Loading...
04/13/1995FILE COPY 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 Civic Center (909) 824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 Fax (909)783-2600 Byron R. Matteson Mayor Gene Carlstrom Mayor Pro Tempore Herman Hilkey Jim Singley Dan Buchanan Council Members Thomas J. Schwab City Manager April 13, 1995 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursday - 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 13, 1995 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 P.M. 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order - * Invocation - Pastor Roger Greenwalt, First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace * Pledge of Allegiance - * Roll Call - AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCII. RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Approve 1. Approval of 03/23/95 Minutes 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA041395 Approve 3. CLOSED SESSION - Real Estate Negotiation (22797 & 22799 Barton) ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation - Earthquake Preparedness Month - April 1995 B. Proclamation - Natural Resources Conservation Month - Apnl 1995 C. Proclamation - National Community Development Week - April 10 - 16, 1995 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council - member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. COUNCIL AGENDA 04/13/95 PAGE 3 OF 3 4 m PENDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES �a 4 0111 1u 1 Y 1; A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 23, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Chairman 4, Gene Carlstrom, Vice -Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Dan Buchanan, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, Secretary John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Bernard Simon, Finance Director Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director Captain Denham, Sheriff's Department John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MARCH 9. 1995 CRA MINUTES CRA-95-20 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN CARLSTROM, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER BUCHANAN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the March 9, 1995 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA032395 CRA-95-21 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register CRA032395. STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY CRA-95-22 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt the Statement of Investment Policy for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace. Chairman Matteson convened CRA meeting at 6:20 P.M. Chairman Matteson Reconvened CRA meeting at 7:45 P.M. ADD THE REHABILITATION OF THE OLD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUILDING FOR THE HOUSING/BUILDING AND SAFETY/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C R A AGENDA ITEM NO. f INDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO.041395 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR P10252 CASH P10260 CASH P10261 CASH P10282 HALLY CAPPIELLO 31293 SCOTT MORRISON & ASSOC. n 31327 EWING IRRIGATION a 31332 KITCHEN CONCEPT BY HARLOW a 31336 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS 31342 PIP KICAK AND ASSOCIATES 31353 ONE STOP LANDSCAPE 31357 Z PETTY CASH 31372 SNYDER'S PEST CONTROL ^P Iv DESCRIPTION CASHIERS CHECK TO EMERALD ESCROW TO PURCHASE HOUSE AT 21815 VIVIENDA CASHIERS CHECK TO FEDERAL RESERVE BANK TO PURCHASE U.S. TREASURY BILL CASHIERS CHECK TO FEDERAL RESERVE BANK TO PURCHASE U.S. TREASURY BILL HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT INTERN,3/14-3/23/95 AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE ASBESTOS REPORT, 11695 CANAL IRRIGATION SUPPLIES, 22610 RAVEN GAS RANGE, 22610 RAVEN LANDSCAPE MATERIAL,22610 RAVEN ENGINEERING SERVICES,2/27-3/36/95 (CLERICAL WORK) DUMP CHARGES FOR 22610 RAVEN REIMBURSE PETTY CASH FUMIGATE 11881 PRESTON/22610 RAVEN AMOUNT $ 69,988.50 500,000.00 500,000.00 223.40 390.00 12.22 365.27 91.50 44.00 91.59 47.81 1,834.00 Tt-t-V of Granh Ourrart �r�clttmtt�ta�t CALIF MU MRMQUMM PREPAREDNESS MOMM April 0" WHEREAS, the State of California continues to mverlence demmuting sdsmic activity that causes lose of We and property, as evidenced by the magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles County on January 17,19K the magniturde 73 Landers earthquake in San Bernardino County on June 28, LM (the largest to occur in California since 1952) and the magnitude 7.1 Cape Mendocino earthquake in Humbolt County on April 25, IM; and WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilson has acpressed his commitment to earthquake preparedness by proclaiming April as California Earthquake Preparedness Month and urging Californians to learn earthquake safety mascara; and WHEREAS, the loos of life and property cam be gratly reduced if appropriate earthquake pe+elrar+ed>ress maastnare taken before, during and after a damaging earthquake; and WHEREAS, these lifesaving procedures will be highlighted doing the month of April as the Governor's Office of Ener geney Services, with the assistance of city and county emergency services offices and other governmental agencies, service organizations, educational institutions, businesses and Neighborhood Watch groups, provides earthquake safety information to citizens throughout the state; and WHEREAS, the masaares pressed in the "THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE, READY? OR NOT." campaign should increase public awareness regarding proper procedures to follow daring a tremor, and WI�REAS, this important earthquake safety information should be studied and observed throughout the year in order to reduce injuries, loss of life and property damage during an earthquake; „ NOW, TBEREFORE9 I Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim April LM as California Earthquake Preparedness Month and encourage ail to enhance their knowledge and awareness of proper safety measures to follow before, during and after an earthquake. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. This 13th day of April, 199S. CfttU of (6ranb 01 PrratP t1rvr1avaatt46'jan NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION MONTH April 1995 WHEREAS, the people across this land wish to live in harmony with natural resources, and wish to bequeath a better Earth for our children and grandchildren; and WHEREAS, conservationists across our beautiful country work hand -in -hand with the American people to conserve all natural resources to create a healthy land; and WHEREAS, leadership for conservation of natural resources on private lands is provided by a partnership of conservation districts, state conservation agencies, and USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Services; and WHEREAS, in appreciation for the efforts of landowners and landusers to conserve our natural resources; and WHEREAS, April is the month designated to celebrate Earth Day and the 60th , anniversary of America's soil and water conservation movement on private lands; and WHEREAS, now is the time to increase awareness among all Americans of the . +� importance of our natural resources; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on ' behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of April 1995 as Natural Resources ;. .Zz� Conservation Month, and urge all citizens to recognize the importance of conservation in our — Et;, communities and join in the celebration of the land. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. This 13th day of April, 1995. E 99 Litt of (Sranb 01 ErrttzF proriamatI4,10n NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK April 10 - 16, 1995 WHEREAS, the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program has operated since 1975 to provide local governments with the resources required to address pressing neighborhood and human service needs for persons of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Program continues to assume increasing importance as an instrument for meeting pressing community development needs in affordable housing, job creation or retention, human services, capital improvements, and public infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the nature of the Community Development Block Grant Program, with its diversity of program design and administration, and its ability to respond to locally determined priorities, has caused Congress and the nation to appreciate the critical value of the program, and ____ x the significant number of non-profit organizations, programs and projects that rely on its funds for support; and � WHEREAS a week recognizing national community development will encourage g g ty p rage local jj governments, non-profit organizations, and community residents throughout the nation to reaffirm the significance and diversity of their local community development program efforts toward <- meeting the needs of persons of low and moderate income; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on .—•� behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize April 10 through April 16, 1995, as National �c Community Development Week '95; and urge Congress and the Administration to recognize the outstanding work being accomplished locally and nationally by the Community Development Block Grant Program and the importance of this program to the people of San Bernardino County oc and the Nation. _ .- &&AAL.i _ 1%1� Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. This 13th day of April, 1995. __, c PENDING CITY I' COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1 DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:041395 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR P10247 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P10248 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P10249 COMCAST CABLEVISION P10251 PATRIZIA MATERASSI P10252 MICHELLE LAURENT P10254 LISA STARLING P10255 PERS c) P10256 C SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P10257 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P10258 COMCAST CABLEVISION P10259 JEFFERY STALLINGS P10262 a SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P10263 COMCAST CABLEVISION P10264 I SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P10265 D SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY DESCRIPTION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95 REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITIES SEMINAR BALANCE DUE, BUTTONS FOR GRAND TERRACE DAYS BIRTHDAY BONUS RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 3/10/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95 BIRTHDAY BONUS CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/95 AMOUNT $ 65.13 51.03 81.02 187.30 265.13 50.00 4,898.90 285.41 115.17 123.38 50.00 47.48 65.65 138.50 106.80 c CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 3 DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO: 041395 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P10284 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95 $ 95.27 P10285 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95 172.11 P10286 COMCAST CABLEVISION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95 142.00 P10288 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH INSURANCE,4/95,ADDITION 482.68 P10289 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE DENTAL/LIFE INSURANCE,4/95,ADDITIONS 34.45 P10290 MICHELLE LAURENT DEPOSIT,TEE-SHIRTS,GRAND TERRACE DAYS 1,007.25 P10291 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95 247.62 P10292 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95 53.83 P10293 COMCAST CABLEVISION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95 111.36 P10294 VERA HERNANDEZ BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00 P10295 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY DISABILITY INSURANCE FOR APRIL,1995 646.78 P10296 PERS RETIREMENT FOR PAY ROLL ENDING 3/24/95 5,027.27 P10297 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95 152.00 P10298 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95 360.14 P10299 COMCAST CABLEVISION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95 149.84 