Loading...
05/11/2021CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA ● MAY 11, 2021 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road City of Grand Terrace Page 1 PUBLIC ADVISORY: THE COUNCIL CHAMBER IS NOW OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!! Beginning June 15, 2020, the City of Grand Terrace will reopen its public meetings. Therefore, the regular meeting of the City Council for May 11, 2021 is now open to the public. Please be advised that face masks are required, social distancing will be practiced, and occupancy limits will be enforced. Please note that Pursuant to Section 3 of Executive Order N-29-20, issued by Governor Newsom on March 17, 2020, the regular meeting of the City Council for May 11, 2021 will also be conducted telephonically through Zoom and broadcast live on the City’s website. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC The public is encouraged to address the City Council on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council, please complete a Request to Speak Form available at the front entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Speakers physically present and participating via Zoom will be called upon by the Mayor at the appropriate time and each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. If you would like to participate telephonically and speak on an agenda item, you can access the meeting by dialing the following telephone number and you will be placed in the waiting room, muted until it is your turn to speak: *67 1-669-900-9128 Enter Meeting ID: 894 5850 4539 Password: 606775 The City wants you to know that you can also submit your comments by email to ccpubliccomment@grandterrace- ca.gov. To give the City Clerk adequate time to print out your comments for consideration at the meeting, please submit your written comments prior to 5:00 p.m.; or if you are unable to email, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (909) 824-6621 x230 by 5:00 p.m. If you wish to have your comments read to the City Council during the appropriate Public Comment period, please indicate in the Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT” and list the item number you wish to comment on. Comments that you want read to the City Council will be subject to the three (3) minute time limitation (approximately 350 words). Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting. PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 1st Floor Lobby Area and 2nd Floor Reception Area during regular business hours and on the City’s website www.grandterrace-ca.gov. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 824-6621 x230, or via e-mail at dthomas@grandterrace- ca.gov. Any documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at www.grandterrace-ca.gov. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (909) 824-6621 x230 at least 48 hours prior to the advertised starting time of the meeting. This will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. Agenda Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency May 11, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 2 CALL TO ORDER Convene City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived Mayor Darcy McNaboe    Mayor Pro Tem Bill Hussey    Council Member Sylvia Robles    Council Member Doug Wilson    Council Member Jeff Allen    A. REORDERING OF, ADDITIONS TO, OR REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM THE AGENDA B. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent calendar for discussion. 1. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 2. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 04/27/2021 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 3. March 11, 2021 Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes and Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Meetings Update RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK Agenda Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency May 11, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 3 4. Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing the Electronic or Paper Filing of Campaign Statements and Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700) RECOMMENDATION: Direct the City Attorney to read the title for second reading, waive further reading of, and adopt AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.06 TO TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC AND PAPER METHODS OF FILING CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK D. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE G. NEW BUSINESS 5. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Members Resignations and Authorization to Post Notice of Vacancies RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Resignations of Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Members Ann Petta and Shirley Hogue, Direct the City Clerk to Prepare and Send a Letter of Appreciation on Behalf of the City Council and Direct the City Clerk to Post Notice of Vacancies DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK Agenda Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency May 11, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 4 6. Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department to Provide Law Enforcement Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to the City of Grand Terrace RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department to provide Law Enforcement Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract, subject to City Attorney’s approval as to form. DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER 7. Dissolution of the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace and Related Actions RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM 2) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO AGENCY COUNSEL’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE APPROVAL 3) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AFFIRMING AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REPAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION LOAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 AND OVERSIGHT BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 4) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING ITS LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN BY CHANGING THE PROPERTY DISPOSITION DESIGNATION OF A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL USE Agenda Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency May 11, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 5 5) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DECLARING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATED THERETO 6) Adopt RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO SELL THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) 8) Appropriate $144,000 from the Community Facilities Fund to Account No. 19- 190-790-790, and appropriate $5,000 from the Successor Agency. 9) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LAST AND FINAL RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET 10) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REQUESTING THE OVERSIGHT BOARD TO APPROVE THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S REQUEST FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NOTICE TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD PURSUANT TO HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 34187(E)(2), AND MAKING RELATED FINDINGS DEPARTMENT: FINANCE 8. FY 2021-22 Budget Development Guidelines and Budget Schedule RECOMMENDATION: Approve the FY2021-22 Budget Development Guidelines and Proposed Budget Review Schedule DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER Agenda Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency May 11, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 6 H. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL - NONE I. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Jeff Allen Council Member Doug Wilson Council Member Sylvia Robles Mayor Pro Tem Bill Hussey Mayor Darcy McNaboe J. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS K. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE SCHEDULED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Title: City Manager RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION L. ADJOURN The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 6:00 PM. Any request to have an item placed on a future agenda must be made in writing and submitted to the City Clerk’s office and the request will be processed in accordance with Council Procedures. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES ● APRIL 27, 2021 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road City of Grand Terrace Page 1 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Darcy McNaboe convened the Regular Meeting of the City Council and City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency for Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Council Member Doug Wilson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Jeff Allen. Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Darcy McNaboe Mayor Present Bill Hussey Mayor Pro Tem Present Sylvia Robles Council Member Present Doug Wilson Council Member Present Jeff Allen Council Member Present G. Harold Duffey City Manager Present Adrian Guerra City Attorney Present Debra Thomas City Clerk Present Steven Weiss Planning & Development Services Director Remote Robert Eisenbeisz Interim Public Works Director Present Terry Shea Interim Finance Director Present A. REORDERING OF, ADDITIONS TO, OR REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM THE AGENDA None. B. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. C.2 Packet Pg. 7 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 2 C. CONSENT CALENDAR RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Bill Hussey, Mayor Pro Tem AYES: McNaboe, Hussey, Robles, Wilson, Allen 1. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 04/13/2021 APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2021. 3. Approval of the March-2021 Check Register in the Amount of $430,760.27 APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER NO. 03312021 IN THE AMOUNT OF $430,760.27 AS SUBMITTED, FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2021. 4. City Department Monthly Activity Report - February 2021 RECEIVE AND FILE. 5. A Resolution Affirming and Amending the Previously Approved Job Classification and Salary Range Schedule to Add a Senior Management Analyst Position, and Adopting a Job Description for the Senior Management Analyst Position ADOPT “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, SUPERSEDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION 2018-08 BY AFFIRMING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY RANGE SCHEDULE; AMENDING SUCH SCHEDULE TO ADD A NEW CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY RANGE FOR A NEW SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST CLASSIFICATION; AND ADOPTING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION” D. PUBLIC COMMENT Valerie Holmes, on behalf of the Foundation of Grand Terrace and Veteran’s Wall of Freedom, extended an invitation to the City Council to the Memorial Day event to be held on May 31, 2021 at Veteran’s Freedom Park. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. C.2 Packet Pg. 8 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 3 G. NEW BUSINESS 6. Ordinance and Resolution Authorizing the Electronic or Paper Filing of Campaign Statements and Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700) Debra Thomas, City Clerk gave the PowerPoint presentation for this item. 1. INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY, DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY READ THE TITLE, AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.06 TO TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC AND PAPER METHODS OF FILING CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. 2. APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AUTHORIZING THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF STATEMENTS OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS (FORM 700) REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 87200 ET SEQ. AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 87300 ET SEQ. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Doug Wilson, Council Member AYES: McNaboe, Hussey, Robles, Wilson, Allen 7. Status Update on Priority Capital Improvement Program Projects Robert Eisenbeisz, Interim Public Works Director gave the PowerPoint presentation for this item. RECEIVE AND FILE A STATUS UPDATE ON PRIORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Bill Hussey, Mayor Pro Tem AYES: McNaboe, Hussey, Robles, Wilson, Allen This Item is a City Council and Successor Agency Item 8. Dissolution of the Successor Agency and Related Actions Required G. Harold Duffey, City Manager gave the PowerPoint presentation for this item. 1. DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED AND PREPARE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, ANALYSES, AND REPORTS TO COMPLETE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS BY THE CITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY: C.2 Packet Pg. 9 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 4 A. THE SALE OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY HELD PROPERTY (APN 0276-202-54) TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. B. IMMEDIATE REPAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE LOAN OF $885,797 THAT IT OWES TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BY AMENDING THE RELATED LOAN AGREEMENT AS NEEDED. C. IMMEDIATE REPAYMENT OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY LOAN OF $248,636 THAT IT OWES TO THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR BY AMENDING THE RELATED REPAYMENT SCHEDULE AS NEEDED. D. AMEND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S LAST AND FINAL RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION SCHEDULE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE REVENUE REALIZED FROM THE SALE OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY PROPERTY TO THE CITY AND REPAYMENT OF THE LOAN OWED BY THE CITY TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO BE USED AND ANY OTHER NON-OBLIGATED FUNDS HELD BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REPAY THE LOAN OWED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR (WITH REMAINING REVENUE BEING DISTRIBUTED TO THE TAXING ENTITIES). E. ANY OTHER ACTION AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY. F. REQUEST DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ACTIONS BY THE COUNTY-WIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD AND DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND COMPLETION THEREOF AND REQUEST THE FINAL CWOB RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO DISSOLVE CONTINGENT ON THE SAME. 2. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR ITEMS BEFORE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY-WIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD (CWOB) REGARDING THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ITEMS, AS MAY BE NECESSARY, AND TO BEGIN IMMEDIATELY WORKING WITH CWOB AND COUNTY STAFF TO ACHIEVE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY (INCLUDING SUBMISSION OF DRAFT DOCUMENTS AS NEEDED). CITY COUNCIL VOTE RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Doug Wilson, Council Member AYES: McNaboe, Hussey, Robles, Wilson, Allen 1. DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED AND PREPARE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, ANALYSES, AND REPORTS TO COMPLETE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS BY THE CITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY: A. THE SALE OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY HELD PROPERTY (APN 0276-202-54) TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. C.2 Packet Pg. 10 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 5 B. IMMEDIATE REPAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE LOAN OF $885,797 THAT IT OWES TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BY AMENDING THE RELATED LOAN AGREEMENT AS NEEDED. C. IMMEDIATE REPAYMENT OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY LOAN OF $248,636 THAT IT OWES TO THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR BY AMENDING THE RELATED REPAYMENT SCHEDULE AS NEEDED. D. AMEND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S LAST AND FINAL RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION SCHEDULE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE REVENUE REALIZED FROM THE SALE OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY PROPERTY TO THE CITY AND REPAYMENT OF THE LOAN OWED BY THE CITY TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO BE USED AND ANY OTHER NON-OBLIGATED FUNDS HELD BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REPAY THE LOAN OWED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR (WITH REMAINING REVENUE BEING DISTRIBUTED TO THE TAXING ENTITIES). E. ANY OTHER ACTION AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY. F. REQUEST DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ACTIONS BY THE COUNTY-WIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD AND DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND COMPLETION THEREOF AND REQUEST THE FINAL CWOB RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO DISSOLVE CONTINGENT ON THE SAME. 2. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR ITEMS BEFORE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY-WIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD (CWOB) REGARDING THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ITEMS, AS MAY BE NECESSARY, AND TO BEGIN IMMEDIATELY WORKING WITH CWOB AND COUNTY STAFF TO ACHIEVE THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY (INCLUDING SUBMISSION OF DRAFT DOCUMENTS AS NEEDED). SUCCESSOR AGENCY VOTE RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Sylvia Robles, Board Member SECONDER: Bill Hussey, Vice-Chair AYES: McNaboe, Hussey, Robles, Wilson, Allen H. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL None. C.2 Packet Pg. 11 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 6 I. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Jeff Allen On April 21, 2021, Council Member Jeff Allen attended the Solid Waste Advisory Task- Force meeting. To view report, click here. Council Member Doug Wilson On April 8, 2021, Council Member Doug Wilson attended the San Bernardino Valley Water Municipal District’s Advisory Commission on Water Policy. To view report, click here. Council Member Sylvia Robles On April 16, 2021, Council Member Sylvia Robles attended the League of California Cities Revenue and Taxation Policy Committee meeting and discussed the following: • State Budget and COVID-19 Fiscal Impact Update • American Rescue Plan • Legislative Update and Action • Sales Tax Briefing and Discussions To view the PowerPoint presentation from the League of California Cities Revenue and Taxation Policy Committee meeting, click here. Mayor Pro Tem Bill Hussey Nothing to Report. Mayor Darcy McNaboe On April 7, 2021, Mayor Darcy McNaboe attended the Board of Directors Meeting for Omnitrans and the Board of Directors Meeting for the San Bernardino Transportation Authority. To view report, click here. J. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS None. K. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION Mayor Darcy McNaboe recessed the regular meeting of the City Council at 7:45 p.m. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representatives: G. Harold Duffey, City Manager C.2 Packet Pg. 12 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Successor Agency April 27, 2021 City of Grand Terrace Page 7 Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney Colin Tanner, Deputy City Attorney Employee Organization: Teamsters Local 1932 Unrepresented Employees: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Clerk, Director of Public Works, Director of Planning & Development Services, Management Analyst (Two Positions), Principal Accountant, Assistant Planner RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION Mayor McNaboe reconvened the regular meeting of the City Council at 8:33 p.m. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION Mayor McNaboe announced there was no reportable action. L. ADJOURN Mayor Darcy McNaboe adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council and the City Council as the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency at 8:35 p.m. The Next Regular Meeting of the City Council is scheduled Tuesday, May 11, 2021. _________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor/Chair _________________________________ Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk C.2 Packet Pg. 13 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f A p r 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 6 : 0 0 P M ( C o n s e n t C a l e n d a r ) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council Item TITLE: March 11, 2021 Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes and Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Meetings Update PRESENTED BY: Debra Thomas, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #5, Engage in Proactive Communication. BACKGROUND: Beginning with the November 14, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Clerk was directed by the City Manager to provide Council with a copy of the Planning Commission, Historical & Cultural Activities Committee and Volunteer Emergency Operations Committee minutes to keep Council up-to-date on those Commission/Committee activities and on January 16, 2018, the City Manager requested that the Parks & Recreation Advisory minutes be included in the Committee/Commission Report. DISCUSSION: Planning Commission – Nothing to Report. On April 8, 2021, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee held its Regular Meeting and approved its March 11, 2021 Regular Meeting minutes. Those minutes are included as an attachment to this report (Attachment I). The Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee’s next Regular Meeting is scheduled for May 13, 2021. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Meetings Update: As a result of the reopening of the State back in February 2021, staff scheduled the Committee’s first regular meeting of the 2021 calendar year for Monday, April 5, 2021. This meeting was scheduled via Zoom and was to discuss the Committee’s upcoming calendar for the 2021 calendar year. However a member of the committee reached out to the City Manager and requested the meeting be rescheduled due to the Easter weekend holiday. Staff rescheduled the meeting to a special meeting to be held Monday, April 19, 2021. Unfortunately, no member of the committee attended the meeting via Zoom or telephonically, nor was any notification given to the City Clerk’s C.3 Packet Pg. 14 office that no one would be attending; therefore the meeting was cancelled at 6:15 p.m. due to the lack of a quorum. Staff rescheduled the Committee’s meeting to the next regular meeting of Monday, May 3, 2021 and sent notification to all committee members of the scheduled meeting. Staff received notice on April 27, 2021 from two Committee members that they would not be attending the May 3, 2021 meeting. On Monday, May 3, 2021, staff received notification that another two committee members would not be attending the regular meeting of May 3, 2021; therefore the meeting was cancelled at 6:10 p.m. due to lack of a quorum. Staff will schedule the next regular meeting of the Historical & Cultural Activities Committee meeting for Monday, June 7, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: • 03-11-2021 P&R Minutes (PDF) APPROVALS: Debra Thomas Completed 05/04/2021 5:31 PM City Attorney Completed 05/05/2021 10:14 AM Finance Completed 05/06/2021 11:35 AM City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 4:35 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM C.3 Packet Pg. 15 C.3.a Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : 0 3 - 1 1 - 2 0 2 1 P & R M i n u t e s ( C o m m i t t e e a n d C o m m i s s i o n M i n u t e s ) C.3.a Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : 0 3 - 1 1 - 2 0 2 1 P & R M i n u t e s ( C o m m i t t e e a n d C o m m i s s i o n M i n u t e s ) C.3.a Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : 0 3 - 1 1 - 2 0 2 1 P & R M i n u t e s ( C o m m i t t e e a n d C o m m i s s i o n M i n u t e s ) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council Item TITLE: Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing the Electronic or Paper Filing of Campaign Statements and Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700) PRESENTED BY: Debra Thomas, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: Direct the City Attorney to read the title for second reading, waive further reading of, and adopt AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.06 TO TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC AND PAPER METHODS OF FILING CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Our Core Values of Open and Inclusive Government and Goal #5 Engage in Proactive Communication by Develop and Implement a Cost Effective Proactive Communication Program. BACKGROUND At its April 27, 2021 regular meeting, the City Council introduced an ordinance which would add Chapter 2.06 to Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and authorize electronic and paper methods of filing campaign finance disclosure statements. It is recommended that the City Council conduct second reading by title only, waive further reading, and adopt the proposed ordinance (Attachment I). FISCAL IMPACT: The contract with NetFile for the e-filing and administration system for both the campaign and statement of economic interests systems is $3,200.00 per year and will be funded in the City Clerk’s Department budget. ATTACHMENTS: • Attachment I - Ordinance - Electronic FPPC Filings (PDF) APPROVALS: Debra Thomas Completed 05/05/2021 10:17 AM C.4 Packet Pg. 19 City Attorney Completed 05/05/2021 12:12 PM Finance Completed 05/06/2021 11:34 AM City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 4:34 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM C.4 Packet Pg. 20 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.__ TO THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ELECTRONIC AND PAPER METHODS OF FILING CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 84615 provides that a legislative body of local government agency may adopt an ordinance that requires an elected officer, candidate, committee, or other person required to file statements, reports or other documents required by Chapter 4 of the Political Reform Act, except those whose contributions and expenditures each total less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) in a calendar year, to file such statements, reports, or other documents online or electronically with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council expressly finds and determines that NetFile software web-based system, as proposed by the City Clerk, contains multiple safeguards to protect the integrity and security of the data, and will operate securely and effectively and will not unduly burden filers; and WHEREAS, the software used by NetFile's electronic filing system has been certified by the Secretary of State and meets the requirements set by Government Code Section 84615; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk and NetFile will operate the electronic filing system in compliance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 84615 and any other applicable laws. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. New Chapter 2.__ is added Title 2 Administration and Personnel of the Pasadena Municipal Code to read as follows: “CHAPTER 2.__ ELECTRONIC FILING OF CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Sections: 2.__.010 Required Use of Electronic Filing System. 2.__.020 Paper Filing Not Required After Electronic Filing. 2.__.030 Filing Options When a Copy Must be Filed With City Clerk. 2.__.040 Paper Filing When Cannot File Electronically. 2.__.050 Internet Posting of Data. 2.__.060 Records Retention. C.4.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I - O r d i n a n c e - E l e c t r o n i c F P P C F i l i n g s ( O r d i n a n c e A u t h o r i z i n g E l e c t r o n i c o r P a p e r F P P C F i l i n g s - 2 N d R e a d i n g ) § 2.__.010 Required Use of Electronic Filing System. (A) Except as set forth in subsection B of this Section 2.__.010, any elected officer, candidate, committee other person required to file specified statements, reports, forms, or other documents with the Grand Terrace City Clerk as required by Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 84100 of Title 9 of the California Government Code, also known as the Political Reform Act), and that has received contributions or made expenditures of $2,000 or more in a calendar year, may electronically file such statement using the City's online system according to procedures established by the City Clerk. However, to ensure reporting continuity, once a statement, report, form, or other document is filed electronically on behalf of any elected officer, candidate, or committee, all future statements, reports, forms, and other documents filed on behalf of that officer, candidate or committee must be filed electronically. (B) An elected officer, candidate, committee or other person may choose not to use the electronic filing system by filing all original statements, reports, forms, or other documents in paper format with the City Clerk, until such time as the City Council determines that electronic filing is mandatory for all filers. § 2.__.020 Paper Filing Not Required After Electronic Filing. Any elected officer, candidate, committee or other person who has electronically filed a statement, report, form, or other document using the City's online system is not also required to file a copy of that document in a paper format with the City Clerk. § 2.__.30 Filing Options When a Copy Must be Filed With City Clerk. In any instance in which an original statement, report, form, or other document must be filed with the Secretary of State or other agency, and a copy of that document is required to be filed with the City Clerk, the filer may electronically file a copy with the City Clerk, or may file in a paper format. § 2.__.040 Paper Filing When Cannot File Electronically. If, for technical reasons, the City's system is not capable of accepting a particular type of statement, report, form or other document, an elected officer, candidate, committee or other person shall timely file that document in paper format with the City Clerk. § 2.__.050 Internet Posting of Data. The City Clerk shall ensure that the City's system makes all electronically-filed statements, reports, forms, or other documents available on the internet in an easily understood format that provides the greatest public access. The data shall be made available free of charge and as soon as possible after receipt/deadline. The data made available on the internet shall not contain the street name of the persons or entity representatives listed on the electronically filed forms or any bank account number required to be disclosed by the filer. The City Clerk's office shall also make a complete, unredacted copy of the statement, report, form, or other document available to the Fair Political Practices Commission for Government Code Section 87200 filers. § 2.