) With regard to Caltrans and SANBAG and the processes for approval
and for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), that the
City proceed with the processes with Caltrans and SANBAG for inclusion
of a proposed project in the STIP.
Mr. Starner advised the City should adopt an alternative they are
willing to support then proceed with the specific processes for the
formal presentation and review by Caltrans. The Caltrans process
would include the review and approval by their Sacramento headquarters
office. The process for the approval through Caltrans is lengthy so
adequate lead time should be considered for this process. Stated Mr.
Wes McDaniel, SANBAG Director, indicated the City has two options; if
a developer should come in with a large development proposal that
could support and finance a freeway interchange, this report would
still need to be filed with Caltrans; if this does not occur, for
purposes of long-term development, the City should consider the
possibility of getting State funding by submitting the program to
Caltrans and SANBAG to obtain a ranking in the overall STIP.
PCM-84-03 Motion by Commissioner Cole, Second by Chairman Collins, ALL AYES, to
recommend Council/CRA approval of the four recommendations as outlined
by John Starner, CG Engineering.
CC-84-05 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to
approve and adopt the four recommendations as outlined by Mr. Starner,
CG Engineering. Following confirmation by Attorney Nazarek that
Councilman Petta would have no conflict of interest in this matter,
Motion No. CC-84-05 carried, ALL AYES.
Alternate Selection - Freeway Access - Councilwoman Pfennighausen
disagreed with the Staff recommendation to select Alternate II,
indicating it would be detrimental to the merchants and potential
developers on Barton Road, would involve an overpass in the area where
a Girl Scout facility has recently been built, and would mean two
off -ramps within a quarter mile of each other; favored Alternate I,
which would also benefit Highgrove. The Planning Commission indicated
the majority of the Planning Commissioners also favored Alternate I,
and felt the split diamond to be the least desirable.
Mr. Starner stated the split diamond is favorable from an engineering
standpoint, since the distribution of traffic into the other local
streets would be better served. Was questioned and responded that
both alternatives would cost approximately $5 Million Dollars, not
including right -of -wady acquisition. Councilman Nix, with Mayor Grant
concurring, indicated a preference for the Iowa Alternative, noting
they would consider exercising eminent domain with the utility
companies, but not with residents.
CC-84-06 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to
approve Alternate I -Iowa Avenue Remodel, as the freeway access plan to
be submitted to the State for consideration, carried 4-0, with
Councilman Petta abstaining.
Page 11 -
1/5/84
WATER MAIN DAMAGE
Councilwoman Pfennighausen advised that shortly after a 3.5 or 3.7
earthquake occurred this past weekend, sixteen breaks occurred in the
water main system in the City; on Vivienda, south of Van Buren, two
water breaks occurred within sixty feet of each other which ran for
almost five days because the water company lacks personnel and
equipment to handle such occurrences; these were patched and broke
again within a few hours; another break occurred on Vivienda near the
others, one on Barton Road, and two on Michigan between Barton Road
and DeBerry. Stated that discussions with water company employees
revealed that no additional help is hired for such emergencies; there
were only three employees working long hours doing the repair work
with poor and improper equipment. Recommended that the City put the
water company on notice to acquire the necessary equipment and to hire
additional employees, when needed, to maintain the water system and to
make repairs in a timely manner; noted the water fees continue to
increase. Chairman Collins noted the water company proxies will be
mailed out in a month.
ADJOURN - The Joint Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council/CRA
and Planning Commission adjourned at 10:48 p.m. The next regular
Planning Commission Meeting will be held February 6, 1984 and the next
Council/CRA Meetings will be held January 12, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
City Ir
"Ark
APPROVED:
Page 12 -
1/5/84
CO ;C1L AGENDA ITEM f 314
60 CHEC GISTER NO. 012684
PAGE NO. 1
GRAND TERRACE PEtiD!NG CITY
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-072 C- APPROVAL DATE 01/26/84
PAYEE
"HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
0.
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D
LL AMERICAN ASPHALT
PAY #1 IMPROVEMENTS ON G.T. 8-4901-255
RD, DEBERRY, PICO BAL.$16,696 8-4904-255
ASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER,COM.SVCS 0-4190-238
BOTTLED WATER,C/M 0-4190-238
BOTTLED wATER,FINANCE 0-4190-238
A BUILD.INDUSTRY ASSOC.
"BAL.CEQA & HOUSING" 0-4120-210
PUBLICATION
ALIF. PARKS & RECREATION
REG.P&R CONF.3/84,ANSTINE 3-4430-270
H J MATERIALS LABORATORY
COMPACTION TEST.PICO/ORIO 8-4904-255
OLTON, CITY OF
W.N.D.SERVICE 1/84 k-4570-802
OLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DiSTRI
C/C MEET. 12/1,12/8,12/14 0-4110-242
COM.SVCS.P_UILD.RENT 1984 0-4190-242
PLAN.COM.12/5/83 0-4801-242
SQUARE DANICE,12/3/83 3-4430-242
UPY LINE CORP.
RENT COPIER,1/13-2/13/84 �0-4190-240
NNIEL'S LANDSCAPING SERVICE�3-4430-245
PARK MAINT. 12/83
INV NO. I
5399 I
5399
16011
1606
Ib07
16869
415
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
AMOUNT I NO. AMOUNT
10500.00
51141.22 1855
19.00
14.60
9.50 1856
9.00 �18571
70.00 P39051
266.50 �1858'
18595.35 p3899
90.00
101.00
25.00
60.00 L1859
175.51 �1860
750.00 �1861
EFDEFECOMPI.P/RSEND.12/30N83�0-2164-000 I I 572.00
61641.22
42.50
9.00
70.00
266.50
18595.35
276.00
175.51
750.00
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 2
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-072 DATE 01/26/84
PAYEE WARRANT CHECK
:MER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN
91.
DESCRIPTION I ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO. I AMOUNT
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 0-2170-000
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 0-4120-139
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 0-4125-139
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 0-4140-139
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 0-4180-139
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 3-4430-139
DEF.COMP.P/R END.12/30/83 1-4572-139
aRDNER RUBBER STAMP CO.
BANDS FOR DATE STAMP,PADS 0-4125-210
ARBER COMPANY
REPAIR RUADS,VARIOUS
6-4900-255
LOCATIONS
ERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL
RENT FORKLIFT,REMOVE XMAS10-4180-240
DECORATIONS C/H
PS SERVICES INCORPORATED
STREET SViEEP 12/27 & 1/3
18-4908-255
STREET SWEEP 1/10/84
18-4908-255
;NTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMEN
EVALUATE LOCAL GOV.FIN.
10-4120-210
PUBLICATION
!ICAK & ASSOCIATES
STAFF ENGINEERING
10-4120-601
110-4170-250
GENERAL ENGINEERING
COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC
110-4170-255
BUILDING & SAFETY
I10-4330-255
PLANNING
d0-4370-255
COM.CENT.RESTROOMS
110-4592-600
DRAINAGE,GAGE CANAL
i10-4594-600
PUBLIC WORKS -ENGINEERING
I10-4610-255
ARCHITEC.BARRIER REMOVAL
ill-4902-600
RECONST.BART.N/E CITY LIMITS
46-4930-600
PICO/ORIOLE WIDENING
48-4901-600
RESURFACE DEBERRY
d8-4904-600
2428
037971
713
725
12.67
576.95
384.63
494.54
231.95
185.35
110.35
39011
20.88 �18621
1919.40 j 18631
153.75 1118641
84912
424..56 �1865
50.00 111866
2509.98
1639.50
1004.25
2635.50
2585.30
539.95
54.00
888.85
1868.20
4180.40
24.00
1307.05 1186,
2568.441
20.88 1
191'9.90
153.75I
1271.68
50.00
19236.98
GRAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-072
PAYEE
'BIER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
i�
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D I INV. NO. I
ANIER BUSINESS PROD.
