02-15-2024CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
AGENDA ● FEBRUARY 15, 2024
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:30 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road
City of Grand Terrace Page 1
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
The public is encouraged to address the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board on any
matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the
Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board, please complete a Request to Speak Card and
hand it to the Planning Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair at the appropriate time and
each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time.
If you would like to participate telephonically and speak on an agenda item, you can access the meeting
by dialing the following telephone number and you will be placed in the waiting room, muted until it is your
turn to speak:
1-669-900-9128
Enter Meeting ID: 868 0508 4015
Password: 900043
The City wants you to know that you can also submit your comments by email to
ccpubliccomment@grandterrace-ca.gov. To give the Planning Secretary adequate time to print out your
comments for consideration at the meeting, please submit your written comments prior to 5:00 p.m.; or if
you are unable to email, please call the Planning Secretary’s office at (909) 954-5206 by 5:00 p.m.
If you wish to have your comments read to the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board
during the appropriate Public Comment period, please indicate in the Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT” and list the item number you wish to comment on. Comments that you want read to the
Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board will be subject to the three (3) minute time
limitation (approximately 350 words).
Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the
agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The Planning Commission/Site &
Architectural Review Board may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for
consideration at a future Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board meeting.
PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this
agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 1st Floor Lobby Area and 2nd Floor
Reception Area during regular business hours and on the City’s website www.grandterrace-ca.gov. For
further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the Planning Secretary at (909)
954-5206, or via e-mail at dalcocer@grandterrace-ca.gov.
Any documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board
regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at
City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be
posted on the City’s website at www.grandterrace-ca.gov.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (909) 954-5207 at least 48 hours prior to the advertised
starting time of the meeting. This will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible.
Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board February 15, 2024
City of Grand Terrace Page 2
CALL TO ORDER
Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board.
Pledge of Allegiance
AB 2449 Disclosures
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency
circumstances.
Roll Call
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
Chair Edward A. Giroux
Vice-Chair Tara Cesena
Commissioner David Alaniz
Commissioner Aron Burian
Commissioner Scot Mathis
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS
None.
PUBLIC ADDRESS
Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by
the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make a written
request to be agendized to the Director of Planning and Development Services.
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not
appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,
the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda but
may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The
Chairman may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public
comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting.
Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board February 15, 2024
City of Grand Terrace Page 3
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 09/07/2023
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
B. ACTION ITEMS
None.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Conditional Use Permit 22-02, Site and Architectural Review 22-08, Lot Merger 22-02,
and Environmental 22-06 Proposing an Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building and
Use Located at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(ENVIRONMENTAL 22-06) PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22 -02, SITE
AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 22-08 TO CONSTRUCT A 170,152 SQUARE-FOOT
ASSEMBLY AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON APPROXIMATELY 9.2 ACRES,
LOCATED AT 21801 AND 21823 BARTON ROAD (APNs: 1167-121-02; 1167-121-03;
1167-121-04; 1167-121-07; 1167-131-011; AND A PORTION OF 1167-121-08) IN THE
MR-RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
D. INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS
E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS
ADJOURN
Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review
Board/Planning Commission to be held on March 7, 2024, at 6:30 p.m.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES ● SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:30 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road
City of Grand Terrace Page 1
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Edward Giroux convened the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission/
Site and Architectural Review Board for Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 6:30 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice-Chair Tara Ceseña.
AB 2449 Disclosures
None.
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Edward A. Giroux Chair Present
Tara Cesena Vice-Chair Present
David Alaniz Commissioner Present
Aron Burian Commissioner Present
Scot Mathis Commissioner Present
Scott Hutter Planning & Development Services Director Present
Jamie Traxler Assistant City Attorney Present
Debra Thomas City Clerk Present
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1. Motion: APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2023 AGENDA
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scot Mathis, Commissioner
SECONDER: Aron Burian, Commissioner
AYES: Giroux, Cesena, Alaniz, Burian, Mathis
PRESENTATIONS
None.
A.1
Packet Pg. 4
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
S
e
p
7
,
2
0
2
3
6
:
3
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
C
A
L
E
N
D
A
R
)
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 7, 2023
City of Grand Terrace Page 2
PUBLIC ADDRESS
None.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 07/20/2023
RESULT: ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Tara Cesena, Vice-Chair
SECONDER: David Alaniz, Commissioner
AYES: Giroux, Cesena, Alaniz, Burian, Mathis
B. ACTION ITEMS
None.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
CANCELLED – Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 20-02 and
Environmental Review (E) 20-10.
1. Site and Architectural Review (SA) 22-19, Environmental 22-17. Proposing a Single-
Family Home, Located Behind 23196 Glendora Drive. APN: 0276-251-23, 24, and 25.
Scott Hutter, Planning Director gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation for
this item.
Chair Giroux opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m.
Herman Hilkey, Applicant made statements to the Planning Commission supporting his
project.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Frank Guzman, Grand Terrace opposes the project.
Herman Hilkey, Applicant wanted to assure his neighbor, Mr. Guzman that there would
be no impact on his property.
Chair Giroux closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
A.1
Packet Pg. 5
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
S
e
p
7
,
2
0
2
3
6
:
3
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
C
A
L
E
N
D
A
R
)
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 7, 2023
City of Grand Terrace Page 3
Planning Director Hutter requested that the motion to approve should reflect that the
action is to adopt the latest plans that were placed on the dais dated September 7,
2023, which include the proposed changes to the front setback which reduced the size
of the detached garage.
1) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, AND
2) ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 22-19 TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME 3,789-SQUARE FEET IN SIZE,
WITH VARIOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON A VACANT LOT BEHIND
23196 GLENDORA DRIVE (APNS: 0276-251-23, -24, -25), IN THE R1-20-VERY
LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT AND ADOPTING
ENVIRONMENTAL 22-17 AND FINDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION
FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT PURSUANT T O SECTION 15303 OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Edward A. Giroux, Chair
SECONDER: Aron Burian, Commissioner
AYES: Giroux, Cesena, Alaniz, Burian, Mathis
D. INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS
Konrad Bolowich, City Manager informed the Commission that moving forward, the
Planning Commission agenda packets will be delivered to the Commissioners’ homes.
E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS
Chair Giroux announced that he will not be available for the next scheduled Planning
Commission on October 5, 2023.
ADJOURN
Chair Giroux adjourned the regular meeting of the Planning Commission /Site and
Architectural Review Board for Thursday, September 7, 2023. The next scheduled
meeting of the Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board is to be held
on October 5, 2023, at 6:30 p.m.
A.1
Packet Pg. 6
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
S
e
p
7
,
2
0
2
3
6
:
3
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
C
A
L
E
N
D
A
R
)
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 7, 2023
City of Grand Terrace Page 4
_________________________________
Edward Giroux, Chairman
_________________________________
Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk
A.1
Packet Pg. 7
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
S
e
p
7
,
2
0
2
3
6
:
3
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
C
A
L
E
N
D
A
R
)
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 15, 2024
TITLE: Conditional Use Permit 22-02, Site and Architectural Review
22-08, Lot Merger 22-02, and Environmental 22-06
Proposing an Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building
and Use Located at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road.
PRESENTED BY: Scott Hutter, Planning & Development Services Director
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL 22-06) PURSUANT
TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA) AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
22-02, SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 22-08 TO
CONSTRUCT A 170,152 SQUARE-FOOT ASSEMBLY AND
MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON APPROXIMATELY 9.2
ACRES, LOCATED AT 21801 AND 21823 BARTON ROAD
(APNs: 1167-121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-
07; 1167-131-011; AND A PORTION OF 1167-121-08) IN
THE MR-RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING ZONING
DISTRICT
2030 VISION STATEMENT:
This item supports Goal 3 to Promote Economic Development by establishing an assembly and
light manufacturing building and use that is consistent with the MR-Restricted Manufacturing
Zoning District.
PROPOSAL:
The Applicant, HINES, one of the largest privately held real estate investors and managers in
the world, represented by Brad Lynds and Matt Ciccotti, filed an application for Conditional Use
Permit 22-02; Site and Architectural Review 22-08; and Environmental 22-06 which proposes
the development and operation of an approximate 173,000-square foot assembly and light
manufacturing building on a 9.2-acre site located at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road (APNs
1167-121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-07; 1167-131-011; and a portion of 1167-
121-08). Hines also filed an application for Lot Merger 22-02 which is concurrently being
processed ministerially through City Engineering and Planning pursuant to the Grant Terrace
Municipal Code.
C.1
Packet Pg. 8
The new building is comprised of 4,800 square-foot of office space, 50,326 square-foot of
assembly area, 115,026 square-foot of product storage area, 18 loading dock doors. Site
improvements include, but are not limited to, demolition and removal of existing concrete pads
and asphalt paved areas, construction of perimeter wall and fencing, landscaping, parking,
lighting, security features, and construction of ultimate street improvements at the Project’s
street frontage. Approximately 175 persons could be employed on site, working multiple shift
periods within the conditioned hours of operation. The interior operation hours are conditioned
to be 24/7, and deliveries to/from the site and loading/unloading operations would be
conditioned from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Hours of Operation
Permitted Prohibited
Inside building operations 24 hours/7 days per week ----
Outside building operations 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
The Project site is zoned MR-Restricted Manufacturing in the Zoning Map and designated Light
Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed assembly and light manufacturing
building and use is permitted in the MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning district and is
consistency with the City’s General Plan land use designation for the site. Pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal (Attached 5).
SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The Project site is located along Barton Road between Terrace Avenue and La Crosse Avenue
in the western portion of the City. The site is surrounded by existing commercial to the north,
existing residential uses to the northwest, a Southern California Edison overhead line to the
west, and existing commercial/industrial buildings to the south and east. A former railroad grade
for the Southern Pacific Railroad is adjacent west alongside the site. The site abuts the City of
Colton to the south and is in close proximity to Colton’s boundary to the west.
The Project site is currently vacant and includes a 12-feet-wide storm drain alignment to the
southwest, asphalt/paved parking areas, concrete slab, and sparse vegetation and trees. Soils
onsite consist of alluvium, comprised of clay, silt and gravel. The overall site topography is
generally flat and slopes downward to the south at a gradient of less than one percent, with the
exception of some local variation. Site elevation is approximately 970 feet above mean sea
level.
Surrounding land uses are as follows:
C.1
Packet Pg. 9
General Plan Land
Use Designation
Zoning Existing Land Use
North
Northwest
Industrial Medium Density
Residential
(MR) Restricted
Manufacturing (R-3)
Medium Density
Residential
Barton Road Business Park,
Class B Industrial
Residential
East General Commercial (C2) General
Commercial
Laboratory building for a
water testing company
South City of Colton-Light
Industrial
City of Colton-(M-1)
Light Industrial
City of Colton, La Crosse
Business Park
West Utility Easement City of
Colton-Light Industrial
City of Colton-(M-1)
Light Industrial
Disturbed vacant lot
The Project site has multiple easements traversing the property, some of which are proposed to
be quitclaimed. The Project is conditioned for the Applicant to obtain clearances from the
easement holders prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The encumbering easements
identified on the site plan include:
Lab
el
Type Easement
Holder
Recordi
ng Date
Recording
No.
Title Report & Exc.
No.
Method
of
Clearan
ce
A Electrical Southern
Sierras
Power
Company
4/22/191
2
Book 503
Page 292 of
Deed
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 3
Quitclai
m
B Electrical /
Communicat
ion
Southern
California
Edison
Company
4/4/1961 Book 5394
Page 506 of
Official
Records
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 6
Quitclai
m
C Sewers County
Services
Area 70,
Improvem
ent Zone,
H
4/2/1975 Book 8648
Page 441 of
Official
Records
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 9
Email
from
City of
Colton
approvin
g sewer
plan
(easeme
nt to
remain)
F Fiber Optic /
Communicat
ion
AT&T, as
successor
to Union
6/1/2007
and
9/2/2021
2021-
0401054
and 2007-
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 10 & 11
Email
from
AT&T
C.1
Packet Pg. 10
Pacific
Railroad
Company
0329371, of
Official
Records
approvin
g storm
drain
plan
(easeme
nt to
remain)
G Electrical /
Communicat
ion
Southern
Sierras
Power
Company
4/17/191
4
Book 547 of
Deeds,
Page 360
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 4
Quitclai
m
J Public
Highway
County of
San
Bernardin
o
5/25/192
0
Book 685,
Page 356,
of Deeds
01910638-919-EGL-
EGL, Exc. 5
Dedicati
on in fee
to the
City
Clearances for the following easements have been obtained:
Type Easement
Holder
Recording
Date
Recording
No.
Title Report & Exc.
No.
Method of
Clearance
Drainage Ruben T Luna
and Christine
I. Luna
3/2/1987 Instrument
No. 87-
67708 of
Official
Records
21000111672, Exc.
10
Quitclaim
Road Ruben T Luna
and Christine
I. Luna
3/2/1987 Instrument
No. 87-
67709 of
Official
Records
21000111672, Exc.
11
Quitclaim
Water
Canal
Riverside
Water
Company
2/4/1886 Book 150 of
Deeds, Page
347
21000111672, Exc.
13 NCS-1105951-
ONT1, EXC. 9
License
Agreement
ANALYSIS:
General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning Consistency
The site is designated Light Industrial (LI) on the General Plan Land Use Map. Permitted uses
may include light manufacturing and assembly, small scale warehousing and distribution,
research and development, and administrative and service types of uses.
The site is designated Restricted Manufacturing District (MR) on the Zoning Map. The purpose
C.1
Packet Pg. 11
of the MR District is to provide for the development of low intensity and low impact light
manufacturing and industrial uses. Manufacturing and industrial uses that operate free of
objectionable noise, dust, odor, or other nuisances to other (non-industrial uses) in planned,
architecturally integrated building groups would be allowable uses. Permitted uses in the MR
district include, but are not limited to, agricultural and nursery supplies and services; automotive
related services (including motorcycles, boats, recreational vehicles, trailers, and campers);
parts and supplies; building maintenance services and supplies sales; communication services;
laundry/cleaning services; light manufacturing; printing/reproduction services; public storage
facilities; and research services.
The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan land use designation and zoning
designation. The Project meets the zoning development standards. The Municipal Code allows
one hundred percent lot coverage minus the required parking and landscaping. The Project
meets the parking requirement of 240 spaces, meets the height requirement of minimum 35
feet, meets the twenty-five front setback requirements, exceeds the 5% minimum landscape
requirement, and complies with the outside loading dock storage and roof mechanical
equipment screening requirements.
Operation and Objectives
The proposed building is a speculative building, and no specific tenant has been identified at
this time by the Applicant. The typical anticipated operational activities would include employees
and customers traveling to and from the site, delivery of materials and supplies to the site, truck
loading and unloading, and light manufacturing activities. Racks, forklifts, shelving units,
automatic machines, and conveyor belts are anticipated to be utilized within the interior of the
building. Approximately 175 persons are anticipated to be employed on site, with one or more
shift periods occurring each day.
Municipal Code Section 8.108.050 (Item F), “Loading or Unloading of Trucks” stipulates that “no
person shall create or cause to be created loud and excessive noise in connection with the
loading or unloading of motor trucks and other vehicles, so as to disturb the peace and quiet of
adjacent residential neighborhoods, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The loading
or unloading in such a manner as to be loud or excessive at a distance of 50 feet from the
trucks or vehicles being unloaded shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this Section.”
The Applicant has requested that those hours for the loading or unloading be lengthened by 2
hours. It is the discretion of the Planning Commission to consider these extended hours for the
loading and unloading activities in the loading dock area. The conditions of approval as
presented with this agenda item reflect the Applicant’s request for extended dock hours but can
be modified upon direction from the Planning Commission.
The Applicant is requesting 24/7 hours of operation inside the building pursuant to Municipal
Code Section 18.06.032 “After-hours operation,” any use that has hours of operation at any time
between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. is considered to have “after-hours operation. The Applicant’s
request for 24/7 hours of operation means that during “after-hours operation,” deliveries to the
site and loading/unloading of materials are not permitted.
C.1
Packet Pg. 12
The Applicant is requesting loading dock open at 6:00 a.m. and close at 11:00 p.m. All delivery,
loading, and unloading activities would occur between those hours. All 18 loading docks for the
Project are located on the southwest side of the building behind the security gate and fencing.
This location was preferable as it is located the maximum distance away from sensitive
receptors (residential uses), allowing the building and fencing to screen operations and noise
from nearby sensitive receptors to the northwest. The Project is located more than 50 feet from
sensitive land uses (existing residential neighborhood) buffered by the Barton Road public right -
of-way.
The Project will have 24/7 on-site security cameras and is conditioned for any future tenant to
submit a security plan and operations plan to the San Bernardino County Sheriff and the
Planning Director prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Site Plan
The site design conforms to setback, height limits, and lot coverage requirements of the MR-
Restricted Manufacturing zone. The Project scope includes demolition and removal of existing
concrete pads and asphalt paved areas, construction of perimeter wall and fencing,
landscaping, parking, trash enclosure, lighting, security features, and construction of ultimate
street improvements at the Project’s frontage (Attachment 2).
The Project’s parking will include a combination of five-feet perimeter landscaping planter and
diamond tree/landscape every two parking spaces, totaling 6.8 percent landscape coverage.
The Project’s perimeter fencing to the east property line will include 6-foot-high wrought iron
fence with green vines and decorative pilasters every 20 feet, the south side will have 8-feet
high tubular fencing, and the west side will be a retaining wall with tubular fence on top with
varying height not to exceed 6-feet. The loading docks and trailer area are located on the
southwest of the property secured by 8-foot high manually operated metal gates. The storm
drain and storm tech underground chambers for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) are located in the southwest area. Parking lot lighting will not exceed 1.4 -foot
candles at the property lines. In accordance with the Zoning Code, the Applicant is required to
complete all right-of-way improvements including, but not limited, driveway approach,
dedication, and restoration of any public improvements damaged during construction. In
addition, the Project has been conditioned to complete the ultimate street frontage
improvements once the City of Colton bridge street improvements are completed, in
coordination with the City of Grand Terrace and City of Colon (Attachment 3).
Access and Circulation
The Project’s main 70 feet wide driveway for vehicular ingress and egress access will be off
Barton Road at the Project’s northern boundary. The Project includes thirty (30) feet wide
interior access around the perimeter of the building. An emergency vehicle access driveway will
be located along the northern boundary, east of the main driveway, and secured with a
commercial anti-crash gate. The proposed 170,152 square-foot building is required by the
Municipal Code to provide a total of 240 parking spaces. The parking will include 7 accessible
parking stalls and 48 EV capable (20 percent), with 12 stalls being full charging stations and 36
C.1
Packet Pg. 13
equipped with EV supply equipment for future use. Eighteen (18) trailer parking spaces will be
provided, located in front of the corresponding loading dock door. This area is enclosed by a
gated entrance on the west side and another on the south side, at the back of the building.
Pedestrian access is located on the northeast side of the property and leads directly to the office
area. Access and circulation improvements will be designed and constructed consistent with
City design and engineering standards.
The Project is proposing the ultimate street improvements at Barton Road, including dedication,
underground utilities, streetscape, and compliance to conditions of approval established by the
City Engineer with the Public Works Division.
Landscape Plan
The Project proposes approximately 26,645 square feet (6.6 percent of the site’s area) of
landscaping, exceeding the 5 percent landscape requirement. The parking lot areas located on
the northeast and northwest portions of the site would include 15-gallon to 24-inch box trees
and 5-gallon shrubs. The proposed landscape will be visually pleasing within the Industrial
zoning and will create screening between existing uses.
Landscaping for the Project will be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code Title 15, Buildings and Construction, Section 15.56, Water Efficient
Landscape, and has been conditioned accordingly. A final landscape and irrigation plan in
accordance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance will be required and landscape
improvements will be completed prior to final building inspection. (Attachment 4)
Architectural Elevations/Floor Plans
The building will be concrete tilt-up panels’ construction with wall articulation in the form of
projections, glass, metal accents, and variations in color. The floor plan is divided in three areas,
including 4,800 square-foot of office space, 50,326 square-foot of assembly area, 115,026
square-foot of product storage area, and 18 loading docks and doors. The building height is 44-
feet, and the rooftop HVAC equipment units will be screened from the street line of sight by the
parapet height within the architecture of the building. The main façade elevation is oriented to
the north, fronting Barton Road. The office entrance is located to the northeast side of the
building highlighted by floor to ceiling gazed windows with a metal canopy (Attachment 2).
The Applicant is proposing to a neutral-tone gray color scheme, “Snowbound” for the base color
with accent areas in “March Wind”, “Gray Shingle”, “Gauntlet Gray”, “Iron Ore”, accent tile in
“Porta Nouva Rovere”, and metal canopy at the east building entrance (Attachment 5). The
proposed architecture, colors, and materials will be harmonious with the surrounding
commercial and industrial uses.
AGENCY REVIEW:
The Project’s architectural plans were distributed to various departments for review and
comment prior to this agenda report. Conditions of approval received from reviews by Building
C.1
Packet Pg. 14
and Safety, Public Works, San Bernardino County Fire (Permit No: FPLN-2022-00215), Burrtec,
and the City of Colton are included in the Project’s Conditions (Attachment 7).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Pursuant to CEQA, an Initial Study was prepared to analyze potential significant environmental
impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed Project.
As required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the Initial Study determined a Mitigated
Negative Declaration was required for the Project.
Based on the Initial Study and supporting information, the City intends to adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded the Project
would have “no impact” or “less than a significant impact” in the areas of aesthetics, agriculture
and forestry, air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, lands
use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation,
wildfire, and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded the Project would have potential
environmental impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards
and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. Adherence to the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program would reduce the potential environmental impacts
to a less than significant level.
The Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft was circulated for a 30-day public
review period from October 26, 2023, to December 5, 2023 [extended due to the November 23
holiday].
The Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was made available for public review at
City Hall and on the City’s website: <https://www.grandterrace-
ca.gov/departments/planning_development_services>.
The Notice of Intent to Adopt was noticed to properties within 1000-foot radius; posted in the
local newspaper “Grand Terrace City News”; and filed with the San Bernardino County Clerk
and the State Clearinghouse.
The City received 11 written comment letters in response to the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
The Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration provides responses to comments and
includes the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program.
The Final IS/MND was posted on the City’s website. The City noticed this public hearing to
properties within 1000-foot radius and to commentors requesting to be added to the distribution
list during the public review period.
A Notice of Determination will be filed with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse upon
Project approval.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
C.1
Packet Pg. 15
The Public Hearing Notice for the Project was published in compliance with the City's Municipal
Code and the City’s “Expanded Public Noticing and Outreach Policy for Public Hearings and
Public Workshops.”
The Public Hearing Notice was published at the Grand Terrace City News (1/4-page box
advertisement), posted in three public places, including Grand Terrace News Paper, City Hall
Lobby and Kiosk, and at the Project site located at 21801/21823 Barton Road. The Public
Hearing Notice was mailed to property owners within 1000-feet of the site.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed assembly and light manufacturing building is consistent with the City’s General
Plan land use designation and zoning district for the site. The construction of the building,
including colors, materials, and proposed landscaping will complement and enhance both the
site and surrounding area. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution 2024-01; approve the Project and the Conditions of Approval; and approve the Final
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
FINDINGS
Environmental:
1. Finding: The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board hereby finds that
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study has been prepared for the Project
by the City as the Lead Agency.
Facts in Support of Finding: Based on the Initial Study and supporting analysis, a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Project will not have a significant effect on the
environment due to the incorporation of conditions and mitigation measures to reduce or offset
impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous
materials, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources to less than significant levels. The
Project is consistent with the applicable general plan land use designation and zoning map
development standards. The approval of the Project would not result in environmental significant
effects to aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions,
hydrology and water quality, lands use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing,
public services, recreation, wildfire, and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services. Further, potential environmental impacts to biological resources, cultural
resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, tribal
cultural resources require mitigation to offset or reduce impacts. Adherence to the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program would reduce all impacts to a less than significant level. The
Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Conditional Use Permit:
A.-1 Finding: The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort,
or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the
proposed Project or within the city.
C.1
Packet Pg. 16
Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use
(“Project”) is consistent with the Industrial General Plan Land Use Designation and is
consistent with the MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning which supports low intensity
and low impact light manufacturing and industrial uses. Land uses surrounding the
Project site consist mainly of commercial and industrial uses, with multifamily residential
located northeast of the Projects site.
The Project is a shell built to suit an assembly and light manufacturing building, the
anticipated Project operational activities for the future tenant will include employees and
customers traveling to and from the site, delivery of materials and supplies to the site,
truck loading and unloading, and light manufacturing activities. Equipment such as
forklifts, shelving units, automatic machines, conveyor belts will be utilized in the interior
of the facility. There is no outdoor storage proposed and the Project has been
conditioned to keep all storage material and equipment in the interior of the building.
The proposed hours of operation for deliveries will be from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Loading/unloading of material and deliveries will be prohibited between 11:00 p.m. and
6:00 a.m.; however, the interior operations will be conducted twenty-four hours/seven
days per week (24/7). The 173,000-square foot assembly and light manufacturing
building is proposed to be constructed approximately in the center of the 9.2-acre
property and has an approximate height of 44-feet. The Project has been designed with
loading docks located on the southwest side of the building, allowing the building and
walls to screen operations and noise from nearby sensitive receptors, located to the
northwest. In addition, the Project is located more than 50 feet from existing residential
uses.
The Project meets the parking requirement of 240 parking spaces with 18 tuck dock
doors. Approximately 175 people would be employed on site, with two shifts per day.
There are no anticipated parking issues. In addition, the Project has been conditioned to
have a maximum truck storage consistent with the number of loading dock doors totaling
18. The Project has been conditioned so no construction or modifications that increase
the number of loading docks will be supported. In addition, the Project has been
conditioned to undergo a Project review in the same manner as the original conditional
use permit should the site be subleased to more than one tenant business. The parking
will include lighting proposed to be shielded from reflecting in the public right-of-way and
adjacent properties. The Project will have on-site cameras that will be operated 24/7.
Due to the unidentified tenant, a Conditional Use Permit was required so the Planning
Commission may periodically review this approval to ensure that is being operated in a
manner consistent with the conditions of approval and in a manner which is not
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties in
the vicinity pursuant to Section 18.83.032.
Based on the items above stated, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed Project or within the city.
A.-2 Finding: The proposed use will not be injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or within the city.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Conditional Use Permit allows the City to impose
C.1
Packet Pg. 17
conditions of approval to prevent impacts to the adjacent properties caused by
operations activities. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration includes mitigation
measures to prevent and/or minimize impacts related to biological resources, cultural
resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation,
and tribal cultural resources. The Project has been conditioned to provide a security plan
and operations plan to be reviewed and approved by San Bernardino County Sheriff’s
and the Planning Director. The proposed use is consistent with the zoning designation
and meets the design standards. The Project frontage along Barton Road will include
ultimate street improvements, including but not limited to sidewalk, curb, gutter, and
street landscape. A bond will be established to allow for Colton’s Bridge Improvements.
The Project will be conditioned for maintenance of all landscaping areas, including
maintenance of the city’s right-of-way landscape frontage. In addition, conditions will be
included for compliance with the city’s Noise standards, the lighting must remain on
during the hours of operation, installation of security cameras, on-site maintenance, and
overall upkeep to the building exterior. The proposed Project will not be injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or City. The City has the authority to
revoke a conditional use permit to ensure the community’s health, safety, and welfare
are protected, pursuant to Chapter 18.83-Conditional Use Permit.
B. Finding: The use is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan.
Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use is
consistent with the Light Industrial General Plan land use designation which permitted
uses typically include light manufacturing and assembly, small scale warehousing and
distribution, research and development, and administrative and service type of uses. The
use is also consistent with the MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning designation which
supports low intensity and low impact light manufacturing and industrial uses which
operate free of objectionable noise, dust, odor, or other nuisance to other (non-industrial
uses) in planned, architectural integrated buildings; therefore, the proposal is consistent
General Plan and zoning, and compatible with adjacent uses.
C. Finding: Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of this Chapter are made a part
of the conditional use permit.
Facts in Support of Finding: Conditions of approval for compliance with operations
consistent with the Findings above stated, consistent with City review, and Mitigation
Monitoring Reporting Program have been included. Pursuant to the Municipal Code
Section 18.83.080 the Conditional Use Permit may be revoked if any Conditions of
Approval are violated, and if any Federal, State, or local law or ordinance is violated in
connection with a conditional permitted use.
Site and Architectural Review:
1. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code and General Plan.
Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use is
C.1
Packet Pg. 18
consistent with the intent of the Light Industrial General Plan designation intended for
uses that can be made compatible with other surrounding uses within the City regarding
noise, dust, odors, vibration, glare, air, quality, traffic, aesthetics, and hazardous
materials. Supported uses typically include light manufacturing and assembly, small
scale warehousing and distribution, research and development, and administrative and
service type of uses. MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning, which supports the
development of low intensity and low impact light manufacturing and industrial uses. The
Project requires the Lot Merger consistent with Goal 2.4. to provide for a mix of attractive
industrial land uses designated to generate employment opportunities and Policy 2.4.5,
to assist in the consolidation and assemblage of properties to assure adequate size
quality development in areas designated as light industrial.
In addition, the proposed manufacturing and light assembly use is consistent with the
Restricted Manufacturing District in the Municipal Code which purpose is to provide for
the development of low intensity and low impact light manufacturing and industrial uses.
The use is permissible in the zoning; however, a Conditional Use Permit was required to
ensure the use remains operating consistent with the approval. An Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been conducted for the Project. The Project meets the
purpose of the zoning, and it meets the applicable development standards, including but
not limited to lot coverage, parking, setbacks, and landscaping requirements.
2. Finding: The location and configuration of all structures associated with this Project are
visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, as they do not
interfere with the neighbor’s privacy and do not unnecessarily block scenic views from
other structures and/or public areas and are in scale with the townscape and natural
landscape of the area.
Facts in Support of Finding: The 170,152 square foot building will be located in the
central area of the Project site. The east perimeter will include a six-foot high fence with
artificial vines or similar material and decorative pilasters every 15-feet with a five-foot
landscape screen landscape area. The south side will include an eight-foot tubular streel
fence, the west will have a combination retaining wall with tubular steel fence, the north
side of the Project will be landscaped. The trailer storage and loading area is enclosed
behind a concrete wall and solid steel fence in the west and south. The Project
improvements include but are not limited to parking, lighting, landscape, perimeter
fencing/wall and full street improvements. These improvements are visually harmonious
to the site and surrounding area and will not block scenic views from other structures and
are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area.
3. Finding: The architectural design of structures, their materials and colors are visually
harmonious with surrounding development, natural landforms, are functional for the
proposed Project and are consistent with this code.
C.1
Packet Pg. 19
Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed building architecture will be compatible with
the adjacent developments. The proposed building is a tilt-up construction with a
maximum building height of two stories proposed at 44-feet in accordance with the
development standards of the Municipal Code Chapter 18.39. The building will be
concrete tilt-up panel construction with wall Projections, and five colors and material
articulations. The northeast corner of the building where the main entrance and the 2,400
square foot office is located will have glazing tempered glass from floor to ceiling. The
building colors include a cool palette in grays and white, and four architectural accents
including wood tile, mullions, grazing, and canopy. The building is consistent and visually
harmonious with the existing commercial/industrial surrounded uses.
4. Finding: The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually
pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the natural
landscape of the area and nearby developments.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Project proposes approximately 26,645 square feet
(6.6 percent of the site’s area) of landscaping on-site, which exceeds the 5% minimum
landscape requirement. The parking lot areas located on the northeast and northwest
portions of the site would include 15- to 24-inch box trees and 5-inch gallon shrubs. A
concrete screen retaining wall would be constructed that measures 6 feet tall and 8 feet
high and would connect along the west side of the property line. The east side of the site
would be bordered by a 6-foot-tall fence with green vines and decorative pilasters. The
south side will be bordered by an 8-foot-tall tubular steel fence. The front landscape
includes the required 10-feet landscaped setback area. The landscape and irrigation
plans will be in accordance with the requirements of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code
Title 15, Buildings and Construction, Section 15.56, Water Efficient Landscape. The
Project’s landscape will visually enhance the site and be compatible with the surrounding
development.
