The URL can be used to link to this page

09/11/1997FILE COPY 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 c Civic Center (909)824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 a Fax (909)783-2600 Byron R Matteson — Mayor Dan Buchanan Mayor Pro Tempore Herman Hilkey Jim Smgley Lee Ann Garcia Council Members Thomas J Schwab City Manager September 11, 1997 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Regular Meetings 2nd and 4th Thursday - 6.00 p.m Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 COUNCEL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 fD TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6 00 P M Barton Road Tm CIS OF GRAND Tm&CE cowms wrm TnE AmmucAN-s wrm aA-4ijus ACC' OF J, IF YOU REQUIRE SPECM ASSISTANCE TO PARTIOIPA2 1N TMSW=",ihi , P,1EASE0AT4L TBEMY aMWS OF CE AT ( I2 21 AT ITT 49 KOM PRIORTO �. TWUMEMG. * Call to Order - * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance - Sahm Ehas, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church * Roll Call - AGENDA HEMS STAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 1 i Approval of 08-28-97 Minutes I Approve 21 Approval of Check Register CRA091197 Approve 1 Items to Delete 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A Presentation from Pacific Bell - Joam Fmwall 31 CONSENT CALENDAR following Consent Calendar items are expected to be ne and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the wil at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Member, or Citnen may request removal of an item the Consent Calendar for discussion A Approve Check Register No 091197 Approve B Ratify 09-11-97 CRA Action C Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D Approval of 08-28-97 Minutes Approve E Reject Liability Claim - Michowski Reject F Authoruation to Go to Bid - Street Striping Authorize G Highlights of the Economic Development and Downtown Receive/File Revitalization Conference COUNCEL ACTION PEA C RA APPRa1�L REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 28, 1997 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on August 28, 1997, at 6 00 p m PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Dan Buchanan, Vice -Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Jim Singley, Agency Member Lee Ann Garcia, Agency Member Tom Schwab, Executive Director John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Bernard Simon, Finance Director Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director Virgil Barham, Building and Safety Director Lt. Mike Howell, Sheriffs Department ENT; John Harper, City Attorney APPROVAL OF AUGUST 14, 1997 CRA ME9UTES CRA-97-43 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HICKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the August 14, 1997, CRA Minutes APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO CRA082897 MOTION BY VICE BUCHANAN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER SINGLEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register No CRA082897. Matteson adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6 05 p m SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace MAN of the Community Redevelopment of the City of Grand Terrace cRa AGENDA rt=No.l 4 p Ca M PAGE 1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: SEPTEMBER 11,1997 CHECK REGISTER NO: 091197 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: _ _ SEPTEMBER 11,1997 CHECK NO, VENDOR DESCRIPTION _ _ AMOUNT P12023 SUSAN MARSHALL PHOTOS FOR HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM DISPLAY BOARD 39900 P12028 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS REPLACE BASKETBALL HOOP DAMAGED DURING REHABILITATION AT 22555 DE SOTO 3231 P12029 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH INSURANCE FOR SEPT, 1997 51790 P12030 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE FOR SEPT 1997 3843 P12031 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK HEALTH NETWORK INSURANCE FOR SEPT 1997 7128 38675 ADDINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 22555 DE SOTO 8000 38676 ADVANCE COPY SYSTEMS TONER FOR COPIER 8566 38683 VIRGIL BARHAM AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPT 1997 13750 38684 BERGEVIN'S CLEANING SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM DEPARTMENT 4000 38692 COMP USA LASERJET PRINTER, CODE ENFORCEMENT 2.90262 38695 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING MAINTENANCE ON KODAK COPIER, JULY, 1997 5610 38697 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM LAWN SERVICE FOR HOUSES UNDER REHABILITATION, AUG 1997 16000 38698 DUNN EDWARDS CORP PAINT FOR HOUSES UNDER REHABILITATION 2903 38699 J R FREEMAN DESK AND KEYBOARD TRAY, CODE ENFORCEMEN 1,46093 38700 GRAND TERRACE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE GRANT FOR F/Y 1997/1998 7,50000 38711 MARIE LESLIE CLEANING SERVICE AT 21920 GRAND TERRACE RD 7500 38714 OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES FOR HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGR 2909 38717 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 1200 38718 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY CLOSING BILL FOR 21920 GRAND TERRACE RD 2863 PENFULIQ Cffy COUNd PPROIM PAGE 1 CIT-Y-OF-GRAND TERRACE DATE: SEPTEMBER 11,1997 _ _ _ _ CHECK REGISTER NO:. OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: _ _ _ _ _ SEPTEMBER 11,1997 CHECKRO. VENDOR P12010 ROBERTA MILLER P12011 GREG MANN P12012 ANDREA GORDESKY P12013 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P12014 COMCAST CABLEVISION P12015 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P12016 COMCAST CABLEVISION P12017 POSTMASTER-COLTON P12018 DEBORAH SLAICK P12019 INLAND CENTER P12020 PERS P12021 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P12022 COMCAST CABLEVISION P12024 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY O n P12025 COMCAST CABLEVISION P12026 SANDRA AHSUE n I- P12027 AUDIO VIDEO REPAIR P12029 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA P12030 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SERVICE P12031 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK P12032 METLIFE P12033 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P12034 COMCAST CABLEVISION 38672 AA EQUIPMENT 38673 ABBETT WESTERN PARTY RENTAL BIRTHDAY BONUS CONCERT IN THE PARK, 8/24/97 OVERPAYMENT ON COMPUTER LOAN CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/21/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/21/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/25197 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/25/97 POSTAGE FOR RECREATION BROCHURE/CITY NEWSLETTER REFUND FOR CHILD CARE SERVICES AWARD FOR SUMMER VOLUNTEER YOUTH WORKER -FINANCE RETIREMENT FOR PAYROLL 8122/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/27/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/27/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 8/28/97 REIMBURSEMENT FOR CHILD CARE SUPPLIES, (REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL) REPAIR TVNCR, CRIME PREVENTION HEALTH INSURANCE FOR SEPT 1997 LIFE, DENTAL, VISION INSURANCE FOR SEPT 1997 HEALTH NETWORK INSURANCE FOE SEPT 1997 LIFE INSURANCE FOR SEPT 1997 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/3/97 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 9/3/97 PARTS FOR MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT RENT SNOW CONE MACHINE, RECREATION 091197 5000 500.00 28603 27300 26292 44849 21241 51608 2500 8800 5.58259 22460 32526 15604 3169 9952 12584 7,07264 1,08793 41840 97515 8631 27942 8602 3771 1 PAGE 3 CITY -OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: _ _SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 CHECK REGISTER NO: OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: _ SEPTEMBER 11,1997 38703 HOME DEPOT 38704 HONDA OF REDLANDS 38705 HONEYWELL INC 38706 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 38707 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP 38708 JANI KING-COLTON REGION 38709 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 38710 LEROY'S LANDSCAPE SERVICE 38712 PATRIZIA MATERASSI 38713 MISCO 38714 OFFICE DEPOT 38715 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 38716 PACIFIC BELL 38717 PETTY CASH 38719 RICHARD ROLLINS 38720 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 38721 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 38722 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 38723 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 32724 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY 38726 STAPLES 38727 THE SUN SHELVES, RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARTS FOR LAWNMOWER MAINTENANCE ON HVAC UNIT, SEPT 1997 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES BAKERY GOODS FOR CHILD CARE JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR CHILD CARE PROGRAM SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE, SUPPLIES FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER LANDSCAPE SERVICE FOR TERRACE PINES AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR SEPT 1997 AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEMINAR COMPUTER SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE, SEPT 1997 PHONES FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES REIMBURSE GENERAL PETTY CASH -FINANCE DEPARTMENT OPEN/CLOSE AND MAINTENANCE AT R ROLLINS PARK, 8/97 MAP REVISIONS, PLANNING DEPARTMENT LIBRARY GRANT FOR 1997/1998 DUMPING CHARGES, 7/13-7/19/97 SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE AND COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRIC FOR CITY OWNED FACILITIES, MERIDIANS, PARKS, AND SIGNALS OFFICE SUPPLIES AD FOR RECREATION INSTRUCTORS 091197 17018 4838 1,37424 21086 5150 G , 75900 N 44280 20000 _ 35281 14035 4287 24576 976.04 13313 51500 1260 2,00000 38950 23626 8,09855 32754 10800 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY COUNCEL MINUTES regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the iuncil Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, August 28, 1997 at 6.00 p m Byron Matteson, Mayor Dan Buchanan, Mayor Pro Tem. Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Jim Singley, Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Tom Schwab, City Manager John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Bernard Simon, Finance Director Patrma Materassi, Community Development Director Virgil Barham, Building and Safety Director Lt Mike Howell, Shenff s Department John Harper, City Attorney The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Herman Hilkey followed by the Pledge o01 f Allegiance led by Councilman Jun Singley 2A Recycling Family of the Month - July 1997 Mayor Matteson announced that the Kelly Family are the recipients of the Recycling Family of the Month award for the month of July 1997 and of the local merchant gift certificates from Food Connection Restaurant, Flowers By Yvonne, Domino's Pizza and Miguels Jr Restaurant 127 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY COUNCUIWEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following consent calendar items 3A Approval of Check Register No 082897 3B Ratify 08-28-97 CRA Action 3C Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3D Approval of 08-14-97 Minutes 3E Award Contract & Accept Public Right -of -Way Dedications for Pedestnan/Bike Lane Project 3F Award Contract - Pedestrian Pushbutton Replacement 3G Award Contract - TJ Austyn Playground Surfacing COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #Jp Council Minutes August 28, 1997 Page 3 Councilmember Singley, expressed his concern with the proposed private prison in Colton which will hold 1,000 beds. He also expressed his dissatisfaction with the reporting that was done by the Sun He requested that the City Manager and Mayor send letters to the City of Colton in opposition to the prison Mayor Matteson, feels that it is up to everyone to send opposition letters to the Colton Planning Commission, State Legislators, as well as anyone else that has political influence Councilmember Singley, stated that San Bernardino County has the largest number of prisons of any County in the State of California He stated that he received a letter from the Indian Association of the Inland Empire who is celebrating their 50th year of freedom in their country and announced that they will be holding an open house on August 30, 1997 at the Sterges Center for Fine Arts in San Bernardino at 6 15 pm and that the Mayor will be presenting a proclamation Mayor Pro Tem Buchanan, expressed his dissatisfaction with the proposed private prison and stated that this is the time for the City to express its concern He hopes that the City of Colton will work with Grand Terrace to make sure that all of our concerns are addressed CAy Man er Schwab, stated that since this protect is fairly preliminary he will put the City of Colton on notice that Grand Terrace would like to be included as one of the reviewing agencies when this issue comes before the Planning Commission We will need to carefully study the environmental issues and would expect that an EIR will be conducted. He feels that this will be a long process and it will have a direct impact on many areas of our community. Councilmember Singlev, stated that he feels that a letter needs to be sent in opposition to the proposed project Mayor Matteson, requested that two letters be sent one stating the Council's opposition to the proposed private prison and the other requestzon to be one of the reviewing agencies. PUBLIC HEARINGS -1r 6A An Ordinance of the City of Grand TerraceCalifornia, Amending the Adult Entertainment Ordinance of Said city in Z-95-01-A1 and Negative Declaration Addendum. Amending the Ordinance as Follows To Make a Correction to Include an Additional Reauiremant to Maintain a Minimum Distance