03/22/1984lo'l
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
TERRACE VIE
W ELEMLNTARY SCHOOL MARCH 22, 1984
22731 Grand Terrace Road '_ 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
* Call to Order
* Invocation - Chaplain Bronwen Watts, Loma Linda University Medical Center
* Pledge of Allegiance
* Roll Call
Staff
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Recommendations
Council Action
1.
Approval of Minutes (3/1/84) (3/8/84)
Approve
2.
Approval of Check Register No. CRA032284
Approve
3.
Consideration of Donation to CRA Assoc. for
Legal Actions
ADJOURN TO JOINT CRA/COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1.
Items to Add/Delete
2. Civic Center Construction Briefing
3. Approval of Minutes (3/1/84) (3/8/84)
Approve
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
expected to be routine & non -controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request
an item be removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
Approve
A. Approval of Check Register No. 032284
B. Authorize City Engineer to Instruct San
Approve
Bernardino County Surveyor's Office to
Release $2,900 Road Improvement Bond on
Minor Subdivision 78-0321
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
COUNCIL AGENDA
3/22/84 - Page 2 of 2
Staff
Recommendations Council Action
6. ORAL REPORTS
A. anning Commission
B. Parks & Recreation Committee
C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
D. Crime Prevention Committee
E. Emergency Operations Committee
F. Police Chief
G. Fire Chief
H. City Engineer
I. City Attorney
J. City Manager
K. City Council
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 P.M.
A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Adopt
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE UPDATED
GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE;
APPROVING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE UP-
DATED GENERAL PLAN; AND MAKING OTHER
DETERMINATIONS.
B. Appeal of Planning Commission Determination,
Sign Variance - 22365 Barton Rd.
(Grand Terrace Professional Plaza)
C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Adopt by title
OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, RESCINDING ORDINANCE only following
NO. 73 & AMENDING THE REGULATIONS FOR COM- Public Hearing
PREHENSIVE LITTER CONTROL & MAINTENANCE OF
PUBLIC & PRIVATE PROPERTY (Second Reading)
D. FY 1984-85 Community Development Block Grant
Program
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. General Plan Update Consulting Services
9. NEW BUSINESS
A. Cultural Plan - San Bernardino Arts Council
ADJOURN TO JOINT CRA/COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING FOR CAPITAL
THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE
HELD THURSDAY, APRIL 12, 1984, AT 5:30 P.M
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 4/12/84 MEETING MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BY 12:00 NOON ON 4/4/84.
PEND1r�G CF'A APPRO"AL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MAR 2 2) 11984
CRA AGENLA ITEM NO. %
JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 1, 1984
The joint adjourned regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency with the
City Council, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Terrace View Elementary
School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 1, 1984, at
5:37 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Chairman
Jim Rigley, Vice Chairman
Tony Petta
Roy W. Nix
Barbara Pfennighausen
Seth Armstead, Executive Director
Barbara Michowski, Acting Treasurer
Ivan Hopkins, Attorney
Myrna Erway, Secretary
ABSENT: None
FY 1984-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A staff report was distributed at the meeting indicating the projects
and costs which have been completed through February 29, the projects
either under construction or approved for 1983-84, and the proposed
capital improvement projects and funds available for 1983-84 and
1984-85. Executive Director Armstead stated as directed, Staff
prepared a revised schedule of estimated revenues and capital
improvement projects either under construction or proposed, as a
result of the Public Workshop Session held February 16, 1984; the
revenues have been adjusted to reflect only available funds, not
restricted funds, which indicates funds are not available to finance
the three proposed projects for FY 1984-85; recommended keeping a
$300,000 reserve, loaning $100,000 to CRA, that the CRA budget
$140,000 for classroom airconditioning and $109,000 for the Vivienda
Bridge project, and postponing the storm drain project until funds
become available.
Mr. Rigley stated the budgeting information provided at each budgeting
session varies to the extent that he questions at what point the
information can be considered valid. Mr. Petta felt the variable
information is due to the fact that the consultants previously felt
$700,000 for the Fire Station and the cost of the civic center land,
for a total of nearly one million dollars, could be included in the
civic center financing; however, since that financing was not
available, the City had to pay cash, which would have otherwise been
available to fund capital improvement projects.
Page 1 -
CRA - 3/1/84
Mrs. Pfennighausen stated she understood from Bond Counsel the civic
center property was not included in the civic center financing because
the interest rate would be too high, and the fire station could not be
financed because the project was already completed. Mr. Rigley felt
the Agency/Council made the determination to include the fire station
in the civic center financing and was not advised that cash was paid.
Mr. Nix disagreed that the Agency/Council was unaware of the payment
for the fire station; felt payment was made sometime ago with the
understanding they would try to include that in the civic center
financing; concurred that the inability to finance that project
affected the funding available for capital improvement projects; felt
the inability to finance the fire station was not adequately
explained.
Mr. Nix felt data needs to be presented outlining the capital
improvement project status from a year ago to the present time which
will show how and why the numbers have changed and what is and is not
included; also feels additional data is needed regarding the statement
to postpone until more financing is available; questioned what the
prospects are of more financing and when it might become available.
Executive Director Armstead stated the information which has been
presented reflects only funding which is presently available;
indicated pending long-term financing legislation could provide
additional funding; will advise of the impact of state -mandated
programs on the City.
In discussion, the Agency indicated clarification is needed, since the
information presented is not consistent with that which was previously
presented, and on which previous decisions were based; discussed tax
increment, and the fact that debt must be established in a 12-year
period in order to receive tax increment over a 30-year period. Staff
indicated that the funding recommended to be loaned to CRA would
finance all proposed projects, as listed on Schedule 4 of the Staff
Report, including classroom airconditioning and the Vivienda Bridge
project, does not include storm drains, and would leave a $300,000
reserve.
City Engineer Kicak stated staff has been pursuing a number of
projects in this year's capital improvement program; the storm drain
system has been designed from the lowest end up to Pico and Gage
Canal, which is approximately 65-70% of the total storm drain system;
the cost estimates for this portion exceed the proposed budgeted
amount; recommended deferring further design until the issue is
resolved, and deferring work on other projects not being considered by
the Agency as viable projects at this time, such as Barton Road/Mt.
Vernon beautification.
Staff was directed to prepare the following information prior to
April, to be presented on a date to be established by the Agency/
Council: (1) a historical tracking record, in simplified form, such
as a pert chart, of the revenues and expenditures from incorporation
to present; (2) a detailed, substantiated breakdown of the basis used
to estimate the current revenue projections; (3) an interpretation of
how each of the proposed legislative bills, SB 1300 and AB 2468, will
affect the City's budget, to include the amount of funding the City
Page 2 -
CRA - 3/1/84
would receive and when payment of those funds can be expected; (4) a
projection of CRA revenue and commitments against CRA revenue for the
next five years, based on presently -approved projects; (City Attorney
Hopkins recommended a 12 year projection, since that is the time frame
to incur debt); (5) the impact proposed legislation relative to
state -mandated programs will have on the City; and (6) how soon a
decision must be made to ensure installation of airconditioning in the
classrooms during the summer months.
Chairman Grant opened the meeting to public participation. Danny
Schwier, 22843 Desoto, recommended that staff be better prepared for
the meetings, and that there be more coordination between staff and
the Agency. Steve Kiacz, 11809 Holly, stated there appears to be a
communication breakdown between staff and the Agency/Council; felt the
various activities have not been properly monitored; felt a pert chart
should be prepared identifying the sources of state and federal
funding and project development; felt the City should not rely on
state and federal funding.
ADJOURN - The Joint CRA/Council Adjourned Regular Meeting adjourned at
T:1Z p.m. The next regular meeting will be held March 8, 1984 at 5:30
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
6� 2.11
Secret�fy
APPROVED:
Chairman
Page 3 -
CRA - 3/1/84
450 PE-NDG CRA APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 8, 1984
MAR 2 FR4
CRA AGEi,DA ITEM, NO. /
The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,
was held in the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand
Terrace, California, on March 8, 1984, at 5:37 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Chairman
Jim Rigley, Vice Chairman
Tony Petta
Roy W. Nix
Barbara Pfennighausen
Seth Armstead, Executive Director
Barbara Michowski, Acting Treasurer
Ivan Hopkins, Attorney
Myrna Erway, Secretary
ABSENT: None
MINUTES (2-23-84)
CRA-84-22 Motion by Mrs. Pfennighausen, Second by Mr. P.igley, ALL AYES, to
approve the Minutes of February 23, 1984 as presented.