P10300 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/3/95 436.31 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 5 1 DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:041395 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 31296 DORA HOUCK REFUND, OVERPAYMENT OF HEALTH INSURANCE $ 61.55 31297 KAREN THOMAS REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 5.00 31298 MAUREEN SEEGRAVES REFUND, RECREATION PROGRAM 5.00 31299 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. LIFE INSURANCE,H.GRANT (6 MONTHS) 701.98 31300 RICHARD CHURCHWELL REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 7.00 31301 SUSAN VAGUE REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 3.60 31302 BARBARA OTIWAY REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 8.00 31303 VICKI CLARK REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 2.40 31304 KEITH LEAVITT REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 8.00 31305 JOSEPH SEIB REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 2.80 31306 MARIE WALKER REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES 10.80 31307 BLANCA LINDSEY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 35.00 31308 AA EQUIPMENT RECOIL ASSEMBLY FOR BLOWER 140.97 31309 A & A PRODUCE COMPANY PROLliUCE FOR CHILD CARE 185.20 31310 AT & T PHONES FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 6.98 31311 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN SENIOR NEWSLETTERS (4 MONTHS) 568.92 oi CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7 DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:041395 OUTSTANDING CHECKS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 31327 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES,CIVIC CENTER $ 58.35 31328 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS MAIL 15.50 31329 FINE LINE 31330 FRIDAY'S 31331 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 31333 HENAGON LIMITED,COLTON 31334 HONDA OF REDLANDS 31335 HONEYWELL, INC. 31337 INLAND ACOUSTICS 31338 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LTD. 31339 INMARK 31340 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP 31341 JANI-KING 31342 KICAK & ASSOCIATES 31343 KIRK PAPER & GRAPHICS AWARDS, SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL LANDSCAPE SERVICES, TERRACE PINES-MARCH,1995 EMPLOYEE CHILD CARE SERVICES,APRIL,1995 SAND FOR SAND BAGS, STORM DAMAGE SERVICE LAWN MOWER MAINTENANCE HVAC UNIT,CIVIC CENTER,APRIL,1995 REPLACE CEILING TILES, CIVIC CENTER BUS FOR RECREATION EXCURSION NAME PLATE, BADGE, AND STAMPS BAKERY GOODS, CHILD CARE CENTER JANITORIAL SERVICES, CHILD CARE CENTER ENGINEERING SERVICES,2/27-3/26/95, (CLERICAL) ASSORTED PAPER, CRIME PREVENTION 100.00 200.00 788.50 148.16 137.79 1,114.24 135.16 1,325.00 199.01 71.29 759.00 2,062.50 368.01 r CITY OF GRAND TERRACE m DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO.041395 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 31360 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER REPAIRS AT HOLLY AND ARLISS $ 24,108.65 31361 RICHARD ROLLINS OPEN/CLOSE TERRACE HILLS PARK,MARCH,1995 180.00 31362 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES,APRIL-JUNE,1'995 2,670.00 31363 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS/EQUIPMENT 32.44 31364 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ELECTION COSTS, 11/8/95 200.00 31365 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DUMP CHARGES FOR 2/23-3/8/95 279.03 31366 SAN BERNARDINO MEDICAL PRE-EMPLOYMENT/TB TESTS 153.00 31367 THOMAS SCHWAB AUTO ALLOWANCE, APRIL,1995 200.00 31368 SECURITY DATA GROUP SECURITY MONITORING,CIVIC CENTER,APRIL-JUNE,1995 75.00 31369 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE,INC. SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS, FEB.1995 508.34 31370 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY PROGRAM SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE CENTER 363.18 31371 LOUISE SMITH REIMBURSEMENT FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.02 31373 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRIC FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES, PARKS, SIGNALS, STREET LIGHTS, AND MERIDIANS 10,698.12 31374 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY GAS FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 630.82 31375 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLIES 295.50 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - March 23, 1995 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March 23, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Mayor Gene Carlstrom, Mayor Pro Tempore 4, Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Dan Buchanan, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director Bernard Simon, Finance Director Captian Denham, Sheriff's Department John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: None The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church of Grand Terrace, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Singley. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6:00 P.M. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6:20 P.M. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Captain Denham. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, introduced Tonya Nelson, the new Community Services Officer, to the Council and the Citizens of Grand Terrace. 2A. Recycling Family of the Month - Februga 1995 Mayor Matteson announced that the Pitzonka Family of 12246 Pascal are the recipients of the Recycling Family of the Month Award and of the local merchants gift certificates from Sub Depot, Verles's Fancy Pets, Fish and Grooming, Buttercup Bakery, and Flowers by Yvonne. 2B. Proclamation - Architecture Week March 26 - April 1 1995 Mayor Matteson read and presented Larry Vesley with the proclamation of Architecture Week March 26 - April 1, 1995. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #�p 03/23/95 Council Minutes Page 3 Council that they would have the meeting on Saturday, April 22, 1995. He further asked the Council if they would be willing to sponsor a little league team as a group. It was agreed that the Council would sponsor a team. The City Attorney will also sponsor a team. He also reported that he and the City Manager met with the Chamber President, Don Larkin, and the Chamber Treasurer, Frank Berry. He stated that he felt that they made a lot of ground with the Chamber and that they would be meeting again once the Chamber Board of Directors has had a chance to meet and go over the options discussed between the Chamber of Commerce and the City to see if there is something that can be ' worked out between the two. Mayor Pro Tern Carlstrom, reported that he attended a meeting with the Chamber of Commerce and stated that there seemed to be a renewing of the spirit of the Chamber and that they would be moving into the Barton Center on La Crosse. He stated that he believes that the Chamber will ask the City to assist them in moving. Councilmember Buchanan, reported that he attended Sharon Korgan's Retirement party at the Senior Center on Friday. He also reported that he had the opportunity to meet the new Community Services Officer, Tonya Nelson. He asked Assistant City Manager Donlevy to tell the Community what they can do to receive assistance if they experienced storm damage. 46W Assistant Cijy Manager Donlevy, responded that there are a number of ways they can receive assistance. He recommended that citizens contact the City for information. Councilmember Buchanan, asked whether or not people can take advantage of the low interest loans the Community Redevelopment Agency offers for repairs on their homes that are due to storm damage. City Manager Schwab, responded in the affirmative, if they qualify under the income guidelines. Councilmember Buchanan, reported that he is looking into the Grey Water Guide, and will pass it along to Council and Staff to see if we can implement the program where appropriate. He also reported that he received a letter from one of the Councilmembers with the Town of Apple Valley asking for support to have her participate on the California Integrated Waste Management Board, and questioned if anyone knew this Councilmember. Mayor Matteson, stated that he has reservations voting for someone that he doesn't know. COY Manager Schwab, stated that the California Integrated Waste Management Board positions are paid positions which pays over $90,000 dollars a year. 03/23/95 Council Minutes Page 5 Iawlzff' 1_ l 7A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Amending the Grand Terrace Municipal Code by Providing Standards for the Regulation of Adult Business and Limiting them in a Designated Adult Business (AB) Overlay Zone: Providing for Licensing and Regulation of Adult Businesses: Providing Additional Health and Safety Regulations for Adult Businesses: an ReneaLin9 Sections Inconsistent Therewith, 4 CC-95-26 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCHANAN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (COUNCILMEMEBR HILKEY WAS ABSENT), to approve the second reading of the Adult Entertainment Ordinance and the amended Negative Declaration and direct staff to process a General Plan amendment to amend the Industrial Districts. NEW BUSINESS 8A. Utility User Fee Discussion Mayor Matteson, stated that he is totally against the Utility User Fee, other alternatives should be looked at instead of turning to raising taxes. Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom, stated that he is against the Utility User Fees at this time. Councilmember Buchanan, stated that he would not oppose the Utility User Fees if the quality of life would be altered due to lack of funds, he stated that the City doesn't have a lot of other sources to gain revenue. If the budget could be balanced without the Utility User Fees then he would be opposed to the fees just to have extra money, however, he would rather pay the extra money than have the quality of life decline here in the City. Councilmember Hilkgy, concurred with Councilmember Buchanan, he stated that he feels the community would rather have the Utility User Fee to sustain the quality of life rather than it declining, however, he feels that there are places that can be cut and would like the Sheriff's contract to be looked into as a place to cut and to shape the contract to the City's needs. Councilmember Singlex, stated that he requested that this item be placed on the agenda so the City Council is provided with the information before budget time so that the Utility User Fees can be an option. He read aloud the amount of money it would bring into the City; 1 % would bring in 139,000, 3 % would bring in 419,000, 5% would bring in 700,000, and 7% would bring in 978,000. He concurred with the Council that all areas of the budget should be looked at,however, the Utility User Fee should be there as an option. He directed staff to look into all areas where revenues can be increased so that the reserves do not have to be used once again. 03/23/95 Council Minutes Page 7 Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:45 p.m., until the next Regular CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, April 13, 1995. 