The URL can be used to link to this page

05/26/199422795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 Civic Center (909)824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 Byron R. Matteson Mayor Ronald M. Christianson Mayor Pro Tempore f Gene Carlstrom Herman Hilkey Jim Singley Council Members Thomas J. Schwab City Manager FILE COPY May 26, 1994 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursday - 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road Call to Order - * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance - * Roll Call - CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 05/12/94 Minutes 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA052694 10 • • IAA Z0 VW4R_:3:4b1Dk%W*_�IDO_4z :- . Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Recycling Family of the Month - April 1994 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time with- out discussion. Any Councilmember, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. May 26, 1994 6:00 P.M. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approve Approve A. Approve Check Register No. 052694 I Approve B. Ratify 05/26/94 CRA Action C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D. Approve 05/12/94 Minutes Approve COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA I STAFF I COUNCIL 05/26/94 - Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION B. Landscaping and Street Lighting Approve District 89-1 FY 1994-95 Levy of Assessment C. Participation in Development Approve of an East Valley Transportation Demand Forecast Model CLOSED SESSION A. City Manager Performance Evaluation ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 9, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 06/09/94 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 06/02/94. PENDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MAY 12, 1994 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on May 12, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. (br PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Chairman Gene Carlstrom, Vice -Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, Secretary Bernard Simon, Finance Director Joann Lombardo, Interim Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: Jim Singley, Agency Member Dan Buchanan, Agency Member Joe Kicak, City Engineer Lt. Rodney Hoops, Sheriff's Department rAPPROVAL OF A' _ Rs MIM= CRA-94-22 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBERS SINGLEY AND BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve the April 28, 1994 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NUMBER CRA051294 CRA-94-23 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CARLSTROM, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBERS SINGLEY AND BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve Check Register Number CRA051294. Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA meeting at 6 :10 p.m., until the next regular City Council/CRA meeting, which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, May 26, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace C R A AGENDA ITEM NO.1. PENDING C R A APPROVAL DATE: MAY 26,1994 CHECK REGISTER NO.052694 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK NO. VENDOR P9569 KICAK & ASSOCIATES P9578 UNITED STATES ESCROW P9579 BANK OF AMERICA 29250 n ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN 29254 m MARGARET AYARS 29256 DAN BUCHANAN 29257 GENE CARLSTROM v 29273 a HERMAN HILKEY 29282 BYRON MATTESON 29294 Z JAMES SINGLEY 0 29302 �j VISA f q_i-N 44 4-4COTI ENGINEERING SERVICE,HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM LOAN FROM HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM PURCHASE HOUSE AT 125985 MARADO ART WORK FOR CITY LOG, PICO PARK REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE, HOUSING REHABILITATION SEMINAR STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 SEMINAR, HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM AMOUNT $ 40.00 35,915.40 87,175.00 101.80 71.50 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.0( 639.14 $124,692.84 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOI THE OPERATION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. BERNARD SIMON 51 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1 PENDING CITY DATE: MAY 26, 1994 COUNCIL APPROVAL CHECK REGISTER NO: 052694 ------------------------ OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK NO. P9551 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P9552 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P9553 COMCAST CABLEVISION P9554 CARLA NIELSON P9555 BLANCHARD SIGNS P9556 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P9557 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P9558 8 JOANN LOMBARDO P9559 C LARRY MAINEZ P9560 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P9561 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P9562 COMCAST CABLEVISION P9563 PERS P9564 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P9565 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P9566 COMCAST CABLE VISION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/4/94 $ 446.21 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/4/94 126.80 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/4/94 89.31 TERMINATION PAY 413.71 BANNER FOR CITIZENS PATROL 59.69 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/6/94 457.49 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/6/94 79.91 TEMP. PLANNING DIRECTOR, 4/25-5/5/94 1,755.00 PLANNING TECHNICIAN, 4/25-5/6/94 670.05 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/10/94 172.06 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/10/94 166.55 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/10/94 107.24 RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 5/6/94 4,322.60 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/11/94 134.70 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/11/94 26.00 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 5/11/94 95.46 51 • 4 --1 Lip Cd 3 DATE: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK REGISTER NO:052694 --------------------------------------------------------------- OUTSTANDING DBNAND8 A8 OF: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 29243 JOAN EDGHILL REFUND, WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES $ 6.00 29244 JOHN AHLERICH REFUND, WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 24.00 29245 DAVID SCHIFFNER REFUND, WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 24.00 29246 BETTY GARCIA REFUND, WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 8.00 29247 WINKER SITANGGAND REFUND, WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 53.00 29248 AA EQUIPMENT RENTAL PARTS FOR LAWN MOWER 26.88 29249 A & A PRODUCE COMPANY PRODUCE FOR CHILD CARE 92.50 29250 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN FLYERS FOR CHILD CARE 235.40 29251 MATTHEW ADDINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 5/5/94 50.00 29252 MARGARET ALFORD REIMBURSEMENT FOR LOCAL MILEAGE 20.75 29253 BFI WASTE SYSTEMS REFUSE PICK-UP, SENIOR CENTER, MAY,1994 67.94 29255 BRUNICK,ALVEREZ & BATTERSBY FEES FOR LITIGATION ON BOOKING FEES 33.60 29256 DAN BUCHANAN STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 300.00 29257 GENE CARLSTROM STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1994 300.00 29258 CHILD CARE CENTER EMPLOYEE CHILD CARE FOR MARCH & JUNE, 1194 1,969.00 29259 CITY OF COLTON SERVICES FOR MAY, 1994 52,159.58 Cry 5 DATE: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK REGISTER NO:052694 _______________________________________________________________________________________ OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 29276 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES, PARKS $ 142.75 29277 INLAND COUNTIES INS, SVCS. LIFE/DENTAL INSURANCE FOR JUNE, 1994 713.03 29278 INMARK NAME PLATE,PLANNING COMMISSION 32.33 29279 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHONE FOR APRIL,1994 50.85 29280 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. LIFE INSURANCE FOR JUNE, 1994 290.95 29281 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. LIFE INSURANCE FOR JUNE, 1994 211.20 29282 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR MAY, 1194 300.00 29283 MCKENZIE-SCOTT COMPANY MAINTENANCE ON EQUIPMENT, CHILD CARE 249.50 29284 RAY MUNSON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, 5/5/94 50.00 29285 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH INSURANCE FOR JUNE, 1994 5,238.12 29286 PACIFIC BELL PHONES, CITY OWNED FACILITIES 295.95 29287 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH, CHILD CARE 185.94 29288 KATHY PIERSON INSTRUCTOR, TINY TUMBLERS/GYMNASTICS 639.80 29289 PRUDENTIAL SERVICES BUREAU HEALTH NETWORK INSURANCE FOR JUNE, 1994 746.36 29290 S.E. RYKOFF & COMPANY FOOD FOR CHILD CARE 706.05 29291 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STREET MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 228.05 �i Cd 7 DATE: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK REGISTER NO:052694 OIITSTANDING CHECKS A8 OF: MAY 26, 1994 CHECK NO. yENDO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. BERNARD SIMON FINANCE DIRECTOR PENDING CITY CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - MAY 12, 1994 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on May 12, 1994 at 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Gene Carlstrom, Mayor Pro Tempore Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Bernard Simon, Finance Director Joann Lombardo, Interim Community Development Director John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: Dan Buchanan, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Joe Kicak, City Engineer Lt. Rodney Hoops, Sheriff's Department The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Roger Greenwalt, 4 First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Hilkey. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6:00 P.M. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6:10 P.M. Council concurred to postpone Item 9A. (City Manager Performance Evaluation) to the May 26, 1994 City Council Meeting. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Proclamation - "Water Awareness Month" May 1994 Mayor Matteson read a proclamation declaring the month of May 1994 as "Water Awareness Month." 2B. Water Awareness Poster Contest Awards The Principal of Terrace View Elementary School, Maryetta Ferre, indicated that Riverside Highland Water Company, which adopted the Elementary School, COUNCIL AGENDA ITW # 3� Council Minutes - 05/12/94 Page 3 that B.F.I. is experimenting with a month -long pilot program where all disposables are thrown together and separated by an Ontario recycling company. He remarked that the garbage is placed on a conveyor belt and sorted. He commented that the company is examining the cost of the program and related that if the program is not cost-effective, the company will return to separating the recyclables during the pick up. He indicated that he will inform the public of the project's progress. Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom, clarified that trash and recyclables are still being collected by different trucks and encouraged citizens to continue separating their recyclables. He speculated that B.F.I. will report on the results within a few weeks. He indicated that the sidewalk installation on Mt. Vernon in front of the convalescent hospital is nearly complete, adding that about 100' feet remains. He questioned how the sidewalk was funded and inquired when it would be completed. r City Manager Schwab, responded that the City submitted the sidewalk project to the Community Development Block Grant program during the past two years, but it was rejected. He explained that the City utilized two sources for the funding: (1) the SANBAG curb -cut program and (2) the general Gas Tax Fund, which can be used for sidewalk installations. He asked what portion still needs to be completed. Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom, replied that the sidewalk needs to be finished in front of the Mail Mart on Mt. Vernon. City Manager Schwab, stated that the City does not have any plans to install a sidewalk in front of the Mail Mart but added that the City will investigate the matter. He indicated that the City has sufficient funds to pave that area. Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom, suggested that the City install a sidewalk on that section of the street. City Manager Schwab, explained that the City plans to repair curbs, gutters, and sidewalks that are lifted and cracked as part of the Site and Architectural Barrier project and asserted that he Council Minutes - 05/12/94 Page 5 Sunday, May 1, 1994. He added that the show was well attended. NEW BUSINESS 8A. Establish Priority Projects for 1996-2001 Regional 4 Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) CC-94-52 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CARLSTROM, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBERS SINGLEY AND BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to approve the revised priority recommendations for the 1996-2001 RTIP, with the number one priority being the Barton Road/I-215 bridge. 8B. Transfer Excess Community Development Block Grant Funds from Senior Center Expansion Projects (FY 1992-93 & FY 1993-94) into Park Playground Surfacing Project Fund CC-94-53 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CARLSTROM, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBERS SINGLEY AND BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to transfer $51,662.33 from the CDBG Senior Citizen Center Fund into an account to purchase new ADA accessible park playground surfacing at Terrace Hills Park. Mayor Matteson requested that staff update the City's population signs. 