CRA-84-23
Page 1 -
CRA 3/8/84
CHECK REGISTER No. CRA030884
Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mrs. Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to approve
Check Register No. CRA030884 as presented.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT PROPOSALS
Executive Director Armstead stated the evaluation criteria for the
selection of an economic development consultant was previously
submitted to the Agency Members for review and input; assumes the
criteria is satisfactory since no input was received; three proposals
were received and will be provided for review; a meeting has been
scheduled for March 13 at 2:00 p.m. to evaluate the proposals.
Consultant selection will be on the April 12 Agenda. Chairman Grant
noted a letter dated March 8, 1984 from David Terbest, Grand Terrace
Chamber of Commerce, regarding this matter was distributed at this
meeting.
ADJOURN - The regular meeting adjourned at 5:46 p.m. The next regular
meeting will be held March 22, 1984.
APPROVED:
Chairman
Respectfully submitted,
?-/--) cl-�
7ecreta
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
MARCH 22, 1984
PENDING CRA AFPROVAL
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
CHECK REGISTER NO.
()
2�
CRA032284
CHECK
NO.
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF MARCH
22, 1984
(1)
P1355
HUGH GRANT
AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE
MARCH
1984
$ 150.00
(2)
P1356
JAMES RIGLEY
AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE
MARCH
1984
150.00
(3)
P1357
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
MEDICAL INSURANCE, PETTA.
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION,
NIX. MARCH 1984
200.00
(4)
P1358
ROY NIX
AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE
MARCH
1984
100.00
(5)
P1359
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE
MARCH
1984
150.00
(6)
P1360
BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINAL PAYMENT ON GENERAL
PLAN
1,700.00
(7)
P1361
NAZAREK, HARPER, HOPKINS &
McFARLIN LEGAL SERVICES FOR DEC. 1983
&
JAN. 1984
650.00
(8)
P1362
SHEPHERD & YOUNG
FINAL PAYMENT ON EXTRA WORK
AT
FIRE STATION
2,405.62
TOTAL:
$ 5,505.62
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN
AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA.
THOMAS J. SCHWAB
TREASURER
'i S AFF Date: 3/19/84
C R A ITEM (XX) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: MARCH 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DONATION TO CRA ASSOCIATION FOR LEGAL ACTIONS
FUNDING IS REQUIRED X
FUNDING IS NOT REQUIRED
See attached letter Community Redevelopment Agencies Association received
February 21, 1984 and summary of four cases. A discussion with Milt Farrell and
Sandy Johnson, his consultant, clarified the request for a number of the
redevelopment agencies (CRA) in support of the four cases currently in the Courts of
Appeal.
These cases have a state-wide significance and the Association has funded a
Redevelopment Legal Counsel Advisory Committee to review them and recommend a course
o action for the necessary legs wTrfor —tie 177 CRA cities within the State.
Attached for your information is a list of ranges of donations of the cities by
population for the amounts being given on a one-time basis to carry these four
cases. Note that any excess funds will be used for future cases.
Funds not to exceed $300 are available in Department CRA Professional Services, Line
Item No. 22-4200-250.
Staff recommends that the Agency:
A. CONSIDER A VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION IN THE RANGE OF $150 TO $300 TO THE CRA
ASSOCIATION.
B. AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $300. FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FROM LINEITEM
NO. 22-4200-250 LEAVING A. BALANCE OF $3700.
SA: Io
Encs. 3
Lm
CRA ASSOCIATON PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION
TO SUPPORT FOUR CASES ON BEHALF OF ALL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA
Population
Amount
0 -
25,000
$150 -
$300
25,000 -
50,000
300 -
500
50,000 -
75,000
500 -
600
75,000 -
100,000
600 -
700
100,000 -
200,000
700 -
800
200,000 -
500,000
800 -
900
500,000 -
1,000,000
1,000
- 2,000
1,000,000
over
2,000
- 5,000
President
Allen J Parker
Seal Beach
President Elect
Jean T Smith
El Cerrito
Vice President/
Northern Region
Roger Anderman
Salina:;
Vice President/
Southern Region
David N Lund
Long Beach
Treasurer
Bruce Pope
Sacramento
Immediate Past President
William R. Rugg
San Leandro
Executive Director/
Secretary
Milton R. Farrell
Board of Directors
Gary Binger
Walnut Creek
Grant Brimhall
Thousand Oaks
Kenneth Caresio
Duarte
Curtis Grindahl
Vallejo
Claude J Klug
Commerce
Gaylord F Knapp
Cerritos
Lloyd de Llamas
Monterey Park
Bud Ovrom
Downey
Norman Priest
Anaheim
David Ream
Santa Ana
William Waterhouse
Concord
Community Redevelopment Agencies Association
1400 K Street, Suite 204, Sacramento, California 95814 • Telephone (916) 448-8760
February 15, 1984
Mr. Seth Armstead
Executive Director
Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS
Dear Mr. Armstead:
At the request of a number of redevelopment agencies,
the Community Redevelopment Agencies Association has
taken action to support four cases which are currently
in Courts of Appeal.
In an effort to determine the statewide significance of
each case, the Association formed a Redevelopment Legal
Counsel Advisory Committee to review them and recommend
a course of action to our Board of Directors. The
Legal Committee is composed of: Herbert Weiser, Weiser
Kane Ballmer & Berkman; Andrew C. Hall, Jones Hall Hill
& White; Thomas P. Clark, Stradling Yocca Carlson &
Rauth; Steven Goldfarb, Goldfarb & Lipman; and Joseph
Coomes, McDonald Holland & Allen. The Committee has
recommended Association support of each of these cases
on behalf of all redevelopment agencies in California
by filing supporting briefs and other actions as may be
required.
Our Board of Directors approved the Committee recommen-
dations and has authorized the payment of one-third of
the cost for the necessary legal work from existing
Association funds. The balance of the cost will be
one-third from voluntary contributions of Redevelopment
Agency members and the other one-third to be provided
by the law firms preparing the briefs on behalf of the
Association.
RECEIVED
FEB 2 1 M4
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
n
A brief summary of these cases has been enclosed for
your review. we suggest that you contact members of our
Legal Committee if you or your Agency Legal Counsel have
any questions regarding the issues involved and the
effect these court decisions would have on your
projects.
This letter is to request your Agency's consideration of
a voluntary contribution to assist in financing a
portion of the legal work required. Any excess
contributions will be retained in our legal fund for
future cases of statewide significance.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions
regarding this request.
Sincerely,
ilton R. Farrell
Executive Director
MRF:sj
Enclosure
M
SUMMARY OF CASES
n
There are currently four cases pending in courts of Appeal which
were reviewed by CRA Association's Redevelopment Legal Counsel
Legislative Committee and found to be of statewide significance.
A brief summary of these cases are as follows:
1. Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley, and Santa Ana
Redevelopment Agency v. Brown.
Both cases involve the issue of redevelopment agencies being
exempt from the provisions of Article XIII B (Gann Amendment)
and were filed in Superior Court as a validating action for tax
allocation bond issues.
Despite numerous favorable decisions since SB 1972 was approved
by the Legislature, the Superior Court in the Bell case ruled
that Health & Safety Code Section 33678 is in violation of
Article XIII B. SB 1972 was a CRA Association/League sponsored
bill that provided in Section 33678 t':at tax increment was not
the receipt by an agency of proceeds of taxes levied by or on
behalf of an agency within the meaning of Article XIII B of the
Constitution. During hearings on this bill it was pointed out
that an agency cannot levy a property tax, and that an
appropriations limit would not work since redevelopment
projects start with a zero appropriations base. SB 1972
clarified the issue by in effect exempting agencies from the
provisions of Gann.
If the Bell decision stands, tax allocation financing will be
back to the days following the adoption of Article XIII B when
ratings of a large number of tax allocation bond issues were
suspended. Clearly, tax allocation funding for future redevel-
opment activities would be clouded with uncertainty.
The Santa
received
Ana Case
a favorable
property owner.
is on the same subject. However, it
decision and has been appealed by a
2. Huntinoton Park v. Martin
This case involves the issue of sales tax financing as
authorized under the provisions of SB 152 which was another CRA
Association/League sponsored bill. SB 152 granted redevelop-
ment agencies the power to use existing city sales tax revenues
within project areas for redevelopment purposes and allow them
to be pledged to retire tax allocation bonds. One of the
conditions the legislature placed in this bill was that the
State Board of Equalization could not administer any sales tax
M
M
imposed by a redevelopment agency until an appellate court
makes a determination that this is not a "special tax" within
the meaning of Article XIII A of the California Constitution.
