04/13/1995FILE COPY
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
California 92313-5295
Civic Center
(909) 824-6621
Fax (909) 783-7629
Fax (909)783-2600
Byron R. Matteson
Mayor
Gene Carlstrom
Mayor Pro Tempore
Herman Hilkey
Jim Singley
Dan Buchanan
Council Members
Thomas J. Schwab
City Manager
April 13, 1995
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Regular Meetings
2nd and 4th Thursday - 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 13, 1995
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 P.M.
22795 Barton Road
* Call to Order -
* Invocation - Pastor Roger Greenwalt, First Baptist Church of Grand Terrace
* Pledge of Allegiance -
* Roll Call -
AGENDA ITEMS
STAFF
COUNCII.
RECOMMENDATIONS
ACTION
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Approve
1. Approval of 03/23/95 Minutes
2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA041395
Approve
3. CLOSED SESSION - Real Estate Negotiation (22797 &
22799 Barton)
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Earthquake Preparedness Month - April
1995
B. Proclamation - Natural Resources Conservation Month -
Apnl 1995
C. Proclamation - National Community Development Week -
April 10 - 16, 1995
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine & noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council -
member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of
an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
COUNCIL AGENDA
04/13/95 PAGE 3 OF 3
4
m
PENDING C R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
�a 4 0111 1u 1 Y 1;
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held
in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace,
California, on March 23, 1995 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Chairman
4, Gene Carlstrom, Vice -Chairman
Herman Hilkey, Agency Member
Jim Singley, Agency Member
Dan Buchanan, Agency Member
Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director
Brenda Stanfill, Secretary
John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager
Bernard Simon, Finance Director
Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director
Captain Denham, Sheriff's Department
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MARCH 9. 1995 CRA MINUTES
CRA-95-20 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN CARLSTROM, SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER BUCHANAN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the March 9, 1995 CRA
Minutes.
APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA032395
CRA-95-21 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register CRA032395.
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
CRA-95-22 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt the Statement of Investment
Policy for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace.
Chairman Matteson convened CRA meeting at 6:20 P.M.
Chairman Matteson Reconvened CRA meeting at 7:45 P.M.
ADD THE REHABILITATION OF THE OLD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BUILDING FOR THE HOUSING/BUILDING AND SAFETY/PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
C R A AGENDA ITEM NO.
f INDING C R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1
DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO.041395
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO. VENDOR
P10252 CASH
P10260 CASH
P10261 CASH
P10282 HALLY CAPPIELLO
31293
SCOTT MORRISON & ASSOC.
n
31327
EWING IRRIGATION
a
31332
KITCHEN CONCEPT BY HARLOW
a
31336
HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS
31342
PIP
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES
31353
ONE STOP LANDSCAPE
31357
Z
PETTY CASH
31372
SNYDER'S PEST CONTROL
^P
Iv
DESCRIPTION
CASHIERS CHECK TO EMERALD ESCROW TO
PURCHASE HOUSE AT 21815 VIVIENDA
CASHIERS CHECK TO FEDERAL RESERVE BANK TO
PURCHASE U.S. TREASURY BILL
CASHIERS CHECK TO FEDERAL RESERVE BANK TO
PURCHASE U.S. TREASURY BILL
HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT INTERN,3/14-3/23/95
AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE
ASBESTOS REPORT, 11695 CANAL
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES, 22610 RAVEN
GAS RANGE, 22610 RAVEN
LANDSCAPE MATERIAL,22610 RAVEN
ENGINEERING SERVICES,2/27-3/36/95
(CLERICAL WORK)
DUMP CHARGES FOR 22610 RAVEN
REIMBURSE PETTY CASH
FUMIGATE 11881 PRESTON/22610 RAVEN
AMOUNT
$ 69,988.50
500,000.00
500,000.00
223.40
390.00
12.22
365.27
91.50
44.00
91.59
47.81
1,834.00
Tt-t-V of Granh Ourrart
�r�clttmtt�ta�t
CALIF MU MRMQUMM PREPAREDNESS MOMM
April 0"
WHEREAS, the State of California continues to mverlence demmuting sdsmic activity that causes
lose of We and property, as evidenced by the magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles County
on January 17,19K the magniturde 73 Landers earthquake in San Bernardino County on June 28, LM (the
largest to occur in California since 1952) and the magnitude 7.1 Cape Mendocino earthquake in Humbolt
County on April 25, IM; and
WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilson has acpressed his commitment to earthquake preparedness by
proclaiming April as California Earthquake Preparedness Month and urging Californians to learn earthquake
safety mascara; and
WHEREAS, the loos of life and property cam be gratly reduced if appropriate earthquake
pe+elrar+ed>ress maastnare taken before, during and after a damaging earthquake; and
WHEREAS, these lifesaving procedures will be highlighted doing the month of April as the
Governor's Office of Ener geney Services, with the assistance of city and county emergency services offices
and other governmental agencies, service organizations, educational institutions, businesses and Neighborhood
Watch groups, provides earthquake safety information to citizens throughout the state; and
WHEREAS, the masaares pressed in the "THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE, READY? OR NOT."
campaign should increase public awareness regarding proper procedures to follow daring a tremor, and
WI�REAS, this important earthquake safety information should be studied and observed throughout
the year in order to reduce injuries, loss of life and property damage during an earthquake; „
NOW, TBEREFORE9 I Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on behalf of the
City Council, do hereby proclaim April LM as California Earthquake Preparedness Month and encourage
ail to enhance their knowledge and awareness of proper safety measures to follow before, during and
after an earthquake.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and
of the City Council thereof.
This 13th day of April, 199S.
CfttU of (6ranb 01 PrratP
t1rvr1avaatt46'jan
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION MONTH
April 1995
WHEREAS, the people across this land wish to live in harmony with natural resources,
and wish to bequeath a better Earth for our children and grandchildren; and
WHEREAS, conservationists across our beautiful country work hand -in -hand with the
American people to conserve all natural resources to create a healthy land; and
WHEREAS, leadership for conservation of natural resources on private lands is provided
by a partnership of conservation districts, state conservation agencies, and USDA's Natural
Resources Conservation Services; and
WHEREAS, in appreciation for the efforts of landowners and landusers to conserve our
natural resources; and
WHEREAS, April is the month designated to celebrate Earth Day and the 60th ,
anniversary of America's soil and water conservation movement on private lands; and
WHEREAS, now is the time to increase awareness among all Americans of the . +�
importance of our natural resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on
' behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of April 1995 as Natural Resources ;.
.Zz� Conservation Month, and urge all citizens to recognize the importance of conservation in our
— Et;, communities and join in the celebration of the land.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
This 13th day of April, 1995.
E 99
Litt of (Sranb 01 ErrttzF
proriamatI4,10n
NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK
April 10 - 16, 1995
WHEREAS, the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program has operated
since 1975 to provide local governments with the resources required to address pressing
neighborhood and human service needs for persons of low and moderate income; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Program continues to assume
increasing importance as an instrument for meeting pressing community development needs in
affordable housing, job creation or retention, human services, capital improvements, and public
infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the nature of the Community Development Block Grant Program, with its
diversity of program design and administration, and its ability to respond to locally determined
priorities, has caused Congress and the nation to appreciate the critical value of the program, and
____ x the significant number of non-profit organizations, programs and projects that rely on its funds
for support; and �
WHEREAS a week recognizing national community development will encourage g g ty p rage local
jj governments, non-profit organizations, and community residents throughout the nation to reaffirm
the significance and diversity of their local community development program efforts toward <-
meeting the needs of persons of low and moderate income;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Byron R. Matteson, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on .—•�
behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize April 10 through April 16, 1995, as National �c
Community Development Week '95; and urge Congress and the Administration to recognize the
outstanding work being accomplished locally and nationally by the Community Development
Block Grant Program and the importance of this program to the people of San Bernardino County
oc and the Nation. _ .- &&AAL.i _ 1%1�
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
This 13th day of April, 1995.
__,
c
PENDING CITY
I' COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
1
DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:041395
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO. VENDOR
P10247 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P10248 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P10249 COMCAST CABLEVISION
P10251 PATRIZIA MATERASSI
P10252 MICHELLE LAURENT
P10254
LISA STARLING
P10255
PERS
c)
P10256
C
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P10257
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P10258
COMCAST CABLEVISION
P10259
JEFFERY STALLINGS
P10262
a
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P10263
COMCAST CABLEVISION
P10264
I
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P10265
D
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
DESCRIPTION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/15/95
REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEAGUE OF CA CITIES SEMINAR
BALANCE DUE, BUTTONS FOR GRAND TERRACE DAYS
BIRTHDAY BONUS
RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL ENDING 3/10/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/16/95
BIRTHDAY BONUS
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/17/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/95
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/20/95
AMOUNT
$ 65.13
51.03
81.02
187.30
265.13
50.00
4,898.90
285.41
115.17
123.38
50.00
47.48
65.65
138.50
106.80
c
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
3
DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO: 041395
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO.
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
P10284
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95
$ 95.27
P10285
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95
172.11
P10286
COMCAST CABLEVISION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/27/95
142.00
P10288
PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA
HEALTH INSURANCE,4/95,ADDITION
482.68
P10289
INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE
DENTAL/LIFE INSURANCE,4/95,ADDITIONS
34.45
P10290
MICHELLE LAURENT
DEPOSIT,TEE-SHIRTS,GRAND TERRACE DAYS
1,007.25
P10291
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95
247.62
P10292
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95
53.83
P10293
COMCAST CABLEVISION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/29/95
111.36
P10294
VERA HERNANDEZ
BIRTHDAY BONUS
50.00
P10295
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
DISABILITY INSURANCE FOR APRIL,1995
646.78
P10296
PERS
RETIREMENT FOR PAY ROLL ENDING 3/24/95
5,027.27
P10297
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95
152.00
P10298
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95
360.14
P10299
COMCAST CABLEVISION
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 3/31/95
149.84
P10300
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/3/95
436.31
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
5 1
DATE: APRIL
13, 1995
CHECK
REGISTER NO:041395
OUTSTANDING
DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO.
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
31296
DORA HOUCK
REFUND,
OVERPAYMENT OF HEALTH
INSURANCE
$ 61.55
31297
KAREN THOMAS
REFUND,
RECREATION PROGRAM
5.00
31298
MAUREEN SEEGRAVES
REFUND,
RECREATION PROGRAM
5.00
31299
METROPOLITAN LIFE INS.
