05/22/2012CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA • MAY 22, 2012
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center • 22795 Barton Road
City of Grand Terrace Page 1 Updated 5/10/2012 12:07 PM
The City of Grand Terrace complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you require
special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at (909) 824-6621 at
least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
If you desire to address the City Council during the meeting, please complete a request to speak form
available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Speakers will be called upon by the Mayor at
the appropriate time.
Any documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made
available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at city hall located at 22795 Barton Road during
normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at
www.cityofgrandterrace.org
BUDGET WORKSHOP AT 4:00 P.M.
Convene the City Council Budget Workshop
1.Roll Call
2.Public Comment
3.Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2012-13
Adjourn Budget Workshop
CALL TO ORDER -REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 P.M.
Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency
Invocation -Pastor Andy McRae, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz ¨¨¨
Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia ¨¨¨
Councilwoman Darcy McNaboe ¨¨¨
Councilman Bernardo Sandoval ¨¨¨
Councilman Gene Hays ¨¨¨
Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 22, 2012
City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Updated 5/10/2012 12:07 PM
1.ITEMS TO DELETE
2.SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A.Riverside Highland Water Company -Poster Contest Winners, Grand Terrace Elementary School
B.State of California 63rd Assemly District Woman of Distinction Recognition
C.Grand Terrace Area Chamber of Commerce Business of the Month (April & May)
3.CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be
acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen
may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
A.Waive Full Reading of Full Ordinances on Agenda
B.Approval of Minutes –Regular Meeting –05/08/2012
C.Check Register No. 05-22-2012
D.Accept Crime Prevention Committee Minutes of April 9, 2012
E.Accept Historical and Cultural Activities Committee Minutes of April 2, 2012
F.Accept Emergency Operations Committee Minutes of December 6, 2011, January 3, 2012, March 6, 2012
and April 3, 2012
4.PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular
agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on
any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for
clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public
comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting.
5.COUNCIL REPORTS
6.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zoning Change 12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A.Conceptual Design for Veteran's Memorial "Wall of Freedom" at Pico Park
8.NEW BUSINESS
A.Emergency Operations Committee Appointment -La Matry
B.California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Annual Board of Directors Meeting -Designated Board of
Directors Certification
Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 22, 2012
City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Updated 5/10/2012 12:07 PM
9.CLOSED SESSION
A.Employee Negotiations -Labor Negotiations Per Government Code 54957.6 -City Labor Negotiator -
Betsy Adams, City Manager -Negotiated with -All Unrepresented Employees
B.Public Employee Performance Evaluation Per Governent Code Section 54957 (B) Title: City Manager
ADJOURN
The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at 6:00 PM.
10.PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Convene Public Financing Authority
1.Roll Call
2.Public Comment
Adjourn
The next Public Financing Authority Meeting is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 6:00
P.M.
Agenda item requests must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk’s office no later than 14 calendar
days preceding the meeting.
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council & Successor Agency Item
TITLE:Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2012-13
PRESENTED BY:Betsy Adams, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:Receive information on the preliminary budget for Fiscal
Year 2012-13. Provide direction on whether any policy
issues identified in the preliminary budget should be
modified when the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2012-13
is presented at the June 12 Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND:
On April 12, 2011, in response to the Governor's proposed elimination of redevelopment
agencies, the City Council approved an agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
(RSG) to prepare a General Fund Fiscal Sustainability Model which was presented at
the Council Meeting on May 24, 2011 . The model provided a variety of information
including that the General Fund faced a $550,000 revenue shortfall in Fiscal Year (FY)
2011-12 which increased to more than $1 million if redevelopment were lost. On June
28, 2011, in adopting the FY 2011-12 budget, the Council approved six (6) significant
budget reductions that provided $415,288 in on-going savings for the General Fund,
addressing 75% of the General Fund revenue shortfall. These reductions included
removing the Traffic Deputy from the contract for law enforcement services; ending the
Crossing Guard and Community Events programs; and defunding three (3) full-time
positions (Deputy City Clerk, Maintenance Worker 3, and Management Analyst) and five
(5) part-time positions (Code Enforcement Clerk, Code Enforcement Officer, 2 Crossing
Guards, and Parks & Fields Assistant). The City Hall workforce was reduced by 33% in
a single year. No reductions were made to Child Care staffing in the FY 2011-12
budget.
There are three other significant actions the Council took to improve the fiscal condition
of the General Fund in FY 2011-12. The first, on June 14, 2011, was to approve the
sale of the City's cellular telephone tower leases resulting in one-time General Fund
revenue of $365,897. The second, on December 13, 2011, was to approve a contract
landscape maintenance agreement which outsourced park maintenance and allowed
the City to defund a vacant Maintenance Worker 2 position. The third, on March 13,
2012, was to approve the Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services
Contract which reduced the Detective to 20 hours/week and removed the Sheriff's
Service Specialist providing $52,731 in General Fund budget savings for the balance of
the fiscal year and $210,924 in FY 2012-13. This Council action was in response to the
California Supreme Court's ruling in the California Redevelopment Association v.
Matosantos case on December 29, 2011 which dissolved redevelopment agencies as of
February 1, 2012.
3
Packet Pg. 4
DISCUSSION:
The City’s budget situation is especially dynamic with the dissolution of the former
redevelopment agency and the uncertain status of some of the Successor Agency’s
enforceable obligations. For the Budget Workshop on May 22, the budget is being
presented in a preliminary format. The formal proposed budget will be presented at the
Council Meeting on June 12, with the hope that by then more will be known about the
status of the Successor Agency’s enforceable obligations.
The focus of discussion for the preliminary budget will be in two areas --the General
Fund and Successor Agency impacts along with the Child Care Fund. Prior to
beginning discussion in these areas, the City's overall budget will be reviewed. The
table below is a summary of all City funds.
FY 2012-13 Fund Summary
Fund Description Beginning
Fund Balance
Revenues Expenditures Ending Fund
Balance
10 -GENERAL FUND 656,264 3,539,486 -3,378,092 817,658
09 -CHILD CARE 0 966,397 -1,052,347 -85,950
11 -STREET FUND 993,540 7,000 -366,284 634,256
12 -STORM DRAIN FUND 67,252 350 0 67,602
13 -PARK FUND 225,676 7,100 -17,385 215,391
14 -SLESF (AB3229 COPS)0 100,000 -100,000 0
15 -AIR QUALITY IMPRV. FUND 68,460 14,250 0 82,710
16 -GAS TAX FUND 78,669 425,265 -383,280 120,654
17 -TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND (9,826)71,500 -53,640 8,034
19 -FACILITIES FUND 208,304 200 0 208,504
20 -MEASURE "I" FUND 108,364 150,500 -255,605 3,259
21 -WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
FUND
1,612,273 1,495,300 -1,711,893 1,395,680
21 -DESG WWD CAPITAL FEES 685,460 0 0 685,460
22 -CDBG FUND 0 43,933 -43,933 0
26 -LNDSCP & LGTG A.D.6,072 14,335 -18,135 2,272
Total -Other City Funds 4,044,244 3,296,130 -4,002,502 3,337,872
44 -CAPITAL PROJECT -BIKE
LANE
0 0 0 0
46 -CAPITAL IMPR-STREETS 0 538,500 -538,500 0
47 -CAP.PROJ. BARTON BRIDGE 0 0 0 0
48 -CAP.PROJ. PARK GRANT 0 1,358,540 -1,358,540 0
50 -CAP.PROJ. BOND PROCEEDS 0 1,655,000 -1,655,000 0
TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 0 3,552,040 -3,552,040 0
Total -City Funds 4,700,508 10,387,656 -10,932,634 4,155,530
3
Packet Pg. 5
31 -OBLIGATION RET FUND 0 6,575,000 0 6,575,000
32 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (459,112)0 -1,147,627 -1,606,739
32 -BOND PROCEEDS 17,133,050 0 -1,655,000 15,478,050
33 -DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,751,779 0 -5,248,242 -3,496,463
34 -LOW MOD INC HSG FUND 574,961 0 -300,000 274,961
37 -CRA PROJECT FUND 966,000 0 -241,500 724,500
Total - Successor Funds 19,966,678 6,575,000 -8,592,369 17,949,309
Grand Total -All Funds 24,667,186 16,903,986 -19,525,003 22,104,839
The Fund Summary reflects two items which the Council should be aware of. The first
is that $75,000 in General Fund expenditures during FY 2012-13 have been reallocated
to bond and grant projects. The second is the vacant Assistant to the City Manager
(ATCM) position has been defunded and funds added for a part-time Human Resources
Technician to handle the mandated responsibilities (personnel and risk management) of
the former ATCM position (savings of $55,718). The combined savings to the General
Fund for these two items is $130,718 and is included in the table above.
It is important to note while the General Fund, as shown in the FY 2012-13 Fund
Summary, appears to be in balance that this is the "best case" scenario and likely not to
be achieved. It would have been the “actual case” for the City if the former
redevelopment agency had not been dissolved.
The Child Care Fund (Fund 9) is a new fund for FY 2012-13. At the March 31 Budget
Workshop, the Council requested the Child Care budget be separated from the rest of
the General Fund budget to make it easier to discern if Child Care is a self supporting
operation, including overhead charges. While Child Care shows a deficit of $85,950 in
the Fund Summary, possible corrective action and a policy issue will be provided in the
Child Care section below.
Other City Funds (Fund 11 through Fund 26) and the Capital Funds (Fund 44 through
Fund 48) are in balance the FY 2012-13 budget. The negative ending fund balance for
Gas Tax (Fund 16), CDBG (Fund 22) and Capital Improvements-Streets (Fund 46) are
due to the timing of when revenue is received.
Included as attachments are the FY 2012-13 Fund Balance Summary, General Fund
Expenditure and Revenue reports, and Expenditure and Revenue reports for the other
funds. These documents form the basis for the preliminary budget for FY 2012-13.
They will be updated with the most current information, and presented in the City’s
formal budget format when the proposed budget is presented at the June 12 Council
Meeting.
General Fund and Successor Agency
The presentation of the General Fund and the Successor Agency funds in the FY 2012-
13 Fund Summary needs to be viewed "best case" since they may be significantly
3
Packet Pg. 6
impacted by California Department of Finance (DoF) decisions on the Successor
Agency's Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS). Three letters are
included as attachments which provide detail on Successor Agency obligations which
could have significant impacts to the City's budget:
§ DoF letter of April 26, 2012 which identifies three items in the Successor Agency’s
first ROPS (ROPS1) which DoF presents as not qualifying as enforceable obligations
(residual receipts, housing set-aside, and administrative costs).
§ Jones & Mayer letter of May 7, 2012 which responds to the April 26 DoF letter.
§ DoF letter of May 11, 2012 which identifies one item in the Successor Agency’s
second ROPS (ROPS 2) as not qualifying as an enforceable obligation (taxable bond
proceeds). At the time this staff report was submitted for the agenda, May 16, the
Successor Agency’s attorney had not finalized the written response to the May 11
DoF letter.
The DoF’s letters identify two items which could have an immediate impact on the City’s
operating budget (residual receipts and administrative costs) and two items which could
affect the fund balance of Successor Agency Funds 33 and 34 (Debt Service, Bond
Proceeds, and Low-Moderate Income Housing). Of particular concern are residual
receipts and administrative costs because they could impact the FY 2011-12 and FY
2012-13 General Fund budgets. Staff has identified five possible outcomes for the
General Fund depending on the DoF’s final ruling on these items. A summary of these
outcomes is shown below:
FY 2012-13 General Fund / Successor Agency Budget Assumptions
Description Best Case Possible
Case #1
Possible
Case #2
Possible
Case #3
Worst
Case
Revised Beginning Fund Balance 656,264 656,264 531,264 356,264 284,439
Revised Revenues 3,539,486 3,539,486 3,239,486 3,239,486 3,239,486
Revised Expenditures -3,378,092 -3,856,167 -3,856,167 -3,856,167 -3,856,167
Ending Fund Balance 817,658 339,583 -85,417 -260,417 -332,242
Notes:
Best Case: No SA impacts in FY 11-12 or FY 12-13
Possible Case #1: No SA impacts in FY 11-12. In FY 12-13 GF picks up excess SA admin exp but keeps Residual Receipts.
Possible Case #2: GF looses 5 months of Residual Receipts in FY 11-12 & all in FY 12-13. GF picks up excess SA admin exp in FY 12-13.
Possible Case #3: GF looses all Residual Receipts in FY 11-12 and FY 12-13. GF picks up excess SA admin exp in FY 12-13.
Worst Case: GF looses all Residual Receipts in FY 11-12 and FY 12-13. GF picks up excess SA admin exp in FY 11-12 & FY 12-13.
For residual receipts, an expenditure of the Successor Agency and revenue to the
General Fund, the question is whether the DoF will allow the continuation of this
affordable housing obligation. If the decision is “yes” then the “best case” and “possible
case #1” maintain the residual receipts revenue for the General Fund in FY 2011-12
and going forward. If the decision is “no” then the question becomes when would the
residual receipts revenue end? Since it was encumbered when the FY 2011-12 budget
was adopted, the Successor Agency’s attorney has argued that the General Fund
should receive the revenue for FY 2011-12 (“best case” and “possible case #1”).
Another possibility is that residual receipts could be prorated since the former
3
Packet Pg. 7
redevelopment agency was dissolved on February 1, 2012 (“possible case #2”). In
either case, under this outcome, there would be no residual receipts in FY 2012-13 or
going forward (“possible case #3” and “worst case”).
For administrative expenses which exceed the allowance (5% in FY 2011-12 and
$250,000 in FY 2012-13 and going forward), the question is whether other sources of
funds in the Successor Agency can cover these expenses ($71,825 in FY 2011-12 and
$478,074 in FY 2012-13). If the decision is “yes” then the “best case” may occur
(“possible case #1” and “possible case #2” could also occur depending on what
happens with residual receipts). If the decision is “no” the “possible case #3” or “worst
case” would happen. For the $71,825 in Successor Agency expenses which exceed
the 5% allowance, they would have to be absorbed by the General Fund’s fund balance
because there is not enough time to reduce expenses by this amount. For the
$478,075 in Successor Agency expenses which would exceed the $250,000 allowance
in FY 2012-13, budget reductions would be needed in the General Fund while the
Successor Agency works to reduce administrative costs in subsequent years.
An unfavorable DoF decision on residual receipts, administrative expenses or both
would put the General Fund budget for FY 2012-13 in a least favorable outcome
(“possible case #2”, “possible case number #3” or “worst case”) and would require
budget reductions unless revenues can be increased. This could include filled positions
at City Hall with the focus on keeping mandated services through either outsourcing or
contracting. Discussion on which positions could be impacted is planned for the June
12 Council Meeting, at which time the City will hopefully have more clarity from the DoF
on the residual receipts revenue to the General Fund and the Successor Agency’s
administrative expenses.
Governor's May Revise 2011
The Governor's May Revise for the state's budget, released on May 14, 2012,
mentioned redevelopment "clean up" legislation which is included as an attachment. If
this legislation were passed in its current form there are two areas of immediate
concern. The first is that the administration cost allowance for ROPS1 would be
reduced to from the full fiscal year to six months [proposed amended Health & Safety
Code 34177(b)] which would be a reduction of $228,918 in actual expenses which
would have to be absorbed by the General Fund. The second is whether the use of
Successor Agency fund balance or other Successor Agency sources of funds (e.g.
rental or interest income) will be allowed to pay for the $71,825 in Successor Agency
expenses which exceed the 5% allowance in ROPS1. Below is the FY 2012-13
General Fund/Successor Agency Budget Assumptions with the potential May
Revise impacts:
FY 2012-13 General Fund / Successor Agency Budget Assumptions
(includes potential RDA clean-up legislation impacts)
Description Best Case Possible
Case #1
Possible
Case #2
Possible
Case #3
Worst
Case
Beginning Fund Balance 656,264 656,264 531,264 356,264 284,439
Revenues 3,539,486 3,539,486 3,239,486 3,239,486 3,239,486
3
Packet Pg. 8
Expenditures -3,378,092 -3,856,167 -3,856,167 -3,856,167 -3,856,167
Decrease 5% SA admin allowance
by 50% (expenses to GF) ROPS1
-228,918 -228,918 -228,918 -228,918 -228,918
$71,825 excess admin in ROPS 1
not charged to SA fund balance
-71,825 -71,825 -71,825 -71,825 -71,825
Ending Fund Balance 516,915 38,840 -386,160 -561,160 -632,985
Local Revenue Measure
While the Council has had some general discussion on a potential local revenue
measure, there has been no formal revenue analysis or resident survey performed to
provide the Council with data specific to Grand Terrace. Staff could prepare a revenue
analysis for a local sales tax or parcel tax. A revenue analysis for a utility users tax
would need to be done by a consultant with expertise in this area and access to utility
data not readily available to the City. A resident survey could include obtaining
information on the priority residents place on various services provided by the City.
Such information would be useful in evaluating a local revenue measure or, if a local
revenue measure is not pursued, in determining which services will be reduced so that
the City maintains a balanced budget.
Policy Question: Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General Fund
appropriation of $25,000 for a utility user tax revenue analysis and
resident survey?
Child Care Fund
Moving Child Care expenditures, revenues and overhead allocation from the General
Fund to Fund 9 highlights that it will not be a full-cost recovery operation in FY 2012-13,
without mitigating action. To assist with this, the Child Care budget has been allocated
into its four primary programs --Infant, Tiny Tot, Pre-School and After School. This
information is summarized below, with further detail included as an attachment:
FY 2012-13 Child Care Fund Budget
(by program type)
Description Infant Tiny Tot Pre-School After School Total
Revenues 146,093 61,220 482,591 276,493 966,397
Expenditures (Direct)-116,834 -76,983 -228,994 -66,629 -489,440
Indirect Costs (Child Care)-74,446 -59,259 -170,323 -60,012 -364,040
Overhead Allocation -47,471 -31,279 -93,044 -27,072 -198,866
Total -92,658 -106,301 -9,770 122,780 -85,949
As can be seen in the table above, only the After School program is full cost recovery
and is to some degree subsidizing the other Child Care programs. Pre-School program
revenues cover direct and indirect costs and nearly all of its overhead. Infant program
revenues cover direct costs and the much of its indirect costs but not overhead. Tiny
Tot revenue does not cover even its direct costs. With this information known, Child
Care is evaluating the fees charged in the Infant, Tiny Tot and Pre-School programs
and will be recommending potential increases in the proposed budget to be presented
at the June 12 Council Meeting.
3
Packet Pg. 9
Unlike other services provided by the City, childcare is a service also provided by the
private for profit and non profit sectors. Child Care is by far the largest portion of the
City’s operating budget devoted to non mandated services. For comparison purposes
only, the City’s anticipated expenditures in FY 2012-13 for two other non mandated
services, Parks and the Senior Center, are anticipated to be $155,605 and $27,000
respectively.
Depending on the effectiveness of expenditure reductions and fee increases, the City
may need to evaluate if the Child Care operation (including the facility) should be sold.
This could free Child Care from its share of the City’s administrative overhead which is
$198,867. Such a sale could also bring one-time revenue to the General Fund. In
order to properly evaluate a possible sale the potential value of the Child Care operation
needs to be determined.
Policy Question:Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General Fund
appropriation of $6,000 for an appraisal of the Child Care operation
and real property?
In addition to policy issues already identified, there is one other which needs Council
consideration before the proposed budget is presented at the June 12 Council.
Paramedic Supplies
The City has been actively seeking $47,000 in donations for the one-time purchase of
paramedic supplies in return for the San Bernardino County Fire Department providing
a firefighter/paramedic at the Grand Terrace Fire station on an on-going basis. At the
time this staff report was submitted for the agenda, May 16, donations of $28,695 have
been pledged or received.
Policy Question: Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General Fund
appropriation for the balance of funds needed for the one-time
purchase of paramedic supplies?
The discussion on the preliminary budget for FY 2012-13 identified three potential policy
questions which are summarized below:
Potential Policy Questions Raised in Preliminary FY 2012-13 Budget
#Question Cost Potential to
Generate Revenue?
1 Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General
Fund appropriation of $25,000 for a utility user tax revenue
analysis and resident survey?
25,000 Yes
2 Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General
Fund appropriation of $6,000 for an appraisal of the Child
Care operation and real property?
6,000 Yes
3 Should the FY 2012-13 proposed budget include a General
Fund appropriation for the balance of funds needed for the
one-time purchase of paramedic supplies?
18,305 No
Total 49,305
3
Packet Pg. 10
If funding for the potential policy questions were included in the proposed FY 2012-13
budget to be presented on June 12, with no other changes made, it would impact the
five possible outcomes for the General Fund as shown below:
FY 2012-13 General Fund / Successor Agency Budget Assumptions
(with Policy Questions funding included)
Description Best
Case
Possible
Case #1
Possible
Case #2
Possible
Case #3
Worst
Case
Ending Fund Balance 817,658 339,583 -85,417 -260,417 -332,242
Funding for Policy Questions -49,305 -49,305 -49,305 -49,305 -49,305
Revised Ending Fund Balance 768,353 290,278 -134,722 -309,722 -381,547
It should be noted that the revised ending fund balance amounts for the five cases do
not include any potential revenue which could be possible for three of the policy
questions nor are the potential impacts for the Governor’s proposed redevelopment
“clean up legislation” included.
Special Budget Meeting on June 5
With the uncertain status of Successor Agency obligations that could significantly
impact the General Fund in a negative way, the Council may wish to schedule a Special
Meeting on the budget for June 5. The City may receive the DOF's response to the
letter sent by the Successor Agency's attorney before then which could provide
clarification on how severely the General Fund may be impacted.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impacts of the preliminary budget for FY 2012-13 are included in the
discussion section of the staff report. If the DoF provides further clarification soon on
the items identified in either ROPS1 or ROPS2 it is anticipated that significant updates
could be made to the proposed budget for Council consideration on June 12.
It is important to note that the City’s first payment on the $3,388,091 loan from the
former redevelopment agency is due in FY 2012-13. This payment will be made by a
balance sheet transfer of funds (available cash) from the General Fund to the
Successor Agency. If this payment were included as part of the FY 2012-13 budget,
then the ending fund balance would be reduced by $147,308 for each of the General
Fund budget cases.
It should also be noted that the preliminary budget for FY 2012-13 does not include any
one-time revenue for turning the Successor Agency's liquid assets over to the Auditor-
Controller for disbursement to the taxing entities, which would include the City. With the
uncertainty of some of the Successor Agency's enforceable obligations, and audits of
the Successor Agency to be done in FY 2012-13, it is possible the liquid assets may be
retained by the Successor Agency for much of the fiscal year.
ATTACHMENTS:
3
Packet Pg. 11
·Fund Balance Projected FYE 12-13
·DOF Letter of April 26_2012 on ROPS1
·Jones_Mayer Letter of May 7_2012 ROPS1 Response
·[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition
·DOF Letter of May 11_2012 on ROPS2
·Child Care Program Analysis Prior to Rate Increase
·General Fund Revenue FY Budget 12-13
·General Fund Expenditures FY Budget 12-13
·NON-GF-OTHER Fund Expenditures FY Budget 12-13
·NON-GF-OTHER Fund Revenues FY Budget 12-13
APPROVALS:
Betsy Adams Completed 05/16/2012 5:44 PM
Finance Completed 05/16/2012 8:04 PM
City Attorney Completed 05/17/2012 10:22 AM
City Manager Completed 05/17/2012 2:15 PM
City Council Pending
3
Packet Pg. 12
Beg.
Estimated
Fund
Balance
Revised Budget
FY 2012-13
Revenue
Revised
Budget
FY 2012-13
Expend
June 30, 2013
Projected
Fund
Balance
TOTAL 10- GENERAL FUND 656,264 3,539,486 (3,378,092)817,658
09 - CHILD CARE 0 966,397 (1,052,347)(85,950)
11 - STREET FUND 993,540 7,000 (366,284)634,256
12 - STORM DRAIN FUND 67,252 350 0 67,602
13 - PARK FUND 225,676 7,100 (17,385)215,391
14 - SLESF (AB3229 COPS)0 100,000 (100,000)0
15 - AIR QUALITY IMPRV. FUND 68,460 14,250 0 82,710
16 - GAS TAX FUND 78,669 425,265 (383,280)120,654
17 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND (9,826)71,500 (53,640)8,034
19 - FACILITIES FUND 208,304 200 0 208,504
20 - MEASURE "I" FUND 108,364 150,500 (255,605)3,259
21 - WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 1,612,273 1,495,300 (1,711,893)1,395,680
21 - DESG WWD CAPITAL FEES 685,460 0 0 685,460
22 - CDBG FUND 0 43,933 (43,933)0
26 - LNDSCP & LGTG A.D.6,072 14,335 (18,135)2,272
TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 4,044,244 3,296,130 (4,002,502)3,337,872
44 - CAPITAL PROJECT - BIKE LANE 0 0 0 0
46 - CAPITAL IMPR- STREETS 0 538,500 (538,500)0
47 - CAP.PROJ. BARTON BRIDGE 0 0 0 0
48 - CAP.PROJ. PARK GRANT 0 1,358,540 (1,358,540)0
50 - CAP.PROJ. BOND PROCEEDS 0 1,655,000 (1,655,000)0
TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 0 3,552,040 (3,552,040)0
TOTAL CITY FUNDS 4,700,508 10,387,656 (10,932,634)4,155,530
31 - OBLIGATION RET FUND 0 6,575,000 0 6,575,000
32 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (459,112)0 (1,147,627)(1,606,739)
32 - BOND PROCEEDS 17,133,050 0 (1,655,000)15,478,050
33 - DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,751,779 0 (5,248,242)(3,496,463)
34 - LOW MOD INC HSG FUND 574,961 0 (300,000)274,961
37 - CRA PROJECT FUND 966,000 0 (241,500)724,500
TOTAL SUCCESSOR FUNDS 19,966,678 6,575,000 (8,592,369)17,949,309
Grand Total- ALL FUNDS 24,667,186 16,962,656 (19,525,003)22,104,839
Notes: Revenues include Transfers-In
City of Grand Terrace
Estimated Budget: FY 2012-13
Fund Balance Report
Budget through June 30, 2013
Fund Balance FYE to 6-30-13
3.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
F
Y
E
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
3.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
4
Attachment: DOF Letter of April 26_2012 on ROPS1 (1056 : Preliminary FY 2012-13 Budget)
3.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
5
Attachment: DOF Letter of April 26_2012 on ROPS1 (1056 : Preliminary FY 2012-13 Budget)
JM
JONES MAYER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3777 NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD FULLERTON CALIFORNIA 92835
714 4461400 562 6971751 FAX 714 4461448
Richard D Joces Richard L Adams II Mic6ael Q Do Robert Khuu Gregory P Palmer
Jamaar BoydWeatherby Thomas P Duarte Gary S Kranker Dawy L Peelman
Martin J Mayer Baron J Bettenhausen Elena Q Gerli Richard A McFarlane HaroldW Potter
Kimberly HallBarlow Christian L Bettenhausen Katheriae M Hardy Christopher F Neumeyer Denise L Rocawich
James R Touchstone Paul R Coble Krista MacNevin Jee KathyaM Oliva Ivy M Tsai
Ryan R Jones
aProfessional Law
Cotpotation
OfCounsel
MichaelRCapizzi Mervin D Feinstein
DeanJ Pucci
Steven N Skolnik
May 7 2012
SENT VIA US MAIL EMAIL
State of California
Department of Finance
915 L Street
Sacramento CA 95814
Email alangarrett@dofcagov
Re Deaartment of Finance Review of Successor Aencv to Citv of Grand
Terr Redevelopment Asencvs Reconized Obligation Pavment Schedule
Dear Sir or Madam
This office serves as legal counsel to the Successor to the City ofGrand Terrace Redevelopment
Agency Successor Agency I write in response to Mr Garretts email dated Apri125 2012
attached hereto and hereby object to the Department of Finances DOF improper denial of
the following enforceable obligations EO set forth in the Successor Agencys Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule ROPS
First Mr Garrett has indicated that the residual receipts page 1item 15 owed to the City of
Grand Terrace City by the former redevelopment agency are not enforceable obligations in
spite of Section 34171d3 which explicitly prohibits voiding contracts or agreements for the
provision of housing
The debt listed in item 15 is part of an affordable housing payment agreement as is noted on the
Successor Agencys ROPS The 300000 payment for fiscal year 201112 is an affordable
housing obligation and was made prior to the ROPS period though an encumbrance in Grand
Terraces lowmoderate housirig fund
3.c
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
J
o
n
e
s
_
M
a
y
e
r
L
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
M
a
y
7
_
2
0
1
2
R
O
P
S
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
State of California
Department of Finance
May 7 2012
Page 2
Mr Garrett denied the aforementioned item on the ROPS pursuant to Section 34171 d 2
without taking into consideration Section 34171d3 which provides that contracts or
agreements for the provision of housing properly authorized under Part 1commencing with
Section 33000 shall not be deemed void Mr Garretts reliance upon Section 34171d2
would render meaningless the language affirmatively providing for the provision of housing and
the continuing validity ofhousing agreements
Second Mr Garretts denied the set aside 20 percent of RDA tax increment for low and
moderate income housing purposes on page 2 line item 5 The Low and Moderate Income
Housing money was set aside as required by law prior to passage ofAB X1 26 Thus that set
aside must be honored by the DOF
Further Mr Garrett mischaracterized a number of enforceable obligations as administrative
costs to be included in that allowance These include page 1 items 22 and 30 and page 2 items
912 all of which should be funded by the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund
Specifically RSGs professional services identified in item 15 include preparing financial
documents including annual statement of indebtedness annual pass through report compute pass
through and complete annual reporting necessary
RSGs professional services are not an administrative cost but rather an enforceable obligation of
the redevelopment agency to be carried out by the successor agency as authorized under Section
34171d1F which provides for contracts or agreements necessary for the administration
or operation of the successor agency
Further Stradling Yoccas legal services provided for in line 30 are for the purpose of serving as
bond counsel for the bonds of the former redevelopment agency Stradling Yoccas legal
services are an authorized enforceable obligation under Section 34171d1A
Last the items set forth in lines 9 through 12 on page 2 ofthe ROPS are similarly
mischaracterized as administrative cost allowances when in fact they aze enforceable obligations
necessary for the administration or operation of the successor agency as authorized under
Section 34171d1F
The appropriate characterization of page l items 22 and 30 and page 2 items 912 as
enforceable obligations will bring the administrative cost allowance within the limits set forth in
Section 34171b However even assuming the administrative cost allowance did exceed the
limit those administrative costs are still an enforceable obligation so long as the Successor
Agency and Oversight Board approve such costs the administrative costs are necessary for the
3.c
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
J
o
n
e
s
_
M
a
y
e
r
L
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
M
a
y
7
_
2
0
1
2
R
O
P
S
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
State of California
Department of Finance
May 7 2012
Page 3
operation and administration ofthe successor agency and those administrative costs exceeding
the administrative allowance can be paid by other sources of funds
Please reconsider DOFs position regarding the aforementioned enforceable obligations If you
have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me
V ly yours
Kimberly Hall Barlow
Attorney for Successor Agency
cc Bernie Simon Director of Finance
3.c
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
J
o
n
e
s
_
M
a
y
e
r
L
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
M
a
y
7
_
2
0
1
2
R
O
P
S
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Subject Grand Terrace RPS Raview
On 4252Q12 at 222 PM in message 4868C7E4C828B43BD87AAB4679C3745E69FE745CCcMAILBOXCCRIDOFFINANCE Garrett A1an
AIanGarrettCdofcagov wrote
Helio Mr Simon
I just wanted to give you an update on our review of the Grand Terrace ROPS Here are our results
Fage 1 lme item 15 residua receipts in the amount of 3 miilion HSC section 34171 dj 2 states that agreements contracts or arrangements
between the city that created the redevelopment agency RDAj and the former RDA are not enforceabie uniess the agreements were entered into
within the first two years of he date of the creation of he RDA
Page 2 line item 5 fousing setaside in ihe amount of 483 million The requirement to set aside 20 percent of RUA tax increment for fow and
moderate incame housing purposes ended with the passing o the redevelopment dissalution legisiation HSC section 3417fi d requires that ail
unencumbered balances in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund be remifited to the caunty auditor contraller for distributian to the taxing
entities
Administrative expenses totaling 71825 HSC section 34171 b limits admiristrative expenses to five percent af property tax aifocated to the
successor agency or 250OOQ whichever is greater Five percent af the prpperty tax alfocated is 457835 Therefore 71825 af the claimed
529650 in administrative costs is no an E The following items are considered ta be administraive expenses
a Page 1ltems 8 1722 and 30
n Pag 2 Items 912
You will be seeing a letter in he next day or so that has this same inforrnaion
Afan Garrett Staff Analyst
DepartmeM of Finance
Office of State Audits and Evaluations
916 322985 x3330
i
3.c
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
J
o
n
e
s
_
M
a
y
e
r
L
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
M
a
y
7
_
2
0
1
2
R
O
P
S
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
1
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
Redevelopment Agencies Dissolution Clean-up and Liquid Asset Provisions
Department of Finance
May Revision
Health and Safety Code Section 34163 is amended as follows:
34163. Notwithstanding Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000), Part 1.5
(commencing with Section 34000), Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 34050), and Part
1.7 (commencing with Section 34100), or any other law, commencing on the effective
date of this part, an agency shall not have the authority to, and shall not, do any of the
following:
(a) Make loans or advances or grant or enter into agreements to provide funds or
provide financial assistance of any sort to any entity or person for any purpose,
including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Loans of moneys or any other thing of value or commitments to provide
financing to nonprofit organizations to provide those organizations with
financing for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, refinancing, or
development of multifamily rental housing or the acquisition of commercial
property for lease, each pursuant to Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section
33741) of Part 1.
(2) Loans of moneys or any other thing of value for residential construction,
improvement, or rehabilitation pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with
Section 33750) of Part 1. These include, but are not limited to, construction
loans to purchasers of residential housing, mortgage loans to purchasers of
residential housing, and loans to mortgage lenders, or any other entity, to aid
in financing pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 33750).
(3) The purchase, by an agency, of mortgage or construction loans from
mortgage lenders or from any other entities.
(b) Enter into contracts with, incur obligations, or make commitments to, any entity,
whether governmental, tribal, or private, or any individual or groups of individuals
for any purpose, including, but not limited to, loan agreements, passthrough
agreements, regulatory agreements, services contracts, leases, disposition and
development agreements, joint exercise of powers agreements, contracts for the
purchase of capital equipment, agreements for redevelopment activities,
including, but not limited to, agreements for planning, design, redesign,
development, demolition, alteration, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation,
site remediation, site development or improvement, removal of graffiti, land
clearance, and seismic retrofits.
(c) Amend or modify existing agreements, obligations, or commitments with any
entity, for any purpose, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
3.d
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
2
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(1) Renewing or extending term of leases or other agreements, except that the
agency may extend lease space for its own use to a date not to exceed six
months after the effective date of the act adding this part and for a rate no
more than 5 percent above the rate the agency currently pays on a monthly
basis.
(2) Modifying terms and conditions of existing agreements, obligations, or
commitments.
(3) Forgiving all or any part of the balance owed to the agency on existing loans
or extend the term or change the terms and conditions of existing loans.
(4) Increasing its Make any future deposits to the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund created pursuant to Section 33334.3 beyond the minimum
level that applied to it as of January 1, 2011.
(5) Transferring funds out of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund,
except to meet the minimum housing-related obligations that existed as of
January 1, 2011, to make required payments under Sections 33690 and
33690.5, and to borrow funds pursuant to Section 34168.5.
(d) Dispose of assets by sale, long-term lease, gift, grant, exchange, transfer,
assignment, or otherwise, for any purpose, including, but not limited to, any of the
following:
(1) Assets, including, but not limited to, real property, deeds of trust, and
mortgages held by the agency, moneys, accounts receivable, contract rights,
proceeds of insurance claims, grant proceeds, settlement payments, rights to
receive rents, and any other rights to payment of whatever kind.
(2) Real property, including, but not limited to, land, land under water and
waterfront property, buildings, structures, fixtures, and improvements on the
land, any property appurtenant to, or used in connection with, the land, every
estate, interest, privilege, easement, franchise, and right in land, including
rights-of-way, terms for years, and liens, charges, or encumbrances by way
of judgment, mortgage, or otherwise, and the indebtedness secured by the
liens.
(e) Acquire real property by any means for any purpose, including, but not limited to,
the purchase, lease, or exercising of an option to purchase or lease, exchange,
subdivide, transfer, assume, obtain option upon, acquire by gift, grant, bequest,
devise, or otherwise acquire any real property, any interest in real property, and
any improvements on it, including the repurchase of developed property
previously owned by the agency and the acquisition of real property by eminent
domain; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision is intended to prohibit
the acceptance or transfer of title for real property acquired prior to the effective
date of this part.
(f) Transfer, assign, vest, or delegate any of its assets, funds, rights, powers,
ownership interests, or obligations for any purpose to any entity, including, but
3.d
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
3
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
not limited to, the community, the legislative body, another member of a joint
powers authority, a trustee, a receiver, a partner entity, another agency, a
nonprofit corporation, a contractual counterparty, a public body, a limited-equity
housing cooperative, the state, a political subdivision of the state, the federal
government, any private entity, or an individual or group of individuals.
(g) Accept financial or other assistance from the state or federal government or any
public or private source if the acceptance necessitates or is conditioned upon the
agency incurring indebtedness as that term is described in this part.
Health and Safety Code Section 34171 is amended as follows:
(a) "Administrative budget" means the budget for administrative costs of the successor
agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b) "Administrative cost allowance" means an amount that, subject to the approval of
the oversight board, is payable from property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the
property tax allocated to the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule covering the period January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 for the 2011-12
fiscal year and up to 3 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment
Obligation Retirement Fund money that is allocated to the successor agency for each
fiscal year thereafter; provided, however, that the amount shall not be less than two
hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for any fiscal year or such lesser amount as
agreed to by the successor agency. However, the allowance amount shall exclude, and
shall not apply to, any administrative costs that can be paid from bond proceeds or from
sources other than property tax. Administrative cost allowances shall not include any
litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and
costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition.
(c) "Designated local authority" shall mean a public entity formed pursuant to
subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d) (1) "Enforceable obligation" means any of the following:
(A) Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued pursuant to Section 58383
of the Government Code, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides, and
any other payments required under the indenture or similar documents governing the
issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment agency. A reserve may
be held when required by the bond indenture or when the next property tax allocation will
be insufficient to pay all obligations due under the provisions of the bond for the next
payment due in the following half of the calendar year.
(B) Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency for a lawful purpose, to
the extent they are legally required to be repaid pursuant to a required repayment
schedule or other mandatory loan terms.
(C) Payments required by the federal government, preexisting obligations to the state
or obligations imposed by state law, other than passthrough payments that are made by
the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable payments
required in connection with the agencies' employees, including, but not limited to,
pension payments, pension obligation debt service, unemployment payments, or other
obligations conferred through a collective bargaining agreement.
(D) Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of law or binding
arbitration decisions against the former redevelopment agency, other than passthrough
payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183.
3.d
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
4
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have the authority and
standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E) Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract that is not otherwise
void as violating the debt limit or public policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit
either the successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the oversight board,
or the oversight board itself from terminating any existing agreements or contracts and
providing any necessary and required compensation or remediation for such termination.
(F) Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or operation of the
successor agency, in accordance with this part, including, but not limited to, agreements
to purchase or rent office space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses
pursuant to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section 33134.
(G) Amounts borrowed from or payments owing to the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency, which had been deferred as of the effective
date of the act adding this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is
approved by the oversight board.
(2) For purposes of this part, “enforceable obligation” does not include any agreements;
cooperative agreements; contracts; plans; or commitments to pay for projects, to the extent that
no third party contract to perform exists; or other arrangements between the city, county, or city
and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency..
However, written agreements entered into (A) at the time of issuance, but in no event
later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and (B) solely for the
purpose of securing or repaying those indebtedness obligations may be deemed
enforceable obligations for purposes of this part. Notwithstanding this paragraph, loan
agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city
and county
that created it, within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency,
may be deemed to be enforceable obligations.
(3) Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment agency and other
public agencies, to perform services or provide funding for governmental or private
services or capital projects outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide
benefit to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized under Part 1
(commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed void on the effective date of this
part; provided, however, that such contracts or agreements for the provision of housing
properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall not be deemed
void.
(e) "Indebtedness obligations" means bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or
other evidence of indebtedness, issued or delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by
a joint exercise of powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to third-party
investors or bondholders to finance or refinance redevelopment projects undertaken by
the redevelopment agency in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part
1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(f) "Oversight board" shall mean each entity established pursuant to Section 34179.
(g) "Recognized obligation" means an obligation listed in the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule.
(h) "Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule" means the document setting forth the
minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable
obligations for each six-month fiscal period as provided in subdivision (m) (l) of Section
34177.
(i) "School entity" means any entity defined as such in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code.
3.d
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
5
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(j) "Successor agency" means the county, city, or city and county that authorized the
creation of each redevelopment agency or another entity as provided in Section 34173.
(k) "Taxing entities" means cities, counties, a city and county, special districts, and
school entities, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code, that receive passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant to
the provisions of this part.
(l) “Property taxes” include all property tax revenues including those from unitary and
supplemental tax increment.
Health and Safety Code Section 34173 is amended as follows:
34173. (a) Successor agencies, as defined in this part, are hereby designated as
successor entities to the former redevelopment agencies.
(b) Except for those provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law that are
repealed, restricted, or revised pursuant to the act adding this part, all authority, rights,
powers, duties, and obligations previously vested with the former redevelopment
agencies, under the Community Redevelopment Law, are hereby vested in the
successor agencies.
(c) (1) Where the redevelopment agency was in the form of a joint powers authority,
and where the joint powers agreement governing the formation of the joint powers
authority addresses the allocation of assets and liabilities upon dissolution of the joint
powers authority, then each of the entities that created the former redevelopment
agency may be a successor agency within the meaning of this part and each shall have
a share of assets and liabilities based on the provisions of the joint powers agreement.
(2) Where the redevelopment agency was in the form of a joint powers authority, and
where the joint powers agreement governing the formation of the joint powers authority
does not address the allocation of assets and liabilities upon dissolution of the joint
powers authority, then each of the entities that created the former redevelopment
agency may be a successor agency within the meaning of this part, a proportionate
share of the assets and liabilities shall be based on the assessed value in the project
areas within each entity's jurisdiction, as determined by the county assessor, in its
jurisdiction as compared to the assessed value of land within the boundaries of the
project areas of the former redevelopment agency.
(d) (1) A city, county, city and county, or the entities forming the joint powers authority
that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency may elect not to serve as a
successor agency under this part. A city, county, city and county, or any member of a
joint powers authority that elects not to serve as a successor agency under this part
must file a copy of a duly authorized resolution of its governing board to that effect with
the county auditor-controller no later than one month prior to the effective date of this
part.
(2) The determination of the first local agency that elects to become the successor
agency shall be made by the county auditor-controller based on the earliest receipt by
the county auditor-controller of a copy of a duly adopted resolution of the local agency's
governing board authorizing such an election. As used in this section, "local agency"
means any city, county, city and county, or special district in the county of the former
redevelopment agency.
(3) If no local agency elects to serve as a successor agency for a dissolved
redevelopment agency, a public body, referred to herein as a "designated local
authority" shall be immediately formed, pursuant to this part, in the county and shall be
3.d
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
6
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
vested with all the powers and duties of a successor agency as described in this part.
The Governor shall appoint three residents of the county to serve as the governing
board of the authority. The designated local authority shall serve as successor agency
until a local agency elects to become the successor agency in accordance with this
section.
(4) Designated local authority members shall have personal immunity from suit for their
actions taken within the scope of their responsibilities as designated local authority
members.
(e) The liability of any successor agency, acting pursuant to the powers granted under
the act adding this part, shall be limited to the extent of the total sum of property tax
revenues it receives pursuant to this part and the value of assets transferred to it as a
successor agency for a dissolved redevelopment agency.
(f) Any existing cleanup plans and liability limits authorized under the Polanco
Redevelopment Act shall transfer to the successor agency.
(g) A successor agency is a separate public entity from the public agency that provides
for its governance and may not merge with the sponsoring city. The liabilities of the
redevelopment agency do not transfer to the city and the assets do not become city
assets. A successor agency has its own name, can be sued, and can sue. All litigation
involving a redevelopment agency automatically transfers to the successor agency. The
separate redevelopment agency employees do not automatically become city
employees and the successor agency retains its own collective bargaining status. As
successors, successor agencies succeed to the organizational status of the
redevelopment agency, but without any legal authority to participate in redevelopment
activities.
(h) A city may loan or grant funds to a successor agency for administrative costs,
enforceable obligations, or project related expenses at the city’s discretion, but receipt
and use of these funds must be reflected on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule or the administrative budget and therefore is subject to the oversight and
approval of the oversight board.
Health and Safety Code Section 34175 is amended as follows:
34175. (a) It is the intent of this part that pledges of revenues associated with
enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies are to be honored. It is
intended that the cessation of any redevelopment agency shall not affect either the
pledge, the legal existence of that pledge, or the stream of revenues available to meet
the requirements of the pledge.
(b) All assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and
equipment of the former redevelopment agency are transferred on February 1, 2012, to
the control of the successor agency, for administration pursuant to the provisions of this
part. This includes all cash or cash equivalents and amounts owed to the
redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012. Any legal or contractual restrictions on
the use of funds or assets also transfer to the successor agency.
34176. (a) The city, county, or city and county that authorized the creation of a
redevelopment agency may elect to retain the housing assets and functions previously
performed by the redevelopment agency. If a city, county, or city and county elects to
retain the responsibility for performing authority to perform housing functions previously
performed by a redevelopment agency, all rights, powers, duties, and obligations, all
3.d
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
7
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
property and other housing assets, as defined in subdivision (d) excluding any amounts
on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, shall be transferred to the
city, county, or city and county. Identification of housing assets and transfer of title shall
be authorized by resolution of the oversight board.
(b) If a city, county, or city and county does not elect to retain the responsibility for
performing housing functions previously performed by a redevelopment agency, all
rights, powers, assets, liabilities, duties, and obligations associated with the housing
activities of the agency, excluding any amounts in the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund, shall be transferred as follows:
(1) Where there is no local housing authority in the territorial jurisdiction of the former
redevelopment agency, to the Department of Housing and Community Development.
(2) Where there is one local housing authority in the territorial jurisdiction of the former
redevelopment agency, to that local housing authority.
(3) Where there is more than one local housing authority in the territorial jurisdiction of
the former redevelopment agency, to the local housing authority selected by the city,
county, or city and county that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency.
(c) Commencing on the operative date of this part, the entity to which housing assets are
transferred assuming the housing functions formerly performed by the redevelopment
agency may enforce affordability covenants and perform related activities pursuant to
applicable provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with
Section 33000), including, but not limited to, Section 33418. The housing successor may
exercise any rights, powers, and duties with respect to housing assets it receives that
apply by virtue of contract, federal law, or conditions of receipt of funds by the
redevelopment agency.
(d) “Housing asset” includes the following:
1) Any real property, interest in, or restriction on the use of real property, whether
improved or not, and any personal property provided in residences (such as
furniture and appliances) that was acquired for housing purposes (either by
purchase or through a loan) in whole or part with funds from the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund .
2) Any funds that are encumbered by an enforceable obligation to build or acquire
low and moderate income housing as low and moderate income housing is
defined by the Community Redevelopment Law.
3) Any loan or grant receivable, funded from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund, from homebuyers, home owners, nonprofit or for-profit
developers and other parties that require occupancy by persons of low or
moderate income as defined in Community Redevelopment law.
4) Any funds derived from rents or operation of properties by other parties that
were financed in whole or part with Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
funds, including residual receipt payments from developers, conditional grant
repayments, cost savings and proceeds from refinancing, and principal and
interest payments from homebuyers subject to enforceable income limits.
3.d
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
8
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
5) A stream of rents or other payments from housing tenants or operators of low
and moderate income housing financed in whole or part with Low and Moderate
Income Housing Fund funds that are used to maintain, operate, and enforce the
affordability of housing or for enforceable obligations associated with low and
moderate income housing.
(e) When a development includes both low and moderate income housing that meets the
definition of housing asset under subdivision (d) and other types of property use,
including but not limited to commercial use, governmental use, open space and parks,
the oversight board shall consider the overall value to the community as well as the
benefit to taxing agencies of keeping the entire development intact or dividing the title
and control over the property between the housing successor and the redevelopment
successor agency or other public or private agencies. Disposition of such assets may be
accomplished with a revenue sharing agreement.
Health and Safety Code Section 34177 is amended as follows:
34177. Successor agencies are required to do all of the following:
(a) Continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations.
(1) On and after October 1, 2011, and until a Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule becomes operative, only payments required pursuant to an enforceable
obligations payment schedule shall be made. The initial enforceable obligation payment
schedule shall be the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency under Section
34169. However, payments associated with obligations excluded from the definition of
enforceable obligations by paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 34171 shall be
excluded from the enforceable obligations payment schedule and be removed from the
last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency under Section 34169 prior to the
successor agency adopting it as its enforceable obligations payment schedule pursuant
to this subdivision. The enforceable obligation payment schedule may be amended by
the successor agency at any public meeting and shall be subject to the approval of the
oversight board as soon as the board has sufficient members to form a quorum.