In deciding this issue, the Appellate Court decision language
held that redevelopment agencies are "special districts" which
has extremely far-reaching consequences. This is not a
fundamental issue in this case and both the Bell and Santa Ana
cases currently in the Court of Appeal deal directly with this
issue. Obviously, this is also an important case to all
agencies in California. The California Supreme Court has
granted a hearing.
3. County of Santa Cruz v. Redevelopment Agency of Watsonville
This case was also felt to be of statewide significance. The
circumstances in this case involved a determination by the
agency that it would be desirable to extend an access road from
its industrial project through unincorporated area. The Agency
therefore requested the County to grant extraterritorial
jurisdiction pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33213.
City/Agency officials presented the County Board of Supervisors
with the redevelopment plan and discussed the construction of
the access street. The request was approved by the County
which adopted an ordinance approving the Redevelopment Plan.
This is a 1973 project, and the plan, as is customary, provides
general powers to the Agency including the improvement of
streets within the Project Area.
In July of 1982 the County filed an action against the Agency
to recover tax increment funds used for other street improve-
ments. The County introduced a copy of its minutes which
indicated the Agency, in seeking extraterritorial jurisdiction,
had indicated it was constructing one new street for access
purposes and that it was a "one -project plan".
The trial court held that the Plan was for "one project only"
and that tax increment can be used only for the street
extension project. In short, the Court ignored the General
language empowering the Agency to construct streets as required
for the Project, which is typical in many redevelopment plans
in effect throughout the State, and that all other improvements
financed with tax increment were improper and illegal, although
some were barred from challenge by the Statute of Limitations.
The Court further ordered that following the construction of
the access road in the unincorporated area, the Redevelopment
Plan must be terminated.
This decision is being appealed, but if affirmed it could
threaten redevelopment plans statewide which are drafted in
general terms.
ARCHITECT'S OWNERARCHITCT Li
o
=' FIELD REPORT Co TANT ❑
AIA DOCUMENT G711 fIEL ❑
POUNCIII AGENDA ITEM A 2
• PROJECT: GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CTR. FIELD REPORT NO: 10
CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO81-110CC.52
DATE March 8, 19" 8:30-9:30 WEATHER clear sunny TEMP. RANGE 65-700
EST. % OF COMPLETION 8% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) 3 weeks behind
WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT A
2. Pouring easterly concrete Group W Cable
s a councilwoman Barbara
3 Roilgh eleCtrinal, mpohanical, Councilman Tony Petta
and plumbing continues Bob Stewart, Building Inspector
Seth Armstead, City Manager
OBSERVATIONS Larry Wolff, WLC
1. The Architect instructed the Superintendent to ensure that all con -
:rate spi11 c at gar -on Rd were properly cleaned Ur
2. Probiems remain with the gated entrance at Barton Rd. Sethr s d
rPgn stPd that thp ArnhjtPnf and Cnntrantnr noordinatp with him in
order to solve the remaining problems. An additional man gate may
be the sulation. St:th hidicated that tie is having the sign cit Barton
Rd. changed.
The Arehiteet indieated the request for a credit based upen the m-
ing changes should be ready by the next job meeting.
4- The Architect discussed the co.nstri--tction of the r-Aiu- co-ne-s with
the mason. The radius corners shall receive a continuation of the
same running bond pattern which shalI be constructed in all the otHer
wall-- A stack hnna is not elesi reel • Nn nonsf-ri1nt i nn ini nts shall
occur between the curved segment and the straight segment of the wall.
The ftichitect is aware that small protrusions will occar at the s
of the masonry units simply because straight 16" long units are being
utilized to make a curved segment. The Architect indicated that this
was aeeeptable providing that the walls are censtrueted in a erafts-
manlike manner.
ITEMS TO VERIFY As noted above
INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIREI�s noted above
• ATT,
REPORT BY: IXRRY WOL ; architect AIA
AIA DOCUME G711 • ARCHIT S }fLD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • ® 1972
THE AMERIC INSTITUTE OF ,FCTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 2=6 p9ge of 2 pages
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
FIELD REPORT NO. 10
PAGE 2
5. The excess dirt which Councilman Petta had requested and as noted
under Item 7 of the previous field report has not yet been removed.
Councilman Petta indicated that there was no hurry, but all agreed
that it should be done before the next rainfall.
6. Seth Armstead is going to send the Architect literature on an emergen—
cy stair pulley device for the handicapped.
7. The color and material sample board shall be finished today and pre-
sented at the next job site meeting. The colors and materials shall
then be reviewed for approval at the next Council meeting of March
22, 1984.
8. Seth Armstead also requested that the status of the handicap ramp
and the minor adjustment of the Council seating be brought to the
attention of the Council at the March 22nd meeting.
9. The Architect shall prepare a letter to Roy Taylor indicating that
the City desires to have several independent contractors for Cable
T.V. telephones and the intrusion alarm system to perform their
appropriate installations during the course of construction of the
Civic Center. No Contractors have indicated that 24 hour notice is
all that would be required. It was also indicated by both companies
that they would be responsive and work at nights and/or on weekends
in order to overcome any scheduling problems or non -union problems.
It was also specifically noted that the T.V. Cable people will need
to utilize the plumbing and sewer trenches to run their conduit from
the street stub -out to the building. The Architect shall inform the
Contractor that these trenches shall not be backfilled until the
Cable T.V. has been installed and approved by the Building Inspector.
10. A meeting with Group W was scheduled at 8:OOam Thursday, March 8,
with the Architect and the City Manager.
11. The location of the two drinking fountains in the Foyer #1 was dis-
cussed with the Contractor's Superintendent. The vent stacks and
plumbing cannot be installed in the masonry wall. The Architect indi—
cated that the two drinking fountains could be interchanged with the
location of the pay telephone which would provide a framed wall be-
hind the drinking fountain location. Another alternative would be to
simply provide a wood framed wall behind the drinking fountains for
the required plumbing. The Architect left the choice up to the Con-
tractor's Superintendent.
12• The next regularly scheduled job meeting shall be Wednesday, March
14, 1984 at 8:OOam.
ARCHITEC V5 ARCHITECT ❑
1IFLD REPORT CO TANT ❑ IF
`—_ AIA [)OCUM[NT G711 FIEL� ❑ IYiAR 2 2 1984 11MOLINCIL AGENDA ITEM Z
PROJECT:Grand Terrace Civic Center
CONTRACT:
FIELD REPORT NO: 11
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO. 81-110CC.52
DATE 3-14-84 TIME 8 • 30-11 • 00 WEATHER cloudy/light raiWP RANGE 55-690
EST %. OF COMPLETION 9% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, —) 3 weeks behind
WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE
1. o wor in progress because Group W. Cable
p f rain Cou-nA' l io-m Ea n $ ba DFean h
nrvQz —t z.aaa "7
Bob Stewart, Building Inspector
om scFiwab, Finance Director
T inda 01aratti a Rpnrptary
Seth Armstead, City Manager -
Roy
OBSERVATIONS Ernie Zampese
Larry Wolff, WLC
spi s at Barton Rd. have been cleaned up as noted in the pre-
n genera pu is wi now a roug t through the
property of Zampese and De BPnpAict rather than throilgh the
struction site. Consequently, the large double gates at Barton
Rd. shall always remain locked and no pedestLictn CILUCe-55 shall: 15e
provided. City Manager to request Council approval f a hn1ri harmless clause
or ity s use of Zampese/DeBenedet property.
3 The rad;33� GgrRers shall h
tern with the protrusions of the masonry units equalized at the
ends versus a center poi n running bond pattern shall be
uti l i 7p 3 with wPathererl joints to C.oMpl etel 1 cover -all
ledges of the masonry.
4. The Architect was directed to provide a pair of double doors from
the exterior at the Storage Room No. 28. The Architect shall pre-
Contractor for the additional work. In the meantime the
Arc itect directed the Contractor to set the masonry now in pro -
ITEMS TO VERIFY As noted above
INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED As noted above RECEIVED
ATTACHMENTS `N I
REPORT BY:
LFF./ARchitect AIA
n n .�
n P. _
CITY Or GRAND TERRACE
AIA THE AMERICANTI ITUTE DE ARCH TECE�1135CNE"' ORK AVE ,TNIA EW�IASHHINGTON,, D C 20006 page of page%
FIELD REPORT NO. 11
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
PAGE 2
5. Discussion was given to the concrete mix design for the sono-tube
columns. The smaller 3/8" aggregate will be acceptable if the
quantity of sand in the previously submitted mix is diminished and
if the mix design is prepared by a registered civil or structural
engineer.
