02/09/1984ft-
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
TERRACE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FEBRUARY 9, 1984
22731 Grand Terrace Road 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
* Call to Order
* Invocation - Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center, Colton
* Pledge of Allegiance
* Roll Call
Staf f
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Recommendat'ons
Council Action
Approve
1. Approval of Minutes (1/12/84)
2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA020984
Approve
RECESS COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1. Civic Center Construction Briefing
2. Special Presentation of Funds to Colton Joint
Unified School District for Terrace Hills
Swimming Pool Renovation
RECONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. FY 1984-85 Capital Improvement Projects
JF
RECESS CITY COUNCIL
3. RFP-Economic Development Consultant (GTRFP84-3)
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL
3. Items to Add/Delete
_-
4. Approval of Minutes (1/12/84)(1/23/84)
Approve
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
expected to be routine & non -controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request
an item be removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
COUNCIL AGENDA
2/9/84
Page 2of3
A. Approval of Check Register No.020984
L� _ -L _
B. A RESOLL N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, OPPOSING ALL NEWS
MEDIA PROJECTION OR PREDICTION OF PRESI-
DENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS PRIOR TO THE
CLOSING OF POLLS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED
STATES.
StYRecommen ations
Approve
CITY Adopt
C. Community Development Block Grant Projects:
(1) Approve Budget Transfer of $1,482.42 Approve
from Acct. No. 10-4593-255 to Acct.
No. 10-4592-255 to Cover Cost Incurred
by Change Order No. 1;
(2) Authorize Allocation of $980.00 from Approve
6/30/84 Balance Forward to Acct. No. 10-
4592-255 to Cover Cost Incurred by
Change Order No. 2, leaving an Adjusted
Balance Forward of $554,175.00.
D. FY 83-84 TDA Article 8 Funds
(1) A RESO&TION'QF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, AUTHORIZING
THE RESUBMITTAL OF THE FY 1983-84
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS
(2) Authorize the Finance Officer to
Execute the Non -Transit & Financial
Reporting Forms
E. Authorize City Manager to Attend "March on
the Capitol" Seminar in Sacramento Feb. 28
F. Authorize Budget Transfer of $200 from Acct.
No. 10-4801-270 to Acct. No. 10-4370-255 to
Share Cost for Planning Staff Member to
Attend Planning Commissioners' Institute in
San Diego Feb. 29 - March 2
G. Authorize Bid Request for City Surplus
Property - Utility Poles
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
A. Planning Commission
B. Parks & Recreation Committee
C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
Approve
Approve
Council Action
COUNCIL AGENDA %0 Sthe
2/9/84 Recommendations
Page 3 of 3
Council Action
D. Crime Prevention Committee
E. Emergency Operations Committee
F. Police Chief
G. Fire Chief
H. City Engineer
I. City Attorney
J. City Manager
K. City Council
18. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Wilden Pump & Engineering Co. Appeal
19. NEW BUSINESS
A. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Approve 1st Read -
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, ADOPTING THE GRAND ing & Set Public
TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE. Hearing & 2nd
Reading for 2/23
1ADJOURN
THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE
(HELD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1984, AT 5:30 P.M
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 2/23/84 MEETING MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BY 12:00 NOON ON 2/15/84.
n
4NDING CRA APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 12, 1984
FE B 9 1984
CRA AG.E 'DA ITEM NO.
The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,
was held in the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on January 12, 1984, at 5:37 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Chairman
Jim Rigley, Vice Chairman
Tony Petta
Barbara Pfennighausen
Seth Armstead, Executive Director
Ed Clark, Treasurer
George McFarlin (Brown & Nazarek), Attorney
Myrna Erway, Secretary
ABSENT: Roy W. Nix
MINUTES - (12-14-83)
CRA-84-07 Motion by Mrs. Pfennighausen, Second by Mr. Rigley, ALL AYES by all
present to approve the Minutes of December 14, 1983 as presented.
CHECK REGISTERS - (Special No. CRA122983) (CRA011284)
CRA-84-08 Motion by Mr. Petta, Second by Chairman Grant, ALL AYES by all present
to approve Special Check Register No. CRA122983 as presented.
CRA-84-09 Motion by Mr. Rigley, Second by Mr. Petta, ALL AYES by all present to
approve Check Register No. CRA011284 as presented.
1981 MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS EXPIRATION
Attorney McFarlin advised that the terms of the 1981 Mortgage Revenue
Bond Issue, which expires March 1, 1984, provided for a mortgage
period of 34 months during which loans could be originated; prior to
expiration, the Agency must determine, through discussion with the
developers, whether or not the bonds should be extended for a 12-month
period. Security Pacific Bank has inquired whether the program will
be extended -or if the bonds will be called; they will be notified of
the final decision on this matter by January 23, once the 1984 Series
A Residential Mortgage Bond Issue has been finalized, which will still
allow sufficient time to call the bonds; the economic environment does
not appear to make extension feasible.
Page 1 -
CRA - 1/12/84
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
FEB 9 1984
PENDING GRA APOIRGVAI,
CRA AGEi,lDA ITEM NO.
FEB. 9, 1984 CHECK REGISTER NO. CRAO2O984
CHECK
NO. OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF FEB. 9, 1984
(1) P1344 BROWN & NAZAREK
*(2) P1345 MUNICIPAL SERVICES INC.
11
LEGAL SERVICES FOR NOVEMBER 1983
REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
FINAL PAYMENT $1,000.00
TOTAL: $1,394.45
394.45
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN
AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA.
EDWARD R. CLA�R'K�
TREASURER
* CHECK RELEASED PRIOR TO CHECK REGISTER APPROVAL
ff
�5410 AN-, KLFUK I e ;d,a<, ,
CRAITEM (X)
AGENDA ITEM NO.
COUNCIL ITEM (XX)
MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1984
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Staff has analyzed the revenues available and the capital improvement roll-over
projects from FY 83-84 and finds that this program has a deficit of approximately
$202,000. If all the projects (A list, Enclosure 3) were to be completed at their
estimated cost as previously approved by the Council, we would end up with a
deficit of $202,000.
The Council may recall that a list of projects were considered and approved during
the capital improvement phase of the Budget process in 1983-84, but were not on the
funded list for 1983-84 Budget. Some of these projects are:
(1) The Vivienda Bridge $109,000
(2) Storm Drains (I215/Michigan) $800,000
(3) Air conditioning classrooms at various schools $428,000
The staff strongly recommends that the Council ,� consider approving a deficit
budget. The staff recommends that at least $20FLUOO reserve be set aside for
unforeseen projects and/or possible matching funds for federal and/or state
projects.
The following are some alternatives that can be considered by the Council to solve
The $202,000 capital improvement deficit problem:
1. That the funding for storm drains be reduced from $730,000 to $330,000 making
$400,000 available. This would result in a $200,000 reserve available for
unforeseen projects etc.
2. The community center parking lot be increased from $37,000 to $44,000 as it is
underestimated.
3. The Mt. Vernon/Grand Terrace Road mini -park be deleted and programmed in the
future years when funds are available.
4. A utility tax of 10% be placed on all utilities including gas, electricity,
telephones and sewers. Recent legislation makes this avenue available to
general law cities that has previously been available to charter cities.
5. Apply the Mello -Roos bill to raise taxes to pay for fire and police protection.
6. Reduce funding even further on the storm drains to allow for maximum amount of
seed money to purchase options on land in Area B. It takes money to make
money.
7
Staff Report --SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Page 2
February 9, 1984
Staff recommends that the Council:
A. SCHEDULE A WORK SESSION FOR THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 13 TO CONSIDER THE ABOVE
ALTERNATIVES AND FOR GIVING STAFF GUIDANCE.
EC: SA: 10
Encs. 1. Summary of Revenues/Expenditures
2. Analysis of Revenues/Expenditures
3. "A" List of Projects Approved by Council
4. Projects Considered by Council/Staff But Not Approved
11
SUMMARY OF REVENUES / E)PENDITURES
FIVE YEAR PROJECTION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE
FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (CITY/CRA)
F YFAR I'RnJFCTInM
ENCLOSURE i
2/ 2/84
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
FUND TITLE
ESTIMATED
1983-1984
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1968-1989
ESTIMATED
COSTS
84/ 85- 88/ &
PALANCE FORWARD PRIOR YEAR
444,113
470,894
CRA FUNDS AVAILABLE
455,779
395,838
376,709
391,085
393,099
408,652
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS
372,464
353,158
152,850
158,687
165,019
179,350
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE
1,272,356
1,219,890
TOTAL EXPENDED
< 801,462>
<1,389,770>
PALANCE FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR
470,894
< 169,880>
11
ANALYSIS OF REVENUES / EWENDITURES ENCLOSURE 2
FIVE YEAR PROJECTION OF FUNDS AVAILABLE
FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (CITY/CRA)
2/ 2/84
r----- 5 YEAR PROJECTION- -- - -- - _�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
FUND TITLE
ESTIMATED
1983-1984
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
ESTIMATED
COSTS
84/ 85- 88/ 8?
REVENUES:
CRA REVENUES:
Secured Tax - Original
64,179
68,994
74,169
79,731
85,711
92,139
400,744
Secured Tax - Revised
215,244
220,922
237,491
255,303
274,451
295,035
1,283,202
Unsecured Tax
4,200
5,000
5,375
5,778
6, 21 1
6,677
0,041
Secured Tax - Prior Year
4,210
5,000
5,375
5,778
6,211
6,677
29, 041
Project Area (County)
181,051
142,655
142,855
142,855
142,855
142,855
714,275
Investment Earnings
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
55,000
Mortgage Bonds 1/2 of 1%
25,000
12,500
12,500
12,500
-0-
-0-
37,500
508,884
470,271
487,765
511,945
525,439
553,383
2,548,803
City Loan
400,000
800,800
924,200
1,052,700
1,197,400
1,360,900
5,336,000
CRA Operational Expense
<395,538>
<433,250>
<588,774>
<722,242>
<873,223>
<1,043,525>
0,661,010
Civic Center COP
-0-
<382,000>
<382,000>
<382,000>
<382,000>
<362,000>
<i,910,000>
Low Income Housing
<57,567>
<59,983>
<64,482>
<69,318>
<74,517>
<80,106>
<348,406>
TOTAL CRA FUNDS AVAILABLE
455,779
395,838
376,709
391,085
393,099
408,652
1,965,383
=ssssssassasasss=====sssss
aszs=sssss
aa.sa:zsa
sszaassaa
sssssaszs
ss::ssaaaa
==saunas==
ssssuss=s=s
RESTRICTED FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Capital Imprv. Streets
58,899
42,900
47,190
51,909
57,100
62,810
261,909
Capital Imprv. Storm Drns.