In recognition of the fact that the timing of the California Supreme Court’s ruling in the
case California Redevelopment Association et al. v. Matosantos et al., delayed the
preparation by successor agencies and the approval by oversight boards of the January
1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, a successor
agency may amend the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule to authorize the
continued payment of enforceable obligations until such time as the January 1, 2012
through June 30, 2012 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule has been approved by
the oversight board and by the Department of Finance.
(2) The Department of Finance and the Controller shall each have the authority to
require any documents associated with the enforceable obligations to be provided to
them in a manner of their choosing. Any taxing entity, the department, and the Controller
shall each have standing to file a judicial action to prevent a violation under this part and
to obtain injunctive or other appropriate relief. The county auditor-controller, the
department, and the Controller shall each have the authority to require the return of
funds improperly spent or transferred to a public entity in conflict with the provisions of
this part or part 1.8 within 60 days. If funds are not returned within that time, the funds
may be recovered through an offset of sales and use tax or property tax allocations to
3.d
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
9
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
the local agency. The Board of Equalization shall promptly make such offset when
ordered by the Department of Finance or the Controller. The county auditor-controller
may reduce the property tax allocations to any local agency in the county that fails to
repay funds within 60 days if the Department of Finance or the Controller has not
ordered an offset of sales and use tax allocations. The county auditor-controller, the
department, and the Controller shall each have the authority to demand the return of
funds improperly spent or transferred to a private person or other private entity within 60
days. If funds are not repaid after this time, they may be recovered through any lawful
means of collection and are subject to a ten percent penalty plus interest at the rate
charged for late personal income tax payments from the date the improper payment was
made to the date the money is repaid.
(3) Commencing on January 1, 2012, only those payments listed in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule may be made by the successor agency from the funds
specified in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. In addition, commencing
January 1, 2012, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall supersede the
Statement of Indebtedness, which shall no longer be prepared nor have any effect under
the Community Redevelopment Law.
(4) Nothing in the act adding this part is to be construed as preventing a successor
agency, with the prior approval of the oversight board, as described in Section 34179,
from making payments for enforceable obligations from sources other than those listed
in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(5) From October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, a successor agency shall have no authority
and is hereby prohibited from accelerating payment or making any lump-sum payments
that are intended to prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required
prior to the effective date of this part.
(b) List on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period July 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012 any amounts owed by a redevelopment agency to an
affected taxing entity pursuant to Sections 33401, 33492.140, 33607, 33607.5, 33607.7,
or 33676, or pursuant to any passthrough agreement entered into before January 1,
1994 between a redevelopment agency and an affected taxing entity, to the extent the
redevelopment agency failed to remit those amounts owed for the period July 1, 2011
through February 1, 2012.
(1) If the successor agency fails to list on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule the amounts referenced in subdivision (b), the county auditor-controller shall
make the required payments to the affected taxing jurisdictions by reducing the amounts
to which the successor agency would otherwise be entitled pursuant to paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 34183. If this amount is not sufficient to make the required
payment, the county auditor-controller shall then reduce the amounts to which the
successor agency would otherwise be entitled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 34183. If this amount is not sufficient to make the required payment, the
successor agency shall list the remaining owed amount on each subsequent
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until such time as the owed amount is fully
paid. If the successor agency fails to list the owed amounts on the subsequent
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules, the county auditor-controller shall apply the
provisions of this paragraph as appropriate, until the owed amount is fully paid.
(b) (c) Maintain reserves in the amount required by indentures, trust indentures, or
similar documents governing the issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(c) (d) Perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation.
3.d
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
10
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(d) (e) Remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds to the county
auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing entities, including, but not limited to, the
unencumbered balance of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a former
redevelopment agency. In making the distribution, the county auditor-controller shall
utilize the same methodology for allocation and distribution of property tax revenues
provided in Section 34188.
(e) (f) Dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as
directed by the oversight board; provided, however, that the oversight board may instead
direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 34181. The disposal is to be done expeditiously and in a
manner aimed at maximizing value. Proceeds from asset sales and related funds that
are no longer needed for approved development projects or to otherwise wind down the
affairs of the agency, each as determined by the oversight board, shall be transferred to
the county auditor-controller for distribution as property tax proceeds under Section
34188.
(f) (g) Enforce all former redevelopment agency rights for the benefit of the taxing
entities, including, but not limited to, continuing to collect loans, rents, and other
revenues that were due to the redevelopment agency.
(g) (h) Effectuate transfer of housing functions and assets to the appropriate entity
designated pursuant to Section 34176.
(h) (i) Expeditiously wind down the affairs of the redevelopment agency pursuant to
the provisions of this part and in accordance with the direction of the oversight board.
(i) (j) Continue to oversee development of properties until the contracted work has
been completed or the contractual obligations of the former redevelopment agency can
be transferred to other parties. Bond proceeds shall be used for the purposes for which
bonds were sold unless the purposes can no longer be achieved, in which case,
the proceeds may be used to defease the bonds.
(j) (k) Prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to the oversight board
for its approval. The proposed administrative budget shall include all of the following:
(1) Estimated amounts for successor agency administrative costs for the upcoming six-
month fiscal period.
(2) Proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in paragraph (1).
(3) Proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations services provided by
a city, county, city and county, or other entity.
(k) (l) Provide administrative cost estimates, from its approved administrative budget
that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property
Tax Trust Fund, to the county auditor-controller for each six-month fiscal period.
(l) (m) (1) Before each six-month fiscal period, prepare a Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph. For each
recognized obligation, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall identify one
or more of the following sources of payment:
(A) Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(B) Bond proceeds.
(C) Reserve balances.
(D) Administrative cost allowance.
(E) The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, but only to the extent no other
funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by
an enforceable obligation or by the provisions of this part.
3.d
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
11
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(F) Other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset sale proceeds, interest
earnings, and any other revenues derived from the former redevelopment agency, as
approved by the oversight board in accordance with this part.
(2) A Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall not be deemed valid unless all of
the following conditions have been met:
(A) A draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is prepared by the successor
agency for the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agency. by
November 1, 2011. From October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, the The initial draft of that
schedule shall project the dates and amounts of scheduled payments for each
enforceable obligation for the remainder of the time period during which the
redevelopment agency would have been authorized to obligate property tax increment
had such a redevelopment agency not been dissolved, and shall be reviewed and
certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated pursuant to Section
34182.
(B) The certified Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is submitted to and duly
approved by the oversight board.
(C) A copy of the approved Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is submitted to
the county auditor-controller and both the Controller' s office and the Department of
Finance and be posted on the successor agency's Internet Web site.
(3) The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be forward looking to the next
six months. The first Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be submitted to the
Controller's office and the Department of Finance by December 15, 2011 April 15, 2011,
for the period of January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive. This Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall include all payments made by the former
redevelopment agency between January 1, 2012 through January 31, 2012, and shall
include all payments proposed to be made by the successor agency from February 1,
2012 through June 30, 2012. Former redevelopment agency enforceable obligation
payments due, and reasonable or necessary administrative costs due or incurred, prior
to January 1, 2012, shall be made from property tax revenues received in the spring of
2011 property tax distribution, and from other revenues and
balances transferred to the successor agency.
(n) In recognition of the fact that county auditor-controllers were unable to make the
payments required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period
January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 due to the timing of the California Supreme
Court’s ruling in the case California Redevelopment Association et al. v. Matosantos et
al., county auditor-controllers shall do the following:
(A) For the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period July 1, 2012
through December 31, 2012, deduct from the amount that otherwise would be deposited
in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund on behalf of the successor agency an
amount equivalent to the amount that each affected taxing entity was entitled to pursuant
to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period January 1, 2012
through June 30, 2012. The county auditor-controller shall then distribute the deducted
sums to the affected taxing entities in accordance with paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of
Section 34183.
(B) If, after receiving the distribution required pursuant to paragraph (A), an affected
taxing entity has not received the full amount to which it was entitled pursuant to
paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period February 1, 2012
through June 30, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall reapply the provisions of
paragraph (A) on each subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until such
3.d
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
12
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
time as the affected taxing entity has received the full amount to which it was entitled
pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period February 1,
2012 through June 30, 2012.
(o) If the Department of Finance determines pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section
34179 that an obligation proposed to be included on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule covering the period January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 was not an
enforceable obligation or was improperly paid or proposed to be paid from property tax
revenues the county auditor-controller shall deduct from the amount of property tax that
otherwise would be deposited in the Recognized Obligation Retirement Fund on behalf
of the successor agency for the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the
period July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 an amount equivalent to the ineligible
amount that was expended by the former redevelopment agency or the successor
agency between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2012. The deducted sums shall be
distributed to the affected taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of
Section 34183.
If, after applying the calculation required by this subdivision, the county auditor-
controller has not recovered the full amount of property tax increment or property tax that
the Department of Finance determines was expended on ineligible enforceable
obligations by a former redevelopment agency or a successor agency between January
1, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall reapply the provisions of
this subdivision on each subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until
such time as the amount that Finance determines was ineligible for expenditure has
been recovered.
(p) Commencing with the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the
period January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013, successor agencies shall submit an
oversight board-approved Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to Finance and to
the county auditor-controller no fewer than 45 days before the date upon which the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is to take effect.
(1) The successor agency shall submit a copy of the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule to Finance electronically, and the successor agency shall complete the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule in the manner provided for by Finance. A
successor agency shall not be in compliance with this paragraph if it only submits to
Finance an electronic message or a letter stating that the oversight board has approved
a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(2) If a successor agency fails to submit to Finance an oversight board-approved
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule that complies with all requirements of this
subdivision within five business days of the date upon which the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule is to be used to determine the amount of property tax allocations,
Finance may determine if any amount should be withheld by the auditor controller for
payments for enforceable obligations from distribution to taxing agencies, pending
approval of a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. The county auditor-controller
shall distribute the portion of any the sums withheld pursuant to the paragraph to the
affected taxing entities in accordance with paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section
34183 upon notice by the Department of Finance that a portion of the withheld balances
are in excess of the amount of enforceable obligations.
Section 34177.3 is added to read:
3.d
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
13
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
34177.3 (a) Successor agencies have no authority to and shall not create new
enforceable obligations under the authority of the Community Redevelopment Law or in
any way begin new redevelopment work, except in compliance with an enforceable
obligation that existed prior to June 28, 2011.
(b) Successor agencies may create enforceable obligations to conduct the work of
winding down the redevelopment agency including hiring staff, acquiring necessary
professional administrative services and legal counsel, and procuring insurance.
(c) Successor agencies have no authority to and shall not transfer any powers, or
revenues of the successor agency to any other party, public or private, and any such
transfers of authority or revenues are hereby declared to be void and the successor
agency shall take action to reverse any such transfers. The State Controller may audit
any transfer of authority or revenues prohibited by this section and may order the prompt
return of any money or other things of value from the receiving party.
(d) Redevelopment agencies that resolved to participate in the Voluntary Alternative
Redevelopment Program under Chapter 6 of the First Extraordinary Session of 2011
were and are subject to the provisions of Part 1.8. Any actions taken by redevelopment
agencies to create obligations after June 27, 2011 are ultra vires and do not create
enforceable obligations.
(e) The Legislature finds and declares that the provisions of this section are declaratory
of existing law.
Add Section 34177.5 to read:
Section 34177.5. (a) In addition to the powers granted to each successor agency,
and notwithstanding anything in the act adding this part, including, but not limited to,
Sections 34162 and 34189, a successor agency shall have the authority, rights and
powers of the redevelopment agency to which it succeeded solely for the following
purposes:
(1) For the purpose of issuing bonds or incurring other indebtedness to refund the
bonds or other indebtedness of its former redevelopment agency or of the successor
agency to provide savings to the successor agency, provided that (A) the total interest
cost to maturity on the refunding bonds or other indebtedness plus the principal amount
of the refunding bonds or other indebtedness shall not exceed the total remaining
interest cost to maturity on the bonds or other indebtedness to be refunded plus the
remaining principal of the bonds or other indebtedness to be refunded, and (B) the
principal amount of the refunding bonds or other indebtedness shall not exceed the
amount required to defease the refunded bonds or other indebtedness, to establish
customary debt service reserves and to pay related costs of issuance. If the foregoing
conditions are satisfied, the initial principal amount of the refunding bonds or other
indebtedness may be greater than the outstanding principal amount of the bonds or
other indebtedness to be refunded. The successor agency may pledge to such refunding
bonds or other indebtedness the revenues pledged to the bonds or other indebtedness
being refunded, and such pledge, when made in connection with the issuance of such
refunding bonds or other indebtedness, shall have the same lien priority as the pledge
thereof in respect of the bonds or other obligations to be refunded, and shall be valid,
binding and enforceable in accordance with its terms.
(2) For the purpose of issuing bonds or other indebtedness to finance debt service
spikes, including balloon maturities, provided that (A) the existing indebtedness is not
accelerated, except to the extent necessary to achieve substantially level debt service,
3.d
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
14
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
and (B) the principal amount of the bonds or other indebtedness shall not exceed the
amount required to finance the debt service spikes, including establishing customary
debt service reserves and paying related costs of issuance
(3) For the purpose of amending an existing enforceable obligation under which the
successor agency is obligated to reimburse a political subdivision of the state for the
payment of debt service on a bond or other obligation of such political subdivision, or to
pay all or a portion of the debt service on the bond or other obligation of such political
subdivision to provide savings to the successor agency, provided that (A) the
enforceable obligation is amended in connection with a refunding of the bonds or other
obligations of such political subdivision so that the enforceable obligation will apply to the
refunding bonds or other refunding indebtedness of the political subdivision, (B) the total
interest cost to maturity on the refunding bonds or other indebtedness plus the principal
amount of the refunding bonds or other indebtedness shall not exceed the total
remaining interest cost to maturity on the bonds or other indebtedness to be refunded
plus the remaining principal of the bonds or other indebtedness to be refunded, and (C)
the principal amount of the refunding bonds or other indebtedness shall not exceed the
amount required to defease the refunded bonds or other indebtedness, to establish
customary debt service reserves and to pay related costs of issuance. The pledge set
forth in such amended enforceable obligation, when made in connection with the
execution of the amendment of the enforceable obligation, shall have the same lien
priority as the pledge in the enforceable obligation prior to its amendment and shall be
valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with its terms.
(4) For the purpose of issuing bonds or incurring other indebtedness to make payments
under enforceable obligations when such enforceable obligations include the irrevocable
pledge of property tax increment (formerly tax increment revenues prior to the effective
date of this part) or other funds and the obligation to issue bonds secured by such
pledge. The successor agency may pledge to such bonds or other indebtedness the
property tax revenues and other funds described in such enforceable obligation, and
such pledge, when made in connection with the issuance of such bonds or the incurring
of other indebtedness, shall be valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with its
terms. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to authorize a successor agency to
increase the amount of property tax revenues pledged under an enforceable obligation
or to pledge any property tax revenue not already pledged pursuant to an enforceable
obligation. This paragraph does not constitute a change in, but is declaratory of, the
existing law.
(b) The refunding bonds authorized under this Section may be issued under the
authority of Article 11 of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California
Government Code, and the refunding bonds may be sold at public or private sale, or to a
joint powers authority pursuant to the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act.
(c) (1) Prior to incurring any bonds or other indebtedness pursuant to this Section, the
successor agency may subordinate to the bonds or other indebtedness the amount
required to be paid to an affected taxing entity pursuant to Section 34183(a)(1), provided
that the affected taxing entity has approved these subordinations pursuant to this
subdivision.
(2) At the time the successor agency requests an affected taxing entity to subordinate
the amount to be paid to it, the successor agency shall provide the affected taxing entity
with substantial evidence that sufficient funds will be available to pay both the debt
service on the bonds or other indebtedness and the payments required by Section
34183(a)(1), when due.
3.d
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
15
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(3) Within 45 days after receipt of the agency's request, the affected taxing entity shall
approve or disapprove the request for subordination. An affected taxing entity may
disapprove a request for subordination only if it finds, based upon substantial evidence,
that the successor agency will not be able to pay the debt service payments and the
amount required to be paid to the affected taxing entity. If the affected taxing entity does
not act within 45 days after receipt of the agency's request, the request to subordinate
shall be deemed approved and shall be final and conclusive.
(d) An action may be brought pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 860) of
Title 10 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine the validity of bonds or
other obligations authorized by this Section, the pledge of revenues to such bonds or
other obligations authorized by this Section, the legality and validity of all proceedings
theretofore taken and (as provided in the resolution of the legislative body of the
successor agency authorizing the bonds or other obligations authorized by this Section)
proposed to be taken for the authorization, execution, issuance, sale, and delivery of the
bonds or other obligations authorized by this Section, and for the payment of debt
service on such bonds or the payment of amounts under such other obligations
authorized by this Section. The provisions of Section 33501(c) shall not apply to any
such action. The Department of Finance shall be noticed of the filing of any such action
as an affected party.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including but not limited to Section
33501, an action to challenge the issuance of bonds, the incurrence of indebtedness, the
amendment of an enforceable obligation or the execution of a financing agreement by a
successor agency must be brought within 30 days after the date on which the oversight
board approves the resolution of the successor agency approving the issuance of bonds,
the incurrence of indebtedness, the amendment of an enforceable obligation or the
execution of a financing agreement authorized under this Section 34177.5.
(f) The actions authorized in this Section shall be subject to the approval of the
oversight board, as provided in Section 34180. Additionally, an oversight board may
direct the successor agency to commence any of the transactions described in (a) so
long as the successor agency will be able to recover its related costs in connection with
the transaction. After a successor agency, with approval of the oversight board, issues
any bonds, incurs any indebtedness or executes an amended enforceable obligation
pursuant to subsection (a), the oversight board may not unilaterally approve any
amendments to or early termination of the bonds, indebtedness or enforceable
obligation. If, under the authority granted to it by subdivision (h) of Section 34179, the
Department of Finance either reviews and approves or fails to request review within five
business days of an oversight board approval of an action authorized by this Section,
then the scheduled payments on the bonds or other indebtedness shall be listed in the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and will not be subject to further review and
approval by the Department of Finance or the Controller.
(g) Any bonds, indebtedness or amended enforceable obligation authorized by this
Section shall be considered indebtedness incurred by the dissolved redevelopment
agency, with the same legal effect as if such bonds, indebtedness, financing agreement
or amended enforceable obligation had been issued, incurred or entered into prior to
June 29, 2011 in full conformity with the applicable provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law that existed prior to such date, shall be included in the successor
agency’s Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, and shall be secured by a pledge
of and lien on and shall be repaid from moneys deposited from time to time in the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established pursuant to Section 34172(c), as
3.d
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
16
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
provided in Section 34183(a)(2). Property tax revenues pledged to any bonds,
indebtedness or amended enforceable obligation authorized by this Section are taxes
allocated to the successor agency pursuant to Section 33670(b) and 16 of Article XVI of
the Constitution.
(h) The successor agency shall make diligent efforts to ensure the lowest long-term cost
financing is obtained. The financing shall not provide for any bullets or spikes and shall
not use variable rates. The successor agency shall make use of an independent
financial advisor in developing such financing proposals and shall make the work
products of the financial advisor available to the Department of Finance at its request.
Health and Safety Code Section 34178 is amended as follows:
34178. (a) Commencing on the operative date of this part, agreements, contracts, or
arrangements between the city or county, or city and county that created the
redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency are invalid and shall not be
binding on the successor agency; provided, however, that a successor entity wishing
to enter or reenter into agreements with the city, county, or city and county that formed
the redevelopment agency that it is succeeding may do so upon obtaining the approval
of its oversight board. In no event, however, shall a successor agency or an oversight
board exercise the powers granted by this subdivision to restore funding for an
enforceable obligation that was deleted or reduced by the Department of Finance
pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 34179.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), any of the following agreements are not invalid
and may bind the successor agency:
(1) A duly authorized written agreement entered into at the time of issuance, but in no
event later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and solely for the
purpose of securing or repaying those indebtedness obligations.
(2) A written agreement between a redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city
and county that created it that provided loans or other startup funds for the
redevelopment agency that were entered into within two years of the formation of the
redevelopment agency.
(3) A joint exercise of powers agreement in which the redevelopment agency is a
member of the joint powers authority. However, upon assignment to the successor
agency by operation of the act adding this part, the successor agency's rights, duties,
and performance obligations under that joint exercise of powers agreement shall be
limited by the constraints imposed on successor agencies by the act adding this part.
Health and Safety Code Section 34179 is amended as follows:
34179. (a) Each successor agency shall have an oversight board composed of seven
members. The members shall elect one of their members as the chairperson and shall
report the name of the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance on
or before January 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1) One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2) One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed the redevelopment
agency.
(3) One member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with
territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the
type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to
3.d
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
17
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
Section 34188. For purposes of this paragraph, property tax share means the sum of
the property tax revenue allocated to the special district as required by paragraph (1) of
subdivision (a) of Revenue and Taxation Code section 96.1, and subdivision (e) of
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 96.5, from within each tax rate area of the former
redevelopment agency. Property tax share shall not include property tax revenues
received by a special district for purposes of retiring debt issued by the special district.
Property tax share shall be calculated net of any property tax revenues remitted by the
special district to the county Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund.
(4) One member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent
schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is
appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the
county board of education.
(5) One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to
represent community college districts in the county.
(6) One member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7) One member representing the employees of the former redevelopment agency
appointed by the mayor or chair of the board of supervisors, as the case may be, from
the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of former
redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time. In
voting to approve a contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed
pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract by virtue
of being an employee of the successor agency or community for purposes of Section
1090 of the Government Code.
(8) If the county or a joint powers agency formed the redevelopment agency, then the
largest city by acreage in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency
may select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project area of the
redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of education may appoint an
additional member to represent the public.
(9) If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible to receive property tax
pursuant to Section 34188, within the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment
agency, then the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
(10) Where a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity that is both a charter city
and a county, the oversight board shall be composed of seven members selected as
follows: three members appointed by the mayor of the city, where such appointment is
subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one member appointed by
the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction
of the former redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is eligible to
receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188, one member appointed by the
county superintendent of education to represent schools, one member appointed by the
Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college
districts, and one member representing employees of the former redevelopment agency
appointed by the mayor of the city where such an appointment is subject to confirmation
by the county board of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former
redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time.
3.d
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
18
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(b) The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position
described in subdivision (a) that has not been filled by January 15, 2012, or any member
position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(c) The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor agency to perform work in
furtherance of the oversight board's duties and responsibilities under this part. The
successor agency shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board and
may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight board members shall
serve without compensation or reimbursement for expenses.
(d) Oversight board members shall have personal immunity from suit for their actions
taken within the scope of their responsibilities as oversight board members.
(e) A majority of the total membership of the oversight board shall constitute a quorum
for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the total membership of the oversight
board is required for the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be
deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public
Records Act, and the Political Reform Act of 1974.
(f) All notices required by law for proposed oversight board actions shall also be
posted on the successor agency's Internet Web site or the oversight board's Internet
Web site.
(g) Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the pleasure of the entity that
appointed such member.
h) The Department of Finance may review an oversight board action
taken pursuant to the act adding this part. As such, all oversight board actions shall not
be effective for three business days, pending a request for review by the department.
Notice and information about all actions taken by an oversight board shall be provided to
the Department of Finance by electronic means and in a manner of its choosing. No
action shall be effective until five business days after notice and sufficient information is
provided to the department to determine if it will request a review of an action. Each
oversight board shall designate an official to whom the department may make such
requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone number and e-mail
contact information for the purpose of communicating with the department pursuant to
this subdivision. In the event that the department requests a review of a given oversight
board action, it shall have 10 20 days from the date of its request to approve the
oversight board action, request additional information, or return it to the oversight board
for reconsideration and such oversight board action shall not be effective until approved
by the department. In the event that the department returns the oversight board action to
the oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall resubmit the modified
action for department approval and the modified oversight board action shall not become
effective until approved by the department. No later than five business days prior to the
date for each allocation of funds to successor agencies by the county auditor controller,
the Department may eliminate or modify any item on a Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule prior to approving it for purposes of determining the amount of property tax to
allocate to successor agencies and affected taxing entities. The auditor-controller shall
reflect the actions of the department in determining the amount of property tax to
allocate to the successor agency. The department shall provide notice to the successor
agency and the auditor-controller as to the reasons for its actions. To the extent that an
oversight board continues to dispute a determination with the department, one or more
future recognized obligation schedules may reflect any resolution of that dispute.
(i) Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable
obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other
3.d
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
19
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
revenues pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4 (commencing
with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall apply to oversight boards.
Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the Government Code, or any other law, any individual
may simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and may hold an office
in a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, or community college
district.
(j) Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where more than one
oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, there shall be only
one oversight board appointed as follows:
(1) One member may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2) One member may be appointed by the city selection committee established
pursuant to Section 50270 of the Government Code. In the city and county, the mayor
may appoint one member.
(3) One member may be appointed by the independent special district selection
committee established pursuant to Section 56332 of the Government Code, for the types
of special districts that are eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section
34188.
(4) One member may be appointed by the county superintendent of education to
represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of
education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be
made by the county board of education.
(5) One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community
Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6) One member of the public may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7) One member may be appointed by the recognized employee organization
representing the largest number of successor agency employees in the county.
(k) The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position
described in subdivision (j) that has not been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member
position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(l) Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where only one oversight
board was created by operation of the act adding this part, then there will be no change
to the composition of that oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m) Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall cease to exist when all of
the indebtedness of the dissolved redevelopment agency has been repaid.
(n) An oversight board is not a separate public entity, but is a second governing body
and act through the successor agency. An oversight board may not be named in a
lawsuit, and any suits must be directed at the successor agency. An oversight board
may direct a successor agency to provide additional or different legal or financial advice
than given by agency staff.
(o) An oversight board is authorized to contract with the county or other public or private
agencies for administrative support.
(p) On matters within the purview of the oversight board, decisions made by the
oversight board supersede those made by successor agency board or the staff of the
successor agency. Oversight board decisions supersede the direction of the city, county
or city and county governing board with respect to successor agency matters, including
direction of city employees conducting business on behalf of the successor agency.
Section 34179.5 is added to the Health and Safety Code to read:
3.d
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
20
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
34179.5 (a) In furtherance of subdivision (e) of Section 34177, each successor agency
shall employ a licensed accountant to conduct a due diligence review to determine the
unobligated balances available for transfer to taxing entities.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision the following terms shall have the following
meanings:
(1) “Cash” and “cash equivalents” includes but is not necessarily limited to cash in hand,
bank deposits, Local Agency Investment Fund deposits, deposits in the city or county
treasury or any other pool, marketable securities, commercial paper, United States
Treasury bills, banker’s acceptances, payables on demand and amounts due from other
parties as defined in subdivision (c) and any other money owned by the successor
agency.
(2) “Enforceable obligation” includes any of the items listed in subdivision (d) of Section
34171, contracts detailing specific work to be performed that were entered into by the
former redevelopment agency prior to June 28, 2011 with a third party that is other than
the city, county, or city and county that created the former redevelopment agency, and
indebtedness obligations as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 34171,
(3) “Transferred” means the transmission of money to another party for where it is not in
payment for goods or services or an investment or where the payment is de minimus.
Transfer also means where the payments are ultimately merely a restriction on the use
of the money.
(c) At a minimum the review required by this subdivision shall include the following:
(1) The dollar value assets transferred from the former redevelopment agency to the
successor agency on or about February 1, 2012.
(2) The dollar value of assets and cash and cash equivalents transferred after January 1,
2011 through June 30, 2012 by the redevelopment agency or the successor agency to
the city, county or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency and the
purpose of each transfer. The review shall provide documentation of any enforceable
obligation that required the transfer.
(3) The dollar value of any cash or cash equivalents transferred after January 1, 2011
through June 30, 2012 by the redevelopment agency or the successor agency to any
other public agency or private party and the purpose of each transfer. The review shall
provide documentation of any enforceable obligation that required the transfer.
(4) The review shall provide expenditure and revenue accounting information for the
2011-12 fiscal year that account for changes in balances from those reported to the
State Controller for fiscal year 2010-11.
(5) A separate accounting for the balance for the low and moderate income housing fund
for all other funds and accounts combined shall be made as follows:
(A) A statement of the total value of the account as of June 30, 2012.
(B) An itemized statement listing any amounts that are legally restricted as to purpose
and cannot be provided to taxing agencies. This could include the proceeds of any
bonds, grant funds, or funds provided by other governmental entities that place
conditions on their use.
(C) An itemized statement of the values of any assets that are not cash or cash
equivalents. This could include physical assets, land, records and equipment. For
purpose of this accounting, physical assets may be valued at purchase cost or at any
recently estimated market value.
(D) An itemized listing of each enforceable obligation that requires the retention of any
current balances, the amount of such obligation and an explanation of why future
revenues are not able to satisfy that obligation. If a review finds that insufficient future
3.d
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
21
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
revenues are available to fund future obligations and thus retention of current balances
is required it shall detail the projected property tax revenues and other general purpose
revenues to be received by the successor agency, together with both the amount and
the timing of the bond debt service payments of the successor agency, for the period in
which the oversight board anticipates the successor agency will have insufficient
property tax revenue to pay the specified obligations.
(E) An itemized list and analysis of any amounts of current balances at that are needed
to satisfy obligations that will be placed on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedules for the current fiscal year.
(6) The review shall total the net balances available after deducting the total amounts
described in subparagraphs (B) through (E) of paragraph (5). The review shall add any
amounts that were transferred as identified in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c)
where no enforceable obligation to make such transfer existed. The resulting sum shall
be available for allocation to affected taxing entities pursuant to Section 34179.6. It shall
be a rebuttal presumption that cash and cash equivalent balances available to the
successor agency are available and sufficient to disburse the amount determined in this
paragraph to taxing agencies. If the review finds that there are insufficient cash
balances to transfer or that cash or cash equivalents are specifically obligated to the
purposes described in subparagraphs (B) (D) and (E) of paragraph (5) in such amounts
that there is insufficient cash to provide the full amount determined pursuant to this
paragraph, that amount shall be demonstrated in an additional itemized schedule.
34179.6 The review required pursuant to Section 34179.5 shall be submitted to the
oversight board for review.
(a) By October 1, 2012, each successor agency shall provide to the oversight board,
the county auditor-controller, the State Controller, and to the Department of Finance the
results of the review conducted pursuant to Section 34179.5 for the low and moderate
income housing fund and specifically the amount of cash and cash equivalents
determined to be available to allocate to taxing entities. By December 15, 2013, each
successor agency shall provide to the oversight board, the county auditor-controller, the
State Controller, and to the Department of Finance the results of the review conducted
pursuant to Section 34179.5 for the all of the other fund and account balances and
specifically the amount of cash and cash equivalents determined to be available to
allocate to taxing entities. Department of Finance may request any supporting
documentation and review results to assist in its review under subdivision(d).
(b) Upon receipt of the review, the oversight board shall convene a public comment
session to take place at least five business days before the oversight board holds the
approval vote specified in subdivision (c). The oversight board also shall consider any
opinions offered by the county auditor-controller on the review results submitted by the
successor agencies.
(c) By October 15, 2012 for the low and moderate income housing fund and by
January 15, 2013 for all other funds and accounts, the oversight board shall review,
approve, and transmit to Department of Finance and the county auditor-controller the
determination of the amount of cash and cash equivalents that are available for
disbursement to taxing entities as determined according to the method provided in
Section 34179.5. The oversight board may adjust any amount provided in the review to
reflect additional information and analysis. The review and approval shall occur in public
sessions. The oversight board may request from the successor agency any materials it
3.d
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
22
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
deems necessary to assist in its review and approval of the determination. The
oversight board shall be empowered to authorize a successor agency to retain assets or
funds identified in subparagraphs (B) through (E) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of
section 34179.5. An oversight board that makes such an authorization also shall identify
to Finance the amount of funds authorized for retention, the source of those funds, and
the purposes for which those funds are being retained. The determination and
authorizations to retain funds and assets shall be subject to the review and approval of
the Department of Finance pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) Department of Finance may adjust any amount associated with the determination
based on its analysis and information provided by the successor agency and others.
The Department of Finance shall consider any findings or opinions of the county auditor-
controllers and the Controller. Department of Finance shall complete its review of the
determinations provided pursuant to subdivision (c) no later than November 10, 2012 for
the low and moderate income fund and also shall notify the oversight board and the
successor agency of its decision to overturn any oversight board authorizations made
pursuant to subdivision (c). Department of Finance shall complete its review of the
determinations provided pursuant to subdivision (c) no later than April 1, 2013 for the
other funds and accounts and also shall notify the oversight board and the successor
agency of its decision to overturn any oversight board authorizations made pursuant to
subdivision (c). Each successor agency shall transmit the amount of funds required
pursuant to the determination of the Department within five working days of receipt of the
notification. Successor agencies shall make diligent efforts to recover any money
determined to have been transferred without an enforceable obligation as described in
paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5. If the successor agency
cannot promptly recover such funds, the remedies provided in subdivision (g) or
paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34177may be used. The Department of
Finance, the county auditor-controller and the Controller shallcoordinate their actions
under these provisions. The department shall notify auditor controllers of its actions and
the auditor-controllers will disburse the funds to taxing agencies within five working days
of receipt. Amounts received after November 28 and April 10 may be held and
disbursed with the regular payments to taxing agencies pursuant to Section 34183.
(e) By December 1, 2012 the county auditor-controller shall provide Finance a report
specifying the amount submitted by each successor agency pursuant to subdivision (f)
for low and moderate income housing funds, and specifically noting those successor
agencies that failed to remit the full required amount. By April 20, 2013, the county
auditor-controller shall provide Finance a report detailing the amount submitted by each
successor agency pursuant to subdivision (f) for all other funds and accounts, and
specifically noting those successor agencies that failed to remit the full required amount.
(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of the amount provided to a school
district or a community college pursuant to this subdivision, only 95 percent shall be
considered to be property taxes for the purposes of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of
Section 42238 of the Education Code. The auditor-controller shall report both amounts
provided to school districts and community colleges to the State Department of
Education.
(g) If a successor agency fails to remit to the county auditor-controller the sums
identified in subdivision (e) by the deadlines specified therein the following remedies are
available:
(1) When the city, county, or city and county that created the former redevelopment
agency is also the successor agency, Department of Finance may order an offset to the
3.d
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
23
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
distribution provided to the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 7204. This offset shall be equal to the amount the city, county,
or city and county fails to remit pursuant to subdivision (e). The offset shall be
effectuated by the Board of Equalization in an amount specified by Finance. Sums
offset for purposes of subdivision (e) shall be provided by the Board of Equalization to
the county auditor-controller each month until the full offset is reached. The county
auditor-controller shall disburse sums received pursuant to this subdivision to the
affected taxing entities in accordance with paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section
34183 and subdivision( d). If a successor agency makes all or part of the remittance
required by subdivision (d), but that remittance is made after the deadline, as applicable,
the successor agency shall notify Finance that the remittance was made. Upon
confirming this fact with the county auditor-controller, Finance shall notify the Board of
Equalization to resume providing the city, county, or city and county with the full
distribution authorized pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7204.
(2) Alternately or in addition to the remedy provided in paragraph (1), Department of
Finance may direct the county-auditor controller to deduct the unpaid amount from future
allocations of property tax to the successor agency under Section 34183 until the
amount of payment required pursuant to subdivision (d) is accomplished.
(3) If Department of Finance determines that payment the full amount required under
subdivision (d) is not currently feasible or would jeopardize the ability of the successor
agency to pay enforceable obligations in a timely manner, it may agree to an installment
payment plan.
Section 34180 is amended to read:
34180. All of the following successor agency actions shall first be approved by the
oversight board:
(a) The establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding loans where the terms
have not been specified prior to the date of this part.
(b) Refunding of outstanding bonds or other debt of the former redevelopment agency by
successor agencies in order to provide for savings or to finance debt service spikes;
provided, however, that no additional debt is created and debt service is not accelerated.
The issuance of bonds or other indebtedness or the pledge or agreement for the pledge
of property tax revenues (formerly tax increment prior to the effective date of this part)
pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34177.5.
(c) Setting aside of amounts in reserves as required by indentures, trust indentures, or
similar documents governing the issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(d) Merging of project areas.
(e) Continuing the acceptance of federal or state grants, or other forms of financial
assistance from either public or private sources, where assistance is conditioned upon
the provision of matching funds, by the successor entity as successor to the former
redevelopment agency, in an amount greater than 5 percent.
(f) (1) If a city, county, or city and county wishes to retain any properties or other assets
for future redevelopment activities, funded from its own funds and under its own
auspices, it must reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to
provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base property tax, as
determined pursuant to Section 34188, for the value of the property retained.
3.d
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
24
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(2) If no other agreement is reached on valuation of the retained assets, the value will be
the fair market value as of the 2011 property tax lien date as determined by the county
assessor.
(g) Establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h) A request by the successor agency to enter into an agreement with the city, county,
or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency that it is succeeding.
(i) A request by a successor agency or taxing entity to pledge, or to enter into an
agreement for the pledge of, property tax revenues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
34178.
34181. The oversight board shall direct the successor agency to do all of the following:
(a) Dispose of all assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency that were
funded by tax increment revenues of the dissolved redevelopment agency; provided,
however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer
ownership of those assets that were constructed and used for a governmental purpose,
such as roads, school buildings, parks, and police and fire stations, to the appropriate
public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements relating to the construction or use
of such an asset. Any compensation to be provided to the successor agency for the
transfer of the asset shall be governed by the agreements relating to the construction or
use of that asset. Disposal shall be done expeditiously and in a manner aimed at
maximizing value. Asset disposition may be accomplished by a distribution of income to
taxing agencies proportionate to their property tax share from one or more properties
that may be transferred to a public or private agency for management pursuant to the
direction of the oversight board disposition resolution.
(b) Cease performance in connection with and terminate all existing agreements that do
not qualify as enforceable obligations.
(c) Transfer housing responsibilities and all rights, powers, duties, and obligations along
with any amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to the
appropriate entity assets pursuant to Section 34176.
(d) Terminate any agreement, between the dissolved redevelopment agency and any
public entity located in the same county, obligating the redevelopment agency to provide
funding for any debt service obligations of the public entity or for the construction, or
operation of facilities owned or operated by such public entity, in any instance where the
oversight board has found that early termination would be in the best interests of the
taxing entities.
(e) Determine whether any contracts, agreements, or other arrangements between the
dissolved redevelopment agency and any private parties should be terminated or
renegotiated to reduce liabilities and increase net revenues to the taxing entities, and
present proposed termination or amendment agreements to the oversight board for its
approval. The board may approve any amendments to or early termination of such
agreements where it finds that amendments or early termination would be in the best
interests of the taxing entities.
(f) All actions taken pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (c) must be approved by resolution
of the oversight board at a public meeting after at least 10 days notice to the public of
the specific proposed actions. Such actions shall be subject to review by the Department
of Finance pursuant to Section 34179 except that the department may extend it review
period by up to 60 days. If the Department does not object to action subject to this
3.d
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
25
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
section, the action of the oversight board shall be considered final and can be relied
upon as conclusive by any person if no action challenging an action is commenced
within 60 days of the approval of the action by the oversight board. If an action is brought
to challenge an action involving title to or an interest in real property, a notice of
pendency of action shall be recorded by the claimant as provided in section 405, et seq.
of the Code of Civil Procedure within such 60 day period.
Health and Safety Code Section 34182 is amended as follows:
34182. (a) (1) The county auditor-controller shall conduct or cause to be conducted an
agreed-upon procedures audit of each redevelopment agency in the county that is
subject to this part, to be completed by March October 1, 2012.
(2) The purpose of the audits shall be to establish each redevelopment agency's
assets and liabilities, to document and determine each redevelopment agency's
passthrough payment obligations to other taxing agencies, and to document and
determine both the amount and the terms of any indebtedness incurred by the
redevelopment agency and certify pursuant to the initial Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule.
(3) The county auditor-controller may charge the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust
Fund for any costs incurred by the county auditor-controller pursuant to this part.
(b) By March October 15, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall provide the
Controller's office a copy of all audits performed pursuant to this section. The county
auditor-controller shall maintain a copy of all documentation and working papers for use
by the Controller.
(c) (1) The county auditor-controller shall determine the amount of property taxes that
would have been allocated to each redevelopment agency in the county had the
redevelopment agency not been dissolved pursuant to the operation of the act adding
this part. These amounts are deemed property tax revenues within the meaning of
subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution and are
available for allocation and distribution in accordance with the provisions of the act
adding this part. The county auditor-controller shall calculate the property tax revenues
using current assessed values on the last equalized roll on August 20, pursuant to
Section 2052 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and pursuant to statutory formulas or
contractual agreements with other taxing agencies, as of the effective date of this
section, and shall deposit that amount in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund.
(2) Each county auditor-controller shall administer the Redevelopment Property Tax
Trust Fund for the benefit of the holders of former redevelopment agency enforceable
obligations and the taxing entities that receive passthrough payments and distributions
of property taxes pursuant to this part.
(3) In connection with the allocation and distribution by the county auditor-controller of
property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, in
compliance with this part, the county auditor-controller shall prepare estimates of
amounts to be allocated and distributed, and provide those estimates to both the entities
receiving the distributions and the Department of Finance, no later than November 1 and
May 1 of each year.
(4) Each county auditor-controller shall disburse proceeds of asset sales or reserve
balances, which have been received from the successor entities pursuant to Sections
34177 and 34187, to the taxing entities. In making such a distribution, the county
3.d
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
26
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
auditor-controller shall utilize the same methodology for allocation and distribution of
property tax revenues provided in Section 34188.
(d) By October 1, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall report the following
information to the Controller's office and the Director of Finance:
(1) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to the Redevelopment Property Tax
Trust Fund related to each former redevelopment agency.
(2) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to each agency under paragraph (1) of
subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(3) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to each successor agency pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(4) The sums of property tax revenues paid to each successor agency pursuant to
paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(5) The sums paid to each city, county, and special district, and the total amount
allocated for schools pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(6) Any amounts deducted from other distributions pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 34183.
(e) A county auditor-controller may charge the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust
Fund for the costs of administering the provisions of this part.
(f) The Controller may audit and review any county auditor-controller action taken
pursuant to the act adding this part. As such, all county auditor-controller actions shall
not be effective for three business days, pending a request for review by the Controller.
In the event that the Controller requests a review of a given county auditor-controller
action, he or she shall have 10 days from the date of his or her request to approve the
county auditor-controller's action or return it to the county auditor-controller for
reconsideration and such county auditor-controller action shall not be effective until
approved by the Controller. In the event that the Controller returns the county auditor-
controller's action to the county auditor-controller for reconsideration, the county auditor-
controller must resubmit the modified action for Controller approval and such modified
county auditor-controller action shall not become effective until approved by the
Controller.
Section 34182.5 is added to read:
34182.5 An auditor-controller may review Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules
and object to the inclusion of any items that are not demonstrated to be enforceable
obligations and may object to the funding source proposed for any items. The auditor-
controller shall promptly transmit notice of any such objections to the successor agency
and Department of Finance. Notice must be given at least 15 days prior to an allocation
date specified in section 34183. If an oversight board disputes the finding of the auditor-
controller, it may refer the matter to the Department of Finance for a determination of
what will be approved for inclusion in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
Section 34183 is amended to read:
34183. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, from October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, and for
each fiscal year thereafter, the county auditor-controller shall, after deducting
administrative costs allowed under Section 34182 and Section 95.3 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, allocate moneys in each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund as
follows:
3.d
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
27
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
(1) Subject to any prior deductions required by subdivision (b), first, the county auditor-
controller shall remit from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to each local
agency and school entity an amount of property tax revenues in an amount equal to that
which would have been received under Section 33401, 33492.140, 33607, 33607.5,
33607.7, or 33676, as those sections read on January 1, 2011, or pursuant to any
passthrough agreement between a redevelopment agency and a taxing jurisdiction that
was entered into prior to January 1, 1994, that would be in force during that fiscal year,
had the redevelopment agency existed at that time. The amount of the payments made
pursuant to this paragraph shall be calculated solely on the basis of passthrough
payment obligations, existing prior to the effective date of this part and continuing as
obligations of successor entities, shall occur no later than January 16, 2012, and no later
than June 1, 2012, and each January 16 and June 1 thereafter. Notwithstanding
subdivision (e) of Section 33670, that portion of the taxes in excess of the amount
identified in subdivision (a) of Section 33670, which are attributable to a tax rate levied
by a taxing agency for the purpose of producing revenues in an amount sufficient to
make annual repayments of the principal of, and the interest on, any bonded
indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property shall be allocated to,
and when collected shall be paid into, the fund of that taxing agency. The amount of
pass through payments computed pursuant to this section shall be computed as though
the requirement to set aside funds for the low and moderate income housing fund was
still in effect.
(2) Second, on January 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each January 16 and June 1
thereafter, to each successor agency for payments listed in its Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule for the six-month fiscal period beginning January 1, 2012, or July 1,
2012, and each January 16 and June 1 thereafter, in the following order of priority:
(A) Debt service payments scheduled to be made for tax allocation bonds.
(B) Payments scheduled to be made on revenue bonds, but only to the extent the
revenues pledged for them are insufficient to make the payments and only where the
agency’s tax increment revenues were also pledged for the repayment of the bonds.
(C) Payments scheduled for other debts and obligations listed in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule that are required to be paid from former tax increment
revenue.
(3) Third, on January 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each January 16 and June 1
thereafter, to each successor agency for the administrative cost allowance, as defined in
Section 34171, for administrative costs set forth in an approved administrative budget for
those payments required to be paid from former tax increment revenues.
(4) Fourth, on January 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each January 16 and June 1
thereafter, any moneys remaining in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund after
the payments and transfers authorized by paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, shall be
distributed to local agencies and school entities in accordance with Section 34188.
(b) If the successor agency reports, no later than December 1, 2011, and May 1, 2012,
and each December 1 and May 1 thereafter, to the county auditor-controller that the total
amount available to the successor agency from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust
Fund allocation to that successor agency’s Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund,
from other funds transferred from each redevelopment agency, and from funds that have
or will become available through asset sales and all redevelopment operations, are
insufficient to fund the payments required by paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of
subdivision (a) in the next six-month fiscal period, the county auditor-controller shall
notify the Controller and the Department of Finance no later than 10 days from the date
3.d
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
28
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
of that notification. The county auditor-controller shall verify whether the successor
agency will have sufficient funds from which to service debts according to the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and shall report the findings to the Controller.
If the Controller concurs that there are insufficient funds to pay required debt service, the
amount of the deficiency shall be deducted first from the amount remaining to be
distributed to taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4), and if that amount is exhausted,
from amounts available for distribution for administrative costs in paragraph (3). If an
agency, pursuant to the provisions of Section 33492.15, 33492.72, 33607.5, 33671.5,
33681.15, or 33688, made passthrough payment obligations subordinate to debt service
payments required for enforceable obligations, funds for servicing bond debt may be
deducted from the amounts for passthrough payments under paragraph (1), as provided
in those sections, but only to the extent that the amounts remaining to be distributed to
taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) and the amounts available for distribution for
administrative costs in paragraph (3) have all been exhausted.
(c) The county treasurer may loan any funds from the county treasury that are necessary
to ensure prompt payments of redevelopment agency debts.
(d) The Controller may recover the costs of audit and oversight required under this part
from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund by presenting an invoice therefor to
the county auditor-controller who shall set aside sufficient funds for and disburse the
claimed amounts prior to making the next distributions to the taxing jurisdictions
pursuant to Section 34188. Subject to the approval of the Director of Finance, the budget
of the Controller may be augmented to reflect the reimbursement, pursuant to Section
28.00 of the Budget Act.
Health and Safety Code Section 34185 is amended as follows:
34185. Commencing on January 16, 2012, and on each January 16 2 and June 1
thereafter, the county auditor-controller shall transfer, from the Redevelopment Property
Tax Trust Fund of each successor agency into the Redevelopment Obligation
Retirement Fund of that agency, an amount of property tax revenues equal to that
specified in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for that successor agency
as payable from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund subject to the limitations of
Sections 34173 34177 (l) and 34183.
Health and Safety Code Section 34187 is amended as follows:
34187. (a) Commencing January 1, 2012, whenever a recognized obligation that had
been identified in the Recognized Payment Obligation Schedule is paid off or retired,
either through early payment or payment at maturity, the county auditor-controller shall
distribute to the taxing entities, in accordance with the provisions of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, all property tax revenues that were associated with the payment of the
recognized obligation.
(1) Notwithstanding this provision, the Department of Finance may authorize a
successor agency to retain property tax that otherwise would be distributed to affected
taxing entities pursuant to this subdivision, to the extent the Department determines the
successor agency requires those funds for the payment of enforceable obligations.
Upon making such a determination, the Department shall provide the county auditor-
controller with information detailing the amounts that it has authorized the successor
agency to retain. Upon determining the successor agency no longer requires additional
3.d
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
29
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
funds pursuant to this subdivision, the Department shall notify the successor agency and
the county auditor-controller. The county auditor-controller shall then distribute the funds
in question to the affected taxing entities in accordance with the provisions of the
Revenue and Taxation Code.
Sections 34189.1 and 34189.2 added to Chapter 6 to read:
34189.1 No party, public or private, may pursue, nor does a court have jurisdiction on a
validation action with respect to any action of a redevelopment agency or a successor
agency to a redevelopment agency that took place on or after January 1, 2011, unless
the Department of Finance, representing interests of the State of California and each of
the taxing agencies who could be affected financially by the action have been properly
noticed.
