The URL can be used to link to this page

10/25/1984_.4 / z "CITY OF GRAND TERRACE�� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING = AGENDA TERRACE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCH06L 22731 Grand Terrack-load * Call to Order * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call Staff CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Recommendations 1. Approval of Minutes (10/11/84) Approve 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA102584 Approve 3. Economic Development Status Report (Oral Report by RSG) 4. Attendance Approval - CRA Assoc. Redevelopment Approve Seminar in San Francisco ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Add/Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Canine Prgm. (Officer & Dog) B. Community Crime Resistance Grant - Crime Prevention Officer (Oral Presentation) 3. Civic Center Construction Briefing 4. Approval of Minutes (10/8/84) (10/11/84) Approve 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. OCTOBER 25,=1984 5:30 P.M. Council Action �1 t EO F] COUNCIL AGENDA 16/25/84 - Page 2 of 3 A.,Approval of Check Register No. 102584 B. Reject Liability Claim No. GTLC 84-4 Staff Recommendations Approve Approve C. Adopt the Negative Declaration, Approve Approve SA 84-7 Including the Findings & Conditions & Direct City Clerk to File Notice of Determination for Buffer Zone Variance at 22181 Barton Rd. 6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 7. ORAL REPORTS A. Planning Commission B. Parks & Recreation Committee C. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee (1) Library Committee D. Crime Prevention Committee E. Emergency Operations Committee F. Police Chief G. Fire Chief H. City Engineer I. City Attorney J. City Manager K. City Council 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Barton/Palm Realignment B. Sign Code Amendment 9. NEW BUSINESS A. CSA 38 Lease Agreement B. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Approve 1st Reading OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE & Set 2nd Reading AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL & Public Hearing PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984 (AREA 1) for 11/8/84 (First Reading) C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Approve 1st Reading OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE & Set 2nd Reading AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL & Public Hearing PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984 (AREA 2) for 11/8/84 (First Reading) Council Action` G V COUNCIL AGENDA Staff 10/25/84 - Page 3 of 3 Recommendations Council Action D.-AN-ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Approve 1st Reading OF GRAND TERRACE, CA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE & Set 2nd Reading AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL & Public Hearing PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984 (AREA 26B-1) for 11/8/84 (First Reading) E. Omnitrans Joint Powers•Agreement Amendments (1) Designation of General Manager as Treasurer & Director of Accounting as Controller (2) Section 3.B, Weighted Ballot, Based on Population (ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1984, AT 5:30 P.M AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 11/8/84 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 12:00 NOON ON 10/31/84. PCtv1)1NG CRA APPROVAL i 1- 1-10 Pig: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 11, 1984 The regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 11, 1984, at 5:35 p.m. PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Chairman Jim Rigley, Vice Chairman Tony Petta Roy W. Ni x Barbara Pfennighausen Seth Armstead, Executive Director Thomas J. Schwab, Treasurer Ivan Hopkins, Attorney Ilene Dughman, Acting Secretary ABSENT: Myrna Erway, Secretary MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 27, 1984 CRA-84-116 Motion by Mr. Nix, Second by Mrs. Pfennighausen, All Ayes, to approve the Minutes of September 27, 1984, as presented. CHECK REGISTER 110. CRA101184 CRA-84-117 Motion by Mrs. Pfennighausen, Second by Mr. Rigley, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. CRA101184, as presented. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STATUS REPORT Treasurer Schwab advised the draft of the letter to property owners is completed and will be mailed October 15. Contact with Forest City Properties Realtor ruled out, at this time, the feasibility of a master plan for commercial development, since access and site assembly would be required; appears that site or strip development will have to be relied upon. The City of Colton was approached relative to obtaining contacts for developers in this area; will provide the Agency with a list, which is being prepared by the consultant, of developers currently being contacted. CITY AERIAL PHOTOS Community Services Director Anstine stated the contract with Traffic Safety Engineers, Inc., for Traffic Safety Device Inventory, includes their furnishing reproducible black and white aerial photographs showing locations of all the City's traffic control safety devices; Section aerial color prints, which would provide more clarity and be Page 1 - CRA - 10/11/84 0 M more useable, can be purchased at a reduced cost if taken at the same time. Staff is requesting authority to purchase 22 sectional aerial prints of the City. Treasurer Schwab clarified Staff's recommendation for funding is to transfer $6,000 from the Air Condition Classroom project, which cost $40,000 less than what was appropriated, leaving a surplus; that surplus would eventually be transferred to unappropriated surplus. Planning Director Kicak felt the proposed sectional color photos would be of value to the Planning Commission in areas already developed; however, additional expenditures would be required to keep them current as certain areas develop. Chairman Grant and Mrs. Pfennighausen objected to using those funds, feeling they should be reserved in event there is a need to air condition another school. CRA-84-118 Motion by Mr. Petta, Second by Mr. Nix, to approve Staff's recommendation to transfer $6,000 from CRA Project 4946-255, Air Condition Classroom, to a project number for the purpose of obtaining City areial photographs, carried 3-2, with Chairman Grant and Mrs. Pfennighausen voting NOE. ADJOURN - The regular meeting adjourned at 5:56 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held October 25, 1984, at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Acting ecretary APPROVED: Chairman Page 2 - CP,A 10/11/84 PENDING CPA APPR0VA1; COT 2 5 1984 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CRA A(;E,•;JA 11EiM NO. ,2 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE OCT. 25, 1984 CHECK REGISTER NO.CRA102584 CHECK NO. OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF OCT. 25, 1984 *(1) P1437 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. PAYMENT #2 ON AIR CONDITIONING SCHOOL (ARROW AIR CONDITIONING PROGRESS PAY.) $45,112.27 (2) P1438 HUGH GRANT AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE OCT. 1984 150.00 (3) P1439 JAMES RIGLEY AGENCY DIRECTORS! FRINGE OCT. 1984 150.00 (4) P1440 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN MEDICAL INS.,PETTA & DEF.COMP.,NIX OCT. 1984 200.00 (5) P1441 ROY NIX AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE OCT. 1984 100.00 (6) P1442 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN AGENCY DIRECTORS' FRINGE OCT. 1984 150.00 (7) P1443 CRABTREE,KARLIN & ARZ00 FINAL BILLING FOR F/Y 83/84 AUDIT INCLUDING RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE FINANCING PROGRAM 2,900.00 (8) P1444 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. SEPTEMBER BILLING FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1,297.50 TOTAL: $50,059.77 PI I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER *CHECK RELEASED PRIOR TO CHECK REGISTER APPROVAL a 0 D10.17as STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM (XX)) COUNCIL ITEM AGLNDA ITEM NO. I_.__ FUNDING REQUIRED xxx NO FUNDING REQUIRED METING DATE: Oct. 25, 1984 The Community Redevelopment Agencies Association will be presenting the third annual Redevelopment Seminar on November 15, 1984 at the San Francisco Airport Hilton. To be included in the one day seminar are redevelopment in California under new AB203 procedures, redevelopment reform, project implementation, and current methods of redevelopment financing. The Seminar does not require an.overnite stay. Cost would be $260.00 registration and $336.00 air fare for two staff members to attend. Funds are available in the C.R.A. Administration Conference Account #22-4200-270. Staff Recomends: COUNCIL AUTHORIZE AGENCY DIRECTOR, SETH ARMSTEAD, AND AGENCY TREASURER, THOMAS SCHWAB, TO ATTEND THE REDEVELOPMENT SEMINAR NOVEMBER 15, 1984 AT THE SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT HILTON. SIAFF C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X ) MEETING DATE: 10-25-84 AGENDA ITEM NO- 2A & 2B SUBJECT: 2A r San Bernardino County Sheriff's Canine Program 2B - Community Crime Resistance Grant - Crime Prevention Officer FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED 2A - Capt. Bradford will outline the Sheriff's Canine Program and will introduce the Officer and the dog. 2B - Capt. Schuyler will make,an oral presentation regarding the Community Crime Resistance Grant and Crime Prevention Officer. P-i E ` t � r OWNER ®❑ ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT- ❑ 1�84 FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT C-71 FIELD El11E ,:; +i:;i: i'Gui6r,��,3 PROJECT: Grand Terrace Civic -Center FIELD REPORT NO. 37 CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 81-110CC.52 DATE 10-10-84 TIME 8:30-10:30 a.m.WEA.THER cloudy TEMP RAtiGE 65-70 degrees EST % OF COMPLETION 68% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) - six weeks WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 1. Gypsum wallboard. Councilwoman Barbara Pfennighausen Exterior waterproofing. Councilman Iony Petta 3. Skylights Tom Schwab, Finance Director 4. Aluminum frames and glazing. Seth Armstead, City Manager 5. Rough electrical, mechanical, Bob Stewart, and plumbing. Roy Taylor, Maveric Construction Barbara Anderson, County Librarian OBSERVATIONS Larry Wolff, WLG I. Seth Armsteadauthor! zeex ension of the spare Ima and 211 condui t to bul I ding 2. Additional revisions to the water system shall be required by the Riverside Highland WdtL-r Depdrtlllent. Service to Buildings 2, 3, and 4 shdil be accomaddited from the -- new Civic Center Building Additional plumbing and piping shall have to be installed and a Change Order shall be required. Bob Stewart shall give the Architect a diagram indicating and revisions, which shall be forwarded to the Mechanical Engineer. Once all the requirements have been determined, a proposal request shall be given to the Contractor. 3. The curb and gutter along the Zampese driveway was again discussed. It was agreed that s rolled curb would e the best way to provide the necessary drainage. widp minimum access i-, mquired UP chain link fence and landscaping along this driveway edge shall have to be completely removed in order to install the rolled curbTht ftntfdUtor shdil provide a --price qUOtdtion dt the earliest possible date �for a decision. Continued on page 2 ITEMS TO VERIFY As noted above. RECEIVED INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ac noted ahn vp -- //,� { / (i C ') ill' r 1 rl r - rZ r ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: / LARRYAWOLFF, A AIA DOCUMENT G711 • RCHITECT'S FIELD,REPORT - OCTOBER 1972 EDITION - AIAS - ® 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTIT E OF ARCHITECTS/1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D C. 20006 page of pages n Grand Terrace Field Report #37 Page 2 Observations continued: 4. A walk through of the library was conducted between the County Librarian and the Architect. A sketch was given to the Architect which indicated additional improvements requested by the County. The Architect shall provide the necessary clarification drawings and revisions to reflect these changes, and shall give them to the Contractor for a price quotation. The Architect shall transmit a copy of the reflective ceiling plan, and the design of the counter area to the County Librarian for her information. The furniture and shelving for the new library shall take approximately 12 to 16 weeks from today, and they may not arrive in time for the dedication ceremony. 5. The next regularly scheduled job meeting shall be 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, October 17, 1984. WNER rARC''HiTECT'S AO CHITECWD NEED REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT C771 FIELD ❑ r ' 1A ty J t.' PROJECT: Grand Terrace Civic Center FIELD REPORT NO: 38 CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 81-110CC.52 DATE 10-17-84 TIME 8:30-10:00 a.M1VEA1HER partly cloudy TEMP RANGE 55-60 degrees EST % OF COMPLETION 700! - six weeks io CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 1. Painting. Councilwoman . Exterior waterpruffillY. Councilman Tony Petta 3Glazing Tom Schwab, L Finance Director_ 4. Finish grading. Seth Armstead, City Manager_ 5.Trenehing ` plant Alicia Chavez, Secretary o—Stewart, Bu4idinq i►asp eGt-e r OBSERVATIONS Roy Taylor, Maveri c Construction arry woITT, 1. A quotation in the amount of $533.37 for extension of the future 1" and 2" spare conduit Change Order. 2. A quotation was received from the ftntractor for a swele carb drain, of approximately 248 lineal feet, to be installed along the westerly edge of the easterly driveway. This item shall be presented by the Architect to the Council at the meeting of 3. n alternative or providing new water service to the existing tacility was presented $934.00 for the sand fill used around the fire hydrant line which was less than the origtrial 400 amount previously quoted. ThIS dMOunt was approved dnd d ChdIlye Order shall �be provided by the Architect accordingly. Continued on Page 2 ITEMS TO VERIFY As noted above RECEIVED INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED Asnoted ahnue C� `! QF GRAND TERRACE ATTACHMENTS None REPORT BY: THE AMERICNN 1 STITUT�OFI F ARCH TTS/1 35 NEW OR AVE., ER iEDITION972 NW,WASH NG ON, D.C. 20006 page 1 of 2 pages Grand Terrace Field Report #38 Page 2 OBSERVATIONS Continued: 5. Excellent progress was reported regarding the status of the Dedication Committee. Seth Armstead requested that the dedication brochure to be prepared by the Architect be of a high quality and to be suitable to act as a momento for the occasion. 6. The Architect was directed to investigate the feasibility of installing a pay telephone at the exterior northerly entrance of the Civic Center. The Architect shall contact Pacific Bell and report to the City Council on October 25. 7. The Architect shall investigate the protrusion of the concrete column at the elevator shaft. 8. The Architect directed that all flashing at the earth berm and waterproofing system shall be painted Ameritone color #287A Redwood. 