1994-18 i
r_ RESOLUTION NO. 94-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TPM-94-01, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14685)
AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (E-94-08)
WHEREAS,the Applicant,Richard K.Churchwell,has applied for approval of TTM-
94-01, a Tentative Parcel Map 14685, subdividing 4.9± into three lots (Parcels 1, 2 and 3)
to be located at 23081 Grand Terrace Road (APN 276-411-01); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article
6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachment B) and said Negative
Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the
California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on June 2, 1994, regarding this application; and
,- WHEREAS, on June 2, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended approval to
the City Council of TTM-94-01 and its associated Negative Declaration (E-94-08) subject
to the conditions contained herein; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June
23, 1994, regarding this application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace, California, that the following findings are made in relation to TPM-94-01 and E-94-
08;
1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development;
2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;
3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not
likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and
property from a wildland conflagration;
5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and
improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the
conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code,
and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace;
7. That the proposed project has considered the potential use of passive and
natural energy saving devices in its design;
8. That the proposed subdivision is within the goals of the City's Housing
Element with regards to housing availability.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Grand Terrace,California,that TPM-94-01 and the aforementioned Negative Declaration
(Attachment B) are hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The remainder parcel shall be subject to independent review for a tentative
map with its separate set of conditions.
2. This map supersedes any previous Tentative Tract/Parcel Maps on this
property.
3. The subject property shall be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and
Landscaping District.
4. The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the California Aqueduct,
Riverside Highland Water, East Riverside Irrigation District easements, if
applicable.
5. All conditions and recommendation of covenant for future improvements as
recommended by the City Engineer's Department in their recommendations
dated May 25, 1994 (Attachment Q.
6. All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department
(Attachment D).
7. Prior to issuance of building permits, payment of applicable Colton Unified
School District fees.
8. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside Highland Water Company
in their memorandum dated May 25, 1994 (Attachment E).
9. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside-Corona Resource
Conservation District in their memorandum dated September 25, 1993
(Attachment F).
10. As to the remaining mature and healthy trees within the project, they should
be preserved where feasible consistent with the necessary grading
requirements.
11. Consideration of alternative street lighting, with a focus toward rural
atmosphere lighting, to be approved by the Community Development
Director.
12. At time of Fee Schedule adoption, applicant shall pay applicable traffic
impact fee in proportion to amount of trips generated by the development.
13. Each individual lot shall be provided an individual curbside mailbox.
14. Prior to.development, on Parcels 1 and 3, submittal for Site and Architectural
Review shall be required.
15. Prior to, map finalization, building pads on Parcels 1 and 3 shall reflect
appropriate sideyard setbacks.
16. Agreement shall be made between subject property owner and property owner
to the south to provide mutual easement for temporary turn around within
100' right-of-way of the California Aqueduct.
17. Thirty(30) feet of right-of-way from Arliss Drive to Grand Terrace Road shall
be dedicated to the City to be vacated when there is an alternative plan to
provide access to the remaining parcels.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a regular meeting held the 23rd day of June, 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City May of the City of
Grand Terrace and of the Gr d Terrace and of the
City Council-thereof: City Council thereof.
I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1994, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Hilkey and singlet'; Mayor Matteson
NOES Councilmember Buchanan
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Carlstrom
ABSTAIN:None
City Clerk - =
APPROVED AS TO FORM
John Harper,
City Attorney
CITY
o Planning
tiny TER R c Department
NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
An application for a Tentative Parcel Map 14685, TPM-94-01 and Environmental Review
E-94-08, to subdivide 4.9 acres into three parcels. This property is located in the City's R1-
10 Zone District and within the General Plan's Very Low Density Residential landuse
designation. Parcel #2 contains an existing single family residence; the balance of the
property is undeveloped. This application will supersede and nullify Tentative Tract Map
14483, TTM-89-04, approved on March 28, 1991.
APPLICANT:
Richard K Churchwell (Property Owner)
Sitetech, Inc. - Bernie Mayer (Engineer)
LOCATION:
23081 Grand Terrace Road (APN 276-411-01)
Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review
at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace
(909-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to June 20,
1994. All comments should be directed to Joann Lombardo, Interim Community
Development Director.