11 MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace 11 CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace CRA ITEM ( XX) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT: COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP f4W Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING REQUIRED Discussion In January, 1995, the City of Grand Terrace was selected by the Integrated Waste Management Board to receive a $42,000 Household Hazardous Waste Grant for the production of an interactive video based game, "VutiW Waste" to educate elementary school children. The program is aimed at students in grades 3-6 and will include an educational video, a game "Virtual Waste", puzzles and quizzes. A key element is the production of the actual video. This will include students from Grand Terrace Schools and non -paid actors from Southern California. The location shots will be within Grand Terrace. In order to develop the video, the City has been required to hire Communications Support Group (CSG) Inc., a company specializing in Producing governmentleducational videos. CSG currently provides video services to numerous government organizations throughout California and the United states. Most notably, they serve as the coordinator of the video services for the City of Beverly Hills. They have won 3 ACE Awards (the Academy Awards for Video) and have a strong industry reputation for their quality and expertise. FISCAL IMPACT The contract cost for the services provided through CSG is $12,272.32 and outlined as the attachment to the Contract Services Agreement. The approved budget by the CIWMB was approximately $13,000, so the cost is under budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNICATION SUPPORT GROUP, INC. FOR VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES. ATTACHMENT CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT: VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REFORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #13 0 9. Parties agree that all video products resulting from this agreement become the sole property of the City of Grand Terrace and the California Integrated Waste Management Board, with all rights pertaining to the sale, reproduction, characters, names, concepts and story line. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (A Municipal Corporation) Date: CONTRACTOR LO-A TITLE Date: COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 10968 - SANTA ANA, CA 92711.0968 OFFICE (714) 288.0100 FAX (714) 288.0313 Rudeet Estimate for "Virtual Waste" Proicct Manaecmcnt: Exec. Producer/K.Risk - Pre -production planning, Production review and oversight, producer and crew scheduling, meetings, misc., adminstration, budget prcperation - 15 hrs (t7) $45 :...................................................................... $675.00 Prc-Production: Producer -Scheduling, rewrites, location scouting, storyboirding, misc.admininistration - 20 hrs @ $30.................... $500.00 .......................................................................... Production Assistant - Equipment pick-up and buying.................................. craft services 8 hrs L $12.................................................................................................................. $96.00 Production: Baled on 5-day shootine xchedule) Production Packagc Panasonic VFW-250 Broadcast - Quality Camera Sony 9900SP Portable VTR Sachticr Tripods (2) R" Monitor and Rattcnes Camcra and VTR 13nttcrncs and Chargcr AC Adaptcr Headphones tW Shotgun Microphone, Zcpplin and Fishpolc 5days Gal $350 a day ............................... ............... $1,750.00 ................................................................................... 6X6 Overhead Silk 5 days @ $24 ... ... .. $125.00 ...... ..... ............ ....................... ............. .... andbngs 5 days r7 $6 .. ........... ....................... $30 00 ..... . ...... . .................. ......... .. ...................... .. 2 C-Stands Gnl $ 15/week ................ ......... ............................$30 00 ............................................................ CarMounts - 2 days @ $10 .......................................................... ........................................................ $60.00 Light Kits - 2 L? $60/day ........... .......... $300.00 Craft Sen7ces for 5 days ( morning, Minch, ntavbc dinner) ............... . $500 00 Crew (5 days of shooting n 10 hrs a day) Producer- 50 hrs @ $30................................. ....................... ..................................................... $1,500.00 Camera Operator - 50 firs @ $20 ......................................$1,000.00 ... ............................ ............................. Production Assistant - 50 firs C� $12 ................... .......... $600.00 . ..................................................................... Production Assistant - 50 Itrs (r� $12........ ................................................ $600.00 Post - Production: Editing: Video Toastcr, RM-450, V0-9900 Player, VO-9850 Recorder Music Library, "Painter" Computer graphics 30 hrs @ $75 (includes operator) ............. ......... $2,250 00 ............................................................................. Titic and Closing Graphics 8 hrs C $50 (includes operator)........................................................................... $400 00 CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: USED OIL OPPORTUNITY GRANT 4W Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DISCUSSION The California Integrated Waste Management Board is currently offering a competitive opportunity grant for the development of used oil collection and public education efforts. In an effort to develop sites in our area, the Cities of Grand Terrace and Loma Linda have an opportunity to team together on a grant application to establish local collection sites in an area where there are currently no Certified Recovery Centers (CRC). Under the grant, the program will fund used oil collection containers, education/public awareness programs, advertising, assistance to CRC's, consultant costs and personnel costs. The goal will be to site a minimum of two and probably three CRC's. The program will be coordinated by Amenclean Environmental Services, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in waste management issues. They are preparing the grant and will manage the eventual implementation. There is not costs to the City for their services which would be funded entirely through the grant. The total grant request is for $97,555, of which the City of Grand Terrace will receive $14,000 to reimburse personnel costs. There is no financial cost to the City for submittal. A Resolution authorizing the grant application is required and is attached for the consideration of the City Council. FISCAL EMPACT None by this action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE C= COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A REGIONAL APPLICATION BY THE CITIES OF GRAND TERRACE AND LOMA LINDA FOR A USED OIL OPPORTUNITY GRANT ATTACHMENTS APPLICATION COVER SHEET RESOLUTION CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #3F WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Used Oil Recycling Enhancement Act that provides funds for cities, counties, and regional government entities to establish and maintain local use oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures goverrung application by cities, counties and regional authorities under the program; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with State of California for development of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Grand Terrace City Council authorizes the submittal of a regional application on behalf of the Cities of Grand Terrace and Loma Linda to the Integrated Waste Management Board for a 1994/95 Used Oil Recycling Opportunity Granv#The Assistant City Manager of the City of Grand Terrace, or their designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the above named cities all necessary applications, contracts, payments requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. The foregoing resolution was passed by the (Title of Governing Body) this the day of , 19_ Effective 1995. AS ATTESTED TO: Signed: Date: Title: ---] G:-Y s9r-- b •lF of 4, e, e, r of oE- rr7` 44PU��J'"4 4�'C4 ( r G used o c l o 4&'16 /-4*1.1'�? 6;K& ./ - CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF AGENT: WINTER STORM DAMAGE/STATE OES Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DISCUSSION With the reoccurrence of storm activity in February and March, the President declared a second disaster for California which has again made the City eligible for a reimbursement of costs for storm related maintenance and repairs. As an applicant for public assistance and reimbursement of costs through both the State of California and FEMA, cities are required to adopt a resolution designating authorized representatives to deal with each respective agency. The attached form designates both the Assistant and City Manager to represent the City in our reimbursement efforts. 4 FISCAL EWPACT None by this action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTACHED "DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION' ATTACHMENT- Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE�UNCIL AGENDA �M #� 1! CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: HAZARDOUS WASTE/MATERIALS REGULATION: UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY DESIGNATION- SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DISCUSSION: In 1993, the California legislature passed Senate Bill 1082 to reduce the regulatory burden on the business community by consolidating duplicative regulatory programs. SB 1082 mandates that the administration of six hazardous waste and materials regulatory programs be consolidated under a Unified Program Agency, and further, that the Unified Program Agency be certified by the Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency. The six specific regulatory programs consolidated under the United Program Agency are: 1. Hazardous Waste Generators 4 2. Underground Storage Tank Operation 3. Hazardous Materials Inventories & Release Response Plans 4. Acutely Hazardous Materials handling 5. Hazardous Materials Management Plans & Inventory 6. Above Ground Storage Tank Spill Prevention The County Department of Environmental Health Services is mandated to seek Unified Program certification prior to January 1, 1996. Cities may also seek certification if they are presently administering said functions. As presently exists, the City of Grand Terrace does not regulate said programs. The attached resolution designates the DEHS as the Unified Program Agency for the City of Grand Terrace. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DESIGNATING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AS THE UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT ATTACHMENTS Letter from DEHS requesting Designation Resolution CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITYCOUNCIL AGENDA REPOLWOuNC'L AGENDA ITEM # jH Page 2 Unified Program Certification 1. Hazardous Waste Generators (HSC Chapter 6.5), 2. Underground Storage Tank Operation (HSC Chapter 6.7), 3. Hazardous Materials Inventories & Release Response Plans (HSC Chapter 6.95), 4. Acutely Hazardous Materials Handling (HSC Chapter 6.95), 5. Hazardous Materials Management Plans & Inventory (Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Section 80.103(b,c), and 40 6. Aboveground Storage Tank Spill Prevention (HSC Section 25270.5). The Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) currently administers a consolidated regulatory program for hazardous waste/materials handling and related emergency planning for twenty six cities out of twenty eight cities county wide and the unincorporated areas of the County. Additionally, Assembly Bill 1777 (O'Connell), also enacted in 1993, mandates that hazardous materials inventories and management plans provided under HSC Chapter 6.95, shall be deemed to have met the requirements of UFC Section 80.103 (b,c); therefore, DEHS retains regulatory responsibility under the HSC for program components 1-5 described above. AB 1777 eliminates duplicative reporting requirements by requiring that one set of information be submitted under HSC Chapter 6.95 to DEHS. DEHS has coordinated data collection and information exchange since 1988 for the above program components 1-5, with the local fire jurisdictions and local police departments, and will continue to do so to ensure consolidated efforts. The sixth program component, the Aboveground Storage Tank Spill Prevention Plan, is administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). DEHS is working with the RWQCB to coordinate our efforts. The Aboveground Storage Tank Spill Prevention Plan Program (HSC Chapter 6.95 )and the Hazardous Materials Management Plans & Inventory (Uniform Fire Code) (UFC) Section 80.103 (b,c) could be included into the existing data collection and billing functions currently in existence with DEHS at no charge. We look forward to continuing our efforts