__.060 Records Retention. The City Clerk's office shall maintain records according to the City's records retention schedule and applicable State law commencing from the date filed, a secured, official version of each online or electronic statement, report, form, or other document, which shall serve as the official version of that record. C.4.a Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I - O r d i n a n c e - E l e c t r o n i c F P P C F i l i n g s ( O r d i n a n c e A u t h o r i z i n g E l e c t r o n i c o r P a p e r F P P C F i l i n g s - 2 N d R e a d i n g ) § 2.__.070 Administrative Policies and Procedures. The City Clerk is authorized to adopt such administrative policies and procedures as deemed necessary to implement this Chapter.” SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______________ 2021. _____________________________ Darcy McNaboe Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Debra Thomas City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Adrian R. Guerra City Attorney C.4.a Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I - O r d i n a n c e - E l e c t r o n i c F P P C F i l i n g s ( O r d i n a n c e A u t h o r i z i n g E l e c t r o n i c o r P a p e r F P P C F i l i n g s - 2 N d R e a d i n g ) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council Item TITLE: Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Members Resignations and Authorization to Post Notice of Vacancies PRESENTED BY: Debra Thomas, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Resignations of Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Members Ann Petta and Shirley Hogue, Direct the City Clerk to Prepare and Send a Letter of Appreciation on Behalf of the City Council and Direct the City Clerk to Post Notice of Vacancies 2030 VISION STATEMENT This action supports Our Mission: To preserve and protect our community and its exceptional quality of life through thoughtful planning, within the constraints of fiscally responsible government. BACKGROUND: The Historical & Cultural Activities Committee is a seven-member Committee appointed by the Mayor, subject to City Council approval, and serves four-year terms at the pleasure of the City Council (Municipal Code Chapter 2.16). The terms alternate so that every two years at least two appointments are set to expire. Committee Treasurer, Shirley Hogue submitted her written resignation on April 27, 2021 resigning from the Committee effective immediately. Also on April 27, 2021, staff received a voicemail message from Committee Chair, Ann Petta resigning her position on the Committee effective immediately. The Table below depicts the composition and terms of the Committee: Name Appointed Re-Appointed Term Ends Chair Ann Petta* 05/15/1980 06/26/2020 06/30/2024 Vice Chair Frances Carter 09/27/2001 07/01/2018 06/30/2022 Treasurer Shirley Hogue* 07/02/2018 -- 06/30/2022 Secretary Martha Monteon 01/10/2012 06/26/2018 06/30/2022 Member Rochelle Rosenkild 09/12/1996 06/18/2018 06/30/2022 G.5 Packet Pg. 24 Member Martina Boentaran 07/11/2013 06/30/2020 06/30/2024 Member Lynn Smith 02/25/2020 06/30/2020 06/30/2024 * Resignation effective April 27, 2021. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Government Code section 54974(a), “[w]henever an unscheduled vacancy occurs in any board, commission, or committee for which the legislative body has the appointing power, whether due to resignation, death, termination, or other causes, a special vacancy notice shall be posted in the office of the clerk of the local agency, on either the local agency’s Internet Web site or at the library designated pursuant to Section 54973, and in other places as directed by the legislative body, not earlier than 20 days before or not later than 20 days after the vacancy occurs. Final appointment to the board, commission, or committee shall not be made by the legislative body for at least 10 working days after the posting of the notice in the clerk’s office.” With the resignation of Ms. Petta and Ms. Hogue, the Historical & Cultural Activities Committee will have two (2) regular member vacancies. After acceptance of Ms. Petta and Ms. Hogue’s resignation by the City Council, staff recommends that the City Council direct the City Clerk to prepare and send a letter of appreciation to Ms. Petta and Ms. Hogue and post a notice of vacancy pursuant to Government Code Section 54974. The City Clerk will then begin accepting applications beginning May 14, 2021 through June 11, 2021 from residents who may wish to serve on the committee. The vacancy notice and application information would be disbursed through a press release and posting on the City’s website and reader board. Upon closure of the application process, staff would provide the applications for City Council review at its June 22, 2021. At that meeting, or at a subsequent meeting, subject to the City Council’s approval, the Mayor shall appoint new committee members. FISCAL IMPACT: There would be no fiscal impact created by this action. APPROVALS: Debra Thomas Completed 05/05/2021 11:08 AM City Attorney Completed 05/05/2021 1:02 PM Finance Completed 05/05/2021 3:40 PM G.5 Packet Pg. 25 City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 4:33 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM G.5 Packet Pg. 26 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council Item TITLE: Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department to Provide Law Enforcement Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to the City of Grand Terrace PRESENTED BY: G. Harold Duffey, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department to provide Law Enforcement Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract, subject to City Attorney’s approval as to form. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports the following goals: • Goal #1, “Ensuring Our Fiscal Viability,” through the continuous monitoring of expenditure budgets, allocations, and operational costs; and • Goal #2, “Maintaining Public Safety,” by ensuring adequate staff levels for police services for our Community. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, the City has contracted with the County of San Bernardino for law enforcement services provided through the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department (Exhibit 1 – Original Public Safety Services Contract). Each fiscal year, cities which contract for law enforcement services are required to approve a contract amendment that specifies the level of services for that fiscal year (Exhibit 2 - Schedule "A"). DISCUSSION: As stated in the original 94-797 contract, law enforcement duties to the City shall include: • enforcement of state statutes; • enforcement of city ordinances; G.6 Packet Pg. 27 • traffic enforcement; • specialized enforcement such as arson, homicide, juvenile, and narcotics enforcement; • and attendance at City meetings. These services shall be provided by the County personnel as specified in the attached Proposed Schedule “A.” The City will continue staffing level and hours worked by Sheriff staff as in FY2020-21 as estimated in the table below: Table 1 Personnel Level of Service Hours Per Week Annual Hours Lieutenant 0.21 7.5 390.0 Sergeant 0.90 32.5 1,690.0 Detective 0.56 20.0 1,040.0 Deputy Sheriff 5.76 208.0 10,816.0 Office Specialist 1.26 45.0 2,340.0 Motor Pool Svcs Asst 0.14 5.0 260.0 Dispatchers 0.94 30.0 1,560.0 TOTAL 9.77 348.0 18,096.0 The 28th Amendment to this Agreement (proposed FY2021-22 amendment) updates the cost of law enforcement services that will be provided in FY2021-22 totaling $2,269,316, an increase of $61,324 (2.8%) from the current year’s cost of $2,207,992. The below table shows the final annual contract amounts for law enforcement services over the last five (5) years. Table 2 City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Annual Contract History 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 Final Final Final Final Final Proposed Amount $1,709,111 $1,819,337 $1,941,702 $2,071,535 $2,207,992 $2,269,316 Increase from prior year $110,226 $122,365 $129,833 $136,457 $61,324 Percentage increase 6.449% 6.726% 6.687% 6.587% 2.777% Table 2 above shows that the average annual increase in the law enforcement services contract has been 6.61 percent. Staff believes it will be prudent to budget a proposed 6.61% ($145,948) increase to the Sheriff Department’s contract for FY2021-22 ($2,353,940), instead of the proposed 2.8% ($61,324) increase shown in the attached proposal. G.6 Packet Pg. 28 As this is the County’s proposed amendment at this time, it may be subject to change once the County’s Board of Supervisors have approved the department’s final personnel costs. FISCAL IMPACT: The Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the Agreement for law enforcement services is a contractual obligation of $2,269,316, of which may be subject to change upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. As stated above, City staff will propose a $2,353,940 budget allocation FY2021-22 proposed budget for law enforcement services. ATTACHMENTS: • Attachment 1 94-797 Original Public Safety Services Agreement(PDF) • Attachment 2 - 28th Amendment FY2021-22 (including Schedule A)(PDF) APPROVALS: Terry Shea Completed 05/04/2021 10:26 AM City Attorney Completed 05/06/2021 5:51 PM Finance Completed 05/06/2021 6:19 PM City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 8:22 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM G.6 Packet Pg. 29 G.6.a Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.a Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 1 9 4 - 7 9 7 O r i g i n a l P u b l i c S a f e t y S e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - 7 9 7 G.6.b Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 2 - 2 8 t h A m e n d m e n t F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 ( i n c l u d i n g S c h e d u l e A ) ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - G.6.b Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 2 - 2 8 t h A m e n d m e n t F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 ( i n c l u d i n g S c h e d u l e A ) ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - G.6.b Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 2 - 2 8 t h A m e n d m e n t F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 ( i n c l u d i n g S c h e d u l e A ) ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - G.6.b Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t 2 - 2 8 t h A m e n d m e n t F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 ( i n c l u d i n g S c h e d u l e A ) ( T w e n t y - E i g h t h A m e n d m e n t t o L a w E n f o r c e m e n t C o n t r a c t 9 4 - AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council & Successor Agency Item TITLE: Dissolution of the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace and Related Actions PRESENTED BY: Terry Shea, Interim Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO AGENCY COUNSEL’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE APPROVAL Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AFFIRMING AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REPAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION LOAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 AND OVERSIGHT BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING ITS LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN BY CHANGING THE PROPERTY DISPOSITION G.7 Packet Pg. 41 DESIGNATION OF A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL USE Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DECLARING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATED THERETO Adopt RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO SELL THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276- 202-54) TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) Appropriate $144,000 from the Community Facilities Fund to Account No. 19-190-790-790, and appropriate $5,000 from the Successor Agency. Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LAST AND FINAL RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REQUESTING THE OVERSIGHT BOARD TO APPROVE THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S REQUEST FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE G.7 Packet Pg. 42 SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NOTICE TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD PURSUANT TO HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 34187(E)(2), AND MAKING RELATED FINDINGS 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #1, Ensuring Fiscal Viability by identifying Additional Revenue Sources BACKGROUND: In February 2012, the Redevelopment Dissolution Act (ABx1 26) became effective. Under the Dissolution Act, the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (Successor Agency) was formed and tasked with winding down all Grand Terrace redevelopment activities and obligations. As part of the dissolution the Grand Terrace Housing Authority assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency and became the “Housing Successor.” At this time, the Successor Agency currently holds a property located at 22747 Barton Road with APN 0276-202-54 (Agency Property). Though it is currently listed on the Long-Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP) as recommended to be sold for development purposes, the City desires to acquire the property for General Facility Use, such as a community center or library. The current estimated fair market value of the property is $144,000. Throughout its life, the former RDA loaned various funds to the City. These loans were memorialized pursuant to a loan agreement entered into between the City and the former RDA on April 12, 2011 (City Loan). The City has repaid this loan agreement over the years and currently owes $885,797 on the City Loan. At this time, the Successor Agency currently owes $248,636 to the Housing Successor relating to funds that the former redevelopment agency (former RDA) borrowed from its low-and-moderate income housing fund to pay for the Supplement Education Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to its Resolution No. CRA-2011-06 (SERAF Loan). Pursuant to Successor Agency Resolution No. 2017-01 and original Oversight Board (prior to the formation of the County-Wide Oversight Board, each successor agency had its own individual oversight board) Resolution No. 2017-01, the Successor Agency has repaid this loan over the years at $50,000/year. Additionally, as a result of dissolution and the defeasance of the 2011 Bonds in 2019, the Successor Agency currently holds $482,958 in funds on March 31, 2021. Staff received direction from the City Council and the Successor Agency Board at the April 27, 2021 Meeting to take all actions necessary to dissolve the Successor Agency. G.7 Packet Pg. 43 DISCUSSION: I. Amendment no. 1 to the Loan Agreement Entered into Between the City of Grand Terrace and the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace The City and the former Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency entered into a Loan Agreement dated April 12, 2011 to repay a loan owed by the City to the Former Agency in the amount of $3,389,091 (“City Loan Agreement”). The City has made payments over the years and the current balance is $885,797. As part of the City’s plan to dissolve the Successor Agency the City needs the ability to repay the full remaining amount owed by the City to the Successor Agency. The City and Successor Agency now desire to amend the City Loan Agreement such that the City may determine in its sole discretion to immediately repay the full remaining amount owed by the City to the Successor Agency pursuant to the City Loan Agreement (“City Loan Amendment”). The attached resolution approves the City Loan Amendment. The Chair of the Successor of the Successor Agency is authorized to execute the City Loan Amendment, subject to Successor Agency Counsel’s approval as to form and subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Oversight Board (CWOB) and the California Department of Finance (DOF). The Mayor is similarly authorized to execute the City Loan Amendment, subject to City Attorney approval. If approved, the Successor Agency resolution/action will be forwarded to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”), San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, the Department of Finance (“DOF”), and any other agency as may be required. This requires the approval of CWOB and DOF. II. Amendment to the Repayment Schedule for the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Loan The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (RDA) was dissolved in 2011. The Grand Terrace Housing Authority became the Housing Successor to the RDA and assumed all housing assets and obligations of the RDA pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34176. The RDA borrowed $448,636 from its Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund to pay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (“SERAF”) pursuant to HSC 33690 and 33690.5. Because the RDA did not repay the SERAF Loan prior to its dissolution, the SERAF Loan is an enforceable obligation that the Successor Agency is required to repay. The Successor Agency has been repaying the SERAF Loan pursuant to the repayment schedule. The current balance is $248,636. As part of the process to complete the dissolution of the Successor Agency the Amendment to the Loan Repayment Schedule adds an Early Repayment clause, that gives the Successor Agency the ability to repay the SERAF Loan, or any remaining balance in its entirety so that it may dissolve pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34187. G.7 Packet Pg. 44 The attached resolution affirms and approves this revised repayment schedule, which will have to be submitted to the CWOB and DOF for their approvals. III. Amending the Long Range Property Management Plan The Successor Agency, pursuant to HSC 34191.5(c), prepared and filed with the DOF its oversight board-approved Long Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”). The LRPMP governs the disposition of all real property of the former RDA that is held by the Successor Agency due to the dissolution of the RDA. The property located at 22747 Barton Road is the last remaining property on the LRPMP (“Property”). Its use is currently designated as “future development” property. The City of Grand Terrace desires to purchase the Property for its appraised value and utilize the Property for the potential public use of a library or community center. The Successor Agency desires that the CWOB change the property disposition designation of the Property from “future development” to “governmental use” per HSC 34187. The change proposed for the disposition designation for the Property is subject to the approval of the CWOB and the DOF. Further, by selling the Property to the City of Grand Terrace, the Successor Agency will be able to dissolve pursuant to HSC 34187. The attached resolution would approve the amendment to the LRPMP. IV. Declaring Real Property Located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) as Exempt Surplus Land and Making Findings Related Thereto Under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Section 54220, et seq. (“Act”), surplus real property is defined to include land held in the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund pursuant to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code and land that has been designated in the long-range property management plan approved by the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, either for sale or for future development, but does not include any specific disposal of land to an identified entity described in the plan” Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) of the Act designates certain surplus property as “exempt” from the provisions of the Act, which includes property being transferred to another public agency for its own use. The Successor Agency currently owns real property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) (“Property”). The Property is listed on the Successor Agency’s Long Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”) as “future development” and is, therefore, surplus land as defined by the Act. The City of Grand Terrace desires to acquire the Property for General Facility use, such as a library or community center. Concurrent with this exemption finding, the Successor Agency has approved an amendment to the LRPMP re-designating the Property as “government use” (i.e., public use) in order for the City to acquire the Property for the City’s potential use as a library or community center. As stated above, the Successor Agency will concurrently submit a request to the CWOB and DOF to amend the LRPMP, as provided above, to allow a transfer to the City for the potential governmental use of a library or community center pursuant to the Health & Safety Code. G.7 Packet Pg. 45 The Successor Agency has determined that it is in the best interest of the Successor Agency to transfer the Property to the City for such purpose, the Property is, therefore, “exempt surplus land” as defined by the Act, because the transfer of the Property to the City would serve the public purpose of allowing the City to potentially construct a library or community center. V. Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the Grand Terrace Successor Agency and the City of Grand Terrace The Property is approximately .33 acres near City Hall. As provided above, the Property is included on the Successor Agency’s LRPMP for Future Development, but the LRPMP will be amended to change the Property Disposition to Governmental Use and will be seeking approval from the CWOB for the amendment and sale to the City of Grand Terrace. The City received an appraisal of the Successor Agency property dated April 29, 2021 which valued the Property at $144,000. The appraiser is Integra Realty Resources, and the appraisal report is attached. Per the Purchase and Sale Agreement for Real Property and Joint Escrow Instructions (“PSA”), the Successor Agency, as seller, is required to purchase title insurance and $5,000 is requested to be appropriated from the Successor Agency Fund to pay for this cost. The PSA includes an escrow period of no later than November 30, 2021, and gives the Executive Director of the Successor Agency (Seller) and the City Manager of the City (Buyer) the authority, in their sole discretion, to execute any extensions of required dates and/or minor modifications to the Agreement which do not materially adversely affect the parties’ obligations. The proceeds of this sale will go the Successor Agency Fund. The intent is to seek approval to utilize these funds to pay off any Successor Agency debts with the excess being distributed to ATE’s. The Buyers obligation to purchase the Property are subject to and expressly conditioned upon satisfaction (or written waiver) by Buyer of the following conditions precedent to the Closing: i. As of the Closing Date, the Title Company will issue the Title Policy in accordance with Section 6.2 of the PSA. ii. If applicable, the CWOB and the DOF have approved this transaction. iii. Seller is not in material breach of its obligations in the PSA. The seller’s obligation to sell the Property are subject to and expressly conditioned upon satisfaction (or written waiver) by Buyer of the following conditions precedent to the Closing: i. As of the Closing Date, the Title Company will issue the Title Policy in accordance with Section 6.2 of the PSA. ii. The California Department of Housing and Community Development does not object to the Exempt Surplus Property resolution (see above). iii. If applicable, the CWOB and the DOF have approved this transaction. iv. The DOF has approved all applications submitted by seller related to the dissolution of seller as successor agency except for applications made under Health & Safety Code Section 34187. v. Escrow holds the balance of the Purchase Price and will deliver same to seller. G.7 Packet Pg. 46 vi. Buyer is not in material breach of its obligations under the PSA. VI. Approving Second Amendment to the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget The San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) approved the Successor Agency’s Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPS”) and, pursuant to HSC 34191.6, the Last & Final ROPS that was approved by Department of Finance (“DOF”) by letter dated August 6, 2018. The CWOB approved a first amendment to the Last & Final ROPS, which was approved by the DOF by letter dated October 3, 2019 (revised). Upon the CWOB approval and DOF approval of the SERAF Loan Amendment, the City Loan Amendment, and the PSA, the Successor Agency desires to utilize the funds that would be received from the City’s repayment of the City Loan Agreement and the sale of the property to the City pursuant to the PSA, and any Successor Agency-held funds to repay the SERAF Loan in full with any remaining funds being distributed to the affected taxing entities. To be able to complete the above-mentioned payments and transactions, the Successor Agency’s Last & Final ROPS must be amended a second time. HSC 34191.6(c)(2)(A) allows successor agencies to submit two (2) amendment requests of the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPs”) to DOF, after such request is reviewed and approved by the CWOB. HSC 34177 requires the CWOB to approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) and administrative budget. The Successor Agency in order to evaluate the most efficient, practical and financially responsible expenditure of the moneys held by the Successor Agency, the Successor Agency has retained certain legal and financial advisors to evaluate the potential dissolution of the Successor Agency by the sale of the Property to the City and repayment of the City Loan by the City and, further, to use such funds generated by such loan repayment and such property sale and other Successor Agency-held funds to repay the entirety of the SERAF Loan for the ultimate goal of dissolving the Successor Agency pursuant to HSC 34187. Based on such evaluation and the advice of such legal and financial advisors, the Successor Agency has determined that it is to the benefit of the relevant affected taxing entities to (i) Approve the SERAF Loan Amendment; (ii) Approve the City Loan Amendment; (iii) Approve the PSA and sale of the Property to the City; (iv) Amend the Last & Final ROPs to reflect the use of the funds generated from the repayment of the City Loan, the PSA, and any other Successor Agency-held funds to make full payment upon the SERAF Loan so that the Successor Agency may dissolve pursuant to HSC G.7 Packet Pg. 47 34187. The Last and Final ROPS also includes a budget of $250,000 for administrative costs associated with dissolution of the Successor Agency. The approval of the Last and Final ROPS and the carrying out of the payments and transactions will allow the Successor Agency to be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187. VII. Dissolution of the Successor Agency Upon the CWOB’s approval and DOF’s approval of the SERAF Loan Amendment, the City Loan Amendment, and the PSA, the Successor Agency desires to utilize the funds that would be received from the City’s repayment of the City Loan Agreement and the sale of the property to the City pursuant to the PSA, and any Successor Agency-held funds to repay the SERAF Loan with any remaining funds being transferred to the affected taxing entities. The completion of these activities will allow the Successor Agency to be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187. HSC 34191.6(c)(2)(A) allows successor agencies to submit two (2) amendment requests of the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPs”) to the CWOB and DOF. The Successor Agency amended its Last & Final ROPS a second time, which will be concurrently submitted to the CWOB along with the above-mentioned items. With the approval of the Last & Final ROPS and the carrying out of the payments and transactions, the Successor Agency will carry out the contemplated actions and be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187 as follows: A. All enforceable obligations have been retired or paid off, as applicable. Upon approval of both the City Loan Amendment, the PSA, SERAF Loan Amendment, Last & Final ROPS, it is anticipated that the City will immediately repay the balance of the City Loan and the Successor Agency will immediately transfer the Property to the City pursuant to the PSA. Revenue generated and any Successor Agency-held funds would then be used to repay the SERAF Loan, which is the Successor Agency’s remaining enforceable obligation. Any remaining funds would then be transferred to the affected taxing entities pursuant to law; and B. All real property has been disposed of pursuant to Section 34181 or 34191.4. Upon approval of the PSA, the final Successor Agency property will be transferred to the City pursuant to the PSA; and C. All outstanding litigation has been resolved. There is no outstanding litigation for the Successor Agency. Upon completing the above tasks, the Successor Agency is required to submit a request for dissolution to the CWOB pursuant to HSC 34187, which is subject to approval by the DOF. If that request is approved the Successor Agency will be required to complete the final acts of dissolution within 100 days of DOF’s approval of the G.7 Packet Pg. 48 request. Once that is complete, the Successor Agency must then notify the CWOB of its completing such acts and request a final dissolution resolution from the CWOB. Therefore, upon approval of the resolutions attached to this report, Successor Agency staff will request that the CWOB contingently approve the Successor Agency’s request for dissolution and contingently approve the final dissolution resolution. The attached Successor Agency resolution requests that the CWOB authorize the Successor Agency to take any and all actions necessary to dissolve the Successor Agency. The request seeks an approval that is contingent upon each of the following conditions being met: A. The CWOB and the DOF have approved the City Loan Amendment. B. The CWOB and DOF have approved the change in the property disposition designation for the Property from “future development” to “government use” and have approved the PSA. C. The Property is transferred to the City from the Successor Agency pursuant to the terms of the PSA. D. The CWOB and the DOF have approved the SERAF Loan Amendment. E. The CWOB and DOF have approved the second amendment to the Last & Final ROPS such that the Successor Agency is able to utilize the funds realized from the City Loan and PSA, and any remaining Successor Agency-held funds to fully repay the SERAF Loan. F. The City Loan and SERAF Loan has been fully repaid. VIII. Dissolved Successor Agency According to the DOF’s website, once all enforceable obligations have been retired or paid off, all passthrough payment obligations or any passthrough agreement between the former RDA and the various taxing entities that was entered into prior to January 1, 1994, shall cease, and no property tax shall be allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund for the Successor Agency. When the Successor Agency is dissolved, all the tax sharing agreements and passthrough distributions would be eliminated and the property tax distributions would go back to the normal distribution formula for the incremental growth in value. Included in the Attachments is a Report named Grand Terrace – Avg Basic Rates prepared by our Consultants HdL Coren & Cone, which shows the Property Tax Revenues for each affected Agency calculated as if the RDAs no longer existed. This represents each Agency’s share of the 1% of the assessed valuation. The City of Grand Terrace’s projected General Fund share is $2,410,239. G.7 Packet Pg. 49 The City receives several different types of Property Taxes and total amount projected for FY 2020-21 is $3,240,197, which is less than the FY 2019-20 actual amounts received, due to a change in the RPTTF Residual Allocation Methodology Change by the County due to the City of Chula Vista Vs. Sandoval court decision. Please see the attachment General Fund Property Tax Comparisons, this schedule includes the actual amounts for FY 2018-19 and FY 2019-20, Projected amounts for FY 2020-21 as well projections for FY 21-22 with the Successor Agency being dissolved. There is a projected increase of approximately $750,000 in Property Tax Revenues over FY 2020- 21. Included on Amendment No. 2 to Last & Final ROPS is $250,000 for administrative fees for the Successor Agency. Therefore, the City Council and Successor Agency are recommended to approve the attached resolutions and Agreements. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City chooses to repay the full remaining amount owed the fiscal impact to the General Fund would be $885,797, which will be offset by the General Funds share of the repayment of $177,160 for a net decrease of $708,337. For the repayment of the SERAF Loan the Housing Authority Fund will receive $248,636. The Community Facilities Fund will have an expenditure of $144,000 for the purchase of the property. The Successor Agency will have an expenditure of $5,000 for Title Insurance Costs. ATTACHMENTS: • 0001A - CC Resolution for Amendment of City SA Loan (DOCX) • 0001B - SA Resolution for Amendment of City SA Loan (DOCX) • 0001C - EXHIBIT A - Amendment to City SA Loan (DOCX) • 0002A - SA Resolution amending SERAF Repayment Schedule(DOCX) • 0002B - EXHIBIT A Amendment to SERAF Repayment Schedule(DOCX) • 0003A - SA Resolution for Amending LRPMP v2 (DOCX) • 0003B - SA Resolution for Finding Exempt Surplus v3 (DOCX) • 0003C - SA Resolution for Approving PSA v3 (DOCX) • 0003D - CC Resolution for Approving PSA v3 (DOCX) • 0003E - Attachment A - PSA v3 (DOCX) • 0004 - SA Resolution for Amendment No. 2 to the Last & Final ROPS v2 (DOCX) • Last & Final ROPS Amendment No. 2 (PDF) • DOF Email Regarding SA Dissolution (PDF) • 0005 - SA Resolution for Request to OB for Dissolution (DOCX) • City_CRA - Loan Agreement (PDF) • Integra Appraisal - 22747 Barton Rd (PDF) G.7 Packet Pg. 50 • 2017-01 SA Resolution - SERAF Loan Repayment Schedule (PDF) • GRAND TERRACE - Avg Basic Rates (PDF) • General Fund Property Tax Comparisons (PDF) • Successor Agency Tabulation of RPTTF Allocations (PDF) APPROVALS: Terry Shea Completed 05/06/2021 11:29 AM City Attorney Completed 05/06/2021 8:49 PM Finance Completed 05/06/2021 8:50 PM City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 8:51 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM G.7 Packet Pg. 51 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (the “Successor Agency”) to the prior Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace (“City”) currently owes approximately $885,797 to the Successor Agency pursuant to a Loan Agreement memorializing such loan dated April 12, 2011 (“City Loan Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the option to repay the loan it owes, or any remaining balances, pursuant to the City Loan Agreement in its entirety in order to assist the Successor Agency in its dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, based upon the forgoing, the City and Successor Agency desire to amend the City Loan Agreement as provided in this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Approval. The amendment to the City Loan Agreement is approved substantially in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A” (“City Loan Amendment”). The Mayor is authorized to execute the City Loan Amendment, subject to the City Attorney’s approval as to form. Section 3. Official Action. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the City, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution. This includes, but is not limited, any amendments to this Resolution and its exhibits in order to conform with any requirements of the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board, California Department of Finance, and any other applicable agency. G.7.a Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 A - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Section 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City Council declares that the City Council would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. In the event that the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board or California Department of Finance do not approve the City Loan Amendment, then this Resolution shall be ineffective. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, City Attorney G.7.a Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 A - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Exhibit A City Loan Amendment G.7.a Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 A - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DATED APRIL 12, 2011 AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD TO EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT SUBJECT TO AGENCY COUNSEL’S APPROVAL AS TO FORM AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE APPROVAL WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (the “Successor Agency”) to the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace (“City”) currently owes approximately $885,797 to the Successor Agency pursuant to a Loan Agreement memorializing such loan dated April 12, 2011 (“City Loan Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the option to repay the loan it owes, or any remaining balances, pursuant to the City Loan Agreement in its entirety in order to assist the Successor Agency in its dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, based upon the forgoing, the City and Successor Agency desire to amend the City Loan Agreement as provided in this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Approval. The amendment to the City Loan Agreement is approved substantially in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A” (“City Loan Amendment”). The Chair of the Successor Agency is authorized to execute the City Loan Amendment, subject to the Successor Agency Counsel’s approval as to form and subject to approval by the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”). Section 3. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the San G.7.b Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 6 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”), San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, the California Department of Finance, and any other agency as may be required. The Executive Director is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution and its exhibits to comply with the requirements set forth by the CWOB, California Department of Finance, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency. Section 4. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby further authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution. Section 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.b Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 6 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 G.7.b Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 6 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Exhibit A City Loan Amendment G.7.b Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t o f C i t y S A L o a n [ R e v i s i o n 6 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0001/515555.1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE This AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the LOAN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation (“City”) and the SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (“Successor Agency”) is effective as of the ______ day of ______, 2021. RECITALS A. The City and the former Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency (“Former RDA”) entered into a Loan Agreement dated April 12, 2011, to repay a loan owed by the City to the Former RDA in the amount of $3,338,091.00 (“City Loan Agreement”). B. The Former RDA was dissolved in 2011 and the Successor Agency is the successor- in-interest to the City Loan Agreement pursuant to the Health & Safety Code. C. Over the years, the City has made payments pursuant to the City Loan Agreement. C. The City currently owes a remaining balance of approximately $885,797 on the City Loan Agreement. D. The City and Successor Agency now desire to amend the City Loan Agreement such that the City may determine in its sole discretion to repay the full remaining amount owed by the City to the Successor Agency pursuant to the City Loan Agreement. TERMS 1. Amendments. The Agreement is amended as provided herein 1.1 Section 3 of the City Loan Agreement is hereby amended as follows (strikethrough represented deleted text while bold italics representing added text): “Subject to the restrictions contained in Paragraph 2 above, the City hereby agrees to repay the Agency the amount of the Loan by making annual installment payments of $147,308.30, beginning July 1, 2012. The payment of said amount is contingent upon a determination by the City Council that it has sufficient funds therefore, on an annual basis. The Parties acknowledge that should such funds not be available in any fiscal year, the City shall make a payment in the amount the City is able to pay as determined by the City Council. The Loan shall be repaid in full on or before July 1, 2034. The Parties further agree that it is to the Parties’ mutual benefit G.7.c Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 C - E X H I B I T A - A m e n d m e n t t o C i t y S A L o a n ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0001/515555.1 that interest shall not accrue on any remaining Loan balance. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without penalty, immediately pay the full amount of the Loan or any remaining balance thereof at any time.” 2. Continuing Effect of City Loan Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the City Loan Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, whenever the term “Loan Agreement” appears in the City Loan Agreement, it shall mean the City Loan Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1. 3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Successor Agency each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the City Loan Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the City Loan Agreement other than as provided herein. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the City Loan Agreement is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation. Successor Agency represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, City is not in default of any material term of the City Loan Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the City Loan Agreement. City represents and warrants to Successor Agency that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, Successor Agency is not in default of any material term of the City Loan Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the City Loan Agreement. 4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 1. 5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of the Agreement, as amended and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.7.c Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 C - E X H I B I T A - A m e n d m e n t t o C i t y S A L o a n ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0001/515555.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. __ on the date and year first-above written. CITY: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ Adrian Guerra, City Attorney SUCCESSOR AGENCY: SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: _____________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel [END SIGNATURES] G.7.c Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 1 C - E X H I B I T A - A m e n d m e n t t o C i t y S A L o a n ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AFFIRMING AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REPAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION LOAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 AND OVERSIGHT BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2017-01 WHEREAS, Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (“RDA”) was dissolved in 2011; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (“Successor Agency”) to the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the Grand Terrace Housing Authority became the Housing Successor to the RDA and assumed all housing assets and obligations of the RDA pursuant to HSC 34176 (“Housing Successor”); and WHEREAS, the RDA borrowed $448,636 from its Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to pay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (“SERAF”) pursuant to HSC 33690 and 33690.5 (“SERAF Loan”); and WHEREAS, because the RDA did not repay the SERAF Loan prior to its dissolution, the SERAF Loan is an enforceable obligation that the Successor Agency is required to repay to the Housing Successor; and WHEREAS, HSC 34171(d)(1)(G) and 34176(e) requires repayment of the SERAF Loan to the Housing Successor provided that the Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion and provided that a repayment schedule is approved by the Oversight Board; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion from the California Department of Finance on May 9, 2013 pursuant to HSC 34191.4(b); and WHEREAS, the SERAF Loan repayment schedule was approved by the Successor Agency on January 10, 2017, pursuant to its Resolution No. 2017-01, and the Successor Agency’s original oversight board on January 18, 2017 pursuant to its Resolution No. 2017-01; and G.7.d Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 2 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n a m e n d i n g S E R A F R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has been repaying SERAF Loan pursuant to the aforementioned repayment schedule and currently owes $248,636 to the Housing Successor; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency desires to amend the SERAF Loan’s repayment schedule, as approved and described above, in order to give it the option to pay off the entirety of the SERAF Loan, or any remaining balances, such that the Successor Agency may dissolve pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34187; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency therefore desires to affirm and amend the SERAF Loan repayment schedule as provided in Successor Agency Resolution No. 2017-01 and Oversight Board Resolution No. 2017-01. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. SERAF Loan as Enforceable Obligation. The City as Successor Agency affirms and finds that the SERAF Loan repayment schedule, attached hereto as Attachment A, is true and correct and, accordingly, is hereby considered an enforceable obligation (“SERAF Loan Repayment Schedule”). Section 3. Approval of Amendment. Pursuant to HSC 34177, the City as Successor Agency hereby affirms, amends, approves, and adopts the SERAF Loan Repayment Schedule in substantially the same form as shown in Attachment A. Section 4. Non-Substantive Changes. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution or the SERAF Loan Repayment Schedule, as attached hereto, which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. Section 5. Prior Resolution Superseded. Successor Agency Resolution No. 2017-01 is hereby superseded to the extent that such resolution conflicts with this Resolution. Section 6. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”), San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, the California Department of Finance, and any other agency as may be required. The Executive Director is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution and its exhibits to comply with the requirements set forth by the CWOB, G.7.d Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 2 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n a m e n d i n g S E R A F R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 California Department of Finance, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency. Section 7. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby further authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate this Resolution. Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.d Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 2 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n a m e n d i n g S E R A F R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Attachment A G.7.d Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 2 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n a m e n d i n g S E R A F R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) ATTACHMENT A SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (SERAF) Loan Repayment Schedule A. Repayment Schedule. Except as provided in Section B below, the Successor Agency will repay the SERAF Loan pursuant to the following schedule: Pymt No. Payment Date Beginning Balance Scheduled Payment Principal Interest Ending Balance 1 1/15/2018 $448,636 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $398,636 2 1/15/2019 398,636 50,000 50,000 0 348,636 3 1/15/2020 348,636 50,000 50,000 0 298,636 4 1/15/2021 298,636 50,000 50,000 0 248,636 5 1/15/2022 248,636 50,000 50,000 0 198,636 6 1/15/2023 198,636 50,000 50,000 0 148,636 7 1/15/2024 148,636 50,000 50,000 0 98,636 8 1/16/2025 98,636 50,000 50,000 0 48,636 9 1/17/2026 48,636 48,636 48,636 0 0 TOTAL $448,636 B. Early Repayment. Notwithstanding Section A, the Successor Agency may immediately repay the SERAF Loan, or any remaining balance, in its entirety so that it may dissolve pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34187. G.7.e Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 2 B - E X H I B I T A A m e n d m e n t t o S E R A F R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING ITS LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN BY CHANGING THE PROPERTY DISPOSITION DESIGNATION OF A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL USE WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (“Successor Agency”) to the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (“RDA”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC 34191.5(c), the Successor Agency prepared and filed with the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) its oversight board-approved Long Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”); and WHEREAS, the LRPMP governs the disposition of all real property of the RDA that is held by the Successor Agency due to the dissolution of the RDA; and WHEREAS, the LRPMP includes a property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54), which is currently designated as “future development” (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace desires to purchase and utilize the property for the public use of either a library or community center; and WHEREAS, based on the forgoing, the Successor Agency desires that the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) change the property disposition designation of the Property from “future development” to “governmental use” pursuant to HSC 34181(a); and WHEREAS, by selling the Property to the City of Grand Terrace, the Successor Agency will be able to dissolve pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, the change proposed by this Resolution for the property disposition designation for the Property is subject to the approval of the CWOB and the DOF. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: G.7.f Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d i n g L R P M P v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into herein by this reference. Section 2. Approval. The Successor Agency hereby approves the change in property disposition designation for the Property on the LRPMP from “future development” to “governmental use”. Section 3. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the CWOB, San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor- Controller, the California Department of Finance, and any other agency as may be required. The Executive Director is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution and its exhibits to comply with the requirements set forth by the CWOB, California Department of Finance, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency. Section 4. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution. Section 5. Non-Substantive Changes. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. Section 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. In the event that the DOF disapproves of CWOB Resolution Nos. [insert resolution numbers for the following resolutions: City Loan Amendment; SERAF Repayment Schedule Loan Amendment; Approving PSA; Approving Amendment 2 of Last & Final ROPS] or if any of such resolutions become ineffective by their terms, then this resolution shall not take effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair G.7.f Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d i n g L R P M P v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.f Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 A - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d i n g L R P M P v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DECLARING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Section 54220, et seq. (“Act”), surplus real property is defined to include land “held in the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund pursuant to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code and land that has been designated in the long-range property management plan approved by the California Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, either for sale or for future development, but does not include any specific disposal of land to an identified entity described in the plan”; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) of the Act designates certain surplus property as “exempt” from the provisions of the Act, which includes property being transferred to another public agency for agency use (as defined therein); and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency currently owns real property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) (“Property”) as legally described in Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the Property is listed on the Successor Agency’s Long Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”) as “future development” and is, therefore, surplus land as defined by the Act; and WHEREAS, the City desires to acquire the Property for the City’s potential use for a library or community center; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has approved an amendment to the LRPMP re-designating the Property as “government use” (i.e., public use) in order for the City to acquire the Property for the City’s potential use as a library or community center; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency will or has submitted a request to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) and California Department of Finance (“DOF”) to amend the LRPMP, as provided above, to allow a transfer to the City for the potential government use of library or community center pursuant to the Health & Safety Code; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has determined that it is in the best interest of the Successor Agency to transfer the Property to the City for such purpose; and G.7.g Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r F i n d i n g E x e m p t S u r p l u s v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 WHEREAS, based on the forgoing, the Property is, therefore, “exempt surplus land” as defined by the Act, because transfer of the Property to the City would serve the public purpose of allowing the City to potentially construct a library or community center; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency now desires to declare the Property exempt surplus land and authorize transfer of the Property to the City subject to the approval by the CWOB and DOF. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. Exempt Surplus Land. Based on the above recitals, the Successor Agency finds and declares (i) the Property is surplus because it is listed on the LRPMP; (ii) the Property is exempt surplus land pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) because it will be transferred to the City for the City’s potential use as a library or community center; and (iii) other related provisions of the Act are not applicable pursuant to Government Code Section 54222.3. Section 3. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution. This includes, but is not limited, any amendments to this Resolution in order to conform with applicable law. Section 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. G.7.g Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r F i n d i n g E x e m p t S u r p l u s v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.g Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 B - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r F i n d i n g E x e m p t S u r p l u s v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO SELL THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, the Successor Agency currently owns real property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) (“Property”) as legally described in Exhibit “A” of the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (“PSA”); and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has declared the Property as exempt surplus property under the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D)); and WHEREAS, under the PSA, the City of Grand Terrace will purchase the Property for $144,000 which is the appraised fair market value of the Property; and WHEREAS, upon adoption of this Resolution, the parties will open escrow with the close of escrow being subject to the approval of the San Bernardino County-Wide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) as may be required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. CEQA. Based upon the forgoing and written and oral presentations made by Successor Agency staff and members of the public, the Successor Agency hereby finds that the purchase and sale of the Property from the Successor Agency to the City as contemplated by this Resolution is not subject to environmental review pursuant to CEQA Regulations Section 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 (b) (5) - Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Further, even if it is a project, this action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (when it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that an action will have a significant effect on the environment, that activity is not subject to CEQA). The purchase and sale of the Property will not have any effect on the environment. Ownership will change; however, no physical changes are proposed or G.7.h Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 C - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 authorized with the purchase and sale. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility of significant environmental effects and the purchase and sale is not subject to CEQA. Any use (such as any potential use as library or community center) as determined by the City Council would be subject to a separate discretionary action and CEQA compliance review at that time. The full extent of the future use, design, and operations of the Property are speculative at this point and are therefore not yet ripe for evaluation. Potential environmental impacts will be evaluated at the time the City Council considers establishing the specific use for the Property. Section 3. Approval. The Successor Agency hereby approves the Purchase and Sale Agreement for Real Property and Joint Escrow Instructions in substantially the form attached hereto as Attachment “A” of this Resolution (“PSA”). The Chair of the Successor Agency is authorized to execute the PSA, subject to the Successor Agency Counsel’s approval as to form. Section 4. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed (i) to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the San Bernardino County-Wide Oversight Board (“CWOB”), San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, DOF, and any other agency as may be required; (ii) to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code includes, but is not limited to, the requirements set forth by the CWOB, DOF, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency; (iii) to execute all documents necessary and appropriate to consummate the transaction under the PSA; and (iv) make any amendments to this Resolution and its attachments in order to conform with any requirements of the CWOB, DOF, and any other applicable agency. Section 5. Authorized Actions. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution, which includes, but is not limited to, authorization to the Executive Director to execute all documents necessary to effectuate the transfer of the Property in accordance with the terms of the PSA. Section 6. Non-Substantive Changes. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. Section 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. G.7.h Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 C - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.h Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 C - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 ATTACHMENT A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS G.7.h Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 C - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 4 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22747 BARTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (APN 0276-202-54) WHEREAS, the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (“Successor Agency”) currently owns real property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) (“Property”) as legally described in Exhibit “A” of the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement (“PSA”); and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has declared the Property as exempt surplus property under the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D)); and WHEREAS, under the PSA, the City of Grand Terrace intends to purchase the Property for $144,000 which is the appraised fair market value of the Property; and WHEREAS, upon adoption of this Resolution, the parties will open escrow which shall be subject to certain conditions including the approval of the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) as may be applicable under the law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. CEQA. Based upon the forgoing and written and oral presentations made by City staff and members of the public, the City Council hereby finds that the purchase and sale of the Property from the Successor Agency to the City as contemplated by this Resolution is not subject to environmental review pursuant to CEQA Regulations Section 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 (b) (5) - Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Further, even if it is a project, this action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (when it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that an action will have a significant effect on the environment, that activity is not subject to CEQA). The purchase and sale of the Property will not have any effect on the environment. Ownership will change; however, no physical changes are proposed or authorized with the purchase and sale. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility of significant environmental effects and the purchase and sale is not subject to CEQA. Any use (such as any potential use G.7.i Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 D - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 as library or community center) as determined by the City Council would be subject to a separate discretionary action and CEQA compliance review at that time. The full extent of the future use, design, and operations of the Property are speculative at this point and are therefore not yet ripe for evaluation. Potential environmental impacts will be evaluated at the time the City Council considers establishing the specific use for the Property. Section 3. Approval. The Successor Agency hereby approves the Purchase and Sale Agreement for Real Property and Joint Escrow Instructions in substantially the form attached hereto as Attachment “A” of this Resolution (“PSA”) to purchase the Property. The Mayor is authorized to execute the PSA, subject to the City Attorney’s approval as to form. Section 4. Authorized Actions. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the City, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the purposes of this Resolution, which includes, but is not limited to, authorization to the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to effectuate the transfer of the Property in accordance with the terms of the PSA. Section 5. Non-Substantive Changes. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. This includes, but is not limited, any amendments to this Resolution and its attachments in order to conform with any requirements of the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board, California Department of Finance, and any other applicable agency. Section 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City Council declares that the City Council would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ G.7.i Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 D - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra City Attorney G.7.i Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 D - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 ATTACHMENT A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS G.7.i Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 D - C C R e s o l u t i o n f o r A p p r o v i n g P S A v 3 [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 1 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (“Agreement”), is made as of May ___, 2021 (“Agreement Date”) is by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity (“Seller”), and CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation (“Buyer”). RECITALS A. Seller owns that certain real property located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (“City”), County of San Bernardino, State of California as legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (APN #0276-202-54-0000) (“Property”). B. Seller has declared the Property as Surplus Exempt Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54222.3. C. Seller desires to sell, and Buyer desires to purchase, the Property (as defined below), all in accordance with the terms set forth below. TERMS & CONDITIONS NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE AND SALE OF PROPERTY. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement (including the Recitals which are incorporated herein), Buyer hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, and Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, the Property. 2. OPENING OF ESCROW. The parties shall open escrow (“Escrow”) with Fidelity National Title Insurance Company with escrow officer Mary Lou Adame at 3237 East Guasti Road Suite 105 Ontario, CA 91761 (“Escrow Holder”) by causing a copy of the executed Agreement to be delivered to Escrow Holder together with the Deposit (defined below). Upon receipt, Escrow Holder shall execute the Escrow Acceptance & Agreement on the signature page below after inserting the date Escrow is opened (“Opening of Escrow”) and return a copy of the fully executed and completed Agreement to Buyer and Seller, respectively. 3. PURCHASE PRICE. 3.1 Purchase Price. The Purchase Price is One Hundred Forty Four Thousand Dollars ($144,000). 3.2 Payment of Purchase Price. The Purchase Price shall be paid as follows: a. Deposit. Buyer has deposited with Escrow the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) (“Deposit”). b. Balance of Purchase Price. Buyer shall deposit the balance of the Purchase Price with Escrow Holder in Good Funds (as defined below) at least one (1) G.7.j Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 2 business day prior to the Closing Date. 3.3 Good Funds. All funds deposited in Escrow shall be in “Good Funds” which means a wire transfer of funds, cashier's or certified check drawn on or issued by the offices of a financial institution located in the State of California. 4. CLOSING DATE; TIME IS OF ESSENCE. 4.1 Closing Date. Escrow shall close as soon as practicable (but in no event later than November 30, 2021) after the last of the Redevelopment Approvals (defined in Section 8.1(ii)), the SLA Approvals (defined in Section 8.2(iii)) and the Dissolution Approvals (defined in Section 8.2(v)) have been issued (“Closing Date”). The terms “Close of Escrow” and/or “Closing” are used herein to mean the time the Grant Deed is filed for recording by the Escrow Holder in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. Both parties shall cooperate to close Escrow promptly. 4.2 Time is of Essence. Buyer and Seller specifically agree that time is of the essence under this Agreement. 4.3 Executive Director Authority. Seller by its execution of this Agreement agrees that the Executive Director or his designee (who has been designated by Executive Director’s written notice delivered to Buyer and Escrow Holder) shall have the authority to execute any and all documents on behalf of Seller including, but not limited to, issuing approvals, disapprovals and extensions. Any such approval, disapproval or extension executed by the Executive Director or his designee shall be binding on Seller. 4.4 City Manager Authority. Buyer by its execution of this Agreement agrees that the City Manager or his designee (who has been designated by City Manager’s written notice delivered to Buyer and Escrow Holder) shall have the authority to execute any and all documents on behalf of Buyer including, but not limited to, issuing approvals, disapprovals and extensions. Any such approval, disapproval or extension executed by the City Manager or his designee shall be binding on Buyer. 5. DOCUMENTS TO BE DELIVERED. 5.1 Seller’s Deliveries. Seller covenants and agrees to deliver or cause to be delivered to Escrow Holder within one (1) business day prior to the Closing Date the following instruments, documents and funds, the delivery of each of which shall be a condition precedent to the Closing for the benefit of Buyer. a. Grant Deed. A Grant Deed executed and acknowledged by Seller in a form mutually acceptable to both parties (“Grant Deed”). b. Non-Foreign Certification. A Transferor’s Certification of Non-Foreign Status (“FIRPTA Certificate”), duly executed by Seller under penalty of perjury upon the terms set forth therein, setting forth Seller’s address and federal tax identification number and certifying that Seller is a “United States Person” and that Seller is not a “foreign person” in accordance with and/or for the purpose of the provisions of Sections 7701 and 1445 (as may be amended) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any regulations promulgated thereunder. G.7.j Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 3 c. Closing Documents. Any additional tax forms, recordation forms, 1099s or other documents as may be reasonably required by the Escrow Holder or the Title Company to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 5.2 Buyer’s Deliveries. Buyer hereby covenants and agrees to deliver or cause to be delivered to Escrow Holder within one (1) business day prior to the Closing Date the following instruments and documents, the delivery of each of which shall be a condition precedent to the Closing for the benefit of Seller: a. Purchase Price. The balance of the Purchase Price and any additional required funds all in Good Funds. b. Preliminary Change of Ownership Statement. A Preliminary Change of Ownership Statement completed in the manner required in San Bernardino County. c. Closing Documents. Any additional tax forms, recordation forms, or other documents as may be reasonably required by the Escrow Holder or the Title Company to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 6. TITLE. 6.1 Title Approval. Within three (3) days of the Opening of Escrow, Seller shall deliver to Buyer and Escrow, at Seller’s own cost and expense, a preliminary title report for an ALTA non-extended owner’s policy of title insurance with standard exceptions (“PTR”) issued by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Title Company”) including hyperlinks to or copies of all documents shown in the commitment as affecting title (“Title Documents”) and a plotting of any easements on the Property. If Buyer requires any endorsements to the Title Policy, or if Buyer requires an extended coverage ALTA owner's policy of title insurance ("Extended ALTA Policy") or a binder in lieu of a policy of title insurance, then Buyer shall make such election in a timely manner so as to not delay the Closing and pay the additional cost of obtaining any endorsements or such Extended ALTA Policy, including, without limitation, timely obtaining a survey at its sole cost and expense. Seller shall execute and deliver to the Title Company an Owner's Affidavit and such other documentation as may be reasonably required by the Title Company to issue the Title Policy as defined in Section 6.2. Buyer shall have three (3) days from receipt of the PTR and Title Documents to inspect the state of the title and matters affecting title, and to object to the matters shown thereby (“Title Objection Notice”). Failure to provide the Title Objection Notice in writing within the above period shall constitute Buyer’s objection to all exceptions to title shown on the PTR. If Buyer objects to any matter disclosed by the PTR or Title Documents, then Seller shall have three (3) business days from the date it is notified in writing of the particular defects claimed, to elect, in its reasonable discretion, either: (1) to remedy the title defect that is the subject of Buyer’s objection by removal or endorsement, or (2) not remedy the title defect that is the subject of Buyer’s objection, at Seller’s option (“Seller’s Election Notice”). Seller’s Election Notice shall be communicated in writing to Buyer. If Seller elects not to remedy such title defect (or fails to timely notify Buyer of its election with regard to same), then Buyer shall have two (2) days following (i) receipt of Seller’s Election Notice under the preceding sentence, or (ii) Seller’s failure to timely provide Buyer with such written notification, to elect to either (a) waive its title objection and accept title subject to the alleged title defect, or (b) terminate this Agreement and receive a refund of the Deposit. G.7.j Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 4 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Closing, any updates to the PTR are received by Buyer, Buyer shall have three (3) business days (regardless of the date) following Buyer's receipt of such update and legible copies of all underlying documents referenced therein (that were not referenced in the Title Documents previously provided to Buyer) to notify Seller of objections to items on any such updates (“Title Updates”), and in the event Seller does not agree to remedy such objections, Buyer may terminate this Agreement or waive such objections and proceed to Closing. 6.2 Title Policy. At Closing, the Title Company will commit to issue an ALTA non-extended (or extended if Buyer complies with the requirements above) owner’s title policy showing the (i) any possessory interest real estate taxes as applicable; (ii) Permitted Exceptions (as defined below); and (iv) any exceptions created by Buyer (“Title Policy”). “Permitted Exceptions” means those items disclosed by the PTR that Buyer does not object to, or that Buyer waives objection to, or agrees to take title subject to, or that Buyer agrees to accept affirmative title insurance coverage over, and all zoning ordinances and regulations. 7. POSSESSION. At Closing, Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to Buyer free and clear of any occupants or claims of possession. 8. CONDITIONS TO CLOSING. 8.1 Closing Conditions for Benefit of Buyer. Buyer’s obligation to purchase the Property are subject to and expressly conditioned upon satisfaction (or written waiver) by Buyer of the following conditions precedent to the Closing: i. As of the Closing Date, the Title Company will issue the Title Policy in accordance with Section 6.2. ii. If applicable, the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board and the California Department of Finance have approved this transaction (“Redevelopment Approvals”). iii. Seller is not in material breach of its obligations in this Agreement. 8.2 Closing Conditions for Benefit of Seller. Seller’s obligation to sell the Property are subject to and expressly conditioned upon satisfaction (or written waiver) by Seller of the following conditions precedent to the Closing: i. As of the Closing Date, the Title Company will issue the Title Policy in accordance with Section 6.2. ii. The California Department of Housing and Community Development does not object to the Exempt Surplus Property resolution (“SLA Approvals”). iii. The Redevelopment Approvals have been issued. iv. The California Department of Finance has approved all applications submitted by Seller related to the dissolution of Seller as successor agency except for applications made under Health & Safety Code Section 34187 (“Dissolution Approvals”). G.7.j Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 5 v. Escrow holds the balance of the Purchase Price and will deliver same to Seller. vi. Buyer is not in material breach of its obligations under this Agreement. 9. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. Buyer agrees to acquire the Property in its “AS IS” condition and shall be responsible for any and all defects in the Property, whether patent or latent, including, without limitation, the physical, environmental, and geotechnical condition of the Property, and the existence of any contamination, hazardous materials, vaults, debris, pipelines, wells, or other structures located on, under or about the Property. Seller makes no representation or warranty concerning the physical, environmental, geotechnical or other condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges that Seller has no liability for the environmental condition and Buyer agrees to indemnify Seller against any claim or liability relating to the environmental condition of the Property. Seller grants Buyer a license to enter the Property to conduct due diligence to the extent Buyer deems necessary. 10. PRORATIONS AND ALLOCATION OF COSTS; LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. 10.1 Taxes. As both parties are public entities and exempt from property taxes, Escrow Holder is not to be concerned with proration of taxes. 10.2 Costs. Seller shall pay (i) the documentary transfer taxes; (ii) premium for an ALTA non-extended owner’s title policy; and (iii) fifty percent (50%) of Escrow fees. Buyer shall pay (a) any additional premium for an extended coverage ALTA owner’s policy (if required by Buyer); and (b) fifty percent (50%) of Escrow fees Any other charges shall be paid in accordance to custom in southern California area. NOTE: Recording fees are not applicable pursuant to Govt Code Section 6103. Documentary taxes are not applicable pursuant to Rev & Tax Code Section 11922. 10.3 BUYER’S DEFAULT. IF BUYER FAILS TO COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY AS PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT BY REASON OF ANY DEFAULT OF BUYER, SELLER SHALL BE RELEASED FROM ITS OBLIGATION TO SELL THE PROPERTY TO BUYER. BUYER AND SELLER ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE IMPRACTICAL AND/OR EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO FIX OR ESTABLISH THE ACTUAL DAMAGE SUSTAINED BY SELLER AS A RESULT OF SUCH DEFAULT BY BUYER AND AGREE THAT THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS IS A REASONABLE APPROXIMATION THEREOF. ACCORDINGLY, IN THE EVENT THAT BUYER BREACHES THIS AGREEMENT BY DEFAULTING IN THE COMPLETION OF THE PURCHASE, SAID AMOUNT SHALL CONSTITUTE AND BE DEEMED TO BE THE AGREED AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES OF SELLER, AND SHALL BE PAID BY BUYER TO SELLER AS SELLER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. EXCEPT FOR ATTORNEYS’ AND OTHER FEES RECOVERABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 19 BELOW AND ITS RIGHTS TO BE INDEMNIFIED AS PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, SELLER AGREES TO AND DOES HEREBY WAIVE ALL OTHER REMEDIES AGAINST BUYER WHICH SELLER MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE AT LAW OR IN EQUITY BY REASON OF SUCH DEFAULT BY BUYER. THE PAYMENT OF SPECIFIED AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY BUT IS INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES TO SELLER PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1671, 1676 AND 1677. G.7.j Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 6 SELLER’S INITIALS: __________ BUYER’S INITIALS: __________ 11. BINDING EFFECT. The covenants herein shall bind and inure to the benefit of the executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties. Buyer may not assign its rights under this Agreement to any person or entity without the prior written consent of Seller, which shall be provided or withheld in Seller’s sole discretion. In the event of an assignment of Buyer’s interests under this Agreement with Seller’s consent, the assignee shall agree to assume and be bound by the terms and provisions hereof and Buyer shall not be released of its obligations hereunder. 12. BROKER. Seller and Buyer acknowledge that no other broker or finder was involved in this transaction and each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any claim that a commission or fee is due to any other broker or finder who dealt with the party from whom indemnification is sought. 13. INTEGRATION; MERGER; SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS. Seller and Buyer have not made any covenants, warranties or representations not set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties. All representations, warranties and covenants set forth in this Agreement shall survive closing. 14. AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION. This Agreement may only be modified or amended by a written agreement executed by both parties. 15. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16. NOTICES. All notices shall be in writing and delivered personally, by overnight air courier service, by facsimile transmission, electronic mail, or by U.S. certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the parties at their respective addresses set forth below, and the same shall be effective upon receipt if delivered personally, one (1) business day after depositing with an overnight air courier, two (2) business days after depositing in the mail, or upon transmission (as confirmed by electronic confirmation of transmission generated by the sender’s machine) for any notice given by facsimile or electronic mail: To Seller: Grand Terrace Successor Agency 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Attn: Executive Director With a copy to: Aleshire & Wynder, LLP 18881 Von Karman Ave Suite 1700 Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: Adrian Guerra, Agency Counsel To Buyer: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Attn: City Manager With a copy to: Aleshire & Wynder, LLP G.7.j Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 7 18881 Von Karman Ave Suite 1700 Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: Adrian Guerra, City Attorney To Escrow Holder: Fidelity Title National Title Company 3237 East Guasti Road Suite 105 Ontario, CA 91761 Attn Mary Lou Adame 17. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. 18. ATTORNEY’S FEES. In the event any action or suit is brought by a party hereto against another party hereunder by reason of any breach of any of the covenants, agreements or provisions on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, then in that event the prevailing party shall be entitled to have and recover from the other party all costs and expenses of the action or suit, including actual attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and accounting fees, and any other professional fees resulting therefrom. 19. SEVERABILITY. If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then this Agreement, including all of the remaining terms, will remain in full force and effect as if such invalid or unenforceable term had never been included. 20. CONSTRUCTION. In determining the meaning of, or resolving any ambiguity with respect to, any word, phrase or provision of this Agreement, no uncertainty or ambiguity shall be construed or resolved against a party under any rule of construction, including the party primarily responsible for the drafting and preparation of this Agreement. Headings used in this Agreement are provided for convenience only and shall not be used to construe meaning or intent. As used in this Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others wherever and whenever the context so dictates 21. QUALIFICATION; AUTHORITY. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of Buyer represents, warrants and covenants to Seller that (a) such person is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of Buyer in accordance with authority granted under its organizational documents of such entity, and (b) Buyer is bound under the terms of this Agreement. 22. NO WAIVER. The failure of either party to enforce any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement on the date it is to be performed shall not be construed as a waiver of that party's right to enforce this, or any other, term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement at any later date or as a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement. 23. EXHIBITS. Exhibit A is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.7.j Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. BUYER: SELLER: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation By: __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor _________________, 2021 ATTEST: ____________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aleshire & Wynder, LLP By: _____________________ Adrian Guerra, City Attorney CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity By: __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair _________________, 2021 ATTEST: ____________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aleshire & Wynder, LLP By: _____________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel ESCROW ACCEPTANCE & AGREEMENT Fidelity Title Company as Escrow Holder under this Agreement hereby certifies that the Opening of Escrow occurred on _______________, 2021, and Escrow Holder agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. Escrow Holder has assigned Escrow No. _______________ to the Escrow. ESCROW HOLDER: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: Mary Lou Adame, Escrow Officer G.7.j Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 1 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That certain real property located in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: G.7.j Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 3 E - A t t a c h m e n t A - P S A v 3 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LAST AND FINAL RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (“Successor Agency”) to the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (“RDA”) borrowed $448,636 from its Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to pay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (“SERAF”) pursuant to the Health & Safety Code (“SERAF Loan”); and WHEREAS, HSC 34171(d)(1)(G) and 34176(e) requires repayment of the SERAF Loan provided that the Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion and provided that a repayment schedule is approved by the Oversight Board; and WHEREAS, the SERAF Loan repayment schedule was approved by the Successor Agency’s original oversight board on January 18, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency approved Resolution No. _____, which amended the SERAF Loan repayment schedule on May 11, 2021, in order to allow an option for immediate repayment thereof, which approval will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“SERAF Loan Amendment”); and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace (“City”) currently owes approximately $885,797 to the Successor Agency pursuant to a Loan Agreement, which memorializes prior loans made by the former Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency to the City, dated April 12, 2021 (“City Loan Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City and Successor Agency approved an amendment to the City Loan Agreement on May 11, 2021, pursuant to its Resolution No. _____ in order to allow for an accelerated repayment, which will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board for its approval (“City Loan Amendment”) WHEREAS, the City and Successor Agency approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement on May 11, 2021, to sell the property held by the Successor Agency and located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) to the City for the amount of $144,000, and such approval will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“PSA”); and G.7.k Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) approved the Successor Agency’s Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPS”) and, pursuant to HSC 34191.6, the Last & Final ROPS that was approved by California Department of Finance (“DOF” by letter dated August 6, 2018; and WHEREAS, the CWOB approved a first amendment to the Last & Final ROPS, which was approved by the DOF by letter dated October 3, 2019 (revised); and WHEREAS, upon the CWOB approval and DOF approval of the SERAF Loan Amendment, the City Loan Amendment, and the PSA, the Successor Agency desires to utilize the funds that would be received from the City’s repayment of the City Loan Agreement and the sale of the property to the City pursuant to the PSA, and any Successor Agency-held funds to repay the SERAF Loan in full with any remaining funds being distributed to the affected taxing entities; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize the above-mentioned payments and transactions, the Successor Agency’s Last & Final ROPS must be amended a second time; and WHEREAS, HSC 34191.6(c)(2)(A) allows successor agencies to submit two (2) amendment requests of the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPs”) to DOF, after such request is reviewed and approved by the CWOB; and WHEREAS, HSC 34177 requires the CWOB to approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) and administrative budget; and WHEREAS, in order to evaluate the most efficient, practical and financially responsible expenditure of the moneys held by the Successor Agency, the Successor Agency has retained certain legal and financial advisors to evaluate the potential dissolution of the Successor Agency by the sale of the Property to the City and repayment of the City Loan by the City and, further, to use such funds generated by such loan repayment and such property sale and other Successor Agency-held funds to repay the entirety of the SERAF Loan for the ultimate goal of dissolving the Successor Agency pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, based on such evaluation and the advice of such legal and financial advisors, the Successor Agency has determined that it is to the benefit of the relevant affected taxing entities to (i) Approve the SERAF Loan Amendment; (ii) Approve the City Loan Amendment; (iii) Approve the PSA and sale of the Property to the City; (iv) Amend the Last & Final ROPs to allow the use of the funds generated from the repayment of the City Loan, the PSA, and any other Successor Agency-held funds to make full payment upon the SERAF Loan so that the Successor Agency may dissolve pursuant to HSC 34187; and G.7.k Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 WHEREAS, the approval of the Last & Final ROPS and the subsequent carrying out of the payments and transactions will allow the Successor Agency to be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, the DOF has approved the above-mentioned process as provided in their email attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has prepared an analysis (“Report”), which demonstrates that affected taxing entities will generally receive increased distributions of money if the Successor Agency is allowed to dissolve pursuant to HSC 34187, and therefore it is in the best interests of all taxing entities that the Successor Agency dissolve; and WHEREAS, the second amendment to the Last & Final ROPS may be adjusted post-approval to account for an alternative approval by the CWOB or DOF (“Changes”); and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has reviewed the second amendment to the Last & Final ROPS and other documents and reports submitted herewith and is fully briefed on the issues. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. Approval. The second amendment to the Last & Final ROPS and administrative budget in the form presented (and as may be adjusted to take into account the Changes from the CWOB) are hereby approved in substantially the form as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference in Exhibit “A”. Section 3. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the CWOB, San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, the California Department of Finance, and any other agency as may be required. The Executive Director is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution and its exhibits to comply with the requirements set forth by the CWOB, California Department of Finance, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency. Section 4. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to G.7.k Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate this Resolution. Section 5. Non-Substantive Changes. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. Section 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.k Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Exhibit A 2nd Amendment to the Last and Final ROPS and Administrative Budget G.7.k Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Exhibit B California Department of Finance Email regarding Procedure to Dissolve Successor Agency G.7.k Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 4 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 t o t h e L a s t & F i n a l R O P S v 2 [ R e v i s i o n 3 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.l Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : L a s t & F i n a l R O P S A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.l Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : L a s t & F i n a l R O P S A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) AB C D E F G H IJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF 498,636$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 - - - 2 - - - - - 3 - - 5 - - 9 - - 10 - - 38 - - 41 - - - 51 SERAF Loan LMIHF - Reserve SERAF/ERAF 4/26/2011 4/26/2016 LMIHF Repayment of loan for SERAF- Reserve 248,636 - 53 Administrative Expenses Admin Costs 7/1/2017 6/30/2021 Various Employee costs, administrative supplies and cost, legal services 250,000 - - - Grand Terrace Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) - ROPS Detail Item #Payee Description/Project Scope Project Area Total Outstanding Obligation Project Name/Debt Obligation Obligation Type Contract/Agreement Execution Date Contract/Agreement Termination Date July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2046 (Report Amounts in Whole Dollars) 18-19A (July - December) Fund Sources Fund Sources Fund Sources 19-20B (January - June) 18-19B (January - June) 19-20A (July - December) Fund Sources G.7.l Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : L a s t & F i n a l R O P S A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) AB C D E F G H 1 2 3 5 9 10 38 41 51 SERAF Loan LMIHF - Reserve SERAF/ERAF 4/26/2011 4/26/2016 LMIHF Repayment of loan for SERAF- Reserve 53 Administrative Expenses Admin Costs 7/1/2017 6/30/2021 Various Employee costs, administrative supplies and cost, legal services Grand Terrace Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) - ROPS Detail Item #Payee Description/Project Scope Project AreaProject Name/Debt Obligation Obligation Type Contract/Agreement Execution Date Contract/Agreement Termination Date July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2046 (Report Amounts in Whole Dollars) ZAAABACADAEAFAGAH AI AJAKAL AM ANAO Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 498,636$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 248,636 250,000 Fund Sources Fund Sources 21-22A (July - December) 20-21A (July - December) 20-21B (January - June) Fund Sources Fund Sources 21-22B (January - June) G.7.l Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : L a s t & F i n a l R O P S A m e n d m e n t N o . 2 ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.m Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : D O F E m a i l R e g a r d i n g S A D i s s o l u t i o n ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.m Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : D O F E m a i l R e g a r d i n g S A D i s s o l u t i o n ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REQUESTING THE OVERSIGHT BOARD TO APPROVE THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S REQUEST FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NOTICE TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE OVERSIGHT BOARD PURSUANT TO HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 34187(E)(2), AND MAKING RELATED FINDINGS WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section (“HSC”) 34173(d), the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is the successor agency (the “Successor Agency”) to the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace; and WHEREAS, the former Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace (“RDA”) borrowed $448,636 from its Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to pay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (“SERAF”) pursuant to the Health & Safety Code (“SERAF Loan”). Further, HSC 34171(d)(1)(G) and 34176(e) requires repayment of the SERAF Loan provided that a repayment schedule is approved by the Oversight Board; and WHEREAS, the SERAF Loan repayment schedule was approved by the Successor Agency’s original oversight board on January 18, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency approved Resolution No. _____, which amended the SERAF Loan repayment schedule on May 11, 2021, in order to allow an option for an accelerated repayment in order to assist the Successor Agency in its dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187, which approval will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“SERAF Loan Amendment”); and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace (“City”) currently owes $885,797 to the Successor Agency pursuant to a Loan Agreement, which memorializes prior loans made by the former Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency to the City, dated April 12, 2021 (“City Loan Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City and Successor Agency approved an amendment to the City Loan Agreement on May 11, 2021, pursuant to its Resolution No. _____ in order to allow for an accelerated repayment in order to assist the Successor Agency in its dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187, which will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board for its approval (“City Loan Amendment”) G.7.n Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 5 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r R e q u e s t t o O B f o r D i s s o l u t i o n [ R e v i s i o n 5 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 WHEREAS, the City and Successor Agency approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement on May 11, 2021, to transfer the property held by the Successor Agency and located at 22747 Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace (APN 0276-202-54) (“Property”) to the City for its estimated value in the amount of $144,000, and such approval will be concurrently submitted to the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“PSA”); and WHEREAS, the transfer of the Property to the City will assist the Successor Agency in seeking dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board (“CWOB”) approved the Successor Agency’s Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPS”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 34191.6, the Last & Final ROPS that was approved by California Department of Finance (“DOF”) by letter dated August 6, 2018; and WHEREAS, the CWOB approved a first amendment to the Last & Final ROPS, which was approved by the DOF by letter dated October 3, 2019 (revised); and WHEREAS, upon the CWOB’s approval and DOF’s approval of the SERAF Loan Amendment, the City Loan Amendment, and the PSA, the Successor Agency desires to utilize the funds that would be received from the City’s repayment of the City Loan Agreement and the sale of the property to the City pursuant to the PSA, and any Successor Agency-held funds to repay the SERAF Loan with any remaining funds being transferred to the affected taxing entities; and WHEREAS, HSC 34191.6(c)(2)(A) allows successor agencies to submit two (2) amendment requests of the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“Last & Final ROPs”) to the DOF, after such request is reviewed and approved by the CWOB; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize the above-mentioned payments and transactions, the Successor Agency amended its Last & Final ROPS, which will be concurrently submitted to the CWOB; and WHEREAS, upon the approval of the Last & Final ROPS and the carrying out of the payments and transactions, the Successor Agency will carry out the contemplated actions and be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187 as follows: A. All enforceable obligations have been retired or paid off, as applicable. Upon approval of both the City Loan Amendment, the PSA, SERAF Loan Amendment, Last & Final ROPS, it is anticipated that the City will immediately repay the balance of the City Loan and the Successor Agency will immediately transfer the Property to the City pursuant to the PSA. Revenue generated and any Successor Agency-held funds would G.7.n Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 5 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r R e q u e s t t o O B f o r D i s s o l u t i o n [ R e v i s i o n 5 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 then be used to repay the SERAF Loan, which is the Successor Agency’s remaining enforceable obligation. Any remaining funds would then be transferred to the affected taxing entities pursuant to law; and B. All real property has been disposed of pursuant to Section 34181 or 34191.4. Upon approval of the PSA, the final Successor Agency property will be transferred to the City pursuant to the PSA; and C. All outstanding litigation has been resolved. There is no outstanding litigation for the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency now desires to contingently request, as provided in this Resolution and as required by HSC 34187, that the CWOB authorize that it carry out all acts necessary to dissolve the Successor Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. Dissolution Eligibility. Upon the approval of the Last & Final ROPS and the carrying out of the payments and transactions, the Successor Agency will complete all required actions and be eligible for dissolution pursuant to HSC 34187(b) as follows: A. All enforceable obligations have been retired or paid off, as applicable. Upon approval of both the City Loan Amendment, the PSA, SERAF Loan Amendment, Last & Final ROPS, it is anticipated that the City will immediately repay the balance of the City Loan and the Successor Agency will immediately transfer the Property to the City pursuant to the PSA. Revenue generated and any Successor Agency-held funds would then be used to repay the SERAF Loan, which is the Successor Agency’s remaining enforceable obligation. Any remaining funds would then be transferred to the affected taxing entities pursuant to law; and B. All real property has been disposed of pursuant to HSC 34181 or 34191.4. Upon approval of the PSA, the final Successor Agency property will be transferred to the City pursuant to the PSA; and C. All outstanding litigation has been resolved. There is no outstanding litigation for the Successor Agency; and Section 3. Request for Dissolution. Based upon the forgoing, the Successor Agency hereby requests that the CWOB approve the Successor Agency’s request for dissolution contingent upon the following: G.7.n Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 5 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r R e q u e s t t o O B f o r D i s s o l u t i o n [ R e v i s i o n 5 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 A. The CWOB and the DOF have approved the City Loan Amendment. B. The CWOB and DOF have approved the change in the property disposition designation for the Property from “future development” to “government use” and have approved the PSA. C. The Property is transferred to the City from the Successor Agency pursuant to the terms of the PSA. D. The CWOB and the DOF have approved the SERAF Loan Amendment. E. The CWOB and DOF have approved the second amendment to the Last & Final ROPS such that the Successor Agency is able to utilize the funds realized from the City Loan and PSA, and any remaining Successor Agency-held funds to fully repay the SERAF Loan. F. The City Loan and SERAF Loan has been fully repaid. Section 4. Notification to CWOB regarding Completion of Acts. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to provide the notice to the CWOB pursuant to HSC 34187(e)(2). Further, this Resolution shall also serve as notice to the CWOB pursuant to HSC 34187(e)(2). Section 5. Submittal; Other Actions. The Executive Director is hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit this Resolution to the CWOB, San Bernardino County Administrative Officer, the San Bernardino County Auditor- Controller, the California Department of Finance, and any other agency as may be required. The Executive Director is further authorized to perform all acts necessary and appropriate which may be required by the Health & Safety Code. This includes, but is not limited to, amendments to this Resolution to comply with the requirements set forth by the CWOB, California Department of Finance, the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency. Seciton 6. Official Action. The officers of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate this Resolution. Section 7. Non-Substantive Changes. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to make such non-substantive changes and adjustments to this Resolution which may be necessary, appropriate, or required by law. This includes, but is not limited, any amendments to this Resolution in order to conform with any requirements of the San Bernardino Countywide Oversight Board, California Department of Finance, and any other applicable agency. G.7.n Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 5 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r R e q u e s t t o O B f o r D i s s o l u t i o n [ R e v i s i o n 5 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) 01247.0029/554030.2 Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution. Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this [____] day of [________], 2021. _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Debra Thomas, Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Adrian Guerra, Successor Agency Counsel G.7.n Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : 0 0 0 5 - S A R e s o l u t i o n f o r R e q u e s t t o O B f o r D i s s o l u t i o n [ R e v i s i o n 5 ] ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.o Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : C i t y _ C R A - L o a n A g r e e m e n t ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.o Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : C i t y _ C R A - L o a n A g r e e m e n t ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Integra Realty Resources Orange County Appraisal of Real Property 22747 Barton Road Vacant Land 22747 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, California 92313 Prepared For: City of Grand Terrace Date of the Report: April 29, 2021 Report Format: Appraisal Report IRR - Orange County File Number: 212-2021-0062 G.7.p Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Subject Photographs 22747 Barton Road 22747 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, California G.7.p Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Aerial Photograph G.7.p Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Integra Realty Resources 2151 Michelson Drive T 949.591-8150 Orange County Suite 205 www.irr.com/orangecounty Irvine, CA 92612 April 29, 2021 Harold Duffy City Manager City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 SUBJECT: Market Value Appraisal 22747 Barton Road 22747 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, California 92313 IRR - Orange County File No. 212-2021-0062 Dear Mr. Duffy: Integra Realty Resources – Orange County is pleased to submit the accompanying appraisal of the referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to develop an opinion of the market value, pertaining to the fee simple interest in the property. The client for the assignment is theCity of Grand Terrace. The intended use of the report is for property disposition purposes. No other party or parties may use or rely on the information, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report. The subject is a parcel of vacant land containing an area of 0.33 acres or 14,375 square feet. The property is zoned BRSP, Barton Road Specific Plan, which permits professional and administrative office uses. The appraisal conforms to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute, and applicable state appraisal regulations. Standards Rule 2-2 (Content of a Real Property Appraisal Report) contained in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) requires each written real property appraisal report to be prepared as either an Appraisal Report or a Restricted Appraisal Report. This report is prepared as an Appraisal Report as defined by USPAP under Standards G.7.p Packet Pg. 112 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Harold Duffy City of Grand Terrace April 29, 2021 Page 2 Rule 2-2(a), and incorporates a practical explanation of the data, reasoning, and analysis that were used to develop the opinion of value. Based on the valuation analysis in the accompanying report, and subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions expressed in the report, the concluded opinions of value are as follows: Value Conclusion Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value Conclusion Market Value Fee Simple April 1, 2021 $144,000 Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 1. None 1. None The use of any extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition may have affected the assignment results. The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions. A hypothetical condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions. An extraordinary assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. The value conclusion(s) in this report consider the impact of COVID-19 on the subject property. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. G.7.p Packet Pg. 113 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Harold Duffy City of Grand Terrace April 29, 2021 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, Integra Realty Resources - Orange County Stephanie Kavanaugh California Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #AG030565 Telephone: 949-591-8149 Email: skavanaugh@irr.com J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS California Certified Real Estate Appraiser #AG008427 Telephone: 949-591-8147 Email: rick.donahue@irr.com G.7.p Packet Pg. 114 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Table of Contents 22747 Barton Road Quality Assurance 1 Executive Summary 2 Identification of the Appraisal Problem 4 Subject Description 4 Sale History 4 Appraisal Purpose 4 Value Type Definitions 4 Appraisal Premise Definitions 5 Property Rights Definitions 5 Client and Intended User(s) 5 Intended Use 5 Applicable Requirements 5 Report Format 6 Prior Services 6 Appraiser Competency 6 Scope of Work 7 Economic Analysis 9 San Bernardino County Area Analysis 9 Surrounding Area 14 Office Market Analysis 17 Class B/C Office Overview 18 COVID-19 Impact on Current Valuations 27 Property Analysis 29 Land Description and Analysis 29 Real Estate Taxes 36 Highest and Best Use 37 Valuation 39 Valuation Methodology 39 Sales Comparison Approach 40 Analysis and Adjustment of Sales 43 Land Value Conclusion 47 Reconciliation and Conclusion of Value 48 Exposure Time 48 Marketing Time 48 Addenda A. Appraiser Qualifications B. IRR Quality Assurance Survey C. Definitions D. Property Information E. Comparable Data G.7.p Packet Pg. 115 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Quality Assurance 1 22747 Barton Road Quality Assurance IRR Quality Assurance Program At IRR, delivering a quality report is a top priority. Integra has an internal Quality Assurance Program in which managers review material and pass an exam to attain IRR Certified Reviewer status. By policy, every Integra valuation assignment is assessed by an IRR Certified Reviewer who holds the MAI designation, or is, at a minimum, a named Director with at least ten years of valuation experience. This quality assurance assessment consists of reading the report and providing feedback on its quality and consistency. All feedback from the IRR Certified Reviewer is then addressed internally before delivery. This internal assessment process intends to maintain report quality. Designated IRR Certified Reviewer An internal quality assurance assessment was conducted by an IRR Certified Reviewer before the delivery of this appraisal report. This assessment should not be construed as an appraisal review as defined by USPAP. G.7.p Packet Pg. 116 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Executive Summary 2 22747 Barton Road Executive Summary Property Name Address Property Type Owner of Record Tax ID Land Area 0.33 acres; 14,375 SF Zoning Designation Highest and Best Use Exposure Time; Marketing Period 12 months; 12 months Effective Date of the Appraisal April 1, 2021 Date of the Report April 20, 2021 Property Interest Appraised Sales Comparison Approach Number of Sales 5 Range of Sale Dates Mar 19 to Sep 20 Range of Prices per SF (Unadjusted)$6.67 - $11.61 Market Value Conclusion $144,000 ($10.02/SF) The values reported above are subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions set forth in the accompanying report of which this summary is a part. No party other than City of Grand Terrace may use or rely on the information, opinions, and conclusions contained in the report. It is assumed that the users of the report have read the entire report, including all of the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions contained therein. BRSP, Barton Road Specific Plan Future office use Fee Simple City of Grand Terrace 0276-202-54 22747 Barton Road 22747 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, California 92313 Land - Office Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 1. None 1. None The use of any extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition may have affected the assignment results. The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions. A hypothetical condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions. An extraordinary assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. G.7.p Packet Pg. 117 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Executive Summary 3 22747 Barton Road Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT Analysis) Strengths  Frontage on Barton Road  Proximity to City Hall Weaknesses  Limited pool of buyers  Limited demand for commercial sites Opportunities  Future office development Threats  N/A G.7.p Packet Pg. 118 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Identification of the Appraisal Problem 4 22747 Barton Road Identification of the Appraisal Problem Subject Description The subject is a parcel of vacant land containing an area of 0.33 acres or 14,375 square feet. The property is zoned BRSP, Barton Road Specific Plan, which permits professional and administrative office uses. A legal description of the property is provided in the addenda. Property Identification Property Name 22747 Barton Road Address 22747 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, California 92313 Tax ID 0276-202-54 Owner of Record City of Grand Terrace Sale History The most recent closed sale of the subject is summarized as follows: Sale Date January 31, 2012 Seller Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency Buyer City of Grand Terrace Sale Price N/A Recording Instrument Number 39506 No known sales or transfers of ownership have taken place within three years before the effective appraisal date. Appraisal Purpose The purpose of the appraisal is to develop the following opinion(s) of value:  The market value of the fee simple interest The date of the report is April 29, 2021. The appraisal is valid only as of the stated effective date or dates. Value Type Definitions The definitions of the value types applicable to this assignment are summarized below. Market Value The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and G.7.p Packet Pg. 119 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Identification of the Appraisal Problem 5 22747 Barton Road assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 1 Appraisal Premise Definitions The definitions of the appraisal premises applicable to this assignment are specified as follows. As-Is Market Value The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal date.2 Property Rights Definitions The property rights appraised which apply to this assignment are defined as follows. Fee Simple Estate Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.3 Client and Intended User The client and intended user is the City of Grand Terrace. No other party or parties may use or rely on the information, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report. Intended Use The intended use of the appraisal is for property disposition purposes. The appraisal is not intended for any other use. Applicable Requirements This appraisal report conforms to the following requirements and regulations:  Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); 1 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 12, Chapter I, Part 34.42[h]; also Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, Federal Register, 75 FR 77449, December 10, 2010, page 77472 2Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) 3 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) G.7.p Packet Pg. 120 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Identification of the Appraisal Problem 6 22747 Barton Road  Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute; and  Applicable state appraisal regulations. Report Format Standards Rule 2-2 (Content of a Real Property Appraisal Report) contained in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) requires each written real property appraisal report to be prepared as either an Appraisal Report or a Restricted Appraisal Report. This report is prepared as an Appraisal Report as defined by USPAP under Standards Rule 2-2(a), and incorporates practical explanation of the data, reasoning, and analysis used to develop the opinion of value. Prior Services USPAP requires appraisers to disclose to the client any other services they have provided in connection with the subject property in the prior three years, including valuation, consulting, property management, brokerage, or any other services. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three years immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. Appraiser Competency No steps were necessary to meet the competency provisions established under USPAP. The assignment participants have appraised several properties similar to the subject in physical, locational, and economic characteristics, and are familiar with market conditions and trends; therefore, appraiser competency provisions are satisfied for this assignment. Appraiser qualifications and state credentials are included in the addenda of this report. G.7.p Packet Pg. 121 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Scope of Work 7 22747 Barton Road Scope of Work Introduction The appraisal development and reporting processes require gathering and analyzing information about the assignment elements necessary to properly identify the appraisal problem. The scope of work decision includes the research and analyses necessary to develop credible assignment results, given the intended use of the appraisal. Sufficient information includes disclosure of research and analyses performed and might also include disclosure of research and analyses not performed. To determine the appropriate scope of work for the assignment, we considered the intended use of the appraisal, the needs of the user, the complexity of the property, and other pertinent factors. Our concluded scope of work is described below. Research and Analysis The type and extent of the research and analysis conducted are detailed in individual sections of the report. The steps taken to verify comparable data are disclosed in the addenda of this report. Although effort has been made to confirm the arms-length nature of each sale with a party to the transaction, it is sometimes necessary to rely on secondary verification from sources deemed reliable. Subject Property Data Sources The legal and physical features of the subject property, including the size of the site, flood plain data, seismic zone designation, property zoning, existing easements and encumbrances, access and exposure, and condition of the improvements (as applicable) were confirmed and analyzed. Inspection Stephanie Kavanaugh inspected the property on April 1, 2021, from the public right-of-way. J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS, did not conduct an inspection. Valuation Methodology Three approaches to value are typically considered when developing a market value opinion for real property. These are the cost approach, the sales comparison approach, and the income capitalization approach. Use of the approaches in this assignment is summarized as follows: Approaches to Value Approach Applicability to Subject Use in Assignment Cost Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized Sales Comparison Approach Applicable Utilized Income Capitalization Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized G.7.p Packet Pg. 122 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Scope of Work 8 22747 Barton Road In developing an opinion of value for the subject, only the sales comparison approach is used. This approach applies to the subject because there is an active market for similar properties, and sufficient sales data is available for analysis. The cost approach is not applicable because there are no improvements that contribute value to the property, and the income approach is not applicable because the subject is not likely to generate rental income in its current state. G.7.p Packet Pg. 123 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) San Bernardino County Area Analysis 9 22747 Barton Road Economic Analysis San Bernardino County Area Analysis San Bernardino County is 20,057 square miles in size and has a population density of 109 persons per square mile. Population San Bernardino County has an estimated 2020 population of 2,192,262, which represents an average annual 0.7% increase over the 2010 census of 2,035,210. San Bernardino County added an average of 15,705 residents per year over the 2010-2020 period, but its annual growth rate lagged the Riverside MSA rate of 1.0%. Looking forward, San Bernardino County's population is projected to increase at a 0.7% annual rate from 2020-2025, equivalent to the addition of an average of 15,547 residents per year. San Bernardino County's growth rate is expected to lag that of the Riverside MSA, which is projected to be 0.8%. Employment Total employment in San Bernardino County was estimated at 749,294 jobs as of September 2020. Between year-end 2010 and 2020, employment rose by 144,513 jobs, equivalent to a 23.9% increase over the entire period. These figures reflect a net gain of 197,705 jobs through 2019, followed by significant losses in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although San Bernardino County's employment rose over the last decade, it underperformed the Riverside MSA, which experienced an increase in employment of 25.4% or 295,274 jobs over this period. A comparison of unemployment rates is another way of gauging an area’s economic health. Over the past decade, the San Bernardino County unemployment rate has been slightly lower than that of the Riverside MSA, with an average unemployment rate of 8.2% in comparison to an 8.4% rate for the Riverside MSA. A lower unemployment rate is a positive indicator. Recent data shows that the San Bernardino County unemployment rate is 8.1% in comparison to an 8.1% rate for the Riverside MSA, a negative sign for the San Bernardino County economy but one that must be tempered by the fact that San Bernardino County has outperformed the Riverside MSA in the rate of job growth over the past two years. Population Compound Ann. % Chng 2010 Census 2020 Estimate 2025 Projection 2010 - 2020 2020 - 2025 Riverside et al, CA Metro 4,224,851 4,669,350 4,868,244 1.0%0.8% San Bernardino County, CA 2,035,210 2,192,262 2,269,996 0.7%0.7% Source: Claritas Population Trends G.7.p Packet Pg. 124 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) San Bernardino County Area Analysis 10 22747 Barton Road Employment Trends Total Employment (Year End)Unemployment Rate (Ann. Avg.) Year San Bernardino County % Change Riverside MSA % Change San Bernardino County Riverside MSA 2010 604,781 1,161,715 13.5%13.7% 2011 609,774 0.8%1,175,605 1.2% 12.9%13.0% 2012 629,173 3.2%1,214,765 3.3% 11.4%11.5% 2013 653,764 3.9%1,267,516 4.3% 9.8%9.9% 2014 695,240 6.3%1,336,977 5.5% 8.0%8.1% 2015 724,618 4.2%1,405,523 5.1% 6.5%6.6% 2016 727,494 0.4%1,434,303 