37,846
19,500
21,450
23,595
25,955
28,550
119,050
Gas Tax
70,220
28,360
26,310
24,394
22,302
20,023
121,369
TDA
173,594
51,398
57,900
58,789
59,662
67,967
295,716
FAU
-0-
180,000
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
1800000
CD8G
31,905
31,000
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
31,000
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS
372,464
353,158
152,850
158,687
165,019
179,350
1,009,064
ass::ss=ssssss=s=s:=sus
sasssass:
asaas:ss
zaazsszaa
s:sss=asa
:a=ss=sas
s:::sass■
ssssassssas
a
"A" LIST OF PROJECTS APPROVED BY COUNCIL ENCLOSURE 3
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, LISTED BY PRIORITY (CITY/CRA)
2/2/84
�--- 5 YEAR PROJECTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FUND TITLE
PROJECT
ESTIMATED
COSTS
CURRENT YEAR
1983-84
ESTIMATED to 6/30/84
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
TOTAL
PLANNED
84/85 -
88/ 89
E FENDED
BALANCE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
C1 ULATIVE
CITY FUNDS
Community Center Restrooms
(COBG)
17,950
17,950
-D-
-0-
Community Center Parking Lot
(CDBG)
39,000
2,278
36,722
36,722
36,722
36,722
Drainage Gage Canal(Gen'l Fd)
5,350
5,350
-0-
-0-
VIvlenda Bridge Historical
Appraisal (Gen') Fund)
1,000
1,000
-0-
-0-
Blue Mt. Erosion (Gen'I Fund)
3,175
903
2,272
-0-
Architect Barrier Removal
(Street Fund)
110,180
60,180
-0-
10,000
46,722
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
50,000
Fence, Parton Rd, Mt. Vernon/
Arliss (Street Fund)
1,500
1,500
-0-
-0-
Recons.Barton N/E City Limits
(Gas Tax, TDA, FAU Funds)
654,865
87,317
567,548
567,548
614,270
567,548
Pico St Widening/Grading
Pico/Orlole (TDA Funds)
12,392
12,392
-0-
-0-
N
E
K
"A" LIST OF PROJECTS APPROVED BY COUNCIL
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, LISTED BY PRIORITY (CITY/CRA)
F---- 5 YEAR PROJECTION-
ENCLOSURE 3
2/2/84
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
1983-84
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
PLANNED
FUND TITLE
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED to 6/ 30/84
84/85 -
COSTS
88/ 89
E)FENDED
BALANCE
PLANNED
C(lriMULATIVE
PLANNED
CINAMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
CITY FUNDS (con'd)
Resurface DeBerry, Mt.V-Mich.
G.T. Road (TDA Funds)
90,000
81,000
9,000
-0-
Signal LaCrosse/Barton Rd
(TDA Funds)
69,900
69,900
-0-
-0-
TOTAL CITY PROJECTS EITHER
COMPLETED/UNDER CONSTRUCTION/
APPROVED BY COUNCIL
1,005,312
339,770
615,542
614,270
614,270
654,270
sssssssszsasssssasssassssasas
ssassssazaz
xsasxzszs:
zss::a:zsss
xasaazsxax
zazxsxssas:
xrnxxxsxx
=axsazxxsxa
a:asssszss
sssszsszzzs
ssazazszs:
zsassszsssz
as:assszss
:szsa:sass:
sz:s:sszsas
CRA FUNDS
Fire Station
757,290
234,719
-0-
-0-
Motorcross
8,450
83
8,367
-0-
Review/RevIsIon City General
Plan - Traffic Flow Plan
47,068
47,068
-0-
-0-
Masterpian Storm Drains; Eng.
13,025
13,025
-0-
-0-
Barton/Mt.V Beautification
74,847
74,847
-0-
-0-
"A" LIST OF PROJECTS APPROVED BY COUNCIL ENCLOSURE 3
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, LISTED BY PRIORITY (CITY/CRA)
2/ 2/ 84
F- 5 YEAR PROJECTIO
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FUND TITLE
PROJECT
ESTIMATED
COSTS
CURRENT YEAR
1983-84
ESTIMATED to 6/30/84
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
TOTAL
PLANNED
84/85 -
8 8/ 89
E FENDED
BALANCE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
CRA FUNDS (con'd)
Automatic Sprinkler System
20,000
20,000
-0-
-0-
Reconstruct Drainage Plco/M.V
10,000
8,000
2,000
-0-
Swimming Pool
15,000
15,000
-0-
-0-
Pico Storm Drains-1215/Mich
750,000
20,000
730,000
730,000
730,000
730,000
Step Planting - Jr.High d Par
7,700
7,700
-0-
-0-
Stamperete/Restrms at Park
4,750
4,750
-0-
-0-
Mt V/ G.T. Rd Mini Park
50,000
500
45,500
45,500
775,500
45,500
Iley Reconstruction
34,000
34,000
-0-
-0-
TOTAL CRA PROJECTS EITHER
COMPLETED/UNDER CONSTRUCTION/
APPROVED BY AGENCY
1,774,230
461,692
785,867
775,500
775,500
775,500
:sssssssassszssssssssssssssss
sssssssssss
sss:azssss
sssssasssss
saszss:zss
zssaszssa:a
zsasaazaza
s:aaaazzsas
aass:as:ss
sss::ssssz
aazsszssas
zssssssszss
zsseszsazs
sssssss:ass
sssss:ssssz
TOTAL CITY d CRA PROJECTS
COMPLETED/UNDER CONSTRUCTION/
APPROVED BY COUNCIL/AGENCY
2,779,542
801,462
1,401,409
1,389,770
1,389,370
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
1,429,770
il
0
PROJECTS CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL/STAFF BUT NOT APPROVED
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, LISTED BY PRIORITY (CITY/CRA)
r---- 5 YEAR PROJECTI
ENCLOSURE 4
2/2/84
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FUND TITLE
PROJECT
ESTIMATED
COSTS
CURRENT YEAR
1983-84
ESTIMATED to 6/30/84
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
TOTAL
PLANNED
84/85 -
88/89
E)(PENDED
BALANCE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
I. Vlvlenda Bridge Reptacmnt
500,000
109,000
884,500
2. Option - Purchase Land to
Area B
500,000
500,000
1,384,500
3. Storm Drains/Mich-Orlole
800,000
800,000
2,184,500
4. Barton Rd Widening
Canal to Vivlenda
446,000
5. Air Condition Classrooms/
Various Schools (CRA)
428,000
428,000
2,612,500
6. Lighting Ftbali/Soc Field
Terrace Hills Pk (CRA)
85,000
7. Beautification two median
strips La Cadena Dr (CRA)
25,000
8. Mich Av Widening (Street)
395,000
9. Wilderness Park (CRA)
35,000
10. Landscape Fwy banks (CRA)
100,000
PROJECTS CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL/STAFF BUT NOT APPROVED
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, LISTED BY PRIORITY (CITY/CRA)
F----- 5 YEAR PROJECTION
ENCLOSURE 4
2/2/84
CURRENT YEAR
TOTAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
1983-84
1984-1985
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
PLANNED
FUND TITLE
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED to 6/30/84
84/85 -
COSTS
8 8/ 89
E)FENDED
BALANCE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
PLANNED
CUMMULATIVE
. Community Svc. Ctr. (CRA)
400,000
12. Addition Ball Diamonds
(CRA)
365,000
13. Signal installation
Mt. Vernon -South of
Barton (DeBerry) (CRA)
122,500
14. Additional Bus Stops
(CRA)
12,000
15. Low Interest Housing
Rehab Program (CRA)
400,000
16. Correct Northend of
Mt. Vernon -prevent
earthsllde (CRA)
500*000
TOTAL
2,612,500
2,612,500
4?44) --
SZAFF REPC4RT C
C R A ITEM ( X) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: 2-9-84
AGENDA ITEM NO. CRA-3
SUBJECT: RFP Letter - Economic Development Consultant (GRFRP 84-3)
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX (at this time)
Attached is the revised RFP letter which incorporates the
changes requested by Council at the meeting of January 26, 1984.
This letter was furnished to all Council Members on January 30
for review and comments, so that any further changes could be
made prior to submittal for Council consideration at the
meeting of February 9, 1984.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS
FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT, USING THE ATTACHED LETTER.
SAA:me
M
►-J
February 10, 1984
Gentlemen:
Re: GTRFP #84-03
We invite you to submit a proposal to act as the staff extension for the
Executive Director/City Manager to carry out redevelopment planning which
will enhance economic development and attract commercial development to
the City of Grand Terrace.
The services required would include establishing a strategy and a develop-
ment plan maintaining a presence in developer forums, retail trade meetings
and other areas affording an opportunity to sell Grand Terrace as a viable
commercial market location. The firm selected for the foregoing must
have the proven ability to plan and carry out development solicitations
and developer negotiations. The objective to come from these services
(strategy and planning) must be to see that the short and long term
Commercial/Residential Industrial growth and planning is such that the
City will enjoy a greatly increased source of stable revenue.
The firm selected will be expected to meet with representatives from
the Chamber of Commerce, the Agency Members and Staff during the conduct
of this contract, for guidance and direction on the objectives to be
met for development activities.
M
F]
February 10, 1984
Page 2
Grand Terrace is a progressive, pure contract city of 10,000 population
encompassing 3.7 square miles. The entire City is approved as a
redevelopment area; therefore, the Agency realizes tax increment from any
new improvements made within the City.
Your proposal should include:
1. Qualifications in redevelopment (a strategy and plan) and means of
financing.
2. Experience in redevelopment planning and financing and key firm
members who will be assigned to this project.
3. Firms expertise and knowledge in redevelopment agency planning and
compliance.
4. Current redevelopment contracts in Southern California.
5. Availability on day-to-day basis for consultation.
6. Types and when reports/plans will be submitted.
7. A schedule of time and costs to accomplish the objective.
8. The cost rate of personnel.
9. Methods of selecting development firms.
10. Any other aspects that you believe are pertinent to the objective.
A meeting will be held with the Executive Director/City Manager and other
members of his staff at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 21, 1984 in
Building No. 4, City Conference Room, to give you the opportunity to
discuss the Agency's/City's operation and ask any questions you may have.