MAINT.MICROSETTE,10/83-
0-4120-246
09570
9/84
EAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES
MEMBERSHIP,LCC 19R4
0-4190-265
INCREASE ADOPTED BY GENERAL
ASSEMBLY 1983
IRGIL LIVELY
CROSS.GUARD 1/3-1/13/84
7-4910-250
lICHAEL LUNA
LOCAL MILEAGE,LUNA
0-4180-271
IOHN MCDO;NF_LL 1
RETURN DONATION,NOT USED
10-2180-000
JEAN MYEPS
CROSS GUARD 1/5 8 1/17/84
7-4910-25'0
VATIONAL CHEMSEARCH
TEXITE,STREET REPAIR
6-4900-220
74301
AINE WEBER CASH FUND
RET.P/R END. 12/30/83
0-2167-000
RET.P/R END. 12/30/83
0-4120-140
RET.P/R END. 12/30/03
0-4125-140
RET.P/R END. 12/30/83
0-4140-140
RET.P/R END. 12/30/A3
0-4180-140
RET.P/R END. 12/30/P3
3-4430-140
RET.P/R END. 12/30/83
1-4572-140
ARRIS 8 PEARCE
COM.CENT.RESTROOIA PAY #1
10-4592-255
BAL. $9,967
PAGE NO. 3
DATE 01/26/84
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
AMOUNT NO AMOUNT
21.00 L1868
1260.00 1869
101.76 L1870
70.73 L 1871
50.00 11872
25.44 1873
574.39 L1874
43.86
395.2b
263.50
338.80
158.90
126.98
75.60 390?
5233.27 187!
21.00
1260.00
101.76
70.73
50.00
25.44
574.39
1402.90
5233.27
GRAND TERRACE
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-072
PAYEE
BARI
It
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
EOPLE HELPERS INC
REC•SVCS.12/16/83-1/12/84
3-4430-250
ITNEY BONES
RENT.POST.METER,3/1-5/31/
0-4190-240
RENT.POST.METER,3/1-5/31/
1-4572-240
OSTAL INSTANT PRESS
PRINT,GOV.TASK FORCE
0-4190-210
PRIMT,GOV.TASK FORCE
0-4190-210
REPORT
UBLI*C UTILITIES COMMISSION
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT,PUB.
10-4120-210
ANCHO READY MIX
CEMENT,REPAIR BART.RD.
6-4�00-220
'ALT RANKIN
LITTER LININATOR,PARK
3-4444-700
EGENTS-UC
REG.GOV.ACCT.BARB.M.ELIZ.
p-4140-270
CLASS AT UCR
AN BONO CO CENTRAL CR UNION
EMP.DED.P/R END. 12/30/8310-2165-000
AN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF
EPDXY,(PAVEMVIT TYPE)
16-4900-220
hERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL
LA6 ENFORCEMENT'1/84
10-4410-256
IGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
MAINT.SIGNALS,(3)
6-4909-255
INV NO. I
85469I
85469
8406 I
4646
1958 1
6403
391
G068
5534
PAGE NO. 4
DATE 01/26/84
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT
1391.75 1876 1391.75
31.40
31.41 �18771
120.05
16.43 �18781
25.00 1118791
103.35 418801
422.56 �1881
250.00 P3897
1508,24 23902
45.26 1188i
32249.00 p3891
199.23 �188;
62.81
136.48 1
25.00
103.35
422.56
250.00
1508.24
45.26
32249.001
I
i
R 199.23
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 5
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-07 2 DATE 01 / 26 / 84
PAYEE WARRANT CHECK
i':HER WRITTEN
� DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT
0. CALIF. EDISON COMPANY
2 LIGHTS, PARKS 1/10/84
3-4430-238
ELEC.SIG.(3)1/6/84
6-4510-238
U. CALIF. GAS COMPANY
LAS,C/H 12/83
0-4190-238
pUIRES LUMBER COMPANY
INSERTS/RESTROOM,C/H
0-4180-245
WOOD,REPAIR IN PARK
3-4430-245
REDI-MIX,STREET PATCH
6-4900-220
POST/AOLTS,SCHOOL SIGN
6-4900-220
TARGET CHEMICALS
HERRICIOEINEED CONTROL,
6-4900-220
STREETS
ARGET CHEMICALS
REG.CHEM.U'URKSHOP,2/84,
3-4430-270
RANDY & MIKE
THEATRE ON THE TERRACE
C/C APPPUVED 10/26/83
0-4803-220
IGER SYSTEMS
RENT STORAGE BIN,1/84
0-4110-240
tGGY TROTTIER
LOCAL MILEAGE,TROTTIER
0-4140-271
LOCAL MILEAGE,TROTTIEP
1-4572-271
ANIER GRAPHICS CORP.
PRINT PARKING CITATIONS
0-4412-210
ERTICAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
PROCESS PARK.CITES 11/83
10-4412-255
848
848
417
327
3366 1
31.94
229.69 �18841
203.23 �18851
3.16
3.39
213.09
15.48 1886
802.00 �1887
80.00 3906
2000.00 33904
60.00 L188a
7.13
6.90 1885
86024 1056.40 189(
3012
81.50 �189
261.631
203.23 !,
50.12
802.00
80.00
2000.00�
I
60.00
i
1y.03 �
1056.40
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 6
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 8u-072 DATE 01/26/84
PAYEE WARRANT CHECK
":HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN
Im,
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT
ESTERN EXTEPNINATORS
EXTERMINATE C/H 1/84 0-4180-245
EXTERMINATE FIRE STATION 0-4180-245
EST PUBLISHING CO.
UPDATE GOVEPNMENT CODE 0-4125-210
AMPESE & DE BENEDET
RENT,C/H 2/84 0-4190-242
'HILLIP PAGE
PARK CAPE,9/83 & 12/83 3-4430-245
!ICHARD P. ROSS
,4WD. REFUND ROSS 1-3114-000
vILLIG FRIEGHTLINE
DELIVERY CHG. ON TEXITE 6-4900-220
2AYROLL
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 0-2161-000
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 10-2162-000
PAYROLL UJOING 12/30/83 10-2163-000
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 10-2164-000
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 10-2165-000
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 10-2167-000
PAYROLL ENDINNG 12/30/83 10-2170-000
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 10-4120-110
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 0-4125-110
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 0-4140-110
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 0-4180-110
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 3-4430-110
PAYROLL ENDING 12/30/83 1-4572-110
418831
57040
0.00
75.00 �18921
40.28 �18931
625.00 �18941
270.00 41895l
2.80 11896
49.89 11897
1427.52-
257.21-
99.65-
572.00-
1508.24-
43.86-
12.67-
3187.56
2125.02
2732.28
1281.48
1024.01
609.68
123.00 1
40.28 1
625.00 1
270.00
2.80
49.89
7039.88
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 7
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-072 DATE 01/26/84
PAYEE WARRANT CHECK
�C�HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT
BITTEN 99178.83
REPAID 65763.81
CCRUED .00
OTAL 164942.641
RECAP 9Y FUND
FUND 10
FUND 11
FUND 13
FUND 16
FUND 17
FUND 18
FUND 21
RE -PAID
44886.49
.00
1486.34
.00
.00
.00
19390.98
RITTEN
21552.55
1868,20
2929.64
8147,68
127.20
64512.45
41,11
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST F MY KNOWLEDGE, T E AFOR LISTED CHECKS FOR P YMENT OF CITY '
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY 4E AND ARE NECESSA Y AND kPPROPRIATE EX ENDIT RES FOR THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY.