2.0% 5.8%6.0% 2017 754,169 3.7%1,486,597 3.6% 4.9%5.1% 2018 773,530 2.6%1,526,649 2.7% 4.1%4.3% 2019 802,486 3.7%1,583,726 3.7% 3.8%4.0% 2020*749,294 -6.6%1,456,989 -8.0% 9.5%9.8% Overall Change 2010-2020 144,513 23.9%295,274 25.4% Avg Unemp. Rate 2010-2020 8.2%8.4% Unemployment Rate - February 2021 8.1%8.1% Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and Moody's Analytics. Employment figures are from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). Unemployment rates are from the Current Population Survey (CPS). The figures are not seasonally adjusted. *Total employment data is as of September 2020; unemployment rate data reflects the average of 12 months of 2020. Major employers in San Bernardino County are shown in the following table. Gross Domestic Product Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of economic activity based on the total value of goods and services produced in a defined geographic area, and annual changes in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are a gauge of economic growth. Name Number of Employees 1 County of San Bernardino 22,719 2 Stater Brothers 18,000 3 San Bernardino City Unified School District 6,400 4 BNSF Railway Co.1,000-4,999 5 California State University, San Bernardino 1,000-4,999 6 Saint Bernadine Medical Center 1,000-4,999 7 Community Hospital of San Bernardino 1,000-4,999 8 State of California, Department of Trnasportation 1,000-4,999 9 San Bernardino County Sheriff 1,000-4,999 10 City of San Bernardino 1,185 Major Employers - San Bernardino County, CA Source: EDD G.7.p Packet Pg. 125 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) San Bernardino County Area Analysis 11 22747 Barton Road Economic growth, as measured by annual changes in GDP, has been somewhat lower in San Bernardino County than the Riverside MSA overall during the past eight years. San Bernardino County has grown at a 3.7% average annual rate while the Riverside MSA has grown at a 3.8% rate. However, San Bernardino County has recently performed better than the Riverside MSA. GDP for San Bernardino County rose by 4.8% in 2019 while The Riverside MSA's GDP rose by 4.5%. San Bernardino County has a per capita GDP of $41,182, which is 11% greater than the Riverside MSA's GDP of $36,959. This means that San Bernardino County industries and employers are adding relatively more value to the economy than their counterparts in the Riverside MSA. Income, Education, and Age San Bernardino County has a lower level of household income than the Riverside MSA. The median household income for San Bernardino County is $66,272, which is 3.4% less than the corresponding figure for the Riverside MSA. Residents of San Bernardino County have a slightly lower level of educational attainment than those of the Riverside MSA. An estimated 20% of San Bernardino County residents are college graduates with four-year degrees, versus 21% of Riverside MSA residents. People in San Bernardino County are slightly younger than their Riverside MSA counterparts. The median age for San Bernardino County is 34 years, while the median age for the Riverside MSA is 35 years. Gross Domestic Product Year ($,000s) San Bernardino County % Change ($,000s) Riverside MSA % Change 2012 69,568,944 132,669,480 2013 71,527,029 2.8%137,405,833 3.6% 2014 74,712,409 4.5%143,289,193 4.3% 2015 78,517,804 5.1%151,135,822 5.5% 2016 81,034,922 3.2%155,513,808 2.9% 2017 83,564,142 3.1%160,344,031 3.1% 2018 85,684,738 2.5%164,487,230 2.6% 2019 89,779,198 4.8%171,884,061 4.5% Compound % Chg (2012-2019)3.7%3.8% GDP Per Capita 2019 $41,182 $36,959 Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and Moody's Analytics; data released December 2020. The release of state and local GDP data has a longer lag time than national data. The data represents inflation-adjusted ""real"" GDP stated in 2012 dollars. Median San Bernardino County, CA $66,272 Riverside et al, CA Metro $68,594 Comparison of San Bernardino County, CA to Riverside et al, CA Metro - 3.4% Source: Claritas Median Household Income - 2020 G.7.p Packet Pg. 126 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) San Bernardino County Area Analysis 12 22747 Barton Road Conclusion The San Bernardino County economy will be affected by a growing population base and lower income and education levels. San Bernardino County experienced growth in the number of jobs and has maintained a slightly lower unemployment rate than the Riverside MSA over the past decade. It is anticipated that the San Bernardino County economy will improve, and employment will grow, strengthening the demand for real estate. Education & Age - 2020 Source: Claritas 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% San Bernardino County, CARiverside et al, CA Metro 20%21% Percent College Graduate 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 San Bernardino County, CA Riverside et al, CA Metro 34 35 MedianAge G.7.p Packet Pg. 127 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) San Bernardino County Area Analysis 13 22747 Barton Road Area Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 128 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Surrounding Area 14 22747 Barton Road Surrounding Area Location The subject property is located on Barton Road, just west of City Hall. The neighborhood is generally bound by the Riverside (I-215) Freeway to the west, Grand Terrace Road to the north, the Blue Mountain to the east, and Van Buren Street to the south. Access and Linkages There are freeway on- and off-ramps to the Riverside (I-215) Freeway located to the west off of Barton Road, which were recently expanded. The neighborhood interior streets are primarily residential in nature. Commercial and industrial development in the subject area is mostly along Barton Road, the primary east/west arterial street. Overall, the primary mode of transportation in the area is the automobile. Demographics A demographic profile of the surrounding area, including population, households, and income data, is presented in the following table. As shown above, the current population within a 3-mile radius of the subject is 56,216, and the average household size is 3.0. Population in the area has grown since the 2010 census, and this trend is projected to continue over the next five years. Compared to San Bernardino County overall, the population within a 3-mile radius is projected to grow at a slower rate. Surrounding Area Demographics 2020 Estimates 1-Mile Radius 3-Mile Radius 5-Mile Radius San Bernardino County, CA Riverside et al, CA Metro Population 2010 13,347 53,505 197,297 2,035,210 4,224,851 Population 2020 13,634 56,216 207,617 2,192,262 4,669,350 Population 2025 13,793 57,335 212,323 2,269,996 4,868,244 Compound % Change 2010-2020 0.2%0.5%0.5%0.7%1.0% Compound % Change 2020-2025 0.2%0.4%0.4%0.7%0.8% Households 2010 4,858 17,640 57,757 611,618 1,297,878 Households 2020 4,965 18,625 60,700 650,492 1,416,867 Households 2025 5,024 19,004 62,025 671,440 1,472,802 Compound % Change 2010-2020 0.2%0.5%0.5%0.6%0.9% Compound % Change 2020-2025 0.2%0.4%0.4%0.6%0.8% Median Household Income 2020 $68,243 $61,946 $57,185 $66,272 $68,594 Average Household Size 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 College Graduate %25%24%22%20%21% Median Age 36 35 32 34 35 Owner Occupied %56%50%49%63%65% Renter Occupied %44%50%51%37%35% Median Owner Occupied Housing Value $373,989 $357,749 $336,234 $377,471 $396,918 Median Year Structure Built 1980 1980 1978 1982 1986 Average Travel Time to Work in Minutes 28 28 29 34 35 Source: Claritas G.7.p Packet Pg. 129 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Surrounding Area 15 22747 Barton Road The median household income is $61,946, which is lower than the household income for San Bernardino County. Residents within a 3-mile radius have a higher level of educational attainment than those of San Bernardino County, while median owner-occupied home values are lower. Land Use The neighborhood has adequate access to transportation corridors, shopping, schools, and community services. The neighborhood is not built out and still has many vacant sites available. The surrounding improvements include commercial uses, vacant land, and residential improvements. Immediately surrounding the subject are City Hall, Stater Brothers, fast food restaurants, a school and industrial uses near the freeway. The community is small and lightly populated. No atypical conditions exist in the subject neighborhood that would appear to negatively impact the site. Outlook and Conclusions The area is in the growth stage of its life cycle. We anticipate that property values will remain stable in the near future. G.7.p Packet Pg. 130 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Surrounding Area 16 22747 Barton Road Surrounding Area Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 131 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 17 22747 Barton Road Office Market Analysis Metro Area Overview The subject is located in the San Bernardino/Riverside metro area as defined by REIS. Supply and demand indicators, including inventory levels, absorption, vacancy, and rental rates for all classes of space are presented in the ensuing table. San Bernardino/Riverside Metro Trends and Forecasts  The current vacancy rate in the metro area is 17.1%; the vacancy rate has decreased by 270 bps from 2015.  Four-year forecasts project a vacancy rate of 19.0% for the metro area, representing an increase of 190 bps by year-end 2025. San Bernardino/Riverside Office Market Trends and Forecasts Year Inventory (SF) Occupied (SF) Vacancy (SF) Vacancy (%) Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Effective Rent ($/SF) Effective Rental Rate (% Change) Gross Revenue ($/SF) % Office Employmen t 2010 19,944,000 15,182,000 4,762,000 23.9%0 262,000 $17.05 -2.6%$16.26 28.0% 2011 19,781,000 15,190,000 4,591,000 23.2%0 8,000 $17.05 0.0%$16.38 27.6% 2012 19,713,000 15,320,000 4,393,000 22.3%140,000 130,000 $17.00 -0.3%$16.54 27.0% 2013 19,713,000 15,522,000 4,191,000 21.3%0 202,000 $16.97 -0.2%$16.72 26.6% 2014 19,607,000 15,456,000 4,151,000 21.2%48,000 -66,000 $17.22 1.5%$16.98 26.6% 2015 19,640,000 15,746,000 3,894,000 19.8%58,000 290,000 $17.52 1.7%$17.55 26.4% 2016 19,411,000 16,050,000 3,361,000 17.3%52,000 304,000 $17.69 1.0%$18.21 25.7% 2017 19,441,000 16,143,000 3,298,000 17.0%30,000 93,000 $18.09 2.3%$18.69 25.4% 2018 19,441,000 16,180,000 3,261,000 16.8%0 37,000 $18.44 1.9%$19.08 25.2% 2019 19,461,000 16,240,000 3,221,000 16.6%0 60,000 $18.70 1.4%$19.39 25.2% 2020 19,461,000 16,133,000 3,328,000 17.1%0 -107,000 $18.55 -0.8%$19.35 25.4% 2021 19,441,000 15,728,000 3,713,000 19.1%0 -405,000 $17.69 -4.6%$18.41 25.2% 2022 19,441,000 15,653,000 3,788,000 19.5%0 -75,000 $17.72 0.2%$18.36 25.2% 2023 19,599,000 15,709,000 3,890,000 19.8%158,000 56,000 $17.98 1.5%$18.48 25.2% 2024 19,823,000 15,978,000 3,845,000 19.4%224,000 269,000 $18.29 1.7%$18.82 25.2% 2025 20,059,000 16,242,000 3,817,000 19.0%236,000 264,000 $18.65 2.0%$19.17 25.2% 2010 - 2020 Average 19,601,182 15,742,000 3,859,182 19.7%29,818 110,273 $17.66 0.5%$17.74 26.3% Source: Moody's Analytics REIS. Compiled by Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% $16.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 $19.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Vacancy Rate vs. Effective Rental Rate Effective Rent ($/SF)Vacancy (%) G.7.p Packet Pg. 132 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 18 22747 Barton Road  Effective rent averages $18.55/SF in the metro area; future rent values are expected to increase by 0.5% to $18.65/SF by year-end 2025.  The inventory in the metro area has decreased by 0.9% from 2015, while the occupied stock has increased by 2.5%.  Between 2015 and 2020, completions averaged 23,333 SF annually and reached a peak of 58,000 SF in 2015.  Between 2015 and 2020, absorption figures reached a peak of 304,000 SF in 2016 and a low of -107,000 SF in 2020.  25.4% of the labor force in the metro area work in office properties and this employment rate decreased by 1.06% between 2015 and 2020. Class B/C Office Overview If the site were developed for office use, the subject would be a Class B/C property as defined by REIS. Supply and demand indicators, including inventory levels, absorption, vacancy, and rental rates for all Class B/C space in the San Bernardino/Riverside metro area are presented in the following table. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% -500,000 -400,000 -300,000 -200,000 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Supply and Demand Trends Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Vacancy (%) G.7.p Packet Pg. 133 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 19 22747 Barton Road Class B/C Office Trends and Insights  The current vacancy rate for Class B/C properties in the metro area is 16.4%; the vacancy rate has decreased by 250 bps from 2015.  Asking rent currently averages $18.96/SF and has increased by 5.9% from 2015. `San Bernardino/Riverside Office Class B/C Market Trends Year Inventory (SF) Occupancy (SF) Vacancy (SF) Vacancy (%) Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Asking Rent ($/SF) Asking Rental Rate (% Change) Gross Revenue ($/SF) 2010 9,785,000 7,661,000 2,124,000 21.7%0 -119,000 $17.33 -2.9%$13.57 2011 9,693,000 7,633,000 2,060,000 21.3%0 -28,000 $17.33 0.0%$13.65 2012 9,485,000 7,574,000 1,911,000 20.1%0 -59,000 $17.18 -0.9%$13.72 2013 9,485,000 7,629,000 1,856,000 19.6%0 55,000 $17.25 0.4%$13.87 2014 9,331,000 7,369,000 1,962,000 21.0%0 -260,000 $17.50 1.4%$13.82 2015 9,306,000 7,549,000 1,757,000 18.9%0 180,000 $17.90 2.3%$14.52 2016 9,025,000 7,578,000 1,447,000 16.0%0 29,000 $17.86 -0.2%$15.00 2017 9,025,000 7,548,000 1,477,000 16.4%0 -30,000 $18.18 1.8%$15.20 2018 9,025,000 7,494,000 1,531,000 17.0%0 -54,000 $18.65 2.6%$15.49 2019 9,025,000 7,507,000 1,518,000 16.8%0 13,000 $18.89 1.3%$15.71 2020 9,025,000 7,548,000 1,477,000 16.4%0 41,000 $18.96 0.4%$15.86 2010 - 2020 Average 9,291,818 7,553,636 1,738,182 18.7%0 -21,091 $17.91 0.6%$14.58 Source: Moody's Analytics REIS. Compiled by Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% $16.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 $19.00 $19.50 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Vacancy Rate vs. Asking Rental Rate Asking Rent…Vacancy (%) G.7.p Packet Pg. 134 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 20 22747 Barton Road  Class B/C metro area inventory has decreased by 3.0% from 2015, while the occupied stock has decreased by 0.0%.  There have not been any Class B/C completions in the metro area between 2015 and 2020.  Between 2015 and 2020, absorption figures reached a peak of 180,000 SF in 2015 and a low of -54,000 SF in 2018.  Between 2015 and 2020, gross revenue for Class B/C properties in the metro area averaged $15.30/SF and has increased by 9.2%. Submarket Overview In comparison with other submarkets in the region, the Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino submarket is rated as follows: Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Submarket Trends and Forecasts Supply and demand indicators for all classes of space in the Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino submarket are displayed in the following table. Source: ©Reis Services, LLC 2021. Reprinted with the permission of Reis Services, LLC. All rights reserved. 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% -300,000 -200,000 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Supply and Demand Trends Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Vacancy (%) Submarket Attribute Ratings Market Size/Stature Average Market Demand Decreasing Vacancy Trends Increasing Threat of New Supply Average Rental Trends Decreasing G.7.p Packet Pg. 135 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 21 22747 Barton Road  The current vacancy rate in the submarket is 24.2%; the vacancy rate has decreased by 120 bps from 2015.  Four-year forecasts project a vacancy rate of 30.6% for the submarket, representing an increase of 640 bps by year-end 2025.  Effective rent averages $16.69/SF in the submarket; future rent values are expected to decrease by 4.1% to $16.01/SF by year-end 2025. Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Office Submarket Trends and Forecasts Year Inventory (SF) Occupancy (SF) Vacancy (SF) Vacancy (%) Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Effective Rent ($/SF) Effective Rental Rate (% Change) Gross Revenue ($/SF) 2010 5,523,000 4,380,000 1,143,000 20.7%0 -39,000 $15.51 -1.9%$15.73 2011 5,523,000 4,336,000 1,187,000 21.5%0 -44,000 $15.64 0.8%$15.69 2012 5,523,000 4,319,000 1,204,000 21.8%0 -17,000 $15.54 -0.6%$15.54 2013 5,523,000 4,264,000 1,259,000 22.8%0 -55,000 $15.53 -0.1%$15.33 2014 5,523,000 4,142,000 1,381,000 25.0%0 -122,000 $15.54 0.1%$14.89 2015 5,523,000 4,120,000 1,403,000 25.4%0 -22,000 $15.74 1.3%$15.00 2016 5,483,000 4,222,000 1,261,000 23.0%0 102,000 $15.84 0.6%$15.59 2017 5,483,000 4,238,000 1,245,000 22.7%0 16,000 $16.16 2.0%$15.93 2018 5,483,000 4,173,000 1,310,000 23.9%0 -65,000 $16.56 2.5%$16.06 2019 5,483,000 4,178,000 1,305,000 23.8%0 5,000 $16.67 0.7%$16.20 2020 5,483,000 4,156,000 1,327,000 24.2%0 -22,000 $16.69 0.1%$16.30 2021 5,483,000 4,074,000 1,409,000 25.7%0 -82,000 $15.35 -8.0%$15.47 2022 5,483,000 3,952,000 1,531,000 27.9%0 -122,000 $15.36 0.1%$15.02 2023 5,506,000 3,846,000 1,660,000 30.2%23,000 -106,000 $15.54 1.2%$14.66 2024 5,537,000 3,860,000 1,677,000 30.3%31,000 14,000 $15.77 1.5%$14.74 2025 5,570,000 3,869,000 1,701,000 30.6%33,000 9,000 $16.01 1.5%$14.77 2010 - 2020 Average 5,504,818 4,229,818 1,275,000 23.2%0 -23,909 $15.95 0.5%$15.66 Source: Moody's Analytics REIS. Compiled by Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% $0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Vacancy Rate vs. Effective Rental Rate Market Effective Rent ($/SF)Submarket Effective Rent ($/SF) Market Vacancy %Submarket Vacancy % G.7.p Packet Pg. 136 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 22 22747 Barton Road  The current inventory level of 5,483,000 SF is expected to increase by 1.6% through year-end 2025.  The inventory in the submarket has decreased by 0.7% from 2015, while the occupied stock has increased by 0.9%.  There have not been any completions in the submarket between 2015 and 2020.  Between 2015 and 2020, absorption figures reached a peak of 102,000 SF in 2016 and a low of -65,000 SF in 2018. Class B/C Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Submarket Trends and Insights Supply and demand indicators, including inventory levels, absorption, vacancy, and rental rates for Class B/C space in the submarket are presented in the following table. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% -150,000 -100,000 -50,000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Supply and Demand Trends Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Vacancy (%) Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Office Class B/C Submarket Trends Year Inventory (SF) Occupancy (SF) Vacancy (SF) Vacancy (%) Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Asking Rent ($/SF) Asking Rental Rate (% Change) Gross Revenue ($/SF) 2010 3,507,000 2,735,000 772,000 22.0%0 3,000 $16.97 -2.10%$13.23 2011 3,507,000 2,693,000 814,000 23.2%0 -42,000 $17.07 0.60%$13.11 2012 3,507,000 2,712,000 795,000 22.7%0 19,000 $16.79 -1.60%$12.98 2013 3,507,000 2,681,000 826,000 23.5%0 -31,000 $16.87 0.50%$12.90 2014 3,507,000 2,593,000 914,000 26.1%0 -88,000 $16.90 0.20%$12.50 2015 3,507,000 2,602,000 905,000 25.8%0 9,000 $17.22 1.90%$12.78 2016 3,467,000 2,648,000 819,000 23.6%0 46,000 $17.27 0.30%$13.19 2017 3,467,000 2,668,000 799,000 23.0%0 20,000 $17.60 1.90%$13.54 2018 3,467,000 2,556,000 911,000 26.3%0 -112,000 $18.33 4.10%$13.51 2019 3,467,000 2,590,000 877,000 25.3%0 34,000 $18.44 0.60%$13.78 2020 3,467,000 2,564,000 903,000 26.1%0 -26,000 $18.67 1.20%$13.81 2010 - 2020 Average 3,488,818 2,640,182 848,636 24.3%0 -15,273 $17.47 0.69%$13.21 Source: Moody's Analytics REIS. Compiled by Integra Realty Resources, Inc. G.7.p Packet Pg. 137 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 23 22747 Barton Road  The current vacancy for Class B/C properties in the submarket area is 26.1%; the vacancy rate has increased by 30 bps from 2015.  Asking rent currently averages $18.67/SF and has increased by 8.4% from 2015.  Class B/C submarket inventory has decreased by 1.1% from 2015, while the occupied stock has decreased by 1.5%.  There have not been any Class B/C completions in the submarket between 2015 and 2020.  Between 2015 and 2020, absorption figures reached a peak of 46,000 SF in 2016 and a low of - 112,000 SF in 2018. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS $15.50 $16.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 $19.00 $19.50 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Vacancy Rate Vs Asking Rental Rate Market Class Asking Rent ($/SF)Submarket Class Asking Rent ($/SF) Market Class Vacancy %Submarket Class Vacancy % Source: ©Reis Services, LLC 2021. Reprinted with the permission of Reis Services, LLC. All rights reserved. 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% 22.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 27.0% -120,000 -100,000 -80,000 -60,000 -40,000 -20,000 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Supply and Demand Trends Completions (SF) Absorption (SF) Vacancy (%) G.7.p Packet Pg. 138 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 24 22747 Barton Road  Between 2015 and 2020, gross revenue for Class B/C properties in the submarket area averaged $13.44/SF and increased by 8.1%. New and Proposed Construction The following charts summarize the properties that have been completed in the San Bernardino/Riverside metro area. Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 347 18 44 53 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Corona/Riverside/Moreno Valley Temecula Valley/Murrieta Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Palm Springs/Palm Desert Thousands Total Completions (SF in Thousands) by Submarket Source: Moody's Analytics REIS 1 1 1 2 0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 < 25,000 SF 25,000-49,999 SF 50,000-99,999 SF 100,000-249,999 SF 250,000-499,999 SF 500,000+ SF Total Projects Completed by Building Size G.7.p Packet Pg. 139 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 25 22747 Barton Road The following table summarizes properties that are under construction, planned, and/or proposed in the San Bernardino/Riverside metro area. San Bernardino/Riverside Office Construction Insights  There are 3 properties under construction, 7 properties in the planned construction phase, and 25 properties in the proposed construction phase in the metro area.  Office properties within the planned construction phase have an average size of 52,127 SF and range in size between 60,000 SF and 60,000 SF.  Medical Office properties within the proposed construction phase have an average size of 52,808 SF.  Of the 155,212 SF under construction, 21.52% are Office properties, 7.30% are Medical Office properties, and 71.18% are Office-Owner Occupied properties.  Of the 337,351 SF planned for construction, 77.26% are Office properties, 4.95% are Medical Office properties, and 17.79% are Office-Owner Occupied properties.  Of the 1,340,647 SF proposed for construction, 48.79% are Office properties, 51.21% are Medical Office properties, and 0.0% are Office-Owner Occupied properties. The following table summarizes properties that are under construction, planned, and/or proposed in the Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino submarket. San Bernardino/Riverside Office Construction by Phase and Subtype Properties Sq. Ft. Properties Sq. Ft. Properties Sq. Ft. Office 1 33,408 5 260,637 12 654,138 Medical Office 1 11,325 1 16,714 13 686,509 Government Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office--Owner Occ.1 110,479 1 60,000 0 0 Office Condominiums 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 3 155,212 7 337,351 25 1,340,647 Office Subproperty Type Under Construction Planned Construction Proposed Construction Source: Moody's Analytics REIS G.7.p Packet Pg. 140 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Office Market Analysis 26 22747 Barton Road Office Market Outlook and Conclusions Based on the key metro and submarket area trends, construction outlook, and the performance of competing properties, IRR expects the mix of property fundamentals and economic conditions in the San Bernardino metro area to have a neutral impact on the areas performance in the near term. Overall, the City is performing below the County. Colton/Redlands/San Bernardino Submarket Construction by Phase and Subtype Properties Sq. Ft. Properties Sq. Ft. Properties Sq. Ft. Office 0 0 1 113,000 1 7,198 Medical Office 1 11,325 2 16,714 1 50,012 Government Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office--Owner Occ.1 110,479 0 0 0 0 Office Condominiums 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 2 121,804 3 129,714 2 57,210 Office Subproperty Type Under Construction Planned Construction Proposed Construction Source: Moody's Analytics REIS G.7.p Packet Pg. 141 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) COVID-19 Impact on Current Valuations 27 22747 Barton Road COVID-19 Impact on Current Valuations Transaction indicators are the best measure of any impact on values due to COVID-19. At the beginning of the pandemic, many transactions were tabled, and market data was scarce. After an initial lull in activity, price discovery has occurred in many markets across different property types and transactions are getting done. Market instability remains a factor on various levels: Based on discussions and interviews with a wide range of market participants including brokers, lenders, asset managers, owners, property managers and others, a variety of concerns, and opportunities, are apparent. The Virus A surge in COVID-19 cases throughout the country began in 4Q20. Infection rates are exploding with many state and local governments restricting movement and social gatherings. The stock market rose to new highs in 4Q20 on the news of multiple promising vaccine options expected to first become widely available to health care workers and then the general public by mid-2021. In the interim, volatility will remain with starts and stops in economic activity. A widely distributed vaccine is critical for bringing workers back to the office; for allowing public schools to remain open with consistency; and for perceived safe use of public transportation in getting people to work. Macro-Economic Impacts Not surprisingly, 3Q20 GDP was up significantly but varies considerably by segment. Consumption of goods is up while consumption of services remains off, due in large part to households remaining in various levels of lockdown in many parts of the country. Warehouses and manufacturing are winners. Hotels, retail, and restaurants remain weak. State and local finances are troubling not to mention the outlook for employers and workers, particularly in the service sector, who remain on the downside of a K shaped recovery. After initially ramping up cash reserves to cover bad loans, many larger lending institutions have begun reducing those set-asides as the expectation of losses is on the decline. Many smaller to mid- Property Level Operating impairment Nonpayment of RentIncreased Vacancy Liquidity duration Fundamental Economic Fear Re-Pricing Risk (Debt and Equity) Reduction in Listing Activity Market Level G.7.p Packet Pg. 142 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) COVID-19 Impact on Current Valuations 28 22747 Barton Road size banks, which have typically been the primary capital source to local, service-oriented businesses, may not be so fortunate. Market Sentiment/Participant Interviews In addition to transaction data, which is slowly materializing, we look to market participants (developers, investors, lenders, brokers) as a leading indicator of where the market is currently, and where they believe the market is heading. Following is a summary of key interviews undertaken: Market Participant Survey Respondent Commentary Name V. Onorio Company Lee & Associates Name J. Tavisola Company Tavisola & Associates There is limited demand for commercial sites in Grand Terrace. Values have remained stable for the past few years. Beginning to see buyer interest, especially from speculative buyers. Values are stable. G.7.p Packet Pg. 143 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 29 22747 Barton Road Property Analysis Land Description and Analysis Land Description Land Area 0.33 acres; 14,375 SF Source of Land Area Public Records Primary Street Frontage Barton - 100 feet Shape Irregular Corner No Topography Generally level and at street grade Drainage No problems reported or observed Environmental Hazards None reported or observed Ground Stability No problems reported or observed Flood Area Panel Number 06071C8691J Date June 9, 2016 Zone X Description Outside of 500-year floodplain Insurance Required?No Zoning; Other Regulations Zoning Jurisdiction City of Grand Terrace Zoning Designation BRSP Description Barton Road Specific Plan Legally Conforming?Appears to be legally conforming Zoning Change Likely?No Permitted Uses Professional/Administrative offices Minimum Lot Area 10000 Minimum Street Frontage (Feet)60 Minimum Setbacks (Feet)Front - 15'; Side - 10'; Rear - 10' Maximum Building Height 28' Maximum Site Coverage 100% less parking, setback and landscaping Utilities Service Provider Water City of Grand Terrace Sewer City of Grand Terrace Electricity Southern California Edison Natural Gas Souther California Gas Co. Local Phone Various G.7.p Packet Pg. 144 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 30 22747 Barton Road The subject property is located in Planning Area 3 of the Barton Road Specific Plan (BRSP). The following is an excerpt from the BRSP. Planning Area 3 is anchored by the City Hall and consists primarily of small office uses. West of City Hall uses are predominantly residential with a mixture of single-family and multiple-family dwellings. The main emphasis for Planning Area 3 will be the continued development of office uses and support service commercial uses. In recognizing the presence of existing multi-family residential projects south of Barton Road along side streets within the Planning Area, such uses will be permitted to remain, and in-fill properties allowed to develop subject to strict design standards and permitting processes. Special provisions are provided for the development of infill multi-family properties. Opportunities exist to consolidate some single-family lots for office development. This land use district is intended to accommodate professional/administrative office uses and personal service uses as opposed to other commercial retail uses. Typically, uses include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, and copy centers. Other consistent uses include executive, management, administrative, or clerical uses, including the establishment of branch offices, data processing centers, and the provision of professional consulting services. Service commercial uses may include restaurants, repair services, and retail commercial uses that cater to businesses and their employees. We are not experts in the interpretation of zoning ordinances. An appropriately qualified land use attorney should be engaged if a determination of compliance with zoning is required. Easements, Encroachments, and Restrictions We were not provided a current title report to review. We are not aware of any easements, encroachments, or restrictions that would adversely affect value. Our valuation assumes no adverse impacts from easements, encroachments, or restrictions, and further assumes that the subject has a clear and marketable title. Conclusion of Land Analysis Overall, the physical characteristics of the site and the availability of utilities result in functional utility suitable for a variety of uses including those permitted by zoning and the General Plan. We are not aware of any other particular restrictions on development. G.7.p Packet Pg. 145 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 31 22747 Barton Road Subject, south from Barton Road (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) Subject, south from Barton Road (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) Subject, northeast from an adjacent property (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) Subject, north from an adjacent property (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) Facing east on Barton Road. City Hall on the right. (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) Facing west on Barton Road (Photo Taken on April 1, 2021) G.7.p Packet Pg. 146 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 32 22747 Barton Road Aerial Photograph G.7.p Packet Pg. 147 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 33 22747 Barton Road Plat Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 148 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 34 22747 Barton Road Flood Hazard Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 149 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Description and Analysis 35 22747 Barton Road Zoning Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 150 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Real Estate Taxes 36 22747 Barton Road Real Estate Taxes Real estate tax assessments are administered by the Assessor of San Bernardino County and are estimated by jurisdiction on a county basis for the subject. The property is subject to the property tax rules of the State of California, which control the activities and policies of local assessment jurisdictions. These laws were significantly modified on June 7, 1978, when the State’s voters passed Proposition 13, amending Article XIII of the State Constitution. Proposition 13 abolished the practice of periodic reassessment of properties based on market value appraisals. Instead, real property is subject to reassessment (i.e., revaluation at full or partial current market value) only when changes in ownership or new construction take place. Otherwise, increases in assessed value are limited to a general rate of 2%, plus the rates needed to service any bonded indebtedness. Special assessments can also be added and are often related to the installation of infrastructure. Generally speaking, property taxes in San Bernardino County tend to range from 1.0% to 1.5% of a property’s assessed value. Due to California’s tax laws, most properties within the county have very similar effective tax rates. The subject property is owned by the City of Grand Terrace and is exempt from taxes. Taxes and Assessments - Assessed Value Taxes and Assessments Tax ID Land Improvements Total Tax Rate Ad Valorem Taxes Direct Assessments Total 0276-202-54 $0 $0 $0 Exempt $0 $0 $0 G.7.p Packet Pg. 151 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Highest and Best Use 37 22747 Barton Road Highest and Best Use The highest and best use of a property is the reasonably probable use resulting in the highest value and represents the use of an asset that maximizes its productivity. Process Before a property can be valued, an opinion of highest and best use must be developed for the subject site, both as though vacant, and as improved or proposed. By definition, the highest and best use must be:  Physically possible.  