34189.2 A successor agency or any party to an enforceable obligation as defined under
this part shall have the right to request that the state consent to a validation action with
respect to any enforceable obligation, or matter of title to an asset that belonged to a
redevelopment agency. For such an action to be properly filed, both the state Controller
and the Director of Finance must be noticed and both must consent to the validation.
Such actions must be filed in the County of Sacramento.
Section 53760.1 of the Government Code is amended to read:
53760.1. As used in this article the following terms have the following
meanings:
(a) “Chapter 9” means Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 901) of
Title 11 of the United States Code.
(b) “Creditor” means either of the following:
(1) An entity that has a noncontingent claim against a municipality that arose at the time
of or before the commencement of the neutral evaluation process and whose claim
represents at least five million dollars ($5,000,000) or comprises more than 5 percent of
the local public entity’s debt or obligations, whichever is less.
(2) An entity that would have a noncontingent claim against the municipality upon the
rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease in a Chapter 9 case and whose
claim would represent at least five million dollars ($5,000,000) or comprises more than 5
percent of the local public entity’s debt or obligations, whichever is less.
(c) “Debtor” means a local public entity that may file for bankruptcy under Chapter 9.
(d) “Good faith” means participation by a party in the neutral evaluation process with the
intent to negotiate toward a resolution of the issues that are the subject of the neutral
evaluation process, including the timely provision of complete and accurate information
to provide the relevant parties through the neutral evaluation process with sufficient
information, in a confidential manner, to negotiate the readjustment of the municipality’s
debt.
(e) “Interested party” means a trustee, a committee of creditors, an affected creditor, an
indenture trustee, a pension fund, a bondholder, a union that, under its collective
bargaining agreements, has standing to initiate contract or debt restructuring
negotiations with the municipality, or a representative selected by an association of
retired employees of the public entity who receive income from the public entity
convening the neutral evaluation. A local public entity may invite holders of contingent
3.d
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
30
V:\Language\[200-299] BTH\[210] ABx1 26 Redevelopment Clean-Up and RDA Asset Disposition.docx, 5/14/2012
4:37:08 PM
claims to participate as interested parties in the neutral evaluation if the local public
entity determines that the contingency is likely to occur and the claim may represent five
million dollars ($5,000,000) or comprise more than 5 percent of the local public entity’s
debt or obligations, whichever is less.
(f) “Local public entity” means any county, city, district, public authority, public agency, or
other entity, without limitation, that is a municipality as defined in Section 101(40) of Title
11 of the United States Code (bankruptcy), or that qualifies as a debtor under any other
federal bankruptcy law applicable to local public entities. For purposes of this article,
“local public entity” does not include a school district. For purposes of this article, “local
public entity” includes a successor agency to a redevelopment agency created pursuant
to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g) “Local public entity representative” means the person or persons designated by the
local public agency with authority to make recommendations and to attend the neutral
evaluation on behalf of the governing body of the municipality.
(h) “Neutral evaluation” is a form of alternative dispute resolution that may be known as
mandatory mediation. A “neutral evaluator” may also be known as a mediator.
There is hereby appropriated up to fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) from the General
Fund, for allocation to departments by the Director of Finance in furtherance of the
objectives of this act. An allocation of funds approved by the Director of Finance under
this item shall become effective no sooner than 30 days after the director files written
notification thereof with the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and
the chairpersons of the fiscal committees in each house of the Legislature, or no sooner
than any lesser time the chairperson of the joint committee, or his or her designee, may
in each instance determine.
3.d
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
[
2
1
0
]
A
B
x
1
2
6
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
l
e
a
n
-
U
p
a
n
d
R
D
A
A
s
s
e
t
D
i
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
3.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
5
0
Attachment: DOF Letter of May 11_2012 on ROPS2 (1056 : Preliminary FY 2012-13 Budget)
3.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
5
1
Attachment: DOF Letter of May 11_2012 on ROPS2 (1056 : Preliminary FY 2012-13 Budget)
5/14/2012
City of Grand Terrace
Fund: 09 CHILD CARE FUND FUND PRELIM
BUDGET
Infant
Kangaroo
Tiny Tot After
School
Pre-
School
Other
SUBS
Admin.
2013
Revenue:
09-440-21 TINY TOT PROGRAM 61,220 61,220 0 0 0 0
09-440-23 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM G/T & T/V 276,493 0 276,493 0 0 0
09-440-28 PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAM 628,684 146,093 0 0 482,591 0 0
09-440-xx Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fund: 09 Total Revenue:966,397 146,093 61,220 276,493 482,591 0 0
15.12%6.33%28.61%49.94%0.00%0.00%
Expenditure:
09-440-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 521,800 81,845 51,638 40,506 134,412 45,236 168,163
09-440-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 8,295 1,696 749 587 2,081 744 2,438
09-440-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 59,495 14,750 6,445 2,677 13,343 (5,131)27,411
09-440-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 103,350 9,507 11,534 9,040 27,730 8,009 37,530
09-440-141-000-000 S U I 11,720 2,475 1,735 1,535 3,135 1,104 1,736
09-440-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 29,960 1,652 259 246 5,819 598 21,386
09-440-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 18,525 2,909 1,823 1,438 4,774 1,612 5,969
Subtotal Labor and Payroll costs 753,145 114,834 74,183 56,029 191,294 52,172 264,633
09-440-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,300 0 0 0 0 0 1,300
09-440-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.1,955 0 0 0 500 0 1,455
09-440-220-000-000 FOOD/LUNCH AND SNACKS 30,200 2,000 0 2,000 26,200 0 0
09-440-221-000-000 TINY TOT PROGRAM 2,000 0 2,000 0 0 0 0
09-440-223-000-000 SCHOOL AGE PROGRAM 4,000 0 0 4,000 0 0 0
09-440-225-000-000 HOLIDAY DAY CAMP 200 0 0 200 0 0 0
09-440-228-000-000 PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS 11,000 0 0 0 11,000 0 0
09-440-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 880 0 0 0 0 0 880
09-440-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 5,500 0 0 0 0 0 5,500
09-440-238-000-000 UTILITIES 17,000 0 0 0 0 0 17,000
09-440-241-000-000 RENT/LEASE FACILITY 3,200 0 800 2,400 0 0 0
09-440-244-000-000 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 13,400 0 0 0 0 0 13,400
09-440-245-000-000 MAINTENANCE-BLDG & GROUNDS 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 2,500
09-440-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 2,500
09-440-247-000-000 SECURITY/FIRE SYSTEM MAINT 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 1,500
09-440-270-000-000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & MEETINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09-440-271-000-000 MILEAGE 200 0 0 0 0 0 200
09-440-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 0
09-440-700-000-000 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000
09-440-708-000-000 GRANT EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal Maintenance and Operations 100,335 2,000 2,800 10,600 37,700 0 47,235
Total Labor and M & O Prior to Allocations 853,480 116,834 76,983 66,629 228,994 52,172 311,868
Direct Cost %23.87%15.73%13.61%46.79%0.00%
Allocation of INDIRECT COSTS
Allocation of Other Subs - Based on Direct Cost %0 (0)10,206 17,556 24,410 (52,172)0
Allocation of Child Care Admin Costs Based on Direct Cost %0 74,446 49,053 42,456 145,913 0 (311,868)
Total Labor and M & O After Allocations to Programs 853,480 191,280 136,242 126,641 399,317 0 0
Fund: 09Total Net Budget: Prior to O/H Cost Alloc 112,917 (45,187)(75,022)149,852 83,274 0 0
10-999-998-440-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CHILD CARE 198,867 47,471 31,279 27,072 93,044 0 0
Fund: 09 Total Net Budget: After O/H Cost Allocation (85,950)(92,658)(106,301)122,780 (9,770)0 0
PROGRAMS
3.f
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
h
i
l
d
C
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
R
a
t
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
10-100-01 SECURED TAXES, CURRENT YEAR 330,831 410,055 419,475 419,475
10-100-02 UNSECURED TAXES, CURRENT YEAR 16,407 16,216 14,000 14,000
10-100-03 SECURED & UNSECURED TAXES, PY 31,872 20,583 30,000 30,000
10-100-04 REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 15,150 17,336 13,000 13,000
10-100-05 HOMEOWNERS PROPERTY TAX RELIEF 4,116 4,404 4,675 4,675
10-100-07 SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX (3,311)2,144 0 0
10-100-08 PENALTIES DELINQUENT TAXES 7,889 6,491 10,000 10,000
10-100-09 PROP TAX - VLF SWAP 930,175 881,747 885,360 871,686
10-100-10 PROP 1A TAX RECEIVABLE FINANCING 132,040 0 0 0
Property Taxes 1,465,170 1,358,977 1,376,510 1,362,836
10-200-01 FRANCHISE 409,429 423,146 398,750 423,500
10-200-02 SW FRANCHISE SWEEP FEE 34,743 51,520 35,480 51,520
10-200-03 BUSINESS LICENSE TAX 78,407 86,380 81,000 86,000
10-200-04 BUSINESS LICENSE PENALTIES 1,978 1,389 2,000 2,000
10-200-05 YARD & GARAGE SALE PERMITS 1,015 1,000 1,000 1,000
10-200-07 SIGN PLACEMENT PERMIT 1,500 1,150 1,000 1,000
10-200-08 CANDIDATE FILING FEES 0 2,250 0 1,250
10-200-09 PAVEMENT IMPACT FEE 7,844 41,920 24,180 40,000
10-200-10 MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 389 378 500 500
10-200-11 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS 650 700 600 600
10-200-13 REIMB. BOOKING FEES AB1662-'99 80 0 0 0
10-200-14 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 8,934 11,985 11,900 11,900
10-200-15 DOG LICENSE 18,498 17,994 16,000 16,000
10-200-16 ANIMAL SHELTER FEES 1,288 342 0 0
10-200-20 NPDES FEES 10,050 10,480 11,000 11,000
10-400-08 RENTAL INSPECTION FEES 71,417 91,042 62,250 44,000
Permits - Fees 646,222 741,676 645,660 690,270
10-300-02 SALES AND USE TAX 609,941 668,395 729,625 750,540
10-300-04 SALES TAX IN-LIEU 169,675 199,704 224,375 239,460
Sales Tax 779,615 868,099 954,000 990,000
10-300-05 MOTOR VEHICLE-IN-LIEU TAX 36,917 64,147 0 0
10-300-08 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0 0 0 16,000
10-300-14 EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE GRANT 12,497 412 0 0
10-300-16 COUNTY SOLID WASTE - ARTICLE 19 38,669 35,022 38,000 38,000
10-300-17 CALEMA/FEMA/CALTRANS EMERGENCY GRANTS 0 22,340 0 0
10-300-19 JAG POLICE GRANTS 9,636 0 0 0
10-300-22 COUNTY GRANTS 0 0 0 0
10-300-23 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 21,421 7,908 0 0
10-300-24 POLICE GRANTS 0 1,016 0 0
10-300-28 ENERGY EFF CONSERV BLOCK GRANT (EECBG)0 0 69,649 0
Intergovernmental 119,140 130,845 107,649 54,000
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
Page 1
3.g
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
10-400-06 ENGINEERING FEES -OTHER 0 567 0 0
10-410-01 BUILDING & SAFETY ISSUANCE FEES 0 7,161 5,000 4,800
10-410-02 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS 0 4,505 5,000 2,000
10-410-03 ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW 49,855 5,547 30,000 4,500
10-410-04 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION FEES 3,269 0 4,000 2,000
10-410-05 SUBDIVISION FEES 534 534 2,000 2,000
10-410-06 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 9,991 76,368 30,000 30,000
10-410-07 BUILDING & SAFETY PLAN REVIEW 0 18,853 6,000 8,000
10-410-08 PUBLIC WORKS ISSUANCE FEES 0 0 3,000 1,500
Building Fees 63,648 113,534 85,000 54,800
10-420-10 PLANNING - MISC. FEES 13,425 19,150 4,950 4,950
10-420-11 SITE & ARCHITEC. REVIEW 6,750 8,650 8,000 3,000
10-420-12 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,600 7,200 4,400 4,400
10-420-13 VARIANCE FEE 0 1,800 0 1,500
10-420-14 ENVIRONMNTL ASSESSMNT REPORTS 400 2,150 500 500
10-420-15 TENTATIVE/FINAL MAP FEES 0 1,800 0 0
Planning Fees 22,175 40,750 17,850 14,350
10-400-07 SALES, MAPS & PUBLICATIONS 1,296 2,797 500 500
10-400-21 RETURNED CHECK FEE 96 80 100 100
10-430-27 RECREATION CONTRACT CLASSES 588 0 0 0
10-430-30 RECREATION - AQUATICS 2,738 1,730 0 0
10-450-01 PARK USE FEES 3,250 2,690 2,500 1,000
10-450-02 PARK LIGHTS USE FEE 4,022 5,088 3,450 5,000
10-450-03 SPORTS LEAGUE FES/SURCHARGE 2,875 0 5,000 10,000
10-500-01 COURT FINES 2,654 931 1,000 1,000
10-500-02 PARKING CITATIONS 7,048 2,746 3,000 3,000
10-500-05 CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES 6,628 3,863 3,000 3,000
10-500-06 TOW CHARGE 4,140 5,980 5,000 5,000
10-500-07 PARKING CITES-SWEEP DAY 5,585 200 500 500
10-500-08 POLICE SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 0 1,147 0 0
10-500-09 PERMITTED PARKING 460 58 0 0
Misc Fees and Fines 41,379 27,309 24,050 29,100
10-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 17,131 11,993 20,000 20,000
10-600-05 RENTAL CITY FACILITIES 37,508 69,562 33,130 18,130
10-600-15 SALE OF PROPERTY 0 132,000 365,897 0
10-700-01 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,230 18,351 1,000 1,000
10-700-02 REFUNDS PY EXPENSE 92 85,519 0 0
10-700-12 SB90 STATE MANDATED COST REIMB 0 1,360 0 0
10-700-13 DAMAGE REIMBURSEMENTS 2,954 1,081 0 0
10-800-00 TRANSFER IN 0 819,235 5,000 5,000
10-800-20 RESIDUAL RECEIPTS SECURITY AGR- SR HSING 600,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Use of Property and Other 659,914 1,439,101 725,027 344,130
Fund: 10 Total General Fund Revenue:3,797,263$4,720,291$ 3,935,746$ 3,539,486$
Page 2
3.g
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
10-110-120-000-000 COUNCIL-STIPENDS 13,982 14,381 18,000 18,000
10-110-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 14,033 3,801 1,380 825
10-110-141-000-000 SUI 0 16 0 0
10-110-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 15,892 17,492 18,000 19,266
10-110-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 453 484 500 500
10-110-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 270 676 1,000 1,000
10-110-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 371 3,506 3,000 3,000
10-110-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 10,900 9,620 12,000 12,000
City Council Total 55,900.87 49,977.61 53,880.00 54,591.00
10-120-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 173,312 144,085 169,770 164,780
10-120-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 2,966 2,602 2,465 1,815
10-120-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 30,883 25,826 30,730 22,605
10-120-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 40,969 34,062 45,400 36,090
10-120-141-000-000 S U I 744 629 655 760
10-120-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 9,231 4,140 4,020 435
10-120-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 4,291 2,960 4,645 4,435
10-120-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 2,765 2,500 3,000 3,000
10-120-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 250 50 250 250
10-120-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 1,075 0 2,000 500
10-120-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 290 165 200 200
10-120-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 321 479 2,000 500
10-120-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 5,300 5,700 6,900 4,500
City Manager Total 272,398 223,198 272,035 239,870
10-125-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 104,526 99,841 58,140 42,330
10-125-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 1,660 1,535 840 615
10-125-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 18,471 16,947 10,520 7,665
10-125-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 22,603 20,718 12,735 9,450
10-125-141-000-000 S U I 556 648 330 325
10-125-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 7,149 7,372 3,942 4,130
10-125-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 2,517 2,036 1,590 1,505
10-125-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,596 1,961 2,000 2,000
10-125-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.(181)0 0 0
10-125-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 0 33 50 50
10-125-221-000-000 ELECTION EXPENSE 0 7,518 0 10,400
10-125-222-000-000 VOLUNTEER BANQUET/AWARD PROG 1,457 0 0 0
10-125-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 4,088 4,261 4,000 4,000
10-125-240-000-000 RENTS & LEASES - EQUIPMENT 499 499 500 500
10-125-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIP.105 543 300 300
10-125-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 21,303 21,852 19,560 18,900
10-125-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 330 135 415 415
10-125-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 0 0 440 440
10-125-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 6,000 4,500 2,700 2,700
City Clerk Total 192,677 190,400 118,062 105,725
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Page 1
3.h
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-140-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 150,667 127,616 135,635 131,628
10-140-111-000-000 INTER/PT TEMPORARY HELP 21,080 0 0 0
10-140-115-000-000 OVERTIME 100 203 2,000 2,000
10-140-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 2,406 1,980 1,970 1,910
10-140-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 26,284 22,797 24,450 23,825
10-140-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 33,049 27,912 29,705 29,380
10-140-141-000-000 S U I 816 1,040 980 1,045
10-140-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 8,188 10,593 11,805 13,195
10-140-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 3,646 2,696 3,710 4,675
10-140-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 2,777 2,555 3,000 3,000
10-140-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.977 0 0 0
10-140-241-000-000 RENT/LEASE FACILITY 1,428 1,428 1,440 1,440
10-140-246-000-000 SOFTWARE SUPPORT 19,889 20,549 24,541 24,990
10-140-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 33,156 14,907 17,785 17,785
10-140-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,460 1,450 (2,000)2,500
10-140-255-010-000 PAYROLL PROCESSING FEES 11,030 14,278 13,350 13,350
10-140-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 400 300 390 390
10-140-268-000-000 TRAINING 0 0 500 500
10-140-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 63 0 450 450
10-140-271-000-000 MILEAGE 57 0 100 100
10-140-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 3,600 2,340 2,700 2,160
10-140-701-000-000 CAPITAL PURCHASE/ LEASE 2,180 0 0 0
Finance Total 323,253 252,643 272,511 274,323
10-160-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 85,219 63,739 60,000 60,000
City Attorney Total 85,219 63,739 60,000 60,000
10-172-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 43,357 57,108 39,015 64,390
10-172-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 646 743 785 935
10-172-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 7,331 9,738 9,780 11,655
10-172-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 8,971 11,846 11,830 14,270
10-172-141-000-000 S U I 237 385 415 455
10-172-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 2,303 4,668 4,990 5,755
10-172-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 1,067 1,164 1,480 2,285
10-172-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 811 604 1,106 645
10-172-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.436 0 0 0
10-172-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPT. EXPENSE 436 1,217 1,734 500
10-172-238-000-000 UTILITIES 648 842 720 360
10-172-246-000-000 MAINTENANCE/OPERATION OF EQUIP 1,305 3,064 4,000 3,000
10-172-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 39,980 35,710 40,000 25,000
10-172-255-000-000 ENGINEERING/CONSULTING 3,669 0 4,000 2,000
10-172-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP AND DUES 415 510 365 365
10-172-268-000-000 TRAINING 0 375 750 750
10-172-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 8 0 0 0
10-172-271-000-000 MILEAGE 133 70 200 200
10-172-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 3,300 840 840 1,260
Building and Safety Total 115,054 128,883 122,010 133,825
Page 2
3.h
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-175-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 31,708 77,751 65,003 67,875
10-175-115-000-000 OVERTIME 0 1,581 5,000 5,000
10-175-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 555 1,042 945 985
10-175-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 5,869 13,403 11,768 12,285
10-175-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 7,182 16,348 14,233 15,150
10-175-141-000-000 S U I 113 645 587 520
10-175-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 1,820 7,611 7,049 6,420
10-175-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 791 1,572 1,778 2,410
10-175-199-000-000 LABOR FORCE ALLOCATION-PROJECTS 0 (16,489)0 0
10-175-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 374 567 955 500
10-175-218-000-000 SMALL TOOLS 0 978 3,000 3,000
10-175-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.436 0 0 0
10-175-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPT. EXPENSE 436 121 500 500
10-175-238-000-000 UTILITIES 519 758 720 360
10-175-240-000-000 RENT/LEASE EQUIPMENT 0 4,376 5,000 2,500
10-175-246-000-000 MAINTENANCE/OPERATION OF EQUIP 599 1,252 2,000 1,500
10-175-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 390 0 24,000 20,000
10-175-255-000-000 ENGINEERING/CONSULTING 53,067 55,219 45,000 30,000
10-175-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP AND DUES 0 67 250 0
10-175-268-000-000 TRAINING 175 100 250 250
10-175-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 500 0 0 0
10-175-271-000-000 MILEAGE 135 0 0 0
10-175-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 15,933 20,000 15,000
10-175-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 900 630 840 1,265
10-175-701-000-000 EQUIPMENT 0 0 7,000 5,000
Public Works Total 105,570 183,465 215,878 190,520
10-180-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 174,500 41,367 0 0
10-180-115-000-000 OVERTIME 3,366 0 0 0
10-180-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 2,910 703 0 0
10-180-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 25,692 7,413 0 0
10-180-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 31,365 9,016 0 0
10-180-141-000-000 S U I 1,103 422 0 0
10-180-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 9,981 3,791 0 0
10-180-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 3,724 672 0 0
10-180-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 2,064 33 0 0
10-180-218-000-000 SMALL TOOLS 1,911 0 0 0
10-180-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 199 0 0 0
10-180-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 0 346 0 0
10-180-240-000-000 RENT/LEASE EQUIPMENT 4,695 (75)0 0
10-180-245-000-000 MAINT OF BUILDING & GROUNDS 16,794 0 0 0
10-180-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIP.8,666 0 0 0
10-180-247-000-000 CIV CTR SECURITY SYSTEM 824 0 0 0
10-180-250-000-000 PROF SVS - SWIM PROGRAM 8,925 0 0 0
10-180-255-000-000 ENGINEERING SERVICES 17,154 0 0 0
10-180-257-000-000 HVAC SERVICE AGREEMENT 51,760 5,998 0 0
10-180-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 145 0 0 0
10-180-268-000-000 TRAINING 285 0 0 0
10-180-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 9 0 0 0
10-180-271-000-000 MILEAGE 37 0 0 0
10-180-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 16,894 0 0 0
Page 3
3.h
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-180-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 300 0 0 0
10-180-700-000-000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 4,045 0 0 0
10-180-701-000-000 COMPUTER UPGRADES 2,459 4,513 0 0
10-180-706-000-000 CIVIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 12,038 0 0 0
Community Services Total 401,845 74,199 0 0
10-185-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 42,369 47,814 0 45,060
10-185-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 2,011 2,251 0 655
10-185-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 0 777 0 8,160
10-185-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 4,386 4,770 0 10,060
10-185-141-000-000 SUI 605 868 0 435
10-185-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 163 134 0 5,365
10-185-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 1,027 1,000 0 1,600
10-185-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 736 775 0 700
10-185-218-000-000 UNIFORMS/SMALL TOOLS 0 0 0 300
10-185-246-000-000 SOFTWARE SUPPORT 3,547 3,557 0 0
10-185-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 0 0 0 75
10-185-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 0 0 1,500
Code Enforcement/Rental Inspection Total 54,845 61,945 0 73,910
10-187-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 0 0 4,557 4,765
10-187-255-000-000 EMERGENCY VETERINARY COSTS 0 0 1,000 1,000
10-187-256-000-000 PUBLIC HEALTH - ANIMAL CONTROL 71,808 104,349 104,184 104,184
10-187-257-000-000 WEED ABATEMENT - CONTRACT SVCS 7,580 15,726 13,530 13,530
10-187-258-000-000 HOUSEHOLD HAZ/WASTE CONTRACT-COUNTY15,553 15,855 15,855 16,535
Enforcement Programs Total 94,941 135,930 139,126 140,014
10-190-209-000-000 CASH OVER/SHORT (69)9 0 0
10-190-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 582 452 1,500 1,500
10-190-211-000-000 POSTAGE & MAILING 9,297 7,984 10,000 10,000
10-190-212-000-000 COPYING EXPENSE 3,462 4,241 3,640 3,640
10-190-215-000-000 COUNTY ADMIN FEE-PROPERTY TAX 23,080 21,960 24,800 24,800
10-190-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 22,713 7,896 7,000 7,000
10-190-221-000-000 REWARD PROGRAM 0 0 500 0
10-190-224-000-000 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 923 807 2,500 2,500
10-190-226-000-000 CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 297 186 300 300
10-190-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 13,544 13,026 11,125 11,125
10-190-238-000-000 UTILITIES 47,363 50,331 51,000 51,000
10-190-242-000-000 RENT/LEASE OF PROPERTY 101 101 101 101
10-190-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 2,571 2,699 3,000 3,000
10-190-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 2,000 14,560 14,560
10-190-251-000-000 BANKING SERVICE CHARGES 5,072 8,612 6,000 500
10-190-260-000-000 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS 119,286 123,975 110,310 90,400
10-190-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 9,485 10,282 9,790 9,790
10-190-700-000-000 EQUIPMENT LEASE PAYMENTS 8,059 7,197 8,004 8,004
10-190-702-001-000 DECEMBER 2010 WINTER STORM DAMAGE 0 105,462 0 0
10-190-723-000-000 FIRE STATION IMPROVMNTS (COUNTY AGRMNT)236,165 0 0 0
10-190-999-000-000 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 181,987 38,836 61,160 91,520
Non Departmental 683,918 406,056 325,290 329,740
Page 4
3.h
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-195-245-000-000 MAINT OF BUILDING & GROUNDS 0 8,724 26,500 26,500
10-195-245-020-000 MAINTENANCE CITYWIDE TREES 0 0 5,000 5,000
10-195-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 0 8,282 12,500 10,000
10-195-247-000-000 CIVIC CTR SECURITY SYSTEM 0 1,105 4,200 2,000
10-195-257-000-000 HVAC SERVICE AGREEMENT 0 51,341 50,000 50,000
10-195-706-000-000 CIVIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 15,000 15,000
10-195-720-000-000 EQUIPMENT & SERVICES-GRANTS 0 3,150 69,649 0
Facilities Maintenance Total 0 72,602 182,849 108,500
10-370-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 145,752 125,363 114,737 156,810
10-370-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 2,466 2,142 2,022 2,275
10-370-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 25,295 22,135 25,210 28,380
10-370-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 31,841 26,937 30,501 34,990
10-370-141-000-000 S U I 749 785 828 955
10-370-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 8,436 7,881 9,970 11,840
10-370-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 3,580 2,611 3,803 5,565
10-370-199-000-000 LABOR FORCE ALLOCATION-PROJECTS 0 (8,038)0 0
10-370-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 3,709 2,367 2,000 1,500
10-370-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 650 0 0 0
10-370-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 1,812 2,142 3,000 1,500
10-370-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,429 2,753 4,000 2,500
10-370-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,344 0 0 0
10-370-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 50 0 0 0
10-370-268-000-000 TRAINING 175 0 0 0
10-370-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 90 0 0 0
10-370-271-000-000 MILEAGE 300 0 100 100
10-370-273-000-000 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE 0 1,440 1,800 1,800
10-370-701-000-000 COMPUTER/UPGRADE 369 0 0 0
Community Development Total 275,049 188,517 197,971 248,215
10-380-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 51,480 33,752 34,435 45,915
10-380-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 774 465 500 435
10-380-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 9,158 6,109 6,235 8,310
10-380-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 11,207 7,431 7,540 10,245
10-380-141-000-000 SUI 336 294 330 330
10-380-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 4,642 3,684 3,940 5,375
10-380-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 1,209 744 945 1,630
10-380-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE/SUPPLIES 774 0 2,000 2,000
10-380-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS - DSL 2,480 400 2,000 2,000
10-380-249-000-000 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE SERVICES 8,661 3,875 7,500 7,500
10-380-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 6,785 7,118 10,500 10,500
10-380-268-000-000 TRAINING 999 0 750 750
10-380-271-000-000 MILEAGE 55 0 0 0
10-380-701-000-000 COMPUTER/UPGRADES/PLOTTER 0 147 2,500 2,500
IS Dept Total 98,559 64,020 79,175 97,490
Page 5
3.h
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-410-220-000-000 GAS & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 45,024 45,780 48,107 58,000
10-410-250-000-000 SHERIFF OVERTIME 25,041 13,916 26,700 26,700
10-410-255-000-000 COWCAP -COUNTY COST ALLOCATION 50,913 54,288 57,275 78,488
10-410-256-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES-COUNTY 1,552,773 1,858,034 1,651,684 1,581,407
10-410-257-000-000 CRIME PREVENTION EXPENSES 236 0 500 500
10-410-258-000-000 CAL ID 13,088 13,108 13,500 13,500
10-410-701-009-000 EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES HOMELAND SEC GRAN0 17,448 0 0
10-410-701-011-000 CAPITAL EQUIP SUPPLIES - JAG GRANT 2,960 0 0 0
Law Enforcement Total 1,690,035 2,002,574 1,797,766 1,758,595
10-450-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 39,254 44,362 20,471 16,335
10-450-115-000-000 OVERTIME 1,124 2,277 0 0
10-450-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 549 635 300 240
10-450-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 4,357 6,143 3,709 2,960
10-450-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 7,730 9,429 4,483 3,645
10-450-141-000-000 S U I 810 762 229 175
10-450-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 2,921 4,854 2,596 2,120
10-450-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 716 916 559 580
10-450-235-000-000 COMMUNICATION 620 551 700 500
10-450-238-000-000 UTILITIES & REFUSE REMOVAL 36,884 32,269 45,000 30,000
10-450-245-000-000 MAINT OF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 37,580 10,719 45,255 34,110
10-450-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 6,910 2,919 10,000 10,000
10-450-255-000-000 Contract Services 0 0 18,990 34,740
10-450-701-000-000 MINOR EQUIPMENT 0 1,200 5,000 5,000
Parks Total 139,454 117,035 157,292 140,405
10-625-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 40,015 27,435 39,190
10-625-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 0 684 400 570
10-625-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 0 7,230 4,965 7,095
10-625-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 0 8,795 6,010 8,750
10-625-141-000-000 SUI 0 315 200 285
10-625-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 0 3,118 2,390 3,480
10-625-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 0 844 750 1,390
10-625-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 0 239 435 300
10-625-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 0 20,300 31,500 28,630
10-625-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 0 0 700 200
10-625-246-000-000 MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS/EQUIPMENT 0 492 7,700 7,700
10-625-255-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,641 0 0 0
10-625-268-000-000 TRAINING 0 0 175 175
10-625-271-000-000 MILEAGE 0 0 420 420
10-625-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 588 840
10-631-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,400 16,000 16,000 16,000
Storm Drain Maintenance Total 13,041 98,033 99,668 115,025
10-801-120-000-000 COMMISSION STIPENDS 2,350 1,891 2,200 2,200
10-801-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 0 430 195 65
10-801-141-000-000 SUI 0 10 0 0
10-801-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 67 0 0 0
10-804-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 36 0 300 300
10-804-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 291 1,137 900 900
Historical Cultural Total 2,744 3,468 3,595 3,465
Page 6
3.h
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-805-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 14,181 1,193 0 0
10-805-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 206 17 0 0
10-805-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 3,133 126 0 0
10-805-141-000-000 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 547 (2)0 0
10-805-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 338 310 0 0
10-805-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,136 0 0 0
10-805-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP 8,280 693 0 0
10-805-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 833 0 0 0
10-805-222-000-000 SENIOR CITIZENS' PUBLICATION 806 556 0 0
10-805-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 1,229 1,735 3,000 3,000
10-805-238-000-000 UTILITIES 11,371 21,660 18,000 18,000
10-805-245-000-000 MAINTENANCE BLDG. & GROUNDS 1,135 1,281 5,000 5,000
10-805-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 322 0 1,000 1,000
Senior Citizens Total 43,517 27,569 27,000 27,000
10-808-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 411 220 350 350
10-808-221-000-000 CERT PROGRAM 2,773 2,996 2,000 3,000
10-808-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 1,079 1,004 1,120 1,120
10-808-245-000-000 MAINT/BLDGS & GROUNDS 680 503 0 1,000
10-808-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 853 696 3,950 2,950
10-808-247-000-000 EMERG EQUIP PURCH 741 2,276 2,000 2,000
10-808-248-000-000 REPLENISH FOOD RATIONS 331 409 200 200
10-808-700-000-000 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 103 334 500 500
10-808-701-000-000 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 758 0 0 0
10-808-702-000-000 CABINET & SHELVES 202 220 200 200
10-808-706-000-000 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 0 0 0 150
10-808-708-000-000 CERT GRANT 7,541 0 0 0
10-808-709-000-000 HOMELAND SECURITY (HSGP)9,075 0 0 0
EOC/CERT Total 24,547 8,658 10,320 11,470
10-950-310-000-000 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 0 0
GF - Capital Projects Total 0 0 0 0
Page 7
3.h
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Fund: 10 GENERAL FUND
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Expenditure:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
10-999-998-110-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - COUNCIL (55,901)(49,978)(53,880)(54,591)
10-999-998-120-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CITY MANAGER (272,398)(223,198)(272,035)(294,665)
10-999-998-125-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CITY CLERK (192,677)(190,400)(118,062)(102,114)
10-999-998-140-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - FINANCE DEPT (323,252)(252,643)(275,011)(274,438)
10-999-998-160-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION -CITY ATTORNEY (85,219)(63,739)(60,000)(60,000)
10-999-998-172-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - BUILDING & S 22,885 26,174 33,646 26,392
10-999-998-175-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - PUBLIC WORKS 80,359 33,385 45,977 37,910
10-999-998-180-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - COMM.EVNTS (14,525)37,033 0 0
10-999-998-185-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION-RENTAL INSP 25,661 23,091 0 26,038
10-999-998-190-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - NON-DPTL.(265,766)(253,176)(249,071)(221,321)
10-999-998-370-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CED 104,189 78,575 83,715 102,871
10-999-998-380-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - GIS (98,559)(72,602)(79,175)(97,490)
10-999-998-410-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - LAW ENFRCMT 161,420 188,221 135,931 175,505
10-999-998-440-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CHILD CARE 0 0 0 0
10-999-998-450-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - PARK MAINT.27,162 20,508 26,711 22,326
10-999-998-625-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION NPDES 0 0 10,592 10,592
10-999-998-631-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - STORM DRAIN 13,142 17,753 4,588 7,614
10-999-998-801-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - PLANNING CMM 2,304 1,987 155 1,269
10-999-998-804-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION-HC 25,376 22,134 11,199 12,933
10-999-998-805-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION- SENIOR CITIZ 20,135 16,076 3,965 11,820
10-999-998-808-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - EOC 19,057 15,434 23,005 9,758
Cost Allocation Total (806,607)(625,365)(727,750)(659,591)
Fund: 10 Total Expenditure:3,865,961 3,727,547 3,406,678 3,453,092
Less: Labor Charged Directly to Bond Projects and Park Grant (75,000)
3,865,961 3,727,547 3,406,678 3,378,092
Page 8
3.h
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
Fund: 09 Child Care Center Fund
09-440-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 532,171 521,567 521,800 521,800
09-440-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 11,841 11,423 11,015 9,295
09-440-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 65,683 58,991 59,495 59,495
09-440-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 106,067 103,354 101,400 103,350
09-440-141-000-000 S U I 10,435 12,537 11,720 11,720
09-440-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 28,173 27,878 29,235 29,960
09-440-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 12,521 11,520 14,270 18,525
09-440-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,734 1,696 1,800 1,300
09-440-219-000-000 OFFICE FURNITURE/MINOR EQUIP.812 3,273 3,155 1,955
09-440-220-000-000 FOOD/LUNCH AND SNACKS 30,575 31,098 32,200 30,200
09-440-221-000-000 TINY TOT PROGRAM 1,744 1,215 2,060 2,000
09-440-223-000-000 SCHOOL AGE PROGRAM 3,439 3,055 4,820 4,000
09-440-225-000-000 HOLIDAY DAY CAMP 78 82 200 200
09-440-228-000-000 PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS 14,623 11,562 13,560 11,000
09-440-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 429 426 880 880
09-440-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 4,930 6,036 5,500 5,500
09-440-238-000-000 UTILITIES 15,617 16,013 17,000 17,000
09-440-241-000-000 RENT/LEASE FACILITY 2,400 0 3,200 3,200
09-440-244-000-000 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 12,100 12,150 13,400 13,400
09-440-245-000-000 MAINTENANCE-BLDG & GROUNDS 3,327 2,816 4,460 2,500
09-440-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 2,777 3,636 3,500 1,500
09-440-247-000-000 SECURITY/FIRE SYSTEM MAINT 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
09-440-270-000-000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & MEETINGS 1,745 150 2,060 0
09-440-271-000-000 MILEAGE 0 0 200 200
09-440-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1,577 2,468 3,200 2,000
09-440-700-000-000 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 567 556 2,000 1,000
09-440-708-000-000 GRANT EXPENDITURES 0 0 800 0
09-950-310-000-000 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 34,200 0
09-999-998-440-000 O/H COST ALLOCATION - CHILD CARE 235,319 149,686 213,253 198,867
Child Care Center Total 1,102,180 994,686 1,111,883 1,052,347
Fund: 11 STREET FUND
11-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 943 13,746 17,011 49,284
11-999-999-000-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT 6,883 0 290,600 317,000
Fund: 11 Total Expenditure:7,826 13,746 307,611 366,284
Fund: 12 STORM DRAIN FUND
12-903-701-000-000 NPDES AGREEMENT 10,580 0 0 0
12-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 3,464 0 0 0
Fund: 12 Total Expenditure:14,044 0 0 0
Fund: 13 PARK FUND
13-445-706-000-000 FIELD REHAB - PICO PARK 0 0 15,000 15,000
13-445-710-000-000 ORANGE GROVE PARKWAY 39,517 0 0 0
13-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC PARK FUND 7,697 0 2,716 2,385
Fund: 13 Total Expenditure:47,214 0 17,716 17,385
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Other City Funds
Page 1
3.i
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Fund: 14 SLESF (AB3229 COPS)
14-411-256-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - COUNTY 285,525 99,595 100,000 99,500
14-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 500 500 0 500
Fund: 14 Total Expenditure:286,025 100,095 100,000 100,000
Fund: 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
15-500-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 673 (1,600)0
15-500-601-000-000 ELECTRICAL VEHICLE/STATIONS 297 0 0 0
15-500-705-000-000 VEHICLES/CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0 31,876 0 0
15-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 41 1,627 0 0
Fund: 15 Total Expenditure:338 34,176 (1,600)0
Fund: 16 GAS TAX FUND
16-175-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 104,963 94,148 62,483 57,350
16-175-115-000-000 OVERTIME 538 4,802 5,000 5,000
16-175-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 1,562 1,601 910 835
16-175-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 18,869 16,253 11,317 10,380
16-175-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 23,091 19,734 13,691 12,800
16-175-141-000-000 SUI 448 976 658 545
16-175-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 10,977 10,804 7,935 6,655
16-175-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 2,787 1,912 1,717 2,035
16-175-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 210 210 420
16-510-238-000-000 UTILITIES (ELECTRICITY)75,428 76,300 81,250 82,450
16-510-255-000-000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 12,353 10,062 15,000 23,615
16-900-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 1,312 538 550 550
16-900-254-000-000 STREET SWEEPING 49,606 49,350 54,000 54,000
16-900-257-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PATCHING 2,650 22,227 53,630 53,630
16-900-258-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SVC-OTHER 17 0 0 0
16-900-260-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SVS-ARCH BARR REMV 17,474 0 0 0
16-900-999-000-000 TRANSFER OUT 68,114 0 50,000 29,000
16-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 31,059 43,514 33,865 44,015
Fund: 16 Total Expenditure:421,249 352,431 392,216 383,280
Fund: 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
17-900-255-000-000 Contract Svcs 82,226 54,950 49,000 49,000
17-910-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 7,018 7,281 1,285 0
17-910-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 537 546 100 0
17-910-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 0 62 0 0
17-910-141-000-000 S U I 285 398 75 0
17-910-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 165 168 40 0
17-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 11,838 4,525 3,313 4,640
17-999-999-000-000 TRANSFER TO COPS FUND 14 45,000 0 0 0
Fund: 17 Total Expenditure:147,070 67,930 53,813 53,640
Fund: 19 FACILITIES FUND
19-xxx-xx 0 0 0 0
Fund: 19 Total Expenditure:0 0 0 0
Page 2
3.i
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Fund: 20 MEASURE "I" FUND
20-200-708-000-000 MICHIGAN - REHAB 790 0 40,000 0
20-200-717-000-000 CITY-WIDE SLURRY PROGRAM 0 0 17,000 17,000
20-200-722-000-000 CRACK SEALING PROGRAM 0 0 24,000 24,000
20-200-723-000-000 CITY-WIDE STRIPING PROGRAM 0 0 7,000 7,000
20-200-725-000-000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LA CADENA/BARTON 0 70,000 0 0
20-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 11,000 32,746 24,072 15,605
20-999-999-000-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT - F47 58,000 0 0 0
20-999-999-001-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT - F46 0 162,472 182,676 192,000
20-999-999-002-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT - F44 43,984 0 0 0
Fund: 20 Total Expenditure:113,774 265,218 294,748 255,605
Fund: 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND
21-140-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 7,958 0 0
21-175-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 49,939 38,093 14,385
21-175-115-000-000 OVERTIME 0 1,283 1,500 1,500
21-175-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 0 871 555 210
21-175-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 0 8,808 6,899 2,605
21-175-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 0 10,700 8,348 3,210
21-175-141-000-000 SUI 0 468 347 155
21-175-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 0 4,909 4,165 1,865
21-175-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 0 992 1,041 515
21-175-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 0 74 618 618
21-175-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT 0 0 600 600
21-175-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 0 2,000 2,000
21-175-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 34,920 25,040
21-175-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 0 200 0 0
21-175-271-000-000 MILEAGE 0 77 0 0
21-175-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 630 420 420
21-570-802-000-000 PAYMENTS/WST.WTR.TREATMENT 1,197,163 1,193,540 1,200,000 1,200,000
21-572-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 55,834 0 0 0
21-572-115-000-000 OVERTIME 521 0 0 0
21-572-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 977 0 0 0
21-572-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 10,059 0 0 0
21-572-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 12,305 0 0 0
21-572-141-000-000 S U I 358 0 0 0
21-572-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 3,965 0 0 0
21-572-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 1,436 0 0 0
21-572-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 161 0 0 0
21-572-246-000-000 MAINT/OPERATION OF EQUIP.522 0 0 0
21-572-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,174 14,795 0 0
21-573-602-000-000 SEWER RODDING/MAINTAINANCE 25,292 1,935 15,000 15,000
21-573-603-000-000 VIDEO INSPECTION -PIPES 0 0 12,500 12,500
21-573-604-000-000 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 88,570 0 99,000 99,000
21-573-605-000-000 LAB TESTING 0 11,084 12,500 25,000
21-573-704-000-000 FLOW METER EQUIPMENT 0 800 100,000 100,000
21-625-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 0 11,760 20,620
21-625-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 0 0 170 300
21-625-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 0 0 2,130 3,735
21-625-140-000-000 RETIREMENT SYSTEM 0 0 2,575 4,605
21-625-141-000-000 SUI 0 0 85 150
21-625-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 0 0 1,025 1,870
21-625-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE 0 0 325 735
Page 3
3.i
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
21-625-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 0 0 190 190
21-625-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 0 0 13,500 13,500
21-625-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 0 0 300 300
21-625-246-000-000 MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS.EQUIPMENT 0 0 3,300 3,300
21-625-268-000-000 TRAINING 0 0 75 75
21-625-271-000-000 MILEAGE 0 0 190 190
21-625-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 252 252
21-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 157,454 107,939 131,440 157,448
21-999-999-000-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT - F16 100,000 0 0 0
Fund: 21 Total Expenditure:1,669,792 1,417,002 1,705,823 1,711,893
Fund: 22 CDBG
22-425-301-000-000 CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS 0 7,550 53,092 0
22-425-302-000-000 SENIOR HOME REPAIR 0 0 39,017 0
22-425-305-000-000 FAMILY SERVICES 0 0 4,995 0
22-425-307-000-000 CODE ENFORCEMENT 0 0 8,000 27,933
22-425-308-000-000 LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRAM 0 0 4,996 10,000
22-425-309-000-000 TIME FOR A CHANGE FOUNDATION 0 0 0 6,000
22-999-999-000-000 OPERATING TRANSFER OUT 0 252,469 0 0
Fund: 22 Total Expenditure:0 260,019 110,100 43,933
Fund: 26 LNDSCP & LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST
26-600-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 10,992 0 0
26-600-238-000-000 UTILITIES - ST LIGHTING 598 598 800 800
26-600-239-000-000 UTILITIES - WATER 1,402 1,110 800 800
26-600-245-000-000 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 0 0 70 2,000
26-600-250-000-000 LEGAL FEES 1,400 1,200 1,200 1,200
26-600-257-000-000 ENGINEERING FEES 0 381 447 447
26-601-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 0 5,497 0 0
26-601-238-000-000 UTILITIES - ST LIGHTING 498 498 600 800
26-601-239-000-000 UTILITIES - WATER 283 268 500 500
26-601-250-000-000 LEGAL FEES 1,249 1,663 1,049 1,049
26-601-257-000-000 ENGINEERING FEES 0 130 440 440
26-602-238-000-000 UTILITIES - ST LIGHTING 697 697 866 866
26-602-239-000-000 UTILITIES - WATER 0 0 251 251
26-602-250-000-000 LEGAL FEES 451 0 0 0
26-602-257-000-000 ENGINEERING FEES 0 0 99 99
26-999-998-000-000 TSF-IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOC 901 3,752 1,111 3,883
26-999-999-000-000 TRANSFER OUT 0 0 5,000 5,000
Fund: 26 Total Expenditure:7,479 26,785 13,233 18,135
TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS:3,816,991 3,532,088 4,105,543 4,002,502
Page 4
3.i
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Fund: 41 PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND
41-300-200-000-000 BOND REPAYMENTS - INTEREST 68,670 0 0 0
41-300-201-000-000 BOND REPAYMENTS - PRINCIPAL 2,239,286 0 0 0
41-300-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62,904 0 0 0
41-999-999-000-000 TRANSFER OUT 86 0 0 0
Fund: 41 Total Expenditure:2,370,946 0 0 0
Fund: 44 CAPITAL PROJECT - BIKE LANE
44-400-623-000-000 MT VERNON - PICO TO RAVEN 103,360 0 0 0
Fund: 44 Total Expenditure:103,360 0 0 0
Fund: 46 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - STREETS
46-400-274-000-000 MICHIGAN/MAIN SIGNAL LIGHT 990 0 255,000 255,500
46-400-275-000-000 GLENDORA STREET IMPROVEMENTS 68,114 0 0 0
46-900-301-000-000 PUBLIC ALLEY PAVEMENT REHAB-PRJ#70009-01495 7,390 0 0
46-900-302-000-000 MISC SIDEWALK REPAIRS-PRJ#70009-002 0 20,801 0 0
46-900-303-000-000 BARTON/PRESTON INTRST-PRJ#70009-003 550 5,863 0 0
46-900-304-000-000 BARTON ROAD PAVEMENT REHAB-PRJ70009-0044,290 72,593 0 0
46-900-305-000-000 MICH AVE PAV REHAB PHASEI-PRJ#70009-005 0 50,656 0 0
46-900-306-000-000 MICH AVE PAV REHAB PHSEII-PRJ#70009-006 0 0 94,632 0