8C. Grand Terrace Participation in the Summer Youth Employment Training Program (SYETP) CC-94-54 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CARLSTROM, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (COUNCILMEMBERS SINGLEY AND BUCHANAN WERE ABSENT), to authorize participation in the San Bernardino County Summer Youth Employment Training Program (SYETP) for the summer of 1994 and to authorize the City Manager to execute all required agreements and affidavits. 8D. Schedule Budget Meetings Council concurred to hold the Budget hearings on May 31, 1994 and June 1, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. May 17, 1994 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL. ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: May 7A, 1994 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT rd-I'_AT. TRANCAARTATTAN WTTNn (T.Tir) , ARTT['_T.F. '3_ [-TTRA-g-n. REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM (Revised) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED _Y Grand Terrace apportionment of Article 3 county wide curb -cut funds to be used for handicap ramp projects is $14,395 through FY 94/95. Council passed Resolution No. 94-06, on May 12, 1994, as authorization for City reimbursement of $9,348.72 from SANBAG for expenditures relating to sidewalk handicap ramps installed at the driveway entrances of Terrace Hills Junior High School on Deberry Street. L_ Staff is requesting adoption of a new resolution for a change in the SANBAG reimbursement claim and to rescind Resolution No. 94-06. Change is necessary for an additional $1,500 to be claimed for installation of handicap ramps at the east corners of Britton Way and Mt. Vernon which was done subsequent to the initial claim request. Staff wishes to submit one claim and one resolution combining the entire $10,848.72 rather than submit a separate claim and separate resolution for the new amount to be claimed. Attached is a copy of the revised claim and new resolution to be submitted to SANBAG. Staff Recommends that Council: 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION 94-XX RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-06 AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LTF, ARTICLE 3 CURB -CUT CLAIM. 2. AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE LTF, ARTICLE 3 CLAIM FORM DOCUMENTS. COUNCIL AGMA ITEM # 3'E. SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TDA ARTICLE CURB -CUT CLAIM SB 821 (Article 3) r C ECKI OF 1`11 MS TO BE FI .ED 4 Claimant: City of Grand Terrace Date: MAY 17, 1994 The items checked below are enclosed in connection with the claim filed herein: x 1. Article 3 Claim Form See instructions for completing the form in the instruction package. x 2. Governing Body Audtozation Submit a copy of a resolution or minute order. See SCAG TDA Guide Section 1.4.2. _ N/A 3. Financial Reporting Form 4, See instructions for completing Schedule 8-A in the instruction package. ►.TFO=.VU SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CURB -CUT PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Claimant: City of Grand Terrace Date: MAY 17, 1994 County LTF: San Bernardino rr CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information on this Project Information From is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signed: (Name & title) 1. 4W 2. 3 4. PROJECT BUDGET AND ACTUAL EXPENDTrURF.S 22579 Project Name: TERRACE HILLS JR. HIGH SIDEWALK. DRIVEWAY BREAKS , DEBE R ST. , G. T. Project Expenditures: Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 821) $ 9,348.72 $ 9,348.72 TDA Article 8 $ $ Other $ $ Total Project Revenues $ $ Project Name: EAST CORNERS OF MT. VERNON AND BRITTON WAY, G.T.,-HANDICAP RAMPS Project Expenditures: Budget Actual TDA Article 3 (SB 821) $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 TDA Article 8 $ $ Other $ $ Total Project Revenues Project Name: Project Expenditures: TDA Article 3 (SB 821) TDA Article 8 Other Total Project Revenues Project Name: Project Expeaditur�es: TDA Article 3 (SB 821)_ TDA Article 8 Other Total Project Revenues Budget Actual Budget Actual $ $ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Planning Department City Council Community Services Department May 26, 1994 Authorization to go to bid for abatement of nuisance and health and safety hazards. A. 12581 Mirado Avenue B. - 11881 Preston Street C. 22872 Main Street Request approval for abatement through bids and City staff cleanup. Property maintenance, cleanup and dumping. **************************************** City staff has been involved with code enforcement on the following property sites for various repetitive violations within the past three months. All properties contain vacant single family homes, accessory structures and two properties contain contaminated pools. All properties are controlled by mortgage lending institutions. The City has received numerous complaints from surrounding property owners and community representatives. The quantity of vacant houses have been increasing in the City and the repetitive lack of consistent maintenance and security checks or proper securing has been noted. Last known legal representatives and property owners have been notified - of all code enforcement proceedings; 12581 Mirado Avenue (Rand Financial/G.E. Mortgage), 11881 Preston Street (Univest Home Loan and Wayne Deringer), and 22872 Main Street (Westcoe Company and Bronze Enterprises, Ltd.. and Aetna Financial Corporation) . COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 3 F 22795 Barton Road * Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 * (909) 824-6621 Respectfully submitted, Maria C. Muett Community Services/Code Enforcement Approved by, �'&� -14"-z' 6&- � Thomas Schwab, City Manager Attachments: A, B, C - w Photos of Project Sites D - Declarations of Nuisance MCM:ma 4 c:\wp51\pLvming\ce\ce9414.cc 3 i-~fit ( a�` t � T.� -.. i�4�-��— ,1 �_,�j,� �y.• , f r 1 t�iA '.ass} t . � �f•�r�r� .n,jn{� �'' �� ,1 a,� f� � �'^*'" ",.i�� .. � ' Y . cFv ,.a c r Try � • � �'a ��. C � ' A .'� � , f.l a - V+ %: u!' � �.�• l : N.f �K'>�ri'T}i. yh r. � � ,i NNW 'Alt • - �'. T %1 ' .r. ' • jam'. ,tY � y.L � ~i S �•.. dl fte jY.J�v :}A ��. J .yam y - � •Y. L . rYJ. . >1, �i..Y.• ~ _ iHlVft z_ L^.��i . \ . _ _ . N. — _ _ - r Ww, VM ,µ M i �. r � 8aa`� `Yi. 1:r• t"'131�J'i t '.� ' t �t�fT '�4-r.V�J,yn�� l �j n�)Y y�,� y„� `• ; y "°• 5 + �..� i a 3r '✓a- q t 9 b-, 9� 131 dy 1 '� f�,�. __ t,C_' s �T� v'f "�; d-:�J"� �`�.�. r'.z-.�5�� vYys'r.+ � � {��, Iss � •.�. _ _ �✓� � I � - ' . � -��' � �,��+�'i `ate r , �. l a 't 11 +; � J � `� `�' •+Y.. -70 •h 1 h"�. '��r .�. '�+. r ��`` �-. � .-. ter• � .i�'Y a.. "'� 13'� i�' 1 2. Removal of overgrown vegetation, debris and trash from property. Removal of vegetation, debris and trash from easement ditch along property line on south side. If the above actions are not completed by April 11,1994, the City of Grand Terrace shall eliminate the public nuisance by completing said action, and the cost of the abatement and fines will be assessed against the property, and will be attached as a lien (costs and fines) upon the property until paid in accordance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Fines are: Code Enforcement Fee: n 4V City Fines: City Abatement: First Notice - $ 50.00 Non -Compliance - $ 50.00 Debris Abatement - $ 50.00 $375.00 Gen Costs (Administrative Staff personnel, dumping and removal, filing) This determination may be appealed to the Grand Terrace City Council by submitting an application for appeal to the City Clerk's Department within ten days from the date of this Declaration. Maria C. Muett, Associate lanner - Code Enforcement Officer 4 MCM:ma cc: Thomas Schwab, City Manager c\wp51\p1anning\ce\ce9408.dec 2 Date " Dead, decayed, diseased, overgrown or hazardous trees, grass, weeds and vegetation, cultivated or uncultivated, which is likely to harbor rats or vermin, or constitute an unsightly appearance, or is detrimental to neighboring properties or property values." 4. Broken down perimeter fencing and side gates. If this condition exists it may be in violation of the Grand Terrace Nuisance Ordinance Chapter 8, Section (6) and (9). "Building exteriors, walls, fences, driveways, sidewalks and walkways which are maintained in such condition as to be come so defective, unsightly, or in such condition of deterioration or disrepair that the same causes depreciation of the values of surrounding property or is materially detrimental to nearby properties and improvements." The following actions are required to eliminate the public nuisance: 1. Securing the building, boarding all window and entry areas. 2. Removal of lumber, junk, debris, trash, rubble, broken asphalt from driveway on property. Removal of overgrown weeds, grass, trees, shrubs, succulents, and cacti. If the above actions are not completed by May 10,1994, the City of Grand Terrace shall eliminate the public nuisance by completing said action, -and the-mfof :the tweht and fines will be assessed against the property, and will be attached as a lien (cost and fines) upon the property until paid in accordance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Fines are: 4 Code Enforcement Fee: First Notice - $ 50.00 Non -Compliance - $ 50.00 Debris Abatement - $ 50.00 City Fines: $375.00 City Abatement: Uen Costs (Administrative Stab personnel, dumping and removal, filing) This determination may be appealed to the Grand Terrace City Council by submitting an application for appeal to the City Clerk's Department within ten days from the date of this Declaration. of Maria C. Muett, Associat Planner Code Enforcement Officer MCM:ma cc: Thomas Schwab, City Manager c\wp5l\0anning\m\ceXIIdce 2 --y Date If the above actions are not completed by June 2, 1994, the City of Grand Terrace shall eliminate the public nuisance by completing said action, and the cost of the abatement and fines will be assessed against the property, and will be attached as alien (cost and fines) upon the property until paid in accordance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Fines are: Code Enforcement Fee: First Notice - $ 50.00 Non -Compliance - $ 50.00 Debris Abatement - $ 50.00 City Fines: $375.00 per day City Abatement: Lien Costs (Administrative Staff personnel; demolition, dumping and removal; filing) Maria C. Muett Date Community Services/Code Enforcement Thomas Schwab Date — City Manager cc: John Harper, City Attorney c\WP51\PLANNING\C E\CE9414.DEC 2 RECEIVED n 19 • Crime Prevention CITY CLERK'S DEPT. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE MEETING, MONDAY, APRIL 11, 1994 The regular monthly meeting of the Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee was held at the Senior Center on Grand Terrace Road and was called to order at 1300 hours. MEMBERS PRESENT: JoAnn Johnson, Chairperson, Phil Spisak, Vice Chairperson, Harold Lord, Treasurer, Howard Panek, Be Gigandet and Dick Peters. Dick Rollins is recording secretary. MEMBERS ABSENT: None CITY STAFF: None GUESTS: None The Minutes of the meeting of March 14► 1994 were read and submitted for approval. It was noted that Be Gigandet's name had been had been inadvertantly omitted from the Minutes and should be added as having been in attendance. Ii�I I #1 There being no report from the Finance Dept. there was no Treasurer's Report. #2 There being no report from the Citizen Patrol Unit there was no discussion on the Citizen Patrol activities. #3 A great deal of discussion revolved around the purpose of this Committee, it's original basis as an informational group for the City Council and it's now relationship with the Community Services Department and how it is now to function with the Community Services Officer and it's relationship between the City of Grand Terrace and the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. All further discussion on the varied subject matter involving this Committee would await the prescence of the Community Services Officer. There being no further business matters to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 1915 hours. Respec llty i •ted, COUNCILACENDA ITEU Dic Rollins, Recording Secretary. rhv/ 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324.5295 • (909) 824-6621 • Fax (909) 783-7629 RECEIVED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE :t :90 f u� CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY CLERK'S OEPT. MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 18, 1994 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by chairman Gary Eldridge. 2. MWMzRS PRESENT: Gary Eldridge, Eileen Hodder, Cindy Williams, Vic Phennighausen, and Jim Hodder. The minutes of the December 21 meeting were read and approved. None. (a) Purchase requisitions for additional medical supplies have been submitted to city staff. (b) There was a discussion concerning the purchase of medical supplies.. It was generally agreed that the committee should have a priority list so that the appropriate amount and type of supplies would be well planned. It was also agreed that it would not be possible for the committee to equip the city with any more than a minimum number of supplies and that they should be only basic needs, leaving expensive and unique supplies and equipment -to, other agencies. (a) There was a discussion concerning the Northridge quake and that public awareness efforts may prove more fruitfull. now than under normal circumstances. All SPA COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # alC,o� GBNCY OPMATIONS CO1D�RT JM RECEIVED CITY OF GRAND TBMLUM E ,AY 1 3 ;SSA X=TIING MMMITES FOR APMM 19, 1994 CITY CLERK'S oLcpT, 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by chairman Gary Eldridge. Z. Gary Eldridge, Eileen Sodder, Vic Phennighausen Tom. Schuabr Gana McKean and Sim. Singly. The minutes of the March IS` meeting mere read,amended,, and will be approved at the April 19 meeting. 