1-4
Joann Lombardo Date
Interim Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road 0 Grand Terrace,California 92324-5295•(909) 824-6621 13
a Planning
nD TER R c Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
An application for a Tentative Parcel Map 14685, TPM-94-01 and Environmental Review
E-94-08, to subdivide 4.9 acres into three parcels. This property is located in the City's R1-
10 Zone District and within the General Plan's Very Low Density Residential landuse
designation. Parcel 42 contains an existing single family residence; the balance of the
property is undeveloped. This application will supersede and nullify Tentative Tract Map
14483, TTM-89-04, approved on March 28, 1991.
APPLICANT:
Richard K. Churchwell (Property Owner)
Sitetech, Inc. - Bernie Mayer (Engineer)
LOCATION:
23081 Grand Terrace Road (APN 216-411-01)
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
Joann Lombardo Date
Interim Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road• Grand Terrace,California 92324-5295•(909)824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attention: Patrizia Materassi, PlanningDirector, 714-824-6621
3. Date of Environmental Assessment: __J�A V l l q 9
4. Agency Requiring Assessment: City of Grand Terrace
-ey,-rATIV2, f ARCM MAC
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: :r�i�l
6. Location of Proposal: -23O8 / C PA ND TGR R ACE RnA>
-RAND 1ERrzAc CA
H. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.)
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or
in changes in geologic /
substructures? �/
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering /
of this soil? \/
C. Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
-_ 1
Yes Ma3Lbe No
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique /
_ geologic or physical features? V
e. Any substantial increase in wind
or water erosion of soils, /
either on or off site? V
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
situation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or /
similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient /
air quality? V
b. The creation,of objectionable /
odors?
C. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether /
locally or regionally? y
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial changes in currents,
or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine /
or fresh waters? V
2
Yes Maybe No
b. Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the /
rate and amount of surface J
runoff?
C. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface /
water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited-
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen /
or turbidity? V
f. Alteration of the direction or /
rate of flow of ground waters? V
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer
cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available for public water /
supplies? V/
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops and aquatic plants)?
3
. _
b. Reduction of the numbers of any Yes Ma•� No
unique, rare or endangered /
species of plants? VJ
C. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing /
species? 'V
d. Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or /
insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered /
species of animals? V
C. Deterioration to existing fish /
or wildlife habitat? V
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe /
noise levels? V
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal /
produce substantial new light or glare? V
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area? V
4
Yes Maybe No
- 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial increase in the rate /
of use of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any /
nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or /
upset conditions? V
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an /
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter
-� the location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population /
of an area? V
.12. Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for /
additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial /
additional vehicular movement?
b. . Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new ,✓
parking?
C. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
5
Yes Maybe No
d. Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail
or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal
have substantial effect upon, or result
in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas: /
a. Fire protection? V
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? A/
e. Maintenance of public facilities, /
including roads? V
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts /
of fuel or energy? V/
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new /
sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
6
Yes Maybe No
_ a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems? V/
C. Water? V
d. Sewer or septic tanks? V
e. Storm water drainage? y
f. Solid waste and disposal? v
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)? 'V
b. Exposure of people to potential
hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to /
public view? V
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities? V
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic /
archaeological site?
7
Yes Maybe No
f " b. Will the proposal result in
-- adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
or object?
C. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values? t/
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred uses /
within the potential impact areaT
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the.project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California /
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will /
endure well into the future.)
C. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project's impact on two or
8
Yes Maybe No
more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is /
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
Environmental Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a.NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Patrizia Materassi
Planning Director
. -' 7- _
Date Signature
For City of Grand Terrace
9
III. DISCUSSION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
PROTECT NAME: Tentative Parcel Map 14685
PROTECT APPLICANT: Richard K. Churchwell (Property Owner)
Sitetech, Inc. - Bernie Mayer (Engineer)
PROTECT DESCRIPTION: An application for Tentative Parcel Map 14685, TPM-
94-01 and Environmental Review E-94-08, to subdivide
4.9 acres into three parcels. This property is located in
the City's R-10 zone District and within the General
Plan's Very Low Density Residential landuse
designation. Parcel#2 contains an existing single family
residence; the balance of the property is undeveloped.
This application will supersede and nullify Tentative
Tract Map 14483, TTM-89-04, approved on March 28,
1991.
PROTECT LOCATION: 23081 Grand Terrace Road,
Grand Terrace
(APN 276-411-01)
1 a, b Earth. Will proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions, disruptions, displacements, compactions of soil,
change in topography or destruction to physical features?
La - Maybe.
Lb Yes.
The project may result in changes to the soil and physical features. However,
this is mitigated through the Planning and Building review process by the City
Engineer's requirement for a formal grading plan,preliminary soils report for
the proposed construction area, and proof of adequate drainage facilities as
part of the conditions of approval for the project prior to occupancy in the
future.