EDW RD R. CLARK
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER
rl T
STO�FF REP09
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 1-26-84
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13_ +
SUBJECT: Resolution endorsing Court Reform Initiative
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
A similar resolution to the proposed resolution attached was adopted by the City of
Lakewood. Captain Bradford had discussed this natter at a previous meeting. He has
reviewed the resolution and expressed his desire that Council consider its adoption.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE COURT REFORM INITIATIVE.
ME:id
Enclosure
RESOLUTION NO. 84-_
4
VZWDIMG GTY
COUN�1� APPROu.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE COURT
REFORM INITIATIVE.
WHEREAS, the administration of criminal justice has become
increasingly cumbersome in California under the weight of unnecessary delays
and prohibitive costs caused by court inefficiency; and
WHEREAS, the California court system is hampered by the search for
technical imperfections in criminal cases which permit guilty criminals to
obtain reversals of convictions to commit new crimes and create new victims;
and
WHEREAS, the Federal judicial system already employs a jury selection
process which streamlines the search for a fair and impartial jury without
permitting the unlimited questioning of jurors permitted by California courts;
and
WHEREAS, reforms in the preliminary hearing process, grand jury
indictments, and less -than -unanimous verdicts will save both time and taxpayer
costs while protecting the fairness and equality of criminal justice; and
WHEREAS, technical delays in the trial process escalate the cost of
court cases and reinforce the principle that justice delayed is justice
denied; and
WHEREAS, denial of parole or probation can be an effective deterrent
to further criminal activity if denial is made promptly; and
WHEREAS, the criminal court initiative would permit judges to revoke
probation, allow the Board of Prison Terms to order paroles revoked, restore
the Grand Jury in indictments, adopt the Federal jury selection process,
permit less -than -unanimous jury verdicts in most cases, make continuances
difficult to obtain, reduce the number of technical defense motions during
preliminary hearings, and curtail time-consuming private questioning of jurors
in death penalty cases; and
WHEREAS, the initiative does not impair the civil rights of any
defendant;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace endorses the goals of the Court Reform Initiative.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said City Council urges Grand Terrace
residents to read the criminal court initiative and become better informed
about its goals and positive effects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to circulate
appropriate copies of this Resolution to other California cities requesting
additional endorsements.
ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1984.
Fact Sheet:
fly
Better
Our initiative would:
1. permit judges to promptly revoke probation when an individual commits
a new crime
2. permit the Board of Prison Terms or other appropriate agency to revoke
parole promptly when an individual commits a new crime
3. restore power of Grand Jury indictments
4. adopt a practice similar to the Federal method of jury selection
5 follow the lead of other states in requiring a less than unanimous jury
verdict for acquittal or conviction (except in special circumstances)
6. make continuances more difficult for either party to obtain
7. reduce very- technical defense motions during Preliminary Hearing
proceedings
8. curtail time-consuming private questioning of jurors in death penalty cases
10ij, does the California court spstem
The administration of justice has become increasingly cumbersome in
need reform?
California. Unnecessary court delays are disheartening to victims, witnesses,
law officers, prosecutors, and judges. And, the justice process has become
prohibitively expensive.
The 1973 trial of Juan Corona cost some $500,000 His recent retrial cost
some $4.6 million! Costs in the Hillside Strangler trial have already reached
$1.2 million. And, the end is not in sight. The Criminal Department of the
Los Angeles County Superior Court now costs over$4,000 per day.
But isn't the search for justice more
Of course, no expense should be spared in the determination of truth and the
important than money?
fair administration of justice Nor should the rights of defendants be violated.
But California's criminal justice system has degenerated from a search
for the truth into a search for technical imperfections. Guilty criminals
obtain reversals of convictions. Crime victims and society pay through new
victimization.
But justice, though due to the accused, is due to the accuser
also. The concept of fairness must not be strained till it is
narrowed to a filament. We are to keep the balance true.
Snyderv. Massachusetts, 291 U.S 97, 122 (1934).
N7g does the jury selection process
Recent California Supreme Court rulings have greatly increased the time and
need to be streamlined?
costs necessary to select a jury by allowing unlimited questioning of prospective
jurors by attorneys. In Ventura County, for example, jury selection time in
non -death penalty cases has increased 138 percent since 1976 Jury selection
in the Hillside Strangler case took four months and in one Riverside County
murder trial, jury selection took five months.
(continued)
What will the proposed reforms do
in terms of jury selection?
147tat made the Grand fury system
impotent in California?
Are Constitutional rights violated by
less than unanimous jury verdicts?
California will follow the Federal practice where judges
ask questions submitted by the lawyers This still allows the
defendant to be tried by a fair and impartial jury but time — and expense —
are greatly reduced.
A recent Governor's stud} in New York estimated that adopting the Federal
system in that state would mean "trial time savings equivalent to the work
product of 26 additional judges."
Again, the California Supreme Court has ruled that defendants are entitled
to a preliminary hearing even though the Grand Jun has issued an indictment
with probable cause EssentiallN , this ruling slows the administration of justice
and increases the taxpayer's burden. The preliminan• hearing unnecessarih
duplicates the work of the Grand Jun'
In one case, the Grand Jury issued an indictment in September 1981 The
eight defendants surrendered in that same month Thev were arraigned in
October 1981 (two of the defendants pleaded guilt-,) BUT, the preliminan
hearing, originally set for December 1981, has now been continued five
times' The next preliminan• hearing has been scheduled for August 1983
The result is a probable loss of approximateh $100.000 so far.
No The United States Supreme Court has ruled that less than unanimous
verdicts are Constitutional. Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U S 356, 92 S Ct.
1620 (1972). In fact, Oregon and Louisiana follow such a system and it has
worked well without jeopardizing the rights of the accused.
A verdict of 10 to 2 or 11 to I in criminal cases for acquittal or conviction
does not mean that criminals would go free or innocent persons be convicted
It does mean that expensive retrials which now result from hung juries would
be avoided The cost is immense and there is the terrible pressure on the
victim and witnesses who must undergo a second ordeal
In death penalty cases, however, unanimous verdicts would still be required
These reforms would substantially alleviate the problem of unnecessary
delay now afflicting our courts, correcting bottlenecks in the justice
system which slow down the process or permit some defense attorneys to
slow it down.
Paid for by Citizens for Better Public Sofeny through Court Reform.
13273 Ventura BW., Suite 100, Studio CaY, CA 91604 (213) 981-1733
STgAFF REPOJRTDate:
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX)
AGENDA ITEM NO. C-.
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 26, 1984
SUBJECT: REQUEST ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES, PARKING CITATIONS
FUNDING IS REQUIRED X
FUNDING IS NOT REQUIRED
In preparing the 1983-84 budget, staff underestimated the number of citations that
would be issued. The street sweeping program is one of the contributing factors to
our error. The City contracts with Vertical Management Systems for the accounting
and processing of our parking citations. Current charges are 50¢ per ticket with an
additional $1.50 for processing delinquent citations. Underestimating the number of
tickets to be written and processing based on a price rate, results in this line
item running short of funds. Staff is requesting that Council allocate an
additional $1,100 to Line Item No. 10-4412-255, Contractual Services, Parking
Citations.