4 4. C ty Manager Tom sclttiathat staff is in. the process of looking for a replacement for R. Anstina, and the position is not going to be 61 ni nated. They are. hoping to fill it by Mute. Ton alsa reported that ha wants, to have a training exercize sa that more people gill be aware of respnsihlities in case of an emergency.. Jim' Singly- reported that the Canaty- ROC is in the middle of reorganizing. It is not yet clear how this may affect the work the committee is doing... via &Wported that bartterias have, been. ordered for the. camcorder. EaY MIXMS tsaiofng is being pMsed oat, hoMaver the CCF can. provide a three day- course on the Incident Command. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 9PA 40 C9 Im Planning Department TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 23, 1994 SUBJECT: TTM-88-02R2/E-94-05. Phased Tentative Tract Map 14078 (Phases 1 and 2) Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1 Riverside Highland Water. An application for Environmental Review and Tentative Map revisions for a 15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot _ in the R1-20 Zone District. TTM-14078-1 encompasses the reservoir lot only. APPLICANT: Barney Karger and Riverside Highland Water LOCATION: Pico Street/Blue Mountain Court (APN# 277-181-01) RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on Conditions of Approval. Resolution - Refer to Attachment 1. For purpose of clarity, Tentative Tract Map 14078 Phase 1 (Riverside Highland Water) is identified as Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1. Phase 2 (Barney Karger) refers to remaining portion Tentative Tract Map 14078, Lots 1-15 and Lot A (Landscaping and Assessment District). BACKGROUND The proposed project was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on May 5, 1994. Refer to resolution, associated Negative Declaration and Planning Commission staff report, Attachments 1 and 2. The subject property is located near the easterly terminus of Pico Street near its intersection with Blue Mountain Road The net area of the overall site (Phase 1 and Phase 2) is 9.2 acres. Net area for TTM-14078-1 is .8 acre and encompasses the Riverside Highland Water reservoir. COUNCBe AQMDA ff A # (o'(� 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (909) 824-6621 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TTM-88-02R2 (PHASED MAP) OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14078, LOT 1 OF PHASE 1 ON TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14078-1 AND ADOPTION OF ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4W WHEREAS, the applicants, Barney Karger and Riverside Highland Water, have applied for approval of a revised Tentative Tract Map 14078 (Phased Map - Lot 1 of Phase 1), dividing 9.2 acres into 15 homesites and one water reservoir tank site; and WHEREAS, this phased map allows Lot 1 of Phase 1(Riverside Highland Water) to proceed with the completion of their water reservoir site project; and WHEREAS, Phase 2 (15 residential lots/Barney Karger) of the tentative tract map previously approved on August a 1993, the conditions will remain the same and will be completed at a later date; and - 4br WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 14078 Phased Map (Phased 1 and 2) will result in two final maps; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM-88-02R2 (Tentative Tract Map 14078, Phases 1 and 2) Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1 and associated Negative Declaration to the City Council; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by City Council on May 26, 1994 regarding approval of Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1 and the associated Negative Declaration. Attachment 1 Riverside Highland Water will construct a six foot high solid decorative block wall in place of the chain link fence. 2. The reservoir tank shall not extend higher than six feet above the required six foot high block wall. At the time of entire water tank structure repainting by property owner of Lot 1, a color sample shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Maintenance of the tank and site shall be the responsibility of Lot 1 of Phase 1 owner, Riverside Highland Water. 3. Maintenance of the wall to be the responsibility of owner of Phase 1 (Riverside Highland Water Company). All graffiti removal from block wall in Phase 1 (Lot 1) shall be the responsibility of the Phase 1 - Lot 1 owner (Riverside Highland Water Company). 4. Compliance with the City Engineer's requirements in their memorandum dated April 12, 1994, attached as Attachment D. 5. Compliance with the Fire Warden's requirements in their memorandums dated April 15, 1993 and amended, as well as April 14, 1994, attached as Attachment E. 6. Compliance with the State of California Department of Water Resources requirements in their memorandums dated May 4, 1993 and April 7, 1994, attached as Attachment G. 7. Compliance with the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District requirements in their memorandum dated April 13, 1994, attached as Attachment H. 8. Pull appropriate demolition permits for demolishing and removal of all irrigation structures or facilities.` PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 26th day of May, 1994. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof Planning Department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 5, 1994 SUBJECT: TTM-88-02R2/E-94-05. Phased Tentative Tract Map 14078 (Phases 1 and 2) Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1 (Riverside Highland Water). An application for environmental review and tentative map revisions for phasing of a 15 lot subdivision and one reservoir lot in the R1-20 Zone District. TTM-14078-1 encompasses the reservoir lot only. APPLICANT: Barney Karger and Riverside Highland Water 6 LOCATION: Pico Street, Blue Mountain Court (APN# 277-181-01) RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on Conditions of Approval Resolution refer to Attachment A. **************************************************** For the purpose of clarity, Tentative Tract Map 14078 Phase 1(Riverside Highland Water) is identified as Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1. Phase 2 (Barney Karger) refers to remaining portion Tentative Tract Map 14078, Lots 1-15 and Lot A (Landscaping and Assessment District). The proposed phased Tentative Tract Map 14078 (Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1 and Phase 2) will require the issuance of a Negative Declaration, refer to Attachment B. 1 Attachment 2 22795 Barton Road * Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (909) 824.6621 Refer to Attachment [,I City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 12, 1994 (REVISED). Topics of discussion included easement to Lot 1 of Tract 14078-1, dual road access and rear side access of Lots 7, 8 and 15 of Tract Map 14078 (it should be noted that when the CC&Rs for Phase 2 are submitted to the Community Development Director, inclusion of dual access road and easement should be done), storm water and reservoir drain water drainage system plan and agreement between both applicants, run-off within and off site, grading and slope maintenance, landscaping installation and maintenance. The City tar Engineer and applicants have agreed upon the respective proposed conditions of approval. All conditions of approval for both phases are to be completed prior to finalization of respective maps. For simplification, the Planning Department has separated the respective conditions of approval for the maps. Mr. Karger's conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 14078 and Riverside Highland Water's conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 14078-1 are listed separately. Tentative Tract Map 14078 conditions of approval have not been altered and will remain the same. Refer to Attachment C. 1. City Engineer's requirements as noted in the April 12, 1994 (REVISED) f1W memorandum, Attachment D. 2. Fire Warden's requirements as noted in the memorandums to the City dated April 15, 1993 and amended, and April 14, 1994, Attachment E. 3. Riverside Highland Water Company's comments dated May 5, 1993 and general comments of April 5, 1994, Attachment F. 4. State of California, Department of Water Resources requirements, dated May 4, 1993, Attachment G. 5. Compliance with the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District, dated April 13, 1994, Attachment H. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval for phasing Tentative Tract Map 14078 (Phases 1 & 2) Lot 1 of Phase 1 or Tract 14078-1, by adoption of resolution (Attachment A) and associated Negative Declaration (Attachment B) subject to the following conditions of approval. 3 Respectfully Submitted, Maria C. Muett, Associate Planner Approved by, Joann Lombardo, Interim Community Development Director JL:MCM:ma Attachments: A - Resolution B - Negative Declaration C - Conditions of Approval - TTM 14078/Phase 2 D - City Engineer's Comments E - Fire Warden's Comments F - Riverside Highland Water Comments G - State of California, DWR Comments H - Riverside Corona Conservation Comments Exhibits: I A - Revised Map (Phases 1 and 2) c\wp51\phmning\maps\-Pc 5 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Environmental Review - An environmental review of TTM-88-02R2 (Phased Map Lot 1 of Phase 1 or 14078-1) has been conducted and noticed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; that based upon review, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace finds that the proposed subdivision will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Section 2. Findings - This City Council does hereby make the following findings relative to the approval of TTM-88-02R2: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration. 4 5. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Negative Declaration is hereby adopted and that TTM-88-02R2 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall construct a six foot high, solid decorative block wall around the perimeter of Lot 1 and the west side of the easement. Additionally, avocado trees shall be planted around the outside perimeter of the wall. Spacing, size and specific variety of trees shall be with the approval of the Community Development Director. Maintenance of the trees, erosion and weed control on slopes adjacent to the block wall for lots 9,10,12,13 & 14 shall be the responsibilityof Riverside Highland Water until the lots are fully developed and sold. These items will then be maintained by the respective property owners. In Phase I, the applicant shall be allowed to construct a chain link fence on the east side of the reservoir site and to the west of the access road easement at the easterly boundaries of Tentative Tract Map 14078, instead of a block wall, until development to the east occurs. Location of the chain link fence shall be correctly shown on the Final Map. At that time, L Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of May, 1994, by the following vote: M NOES: $r ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper City Attorney CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY L Background 1. Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road. Grand Terrace. CA 92324-5295 Attention: Patrizia Materassi. Planning Director. 714-824-6621 3. Date of Environmental Assessment: 4. Agency Requiring Assessment: City of Grand Terrace TTM-88-02R2 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: TRACT 14078-1 6. Location of Proposal: PICO STREET/BLUE MOUNTAIN COURT 4r 277-181-01 II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Ma a No 1. Earth. Will proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of this soil? C. Substantial change in topography X or ground surface relief features? 1 Yes Mgybe b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface N runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or flow N rate of of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? 3 FJ No M M _r, Yes Maybe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate X of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? r 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an - V emergency evacuation plan? /1 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population X of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for housing? additional .� 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? . 5 Yes Maybe No a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? L Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard health)? (excluding mental b. Exposure of people to potential %< hazards? ,r 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? 7 Yes Ma e No more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects 4 on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will -be prepared. I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the 4r mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL 1 MFACT REPORT is required. Joann Lombardo Interim Community Development Director 'Op- re-1 C>,) I 4,A4 Date Signature For City of Grand Terrace 9 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Maybe. This project phases a previous map. Phase 2 of this map subdivides tracts that may create a demand for residential housing consistent with the City's General Plan. ,13a. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Maybe. The project will eventually become a residential development, thus creating increased vehicular movement to the existing traffic circulation pattern. The Tentative Tract Map will make available 15 residences.. The CMP thresholds for TIAs are 250 dwelling units. The project will not generate enough vehicle trips to require a TIA nor exceed any of the Grand Terrace residential thresholds of 100 dwelling units. However, this project will be conditioned to pay a traffic mitigation fee per trip added to the traffic system. 