Those firms interested will then submit 12 copies of their proposal to be
received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 7, 1984. Staff
recommendations will be submitted to the Agency Directors/City Council for
approval on Thursday, March 22, 1984.
The proposed fee should be a fixed amount and hourly rates for additional
work approved by the Agency.
M
n
February 10, 1984
Page 3
The City has had several studies conducted previously. The reports from
those studies are available in the City Clerk's Office which will provide
information and assistance in preparing your proposal and to carry out
the contract objectives. The following documents will be available
for review Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and copies
can be provided, if requested, at a cost of 10� per page:
(1) Redevelopment Implementation Strategy;
(2) General Plan Update Program;
(3) Nonresidential Development Market Evaluation; and
(4) Feasibility Study Improved Freeway Access (Expanded Circulation).
Sincerely,
Seth Armstead
Executive Director/City Manager
EC: SA: 10
PENDING CITY,.
490 COUNCIL APPROQt FEB 9 1984
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CCUNICIL AGEINDA ITEM i !1
COUNCIL MINUTES //
REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 12, 1984
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to
order at the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on January 12, 1984, at 5:55 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor
Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tony Petta, Councilman
Roy W. Nix, Councilman (Arrived 6:25 p.m.)
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman
Seth Armstead, City Manager
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Myrna Erway, City Clerk
ABSENT: None
The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Petta, followed by the Pledge
of Allegiance, led by Councilwoman Pfennighausen.
MINUTES - (12-14-84)
CC-84-07 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES
by all present to approve the Minutes of December 14, 1984 as
presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item 3C - Resolution to control utility rates - was removed for
discussion.
CC-84-08 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Councilman Rigley, ALL AYES by
all present to approve the following Consent Calendar Items:
A. Approval of Special Check Register No. 122983;
B. Approval of Check Register No. 011284; and
D. Approve Budget Transfer of $28.41 from Line Item No. 10-4120-249 to
18-4908-255 for street sweeping signs.
RESOLUTION URGING CONTROL OF UTILITY RATES
Sue Noreen, Area Manager, So. California Edison Company, requested
deferring action on this resolution to allow time for her to prepare
Page 1 -
1/12/84
LJ
and present a briefing explaining the complexities of the utility rate
process from her company's point of view. Council recommended
including the other utility companies in the briefing; Ms. Noreen will
invite the other companies to participate.
CC-84-09 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES
by all present to defer this matter for one month from this date to
allow contacts to be made and a presentation to be prepared.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
John Mathews, 11733 Eton Drive, requested and received permission to
take photographs during the meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The December 5, 1983 Minutes were provided to Council.
The Planning Director advised the 1984 Planning Commissioners
Institute will be held in San Diego February 29 - March 2; the
Planning Commission has requested that Staff use funds from their
budget to attend; indicated he would be willing to share the cost if
funds are insufficient; will present a proposal to Council.
CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE
Police Service Proposal - Administrative Assistant Coyle advised Mr.
Harold Larkin submitted a proposal for police services in August which
he reviewed and submitted to the Crime Prevention Committee for
review; Susan Crawford of that Committee did an in-depth study and
concluded the proposal would not be feasible; recommended rejecting
the proposal and notifying Mr. Larkin.
Mayor Grant stated the analysis prepared by Susan Crawford was very
professional and indicated she is very knowledgeable on this matter;
supports improvement of law enforcement services and cost
effectiveness and encourages proposals for all services; feels this
proposal does not meet the criteria and would be inferior to the
services presently received from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Department; indicated satisfaction with present services.
CC-84-10 Motion by Mayor Grant, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, ALL AYES
by all present to reject Mr. Larkin's proposal for police services and
to direct Staff to write a letter to Mr. Larkin thanking him for his
interest in the City.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
The Administrative Assistant advised the Committee submitted an
informational report to Council indicating a desire to attend seminars
sponsored by the State Office of Emergency Services, which are
Page 2 -
1/12/84
Ln
n
CITY/CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNICATION SUBCOMMITTEE
CC-84-11 Motion by Mayor Grant, Second by Councilman Nix, ALL AYES, to appoint
Councilwoman Pfennighausen and Councilman Rigley to serve on a
committee with the Chamber of Commerce to discuss a joint venture.
CITY FLAG
The Community Services Director advised a Staff Report was presented
summarizing previous Council action, listing the price breakdown for
alternatives on one-sided vs two-sided flags, the quantities to be
ordered to realize a price reduction, and the Council decisions
requested.
Mr. Konkler, the manufacturer, stated when the light shines through on
a two-sided flag, the imprint on one side shows through on the other
side; a silk-screen process is used; indicated the material to be used
is the same as that used for the San Bernardino City Flags, and has
been informed they last much longer than the State flags.
CC-84-12 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilman Rigley, to: (1) Approve
a two-sided City Flag with wrong -way reading; (2) Approve the purchase
of a total of 25 flags, the minimum number in order to receive a price
reduction from $375 to $319 per flag, with two flags to be indoor
flags with blue fringe on three sides, for an additional $46.54 each;
and (3) Approve the transfer of $8,552.16 from the 6/30/84 Balance
Forward to Line Item 10-4190-220, leaving a Balance Forward of
$559,882.84.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA,
RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 73 & AMENDING THE REGULATIONS FOR
COMPREHENSIVE LITTER CONTROL & MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC & PRIVATE
PROPERTY. (First Reading)
City Attorney Hopkins read the title of the Ordinance. The City
Manager stated the vehicle code provides that vehicles must be
covered, and the City's Ordinance No. 73 does not require that
vehicles be covered; as a result, a local citizen received a citation
for hauling rubbish that was not covered. The City Attorney stated
Staff has recommended that Council waive the citation; since the
individual was cited under State statute, the City cannot waive a
State statute.
Councilman Nix questioned who issued the citation and why the City's
ordinance is not being enforced; the decision was purposely made not
to have maximum coverage; does not favor changing the ordinance; feels
direction should be given to enforce the City's ordinance.
Mayor Grant stated he assumes this was done because the officer
recognizes the Vehicle Code takes precedence over the City's Ordinance
and State law prevails. The City Attorned advised Council cannot
waive what the Legislature has passed; this is the law on the State
Page 4 -
1/12/84
highways; you can make it more restrictive within the City, but you
cannot make it less restrictive than State law.
Mayor Grant opened the meeting to public participation.
Supporting Testimony
Ernie Zampese, 11963 Honey Hill Drive
because his load was tied down but wa
decision be made on the requirements
exactly what to do when hauling loads
, stated he received a citation
s not covered; requested that a
so that everyone will know
Bob Yeates, 12888 Fremontia, stated signs have been posted at all
entrances to the City for 6-8 months that all vehicles hauling refuse
must be covered; indicated litter has been reduced by 80% in Georgia
by requiring covered loads; favors changing the ordinance to require
covered loads. The meeting was closed to public participation, there
being no further testimony on this matter.
Councilman Petta stated Mr. Zampese was present at the meeting when
Council developed Ordinance No. 73 and made the determination not to
required covered loads; since he obeyed the City's Ordinance,
requested the City Attorney find a method to intercede; Council
requested that the City Attorney write a letter in behalf of Mr.
Zampese similar to one previously written in behalf of Mr. Rollins.
Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Petta, to
approve first reading of the ordinance, by title only, and to set
public hearing and second reading of the ordinance rescinding
Ordinance No. 73 and amending the rules and regulations for
comprehensive litter control and maintenance of public and private
property relative to the requirement to cover and secure loose
materials being transported.
Councilman Petta voiced concurrence with Councilman Nix's reference to
the position Council previously took on this matter, but supports
amending the ordinance, based on the City Attorney's advice.
Councilman Nix stated the portion of the vehicle code provided applies
to rubbish vehicles only ; does not see where any data has been
provided showing any ambiguities.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated the City's ordinance should not be
in violation of State law; also does not want to place the law
enforcement officers in a guesswork position relative to what to
enforce and according to whom; withdrew the Motion, with Councilman
Petta concurring, since the data is not available which Councilman Nix
feels is necessary; requested that the Vehicle Code data be provided
prior to taking further action on this matter.
Recess was called at 7:20 p.m. and reconvened at 7:42 p.m. with all
members present.
Page 5 -
1/12/84
M
APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF USE IN C-2/CPD ZONE
Planning Director Kicak stated Council was provided with a Staff
Report for this meeting and was also provided a letter from the
appellant, Mr. Zampese, a Planning Commission Staff Report dated
December 5, 1983, a letter dated November 4, 1983 from John Blick,
Sto-A-Way, Inc., and the December 5, 1983 Planning Commission Minutes.
Stated a request was received to allow construction of mini -warehouses
in an area zoned C-2/CPD; since the zoning code doesn't specifically
address this issue, conducted a survey of a number of cities, and
based on that survey, recommended that mini -warehouses not be
permitted in this zone. The Planning Commission determined that such
a use would be permitted. Mr. Zampese has filed an appeal on this
matter, requesting that the determination made by the Planning
Commission be overturned. Recommended that Council render a
determination following the public hearing.
Mayor Grant stated Council received material from Sto-A-Way. Opened
Public Hearin4 on the matter.
Supporting Testimony to Grant Appeal
Ernie Zampese, 11963 Honey Hill Drive, stated his letter dated
December 9, 1983 states his reasons for opposing, feeling it would be
detrimental to allow mini -warehouses in that area. would lower the
other property values in that area, and is not an allowable use for
that area as zoned.
Opposing Testimony to Grant Appeal
Jerry Mathews, 21971 DeBerry, one of the owners of U-Stor, voiced
support of mini -warehouses in that area, stating they will not
substantially increase traffic flow, and will bring bring more
commercial business into the area; feels the growth potential is good
for that type of business.
Dennis Cardoza, representing the property owners, felt this would be
an asset to the City since the subject property is a key visibility
site, would improve the looks of the property, would improve the tax
base, and would draw more commercial development; the property owners
have insufficient capital to develop the property as they would like
to have it developed, so Sto-A-Way has been brought in as a partner;
this firm is willing to construct mini -warehouses, which will provide
revenue to complete development, and is willing to remove them at the
end of a five-year period or sooner. Councilwoman Pfennighausen
questioned if the developers would be extending Commercial Drive to
DeBerry and installing the improvements on their property frontage.
Mr. Cardoza stated if the Planning Commission Determination remains,
he will still have to submit a conditional use permit and a site plan
before the property can be developed; feels the Planning Commission
Page 6 -
1/12/84
will require the street to be constructed on the frontage of the
mini -warehouses and to be continued when the remainder of the site is
developed.