9. The next regularly scheduled job meeting shall be 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, October 24, 1984. PENDI4 COUNCIL APPROVAL 0 (a ► r � iy34 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CC;J1,;CIL'AGEhDA-1"A L/ COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 8 1984 An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in City Hall Building No. 4, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 8, 1984, at 7:35 p.m. PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore Tony Petta, Councilman Roy W. Nix, Councilman Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman Ilene Dughman, Deputy City Clerk ABSENT: Myrna Erway, City Clerk Mayor Grant stated the purpose of the meeting is to review and evaluate the City Manager's work performance. CLOSED SESSION - With concurrence of Council, the meeting adjourned to aClosed Session at 7:35 p.m. RECONVENE - The adjourned regular meeting reconvened at 8:36 p.m., with all present. Mayor Grant stated Council met in Closed Session to review the City Manager's evaluation, and that evaluation has been accomplished. Council will meet in the near future with the City Manager to discuss this evaluation. ADJOURN - The meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m. The next regular meeting wiTl�e held October 11, 1984, at 5:30 p.m., at the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand Terrace, California. Respectfully submitted, / i- -p j. D- APPROVED: Mayor Page 1 - 10/8/84 n CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 0 CT 'N 1--,'o34 PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 11, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA PTO )I L/ A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order at the Terrace View Elementary School, 22731 Grand Terrace Road, Grand Terrace, California, on October 11, 1984, at 5:56 p.m. PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Jim Rigley, Mayor Pro Tempore Tony Petta, Councilman Roy W. Nix, Councilman Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman Seth Armstead, City Manager Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Engineer Ilene Dughman, Deputy City Clerk ABSENT: Myrna Erway, City Clerk The meeting was opened with invocation by Reverend Dale Goddard, Inland Christian Center, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Seth Armstead. ITEM ADDED TO AGENDA - 5.5 - Public Participation. CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION Field Report No. 36 was furnished. John Mathews, 11733 Eton Drive, referencing the deletion of two pay telephones, questioned telephone availability to the public when the libray is closed; stated he was advised the library would have limited hours. It was noted a telephone would be available in the community meeting room. Councilwoman Pfennighausen recommended that Council make the decision relative to Field Report Item No. 1, which pertains to curbing along the easterly edge of the easterly driveway; felt it should be publicly discussed. The City Manager advised any expenditure of funds would be brought to Council. PROCLAMATIONS Toastmasters Communications Month - October, 1984 - Mayor Grant read a Voc amation proclaiming the month of Octo5er, 1984, as "Toastmasters Communications Month" in the City of Grand Terrace; advised the Proclamation would be given to the Grand Terrace Toastmasters. Page 1 - 10/11/84 LM M Councilman Nix noted prior discussion on this issue; felt the situation will change when the land is developed; recommended Staff determine who has the responsibility and provide a Staff Report. HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE The Minutes of September 18, 1984 were provided. Barbara Mathews, Chairperson, reported on the following: (1) Plans for a parade and Country Fair to be held November 3; (2) A Committee Report, furnished Council, dated September 25, 1984, requesting Council authorize subscriptions for the Sun, the Press Enterprise, and the Colton Courier to be delivered to the Secretary's home, at a cost of $168 per year, for collecting articles for the City scrapbook, which will be made available in the new library; (3) Council approval to convene the last meeting in November at 6:15 p.m. in order to have an anniversary potluck dinner to precede the meeting at 5:30 p.m.; (4) Formation of a "Friends of the Library" committee, to be a liaison to the County; the next meeting is scheduled for 7:30 p.m., November 13, at the Terrace View Elementary School auditorium. Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned the need for three more subscriptions and the possibility of furnishing the Committee with a set of newspapers already subscribed for by the City. Mrs. Mathews advised the Secretary already subscribes to those newspapers; because she is doing this for the City, felt the City should pay for those subscriptions. The City Attorney felt there would be no legal problem. City Manager Armstead stated he would resolve the problem. CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE The Minutes of July 16, 1984 and a Committee Report advising and requesting public notification of a change of meeting time to the first and third Monday of each month in the City Hall Building 3 Conference Room were provided. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE The Minutes of August 30, 1984 were provided. The Community Services Director stated Staff attended a recent meeting with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department involving the County -wide emergency operations; cities were given the County guidelines regarding establishment of an emergency operations plan, which were furnished the Committee; the Committee is currently working on a City plan. CITY ENGINEER REPORT City Engineer Kicak stated the zone change ordinance regarding Areas 1, 2, and 26B, scheduled for first reading at this meeting, will be on the Agenda for the next meeting. Page 4 - 10/11/84 n COUNCIL REPORTS Councilwoman Pfennighausen reported the following: (1) Staff and Council were recently commended for conduct and quality of work compared with other cities; (2) Mrs. Jessie Douglas and her brothers, Lindsay and Edward Lynch, thanked the Council Members for their patience and assistance in resolving their zoning problem; (3) Questioned and was advised of the the location of the California Aqueduct pipe in relation to houses in the Griffin project; questioned whether the developer is required to disclose to potential buyers its location in relation to the property. The City Engineer advised its location would be disclosed in the Real Estate Report. Councilman Rigley stated he was shown a plat map which disclosed that information when he viewed those homes. (4) Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated she was advised of a City crew clearing trash from private property in the area of City Center Court and Mt. Vernon; questioned whether the service is available to all property owners. The City Manager noted Council had requested that area be cleaned; employees were directed to clean property on both sides of Mt. Vernon in the Stater Bros. area - was unaware they cleaned private property as well; will counsel personnel to see it does not reoccur; businesses in the Stater Bros. shopping area were also requested to keep dumpsters closed to prevent trash from flying over that area. Councilman Petta recommended Staff investigate the source in order to resolve the problem. Toni Smith, Musso's Delicatessen, 22421 Barton Road, stated there are major problems behind the shopping center - some shocking; cited the area is used for toilet facilities, open sex, bow and arrow range, drug activities, sleeping area for bums; recently a lady gave birth. After having live puppies dumped in their bin, had a lock soldered on, which was cut off; businesses close their bins, but citizens who use them for their own trash do not; people rummage for recyclable items. Ms. Smith stated businesses are concerned; felt the problem is also the City's, and the area should be better patrolled. Mary Schmitgal, 11752 Preston Street, felt City needs more police protection. Ernie Zampese, 22799 Barton Road, objected to the trash coming onto his property from the Stater Bros. complex; felt it is not his responsibility to remove; resented statements relative to the City not picking up trash on private property. Mayor Grant reported the following: (1) Convinced SANBAG the City is entitled to FY84-85 Transportation Development Act funds, resulting in approval of a sidewalk project and two handicap ramps on south Barton Road, in the amount of $22,500; (2) The "Weighted Votes" issue, which invariably disinfrancises 15 San Bernardino County cities, was reapproved for another year by the Omnitrans Board; he and Councilman DeMirjyn of Redlands opposed it. Page 5 - 10/11/84 Recess was called at 7:17 p.m. and reconvened at 7:38 p.m., with all member present. present. ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, IFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. (Second Reading) AREA 10 City Attorney Hopkins read the title of the Ordinance. City Engineer Kicak outlined Areas 10, 11 and 12; stated they are designated as Medium Density Residential on the General Plan, which is defined as R-3 in the zoning ordinance, and up to nine units per acre are permitted through an Architectural Review Committee; the current General Plan allows a maximum of 20 units per acre and requires a Specific Plan, regardless of density, for any project of 16 or more units; it is more restrictive than the previous General Plan, which did not specify maximum density; noted 27 units per acre were allowed in the Terrace Mesa Development. The zoning for Areas 10, 11, and 12 as R-3 will not take density control away from the City; reviewed the processes required for densities over nine unites per acre, as outlined in the Staff Report dated October 4, 1984, Subject: Zone Change Ordinance Areas 10, 11 & 12. Recommended conducting a public hearing, approving second reading of the proposed ordinance by title only, waiving the full reading, and adopting the zone change ordinance by title only. Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, noting the General Plan Update established density, questioned the City Attorney whether a developer could sue the City and City Council Members if zoning from RR to R-3 is denied; further questioned whether a developer has ever collected in such cases. The City Attorney stated someone can always sue someone else; indicated there probably have been cases of developers collecting. Mayor Grant advised he opposed the first reading of the proposed ordinance, which carried 3-2; concerned problems relating to traffic, school impaction, and crime could result; unless the public hearing input changed his mind, would oppose second reading. Stated the Council has not obligated the City at this point relative to the zone change. Councilman Rigley stated he was adamantly opposed to high density apartments in the middle of the City, and voted against R-3 zoning for the area between Mt. Vernon and Canal Street, because he feels the General Plan designation should be amended for that area. Voiced objection to a flier circulated by Byron Matteson, a Citu Council candidate, which contained erroneous information about action taken by Council regarding that area, and made false insinuations about him and the City Engineer. Stated Council took no action on the Planning Commission recommendation to zone that area R-3-11, R-3-12, etc., because R-3 zoning must be adopted in order to be in comformance with the adopted General Plan; to do otherwise could result in litigation Page 6 - 10/11/84 against the City; noted that approval of R-3 zoning is not automatic approval of high -density apartments, since any development plan would require separate processing, public hearing, and Planning Commission approval, and any density exceeding nine units per acre would require a conditional use permit. Councilwoman Pfennighausen noted Council unanimously adopted the General Plan Update on April, 1984, in which Councilman Rigley's statements were addressed, as well as State mandated restraints requiring housing be available to various economic levels. Questioned how any Members could understand and support the General Plan Update in April and vote against the zone change in October. Councilman Nix indicated concurrence. Mayor Grant opened the meeting to Public Hearing. Supporting Testimony Barney Karger, 11668 Bernardo Way, felt the Council has no choice but to zone Area 10 as R-3; noted the long process for a developer; felt low income housing in this Area would not be financially advisable; opposes and has no intention to build low income housing in this Area. Felt quality would be controlled by the Planning Commission; therefore, density should not be an issue. Sanford Collins, Planning Commission Chairman, speaking neither for nor against, felt Council has no obligation to change the zoning, noting Mr. Karger had a project in that area for 37 single family units, which is permissable in R-1 zoning; the developer could request an R-2 or an R-1 designation; questioned why these mistakes are not addressed by Council and Staff. Vince Michaels, USA Properties, felt bringing the zoning into conformance with the General Plan needs to be addressed; noted fees charged developers would be applied to enlarging school capacity; advised they commissioned CG Engineering relative to the traffic concern. Dave Barakian, CG Engineering, 2627 South Waterman, San Bernardino, summarized a traffic study prepared by his firm for the area between Canal Street and Mt. Vernon, which is based on accepted traffic engineering standards and principles. Concluded that, although traffic will increase with the development, there will still be a range of free flow. Bob Keeney, 12139 Mt. Vernon, stated the government defines that annual income below $28,000 qualifies individuals for low income housing; felt no one is planning to create a slum. Opposing Testimony Byron Matteson, 12175 Michigan, offered an apology to Councilman Rigley if he offended him; opposed two real estate agents on the Page 7 - 10/11/84 Council; stated the Planning Commission did recommend limitation of units per acre and the City Engineer did not recommend limitations; opposed the zone changes; concerned crime and traffic problems would result; he did urge citizens to be present at this meeting; concern was expressed it would be useless to bring concerns to Council; felt Council is obligated to follow the wishes of the Community; appreciated Mayor Grant and Councilman Rigley opposing the zone changes. Patricia Allen, 11947 Pascal, voiced concerned about traffic and school problems; felt consideration should be given to school impaction in event Proposition 36 passes, which would eliminate developer fees. Steve Kiaz, 11809 Holly, disagreed with statements relative to free flow of traffic; questioned whether consideration was given to the traffic hazard that now exists at Brentwood and Mt. Vernon; felt a traffic light would be required; reminded Council of campaign statements; felt developers will profit and leave the City with traffic, crime, and school problems. Homer Howell, 11821 Mt. Vernon, was not opposed to nine units per acre; opposed to USA Properties' proposed 20 units per acre; questioned how far the red curbing on Mt. Vernon south of Brentwood would be extended if traffic is doubled. Felt the issue is settled; questioned the motive. Sam Zwansig, 22835 Brentwood, questioned amending the General Plan. Richard Gonzales, 11910 Pascal, presented a petition signed by 54 residents opposing the proposed zone change in Area 10, 11, and 12. Stated drainage problems already exist on Canal Street; questioned whether side streets would be added and, if so, who would finance them; questioned ability to aquire access across the Canal and whether consideration has been given to the Edison poles, which would have to be moved. Edna Best, Mt. Vernon and Brentwood, noted they have a red curb in front of their home due to the existing traffic hazard; felt a serious problem exists now where traffic enters Mt. Vernon from Grand Terrace Road and from Canal Street. Wilma Groghan, 11965 Mt. Vernon, disagreed that there is free flowing traffic on Mt. Vernon, citing difficulty in driveway access; noted they don't have an alley for rear access. Torn Glasser, 22032 Tanager, voiced concern for increased crime with the increased density; aware of Council's attempt to raise revenue to provide services and capital improvements; however, felt quality of life for existing residents in that area would diminish. Page 8 - 10/11/84 L� M Vickie Castillo, 11880 Arliss Drive, opposed the density; would not vote for any Council Member in future elections who supports the zone change. Frances Carter, 11938 Arliss Drive, opposed any kind of large development without a further school impaction study and knowing whether developer fees would be available; felt a Council Member should be flexible enough to change his or her vote on an issue and not stick to a decision made six months ago; wanted her children to acquire the education that would afford living in a prosperous community. Frank Ferre, 23174 Westwood Drive, serves on the School Board but not speaking for the Board, requested consideration be given to the Jarvis 4 Initiative impact on schools. John H. Smith, 11809 Pit. Vernon, voiced concern for traffic problems and felt consideration that school bonds would be required resulting from school impaction. Gene LaRochelle, 11948 Vivienda Court, opposed the density; concerned for traffic and school impaction problems. Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing. Recess was called at 9:15 p.m. and reconvened at 9:25 p.m. with all members present. Mayor Grant stated he would vote in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Councilman Petta felt Council is sensitive and responsive to the citizens; stated he supported first reading after listening to public input, feeling he was sensitive and responsive; has heard a lot of public input since and is aware there is great concern; therefore, would not support the Ordinance. Councilman Rigley stated he supported the General Plan Update feeling one of the Areas already had an approved permit to build condominiums with a density of 12 units per acre; felt it would be the same in the other two areas; Council is aware it does not have to approve this ordinance - the developers can apply for a zone change. Would not support the Ordinance. In response to Councilwoman Pfennighausen's question as to whether Council Members could be individually liable for damages if a zone change request was denied which would conform with the General Plan designation, the City Attorney advised Council regarding the possibility of litigation and possible damages or other remedies available. Councilwoman Pfennighausen stated she would not vote on this issue based upon being re-elected in two years; concerned about the concerns Page 9 - 10/11/84 of the whoe community and what affect this action could have in the future. Felt it difficult not to be sensitive to everybody's rights, including the developers. Concerned that citizens can't afford to purchase homes in the City and for the State's mandate that homes be affordable to people in all economic standings. Was not certain at that point how she would vote. Councilman Nix noted the General Plan can be amended from time to time. Felt, because many meetings were held, the public heard, and Staff was directed to proceed with the zone change process, approval of the first reading was in order to initiate this public hearing; resented implications relative to personal involvement; felt many misstatements have been made. Development is a reality in the City - Council has control on how; property owners and economy control when. Felt issues have become emotional; noted action being taken, independent of this issue, relative to school impaction; the traffic problem on Mt. Vernon has to be solved regardless of development; noted Council had requested a traffic study of the entire City. CC-84-256 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Mayor Grant, to disapprove the proposed Ordinance regarding a zone change amendment for Area 10. Councilman Nix felt the issue will require individual consideration; therefore, would support the Motion; felt it unfortunate the issues became political; felt there have been misstatements and emotionalism. Motion No. CC-84-256 carried, ALL AYES. ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND IFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. (Second Reading) AREA 11 City Attorney Hopkins read the title of the Ordinance. Planning Director Kicak outlined the Area 11. Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing; recommended only testimony be given that would apply specifically to this Area, not covered in Area 10. Supporting Testimony Al Trevino, 1015 Madison Place, Laguna Beach, stated he owns property in this Area which is adjacent to a parcel currently zoned R-3, which he also owns; would like to develop them into one project under R-3 zoning, which he felt would allow better landscaping. Felt there is a housing problem for young people caused by the social change in the last 10 years. David Barakian, 2627 Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino, reviewed various problems and proposed solutions relative to questions asked of him during recess. Nick Khalon, USA Properties, felt Council should not have closed minds because of the election; felt all problems can be resolved. Page 10 - 10/11/84 W Opposing Testimony Byron Matteson, 12175 Michigan, stated Area 11 is the largest and their grea—t-e—sF concern. Homer Howell, 11821 Mt. Vernon, felt economics and ability to pulse a Tome is not the issue. Andy Bromo, Kingston Street, opposed the density; concerned about slums. Zia Tey Martin, 11939 Pascal, opposes the zone change in Areas 10, 11, and 12 forsame reasons given in Area 10 testimonies. Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing. Mayor Grant and Councilman Rigley voiced opposition for same reasons as Area 10. Councilman Petta felt individual zone change requests would be best for the community; felt citizens would be understanding if shown the development would not be detrimental; felt it is his responsibility to listen to the citizens. Councilwoman Pfennighausen voiced concern for affordable rental housing in the City; felt moods will change when developers request individual zone changes after the election. Councilman Nix disagreed that issues for all three Areas are the same; felt Area 12 is definitely a different issue. CC-84-257 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Mayor Grant, ALL AYES, to disapprove the Ordinance relative to the zone change amendment for Area 11. ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRTn__,_M IFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. (Second Reading) Area 12 The City Attorney read the title of the Ordinance. Planning Director Kicak outlined Area 12; advised it is presently zoned AP, and the proposed zoning is R-3 to conform with the General Plan Update. Mayor Grant opened Public Hearing. Supporting Testimony Bob Keeney, 12139 11t. Vernon, stated his approved project has a condition the Area be zoned R-3; objected to including his project with the Areas 10 and 11, feeling the situations are different - developers in Areas 10 and 11 are requesting an increase in density - his request would be down -zoning from AP to R-3, since AP would allow approximately 400 parking spots on the 6.9 acres opposed to his 320; his project would have access onto Barton Road, which would accommodate one-half the traffic, and has an existing access onto Mt. Vernon. Has been two years in the process with nothing resolved. Page 11 - 10/11/84 F] Opposing Testimony Charley Martin, 11939 Pascal, was not opposed to rentals in that area, opposed to 20 units per acre. Dr. Jack R. Booker, 11785 Mt. Vernon Avenue, not speaking for or against at this time, requested Council seriously consider Area 12 in relationship to Mt. Vernon Avenue. Concerned about traffic and the eight driveways on the east side of Mt. Vernon, particulary those opposite the ingress/egress of Area 12 at the crest of the hill; noted Mt. Vernon hasn't been expanded to its optimum width. The USA Developer's Specific Plan, which he read, addressed Canal Street, not Mt. Vernon. Felt a personal study of Mt. Vernon is necessary in order to provide accurate figures. Rebuttal to Opposing Testimony Bob Keeney felt his project would have less impact than the current zoning. Rebuttal to Supporting Testimony Homer Howell, 11821 Mt. Vernon, favored the steady traffic flow resulting from the current zoning for Area 10, rather than concentrated traffic which would result from R-3 zoning. Mayor Grant closed Public Hearing. Councilman Rigley left the Council Chambers at 11:00 p.m. and returned at 11:03 p.m. Mayor Grant stated he understands Mr. Keeney's concerns; however, still has traffic concerns. Councilman Nix stated he will take a different position relative to Area 12, feeling the situation is different, since it is closer to the center of the City and is currently zoned AP with high density development. Commended Dr. Booker for his analysis; however, felt the statement that the access is at the crest of the hill was in error. Mayor Grant opened the meeting to public participation. Bob Keeney, responding to a question regarding the Barton Road access, stated it is a private street completely enclosed within the project, with a condition requiring dividers to delineate the parking lot from that street - the City did not rant it dedicated; indicated he would upgrade to City standards for dedication if desired; felt the width is adequate for two lanes with no parking. Dr. Booker stated that unless that road was widened to make it a public thoroughfare, opposed the R-3 zoning. Mayor Grant closed the meeting to public participation. Page 12 - 10/11/84 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, to approve the Ordinance amending the zone change for Area 12 by title only, waiving full reading in its entirety, with the requirement that the access road width to Barton Road be to the maximum legal limit of the easement to City street standards. Councilman Rigley felt, if this Motion carries, Council will have disapproved the zone change for two other Areas and approved another, all planned for 20 units per acre; approving this Ordinance would -give-- - p- one developer a free zone change, which was denied the others; felt Council has no foundation to make the exception and problems will result; wanted the record to show, if the zone change is approved, he felt Council betrayed the confidence of the people who left the meeting. Mayor Grant indicated concurrence. Councilman Rigley felt density and crime should also be addressed, since they were the concerns addressed in Areas 10 and 11. Councilwoman Pfennighausen felt the ingress/egress from Barton Road presents a totally different situation, since it does not impact Mt. Vernon and Canal. Councilman Nix noted the other two specific proposals for 20 units per acre have not been turned down - Council has stated those two Areas will be considered on an individual basis; felt the issues are not the same and it should be clarified this project has two accesses onto two different thoroughfares. Mayor Grant felt whatever impacts Barton Road impacts Mt. Vernon. City Attorney Nopkin read the Ordinance in its entirety. Councilman Petta stated he would not support the Ordinance, although he favors this project, because of his concern that it would imply favoritism and the setting of double standards. The Motion failed, 2-3, with Mayor Grant and Councilmen Rigley and Petta voting NOE. PALM AVENUE REALIGNMENT - EASTERLY OF BARTON ROAD CC-84-258 Motion by Councilman Nix, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to defer this item to the next meeting. SIGN CODE AME14DME14T Community Services Director Anstine advised the Staff Report, Subject: Amendment to the City Sign Code, outlines recommendations resulting from meetings of an adhoc committee formed with representatives of the Chamber, the City, and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission, at its October 1 meeting, restated its endorsement of those recommendations, which were provided for Council consideration. Page 13 - 10/11/84 n n Mayor Grant opened the meeting for public participation. David Terbest, 22365 Barton Road, representing the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, felt problems of communication exist between the City, the Chamber, and the hearing process within the City's organization. Questioned why the results of the Sign Ordinance Adhoc Committee never made it back to the City Council or the Chamber Board of Directors. The Chamber is requesting a stay on all sign violation citations for 90 days; requested not to have this matter returned to the Planning Commission, but to have public hearings before the City Council, with businesses to participate. The Chamber has serious concerns regarding the Planning Commission and requests Council consider providing them with an educational program feeling their conduct at the last meeting was very unprofessional,and invoked the rath of the business community. Mr. Terbest, relative to the Chamber Newsletter, stated the Chamber feels candidate statements should be published in the Newsletter; requested Council support in allowing them to be printed in a non -political and informational manner. Toni Smith, 22421 Barton Road, stated she totally endorses what the Chamber is doing; felt some of the sion code requirements are not in the best interests of the business community; other business are also concerned; requested Council review the sign regulations and listen to the input of businesses. Larry Halstead, 22675 Barton Road, stated he served on the Adhoc Committee; the sign ordinance was reviewed very thoroughly; the recommendations in the Staff Report is only a summary prepared by Bob Yeates; questioned what happened to the complete information and what brought about the reaction at the last Planning Commission meeting. Gene Carlstrum, 22456 Barton Road, a businessman, advised he received a notice that his sign was in violation; understood the older signs that are maintained and not detrimental to the community would be allowed to remain; felt those signs should be required to conform only if the business is upgraded. Mayor Grant closed the meeting to public participation. Mayor Grant questioned whether the Staff Report recommendations are those of the Chamber or the Planning Commission. Noted there was controvery regarding the adoption of the sign ordinance initially; felt some changes are justified; agreed with what the Chamber is advocating. Councilman Petta removed himself from participation in this matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Councilman Nix stated he attended the last Planning Commission meeting, at which the Planning Commission questioned why this matter was returned to them, stating they informed Staff of their position Page 14 - 10/11/84 :.J n four months ago; objected to the length of time taken to present a report on this critical issue. Felt the letter sent by Staff to the businesses regarding sign violations created hostility; objected to the Planning Commission Chairman's conduct at that meeting, which - irritated the business community, and should not be ignored. Felt the Chamber's recommendation is outstanding. The City Attorney, responding to whether the five-year deadline can be extended, stated it would require a Planning Commission public -hearing prior to Council amending the Ordinance. Council can instruct Staff not to issue any citations for existing signs for a specific period of time pending the outcome. CC-84-259 Motion by Councilman Rigley, Second by Councilman Nix, that Staff hold in abeyance any citations until an amended zoning ordinance can be enforced. Following discussion, the Motion was amended, with concurrence of its Second, that the period -of time for abeyance be 90 days. It was clarified that the Motion relates to nonconforming signs. Motion No. CC-84-259 carried, 4-0, with Councilman Petta abstaining. FINAL APPROVAL OF TRACTS 9773, 9773-1 & 9773-2 City Engineer Kicak outlined the location of Tracts 9773, 9773-1, and 9773-2; advised the three Tracts contain a total of 68 lots; all of the conditions of approval have been complied with through submittal