The funds to come from Balance Forward, leaving a balance of $558,335.
Staff recommends that the Council:
ALLOCATE $1,100 TO LINE ITEM NO. 10-4412-255, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES, PARKING
CITATIONS FROM BALANCE FORWARD.
TC:Io
(CCJan26-3)
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
® JAN 2 6 i°Pn
Minutes of the January W, 1984 meeting. 11GiL AGENDA ITEM 9 .5 G
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Barbara Mathews at 7 PM in the
Red Carpet Realty Conference Room. Those present were Ann Petta, Irene
Mason, Barbara Bayus, Betty Duarte, Hannah La ister and Barbara Mathews.
Secretaries' report was read and accepted with a correction in item #3 - Ann
was making calls to participants of the Country Fair, not to persons about
interviews. Since Koleta Green has not responded to our letter to return the
tape she has, Ann will try to contact her by phone. The Treasurer reported
that next years' budget will be submitted in the same amount as this years'.
At next month's meeting, we will review the committee's goals.
City Flag: Randy Anstine will ask the Council for a two-sided flag at the
next council m--eting. This will involve more money per flag.
(0 )
Packing House: Barbara Mathews and Joe Kesicak will survey the building
together and then he will give a report on who owns the building, value, etc.
Theater Group: Ann spoke to Linda Pue who has been out of town but who wanted
the committee to know that the letter from the Mayor had been received and will
be acted upon. A letter will then be written to the Mayor and the Committee
with the results. The January production had to be cancelled due to casting
problems.
Three members of the committee attented the Christmas party and all agreed
it was very nice. The opening on the committee to replace Art Thiede has been
posted; no takers yet. An invitation was received by the committee for the
farewell party for Ed Clark. Barbara has requested a file cabinet (two drawer)
in which to file all the paperwork she has collected. Ann did a great job of
contacting participants in the country fair and listing all their comments and
suggestions. These will be discussed at the next meeting.
An Art Group was suggested and having a fine arts fair as well as the yearly
country fair. It was also suggested that we make a canvas of Grand Terrace
residents to see who might be interested in music, painting, dance, hobbies
to keep on file. This will be discussed further at the next meeting and all
members to jot down ideas so that a questionaire can go out with the March
sewer billings.
A discussion was made of putting up stanchions on Barton Road at the Community
Center to fly banners when any committee has a fair they are putting on. Betty
will look into the cost of having a permanent sign made for the Country Fair.
Barbara Bayus was elected Chairman of the Country Fair for 1984.
The next meeting will be February 6, 1984.
Re 'pectfully,submitted,
llannah Laister, Secretary
Meeting was adjourned at 8 PM.
kt`;vIVr I
JAN 121984
;r0r -c hr,! ,1 Tcr
1 -1 -�PPORTS
COMMISS!0f,Pq a V TTi — P
JAN 2 611"4
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 1/12/84 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM it 5C DATE: 1/10/83
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: Historical & Cultural Committee
SUBJECT: Stanchions on Barton Road at Community Center
PROBLEM:
Facts: After each fair the committee has held, a survey has been taken for reactions '
and suggestions. More publicity is always foremost, even though most of those people
who had not heard about these events do not get newspapers, only sleep in Grand Terrace,
have no children, etc. It 'lla's been proposed that stanchions be put up on Barton Road
at the Community Center, one on each side, so that banners may be flown across
the road for a month or so before ea ch event. The Swim tea m, Pa rk s and Recreati nn
committee would also benefit from this proposal.
ALTERNATIVES:
0
SOLUTION: These stanchions would run $2, 500-$3, 000 but there is money in our budget.
We are asking the Council to approve this expenditure.
REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF:
WOUld the Council please approve of this expenditure. JAN 12 W4
jc.r_Pertn►Trr
E10
.•7
TO: Grand Terrace City Council
FROM: Crime Prevention Committee
DATE: 3 January 1984
JAN 2 61984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM J 5-e
The meeting was called to order at 7:09 P. M. by Vice -Chairman Gary Carnes.
Members present: Gary Carnes, Joe Ramos, Susan Crawford
Visitors present: Joe Frink, San Bdno SO
Minutes of the December 12, 1983 meeting were read and approved.
The committee discussed presentation of Certificates of Merit to citizens who
assisted the Sheriff's Department in the apprehension and conviction of persons
involved in recent criminal activity in Grand Terrace. Sheriff's reports on
citizens to be commended were reviewed by the Committee and it was decided that
all 7 citizens recommended by Detective Frink for awards would be awarded
Certificates of Merit.
Joe Ramos advised he talked to Miriam Eckert of 'we Tip' who would provide a
representative to explain the program. She also indicated the enrollment fee was
negotiable. The Committee unanimously decided to invite a representative so an
informed recommendation concerning enrollment or non -enrollment could be made to
city council.
Susan Crawford will obtain safety/crime prevention books from the Automobile Club
and distribute them to city elementary schools.
The Committee also decided to buy 4 etching pencils for use by citizens for
marking personal property.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M.
The next meeting is scheduled for 16 January 1984.
Respectfully submitted
Jo V
amos, Secy.
RECEIVED
JAN 17 fauWW-W
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
JANNbbd4
aMUNCY OPERATIONS CM-1ITTEE
November 179 1983
MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Emergency Operations Committee was held on
November 17, 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ncike Harris, Chairman
Edward Luers
Vic Pfennighausen
Don Minesinger
Staff Present: Tom Coyle, Administrative Assistant
Guest: James Hodder
o This meeting was held at the California Department of Forestry
Emergency Operations Center in Riverside, Ca. The -prime purpose was
to tour a facility that is equipped as an Incident Command Center.
From this tour and possible future field trips this committee can
establish the requirements for this city!s EOC.
o The next meeting will be held on December 15, 1983.
Respectfully submitte ,
I':lke Barris, hai rman
RECEIVED
JAN 2 31?
CITY 0� ORANP TERRACE
STAFF REP GRT (5�*)
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: JANUARY 26, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. T * FOR INFORMATION ONLY
SUBJECT: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NEWSLETTER
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
At their regular meeting of December 14, 1983, Council discussed the idea of a
community newsletter with representatives of the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce.
At their regular meeting of January 12, 1984 Mayor Pro Tempore Jim Rigley and
Councilwoman Barbara Pfennighausen were appointed members to serve on a committee
to discuss a joint venture community newsletter with the Grand Terrace Chamber
of Commerce.
The staff person assigned to this project is Mr. Joe Kicak, City Engineer.
Staff recommends that the Council:
FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
.,A S T9A F F R E P OaR T (3'*) ,
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE: JANUARY 23, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5S * FOR INFORMATION ONLY *
SUBJECT: VIOLATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 73 PERTAINING TO VEHICLES CARRYING RUBBISH
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
On January 18, 1984 at 8:30 a.m. City Manager Seth Armstead and Mr. Ernie Zampese
attended traffic court before Judge Isaeff. The charge was violation of California
Vehicle Code Section 23115 and City Ordinance No. 73 which purported to regulate
vehicles carrying rubbish and other material on city streets.
At the direction of the City Council, City Manager was to defend Mr. Zampese as
he felt he was complying with the city's ordinance.