LIFE INSURANCE,H.GRANT (6 MONTHS)
701.98
31300
RICHARD CHURCHWELL
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
7.00
31301
SUSAN VAGUE
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
3.60
31302
BARBARA OTIWAY
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
8.00
31303
VICKI CLARK
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
2.40
31304
KEITH LEAVITT
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
8.00
31305
JOSEPH SEIB
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
2.80
31306
MARIE WALKER
REFUND,
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
SERVICES
10.80
31307
BLANCA LINDSEY
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
35.00
31308
AA EQUIPMENT
RECOIL
ASSEMBLY FOR BLOWER
140.97
31309
A & A PRODUCE COMPANY
PROLliUCE FOR CHILD CARE
185.20
31310
AT & T
PHONES
FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES
6.98
31311
ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN
SENIOR
NEWSLETTERS (4 MONTHS)
568.92
oi
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
7
DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:041395
OUTSTANDING CHECKS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
31327 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES,CIVIC CENTER $ 58.35
31328 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS MAIL 15.50
31329 FINE LINE
31330 FRIDAY'S
31331 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
31333 HENAGON LIMITED,COLTON
31334 HONDA OF REDLANDS
31335 HONEYWELL, INC.
31337 INLAND ACOUSTICS
31338 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LTD.
31339 INMARK
31340 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP
31341 JANI-KING
31342 KICAK & ASSOCIATES
31343 KIRK PAPER & GRAPHICS
AWARDS, SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL
LANDSCAPE SERVICES, TERRACE PINES-MARCH,1995
EMPLOYEE CHILD CARE SERVICES,APRIL,1995
SAND FOR SAND BAGS, STORM DAMAGE
SERVICE LAWN MOWER
MAINTENANCE HVAC UNIT,CIVIC CENTER,APRIL,1995
REPLACE CEILING TILES, CIVIC CENTER
BUS FOR RECREATION EXCURSION
NAME PLATE, BADGE, AND STAMPS
BAKERY GOODS, CHILD CARE CENTER
JANITORIAL SERVICES, CHILD CARE CENTER
ENGINEERING SERVICES,2/27-3/26/95,
(CLERICAL)
ASSORTED PAPER, CRIME PREVENTION
100.00
200.00
788.50
148.16
137.79
1,114.24
135.16
1,325.00
199.01
71.29
759.00
2,062.50
368.01
r
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
m
DATE: APRIL
13, 1995
CHECK REGISTER
NO.041395
OUTSTANDING
DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 13, 1995
CHECK NO.
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
31360
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER
REPAIRS AT HOLLY AND ARLISS
$ 24,108.65
31361
RICHARD ROLLINS
OPEN/CLOSE TERRACE HILLS PARK,MARCH,1995
180.00
31362
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
HAZARDOUS WASTE SERVICES,APRIL-JUNE,1'995
2,670.00
31363
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FUEL FOR CITY TRUCKS/EQUIPMENT
32.44
31364
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ELECTION COSTS, 11/8/95
200.00
31365
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DUMP CHARGES FOR 2/23-3/8/95
279.03
31366
SAN BERNARDINO MEDICAL
PRE-EMPLOYMENT/TB TESTS
153.00
31367
THOMAS SCHWAB
AUTO ALLOWANCE, APRIL,1995
200.00
31368
SECURITY DATA GROUP
SECURITY MONITORING,CIVIC CENTER,APRIL-JUNE,1995
75.00
31369
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE,INC.
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS, FEB.1995
508.34
31370
SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY
PROGRAM SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE CENTER
363.18
31371
LOUISE SMITH
REIMBURSEMENT FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES
66.02
31373
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
ELECTRIC FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES, PARKS,
SIGNALS, STREET LIGHTS, AND MERIDIANS
10,698.12
31374
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
GAS FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES
630.82
31375
STAPLES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
295.50
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - March 23, 1995
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the
Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California,
on March 23, 1995 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Mayor
Gene Carlstrom, Mayor Pro Tempore
4, Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Dan Buchanan, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager
Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director
Bernard Simon, Finance Director
Captian Denham, Sheriff's Department
John Harper, City Attorney
ABSENT: None
The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh-Day
Adventist Church of Grand Terrace, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by
Councilmember Singley.
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6:00 P.M.
Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6:20 P.M.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Captain Denham. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, introduced Tonya
Nelson, the new Community Services Officer, to the Council and the Citizens of Grand
Terrace.
2A. Recycling Family of the Month - Februga 1995
Mayor Matteson announced that the Pitzonka Family of 12246 Pascal are the
recipients of the Recycling Family of the Month Award and of the local
merchants gift certificates from Sub Depot, Verles's Fancy Pets, Fish and
Grooming, Buttercup Bakery, and Flowers by Yvonne.
2B. Proclamation - Architecture Week March 26 - April 1 1995
Mayor Matteson read and presented Larry Vesley with the proclamation of
Architecture Week March 26 - April 1, 1995.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #�p
03/23/95 Council Minutes
Page 3
Council that they would have the meeting on Saturday, April 22, 1995. He
further asked the Council if they would be willing to sponsor a little league team
as a group. It was agreed that the Council would sponsor a team. The City
Attorney will also sponsor a team. He also reported that he and the City
Manager met with the Chamber President, Don Larkin, and the Chamber
Treasurer, Frank Berry. He stated that he felt that they made a lot of ground
with the Chamber and that they would be meeting again once the Chamber Board
of Directors has had a chance to meet and go over the options discussed between
the Chamber of Commerce and the City to see if there is something that can be
' worked out between the two.
Mayor Pro Tern Carlstrom, reported that he attended a meeting with the Chamber
of Commerce and stated that there seemed to be a renewing of the spirit of the
Chamber and that they would be moving into the Barton Center on La Crosse.
He stated that he believes that the Chamber will ask the City to assist them in
moving.
Councilmember Buchanan, reported that he attended Sharon Korgan's Retirement
party at the Senior Center on Friday. He also reported that he had the
opportunity to meet the new Community Services Officer, Tonya Nelson. He
asked Assistant City Manager Donlevy to tell the Community what they can do
to receive assistance if they experienced storm damage.
46W Assistant Cijy Manager Donlevy, responded that there are a number of ways they
can receive assistance. He recommended that citizens contact the City for
information.
Councilmember Buchanan, asked whether or not people can take advantage of the
low interest loans the Community Redevelopment Agency offers for repairs on
their homes that are due to storm damage.
City Manager Schwab, responded in the affirmative, if they qualify under the
income guidelines.
Councilmember Buchanan, reported that he is looking into the Grey Water Guide,
and will pass it along to Council and Staff to see if we can implement the
program where appropriate. He also reported that he received a letter from one
of the Councilmembers with the Town of Apple Valley asking for support to have
her participate on the California Integrated Waste Management Board, and
questioned if anyone knew this Councilmember.
Mayor Matteson, stated that he has reservations voting for someone that he
doesn't know.
COY Manager Schwab, stated that the California Integrated Waste Management
Board positions are paid positions which pays over $90,000 dollars a year.
03/23/95 Council Minutes
Page 5
Iawlzff' 1_ l
7A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Amending the
Grand Terrace Municipal Code by Providing Standards for the Regulation of
Adult Business and Limiting them in a Designated Adult Business (AB) Overlay
Zone: Providing for Licensing and Regulation of Adult Businesses: Providing
Additional Health and Safety Regulations for Adult Businesses: an ReneaLin9
Sections Inconsistent Therewith,
4 CC-95-26 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER BUCHANAN, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (COUNCILMEMEBR
HILKEY WAS ABSENT), to approve the second reading of the Adult
Entertainment Ordinance and the amended Negative Declaration and direct staff
to process a General Plan amendment to amend the Industrial Districts.
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Utility User Fee Discussion
Mayor Matteson, stated that he is totally against the Utility User Fee, other
alternatives should be looked at instead of turning to raising taxes.
Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom, stated that he is against the Utility User Fees at this
time.
Councilmember Buchanan, stated that he would not oppose the Utility User Fees
if the quality of life would be altered due to lack of funds, he stated that the City
doesn't have a lot of other sources to gain revenue. If the budget could be
balanced without the Utility User Fees then he would be opposed to the fees just
to have extra money, however, he would rather pay the extra money than have
the quality of life decline here in the City.
Councilmember Hilkgy, concurred with Councilmember Buchanan, he stated that
he feels the community would rather have the Utility User Fee to sustain the
quality of life rather than it declining, however, he feels that there are places that
can be cut and would like the Sheriff's contract to be looked into as a place to cut
and to shape the contract to the City's needs.
Councilmember Singlex, stated that he requested that this item be placed on the
agenda so the City Council is provided with the information before budget time
so that the Utility User Fees can be an option. He read aloud the amount of
money it would bring into the City; 1 % would bring in 139,000, 3 % would bring
in 419,000, 5% would bring in 700,000, and 7% would bring in 978,000. He
concurred with the Council that all areas of the budget should be looked
at,however, the Utility User Fee should be there as an option. He directed staff
to look into all areas where revenues can be increased so that the reserves do not
have to be used once again.
03/23/95 Council Minutes
Page 7
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:45 p.m., until the next
Regular CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
April 13, 1995.
11
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
11
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand
Terrace
CRA ITEM ( XX) COUNCIL ITEM () MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT: COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP
f4W Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED XX
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
Discussion
In January, 1995, the City of Grand Terrace was selected by the Integrated Waste Management Board to receive
a $42,000 Household Hazardous Waste Grant for the production of an interactive video based game, "VutiW
Waste" to educate elementary school children. The program is aimed at students in grades 3-6 and will include
an educational video, a game "Virtual Waste", puzzles and quizzes.
A key element is the production of the actual video. This will include students from Grand Terrace Schools and
non -paid actors from Southern California. The location shots will be within Grand Terrace. In order to develop
the video, the City has been required to hire Communications Support Group (CSG) Inc., a company
specializing in Producing governmentleducational videos.
CSG currently provides video services to numerous government organizations throughout California and the
United states. Most notably, they serve as the coordinator of the video services for the City of Beverly Hills. They
have won 3 ACE Awards (the Academy Awards for Video) and have a strong industry reputation for their
quality and expertise.
