Loading...
06/10/2014SB COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER - 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313, wait Stanckimitz, Mayor , -Darcy MdN@b®@, Council M@rnb@r Jacki@ Mltch@II, Council M@rnb@r Sylvia R®bl@s, Council M@rnb@r K@@n@tb J, b@lid@r§on, lnt@riffl City Manapr Richard L, Adam, City Att@rig@y Cynthia A. F@rtun@, Fi@anc@ ®ir@@t@r Sandra Molina, lnt@rir@ C®munity ®@v@I@pry@@t ®ir@ct@r ®@b@ra fife@rn§@n, Intorn City Cl@rk f Tha AranA TarW@ City gANngil maat§ gn thn Amend and Fgmrth Tmmday of @ash menth at NP pm, Q�' CITY OF GRAND TERRACE A D TER a CITY COUNCIL • AGENDA • JUNE 107 2014 Council Chambers Regular Meeting o 6 00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center • 22795 Barton Road The City of Grand Terrace complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk's office at (909) 824-6621 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting If you desire to address the City Council during the meeting, please complete a request to speak form available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk Speakers will be called upon by the Mayor at the appropriate time Any documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at city hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours In addition, such documents will be posted on the City's website at www cityofgrandterrace org CALL TO ORDER AMENDED AGENDA ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED FOR ITEMS 7A(D), 8A, 813 Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Attendee Name Present Absent #Late ' Arrived _ Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz ❑ ❑ ❑ Council Member Darcy McNaboe ❑ ❑ ❑ Council Member Jackie Mitchell ❑ Council Member Sylvia Robles ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ITEMS TO DELETE 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3 CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion A Waive Full Reading of Full Ordinances on Agenda City of Grand Terrace Page 1 Agenda Grand Terrace City Council June 10, 2014 B Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting — 05/13/2014 C Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting — 05/27/2014 D Status of Business License Audit E Acceptance by the City Council of Pico Park Baseball Field and Pathway Parcels from the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace 4 PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting 5 COUNCIL REPORTS A Council Member Jackie Mitchell B Council Member Sylvia Robles C Council Member Darcy McNaboe D Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS A An Ordinance Establishing New Speed Limits on Certain Streets Based on Speed Zone Survey 7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS AMENDED ITEM 7A(D) A Additional Information Related to Child Care Proposed Rates for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Per Council Request B Five -Year General Fund Projection 8 NEW BUSINESS AMENDED ITEMS 8A & 8B ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED A Appointment of Planning Commission Members to the Planning Commission B California League of Cities 2014 Delegation 9 CLOSED SESSION ADJOURN The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 6 00 PM Agenda item requests must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk's office no later than 14 calendar days preceding the meeting City of Grand Terrace Page 2 3B CITY OF GRAND TERRACE GRR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES a MAY 13, 2014 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6 00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center • 22795 Barton Road CALL TO ORDER Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency Invocation The Invocation was led by Pastor McRae from Azure Hills Seventh -day Adventist Church Pledge of Allegiance Council Member McNaboe led the Pledge of Allegiance Name Title _ Status Arrived _Attendee Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor �esent Darcy McNaboe Council Member Present Jackie Mitchell Council Member Present Sylvia Robles Council Member Present Kenneth J Henderson Interim City Manager Present Robert Khuu Deputy City Attorney Present Debora Thomsen Interim City Clerk Present Steve Elam Project Manager, Finance Department Present Sandra Molina Interim Community Development Director Present Emily Wong Interim Assistant City Manager Present Cynthia Fortune Finance Director Present Donny Mahoney San Bernardino Co Sheriff Department Present 1 ITEMS TO DELETE City Manager Henderson noted Item 8 C would be pulled from the Agenda and brought back at a future date once issues with Caltrans have been resolved 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A Certificate of Recognition was provided to the Planning Commission Chairman, Mr Thomas Comstock A Certificate of Appreciation was presented after Council recognition of former City Employee and Community leader Elizabeth Duarte Mrs Duarte's family received a plaque in her honor A Presentation of Operating Budget Meritorious Award from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers for the City's Fiscal Year 2013 - 2014 Budget Project Manager Steve Elam and Finance Director Cynthia Fortune presented to Council the award received from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers in honor of the Operating Budget Meritorious Award for Fiscal Year 2013-14 It was noted this is the first time the City has received this award B Presentation of Certificate of Achievement to the City of Grand Terrace City of Grand Terrace Page 9 Packet Pg 3 Minutes C 3 A B C 4 5 A L C Grand Terrace City Council 3B May 13, 2014 A Certificate of Achievement was presented by Jon Gaede, a representative from Assembly Member Cheryl's Brown's office, to acknowledge the comprehensive resolution regarding long standing wastewater issues between Grand Terrace and the City of Colton Recognition of former City Employee and Community Leader Former City employee Elizabeth Duarte was acknowledged for her many years of service to the City and community of Grand Terrace Council Member McNaboe presented a plaque to her surviving children, sons Stephen and Daniel Duarte and daughter Elizabeth Wilcox The meeting was adjourned in her honor to recognize her many contributions to the Community CONSENT CALENDAR RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member SECONDER Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Waive Full Reading of Full Ordinances on Agenda Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting — 04/22/2014 Approval of Check Register No 05-13-2014 PUBLIC COMMENT Mr Bob Levin, Chairman of the Veterans Wall of Freedom, invited the community to participate in the festivities for Memorial Day, to be held on May 26, 11 00 A M at Pico Park COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Jackie Mitchell Council Member Mitchell spoke about attending Highgrove Days, stating she was looking forward to Grand Terrace's annual Community Days She expressed her concerns regarding traffic safety and congestion at the intersection of Michigan and Barton Road, noting the need to have the traffic lights synchronized Council Member Mitchell also noted she has been receiving complaints regarding the appearance of the middle school, stating overall maintenance was needed and requested and received confirmation the school district was responsible Council Member Sylvia Robles Council Member Robles stated she has been receiving complaints regarding vehicles speeding on Palm Avenue, then turning abruptly, noting the issue is safety She also requested to be notified and have pertinent information placed on the city's blog regarding local crime She stated many times she receives calls regarding incidents but does not know any information She noted she had missed the April 22 City Council meeting, which was the first time she has been out ill She further stated she had recently lost a close family member, her sister-in-law, a special woman with great talents and knowledge who will be dearly missed Council Member Darcy McNaboe Council Member McNaboe offered her condolences to Council Member Robles for her loss City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Packet Pg 4 L V C d R c� C 0 fA C 0 V v 36 Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 13, 2014 C 6 7 A 8 B A Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor Stanckiewitz stated how grateful he was to the Council, staff, and all those involved who have worked hard to bring about positive changes for the City He noted, tonight, many results of this effort would be before the Council for approval, such as the Vision and Strategic Plan which will provide a direction for future action by identifying five goals He also discussed the City's improving financial management, demonstrated with the award received, the Fiscal Policies and the budget before the Council tonight and the outsourcing of Information Systems Mayor Stanckiewitz informed all there was now a Wells Fargo ATM machine outside Taco Village PUBLIC HEARINGS None UNFINISHED BUSINESS Approval of Fiscal Policies Project Manager Steve Elam gave an overview of the purpose and necessity for the policies presented Interaction was held with the Council to resolve all questions, such as the future use of Debit / Credit cards and on-line interactive forms and payments In addition, definition was provided regarding the authority these policies would provide overall for the City Manager, fund transfers, and monthly check ratification versus bi-weekly check register approval Motion was made to approve all Fiscal Policies for this item, which passed unanimously RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member SECONDER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Resetting of the Proposition 218 Public Hearing for Proposed City of Grand Terrace New Sewer Rates Emily Wong gave an update regarding the need to reset the Proposition 218 Public Hearing for the proposed new sewer rates Motion passed unanimously to 1) Rescind the Proposition 218 Public Hearing scheduled for June 10, 2014 at 6 00 p m 2) Reset the Proposition 218 Public Hearing scheduled for proposed new sewer rates on July 8, 2014 at 6 00 p m , and 3) Authorize Staff to give proper notice RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member SECONDER Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles I.I =0111 1,W1 I `I **:� City of Grand Terrace 2030 Vision and 2014-2020 Strategic Plan Interim City Manager Henderson presented the proposed City of Grand Terrace 2030 Vision and 2014 - 2020 Strategic Plan, noting the need to develop a vision and direction for the community With a common City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Packet Pg 5 36 Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 13, 2014 goal and established guidelines, both residents and the City would benefit economically for the future It was noted this plan provides a vision of where the City should be in 2030 Ms Kendall Flint (Flint Strategies), the Vision / Plan facilitator, outlined the Plan in detail and responded to questions Some of the subjects discussed were the mission, vision, core values, infrastructure, economic and community development, and successful partnerships within the community and government agencies Council voiced approval, stating changes were needed and there would now be a road map in place, which offered broad opportunity and included checks and balances Motion was made and passed unanimously to approve the City of Grand Terrace 2030 Vision and 2014 - 2020 Strategic Plan RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member SECONDER Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles B Approval of Information Systems Support Agreement with City of Loma Linda C IC Project Manager Elam presented the Information Systems Support Agreement with the City of Loma Linda to Council on behalf of the City Manager's office He noted the extensive analysis both Grand Terrace and Loma Linda took to identify the needs of Grand Terrace The Council was informed the City has not adequately upgraded hardware / software or the appropriate infrastructure needed today Council discussed the strong reputation of Loma Linda's information technology program, questioned the cost, the promptness and level of service the City would receive, and acknowledged the benefit of working cohesively with neighboring cities Motion was made and passed unanimously to approve the Information Systems Support Agreement with the City of Loma Linda and authorize the Interim City Manager to sign the Agreement after making any minor administrative revisions that may be needed in order to finalize the document RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Walt Stanckiewitz, Mayor SECONDER Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Freeway Agreement Between the State of California, Acting through the Department of Transportation, and the City of Grand Terrace Regarding the I-215/Barton Road Interchange Project City Manager Henderson requested this item be tabled at the beginning of the meeting Council determined they would like to see all of the items together, therefore a Motion was made to unanimously table this item RESULT TABLED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Sylvia Robles, Council Member SECONDER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Budget Workshop (Introduction of FY 2014-2015 Budget) City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Packet Pg 6 v r_ 36 Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 13, 2014 E F G Finance Director Cynthia Fortune provided an overview of the proposed Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015 budget, noting action is not required at this time The future budget adoption schedule was provided, on May 27, Staff will introduce to Council the budget for the purpose of review and discussion Council received staffs presentation Selection of Alternate to Water Policy Committee After Council discussion, Council Member Robles was unanimously selected as Alternate to the Water Policy Committee RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member SECONDER Walt Stanckiewitz, Mayor AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Selection of City of Grand Terrace Southern California Association of Governments Representative After Council discussion, Council Member Robles was unanimously selected as the representative for Grand Terrace to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member SECONDER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Selection of Mayor Pro-Tem Discussion was held between the Council regarding various recommendations and perspectives, including the duties of the Mayor Pro-Tem position Several subjects were discussed, such as consideration of motives, politics, seniority, and leaving the seat vacant Amended Council Member Robles moved to fill the position of Mayor Pro-Tem by seniority, Council Member Mitchell made a Motion to leave the position of Mayor Pro-Tem empty Mayor Stanckiewitz stated the item died for lack of a Motion, therefore, the Mayor Pro-Tem position will remain vacant RESULT FAILED [0 TO 4] NAYS Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles 9 CLOSED SESSION 9A CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS, pursuant to Section 54956 8 of the Government Code Property Grand Terrace Senior Citizens/Community Services Center located at 22140 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, Ca 92324 Agency negotiator Kenneth J Henderson, Interim City Manager Negotiating parties Grand Terrace Lions Club City of Grand Terrace Page 5 Packet Pg 7 3B Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 13, 2014 Under negotiation Terms of Lease Payment NOTE Council Member McNaboe recused herself from Closed Session due to a conflict regarding her husband's involvement with the Grand Terrace Lion's Club ACTION Mayor Stanckiewitz and the Council Members returned to the dais after Closed Session to report out The Mayor noted the Council received reports from the Agency negotiator and Agency Attorney, however, no action was taken ADJOURN Adjournment of this meeting is in honor of Elizabeth Duarte, a valuable, former employee of the City of �+ Grand Terrace = d The meeting was adjourned at 8 34 p m The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 27, 2014 at 6 00 p m = m N 10 STAFF REPORTS c None ... Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace City of Grand Terrace Page 6 Packet Pg 8 1 2 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES • MAY 27, 2014 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6 00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center • 22795 Barton Road CALL TO ORDER Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency Invocation The Invocation was led by Pastor Andy McRae from Azure Hills Seventh -day Adventist Church Pledge of Allegiance Mr Bob Lavin, Chairman of The Foundation of Grand Terrace Veterans Wall of Freedom led the Pledge of Allegiance Attendee Name i� _ Title_ Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor f _Status Present i Arrived ^ �� Darcy McNaboe Council Member Present Jackie Mitchell Council Member Present Sylvia Robles Council Member r Present Kenneth J Henderson Interim City Manager Present Richard Adams City Attorney _ Present Debora Thomsen Interim City Clerk Present Steve Elam Proj'ect Manager, Finance Department Present Cathy Varela Director of Child Care Services Present Sandra Molina Interim Community Development Director Present Emily Wong Interim Assistant City Manager Present ' Cynthia Fortune Finance Director _ _ Present Donny Mahoney San Bernardino Co Sheriff Department Present ITEMS TO DELETE None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Riverside Highland Water Company Water Awareness Poster Contest Winners form the following schools A Grand Terrace Elementary B Terrace View Elementary Mr Don Hough, General Manager of Riverside Highland Water Company, called up the children who had won an award from Grand Terrace Elementary School, and Terrace View Elementary principal, Dr Adeyemo introduced the students from his school All students were introduced by their name and grade, and they displayed the winning poster they had made Pictures were taken at the dais with the Council and the winning students Mr John Futch, Field Representative for San Bernardino County Supervisor, Mr James Ramos, invited residents to join the Supervisor for coffee at The REC Center located at 12034 La Crosse Avenue in City of Grand Terrace Page 1 Packet Pg 9 3C Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 27, 2014 3 4 Grand Terrace The event will occur on May 30, from 8 to 9 a m He noted this would not be a question and answer session, but an opportunity for individuals to speak with Supervisor Ramos on a one-to-one basis CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Robles pulled Item 3 B for discussion Council then requested the minutes be brought back (continued) at the next meeting scheduled June 10, 2014 for clarification regarding the selection of a Mayor Pro-Tem Council Member McNaboe abstained from voting on Items 3 E, 3 F, and 3 G, since she is the current President of the Foundation of Grand Terrace RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member SECONDER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles A Waive Full Reading of Full Ordinances on Agenda B Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting — 05/13/2014 C Check Register No 05-27-2014 D Support of Veterans Wall of Freedom E Wall of Freedom Memorial Day Event Fee Waiver Request Council Member McNaboe abstained from voting on Item 3 E, since she is the current President of the Foundation of Grand Terrace F Wall of Freedom Memorial Fee Waiver Request Council Member McNaboe abstained from voting on Item 3 F, since she is the current President of the Foundation of Grand Terrace G Community Day Fee Waiver Request Council Member McNaboe abstained from voting on Item 3 G, since she is the current President of the Foundation of Grand Terrace PUBLIC COMMENT Mr William Hays questioned the percentage of funds Grand Terrace and the City of Colton would each receive regarding the Waste Water fee increase He expressed concern why he must submit a written protest rather than a verbal statement to indicate opposition to the proposed sewer rate increase Mr Hays requested confirmation if the majority of property owners did not submit written protests, then all protests would be considered null He then questioned what authority allowed this Interim City Manager Henderson responded, stating the City of Colton would receive 100% of the proposed sewer rate increase City Attorney Adams clarified this procedure was in compliance with the California State Constitution due to an initiative, not the Brown Act Mayor Stanckiewitz noted the process was in compliance with Proposition 218 passed by the voters City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Packet Pg 10 M 3C Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 27, 2014 Mr Don Larkin thanked the City for their support and involvement regarding the Veterans Wall of Freedom He noted reservations were being taken for the wall plaques, with the goal of completion by Veterans Day, 2015 5 COUNCIL REPORTS A Council Member Jackie Mitchell None B Council Member Sylvia Robles Council Member Robles noted her support for local cities which were relatively new and small since they have been able to hold their own In addition, she commented regarding the positive involvement of the community for Colton's Relay for Life event and the Memorial Day Ceremony held at Pico Park in Grand Terrace 0 c She stated over $111,000 was raised, noting one family alone contributed $8,300 She encouraged c everyone from personal experience to take precautionary measures to check for cancer U Council Member Robles noted how touching the Memorial Service was at Pico Park and thanked all n Veterans for their service and the Council for their unity of support °- C Council Member Darcy McNaboe None D Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor Stanchkiewitz encouraged those to come out and be a part of the blood drive sponsored by Wdden Pump & Engineering, Wednesday June 11, 2014 from 12 to 5 p m Appointments can be made by contacting Natalie at 909-422-1700 He noted the Memorial Day event at Pico Park was heartfelt and thanked the many people who attended 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS c None a. m 7 UNFINISHED BUSINESS a None r c 8 NEW BUSINESS A Economic Development Workshop Interim Assistant City Manager Emily Wong provided a thorough presentation of an Economic Development Strategic Plan, noting this was in conformance with the newly adopted Vision, specifically Goal # 3 The highlights focused on how to promote and sustain economic prosperity and a balanced local economy She discussed in detail the advantages of a Marketing Plan and the Entitlement Process, along with an analysis which detailed current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) Ms Wong responded to Council's questions as they arose This was an informative presentation, the item was received and filed City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Packet Pg 11 3C Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 27, 2014 Mayor Stanckiewitz called a 10 minute recess starting at 7 45 The meeting was called to order at 7 55 p m Introduction of Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2014-15 Finance Director Cynthia Fortune introduced the proposed budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-15 for Council's review and deliberation prior to adoption The budget addressed all City funds and identified budget requests Two specific funds were discussed in detail, the General Fund and the Child Care Services Fund, which identified proposed revenues and expenditures, along with a summary of the proposed budget requests It was noted the existing schedule of budget approval is as follows June 10 to continue budget deliberations, and June 24, 2014 to adopt the FY 2014-15 budget and approve Appropriations (Gann) Limit Although the budget itself was not adopted and deliberations will continue as scheduled, a motion was made to unanimously approve the proposed budget requests RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Darcy McNaboe, Council Member SECONDER Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles 0 C IC Twenty -First -Amendment to Law Enforcement Contract with County of San Bernardino Interim City Manager Henderson gave an overview of Contract 94-797 A-21 noting the initial year of adoption was 1994, and this was the Twenty -First Amendment He noted there was an increase of 4 5%, however, the law enforcement staffing level would remain the same as Fiscal Year 2013-14 Council approved the Twenty -First Amendment to the Agreement with San Bernardino County Sheriff Department unanimously RESULT APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Sylvia Robles, Council Member SECONDER Jackie Mitchell, Council Member AYES Walt Stanckiewitz, Darcy McNaboe, Jackie Mitchell, Sylvia Robles Child Care Rate Increase Fiscal Year 2014-15 Child Care Director Cathy Varela, and Finance Director Cynthia Fortune, gave an overview of the past year's expenditures and revenue Discussion regarding establishing a contingency fund to offset unanticipated expenses, such as equipment repairs and the California mandatory minimum wage increase (effective July 1, 2014) Research provided comparison costs of other child care centers and confirmed Grand Terrace has lower child care rates 2 Increasing the rate at various percentages was considered Council requested this item be brought back at the next meeting with the dollar amount associated with multiple percentage rate increases with an appropriate contingency to further evaluate and clarify the best resolution for all involved RESULT FORWARDED Next 6/10/2014 6 00 PM 9 CLOSED SESSION None City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Packet Pg 12 Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 27, 2014 ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 8 34 p m The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 10, 2014 at 6 00 p m Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace C1 V c W C. 0 0 0 a N 7 c L� City of Grand Terrace Page 5 Packet Pg 13 s3 D TITLE PRESENTED BY RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council Item Status of Business License Audit Steve Elam, Project Manager, Finance Department Receive and file staff report There is a need to perform an audit of the City's Business Licensing process to ensure compliance with the City's Business License ordinance and collection of business taxes that are due the City The City Council has recently expressed concern over various aspects of the Business License process and inquired when a business license program audit will occur DISCUSSION The Finance Department is responsible for administration of the City's Business License ordinance and will be preparing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Business License audit The RFP is expected to be released in September of this year Other items that are currently in process by Finance and taking priority over the Business License audit services RFP are as follows • Completion of FY 2014-15 budget process (June) • Issuance of RFP for financial audit services (July) • Evaluation of credit card processing at City Hall and Child Care Center (August) • Establishment of a Monthly Financial Report (August) The RFP for Business License audit services will address all components\ of the Business License process such as • Compliance with the ordinance • Identification of unlicensed businesses • Business tax collection efficiency • Improvements in ongoing administration of the Business License program The City Council will be advised when the RFP for Business License audit services is released and of the schedule leading to award of a Professional Services Agreement for such services FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this staff report or with issuance of an RFP for Business License audit services The City Council will be advised regarding any fiscal impact associated with the actual audit work, in conjunction with approval of a Packet Pg 14 Professional Services Agreement for the audit services, as well as the expected revenue impact related to the audit APPROVALS Steve Elam Completed Finance Completed City Attorney Completed City Manager Completed City Council Pending 05/27/2014 4 19 PM 05/29/2014 11 31 AM 05/29/2014 11 55 AM 05/29/2014 7 57 PM Packet Pg 15 TITLE PRESENTED BY AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council Item Acceptance by the City Council of Pico Park Baseball Field and Pathway Parcels from the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace Sandra Molina, Interim Community Development Director RECOMMENDATION 1) Adopt a Resolution accepting property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1167-151-75 from the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace, 2) Adopt a Resolution accepting property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 1167-151-73 from the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace, and, 3) Authorize staff to record the attached arant deeds BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On June 25, 2013, the Successor Agency adopted two separate, and respective, Resolutions transferring the Pico Park baseball field and Pico Park pathway parcels to the City of Grand Terrace On July 17, 2013, the Oversight Board also adopted Resolutions approving the transfer of the two properties to the City of Grand Terrace These actions were taken pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 34181(a) and 34191 3, which provide that properties held by a successor agency and were constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, may be transferred from a successor agency to the appropriate jurisdiction (i a the City) On February 7, 2014, staff was notified by the Department of Finance that the transfer of these Agency assets (two parcels) is allowable pursuant to HSC Section 34181 (a), with such notification confirming the appropriateness of the actions taken by the Successor Agency and Oversight Board In order to effectuate the transfer of the properties from the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace, the City Council must formally accept the properties Therefore, adoption of the attached Resolutions is recommended FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact other than staff time related to the transfer of the subject Packet Pg 16 parcel The transfer of the property is exempt from documentary transfer tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code § 11922 ATTACHMENTS • 1 City Council Resolution_ Baseball Field • 2 City Council Resolution —Baseball Field Pathway APPROVALS Sandra Molina Completed Finance Completed City Attorney Completed Community Development Completed City Manager Completed City Council Pending 05/29/2014 4 09 PM 05/29/2014 4 11 PM 06/02/2014 10 56 AM 06/02/2014 11 04 AM 06/02/2014 12 29 PM Packet Pg 17 3Ea RESOLUTION 2014 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING PROPERTY FROM THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CONTAINING THE PICO PARK BASEBALL FIELD EXPANSION AND CONSISTING OF 2 51 ACRES WHEREAS, on November 9, 2010, the former community redevelopment agency of the City of Grand Terrace and the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace adopted Resolution No 2010-08 and Resolution No 2010-37, respectively, stating that the agency desired to construct and install public improvements consisting of a baseball field in the former redevelopment project area, that the lack of public facilities and park improvements created blighting conditions and the baseball field facility improvements would benefit the project area and approved the construction of the baseball field facility, WHEREAS, on November 9, 2010, a Right of Entry Agreement for Baseball Field Access was entered into between the former community redevelopment agency, City of Grand Terrace and Colton Joint Unified School District to allow the general public to cross school district property to access the new baseball field, WHEREAS, the State Legislature dissolved redevelopment agencies by enacting Assembly Bill Nos 1x 26 and 1484, relating to redevelopment dissolution, ("Dissolution Statutes") which became effective on June 28, 2011 and June 27, 2012, respectively, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34177(e) of the Health & Safety Code the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace is required to dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, provided, however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34181(a) the Oversight Board shall direct the Successor Agency to dispose of all assets and properties of the former redevelopment c agency, provided, however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed and used for a 6 governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements relating to the construction or use of such an asset, a Packet Pg 18 3Ea WHEREAS, Health & Safety Code section 34191 3 authorizes the Successor Agency to transfer such properties currently, and anticipated to be, used for a valid governmental purpose, WHEREAS, the property with Assessor's Parcel No 1167-151-75 ("Property") is an asset of the Successor Agency (Attached is Exhibit I" further describing the Property), WHEREAS, on October 6, 2011 a Notice of Completion was approved by the City Council and the baseball field has been used for park purposes and will continue to be used for park purposes for the City of Grand Terrace, WHEREAS, the Property is currently being used for the valid governmental purpose of a park, WHEREAS, the City is the appropriate public jurisdiction that should receive the Property, because it is the public jurisdiction that is using the Property for the described valid governmental purpose, WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, the Successor Agency adopted a Resolution approving the transfer of 2 51 acres of land containing the Pico Park Baseball Field from the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace, and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, the Oversight Board to the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency conducted a public hearing and concluded said hearing voting to adopt a Resolution approving the transfer of 2 51 acres of land containing the Pico Park Baseball Field from the Successor Agency to the former City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, the California Department of Finance determined that the transfer of the subject parcel is allowable pursuant to HSC section 34181 (a), which allows agencies to transfer ownership of assets constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction WHEREAS, the City desires to receive the Property from the Successor Agency so that it may continue to use the Property for its valid governmental purpose Packet Pg 19 3Ea NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1 