5. Finding: There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural
vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus the natural beauty of
the city, its setting and natural landforms are preserved.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site includes approximately 660 linear feet
(0.18-acre) of a storm drain alignment to the southwest, asphalt/paved parking areas,
concrete slab, and sparse vegetation with approximately twenty trees, mainly along the
perimeter. Soils onsite consist of alluvium, comprised of clay, silt and gravel. The overall
site topography slopes downward to the south at a gradient of less than one percent,
with the exception of some local variation. The elevation at the Project site is
approximately 970 feet above mean sea level.
6. Finding: The design and location of all signs associated with this project are consistent
with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or otherwise
C.1
Packet Pg. 20
associated with and are consistent with this code.
Facts in Support of Finding: No sign or monument proposals have been reviewed as
part of this approval. The following condition has been included: Condition of Approval
No. 85, “Signs are not approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new
signs, the Applicant shall submit an application, and receive approval, for a sign permit
from the Planning Division (pursuant to Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code) and a building permit for construction of the signs from the Building Division, as
applicable. The design and location of future signs shall be consistent with the scale and
character of the building.”
7. Finding: Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of this
code and general plan are made a part of this approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: Conditions of approval for compliance with the Findings
above stated and consistent with City review, and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting
Program have been incorporated; including but not limited to prohibiting outside building
operations from the hours of 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., prohibiting outdoor storage of non -
material handling equipment, restricting outdoor storage of material handling equipment
such as forklifts and yard goats to the 18 loading dock parking spaces, restricting on-site
trucks to the number of loading docks approved, and prohibiting construction or
modifications to the building that increase the number of loading dock areas. The project
was conditioned to obtained easements clearances and obtain a recorded Lot Merger
prior to the issuance of a building permit. A condition was also included requiring the
Applicant to implement the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program and
Mitigation Measures listed. The City will contract with a specialized consultant to certify
the MMRP and the Applicant will bear the cost of the consultation services.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final IS.MND_Hines Assembly Bldg Project_February 2024 (PDF)
• Conditions of Approval_Hines Assembly Bldg Project (PDF)
• Resolution 2024-01_Hines Assembly Bldg Project (PDF)
• Project Plans (PDF)
APPROVALS:
Scott Hutter Completed 02/07/2024 2:42 PM
City Manager Pending 02/07/2024 2:35 PM
Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review Board Pending 02/15/2024 6:30
PM
C.1
Packet Pg. 21
Final Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
February 2024
Lead Agency
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
Contact: Scott Hutter, Development Services Director
SHutter@grandterrace-ca.gov
Applicant
Hines
12101 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 200
Los Angeles, California 90064
Contact: Matt Ciccotti, Director Development
Matt.Ciccotti@hines.com
Environmental Consultant
Michael Baker International
3536 Concours, Suite 100
Ontario, California 91764
Contact: Elizabeth Meyerhoff, Project Manager
Elizabeth.Meyerhoff@mbakerintl.com
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 ERRATA ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-1
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ...................................................................... 4-1
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (herein referenced as the “project”) proposes the development
and operation of an assembly and light manufacturing building. The project site is approximately 9.2 acres and is
located in the western portion of the City of Grand Terrace (herein referenced as the “City”) at Assessor’s Parcel
Numbers (APNs) 1167-121-02, 1167-121-03, 1167-121-04, 1167-121-07, a portion of 1167-121-08; and 1167-131-
011. Specifically, the project site is located at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road on the south side of Barton Road, between
Terrace Avenue and La Crosse Avenue. Regional access to the project site is provided via I-215 and local access is
provided via Barton Road, both of which are identified as major corridors in the City’s General Plan Environmental
Impact Report (EIR). The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. According to the
General Plan Land Use Element, "permitted uses for properties designated as Light Industrial include those uses that
can be made compatible with other surrounding uses within the City regarding noise, dust, odors, vibration, glare, air
quality, traffic, aesthetics, and hazardous materials. Typical uses may include light manufacturing and assembly, small
scale warehousing and distribution, research and development, and administrative and service types of uses.” The
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
The proposed project is the development of an assembly and light manufacturing building up to a maximum of 173,000
square feet. The maximum building height of the two-story building is proposed at approximately 44 feet in accordance
with the development standards contained in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 18.39, MR Restricted Manufacturing
District. Site improvements include new parking, landscaping, trash enclosure area, lighting, security, 18 dock doors,
perimeter wall and fencing, and street improvements along the north side of the site.
The City of Grand Terrace has discretionary authority over the proposed project, which requires the following
discretionary approvals:
• Conditional Use Permit (CUP 22-02)
• Lot Merger (LM 22-02)
• Site and Architectural Review (SA 22-08)
• Environmental (E 22-06) CEQA Compliance
The Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023100788) was made
available for public review and comment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073. The public review commenced
on October 26, 2023 and concluded on December 5, 2023.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
During the 30-day public review period, a total of 10 written comment letters were received. The following is a list of
commenters on the Draft IS/MND during the public review period.
Comment
Letter Commentor Email / Letter Dated
A. Southern California Gas Company
Will Liao November 1, 2023
B. Lambert Family Trust
Terry Lambert November 2, 2023
C. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Sahar Ghadimi November 14, 2023
D. City of Riverside
Daniel Palafox November 22, 2023
E. Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Gary Ho November 30, 2023
F. Adam Salcido December 1, 2023
G. Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Angelica Zhou (supplemental letter) December 5, 2023
H. Lozeau Drury LLP
Marjan R. Abubo December 5, 2023
I. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Sahar Ghadimi (supplemental letter) December 5, 2023
J. City of Colton
Mark Tomich December 4, 2023
K. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
Joe Bourgeois January 23, 2024
Although the CEQA Guidelines do not require a lead agency to prepare written responses to comments received (State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15088), the City of Grand Terrace has elected to prepare the following written responses
with the intent of conducting a comprehensive and transparent evaluation of the proposed project.
Each comment letter is assigned an alphabetical reference (A, B, C, etc), and each comment within the letter identified
numerically. The City’s response is correlated to the bracketed and identified portions of each comment letter. Where
relevant, new or revised text is provided in double underlined and text for marked for deletion is provided in strike-
through and is also provided in the Errata (Final IS/MND, Section 3).
One master response is provided related to the project’s existing conditions/baseline setting. Remaining comments are
addressed individually.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Master Response #1 - Existing Conditions/Baseline Setting
The Draft IS/MND, Section 2.2 Project Description, identifies the environmental setting/physical environmental
conditions consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(1)(a), which states:
(1) Generally, the lead agency should describe physical environmental conditions as they exist at
the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time
environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective. Where existing
conditions change or fluctuate over time, and where necessary to provide the most accurate picture
practically possible of the project's impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by
referencing historic conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or
both, that are supported with substantial evidence. In addition, a lead agency may also use baselines
consisting of both existing conditions and projected future conditions that are supported by reliable
projections based on substantial evidence in the record.
At the time of initiating the project’s environmental review process (March 2023), the environmental baseline the site
was developed with three (3) industrial buildings consisting of the following businesses: Nu-Ray Metals (manufacturer
and installer of metal siding and roofing materials), Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. (sewer mainline cleaning and video
inspection company), and a former administrative building. As such, these buildings were reflected in the environmental
analysis and described in the project description (Refer to Draft IS/MND Section 2.2, Environmental Setting). These
three industrial buildings were approximately 12,950 square feet in size and located along the northeastern portion of
the project site. By August 2023, these buildings have since been demolished for public health and safety reasons as
deemed necessary by the City 1. However, the demolition of these buildings has been studied as part of the project’s
environmental analysis. These baseline conditions were established at the beginning of the environmental review
process in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(1)(a).
The description of the environmental setting is intended to provide context for the reader to understand the impacts
discussed, and for the significance conclusions that are provided within the CEQA compliance document (CEQA Portal
Topic Paper, Baseline and Environmental Setting,
https://ceqaportal.org/tp/Baseline%20and%20Environmental%20Setting%20Topic%20Paper%2008-23-16.pdf).
1 City Demolition Permits B00-004-879, B00-004-880, B00-004-881.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Liao, William <WLiao@socalgas.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 1:50 PM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request <SCGSERegionRedlandsUtilityRequest@semprautilities.com>
Subject: RE: Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Hey Scott.
Regarding the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project at 21801 Barton Road, I have no
concerns at this time. There are some services to the two buildings there in the NE corner of the project
area, but I believe they may already have been abandoned. IF not, they should be taken care of soon
due to the Barton Bridge project.
Please help me ensure safety by reminding builder to contact 811 / USA prior to any excavation activities
so we can get out to locate and mark. If the builder needs gas service in their new facility, please have
them reach out to our Builder Services group to begin the application process as soon as practicable, at:
Builder Services | SoCalGas
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Will Liao
Region Planning Supervisor
Redlands HQ / Southeast Region
Desk: 213-244-4543
Mobile: 840-213-5899
A-1
Comment Letter A C.1.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the
recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a
leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security
awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and
small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward
building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter A – Southern California Gas Company
Response A-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the Southern California Gas Company’s participation in the public review
process. This commentor notes that they do not have any concerns regarding the project at the time of writing and
notes the presence of two buildings on the NE corner of the project area. This commenter also asks the builder to
contact Southern California Gas Company prior to excavation activities, and/or if the builder needs gas service. The
comment is acknowledged. Since this comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Draft
IS/MND or raise an issue or comment specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis under CEQA,
no further response is warranted (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and
respond to comments raised on environmental issues). A copy of this comment letter has been provided to the
applicant.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: terry lambert <terrysally@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 10:04 AM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Subject: Hines Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
To: Scott Hutter
I received a letter about this project and
I have looked at a lot of things in this project, but I can't find what it is that they will
actually be manufacturing....
I would like to know exactly what they will be manufacturing ?
Can you please let me know what it is that they will be making?
Thanks
Terry Lambert
Lambert Family trust
lot 44 on map of project...
12190 La Crosse Ave.
951-218-0808
terrysally@sbcglobal.net
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the
recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly p rohibited
and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a
leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security
awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and
small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward
building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.
B-1
Comment Letter B
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter B – Lambert Family Trust
Response B-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the Lambert’s Family Trust participation in the public review process. The
commenter asks what the project will be manufacturing. The comment is acknowledged. While the project
applicant/developer, Hines, does not have a specific tenant at this time; the following statement has been provided by
Hines: “We are confident the building’s location and high-quality specifications will attract a Class A tenant that will
bring jobs and economic activity to this section of the City of Grand Terrace. The project will be built to Class A
standards for 21st century assembly and manufacturing tenants. Companies that have moved into similar facilities in
the area are focused on the design, manufacturing and assembly of the following types of products:
- Innovative medical devices in orthopedic surgery and neurotechnology
- Electric vehicles
- Fitness equipment
- Furniture and home décor
- Men’s and women’s clothing
- Paper-based consumer products
- Vitamins, supplements and other nutritional products
- Consumer electronics and batteries
- Filing equipment, assembly lines and packaging solutions”
Additionally, the City has prepared several Conditions of Approval related to the tenant, business license, and approved
use of the building, including:
Condition of Approval #3: Minor modifications to this approval which are determined by the Planning and Development
Services Director to be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, and which do not intensify or change
the use or require any deviations from adopted standards, may be approved by the Planning and Development Services
Director upon submittal of the required application(s) and the required fee(s) consistent with the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code
Condition of Approval #12: A building permit shall be obtained for any proposed tenant improvement construction,
remodel, renovation, or expansion.
Condition of Approval #13: Revisions or modifications requested by the Applicant, including but not limited to,
substantial changes to these conditions, expansions, land use intensity, or hours of operation, shall be processed in
the same manner as the original approval consistent with Municipal Code Chapter 18.83 and Chapter 18.63.mittal of
the required application(s) and the required fee(s) consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
Condition of Approval #21: Any future development on the site, including alterations, conversions, remodels, and new
structures shall require compliance with the Municipal Code.
Condition of Approval #22: Any future changes in on-site activities shall require submittal, review, and approval of a
modified conditional use permit.
Condition of Approval #88: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the future tenant shall comply with
Local, State, and Federal requirements, and obtain a City’s Business License from the Finance Department prior to
initiating business operations. The business license shall be renewed annually, at the beginning of each calendar year,
during the month of January, for as long as the business in operation.
These Conditions of Approval require a tenant to be compliant with the requirements within this application, and as
analyzed in this IS/MND.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Since this comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND or raise an issue or
comment specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis under CEQA, no further response is required
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and respond to comments raised on
environmental issues).
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Sahar Ghadimi <sghadimi@aqmd.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 11:40 AM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Sam Wang <swang1@aqmd.gov>
Subject: Technical Data request for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project.
Dear Scott Hutter,
South Coast AQMD staff received the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (South Coast AQMD Control Number:
SBC231101-10). Staff is currently in the process of reviewing the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
Please provide an electronic copy of any live modeling and emission calculation files (complete files, not
summaries) that were used to quantify the air quality impacts from construction and/or operation of the
Proposed Project as applicable, including the following:
•CalEEMod,
Input Files (.csv files);
•Live EMFAC output files;
•Any emission calculation file(s) (live version of excel file(s); no PDF) used to calculate the
Project’s emission sources
(i.e. truck operations).
You may send the above-mentioned files via a Dropbox link in which they may be accessed and
downloaded by South Coast AQMD staff by the end of the week. Without all files and supporting
documentation, South Coast AQMD staff will be unable to complete a review of the air quality analyses
in a timely manner. Any delays in providing all supporting documentation will require additional time for
review beyond the end of the comment period.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Sahar Ghadimi
Air Quality Specialist, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
South Coast Air Quality Management District
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909) 396-2392
sghadimi@aqmd.gov
C-1
Comment Letter C
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter C – South Coast Air Quality Management District
Response C-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s participation in the public
review process. During the public review period, a supplemental comment letter was received from South Coast Air
Quality Management District with comments on the air quality analysis of the Draft IS/MND; refer to Comment Letter I.
This commentor requests an electronic copy of any live modeling and emission calculation files that were used to
quantify the air quality impacts from construction and/or operation of the Proposed Project. The requested live modeling
and emission calculation files were transmitted on November 17, 2023 via email. Additionally, the Draft IS/MND and
Appendices are available on the City’s website: https://www.grandterrace-
ca.gov/departments/planning_development_services.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Palafox, Daniel <DPalafox@riversideca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 10:58 AM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Taylor, Matthew <MTaylor@riversideca.gov>; Watson, Scott <SWatson@riversideca.gov>;
Yamamoto, Blake <BYamamoto@riversideca.gov>
Subject: City of Riverside's Review of a NOA/NOI to Adopt of MND for the Hines Warehouse Project
Good morning Scott,
The City of Riverside has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Hines
Warehouse project located 21801 Barton Road and would like to provide the following
informational comment for your awareness.
The Riverside Public Utilities – Water Department is currently executing a licensing agreement
with the developer of the project for the surface use of the property including the parking lot
and access agreement.
Should you have any questions, feel free out to me or to Blake Yamamoto, Principal Engineer.
Thank you.
Daniel Palafox | Associate Planner
City of Riverside | Planning Division
3900 Main Street, Riverside, CA 92522
E: dpalafox@riversideca.gov
P: 951-826-5985
Stay in-the-know with all things Riverside! Connect with us at RiversideCA.gov/Connect.
D-1
Comment Letter D
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter D – City of Riverside
Response D-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the City of Riverside’s participation in the public review process. This commentor
notes that Riverside Public Utilities Water Department is currently executing a licensing agreement with the developer
of the project for the surface use of the property including the parking lot and access agreement. The comment is
acknowledged. Since this comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND or raise
an issue or comment specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis under CEQA, no further
response is warranted. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and respond to
comments raised on environmental issues.) A copy of this letter has been provided to the applicant.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 (213) 572-
0400
November 30, 2023
Scott Hutter VIA EMAIL TO:
Development Services Director SHutter@grandterrace-ca.gov
City of Grand Terrace
Planning and Development Services Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
Subject: Comments on Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project MND (SCH NO.
2023100788)
Dear Mr. Hutter,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the
proposed Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project. Please accept and consider these comments
on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA). Also, Golden State
Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding
any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of
determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice
Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.
1.0 Summary
The project proposes the construction and operation of one approximately 170,152 square foot (sf)
warehouse building on an approximately 9.2 acre site. The proposed building would be composed
of approximately 115,026 square feet of warehouse space (referred to in the MND as “product
storage area”), 50,326 square feet of assembly area, and 4,800 square feet of office space. The
project includes 18 truck/trailer dock doors and 240 passenger car parking spaces.
2.0 Project Description
The Project Description states that “The earthwork volumes are estimated at approximately 11,700
cubic yards of cut and 13,000 cubic yards of fill dirt, resulting in approximately 1,300 cubic yards
of import soil.” There is no mechanism for public verification of this conclusion, such as a grading
plan, included in the MND. An EIR must be prepared to include a grading plan to determine the
Comment Letter E
E-1
E-2
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 2
quantity of soils/materials to be imported/exported from the site. These grading truck hauling trips
must be included for all sections of environmental analysis, including but not limited to the Air
Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Transportation analysis.
The MND does not include a detailed site plan, floor plan, grading plan, or elevations for the
proposed project. The basic components of a Planning Application include a site plan, floor plan,
grading plan, elevations, and written narrative. The figure provided in Exhibit 2-3: Conceptual
Site Plan has been edited for public review to remove any and all site-specific information.
Providing a detailed site plan for public review is vital as it provides information such as the
earthwork quantity notes, parking requirements, site coverage, floor area ratio, the notes block,
etc. The elevation provided in Exhibit 2-4: Project Rendering does not provide any useful
information, such as the building height or the colors/materials palette. The site plan and elevations
provided are not useful for public review and do not satisfy CEQA’s requirements for meaningful
disclosure and adequate informational documents (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation
by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as these documents contribute directly to
analysis of the problem at hand. An EIR must be prepared to include all of these application items
in their unedited and wholly complete form, and recirculated for public review.
The project requires approval of the following discretionary applications in order to proceed:
1.Conditional Use Permit (CUP 22-02)
2.Lot Merger (LM 22-02)
3.Site and Architectural Review (SA 22-08)
4.Environmental (E 22-06) CEQA Compliance
4.3 Air Quality, 4.6 Energy, and 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Please refer to attachments from SWAPE for a complete technical commentary and analysis.
The MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing
potential impacts, including cumulative impacts generated by the proposed project. This is
especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. According
to CalEnviroScreen 4.01, CalEPA s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for
pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project s census tract (6071007107) ranks
worse than 87% of the rest of the state in overall pollution burden. The surrounding community,
including sensitive receptors such as the residential neighborhood and manufactured residential
community to the north, bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted
1 CalEnviroScreen 4.0 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40
E-2
E-3
E-2
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 3
than average on every pollution indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project
census tract ranks in the 99th percentile for ozone burden, the 84th percentile for particulate matter
(PM) 2.5 burden, 96th percentile for diesel PM burden, and 92nd percentile for traffic impacts. All
of these environmental factors are attributed to heavy truck activity in the area. Ozone can cause
lung irritation, inflammation, and worsening of existing chronic health conditions, even at low
levels of exposure2. Exhaust fumes contain toxic chemicals that can damage DNA, cause cancer,
make breathing difficult, and cause low weight and premature births3. The very small particles of
diesel PM can reach deep into the lung, where they can contribute to a range of health problems.
These include irritation to the eyes, throat and nose, heart and lung disease, and lung cancer 4.
The census tract ranks in the 61st percentile for drinking water, which indicates that it ranks with
the worst quality drinking water in the state. Poor communities areas are exposed to contaminants
in their drinking water more often than people in other parts of the state5.The census tract ranks in
the 70th percentile for solid waste facility impacts, which can expose people to hazardous
chemicals, release toxic gases into the air (even after these facilites are closed), and chemicals can
leach into soil around the facility and pose a health risk to nearby populations6.
The census tract also bears more impacts from cleanup sites than 69% of the state. Chemicals in
the buildings, soil, or water at cleanup sites can move into nearby communities through the air or
movement of water7. The census tract also ranks in the 60th percentile for toxic releases. People
living near facilities that emit toxic releases may breathe contaminated air regularly or if
contaminants are released during an accident8.
Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 60% Hispanic, 16% African-American,
and 3% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of
pollution. The community has a high rate of low educational attainment, meaning 75% of the
census tract over age 25 has not attained a high school diploma, which is an indication that they
may lack health insurance or access to medical care. The community has a high rate of poverty,
meaning 88% of the households in the census tract have a total income before taxes that is less
than the poverty level. Income can affect health when people cannot afford healthy living and
2 OEHHA Ozone https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/air-quality-ozone
3 OEHHA Traffic https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/traffic-density
4 OEHHA Diesel Particulate Matter https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/diesel-particulate-
matter
5 OEHHA Drinking Water https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/drinking-water
6 OEHHA Solid Waste Facilities https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/solid-waste-sites-and-
facilities
7 OEHHA Cleanup Sites https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/cleanup-sites
8 OEHHA Toxic Releases https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/toxic-releases-facilities
E-3
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 4
working conditions, nutritious food and necessary medical care9. Poor communities are often
located in areas with high levels of pollution10. Poverty can cause stress that weakens the immune
system and causes people to become ill from pollution11. Living in poverty is also an indication
that residents may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Medical care is vital for this
census tract as it ranks in the 69th percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease and 63rd
percentile for incidence of asthma. The census tract also has a high rate of linguistic isolation,
meaning 67% of households speak little to no English and face further inequities as a result.
Additionally, the project’s census tract (6071007107) is identified as a SB 535 Disadvantaged
Community12, which is not discussed or presented for analysis in the MND. Census tracts adjacent
to the project site (6071007109 (east); 6071004004 (west); 6071007108 (north); 6071012500
(north); and 6065042300 (south)) are also identified as SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities. This
indicates that cumulative impacts of development and negative environmental impacts in the City
and surrounding area are disproportionately effecting these communities. The MND does not
discuss that the project site and surrounding area are disadvantaged communities and does not
utilize this information in its analysis. The negative environmental, health, and quality of life
impacts of the warehousing and logistics industry in the City have become distinctly inequitable.
The severity of impacts particularly on these Disadvantaged Communities must be included for
analysis as part of an EIR.
The State of California lists three approved compliance modeling softwares13 for non-residential
buildings: CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, and IES VE. CalEEMod is not listed as an approved
software. The CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency
Standards and under-reports the project s significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the
public and decision makers. Since the MND did not accurately or adequately model the energy
impacts in compliance with Title 24, a finding of significance must be made. An EIR with
modeling using one of the approved software types must be prepared and circulated for public
review in order to adequately analyze the project s significant environmental impacts. This is vital
as the MND utilizes CalEEMod as a source in its methodology and analysis, which is clearly not
an approved software.
9 OEHHA Poverty https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/poverty
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid.
12 OEHHA SB 535 Census Tracts https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535
13 California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022-
building-energy-efficiency-1
E-3
E-4
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 5
Table 11: Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions provides emissions reduction credits for “existing
uses.” It is not appropriate to model the existing site as fully operational utilizing default
rates/average rates and provide VMT and emission reduction credits based on “existing uses” that
do not actually exist and does not provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the
project s impacts pursuant to CEQA Section 15125. The Project Description/Environmental
Setting within the MND also notes that the project site is not fully operational, in stating that, “At
the time of initiating the project s environmental baseline (March 2023), the site was developed
with three (3) buildings consisting of the following businesses: Nu-Ray Metals (manufacturer and
installer of metal siding and roofing materials), Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. (sewer mainline
cleaning and video inspection company), and a former administrative building. These three (3)
buildings were approximately 12,950 square feet in size and located along the northeastern portion
of the project site. As of August 2023, these buildings have since been demolished for safety
reasons.” The MND states clearly that the total 12,950 sf building area was not completely
occupied as one of the three buildings is a former administrative building.
Additionally, it is clear that the Environmental Setting provided is erroneous and misleading in
order to artificially inflate “existing” emissions/VMT and credit the proposed project with
associated reductions. By December 2022, former tenant Houston & Harris PCS filed with the
Secretary of State that their principal business address had moved to San Bernardino, CA14. At
minimum, this demonstrates that the arbitrary Environmental Setting date of March 2023 within
the MND is inaccurate. The existing conditions of the site in March 2023 likely generated
significantly lower VMT and significantly lower vehicle trips due to the existing vacant site
conditions.
Further, CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)(1) states that, “Where existing conditions change or
fluctuate over time, and where necessary to provide the most accurate picture practically possible
of the project s impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by referencing historic
conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or both, that are
supported with substantial evidence,” and CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)(3) states that, “An
existing conditions baseline shall not include hypothetical conditions, such as those that might be
allowed, but have never actually occurred, under existing permits or plans, as the baseline.” The
MND and its appendices model the existing site as fully operational utilizing default rates/average
rates. The physical conditions and actual emissions/vehicle traffic counts that existed at the time
of analysis are not described or discussed with meaningful supporting evidence in the MND.
Utilizing emissions default rates/average rates instead of actual traffic counts and emissions
14 Houston & Harris PCS Statement of Information December 2022
https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/api/report/GetImageByNum/250216187047222091138044195074202115114236096
029
E-5
E-6
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 6
analysis at the project site during business operations serves to artificially reduce the project’s
significant environmental impacts by modeling the alleged businesses onsite as more traffic
intensive than they actually were.
The MND has not provided meaningful, substantial evidence to support the claim that the previous
on-site uses were operational at the time environmental analysis commenced. Information
provided in the Phase 1 ESA demonstrates that all buildings at the project site were vacant in May
2023, including interior photos of the empty remaining buildings, dumpsters and onsite debris
from recently demolished buildings, and the concrete pad remnants of those former buildings.
Additionally, the Phase 1 ESA includes statements that the buildings are vacant.
It is clear that this is an effort to artificially reduce the GHG Emissions generated by the proposed
project to less than significant levels. Removing the “existing uses” emissions credits (873
MTC02e) indicates that the project will generate 3,616 MTC02e annually, which exceeds the
3,000 MTC02e annual threshold. An EIR must be prepared to remove the “existing uses”
emissions credits and include a finding of significance because the proposed project exceeds the
applicable threshold.
Table 13: Consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS provides a misleading and erroneous
consistency analysis with SCAG’s 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS that concludes the project
does not conflict with any Connect SoCal Goals. Due to errors in modeling (and improper
emissions reductions credits to onsite uses that did not actually exist and substantial evidence to
support those claims were not provided) as noted throughout this comment letter and attachments,
the proposed project has signifiant potential for inconsistency with Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 6 to support healthy and equitable communities, and
Goal 7 to adapt to a changing climate. An EIR must be prepared to include revised, accurate
modeling and a consistency analysis with all goals of SCAG’s 2020-2045 Connect SoCal
RTP/SCS.
4.11 Land Use and Planning
The MND does not provide any information regarding the buildout conditions of the City’s
General Plan. Table 2.5: Nonresidential Buildout Estimates of the General Plan notes that the
Light Industrial designation supports the development of 1,398,276 sf of building space through
the document’s 2025 horizon year15. The project’s proposed 170,152 sf of building space is 12.2%
of the total Light Industrial space permitted over the 15 year General Plan period, which represents
15 General Plan EIR https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12337255/File/Departments/Planning%20&%20Development/Planni
ng/draft_eir.pdf
E-6
E-7
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 7
a significant amount of growth for a single project. An EIR must be prepared to provide a
cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects in
the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed SCAG s and/or the City s General Plan growth
estimates for the City.
The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. The Light Industrial
designation permits “small scale warehouse and distribution.” The MND attempts to characterize
the project as an Assembly and Light Manufacturing project to demonstrate compliance with the
General Plan Light Industrial land use designation. However, the project does not provide any
manufacturing area. Assembly is the assemblage of finished parts into a product for consumption.
The project name of “Assembly and Light Manufacturing” is misleading as the proposed building
is clearly designed to function primarily as a distribution center/warehouse building. Table 1:
Project Characteristics of the MND attempts to support the facade that the project as an
assembly/light manufacturing use by characterizing the primary warehouse area as “product
storage.” Even if it is true that 50,326 square feet of the building will be utilized as assembly area,
this is only 29.5% of the 170,152 total square foot building area utilized for this function. The
“product storage” (warehouse/distribution) area is 115,026 square feet and comprises 67.6% of the
170,152 total square foot building area. Therefore, warehousing/distribution is the primary use of
the building and does not comply with the Light Industrial land use designation of the General
Plan. A General Plan Amendment is required to allow primarily warehousing/distribution uses
within the Light Industrial designation and an EIR must be prepared to include this information
for analysis.
The MND does not provide a consistency analysis with all land use plans, policies, or regulations
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project has
significant potential to conflict with many of these items, including but not limited to the following
from the General Plan:
1.Circulation Element Goal 3.1 Provide a comprehensive transportation system that provides for
the current and long-term efficient movement of people and goods within and through the City.
2.Circulation Element Policy 3.1.1: Provide a transportation system which supports planned land
uses and improves the quality of life.
3.Circulation Element Policy 3.1.7: The maximum acceptable Level of Service for streets
identified in the City Master Plan of Streets and Highways during peak hours shall be LOS
D”.
4.Circulation Element Goal 3.3: Provide for a safe circulation system.
5.Circulation Element Policy 3.3.1: Promote the safe and effective movement of all segments of
the population and the efficient transport of goods.
E-7
E-8
E-9
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 8
6.Circulation Element Policy 3.3.2: The City shall require that new developments provide
adequate off street parking in order to minimize the need for on street parking.
7.Circulation Element Policy 3.3.4: The City shall route truck traffic away from residential areas
and work with regional agencies in order to mitigate potential impacts from regional traffic.
4.14 Population and Housing
The MND states that “Based on information from the project applicant, operation of the project
would generate approximately 175 new employees.” However, the source of this calculation and
the information from the project applicant are not included. There are no methods for the public
to verify that the project would only generate approximately 175 new employees. The MND
utilizes uncertain and misleading language which does not provide any meaningful analysis or
calculation of the project s population and employment (construction and operational) generation.
In order to comply with CEQA s requirements for meaningful disclosure, an EIR must be prepared
to provide an accurate estimate of employees generated by all uses of the proposed project. It must
also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill
these positions as the the MND also has not provided meaningful evidence that the local population
is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector. A construction worker employment
analysis must also be included to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant
environmental impacts. Additionally, any information from the project applicant utilized to
generate the employment estimates must be provided in an EIR. Incorporation by reference
(CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the information from the project applicant contributes
directly to analysis of the problem at hand. An EIR must be prepared to include the information
from the project applicant and the source of the MND’s calculation of approximately 175 new
employees.
The MND does not provide any information regarding the buildout conditions of the City’s
General Plan. Table 2.5: Nonresidential Buildout Estimates of the General Plan notes that buildout
of the Light Industrial designation will generate 1,398 new employees. Utilizing the MND’s
calculation of 175 employees, the proposed project accounts for 12.5% of the total employees
generated by the buildout of the Light Industrial land use designation. A single project accounting
for this amount of the projected employment growth over 15 years represents a significant amount
of growth. There is also no analysis of projects approved, proposed, or in the pipeline” within
the City to demonstrate that the combined workforce and population of all projects does not exceed
the growth estimates of the City’s General Plan or SCAG’s RTP/SCS. SCAG’s Connect SoCal
E-9
E-10
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 9
Demographics and Growth Forecast16 notes that Grand Terrace will add 2,600 jobs between 2016
-2045. Utilizing the MND's calculation of 175 employees, the project represents 6.7% of the
City’s employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of the
projected employment and/or population over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth.
An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis
discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project
will exceed employment growth forecasts from SCAG and/or the General Plan. Additionally, an
EIR must provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers
to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.
4.17 Transportation
Table 1: 21801 Barton Road Trip Generation within Appendix L: Trip Generation and VMT
Analysis provide trip generation reduction credits for “existing uses.” It is not appropriate to model
the existing vacant site as fully operational utilizing ITE default rates/average rates and provide
VMT and emission reduction credits based on “existing uses” that do not actually exist and does
not provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the project s impacts pursuant to
CEQA Section 15125. The Project Description/Environmental Setting within the MND also notes
that the project site is not fully operational, in stating that, “At the time of initiating the project s
environmental baseline (March 2023), the site was developed with three (3) buildings consisting
of the following businesses: Nu-Ray Metals (manufacturer and installer of metal siding and roofing
materials), Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. (sewer mainline cleaning and video inspection company),
and a former administrative building. These three (3) buildings were approximately 12,950 square
feet in size and located along the northeastern portion of the project site. As of August 2023, these
buildings have since been demolished for safety reasons.” The MND states clearly that the total
12,950 sf building area was not completely occupied as one of the three buildings is a former
administrative building.