Inadvertently the City Council ordinance is in conflict with vehicle code
section 23115 which states that vehicles loaded with trash or rubbish of any
kind being transported to a dump site over a highway should be totally covered
to prevent the load from spilling or falling from the vehicle.
Judge Isaeff felt after hearing the case, that it was an unusual case. The
Assistant District Attorney whom Mr. Armstead contacted at Judge Isaeff's
request, also felt the case was unusual and that it would be in the best interest
of justice that the citation against Mr. Zampese be dismissed since the City Council
of Grand Terrace wished that Mr. Zampese not be punished as a result of the
inadvertent error in the City Ordinance No. 73. City Ordinance No. 73 is to be
heard at a City Council meeting in the near future for correction.
Our City Attorney wrote a letter on January 17, 1984 to the San Bernardino County
Municipal Court asking that the citation against Mr. Zampese be dismissed in
the best interest of justice. Judge Isaeff dismissed the citation, fine and
expunged the citation from Mr. Zampese's driving record.
Staff recommends that the Council:
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
SA: Io
C
r�
COPPOR!q
µsF
y�VCMBfiP �a-�0 .:
January 17, 1984
San Bernardino County Municipal Court
Central Division - Traffic
351 N. Arrowhead Ave.
San Bernardino, CA 92415
To whom it may concern:
HUGH J GRANT
Mayor
JW RIGLEY
Mayor Pro Tern
Council Members
TONY PETTA
ROY W. NIX
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
SETH ARMSTEAD
City Manager
MYRNA ERWAY
City Clerk
EDWARD R.CLARK
Finance 8 Administrative
Semces Officer
Please be advised that Mr. Erminio Zampese was cited by
San Bernardino County Sheriff's Deputy Mark Cha m berlaine,
Citation No. SH 24-8829 issued on December 21, 1983 for
violation of CVC Section 23115.
Mr. Zampese had been present at a meeting of the Grand Terrace
City Council in which the City Council had adopted its
ordinance number 73 purporting to regulate vehicles carrying
rubbish and other materials on city streets. Inadvertently,
the City Council ordinance is in conflict with Vehicle Code
Section 23115, a copy of the vehicle section and of the
city ordinance is attached hereto. Since Mr. Zampese was
aware of the city's ordinance and felt that he was complying
with the law it would seem to be in the best interest of
justice that the citation against Mr. Zampese be dismissed.
The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has directed
that I notify you of this conflict in order that Mr. Zampese
not be punished as a result of their error. In addition,
the City Council is in the process of amending its ordinance
to correct this oversight.
Thank you very much for your Vsistance.
R spectfu11 yo rs,
c
Ivan L. Hopkins
City Attorney
ILH:lo
Encs. 2
22795 BARTON ROAD
GRANDTERRACz CA92324-5295
CITY MANAGER — CITY CLERK (714) 824-6621
FINANCE — COMMUNITY SERVICES (7141 824-7226
ENGINEERING — PLANNIN,; (714) 825-3625
ERPI1,1C
11;63 EY FILL
GR, NO TERRACE
G E/CITATION NO:
S I-1 iv CITATION DATE:
PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH
LArN�S� YAR PAYMENT IN THE ENCLOSED
EITTELOPE.
CA S2324 DO NOT SEND CASH
Sh 24882S VIOLATIONS. VC. 23115
12-21-83
1-1c-64 - --
YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED TO APPEAR IN COURT ON AT � DO f1""FdR THE TRAFFIC
VIOLATIONS ABOVE. YOU MAY SETTLE THIS CASE BEFORE THE APPEARANCE DATE BY TAKING ACTION IN
REMARKS BELOW AND PAYING THE BAIL AMOUNT IF INDICATED, FAILURE TO APPEAR CAN RESULT IN A
$500 FINE OR SIX MONTHS IN JAIL. SEND SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE IF RECEIPT REQUESTED.
s31.c0
rREIyI�'uh- VCNEY CRCER, CHECA
CR Tr_ USE t'ASTER CART; —VISA
C-4LL 23C 646-4S2G
12 14817 349 (10 781
Sh 30iNC f+U.,-I-CENTRAL
SrGCn:: FLCC:�, CC,urThC.1SE
SAN 3ERNARCIAC GA 92415
IF ALREADY PAID — PLEASE DISREGARD
If you elect to Pnpear in court at night, a
night court is available at 1050 I•Test 6th
Street, Ontario, CA, at 6:00 p.m. lbe date
for appearance at the night court a -ill be
the Vednesday night preceding the date you
were to appear in day court. firing a copy
of the citation to night court with you.
23110 AMIL VEHICLE CODE
Note 4
4. urea utiren s arrest. and saltdtts or arrest continued even
Pri.ate se;urrty gu r i who ohservea nunof comma thourh cusasty of mrruor was transferred to rvace officer
mtsucrncanor ry throwtn� mis.:le at srnizic and its occu• In re Roiand K. (19-h) Id- Cal.Rptr 96. S_ CA Ad 29s
pants on highway was entitled to place minor under
§ 23112. Throwing, depositing, or dumping matter on highway
(a) No person shall throw or deposit, nor shall the registered owner or the driver, if such owner is
not then present in the vehicle, aid or abet in the throwing or depositing upon any highway any bottle,
can, garbage, glass, nail, offal, paper, wire, any substance likely to injure or damage traffic using the
highway, or any noisome, nauseous, or offensive matter of any kind.
(b) No person shall place, deposit, or dump, or cause to be placed, deposited, or dumped, any rocks,
refuse, garbage, or dirt in or upon any highway, including any portion of the right-of-way thereof,
without the consent of the state or local agency having jurisdiction over the highway.
(Amended by Stats.1976, c. 213, p. 399, § 2; Stats.1980, c. 74, p. 190, § 4.)
19'6 Amendment. Included "refuse, garbage" in subd.
(b).
1980 Amendment. Deleted subd. (c).
§ 23114. Spilling loads on highways
Supplementary Index to Notes
Searches and seizures 2
2. Searches and seizures
Stop of a towed vehicle on public street for traffic
violation, namely failing to secure a load, and emuing
§ 23115. Rubbish vehicles
search of vehicle at tow yard to examine secret identifica-
tion numbers of vehicle. to determine whether vehicle
was stolen was reasonable where officer discovered that
vehicle had no license plates. that registration wu in
name of person other than name listed on driver's license
of purported owner, and vehicle identification number
plate was not securely fastened but was attached by type
of rnet differing from rivets used by manufacture. Peo-
ple v Burnett i 1980) 165 Cal.Rptr. 781. lo' C.ay.3d 795.
No vehicle loaded with garbage, swill, cans, bottles, wastepapers, ashes, refuse, trash, or rubbish, or
any other noisome, nauseous, or offensive matter, or anything being transported to a dump site for
disposal shall be driven or moved upon any highway uniess the load is totallti. covered ' • ' in a
manner which will prevent the load or an}part of the load from spilling ' ' ' or falling from the
vehicle. This section does not prohibit a rubbish vehicle from being without cover while in the process
of acquiring its load in circumstances wherein no law, administrative regulation, or local ordinance
requires such cover.
This section does not apply to any vehicle engaged in transporting wet waste fruit or vegetable
matter, or waste products from a food processing establishment, nor to any highway maintenance
vehicle operated by. or operated under contract with, any local authority or the state, and eneatred in
transporting snow, mud, earthen slide material, rock, portiand cement, or asphaltic concrete payinL'
and structural materials, to a dump site for disposal.
(Amended by Stats.1975, c. 1166, p. 2E84, § 1.)