1. c, d, e, f and g
Earth. Will proposal result in:
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, changes to river or stream, or
expose people or property to geological hazards?
No, there will be no substantial change to topography or ground surface relief
features or increase in wind or water erosion of soils, or exposure of people
or property to geological hazards as the City Engineer will condition to
control proper drainage and adequate grading. The project has been
conditioned to this effect.
2. a, b, c Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or deterioration of .air quality, creation of
objectionable odors or alteration of air movement or change in climate?
No, the proposed project will not result in substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality as there will be no active construction as
of yet. Any grading will be controlled in accordance with the City Engineer's
requirements. This project is conditioned to this effect.
3. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or the course of water movements, change
in absorption or drainage patterns, change in surface water, discharge into
surface waters,alteration of rate of flow of ground waters,reduction in public
water supplies or exposure of water related hazards to the public?
No, the proposed project will not significantly alter any water movements nor
expose the public to water related hazards or reduce water supplies. The City
Engineer is requiring adequate drainage facilities and formal grading as part
of the conditions for approval. This project has been conditioned to this
effect.
4. a Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity or reduction of species, or introduce new species of
plants?
No, the existing site is partially developed with landscaping and irrigation on
one lot. Two other lots are vacant. The project is conditioned to submit
formal landscaping and irrigation plans for building permit processing after
review by the Site and Architectural Review Board. This project has been
conditioned to this effect.
4. b, c, d No, the proposal will not result in reduction of the number of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants or introduction of new species of plants
into an area of native vegetation or barrier to the normal replenishment of
t existing species.
5. a, b, c Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of animal species or reduction of numbers or
rare/endangered species or deterioration to wildlife habitat?
No,the site does not contain any endangered animal species or unique animal
habitats.
6. a, b Noise. Will the proposal result in:
Increases in existing noise levels or expose people to severe noise levels?
a. Maybe. The proposed project may add some increase in noise levels or
expose people to moderate noise levels as a result of the development of
residential uses on the two lots that are vacant ' during grading and
construction stages. This impact will be within the allowable levels, pending
the Master Environmental Analysis of the General Plan.
b. No. The.project has been conditioned that the applicant must meet the
maximum 55 dba noise level adjacent to residential properties. This is
monitored by the City Noise Ordinance and Planning/Building and Safety.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare?
No, the proposal will not produce new lighting at this stage, only during time
of actual construction. This item will be addressed during Site and
Architectural Review of single family residential development.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present
or planned land use of an area?
No, the proposed use is an acceptable use within the Low Density Residential
Area, R1-10 Zone.
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial increase in the use of natural resources or depletion of same?
No, the.proposed use will not alter or substantially increase the use of natural
resources or deplete the resources as this project does not require additional
usage.of natural resources more than what already exists.
10. Risk. of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of
an accident or upset conditions?
No, the proposed project will not involve the risk of exposure to hazardous
substances as the project is only vacant land.
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population of an area?
No, the proposed project will have no impact on the location, distribution,
density and growth rate of the human population as it will not substantially
affect population density of the area. Upon development, the project will
consist of three single family homes and is consistent with the General Plan.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
No, the proposed project will have no impact upon the existing housing and
shall not result in creating a demand for additional housing as it does not
involve growth factors, density and similar issues. Upon development, the
project will consist of three single family homes and is consistent with the
General Plan.
13. a, b, d Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in
Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing
parking facilities or demand for new parking? Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
No. The project will eventually become a residential development, thus
creating an increased vehicular movement to the existing traffic circulation
pattern. The CMP thresholds for TIA's are 250 dwelling units. The project
will not generate enough vehicle trips to require a TIA nor exceed any of the
Grand Terrace residential thresholds of 100 dwelling units. However, this
project will be required to pay a traffic mitigation fee per trip added to the
traffic system. This project has been conditioned to this effect, that upon
adoption of the fee schedules, the applicant will be required to pay the traffic
impact fee.
13. c, e, f Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to
waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
No, there will be no substantial impact upon existing transportation systems
or alterations to air, rail or waterborne traffic.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have a substantial effect upon, or result
in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following
areas:
Fire Protection?
No, it is not anticipated that increase of fire protection services would result
from the proposed project. The project has been conditioned in compliance
with the Fire Warden's requirements.
Police Protection?
No, the proposed project will have no effect upon or result in the need for
new or altered police protection services as the type of project proposed does
not require it.