Additionally, it is clear that the Environmental Setting provided is erroneous and misleading in
order to artificially inflate “existing” emissions/VMT and credit the proposed project with
associated reductions. By December 2022, former tenant Houston & Harris PCS filed with the
Secretary of State that their principal business address had moved to San Bernardino, CA17. At
minimum, this demonstrates that the arbitrary Environmental Setting date of March 2023 within
16 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020
https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growth-
forecast.pdf?1606001579
17 Houston & Harris PCS Statement of Information December 2022
https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/api/report/GetImageByNum/250216187047222091138044195074202115114236096
029
E-10
E-11
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 10
the MND is inaccurate. The existing conditions of the site in March 2023 likely generated
significantly lower VMT and significantly lower vehicle trips due to the existing vacant site
conditions.
Further, CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)(1) states that, “Where existing conditions change or
fluctuate over time, and where necessary to provide the most accurate picture practically possible
of the project s impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by referencing historic
conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or both, that are
supported with substantial evidence,” and CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)(3) states that, “An
existing conditions baseline shall not include hypothetical conditions, such as those that might be
allowed, but have never actually occurred, under existing permits or plans, as the baseline.” The
MND and its appendices model the existing site as fully operational utilizing ITE default
rates/average rates. The physical conditions and actual vehicle traffic counts that existed at the
time of analysis are not described or discussed with meaningful supporting evidence in the MND.
Utilizing ITE default rates/average rates instead of traffic counts at the project site during business
operations serves to artificially reduce the project’s significant environmental impacts by modeling
the alleged businesses onsite as more traffic intensive than they actually were.
The MND has not provided meaningful, substantial evidence to support the claim that the previous
on-site uses were operational at the time environmental analysis commenced. Information
provided in the Phase 1 ESA demonstrates that all buildings at the project site were vacant in May
2023, including interior photos of the empty remaining buildings, dumpsters and onsite debris
from recently demolished buildings, and the concrete pad remnants of those former buildings.
Additionally, the Phase 1 ESA includes statements that the buildings are vacant.
It is clear that this is an effort to artificially appease the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis
Guidelines18. The Guidelines state that a, “TIA which includes LOS analysis shall be required for
a proposed project that meets any of the following criteria: Projects that will add 51 or more trips
during either the AM or PM peak hours to any intersection.”
Table 1: 21801 Barton Road Trip Generation within Appendix L: Trip Generation and VMT
Analysis shows that the project will generate 654 total PCE daily vehicle trips, including 82 PCE
trips during the AM peak hour and 87 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. Table 1 credits the
proposed project trip reductions for the buildings located on the project site utilizing ITE default
trip rates, including 181 total PCE daily vehicle trips, 32 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and
38 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. After the credits, the proposed project generates 473 total
18 Grand Terrace Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
https://grandterracecityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1618&Inline=True
E-12
E-11
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 11
PCE daily vehicle trips, 50 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 49 PCE trips during the PM
peak hour. The AM/PM PCE peak hour trips are conveniently 1 and 2 fewer PCE trips than the
51 PCE peak hour trips threshold. The MND concludes the project will have less than significant
impacts due to the trip reduction credits.
However, the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines do not permit or contemplate the
possibility of trip reduction credits based on existing uses in such analysis. It is therefore even
more egregious that the MND improperly utilized trip reduction credits as this is not permitted by
the City’s Guidelines. Removing the “existing uses” trip generation credits indicates that the
project will generate 82 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 87 PCE trips during the PM peak
hour. Therefore, a TIA and LOS analysis are required and must be included as part of a project
EIR. The MND has not analyzed the project in accordance with the City Guidelines and utilizes
an artificially low “net new trips” generated by the project in order to exempt itself from
conducting a project-specific LOS/VMT analysis. The project trip generation must be revised to
remove any credit given for the existing buildings in order to accurately and adequately analyze
the project’s trip generation in accordance with the City’s Guidelines and the City’s General Plan
LOS requirements.
Further, the MND has not provided meaningful evidence to support the conclusion that Mitigation
Measure T-1 will reduce project generated VMT to below the significance threshold of 28.0 VMT
per employee continuously for the life of the project. Since future building tenants are unknown
at this time, implementation of trip reduction measures cannot be guaranteed to reduce Project
generated VMT to a level of less than significant. It is not possible for the City to ensure that
Mitigation Measure T-1 will result in reduced VMT by project employees and be implemented
continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a VMT reduction to less
than significant levels at all times. The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction
of VMT impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured and the project’s VMT impact
is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding
of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of project employees that
would utilize non-automobile travel associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the
project’s VMT impact to less than significant is not feasible.
Further, the MND has underreported the quantity VMT generated by the proposed project
operations. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of
truck/trailer/delivery van VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution
centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees
arrive at work at the proposed project, they will conduct their jobs by driving delivery vans across
the region as part of the daily operations as a distribution facility, which will drastically increase
E-13
E-12
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 12
project-generated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize
public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to
exclude this activity from VMT analysis. The project’s total operational VMT generated is not
consistent with the significance threshold and legislative intent of SB 743 to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions by reducing VMT. An EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis
that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity.
The MND has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses;
or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits
adequately depicting the onsite turning radius available for trucks maneuvering throughout the site
or the maneuvering area available at the intersection of the project driveway and adjacent street.
Notably, passenger car parking stalls are located within the truck/trailer loading dock court on the
west building. These parking stalls may be in use at any time and further restrict truck/trailer
movement on the site and present a safety hazard with potential for conflicts between passenger
cars and trucks/trailers. Additionally, the project site has a single driveway access point along
Barton Road that will be utilized for access by both truck/trailers and passenger cars. The overall
site design presents several potential conflicts in maneuvering area for both passenger cars and
trucks/trailers that have not been analyzed.
The MND also states that, “The project is subject to discretionary review by the Public Works
Director and City Traffic Engineer to determine whether the development provides adequate on-
site and off-site roadway improvements for the safety of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. A
Circulation Site Plan has been developed for the project to ensure safe access to and from the
development and to provide recommended roadway and/or traffic signal improvements to the
satisfaction of City Traffic Engineer recommendations.” However, the City’s
determination/review of the project is not included for public review, and neither is the Circulation
Site Plan. There are no exhibits depicting the available space onsite throughout the project site to
accommodate heavy truck maneuvering. There are also no exhibits depicting emergency vehicle
access. This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents
and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA §
15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the City’s determination/review of the project and the Circulation
Site Plan contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. Deferring this environmental
analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does
not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational
documents. An EIR must be prepared to include the City’s determination/review of the project and
the Circulation Site Plan for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in
order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.
E-13
E-14
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page 13
4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the
impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. For example, SCAG’s Connect SoCal
Demographics and Growth Forecast19 notes that the City will add 2,600 jobs between 2016 - 2045.
Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 175 employees, the project represents 6.7% of the City s
employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of the
projected employment and/or population over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth.
This total increases exponentially when commercial development activity and other industrial
projects are added to the calculation. Further, Table 2.5: Nonresidential Buildout Estimates of the
General Plan notes that buildout of the Light Industrial designation will generate 1,398 new
employees. Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 175 employees, the proposed project accounts for
12.5% of the total employees generated by the buildout of the Light Industrial land use designation.
A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment growth over 15 years
represents a significant amount of growth. An EIR must be prepared to include this information
for analysis and also include a cumulative development analysis of projects approved since 2016
and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the proposed project exceeds SCAG’s growth
forecasts and projects approved since General Plan adoption and projects “in the pipeline” to
determine if the proposed project exceeds General Plan growth estimates for cumulative analysis.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for
the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice
Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental
documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all
communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA
92877.
Sincerely,
19 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020
https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growth-
forecast.pdf?1606001579
E-15
E-16
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter
November 30, 2023
Page
14
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachments:
1. We will send the SWAPE Analysis next week by December 5, 2023
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter E – Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Response E-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates Blum, Collins & Ho LLP’s participation in the public review process. This
comment is submitted by Blu, Collins & Ho LLP on behalf of the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA).
This comment requests GSEJA to be added to the project’s distribution list. The comment is acknowledged. Since this
comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND or raise an issue or comment
specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis under CEQA, no further response is warranted.
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and respond to comments raised on
environmental issues.) As requested, both entities have been added to the project’s distribution list. During the public
review period, a supplemental comment letter was received from Blum, Collins & Ho LLP; refer to Comment Letter G.
Response E-2
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not contain a detailed site plan, floor plan, grading plan, or elevations
for the proposed project. This comment is acknowledged. The Draft IS/MND provides several graphic depictions which
demonstrate the proposed project description including Exhibit 2-3, Conceptual Site Plan and Exhibit 2-4, Project
Rendering. Further, the preliminary grading plan, detailed site plan, floor plan, elevations, and landscape plan for the
proposed project are on-file with the City. The Draft IS/MND is consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(d)
which outlines the required contents of an Initial Study.
Response E-3
This comment notes the presence of sensitive receptors in the community surrounding the project site. This comment
notes the surrounding disadvantaged community and requests an EIR be prepared to fully analyze impacts to the
community. This comment is acknowledged. It should be noted that neither the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) nor the City of Grand Terrace have established thresholds and regulations specifically for
disadvantaged communities. The air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) thresholds were established to protect the
general population, taking into consideration the most vulnerable people. Further, the SCAQMD and the State CEQA
Guidelines Appendix G Checklist utilized by the City do not require discussion or analysis on disadvantaged
communities. Therefore, it is not necessary to discuss or analyze disadvantaged communities in the IS/MND, and an
EIR is also not necessary in this regard.
Response E-4
This comment notes that CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards
and requests an EIR to be prepared. California’s Building Energy Code Compliance Software (CBECC) is for Building
Energy Efficiency Standards compliance modeling and is not suitable for CEQA compliance analysis. CalEEMod is the
most appropriate modeling tool to estimate the project’s energy consumption for CEQA compliance purposes. As such,
the Draft IS/MND adequately discloses the potential impacts of the project in this regard.
Response E-5
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not accurately convey baseline conditions of the project site. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Master Response 1. The existing condition of the project is correctly identified in
the Draft IS/MND. CEQA Guidelines require evaluating project impacts by comparing with existing conditions, and
therefore taking emission reduction credits from the existing uses on-site is appropriate.
Response E-6
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not accurately convey baseline conditions of the project site. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Master Response 1. The existing condition of the project is correctly identified in
the Draft IS/MND. CEQA Guidelines require evaluating project impacts by comparing with existing conditions, and
therefore taking emission reduction credits from the existing uses on-site is appropriate. As such, the consistency with
the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS analysis is also accurate.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response E-7
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not contain information regarding the project’s consistency with
buildout of the City’s General Plan. This comment is acknowledged. The project is consistent with the City’s General
Plan. Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, Table 10, General Plan Project Consistency Analysis, of the Draft IS/MND, which
outlines how the project is consistent with relevant goals and policies of the General Plan.
Response E-8
This comment notes that the proposed project is not compliant with the City’s General Plan designation of Light
Industrial. This comment is acknowledged. The City’s General Plan defines Light Industrial is as “Permitted uses for
properties designated as Light Industrial include those uses that can be made compatible with other surrounding uses
within the City regarding noise, dust, odors, vibration, glare, air quality, traffic, aesthetics, and hazardous materials.
Typical uses may include light manufacturing and assembly, small scale warehousing and distribution, research and
development, and administrative and service types of uses.” Thus, warehousing and distribution is a compatible use,
and the project is consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan.
Response E-9
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not provide a consistency analysis with circulation goals of the City’s
General Plan. This comment is acknowledged. As stated in the Draft IS/MND,” The project does not propose permanent
alterations to vehicular circulation routes or obstruct public access along adjacent roadways”. Additionally, Draft
IS/MND Section 4.17, Transportation, analyzes whether the project would “conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities”. The traffic
analysis found that impacts would be less than significant.
Response E-10
This comment notes that the projected number of employees for the proposed project (approximately 175) accounts
for significant growth. This comment is acknowledged. The Draft IS/MND identified the increase in employees as
minimal in comparison to the increase anticipated in the SCAG Growth Forecast.
Response E-11
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not accurately convey baseline conditions of the project site. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Master Response 1. The existing condition of the project is correctly identified in
the Draft IS/MND. The State CEQA Guidelines require evaluating project impacts by comparing with existing conditions,
and therefore taking trip reduction credits from the existing uses on-site is appropriate.
Response E-12
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not accurately convey baseline conditions of the project site. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Master Response 1. The existing condition of the project is correctly identified in
the Draft IS/MND. The State CEQA Guidelines require evaluating project impacts by comparing with existing conditions,
and therefore taking trip reduction credits from the existing uses on-site is appropriate.
The City of Grand Terrace Traffic Impact Guidelines (July 2020) do not state that the use of trips credits is prohibited.
The use of exiting trip credits is a standard best-practice and the analysis process is adequate. Additionally, the trip
threshold determination of whether a level of service (LOS) analysis is required is based on the number of peak hour
trips, not Passenger Car Equivalents (PCEs).
Response E-13
This comment notes that the Draft IS/MND does not accurately convey baseline conditions of the project site. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Master Response 1 and Response E-12.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
The VMT analysis followed the appropriate guidelines and standard practices including the City of Grand Terrace
Traffic Impact Guidelines (July 2020). Regarding the evaluation of heavy vehicles, the Governor’s Office of Planning
and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory provides guidance on Vehicle Types under the Methodology section.
Specifically, “For the purposes of this section, ‘vehicle miles traveled’ refers to the amount and distance of automobile
travel attributable to a project.” Here, the term “automobile” refers to on-road passenger vehicles, specifically cars and
light trucks.”
Response E-14
This comment notes that project hazards related to circulation have not been adequately analyzed. This comment is
acknowledged. The project’s circulation plan has been reviewed by the City and its traffic engineer representatives and
was found to be complete as part of the entitlement application process. CEQA does not require the inclusion of every
plan set [sheet] within an environmental compliance document. The Draft IS/MND is consistent with State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15063(d), which outlines the required contents of an Initial Study.
Response E-15
This comment notes that the projected employment for the proposed project constitute significant growth. This
comment is acknowledged. Please refer to Response E-10.
Response E-16
This comment requests an EIR to be prepared, and the commenter requests to be added to the project’s distribution
list. This comment is acknowledged. Please refer to Response E-1. Further, the Draft IS/MND concluded the CEQA
Appendix G Checklist resource topics would result in a finding of no impact, less than significant, or less than significant
with mitigation; and therefore, an Initial Study is the appropriate environmental compliance document.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: A S <asalcido.07@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 2:11 PM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Unknown <jbourg2271@aol.com>; jbourgeois029@gmail.com; Terrance Lucio
<t.lucio57@gmail.com>; Rich Golding <rcgolding@aol.com>
Subject: Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Good Afternoon Mr. Hutter,
Please provide any updates to the above mentioned project.
I am requesting under Public Resource Code Section 21092.2 to add the email addresses and mailing
address below to the notification list, regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public
notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project.
t.lucio57@gmail.com
rcgolding@aol.com
jbourg2271@aol.com
jbourgeois029@gmail.com
asalcido.07@gmail.com
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
Please confirm receipt of this email.
Thank You,
Adam Salcido
F-1
Comment Letter F
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter F – Adam Salcido
Response F-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates Adam Salcido’s participation in the public review process. This comment
requests to be added to the project’s distribution list. The comment is acknowledged. Since this comment does not
identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND or raise an issue or comment specifically related to
the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis under CEQA, no further response is warranted. (CEQA Guidelines Section
15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and respond to comments raised on environmental issues.) The
provided email addresses and PO Box address have been added to the project’s distribution list. As requested, the
City provided an update on 12/5/2023 indicting there were no updates to report at the time.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Angelica Zhou <zhou@blumcollins.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 1:49 PM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Madison Kumai <madison@blumcollins.com>; Gary Ho <ho@blumcollins.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project MND (SCH NO. 2023100788)
Dear Scott,
Attached is the SWAPE Technical Analysis to supplement our letter.
Sincerely,
Angelica Zhou
Legal Assistant
Blum Collins Ho, LLP
Comment Letter G
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape.com
December 4, 2023
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (SCH No. 2023100788)
Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the October 2023 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (“Project”) located in the City of Grand Terrace
(“City”). The Project proposes to construct a 171,300-square-foot (“SF”) manufacturing building and 240
vehicle parking spaces on the 9.2-acre site.
Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the air quality and health risk
impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of
the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact
Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health
risk impacts that the project may have on the environment.
Air Quality Failure to Provide CalEEMod Output Files
The IS/MND relies on the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) to estimate the Project’s
construction and operational criteria air pollutant emissions, stating:
“The following assumptions were used in the analysis of the proposed project’s construction-
related air emissions impacts: [...]
•Construction equipment inventory was derived from the CalEEMod model equipment
inventory…” (p. 33).
G-1
G-2
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
2
Specifically, the IS/MND states that “Project-Generated Construction Emissions, presents the anticipated
daily short-term construction emissions; refer to Appendix F, AQ, GHG, and Energy Analysis, for the
CalEEMod outputs and results” (p. 34). Furthermore, the IS/MND relies on the CalEEMod to estimate
the Project’s operational air pollutant emissions, stating:
“The area source and energy source operational emissions for the project and the Existing Land
Use were derived from the default estimates produced by the CalEEMod model” (IS/MND, pp.
37).
However, review of Appendix F, demonstrates that the while the inputs used for the CalEEMod models
are provided, the output files which disclose the Project’s emissions are not provided.1 As the IS/MND
fails to disclose the CalEEMod output files used to estimate the Project’s construction and operational
emissions, we cannot verify that the IS/MND’s air modeling and subsequent analysis are accurate. We
recommend that the Project not be approved until a complete air quality analysis, including the
associated air modeling, is prepared and disclosed. SWAPE Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact
In an effort to quantitatively estimate the Project’s construction-related emissions, we utilized the
CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0,2 as well as Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND and
associated documents. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific
information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical
equipment associated with project type.
In our model, we included 165,352-SF of “General Heavy Industrial,” 4,800-SF of “General Office
Building” land use, and 240 parking spaces (p. 9, Table 1).3 We also assumed that the Project would be
located within Climate Zone 10 4 and the Project’s utilities would be provided by Southern California
Edison (p. 48). Additionally, we included the following assumptions listed in the IS/MND:
•“Construction would commence in Spring 2024 for a duration of approximately 15 months;
•Grading activity would involve the import of 7,000 cubic yards of soil;
•Fugitive dust mitigation was applied as per SCAQMD Rule 403 – Fugitive Dust (2 times
watering per day), limiting vehicle speed on unpaved surfaces to 15 miles per hour, and soil
moisture maintained at 12 percent);
• Construction equipment inventory was derived from the CalEEMod model equipment
inventory; and
1 Best presented as PDFs to allow for visibility of the changes to default values and the associated emissions
estimates.
2 “CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), March 2022,
available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model.
3 115,026-SF Product Storage Area + 50,326-SF Assembly Area = 165,352-SF General Heavy Industrial
4 “Appendix F – Climate Zones Lookup.” CAPCOA, September 2016, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, pp. 15.
G-2
cont.
G-3
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
3
• Demolition and hauling of approximately 10,000 tons of existing structures and asphalt
hardscape” (p. 33).
All other values were left as default.
Our analysis estimates that the reactive organic gases (“ROG”) emissions associated with Project
construction and operation exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District
(“SCAQMD”) threshold of 75-lbs/day, as referenced by the IS/MND (p. 34, Table 2) (see table below).5
SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction ROG
(lbs/day)
SWAPE 80.4
SCAQMD Threshold 75
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated in the table above, the Project’s construction-related ROG emissions, as estimated by
SWAPE, exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. Our modeling demonstrates that the
Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or
addressed by the IS/MND. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the
potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the environment. Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated
The IS/MND concludes that the proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant health risk
impact based on a quantified construction and mobile-source operational health risk assessment
(“HRA”). Specifically, the IS/MND estimates that the maximum incremental cancer risk posed to nearby,
existing residential sensitive receptors associated with exposure to diesel particulate matter (“DPM”)
emissions during Project construction and operation would be 1.1 in one million, which would not
exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 38, Table 6).
5 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, March 2023, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/south-coast-aqmd-air-quality-significance-
thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=25.
G-3
cont.
G-4
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
4
However, the IS/MND’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the
subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for two reasons.
First, the IS/MND’s construction HRA is incorrect, as it relies upon emissions estimates from an
unsubstantiated air model, as discussed above in section of this letter titled “SWAPE Analysis Indicates a
Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact.” As a result, the HRA may rely on an underestimated DPM
concentration to calculate the health risk associated with Project construction. As such, the IS/MND’s
construction HRA and the resulting cancer risk should not be relied upon to determine Project
significance.
Second, the IS/MND fails to mention the exposure assumptions for the construction-related and
operational HRAs, such as age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) or fraction of time at home (“FAH”) values
whatsoever. Until the IS/MND substantiates the use of correct exposure assumptions, the HRAs may
underestimate the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors due to Project construction
and operation. Furthermore, according to the Risk Assessment Guidelines provided by the Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing
G-4
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
5
guidance on conducting HRAs in California, the IS/MND’s HRA should have used the following
equation:6
However, the IS/MND fails to mention or provide a dose and risk equation to calculate the Project’s
construction and operational cancer risks. As such, we cannot verify that the IS/MND’s HRA is accurate,
and the Project’s cancer risks may be underestimated.
Mitigation Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions
Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk,
and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce emissions, the Project should
consider the implementation of the following mitigation measures found in the California Department of
Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.7
•Requiring off-road construction equipment to be hybrid electric-diesel or zero emission, where
available, and all diesel-fueled off-road construction equipment to be equipped with CARB Tier
IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents,
purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply
the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction
activities.
•Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10
hours per day.
•Using electric-powered hand tools, forklifts, and pressure washers, and providing electrical hook
ups to the power grid rather than use of diesel-fueled generators to supply their power.
•Designating an area in the construction site where electric-powered construction vehicles and
equipment can charge.
6 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-7, Equation 8.2.4.
7 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10.
G-4
cont.
G-5
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
6
•Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area.
•Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for
particulates or ozone for the project area.
•Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than three minutes.
•Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all
equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission
control tier classifications.
•Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to
identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts.
•Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile
organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
•Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction
employees.
•Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for
construction employees.
•Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles engaged in drayage to or from the project site to be zero-
emission beginning in 2030.
•Requiring all on-site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be
zero-emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided.
•Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business
operations.
•Forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off
engines when not in use.
•Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery
areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the
local air district, and the building manager.
•Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation
capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all
electrical chargers.
•Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar
panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible.
•Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock
doors at the project.
•Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations.
•Unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property
ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space,
constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and
requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at
loading docks.
•Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to
accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability.
G-5
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
7
•Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the
number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking
spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging
performance)
•Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in
the number of electric light-duty charging stations.
•Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air
filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the
project.
•Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air
monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project,
and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not
mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the
affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid
exposure to unhealthy air.
•Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel.
•Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load
management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks.
•Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single-
occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation,
including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
•Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated
parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking.
•Designing to LEED green building certification standards.
•Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations.
•Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route.
•Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project
area.
•Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel
technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also
require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make
records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request.
•Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay
program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100
trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
•Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and
Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.
These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into
the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and
operation.
G-5
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
8
Furthermore, as it is policy of the State that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon
resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31,
2045, we emphasize the applicability of incorporating solar power system into the Project design. Until
the feasibility of incorporating on-site renewable energy production is considered, the Project should
not be approved.
An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air
quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are
implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment
to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s
significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.
Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become
available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional
information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of
care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants
practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing
results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was
reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or
otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by
third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗^tW ΖƐĂů DŽĚKƵƚƉƵƚ&ŝůĞƐ
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗DĂƚƚ,ĂŐĞŵĂŶŶs
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗WĂƵůZŽƐĞŶĨĞůĚs
G-5
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter G – Blum, Collins & Ho LLP (supplemental letter)
Response G-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates Blum, Collins & Ho LLP’s participation in the public review process. This
supplemental comment letter provided by Blum, Collins & Ho LLP includes comments from Soil/Water/Air Protection
Enterprise related to air quality and health risks impacts, associated modeling files, and resumes. This comment notes
air quality and health risk impacts have not been adequately addressed and requests the preparation of an EIR. This
comment is acknowledged. Refer to Responses G-2 through G-5.
Response G-2
This comment notes that CalEEMod output files were not provided. The complete CalEEMod output files for
construction and operation of the project are provided in Appendix F, CalEEMod Emission Summary (Data Attachment
starting from Page 34 of Appendix F), of the Draft IS/MND.
Response G-3
The commenter conducted a CalEEMod model run for the project and found reactive organic gases (ROG) emissions
exceeding SCAQMD threshold during project construction, and therefore claimed the project would cause significant
air quality impacts. This comment is acknowledged. The CalEEMod modeling conducted by the commenter is flawed
because an old CalEEMod version of 2020.4.0 was used. CalEEMod was updated to Version 2022.1 in December
2022, which incorporated updated default values based on the latest information available. Specifically, CalEEMod
Version 2020.4.0 assumed higher architectural coating areas per square foot of building area than CalEEMod Version
2022.1, resulting in higher ROG emissions during the architectural coating phase. Based on the CalEEMod modeling
conducted for the project using Version 2022.1, maximum daily ROG emissions during construction would be 68.2
pounds per day, which would not exceed SCAQMD threshold of 75 pounds per day; refer to Appendix F of the Draft
IS/MND. Therefore, project construction would not cause significant air quality impact, and the analysis in the Draft
IS/MND is accurate and adequate.
Response G-4
This comment notes the Draft IS/MND’s health risk assessment is incorrect. The health risk assessment in the Draft
IS/MND relies on emissions calculated from accurate CalEEMod models, as included in Appendix F, CalEEMod
Emission Summary, of the Draft IS/MND; refer to Response G-2. Furthermore, the Draft IS/MND includes detailed
exposure assumptions used to calculate cancer risks; refer to Appendix G, Health Risk Assessment, Page 9 through
Page 11, of the Draft IS/MND. The exposure assumptions are conservative and consistent with SCAQMD
requirements. Therefore, the health risk assessment analysis in the Draft IS/MND is accurate.
Response G-5
The commenter recommends mitigation measures to be incorporated into the project to mitigate the significant air
quality and health risk impacts. This comment is acknowledged. However, as discussed in Response G-2 through G-
4 above, the project’s air quality and health risk impact analysis is deemed adequate, and would not result in significant
air quality or health risk impacts, and therefore mitigation measures are not necessary or required. The project is
required to comply with 2022 Title 24 standards, which include requirements on solar panels. Therefore, mitigation
measures are not necessary for the project.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Madeline Dawson <madeline@lozeaudrury.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 4:17 PM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Layne Fajeau <layne@lozeaudrury.com>; Rebecca Davis <rebecca@lozeaudrury.com>; Marjan Kris
Abubo <marjan@lozeaudrury.com>
Subject: Comment re: Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project (CUP 22-02)
Dear Mr. Hutter:
Attached please find comments of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER")
regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Assembly and Light
Manufacturing Project (CUP 22-02, SA 22-08, LM 22-02, E22-06).
If you could confirm receipt of this email and the attached comments, it would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Madeline Dawson
--
Madeline Dawson (she/her)
Legal Assistant
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 836-4200
(510) 836-4205 (fax)
madeline@lozeaudrury.com
Comment Letter H C.1.a
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Via Email
December 5, 2023
Scott Hutter, Development Services Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
SHutter@grandterrace-ca.gov
Re: Comment on the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND) for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
Dear Mr. Hutter:
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
(“SAFER”) regarding the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project, including all actions
related or referring to the proposed construction of a 173,000 square foot (sf) assembly and light
manufacturing building in the City of Grand Terrace (“Project”).
After reviewing the Project and the IS/MND and its accompanying documents, SAFER
concludes that there is a fair argument that the Project may have significant environmental
impacts that have not been mitigated, rendering the MND inadequate under the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq.
Accordingly, an environmental impact report (“EIR”) is required.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project would include the development and operation of a 173,000-square foot
assembly and light manufacturing building and associated site improvements on approximately
9.2 acres of land at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road. The two-story building would be
approximately 44-feet in height and would include 18 truck dock doors. As of March 2023, three
buildings occupied the Project site, but were demolished in August 2023. Residences are located
northeast of the Project site.
LEGAL STANDARD
As the California Supreme Court has held “[i]f no EIR has been prepared for a
nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the
project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an
EIR.” (Communities for a Better Env’t v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th
310, 319-320 [citing No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75, 88; Brentwood
H-1
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
December 5, 2023
Comment on IS/MND for Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
City of Grand Terrace
Page 2 of 6
Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491, 504–505].)
“Significant environmental effect” is defined very broadly as “a substantial or potentially
substantial adverse change in the environment.” (Pub. Res. Code § 21068; see also 14 CCR §
15382.)
The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of
Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 (Bakersfield Citizens); Pocket Protectors v. City
of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927. The EIR is an “environmental ‘alarm bell’
whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before
they have reached the ecological points of no return.” Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at
1220. The EIR also functions as a “document of accountability,” intended to “demonstrate to an
apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological
implications of its action.” Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988)
47 Cal.3d 376, 392. The EIR process “protects not only the environment but also informed self-
government.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.
Where an initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment, a mitigated negative declaration may be appropriate. However, a mitigated
negative declaration is proper only if the project revisions would avoid or mitigate the potentially
significant effects identified in the initial study “to a point where clearly no significant effect on
the environment would occur, and…there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record
before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the
environment.” PRC §§ 21064.5 and 21080(c)(2); Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130
Cal.App.4th 322, 331. In that context, “may” means a reasonable possibility of a significant
effect on the environment. PRC §§ 21082.2(a), 21100, 21151(a); Pocket Protectors, 124
Cal.App.4th at 927; League for Protection of Oakland's etc. Historic Res. v. City of Oakland
(1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904–05.
Under the “fair argument” standard, an EIR is required if any substantial evidence in the
record indicates that a project may have an adverse environmental effect—even if contrary
evidence exists to support the agency’s decision. 14 CCR § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors, 124
Cal.App.4th at 931; Stanislaus Audubon Society v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th
144, 150-51; Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th
1597, 1602. The “fair argument” standard creates a “low threshold” favoring environmental
review through an EIR rather than through issuance of negative declarations or notices of
exemption from CEQA. Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928. The “fair argument”
standard is virtually the opposite of the typical deferential standard accorded to agencies. As a
leading CEQA treatise explains:
This ‘fair argument’ standard is very different from the standard normally followed by
public agencies in making administrative determinations. Ordinarily, public agencies
weigh the evidence in the record before them and reach a decision based on a
preponderance of the evidence. [Citations]. The fair argument standard, by contrast,
prevents the lead agency from weighing competing evidence to determine who has a
better argument concerning the likelihood or extent of a potential environmental impact.
H-1
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
December 5, 2023
Comment on IS/MND for Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
City of Grand Terrace
Page 3 of 6
The lead agency’s decision is thus largely legal rather than factual; it does not resolve
conflicts in the evidence but determines only whether substantial evidence exists in the
record to support the prescribed fair argument.
Kostka & Zishcke, Practice Under CEQA, §6.29, pp. 273–74.
The Courts have explained that “it is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument
exists, and the courts owe no deference to the lead agency’s determination. Review is de novo,
with a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review.” Pocket Protectors, 124
Cal.App.4th at 928 (emphasis in original).
DISCUSSION
I. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Describe the Project’s Environmental Setting.