6. Group W Cable presented the list of requirements in order to com-
plete the audio and visual needs for the Cable T.V. system in the
project. The Architect shall transmit these needs into a proposal
request for the Contractor to respond to.
7. The color and material sample board for the project was presented
to the Building Committee for their review. Final review is
requested at the scheduled Council meeting of March 22.
8. The Contractor indicated that the two drinking fountains in Foyer
#1 were relocated and interchanged with the location of the pay
telephone as previously noted on the last job report.
9. The next regularly scheduled job meeting shall be Wednesday, March
22, 1984 at 8:30am.
PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL
A G R E E M E N T
The City of Grand Terrace does hereby agree to hold William DeBenedet
and Ernie Zampese harmless from, and will defend, at its own expense
and sole cost, any claim, demand, liability, or loss by reason of any
injury to property or person in connection with the use of access to
City Hall Buildings through property owned by William DeBenedet and
Ernie Zampese during the period of the Civic Center construction.
ATTEST
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
By
9—ay —or
City Clerk Date
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
LM
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MINUTES
PENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL
JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 1,
M. A, R 2 1984
C c 4ivC-/v
00 AGENDA ITEM w). 3
1984
The joint adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace with the Community Redevelopment Agency was called to order at the Terrace
View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand Terrace, California, on
March 1, 1984, at 5:37 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor
Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tony Petta, Councilman
Roy W. Nix, Councilman
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman
Seth Armstead, City Manager
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Myrna Erway, City Clerk
ABSENT: None
The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Nix, followed by the Pledge
of led by Randy Anstine.
FY 1984-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A staff report was distributed at the meeting indicating the projects
and costs which have been completed through February 29, the projects
either under construction or approved for 1983-84, and the proposed
capital improvement projects and funds available for 1983-84 and
1984-85. City Manager Armstead stated as directed, Staff prepared a
revised schedule of estimated revenues and capital improvement
projects either under construction or proposed, as a result of the
Public Workshop Session held February 16, 1984; the revenues have been
adjusted to reflect only available funds, not restricted funds, which
indicates funds are not available to finance the three proposed
projects for FY 1984-85; recommended keeping a $300,000 reserve,
loaning $100,000 to CRA, that the CRA budget $140,000 for classroom
airconditioning and $109,000 for the Vivienda Bridge project, and
postponing the storm drain project until funds become available.
Councilman Rigley stated the budgeting information provided at each
budgeting session varies to the extent that he questions at what point
the information can be considered valid. Councilman Petta felt the
variable information is due to the fact that the consultants
previously felt $700,000 for the Fire Station and the cost of the
civic center land, for a total of nearly one million dollars, could be
included in the civic center financing; however, since that financing
was not available, the City had to pay cash, which would have
otherwise been available to fund capital improvement projects.
Page 1 -
3/1/84
Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated she understood from Bond Counsel the
civic center property was not included in the civic center financing
because the interest rate would be too high, and the fire station
could not be financed because the project was already completed.
Councilman Rigley felt Council made the determination to include the
fire station in the civic center financing and was not advised that
cash was paid. Councilman Nix disagreed that Council was unaware of
the payment for the fire station; felt payment was made sometime ago
with the understanding they would try to include that in the civic
center financing; concurred that the inability to finance that project
affected the funding available for capital improvement projects; felt
the inability to finance the fire station was not adequately
explained.
Councilman Nix felt data needs to be presented outlining the capital
improvement project status from a year ago to the present time which
will show how and why the numbers have changed and what is and is not
included; also feels additional data is needed regarding the statement
to postpone until more financing is available; questioned what the
prospects are of more financing and when it might become available.
City Manager Armstead stated the information which has been presented
reflects only funding which is presently available; indicated pending
long-term financing legislation could provide additional funding; will
advise of the impact of state -mandated programs on the City.
In discussion, Council indicated clarification is needed, since the
information presented is not consistent with that which was previously
presented, and on which previous decisions were based; discussed tax
increment, and the fact that debt must be established in a 12-year
period in order to receive tax increment over a 30-year period. Staff
indicated that the funding recommended to be loaned to CRA would
finance all proposed projects, as listed on Schedule 4 of the Staff
Report, including classroom airconditioning and the Vivienda Bridge
project, does not include storm drains, and would leave a $300,000
reserve.
City Engineer Kicak stated staff has been pursuing a number of
projects in this year's capital improvement program; the storm drain
system has been designed from the lowest end up to Pico and Gage
Canal, which is approximately 65-70% of the total storm drain system;
the cost estimates for this portion exceed the proposed budgeted
amount; recommended deferring further design until the issue is
resolved, and deferring work on other projects not being considered by
Council as viable projects at this time, such as Barton Road/Mt.
Vernon beautification.
Staff was directed to prepare the following information prior to
April, to be presented on a date to be established by Council: (1) a
historical tracking record, in simplified form, such as a pert chart,
of the revenues and expenditures from incorporation to present; (2) a
detailed, substantiated breakdown of the basis used to estimate the
current revenue projections; (3) an interpretation of how each of the
proposed legislative bills, SB 1300 and AB 2468, will affect the
Page 2 -
3/1/84
City's budget, to include the amount of funding the City would receive
and when payment of those funds can be expected; (4) a projection of
CRA revenue and commitments against CRA revenue for the next five
years, based on presently -approved projects; (City Attorney Hopkins
recommended a 12-year projection, since that is the time frame to
incur debt); (5) the impact proposed legislation relative to
state -mandated programs will have on the City; and (6) how soon a
decision must be made to ensure installation of airconditioning in the
classrooms during the summer months.
Mayor Grant opened the meeting to public participation. Danny
Schwier, 22843 Desoto, recommended that staff be better prepared for
the meetings, and that there be more coordination between staff and
Council. Steve Kiacz, 11809 Holly, stated there appears to be a
communication breakdown between staff and Council; felt the various
activities have not been properly monitored; felt a pert chart should
be prepared identifying the sources of state and federal funding and
project development; felt the City should not rely on state and
federal funding.
ADJOURN - The Joint CRA/Council Adjourned Regular Meeting adjourned at
7:12 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held March 8, 1984 at 5:30
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
APPROVED:
Mayor
Page 3 -
3/1/84
PE� DD'r,,
CHE
-� C'
u %aiTY
'4 REGISTER NO. 032284
GRAND TERRACE
COLTI—:'_..,:
,.—?OVAL
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-092 CCU;*�IL AGENDA ITEM 2 t/4 DATE
03/22/84
:HER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
q.
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN
PRINT FLIERS,HIST/CULTUR
10-4804-210
3576
128.69
12011
128,E+9
RANDALL ANSTINE
CHEM.TERF SEM.2/3 RANDY
13-4430-270
46.50
PARK/REC.SEM. 2/24,RANDY
13-4430-270
26.50
LOCAL MILEAGE,RANDY
13-4430-271
21.30
12012
94.30
SETH ARMSTEAD
MARCH/CAPITOL 2/28,SETH
10-4120-270
22.63
LOCAL MILEAGE.SETH
JU-4120-271
20.25
12013
42.90
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
PAY #2 ALL AMERICANd ASPH
18-4c)04-255
5922.59
P3952
5922.59
DEBERRY/PICO/G.T. ROAD
BASTANCHURY BOTTLED 14ATER
BOTTLED 6�ATER,COM.SVCS.