19'5 Legislation. "It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act
Section 2 of Stats.l975, c. 1166, p. Z884, provided: to provide the assistance necessary to help overcome the
serious problem of spilled litter along highways leading
to and from dump sites."
§ 23116. Minors in back of motortrucks; application of section
(a) No person driving a motortruck shall transport any minor in the back of the motortruck in a
space intended for any load on the vehicle on a highway unless the space is enclosed to a height of 46
inches extending vertically from the floor, the vehicle has installed means of preventing the minor
from being discharged, or the minor is secured to the vehicle in a manner which will prevent the minor
from being thrown, falling, or jumping from the vehicle.
(b) This section does not apply to the transportation of a minor in the back of the motortruck when
the minor is accompanied by an adult in the back of the motortruck.
Underline indicates changes or addit-ons by amendment
44
k-, '' Y (_ fS. ( _-)
ANk
b. In theosecution charging a violatio f Section l.a from a
motor vehicle, proof that the particular vehicle described in the complaint
was the origin of the litter, together with proof that the defendant named in
the complaint was at the time of such violation the registered owner of said
vehicle, shall consitute in evidence a presumption that the registered owner
was the person who committed the violation.
c. It shall be the duty of every peson distributing commercial
handbills, leaflets, flyers or any other advertising and information material
to take whatever measures that may be necessary to keep such materials from
littering public or private property.
d. To facilitate proper disposal of litter by pedestrians and
motorists, such publicly -patronized or used establishments and institutions as
may be designated by the City shall provide, regularly empty and maintain in
good condition, adequate containers that meet standards prescribed by the
department. This requirement shall be applicable, but not limited to,
fast-food outlet, shopping centers, convenience stores, supermarkets, service
stations, commercial parking lots, mobile canteens, motels, hospitals, schools
and colleges.
Section 2. Vehicles Transporting Loose Materials
a. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation,
institution or organization to transport any loose cargo by truck or other
motor vehicles within the corporate limits of the City of Grand Terrace unless
said cargo is secured in such manner as to prevent depositing litter on public
and private property.
b. The duty and responsibility imposed by Section 2.a shall be
applicable alike to the owner of the truck or other vehicle, the operator
thereof, and the person, firm, corporation, institution or organization from
whose residence or establishment the cargo originated.
c. In the prosection charging a violation of Section 2.a, lack of
adequate securing shall in itself constitute proof a violation has been
committed.
Section 3. Loading and Unloading Operations
a. Any owner or occupant of an establishment or institution at which
litter is attendant to the packing and unpacking and loading and unloading of
materials at exterior locations shall provide suitable containers there for
the disposal and storage of such litter and shall make appropriate
arrangements for the collection thereof.
b. Further, it shall be the duty of the owner or occupant to remove
at the end of each working day any litter that has not been containerized at
these locations.
- 2 -
S -',W4A F F R E P 4,1
Date: 1/19/84
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 1/26/84
AGENDA ITEM NO. _6
SUBJECT: General Plan Update
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
The final approval by resolution of the General Plan Update was to have been
scheduled for this meeting. Discussions held with the Planning Director and the
Consultant have resulted in recommending that this matter be deferred until approval
of the Housing Element has been received from the State HCD.
JBK:ME: id
SliA F F R E P OaR T
12.52-A
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL 'ITEM (x ) METING DATE: Jan. 26, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. � 6
SUBJECT: Vivienda Bridge - INFORMATION ONLY
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED AT THIS TIME
The City Council authorized the staff to request proposals for the design of Vivienda
Bridge under the Federal Bridge Replacement Program. Eight firms were requested to
submit a proposal. These firms were selected, based on the recommendation of CALTRANS
and the City staff, after determination that each of the firms requested was qualified
to perform the work.
The responses to the proposals were received and a panel of interviewers on January 17,
1984, did interview the three consultants who submitted the proposals. The three
consulting firms which did submit proposals were the following:
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
Johnson & Nielsen Associates
DeLeuw, Cather & Company
After the interview, the selection panel determined that the most qualified of the three
consultants was Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers.
The members of the panel that performed the interviews were the following:
Mr. Jack Christie, representing CALTRANS;
Mr. Anthony Gray, Chief Design Engineer, San Bernardino County;
Mr. Neil Smithhammer, Chief, Structural Engineering Section, Riverside County Flood
Control District
The budgeted amount is considerably lower than the amount proposed by the two most
qualified consultants.
It is the intent of the staff to determine whether or not CALTRANS, as well as FHWA
will participate to the extent of 80 percent of the additional cost that may be incurred
as a result of the recommendation of the selection panel. It is,further, the intent of
the staff, if CALTRANS does participate, to prepare a consultant agreement for approval
by CALTRANS and subsequently present it to the City Council for their consideration.
Staff recommendation:
INFORMATION ONLY
JK/lbk
Attachments
M W
MOFFATT & NICHOL
RFMUhEZATION
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has determined compensation for the efforts
involved for the Phase I and II design tasks, in accordance with the
"Scope of Services" outlined in your letter of November 14, 1983 and the
tasks as noted in the "Project Approach" and "Project Tasks and
Schedule" contained in this proposal.
The compensation for the respective phases are as noted below:
Phase I --Preliminary Design
i
Survey, Mapping and Drafting $4,500
' Bridge Economic Study $2,300
Preliminary P.S. and E. $9,900
*
*Foundation Investigation $4,300
i(T&M, not to exceed)
TOTAL PHASE I $21,:00**
*Utility Coordination $2,600**
This cost is based on the availability and applicability of the boring
data from the original Engineering Study, and only one boring required.
If two borings are required, the maximum not to exceed would be $5,450.
**
It is assumed the utility relocation coordination will be handled by
the City. The cost shown is an estimated cost if provided by MtN/CM.
M W ink
Phase II - Final Design
We believe that the basic services for any one of the bridge alternates
and roadway considerations would be reasonably similar and the fee,
approximately the same.
Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates:
Roadway and Drainage $ 6,800
Overhead Bridge Structure $13,800
Specifications and Estimates $ 3,700
CALTRANS - Railroad approval
Review Process $ 1,200
TOTAL PHASE II $25,500
Construction Phase
The exact requirements for this portion of work have not been noted in
the City Requirements. It is assumed that such work would be provided
on an "As Required" basis, with related compensation made on a Time and
Material Basis in accordance with the attached rate schedule.
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has provided resident engineer/inspection
services on other grade separation projects, and has the staff to
provide such services if requested. An estimated figure can be provided
for budgeting purposes if requested.
DeLeuw, Cather & Company
N
ESTIMATED ENGINEERING FEE
VIVIENDA AVENUE OVERHEAD
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA
Task
Project Management, preliminary structural
studies, preparation of Design Memorandum
Liaison with Southern Pacific and
negotiation of Construction and
Maintenance Agreement
Preparation of Public Utilities Commission
Application requesting an Order to
Construct; reproduction of 20 copies of
narrative portions of Application and
graphical exhibits
Structural Engineering - Final Design
Drawings, Drafting, Quantities
Specifications, Contract Documents and
Engineering Estimates
Allowance for Printing & Reproduction,
Reduced Plans and Contract Documents
Subtotal:
Civil Engineering, by L. D. King Engr. Co.