The City inadequately characterized the existing environmental setting and the site’s
ability to provide habitat for rare, special-status species. Every CEQA document must start from
a “baseline” assumption. The CEQA “baseline” is the set of environmental conditions against
which to compare a project’s anticipated impacts. Communities for a Better Envt. v. So. Coast
Air Qual. Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal. 4th 310, 321. Section 15125(a) of the CEQA Guidelines
(14 C.C.R., § 15125(a)) states in pertinent part that a lead agency’s environmental review under
CEQA:
“…must include a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of
the project, as they exist at the time [environmental analysis] is commenced, from both
a local and regional perspective. This environmental setting will normally constitute the
baseline physical conditions by which a Lead Agency determines whether an impact is
significant.” (Emphasis added.)
(See, Save Our Peninsula Committee v. County of Monterey (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 124-
125.) As the court of appeal has explained, “the impacts of the project must be measured against
the ‘real conditions on the ground,’” and not against hypothetical permitted levels. (Save Our
Peninsula, supra, 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 121-123.)
A document’s environmental setting is deemed deficient where it fails to acknowledge
certain habitat that lies adjacent to the Project site. (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Ctr. v
County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 722-30 (“San Joaquin Raptor”) [description of
the environmental setting deficient because it did not disclose the specific location and extent of
riparian habitat adjacent to the property, inadequately investigated the possibility of wetlands on
the site, understated the significance of the project's location adjacent to a river, and failed to
discuss a nearby wildlife preserve].) Courts have repeatedly held that where an environmental
document contains an “inadequate description of the environmental setting for the project, a
proper analysis of project impacts [i]s impossible.” (Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula
Water Management Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1122 [invalidating EIR with only passing
H-2
H-1
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
December 5, 2023
Comment on IS/MND for Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
City of Grand Terrace
Page 4 of 6
references to surrounding viticulture]; Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency
(2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 859, 873-75.)
As applied here, the MND fails to establish disclose the baseline environmental
conditions of the area immediately west of the Project site, and its potential to support special-
status species. Instead, the MND dismisses the usefulness of the area as habitat by labeling it a
“utility easement.” (MND, p. 8.) However, this utility easement is vegetated open land that may
serve as valuable habitat for special-status species, and the Project may impact species in this
adjacent areas. By not accurately describing the environmental setting of the area directly west of
the Project site, the MND failed to analyze any potential impacts to this land or species that may
use it. The MND should be revised to account for this deficiency.
II.The EIR’s Analysis of Energy Conservation Does Not Comply with CEQA or
Appendix “F” of the CEQA Guidelines.
The Project will substantially increase the energy demand and reliance on fossil fuels. At
full buildout, the Project would increase demand for electricity by nearly three trillion British
thermal units and more than 900,000 thousand kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity per year
during operation and natural gas by nearly 4,000,000 thousand (kWh). (MND, p. 48.) Despite
this massive new energy demand, the MND does not conduct a thorough analysis of the Project’s
energy impacts. Instead, it simply asserts that the Project will comply with Title 24 building
codes and CALGreen, and concludes that the Project will therefore not result in wasteful or
inefficient use of energy resources. CEQA requires more.
In pursuit of CEQA’s goals including the long-term protection of the environment, it is
paramount that agencies seriously consider ways to transition to a renewable energy future, as
outlined in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. CEQA requires agencies analyze a project’s
energy conservation impacts. (14 Cal. Code of Regs. (“CCR”), §§ 15126.2(b), Appendix F; Pub.
Res. Code (“PRC”), § 21100(b)(3) (“CEQA Guidelines”).) If the analysis reveals the project may
have a significant environmental effect due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy
resources, “the EIR shall mitigate that energy use.” (Id.) An analysis of a project’s energy use
“should include the project’s energy use for all project phases and components, including
transportation-related energy, during construction and operation. In addition to building code
compliance, other relevant considerations include, among others, the project’s size, location,
orientation, equipment use and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the
project.” (CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.2(b) (emphasis added).) Appendix F of the CEQA
Guidelines provides “guidance” on information to include in an analysis of a project’s energy
use, and impacts and mitigation measures for agencies to consider. (CEQA Guidelines,
Appendix F; CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.2(b).) It explains that “[t]he goal of conserving energy
implies the wise and efficient use of energy,” which is achieved by “(1) decreasing overall per
capita energy consumption, (2) decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and
oil, and (3) increasing reliance on renewable energy resources.” (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix F,
§ I.)
H-3
H-2
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
December 5, 2023
Comment on IS/MND for Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
City of Grand Terrace
Page 5 of 6
CEQA requires more than merely disclosing a project’s anticipated energy use. Rather,
CEQA imposes a responsibility on public agencies to provide a methodical discussion that
reduces fossil fuel reliance, encourages renewable energy use, and reduces per capita energy
consumption.
Here, the MND’s analysis of the Project’s energy impacts does not meet these standards.
Instead, the MND’s section on energy merely discusses the Project’s expected energy
consumption. (MND, pp. 47-48.) Missing from the MND is any analysis of ways the Project
could decrease reliance on fossil fuels, increase reliance on renewables, or decrease per capita
energy consumption. For example, the MND should include a discussion of the feasibility of
putting solar panels on the rooftop, adding electric vehicle chargers, and other ways to meet the
state’s energy goals.
Merely stating that the Project must comply with Title 24 and the 2022 California Green
Building Code (CAL Green) code is not sufficient. (See Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of
Ukiah (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 256, 264-65; California Clean Energy Committee v. City of
Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 209-23. These courts have held that an energy analysis
must go beyond stating compliance with Title 24 and consider other relevant factors listed in
Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines, such as the project’s size, location, equipment use, and
potential renewable energy features. (Id.) The MND failed to do so here.
Similarly, the MND’s attempt to dismiss construction-related energy impacts because any
construction-related energy use “would be substantially less than that required for project
operation and would have a negligible contribution to the project’s overall energy consumption”
(MND, p. 46) does not meaningfully contribute to the analysis. The question is not how much
energy is required during construction compared to the operation. The relevant question is how
the Project can be constructed in a manner that uses energy in a wise and efficient manner by
reducing fossil fuel usage and increasing renewable energy usage. The same question then must
be asked about Project operations.
Finally, the MND’s statement that the Project is “calculated to be comparable to, or less
than, energy consumed by other industrial uses of similar scale and intensity that are constructed
and operating in California” is not sufficient because there is no evidence to support the
statements and because it does not address whether the Project will result in a significant impact.
Without a more robust discussion of the Project’s energy impacts, the MND lacks
substantial evidence to conclude that the Project’s energy impacts will be less-than-significant.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the IS/MND prepared for the Project is inadequate. SAFER
requests that the City prepare an EIR to fully analyze and mitigate the Project’s significant
environmental impacts. Thank you.
H-3
cont.
H-4
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
December 5, 2023
Comment on IS/MND for Assembly and Light Manufacturing Project
City of Grand Terrace
Page 6 of 6
Sincerely,
Marjan R. Abubo
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter H – Lozeau Drury LLP
Response H-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates Lozeau Drury LLP’s participation in the public review process. This comment is
provided on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility, and the commenter requests an EIR to be
prepared. This comment is acknowledged. Since this comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy
of the Draft IS/MND or raise an issue or comment specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental analysis
under CEQA, no further response is warranted. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only
evaluate and respond to comments raised on environmental issues.)
Response H-2
This comment notes that the existing environmental setting, in regard to special status species, has not been accurately
portrayed. This comment is acknowledged. See Master Response #1. Refer to the Draft IS/MND Appendix A, General
Biological Assessment. The General Biological Assessment determined the area immediately west of the project site
is “a disturbed open field”. No special-status plant or wildlife species identified by the California Natural Diversity
Database (CNDDB) were observed during the field survey. The project site is not located within any designated Federal
critical habitat. Further, the project is not required to analyze off-site land.
Response H-3
This comment notes the project will substantially increase the energy demand and reliance on fossil fuels. This
comment is acknowledged. As discussed in the Draft IS/MND, the project would comply with the 2022 Title 24
Standards and CALGreen Code, which require energy efficient and renewable energy features to be incorporated in
the project design. These features include energy efficient appliances, equipment, and heating, ventilation, air
conditioning (HVAC) systems that reduce energy consumption. In addition, the 2022 Title 24 Standards require solar
panels to be installed on non-residential buildings, which increases reliance on renewable energy. The project would
also include electric vehicle (EV) charging stations in compliance with the CALGreen Code, which reduces reliance on
fossil fuels. As such, by complying with the latest Title 24 Standards and CALGreen Code, the project is deemed to
decrease reliance on fossil fuels, increase reliance on renewables, and decrease per capita energy consumption,
ensuring energy use associated with the project operations would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.
Therefore, the energy analysis included in the Draft IS/MND is adequate.
Response H-4
This comment suggests that construction-related energy impacts have not been sufficiently analyzed. This comment
is acknowledged. Construction of the project is expected to last for approximately 14 months, which is short-term and
temporary. Energy consumption during construction would also be short-term and cease once the project is fully
constructed. Construction equipment would be required to comply with the latest engine standards and idling
regulations, which reduce fossil fuel usage. The project would also use electric construction equipment if available, and
because electricity would be generated from more renewable sources in compliance with the State’s Renewable
Portfolio Standards, using electric construction equipment would increase renewable energy usage. As such, the
project is deemed to reduce fossil fuel usage and increase renewable energy usage, ensuring energy use associated
with the project construction would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Therefore, the energy analysis included
in the Draft IS/MND is adequate.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
From: Sahar Ghadimi <sghadimi@aqmd.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:39 PM
To: Scott Hutter <Shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov>
Cc: Sam Wang <swang1@aqmd.gov>
Subject: Comment Letter for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project.
Dear Scott Hutter,
Attached are South Coast AQMD staff’s comments on Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (South
Coast AQMD Control Number: SBC231101-10). Please contact me if you have any questions
regarding these comments.
Regards,
Sahar Ghadimi
Air Quality Specialist, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
South Coast Air Quality Management District
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909) 396-2392
sghadimi@aqmd.gov
Comment Letter I
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
SENT VIA E-MAIL: December 5, 2023
SHutter@grandterrace-ca.gov
Scott Hutter, Development Services Director
City of Grand Terrace
Planning and Development Services Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (Proposed Project)
South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciates the
opportunity to review the above-mentioned document. The City of Grand Terrace is the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. To
provide context, South Coast AQMD staff has provided a brief summary of the project
information and prepared the following comments which are organized by topic of concern.
South Coast AQMD Staff’s Summary of Project Information in the MND
Based on the MND, the Proposed Project consists of constructing a 173,000-square-foot building
for assembly and light manufacturing use on 9.2 acres. Regional access to the project site is
provided via I-215, and local access is provided via Barton Road. Based on a review of aerial
photographs, South Coast AQMD staff found that the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residential
development) is located 115 feet from the Proposed Project site. Construction of the Proposed
Project is anticipated from spring 2024 through summer 2025. The project is located southwest
of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road.
South Coast AQMD Staff’s Comments
User-Defined Land Use Subtype in the California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod) Analysis
In the operational CalEEMod output files, alongside the “Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail”
and “Manufacturing” land use subtypes, a “User-Defined Industrial” subtype is also included.1
According to the CalEEMod User Guide, the “User-Defined” option may be chosen to
characterize project land use subtypes not included in CalEEMod. If selected, all data on the
Land Use screen must be input manually. 2 However, in the Proposed Project’s CalEEMod
output files, the lot acreage and the floor square area use are both set to zero under the “User-
Defined Industrial” land use subtype. Since the truck trips for the “User-Defined Industrial” are
specified as 105 trips/day and no data is filled under this subtype, there is a potential
underestimation of the heavy-duty truck emissions for warehouse activities. Therefore, it is
1 Ibid. Appendix B - Air Quality Impact Analysis. CalEEMod Operational and LST Output Files.
2 California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1 User Guide. Access at:
https://www.caleemod.com/documents/user-guide/CalEEMod_User_Guide_v2022.1.pdf
I-1
I-2
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter December 5, 2023
recommended that the Lead Agency explain why the land use is separated in the CalEEMod
analysis and revise the analysis as necessary in the final CEQA document.
South Coast AQMD Air Permits and Role as a Responsible Agency
If the implementation of the Proposed Project would require the use of new stationary and portable
sources, including but not limited to emergency generators, fire water pumps, boilers, etc., air
permits from South Coast AQMD will be required. The final CEQA document, whether a MND or
EIR, should include a discussion about the potentially applicable rules that the Proposed Project
needs to comply with. Those rules may include, for examples, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct,3 Rule
203 – Permit to Operate,4 Rule 401 – Visible Emissions,5 Rule 402 – Nuisance,6 Rule 403 – Fugitive
Dust,7 Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous and Liquid Fueled Engines,8 Rule 1166 – VOC
Contaminated Soil Excavation,9 Regulation XIII – New Source Review,10 Rule 1401 – Air Toxics,11
Rule 1466 – Control of Particulate Emissions from Soils with Toxic Air Contaminants,12 Rule 1470 –
Requirements for Stationary Diesel Fueled Internal Combustion and Other Compression Ignition
Engines,13, and etc. It is important to note that when air permits from South Coast AQMD are
required, the role of South Coast AQMD would change from a Commenting Agency to a
Responsible Agency under CEQA. In addition, if South Coast AQMD is identified as a Responsible
Agency, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15086, the Lead Agency is required to consult with South
Coast AQMD.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15096 sets forth specific procedures for a Responsible Agency, including
making a decision on the adequacy of the CEQA document for use as part of the process for
conducting a review of the Proposed Project and issuing discretionary approvals. Moreover, it is
important to note that if a Responsible Agency determines that a CEQA document is not adequate to
rely upon for its discretionary approvals, the Responsible Agency must take further actions listed in
CEQA Guideline Section 15096(e), which could have the effect of delaying the implementation of
the Proposed Project. In its role as CEQA Responsible Agency, the South Coast AQMD is obligated
to ensure that the CEQA document prepared for this Proposed Project contains a sufficient project
description and analysis to be relied upon in order to issue any discretionary approvals that may be
needed for air permits.
3 South Coast AQMD Rule 201 – Permit to Construct. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-
ii/rule-201.pdf.
4 South Coast AQMD Rule 203 – Permit to Operate. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-ii/rule-
203.pdf.
5 South Coast AQMD Rule 401 – Visible Emissions. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-
iv/rule-401.pdf.
6 South Coast AQMD Rule 402 – Nuisance. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-
402.pdf.
7 South Coast AQMD Rule 403 – Fugitive Dust. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-
403.pdf.
8 South Coast AQMD Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous and Liquid Fueled Engines. Access at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/rule-1110-2.pdf.
9 South Coast AQMD Rule 1166 - VOC Contaminated Soil Excavation. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/rule-book/reg-xi/rule-1166.pdf.
10 South Coast AQMD Regulation 13 – New Source Review. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-
compliance/rules/scaqmd-rule-book/regulation-xiii.
11 South Coast AQMD Rule 1401 – Air Toxics. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xiv/rule-
1401.pdf.
12 South Coast AQMD Rule 1466 - Control of Particulate Emissions from Soils with Toxic Air Contaminants. Access at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xiv/rule-1466.pdf.
13 South Coast AQMD Rule 1470 - Requirements for Stationary Diesel Fueled Internal Combustion and Other Compression
Ignition Engines. Access at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xiv/rule-1470.pdf.
I-3
I-2
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 76
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Scott Hutter December 5, 2023
For these reasons, the final CEQA document should be revised to include a discussion about any and
all new stationary and portable equipment requiring South Coast AQMD air permits, provide the
evaluation of their air quality and greenhouse gas impacts, and identify South Coast AQMD as a
Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project as this information will be relied upon as the basis for
the permit conditions and emission limits for the air permit(s). Please contact South Coast AQMD’s
Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-3385 for questions regarding what types of equipment
would require air permits. For more general information on permits, please visit South Coast
AQMD’s webpage at http://www.aqmd.gov/home/permits.
Conclusion
The Lead Agency is recommended to revise the CEQA analysis to address the aforementioned
comments and provide the necessary evidence to sufficiently support the conclusions reached. If the
requested information and analysis are not included in the final CEQA document, either the Final
MND or other type of CEQA document, the Lead Agency should provide reasons for not doing so.
Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section
15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for
adoption together with any comments received during the public review process and notify each
public agency when any public hearings are scheduled. Please provide South Coast AQMD with
written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the Final MND. When
responding to issues raised in the comments, detailed reasons supported by substantial evidence in
the record to explain why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted must be provided. In
addition, if the Lead Agency decides to adopt the Final MND, please provide South Coast AQMD
with a notice of any scheduled public hearing(s).
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. South Coast AQMD staff is available to
work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this
comment letter. Please contact Sahar Ghadimi, Air Quality Specialist, at sghadimi@aqmd.gov
should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Sam Wang
Sam Wang
Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
SW:SG
SBC231101-10
Control Number
I-4
I-3
cont.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter I – South Coast Air Quality Management District
(supplemental letter)
Response I-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates SCAQMD’s participation in the public review process. This supplemental
comment letter includes South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) comments on the air quality
analysis of the Draft IS/MND This comment provides a general introduction, appreciating the efforts to include
SCAQMD as part of the project’s CEQA process. This comment is acknowledged.
Response I-2
The commenter notes there may be an underestimation of truck related emissions. The “User-Defined Industrial” land
use subtype was solely used to model heavy-duty truck trips emissions. The other emission sources calculated from
lot acreage and floor square-feet area are included in the “Manufacturing” and “Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail”
land use subtypes. The total floor area modeled for “Manufacturing” (53.6 thousand square feet) and “Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail” (118 thousand square feet) is 171.6 thousand square feet, which is slightly higher than the
project’s total building floor area of 170,152 square feet. Therefore, the modeling is conservative and captured
emissions from all sources for the correct total floor area.
Response I-3
This comment notes if implementation of the project requires the use of new stationary and portable sources, including
but not limited to emergency generators, fire water pumps, boilers, etc., air permits from South Coast AQMD will be
required. The project proposes the development of an assembly and light manufacturing building, which does not
require the use of emergency generators, fire water pumps, boilers, or other heavy-duty equipment that require on-site
combustion. As such, the project is not expected to include new stationary and portable sources that require SCAQMD
air permits. However, if such equipment is deemed necessary after the CEQA review is completed, the project applicant
would apply for air permits from SCAQMD before such equipment is installed and operated.
Response I-4
The comment notes SCAQMD requires written responses to all the aforementioned comments and a notice of any
scheduled public hearing(s). This comment is acknowledged, and no further responses are needed.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 78
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Comment Letter J
J-1
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-5
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter J – City of Colton
Response J-1
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the City of Colton’s participation in the public review process. This comment
provides a general introduction, appreciating the efforts to include the City of Colton as part of the project’s CEQA
process. This comment is acknowledged. Comments provided in the July 13, 2022 letter have been considered and/or
included in the project’s Conditions of Approval.
Response J-2
This comment requests the proposed project to accommodate the Barton Road Bridge removal project timeline. This
comment requests a 10-foot-wide temporary easement during the Barton Road Bridge removal, and requests
contribution to fair share fees related to the removal project. This comment is acknowledged. This comment has been
addressed through inclusion of the following Condition of Approval:
Condition of Approval #154: Depending on the schedule of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction
Project and this development, the applicant is required to construct any interim public street improvements to facilitate
both projects, as applicable.
Response J-3
This comment requests compliance with City of Colton Drainage standards and requirements. This comment is
acknowledged. This comment has been addressed through inclusion of Condition of Approval # 79: All additional
drainage due to development shall be mitigated on-site, no cross-lot drainage will be allowed unless suitable easements
are provided.
Response J-4
The commenter requests to include text in the Final IS/MND mentioning the City of Colton in regards to drainage. This
comment is acknowledged. The suggested text has been incorporated. This clarification has been made to page 9 of
the Draft IS/MND and is reflected below and in Section 3.0, Errata, of the Final IS/MND.
Section 2.3, Project Characteristics, Page 9
• Drainage. The project site is served by a series of storm drains maintained by the City of
Grand Terrace. and the City of Colton.
These changes provide a minor update, correction, or clarification and do not represent “significant new information”
as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 and would not result in any new or substantially greater significant
impacts as compared to those identified in the Draft IS/MND.
Response J-5
The commenter requests to include text in the Final IS/MND mentioning the City of Colton’s required approval for
drainage into the City of Colton’s right-of-way. This comment is acknowledged. The suggested text has been
incorporated. This clarification has been made to page 20 of the Draft IS/MND and is reflected below and in Section
3.0, Errata, of the Final IS/MND.
Section 3.1, Background, Page 20
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
No other public agencies whose approval is required are expected at this time. City of Colton -
for stormwater drainage into City of Colton right-of-way.
These changes provide a minor update, correction, or clarification and do not represent “significant new information”
as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 and would not result in any new or substantially greater significant
impacts as compared to those identified in the Draft IS/MND.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
January 23, 2024
Scott Hutter
Senior Planner
City of Grand Terrace
shutter@grandterrace-ca.gov
Re: Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (SCH NO. 2023100788)
Dear Mr. Hutter:
On behalf of the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance ("GSEJA"), I am writing to you regarding the
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (SCH NO. 2023100788) (the "Project").
GSEJA is withdrawing its comment letter and opposition to the Project. The Project's developer has
addressed GSEJA's concerns about environmental mitigation.
Sincerely,
geoi �
D' ector
K-1
Comment Letter K C.1.a
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Response to Comment Letter K – Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
The City of Grand Terrace appreciates the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA)’s
participation in the public review process. The commenter states they are a representative of GSEJA and
that on behalf of the organization, they retract their previous comment letter (refer to Comment Letter E)
along with their opposition to the Project, since the concerns raised in the original letter have been addressed.
The comment is acknowledged. Since this comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy
of the Draft IS/MND or raise an issue or comment specifically related to the Draft IS/MND’s environmental
analysis under CEQA, no further response is warranted. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a
lead agency only evaluate and respond to comments raised on environmental issues.)
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 1
3.0 ERRATA
Text changes to the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) are noted below. Text that is provided
double underlined indicates additions to the IS/MND; strikethrough indicates deletions to the text. These minor text
revisions/additions are addressed in Section 2.0, Response to Comments, of this Final IS/MND. Text updates are
identified by Draft IS/MND section, as appropriate. Changes are listed by page and, where appropriate, by paragraph.
These errata address the comment letters received on the Draft IS/MND, which was circulated from October 26, 2023
through December 5, 2023. The minor text changes to the Draft IS/MND do not affect the overall conclusions of the
environmental document. These clarifications and modifications are not considered to result in any new or substantially
greater significant impacts as compared to those identified in the Draft IS/MND.
SECTION 2.3, PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
• Drainage. The project site is served by a series of storm drains maintained by the City of Grand Terrace. and
the City of Colton.
SECTION 3.1, BACKGROUND
No other public agencies whose approval is required are expected at this time. City of Colton - for stormwater
drainage into City of Colton right-of-way.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024 Page 1
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that when a public agency completes an environmental
document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt
a reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be
mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation
(Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program,
has been prepared for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (the “project”). This Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (MMRP) is intended to provide verification for the mitigation measures (MM) to ensure they
are monitored, reported, and completed. Monitoring includes: 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been
implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records in the City
of Grand Terrace project file.
This MMRP delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows the City flexibility and discretion in
determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation
measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation
measures were implemented. This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document
disposition, unless otherwise noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Table 1). If an adopted
mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the City and its designated monitoring personnel shall require
corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation.
Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the
following steps:
• The City distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance.
• Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation
measures.
• Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to the City as appropriate.
• Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures.
• Responsible parties shall provide the City with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure,
as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring compliance may be documented
through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review.
• The City prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual report
summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts.
• Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or conditions of
permits/approvals.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024 Page 2
Minor changes to the MMRP, if required, would be made in accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further
review and approval by the City. Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities,
plan redesign to make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation
measures subject to conditions described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. No change will be permitted unless
the MMRP continues to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 3
Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1 Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey.
Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the
California Fish and Game Code, removal of any
trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting
habitat shall be conducted outside the avian
nesting season. If ground disturbing and
vegetation-clearing activities cannot be avoided
during the nesting bird season (February 1
through September 15), a qualified biologist
shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird
survey within all areas of breeding/nesting
habitat within and adjacent to the project site
prior to initiation of project activities that would
remove vegetation or otherwise disturb nesting
activity (for instance, mobilization of heavy
equipment). Surveys shall be conducted not
more than three days prior to initiation of
activities.
If nesting birds are encountered, a qualified
biologist shall establish an avoidance buffer
zone around the nest (buffer zones vary
according to species involved and shall be
determined by the qualified biologist). No
activities that would adversely affect the nest
shall occur within the buffer zone until the
qualified biologist has determined the nest is no
Project
Applicant/Owner;
Qualified Biologist
Prior to ground
disturbance
City Planner Prior to ground
disturbance
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 4
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
longer active and the young are no longer
dependent on the nest.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
CR-1 Qualified Archeologist. In the event that
cultural resources are discovered during initial
ground disturbing activities, all work in the
immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot
buffer) shall cease and a qualified
archaeologist meeting Secretary of the Interior
standards shall be hired by the Project Owner
to assess the find. Work on the other portions
of the project site outside of the buffered area
may continue during this assessment period.
Additionally, the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel
Nation Cultural Resources Department (YSMN)
shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation
Measure TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact
and/or historic-era finds and be provided
information after the archaeologist makes
his/her initial assessment of the nature of the
find, so as to provide Tribal input with regard to
significance and treatment.
Project
Applicant/Owner;
Qualified
Archaeologist
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
City Planner,
and
Yuhaaviatam of
San Manuel
Nation Cultural
Resources
Department
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
CR-2 Cultural Resource Monitoring and Treatment Plan. If during ground disturbing
activities, significant pre- contact and/or
historic-era cultural resources, as defined by
CEQA (as amended 2015), are discovered and
avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist
shall implement a Monitoring and Treatment
Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to
the YSMN for review and comment, as detailed
Project
Applicant/Owner,
Qualified
Archaeologist
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
City Planner,
Qualified
Archaeologist,
and
Yuhaaviatam of
San Manuel
Nation Cultural
Resources
Department
During Ground
Disturbing
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 5
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
in Mitigation Measure TCR-1. The
archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the
project and implement the plan accordingly.
CR-3 Human Remains. If human remains or
funerary objects are encountered during any
activities associated with the project, work in
the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer
of the find) shall cease and the County coroner
shall be contacted pursuant to California Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and that code
enforced for the duration of the project.
Construction
Contractor, City
Inspector
During Project
Construction
City Planner During Project
Construction
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1 Over-Excavation. During grading activities, the
Construction Contractor shall ensure that that
existing soils are over-excavated to a depth of
six (6) feet below existing grade and to a depth
of four (4) feet below the pad grade. The
foundation influence zones shall be over-
excavated to a depth of at four (4) feet below
foundation bearing grade. The over-excavation
shall also extend to a sufficient depth to remove
any artificial fill soils. This measure will require
site verification by the City Inspector, City
Engineer, or its representative.
Project
Applicant/Owner,
Construction
Contractor
During Grading
Activities
City Inspector,
City Engineer, or
its
representative
During Grading
Activities
GEO-2 Paleontological Resources Impact
Mitigation Program. The project applicant
shall prepare a Paleontological Resources
Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) prior to
approval of the grading permit and shall adhere
to the following conditions:
Project
Applicant/Owner,
Qualified
Paleontologist
Prior to
Grading Permit
City Planner or
designee
During
Construction
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 6
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
•All mitigation programs shall be performed by
a qualified professional (project) paleontologist,
defined as an individual with an M.S. or Ph.D.
in paleontology or geology who has proven
experience in San Bernardino County
paleontology and who is knowledgeable in
professional paleontological procedures and
techniques. Fieldwork shall be conducted by a
qualified paleontological monitor, defined as an
individual who has experience in the collection
and salvage of fossil materials. The
paleontological monitor shall always work under
the direction of a qualified paleontologist.
•Monitoring of mass grading and excavation
activities in areas identified as likely to contain
paleontological resources shall be performed
by a qualified paleontologist or paleontological
monitor. Starting at 5 feet below the surface,
monitoring shall be conducted part-time in
areas of grading or excavation in undisturbed
sediments of alluvial fan deposits to look for
potential fossils that might be uncovered or
exposed. The frequency of part-time monitoring
shall be at the discretion of the project
paleontologist, based on the conditions and
geology encountered, as observed by the
monitoring paleontologist. If paleontological
resources are discovered and are determined
to be significant by the project paleontologist,
full-time monitoring shall be implemented.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 7
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Monitoring of disturbed deposits or artificial fill
is not warranted.
•Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to
salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid
construction delays. The monitor shall be
empowered to temporarily halt or divert
equipment to allow removal of abundant or
large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring
may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous
units are not present in the subsurface, or, if
present, are determined on exposure and
examination by qualified paleontological
personnel to have low potential to contain fossil
resources. The monitor shall notify the project
paleontologist, who will then notify the
concerned parties of the discovery.
•Paleontological salvage during trenching and
boring activities is typically from the generated
spoils and does not delay the trenching or
drilling activities. Fossils shall be collected and
placed in cardboard flats or plastic buckets and
identified by field number, collector, and date
collected. Notes shall be taken on the map
location and stratigraphy of the site, which shall
be photographed before it is vacated and the
fossils are removed to a safe place. On mass
grading projects, discovered fossil sites are
protected by flagging to prevent them from
being overrun by earthmovers (scrapers) before
salvage begins. Fossils shall be collected in a
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 8
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
similar manner, with notes and photographs
being taken before removing the fossils.
Precise location of the site is determined with
the use of handheld GPS units. If the site
involves remains from a large terrestrial
vertebrate, such as large bone(s) or a
mammoth tusk, that are too large to be easily
removed by a single monitor, a fossil recovery
crew shall excavate around the find, encase the
find within a plaster and burlap jacket, and
remove it after the plaster is set. For large
fossils, use of the contractor’s construction
equipment may be solicited to help remove the
jacket to a safe location.
•Isolated fossils shall be collected by hand,
wrapped in paper, and placed in temporary
collecting flats or 5-gallon buckets. Notes shall
be taken on the map location and stratigraphy
of the site, which shall be photographed before
it is vacated and the fossils are removed to a
safe place.
•Particularly small invertebrate fossils typically
represent multiple specimens of a limited
number of organisms, and a scientifically
suitable sample can be obtained from one to
several 5-gallon buckets of fossiliferous
sediment. If it is possible to dry screen the
sediment in the field, a concentrated sample
may consist of one or two buckets of material.
For vertebrate fossils, the test is usually the
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 9
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
observed presence of small pieces of bones
within the sediments. If present, multiple 5-
gallon buckets of sediment can be collected
and returned to a separate facility to wet-screen
the sediment.
•In accordance with the “Microfossil Salvage”
section of the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology guidelines, bulk sampling and
screening of fine-grained sedimentary deposits
(including carbonate-rich paleosols) shall be
performed if the deposits are identified to
possess indications of producing fossil
“microvertebrates” to test the feasibility of the
deposit to yield fossil bones and teeth.
•In the laboratory, individual fossils are cleaned
of extraneous matrix, any breaks are repaired,
and the specimen, if needed, is stabilized by
soaking in an archivally approved acrylic
hardener (e.g., a solution of acetone and
Paraloid B-72).
•Recovered specimens shall be prepared to a
point of identification and permanent
preservation (not display), including screen-
washing sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates. Preparation of
individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-
consuming than for accumulations of
invertebrate fossils.
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 10
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
•Identification and curation of specimens into a
professional, accredited public museum
repository with a commitment to archival
conservation and permanent retrievable
storage (e.g., San Bernardino County Museum)
shall be conducted. The paleontological
program shall include a written repository
agreement prior to the initiation of mitigation
activities. Prior to curation, the Lead Agency
(e.g., the City of Grand Terrace) shall be
consulted on the repository/museum to receive
the fossil material.
•A final report of findings and significance shall
be prepared, including lists of all fossils
recovered and necessary maps and graphics to
accurately record their original location(s). The
report, when submitted to and accepted by the
appropriate Lead Agency, shall signify
satisfactory completion of the project program
to mitigate impacts to any potential
nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e.,
fossils) that might have been lost or otherwise
adversely affected without such a program in
place.