from Certain Sensitive Uses Such as Parks Schools Churches, Day Care Facilities Freeways and Residential Uses Filed by the City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Dcpa=ent Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public, there being none he returned discussion to Council Staff Report CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETINGDATE September 11,1997 SUBJECT REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM GTLC-97-01 (MICHOWSKI) The City of Grand Terrace has received a claim (GTLC-97-01) for personal injury Ms Michowsla is claiming that unsafe conditions at the Civic Center caused her to sustain mjunes Our Claims Adjuster has reviewed the claim and is requesting that the City reject the Clain and send a standard rejection letter to the claimant A copy of the claim is attached for your review 7 REJECT LIABILITY CLAIM 97-01 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY THE CLAIMANT OF THE ACTION TAKEN COUNCILAGENDA mM#,�E Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE September 11, 1997 SUBJECT STREET STRIPING PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION TO BID FUNDING REQUIRED BUDGETED ITEM Annually, the City of Grand Terrace does a maintenance program to stripe all streets, paint curbs and re -letter all intersections within the City Staff is currently in the process of finalizing the specifications for the 1997-98 Street Stnpmg Program We are now ready for the City Council to authorize the bidding of this project RECOMMENDATION - That the City Council 1 Approve the plans and bid schedule for the 1997-98 Street Striping Program 2 Authorize the bidding of the Project FISCAL E%IPACT: The estimated cost of the program is $23,000 which is included in the Road Maintenance section of the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Budget COUNCIL AGENDA fiEM#J-15F Irr STAFF REPORT Community Development Department CRA ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11,1997 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED _X_ SUBJECT: Highlights of the League of California Cities "Economic Development and Downtown Revitalization" Conference These were the major messages of this conference from my perspective One has to do with the best strategy for economic development and the other with the secret of creating a city center The secret of creature a city center. A city center that works needs to allow people to socialize, to interface, interact, touch and talk The focus of a city center should not just be to "sell things", but to make people have real life experiences winch are educational, social and entertaining Only then the city center will be successful and will not depend upon the types and cycles of retail and commercial businesses Speakers such as William Fulton, the editor of the Planning and Development R rtrt stressed that the goal of downtown is to be "place oriented" instead of "theme oriented" Theme oriented is like Disneyland or another theme that can be copied and transferred to anywhere "Place Oriented" is "Where people experience human dramas within a familiar place", a backdrop which provides people a broader place oriented experience and diversity of activities, a place that integrates civic uses with commercial, educational and entertainment uses i e a library, a museum, activities loyal to the town's values to be durable and beyond retail trends Where the retail may turn over but the public place stays because it means community "the venue is fresh" A place that decreases people alienation from the physical setting A place, a public space that is for people to congregate, make people feel important, make them think The best strategy for economic development This message is everywhere in the economic development field Basically it says • Learn about existing business, more specifically, about existing industrial clusters and help them grow within a regional context You need a job base to support retail development --The smallest 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-529dOGN DA ffEM �A Ty STAFF REPORT ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X ) REQUIRED Community Development Department MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11,1997 NO FUNDING REQUIRED - X REPORT ON THE HIGHLIGHTS OF LIVABLE CONAUNIMS WORKSHOP IN RIVERSIDE MARCH 19,1997 - "Why Develop a `Vision' for the City" rently from other Livable Communities workshops, this one focused on how to implement you want, once you know what you want. Others were only focused on urban design tples and their positive impacts New insights bring people hope' What is a City? "A City is not a vending machine where you place your money (pay taxes) and get something out of it (police protection, roads, affordable housing, park maintenance, etc)" Perhaps the government's goal, the City main job is to bring the community together. The educators, the policemen, brokers, parents, strollers, city officials to work together Everyone is to be needed in one way or another To teach the people not to expect from government but come and be a part of it, be the solution. Make communities more livable In the 21 st century with the new technology age, people and business will move to where they want and where is most desirable Places with no distinction with hostile environments will pass by history "Planning is a passion not just a profession". For that many of our citizens can help us to plan for our fun time By doing it they will be caring for their lads, their safety, basic needs and provision of seniors' "Leaders are agents of change, to fix things wrong and preserve the good and right ones " 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-520WF=aACMa #0H fill + r ,u� Highhghts of Livable Communities Workshop March 19,1997 Stakeho dens Identification - Who are they'? - Who has econormc mterest9 - Who has special expertise? - When should they be contacted9 - What are the demographics? - Who has `People skills"? - Who will be affected - complaints'? - Who will be the users of end products'? Invite every one of them Page 3 "In Monrovia t-shirts used to say `The last person to leave please turn off the light.' But partnerships with Chamber of Commerce, school district and the City fixed a broken community 'f You have several choices - make it happen, - let it happen, observe afterwards and say `what the hell happened?", or - you can guess what will happen' • The secret is to make a few great places to create great personal experiences These can be created by investment in the public realm by local governments or by developers Please feel free to stop at the Community and Economic Development Department to review articles and materials from the workshop Attachment Planning Report article, In Lieu of Statewide Growth Management a Livable Communities Movement Evolves, July, 1997 Livable Places Update, July 1997 c \office\wpwm\wpdo&plammngkorrosp\gplan\hvable wpd pfa�'(fl4cei �clePIas Update June 19" The Need For Safer Streets: Cars kill more people than strangers with guns (at a ratio of 16 to 1), according to research performed by the Environmental Working Group and the Surface Transportation Policy Project And for every pedestrian that is killed by an automobile, 20 more are mjured- a total of 110AM across the United States every year Young children are particularly vulnerable. Thirty-nme percent of all children aged 12 and younger who are killed in motor veiude accidents are killed while walking or riding bicycles, according to the Conservation Law Anyone who has iced the hmnIation of traffic school has also learned that the h)gtier yourspeed,the worsey&raoodent The of a pedestrian being killed is 3.5 pane dEE i a vehicle is traveling at 15 miles per hour, but increases more than tenfold to 37 percw at 31 miles per hour and 83 pens& at 44 nulesper hour Taws, making roads wider, straighter, and easier for drivers to go fast IS actually creating a health hazard. In spite of this fact, only one percent of high- way safety money is being used to protect pedestrians. The rest is spent on automotive "safety measures," such as road widenmg. In fact, the Highway Capacity Manual — which serves as guidance for the industry — defines a pedestrian as a traffic 'flow mterruptim' Engineers are slowly beguuung to under- stand, however, Out making road improve- ments that allow cars to drive faster are not improving public safety at all. An author of a guide to highway planning and design in Vermont notes, "A stretch of Woad that is uniformly too narrow, too curvy, -too steep may in fact be safer than the same stretch with several short -unproved' sections." Tragic Calming As A Solutwm Fifty-five percent of all pedestrian deaths occur on neighborhood streets The death rate is highest in newer, sprawling Southern and Western,commumties which are designed for,° the cat as the major (or only) source of trans- portation Local governments have a unique opportunity to address this problem and cities across the nation are doing so The major antidote is "traffic calming," a tech- nique by which traffic is slowed and streets are reclaimed for the pedestrian and the neighborhood. In Seattle, the city's traffic calming program has reduced pedestrian accidents by more than 75 percent =rg,,n a yu8Tg Investing in traffic calming pays it costs back quiddy An analysis performed for the Bnhsh Columbia Insurance Corporation comparing claims cost savings against project expenses found an average payback period of a mere six months. Among the most effective strategies is the traffic circle, which has reduced accidents by 82 percent in Vancou- ver, British Columbia, and 50 percent in Portland, Oregon. The cost of a traffic circle is estimated by a USA Today report at $6,000 Chicanes slow cars by alter- nating street parking or landscaping from one side of the road to the other or placing an island in the middle of the street so that the driver sees a zigzagged road rather is strategy reduced accidents by 82 percent in Vancou- ver The average cost is $13,000 Narrowing the mad through extendmg curbing at street crossings will cost $2,000 to $5AW This street improvement has reduced accidents in Vancouver, British Columbia by 75 percent Speed bumps cost about g1,500 and reduced Vancouver accidents by 74 percent Reduc- ing the speed lin it, while it is me gmmve, seems to be the least effective strategy, cut- ting accidents by only 30 percent Commg Trafic Reduces Crime Too Traffic calming may not only reduce the number of people killed by can, it may also reduce the number of people killed by strangers with Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE September 11, 1997 SUBJECT STOP SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM INFORMATION ITEM NO FUNDING REQUIRED BUDGETED ITEM DISCUSSION: As part of the City's Street Maintenance Program, the Community Services Department is initiating a number of programs to begin addressing the replacement of worn and faded traffic regulatory signs throughout the City The Department is initiating the first part of this program with the start of a program to replace all of the City's "STOP" signs Over the next four months, the Maintenance staff will begin a three (3) year program of replacing the existing 162 signs with new signs The order of replacement strategy for this program will include as follows 1 Year 1: All main streets, intersections and feeder streets These will include streets along Mt Vernon, Main Street, Pico Street, Van Buren St, DeBerry St and Barton Road Total signs in this replacement will be 62 signs 2 Year 2• All streets North of Barton Road 40 3 Year 3: All streets South of Barton Road 60 The City will be replacing the existing "Engineer Grade" signs with new lugh visibility "Diamond Grade VIP" product produced through the 3M Corporation All signs will be 30" signs and include a graffiti sheeting to allow for ease of maintenance The cost of each sign is approximately $50 and the program each year will be approximately $3,000 These moneys are currently budgeted and will be expended over the next few weeks RECOMMENDATION - That the City Council receive and file this report COUNCIL AGENDA RENI� rr STAFF REPORT ITEM () COUNCIL ITEM (X ) G REQUIRED Community Development Department MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 11,1997 NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SP-85-10-Al and SA-97-02, an Application for Specific Plan Amendment (T.J Austyn Specific Plan) for new housing product on 28 remaining lots of tract 13050 at Lark and Kingfisher TION. Pleasure of the Council its meeting of September 4, 1997, the Planning Commission denied subject project on a vote of 4 to 3, h Vice -Chairperson Van Gelder, Chairman Sims and Commissioner Wilson voting in favor of project. most important factors influencing denial were Developer was not willing to delete the remaining 2 - 1,353 square foot homes T J Austyn's Specific Plan was planned to transition from diversified neighborhoods to larger homes area as it approached the 20,000 square foot/lot zone area toward the southeasterly direction of this tract. These are some of the last parcels in Grand Terrace feasible for larger homes refer to Attachment A - Planning Commission denial resolution, to understand fully all and fmdmgs of denial in favor made statement such as The homes have sunilar massmg as the previously approved homes and a good curb appeal from the street. Architecture and construction appears to be of good quality, lot sizes are good size and neighborfrood is stable The housing market fluctuates and we should not base a decision on the status today These houses will fit in well Single story houses are desired by seniors and overall median is compatible with area Number of lots is not significant to affect the area negatively 