FISCAL IMPACT
The contract cost for the services provided through CSG is $12,272.32 and outlined as the attachment to the
Contract Services Agreement. The approved budget by the CIWMB was approximately $13,000, so the cost is
under budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
COMMUNICATION SUPPORT GROUP, INC. FOR VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES.
ATTACHMENT
CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT: VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REFORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #13
0
9. Parties agree that all video products resulting from this agreement become the sole
property of the City of Grand Terrace and the California Integrated Waste Management
Board, with all rights pertaining to the sale, reproduction, characters, names, concepts and
story line.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
(A Municipal Corporation)
Date:
CONTRACTOR
LO-A
TITLE
Date:
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP, INC.
P.O. BOX 10968 - SANTA ANA, CA 92711.0968 OFFICE (714) 288.0100
FAX (714) 288.0313
Rudeet Estimate for "Virtual Waste"
Proicct Manaecmcnt:
Exec. Producer/K.Risk - Pre -production planning, Production review
and oversight, producer and crew scheduling, meetings, misc.,
adminstration, budget prcperation - 15 hrs (t7) $45 :...................................................................... $675.00
Prc-Production:
Producer -Scheduling, rewrites, location scouting, storyboirding,
misc.admininistration - 20 hrs @ $30.................... $500.00
..........................................................................
Production Assistant - Equipment pick-up and buying..................................
craft services
8 hrs L $12.................................................................................................................. $96.00
Production: Baled on 5-day shootine xchedule)
Production Packagc
Panasonic VFW-250 Broadcast - Quality Camera
Sony 9900SP Portable VTR
Sachticr Tripods (2)
R" Monitor and Rattcnes
Camcra and VTR 13nttcrncs and Chargcr
AC Adaptcr
Headphones
tW Shotgun Microphone, Zcpplin and Fishpolc
5days Gal $350 a day ............................... ............... $1,750.00
...................................................................................
6X6 Overhead Silk 5 days @ $24 ... ... .. $125.00
...... ..... ............ ....................... .............
....
andbngs 5 days r7 $6 .. ........... ....................... $30 00
..... . ...... . .................. .........
.. ...................... ..
2 C-Stands Gnl $ 15/week ................ ......... ............................$30 00
............................................................
CarMounts - 2 days @ $10 .......................................................... ........................................................ $60.00
Light Kits - 2 L? $60/day ........... .......... $300.00
Craft Sen7ces for 5 days ( morning, Minch, ntavbc dinner)
............... . $500 00
Crew (5 days of shooting n 10 hrs a day)
Producer- 50 hrs @ $30................................. ....................... ..................................................... $1,500.00
Camera Operator - 50 firs @ $20 ......................................$1,000.00
... ............................ .............................
Production Assistant - 50 firs C� $12 ................... .......... $600.00
. .....................................................................
Production Assistant - 50 Itrs (r� $12........ ................................................ $600.00
Post - Production:
Editing: Video Toastcr, RM-450, V0-9900 Player, VO-9850 Recorder
Music Library, "Painter" Computer graphics
30 hrs @ $75 (includes operator) ............. ......... $2,250 00
.............................................................................
Titic and Closing Graphics 8 hrs C $50 (includes operator)........................................................................... $400 00
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: USED OIL OPPORTUNITY GRANT
4W Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
DISCUSSION
The California Integrated Waste Management Board is currently offering a competitive opportunity grant for the
development of used oil collection and public education efforts. In an effort to develop sites in our area, the Cities
of Grand Terrace and Loma Linda have an opportunity to team together on a grant application to establish local
collection sites in an area where there are currently no Certified Recovery Centers (CRC).
Under the grant, the program will fund used oil collection containers, education/public awareness programs,
advertising, assistance to CRC's, consultant costs and personnel costs. The goal will be to site a minimum of two
and probably three CRC's.
The program will be coordinated by Amenclean Environmental Services, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in
waste management issues. They are preparing the grant and will manage the eventual implementation. There is
not costs to the City for their services which would be funded entirely through the grant.
The total grant request is for $97,555, of which the City of Grand Terrace will receive $14,000 to reimburse
personnel costs. There is no financial cost to the City for submittal.
A Resolution authorizing the grant application is required and is attached for the consideration of the City
Council.
FISCAL EMPACT
None by this action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE C= COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, ADOPT A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A REGIONAL APPLICATION BY THE CITIES OF GRAND
TERRACE AND LOMA LINDA FOR A USED OIL OPPORTUNITY GRANT
ATTACHMENTS
APPLICATION COVER SHEET
RESOLUTION
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #3F
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Used Oil Recycling
Enhancement Act that provides funds for cities, counties, and regional government entities to
establish and maintain local use oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate
disposal of used oil; and
WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the
responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary
procedures goverrung application by cities, counties and regional authorities under the program;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with State of California for development of
the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Grand Terrace City Council authorizes the
submittal of a regional application on behalf of the Cities of Grand Terrace and Loma Linda to the
Integrated Waste Management Board for a 1994/95 Used Oil Recycling Opportunity Granv#The
Assistant City Manager of the City of Grand Terrace, or their designee, is hereby authorized and
empowered to execute in the name of the above named cities all necessary applications, contracts,
payments requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds
and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application.
The foregoing resolution was passed by the (Title of Governing Body)
this the day of , 19_ Effective 1995.
AS ATTESTED TO:
Signed:
Date:
Title:
---]
G:-Y s9r--
b •lF of 4, e, e, r of oE- rr7` 44PU��J'"4 4�'C4
( r G used o c l o 4&'16 /-4*1.1'�? 6;K& ./ -
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF AGENT: WINTER STORM DAMAGE/STATE OES
Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
DISCUSSION
With the reoccurrence of storm activity in February and March, the President declared a second disaster for
California which has again made the City eligible for a reimbursement of costs for storm related maintenance
and repairs.
As an applicant for public assistance and reimbursement of costs through both the State of California and
FEMA, cities are required to adopt a resolution designating authorized representatives to deal with each
respective agency. The attached form designates both the Assistant and City Manager to represent the City in our
reimbursement efforts.
4 FISCAL EWPACT
None by this action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTACHED "DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT
RESOLUTION'
ATTACHMENT- Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE�UNCIL AGENDA �M #�
1!
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: HAZARDOUS WASTE/MATERIALS REGULATION: UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY
DESIGNATION- SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
DISCUSSION:
In 1993, the California legislature passed Senate Bill 1082 to reduce the regulatory burden on the business
community by consolidating duplicative regulatory programs. SB 1082 mandates that the administration
of six hazardous waste and materials regulatory programs be consolidated under a Unified Program
Agency, and further, that the Unified Program Agency be certified by the Secretary of the California
Environmental Protection Agency. The six specific regulatory programs consolidated under the United
Program Agency are:
1. Hazardous Waste Generators
4 2. Underground Storage Tank Operation
3. Hazardous Materials Inventories & Release Response Plans
4. Acutely Hazardous Materials handling
5. Hazardous Materials Management Plans & Inventory
6. Above Ground Storage Tank Spill Prevention
The County Department of Environmental Health Services is mandated to seek Unified Program
certification prior to January 1, 1996. Cities may also seek certification if they are presently administering
said functions. As presently exists, the City of Grand Terrace does not regulate said programs.
The attached resolution designates the DEHS as the Unified Program Agency for the City of Grand
Terrace.
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DESIGNATING THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AS
THE UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE & HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
ATTACHMENTS
Letter from DEHS requesting Designation
Resolution
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITYCOUNCIL AGENDA REPOLWOuNC'L AGENDA ITEM # jH
Page 2
Unified Program Certification
1. Hazardous Waste Generators (HSC Chapter 6.5),
2. Underground Storage Tank Operation (HSC Chapter 6.7),
3. Hazardous Materials Inventories & Release Response Plans (HSC Chapter
6.95),
4. Acutely Hazardous Materials Handling (HSC Chapter 6.95),
5. Hazardous Materials Management Plans & Inventory (Uniform Fire Code
(UFC) Section 80.103(b,c), and
40 6. Aboveground Storage Tank Spill Prevention (HSC Section 25270.5).
The Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) currently administers a
consolidated regulatory program for hazardous waste/materials handling and related
emergency planning for twenty six cities out of twenty eight cities county wide and the
unincorporated areas of the County. Additionally, Assembly Bill 1777 (O'Connell), also
enacted in 1993, mandates that hazardous materials inventories and management plans
provided under HSC Chapter 6.95, shall be deemed to have met the requirements of UFC
Section 80.103 (b,c); therefore, DEHS retains regulatory responsibility under the HSC for
program components 1-5 described above. AB 1777 eliminates duplicative reporting
requirements by requiring that one set of information be submitted under HSC Chapter
6.95 to DEHS. DEHS has coordinated data collection and information exchange since
1988 for the above program components 1-5, with the local fire jurisdictions and local
police departments, and will continue to do so to ensure consolidated efforts.
The sixth program component, the Aboveground Storage Tank Spill Prevention Plan, is
administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). DEHS is
working with the RWQCB to coordinate our efforts. The Aboveground Storage Tank
Spill Prevention Plan Program (HSC Chapter 6.95 )and the Hazardous Materials
Management Plans & Inventory (Uniform Fire Code) (UFC) Section 80.103 (b,c) could
be included into the existing data collection and billing functions currently in existence
with DEHS at no charge.
We look forward to continuing our efforts towards regulatory streamlining which will
benefit both business and the environment in the San Bernardino County region. We
appreciate your consideration of our request. Should you have any questions please
contact Peter Brierty, Division Chief, Hazardous Materials Management and System
Support or Doug Snyder, Hazardous Materials Field Services at (909) 387-3080.
PETER BRIERTY, R.E.H.S.
Division Chief, Hazardous Materials Management
and System Support
Enclosures
cc: Pamella V. Bennett, Director
Doug Snyder
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, County
fir of San Bernardino, State of California, this 13th day of April, 1995 by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Absent:
m
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
00 Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
DISCUSSION
Annually, the City of Grand Terrace has solicited bids and proposals for sum sweeping services within the
community. With the coming of the new Fiscal Year, staff is recommending the conduct of a formal RFP Process
and the development of a new contract.