16e. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the storm water drainage? Maybe. In terms of storm water drainage. Pavement of property may increase 4r volumes of storm water run-ofE Yet, proposed retention basins may hold oil sediments and slow down speed of water. As mitigation measure, the project is conditioned to provide adequate drainage facilities to accept drainage from Blue Mountain and properties to the East. Mitigation measure may include requirement for drainage study. 21c. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Maybe. As previously approved, buildout of this map may cumulatively add to Barton Road volume and affect service levels of major city intersections. Therefore, a mitigation measure of the previous map conditioned this project to pay traffic improvement fee wherever it is installed proportionately to the amount of trips it generates. This condition is carried over into this phased map. Maybe. In terms of storm water drainage, pavement of property may increase volumes of storm water run-off Yet, proposed retention basins may hold oil sediments and slow down speed of water. As mitigation measure, the project was previously conditioned to provide adequate drainage facilities to accept drainage from Blue Mountain and properties to the East. This condition is carried over into this phased map. PF . Recommendation by the State of California Department of Agriculture in their letter dated April 16, 1993, attached as Attachment G. 10. Compliance with the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District for the Erosion Control Plan. 11. Payment of Traffic Mitigation Fee wherever the fee is installed in proportion to amount of trips generated by the development. 12. In accordance with Subregional TCM Implementation Program, wherever adopted and installed by the City, the applicant (property owner) shall have one of the following applicable measures installed, such as on -site pedestrian walkways and bicycle facilities to connect each building in the development to public streets (i.e. Mt. Vernon Avenue/Barton Road bicycle lane), or contribute to a shuttle that accesses transit facilities, or contribute to the development -of a telecommunication center, or contribute to transit improvements. 15. This Tentative Tract Map supersedes any previous map applications for this phase of the property, both parcel and tentative tract maps. 16. Pull appropriate demolition permits for demolishing and removal of all irrigation - structures or facilities. - 17. Plans shall be amended to clearly distinguish front and rear yard setbacks for Lots 4W1,2,3,9 and 10, clarification of lot accesses and clearly define easement locations across respective lots. c:\wp51\pknning\maps\WMMapre Joann Lombardo April 12, 1994 Page 2 6. Any facilities that shall be considered permanent and possibly as part of future development shall be designed at this time in the manner that will fit the ultimate improvements. 7. Grading and slope maintenance agreement, as may be required, shall be provided to the City. This agreement shall address the issues of grading within Phase 2 of Tract 14078 and maintenance of landscaping of the graded slopes as said landscaping is approved by the Planning Department. 8. Grading plan shall be submitted for review by City staff; and shall include the following: (a) Grading around Tract 14078-1 Lot 1. (b) Grading, paving, retaining walls and freestanding walls on and around the reservoir site. - - (c) Access roadways to Tract 14078-1 and typical storm drain section along the east side of Tentative Tract 14078, and any grading to be done on the remaining parcel of Tract 14078. (d) All facilities conveying the water to the detention basin. 9. The existing retention basin shall be evaluated for. (a) Capacity. (b) Structural stability under the most severe conditions of discharge and detention. 10. Pay all applicable capital improvement fund fees: (a) Storm drain. (b) Street. All improvements shall be designed by Ownees civil engineer, to the specifications of the City. JK/ct • u ••�� uur. jovernmcnt 4-cmer No. Arrowhcbd Avenue. F1r6l FIoor - S. nardlro. CA 9241S-0166 f) 36742:2. 387-4213 �,�, G'7 iCL OF PUP-LIC SAFt?TY DICK WIC UA;•1S. Dicectc: GRAND TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF �•,�circ.7C SERVICES `ate: tS, To: -i Fire Department eference Number:-'';"�'� gg - � (i3-0 j App1 .Location: FO;.LOWINO FIRE - UEP ,, . , ArMMT CONDITIONS SHALL 9E COZOL_, , r PRIOR Tp RECOfi r._ _ ON OF THE FINAL MR Site _aspectior. final is required to verify C 1 have peen met. ordit' .: .:` _ ., : a� Private ,oad ria_::tenance - and snow T„ •-_ - ' JC' SLI,�1^i a �e:.. `v 1, t S a 1 be -rcvlded. :yritt-.^. fire +aocess ,.te _ - 1..: i�z a depar �,.:ent having Isd__ ` ` Loads sh;+_ provide an aIi weather s "face wi- paving wid h of -Wenty (20) feet. ''� t.. L -WVopment -.�� t 5^r r i R water systems desialned to meet the rec,.i: -w lov_shal_ be approved by fire «cri _ jurisdictic-. w -she _.re depa=tme.^.=_s copies c; =~e w The ct_ve_oper shall *=arnlsn the f _e depa_, ,en = _ _W h ate: :ste.:. ir.:prove:ne :t p�a^ r::r _ w_ c. s^a?_ he cue=a- o - _ - pp:;,vim_. ;:=`o_ s•,.. ^s _ and aoo=^ved L-v --.e =-= = =e=a=--e^-- -_dial-� _..�Z`_ •�-_•.. .^..�.�..��r. ..... T: � _ - �_ _ _ __ _ - "• __ •'tea—...• _ � .. CO'1n'' ��Gl:l�:9 - r -_ _ =prlate-� al cum==ions, usJL C. �a^.� San �y '� o the Determ4na-ion of ^ir = it: . have min � rrua eight. (8) inch mains, six � o e i nc:� •r seater sys Hers ='ral _ _�C:• _5 I�G Q �_• Tested Page Two Fire Dept Ref. No. R F-2A- In areas without water serving :1:AA11 i protection water system shall be based on NFPA 123 prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a with gravity flow or an approved NFPA 13, 13Re - or. 13D system. See attached private water supply requirements. M fire sprinkler R F F-2B. NS-IL3 MROUGR iL5. Water systems•desi ned to required fire flow shall be operational and ..a 9 meet the department Rrior to framing construction occurring. The requ red fbthe ire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations using the San Bernardino County "Guide For the Determination of Recmired Fire Flow In areas without water serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow or an approved NFPA 13, 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler system. ME FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED PRIOR TO BUILMIG PERMITS 3EING ISSUED: 4* IP 3• -The San Bernardino county )epartm provides f ire protection for the :o any construction occurring on any parcel, .he fire department fo- 'verification of evelop,'nenL reruireme ;is. All new cons=rui xist_ng -I --:'a Ccde rcau:..m reentc a- cdes, ordinances,~ cr standards of the - -� Forestry and Fire Warden City of Grand Terrace. Prior the applicant shall cantact current fire rrotecticn :tior_ sha=1 comet _-=a=-- st__U-.�es depa. -men* . P F4• This development shall com sy wi:.1, _ire ondit .ors as adopted b - - OCdt `.. ^� p " .v Coun%v, Development :^.:.�. '^Zi_ devel�w7n-- Aa ed _ _ e eview ,-Led .�._.... F Pc ic)n ..cc-,.-..; _ sl: = «^ Vad ._cm each .^.0 � +,;�:'� s�%� -, :,i ::�;�•�'„^.,-: ^a -=•_s:^.ed : __ _..t_ epammabi- URF A DRIVEWAY FIRE _- WJMER-HEAD TURN -AROUND sole: t" : 20' I i f C� �`<TEr: �_o!ATE TURN-A.Rouvo s(.ttc : -t = 2;D' DESIGN , A PPA RATU: T'.laIlgc, ra K..�.i1 K..J�MIi�'l . .- f .. :•:-t . `� uR� i i of _ _ _ • ' 2tYAic sr, tCUL-of-SAC; =--t M-2- Fire Dept. Ref. No. 'j� m s&-OaQ ( NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS: f` Questions and comments may be directed to: ire Protection Planning County Goverment Center, First Floor 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92415-0186. Phone (909) 387-4213. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, DAVID j. D ISCO== C--== County = Warc=-- bY- / . leeErnyani<<, :=;n ir: to�Fc_--_ ==Ce=_n= forms/GT`oin Dame ?d otint QO_ APPROVE ✓ r •\ a V 1 1 1 V 1 w•'� STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION OF LAND AND RIGHT OF WAY 1416 NINTH STREET,. ROOM 431 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FAX: (916) 654-0738 FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION PROM: ' v TO: OFt OFt✓IICl/J'i�� PHONE: (916) C?qo FAX ` ,09) /O 3 - 74d FAX; (916) 654-0738 TOTAL NO. PAGES: IF TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES ARE NOT RICZ ED, PLEASE CALL (916) 653-6519 OR (916) 653-7602. ow COMMENTS; Ile Attachment G n 11 Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District 1299 COLUMBIA AVE., SUITE E-5 a RIVERSIDE. CA 92507 • (909) 883-7891 . FAX (009) 683-3814 Ap:i113. 1994 Joann Lombardo Interim Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Greed Terrace, CA 92324 RE: File #7 M-88-02R2, E-94-05 Dear Ms. Lombardo: M�@Hw�m APR 1 9 1994 Riverside Higbiand Water Co. The Riverside -Corona Resource conservation District would like to offer the following suggestions on Tract Map No. 14078, Pico Street/Blue Mountain Court. 1. An erosion control plan should be developed before construction begins on Phases I and H. 2. The plan should cover the entire time the project is under construction_ It should state which erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be used, where they will be located, and when they will be installed 3. The BMPs should contain both structural and vegetative means for erosion control. 4. The plan should state that each practice will be completed and inspected before the next phase of construction begins. 5. Native plant materials should be encouraged wherever possible. Sincerely, ,Stiuw �r SHELLI LAMB District Manager R—MGd Paps H- Planning Department ' TO: City Council 4W FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 23, 1994 SUBJECT: SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be incorporated in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The merger of the one vacant lot with the existing church facility site into one parcel is reviewed through the Lot Line Adjustment process. APPLICANT: Azure Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church Project Representatives - Dr. Jack Booker and Jerry Cole LOCATION: 22633' Barton Road (Education Center to. be located on Center City Court RECOMMENDATION: Approval based on conditions of approval. Ordinance (Attachment 1). ********************************** BACKGROUND In March of 1993, the applicant received approval to construct an elementary school building associated with the existing church. Since that time, the applicant has scaled down its plans for a school facility and has pursued an opportunity to purchase the adjacent property owned by Zampese/DeBenedet Partnership. Consequently, the applicant has submitted a new application for expansion of existing site and a smaller educational center. 1 WUNMAQWA MU # (off 22795 Barton Road * Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 * (909) 824-6621 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SP-94-01, SA-94-03, L1,94-02 AND E-94-06, ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, TO ACCOMMODATE AN EDUCATIONAL CENTER WITHIN AN EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL SITE WHEREAS, the applicant (Southeastern California Association of Seventh Day Adventists - Azure Hills Church) has applied for approval of a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting approval of SP-94-01 (Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment) to change the zoning of Lot 2 from Village Commercial Subarea to Administrative Professional Subarea to, , blend with the zoning of the existing site (Attachment F); r and WHEREAS, the applicant is in the-esccrawu process. with the owner of the adjacent property to the southwest, Zampese/De Benedet Partnership (Attachment F); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. recommends approval of SP-94-01 and Negative Declaration (E-94-06) and approves associated cases (Site and Architectural SA 94-03 and Lot Line Adjustment LL-94-02). WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment for the merger of the two lots into one; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on May 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 5, 1994 recommended to the City Council that SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02 be approved and adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on May 26,1994 for SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED bpthe City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that SP-94-01 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review Board on May 5,1994. Minor changes and/or clarification may Attachment 1 10. Any new signage for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department or Planning Commission for review and approval. 11. All recommendations listed in the City Engineer's memorandum to the City (Attachment G). 12. All recommendations listed in the Fire Warden's Office memorandum to the City (Attachment H). 13. All recommendations verbally communicated by Riverside Highland Water Department to the City. These verbal communications reiterated the Fire Warden's memorandum to the City. 14. The Seventh Day Adventist Schools and Church shall strictly comply with the Grand Terrace Municipal Noise Ordinance especially with respect to the removal of existing facilities and construction of the new school building. 15. ' All aspects of the proposed project including building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace. 16. School to submit solid waste plans related to any near future recycling efforts to the Planning Department at time of building permit for information purposes and for the record. 17. In case the hours of operation and activities vary significantly from what is stated in the summary report, the applicant shall come back to staff for further analysis regarding traffic, parking and noise. 