of bonds and agreements; advised the Bonds and amounts are as listed in the Staff Report dated October 11, 1984, Subject: Final Approval of Tracts 9773, 9773-1 and 9773-2, which was furnished to Council. Staff recommends that Council accept all of the Bonds for the improvements, approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreements for all the improvements, and approve Final Tract Maps 9773-1, 9773-2, and 9773. Councilwoman Pfennighausen questioned the revisions to pad elevations and road grades in Tract 9773 referenced in the Planning Commission September 10, 1984 Minutes. City Engineer Kicak advised the 12% gradings established by the Department of Forestry were exceeded by 1/2% and some of the pads exceeded the elevations on the Tentative Tract Map; the Forestry was consulted and had no objections to the variances; the revisions were then taken to the Planning Commission for approval. Bill Snell, Ultra Engineering, Colton, stated the lots adjacent to the existing Tract are within a foot of the Tentative Map grades; the reason for major changes in pad elevations was because of the steepness. CC-84-260 Motion by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, Second by Councilman Petta, ALL AYES, to accept the following improvement Bonds, approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Street & Storm Drain, Sanitary Sewer, Landscaping, and Water System agreements, and approve the Final Tract Maps for Tracts 9773, 9773-1, and 9773-2: Page 15 - 10/11/84 Grading Permit Bonds, Tracts 9773, 9773-1 & 9773-2 No. 908242S $150,000.00 Tract 9773-1 Bonds Street/Storm Drain - Performance Bond No. 908246A 135,000.00 Street/Storm Drain - Labor & Material Bond No. 908246S 67,500.00 Sewer - Performance Bond No. 908245S 25,000.00 Sewer - Labor & Material Bond No. 908245S 12,500.00 Landscape - Performance Bond No. 908244S 27,000.00 Landscape - Labor & Material Bond No. 908244S 13,500.00 Water - Performance Bond No. 908247S 62,000.00 Water - Labor & Material Bond No. 908247S 31,000.00 Tract 9773-2 Bonds Street/Storm Drain - Performance Bond No. 908283S $111,000.00 Street/Storm Drain - Labor & Material Bond No. 908283S 55,500.00 Sewer - Performance Bond No. 908284S 13,000.00 Sewer - Labor & Material Bond No. 908284S 6,500.00 Landscape - Performance Bond No. 908282S 62,000.00 Landscape - Labor & Material Bond No. 908282S 31,000.00 Water - Performance Bond No. 908465S 22,000.00 Water - Labor & Material Bond No. 908465S 11,000.00 Tract 9773 Bonds Street/Storm Drain - Performance Bond No. 908250S $ 88,000.00 Street/Storm Drain - Labor & Material Bond No. 908250S 44,000.00 Sewer - Performance Bond No. 908248S 20,000.00 Sewer - Labor & Material Bond No. 908249S 10,000.00 Landscape - Performance Bond No. 908249S 52,000.00 Landscape - Labor & Material Bond No. 908249S 26,000.00 Water - Performance Bond No. 908466S 23,000.00 Water - Labor & Material Bond No. 908466S 11,500.00 Monument Bonds Tract 9773-1 $ 4,800.00 Tract 9773-2 No. 098360S 4,000.00 Tract 9773 4,000.00 CITY ATTORNEY REPORT The City Attorney advised an employee of MSaveric Construction, who was injured on the Civic Center construction site, filed a claim against the City, which could result in litigation; he is precluded from filing a claim against the contractor because of the Workmen's Compensation laws. Maveric Construction has filed for additional payment relative to the earth -moving operations. Page 16 - 10/11/84 n ADJOURN - the regular meeting adjourned at 12:25 a.m. to an adjourned regular meeting to be held October 18, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in City Hall Building No. 4, 22795 Barton Road, pertaining to a personnel evaluation of the City Manager. Respectfully submitted, Deputy City C'i APPROVED: Mayor Page 17 - 10/11/84 OCT 2 5 1984 450 s PENDING CITY 0 REGISTER NO.102584 GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL APPROVAL PAGE NO. 1 DEMAND /WARRANT REGISTER NO. 8 5 - 0 4 2 VOiJNCIL 'AGEN15,4�htsA DATE 10 / 2 5 / 8 4 UCHER N0. PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT ASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER,C/M 0-4190-238 F6165 42.60 BOTTLED wATER,FINANCE 0-4190-238 6163 9.50 60TTLED WATER?C/C EOC 0-4190-238 6164 19.00 2580 71.10 ECKLEY-CARRY CO. SUPPLIES FOR REC.SVCS. U-4430-220 40696 381.73 L2581 381.73 ALIF. MUNICIPAL BUSINESS TA REG.CMBTA MEET.RANDY 0-4140-270 75.00 D4105 75.00 OLTON, CITY OF W.W.D.SERVICES 10/84 1-4570-802 18763.18 D4100 18763.18 OLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRI COUNCIL MEET.9/13 & 9/27/ 0-4110-242 110.00 SQUARE DANCE 9/1/84 0-4430-242 60.00 PLANNING MEET. 9/10/84 0-4801-242 25.00 2582 195.00 COPY LINE CORP. SUPPLIES FOR COPIER 0-4190-210 40960 54.88 1,2583 54.88 U COMPUTER SUPPLY DISKETTES,RIBBON/WORD PRO10-4421-210 5047 92.72 12584 92.72 AVIS CAMERA SHOP SLIDES/CONST.HONEY HILLS 0-4804-210 66.25 24104 66.25 EFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN DEF.COMP.P/R END.10/6/84 0-2164-000 534.00 DEF.COMP.P/R END.10/6/84 0-2170-000 403.92 DEF.COMP.P/R END.10/6/84 0-4120-139 388.80 DEF.COMP.P/R EiND.10/6/84 0-4125-139 306.56 OEF.COh1P.P/R END.10/6/84 0-4140-139 4.93.60 DEF.COtiP.P/R END.10/6/84 0-4180-139 448.26 GRAND TERRACE L- J m PAGE NO. DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 85-042 DATE 10/25/84 OCHER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV. NO AMOUNT NO AMOUNT DEF.COMP.P/R END.10/6/84 1-4572-139 121.81 P4106 2696.97 GRAND TERRACE AREA 2ND QUART.DIST.CHA;.IBER 110-4190-221 5487.50 P4101 5487.50 LETTER GRANO 4ELDING SERVICE AELD HASP,PARK 10-4180-245 35.00 12585 35.00 HARBER COMPANY REPAIR BARTON RD. 16-4900-255 2713 1010.60 REPAIR MAIN STREET 16-4900-255 2714 110.00 12586 1120,60 IPS SERVICES INCORPORATED STREET SWEEP 9/25/84 18-4908-255 5570 368.70 12587 .366.70 KICAK 8 ASSOCIATES ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4120-601 2495.30 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4170-250 2630.00 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4330-255 3092.45 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4370-255 3053.50 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4593-600 185.60 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 10-4610-255 2179.00 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 16-4930-600 1683.00 ENG.SVCS. 9/10-9/30/84 1-4572-601 21.54 P4103 15340..35 VIRGIL LIVELY CROSSING GUARD 10/1-10/1217-4910-250 159.00 12588 159.00 OMA LINDA DISPOSAL TRASH PICK-UP 10/84 C/H 10-4180-245 37.05 TRASH PICK-UP,10/84,PARK 10-4430-245 37.05 12589 74.10 ICHAEL LUNA USE OF TRUCK 9/84,LUNA 10-4180-240 107.69 _ LOCAL MILEAGE,LUNA 10-4180-271 74.78 GRAND TERRACE DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO m 85-042 vj PAGE NO. .3 DATE 10/25/84 N� ER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT LOCAL MILEAGE,LUNA 10-4180-271 62.43 12590 244.90 4CMASTERS-CARR SUPPLY CO. EOUIP.RESTPOOrfS/PARK 10-4430-245 536701 302.50 12591 302.50 AINE NEBBER CASH FUND RETIRE.P/R END.10/6/84 0-2167-000 35.66 RETIRE.P/R ErJD.10/6/84 0-4120-140 266.35 RETIRE.P/R Ef4D.10/6/84 0-4125-140 210.02 RETIRE.P/R END.10/6/84 0-4140-140 338.16 RETIRE.P/R END.10/6/84 0-4180-140 307.11 RETIRE.P/R END.10/6/84 1-4572-140 83.45 4108 1240.75 x PEOPLE HELPERS INC REC.SERVICES 10/1-10/15/8 0-4430-250 1294.87 12592 1294.87 * RESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY AD FOR ACCT.CLERK/SEC. 0-4120-230 L1878 222.48 12593 222.48 * ALPH'S PLUMBING ORION VALVE FOR PARK 10-4430-245 2177 80.30 2594 80.30 f REGENTS-UC ACCT.CLASS,DUARTE,MICHOWSIO-4120-268 22101 290.00 12595 290.00 AN BDNO CO CENTRAL CR UNION EMPLOYEES DED.P/R END. 0-2165-000 1119.33 54107 1119.33 10/6/84 AN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF PARCEL REPORT LISTINGS 10-4120-249 D4032 246.08 12596 :246.08 AN BERNARDINO,AUDITOR/CONTR PARKING CITES,9/30,CJFTCF 0-2200-000 - 55.50 2597 55.50 r GRAND TERRACE m M PAGE NO. DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 85-042 DATE 10/25/84 OCHER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN 'N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT AN BERNARDINO COUNTY PAPER FOR COPIER 10-4190-210 502649 493.48 1259a 493.48 SHERIFF FLOYD TID,,ELL LAA Ei4FOrtCE.%lENT, 10/84 10-4410-256 34169.00 P4102 3418S.00 ; SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L BANK E.O.C. CONF.9/16,ANSTINE 10-4808-270 208.03 1259S 208.03 SIMONIS MORELAND ACCOUNTANTS PROGRESS BILLING 83/84 AU10-4140-250 646.80 12600 646.80 SO. CALIF. EDISON COMPANY 2 LIGHTS AT PARK,9/24 10-4430-238 24.91 ELEC.SIGNALSr(2) 9/84 16-4510-238 264.34 12601 289.25 SO. CALIF. GAS COMPANY GAS C/H 9/84 10-4190-238 41.61 12602 41.61 SUN BADGE COMPANY I.D. BADGE,T, SCHtNAB 10-4140-210 60008 42.35 12603 42.35 TIGER SYSTEMS RENT STORAGE BIN 10/84 10-4110-240 100921 60.00 12604 60.00 PEGGY TROTTIER LOCAL MILEAGE,TROTTIER 10-4140-271 5.53 LOCAL MILEAGE,TROTTIER 1-4572-271 7.35 12605 12.88 ERTICAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PROCESS PARK.CITES 8/31/810-4412-255 B4009 11.55 12606 11.55 AYSIDE SYSTEMS ABSENTEE CALENDARS 10-4140-210 54149 25.53 2607 25.53 GRAND TERRACE n u PAGE NO DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 85-042 DATE 10/25/84 JCHER PAYEE DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WARRANT CHECK WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT HMPESE & DE BENEDET RENT C/H 11/84 0-4190-242 625.00 12608 625.00 1' 1 DLTON HIGH! YELLOo JACKETS DONATION,COLTOi•1 BAND 0-4190-220 100.00 P4109 100.00 aEFFREY D. HIGHLAND W.VI.D.REFUND,HIGHLANO 1-3114-000 10.71 12609 10.71 A'W DISTRIBUTORS CAL PENAL CODE,PUBLICATIO 0-4120-249 16.34 P4099 16.34 , ALLY MACIAS W.W.D.REFUNDFMACIAS 1-3114-000 7.00 2610 7.00 , LSTEN 'TEMPORARY SERVICES TEMP.CLERK/TYPIST 10-4125-250 D2572 262.80 TEMP.CLERK/TYPIST 10-4125-250 24885 262.80 12611 525.60 , PAYROLL PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 10-2161-000 1097.14— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 10-2162-000 189.08— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-2163-000 68.47— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 10-2164-000 534.00— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-2165-000 1119.33- PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 10-2167-000 35.66— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-2169-000 50.00- PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-2170-000 253.92— PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-4110-120 750.00 PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-4120-110 2148.03 PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-4125-110 1693,72 PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-4140-110 11-4572-110 2727.07 PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 0-4180-110 2476,68 PAYROLL ENDING 10/6/84 672.99 7120.89 GRAND TERRACE- PAGE NO. 6 DEMAND /WARRANT REGISTER NO. 8 5- 0 4 2 DATE 10 / 2 5/ 8 4 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ':CHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN 40. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV NO. AMOUNT NO AMOUNT NRITTEN 8289;25 REPAID 86215.56 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 94504.81 RECAP BY FUiJD RE -PAID BITTEN FUND 10 64869.63 6351.55 FUND 16 1683.00 1384.94 FUND 17 .00 159.00 FUND 18 .00 �368.70 FUND 21 19662.93 25.06 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, HE AFO ELISTED CHECKS FOR P YMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESS RY AND PPROPRIATE EX ENDIT RES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. THOM S SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR v STAFF REPORI late C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XXX) MEETING DATE: Oct. 25, 1984 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES, CLAIM NO. GTLC 84-04 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED xxXX Rose, Klein, & Marias the attorneys for William B. Davis have filed a claim for $250,000 in addition to special damages. The claim is made due to an incident which occured on July 5, 1984 at the City Hall Construction Site. Claimant was injured when he fell from a truss while placing plywood sheeting on tresses causing injuries. The claimant alleges that the City of Grand Terrace failed to provide adaquate supervision and safety practices Staff Recommends That Council: 1. REJECT THE CLAIM AND REFER THE MATTER TO CARL WARREN AND COMPANY INSURANCE ADJUSTERS. 2. DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION TAKEN. uate: October 16, 1984 AFF 12-8.5016 *T ST C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: -October 25, 1984 AGENDA ITEM NO. ,ZG SUBJECT: Ratification of Negative Declaration FUNDING P,EQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED xx The Planning Commission at their regular meeting of September 10, 1984, considered the Site and Architectural Review 84-7 and Buffer Zone Variance for a one-story modular medical building located at 22182 Barton Road. Attached you will find the Staff Report, which was presented to the Planning Commission at that meeting, the plan and the elevations of the proposed structure, and a Negative Declaration for the subject project. STAFF RECOMMENDS: THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RATIFY THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO FILE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. JK/lh n 12-8.5016 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 10, 1984 FROM: Planning Department AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: II-B SUBJECT: Site and Architectural Peview 34-7/ 3uffer Zone Var_ance, one-3tory Nodular medical building a 22132 Barton Road - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: Loma Linda University Medical Group, Inc. 25455 Barton Road, Suite 206A Loma Linda, CA 92354 Shamma Enterprises, Inc. 2229 East Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 22182 Barton Road 275-242-12 ± 19,032 square feet Office Commercial North = Medium Density Residential South = General Commercial East = Office Com miercial West = Office Commercial A/P North = R-2 South = C-2 East = A/P West = A/P SUBJECT SITE: The subject site is a vacant parcel of land having a width of 90' and a depth of 214 feet. The site slopes gently towards Barton Road and has recently been disked. REQUEST: The Applicant, Shamma Enterprises, is requesting Site and Architectural approval for the construc- tion of a modular one-story medical facility at 22182 Barton Road. Concurrently, the Applicant is also requesting a variance from the requirement of Section 16.040 (M) of Ordinance 57. Section 16.040 (M) which states: -1- In M STAFF REPORT 12-8.5016 Page 2 REQUEST: Continued. Section 16.040 (M): "M. That there shall be provisions for a twenty-five (25) foot landscaped buffer contain- ing evergreen trees wherever a commercial or industrial zone abutts a residentially zoned district." The Applicant requests a variance along his North property line to allow for adequate parking spaces. A Site Plan is attached for your review. ENVIRCN TAL ANALYSIS: A negative environmental declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF ANALYSIS: The Planning Staff has reviewed the application under the development standards established by Ordinance 57, "Zone Ordinance" of the City of Grand Terrace. The major areas of concern involve the requested variance along with the requirement for a perimeter wall. The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission waive the following section of Ordinance 57: 16.040 (J) That a solid masonry wall with a minimum height of six (6) feet above highest finished grade shall be provided around the perimeter of the site proposed for development excepting said wall requirement may be waived in part or total by a majority vote of the total membership of the Planning Commission or City Council if appealed: The applicant has also requested that a variance from Section 16.040 (M) of Ordinance 57 be processed simultaneously with his site and archi- tectural application. The proposed variance requested the elimination of the required 25' landscaped buffer zone on the south boundary. The plot plan submitted for the site review shall also be used for the variance. The variance shall be considered based upon the following conditions: 1.) That any variance shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not consitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situated; -2- n STAFF REPORT 12-8.5016 Page 3 M STAFF ANALYSIS: Continued. 