Loading...
1991-06 RESOLUTION NO.91 -0 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING Z-89-03 AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (E-89-01) WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Richard Churchwell applied for.an amendment to Section 18.12.040 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code: and WHEREAS, said amendment, Z-89-03 changes the R1-10 rearyard setback requirement to allow 15 feet to have a slope greater than 5%; and WHEREAS, said amendment is attached as Exhibit "A'; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act, and Initial Study has been conducted and a Negative Declaration(E-89-01) has been prepared and is attached as Exhibit "B'; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on December 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of Z-89-03 (with a 10 feet of slope) and its associated negative declaration (E-89-01). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that: SECTION 1. The Negative Declaration (E-89-01), set out in full in attached Exhibit B is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance 'Amendment Z-89-03, amending Section 18.12.040 changing the R1-10 District's 35 ' feet rearyard setback requirement to allow 15 feet of said setback to have a slope greater than 5% set out in full in'Exhibit A is hereby � approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, ( California, at a regular meeting held the 28th day of March, 1991 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Christianson, Hilkey; Mayor Pro Tem Grant ; Mayor Matteson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Carlstrom r c Byro Matteson May r ATTEST Deputy�City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM --." V�A)ft Jo arper, City Attorney TABLE 18.10.040 Site Development Standards ......... .... .............. .......... 92:: . ........ ... Area (Minimum square feet) - a 20, 000 10, 000 7,200 10, 000 12 , 000 Width (Minimum linear feet) • Interior Lot — a 100 60 60 60 60 • Corner Lot — a 100 70 70 70 70 Lot Depth (minimum linear feet) - a 150 100 100 100 100 Street Frontage (Minimum linear feet) - a 50 40 40 40 40 Setbacks (Minimum linear feet)Front Yard b 25 25 b 25 b 25 b 25 Rear Yard 35 b 35 b 20 b 20 b 20 b Side Yard - Interior Lot With Driveway a 10 b 10 b 10 b 10 b 10 b Without Driveway a 5 b 5 b 5 b 5 b 10 b - Corner Lot Streetside a 15 b 15 b 15 b 15 b 15 b Not Streetside a 5 b 5 b 5 b 5 b 10 b TABLE 18.10.040 (Cont. ) Site Development standards rrrr'r''i''r''r'rr rrrrr'r"'r''rrrr rrrrrri r rr� riri Density (Allowable dwelling units per acre) - e 1-2 1-4 1-5 1-9 1-12 Living Area (Minimum square feet) * Single Family - a 1, 350 d 1, 350 d 1, 350 d 1, 350 d 1, 350 d * Duplex, Triplex, Fourplex and Multiple Family One (1) Bedroom - - - - 800 d 800 d - Two (2) Bedroom - - - - 1, 000 d 1, 000 d Height (Maximum linear feet) - a 35 a 35 e 35 e 35 e 35 e Lot Coverage (Maximum percent) - e 40 50 50 60 f 60 f Distance Between Buildings (Minimum linear feet) - a 5 5 5 20 20 Table 18.10.040 Footnotes a. A specific plan shall be required for all proposed projects (including tentative parcel or tract maps) which include any property located within this district. Such a specific plan shall establish site development standards on a project by Table 18.10.040 Footnotes (continued) project basis in consideration of the existing topography and other physical constraints. The specific plan shall not create a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre and shall be consistent with the City' s General Plan. The specific plan may consider a clustered development concept in order to preserve large areas of open space and minimize the project's impact on the physical environment. b. The following exceptions apply to front, rear and side yard requirements as noted: 1) The minimum side and rear yard setback for a patio cover shall be five (5) feet. 2) The minimum rear yard setback for an accessory structure shall be ten (10) feet. 3) Slopes exceeding five percent (5%) shall be permitted no closer to a residential structure than a distance equal to the required side and rear yard setbacks. In the R1-10 District, the 35 foot rearyard setback may include -1-t feet of slope that is greater than 5%. 4) In the case of a parcel or tract map, the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback requirement may range from twenty-two (22) feet to twenty-eight (28) feet, with an average of twenty-five (25) feet for all proposed lots. C. 1) A density bonus of up to twenty percent (20%) may be approved with a conditional use permit or specific plan if various off-site improvements which benefit the general public are included in the project. 2) A density bonus of at least twenty-five percent (25%) shall be approved if the proposed project meets the requirements of Chapter 4.2 of the California Government Code regarding "Lower" and "Low or Moderate Income Households" dwelling units. d. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms shall be defined as follows : "Living area" shall be defined as the enclosed area of a residential dwelling unit, excluding porches, patios, Table 18.10.040 Footnotes (Continued) carports, garages, storage areas, or auxiliary rooms. "Multiple Family" shall be defined as one (1) or two (2) bedroom units only. e. In the R1-7.2 District, accessory structures shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height unless approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board, and in no case shall exceed twenty (20) feet in height. In the R1-20, , R1-10, R2 and R3 Districts accessory structures shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. f. Not more than the permitted percent of the total parcel may be devoted to main and accessory structures, parking areas, driveways and covered patios. The remaining percent of the total parcel shall be devoted to open areas such as landscaping, lawn, outdoor recreational facilities, incidental to residential development, including swimming pools, tennis courts, putting greens, uncovered patios and walkways. Said open areas shall consist of not less than two hundred (200) square feet of open space per dwelling unit. 77-JIN) / t Planning rertrtAc Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-89-Q4 , a tentative tract map subdividing 4 ..9 acres into, 9 single family lots of 10, 000 square foot minimum. This property is located in the City' s R1-10 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation (see attached map) . APPLICANT: '-� Richard Churchwell Owners - N. Stafford and Dorothea G. Cooley LOCATION: 23081 Grand Terrace Road (APN# 276-411-001) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. David Sawyer, Date Community Development Director -" City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 � YHIRIT 14) 824-6621 R CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3 . Date of Environmental Assessment: IQ — z g4` e / 4. Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5 . Name of Proposal, if applicable `�"�'p� — 8c1 - 04 6. Location of Proposal: Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions- or in changes in geologic substructures? V b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? V c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering 'or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? Yes f. Changes in deposition or erosion of - beach sands, or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of.the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 1/ g: :Exposure --of people or property to geologi-c hazards such as earth quakes, Landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air, Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Substantial changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? V c. Alterations to the course or flow / of flood waters? V d. Change in the amount of surface water / in any water body? V e. Discharge into surface waters, or - in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or / turbidity? i/ f. Alteration of the direction 'or rate of flow of ground waters? (/ g . Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or. excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of-Ovate-r oth-erwi'se'•a-va_Tla­b'le for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (.including trees, shrubs, grass, / crops, and aquatic plants)? v b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species / of plants? - c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of. native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- / ment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ' 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic / organisms or insects) ? r/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? i - Yes Maybe No 6-. Noise. Will the proposal result in: / a. Increases in existing noise levels? V b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and .filar.e...- Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 8. , Land Use. Will the proposal result in a Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? V/ 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural . resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (i.ncluding, but not limited to, oil-, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event / of an accident or upset conditions? V b. Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency / evacuation plan? V 11 . Population. Will the ,proposal alter the location, distribution, density,- or growth rate of the -human population of -an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a .demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional / vehicular movement? Yes Maybe _ ___ b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties , or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? VZ d. Alterations to present. patterns of circulation or movement of people" and/or goods? (� e. Alterations to waterborne, -rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles; bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational faci- lities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, / including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15 . Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following - utilities: a. Power or natural gas? V/ Yes Maybe No b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm 'water drainage? f. Solid' waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in. a. . Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to / public view? V r' 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity / of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration -of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site? b. Will the proposal result in' adverse physical. or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, / structure, or object? 1/ c. Does the proposa! have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? V/ Yes Maybe No - - ------------=--------- ------------- d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ` potential impact area? 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment; substa6fially reduce -the --'habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? V b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts -.will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment / is significant. ) V d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, / either directly or indirectly? ✓ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although- the proposed ,project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because 'the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on' the environment, -and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. David Sawyer Planning Director Date rgnature For City of Grand Terrace r III. DISCUSSION OF THE l ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. b, 3 b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the over covering of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department. 6 . a• The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the development of residential uses in an area that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 8 . The existing landuse will . change from vacant land to single family residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan. i n rau T.On or our 1n„er . • I fY Mnl rD NllrfT,r:W NeY y Tfit1TRT/!/�TfiACT,UO. /4483 �,�a.,s I• �e�/aP,vn c I �I �/e11M•AAtl kN'/R / Nlr••.Yl•l•lr.f•rear•f Ya ll•f w,I,a•erw•nra u / /IY/GrrN1VM • i j Ab'A! /� •r rr•.fll•14 W 17•!mp,«ha•10.r.«N,•f b.W«NI«Guar,1 1 4ll Nrrtr _ k.1.1•.le. -00 �1 of I i 1 / U•R C7 rZ.���� R/ 20_q !i. )ruuourue¢e. 1 11a1u-ool S •r• r C r•�~®rINN•..Wr«Ib•r.r«I•r I j I �.\ ,► •''�rz��/ ``4AC ••�. 1•Q 1)wl or.r Trr.r N.r I J 1 "�-•- _ � � LOT I.:/ j I, —+ ,� .�.�� ` �'� 1�!\ Ir•. Irlll at1-••Y �J• A'f/ ✓NCAA/T QS�RII Wrr[.Cfrr..wll :? a LOT J2 r.T[•Yt...r .W., 11141.f,-I111 d'SiQCN f /h• fr• ' -z• I I / `1 1�� #. sot/�,rr�sl�•• �•L'..r 1•/. •°l�• T/' �w/4 �� R/-/O•Q 'C{ '�•. II fCV�r•J ., NJ ,: 1.,1..N.0 w.Yvr•r....w �rb—.,u T111r l { N ��,yr� /Mo//N / / 4.9 1.rr arr -ff�: w •y. ....�� ` - �'O it b. fir/-XT, to eun-m G1e24Y ame .' ` 'I _�` •./Q "Mr'�". /If / 4rrtlf r; uO LL,OI/,rAlr-aae nncY,G�tnc.rn'4®Jel~eor /r7G'I/M.��-1..._•..... - ♦ / r' /r 4M N WWra r.LLNraY Ylr C^ y AAAR i a �^"• �• 111 / j� a« 1 Wal.er uurrW a•r C—, VAtiO.V/• I '+r0 a/e / p ♦ 1 tN �� f rur 1 urrnr-up1W»Yr e•-r•.r R/./p'A cal. a..rr r...... 1 �/ �J♦��\y� Il-ll }y•r 1•lrr•rlF un..Y•1r)1.a•«..rl l.•1•a.r.•�Ir N T 4 AW /� �� C iv r.•r•w1•M Yrw r«.. ai.f/r ex rlosca �r��,,'V / ` �`\� .Y.„1«• 1u1.o1 /!r.'3/LY,Vl/Aa •"►♦rrncl%r.as'ro wl. '"\ 'C��s-t•� / o / / � /� \ � ,?/-/O-R^ roraer F / ., \l ('�\ /' 1V��� /\,�° © rrrra r..r.lu...1.•...mot 1:r..., \•�,• / 1 t/• Fr...r rwHN..r r. u+r 1.r...,u,,r.«)oe",f eu l.l.l r �_�_{ p 'IP/�/D A � ,� ��`�. �'/,i l. �' / �ML. \ d M'� �..N•wrrur c....r. .m.•. 1 � / a• n.u.r..Y rt r I 1�• �� ��t1 el�' // f' Mrti..r•.Ir.lre.Y W lll.a'Y],..r at ul•4)•r p•.sM =1N•f•w••,lwrN•f Iv t r� I ' � G-`^` �� v/�//�/^1\O��/ ,��•� R/_'t 1• yy r f.� •.f lFllr Y r• N rlwr•lM r1,s1.Y Y«r rsF.1 W .,w 1LU7 I. ;• .- 1A�/ / /l'•/' F». •rll..lr1 Y....f]1r, , y NN II y W Nlvrrlr c•rq. [w Iralr t•ra uwN••0.!~i•(r�wr�y"r ``� i i I I Vr1lAN/' •1'i' / �� //7� �/ .\ 1. Nrlr air il...lrarlt•W•.t'-Flit•Y 1••.•!N•a al«r.l e. .f..W,"—ft [w 1 car�i.l]un•u{.l«e'�•ra r•.1 AA!/51 U•1NE � I I .. `f'' / //�� /usrxt/n•,oc Ca, ! LEGCNO 1�7 •ie� �:4' r• / , + r/s / �r...,—� wQrvts a,suao�+vs>•e cx rx.r •r• f m. •{ •.1.� o. I �•�� / f AAWArs ul..a/ta+lirax .,�/ • j__ e� / ///• /r � k'" /acvciify eAHe tlaf 6?Y1.14&y 1 1t' / // / M /acfe.mf ex snA,d]dr/r,)r•l rrr ,� �� M --5-- AVe-'4 -q ff/YiAd 3l UM 4C" % /% / r raacvra axrxvvrcev I LOl'�• // �� • ,a /YSrLY.Yl/.K �' r. /aorucS rivnv�vrrar _lYY/f.91' NNu n eATS crrmvaere/1ra crn.rov • t CwS4V0 ffA/1SLG' CDT 'a• •o ar m cat,' J 0" /nacrnawnMrrncnrfitT>rclsxrrar .•v r re.li �/C/N/TY NAB JFD F � - Of �L Planning No TERRficE Department NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-89-0401 a tentative tract map subdividing 4.9± acres into 9 single family lots of 10, 000 square feet minimum. This property is located in the City's R1-10 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Richard Churchwell Owners - N. Stafford and Dorthea G. Cooley LOCATION: 23081 Grand Terrace Road (APN #276-411-001) Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824- 6621) . Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to January 10, 1989. . All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development Director, City of Grand Terrace. David Sawyer, Date • Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road 0 Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621