Loading...
04/27/1995FILE COPY 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 Civic Center (909) 824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 Fax (909) 783-2600 Efyron R. Matteson Mayor Gene Carlstrom i Mayor Pro Tempore J Herman Hilkey Jim Singley Dan Buchanan Council Members Thomas J. Schwab City Manager April 27, 1995 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursday - 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Im AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order - APRIL 27, 1995 6:00 P.M. * Invocation - Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church of Grand Terrace * Pledge of Allegiance - * Roll Call - AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Approve 1. Approval of 04/13/95 Minutes 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA042795 Approve 3. Development Assistance for Pure Design located at 22471 Approve Barton Road ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Recycling Family of the Month - March 1995 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council - member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Approve A. Approve Check Register No. 042795 B. Ratify 04-27-95 CRA Action z C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D. Approval of 04-13-95 Minutes Approve PENDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMIUTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WSUTES REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 13, 1995 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, 4 California, on April 13, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Chairman Gene Carlstrom, Vice -Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Dan Buchanan, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, Secretary John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Bernard Simon, Finance Director PatrWa Materassi, Community Development Director Lt. Kyritsis, Sheriff's Department John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MARCH 23. 1995 CRA MINUTES CRA-95-25 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER BUCHANAN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the March 23, 1995 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA041395 CRA-95-26 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register CRA041395. Chairman Matteson convened CRA meeting at 6:10 P.M. Chairman Matteson Reconvened CRA meeting at 7:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION Real Estate Negotiation (22797 & 22799 Barton) C R A AGENDA ITEM NO. c P�RJDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY kv DATE: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO.042795 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION P10311 STATE COMP.INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE,MARCH,95 P10316 HALLY CAPPIELLO HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT INTERN, 3/27-4/7/95 P10325 CASH CASHIERS CHECK FOR PURCHASE OF 12581 MIRADO AND 11845 MOUNT VERNON P10344 CAPRI ESCROW PURCHASE HOUSE AT 22808 MIRIAM WAY 31391 LEN PERDUE LIMITED RESTRICTED APPRAISAL FEE FOR POSSIBLE HOUSING OFFICES 31393 n A 0 N, INC DEMOLISH HOUSE,22381 VAN BUREN,LESS 10k RETENTION 31396 ALL CITY METROCALL PAGER 31397 BANK OF AMERICA TRUSTEE FEES FOR ALL BOND SERIES/COP m 31401 Z DAN BUCHANAN STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 v 31402 GENE CARLSTROM STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 Now 31412 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SERVICES,11845 MOUNT VERNON 31417 Z HERMAN HILKEY STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 p 31418 INLAND COUNTIES INS. LIFE INSURANCE FOR MAY, 1995 31428 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 AMOUNT $ 123.07 282.00 178,447.50 .83,588.72 1,000.00 4,455.00 105.91 5,213.00 150.00 150.00 106.00 150.00 26.21 150.00 Community Development Department DATE: April 27, 1995 TO: Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency FROM: Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Development Assistance for Pure Design located at 22471 Barton Road ************************************************************** BACKGROUND: On April 11, 1995 the Community Development Department approved an Administrative Site and Architecture (SA-95-01) application for the remodel of a commercial building of an interior design center "Pure Design" to be located at 22471 Barton Road. Pure Design is relocating from 22077 to 22471 Barton Road in the State Bros. Shopping Center. Number 7 of the Conditions of Approval requires applicant to remove front (north) parking area which is functionally illegal, and replace it with grass and landscaping. This condition is contingent on City replacing the existing drive approach with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Please find attached a construction cost breakdown/plot plan (Attachment A). This project will improve the old dry cleaners/card shop building and help the Barton Road streetscape. Staff also had the opportunity to present this project to the Planning Commission during a workshop session on April 6, 1995. Pure Design owners will be repainting the exterior to match the new Stater Bros. Shopping Center colors, and install awnings around the building. A new monument sign is also proposed. Major alterations are planned for the interior only. Further compliance with the Barton Road Specific Plan Guidelines will be required as the facility expands. Please refer to Administrative Site and Architecture Conditions of Approval (Attachment B - SA-95-01). RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends the Community Redevelopment Agency appropriate $2,700 CRA Funds for the removal of driveway approach and the construction of curb/gutter and sidewalk located at 22471 Barton Road to assist Pure Design in their effort to improvement the property. C R A AGENDA ITEM NO.3 22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 - (909) 824-6621 Pro oeed agreement de Street Improvement for Pure Design04 Administrative Situ a rchltectural Review Pro SA-95-01 Coot Coot Coot Pave Back: lin. Ft. S . Footage S . Footage $8.00 r . f $15.00 r lin ft $5.00 r S . f 029, f . O Alternative: Curb & Cutter. Sidewalk: Drive: Drive: Curb & Ovutter. Sidewalk: $3.00 r 5 . f Totals: 1 Remove drive a roach & replace 31 n/a 279 $2.232.00 $248.00 $156.00 $Z666.00 with curb/gutter and sidewalk. r= II � I I i m."