18. During construction phase, chain link fencing shall be constructed around the job site to prevent exposure of hazards to students and public. 19. Lot Line Adjustment application shall be submitted to the City Planning Department by May 26, 1994, 1st reading of the project ordinance by City Council. 20. The finalization of the Lot Line Adjustment shall be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 21. Submittal of Fire approved sprinkler plans to the City Planning Department for building permits. 22. Address for the educational center will be on Center City Court, for fire protection. 23. Recommendation that the church and school facilities respond to property owners previous complaints and agreed solutions: I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 9th day of June, 1994 by the following vote: 40 AYES: 11 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: John Harper City Attorney Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Planning Department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 5, 1994 SUBJECT: SP-94-01, SA 94-03, E-94-06 and LL -94-02 Educational Center within an existing church and school site. APPLICANT: Southeastern. Conference Association of 7th Day Adventist (Azure Hills) LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road (Education Center to be located -on Center. City Court) RECONEWEENDATION: Approval based on conditions of approval. Ordinance (Attachment A). *s*****s**ss******s*****s**s*s****s**s*s In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff completed an Initial Environmental Study and has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for this project. Refer to Attachment B. The site plan reflects the site area at 9.27 acres (refer to Exhibit A). The complete project site consists of two parcels owned , by two separate property owners (Azure Hills and Zampese/De Benedet Partnership). For simplification, the existing site is identified as Parcel 1 and the new parcel as Parcel2. Parcel 1 contains the existing church, associated school care buildings, tennis courts, playgrounds, maintenance buildings and parking. It is Attachment 2 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (909) 824-6621 DISCUSSION: Staff has worked with the applicant in addressing and resolving issues involved with this project. Many similar issues from the previous project, in addition to new ones are listed as follows and some are discussed in detail in the ISSUE SECTION. Barton Road Specific Plan and Landuse Amendment, Lot Line Adjustment, noise mitigations, wall treatment, fire and water requirements, parking on -site and public street parking, traffic impact fees, handicapped accessibility, r drainage patterns, elevation treatments, signage identification, address, harmonious blending of colors and materials for all structures on site, temporary use of relocatable classrooms, lighting, landscaping and irrigation. PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project (located on Parcel 2) is a one-story educational school building which contains 8,136 sq. ft. The floor plan indicates four 35' X 30' classrooms, four storage rooms adjacent of each individual _classroom, _ one -teacher's oT= area, janitor- -supply -area, -- - -- - - - - mechanical equipment area and corridor that runs east to west in the center of the educational center. - - Site PI • The site and elevation plans indicate the front entrance at the northeast side of Parcel 2. The parking for the educational center is located on the north side of Parcel 2 and west side of Parcel 1. The playground and ,lunch area are located directly adjacent to residential properties (three lots) on the southwest side, and the educational center has a 25 to 45 foot setback from the property line. All setbacks are in conformance with the Barton Road Specific Plan Regulations. The City staff preferred the front entrance to facing Center City Court, however, due to concerns expressed by the Fire Department of traffic congestion and emergency vehicles from the Fire Department next door, the placement was determined as noted on the site plan. This item is discussed in the ISSUE SECTION. The site plan does not reflect the existing portable classrooms on Parcel 1. These were allowed through the CUP process and have been extended in accordance with the GTMC. The project has been conditioned that upon construction startup or expiration of the Administrative Site and Architectural approval for the portable classrooms whichever comes first, the portable classrooms shall be removed from the site. Architectural Element The applicant is proposing to use the same materials as the original project; brown roof tile, brown wood trim and fascia and off white vinyl siding and beige brown masonry walls. At that time, staff was worldng with the applicant pursuant to the conditions of approval on the project attempting to bring more red hues into the new structure, thus blending with the main church sanctuary. Staff has conditioned the project that the colors, materials and design blend with the main church structure. #,�r Landscaping and Irrigation The applicant has not submitted a conceptual landscaping play The project has been conditioned for submittal of a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan indicating location, sizes, quantity, color, type of shrubs, trees, ground covering and lawn. The project originally included improvements in accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan and Barton Road Beautification Program. The same requirement would still remain other than the portion facing the Center City Court would not require Barton Road Beautification trees (liquid amber or magnolias), selection from the City approved street tree list is applicable. The lighting standards proposed by the applicant are the same as in the origin]. project. The lighting is for the parking lot and new site, with lighting standards at 20' feet. Staff far recommended 15' feet to avoid reflection onto adjacent residential properties. The previous condition would still remain prior to issuance of building permits if 20' foot lighting standards are desire a minor deviation is applicable to deviate from the Code requirement of 18' feet. Also, submittal of final detailed lighting plans to the City during building permit phase. The applicant proposes. using soffit lighting that would prevent overflow onto adjacent properties. Refer to Attachment E. rmy�Lxy 1. The merger of these two different zoned districts and respective landuses require a Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Landuse Map Revision. Additionally, the two parcel merger into one requires a Lot Line Adjustment. From a planning perspective, to make this a cleaner and smoother transition the Specific Plan Zoning and Landuse Amendment will change parcel 2 from the Village Commercial Subarea, which does not allow schools, to Office Professional Subarea, which does allow private schools associated with a Church and located on the same site. Refer to Attachment F. 5 yard along the west and east sides of the educational center to protect the children. In accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan, commercial development on properties adjoining any residential zone needs to incorporate specific standards; a five foot wide fully landscaped area along the residential zoned area, a minimum six foot wall placed on or just inside the property line, evergreen trees with minimum size of 15 galls shall be planted at least 20 feet on center, depending on species or clustered in equal amounts to screen parking or architecture. The Barton Road Specific Plan does not require a block wall between commercial and office zoned districts, only between residential properties. Therefore, staff only recommended a chain link fence along the west property line. 3. The elevations and placement of the structure is located on the site (Parcel 2) at an angle, thus front elevation does not face the street. The City understood the limited alternatives for the structure placement due to the unusual lot configuration, however, the City preferred having the front -elevation face Center City Court. The applicant, in situating the structure in this position, provides proper traffic and fire circulation. The Fire Department preferred- not having children roaming and cars congesting the public road and blocking emergency vehicles to and from the Fire Department. City staff proposes red curbing the curb improvements once they are completed in front of Parcel 2 to prevent blocldng and #40 creating hazardous situations to traffic and pedestrians. The City staff has also requested monument signage facing Center City Court, identifying the Seventh Day Adventist Azure Hills Educational Center. A conceptual plan is before the Planning Commission. City staff has been working with the applicant in preparing thvsignage in accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan. The project is conditioned to include submittal of detailed sign construction plans and fees to the City Planning Department for review and approval. 4. Parldng for the center and parldng in the street for the church activities was a concern to the City and surrounding residents. Upon request by the City, the applicant has submitted a letter to the City dated April 8,1994 which addresses the parking and traffic circulation for the Educational Center and church site. Due to the increased parking spaces, education of the church members to use the additional parking thus moving vehicles off Palm Street and according to applicant also encouraging parents dropping off the students to exit out Palm Avenue and Center City Court as mitigation measures is satisfactory to City staff. 7 Riverside Highland Water Riverside Highland Water Department's written comments were not available at the time of this report. However, the representative, Gene McMeans, is in contact with the Fire Warden's Department for confirmation of the fire flow tests. According to Mr. McMeans, if the hydrant tested was the one located on Center City Court and the fire flow was insufficient, then the water main from Mt. Vernon Avenue would have to be upsized ,possibly to an 8" main line. Written clarification from this agency will be available at the Planning Commission Meeting. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Department recommends approval of attached ordinance and associated Negative Declaration (SP-94-01, SA 94-03, E-94-06, LL-94-02) subject to the conditions of approval: PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SP-94-01, SA 94-03, LL-MAL E-9"6 _ AZURE HILLS EDUCATIQNAL CENTER 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review Board on May 5, 1994, attached as Exhibit A, minor changes and/or clarification may be made by the Planning Department. The design, materials and color shall match the existing main church building and associated school buildings with prior approval from the Planning Department. 2. The applicant shall pull appropriate building permits, Oversized/Heavy Load permits for removing portable classrooms and demolition permits. The portable classrooms will be removed at time of issuance of occupancy permits for the new school building or prior to the deadline for the Administrative Site and Architectural Review on the portable classrooms whichever comes first. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall apply for a Variance of up to 2 feet for 20 foot lighting standards in the Barton Road Specific Plan, Administrative Professional Subarea if the lighting standards exceed 18 feet. Lighting standards of 15 feet are recommended. 4. In accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan, the use of textures, colors and materials on the building shall be consistent with that of the other existing buildings to avoid dissimilar massing and proportions. 5. The applicant shall submit a detailed fencing plan indicating existing and proposed fencing. Submit a block wall profile to indicate 8' slumpstone wall as approved by 0 15. All aspects of the proposed project including building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace. 16. School to submit solid waste plans related to any near future recycling efforts to the Planning Department at time of building permit for information purposes and for the record. 6 17. Enrollment to be limited to a maximum of 200 (update needed) students. 18. In case the hours of operation and activities vary significantly from what is stated in the summary report, the applicant shall come back to staff for further analysis regarding traffic, parking and noise. 19. If hours of operation or activities are altered, further review may be needed to review traffic, parking and noise impacts. 20. During construction phase, chain link fencing shall be constructed around the job site to prevent exposure of hazards to students and public. 21. Lot Line Adjustment application shall be submitted to the City Planning Department by May 26, 1994, 1st reading of the project ordinance by City Council. 22. The finalization of the Lot Line Adjustment shall be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 23. Submittal of Fire approved sprinkler plans to the City Planning Department for building permits. 24. Address for the educational center will be on Center City Court, for fire protection. 25. Recommendation that the church and school facilities respond to property owners previous complaints and agreed solutions: a. Installation of shields on the tennis court or parking lighting or similar mitigation. b. Maintain open channel of communication with surrounding property owners and acknowledgment of installation of block wall during building permit phase. 