46-900-310-002-000 GT ROAD CONSTRUCTION 0 209,079 0 0
46-900-310-003-000 GT ROAD CONTINGENCY 0 4,705 0 0
46-900-310-004-000 GT ROAD PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 25,600 0 0
46-900-311-000-000 MICHIGAN WIDENING (VB to COMMERCE)0 0 124,600 124,000
46-900-312-000-000 DEC. 2010 WINTER STORM DAMAGE 0 0 246,000 0
46-900-313-000-000 PICO ST.- REPAVING 0 0 88,044 0
46-900-314-000-000 IOWA-MAIN ST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 0 50,000 0
46-900-315-000-000 ROBIN WAY & WARBLER AVE - PAVING 0 0 0 159,000
Fund: 46 Total Expenditure:74,439 396,686 858,276 538,500
Fund: 47 CAP.PRJ. BARTON/COLTON BRIDGE
47-400-250-000-000 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 6,005 0 94,088 0
47-400-250-001-000 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 31,642 26,583 0 0
47-400-250-003-000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 92,460 0 0 0
47-400-250-005-000 HAZ MAT SURVEY 9,006 0 0 0
Fund: 47 Total Expenditure:139,114 26,583 94,088 0
Fund: 48 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
48-600-325-000-000 WEST SIDE PARK 0 0 595,000 0
48-600-325-003-000 WEST SIDE PARK -CONSTRUCTION MGMT 0 0 177,093 1,358,540
Fund: 48 Total Expenditure:0 0 772,093 1,358,540
Fund: 50 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND- Bond Proceeds
50-xxx-xx MICHIGAN STREET DESIGN AND ROW 0 0 428,695 480,000
50-xxx-xx Staff Project Time 0 0 0 75,000
50-xxx-xx Barton Road Infrastructure 0 0 0 100,000
50-xxx-xx Project Area Land Assembly 0 0 0 1,000,000
Fund: 50 Total Expenditure 0 0 428,695 1,655,000
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS:2,687,858 423,270 2,153,152 3,552,040
Capital Project Funds
Page 5
3.i
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
Fund: 31 GT RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
31-999-xx TRANSFER IN 0 0 0 0
Fund: 31 Total Expenditure:0 0 0 0
Fund: 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
32-200-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 114,407 167,330 111,460 106,830
32-200-115-000-000 OVERTIME 265 0 0 0
32-200-120-000-000 AGENCY DIRECTORS' STIPENDS 8,475 3,660 4,200 0
32-200-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 1,960 2,914 1,675 1,550
32-200-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 20,482 30,064 20,175 19,335
32-200-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 25,188 38,068 26,055 26,580
32-200-141-000-000 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 448 867 695 500
32-200-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 5,555 8,383 7,630 4,945
32-200-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 2,610 3,500 3,053 3,790
32-200-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 0 61 500 500
32-200-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 0 2,497 10,000 10,000
32-200-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,948 96,417 70,000 70,000
32-200-251-000-000 ATTORNEY-CRA 85,219 62,031 60,000 60,000
32-200-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,338 15,906 15,000 15,000
32-200-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 0 1,012 0 0
32-200-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 4,790 2,610 3,840
32-370-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 85,622 96,970 59,675 55,965
32-370-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 1,506 1,641 865 610
32-370-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 15,672 17,349 10,805 10,130
32-370-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 19,410 21,089 13,070 13,070
32-370-141-000-000 SUI 461 462 260 260
32-370-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 4,744 5,864 3,155 2,690
32-370-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 1,942 2,053 1,642 1,990
32-370-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 20 0 0 0
32-370-213-000-000 NEWSLETTER 10,440 10,800 0 0
32-370-230-000-000 ADVERTISING 0 0 0 10,000
32-370-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES 17,372 0 5,000 85,000
32-370-250-001-000 LEGAL SETTLEMENTS 0 105 0 0
32-370-255-000-000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,805 1,738 76,820 44,320
32-370-255-001-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,813 0 0 0
32-370-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 1,709 0 0 0
32-370-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 3,600 1,800 1,440 1,440
32-600-212-000-000 TOWNE CENTER PROJECT 72,327 17,763 0 0
32-600-214-000-000 21992 DeBERRY STREET 49 0 0 0
32-600-215-000-000 PARCEL # 1167-141-08-MICH & COMMERCE 399 0 0 0
32-600-301-000-000 22747 BARTON ROAD (OLD CIRCLE K)15,875 366 0 0
32-600-302-000-000 BARTON ROAD PROPERTY 22100-22200 BLOCK1,774 0 0 0
32-600-303-000-000 STORM DRAIN PROJECT - CJUSD 0 130,000 0 0
32-600-304-000-000 COMMERCIAL EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM52,357 52,214 220,429 0
32-600-305-000-000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGAM31,295 9,682 39,035 0
32-600-307-000-000 PROPERTY PURCHASE - VISTA GRANDE 18,890 121 0 0
32-600-308-000-000 PURCHASE 0275-242-10-22100 BLK BARTON RD200,926 0 0 0
32-600-309-000-000 COMMUNITY MESSAGE BOARD 66,210 0 0 0
Successor Agency Funds
Page 6
3.i
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
32-600-310-000-000 GRAND TERRACE ROAD -REHAB 24,041 0 0 0
32-600-311-000-000 SENIOR CENTER KITCHEN PROJECT 10,068 149,886 0 0
32-600-311-002-000 SENIOR KITCHEN CONTINGENCY 0 10,533 0 0
32-600-312-000-000 BASEBALL FIELD PROJECT 44,326 366,751 42,469 0
32-600-312-002-000 BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 0 6,356 0 0
32-600-312-003-000 BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION- MGMT 0 57,635 0 0
32-600-313-000-000 DOG PARK 0 0 35,000 0
32-600-320-000-000 LANDSCAPE PROJECTS- CITY BEAUTIFICATION 111 37,940 0 0
32-600-321-000-000 ROAD IMPRVMNTS/TRAFF CIRCULATION DESIGN 0 43,133 0 0
32-600-323-000-000 MICH/BARTON/LAPAIX ST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 0 325,982 535,671 0
32-600-323-002-000 MICH/BARTON/LAPAIX ST PUB IMPV CONTINGCY 0 13,455 0 0
32-600-323-003-000 MICH/BARTON/LAPAIX ST PUB IMPV PRJ MGMT 0 53,722 0 0
32-600-323-004-000 MICH/BARTN/LAPAIX PUB IMP PRJ MGM CNTGCY 0 354 0 0
32-600-325-000-000 WEST SIDE PARK 0 3,350 0 0
32-600-325-199-000 WEST SIDE PARK LABOR FORCE ALLOC-PRJ 0 7,365 0 0
32-600-327-000-000 PURCHASE LOW MOD PROPERTIES 0 0 0 463,167
32-600-999-000-000 TRANSFER TO INVENTORY (200,926)0 0 0
32-999-998-200-000 TSF IN (OUT) O/H COST ALLOC-ADMIN (51,454)16,216 0 (23,908)
32-999-998-370-000 TSF IN (OUT) O/H COST ALLOC-ECON D 85,234 105,551 72,350 160,023
32-999-998-600-000 COST ALLOCATION - PROJECTS 0 0 (11,783)0
32-999-999-000-000 TRANSFER OUT 0 2,075,307 183,088 0
Fund: 32 Total Expenditure:856,513 4,081,053 1,622,044 1,147,627
Fund: 32 Successor Agency -CRA Bond FUND
31-999-999 TRANSFER OUT 0 0 0 1,655,000
Fund: 31 Total Expenditure:0 0 0 1,655,000
Fund: 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND
33-140-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 49,978 15,500 40,000
33-300-206-000-000 '97 COP LEASE PAYMENTS 173,647 254,848 254,848 254,848
33-300-208-000-000 04 TA BONDS - INT 215,150 1,831,925 104,625 104,625
33-300-208-001-000 04 TA BONDS - PRINC 1,610,000 0 1,720,000 1,720,000
33-300-209-000-000 2011 TAX ALLOC BONDS - DEBT SERVICE 0 0 949,750 949,750
33-300-210-000-000 TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES 6,045 6,808 12,115 12,115
33-300-215-000-000 COUNTY ADMIN FEE COLL PROP TAX 95,680 75,985 96,000 96,000
33-300-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,550 0 7,000 7,000
33-300-701-000-000 ERAF TRANSFER 2,289,449 526,510 88,310 88,310
33-400-705-000-000 PASS-THROUGH EXPENDITURE 1,951,455 1,901,198 1,820,830 1,820,830
33-400-705-250-000 PASS-THOUGH STATUTORY 131,106 98,842 107,915 107,915
33-400-706-000-000 PASS-THROUGH CJUSD 0 262,569 0 0
33-999-998-000-000 TSF IN(OUT) O/H COST ALLOCATION 190,101 146,450 228,352 46,849
33-999-999-000-000 TRANSFER OUT 350,000 3,993,713 1,791,000 0
Fund: 33 Total Expenditure:7,024,183 9,148,825 7,196,245 5,248,242
Fund: 34 LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND
34-140-250-000-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 2,954 3,225 0
34-400-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 115,094 87,360 77,495 0
34-400-115-000-000 OVERTIME 13 0 0 0
34-400-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 1,885 1,498 1,125 0
34-400-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 20,783 15,690 14,025 0
34-400-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 25,510 19,590 18,065 0
34-400-141-000-000 S U I 395 358 390 0
34-400-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 6,195 4,440 4,221 0
Page 7
3.i
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Other Funds:
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Expenditures
34-400-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 2,680 1,776 2,120 0
34-400-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,726 60 200 0
34-400-215-000-000 COUNTY ADMIN FEE COLL PROP TAX 23,920 18,882 0 0
34-400-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 13 0 0 0
34-400-235-000-000 COMMUNICATIONS 1,397 99 1,320 0
34-400-238-000-000 UTILITIES 1,480 930 1,896 0
34-400-246-000-000 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 1,542 89 0 0
34-400-251-000-000 LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 16,930 1,265 40,000 0
34-400-255-000-000 CONTRACT SERVICES 2,306 0 0 0
34-400-273-000-000 AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 2,920 2,100 0
34-500-726-000-000 SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT 333,348 0 0 0
34-500-727-000-000 MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT 520 0 0 0
34-700-709-000-000 12569 MICHIGAN 154 132,060 0 0
34-700-710-000-000 11695 CANAL 154 60 0 0
34-700-767-000-000 22293 BARTON RD 149 60 0 0
34-700-780-000-000 22317 BARTON RD.120 0 0 0
34-700-850-000-000 RESIDUAL RECEIPTS SEC AGRMT CITY 600,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
34-800-110-000-000 SALARIES/WAGES 21,869 20,512 22,340 0
34-800-115-000-000 OVERTIME 275 0 0 0
34-800-138-000-000 MEDICARE/FICA 381 351 440 0
34-800-139-000-000 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 3,976 3,713 5,495 0
34-800-140-000-000 RETIREMENT PLAN 4,865 4,528 6,645 0
34-800-141-000-000 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 98 171 260 0
34-800-142-000-000 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 437 56 3,155 0
34-800-143-000-000 WORKERS COMP.INSURANCE 651 652 830 0
34-800-210-000-000 OFFICE EXPENSE 58 944 800 0
34-800-218-000-000 UNIFORMS/SMALL TOOLS 82 0 500 0
34-800-220-000-000 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL 839 522 450 0
34-800-265-000-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 75 75 75 0
34-800-268-000-000 TRAINING 848 0 350 0
34-800-270-000-000 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MTGS 0 0 600 0
34-800-271-000-000 MILEAGE 120 0 200 0
34-800-272-000-000 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2,318 3,918 1,500 0
34-999-001-000-000 04 TA DEBT SVS SHARE 608,688 619,301 608,513 0
34-999-998-400-000 TSF IN (OUT) O/H COST ALLOC HOUSNG 113,264 (4,462)(2,088)0
34-999-998-800-000 TSF IN (OUT) O/H COST ALLOC-CODE E 9,246 3,575 14,138 0
Fund: 34 Total Expenditure:1,924,401 1,243,947 1,130,385 300,000
Fund: 37 CRA PROJECTS TRUST
37-600-324-000-000 STATER BROS ECON DEV AGREEMENT 0 0 241,500 241,500
Fund: 37 Total Expenditure:0 0 241,500 241,500
TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS:9,805,097 14,473,824 10,190,174 8,592,369
Page 8
3.i
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
Fund: 09 CHILD CARE CENTER FUND
09-440-21 TINY TOT PROGRAM 58,868 67,380 61,760 61,220
09-440-23 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM G/T & T/V 223,682 236,329 252,990 276,493
09-440-28 PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAM 677,322 621,710 687,300 628,684
09-300-22 COUNTY GRANTS 0 0 35,000 0
Fund: 09 Total Child Care Revenue:959,872$ 925,419$ 1,037,050$ 966,397$
Fund: 11 STREET FUND
11-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 4,153 4,446 2,000 2,000
11-800-04 ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT FEE 48,842 425,972 5,000 5,000
11-800-05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT FEE 5,152 37,568 0 0
Fund: 11 Total Revenue: 58,147 467,986 7,000 7,000
Fund: 12 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT
12-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 361 249 350 350
12-800-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEES 3,503 2,234 0 0
Fund: 12 Total Revenue:3,864 2,483 350 350
Fund: 13 PARK FUND
13-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,227 881 1,100 1,100
13-800-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEES 506 7,241 6,000 6,000
Fund: 13 Total Revenue:1,733 8,122 7,100 7,100
Fund: 14 SLESF (AB3229 COPS)
14-300-01 AB3229 COPS ALLOCATION 102,840 100,000 100,000 100,000
14-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1 95 0 0
14-800-00 TRANSFER IN 183,185 0 0 0
Fund: 14 Total Revenue:286,026 100,095 100,000 100,000
Fund: 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
15-300-01 AQMD/DMV FEE - SUBVENTION 13,839 14,151 14,000 14,000
15-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 341 218 250 250
Fund: 15 Total Revenue:14,180 14,369 14,250 14,250
Fund: 16 GAS TAX FUND
16-300-02 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF -PROP 42 113,478 0 0 0
16-300-20 HIGHWAY USER TAX 2103 0 107,888 134,105 134,105
16-300-21 GAS TAX - 2105 68,475 70,145 62,130 62,130
16-300-22 GAS TAX - 2106 46,997 48,851 46,360 46,360
16-300-23 GAS TAX - 2107 91,264 90,837 88,150 88,150
16-300-24 GAS TAX - 2107.5 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
16-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 60 180 0 0
16-800-00 TRANSFERS IN 100,000 0 0 0
16-800-10 SWEEP FEE & PAVEMENT MGMT TRANSFER 34,742 38,836 59,660 91,520
Fund: 16 Total Revenue:458,016 359,738 393,405 425,265
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
Other City Funds
Page 1
3.j
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
Fund: 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
17-300-01 REIMB CROSSING GUARD -C.U.S.D.9,233 0 0 0
17-500-03 VEHICLE CODE FINES 207,197 80,517 70,000 70,000
17-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 96 (126)0 0
17-999-00 TRANSFER-IN 0 0 1,500 1,500
Fund: 17 Total Revenue:216,526 80,391 71,500 71,500
Fund: 19 FACILITIES FUND
19-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,057 785 200 200
19-800-01 GENERAL FACILITIES DEV FEE 2,064 1,102 0 0
19-800-02 PUBLIC FACILITIES DEV FEE 0 674 0 0
Fund: 19 Total Revenue:3,121 2,561 200 200
Fund: 20 MEASURE "I" FUND
20-300-01 MEASURE I - 1/2CENT SALES TAX 138,111 154,208 140,000 140,000
20-300-03 STIMULUS GRANT FUNDS 0 162,472 76,413 10,000
20-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 413 601 500 500
Fund: 20 Total Revenue:138,524 317,281 216,913 150,500
Fund: 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND
21-400-20 SERVICE CHARGE 1,507,970 1,485,912 1,468,800 1,468,800
21-400-23 DELINQ SVC CHG/TAX ROLL 0 0 500 500
21-400-25 SEWER CONNECTION FEES -G.T.300 300 12,000 12,000
21-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 15,282 9,580 12,000 12,000
21-600-11 INVESTMENT EARNINGS: RESERVE 48 779 2,000 2,000
Fund: 21 Total Revenue:1,523,601 1,496,571 1,495,300 1,495,300
Fund: 22 CDBG
22-300-08 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0 105,000 110,100 43,933
22-300-11 CDBG PROJECTS 0 147,469 0 0
Fund: 22 Total Revenue:0 252,469 110,100 43,933
Fund: 26 LNDSCP & LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST
26-100-01 TAX ROLL ASSESSMENTS 5,928 5,671 5,635 5,635
26-100-02 PICO/ORIOLE ASSESSMENT DIST 4,484 5,575 5,100 5,100
26-100-03 FORREST CITY/II ASSESS.DIST 1,217 1,838 3,600 3,600
26-103-01 PENALTY & INTEREST 58 239 0 0
Fund: 26 Total Revenue:11,687 13,322 14,335 14,335
Fund: 41 PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND
41-100-01 BOND PROCEEDS 1,881,286 0 0 0
41-100-03 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 46,223 0 0 0
Fund: 41 Total Revenue:1,927,509 0 0 0
TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS:5,602,807 4,040,807 3,467,503 3,296,130
Page 2
3.j
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
Fund: 44 CAPITAL PROJECT - BIKE LANE
44-300-01 TDA-LTF ARTICLE 3 GRANT-BIKE/P 98,187 0 0 0
44-800-00 TRANSFERS IN - LOCAL MATCH 47,198 0 0 0
Fund: 44 Total Revenue:145,385 0 0 0
Fund: 46 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - STREETS
46-300-08 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0 147,469 0 0
46-300-15 TRANSFER-CONTRIB FROM STRT FND 3,669 0 290,600 255,500
46-300-16 CONTRIBUTION-GAS TAX FUND 68,114 0 50,000 29,000
46-300-20 CONTRIBUTION-MEASURE I FD 0 162,472 182,676 254,000
46-300-21 TRANSFER FROM CRA 0 48,572 89,000 0
46-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 0 0 0 0
46-700-01 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0 70,000 0 0
46-700-26 FEDERAL HWY REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 246,000 0
Fund: 46 Total Revenue:71,783 428,513 858,276 538,500
Fund: 47 CAP.PRJ. BARTON/COLTON BRIDGE
47-100-01 CONTRIB FROM MEAS I 58,000 0 0 0
47-100-02 CONTRIB - CITY OF COLTON 20,385 0 0 0
47-100-03 STATE GRANT FUNDS 124,212 0 0 0
47-900-99 TRANSFER IN 9,060 0 94,088 0
Fund: 47 Total Revenue:211,657 0 94,088 0
Fund: 48 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
48-300-10 STATE GRANTS 0 0 953,207 1,358,540
Fund: 48 Total Revenue:0 0 953,207 1,358,540
Fund: 50 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND- Bond Proceeds
50-900-99 TRANSFER IN (From Bond Proceeds)0 0 0 1,655,000
Fund: 50 Total Revenue:0 0 0 1,655,000
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS:428,826 428,513 1,905,571 3,552,040
Capital Project Funds
Page 3
3.j
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
Actual Actual
Amended
Budget
Prelim
Budget
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013
Revenue:Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
City of Grand Terrace
Revenues
Fund: 31 GT RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
31-100-00 PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION 0 0 0 6,500,000
31-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 0 0 0 75,000
Fund: 31 Total Revenue:0 0 0 6,575,000
Fund: 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
32-100-01 PROCEEDS FROM BOND ISSUE 0 18,528,672 0 0
32-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 675 7,035 0 0
32-600-05 RENTS 50,318 56,948 46,000 0
32-700-01 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0 1,013 0 0
32-800-00 TRANSFER IN 350,000 4,098,713 1,791,000 0
Fund: 32 Total Revenue:400,993 22,692,381 1,837,000 0
Fund: 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND
33-100-07 SECURED TAXES, ORIGINAL 737,836 623,600 632,850 0
33-100-08 CURRENT UNSECURED TAXES 198,723 160,119 20,000 0
33-100-09 SECURED TAXES, REVISED 4,858,597 3,962,359 4,400,595 0
33-100-10 SECURED & UNSECURED TAXES P/Y 332,592 298,866 200,000 0
33-100-11 SUPPLEMENTAL PROP TAX/ORIGINAL (2,377)3,438 0 0
33-100-12 SUPPLEMENTAL PROP TAX/REVISED (29,890)(626)5,000 0
33-100-13 HOMEOWNER PROP TX RLF/ORIGINAL 17,818 41,155 17,900 0
33-100-14 HOMEOWNER PROP TX RLF/REVISED 102,316 51,229 105,000 0
33-100-15 PENALTIES DELINQUENT TAXES 99,225 64,843 25,000 0
33-100-99 TAX INCREMENT UNALLOCATED 0 (1,749,520)0 0
33-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 48,298 30,071 38,000 0
33-700-10 PROCEEDS FROM DEBT 0 1,757,800 0 0
33-700-99 TRANSFERS 86 0 0 0
33-800-00 TRANSFER FROM LOW-MOD HOUSING 608,688 619,301 608,513 0
Fund: 33 Total Revenue:6,971,913 5,862,636 6,052,858 0
Fund: 34 LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND
34-100-16 20% SETASIDE 1,579,178 1,301,246 1,263,360 0
34-100-99 TAX INCREMENT - UNALLOCATED 0 (459,072)0 0
34-400-01 INTEREST, LOW INC HSING LOANS 1,210 619 1,200 0
34-400-02 PRINCIPAL, LOW INC HSING LOANS 21,588 1,926 1,000 0
34-600-01 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 7,222 3,629 15,000 0
34-600-15 SALE OF PROPERTY 0 132,000 0 0
Fund: 34 Total Revenue:1,609,197 980,349 1,280,560 0
Fund: 37 CRA PROJECTS TRUST
37-300-21 TRANSFER FROM CRA 0 1,207,500 0 0
Fund: 37 Total Revenue:0 1,207,500 0 0
TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS:8,982,103 30,742,866 9,170,418 6,575,000
Successor Agency Funds
Page 4
3.j
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
O
N
-
G
F
-
O
T
H
E
R
F
u
n
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
F
Y
B
u
d
g
e
t
1
2
-
1
3
(
1
0
5
6
:
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
F
Y
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
B
u
d
g
e
t
)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES • MAY 8, 2012
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center • 22795 Barton Road
City of Grand Terrace Page 1 Updated 5/16/2012 12:15 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency
Invocation
Pastor Andy McRae, Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church offered the invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance
Council Member Gene Hays led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Walt Stanckiewitz Mayor Present
Lee Ann Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Present
Darcy McNaboe Councilwoman Present
Bernardo Sandoval Councilman Present
Gene Hays Councilman Present
Betsy Adams City Manager Present
Joyce Powers Community and Economic Development Director Present
Bernie Simon Finance Director Present
Tracey Martinez City Clerk Present
Richard Shields Director of Building & Safety/Public Works Present
Richard Adams City Attorney Present
Ed Finneran San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Present
Manny Mendoza San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Present
Rick McClintcock San Bernardino County Fire Department Present
1.ITEMS TO DELETE
2.SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A.Riverside Highland Water Company -Poster Contest Winners -Terrace View Elementary School
Don Hough, Riverside Highland Water Company, thanked the Mayor and Council for allowing him and the
Students from Terrace View Elementary School to share their Water Awareness Posters. He introduced
each of the winners of the contest and had them display their posters.
B.Update by SANBAG and CAltrans on Barton Road Overpass at I-215
Khalil Saba, SANBAG and Jim Robinson, Caltrans, gave an update on the I-215 Barton Road
Interchange. He reported that the Environmental Phase is almost complete. Final design should start in
June or July of 2012 and will be led by Caltrans. They are considering three alternatives and described
each of them and went over the cost comparisons. They outlined the project schedule, indicating that it is
their projection to be open for traffic by Fall 2017.
3.B
Packet Pg. 75
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
8
,
2
0
1
2
6
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 8, 2012
City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Updated 5/16/2012 12:15 PM
Jeffrey McConnell
Stated that there was a meeting a few weeks ago where some of the businesses on the south west
corner expressed their concern with the right in/right out on La Crosse. He indicated that he is working
with Dr. McDuffy on the corner property on La Crosse and questioned how this will affect his property and
business. He also questioned how much right-of-way condemnation are they going to take off of the west
section of La Crosse. He has attended other meetings with regard to this project. He stated that they
didn't mention Newport Bridge and it is his belief that it was supposed to be done first.
C.Proclamation -Blue Ribbon Week -Week of May 13, 2012
Council Member Gene Hays read the Proclamation proclaiming the Week of May 13, 2012, as Blue
Ribbon Week in the City of Grand Terrace.
3.CONSENT CALENDAR
RESULT:APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER:Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER:Darcy McNaboe, Councilwoman
AYES:Stanckiewitz, Garcia, McNaboe, Sandoval, Hays
A.Waive Full Reading of Full Ordinances on Agenda
C.Approval of Minutes –Regular Meeting –04/24/2012
ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
B. Check Register No. 05-08-2012
RESULT:APPROVED [4 TO 0]
MOVER:Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER:Bernardo Sandoval, Councilman
AYES:Walt Stanckiewitz, Lee Ann Garcia, Bernardo Sandoval, Gene Hays
ABSTAIN:Darcy McNaboe
4.PUBLIC COMMENT
Barney Barnett
Reported that Highgrove is 127 years old this year. They will have their annual Highgrove Days
"Highgrove Hoedown" this Saturday, May 12th at Highgrove Community Park. They will have a pancake
breakfast, car show, vendors, entertainment and more. He invited everyone to come out from 9 a.m. to 2
p.m. For more information go to www.highgrovehappenings.net.
Sally McGuire
Reminded everyone that Grand Terrace Days will be held on June 9th . A Business and Marketing Expo
will be held at the event and encouraged all of the businesses to get involved. All proceeds from the
business expo will be donated back to the Foundation for future events. The Chamber Installation will be
held on June 28, 2012. She welcomed back Baskets Ahh La Cart, as it is a great addition to the City.
5.COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Darcy McNaboe
3.B
Packet Pg. 76
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
8
,
2
0
1
2
6
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 8, 2012
City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Updated 5/16/2012 12:15 PM
Reported that she attended the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Advisory Commission on
Water Policy. One of the major presentations given was about the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Their
effort has been to establish a more reliable system and also simultaneously support environmental goals
protecting fish species and providing a reliable water supply. The decision on the preferred Delta
Conveyance alternative is finally being promised by the first of June this year. She commended Curb
Numbering Service for the curb numbering job they did in the City, they were very professional and she is
happy that they did this service. The Lion's Club Pancake Breakfast that was held on Sunday, April 29,
2012 was to benefit the Grand Terrace Elementary Library. She doesn't have the numbers of the dollar
amount that will go to the library but she thanked all of the individuals that came out to support the Lion's
Club and the Grand Terrace Elementary School Library. She indicated that the Grand Terrace Fire
Department will hold their Pancake Breakfast on June 9th and the proceeds are going to benefit the
Paramedic Program.
Council Member Bernardo Sandoval
Requested that the Council Meeting be adjourned in memory of Jean Irola.
Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia
Complimented the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee on their Annual Art Show. She would like
to see some of the art showcased at City Hall. Grand Terrace Days is so much fun and a great time for
the entire family. Reminded everyone that there is still a gap to close with the paramedic fund and
encouraged everyone to help reach that goal. She stated that we are entering the season of celebrating
family and she hopes everyone enjoys this time.
Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz
Assemblyman Mike Morell will no longer represent Grand Terrace because of the redistricting. He has
done a lot for Grand Terrace and has always kept us informed. He shared a couple of emails with regard
to AB 1437, which would create a transparent budget process that was killed, and Legislation Resolution
94 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee that would have honored and commemorated the 102nd
Anniversary of the Boy Scouts that was also killed. He stated that many people have expressed their
desire to have a paramedic in town and we have a great opportunity in front of us and we need to step up
and make those donations. He reported that a long time resident and good friend of his passed away
over the weekend, Jimmie Prime, and he would like to adjourn the meeting in his memory.
6.PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8.NEW BUSINESS
A.Council Appointed Committee Reappointment Procedures
To approve Option Number 3 which directs Staff to send letters to the committee members whose term
will be expiring and ask if they wish to seek reappointment. For those who wish to be reappointed, staff
will recommend to the Council that they be reappointed to their respective committee for a four year term.
For the terms of the committee members who do not wish to seek reappointment, staff will post a Notice
of Vacancy, pursuant to Government Code Section 54974, and accept applications for the vacated terms.
Council will review the applications and/or interview the applicant(s) and make the appointment without
the recommendation of the members of the existing committee members.
3.B
Packet Pg. 77
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
8
,
2
0
1
2
6
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
Minutes Grand Terrace City Council May 8, 2012
City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Updated 5/16/2012 12:15 PM
RESULT:APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER:Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER:Gene Hays, Councilman
AYES:Stanckiewitz, Garcia, McNaboe, Sandoval, Hays
B.Ad Hoc Committee for Review of Responses to Audit Services Request for Proposals
Approve an Ad Hoc Committee responsible for the review of the responses of the Audit Services Request
for Proposals and appoint the City Manager, Finance Director, Community and Economic Development
Director, Councilmember Darcy McNaboe, Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia and Mayor Walt Stanckiewitz
as the alternate to Mayor Pro Tem Garcia, if she is unable to attend all of the scheduled interviews, to the
committee.
RESULT:APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER:Bernardo Sandoval, Councilman
SECONDER:Gene Hays, Councilman
AYES:Stanckiewitz, Garcia, McNaboe, Sandoval, Hays
9.CLOSED SESSION
A.Employee Negotiations -Labor Negotiations Per Government Code 54957.6 -City Labor Negotiator -
Betsy Adams, City Manager -Negotiated with -All Unrepresented Employees
B.Public Employee Performance Evaluation Per Government Code Section 54957 (B) Title: City Manager
Mayor Stanckiewitz announced that the Council met in Closed Session to discuss Labor Negotiations per
Government Code 54957.6. A report was given by the City Manager, however, there was no action
taken. The Council also met in Closed Session to discuss the City Manager's Performance Evaluation
per Government Code 54957 (B) Council discussed the performance, appraisal, and the process,
however, no action was taken.
ADJOURN
Mayor Stanckiewitz adjourned the Grand Terrace City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency
to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency in memory of Jean Irola and Jimmie Prime.
The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 22, 2012 at 6:00 PM. with a Budget
Workshop at 4:00 p.m.
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
3.B
Packet Pg. 78
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
8
,
2
0
1
2
6
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council & Successor Agency Item
TITLE:Check Register No. 05-22-2012
PRESENTED BY:Bernie Simon, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION:Approve Check Register Dated 05-22-2012 as Submitted
BACKGROUND:
The Check Register for May 22, 2012 is presented in accordance with Government
Code §37202.
The attached index to the warrant register is a guideline account list only and is not
intended to replace the voluminous list of accounts used by the City and Successor
Agency CRA. Expenditure account number formats are XX-XXX-XXX [Fund-Depart-
General Account]. Expenditures may be made from trust/agency accounts (fund 23-
xxx-) or temporary clearing accounts which do not have budgetary considerations.
A total of $238,874.38 in accounts payable checks was issued during the period for
services, reimbursements, supplies and contracts and are detailed in the attached
Check Register sections. Payroll costs for the period amounted to $60,651.50 and are
summarized below.
Some of the non-routine items include:
68053 Ace Weed
Abatement
Weed Abatement throughout City $391.50
68055 Tiffany Avant Child Care Tuition Reimbursement $168.50
Some the larger items include:
68058 Chevron Vehicle Fuel for City Vehicles $900.94
68068 GT Chamber of
Commerce
Consultant Services $860.00
68074 Jan-Pro Cleaning
Service
Cleaning Service for City Facilities $1,075.00
68075 Jones & Mayer April Services $8,074.00
68076 Keller Street
Sweeping
April Services $4,200.00
68084 S.B. County Public
Works Dept.
4th Qtr NPDES Flood Control $9,900.00
68086 S.B. County Sheriff Law Enforcement Services $156,161.13
68092 Transportation Traffic Engineering Services $3,418.80
3.C
Packet Pg. 79
Engineering (TEP)
68095 Willdan Engineering Services $8,400.00
68099 Zions Bank HVAC Semiannual Capital Lease $14,409.50
Payroll costs processed for period ending April 27, 2012:
Date Period Payroll and payroll costs
04/27/12 Biweekly $60,651.50
FISCAL IMPACT:
All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2011-12.
ATTACHMENTS:
·voucher listing
·Warrant Register Account Index
APPROVALS:
Bernie Simon Completed 05/16/2012 3:51 PM
Finance Completed 05/16/2012 3:52 PM
City Attorney Completed 05/16/2012 3:56 PM
City Manager Completed 05/16/2012 6:02 PM
City Council Pending
3.C
Packet Pg. 80
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
1
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
68036 5/3/2012 011206 AUL 3121 TRUST PRend 4-27-12 APPLE Contributions for PRend 4-27-12
10-022-68-00 274.58
Total : 274.58
68037 5/7/2012 010164 GREAT-WEST PR End 4/14&4/27 Contributions/Loans PR End 4/14&4/27
10-022-63-00 5,698.94
10-022-64-00 1,817.02
Total : 7,515.96
68038 5/7/2012 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 1077917514 Apr/May Wireless Service - Public Works
10-175-240-000-000 157.64
Total : 157.64
68039 5/7/2012 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY April 2012 April Engery Usage
10-175-238-000-000 71.68
10-172-238-000-000 71.68
10-190-238-000-000 1,999.42
10-440-238-000-000 738.10
16-510-238-000-000 482.96
10-450-238-000-000 974.22
10-805-238-000-000 684.07
Total : 5,022.13
68040 5/7/2012 011199 PRUDENTIAL MUNICIPAL POOL 0000338643May EMPLYEE PAID LONG/SHORT TERM DISABILITY
10-022-66-00 943.83
Total : 943.83
68041 5/7/2012 011199 PRUDENTIAL MUNICIPAL POOL 0000338643aMay EMPLOYEE LIFE/AD&D/DEP LIFE/EAP INS
1Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
2
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
68041 5/7/2012 (Continued)011199 PRUDENTIAL MUNICIPAL POOL
10-120-142-000-000 21.24
10-125-142-000-000 11.73
10-140-142-000-000 25.82
10-172-142-000-000 10.31
10-175-142-000-000 12.15
10-370-142-000-000 27.18
10-380-142-000-000 6.82
10-440-142-000-000 98.78
21-625-142-000-000 2.13
10-450-142-000-000 3.50
32-200-142-000-000 16.89
10-625-110-000-000 4.96
32-370-142-000-000 10.45
16-175-142-000-000 10.91
21-175-142-000-000 6.79
34-400-142-000-000 11.37
34-800-142-000-000 4.01
Total : 285.04
68042 5/8/2012 011138 SPARKLETTS 9637116050112 April Bottled Water
10-190-238-000-000 99.46
10-440-238-000-000 96.25
10-450-238-000-000 15.88
10-805-238-000-000 15.88
Total : 227.47
68043 5/8/2012 011196 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE 1061586 MAY EMPLOYEE PAID VISION INSURANCE
10-022-61-00 134.40
Total : 134.40
68044 5/8/2012 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 6035322500233683Maintenance Supplies
10-172-210-000-000 30.24
10-808-245-000-000 5.37
10-195-245-000-000 43.54
10-440-245-000-000 20.83
Total : 99.98
2Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
3
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
68045 5/8/2012 001213 AT & T APR/MAY 2012 Apr/May Phones & Internet Services
10-190-235-000-000 521.37
10-440-235-000-000 389.30
10-450-235-000-000 46.63
10-805-235-000-000 161.48
10-808-235-000-000 93.42
Total : 1,212.20
68046 5/8/2012 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025-116 Mar/Apr Wireless Svc-Maint/C.Care
10-175-240-000-000 174.75
10-440-235-000-000 49.66
Total : 224.41
68047 5/8/2012 010812 LOWE'S COMMERCIAL SERVICES 9800 682121 3 Sink for C. Care
10-440-245-000-000 168.09
Total : 168.09
68048 5/9/2012 011194 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO A819662-May EMP PAID ACCIDENT/SUPP LIFE/SUPP STD INS
23-250-20-00 781.92
Total : 781.92
68049 5/9/2012 011195 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 746082A MAY EMP PD FLEX SPENDING/DEPENDENT CARE
23-250-10-00 816.68
Total : 816.68
68050 5/9/2012 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY APRIL 2012 April CNG Fuel/Natural Gas Usage
10-190-238-000-000 131.21
10-440-238-000-000 33.87
10-175-272-000-000 7.80
10-440-272-000-000 2.60
34-800-272-000-000 2.60
Total : 178.08
68051 5/10/2012 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY APR 2012 April Natural Gas Usage Sr Ctr
10-805-238-000-000 84.05
Total : 84.05
68052 5/14/2012 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY APR 2012 APR 2012 ENERGY USAGE
3Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
4
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
68052 5/14/2012 (Continued)006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY
16-510-238-000-000 5,409.63
26-600-238-000-000 49.80
26-601-238-000-000 41.50
26-602-238-000-000 58.10
Total : 5,559.03
68053 5/22/2012 011188 ACE WEED ABATEMENT, INC.119 Apn 0275-231-48/66 Weed Abatement
10-450-245-000-000 391.50
Total : 391.50
68054 5/22/2012 010693 ARROWHEAD UNITED WAY 05032012 PR End 4/27/12 Donations
10-022-65-00 32.50
Total : 32.50
68055 5/22/2012 011234 AVANT, TIFFANY 04302012 Tuition Reimbursement
10-440-23 168.50
Total : 168.50
68056 5/22/2012 011170 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.51-GR 409631 May/Jun Residential Sewer 21974 De
32-600-216-000-000 54.00
Total : 54.00
68057 5/22/2012 001713 CA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION SL 120825 Jan-Mar I-215 Ramps Energy & Maint
16-510-238-000-000 281.51
Total : 281.51
68058 5/22/2012 010218 CHEVRON & TEXACO CARD SERVICES 7898191957 April Vehicle Fuel
10-175-272-000-000 792.48
10-440-272-000-000 70.49
34-800-272-000-000 37.97
Total : 900.94
68059 5/22/2012 011031 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 150593971 FY 2011-12
10-440-228-000-000 213.12
150602816 FY 2011-12
10-440-228-000-000 213.12
4Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
5
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 426.24 68059 5/22/2012 011031 CINTAS CORPORATION #150
68060 5/22/2012 001810 CITY NEWSPAPER GROUP 15642 Publication for hearing -May 17th
10-370-230-000-000 116.55
Total : 116.55
68061 5/22/2012 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 177481 Supplies for parks
10-450-245-000-000 122.11
Total : 122.11
68062 5/22/2012 011166 CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 0182901 APRIL ARCHIVE TAPE STORAGE
10-140-250-000-000 56.65
10-380-250-000-000 56.65
Total : 113.30
68063 5/22/2012 010711 DANKA FINANCIAL SERVICES 76749279 May Konica Minolta Lease
10-172-246-000-000 79.05
10-175-246-000-000 79.05
Total : 158.10
68064 5/22/2012 001950 DATA QUICK B1-2035296 April Subscription Services
32-200-220-000-000 43.50
10-370-250-000-000 43.50
10-380-250-000-000 43.50
Total : 130.50
68065 5/22/2012 001942 DATA TICKET INC.40893 Mar Parking Cite Processing Services
10-140-255-000-000 100.00
Total : 100.00
68066 5/22/2012 002082 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY D15644280101 TINY TOT SUPPLIES
10-440-221-000-000 414.00
10-440-221-000-000 8.49
Total : 422.49
68067 5/22/2012 002301 FEDEX 1-047-90728 April Document Delivery
10-370-210-000-000 78.72
5Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
6
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 78.72 68067 5/22/2012 002301 FEDEX
68068 5/22/2012 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 6895-RDA MAY 2012 CONSULTANT SERVICES
32-370-255-000-000 860.00
Total : 860.00
68069 5/22/2012 010632 HIGH TECH SECURITY SYSTEMS 100290 FY 2011-12 SECURITY CAMERA MONITORING
10-450-246-000-000 60.00
10-195-247-000-000 20.00
Total : 80.00
68070 5/22/2012 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC.07099555-0 Graffiti Supplies
10-195-245-000-000 68.59
Total : 68.59
68071 5/22/2012 003490 INMARK/VICTOR 122282 Name Tags, Historical & City Clerk
10-804-220-000-000 18.10
10-125-220-000-000 18.09
Total : 36.19
68072 5/22/2012 011235 IQM2 INC.3311 May 2012 Monthly Maintenance
10-125-250-000-000 550.00
Total : 550.00
68073 5/22/2012 002727 J.R. FREEMAN COMPANY 484529-0 Name plates/Oversite Board Members
32-200-210-000-000 105.22
Total : 105.22
68074 5/22/2012 011211 JAN-PRO CLEANING SYSTEMS 31844 MAY CLEANING SERVICES
10-195-245-000-000 741.00
10-450-245-000-000 334.00
Total : 1,075.00
68075 5/22/2012 011216 JONES & MAYER 59391 General Litigation April 2012
10-160-250-000-000 74.00
59392 Retainer April 2012
10-160-250-000-000 4,000.00
32-200-251-000-000 4,000.00
6Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
7
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 8,074.00 68075 5/22/2012 011216 JONES & MAYER
68076 5/22/2012 010773 KELLAR SWEEPING INC.6769 April 2012 Street Sweeping
16-900-254-000-000 4,200.00
Total : 4,200.00
68077 5/22/2012 005400 OFFICE DEPOT 607687361001 Building & Safety Supplies
10-172-210-000-000 80.33
10-175-210-000-000 80.33
Total : 160.66
68078 5/22/2012 011218 PAY PLUS SOLUTIONS, INC.1885 May CalPers Reporting
10-140-255-010-000 97.00
Total : 97.00
68079 5/22/2012 010400 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 04412486 TEACHER APPRECIATION TOTES
23-200-14-00 178.90
Total : 178.90
68080 5/22/2012 010171 REPUBLIC ITS RR - 122754 QuikNet Maintenance Nov 2011
16-510-255-000-000 390.00
Total : 390.00
68081 5/22/2012 006285 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO 042412 April/May 2012 Sewer Billing
21-572-255-000-000 162.87
Total : 162.87
68082 5/22/2012 006451 S.B. COUNTY ASSESSOR 104978 Updated accessor parcels maps
10-172-220-000-000 6.00
Total : 6.00
68083 5/22/2012 006459 S.B. COUNTY CLERK OF THE BOARD 05092012 Notice of Determination filing
10-370-210-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
68084 5/22/2012 006557 S.B. COUNTY DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS FC 157/12 4th Qtr NPDES Flood Control Agreement
10-625-220-000-000 6,930.00
21-625-220-000-000 2,970.00
7Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
8
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 9,900.00 68084 5/22/2012 006557 S.B. COUNTY DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS
68085 5/22/2012 006510 S.B. COUNTY INFORMATION 13018 March Pager Access
10-175-240-000-000 9.00
Total : 9.00
68086 5/22/2012 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 11673 3RD QTR (FY 11/12)
10-410-220-000-000 17,544.70
10-410-250-000-000 3,068.10
11774 May Law Enforcement Services
10-410-255-000-000 3,740.00
10-410-256-000-000 123,475.33
14-411-256-000-000 8,333.00
Total : 156,161.13
68087 5/22/2012 006521 S.B. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH IN0166542 Backflow Testing/Certification for
10-172-220-000-000 165.00
Total : 165.00
68088 5/22/2012 006681 SMART & FINAL Store 318 Trans132SCHOOL AGE SUPPLIES~
10-440-223-000-000 98.74
Total : 98.74
68089 5/22/2012 007005 SO CAL LOCKSMITH 19241 Key
10-195-245-000-000 12.12
19266 Keys
10-172-210-000-000 2.42
Total : 14.54
68090 5/22/2012 006695 SO.CA.ASS'N OF GOVERNMENT 04112012 2012-13 Annual Due Assessment Fee
10-190-265-000-000 1,278.00
Total : 1,278.00
68091 5/22/2012 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A.205012246 C. CARE/SCHOOL AGE FOOD & KIT. SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 688.89
Total : 688.89
68092 5/22/2012 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1192 Feb/Mar Traffic Eng Services
8Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
9
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
68092 5/22/2012 (Continued)007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
10-175-250-000-000 3,418.80
Total : 3,418.80
68093 5/22/2012 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 420120288 Tickets for April 2012
16-900-220-000-000 42.00
Total : 42.00
68094 5/22/2012 007843 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 79265 Tree Trimming - Britton Way
10-450-246-000-000 405.00
Total : 405.00
68095 5/22/2012 007920 WILLDAN 002-12186 Engineering Services
10-175-255-000-000 3,170.00
00411266 Walgreen Public Works Inspections
10-175-255-000-000 2,042.50
02-12185 Plan Check & Inspection Services
10-172-250-000-000 3,187.50
Total : 8,400.00
68096 5/22/2012 010864 WIRZ, MATT 05082012 Gym Key Reimbursement
23-301-76-00 10.00
Total : 10.00
68097 5/22/2012 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 061442784 APRIL COPIER LEASE WC5755A
10-190-700-000-000 305.27
Total : 305.27
68098 5/22/2012 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 061442783 APRIL COPIER LEASE CC265 COPIER
10-190-700-000-000 291.63
Total : 291.63
68099 5/22/2012 010697 ZIONS BANK 0010053988684339001HVAC Loan Semiannually 6/1/12
10-195-257-000-000 14,409.50
Total : 14,409.50
Bank total : 238,874.38 64 Vouchers for bank code :bofa
9Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
05/15/2012
Voucher List
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
10
9:33:54AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
238,874.38Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 64
10Page:
3.C.a
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
v
o
u
c
h
e
r
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
1
0
5
1
:
C
h
e
c
k
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
N
o
.
0
5
-
2
2
-
2
0
1
2
)
City of Grand Terrace
Warrant Register Index
FD No.Fund Name Dept No.Department Name General Account Numbers
10 GENERAL FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIES/WAGES
11 STREET FUND 120 CITY MANAGER 139 EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT PLAN
12 STORM DRAIN FUND 125 CITY CLERK 140 RETIREMENT
13 PARK FUND 140 FINANCE 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE
14 AB 3229 COPS FUND 160 CITY ATTORNEY 143 WORKERS' COMPENSATION
15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 172 BUILDING & SAFETY 138/141 MEDICARE / SUI
16 GAS TAX FUND 175 PUBLIC WORKS 210 OFFICE EXPENSE
17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND/ TDA FUND 180 COMMUNITY EVENTS 218-219 NON-CAPITAL FURN/SMALL TOOLS
19 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP
20 MEASURE I FUND 190 GENERAL GOVERNMENT (NON-DEPT) 230 ADVERTISING
21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 195 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 235 COMMUNICATIONS
22 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 370 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEV 238-239 UTILITIES
26 LSCPG/ LGHTG ASSESSMENT DIST. 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 240-242 RENTS & LEASES
44 BIKE LANE CAPITAL FUND 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 245-246 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT
46 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 430 RECREATION SERVICES 250-251 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
47 BARTON RD. BRIDGE PROJECT 440 CHILD CARE 255-256 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
32 CRA-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 260 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS
33 CRA-DEBT SERVICE FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 265 MEMBERSHIPS & DUES
34 CRA-LOW & MOD HOUSING 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 268 TRAINING
802 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 270 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MTGS
804 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM. 272 FUEL & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
807 PARKS & REC COMMITTEE 33-300 DEBT SERVICE
808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV (NO CIP)
700 COMPUTER-RELATED
701 VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT
3.
C
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
1
Attachment: Warrant Register Account Index (1051 : Check Register No. 05-22-2012)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
April 9, 2012
The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular meeting at the upstairs
Conference Room at City Hall. Meeting was called to order at 4:01 p.m. by Chairperson, Don
Bennett.
MEMBERS PRESENT were Don Bennett. JoAnn Johnson. Pat Smith, Lew Neeb and Robert
Kaplanek.
MEMBERS ABSENT — Manuel Baltierra..
CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT. — Captain, Steve Dorsey, Sheriff's Department..
GUESTS PRESENT — None.
INTRODUCTIONS — Not needed..
AGENDA was approved with motion by Don Bennett and second by Lew Neeb.
MINUTES for the meeting of March 12, 2012 were approved with motion by Robert Kaplanek and
second by Pat Smith.
PUBLIC COMMENT — None.
CORRESPONDENCE — Resignation of new member and Secretary, Phillip Robb was received by
City Clerk, Tracy Martinez. The Committee had no choice but to accept the resignation..
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Crime Report by Captain Dorsey.
a.The Crime Report from March, obtained from crimemapping.com was
discussed. There were 143 calls for service, 61 arrests, 6 vehicle burglaries, 1
identity theft.
b.Town Meeting will be on Wednesday, April 18 in the Community Room at City
Hall. The purpose of the meeting will be to share crime prevention information and
the neighborhood watch program..
c.Neighborhood Watch Meeting will be April 11 th at 6 pm on the front lawn of
22985 Jensen Court. SSS, Sylvia Beasley will be guest speaker.
d.It is hoped that license plate readers will be available for all patrol vehicles fairly
soon.
e.Captain Dorsey will try to come up with weekly and monthly articles for the local
newspapers. He will also try to do some safety training of children.
f.City Council has voted to cut regular Sheriff's Service Specialist. However, Grand
Terrace is sharing SSS Sylvia Beasley with Loma Linda.
3.D
Packet Pg. 92
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
C
r
i
m
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
9
,
2
0
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
g. Coming up soon at City Council will be a proposal to have a Paramedic/Fire
Fighter assigned to Grand Terrace in place of a regular Fire Fighter. The proposal
could include raising approximately $50,000 for equipment and supplies for the
Paramedic position. This would be a one-time expense.
B. Crime Prevention Citizen's Awareness booklet
a.Lew Neeb had given Captain Dorsey a copy of booklet. Captain Dorsey indicated
that it would be quite expensive to have the booklet printed. Will probably opt to
have articles printed each week or month in local papers..
b.He also indicated that many flyers and brochures are available in the SSS's office
as well as at the Sheriff's Department.
c.The request to the City Council to revise the Statement of Purpose and
Responsibilities of the Crime Prevention Committee has not been acted on at this
time.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Crime Prevention Planning
a.Refer to items mentioned above.
b.Continuing quest for Committee Secretary.
B. Other Community Programs
a. Song and Dance Lady Jacqi Bowe appearing at the Senior Center this Friday.
C. Member Reports
ADJOURNMENT - There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 4:40
P.m.
Temporary Acting Secretary,
Next Crime Prevention Meeting, May 14 2012 4:00 pm at City Hall
3.D
Packet Pg. 93
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
C
r
i
m
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
9
,
2
0
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ACTIVIATIES COMMITTEE
Minutes of April 2' 2012
The meeting was called to order at 7:15p.m. by Chair Pauline Grant. Those present were
Pauline Grant, Ann Petta, Frances Carter, Masako Gifford, Martha Monteon, Michelle
Rosenkild, Peggy Reagan and City Clerk, Tracy Martinez.