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HAZ-1 Soil Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a
grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP)
shall be prepared by a qualified environmental
professional with Phase II/Site Characterization
experience. The SMP shall be made available
to the contractor and the City Engineer for use
Project
Applicant/Owner,
Construction
Contractor /
qualified
environmental
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading
Permit
City Engineer During Grading
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 11
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
during grading activities. The SMP shall include
guidelines for safety measures and soil
management in the event that soils are to be
disturbed, and for handling soil during any
planned earthwork activities. The SMP shall
also include a decision framework and specific
risk management measures for managing soil,
including any soil import/export activities, in a
manner protective of human health and
consistent with applicable regulatory
requirements.
As part of this SMP, all excavation activities
shall be documented daily using digital
photography. In addition, the sides and the
bottom of the excavation areas of concern shall
be appropriately logged on scaled paper.
Observed materials, including an estimate of
the quantity observed, and PID and dust
monitor readings shall be recorded on the Daily
Field Record and/or the Direct Reading Log.
The SMP shall include measures should
evidence of possible USTs be discovered
during grading activities. If during grading
activities evidence of a possible UST is
discovered, the SMP shall require the project
Applicant, or his designee, to contact the San
Bernardino County Environmental Health
Services Division (EHS) for further guidance
and oversight, if deemed necessary by EHS.
professional with
Phase II/Site
Characterization
experience
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 12
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
If the results of the stockpile samples show no
contamination, or detected concentrations of
chemicals within acceptable regulatory limits for
commercial uses, then the soil may be
redistributed within the excavation. If soil is
deemed contaminated, then it shall be
disposed of off-site at an approved landfill
facility. Should any soils be imported or
exported at an off-site location, a Phase II/Site
Characterization Specialist shall verify that all
imported/exported soils are not contaminated
with hazardous materials above regulatory
thresholds. If import/export soils are determined
to be contaminated above regulatory
thresholds, the Phase II/Site Characterization
Specialist would recommend proper handling,
use, and/or disposal of these soils.
HAZ-2 Asbestos and Lead-Containing Materials:
Prior to modification or demolition of existing
structures (including piping materials), the
project Applicant shall complete and submit a
survey of all asbestos containing-materials
(ACMs) and lead-based paints (LBP) to the San
Bernardino County Fire Department (SBCFD)
for review and comment and to the City
Engineer for approval. Should ACMs be
identified, removal shall be performed by a
State-certified asbestos containment contractor
in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403.
Should LBPs be identified, LBPs shall be
Project
Applicant/Owner,
State-Certified
Asbestos
Containment
Contractor
Prior to Site
Modification or
Demolition
Activities
City Engineer;
San Bernardino
County Fire
Department
Prior to Site
Modification or
Demolition
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 13
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
removed and disposed of in accordance with
California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section
1532.1, which specifies exposure limits,
exposure monitoring and respiratory protection,
and mandates good worker practices by
workers exposed to lead. The project Applicant
shall inform the project Engineer, via the
monthly compliance report, of the date when all
ACMs and LBPs are properly removed from the
project site.
HAZ-3 Historical Drinking Water Wells and/or
Septic Tanks: Prior to ground disturbing
activities, the project applicant shall retain a
professional geologist to verify the presence or
absence of an abandoned septic tank and/or
groundwater well at the former residential
structure. In the event either feature is
identified, the former septic tank and/or
groundwater well shall be abandoned and/or
removed in accordance with applicable laws,
ordinances, and regulations. The City of Grand
Terrace Building and Safety Department shall
verify these features have been abandoned
and/or removed prior to ground disturbance
activities.
Should drinking water wells and/or septic tanks
be identified during project construction
activities, the project applicant shall take
appropriate actions in accordance with
applicable regulatory requirements. Such
actions, if warranted, would typically be limited
Project
Applicant/Owner;
Professional
Geologist
Prior to
Ground
Disturbing
Activities
City Building and
Safety
Department or its
designee
Prior to Ground
Disturbing
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 14
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
to the proper abandonment of the water wells
and proper decommissioning of septic tanks.
NOISE
NOI-1 Noise Specifications. Due to the close
proximity to surrounding structures, the Director
of Community Development, or designee, shall
verify, prior to issuance of demolition or grading
permits, that the approved plans require that
the construction contractor shall implement the
following specifications during project
construction activities to ensure that damage
does not occur at surrounding structures:
• If heavy equipment is necessary within 15
feet of existing structures, the following actions
shall be implemented:
o Identify structures that could be
affected by ground-borne vibration and
would be located within 15 feet of
where heavy construction equipment
would be used. This task shall be
conducted by a qualified structural
engineer as approved by the City’s
Director of Community Development
or designee.
o Develop a vibration monitoring and
construction contingency plan for
Project Applicant/
Owner, Construction
Contractor
Prior to
Issuance of
Grading and/or
Demolition
Permits
City Director of
Community
Development or
its designee
During Project
Construction
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 99
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 15
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
approval by the City’s Director of
Community Development, or
designee, to identify structures where
monitoring would be conducted; set up
a vibration monitoring schedule; define
structure-specific vibration limits; and
address the need to conduct photo,
elevation, and crack surveys to
document before and after
construction conditions. Construction
contingencies shall be identified for
when vibration levels approached the
limits.
o At a minimum, vibration shall be
monitored during initial demolition
activities. Monitoring results may
indicate the need for more intensive
measurements if vibration levels
approach the 0.2 PPV (in/sec)
threshold.
o When vibration levels approach the
0.2 PPV (in/sec) limit, construction
shall be suspended and contingencies
shall be implemented as identified in
the approved vibration monitoring and
construction contingency plan to either
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 100
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 16
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
lower vibration levels or secure the
affected structures.
TRANSPORTATION
TRA-1 Commute Trip Reduction Program. Prior to
occupancy, the tenant shall implement a
mandatory Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)
program to encourage employees to carpool,
take transit, and walk and bike to work.
Calculations assume that 100 percent of
employees are eligible. The CTR program shall
include the following elements:
1. Transit subsidies (effectiveness is
calculated based on the ratio of
transit subsidy to total cost of
transit; therefore, the subsidy
should cover most if not all of the
cost of riding mass transit).
2. Incentives for walking and
bicycling to work. This could
include a daily cash incentive or
other incentive such as ability to
earn credit towards prizes or gift
cards. It should be noted that few
pedestrian or bicycle facilities
exist within the project site, and
Building Tenant Prior to
Occupancy
City Planner Prior to
Occupancy
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 17
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
likely this option would be utilized
by a low number of employees.
3. Incentives for carpooling or
vanpooling, such as priority
parking spaces and/or a daily or
monthly stipend for participants.
Additional incentives for carpool
and/or vanpool drivers could also
be provided.
4. Preferred parking for carpool or
vanpool vehicles.
5. Guaranteed ride home program to
ensure employees who commute
by public transportation, carpool,
or vanpool can return home if
needed. This could be
implemented through an on-site
carshare program or subsidies for
taxi or Uber/Lyft services.
6. An on-site CTR marketing
strategy that includes information
sharing and marketing to promote
and educate employees about
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 18
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
their travel choices to the
employment location. This
measure would require an on-site
employee transportation
coordinator and commuter
information services, and on- site
or online transit pass sales.
To comply with components 2, 3, 5, and 6 of
Mitigation Measure TRA-1, tenants of the
facility could participate in the IE Commuter
program (iecommuter.org). IE Commuter is a
program of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) and the San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). The
IE Commuter program includes rideshare
matching, reimbursed guaranteed ride home,
commuter incentives for participation, and
vanpool subsidies. IE Commuter also provides
a website for employee participants to track
their participation and reporting tools for
employers. The program and reporting tools
comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202, which
applies to employers over 500 employees.
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
TCR-1 Notification. The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel
Nation Cultural Resources Department (San
Manual Tribe or YSMN) shall be contacted
regarding pre-contact and/or historic-era
cultural resources discovered during project
implementation and be provided information
regarding the nature of the find, so as to
City Planner During Project
Implementatio
n
City Planner, and
Yuhaaviatam of
San Manuel
Nation Cultural
Resources
Department
During Project
Implementation
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
City of Grand Terrace
Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
February 2024
Page 19
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure Implementation
Responsibility Timing Monitoring
Responsibility Timing Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
provide tribal input with regard to significance
and treatment. Should the find be deemed
significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended
2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and
Treatment Plan shall be created by the
archaeologist, in coordination with the YSMN,
and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this
plan. This plan shall allow for a monitor to be
present that represents the YSMN for the
remainder of the project, should the YSMN
elect to place a monitor on-site.
TCR- 2 Any and all archaeological/cultural documents
created as a part of the project (isolate records,
site records, survey reports, testing reports,
etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and
Lead Agency for dissemination to the San
Manuel Tribe. The Lead Agency and/or
applicant shall, in good faith, consult with
YSMN throughout the life of the project.
City Planner, and
Project Applicant
During Project
Activities
City Planner During Project
Activities
C.1.a
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
a
l
I
S
.
M
N
D
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
_
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
4
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
Page 1 | 11
City of Grand Terrace - Planning and Development Services Department
Conditions of Approval
Conditions of Approval for the Assembly and Light Manufacturing Building Project (CUP 22- 02), Site and
Architectural Review (SA 22-08), and Environmental (E 22-06), located at 21801/21823 Barton Road:
Project Description
1. This Project is approved to establish an approximately 170,152 square foot assembly and light manufacturing building
on 9.2-acres, with 4,800 square feet of office space, 115,026 square feet of assembly storage and 50,326 square
feet of assembly space, 18 dock doors, and 240 auto parking spaces. The Project includes significant landscaping
roughly about 25-feet along Barton Road to enhance frontage. The parking lot areas located northeast, and northwest
include trees and shrubs. The Project will include a retaining wall that measures 6-feet tall with tubular steel fence
on top along the west side of the property line. The east side of the property will be fenced with a 6-foot fence with
artificial green vines and decorative pilasters. The south side of the property will be fenced with an 8-feet high tubular
steel fence. All utilities such as electricity, sewer, and water will be connecting to existing facilities will be required to
be underground. The Project site will be accessed via one driveway along Barton Road. The northwest driveway is
roughly 70-feet and will be the primary truck and passenger car access point. A second driveway is included for
emergency vehicle access only. Internal circulation will be via 30 feet drive aisles. The Project provides a total of
two hundred forty-four (244) total parking spaces, which are comprised of two hundred thirty-seven (237) standard
stalls, five (5) standard ADA accessible stalls, and two (2) ADA van accessible stalls. Forty-nine (49) of the parking
stalls will be EV capable. The site improvements include, but are not limited to, demolition and removal of existing
concrete pads and asphalt paved areas, construction of perimeter wall and fencing, landscaping, parking, trash
enclosure, lighting, security features, and construction of ultimate street improvements at the project’s frontage
(Barton Road). Approximately 175 persons would be employed on site, with one or more shift periods. Twenty-four
(24) hours/seven days per week activity will be allowed exclusively in the interior of the building. Deliveries to and
from the site and loading and unloading operations will be prohibited from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Construction
activities for the Project would occur over one phase and include demolition, site preparation, grading, building
construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Demolition will take less than one month to complete as the western
portion of the site has already been demoed. Building construction will take ten months. Paving will take two months
and Landscape will take four months. An initial study/mitigated negative declaration has been prepared for this
proposal. The application materials are approved as submitted and conditioned herein and shall not be further altered
except as modified by these conditions of approval and mitigation measures, and unless reviewed and approved by
the affected departments.
General Conditions
2. If not appealed, this approval shall become effective on the eleventh (11th) day after the date of the Planning
Commission’s approval; or the next city business day following such eleventh (11th) day when the eleventh (11th)
day is not a city business day. This approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of adoption of this
Resolution unless building permits have been issued and a substantial investment in reliance of those permits has
occurred; all conditions of approval have been met; or a time extension has been granted by the Planning and
Development Services Director, in accordance with Chapter 18.83, and Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code. Time
extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Director may, upon
application by the Applicant, extend the compliance period for a up to one year. No approval shall be extended by
the Planning Director to a date beyond two years from the date of the initial approval.
3. Minor modifications to this approval which are determined by the Planning and Development Services Director to be
in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, and which do not intensify or change the use or require any
deviations from adopted standards, may be approved by the Planning and Development Services Director upon
submittal of the required application(s) and the required fee(s) consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
4. Operational and construction activities associated with the Project shall comply with the regulations of the City’s
Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.108 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
5. Applicant shall work with the City’s franchised solid waste hauler, Burrtec, to follow a debris management plan to
divert the material from landfills by the use of separate recycling bins (e.g., wood, concrete, steel, aggregate, glass)
during demolition and construction to minimize waste and promote recycle and reuse of the materials.
6. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in Burrtec dumpsters pursuant to City Codes and removed from the premises
on an as needed basis. At the end of each day of construction activity, all construction debris and waste materials
shall be collected and properly disposed of in trash or recycle bins. General Contractor shall sweep the Project site
at the end of the day during construction.
7. Approved hours of operation: Twenty-four (24) hours/seven days per week operation activity will be allowed
exclusively in the interior of the building and deliveries to and from the site and loading and unloading operations will
be prohibited from 11:00p.m. to 6:00 a.m. as identified on the table below.
Hours of Operation
Permitted Prohibited
Inside building operations 24 hours/7 days per week ---
Outside building operations 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 2 | 11
8. Exterior speakers are prohibited.
9. Outdoor storage, including but not limited to non-material handling equipment, materials, and staging of materials
shall be prohibited. Materials and non-material handling equipment shall be kept in the interior of the building
overnight. Outdoor storage of material handling equipment such as forklifts and yard goats shall be restricted to the
18 loading dock parking spaces.
10. Parking of semi-trailers, semi-trailer trucks, shipment containers outside the designated eighteen (18) truck bays is
prohibited. No more than 18 semi-trailers shall be stored onsite overnight at any given time without City Council
approval. No construction or modifications that increase the number of loading docks shall be approved without City
Council approval.
11. No indoor furniture, materials, and or non-material handling equipment shall be allowed outdoors. All exterior
walkways shall be kept clear for handicapped accessibility.
12. A building permit shall be obtained for any tenant improvement construction, remodel, renovation, or expansion.
13. Revisions or modifications requested by the Applicant, including but not limited to changes to these conditions,
expansions, land use intensity, or hours of operation, shall be processed in the same manner as the original approval
consistent with Municipal Code Chapter 18.83 and Chapter 18.63.
14. The Planning Commission may periodically review any conditional use permit to ensure that it is being operated in a
manner consistent with conditions of approval or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. If, after review, the commission deems that there is
sufficient evidence to warrant full examination, then a public hearing date shall be set. At such public hearing, the
Planning Commission may modify or revoke the permit pursuant to Section 18.83.080.
15. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof,
and officers, officials, employees, or agents thereof, from any and all claims, actions, suits, proceedings, or judgments
against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, and any officers, officials, employees, or agents thereof to
attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency,
appeal board, or legislative body, including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Project and
the approvals granted herein. Furthermore, the Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, against any and all claims, actions, suits, proceedings, or judgments
against another governmental entity in which the Applicant’s Project is subject to that other governmental entity's
approval and a condition of such approval is that the City indemnify and defend such governmental entity.
16. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim or action
and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the city, their affiliate’s officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against
the City of Grand Terrace. The Applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys’ fees, which
the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve Applicant
of his or her obligation under this condition.
17. Upon approval of these conditions by the Planning Commission and prior to becoming final and binding, the Applicant
must sign and return an “Acceptance of Conditions” form. The form and content shall be prepared by the Planning
and Development Services Department.
18. In the event that exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail.
19. The Applicant shall comply with all laws, including but not limited to all Federal, State, County and Local laws, at all
times.
20. The Applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the site.
21. Any future development on the site, including alterations, conversions, remodels, and new structures shall require
compliance with the Municipal Code.
22. Any future changes in on-site activities shall require submittal, review, and approval of a modified conditional use
permit.
23. A copy of the accepted Conditions of Approval shall be placed on the final construction plans. Final construction
plans shall be placed at the job site until receipt of final Certificate of Occupancy. The Applicant/Developer shall be
fully responsible for knowing and complying with all Conditions of Approval.
24. The Applicant shall implement SCAQMD Rule 403 and standard construction practices during all operations capable
of generating fugitive dust, which will include but not be limited to the use of best available control measures and
reasonably available control measures such as:
a. Water active grading areas and staging areas at least twice daily as needed;
b. Ensure that all disturbed areas are treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon.
c. Ensure that landscaped areas are installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion.
d. Suspend grading activities when wind gusts exceed 25 mph;
e. Sweep public paved roads if visible soil material is carried off-site;
f. Enforce on-site speed limits on unpaved surface to 15 mph; and
g. Discontinue construction activities during Stage 1 smog episodes.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 3 | 11
25. The Applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the site, including parking lot
paving condition and striping, clearing of trash, weeds and debris, lighting, and other site improvements. All parking
facilities shall be maintained in good condition, no cracks, no potholes, no fading parking stripping. The maintenance
thereof may include but shall not be limited to the repaving, sealing, and striping of a parking area and the repair,
restoration and/or replacement of any parking area design features when deemed necessary by the City to insure
the health, safety, and welfare of the general public.
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP)
26. The Applicant shall implement the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Report Program (MMRP) that is attached and part
of these Conditions of Approval and shall comply with all mitigations listed in the program including but not limited to
measures to reduce or offset potential environmental impacts to: biological resources, cultural resources, geology
and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The Applicant shall
contract with various licensed, specialized professionals as described in the MMRP in order to certify that the MMRP
has been implemented; further, the Applicant shall bear the cost of their consultation services. The Applicant shall
provide a letter or copy of each agreement with the licensed, specialized professionals to the City of Grand Terrace
Planning Department prior to the start of said mitigation measure(s) stating that the licensed, specialized
professionals have been retained to provide services for the Project as stated in the adopted MMRP.
Landscaping
26. During the first Plan Check submittal, the Applicant shall submit three sets of final landscape plan(s) and a digital
copy prepared by a state licensed Landscape Architect, subject to the approval of the Community Development
Department, and Public Works Department for and required landscaping in the public right-of-way. Landscape plans
for any Landscape Maintenance District shall be on separate plans. An initial $2,000 Irrigation and landscape deposit
shall be included with the submittal for review and inspection by the city’s consulting engineering.
27. The final landscape plans shall conform to the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Chapter 15.56)
Landscaping Standards contained in Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code and in compliance with the most recent
version of the State Model Ordinance.
28. Final landscape and irrigation plans shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual landscape
plan and the conditions of approval including areas of public right-of-way. All fencing or walls shall be illustrated on
the final landscape plan.
29. Applicant shall maintain the property and landscaping in a clean without weeds and debris and all dead and dying
plants shall be replaced.
30. For the lifetime of this Project, Applicant must replace all dead or missing plants and trees as to comply with the
approved landscape plan. The replacement plants and trees shall be similar or equivalent type, size, and height of
the specimen being replaced as originally planted pursuant to the approved Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The
plant material replacement shall be installed within 30 days of being notified by city staff.
31. Landscape plans shall depict the utility laterals, concrete improvements, and tree locations. Any modifications to the
landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works and Community Development Departments
prior to issuance of permits.
32. Improvement plans shall include all connections and locations to the City mains for on-site irrigation, including all
meter and backflow prevention devices.
33. All irrigation shall be “purple pipe” at the property, and when reclaimed water infrastructure becomes available to the
Project, the Property Owner shall disconnect irrigation from potable source and connect to reclaimed water source
resulting in a non-potable irrigation system for the Project.
34. Applicant must install root barriers, adjacent to back side of sidewalk, when planting on-site tree(s) within 10 feet
from the public right-of-way and public sidewalk.
35. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the landscape inspection shall be approved by city staff. The final
landscape inspection shall be requested by the Applicant a week prior to the desired inspection date.
36. The landscaping plans shall include dimensions and show location of fire hydrants and parking lighting.
37. The perimeter fencing to the east shall include a 6-foot fence with artificial (Grasstik or an equal product approved
by the City) green vines and decorative pilasters.
Prior to Grading
38. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit a photometric plan and final lighting plan to City staff
showing the exact locations of light poles and the orientation and shielding of all light fixtures to prevent glare onto
existing and potential future development surrounding the Project Site.
39. Lighting shall remain on during nighttime hours of operations and security cameras shall be installed.
40. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply
with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction
Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 4 | 11
copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the
NPDES General Construction Permit.
41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Applicant must submit improvement plans on minimum 24" x 36" sheets having
the City's standard signature blocks. All plans must be drawn in ink and must be signed by a California State
Registered Civil Engineer at the time of first submittal. Applicant must submit improvement plans for the entire Project
as one package and must include all Project improvements shown on the approved Project exhibits and those to be
designed per these Conditions. Piecemeal submittal of plans is not acceptable. Plans and studies must be signed by
a California State Registered Civil Engineer at the time of first submittal. This package must include all supporting
studies.
42. Under no condition shall there be stockpiling of material prior to the issuance of the first grading permit and related
condition of approval for the grading permit have been obtained.
43. The Applicant shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
44. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain clearances, including but not limited to license
agreements, quitclaims, or other applicable documentation for all easements traversing the Project site. A copy of
the easement clearances shall be provided to the City Engineer for review. Easements (as shown on the Easement
Exhibit attached hereto) and their corresponding method of clearance are detailed below:
Label
Type Easement
Holder
Recording
Date
Recording
No.
Title Report &
Exc. No.
Method of Clearance
A Electrical
Southern Sierras
Power Company
4/22/1912 Book 503
Page 292 of
Deed
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 3
Quitclaim
B Electrical /
Communication
Southern
California Edison
Company
4/4/1961 Book 5394
Page 506 of
Official
Records
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 6
Quitclaim
C Sewers
County Services
Area 70,
Improvement
Zone, H
4/2/1975 Book 8648
Page 441 of
Official
Records
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 9
Email from City of
Colton approving
sewer plan (easement
to remain)
F Fiber Optic /
Communication
AT&T, as
successor to
Union Pacific
Railroad
Company
6/1/2007
and
9/2/2021
2021-0401054
and 2007-
0329371, of
Official
Records
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 10
& 11
Email from AT&T
approving storm drain
plan (easement to
remain)
G Electrical /
Communication
Southern Sierras
Power Company
4/17/1914 Book 547 of
Deeds, Page
360
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 4
Quitclaim
J Public Highway
County of San
Bernardino
5/25/1920 Book 685,
Page 356, of
Deeds
01910638-919-
EGL-EGL, Exc. 5
Dedication in fee to the
City
45. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the ministerial review and approval of Lot Merger 22-02 to join APNs 1167-
121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-07; 1167-131-011; and a portion of 1167-121-08, shall be recorded
and accepted by San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office. The City Engineer shall review and approve the final
documents prior to recordation. The City Clerk Division shall record the Lot Merger, the review and recording fees
shall be borne by the Project Applicant.
46. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a bond or legal document to be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director for the future completion of the ultimate street improvements at
Barton Road. The street improvements shall be consistent with the City of Colton bridge improvements, including but
not limited to:
a. The Applicant shall provide the required right-of-way dedication to construct the ultimate Barton Road right-
of-way. The dedication documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Engineer prior to
recordation. The review and recording fee shall be borne by the Applicant.
b. The Applicant shall construct interim public street improvements to facilitate the Barton Bridge Removal
Project.
c. The Applicant shall replant Projects required front landscaping setback and parkway landscape affected
during the bridge improvements.
Prior to Construction
47. Upon Planning Commission approval, Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of professionally prepared plans to the
Building and Safety Division’s Plan Check process. Plans must comply with the adopted California Building and Fire
Code at the time of submittal. Two copies will be for Building, one for Fire, one for Public Works.
48. Along with those sets, the Applicant shall also submit two sets of structural calculations and two sets of Title 24.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 5 | 11
49. Any studies required within these conditions require a deposit to cover the cost of the review of the studies. Additional
deposits may be required, or a refund issued when the costs do not match the deposits.
50. Pay appropriate fees for plan check, inspection, and microfilming and storage of maps and plans, and any other
required fees.
51. Per the City Engineer, provide adequate corner sight distance per Caltrans standards at entry to site (main driveway)
and submit verification of same to the Public Works Department as required in conjunction with plan checking of the
street improvement plans. For clarity, emergency vehicle driveway shall not require sight distance per Caltrans
standards.
52. Applicant must provide utilities and design improvements such that all existing and new distribution utilities except
for electrical lines of 33 KVA or more are underground and meeting city specifications, including location, distance,
and separation requirements, and away from driveways and trees. For clarity, the City has approved the overhead
transmission relocation Project (SCE Project ID # 2755).
53. Prior to issuance of building permits for the perimeter decorative block walls/fences on shared property lines, the
Applicant shall submit a Fence/Wall Agreement signed by the adjacent property owners authorizing construction of
the wall/fence on the shared property line. In the absence of a Fence/Wall agreement, the construction plans shall
demonstrate the perimeter decorative block walls/fences to be constructed entirely inside the Project’s property line.
The fence shall be constructed consistent with the approved site plan, including decorative pilasters and privacy
hedges.
54. Public utility easements shall be dedicated to cover all utilities either by map or separate document.
55. The precise grading plan with hydrology study, hydraulic calculations, and soils report for the Project shall be
approved by the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of any building permits.
56. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes.
57. The Applicant shall ensure that all construction contractors and subcontractor personnel are made aware of the
required best management practices and good housekeeping measures for the Project construction site and any
associated construction lay-down areas. Any surplus construction materials shall be stored so as to be screened
from public view when not in use and be removed from the property upon completion of construction activities.
58. All parking spaces, loading areas, and drive aisles shall comply with the standards established in the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code.
59. Construct any and all City required street improvements (including, but not limited to curb and gutter, asphalt concrete
pavement, aggregate base, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, and streetlights) on all interior streets.
60. Applicant shall comply with the prevailing City standards and requirements at the time of construction.
61. Any abandoned wells on the property or similar structures shall be destroyed in a manner approved by the Public
Works Department in accordance with the State of California Department of Health Services or other appropriate
oversight agency.
62. Applicant shall pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities, as necessary.
63. The Applicant shall design public improvements including sidewalk, drive approaches and handicap ramps in
accordance with all requirements of the State of California Accessibility Standards, Title 24 California Administrative
Code.
64. Applicant must install and maintain any and all City required street trees, parkway landscaping, and irrigation system
within the development during construction phase. Once installed, the property owner must maintain this
improvement in perpetuity.
65. Applicant shall require that all construction equipment is properly maintained with operating mufflers and air intake
silencers and prioritizes the location of equipment staging and storage as far as practical from the existing residential
unit south of the site, respectively.
66. All necessary precautions and preventive measures shall be in place in order to prevent material from being washed
away by surface waters or blown by wind. These controls shall include at a minimum: regular wetting of surface or
other similar wind control method, installation of straw or fiber mats to prevent rain related erosion. Detention basin(s)
or other appropriately sized barrier to surface flow must be installed at the discharge point(s) of drainage from the
site. Any water collected from these controls shall be appropriately disposed of at a disposal site. These measures
shall be added as general notes on the site plan and a statement added that the operator is responsible for ensuring
that these measures continue to be effective during the duration of the Project construction.
67. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code in effect at
the time of approval, and includes development standards and requirements relating to: dust and dirt control during
construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare
control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-
street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the
developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until compliance is met. Any exterior
structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts, or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall
or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 6 | 11
68. During construction of the site, the Project shall comply with Grand Terrace Municipal Code Section 8.108.040
(Special Activities) which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Monday through
Saturday, and no construction activity shall take place at any time on Sunday or national holydays. No heavy
construction occurring on weekends or national holidays.
69. The Applicant shall work with the City’s franchised solid waste hauler to follow a debris management plan to divert
the material from landfills by the use of separate recycling bins (e.g., wood, concrete, steel, aggregate, glass) during
demolition and construction to minimize waste and promote recycle and reuse of the materials.
70. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department
proof of payment or waiver from both the City of San Bernardino for sewer capacity fees and Colton Unified School
District for school impact fees.
71. All Development Impact fees shall be paid to the City of Grand Terrace prior to the issuance of any building permits.
72. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall comply with Burrtec’s requirements per AB 2766 and
Burrtec’s Conditions of Approval included in the Memorandum dated, November 18, 2022, attached hereto as Exhibit
4.
Prior to Occupancy
73. Prior to occupancy Applicant must complete all improvements per the accepted plans and approved conditions and
obtain acceptance for the improvements from the City.
74. Prior to requesting a final inspection for release of securities, Applicant must submit record drawings, certifications,
final soils report, and a digital file of record drawings to the City.
75. Any "Record Revisions" or “As-Builts” shall be made to all plans to reflect the changes to the improvements as
constructed.
76. Comply with all state law regarding waste management and the City’s Integrated Waste Management Ordinance.
77. Install any and all required street name signs and traffic control signs with locations and types approved by the Public
Works Department.
78. To the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the streetlights shall be installed and energized prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy by the Building and Safety Division. The make and model of the streetlights needs to be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to installation. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement, given
that the streetlights are part of an independent project, the Applicant will be permitted to obtain a temporary certificate
of occupancy to allow for full operation of the project while completing the necessary work to install and energize the
streetlights.
79. All additional drainage due to development shall be mitigated on-site, no cross-lot drainage will be allowed unless
suitable easements are provided.
80. Any damage to existing improvements as a result of this Project shall be repaired by the Applicant to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
81. The Applicant shall screen all mechanical equipment including the HVAC units from public view.
82. All infrastructural “tagging” denoting the presence of some subterranean infrastructure or encode instruction for
construction or maintenance workers that is associated with this Project shall be removed by the Applicant prior to
issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.
83. The Applicant shall screen all ground mounted equipment, including backflow devices, in a manner that does not
impede traffic visibility. Screening is in addition to required backflow protection cages/enclosures that shall be
required for all backflow preventer valves, irrigation valves, bypass meter assemblies and similar devices associated
with the development.
84. Signs are not approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new signs, the Applicant shall submit an
application, and receive approval, for a sign permit from the Planning Division (pursuant to Chapter 18.80 of the
Grand Terrace Municipal Code) and a building permit for construction of the signs from the Building Division, as
applicable.
85. The Applicant shall submit final grade certifications, by the grading engineer, to the Public Works Department prior
to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.
86. Prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy of the building, Applicant must have completed installation of
any and all public right-of-way improvements as shown on the City approved improvement plans.
87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the future tenant shall comply with Local, State, and Federal
requirements, and obtain a City’s Business License from the Finance Department prior to initiating business
operations. The business license shall be renewed annually, at the beginning of each calendar year, during the month
of January, for as long as the business in operation.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 7 | 11
88. Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted separately to be reviewed and approved by Building and Safety
Division.
89. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and concurrent with the business license application, any tenant
that will be leasing the facility shall coordinate with the San Bernardino’s Sheriff’s department and submit a security
plan to the City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department. Any revisions to the security plan
by either the property owner or tenant must go through the County of San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department for
approval of the revisions then submitted to the City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services
Department.
90. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any tenant leasing the facility shall submit an operations plan of
their business operations. The operations shall in no way deviate from the approved use and shall abide by the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code. The operations plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department within 30 days of the
draft operations plan submittal. Approval or comments/corrections shall be provided back to the applicant within the
30-day review deadline. Upon second submittal, the City shall review comments/corrections within 15 days and
issue approval of the business operations, provided the business operations are consistent with the conditions of
approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program.
91. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any tenant that will be leasing the facility shall set up waste
services with Burrtec and comply with the required trash collection services as required by Burrtec.
Fire Department
92. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Department,
permit number FPLN-2022-00215, attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
93. The development shall have a minimum of two points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment
access and for evacuation routes. a. Single Story Road Access Width. All buildings shall have access provided by
approved roads, alleys, and private drives with a minimum twenty-six (26) foot unobstructed width and vertically to
fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider
access provisions. b. Multi-Story Road Access Width. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a
minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height.
94. Roadways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department. These shall
be extended to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior
walls of the first story of any building.
95. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval.
96. Commercial and industrial developments in excess of 100,000 sq. ft. shall have the street address installed on the
building with numbers that are a minimum twelve (12) inches in height and with a one and one half (1 ½) inch stroke.
The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically
illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional
non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.
97. An automatic fire sprinkler monitoring fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA and all codes
is required. The Applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire alarm contractor. The fire alarm contractor shall
submit detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of
plan submittal.
98. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire
Department.
99. The required fire fees shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division.
100. The Applicant is required to produce a current flow test report from your water purveyor demonstrating that the fire
flow demand is satisfied. This requirement shall be completed prior to combination inspection by Building and Safety.
101. The Applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be
painted red. The "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs shall be installed on public/private roads in accordance with the
approved plan.
102. An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Pamphlet #13 and the Fire Department standards is
required. The Applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire sprinkler contractor. The fire sprinkler contractor
shall submit plans to the with hydraulic calculation and manufacturers specification sheets to the Fire Department for
approval and approval. The contractor shall submit plans showing type of storage and use with the applicable
protection system. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.
103. The Applicant shall contact the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Hazardous Materials Division (909) 386-
8401 for review and approval of building plans, where the planned use of such buildings will or may use hazardous
materials or generate hazardous waste materials.
104. The Applicant shall submit an application for all high-piled storage (internal storage over 12’ in height), detailed plans
and a commodity analysis report to the Fire Department for review and approval. The Applicant shall submit the
approved plan to Building and Safety for review with building plans. If the occupancy classification is designated as
S-2, commodities to be stored will be limited to products of light hazard classification only. The required fees shall be
paid at the time of plan submittal.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 8 | 11
105. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire
Department.
106. Permission to occupy or use the building (certificate of Occupancy or shell release) will not be granted until the Fire
Department inspects, approves, and signs off on the Building and Safety job card for “fire final.”
107. The above referenced Project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein “Fire
Department.” Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the Applicant shall contact the Fire Department for
verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current California Fire
Code requirements and all codes, ordinances, and standards of the Fire Department.
108. An approved Fire Department key box is required. In commercial, industrial, and multi-family complexes, all swing
gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.
109. The Applicant shall install Fire Department approved material identification placards on the outside of all buildings
and/or storage tanks that store or plan to store hazardous or flammable materials in all locations deemed appropriate
by the Fire Department. Additional placards shall be required inside the buildings when chemicals are segregated
into separate areas. Any business with an N.F.P.A. 704 rating of 2-3-3 or above shall be required to install an
approved key box vault on the premises, which shall contain business access keys and a business plan.
110. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department override switch (Knox ®) is required.
111. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the primary access road shall be paved or an all-weather
surface and shall be installed as specified in the General Requirement conditions, including width, vertical clearance,
and turnouts.
112. A letter from a licensed structural (or truss) engineer shall be submitted with an original wet stamp at time of fire
sprinkler plan review, verifying the roof is capable of accepting the point loads imposed on the building by the fire
sprinkler system design.
113. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the secondary access road shall be paved or an all-
weather surface and shall be installed as specified in the General Requirement conditions including width, vertical
clearance, and turnouts.
114. Mechanical smoke removal systems shall be provided for building protected by EFSR sprinkler systems as required
by the Chief. The mechanical smoke removal systems shall meet the requirements of CFC and SBCOFD Standards.
115. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and
shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Road surface shall meet the approval of the Fire
Chief prior to installation. All roads shall be designed to 85% compaction and/or paving and hold the weight of Fire
Apparatus at a minimum of 80K pounds.
116. Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development
and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using California Fire
Code. The Fire Flow for this Project shall be: 3750 GPM for a 3-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure.
Fire Flow is based on a 168,191 sq. ft. structure.
117. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be operational, prior
to any combustibles being stored on the site. The Applicant is required to provide a minimum of one new six (6) inch
fire hydrant assembly with one (1) two and one half (2 1/2) inch and two (2) four (4) inch outlet. All fire hydrants shall
be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart (as measured along vehicular travel-ways) and no more than
one hundred fifty (150) feet from any portion of a structure.
Public Works
118. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Public Works Division, including the
Conditions of Approval contained in the Public Works Memorandum dated August 28, 2023, attached hereto as
Exhibit 2.
119. All work shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction
(Green Book), County of San Bernardino Standards, and City of Grand Terrace Standards.
120. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City standards and requirements of the
serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV.
121. Improvements at Barton Road will require coordination with and review/approval by the City of Grand Terrace in
coordination with the City of Colton Bridge Improvement Project.
122. Public sewer improvement plans shall be submitted to the City of Colton Wastewater Department and Public Works
for plan review and approval.
123. Public water improvements plans shall be submitted to Riverside Highland Water Company for review and approval.
124. Water improvement plans for fire hydrants shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department for
plan review and approval.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 9 | 11
125. All distribution lines shall be undergrounded, if not already, within the parcel and along the Project frontage. For
clarity, the overhead transmission relocation Project (SCE Project ID # 2755) shall not be undergrounded.
126. All improvements occurring within and impacting the City of Riverside owned parcel crossing the site shall be
coordinated with the City of Riverside. The necessary license agreement over said parcel shall be secured prior to
final engineering plan approvals. The license area shall be plotted and identified on the submitted plans.
127. Pavement restoration and trench repair for any street cuts shall be in conformance with San Bernardino County
standards or as approved by the City Engineer.
128. Onsite improvements shall comply with the requirements of the California Building Code, Title 24.
129. The developer shall restore any public improvements damaged during construction.
130. A drainage study will be required for the Project in accordance with the San Bernardino County hydrology manual.
Any drainage improvements needed to mitigate the increase in runoff (for the 100-year storm event), mitigate
downstream impacts, and/or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer’s expense.
131. Concentrated drainage directed to the public street shall not be conveyed across the sidewalk or driveway
approaches, but rather through parkway culverts/under sidewalk drains in accordance with San Bernardino County
standards, SPPWC standards or as approved by the City Engineer.
132. If the grading plan indicates export or import, the site of the import or the site for the deposition of the export shall be
noted on the grading plan. Permit/s may be required for the source or destination site of the material.
133. A final WQMP submittal will be required during final engineering stage. All infiltration treatment BMPs shall require
site specific infiltration testing shall be conducted to substantiate the design infiltration rate used in the WQMP
calculations in accordance with the San Bernardino Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management
Plans – Appendix D (Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol).
134. This Project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES). Verification of
coverage under the State Construction General Permit (CGP) will be required before a grading permit will be issued
by providing a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and printing the WDID # on the Onsite
Grading Plan.
135. All pavement sections (onsite and offsite) shall be substantiated with pavement section recommendations (based on
the appropriate R and TI values), which shall be addressed by the Projects geotechnical report.
136. A geotechnical investigation shall be submitted and based on soil samples taken from the site. Said report should
analyze the existing geotechnical conditions of the site to determine the feasibility of the improvements and to provide
recommendations for the improvements.
137. An Onsite Improvement Plan shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer and include a grading plan,
erosion control plan, onsite water and sewer improvements, onsite storm drain system, onsite signing & striping, and
all necessary details for construction of the improvements.
138. An Offsite Street Improvement Plan for work within the public right-of-way, prepared by a California registered civil
engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval. All offsite improvements shall be clearly called out/detailed on
the plan. Any impacts to Caltrans owned/maintained facilities shall be coordinated with Caltrans for review and
approval.
139. Structural calculations shall be submitted to substantiate the design of all retaining walls. The calculations shall
account for all surcharges. Where new surcharges are created on existing retaining walls, the design of the existing
wall/s shall be analyzed to verify adequacy for said walls to accommodate the new surcharge/s.
140. Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished floor elevation below the rim elevation of the
nearest upstream manhole.
141. If any activity on this Project will disturb any land survey monumentation, including but not limited to vertical control
points (benchmarks), said monumentation shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of licensed land
surveyor or registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying prior to commencement of any activity with
the potential to disturb said monumentation, and a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filed
with the County Surveyor pursuant to Section 8771(b) Business and Professions Code.
142. Pursuant to Sections 8726(b) and/or 8773 of the Business and Professions Code, a Record of Survey or Corner
Record shall be filed under any of the following circumstances:
a. Monuments set to mark property lines or corners;
b. Performance of a field survey to establish property boundary lines for the purposes of construction staking,
establishing setback lines, writing legal descriptions, or for boundary establishment/mapping of the subject
parcel;
c. Any other circumstances pursuant to the Business and Professions Code that would necessitate filing of a
Record of Survey.
143. Construct new 8” Curb & Gutter (C&G) along the Project frontage per San Bernardino County standard 115. The
new C&G shall be located 36 feet from the roadway center line. Provide the necessary roadway width transition to
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 10 | 11
join with the existing C&G at the easterly end of the Project frontage. Coordinate with the City of Grand Terrace and
the City of Colton for the necessary transition improvements at the westerly join location.
144. A Signing & Striping Plan shall be submitted and reviewed with the City during the plan review process.
145. No Parking will be allowed on Barton Road, install “no parking” signs per City and County standards.
146. A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted and provide for new LED lights along the Project frontage in accordance
with City and County standards.
147. Construct new curb adjacent sidewalk along Project frontage per San Bernardino County standard plan 109.
148. The new commercial driveway approach shall be constructed per San Bernardino County standard 128B. Turning
templates/layout shall be shown on the plan to justify the curb return radius of the approach.
149. Coordination with Caltrans is required for facilities that fall under the jurisdiction of Caltrans. Any required Caltrans
approvals will need to be obtained prior to the City’s final approval of the offsite improvement plans.
150. It is anticipated that the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project will begin construction in
the near future by the City of Colton. Prior to completion of the Bridge Removal Project, it will not be feasible for the
Applicant to construct the required roadway widening improvements along the westerly half of the Project frontage
(including the driveway approach for the truck entrance). As such, the Applicant shall construct only interim asphalt
pavement improvements to facilitate site access for the main truck entrance to the site. For the Project frontage east
of said truck entrance, the interim condition shall be the existing conditions. Upon completion of the Barton Road
Bridge Removal Project, the Applicant shall construct the full roadway widening improvements for the remaining
portion of the Project frontage. The required offsite Street Improvement Plan shall provide a separate plan sheet
showing the interim condition improvements.
151. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement, given the uncertainty around timing of the Barton Road Bridge Removal
and Road Construction Project, the Applicant will be permitted to obtain a temporary certificate of occupancy to allow
for full operation of the Project; however, (a) the Applicant shall construct the approved interim public street
improvements until completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project or (b) the
Applicant shall construct the approved final public street improvements after completion of the Barton Road Bridge
Removal and Road Construction Project.
152. The Applicant shall provide an estimate for the ultimate construction of the final street improvement on Barton Road
for the entire frontage of the property and shall post a bond to guarantee the full construction of the improvement.
The bond amount shall be determined by the City Engineer plus a ten percent contingency based upon a report by
Kier and Wright. Upon completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project, the Applicant
shall construct the approved ultimate right of way improvement on Barton Road for the entire frontage.
153. Dedicate sufficient public right-of-way along Barton Road for an ultimate half right of way width of 50 feet, as directed
by the Public Works Division.
154. Depending on the schedule of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project and this
development, the Applicant is required to construct any interim public street improvements to facilitate both Projects,
as applicable, shall accommodate Barton Road Barton Road Bridge Removal Project timeline construction activities
and provide a temporary 10-feet wide construction easement for the duration of the Barton Road Bridge Removal
Project.
155. The Project shall abide by City of Colton water/wastewater standards.
156. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the Applicant must sign and return an
“Acceptance of Conditions” form. The form and content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services
Department.
Building and Safety
157. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Building and Safety Division including
the Conditions of Approval contained in the Building and Safety Memorandum dated November 28, 2023, attached
hereto as Exhibit 1.
158. A building permit shall be required for the development with compliance to the currently adopted California Building
Codes and City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
159. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall pay any associated Development Impact Fees to the
City; this includes but not limited to school fees, Public Works fees, and outside agency fees including but not limited
to Colton Wastewater, Riverside-Highland Water Co., and utilities. Copies of receipts shall be provided to Building &
Safety prior to permit issuance.
160. All construction Projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES), and the
San Bernardino County MS-4 Storm Water Permit.
161. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall establish haul services for construction waste with Burrtec to
facilitate the recycling of all recoverable/recyclable material as required per the California Green Code and City of
Grand Terrace Municipal Code. No self-hauling is allowed.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 11 | 11
162. The Applicant shall submit a completed Construction & Demolition (C&D) Waste Diversion Program / Waste
Management Plan (WMP) form along with the required C&D deposit based per square footage of construction and/or
demolition prior to building permit issuance.
163. Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad certifications shall be submitted to Building &
Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevation and setbacks of the structures.
The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction
reports shall accompany pad certifications. The certifications are required to be signed by the engineer(s) of record.
164. Trash enclosure shall be accessible and include accessibility for wheelchair access including a required 60” interior
turning radius and accessible side door.
165. Truncated domes shall be placed at pedestrian path of travel prior to entering vehicular traffic areas.
166. Plans shall comply with the requirements of the 2022 California Building Code, Chapter 11B for site accessibility and
not the ADA. The City of Grand Terrace Building Division does not enforce the ADA.
167. Separate permits will be required for the following items including but not limited to signs, new building, trash
enclosure, block walls, accessory structures, electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, loading docks, storage racks,
fuel pumps, and any additional items requiring a permit as per CBC 105.1 and the City of Grand Terrace Municipal
Code.
168. Installation of operating electric vehicle (EV) charging stations shall be provided on site as required in CGBSC
5.106.5.3.3. prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
169. Installation of an operating roof mounted photovoltaic (PV) solar and energy storage system as required by the
current California Building Code shall be provided on site prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Panels
shall be hidden from street view by the roof parapet.
170. Installation of automatic fire sprinklers shall be equipped throughout the building and all accessory structures as per
Grand Terrace Municipal Code (GTMC) 15.08.030.
171. Wheel stops shall be installed at all parking spaces adjacent to the building and pedestrian path of travel.
172. All employee areas including but not limited to break rooms, restrooms, lounges, and workspace areas shall be
accessible as required in CBC 11B-101.1 unless exempt as mentioned under CBC 11B-203.
173. Exterior lighting shall be controlled with either an astronomical time clock or programmed to remain on during hours
of building occupancy during evening and night hours. Lighting shall not be turned off nor programmed by motion
sensors during evening and night hours of building occupancy. Please present compliance forms for exterior lighting
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
174. Copies of construction and operating permits from exterior agencies including, but not limited to San Bernardino
County Fire, City of Colton Wastewater, Riverside-Highland Water Company, Air Quality Management District
(AQMD) (if applicable), and San Bernardino County Department of Public Health (if applicable) shall be provided to
the Building Division prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
175. An Automated External Defibrillator (AED), bleeding control kit, and Narcan supply kit shall be installed in the
premises and be easily accessible by staff and the public.
176. The building permit shall be issued after recordation of the lot merger.
177. Only one site address will be issued for the building. Additional addresses will be issued as necessary by the Building
Division.
C.1.b
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
01247.0001/919526.1
Page 1 of 30
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL 22-06) PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 22-02, SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 22-08 TO CONSTRUCT A 173,000
SQUARE-FOOT ASSEMBLY AND MANUFACTURING BUILDING ON
APPROXIMATELY 9.2 ACRES, LOCATED AT 21801 AND 21823
BARTON ROAD (APNs: 1167-121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-
121-07; 1167-131-011; AND A PORTION OF 1167-121-08) IN THE MR-
RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, HINES (“Applicant”) represented by Brad Lynds and Matt Ciccotti, have
filed an application for Conditional Use Permit 22-02; Site and Architectural Review 22-18;
and Environmental 22-06; proposing to construct an assembly and light manufacturing
building up to 170,152 square feet use on 9.2-acres (“Project”). The site improvements
include office space, assembly area, product storage area, 18 dock doors, perimeter wall
and fencing, landscaping, parking, lighting, security features, and ultimate street
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant applied for a Lot Merger 22-02 to join multiple parcels
(APNs 1167-121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-07; 1167-131-011; and a
portion of 1167-121-08) into one lot. The Lot Merger is concurrently being processed
ministerially though City Engineering and Planning Pursuant to the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, cumulatively, Conditional Use Permit 22-02, Site and Architectural
Review 22-18, and Environmental 22-06 are referred to as the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is designated MR-Restricted Manufacturing in the
Zoning Map, and is designated Light Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is located on the south side of Barton Road, between
Terrace Avenue and La Crosse Avenue, at 21801 and 21823 Barton Road (APNs: 1167-
121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-07; 1167-131-011; and a portion of 1167-
121-08); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section
15063, an Initial Study has been prepared for the Project. Based on the analysis and
technical documents, the City intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (E 22-06).
The Project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the results of the
Initial Study with implementation of mitigation measures to reduce or avoid environmental
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 2 of 30
impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and
hazardous materials, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources, and
WHEREAS, the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted for
30-day public review period starting on October 26, 2023, and ending on December 5,
2023 [extended due to the November 23 holiday]; and
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2024, at a duly noticed regular meeting, the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace City Council
Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded
the hearing on said date; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review board hereby finds that
pursuant to CEQA Section 15063, an Initial Study has been prepared for the Project
by the City as the lead agency. Based on the Initial Study and supporting analysis,
a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Project will not have a
significant environmental effect with incorporation of the mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils,
hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural
resources to a less than significant level. The Project is consistent with the General
Plan land use designation and Zoning development standards. The Applicant shall
comply with all mitigation measures contained in the IS/MND’s Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (MMRP).
3. Based upon the forgoing and oral and written communications from members of the
public and City staff (including, but not limited to, oral and written staff reports and
attachments) presented at the February 15, 2024, the Planning Commission/Site
and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect Conditional Use Permit
20-02:
a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort, or general welfate of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed Project or within the city.
1. The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use (“Project”) is
consistent with the Industrial General Plan Land Use Designation and is
consistent with the MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning which supports low
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 3 of 30
intensity and low impact light manufacturing and industrial uses. Land uses
surrounding the Project site consist mainly of commercial and industrial uses,
with multifamily residential located northeast of the Projects site.
The Project is a shell built to suit an assembly and light manufacturing
building, the operational activities will include employees and customers
traveling to and from the site, delivery of materials and supplies to the site,
truck loading and unloading, and assembly and light manufacturing activities.
Equipment such as forklifts, shelving units, automatic machines, conveyor
belts will be utilized in the interior of the facility. There is no outdoor storage
proposed and the Project has been conditioned to keep all storage material
and equipment in the interior of the building.
The proposed hours of operation for deliveries will be from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00
p.m. Loading/unloading of material and deliveries will be prohibited between
11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.; however, the interior operations will be conducted
twenty-four hours/seven days per week (24/7). The 173,000-square foot
assembly and light manufacturing building is proposed to be constructed
approximately in the center of the 9.2-acre property and has an approximate
height of 44-feet. The Project has been designed with loading docks located
on the southwest side of the building, allowing the building and walls to
screen operations and noise from nearby sensitive receptors, located to the
northwest. In addition, the Project is located more than 50 feet from existing
residential uses.
The Project meets the parking requirement of 240 parking spaces with 18
tuck dock doors. Approximately 175 people would be employed on site, with
two shifts per day. There are no anticipated parking issues. In addition, the
Project has been conditioned to have a maximum truck storage consistent
with the number of loading dock doors totaling 18. The Project has been
conditioned so no construction or modifications that increase the number of
loading docks will be supported. In addition, the Project has been conditioned
to undergo a Project review in the same manner as the original conditional
use permit should the site be subleased to more than one tenant business.
The parking will include lighting proposed to be shielded from reflecting in the
public right-of-way and adjacent properties. The Project will have on-site
cameras that will be operated 24/7.
Due to the unidentified tenant, a Conditional Use Permit was required so the
Planning Commission may periodically review this approval to ensure that is
being operated in a manner consistent with the conditions of approval and in
a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties in the vicinity pursuant to Section 18.83.032.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 4 of 30
Based on the items above stated, the proposed use will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing
or working within the City.
2. The proposed use will not be injurious to property or improvements in
the neighborhood or within the city. The Conditional Use Permit allows the
City to impose conditions of approval to prevent impacts to the adjacent
properties caused by operations activities. The Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration includes mitigation measures to prevent and/or
minimize impacts related to biological resources, cultural resources, geology
and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, and tribal
cultural resources. The Project has been conditioned to provide a security
plan and operations plan to be reviewed and approved by San Bernardino
County Sheriff’s and the Planning Director. The proposed use is consistent
with the zoning designation and meets the design standards. The Project
frontage along Barton Road will include ultimate street improvements,
including but not limited to sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street landscape. A
bond will be established to allow for Colton’s Bridge Improvements. The
Project will be conditioned for maintenance of all landscaping areas,
including maintenance of the city’s right-of-way landscape frontage. In
addition, conditions will be included for compliance with the city’s Noise
standards, the lighting must remain on during the hours of operation,
installation of security cameras, on-site maintenance, and overall upkeep to
the building exterior. The proposed Project will not be injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or City. The City has the authority to
revoke a conditional use permit to ensure the community’s health, safety, and
welfare are protected, pursuant to Chapter 18.83-Conditional Use Permit.
b. The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use is consistent with the
Light Industrial General Plan land use designation which permitted uses
typically include light manufacturing and assembly, small scale warehousing
and distribution, research and development, and administrative and service
type of uses. The use is also consistent with the MR-Restricted
Manufacturing zoning designation which supports low intensity and low
impact light manufacturing and industrial uses which operate free of
objectionable noise, dust, odor, or other nuisance to other (non-industrial
uses) in planned, architectural integrated buildings; therefore, the proposal is
consistent General Plan and zoning, and compatible with adjacent uses.
c. Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code and General Plan have been applied to the Project. Conditions of
approval for compliance with operations consistent with the Findings above
stated, consistent with City review, and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 5 of 30
Program have been included. Pursuant to the Municipal Code Section
18.83.080 the Conditional Use Permit may be revoked if any Conditions of
Approval are violated, and if any Federal, State, or local law or ordinance is
violated in connection with a conditional permitted use.
4. Based upon the forgoing and all oral and written communications from members of
the public and City staff (including, but not limited to, all oral and written staff reports
and attachments) presented at the February 15, 2024, public hearing, the Planning
Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to
Site and Architectural Review 22-08.
1. The proposed assembly and light manufacturing use is consistent with the intent
of the Light Industrial General Plan designation intended for uses that can be
made compatible with other surrounding uses within the City regarding noise,
dust, odors, vibration, glare, air, quality, traffic, aesthetics, and hazardous
materials. Supported uses typically include light manufacturing and assembly,
small scale warehousing and distribution, research and development, and
administrative and service type of uses. MR-Restricted Manufacturing zoning,
which supports the development of low intensity and low impact light
manufacturing and industrial uses. The Project requires the Lot Merger
consistent with Goal 2.4. to provide for a mix of attractive industrial land uses
designated to generate employment opportunities and Policy 2.4.5, to assist in
the consolidation and assemblage of properties to assure adequate size quality
development in areas designated as light industrial.
In addition, the proposed manufacturing and light assembly use is consistent with
the Restricted Manufacturing District in the Municipal Code which purpose is to
provide for the development of low intensity and low impact light manufacturing
and industrial uses. The use is permissible in the zoning; however, a Conditional
Use Permit was required to ensure the use remains operating consistent with the
approval. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been conducted for
the Project. The Project meets the purpose of the zoning, and it meets the
applicable development standards, including but not limited to lot coverage,
parking, setbacks, and landscaping requirements.
2. The location and configuration of all structures associated with this Project are
visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, as they
do not interfere with the neighbor’s privacy and do not unnecessarily block scenic
views from other structures and/or public areas and are in scale with the
townscape and natural landscape of the area. The building will be located in the
central area of the Project site. The east perimeter will include a six-foot high
fence with green vines and decorative pilasters every 15-feet with a five-foot
landscape screen landscape area. The south side will include an eight-foot
tubular streel fence, the west will have a combination retaining wall with tubular
steel fence, the north side of the project will be landscaped. The trailer storage
and loading area is enclosed behind a concrete wall and solid steel fence in the
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 6 of 30
west and south. The Project improvements include but are not limited to parking,
lighting, landscape, perimeter fencing/wall and full street improvements. These
improvements are visually harmonious to the site and surrounding area and will
not block scenic views from other structures and are in scale with the townscape
and natural landscape of the area.
3. The architectural design of structures, their materials and colors are visually
harmonious with surrounding development, natural landforms, are functional for
the proposed project and are consistent with this code. The proposed building is
a tilt-up construction with a maximum building height of two stories proposed at
44-feet in accordance with the development standards of the Municipal Code
Chapter 18.39. The building will be concrete tilt-up panel construction with wall
Projections, and five colors and material articulations. The northeast corner of
the building where the main entrance and the 2,400 square foot office is located
will have glazing tempered glass from floor to ceiling. The building colors include
a cool palette in grays and white, and four architectural accents including wood
tile, mullions, grazing, and canopy. The building is consistent and visually
harmonious with the existing commercial/industrial surrounded uses.
4. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually
pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the natural
landscape of the area and nearby developments. The Project proposes
approximately 26,645 square feet (6.6 percent of the site’s area) of landscaping
on-site, which exceeds the 5% minimum landscape requirement. The parking lot
areas located on the northeast and northwest portions of the site would include
15- to 24-inch box trees and 5-inch gallon shrubs. A concrete screen retaining
wall would be constructed that measures 6 feet tall and 8 feet high and would
connect along the west side of the property line. The east side of the site would
be bordered by a 6-foot-tall fence with green vines and decorative pilasters. The
south side will be bordered by an 8-foot-tall tubular steel fence. The front
landscape includes the required 10-feet landscaped setback area. The
landscape and irrigation plans will be in accordance with the requirements of the
Grand Terrace Municipal Code Title 15, Buildings and Construction, Section
15.56, Water Efficient Landscape. The Project’s landscape will visually enhance
the site and be compatible with the surrounding development.
5. There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural
vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus the natural
beauty of the city, its setting and natural landforms are preserved. The Project
site includes approximately 660 linear feet (0.18-acre) of a storm drain alignment
to the southwest, asphalt/paved parking areas, concrete slab, and sparse
vegetation with approximately twenty trees, mainly along the perimeter. Soils
onsite consist of alluvium, comprised of clay, silt and gravel. The overall site
topography slopes downward to the south at a gradient of less than one percent,
with the exception of some local variation. The elevation at the Project site is
approximately 970 feet above mean sea level.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 7 of 30
6. The design and location of all signs associated with this project are consistent
with the scale and character of the building to which they are attached or
otherwise associated with and are consistent with this code. No sign or
monument proposals have been reviewed as part of this approval. The following
condition has been included: Condition of Approval No. 85, “Signs are not
approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new signs, the
Applicant shall submit an application, and receive approval, for a sign permit from
the Planning Division (pursuant to Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code) and a building permit for construction of the signs from the Building
Division, as applicable. The design and location of future signs shall be
consistent with the scale and character of the building.”
7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of this
code and general plan are made a part of this approval. Conditions of approval
for compliance with the Findings above stated and consistent with City review,
and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program have been incorporated; including
but not limited to prohibiting outside building operations from the hours of 11:00
p.m. to 6:00 a.m., prohibiting outdoor storage of non-material handling
equipment, restricting outdoor storage of material handling equipment such as
forklifts and yard goats to the 18 loading dock parking spaces, restricting on-site
trucks to the number of loading docks approved, and prohibiting construction or
modifications to the building that increase the number of loading dock areas. The
project was conditioned to obtained easements clearances and obtain a
recorded Lot Merger prior to the issuance of a building permit. A condition was
also included requiring the Applicant to implement the adopted Mitigation
Monitoring Reporting Program and Mitigation Measures listed. The City will
contract with a specialized consultant to certify the MMRP and the Applicant will
bear the cost of the consultation services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the forgoing and all oral and written
communications from members of the public and City staff (including, but not limited to, all
oral and written staff reports and attachments) presented at the February 15 2024, Public
Hearing, Conditional Use Permit 22-02 and Site and Architectural Review 22-08, are
hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
Project Description
1. This Project is approved to establish an approximately 170,152 square foot
assembly and light manufacturing building on 9.2-acres, with 4,800 square feet of
office space, 115,026 square feet of assembly storage and 50,326 square feet of
assembly space, 18 dock doors, and 244 auto parking spaces. The Project includes
significant landscaping roughly about 25-feet along Barton Road to enhance
frontage. The parking lot areas located northeast, and northwest include trees and
shrubs. The Project will include a retaining wall that measures 6-feet tall with tubular
steel fence on top along the west side of the property line. The east side of the
property will be fenced with a 6-foot fence with artificial green vines and decorative
pilasters. The south side of the property will be fenced with an 8-feet high tubular
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 8 of 30
steel fence. All utilities such as electricity, sewer, and water will be connecting to
existing facilities will be required to be underground. The Project site will be
accessed via one driveway along Barton Road. The northwest driveway is roughly
70-feet and will be the primary truck and passenger car access point. A second
driveway is included for emergency vehicle access only. Internal circulation will be
via 30 feet drive aisles. The Project provides a total of two hundred forty-four
(244) total parking spaces, which are comprised of two hundred thirty-seven (237)
standard stalls, five (5) standard ADA accessible stalls, and two (2) ADA van
accessible stalls. Forty-nine (49) of the parking stalls will be EV capable. The site
improvements include, but are not limited to, demolition and removal of existing
concrete pads and asphalt paved areas, construction of perimeter wall and fencing,
landscaping, parking, trash enclosure, lighting, security features, and construction
of ultimate street improvements at the project’s frontage (Barton Road).
Approximately 175 persons would be employed on site, with one or more shift
periods. Twenty-four (24) hours/seven days per week activity will be allowed
exclusively in the interior of the building. Deliveries to and from the site and loading
and unloading operations will be prohibited from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Construction activities for the Project would occur over one phase and include
demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural
coatings. Demolition will take less than one month to complete as the western
portion of the site has already been demoed. Building construction will take ten
months. Paving will take two months and Landscape will take four months. An initial
study/mitigated negative declaration has been prepared for this proposal. The
application materials are approved as submitted and conditioned herein and shall
not be further altered except as modified by these conditions of approval and
mitigation measures, and unless reviewed and approved by the affected
departments.
General Conditions
2. If not appealed, this approval shall become effective on the eleventh (11th) day after
the date of the Planning Commission’s approval; or the next city business day
following such eleventh (11th) day when the eleventh (11th) day is not a city
business day. This approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of
adoption of this Resolution unless building permits have been issued and a
substantial investment in reliance of those permits has occurred; all conditions of
approval have been met; or a time extension has been granted by the Planning and
Development Services Director, in accordance with Chapter 18.83, and Chapter
18.63 of the Zoning Code. Time extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days
prior to the expiration date. The Planning Director may, upon application by the
Applicant, extend the compliance period for a up to one year. No approval shall be
extended by the Planning Director to a date beyond two years from the date of the
initial approval.
3. Minor modifications to this approval which are determined by the Planning and
Development Services Director to be in substantial conformance with the approved
site plan, and which do not intensify or change the use or require any deviations
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 9 of 30
from adopted standards, may be approved by the Planning and Development
Services Director upon submittal of the required application(s) and the required
fee(s) consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
4. Operational and construction activities associated with the Project shall comply with
the regulations of the City’s Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.108 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code.
5. Applicant shall work with the City’s franchised solid waste hauler, Burrtec, to follow
a debris management plan to divert the material from landfills by the use of separate
recycling bins (e.g., wood, concrete, steel, aggregate, glass) during demolition and
construction to minimize waste and promote recycle and reuse of the materials.
6. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in Burrtec dumpsters pursuant to City
Codes and removed from the premises on an as needed basis. At the end of each
day of construction activity, all construction debris and waste materials shall be
collected and properly disposed of in trash or recycle bins. General Contractor shall
sweep the Project site at the end of the day during construction.
7. Approved hours of operation: Twenty-four (24) hours/seven days per week
operation activity will be allowed exclusively in the interior of the building and
deliveries to and from the site and loading and unloading operations will be
prohibited from 11:00p.m. to 6:00 a.m. as identified on the table below.
Hours of Operation
Permitted Prohibited
Inside building
operations
24 hours/7 days per week ---
Outside building
operations
6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
8. Exterior speakers are prohibited.
9. Outdoor storage, including but not limited to non-material handling equipment,
materials, and staging of materials shall be prohibited. Materials and non-material
handling equipment shall be kept in the interior of the building overnight. Outdoor
storage of material handling equipment such as forklifts and yard goats shall be
restricted to the 18 loading dock parking spaces.