The City Council finds that all of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference Section 2 The City Council finds that the Property is an asset of the Successor Agency that was constructed and used for the current valid governmental purpose of a park Section 3 On February 7, 2014, the California Department of Finance determined that the transfer of the subject parcel is allowable pursuant to HSC section 34181 (a), which allows agencies to transfer ownership of assets constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction Section 4 The City Council hereby accepts the subject Property further described in Exhibit "1" from the Successor Agency, and authorizes the City Manager to take all actions necessary to record the Grant Deed, included in Exhibit "1" PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2014 AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN ATTEST Debora Thomsen Interim City Clerk Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor Packet Pg 20 Attachment,1 City Council Resolution —Baseball Field [Revision 1] (1445 Acceptance of Pico Park Baseball Field and Pathway to City of 3Ea RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313 ATTN CITY CLERK )ace above this line for Recorder's use) Exempt from Recording Fee I Exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax Government Code Section 6103 Revenue & Taxation Code § 11922 APN 1167-151-75-000 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE SUCCESOR AGENCY TO THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, as the successor -in -interest to the rights, obligations, and assets of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency and as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 341710), (GRANTOR) hereby GRANTS to THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation, the real property in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part thereof DATED *ATTEST By Debora Thomsen Interim Agency Secretary Successor Agency to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Walt Stanckiewitz Chairman Successor Agency Packet Pg 22 ` Exhibit 1 Legal Description That portion of lot 39 of East Riverside Land Company per Map recorded in Book 6, Page 44 of maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of California described as Beginning at the southeast corner of said lot 39, Thence north 89053'26" west along the south line of said lot 39, 329 78 feet, Thence north 00°04'28" east, 331 23 feet, Thence south 89053'27" east, 329 85 feet to the east line of said lot 39, Thence south 00005'10" west, 331 23 feet to the Point of Beginning Containing 2 51 acres, more or less W le T r Packet Pg 23 ,3Ea State of California County of On (Date) personally appeared. All Capacity Acknowledgment before me, WN (Name and title of the officer) (Name of person signing) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature of officer Q Packet,Pg 24 3Ea CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE Reference 1167-151-75-000 This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Grant Deed, from the The c V a Successor Agency to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency, as successor -in- o d interest to the rights, obligations, and assets of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment n. Agency and as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 341710), to the City of Gl Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted by the order of the Grand Terrace In City Council on the 10th day of June 2014, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer o Dated Debora Thomsen, Interim City Clerk City of Grand Terrace Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg 25 {3Eb c a ,L^ V RESOLUTION 2014 - 0 2-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING PROPERTY w FROM THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY o REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CONTAINING THE PICO PARK BASEBALL FIELD EXPANSION n. PATHWAY AND CONSISTING OF 0 47 ACRES C WHEREAS, on November 9, 2010, the former community redevelopment agency 2 LL of the City of Grand Terrace and the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace adopted Resolution No 2010-08 and Resolution No 2010-37, respectively, stating that the '0 d agency desired to construct and install public improvements consisting of a baseball field m in the former redevelopment project area, that the lack of public facilities and park improvements created blighting conditions and the baseball field facility improvements would benefit the project area and approved the construction of the baseball field facility, a' 0 WHEREAS, on November 9, 2010, a Right of Entry Agreement for Baseball Field d Access was entered into between the former community redevelopment agency, City of C Grand Terrace and Colton Joint Unified School District to allow the general public to a cross school district property to access the new baseball field, WHEREAS, the State Legislature dissolved redevelopment agencies by enacting Assembly Bill Nos 1x 26 and 1484, relating to redevelopment dissolution, ("Dissolution 3 Statutes") which became effective on June 28, 2011 and June 27, 2012, respectively, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34177(e) of the Health & Safety Code the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace is required to dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, provided, however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34181(a) the Oversight Board shall direct the Successor Agency to dispose of all assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency, provided, however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements relating to the construction or use of such an asset, Page 1 of 8 Packet`Pg 26 3Eb WHEREAS, Health & Safety Code section 34191 3 authorizes the Successor Agency to transfer such properties currently, and anticipated to be, used for a valid governmental purpose, WHEREAS, the property with Assessor's Parcel No 1167-151-73 ("Property") is an asset of the Successor Agency (Attached is Exhibit I" further describing the Property), WHEREAS, on October 6, 2011 a Notice of Completion was approved by the City Council and the baseball field has been used for park purposes and will continue to be used for park purposes for the City of Grand Terrace, WHEREAS, the Property is currently being used for the valid governmental purpose of a park, WHEREAS, the City is the appropriate public jurisdiction that should receive the Property, because it is the public jurisdiction that is using the Property for the described valid governmental purpose, WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, the Successor Agency adopted a Resolution approving the transfer of 2 51 acres of land containing the Pico Park Baseball Field from the Successor Agency to the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace, and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, the Oversight Board to the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency conducted a public hearing and concluded said hearing voting to adopt a Resolution approving the transfer of 2 51 acres of land containing the Pico Park Baseball Field from the Successor Agency to the former City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency to the City of Grand Terrace WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, the California Department of Finance determined that the transfer of the subject parcel is allowable pursuant to HSC section 34181 (a), which allows agencies to transfer ownership of assets constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction WHEREAS, the City desires to receive the Property from the Successor Agency so that it may continue to use the Property for its valid governmental purpose Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg 77 3Eb NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS Section 1 The City Council finds that all of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference Section 2 The City Council finds that the Property is an asset of the Successor Agency that was constructed and used for the current valid governmental purpose of a park Section 3 On February 7, 2014, the California Department of Finance determined that the transfer of the subject parcel is allowable pursuant to HSC section 34181 (a), which allows agencies to transfer ownership of assets constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction Section 4 The City Council hereby accepts the subject Property further described in Exhibit "1" from the Successor Agency, and authorizes the City Manager to take all actions necessary to record the Grant Deed, included in Exhibit "1" PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2014 AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN ATTEST Debora Thomsen Interim City Clerk Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg 28 D v n vCD Q X O O �T -06 Cr '_' O -h (D -� 00 x N (D Attachment 2 City Council Resolution —Baseball Field Pathway (1445 Acceptance of Pico Park Baseball Field and Pathway to City of Grand 3Eb RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313 ATTN CITY CLERK Space above this line for Recorder's use) Exempt from Recording Fee I Exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax Government Code Section 6103 Revenue & Taxation Code § 11922 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, -- THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY -TO THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, as the successor-m-interest to the rights, obligations, and assets of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency and as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 34171 0) (GRANTOR), hereby GRANTS to THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation, the real property in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part thereof DATED *ATTEST Debora Thomsen Interim Agency Secretary Successor Agency for the Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency Page 5 of 8 By Walt Stanckiewitz, Chairman Successor Agency Packet Pg 30 3Eb Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION EAST RIVERSIDE LAND CO SUB E Y2 LOT 42 SEC 5 TP 2S R 4W EX PTN LYING SLY FOL DESC LI COM PT E LI SD LOT 42 AND N R/W LI PICO ST TH N 00 DEG 2 Page 6 of 8 VI Packet Pg 31 3Eb State of California County of On (Date) personally appeared. All Capacity Acknowledgment before me, (Name and title of the officer) (Name of person signing) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature of officer Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg 32 3Eb CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE Reference 1167-151-73-0000 This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Grant Deed, from the ° d Successor Agency to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency, as the successor- c a d in -interest to the rights, obligations, and assets of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Q Agency and as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 341710), to the City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted by the order of the Grand Terrace City Council on the 10th day of June 2014, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its 3 a duly authorized officer d Dated Page 8 of 8 Debora Thomsen, Interim City Clerk City of Grand Terrace 71 Packet Pg 33 11111114:4 IW:INW:l►11r:17-3'1 RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council Item An Ordinance Establishing New Speed Limits on Certain Streets Based on Speed Zone Survey Sandra Molina, Interim Community Development Director 1 City Council conduct a public hearing, and, 2 Read by Title only, waive further reading and introduce an ordinance amending Title 10 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code by repealing and replacing Chapter 10 08 (Speed Limits) in its entirety California statutes require each local agency to perform speed zone studies at least every five years in order to enforce speed limits through the use of radar or other electronic means The Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Title 10, Chapter 10 08 establishes speed limits This Item was initially scheduled for the May 13, 2014 City Council Meeting and tabled to obtain revised cost estimates DISCUSSION The City traffic engineering consultant, Wdldan, recently conducted an Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Grand Terrace, which included speed zone data and field reviews at fourteen locations within the City Based on the analysis, it is recommended that the City Council certify the posted speed zones for these fourteen locations A summary of these fourteen locations is shown on Pages 8 and 9 of the attached Engineering and Traffic Survey Three of the 14 street segments, as identified below, are recommended for a change to the posted speed limit Portions of DeBerry Street and Van Buren Avenue are recommended to have the speed limit raised from 25 mph to 30 mph, and, it is recommended that the speed limit on a segment of Mount Vernon Avenue be lowered from 45 mph to 40 mph Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes Street Speed Zone Section Current Speed Recommended Speed DeBerry St Mt Vernon Ave to East 25 30 Packet Pg 34 terminus Mt Vernon Ave Van Buren Ave to Main St 45 40 Van Buren Ave Mt Vernon Ave to Observation Dr 25 30 Speed zone signing and street markings will need to be changed to reflect the speed zone changes These modifications will be funded as part of the City street maintenance budget Staff has published the notice of Public Hearing in the Grand Terrace City News and posted it in three locations in preparation for this hearing FISCAL IMPACT Fund 20, Measure I funds, account number 20-200-723, City-wide striping Program will be impacted by approximately $4,500 00 to change the street markings and Fund 16, Gas Tax Funds, account number 16-900-220, Special Departmental expense will be impacted approximately $500 00 to purchase new speed limit signs The cost for street markings and signage have been accounted for in the existing budget ATTACHMENTS • Grand Terrace E&T_Draft_4-1-14 • Ordinance APPROVALS Sandra Molina Completed 05/29/2014 7 48 AM Finance Completed 05/29/2014 10 50 AM City Attorney Completed 05/29/2014 11 50 AM Community Development Completed 05/29/2014 1 37 PM City Manager Completed 05/29/2014 7 45 PM City Council Pending Packet Pg 35 VM HOIIVW 33YU1131 UN"9 :10 ,UM 3H1210:1 A3ANns 3hid 11 ONV ON11133NION3 JO d w n� Attachment Grand Terrace E&T Draft 4-1-14 (1466 Speed Zone Survey) d (AemnS ouoZ paadS 99ti�) eoene.L pueaE) ;uawyoe;;d R Q loivill" WI Engineering LDAN TWIN March 24, 2014 Mr Matthew Wirz Management Analyst City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Subject 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr Wirz ti Cq Iextending ti your +r reach R IL As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 14 street segments in the City of Grand Terrace These segments were last surveyed in 2008, and require an update to comply with the 5- year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Grand Terrace and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study Very truly yours, WILLDAN Vanessa Munoz, P E , T E Traffic Engineer Enclosure Engineenng I Geotechnicai I Enmronmental I Suslainability I Financial I Homeland Security 562 908 6200 1 800 499 4484 1 tax. 582 695.2120 1 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Sude 405 Industry CA 91746 3443 1 www wflldan com (AoAjnS euoZ peadS 99n) n-v wia im aoejlal puejo ;uawyoew co A TABLE OF CONTENTS Y Page a INTRODUCTION , , , 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey SURVEY CONDITIONS Survey Locations Data Collection Speed Data , Collision Data Field Review Data ANALYSIS Criteria Results and Recommendations Table 1 - Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes Table 2 - Summary of Recommendations Segments with Special Conditions LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code APPENDIX A - Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B - Collision Rates APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used 2-3 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6-7 7 8 9 10 10-15 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Grand Terrace (AoAjnS euoZ peadS 99n) eowiel. puejo ivamioe;fib► ca o, Q co tG � a w d INTRODUCTION a This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Grand Terrace This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 14 street segments in the City of Grand Terrace Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriffs Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(13)(i)(1)] Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)] These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey 1 Measurement of prevailing speed, 2 Accident history, and 3 Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property " The posted speed limit gives motonsts a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Grand Terrace (AemnS euoZ peadS 99t,6) emjel puej!D 1u9wyos:Uy sa v Q co � a The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers Y behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal Speed limits °- established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January2012 specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed The 85t' percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below Options 1 The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358 5 2 