22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313-5BOOPOI 8AMIDA ffEM # Aliq Please notice that the only alterations proposed are related to the housing product, as the number of lots, the lot sizes, layout of lots and conditions of approval will remain the same Size of lots vary from 7,200 to 8,000 square feet on Lark Street to 10,800 to 12,000 square feet on Kingfisher Public input has been significant in relation to other projects and predominantly against the project due to downsizing of project homes The developer had a neighborhood meeting which was attended by approximately 25 people voicing their discontent. At that time staff had not reached a compromise with developer Approximately 150 residents were noticed by the developer The Planning Commission public hearing was noticed twice due to continuance and the City Council meeting was noticed once We received three letters from neighbors Please refer to Planning Commission report, Exhibit 1 Attachment O and Attachment C of this report Approximately 8 residents were present at the Planning Commission meeting also to voice their discontent Their major statements were • "T J Austyn promised us the new houses would be the same size or larger than ours " • "We do not want K-Marts or Wal-Marts We want people that purchase at May Company, Hams, etc " I can't sell a 3,000 square foot house if it is close to a 1,350 or 1,500 square foot house • Larger houses will sell faster than smaller houses • No more larger lots are available in Grand Terrace This is our last chance for larger houses • 1,800 median is a good effort of staff however not enough • smaller houses will be more likely to become rentals • either build big or don't build at all, etc Draft minutes will be available at the day of the City Council meeting RECOMMENDATION. Since staff would like to continue recommendation for approval and Planning Commission direction is denial, our final recommendation is at the pleasure of the Councd. Respectfully submitted, Pat=a Materassi Community and Economic Development Director Attachments A - Planning Commission denial resolution B - Staff resolution for approval C - Neighbor letter dated September 2, 1997 D - Negative Declaration Addendum Exhibits 1 - Planning Commission report dated September 4, 1997 2 - Plans PM pp c \oifice\wpwm\wpdocs\planning\cc\sp85I Oat wpd WHEREAS, the proposal average is 1,660 square feet while the area average including approved specific plan is 1,783 square feet, and WHEREAS, although the Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd has made a good faith effort to increase the square footage by including bonus rooms within the garage space, there is no guarantee that the homeowners will utilize the bonus room space, and if they do so the 3rd garage space will not be available, and WHEREAS, market compatibles are low in the area, so proposed housing may not sell for prices estimated by applicant of lugh $90s to $106 per square foot, and WHEREAS, the project has significant potential to negatively impact the property values in the neighborhood and will not facilitate the creation of a balanced housing community, and WHEREAS, it is the duty of the Planning Commission and City Council to protect property values, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1 Deny request of Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd to amend Terrace Hills Specific Plan SP-85-10 for new housing products PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of September, 1997 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TERRACE HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-85-10-A1), DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC HOMES, LTD, AND ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM (E-9 7-04). WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is located in the Grand Terrace Redevelopment area, WHEREAS, the applicant, Diversified Pacific Homes has applied for an amendment to the approved Specific Plan SP-85-10-A1 for new product designs on 28 existing lots with three new floor plans, and WHEREAS, the 28 lots are the remaining undeveloped lots of 85 lots in Tract Number 13050, of which 14 lots are located on Kingfisher Rd, north of Pico St, and 14 lots on Lark St, west of Crane St and west of Van Buren St, and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan (SP-85-10) was approved by City Council Resolution Number 85-21 on September 12, 1985, and WHEREAS, a Planning Commission public hearing was held on September 4, 1997 and a recommendation was forwarded to the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Housing Element goal is for a balanced housing mix, and more availability of larger houses, and WHEREAS, the Community and Economic Development Department's policy has been that "the best project is one feasible to the developer and an asset to the City," and WHEREAS, the applicant, Diversified Pacific Homes has cooperated with Staff in creating a project that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration Addendum has been prepared, and WHEREAS, the following findings have been set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan FACTS The Diversified Pacific Homes Ltd proposal is consistent with the Attachment B will not in and of itself create any adverse impacts to affect the public health, safety and welfare of the surrounding property owners All future development plans will be required to comply with all applicable health, building and zoning codes 5 The proposed Architecture is compatible with the housing in the area in terms of front elevations, materials, colors, and massing 6 Even though the proposed average is only 1,660 square feet its impact on the overall housing square footage for the area as a whole is not significant It decreases from 1,770 square feet to 1,761 square feet 7 The applicant has proposed option bonus rooms for future and optional living space which could potentially increase the housing square footage In the event all the bonus rooms are utilized the proposed project average square footage would increase to 1,904, and the median would remain at 1,800 square feet NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1 The Terrace Hills Specific Plan SP-85-10, is hereby amended to read as follows Page 3 Project Character tics. Product type three will consist of units ranging in size from 1,353 to 1,805 square feet and from three to four bedrooms with an optional bonus room located within the thud car garage Upgraded amenities are anticipated Product type three units are anticipated to range from $140,000 to $160,000 without extra bonus rooms Section 2 Development decisions shall be based on the Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd Housing Plans as incorporated and adopted by Resolution of the City of Grand Terrace r Section 3 That the proposed project is subject to the following conditions of approval The project shall be constructed in accordance with Site and Architecture design as approved by the City Council on September 11, 1997 The project shall be consist of the following (Option as approved by the City Council) a) Accept Optional Bonus Rooms as proposed by Diversified Pacific Homes, Inc, and accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace 11 The Site and Architectural approval for the subject housing units shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval unless application of a building permit is filed, or a request for extension of the approval is made prior to the expiration date 12 All onginal Conditions of Approval associated with SP-85-10, and Tract 13050 approved by the City Council on September 12, 1985 remain applicable and are attached by reference (Attachment E) PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this llth day of September, 1997 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof 1, BRENDA STANFELL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, Cahfornia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting on the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 1 lth day of September, 1997, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Approved as to form John Harper City Attorney LM lm C \wp61\ \p1annmg\sp\sp85109Lrcc Y I agree that it is desirable at some time to build out this development. However, we feel a strong sense of betrayal on the part of the City of Grand Terrace if the amendment to the previously approved planned development is approved The developer is suggesting the following 1 Mat as the price per square foot for the new homes is higher than what we and other homeowners in this development paid, that this will increase the value of our homes However, while the selling price of these homes is supposed to be between $140,000 and $160,000,1 know of nothing that will force the developer to sell at these prices If he cannot sell these homes at the listed prices, what is to stop him discounting them9 And we still fail to see how the price per square foot of a home is a major consideration when purchasing 2 That it is better to have the lots built out than not Quite frankly, we would prefer to have the kris vacant for a few more years than to have single storey 1,300 square foot homes 3 That the value of our homes has dropped 30% since we purchased This is simply not true Based on recent sales, as well as evaluations, the value of our home is currently approximately 10% lower than when we purchased In addition, the market is very clearly moving up, albeit very slowly - - l� We understand very clearly that the market has changed since we purchased five years ago However, the real estate market has always been cyclical, and always will be The market in Grand I erracc will pick up again, and it does not make sense in any way to build smaller homes, with some very small single storey homes, none with walk in closets, on the last and best view lots in this development We are not opposed to development. However, we, and many of our neighbors; are very much opposed to single storey,1,300 square foot homes with no walk in closets In our opinion, nothing should be built in this development than is smaller that what was approved by the City in the original plan We sincerely believe that if the City of Grand Terrace were to approve the amendment, that they and the: residents will regret this decision for many years to come 4 We apprecwte your-on%idLrahon in thi% matter 4r incerely, /-/, / .4 lilton R, Racthel, M13I1, MIIA, A Raethel, RN, MPI1, MIIA, CNAA SEP2-1997 M Irr Community Development Department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development Department TE: August 7, 1997 SP-85-10-A1, and SA-97-02, an application for a Amendment Of Specific Plan 85-10 (associated with Tract Map No 13050) and Site and Archrtegtura . Review for new product design on 28 enstmg vacant lots. CANT: Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd. Andrew B Wright, President 10390 Commerce Center Dr., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 LOCATION: 28 lots in Tract No 13050 14 lots on Kingfisher Road, north of Pico Street, and 14 lots on Lark Street, west of Crane Street and south of Van Buren Street located in Grand Terrace, CA 92313 TION: Approval based on Staffs recommended alterations to proposal and conditions of approval Y OF PROJECT: used floor plan/square footage alteration to original Specific Plan was evaluated Some puiblrc input also taken into consideration. Analysis and Staff conditions of approval for project proposal are ided in the report. isically we would have the right to deny such a project based on City discretionary power as set forth our Zoning Codes, General Plan and several court cages. Our negative findings could be related to, 1) meral Plan and Housing Element goal for a balanced housing ma, and more availability for larger uses, 2) the fact that these are the few last lots where larger houses would be feasible; 3) the fact that the City denying taus project is not denying development rights of the property owner; 4) the lack of mpatibilrty with existing development as previously approved with a median of 2,000 square feet mpared to the proposed project median of 1,600 square feet (median point means that 50% of the uses are at or above that point), and 5) the duty of the Planning Commission and City Council to Aect property values etc Exhibit 1 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 � ` � L •, �f t � { (rig .