�II:u"a II 11 SHOPS � f.700 f0.iT 1:jA I £ERVICE STAR 1 ON NOT A PART i I i REITZ 1I STATER BROS. I{II {i,Il, {li 11 f! I I wok 1111,1W III ULU .,�.� -—BARTON - ROAD-- �� Subject Location a � 0 4 9). All wall signs shall be consistent with the approved sign program for the State Bros. Shopping Center (i.e. channel lettering). 10) Submit Minor Deviation, and sign application prior to the construction of a monument sign on Barton Road. 11) Comply with all American Disability Act requirements (i.e. designated parking stalls and signage for handicapped). 12) "No Parking" signs shall be installed near the loading area at the rear of the building. The approval of the Site and Architectural Review application shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval unless application of a building permit is filed, or a request for extension of the approval is made prior to the expiration date. We hereby understand the conditions of approval and therefore will abide by them. We understand that any non-compliance with these conditions will cause this project to be in violation with the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Codes. This approval is valid for one year. Patrizia Materassi Community Development Director cAwplplanoinglsul 50 Loon Date X / .s Date Date PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 1 DATE: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK REGISTER N0:042795 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR P10307 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P10308 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P10309 P10310 P10311 P10312 P10313 P10314 P10315 P10317 P10318 P10319 P10320 P10321 P10322 COMCAST CABLEVISION PEBSCO STATE COMP INSURANCE FUND ROBERTA SOLANO CATALINA VARELA OPOSTMASTER-COLTON C LARRY MAINEZ r SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY Gi SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY COMCAST CABLEVISION NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOC. OFFICE DEPOT SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY DESCRIPTION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/6/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/6/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/6/95 DEFERRED COMPENSATION, MARCH,1995 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE, MARCH,1995 BIRTHDAY BONUS BIRTHDAY BONUS POSTAGE FOR METER PLANNING TECHNICIAN, 3/27-4/7/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/10/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/10/95 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/10/95 NOTARY SUPPLIES, CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/12/95 AMOUNT 608.19 242.84 246.99 6,532.99 1,754.26 50.00 50.00 2,000.00 657.92 202.26 120.49 248.23 83.19 52.11 228.23 C7 Cd CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 3 DATE: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:042795 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P10339 ALLSTATE INSURANCE BAL DUE,ADDITIONAL LIFE INSURANCE,H.HILKEY $ 208.86 P10340 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/19/95 79.39 P10341 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/19/95 31.82 P10342 COMCAST CABLEVISION CASH PAYMENTS FOR 4/19/95 22.17 P10343 EARL & PHYLISS WOODRING REFUND, RECREATION EXCURSION 39.00 31385 PRENTICE HALL TEACHER EVALUATION BOOKLET, CHILD CARE 37.64 31386 RICHARD CAPITAL CORP. COMPUTER SUPPLIES, CRIME PREVENTION 127.48 31387 INLAND TRI TECH,INC. REPAIR CARPET, CHILD CARE CENTER 275.00 31388 TRUST COMPANY BANK PROGRAM SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE 21.40 31389 NALDA DONNELLY REFUND, CHILD CARE SERVICES 58.00 31390 TRUST COMPANY BANK PROGRAM SUPPLIES, CHILD CARE 7.99 31392 A & A PRODUCE PRODUCE, CHILD CARE 140.75 31394 AT & T PHONES, FAX 2.74 31395 ACCENT PRINT & DESIGN EMPLOYEE APPLICATION FORMS, LETTERHEAD 237.65 31398 BEST COMPUTERS COMPUTER ENHANCEMENT/TAPES, CITY CLERK 518.71 31399 BOOT BARN WORK BOOTS, MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT 199.12 c r . CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 5 DATE: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:042795 OUTSTANDING --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMANDS AS OF: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 31417 HERMAN HILKEY STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 $ 300.00 31418 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE LIFE/DENTAL INSURANCE, MAY,1995 805.42 31419 INMARK STAMPS, BUILDING/SAFETY DEPARTMENT 42.56 31420 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP. BAKERY GOODS FOR CHILD CARE 104.81 31421 JANI KING-COLTON CLEAN CARPET, CHILD CARE 50.00 31422 KRAFT FOOD SERVICE FOOD, CHILD CARE 985.26 31423 LAYMON CANDY COMPANY CANDY, EGG HUNT 458.62 31424 LONG BEACH UNIFORM COMPANY UNIFORM, CITIZENS PATROL 41.38 31425 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SVC. TEMPORARY RECEPTIONIST/PLANNING SECRETARY 1,236.92 