Schools?
No, the proposed project will not have substantial effect upon, or result in a
need in new or altered governmental services as the type of project proposed
does not require it.
Parks or other recreational facilities?
No, the proposed project will not have substantial effect upon or result in a
need for new or altered parks or recreation facilities as the type of project
does not require it.
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
No, the project is conditioned to have the applicant responsible for paying
Capital Impact Fee to help pay for street improvements as needed.
Other governmental services?
No, there are no impacts to other governmental agencies anticipated as a
result of the proposed project.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
No, the proposed project will not result in the use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy as there will be no major physical improvements to the specific
site area.
Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
No, the proposed project will not result in the substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources
of energy as it shall operate within the building facility's existing levels of
energy.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? Sewer or septic
tanks, storm water drainage, solid waste and disposal?
No, there will be no need for new systems or substantial alterations to the
utilities by the proposed project as there is sufficient water availability.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of
people to potential hazards?
No, the project does not require any collection of significant hazardous waste
or exposure of people to potential hazards as this project does not require any
handling of such materials.
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or
view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
- No, there will be no obstruction of any scenic view open to the public as the
project is currently proposed.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
No, the proposed project will not create any impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities.
20. a, b Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric or .historical archaeological site? Will the
proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
No, there will be no significant archaeological, prehistoric or historic
destruction or adverse physical/aesthetic effects as there are not prehistoric
or historic buildings or objects on the site.
21. c, d Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique, ethnic cultural values or restrict existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact area?
No, there are no unique ethnic cultural values anticipated to be affected nor
any known religious or sacred uses to be impacted as this proposed use does
not contain any such uses.
21. a, b, c, d
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of
-California history or pre-history?
No, the proposed project will not impact the environment or reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species or eliminate major periods of California
history or pre-history as this is not an expansion of physical development, and
there are no fish or game existing on the site.
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
No,the proposed project,with its implementation of individual environmental
programs from local, State and Federal regulatory agencies will achieve short-
term as well as long-term goals without significantly impacting the
environment.
C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable?
No, cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project can be in
relation to the additional traffic flow however, are conditioned by traffic
mitigation measures as the traffic impact fee to be paid by the applicant.
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
No, it is not anticipated that the proposed project will create adverse effects
on human beings since the project is regulated under safely controlled
conditions in accordance with County, State and Federal environmental and
public health guidelines.
12-2.1080
C�RfiHi)TERR C
MEMORANDUM
22795 Barton Road TO: Joann.Lombardo, Interim Community Development Director
Grand Terrace
California 92324-5295 FROM: Joseph Kicak, City Enginee
,12/
Civic Center
(909)824-6621 DATE: May 24, 1994
Fax(909)783-7629
SUBJECT: T.P.M. 14685 (TPM-94-01/E-94-08)
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for the subject
Parcel Map:
Byron R.Matteson I. Barton Road
Mavor
,nald M.Christianson - (a) Construct-th&balance of-MO and-gcttter;curb-return-and-cross gutter--
Mayor Pro Tempore at the intersection of Grand Terrace Road and Barton Road.
Gene Carlstrom 2. Grand Terrace Road
Herman Hilkey
Jim Singley
Council Members (a) Dedicate to provide for 30 foot half street.
Thomas I Schwab (b) Construct standard curb and gutter 18 feet from street-centerline.
City Manager.
(c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline.
3. Both streets shall be designed to TI=6 for structural section.
4. Install standard sidewalk.
5. Install ornamental street lights.
6. Determine the location of existing sewer lateral serving proposed Lot 2. If
said lateral is outside the property lines of proposed Lot"2, it shall be relocated
to within said property lines.
7. Provide adequate drainage facilities.
8. Provide sanitary sewer laterals to parcels 1 and 3.
C -�
Joann Lombardo
May 24, 1994 -
Page 2
9. Pay all capital improvement fund fees(at Building Permit stage).
10. Obtain will serve letter from Riverside Highland Water Company.
11. Remove any structures encroaching from Parcel 2 into "Remainder Parcel".
12. Submit grading plan and comply with the requirements of the preliminary soils report.
13. Any encroachment with respect to grading on adjacent parcels will require a letter
from the adjacent property owners to permit such encroachment.
14. Proposed TPM 14685 shall be annexed to the existing 89-1 Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District pursuant to the applicable provisions of 1972 Act.
15. All improvementsshall be.designed by owner's.Civil-Engineer ta:the specifications-of,
the City.