~(l 1f AND LAND USE: project is located in the RI-7 2 Residential District. The zoning for the properties located to the iediate north, west, and south, is R1-71 Residential, and zoning to the immediate east is R1-20 Jential (refer to Attachment H, Zoning Map) General Plan land use designates the subject properties and surrounding properties as LDR - Density Residential (refer to Attachment I, General Plan Map) L BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: etor's NoW section of the report is to provide the Plannmg Commission with information on project background, code irements, outside agency comments, staff development review process, and negotiations with applicant over two months. Austin Specific Plan project as a whole included 170 units in three tracts. Tract 13050 had 85 i of which 28 lots were not bush. Currently the applicant desires to amend the Specific Plan to .r only floor plan square footage of housing to meet market demands. No lot configuration, dscapmg, or other conditions are being requested to be changed. _ The applicant, Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd-, submitted a Specific Plan Amendment and Site and Architectural Review application on June 3, 1997 to modify the square footage and architectural design of 28 undeveloped housing units in Specific Plan 85-10 Specific Plan 85-10 contains 170 residential lots of which 85 lots are located in the "Field Crest' development, north of Van Buren Street, and 85 lots are located in the "Terrace Hills" development. The 28 lots in question are the remaining undeveloped parcels of T.J. Austyn's "Terrace Hills" development which are included in the original 95 lots Please refer to Housing Analysis - Total Units Table - Attachment L, and Study area Map Attachment IC The applicant has made a good faith effort to bang the new housing I roducts square footage close to Community and Economic Development Department recommendation since submitting an application. On August 14, 1997, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting to present their new products and to hear concerns from the neighbors. Approximately 25 residents attended that meeting AND AR : Site The proposed 28 lots contain graded pads, and small retaining walls designed to facilitate required set back distances All street improvements including curb and gutter and rough street paving have been installed by the previous developer In addition, lights and utilities have also been installed. All stream improvements, retaining walls, slopes, and drive approaches will not be modified with the applicant's ProPosaL 3 real estate brokers, review of building permits and TRW reports, and conducting field inspections The following information was denved from the study 1) Median housing square footle m the study area (refer to Housing Analysis Table 5 - Median Units in the Study Area, Attachment L) O Existing Specific Plan 1,800 square feet O With Diversified Pacific Homes Proposal 1,800 square feet O Without 28 lots 1,800 square feet Finding Median housing square footage in the study area as a whole is not affected by proposed project, 2) Average housing s�auare_ footage in the study area (refer to Housing Analysis Table 6 - Average Square Footage, Attachment L) O Fasting Specific Plan 1,783 square feet O With Diversified Pacific Homes Proposal 1,761 square feet O Without 28 lots 1,771 square feet Finding Average housing square footage in the study area as a whole is not affected by Proposed project 3) Impact of Diversified Homes proposal on study area as a whole (refer to Housing Analysis Table 2 and associated charts - Comparison of Existing and Proposed, Attachment L) — 1,800 to 2,000 square foot units: O Without pa==L area contains 219 units between 1,800 and 2,000 square feet which is 64% of all housing in the study area. O With ^off area will contain 205 units between 1,800 and 2,000 square fi:et which will be 60% of all housing in the study area. Fmdmg• The proposal will reduce this category of housM by 4'/. or 14 units 1,500 to 1,700 square foot units: O Without p=saL area contains 88 units between 1,500 and 1,700 square feet which is 26% of all housing in the study area. O With IMRML area will contain 98 units between 1,500 and 1,700 square feet which will be 29% of all housing in the study area. Finding The proposal will increase this category of housing by 3% or 10 units. _ Negative Findings: Positive Findings: 6 The proposal Average is 1,657 square feet, while the am Average including approved specific plan is 1,783 square feet (Please refer to Table 6 and 9 in Attachment L) 7 Although the applicant has made a good faith effort to mcrease the square footage by including bonus rooms within the garage space, there is no guarantee that tee home owners uhlize the bonus room space Bonus room is not integral of floor plan nor part of house base package even though it does have the potential to increase square footage 8 The current market may only bear houses in the range of S 140,000 to S 160,000, thus the applicant is justifying the construction of smaller units What if the market would only bear houses in the range of W4120,0W Staff finds that this alone is not in of itself justification to construct smaller homes 9 Based on market data submitted by the applicant, "comparabks" (Attachment - M) are low and the area lacks "floor" In other words then is no dynamic trade taking the Baie l'on this piece in area. information, proposed "mg may not sell for prices estimated by applicant of high Ss to S 106 per square foot. 10 Other comparables in the area are associated with distress sales and an relatively lower than apphmt's estimate cash for the new homes, so it is unl&ely that subject homes will be able to sell above the cost of existing homes which an much larger than proposed homes Analysis Conclusion: As proposed, the projects greatest impact is on the immediate neighborhood. As illustrated on the housing analysis area map (to be presented at Planning Commission meeting), the smaller units are dispersed through out the area, and even where there is a lugh concentration of smaller units they are well dispersed among larger units Why is it important to carefully disperse smaller units m an area where larger homes are perceived to be predominate? In simple terms it upholds the "self policing" mechanism most evident in this kind of setting For example, larger houses demand larger household incomes and owners of these type homes give priority to a well maintained neighborhood. Smaller homes on the other hand are usually sold to first-time home buyers with low to moderate income levels, and owners of these homes would like to live m high -end neighborhoods, but historically are located in low -end neighborhoods where beatarfic�tion of front yards is not as lugh a priority A mixture of these two dynamics creates the "sdf policing" mechanism where the owners of larger homes monitor the upkeep of the smaller homes in 7 Reviewing Agency Comments: The following responses have been received from the City's Reviewing Agencies O Building & Safety / Public Works Department comments - refer to memorandum from the Community and Economic Development Director dated June 19, 1997 - (Attachment A) O City Engineer comments - refer to memorandum to the Community and Economic Development Director dated June 10, 1997 (Attachment B) O California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Planning - Refer to memorandum to the Community and Economic Development Director dated June 17, 1997 (Attachment - C) O Riverside Highland Water Company comments - refer to letter to the Community and Economic Development Director dated June 13, 1997 (Attachment - D) ISSUES UNRESOLVED: Director's Note: Tin section of the report is to request Planning Commission input/resolution of unresolved issues Unresolved issues are conditions of approval which reflect either City Codes, rmewmg agency comments, and/or development revww'condmons applicant has not agreed to, and staff has no authority to waive, or staff does not feel comfortable wceptmg applicant's sohition. 'Iliese issues are the ones the Planning Commission should be most concerned with. Other project items the Plannmg Commission should try to understand are the facts which underlined staff resolutions through the development review process, and try as much as possible to compliment the procem two main issues associated with the applicant's proposal, is the reduction of square footage and usion of single story housing units into an immediate neighborhood of 2 story units ranging from 3 to 2,009 square foot housing units Per the Housing Analysis outlined earlier, the smaller units single story units may have an impact on the immediate neighborhood, which Diversified Pacific nes, Inc disagrees with. They state their marketing plan requires a few smaller units The rmation generated from the analysis and the applicant's good faith effort to increase the product ne footage is just enough for Staff not to recommend denial. However, it is important to stress the 1 for a balanced community and how one neighborhood affects that balance of housing mix of the as a whole The City of Grand Terrace has few areas left for construction of new residential development. The project location area as well as the remaining undeveloped land in the Honeyhills subdivision are the Iasi remaining areas in the City desirable for larger homes The City currently has an abundant amount of medium sized housing units which are in good condition, and those that are in some state of disrepair or vacant are currently eligible for the City's Housing Rehabilitation program. Because this area is so desirable for larger homes, it is imperative that the proposed project be amended to reflect the need for a l glanced community As ix, the project does not benefit the City as a whole and it negatively impacts the local neighborhood 9 tyL, The project shall be constructed in accordance with Site and Architecture design as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board on September 4,1997 The project shall be consist of the following (Option as approved by the Planning Commission and City Council) a) Accept Optional Bonus Rooms as proposed by Diversified Pacific Homes, Inc , and b) Eliminate two (2) 1,353 square foot housing units (Plan 102), and revise proposed housing mix by creating two (2) additional 1,593 square foot units (Plan 103), and c) The two (2) ramming proposed 1,353 square foot single story housing units (Plan 102) shall be located on separate streets (one on Lark Street and one on Kingfisher Street), and d) Include a bonus room in the house base package, at a minimum in three (3) of the proposed Plan 103 (1,593 square foot) All plans shall be consistent in terms of property Imes, easement locations and dunensrons, and other measurements Minor changes or clarifications may be approved by the Community Development Department All building materials to match submitted materials board, and as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board 2 Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Building and Safety/Public Works memorandum to the Community Development Director dated June 19, 1997 (Attachment - A) Compliance with all recommendations listed in the City Engineers memorandum to the Community Development Duector dated June 10, 1997 (Attachment - B) 4 Compliance with all recommendations listed in the California Department of Forestry and Fu+e Protection memorandum to the Community Development Department dated June 17, 1997 (Attachment - C) 5 Compliance with all recommendations listed in the Riverside Highland Water Company letter to the Community Development Dmctor dated June 13,1997 (Attachment - D) 6 Payment of Traffic Aitigation Fee whenever the fee is installed by the City of Grand Terrace, in proportion to amount of trips generated by the development (range is $80 00 - $ 150 00/unrt) (when contacted by Staff in the future) 7 Any significant expansion or changes of use shall be reviewed by the appropriate City agencies Additional permits or amendments to the Site and Architectural approval may be necessary 8 Applicant shall provide a front vard landscape and nn¢ation plan for Community Development Department and Building and Safety approval price to mwance of any building permits (two (2) front yard trees shall be installed on each lot) 9 In the event roof top mechanical equipment is necessary, it shall be located at a distance from 11 c submitted by A1Giawez. Planner by, l zia aterassi, munity and Economic Development Director s. A - Building and Safety/Public Works memorandum B - City Engineers memorandum C - California Department of Forestry and Fine Protection memorandum D - Riverside Highland Water Company letter E - Onginal Conditions of Approval for SP-85-10 (9/12/85) H - Zoning Map I - General Plan Map J - Specific Plan Location Map K - Survey Area Map L - Community and Economic Development Housing Analysis M - Diversified Pacific Homes Market Information N - Resolution O - Letters from Neighbors 1 - Plans 2 - Terrace Hills Tract Specific Plan lm ,61\. \planning\sa\sa9702 pc 13 22705 Barton Road Grand Terrace 1forma 92313-5295 Civic Center (909) 824-6621 Fax (909) 783-7629 Fax (909)783-2600 )n R Matteson Mr — Dan Buchanan Maya Pro Tcn*m Herman thilkey Jim Singley ,ee Ann Garcia Caoaial Akin mas J Schwab city Man - FL r MEMORANDUM 12-8 5273 TO Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director Virgil Barham, Director of Building and Safety/ Public Works FROM William H Addington, City Engineer 1 DATE June 10, 1997 SUBJECT File No SP-85-10-A1, SA97-02 Tract 13050 Application for amendment of SP85-10 for new product design for 28 lots tract by Diversified Pacific Homes Please be advised that I have no comments regarding the requested changes However, pnor to issuance of building permits, a revised precise grading plan will be required My field review of the site found that the existing drainage facilities should be cleaned of soil and weeds WHA/cma ATTACHMENT - B City Engineer's Memorandum to CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND s ..� FIRE PROTECTION COUNTY SERVICE AREA 31 IRE PROTECTION PLANNINO !OLNTY OOVERNMMT CENTER 85 NORTH ARROWHEAD AYENVE, THIRD FLOOR AN BERNARDINO, CA 9241 S4186 S09) 387.4213 0 PAX (909) 387-3021 FIRS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ++i� • , Pq T- A -Ai= AM91 r Location, c — vS� 0 17 I:flr Fim Dept. Ref. No- _ trn_ tr r� ,• lit �t1 FOLLOWING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: slee inapeadon Anal is required to verify conditions of approval have been met J.dvate road maintenance, including but not Amlted to Wng and snow removal, shall be . Written documentation shaft be submitted to the Are department haft judsfton. fire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with a minimum paving wkM of 20) feet F-Z thter systems designed to most the required fire flow of tttils development shall pe U"Iby Ow Res department having WsdMon. The developer shall furnish the fife department two (2) copies of the water system improvement plan for approval. Vat Wterre Abgn be jljWW and agga&W by thg fire deggrrtrWAt gM IQ.ally.ItAfft.QW&VAM ewe- The trod fire flow shall be determined by the appropriate calculations, using ihs San 8emardino rity'Gulde For ft Detatdaift of Firo Flan" Water systems stall haw minimum glght (8) mains, sbc (0) Inch laterals, six (0) inch rheas. Flow required i �QPM Q 20 psi. Tested at_,., _�+4psV1 20 pel. r 40 e Three F 111re Dept. Ref. No i approved tumaround shall be provided at the end of tal j of more in loop Cut-de-sao length shall not excee a in the development code and approved by the Are chief. ) See attac"d (lagram of approved turnarounds. t FOLLOWNG CONDITIONS SMALL ME COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: 9.ft street address shall be posted wfth a flinlmum of tour (4) irxrl9 numbers, visible from and dung the hour of darkness the numbers shah be low voRtKe, autoMUC* rliy Illuminated. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the in acroadancs with the Uniform Fire Coda. building setbacks exceed one hundred (100) feet from the road, addttlonal lour (4) inch v shall be displayed at the property access, non-•1'puminated, but contracting their K e 0 F•9A. Pr{or to Anal hwpecllon, commrdal or industrial buildings shell post street gasses with a mirdmur°n of eight (6) Inch nurnbem Street Wdresses shad be visible hm the stm4t and during the hours of darimeas, they d*H be outomrwtlally Iflumimted. 1llthere building setbacks exceed one hundred (100) fief from the roadway, addltfonal non- tllu r'inated, contrasting abc (0) Inch numbers 0 A be dioplayed at tie pro" aoQ"s rentanoa. O F-10. chirrM used in conjunoW with any Rrapiaa or any heating appilana in wvhkh sol uld KUM Is used shall be maintained wfih an approved spank arresW.; A $hall 134 conatrWed at stainM$ steel, copper, a brass, w n GWY*nfUd wlrr M (11) Sao WjAIr um of Ihree-elghths (316) Inch trinirm n to ors -halt (112) Inch ma*nurn opertr%r a per County Cods 3381. The mesh "bs visible ton►the ground. No dory a Wnd. z development and each phase thereof sW have two (2) p 4� aces der,�� W" , and for routes of a c" wwhich wild solely Randle evocuefts so required by the Development Code. O F-13. GW roadvrays which exasd one hundred Ofty (160) feet in len0" be approved by department having JudWWJM and shad be exuded 4o wvithin ON hundred Afty 050) feet of, and shall glue msonebte acoses to adi portlor►s of tee exterior waft of ItA first IWY of eny aaa betwee . An ac a r rid the bur rq k uao m of 30 pence& VIW* grade bet!the � std be p�W a required and app�Poved by roadd can not be provided, a firs proton system tee Orr deputnot 4- - p F 3. approved fin department lock Is required on all Sates. 9 any auforreba e*rfc etas are used, lIW require an approved lock *Wkh. Contact this silks fbr lock • ips Flo PECIAL NON-STANDARD CONDITION& 4 6ENSON, UrIN C11N/ IRIlOf" Fire Dept Ref. No 19,fZz v Bo a FEES TYPE Afoount.►t td •a Deb _ r U f0. �TF `°�u...� Q�Q�P V June 13, 1997 1450 E Washington St • Colton, CA 92324 4696 • (909) 825-4128 FAX (909) 825.1715 Ms. Patrizia Materassi Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Re: File No SP-85-10-A1, SA-97-02 and E-97-04 Dear Ms. Materassi; RECEIVED JUH 2 31997 The water main system and service lines are in and the meter boxes have been set on the above referenced project If , as noted, the driveway approaches all remain the same, no changes will be required. Prior to water meters being set and sufficient shares of water stock must be inspection fees must also be paid. EPM/ss water made available to each lot, obtained. The meter set fees and Sincere Eugene P. McMeans General Manager ATTACEffAXNT -D Riverside Highland Water Company Letter M �• �hV� �- a5 ul� � ! (b) Injurious to property or improvemeent$ in the neighborhood or within the City. and (2) Specific Plan No. 85-10 is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan, and ( 3 ) Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of Chapter 18 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, are made part of this approval. SECTION 5. Approval of Specific Plan - That , having reviewed the tindings'Pthis City Council 'o t e nv ronmenta Of ficer fficer and the testa given, does hereby approve Tentative Tract No. ew 0/Specif1c Phan No. 85n10 subject to the mitigation measures and the conditions as follows; adopt the Negative Declaration, and instruct the City Clerk to issue a Notice of Determination: CONDITIONS (1) That Applicant and/or property owners shall comply with all ?� r applicable City ordinances, resolutions, Conditions of Approval, and additional Planning Commission conditions. (2) Approval of this Tentative Tract No. 13050/Specific Plan #a. 8S'-10 sha11 expire, if not used, one year frot the data of approval unless application for extension is Bade and approved Prior to expiration of the one-year period. (3) Approval of this application constitutes a Specific Plan approval only and does not constitute approval of a sign permit ng Permit, building permit, or any other permit required by the City. (4) A development Any lly c tray is constructed on the Subject Sites shall substantially comply with the standards and conceptual lan . submitted and approved as Specific Plan No. p 85-10. (5) The Developer shall pay their fair share of School Impaction Fees prior to pulling a Building Permit, if these fees are established by the Colton Unified School District and approved by the City Council. . 2 - T.J AUSTYK INC. 500 N. Newport Boukvard Suite 201 Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 642 6659 October 10, 1985 Mr. Joe Kicak, Planning Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Subject: Tentative Map No. 13050 Specific Plan No. 85-10 Dear Joe: Enclosed herewith please find one copy of the executed Conditions of Approval applicable to the subject. If i can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, l ,J Wi iam J. Storm WJS/ejs Enclosure ' Aa W1 13. Obtain a letter of non-laterfereoce from any utility company that say have rights of easement within the property boundaries. The letter suet be obtained prior to issuance of building permits. Subject property shall not be occupied and/or used for purposes applied for until the following conditions have been set: 14. The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed is accordance with the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, the California Administrative Code, and plans approved by the governing fire protection authority. 15. The planting and permanent irrigation system (a) shall be installed per approved landscape pals. lb. S�reeai" shall pro r ec , nsist of 17. AN aroun a Pe ter o 0� s (b) oo( hi d era v on 1S. �. v A faithfull performance bond in an amount %equal to the /o .estimated cost of uncompleted required Improvements. pins �. the cost of administratioo, shall be posted with the Eity Building and Engineering Department, if the requiral Improvements have Dot been completed at the time the occupancy permit is requested. Is. Prior to any occupancy. a Certificate of Final Completioa shall be issued by the City Building Department, after which, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Services for a Certificate of Occupancy. 19. Any phasing ahsll be submitted to the planning Department for review and approval. 20. Prior to a Public Hearing for approval before the City Council, all inaccuracies in the test of the Specific Plan shall be corrected. I as the owner of the property described above. I an aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth herein. It is further under- stood that all of the aforementioned conditions which require installation of improvement shall be completed in a manner aatisfac- tore to the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace and shall not be deed complete until approved and accepted as completed by said Department. 12-4.6MA2-9. so:3 Cbadations of Approval PAM 3 W ' � 1 13. Obtain a letter of non-interference from any utility company that may have rights of easement within the property boundaries. The letter must be obtained prior to issuance of building permits. Subject property shall not be occupied and/or used for purposes applied for until the following conditions have been sett 14. 15. The planting and permanent irrigation system (a) shall be installed per approved landscape peln. 16. Screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project, consisting of a six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall, per Section 18.48.060 (J). 17. A faithfull performance bond in an amount equal to the estimated cost of uncompleted required Improvements, plus the cost of administration, shall be posted with the City Building and Engineering Department, if the required improvements have not been completed at the time the occupancy permit is requested. 18. Prior to any occupancy, a Certificate of Final Completion shall be issued by the City Building Department, after which, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Services for a Certificate of Occupancy. 19. Any phasing shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 20. Prior to a Public Bearing for approval before the City Council, all inaccuracies in the text of the Specific Plan shall be corrected. I as the owner of the property described above. I as aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth herein. It is further under- stood that all of the aforementioned conditions which require installation of improvement shell be completed In a meaner satisfac- tory to the Planning Department of the City of Crand Terrace and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by said Department. eIGNATURN OF APPLICAM OR AGM DAT't 12-9.6006/12-8.S033 Conditions of Approval PAGE 2 SIC , 1 • 11. Submit plans for review and approval of sewer extensions crossing the California Aquaduct. 12. A bond will be required, prior to final tract approval for all work in the public right -of -ray, and easements. A grading bond will be required prior to the commencement of grading operations. 13. Construct retaining walls as required. 14. All sewer bond assessments and other fees, as indicated in Preliminary Title Report, shall be paid prior to final approval of map. 15. Install standard street name and traffic control signs as approved by City Engineer. 16. The developer or his Engineer shall furnish the Fire Department with two copies of voter system improvement plans. The Fire Department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. 17. A program of slope and erosion control shall be undertaken by the developer to preclude damage to the site and downstream property during heavy storm runoff. especially during the construction stage. Any damage encountered will be the responsibility of the developer. 18. There are existing utilities, such as irrigation systems and power lines on the site that are not shown on the tentative map. These will have to be relocated in accordance with the requirements of the owner. 19. The existing 60 ft. Edison easement located 100th south of lark Street may cause a problem for the City in the future. The Edison Cospany is not fee owner of the property. but it cannot be used for a building site. In all probability the parcels will be sold every five years for delinquent taxes. Recommendstiomt Include the Edison easement property as part of the adjacent lot. 20. Developer shall have a fee ownership of all property vithia Tract boundary prior to recording of final map. QC-3 a ' 7,6f Trea,strri=stios system sai landscaping-sMlrW as specified,, - is the City of Crud `Teritce Standards for tree pLsntia�g. n daveloper-Awl "Ift aim -oil landscaping until 1g ja or4,uF,1*bw XW.AM VAWAP WATER 1. Construct water system in accordance with plans approved by Riverside Highland Water Coepany with fire hydrant size type and location approved by Firs Departsent. SEWER 1. Construct server system in accordance with platy to be approved by the City of Grand Terrace. DRAINAGE 1. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off -site tributary drainage flov around or through the site in a Manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstreaa properties. The engineer shell submit a hydrologic report for the development. 2. The drainage report shall contain detailed plans for intercepting the drainage from the East side of the Tract and conveying it to existing drainage facilities with considerstios of the potential drainage problems at the meat ends of Cardinal and Lark Strut. M. w-? for Office of Planning review tad approval. Said Laadacape Plan shall include the following: 1. ,Tbe required slope planting. Slope planting shall be required for the surface of all cut slopes more than fire (S) feet in height and fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height. Said slopes shall be protected against damge by erosion by planting with grass or ground corer plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed tea (10) feet on centers= or trees. spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on centerss or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover Plants- The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the $oil and clizatie Trees 102 15 gal.; bOx S gal.f 503 1 gal. Shrubs 20Z S gal.; 802 1 gal. Groundcover 1002 coverage. 2. The required street trees. 3. All required walls. All decorative walls shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback. split block face. columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. CO Three (3) copies of an irrigation plan shall be submitted for Office of Planning review and approval when slope plantins Is required. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an approved system of irrigations designed to cover all portions of the slope. A functional test of the system may be required. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer ®til the transfer to individual ownership. All irrigatioa systems, where required,, shall be designed on an individual lot basis. d. All landscaping and irrigation showa on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their completion. 