31426 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. LIFE INSURANCE FOR MAY, 1995 290.95 31427 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. LIFE INSURANCE FOR MAY, 1995 536.90 31428 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR APRIL, 1995 300.00 31429 PACIFICARE OF CA HEALTH INSURANCE FOR MAY, 1995 6,539.41 31430 PACIFIC BELL PHONES, CITY OWNED FACILITIES 333.02 31431 PARTY PLUS RENT HELIUM TANK/PURCHASE BALLOONS,EGG HUNT 35.02 31432 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH-GENERAL,FINANCE DEPARTMENT 196.94 c CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7 DATE: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK REGISTER NO:042795 OUTSTANDING CHECKS AS OF: APRIL 27, 1995 CHECK NO. VENDOR 31448 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 31449 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS 31451 WAXIE 31452 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS 31453 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES, D.A.R.E. PROGRAM UMPIRES FOR SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES/CITY OWNED FACILITIES PEST CONTROL, CITY FACILITIES CA LEGAL SERVICES,1995 AND CA COURT RULES AMOUNT $ 194.67 420.00 341.83 145.00 136.49 31454 YOSEMITE WATERS BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES 216.25 TOTAL: $182,273.96 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. BERNARD SIMON FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - April 13, 1995 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on April 13, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron R. Matteson, Mayor Gene Carlstrom, Mayor Pro Tempore 4W Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Dan Buchanan, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director Bernard Simon, Finance Director Lt. Kyritsis, Sheriff's Department John Harper, City Attorney ABSENT: None 4, The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilmember Dan Buchanan, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Singley. Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6:00 P.M. Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6:10 P.M. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Proclamation - Earthquake Preparedness Month - April 1995 Councilmemeber Singley read the proclamation declaring April 1995 as Earthquake Preparedness Month in the City of Grand Terrace. 2B. Proclamation - Natural Resources Conservation Month - April 1995 Councilmember Buchanan read the proclamation declaring April 1995 as Natural Resources Conservation Month in the City of Grand Terrace. 2C. Proclamation - National Community Development Week - April 10 - 16. 1995 Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom read the proclamation declaring April 10 - 16, 1995 as National Community Development Week in the City of Grand Terrace. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM�i � jD Council Minutes 04/13/95 Page 3 5B. Council Reports Mayor Matteson, reported that he received a letter from Mr. Lopez questioning the reasonable effect of charging $15.00 an hour to reserve a park table. Assistant City Manager Donlevy, reported that he forwarded a copy of the letter 4W to the Parks and Recreation Committee and that item will be on the next Parks and Recreation Committee Agenda for the meeting that is scheduled to be held on May 1, 1995, at which time they will bring a recommendation to Council. Mayor Matteson, reported that he met with the Sheriffs Department and it looks like the Sheriffs Contract is going to go up about $100,000.00. Councilmember SingleX, reminded everyone that the Recreation Department will be holding the Annual Easter Egg Hunt at Pico Park on Saturday at 10:00 a.m. sharp. He reported that he attended a SANBAG Conference in Lake Arrowhead last month where he was updated on what SANBAG is all about, what they are doing and what their future is. He also reported that the Shuttle will be eliminated if the ridership is not increased. 4 Councilmember Hilkey, Questioned why staff met with OMNITRANS about the Shuttle without him being present. City Manager Schwab, stated that Omnitrans requested to meet with staff to try and work out a solution to the low ridership problem. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that Omnitrans is not trying to shape the Shuttle Program to help the City. He requested that staff work with him to agree on what the problem is and how to address them before they talk to OMNITRANS. Mayor Matteson, reported that the shuttle ridership may change when the Metrolink is hooked up in Highgrove. Councilmember Hilkev, questioned when that may be. Mayor Matteson, responded that he is unsure. Councilmember Hilkev, stated that the original intent of the Shuttle was the flexibility and OIVINITRANS refuses to be flexible. He stated that he believes that if the shuttle were more flexible and had the City logo, it would be recognized as a Community Shuttle and would have a larger number of riders. Council Minutes 04/13/95 Page 5 8A. Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) CC-95-30 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCHANAN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) Resolution and List of Proposed Projects to be included in the 1996-2002 RTIP. 8B. Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Memorandum CC-95-31 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY WAS ABSENT), to approve the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Memorandum of Understanding. 8C. Integrated Waste Management Program CC-95-32 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER ' SINGLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM CARLSTROM WAS ABSENT), to approve the Integrated Waste Management Program and Staff Recommendations as follows: 4 1. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of comprehensive revision to the City's Municipal Code Section 5.42 relating to Garbage and Refuse. 2. Issue all commercial haulers the required five (5) year termination notice (Public Resources Code 49520) for solid waste services within the City of Grand Terrace. 3. Authorize the development and implementation of a Commercial Solid Waste Permit Agreement for a period ending in the year 2000. 4. Authorize staff to begin the implementation of commercial solid waste recycling programs. 8D. Request to Schedule Budget Hearing Dates Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget It was the consensus of the Council to schedule the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget Hearings on May 30, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. 8E. Sewer Rate Adjustment Discussion Mayor Matteson, requested that the City Attorney review the contract with the City of Colton for the wastewater treatment plant and see what legal grounds the RECEIVED 29 n EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 13,1994 The meeting was called to order at 7:10 pm by chairman Gary Eldridge. REEMITO %1 Ili �►11 �-ITY CLERK'S DEPT. Gary Eldridge, Eileen Hodder, Vic Phennighausen, Darla Wertz, John Donlevy None The minutes of the September 20th meeting were read, corrected, and approved. (a) John presented the first draft of the multi -hazard preparedness plan which will bring the Citys plan in compliance with the State requirements. The draft will be sent out to all agencies involved, seelang comments and changes. The schedule is to have the plan adopted by the end of December. It will be available for distribution in a couple of days. (b) The computer that was supposed to be provided to the committee in place of the one made available from the Sheriffs Department was not satisfactory. Another one will be provided by the City, and should that not be sufficient the unit from the Sheriffs Department will be provided. (a) Vic reported that a Standard Operating Procedure had been written on use of the COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 5A Lcl EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED FEBRUARY 21,1995 MINUTES CITY CLERK'S DEPT. CALL TO ORDER The mating was called to order by the chairman, Gary EkhidM at 7:05 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of January 17,1995 were read and approved with one typographical error. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gary EldridM Frank Wilson, Vic Pfe=Mmamn user, Darla Wert4 and Tun Hodder 4w GUESTS PRESENT: John Donievy, Rids Haubert (Riverside Highland Water Company) COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: 1. John reported that the Emergency Operations plan. will be presented to the City Council for adoption at the next orating on 23 February, 1995. A joint workshop with the Council will be planned in the near future. 2. The plan was discussed, and the next subsequent task of generating the Standard Operating Procedures. The objective will be to discuss policy issues which will influence the procedures. EQUEPNY MACH"Y REPORT: 1. The diesel generator was started during the meeting and functioned properly. 2. All comm.am . ns equiprne'nt is functioning property. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE Regular Meeting MINUTES '.1TY CLERK'S DEPT. March 13,1995 The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met at it's regular monthly meeting at the new meeting place, the Senior Center. Meeting was called to order at 6:02 PM. MEMBERS PRESENT were JoAnn Johnson, Bitsy Miller, Dottie Raborn, Phil Spisak, Harold Lord, and Dick Rollins. Also present, Alternate Members Mike Fasenmyer and Ed O'Neal. MEMBERS ABSENT -James Cook. CITY STAFF - Sharon Korgan, Community Services Officer. GUESTS PRESENT, Captain Denham, Lieutenant Kyritsis, Tonya Nelson, incoming CSO, Tom Schwab, City Manager and Tim Singley, Councilman. AGENDA was approved with the motion by Bitsy Miller and second by Dottie Raborn. MINUTES of February 13th were approved with the correction made by Phil Spisak as noted below. Paragraph "Phil Spisak expressed a desire to enlarge the finger printing program to include all others and offer special Senior Safety. New folders may include medical information and be reducible to wallet size. She would like to present this program at a Senior's General Meeting." to be changed to "Phil Spisak expressed plans to enlarge the finger printing program to include other interested citizens. Special emphasis will be given to Senior Safety. Folders will include medical information and be reducible to wallet size. She would like to present this program at a Seniors General Meeting and continue it at community functions such as Grand Terrace Days." The change was made to the original Minutes before submitting to City Council. PUBLIC COMMENT - None. BUDGET - None. CSO REPORT a. Grand Terrace Days planning is going well. Committee will meet immediately after this meeting. b. The new CSO, Tonya Nelson, will be getting acquainted in the days ahead. c. There have been 4 Neighborhood Watch Programs recently. d. Budget will be submitted as last year. e. Everybody come to the party on Friday from 2 to 4 p.m. Discussion for the evening centered around the City's contract with the Sheriffs Department as well as the function of the Crime Prevention Committee in relation to the Sheriffs Department, the City Manager and the City Council. Tom Schwab stated that during the 1993 process of contract renewal for police services, consideration was given to the feasibility of contracting with the Colton Police Department in lieu of the San Bernardino Sheriffs Department. the Colton Police Department could not provide the same services for the proposed price, and subsequently withdrew from consideration. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #5P2C1 Dick Rollins would like to have Lt. Kyritsis attend Crime Prevention meetings. Jim Singley indicated that the helicopter is back on full budget. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None other than that indicated above regarding the contract. NEW BUSINESS - None. There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned 7:01PM. Respectfully Submitted, Secretary Ann Johnson P9 COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION APRIL 27,1995 4/11/95 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: DATE: PROBLEM: THE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE, REGRETTABLY, MUST ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF REGULAR MEMBER JAMES COOK. THIS ACTION LEAVES THE COMMITTEE IN NEED OF ONE ADDITIONAL REGULAR MEMBER ALTERNATIVES: THE RESIGNATION OF JAMES COOK IS DETERMINED AND AUTOMATIC. HOWEVER, THE COMMITTEE COULD CONTINUE TO FUNCTION ONE MEMBER SHORT. SOLUTION(S): ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF JAMES COOK AND CHANGE THE STATUS OF ALTERNATE MEMBER ED O'NEAL TO THAT OF REGULAR MEMBER PROPOSED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION AND MAYOR BYRON MATTESON TO PREPARE AN APPROPRIATE LETTER OF REGRETS TO JAMES COOK FOR HIS VALUED, ALTHOUGH SHORT, TERM ON THE COMMITTEE. AND ALSO, TO PREPARE A LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO ED O'NEAL IN ACCEPTANCE AS A REGULAR MEMBER OF THE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # �2 b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN LANDUSE AMENDMENT, GP-95-01 , AND ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, E-95-03,FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ADULT BUSINESS ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ADULT BUSINESSES IN PORTIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS. 4r WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995 and February 16, 1995, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Zoning Amendment/Adult Business Ordinance to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing and approved the Zoning Amendment and Adult Business Ordinance on March 9, 1995 with second reading on March 23, 1995; WHEREAS, one item remained to complete the ordinance approval process which was to make all of the codes consistent with the Adult Business Ordinance; and WHEREAS, this requires a General Plan Amendment of the Land Use Element to allow entertainment/Adult Business uses in portions of the General Commercial (GC) and 4 Indistrial (1) Districts; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not pose a detriment to the aesthetic value of our commercial area, residential or industrial areas and to the general welfare of the citizens of Grand Terrace, nor significantly reduce the General Plan landuse for General Commercial and Industrial uses;; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Landuse and Map Amendment (GP-95-01), set out in full in Attachment C (Figure VI-1, Exhibit A) and D includes modifications to the following sections of the General Plan: General Plan Land Use - Commercial and Industrial Section Page VI-9 GC, General Commercial use category. Page VI-10 Industrial use category Figure VI-1 Land Use Policy Map WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration (Attachment B) has been prepared for this project and this Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission and is` hereby being approved by the City Council. COUNCILAGENDA ITFJI# 7A I, BRENDA STANF X, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 27th day of April, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 6 NOES: m ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: John Harper, City Attorney Brenda Stanfill City Clerk TO:. (611R OM: Planning Commission Community Development Department Community Development Department SUBJECT: GP-95-01 and E-95-03, An application for environmental review and General Plan Landuse Amendment to allow adult business/ t uses in portions of General Commercial (GC) and Indastrial District (1) for consistency with the Adult Business Ordinance. LOCATION: Designated areas within the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION: Approval of General Plan Landuse Amendment Ordinance (A� A) and respective Negative Declaration as recommended by staff. 1.14►k1/ I.ZYr►1u 1 ►Y Dl/ 1 �`. Staff has completed an Initial Study to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project, General Plan Landuse Amendment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for approval. (See Attachment B for Negative Declaration and discussion of responses). BACKGROUND The Planning Commission conducted a preliminary meeting on January 19, 1995 and a public hearing on February 16, 1995 and the City Council conducted public hearings on March 9, 1995 and March 23, 1995 for the review and consideration of proposed Adult Business Ordinance. The City Council approved the Zoning Amendment and Adult Business Ordinance. Attachment B 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 9231;-5295 • (909) 824-6621 Community Development Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a AW significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: GP-95-01 and E-95-0 Z An application for environmental review and amending the General Plan to allow entertainment uses in the industrial area for consistency with the Adult Entertainment Ordinance. APPLICANT: City of Grand Terrace LOCATION: Designated areas within the City of Grand Terrace FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. a -3- 20 1 Patrizia Materassi Date Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace Attachment B 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 LI 0 Z 3. Yes Mayhe - NO d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? �( E Ganges in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X & Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? �( Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air sty? .