Secretary's Report: The minutes for March 5 th were read and Pauline moved the minutes be
approved. Seconded. Motion carried.
Treasurer's Report: The report reflected a balance of $883.61 and petty cash balance of
$166.72.
Historical Report: Ann asked for suggestions for this years' group to be honored and be
responsible for glass display case. Ann suggested the Girl Scouts since this was the 100 year
celebration for the Girl Scouts. All agreed. Ann will follow-up on contacting scout leaders.
Art Show: There were no applications at this time but several artist had expressed interested.
Ann had contacted 26 possible artists.
Tracy said the insurance for the art show would be $189.37. All agreed that the insurance was
reasonable and committed to furnishing homemade goodies.
Shelly mentioned we were unable to find sandwich board last year and hoped that would be
located for this years' show. Many people driving by would see sign and attend. It was
suggested the advertizing begin on the Reader Board two weeks prior to show.
Shelly will bring music and ballons. Frances will bring supplies for punch and a table. Masako
and Peggy will distribute flyers a week or so prior to show. Members were asked to set up
Saturday 12:34 to 4:00p and return at 7:00 to 9:00 for those artists who could not bring display
earlier. Sunday hours are: 11:30 to 5:00p.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m. The next meeting is scheduled for May 7th.
Respectfully submitted
e 19
Peggy Reagan, Secretary
3.E
Packet Pg. 94
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
2
,
2
0
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
e
n
t
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
December 6, 2011
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by Matt
Wirz, liaison with City of Grand Terrace at 6:00 p.m. Agendas and minutes were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT — Vic Pfennighausen, Lew Neeb, Pete Parsons and JoAnn Johnson.
MEMBERS ABSENT — Sue Taylor, Jim Vert and Hanni Bennett.
CITY STAFF — Matt Wirz
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS — James Mejia, Winifred Horspool and Eileen Young.
a.James Mejia outlined extensive training and experience that would be very helpful in the
Emergency Operations Center.
b.Eileen Young also has had considerable experience in setting up for emergencies on a
somewhat smaller scale and the willingness to take training.
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS — None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA was approved by Lew Neeb and seconded by JoAnn Johnson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of October 4, 2011 with motion by Lew Neeb and second by JoAnn
Johnson. Approval of minutes of November 1, 2011 with motion by Vic Pfennighausen and second
by Lew Neeb.
LIAISON REPORT — by Matt Wirz.
a.City events coming up, City Birthday Party will be held on December13 th with City
Council to follow at 7:30. Denis Kidd and Ralph Salisbury from Friends of Blue Mountain
will be featured speakers. Friends of Blue Mountain are being featured in the display case in
the lobby of City Hall.
b.City Budget for EOC is reasonably good with approximately $440 in office expenses and
approximately $3000 left in the CERT budget. EOC will request approximately $1000 from
CERT for generator repair. All other accounts are covered, but the end of the fiscal year it
will be close.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
a. Radio
i.AM 1640 working well and reportedly the very best of its kind in the area.. Vic
has received the back-up transmitter and will test it out in the next few days.
ii.MURS/Ham Radios all working well. Have not ordered batteries for ham radios.
MURS radios are always ready to go in case of an emergency.
3.F
Packet Pg. 95
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
Ann John Acting Secretary
b.Working Mondays
Vic always works Mondays from 1 p.m. to ??. He requested that if Eileen Young
joins the Committee, perhaps she could come on Monday afternoons and might want
to become familiar with the AM Radio under the instructions of Pete Parsons and to
possibly fill in when Pete Parsons is away. Eileen indicated that she would be willing
to do that and did wish to join the EOC.
c.Items for purchase/Recommendations. Vic will be purchasing oil and filters for the
generator.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a.Search for Chairperson continues.
b.Two vacant voting positions need to be filled plus 2 alternates.
i.Application was received by the City Clerk from Eileen Young. Eileen indicated
the wish to have her application considered for an Alternate position. Motion was
made by JoAnn Johnson to accept Eileen and seconded by Lew Neeb. Vote was
unanimous for acceptance.
ii.Application was presented to committee by James Mejia who wished to be
considered for a Voting position. Motion was made to accept by JoAnn Johnson and
seconded by Lew Neeb. Vote was unanimous for acceptance.
iii.Action item will be sent to City Council requesting acceptance of both applicants.
Also, application of James Mejia will be delivered to City Clerk.
NEW BUSINESS None.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS — Nothing planned at this time.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:54 p.m.
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2012 AT 6 P.M.
3.F
Packet Pg. 96
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
January 3, 2012
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by Matt
Wirz, liaison with City of Grand Terrace at 6:00 p.m. Agendas and minutes were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT — Vic Pfennighausen, Lew Neeb, Sue Taylor, Hanni Bennett, James Mejia,
Eileen Young, and JoAnn Johnson.
MEMBERS ABSENT — Jim Vert, and Pete Parsons.
CITY STAFF — Matt Wirz
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS — Winifred Horspool was introduced.
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS — None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA for January 3, 2012 - with a motion by Lew Neeb and second by
Hanni Bennett, the motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 6, 2011 with motion by Lew Neeb and second by Sue
Taylor, the motion carried.
LIAISON REPORT — by Matt Wirz.
A.City Events- Matt reported that there were no city events to report and that he would
provide details for the March 10th Walk Up Blue Mountain at the February meeting. He
did mention that they will need volunteers from the EOC and CERT as well as radios.
Matt will talk to the City Departments and to the Friends of Blue Mountain.
B.City Budget- The State of California is doing away with Redevelopment Funds for all
counties. The City Council should have an update on the impact to the city at either the
January 10th or January 24th meeting. A large number of the staff is partially funded by
the re-development funds.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
A. Radios-
i.AM 1640- Not too busy during the holidays. The new backup transmitter is ready
to be put in service and Vic will monitor it. Vic has ordered 2 backup batteries for
the H.T. Ham radios.
ii.MURS/Ham Radios-Vic has been conditioning them on schedule. He is concerned
about the CERT radios, as they are responsible for maintaining their own. There
should be a standard net to check on all radios i.e. Roll call.
3.F
Packet Pg. 97
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
B.Working Mondays-Any Monday from 1:00 on for anyone available to work. Vic thanked
Eileen for coming in to work.
C.Items for purchase/Recommendations-
i.Vic asked Matt to talk to the City Manager about the work order to repair the
voltage regulator on the generator. Johnson repaired it, but it did not work. He then
called Tim's Mobile Repair to service it and found the problem to be the wrong
regulator had been installed by Johnson. Tim's installed the correct one and it is
now working as it should. Vic would like to try to request the money we paid to
Johnson be returned, as it was in error. We have not yet received a bill from Tim's
Mobile.
ii. Matt is working on a purchase order for oil filters and oil for the diesel generator.
D.Matt suggested that item D be added to the agenda for EOC special budget.
E.EOC line item balances- see attached page.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS- by Matt Wirz
A.Search for Chairperson continues.
B.Two vacant positions are available. One voting and one alternate.
NEW BUSINESS —by Matt Wirz
A.The new members need a copy of the Emergency Operation Procedures (EOPs).
B.The EOPs need to be updated. Funds have been requested for a consultant to assist with
the update. A section addressing disability needs has to be added.
C.Due to the EOC budget shortfall, JoAnn moved that we request CERT to transfer $1,000
to the EOC and any unused funds will be returned to CERT by April 2012.
D.Lew asked how much money from property tax funds paid by Grand Terrace residents
goes to the Flood Control Zone 2 and 3. Are the areas being maintained i.e. weeded.
Matt will talk to Berry to see if any projects have been done recently.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS — by Matt Wirz
Matt will try to set up a schedule for training offered by the County and find out if our
members will be able to attend. A Training and Exercise Plan needs to be developed for the
next three years.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
tr-•
Sue Taylor, Secretary
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, February 7, 2012 AT 6 P.M.
3.F
Packet Pg. 98
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
March 6, 2012
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by Matt
Wirz, liaison with City of Grand Terrace at 6:00 p.m. Agendas and minutes were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT —Sue Taylor, Hanni Bennett, James Mejia, and JoAnn Johnson.
MEMBERS ABSENT — Vic Pfennighausen, Lew Neeb, Eileen Young and Pete Parsons.
CITY STAFF — N/A
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS — None
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS — None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA for March 6, 2012 - with a motion by JoAnn Johnson and second by,
Hanni Bennett, the motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES for February 7, 2012-with motion by James Mejia and second by
JoAnn Johnson, the motion carried.
LIAISON REPORT — by Matt Wirz
A.City Events- The Blue Mountain Walk is scheduled for March 10 61, 2012. Vic will
Set up the table and chairs and tent on Friday evening and will provide radios. Pete
Parsons will be there to answer questions about the radio. JoAnn Johnson donated the
funds to pay for the porta-potties. Tee shirts will be available for $15.00 and a 9:30 a.m.
church service will be held at the top by the Azure Hills Church.
B.City Budget- A draft is being prepared for the 12/13 budget.
C.EOC Budget- The $1,000 transfer for the CERT budget has not been posted as of today.
D.Matt announced that Denise Benson, head of the San Bernardino County OES has retired
and the position is open at this time.
E.On 5/24 County Fire will conduct an audit on the 2004-2009 fiscal years Homeland
Security Grant.
F.The city applied for the Emergency Management Program Grant to help fund Matt's
position; however they want more information from the city as well as any matching
funds. Due to lack of staff time to prepare the information, the city will forfeit the funds
this year.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
A. Radios-
i.AM 1640- The radio is operating well. The new backup transmitter is in
service.
ii.MURS/Ham Radios- Nothing to report.
B. Working Mondays-Any Monday from 1:00 on for anyone available to work
3.F
Packet Pg. 99
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
Sue Taylor, Secretary
C.Items for purchase/Recommendations-
i.Vic reported that we need to purchase and air filter for the EOC building air
conditioner.
ii.Vic has built a load test for the generator with a 20 KW capacity. He needs a few
more parts to complete the project for an estimated amount of $200.00.
iii.The EOC members discussed the possibility of not spending any unnecessary
funds and any money left over could go into the Fire Medic Program for the city.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS- by Matt Wirz
A.Search for Chairperson continues.
B.Two vacant positions are available. One voting and one alternate.
NEW BUSINESS —by JoAnn Johnson
A. Carolyn has submitted an application for the EOC Committee as an alternate and will be
able to work a day or two a week with Pete on the radio.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS — by JoAnn Johnson
There was discussion about possible Town Hall meetings to get the information out to
residents and articles in the Blue Mountain or City News.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, April 2, 2012 AT 6 P.M.
3.F
Packet Pg. 100
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
April 3, 2012
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by Vice
Chairperson, JoAnn Johnson at 6:02 p.m. Agendas and minutes were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT — Vic Pfennighausen, Lew Neeb, JoAnn Johnson and James Mejia...
MEMBERS ABSENT — Sue Taylor, Jim Vert Eileen Young and Hanni Bennett.
CITY STAFF — None
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS — Sandy Luckman. .
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS — None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA was approved by Lew Neeb and seconded by Vic Pfennighausen with
the change of the date from April 2 to April 3...
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 6 (year changed from 2011 to 2012) with motion by James
Mejia and second by Lew Neeb.
LIAISON REPORT — by Vic Pfennighausen
CITY EVENTS
a.Blue Mountain Walk/Hike was very successful with about 1100 hikers participating. The
weather couldn't have been better.
b.Community Days will be June 9th and EOC will he participating with MURS radios
CITY BUDGET
a.According to new budget printout, CERT has $2000 and used $1000 to pay for generator
repair.
b.We will need to buy fuel to top of diesel tank. Will also need to purchase some gasoline.
c.Will need to purchase a new EZ-Up type of shelter. Will check out Walmart and/or
Harbor Freight.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfcnnighausen
a. Radio
i.AM 1640 working well. Carolyn LaMatry is able to change the stick while Pete is
on vacation. Eileen Young is also on vacation.
ii.MURS/Ham Radios all working well and were very helpful on the Blue Mountain
event..
3.F
Packet Pg. 101
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
b.Vic always works Mondays ::rom 1 p.m. to 3 or 4. He has been working on a Load Center
to test the generators.
c.Items for purchase/Recommendations. Vic will he purchasing oil and filters for the
generator.
d.We have approximately $25D0 left in our budget. Will probably buy some food and water and should have about $500 lef at the end of the fiscal year.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a.Search for Chairperson continues. Some discussion on approaching Rich Houbert..
b.One vacant voting position need to be filled plus 1 alternate.
NEW BUSINESS — None.
MEMBER COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
a. James Mejia reported on the web site Grand Terrace CERT which includes some very
impressive photographs taken f:om 'the top of Blue Mountain during the recent hike.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS — Nothing planned at this time.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:34 p.m.
JoAnn John', Acting Secretary
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2012 AT 6 P.M.
3.F
Packet Pg. 102
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
A
c
c
e
p
t
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
6
,
2
0
1
1
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
1
2
,
M
a
r
c
h
6
,
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
A
p
r
i
l
3
,
2
0
1
2
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council Item
TITLE:General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zoning Change 12-01 and
Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:Conduct a public hearing and vote to take the following
actions: (1) Adopt a negative declaration; (2) adopt the
Resolution adopting General Plan Amendment 12-01, and
(3) approve the first reading of an Ordinance adopting Zone
Change 12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01.
BACKGROUND:
On April 27, 2010, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update of the General
Plan, including the Housing Element. The Housing Element contains a number of
housing programs that identify amendments to the City’s General Plan and Zoning
Code, and which the City indicated would be completed by the time the next Housing
Element cycle begins on October 1, 2013.
In December 2011, and January and February of 2012 the Planning Commission
conducted public workshops to discuss the changes that would be needed to effectuate
the revisions contemplated in the adopted housing programs. In addition to textual
changes to the Zoning Code and General Plan, mapping changes to the General Plan
Land Use Map and Zoning Map to re-zone two separates sites (referred to as Project
Site A and Project Site B, respectively) currently zoned for multiple family uses, to a
higher density of 20 units per acre would be required. A complete list depicting the
changes to the General Plan, General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map and Zoning
Code is provided in Attachment 1 (adopted PC Reso); a discussion is also provided
below.
Additionally, the Planned Residential Development Ordinance adopted on January 24,
2012, included, provisions to allow for density bonuses, and the General Plan
Amendment also includes revisions to reflect these density bonus provisions.
On April 5, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
amendments, and received testimony in opposition of the re-zoning of Project Site B.
The Planning Commission voted 4-0 tabling the rezoning of Project Site B, and adopting
a resolution recommending adoption of General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zone Change
12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01. The adopted Planning Commission
resolution identifying the revisions (Attachment 1) and the Planning Commission
minutes (Attachment 2) are included.
6.A
Packet Pg. 103
A City Council Resolution for the adoption of General Plan Amendment 12-01 and an
Ordinance for the adoption of Zone Change 12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
are attached as Attachments 3 and 4, respectively, for the Council's consideration.
DISCUSSION:
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change
A component of the Housing Element included a land inventory to determine that the
City has adequate residentially-zoned land to accommodate our share of the Regional
Housing Need Assessment (RHNA). Based on the inventory, the City could
accommodate all but 27 dwelling units. In order to accommodate the housing need for
27 units affordable to lower-income households, Program 8.8.1.s requires the City to re-
zone at least 1.35 acres of vacant land, at a minimum density of 20 units per acre. Two
sites totaling 2.52 acres were identified in the Housing Element for the re-zoning: 11695
Canal Street (Site A), and at the northwest corner of Van Buren Street and the Gage
Canal (Site B). No development is proposed in conjunction with the re-zoning.
The original proposal was to amend the Land Use Map to re-designate the two sites on
the Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential (MDR 6-12 du/ac) to Medium/High
Density Residential (MHDR 20 du/ac); and re-zone the sites on the Zoning Map from
R3-Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) to a new R3-20 High Density Residential
district that would allow a density of 20 du/ac. Six members of the public spoke in
opposition to the rezoning of Site B, and two opposition emails were received
(Attachment 5). Additionally, Mr. and Mrs. Rolland came to the public counter and
expressed their opposition. Concerns were expressed related to increase in density,
traffic, pedestrian safety, noise, and potential for apartments to be constructed.
Ultimately, the Commission’s action included the tabling of the re-zoning for Project Site
B with the caveat that any re-zoning proposal would need to be accompanied by a
development application. The Commission recommended rezoning of Project Site A.
Table 2.3 of the General Plan identifies the MHDR designation as reserved for
affordable housing projects with a specific plan. This Table is proposed to be amended
to state that the MHDR designation is reserved for multiple family development with an
emphasis on affordable housing projects, and also to provide for density bonuses
associated with a planned residential development. For internal consistency, two other
tables in the Element are also proposed to be amended, which reflect land use
acreages and build-out calculations.
Zoning Code Amendment
The Housing Element's housing programs that call for code changes are shown below,
with a brief description of the proposed changes to the Zoning Code.
Program 8.8.1.c: The City’s CEDD will implement a Zoning Code amendment to revise
Chapter 18.10 to ensure the permitted uses table allows for manufactured housing in all
6.A
Packet Pg. 104
residential zones, in accordance with State law.
Discussion: Revision to Table 18.10.030, Chapter 18.10 Residential Zones, as
specified above. A revision to Chapter 18.66 Manufactured Units regulating the
use of manufactured homes in residential zones and commercial modular units in
the MR and M2 zones.
Program 8.8.1.d: The City’s CEDD will amend its density bonus provisions in
accordance with the requirements of State density bonus law.
Discussion: Revision of Footnote “c” of Table 18.10.040, Chapter 18.10
Residential Zones to reference the California Government Code relating to
density bonuses.
Program 8.8.1.m: The City’s CEDD will amend the Zoning Code to permit emergency
shelters in the Industrial zone district without a conditional use permit, and subject to the
same development and management standards that apply to the residential or
commercial uses within the same zone district.
Discussion: Amend Chapter 18.40 (M2 Industrial District) to add emergency
shelters as a permitted use in the M2 zone. A new Chapter 18.78 (Emergency
Shelters) that establishes development and operational requirements, such as
property maintenance and onsite management, and limits the number of beds to
25.
Program 8.8.1.o: The City’s CEDD will amend its Zoning Code to eliminate
requirements for a conditional use permit for detached second units, and to reflect
administrative review of second units, in accordance with state law.
Discussion: Table 18.10.030 of Chapter 18.10 Residential Zones and Chapter
18.69 Second Family Units have been revised to show that second units are
subject to Administrative Site and Architectural Review. Also, the standards for
second family units have been updated to require, but are not limited to,
minimum lot size, building separation and height limitations for second units.
Program 8.8.1.p: The CEDD will amend its Zoning Code to define transitional and
supportive housing as residential uses subject only to those restrictions that apply to
other residential uses of the same type in the same zone; and to identify the zone
districts in which single room occupancy housing units will be permitted, in accordance
with state law.
Discussion: There are several types of residential care facilities that house six or
less persons that are licensed and regulated by the State of California. These
include, but not limited to, physically handicapped, mentally impaired, the elderly,
and neglected or abused children. State law preempts local zoning controls over
licensed residential care facilities. If a licensed facility serves six or fewer persons
6.A
Packet Pg. 105
(this does not count the caregivers), the law states this is a residential use and
therefore, cannot be treated any differently than any other single family living
situation. Therefore, where such a use (6 persons or less) is both licensed and
regulated by the State, the use will be permitted by right.
This preemption does not exist if a licensed facility serves more than six people.
In these instances, staff is recommending that such facilities (7 or more persons)
be conditionally permitted in the R2 and R3 zones, only. In addition to the CUP,
a new Chapter 18.82 (Standards for Specified Land Uses and Activities) is
proposed, which would establish standards for licensed residential care facilities
serving 7 or more persons, such as a client profile, separation from similar uses,
walls, parking, and lighting.
Any non-licensed (by the State) use is considered a rooming and boarding house
and is subject to the City’s existing provisions contained in Chapter 18.67
Rooming and Boarding Houses. This Chapter regulates parolee-probationer
homes, and limits the number of occupants to no more than six.
Definitions for transitional, supportive, and single room occupancy housing are
also proposed.
Program 8.8.1.q: The CEDD will amend its Zoning Code to update the definition of
multiple family residential in order to remove the bedroom limitations, and to revisit the
parking requirements for smaller units.
Discussion: Table 18.10.030 of Chapter 18.10 Residential Zones has been
revised to delete the bedroom limitations. The current Code requires two
parking spaces per unit, and the revision proposes a sliding scale so that one
parking space is required for a studio or efficiency unit, two parking spaces for a
one, two or three bedroom unit, and three parking spaces for units with four or
more bedrooms.
Program 8.8.1.r: The CEDD will amend Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code to clarify the
scope and authority of the Site and Architectural Review Board.
Discussion: An introductory paragraph to Section 18.63.030 (Scope) of Chapter
18.63 Site and Architectural Review is proposed that makes this clarification.
Program 8.8.1.s: To accommodate the housing need for the remaining 27 units
affordable to lower-income households, the City will rezone at least 1.35 acres of vacant
land, at a minimum density of 20 units per acre.
Discussion: In addition to amending the General Plan Land Use and Zoning
Maps, as discussed above, a new zoning district is required. The Residential
Chapter of the Zoning Code is proposed to be amended to create a new R3-20
(High Density Residential) district, including development standards for the new
R3-20 zone. The proposed development standards are identical to the existing
6.A
Packet Pg. 106
R3 zone district, the only difference is density. The R3-20 district would allow 20
dwelling units per acre.
Program 8.8.3.l:The City shall amend its Zoning Code to establish a reasonable
accommodation process for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with
supportive services for persons with disabilities.
Discussion: A new chapter, Chapter 18.68 Reasonable Accommodations is
proposed, which establishes the procedure for such requests. A reasonable
accommodation request could include the need for an access ramp within a
setback, or even a building encroachment so that a fully accessible room could
be constructed for a disabled person, subject to a $50 land use application,
instead of a variance application.
Environmental Review
An Initial Study was prepared for the project in accordance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to determine the Project’s potential
impacts. The Initial Study determined that the project will not have an adverse impact
on the environment and a Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared. The documents
were made available for public review from March 8th to March 28th, 2012. Attachment
6 contains a copy of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the Council's
consideration.
Staff received a comment letter from the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Their letter and staff response is included in Attachment 7, which was considered by the
Planning Commission during the April 5th public hearing.
Notice
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Grand Terrace City News on April 12,
2012, and posted in three public places. In addition, direct mailing to property owners
within 300 feet of Project Site A and B were also provided
FISCAL IMPACT:
Implementation of the legislative changes will not create a fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
·1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03
·2. Adopted April 5, 2012 PC Minutes
·3. City Council GPA Resolution
·4. Ordinance (Zone Change/Zoning Code Amendment)
·5. Opposition Emails
·6. Neg Dec -Initial Study
6.A
Packet Pg. 107
·7. AQMD Response Memo
APPROVALS:
Joyce Powers Completed 05/09/2012 5:31 PM
Finance Completed 05/10/2012 9:16 AM
City Attorney Completed 05/10/2012 10:58 AM
Community & Economic Development Skipped 05/10/2012 5:25 PM
Community & Economic Development Skipped 05/10/2012 5:25 PM
City Manager Completed 05/15/2012 2:40 PM
City Council Pending
6.A
Packet Pg. 108
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 2 of 35
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zone Change 12-01, and Zoning
Code Amendment 12-01 at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795
Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date;
and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Grand Terrace:
1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public
hearing, and substantial evidence in the record, General Plan Amendment 12-01,
Zone Change 12-01, and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01 will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
2. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to General Plan
Amendment 12-01:
a. The General Plan Amendment promotes the Grand Terrace General Plan
and each element thereof, and leaves the General Plan a compatible,
integrated and internally consistent statement of goals and policies. The
amendment implements several Housing Element Programs (Programs
8.8.1.c, d, m, o through r and 8.8.3.l); and it fulfills Housing Policies 8.1.1
and 8.1.3 to promote and encourage development of housing, which
varies by type, design, form of ownership and size and to encourage infill
housing development and more intensive use of underutilized land for
residential construction.
b. The amendment promotes Land Use Goal 2.1 to provide for balanced
growth which seeks to provide a wide range of employment and housing
opportunities and maintenance of a healthy, diversified community; and
Sustainable Development Policy 9.3.1.a to review the Zoning Code to
promote green building concepts into all development projects including
possible incentives for the expanded use of green building concepts.
c. Adoption of this General Plan Amendment will not be in conflict with
Section 65358(b) of the Government Code relating to the number of
amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the first
amendment of calendar year 2012.
3. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Zone Change 12-01
and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01:
a. The proposed zone change and amendment will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 4 of 35
Exhibit 1
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IS PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED TO RE-ZONE THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTIES FROM R3-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A NEW
R3-20-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE MAP IS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED TO REDESIGNATE THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTIES FROM MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO
MHDR (MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, ON THE TWO SITES SHOWN:
Figure 1: Project Site A (Approx. 0.81 acres)
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 5 of 35
TABLE 2.2 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE
REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
Table 2.2
General Plan Acreage By Land Use Category
Land Use Category Acres % of Total
Hillside Low Density Residential 125 5.5%
Low Density Residential 885.2 39.2%
Medium Density Residential 184.9185.7 8.2%
Medium High Density Residential 6.86.0 0.34%
General Commercial 88.4 3.9%
Office Commercial 32.9 1.5%
Light Industrial 107 4.7%
Floodplain Industrial 40.1 1.71%
Hillside Open Space 189.1 8.0%
Mixed Use 93.5 4.2%
Public 158.9 7.0%
Streets 353.00 15.5%
Total 2,255.1 100.00%
TABLE 2.3 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE
REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
Table 2.3
City of Grand Terrace
General Plan Land Use Designations
Land Use Designation Purpose of Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Density Range – 6 to 12
dwelling units per gross acre.
The Medium Density Residential designation include both single
family detached and multiple family attached developments.
Permitted uses within these areas may include small lot single
family developments or attached multi-family developments
including townhomes, condominiums, and apartments. Mobile
home developments are also permitted.
A density bonus may be applied to a project pursuant to the density
bonus provisions of Chapter 4.3 of the California Government
Code, or pursuant to an approved Planned Residential Development
application for up to a 20% density bonus may be granted.
Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR)
Maximum Density - 20 dwelling
units per gross acre
The Medium High Density Residential designation is reserved for
multiple family development, with an emphasis on affordable
housing projects. Any project proposed for the MHDR designation
shall be required to submit a Specific Plan that provides detailed
information regarding the design and benefits of the proposed
project that warrants the density range of the MHDR designation.
A density bonus may be applied to a project pursuant to the density
bonus provisions of Chapter 4.3 of the California Government
Code, or pursuant to an approved Planned Residential Development
application for up to a 20% density bonus may be granted.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 6 of 35
TABLE 2.4 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE
REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
Table 2.4
Residential Buildout Calculations
Land Use Designation Probable Avg.
Density Acres Dwelling
Units
Persons /
Household
Estimated
Population
Low Density/Hillside 0.7 du/ac 155.3 109 2.83 308
Low Density 3.6 du/ac 885.2 3,187 2.83 9,019
Medium Density 11 du/ac 184.9185.7 2,0342,043 2.83 5,7565,781
Medium High Density 20 du/ac 6.86.0 136120 1.20/2.83+ 189144+
Mixed Use 12 du/ac 14.6*175 2.83 495
Total 1,246.8 5,6415,634 15,76715,747
*Assumes that 15% of the mixed use area is residential.
+Includes existing senior housing in persons per household and estimated population
calculations.
REVISE CHAPTER 18.06 (DEFINITIONS) OF TITLE 18 AS FOLLOWS:
New Definition: Section 18.06.287 – Emergency Shelter
“Emergency Shelter” means a residential facility, other than a community care facility,
operated by a provider that provides temporary accommodations to homeless persons.
The term “temporary accommodations” means that a person will be allowed to reside at
the shelter for a time period not to exceed six months. For purposes of this definition, a
“provider” shall mean a government agency or private non-profit organization which
provides or contracts with recognized community organizations to provide emergency or
temporary shelter, and which may also provide meals, counseling and other services, as
well as common areas for residents of the facility. Such a facility may have individual
rooms, but it is not developed with individual dwelling units, with the exception of the
manager’s unit.
Revise Definition: Section 18.06.635 – Residential Care Facility
“Residential care facility” means any facility place or building that is maintained and
operated to provide non-medical residential care as defined by State law, including, but
not limited to, the physically handicapped, mentally impaired, incompetent persons,
abused or neglected children and the elderly. The term “residential care facility” is limited
to those facilities, places or buildings that are both subject to regulation and actually
licensed by the State of California. No facility, place or building that may otherwise be
regulated by the State of California, but which is not actually licensed by the State of
California, shall be deemed a “residential care facility” for purposes of this Title. Whether
or not unrelated persons are living together, a residential, community or group care facility
licensed by the State of California that serves six or fewer persons shall be considered a
residential use of property for the purposes of this Title. (A residential care facility that is
not licensed by the State of California shall be deemed a rooming or boarding house.)
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 7 of 35
Residential Care
"Residential care" means a service provided at a residence consisting of supervision of
children, adolescents or adults who are not members of the same family as the person(s)
providing the supervision. For the purposes of this definition, those children supervised
pursuant to a foster care agreement, whether written or oral, between the person(s)
providing supervision and a private or public agency, shall not be considered members of
the same family as the person(s) providing supervision.
New Definition: Section 18.06.856 – Single Room Occupancy
“Single Room Occupancy (SRO)” means a residential facility where individuals secure
rooms, of a smaller size than normally found in multiple family dwellings, and which are
rented to a one or two-person household. SRO’s living units are provided for a weekly or
monthly period of time, in exchange for an agreed payment of a fixed amount of money or
other compensation based on the period of occupancy.
New Definition: Section 18.06.908 –Supportive Housing
“Supportive Housing” means housing with no limit on the length of stay, that is occupied
by the target population, as defined by Section 50675.14(b)(3) of the Health and Safety
Code, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing
resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or
her ability to live and, when possible work in the community.
New Definition: Section 18.06.927 – Transitional Housing
“Transitional Housing” and “Transitional Housing Development” means building configured
as rental housing development, but operated under program requirements that call for the
termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program
recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six
months.
SECTION 18.09.020 OF CHAPTER 18.09 (DISTRICTS AND MAP) TITLE 18 IS
PROPOSED TO BE REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 18.09.020 Districts Established:
The following zoning districts are established:
RH Hillside Residential District
Rl-20 Very Low Density Single Family Residential District
Rl-10 Low Density Single Family Residential District
Rl-7.2 Single Family Residential District
R2 Low Medium Density Residential District
R3 Medium Density Residential District
R3-S Multiple Family Senior Citizen
R3-20 High Density Residential District
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 8 of 35
CHAPTER 18.10 (RH, R1, R2 AND R3 AND R3-S RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) OF TITLE
18 IS PROPOSED TO BE REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
CHAPTER 18.10
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTSRH, R1, R2 and R3 AND R3-S
Sections:
18.10.010 Purpose
18.10.020 Residential Districts
18.10.030 Use Regulations
18.10.040 Site Development Standards
18.10.050 Off Street Parking
18.10.060 Residential Street Parking
18.10.070 Signs
18.10.080 Site and Architectural Review
Section 18.10.010 Purpose:
The residential zones contained in this Chapter are intended to carry out the goals and
objectives of the Community's General Plan, with respect to residential uses. These goals
and objectives are to be achieved through the following purposes established for the
residential zones:
A. To provide for development in accordance with the General Plan.
B. To promote the most appropriate and efficient use of the land while providing a
variety of housing opportunities to the community.
C. To promote a compatible relationship between residential, commercial and other
types of land uses located in the community.
D. To promote the public health, safety, and welfare through encouraging the
appropriate type and size of development for the community.
E. To manage development with respect to its type, size and location in order to
prevent harmful encroachment of disruptive development into the community's residential
neighborhoods.
Section 18.10.020 Residential Districts:
The following districts are designed to implement the goals and objectives of the
General Plan. Each district contains specific land use regulations and density ranges for
development.
A. RH, Hillside Residential District: This district is intended for very low density single
family residential development with a maximum retention of open space. It is located in the
portions of the City identified in the General Plan's Master Environmental Analysis as
having severe development limitations related to topography and soil conditions. The
maximum density allowed in this district is one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 9 of 35
B. R1-20, Very Low Single Family Residential District: This district is intended for very
low density single family residential use. The minimum lot size is 20,000 square feet with a
maximum density of two (2) dwelling units per gross acre.
C. Rl-10, Low Density Single Family Residential District: This district is intended for
low density single family residential use. The minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet with a
maximum density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre.
D. R1-7.2, Single Family Residential District: This district is intended for single family
residential use. The minimum lot size is 7,200 square feet with a maximum density of five
(5) dwelling units per gross acre.
E. R2, Low Medium Density Residential District: This district is intended for single
family residential use and low density multiple family development. The minimum lot size
is 10,000 square feet with a maximum density of nine (9) dwelling units per gross acre.
F. R3, Medium Density Residential District: This district is intended for medium
density multiple family development. The minimum lot size is 12,000 square feet with a
maximum density of twelve-plus (12+) dwelling units per gross acre.
G. R3-S, Medium Family, Senior Citizen: This district is intended for the development
of senior citizen housing. The maximum density shall not exceed 20 units per acre. The
development standards shall be established through the specific plan process.
H. R3-20, High Density Residential District: This district is intended for higher density
multiple family development, which may include affordable housing. The minimum lot size
is 12,000 square feet with a maximum density of 20 units per acre.
Section 18.10.030 Use Regulations:
Uses listed in Table 18.10.030 shall be allowed in one or more of the residential districts
as indicated in the columns below each district heading. Permitted uses are indicated by
the letter “P” while the letter “C” indicates uses which require a conditional use permit.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 10 of 35
TABLE 18.10.030
Land Use Regulations
Permitted Uses RH R1-20 R1-10 R1-7.2 R2 R3 R3-S R3-20
A. Residential Uses
Single Family (Detached), Full Sized P P P P Pa Pb - -
Single Family (Attached)
(Duplexes, Triplexes, and
Fourplexes consisting of One
(1)Bedroom and/or Two (2) Bedroom
Units Only)
-
-
-
-
P
P
- P
Multiple Family Units
(Planned Unit Developments
consisting of one (1) and/or
Two (2) Bedroom Units Only)
- -
-
-
P
P
- P
Manufactured Housing
(As Permitted Per Chapter 18.66) P- P- P- P P- P- - -
Mobile Home Park - - - - C C - -
Senior Citizen Housing Pd P
B. Residential Accessory Structures
Accessory Structure P P P P P P Pd P
Second Family Unite
(As Permitted Per Chapter 18.6369) PC PC PC PC PC PC - -
Guest House C C C C C C - -
Private Garage P P P P P P - P
Private Swimming Pool P P P P P P Pd P
Home occupation
(As Permitted Per Chapter 5.06) P P P P P P Pd P
Keeping of Cats and Dogs
(Maximum of Two (2) Each) P P P P P P Pd P
Other Accessory Uses
(As Approved by the Planning Director) P P P P P P Pd P
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
1
8
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 11 of 35
C. Other Uses
Churches
(Minimum Three-Acre Parcel) C C C C C C - -
Schools
(Private and Parochial) C C C C C C - -
Public Park and Playground P P P P P P - -
Public Facilities
(And Quasi- Public) C C C C C C - -
Family Day Care Center
(EightSix (8) or Less Children) P P P P P P - -
Family Day Care Center
(NineSeven (9) or More Children) C C C C C C - -
Residential Care Facility
(Six (6) or Less PersonsPatients) P P P P P P - -
Residential Care Facility
(Seven (7) or More PersonsPatients)f C C C C C C - -
Single Room Occupancy C C - -
Transitional Housing, Supportive Housing - - - - C C - -
Utility or Service Facility C C C C C C - -
Outdoor Recreation Facility C C C C C C - -
D. Temporary uses
Temporary Uses
(As approved by Planning Director) P P P P P P Pd P
Temporary Trailers
(As Approved by Planning Director) P P P P P P Pd P
Table 18.10.030 Footnotes
a. A second single family detached unit (full sized single family detached dwelling) shall be permitted in the R2
zone provided that the lot or parcel in question meets the minimum area requirement for the R2 zone and that said
lot or parcel is developed with no more than one single family detached dwelling. A site and architectural review
application for the second family detached unit in accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code shall be
required to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, all development standards of the
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
1
9
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 12 of 35
underlying zone must be adhered to; and any division in ownership among the structures on the lot or parcel in
question shall conform to the subdivision laws of the State and City.
b. A second family detached unit (full sized single family detached dwelling) shall be permitted in the R3 zone provided that the lot
or parcel in question meets the minimum area requirements for the R3 zone and that said lot or parcel is developed with no more
than one single family detached dwelling. A site and architectural review application for the second family detached unit in
accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code shall be required to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. In
addition, all development standards of the underlying zone must be adhered to; and any division in ownership among the structures
on the lot or parcel in question shall conform to the subdivision laws of the State and City.
c. “P” stands for “Permitted Use” where the use is permitted by right; and “C” stands for “Conditional Use” where the use requires a
conditional use permit.
d. Senior citizen housing is allowed in the R3-S zone up to a maximum density of 20 unit/acre. A specific plan will be required for
all senior citizen housing projects in this zone. Some accessory and temporary uses as indicated will be allowed in the R3-S zone
with the approval of the Community and Economic Development Director.
e. Subject to Administrative Site and Architectural Review.
f. Subject to Administrative Conditional Use Permit.
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
2
0
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 13 of 35
Section 18.10.040 Site Development Standards:
The site development standards established for each residential district are as shown in
Table 18.10.040.
TABLE 18.10.040
Site Development Standards
DEVELOPMENT ISSUE RH R1-20 R1-10 R1-7.2 R2 R3 R3-S R3-20
Area (Minimum square feet) _ a 20,000 10,000 7,200 10,000 12,000 g 12,000
Width (Minimum linear feet)
* Interior Lot
* Corner Lot
_ a
_ a
100
100
60
70
60
70
60
70
60
70
g
60
70
Lot Depth (Minimum linear feet) _ a 150 100 100 100 100 g 100
Street Frontage (Minimum linear feet) _ a 50 40 40 40 40 g 40
Setbacks (Minimum linear feet)
Front Yard
Rear Yard
Side Yard
- Interior Lot
With Garage
Without Garage
- Corner Lot
Street side
No Street side
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
25 b
35 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
35 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
10 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
10 b
10 b
15 b
10
g
25 b
20 b
10 b
10 b
15 b
10
Density (Allowable dwelling units per
acre) _ a 1-2 1-4 1-5 1-9 1-12 c Max. 20 13-20c
Living Area (Minimum square feet)
* Single Family
* Duplex, Triplex, Four-plex
and Multiple Family
- One (1) Bedroom
- Two (2) Bedroom
_ a
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
800 d
1,000d
1,350d
800 d
1,000d
g _ g
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
2
1
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 14 of 35
Height (Maximum linear feet) _ a 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e g 35 e
Lot Coverage (Maximum percent) _ a 40 50 50 60 f 60 g 60
Distance Between Buildings
(Minimum linear feet)
_ a
5
5
5
20
20
g 20
Table 18.10.040 Footnotes
a. A specific plan shall be required for all proposed projects (including tentative parcel or tract maps) which include any property
located within this district. Such a specific plan shall establish site development standards on a project by project basis in consideration of
the existing topography and other physical constraints.
The specific plan shall not create a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre and shall be consistent with the City's
General Plan. The specific plan may consider a clustered development concept in order to preserve large areas open space and minimize
the project's impact on the physical environment.
b. The following exceptions apply to front, rear and side yard requirements as noted:
1. The minimum side and rear yard setback for a patio cover shall be five (5) feet.
2. The minimum rear yard setback for an accessory structure shall be ten (10) feet.
3. Slopes exceeding five percent (5%) shall be permitted no closer to a residential structure than a distance equal to the
required side and rear yard setbacks. In the R1-10 District and the R1-20 District, the 35 foot rear yard setback may
include 10 feet of slope that is greater than 5%.
4. In the case of a parcel or tract map, the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback requirement may range from twenty-two
(22) feet to twenty-eight (28) feet, with an average of twenty-five (25) feet for all proposed lots.
5. In the case where an existing legal non-conforming structure is located within a required setback area, the legal non-
conforming structure may be enlarged within the required setback area subject to the following conditions:
a) The proposed addition does not further reduce the depth of the existing setback area; and
b) The proposed addition is located no closer than 5' from any property line.
c. A density bonus shall be permitted in accordance with the California Government Code and this title.Density bonus
1. A density bonus of up to twenty percent (20%) may be approved with a conditional use permit or specific plan if various off-site
improvements which benefit the general public are included in the project.
2. A density bonus of at least twenty-five percent (25%) shall be approved if the proposed project meets the requirements of Chapter
4.2 of the California Government Code regarding "Lower" and "Low or Moderate Income Households” dwelling units.
d. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
2
2
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 15 of 35
1. "Living area" shall be defined as the enclosed area of a residential dwelling unit, excluding porches, patios, carports,
garages, storage areas, or auxiliary rooms.
2. "Multiple Family" shall be defined as one (1) or two (2) bedroom units only.
e. Accessory structures shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height, with exceptions as listed in Section 18.73.090 of this Chapter.
f. Not more than the permitted percent of the total parcel may be devoted to main and accessory structures, parking areas,
driveways and covered patios. The remaining percent of the total parcel shall be devoted to open areas such as landscaping, lawn,
outdoor recreational facilities incidental to residential development, including swimming pools, tennis courts, putting greens, uncovered
patios and walkways. Said open areas shall consist of not less than two hundred (200) square feet of open space per dwelling unit.
g. Senior citizen housing’s development standards will be established through the specific plan process. All senior citizens housing
projects in the R3-S zone will require specific plan process; however, in no circumstances shall the density exceed 20 unit/acre.
6.
A
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
2
3
Attachment: 1. Adopted PC Reso 12-03 (1039 : General Plan Amendment 12-01/Zone Change 12-01/Zoning Code Amendment 12-01)
Page 16 of 35
Section 18.10.050 Off-Street Parking:
The provisions of Chapter 18.60 shall apply in determining the number of parking spaces
that must be provided for each use located in a residential district.
Section 18.10.060 Residential Street Parking:
The provisions of Chapter 10.16 shall apply in all residential districts.
Section 18.10.070 Signs:
The provisions of Chapter 18.80 shall apply in all residential districts.
Section 18.10.080 Site and Architectural Review:
The provisions of Chapter 18.63 shall apply in all residential districts.
SECTION 18.40.020 OF CHAPTER 18.40 (M2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) OF TITLE 18 IS
PROPOSED TO BE REVISED TO ADD EMERGENCY SHELTERS:
Section 18.40.020 Permitted uses:
Permitted uses in the M2 District are as follows:
R. Emergency shelters
SR. Other uses which are determined by the Planning Commission to be similar in
nature to a use listed in this section.
TS. Temporary uses which are determined by the Community and Economic
Development Director not to have a significant long term impact on the environment.
(Uses such as parking lot sales, Christmas tree sales, seasonal sales, rummage
sales, and others with review through the Land Use Approval or Administrative Site
and Architectural approval process in accordance with Chapter 18.63, Site and
Architectural Review.
SECTION 18.60.030.A.2 (PARKING REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 18.60 TITLE 18 IS
PROPOSED TO BE REVISED AS FOLLOWS::
2. Multiple-family dwellings(attached):
a. One parking space for each studio or efficiency unit.
b. Two parking spaces for each one, two or three bedroom unit.
c. Three parking spaces for each four bedroom unit or more.
a. Two parking spaces for each residential unit shall be provided,
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 17 of 35
db. At least one space shall be located within a garage attached to the
main building in which the residential unit is located, and the other within 100 feet of
the unit being served.
ec. Guest parking shall be provided at a ratio of 0.25 spaces for each
residential unit, and shall be rounded up to the next whole number.one space for
every four residential units,
fd. Guest parking:
(i) Shall be identified as "Guest Parking";
(ii) Shall not be used for the storage of recreational vehicles, boats,
trailers or other similar items;
(iii) Shall be located on the same parcel of land as the residential units
and shall be within reasonable walking distance of said units;
(iv) May be uncovered spaces"Open Spaces"; and
(v) May be located on a private street within the site or in a common
parking area.
SECTION 18.63.030 OF CHAPTER 18.63 (SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW) OF
TITLE 18 IS PROPOSED TO BE REVISED BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH
TO THE BEGINNING OF THIS SECTION:
Section 18.63.030 Scope
The responsibility of the Site and Architectural Review Board and/or Director is to provide
comprehensive site plan and architectural review of projects. The scope of the review is to
consider the site plan in relation to the property and development standards (i.e., setbacks,
lot coverage, building height, parking, etc.), placement of structures, vehicle and pedestrian
access, landscaping, police and fire services, grading and drainage, traffic, relationship to
existing and planned uses of adjoining and surrounding properties, and relationship to
nearby properties and structures and surrounding natural topography. It is also to consider
the proposed architecture of buildings in terms of style and design, materials and colors,
and size and bulk in relation to the surrounding properties.
CHAPTER 18.66 (MANUFACTURED HOUSING) OF TITLE 18 IS PROPOSED TO BE
REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
Chapter 18.66
MANUFACTURED HOMES AND COMMERCIAL UNITSHOUSING
Sections:
18.66.010 Purpose
18.66.020 Definition
18.66.030 Permitted locations.
18.66.040 Site development standards
18.66.050 CertificationsHUD certification
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 18 of 35
18.66.060 Building permit
18.66.070 Foundation
18.66.07080 Exterior surface
18.66.08090 Roof design
18.66.090100 Off-street parking
18.66.10010 Mechanical equipment
18.66.11020 Site and architectural review
18.66.12030 Other regulations
18.66.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the placement of manufactured
homesunits in districts zoned for residential development and commercial modular units in
districts zoned for manufacturing or industrial development and to designate certain areas
where the placement of such manufactured units is compatible with surrounding residential
and commercial properties. These regulations are intended to ensure a compatible
integration of manufactured housing with conventionally built units for residential and
business office use.
18.66.020 Definition
“Manufactured home” means a mobile home or manufactured house certified by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and constructed in full compliance
with the National Mobile Home construction and Safety Standards Act intended for
occupancy by a single family installed on a permanent foundation in conformance with
applicable Zoning regulations.
“Commercial modular unit” means a structure transportable in one or more sections,
designed and equipped for human occupancy for industrial, professional, or commercial
purposes, which is required to be moved under permit.
"Manufactured housing" means those structures certified by the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) under the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety
Standards Act as currently amended.
18.66.030 Permitted locations
A. Manufactured homes are a permitted use, as a single family dwelling in the R1, R2
and R3 zoning districts, and within a permitted mobilehome park.
B. Commercial modular units are a conditionally permitted use in the MR-Restricted
Manufacturing (MR) district and M2-Industrial (M2) district as a business office, and
prohibited in all other zones.
Manufactured housing is a permitted use, as a single-family dwelling unit in the R1-7.2
district, and is a conditionally permitted use as a business office unit in the MR and M2
district, prohibited in all other districts except within an approved mobilehome park.
18.66.040 Site development standards
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 19 of 35
A. Site development standards for manufactured homes and modular units shall comply
with the standards of the underlying zone district, and other applicable provisions of the
zoning code.housing shall be the same as those required in Chapter 18.10 for the R1-7.2
district, Chapter 18.39 for the MR (Restricted Manufacturing District) and Chapter 18.40 for
the M2 (Industrial District).
B. The age of the manufactured home or modular unit at the time of installation shall be
ten years or less.
C. A manufactured home or modular unit shall be installed on a permanent foundation.
18.66.050 CertificationsHUD certification
Prior to the installation of a manufactured home or modular unit, all requisite certifications
shall be submitted to the Director of Building and Safety in conjunction with the application
for a building permit.Prior to the placement of a manufactured house on a residential lot or
manufacturing industrial lot, as provided in this title, proof of HUD certification shall be
submitted to the Director of Building and Safety.
18.66.060 Building permit
A building permit issued by the Director of Building and Safety is required for the placement
of a manufactured home or modular unit.ouse on a residential lot and manufacturing or
industrial lot.
18.66.070 Foundation
All manufactured housing shall be placed on a foundation approved by the State
Department of Housing and the city's director of building and safety.
18.66.07080 Exterior surface
A. Manufactured housing shall be architecturally treated with an exterior non-reflective
surface material customarily used on conventional housing and shall extend from the eave
line to the foundation, and shall be architecturally designed to be compatible with the
surrounding area.
B. Commercial modular units shall be architecturally treated with an exterior non-
reflective surface material customarily used on commercial structures and shall extend from
the eave line to the foundation, and shall be architecturally designed to be compatible with
surrounding commercial and/or industrial structures.
All manufactured housing shall be covered with an exterior nonreflective surface material
customarily used on a conventional house and shall extend from the eave line to the
foundation. Said covering material shall be approved by the site and architectural review
board.
18.66.08090 Roof design
All roof designs for manufactured homeshousing shall include:
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 20 of 35
A. A minimum sixteentwelve inch overhang;
B. A minimum pitch of not less than two inches vertical rise for each twelve inches of
horizontal run;
C. Roofing materials of a type customarily used for conventional single family dwellings.
18.66.090100 Off-street parking
The provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Off Street Parking) shall apply.for a single-family dwelling
unit in the case of R1-7.2 district and office use in the M2 and MR districts shall apply in
determining the amount of parking space that must be provided.