towards regulatory streamlining which will benefit both business and the environment in the San Bernardino County region. We appreciate your consideration of our request. Should you have any questions please contact Peter Brierty, Division Chief, Hazardous Materials Management and System Support or Doug Snyder, Hazardous Materials Field Services at (909) 387-3080. PETER BRIERTY, R.E.H.S. Division Chief, Hazardous Materials Management and System Support Enclosures cc: Pamella V. Bennett, Director Doug Snyder PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, County fir of San Bernardino, State of California, this 13th day of April, 1995 by the following vote: Yes: No: Absent: m CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 00 Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX DISCUSSION Annually, the City of Grand Terrace has solicited bids and proposals for sum sweeping services within the community. With the coming of the new Fiscal Year, staff is recommending the conduct of a formal RFP Process and the development of a new contract. Staff is requesting: 1. Approval of Bid Specifications for Street Sweeping Services; and 2. Authorization to advertise and solicit proposals. This process is not being pursued based on any dissatisfaction with the current service provider (R.F. Dickson), it 4W is, simply the routine business move to test both cost and service capability of providers. The final contract approval will be presented to the City Council at the May 25, 1995 meeting. Copies of the bid document and specifications are on file with the City Clerk's Office or the Community Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT Nominal administrative costs for advertisement and admimstration of the bid process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1. APPROVE BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREE>rT SWEEPING SERVICES; AND 2. AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT AND SOLICITATION OF PROPOSALS. ATTACHMENT Bid Specifications- On file in City Clerics' Office. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #31 Community Development Department DATE: April 13, 1995 TO: City Council FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: GP-95-01 and E-95-03, An application for environmental review and General Plan Landuse Amendment to allow adult business/entertainment uses in portions of General Commercial (GC) and Industrial District (I) for consistency with the Adult Business Ordinance. LOCATION: Designated areas within Grand Terrace RECONBIENDATION: Move to adopt ordinance, Attachment A, to bring the General Plan in consistency with the recently approved Adult Business Ordinance. **************************************************** At its meeting of April 6, 1995, The Planning Commission approved General Plan Amendment GP-95-01, and respective negative declaration to allow entertainment uses in portions of The General Commercial and Industrial Districts. This was the last step necessary in the process of approval of recently adopted Adult Business Ordinance. Please refer to ordinance, and General Plan Amended Districts Map --Attachment A. The Planning Commission Report and Negative Declaration are also attached for your information --Attachment B. Respectfully Submitted, �5 Patrizia Materassi Community Development Director Attachments: A. Resolution and Map B. Planning Commission Report and Negative Declaration PM:pp c:\wp51\planning\cc\GP-95-O 1. ae COUNCILAGENDAImM# 0 22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 - (909) 824-6621 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on April 6, 1995 to review this proposed General Plan Amendment and recommended approval to the City Council of the proposed General Plan I anduse/Map Amendment (GP- 95-01) and associated Negative Declaration (E-95-03) set out in full in the attached Attachment A, B, C (Figure VI-1, Exhibit A) and D , which amend the General Plan Land Use Element, portion of the General Commercial (GC) and Industrial (1) land use categories, pages VI-9 and VI-10. WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on April 13, 4 1995 and approved GP-95-01 and E-95-03; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that by this amendment the General. Plan brings it in conformance with the Adult Business Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Proposed General Plan Land Use and Map Amendment, GP-95-01, are set out in full in Attachments A,B, C (Figure VI-1, Exhibit A) and D, are approved and adopted by the City Council. Section 2: The Negative Declaration (E-95-03) on file in the Community Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace, E-95-03, is hereby approved. Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day of its adoption. Section 4: Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5: First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 13th of April, 1995 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 27th of April, 1995. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof I:ADIIIIIi r Itlln ■ �...., ■■Ili r- - -M'-. nni oil ii ■ iL •— uilii �...on Ifni Bill, 1 �. _�•t tnnl ruelun7 �intnou'T': nnlnnnn►.�g1.���� Inla■■-■tl ■Y Wln low IIUIIIII� �t�ia■tm■J��ininnlll. ��/1 MIN tvtr' laa� - nnnma■ �mlu vunl/ :I�I�� /III Mr.;Mtr■/over • AaYI■nt■• t■O■�■I .�r■■■nn■•� nitf &M �■■urtwlo■nnunlunonll■�•,�111t1 of -pill tt■il.nunnln.uui'��'1/�� 9■11 : rlln�m■ �plLYlllMUlr II I aOallnnl■ -• ■llglinl1.11■l1l II'�l■ . nnunun �Z afasn■!1 t11 91111 : - ■ammo■■ -' nnnum n linnl mnlmn■ �� anlm_�n •� - i nitllstnl■\.�/NS1n 111aI • 71■i1i� �unrmnl■ .It11 tllnl�� ;'n �■ G Illlllt►IN MIN, �t - V- mill, : �. ■■p- 111111 HIM IW91e.1■li0 A The other item needed to complete the ordinance approval process, is a General Plan e- , amendment to allow entertamment/Adult Business uses in the Industrial District (1) and portions of the General Commerical District (GC) for consistency with the Adult Business Ordinance. Attached are those sheets of the General Plan Landuse Map and General Plan Landuse Element amended, refer to Attachments C&D. Ia:M 1 Staff feels satisfied with the ordinance as proposed and recommends the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the General Plan Landuse associated ordinance with attachments and related Negative Declaration. Prepared by, Maria C. Muett, Associate Planner Respectfully Submitted, Pat rizia Materassi, Community Development Director PM/MCM:mcm Attachments: .4. —Ordinance — B--?iegetWe D - Excerpts of General Plan to be Amended CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT M L Name of Proponent: City. of Grand Terrace to 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace CA 324-5295 Attention: -Patrizia MaterassL Planning Director, 714-824-6621 3. Date of Environmental Assessment: q-,o? D - 9S 4. Agency Requiring Assessment: CiZE of Grand Terrace �P�r'al i'a�QH+e.►�mP�il '"�MQi�D�.c�Q�ctSri..d. S. Name of Proposal, if applicable: AD a t,T' ENTLZM 1AI ME T o CarJ4^k.6' 6. Location of Proposal• cirr gjit� _ &Aftu2r'�q/.t) ra *F xVAfijP 7&V2AQ=-- 6P-45-01 a-- M Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all 'des" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will proposal result in: Yes Maybe No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of this soil? X- C. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? 1 Yes Maybe No b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change -in the amount of surface X water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? fl Alteration of the direction or X rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer cuts or excavations? �( h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? 3 Yee Maybe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X IL Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for v additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ie b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? �C C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? 5 Yes Maybe N a. Power or natural gas? A b. Communications systems? ?A C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X L Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential X hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the Proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic v !� archaeological site? %/ No more separate resources may be Yes Mae relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Environmental Ddermination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the en*Onment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Y I find that, although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a si gnificant effect in this case because the ion measures described on attached sheets have been added to the ro'ect. NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. P J I find the proposed project MAY have a significant and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ct on the environment 3 Date 9 Patrizia Materassi Planning Director Signature For City of Grand Terrace Few offices are located in Grand Terrace, and most are located in mixed commercial and office developments. A free-standing office building has been completed on the south side of Barton Road near the Gage Canal. Prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern. It is the intent of the General Plan that new commercial uses be carefully monitored. New commercial uses should relate to existing development. Isolated commercial projects as well as conversion of residential units to commercial use should be limited and prevented wherever possible. 4 The use of a Specific Plan, as previously described, is required for larger commercial developments (e.g., projects of 10 or more acres). Two commercial use categories are shown on the Land Use Policy Map. GC. General Commercial: Retail and related commercial uses, including neighborhood shopping centers. Portions of General (GQ area allow adnit b== uses as r kcmd in landm map, = 1~igare VI 1, t A. Implementation Policies: DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL USES SHALL BE ENCOURAGED. ADDITIONAL FREEWAY SERVICE -ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES SHALL BE ENCOURAGED. COMMERCIAL AREAS ALONG BARTON ROAD SHALL BE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL STUDY AND METHODS TO PREVENT 'STRIP -COMMERCIAL" TYPE DEVELOPMENT INVESTIGATED; THIS WELL REQUIRE FINANCIAL AND LEGAL COOPERATION BETWEEN LOCAL MERCHANTS, LAND OWNERS, AND THE CITY. Community Development Department DATE: April 13, 1995 TO: City Council FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (RTIP) RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND: At its meeting of June 23, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution No. 93-24, which listed 15 capital improvement projects to be part of the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTEP). The Resolution was forwarded to SANBAG and projects were all incorporated into the 1993-99 Amended Federal TIP. For your information, RTIP's are put together by sub -regional organizations and forwarded to SCAG. SCAG in its turn forwards it to the State. The State transforms it into the STIP and submits it to the Federal Government for release of funds. The RTlP and STEP are subject to air quality conformity requirements in each step of the way. This year, SANBAG is requesting us to review the previous list of projects, for inclusion on this next cycle (RTIP 1996-2002). DISCUSSION: Please note that while in the past, the RTIP list consisted of projects we wish to be funded and wanted to have a foot in the door, currently, the list should only include those projects we are really serious about pursuing, either through our gas tax, Measure I,development fee funds, and/or by grant applications. Projects to be funded by federal dollars, and regionally significant projects shall be part of the RTIP, otherwise they will not be eligible for funding. Regionally significant projects shall be included regardless of funding needs. Since the majority of the funds available to us from SANBAG programming are from ISTEA related source, the ISTEA is a federal fund, we should include all projects we would like