10-4190-238
01200
28.00
BOTTLED AATER,FINANCE
10-4190-238
01251
27.50
BOTTLED WATER,C/M
10-4190-238
01252
18.50
12011
74.00
NAZAREK,HARPER,HOPKINS
LEGAL SERVICES 12/63
10-4160-250
Q51.02
LEGAL 6ERVICES,1/84
10-4160-250
2055.42
1201
3006.441
CALIF. MUNICIPAL TREASURERS
REG.CMTA,4/34 S.JOSE,ScT
10-4120-270
30.011
P3951
30.00
COLTON, CITY OF
N.N.D.SERVICES 3/84
21-4570-802
16607.2u
P3941
18607.241
i
COPY LINE CORP.
i
DEVELOPER FOR COPIERS
10-4190-210
9370
62.36
12016
82.36
DANIEL'S LANDSCAPING SERVIC
PARK MAINT 3/84
13-4430-245
750.00
12ul
750.00
n
GRAND TERRACE
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-092 DATE 03/22/84
.ICHER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
DEF.COMP.P/R END.2/24/84
10-2164-000
578.00
DEF.COMP.P/R END.2/24/84
10-2170-000
26.02
DEF.COMP.P/R END.2/24/84
10-4120-139
576.95
DEF.COtAP.P/R END.2/24/84
10-4125-139
384.62
DEF.COMP.P/R ENO.2/24/84
10-4140-139
514.80
DEF.COOIP.R/R END.2/24/84
10-4180-139
231.95
DEF.COMIP.P/R END.2/24/64
13-4430-139
105.35
DEF.COMP.P/R END.2/24/84
21-4572-139
110.35
P394b
2608.04
BETH DUARTE
STUFFING/N.W.D.BILLING
21-4572-250
82.00
P394
82.00
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT FUND
RETIRE.P/R END.2/24/84
IU-2167-000
31.90
RETIRE.P/R EiVD.2/24/84
10-u120-140
395.26
RETIRE.P/R ENn .2/24/84
10-4125-140
263.50
RETIRE.P/R END.2/24/84
10-4140-140
240.04
RETIRE.P/R END.2/24/84
10-4180-140
158.90
RETIRE.P/R END.2/24/84
13-4430-140
126.98
RETIRE.P/R END.2/24/64
21-4572-140
75.60
P3947
1292.1d
EMPLOYEES SERVICES&HECREATIC
MEMBERSHIP 84,ESRIE,RANO
13-4430-265
60.00
P394
bc.00
MR. TIM ENGLE
',vORK O-'d SHELTER/PARK
13-4430-245
620.0U
INSTALL BOARDS/BLEACHERS
13-4430-246
280.00
P3956
9uo.o0
GRAND TERRACE AREA
4/84-6/84 NEWSLETTER
10-4190-221
5484.00
1201
5484.00
(CHAMBER OF COMMERCE)
IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED
STREET SNEEP.2/28
18-4908-255
40b9
37Q.87
1201.
379.0
GRAND TERRACE
F]
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO
84-092
DATE 03/22/84
CHER
No.
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
LOMA LINDA DISPOSAL
TRASH PICK-UP C/H 3/84
10-4180-245
36.40
TRASH PICK-UP►PARK 3/84
13-4430-245
36.40
12020
72.86-
MICHAEL LUNA
LOCAL NILEAGE,LUNA
10-4180-271
64.48
12021
64.4d
MARANATHA DISKING
DISKING (3 LOCATIONS G.T.16-4900-255
90.Ou
12622
90.00
MUNROE SYSTEMS
RIBBONS FOR CALCULATORS
10-4140-210
7773311
40.27
MAINT.CALCULATOR,2/14/b4
10-4140-246
218767
38.00
12023
78.27
JEAN MYERS
CROSS.GUARD 3/5-3/9/84
17-4910-250
50.86
12o2u
50.8d
PACIFIC BELL
PHONE C/H 2/14
10-4190-235
604.74
12025
6u4.74
'
PETRA ENTERPRISES
PRE INKED STAMP
iu-4140-210
4414
16.01
1202
16.01
PETRA ENTERPRISE-S
CITY ENVELOPES
10-4190-210
4422
176.22
P392"
176.22
RECREATION FLIERS
13-4430-210
4412
294.51
W.N.D.ENVELOPES
21-4572-210
4u21
383.22
P394
677.73
PEOPLE HELPERS INC
REC.SERVICES 2/24-3/9/84
13-4430-250
Aun.ul
12u2
800.411
PETTY-CASH,PEGGY TROTTIER
STAMPS FOR C/M OFFICE
10-4120-210
492
8.00
I
i
i
m
GRAND TERRACE
LJ
PAGE NO
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-092
DATE 03/22/84
CHER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
FILM/CODE ENFORCEMENT
10-4120-249
485
9.81
FILM/CODE ENFORCEMENT
10-4120-249
487
9.81
FILM,CODE ENFORCEMENT
10-4120-249
491
9.81
P.A ADAPTER
10-4125-210
477
1.90
RI68ONS,PROCLAMATIONS
10-4125-210
483
1.59
KEY
10-4125-210
436
1.05
MAP UPDATE
10-4170-250
471
2.65
MAP UPDATE
10-4170-250
480
1.06
SIGN PAINT.
10-4180-245
478
3.16
LArNN SEED C/H
10-4180-245
486
9.54
PACKAGE TAPE
10-4180-245
489
3.46
REPAIR CHAIN SAW
10-4180-246
474
8.00
POSTAGE/CM OFFICE
10-4190-210
475
4.44
FILM/COM.SVCS,
13-4430-210
476
3.60
1202ih
77.88
PETTY-CASH,PEGGY TROTTIER
FILM DEVELOPED/COM.SVCS.
13-4430-210
479
7.35
SHELTER COVER,PARK
13-4430-245
472
2.62
LIGHT BULBS.PARK RESTR00P;13-4430-245
484
3.15
MARKER/5R115H,FOR TRIANGL
1b-4900-220
473
2.4h
HIRE GAUGE
16-4900-220
481
3.5o
BULB FOR LNARNING LIGHT
16-4000-220
490
5.81
RECORDING FEE
18-4930-255
477
4.00
RU88ER STAHP
21-4572-210
482
5.51
1202:
34.41-.1
POSTMASTER/COLTON
POSTAGE/MAIL.MACHINE
10-4190-210
300.Ou
P03TAGE/t4AIL.MACHINE
21-4572-210
700.0r)
P393.
111u0.nG
PU3LIC RISK $ INSURANCE
I,AEMBERSHIP 1984 PRIMA
10-4190-2bO
40044
72.00
12030
72.00
REVENUE SHARING ADVISORY SV
GRANT SEEKERS PUBLICATI0113-4430-210
121�31
1EE.Cu
SAA 30NO CO CENTRAL CR UNIOt
EMPLOYEES DED. P/R 2/24/
10-21b5-000
1507.32
e3941
150.32
SAN 3ERNARDINOpAIJDITOR/C0;1T,
PARK.CITES/i/3-1/31/34 C
IU-2200-000
97.50
12U3
97.5C
(COUNTIES PORTION)
GRAND TERRACE
M
PAGE NO.
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO
84-092
DATE 03/22/84
i41ER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNTCHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
SHERIFF FLOYD TIDNELL
LAA ENFORCEMENT/3/84
10-4410-256
32249.00
P3941-
32249.00
SAv BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF
DUMP CHARGES 1/17-2/14/8
1b-4900-253
842
39.60
DUMP CHARGES 1/17-2/14/8
18-4908-253
842
159.95
12u33
194.55
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK
MEET.COLTON,2/17/84 SETH
10-4120-270
22.72
12034
22.72
SOUTHERN CALIFORINA EDISION
STREET LIGHTS (3) 10/82—
16-4510-238
458.73
12035
458.73
TIGER SYSTEMS
RENT STORAGE BIN 3/84
10-4110-240
10u921
bO.00
1203t
b0.00
S & 'W PLASTICS STORES,INC.
NAME TAGS,EOC COMMITTEE
10-4808-220
963
27.03
12037
27.03
VERTICAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
PARK.CITES PROCESS.1/31/j10-4412-255
84002
130.50
1203-
13u.50
WATTEABARGER'S OFFICE SUPPLY
GLUE STICKS►STAPLES
10-4120-210
2971
GLUE STICKS,STAPLES
10-4125-210
2971
6.90
PE;NCILS,CALENDAR,GI;9BER
10-4140-210
2971
25.33
CREDIT IAVOICE #2647
10-4140-210
2647
2.67
120i
36.9b
ZNMPESE & DE BENEDET
RENT,C/H 4/84
10-4190-242
625.Ou
1204(
625.00
FEDERAL EXPRESS
AIR EXPRESS/GRANT APPLIC
13-4430-220
86025
2b.50
12041
26.50
GRAND TERRACE
P1
F]
PAGE NO
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO.
84-092
DATE 03/22/84
O ER
PAYEE
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WARRANT CHECK
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO.