2.) That because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this title is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and identical zone classification. -he ?l annl'n _�^� �:�: n -a'_l -, rove `_^e variance application only if: A. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Any variance shall be conditioned, if necessary, to prevent the granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classifications, and; B. The proposed variance will be consistent with the latest adopted General Plan, and; C. The proposed variance does not allow any land use which is not in conformity with the use regulations specified for the district in which the land is located, and; D. Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of this Section including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, are made part of the variance approval. The Planning Commission has two alternatives based on the approval or denial of the variance requested by the applicant in the previous section of this staff report. The two alternatives are: I.) If the variance is denied, site and architectural approval shall be denied under 16.060(A) of Ordinance 57 because the site plan does not meet the buffer zone requirements of Chapter 16. II.) The Planning Commission may approve the variance by motion. -3- STAFF REPORT 12-8.5016 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Mr. Chairman, based on the material in the Staff presentation and report, and the testimony received, I move to approve a variance for SA 84-7 that will eliminate the requirements of Section 16.060 (A) of Ordinance 57. I the variance :daS :f th-�%i t i �dr the P l a.^.n i '1 _ :�' 1iS3ion .^ay idcc -.-e _ ;il r/1Ig fin-- _. take the following action: 1. The project meets or exceeds the criteria established in Chapter 16, Ordinance 57. 2. The project will not be detrimental to the health, morals, safety, comfort or welfare of persons working within the neighborhood or City, nor injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan. 4. Conditions necessary to secure the purpose of this Chapter, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions are made of this approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: MR. CHAIRMAN, BASED ON THE MATERIAL IN THE STAFF PRESENTATION AND REPORT, AND THE TESTIMONY RECEIVED, I :MOVE TO ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLAN 84-7, INCLUDING THE FINDINGS AS WRITTEN IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: KL JECT TO RATIFICATION OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TDS/lh -4- 12-8.5016 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SA 84-7 1. If the above referenced SA 84-7 is approved, applicant and/or property owners shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 2. Approval of this permit SA 84-7 shall expire, if not used, one year from date of approval unless application is made prior to expiration for an extension not exceeding one year. 3. Approval of this application constitutes site and architectural approval only, and does not constitute approval of any sign permit, grading permit, building permit, or any other permit required by the City. 4. Approval of this application ices not `cnstitute 3pproval o-f arr, future expansion. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the necessary additional dedication shall be provided along all right of ways in accordance with the General Plan. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans for the construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk at their ultimate location along the Barton Road frontage shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 7. All improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a "will serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company shall be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety. 9. The applicant shall conform to all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 10. All Utilities shall be underground. 11. The proposed trash enclosure shall be roofed. ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS I am the owner of the property described above. I am aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth herein. It is further understood that all of the aforementioned conditions which require installation of improvements shall be completed in a manner satisfactory to the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by said Department. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT DATE - 5- -I _ i_" T_T= a J o t•,-0 7e 5TTE PLAN -- N 7 ti a� w !Y!a a, F _ JYK Jo </ sAso J. I► INq aGt Sie Y v ,R w qy rv. 1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT 84-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace —jencz") to un:i ?ruake a Pro-"Ct_ ^y'.nTall j 'Iescr-:`,ed -,s Follows: Construction of a One -Story Medical Center on Assessor's Parcel 4275-242-12 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Agency has received and reviewed an initial study on said Project, pursuant to the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and guidelines adopted in accordance therewith. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Agency, based upon the initial study, made findings and determinations that the Project will not have a significant effect upon the environment for the reasons set forth as follows: 1. That the Project will not be growth inducing. 2. That the Project has been adequately addressed in prior environmental evaluations; 3. That the negative impacts of the Project, if any, will be short-term during the construction phase and can be mitigated by proper construction practices; and 4. That the initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that this Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration is based upon certain documents described as follows and available for review in the City Clerk's Office: 1. Map showing location of the Project; 2. Initial Study to determine environmental effects. V NOTICE IF FURTHER GIVEN that not less than a fifteen (15) day period has been given for review and comment on this Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration and that written comments on any matters material thereto shall be received, by personal delivery or mail, at the place and not later than the time specified as follows: TIME PLACE 5:00 P.M. City of Grand Terrace 0e_nte,mber 10 1?34 22795 Barton ?cad Grand Terrace, CA 92324 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, after expiration of the time for review and comment, the Agency shall consider any written comments material to this Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any interested person may review any and all documents incident to this Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration or obtain copies hereof, at the actual cost of reproduction, during regular business hours at the location specified as follows: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, if any public agency or interested person or organization fails to submit written comments on this Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration within the time specified herein, it shall be pre- sumed, without a written request for a specific extension of time to review and comment together with the reasons therefor, that such agency of person or organization has no comment to make. The granting or denial of an exten- sion of time for review and comment shall be completely within the discretion of the Agency. DATED: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER M CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 NEGATIVE DECLARATION SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 84-7 Lead Agency: City of Grand Terrace (the "Agency") Lccat=n of Pro'?ct: City of ,rand 7srrace San Bernardino County, California Description of The Project may be generally described Project: as follows: Construction of a one-story Medical Center on Assessor's Parcel No. 277-242-12 Findings and The Agency has made findings and determinations: Determinations: 1. The Project will not be growth inducing; 2. The Project has been adequately addressed in prior environmental evaluations; 3. The negative impacts of the Project, if any, will be short-term during the construction phase and can be mitigated by proper construction practices; and 4. The Project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Initial Study: A true and correct copy of the Initial Study on the Project is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation measures are a part of the Initial Study. Person to Contact: The name, address, and telephone number of the person to contact on any matter incident to issuance of this Negative Declaration is set forth as follows: 4 *4 City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Attn: Seth Armstead, City Manager Documents: Copies of all documents incident to issu3nc,:! of the Negative C-:clarati-n may be obtained, at the cost of r-pro-- duction, or inspected at the office of the Agency. DATED: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BY: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER 14 EXHIBIT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 12-8.5016 1. Name of Proponent LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL GROUP 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 25455 Barton Road, Suite Toma Lima. CA 92354 3. u--ite of Checklist Submitted: 8-20-34 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Grand Terrace 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Site and Architectural Review 84-7 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE 110 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, _ or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean of any bay, inlet or lake? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- X slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration X of ambient air quality. b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either X locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns X or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X c. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X d. Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X e. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? X f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X g. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X h. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards, such as flooding or tidal waves? X 1 i 4. Plant life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Feduction in acreage of any agricultural. crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light and glare? S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X ._.X.. X X X X 2 fir �V YES MAYBE NO c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? X d. Alteration to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following arei a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality of quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of or the destruction of a prehistoric archaeological site? X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect `unique ethnic cultural values? X 3 .9 0 d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. YES MAYBE NO X a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub- stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or aninal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? ( A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) DATE On the basis of this initial evaluation: _X_I find the proposal COULD NOT have a significant effect on environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a signficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Signature For 4 �..t � 110N ONLY-,.. pCfi 2 51984 �.. � `a � ivy _ ® R r IN!ED Historical & CulturaMctivities Committee M4 Minutes of Meeting of October 1, 1984 'M1 :M1J 1..it :I I ' Meeting was called to order at 7 PM by Chairman Barbara Mathews. Present were Barbara Bayus, Elizabeth Duarte, Ann Petta, Irene Mason, Hannah Laister & Barbara Mathews. The minutes of the September 10 and September 18 were read and approved with the correction of Pot Luck Dinner to "some time in November". Treasurer's report shows that to August 31, $38 spent, also 4135 for flyers and $117 for posters for the fair. Balance is $2,500. Reports: Senior Citizens Organization: Elizabeth suggested that the Committee become involved to help in any way we can and the Committee approved. Flag: City was surprised at Lhe cost of each flag - 64JO each. Several citizens attended the dedication of the new County Center where our flag is on display vrith other incorporated cities. Each flag was carried across the stage and introduced. Our flag was also displayed at the County Fair in Vic1-orville. Funding of the County library was ap_roved in the amount of $63,000_for six months through June 1985. It was voted that the Committee wil be Friends of the Library. A letter was written to the City and the Council thanking them for their help in attaining one of our goals. Our next project will be to get our old newspap.ers bound Poem: Elizabeth showed the committee a sample of work on the format of the poem. Dick Rollins will proceed to have the poem printed after which the committee will have it framed. Pot Luck for City 6th Anniversary: The pot luck v,ill be November 29th. Elizabeth ::ill be in charge of flyers to be sent vri.th the November 1 seater billing along with posting o-lher.-, throughout the ci•cy. Barbara Ba,ius is In charge of tables. The City Odll sup,)ly the cake and bevera:oe, '-, , �rare. Irene vlllthe CJRl-:ii;i;ea Ii� ,p.z� be in cilaroe of serving b�ver�. es, ;na':ing Uunch & coffee, hot .eater for tea. Ann & 3:irba_ra iri11 pet the food on the t-bl s. IIanna': :ril? be in c':ar;e of a historical dis:) -:-y. 1)1d 11ar.nlesst1 for:ls /hc ve bee', �^e+ar_d. Posters h:ve baea co_nvletad and put in merchants windows. We will ask the council to remind everyone to support the fair. Barbara and Irene will contact last years' entrants to see if they are going to participate. Ribbons and trophies iti_ll be purchased. A local D.J. will be asked to announce the parade. With the new parking lot, there will be ample parking on Vivienda. We will have_a final m:.eting on the 22nd at 7 PM at Barbara Mathews home. New Business: Civic Center Dedica_ i ion, is tM1aatatively schadaled for Sunday afternoon'February 17th, 1985. Hot dogs and buns have been donated by Stator 3rothers. There will be a ceremony, tours of the building by the Woman's Club. Our committee will be involved in some way. such as s,'ving foo-:l, gre-ating p,oile. October 1, 1984 Minutes - Pa;;e #2 The Parks & Recreat_�_on Sa_vi.ces will hold a Halloween Carnival at the Terrace Hills Jr. Hi-fi School. The corn::.ittee was asked to have a food or game booth; ho�,rever since it is so close to our fair, it was decided not to get involved at this time. The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 PM. Our next meetingwill be November 5th. Resy:ectfully subAtted, t-� s Hannah Laister, Socret2ry Ln u ACTION REQUIRED t, C `,84 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 22, 1984 Themeeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Those present were Irene Mason, Barbara Mathews, Ann Petta, Barbara Bayus, Hannah Laister and Elizabeth Duarte. Motion made, second and approved that we ask Council to review the Chamber Newsletter to see if they are spending City funds wisely. Motion made, second and approved that the temporary sign for the civic center complex, and include City Library as well as the permanent plaque, and request that the Historical & Cultural Activities Committee include in their budget monies for the library. The Committee is to work with the "Friends of the Library" for the best interest of the library. Elizabeth Duarte presented to the Committee the framed poem "Grand Terrace" by Thomas Teorey. Caligraphy was done by Kathy Evans, a friend of Dick Rollins. Discussion followed on finalization of Country Fair plans. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. The next meeting will be November 5, 1984. Repsectfully submited, Aelt,,"L &�'-t±4Z, Hannah Laister, Secretary ST4J�FF RF-Pkulr 12.206 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) KETING DATE: October 25, 1584 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT: - BA�TO�PALt•1 RwE�,�'�t4Et�� _�______� - _-� FU;DItG REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED As requested by the City Council, attached you will find a report from Traffic Safety Engineers for improving the traffic circulation at the intersection of Barton Road and Palm Avenue triangle. The conclusions of their findings and their recommendations are on pace 2 of their report. They are reco=ending that Plan E as originally prc posed by our office be impleimented, along with additional signing and no parking. I have attached in addition to TSE Report,Exhibits C and D copies of regulatory and warning signs that are being recommended as well as Exhibit E shoeing the striping plan for Barton Road as approved by Cal -Trans. In striping plan provides for left turn pocket from Barton Road to Palm Avenue. The estimated costs of the project as proposed by TSE is $17,500.00. It is cur recommendation that this project be considered separately from the Barton Road FAU project. �:lthough it is not PAU eligible, it ;:ould require Cal -Trans r.evieei if included in Barton Road bid package and potentially further delay the Barton Road project. If approved, Palm Avenue improvements would be coordinated with ;ar ton Poad i-rtprove:: er:ts . E IS i1 _.:?le. pro"C)"e(I cur',_) and the r�r,;ht-of-.7ay line is s :':;n on that '."flan. Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. DIRECT THE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE DESIGN OF THE IMPROVEMEI`iTS AS PER PLAN E AND THE RECOM-MENDATION OF TSE. 2. AUTHORIZE ADVERTISING FOR BIDS IN THE TI.•IELY MANNU R TO HAVE BARTON ROAD AND PALM AVE14UE PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE SAME TIAME. 3. AUTHORIZE AN EXPENDITURE OF $17,500.00 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND INSPECTION FROM THE RESTRICTED GAS TAX FUNDS. JK:dlk TRAP*fC SAFETY ENGINEERS August 9, 1984 Mr. Randall Anstine Community Services Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 t Dear Mr. Anstine: In response to your request for traffic investigation at the inter- section of Barton Road and Palm Avenue, I wish to present my findings, conclusions and recorimendations. Accident Analysis A collision diagram showing all the traffic accidents occurring at this intersection from 1981 to June of 1984 is shown in Exhibit A. More than one-half of the total accidents involved northbound on Palm Avenue left -turning onto Barton Road colliding with eastbound Barton Road through traffic. The remaining accidents involved westbound traffic on Palm Avenue failing to negotiate the curve and run directly into "triangle" island. Site Analvsis The landsc<:ped plantings in the "triangle" island severely ca:r:ouflage the visibility of eastbound traffic to southbound traffic at the Pali- Avenue/triangle island approach. In spite of this sight distance deficiency, the accident history does not record any traffic accident caused by such south/east vehicular conflict. curve on Palm T,venue for ��estbounri traffic approaching the wr:r_�rsvc*:��n is e ftrc--;ely shafp. Even t',:ough all thc: require': s c: iC: = Gr GrOf C.--- ��oStf d::a G ,I ] n(-,c. _C',Q, Lfi I -i' failing to r:rgotiate tt;c curvy` is [act-.::tially hicjh csL-e,;=al1Y `or motorists who unfamiliar with the area. iintr) tAAPywo n nRIvF ORANGF CALIFORNHA 92667 0 (714) 974 7863 n PAGE 2 Conclusions and Recommendations The intersection of Barton Road and Palm Avenue should be widened to: 1. Eliminate the sight distance restriction at the "triangle" island/Palm Avenue approach. 2. Minimize the abrupt horizontal curve. 3. Provide a greater intersection identification of exiting Palm Avenue traffic to motorists on Barton Road. Review of the various design plans proposed by Kicak & Associates for such intersection widening indicates that Plan E is highly recom::enced. A sketch of design Plan E with additional stripings and markings is shown in Exhibit B. Investigation was made to explore the feasibility of stcpping east- bound Pala Avenue traffic adjacent to the "triangle" island approach. However, this stop control can cause potential unintentional running stop sign violations because of the moderate approaching speed as motorists branching out from the Barton Road traffic stream. The distance between the Barton Road turnout and the proposed Palm Avenue sotp location (approximately 120 feet) does not provide adequate stopping distance for this 30-35 M.P.H. approaching speed. Therefore, for interim safety measure, it is recommended that a stop control be installed for southbound traffic on Palm Avenue. Other minor safety improvements to enhance the overall intersection safety are: 1. Install "DO t.OT E:+TER" signs at eastbound Palm Av(.:nue traffic approach. 2. Inst.al.l "LEFT TURN ONLY" sign for southbound Palm Avenue traffic 4L•j �r--ach . 1 •_,; "C� :,�� ':.'.F..'It: �.i: .'�" „�::., o:� F;arto:� �:U.:.:�, e.:st and wci st of P a I nue. 4. Install a W58 "DOUBLE ARROW" sign at the triangle island nose on Barton Road to make motorists more aware of the island and traffic is permitted to pass on either side of the island. V� PAGE 3 S. Paint red zone on the entire south side of the triangle island facing Barton Road and about 60 feet on Barton Road east of Palm Avenue. Respectfully Submitted, TRkFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERS C. �ii Lai, P.E. Traffic En, inter cc Mr. Joe Kicak City Engineer City of Grand Terrace LC.;AT!C?i. -11• 81, 82, 83 84 (to June) UULL1OlUn U(aonAM PALM AVENUE ND BARTON ROAD NO. ACCIDENTS BY TYPE tpt�l ►W-%P 04MAA1 wWav "5 2 3 77� PALM AVENUE 0 ,4o•t*" 0AP&M apt ® ruse• �ccxe*r C X H I T 13 1 T A LEGEND .�p.�-.. wc►e•or „w, - OIt I! 2 3 © ►+owty vt"Mt 0 mitt* omcr ��. ouT a co."m .11 E.,XHiBIT D• 'CO 47 lop— P / F7/R-0n/ '� �- :- - - _ �_` _..='�..2'sP,4crwc. - -'- — -- r•. _.._-• -- -- ---- ---- - .. - - - All -I ir REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS o CE :AM,C PAVEMENT MARKERS REGULATORY SIGNS In R2 03 ce 47 RIO all R13 R1S 016 R166 R17 RIG RIBA 419 a" y�•�,� WEIGHT fS7,L, EDENDKEEP r ,nF y4Y "NO_ �RiGHTLA?lEM'T\'I RIGHT MUST MUST N= I wlwleT S _L FiGN1 I! Iq 17T .r[co . �:.� �� {{TURN1 ruRNRIGNr )( TIT 4. C^ tIOA EXIT „uw 161 .off _.Y a• 1NORiLl11 ROL F nA�i_.� y Ri6A RI7A RIl A ■21 424 226 226A 026■ R27 R29 126A 929 030 431 R32 234 R35 837 tie Ims(s)) t39 to IONS Ny i I !" r,a•=n © �., i� tour[ I.J]e .� {. r. ) J =I �,..I 1..;. b •� i:I�.f �__��cu: �O V r--R22S7 02•?6((s)) R26A;.) R26G A27A 426(S) R26A(S) R130 30A �t••31(S) TURN `I .•.. +.tl L:.� 4 i' ( No 1 l.0 �'i ) ali �j ' L./, • 2341 `�J rti I I A n.\„ I.'.Nr Y � I �: 1. Y•-� /! h Y 1 i d x, �• RAl 243 ta•, R47 ,• ; RtGMT L_J EM BAN-'1 $500 FINE TURN Pn,:r.w,: FOR ONLY Raa ONLY } LITTERING BKY.ItS r • CYC:(S r[tin:6t1; 6 r R61 Rp3 967 969 R69 jj DO �i � � F ASSING �c■crrri LANE AICAO IV. 1•..[+ �.� 067A t50 032 *54 R56 RS7 TURNOUT I/,3 MILE I[ SLOWER TRAFFIC USE TURNOUTS ' ""' tic„AL � SLOLl. R TRAFFIC K 'c-- E P 8EG(N FREEWAY Rs, TURNOUT RlG?i7 Ru END FREEWAY R71 074 R74(u) pal 206 tHEN �t L tlUSES ANU ON LLFI CAR POOLS 272 ARRNLY OW ONLY ON LEFT .ON "AN NJ TURN ARROW ONLY R59 a" 260A r 41 ONLY ..STUN • I ` 89S R94 297 toe a" '�F► I tag NO w rlo 4C r[Ill L"L NO 495A R96A ►ARMING , 29YA , zc'. WARNING SIGNS WI W1 w] wa Wa WIT W14 Wa W7 wa W• 1N7 J W10 <0> <S> <S> /,�✓•,ate Z_, 6J ii > < < > 1� t W1a VMS will, wit W13 W25 W16 W29A W29A Wal W31 < 07 > ROAG "� SOfT ENU xARRORs �S 10'LO[R PAYE1tENT NARROW DIVIDED DSVFDED t> E�j,p pip ENDS dRFDG ROAD ROAD < > STJ� Y;EED �x AWES^I AiiEAO cast Wtla W290 wags waa wa w.] was wau was was was � w12 wsa wsaa wsa IN IS IZ-6 ` l� tCv ii [ltr.t� R Ft r,tiuCnSUiE .ota NO �� I.aoucr WTLCT � fL000L �` toe GCA.vs nallt 7�t::E, TWO WAY AN:AC - TRAFFIC waa W ]a ♦ - =• W aaa t W1. WOO WM wss wss w+a ! waa WAS Wsa W6 7 WM ' � , SC1100E E �R, p L _' � •P 4.1! 1 Ht•d�' o /t� ►ti�y tl01 Sly/ $CFiDOL �� ' 1t c � $CMOJL XFNG c W06A W60 » •o wsa w7s w !•] w7V Wa0 was W7t END>S EXIT ?IiR>1 LANs FREEWAY T;. ^,FTfC TRAFFIC ENDS a ri is Ta{EFtGE MERGE J �I2 MI �'I"�+D I aA ® LEFT LEFT r�e>•l4i , TT►a a Ttr/a ► Tel trn ► tr/, a WARNING SIGNS USED IN CONSTRUCTION ZONES SMALL HAVE ORANGE BACKGROUND. 1! 3= EWgLK CIF- N to N � + �'i 0 -a ci -i a Z ti LDS m -- -- - 60 l...— 7 RAF S/G N 14, S9� �ti COiy N� 7. s�v SCALE 1 0 z 51 � EX15T• LtMN� SIGN RZ l3 PsEo TSYp• ,7,fYP. .r .. pAtNTE ' WHITE N RZ t4p3 ' 0 Ltµt'C SIG S E ST. SIGN tE Ri Dou 1"✓ SOl,Z) YFL 1.0w i #%%-* JI v 1 . K I CA K AND ASSOCI CIVIL ENGINEERS I ' 22365 BARTON ROAD, SUITE 110 GRAND -TERRACE CA. 92324 (714) 825-3825 STQ4,FF REPW-T �50 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: October 25, 1984 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9A SUBJECT: FIRE STATION LEASE BETWEEN CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA 38 OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, LOCATION 22852 CITY CENTER COURT, GRAND TFRRACF, CAITFORNTA FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Background: The City of Grand Terrace has leased to County Service Area 38, a 4,480 square foot building with surrounding land of approximately .84 acres for the purpose of providing fire protection services, for the sum of $6,000 per year to be paid in 12 payments of $500 each. The term of the lease begins September 1, 1984, and extends through August 31, 1989. This lease cancels and supersedes Lease No. 84-125 that was terminated August 31, 1984. The term of this lease covers a period of five (5) years. San Bernardino County has agreed to pay approximately $375,295 for the construction of this facility out of tax increment. This equals about one-half of the total cost of the fire station which was $750,588, including the land. Due to our very low cost of fire protection for 1983-84 of approximately $70,000 and the excellent fire and emergency medical treatment, it is felt that Grand Terrace is fortunate having the California Department of Forestry under the CSA 38 performing our fire and paramedic services. Staff recommends that the Council: A. APPROVE THE ATTACHED CONTRACT. B. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST IT. Note: This contract has been reviewed by County Counsel and our City Attorney for legal sufficiency and form. SA:ac Encl. Contract between County of San Bernardino Forestry and Fire Warden and the City of Grand Terrace for ease of Fire Station r4 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL FOR COUNTY USE ONLY County Department Contract Number Forestry and Fire Ward County Department Contract Representative Contractor's License Number Howard Wright 2707 Ph Ext. Budget Unit No. Sub-0blect No. Fund No I JoD No. 7of Contract If contract has more than one payment or receipt, Projpct Name: complete the following: 12 Payments Estimate' $ 5 0 0 Approximate Amount Each Contractor: City of Grand Terrace Birth Date Federal ID No. or Social Security No. Contractor's Representative: Seth Armstead, City Manager Address: 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Phone: 824-6621 Nature of Contract: (firefly describe the general terns of the contract.) '.'he city of Grand Terrace will lease to County Service Area 38, a 4,480 square foot building with surrounding land of approximately. .84 acre for the purpose of providing fire protection services, for the sum of $6,000 per year to be paid in 12 payments of $500 each per year. The term of the lease begins September 1, 1984, and extends through August 31, 1989. This lease cancels and supersedes Lease No. 84-125 that was terminated August 31, 1984. (Attach this *ran;n7,ttjl to all contracts not prepared on the "St3ndard Contract" torn ) APP101e-1 as t7 Legal Forrn � V,oy Co..nser Revie.roed as to Aff,rrnatr�e Acton sli- Pe. e.%ed •or Process.ng III. :. r�m,n sirat or;G40 Dnfe Date Date GTC# C O N T R A C T This contract is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Grand Terrace, hereafter called the City, and County Service Area 38 of the County of San Bernardino, hereafter called CSA 38. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: The City hereby leases to CSA 38 the following described premises: 1. Premises Demised: Grand Terrace Fire Station No. 1, a 4,480 square foot building which will accommodate fire engines. The surrounding land is approximately .84 acres, more or less. Location known as 22582 City Center Court, Grand Terrace, California. Legal description: Parcel 4, Parcel Map No. 6462, in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, is per map recorded in Book 77, Pages 55 and 56, records of San Bernardino County. Assessor's Parcel No. 277-161-30 2. Use: The demised premises shall be occupied and used by CSA 38 during the term thereof solely for the purpose of providing fire protection services and services as are related thereto. 3. Term and Rental: The term of this lease covers a period of five (5) years beginning September 1, 1984, and ending August 31, 1989, at a total rental of six thousand and no/100 dollars ($6,000) per year in lawful money of the United States payable as follows; in monthly installments of five hundred and no/100 dollars ($500) each and every month during the term hereof, not in advance. 4. Hold Over: In the event CSA 38 shall hold over and continue to occupy the demised premises with the consent of the City, expressed or implied, the tenancy shall he deemed to be a tenancy from month -to -month upon the same terms and conditions as existed and prevailed at the time of the termination of the term of this lease. Said month -to -month tenancy may be terminated by either party upon written notice given sixty (60) days prior to the effective date of termination. Interior: It is agreed City shall, at its own expense make all necessaryr repairs or replacement, including glass replacement of exterior windows, not broken by CSA 38 employees or its invitees, and damages resulting from defective or faulty plumbing lines leading from the main sewer to the building, any failure of the electrical system which would require replacement of main panel, or replacement of burnt out or defective water heaters; any and all damages to leased premises caused by or resulting from an act of God. CSA 38 shall be'responsible for the normal maintenance of the interior --of the building and the normal maintenance of the heating and air conditioning units, it being understood and agreed, however, that should the said heai'ing and/or air conditioning unit fail to function through no fault of CSA 38, City shall be solely responsible for its repair or replacement, and covenants to make such repairs or replace- ment within a reasonable time after notification of malfunction. In addition, CSA 38 shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of all interior furnishings, including major appliances. 