18.66.100110 Mechanical equipment
Mechanical equipment for a manufactured house shall not be located so as to not be visible
from a public street or adjoining property.
18.66.11020 Site and architectural review
A. Manufactured homes shall be subject to the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.63
(Site and Architectural Review).
B. In addition to Chapter 18.63 (Site and Architectural Review), commercial modular
units shall be subject to Chapter 18.83 (Conditional Use Permit).
All manufactured housing shall be subject to site and architectural review in accordance
with Chapter 18.63, and in the MR and M2 districts will be strictly reviewed for compatibility,
appropriateness with other permanent uses on the site and surrounding areas and shall be
subordinate to the other uses.
18.66.12030 Other regulations
The placement and occupancy of manufactured homes or modular unitshousing shall be
subject to the provisions of this title and all other applicable state and local codes.
CHAPTER 18.68 (REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS) IS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED
TO TITLE 18:
CHAPTER 18.68
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
Sections:
18.68.010 Purpose
18.68.020 Definitions
18.68.030 Applicability
18.68.040 Notice to the public of availability of accommodation process
18.68.050 Application
18.68.060 Submittal process
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 21 of 35
18.68.070 Review and Notice
18.68.080 Approval Requirements
18.68.090 Findings
18.68.100 Appeals
18.68.110 Expiration and Extensions
Section 18.68.010 Purpose
It is the purpose of this chapter, in compliance with the fair housing laws, to provide a
procedure to evaluate requests for reasonable accommodation related to specific
applications of the zoning code to provide individuals with disabilities reasonable
accommodation in rules, policies, practices and procedures to ensure equal access to
housing and facilitate the development of housing for individuals with disabilities. The
ordinance codified in this article establishes a procedure for making requests for reasonable
accommodation in land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices and procedures of
the city to comply fully with the intent and purpose of fair housing laws.
Section 18.68.020 Definitions
A. The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall have the
following meanings:
1. Applicant: The person, business, or organization which has applied to the city
for a reasonable accommodation pursuant to this chapter.
2. Dwelling Occupant: The person who will occupy the subject property and who
is protected under the fair housing laws.
3. Fair Housing Laws: Section 42 United States Code section 3604(f)(3)(B) and
California Government Code sections 12927(C)(1) and 12955.1, as those
provisions now exist and as they may be amended from time to time.
4. Disabled or handicapped person: Any person who has a physical or mental
impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, or any
person having a record of such an impairment, but such term does not
include current, illegal use of, or an addiction to, a controlled substance.
Section 18.68.030 Applicability
A. Reasonable accommodation in the land use and zoning context means providing
individuals with disabilities or developers of housing for people with disabilities,
flexibility in the application of land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices and
procedures, or even waiving certain requirements, when it is necessary to eliminate
barriers to housing opportunities.
B. An individual with a disability is someone who has a physical or mental impairment
that substantially limits one or more of such person’s major life activities, as
furthered defined and amended in the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) of
California Government Code Sections 12926(i)(1), (2), and 12926(k)(1), (2).
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 22 of 35
C. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a
disability, his or her representative, or an entity, developer or provider of housing for
individuals with disabilities, when the application of a land use or zoning regulation,
policy, practice or procedure acts as a barrier to housing opportunities.
D. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to
the rules, standards, and practices for the site, development and use of housing-
related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a
disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice. This chapter is intended to
provide for minor structural modifications and/or regulatory exceptions. Nothing in
this article shall require the city to waive or reduce development fees associated with
the granting of a reasonable accommodation request.
Section 18.68.040 Notice to the public of availability of accommodation process
Notice of the availability of reasonable accommodation shall be prominently displayed at
public information counters in the Community and Economic Development Department,
advising the public of the availability of the procedure for eligible individuals. Forms for
requesting reasonable accommodation shall be available to the public in the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Section 18.68.050 Application
Any person with a disability may submit an application for reasonable accommodation by
submitting a Land Use application to the City's Community and Economic Development
Director, or his or her designee, on a form provided by the city, along with applicable filing
fee.
Section 18.68.060 Submittal process
A. In addition to the materials and information included in the Land Use application, the
following information shall also be provided with the application
1. The specific zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy of the city from
which relief is sought;
2. An explanation of why the specified zoning code, law, regulation, procedure
or policy is preventing, or will prevent, the applicant's use and enjoyment of
the subject property;
3. The nature of the accommodation requested;
4. The basis for the claim that the fair housing laws consider the applicant as
protected (applicant should submit a letter from a medical doctor, handicap
license, or other similar supportive evidence).
B. If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is being made
also requires some other discretionary approval (including, but not limited to, a
conditional use permit, design review, general plan amendment, zoning change,
annexation, etc.), then the applicant shall file the information required by this section
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 23 of 35
together for concurrent review with the application for discretionary approval, and in
which case the applicant shall only pay the required fee for the discretionary
approval.
C. Any information related to a disability status and identified by an applicant as
confidential shall be retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of the
applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection.
D. A request for reasonable accommodation in regulations, policies, practices and
procedures may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary to
ensure equal access to housing. A reasonable accommodation does not affect an
individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue in the
requested accommodation.
E. If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable
accommodation, the city will provide assistance to ensure that the process is
accessible.
Section 18.68.070 Review and Notice
A. The Community and Economic Development Director shall route a copy of the
application, plans, and materials to applicable reviewing agencies, and shall review
the application for acceptance.
B. Notice of the filing of an application for reasonable accommodation shall be mailed
to all adjacent property owners of the property which is the subject of the application
requesting comments within ten days of the mailed notice date.
C. The notice shall set forth the address of the subject property, the specific zoning
code, law, regulation, procedure or policy from which relief is being requested, and
the nature of the accommodation requested. The notice shall also inform
surrounding property owners that they may contact the City's Community and
Economic Development Director, or his or her designee, in order to request written
notice of any decisions made, or hearings scheduled, regarding the application.
Section 18.68.080 Approval Requirements
A. The Community and Economic Development Director shall have the authority to
consider and act on any application for a reasonable accommodation, and may
deny, approve or conditionally approve the request in accordance with the required
findings set forth in Section 18.68.090, and shall issue a written determination within
thirty (30) days of the date of receipt of a completed application.
B. The Community and Economic Development Director may also refer the request for
reasonable accommodation, in his or her sole discretion, to the Planning
Commission. Such referrals, if made, shall occur within fifteen (15) days after the
Community and Economic Development Director's receipt of a complete application.
In which case, the Planning Commission shall render a decision on the application in
the same manner as it considers an appeal. The written determination shall be
made in accordance with the required findings set forth in Section 18.68.090.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 24 of 35
C. If necessary to reach a determination on the request for reasonable accommodation,
the Community and Economic Development Director may request further information
from the applicant consistent with fair housing laws, specifying in detail the
information that is required. In the event that a request for additional information is
made, the thirty (30) day period to issue a decision is stayed until the applicant
responds to the request.
D. A request for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with
another discretionary application shall be reviewed by the authority reviewing the
discretionary land use application. The written determination on whether to grant or
deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made by the applicable
reviewing authority in compliance with the applicable review procedure for the
discretionary review. The written determination to grant or deny the request for
reasonable accommodation shall be made in accordance with Section 18.68.090 of
this article.
E. A reasonable accommodation that is granted pursuant to this chapter shall not
require the approval of any variance as the reasonable accommodation.
F. The reasonable accommodation shall be subject to any reasonable conditions
imposed on the approval that are consistent with the purposes of this chapter to
further fair housing. Such conditions may generally include, but are not limited to the
following restrictions:
1. That the reasonable accommodation shall only be applicable to particular
individual(s);
2. That the reasonable accommodation shall only be applicable to the specific
use for which application is made; and/or
3. That any change in use or circumstances which negates the basis for the
granting of the approval shall render the reasonable accommodation null and
void and/or revocable by the city.
4. That any removable structures or physical design features that are
constructed or installed in association with the reasonable accommodation be
removed once those structures or physical design features are unnecessary
to provide access to the dwelling unit for the current occupants.
Section 18.68.090 Findings
A. Approval shall be based upon the following findings, which shall be made by the by
the approval authority in approving or denying the application:
1. The person who will use the subject property is protected under the fair
housing laws;
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 25 of 35
2. The requested exception to the zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or
policy is necessary to make specific housing available to persons occupying
the subject property;
3. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or
administrative burden on the city; and
4. The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration of the
city's zoning laws, policies and/or procedures.
5. That alternative reasonable accommodations which may provide an
equivalent level of benefit have been considered, and are not feasible.
Section 18.68.100 Appeals
A. Within ten days of the date of the Community and Economic Development Director’s
written decision, an individual may appeal an adverse decision. Appeals from the
adverse decision shall be made in writing and submitted to the Community and
Economic Development Department.
B. All appeals shall contain a statement of the grounds for the appeal. Any information
related to a disability status and identified by an applicant as confidential shall be
retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of the applicant and shall not
be made available for public inspection.
C. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the appeal. The decision of
the Planning Commission shall be final. A written decision of the Planning
Commission or accessibility standards board of appeals shall be mailed to the
appealing party within ten days of the appeal hearing.
D. If an individual needs assistance in filing an appeal on an adverse decision, the city
will provide assistance to ensure that the appeals process is accessible.
Section 18.68.110 Expirations and Extensions
A. The approval of a reasonable accommodation request shall expire one (1) year from
the date of its approval, unless one of the following occurs:
1. The occupancy, use or construction authorized by the decision has been
inaugurated. For the purposes of this section, the term "inaugurated" shall
mean that applicable grading and building permits have been issued, and that
substantial work has been performed and substantial liabilities have been
incurred in good faith reliance on such permits.
2. The applicant has complied with all applicable conditions of approval.
D. In case the applicant is not able to comply with subparagraphs 1 or 2, above, then
the applicant may apply to the Community and Economic Development Department
for an extension, a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 26 of 35
Director may, upon application by the applicant, extend the period of approval for a
length of time of up to one (1) additional year.
CHAPTER 18.69 (SECOND FAMILY UNITS) OF TITLE 18 IS PROPOSED TO BE
REVISED AS FOLLOWS:
CHAPTER 18.69
SECOND FAMILY UNITS
Sections:
18.69.010 Purpose
18.69.020 Definition
18.69.030 Permitted location
18.69.040 Site development standards
18.69.050 Special regulations
18.69.060 Off-street parking
18.69.070 Approval criteria
18.69.080 Administrative and non-administrative conditional use permits
Section 18.69.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the placement of second family
units and to ensure the placement of such a unit is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and single family units.
Section 18.69.020 Definition
"Second family unit" means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which
provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include
permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel
as the single family dwelling is situated.
Section 18.69.030 Permitted location
Second-family units are permitted in any single family or multi-family residential zone district
subject to the approval of the Administrative Site and Architectural Review Board and/or
Director as set forth in Chapter 18.63 of this Zoning Code.an administrative conditional use
permit as set forth in Chapter 18.84 of the Zoning Code if the proposed second-family unit is
attached to the main residence and to the approval of a conditional use permit requiring a
public hearing as set forth in Chapter 18.83 of the Zoning Code if the proposed second-
family unit is detached from the main residence.
Section 18.69.040 Site development standards
Site development standards for second-family units shall be the same as those required in
Chapter 18.10 for the appropriate residentialR1 district except where the special regulations
listed in Section 18.69.050 are in conflict with those in Chapter 18.10. In such cases the
standards listed in Section 18.69.050 shall apply.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 27 of 35
Section 18.69.050 Special regulations
All second-family units shall be subject to the following regulations:
A. The lot size shall be a minimum of one and one-half times the minimum lot size of
the underlying zone district. If a parcel with a second dwelling unit is subsequently
subdivided, the cCity may require the second dwelling unit be moved if proper setbacks and
other development standards cannot be met.
BA. The floor area of the second-family unit, excluding the garage, shall not exceed thirty
percent of the living area of the existing main dwelling where the unit is attached excepting
that on lots twenty-five percent greater than minimum required area or larger, on a case by
case review, the Community and Economic Development Director may permit a greater
percentage of the living area as long as it is determined that there will be no adverse effects
on adjacent parcels or the community. If the Director cannot make such a determination, the
matter may be referred to the Planning Commission per Section 18.69.080. In addition, the
floor area of the second-family unit shall not exceed ten percent of the subject site where
the unit is detached. In no instance shall any second-family unit exceed one thousand two
hundred square feet in size nor be smaller than an area to provide for an "efficiency unit" as
defined by the UniformCalifornia Building Code.
CB. Any single-family detached dwelling regardless of size of the living area may have at
least an attached "efficiency unit" as defined by the UniformCalifornia Building Code
provided all other requirements of this ordinance codified in this chapter are met.
D. A detached second dwelling shall be limited in height to a single story 20-foot high
building.
E. A detached second dwelling unit shall have a minimum wall separation from the
primary dwelling of 15 feet.
FC. One of the two dwellings, either the primary or second dwelling, must be occupied by
the owner of the property.The applicant for a second-family unit must be an owner-occupant
of the main residence.
G. A manufactured home on a permanent foundation may be used as a second-family
unit provided said manufactured home meets the requirements of Chapter 18.66 of this title.
H. The second-family unit shall conform to the color, materials, architectural style, and
detailing of the main residence and shall meet all other applicable building code
requirements and development standards of the zone for single-family residential structures
and accessory structures.
I.D. A second-family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon which there is located
more than one dwelling unit.A second-family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon
which a duplex, triplex, apartment house or condominium is located.
JE. A second-family unit project shall provide for landscape compensation for any
removed trees or shrubs.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 28 of 35
F. A second-family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon which there is located
more than one dwelling unit.
KG. The second-family unit may be rented but shall not be sold, transferred or assigned
separately from the main single-family dwelling.
LH. A maximum of one second-family unit shall be permitted on a lot.
I. The site in question must meet the minimum lot area requirements for the zoning
district in which it is located.
M. If one of the two dwellings is no longer owner occupied for any period longer than 60
days, one of the two dwellings is required to be converted to accessory living quarters or a
guest house, and kitchen facilities shall be removed.
N.J. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the second dwelling, a covenant on the
property shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorder’s Office, subject to
City approval, to restrict the property with the requirements of this section. This use
restriction shall be binding upon any successor in ownership of the property.Land use
(deed) restrictions must be recorded enforcing the conditions of the conditional use permit
before the issuance of building permits to construct the second-family unit.
K. Conventional metal—sided mobilehomes may not be used as a second-family unit.
A manufactured home on a permanent foundation may be used as a second-family unit
provided said manufactured home meets the design requirements of Chapter 18.66 of the
Zoning Code and the requirement for a conditional use permit with public hearing be- fore
the planning commission under Chapter 18.83 of the Zoning Code.
Section 18.69.060 Off-street parking
In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.60 for the main single-family residence, one
parking space shall be provided for the second-family unit or one per each bedroom in the
unit, whichever results in the greatest number of spaces being required. The required
parking space for the second-family unit shall be enclosed and may be uncovered, shall be
located on the same lot as the second-family unit, and shall meet the design standards of
Chapter 18.60 (Off-street Parking).
Section 18.69.070 Approval criteria
In addition to the findings required in Chapter 18.63 for administrative site and architectural
review18.83 for conditional use permits with a public hearing or in Chapter 18.84 for an
administrative conditional use permit without a public hearing, the Community and
Economic Development Director or planning commission shall approve a second-family unit
only if the following findings can be made:
A. The addition is nicely integrated into the "house envelope" and/or the site improving
the appearance of the main residence and being an asset to the property.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 29 of 35
B. The second-family unit is clearly subordinate in size, location, appearance and
access to the main residence unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission
following a public hearing.
C. The second-family unit will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare of the persons residing within the neighborhood of the proposed
unit or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city.
C. The second-family unit shall conform to the color, materials, architectural style, and
detailing of the main residence and shall meet all other applicable building code
requirements and development standards of the zone for single-family residential structures
and accessory structures.
D. The second-family unit will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare of the persons residing within the neighborhood of the proposed
unit or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city.
Section 18.69.080 Administrative and non-administrative conditional use permits
All second-family units shall be subject to a conditional use permit in accordance with
Chapter 18.83 requiring a public hearing before the planning commission for a detached
type unit and with Chapter 18.84 allowing for an administrative review and approval by the
director without a public hearing for an attached type unit. These provisions shall apply in all
cases unless the approval criteria specified in this chapter are not met for an attached type
unit in which case the matter shall be referred to the planning commission for a public
hearing as specified in Chapter 18.83 of the Zoning Code.
CHAPTER 18.78 (EMERGENCY SHELTERS) IS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO TITLE
18:
CHAPTER 18.78
EMERGENCY SHELTERS
Sections:
18.78.010 Purpose
18.78.020 Review Procedures
18.78.030 Location Restrictions
18.78.040 Development Standards
18.78.050 Operational Standards
18.78.060 Compliance with Other Applicable Codes
18.78.070 Denial of an Emergency Shelter
Section 18.78.010 Purpose
In accordance with the authority granted in Section 65583 of the California Government
Code, this chapter provides the standards for the establishment and operation of
emergency shelters.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 30 of 35
Section 18.78.020 Review Procedures
Emergency shelters, as defined in Section 18.06.278, shall be permitted in the M2-Industrial
zone district, subject to Site and Architectural Review, which shall be limited to design
review only. The City shall not require a Conditional Use Permit or other discretionary
permit for the construction of an emergency shelter.
Section 18.78.030 Location Restrictions
A. An emergency shelter shall be located at least 300 feet from any other emergency
shelter.
B. The distance of separation shall be measured in a straight line between the property
lines of each use without regard to intervening structures, objects, or city limit lines.
Section 18.78.040 Development Standards
A. Each emergency shelter may have a maximum of 25 beds, with at least 35 square
feet of sleeping area per bed.
B. Each emergency shelter shall provide a client waiting and intake area of at least 10
square feet per bed but at least 200 square feet in total floor area. The intake waiting
area shall be in a location not visible from the adjacent right of way. If located at the
exterior of a building, the area shall be visually separated from public view by a six
foot high decorative masonry wall and shall be covered for shade and rain
considerations.
C. Living, dining, and kitchen areas shall be physically separated from sleeping areas.
D. Each emergency shelter shall provide facilities for personal care (i.e., bathroom and
shower facilities).
E. The shelter shall provide landline telephone services separate from the office phone
in order to provide privacy. Any payphones provided shall allow call-out service only.
F. One parking space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided,
unless it is demonstrated that a different parking ratio is appropriate based upon the
submittal and approval of a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic engineer to
justify the provision of a lesser number of spaces than that required by this section,
based on shared use of spaces, the nature of the use, or other factors.
1. The design of off street parking facilities shall comply with Chapter 18.60 Off-
Street Parking.
2. Non operational and unregistered vehicles shall not be kept on site and
towing shall be the responsibility of the shelter operator.
G. Parking and outdoor facilities shall be designed to provide security for residents,
visitors and employees.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 31 of 35
H. The facility and/or the premises shall be accessed by one entrance.
I. Adequate external lighting shall be provided for security purposes. The lighting shall
be stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjacent properties and public
rights-of-way, and of an intensity that is compatible with the neighborhood.
J. Trash enclosures and refuse areas shall be provided.
Section 18.78.050 Operational Standards
A. The maximum length of stay shall be 180 days within 365 consecutive days.
B. The provider shall prepare and file a management plan with the City that includes
clear operational rules and standards, including, but not limited to, standards
governing expulsions and lights out, security, screening of residents to ensure
compatibility with services provided at the shelter.
1. Staff and services shall be provided to assist residents to obtain permanent
shelter and income. Supplemental services (e.g., food, counseling, access to
other social programs, etc.) may be offered on the inside of the premises.
C. At least one facility supervisor/manager shall be on-site at all hours that the facility is
open. Additional support staff shall be provided, as necessary, to ensure that at least
one staff member is provided in all segregated sleeping areas, as appropriate.
D. The operator shall provide information about how to contact the operator with
questions or concerns regarding shelter operations. The contact information shall be
posted on site where it is readily viewable by an employee, shelter inhabitant, or
representative of a governmental agency.
E. Security personnel shall be provided during the hours that the shelter is in operation.
F. The shelter operator shall frequently patrol the surrounding area within 500 feet for
one hour after the closing of the shelter each morning to ensure that homeless
shelter residents are not congregating in the neighborhood. For those shelters that
provide 24-hour service, the patrol shall occur for one hour after capacity has been
reached.
G. The shelter operator shall regularly patrol the area surrounding the shelter site
during hours that the shelter is in operation to ensure that homeless persons who
have been denied access are not congregating in the neighborhood.
H. The owner/operator shall maintain the exterior of the premises, including:
1. Maintaining signs and accessory structures, free of litter and graffiti at all
times;
2. Daily removal of trash from the premises and abutting sidewalks or alleys
within 20 feet of the premises; and
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 32 of 35
3. Removal of graffiti within 24 hours of notice from the City.
Section 18.78.060 Compliance with Other Applicable Codes
Each emergency shelter operator shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local
codes, including but not limited to, the Building Code, Fire Code, and State Department of
Social Services licensing requirements.
18.78.070 Denial of an Emergency Shelter
A. The City may not disapprove an emergency shelter, or condition the approval of an
emergency shelter in a manner that makes its development infeasible, unless it
makes written findings, based upon substantial evidence in the record, as to one of
the following:
1. The City has met or exceeded the need for emergency shelters as identified
in the housing element.
2. The emergency shelter would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public
health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or
avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development of the
emergency shelter financially infeasible. As used in this subsection, a
“specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and
unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or
safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the
application was deemed complete.
3. The denial of the project or imposition of conditions is required in order to
comply with specific State or Federal law, and there is no feasible method to
comply without rendering the development of the emergency shelter
financially infeasible.
CHAPTER 18.82 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIED LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES) IS
PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO TITLE 18:
Chapter 18.82
STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIED LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES
Sections:
18.82.010 Residential Care Facilities
18.82.020 Transitional and Supportive Housing and Single Room Occupancy Facilities
Section 18.82.010 Residential Care Facilities
A. Purpose. This Section provides standards for the establishment and operation of
residential care facilities.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 33 of 35
B. Applicability. The standards in this Chapter apply to residential, group or community
care facilities where allowed in compliance with Chapter 18.10 (Residential Zones).
C. Development and Operational Standards
1. Residential care facilities serving 6 or fewer persons. Each residential care
facility shall conform to the property development standards for the land use zoning district
in which it is located.
2. Residential care facilities serving 7 or more persons.
a. Applicable land use zoning district development standards. Each
residential care facility shall conform to the property development standards for the land use
zoning district in which it is located.
b. Additional Application Filing Requirements. The following information
shall accompany the Conditional Use Permit application for a residential care facility:
i. Client profile (the subgroup of the population of the facility is
intended to serve such as single men, families, elderly, minor children, developmentally
disabled, etc.);
ii. Maximum number of occupants and hours of facility operation;
iii. Term of client stay;
iv. Support services to be provided on-site and projected staffing
levels; and
v. Rules of conduct and/or management plan.
c. Separation. Residential care facilities shall not be located within 300
feet of another similar facility, except that the separation requirement shall be increased to
1,000 feet, as measured from the nearest outside building walls where the other use is a
parolee/probationer or sober living home.
d. Walls. Residential care facilities shall provide a 6-foot high solid
decorative block wall along all property lines, except in the front yard. Walls shall provide
for safety with controlled points of entry and shall incorporate decorative materials and
features.
e. Landscaping. On-site landscaping shall be regularly maintained,
including providing irrigation.
f. Outdoor lighting. Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 18.60
(Off-Street Parking).
g. Parking. All garage and driveway spaces associated the Facility shall,
at all times, be available for the parking of vehicles. The precise number of parking spaces
required will be determined by the operating characteristics of the specific proposal.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 34 of 35
h. Signs. No commercial identification signs shall be allowed within a
residential land use zoning district.
i. Sleeping areas. No room commonly used for other purposes shall be
used as a sleeping room for any resident, visitor, or staff person. This includes any hall,
stairway, unfinished attic, garage, storage area, shed or similar detached building.
j. Fire Department requirements. Each residential care facility shall
provide fire extinguishers and smoke detector devices and shall meet all standards
established by the Fire Chief.
k. Noise. Outdoor activities shall be conducted only between the hours of
7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
l. Applicable health and safety regulations. Residential care facilities
shall be operated in compliance with applicable State and local health and safety
regulations.
m. Required permits and licenses. Residential care facilities shall be in
conformance with the California Building Code. A certificate of occupancy shall be obtained
from the Building and Safety Division before occupancy of residential care facilities.
Section 18.82.020 – Transitional and Supportive Housing, and Single Room
Occupancy Facilities
A. In addition to the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit and Section 18.82.010
(Residential Care Facilities) transitional shelter housing and single room occupancy uses
shall comply with the following:
1. Occupancy. No more than one (1) federal, state or youth authority parolees
shall be allowed to live in the transitional and supportive housing or single room occupancy
facility.
2. Number of Occupants. The California Building Code shall determine the
number of occupants in transitional and supportive housing or single room occupancy
facility.
2. Application. The Conditional Use Permit application submitted for the use
shall identify whether any tenants are currently federal, state or youth authority parolees.
Owners and or operators of approved transitional and housing facilities, and single room
occupancy facilities shall update the information required by this section anytime a person
that is a federal, state or youth authority parolee is provided accommodations at a
transitional and housing or single room occupancy facility.
3. Crime prevention program. The operator of transitional and supportive
housing, and single room occupancy facilities shall require tenants to sign a crime free
lease addendum as part of their lease or rental agreement. A sample crime free lease
addendum shall be provided by the City. The crime free lease addendum shall provide that
any criminal violations perpetrated by tenants shall be grounds for termination of the written
or oral lease sublease or agreement under which they reside at the transitional facility.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 35 of 35
4. Crime free multi-housing program. The facility's management shall participate
in any formal residential crime prevention program (i.e., Crime Free Multi-Housing Program)
provided by the City or the County of San Bernardino and as required under the conditional
use permit. If the program offers certification then that certification shall be obtained and
maintained in current status.
5. Compliance. Transitional and housing facilities, and single room occupancy
facilities shall be in compliance with all requirements of the Grand Terrace Zoning Code and
their approved Conditional Use Permit at all times. Violation of any local, state or federal
laws by individual tenants while on the premises shall be grounds for revocation of the
permit, including but not limited to, violations of California Penal Code § 3003.5.
6. Nuisance. No transitional and housing, or single room occupancy facility shall
be maintained as a nuisance.
7. Revocation. Violations of any of the provisions in this section or the approved
Conditional Use Permit authorizing the transitional and housing or single room occupancy
facility shall be grounds for revocation. The procedures for revocation contained in Chapter
18.83 of this Title shall be followed.
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
P
C
R
e
s
o
1
2
-
0
3
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600
Community and Economic Development Department
GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 5, 2012
The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Planning Commission was called to order
at the Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on
April 5, 2012 at 6:30 p.m., by Chairman Doug Wilson.
PRESENT: Doug Wilson, Chairman
Matthew Addington, Vice Chairman
Tom Comstock, Commissioner
Bob Bailes, Commissioner
Ohm Kongtang, Commissioner
Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director
Sandra Molina, Senior Planner
Ivy Tsai, Assistant City Attorney
Mari Montes, Secretary
6:30 P.M.: CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Chairman Wilson convened the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission
meeting.
• Call to Order – Chairman Wilson
• Pledge of Allegiance – Commissioner Comstock
• Roll Call – All Present
• Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless
extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation,
please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community
and Economic Development.
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items
not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in
California Law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item
not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a
question for clarification. The Chairman may also request a brief response
from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter
be agendized for a future meeting.
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
2
GENERAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Jeffery McConnell, Walnut Avenue – Invited attendees to the Lion’s Club semi-annual
pancake breakfast on April 29th at the Grand Terrace Lion’s Community Center.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
1.1 MINUTES: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 1, 2012
MOTION PC-07-2012 Commissioner Comstock made a motion to continue the
meeting minutes to the next meeting with edits to be made
as indicated.
Second by Vice Chairman Addington
Sandra Molina, Senior Planner – Asked for clarification, the minutes will be brought back
to the Planning Commission at the next meeting showing the changes that Commissioner
Comstock has requested.
Motion carries 5 – 0
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1
PROPOSAL: General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zone Change 12-01, and
Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
LOCATION: 11695 Canal Street (APN 0275-251-04), the northwest corner
of Van Buren Street and the Gage Canal (APN 1167-341-02
and -78), and City-wide.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing and adopt the attached Resolution
recommending that the City Council adopt a Negative
Declaration and adopt General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zone
Change 12-01, and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01.
Senior Planner Molina – Presented the staff report. In addition provided notice of a
comment letter from South Coast Air Quality Management District and written
correspondence from neighboring residents who are opposed to project site B. Noted there
is no proposed project at this time. Also informed the Planning Commission the action this
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
3
evening would be to make recommendation to the City Council, and they are the final
approval authority. Proceeded with report.
Chairman Wilson – Excused himself from the meeting at 6:58 p.m. as he was not feeling
well. Requested Vice Chairman Addington to take over and proceed with meeting.
Public Comment
Ray Crowe, 12594 Mirado Avenue – Commented he is opposing the whole issue with the
apartments for a number of reasons. One is the excess traffic, crime and additional cars
parking.
John MacAfee, 12580 Mirado Avenue – Stated he has the same concerns as his
neighbor, Mr. Crowe. People going up and down the Gage Canal, graffiti on walls, crime
rate going up, accessing neighboring back yards, parking, and loud parties.
Bill Hussey, 22780 Lark Street – Indicated his father-in-law lives next to the proposed
project. His main concern is there are enough townhouse/apartment in town. He believes
some are short sale and are having a hard time being sold. Asked why this needs to be
rezoned for apartments, it is set for residential area for housing only.
Dana Boeg, 22381 Van Buren Street – Commented she will be mostly affected as she
lives directly across the street from project site B. She is opposing the change of the zoning,
placing anything other than single family homes is going to be horrible for the neighborhood.
There is already a speeding issue, major traffic issue and bus stop.
Nancy Hassard, 12695 Mirado Avenue – Stated she and her husband purchased their
home 26 years ago. The area is built out and they did not realize the property site was
designated for multi use units. The Gage Canal poses many problems, there is a concrete
drain ditch. There are many teen children who cut through these properties and climb
fences, go through trash and graffiti the area. As homeowners they have a 5 gallon bucket
of paint as there is a large amount of graffiti. If the density is changed there could be the
chance of apartments and low cost living. This could bring in a different type of resident,
section 8 and could only imagine the troubles that may occur. Ms. Hassard asked the
Commission to find another property that would be more suitable for use.
Daryl Moore, 22750 Minona Drive – Clarified he owns parcel B. He stated the diversity of
housing stock is always desirable. Indicated City staff did a good job in choosing the parcels
to comply with the State as in both cases they have high density areas and are reasonably
screened. Any project that is placed would be fenced and does not see how this would
cause problems with the canal as it already has it’s own problem.
Jeffery McConnell, Walnut Avenue – Indicated he is a local real estate broker and has
been working with Mr. Moore on this and other projects in the area. The last time this type of
project was proposed was where the Hidden Gate Community is now and apartments were
proposed that were turned down. Does not believe parcel B would ever be an apartment
project. The project that has been worked on is a quality product with diversity. As for the
Gage Canal, until it is fenced off it will always have the problems that exist.
Shannon Wilson, 12580 Mirado Avenue – Is attending as a parent, the children use the
bus stop on Van Buren. If the apartments are allowed this would allow for bad people to be
around children. With the canal behind the homes there are various improper activities that
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
4
take place. Neighbors report the activity to the Sheriff department but do not respond. There
would be crime, gangs and she opposes is to the proposed at parcel B.
Jeffery McConnell – Commented there is the site, Amber’s Law, about registered sex
offenders. With the new park being developed on Grand Terrace Road there is no place
within the City that a registered sex offender can legal move into.
Dana Boeg – Regarding the canal traffic, she does not think anyone mentioned not
changing the zoning will stop what is happening within the canal. The issue is when more
people move into this area this would allow more of these kids access the canal as a short
cut.
Vice Chairman Addington – Closed the public comments.
Commissioner Comstock – Requested that parcel A and parcel B be treated separate
under the Commissioners consideration.
Senior Planner Molina – Responded yes, this can be done.
Vice Chairman Addington – Indicated his question is going back to the Housing Element.
The State is directing how many housing unit of a certain type there need to be in the City
for various income levels?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded not the housing types but are mandating the density.
Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director – Indicated the State
gives the numbers and the City must accommodate through zoning.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if any City chooses not follow the mandate from the
State, what are the consequences?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded as far as having enough zoning in place and to
accommodate the regional housing need, when the next housing cycle begins and the City
has not accommodated the acreage then the City would have to accommodate during the
new cycle.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if the City does rezone now then would be
grandfathered in or what would happen in the next cycle?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded in the next cycle the City would have to demonstrate
that there is land to accommodate the new housing allocation which is expected to be 120-
130 units.
Vice Chairman Addington – Indicated it would be tough as the City could not incorporate
anywhere else. There is only fixed amount of land.
Senior Planner Molina – The City is required to demonstrate that there is land available.
Once the new housing cycle starts the land inventory would be done again and vacant land
would be available to accommodate the new housing need.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if site B is pulled now what would be the alternatives
that could be projected in the future.
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
5
Senior Planner Molina – Asked if the alternatives the Vice Chair refers to are what can be
done with project site B or alternative to the new housing element that will be coming out?
Vice Chairman Addington – Indicated the new housing element. As much as he disagrees
with what the State is mandating he understands they have the power and authority to tell
the cities what to do. If the required housing density is not met now what other sites could be
looked at? Are these in areas that would have less opposition?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded the City is primarily built out and would be looking at
small infill sites similar to what was reviewed in Planned Residential Development
ordinance. Staff is focused on the R-3 zone districts as they are already zoned for the higher
density.
Commissioner Comstock – If the Planning Commission goes through this cycle and does
not meet the State numbers and goes through the next cycle and again does not meet the
numbers due to land lock, what would be the penalties the State could be bring upon the
City?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded could not tell what the penalties could be.
Ivy Tsai, Assistant City Attorney – Indicated she has briefly reviewed the State Code, and
the consequences would be the ability to zone being held or holds up future (inaudible)
code, but would have to review once again to be more specific.
Commissioner Comstock – Indicated he is general contractor and knows of cities that are
35-45% short of the numbers the State has mandated. The State came in and took the all
the Redevelopment Agency money and were not able to complete some of the projects that
were lined up. Looks at these types of situations and thinks what can the State do as the
City is only 28 units shorts.
Commissioner Kongtang – Stated the same comments as Commissioner Comstock and
what would be the consequence and penalties for not meeting the State manadate.
Commissioner Comstock – State there are three issues presented to Planning
Commission, site A, site B and the upgrades to the Zoning Code and the Housing Element.
There has been no discussion to the housing element, does the Commission want to handle
all in one or vote on each one individually?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded the Commission could separate and take separate
votes.
MOTION PC-08-2012 Commissioner Comstock made a motion to approve the high
density zoning change for Site A.
Second by Commissioner Kongtang
Motion carries 4 – 0, with Chairman Wilson absent.
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
6
MOTION PC-09-2012 Commissioner Comstock made a motion on Site B to table
the measure until the Commission can see what kind of
development would be brought to the property.
Second by Commissioner Bailes
Vice Chairman Addington – Indicated by tabling this, what does this mean? Continuing it
to when?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded it would be an indefinite date. The measure would be
tabled and would not come back, from what she understands the motion is, until there is an
application that moves forward on the site.
Commissioner Comstock – Confirmed this is of the intent.
Motion carries 4 – 0, with Chairman Wilson absent.
Commissioner Comstock – Requested to have discussions regarding the changes to the
Zoning Code?
Vice Chairman Addington – Confirmed yes.
Commissioner Comstock – Referred to report page 28 of 35, line item M, he comments
that the time frame indicated is too short. Would like to see this extended out to 60 days and
possibly 90 days.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked Commissioner Comstock what his thoughts are behind
this.
Commissioner Comstock – Responded he does not believe 30 days is enough time to get
another person in a unit. Due to certain situations, families trying to get their affairs in order,
and in a down market they would have to trouble getting someone else to occupy the unit.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if the intent of item M to prevent someone from renting
out both the main house and secondary house?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded yes this would be the intent, however 60 days would
not be unreasonable.
Commissioner Comstock – Indicated he would like to see this correction.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if the consensus of the Commission is for 60 days or
different time period?
Commissioners – Consensus of 60 day period.
Commissioner Comstock – Referred to same page 28, section 18.69.060, is wondering
how reasonable is this to ask for another structure or an additional structure to be added on
to a second family unit, especially when there is a limitation of 30% of the original dwelling
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
7
unit size. Commissioner believes it is unrealistic, thinks a carport would do fine or even just
to make sure there is some on site parking somewhere.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if this is for new structures coming in or does this affect
existing structures.
Director Powers – Responded it would be for new structures coming in. As there are
people with storage items in addition to their cars that need to be kept out of public view.
Without some garage or storage space there is a tendency that the maintenance becomes
poor.
Commissioner Comstock – Asked if the enclosed space for parking is in under the 30% of
the dwelling unit or is this in addition?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded in addition.
Commissioner Comstock – Asked for a clarification about this, to spell it out in the code?
Director Powers – Indicated there was discussion at the Staff level on this. The
recommendation for the enclosed structure was for the purpose previously mentioned.
Vice Chairman Addington – Commented he agrees with the enclosed structure. He
understand where Commissioner Comstock is going for clarification for the general public.
Commissioner Comstock – Indicated he does not have a problem with putting enclosed
structure, it subtracts substantially.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if there could be some wording added, indicating the
garage does not count for the living space calculations.
Director Powers – Agrees, this is what indicated.
Senior Planner Molina – Suggested the language be added to page 27, paragraph B, this
would be the section that refers to the size of the second family unit.
Commissioner Comstock – Has on other correction on page 31 of 35, letter F, indicated it
states number 500 but believes it should state 500 feet.
Senior Planner Molina – Confirmed correction.
Commissioner Bailes – Referred to the parking on page 16, section 18.60.030.A.2, stated
even though the unit is a one bedroom apartment there may be two people living in the unit.
How would two cars be accommodated for parking? Is a motorcycle considered a vehicle?
Senior Planner Molina – Clarified on the first question, what is being proposed is one
parking space for each studio or efficiency unit. Then two parking spaces for each one, two
or three bedroom unit. Response to second question is motorcycle is considered a vehicle,
under the Vehicle Code.
Commissioner Bailes – Asked about handicap parking accommodations?
Vice Chairman Addington – Responded this would be required.
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Planning Commission Minutes-04/05/2012
8
Senior Planner Molina – Asked the Commission since there have been changes to what
was being proposed under the resolution, would like to go through Exhibit 1 and point out
where Staff needs to make changes as some of the Land Use tables need to change as
well. Proceeded with explanation of changes. Would Commissioners be comfortable with
indicating the Staff will make the appropriate changes to the Exhibit?
Vice Chairman Addington – Indicated for the map, he has no issues with Staff correcting
and not coming back to Commission with this.
Commissioner Bailes – Indicated his confusion was vehicle parking, on the Staff Report,
page 2 of 4. It states different than what it states in the Ordinance.
Director Powers – Responded this was changed and was not caught on the Staff Report.
Senior Planner Molina – Continued with the explanation changes on the resolution.
MOTION PC-10-2012 Commissioner Comstock made a motion of a revised
Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Grand
Terrace recommending that the City Council adopt General
Plan Amendment 12-01, amending the General Plan Land
Use map and Land Use Element and Zone Change 12-01
and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01 revising the zoning
map and zoning code as amended.
Second by Commissioner Bailes
Motion carries 4 – 0, with Chairman Wilson absent.
Vice Chairman Addington – Believes this would complete the Site and Architectural
Meeting and then move forward with the Public Workshop.
Senior Planner Molina – Confirmed.
Director Powers – Indicated this item could be rescheduled if the Commission chooses to
have Chairman Wilson in attendance.
Vice Chairman Addington – Agreed this would be a good idea as Chairman Wilson has
great input on items like this.
Senior Planner Molina – Suggested the Planning Commission take a vote to continue this
to the April 19th meeting.
Commissioner Comstock – Indicated he would not be available for the meeting on April
19.
Vice Chairman Addington – Asked if there would be an issue to move this to the first
meeting in May?
Senior Planner Molina – Responded no, there is another item for the first meeting in May
and would work out fine.
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
1
2
P
C
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 1 of 6
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 12-01
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AND LAND USE
ELEMENT
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law
(Division 1 Title 7 of the California Government Code) on April 27, 2010, the City of
Grand Terrace adopted Resolution 2010-10 adopting a General Plan to provide
comprehensive, long-range planning guidelines for future growth and development
which incorporates the following nine elements: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and
Conservation, Public Health and Safety, Noise, Public Services, Housing and
Sustainable Development. Each element of the General Plan provides Goals,
Programs, and Policies as required by State Law;
WHEREAS,the Housing Element established a number of housing programs
which called out certain amendments to be made to City’s General Plan and Zoning
Code, including Program 8.8.1.s calling for a re-designation of 1.35 acres of land to a
density of 20 dwelling units per acre;
WHEREAS,on January 24, 2012, the City Council adopted a Planned
Residential Development Ordinance, which allowed for up to a twenty percent density
bonus for projects certified in LEED for Homes, or ten percent density bonus for projects
that meet or exceed more than a 20% increase in energy efficiency above Title 24
requirements;
WHEREAS,General Plan Amendment 12-01 proposes to amend the General
Plan Land Use Map and Land Use Element in conformance with the Housing Element
and Planned Residential Development Ordinance;
WHEREAS,an environmental Negative Declaration and Initial Study were
prepared for General Plan Amendment 12-01 pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), which were circulated for public review from March 8, 2012, to
March 28, 2012.The Negative Declaration and Initial Study determined that General
Plan Amendment 12-01 would not have a significant effect on the environment;
WHEREAS,on April 5, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on General Plan Amendment 12-01 at the Grand Terrace Council
Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and voted
4-0, recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 12-01 to
amend the General Plan Land Use designation of 0.81 acres from Medium Density
Residential to Medium/High Density Residential, and amend Tables 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of
the Land Use Element;
WHEREAS,on May 22, 2012, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on General Plan Amendment 12-01 at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 2 of 6
located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the
hearing on said date; and
WHEREAS,all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace:
1.The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing,
and substantial evidence in the record, General Plan Amendment 12-01 will not
have a significant effect on the environment. The Negative Declaration has been
reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the City
Council.
2.The City Council finds as follows with respect to General Plan Amendment
12-01:
a.The General Plan Amendment promotes the Grand Terrace General Plan
and each element thereof, and leaves the General Plan a compatible,
integrated and internally consistent statement of goals and policies. The
amendment implements several Housing Element Programs (Programs
8.8.1.c, d, m, o through r and 8.8.3.l); it fulfills Housing Policies 8.1.1 and
8.1.3 to promote and encourage development of housing, which varies by
type, design, form of ownership and size and to encourage infill housing
development and more intensive use of underutilized land for residential
construction.
b.The amendment promotes Land Use Goal 2.1 to provide for balanced
growth which seeks to provide a wide range of employment and housing
opportunities and maintenance of a healthy, diversified community; and
Sustainable Development Policy 9.3.1.a to review the Zoning Code to
promote green building concepts into all development projects including
possible incentives for the expanded use of green building concepts.
c.Adoption of this General Plan Amendment will not be in conflict with
Section 65358(b) of the Government Code relating to the number of
amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the first
amendment of calendar year 2012.
3.Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Council hereby
adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment 12-01
and adopts General Plan Amendment 12-01 amending the General Plan Land
Use Map to re-designate the property shown Exhibit 1, attached hereto, from
Medium Density Residential (MDR)to Medium/High Density Residential (MHDR),
and amending Tables 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of the Land Use Element to read as shown
on Exhibit 2, attached hereto.
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 3 of 6
4.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California,
at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2012.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
____________________________________________________
Tracey Martinez Walt Stanckiewitz
City Clerk Mayor
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 4 of 6
Exhibit 1
Amend the General Plan Land Use Designation from Medium Density Residential
(MDR)to Medium/High Density Residential (MHDR) on the following site:
Project Site A (APN 0275-251-04)
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 5 of 6
Exhibit 2
Table 2.2
General Plan Acreage By Land Use Category
Land Use Category Acres % of Total
Hillside Low Density Residential 125 5.5%
Low Density Residential 885.2 39.2%
Medium Density Residential 184.9 8.2%
Medium High Density Residential 6.8 0.34%
General Commercial 88.4 3.9%
Office Commercial 32.9 1.5%
Light Industrial 107 4.7%
Floodplain Industrial 40.1 1.71%
Hillside Open Space 189.1 8.0%
Mixed Use 93.5 4.2%
Public 158.9 7.0%
Streets 353.00 15.5%
Total 2,255.1 100.00%
Table 2.3
City of Grand Terrace
General Plan Land Use Designations
Land Use Designation Purpose of Land Use
RESIDENTIAL
Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Density Range –6 to 12
dwelling units per gross acre.
The Medium Density Residential designation include both single
family detached and multiple family attached developments.
Permitted uses within these areas may include small lot single
family developments or attached multi-family developments
including townhomes, condominiums, and apartments. Mobile
home developments are also permitted.
A density bonus may be applied to a project pursuant to the density
bonus provisions of Chapter 4.3 of the California Government
Code, or pursuant to an approved Planned Residential Development
application up to a 20% density bonus may be granted.
Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR)
Maximum Density -20 dwelling
units per gross acre
The Medium High Density Residential designation is reserved for
multiple family developments, with an emphasis on affordable
housing projects. Any project proposed for the MHDR designation
may be accompanied by a Specific Plan that provides detailed
information regarding the design and benefits of the proposed
project.
A density bonus may be applied to a project pursuant to the density
bonus provisions of Chapter 4.3 of the California Government
Code, or pursuant to an approved Planned Residential Development
application up to a 20% density bonus may be granted.
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 6 of 6
Table 2.4
Residential Buildout Calculations
Land Use Designation Probable Avg.
Density Acres Dwelling
Units
Persons /
Household
Estimated
Population
Low Density/Hillside 0.7 du/ac 155.3 109 2.83 308
Low Density 3.6 du/ac 885.2 3,187 2.83 9,019
Medium Density 11 du/ac 184.9 2,034 2.83 5,756
Medium High Density 20 du/ac 6.8 136 1.20/2.83+189+
Mixed Use 12 du/ac 14.6*175 2.83 495
Total 1,246.8 5,641 15,767
*Assumes that 15% of the mixed use area is residential.
+Includes existing senior housing in persons per household and estimated population calculations.
6.A.c
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
G
P
A
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 1 of 28
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE 12-01 TO RE-ZONE 0.81 ACRES
FROM R3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO R3-HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 12-01 REVISING TITLE
18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law
(Division 1 Title 7 of the California Government Code) on April 27, 2010, the City of
Grand Terrace adopted Resolution 2010-10 adopting a General Plan to provide
comprehensive, long-range planning guidelines for future growth and development
which incorporates the following nine elements: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and
Conservation, Public Health and Safety, Noise, Public Services, Housing and
Sustainable Development.Each element of the General Plan provides Goals,
Programs, and Policies as required by State Law;
WHEREAS,the Housing Element established a number of housing programs
which called out certain amendments to be made to City’s General Plan and Zoning
Code,including Program 8.8.1.s called for a re-designation of 1.35 acres of land to a
density of 20 dwelling units per acre;
WHEREAS,on January 24, 2012, the City Council adopted a Planned
Residential Development Ordinance, which allowed for up to a twenty percent density
bonus for projects certified in LEED for Homes, or ten percent density bonus for projects
that meet or exceed more than a 20% increase in energy efficiency above Title 24
requirements;
WHEREAS,pursuant to Sections 65800 and 65850 of the California Government
Code, the City may adopt ordinances to regulate the use of buildings, structures, and
land as between industry, business, residences, and open space, and other purposes;
to regulate the location, height, bulk, number of stories and size of buildings and
structures, the size and use of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces, the
percentage of a lot which may be occupied by a building or structure, and the intensity
of land use; and to establish requirements for off-street parking, in compliance with the
California Government Code;
WHEREAS,Zone Change 12-01 proposes to change the zoning district of 0.81
acres, referred to on the County Assessors rolls as APN 0275-251-04,from R3-Medium
Density Residential to R3-High Density Residential; and Zoning Code Amendment
proposes to amend Title 18 of the Municipal Code;
WHEREAS,an environmental Negative Declaration and Initial Study were
prepared for Zone Change 12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01 pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and were circulated for public review from
March 8, 2012, to March 28, 2012.The Negative Declaration and Initial Study
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 2 of 28
determined that the code amendments would not have a significant effect on the
environment;
WHEREAS,on April 5, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795
Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and voted 4-0 recommending that the
City Council adopt Zone Change 12-01 rezoning 0.81 acres from R3-Medium Density
Residential to R3-20 High Density Residential and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
amending various provisions of the Zoning Code;
WHEREAS,on May 22, 2012, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and conducted second reading on June 12,
2012; and
WHEREAS,all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have
occurred.