0. PL-2 1 REFERRAL MEMO FILE NO. 12-8.6006 12-9.5033 DATE : May 28, 1965 FROM City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 825-7503 TO COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL D I STRICT 1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, CA 92324 SUBJECT. Application for Conditional Use Permit 6 Site 6 Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract map No. 13050, Terrace Hills Tract. 44.3 gross acres 176 detached Single Family Residences, Specific Plan 85-10 The above referenced application has been filed with the City Planning Director. Any planning comment you may have should be received in this office no later than JUNZ S, 1985 for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. NOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease- ments across the property proposed for development. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the proposed: IM COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS REQUESTED BUILDERS FEES. APPROVAL SHOULD INCLUDE PAYWNT *MN BUILDING PERMITS ARE SECURED . 7 ROBERT S. RICH, DIRECTOR -ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1 NAME CoLIVN JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (714) 824-4109 Department (Please Z ent y Agency) P one ^ � 1 REFERRAL MEMO FiLe N0. 12-8.6006 DATE s May 2e, 196S 12-0.5033 FROM City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak RECtrylp At 22365 Barton Road, Suits 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 JA 141985 92S-7S03 TO: COMM TIRE W RDDI KKM 1 ASMTM 3800 Sierra Ilan, San Bernardino, ch 92410 SUBJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit i Site t Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Kap No. 130S0, Terrace Hills Tract. 44.3 gross acres 176 detached Single taxUy Residences, Specific Plan 85-10 The above referenced application has been filed with the, City Planning Director. Any planning comment You may have, should be received in this office no later than 3X*s S, 196S for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made,, pleas* contact the department Ive calling the above, telephon* number or write referring to file number. NOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INYORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or eas*- ments across the property proposed for development. Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follow regarding the proposeds I Roadways shall have a miniaasm vertical clearance of thirteen feet six inures (13' 6•). Minimum 24' width; turns based upon 47' radius. R b raxo Ord shall be provided at the end of each roaday, and shall be aPprOved by the fire department. Based upon 47' radius. Arad r ainterw ce, including but not limited to gradtrq and snow removal, shall be provided for. All fire -protection rater systems that fall within the jurisdiction of this fire department shall be approved by this office prior to the inatallation of said systems. The following are mirdma standards for yam proposed development. Hydrant locations to be determined with water system approval. & SSystea Standards Fire flow Duraticn Hydrant spacing S. Distribution System Mains RiRiser C. Fire Rydrarfu 1250 (;.pm, —ba3— feet (s) 6 inch minima inch minbm �► 6 inch with - 2- irc h outlets tIonal Standard threads and with 4 inch pxper Street valve _ 6 _ inch gate ALL fire flow its are over and above the average daily armmptim of water, and the minitnm residual pressure shall be tr nett' (20) poi. The required fire flan ahall be determined by appropriate calaulatiCM, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services office (L90), %j de foc the Daterminatian of Required Fire Flag, In areas without water-sesvinq utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based cn NFPA Pamphlet Not 1231, "Rater Supplies for &*urban and ral Fire Fighting Pu. A storage reservoir oust be provided for each parcel; Witment• capacity to be maintained shall be deteanined by the firs Zhe developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department with two copies of rater system inVrvvement plans where fire protection water systece are required. K»►tain Fire Lone building regulations specified in San Bernardino Canty Oardinarrct 2475 shall be strictly enf reed. ( TtttKt ■IUlt (OrY,�ITt PUB ) .... PUB RH , !c R I �zo ZONING DISTRICTS QRJI •!ll617L I(31x■ M DIf ISCI 0 /T Q Ri•!0 r[tr OV x,tl r t ttl( rarttr r3x,l.L7stcI QR1-10 LN 7t,sur s ■C (r.nll. as,t■ L os-c QR1•i 1 ,Cy( Tu•lLf I($ xt I.0 D f I Cr i aRl l0Y KDIW xtsltr I(fix,t at 7 f I + • n ' a Ri rutty 0(tsliT I((7Klliq ois tttt O148/ ILTO• &"$ PWFK ItV A' .Y rG( / t7 KT r Q Ct tulK '04(u fatttT %p^ [] oo t-w.Ktc6" •I.IC •f ..b QYi All tKT(D ra. raCT I./ DrfTICr QY= i�f704 ilr llT pus I`I` ° Ttm,T cs I v bCT CITY OF GRAND TERRACE OVERLAY DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICT MAP C7 IV flow III DTMAI II:I/lc! QA$ •CLCrLTN,L MIRu YI72KT ATTACHMENT - H Zorung Map M-15 Zdl— E-o F071 Lai 47; Co �17 E7 AL 54 No L] IN CMy d drnd TOrleoe CanM+rY tlrld E,00rnnl0 Oereb�pawr DopOtrrtwd fleer Pion Me. TeW of p1m WOM f 40- f o"W ►M omm of Mdea Numb" of Mrre. oww pmw Pbr mw TOW of p6m unite. sgmm %~ Nw bw of Mode. IlemMw of McMe. Olro� Flow Rwr MOr TeW of Pion math Mrwo to~ IlrwYw W bede. mmo w of MdMe. a -RAW Row run no. TOW Pka tattle. $*Mo lteete0e Mmm w of Mede. Mudrw N bwm Ow"w fbw Rwt No. TOW plr W*& 000- to~ Okad w of trade. 1Mred w of Mlles Housing Analysis - Total Units &Nwy Loatlon Oouet Em at— Toneoe In M Rt 7 2 HmakV r I I Abnp UM b"O Of Okro Mw"n (9OO Athdwd M *P) Ohrwsflod PedMO Irttoe (prepeed) Lark 0t A KWV Ww ( evYod • of 0/2effln TO 130&10 Mb 1 14 Tr 1305" lob 27-29 40 Tr 13000e toll 13-22 TwrO NNM TJ. Are" ExImWV Trod 13000 Spedft Pbn41d10 FWW Crest TJ Arelyn Tr 13050-1 2 3 4 Speeft Ptr►ee-10 fSn" Oeretopff-d Tr 14471 Pnrle CL Twrew New TJ Am" Tr 13200 Tr 13206.1 Rmm vfty a Robin Vfty OrMftn Homes ToW uric Tr 9773 Tr 0772 a_ 02 4 12 1 + 14 1351 + ISM 1 a + 1466 21 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 + 1 1700 44 + 11 1900 31 2 1e 2 9 Iwo 1 1 3 leee 4 1620 3 1769 law- 4 2 2 29 2 20pp 19 04 13 2000 42 3 23 IJM7 2000 1794 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 4 190e 32 20 201e 4 3 low 2e APPRWO ePg1p Mm ou.. anw - r-• � � 1e P"6 1 44-- -- 112® .Y 4 �ii No ' `y+ /• r tom. "•+, r.. � 4 u ++ .+ t , ltif� • 1 } 7� -Y 1�. "• l4 vV�•k �rF�;,''rly `t r 4 � kt�M{`�I•; ri�rn �l 1 f .� lit yfArLL�.rwY l<�'.�1 r'% .. 4 Vi•17 k '. , ( h f r:, 4 4 a.Y 7�1T�^T `,�p=1}Y,;l Ol 14 • ii rl' Y J.1�, *�, 1 Housing square fwLage analysis SE City TABLE 3 - Analysis Scenario Area without the proposed 28 lots (I a never approved) Unit Square Footage Units In area without 28 units, Units In area with the proposed 28 units from Divem fl. 1351 of 14 18 1400 of 21 21 1600 of 17 17 1600 of 26 37 1700 of 44 44 1800 of 91 104 2000 of 1 1011 101 Total 314 TABLE 4 - Analysis Scenario Area without the proposed 28 lots (i a never approved) 342 Unit Square Footage Percentage of units without 28 units Percentage of units with the proposed 28 from Diversified 1351 of 44586 5263157895 1400 of 66879 6140350877 1500 of 54140 4970760234 1600 of 82803 10 81871345 1700 of 140127 12 86549708 1800 of 289809 30 40935673 2000 of 1 3216561 29 53216374 Total REFER TO CHART ON PAGE 2 SHEET 3 1000000 100 units Page 1 Sheet3 �r Housing square footage analysis SE City TABLE 5 - Median units in the study area Freauencv Unit Square Footage Unit Frequency without 28 lot Unit Frequency with Diversified Proposal Unit Frequency with existing Specific Plan 1351 sf 14 18 14 1400 st 21 21 21 1500 st 17 17 17 1600 st 26 37 27 1700 st 44 44 44 1800 st 91 104 100 2000 st 101 101 119 Total 314 342 342 Median without 28 units Unit Frequency with Diversified Proposal Unit Frequency with existing Specific Plan Median Square F!9 1800 1800 1800 Median Score 157 171 171 REFER TO CHART ON PAGE 2 SHEET 4 Page 1 Sheet4 Housing square fo ` e analysis SE City TABLE 6 - Average Square Footage Unit Square Footage Total square footage without 28 lots Total square footage with Diversified Proposal Total square footage with existing Specific Plan 1351 18914 24318 18914 1400 29400 29400 29400 1500 25500 25500 25500 1600 41600 59200 43200 1700 74800 74800 74800 1800 163800 187200 180000 20001 2020001 02000 238000 Total 556014 Total Units 314 602418 342 609814 342 Average square footage Average square footage Average square footage with without 28 lots Diversified Proposal existln2 Specific Plan 1770 75 1761 46 178308 REFER TO CHART ON PAGE 2 SHEET 6 Page 1 Sheets Housing square( }ge analysis SE City TABLE 7 - Square footage mixture required for proposal to be compatible In the area Impact on Terrace Hills - T J Austyn Tr 13050 Plan Recommended number of units Adjustments made to proposal Plan 102 = 1353 sf 2 removed 2 Plan 1400 = 1400 sf 0 no units proposed 0 Plan 103 & 1600 = 1600 sf 22 removed 1 Plan 104 = 1714 sf 0 add 12 Plan 1800 = 1868 sf 37 removed 11 Plan 2000 = 2009 sf 24 add 2 Total Units 85 IUnit sauare footage ITntal ilndn withmit rthannac to CnanitIn DI IT^#�l ..nit.-Rs.,.1...--- 1351 sf 14 12V 1400 sf 21 21 15W sf 17 17 1600 of 27 26 1700 sf 44 56 1800 sf 100 89 2000 sf 119 121 Jq.z KQ Unitsquare footage Percentage of units without changes to S Percentage of units after recom'd 1351 sf 40936 35088 1400 sf 61404 61404 1500 sf 4 9708 49708 1600 sf 78947 76023 1700 sf 128655 163743 1800 sf 292398 260234 2000 sf T__1 34 7953 35 3801 1 WMI 100 REFER TO CHART ON PAGE 2 AND 3 SHEET 6 and compare with charts on sheet 2 iWel changes Div Pac Homes Project area Constant Recommended Proposed units unit distribution 4 2 0 0 11 10 0 12 13 2 0 2 28 28 )e = Average = 1657 5714 1674 7143 1= Median = 1600 1714 Page 1 Sheet6 w, M r r:'° 1 ltJ!1 `•rt 'r ti �y ( 7 IeI t; ..�lt %'r1Y r�{LiSYi`,,• �. t 14q d\j \ fJ I✓�IJ ,f.r.I /p: i! 4 „!rj„I t I..`lrI//11r�)ht GL�� yt !'d "' I I'1 ) - 'IArlf tivl ��ll tT'I40 f�nlf }F y tA. Xn 1 �yNi('!r ><�.^ I 1 .11• r t 1 t IJ 7��i�4i1w4+y t?` Irrti }'(14v;�iiltM1r`� rll, ' �• e r .t y { 1� . I • r d 1 �� v i . r •tt n t 1�'itlr lyyxryy/iJ.��,* , { �I 1 l.Ir 1 , '1 •-.Tj�A'.� I • 1 .+,, YLC'l��i ll� r.; y y t a a \. „ NN I'er�iJV'!J JI[ a I -1 'r �• t I Y h i y :• Y r �++' \��'1 y 1� 4, .. 1 S tt riiYl 'CAI •l4y 1,1 �II�i..�ytlwr„�,N; Sr�'7'+l yy /�'I.• -,: r.,•, N � k �* `. fir. * ''Jr �' .,� t Y Y a afA . ,� t. `r • 1 4 i 4V+�.. -. rr 1 y]�NI f r7N _r ' uY47��t i}Z� r� �< <� 1. CItIy1 y+�•�r,.y 1'ljtd / K' h1 . M�y I j , � I +Ilt.y j. 7+ n.t �ll� . 1 r a, 11Y. "�Ih��l�r:: �.INI •W1,. 1� ,m\ I w' r /tt r.,— I,1,/�/1.pyn •{�(�tjyy�7y 'R'S�%[��N'(�'Ir�1�"\41 I i� JP�'4,/ y yl / {It� 1� 71� �4 I C. � � ,�( i t rV �1 ^ 4 y F+7 ;' til 'S!'1� Y It s 1 „il , .en'fli'Mr l t! S! {„v 1 .f i 1 i y� 1 1 ✓t •Lv t 1 {n r f -. {`;,yf Nt ,Fw'4 • (� vy, •ri r �1.�V ' 'i t 1 1 r�.jM'S I4I i \ u f �.i •.1 'I t fw, •L •y ul'. /� 1 �y.1 . 1 a� 't Ir Y �' YhI T,f� 1 1'4(YI Al yt Yy,� +t d �1(I J 4 .A Y�14t L f r•. Y a 5 I Y• 1 G n t h J \y 1 i. 17��(( rII ! r t ttl ril \wfi ..,1dYif,If ., i r ,w� 4:4SIJ,A �I..1YN r"y'ti !Yi{'kRr.�ili JI 4�' 1'ry ti ,I ti r •ip� r r �, r. iy.! •wit•S"S �a 71"t'r\ 11nt j y I�'i �'f"\r Y• i • •, ' ,•I%/'ir! 1�•,I '' 1, .''• •1.1. •' ••lull r„I •1 � \, \ ,1 t I. , . t .•', �4tr 1•. 1' � N 3t � C:1 . �� Ij� 1, fF '}L.n., y, { r J ' , ti'' . 1, •',::4•'.w.iryw.iG15,YJ t f' r r }irr' p • .y y "' I I, a` ' i N•,. J der. �' 7 1 { �t�i y t;i r4rr71, 'a, t t J'llt, { 1 ..r r.� f 1��•,•� r Qt r 5`t,�,f,��+r� 1 •11`>�'��5t'L •'.�.I�I T, r� 1 r '� i rt J yl _ 1 � l�.f� - Mr. y'A 1 � :J.: f•�fhl} -tl 1 1 t(,! u%,�rt Jixi'r)}'� ti!�'fh ' • r� r r 1 'r 1 r jiLj,x / , ' 1.. t ,rf � 1•l• ,, J 4 rt M�'Sx�Jih'Y�l r,JV fY h • . it .• - f •t r r •. +CJ. a r r,{'^J� I wIJA4'M-�J7►A1 '!r. 1,. �•v X 4t- v �d r r •"'. � , � .�. � i .ui i J ,y�'r cif a v Y: l�v " r '•. v ird 5} , r i i 1 1 r; IJ t4. ,yOx 1 ! IIti/, ly, (r•.,, ��*'`.,•"fl a�,o 'ltarrrt 1 Itv:t•{�'•' !.tif4 J��, it ,:!$��Itd f�ilJ'tttt/t i �'�'. r7r'a��t ]li a + i � � i�t4 '� °75 y�. I �i, I Iv ,, r • ^• + t !t ht rn � 4�rf0l,tt '.•Ni(r, '1(�ti•� ilc� _ r 4 ''�{,'�i' Nyi ,N t r 4 ,, F r • r yA'y''c+111T �, •. ! ;MtihhC Y.r.�./ f,T�'� l • �,. tv. .t 1i 11. 1 ,..• f , .'�� tk� �• a klXl. 1ifw JS, yx t�; +{ ,w, J' 11 Via,. � f,. M ♦' r. v{, �, t i'r�li f� . t au "� ( 1 "Ju�r , tic I ;y''h J��,if�xtt1yr•, s, r/ ,..y 4 • i i 41 x� , t '. °PI'�Gkr r 4r.�n y t,w .Ji.ltitl �irw •r i. ai�Sj�{1�S'J►�Inwzxi�'k"i+kJt r7lJ..t,{�liii 1 .1 '4••'t,"4 .ty�;. •,.' a, it , -� n. •r fyntrl�ltl��•ewq,yr.�,{7• �r t+�'F{, �y ' ..y,r � �'• 1 rr �� 1 1 k xli . r .A.,_ ;rl ux �,�.,, r •` .� J,'tJ 5151 ,+ Alt, " - ',11, '.-, �F, ', ! Lip L!q, ""LIN ;Z;4 Pr rI: I,.p z rl G'• � Ay.�fo'�•r„t•.4,�I" W .c�Wv,q III �t l•.r ti• \i �u�if•, rlAl�'"t,,•.4 WfM AIr' ��,�j''f�ni.`iy� TJr�n r; ..� 1 !' I „ i r9r/ ii l q �f,v "I�+, •, r '�r)41 I .� y, W' y t { t fr trl 1� 4•h ��fir i ,,}�•l i'�' U 91•'fl1 I�* S i t �t a rMl n f 1 r � 1 �• -u. h'rt'1 rl �'�y tr ,I ,q r.I�� ' t'�: � i�� a d a n +tl w ,, wftiik 3134 GArG }.'yy�'. •J ' � a.c "".r{,• `.r�^•, ?i{'I �;�. �•, I ti �' \ � � h1 *t ". A�vw!�•r h .,, , � ., i i r� �i.� ��r hil'i i 1. ,'Ct'tl� A�'t' � •:l" ��4'+�„fj��G4�u � 1hntjyr,�t�u<' It < n f, i.�I ��I�i /'h �� ,-'4• ,.� 1/1Af , rf F {•� .il a i , 1 r.�l >'113' fE♦lil! II .• 1•� �, '1u u }1'1�,;('�YR: �r ,iJ.. ; �71 MV I' 1 ',1 �1,�v hf / !', r �, j• I 1 ��F'�,1 lI1?;I l 'r.1'►�'it , Ij" l� •�'+ ,rig I , �j:ir tiYHHH...'W Y'k�- >�� yi" ar''I•" 1t' v', 11 f t!n '•, %o\4i1 ' • '�M} v�,J u i , 1 al ,}{:,.�1 1 1�'T li r U. �I i .lCp /'fit null' t uY � I, �,�aRf7r14'r' r wu � flirly�t�i'C�~t 41�J(II� N. 'j i ttAt•. \ o •. ai.�t� n..t4K �y �4 _ , r it'h11Mi qu,,,c .NI r•.M "�. Y7 ��v J'.VA"{ f !) (�y �S ry'i1�\l 8r t, ?