Councilman Rigley questioned if the subject property consists of three
separate parcels; Mr. Cardoza stated a lot line adjustment will be
required; the warehouses will use two of the three lots; the street
would cut the third lot into two sections.
Rebuttal Testimony
Ernie Zampese questioned why the developers don't start the commercial
development now rather than constructing the mini -warehouses, then
tearing them down in five years and starting all over again; felt
there are many questions, including the zoning; felt allowing this
will not be beneficial.
Dennis Cardoza stated the mini -warehouses would create the cash flow
needed to construct the required improvements, and would then be
removed to continue the commercial development; stated all nine acres
cannot be developed at this time.
Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing.
Councilman Petta declared a potential conflict of interest on this
matter, since he is considering a similar development on his property,
and withdrew from discussion and voting on this matter. City Manager
Armstead also declared a potential conflict of interest and withdrew
from discussion on this matter.
Councilman Nix voiced concurrence with the intent of the appeal in
terms of protecting the City's best future interests and promoting the
most desirable type of development; however, supports the Planning
Commission determination, based on the data and rationale presented by
the developer and due to the amount of land dedicated in that area.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen voiced support of the Planning Commission
determination, feeling it will monetarily benefit the City in an
interim period; felt the proposed development is attractive and could
attract other commercial developers.
City Attorney Hopkins advised the Planning Commission has made the
determination that the zoning code allows mini -warehouses with a
conditional use permit in a C-2/CPD Zone; Council at this time is to
hear testimony relative to the appeal and determine whether or not it
concurs with the Planning Commission Determination; advised Council
should not discuss the merits of the proposed development.
Councilman Rigley stated Council's intent is to attract commercial
development into that area; feels the mini -warehouses will not
generate much revenue; although the City Attorney has clarified the
issue, all discussion held thus far is whether or not to allow
Page 7 -
1/12/84
n
mini -warehouses; wants to ask questions to determine whether or not
the Planning Commission made a good decision.
The City Attorney stated whether or not a conditional use permit will
be granted must still be considered by the Planning Commission;
cautioned that discussion at this time could affect judgment and
impartiality in the event this matter were to be appealed to Council
at a later date.
Councilman Rigley questioned the acreage to be used for the
mini -warehouses - was advised 2.75 acres will be used; questioned if a
conditional use permit can be granted legally with a specific
condition that the warehouses are to be removed in five years or
sooner, and if it can be enforced legally. Attorney Hopkins advised a
conditional use permit can be for a time certain and can expire in a
specified period of time. Councilman Rigley indicated support of the
appeal, concurring with economic development but concerned this
proposed development could conflict with what he visualizes for
planned development.
Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to
deny the appeal of the Planning Commission Determination of Use in
C-2/CPD Zone. Councilman Nix stated he feels the Planning Commission
Determination is appropriate, due to the amount of property in the
C-2/CPD designation, the need for economic development in the City,
and since approval of granting a conditional use permit is required in
each case. The Motion failed, with AYES by Councilman Nix and
Councilwoman Pfennighausen, NOES by Mayor Grant and Councilman Rigley,
and Councilman Petta abstaining.
Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Mayor Grant to approve the appeal
failed 1-3, with Mayor Grant voting AYE and Councilman Petta
abstaining.
Attorney Hopkins advised the Appeal fails, since the appellant did not
receive a favorable vote; therefore, the interpretation of the
Planning Commission Determination stands within the C-2/CPD Zone;
mini -warehouses are allowed, subject to a conditional use permit.
APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION ON SA 83-7 - WILDEN PUMP
Planning Director Kicak advised the Planning Commission conducted a
site and architectural review of Wilden Pump's proposed addition to a
warehouse on the south side of Van Buren, Westerly of Michigan on
December 5, 1983; Staff recommended certain conditions of approval in
a Staff Report; this report and the minutes of that meeting have been
provided to Council; as a result of public testimony, the Planning
Commission added additional conditions, as shown in Motion No. PCM
83-69, to construct a block wall and to plant Italian Cypress Trees.
Wilden Pump & Engineering Company has appealed the Planning Commission
Determination; understands the appeal is based on the additional
conditions as specified by the Planning Commission.
Page 8 -
1/12/84
n
n
Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing on the Appeal.
Testimony Supporting the Appeal
Allen Tuck, Vice -President, Wilden Pump & Engineering Company, 22069
Van Buren, stated he is appealing portions of the additional
conditions imposed by the Planning Commission December 5, 1983
relating to constructing a six-foot wall along the 1,100 foot
perimeter of the company's property and supplying certain landscaping
and trees to the adjacent residents. Concurred with the requirement
to construct a six-foot wall in the new construction area, but opposed
additional walls where there is no new construction and the
requirement to provide Italian Cypress Trees in those areas where the
property is adjacent to existing construction.
Mr. Tuck felt there are other solutions to the problems cited which
would be more fair and equitable to the company which would also
resolve the residents' concerns. Indicated the problem of visual
pollution will be resolved when the new warehouse is constructed,
since it will provide internal storage. Distributed copies of a
policy letter which was prepared in response to the problems cited.
Feels the complaint regarding paint fumes was based on activities
prior to November, 1982 and the problem resolved when the new painting
system was installed. Stated discussions with the residents revealed
the complaint about noise related to loud talking and radios in the
assembly areas; action has been taken to resolve that matter.
Mr. Tuck stated the conditions imposed would cost approximately
$30,000 - $40,000, which is 5-6% of the project cost; noted the
importance of his company's ability to remain competitive and the
local revenue the company produces.
Mr. Tuck presented alternative proposals to the conditions imposed;
concurred with constructing a six-foot wall in the new construction
area; felt the Planning Commission conditions did not adequately
identify the six-foot wall; felt it would be reasonable to construct a
six-foot wall from the level of the Martinez property. In the area of
old construction, the wall is going from a recessed driveway; if a
six-foot wall is required from the level of the adjoining property,
it would require a 13-foot masonry wall, costing in excess of $100,000
for the entire perimeter. In the area of new construction, wants the
wall defined from a certain point.
Feels the Planning Commission condition to construct a wall along the
entire south side is inappropriate; recommended stopping at the end of
the new construction, feeling this will block the view from the Wagner
property, with the adjacent property being vacant. Indicated a
willingness to meet the requirements for trees or landscaping with
respect to the Wagner property only; felt it was questionable whether
the Burgets, Martinez' and Stewarts would desire cypress trees, in
view of their present landscaping.
Relative to the area on the north, feels inappropriate that this area
be considered, since it doesn't involve any new construction. Stated
Page 9 -
1/12/84
there is a 12-foot driveway and a solid decorative masonry wall which
is well -maintained. Stated the new construction will provide, in
effect, a solid wall enclosed by a roof, providing an aesthetic
appearance similar to the existing east area. Requested that Council
consider what he feels are reasonable and equitable alternatives.
Testimony Opposing the Appeal
Linda Burget, 12570 Michigan, felt the six-foot wall should be built
on her side of the property rather than the company's side, since that
property is lower; wants drainage.
Phil Wagner, 12610 Sanburg Way, stated the zoning has been changed to
light industrial which requires a six-foot wall; complained of noise
from trucks and traffic at night, tractors dozing the field at 10:00
p.m., and spotlights; felt the requirement for trees is appropriate.
Jess Martinez, 12580 Michigan, showed photographs and stated his
property has been flooded every year since 1978; backyard has a chain
link fence; concerned a solid wall will increase problems if there is
no allowance for proper drainage. Councilman Rigley questioned if the
flooding was due to the water not draining from his property onto
Wilden's property. Mr. Martinez stated water from higher levels
drains down their driveways; sufficient drainage has not been provided
for the water run-off due to construction above his property.
Rebuttal Testimony
Allen Tuck, relative to Mrs. Burget's concerns, stated the company's
driveway will be substantially recessed; twelve feet away will be a
solid six-foot wall attractively painted with no openings which will
contain noise more effectively than a six-foot wall. Recommended a
retaining wall for the easterly area, since the Burget, Martinez and
Stewart properties already have six-foot fences and mature
landscaping. Relative to Mr. Wagner's concerns, concurred with
constructing a six-foot wall on the south side; recommended providing
Mr. Wagner with the cypress trees to plant on his own property;
indicated he was unaware of the noise problems cited, and had he been
notified would have resolved the problems. Relative to Mr. Martinez'
concerns for flooding, noted since they are also victims, with their
property being even lower, this is not Wilden's problem and does not
relate to this issue; would join Mr. Martinez in imploring Council to
correct the problem by installing an adequate drainage system on the
north side of Michigan that will join with the adequate 36-inch pipe
which his firm installed in anticipation of this problem.
Mr. Martinez questioned what provisions will be made for drainage if
the wall is built.
Mrs. Burget requested clarification - stated contradicting statements
have been made relative to whether the six-foot fence would be on her
side or Wilden's. Indicated she wants the fence built on her side and
Page 10 -
1/12/84
wants to remove her wood fence if they build a six-foot wall on her
side. Council indicated Mr. Tuck had indicated this matter was not
clearly defined by the Planning Commission. Planning Director Kicak
stated it is his understanding the purpose of the wall as required by
the Planning Commission is for screening purposes to the adjacent
properties; would interpret that to mean a six-foot high wall measured
from the point on the properties on Michigan.
Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing.
Attorney Hopkins reviewed the appeal which concerns three issues, and
recommended upholding or denying the three issues separately: (1) not
requiring the wall to be six feet above the high property line; (2)
requiring the wall in the new construction area only, rather then
around the entire property; (3) relative to requiring cypress trees be
planted, allow the appellant to provide the trees to the property
owners to plant on their property.
CC-84-13 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, ALL
AYES, to support the appeal relative to not requiring the block wall
six feet high on the entire dimension of the south side of the
appellant's property; however, to require construction of a six-foot
garden wall from the westerly side of the Wagner property easterly
along the southerly property line.
Council discussed whether the block wall on the southerly border
should be six feet above the level of the property owners' property or
from the level of the Wilden property. Councilwoman Pfennighausen
felt if a six-foot wall was constructed across the four properties,
it would act as a dam, even if drainage holes were provided; is aware
it would be more attractive, but feels a 4-5 foot retaining wall, with
the property owners retaining their present fences, would be better
for the property owners. Wilden Pump is proposing lowering the
driveway five feet and building a retaining wall, thereby allowing the
water to flow over that wall.