(See attached letter dtd Dec. 20, 1983)
Foundation Borings and Explorations
Total (Inclusive of salaries, overhead
fringe benefits and profit)
13
Estimated Cost
(Range)
$ 2,600 to 3,490
900 to 1,400
350 to 1,050
15,500 to 17,500
3,000 to 3,370
$ 1,200
$23,550 to 28,010
$12,740
$ 4,300 to 5,450
$40,590 to 46,200
JOHNSON NIELSEN ASSOCIATESWonsid ng structural enginoers
CARL B jONNSON
SVEND M NIE:SEN
7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90041 213 • 236.2231 JAMES S. LAI. S. E.
4310 ORANGE STREET. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92301 714 • 666.5122 PER T. RON. S. E
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE SUITE 140. IRVINE CA 92718 714 • 732.7383 C. K. ALLEN. JR.. S. E
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH KICAK, City Engineer
City of Grand Terrace
Engineering Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California
92324-5295
Dear Mr. Kicak;
Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for the Engineering Design
Services required for the Removal and Replacement of the Vivienda Avenue
Overhead Bridge 1 SPTCO 54C-355 in the City of Grand Terrace.
We are extremely interested in this Project and realizing its importance to the
City of Grand Terrace we have brought together a Consulting Team which will
provide a complete and comprehensive design package for the purpose of con-
structing the proposed structure and the approach Roadway including the various
utility facilities.
Our Consulting Firm specializes in Structural Engineering, and we have selected
as sub -consultants L. A. Wainscott & Associates for the Civil Engineering aspects
of the design and LeRoy Crandall and Associates, Consulting Geotechnical Eng-
ineers for the foundation investigation and recommendation of abutment support.
This Proposal includes the Following Parts:
A. Scope of Engineering Services
B. Experience from Similar Projects
C. Composition of the Project Team
D. Fee Proposal
E. Attachment of Brochures For:
1. Johnson E Nielsen Associates
2. L. A. Wainscott E Associates
A. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES: This Proposal consists of Two Elements:
1. Preliminary Design
a. Explore alternate designs to obtain the most economical design compatible
with the requirements for the City of Grand Terrace. Due consideration
will be given to construction sequence.
b. Prepare and furnish preliminary plans including plan S elevation views.
(Con'd) Page #1
JOHNSON iIELSEN ASSOCIATES Qnsidtina structural engineers
CARL a. JONNSON
SVEND M. NIELSEN
J 7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90041 • 213.256.2237
4310 ORANGE STREET. RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92601 714 • 686.5122
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 140, IRVINE. CA 92715 714 • 752-7383
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH KICAK, City Engineer
JAMES S. LAI. S. E.
PER T. RON. S. E.
C. K. ALLEN. JR.. S. E
C. Prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the Project based upon
material quantity take -off.
2. Design and Construction Engineering
a. Prepare completed plans, specifications, contract documents, quantity
and cost estimates and all design calculations for submittal to the City
of Grand Terrace.
Preparation of all plans and contract documents shall meet the require-
ments of the State Department of Transportation(CALTRANS). The
latest editions of Caltrans Standard Specifications and AASHO for High-
way Bridges shall be utilized.
b. Furnish all check prints as needed for processing of preliminary and
final plans by the City, County and State Agencies.
C. Provide representation at all design, field and program reviews and
conferences. Representation shall include stall of the Consultant as
well as Sub -Consultant representatives.
We anticipate that the Project coordination efforts will involve the
following Agencies:
City of Grand Terrace
Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Edison Company
Pacific Telephone Company
Riverside Highlands Water Company
Johnson E Nielsen Associates including Sub -Consultants.
We have included 7-Man-Days for various coordination activities and
we do not anticipate significant technical involvment with Caltrans.
We understand that the area West of the Project is served by a single
water line, which is located in the Vivienda Avenue Bridge. This water
supply will be interrupted by the removal and replacement of the
Bridge unless special measures are taken. We would be pleased to
provide additional professional services for the Design and Coordin-
ation of any temporary facilities that may be required.
d. Provide assistance as necessary to resolve any questions or conflicts
between plans and specifications or bidding documents that may arise
during the period of advertising for bids.
(Con'd)
Page #2
JOHNSON &IELSEN ASSOCIATES Qnsultinq strucfur.z/ cnaine,rs
CARL B. JOHNSON SVEND H N E_SEN
J 7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90041 • 213.256.2237 JAMES S LAI S. E.
4310 ORANGE STREET• RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92301 714 • 666-3122 PER T. RON. S. E.
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE• SUITE 140. IRVINE. CA 92713 714 • 752.7363 C. K. ALLEN. JR.. S. E.
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH K ICAK, City Engineer
e. Provide originals of all plans, specifications, special provisions, re-
ports, estimates and other documents to the City of Grand Terrace.
f. Provide assistance in the resolving of any conflicts and interpret-
ations of the plans and specifications that may occur during construc-
tion.
g. Provide Field Surveying and Topographic Mapping.
h. Provide design of Storm Drain Facilities.
We assume that Storm Drain discharge into the Railroad right-of-way
will be acceptable to all involved parties.
B. EXPERIENCE FROM SIMILAR PROJECTS: Johnson E Nielsen Associates has
Designed the Following Major Bridge Projects in This Area:
1. Vivienda Bridge: Repair and Rehabilitation of Existing Bridge Structure
and Abutments.
Reference: John R. Shone, Director of Transportation
County of San Bernardino
2. Van Buren Bridges: Over Santa Ana River - Riverside
Reference: Robert C. Wales, Public Works Director/City of Riverside
3. Hamner Street Bridge: City of Corona
Reference: Ken Edwards, Riverside County Flood Control,Chief Engineer
4. Dillon Street Bridge: Indio, California
Reference: Joseph C. Guastella, Chief Deputy Road Commissioner
Riverside County
S. S.P.R.R. Grade Separation Bridge and San Timoteo Channel Bridge at
ountain View: Grade Separation Project/Loma Linda, ali ornia
Reference: Noel Christensen, Consultant to City of Loma Linda
6. Temescal Creek Bridges: At Harrison Street, Joy Street, River Road and
Cota Street City of Corona.
Reference: Ken Edwards, Riverside County Flood Control, Chief Engineer
The Sub -Consultant L. A. Wainscott 8 Associates: is experienced in pro-
viding Bridge Approach Design and related Construction Inspection Services.
Members of the Company's Staff have functioned as the primary designers
for several Bridge Projects including the Bear Valley Cutoff Bridge in
Hesperia, the South "E" Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River in San Ber-
nardino and the Van Leuvan Bridge over the San Timoteo Creek in Loma Linda.
The Staff is also experienced in utility relocation design work.
(Con'd) Page #3
•r ,
JOHNSON WNIELSEN ASSOCIATES QonstiltitigstrzictLiralc?zgitioers
CARL B JOHNSON SVEND H NIELSEN
=IWO�
i -
<.: r 7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90041 213 • 256.2237 JAMES S. LAI. S. E.
4310 ORANGE STREET. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 714. 686.5122 PER T. RON. S. E.
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 140, IRVINE. CA 92715 • 714 • 752.7383 C. K. ALLEN. JR.. S. E
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH KICAK, City Engineer
C. COMPOSITION OF THE PROJECT TEAM:
1. The Johnson E Nielsen Associates Project Team
Johnson E Nielsen Associates will provide the Structural Design of the Bridge
Superstructure and Abutments. The Project Team will consist of individuals _
who have expert knowledge- in the Design and Construction of Bridges. Since
we, as consultants, were responsible for the investigation and repair of the
existing Vivienda Avenue Bridge, we have the experience and the knowledge
of the existing conditions and problems associated with the Project.