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
D. CHRISTENSEN
w.'w.D.REFUND,CHRISTENSEN
21-3114-000
11.41
12042
11.41
KATHERINE JACOBSEN
w.A.D.REFUND,JACOSSEN
21-3114-000
11.20
12043
11.20
CATHY RINGNES
4V.w.D.OVERPAYMENT,RINGNES21-3114-000
82.44
P3944
82.44
PAYROLL
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-2161-000
1375.48
PAYROLL ENDUNG 2/24/84
10-21b2-000
225.82
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
1v-2163-000
102.99
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-2164-000
578.00
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-2165-000
1507.32
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
1�-2167-000
31.90
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-2170-000
26.02
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-4120-110
3187.5b
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
IQ-4125-110
2125.02
PAYROLL ENUING 2/24/84
10-4140-110
3214.71
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
10-41b0-110
1281.48
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
13-4430-110
1024.01
PAYROLL ENDING 2/24/84
21-4572-110
609.68
0
75-90.931
I
i
i
i
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
n
GRAND TERRACE
u
PAGE NO
DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 84-092
DATE 03/22/84
PAYEE
WARRANT CHECK
CHER
DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED
WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT CHG'D
INV NO
AMOUNT
NO
AMOUNT
V%RITTEN
13841.61
PREPAID
72785.69
ACCRUED
.00
TOTAL
86627.3v
RECAP BY FUND
PRE —PAID
'ARITTEN
FUND
10
43621.72
107b8.2°
FUND
13
2590.85
18513.33
FUND
16
.00
600.18
FUND
17
.00
SC.Bs
FUND
16
5g22.59
543.c2
FUND
21
20650.5S
26.?2
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE, lHE
AFO
ELISTED CHECKS
FOR PAYMENT
OF CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY
ME AND ARE NECESS
RY AND
APPROPRIATE EX
ENDIT
RES FOR THE i
OPERATION OF THE CITY.
ar
. /./�QJ ✓�ti L'
THOMAS J. SCHWABt-
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
OFFICER
I
i
i
r
SloAFF REPQoRT
12_2.1021�
C R A ITEX ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (x ) PE ETING DATE: Mar. 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: Release of Road Improvement Bond, Minor Subd. 78-0321
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDIN;; REQUIRED x
The installation of street improvements was required as a condition of minor subd.
78-0321 by the County of San Bernardino. The project is located as 22365 Barton
Road. All improvements have been installed to the City Engineer's satisfaction.
A bond in the amount of $2,900.00 is being held by the San Bernardino County
Surveyor's Office.
Staff recommends that City Council:
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO INSTRUCT THE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE TO RELEASE
SAID BONDS.
BMS/JK/lbk
Attachment
Plot Pla r►�or SuuuAvibLu[1/l.uJ�At:uOILe
'i•his AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
31st
day of
Auqust , 1978 , by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, State
of California, hereinafter called the "COUNTY", and Ray Keeney and
l
Robert F'. ueenev hereinafter called the'"OWNER". ►
WITNESSETH
FIRST: That the OWNER for and in consideration of the permission granted
by the COUNTY to construct certain improvements within public rights of way in
that certain Parcel known as Minor Subdivision No. 78-0321 �
hereby agrees at his (its) own cost and expense, to furnish all required equip-
ment, labor and material, and before the expiration of two years from the date
hereof, to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner the following
work and improvements, to wit: Construct road improvements on Barton Road
in Grand Terrace. Said construction shall include;l 50.-linear feet of
curb and gutter; one driveway approach; 520 square feet of sidewalk; engineering
and staking; all necessary grading and paving. Permit fees shall conform
to the "Curb and Gutter Policy" adoated by the Board of Supervisors.
in accordance with the San Bernardino County Standard Drawings ana ,)peci_icdcicns,
and do all work incidental thereto. Said Standard Drawings and Specifications are
on file in the office of the Director of Transportation, and are hereby =de a
part of this agreement, and said work and improvements shall be done under the
supervision and to the satisfaction of said Director of Transportation. D`w;:.R
hereby agrees to pay for all inspection of the work as required by the COUNTY. The
estiTated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of TWO THOUSAND NINE
HIS;DRED & no/190--------------------- 2 900.00 )
Dollars ($
SECOND: The COUNTY, the Director of Transportation and all officers and
employees of the COUNTY shall not be accountable in any manner for any loss of or
damage to the work or any part thereof; for any of the materials or equipment used
or employed in performing the work; for any injury to any person or persons, either
workmen or anyone employed by him; or for any injuries or damages to person and
property the (YWNER or his contractor having control over such work must properly
guard against.
THIRD: The OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, the Director
of Transportation and all officers and employees of the COUNTY :rom all suits or
actions of every name, kind, or description brought for, or as a result of any
injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, by or from the
his contractor or agents or employees of them, in the performance of the
work l►erein,
FOL'iKTII: It is further agreed that the 019N R wi l: ::t JiTnes, up to the comple-
and acceptance of said work or improver„n_nts, zit,; :,:1 znd c6ecunte yarning to
Lraveling public of every defective and dangerouc cuodi,ton e:cistent within public
tints of way, and will protect the traveling pui.lic I•ro.1, s id '.cze=aouu conditions.
is understood and agreed that until the completiG:i, Of -Li -.cgX're-: i-provernents,
he subject road or roads shall not be accepted into the County :'iaintai.ned Road System.
O1%'1ZR may, with approval of the Director of Trans pert-itirn, clone :.li or portions of
any street when deemed necessary to protect the trr.vcli.r1,^, pt,bl.:c Burin; the construc-
tion and/or installation of the required improvements.
FIFTH: It is further agreed by the parties hereto, tliat. tine GNMZR will furnish
good and sufficient bonds in an amount not less than: the cGtirlutLd cost of said work
and improvements as specified herein for the pa;meii.t: bile; faithful performance of the
terms and conditions of this contract. Said bonds m7;,y 1),- in one or :ore of the follow-
ing forms: (1) cash deposit, (2) bond by one or mcrc duly suthorized corporate sure-
ties, (3) instrument of credit from one or more finLnc_ial i.nstitutiors subject to
regulation by the State or Federal government pledgi.r�S that the funds necessary to meet
the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for peyr::nt: 3ttd agreeing that the funds
designated by the instrument shall become trust furdc for ti,e purpoees as set forth
above. Should said securities become insufficient,' ?[':?:i: agrees to provide supple-
mental surety as required within ten days of notifi.cet:ion. All bonds shall remain its
full force and effect until all work is completed cLu :.ccepLed )Y the COUI%:Y.
SIXTH: It is further agreed by and between, ti•IL parties herztc, including the
surety or sureties on the bonds attached to this a�rean,ci:t, that in the event it is
deemed necessary to extend the allowable construction ti:nz� frr tile completion of the
work as required under this agreement said extensionicc;' bu granL:e6 or denied by the
Board of Supervisors and such action shall in no ve, affect: Lire v;:'_idi y of this agree-
ment or release the surety or sureties on the bonds rttschea hereto.. In the event of
such extension of time for completion of the work req:.ire3 hcreundcr, the County may
re -estimate the value of incompleted work based unit prices and adjust
bond amounts accordingly as required, and in the evcat- chZi. ri,e CO *,, Y brings suit
af;ainst 01,41N .R for alleged non-compliance with this and judgment is recovered,
shall pay all costs incurred by COUNTY in b::.gi='; shell suit-, including a reason-
able attorney's fee, to be affixed by the court.
A.7nST.
Clerk of the Board of the
County of San Bernardino
A(D
heirratCoij OF
By _t� �u ci ciie B()ard c`-. Supervisors
SEP 18 1978
il<<z�tt�e f t'rin al)
TO: GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MAR 2 1984
FROM: CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE A�
DATE: January 16 , 19 84 COUNCIL AGENDA I ��E��1 4: � w
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M.
11DSERS PRESENT:
Joe Ramos
Jim Hodder
Susan Crawford
GUESTS:
Joe Frink, Sheriff's Department
Minutes of the January 3, 1984 meeting were read and approved.
Joe Ramos advised the Committee that Mr. Jim Brown of "WE TIP"
would address the Committee on February 6, 1984 on the "WE TIP"
program. The Committee invited Mr. Brown to a meeting so the
Committee would have more information upon which to make a recommen-
dation to the Council on whether or not the City should participate
in the program.
Detective Frink advised the Committee on his progress in locating
a suitable presentation certificate for the citizens award presen-
tation ceremony planned for the near future.
Detective Frink also informed the Committee of recent criminal
activity in Grand Terrace.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:21 P.M.
The next meeting is scheduled for February 6, 1984 at 7:00 A.M.
Re,spectf lly submitted,
1
c�------
i
;.doe Ramos
Secretary
RECEIVED
EmmaN,52.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
uaLe: March 14, 1984
12.234
STDAFF
REPr1%x q-
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: March 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. ",
Adoption of Land Use Element — General Plan Amendment
SUBJECT:
f/ Funding Required
(See report on consultant)
No Funding Required
At their regular meeting of March 8, 1984 City Council directed the staff
to bring before the Council Land Use Element for Public Hearing and
Adoption. The public hearing has been properly noticed and in accordance
with the direction of the City Council, each property owner speaking before
the City Council on this matter at the regular meeting of February 23, 1984
has been notified (certified mail) of what staff perceived to be City
Council's intent on this matter. Attached is a list of property owners and
a copy of a letter forwarded to them.