Staff is requesting:
1. Approval of Bid Specifications for Street Sweeping Services; and
2. Authorization to advertise and solicit proposals.
This process is not being pursued based on any dissatisfaction with the current service provider (R.F. Dickson), it
4W is, simply the routine business move to test both cost and service capability of providers. The final contract
approval will be presented to the City Council at the May 25, 1995 meeting.
Copies of the bid document and specifications are on file with the City Clerk's Office or the Community Services
Department.
FISCAL IMPACT
Nominal administrative costs for advertisement and admimstration of the bid process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. APPROVE BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREE>rT SWEEPING SERVICES; AND
2. AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT AND SOLICITATION OF PROPOSALS.
ATTACHMENT
Bid Specifications- On file in City Clerics' Office.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #31
Community Development
Department
DATE: April 13, 1995
TO: City Council
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: GP-95-01 and E-95-03, An application for environmental
review and General Plan Landuse Amendment to allow adult
business/entertainment uses in portions of General Commercial
(GC) and Industrial District (I) for consistency with the Adult
Business Ordinance.
LOCATION: Designated areas within Grand Terrace
RECONBIENDATION: Move to adopt ordinance, Attachment A, to bring the General Plan
in consistency with the recently approved Adult Business
Ordinance.
****************************************************
At its meeting of April 6, 1995, The Planning Commission approved General Plan Amendment
GP-95-01, and respective negative declaration to allow entertainment uses in portions of The
General Commercial and Industrial Districts. This was the last step necessary in the process of
approval of recently adopted Adult Business Ordinance. Please refer to ordinance, and General
Plan Amended Districts Map --Attachment A. The Planning Commission Report and Negative
Declaration are also attached for your information --Attachment B.
Respectfully Submitted,
�5
Patrizia Materassi
Community Development Director
Attachments: A. Resolution and Map
B. Planning Commission Report and Negative Declaration
PM:pp
c:\wp51\planning\cc\GP-95-O 1. ae
COUNCILAGENDAImM# 0
22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 - (909) 824-6621
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on
April 6, 1995 to review this proposed General Plan Amendment and recommended
approval to the City Council of the proposed General Plan I anduse/Map Amendment (GP-
95-01) and associated Negative Declaration (E-95-03) set out in full in the attached
Attachment A, B, C (Figure VI-1, Exhibit A) and D , which amend the General Plan Land
Use Element, portion of the General Commercial (GC) and Industrial (1) land use
categories, pages VI-9 and VI-10.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on April 13,
4 1995 and approved GP-95-01 and E-95-03; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that by this amendment the General. Plan
brings it in conformance with the Adult Business Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Proposed General Plan Land Use and Map Amendment, GP-95-01,
are set out in full in Attachments A,B, C (Figure VI-1, Exhibit A) and
D, are approved and adopted by the City Council.
Section 2: The Negative Declaration (E-95-03) on file in the Community
Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace, E-95-03, is
hereby approved.
Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at
12:01 a.m. on the 31st day of its adoption.
Section 4: Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in
three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as
designated for such purpose by the City Council.
Section 5: First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on
the 13th of April, 1995 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a
regular meeting of said City Council on the 27th of April, 1995.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof
I:ADIIIIIi
r Itlln ■ �...., ■■Ili
r- - -M'-. nni
oil
ii ■ iL •— uilii
�...on Ifni Bill, 1 �. _�•t tnnl
ruelun7 �intnou'T': nnlnnnn►.�g1.���� Inla■■-■tl ■Y Wln low
IIUIIIII� �t�ia■tm■J��ininnlll. ��/1 MIN tvtr'
laa� - nnnma■ �mlu vunl/ :I�I�� /III
Mr.;Mtr■/over • AaYI■nt■• t■O■�■I
.�r■■■nn■•� nitf
&M �■■urtwlo■nnunlunonll■�•,�111t1
of -pill tt■il.nunnln.uui'��'1/��
9■11 : rlln�m■ �plLYlllMUlr II I
aOallnnl■ -• ■llglinl1.11■l1l
II'�l■ . nnunun �Z afasn■!1 t11
91111 : - ■ammo■■ -' nnnum n
linnl mnlmn■ �� anlm_�n •�
- i
nitllstnl■\.�/NS1n 111aI •
71■i1i� �unrmnl■ .It11 tllnl��
;'n �■ G Illlllt►IN MIN,
�t
- V- mill,
: �. ■■p- 111111
HIM
IW91e.1■li0
A
The other item needed to complete the ordinance approval process, is a General Plan e- ,
amendment to allow entertamment/Adult Business uses in the Industrial District (1) and
portions of the General Commerical District (GC) for consistency with the Adult Business
Ordinance.
Attached are those sheets of the General Plan Landuse Map and General Plan Landuse
Element amended, refer to Attachments C&D.
Ia:M 1
Staff feels satisfied with the ordinance as proposed and recommends the Planning
Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the General Plan Landuse
associated ordinance with attachments and related Negative Declaration.
Prepared by,
Maria C. Muett,
Associate Planner
Respectfully Submitted,
Pat rizia Materassi,
Community Development Director
PM/MCM:mcm
Attachments: .4. —Ordinance
— B--?iegetWe
D - Excerpts of General Plan to be Amended
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
M
L Name of Proponent: City. of Grand Terrace
to 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace CA 324-5295
Attention: -Patrizia MaterassL Planning Director, 714-824-6621
3. Date of Environmental Assessment: q-,o? D - 9S
4. Agency Requiring Assessment: CiZE of Grand Terrace
�P�r'al i'a�QH+e.►�mP�il '"�MQi�D�.c�Q�ctSri..d.
S. Name of Proposal, if applicable: AD a t,T' ENTLZM 1AI ME T o CarJ4^k.6'
6. Location of Proposal• cirr gjit� _ &Aftu2r'�q/.t)
ra *F xVAfijP 7&V2AQ=-- 6P-45-01
a--
M Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all 'des" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.)
1. Earth. Will proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
a. Unstable earth conditions or
in changes in geologic
substructures? X
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of this soil? X-
C. Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
1
Yes
Maybe No
b.
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface
runoff?
C.
Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
X
d.
Change -in the amount of surface
X
water in any water body?
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
fl
Alteration of the direction or
X
rate of flow of ground waters?
g.
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer
cuts or excavations?
�(
h.
Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available for public water
supplies?
X
i.
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
4. Plant
Life. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops and aquatic plants)?
3
Yee
Maybe No
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
X
10.
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
X
IL
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population
of an area?
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
v
additional housing?
13.
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
ie
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
�C
C. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
5
Yes
Maybe N
a. Power or natural gas?
A
b. Communications systems?
?A
C. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
X
e. Storm water drainage?
X
L Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
X
hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
Proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
x
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
v
!�
archaeological site?
%/
No
more separate resources may be Yes Mae
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
Environmental Ddermination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
en*Onment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Y
I find that, although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a si gnificant effect in this case because the
ion measures described on attached sheets have been added to the ro'ect.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. P J
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ct on the environment
3
Date
9
Patrizia Materassi
Planning Director
Signature
For City of Grand Terrace
Few offices are located in Grand Terrace, and most are located in mixed
commercial and office developments. A free-standing office building has been
completed on the south side of Barton Road near the Gage Canal.
Prevention of "strip -commercial" uses along Barton Road is a major concern.
It is the intent of the General Plan that new commercial uses be carefully
monitored. New commercial uses should relate to existing development.
Isolated commercial projects as well as conversion of residential units to
commercial use should be limited and prevented wherever possible.
4 The use of a Specific Plan, as previously described, is required for larger
commercial developments (e.g., projects of 10 or more acres).
Two commercial use categories are shown on the Land Use Policy Map.
GC. General Commercial:
Retail and related commercial uses, including neighborhood shopping centers.
Portions of General (GQ area allow adnit b== uses as
r kcmd in landm map, = 1~igare VI 1, t A.
Implementation Policies:
DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL USES
SHALL BE ENCOURAGED.
ADDITIONAL FREEWAY SERVICE -ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES
SHALL BE ENCOURAGED.
COMMERCIAL AREAS ALONG BARTON ROAD SHALL BE
DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL STUDY AND METHODS TO PREVENT
'STRIP -COMMERCIAL" TYPE DEVELOPMENT INVESTIGATED; THIS
WELL REQUIRE FINANCIAL AND LEGAL COOPERATION BETWEEN
LOCAL MERCHANTS, LAND OWNERS, AND THE CITY.
Community Development
Department
DATE: April 13, 1995
TO: City Council
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(RTIP)
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting of June 23, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution No. 93-24, which listed 15
capital improvement projects to be part of the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
(RTEP). The Resolution was forwarded to SANBAG and projects were all incorporated into the
1993-99 Amended Federal TIP. For your information, RTIP's are put together by sub -regional
organizations and forwarded to SCAG. SCAG in its turn forwards it to the State. The State
transforms it into the STIP and submits it to the Federal Government for release of funds. The
RTlP and STEP are subject to air quality conformity requirements in each step of the way.
This year, SANBAG is requesting us to review the previous list of projects, for inclusion on this
next cycle (RTIP 1996-2002).
DISCUSSION:
Please note that while in the past, the RTIP list consisted of projects we wish to be funded and
wanted to have a foot in the door, currently, the list should only include those projects we are
really serious about pursuing, either through our gas tax, Measure I,development fee funds,
and/or by grant applications.
Projects to be funded by federal dollars, and regionally significant projects shall be part of the
RTIP, otherwise they will not be eligible for funding. Regionally significant projects shall be
included regardless of funding needs. Since the majority of the funds available to us from
SANBAG programming are from ISTEA related source, the ISTEA is a federal fund, we should
include all projects we would like to pursue in this list, unless we can afford them on our own.
COUNCIL AGENDAREM# QjA
22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 - (909) 824-6621
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 1996-2002
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Il"ROVEMENT PLAN (RTIP)
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is located in San Bernardino County and San Bernardino
County is located within the metropolitan planning boundaries of the Southern California
Association of Governments; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
requires SCAG to adopt a regional transportation improvement program for the metropolitan
planning area; and
WHEREAS, the 1991 ISTEA also requires that the regional transportation improvement
program include a financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation improvement program
can be implemented; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG is the agency responsible for short-range capital and service
planning and programming for the (County of San Bernardino) area within SCAG; and
WHEREAS, as the responsible agency for short-range transportation planning, SANBAG
is responsible for the development of the San Bernardino County Transportation Improvement
Program, including all projects utilizing federal and state highway and transit funds; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG must determine, on an annual basis, the total amount of funds
that could be available for transportation projects within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG will adopt the FY 1996-2002 San Bernardino County
Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal years 1995/96, 1996/97 and 1997/98 for
funding purposes, and will adopt the Program for fiscal years 1998/99 through 2001/02 for
programming purposes and to allow environmental work on approved projects to proceed.