Legally permissible under the zoning regulations and other restrictions that apply to the site.  Financially feasible.  Maximally productive, i.e., capable of producing the highest value from among the permissible, possible, and financially feasible uses. As Vacant Physically Possible The physical characteristics of the site do not appear to impose any unusual restrictions on development. Overall, the physical characteristics of the site and the availability of utilities result in functional utility suitable for a variety of uses Legally Permissible The site is zoned BRSP, Barton Road Specific Plan. Permitted uses include Professional/Administrative offices. There are no apparent legal restrictions, such as easements or deed restrictions, effectively limiting the use of the property. Given prevailing land use patterns in the area, only future office use is given further consideration in determining the highest and best use of the site, as though vacant. Financially Feasible Based on our analysis of the market, there is limited demand for additional office development at the current time. It appears that a newly developed office use on the site would not have a value commensurate with its cost; therefore, office use is not considered to be financially feasible. Nevertheless, we expect an eventual recovery of the market accompanied by a rise in property values to a level that will justify the cost of new construction. Thus, it is anticipated that office development will become financially feasible in the future. Maximally Productive There does not appear to be any reasonably probable use of the site that would generate a higher residual land value than holding the property for future development of an office use. Accordingly, it is our opinion that holding the property for future office use, based on the normal market density level permitted by zoning, is the maximally productive use of the property. G.7.p Packet Pg. 152 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Highest and Best Use 38 22747 Barton Road Conclusion. Holding the property for future development of a future office use is the only use that meets the four tests of highest and best use. Therefore, it is concluded to be the highest and best use of the property as if vacant As Improved No improvements are situated on the subject. Therefore, the highest and best analysis as improved is not applicable. Most Probable Buyer Taking into account the size and characteristics of the property the likely buyer is a speculator or developer. G.7.p Packet Pg. 153 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation Methodology 39 22747 Barton Road Valuation Valuation Methodology Appraisers usually consider three approaches to estimating the market value of real property. These are the cost approach, sales comparison approach, and the income capitalization approach. The cost approach assumes that the informed purchaser would pay no more than the cost of producing a substitute property with the same utility. This approach is particularly applicable when the improvements being appraised are relatively new and represent the highest and best use of the land or when the property has unique or specialized improvements for which there is little or no sales data from comparable properties. The sales comparison approach assumes that an informed purchaser would pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring another existing property with the same utility. This approach is especially appropriate when an active market provides sufficient reliable data. The sales comparison approach is less reliable in an inactive market or when estimating the value of properties for which no directly comparable sales data is available. The sales comparison approach is often relied upon for owner-user properties. The income capitalization approach reflects the market’s perception of a relationship between a property’s potential income and its market value. This approach converts the anticipated net income from ownership of a property into a value indication through capitalization. The primary methods are direct capitalization and discounted cash flow analysis, with one or both methods applied, as appropriate. This approach is widely used in appraising income-producing properties. Reconciliation of the various indications into a conclusion of value is based on an evaluation of the quantity and quality of available data in each approach and the applicability of each approach to the property type. The methodology employed in this assignment is summarized as follows: Approaches to Value Approach Applicability to Subject Use in Assignment Cost Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized Sales Comparison Approach Applicable Utilized Income Capitalization Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized G.7.p Packet Pg. 154 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 40 22747 Barton Road Sales Comparison Approach To develop an opinion of the subject’s land value, as if vacant and available to be developed to its highest and best use, we utilize the sales comparison approach. Our search for comparable sales focused on transactions within the following parameters:  Location: San Bernardino County  Size: Under one acre  Use: Commercial use  Transaction Date: January 1, 2019 through the effective date For this analysis, we use price per square foot as the appropriate unit of comparison because market participants typically compare sale prices and property values on this basis. The most relevant sales are summarized in the following table. G.7.p Packet Pg. 155 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 41 22747 Barton Road Summary of Comparable Land Sales No. Name/Address Sale Date; Status Effective Sale Price SF; Acres Zoning $/SF Land 1 233 S La Cadena Sep-20 $125,000 15,002 $8.33 Colton Closed 0.34 San Bernardino County CA 2 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave Aug-20 $183,000 17,249 $10.61 Colton Closed 0.40 San Bernardino County CA 3 0.76-Acre Commercial Land Apr-20 $220,000 33,001 $6.67 439 W. Base Line St Closed 0.76 San Bernardino San Bernardino County CA 4 La Crosse Ave s/o Barton Rd Dec-19 $450,000 38,768 $11.61 Grand Terrace Closed 0.89 San Bernardino County CA 5 Barton Rd Mar-19 $400,000 34,848 $11.48 Barton Rd, w/o Vivienda Ave Closed 0.80 Grand Terrace San Bernardino County CA Subject 14,375 22747 Barton Road 0.33 Grand Terrace, CA CG-1 C2, General Commercial Commercial Commercial Barton Road Specific Plan Comments: This is a corner site located at the SWC of La Cadena & L Street. La Cadena is a secondary commercial artery, with residential uses on either side. The location is a short distance south of the access to Interstate 10. The site was on the market for five months with an original asking price of $155,000. There are two curb cuts on La Cadena and one on L Street. Buyer's intent is not known, but the location would suggest a future service related Comments: This sale includes two parcels, 0164-021-32 & 33. The site is at the SEC of Mt. Vernon Avenue & Hillcrest Avenue. A flood control channel extends on the north side of Hillcrest Avenue. Mt. Vernon has good traffic levels in this location and there is a mixture of small commercial businesses, retail and fast food restaurants nearby, There is a billboard on site, terms could not be verified. Comments: Vacant previously developed commercial lot located at a corner. The site is adjacent to a small neighborhood market as well as other neighborhood commercial services. The property was on the market for Comments: The property is located along the west side of La Crosse Avenue, just south of Barton Road. Surrounding land uses are primarily industrial and limited commercial. Vic Onorio, the broker who represented both the buyer and seller, confirmed that the transaction was arm's-length and that no conditions affected the sale price. Mr. Onorio indicated that the buyer purchased the property with the intention of eventually developing it with a commercial use, but they were in no rush to do so. The site was not entitled at the time of sale. Comments: Purchase of a vacant commercial lot, located midblock on Barton Road, west of Vivienda Avenue. The buyers plans are unknown. GC G.7.p Packet Pg. 156 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 42 22747 Barton Road Comparable Land Sales Map G.7.p Packet Pg. 157 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 43 22747 Barton Road Sale 1 233 S La Cadena Sale 2 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave Sale 3 439 W Baseline St Sale 4 La Crosse Ave, s/o Barton Rd Sale 5 Barton Rd, e/o Vivienda Ave G.7.p Packet Pg. 158 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 44 22747 Barton Road Analysis and Adjustment of Sales The sales are compared to the subject and adjusted to account for material differences that affect value. Adjustments are considered for the following factors, in the sequence shown below. Adjustment Factor Accounts For Comments Effective Sale Price Atypical economics of a transaction, such as demolition cost or expenditures by a buyer at time of purchase. No adjustments were required. Real Property Rights Fee simple, leased fee, leasehold, partial interest, etc. All sales involved the acquisition of the fee simple interest. No adjustments were required. Financing Terms Seller financing, or assumption of existing financing, at non-market terms. All sales were sold for cash or cash equivalent terms. No adjustments were required. Conditions of Sale Extraordinary motivation of buyer or seller, assemblage, forced sale. No adjustments were required. Market Conditions Changes in the economic environment over time that affect the appreciation and depreciation of real estate. All of the sales have occurred between March 2019 and September 2020. It is generally understood that this market flattened after 2018. No adjustments have been made for Market Conditions. Location Market or submarket area influences on sale price; surrounding land use influences. All of the sales are considered similar in terms of location. Access/Exposure Convenience to transportation facilities; ease of site access; visibility; traffic counts. The subject is located on a major street. All of the sales, except Sale 4, offer similar access to major streets. Sale 4 has freeway frontage and is superior. A downward adjustment is made. Size An inverse relationship that often exists between parcel size and unit value. The sales are considered similar in terms of size, and no adjustments are made. Shape and Topography Primary physical factors that affect the utility of a site for its highest and best use. The subject site is irregular but generally trapezoidal. The sales are considered similar. No adjustments are required. G.7.p Packet Pg. 159 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 45 22747 Barton Road Adjustment Factor Accounts For Comments Zoning Government regulations that affect the types and intensities of uses allowable on a site. The subject is zoned for office use. All of the sales allow for multiple commercial uses and are superior in terms of zoning. Downward adjustments were required. Entitlements The specific level of governmental approvals attained pertaining to the development of a site. All of the sales were speculative transactions. None of the sales had approvals in place at the time of sale. G.7.p Packet Pg. 160 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 46 22747 Barton Road The following table summarizes the adjustments we make to each sale. Land Sales Adjustment Grid Subject Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Comparable 4 Comparable 5 Address 22747 Barton Rd. 233 S. La Cadena 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave 439 W. Base Line St La Crosse Ave s/o Barton Rd Barton Rd, w/o Vivienda Ave City Grand Terrace Colton Colton San Bernardino Grand Terrace Grand Terrace County San Bernardino San Bernardino San Bernardino San Bernardino San Bernardino San Bernardino State California CA CA CA CA CA Sale Date Sep-20 Aug-20 Apr-20 Dec-19 Mar-19 Sale Status Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Sale Price $125,000 $183,000 $220,000 $450,000 $400,000 Effective Sale Price $125,000 $183,000 $220,000 $450,000 $400,000 Square Feet 14,375 15,002 17,249 33,001 38,768 34,848 Acres 0.33 0.34 0.40 0.76 0.89 0.80 $8.33 $10.61 $6.67 $11.61 $11.48 Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple––––– Cash to seller Cash to seller Cash to seller Cash to seller Cash to seller ––––– None None None None None ––––– Market Conditions 4/1/2021 Sep-20 Aug-20 Apr-20 Dec-19 Mar-19Annual % Adjustment ––––– $8.33 $10.61 $6.67 $11.61 $11.48––––– –––-10%– ––––– ––––– -5%-5%-5%-5%-5% Net $ Adjustment -$0.42 -$0.53 -$0.33 -$1.74 -$0.57 Net % Adjustment -5%-5%-5%-15%-5% Final Adjusted Price $7.92 $10.08 $6.33 $9.87 $10.90 Overall Adjustment -5%-5%-5%-15%-5% Average Indicated Value $6.33 - $10.90 $9.02 $10.00 Zoning Access/Exposure Size Price per Square Foot Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Cumulative Adjusted Price % Adjustment % Adjustment % Adjustment Location Shape and Topography Range of Adjusted Prices G.7.p Packet Pg. 161 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Sales Comparison Approach 47 22747 Barton Road Land Value Conclusion Before adjustment, the sales reflect a range of $6.67 - $11.61 per square foot. After adjustment, the range is adjusted to $6.33 - $10.90 per square foot, with an average of $9.02 per square foot. We give the greatest weight to sales 4 and 5, and arrive at a land value conclusion as follows: Land Value Conclusion Indicated Value per Square Foot $10.00 Subject Square Feet 14,375 Indicated Value $143,750 Rounded $144,000 G.7.p Packet Pg. 162 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Reconciliation and Conclusion of Value 48 22747 Barton Road Reconciliation and Conclusion of Value As discussed previously, we use only the sales comparison approach in developing an opinion of value for the subject. The cost and income approaches are not applicable and are not used. Based on the preceding valuation analysis and subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions expressed in the report, our value opinion follows: Value Conclusion Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value Conclusion Market Value Fee Simple April 1, 2021 $144,000 Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 1. None 1. None The use of any extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition may have affected the assignment results. The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions. A hypothetical condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions. An extraordinary assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. The value conclusion in this report considers the impact of COVID-19 on the subject property. Exposure Time Exposure time is the length of time the subject property would have been exposed for sale in the market had it sold on the effective valuation date at the concluded market value. Exposure time is always presumed to precede the effective date of the appraisal. Based on our review of recent sales transactions for similar properties and our analysis of supply and demand in the local market, it is our opinion that the probable exposure time for the subject at the concluded market value stated previously is 12 months. Marketing Time Marketing time is an estimate of the amount of time it might take to sell a property at the concluded market value immediately following the effective date of value. As we foresee no significant changes in market conditions in the near term, it is our opinion that a reasonable marketing period for the subject is likely to be the same as the exposure time. Accordingly, we estimate the subject’s marketing period at 12 months. G.7.p Packet Pg. 163 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 49 22747 Barton Road Certification We certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest concerning the parties involved. 4. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three years immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. 5. We have no bias concerning the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 6. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 7. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 8. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as well as applicable state appraisal regulations. 9. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 10. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 11. Stephanie Kavanaugh made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS, has not personally inspected the subject. 12. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification. 13. We have experience in appraising properties similar to the subject and comply with the Competency Rule of USPAP. G.7.p Packet Pg. 164 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 50 22747 Barton Road 14. As of the date of this report J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS, has completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. Stephanie Kavanaugh California Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #AG030565 J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS California Certified Real Estate Appraiser #AG008427 G.7.p Packet Pg. 165 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 51 22747 Barton Road Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This appraisal and any other work product related to this engagement are limited by the following standard assumptions, except as otherwise noted in the report: 1. The title is marketable and free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, encroachments, easements, and restrictions. The property is under responsible ownership and competent management and is available for its highest and best use. 2. There are no existing judgments or pending or threatened litigation that could affect the value of the property. 3. There are no hidden or undisclosed conditions of the land or of the improvements that would render the property more or less valuable. Furthermore, there is no asbestos on the property. 4. The revenue stamps placed on any deed referenced herein to indicate the sale price are in correct relation to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5. The property complies with all applicable building, environmental, zoning, and other federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. 6. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable, but no warranty is given for its accuracy. This appraisal and any other work product related to this engagement are subject to the following limiting conditions, except as otherwise noted in the report: 1. An appraisal is inherently subjective and represents our opinion as to the value of the property appraised. 2. The conclusions stated in our appraisal apply only as of the effective date of the appraisal, and no representation is made as to the effect of subsequent events. 3. No changes in any federal, state, or local laws, regulations, or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated. 4. No environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction with this appraisal, and we reserve the right to revise or rescind any of the value opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies. If any environmental impact statement is required by law, the appraisal assumes that such a statement will be favorable and will be approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies. 5. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, we are not required to give testimony, respond to any subpoena, or attend any court, governmental or other hearing regarding the property without compensation relative to such additional employment. 6. We have not surveyed the property and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or survey of the property included in this report is for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered to be scaled accurately for size. The appraisal covers the G.7.p Packet Pg. 166 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 52 22747 Barton Road property as described in this report, and the areas and dimensions set forth are assumed to be correct. 7. No opinion is expressed as to the value of subsurface oil, gas, or mineral rights, if any, and we have assumed that the property is not subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials, unless otherwise noted in our appraisal. 8. We accept no responsibility for considerations requiring expertise in other fields. Such considerations include, but are not limited to, legal descriptions and other legal matters such as legal title, geologic considerations such as soils and seismic stability; and civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, and other engineering and environmental matters. Such considerations may also include determinations of compliance with zoning and other federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. 9. The distribution of the total valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. The appraisal report shall be considered only in its entirety. No part of the appraisal report shall be utilized separately or out of context. 10. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute) shall be disseminated through advertising media, public relations media, news media, or any other means of communication (including without limitation prospectuses, private offering memoranda and other offering material provided to prospective investors) without the prior written consent of the persons signing the report. 11. Information, estimates, and opinions contained in the report and obtained from third-party sources are assumed to be reliable and have not been independently verified. 12. Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only to estimate value and do not constitute predictions of future operating results. 13. If the property is subject to one or more leases, any estimate of residual value contained in the appraisal may be particularly affected by significant changes in the condition of the economy, of the real estate industry, or of the appraised property at the time these leases expire or otherwise terminate. 14. Unless otherwise stated in the report, no consideration has been given to personal property located on the premises or to the cost of moving or relocating such personal property; only the real property has been considered. 15. The current purchasing power of the dollar is the basis for the values stated in the appraisal; we have assumed that no extreme fluctuations in economic cycles will occur. 16. The values found herein are subject to these and any other assumptions or conditions set forth in the body of this report but which may have been omitted from this list of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions. 17. The analyses contained in the report necessarily incorporate numerous estimates and assumptions regarding property performance, general and local business and economic G.7.p Packet Pg. 167 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 53 22747 Barton Road conditions, the absence of material changes in the competitive environment, and other matters. Some estimates or assumptions, however, inevitably will not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur; therefore, actual results achieved during the period covered by our analysis will vary from our estimates, and the variations may be material. 18. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific survey or analysis of the property to determine whether the physical aspects of the improvements meet the ADA accessibility guidelines. We claim no expertise in ADA issues and render no opinion regarding the compliance of the subject with ADA regulations. Since compliance matches each owner’s financial ability with the cost to cure the non- conforming physical characteristics of a property, a specific study of both the owner’s financial ability and the cost to cure any deficiencies would be needed for the Department of Justice to determine compliance. 19. The appraisal report is prepared for the exclusive benefit of you, your subsidiaries, and/or affiliates. It may not be used or relied upon by any other party. All parties who use or rely upon any information in the report without our written consent do so at their own risk. 20. No studies have been provided to us indicating the presence or absence of hazardous materials on the subject property or in the improvements, and our valuation is predicated upon the assumption that the subject property is free and clear of any environmental hazards including, without limitation, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, and mold. No representations or warranties are made regarding the environmental condition of the subject property. IRR - Orange County, Integra Realty Resources, Inc., and their respective officers, owners, managers, directors, agents, subcontractors, or employees (the “Integra Parties”), shall not be responsible for any such environmental conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because we are not experts in the field of environmental conditions, the appraisal report cannot be considered as an environmental assessment of the subject property. 21. The persons signing the report may have reviewed available flood maps and may have noted in the appraisal report whether the subject property is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. However, we are not qualified to detect such areas and therefore do not guarantee such determinations. The presence of flood plain areas and/or wetlands may affect the value of the property, and the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that wetlands are non-existent or minimal. 22. We are not a building or environmental inspector. The Integra Parties do not guarantee that the subject property is free of defects or environmental problems. Mold may be present in the subject property and a professional inspection is recommended. 23. The appraisal report and value conclusions for an appraisal assume the satisfactory completion of construction, repairs, or alterations in a workmanlike manner. 24. IRR - Orange County is an independently owned and operated company. The parties hereto agree that Integra shall not be liable for any claim arising out of or relating to any appraisal report or any information or opinions contained therein as such appraisal report is the sole and exclusive responsibility of IRR - Orange County. In addition, it is expressly agreed that in G.7.p Packet Pg. 168 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 54 22747 Barton Road any action which may be brought against the Integra Parties arising out of, relating to, or in any way pertaining to the engagement letter, the appraisal reports, or any related work product, the Integra Parties shall not be responsible or liable for any incidental or consequential damages or losses, unless the appraisal was fraudulent or prepared with intentional misconduct. It is further expressly agreed that the collective liability of the Integra Parties in any such action shall not exceed the fees paid for the preparation of the assignment (unless the appraisal was fraudulent or prepared with intentional misconduct). It is expressly agreed that the fees charged herein are in reliance upon the foregoing limitations of liability. 25. IRR - Orange County is an independently owned and operated company, which has prepared the appraisal for the specific intended use stated elsewhere in the report. The use of the appraisal report by anyone other than the Client is prohibited except as otherwise provided. Accordingly, the appraisal report is addressed to and shall be solely for the Client’s use and benefit unless we provide our prior written consent. We expressly reserve the unrestricted right to withhold our consent to your disclosure of the appraisal report or any other work product related to the engagement (or any part thereof including, without limitation, conclusions of value and our identity), to any third parties. Stated again for clarification, unless our prior written consent is obtained, no third party may rely on the appraisal report (even if their reliance was foreseeable). 