In addition, the newspapers have received an announcement of this matter,
requesting that it be published in a form of a news release.
Staff Recommends that City Council:
1. ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION
2. DIRECT STAFF TO INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO LAND USE
ELEMENT THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION
JK:dlk
Attachments
PENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CA., CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE UPDATED
GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE;
APPROVING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE UPDATED
GENERAL PLAN; AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS.
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has prepared an Updated General
Plan for the City of Grand Terrace and wishes to proceed with the adoption of
the Land Use Element, pursuant to the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace has
submitted a Resolution approving and recommending adoption of the Updated
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and
completed pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, commencing with
Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does
hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals - That the above recitals are all true and
correct.
SECTION 2. Draft EIR - That, with respect to said Draft EIR, this
City Council does hereby find and determine:
(a) That a Notice of Preparation of an environmental impact report has
been given in the time, form, and manner required by CEQA and
State EIR Guidelines;
(b) That said Draft EIR has been prepared, completed, and public
notice given in the time, form, and manner required by CEQA and
State EIR Guidelines;
(c) That said Draft EIR has been submitted for public review and
comment in the time, form, and manner required by CEQA and State
EIR Guidelines;
(d) That a public hearing has been noticed and held on said Draft EIR
as recommended by CEQA and State EIR Guidelines;
(e) That no public agency, organization, or interested person has
requested an extension of time to review and comment on said Draft
EIR within the time specified in the Notice of Review and Comment.
SECTION 3. Final EIR - That, with respect to the Final EIR on said
General Plan Update, t i—fis -Mity Council does hereby find and determine:
(a) That said Final EIR has been prepared and completed in the form
and manner required by CEQA and State EIR Guidelines;
n
(b) That the only significant effects on the environment identified in
said Final EIR will occur as a result of the Updated General Plan;
(c) That certain measures to mitigate or avoid said significant
effects have been specified in said Final EIR;
(d) That, subject to the mitigation measures, said Plan will not have
a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 4. Certification of Final EIR - That this City Council does
hereby certify that said Final as been completed in compliance with CEQA
and State EIR Guidelines and that this City Council does hereby further
certify that it was reviewed and the information contained considered prior to
approval of said Plan.
SECTION 5. Mitigation Measures - This City Council does hereby
approve said Mitigation Measures and finds and determines that said Plan as
conditioned by said Mitigation Measures will not have a significant effect on
the environment.
SECTION 6. Approval of Land Use Element - That this City Council does
hereby approve the Land Use Element of the Updated General Plan and directs
the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination on said Land Use Element with
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino.
ADOPTED this 22nd day of March, 1984.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City Council
thereof.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
_2_
March 14, 1984
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear
HUGH J. GRANT
Mayor
JIM RIGLEY
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Members
TONY PETTA
ROY W. NIX
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
SETH ARMSTEAD
City Manager
MYRNA ERWAY
City Clerk
EDWARD R. CLARK
Finance & Administrative
Services Officer
12.234
At their regular meeting of Feburary 23, 1984 City Council considered
adoption of an Ammendment to City's General Plan. You appeared before the
City Council at that time and voiced an opposition to the proposed
ammendment, stating that insufficient notice has been given to you on this
matter.
City Council at that meeting directed the staff to return the General Plan
Ammendment document to Planning Commission for further hearing.
Subquently, at their meeting of March 8, 1984 City Council heard from the
property owners who have been awaiting the adoption of this plan and have
been involved in the process since last summner. These property owners
stated that the additional delays in adopting this plan are causing them an
undue hardship in proceeding with their project, which have been in
planning stages for several months.
For that reason, the City Council to provide for the concerns of all, has
directed the staff to do the following:
1. Schedule a Public Hearing on the General Plan Ammendment, Land
Use Element only for their regular meeting of March 22, 1984. At
that time they will consider the adoption of that element only,
as it is now proposed. This is primarily to accomodate those
that have experienced delays in their projects. As a result
a Public Hearing will be held at 7:30 p.m. on March 22, 1984
Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road.
Your attendance at that meeting is encouraged.
2. Return the balance of the General Plan Ammendment to the
Planning Commission for further hearings and immediately
—1--
22795 BARTON ROAD CITY MANAGER - CITY CLERK (714) 824-6621
GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 FINANCE - COMMUNITY SERVICES (714) 824-7226
ENGINEERING - PLANNING (714) 825-3825
March 14, 1984 Page 2
INNITIATE AN AMMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT (IF
ADOPTED ON MARCH 22, 1984 ) TO RESPOND TO YOUR CONCERNS.
3. After additional hearings before the Planning Commission
and the City Council, the two bodies will then incorporate
into a new plan the concerns that are expressed during
these hearings, prior to the adoption of the ammended
General Plan.
Your attendance at the Meeting of the City Council on March 22, 1984 and of
course the future meetings of both the Planning Commission and City council
would be very much appreciated.
The next meeting of the Planning Commission when an ammendment to the
General Plan will be considered is scheduled for April 2, 1984 at 7:00 p.m.
at Terrace View Elementary School.
Very truly yours,
JOSEPH KICAK
City Engineer
JK:dlk
cc: Seth Armstead, City Manager
PROPERTY OWNERS
Mr. Frances Carter
11938 Arliss Drive
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Barney Karger
11668 Bernardo Way
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Lee Swertfeger
12438 Michigan
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Max Archer
22064 Van Buren
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Kenneth Parrett
22888 Grand Terrace Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Bob Zambergen
22006 Barton Raod
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Fernando Bijorquez
22238 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mrs. Alma Guerke
22780 Grand terrace Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mrs. Marylou Williams
22270 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Mr. Bernie Barrad
11669 Bernardo Way
Grand Terrae, CA 92324
Mr. Bill Darwin
23172 Palm Avenue
Redlands, CA 92373
12.234
r'iarcn 14, lJ04
T 12-"'
8.3028 IDA F F R E P %rj'WnNN
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: March 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
Public Hearing on Planning Commission Determination -
SUBJECT:
Sign Variance 22365 Barton Road
Funding Required ✓ No Funding Required
At the regular meeting of March 8, 1984 the City Council set a Public
Hearing on the above appeal for March 22, 1984.
At that time the staff submitted to the City Council a report which had
been previously presented to the Planning Commission.
It is respectfully requested that the members of the City Council bring
with them a staff report, on add on item 6A1 from their meeting of March 8,
1984.
Staf recommends:
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER PUBLIC HEARING MAKE A DETERMINATION ON THE
APPEAL
JK:dlk
STAFF REPQRT
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) hCETING DATE: MARCH 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. % C-
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 73 - PROPERTY MAINTENANCE AND LITTER ABATEMENT
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
At the Council meeting held on March 8, 1984, City Council approved the first
reading of an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 73 to agree with the provisions
of the State Vehicle Code in regard to covered loads. Council is asked to bring
their copy of the Staff Report from that meeting (Item 7A, March 8, 1984).
Staff recommends that the Council:
SUBSEQUENT TO PUBLIC HEARING, ADOPT THE SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY.
TC:lo
*:
Date: March 14, 1984
SYAFF REPCY n., T 12.273 ,
12.259
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: March 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 P'
SUBJECT: FY 1984-85 Community Development Block Grant Program
X
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
The San Bernardino County Office of Community Development (OCD) is in the
process of soliciting CDBG Projects for FY 1984-85. The City's FY 1984-85
allocation of CDBG funds will be $32,117.00 which should become available
July 1, 1984. There is presently a balance of FY 1983-84 CDBG funding in the
amount of $15,225.58 that will be carried over to FY 1984-85.
The reason these funds are being carried over into next fiscal year, is
because the school district preferred that the construction take place during
the summer months, so that the school sessions and traffic circulation would
not be interrupted.
The estimated revenues and estimated project costs should read as follows:
CDBG REVENUES
FY 1984-85 $32,117.00
FY 1983-84 (c/o) $15,225.58
$47,342.58
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT
Construction $39,000.00
Soils Report $ 1,700.00
Engineering $ 6,700.00
(Includes design,
surveying, inspection
and Administration)
4)4/,4UU.UU
Based on the Engineer's estimate, the parking lot project will consume all
the CDBG funds; however, the City Council should consider selecting one or
two other projects, if the parking lot is bid under the Engineer's estimate
or additional funds become available.