Note: It is our recommendation that an agreement be signed and recorded as covenant running with
the land for-all the above conditions except Condition No. 2 (a), 6 and 10. The balance of the -
conditions will apply at grading.permit stage, or at such other time as the City may deem_ the
compliance with these conditions in the best interest of the City.
JK/ct
FORESTRY AND FIRE t' 1RDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
385 No.Arrowhead Avenue,First Floor San Bernardino,CA 92415-0186 DICK WILLIAMS, Director
(714) 387-4212, 387-4213 S
sum. a M�[ru�1�i3r
FIRE WARDEN
EMERGENCY SERVICES
SHERIFF
Serving the comnuntties of:
Angelus Oaks
Barter
GRAND TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Baldy Miesa
Big River
Black f•ieadow Lancing
Boron Federal Y Pr•sn n
�� / Z ( i',
CDF) Chino ' ;
Date• City of Grand i en;to
P
A " D City of Needls
To: ��% � Copper T,4ounrr.in ;•Sesa
Daggett Airpon
N 21994 DelvOle
Fire Department Reference Number:7 Lll ElD9ir~==
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FIRE WARDEN riar;and
Applicant: CL 6'5Z
(t:DF) Hasper:a
r C:1y:,f H3ghlan
Location: 23 / 1agTes:aid
G Joshua'rr�
iC:1 ) Loma
THE FOLLOWING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR`7)e
RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: �`'"
?`ie^:1Gi;e
�.�,•�-• cu
A site inspection final, is required to verify conditions of approval' Acres
have been met. Morongo vzl;e'
Alt. B?!dv
Oak Glen
R F-1. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to0akHi:ls
grading and snow removal, shall be provided. Written documentationikmo?');
shall be. submitted to the fire- department having jurisdiction. PriVate•ker Darn
fire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with a minimum Phelan
paving width of twenty (20) feet. PioneenGur.
Red !Ao-.;n ain
San Antonin
R F-2. ater systems designed to meet the required fire flow of,,this -
dev ent shall be approved ' by the f ire department hav
jurisdiction. The developer shall furnish the fire department with.tw.o :-:
�es! l eon '.�.ev
copies of the water system improvement plan for approval. Water systems, ,
icam
shall be operational and approved by the fire department prior to 'a""
framing construction occurring. The required fire flow shall
determined by the appropriate calculations, using the San .Bernardino
County 'Guide For the Determination of Fire Flow." Water systems shall
• have minimum eight (8) inch mains, six ( 6`) inch risers. pp
Required fire flow is Z-�do ��� '"� . Tested at fQ 0
r,r;,;•, . .... .iD:;D r::ivr.t� Sec.,.. -' il�C/'®-tJ•�Jltl � •�..�V�� '(�
APPROVED
Fire Dept Ref. No.
Page Two
SAN BERNARDINO
" COUNTY FIRE WARDEN
R F-2A. In areas without water serving utilities, the fire
protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational
prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons
with gravity f low or an approved NFPA 13, 13R, or 13D f ire sprinkler
system. See attached private water supply requirements.
R F-2B. MS-IL3' THROUGH IL5. Water systems designed to meet the
required fire flow shall be operational and approved by the fire
department prior "to framing construction occurring. The required fire
flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San
Bernardino County "Guide For the Determination of Required Fire Flow,"
In areas without water serving utilities, the fire protection water
system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing.
All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow
or an approved NFPA 13, 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler system.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
BEING ISSUED:
Bp F3 The San Bernardino County Forestry and .Fire Warden
Departmen provides fire protection for the City of Grand Terrace. Prior
to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact
the fire department for verification of current fire protection
development requirements. All new construction shall comply with the
existing Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes,
codes, ordinances, or standards of the fire department.
BP F4. This development shall comply with Fire Safety Overlay
conditions as adopted by County Development Code. This development is
located in Fire Review Area
Bp F5 Prior to any. framing construction occurring, all flammable
veget n shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance
of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a
finished structure.
i
i
i
s
3
APPRUVED
r� �I 94
Page Three Fire Dept. Ref. o.
SAN SERNARDINO
COUNTY FIRE WARDEN
BP 'F6. A minimum fuel modification zone is required to
comply with county standards.
BP 7 . Prior to framing construction, approve
d . fire hydrants and
fire h rant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall
be six (6) inch in diameter with a minimum of one four ( 4) inch and one
two and a half (2 1/2) inch connection as specified by the fire
department. The design of the fire hydrant and fire hydrant pavement
marker shall be approved by the fire department.