WHEREAS, SANBAG's Transportation Improvement Program Financial Plan will
identify the resources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the
program.
WHEREAS, SANBAG's Financial Plan, among other things certifies that the projects
in the FY 1996/02 San Bernardino County Regional Transportation Improvement Program
remain the highest priority for funding by the agency.
WHEREAS, SANBAG has distributed RTIP guidelines and requested City's list of
projects by May 1, 1995.
Attachment A
I, BRENDA STANFILL, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 13th day of April, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
4 ABSENT:
no
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
John Harper, City Attorney
c:\wp51\planning\cc\r ip95.res
City Clerk
c
I
PAGE 846
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
DATE- 12/20/94
1993-1999 AMENDED FEDERAL TIP
PRIORITIES BY YEAR
LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM
(INCLUDES AMENDMENT #01)
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
•• GRAND TERRACE ••
SOURCE_
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TYPE TO 92/93 93/g4 94/95 95/96 90/97
97/98 98/99
RCH-MPO
D1ST-PPNO
MOOEL (E1.000)
AGENCY N
FUND
PROG CODE
FA
RTIP COMMENTS
AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT B
ELEMENT-YR
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
LAST
UPDATF: 08 06/92—�—
R'fIP
COMMERCE WAY
TOTAL COST S1t43
ADD-SGAG
AT IOWA
0[I-31863
07330
NEW CONNECTION TO IOWA/I-215
LOCAL
HE11
INTERCHANGE
E
42
R
67
C
274
ND t2/95 AA 12/04
T
383
-
Y
Y
XSBO
E
R
C
T
83
133
544
?6C1
LAST UPDATE:
08 08 93-
RTIP
COMMERCE WAY
70TAL COST $3550
8 AOD-SCAG
MICHIGAN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET
08-31862
07330
CONSTRUCT 4 LAME ROAD
LOCAL
HE14
E
138
-'
R
2032
C
1:380
-
ND 12/95 AA 12/02
T
3550
n
T
Y
f
PAGF. 845 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DATE: 12/20/04
1993-1090 AMENDED FEDERAL TIP
PRIORITIES BY YEAR
LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM
(INCLUDES AMENDMENT 001)
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
** GRANO TERRACE ••
SOURCE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TYPE ID
92/93 93/94 94/95
95/96 96/97 97/98
98/99
RCH-MPO
DIST-PPNO
MODEL
(S1,000)
AGENCY d
FUND
PROG CODE
EA
RTIP COMMENTS
AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT M
ELEMENT-YR
ENVIRONMENTAL S-ATUS
LAST UPDATE:
08 06 93
RTIP
BARTON ROAD
TOTAI
COST S180
ADD-SCAG
AT SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
08-31804
07330
WIDEN OVERCROSSINO
LOCAL
HE11D
FROM 2 TO 4 LANES
E
20
(20% GRAND TERRACE. 75% COLTON)
R
(T/5 / )
C
160
NO 12/9494 A0. 12/99
t
180
�!! -
LAST UPDATE:
01/31/94
RTIP
BARTON ROAD
TOTAL
COST $558
ADD-SCAG
HONEY HILLS TO N.E. CITY LIMITS
D8-31859
4350
07330
WIDEN FROM 2 TO 4 LANES
LOCAL
HE13
E
53
R
`
C
505
;.
NU t2/94 AA 12/95
T
558
Y
LAST UPDATE:
01 31/94
RTIP
BAR70N ROAD
TOTAL
COST $197
ADD-SCAG
22430 BARTON ROAD (WEST OF I-215)
08-31853
4360
07330
CONST. 48 VEHICLE PARK 8 RIDE LOT
LOCAL
"
HB6A
E
20
n
R
NO 12/93 AA 12/94
T
18
v:
..
X
PAGE 849 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COVERN14ENTS DATE: 12/20/94
1993- 1999 AIIENDEO FEDERAL TIP
PRIORITIES BY YEAR
LOCAL HIGHWAY PROGRAM
(14CLUOES AMENDMENT" 901)
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
•* GRAND TERRACE +•
SOURCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE ID 92/03 93/94 94/9b 95/96 96/97 97/08 98/90
RCH-MPO
O1ST-PPNO MODEL M.000)
AGENCY M FUND
PROG CODE
EA RTIP COMMENTS
AIR BASIN (TCM'S) AMENDMENT M
ELEMENT-YR ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
LAST UPDATE: OB 05/93 r -�
RTIP VARIOUS LOCATIONS - LUMP SUM TOTAL COST $800
ADD-SCAG
OB-03127S
07330 MINOR PROJECTS
MA22
n
0
LTF
E
R
C 200 200 200 200
T 200 200 200 200
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
1"6 Through 2002
Regional Mransportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form
Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Materalsefephone: (909) 824-6621
Agency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fax#: (909) 784-7629
i0 1
Route or Street: Barton Road
RTR #:
$0 1 Project Umits., (Post Miles if on State R;glIZy) I-215 Overpass on Barton Road
DescriFtion of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes add4(If widening shoulder -how many ti., rehibilitatimNof what) (If project is
"regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTII' Guidelines
Widening of Barton Road and I-215 overpass to provide for ad itional two
lanes of traffic. The exisiting conditions is one lane each direction, an4
are left turn pockets to freeway on -ramps. This will provide less congest:
at that location improving
If this UrQied is being amended. nle= Jig:
RIV # 31850
Which RTIP is project currently in (Le. 93-99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendment (what is being d =ged in this project) (from old to new), -
Expected Completion Date of Project?
M
M
N
C
E
EIEMMAW
=HOOI
SF'
\�\
S _
V
co
-/
W
Q
In
SA-N BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GO
1996 Through 2002 t "
Regional !L)mnsportation Improvement_ Program Submittal Form
Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Materassi Telephone:
p (909) 824=6621
ency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fax #; (909) 783-7629
hMiect DescriDfioU _ RMW #:
Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, A�101)One)
Route or Street: Barton Road
$oied amitc: (Post Mies if on 4tatP u:g Intersection of Barton Road and
Michigan Ave.
DeSaipt. • (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how mauy &V r ubUitation-of what) (If project is
"regionally sigm cant" refer to Pg. 18.919 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Improvements to intersection. Acquire additional ROW for ultimate width of
44' half street from current 3' Malt street, widening the Intersection—.
Project will complete the 128' of existing southernly bound lane through th,
intersection. Total number of lanes at intersection will be 4; 2 lanes
northerly, and 2 lanes southernly.. This will provide for greater capacity,
eliminate delays and provide for proper turning movements.
If this ptQject is bdugamrnded, VIC= list
RTR # 31851
Which RTJP is project currently in (* e. 93-99. etc.) 93-99
4W Description of (what is being d =9ed in this project) (from old to new):
No rhangAR needed for project description
lrtl c_Y '
Expected Completion Date of Project?
2 P
r� ``� E Sc
SS �`
0
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNAIENIS
1"6 Through 2002
Regional Transportafion lImprovement.Program, Submittal Form
Agency: City of Grand Terrace ContaCL.Patrizia
ters
AgencyCode: Date: ARMaasi
—ril 7
-,f IM UXITJI.-f rt &-7
Barton Road
Telephonm (909) 824-6621
Fax #.- (909) 783-7629
EMiect Limits: (Bwt Mies if on Stgte lEgIlMy) 22430 Barton Road (between
Road and Britton Way)
Description of EMjed-, (detailWLe. how many Imes currently east and how many
Imes added)(H widaft dodder -how n=V M. rdubilitaflon-of what) (If project is
'regionally signific ant! refer to Pg. 189 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Develop a Park and Ride facility for 48 spaces and portion for mixed use.
Project includes landscaping, irrigation, lighting, grading, drainage and
. I
fencing at Barton Road and Britton Way. I
If this Filed ii bein I)rQjg amended. VJC= I
RTJF# -u-au
Which RUP is project currentjy in (L-e .93-99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendment (what is being danged in this project) (from old to new):
VI-01 "N 0-Mo 365MMUT-774M
Expected Completion Date of Project?
V
A
, I'!,'E i R I i I
', S! L
T'
L r.,M
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNAMM
1996 Through 2002
Regional Z)ramportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form
��,. City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621
Materassi
Agency Code: Date: April 7, 1995 Fag #: (909) 783-7629
' 1 LY 1 I✓ POND t DI D+t 1 111+ 11 .1 0 !To� Y L I,
Route or Street: Barton Road at La Crosse Ave.
Project Limits: (Post Miles if on State IffigilyEW SW corner of Barton Road and
La Crosse at 215 Interchange.
Description of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently east and how many
lanes added)(If widening shouldc�how many ft., rebabilitadon-of what) (If project is
`regionally scant" refer to Pg. 18,19 & 20 of the RIV Guidelines)
Develop a Park and Ride facility for approximately 60 spaces. Project inc]
tion, lighting, grading, drainage, paving, fencing and
ts.
If this project is being amended, nlem list
RTIp # 31854
Which RT1P is project airrently in (Le. 93_99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendment (what is being dianged in this project) (from old to new):
Expected Completion Date of Project?
ion.
R 3 2 - CPMD
�j�
EIMMACE
SCHOM
M =
. a
j W
1 �
M
4!� OR.
1Ti
;1TY
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVF +
1"6 Through 2002 ;
Regional Transportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form
Agency.- City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia
si
Agency Code: Date: Materas
Anti 1
5Inc,. w 7' i
1: ,
Mt. Vernon Ave.
RTW #:
Telephone.. (909) 824-6621
Fax.#: (909) 783-7629
Project Limits: (Post Mies if on State Highway) Mt. Vernon Ave. (Barton Road to
Main St.