•A`1'•�1{•�,i�''",J,/a}i "1 f3/ � - � I r 'G'Y Q �* � , I n � „Y rrlN'< ;,r 7 �4 7•l/�ii •1 ' tr ,.p vA .rf ww F r•7 !\rl }«)4'<Nr 7 t l t. ' ° i'ltl � �' '�5-f V.'•+: ti J�I�ri 'M r j'"'dN ,a r. .w �•tl,f;. . n�sLd'.r,�" 4" ,yFty,r'�'SIL`�-��:Y `�.��Snt '•r � o,� '+c,. • ` ii r' tt' '' . Mk..Y fL ate- .r,. , ., .. I ,,'�11� 1. " h � • -I In. G,..,,LtKl�n,, � 1 i�lrliti ] 4""` � : ,,'�li � if r �':•� �� ti Ys � M �1,rl�c •. Ile C; 4 ,r` ,I• I \, - /. ,t11 11 I .W , ior,. Ir' tin4 I-.J' ,... . •I•'�fa• A�r! \ -.,•. Il ,rI r4 ,`' j',, I , !� \� , , 't ' 1. _ ., �` 'lJ 4 . '• I i 4�h\ 7 �,• .i l ;• I tc• � yhn11 r 1 ✓' �� " — -• - �'•f'l, 1 w 11141 /J.JJ(' t IY DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC LTD R rc �u 1 B 1997 July 16, 1997 Ms Patnzia Niaterassi Community Development Director C,ty of Grand Terrace 22-95 Barton Road Grand Terrace, C k 92313 5_?5 Re Ti at t Nu 13050 (28 Lots) Dear Patrizia Many thanks for meeting with Pete Pitassi, Mike HLxson and me to discuss our plans to develop the 28 vacant lots at the above referenced tract in Grand Terrace Under a separate cover Mr FExson is sending your office all the data plus renderings of the houses that support the fact that our plans for these 28 lots actually bnng increased value to the neighborhood, even though the plans we are proposing are smaller than some of the homes built in the area We understand that you would Like us to build a larger house on this site, but as I explained to you, with the aNerage resale of a 2000 square foot house m this area at about S 162,000, we could not afford to offer this same house, given the residual lot values, for less then $190,0001 Even at this pnce, these homes would not include the same high spec level we plan for the product we are proposing By offering a smaller house for 20% more in sales price per square foot, we are actually supporting the existing prices in taus area, and conceivably unprovirng the opportunity for prices to increase on the larger square foot homes that are presently in this neighborhood When people pay more for our homes on a per square foot price, those buyers who µant larger homes would be willing to pay more, gi`,en the existing property is in good condition, etc I admire your commitment to Grand Terrace and its community pride, and understand your desire to do anything you can from your position to help your city I hope you understand what we are proposing is our best effort given the economic and market conditions 10390 Commerce Center Dnoe Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga I ATTACHMENT - M Telephone (909) 481 1 150 FAX W9) 481 11 _= Diversified Pacific Homes ma_ let lrlfor-rct nn C30ODMAN./,/HIXSON & COMPANY ,X -lton Farkway Suite #158 • Irvine California 92615 • (714) 47-NQ9 - Fax (714) 472.�,6 July 15, 1997 ME ��'G .vis Patnzia Materassi, Community Development Director �g91 `vir Larry A Mainez, Associate Planner PV Cit} of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 SLBJECT TRACT 13050 (28 Lots) Dear Ms Materassi and fir %fainez Thank you for meeting with us this week to discuss our plan for the subject lots As a result of our meeting, we are documenting on behalf of our client, Diversified Pacific Homes Ltd , the market and site analysis conclusions that we used to determine highest and best use analysis of the site, given current market conditions Current Neighborhood Values The attached document, "Grand Terrace Site Review," is a table of values derived from all reported Multiple Listing Service (Realtor) transactions that have occurred during 1996 and 1997, along with all value -reported tax assessor transfers for 1996 and 1997, for Tract 'dumber 13050 (the unmediate neighborhood) You will note a range of values from $123,000 to $161,500, for homes from 1499 to 2045 square feet Significant findings are as follows 1 No significant value trends, multiple sales prices for same -size units, no active listings, all indicating no "floor" on values for larger homes in the area- 2 Resale values lower than cost -to -replace measures 3 No new construction in area for roughly 7 years Proposed Plans Proposed building plans, all within code guidelines, would provide for homes smaller than neighborhood's largest plans, but at substantially higher price -per - square -foot values, with anticipated sales prices at the top of current sales values Current propertyy owners should benefit from the following results Larger homes will sell for prices higher than the smaller new -construction, now that values can be established Current sales prices only reflect the degree of distress of the selling property owner $180 $170 j $160 1 a� p $150 � v.• O N �v a U c� $140 a � $130 rn $120 1 $110 GRAND TERRACE TRACT 13050 July, 1997 LI F] C1 I Un $100 1 1 1 _ I 1 1 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Sire of Homes ,n Squarc Fcct ATTACHMENT - O Letters form neighbors 8 499'> City of Grand Terrace Planning Commission 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Attn Ms Patrizia Materassi Dear Ms Materassi This letter is in response to the Application for Amendment of a Specific Plan for 28 existing lots on Lark St and Kingfis�-.er Rd I am in opposition to the product design change proposed by Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd It is my opinion that any changes to the size of the homes to ce built on these lots would have a negative impact on the immeaiate area and the City of Grand Terrace as a whole The immediate area ad3acent to these lots has the reputation of an area of larger homes This reputation attracts a buyer who require a larger home or who desires live in an area where homes are of a larger square footage This specific area of Grand Terrace has an image of a housing development that offers this category of home I have spoken with several individuals who have shopped for homes in this area because it has the reputation of large spacious homes that are well maintained Changes to the size of homes on these lots may deter these buyers from shopping for property in this area It is my opinion that the Planning Commission should reserve this area for the homeowner who wishes a larger home It is one of the last remaining undeveloped parcels in the City and the long term reputation and image of the City would be well served to maintain the original architectural design for these lots Sincerely, M C'U'U Mark V Cvikota 22815 Kentfield St Grand Terrace, CA 92313 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE OF SAID CITY IN Z-95-01-Al AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM, AMENDING THE ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS: TO MAKE A CORRECTION TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN A MEgIM[UM DISTANCE FROM CERTAIN SENSITIVE USES SUCH AS PARKS, SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, DAY CARE FACILITIES, FREEWAYS AND RESIDENTIAL USES FILED BY THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CO AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is located in the Grand Terrace Redevelopment and WHEREAS, the Community and Economic Development Department has initiated the d amendment as approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment was illustrated in the Febniary 16,1995 Planning emission report and referred to in the March 9,1995 City Council Staff Report, however it madvertently left out of the final text of the ordinance, and �-I WHEREAS, per the authority of CEQA Section 15164 (b), an Addendum to the approved Negative Declaration has be completed and attached to the original Negative Declaration for Ordinance 153, and WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the Grand Terrace General Plan as d by Ordinance 154 associated with the approval of Zoning Code Chapter 18 70, Adult s Regulations, and WHEREAS, the following findings have been set forth in the Staff Report to the City l of the City of Grand Terrace, California. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. FACTS The amendment to the Adult nment QWma= proposal is consistent with the General Plan as amended by Ordinance 154 associated with the approval of Zoning Code Chapter 18.70, Adult Business Regulations Chapter VI of the Grand Terrace General Plan, General Commercial Land Use section states, -portions of the General Commercial (GC) area allow adult business uses " In addition, Chapter VI, Industrial land use section states, "portions of the Industrial (I) area allow business COUNCIL AGENDA 14EII# 7A 4 Section 2 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12 01 a.m on the 31 st day of its adoption Section 3 Postmg. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council Section 4 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 28th day of August,1997 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 1 lth day of September,1997 City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof and of the City Council thereof I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting on the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 11 th day of September, 1997, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Approved as to form John Harper City Attorney LM.hn C W p6l\.1ptannmg wnnq j\zM1a1 wd 3 Brenda Stanfill City Clerk Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE September 11, 1997 SUBJECT SOFTBALL FIELD REHABILITATION PROJECT FUNDING REQUIRED (XX) BACKGROUND: In the hearings for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Budget, staff requested funding for the rehabilitation of the Pico Park Softball Diamond and the Soccer Field at Richard Rollins Park The Council removed these items from the budget with the direction that staff bring these items back at a later date DISCUSSION: U Staff is bringing the request back to the City Council requesting authorization to proceed with a rehabilitation of the Pico Park Softball Field #1 The problems with the field are significant, including numerous ruts and holes caused by gophers, erosion due to the grade of the field and problems with compaction In all, the field is in need of rehabilitation. Specifically, the project proposed will include as follows 1 A survey of the field to re -set lines and reposition the field as a regulation softball diamond This will include setting the uifield standards to both Men's and Youth lines and distances The survey will also be used to establish a proper grade for the field to allow proper drainage and bring it into similarity with the rest of Pico Park. 2 Re -grading and compacting the field This will also include the importation of soil to help level the playing surface 3 Re-allignment and installation of additional irrigation It is anticipated that project will include extending the grass line for the outfield further into the infield This will require an run of at least one additional row of sprinklers 4 Re -seeding the field (outfield only) The is anticipated to cost between $16,000 and $18,000 Staff is requesting authorization to re -program $10,000 from the Park Maintenance Account (10-450-705) which was previously allocated for the purchase of a park utility COUNCIL AGENDA 14EW!#)76 Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (3X ) MEETING DATE September 11, 1997 SUBJECT PICO PARK SCOREBOARDS GRAND TERRACE LITTLE LEAGUE NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND: Since the opening of Pico Park, Star in conjunction with the Grand Terrace Little League Board have worked together on a number of projects to improve our parks to meet various needs which have arisen since the opening in August, 1994 Many of these projects have been done in partnership with Little League on both a financial and labor basis These have included the following 1 Extending the bull pen fencing along the Little League Fields 2 and 3 2 Raising the fencing of the Softball Field #1 to protect spectators 3 Improvements to the fields at both Pico Park and Terrace Ifills Field in the areas of adding additional brick dust and increased maintenance of the fields 4 Improvements to the snack bar and dug out areas In many of these cases, Little League has been not only an advocate for the changes, but also the primary financial contributor to projects Probably the best example of Little Leagues commitment to enhancing their facilities is the work done at the Terrace Hulls Field Since 1995, Little League has contributed to the improvements on the field m three major ways First, they installed approximately 100 feet of chain link fencing m left field, creating a "home run" fence and helping to enclose the field Second, they, in partnership with the City, re -surveyed the field, re -set base lines, pitching mounds and had volunteers re -grade the field to bring it into conformance with little league standards The City of Grand Terrace paid for approximately 80 tons of brick dust and provided the labor to install and level the playing field Thirdly and most significantly, GTLL paid for the complete replacement of the chain link fencing of the backstop and the pouring of concrete walkways m excess of over 2,000 square feet COUNCILA(3€NDA tTEM#fA Jur 1I-19-97 09 55A San Bdno Dist Atty 909 387-6496 TUN-1.9-1997 Q9�33 i A CjlrrEM SPECTFICAnON'S - BASEBALL SCOREBOARDS P.02 a 02 DIMENSION 3' 8- lush x S' wide a 7- dW W e116 k-V' S S' L 86 s N e I TION VIVLAYED. Hone Swm GoW Score. InrJnS, Ball. Striae, and Out . 