NOW THEREFORE,it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Grand Terrace, as follows
SECTION 1.The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the
public hearing, and substantial evidence in the record, Zone Change 12-01 and Zoning
Code Amendment 12-01 will not have a significant effect on the environment.The
Negative Declaration has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent
judgment of the City Council, and is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2.The proposed zoning amendments will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working
within the neighborhood of the proposed amendments or injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the Project will promote
variety in housing types available to different economic segments of the community.
The re-zoning will continue to allow multiple family residential development on Project
Site A,albeit at a higher density. The Project will not interfere with the continued use or
enjoyment of surrounding properties.
SECTION 3. The proposed zoning amendments will be consistent with the
latest adopted General Plan. Zone Change 12-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
implement several Housing Programs contained in the General Plan Housing Element.
The zoning amendments implement several Housing Element Programs (Programs
8.8.1.c, d, m, o through r and 8.8.3.l); it fulfills Housing Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 to
promote and encourage development of housing, which varies by type, design, form of
ownership and size and to encourage infill housing development and more intensive
use of underutilized land for residential construction. Additionally,General Plan
Amendment 12-01 is being concurrently processed with the Zone Change and Code
Amendment so that the General Plan and Zoning Code are consistent with one another.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 3 of 28
SECTION 4. The Zoning Map is revised to re-zone the property referred to as
Assessor’s Parcel Number 0275-251-04 shown on Exhibit 1,attached hereto from R3-
Medium Density Residential to R3-20-High Density Residential.
SECTION 5. Section 18.06.287 is added to Chapter 18.06 of the Municipal
Code, to read as follows:
“Section 18.06.287 –Emergency Shelter. “Emergency Shelter” means a
residential facility, other than a community care facility, operated by a provider that
provides temporary accommodations to homeless persons. The term “temporary
accommodations” means that a person will be allowed to reside at the shelter for a time
period not to exceed six months. For purposes of this definition, a “provider” shall mean
a government agency or private non-profit organization which provides or contracts with
recognized community organizations to provide emergency or temporary shelter, and
which may also provide meals, counseling and other services, as well as common areas
for residents of the facility. Such a facility may have individual rooms, but it is not
developed with individual dwelling units, with the exception of the manager’s unit.”
SECTION 6. Section 18.06.635 of Chapter 18.06 of the Municipal Code is
revised to read as follows:
“Section 18.06.635 –Residential Care Facility. “Residential care facility” means
any facility place or building that is maintained and operated to provide non-medical
residential care as defined by State law, including, but not limited to, the physically
handicapped, mentally impaired, incompetent persons, abused or neglected children
and the elderly. The term “residential care facility” is limited to those facilities, places or
buildings that are both subject to regulation and actually licensed by the State of
California. No facility, place or building that may otherwise be regulated by the State of
California, but which is not actually licensed by the State of California, shall be deemed
a “residential care facility” for purposes of this Title. Whether or not unrelated persons
are living together, a residential, community or group care facility licensed by the State
of California that serves six or fewer persons shall be considered a residential use of
property for the purposes of this Title. (A residential care facility that is not licensed by
the State of California shall be deemed a rooming or boarding house.)”
SECTION 7. Section 18.06.856 is added to Chapter 18.06 of the Municipal
Code, to read as follows:
“Section 18.06.856 –Single Room Occupancy. “Single Room Occupancy
(SRO)” means a residential facility where individuals secure rooms, of a smaller size
than normally found in multiple family dwellings, and which are rented to a one or two-
person household. SRO’s living units are provided for a weekly or monthly period of
time, in exchange for an agreed payment of a fixed amount of money or other
compensation based on the period of occupancy.”
SECTION 8. Section 18.06.908 is added to Chapter 18.06 of the Municipal
Code, to read as follows:
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 4 of 28
“Section 18.06.908 –Supportive Housing. “Supportive Housing” means housing
with no limit on the length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, as defined
by Section 50675.14(b)(3) of the Health and Safety Code, and that is linked to onsite or
offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing,
improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when
possible work in the community.”
SECTION 9. Section 18.06.927 is added to Chapter 18.06 of the Municipal
Code, to read as follows:
“Section 18.06.927 –Transitional Housing “Transitional Housing” and
“Transitional Housing Development” means building configured as rental housing
development, but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of
assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at
some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months.”
SECTION 10.Section 18.09.020 (Districts Established)of Chapter 18.09 of the
Municipal Code is revised to add the following zoning district, as follows:
“R3-20 High Density Residential District”
SECTION 11.The title of Chapter 18.10 of the Municipal Code is revised to read
as follows:
“Residential Districts”
SECTION 12.Subsection 18.10.020(F) of Chapter 18.10 of the Municipal Code
is revised to read as follows:
“F.R3, Medium Density Residential District: This district is intended for
medium density multiple family development. The minimum lot size is 12,000 square
feet with a maximum density of twelve (12) dwelling units per gross acre.”
SECTION 13.Subsection 18.10.020(H) is added to Chapter 18.10 of the
Municipal Code, to read as follows:
“H.R3-20, High Density Residential District: This district is intended for
higher density multiple family development, which may include affordable housing. The
minimum lot size is 12,000 square feet with a maximum density of 20 units per acre.”
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 5 of 28
SECTION 14.Table 18.10.030 of Chapter 18.10 of the Municipal Code is revised to read as follows:
“TABLE 18.10.030
Land Use Regulations
Permitted Uses RH R20 R10 R7.2 R2 R3 R3-S R3-20
A.Residential Uses
Single Family (Detached), Full Sized P P P P Pa Pb --
Single Family (Attached)
(Duplexes, Triplexes, and
Fourplexes
----P P
-P
Multiple Family Units ----P P -P
Manufactured Housing
(As Permitted Per Chapter 18.66)P P P P P P --
Mobile Home Park ----C C --
Senior Citizen Housing Pd P
B.Residential Accessory Structures
Accessory Structure P P P P P P Pd P
Second Family Unite
(As Permitted Per Chapter 18.63)P P P P P P --
Guest House C C C C C C --
Private Garage P P P P P P -P
Private Swimming Pool P P P P P P Pd P
Home occupation
(As Permitted Per Chapter 5.06)P P P P P P Pd P
Keeping of Cats and Dogs
(Maximum of Two (2) Each)P P P P P P Pd P
Other Accessory Uses
(As Approved by the Planning Director)P P P P P P Pd P
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
Page 6 of 28
C.Other Uses
Churches
(Minimum Three-Acre Parcel)C C C C C C --
Schools
(Private and Parochial)C C C C C C --
Public Park and Playground P P P P P P --
Public Facilities
(And Quasi-Public)C C C C C C --
Family Day Care
(Eight (8) or Less Children)P P P P P P --
Family Day Care
(Nine (9) or More Children)C C C C C C --
Residential Care Facility
(Six (6) or Less Persons)P P P P P P --
Residential Care Facility
(Seven (7) or More Persons)f ----C C --
Single Room Occupancy ----C C --
Transitional Housing, Supportive Housing ----C C --
Utility or Service Facility C C C C C C --
Outdoor Recreation Facility C C C C C C --
D.Temporary uses
Temporary Uses
(As approved by Planning Director)P P P P P P Pd P
Temporary Trailers
(As Approved by Planning Director)P P P P P P Pd P”
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
Page 7 of 28
SECTION 15.Subsections e and f of Table 18.10.030 (Footnotes)of Chapter
18.10 of the Municipal Code are added to read as follows:
“e.Subject to Administrative Site and Architectural Review.
f.Subject to Administrative Conditional Use Permit.”
SECTION 16.Table 18.10.040 (Site Development Standards) of Chapter 18.10
of the Municipal Code is revised to read as follows:
“TABLE 18.10.040
Site Development Standards
DEVELOPMENT ISSUE RH R20 R10 R7.2 R2 R3 R3-S R3-20
Area (Minimum square
feet)_ a 20,000 10,000 7,200 10,000 12,000 g 12,000
Width (Minimum linear
feet)
* Interior Lot
* Corner Lot
_ a
_ a
100
100
60
70
60
70
60
70
60
70
g 60
70
Lot Depth (Minimum
linear feet)_ a 150 100 100 100 100 g 100
Street Frontage (Minimum
linear feet)_ a 50 40 40 40 40 g 40
Setbacks (Minimum linear
feet)
§Front Yard
§Rear Yard
§Side Yard
-Interior Lot
With Garage
Without Garage
-Corner Lot
Street side
No Street side
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
_ a
25 b
35 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
35 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
l0 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
10 b
5 b
15 b
5
25 b
20 b
10 b
10 b
15 b
10
g
25 b
20 b
10 b
10 b
15 b
10
Density (Allowable dwelling
units per acre)_ a 1-2 1-4 1-5 1-9 1-12 c Max.
20 13-20c
Living Area (Minimum
square feet)
* Single Family
* Duplex, Triplex, Four-plex
and Multiple Family
-One (1) Bedroom
-Two (2) Bedroom
_ a
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
-
-
1,350d
800 d
1,000d
1,350d
800 d
1,000d
g _ g
Height (Maximum linear
feet)_ a 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e g 35 e
Lot Coverage (Maximum
percent)_ a 40 50 50 60 f 60 g 60
Distance Between Buildings
(Minimum linear feet)_ a 5 5 5 20 20 g 20”
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 8 of 28
SECTION 17.Subsection c of Table 18.10.040 (Footnotes)of Chapter 18.10 of
the Municipal Code is revised to read as follows:
“c. A density bonus shall be permitted in accordance with the California
Government Code and this title.”
SECTION 18.Section 18.40.020 of Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code is
revised to add a new paragraph R, and the remaining are renumbered,as follows:
“R.Emergency shelters
S.Other uses which are determined by the Planning Commission to be
similar in nature to a use listed in this section.
T.Temporary uses which are determined by the Community Development
Director not to have a significant long term impact on the environment. (Uses such as
parking lot sales, Christmas tree sales, seasonal sales, rummage sales, and others with
review through the Land Use Approval or Administrative Site and Architectural approval
process in accordance with Chapter 18.63, Site and Architectural Review.”
SECTION 19.Subsection 18.60.030 (A)(2)of Chapter 18.60 of the Municipal
Code is revised to read as follows:
“2.Multiple-family dwellings:
a.One parking space for each studio or efficiency unit.
b.Two parking spaces for each one, two or three bedroom unit.
c.Three parking spaces for each four bedroom unit or more.
d.At least one space shall be located within a garage attached to the
main building in which the residential unit is located, and the other within 100 feet of the
unit being served.
e.Guest parking shall be provided at a ratio of 0.25 spaces for each
residential unit, and shall be rounded up to the next whole number.
f.Guest parking:
(i) Shall be identified as "Guest Parking";
(ii) Shall not be used for the storage of recreational vehicles, boats,
trailers or other similar items;
(iii) Shall be located on the same parcel of land as the residential
units and shall be within reasonable walking distance of said units;
(iv) May be uncovered spaces; and
(v) May be located on a private street or in a common parking
area.”
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 9 of 28
SECTION 20.Section 18.63.030 (Scope)of Chapter 18.63 of the Municipal
Code is revised to add the following paragraph to the beginning of the section,as
follows:
“The responsibility of the Site and Architectural Review Board and/or Director is
to provide comprehensive site plan and architectural review of projects. The scope of
the review is to consider the site plan in relation to the property and development
standards (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage, building height, parking, etc.), placement of
structures, vehicle and pedestrian access, landscaping, police and fire services, grading
and drainage, traffic, relationship to existing and planned uses of adjoining and
surrounding properties, and relationship to nearby properties and structures and
surrounding natural topography. It is also to consider the proposed architecture of
buildings in terms of style and design, materials and colors, and size and bulk in relation
to the surrounding properties.”
SECTION 21.Chapter 18.66 (Manufactured Housing)of the Municipal Code is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Chapter 18.66
MANUFACTURED HOMES AND COMMERCIAL UNITS
Sections:
18.66.010 Purpose
18.66.020 Definition
18.66.030 Permitted locations.
18.66.040 Site development standards
18.66.050 Certifications
18.66.060 Building permit
18.66.070 Exterior surface
18.66.080 Roof design
18.66.090 Off-street parking
18.66.100 Mechanical equipment
18.66.110 Site and architectural review
18.66.120 Other regulations
18.66.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the placement of
manufactured homes in districts zoned for residential development and commercial
modular units in districts zoned for manufacturing or industrial development and to
designate certain areas where the placement of such units is compatible with
surrounding residential and commercial properties.
18.66.020 Definition
A.“Manufactured home” means a mobile home or manufactured house certified by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and constructed in full
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 10 of 28
compliance with the National Mobile Home construction and Safety Standards Act
intended for occupancy by a single family installed on a permanent foundation in
conformance with applicable Zoning regulations.
B.“Commercial modular unit” means a structure transportable in one or more
sections, designed and equipped for human occupancy for industrial, professional, or
commercial purposes, which is required to be moved under permit.
18.66.030 Permitted locations
A.Manufactured homes are a permitted use, as a single family dwelling in the R1,
R2 and R3 zoning districts, and within a permitted mobilehome park.
B.Commercial modular units are a conditionally permitted use in the MR-Restricted
Manufacturing (MR) district and M2-Industrial (M2) district as a business office, and
prohibited in all other zones.
18.66.040 Site development standards
A.Site development standards for manufactured homes and modular units shall
comply with the standards of the underlying zone district, and other applicable
provisions of the zoning code.
B.The age of the manufactured home or modular unit at the time of installation shall
be ten years or less.
C.A manufactured home or modular unit shall be installed on a permanent
foundation.
18.66.050 Certifications
Prior to the installation of a manufactured home or modular unit, all requisite
certifications shall be submitted to the Director of Building and Safety in conjunction with
the application for a building permit.
18.66.060 Building permit
A building permit issued by the Director of Building and Safety is required for the
placement of a manufactured home or modular unit.
18.66.070 Exterior surface
A.Manufactured housing shall be architecturally treated with an exterior non-
reflective surface material customarily used on conventional housing and shall extend
from the eave line to the foundation, and shall be architecturally designed to be
compatible with the surrounding area.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 11 of 28
B.Commercial modular units shall be architecturally treated with an exterior non-
reflective surface material customarily used on commercial structures and shall extend
from the eave line to the foundation, and shall be architecturally designed to be
compatible with surrounding commercial and/or industrial structures.
18.66.080 Roof design
All roof designs for manufactured homes shall include:
A.A minimum sixteen inch overhang;
B.A minimum pitch of not less than two inches vertical rise for each twelve inches
of horizontal run;
C.Roofing materials of a type customarily used for conventional single family
dwellings.
18.66.090 Off-street parking
The provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Off Street Parking) shall apply.
18.66.1000 Mechanical equipment
Mechanical equipment shall be located so as to not be visible from a public street or
adjoining property.
18.66.110 Site and architectural review
A.Manufactured homes shall be subject to the applicable provisions of Chapter
18.63 (Site and Architectural Review).
B.In addition to Chapter 18.63 (Site and Architectural Review), commercial modular
units shall be subject to Chapter 18.83 (Conditional Use Permit).
18.66.120 Other regulations
The placement and occupancy of manufactured homes or modular units shall be
subject to the provisions of this title and all other applicable state and local codes.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 12 of 28
SECTION 22.Chapter 18.68 (Reasonable Accommodations)is added to Title 18
of the Municipal Code, as follows:
“CHAPTER 18.68
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
Sections:
18.68.010 Purpose
18.68.020 Definitions
18.68.030 Applicability
18.68.040 Notice to the public of availability of accommodation process
18.68.050 Application
18.68.060 Submittal process
18.68.070 Review and Notice
18.68.080 Approval Requirements
18.68.090 Findings
18.68.100 Appeals
18.68.110 Expiration and Extensions
Section 18.68.010 Purpose
It is the purpose of this chapter, in compliance with the fair housing laws, to provide a
procedure to evaluate requests for reasonable accommodation related to specific
applications of the zoning code to provide individuals with disabilities reasonable
accommodation in rules, policies, practices and procedures to ensure equal access to
housing and facilitate the development of housing for individuals with disabilities. The
ordinance codified in this article establishes a procedure for making requests for
reasonable accommodation in land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices and
procedures of the city to comply fully with the intent and purpose of fair housing laws.
Section 18.68.020 Definitions
A.The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall
have the following meanings:
1.Applicant: The person, business, or organization which has applied to the
city for a reasonable accommodation pursuant to this chapter.
2.Dwelling Occupant: The person who will occupy the subject property and
who is protected under the fair housing laws.
3.Fair Housing Laws: Section 42 United States Code section 3604(f)(3)(B)
and California Government Code sections 12927(C)(1) and 12955.1, as
those provisions now exist and as they may be amended from time to
time.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 13 of 28
4.Disabled or handicapped person: Any person who has a physical or
mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,
or any person having a record of such an impairment, but such term does
not include current, illegal use of, or an addiction to, a controlled
substance.
Section 18.68.030 Applicability
A.Reasonable accommodation in the land use and zoning context means providing
individuals with disabilities or developers of housing for people with disabilities,
flexibility in the application of land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices
and procedures, or even waiving certain requirements, when it is necessary to
eliminate barriers to housing opportunities.
B.An individual with a disability is someone who has a physical or mental
impairment that substantially limits one or more of such person’s major life
activities, as furthered defined and amended in the Fair Employment and
Housing Act (FEHA) of California Government Code Sections 12926(i)(1), (2),
and 12926(k)(1), (2).
C.A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a
disability, his or her representative, or an entity, developer or provider of housing
for individuals with disabilities, when the application of a land use or zoning
regulation, policy, practice or procedure acts as a barrier to housing
opportunities.
D.A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or
exception to the rules, standards, and practices for the site, development and
use of housing-related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and
provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice.
This chapter is intended to provide for minor structural modifications and/or
regulatory exceptions. Nothing in this article shall require the city to waive or
reduce development fees associated with the granting of a reasonable
accommodation request.
Section 18.68.040 Notice to the public of availability of accommodation process
Notice of the availability of reasonable accommodation shall be prominently displayed at
public information counters in the Community and Economic Development Department,
advising the public of the availability of the procedure for eligible individuals. Forms for
requesting reasonable accommodation shall be available to the public in the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Section 18.68.050 Application
Any person with a disability may submit an application for reasonable accommodation
by submitting a Land Use application to the City's Community and Economic
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 14 of 28
Development Director, or his or her designee, on a form provided by the city, along with
applicable filing fee.
Section 18.68.060 Submittal process
A.In addition to the materials and information included in the Land Use application,
the following information shall also be provided with the application
1.The specific zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy of the city
from which relief is sought;
2.An explanation of why the specified zoning code, law, regulation,
procedure or policy is preventing, or will prevent, the applicant's use and
enjoyment of the subject property;
3.The nature of the accommodation requested;
4.The basis for the claim that the fair housing laws consider the applicant as
protected (applicant should submit a letter from a medical doctor,
handicap license, or other similar supportive evidence).
B.If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is being made
also requires some other discretionary approval (including, but not limited to, a
conditional use permit, design review, general plan amendment, zoning change,
annexation, etc.), then the applicant shall file the information required by this
section together for concurrent review with the application for discretionary
approval, and in which case the applicant shall only pay the required fee for the
discretionary approval.
C.Any information related to a disability status and identified by an applicant as
confidential shall be retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of
the applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection.
D.A request for reasonable accommodation in regulations, policies, practices and
procedures may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary
to ensure equal access to housing. A reasonable accommodation does not affect
an individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue
in the requested accommodation.
E.If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable
accommodation, the city will provide assistance to ensure that the process is
accessible.
Section 18.68.070 Review and Notice
A.The Community and Economic Development Director shall route a copy of the
application, plans, and materials to applicable reviewing agencies, and shall
review the application for acceptance.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 15 of 28
B.Notice of the filing of an application for reasonable accommodation shall be
mailed to all adjacent property owners of the property which is the subject of the
application requesting comments within ten days of the mailed notice date.
C.The notice shall set forth the address of the subject property, the specific zoning
code, law, regulation, procedure or policy from which relief is being requested,
and the nature of the accommodation requested. The notice shall also inform
surrounding property owners that they may contact the City's Community and
Economic Development Director, or his or her designee, in order to request
written notice of any decisions made, or hearings scheduled, regarding the
application.
Section 18.68.080 Approval Requirements
A.The Community and Economic Development Director shall have the authority to
consider and act on any application for a reasonable accommodation, and may
deny, approve or conditionally approve the request in accordance with the
required findings set forth in Section 18.68.090, and shall issue a written
determination within thirty (30) days of the date of receipt of a completed
application.
B.The Community and Economic Development Director may also refer the request
for reasonable accommodation, in his or her sole discretion, to the Planning
Commission. Such referrals, if made, shall occur within fifteen (15) days after the
Community and Economic Development Director's receipt of a complete
application. In which case, the Planning Commission shall render a decision on
the application in the same manner as it considers an appeal. The written
determination shall be made in accordance with the required findings set forth in
Section 18.68.090.
C.If necessary to reach a determination on the request for reasonable
accommodation, the Community and Economic Development Director may
request further information from the applicant consistent with fair housing laws,
specifying in detail the information that is required. In the event that a request for
additional information is made, the thirty (30) day period to issue a decision is
stayed until the applicant responds to the request.
D.A request for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with
another discretionary application shall be reviewed by the authority reviewing the
discretionary land use application. The written determination on whether to grant
or deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made by the
applicable reviewing authority in compliance with the applicable review procedure
for the discretionary review. The written determination to grant or deny the
request for reasonable accommodation shall be made in accordance with
Section 18.68.090 of this article.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 16 of 28
E.A reasonable accommodation that is granted pursuant to this chapter shall not
require the approval of any variance as the reasonable accommodation.
F.The reasonable accommodation shall be subject to any reasonable conditions
imposed on the approval that are consistent with the purposes of this chapter to
further fair housing. Such conditions may generally include, but are not limited to
the following restrictions:
1.That the reasonable accommodation shall only be applicable to particular
individual(s);
2.That the reasonable accommodation shall only be applicable to the
specific use for which application is made; and/or
3.That any change in use or circumstances which negates the basis for the
granting of the approval shall render the reasonable accommodation null
and void and/or revocable by the city.
4.That any removable structures or physical design features that are
constructed or installed in association with the reasonable accommodation
be removed once those structures or physical design features are
unnecessary to provide access to the dwelling unit for the current
occupants.
Section 18.68.090 Findings
A.Approval shall be based upon the following findings, which shall be made by the
by the approval authority in approving or denying the application:
1.The person who will use the subject property is protected under the fair
housing laws;
2.The requested exception to the zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or
policy is necessary to make specific housing available to persons
occupying the subject property;
3.The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or
administrative burden on the city; and
4.The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration of
the city's zoning laws, policies and/or procedures.
5.That alternative reasonable accommodations which may provide an
equivalent level of benefit have been considered, and are not feasible.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 17 of 28
Section 18.68.100 Appeals
A.Within ten days of the date of the Community and Economic Development
Director’s written decision, an individual may appeal an adverse decision.
Appeals from the adverse decision shall be made in writing and submitted to the
Community and Economic Development Department.
B.All appeals shall contain a statement of the grounds for the appeal. Any
information related to a disability status and identified by an applicant as
confidential shall be retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of
the applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection.
C.The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the appeal. The
decision of the Planning Commission shall be final. A written decision of the
Planning Commission or accessibility standards board of appeals shall be mailed
to the appealing party within ten days of the appeal hearing.
D.If an individual needs assistance in filing an appeal on an adverse decision, the
city will provide assistance to ensure that the appeals process is accessible.
Section 18.68.110 Expirations and Extensions
A.The approval of a reasonable accommodation request shall expire one (1) year
from the date of its approval, unless one of the following occurs:
1.The occupancy, use or construction authorized by the decision has been
inaugurated. For the purposes of this section, the term "inaugurated" shall
mean that applicable grading and building permits have been issued, and
that substantial work has been performed and substantial liabilities have
been incurred in good faith reliance on such permits.
2.The applicant has complied with all applicable conditions of approval.
D.In case the applicant is not able to comply with subparagraphs 1 or 2, above,
then the applicant may apply to the Community and Economic Development
Department for an extension, a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the expiration
date. The Director may, upon application by the applicant, extend the period of
approval for a length of time of up to one (1) additional year.
SECTION 23.Chapter 18.69 (Second Family Units)of the Municipal Code is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 18.69
SECOND FAMILY UNITS
Sections:
18.69.010 Purpose
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 18 of 28
18.69.020 Definition
18.69.030 Permitted location
18.69.040 Site development standards
18.69.050 Special regulations
18.69.060 Off-street parking
18.69.070 Approval criteria
18.69.080 Administrative and non-administrative conditional use permits
Section 18.69.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the placement of second
family units and to ensure the placement of such a unit is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and single family units.
Section 18.69.020 Definition
"Second family unit" means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which
provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include
permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same
parcel as the single family dwelling is situated.
Section 18.69.030 Permitted location
Second-family units are permitted in any single family or multi-family residential zone
district subject to the approval of the Administrative Site and Architectural Review Board
and/or Director as set forth in Chapter 18.63 of this Zoning Code..
Section 18.69.040 Site development standards
Site development standards for second-family units shall be the same as those required
in Chapter 18.10 for the appropriate residential district except where the special
regulations listed in Section 18.69.050 are in conflict with those in Chapter 18.10. In
such cases the standards listed in Section 18.69.050 shall apply.
Section 18.69.050 Special regulations
All second-family units shall be subject to the following regulations:
A.The lot size shall be a minimum of one and one-half times the minimum lot size
of the underlying zone district. If a parcel with a second dwelling unit is subsequently
subdivided, the city may require the second dwelling unit be moved if proper setbacks
and other development standards cannot be met.
B. The floor area of the second-family unit, excluding the garage, shall not exceed
thirty percent of the living area of the existing main dwelling where the unit is attached
excepting that on lots twenty-five percent greater than minimum required area or larger,
on a case by case review, the Community and Economic Development Director may
permit a greater percentage of the living area as long as it is determined that there will
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 19 of 28
be no adverse effects on adjacent parcels or the community. If the Director cannot
make such a determination, the matter may be referred to the Planning Commission per
Section 18.69.080. In addition, the floor area of the second-family unit shall not exceed
ten percent of the subject site where the unit is detached. In no instance shall any
second-family unit exceed one thousand two hundred square feet in size nor be smaller
than an area to provide for an "efficiency unit" as defined by the California Building
Code.
C.Any single-family detached dwelling regardless of size of the living area may
have at least an attached "efficiency unit" as defined by the California Building Code
provided all other requirements of this ordinance codified in this chapter are met.
D.A detached second dwelling shall be limited in height to a single story 20-foot
high building.
E.A detached second dwelling unit shall have a minimum wall separation from the
primary dwelling of 15 feet.
F.One of the two dwellings, either the primary or second dwelling, must be
occupied by the owner of the property.
G.A manufactured home on a permanent foundation may be used as a second-
family unit provided said manufactured home meets the requirements of Chapter 18.66
of this title.
H.The second-family unit shall conform to the color, materials, architectural style,
and detailing of the main residence and shall meet all other applicable building code
requirements and development standards of the zone for single-family residential
structures and accessory structures.
I.A second-family unit shall not be located on a parcel upon which there is located
more than one dwelling unit.
J.A second-family unit project shall provide for landscape compensation for any
removed trees or shrubs.
K.The second-family unit may be rented but shall not be sold, transferred or
assigned separately from the main single-family dwelling.
L.A maximum of one second-family unit shall be permitted on a lot.
M.If one of the two dwellings is no longer owner occupied for any period longer than
60 days, one of the two dwellings is required to be converted to accessory living
quarters or a guest house, and kitchen facilities shall be removed.
N.Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the second dwelling, a covenant on
the property shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorder’s Office,
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 20 of 28
subject to City approval, to restrict the property with the requirements of this section.
This use restriction shall be binding upon any successor in ownership of the property.
Section 18.69.060 Off-street parking
In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.60 for the main single-family residence,
one parking space shall be provided for the second-family unit or one per each bedroom
in the unit, whichever results in the greatest number of spaces being required. The
required parking space for the second-family unit shall be enclosed and located on the
same lot as the second-family unit, and shall meet the design standards of Chapter
18.60 (Off-street Parking).
Section 18.69.070 Approval criteria
In addition to the findings required in Chapter 18.63 for administrative site and
architectural review, the Community and Economic Development Director shall approve
a second-family unit only if the following findings can be made:
A.The addition is nicely integrated into the "house envelope" and/or the site
improving the appearance of the main residence and being an asset to the property.
B.The second-family unit is clearly subordinate in size, location, appearance and
access to the main residence unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission
following a public hearing.
C.The second-family unit will not be detrimental to the general health, safety,
morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing within the neighborhood of
the proposed unit or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within
the city.”
SECTION 24.Chapter 18.78 (Emergency Shelters) is added to the Municipal
Code,as follows:
“CHAPTER 18.78
EMERGENCY SHELTERS
Sections:
18.78.010 Purpose
18.78.020 Review Procedures
18.78.030 Location Restrictions
18.78.040 Development Standards
18.78.050 Operational Standards
18.78.060 Compliance with Other Applicable Codes
18.78.070 Denial of an Emergency Shelter
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 178
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 21 of 28
Section 18.78.010 Purpose
In accordance with the authority granted in Section 65583 of the California Government
Code, this chapter provides the standards for the establishment and operation of
emergency shelters.
Section 18.78.020 Review Procedures
Emergency shelters, as defined in Section 18.06.278, shall be permitted in the M2-
Industrial zone district, subject to Site and Architectural Review, which shall be limited to
design review only. The City shall not require a Conditional Use Permit or other
discretionary permit for the construction of an emergency shelter.
Section 18.78.030 Location Restrictions
A.An emergency shelter shall be located at least 300 feet from any other
emergency shelter.
B.The distance of separation shall be measured in a straight line between the
property lines of each use without regard to intervening structures, objects, or city
limit lines.
Section 18.78.040 Development Standards
A.Each emergency shelter may have a maximum of 25 beds, with at least 35
square feet of sleeping area per bed.
B.Each emergency shelter shall provide a client waiting and intake area of at least
10 square feet per bed but at least 200 square feet in total floor area. The intake
waiting area shall be in a location not visible from the adjacent right of way. If
located at the exterior of a building, the area shall be visually separated from
public view by a six foot high decorative masonry wall and shall be covered for
shade and rain considerations.
C.Living, dining, and kitchen areas shall be physically separated from sleeping
areas.
D.Each emergency shelter shall provide facilities for personal care (i.e., bathroom
and shower facilities).
E.The shelter shall provide landline telephone services separate from the office
phone in order to provide privacy. Any payphones provided shall allow call-out
service only.
F.One parking space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided,
unless it is demonstrated that a different parking ratio is appropriate based upon
the submittal and approval of a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic
engineer to justify the provision of a lesser number of spaces than that required
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 179
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 22 of 28
by this section, based on shared use of spaces, the nature of the use, or other
factors.
1.The design of off street parking facilities shall comply with Chapter 18.60
Off-Street Parking.
2.Non operational and unregistered vehicles shall not be kept on site and
towing shall be the responsibility of the shelter operator.
G.Parking and outdoor facilities shall be designed to provide security for residents,
visitors and employees.
H.The facility and/or the premises shall be accessed by one entrance.
I.Adequate external lighting shall be provided for security purposes. The lighting
shall be stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjacent properties and
public rights-of-way, and of an intensity that is compatible with the neighborhood.
J.Trash enclosures and refuse areas shall be provided.
Section 18.78.050 Operational Standards
A.The maximum length of stay shall be 180 days within 365 consecutive days.
B.The provider shall prepare and file a management plan with the City that includes
clear operational rules and standards, including, but not limited to, standards
governing expulsions and lights out, security, screening of residents to ensure
compatibility with services provided at the shelter.
1.Staff and services shall be provided to assist residents to obtain
permanent shelter and income. Supplemental services (e.g., food,
counseling, access to other social programs, etc.) may be offered on the
inside of the premises.
C.At least one facility supervisor/manager shall be on-site at all hours that the
facility is open. Additional support staff shall be provided, as necessary, to
ensure that at least one staff member is provided in all segregated sleeping
areas, as appropriate.
D.The operator shall provide information about how to contact the operator with
questions or concerns regarding shelter operations. The contact information shall
be posted on site where it is readily viewable by an employee, shelter inhabitant,
or representative of a governmental agency.
E.Security personnel shall be provided during the hours that the shelter is in
operation.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 180
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 23 of 28
F.The shelter operator shall frequently patrol the surrounding area within 500 feet
to ensure that homeless shelter residents are not congregating in the
neighborhood.
G.The shelter operator shall regularly patrol the area surrounding the shelter site
during hours that the shelter is in operation to ensure that homeless persons who
have been denied access are not congregating in the neighborhood.
H.The owner/operator shall maintain the exterior of the premises, including:
1.Maintaining signs and accessory structures, free of litter and graffiti at all
times;
2.Daily removal of trash from the premises and abutting sidewalks or alleys
within 20 feet of the premises; and
3.Removal of graffiti within 24 hours of notice from the City.
Section 18.78.060 Compliance with Other Applicable Codes
Each emergency shelter operator shall comply with all applicable federal, state and
local codes, including but not limited to, the Building Code, Fire Code, and State
Department of Social Services licensing requirements.
18.78.070 Denial of an Emergency Shelter
A.The City may not disapprove an emergency shelter, or condition the approval of
an emergency shelter in a manner that makes its development infeasible, unless
it makes written findings, based upon substantial evidence in the record, as to
one of the following:
1.The City has met or exceeded the need for emergency shelters as
identified in the housing element.
2.The emergency shelter would have a specific, adverse impact upon the
public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily
mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the
development of the emergency shelter financially infeasible. As used in
this subsection, a “specific, adverse impact” means a significant,
quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified
written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they
existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
3.The denial of the project or imposition of conditions is required in order to
comply with specific State or Federal law, and there is no feasible method
to comply without rendering the development of the emergency shelter
financially infeasible.”
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 24 of 28
SECTION 25.Chapter 18.82 (Standards for Specified Land Use Activities) is
added to the Municipal Code, as follows:
”Chapter 18.82
STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIED LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES
Sections:
18.82.010 Residential Care Facilities
18.82.020 Transitional and Supportive Housing and Single Room Occupancy
Facilities
Section 18.82.010 Residential Care Facilities
A. Purpose. This Section provides standards for the establishment and operation of
residential care facilities.
B.Applicability. The standards in this Chapter apply to residential, group or
community care facilities where allowed in compliance with Chapter 18.10 (Residential
Zones).
C.Development and Operational Standards
1.Residential care facilities serving 6 or fewer persons. Each residential care
facility shall conform to the property development standards for the land use zoning
district in which it is located.
2.Residential care facilities serving 7 or more persons.
a.Applicable land use zoning district development standards. Each
residential care facility shall conform to the property development standards for the land
use zoning district in which it is located.
b.Additional Application Filing Requirements. The following
information shall accompany the Conditional Use Permit application for a residential
care facility:
i.Client profile (the subgroup of the population of the facility is
intended to serve such as single men, families, elderly, minor children, developmentally
disabled, etc.);
ii.Maximum number of occupants and hours of facility
operation;
iii.Term of client stay;
iv.Support services to be provided on-site and projected
staffing levels; and
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 182
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 25 of 28
v.Rules of conduct and/or management plan.
c.Separation. Residential care facilities shall not be located within
300 feet of another similar facility, except that the separation requirement shall be
increased to 1,000 feet, as measured from the nearest outside building walls where the
other use is a parolee/probationer or sober living home.
d.Walls. Residential care facilities shall provide a 6-foot high solid
decorative block wall along all property lines, except in the front yard. Walls shall
provide for safety with controlled points of entry and shall incorporate decorative
materials and features.
e.Landscaping. On-site landscaping shall be regularly maintained,
including providing irrigation.
f.Outdoor lighting. Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 18.60
(Off-Street Parking).
g.Parking. All garage and driveway spaces associated the Facility
shall, at all times, be available for the parking of vehicles. The precise number of
parking spaces required will be determined by the operating characteristics of the
specific proposal.
h.Signs. No commercial identification signs shall be allowed within a
residential land use zoning district.
i.Sleeping areas. No room commonly used for other purposes shall
be used as a sleeping room for any resident, visitor, or staff person. This includes any
hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage, storage area, shed or similar detached building.
j.Fire Department requirements. Each residential care facility shall
provide fire extinguishers and smoke detector devices and shall meet all standards
established by the Fire Chief.
k.Noise. Outdoor activities shall be conducted only between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
l.Applicable health and safety regulations. Residential care facilities
shall be operated in compliance with applicable State and local health and safety
regulations.
m.Required permits and licenses. Residential care facilities shall be in
conformance with the California Building Code. A certificate of occupancy shall be
obtained from the Building and Safety Division before occupancy of residential care
facilities.
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 183
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 26 of 28
Section 18.82.020 –Transitional and Supportive Housing, and Single Room
Occupancy Facilities
A. In addition to the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit and Section 18.82.010
(Residential Care Facilities) transitional shelter housing and single room occupancy
uses shall comply with the following:
1.Occupancy. No more than one (1) federal, state or youth authority
parolees shall be allowed to live in the transitional and supportive housing or single
room occupancy facility.
2.Number of Occupants. The California Building Code shall determine the
number of occupants in transitional and supportive housing or single room occupancy
facility.
2.Application. The Conditional Use Permit application submitted for the use
shall identify whether any tenants are currently federal, state or youth authority
parolees. Owners and or operators of approved transitional and housing facilities, and
single room occupancy facilities shall update the information required by this section
anytime a person that is a federal, state or youth authority parolee is provided
accommodations at a transitional and housing or single room occupancy facility.
3.Crime prevention program. The operator of transitional and supportive
housing, and single room occupancy facilities shall require tenants to sign a crime free
lease addendum as part of their lease or rental agreement. A sample crime free lease
addendum shall be provided by the City. The crime free lease addendum shall provide
that any criminal violations perpetrated by tenants shall be grounds for termination of
the written or oral lease sublease or agreement under which they reside at the
transitional facility.
4.Crime free multi-housing program.The facility's management shall
participate in any formal residential crime prevention program (i.e., Crime Free Multi-
Housing Program) provided by the City or the County of San Bernardino and as
required under the conditional use permit. If the program offers certification then that
certification shall be obtained and maintained in current status.
5. Compliance. Transitional and housing facilities, and single room
occupancy facilities shall be in compliance with all requirements of the Grand Terrace
Zoning Code and their approved Conditional Use Permit at all times. Violation of any
local, state or federal laws by individual tenants while on the premises shall be grounds
for revocation of the permit, including but not limited to, violations of California Penal
Code § 3003.5.
6.Nuisance. No transitional and housing, or single room occupancy facility
shall be maintained as a nuisance.
7.Revocation. Violations of any of the provisions in this section or the
approved Conditional Use Permit authorizing the transitional and housing or single room
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 184
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 27 of 28
occupancy facility shall be grounds for revocation. The procedures for revocation
contained in Chapter 18.83 of this Title shall be followed.”
SECTION 26.The City Council declares that it would have adopted this
ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses,
phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any
portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions
shall remain valid and enforceable.
SECTION 27.This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of
adoption.
SECTION 28.First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 22nd
day of May, 2012 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said
City Council on the 12th day of June,2012.
ATTEST:
__________________________________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
I, Tracey Martinez, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the city
Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 22nd day of May 2012, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
City Attorney
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 185
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
Page 28 of 28
Exhibit 1
Amend the official Zoning Map by changing the zone district from R3-Medium Density
Residential to R3-20 High Density Residential on the following site:
Project Site A (APN 0275-251-04)
6.A.d
Packet Pg. 186
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
From: "R. ROSENKILD" <shellrose@sbcglobal.net>
To: "smolina@cityofgrandterrace.org" <smolina@cityofgrandterrace.org>
Date: 4/5/2012 3:37 PM
Subject: rezoning for high density residential
Dear Planning Commission,
As I may be unable to attend tonight's meeting, I wanted to express my opposition to allowing high-density
residential construction, specifically as would affect the NW corner of Van Buren and Gage Canal area.
While I understand that our city needs revenue, this project will have more costs to our community than
benefits.
First of all, I must say, my family and I do appreciate new construction when it is a necessity. Our son will
be attending the new Grand Terrace High School this year and we are very grateful. However, we do not
feel that apartments are a necessity in this neighborhood.
My 16 year old son, Clayton, expressed it best when he told us the city should not allow one of the oldest
homes in area to be torn down. Perhaps it may surprise the Commission to learn that a member of his
generation would care about history, heritage, and community. We are proud of the fact that he values
preserving the past for this and future generations. As a member of the Grand Terrace Historical and
Cultural Activities Committee, I agree with my son whole-heartedly. Our little community should be proud
of what little bit of history we have been able to keep intact. It should be cherished rather than destroyed.
Finally, we as a family are concerned about the safety issues that most certainly would arise from
high-density housing in the area in question. Traffic problems and the safety of children walking to and
from school-bus stops worry us. We also believe a larger amount of crime is associated with and near
apartments. Of course, many fine people live in them, but we worry that the transitory nature of many
residents may not coincide with pride in the community.
Please consider these issues when making your decision. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Rochelle Rosenkild and family
22407 Franklin St. , Grand Terrace, Ca
6.A.e
Packet Pg. 187
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
O
p
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
E
m
a
i
l
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
1
Michaele Casey
12531 Mirado Ave,
Grand Terrace , ca 92313
909-825-2192
. 40 Years at this address!
Not in my neighborhood! Are you kidding me?
What is going on. I've been here for 40 years, buying my home as a single mom at age 23. This is my
home I will stay in. I feel safe, the neighborhood is quite, crime free. I love hearing the birds sing in the
mornings or evening for that fact. My neighbors have been her for ever also. we are home owners not
renters. Some are original to the build in 1958. The only thing that caused one neighbor to leave was
death of her husband. The new tenants from 1988 are still there.
We love our peace and quite and being in a RESIDENTAL neighborhood.
The idea of bringing in high density apartments is a slap in our face and to out peace and quite. I did not
buy a home near an apartment complex for a reason.
You want to DESTROY our lives for your greed! This is all about tax revenue for a city that did not take
care of itself. Selling rehab homes to Schwab and city employees. You are not going to make us, pay for
your mistakes in managing your money. Do this in your own neighborhood. You are the ones who
would put Eminent Domain into place and take all the horse property homes going down Van Buren to
Mt Vernon and continue your apartments. We mind our own business. Enjoy our town.
Many of us weep as to what you have already destroyed. Most of you were in diapers when we came
here. Our groves are gone, the sweet smell of orange blossoms. Our open land and open
spaces...coming down the freeway past Cooley Ranch use to feel like I lived in the country see the cattle
and the green pastures. Colton destroyed that. Our forefathers have destroyed our town, our fruit
stands, open spaces. You want to pack our 3.5 square miles with people. The face of Grand Terrace has
certainly changed. You goal is to destroy peoples lives. Our plans for retirement.
I have kept my home up, added room, hardwood floors, chiseled travertine tiles, many, many upgrades
in the thousands in order to retire here. My prop 13 taxes. My neighbors are my family.
We are scared to death that you are out to screw us royally. The old adage you can't fight City Hall.
Who are you getting pay offs from? You don't care, it's not in your neighborhood! Not in front of your
face. My kitchen window looks right there to the old Broussard home. I would have to look at this mess
daily. Along Willet, I have a dear friend, Anita Cardona, she doesn't need apt in her back yard, and feel
threatened by the type of people that will be there. Homeowners take care of their property and
homes. They should not be afraid of who is going to jump over their fence.
This type of housing in a residential neighborhood is a disaster for our city. Go look at North San
Bernardino. They did it and these apt bldgs are crime and drug ridden.
6.A.e
Packet Pg. 188
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
O
p
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
E
m
a
i
l
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
2
The new High School is coming to our end of town is enough impact for us. Now you want to destroy our
investments and our sense of security and quiet. Our "Safe" place. YOU do not care about anyone but
yourselves. The HS will bring taggers and "punks" with baggy pants, skateboards, walking the streets at
night. Trust me, they are out at 3 am. I have been privy to this for 40 years. My bedroom window faces
front and at my bed height. I leave the window open and look out at night on my elbows. I smell the
cigarettes these punk kids are smoking, the talking they do Politicians, your all on the take and the pat
on the back. On weekends, there is always some jackass drag racing at 2 am. We call the cops, we won't
tolerate their behaviors. But fill the place to apts....no way. NO NO NO NO!!!
NO NO NO....this cannot happen and no one wants this here. You manage your damn budget and quit
looking for tax income. You know how a terrible traffic accident can destroy a family. This move would
destroy and impact SO many long time residents lives. You're going to create a riot. Yes, we need more
graffiti punks who walk the streets at night going to and fro the apts. We accidently leave our garage
doors open overnight, no one takes a thing. Apt dwellers, there are plenty of apt elsewhere. Just
remember the crime rate increase in the apts down the hill. Having family in law enforcement, who
even patrolled here in GT, they chose to move here because of our city's safety.
Put YOURSELVES in our position. Can we do this to you? We've lived here in peace and now YOU want
to ruin our lives??? We need to follow the money trail. You screwed up, not us. This is not the answer
and is going to ruin our small city. There was 2800 in GT and I've watched it change to what it is. It will
no longer make Money Magazines top places to live. You are going to make this Muscoy!
STOP NOW! NOT IN GRAND TERRACE OR IN ANYONES NEIGHBORHOOD!
THE NEIGHBORS AGREE!
6.A.e
Packet Pg. 189
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
O
p
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
E
m
a
i
l
s
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Community and Economic Development Department
Negative Declaration
Date: March 7, 2011
Project Title: General Plan Amendment 12-01, Zone Change 12-01 and Zoning
Code Amendment 12-01
Project Location: The re-designations apply to 11695 Canal Street (APN 0275-251-04),
and the northwest corner of Van Buren Street and the Gage Canal (APN 1167-341-02 and -
78). The regulatory changes apply city-wide
Description of Project: A proposal to amend the General Plan, Zoning Map and Zoning
Code to implement adopted Housing Element Programs and to allow for density bonuses
consistent with the City’s Planned Residential Development Ordinance. Most of the Programs
result in regulatory changes to the Zoning Code as it relates to the provision of various housing
types consistent with State law. The Project includes, but is not limited to, a general plan
amendment from Medium Density Residential (MDR) to Medium High Density Residential
(MHDR); a zone change from R3-Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) to a new zoning
classification entitled R3-20 High Density Residential (20 du/ac) on 2.52 acres of land; and
establishment of a new R3-20 High Density Residential zone district.
Project Proponent: City of Grand Terrace, Community and Economic Development
Department
Lead Agency: City of Grand Terrace, Community and Economic Development
Department
Contact Person: Sandra Molina, Senior Planner
(909) 430-2247
Public Hearing: Planning Commission – April 5, 2012
City Council Meeting – Anticipated April 24, 2012
Environmental Finding: On the basis of the Initial Study prepared for the project, it has
been determined that the project would not have a potentially significant effect on the
environment. A copy of said Initial Study is available for review from March 8, 2012 to March
28, 2012 at the Community and Economic Development Department, 22795 Barton Road,
Grand Terrace, California 92313. This document constitutes a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Prior to the Public Hearing, the public is invited to submit written comments on this Mitigated
Negative Declaration during the public review period to the Community and Economic
Development Department, City of Grand Terrace, Grand Terrace, California 92313.
Telephone: (909) 430-2218, Facsimile: (909) 783-2600, or Email:
smolina@cityofgrandterrace.org. Please refer to the Application Numbers listed above.
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 190
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Negative Declaration
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01, ZCA 12-01
Page 2 of 2
Y:\COMDEV\Zone Change_Amendments\ZCA_12-01\Environmental\Neg Dec_GPA-ZC.doc
Signature: _______________________________
Sandra Molina
Senior Planner
Date: _______________________________
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 191
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
City of Grand Terrace
Community and Economic Development Department
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment 12-01
Zone Change 12-01
Zoning Code Amendment 12-01
2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Grand Terrace
Community & Economic Development Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
3. Contact Person & Sandra Molina, Senior Planner
Phone Number (909) 430-2218
4. Project Location:
Project Site A: 11695 Canal Street (APN 0275-251-04)
Project Site B: North side of Van Buren Street, east of the Gage
Canal (APN’s 167-341-02 and -78)
5. Project Sponsor’s Name: City of Grand Terrace
Community & Economic Development Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
6. Property Owner:
Project Site A: City of Grand Terrace
Project Site B: Darryl and Christine Moore
Kenneth and Kim Catanzarite
7. General Plan Designation:
Existing: Medium Density Residential
Proposed: Medium/High Density Residential
8. Zoning Designation:
Existing: Existing: R3-Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac)
Proposed: R3-20 High Density Residential (20 du/ac)
Page 1 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
9. Description of Project:
The Project consists of amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Use Element, Land
Use Map, Zoning Map, and Zoning Code to implement adopted Housing Element Programs
and the City’s Planned Residential Development (PRD) Ordinance. Attachment 1 lists the
Housing Programs and PRD Ordinance section that identify the changes to the City’s
General Plan and Zoning Code. Most of the Programs result in regulatory changes to the
Zoning Code as it relates to the provision of various housing types consistent with State
law.