City Engineer Kicak stated that until a proper drainage system is
installed to intercept the water from Michigan and Pico, the drainage
problems will continue, whether or not there is a wall; felt the wall
will compound the problem. Indicated most of the storm drain system
is designed, with $700,000 presently available for construction.
Mayor Grant left the meeting at 9:48 and returned at 9:51 p.m.
Mr. Tuck stated his firm would be willing to build a properly -designed
retaining wall to allow drainage from the backyards, and could build a
six-foot block wall from the Burget's side of the property if they
desired, but felt it would be a mistake.
Attorney Hopkins advised Council cannot set new conditions as is being
requested by Mr. Tuck; according to the Planning Director, the present
condition is a retaining wall and six feet above that a fence; if
Page 11 -
1/12/84
u
Council wants the condition changed, the appeal should be granted,
thereby sending it back to the Planning Commission to be revised.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned the equity and legality of
imposing conditions in areas previously developed versus new
construction; Attorney Hopkins stated he feels it could legally be
enforced; didn't address the equity.
Recess was called at 10:07 and reconvened at 10:22, with all members
present.
Councilman Rigley felt a block wall six feet above the property
owners' level would be detrimental to those properties, causing
flooding; Wilden Pump has proposed building a retaining wall there,
indicating the new building will provide a sound barrier; questioned
if the property owners, in view of the adverse situation, would want
the six-foot block wall; questioned and received confirmation they
would be satisfied with a five-foot retaining wall on the back of
their property.
Councilman Nix indicated the appeal deals with the Planning Commission
setting a condition requiring a six-foot wall along the entire
easterly side; stated the Planning Commission Minutes dealt to a
greater extent with the fencing which is already between Wilden Pump,
a firm which has been there many years, and the property owners on
Michigan, than it does with the new construction; feels it would be
punitive to require Wilden Pump to go back and build a six-foot wall
up to Van Buren, and it doesn't make sense to have a six foot fence
requirement that starts halfway back that goes six feet up on some
properties and on some it doesn't; felt this is adverse to Council's
desire to encourage commercial development.
The Planning Director was questioned and confirmed that a six-foot
block wall is required by the zoning code to separate light industrial
property from residential; Councilwoman Pfennighausen felt that when
circumstances occur where a zoning code requirement is found to be
both punitive, as well as detrimental to those whose benefits it was
designed to serve, it should be set aside.
CC-84-14 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen,
ALL AYES, that the appeal of Wilden Pump & Engineering Company to
eliminate the requirement of a six-foot garden wall along the easterly
border be approved; that in the area of new construction on the
easterly side, the developer is to construct a retaining wall as
necessary; no garden wall shall be required.
CC-84-15 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, that
the appeal regarding the cypress trees be denied; however, if the
construction of the six-foot wall, as proposed by the developer, meets
with the approval of the adjacent property owners, then the cypress
trees would not have to be furnished to the individual property
owners.
Page 12 -
1/12/84
n
M
Attorney Hopkins clarified that the intent of the Motion is that the
requirement for the trees remains, except if the property owner is
willing to put the trees on his property, that is acceptable.
Following discussion and clarification, Motion No. CC-84-15 carried,
ALL AYES.
ADJOURN - The regular meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. The next
regular meeting will be held January 26, 1984 at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
C i ty Cptrk
APPROVED:
Mayor
Page 13 -
1/12/84
C1TY FEB 9 1984
folopEhp;NG vALCHE EGISTER NO. 020984
CIl. FPPRD
GRAND TERRACE 5A PAGENO. 1
COUNCIL. AGENDA IYEM I�
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-081 DATE 02/OQ/84
I:NER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED 0ATER,FINANCE
10-4190-238
20740
17.80
BOTTLED 4ATER,CO-M.SVCS.
10-4190-238
20741
13.30
BOTTLED NATER,C/M
10-4190-238
20742
13.50
11903
44.60
CALIF.SOCIETY/MUNICIPAL
CSfAFO SE!A.2/1-2/3/84 SET'10-4110-270
191,00
P390
191.00
CHECK VOID, NOT ATTENDING
CULTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRI
C/C MEET. 10/13 & 10/26/210-4110-242
122.50
PLAfgNI,vG MEET.10/3/83
10-4801-242
25.00
SQUARE DANCE 10/1/83
13-4430-242
60.00
P3911
207.50
CU%imUivITY REDEVELOPMENT AGE+'
LOAN 02 FY 19P3/84
10-4200-800
100000.00
P391C
100000.00
COPY LINE CORP.
COPIER PENT,1/14-2/14/84
10-4190-240
1602
524.70
1190'
524.70
nAWIEL'S LANDSCAPING SERVICE -
PARK MAINT. 1/64
13-4430-245
750.00
11905
750.00
DtFERRED C011PENSATIUM PLAN
DEF.CONIP. P/R END.1/13/8
10-2164-OUO
643.OU
UEF.CO-AP. P/R END.1/13/8110-2170-000
97.89
DEF.COI-+P. P/R END.1/13/8
10-4120-13Q
576.95
DEF.CM4P. P/R END.1/13/8
10-4125-139
384.62
UEF.0014P. P/R END.1/13/8110-4+40-139
546.43
DEF.001-IP. P/4 FND.1/13/9
1U-4160-139
231.95
DEF.COMP. P/R END.1/13/8,13-4430-139
185.35
DEF.CO!.iP. P/k END.1/13/8
21-4572-139
110.35
P3916
2776.54
ELIZA6ETH DUARTE
BOOK ON GOV.A000UNTING
10-4140-270
21.00
LOCAL MILFAGE,DUARTE
`
10-4140-271
.75
P3913
21.75
i
i
I
GRAND TERRACE
m
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO
84-061
DATE 02/09/84
" EH
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
4TH QUARTER DEPOSIT 1983
10-2162-000
261.55
4TH QUARTER DEPOSIT 1983
1U-2163-000
28.73
P3922
290.28 ,
FRITZ'S LAWNMOWER REPAIR
LAWN MOIgER,EDGER,FIRE
13-4430-245
1031
514.10
11906
514.10
STATION
ALEXANDER GRANT & COMPA14Y
UPS CHARGES COMP.PRINTOU
10-4420-210
02039
4.93
COMP.SVCS. 1/84
10-4420-255
02039
1071.00
UPS CHARGES COMP.PRINTOU
21-4572-210
02u39
4.92
COMP.SVCS. 1/84
21-4572-255
02039
225.00
11907
1305.85
INS SERVICES INCORPORATED
STREET SWEEP 1/17/84
16-4908-255
3839
268.14
11908
268.14
VIRGIL LIVELY
CRUSS.GUAPU 1/17-1/27/84
17-4910-250
89.04
1190q
89.04
MICHAEL LUNA
LOCAL MILEAGE,LUivA
10-4180-271
100.63
11910
100.63
JEAN NIYERS
CROSS.GIIAPD 1/1a/84
17-4910-250
12.72
11911
12.72
NAT.INSTiTUTE/PARK/GROUND Ml
REG.NIPr7 WORKSHOP 3/ 9
13-4430-270
95.00
P390
95.00
RANDY CHECK VOID NOT ATIEtfDI
G
PnILIP 14. PAGE
PARK CARE 1/1-1/29/84
13-4430-245
200.00
11912
200.00
PACIFIC TELEPHO14E
PHONE 1/7/84 C/H
10-4190-235
743.01
COI4P.PHONE 1 /7/84
10-4420-235
18.66
i
i
i
GRAND TERRACE
Lm
PAGE NO
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO
84-061
DATE 02/09/84
.' ER
M.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'0
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
COMP.PHOWE 1/7/84
21-457?-235
18.67
11913
780.36
PAINE WEBBER CASH FUND
RETIRE.P/R END.1/13/84
10-2167-000
44.25
RETIRE.P/R END.1/13/84
10-4120-140
395.26
RETIRE.P/R END.1/13/84
10-4125-140
263.50
RETIRE.P/R END.1/13/84
10-4140-140
374.35
RETIRE.P/R END.1/13/84
10-4180-140
158.90
RETIRE.P/R E;40.1/13/84
13-4430-140
126.98
RETIRE.P/R E0.1/13/84
21-4572-140
75.60
P3919
1438.84
POSTAL INSTANT PRESS
PRINT 84/85 PRELIMINARY
10-4140-210
24447
204.10
COVERS,PRILIM.84/85 BIJDG
10-4140-210
75b61
14.36
11914
218.4b
SACRAIMENTO NENSLETTER
SAC.NE,:SLETTER,SUR.12/84
10-4110-210
35.00
11915
35.00
SAN BDNO CO CENTRAL CR UNIO"
EMP.DEDUCTIOIvS P/R 1/13/
10-2165-000
947.02
P3917
947.02
SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF
DU:-1P CHARGE 12/16/b3-1/1
ib-49U0-253
042
32.40
UUMP CHARGE 12/16/83-1/1
18-49UR-253
8112
184.35
1191t
216.75
SECURITY PACIFIC INAT-L SANK
CO-iVENTION RECORDERS 10//10-4110-270
95.28
CREDIT,MASTERCHARGE
10-4120-270
36.61
CCA ELECTION SE'A.NYRNA
10-4125-270
141.64
FIN,SEiA.ilONTEREY,ED
10-4140-270
203.71
P3915
404.02
FED.P/K DEPOSIT 1/b4
10-21bi-000
28b2.04
P392C
28b2.04
FED.P/R DEPOSIT P/R 12/1'10-2161-000
1427.52
P3921
1427.52
i
i
In
GRAND TERRACE
4
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 8 4 — 0 81
DATE 02/09/84
tq.AER
Ai.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
SIG.MAINT.(3) 1203
1b-4909—P55
35767
199.23
11917
199.23 -
BILL SINN
SIGNS C/C CONSTRUCTION
10-4190-220
152.64
P3914
152.64
S0. CALIF. EDISON COMPANY
ELEC.C/H 1/12/84
10-4190-238
171.61
ELEC.SPRINKLERS,PARK 1/1213-4430-238
16.Q7
ELEC.B/P LIGHTS,PARK 1/1213-4430-238
286.14
ELEC.SIG.(1) 1/12/84
16-4510-238
183.29
ELEC.BART/PALM 1/12/84
16-4510-238
13.48
ELEC.ST.LIGHTS 11/1-12/3116-451A-238
4054.42
1191E
4725.Q1
SUNRAY PRESS
PRINT RECREATION PROGRAM
13-4430-230
276.97
P3916
276.97
TRAFFIC GUIDE
DIRECTIONAL CONTROL
Ib-4900-220
7078
215.75
1191
215.75
DEVICE
PAYROLL
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-2161-000
1434.52
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-21b2-000
265.07
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-2163—n00
101.23
PAYROLL ENCINr, 1/13/84
10-2164-000
643.00
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
1v-2165-000
947.02
PAYROLL ENDI14G 1/13/84
10-2167-000
44.25
PAYROLL ENDINIG 1/13/84
IU-2170-000
97.89
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-4110-120
750.00
PAYROLL ENpIIaG 1/13/84
10-4120-110
3187.56
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-4125-110
2125.02
PAYROLL ENUI^IG 1/13/84
10-4140-110
3018.96
j
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
10-4180-110
1261.46
PAYRULL ENDING 1/13/84
13-4430-110
1024.01
PAYROLL ENDING 1/13/84
21-4572-110
609.68
0
8403.731
n
n
GRAND TERRACE PAGE NO. 5
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-0t1 DATE 02/09/84
PAYEE WARRANT CHECK
:1 ER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT
RITTEN 10201.24
REPAID 119554.85
ACCRUED .00
TOTAL 129756.09
RECAP BY FUND
FUND 10
FUND 13
FUND 16
FUND 17
FUND 13
FUND 21
RE -PAID
WRITTEN
11090.91
2932.62
1768.31
1767.21
.00
4698.57
.00
101.76
.00
452.49
795.63
248.59
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, HE AFO ELISTED CHECKS FOR P YMENT OF CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE E PENDIT RES FOR THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY.