7. Installation and Maintenance of Improvements: CSA 38 shall have the right, during the existence of this lease, to install shelving, improvements and fixtures on the demised premises. Improvements shall include, but not be limited to, construction of sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, and fences. CSA 38 shall have the responsibility and obligation to maintain in good condition all driveways, parking areas, landscaping, sprinklers and sprinkling systems, and other improvements to the grounds of the demised premises. Improvements and fixtures which are permanently attached to the building shall become the pro- perty of the City and shall not be removed from the premises by CSA 38 at the termination of this lease or any extension. 8. Utilities: City shall furnish, at its cost, water and sewer service; CSA 38 shall pay for all electricity, gas, telephone, trash pick-up and janitorial services furnished to building. 9. Liability: CSA 38 shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all liability arising out of any act or omission of CSA 38 for injury to persons and damage to property to or upon the de- mised premises, including the property of CSA 38 and the persons and property of CSA 38's servants, agents or business invitees. 10. Liability: The City shall indemnify, defend and hold CSA 38 harmless from any and all liability arising out of any act or omission of the City for injury to persons and damage to property to or upon the demised premises, including property of the City and the persons and property of the City's servants, agents or business invitees. 11. Subletting: CSA 38 will not assign, mortgage or hypothecate this lease, or any interest therein, or let or sublet the whole or any part of said premises or make, or suffer any alteration to be made, in or on said premises, or devote the same to any different use that are above described, without, in each instance, first obtaining the written consent of City. - 2 - M 12. Signs: CSA 38 will display from the windows and/or exterior of the demised premises only such sign or signs as are permitted by City Ordinances. 13. Insurance: City shall insure or self -insure the premises, including improvements, furniture and furnishings, as deemed adequate by the City, and shall provide public liability and property damage insurance as it determines 'to be necessary. CSA 38 shall be named as an additional co-insured on any insurance obtained by City pursuant to this paragraph. CSA 38 shall insure or self -insure the fire appara- tus used in the performance of this Agreement in an amount deemed ad- equate by it. 14. Damage or Destruction: If during the said term, or any extension thereof, the premises shall be destroyed by fire, earthquake or the elements, or are partially destroyed, so as to render the same wholly unfit for occupancy, then at the option of the City or of CSA 38, exercised within thirty (30) days after such destruction occurs, this lease shall cease and become null and void from the date of such de- struction, and CSA 38 shall imamediately surrender and yield up said premises and all interest therein to the City, and shall not be liable for any further payments of rent on account of said lease; but in case the parties shall jointly elect not to terminate the said lease, as aforesaid, and shall elect to restore the premises, the City may re- enter and possess said premises, or such portion thereof as may be necessary to make such restoration, and in such case, the rent received hereunder, or a fairly proportionate part thereof, determined by the nature and extent of the damage, shall be rebated to CSA 38, during the period while said repairs are being made, but CSA 38 shall in no case be entitled to compensation or damages on account of any inconvenience or annoyance in making said repairs, on account of damage or destruction, except the rebate of rental, as hereinabove provided, and no allowance or deduction of rent whatever shall be made for a partial destruction or damage to said premises which does not prevent CSA 38 from carrying on business even though it may be inconvenienced thereby. 15. Default: City hereby is granted the right to cancel this lease if and wherever CSA 38 shall continue in default in the perform- ance of any of its obligations herein (with the exception of the payment of rent as herein specified) for a period of thirty (30) days from and after written demand, given by the City to CSA 38, for the perform- ance of such obligations as breached by CSA 38, together with notice of City's intention to cancel the lease for such continuance of said breach. A notice period of ten days shall be applicable with respect to the payment of any rent due hereunder. 16. Remedies -Cumulative: All remedies granted by this lease to either party shall be deemed to be cumulative and shall not deprive either party of any other remedy granted by law. 17. Notices: All notices to be given between the parties hereto shall be in writing and served personally or by depositing the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid and registered, and addressed - 3 - n COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Chairman, Board of Supervisors Dated A'-PTEST: De ity Cier'-. of the .:o.ard Qr Ju:)er; isors Approved as to Legal Form: ��-. -y Counsel J .- CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Mayor Dated ATTEST: C'ty Clerk Approved as to Form: City T%tt:=cy «4;i J+.r:_t rS ; r+kl ,r;ti;s.'r•^A {: y 4'i! �4_: ..t,r ,Jtiw �,•f;.lp ..y.�.5 �r � i ! `k� '. .i +' w; a ��". s.i .*.3tsl �!'r.:a Mt �YZtr uate: October 16, 1985 STAFF REPORT 12-8.8002 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM FX ) MEETING DATE: -October 25, 1984 AGENDA ITEM NO. -C- SUBJECT: Zone Change Ordinance Areas 1, 2, and 26 B-1 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The City Council previously has directed the Staff to return to the Council with separate Zone Change Ordinances for the subject areas. The purpose of the Zone Change is to have the zoning and the General Plan conform. Attached you will find three (3) separate Ordinances covering Area 1 being changed from R-1 to M-2, and Area 2 being changed from A-1 to M-2. The City Council directed the Staff to contact the property owners in Area 26 B. In our discussions with the affected property owners, they have expressed interest in breaking out Area 26B into 2 zones, 26-B-1 and 26-B-2. The property owners within Area 26-B-1 expressed the desire to have their property zoned the same as 26-A-1. which is R-1, ]ow density residential with 2-4 units per acre. The property owners in Area 26-B-2 felt that that area should retain its present zoning, which is A-1. Since A-1 zoning is consistent with the land use designation of low density residential, no zone change is required and therefore, no Ordinance is being proposed for the Council's consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDS: 1. MOTION TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING OF ZONE CHANGE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE. 2. MOTION TO ADOPT FIRST READING OF ZONE CHANGE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY FOR AREAS 1, 2, and 26 B-1. JK/lh n u ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace approved a General Plan Update on April 26, 1984; and WHEREAS, said General Plan Update resul tcd in vari cols zoning wi t�i n tip,-, City of Grand Terrace not being in compliance with said ever l flan Update as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace to study and to bring said zoning into compliance with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on this matter on August 6, 1984, in the time and manner required by law at which all evidence and testimony was duly heard and considered; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended zoning amendments as described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the recommended zoning amendments are consistent and conform with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace as updated on April 26, 1984; and WHEREAS, the zoning amendments have been reviewed and analyzed as to environmental impact, and a Negative Declaration has been duly issued in the time, form, and manner prescribed by law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the real properties as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein, are hereby rezoned and the zoning amended as shown on said Exhibits. SECTION 2. Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the sfday after its adoption. SECTION 3. Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three '(3) public places designated for such purpose by the City Council. SECTION 4. First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 25th day of October, 1984, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1984. n n ATTEST: y Clerk of the My of ran Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor of the y of grandTerrace and of the City Council thereof. I, Myrna Erway, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1984, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: ity ttorney E -2- City er 11 n n LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE AREA NO. 1 All that portion of Lots 1,2,3,4 & 5 as shown on maps of Terra Bella Tract on file in Book 17 of Maps, Page 40, Records of the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at intersection of centerlines of Walnut _ r_reet and Terrace Avenue, per said Terra Bella Tract; THENCE Northeasterly, along said centerline of Terrace Avenue, to the intersection of said centerline with the centerline of Vivienda Avenue; THENCE Southeasterly, along said centerline of Vi-vienday ,avenue through all it's various courses, to the intersection of said centerline with the centerline of Maple Avenue; THENCE Southeasterly, along said centerline of Maple Avenue, to the intersection of said centerline iwth the centerline of Walnut Avenue; THENCE Westerly, along said centerline of Walnut Avenue, to the intersection of said centerline with said centerline of Terrace Avenue, being also the Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom any portion of the parcels described herein contained within the Right -of -Way of the Streets named above. ORDINANCE NO. j AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF j GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace approved a General Plan Update on April 26, 1984; and WHEREAS, said General Plan Update resulted in various zoning witnin the City of Grand Terrine not being in cor-plian(.e -;rith .,aid rr._rai clan Update as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace to study and to bring said zoning into compliance with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on this matter on August 6, 1984, in the time and manner required by law at which all evidence and testimony was duly heard and considered; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended zoning amendments as described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the recommended zoning amendments are consistent and conform with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace as updated on April 26, 1984; and WHEREAS, the zoning amendments have been reviewed and analyzed as to environmental impact, and a Negative Declaration has been duly issued in the time, form, and manner prescribed by law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLGYIS: SECTION 1. That the real properties as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein, are hereby rezoned and the zoning amended as shown on said Exhibits. SECTION 2. Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31-sl7ay after its adoption. SECTION 3. Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places designated for such purpose by the City Council. SECTION 4. First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 25th day of October, 1984, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1984. F1 ATTEST: y Clerk of the City of 6rand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor ofCity of GrandTerrace and of the City Council thereof. I, t-lyrna Erway, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1984, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: City Attorney WAI City Clerk 1 n A F] LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE AREA NO. 2 All those portions of Lot 39 of Jurupa Rancho, as per map on file in Book 1 of Maps, Page 47; and Lot 4, Block 88 of Rancho San Bernardino as per map on file in Book 7 of Maps, Page 2, and Block "A" of Resubdivision of C-rand Terrace Tract as per matt on file in Book 1 of Record of Surveys rage 33, all :.ecor'ds of the Pecoraer of man Bernardino County, California, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Northerly Right -Of -Way line of Vivienda Avenue and the Easterly Right -of -Way of Terrace Avenue, said intersection also being the Southwest corner of that certain parcel conveyed to B & R Partnership, a limited partnership by Grant Deed recorded February 25, 1982 as Instrument No. 82-036755, Official Records of said San Bernardino County, California; THENCE Northerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way line, being also along the Westerly line of said B & R Partnership parcel, to the Northwest corner of said B & R Partnership parcel; THENCE Easterly along the Northerly line of said B & R Partnership parcel to the Northeast corner thereof, being also the common corner to the Northwest corner of that certain parcel conveyed to Donald E. Banta and Pamela A. Banta, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants by Individual Grant Deed recorded July 12, 1976, in Book 8966, Page 102, Official Records of said San Bernardino County, California; THENCE continuing Easterly along the Northerly line of said Banta Parcel to the intersection of said Northerly line with the boundary line between the Jurupa Rancho and Rancho San Bernardino, said point bears North 20' West, a distance of 487.8 feet from Station No. 2 of said Rancho San Bernardino; THENCE North 200 West, along said boundary line between said Rancho's to a point thereon said point bears North 20° West, a distance of 489.27 feet from said Station No. 2; THENCE South 890 41' East 513.47 feet to a point on the westerly boundary line of the Southern California Motor Railroad; THENCE South 90 03' West a distance of 323.49 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 4 that is North 66° 15' East a distance of 321 feet measured along said southerly line, from the southwest corner of said Lot 4; LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE AREA NO. 2 Continued THENCE North 660 15' East on said southerly line a distance of 9.22 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly line of the Pacific Electric Railroad right of way, 100.00 feet wide; THENCE Southerly along said Westerly line to the intersection of said Westerly I_ne with said northerly ?i ht o Way __ne or `Ii a Avenue; THE14CE Westerly along said Northerly Right -of -Way line through all it's various courses to the Point of Beginning. ORDINANCE NO. j AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF j GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OF APRIL 26, 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace approved a General Plan Update on April 26, 1984; and ,aid G�_ner'al Plan Up,3t? r'-,sul ,--d in `:.r] 1 zon1nq ;/i ,'1ln tie r i ty of 'rand Thrace not t i n- i rl co7pl wi :h i it d '.'r I''.1 } _I Up�ate as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace to study and to bring said zoning into compliance with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on this matter on August 6, 1984, in the time and manner required by law at which all evidence and testimony was duly heard and considered; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended zoning amendments as described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the recommended zoning amendments are consistent and conform with the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace as updated on April 26, 1984; and