Our Project Team has been selected with this in mind and include the indivi-
duals who were involved with the design of the repair to the existing Bridge.
Highlights of the Johnson E Nielsen Associates Team members are provided
below, and a more detailed background of the Personnel and experience of
the Firm is contained in the attached Company Brochure.
a. Project Manager:
SVEND H. NIELSEN
Technical University of Denmark MS 1942
Registered Civil and Structural Engineer, State of California, Nevada & Texas
Office Civil Defense, Certificated in Fallout Shelter Analysis and Nuclear Defense
Engineering Protective Construction
Member Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
Member Consulting Engineers Association of California
Member American Society of Civil Engineers
Member Danish Society of Civil Engineers
Member Prestressed Concrete Institute
1942-44 Highway Department, Denmark
1944-46 City Engineer's Office, Copenhagen
1946-48 Sigmund Ivarsson, Structural Engineer, Seattle
1949-56 Kistner, Wright and Wright, Los Angeles
1956 - Date Consulting Structural Engineer
b. Project Coordinator in Charge of Design:
PER T. RON
Technical University of Denmark MS 1951
Registered Civil E Structural Engineer, State of California
Member Structural Engineer's Association of Southern California
Member Danish Society of Civil Engineers
(Con'd) Page #4
Aft
JOHNSON WNIELSEN ASSOCIATES Wonsultin3 structural en�7ineors
CARL 8 JOHNSON SVEND N NIELSEN `
�I 7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET, LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90041 213 • 256.2237 JAMES S. LA1. S. E.
4310 ORANGE STREET, RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92301 714 • 686.5122 PER T. RON, S. E.
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 140. IRVINE, CA 92713 714 • 752-7383 C. K. ALLEN. JR.. S. C
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH KICAK, City Engineer
1951-54 Bridge Division, Copenhagen Highway Department
1954-55 Bechtel Corporation, San Francisco
1955-56 Myron Gould, Consulting Engineer, San Francisco
1956-59 Ropp S Ropp, Structural Engineers, Los Angeles
1959-Date Johnson E Nielsen Associates/Riverside
C. Chief Draftsman and Specification Writer:
DONALD T. IRVING
Los Angeles City College, A.A., 1950
Member Construction Specifications Institute
1950-1952 Kistner, Wright E Wright, Architects E Engineers
1952-1953 Los Angeles Department of Water S Power
1953-1956 Kistner, Wright 6 Wright, Architects S Engineers
1956-Date Johnson S Nielsen Associates
2. The L. A. Wainscott & Associates Project Team
L. A. Wainscott S Associates, Inc, will provide the Civil Design for the Bridge
approach facilities including storm drain, water and sewer relocation and
street design. The Project Team will be comprised of individuals with exper-
ience in areas relevant to the Civil Design of the Vivienda Street Bridge.
Highlights of the L.A. Wainscott team members are provided below, and
Resumes' appear on Appendix A.
RUSSELL SHARP, A registered Civil Engineer in California, will be in re-
sponsible charge of the Vivienda Bridge civil design. Mr. Sharp will be
responsible for the day-to-day supervision of the approach design work
including coordination of all work elements with the Structural Engineer
Johnson S Nielsen Associates, the City of Grand Terrace and with other
affected agencies.
Mr. Sharp has been responsible for the preparation of plans and specifi-
cations for numerous Civil Design Projects. Among the Projects in which
he has been involved include water and sewer system relocation work
related to the construction of the Route 60 Freeway in Glen Avon with the
Interstate 15 in Norco.
ELLIOTT SHAW is a principal of L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. As
supervisor of7esign at L.A.Wainscott E Associates, Mr. Shaw will function
as a technical advisor and provide quality control review for the Vivienda
Bridge approach design work.
(Con'd) Page #5
I
JOHNSON *IELSEN ASSOCIATES insulting structural e►tgincers
CARL B JOHNSON SVEND H. NIELSEN
7462 N. FIGUEROA STREET. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90041 213 • 256.2237 JAMES S. LA1. S. E.
4310 ORANGE STREET. RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92901 714 • 686•5122 PER T. RON. S. E.
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 140. IRVINE. CA 92710 714.752-7383 C. K ALLEN. JR..S. IL
December 23, 1983 Our Job No. #4522
MR. JOSEPH KICAK, City Engineer
Mr. Shaw has over 26 years of experience in Civil Design Field. He has
functioned as the Project Manager of numerous site development and civil
design projects in San Bernardino County. Mr. Shaw's past responsibilities
include the street approach design work for the Bear Valley Bridge(Railroad
Crossing) in Hesperia, and the South "E" Street Bridge crossing the Santa
Ana River in San Bernardino.
RONALD FOWLER will perform the approach design work associated with the
Vivienda__6r_[d`ge including the deometric alignment design, site drawings,
street design and utility relocation design.
Mr. Fowler is a registered Geologist in California and has had over 10 years
experience in the field of Civil Design. Mr. Fowler's broad range of ex-
perience includes the Civil Design of the street approaches to the Mountain
View Bridge at Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing in Loma Linda and the
Van Leuvan Bridge crossing the San Timoteo Creek in Loma Linda.
Mr. Fowler also functioned as Building Inspector and Assistant Contract
Administrator for the Bridge Projects described above.
3. LeRoy Crandall and Associates: This well-known and highly recognized Geo-
technical Engineering Firm specializes in Foundation Design and related Geo-
technical work. They were selected as Sub -Consultants due to their vast
experience in Foundation Design for Bridges and expertise in sophisticated
Geotechnical Engineering Projects.
The Consulting Firm together with its Sub -Consultants shall perform the work as
outlined under "A". The total fee for these Engineering Services shall be a Lump
Sum of $24, 000.00
Very truly yours,
kaj
PER RON, Vice -President
JOHNSON 6 NIELSEN ASSOCIATES
Consulting Structural Engineers
Encl. Brochure/as noted
E
Page #6
C R A ITEM (
AGENDA ITEM N0.
SUBJECT:
Siii
AFF REPC R T
COUNCIL ITEM ( x ) SET
Tree Removal Pr°gram
REQUIRED
��C iU„CING REQUIRED --" -'
I NU 'ATE: Jan. , 1984
12.250
Recently, we have been re trees from the quested by several Public parkway under (5) Property owners to remove
our tree removal
Our field investi and replacement
any reason to Cation indicates that Program.
believe that these these trees are not now, nor is there
any public facilities. trees will
in the future, cause damage to
This, then, becomes a
from the stand question of policy
Public eright-Of-wayPoint that an Y and Potentially dangerous precedent,
by the City. for any reason. City can request tree remova
The costs in this case are to bfrom a
e borne
The estimated cost in this case for
trees is an estimated additional removal
$2,700.00. $600.00 forts $2'100.00. To replace these
a possible total cost of
This decision by the Cit both the number of Y Council may have a
the costs to trees that we may treater effect in the future, on
the City for such e may lommit to remove out of
Other the City, and
cities allow removal of trees, which removals are
property owner only after: requested b
1• Review and a Y the
approval for such removal by the Parks Department.
2• Obtaining a
Permit from the City for such removal.
3. Payment for all requirement for costs bytherep ache p oaerty Owner for
such removal and possible
recommends that City
Staff cost to the property owner.
Council;
DOES NOT ACCEPT ITY FOR
ARE CAUSING DAMAGERESPONSIBILTo PUBLIC REMOVAL
AND/OR PRIVATEROPERTYY TREES LESS THEY
JK/lbk