D=dption of Project: (detailed-i.e. how mmw lanes currently exist and how many
Imes addeM(If widening shoulder -how many fL, rehabilitation -of what) (If project is
`regionally significant" rder to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Prepare Mt. Vernon Ave for.bicycle lanes and pedestrian facilities. Projec
will complete the widening to two lanes of those portions which are still
restricted to a single lane through traffic. According to City of Grand Te
General Plan, Mt. Vernon is to have a consistent 88' ROW from Main to Bart,
Road:
H this project is bcing amended, nlleease list
RTIP # 31856
Which RT]P is project currently in (Le. 93-99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendment (what is being .d=ged in this project) (from old to new):
No changes needed -for project description.
Expected Completion Date of Project?
i
•+�I
a
M
ill
—i
�_���
it .
� P—
BIZ-_.•.
�I:i •~ �� _ -
EMS
HHE SHit
I~ a �wua . 11� ' ■
-s
�
i�,ye
no
.. --fib-. 111111 lips.
� .•�::._- -. =' - • :: � 1.
'�,�,q'��.•-
I "
�
- • - � -= 00 - is
rZC
....
Ran
,
e
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVE NAMM
1996 Through 2002
Regional Transportation Improvement.Program Submittal Form
Agency City of Grand Terrace Coact. Patrizia Materassi Telephone: (909) 824-6621
ency Code: Date: April 7. 1995 Fax 0 783-7629
$eject Description _ RTIP #:
Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, � One)
Main Street
Mt. Vernon Ave to westerly City
limits (north side of street)
Desgiption of Project: (detailedLe. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many f.,11mabilitatiion-of what) (If project is
"regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RIV Guidelines)
Installation of pedestrian --and bicycle facilities. Proiect includes ROW
acquisition, street improvements, wall painting, landscaping and striping.
If this project is being amended, please list:
RTM # 31860
Which RM is project cu ready in (Lie. 93-99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Ammdmeut (what is bang dianged in this project) (from old to new):
No change needed for project --description.
Expected Completion Date of Project?
SAN BERNA,RDINO ASSOCIATED GOVER1 A11KNTS
1996 Through 2002
Regional Zransportation Improvement.Prograin Submittal Form
n
Agency: City of Grand Terrace Contacffatrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621
en Code: Date: ria JCL E55.L Fax #:
(90 -7629
PcQject Description _ RTIP #:
7s Project being -ADDED, DELE1"ED, or AMENDED One)
Route or Street: Michigan Ave.
Emiect�amitc: (Post Miles if on State Rigs Michigan Ave. (Barton Road to
an TurenT
D� tion of Project: (detailed -Le, how many lanes currently east and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many ft., rdiabWastion-of what) Of project is
"regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the RTII' Guidelines)
Proposed to provide for ultimate improvement by completing portions nf on
lane where restrictions exist southbound and an addition of one lane
northbound. Total of two lanes improved each direction, one lane northerl
and one lane southerly.
If this project is being amended, please list;
RTIP # 31861
Which RTV is project currently in (- e. 93_99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendmart (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
Project_ description not changed. Project limits changed from DeBerry to
Van -Buren. Project total cost has been changed.
RTIP 93-99 combined two projects which totalled $2,076,000.
EJ�oiect Part of an Approved Congedion Mang y [4 yes [ ] No
Expected Completion Date of Project? ' /
rtBARYON
t •
-BIRSP
M t.,
-.-\
CITY � _�. r u. I - 7m,'14
:I
LIMITS
f :L
1 R1 ' -
i- CM
4.1_
=t T- , r, -
M2
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
1"6 Through 2002
Regional Transportation Improvement. Program Submittal Form
Agency: City of Grand Terrace Cone; Patrizia Telephone: (9109) 824-6621
95
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
1"6 Through 2002
Regional Transportation Improvement. Program Submittal Form
AgenC,: City of Grand Terrace Contact: Patrizia Telephone: (909) 824-6621
Materassi
Code: Date
(909) 783-7629
en - : Fax #:
Project Description _ RTIP #:
Is Project being -ADDED, DELETED, (aMe Oue)
Route or Street: Barton Road
EQject amitc: (Post Miles if on State Aighwavl Barton Road at Souther Pacific
Rail Road.
Description of Project: (detailed -Le. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder -how many M, rehabilitsiion of what) (If project is
`regionally Ogni�" refer to Pg. 18919 & 20 of the R11P Guidelines)
Proposal would replace an old two lane truss bridge over S.P.R.R. on Barton
Road with a four lane facility as per General Plan Circulation Element.
Coordination with Colton required. Shared allotment proportion is 75Z
Colton and 25% Grand Terrace of total costs.
If this prQject is being amended, plem list :
RTIP # 31864
4 Which RTIP is project Currently in (* e. 93-99, etc.) 93-99
Description of Amendment (what is being &anged in this project) (from old to new):
Nn r1inngac rn prnaPrr AParri�n inn_ Changes made to project total.
e
rll �_Y �' � 1 1 : 1 1 �1 L-1. .1 1 ►.7. 1 1 \/ 1 �11 tit 7 �11 1
Expected Completion Date of Project?
CITY ( w•«• u__. \
N LIMITS i '' I 1
Community Development
Department
TO: City Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 5, 1995
SUBJECT: Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City of Grand Terrace continue support of the Multi -Species
Habitat Conservation Plan by moving to approve the attached Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) and directing the City Mayor to sign the document.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Grand Terrace passed a resolution in September of 1994 in support of the
preparation of the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The purpose of this report is
to respond to the final Draft Memorandum of Understanding received in march 1995 from
the County of San Bernardino.
SUMMARY OF PLAN:
The Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan is designed to protect endangered species
(both presently listed and those to be listed in the future), as well as preserve a habitat for
these species in the San Bernardino Valley. To achieve this goal, a biological database will
be created which will analyze all areas encompassed in its scope to determine the type and
number of species affected. In addition, a location will be chosen as a predetermined site
for habitat conservation and species protection. Developers will then be assessed a fee
which will be used to maintain the protected habitat. Administrative costs of the project will
be funded primarily through grants.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 613`--
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BY AND BETWEEN THE
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE FIFTEEN AFFECTED
CITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND ADDITIONAL
UNDERSIGNED PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN
IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY.
This Memorandum of Understanding (Memorandum) is made and entered into as of the date
4W of signature by and among the County of San Bernardino and the undersigned cities, state
and federal agencies and other participating local agencies. The signatories collectively are
referred to as the "Participating Agencies." The Participating Agencies for the purposes of
this Memorandum are those that have local land use authority, are self-governing local
agencies or are state or federal agencies with land management authority and/or jurisdiction
over plant and animal species and natural habitats which are the subject of the Habitat
Conservation Plan.
WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies are among the local governments, self-governing
agencies, and state and federal agencies that have administrative responsibility or regulatory
authority over lands within the planning area that are subject to Federal and State statutes
including the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended, the California
Endangered Species Act of 1984 (CESA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the
Federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the California Natural Community Conservation
Planning Act, state planning and zoning laws, and local ordinances, and,
WHEREAS, these statutes direct the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service") and the
California Department of Fish and Game ("Department's to conserve, protect, and enhance
plant, fish, and wildlife species and their habitats from adverse effects resulting from public
and private development and actions, and,
WHEREAS, the various statutes and sources of authority under which the Participating
Agencies function do not empower any individual agency to implement a comprehensive,
multi -agency program for long-term viability of species of concern, and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies recognize the need for comprehensive and
coordinated protection of species of concern, and the need to integrate their responsibilities
and authorities in a coordinated manner to ensure successful, timely, and mutually beneficial
resolution of issues involving species of concern, and,
WHEREAS, the state and federal agencies participating in this Memorandum will ensure that
their regulatory decisions and land use practices will comply with state and federal
environmental and endangered species statutes and regulations and that their management
actions will promote appropriate use and protection of sensitive biological areas under their
jurisdictions, and,
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4.00 PM 1
2.2 Provide Eau4 in Regulation. To provide a comprehensive means to
coordinate and standardize mitigation and compensation requirements so that public
and private actions will be regulated equally and consistently, reducing delays,
expenses, and regulatory duplication. It is intended that the plan will eliminate
uncertainty in developing private projects and will prescribe a system to ensure that
the costs of compensation and mitigation are applied equitably to all.
2.3 Reduce Cumulative Effects. To prescribe mitigation measures for private
development and agency actions to lessen or avoid cumulative impacts to the covered
species and eliminate, whenever possible, case -by -case review of impacts of projects
when consistent with the mitigation and compensation requirements prescribed by the
plan.
2.4 Incidental Take Permit. To obtain the necessary permits or take authorizations
from the Service and the Department to authorize the incidental take of listed species
covered in the plan in connection with otherwise lawful activities within the area
subject to the plan as provided by Section 10(a) of the ESA and Section 2081 of the
CESA.
2.5 Conservation (Pre4istin9)- Agreements. The MSHCP is intended to provide for
the long term preservation of covered species not currently listed as threatened or
endangered pursuant to the ESA or CESA such that should they become listed, the
Department and the Service shall, barring "unforeseen or extraordinary" conditions,
authorize incidental take for the species. To accomplish this, all non -listed species
being considered under this plan will be treated as if they are already listed.
"Unforeseen or extraordinary" conditions shall be defined in the MSHCP and its
Implementing Agreement, but such conditions, for the purposes of this MOU, are
generally understood to be: (1) environmental, demographic and/or genetic stochastic
circumstances that were not and could not be anticipated during the preparation of the
Plan, or (2) information developed during MSHCP implementation monitoring that
identifies consequences of MSHCP implementation procedures that may jeopardized
the continued existence of the species.
2.6 Provide Oversight Control Measures and Standards of Success. To establish
a means in which the MSHCP will provide appropriate and successful methods of: (1)
reporting; (2) accounting audits; (3) funding (short and long term); (4) periodic and
independent biological evaluation; and (5) opportunities for adequate public
participation.
3.1 The Plan. The principal component of this effort is the preparation of a
MSHCP. The plan will adopt and adhere to the best available information on or
methods of conservation biology and identify listed and unlisted species to be covered
in the plan. It will seek to minimize the threats that would lead to listing of presently
unlisted species covered in the plan and identify a reserve system, financing and'
management which are sufficient to conserve the covered species. The plan will
include the development and analysis of appropriate biological data, an alternatives
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4 00 PM 3
3.4 CEQA AND NEPA Compliance. Concurrent with preparation and release of the
draft and final plans, a joint environmental review document will be prepared and
released which will satisfy Federal and State requirements.