to pursue in this list, unless we can afford them on our own. COUNCIL AGENDAREM# QjA 22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 - (909) 824-6621 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 1996-2002 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Il"ROVEMENT PLAN (RTIP) WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is located in San Bernardino County and San Bernardino County is located within the metropolitan planning boundaries of the Southern California Association of Governments; and WHEREAS, the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 requires SCAG to adopt a regional transportation improvement program for the metropolitan planning area; and WHEREAS, the 1991 ISTEA also requires that the regional transportation improvement program include a financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation improvement program can be implemented; and WHEREAS, SANBAG is the agency responsible for short-range capital and service planning and programming for the (County of San Bernardino) area within SCAG; and WHEREAS, as the responsible agency for short-range transportation planning, SANBAG is responsible for the development of the San Bernardino County Transportation Improvement Program, including all projects utilizing federal and state highway and transit funds; and WHEREAS, SANBAG must determine, on an annual basis, the total amount of funds that could be available for transportation projects within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, SANBAG will adopt the FY 1996-2002 San Bernardino County Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal years 1995/96, 1996/97 and 1997/98 for funding purposes, and will adopt the Program for fiscal years 1998/99 through 2001/02 for programming purposes and to allow environmental work on approved projects to proceed. WHEREAS, SANBAG's Transportation Improvement Program Financial Plan will identify the resources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the program. WHEREAS, SANBAG's Financial Plan, among other things certifies that the projects in the FY 1996/02 San Bernardino County Regional Transportation Improvement Program remain the highest priority for funding by the agency. WHEREAS, SANBAG has distributed RTIP guidelines and requested City's list of projects by May 1, 1995. Attachment A I, BRENDA STANFILL, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 13th day of April, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 4 ABSENT: no ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper, City Attorney c:\wp51\planning\cc\r ip95.res City Clerk c I PAGE 846 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DATE- 12/20/94 1993-1999 AMENDED FEDERAL TIP PRIORITIES BY YEAR LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM (INCLUDES AMENDMENT #01) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY •• GRAND TERRACE •• SOURCE_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE TO 92/93 93/g4 94/95 95/96 90/97 97/98 98/99 RCH-MPO D1ST-PPNO MOOEL (E1.000) AGENCY N FUND PROG CODE FA RTIP COMMENTS AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT B ELEMENT-YR ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS LAST UPDATF: 08 06/92—�— R'fIP COMMERCE WAY TOTAL COST S1t43 ADD-SGAG AT IOWA 0[I-31863 07330 NEW CONNECTION TO IOWA/I-215 LOCAL HE11 INTERCHANGE E 42 R 67 C 274 ND t2/95 AA 12/04 T 383 - Y Y XSBO E R C T 83 133 544 ?6C1 LAST UPDATE: 08 08 93- RTIP COMMERCE WAY 70TAL COST $3550 8 AOD-SCAG MICHIGAN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET 08-31862 07330 CONSTRUCT 4 LAME ROAD LOCAL HE14 E 138 -' R 2032 C 1:380 - ND 12/95 AA 12/02 T 3550 n T Y f PAGF. 845 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DATE: 12/20/04 1993-1090 AMENDED FEDERAL TIP PRIORITIES BY YEAR LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM (INCLUDES AMENDMENT 001) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ** GRANO TERRACE •• SOURCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE ID 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 RCH-MPO DIST-PPNO MODEL (S1,000) AGENCY d FUND PROG CODE EA RTIP COMMENTS AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT M ELEMENT-YR ENVIRONMENTAL S-ATUS LAST UPDATE: 08 06 93 RTIP BARTON ROAD TOTAI COST S180 ADD-SCAG AT SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD 08-31804 07330 WIDEN OVERCROSSINO LOCAL HE11D FROM 2 TO 4 LANES E 20 (20% GRAND TERRACE. 75% COLTON) R (T/5 / ) C 160 NO 12/9494 A0. 12/99 t 180 �!! - LAST UPDATE: 01/31/94 RTIP BARTON ROAD TOTAL COST $558 ADD-SCAG HONEY HILLS TO N.E. CITY LIMITS D8-31859 4350 07330 WIDEN FROM 2 TO 4 LANES LOCAL HE13 E 53 R ` C 505 ;. NU t2/94 AA 12/95 T 558 Y LAST UPDATE: 01 31/94 RTIP BAR70N ROAD TOTAL COST $197 ADD-SCAG 22430 BARTON ROAD (WEST OF I-215) 08-31853 4360 07330 CONST. 48 VEHICLE PARK 8 RIDE LOT LOCAL " HB6A E 20 n R NO 12/93 AA 12/94 T 18 v: .. X PAGE 849 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COVERN14ENTS DATE: 12/20/94 1993- 1999 AIIENDEO FEDERAL TIP PRIORITIES BY YEAR LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM (14CLUOES AMENDMENT" 901) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY •* GRAND TERRACE +• SOURCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE ID 92/03 93/94 94/9b 95/96 96/97 97/08 98/90 RCH-MPO O1ST-PPNO MODEL M.000) AGENCY M FUND PROG CODE EA RTIP COMMENTS AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT M ELEMENT-YR ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS LAST UPDATE: OB 05/93 r -� RTIP VARIOUS LOCATIONS - LUMP SUM TOTAL COST $800 ADD-SCAG OB-03127S 07330 MINOR PROJECTS MA22 n 0 LTF E R C 200 200 200 200 T 200 200 200 200 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS 1"6 Through 2002 Regional Mransportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Materalsefephone: (909) 824-6621 Agency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fax#: (909) 784-7629 i0 1 Route or Street: Barton Road RTR #: $0 1 Project Umits., (Post Miles if on State R;glIZy) I-215 Overpass on Barton Road DescriFtion of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many lanes add4(If widening shoulder -how many ti., rehibilitatimNof what) (If project is "regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTII' Guidelines Widening of Barton Road and I-215 overpass to provide for ad itional two lanes of traffic. The exisiting conditions is one lane each direction, an4 are left turn pockets to freeway on -ramps. This will provide less congest: at that location improving If this UrQied is being amended. nle= Jig: RIV # 31850 Which RTIP is project currently in (Le. 93-99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendment (what is being d =ged in this project) (from old to new), - Expected Completion Date of Project? M M N C E EIEMMAW =HOOI SF' \�\ S _ V co -/ W Q In SA-N BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GO 1996 Through 2002 t " Regional !L)mnsportation Improvement_ Program Submittal Form Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Materassi Telephone: p (909) 824=6621 ency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fax #; (909) 783-7629 hMiect DescriDfioU _ RMW #: Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, A�101)One) Route or Street: Barton Road $oied amitc: (Post Mies if on 4tatP u:g Intersection of Barton Road and Michigan Ave. DeSaipt. • (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how mauy &V r ubUitation-of what) (If project is "regionally sigm cant" refer to Pg. 18.919 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines) Improvements to intersection. Acquire additional ROW for ultimate width of 44' half street from current 3' Malt street, widening the Intersection—. Project will complete the 128' of existing southernly bound lane through th, intersection. Total number of lanes at intersection will be 4; 2 lanes northerly, and 2 lanes southernly.. This will provide for greater capacity, eliminate delays and provide for proper turning movements. If this ptQject is bdugamrnded, VIC= list RTR # 31851 Which RTJP is project currently in (* e. 93-99. etc.) 93-99 4W Description of (what is being d =9ed in this project) (from old to new): No rhangAR needed for project description lrtl c_Y ' Expected Completion Date of Project? 2 P r� ``� E Sc SS �` 0 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNAIENIS 1"6 Through 2002 Regional Transportafion lImprovement.Program, Submittal Form Agency: City of Grand Terrace ContaCL.Patrizia ters AgencyCode: Date: ARMaasi —ril 7 -,f IM UXITJI.-f rt &-7 Barton Road Telephonm (909) 824-6621 Fax #.- (909) 783-7629 EMiect Limits: (Bwt Mies if on Stgte lEgIlMy) 22430 Barton Road (between Road and Britton Way) Description of EMjed-, (detailWLe. how many Imes currently east and how many Imes added)(H widaft dodder -how n=V M. rdubilitaflon-of what) (If project is 'regionally signific ant! refer to Pg. 189 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines) Develop a Park and Ride facility for 48 spaces and portion for mixed use. Project includes landscaping, irrigation, lighting, grading, drainage and . I fencing at Barton Road and Britton Way. I If this Filed ii bein I)rQjg amended. VJC= I RTJF# -u-au Which RUP is project currentjy in (L-e .93-99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendment (what is being danged in this project) (from old to new): VI-01 "N 0-Mo 365MMUT-774M Expected Completion Date of Project? V A , I'!,'E i R I i I ', S! L T' L r.,M SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNAMM 1996 Through 2002 Regional Z)ramportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form ��,. City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621 Materassi Agency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fag #: (909) 783-7629 ' 1 LY 1 I✓ POND t DI D+t 1 111+ 11 .1 0 !To� Y L I, Route or Street: Barton Road at La Crosse Ave. Project Limits: (Post Miles if on State IffigilyEW SW corner of Barton Road and La Crosse at 215 Interchange. Description of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently east and how many lanes added)(If widening shouldc�how many ft., rebabilitadon-of what) (If project is `regionally scant" refer to Pg. 18,19 & 20 of the RIV Guidelines) Develop a Park and Ride facility for approximately 60 spaces. Project inc] tion, lighting, grading, drainage, paving, fencing and ts. If this project is being amended, nlem list RTIp # 31854 Which RT1P is project airrently in (Le. 93_99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendment (what is being dianged in this project) (from old to new): Expected Completion Date of Project? ion. R 3 2 - CPMD �j� EIMMACE SCHOM M = . a j W 1 � M 4!� OR. 1Ti ;1TY SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVF + 1"6 Through 2002 ; Regional Transportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form Agency.- City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia si Agency Code: Date: Materas Anti 1 5Inc,. w 7' i 1: , Mt. Vernon Ave. RTW #: Telephone.. (909) 824-6621 Fax.#: (909) 783-7629 Project Limits: (Post Mies if on State Highway) Mt. Vernon Ave. (Barton Road to Main St. D=dption of Project: (detailed-i.e. how mmw lanes currently exist and how many Imes addeM(If widening shoulder -how many fL, rehabilitation -of what) (If project is `regionally significant" rder to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines) Prepare Mt. Vernon Ave for.bicycle lanes and pedestrian facilities. Projec will complete the widening to two lanes of those portions which are still restricted to a single lane through traffic. According to City of Grand Te General Plan, Mt. Vernon is to have a consistent 88' ROW from Main to Bart, Road: H this project is bcing amended, nlleease list RTIP # 31856 Which RT]P is project currently in (Le. 93-99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendment (what is being .d=ged in this project) (from old to new): No changes needed -for project description. Expected Completion Date of Project? i •+�I a M ill —i �_��� it . � P— BIZ-_.•. �I:i •~ �� _ - EMS HHE SHit I~ a �wua . 11� ' ■ -s � i�,ye no .. --fib-. 111111 lips. � .•�::._- -. =' - • :: � 1. '�,�,q'��.