01
.-
EDWARD R. CLARK
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE OFFICER
STAFF REPORT Si"
0,0
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE: 2-9-84
AGENDA ITEM NO. S 13r
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE NEWS MEDIA TO VOLUNTARILY REFRAIN FROM
PROJECTING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS UNTIL CLOSING OF THE POLLS.
Congressman Edwards sent a letter and proposed resolution which
will be introduced in Congress, requesting support.
Mayor Grant requested that this resolution be placed on the
Agenda for Council consideration.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL: -
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION.
ME
END;NG CITY,
OU CNCIL APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING ALL NEWS MEDIA
PROJECTION OR PREDICTION OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RESULTS PRIOR TO THE CLOSING OF POLLS THROUGHOUT
THE UNITED STATES.
WHEREAS, early election -day projections can significantly discourage
participation in our electoral process, particularly on the West Coast; and
WHEREAS, voter turnout in 1980 was the lowest since 1948; and
WHEREAS, in 1980 countless individuals were observed leaving polling
places following announcements of a projected presidential winner, and three
percent of Western United States registered voters reported not voting because
of early election projections on television and radio, and;
WHEREAS, the increasing development of technology and techniques could
result in earlier projections in future elections; and
WHEREAS, the damaging effect of early election projections on our
political process and voter participation outweighs any social benefit; and
WHEREAS, the American right to cast informed and educated votes is the
cornerstone of our democracy, and the freedom of the press is intended to
further that basic right; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace has a
compelling interest and inherent duty to protect the voting rights of all
Americans and to seek an increased participation in the electoral prcess;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace that said City Council calls upon the television and radio
industry and other members of the news media to voluntarily refrain from
projecting presidential election results or making predictions in presidential
elections until all the polls throughout the United States have closed.
ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 1984.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of GrandMayor of the City of Grand Terrace
Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof.
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
DON EDWARDS
1 OTH DISTRICT. CALIFORNIA
COMMITTEE ON
JUDICIARY
CHAIRMAN
SUBCOMMITTEE ON
CIVIL AND
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
COMMITTEE ON
VETERANS' AFFAIRS
Honorable
Mayor
A �.
FURNISHEDTO:; ?''��� �
i
WASHINGTON OFFICE.
(202) 225-3072
DISTRICT OFFICES:
ALAME
Conarezz of the Eniteb btate� 1625 THE SwN JosE, CALIFORNIARMA A
ORNIA 95126
(408) 292-0143
3bowe of RepraentatibeZ
Waoington, ;8.C. 2O5I5
January 20, 1984
Hugh Grant
22795 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, California 92324
Dear Mayor Grant:
38750 PASEO PADRE PARKw"
FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94536
(415) 792-5320
RECEIVED
JAN23 W4
CITY 8F WNQ TERRACE
As you know, early election -day projections have come
to play a significant role in discouraging participation in
our electoral process, particularly in California. In 1980,
we witnessed a three percent decline in turnout, about
400,000 California voters, and watched citizens actually
leave the polls because of the projections by broadcasters.
I feel that it is in the national interest for the
broadcasters to act responsibly by voluntarily refraining
from early election projections, but apparently, the
networks don't perceive they are interfering with citizens'
constitutional rights.
Clearly, there is a growing concern in the West about
the effect of early election projections. According to
several polls, 71% of Western voters believe that
broadcasters should not have announced their projections
until all the polls had closed and 64% favor prohibiting
early projections entirely.
Because I firmly believe that a person's vote is a
precious right and that everyone's vote counts and because
the broadcasters have refused to act responsibly, I am
introducing a Resolution in Congress this month calling upon
the broadcasters to take voluntary action. I have enclosed
a copy for your information. I encourage and welcome your
support.
If you have any questions or need further information,
please don't hesitate to call me (202) 225-3072, or Debbie
McFarland and Pam Barry at (202) 226-2313. I look forward
to receiving your comments and working with you on this
issue.
Sincerely,
�H� &144,j�
Don Edwards
Member of Congress
DE/pab
�z
S"�AFF REP(ZRT
12.256
12.259
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: February 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. c/
SUBJECT: Status of FY 1983-84 Community Development Block Grant Projects
FUNDING REQUIRED ! x
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
Last year, the City Council approved $31,908 in Community Development Block Grant
funds for the following projects:
1. Rehabilitate Community Center
restrooms to meet handicap requirements $15,200
2. Construct Community Center parking lot 16,708
Total Budget $31,908
The Community Center restrooms are almost complete; however, due to additional plumbing
and electrical required, and new handicap building requirements, this project will require
a change order in the amount of $2,462.42. Of this total amount, only $1,482.42 is
eligible for reimbursement by HUD. The remaining $980.00 will have to come from City
funds. If approved by City Council, the City's budget for CDBG projects should read
as follows:
Proiect
1. Community Center restrooms
Change Order #1 (CDBG funds)
Change Order #2 (City funds)
2. Community Center parking lot
Minus Change Order No. 1,
transfer of funds
New budget amount
Staff recommends that the City Council:
Original Contract Amount
$15,200
1,482.42
980.00
a1 /,bb2.4L
Original Balance Amount
16,708
1,482.42
$15,225.58
TRANSFER $1,482.42 FROM THE COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT ACCOUNT NO. 10-4593-255 TO THE
COMMUNITY CENTER RESTROOMS ACCOUNT NO. 10-4592-255 TO COVER COSTS INCURRED BY CHANGE
ORDER NO. 1. TRANSFER $980.00 FROM BALANCE FORWARD JUNE 30, 1984, TO COMMUNITY CENTER
RESTROOMS ACCOUNT NO. 10-4592-255 TO COVER COSTS INCURRED BY CHANGE ORDER NO. 2. THIS
WILL COMPLETE THE COMMUNITY CENTER RESTROOM PROJECT, LEAVING AN ADJUSTED BALANCE FORWARD
OF $554,175.00.
JK/lbk
S"LAFF REPOT
12.41
C R /, ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) PTETING DATE: Feb. 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Resubmittal of FY 83-84, Transportation Development Act Claim
FUNDING REQUIRED
P,D FUND I tail RFQU I RED X
On January 25, 1984, the City received the attached letter from SANBAG regarding the
refiling of the City's claim for FY 1983-84 TDA Article 8 funds.
The funding now available in the amount of $65,046.00 is an increase of $6,204 over
the previous allocation of $58,842.00.
Staff recommends that City Council:
1. APPROVE THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RESUBMITTAL OF THIS CLAIM.
2. AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE OFFICER TO SIGN THE NON -TRANSIT AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FORMS.
Attachments
1. Letter from Michael A. Bair
2. Resolution
AE/JK/lbk
410 -PENDING CITY
RESOLUTION N0. 84-
` OUNCIL APPROVAL
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FY 1983-84 TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS.
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has been apportioned $110,147 from
SCAG for the 1983-84 Fiscal Year; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has assigned $45,101 for transit
purposes to Omnitrans, thereby leaving a balance of $65,046 to be claimed for
Article 8 Street and Road Purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace that the City of Grand Terrace claims $65,042 and forwards said
claim, along with a certified copy of this Resolution, to SANBAG for
processing.
ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 1984.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof.
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
The San Bernar ' o County Transportation Commission
SAN BERNARDY ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
;PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS
Wells Fargo Building, 334 W. Third Street, Suite 401
San Bernardino, California 92401 (714) 884-8276
INFORMATION C=
January 23, 1984 :FURNISHELLM5 114.
A - '
RECEIVED AT
Mr. Edward R. Clark
Finance/Administrative
Services Officer
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Bartom- Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
KICAK & ASSOCIATES
Regarding: Availability of additional Local Transportation Funds
for street and road improvements (Article 8)
Dear Mr. Clark:
Included in the January SANBAG Board agenda was a staff memo
identifying additional Local Transportation Funds (SB325) being
available to the cities and county this year. At that time,
staff received several questions relating to how these funds were
distributed to the various jurisdictions. Staff was directed to
document the distribution process when notifying the
jurisdictions of the amounts available.
Upon further review, we are clarifying the information
contained in the January memo. On June 14, 1980, SANBAG staff
notified the jurisdictions of a "residual balance" (actually an
unallocated apportionment amount from prior years) and a
reduction in the total fund estimate for FY 1980-81. Most
jurisdictions filed revised claims in order to obtain the maximum
amount available. Those jurisdictions which did not, continued
to have an unallocated apportionment amount available in FY
1981-82. To complicate matters more, SCAG found it necessary to
reduce Article 8 allocation instructions in late June, 1981,
because of a shortfall in the estimated funds available. This
resulted in a new unallocated apportionment amount for each
jurisdiction at the close of the fiscal year. THE AMOUNTS
IDENTIFIED IN THE JANUARY SANBAG BOARD MEMO AS "PRIOR YEAR CARRY
IN" ARE ACTUALLY THE UNALLOCATED APPORTIONMENT AMOUNTS AT THE END
OF FY 1980-81. RECEIVED
JAN2594'
CI1Y OF GRAND TERRACE
CITIES OF ADELANTO, BARSTOW BIG BEAR LAKE, CHINO, COLTON. FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA. MONTCLAIR,
NEEDLES, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. REDLANDS, RIALTO SAN BERNARDINO, UPLAND VICTORVILLE. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Attached you will find a copy of the revision to the City's FY
1983-84 Article 8 Claim and a set of blank forms to be used. New
governing body authorization will be required with the revised
claim. If you have received a revised claim form from SCAG
correcting FY 1981-82 and FY 1982-83 amounts, be sure to use
those numbers.