3.5 Decision. The acceptance of the plan, the CEQA and NEPA environmental
documents and the Section 10(a) permit applications and the signing of an
Implementation Agreement by the Service will result in the issuance of Section 10(a)
permits, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the ESA, to the local agencies that are
participants in the planning effort for the public and private lands involved.
The acceptance of the plan and the CEQA environmental documentation and the
signing of an Implementation Agreement by the Department will result in the issuance
of 2081 take authorizations for the covered species that are adequately protected by
the plan pursuant to the CESA to local agencies that are participants in the plan for
the public and private lands involved. Other appropriate decision documents will be
issued by the Participating Agencies.
3.6 Implementation. Following or concurrent with the issuance of the biological
opinion, adoption of the plan, and receipt of the 10(a) permits and 2081 take
authorizations, the signatories will revise their land use plans and policies to conform
with the plan and the 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or withdraw from the
program. Take authorizations may not be in effect until land use plans are amended.
Should any participant withdraw from the program, it may adversely affect the plan
area and covered species list and therefore may require appropriate modifications of
the plan. The signatories will also ensure that future plans, policies, and actions will
be in conformance with the plan and the Section 10(a) permits and 2081 take
authorizations.
Should the need arise to amend the plan in accordance with established procedures
due to new information or the development of more effective management
prescriptions or techniques,'such amendment will occur through a cooperative effort
involving the agencies and the public in the southwestern San Bernardino County that
are subject to 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or biological opinions that
may have already been issued.
3.7 Conservation Strategy. The plan shall maximize the use of appropriate
publicly -owned lands, comply with legally mandated conservation measures, and
provide incentives for conservation of private lands (land acquisition, density transfers,
land swaps, tax incentives, mitigation banks, etc.).
3.8 Implementation Funding. The scope of the plan and any preserve system must
take into account realistic, affordable funding sources. The plan shall be based upon
tangible and affordable sources of funds and may provide for increased conservation
if other local, state or federal funding becomes available.
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 5
Foundation, and other State and Federal funds such as those established by the
California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, the Intermodel Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Traffic Management Environmental
Enhancement (TMEE) program and Land and Water Conservation Fund program.
The Participating Agencies will also provide a fair share contribution to funding the
plan preparation and implementation by allocating appropriate staff and support
services.
4.5 Proposed Schedule. Signatories acknowledge that time is of the essence and
hereby agree to make their best efforts to complete and obtain final approval of the
plan by a target date of June 30, 1996. A timeline setting forth specific dates for the
completion of each identified task necessary to complete the plan is contained in
Attachment D.
4.6 Environmental Compliance. In recognition of the goal of achieving the timely
preparation and approval of the plan, all Participating Agencies hereby agree that they
will submit any and all comments on the appropriate environmental documentation on
a timely basis, unless otherwise provided by law.
1 ; • • 1■ 1:11*91111 ►IVA
The County of San Bernardino agrees to provide the following resources and to perform the
following functions according to the funding mechanisms agreed to by the cities, local
agencies, county and other interested parties:
5.1 Lead Agency Act as lead agency for the plan. As lead agency, the County will
aw provide overall leadership and coordination among the Participating Agencies in the
development of this plan. This includes functioning as Local Lead Agency in
complying with the CEQA in conjunction with the Department and coordinating NEPA
compliance in coordination with the Service.
5.2 Planning Team Personnel. Provide the primary members of the planning team
5.3 Facilities Equipment. and Super. Provide office facilities to house the
planning team and provide necessary support such as office machine supplies, etc.
The County also agrees to provide automated support, such as word processing and
geographic information system products directly or through contracts.
5.4 Data. Provide any relevant data in its possession for the use of the planning
team and the Participating Agencies and secure additional data on public lands as
needed to allow completion of the plan and encourage private landowner participation.
The County also agrees to participate in the analysis of the data and formulation of
management prescriptions.
5.5 Public Participation. Assume lead responsibilities for ensuring adequate public
participation by affected parties and interests and actively seek overall public
participation in the planning effort.
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 7
authorization contained in Section 10(a)(2)(B) of the ESA and Section 2081 of the
Public Resources Code for those species through the establishment of a preserve
system that conserves adequate habitat and provides for the retention and
management of such preserves in perpetuity. The Service and the Department also
agree to provide for expedited issuance of Section 10(a) permits and 2081
authorizations for Covered Species not currently listed pursuant to the ESA or CESA
in the event that a non -listed covered species is listed in the future.
6.4 Assurances to Plan Participants. The approved plan shall provide assurances
to Participating Agencies and landowners that if the plan is implemented as proposed,
no additional land or financial compensation will be sought from them without their
consent if "unforeseen" or "extraordinary" circumstances should arise with respect to
rr either listed or unlisted species that are covered by the properly functioning plan. It is
understood that species not covered by the plan will not be afforded the same
assurances as those that are covered. However, in the event that a species not
addressed in the MSHCP is listed at some future date, the Service and the
Department agree to use the MSHCP as a forum for addressing the conservation
needs of the species as required by the ESA and CESA in the same manner that
Covered Species have been addressed. All Participating Agencies will make every
attempt at accommodating the conservation requirements of the newly listed species
within the existing conservation strategies and preserves of the MSHCP.
7.1 Good Faith. This Memorandum is entered into freely and in good faith by the
signatory agencies. Each agency affirms that execution of this document is within its
legal purview and agrees to fulfill the role slated herein and any other tasks and
responsibilities incumbent upon Participating Agencies. All of the Participating
Agencies by signature to this Memorandum agree to diligently pursue completion of
the subject MSHCP and endorse consensus decisions of the Steering Committee as
long as the proposed actions are within the statutory and regulatory ability of their
respective agency.
7.2 Interim Project Reviews and Approvals. All Participating Agencies recognize
that planning efforts undertaken pursuant to this Memorandum can be prolonged
beyond anticipated planning schedules due to various unforeseen circumstances. All
parties agree that interim land use actions shall be considered on a case by case
basis within the purview of each agencies' individual jurisdiction and in compliance
with existing laws and regulations. The MSHCP planning effort shall not be cause to
create a "de facto" moratorium for on -going, otherwise legally adequate programs and
activities. All permit applications processed during the period of the MSHCP
development will be evaluated on their individual merits and in consideration of
cumulative impacts to the species and their habitat. Appropriate incentives to land
holders for the protection on non -listed species may be achieved through
consideration of density transfers, land swaps within the MSHCP area, "Debt for
Nature" exchanges, tax incentives through gifts, donations and conservation
easements, mitigation banks and purchase of affected property.
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4:00 PM 9
By Date
Chair,
San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors
San Bernardino, California
By Date
Mayor,
City of Chino
Chino, California
Mayor,
City of Chino Hills
Chino Hills, California
By
Mayor,
City of Colton
Colton, California
By
4
QI
Mayor,
City of Fontana
Fontana, California
Mayor,
City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace, California
Mayor,
City of Highland
Highland, California
Mayor,
City of Loma Linda
Loma Linda, California
DRAFT - 3/15/95 4-00 PM 11
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
ATTACHMENT A
BOUNDARIES OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
The Habitat Conservation Plan for the San Bernardino Valley will encompass the
area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and
Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San
AW Bernardino National Forest Boundary on the north and east.
A-1
Status
Species Federal State
Coast homed lizard FC2/FSS CSC
Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei
San Bernardino ring-necked snake FC2/FSS
piadoph . punctat Ms modestus
fir Coastal rosy boa FC2/FSS
Lichanura trivimata rosafusca
Coast patch -nosed snake FC2/FSS CSC
Salvadora hexalipis virquftea
Two -striped garter snake FC2/FSS
Thamnoplija hammondii
Birds
White-tailed kite CFP
Elanus Leucurus
4 Northern harrier CFP
Circus Wneus
Sharp -shinned hawk
FSS
CSC
Acci ip ter striatus
Cooper's Hawk
Acci iter coope�j�
FSS
CSC
Ferruginous hawk
FC2
CSC
Buteo regalis
Golden eagle
Aquila ch[ysaetos canadensis
CSC
American peregrine falcon
FE
SE
Falco peregrinatus
Prairie falcon
FSS
CSC
Falco mexicanus
IN
Species
Status
Federal State
San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit
FC2
CSC
Lepus califomicus bennettii
Los Angeles pocket mouse
Perognathus longimembris brevinasus
FC2
CSC
San Diego pocket mouse
FC2
CSC
Chaetodi{Lus fallax fallax
San Bernardino kangroo rat
Dipodommemami parvus
FC2
CSC
Southern grasshopper mouse
Onychomvs torridus ramona
FC2
CSC
San Diego desert woodrat
FC2
CSC
Neotoma le ida intermedia
Status
Family
Species
Federal State
CNPS
Many -stemmed dudleyea
Dudleya multicaulis
CRS
FC2/FSS
Santa Ana River woollystar
Eriastrum densifolium sanctorum
PLM
FE SE
Hot Spring fimbristylis
Fimbris lis thermalis
CYP
FC3B
2
California bedstraw
Galium califomicum primum
RUB
FC2 SR
1113
Los Angeles sunflower
Heliathus nuttallii parishii
AST
FC2
1A
Smooth tarplant
AST
FC2
1 B
Hemizonia puupgens laevis
Southern California black walnut
JUG
4
Juglans califomica californica
Coulter's goldenfields
Lasthenia glabrata coulted
AST
FC2
113
Robinson's peppergrass
Le idium virginicum robinsonii
BRA
1 B
Ocellated Humbolt lily
LIL
FC2
4
Lilium humboldtii ocellatum
Parish's desert-thom
Lycium parishii
SOL
2
Parish's bush mallow
MLV
FC2
1A
Malacothamnus prishii
Pringle's monardella
LAM
FC2
1A
Monardella Drinalei
California spineflower
PLG
4
Mucronea californica
m
ATTACHMENT C
LIST OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES AND POINT OF CONTACT
San Bernardino County
Planning Department
Randy Scott, Planning Manager
385 N. Arrowhead Ave., Third Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182
(909) 387-4146
(909) 387-3223 (FAX)
Citv of Chino
Community Development Department
Jerry Blum, City Planner
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91708
(909) 591-9812 Ext. 520
(909) 591-6829 (FAX)
City of Chino Hills
Community Development Department
Eric Norris, Senior Planner
2001 Grand Avenue
Chino Hills, CA 91709-4869
(909) 590-1511 Ext. 223
(909) 590-5646 (FAX)
&' of Colton
Public Works Department
John C. Hutton, Director
650 North La Cadena Drive
Colton, CA 92324-2893
(909) 370-5065
(909) 370-5154 (FAX)
City of Fontana
Planning Division
Dennis Woods, Associate Planner
8353 Siena Avenue
Fontana, CA 92334
(909) 350-6724
(909) 350-7691(FAX)
City of Grand Terrace
Community Development Department
Patrizia Materassi, Community Development
Director
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
(909) 824-6621
(909) 783-7629 (FAX)
C-1
City of Highland
Planning Department
Steve Walker, City Planner
26985 East Base Line Avenue
Highland, CA 92346
(909) 864-6861 Ext. 215
(909) 862-3180 (FAX)
City of Loma Linda
Planning Department
Dan Smith, Director of Community
Development
25541 Barton Road
Loma Linda, CA 92354
(909) 799-2810
(909) 799-2890 (FAX)
City of Montclair
Community Development Department
Rob Clark, Community Development Director
5111 Benito Street
Montclair, CA 91763-0808
(909) 625-9431
(909) 621-1584 (FAX)
City of Ontario
Planning Department
Otto Kroutil, City Planner
303 East "B" Street, Civic Center
Ontario, CA 91764
(909) 391-2506
(909) 391-0692 (FAX)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 989-1851
(909) 948-1648 (FAX)
City of Redlands
Planning Department
Jeff Shaw, Planning Director
30 Cajon Street
Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 798-7555
(909) 798-7503 (FAX)
ATTACHMENT D
San Bernardino Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Plan Preparation Outline
1. Interagency Coordination and Plan Development Agreements
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
California Department of Fish and Game
Cities
Local agencies, utilities and environmental groups
Local business
2. Biological and Land Ownership Database Assembly
Aerial photography
Data automation
Field verification
Wildlife component
Vegetative component
Map assembly (GIS)
3. Plan Preparation
4. Environmental Compliance
5. Programmatic Permit Preparation and Implementation Agreement
6. Plan Adoption
Tentative Schedule
3 months
9 months
6 months
6 months
3 months
1 month
i MID 1 VU0
Tasks Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May Jun I Jul I AugSe Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan__l Feb I Mar I Apr I May Jun
Interagency Coordination
Database Assembly
Plan Preparation
Environmental Compliance
Programmatic Permit Preparation
Plan Adoption
D-1
ATTACHMENT F
INTERIM PROJECT REVIEW GUIDELINES
This document establishes an agreement among the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
("Service"), the California Department of Fish and Game ("Department") and all other
federal, state and local agencies participating in the San Bernardino Valley Multi -
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) pertaining to an Interim Project Review
Process to be utilized during the preparation of the Plan.