•- I " � - • - � -= 00 - is rZC .... Ran , e SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVE NAMM 1996 Through 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form Agency City of Grand Terrace Coact. Patrizia Materassi Telephone: (909) 824-6621 ency Code: Date: April 7. 1995 Fax 0 783-7629 $eject Description _ RTIP #: Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, � One) Main Street Mt. Vernon Ave to westerly City limits (north side of street) Desgiption of Project: (detailedLe. how many lanes currently exist and how many lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many f.,11mabilitatiion-of what) (If project is "regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RIV Guidelines) Installation of pedestrian --and bicycle facilities. Proiect includes ROW acquisition, street improvements, wall painting, landscaping and striping. If this project is being amended, please list: RTM # 31860 Which RM is project cu ready in (Lie. 93-99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Ammdmeut (what is bang dianged in this project) (from old to new): No change needed for project --description. Expected Completion Date of Project? SAN BERNA,RDINO ASSOCIATED GOVER1 A11KNTS 1996 Through 2002 Regional Zransportation Improvement.Prograin Submittal Form n Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contacffatrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621 en Code: Date: ria JCL E55.L Fax #: (90 -7629 PcQject Description _ RTIP #: 7s Project being -ADDED, DELE1"ED, or AMENDED One) Route or Street: Michigan Ave. Emiect�amitc: (Post Miles if on State Rigs Michigan Ave. (Barton Road to an TurenT D� tion of Project: (detailed -Le, how many lanes currently east and how many lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many ft., rdiabWastion-of what) Of project is "regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTII' Guidelines) Proposed to provide for ultimate improvement by completing portions nf on lane where restrictions exist southbound and an addition of one lane northbound. Total of two lanes improved each direction, one lane northerl and one lane southerly. If this project is being amended, please list; RTIP # 31861 Which RTV is project currently in (- e. 93_99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendmart (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new): Project_ description not changed. Project limits changed from DeBerry to Van -Buren. Project total cost has been changed. RTIP 93-99 combined two projects which totalled $2,076,000. EJ�oiect Part of an Approved Congedion Mang y [4 yes [ ] No Expected Completion Date of Project? ' / rtBARYON t • -BIRSP M t., -.-\ CITY � _�. r u. I - 7m,'14 :I LIMITS f :L 1 R1 ' - i- CM 4.1_ =t T- , r, - M2 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS 1"6 Through 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement. Program Submittal Form Agency: City of Grand Terrace Cone; Patrizia Telephone: (9109) 824-6621 95 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS 1"6 Through 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement. Program Submittal Form AgenC,: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621 Materassi Code: Date (909) 783-7629 en - : Fax #: Project Description _ RTIP #: Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, (aMe Oue) Route or Street: Barton Road EQject amitc: (Post Miles if on State Aighwavl Barton Road at Souther Pacific Rail Road. Description of Project: (detailed -Le. how many lanes currently exist and how many lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many M, rehabilitsiion of what) (If project is `regionally Ogni�" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the R11P Guidelines) Proposal would replace an old two lane truss bridge over S.P.R.R. on Barton Road with a four lane facility as per General Plan Circulation Element. Coordination with Colton required. Shared allotment proportion is 75Z Colton and 25% Grand Terrace of total costs. If this prQject is being amended, plem list : RTIP # 31864 4 Which RTIP is project Currently in (* e. 93-99, etc.) 93-99 Description of Amendment (what is being &anged in this project) (from old to new): Nn r1inngac rn prnaPrr AParri�n inn_ Changes made to project total. e rll �_Y �' � 1 1 : 1 1 �1 L-1. .1 1 ►.7. 1 1 \/ 1 �11 tit 7 �11 1 Expected Completion Date of Project? CITY ( w•«• u__. \ N LIMITS i '' I 1 Community Development Department TO: City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City of Grand Terrace continue support of the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan by moving to approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and directing the City Mayor to sign the document. BACKGROUND: The City of Grand Terrace passed a resolution in September of 1994 in support of the preparation of the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The purpose of this report is to respond to the final Draft Memorandum of Understanding received in march 1995 from the County of San Bernardino. SUMMARY OF PLAN: The Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan is designed to protect endangered species (both presently listed and those to be listed in the future), as well as preserve a habitat for these species in the San Bernardino Valley. To achieve this goal, a biological database will be created which will analyze all areas encompassed in its scope to determine the type and number of species affected. In addition, a location will be chosen as a predetermined site for habitat conservation and species protection. Developers will then be assessed a fee which will be used to maintain the protected habitat. Administrative costs of the project will be funded primarily through grants. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 613`-- 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE FIFTEEN AFFECTED CITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND ADDITIONAL UNDERSIGNED PARTICIPATING AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY. This Memorandum of Understanding (Memorandum) is made and entered into as of the date 4W of signature by and among the County of San Bernardino and the undersigned cities, state and federal agencies and other participating local agencies. The signatories collectively are referred to as the "Participating Agencies." The Participating Agencies for the purposes of this Memorandum are those that have local land use authority, are self-governing local agencies or are state or federal agencies with land management authority and/or jurisdiction over plant and animal species and natural habitats which are the subject of the Habitat Conservation Plan. WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies are among the local governments, self-governing agencies, and state and federal agencies that have administrative responsibility or regulatory authority over lands within the planning area that are subject to Federal and State statutes including the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended, the California Endangered Species Act of 1984 (CESA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the Federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, state planning and zoning laws, and local ordinances, and, WHEREAS, these statutes direct the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service") and the California Department of Fish and Game ("Department's to conserve, protect, and enhance plant, fish, and wildlife species and their habitats from adverse effects resulting from public and private development and actions, and, WHEREAS, the various statutes and sources of authority under which the Participating Agencies function do not empower any individual agency to implement a comprehensive, multi -agency program for long-term viability of species of concern, and, WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies recognize the need for comprehensive and coordinated protection of species of concern, and the need to integrate their responsibilities and authorities in a coordinated manner to ensure successful, timely, and mutually beneficial resolution of issues involving species of concern, and, WHEREAS, the state and federal agencies participating in this Memorandum will ensure that their regulatory decisions and land use practices will comply with state and federal environmental and endangered species statutes and regulations and that their management actions will promote appropriate use and protection of sensitive biological areas under their jurisdictions, and, DRAFT - 3/15/95 4.00 PM 1 2.2 Provide Eau4 in Regulation. To provide a comprehensive means to coordinate and standardize mitigation and compensation requirements so that public and private actions will be regulated equally and consistently, reducing delays, expenses, and regulatory duplication. It is intended that the plan will eliminate uncertainty in developing private projects and will prescribe a system to ensure that the costs of compensation and mitigation are applied equitably to all. 2.3 Reduce Cumulative Effects. To prescribe mitigation measures for private development and agency actions to lessen or avoid cumulative impacts to the covered species and eliminate, whenever possible, case -by -case review of impacts of projects when consistent with the mitigation and compensation requirements prescribed by the plan. 2.4 Incidental Take Permit. To obtain the necessary permits or take authorizations from the Service and the Department to authorize the incidental take of listed species covered in the plan in connection with otherwise lawful activities within the area subject to the plan as provided by Section 10(a) of the ESA and Section 2081 of the CESA. 2.5 Conservation (Pre4istin9)- Agreements. The MSHCP is intended to provide for the long term preservation of covered species not currently listed as threatened or endangered pursuant to the ESA or CESA such that should they become listed, the Department and the Service shall, barring "unforeseen or extraordinary" conditions, authorize incidental take for the species. To accomplish this, all non -listed species being considered under this plan will be treated as if they are already listed. "Unforeseen or extraordinary" conditions shall be defined in the MSHCP and its Implementing Agreement, but such conditions, for the purposes of this MOU, are generally understood to be: (1) environmental, demographic and/or genetic stochastic circumstances that were not and could not be anticipated during the preparation of the Plan, or (2) information developed during MSHCP implementation monitoring that identifies consequences of MSHCP implementation procedures that may jeopardized the continued existence of the species. 2.6 Provide Oversight Control Measures and Standards of Success. To establish a means in which the MSHCP will provide appropriate and successful methods of: (1) reporting; (2) accounting audits; (3) funding (short and long term); (4) periodic and independent biological evaluation; and (5) opportunities for adequate public participation. 3.1 The Plan. The principal component of this effort is the preparation of a MSHCP. The plan will adopt and adhere to the best available information on or methods of conservation biology and identify listed and unlisted species to be covered in the plan. It will seek to minimize the threats that would lead to listing of presently unlisted species covered in the plan and identify a reserve system, financing and' management which are sufficient to conserve the covered species. The plan will include the development and analysis of appropriate biological data, an alternatives DRAFT - 3/15/95 4 00 PM 3 3.4 CEQA AND NEPA Compliance. Concurrent with preparation and release of the draft and final plans, a joint environmental review document will be prepared and released which will satisfy Federal and State requirements. 