�. b. The creation of, objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? �( 2 11 29 5. 7. E3 Yes Ma e b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing des? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 4 X x X X V M Yes Maybe No d. Alterations to present patterns . of circulation or movement of ' people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rat or air traffic? �( £ Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or 4, ped? .� 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, X including roads? £ Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new ' sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: Yee, mate No " b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building„ structure or object? c Does the proposal have the potential to cause a.physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 2L Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below #4W self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? �( b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief; definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or NO M. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION - 1-5 9-20. No. The proposed amendment shall not result in unstable earth conditions, disruptions, compact or overcovering of soil, ground surface relief, modification of any unique geological or physical features, water erosion of soils, erosion of water systems, exposure of people to earthquakes or unstable land conditions, natural resources, create any risk of explosion, alter the population density of the area, create the need for additional housing, generate significant vehicular movement, or generate needs for additional public transit, additional need for public services, utilities or energy, create health hazards, negative impact to wait vistas or create additional impact to recreational areas. This is due to the amendment being only for general plan land use adjustment and development standards for adult entertainment uses, and each specific land use for adult entertainment shall be reviewed separately in accordance to CEQA. 6 - 7. No. The proposed amendment shall not result in increases of noise level or exposure of people to severe noise levels nor shall it produce substantial new light or glare. The amendment is only for general plan landuse adjustment and development standards, and each land use for adult entertainment shall be reviewed separately in accordance to CEQA, and the City of Grand Terrace and County of San Bernardino Noise Ordinance. 8. Yes. Since currently the area is planned for light Industrial and RetaillLight Manufacturing uses with no provision for entertainment uses. Adult business is introducing a new category of uses which may result in a substantial alteration of present and planned landuse for this area. However, we believe that as regulated in the Adult Entertainment Ordinance, these entertainment uses are subject to a conditional use permit and adult business permit. Considering constitutional limitations these processes fully mitigate the potential negative impacts. 4 21a. No. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the fish or wildlife species or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history. Neither will it have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The proposed amendment is to include additional landuse m these areas, but those project uses will still be reviewed separately in accordance to CEQA and the City of Grand Terrace, County and State regulations as well. 21b,c. Maybe. We feel we have developed appropriate development standards and conditions of approval to avoid possible cumulative negative impacts of the use in these areas. An example of standards and of regulations are the minimal distances to be maintained between sensitive landuses and possible adult business uses and also required distances between subject uses themselves. 21d. No. There will be no adverse effects or impacts on human beings from the General Plan Amendment directly, as each individual proposed adult business use will be analyzed through the Conditional Use Permit, Business Permit, and Environmental process. MEASURES TO REDUCE POTENTIAL LAND USE INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN COMMERCIALLY DESIGNATED AREAS AND ALL OTHER PLAN AREAS WILL BE GIVEN SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. SPECIFIC FEATURES COULD INCLUDE INCREASED SETBACKS, WALLS, BERMS, AND LANDSCAPING. 