Should you have any questions regarding this transmittal,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
'Yr
Michael A. Bair
Assistant Director
mb
Attachment
Date:
STAFF REPURT41,
f�
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. -�
SUBJECT: 'MARCH ON THE CAPITOL'
Seth Armstead plans to attend subject seminar, as requested by the Mayor, provided
the Council approves.
The seminar is scheduled for Tuesday. February 28, 1984 from 9:00 a.m. until
1:30 p.m. at Sacramento Convention Center, Sacramento, California.
Seminar is designed to draw attention for the need for top priority by the 1984
legislature on stable and long-term financing for cities and counties.
The cost to attend subject seminar is estimated at:
Airfare $124.20
Registration fee .00
Travel approx. 20.00
Meals approx. 20.00
Total $164.20
Staff recommends that the Council:
A. AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF $164.20. FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE 10-4120-270
DEPARTMENT BUDGET IN LINE ITEM "TRAVEL, CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS."
B. APPROVE SETH ARMSTEAD ATTENDING THE 'MARCH ON THE CAPITOL' SEMINAR.
SA:lo
Encl.
.,
MONK
10011F
5111ON
California Cities
Work Together
League of California Cities
1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 444-5790
A N N O U N C I N G . . .
Sacramento, California
January 10, 1984
A ONE —DAY 'MARCH ON THE CAPITOL' TO FOCUS
MEDIA AND LEGISLATIVE ATTENTION ON THE NEED
FOR LONG—TERM, STABLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCING.
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 281 IL984 -- SACRAMENTO CONVENTION CENTER
Stable and long-term financing for cities and counties is the League's top priority
for the 1984 legislative session. This "March on the Capitol" is designed to bring
still further attention to this issue. City elected officials, staff members, and
particularly key department heads, union representatives and other community
leaders are urgently requested to join city officials from around the state for
this one -day meeting. Local government has developed unusually good public expo-
sure and interest in the Legislature on this subject. Long-term financing was
the subject of seven legislative hearings since September 1983, and was the princi-
pal focus of the the Governor's New Partnership Task Force. There now exists a
major proposal by the Administration, as well as proposals by the Chairmen of both
the Senate and Assembly Local Government Committees to provide long-term financing
in the 1984 legislative year.
Because there will be many competing interests in the Legislature to take advantage
of the upswing in the state's economy and sharp increase in state revenues, cities
must make a good lobbying effort early in the session to secure a stable revenue
base. All legislators know what the League and cities want and need in 1984, but
there is some doubt among many legislators as to how important a stable revenue
base Is for cities. Because this doubt exists in the minds of many, it is parti-
cularly important that community leaders other than city officials participate in
this lobbying campaign.
As you might well imagine, there are a number of proposals in this first week of
January for long-term financing for cities. These include shifts of sales tax, and
property tax and Constitutional amendments which would guarantee to local govern-
ment subventions such as the vehicle license fee and the cigarette tax. All
(OVER)
proposals urge a repea l the AB 8 deflator and all aresigned to be genuinely
long-term. As of this date it is not possible to identify all proposals by
author and bill number. We expect the bills to take shape in the second or
third week of January. By the date of our Capitol March, however, on February
28, the bills will be in final form and ready for legislative hearing.
When making arrangements to attend the March on the Capitol, we urge you to make
appointments with your legislators as soon as possible. Our program will be
completed following luncheon, at about 1:30 p.m. We also urge you to bring as
broadly-based a coalition from your community as possible. This should include
employee groups, major department heads, including police and fire if possible,
business leaders from the community, as well as elected city officials, of course.
Finally, we ask that when you discuss long-term financing with your legislator,
ask for a very positive and specific commitment to supporting stable and long-
term financing for cities. Without an early commitment by legislators, it's quite
possible that this issue will be lost in the competition for attention.
It is essential that each city be represented by at least one elected official.
The March will be primarily a lobbying effort and will be preceded by an extensive
press briefing and individual meetings between the League's officers and the
Administration and legislative leaders. Our objective is to personally contact
on the same day all 120 legislators and to continue the momentum gained from the
interim hearings and from the Administration's proposals.
PROGRAM
9:00 a.m.-9:30 a.m.
Check -in and pick up program materials - Yolo Room
9:30 a.m.-9:45 a.m.
Welcome by Dorill Wright, League President, Mayor of Port
Hueneme; and Don Benninghoven, Executive Director
9:45 a.m.-10:30 a.m.
City Position, League Lobbying Strategy, Recommended
Approach to Securing Your Legislators' Commitments
10:30 a.m.-10:45 a.m.
Break
10:45 a.m.-11:15 a.m.
"Economic Outlook for the State and Competing Needs For
Emerging Surplus Revenues," by William Hamm, Legislative
Analyst (invited)
11:15 a.m.-12:00 noon
Panel of the Major Legislative Authors of Long -Term
Financing Legislation; Contents of Principal Bills,
Status, Legislative Prospects and Strategy for Success-
ful Passage
12:00 noon
Luncheon - Sacramento/El Dorado Rooms
Speaker: Governor George Deukmejian (invited)
"The Administration's Proposal for Long -Term Finance"
1:30 p.m.
Adjourn for free afternoon of lobbying legislators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
REGISTRATION: NO FEE. PICK UP BRIEFING MATERIALS AT DOOR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-2-
4
SaAFF REPORT ft"t
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. '5' 1--
SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNING COMMISSIONERS INSTITUTE
FUNDING REQUIRED X
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
At their last meeting, the Planning Commission was notified of the Commissioners
Institute in San Diego, February 29 through March 2, 1984. At that time, they
requested that a staff member attend that seminar. I briefly advised the City
Council of this and stated that I would be willing to send one of my personnel,
provided that the costs incurred for this attendance be shared by the City as
well as my office.
Attached you will find estimated costs for attending this seminar. It is
respectfully requested that the City Council consider sharing these costs as
proposed.
Staff recommends that the Council:
AUTHORIZE THAT FUNDS BE TAKEN FROM LINE ITEM 10-4801-270 TO COVER COST OF =
MEETING OF APPROXIMATELY $200.00. -
JK/lbk
Attacfiments
M
Estimated Costs
Function:
Date:
Location:
Person Attending:
1. Registration fee
2. Hotel room 2 nights @55.00
3. Meals
4. Transportation
5. Salary costs (no overhead)
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS
Sources of. Funding:
City of Grand Terrace
(acct. 10-4801-270)
Balance, Kicak & Associates
League of California Cities
Planning Commissioners Institute
Feb. 29 - March 2, 1984
Town & Country Hotel, San Diego, CA
Tim D. Serlet
$ 85.00
110.00
60.00
40.00
380.70
$675.70
200.00
475.70 ✓
CITY: <. w'o _%Ly" 4r
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS INSTITUTE
FEBRUARY 29-MARCH 2, 1984
Town and Country Hotel, San Diego
ADVANCE REGISTRATION
(This form is for conference registration, not hotel reservations.)
Enter below first and last name and official title as they should appear on the conference badge and
registration cards. Please indicate your spouse's name if he/she will attend. MOBILE
NAME SPOUSES WORKSHOP
TITLE NAME PREFERENCE
(see program on
— Fri. afternoon)
r
Number of registration fees:
o .0
/ City officials at $ 85 each =
Non -city public officials at $ 95 each =
Non-public officials at $ 100 each =
TOTAL $ ENCLOSED
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
Method of payment: CITY CHECK Q PERSONAL CHECK Q (Please no purchase orders.)
NOTE: PAYMENT MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM TO PROCESS THE ADVANCE REGISTRATION
Registration receipts will be sent to address indicated below:
Name: /�iW S.eGc�'7' Title:,y-T,p,�r�-,ayiti6
Address: ;o, 6 .C�D.t/ �o eD•- ' //O City:,1,",�,w�,peq� ZiP:
DEADLINE FOR ADVANCE REGISTRATION IS FEBRUARY 17, 1984.
ATTENDANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
We plan to send officials to the Planning Commissioners Institute in San Diego, but we do
(please indicate number)
not wish to register in advance. (No commitment to attend is implied.)
CITY:
PLEASE RETURN TO: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE
P.O. BOX 7005
LAFAYETTE, CA 94549
NOT LATER THAN FEBRUARY 17, 1983
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIE
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS INSTITUTE
February 29-March 2, 1984
TOWN AND COUNTRY HOTEL, SAN DIEGO
HOTEL RESERVATION FORM
NAME: � 'f
ADDRESS:
CITY: �.tvyo E .ocE STATE: eV ZIP: "nz 1,Zlf
DATE OF ARRIVAL: ,c�B,e�,oey 2'�p HOUR: 3 : o o A
P.
(CHECK -IN TIME IS 3:00 P.M.)
DATE OF DEPARTURE: ,?
(CHECK-OUT TIME I5 12:00 NOON, LUGGAGE CAN BE STORED)
ACCOMMODATIONS REQUESTED:
Standard Superior
/ Single Room 0 Person) at (ED $65.00
Per Day
Double Room (2 Persons) at $65.00 $75.00
Per Day
Twin Room (2 Persons/ $65.00 $75.00
2 Beds) Per Day
I WILL BE SHARING THE ROOM WITH:
Deluxe
$75.00
$85.00
$85.00
Reservations must be received by FEBRUARY 8, 1983 in order to be sure that your room request
is filled. Reservations received after February 8 will be on a space available basis. A deposit in
the amount of $65 must be included in order to process your room reservations. Deposits are
refundable if your reservation is cancelled at least 48 hours prior to the check -in date.
Deposit enclosed
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO:
TOWN AND COUNTRY HOTEL
500 HOTEL CIRCLE
P.O. BOX 80098
SAN DIEGO, CA 92138.