Implementation of Program 8.8.1.s, in particular requires amendments to the General Plan
Land Use Map and Element, Zoning Code and Zoning Map. An assessment of the
availability of adequate sites to accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 329 residential units was conducted during the
preparation of the City’s Housing Element. The assessment determined that adequate sites
were needed to accommodate approximately 27 lower income units. In consultation with
the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), it was
determined that the City would be required to re-zone approximately 1.35 acres to a
minimum base density of 20 units per acre in order to adequately satisfy the requirements
of State Housing Law. The City identified five sites that would be suitable for re-zoning to
20 units per acre, and adopted Program 8.8.1.s, which specifically identified two sites that
would be re-designated to permit the higher density. Project Site A and Project Site B are
the two identified sites.
In accordance with Program 8.8.1.s, the Project also proposes to change the General Plan
Land Use designation and Zoning classification of the two sites to allow for a density of 20
units per acre. The Project sites are designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the
adopted General Plan Land Use Map. The General Plan Amendment would change the
Land Use designation to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), and revise the Land
Use Element to expand the purpose of the MHDR designation to include other multiple
family uses, and delete the mandate for a specific plan. The Project sites are classified as
R3-Medium Density Residential (12 dwelling units per acre) on the Zoning Map the sites are
proposed to be re-zoned to a new Zoning classification entitled R3-20 High Density
Residential (20 dwelling units per acre). An amendment to the Zoning Code is also
proposed to establish the new R3-20 zone district.
Project Site A, shown in Figure 1, measures approximately 35,130 square feet (0.81 acres) and
is owned by the City of Grand Terrace. No development of the site is proposed in conjunction
with this General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. However, pending applications to
develop 23 affordable rental housing complex, referred to as Canal Village, were submitted
to the City in November of 2009, were subsequently deemed incomplete in December 2009,
and have remained. It is uncertain whether the Canal Village project will move forward;
nevertheless the City is obligated through its certified Housing Element to re-zone the site
during the current Housing Element cycle. Should the Canal Village Project move forward,
a separate environmental analysis would occur, and it would be premature at this point to
consider the 23-unit project with this General Plan Amendment and Zone Change.
Page 2 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 193
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Project Site B, shown in Figure 2, is made up of two separate privately owned parcels
totaling approximately 74,637 square feet (1.71 acres). One parcel is owned by Kenneth
and Kim Catanzarite and is vacant, and the other is owned by Darryl and Christine Moore
and contains a single family home.
Page 3 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 194
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Figure 1: Project Site A (Approximately 0.81 acres)
Figure 2: Project Site B (Approximately 1.71 acres)
Page 4 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 195
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
10. Project Setting and Surrounding Land Uses:
The City is located in the San Bernardino Valley within San Bernardino County occupying
approximately 3.6 square miles. It is bounded by the Santa Ana River to the northwest, Blue
Mountain to the east, and the City of Colton to the north, east, and west. Main Street marks the
southern limit of the City and coincides with the boundary between San Bernardino and
Riverside counties.
Project site A is a vacant triangular-shaped property. It is generally flat with sparse
vegetation. The Gage Canal property is directly northwest of it, and access to Canal Street,
a public right of way, is through the Gage Canal property. The Highlands Apartments are
on the south and east of the site.
Project Site B is rectangular shaped, and contains one residence. The site is relatively flat
and has ornamental vegetation around the residence. The Gage Canal is to the west of the
site and Van Buren Street, a public roadway, is on the south side. Single family homes are
to the south, east and west (beyond the Canal), and a multiple family uses are to the north
Surrounding land uses, General Plan designation and Zoning are as follows:
Project Site A:
Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses
North R1-7.2 Single Family
Residential
Low Density Residential Vacant
South R3-Medium Density
Residential
Medium Density Residential Highlands
Apartments
East R3-Medium Density
Residential
Medium Density Residential Highlands
Apartments
West R1-7.2 Single Family
Residential
Low Density Residential Vacant
Project Site B:
Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses
North R3-Medium Density
Residential
Medium Density Residential Multiple family
complex
South R1-7.2 Single Family
Residential
Low Density Residential Single family uses
East R3-Medium Density
Residential
Medium Density Residential Single family uses
West R1-7.2 Single Family
Residential
Low Density Residential Gage Canal and
single family
residential
Page 5 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
11. Other public agencies whose approval is required: None
Page 6 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/ Water Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population/Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or
“potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Page 7 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 199
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Page 9 of 42
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify
the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify the state where they are available for
review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above
checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with
Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which
were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to
information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances).
Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate,
include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources
used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 200
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS –Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
a and b: Project Site A is located adjacent to the existing multiple family uses and is bound
by the Gage Canal to the north, which runs underground, followed by Canal Street. Uses
surrounding Project Site B include single family residential uses to the south and east and
multiple family uses to the north. The Gage Canal also runs adjacent (west) to Project Site
B. There are no state or county scenic highways within the City1, nor do the Project Sites
contain any scenic trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings. The proposed re-
designations and textual revisions will not impact a scenic vista or scenic resources.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
c. Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the site
and its surroundings?
The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Zoning Code Amendment will
not substantially degrade the existing visual character of the Project Sites or surroundings.
Views afforded from Project Site A consist of the Highlands Apartments to the south and
east, and Southern California Edison overhead wires to west, followed by the I-215
embankment. Blue Mountain at the east end of the City and is partially obscured by the
existing Highlands Apartments. Views surrounding Project Site B consists of multiple family
uses to the north, and residential to the south, east and west. Views to Blue Mountain are
also partially obscured. No development is proposed in conjunction with the re-designations
or textual changes. Therefore, no visual impact is expected.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
d. Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
1 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Section 4A, April 27, 2011.
Page 10 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 201
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Zoning Code Amendment will not create
any new sources of light. No impact will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources
are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department
of conservation as an optional model used in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
a and b: Project Sites A and B are classified as “urban and built-up land”, according to the
California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
2008 County Maps.2 The Sites are neither zoned, nor intended for agricultural use and are
not subject to a Williamson Act contract. No impact will occur.
The textual changes to the General Plan and Zoning Code that implement the Housing
Programs and PRD Ordinance are regulatory changes which will not adversely impact
agricultural resources.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland zoned
2 California Department of Conservation. http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlrp/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx, site accessed September 29,
2011.
Page 11 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 202
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Timberland Production (as defined
by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-
forest use?
c and d: The Project Sites are small infill sites located in the R3-Medium Density
Residential zone. The Sites do not contain any forested lands. The re-designation of the
Project Sites and the textual changes will not impact forest land or timberland.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
e. Involve other changes to the
existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result
in conversion of Farmland, to non-
agricultural use?
Refer to responses a and b.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
III. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable
air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
Project Site A is 0.81-acres and Project Site B is 1.71 acres. Together, the two sites total
2.52 acres of land with a Medium Density Residential (6-12 du/ac) designation, which is
proposed to be re-designated to Medium/High Density Residential (20 du/ac), and re-zoned
R3-20.
As shown in Table 1 below, the current MDR (12 du/ac) could support a total of 28 dwelling
units and a population of 80 persons (2.83 persons per household). The proposed
Medium/High Density Residential would allow a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre
and could generate approximately 50 dwelling units with a total population of 141 persons
(2.83 persons per household).3 The net increase in density and population is 22 units and
61 persons, respectively.
3 General Plan, Land Use Element, April 27, 2011
Page 12 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 203
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 1. Estimated Dwelling Units and Population
Existing MDR
(6-12 du/ac)
Proposed MHDR
(20 du/ac)
Difference
Project Site A
Acres 0.81 0.81 0
Dwelling Units 9 16 7
Population 26 45 19
Project Site B
Acres 1.71 1.71 0
Dwelling Units 19 34 15
Population 54 96 42
Total
Acres 2.52 2.52 0
Dwelling Units 28 50 22
Population 80 141 61
Source: City of Grand Terrace Land Use Element
(Population calculated at 2.83 persons per household.)
The City is comprised of 2,255.66 acres with the Medium Density Residential (MDR) land
use designation making up 8.23% or 185.7 acres of the total acreage and the Medium/High
Density Residential (MHDR) designation making up just 0.27% or 6 acres of the City’s total
acreage.4 The Project would increase the total acreage designated Medium/High Density
Residential to 8.52 acres or 0.38% of the City’s overall land acreage.
The City is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The air pollution control agency for
the Basin is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is
responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. The SCAQMD and
the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for formulating
and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which has a 20-year horizon
for the Basin. The current regional air quality plan is the Final 2007 Air Quality
Management Plan adopted by the SCAQMD on June 1, 2007.
4 General Plan EIR, Chapter 2, April 27, 2010
Page 13 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 204
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The AQMP for the Basin sets forth a comprehensive program that will lead the Basin into
compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. The AQMP’s control measures
and related emission reduction estimates are based upon emissions projections for a future
development scenario derived from land use, population, and employment characteristics
defined in consultation with local governments. Accordingly, conformance with the AQMP
for development projects is determined by demonstrating compliance with local land use
plans and/or population projections.
The Project would result in a net increase in density and population of 22 dwelling units and
61 persons, respectively. These increases are negligible and do not significantly alter the
land use and employment projections contemplated in the 2007 AQMP, which is based on
the City’s General Plan. The proposed textual changes to the General Plan and Zoning
Code are regulatory for the purposes of implementing the Housing Programs identified in
Attachment 1, and the density bonus provisions of the Planned Residential Development
Ordinance. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
b. Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing
or projected air quality violation?
c. Result in cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
b and c: As discussed above, the Project does not include any site development or new
uses therefore, no air quality impacts will occur. The re-designation would result in a net
increase of 22 dwelling units and 61 persons at build-out of the General Plan. However, the
increase is negligible over the build-out of the General Plan and would not be considered
cumulative considerable. Future development would be subject to several General Plan
policies that address air quality. Therefore, for purposes of the Project, a less than
significant impact will occur.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
Page 14 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 205
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d. Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors
affecting a substantial number of
people?
d and e: Project Site A is approximately 2,000 feet east of Terrace Hills Elementary School,
approximately 2,000 feet north of Grand Terrace Elementary School and 1,425 feet north of
an assisted care facility. Project Site B is 715 feet west of Terrace Middle High School.
The proposed amendment and text revisions will not create any emissions or odors as no
development is proposed in conjunction with the Project. Therefore, no impact will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations by the Cal Dept. of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect
on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and
Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect
on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
Page 15 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 206
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
hydrological interruption, or other
means?
a through c: Project Sites A and B are small infill parcels with sparse vegetation and a few
trees. There are no water sources on the Sites, and no impacts to riparian habitats or
wetlands would occur. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change/Code
Amendment would re-designate the subject properties to a higher residential density and
would result in textual changes to the General Plan and Zoning Code. The Project does not
include any site development that would result in any site disturbances. Therefore, no
impact to biological resources will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
d. Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
According to Section 4C.1 of the Final EIR prepared for the General Plan, the southeast
corner of the City, the Blue Mountain area, which connects to other mountains to the south,
southeast and southwest, is the only area of substantial open space with the potential for
wildlife corridors to exist.5 The Project Sites are not located on the southwest side of the
City. The re-designations of the Project Sites and proposed regulatory changes to the
Code, will not adversely impact wildlife movement corridors.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
5 Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Section 4C.1, April 27, 2010
Page 16 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 207
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e and f: There are no conservation plans governing Project Sites A or B. The Project
entails a general plan amendment, zone change, and zoning code amendment. No
development is proposed on the Sites. Any future development would be subject to
General Plan policies calling for the conservation and protection of significant biological
resources. No development is proposed in conjunction with the Project; therefore, the
Project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in §
15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
a through d: A cultural records search was conducted in preparation of the Final EIR for the
2010 General Plan Update to determine the extent of previous cultural resources
investigations within the City, and whether any archaeological sites or architectural
resources exist within the City. The search determined that only one site (CA-RIV-7168H)
evaluated as National Register of Historical Place (NRHP) Significant. That site, the Gage
Canal (CA-RIV-7168H) constructed in the 1880s, was essential to the development of the
City and surrounding areas as it allowed a largely arid region to grow into an agricultural
center.6 The Gage Canal bisects the City in a north-south direction, and is owned by the
City of Riverside.
6 General Plan EIR, Chapter D, April 27, 2011
Page 17 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 208
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The Gage Canal is located to the west of both Project Sites. It runs between Project Site A
and Canal Street, and farther south, it runs between Project Site B and existing residences.
In both instances, the Gage Canal is separated from the Project Sites by chain link fencing,
and has been completed filled in and covered with soil.
The proposed general plan amendment and zone change/code amendment will result in an
increase in the permitted density from 6-12 units per acre to 20 units per acre, establish a
new zone district for the increased density, and make textual changes to the General Plan
and Zoning Code. No development is proposed in conjunction with this Project. At such
time as development is proposed, or the pending application moves forward, that project
would be reviewed for potential impacts to cultural resources, if any. The Project, itself,
would not result in any physical changes to the environment that would impact the Gage
Canal.
In accordance with California Government Code 65352.3, the City contacted the Native
American Heritage Commission to solicit a list of California Native Tribes for the purpose of
informing them of the proposed general plan and specific plan amendments. Upon receipt
of the list, staff sent written notifications dated September 29, 2011, to the eight Native
American Tribes notifying them of the Project and asking the Tribes to contact City staff if
consultation would be required. No requests for consultations were received. Consultation
letters were sent to eight Native American Tribes in on April 4, 2010, in association with the
Canal Apartments project that was proposed on Project Site A. One response was received
from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians indicating that the Project site falls within the
bounds of their Tribal Traditional Use Areas; however that the Soboba Band did not have
any specific concerns regarding the Project.7
Therefore, for purposes of this Project, no impact to cultural resources will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
a. Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
7 Letter from Joseph Ontiveros Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, October 18, 2010.
Page 18 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 209
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil?
a and b: (i) and (ii): The San Jacinto fault zone is located two miles southwest of the City
and the San Andreas Fault is approximately 11 miles to the northeast of the City.8 Project
Sites A and B are not located in an area susceptible to liquefaction or landslides.9 No
development is proposed that would be impacted by ground shaking, or result in erosion or
loss of topsoil. Additionally, the textual amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Code
are regulatory changes to City policies and ordinances. Therefore, no impact will occur
related to the Project.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
c. Be located on a geologic unit or
soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or
property?
c and d: The City of Grand Terrace is underlain by alluvial sediments that are largely
composed of granular soils (silty sand, sand, and gravel) that typically are low to very low in
expansion potential. As indicated in the response above, Project Sites A and B are not
8 Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Chapter 4E, April 27, 2010
9 Ibid.
Page 19 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 210
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
located in an area susceptible to liquefaction, subsidence, or landslides. Further, no
physical development is proposed that would be impacted by geological hazards.
Therefore, no impact will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
e. Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
No new development or new uses are proposed with the Project; however, any future
development would be required to connect to the public sewer system. Therefore, no
impact will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Greenhouse gases (GHG) are those gases that have the ability to trap heat in the
atmosphere, a process analogous to the way a greenhouse traps heat. GHG’s may be
emitted as a result of human activities, such as electricity production, vehicle use, etc., or
through natural processes. GHG’s include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, and nitrous
oxide. The most common GHG that results from human activity is carbon dioxide, followed
by methane and nitrous oxide.10 Collectively GHGs are measured as carbon dioxide
equivalent (CO2e).11
California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive
orders regarding greenhouse gases. GHG statues and executive orders (EO) include
10 Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, South Coast Air Quality Management
District, October 2008.
11 Newhall Avenue Family Apartment, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, 2011
Page 20 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 211
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
nits.
Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 1368, Executive Order (EO) S-03-05, EO S-20-06
and EO S-01-07. AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, is one of the
most significant pieces of environmental legislation that California has adopted. Most
notably AB 32 mandates California’s GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. 12
The Project proposes to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Medium
Density Residential (MDR) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), change the Zoning
classification from R3-Medium Density Residential (12 dwelling units per acre) to a new
Zoning classification entitled R3-20 High Density Residential (20 dwelling units per acre),
and amend the Zoning Code to establish the new R3-20 zone district and implement the
changes identified in Attachment 1.
The proposed Project does not include any site development or new uses and will not
generate any direct GHG emissions. The Project would allow the two infill Sites to be
developed at a higher density than currently allowed. As shown in Table 1, rather than 28
dwelling units with an anticipated population of 80 people, 50 units with a population of 141
people could be constructed under the proposed base density of 20 dwelling units per
acre.13 This represents an additional 61 people and 22 units than considered at General
Plan build-out.
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCQAMD) has published a “Draft
Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold”.
This document establishes a draft GHG Significance Threshold for projects where the
SCAQMD is the lead agency. The SCAQMD’s draft GHG Significance Threshold
establishes a 5-tier threshold flowchart, with Tier 3 identifying small projects that would not
likely contribute to significant GHG impacts. Tier 3 identified screening thresholds of 10,000
metric tons per year (MT/yr) of CO2e for stationary source industrial projects (adopted by
the SCAQMD Board) and 3,000 MT/yr of CO2e for commercial and residential projects. For
purposes of this analysis the preliminary recommendation of a screening threshold of 3,000
MT/yr CO2e will be used.14
A series of sensitivity analyses were performed by SCAQMD staff to assess the likely
project size for 3,000 MT/yr CO2e. As a result of the analysis, the screening level of
3,000 MT/yr CO2e would capture development projects less than 70 single family dwelling 15u
12 Ibid.
13 General Plan Land Use Element, April 27, 2010
14 Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, South Coast Air Quality
Management District, October 2008
15 Ibid.
Page 21 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 212
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
dwelling units, would be
xpected to fall below the screening threshold of 3,000 MT/yr CO2e. Thus, a less than
S MATERIALS – Would the project:
through
e routine transport, use, or disposal
involving the
ode. No hazardous materials will
e used, transported or disposed of, and there is no risk of any release of hazardous
ill occur.
tion required.
es, or
It would be speculative to attempt to estimate GHG emissions that could be generated at
the time that future development of the site is contemplated. However, for comparison
purposes, a GHG Assessment performed for a 61-unit multiple family project with
commercial office space on 1.26 acres estimated GHG emissions of 2,083 MT/yr CO2e16,
and a GHG analysis performed for a 42-unit multiple family affordable housing project on
2.6 acres estimated emissions at 829 MT/yr CO2e17. Therefore, it would be reasonable to
expect that the proposed Project, which could generate 50
e
significant impact is expected to occur as a result of the Project.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOU
a. Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment
th
of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
a and b: The proposed general plan amendment, zone change and zoning code
amendments do not propose any new uses or development, nor emit any emissions,
hazardous or otherwise. Project Sites A and B will result in a residential density increase
and the textual revisions to the general plan and zoning c
b
substances or materials. Therefore, no impact w
Finding: No Impact. No mitiga
c. Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substanc
waste within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
16 Newhall Avenue Family Apartment, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, 2011
17 City of Big Bear Lake, Crossings at Big Bear Lake Final Environmental Impact Report, 2009
Page 22 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Terrace Hills Middle School
chool (0.60 miles). However, no aspect of
ct will occur.
tion required.
t, would it create a
ignificant hazard to the public or the
epartment of Toxic Substance Control
t compiled pursuant to Government Code
r.
s requ .
sult
a safety hazard for people
d use plan or within two miles 19 occur as a result of the General Plan
nt.
Project Site A is located approximately 0.36 miles from both Grand Terrace and Terrace
iew Elementary Schools. Project Area B is in proximity to V
(0.14 miles) and proposed Grand Terrace High S
he Project will create any emissions and no impat
Finding: No Impact. No mitiga
d. Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5
nd, as a resula
s
environment?
roject Sites A and B are not included on the DP
(DTSC), Hazardous Waste and Substance Site Lis
ection 65962.5.18 Therefore, no impact will occuS
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation i
e. For a project located within an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public
se airport, would the project re
ired
u
in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project
result in
residing or working in the project
area?
and f: No portion of the City is located within an airport lane
of a public or private airport. No impact will
mendment, Zone Change or Zoning Code AmendmeA
18 California Department of Toxic Substance Control, EnviroStor Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List Database website,
accessed on October 4, 2011.
19 General Plan EIR, Appendix A, April 27, 2010,
Page 23 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 214
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
is required.
s or
vacuation does not exist. Future development will be evaluated by the City’s Traffic
quate emergency
ccess is provided and maintained. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur.
pact. No mitigation is required.
a
roximity to a designated Very High Fire Hazard
everity Zone. In addition, no development or new uses are proposed with the Project.
mendments, will create the potential for a
ignificant impact related to wildland fires.
tigation is required.
Y AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
. Violate any water quality
at
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
g. Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Project Site A is bound on the west by property owned by the City of Riverside containing
the Gage Canal, which is underground. The City of Riverside property is approximately 50
feet wide and beyond that is Canal Street, an improved public street. Project Site A would
access Canal Street via the City of Riverside property. Project Site B has direct access to
Van Buren Street, an improved public street. Since no traffic will be generated as a result of
the legislative changes, the potential for an adverse impact to emergency response
e
Engineer and San Bernardino County Fire Department to ensure that ade
a
Finding: Less Than a Significant Im
h. Expose people or structures to
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands?
Project Sites A and B are not located in p20S
No aspect of the Project, including the regulatory a
s
Finding: No Impact. No mi
IX. HYDROLOG
a
standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such th
20 General Plan EIR, Chapter 4F, April 27, 2010,
Page 24 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 215
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
quifer
vel
neral Manager Don Hough, who indicated
o opposition to the general plan amendment and zone change, but that any future
ted for water availability.21 Therefore, for
e purposes of this Project, no impact will occur.
is required.
ea,
a stream or river, in a
anner which would result in a
g
a,
ally increase the rate or
per acre, as opposed to the current
ensity of 12 units per acre, and establish a new zoning district for the increased density.
there would be a net deficit in a
volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a le
which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
No development of the Project Sites is proposed in conjunction with the legislative changes
that implement the revisions identified in Attachment 1. Therefore, the Project will not
violate water quality or discharge requirements. Additionally, the re-designations were
evaluated by Riverside Highland Water District Ge
n
development on the Sites would need to be evalua
th
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
c. Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or ar
including through the alteration of the
course of
m
substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
d. Substantially alter the existin
drainage pattern of the site or are
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substanti
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
off-site?
c and d: The Project Sites are relatively flat and do not contain any water courses. The
proposed general plan amendment and zone change/code amendment will allow multiple
family development at a density of 20 dwelling units
d
21 Letter from Riverside Highland Water Company General Manager Don Hough dated November 2, 2011.
Page 25 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
o development is proposed in conjunction with the Project, therefore, no erosion or
pact wil cur.
tion is required.
er
eed the capacity of
l sources of
o aspect of the Project will impact to stormwater facilities or systems, or create runoff. No
pact. No mitigation is required.
is required.
ear
ood hazard area as mapped on a
deral Flood Hazard Boundary or
se people or structures to a
ject Site A is vacant of structures, and Project Site B contains an existing
residence. However, neither Project Site is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, nor are
es that would create significant risk of
N
flooding will occur. Therefore, no im
Finding: No Impact. No mitiga
e. Create or contribute runoff wat
which would exc
l oc
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
ubstantial additionas
polluted runoff.
N
impact will occur.
Finding: No Im
f. Otherwise substantially degrade
ater quality?
w
Refer to IX.a.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
g. Place housing within a 100-y
fl
fe
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
h. Place within 100-year flood hazard
area structures which would impede
or redirect flood flows?
i. Expo
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding
as a result of the failure of a levee or
dam?
g through i: Pro
there major dams or levees in proximity to the Sit
Page 26 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ooding if they were to fail.22 Therefore, no adverse flooding impact to housing or structures
is requ .
he City is not exposed to conditions triggering inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow;
AND PLANNING – Would the project:
erties to a higher residential density and would result in textual changes to the
eneral Plan and Zoning Code. No aspect of the Project will divide an established
is requ .
d
ited to
the purpose
fl
will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
ired
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?
T
therefore, no impact will occur.23
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
X. LAND USE
a. Physically divide an established
community?
Project Site A is vacant and Project Site B contains an existing residence. The proposed
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change/Code Amendment would re-designate the
subject prop
G
community.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
b. Conflict with any applicable lan
use plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not lim
the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for
ired
of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
The Project is being undertaken in accordance with the City’s certified 2008-2014 Housing
Element, including Program 8.8.1.s, which calls for the re-designation of the Project Sites to
a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The concurrent zone change and code
amendment to establish the R3-20 zone district that would allow multiple family
development at 20 units per acre would ensure internally consistency. The textual changes
to the zoning code and general plan are regulatory and bring the City’s policies and
22 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Chapter 4G, April 27, 2010
23 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Appendix A, April 27, 2010
Page 27 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
gulations into compliance with Housing Law. Additionally, the amendment to the land use
al Ordinance.
y’s Zoning Code or General Plan, and no
pact will occur.
igation is required.
l community conservation plans within the
ity, therefore, no impact will occur.
is requ .
oject:
vailability of
known mineral resource that would
nt mineral resource
identified in the City.24 Therefore, no
pact will occur.
gation is required.
in:
xcess
s established in the local
eneral plan or noise ordinance, or
re
element will also include language relating to the density bonus provisions contained in the
Planned Residenti
Therefore, the project does not conflict with the Cit
im
Finding: No impact. No mit
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural
ommunity conservation plan?
c
There are no habitat conservation plans or natura
C
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
Xl. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the pr
a. Result in the loss of a
ired
a
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of
a locally importa
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
nd use plan? la
a and b: No significant mineral resources have been
im
Finding: No Impact. No miti
XII. NOISE – Would the project result
a. Exposure of persons to or
generation of noise levels in e
of standard
g
applicable standards of other
agencies?
24 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, Appendix A, April 27, 2010
Page 28 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
eneration of excessive
ial permanent increase
ambient noise levels in the project
ithout
y persons
noise levels or groundbourne noise or vibration, as no development is proposed. Any
General Plan policies relating to
oise. Therefore, for purposes of the Project, no impact to resources will occur.
is required.
in
ld the project expose
eople residing or working in the
irstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
b. Exposure of persons to or
g
groundbourne vibration or
groundbourne noise levels?
c. A substant
in
vicinity above levels existing w
the project?
d. A substantial temporary or
periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
a through d: The Project proposes to change the General Plan Land Use designation from
Medium Density Residential (MDR) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), change
the Zoning classification from R3-Medium Density Residential (12 dwelling units per acre) to
a new Zoning classification entitled R3-20 High Density Residential (20 dwelling units per
acre), and amend the Zoning Code to establish the new R3-20 zone district. It will also
make textual changes to the General Plan and Zoning Code that implement the housing-
related revisions listed in Attachment 1. The Project, itself, would not expose an
to
future development of the site is required to comply with
n
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation
e. For a project located within an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, with
two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, wou
p
project area to excessive noise
levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a
private a
Page 29 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 220
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e and f: No portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles
of a public or private airport.25 Therefore, no airport related noise impacts will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
a. Include substantial population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads
or other infrastructure)?
The Project would result in taking 2.52 acres of land with a Medium Density Residential
(6-12 du/ac) Land Use designation, and re-designating the land to Medium/High Density
Residential (20 du/ac).
The current Medium Density designation, which allows a density of up to 12 dwelling units
per acre could support approximately 28 dwelling units and a population of 80 (2.83 persons
per household). The proposed Medium/High Density Residential designation would allow a
density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre and would generate approximately 50 dwelling
units with a total population of 141 persons (2.83 persons per household).26 The net
increase in density and population over general plan build out would be 22 dwelling units
and 61 persons, respectively.
This increase is negligible over build-out of the General Plan and would not induce
substantial population growth.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
b. Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
25 General Plan EIR, Appendix A, April 27, 2010,
26 General Plan, Land Use Element, April 27, 2011
Page 30 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b and c: Project Site A is vacant and Project Site B contains an existing residence. The
proposed general plan amendment and zone change/code amendment will result in an
increase in the permitted density from 6-12 units per acre to 20 units per acre, change the
general plan designation to MHDR, establish a new R3-20 zone district for the increased
density, and make textual changes to the General Plan and Zoning Code. No development
is proposed which would adversely impact the existing residence on Site B. Additionally,
since Site B is made up of two parcels, development could occur in the future, without
impacting the existing residence. Therefore, for the purposes of this Project, a less than
significant impact will occur.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in
substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?
The proposed Project would change the General Plan Land Use designation and zoning of
2.52 acres of land from Medium Density Residential (12 du/ac) to Medium/High Density
Residential (20 du/ac), remove the limitation of uses for the Medium High Density
Residential land use designation to allow non-senior multiple housing, establish a new
residential zone district that allows the 20 du/ac density, and amend the Zoning Code in
accordance with the Housing Programs listed in Attachment 1.
Page 31 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Based on the proposed density approximately 50 dwelling units with a total population of
141 persons (2.83 persons per household) could develop on the site. This would result in a
net increase in density and population of 22 dwelling units (0.39%) and 61 persons (0.39%),
respectively over build out of the General Plan.27 While any future development will require
public services, the net increase in population and dwelling units at build-out of the General
Plan is nominal and is not expected to generate substantial adverse impacts to public
services. Additionally, future development is subject to the City’s Development Impact Fee
program, which assesses impact fees related to traffic signals, circulation, storm drainage,
general facilities, public use facilities, and parkland; and sewer usage fees28. Therefore, a
less than significant impact to public services will occur related to the increase in density.
Findings: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
XV. RECREATION
a. Would the project increase the use
of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include
recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
a and b: The proposed Project would result in a net increase in population of 61 (0.39%)
persons over build-out of the General Plan. The increase is negligible and would not
adversely impact existing recreation facilities nor create a need for additional resources
since multiple family projects typically provide some level of onsite amenities that would
serve project residents. Additionally, any future development is subject to the payment of
Parkland Impact fees.29 Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
27 General Plan, Land Use Element, April 27, 2011
28 Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Title 4, Chapters 4.72, 4.80 , and 4.104, 1984, and as amended
29 Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Title 4, Chapters 4.80, 1984, and as amended
Page 32 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 223
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. TRANSPORATION/TRAFFIC –Would the project:
a. Cause an increase in traffic which
is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of
the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume
to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b. Conflict with an applicable
congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of
service standards and travel demand
measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated
roads or highways?
The proposed Project would change the General Plan Land Use designation and zoning of
Project Sites A and B from Medium Density Residential (6-12 du/ac) to Medium/High
Density Residential (20 du/ac), remove the limitation of uses for the Medium High Density
Residential land use designation to allow non-senior multiple housing, establish a new
residential zone district that allows the 20 du/ac density, and amend the Zoning Code in
accordance with adopted Housing Programs.
According to the General Plan EIR, both Canal and Van Buren Streets are anticipated to
operate at LOS A at build-out of the General Plan.30 Table 2 below shows the expected
peak hour and daily vehicle trips that would be generated for each Project Site and the total
expected peak hour and daily vehicle trips for both Project Sites (city-wide trip generation)
combined in comparison to the existing land use density. Project Site A, at a density of 20
units per acre would generate 3.57 more AM peak hour trips and 4.34 PM peak hour trips
than the existing designation would. Project Site B could generate 7.65 more AM peak hour
trips and 9.3 more PM peak hour trips than the existing designation would. Generally, AM
peak hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and PM peak hours are from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.
The potential net increase in peak hour trip generation is minimal and would not adversely
impact traffic/transportation systems or conflict with the County congestion management
program.
30 General Plan EIR, April 27, 2010
Page 33 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 224
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The remaining of the General Plan and Zoning Code revisions included in the Project are
regulatory and would not generate traffic.
Table 2. Expected Vehicle Trip Generation
Peak Hour Land Use No. of Units AM PM Daily
Project Site A
Existing MDR 9 4.59 5.58 59.85
Proposed MHDR 16 8.16 9.92 106.4
Difference 7 3.57 4.34 46.5
Project Site B
Existing MDR 19 9.69 11.78 126.35
Proposed MHDR 34 17.34 21.08 226.1
Difference 15 7.65 9.3 99.75
Project Sites A & B (City-wide trip generation)
Existing MDR 28 14.28 17.36 186.2
Proposed MHDR 50 25.5 31 332.5
Difference 22 11.22 13.64 146.3
Source: Trip Generation Manual, 8th Ed. By Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
c. Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial
safety risks?
No portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a
public or private airport.31 Therefore, no impact will occur.
31 Ibid.
Page 34 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 225
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
d. Substantially increase hazards
due to a design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency
access?
d and e: The proposed Project includes legislative changes to the City’s General Plan and
Zoning Code. No development is proposed so no impact to access or creation of design
hazards will occur. Future development of the site will be evaluated to ensure that all
access points are adequately designed, and to ensure emergency access. However, for
the purposes of this Project, no impact would occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
f. Result in inadequate parking
capacity?
A component of the Project includes a revision to the parking requirements for multiple
family uses, based on the number of bedrooms. The current standard is two parking
spaces per dwelling unit. As proposed, an efficiency or one bedroom unit would require
only one parking space, two to three bedroom units require two spaces, and four or more
bedroom dwellings require three parking spaces. The revision would more accurately
reflect parking demand based on intensity/occupancy of the dwelling unit. No other
component of the Project is anticipated to negatively impact parking demand.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
g. Conflict with adopted policies,
plans, or programs regarding public
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
facilities, or otherwise decrease the
performance or safety of such
facilities?
No aspect of the Project will adversely impact plans, policies or programs related to
alternative methods of transportation, including pedestrian facilities. Therefore, no impact
will be created.
Page 35 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 226
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS – Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Board?
b. Require or result in the
construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the
construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant
environmental effects?
a through c: The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Zoning Code
Amendment will result in a reclassification of the General Plan Land Use and Zoning
designations on 2.52 acres of land to allow for a density of 20 units per acre. Other
changes include amending the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Code in order
to implement adopted Housing Programs and the City’s PRD Ordinance. Because there is
no development, the Project will not impact RWQCB wastewater requirements, nor will it
require construction or expansion of new wastewater or storm water facilities. Additionally,
the Project would result in a net increase of 22 dwelling units and 61 persons at general
plan build-out. This increase is negligible and would not impact wastewater or storm water
facilities. Therefore, no impact will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
d. Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources,
or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
The proposed Project will not require the use of water. The proposed General plan and
zoning re-classifications will result in an insignificant increase of 22 additional dwelling units
Page 36 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 227
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
and 61 persons over build-out of the General Plan. This increase is not expected to
adversely affect water supplies or require new entitlements. Additionally, the re-
designations were evaluated by Riverside Highland Water District General Manager Don
Hough, who indicated no opposition to the general plan amendment and zone change, but
that any future development on the Sites would need to be evaluated for water availability.32
Therefore, the Project, including the General Plan and Zoning text changes will not
adversely impact water availability or supplies.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required.
e. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that
it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Refer to response a through c above.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
f. Be served by a landfill with
sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid
waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and
local statutes and regulations related
to solid waste?
f and g: Solid waste collection services in the City are provided under a franchise
agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Solid waste collected in the City is taken to
the San Timoteo Landfill in the City of Redlands and the Colton Landfill in the City of Colton.
Since the Project will not entail any development or new uses, no impact to landfills or solid
waste regulations will occur.
Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required.
32 Letter from Riverside Highland Water Company General Manager Don Hough dated November 2, 2011.
Page 37 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 228
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have a potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant of animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
As contained in this analysis, no aspect of the Project has the potential to degrade the
environment, reduce habitat for fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant of animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of rare/endangered plants/animals, or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory.
Finding: No Impact.
b. Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
The proposed Project would change the General Plan Land Use designation and zoning of
a 2.52 acre of land from Medium Density Residential (6-12 du/ac) to Medium/High Density
Residential (20 du/ac), establish a new residential zone district that allows the 20 du/ac
density, broaden the intent of land uses of the MHDR land use designation, and amend the
Zoning Code in accordance with adopted Housing Programs and the PRD Ordinance.
Page 38 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 229
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
GPA 12-01, ZC 12-01 and ZCA 12-01
Page 39 of 42
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Based on the proposed density approximately 50 dwelling units with a total population of
141 persons (2.83 persons per household) could develop on the site.33 This would result in
a nominal net increase in density and population of 22 dwelling units and 61 persons,
respectively. The Project would generate a negligible increase in peak hour vehicle traffic
than the existing density would, and would not conflict with the 2007 AQMP, nor is it
expected to create the potential for adverse GHG emissions. As contained in this analysis,
no aspect of the Project will result in cumulatively considerable impacts.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact.
c. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Based on the analysis of the potential impacts contained in this Initial Study, no substantial
environmental effects have been identified which will cause adverse direct or indirect effects
upon human beings. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact.
Finding: Less Than Significant Impact.
33 General Plan, Land Use Element, April 27, 2011
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 230
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Environmental Initial Study
Implementation of Housing Element Programs
Source List
Application for Certification AES Highgrove Project, prepared by AES Highgrove and CH2M
HILL, May 2006
California Department of Toxic Substance Control, EnviroStor Database website
http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search.asp?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&s
ite_type=CSITES,ERAP,OPEN,FUDS,CLOSE&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&reporttitle=HAZA
RDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST.
California Division of Mines and Geology, Regional Geologic Hazards & MappingProgram –
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps website
http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/ap/ap_maps.htm.
California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
2008 County Maps website http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlrp/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx.
City of Grand Terrace 2010 General Plan, April 27, 2010.
City of Big Bear Lake, Crossings at Big Bear Lake Final Environmental Impact Report, July
2009
City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, 1984 and as amended.
City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR, General Plan Update and Amendment No. 6 to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Revised Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project,
April 27, 2010
City of Santa Clarita, Newhall Avenue Family Apartment, Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Initial Study, 2011
County of Riverside website http://www3.tlma.co.riverside.ca.us/pa/rclis/viewer.htm
Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Town Square Master Development Plan (SCH
#2008071017) prepared by LSA Associates, July 27, 2010
Letter from Joseph Ontiveros, Soboba Cultural Resource Department, Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians, October 18, 2010
State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker Database website:
http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=grand+terrace%2C+ca
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008.
Page 40 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 231
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 41 of 42
Attachment 1
Housing Element Programs and Planned Residential
Development Density Bonus Provisions
Program 8.8.1.c: The City’s Community and Economic Development Department
(CEDD)–Planning Division will implement a Zoning Code amendment to revise Chapter
18.10 to ensure the permitted uses table allows for manufactured housing in all residential
zones, in accordance with State law.
Program 8.8.1.d: As part of a comprehensive update of the City’s Zoning Code, the City’s
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD)–Planning Division will amend
its density bonus provisions in accordance with the requirements of State density bonus
law. The density bonuses and incentives will be made available for any for-sale or rental,
single-family or multi-family development when requested by a developer who agrees to
long-term affordability restrictions.
Additional incentives may include, but not be limited to, reduced site development
standards or zoning code requirements, direct financial assistance, reduced, or deferred
fees, approval of mixed-use zoning in conjunction with the housing development, or other
regulatory incentive which would result in an identifiable cost avoidance or reduction, or a
density bonus in accordance with the provisions of state law. Allocation of the specific
additional incentives will be made on a case-by-case- basis, depending on resources
available to the City from which to grant the incentive, and the particular needs of the
development to ensure affordability. However, prioritization of funding and incentives will be
given to those projects that include affordable housing for extremely low income
households.
Program 8.8.1.m: The City’s CEDD will amend the Zoning Code to permit emergency
shelters in the Industrial zone district without a conditional use permit, and subject to the
same development and management standards that apply to the residential or commercial
uses within the same zone district. Standards will also be established as provided for
under Senate Bill 2 to regulate emergency shelters.
Program 8.8.1.o: As part of a comprehensive update of the City’s Zoning Code, the City’s
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) will amend its Zoning Code to
eliminate requirements for a conditional use permit for detached second units, and to
amend the table of permitted uses contained in Chapter 18.10 (RH, R1, R2 and R-3 Zones)
to reflect administrative review of second units, in accordance with state law.
Program 8.8.1.p: As part of a comprehensive update of the City’s Zoning Code, the City’s
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) will amend its Zoning Code to
define transitional and supportive housing as residential uses subject only to those
Page 41 of 42
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 232
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
Page 42 of 42
Page 42 of 42
restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.
CEDD staff will amend the City’s Zoning Code to identify the zone districts in which single
room occupancy housing units will be permitted, in accordance with state law.
Program 8.8.1.q: As part of a comprehensive update of the City’s Zoning Code, the City’s
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) will amend its Zoning Code to
update the definition of multiple family residential in order to remove the bedroom
limitations, and to revisit the parking requirements for smaller units.
Program 8.8.1.r: As part of a comprehensive update of the City’s Zoning Code, the City’s
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) will amend Chapter 18.63 of
the Zoning Code to clarify the scope and authority of the Site and Architectural Review
Board.
Program 8.8.1.s: To accommodate the housing need for the remaining 27 units affordable
to lower-income households, the City will rezone at least 1.35 acres of vacant land, at a
minimum density of 20 units per acre. Rezoned sites will include Site A and Site D, as
described on Table 8.26, and allow exclusively multiple family and senior residential uses
and permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential uses by-right (without a
conditional use permit, planned unit development permit or other discretionary Program)
pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(h)
Program 8.8.3.l: The City shall amend its Zoning Code to establish a reasonable
accommodation process for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with
supportive services for persons with disabilities.
Planned Residential Development: Section 18.10.090.C2:
2. Density bonus: A density bonus, as shown below, may be considered by the
Planning Commission, based on the merits of the project, including that all
applicable development standards are met. Only one density bonus may be
granted.
a. Notwithstanding Subsection 2 above, a density bonus shall be granted for
affordable housing developments in accordance with the density bonus provisions of
Government Code Section 65915; or
b. A 20% density bonus with evidence that the project can be certified in LEED
for Homes; or
c. A 10% density bonus for construction of the project to meet or exceed more
than a 20% increase in energy efficiency above Title 24 requirements.
6.A.f
Packet Pg. 233
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
N
e
g
D
e
c
-
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 234
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 235
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 236
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 237
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 238
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 239
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 240
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 241
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
6.A.g
Packet Pg. 242
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
A
Q
M
D
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
M
e
m
o
(
1
0
3
9
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
1
2
-
0
1
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
1
2
-
0
1
)
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council Item
TITLE:Conceptual Design for Veteran's Memorial "Wall of
Freedom" at Pico Park
PRESENTED BY:Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development
Director
RECOMMENDATION:Approve the Conceptual Design for the Veteran's Memorial
at Pico Park as Presented by the Veteran's Memorial
Committee.
BACKGROUND:
On October 11, 2011, the Council reviewed a request from a group of Veterans to use a
2,200 square foot area at Pico Park to develop a Veteran's Memorial. The Council
agreed conceptually to support the memorial at this location, pending approval of the
design and an Agreement requiring liability insurance and on-going maintenance of the
memorial and its site. The site is at the southwest corner of Pico Park, adjacent to the
high school fencing and just west of the public facility building. The park's parking lot is
directly south of the site.
The project's sponsor is the Veteran's Memorial Committee of the Foundation of Grand
Terrace, and includes local Veterans, members of the Lion's Club, and members of the
American Legion.
DISCUSSION:
The Committee has prepared conceptual plans for an exciting and unique memorial,
which they will present to the Council on May 22, 2012. Their intent is to kick off their
fund-raising efforts for Memorial Day, May 28, 2012. The improvements include poured
concrete letters, six feet in height, spelling out "FREEDOM" to which memorial plaques
can be attached. The U.S. flag will be at the center at about 25 feet high. Six
removable service flags shown on the exhibit include the Army, Marines, Navy, Air
Force, Coast Guard, and the MIA-POW flags, from left to right. These six flags will be
flown for special events, and not on a daily basis. The Committee is requesting that a
light to illuminate the U.S. Flag be attached to the public facility building to keep it well
above ground level. Public Works staff has agreed that this is feasible and can be
completed by City staff.
Conceptual drawings of the improvements and an engineer's site exhibit are attached.
The Veteran's Committee will provide a presentation that will better depict the actual
Memorial.
The Committee plans to dedicate and begin flying the U.S. flag at the Memorial site on
Veteran's Day, November 11, 2012. Before that date, staff will prepare an Agreement
7.A
Packet Pg. 243
and present it to the Council for approval.
The project is categorically exempt from CEQA because it will not have a significant
impact on the environment. Staff will file a Notice of Exemption after receiving Council's
approval of the project concept.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Costs for parts to install the light to illuminate the U.S. flag can be charged to the
existing park maintenance budget. The Memorial Committee will maintain the site.
ATTACHMENTS:
·Veteran's Memorial Concept Drawing
·1104
·1105
APPROVALS:
Joyce Powers Completed 05/09/2012 4:35 PM
Finance Completed 05/09/2012 4:40 PM
City Attorney Completed 05/16/2012 8:53 AM
Community & Economic Development Skipped 05/16/2012 11:11 AM
City Manager Completed 05/16/2012 11:56 AM
City Council Pending
7.A
Packet Pg. 244
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 245
A
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 246
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
0
4
(
1
0
5
3
:
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
V
e
t
e
r
a
n
'
s
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
)
7.A.c
Packet Pg. 247
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
0
5
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council Item
TITLE:Emergency Operations Committee Appointment -La Matry
PRESENTED BY:Tracey Martinez, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION:Review Application Submitted by Carolyn LaMatry and
appoint her to fill an Unexpired Term on the Emergency
Operations Committee Continuing to June 30, 2014 or
Review the Application and Schedule an Interview to
determine Whether or not Council would like to Appoint Ms.
LaMatry as an Alternate Member of the Emergency
Operations Committee.
BACKGROUND:
The Emergency Operations Committee is an advisory group that was established by the
City Council. The meetings are held on the first Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in
the Emergency Operations Center located at 22795 Barton Road, Building #3. The
Committee is made up of seven voting members and four alternate members. The
expiration dates of the terms are staggered on even numbered years so that all of the
terms do not expire at the same time. Currently the Emergency Operations Committee
has two alternate member vacancies.
DISCUSSION:
The City has received an application from Carolyn LaMatry to serve as an alternate
member of the Emergency Operations Committee. As indicated above, the Committee
currently has two alternate member vacancies, one with a term expiring on June 30,
2012 and one expiring on June 30, 2014. Both vacancies were posted per Government
Code 54974. Attached is the application from Ms. LaMatry for your review. Please
review the application and appoint Ms. LaMatry to fill the unexpired term continuing to
June 30, 2014 or direct staff to schedule an interview to determine whether or not to
appoint her as an alternate member of the Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
·LaMatry Application
APPROVALS:
Tracey Martinez Completed 05/14/2012 1:57 PM
Finance Completed 05/14/2012 2:18 PM
8.A
Packet Pg. 248
City Attorney Completed 05/16/2012 8:52 AM
City Manager Completed 05/16/2012 11:50 AM
City Council Pending
8.A
Packet Pg. 249
CALIFORNIA
What do you consider to be your major qualifications?
F •
`((\VOlg--*Z— C rni of iretAA 4.for-eita • c,d3
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE. -thCEIVED
MAR 0 7 2012
Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department rY OF GRAND TERRACE
DEPARTM:7
Applying as a member of
Name
Address
Home Phone Business Phone
Occupation
)0(:,e 42e4/0 ciPze2177 Education (List highest year completed and all degrees)
Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (t4' fnlo If so, please list
Why are you interested in this appointment? '1 / s /7J1)e e
References
1.
2.
3.
Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the
City Council.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 250
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
L
a
M
a
t
r
y
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
1
0
4
9
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
A
p
p
o
i
n
t
m
e
n
t
-
L
a
M
a
t
r
y
)
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:May 22, 2012 Council Item
TITLE:California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Annual Board of
Directors Meeting -Designated Board of Directors
Certification
PRESENTED BY:Tracey Martinez, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION:Provide Direction to Staff on how to Proceed with the
Upcoming California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Board
of Directors Annual Meeting.
BACKGROUND:
The California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Board of Directors meet annually in
July. At the City Council Meeting of December 21, 2010, the Council appointed Mayor
Walt Stanckiewitz as the Representative to serve on the California Joint Powers
Insurance Authority Board of Directors and City Manager Betsy Adams to serve as the
Alternate.
DISCUSSION:
This year the Annual Meeting of the CJPIA is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, July
18, 2012. Staff has received notification that we need to certify the designated Director
and Alternate(s) prior to the annual meeting. As stated above, the Mayor and City
Manager have been appointed to serve as the Director and the Alternate to attend this
annual meeting.
With the establishment of the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Grand
Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency, a conflict has come up with the meeting of
the Oversight Board and the Annual CJPIA meeting. Since the Mayor is the Chairman
of the Oversight Board and the City Manager serves as the Executive Director to the
Successor Agency to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency and both
need to attend the Oversight Board Meeting on July 18, 2012, neither one of them will
be able to attend the CJPIA Meeting.
If the Council would like someone to represent the City of Grand Terrace at the annual
meeting, the Council will need to appoint an additional alternate and direct staff to certify
the designated Director and Alternate(s). The Director must be a member of the
governing board, which is Mayor Stanckiewitz, however, the Alternates may be an
elected official or staff member from the Agency. If the Council does not require
representation at the annual meeting then no further action needs to be taken.
Staff is requesting direction on how to proceed with the upcoming CJPIA Annual
Meeting.
8.B
Packet Pg. 251
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact with this item.
APPROVALS:
Tracey Martinez Completed 05/14/2012 4:52 PM
Finance Completed 05/16/2012 11:33 AM
City Attorney Completed 05/16/2012 3:55 PM
City Manager Completed 05/16/2012 5:59 PM
City Council Pending
8.B
Packet Pg. 252