10. Parking of semi-trailers, semi-trailer trucks, shipment containers outside the
designated eighteen (18) truck bays is prohibited. No more than 18 semi-trailers
shall be stored onsite overnight at any given time without City Council approval. No
construction or modifications that increase the number of loading docks shall be
approved without City Council approval.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 10 of 30
11. No indoor furniture, materials, and or non-material handling equipment shall be
allowed outdoors. All exterior walkways shall be kept clear for handicapped
accessibility.
12. A building permit shall be obtained for any tenant improvement construction,
remodel, renovation, or expansion.
13. Revisions or modifications requested by the Applicant, including but not limited to
changes to these conditions, expansions, land use intensity, or hours of operation,
shall be processed in the same manner as the original approval consistent with
Municipal Code Chapter 18.83 and Chapter 18.63.
14. The Planning Commission may periodically review any conditional use permit to
ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent with conditions of approval
or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. If, after review, the commission
deems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant full examination, then a public
hearing date shall be set. At such public hearing, the Planning Commission may
modify or revoke the permit pursuant to Section 18.83.080.
15. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City, and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and officers, officials, employees, or agents
thereof, from any and all claims, actions, suits, proceedings, or judgments against
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, and any officers, officials,
employees, or agents thereof to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board, or
legislative body, including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Project and the approvals granted herein. Furthermore, the Applicant shall
indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, against any and all claims, actions, suits, proceedings, or
judgments against another governmental entity in which the Applicant’s Project is
subject to that other governmental entity's approval and a condition of such approval
is that the City indemnify and defend such governmental entity.
16. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
Applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the city,
their affiliate’s officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding
against the City of Grand Terrace. The Applicant further agrees to reimburse the
City of any costs and attorneys’ fees, which the City may be required by a court to
pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve Applicant of
his or her obligation under this condition.
17. Upon approval of these conditions by the Planning Commission and prior to
becoming final and binding, the Applicant must sign and return an “Acceptance of
Conditions” form. The form and content shall be prepared by the Planning and
Development Services Department.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 11 of 30
18. In the event that exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written
conditions shall prevail.
19. The Applicant shall comply with all laws, including but not limited to all Federal,
State, County and Local laws, at all times.
20. The Applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance
of the site.
21. Any future development on the site, including alterations, conversions, remodels,
and new structures shall require compliance with the Municipal Code.
22. Any future changes in on-site activities shall require submittal, review, and approval
of a modified conditional use permit.
23. A copy of the accepted Conditions of Approval shall be placed on the final
construction plans. Final construction plans shall be placed at the job site until
receipt of final Certificate of Occupancy. The Applicant/Developer shall be fully
responsible for knowing and complying with all Conditions of Approval.
24. The Applicant shall implement SCAQMD Rule 403 and standard construction
practices during all operations capable of generating fugitive dust, which will include
but not be limited to the use of best available control measures and reasonably
available control measures such as:
a. Water active grading areas and staging areas at least twice daily as needed;
b. Ensure that all disturbed areas are treated to prevent erosion until the site is
constructed upon.
c. Ensure that landscaped areas are installed as soon as possible to reduce the
potential for wind erosion.
d. Suspend grading activities when wind gusts exceed 25 mph;
e. Sweep public paved roads if visible soil material is carried off-site;
f. Enforce on-site speed limits on unpaved surface to 15 mph; and
g. Discontinue construction activities during Stage 1 smog episodes.
25. The Applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance
of the site, including parking lot paving condition and striping, clearing of trash,
weeds and debris, lighting, and other site improvements. All parking facilities shall
be maintained in good condition, no cracks, no potholes, no fading parking stripping.
The maintenance thereof may include but shall not be limited to the repaving,
sealing, and striping of a parking area and the repair, restoration and/or replacement
of any parking area design features when deemed necessary by the City to insure
the health, safety, and welfare of the general public.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 12 of 30
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP)
26. The Applicant shall implement the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Report Program
(MMRP) that is attached and part of these Conditions of Approval and shall comply
with all mitigations listed in the program including but not limited to measures to
reduce or offset potential environmental impacts to: biological resources, cultural
resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise,
transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The Applicant shall contract with
various licensed, specialized professionals as described in the MMRP in order to
certify that the MMRP has been implemented; further, the Applicant shall bear the
cost of their consultation services. The Applicant shall provide a letter or copy of
each agreement with the licensed, specialized professionals to the City of Grand
Terrace Planning Department prior to the start of said mitigation measure(s) stating
that the licensed, specialized professionals have been retained to provide services
for the Project as stated in the adopted MMRP.
Landscaping
26. During the first Plan Check submittal, the Applicant shall submit three sets of final
landscape plan(s) and a digital copy prepared by a state licensed Landscape
Architect, subject to the approval of the Community Development Department, and
Public Works Department for and required landscaping in the public right-of-way.
Landscape plans for any Landscape Maintenance District shall be on separate
plans. An initial $2,000 Irrigation and landscape deposit shall be included with the
submittal for review and inspection by the city’s consulting engineering.
27. The final landscape plans shall conform to the City’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance (Chapter 15.56) Landscaping Standards contained in Chapter 18.60 of
the Zoning Code and in compliance with the most recent version of the State Model
Ordinance.
28. Final landscape and irrigation plans shall be in substantial conformance with the
approved conceptual landscape plan and the conditions of approval including areas
of public right-of-way. All fencing or walls shall be illustrated on the final landscape
plan.
29. Applicant shall maintain the property and landscaping in a clean without weeds and
debris and all dead and dying plants shall be replaced.
30. For the lifetime of this Project, Applicant must replace all dead or missing plants and
trees as to comply with the approved landscape plan. The replacement plants and
trees shall be similar or equivalent type, size, and height of the specimen being
replaced as originally planted pursuant to the approved Landscaping and Irrigation
Plan. The plant material replacement shall be installed within 30 days of being
notified by city staff.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 13 of 30
31. Landscape plans shall depict the utility laterals, concrete improvements, and tree
locations. Any modifications to the landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Public Works and Community Development Departments prior to issuance
of permits.
32. Improvement plans shall include all connections and locations to the City mains for
on-site irrigation, including all meter and backflow prevention devices.
33. All irrigation shall be “purple pipe” at the property, and when reclaimed water
infrastructure becomes available to the Project, the Property Owner shall disconnect
irrigation from potable source and connect to reclaimed water source resulting in a
non-potable irrigation system for the Project.
34. Applicant must install root barriers, adjacent to back side of sidewalk, when planting
on-site tree(s) within 10 feet from the public right-of-way and public sidewalk.
35. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the landscape inspection shall be
approved by city staff. The final landscape inspection shall be requested by the
Applicant a week prior to the desired inspection date.
36. The landscaping plans shall include dimensions and show location of fire hydrants
and parking lighting.
37. The perimeter fencing to the east shall include a 6-foot fence with artificial (Grasstik
or an equal product approved by the City) green vines and decorative pilasters.
Prior to Grading
38. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit a photometric plan
and final lighting plan to City staff showing the exact locations of light poles and the
orientation and shielding of all light fixtures to prevent glare onto existing and
potential future development surrounding the Project Site.
39. Lighting shall remain on during nighttime hours of operations and security cameras
shall be installed.
40. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the City Engineer
a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm
Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has
been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction
Permit.
41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Applicant must submit improvement plans on
minimum 24" x 36" sheets having the City's standard signature blocks. All plans
must be drawn in ink and must be signed by a California State Registered Civil
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 14 of 30
Engineer at the time of first submittal. Applicant must submit improvement plans for
the entire Project as one package and must include all Project improvements shown
on the approved Project exhibits and those to be designed per these Conditions.
Piecemeal submittal of plans is not acceptable. Plans and studies must be signed
by a California State Registered Civil Engineer at the time of first submittal. This
package must include all supporting studies.
42. Under no condition shall there be stockpiling of material prior to the issuance of the
first grading permit and related condition of approval for the grading permit have
been obtained.
43. The Applicant shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES).
44. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain clearances,
including but not limited to license agreements, quitclaims, or other applicable
documentation for all easements traversing the Project site. A copy of the easement
clearances shall be provided to the City Engineer for review. Easements (as shown
on the Easement Exhibit attached hereto) and their corresponding method of
clearance are detailed below:
Label
Type Easement
Holder
Recording
Date
Recording
No.
Title
Report &
Exc. No.
Method of
Clearance
A Electrical
Southern
Sierras
Power
Company
4/22/1912 Book 503
Page 292
of Deed
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
3
Quitclaim
B Electrical /
Communication
Southern
California
Edison
Company
4/4/1961 Book 5394
Page 506
of Official
Records
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
6
Quitclaim
C Sewers
County
Services
Area 70,
Improvement
Zone, H
4/2/1975 Book 8648
Page 441
of Official
Records
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
9
Email from
City of
Colton
approving
sewer
plan
(easement
to remain)
F Fiber Optic /
Communication
AT&T, as
successor to
Union Pacific
Railroad
Company
6/1/2007
and
9/2/2021
2021-
0401054
and 2007-
0329371,
of Official
Records
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
10 & 11
Email from
AT&T
approving
storm
drain plan
(easement
to remain)
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 15 of 30
G Electrical /
Communication
Southern
Sierras
Power
Company
4/17/1914 Book 547
of Deeds,
Page 360
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
4
Quitclaim
J Public Highway
County of
San
Bernardino
5/25/1920 Book 685,
Page 356,
of Deeds
01910638-
919-EGL-
EGL, Exc.
5
Dedication
in fee to
the City
45. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the ministerial review and approval of Lot
Merger 22-02 to join APNs 1167-121-02; 1167-121-03; 1167-121-04; 1167-121-07;
1167-131-011; and a portion of 1167-121-08, shall be recorded and accepted by
San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office. The City Engineer shall review and
approve the final documents prior to recordation. The City Clerk Division shall record
the Lot Merger, the review and recording fees shall be borne by the Project
Applicant.
46. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a bond or legal
document to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director
for the future completion of the ultimate street improvements at Barton Road. The
street improvements shall be consistent with the City of Colton bridge
improvements, including but not limited to:
a. The Applicant shall provide the required right-of-way dedication to construct
the ultimate Barton Road right-of-way. The dedication documents shall be
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Engineer prior to recordation.
The review and recording fee shall be borne by the Applicant.
b. The Applicant shall construct interim public street improvements to facilitate
the Barton Bridge Removal Project.
c. The Applicant shall replant Projects required front landscaping setback and
parkway landscape affected during the bridge improvements.
Prior to Construction
47. Upon Planning Commission approval, Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of
professionally prepared plans to the Building and Safety Division’s Plan Check
process. Plans must comply with the adopted California Building and Fire Code at
the time of submittal. Two copies will be for Building, one for Fire, one for Public
Works.
48. Along with those sets, the Applicant shall also submit two sets of structural
calculations and two sets of Title 24.
49. Any studies required within these conditions require a deposit to cover the cost of
the review of the studies. Additional deposits may be required, or a refund issued
when the costs do not match the deposits.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 16 of 30
50. Pay appropriate fees for plan check, inspection, and microfilming and storage of
maps and plans, and any other required fees.
51. Per the City Engineer, provide adequate corner sight distance per Caltrans
standards at entry to site (main driveway) and submit verification of same to the
Public Works Department as required in conjunction with plan checking of the street
improvement plans. For clarity, emergency vehicle driveway shall not require sight
distance per Caltrans standards.
52. Applicant must provide utilities and design improvements such that all existing and
new distribution utilities except for electrical lines of 33 KVA or more are
underground and meeting city specifications, including location, distance, and
separation requirements, and away from driveways and trees. For clarity, the City
has approved the overhead transmission relocation Project (SCE Project ID # 2755).
53. Prior to issuance of building permits for the perimeter decorative block walls/fences
on shared property lines, the Applicant shall submit a Fence/Wall Agreement signed
by the adjacent property owners authorizing construction of the wall/fence on the
shared property line. In the absence of a Fence/Wall agreement, the construction
plans shall demonstrate the perimeter decorative block walls/fences to be
constructed entirely inside the Project’s property line. The fence shall be constructed
consistent with the approved site plan, including decorative pilasters and privacy
hedges.
54. Public utility easements shall be dedicated to cover all utilities either by map or
separate document.
55. The precise grading plan with hydrology study, hydraulic calculations, and soils
report for the Project shall be approved by the City Public Works Department prior
to issuance of any building permits.
56. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with
all City codes.
57. The Applicant shall ensure that all construction contractors and subcontractor
personnel are made aware of the required best management practices and good
housekeeping measures for the Project construction site and any associated
construction lay-down areas. Any surplus construction materials shall be stored so
as to be screened from public view when not in use and be removed from the
property upon completion of construction activities.
58. All parking spaces, loading areas, and drive aisles shall comply with the standards
established in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
59. Construct any and all City required street improvements (including, but not limited
to curb and gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, aggregate base, sidewalk, one drive
approach per lot, and streetlights) on all interior streets.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 17 of 30
60. Applicant shall comply with the prevailing City standards and requirements at the
time of construction.
61. Any abandoned wells on the property or similar structures shall be destroyed in a
manner approved by the Public Works Department in accordance with the State of
California Department of Health Services or other appropriate oversight agency.
62. Applicant shall pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public
utilities, as necessary.
63. The Applicant shall design public improvements including sidewalk, drive
approaches and handicap ramps in accordance with all requirements of the State
of California Accessibility Standards, Title 24 California Administrative Code.
64. Applicant must install and maintain any and all City required street trees, parkway
landscaping, and irrigation system within the development during construction
phase. Once installed, the property owner must maintain this improvement in
perpetuity.
65. Applicant shall require that all construction equipment is properly maintained with
operating mufflers and air intake silencers and prioritizes the location of equipment
staging and storage as far as practical from the existing residential unit south of the
site, respectively.
66. All necessary precautions and preventive measures shall be in place in order to
prevent material from being washed away by surface waters or blown by wind.
These controls shall include at a minimum: regular wetting of surface or other similar
wind control method, installation of straw or fiber mats to prevent rain related
erosion. Detention basin(s) or other appropriately sized barrier to surface flow must
be installed at the discharge point(s) of drainage from the site. Any water collected
from these controls shall be appropriately disposed of at a disposal site. These
measures shall be added as general notes on the site plan and a statement added
that the operator is responsible for ensuring that these measures continue to be
effective during the duration of the Project construction.
67. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code in effect at the time of approval, and includes development
standards and requirements relating to: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor
control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration
control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to
the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
until compliance is met. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers,
boxes, ducts, or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 18 of 30
element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the
ground.
68. During construction of the site, the Project shall comply with Grand Terrace
Municipal Code Section 8.108.040 (Special Activities) which prohibits construction
activities between the hours of 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday,
and no construction activity shall take place at any time on Sunday or national
holydays. No heavy construction occurring on weekends or national holidays.
69. The Applicant shall work with the City’s franchised solid waste hauler to follow a
debris management plan to divert the material from landfills by the use of separate
recycling bins (e.g., wood, concrete, steel, aggregate, glass) during demolition and
construction to minimize waste and promote recycle and reuse of the materials.
70. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, the Applicant shall submit to the
Community Development Department proof of payment or waiver from both the City
of San Bernardino for sewer capacity fees and Colton Unified School District for
school impact fees.
71. All Development Impact fees shall be paid to the City of Grand Terrace prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
72. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall comply with Burrtec’s
requirements per AB 2766 and Burrtec’s Conditions of Approval included in the
Memorandum dated, November 18, 2022, attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
Prior to Occupancy
73. Prior to occupancy Applicant must complete all improvements per the accepted
plans and approved conditions and obtain acceptance for the improvements from
the City.
74. Prior to requesting a final inspection for release of securities, Applicant must submit
record drawings, certifications, final soils report, and a digital file of record drawings
to the City.
75. Any "Record Revisions" or “As-Builts” shall be made to all plans to reflect the
changes to the improvements as constructed.
76. Comply with all state law regarding waste management and the City’s Integrated
Waste Management Ordinance.
77. Install any and all required street name signs and traffic control signs with locations
and types approved by the Public Works Department.
78. To the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the streetlights shall be installed and
energized prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building and Safety
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 19 of 30
Division. The make and model of the streetlights needs to be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer prior to installation. Notwithstanding the foregoing
requirement, given that the streetlights are part of an independent project, the
Applicant will be permitted to obtain a temporary certificate of occupancy to allow
for full operation of the project while completing the necessary work to install and
energize the streetlights.
79. All additional drainage due to development shall be mitigated on-site, no cross-lot
drainage will be allowed unless suitable easements are provided.
80. Any damage to existing improvements as a result of this Project shall be repaired
by the Applicant to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
81. The Applicant shall screen all mechanical equipment including the HVAC units from
public view.
82. All infrastructural “tagging” denoting the presence of some subterranean
infrastructure or encode instruction for construction or maintenance workers that is
associated with this Project shall be removed by the Applicant prior to issuance of
any Certificate of Occupancy.
83. The Applicant shall screen all ground mounted equipment, including backflow
devices, in a manner that does not impede traffic visibility. Screening is in addition
to required backflow protection cages/enclosures that shall be required for all
backflow preventer valves, irrigation valves, bypass meter assemblies and similar
devices associated with the development.
84. Signs are not approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new signs,
the Applicant shall submit an application, and receive approval, for a sign permit
from the Planning Division (pursuant to Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code) and a building permit for construction of the signs from the Building
Division, as applicable.
85. The Applicant shall submit final grade certifications, by the grading engineer, to the
Public Works Department prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.
86. Prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy of the building, Applicant
must have completed installation of any and all public right-of-way improvements as
shown on the City approved improvement plans.
87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the future tenant shall comply
with Local, State, and Federal requirements, and obtain a City’s Business License
from the Finance Department prior to initiating business operations. The business
license shall be renewed annually, at the beginning of each calendar year, during
the month of January, for as long as the business in operation.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 20 of 30
88. Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted separately to be reviewed and
approved by Building and Safety Division.
89. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and concurrent with the business
license application, any tenant that will be leasing the facility shall coordinate with
the San Bernardino’s Sheriff’s department and submit a security plan to the City of
Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department. Any revisions to
the security plan by either the property owner or tenant must go through the County
of San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department for approval of the revisions then submitted
to the City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department.
90. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any tenant leasing the facility
shall submit an operations plan of their business operations. The operations shall in
no way deviate from the approved use and shall abide by the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code. The operations plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Department
within 30 days of the draft operations plan submittal. Approval or
comments/corrections shall be provided back to the applicant within the 30-day
review deadline. Upon second submittal, the City shall review
comments/corrections within 15 days and issue approval of the business
operations, provided the business operations are consistent with the conditions of
approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program.
91. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any tenant that will be leasing
the facility shall set up waste services with Burrtec and comply with the required
trash collection services as required by Burrtec.
Fire Department
92. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval contained in the San
Bernardino County Fire Department, permit number FPLN-2022-00215, attached
hereto as Exhibit 3.
93. The development shall have a minimum of two points of vehicular access. These
are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. a. Single Story
Road Access Width. All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads,
alleys, and private drives with a minimum twenty-six (26) foot unobstructed width
and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized
standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions. b. Multi-
Story Road Access Width. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a
minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14)
feet six (6) inches in height.
94. Roadways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the
Fire Department. These shall be extended to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of
and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story
of any building.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 21 of 30
95. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval.
96. Commercial and industrial developments in excess of 100,000 sq. ft. shall have the
street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum twelve (12)
inches in height and with a one and one half (1 ½) inch stroke. The street address
shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be
electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200)
feet or more from the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch
numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.
97. An automatic fire sprinkler monitoring fire alarm system complying with the
California Fire Code, NFPA and all codes is required. The Applicant shall hire a Fire
Department approved fire alarm contractor. The fire alarm contractor shall submit
detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees
shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.
98. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design
shall be approved by the Fire Department.
99. The required fire fees shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire
Department/Community Safety Division.
100. The Applicant is required to produce a current flow test report from your water
purveyor demonstrating that the fire flow demand is satisfied. This requirement shall
be completed prior to combination inspection by Building and Safety.
101. The Applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and
approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red. The "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs
shall be installed on public/private roads in accordance with the approved plan.
102. An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Pamphlet #13 and the Fire
Department standards is required. The Applicant shall hire a Fire Department
approved fire sprinkler contractor. The fire sprinkler contractor shall submit plans to
the with hydraulic calculation and manufacturers specification sheets to the Fire
Department for approval and approval. The contractor shall submit plans showing
type of storage and use with the applicable protection system. The required fees
shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.
103. The Applicant shall contact the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Hazardous
Materials Division (909) 386-8401 for review and approval of building plans, where
the planned use of such buildings will or may use hazardous materials or generate
hazardous waste materials.
104. The Applicant shall submit an application for all high-piled storage (internal storage
over 12’ in height), detailed plans and a commodity analysis report to the Fire
Department for review and approval. The Applicant shall submit the approved plan
to Building and Safety for review with building plans. If the occupancy classification
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 22 of 30
is designated as S-2, commodities to be stored will be limited to products of light
hazard classification only. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan
submittal.
105. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed
as specified by the Fire Department.
106. Permission to occupy or use the building (certificate of Occupancy or shell release)
will not be granted until the Fire Department inspects, approves, and signs off on
the Building and Safety job card for “fire final.”
107. The above referenced Project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County
Fire Department herein “Fire Department.” Prior to any construction occurring on
any parcel, the Applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current
fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current
California Fire Code requirements and all codes, ordinances, and standards of the
Fire Department.
108. An approved Fire Department key box is required. In commercial, industrial, and
multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department
Knox Lock.
109. The Applicant shall install Fire Department approved material identification placards
on the outside of all buildings and/or storage tanks that store or plan to store
hazardous or flammable materials in all locations deemed appropriate by the Fire
Department. Additional placards shall be required inside the buildings when
chemicals are segregated into separate areas. Any business with an N.F.P.A. 704
rating of 2-3-3 or above shall be required to install an approved key box vault on the
premises, which shall contain business access keys and a business plan.
110. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department
override switch (Knox ®) is required.
111. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the primary access road
shall be paved or an all-weather surface and shall be installed as specified in the
General Requirement conditions, including width, vertical clearance, and turnouts.
112. A letter from a licensed structural (or truss) engineer shall be submitted with an
original wet stamp at time of fire sprinkler plan review, verifying the roof is capable
of accepting the point loads imposed on the building by the fire sprinkler system
design.
113. Prior to building permits being issued to any new structure, the secondary access
road shall be paved or an all-weather surface and shall be installed as specified in
the General Requirement conditions including width, vertical clearance, and
turnouts.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 23 of 30
114. Mechanical smoke removal systems shall be provided for building protected by
EFSR sprinkler systems as required by the Chief. The mechanical smoke removal
systems shall meet the requirements of CFC and SBCOFD Standards.
115. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather
driving capabilities. Road surface shall meet the approval of the Fire Chief prior to
installation. All roads shall be designed to 85% compaction and/or paving and hold
the weight of Fire Apparatus at a minimum of 80K pounds.
116. Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the
required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire
Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using California Fire
Code. The Fire Flow for this Project shall be: 3750 GPM for a 3-hour duration at 20
psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow is based on a 168,191 sq. ft. structure.
117. A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. The
system shall be operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site. The
Applicant is required to provide a minimum of one new six (6) inch fire hydrant
assembly with one (1) two and one half (2 1/2) inch and two (2) four (4) inch outlet.
All fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart (as
measured along vehicular travel-ways) and no more than one hundred fifty (150)
feet from any portion of a structure.
Public Works
118. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Public
Works Division, including the Conditions of Approval contained in the Public Works
Memorandum dated August 28, 2023, attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
119. All work shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction (Green Book), County of San Bernardino Standards,
and City of Grand Terrace Standards.
120. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City
standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone,
water, sewer, and cable TV.
121. Improvements at Barton Road will require coordination with and review/approval by
the City of Grand Terrace in coordination with the City of Colton Bridge Improvement
Project.
122. Public sewer improvement plans shall be submitted to the City of Colton Wastewater
Department and Public Works for plan review and approval.
123. Public water improvements plans shall be submitted to Riverside Highland Water
Company for review and approval.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 24 of 30
124. Water improvement plans for fire hydrants shall be submitted to the County of San
Bernardino Fire Department for plan review and approval.
125. All distribution lines shall be undergrounded, if not already, within the parcel and
along the Project frontage. For clarity, the overhead transmission relocation Project
(SCE Project ID # 2755) shall not be undergrounded.
126. All improvements occurring within and impacting the City of Riverside owned parcel
crossing the site shall be coordinated with the City of Riverside. The necessary
license agreement over said parcel shall be secured prior to final engineering plan
approvals. The license area shall be plotted and identified on the submitted plans.
127. Pavement restoration and trench repair for any street cuts shall be in conformance
with San Bernardino County standards or as approved by the City Engineer.
128. Onsite improvements shall comply with the requirements of the California Building
Code, Title 24.
129. The developer shall restore any public improvements damaged during construction.
130. A drainage study will be required for the Project in accordance with the San
Bernardino County hydrology manual. Any drainage improvements needed to
mitigate the increase in runoff (for the 100-year storm event), mitigate downstream
impacts, and/or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the
developer’s expense.
131. Concentrated drainage directed to the public street shall not be conveyed across
the sidewalk or driveway approaches, but rather through parkway culverts/under
sidewalk drains in accordance with San Bernardino County standards, SPPWC
standards or as approved by the City Engineer.
132. If the grading plan indicates export or import, the site of the import or the site for the
deposition of the export shall be noted on the grading plan. Permit/s may be required
for the source or destination site of the material.
133. A final WQMP submittal will be required during final engineering stage. All infiltration
treatment BMPs shall require site specific infiltration testing shall be conducted to
substantiate the design infiltration rate used in the WQMP calculations in
accordance with the San Bernardino Technical Guidance Document for Water
Quality Management Plans – Appendix D (Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol).
134. This Project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems
(NPDES). Verification of coverage under the State Construction General Permit
(CGP) will be required before a grading permit will be issued by providing a copy of
the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and printing the WDID # on the
Onsite Grading Plan.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 25 of 30
135. All pavement sections (onsite and offsite) shall be substantiated with pavement
section recommendations (based on the appropriate R and TI values), which shall
be addressed by the Projects geotechnical report.
136. A geotechnical investigation shall be submitted and based on soil samples taken
from the site. Said report should analyze the existing geotechnical conditions of the
site to determine the feasibility of the improvements and to provide
recommendations for the improvements.
137. An Onsite Improvement Plan shall be prepared by a California registered civil
engineer and include a grading plan, erosion control plan, onsite water and sewer
improvements, onsite storm drain system, onsite signing & striping, and all
necessary details for construction of the improvements.
138. An Offsite Street Improvement Plan for work within the public right-of-way, prepared
by a California registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval.
All offsite improvements shall be clearly called out/detailed on the plan. Any impacts
to Caltrans owned/maintained facilities shall be coordinated with Caltrans for review
and approval.
139. Structural calculations shall be submitted to substantiate the design of all retaining
walls. The calculations shall account for all surcharges. Where new surcharges are
created on existing retaining walls, the design of the existing wall/s shall be analyzed
to verify adequacy for said walls to accommodate the new surcharge/s.
140. Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished floor
elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole.
141. If any activity on this Project will disturb any land survey monumentation, including
but not limited to vertical control points (benchmarks), said monumentation shall be
located and referenced by or under the direction of licensed land surveyor or
registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying prior to
commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb said monumentation, and
a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filed with the County
Surveyor pursuant to Section 8771(b) Business and Professions Code.
142. Pursuant to Sections 8726(b) and/or 8773 of the Business and Professions Code,
a Record of Survey or Corner Record shall be filed under any of the following
circumstances:
a. Monuments set to mark property lines or corners;
b. Performance of a field survey to establish property boundary lines for the
purposes of construction staking, establishing setback lines, writing legal
descriptions, or for boundary establishment/mapping of the subject parcel;
c. Any other circumstances pursuant to the Business and Professions Code
that would necessitate filing of a Record of Survey.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 26 of 30
143. Construct new 8” Curb & Gutter (C&G) along the Project frontage per San
Bernardino County standard 115. The new C&G shall be located 36 feet from the
roadway center line. Provide the necessary roadway width transition to join with the
existing C&G at the easterly end of the Project frontage. Coordinate with the City of
Grand Terrace and the City of Colton for the necessary transition improvements at
the westerly join location.
144. A Signing & Striping Plan shall be submitted and reviewed with the City during the
plan review process.
145. No Parking will be allowed on Barton Road, install “no parking” signs per City and
County standards.
146. A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted and provide for new LED lights along the
Project frontage in accordance with City and County standards.
147. Construct new curb adjacent sidewalk along Project frontage per San Bernardino
County standard plan 109.
148. The new commercial driveway approach shall be constructed per San Bernardino
County standard 128B. Turning templates/layout shall be shown on the plan to
justify the curb return radius of the approach.
149. Coordination with Caltrans is required for facilities that fall under the jurisdiction of
Caltrans. Any required Caltrans approvals will need to be obtained prior to the City’s
final approval of the offsite improvement plans.
150. It is anticipated that the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction
Project will begin construction in the near future by the City of Colton. Prior to
completion of the Bridge Removal Project, it will not be feasible for the Applicant to
construct the required roadway widening improvements along the westerly half of
the Project frontage (including the driveway approach for the truck entrance). As
such, the Applicant shall construct only interim asphalt pavement improvements to
facilitate site access for the main truck entrance to the site. For the Project frontage
east of said truck entrance, the interim condition shall be the existing conditions.
Upon completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal Project, the Applicant shall
construct the full roadway widening improvements for the remaining portion of the
Project frontage. The required offsite Street Improvement Plan shall provide a
separate plan sheet showing the interim condition improvements.
151. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement, given the uncertainty around timing of
the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project, the Applicant will
be permitted to obtain a temporary certificate of occupancy to allow for full operation
of the Project; however, (a) the Applicant shall construct the approved interim public
street improvements until completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road
Construction Project or (b) the Applicant shall construct the approved final public
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 27 of 30
street improvements after completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road
Construction Project.
152. The Applicant shall provide an estimate for the ultimate construction of the final
street improvement on Barton Road for the entire frontage of the property and shall
post a bond to guarantee the full construction of the improvement. The bond amount
shall be determined by the City Engineer plus a ten percent contingency based upon
a report by Kier and Wright. Upon completion of the Barton Road Bridge Removal
and Road Construction Project, the Applicant shall construct the approved ultimate
right of way improvement on Barton Road for the entire frontage.
153. Dedicate sufficient public right-of-way along Barton Road for an ultimate half right
of way width of 50 feet, as directed by the Public Works Division.
154. Depending on the schedule of the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road
Construction Project and this development, the Applicant is required to construct
any interim public street improvements to facilitate both Projects, as applicable, shall
accommodate Barton Road Barton Road Bridge Removal Project timeline
construction activities and provide a temporary 10-feet wide construction easement
for the duration of the Barton Road Bridge Removal Project.
155. The Project shall abide by City of Colton water/wastewater standards.
156. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the
Applicant must sign and return an “Acceptance of Conditions” form. The form and
content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services Department.
Building and Safety
157. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace
Building and Safety Division including the Conditions of Approval contained in the
Building and Safety Memorandum dated November 28, 2023, attached hereto as
Exhibit 1.
158. A building permit shall be required for the development with compliance to the
currently adopted California Building Codes and City of Grand Terrace Municipal
Code.
159. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall pay any associated
Development Impact Fees to the City; this includes but not limited to school fees,
Public Works fees, and outside agency fees including but not limited to Colton
Wastewater, Riverside-Highland Water Co., and utilities. Copies of receipts shall be
provided to Building & Safety prior to permit issuance.
160. All construction Projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems (NPDES), and the San Bernardino County MS-4 Storm Water
Permit.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 28 of 30
161. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall establish haul services for
construction waste with Burrtec to facilitate the recycling of all
recoverable/recyclable material as required per the California Green Code and City
of Grand Terrace Municipal Code. No self-hauling is allowed.