WHEREAS, the zoning amendments have been reviewed and analyzed as to environmental impact, and a Negative Declaration has been duly issued in the time, form, and manner prescribed by law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the real properties as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein, are hereby rezoned and the zoning amended as shown on said Exhibits. SECTION 2. Effective Date - This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31s ay after its adoption. SECTION 3. Posting - The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places designated for such purpose by the City Council. SECTION 4. First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 25th day of October, 1984, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1984. u 1! ATTEST: y Clerk of t e City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor of the City of Mnd Terrace and of the City Council thereof. I, Myrna Err:ay, City Clerk of the City of Grand 'terrace, do here`vy certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 1984, by the following vote: AYES: TOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: ,ty Attorney -2- City ClerR 16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONE CHANGE AREA 26-B-1 All that portion of the Southwest 1/4, Northeast 1/4, Southwest 1/4, Section 4, Township 2, South Range 4, West S.B.B. & M., in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California (Containing 9.7 acres more or less). SLAFF REPQR-1 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: 10-25-84 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9E(1) SUBJECT: Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement - Amendment regarding the Treasurer and Controller FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED _X Attached is a copy of a proposed amendment to the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement which designates the Omnitrans General Manager to serve as Treasurer, and the Omnitrans Director of Accounting to serve as Controller for the Agency. If the City approves the amendment, a motion is required to authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL: MOTION TO APPROVE (DISAPPROVE) THE AMENDMENT TO THE OP1NITRANS JOINT PO4:ERS AGREEMENT DESIGNATING THE OMNITRANS GENERAL MANAGER TO SERVE AS TREASURER, AND THE OP1NITRANS DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING AS CONTROLLER, AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT. ME i 0 Lee Tr�Vers-_,' Upland City Manager Upland City Hall 460 worth Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 February 16, 1984 Re: Amendment to J.P.A. - Treasurer and Controller Dear Mr. Travers: At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on the 3rd day of August, 1983, said Board approved the amendment to the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement to designate the Omnitrans General Manager to serve as TREASURER, and the Omnitrans Director of Account- ing to serve as CONTROLLER for the agency. Enclosed is the original and a copy of this proposed amendment. Please obtain the necessary signatures on both documents, and return them to this office as soon as possible. After all signatures have been affixed, a fully executed copy of this amendment will be forwarded to you. Very truly yours, ROBERT E. CHAFIN, GENERAL MANAGER REC:mrc Encls. 2 1700 WEST 5th STREET • SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92411 • TELEPHONE (714) 88 AMENDMENT T JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT b WEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN'BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO AND UPLAND CREATING A COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OMNITRANS" THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for convenience on the 1st day of October, 1983, is entered. into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and the CITIES of CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO? RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all of which are bodies politic in the State of California. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties forming OM.NITRANS, a joint powers authority, desire to amend the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement to provide for the General Manager to be the Treasurer of Omnitrans and for. the Director of Accounting to be the Controller of Omnitrans; • NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement agree as follows: 1. Section 3.D. of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement dated March 8, 1976 is hereby amended, effective upon approval cf this Amendment by all member agencies of OMNITRANS, to read as follows: "Section 3.D. Of {,cers the Board shall select a Chairman, a Vice Chairman, and other necessary officials. The Secretary shall be the General Manager of Omnitrans. The Treasurer of the Authority shall be the General Manager of Omnitrans who shall be the depositary and have custody of all money of the Authority from whatever sources. Omnitrans' Director of Accounting Paqe 1 of 4 shall be the Controller of the Authority and shall draw all warrants to pay demands against the Authority. The Attorney for the Authority shall be designated by the Board. The public officers or persons who have charge of, handle or have access to any property of the Authority shall file an official bond in accordance with Section 6505.1 of the California Government Code.. The Authority shall have the authority to appoint or employ such other officers, employees, consultants, advisors, and independent contractors as it may deem necessary." 2. 1�11 cther provisions of the Onnitrans Joint Bowers Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and erect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date and year first above written. Dated: A?"rBS^ Clerk of the Board Dated° City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk COUNTY OF SALT B E RNARDINO Chairman, Board of Supervisors C 1, 12y or CHINO 00-0 Mayor CITY OF COLTON Mayor M n Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: A T TE'S T : Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated ATTE City Clerk City Clerk Dated: October 2, 1984 ATTEST. City Clerk CITY OF FONTANA Mayor CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Mayor CITY OF LOMA LINDA Mavor CITY OF MONTCLAIR Mayor CITY OF ONTARIO Mayor CITY OF RANCHO Cru"CrIX.O'NGA Mayor CITY OF REDLANDS - Mayor Pace I of 4 r Dated: CITY OF RIALTO ATTEST: City Clerk r Dated: . AT B�EST . City ,Clerk Mayor Dated: c�.� �� CITY OF UPLAND Mayor t.r•i�, • <■%'PiJi { _ is rti� ,��"y+�' Ky •i s \ } a `y��/L •y . �a• d 7 s r t ' ti {q�.�� :�^ •� F0 ^ i:»wfnl��•`�y.T+s _M"'3,...'r@; :r.-.i�t5l�:��3,��i�`�'A�i��.. F , ;.i. �• .�'•5L"�`�j� } � •; Page 4 of 4 .4 &STDAFF REPOT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( X) MEETING DATE: 10-25-84 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9E(2) SUBJECT: Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement - Amendment regarding the Weighted Ballot FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED _X_ Attached is a copy of a proposed amendment to the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement regarding the Weighted Ballot. If the City approves the amendment, a motion is required to authorize the t'ayor to execute the amengment. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL: MOTION TO APPROVE (OR DISAPPROVE) THE AMENDMENT TO THE OMNITRANS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, SECTION 3.B., WEIGHTED BALLOT, TO BE BASED UPON POPULATION, AND AUTHORIZE THE t"AYOR TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT. t✓ E ,. �e� .. •t ' • �' ,��{e, � � c�•Y � r < ��qg' 'L`Eq,�► tf�,[, •t. J.�yr� ��,_ ,�. �e ��l ,g� ':y 'L 4 +:'. .r•, ,pia• "" _ r'' '- • f. '$• .. - T>._.'• v � i M, a,. .K t . _ s f • y October 18, 1984 Mayor Hugh Grant Grand Terrace City Hall 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 Dear Vayor Grant: At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on the 1Cth day of October, 1934, said Board approved an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement, Section 3.B., weighted Ballot, to be based upon population. Enclosed is the agreement, together with the breakdown of the weighted vote, which must be approved by your City Council. After approval has been given by your Council, please affix your signature, and that of your City Clerk's. Please notify this office when this document- has been fully executed. Your very truly, ROBERT E. CHAFI REC : mrc ..°• •s , .(''•a� 7.�; r 5,,N iiuu f �li' i�1'S':,�p�.i'"�'ii' ate. _ •F„ • .'. �n'3'" V.,ry - 'D• , •.�e'Jstg'i�R�.. "_ .'l•,•N:. a '�+. is ,,y .,�,7'..i.ls .*"iw AF ,};`t-�".�. • .w t •tr t.;,+$P.r: ..�'"-. •- ^'�. a,. 4,,R,�. ,Y.• .'f' i3`=`,>h _,t ,t „•�`.: �• e r •�J"' . .. 1700 VVEST 5th STREET • SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92411 • TELEPHONE (714) 889-0811 :1 AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO AND UPLAND CREATING A COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OMNITRANS" THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for convenience on the 1st day of October, 1984, is entered into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and the CITIES of CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all of which are bodies politic in the State of California. G, I T N E S S E T H: P,HE:?EhS, the parties forming OMNITRANS, a joint powers authority, desire to amend the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement to provide for changes to the calculation of weighted vote entitlements of member agencies of OMNITRANS; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement agree as follows: 1. Section 3.B. of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement dated March 8, 1976 is hereby amended, effective upon approval of t-h-is Amcnument by ali member agencies of O:NITRANS, to reac3 its fG1J.o( 5: "Section 3.B. Vr)ti nri Each member �oj�fg�rr� the Boa_ z.d of . Directors. shall �n.:� �Y'ay y:�'`�,k�n'.1_ 7*.. • i..�.�y( .@•! +`�S. �� s< °F��r'%'�4,��..�i,��..E� . �r _ K� .. 'i.� ..d�i: ., �4 a � �. - R��C:,�� .+4�s�?��J'.1;�?+�.�J�`�i4Y� + .t �, ,5. ,��%�•:`e�� -. C; .e 3.. _ � e ., _ �..g;'., 'z call of any Board member, a weighted voting shall be used with weighted votes calculated as follows: Weighted vote entitlements shall be calculated based upon population. Each member agency shall receive one vote for each one percent (1%) of the total population of the OMNITRANS service area that resides within the member agency's jurisdictional Page 1 of 5 area. If the population percentage computation of a member agency results in a partial vote, the weighted vote calculation shall be made by rounding upward for population calculations of one-half percent (1/2%) or more, and rounding downward for population calculations of less than one-half percent (1/2%) except that no member agency shall have less than one vote when weighted voting occurs. The Controller shall compute the weighted vote entitlement for each member agency as of the preceding July 1st based on the most recent Department of Finance Population Statements. The entitlement for the County of San Bernardino shall b_ deter,,i-e,3 by utilizing the most- recent :t_, rlann:.ng Dcparti%ent inioT,-!a`lon :.. HcatinJ percentage of unincorporated population of the County residing within the service area of Omnitrans. In the event that the "off the top" funding method first approved by the Omnitrans Board of Directors for the 1983-84 fiscal year is no longer used by Omnitrans, then weighted voting entitlements shall thereafter be calculated in the manner that existed prior to this Amendment to the 0:. n.i trans Joint Powers Agreement. Weighted vote entitlements of each member agency shall be computed by the Controller cesignated in Section 3.D. of this agree:r.`nt onj -quoh rmmmitatinns will control .in....detexminin.. County is entitled shall be divided equally among those Supervisors present. The weighted votes of any single representative shall not be split. The weighted voting of any single member agency shall not, of itself, constitute a majority vote. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the Page 2 of 5 membership of the Board of Directors, except that all County representatives on the Board of Directors shall be counted as one for the purpose of establishing a quorum. Less than a quorum may adjourn from time to time. All actions taken by the Board shall require a majority vote of the members present, with a quorum in attendance, provided, however, that adoption of By-laws, Amendment of By-laws, adoption of an annual budget and such other matters as the Board may designate shall require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Board (majority of total weighted votes of all parties if weighted voting is called Fv -i ''.^. a t�=nt:-G", consi,re�] ne—t.1' '1 aL-f_rI—alive nor a negariv, vote, but the pre:;e; of the member abstaining shall be counted in determining whether or not there is a quorum in attendance." 2. All other provisions of the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper cf`icers t11 c reuc;t., culy & utho-, i zrc as of the date any? y_ar a irst above c,rittF--n. Dated: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO �. �` - . r, -, ... _ � � `: •;,-C.1.e �c�k:_�o�: � :�h�. �os�r�� .�,�,_r��.��-�_�.�:y:.a: � :...�:a.��.�.�an��°�5��Y i s Q � ..,, Dated: CITY OF CHINO ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 3 of 5 Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk DateC? City Cler CITY OF COLTON Mayor CITY OF FONTANA Mayor CITY OF GRAND TERRACE M--yor CITY OF LOMA LINDA Mayor CITY OF MONTCLAIR Mayor CITi OF 0", O fie. �f. • X _ i* `„ .. :'� �•�-� O_t. J.. • 4 .... - 1r rE _ i Y City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Page 4 of 5 Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk 4 CITY OF REDLANDS Mayor CITY OF RIALTO Mayor CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Mayor C- i 1 01 U- L'.i:D Mayor ".. 'fir 'i' C•-.•y •� .'p � f• a '� y .� .. :�.. ._ y� .t r,. :,�- "� :�_, Page 5 of 5 �111111iL'R7fl� INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: September 28, 1984 TO: Members of OMNITRANS Board of Directors FROM: Warren A. Knudson, OMNITRANS Controller SUBJECT: OfralITRPURS Board Weighted Vote C c� ti n on f`" 1' ' rC .i? -': U' + �rl" i'' era 0 :} S3 �' _ cul a ti on be based upon PO;PULAT101ti ui "kJ +i r+ a t,ro year pe r i o To cc -:- ply with the stated Board action, a new calculation of the weighted vote has been made. Attached is a schedule comparing the new calculation to the most recent weighted vote calculation (population/assets). Below is the proposed weighted vote by jurisdiction: San Bernardino County 22 Chino 6 Colton 3 Fontana 6 r . ' 1 err�ce 1 i.c:"c 1 ' nca 1 wont lair Ontario 13 Rancho Cucamona 8 Pedlands 6 J4ii �� rir?� nJ l :.' 1+ Upland. 7_ . Ale" — Warren A. Knudson OMNITRANS Controller WAK:rw Attachment 1700 WEST 5TH STREET 0 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92411 0 TELEPHONE (714) 889 0811 4. S,. OF GINIr"""' BOPM WKGI= VOTE BAS"') (2'! POPULATION Most Percent of ro,-,UJ.,i 'k'on Recent Percent of Total (�d Weighted Most Recent JunIsdicti ro"ul-,ation: Population: Vote:* Weighted Vote San Bernard --..C-cimtY 173,233 22.3 22 356 41.0 Ch:Lno 4'5,847 5.9 6 26 3.0 Colton 2-3,331 3.0 3 28 3.2 Fontana a 1;5,500 5.9 6 16 1.8 Grand Terr 9,651 1.2 1 6 0.7 Lana Linda 11,214 1.4 1 8 0.9 Montclair 24,695 3.2 3 33 3.8 Ontario -f,174 13.4 13 57 6.6 Rancho Cu a 61,624 7.9 8 15 1.7 Redlands 48,934 6.3 6 40 4.6 Rialto 11,14,101 5.7 6 25 2.9 San Berna City 131,030 16.9 17 225 25.9 Upland 51,983 6.7 7 34 3.9 TOTAL: 775,322 100.0 100 869 100.0 City popu from 1/l/84 FYDF estimates County pop' ion from County Population -Housing Bullet'Iti, J,-m- 1984 From S Controller 5/26/82 LIF� -1 In