The Interim Project Review Guidelines (IPRG) have two related purposes: (1) to ensure
early review and consideration of proposed projects by the Service and the Department
so that projects which could preclude the successful development of the MSHCP will be
identified at the earliest possible point in the development review process, and (2) to
provide a opportunity for dialogue between the lead agency, the project applicant and
the regulatory agencies to explore alternatives or mitigation measures which could
minimize and mitigate potential project impacts.
Local Agencies have identified that significant problems have arisen in the past when
comments on proposed projects are not received from the Department of Fish and
Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service until very late in the lead agency's decision -
making process. To address this problem with respect to projects which may have the
potential to preclude long-term conservation strategies addressed in the MSHCP or
impact the viability of biological resources, the Service and the Department are
committing to meet with the appropriate project proponent at the earliest feasible point.
Early identification of potential impacts will assist in the preparation of environmental
documents for the project and provide the opportunity to identify potential project
alternatives and mitigation measures for consideration in compliance with Public
Resources § 21080.3(a).
The IPRG specifically does not create an additional layer of project review nor to confer
any additional authority on the Department, the Service or lead agency. The
recommendations of the Service and Department are advisory; the final decision of
whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency
pursuant to existing laws.
A. Guidelines for Projects to Be Included in the Review Process
Each lead agency and/or project proponent shall determine whether a project should be
reviewed pursuant to the IPRG. Generally, the lead agency or project proponent may
consider that a project as defined by CEQA § 21065, except those projects statutory or
categorically exempt from CEQA, located within the sensitive habitat areas of the
MSHCP boundaries, has the potential to preclude long term preservation planning or
impact the viability of biological resources, and it is appropriate to utilize the IPRG. The
lead agency retains the discretion to determine that a project within the plan area,
because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological
resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning.
F-1
C. PROCEDURES
1. At least three weeks prior to the desired IPRG meeting date the Planning
Director/designee or project proponent shall notify the Service and the
department and the MSHCP contact person in writing of any project(s) which the
lead agency or project proponent wishes to have reviewed at the IPRG meeting.
For each project , the lead agency/project proponent will transmit two copies of
each of the following:
• a location map on a 7.5' quad sheet identifying the project site
• a site plan or other illustration depicting the project as proposed
• the project application or other summary sheet identifying existing general
plan designation and zoning, and any proposed changes; existing land use
on the site; and the type and intensity of land use proposed.
• the Initial Study or Environmental Assessment and a biological resource
survey if one has been prepared; if one has not been prepared then a
description of the site including vegetation, presence of a floodplain, blueline
stream, or other environmental resource, hazard or constraint, and a list of
sensitive species which have the potential to occur on site.
• Any other information deemed pertinent by the lead agency.
2. The lead agency or project proponent shall be responsible for notifying the other
party of the date, time, and location of the IPRG review meeting, if the
attendance of the project applicant is desired.
3. At the review meeting, the lead agency, project proponent, the Service and the
4W Department will have the opportunity to discuss the project, answer questions,
etc. A representative from an adjacent jurisdiction which may be affected by the
proposed project may also attend the meeting at that jurisdiction's discretion. At
the review meeting if possible, otherwise in not more than 30 days after the
review meeting, the Service and the Department representatives shall provide
the following information to the lead agency and the project applicant:
• A statement as to whether, in the agency's opinion:
— The project will not preclude long term conservation planning or
adversely impact the viability of a species.
— The project has the potential to preclude long term conservation
planning or adversely impact the viability of a species and
additional studies on specific species may be necessary, and
project alternatives and/or mitigation measures need to be
assessed in the environmental review process.
4. A project may be scheduled for an additional IPRG meeting at an appropriate
date if there is a need for the Service or the Department to respond to a Draft
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration.
F-3
CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT: INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Recommendation:
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX
SUNyIARY:
With the implementation of the California Integrated Waste Act (AB939), a number of key issues within
both the law, as well as, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element are in need of address by the
City. The two key issues are:
1. Review and revision of the City's Municipal Code in regards to solid waste and garbage;
2. Commercial Solid Waste programs, regulation and franchising,
Staff is requesting that the Council provide authorization for staff to begin the implementation of an
aggressive integrated waste management program within the City of Grand Terrace.
DISCUSSION:
In January, 1995, the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element, Household Hazardous Waste
Element and Non -Disposal Facilities Element were approved by the Integrated Waste Management Board
for implementation. With this approval, staff is now seeking authorization from the City Council to begin
the implementation of these documents in two key areas; revision of the municipal code and the
development of a commercial solid waste program.
Municipal Code Update:
Under AB 939, the scope of garbage (trash) shifted from the simple idea of removing waste from a
community to the concept of Integrated Waste Management. This included a shift from the simple
regulation of customer service, rate regulation and preservation of the public's availability to guaranteed
service, to a program which now requires inventorying of waste, recycling and mandated diversion goals,
which if not met, carry potentially high penalties to the local agency.
The existing Municipal Code Section does not address many of the key concepts of Integrated Waste
Management, and is thus in need of a comprehensive revision.
A number of issues are required to be included into the Code include:
• Recycling
• Definitions of Recyclable Waste Matter
• Revisions to Government Code reference and regulations
• Integrated Waste Management
• Diversion
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPOR7COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT
APRIL 13,1995
PAGE 3
2. Authorize the development and implementation of a Commercial Solid Waste Permit Agreement for
a period ending in the year 2000.
3. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of commercial solid waste recycling programs.
These actions will begin a process by which the City will gain leverage in achieving both diversion goals,
as well as an increased control of commercial hauling within the City. As proposed, staff does not foresee
any adverse impacts to either existing haulers or the business community.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize as follows:
4 1. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of a comprehensive revision to the City's Municipal
Code Section 5.42 relating to Garbage and Refuse.
2. Issue all commercial haulers the required five (5) year termination notice (Public Resources Code
49520) for solid waste services within the City of Grand Terrace.
3. Authorize the development and implementation of a Commercial Solid Waste Permit Agreement for
a period ending in the year 2000.
4. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of commercial solid waste recycling programs.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MARCH 28, 1995
CRA ITEM ( )
AGENDA ITEM NO.
STUFF REPORT
COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: April 13, 1995
SUBJECT REQUEST TO SCHEDULE BUDGET HEARING DATES
FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996 BUDGET
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED yy
City staff is in the process of preparing the 1995/96 preliminary
budget. The budget will be distributed to the City Council on or about
May 17, 1995.
The Council is requested to designate two evenings for budget hearing
sessions. Staff recommends that Council consider dates between the
week of May 22 through June 2, 1995, for these sessions. A calendar
has been included for your convenience.
4W Our goal is to pass a budget at the 1st Council Meeting in
June (6/8/95).
COUNCIL AG@EIDA ITEM # 9-D
June 1995
Monthly Planner
•.r r• •.r
�- •.r rr-• • roili
•.r
•.r
•.r
1
2
3
3 M T W T P s
1 2 3 4 3 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
1♦ 13 16 17 (! l9 20
21 22 23 21 23 26 27
22 29 30 31
I
2 3 4 3 6 7 t
9 10 11 12 13 14 11
16 17 li 19 20 21 22
23 3. 23 26 27 2# 29
30 31
m
4 5
--
6 7
8
9
10
:00 PM COUNCIL
MEETING
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
6:00 PM COUNCIL
MEETING
25
26
27
28
29
30
Printed by Instant Calendar on 4/6/95