4DINDUSTRIAL GOAL: THE CITY SHALL PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF LABOR INTENSIVE, LIGHT, NON-POLLUTING INDUSTRY WHICH IS 4W COMPATIBLE ATM THE PRESENT LAND USE PATTERN. Major Significance: Potentially developable industrial designated areas. Issue Assessment - (MEA Reference: 11-D-6) Much of the industrial land in Grand Terrace is devoted to two Southern California Edison Company facilities: a generation plant in the southern portion of the City and a switching substation at the town's northern border. Industrial uses comprise a total of 124 acres, or 5.2 percent of the total land area in Grand Terrace. There is a large (60-acre) area in the southwestern portion of the city which could potentially be developed as an industrial park. In addition, there is a 4W 55-acre vacant industrial area in the northwestern portion of the City. Approximately 32 acres of this area are within a designated 100-year flood plain and would require special consideration relative to flooding before development would be allowed. The Specific Plan guidelines outlined in this section would apply to all future development projects of ten or more acres within these areas. The Land Use Policy Map, Figure VI -I, has one industrial classification: Light Industrial: Non-polluting, light manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution uses. Portions of Industrial (1) area allow adult business uses as reflected in landuse map, sec Figure VI 1, 'bit A. This classification includes a wide range of industrial uses which would be constructed under special industrial development standards. Implementation Policies: ONLY LIGHT NON-POLLUTING INDUSTRIAL USES SHALL ` BE ALLOWED IN GRAND TERRACE. VI-10 CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM QM DATE: April Z7,1995 SUBJECT: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT No Funding Required QM BACKGROUND The operational area concept is intended to decentralize selected State Office of Emergency Services (OES) functions and give more authority to local regions. An operational area is a special purpose organization created to prepare for and coordinate inter jurisdictional emergency operations and mutual aid. The operational area is an intermediate level of government which includes the County and all political subdivisions. It coordinates information, resources and priorities among local governments within the operational area. The operational area serves as the coordination and communication link between the local government and the regional level. This concept is set forth in Senate Bill 1841, authored by Senator Petris, who lost his home in the 1991 Oakland fire. The basis for SB 1841 was the evident lack of multi - jurisdictional coordination during that disaster. This new law places into effect a statewide Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). SEMS outlines the following goals to achieve the operational area concept. 1. The Incident Command System (ICS). The nationally used Standardized Emergency Management System for Field level response. The purpose f the ICS s to streamline and integrate response, provide a unified command structure and an action plan which identifies response strategies. 2. Implementation of a Multi -Agency or Inter -Agency Coordination System. This system will pull together involved agencies and jurisdictions so that decisions can be made regarding prioritizing incidents and sharing and allocating resources. 3. Operational Area Satellite Information System. Provides for the implementation of an integrated operational area communication system. COUNCIL AGENDA fiEM # ,gA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA STAFF REPORT Currently, the EMA funds are distributed directly to jurisdictions based on an annual reporting process submitted to the state. In October 1996, at the end of the Federal fiscal year, the funds will be distributed directly to the Operational Area. In conversations with the State, it is not clear whether the level of funding -will be reduced or remain the same. It is also not clear as to what formula the State will use to distribute funds to the operational areas (i.e., population, etc.). In any event, the Operational Area Coordinating Council may revisit the distribution/use of the funds at the appropriate time (see Agreement Section 3. Consideration). i Section 2. Operational Area Coordinating Council reads, in part: "Persons designated to represent political jurisdictions on the Operational Area Council should be, for Cities/Towns, the City/Town Manager, and for the County, the county Administrative Officer or the individual appointed as the representative by the Cities/Towns or the County. In all cases, the representative of a jurisdiction must have sufficient authority to speak on behalf of the jurisdiction in support of the Operational Area." The City Manager will be asked to delegate a representative for a representation on the council in the Manager's absence or should the City Manager choose to delegate this position. It is encouraged that this position be delegated to the Fire Chief, Police Chief or directly tot he Emergency Manager responsible for the program administration of Emergency Services in each jurisdiction. In addition, this individual should have enough authority to make decisions or vote on actions taken by the coordinating council. It is understood that not all decisions may be acted on at the coordinating council level and, at times, actions may require the approval of the City Manager or City Council, County Administrative Officer or Board of Supervisors. RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA DISASTER RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ORGANIZATION AGREEMENT (March 31, 1995 version). SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: The parties to this Agreement recognize an Operational Area, as the term is defined in 4 the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code §8550, et seq.) which designates an intermediate level of -organization for coordination and communication between political subdivisions within San Bernardino County boundaries. The parties agree to participate in an organizational structure, or Operational Area Organization, which is a planning partnership for a systematic approach limited to exchanging disaster intelligence, mutual aid requests and resource requests in order to foster the effective flow of such disaster information and resource requests in emergencies, and to prepare for disasters through cooperative training and exercise activities. Each of the parties to this Agreement shall designate individuals to be trained to staff functions in the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center (" EOC'). Each party to this Agreement shall also designate, in writing, a line of succession of officials who are empowered to speak on behalf of the party at the Operational Area Organization. 