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP-94-01 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION, E-94-06, TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE; AND APPROVING ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS SA-94-03 AND LL-94-02 WHEREAS, the applicant (Southeastern California Association of Seventh Day Adventists - Azure Hills Church) has applied for approval of a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for approval of environmental review and associated Negative Declaration for associated cases, SP-94-01, SA-94-03 and LL-94-02 (Attachment B); and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting approval of SP-94-01(Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment) `to change the zoning of Lot 2 from Village Commercial Subarea to Administrative Professional Subarea to blend with the zoning of the - existing - site- - - -- - (Attachment F); and = __ - - _ -- -- _ WHEREAS, the applicant is in the escrow process with the owner of the adjacent property to the southwest, Zampese/De Benedet Partnership (Attachment F); and r WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment for the merger of the two lots into one; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on May 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. recommends approval of SP-94-01 and Negative Declaration (E-94-06) to the City Council; and approves associated cases (Site and Architectural SA 94-03 and Lot Line Adjustment LIP94-02); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 5, 1994 approved Resolution No. recommending approval to the City Council of SP-94-01 and E- 94-06, and approving SA-94-03 and LL-94-01 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, that the following findings have been made: L That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development- 0 school yard play area on the south side, which shall be 8' high. The exact location shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Prior to building permit, applicant shall submit a response plan to show mitigation measures to be implemented in case of noise -related complaints. Examples of measures are double - glazing and relocation of playground/lunch area associated with educational building. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, detailed lighting plans shall indicated location, size and quantity of lighting standards. 7. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted showing conformance with Barton Road Landscape Plan and site landscaping improvements indicating types, quantities, gallons and colors especially in buffered landscaped areas adjacent to residential properties. Advise landscaper not to work on the weekends and maintain compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 8. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall pay appropriate traffic impact fees to the City. Bus service is suggested to help alleviate traffic on Barton Road in the future.. 9. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be located at a distance from the edge of the building sa as not to be visibietrom=the destrian=level vrfrom adjace roadura3rs�-- ---- ----- 10. Any new signage for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department or Planning Commission for review and approval. 11. All recommendations listed in the City Engineer's memorandum to the City (Attachment G). 12. All recommendations listed in the Fire Warden's Office memorandum to the City (Attachment H). 13. All recommendations verbally communicated by Riverside Highland Water Department to the City. These verbal communications reiterated the Fire Warden's memorandum to the City. 14. The Seventh Day Adventist Schools and Church shall strictly comply with the Grand Terrace Municipal Noise Ordinance especially with respect to the removal of existing facilities and construction of the new school building. 15. All aspects of the proposed project including building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planing Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace. 16. School to submit solid waste plans related to any near future recycling efforts to the Planning Department at time of building permit for information purposes and for the record. n PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of May, 1994. AYES: 6 - Chairman Sims, Vice -Chairman Wilson, Commissioners Garcia, Huss, Munson and Van Gelder NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 - Commissioner Addington Iry :Ri 1P Brenda Stanfill City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper City Attorney Jim Sims, Chairman Planning Commission - r GIT Planning inn TERR c Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. to DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL -94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be incorporated in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The merger of the one vacant lot with the existing church facility site into one parcel is reviewed through the Lot. Lane Adjustment process. APPLICANT: #r Azure Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church Project Representatives - Jack Booker and Jerry Cole LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Joann Lombardo Date Interim Community Development Director city of Grand Terrace a\wp51\&mn4\sp`spWLnd 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 • (909) 824.6621 Yes Maybe No d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique X geologic or physical features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? 5 f. 040 Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the bay, inlet lake? N ocean or any or g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, -or - similar hazards? ........... -------_:.;. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: 4 a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The Creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ,V, —A- 2 Yes MUbe No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife -habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal light produce substantial new or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or N planned land use of an area? 4 Yes Maybe No d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or (/ pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ N b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? . x e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? £ Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources .of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result -in s a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 0 Yes Maybe No b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially_ reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below r self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ C. Does the project have, impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A projecfs impact on two or 8 R, Y\ III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Azure Hills Elementary School AIA/Southeastern Conference Association of 7th Day Adventist (Azure Hills Church) SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be incorporated in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The merger of the one vacant lot with the existing church facility- site .into one parcel is -reviewed through the. I bt_ Line Adjustment process. PROJECT LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road Grand Terrace 1.a,b Earth. Will proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions, disruptions, displacements, compactions of soil, change in topography or destruction to physical features? Yes, the construction and placement of the elementary school, parldng lot, picnic areas and playgrounds will result in changes to the soil and physical features, However, this is mitigated through the Planning and Building review process by the City Engineer's requirement for a formal grading plan, preliminary soils report for the proposed construction area, and proof of adequate drainage facilities as part of the conditions of approval for the project prior to occupancy. 1. c, d, e, f and g Earth. Will proposal result in: 4.b,c,d 5.a,b,c 6.a,b No, the proposal will not result in reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation or barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of animal species or reduction of numbers or rare/endangered species or deterioration to wildlife habitat? No, the site does not contain any animal species. Noise. Will the proposal result in: Increases in Busting noise levels or expose people to -severe noiwlevels? - Maybe, the proposed project will add some increase in noise levels or expose people to moderate noise levels while the children are playing outside during 4r recesses or during lunch breaks. Staff has determined that the dba levels that may exist from the current proposal to the completion of maximum student enrollment will not have a significant effect as the noise exposure can be mitigated by barriers conditioned for this project such as a 6-8 foot high wall near the open areas next to the property lines of the residential areas. equipment to be in conformance with the General Plan The project has been conditioned that the applicant must meet the maximum 55 dba noise level adjacent to residential properties. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? No, the proposal will produce new lighting however it will not be substantial or significant as the parking lot lighting to consist of energy efficient high pressure sodium fixtures 20" poles and directed away from residential properties. Building lighting will utilize soffit lighting at all entrances and glazed areas for security. All exterior lighting shall be controlled by time clocks and photo cells. The landscaping and irrigation will utilize drought tolerant plants and drip irrigation for shrubs and trees. All exterior lighting shall be directed away from residential properties as conditioned for this projecL 13.a,b,d 13.c,e,f Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Maybe, there will be no substantial vehicular traffic generated by the proposed project as it will only moderately increase business activity to the site, which is below City threshold for traffic studies. However, project is subject to pay for a traffic impact fee as it is developed. This will not trigger a TIA report nor separate traffic study in accordance with the Congestion Management Plan adopted by the City. Additionally, parking of the existing church facility has been noted by the community to spill over into adjacent on -street and commercial parking facilities during the Saturday service. As part of this project, the applicant is providing additional parking which will alleviate Saturday spill over problems. Transportation/Circulation. -Will the jirop4sarresu1t-'1n ° ° --- - - - - - - - --- -- - Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to 41V waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? No, there will be no substantial impact upon existing transportation systems or alterations to air, rail or waterborne traffic. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have a substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Firer Protection? No, since the Fire Department would be the first response team to a potential hazard at the existing building, it is not anticipated that increase of fire protection services would result from the proposed project. Emergency fire access will be provided to the site as part of this project. Police Protection? No, the proposed project will have no effect upon or result in the need for new or altered police protection services as the type of project proposed does not require it. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of people to potential hazards? No, the project does not require any collection of significant hazardous waste or exposure of people to potential hazards as it is a school facility and does not require any handling of such materials. ` 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? No, there will be no obstruction of any scenic_ view open to the public, however, there may be the creation of view of additional building structure from the surrounding residential properties however it is conditioned to blend in design, materials and similar colors to match all buildings so as not to be aesthetically offensive. The site currently contains building structures which are .seen from some of the surrounding residential properties. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - -- - -- -- - -- - - _ - 20.a,b 21.c,d No, the proposed project will not create any impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities as it provides its own. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historical archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? No, there will be no significant archaeological, prehistoric or historic destruction or adverse physical/aesthetic effects as there are not prehistoric or historic buildings or objects on the site. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique, ethnic cultural values or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? No, there are no unique ethnic cultural values anticipated to be affected nor any known religious or sacred uses to be impacted as this proposed use is within an existing building that has no restriction or impact on the potential impact area. 11 Soudwastem Colifomia Assodadon Of Sevendi-day Rdvendsts 11330 Pkrce Street P.O. Banc 8050 RMeeslde. CA 92515. (91W 359-5800 goy April 6, 1994 Letter of Intent: This is to state that the Southeastern California Association of Seventh -day Adventists is initiating an escrow to purchase land known as Parcel 5, of Parcel Map No. 6462, in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 77 of Parcel , Maps, pages 55 and 56, records of said county, being a subdivision of a portion of Lots 9 and 10, Hermosa Rancho, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, page 29, records of said County. SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION ow OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS - BUYER Roger W. Heinrich - Vice President Date ZAMPESE & DE BENEDET, A PARTNERSHIP - SELLER P � Date' C U Soudwastem California Assodadon Of Sevw1fi-doy ,dsM 11330 Pleas Street. P.O.8= W50 PAMrsfde.01 MIS. W 3S9-SSW 909 April 6, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: As legal owner of certain real property identified as Parcel 5, of Parcel Map No. 6462, An _the City _of _Grand__Terr_ace, County_ of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 77 of Parcel Maps, pages -55 and __ 56, records -of -said -county;- being -a - subdivision of a -portion of Lots 9 and 10, Hermosa Rancho, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, page 29, records of said County, we hereby authorize the signatures of Jack Booker and/or Bernie Gibbs to act as our agent in behalf of the signing of documents pertaining to building permits and development of this property. SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS Roger . Heinrich- Vice President y- '7 -9 y Date SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 1992-1993 school year 84 students 1993-1994 projected 97-104 students This school is being designed for a maidmum of 200 students due to limited outdoor recreational areas of the site. This limit is not anticipated for at least S years after the new building is completed AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM The after school program provides supervised play and study time for students that cannot go home after school. This will take place in the multipurpose room and in the playground areas of the site. All pick up of students shall be done through the school office area for control and safety of the children. LTIPURPOSE ROOM The Multipurpose room will provide assembly space for the students during inclement weather, inside lunch space, and special presentations for the school famny. The use of the basketball court will be limited to public use based upon availability, given church and school priorities fiaL SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM The school does not utilize any type of bus transportation. Presently all students are dropped of by their parents. Over the past few years only one student used the public transportation system which has a bus stop approximately 200 feet from this site. It is not anticipated to operate a private bus system for the students by the school or conferenee. --- 11 Contours: Does the topogmphypro....e drainage without the heed for erosion c, hear /evel areas forbui/dims, spertsAeJd.;,iilaygroundr to iWideMSioa? Yes, the site is presently used for structures and playgrounds. The new construction will not create any new need for erosion control. Traffic Cinmiatioa: Is the anav/iaoo sul reo4 0o sodfmm the s/t4 to sv1R#,hsod/a the r b(bft prdestnaos (a' 17dtenjcmwtoszhovlaodem&7=7WJA*0(Ad= tlonpatternmasshesettohandleM&AYUsonsitgall to the dtnp-0t9'andpA*-vpsmvofthesrhonlaod4 t6nm thesita) The proposed circulation separates the ingress and egress from the school. The proposed circulation provides improved access to the school but also to the church buildings and day care. Development: DoesthesitemasterplanlnneJudealafoatfo�(a�a/lphysirdladuatioot�cyGtiesaad(b)cnoceptaa/ m"mrsrtelsodsrawandh igaaoo jVAO rM Sbm and Shape: Are the stae sod shape of a/l C,&U taems delmmked by the oambar of oax)ants and the .ffCfj M!S142" wasworme&Odo1oA71-P . . : . .... ........--_._._.. _- ..__ The design of the das=oms and school layout were determined from the Seventh Day Adventist Conference guidelines as wells as the local administration inpuL Expendability: Does the dcxign sAbw,8r pvteottal ml7t' ud entnllme 4 tdd' j'Wj s and 4Mgj s to / va*ol Whit. m theloo�tangeplansofthesz*av/? , This is the culmination of the Church's long-range plans for the school. Should the need arise for further expansion another school site would be opened up by surrounding churches and conference. Outside Air. Please darihe the av &k4-bo systevn for the satooL Ciro the windows he opened orate therAvd S0=.7Does the wff&1.ptbosystem addmcr thetssue oforiots/ arrhao,-v of.MW The ventilation system proposed will allow for natural vendladiom The high windows in each classroom will be operable.to allow natural ventilation while the lower windows w111 be faced for security reasons. The systems wig meet the current energy requk ment of Title 24, The state energy standards for non residential buildings. Character_ Is the amUlacrurdl solutioi. orderly, pleasant and apprtropriate !o COaler..,Joraiy education - a OhjSiC21 ej7WIVnmen1tosatis!yemodonalneedsandstimulatespiritualandintelleazwlgrnwth. Yes. Safety: Aivfzrrnitm4 e:rrcrrora�cripmavtatrdp/ayapparatusdesignedtoptecrarI(S&VararalfaffuteorbnWkageaad tb ndax the ter? Land for Parking and Access Roads: PsnVffg /brsmaUschools is arranged so these schools use a combined pat�ing atra and buss Iaadingatra In this mncepS mintmam trquttrd for this arrangement is a6eut 3 acres plus Ms.f foreachaatostall Howdoesjvzrrptnjeacnmfiwm with thwpoGcy7 Because this school us a church school the parking is shared by all. The layout allows for safe drop-off and pick-up of students during the week and allows safe access to -the church facilities on the weekend Azure hills Seventh -day Adventist Church 22633 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 (909) 825-8611 r%Fuu o, i994 Planning Department City of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Gentlemen: The Azure Hills Seventh -day Adventist Church- is at the present time negotiating to purchase -property near, the -Grand Terrace Are Station upon which we plan to build a school, as well as provide 100 additional new parking spaces at the back or rear of our church property adjacent to the newly purchased property. This additional parking should help alleviate the parking problems that we have been experiencing- for some time. _ In addition to the school, building and additional parking spaces, there will also be a new' access and egress road via City Center Court. We will endeavor to educate our church members to utilize the new parking spaces and the new road to improve the traffic flow on Saturday morning. We hope this information will be helpful to you as you look at the plans for future expansion here at Azure Hills. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Ee't,�O Bernie Gibbs Administrator V k Stamdard Unft (Mast Mn Mount) High Pressuro Sodium LemP(1) Metal Halide Lsmp(1) Opt"TW* 70W 100W iSOW(2) 25OW 40OW 175W 250W 003W 20/30 . CS7212 CUM 232 CS72S2 CS7262 CS7142 CS7152 Oe*n22 CS7213 CS7223 CS7233 CS7259 CS7263 (57143 CS7153 peslplt 40 CS7214 C$7224 CST231 CumCS7264 CS7144 CS7154 Oea "50 CS7215 CS7225 CS7235 CS7255 CS7265 ' CSt145 CS7155 kltelnel p%M MOU ft wU gcwm adete 114'-2%' O.0. hodwnw tenons 81eChe wM W kKklded vWl alalda'd unlL ' s Oared Aran Mou~ " 6Y• Round CA41-3' Ole. Pbie One bucket am east be adeted klresch stendrd w* used. PoleTop Mounting III ' saame hemW �.,.: ral" ISO* . sktoi. OWJW r'0' ooaW"r aawllo- aes)e• --- -- -- cmm c mu CPA48 cross CHIN CA43R CA44t: cA4sR CA16f: ' �• ems. = : +-t-. - • 4.�, rtnr '� • + 144 CS, 000SedmOiderSMOPWAs~"hkhkldudesm m*Vwff(s)• - SpptNfer s000naoodsles 24V-3' OA. POIS bP ins 18 rId L 0 BARTON ROAD'' COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN CORRIDOR LEGEND ® GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) . VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) ADMIN ISTRATIVE\PROFESSIONAL (AP) Q MASTER PLAN AREA p-9y-o/ EXHIBIT III SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE Joann Lombardo April 12,1994 Page 2 JK/ct 11 6. Pay all capital improvement fund fees. 7. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City. FORESTRY AND FIRE W..RDEN DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center 385 No. Arrowhead Avenue, first Floor • San Bernardino. CA 92415.0186 (714) 387.4212, 387.4213 Ben COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY DICK WILLIAMS, Director EMERGENCY SERVIM tirnhtq the communaies of: Angelus Oaks QRM TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R,441 BaldY Musa 1312 Rivet Black Meadow Landing `�� Caron Federal Pisan Date: </ (CDF') Chino Hills _ City of Crond Tenace IC o4VaOZ44zt city of Needles To: , Copper Mountaht Mesa D-nwo Atrpon Fire Department Reference NDevare umber: 77 r.1M,rw �cu Fawnskin Applicant: Al c r I fataeld ilrlrndelc Z'L G 33 1?0AW vs/ e-e6AW Icon mmixrla Location : Oly at li:Vhland - - - .;3catastrad Vnllxy JoM,son Valk-y dosirua Tter (CI)F1 Loma Ands THE FOLLOWING FIRE DEPART /MT CONDITIONS SRALL BE CQ11dpLETED PRiBRIJs valley RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP t - vile creek ►Jeatont: A site inspection final is required to verify conditions of ap�1�'aftillew Acres have been met. Morongo valley Mt. Udy Oak Glen R F-1. Private road maintenance.. including but not limited to0ek He's grading and snow removal, shall be provided. Written documentatiobrkMaat„ shall be submitted to the fire department having jurisdiction. Privatelkc Dam Eire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with a minimum Phtion paving width of twenty (20) feet. Islonerntwt. Red Mourtaln R - Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow of San Antonke dev pmant shall be approved S 9ollt y Lake jurisdiction. The developer shall furnish the f fire departmentnt ha� IN Valk •y eopies of the water system wit a n valley steal be o e ational andam,prvednt the fire department wa prior sto�Yucaipa construction oecurr n . The required f re flow s a ca volley determ ae the appropr ate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide For the Determinat on of Fire Flow.r$ water systems shall have min eight 8) incn ma ns, —sixinch risers. Required fire flow is Zr'� � C� f'f�j Tested at 4966 ' Ci 1p/-il HARRY 1A k'•AY$ MIARSHA TVROCi Ito$I Pis bi:t NAIIF:/.rJ•. �.t!.11e. iit!rl;!}p!r �'.1•tl :1;:•:., t :• ..:t.. Lltyrl•' J<7N I) 1.41t:C1°i fir:c:rrrt Cisllc:t LARRY il,- 10 R r••.r! : 1• /.1 ROSE47 t HAFANV!Cq APPRO Page Three Fire Dept. Ref. 2 6 19A � (/O, BP F6. A minimum fuel modification zone is required to comply with county standards. BP F7 Prior to framing construction, approved fire hydrants and (OW fire by rant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall be six (6) inch in diameter with a minimum of one four (4) inch and one two and a half (2 1/2) inch connection as specified by the fire department. The design of the fire hydrant and fire hydrant pavement marker shall be approved by the fire department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be three hundred (300) feet with the exception of single family residential which may be increased to six hundred (600) feet maximum. In areas where. snow removal occurs or non -paved roads exist the blue reflective hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post three feet from the hydrant. BP F8. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the and of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet, except as identified in the development code and approved -by the fire chief. ( ) See attached diagram of approved turnarounds. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: 0 F9. prior to final inspection, commercial or industrial buildings sha post street address with a minimum of eight (8) inch numbers. Street addresses shall be visible from the street and during the hours of darkness they shall be automatically illuminated. where building setbacks exceed- one hundred (100) feet from roadway additional non -illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at property access entrance. APPROVED • SAN BEftNARIX COUNTY FIR[ WARKF __,._ Fire Dept- Ref. Page NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS - I. 4 ��AV ' nrA •iA?~ r'9rC�JVV /Questions and comanents may be directed to: Fire Protection Planning County goverment Center, First Floor 385 North Arrowhead -Avenue gan Bernardino, Cali orn a 92415-0186 • Phone 909 ) Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief Cou y ire Warden BY : ] FAf� l.t' Captain Officer Fire Protection planning c: (forms/GTcomm 4/93) 0 l ,r �r r' r ***END*** U DATE: May 17, 1994 F.:8:� Q:::R' T. CRA ITEM: ( ) COUNCIL ITEM: (x) MEETING DATE: May 26, 1994 BUBO CT: CRIME PREVENTION OBJECTIVES FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED x_ The City Council has received input from the Crime Prevention Committee outlining a potential concern that the role of the Crime Prevention Committee is not clearly outlined. This is o+ due to the changes in the last few years, such as the hiring of the full-time Community Services Officer along with the large base of volunteers which includes the very successful Citizens Patrol Program. Attached is a copy of the guidelines for the Crime Prevention Committee and, in reading the responsibili- ties, they are somewhat general in description. The Committee is an Advisory Committee to the City Council and, due to the many changes in past years, it would be appropriate to redefine their responsibilities. By working with the Crime Prevention Committee, it could be determined what changes need to be made to redirect their efforts in coordinating with the Community Services Officer and Crime Prevention Volunteers. COUNCIL APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO MEET WITH THE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE TO RECEIVE THEIR INPUT AND RECOMMEND POLICY CHANGES THAT MAY MORE EFFECTIVELY GUIDE THE COMMITTEE. TS:bt COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # &PR 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace Crnia 92324-5295 Civic Center (909)824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 Byron R. Matteson Mayor Ronald M. Christianson Mayor Pro Tempore ene Carlstrom Herman Hilkey Jim Singley Council Members Thomas J. Schwab City Manager 12.515 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1994 MEETING DATE: May 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Landscaping and Street Lighting District-89-1 F.Y. 1994-1995 Levy of Assessment In 1989, City Council required a developer to form an Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining the landscaping and lighting as required by the Conditions of Approval. Subsequently, two other developments were required to be included in such a program and these were annexed to the original A.D. 89-1 as Annexation No. 1. Each year, City Council by early August must consider the costs associated with the maintenance of these districts, and adopt as presented or modify the Engineer's "Report" providing for assessments to be placed on the tax rolls to cover costs of maintenance and operation during the next fiscal year. Staff has reviewed the expenditures for the last fiscal (1993-1994) year, and based on our best estimate at this time, the costs of operation and maintenance should approximately equal the assessments levied and collected. It is our estimate, that these costs and assessments should remain for the coming fiscal year and will adequately cover the costs. Attached is a copy of Engineer's "Report" for the F.Y. 1994-1995, along with the Order of Procedure and copies of the Resolution to be adopted. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT CITY COUNCIL: 1. Adopt Resolution ordering City Engineer to prepare Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimate, Diagram and Assessment (Engineer's "Report"). 2. Adopt Resolution approving Engineer's "Report". 3. Adopt Resolution of Intention. JK1ct COUNOL AGENDA r EU # g 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, COST ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT AND REPORT 4 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF TEE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY AFTER FORMATION OF A DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, desires to initiate proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for a street lighting district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 .of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in what is known and designated as CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89�-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, AREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1994, and ending June 30, 1995; and, , there has been submitted to this City Council for its consideration at this time, a map showing the boundaries of the area to be annoed and that territory affected by the levy of the assessment for the above referenced fiscal year, and the territory proposed to be annexed, said map further showing and describing in general the works of improvement proposed to be maintained in said District, said description being sufficient to identify the works of improvement and the areas proposed to be assessed for said maintenance thereof; and, SECTION 4. That KICAK AND ASSOCIATES, is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council, a "Report" relating to said annual assessment and levy in accordance with the provisions of Article IV, commencing with Section 22565 of Chapter 1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTIONS. That upon completion, said "Report" shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its boa pursuant to Sections 22623 and 22624 of said Streets and Highways Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1"4, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: BYRON MATTESON, MAYOR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ATTEST: BRENDA STANFILL, CITY CLERK CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" FOR ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR IN A DISTRICT WHIM SAID CITY the CITY COUNCIL, of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer's "Report" for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 4, LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, WE , there has now been presented to this City Council the "Report" as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the "Report" as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed, as set forth in said "Report. " NOW, T1 MEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. L, BRENDA STANFIL.L, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. _ was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the _ meeting of said City Council held on the day of , IM, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN. EXECUTED this day of , 1994, at GRAND TERRACE, California. 4, BRENDA STANFIEL, CITY CLERK CITY OF GRAND TERRACE STATE OF CALIFORNIA [SEAL.] f. SECTION I That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the "Report" of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof. SECTION 3. That the "Report" of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which "Report" is for maintenance for the fiscal year 1993_1994, is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Cleric SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention Of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer's "Report," and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and e�qxm of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said "Report." SECTION S. The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer's "Report," referenced and so SECTION 9. Any lots or parcels of land known as public property, as the same are defined in Section 22663 of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, which are included within the boundaries of the District, shall be omitted and exempt from any assessment to be made under these proceedings to cover any of the costs and fir expenses of said improvement and maintenance work. SECTION 10. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THURSDAY, THE 14th DAY OF May, 1994, AT THE HOUR OF 6.30 P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE • «1 �11 :1 • 1 1 • :1 1 1 . • • �. BY THIS CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE ECTENT OF THE SECTION U. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, Sun, newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be not less than tea (10) days before the date set for said Public Hearing. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN R. HARPER, CITY ATTORNEY 11 Planning Department DATE: May 18, 1994 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Participation in Development of a East Valley Transportation Demand Forecast Model RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Agreement with the City of San Bernardino COST TO CITY: $5,834 in fiscal year 1994-1995 for model development; approximately $500 - $800 per year thereafter for model maintenance. �i 1 The City of San Bernardino has invited six East Valley cities, including the City of Grand Terrace, to participate in the development of a subregional transportation travel demand forecast model. Other cities participating in this model include Colton, Highland, Loma Linda, Redlands and Rialto. Participation in development of this East Valley Transportation Model will benefit Grand Terrace in the following ways: Currently, the City is dependent on the SCAG RIVSAN model to determine regional transportation impacts. SANBAG qualifies Grand Terrace for regional transportation funds, including Measure I and Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), based on RIVSAN projections of traffic demand. SANBAG's recent request that the City prepare a deficiency plan for I-215 also was based on the findings of the RIVSAN model. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 8C 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 a (909) 824-6621 Ll Planning Department staff has reviewed the attached Agreement, and recommends the City Council authorize execution of the Agreement enabling Grand Terrace to participate in the development and maintenance of an East Valley Transportation Demand Forecast Model. Respectively submitted: Joann Lombardo Interim Community Development Director Attachments: Cover letter from City of San Bernardino and Agreement 3 Joann Lombardo City of Grand Terrace RE: Agreement for Traffic Model Cost Allocation File No. 6.44-5 April 27, 1994 Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this project, and we hope to include you in the upcoming meetings with the consultant. Cordially, R ZG. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer RGH:tg Enclosure WHEREAS, the traffic model developed pursuant to this Agreement shall be referred to as the "East Valley Sub Area Model"; and WHEREAS, "Grand Terrace" and San Bernardino do mutually desire to specify, herein, the terms and conditions under which said project is to be completed, financed, and maintained; and WHEREAS, development of the expanded model is proposed for the 1994/95 fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE - SAN BERNARDINO SHALL -- MODEL DEVELOPMENT PERIOD 1.01 Perform necessary contract negotiations and administer the contract with the selected development firm for creation of said model. 1.02 Amend Agreement with JHK and Associates to include the other cities in the East Valley Sub Area, with the cost for the expanded model distributed among the participating agencies as set forth on Attachment A. 1.03 Act as Lead Agency in securing Environmental Review approval, prepare all required reports, agreements, coordinate activities of the consultant, advise "Grand Terrace" of the needed data, hold task force meetings with involved agencies on progress and model development. 1.04 Prepare a working model consistent with County Transportation model as determined by SANBAG and acceptable to SLAG. 1.05 Arrange for collection of data necessary for the development of the model. 1.06 Submit a model run for review and comment to "Grand Terrace" prior to final submittal to SANBAG and include "Grand Terrace" in the developmental meetings leading to the final model. 1.07 Submit quarterly bills to "Grand Terrace" for their proportionate share of the costs received by San Bernardino from the Consultant for development of the East Valley Sub Area Model. 1.08 Submit a model run for "Grand Terrace" of their street network upon completion of project. Page 2 SECTION TWO - "Grand Terrace" SHALL -- 2.01 Assist San Bernardino in accomplishing the required data collection for development of the model and correct input of land use types and transportation networks. 2.02 Accept responsibility for the share of the project costs for the enlargement of the model to include the city of "Grand Terrace" and reimburse San Bernardino, within 30 days after receipt of an itemized statement of cost. "Grand Terrace's" share is estimated to be $5,834.00, but in no event shall "Grand Terrace's" total obligation under this agreement exceed the actual cost of enlarging the model as determined by the final contract change order issued to the selected consultant and reviewed by "Grand Terrace" provided that "Grand Terrace" may, at its sole discretion, in writing, authorize a greater amount for additional work as desired. 2.03 Execute this agreement in a timely manner, but in no case later than June 1, 1994, such that the project may proceed and be completed within the 1994/95 fiscal year with an anticipated completion date of November, 1994. 2.04 Make those arrangements that may be necessary for the collection of data on land use, transportation network and traffic counts, as may be necessary for accurate model development and/or maintenance. 2.05 Accept responsibility for the regular update information that is required to maintain an accurate model and notify the City of San Bernardino of major changes in land use, development and/or traffic count data necessary for the development and maintenance of the model. 2.06 Agree with the adopted cost accounting methods and charges to be levied for model maintenance and model runs as requested by "Grand Terrace" in that they reflect the actual hourly wages and benefits and overhead experienced by the City of San Bernardino for providing said service. Accept that changes in such charges shall occur as salaries are adjusted, benefit costs increase, and other such changes occur within the bargaining units within the City. 2.07 Agree to make no secondary sales of model information or output that extend beyond the legal boundaries of the city of "Grand Terrace". 2.08 Agree to a uniform pricing schedule for model output or model runs that is to be provided to all third parties (private sector developers or consultants). Such rate shall be determined at annual meetings of all participants to the Page 4 supporting software. Negotiations shall consider overall cost for model development, equipment, and support services. 4.03 After termination, the withdrawing City may request model runs and data, but only as defined as a third party and subject to the hourly charges established for third party requests. 4.04 Failure to provide necessary data for updates as required, or failure to provide them in a timely manner will result in that portion of the model being inaccurate. Repeated failure to AW supply data or make efforts at model maintenance may result in a request to terminate this agreement. 4.05 Should the City of San Bernardino terminate this agreement, a copy of the full model at the time of termination shall be provided to the local traffic agency (SANBAG) for use by the participants. The supporting software, hardware and other such items will remain the property of the City of San Bernardino. THIS AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties involved. Page 6