3.5 Decision. The acceptance of the plan, the CEQA and NEPA environmental documents and the Section 10(a) permit applications and the signing of an Implementation Agreement by the Service will result in the issuance of Section 10(a) permits, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the ESA, to the local agencies that are participants in the planning effort for the public and private lands involved. The acceptance of the plan and the CEQA environmental documentation and the signing of an Implementation Agreement by the Department will result in the issuance of 2081 take authorizations for the covered species that are adequately protected by the plan pursuant to the CESA to local agencies that are participants in the plan for the public and private lands involved. Other appropriate decision documents will be issued by the Participating Agencies. 3.6 Implementation. Following or concurrent with the issuance of the biological opinion, adoption of the plan, and receipt of the 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations, the signatories will revise their land use plans and policies to conform with the plan and the 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or withdraw from the program. Take authorizations may not be in effect until land use plans are amended. Should any participant withdraw from the program, it may adversely affect the plan area and covered species list and therefore may require appropriate modifications of the plan. The signatories will also ensure that future plans, policies, and actions will be in conformance with the plan and the Section 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations. Should the need arise to amend the plan in accordance with established procedures due to new information or the development of more effective management prescriptions or techniques,'such amendment will occur through a cooperative effort involving the agencies and the public in the southwestern San Bernardino County that are subject to 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or biological opinions that may have already been issued. 3.7 Conservation Strategy. The plan shall maximize the use of appropriate publicly -owned lands, comply with legally mandated conservation measures, and provide incentives for conservation of private lands (land acquisition, density transfers, land swaps, tax incentives, mitigation banks, etc.). 3.8 Implementation Funding. The scope of the plan and any preserve system must take into account realistic, affordable funding sources. The plan shall be based upon tangible and affordable sources of funds and may provide for increased conservation if other local, state or federal funding becomes available. DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 5 Foundation, and other State and Federal funds such as those established by the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, the Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Traffic Management Environmental Enhancement (TMEE) program and Land and Water Conservation Fund program. The Participating Agencies will also provide a fair share contribution to funding the plan preparation and implementation by allocating appropriate staff and support services. 4.5 Proposed Schedule. Signatories acknowledge that time is of the essence and hereby agree to make their best efforts to complete and obtain final approval of the plan by a target date of June 30, 1996. A timeline setting forth specific dates for the completion of each identified task necessary to complete the plan is contained in Attachment D. 4.6 Environmental Compliance. In recognition of the goal of achieving the timely preparation and approval of the plan, all Participating Agencies hereby agree that they will submit any and all comments on the appropriate environmental documentation on a timely basis, unless otherwise provided by law. 1 ; • • 1■ 1:11*91111 ►IVA The County of San Bernardino agrees to provide the following resources and to perform the following functions according to the funding mechanisms agreed to by the cities, local agencies, county and other interested parties: 5.1 Lead Agency Act as lead agency for the plan. As lead agency, the County will aw provide overall leadership and coordination among the Participating Agencies in the development of this plan. This includes functioning as Local Lead Agency in complying with the CEQA in conjunction with the Department and coordinating NEPA compliance in coordination with the Service. 5.2 Planning Team Personnel. Provide the primary members of the planning team 5.3 Facilities Equipment. and Super. Provide office facilities to house the planning team and provide necessary support such as office machine supplies, etc. The County also agrees to provide automated support, such as word processing and geographic information system products directly or through contracts. 5.4 Data. Provide any relevant data in its possession for the use of the planning team and the Participating Agencies and secure additional data on public lands as needed to allow completion of the plan and encourage private landowner participation. The County also agrees to participate in the analysis of the data and formulation of management prescriptions. 5.5 Public Participation. Assume lead responsibilities for ensuring adequate public participation by affected parties and interests and actively seek overall public participation in the planning effort. DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 7 authorization contained in Section 10(a)(2)(B) of the ESA and Section 2081 of the Public Resources Code for those species through the establishment of a preserve system that conserves adequate habitat and provides for the retention and management of such preserves in perpetuity. The Service and the Department also agree to provide for expedited issuance of Section 10(a) permits and 2081 authorizations for Covered Species not currently listed pursuant to the ESA or CESA in the event that a non -listed covered species is listed in the future. 6.4 Assurances to Plan Participants. The approved plan shall provide assurances to Participating Agencies and landowners that if the plan is implemented as proposed, no additional land or financial compensation will be sought from them without their consent if "unforeseen" or "extraordinary" circumstances should arise with respect to rr either listed or unlisted species that are covered by the properly functioning plan. It is understood that species not covered by the plan will not be afforded the same assurances as those that are covered. However, in the event that a species not addressed in the MSHCP is listed at some future date, the Service and the Department agree to use the MSHCP as a forum for addressing the conservation needs of the species as required by the ESA and CESA in the same manner that Covered Species have been addressed. All Participating Agencies will make every attempt at accommodating the conservation requirements of the newly listed species within the existing conservation strategies and preserves of the MSHCP. 7.1 Good Faith. This Memorandum is entered into freely and in good faith by the signatory agencies. Each agency affirms that execution of this document is within its legal purview and agrees to fulfill the role slated herein and any other tasks and responsibilities incumbent upon Participating Agencies. All of the Participating Agencies by signature to this Memorandum agree to diligently pursue completion of the subject MSHCP and endorse consensus decisions of the Steering Committee as long as the proposed actions are within the statutory and regulatory ability of their respective agency. 7.2 Interim Project Reviews and Approvals. All Participating Agencies recognize that planning efforts undertaken pursuant to this Memorandum can be prolonged beyond anticipated planning schedules due to various unforeseen circumstances. All parties agree that interim land use actions shall be considered on a case by case basis within the purview of each agencies' individual jurisdiction and in compliance with existing laws and regulations. The MSHCP planning effort shall not be cause to create a "de facto" moratorium for on -going, otherwise legally adequate programs and activities. All permit applications processed during the period of the MSHCP development will be evaluated on their individual merits and in consideration of cumulative impacts to the species and their habitat. Appropriate incentives to land holders for the protection on non -listed species may be achieved through consideration of density transfers, land swaps within the MSHCP area, "Debt for Nature" exchanges, tax incentives through gifts, donations and conservation easements, mitigation banks and purchase of affected property. DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 9 By Date Chair, San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors San Bernardino, California By Date Mayor, City of Chino Chino, California Mayor, City of Chino Hills Chino Hills, California By Mayor, City of Colton Colton, California By 4 QI Mayor, City of Fontana Fontana, California Mayor, City of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace, California Mayor, City of Highland Highland, California Mayor, City of Loma Linda Loma Linda, California DRAFT - 3/15/95 4-00 PM 11 Date Date Date Date Date Date ATTACHMENT A BOUNDARIES OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN The Habitat Conservation Plan for the San Bernardino Valley will encompass the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San AW Bernardino National Forest Boundary on the north and east. A-1 Status Species Federal State Coast homed lizard FC2/FSS CSC Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei San Bernardino ring-necked snake FC2/FSS piadoph . punctat Ms modestus fir Coastal rosy boa FC2/FSS Lichanura trivimata rosafusca Coast patch -nosed snake FC2/FSS CSC Salvadora hexalipis virquftea Two -striped garter snake FC2/FSS Thamnoplija hammondii Birds White-tailed kite CFP Elanus Leucurus 4 Northern harrier CFP Circus Wneus Sharp -shinned hawk FSS CSC Acci ip ter striatus Cooper's Hawk Acci iter coope�j� FSS CSC Ferruginous hawk FC2 CSC Buteo regalis Golden eagle Aquila ch[ysaetos canadensis CSC American peregrine falcon FE SE Falco peregrinatus Prairie falcon FSS CSC Falco mexicanus IN Species Status Federal State San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit FC2 CSC Lepus califomicus bennettii Los Angeles pocket mouse Perognathus longimembris brevinasus FC2 CSC San Diego pocket mouse FC2 CSC Chaetodi{Lus fallax fallax San Bernardino kangroo rat Dipodommemami parvus FC2 CSC Southern grasshopper mouse Onychomvs torridus ramona FC2 CSC San Diego desert woodrat FC2 CSC Neotoma le ida intermedia Status Family Species Federal State CNPS Many -stemmed dudleyea Dudleya multicaulis CRS FC2/FSS Santa Ana River woollystar Eriastrum densifolium sanctorum PLM FE SE Hot Spring fimbristylis Fimbris lis thermalis CYP FC3B 2 California bedstraw Galium califomicum primum RUB FC2 SR 1113 Los Angeles sunflower Heliathus nuttallii parishii AST FC2 1A Smooth tarplant AST FC2 1 B Hemizonia puupgens laevis Southern California black walnut JUG 4 Juglans califomica californica Coulter's goldenfields Lasthenia glabrata coulted AST FC2 113 Robinson's peppergrass Le idium virginicum robinsonii BRA 1 B Ocellated Humbolt lily LIL FC2 4 Lilium humboldtii ocellatum Parish's desert-thom Lycium parishii SOL 2 Parish's bush mallow MLV FC2 1A Malacothamnus prishii Pringle's monardella LAM FC2 1A Monardella Drinalei California spineflower PLG 4 Mucronea californica m ATTACHMENT C LIST OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES AND POINT OF CONTACT San Bernardino County Planning Department Randy Scott, Planning Manager 385 N. Arrowhead Ave., Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 (909) 387-4146 (909) 387-3223 (FAX) Citv of Chino Community Development Department Jerry Blum, City Planner 13220 Central Avenue Chino, CA 91708 (909) 591-9812 Ext. 520 (909) 591-6829 (FAX) City of Chino Hills Community Development Department Eric Norris, Senior Planner 2001 Grand Avenue Chino Hills, CA 91709-4869 (909) 590-1511 Ext. 223 (909) 590-5646 (FAX) &' of Colton Public Works Department John C. Hutton, Director 650 North La Cadena Drive Colton, CA 92324-2893 (909) 370-5065 (909) 370-5154 (FAX) City of Fontana Planning Division Dennis Woods, Associate Planner 8353 Siena Avenue Fontana, CA 92334 (909) 350-6724 (909) 350-7691(FAX) City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 (909) 824-6621 (909) 783-7629 (FAX) C-1 City of Highland Planning Department Steve Walker, City Planner 26985 East Base Line Avenue Highland, CA 92346 (909) 864-6861 Ext. 215 (909) 862-3180 (FAX) City of Loma Linda Planning Department Dan Smith, Director of Community Development 25541 Barton Road Loma Linda, CA 92354 (909) 799-2810 (909) 799-2890 (FAX) City of Montclair Community Development Department Rob Clark, Community Development Director 5111 Benito Street Montclair, CA 91763-0808 (909) 625-9431 (909) 621-1584 (FAX) City of Ontario Planning Department Otto Kroutil, City Planner 303 East "B" Street, Civic Center Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 391-2506 (909) 391-0692 (FAX) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Scott Murphy, Associate Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-1851 (909) 948-1648 (FAX) City of Redlands Planning Department Jeff Shaw, Planning Director 30 Cajon Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 798-7555 (909) 798-7503 (FAX) ATTACHMENT D San Bernardino Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan Plan Preparation Outline 1. Interagency Coordination and Plan Development Agreements U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Department of Fish and Game Cities Local agencies, utilities and environmental groups Local business 2. Biological and Land Ownership Database Assembly Aerial photography Data automation Field verification Wildlife component Vegetative component Map assembly (GIS) 3. Plan Preparation 4. Environmental Compliance 5. Programmatic Permit Preparation and Implementation Agreement 6. Plan Adoption Tentative Schedule 3 months 9 months 6 months 6 months 3 months 1 month i MID 1 VU0 Tasks Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May Jun I Jul I AugSe Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan__l Feb I Mar I Apr I May Jun Interagency Coordination Database Assembly Plan Preparation Environmental Compliance Programmatic Permit Preparation Plan Adoption D-1 ATTACHMENT F INTERIM PROJECT REVIEW GUIDELINES This document establishes an agreement among the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service"), the California Department of Fish and Game ("Department") and all other federal, state and local agencies participating in the San Bernardino Valley Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) pertaining to an Interim Project Review Process to be utilized during the preparation of the Plan. The Interim Project Review Guidelines (IPRG) have two related purposes: (1) to ensure early review and consideration of proposed projects by the Service and the Department so that projects which could preclude the successful development of the MSHCP will be identified at the earliest possible point in the development review process, and (2) to provide a opportunity for dialogue between the lead agency, the project applicant and the regulatory agencies to explore alternatives or mitigation measures which could minimize and mitigate potential project impacts. Local Agencies have identified that significant problems have arisen in the past when comments on proposed projects are not received from the Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service until very late in the lead agency's decision - making process. To address this problem with respect to projects which may have the potential to preclude long-term conservation strategies addressed in the MSHCP or impact the viability of biological resources, the Service and the Department are committing to meet with the appropriate project proponent at the earliest feasible point. Early identification of potential impacts will assist in the preparation of environmental documents for the project and provide the opportunity to identify potential project alternatives and mitigation measures for consideration in compliance with Public Resources § 21080.3(a). The IPRG specifically does not create an additional layer of project review nor to confer any additional authority on the Department, the Service or lead agency. The recommendations of the Service and Department are advisory; the final decision of whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency pursuant to existing laws. A. Guidelines for Projects to Be Included in the Review Process Each lead agency and/or project proponent shall determine whether a project should be reviewed pursuant to the IPRG. Generally, the lead agency or project proponent may consider that a project as defined by CEQA § 21065, except those projects statutory or categorically exempt from CEQA, located within the sensitive habitat areas of the MSHCP boundaries, has the potential to preclude long term preservation planning or impact the viability of biological resources, and it is appropriate to utilize the IPRG. The lead agency retains the discretion to determine that a project within the plan area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning. F-1 C. PROCEDURES 1. At least three weeks prior to the desired IPRG meeting date the Planning Director/designee or project proponent shall notify the Service and the department and the MSHCP contact person in writing of any project(s) which the lead agency or project proponent wishes to have reviewed at the IPRG meeting. For each project , the lead agency/project proponent will transmit two copies of each of the following: • a location map on a 7.5' quad sheet identifying the project site • a site plan or other illustration depicting the project as proposed • the project application or other summary sheet identifying existing general plan designation and zoning, and any proposed changes; existing land use on the site; and the type and intensity of land use proposed. • the Initial Study or Environmental Assessment and a biological resource survey if one has been prepared; if one has not been prepared then a description of the site including vegetation, presence of a floodplain, blueline stream, or other environmental resource, hazard or constraint, and a list of sensitive species which have the potential to occur on site. • Any other information deemed pertinent by the lead agency. 2. The lead agency or project proponent shall be responsible for notifying the other party of the date, time, and location of the IPRG review meeting, if the attendance of the project applicant is desired. 3. At the review meeting, the lead agency, project proponent, the Service and the 4W Department will have the opportunity to discuss the project, answer questions, etc. A representative from an adjacent jurisdiction which may be affected by the proposed project may also attend the meeting at that jurisdiction's discretion. At the review meeting if possible, otherwise in not more than 30 days after the review meeting, the Service and the Department representatives shall provide the following information to the lead agency and the project applicant: • A statement as to whether, in the agency's opinion: — The project will not preclude long term conservation planning or adversely impact the viability of a species. — The project has the potential to preclude long term conservation planning or adversely impact the viability of a species and additional studies on specific species may be necessary, and project alternatives and/or mitigation measures need to be assessed in the environmental review process. 4. A project may be scheduled for an additional IPRG meeting at an appropriate date if there is a need for the Service or the Department to respond to a Draft Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration. F-3 CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Recommendation: FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX SUNyIARY: With the implementation of the California Integrated Waste Act (AB939), a number of key issues within both the law, as well as, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element are in need of address by the City. The two key issues are: 1. Review and revision of the City's Municipal Code in regards to solid waste and garbage; 2. Commercial Solid Waste programs, regulation and franchising, Staff is requesting that the Council provide authorization for staff to begin the implementation of an aggressive integrated waste management program within the City of Grand Terrace. DISCUSSION: In January, 1995, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element, Household Hazardous Waste Element and Non -Disposal Facilities Element were approved by the Integrated Waste Management Board for implementation. With this approval, staff is now seeking authorization from the City Council to begin the implementation of these documents in two key areas; revision of the municipal code and the development of a commercial solid waste program. Municipal Code Update: Under AB 939, the scope of garbage (trash) shifted from the simple idea of removing waste from a community to the concept of Integrated Waste Management. This included a shift from the simple regulation of customer service, rate regulation and preservation of the public's availability to guaranteed service, to a program which now requires inventorying of waste, recycling and mandated diversion goals, which if not met, carry potentially high penalties to the local agency. The existing Municipal Code Section does not address many of the key concepts of Integrated Waste Management, and is thus in need of a comprehensive revision. A number of issues are required to be included into the Code include: • Recycling • Definitions of Recyclable Waste Matter • Revisions to Government Code reference and regulations • Integrated Waste Management • Diversion CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPOR7COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT APRIL 13,1995 PAGE 3 2. Authorize the development and implementation of a Commercial Solid Waste Permit Agreement for a period ending in the year 2000. 3. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of commercial solid waste recycling programs. These actions will begin a process by which the City will gain leverage in achieving both diversion goals, as well as an increased control of commercial hauling within the City. As proposed, staff does not foresee any adverse impacts to either existing haulers or the business community. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize as follows: 4 1. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of a comprehensive revision to the City's Municipal Code Section 5.42 relating to Garbage and Refuse. 2. Issue all commercial haulers the required five (5) year termination notice (Public Resources Code 49520) for solid waste services within the City of Grand Terrace. 3. Authorize the development and implementation of a Commercial Solid Waste Permit Agreement for a period ending in the year 2000. 4. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of commercial solid waste recycling programs. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MARCH 28, 1995 CRA ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. STUFF REPORT COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT REQUEST TO SCHEDULE BUDGET HEARING DATES FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996 BUDGET FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED yy City staff is in the process of preparing the 1995/96 preliminary budget. The budget will be distributed to the City Council on or about May 17, 1995. The Council is requested to designate two evenings for budget hearing sessions. Staff recommends that Council consider dates between the week of May 22 through June 2, 1995, for these sessions. A calendar has been included for your convenience. 4W Our goal is to pass a budget at the 1st Council Meeting in June (6/8/95). COUNCIL AG@EIDA ITEM # 9-D June 1995 Monthly Planner •.r r• •.r �- •.r rr-• • roili •.r •.r •.r 1 2 3 3 M T W T P s 1 2 3 4 3 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 1♦ 13 16 17 (! l9 20 21 22 23 21 23 26 27 22 29 30 31 I 2 3 4 3 6 7 t 9 10 11 12 13 14 11 16 17 li 19 20 21 22 23 3. 23 26 27 2# 29 30 31 m 4 5 -- 6 7 8 9 10 :00 PM COUNCIL MEETING 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6:00 PM COUNCIL MEETING 25 26 27 28 29 30 Printed by Instant Calendar on 4/6/95