The City Council should consider and prioritize the following eligible
activities which were are based on the September 23, 1983 Federal Regulations
and the attached target area as determined by the 1980 Census Income Data.
1. Community Center Parking Lot.
2. Land Acquisition for low -to -moderate income housing.
3. Provide public services such as employment, crime prevention,
-1-
11
child care, health, drug abuse, education, energy conservation,
welfare, or recreational needs. This service shall not exceed
(10%) of City's entitlement grant, which in the City's case
will total an amount NOT TO EXCEED $3,211.70.
4. Finance the rehabilitation of privately owned buildings and
improvements.
5. Code Enforcement - Code enforcement in deteriorating areas,
where such enforcement together with public improvements,
rehabilitation, and services may help arrest the decline of
the area.
6. Historic Preservation - A building must be on State or local
inventory of historic places in order for it to be eligible
for rehabilitation.
7. Economic Development - Eligible activities include:
a. The acquisition, construction, reconstruction or
installation of commercial, industrial buildings,
structures, and other real property, equipment and
improvements.
Staff recommends that the City authorize the staff to:
1. RESUBMIT THE COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT CDBG APPLICATION FOR
FY 1984-85, AS THE CITY'S NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.
2. SUBMIT ONE OF THE ABOVE -MENTIONED PROJECTS AS PRIORITY
NUMBER TWO.
3. REQUEST SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OCD TO CARRY-OVER AND TRANSFER THE
BALANCE OF FY 1983-84 CDBG FUNDS TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER
PARKING LOT FY 1984-85.
JK:dlk
-2-
2-7
E
MST
Uy-
5,T�
C--
vnw CW OR
MOP I jI 010 RANCH jI, I
uoppl� CE.rfit
cr
A. alsofil - a - PI 1`6
is, c sit. cr.211.
Ll
rn, ci Ty
rem co"'WERCEN
NE ST
7
AL
as
UNI\
,d
cr
ST
51
HtgrLl Si
11-fS
ST
/ty
-.,BE
SILAFF REPORT
r1Ci1 C:11 1Y1 1 7 0 q
12.234
54W.
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE: March 22, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT: General Plan Update Consulting Services
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
As directed by the City Council we have contacted Beland and Associates
Inc. to determine what costs the City would incur in revising the completed
General Plan Update.
Attached you will find the letter dated March 6, 1984 in which Mr. Beland
proposes to review the Geneal Plan process as it occured during recent
admendment and to prepare the reports necessary for the Planning Commision
as well as the City Council.
The costs for that service is estimated at $2,400.00. He is willing to
amend Section 9 of the existing agreement after the determination has been
made with respect to the scope of work for any changes that may result from
the above reports.
Staff recommends:
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURES OF $2,400.00 TO RECEIVE
INPUT FROM THE CONSULTANT AND IF NECESSARY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE CONSULTANT
THE ADDITIONAL COSTS THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE DESIRED END
RESULT FROM CRA PROFESSIONAL SCRVICES, LIH ITEM 22-4200-250 LEAVING A
BALANCE OF $1,300.
JK: DLK
n
Beland/Assocletes, Inc. Comprehensive Urban Planning / Community Development / Environmental Analysis
C 143.1
March 6, 1984
Mr. Joe Kicak
City Engineer/Planning Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Dear Mr. Kicak:
Per your request, we have reviewed the status of the Grand Terrace
General Plan Update Program to determine how we might assist the City
with the adoption of the Plan.
Review of the chronology of the Update Program, as listed in Attachment
"A", indicates that substantial effort has already been made to fully in-
form property owners about the proposed General Plan. Indeed, I cannot
recall other programs where a comparable per -capita effort has occurred.
However, if there are concerns which have not been brought forward
during the eight months the draft General Plan has been available, then
they should be addressed and resolved as soon as possible.
Our assessment of the situation, based upon information received to date,
suggests that additional meetings with City staff, the Planning Commission
and City Council, plus contact with various property owners, would be
helpful.
Accordingly, I suggest that our existing Agreement for Services, as
dated 3/28/83, be amended re Section 9- Additional Services, to include
the following work tasks:
Task "A"- Review and Analysis of Draft General Plan Land Use Policies:
Review minutes of Council Meeting of January 5, 1984, and
discuss with City staff to determine major issues of concern
to property owners. Define issues in written letter report.
Determine affected/concerned property owners and contact
them to amplify their concerns with respect to issues of land
use policy.
Review findings with City staff. Prepare letter report for
transmittal by City staff to City Planning Commission and
City Council. (Report to state conclusions and proposed
options re land use policy of the Draft General Plan and how
to proceed.) Submittal by March 23, 1984.
Singer Building, Suite 204, 16 S Oakland Avenue, Pasadena, California 91101 (213) 796-8093
8sland//►ssodsMs„ k+c.
Mr. Joe Kicak, page two.
Task "B"- Meet with City Planning Commission (April 2, 1984) to re-
view letter report, discuss options, respond to Commission
questions.
Following Planning Commission action, meet with City staff
to review situation, then prepare letter report to City
Council with recommendations for action re adoption of
General Plan.
I would estimate that Task "A" will involve about three days effort, in-
cluding meetings, and a budget of $1, 200. Task "B", which could be
optional, will also require about three days effort and a budget of $1, 200.
Should additional work be required to revise the existing Draft General
Plan document as a result of these efforts and/or Commission or Council
actions, we would need to re-examine the situation at the appropriate
time.
As always, we are eager to help you complete this program as quickly
and efficiently as possible. Please advise if you have any questions or
desire additional information.
Sinc ,
R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP
President
RDB /sw
Enclosure: Attachment "A"- General Plan Chronology and List of Property
Owners Contacted.
Bland/As*ocWWe, Mc.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE- GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM
PARTIAL CHRONOLOGY
7/14/83- City Council meeting- Status report on General Plan Update
Program. Direction to send notices to affected property
owners.
8/9/83- Written notice sent to 60+ owners per list taken from County
Assessor's roll.
8/15/83- Draft General Plan document delivered to City.
8/18/83- Meeting with property owners at City Hall. Sixteen persons
in attendance. Several others called by telephone.
8/22/83- Report submitted to City- "Property Owners' Review of Draft
General Plan Land Use Policies". (Only item at issue relates
to Wilden Pump and Engineering Company property.)
9/16/83- Planning Commission accepts Draft General Plan and passes
resolution recommending adoption by City Council.
12/2/83- Response to City staff questions about Draft General Plan.
1/5/84- Special Joint Meeting of Planning Commission and Council/
Agency. Public hearing on General Plan Update. Council
accepted General Plan as presented subject to further review
of owners' concerns by Planning Commission.
SToAFF REPOJRT �
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X;;) MEETING DATE: 3-22-84
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9A
SUBJECT: Phase III Report - Cultural Plan - San RPrnardinn Cnunt)�
Arts Leaaue
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
The subject report was circulated to Council, the
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee, and
to "Theatre on the Terrace, with no comments.or
input received.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL:
DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A LETTER FOR THE MAYOR'S
SIGNATURE ADVISING THE REPORT HAS BEEN REVIEWED
AND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE UPDATE.
ME
�0 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ARTS LEAGUE
�L
February 27, 1984
Dear Mayor Grant and members of the City Council:
The county of San Bernardino has been a participant in the
California Arts Council's State/Local Partnership Program since
1980. We have developed a cultural plan for the citizens of
this county and continue to provide services to the citizens
based on this plan.
The California Arts Council's State/Local Partnership Program
requires that one copy of all documents prepared for the program
must be sent to all incorporated cities within the participating
County, and that the County Board of Supervisors must approve
the plan by resolution.
Attached is a copy of the current plan update prepared by the San
Bernardino County Arts League under the State/Local Partnership
Program. We are providing this copy to you for your review and
comment. The plan will then be sent to the Board of Supervisors
and to the California Arts Council for their approval.
We would appreciate hearing from you within the next thirty (30)
days, if you have any statements you wish to make about this document
or the Partnership Program. Your comments will be forwarded to
the Board of Supervisors and to the California Arts Council.
If we do not receive any statements, we will assume that you
approve of this update, and will continue with our local approval
process. We look forward to working with you and your constituents
in this Partnership Program, which is designed to strengthen local
cultural planning and decision making and to reach previously
underserved constituencies through the arts.
Sincerely,
14-t .cam
Oandra Rowe RECEIVED
Executive Director
SR/mjs
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
P.O. BOX 1415 • SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92402 • (714) 885-4266
OFFICE AT- 175 WEST 5TH STREET, 3RD FLOUR