For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85t'-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85t' percentile speed, if no further reduction is used Refer to CVC Section 21400(b) Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of Grand Terrace (Marian$ auoZ peadS 99tiq) eoeijal puea!D ;uowyae:gy Q `D a m If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit The reasons a for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358 5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria A Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down If the 85t' percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS B Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up If the 85t' percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS C Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up If the 851' percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions A segment that has an above -average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists A summary of the collision rates for the 14 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of Grand Terrace (AajunS ouoZ peadS 99ti6) ti6-6-ti :lead 1q3 eoejaal puejE) juewyogjV co C14 a co � a SURVEY CONDITIONS Y a SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the cnteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Grand Terrace The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following 1 Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence 2 Minimum visibility restrictions 3 Non -congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways 4 Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 14 locations during the month of September 2013 Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 14 locations during September 2013 All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 City of Grand Terrace (Aemng euoZ peadS qqt, ) e3Lw9l puej!D ;uawyoeRV Q Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database Forthis study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 The collision rates for the 14 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM) To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate R= Ax1,000,000 tx365 days xlxv year A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t = Time Period Covered (in years) / = Length of Segment (miles) v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors 1 Street width and alignment (design speed), 2 Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics, 3 Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns, 4 Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on -street parking, 5 Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices, 6 Visibility obstructions, 7 Land use and proximity to schools, 8 Pedestrian and bicycle usage, 9 Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions, and 10 Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 City of Grand Terrace (AanjnS euoZ peadS 99ti6) ti6-6-ti :lead 11S3 aaeiaal pueiE) ;uawyae:"b ca � Q v a ANALYSIS Y v t0 a CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 Some of the criteria used are A The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic The "bask speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85t' percentile speed B The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed C The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Grand Terrace RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2 In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358 5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions All prima facie Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of Grand Terrace (AanunS auoZ paadS 99t I,) aoeajal puea!D ;uawtIoe:gb► a � a speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code) This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions A prima n. facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments TABLE 7 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES No STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW CHANGE 5 DE BERRY ST MT VERNON AVE EAST TERMINUS 25 30 INCREASE 12 MT VERNON AVE VAN BUREN AVE MAIN ST 45 40 DECREASE 14 VAN BUREN AVE MT VERNON AVE OBSERVATION DR 25 30 INCREASE Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of Grand Terrace 6Aa I BARTON RD MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 40 41 40 2 BARTON RD MT VERNON AVE PRESTON ST 45 48 45 3 BARTON RD PRESTON ST EAST CITY LIMIT 45 48 45 4 DE BERRYST MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 35 38 35 5 DE BERRYST MT VERNON AVE EAST TERMINUS 25 35 30 6 MAIN ST IOWA AVE MICHIGAN ST 40 39 40 7 MAIN ST MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 40 44 40 8 MICHIGAN ST BARTON RD VAN BUREN AVE 35 39 35 9 MICHIGAN ST VAN BUREN AVE MAIN ST 35 40 35 10 MT VERNON AVE NORTH CITY LIMIT BARTON RD 40 44 40 11 MT VERNON AVE BARTON RD VAN BUREN AVE 40 43 40 12 MT VERNON AVE VAN BUREN AVE MAIN ST 45 40 40 13 PALM AVE BARTON RD HONEY HILLS DR 35 37 35 14 VAN BUREN AVE MT VERNON AVE OBSERVATION DR 25 34 30 ** = 25 mph when children are present CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 w d 0 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 N d CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 a� a to CLOSEST TO 857H SPEED 4i CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 0 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 t-I w m 0 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 L L d CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 F" c d CLOSEST TO 851H SPEED CLOSEST TO 857H SPEED E 0 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 Engineering and Traffic Survey 8 City of Grand Terrace Packet Pg 46 (AemnS euoZ peadS 99ti6) amue.L puwE) juawLi3q1y ca � Q co � a SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS Y v The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per a hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver Each segment is discussed below Segment #5 — De Berry Street — Mount Vernon Avenue to East Terminus This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,002 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential, with a school, and a community park The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve, heavy pedestrian traffic, and multiple uncontrolled crosswalks that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons Segment #9 — Michigan Street — Van Buren Avenue to Main Street This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 5,333 vehicles per day The adjacent land use is residential The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, due to a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons Engineering and Traffic Survey 9 City of Grand Terrace (AanjnS euoZ peadS 99t,6) aoejjal puejE) ;uauay:)e:RV �a v Q so � a w d LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES 0 a APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1 Section 627 of the Vehicle Code Section 627 (a) "Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements (2) Accident records (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver (c) When conducting an engineenng and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district a Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures b Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures c The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B) (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety Basic Speed Law 22350 No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property Speed Law Violations Section 22351 (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant Engineering and Traffic Survey 10 City of Grand Terrace (AananS euoZ peadS 99t,�) aaeajal puejlD ;uewyae�d �a � Q co � a establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a d violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and underthe conditions then existing a Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352 (a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof (1) Fifteen miles per hour A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals C) On any alley (2) Twenty-five miles per hour A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barner while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs maybe placed atanydistance up to 500 feet away from school grounds (C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs (b) This section shall become operative on March 1, 2001 Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 City of Grand Terrace (AemnS euoZ peadS 99tpl,) eoejial puejD ;uawyae7AV � Q o � m � a Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour Section 22357 Y C� a (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366 Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358 5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of otherfactors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions Boundary Line Streets Section 22359 With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions Speed Trap Prohibition Section 40801 No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 City of Grand Terrace (AoAjnS euoZ peadS 99t►�) ooejaal puej6 ;uauiyoe;;d a IL Speed Trap iv Y v Section 40802 a (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or22358 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal -aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet (B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445 (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction (2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign (c)(1) When all the following critena are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable (A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of Grand Terrace (AejunS euoZ peadS 99til,) eoeaial pueaD ;uewq:)e:gd Q co � a (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) The prosecution proved that, a prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D) (u) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or22406 (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance (13)(1) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects (1) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years (n) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803 (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or bythe maintenance or use of a speedtrap Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of Grand Terrace (AemnS auoZ peadS 991q) emiel puejE) 1uawyouRy �a � Q co an a (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where J enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the a evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802 Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of Grand Terrace aoeueL pueJD Jo Afro AanjnS p!4ejl pue 6uuaauiBu3 BIB(] JUGLUBGS hails V XiaN3ddV n U� Attachment Grand Terrace E&T_Draft 4-1-14 (1466 Speed Zone Survey) � (AaAjnS auoZ paadS 99ti6) aae.ijal puej0 ;uawyoe:RV ca CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET BARTON ROAD FROM MICHIGAN STREET CERTIFICATION DATE TO MOUNT VERNON AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2013 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 1500 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 37 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Average Speed 38 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 238 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 10 Annual Collision Rate 3 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1 211 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 15,712 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL & BIKE LANE ON SOUTH SIDE Type of Traffic Control T S @ MICHIGAN, TOWN SQUARE, CANAL, MT VERNON Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 480 miles Width 72 feet Vertical Curve? NO Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (IlananS auoZ peadS 99n) -Pi,-I,-ti :;lEua 11s3 aoe.ijal pue.j0 tuawyae;;br c� � CITY OF GRAND TERRACE a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Y v STREET BARTON ROAD CERTIFICATION DATE a FROM MOUNT VERNON AVENUE TO PRESTON STREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/11/2013 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 11 00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 44 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 48 mph Average Speed 45 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 41-50 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph Number of Survey Samples 281 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 3 Annual Collision Rate 1 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 249 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 10,278 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL & BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T S @ MT VERNON, PRESTON Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1 070 miles Width 72 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (Aan.mS euoZ paadS 99n) wmjjel. puei0 ivawyoew R Ln a CITY OF GRAND TERRACE a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY cc C� STREET BARTON ROAD CERTIFICATION DATE a.. FROM PRESTON STREET TO EAST CITY LIMIT Li SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/11/2013 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 1000 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 43 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 48 mph Average Speed 44 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 40-49 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph Number of Survey Samples 293 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 12,418 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2-4 LANES WITH TWLTL & BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T S @ PRESTON, HONEY HILUGRAND TERRACE Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES FROM PRESTON TO GLENDORA Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 700 miles Width 44-72 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AemnS euoZ peadS 99ti6) aaejjal pueq) ;uaWLIoe:Rd M co 14 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE F-74 a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Y t� STREET DE BERRY STREET CERTIFICATION DATE a FROM MICHIGAN STREET TO MOUNT VERNON AVENUE LJ SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2013 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1300 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 138 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,370 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T S @ MT VERNON, STOP @ MICHIGAN Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 44 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AejunS euoZ peadS 99tp6) eoejaal puej0 1uewyae7gy c� CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DE BERRY STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 1 FROM MOUNT VERNON AVENUE TO EAST TERMINUS SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2013 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph Time of Speed Survey 1000 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph VERTICAL CURVE, HEAVY PED 85th Percentile Speed 35 mph TRAFFIC, UNCONTROLLED XWALKS Average Speed 33 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 28_87 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 134 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0 67 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1 521 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,002 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SPEED BUMPS Type of Traffic Control T S @ MT VERNON Crosswalks? @ T S , WARBLER, ORIOLE Pedestrian Traffic HEAVY Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 600 miles Width 44 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use SCHOOL, PARK, RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION, I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AemnS ouoZ paadS 99b'i•) tib-4-ti end 1'83 eoeaaal puej0 ;uawgoeaV m co CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 61 a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY bd v STREET MAIN STREET CERTIFICATION DATE a FROM IOWA AVENUE TO MICHIGAN STREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/13/2013 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 900 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Average Speed 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 146 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 345 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,650 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2-3 LANES WITH RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T S @ MICHIGAN, GRAND TERRACE HIGH SCHOOL, IOWA Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic HEAVY Truck Traffic MODERATE On -Street Parking SOUTH SIDE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES FROM TRANSIT TO MICHIGAN Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS ' Length of Segment 1 000 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NO Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use SCHOOL, RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AananS auoZ paadS 99ti6) aoeaial puea0 tuauayae:gV ca CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MAIN STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM MICHIGAN STREET TO MOUNT VERNON AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/13/2013 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 1300 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Average Speed 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 37-46 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 122 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,460 