162. The Applicant shall submit a completed Construction & Demolition (C&D) Waste
Diversion Program / Waste Management Plan (WMP) form along with the required
C&D deposit based per square footage of construction and/or demolition prior to
building permit issuance.
163. Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad certifications
shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a
certification for the finish floor elevation and setbacks of the structures. The
certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the Precise
Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. The
certifications are required to be signed by the engineer(s) of record.
164. Trash enclosure shall be accessible and include accessibility for wheelchair access
including a required 60” interior turning radius and accessible side door.
165. Truncated domes shall be placed at pedestrian path of travel prior to entering
vehicular traffic areas.
166. Plans shall comply with the requirements of the 2022 California Building Code,
Chapter 11B for site accessibility and not the ADA. The City of Grand Terrace
Building Division does not enforce the ADA.
167. Separate permits will be required for the following items including but not limited to
signs, new building, trash enclosure, block walls, accessory structures, electric
vehicle (EV) charging stations, loading docks, storage racks, fuel pumps, and any
additional items requiring a permit as per CBC 105.1 and the City of Grand Terrace
Municipal Code.
168. Installation of operating electric vehicle (EV) charging stations shall be provided on
site as required in CGBSC 5.106.5.3.3. prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
169. Installation of an operating roof mounted photovoltaic (PV) solar and energy storage
system as required by the current California Building Code shall be provided on site
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Panels shall be hidden from street
view by the roof parapet.
170. Installation of automatic fire sprinklers shall be equipped throughout the building and
all accessory structures as per Grand Terrace Municipal Code (GTMC) 15.08.030.
171. Wheel stops shall be installed at all parking spaces adjacent to the building and
pedestrian path of travel.
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 29 of 30
172. All employee areas including but not limited to break rooms, restrooms, lounges,
and workspace areas shall be accessible as required in CBC 11B-101.1 unless
exempt as mentioned under CBC 11B-203.
173. Exterior lighting shall be controlled with either an astronomical time clock or
programmed to remain on during hours of building occupancy during evening and
night hours. Lighting shall not be turned off nor programmed by motion sensors
during evening and night hours of building occupancy. Please present compliance
forms for exterior lighting prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
174. Copies of construction and operating permits from exterior agencies including, but
not limited to San Bernardino County Fire, City of Colton Wastewater, Riverside-
Highland Water Company, Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (if applicable),
and San Bernardino County Department of Public Health (if applicable) shall be
provided to the Building Division prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
175. An Automated External Defibrillator (AED), bleeding control kit, and Narcan supply
kit shall be installed in the premises and be easily accessible by staff and the public.
176. The building permit shall be issued after recordation of the lot merger.
177. Only one site address will be issued for the building. Additional addresses will be
issued as necessary by the Building Division.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a public hearing/special meeting held on the 15th day of February 2024.
ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Debra L. Thomas Edward A. Giroux
City Clerk Chairman
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
01247.0001/919526.1 Page 30 of 30
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I Debra Thomas, City Clerk of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024- was duly
passed, approved and adopted by the Planning Commission, approved and signed by the
Chairman, and attested by the City Clerk, at the regular meeting of said Planning
Commission held on the 15th day of February 2024, and that the same was passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
RECUSE: None.
Executed this 15th day of February 2024, at Grand Terrace, California.
___________________________
Debra Thomas
City Clerk
C.1.c
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
2
0
2
4
-
0
1
_
H
i
n
e
s
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
B
l
d
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
IIIIIIII I I c------
1 IIIIf-----
'·I �-I :) ' / I
------= ------
TYP.
I I
,,
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE--..
TYP.
I I I
.,
/
IE 1 '
------------3-16' -9"
TYP
-..... -------·-c:.Jil1;i·1,J R,::�,fli112
SCALE: 1"
---------------------------------------------------�O�V=ER�A�L =L�S�!lE�c,1�., �PL=1A--��--'-,o'�-o.,,....," ®
EASEMENT TABLE 0
LAeEL
<A
B
<C
D
E
F
<G
I H
I J
COLOR CHART
c:i:i=c□:i=c□:i=c□ L.J.LLU.LLU.LLU c:i:i-c□:i-c□:i-c□ ,II II I
.· '"ii ;,/:);•·{ .· / / /.•· •• />
• •
/// /// ,// /// ••.•• /• ' • • • • • •' • • • • •
/ . /0/ // / j��������?;J�t�:
•
, ,,,,
••••
' u,
MULTIPLE�,/·
BENEFITING OR ENCUMBERING EASEMENT TYPE IN FAVOR OF
SOUTHERN SIERRASENCUMBERINGELECTRICAL POWER COMPANY ELECTRICAL' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAENCUMBERINGCOMMUNICATIONEDISON COMPANY COUNTY SERVICE AREA ENCUMBERING SEWERS 70. IMPROVEMENT ZONE H
RUBEN T. LUNA & ENCUMBERING DRAINAGE CHRISTINE I. LUNA
ENCUMBERING WATER CANAL RIVERSIDE WATER CO.FIBER OPTIC/ ENCUMBERING COMMUNICATION AT&T ELECTRICAIJ SOUTHERN SIERRASENCUMBERING COMMUNICATION POWER COMPANY RUBEN T. LUNA & ENCUMBERING ROAD CHRISTINE I. LUNACOUNT OF ENCUMBERING PUBLIC HIGHWAY SAN BERNARDINO
RECORDING DATE RECORDING NO. TITLE REPORT & EXC. NO.
4/22/1912 BOOK 503 PAGE 292 21000111672, EXC. 7 OF DEED. NCS-1105951-0NT1 EXC.11
4/411961 BOOK 5394 PAGE 506 OF OFFICIAL RECORD 21000111672 EXC. 8
4/2/1975 BOOK 8648 PAGE 441 OF OFFICIAL RECORD 21000111672 EXC. 9
3/2/1987 INSTRUMENT NO. 87-67708OF OFFICIAL RECORIDS 21000111672 EXC. 10 BOOK 150 OF DEEDS,21000111672, EXC. 13 2/4/1886 PAGE 347. NCS-1105951-0NT1 EXC. 9INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-4/6/'lfJ07 0401064 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 21000111672 EXC. 39
4117/1914 BOOK 647 OF DEEDS,21000111672, EXC. 12 PAGE 360 NCS-1105951-0NT1 EXC.12
3/2/1987 INSTRUMENT NO. 87-67709OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 21000111672 EXC. 11
5/25/1920 BOOK 685. PAGE 358,OF DEEDS 21000111672 EXC. 6
LABEL
NOT PLOTTABLE
NOT PLOTTABLE
NOT PLOTTABLE
NOT PLOTTABLE
NOT PLOTTABLE
LABEL
R1W
COLOR CHART
COLOR CHART
/:<;;:;;:; ; ; <.·,·:." .
BENEFITING OR ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
PROPOSED
BENEFITING OR ENCUMBERING
ENCUMBERING
EASEMENT TYPE IN FAVOR OF RECORDING DATE
PIPELINES ILLEGIBLE 1/26/1900
PIPELINES RIVERSIDE WATER CO.3/23/1892
PIPELINES RIVERSIDE WATER CO.3/5/1891
CONDUCTING, STORING,SUPPL YING AND
DISTRIBUTING WATER TO RIVERSIDE WATER CO.5/23/1961
PIPELINES ILLEGIBLE 9/23/1903
EASEMENT TYPE
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
� '( 1-lR
l
= 30'-o"
30' 60'
RECORDING NO. BOOK 2B1, PAGE 32 OF DEEDS BOOK 150, PAGE 347OF DEEDS BOOK 126, PAGE 326OF DEEDS
BOOK 5438, PAGE 331OF DEEDS BOOK 333, PAGE 197OF DEEDS
90'
,_'
/
TRUE NORTH
TITLE RIEPORT & EXC. NO.
21000111672 EXC.3
21000111672 EXC. 12
21000111672 EXC.12
21000111672 EXC.13
21000111672 EXC.4
--,
'''
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Address
21801 & 21823 BARTON RD.
GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313
Assessors Parcel Number
1167-121-02
Owner/ Applicant W HGT OWNER IX LP., A DELAWARE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
4000 MCARTHUR BLVD. #100
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PHONE: 949-296-2989
1167-121-03
1167-121-04
1167-121-07
1167-131-011
A PORTION OF 1167-121-08
Zoning Applicant's Representatives
HPA, INC.
18831 BARDEEN AVE.· STE #100
IRVINE, CA 92612
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: INDUSTRIAL
ZONING MAP: MR· RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING
CONTACT: RUBEN CHOI
PHONE: (949)-862-2135
FAX: (949r863-0851
INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPE
PC-Al . l OVERALL SITE PLAN
PC-Al. l C OVERALL SITE PLAN OVERLAY
PC-Al.IF FENCE PLAN
PC-Al.2
PC-Al.3
PC-A2.l
FENCE PLAN
SITE SECTION AND FENCE ELEVATION
OVERALL FLOOR PLAN
PC-A2. l0 OVERALL ROOF PLAN
PC-A3.l
PC-A3.2
PC-Al. l
PC-A4.l
PC-E2. l
EL EVATIONS
EL EVATIONS
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SITE DETAILS
SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
KEYNOTES • SITE PLAN
0 HEAVY BROOM FINISH CONCRETE PAVEMENT.0 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) PAVING.0 CONCRETE WAU<..WAY, MEDIUM BROOM FINISH.
PC-Ll.l
PC-L 1.2
PC-Ll.3
PC-Ll.4
PC-Ll.5
LANDSCAPE PLAN
TREES
SHRUBS
GROUND COVER
ACCENTS
0 DECORATIVE SCORED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER "L"
DRAWINGS.
r;;\ 5'-6"X5'-6'X4' MIN. THICK CONCRETE EXTERIOR LANDING PAD TYP. AT ALL EXTERIOR MAN DOORS
\.::../ TO LANDSCAPED AREAS. FINISH TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH. SLOPE TO BE 1/4": 12" MAX.
PROVIDE WALK TO PUBLIC WAY OR DRIVE WAY W/ 1 :20 MAX. AS RIEQ. BY CITY INSPECTOR.
la\ 8' H PROVIDE METAL, MANUAL OPERATED GATES W/ KNOX-PAD LOCK PER FIRE DEPARTMENT
\.::../ STANDARDS PER DRIVEWAY.0 EXTERIOR CONCRETE STAIR.0 LANDSCAPE. SEE "L" DWGS.
In\ ROOF TOP HVAC UNITS AND/OR GENERATORS TO BE ADEQUATELY VISUALLY SCREENED FROM
� PUBLIC VIEW.@ (2) 6 BIKE RACK TO BE PROVIDED -12 TOTAL0 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER. ADEQUATELY SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW.@ 8' H CONCRETE SCREEN WALL.
� TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE DETAIL B/DAB-A4.1. DRAINS LOCATED INSIDE THE TRASH ENCLOSURE
� ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM PER CITY OF COLTON WASTEWATER
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS.
(iv MODULAR WETLAND SYSTEM(!:) VARIABLE HEIGHT 2'-6" RETAINING WALL I GRAVITY CURB(1v LOCATION OF EXISTING POWER POLE(iv 8' HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
/ 4 11 \ 6' HIGH FENCE WITH GREEN VINES AND DECORATIVE PILASTERS EVERY 15'. SEE SHEETLf DAB-A1.2
(iv CHAIN BLOCK WITH "EMERGENCY VEHICLE USE ONLY" SIGN(2a) EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED(i1_) PROPOSED LOCATION OF LIGHT POLES(!i) EXISTING 7' CONCRETE WALL(i) CONCRIETE WHEEL STOP(24) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
� PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT(2s) 6' HIGH RETAINING WALL WITH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE ON TOP(i) 6'+ HIGH RETAINING WALL(2s) 2" DOMESTIC WATER METER(i) 2" IRRIGATION METER(ao) PIV(i1_) STORM DRAN(32) STORM TECH UNDERGROUND CHAMBER(aa) PROPOSED GRADES. SEE CIVIL(0 PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER
SITE LEGEND
HEAVY BROOM FINISH CONCRETE PAVING.
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC)
PAVING.
STANDARD PARKINGSTALL(g X 19')
ACCESSIBLE PARKINGST ALL (g X 19')
+5' WI ACCESSIBLE AISLE
ACCESSIBLE PARKING (VAN)
STALL(12X 19')
+5' WI ACCESSIBLE AISLE
LANDSCAPED AREA
♦ ■ • • • • • • • •$ PATH OF TRAVEL♦
- • • - PROPERTY LINE
30' WIDE FIRE LANE
LIGHT POLE
Utility Information WATER: ELECTRIC: RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER
COMPANY
12374 MICHIGAN STREET
GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313
PHONE: 909-825-4128
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
26100 MENIFEE ROAD
MENIFEE, CA92584
PHONE: 714-796<!932
SEWER: TELEPHONE:
AT&T CITY OF COLTON
(OPERATOR & MAINTAINED)
160 S 10TH STREET
1452 EDINGER AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR
TUSTIN, CA 92780
COL TON, CA92324 PHONE: 714-227-1431
PHONE: 909-370--6551 GAS:
CABLE:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
7337 CENTRAL AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CA92504
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS
COMPANY
1981 W. LUGONIA AVENUE
REDLANDS, CA 92734
PH:909-335-7583PHONE: 951-406-162
CIVIL
PC-C 1.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
PC-C2.0 GRADING AND DRANAGE PLAN
PC-C2.l
PC-C3.0
INTERIM CONDITION PLAN
GRADING SECTION
PC-C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
PC-C5.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
PC-C6.0 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENTS PLAN
@ PROPOSED SIDEWALK@ BARTON ROAD CL, WIDTH VARIES, SEE CIVIL@ 37 PROPOSED STRIEET WIDENING PER CITY OF COL TON PLAN NO. 1337-1@ PROPOSED WATER LINE. SEE CIVIL@ PROPOSED SEWER LINE. SEE CIVIL@ EXISTING BUILDING PADS
PROJECT DATA
SITEAREA
In s.f.
In acres
BUILDING AREA
Assembly
Office Ground Floor
Office Mezzanine
Assembly Storage
TOTAL
COVERAGE
AUTO PARKING REQUIRID
39 2.771 s.f.
9.02 ao
50,326 s.f.
2.400
2,400
s.f.
s.f.
115.026 s.f.
170.152 s.f.
43.3%
Office @ 11200 s.f_24 stalls
Assembly: @1/500s.f.10 1 stalls
_A=s�se�m=b�ly�S =''=;a�ge�·�@�1�0�/1�.0=0�0 �s =f. _________ �11=5_stalls
TOTAL 240 stalls
AUTO PARKING PROVIDffi
Standard ( 9' x 19·)237 stalls
Van Accessible (12' x 19')2 stalls
OS�"�'�'•�cd�A�c=c�es=s=ibl=e=(9�' ,�1=9�·1 __________ �5�_stalls
TOTAL 244 stalls
TOTAL EV CAF¥\BLE /Q1argers + Supply Equp.) 20% of Total 49 stalls
EV 0-.argers Installed (9' x 19') 25% of Total EV O,pable 12 stalls
EV Supply Equipment Installed (9 ' x 19')37 stalls
Clean Air Vehicle (9' x 19') 12% of Total Parking Stalls 29 stalls
TRAILER PARKING PROVICED
Trailer (10'x53')
BLILDING HBGHT ALLOWED
Minimum Hei;Jhl -35'
MAXIM UM LOT COVffiAGE
Coverage -100'/o
LANDSCAPE PROVIDED
Percentage -
in s.f.
LANDSCAPE REQUIRED
Percentage -
SETBACKS
Front/Street-25'
Interior Side -D', adjacent lo R zone -25 '
Rear -O'. adjacent to Rzone -25'
Parking/landscape -10'
CODE ANAL VSIS:
2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
CODE ANALYSIS· BASED ON 2022 CBC
CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDING
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S-1/8
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 111-B
FIRE SPRINKLERS (AUTOMATIC): YES -ESFR
ACTUAL AREA: 170,672 S.F.
ALLOWABLE AREA(BASIC) S-1 = 70,000 S.F.
B e 76,000 S.F.
60' SIDE YARD WITH 40' AT <75% PERIMITER:
UNLIMITED AREA PER CBC 507
ACTUAL PARAPET HEIGHT: 35'·6' TO 43'·6'
ACTUAL STORIES: 1STORY
ALLOWAELE STORIES: 2 STORIES
stalls
6.8°A,
26 .645 s.f.
5%
hpa, inc.
18831 bardeen avenue, -ste. #100
irvine, ca
92612
1el: 949·863·1770
fax:949•863•0851
email: hpa@hparchs.com
-�O Afi
G Iv
* -2
3-31-25Owner: Hines
Civil:
4000 MacArthur Blvd. #110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: 949-313-2200 Project: BARTON ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT
21831 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Consultants: KIER & WRIGHT
Structural:
Mechanical:
Plumbing:
Electrical:
Landscape: HUNTER LANDSCAPE
Fire Pro1ection:
Soils Engineer: =
Title: Overall Site Plan
Project Number: 22007
Drawn by: DH
Date: 07/19/2023
Revision:
Sheet:
PC-Al.I
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.9
2.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.6
2.0
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.1
1.9
1.6
2.3
2.2
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
2.3
2.2
1.7
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.9
2.3
2.2
1.7
1.1
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.1
1.5
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.2
1.8
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.6
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.3
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.6
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.8
3.6
3.3
2.7
2.2
1.7
1.4
1.1
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.7
2.1
2.1
2.4
2.9
3.5
4.3
5.5
5.3
4.4
3.8
3.1
2.7
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.2
1.0
1.5
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.5
3.3
3.0
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.9
2.5
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.4
1.9
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.4
2.4
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.1
1.5
1.0
1.4
2.2
3.0
3.6
3.9
3.7
3.2
2.1
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.2
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.4
3.5
3.7
3.7
3.4
2.6
1.9
1.2
1.5
2.3
3.4
4.2
4.7
4.6
4.2
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.4
2.7
2.4
4.0
4.2
4.3
3.8
3.0
2.1
1.4
1.5
2.4
3.4
4.3
5.1
5.5
5.6
4.6
4.2
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.6
3.7
4.2
4.5
3.9
3.3
3.0
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.8
3.2
3.7
4.2
4.1
3.5
3.2
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.7
3.1
3.6
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
3.9
3.1
2.2
1.5
1.4
2.2
3.1
3.9
4.8
5.6
4.7
6.9
5.1
3.5
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.5
5.1
7.0
4.6
3.2
2.6
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.7
3.4
4.3
6.5
5.3
3.4
2.8
2.4
2.2
2.3
2.6
3.2
3.8
6.0
2.5
4.3
4.0
3.5
2.8
2.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
2.7
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.6
3.6
3.1
2.5
1.9
1.3
1.2
1.8
2.0
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.6
3.0
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.8
2.4
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.9
3.0
3.0
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.7
3.2
3.3
3.0
2.6
3.2
3.4
3.2
2.7
2.0
1.4
1.4
2.1
2.8
3.4
3.5
3.2
2.7
3.4
3.6
3.3
2.7
2.0
1.4
1.4
2.0
2.8
3.2
3.3
3.1
2.7
3.6
3.6
3.2
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.3
1.9
2.5
2.9
3.0
2.8
3.1
3.8
3.4
2.9
2.3
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.7
2.2
2.5
2.7
2.7
4.5
3.3
2.5
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.8
5.4
3.3
2.4
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.7
2.1
2.5
2.7
2.7
5.0
3.5
2.6
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.9
2.5
2.9
3.0
2.8
4.2
3.7
3.0
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.8
3.2
3.3
3.0
3.9
3.8
3.3
2.7
1.9
1.3
1.5
2.1
2.9
3.4
3.5
3.2
3.5
3.7
3.4
2.7
2.0
1.4
1.4
2.1
2.8
3.3
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.2
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.3
1.9
2.5
2.9
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.3
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.7
2.2
2.5
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.7
2.1
2.5
2.7
2.7
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.9
2.4
2.9
3.0
2.8
3.7
3.6
3.0
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.7
3.3
3.6
3.4
4.6
4.1
3.3
2.7
1.9
1.3
1.4
2.1
2.8
3.4
4.1
4.1
5.8
4.4
3.5
2.7
2.0
1.4
1.4
2.0
2.8
3.4
4.2
4.9
6.0
4.3
3.3
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.3
1.9
2.5
3.2
4.2
6.1
4.5
3.7
2.9
2.4
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.7
2.2
2.7
3.8
5.3
3.7
3.2
2.5
2.1
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
3.3
4.1
3.2
2.8
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.5
3.1
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.5
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.8
2.4
2.8
3.0
2.9
2.9
3.1
3.0
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.7
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.2
2.7
1.9
1.3
1.4
2.1
2.8
3.3
3.4
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.3
2.7
2.0
1.4
1.5
2.1
2.8
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.2
2.6
1.9
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.6
3.1
3.1
2.9
2.9
3.0
2.8
2.4
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.8
2.3
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.7
2.1
2.4
2.7
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.7
2.1
2.4
2.6
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.0
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.8
2.2
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.6
2.2
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.8
2.3
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.2
1.7
1.3
1.6
2.1
2.6
3.2
3.6
4.0
4.2
3.7
3.5
3.7
3.4
3.3
3.4
3.4
4.0
5.1
4.8
3.3
2.6
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.5
3.2
4.1
4.9
5.6
4.8
3.5
2.8
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.8
3.6
5.0
5.3
4.5
3.8
3.4
2.7
2.2
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.5
3.0
3.3
3.5
3.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.3
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.9
3.3
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.0
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.4
2.7
3.0
3.3
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.7
2.3
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.7
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.5
1.9
2.3
2.6
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.8
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.4
1.1
1.5
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.6
1.4
1.1
1.4
1.7
2.1
2.4
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.1
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.7
2.1
2.6
3.1
3.3
3.1
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.7
3.0
3.4
3.5
3.2
2.8
2.5
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.7
3.1
3.4
3.4
3.0
2.6
2.3
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.4
2.7
3.1
3.4
3.3
2.9
2.6
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.6
2.9
3.1
2.8
2.3
1.8
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.7
3.4
3.9
3.3
2.8
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.6
3.1
3.8
4.1
3.3
2.8
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.3
2.7
3.2
3.9
3.9
3.1
2.6
2.2
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.7
3.2
4.0
3.7
3.0
2.5
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.7
3.2
3.8
3.1
2.4
1.8
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.5
2.0
2.6
3.3
3.7
3.1
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.5
3.0
3.7
3.8
3.2
2.6
2.2
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.5
3.0
3.7
3.7
3.0
2.4
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
2.1
2.5
3.1
3.8
3.6
2.9
2.4
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.6
3.1
3.5
3.0
2.3
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.8
2.2
2.6
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.9
3.0
2.7
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.9
2.9
2.5
2.2
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.2
2.6
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.2
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.4
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.4
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.8
2.2
2.3
2.1
2.4
2.0
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.6
2.0
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.4
1.2
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
SA4 @ 27.5'
SA4 @ 27.5'
SA4 @ 27.5'
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'W1 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'
SA1 @ 27.5'
SA1 @ 27.5'
SA1 @ 27.5'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
W3 @ 9'
SA1 @ 27.5'
W3 @ 9'
SA1 @ 27.5'
W4 @ 10'
W4 @ 10'
W1 @ 30'
W2 @ 30'
W2 @ 30'
W2 @ 30'
W1 @ 30'W1 @ 30'W1 @ 30'W1 @ 30'W1 @ 30'
SA4 @ 27.5'
W3 @ 9'
E-2.1
SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1
Owner:
Project:
Consultants:
Project Number:
Revision:
Date:
Drawn by:
Title:
Sheet:
22007
DH
06/8/2022
fax: 949 863 0851
tel: 949 863 1770
email: hpa@hparchs.com
92612
irvine, ca
18831 bardeen avenue, - ste. #100
hpa, inc.
Civil:
Structural:
Mechanical:
Plumbing:
Electrical:
Landscape:
Soils Engineer:
Fire Protection:
4000 MacArthur Blvd. #110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: 949-313-2200
KIER & WRIGHT
-
-
-
-
HUNTER LANDSCAPE
-
=
BARTON ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT
21831 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
PC-
170,152 S.F.
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
PC-L1.1
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
Grand Terrace, CA
22-072
06.07.22
21831 Barton Road
0 20'40'80'
H UNTER ANDSCAPEL
711 FEE ANA STREET
714.986.2400 FAX 714.986.2408
PLACENTIA, CA 92870
N
09.21.22
10.26.22
11.16.22
11.30.22
2.16.23
06.28.23
07.11.23
07.19.23
Southern Magnolia| Magnolia grandiflora
Blue Palo Verde| Cercidium 'Desert Museum'
TREES|2
African Sumac| Rhus lancea Chitalpa| Chitalpa tashkentensis
Brisbane Box Tree| Tristania conferta
PC-L1.2
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
Grand Terrace, CA
22-072
06.07.22
21831 Barton Road
0 20'40'80'
H UNTER ANDSCAPEL
711 FEE ANA STREET
714.986.2400 FAX 714.986.2408
PLACENTIA, CA 92870
N
09.21.22
10.26.22
11.16.22
11.30.22
2.16.23
06.28.23
07.11.23
07.19.23
SHRUBS|3
Pineapple Guava| Acca sellowiana Dward Bottle Brush| Callistemon 'Little John'Sunset Pink Rockrose| Cistus 'Sunset Pink'
Coast Rosemary| Westringia fruticosaAutumn Sage| Salvia greggiiAllen Chickering Sage| Salvia 'Allen Chickering'
PC-L1.3
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
Grand Terrace, CA
22-072
06.07.22
21831 Barton Road
0 20'40'80'
H UNTER ANDSCAPEL
711 FEE ANA STREET
714.986.2400 FAX 714.986.2408
PLACENTIA, CA 92870
N
09.21.22
10.26.22
11.16.22
11.30.22
2.16.23
06.28.23
07.11.23
07.19.23
GROUNDCOVER|4
Dwarf Coyote Bush| Baccaris p. 'Pigeon Point'Yellow Lantana| Lantana 'Gold Mound'Pink Muhly| Muhlenbergia capilaris
Chalk Fingers| Senecio mandraliscaeProstrate Rosemary| Rosemary huntington carpet
PC-L1.4
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
Grand Terrace, CA
22-072
06.07.22
21831 Barton Road
0 20'40'80'
H UNTER ANDSCAPEL
711 FEE ANA STREET
714.986.2400 FAX 714.986.2408
PLACENTIA, CA 92870
N
09.21.22
10.26.22
11.16.22
11.30.22
2.16.23
06.28.23
07.11.23
07.19.23
ACCENTS|5
Soap Aloe| Aloe maculata Red Yucca| Hesperaloe parviflora
Agave Victoria| Agave sp.Agave Blue Glow| Agave sp.
PC-L1.5
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
RI
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
C
A
N
A
L
LANDS OF
LA CROSSE
INDUSTRIAL LP
LANDS OFLAMBERT FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
GRAND MM
DEVELOPMENT LLC
LANDS OF MELINDA
LOUISE FURNAS
LANDS OF
DARWIN FAMILY
TRUST
W-H GT OWNER IX, L.P.
(DOC 2022-0115931)
W-H GT OWNER IX, L.P.
(DOC 2022-0115931)
W-
H
G
T
OW
N
E
R
I
X
,
L
.
P
.
(D
O
C
2
0
2
2
-
0
1
1
6
1
1
9
)
W-
H
G
T
OW
N
E
R
I
X
,
L
.
P
.
(D
O
C
2
0
2
2
-
0
1
1
6
1
1
9
)
LANDS OF
SOCAL EDISON
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
RI
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
C
A
N
A
L
LANDS OF
LA CROSSE
INDUSTRIAL LP
LANDS OFLAMBERT FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
GRAND MM
DEVELOPMENT LLC
LANDS OF MELINDA
LOUISE FURNAS
LANDS OF
DARWIN FAMILY
TRUST
W-H GT OWNER IX, L.P.
(DOC 2022-0115931)
W-H GT OWNER IX, L.P.
(DOC 2022-0115931)
W-
H
G
T
OW
N
E
R
I
X
,
L
.
P
.
(D
O
C
2
0
2
2
-
0
1
1
6
1
1
9
)
W-
H
G
T
OW
N
E
R
I
X
,
L
.
P
.
(D
O
C
2
0
2
2
-
0
1
1
6
1
1
9
)
LANDS OF
SOCAL EDISON
C1.0
TO
P
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S
U
R
V
E
Y
OF 8 SHEETS
SHEET
OF
FO
R
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
JUN, 2022DATE
SCALE
DRAWN BY
JOB NO. A22158
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
,
JMC
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SURVEYOR 000
AS SHOWN
NO
.
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
33
5
0
S
c
o
t
t
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
2
2
Sa
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
9
5
0
5
4
NORTH
NOTES
”
LEGEND
ABBREVIATIONS
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
LICENSE AREA
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
LICENSE AREA
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
RI
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
C
A
N
A
L
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
R
O
A
D
WI
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
FO
R
M
E
R
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
(F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
R
A
I
L
W
A
Y
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
)
10
0
'
W
I
D
T
H
BARTON ROAD
DE BERRY STREET
66' WIDE PUBLIC R/WDE BERRY ST
C2.0
GR
A
D
I
N
G
A
N
D
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
L
A
N
LEGEND
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
NORTH
MATCHLINE SEE LEFT
MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT
18
D
O
C
K
D
O
O
R
S
FF
=
9
6
3
.
1
7
POTENTIAL
OFFICE
FF
=
9
6
4
.
9
5
W-H GT OWNER IX, L.P.
(DOC 2022-0115931)
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
R
O
A
D
WI
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
R
O
A
D
WI
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
C2.1
IN
T
E
R
I
M
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
NORTH
INTERIM CONDITION DETAIL A
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
FF 963.17
FF 963.84
CL R/W
FF 963.78
(FF 957.6+/-)
⅊
ADJACENT
LOT
⅊
FF 964.95
⅊
C3.0
GR
A
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
ASECTION
BSECTION
CSECTION
DSECTION
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
RI
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
C
A
N
A
L
LANDS OF
LA CROSSE
INDUSTRIAL LP
LANDS OF
LAMBERT FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
GRAND MM
DEVELOPMENT LLC
LANDS OF MELINDA
LOUISE FURNAS
LANDS OF
DARWIN FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
SOCAL EDISON
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
R
O
A
D
WI
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
FO
R
M
E
R
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
(F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
R
A
I
L
W
A
Y
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
)
10
0
'
W
I
D
T
H
C4.0
LEGEND
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
NORTH
18
D
O
C
K
D
O
O
R
S
POTENTIAL
OFFICE
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
P
L
A
N
UTILITY KEYNOTES
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
C5.0
BE
S
T
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
BARTON ROAD
BARTON ROAD
WIDTH VARIES
RI
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
C
A
N
A
L
LANDS OF
LA CROSSE
INDUSTRIAL LP
LANDS OF
LAMBERT FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
GRAND MM
DEVELOPMENT LLC
LANDS OF MELINDA
LOUISE FURNAS
LANDS OF
DARWIN FAMILY
TRUST
LANDS OF
SOCAL EDISON
STC
STORMTECH MC-4500 OR SIMILAR
VOLUME PROVIDED = 38,498 CF
361,300 SF - IMPERVIOUS
37,300 SF - PERVIOUS
MWS
DE BERRY ST
C6.0
WA
T
E
R
Q
U
A
L
I
T
Y
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
LEGEND
89
5
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
,
C
A
9
2
6
1
8
Ph
o
n
e
:
(
9
4
9
)
5
0
8
-
0
2
0
2
ww
w
.
k
i
e
r
w
r
i
g
h
t
.
c
o
m
NO
.
AUG 9, 2023
OF 7 SHEETS
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
DESIGNER
JOB NO.A22158
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
BY
W-
H
G
T
O
W
N
E
R
I
X
L
.
P
.
21
8
3
1
B
A
R
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
FO
R
OF
GR
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
DRAWN BY CF
AS SHOWN
JO
NORTH
MATCHLINE SEE LEFT
MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT
PC-
C.1.d
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
l
a
n
s
(
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
2
2
-
0
2
,
S
i
t
e
a
n
d
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
2
-
0
8
,
L
o
t
M
e
r
g
e
r
2
2
-
0
2
,
a
n
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)