ATTN: Reservations
NOT LATER THAN FEBRUARY 8, 1984
SZAFF REPORT °
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MzETING DATE: February 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. S G
SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
As a result of the construction of the new Civic Center complex, the City is forced
to relocate 18 wooden light poles. These poles were utilized as parking bumpers
within the old parking lot of City Hall. These poles vary in length from 12 foot
to 40 foot. Said poles are in an advanced state of decay, and are of no viable
use to the City at present.
Staff Recommends that the Council:
(1) Declare 18 utility poles, varying in length from 12-40 feet, as
Surplus City Property;
(2) Authorize the City Clerk to advertise for bids on the Surplus City Property.
RLA
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
REQUEST FOR BIDS
BID NO. GTSPB 84-01
DUE: Before 2:00 p.m
DATE: on February 20, 1984
SURPLUS PROPERTY
18 wood utility poles, varying in length from
12-40 feet.
Submit bid in a sealed envelope and mark as
indicated below:
Bidder's Name & Address
City of Grand Terrace
City Clerk's Office
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Bid No: GTSPB 84-01
Due: February 20, 1984
Hour: 2:00 p.m.
Project: Surplus Property
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
NOTICE INVITING BIDS
The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, at the City Council Meeting of
February 9, 1984, declared 18 wood utility poles, varying in length from 12-40
feet, as surplus property
These items may be examined at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., from February 10-20, 1984. Bids will be accepted for all items -
no partial quanitities.
Bids will be opened in the City Clerk's Office at 2:00 p.m., February 20,
1984. Successful Bidder will be notified. Payment is to be made with cash
or a cashier's check. Items not claimed by February 27, at 5:00 p.m., will be
offered to the next highest bidder.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA.
City Clerk
City of Grand Terrace
Date:
0 Council Agenda Item 7E
EVMGENCY OPMATIONS CON11ITTEE
December 159 1983
MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Emergency Operations Committee was held on
December 15, 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:, -Roberta. Fulton
Ed Luers
Vic Pfennighausen
Staff Present: Tom Coyle, Administrative Assistant
o Reviewed DOC mail from the past month
o Reviewed the Emergency Management Training Course Catalog, Tom Coyle
will submit to Council a list of proposed courses to be taken.
o Discussed Tom Coyle's proposed City Ifz agement resource allocation
in response to an emergency incident.
o Vic Pfennighausen provided a draft of a Communications Plan for review.
o The next meeting will be January 19, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
fake Harris, Chairman
RECEIVED
JAN 2 71934
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
TQA
T �%
�
•' 12-8.5007
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: Feb. 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM N0.
SUBJECT: Wilden Pump & Engineering Company Appeal
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNIDING REQUIRED XX
Attached you will find a request from Wilden Pump & Engineering Company, their letter
dated February 1, 1984. In that letter Mr. Tuck, Vice President, is requesting that
the provisions of Ordinance 44 requiring additional dedication along the frontage, as
well as installation of the improvements along that frontage, based on the recently
adopted General Plan, be unconditionally waived.
The City Council recently approved the amended General Plan, Circulation Element for
the City of Grand Terrace whereby Van Buren Street would require additional dedication
and the improvements as they now exist would require relocation. Specifically, the
existing right-of-way now is 66 feet with improvements at 22 feet from centerline.
Based on the General Plan, the new right-of-way width would be 88 feet, requiring an
additional 11 feet of dedication and the improvements would be 32 feet from center-
line, or 10 feet southerly of the existing improvements.
In the recent past, during the General Plan Update study, there were discussions
specifically regarding plan for Area "B". It had been suggested that a loop system
of streets be considered between the buffer zone and any proposed development. Such
loop system would most probably eliminate the need for additional widening of all of
the existing residential streets between Michigan and the future proposed streets
serving Area "B". In addition, in his letter Mr. Tuck states that Wilden Pump
and Engineering Company does propose to expand their facilities at some future date.
Hopefully, between now and that time, a specific plan will be developed that
would determine the need for widening Van Buren between Michigan and Area "B".
Staff recommends that the City Council:
WAIVE THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE 44 WITH RESPECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATION
AND THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, AT
THIS TIME.
JK/lbk
Attachment
WILDEN PUMP & ENGINEERING CO.
22069 VAN BUREN STREET P O BOX B45 COLTON CALIFORNIA 92324 / , 714, 783-0621
February 1, 1984
JOSEPH KICAK, CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE i�PCAK & ASSGCrl; T ES
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Dear Mr Kicak,
Wilden Pump & Engineering Company would like to appeal to the City
Council for waiver of items 14 and 15 on your letter of January 30,
1984, regarding plan check for the proposed building project at
22069 Van Buren Street, Grand Terrace, California.
After examining the impact these requirements would have on our
property, we feel that the adverse aesthetic, architectural, and
financial burdens far outweigh the advantages. We would like to
point out that an unconditional waver of these requirements would
not forgo the possibility of future reconsideration. After completion
of the presently proposed building project, property owned by Wilden
Pump & Engineering Company will only be 50 percent developed. If
future development in the area west of our property should occur
necessitating wider streets, we would be interested in developing
the remainder of our property as well, thereby permitting a second
opportunity for consideration of these requirements.
Sincerely,
WILDEN PUMP & ENGINEE IN CO.
Alan D. Tuck, Jr.
Vice President
ADT:cjs
S"LAFF
tD
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: February 9, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. -
SUBJECT: Municipal Code
The City's Municipal Code is now completed, and copies of the Code
have been furnished to Council, as well as being reviewed by our
City Attorney.
The total cost for codification is $14,271.11. Of this amount,
$2,060 has been paid and $8,897 remains in the codification
account, which will leave $3,314 due and payable. Book Publishing
has indicated this remaining balance can be paid from FY 1984-85
funding, and funds have been requested in the City Clerk's Office
Expense Account for FY 1984-85, in anticipation of the shortage.
The total cost exceeded the estimated cost because the completed
code was much larger than expected. Also, in order to complete
the codification, Book Publishing had to conduct a complete
analysis of the San Bernardino County Code.
The cost of codification included the editorial work and printing
of each page at $16.00 per page; 50 codes and binders; tabbed
divider pages, freight charges and sales tax, as well as printing
25 sets of the zoning code separately,'to be sold to the public.
The Municipal Code will also be sold to the public, once a
recommended price has been established and submitted to Council
for approval. Another cost included in the total price was
submitting a proof to the City prior to final publication, which
many agencies do not request.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
APPROVE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE, BY TITLE ONLY, WITH SECOND
READING AND PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED AT THE MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 23, 1984.
ME
P. DJNG CITY.
v COUIIL APPROVAL
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE GRAND
TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, The California State Legislature has provided for the
codification and publication of the permanent and general ordinances of the
cities in Sections 50022.1--50022.10 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Book Publishing Company, Seattle, Washington, has
compiled, edited, and published a codification of the permanent and general
ordinances of the City of Grand Terrace, California; and
WHEREAS, there have been filed and there are now on file in the office
of the City Clerk, for public inspection, three copies of a document entitled
"Grand Terrace Municipal Code." together with three copies of each of the
secondary codes therein adopted by references;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Adoption. Pursuant to the provisions of Sections
50022.1--50022.8 and-5-0=. 0 of the Government Code, there is hereby adopted
the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code" as published by Book Publishing Company,
Seattle, Washington, together with those secondary codes adopted by reference
as authorized by the California State Legislature, save and except those
portions of the secondary codes as are deleted or modified by the provisions
of the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code."
SECTION 2. Title--Citation--Reference. This Code shall be known as
the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code, and it shall be sufficient to refer to
said Code as the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code" in any prosecution for the
violation of any provision thereof or in any proceeding at law or equity. It
shall be sufficient to designate any ordinance adding to, amending,
correcting, or repealing all or any part or portion thereof as an addition to,
amendment to. correction, or repeal of the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code."
Further reference may be had to the titles, chapters, sections, and
subsections of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code" and such references shall
apply to that numbered title, chapter, section, or subsection as it appears in
the Code.
SECTION 3. Codification Authority. This Code consists of all the
regulatory and penal ordinances and certain of the administrative ordinances
of the City of Grand Terrace, California, codified pursuant to the provisions
of Section 50022.1--50022.8 and 50022.10 of the Government Code.
SECTION 4. Ordinances Passed Prior to Adoption of the Code. The last
ordinance included in this code was ordinance No. 12, passed June 9. 1983.
The following ordinances, passed subsequent to Ordinance No. 72, but prior to
adoption of this Code, are hereby adopted and made a part of this Code:
Ordinance Nos. 73, 74, & 75
SECTION 5. Reference Applies to All Amendments. Whenever a reference
is made to this Code as the "Grand Terrace Municipal Code" or to any portion
thereof, or to any ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace, California, the
reference shall apply to all amendments, corrections, and additions
heretofore, now or hereafter made.
SECTION 6. Title, Chapter and Section Headings. Title, Chapter, and
Section headings containe,Cd herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit,
modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning, or intent of the
provisions of any title, chapter, or section hereof.
SECTION 7. Reference to Specific Ordinances. The provisions of this
Code shall not in any manner affect matters of record which refer to, or are
otherwise connected with ordinances which are therein specifically designated
by number or otherwise and which are included within the Code, but such
reference shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions
contained within this Code.
SECTION 8. Effect of Code on Past Actions and Obligations. Neither
the adoption of this Code nor the repeal or amendment hereby of any ordinance
or part or portion of any ordinance of the City shall in any manner affect the
prosecution for violations of ordinances, which violations were committed
prior to the effective date, hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any
license, fee, or penalty at said effective date due and unpaid under such
ordinances. or be construed as affecting any of the provisions of such
ordinances relating to the collection of any such license, fee, or penalty, or
the penal validity of any bond or cash deposit in lieu thereof required to be
posted, filed, or deposited pursuant to any ordinance and all rights and
obligations thereunder appertaining shall continue in full force and effect.
SECTION 9. Constitutionality. If any section, subsection, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this o e is or any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Code. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this Code, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses, or phrases had been declared invalid or unconstitutional,
and if for any reason this Code should be declared invalid or
unconstitutional, then the original ordinance or ordinances shall be in full
force and effect.
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Code shall become effective on the
31st date after adoption of this rdinance
SECTION 11. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in
three (3) public places designated for such purpose by the City Council.
SECTION 12. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Grand Terrace on the day of 1984. and finally
adopted and ordered posted at a repuTar meetings s d City Council on the
day of , 1984.
- 2 -