15' dgh, 4 x 7 pattem, 13 wut 130 volt Clear 1.9UM so M laps Shall fqb not 0.19, ;hell resuw 0-9 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE :_SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 PART-TIME AND TEMPORARY MMOYEES NO FUNDING REQUIRED Currently, part-time and temporary (i e seasonal recreation workers) are, by law, covered under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), if they are not covered under the City PERS plan PERS requires that employees engaged in at least 1,000 hours per year be covered under PERS The City now has the opportunity to set up an alternative retirement plan for part -tune and temporary employees Last year AB2400 was passed to give public agencies more opportunity to start an alternative retirement plan and spell out the process and procedure of employee notifications, elections and coordination with PERS Employees currently contribute 6 20/6 of gross wages for FICA The City is required to contribute a matching 6 2% for FICA The City may set up an alternative social security plan and reduce or eliminate the required matching 6 21/6, as long as it is an allowable plan, and that the total contribution is 7 S% as per Federal guidelines The management and trustee costs may be divided between the City and the participant The City would join other agencies in a 401(a) plan that is administered by Phase H Systems Contributions to the PARS Alternate Retirement System will be handled and invested by the Union Bank of California, the trustee of the plan. The City may delegate direction of the plan assets on behalf of the employee or direct the Trustee to invest the assets of the plan. The City will be able to achieve a small, but permanent, savings on the FICA matching portion that would no longer be contributed The City will have no unfunded liability smce this is a defined contribution plan. The City will have control over contributions in the PARS-ARS plan. -1- COUNCILAGOdDA t1 �6 I" I, CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PARS-ARS Page 3 Staff is recommending that the City "pick up" 13% as its' share of the contribution along with the employee share of 6 r/® to reach the 7 S% contribution requirement Staff is recommending that the employee pay all maintenance expenses in heu of the City's "pick up" share of 13% Maintenance expenses include service fees, asset management fees, trustee fees and a termination fee Staff recommends the employee policy to be implemented A) Full-time or part time Employees in PERS who are vested, at the time alternative plan is adopted NO ACTION Necessary! They must remain in PER& B) Full-time Employees who are in PERS but who are not vested at the time the alternative plan is adopted Within 90 days after adoption of alternative plan , they must elect to either remain in PERS or elect the Alternative Plan, however, this would not take effect unless the employee went below 1,000 hours per year and was not yet 100% vested in PER& C) Part-time or Temporary Employees who are non -vested members of PERS, (and under 1,000 annual hours) and who were hired before the adoption of the alternative plan. Within 90 days after adoption of alternative plan , they must elect to either remain in PERS or elect the Alternative Plan. D) Part-time or Temporary Employees who are not in PERS (Social Security), who were hired before or after the adoption of the alternative plan. No election is necessary, City will direct retirement coverage of these employees to the alternative plan. -3- Alternative Retirement Plan CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PROFORMA ANALYSIS OF PARS-ARS PLAN SAVINGS AND COSTS Gross YEM Waga enploy" ty F" FICA Deduotloe PAYABLE Lz% L2% EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,41 1997-EST 45,000 2,790 2,790 EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,4\ 19W 65,220 4,044 4,044 EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,4\ 1995 85,940 6,328 5,328 EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,4\ 1994 95,290 5,908 5,908 EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,41 1993 79,761 4,945 4,945 EMPLOYEE GROSS WAGES,4\ 1992 95,129 &M 5.M Over Five years 468,340 28,913 28,913 W PARS- MS WAS AVAILABLE Employse CITY CITY Aftmeliw Altemadn sample Plan Plan savtnps Deducilon comma (d plan M 14% available) 2,790 585 2,205 4,044 848 3,196 5,328 1,117 4,211 5,908 1,239 4,669 4,945 1,037 3,908 1,N37 4M 28,913 6,062 22,851 11 Savings would come from a decrease in employers porter FICA elimination less whatever % City elected to pock up as their contribution 3\The employee's part of the retirement pick up will be "Pretax' deduction 41 Employees not In PERS, subject to FICA the Start Up Costs Set up fee to Phase 11 Systems (one time fee) 750 IRS Letter deterrninabon (one Time fee) 700 Prograrrung change in Payroll software to accept a pretax deduction (one time fe 1 m Start Up Costs 2M Annual Costs (can be nm&M or emplZw costs) monthly service fees to adn*dsft r Phes EST cost for one year 500 PARS Trustee fees (12%) (12% of contributions) 91 Estimated Annual Costs Am Other Costs Asset management fees (based on ann av deduct from employee trust earning 0150% Termination fee deduct from employee trust account $12 00 Analysis-PARS-ARS 5 AB2400 - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 2 of 4 20306 (a) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 20305, an employee participating in this system, other than a local safety member, who is credited with less than five years of state service and whose service falls below the minimum service prescribed by paragraph (2) o& or subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (3) of, subdivision (a) of Section 20305 and who is eligible for membership in an alternate retirement plan established or maintained by the county superintendent of schools or the public agency pursuant to Article 15 (commencing with Section 53215) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, may participate in that plan in accordance with the following provisions (1) Eligibility to participate in an alternate retirement plan for an employee who is employed on or after July 1, 1997, or the effective date of the establishment of an alternate retirement plan, whichever is later, and who is represented by an exclusive bargaining representative shall be determined by the provisions of a memorandum of understanding executed between the public agency and the exclusive bargaining representative of the employee That memorandum of understanding shall prescribe all of the terms and conditions under which the alternate plan is established including the employer and employee contribution rates (2) Eligibility to participate in an alternate retirement plan for an employee who is employed on or after July 1, 1997, or the effective date of the establishment of an alternate retirement plan, whichever is later, and who is not represented by an exclusive bargaining representative shall be determined by the public agency (3) Eligibility to participate in an alternate retirement plan established prior to July 1, 1997, for an employee who is employed prior to that date, or for plans established on or after July 1, 1997, for an employee who is employed prior to the date the plan is established, shall be determined by the employee in accordance with the following election procedures (A) The employer shall make available to each employee prior to October 1, 1997, or at least 90 days prior to the proposed effective date of the alternate retirement plan, whichever is later, information describing the employee's rights and responsibilities as a participant in either this system or the alternate retirement plan offered by the employer and describing the benefits provided by this system and that alternate retirement plan. The information shall include all of the terms and conditions under which the system and the alternate retirement plan are established including the employer and employee contribution rates (B) An employee who fails to make an election prior to January 1, 1998, or 90 days after being given the election opportunity, whichever is later, shall be informed by the employer by certified mail that the failure to make that election has been deemed an election to participate in the alternate retirement plan whenever his or her employment fall below the requirements prescribed by Section 20305 (C) The employer shall maintain in its files a written acknowledgment by the employee that the employee received the information required under this section within the specified tuneframe and shall maintain election results and election forms of employees Wednesday, April 09, 1997 5 10 PM irrc f ' � v t " � `k�' T ",_ RESOLUTION NO.97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING THE PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PARS) TRUST, DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR FOR PARS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE PARS ADOPTION AGREEMENT it is determined to be in the best interest of the City of Grand Terrace ("CITY") and its employees to provide a Qualifying Retirement System to all employees not currently eligible for such a Qualifying Retirement System, thereby meeting the requirements of Section 11332 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act and Section 3121(bx7)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Public Agency Retirement System (PARS), a governmental plan, has made such a System available to the CITY and its eligible employees, and qualifies under California Government Code Sec 20,000, Section 11332 of the 1990 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA 90), and meets the meaning of the term "retirement system" as given by Section 218(b)(4) of the Federal Social Security Act, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS (1) The COUNCIL does hereby adopt the PARS Trust, including the PARS Alternate Retirement System (ARS), effective September 22, 1997, the Effective Date for the benefit of employees on that date and hired thereafter, and (2) The COUNCIL hereby appoints the City Manager, or the designee of the City Manager, as CITY Administrator for PARS, and further authorizes hkAer to implement the Plan. (3) The CEMCs PARS Administrator is hereby vAt onzed to execute the PARS Adoption Agreement on behalf of the CITY and to take whatever additional actions that are necessary to maintain the participation of the CITY in PARS and to maintain PARS compliance with Section 11332 of the ACT and relevant regulations issued or as may be issued PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of September, 1997 ATTEST City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof a MI t� STAFF REPORT City Manager's Department CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE September 11, 1997 SUBJECT TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION PLANNING Ia• )1M In 1998, the City of Grand Terrace will mark twenty years as an incorporated city in the County of San Bernardino This is a major milestone for our community, and it would be appropriate to celebrate the occasion throughout 1998 with a large birthday finale in December 1998 In order to properly plan, a suggestion has been made by Council Member Garcia to create an ad hoc committee to coordinate the potential activities and to make recommendations to the City Council Attached Is a memorandum from Council Member Garcia winch outlines a possible strategy for creating an ad hoc committee Staff concurs that it would be appropriate to have a representative of the City Council on the ad hoc committee, and that the working committee should include the three people that have come forward to volunteer on this committee Council Member Garcia has volunteered to chair the working committee and indicated that she will take the time necessary to coordinate and recommend a course of action to the City Council REVIEW COUNCIL MEMBER LEE ANN GARCIA'S MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE CREATION OF A TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION AD HOC COMNIITTEE. APPOINT A COUNCIL MEMBER AND THE FOLLOWING THREE INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE VOLUNTEERED TO THE TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION AD HOC CONIl44ITTEE: MARY TRAINOR, CHAMBER PRESIDENT; DON LARE IN, CHAMBER MEMBER; BRENDA STANFILL, CITY CLERK. TS yjm Attachment COUNCIL AGENDA fTEM#g, 20th ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE Page Two The Plan is to celebrate our heritage while looking with enthusiasm to our future, as it is important for communities to celebrate those special moments in their history The Grand Terrace family has grown considerably since 1978, and I am sure our new members will welcome knowing more about this special place we call home The Plan is to build pride in our community by creating a special 20th Anniversary feeling in our City The hope is to create a theme that can be incorporated into plans of the existing commissions and programs/projects The whole focus will be to enrich the already great programs we have in the City, and to provide the opportunity for our residents and businesses to know more about where we have been and where we are going Our current Calendar of Community Events includes the following Date Event 1 1 /01 /97 Country Fair 12/1 1 /97 19th City Birthday Party 04/1 1 /98 Spring Egg Hunt 05/03/98 Art Show 06/13/98 Grand Terrace Day's Parade 10/04/98 Tour de Terrace 10/00/98 Volunteer Appreciation Picnic 10/31 /98 Halloween Haunt 1 1 /07/98 Country Fair 12/17/98 20th City Birthday Party Coordinator Historical and Cultural Activities Committee Historical and Cultural Activities Committee Recreation Department Historical and Cultural Activities Committee Community Services Officer Recreation Department City Clerk's Department Recreation Department Historical and Cultural Activities Committee Historical and Cultural Activities Committee The work of the ad hoc committee would include, but not be limited to • Creating a special logo/theme for our 20th Anniversary • Coordinating with currently planned events • Developing a program that would touch our community in a special way, such as a new "Dire tional/Street Sign Program" to give our entire City an opportunity to be part of the celebration