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH BIKE LANE ON NORTH SIDE Type of Traffic Control T S @ MICHIGAN, STOP @ MT VERNON Crosswalks? @ T S , STOP Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0 500 miles 64 feet NO NO GOOD FAIR SOUTH SIDE RESIDENTIAL, PARK Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AaA.mS euoZ peadS 99t l;) eoejjal pue.,0 ;uawyaeffd ea CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MICHIGAN STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM BARTON ROAD TO VAN BUREN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2013 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1400 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 212 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 8,158 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T S @ BARTON, STOP @ DE BERRY, VAN BUREN Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 54-60 feet Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use NO NO GOOD POOR BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (/CananS euoZ peadS 99n) aowaai. puei0 ;uaurymav co � CITY OF GRAND TERRACE a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Y V STREET MICHIGAN STREET CERTIFICATION DATE a FROM VAN BUREN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/13/2013 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1000 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph VERTICAL CURVE, SEGMENT 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph UNIFORMITY Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 156 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 342 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 5,333 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control T S @ MAIN, STOP @ PICO, VAN BUREN Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 54 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AanunS auoZ peadS 99t i•) wmijel puejO ;uawq=7 V ea � CITY OF GRAND TERRACE a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MOUNT VERNON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE a FROM NORTH CITY LIMIT TO BARTON ROAD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/11 /2013 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 900 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Average Speed 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 291 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 8 Annual Collision Rate 2 67 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1 492 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 9,603 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 4 LANES Type of Traffic Control T S @ BARTON, STOP @ GRAND TERRACE Crosswalks? @ T S Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 510 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, SINGLE & MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (A9A.mS ouoZ peadS 99ti6) aoejjal puej0 ;uawyae:l;br �a CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MOUNT VERNON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM BARTON ROAD TO VAN BUREN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2013 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 900 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 38 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph 11 Average Speed 10 mph Pace Speed Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Survey Samples 39 mph 35-44 76 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph 223 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 175 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 10,466 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T S @ BARTON, DE BERRY, STOP @ VAN BUREN Crosswalks? @ T S , STOP Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways' BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NO Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting EAST SIDE Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AanunS euoz paadS 99n) aoeijal pueja ;uawyoew c� CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MOUNT VERNON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE [112 FROM VAN BUREN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/13/2013 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 11 00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph Average Speed 37 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 32-41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 134 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 033 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 219 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 8,344 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control STOP @ VAN BUREN, PICO, MAIN Crosswalks? @ STOP Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking NONE Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NO Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting EAST SIDE Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (AamnS auoZ peadS 99t l,) ti6-4-ti era 1'83 aaeijejL puej0 1uewyae:gV �v CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET PALM AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 13 FROM BARTON ROAD TO HONEY HILLS DRIVE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/11/2013 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1300 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Average Speed 33 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 122 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0 873 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,743 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control STOP @ BARTON Crosswalks? MID -BLOCK EAST OF BARTON Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0 600 miles Width 44 feet Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use YES NO GOOD FAIR BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete lam duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number (Aan.mS ouoZ peadS 99t'i•) eaeajal puej0 1uauayoe:gy CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 141 STREET VAN BUREN AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM MOUNT VERNON AVENUE TO OBSERVATION DRIVE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/13/2013 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph Time of Speed Survey 1500 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Average Speed 31 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 109 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0 33 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1 513 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,207 Date Counted 9/10/2013 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control STOP @ ORIOLE, MT VERNON Crosswalks? @ STOP Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On -Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES Length of Segment 0 500 miles Width 44 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By J L Checked By V M CERTIFICATION I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Grand Terrace was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic) TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number eoejjal puejE) jo ApC) Aanjng oyjejl pue 6uiaaaw6u3 swjo.i uoijngjajsia peeds iepeU Attachment Grand Terrace E&T_Draft_4-1-14 (1466 Speed Zone Survey) ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■i■■■■l ■■■N■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N ■■■■■■■■■■■■■!■ ■■■■■NN■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N ��■■■■■■■■■■iii ■N■N■■■iNi■■i■■ ■■iiiii■■■■■■■N ■iii■■■iii■■■■■ ■■iii■■■N■■■■■� ■■i■■■i■NN■■iN1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■!■■■CN■1 ■NNN■■■■N■■■■N■� f■■■■■■■■■■N■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� I■N■■N■■■■■NNiNN I■!■■N■■■■N■N■NN N■■■■N■■NNNNN■N� I■■■■■■■■■N■N!N v INNNNNNNN■NN■■■0 1■N■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■� ■Ni■■■■NN■N■■■N� IN■■■■■iNN■■■■■ 0 ■■■■■■■■■i■■iN!■■D• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ v Q101■■■N■■i■■■■0 QUE1110110�1111N looms looms looms looms f-L- Io■o■■■i■oio■i■© ��■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 SIMON SIMON DEMEEMEE+■oii0 DE+MEEMENIII■■0 �����■■■i■■■■i0 ���■■■■■■■■■■■i■0 DE+■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 E■■■ommoiiommoi© ■■■io■■om■■■■■■■0 ■■!■mm■■■omm■■■o !■■■io■lommi■o■0 I■■omm■■■■o■■■m0 I■i■■■■i■■■■■■■0 loommo■■■■o■■■■0 I■i■ommo■omm■■■■■EMIN liliii■ii■!■iii0 lii■■■i■■■i■■■■■0 l■■■■■■■!■■■iii0 li■!ii■i!!■■■ii0 loo■oo■ooi■o■■o0 I!■omm■■■ommo■■0 l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■oi000■■■■■■■■■NEINS I■■■■■■■■■mmo■o■WISS ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 E■■■■■■■■■■■■■I EE■■■■■■■■■■■■1 EEEE■■■■■■■■■■I EEEEE■■■■■■■■■I EEEEEE■■■■■■■■1 EEEEEE■■■■■■■■1 EEEEEEEE■■■■■■1 EEEEEEEEEEE■■■I EEEEEE4EEE+E+EE+E■1 EEEEEEEEEEEEE01 EEEEEEEEEEEEE■I EEEEEEEEEEEEE■I EEEEEEEEEEEE101 EEEEEEEEEEE1111 EEEEEEEEE100101 EEEEEEEEE■OEM ■1 EEEEEEE10010011 EEEE■■■■■■■■■■I EEEE■■■■■■■■■■1 EE■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■MSEE■■■■■N ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 E■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 E■■■■■■■■■■■■■® UKULE■■■■EMEME0 EEEEEEE■■■■■■■® EEEEEEEE■■■■■■NOMIN EEEEEEEEEEE■■■® EEEEEEEEEEEE■■® EEEEEEEEEEEEE■® EEEEEEEEEEEEE■® SIMON EEEEEEEE■■■■■■0 EEEEEEE■■■■■■■® EEEEE■■■■■■■■■0 EEE■■■■■■■■■■■0 EEE■■■■■■■■■■■0 EEE■■■■■■■■■■■0 EEE■■■■■■■■■■■0 EE■■■■■■■■■■■■© EE■■■■■■■■■■■■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■INGIN ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■v ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IO ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■10 SPEED (MPH) EASTBC t■■■RR■■■■■■■■1 64 !■■■■■1■!■■■■■I 63 ■■it■t■■■■f■i■I 62 ■■ii■■■■■■■■■■1 61 ■■■tit■i■i■i■■1 so ■■ii■t■RRR■■■■I 69 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I as ■■■■■■■i■■■ti■1 57 ■■■■■■■■l■■■■■1 56 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 as ■■■■■■■Rt■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■!■■■■■■■■I ■■ii■i■■■■■■■■I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 so i■tit■■t■■■■t■1 49 ■■ii■lift■■■■■I 48 47 ■■■1■■■!■■■■i!1 46 ■■■ilia■■■!■■■I 45 i■■■ii■■■■■■■■I 44 ■!it■■■■R■■R■■I 43 ■■■■■■■i!■!■■1 42 �+■■i■■!i■■■■■t1 41 ail!!■ill■■!i■I 40 �+�■■■■■■■■■■■■1 39 �+�■■■■i■i■■■■i1 38 DOME 12 loss ■■111 37 E2E2E2E2[2E2E2E+E+E2E+0101 36 E+EIE2E2E4■■■!■■■■■1 35 E2E+E2EE4F2E2111■■111 34 E4E2E2EiE2E2E+E2!!■0101 33 E+rEE4■■■11■■■11 32 0202■11■11■■■■I 31 F2E2E2F2■■■■■■■■■■1 30 E211■■1■■111■111 29 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 28 [2011■1■111■■■11 27 ■11■■■■111■■011 26 E21■■■■■■!■■■■!1 26 11■■■!■1■111111 24 t■11■■■1111Mi■1 23 ■1■■1111■■■■■11 22 ■■■■■■■■■■■■t!1 21 20 ■■■■■■■■■■■l■RI 19 is 17 116 is ■■■■!■■■■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■■■■■i■■1 ■■■i■■■R■■■iill ■■■■it!■■■ifiil ■■■iii■■■iii■■1 IR■ll■■■■l■■■ll0 11■■1■1■1■■■■110 I■■■■■l■■llt■■l0 11■■1■■1■■■■■11■0 I■■■■■■!■■■i■i■■■ONS I■■■■■!■■■!f■■■0 I■!■■!!!■■!■■■■■0 I■t■■■■■■t■t■■■■■GIN I■!■■■!■■t■■iii■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ORE D■!■■■■■■■i■■■■© 0111iiiiili■■■© MQUUM■■■■■■■■■■UNS EQUEM■■■!!■■■® MUMMURN■■■■■0 IMMIN A■■t■■ti■!■■■■0 11■■111■■■■■■■■0 1■1■1111■■■1■■■0 11111111■!!i■■■0 11111■1■■■1■■■■■0 SPEED (MPH) I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■f0 ■■■■■■■■f■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■f■■■■fO ■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■!■0 111■■i■■1■■illl �i■■i■1Noll ���■■ilia■■■■■I EIEE■■moll ■■Noll EEE02■■■■■■■■■I E+H402■■■■■Nonni ����■ii■1■■■111 �����■■111■1■i1 ���lii■■i■■■!i1 ■■i■■i■i■■■iiil ���■■■llli■1■■1 ���11■!11■1■■1! E41■1■■■11■■1■■1 021■■Olson ■MINI E2■1■■■■■1■11111 1■■1■■■11■11■■1 ■■1■■■■11ii1■■1 ,fir G.4:[a [�[�■■■■!■!!■■0 02020211son 1■INN 10 DEXE402■■■■■■11■ 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ d ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 ■!■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 1■111■■■■■■!■■i0 ■■■■■!■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■VEHICLES SURVEYED i■■■■■■■■■■i■■11■■■■■■■■i■■■■■0 ■■■iii■■!■i■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■!■■■■i!■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SIGNS ����!■■!■■■■■■IIi■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■i1���■i■■■■■■■■■0 RUM11■■■■■■■■1MHU'U'[■■■■■■■■0 EUMM.M.40,■■i■■i1DEEMINi■■i■■■■■!® EM40:4■■■■■■■■■■1�■■■■■■■■■■■0 EMEA■iloose i■■1 � �■■■■■■■■■■■0 EUMEM■■■i■NINE IIi■i■■■■■■■■■■■© EMMIREAMIE■■ Mosul Ii!■■■■■■■i■■■■ ■■!!■■■■■■■■■■I�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■10 ■■■■■■[■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ii!!■■iiiii■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■[■■■■■■■IIi■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■i■■i■■■i■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■i ■■■■■■i■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■i0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��l■■■■■■■■■!■■spa i■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■■slsl■■■sVEHICLES SURVEYED ■sllo■■■i■■■■■�■■■■■■■s■■■■■s0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■It■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 moss■■ 1■■1111s■1111110 SIGNS ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■s■■s■■■■■■■so ■s■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■m1si1■■mom■sue■■ monsoon !■■■■■■■■■■moss0 Monson EME'NO■■■■101111i�+���n111m1m11m0 M021111111111■MEM21soon !!■lmm0 EMEMEMEME101111 MEM21111111s1s® MEMEM111111■1 QM11 loss ■l■■■■■MIN SIMON SIMON E��■■!■■■■■■■■■!■sl■■ill■■■si■s© ■■l■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■11■■■■■© mil■■■■i■■llll��■l■■■ll■l■l■■■0 ■0 ■o ■■!!!■■!■■!!!!11■■!■■■■■■■■■■!t0 ■!■!■■■!1l!■■!!!■■■■■■!!10 ■■■!II■■■■■■■■■!!■■■0 F2EEE(E4RRKE2H4 AI I■■■■■!■■■■■■!■® EEUEEREIRH402EHDE202■■NINE ■!■!■0 DEREF2■NONE ■!■!!� HIHIloss !!!!llli���������■■!� HIDE MINE MONSOON ����■■■■■!■!!!!0 ERA loss ■!■■!l1ME+E2!!■■■■■■■■■■0 H4■!!■!■■!■■■■1EE2E2■■■■■!!!!■!!© ■■■!!■■!■■■!■■I��■■■■■■■■■■■■■l0 ■!■■■!!■!!■■!!11!!■■■!!■■■■!■■0 ■111■1111■■■■11 ■■■11■■111■1111 ■1111■111111111 ■11■■11111■1111 11■11■1111■■111 loom■■I■■■II1■1 ■1I■■1I11II■1■1 ■■0101011111■■I ■■1111■■■I1■1I1 ■1111II■1■1■I■1 E■1II1■■I1I1I■1 ■■■III■■I■■■1■1 ■11111111111111 ■I■11■■111111■1 ■1■1■01111■11■I ■■II■■■■■IIIIII EIIII■■■■■I■I11 E■E■■M■■■■EME■N HIII■■■■■III■I M111■■■11■1111 MII1■■I1III■1 EMEEIIIIIII■I EMEENI11I1I■1 MEMI1■1I■■1 MEEME■■■■■■I EMEEMENI■■1 EMEMEE1■■■1 EVEMEMEN■■1 EMEMEN1III1 MEREMI■I■111 EMEE■■■■■1■■1 EEME11I■■I■■I EMENIII■■■■■I MI11I1I11I■I1 MIN■■II11I1■■1 MINI■■1II■■■I E11■■■111■10111 ■11■■■111■■■■■1 111111111111111 ■■■■■■■11■11111 111■■■1111■1111 ■1■■11I11■■■111 111111INIMINI■1 ■1■■■II■■■■■■■I ■■11I1■■■■1■■11 ■1111111■■■■II1 ■■■1II11■■■■1■1 ■1■111■11■■■1■1 ■■■1II11I1111I1 ■■1II1111111111 ■o1mr1m■■■■■■■m ■■■1■1■■■■■■■■! ■■■■■■■11111111 ■■111■11■1■■1■I ■■11■11■■■■11■1 020202021NONE ■1 E2021■11■■■11■■1 EMM■■■■■■■■■■I FA■■■■■■■■■■■■! E20211■■■■■■■■■1 121ME2+■■■■■1■■■11 IMAIR■■■11■■■I E2■■1■1111111111 ■■11■■111111111 111111■■■■■■1■1 ■■■■1■■■■■■11■I ■11111■11!!1■11 ■11■1■1■1■■■■■1 ■■1■■■■■111■111 ■■■11■111111■■1 ■■11■1■1■■■■1■1 1111111■■■■1111 ■■■1■■1111■1111 ■1■1■1111■1■■11 ■v■■tt■■tttttt■ 11■111■111■■1■■0 111■11■11■■■■■10 111111■■■1■■1■■0 I■■■■■1■■■■■■■■0 I■1■■■■■■■■■■■■0 11■111■1■■■■■■■0 1■■■■■■■■■■■1■10 1■1■1■■■■■11■110 11101■■■■■■■■■■0 1■1■■■1■■■■■■■1 0 1■11■■■■■■■■■110 ■■t■■■■■■■■tt■■ o Q■111■■■11■■■11 0 1■■■■■■■!■1■■■■ 0 1■1■■■■■111■1110 M■1■■■■■1■■■1■0 ��■■■1■■■■■■■■■0 QREM■■■■■■■■■® DVEEM■■■■1■■■IMMIN SIMON MEE11111■■11■■® ME11■■111■■11■0 DER■■■■■■■■1■■10 D■■■■■■■■■■■11■© ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■1■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■1■■■■■0 ■■■■!■■■■■■■■0 ■■!■1■■■■1■11Iv ■■■1■11■■■■■■0 ■■■tttttt■tt■o Ronson ■■■■■■■■II■■o1■■■m■■■■■■0 ■■moss■■■■■■mmI Ills■m■ommos■o■s0 monsoon mmsmmlm!!o■li■■■om■■■lsRISEN ■■11■lmmmmm11m111■s■■mommo■■■mRISEN elm■■lsss■smmsll■■■■■■lmm■■■ssai E-02■■111111■111�1ss■■■■■■■■■■■0 Ell■111■■1111l���■■■■miss■■■s© HEINIIIIIIIIII EMEMMANNOMMIll ����nmmm■■lllml�����■■■■■■Rosso EEMEM4111■11long � � ■■slsss■■sl0 ■■■■■■m■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■n 0 SIGNS ■■■■■■■■■11■■■Ills■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■!!■I■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■v I■■■!■■■■!■■■■!0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■1■■■■■!■■■■!■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■!■■■■■■■■■■0 Q■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 Il■■■■■■!■■■■■!0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 :■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 MEEloss MINE ■NOUNS :NMEMEM■■■■■■■■® ME+EMEMEMF2■■ISO ® A!■■■■■■■■■■■■© i ! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SIDES I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■!■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■I■■■0 I■■■■!