All fire hydrant spacing shall be three hundred (300) feet with the
exception of single family residential which may be increased to six
hundred (600) feet maximum.
In areas where snow removal occurs or non-paved roads exist the blue
reflective,hydrant marker shall be posted on an approved post three feet
from the hydrant.
BP F8. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each
roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac
length shall not exceed six hundred (600.) feet, except as identified in
the development code and approved by the fire chief.
( ) See attached diagram of approved turnarounds.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
O F9. Prior- to final inspection, commercial or industrial buildings
shall post street address with a minimum of eight (8) inch numbers.
Street addresses shall be visible from the street and during the hours
of darkness they .shall be automatically illuminated.
Where building setbacks exceed one hundred (100) feet from roadway
additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be
displayed at property access entrance.
..i
JUN 21994 i!
Page Four Fire Dept. Ref. N .
cs F IN0
COUNTY FIRE WARDEN
l
O F-10. Every chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any
heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be
maintained with an approved.spark arrester. It shall be constructed of
stainless steel, copper or brass, woven galvanized wire mesh, twelve
(12) gauge minimum of three-eighths (3/8) inch minimum to one-half (1/2)
inch maximum openings, as per County Code 3381. The mesh shall be
visible from the ground. No decorator caps allowed.
O F-11. The development and each phase thereof shall have
two (2) points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency
equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations
as required by the development code.
O F-12. Private roadways which exceed one hundred and
fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the fire department
having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one hundred fifty
(150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall
be provided within fifty ( 50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade
between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty (30)
percent. Where the access road cannot be provided, a fire protection
system shall be provided as required and approved by the fire
department.
O F13. An approved fire department lock is required on all gates.
Any atic electric security gates used, require an approved lock
switch. Contact this office for lock applications.
O F14. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform
Fire Code Standard #10-1.
O F15 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of
suf t information to review. Please submit building plans and
declaration of use for proper application of codes.
•Page _ Fire _Dept. Ref. No. �'�
SPECIAL NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1.
3.
4.
Questions and comments may be directed to:
Fire Protection Planning _
County Goverment Center, First Floor
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92415-0186.
Phone (909) 387-4213.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief
County Fire Warden
BY:
Steve Faris, Captain
Fire Protection Planning Officer
FEES
• �z Type
Date Pd_
(forms/comm 3/93) Amount /dD-�
�5 pIAN�
1450 Washington Street • Colton, California 92324 • (909) 825-4128
Ole P�NSFRV^t O
May 25, 1994
Ms. Joann Lombardo
` Interim Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Re: File No. TPM-94-01/E-94-08
Dear Ms. Lombardo;
Riverside I-ighland Water Company..can_serve.water to Parcel#1 and Parcel#3 of Parcel Map_ ------- -
No. I4685 as we are currently serving Parcel#2-from-GraudTerrace'Road: - _ =
Unfortunately, due to the configuration of the water mains,we can not serve water to any of the
"remaining parcel" on Parcel Map No. 14685. To serve the remaining parcel, a new and recon-
figured water main system would need to be designed and installed.
There may be additional requirements for serving water after reviewing the San Bernardino_
County Fire Marshall's conditions.
Sincerely,
z-
.15ugene
P. McMeans
General Manager
EPM/ss
cc: Rich Haubert
Development File
IM MAY 2 1994
E __
o -
Spy River. side-COrc3na .
Resource Conservation District
r
_U
y 2023CHICAGOAVENUE,B14 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92507 PHONE(714)683-7691
0
o�
�C�NSEM Pt�
r'
September 25, 1990 TPM—q'4 -O 1
Dear City of Grand Terrace,
We acknowledge receipt of the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for
'I'P11�S911 809 no - S=uo-_a-a Coo ny C a?ifornU"was addressed to
—V"*,�..i JJ ..J--t�l vua��vwu�f. V
USDA,Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation
District on September 25, 1990 for review and comment.
We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report and find that:
1. There are no controversial items in-the-report within the realm of the Soil-
Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities.
a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or
flooding within the project area.
b. There is no Prime,State,Unique or Locally Important Farmland involved
in the project area.
c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or
projects.
20 We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by your committee:
In review of the above application,.we recommend an erosion control plan be
included in overall plan to address wind and water erosion both during and after
construction.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project
Sincerely,
`I
STANLEY COOLEY
Vice-President