2. OPERATIONAL AREA COORDINATIN COUNCIL An Operational Area Coordinating Council is hereby established by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors to consist of one representative of each of the party jurisdictions to the Agreement, to be appointed independently by each respective party. Persons designated to represent political jurisdictions on the Operational Area Council should be, for cities/towns, the City/Town Manager, and for the County, the County Administrative Officer, or the individual appointed as the representative by the Cities/Towns or the County. In all cases, the representative of a jurisdiction must have sufficient authority to speak on behalf of the jurisdiction in support of the Operational Area. It will be the responsibility of the Operational Area Coordinating Council to establish organizational structure, policies and procedures for the functioning of the council and operational area in accordance with Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) regulations and guidelines. The Operational Area Coordinating Council shall decide when and where it will hold meetings. (March 31, 1995 VERSION) Page 2 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT 5. STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) REGULATIONS The Cities and County of San Bernardino recognize and fully support California's Standard Emergency Management System (SEMS). Development of the San Bernardino Operational Area and its Disaster Response Standard Operating Procedures will be in accordance with the major components of SEMS which include: • THE NATIONAL INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEMS (ICS) • MULTI -AGENCY OR INTER AGENCY COORDINATION • THE STATES MASTER MUTUAL AID PROGRAM • OPERATIONAL AREA The County shall provide an emergency operations center located at 1743 Miro Way, Rialto, California, as the site for the Operational Area EOC. The County shall also provide EOC support staff for the Operational Area Organization EOC during actual operations and drills. All parties to this Agreement shall provide staff, as necessary, for the decision making and operational positions of the Operational Area Organization. This Agreement shall be effective from the date it is executed in writing and shall remain in effect unless and until it is modified or terminated in writing, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by written agreement of a majority of the parties entering into it, subject to approval of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. (March 31, 1995 VERSION) Page 4 4W SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT This agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and be accorded the same force and effect as if executed on one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HAS EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Chairman, Board of Supervisors DATED SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY 4 OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. By Deputy (March 31, 1995 VERSION) Page 6 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT • ► • : 1i . 1 This agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and be accorded the same force and effect as if executed on one and the same instrument. 4v IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE HAS EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS: LI! DATE: BY: (Type Name) TITLE: (March 31, 1995 VERSION) Page 15 March 31, 1995 SUBJECT. EMERGENCY SERVICES: PROPOSED OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT Page 2 . 2. The County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is requesting five (5) original signature pages on bond paper. One of these originals will be returned to your City for your records. Do not return the entire agreement 3. Attached is a Staff Study which you may use to brief your Councils. We greatly appreciate the cooperation between all parties. We feel that this is 4ilir an opportunity for a strong Operational Area Plan in the State, especially for a County of our size and geographical diversity. Sincerely, DENISE L. BENSON, Manager Office of Emergency Services San Bernardino County Fire Department DLB:eam Aft: Staff Study: Operational Area Agreement Operational Area Agreement (MARCH 31, 1995 VERSION) Distribution: Adelanto, Apple Valley, Barstow, Big Bear, Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Hesperia, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Needles, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Twentynine Palms, Upland, Victorville, Yucaipa and Yucca Valley • • • I - _ 0r. 111 - LI 11! i Denise Benson, Manager, County OES Phil Yenovkian, Emergency Preparedness Manager, Ontario Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager, Rancho Cucamonga Bonnie Watkins, Emergency Preparedness Officer, Apple Valley Mike Hatfield, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, Loma Linda = John Schmidt, Emergency Coordinator, Fontana Dick McGreevey, Emergency Coordinator, San Bernardino