■■■■■■■■■0 I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o a:)ejial puejE) jo Alto AaninS :)!.4eil pue 6uuaawfu3 SOJBN UOISII103 8 xiaN3ddV CO I Attachment Grand Terrace E&T Draft_4-1-14 (1466 Speed Zone Survey) 6Aa No. Street From Table ® • To. _(A)Yeaes ` 'Mi... Collisions •. • .. . L6ngth of Accident Rate Accident Rate* 1 BARTON RD MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 10 15,712 048 121 160 2 BARTON RD MT VERNON AVE PRESTON ST 3 10,278 107 1 07 1 60 3 BARTON RD PRESTON ST EAST CITY LIMIT 0 12,418 070 000 160 4 DE BERRY ST MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 0 2,370 050 000 255 5 DE BERRY ST MT VERNON AVE EAST TERMINUS 2 2,002 060 152 255 6 MAIN ST IOWA AVE MICHIGAN ST 1 2,650 1 00 035 255 7 MAIN ST MICHIGAN ST MT VERNON AVE 0 2,460 050 000 255 8 MICHIGAN ST BARTON RD VAN BUREN AVE 0 8,158 050 000 255 9 MICHIGAN ST VAN BUREN AVE MAIN ST 1 5,333 050 034 255 10 MT VERNON AVE NORTH CITY LIMIT BARTON RD 8 9,603 051 149 200 11 MT VERNON AVE BARTON RD VAN BUREN AVE 1 10,466 050 018 200 12 MT VERNON AVE VAN BUREN AVE MAIN ST 1 8,344 050 022 200 13 PALM AVE BARTON RD HONEY HILLS DR 1 1,743 060 087 255 14 VAN BUREN AVE MT VERNON AVE OBSERVATION DR 1 1,207 050 151 255 Engineenng and Traffic Survey City of Grand Terrace m Z d 0 N as a� a U) Packet P9787571 amial puejo jo Apo AanmS aL4ejl pue 6uuaau►6u3 juewdinb3 AetunS o xiaN3ddV CD i Fml Attachment Grand Terrace E$T Draft_4-1-14 (1466 Speed Zone Survey) (AananS auoZ peadS 99tp6) t+b-b-ti eaa 1'83 ooejjal puejE) ;uawyoe4jV �a a SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was a K-15 Model Hand -Held traffic Radar manufactured by MPH Industries of Owensboro, Kentucky The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications The K-15 Hand -Held Traffic Radar was last calibrated on October 16, 2012 by RHF Inc Engineenng and Traffic Survey City of Grand Terrace 6Ab ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 10 08 SPEED LIMITS IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace, through its Traffic Consultant, has conducted an Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Grand Terrace, which included speed zone and field surveys on Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue, and WHEREAS, the Traffic Consultant evaluated traffic conditions and street hazards in each area --NOW THEREFORE,- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 The City Council hereby repeals and replaces in its entirety Chapter 10 08 of Title 10 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, as follows "Chapter 10 08 Speed Limits Sections 10 08 010 Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue — Findings 10 08 020 Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue — Limits Designated Section 10 08 010 Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue — Findings The City Council finds, pursuant to traffic and engineering studies conducted in 2013, that speed limits on Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue are hereby established and certified to provide for the protection of the general public and facilitate the orderly movement of traffic in a reasonable and safe manner 10 08 020 Barton Road, DeBerry Street, Main Street, Michigan Street, Mount Vernon Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Van Buren Avenue — Limits Designated Packet Pg 88 6Ab The prima facie speed limit shall be set forth in this section on those streets designated as follows when signs are erected giving notice thereof A Barton Road from Michigan Street to Mount Vernon Avenue, 40 Miles Per Hour B Barton Road from Mount Vernon Avenue to Preston Street, 45 Miles Per Hour C Barton Road from Preston Street to East City Limits, 45 Miles Per Hour D DeBerry Street from Michigan Street to Mount Vernon Avenue, 35 Miles Per Hour E DeBerry Street from Mount Vernon Avenue to East Terminus, 30 Miles Per Hour F Main Street from Iowa Avenue to Michigan Street, 40 Miles Per Hour G Main Street from Michigan Street to Mount Vernon Avenue, 40 Miles Per Hour H Michigan Street from Barton Road to Van Buren Avenue, 35 Miles Per Hour I Michigan Street from Van Buren Avenue to Main Street, 35 Miles Per Hour J Mount Vernon Avenue from North City Limits to Barton Road, 40 Miles Per Hour K Mount Vernon Avenue from Barton Road to Van Buren Avenue, 40 Miles Per Hour L Mount Vernon Avenue from Van Buren Avenue to Main Street, 40 Miles Per Hour M Palm Avenue from Barton Road to Honey Hill Drive, 35 Miles Per Hour N Van Buren Avenue from Mount Vernon Avenue to Observation Drive, 30 Miles Per Hour" SECTION 2 Posting The City Clerk shall post this Ordinance in three (3) public places within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purposes by the City Council SECTION 3. This ordinance was introduced at a public hearing held at the regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 10th day of June, 2014 and was adopted and order posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 24th day of June, 2014 ATTEST City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 3 a� Z d c N d d a W Packet Pg 89 6Ab I, , City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 24th day of June, 2014, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg 90 Cn d c 0 N d d 0. co AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council & Successor Agency Item TITLE Additional Information Related to Child Care Proposed Rates for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ATTACHMENT 7A(D) Now Included PRESENTED BY Cathy Varela, Director of Child Care Services RECOMMENDATION 1 Consider, receive and file additional information regarding consideration of proposed rate increase for Grand Terrace Child Care Services for Fiscal Year 2014-2015, and, 2 Provide staff with further direction on the adoption of proposed rate increase for Grand Terrace Child Care Services for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 BACKGROUND On May 27, 2014, Council was presented with a proposal to raise the Child Care Services fee by 5 3% for Fiscal Year 2014-15 The 5 3% increase would cover minimum wage increases effective July 1, 2014 and provide the Child Care Services Fund with an initial reserve of $40,000 After review and deliberation, Council requested staff to perform additional research and perform a cost -benefit analysis on the impact of raising Child Care Services fees by 6% and/or 7% and present the results to Council on June 10, 2014 DISCUSSION As provided to Council on May 27, 2014, the initial proposed rate of 5 3% will provide the Child Care Services Fund with a reserve balance of $40,000 As Council requested, staff increased Child Care rates by 6% and 7%, respectively Attachment "A" provides the incremental and total amounts by program for Council's review The Table below shows the effects of the increase in Child Care rates as requested by Council Description 2014-15 Base 5 3% Increase 6% Increase 7% Increase Revenues $1,139,350 $1,199,750 $1,207,860 $1,219,150 Expenditures (1,129,010) (1,159,410) (1,159,410) (1,159,410) Reserves - (40,000) (47,700) (59,400) Net ($9,660) $340 $340 $340 As shown in the table above, a 6% increase in rates reflects an additional $7,700 to reserves, while a 7% increase provides an additional $19,700 for reserves Attachment Packet Pg 91 "B" provides the detailed revenue and expense statements for all potential rates Council also requested rates charged by other child care facilities if staff is was able to obtain that information Attachment "C" provides Council with other child care facility rates broken down by program and compares these rates to the Child Care Center's different proposed rates For reference and information, Attachment "D" includes the previous staff report concerning Child Care rates from the May 27, 2014 Council Meeting 19 t+'%1_14 hTi 17,T041 0 It is anticipated, if any of the above rates are approved, that Child Care will generate additional revenue to cover the additional cost of the minimum wage increases and initial reserve requirements To increase Child Care rates requires a 10-day notice prior to the adoption of the new rates The public meeting and approval of the new Child Care rates will be scheduled for June 24, 2014 if the Council desires to proceed with the proposed rate increase ATTACHMENTS • Child Care Services Rate Table • Child Care Revenue & Expense statements • other facilities rates • Child Care Fees Rpt 05-27-14 APPROVALS Cathy Varela Completed 06/02/2014 3 02 PM Finance Completed 06/02/2014 5 52 PM City Attorney Completed 06/02/2014 6 53 PM City Manager Completed 06/02/2014 7 24 PM City Council Pending Packet Pg 92 7Aa City of Grand Terrace Child Care Services - Rates (incremental increase) Program trained, Current Rate FY13 14 Resident Non - Resident Child Care Center (Weekly) Kangaroo, 6 weeks - 2 years Full Time Turtles, 2 - 3 1/2 years 20250 20650 Part Time 13550 13800 Full Time 180 50 18375 Giraffe, Alligator & Monkeys, Potty Trained, 3 - 5 years (If not potty Turtle rate applies) Part Time 10975 11200 Full Time 15475 15800 School Age Program (Weekly) Kindergarten Part Time 9525 9750 Full Time 131 00 13325 1 st - 6th Grade Part Time 7350 _ —74 75 Full Time 8925 90 75 Off Track - No Lunch Part Time 10400 10600 _ _ Full Time 14800 15075 Tiny Tot Fun Club (Monthly) Two (2) Days 101 50 10775 Three (3) Days 12925 13775 wow New Student Registration 65 00 6500 Annual Registration 4000 4000 " Part Time 1 3 days or 5 one half days " Full Time 4 5 days Proposed Rate 5 3% Resident Non - Resident 1075 725 950 575 825 11 00 725 975 600 825 500 525 700 700 400 400 475 475 550 550 775 800 550 575 675 725 Proposed Rate 6% �- Resident Non- Resident 1225 1250 825 825 1075 11 00 650 675 925 950 575 575 775 800 450 450 525 550 625 625 900 900 600 650 775 825 Proposed Rate 7% Resident Non - Resident 1425 950 1275 1450 975 1275 775 775 1075 675 925 525 625 725 1025 1100 675 925 525 6 25 750 1050 700 750 900 975 uF 17 v 0 N cLC m m N m N c m m tr d m U .c U w z z O U PacketPg 93 7Aa City of Grand Terrace Child Care Services - Proposed Rates Program trained, Current Rate FY13-14 Resident Non - Resident Child Care Center (Weekly) Kangaroo, 6 weeks - 2 years Full Time 20250 20650 Turtles, 2 - 3 1/2 years Part Time 13550 13800 Full Time 18050 18375 Giraffe, Alligator & Monkeys, Potty Trained, 3 - 5 years (If not potty Turtle rate applies) Part Time 10975 11200 Full Time 15475 15800 WANOWN School Age Program (Weekly) Kindergarten Part Time 9525 9750 Full Time _ 131 00 13325 1 st - 6th Grade w....4.r...�. Part Time 7350 7475 Full Time 8925 9075 Off Track - No Lunch Part Time 10400 10600 Full Time 148 00 15075 Tiny Tot Fun Club (Monthly) Two (2) Days 101 50 10775 Three (3) Days 12925 13775 New Student Registration 65001 6500 Annual Registration 40001 40 00 Part Time 1- 3 days or 5 one half days " Full Time 4 5 days Proposed Rate 5 3% Resident Non - Resident 21325 21750 14275 14525 19000 19350 11550 11800 16300 16625 10025 10275 13800 14025 7750 7875 9400 9550 w.�.wrr 10950 111 50 15575 _ 15875 10700 11350 13600 14500 6500 6500 40 00 4000 Proposed Rate 6% Resident Non - Resident 21475 21900 14375 14625 19125 �...,. 19475 ., 11625 11875 16400 16750 101 00 10325 13875 14125 7800 7925 94 50 9625 11025 11225 15700 u�errrwiws 15975 �..+�. 10750 11425 13700 14600 65 00 65 00 40001 4000 Proposed Rate 7% Resident Non - Resident 21675 221 00 14500 14775 19325 19650 11750 11975 16550 16900 10200 10425 14025 14250 7875 8000 9550 97 00 11125 11350 15825 16125 10850 11525 138 25 14750 65 0000 6b00 40 00 LO T 0 N (D d N a= d U) M m L %i c m 0 tY m �La U .c U 0 w M z z O U Packet Pg 94 7Ab REVENUES Returned Check Fees Tiny Tot Program After School Program Pre -School Program EXPENDITURES Salaries & Benefits Materials & Supplies Professional/Contractual Svcs Utilities Fixed Charges Equipment Capital Projects Overhead Cost Allocation RESERVE DESIGNATION Reserved for Contingencies Revenues Expenditures Reserves NET 2014-15 City of Grand Terace Child Care Services Fund FY2014-15 Proposed Revenues and Expenditures 5 3% Base Department Proposed Budget Requests Amount 83,800 4,400 88,200 340,800 18,100 358,900 714,750 37,900 752,650 1,139,350 60,400 1,199,750 828,310 10,400 838,710 54,600 - 54,600 24,200 - 24,200 23,300 - 23,300 8,000 - 8,000 400 - 400 11,400 - 11,400 198,800 - 198,800 1,149,010 10,400 1,159,410 - 40,000 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 1,139, 350 60,400 1,199,750 1,149, 010 10,400 1,159,410 - 40,000 40,000 (9,660) 10,000 340 6 0% Department Proposed Requests Amount 5,000 88,800 20,400 361,200 42,900 757,650 68,300 1,207,650 10,400 838,710 - 54,600 - 24,200 - 23,300 - 8,000 - 400 - 11,400 198,800 10,400 1,159,410 47,900 47,900 47,900 47,900 68,300 1,207,650 10,400 1,159,410 47,900 47,900 10,000 340 7 0% Department Proposed Requests Amount 5,900 89,700 23,900 364,700 50,000 764,750 79,800 1,219,150 10,400 838,710 - 54,600 - 24,200 - 23,300 - 8,000 - 400 - 11,400 - 198,800 10,400 1,159,410 59,400 59,400 59,400 59,400 79,800 1,219,150 10,400 1,159,410 59,400 59,400 10,000 340 Packet Pg 95 7Ac Age Part-time (PT) or Full-tim (FT) Infants FT 2-3 1 /2 r PT 2-3 1 /2 r FT *3-5 PT 3-5 FT Kinder PT Kinder FT 1 sc-6th PT 1 sc-6th FT Off T PT Off T FT Grand Terrace Child Care Services 2014 Rate Survey of Four (4) Local Facilities Weekly Rates Listed Teddy Kinder Tutor Time Bear Care Thymes Colton Kinder Child Care Center Care 5 3% 6% 7% Bloomington $265 00 $242 00 $261 00 $250 00 17700 17600 14700 13700 20800 24200 19500 18200 16400 13000 13700 13000 20400 17900 19000 17900 13500 N/A 111 00 8600. 15900 N/A 14800 11400 11300 N/A 10000 8600. 12500 N/A 11900 10000 15000 N/A 135 00 11800 185 00 N/A 182001 16200 Resident Resident Resident $213 25 $214 75 $216 75 14275 17375 14500 19000 191 25 19325 11550 11625 11750 16300 16400 16550 10025 101 00 10200 13800 13875 14025 7750 7800 7875 9400 94,50 9550 109 501 11025 111 25 155751 15700, 158 25 0 w M z z 0 0 Packet Pg 96 7Ad TITLE PRESENTED BY AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council & Successor Agency Item Grand Terrace Child Care Rate Increase Review for FY 2014-2015 Cathy Varela, Director of Child Care Services RECOMMENDATION 1 Receive and file report regarding consideration of proposed rate increase for Grand Terrace Child Care Services for Fiscal Year 2014-15 2 Provide direction on the adoption of proposed rate increase for Grand Terrace Child Care Services for Fiscal year 2014-15 BACKGROUND On July 1, 2012, Child Care Services was moved from the General Fund into its own c Special Revenue Fund as requested and approved by City Council It was intended that III M the Child Care Services Fund be self-supporting, including charging the fund a cost Z allocation for general government services provided by the City This includes payroll, o invoice and purchasing processing, human resources support, City Manager, City Attorney and other administrative functions For FY 2012-2013 and FY 2013-2014, rate increases were requested and approved by Council in order for the Child Care Program to continue being self-supporting r DISCUSSION Minimum Wage Requirements effective July 1, 2014 California recently passed AB10, which approved the first minimum wage increase since 2008 The existing law raises the California minimum wage from $8 00/hour to $9 00/hour effective July 1, 2014 As indicated in the mid -year report, this minimum wage increase impacts the Child Care's operating expenditures for FY2014-2015 Currently, most of Child Care personnel are paid at either the required minimum wage level of $9 00/hour, or higher Two positions are affected by the implementation of this law and will result in increased salary and benefit costs totaling $10,400 c Fund Balance Reserve Requirements E Fund Balance reserves are set aside to provide an organization the ability to respond to Q revenue shortfall or unanticipated expenditures The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends that a reserve, equivalent to two (2) months of Packet Pg 97 7Ad general operating revenues, or expenditures, be set -aside for these purposes Although the Child Care Fund is not a general fund, it is recommended a minimal amount be set aside for contingencies The Child Care Fund has had several unforeseen expenditures over the last three (3) years, as follows • water pipe damage, mechanical repairs for the Child Care transportation vehicle, • fire and burglar alarm system repairs, and • additional required termite treatment at the Child Care Center An initial funding of $40,000 is requested to cover any future revenue shortfalls or unplanned expenditures for FY2014-15 In addition, Child Care Services has seen increases in current contractual obligations which include utilities, food and snacks for their various programs The mandatory minimum wage increase, the setting aside of funds for future contingencies and increases in contractual obligations total $60,400 An increase of 5 3% to the current rates will cover these additional costs Rate Increase The following facilities were surveyed to determine current market rates - Tutor Time in Highland - Teddy Bear Tymes in San Bernardino - KinderCare in Bloomington and - KinderCare in Colton Based on the results of the survey, adding the 5 3% increase to the City's current child care rates will still be, on the average, 12% less than the rates at the facilities listed above When staff learned of the minimum wage increase requirement, all current, enrolled families were informed Child Care Center rates could increase by 7% to 9%, effective July 1, 2014 The proposed 5 3% increase will result in an additional cost per child of $32-$40 per month for a full-time infant, or $6 75-$7 25 per month for a Tiny Tot full- time participant 0 w M z P z 0 0 Below is a list of the current rates charged, and proposed rates with the increase, which " w would become effective, if approved by the Council, at the start of the new school year d (July 30, 2014) for elementary school students in the Colton Joint Unified School = District o w a Packet Pg 98 7Ad Current Rates FY 13-14 Proposed Rates FY 14-15 Program Resident Non -Resident Resident Non -Resident Child Care Center - Weekly Kangaroo 6 Weeks - 2 years Full time $202 50 $206 50 $213 25 $217 50 Turtles 2 - 3'/z years Part time $135 50 $138 00 $142 75 $145 25 Full time $180 50 $183 75 $190 00 $193 50 Giraffe, Alligator and Monkeys Potty Trained 3 - 5 yrs (If not Potty Trained Turtle rate applies) Part time $109 75 $112 00 $115 50 $118 00 Full time $154 75 $158 00 $163 00 $166 25 School Age Program -Weekly Kindergarten Part time $95 25 $97 50 $100 25 $102 75 Full time $131 00 $133 25 $138 00 $140 25 1S - 6 Grade Part time $73 50 $74 75 $77 50 $78 75 Full time $89 25 $90 75 $94 00 $95 50 Off Track - No Lunch Part Time $104 00 $106 00 $109 50 $111 50 Off Track - No Lunch Full Time $148 00 $150 75 $155 75 $158 75 Tiny Tot Fun Club- Monthly Two Days $101 50 mo $107 75 mo $107 00 $113 50 Three Days 1 $129 25 mo $135 75 mo $136 00 $145 00 New Student Registration Child Care Center & School Age $65 00 $65 00 Tiny Tots $65 00 $65 00 Annual Registration Child Care Center & School Age $40 00 $40 00 Tiny Tots $40 00 $40 00 LO T 4 T 0 N L d N LL m rn �a d L c a� w R U v s U G w z F- z 0 U Q Packet Pg 99 7Ad Part Time 1-3 days Full Time 4-5 days FISCAL IMPACT If the proposed rate increases are approved, Child Care will generate additional revenue of $60,400, which will cover increased expenditures Attachment A reflects the proposed revenues and expenditures of the Child Care Services Fund for FY2014-15 The proposed new Child Care rates will be scheduled for consideration and adoption on June 10, 2014, or on a date required otherwise by law, if the Council desires to proceed with the proposed rate increase ATTACHMENTS • Child Care Proposed FY2014-15 Budget APPROVALS Cathy Varela Completed 05/20/2014 7 38 AM Finance Completed 05/20/2014 8 27 PM City Attorney Completed 05/20/2014 10 10 PM City Manager Completed 05/21/2014 8 39 AM City Council Completed 05/29/2014 4 56 PM �i T O N W d M 0 W LL d fA t0 a� a� U U c ur D z P z 0 U zo Packet Pg 100 7Ad City of Grand Terace Child Care Services Fund FY2014-15 Proposed Revenues and Expenditures 2014-15 Base Department Budget Requests Proposed Amount REVENUES Returned Check Fees - - - Tiny Tot Program 83,800 4,400 88,200 After School Program 340,800 18,100 358,900 Pre -School Program 714,750 37,900 752,650 1,139,350 60,400 1,199,750 EXPENDITURES Salaries & Benefits 828,310 10,400 838,710 Materials & Supplies 54,600 - 54,600 Professional/Contractual Svcs 24,200 - 24,200 Utilities 23,300 - 23,300 Fixed Charges 8,000 - 8,000 Equipment 400 - 400 Capital Projects 11,400 - 11,400 Overhead Cost Allocation 198,800 - 198,800 1,149,010 10,400 1,159,410 RESERVE DESIGNATION Reserved for Cotingencies Revenues Expenditures Reserves NET 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 1,139,350 60,400 1,149,010 10,400 - 40,000 (9,660) 10,000 1,199,750 1,159,410 40,000 340 LO 0 N L m To N_ LL am 0 W d L c m d L V .c v G w M z H z O U Packet Pg 101 This page left intentionally blank N111111119 PRESENTED BY AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council & Successor Agency Item Five -Year General Fund Projection Cynthia Fortune, Finance Director RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file the General Fund Five -Year projection included in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2014-15, and, 2) Continue budget deliberations on the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2014-15 BACKGROUND On May 13, 2014, City Council was provided with an overview of the City's FY2014-15 Proposed Budget On May 27, 2014, additional detail was provided to Council on the proposed FY2014/2015 budget requests After review and analysis, the City Council took action approving all FY2014-15 proposed budget requests submitted for its approval DISCUSSION. As part of the FY2014-15 proposed budget, submitted for the Council's review is the General Fund five-year projection of revenues and expenditures In cases where more precise or specific information was not available, or applicable, economic forecast information was used to determine an appropriate inflationary factor relative to the five- year revenue and expenditure projections Additional information is taken from a recent projection from the Rosenow, Spevacek Group (RSG), the City's property tax consultant It should be noted that the City's major revenue sources, such as property tax and sales tax, are projected based on data and analyses specific to the City, utilizing outside consulting expertise, rather than applying generalized growth or inflationary factors Likewise, key expenditure categories, such as personnel -related expenses and contractual services, are projected based on factors specific to the City Tax increment financing allowed redevelopment agencies to capture increased property tax revenue in their project areas to fund redevelopment activities Once a project area was designated, and a redevelopment plan was adopted, a base year was set for property tax revenues All of the other taxing entities in the project area (e g , school districts, city and county governments, flood control districts, library districts, etc ) had their property tax revenue frozen at this base year level Any increased tax revenue above the base year level went to the redevelopment agency until the redevelopment Packet Pg 102 project ended This is important to keep in my mind when considering the assumptions and data below Revenues When projecting revenues for the five-year projection, the revenue estimates were based upon the following assumptions - receipt of on -going funds of $300,000 in annual lease payments from the waste water agreement between the Cities of Grand Terrace and Colton, - General Fund property taxes are frozen, since all of City Grand Terrace is part of the former redevelopment project area, all increased tax revenue goes to the Successor Agency, - Licenses, Fees and Permits are projected to increase by $50,000 annually due to the implementation of the City's strategic plan, and, - annual increase of revenues at 3% for the other revenues, - additional RPTTF receipts as provided by RSG property tax consultants based on their initial projection and percentage of the City's last distribution allocation, - assumes overpayment by the County of RPTTF totaling $360,000 based on the volatility of prior distributions, and - assumes payment of $200,000 against overpayment is deducted in FY2014-15 with the balance deducted in FY2015-16 Expenditures Expenditure adjustments were based on the following assumptions - Increase in Sheriffs contract of 4 5%, - Reinstatement of one (1) sheriff deputy beginning in FY2015-16 (policy decision that requires City Council approval), - Increase in CalPERS retirement contribution of 4 5%, - Assumptions for Salaries & benefits - continuance of the 36-hour (4-day) work week for City Hall staff and corresponding 10% reduction, - continued suspension of merit increases, - cost -of -living adjustment (COLA) increase of 5% in FY2015-16 and 3% in the following years (policy decision that requires City Council approval), and - Annual increase of 2% for non -personnel related costs It should be noted that these are projections only, the development of which has not been coordinated with the County of San Bernardino Based, however, on the significant amount of additional RPTTF funds the City's property tax consultant is projecting, staff thought it prudent to provide Council with this additional information The Proposed Budget for FY2014-15 will be submitted to City Council for adoption on Packet Pg 103 June 24, 2014 FISCAL IMPACT City Council approved the FY2014-15 proposed budget requests which will be incorporated in the FY2014-15 Proposed Budget and presented to City Council for adoption on June 24, 2014 ATTACHMENTS • General Fund 5-Yr Projection APPROVALS Cynthia Fortune Completed Finance Completed City Attorney Completed City Manager Completed City Council Pending 06/03/2014 7 20 PM 06/03/2014 7 22 PM 06/03/2014 7 31 PM 06/04/2014 10 07 AM Packet Pg 1074 7Ba City of Grand Terrace General Fund Five Year Projection 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Projected Projected Protected Projected Projected REVENUES Property Tax 1 414 000 1 414 000 1 414 000 1414,000 1 414 000 Residual Receipts - RPTTF 306,370 315,600 325,100 334 900 344 900 Additional RPTTF per RSG estimate 200,000 274,400 302,900 338,100 380,100 Possible Overpymt reduction from RPTTF (200 000) (160,000) - - - Franchise Fees 480 000 494 400 509,200 524,500 540,200 Licenses Fees & Permits 276 200 326 200 376 200 426 200 476 200 Sales Tax 1 047 000 1 078 400 1 110 800 1 144 100 1,178,400 Intergovernmental Revenue/Grants 35,000 36 100 37,200 38,300 39,400 Charges for Services 81,200 83,600 86,100 88,700 91 400 Fines & Forfeitures 25,000 25 800 26 600 27 400 28 200 Miscellaneous 5,000 5,200 5,400 5 600 5 800 Use of Money & Property 25,000 25 800 26 600 27 400 28,200 Waste Water Lease Agreement 700 000 300 000 300 000 300 000 300 000 4,394 770 4 219 500 4 520 100 4 669 200 4 826 800 EXPENDITURES City Council 64,750 65 266 65 592 65 929 66 276 City Manager 404,506 340 946 337,834 340,152 342 576 Information Technology 66 100 67 300 68 700 70 100 71,500 Senior Citizens Program 30 500 31 000 31,500 32 000 32 600 City Clerk 131 292 121,053 135,517 121 623 137,752 Historical & Cultural Commission 1 200 1,200 1200 1 200 1 200 Finance 379,970 382,434 388,529 395 532 402,748 City Attorney 73 000 74,400 75 900 77 400 78 900 Law Enforcement 1 626 200 1 956,800 2,044,900 2 136 900 2,233,100 Budding & Safety 175 527 183,501 182 661 184,588 186 545 Public Works 252 751 249 241 246 920 249,560 252 252 Rental Inspection Program 101,260 101 950 102,672 103427 104,216 Enforcement Program 191,570 198 607 201,224 205 224 209,324 Facilities Maintenance 122 197 107 900 110,100 112 400 114 700 Community Development 159,194 142,779 140 318 141,325 142 378 Parks Maintenance 168 500 146,580 149 069 151,666 154 273 NPDES 96,050 111 321 112 713 114,128 115 566 Storm Drain Maintenance 16,000 16 100 16,400 16 700 17,000 Planning Commission 4 500 4,500 4 500 4,500 4 500 Emergency Oper Program 11 000 11 100 11 200 11,300 11 400 Non -Departmental 667,700 680 200 692,900 705,900 719 000 O/H Cost Allocation (317 900) (317 900) (317 900) (317 900) (317 900) 4 425 867 4,676 278 4 802 448 4 923 652 5 079 906 Revenues 4 394 770 4219,500 4 520 100 4,669,200 4 826 800 Expenditures (4 425 867) (4 676 278) (4 802 448) (4 923 652) (5 079 906) Revenues less Expenditures (31 097) (456 778) (282,348) (254 452) (253,106) Prior Year FY2013-14 additional savings 112 000 80 903 - - NET - Surplus/(Deficit) 80 903 (375 875) (282 348) (254 452) (253 106) PacketPg 105 0 � At1D TEi�$ ee MEETING DATE AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council Item TITLE Appointment of Planning Commission Members to the Planning Commission NOTE AMENDED ATTACHMENT NOW INCLUDED, NOT PRINTED WHEN ORIGINALLY DISTRIBUTED PRESENTED BY Sandra Molina, Interim Community Development Director RECOMMENDATION Conduct interviews and take the following actions 1) Appoint a Planning Commission member for the remainder of the vacated term to expire on June 30, 2016, and, 2) Appoint three Planning Commission members to fill three new four-year terms expiring on June 30, 2018 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is a five -member City Council -appointed Board, pursuant to Chapter 2 16 of the Municipal Code Commission members server four-year terms, and serve at the pleasure of the City Council On June 30, 2014, former Commission Chairman Doug Wilson resigned his position on the Planning Commission, which would have expired on June 30, 2016, leaving the Commission with a vacancy In addition, the terms of three Commission members are set to expire on June 30, 2014 The three Commission members with expiring terms are eligible to seek reappointment to the Planning Commission, however, Commissioner Bailes has indicated that he would not seek re -appointment The Table below depicts the current composition and terms of the Commission Name Appointed Re -Appointed Term Ends Chairman Tom Comstock 06/27/2002 06/26/2012 06/30/2016 Vice Chair Ryan Stephens* 11/13/2012 -- 06/30/2014 Commissioner Robert Bailes 8/25/2009 07/13/2010 06/30/2014 Commissioner Ohm Kon tan * 2/22/2011 -- 06/30/2014 Vacant -- -- 06/30/2016 *Appointed Mid-term due to vacancy DISCUSSION Packet Pg 106 On March 25, 2014, the City Council directed Staff to advertise for the current vacancy, and the three expiring terms As a result of the advertising, eight (8) applications (attached) were received The applicants are as follows 1 Ryan Stephens (reapplying), 2 Paul Aguilar 3 Jeffrey Allen 4 Robert Best 5 Tara Cesena 6 Edward A Giroux 7 Susan Rucker 8 Mane Vidmar Staff recommends that the Council conduct the interviews and appoint members to the Planning Commission FISCAL IMPACT Planning Commissioners are paid a stipend of $50 00 a month, provided that members attend at least one meeting a month This would continue with the new appointments ATTACHMENTS • 1 Planning Commission Applications_2014 APPROVALS Sandra Molina Completed 06/02/2014 5 42 PM Finance Completed 06/02/2014 5 54 PM City Attorney Completed 06/02/2014 6 14 PM Community Development Completed 06/03/2014 7 48 AM City Manager Completed 06/03/2014 8 33 AM City Council Pending Packet Pg 107 8Aa CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVIC APR 3 0 2014 w Complete and submit to the City C k's Department °' CITY OF GRAND TERRACE E Applying as a r CITY CLERKS �t'ART�JIE _ 0 c. a Name c / O Address ,�C� Q,� �''� N E E Home Phone Business Phone ° i-- ` a) S Occupation Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) a. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yesx) No If so, please list Why are you interested in this appointment? F '.latch% _if'`,/- V—_.ee� ; fi What do you consider to be vour major qualifications? References E 3 3 Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council c E Packet Pg 108 8Aa CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE ReCEIVED Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department MAY d 2 2014 d Applying as a member of Name Addre: Home Phone Occupation E C%���,SS,G�CrrY OF S0C K0TM a c. a 0 N N E Business Phone O c Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) / 6 I A 4:AuG� IL • S ,H SOC,: A"Icko 10q t1 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (4 No If so, please list Why are you interested in this appointment? = y-x,,,� b,,� What do you consider to be your major qualifications? 1.� Vear- Ms ?44 References 1 2 3 Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council 2 9 lie N� UJ _ O a c. a _ 0 N N E 0 L) c m E a Packet Pg 109 8Aa CITY OF GRAND TERRACE R"CEIVED APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERV(C-' APR 2 4 2014 CIT'! OF GRAND TERRACE Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department CiTlo =d.ERK's UEPARTW4ENP Applying as a member -of, C OM Name s b, _ a �� �6,Bo , Address Home Phone IBusiness Phone Occupation V t Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) _'�• a .,,� 4.�*i e,d�vr, -e Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (%,<No If so, please list Why are you interested in this appointment? 1 +0 ra-,^( T2rr'a ae— a b tea, v � � •.'�J � S cz � aw ~� � a �� What do you consider to be your major qualifications? >� ►n del a a �_ �o`� -bt/ V D` l�G V'G 9fJ V`��ta.a+l� e, References AA t- IlQ. )Na e_ -- C ` u CoU F. Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council &Ovev c d E c 0 a c. a C O fA N E E O c a T v n r c O TO M v 0 NI ff! C O .i+ 2 c. a c O N E O t� C C C ca a Packet Pg 110 I F H V � � 1 ✓J` i v, t� S tr 1J(1�I 1 A 1} • r � - q Y M 1 r, A .� LAI �1 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Applications_2014 [Revision 1] (1474 Planning Commission Appointments) co n 8Aa 30 SN8310 A 1.10 QNVUE) dO ,U10 r; ?, ddd !-9:D.98 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE RECEIVED W 4APR 2 S 2014 Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department E Building & Safety Dept r c Applying as a member of f' I anyl l Flu 0 CL Name Cara N-S L no- c 0 AddressT E Home Phone Business Phone ci -reOccupation ie.�1J>�$�" l..d fiU �'~` c Education List highest year completed and all degrees 6A LJ&-..;m/ UY dm 11bl.. ar. a v Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (e7 No If so, please list 0 Why are you interested in this appointment? X .hails`'. W i tyq a be 1 nva ived., in iocial QQyernmed. c 0 What do you consider to be your major qualifications? M kwa— vc ye-d hee- 4 N bul - kYAv&4e.-,e-.,n (=g2qe-x—Ad lbW o longer. T' a 1 io ma-. y& a y i s ua a �� +Iv� mi M c loe ad o� what ave � aae wi F4 WoWd �i' References a 4MPm 2 3.l +i I-Qmaa Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council Packet Pg 112 8Aa CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department Applying as a member of CA4 CIoLny) Dame S i,Sr (J Gf P- Address Home Ph Business Ph N C d E c 0 a a 2 Occupation ( �p _ �y, Q n0 Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) - f CJ IL 16 - OAA C) UA (11,11 D -9 )60 K 2 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet'? ( ) Yes ( No if so, please list W b NI fA C 2 ` cc Why are you interested in this appointment? �/ d 1 Vw U, u ( `2 A i^i A-14 a C 0 pP What d you onsider to be your major qualifications? d n NE o c� tM c c c References w c m E s 2 a 3 Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council Packet Pg 113 (5/29/2014) Debora Thomsen - Stephens - Planning Commission Application pdf CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE CALUDINIA Complete and submit to the City Clerk$ Department Applying as a member of _ Planning Commission Name Ryan Stephen: Address Home Phone Business Phone Occupation Business Owner, Safes Consultant Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) B S Biology - Pacific Union College - 200E M.B.A - University of Redlands- 2010 Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? (X) Yes ( ) No If so, please list Friday evening typicallywould not work for my schedule 0 Why are you interested in this appointment? I have served in this capacity before and have a desire N NN C fn rnnfinne M Senta my rnmmi mfiTin thpjmpnrfant_tack of p1nnning and riPvalpnmant O r What do you consider to be your major qualifications? As a business ownerand active memberot c a the communes I understand the needs of new businesses. the importance of tax revenue for the city. Q c and the desire to preserve the qualities that have made Grand Terrace a wonderful place to live & work w N References E r 1 Marc Wymar - Business Partner C) c 2 Andy McRae- Communif; Pastor Azure HiOs Church c c io 3 Remardo Sandoval - Former City Council Memher d Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council d E io Q Packet Pg 114 8Aa CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE RECEIVED Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department Applying as a member of iR US t-11hx1% N &1 Address C-ew` Home Phone Occupation Business Phone APR 2 3 2014 Commurnty Development Department Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) 1a.57. Klt-ct" c^l= -zLcsj'1Cr. r c O Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (<' No If so, please list N d o: Why are you interested in this appointment?cv; r'vi is Cary =VtF j- Fc w w A RiE,51DLto ' ItL-17j-4--5tilsLtF_ 1c-�G`7 W4 C411u'rtL--0 7h*dLz Ar,3d NCI4, r%. QF-R 041 `_2 t SCtficSCL 11 — r 'TC21 L'lJSut2ts `71-1 ^ S,� 1=Lr t y 0I= -n:tE lffig; �fNi a Coca Purt.LCZ"Q 2E?�s i D 'l sc cam' , S GC! t- 4 Ll u . r 7 i S GThn tvt T .- rc jrr t? k a What do you c resider toi'be you"rmajor q atcificationns �` ''` � ''' o 71�.f��'-f-►L �-t�G.lt.1L�L�tt�]C� l�u-�� Ra1�f�t�lYb'Y t�"SIC,tJ ` `ii�c�r- S1�C1,3-tUbr'� s1� a�j E j L—tJSut'Lt_ Gl^sNt�i'�M1awY11: tt1 hyt SpECJFC Smhj13 rzV)S i &3r:!j j2F:gilr`! pS Ajj 0 a� References 3 ZSCA lh r S G—'u Y« ? t A10 Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council c d E r a Packet Pg 115 8Aa I nd Terrace ,• CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Departme Applying as a member of lklafl�f� Name I Address Home Phone Occupation RECEIVE APR 3 0 2014 c E I:iry OF (3RANI)TERRA01 5 41 ' t ERK'S MPARTMEI 0 a a c 0 N N_ E E 0 U tM c c Ia IL Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) l e Business Phone U6 CJ Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (,r) No If so, please list W+ hny are you interested in1tt_err-)est�ed� in this a/p� pto�illntme�nf, t?1 /��Y�I 5-r nnT�ty,� D i ���/T�y7 t t�//�]M� ��/�� /��� I k)6 vy 1n 1 n-Ar , I V � hIlW f `I.YI I L_1 hi Yi/', 4, 111w7 � ho. OL�� KUh do you consider to be your major qualifications? References e (e, Dam 7e a w c m E v 7+ a Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City Council Jau� 4� I Packet P6 116 This page left intentionally blank AGENDA REPORT June 10, 2014 Council & Successor Agency Item TITLE Selection of Voting Delegate for the California League of Cities 2014 Annual Conference NOTE AMENDED ATTACHMENTS NOW INCLUDED, NOT PRINTED WHEN ORIGINALLY DISTRIBUTED PRESENTED BY RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Debora Thomsen, Interim City Clerk RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution in support of the League of California Cities 2014 Annual Conference, confirm that the representatives, voting delegates, and alternates identified to attend have been chosen by a majority of the City Council and are knowledgeable of the League of California Cities Voting Procedures, and direct staff to submit to the League a Certified copy of the Resolution before August 15, 2014 The City of Grand Terrace is a member of the League of California Cities Annually, the League conducts its Legislative Conference and, for 2014, the scheduled dates and location are September 3 - 5 in Los Angeles, California Each city throughout the state is invited to participate, which includes voting on League policy Each city is allowed one vote The League has requested the City official who will be voting this year be identified DISCUSSION An important part of the Annual Conference is the conducting of the Annual Business Meeting at the General Assembly The Annual Business Meeting is scheduled for noon on Friday, September 5 at the Los Angeles Convention Center For Grand Terrace to be able to vote at the Annual Business meeting, a Voting Delegate must be determined In addition, two alternate voting delegates may be appointed in the absence of the voting delegate (only one of the two will be allowed to vote) Consistent with League bylaws, the city's voting delegate, and up to two alternates, must be designated by the City Council Designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by City Council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the Mayor or City Manager alone In addition, the voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference If the voting delegate cannot attend the complete conference, they may register for Friday only To be able to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the Business Meeting in possession of the voting Packet Pg 117 8B- delegate card and a Voting Delegate sticker In addition, the voting delegate and each alternate must be knowledgeable of the 2014 Annual Conference Voting Procedures The League of California Cities has requested attending cities to submit before August 15, 2014, a Resolution designating the voting delegate and two alternates Adoption of the attached Resolution will satisfy League requirements and enable the City of Grand Terrace to participate in the League's Annual Business Meeting, scheduled for September 5, 2014 FISCAL IMPACT There is no Fiscal Impact associated with the City Council selecting a voting delegate, or alternates to the voting delegate, to the League of Cities ATTACHMENTS • Voting -Delegate -Letter • Reso Appt Delegates andAlternates to League of CA Cities 2014 Conference /_W7ZeI9_T�� Debora Thomsen Completed 06/02/2014 7 44 PM Finance Completed 06/02/2014 10 49 PM City Attorney Completed 06/03/2014 8 58 AM City Manager Completed 06/03/2014 9 22 AM City Council Pending Packet Pg 118 r8Ba L LEAGUE 1400 K Street, Suite 400 •Sacramento, California 95814 Phone 916 658 8200 Fax 916 658 8240 OF CALIFORNIA www cacities org CITIES Council Action Advised by July 31, 2014 May 1, 2014 TO Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 3 - 5, Los Angeles The League's 2014 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 3 - 5 in Los Angeles An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assembly), scheduled for noon on Friday, September 5, at the Los Angeles Convention Center At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Friday, August 15, 2014 This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting • Action by Council Required Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomphshed by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone • Conference Registration Required The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference They need not register for the entire conference, they may register for Friday only To register for the conference, please go to our websrte www cacities or In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the -over- Packet Pg 119 8Ba Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting Transferring Voting Card to Non -Designated Individuals Not Allowed The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official • Seating Protocol during General Assembly At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the Los Angeles z Convention Center, will be open at the following times Wednesday, September 3, 9 00 a in — 5 30 p in , Thursday, September 4, 7 00 a in — 4 00 p in , and Friday, September 5, 7 30-10 00 ,Q a in The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but will be v closed during roll calls and voting co ti eF The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates o Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by Friday, August 15 If you have questions, please call Karen Durham at (916) 658-8262 Attachments 2014 Annual Conference Voting Procedures Voting Delegate/Alternate Form d E a PacketPg 120 8Ba L E AG U E 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone 916 658 8200 Fax 916 658 8240 OF CALIFORNIA www cacities org CITIES Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2014 Annual Conference One City One Vote Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy 2 Designating a City Voting Representative Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates, these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee Registering with the Credentials Committee The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting 4 Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to mrtiate a resolution 5 Vohng To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate 6 Voting Area at Business Meeting At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate 7 Resolving Disputes In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting Packet Pg 121 8 B a O LEAGUE RNIA CITY CITIES 2014 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, August 15, 2014 Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council Please note Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk 1 VOTING DELEGATE Name " M Title 2 VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE 3 VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE 0 Name Name > m Title Title d d PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES as OR c ATTEST I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to w designate the voting delegate and alternate(s) � w Name E-mail E s Mayor or City Clerk Phone C9 (circle one) (signature) Q Date Please complete and return by Friday, August 15, 2014 League of California Cities ATTN Karen Durham 1400 K Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 FAX: (916) 658-8220 E-mail kdurham@cacities org (916) 658-8262 Packet Pg 122 86b RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES TO THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, the League of California Cities ("League") will be having its ci 2014 Annual Conference from September 3, 2014 to September 5, 2014 in Los M Angeles, and WHEREAS, the League's 2014 Annual Conference will have an Annual Business Meeting on September 5, 2014 in which the League's membership may consider and take action on resolutions that establish League policy, and WHEREAS, in order to participate in the Annual Business Meeting and to attend the League's 2014 Annual Conference, the Bylaws of League require the City Council to appoint, by a majority vote, a primary Voting Delegate and up to two Alternate Voting Delegates, one of whom may vote in the Annual Business Meeting in the event that the primary designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to appoint a Voting Delegate and Alternate Voting Delegates to the League of California Cities, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 is hereby appointed to serve as the Voting Delegate to the League of California Cities representing the City of Grand Terrace SECTION 2 is hereby appointed to serve as the Alternate Voting Delegate to the League of California Cities representing the City of Grand Terrace SECTION 3 is hereby appointed to serve as the Alternate Voting Delegate to the League of California Cities representing the City of Grand Terrace SECTION 4 The City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City r Packet Pg 123 8Bb PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this day of June, 2014 /_Ai1*31 Debora Thomsen, Interim City Clerk (seal) Walt Stanckiewitz, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Richard L Adams II, City Attorney I HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of June, 2014, by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAINED Debora Thomsen, Interim City Clerk (seal) Packet Pg 124 1R o 6-p"r-- sDUi-2r T U 6 1 l` c DRAFT 2 WESTWOOD STREET THIS IS A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE NO PARKING SIGNS WERE INSTALLED ON WESTWOOD STREET BUT, NOT ON WESTWOOD LANE WHY NOT? THE SAME RATIONALE FOR NO PARKING ON WESTWOOD STREET SHOULD EXTEND TO WESTWOOD LANE WESTWOOD LANE IS ACTUALLY ONE FOOT NARROWER THAT WESTWOOD STREET I UNDERSTAND THE FUNDAMENTAL REASON WAS TO PROVIDE UNIMPEDED ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AN IMPLICATION A DANGEROUS SITUATION EXISTS QUESTION IS 1 WAS IT FORESEEABLE? 2 DID THE CITY HAVE NOTICE? 3 DID THE CONDITION CAUSE THE DAMAGE? 4 IS IT DANGEROUS? IN ADDITION TO PRECLUDING PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF BOTH STREETS THE REMAINING PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO USE BY RESIDENTS AND LEGITIMATE VISITORS ONLY. BECAUSE PARKING SPACE HAS BEEN REDUCED 50% WHY? A GATE INSTALLED AT PALM AND HONEY HILL DRIVE HAS CAUSED A SURGE OF TRAFFIC ON WESTWOOD STREET BY PEOPLE WANTING TO GO HIKING ON BLUE MOUNTAIN 1 A WHAT ARE THE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF THIS? 1 LEGITIMATE VISITORS CAN BE INCONVENIENCED BY NONRESIDENTS PARKING IN FRONT OF HOMES 2 INCREASED TRAFFIC CAUSES INCREASED ROAD WEAR WESTWOOD STREET WAS NEVER INTENDED TO CARRY A LOT OF TRAFFIC 3 IT IS NOT UNUSUAL TO FIND PEOPLE PARKING NEAR THE END OF WESTWOOD STREET BEFORE 5 00 AM IN THE MORNING 4 SAME AS NO 3 EXCEPT LATE AT NIGHT 5 INCREASED NOISE AND TRASH 6 SOME DOGS BROUGHT INTO THE AREA ARE NOT ON A LEASH 7 THERE WAS A CONFRONTATION WITH ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS AND A DOG OWNER, PLUS ONE OF THE DOGS GROWLED AT HIM NOT A GOOD SITUATION CALIF FOLLOWS THE "NO BITE" RULE 8 A RESULT OF THE INCREASED HUMAN ACTIVITY INCLUDING DOGS, WILDLIFE IN THE ARE HAS BEEN VIRTUALLY DRIVEN AWAY 9 IT WAS NOT UNCOMMON TO SEE RABBITS SKUNKS RACCOON COYOTE BOBCAT (RARE) DEER (RARE) POSSUM QUAIL ROAD RUNNERS WHERE WE HAD SKUNKS WE NOW HAVE DISCARDED CONDOMS, BEER CANS INSTEAD OF RABBITS, TRASH INSTEAD OF COYOTES, AND BROKEN SPRINKLER HEADS INSTEAD OF POSSUM 2 r 10 ACCORDING TO THE SHERIFF'S GT OFFICER THOSE PEOPLE GOING OUT INTO THE OPEN FIELDS ARE ACTUALLY TRESPASSING PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY WOULD MAKE THE NEIGHBORHOOD SAFER REDUCE NOISE AND TRAFFIC ELIMINATE TRASH PEOPLE LEAVE ELIMINATE DAMAGE TO RESIDENTS WATERING SYSTEMS REDUCE WEAR AND TEAR ON WESTWOOD STREET ELIMINATE POTENTIAL FOR DOG BITES BENEFIT THE OPEN FIELDS OWNER BY REDUCING INSURANCE RISK REDUCE POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD THERE IS TALK OF PAINTING THE CURB ON WESTWOOD LANE RED ---- WHY NOT WESTWOOD STREET 6/10/2014 �S n Child Care Proposed Rates for FY2014-15 June 10, 2014 6/10/2014 -to 6/10/2014 n _Child Care Proposed .�� Rates for FY2014-15 �{k June 10, 2014 I)uesti c , ' -'f A y��7 .6� ��.'s��+ye °a* . � ?� � y� F, � �a � 3(t�'t� ��� „a •�� .. ��: � .'� �'s �'"`,� „�a � �, r .� � �� +a � �.� � �r� 4� ; , �" � a �.����� a� �p '"a� � ',sa', r i ��. �,�, •� ryc�g�#t si , �,. '� .e•.� t � ' ,.'� { '"� sEB� ,�'a `'' , � "� � �i '� } Fi `# .. .5 ..ti . �+.==it'd �� `` � � •ass „��, e` �3. * Fgr>K "� �F{Sj ` °a � �.` �t � ,�,' � ��• r � .� a �� $ '�, �'4 � 6/10/2014 It I_NeV..'0i Assumptions p At Revenue Assumptions ,,' µ s. ° rt S'�'" `. , " .. n' _ °oC�G �"x" `^ %'. - . t'' ,'_!�'r•,�,' ..;?.4 ", AI[C .? ~ .r.,. . µ ,, a'r,. firs':; � —t#"�` -a" �: =x• • General Furid-prop..erty taxes are frozen; RPTTF residual increased by 311/6 annually. • Licenses, Fees and"Permitsf are projected a to increase by $50,000; • Annual increase of revenues at 3% for the other revenues; 4 6/10/2014 Revenue Assumptions: • Additional RPTTF receipts as provided by RSG property tax consultants based on their initial projection and percentage of the City's last distribution allocation; • Assumes overpayment by the County of RPTTF totaling $360,000; 5 Revenue Assumptions: • Reduction in RPTTF receipts as a result of the $360,000 overpayment made by the County as follows: • FY2014-15 reduction - ($2009000) • FY2015-16 reduction - Total Reduction s 3 NL 6/10/2014 -Summary 77'�� 7 77 t, 17V • It should be noted that these are projections only, the development of which has not been coordinated with the Auditor - Controller's Office (San Bernardino),. • Based, however, on the significant amount ,of additional, RPTTF funds the City's property tax consultant is projecting 'staff thought it prudent to provide Council with this additional information. 15 Questions? �} r z 16 1 6/10/2014 lu x �rc�u er k u Ee�,a'rTr-V��e`C° 're «5. �r _ 5-Y REVENUES Property Tax Residual Receipts RPTTF Additional RPTTF per RSG estimate Possible O✓erpymt reduction from RPTTF Franchise Fees Licenses Fees & Permits Sales Tax Intergovernmental Revenue/Grants Charges for Services Fines & Forfeitures Miscellaneous Use of Money & Property Waste Water Lease Agreement it Projection City of Grand Terrace General Fund Five Year Projection 201415 201516 201617 201718 201819 Projected Protected Projected Protected Protected 1 414 600 1 414 000 1 414 000 1 414 000 1 414 000 306 370 315 600 $25100 334 900 344 900 200 000 274 400 302 900 338 100 380100 (200 000) (1 so 000) 480 000 494 400 509 200 524 500 540 200 276 200 326 200 376 200 426 200 476 200 1 047 000 1 078 400 1 110 800 1 144100 1 178 400 35 000 36100 37 200 38 300 39 400 81 200 83 600 86100 88 700 91 400 25 000 25 800 26 600 27 400 28 200 5 000 5200 5 400 5 600 5 B00 25 000 25 800 26 600 27 400 28 200 700,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 4,394770 4,219,500 4,620,100 4669,200 4,826,800 12 J