26. The conclusions of this report are estimates based on known current trends and reasonably foreseeable future occurrences. These estimates are based partly on property information, data obtained in public records, interviews, existing trends, buyer-seller decision criteria in the current market, and research conducted by third parties, and such data are not always completely reliable. The Integra Parties are not responsible for these and other future occurrences that could not have reasonably been foreseen on the effective date of this assignment. Furthermore, it is inevitable that some assumptions will not materialize and that unanticipated events may occur that will likely affect actual performance. While we believe that our findings are reasonable based on current market conditions, we do not represent that these estimates will be achieved, as they are subject to considerable risk and uncertainty. Moreover, we assume competent and effective management and marketing for the duration of the projected holding period of this property. 27. All prospective value opinions presented in this report are estimates and forecasts which are prospective and are subject to considerable risk and uncertainty. In addition to the contingencies noted in the preceding paragraph, several events may occur that could substantially alter the outcome of our estimates such as, but not limited to changes in the economy, interest rates, and capitalization rates, behavior of consumers, investors, and lenders, fire and other physical destruction, changes in title or conveyances of easements and deed restrictions, etc. It is assumed that conditions reasonably foreseeable at present are consistent or similar to the future. 28. The appraisal is also subject to the following: G.7.p Packet Pg. 169 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Valuation 55 22747 Barton Road Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 1. None 1. None The use of any extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition may have affected the assignment results. The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions. A hypothetical condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions. An extraordinary assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. G.7.p Packet Pg. 170 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Addendum A Appraiser Qualifications G.7.p Packet Pg. 171 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS Integra Realty Resources - Orange County irr.com T 949-591-8150 2151 Michelson Drive Suite 205 Irvine, CA 92612 Experience Mr. Donahue joins Integra Realty Resources – Orange County as Senior Managing Director. He has been appraising in Southern California since 1977, specializing in valuation and consulting services related to public agency and right-of-way clients and for major, investment grade commercial properties and special purposes properties. Mr. Donahue is experienced in valuing partial and full acquisitions related to eminent domain actions. These services include fee, easement and temporary easement valuations. Mr. Donahue has specialty experience in the appraisal of conservation easements, air right valuations, sub-surface easements, utility easements and transmission line easements. He also has expertise in valuing an extensive variety of investment grade real estate and special purpose properties for lending, investment consulting and other purposes. Mr. Donahue's services include a wide range of specialized studies including tax appeals, market demand, feasibility, investment analysis, assessment allocation, reuse analysis, and the valuation of partial interests including leasehold, leased fee and minority interests. He also acts as a review appraiser for multiple public agencies. Mr. Donahue has been a featured speaker at Appraisal Institute functions, a USPAP Instructor, and previously served on the organization’s national Board of Directors as Regional Chair, Member of the Executive Committee and Chair of the National Audit Committee. He is a recipient of the Bert L. Thornton Professional Service Award of the Southern California Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, awarded in recognition of many years of unselfish dedication to the Appraisal Institute and its Professional Goals and for the exemplary conduct displayed during their professional career. Professional Activities & Affiliations Appraisal Institute: Past Member of the National Board of Directors and Executive Committee Appraisal Institute: Past Chair of the Audit Committee Appraisal Institute: Past President of Southern California Chapter Appraisal Institute: Former Instructor - USPAP and AI Business Ethics courses Appraisal Institute: Southern California Chapter Instructor - The Valuation of Religious Properties Licenses California, Certified Real Estate Appraiser, AG008427, Expires April 2021 Education B.A., History, California Polytechnic University, Pomona Qualified Before Courts & Administrative Bodies U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern California District Orange County Superior Court San Bernardino County Assessors Appeal Court Orange County Assessors Appeals Court Various Arbitration Courts in Los Angeles and Orange counties rick.donahue@irr.com - 949-591-8147 G.7.p Packet Pg. 172 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Stephanie Kavanaugh Integra Realty Resources - Orange County irr.com T 949-591-8150 2151 Michelson Drive Suite 205 Irvine, CA 92612 Experience Ms. Kavanaugh has over fifteen years of commercial real estate valuation experience throughout California. Appraisal work completed includes residential, commercial, industrial, open space land, vacant land and other income producing properties for institutional and acquisition purposes, partial acquisition valuation, including determination of severance damages and/or benefits for public projects. Major projects appraised include freeway and street widening, gas pipeline, grade separations, transmission line easements and electrical substations. Special purpose properties appraised include landfills, museums, water tank sites, libraries, fire stations, and correctional institutions. Prior to beginning a career as a commercial real estate appraiser, Ms. Kavanaugh was a Nordstrom Buyer for the Northwest Region, and Manager of various departments. Responsibilities included scheduling, budgeting, sales goals and team building. Licenses California, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, AG030565, Expires April 2021 Education Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising, Los Angeles University of California, Los Angeles Other appraisal courses and seminars completed: Real Estate Appraisal 1 Introduction to Appraising Real Property Applied Residential Property Valuation Principles of Income Property Appraising Apartment Underwriting Seminar 2003 Property Inspection Seminar 2003 15-Hour USPAP Course Basic Income Capitalization General Demonstration and Report Writing Seminar Report Writing and Valuation Analysis Residential Site Valuation and Cost Approach Residential Sales and Income Approach Residential Report Writing and Case Studies Eminent Domain and Condemnation Business Practices and Ethics Analyzing Distressed Real Estate Analyzing Operating Expenses Property Acquisition Appraisal and Relocation in an Upside Down Market The Nuts and Bolts of Green Building Risky Business: Way to Minimize Your Liability Foundations in Sustainability Condemnation Appraising: Principles and Applications Advanced Income Capitalization Advanced Concepts and Case Studies skavanaugh@irr.com - 949-591-8149 G.7.p Packet Pg. 173 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) About IRR Integra Realty Resources, Inc. (IRR) provides world-class commercial real estate valuation, counseling, and advisory services. Routinely ranked among leading property valuation and consulting firms, we are now the largest independent firm in our industry in the United States, with local offices coast to coast and in the Caribbean. IRR offices are led by MAI-designated Senior Managing Directors, industry leaders who have over 25 years, on average, of commercial real estate experience in their local markets. This experience, coupled with our understanding of how national trends affect the local markets, empowers our clients with the unique knowledge, access, and historical perspective they need to make the most informed decisions. Many of the nation's top financial institutions, developers, corporations, law firms, and government agencies rely on our professional real estate opinions to best understand the value, use, and feasibility of real estate in their market. Local Expertise...Nationally! irr.com G.7.p Packet Pg. 174 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Addendum B IRR Quality Assurance Survey G.7.p Packet Pg. 175 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road IRR Quality Assurance Survey We welcome your feedback! At IRR, providing a quality work product and delivering on time is what we strive to accomplish. Our local offices are determined to meet your expectations. Please reach out to your local office contact so they can resolve any issues. Integra Quality Control Team Integra does have a Quality Control Team that responds to escalated concerns related to a specific assignment as well as general concerns that are unrelated to any specific assignment. We also enjoy hearing from you when we exceed expectations! The members of this team are listed below. You can communicate with this team by clicking on the link below. If you would like a follow up call, please provide your contact information and a member of this Quality Control Team will call contact you. Link to the IRR Quality Assurance Survey: quality.irr.com Integra Regional Quality Managers Region Regional Quality Manager Title Northeast Region Albert (Chip) Hughes, MAI, CRE Senior Managing Director Southeast Region Leslie North, MAI, AI-GRS Managing Director Central Region Gary Wright, MAI, SRA Senior Managing Director Southwest Region Rusty Rich, MAI, MRICS Senior Managing Director West Region Larry Close, MAI Senior Managing Director Corporate Rob McPherson, MAI, CCIM Director of Product Development and Quality G.7.p Packet Pg. 176 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Addendum C Definitions G.7.p Packet Pg. 177 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Definitions The source of the following definitions is the Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015), unless otherwise noted. As Is Market Value The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal date. Disposition Value The most probable price that a specified interest in property should bring under the following conditions: 1. Consummation of a sale within a specified time, which is shorter than the typical exposure time for such a property in that market. 2. The property is subjected to market conditions prevailing as of the date of valuation. 3. Both the buyer and seller are acting prudently and knowledgeably. 4. The seller is under compulsion to sell. 5. The buyer is typically motivated. 6. Both parties are acting in what they consider to be their best interests. 7. An adequate marketing effort will be made during the exposure time. 8. Payment will be made in cash in U.S. dollars (or the local currency) or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto. 9. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition can also be modified to provide for valuation with specified financing terms. Effective Date 1. The date on which the appraisal or review opinion applies. 2. In a lease document, the date upon which the lease goes into effect. Entitlement In the context of ownership, use, or development of real estate, governmental approval for annexation, zoning, utility extensions, number of lots, total floor area, construction permits, and occupancy or use permits. Entrepreneurial Incentive The amount an entrepreneur expects to receive for his or her contribution to a project. Entrepreneurial incentive may be distinguished from entrepreneurial profit (often called developer’s G.7.p Packet Pg. 178 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road profit) in that it is the expectation of future profit as opposed to the profit actually earned on a development or improvement. The amount of entrepreneurial incentive required for a project represents the economic reward sufficient to motivate an entrepreneur to accept the risk of the project and to invest the time and money necessary in seeing the project through to completion. Entrepreneurial Profit 1. A market-derived figure that represents the amount an entrepreneur receives for his or her contribution to a project and risk; the difference between the total cost of a property (cost of development) and its market value (property value after completion), which represents the entrepreneur’s compensation for the risk and expertise associated with development. An entrepreneur is motivated by the prospect of future value enhancement (i.e., the entrepreneurial incentive). An entrepreneur who successfully creates value through new development, expansion, renovation, or an innovative change of use is rewarded by entrepreneurial profit. Entrepreneurs may also fail and suffer losses. 2. In economics, the actual return on successful management practices, often identified with coordination, the fourth factor of production following land, labor, and capital; also called entrepreneurial return or entrepreneurial reward. Exposure Time 1. The time a property remains on the market. 2. The estimated length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective opinion based on an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market. Fee Simple Estate Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The relationship between the above-ground floor area of a building, as described by the zoning or building code, and the area of the plot on which it stands; in planning and zoning, often expressed as a decimal, e.g., a ratio of 2.0 indicates that the permissible floor area of a building is twice the total land area. Highest and Best Use 1. The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity. 2. The use of an asset that maximizes its potential and that is possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible. The highest and best use may be for continuation of an asset’s existing use or for some alternative use. This is determined by the use that a market participant would have in mind for the asset when formulating the price that it would be willing to bid. (ISV) G.7.p Packet Pg. 179 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road 3. [The] highest and most profitable use for which the property is adaptable and needed or likely to be needed in the reasonably near future. (Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions) Investment Value 1. The value of a property to a particular investor or class of investors based on the investor’s specific requirements. Investment value may be different from market value because it depends on a set of investment criteria that are not necessarily typical of the market. 2. The value of an asset to the owner or a prospective owner for individual investment or operational objectives. Lease A contract in which rights to use and occupy land, space, or structures are transferred by the owner to another for a specified period of time in return for a specified rent. Leased Fee Interest The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. Leasehold Interest The right held by the lessee to use and occupy real estate for a stated term and under the conditions specified in the lease. Liquidation Value The most probable price that a specified interest in real property should bring under the following conditions: 1. Consummation of a sale within a short time period. 2. The property is subjected to market conditions prevailing as of the date of valuation. 3. Both the buyer and seller are acting prudently and knowledgeably. 4. The seller is under extreme compulsion to sell. 5. The buyer is typically motivated. 6. Both parties are acting in what they consider to be their best interests. 7. A normal marketing effort is not possible due to the brief exposure time. 8. Payment will be made in cash in U.S. dollars (or the local currency) or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto. 9. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition can also be modified to provide for valuation with specified financing terms. G.7.p Packet Pg. 180 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Marketing Time An opinion of the amount of time it might take to sell a real or personal property interest at the concluded market value level during the period immediately after the effective date of an appraisal. Marketing time differs from exposure time, which is always presumed to precede the effective date of an appraisal. Market Value The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:  buyer and seller are typically motivated;  both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests;  a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;  payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and  the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. (Source: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 12, Chapter I, Part 34.42[h]; also Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, Federal Register, 75 FR 77449, December 10, 2010, page 77472) Prospective Opinion of Value A value opinion effective as of a specified future date. The term does not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific future date. An opinion of value as of a prospective date is frequently sought in connection with projects that are proposed, under construction, or under conversion to a new use, or those that have not yet achieved sellout or a stabilized level of long-term occupancy. G.7.p Packet Pg. 181 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Addendum D Property Information G.7.p Packet Pg. 182 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.p Packet Pg. 183 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.p Packet Pg. 184 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.p Packet Pg. 185 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Addenda 22747 Barton Road Addendum E Comparable Data G.7.p Packet Pg. 186 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 1 Location & Property Identification 233 S La Cadena Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Commercial 233 S. La Cadena Address: Colton, CA 92324 City/State/Zip: San Bernardino County: Suburban Market Orientation: SWC of La Cadena & L Street Property Location: IRR Event ID: 2528870 Sale Information $125,000 Sale Price: $125,000 Effective Sale Price: 09/25/2020 Sale Date: Recording Date: 10/13/2020 Listing Price: $155,000 Listing Date: 04/28/2020 Sale Status: Closed $/Acre(Gross): $362,950 $/Land SF(Gross): $8.33 $/Acre(Usable): $362,950 $/Land SF(Usable): $8.33 Grantor/Seller: Symira Corporation (50%) & Vahab Aghai (50%) Grantee/Buyer: Alberto De Leon Assets Sold: Real estate only Property Rights: Fee Simple % of Interest Conveyed: 100.00 Financing: Cash to seller Document Type: Deed Recording No.: 20-392444 Verified By: J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS Verification Date: 11/18/2020 Confirmation Source: Jeremie Tavisola Verification Type: Confirmed-Seller Broker Secondary Verific. Source: CoStar, Deed Sale Analysis Current Use at T.O.S.: Vacant Land Proposed Use Desc.: N.A. Improvement and Site Data MSA: San Bernardino/Riverside MSA COLTON CITY LOTS 1 2 3 AND 4 BLK 170 Parcel Number(s): 0163-074-31, 0163-074-31 Legal/Tax/Parcel ID: 0.34/0.34 Acres(Usable/Gross): 15,002/15,002 Land-SF(Usable/Gross): Usable/Gross Ratio: 1.00 Frontage Feet: 150 Frontage Desc.: 150' on La Cadena, 100' on L Street Frontage Type: 2 way, 2 lanes each way Traffic Control at Entry: None Traffic Flow: Moderate AccessibilityRating: Average Visibility Rating: Average Zoning Code: C-2 Zoning Desc.: Commercial Utilities Desc.: All utilities are available at the street Source of Land Info.: Other 233 S La Cadena G.7.p Packet Pg. 187 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 1 Comments This is a corner site located at the SWC of La Cadena & L Street. La Cadena is a secondary commercial artery, with residential uses on either side. The location is a short distance south of the access to Interstate 10. The site was on the market for five months with an original asking price of $155,000. There are two curb cuts on La Cadena and one on L Street. Buyer's intent is not known, but the location would suggest a future service-related business. This is a corner property located south of I-10 in a secondary service-commercial location. The non-frontage surrounding neighborhood is residential. Traffic is medium capacity and the site in close to access to and from Interstate 10. 233 S La Cadena G.7.p Packet Pg. 188 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 2 Location & Property Identification 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Commercial 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave Address: Colton, CA 92324 City/State/Zip: San Bernardino County: Suburban Market Orientation: IRR Event ID: 2528871 Sale Information $183,000 Sale Price: $183,000 Effective Sale Price: 08/14/2020 Sale Date: Recording Date: 08/24/2020 Listing Price: $199,000 Listing Date: 09/10/2019 Sale Status: Closed $/Acre(Gross): $462,121 $/Land SF(Gross): $10.61 $/Acre(Usable): $462,121 $/Land SF(Usable): $10.61 Grantor/Seller: Lina Yoo Grantee/Buyer: Marlon K. Tan Assemblage: No Portfolio Sale: No Assets Sold: Real estate only Property Rights: Fee Simple % of Interest Conveyed: 100.00 Exposure Time: 11 (months) Financing: Cash to seller Document Type: Deed Recording No.: 20-301767 Verified By: J. Richard Donahue, MAI, FRICS Verification Date: 11/18/2020 Confirmation Source: Jeremie Tavasola Verification Type: Confirmed-Seller Broker Secondary Verific. Source: CoStar, Deed Sale Analysis Current Use at T.O.S.: Vacant Land Proposed Use Desc.: N.A. Improvement and Site Data Parcel Number(s): 0164-021-32, 0164-021-33 Legal/Tax/Parcel ID: 0.40/0.40 Acres(Usable/Gross): 17,249/17,249 Land-SF(Usable/Gross): Usable/Gross Ratio: 1.00 Zoning Desc.: Commercial Source of Land Info.: Other Comments This sale includes two parcels, 0164-021-32 & 33. The site is at the SEC of Mt. Vernon Avenue & Hillcrest Avenue. A flood control channel extends on the north side of Hillcrest Avenue. Mt. Vernon has good traffic levels in this location and there is a mixture of small commercial businesses, retail and fast food restaurants nearby. There is a billboard on site, terms could not be verified. 1362 N Mount Vernon Ave G.7.p Packet Pg. 189 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 3 Location & Property Identification 0.76-Acre Commercial Land Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Commercial 439 W. Base Line St Address: San Bernardino, CA 92410 City/State/Zip: San Bernardino County: Suburban Market Orientation: IRR Event ID: 2454891 Sale Information $220,000 Sale Price: $220,000 Effective Sale Price: 04/29/2020 Sale Date: Listing Price: $295,000 Sale Status: Closed $/Acre(Gross): $290,391 $/Land SF(Gross): $6.67 $/Acre(Usable): $290,391 $/Land SF(Usable): $6.67 Grantor/Seller: 439 W Baseline LLC Grantee/Buyer: Cipa Investment Inc. Property Rights: Fee Simple Exposure Time: 13 (months) Document Type: Deed Recording No.: 147557 Verified By: Cathy Williams Verification Date: 05/14/2020 Confirmation Source: Other Verification Type: Confirmed-Other Secondary Verific. Source: CoStar, Data Service, Deed Sale Analysis Current Use at T.O.S.: Vacant Land Occupancy Occupancy at Time of Sale: 0.00% Improvement and Site Data MSA: Inland Empire (California) 0140-052-19 Legal/Tax/Parcel ID: 0.76/0.76 Acres(Usable/Gross): 33,001/33,001 Land-SF(Usable/Gross): Usable/Gross Ratio: 1.00 Shape: Rectangular Topography: Level Frontage Feet: 132 Frontage Desc.: On Base Line Street; 250' on Stoddard Frontage Type: 2 way, 2 lanes each way Traffic Control at Entry: Turn lane Traffic Flow: High Traffic Count: 28,704 AccessibilityRating: Average Visibility Rating: Above average Zoning Code: CG-1 Zoning Desc.: CG-1 Utilities Desc.: All to site Source of Land Info.: Other Comments Vacant previously developed commercial lot located at a corner. The site is adjacent to a small neighborhood market as well as other neighborhood commercial services. The property was on the market for approximately 13 months. 0.76-Acre Commercial Land G.7.p Packet Pg. 190 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 4 Location & Property Identification La Crosse Ave s/o Barton Rd Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Commercial La Crosse Ave s/o Barton Rd Address: Grand Terrace, CA 92313 City/State/Zip: San Bernardino County: Suburban Market Orientation: IRR Event ID: 2325951 Sale Information $450,000 Sale Price: $450,000 Effective Sale Price: 12/10/2019 Sale Date: Listing Price: $595,000 Sale Status: Closed $/Acre(Gross): $505,623 $/Land SF(Gross): $11.61 Grantor/Seller: Dennis M. Sandoval Trustee Grantee/Buyer: Diba Real Estate Investments LLC Property Rights: Fee Simple Exposure Time: 4 (months) Financing: All cash Document Type: Deed Recording No.: 2019-0455564 Verified By: Thomas G. Richardson, MAI Verification Date: 03/05/2020 Verification Type: Confirmed-Seller Broker Secondary Verific. Source: CoStar Sale Analysis Proposed Use Desc.: Commercial Entitlement @ T.O.S.: No Improvement and Site Data MSA: Inland Empire (California) 1167-121-10 Legal/Tax/Parcel ID: 0.89 Acres(Gross): 38,768/38,768 Land-SF(Usable/Gross): Zoning Desc.: C2, General Commercial Source of Land Info.: Other Comments The property is located along the west side of La Crosse Avenue, just south of Barton Road. Surrounding land uses are primarily industrial and limited commercial. Vic Onorio, the broker who represented both the buyer and seller, confirmed that the transaction was arm's-length and that no conditions affected the sale price. Mr. Onorio indicated that the buyer purchased the property with the intention of eventually developing it with a commercial use, but they were in no rush to do so. The site was not entitled at the time of sale. La Crosse Ave & Barton Rd G.7.p Packet Pg. 191 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Land Sale Profile Sale No. 5 Location & Property Identification Barton Rd Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Commercial Barton Rd, w/o Vivienda Ave Address: Grand Terrace, CA 92313 City/State/Zip: San Bernardino County: Suburban Market Orientation: IRR Event ID: 2312165 Sale Information $400,000 Sale Price: $400,000 Effective Sale Price: 03/20/2019 Sale Date: Sale Status: Closed $/Acre(Gross): $500,000 $/Land SF(Gross): $11.48 $/Land SF(Usable): $21.01 Grantor/Seller: Community Redevelopment Agency C/O Grand Terrace Grantee/Buyer: Golden Star Investment Properties LLC Property Rights: Fee Simple Exposure Time: 8 (months) Financing: Cash to seller Document Type: Deed Recording No.: 85266 Verified By: Jessica Steigner Verification Date: 01/15/2020 Verification Type: Secondary Verification Secondary Verific. Source: CoStar Sale Analysis Proposed Use Desc.: Commercial Improvement and Site Data MSA: Inland Empire (California) 0275-242-11 Legal/Tax/Parcel ID: 0.80 Acres(Gross): 19,036/34,848 Land-SF(Usable/Gross): Frontage Desc.: 180 feet on Barton Rd Zoning Desc.: GC Source of Land Info.: Public Records Comments Purchase of a vacant commercial lot located midblock on Barton Road, west of Vivienda Avenue. The buyer’s plans are unknown. Barton Rd G.7.p Packet Pg. 192 At t a c h m e n t : I n t e g r a A p p r a i s a l - 2 2 7 4 7 B a r t o n R d ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.q Packet Pg. 193 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 1 7 - 0 1 S A R e s o l u t i o n - S E R A F L o a n R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.q Packet Pg. 194 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 1 7 - 0 1 S A R e s o l u t i o n - S E R A F L o a n R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.q Packet Pg. 195 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 1 7 - 0 1 S A R e s o l u t i o n - S E R A F L o a n R e p a y m e n t S c h e d u l e ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) Colton Unified 26.5% Grand Terrace General Fund 20.0% Education Revenue Augmentation Fund 19.3% County General Fund 12.7% County Fire Protection District - Valley Service 10.3% San Bernardino Community College 4.5% San Bernardino Valley Muni. Water 2.3% Flood Control Zone 2 2.3% County Free Library 1.2% Superintendent of Schools - Countywide 0.4% Others 0.5% Total:100.0% THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 2020/21 WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ATI Revenue by Agency for all TRAs within Selected Agency (Revenue Calculated as if RDAs no Longer Existed) Agency Description Net Value in Agency Revenue Weighted Avg ShareAgency Colton Unified 1,206,854,888 3,201,901.56 26.530957%SU20-GA01 Grand Terrace General Fund 1,206,854,888 2,410,239.48 19.971245%CC14-GA01 Education Revenue Augmentation Fund 1,206,854,888 2,323,899.34 19.255831%AB02-GA01 County General Fund 1,206,854,888 1,534,699.94 12.716524%AB01-GA01 County Fire Protection District - Valley Service 1,206,854,888 1,247,384.90 10.335832%UF01-GA01 San Bernardino Community College 1,206,854,888 539,377.84 4.469285%SC54-GA01 San Bernardino Valley Muni. Water 1,206,854,888 277,562.77 2.299885%WU23-GA01 Flood Control Zone 2 1,206,854,888 272,445.31 2.257482%BF02-GA01 County Free Library 1,206,854,888 148,612.11 1.231400%BL01-GA01 Superintendent of Schools - Countywide 1,206,854,888 52,660.35 0.436344%BS01-GA01 Superintendent of Schools - Physically Handicapped 1,206,854,888 20,714.31 0.171639%BS01-GA03 Flood Control Admin. 1 & 2 1,206,854,888 19,157.49 0.158739%BF07-GA01 Riverside Corona RCD 1,206,854,888 14,463.56 0.119845%WR01-GL01 Superintendent of Schools - Development Center 1,206,854,888 5,429.93 0.044992%BS01-GA05 $12,068,548.88 100.000000%Total Basic Revenue Generated: NOTES: The share calculations do not take into account any override revenue. In counties where ERAF is not included in the TRA factors it may not be represented in the listing above. In those counties, the shares for non-school taxing entities will likely be adjusted by the Auditor-Controller and will be lower than shown. This report is not to be used in support of debt issuance or continuing disclosure statements without the written consent of HdL, Coren & Cone Prepared On 3/10/2021 By DS Data Source: 2020/21 Combined Tax Rolls Page 1 G.7.r Packet Pg. 196 At t a c h m e n t : G R A N D T E R R A C E - A v g B a s i c R a t e s ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.s Packet Pg. 197 At t a c h m e n t : G e n e r a l F u n d P r o p e r t y T a x C o m p a r i s o n s ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) G.7.t Packet Pg. 198 At t a c h m e n t : S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y T a b u l a t i o n o f R P T T F A l l o c a t i o n s ( S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y D i s s o l u t i o n ) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 11, 2021 Council Item TITLE: FY 2021-22 Budget Development Guidelines and Budget Schedule PRESENTED BY: G. Harold Duffey, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the FY2021-22 Budget Development Guidelines and Proposed Budget Review Schedule 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports City Council Goal #1, “Ensure Our Fiscal Viability,” through the continuous monitoring of revenue receipts and expenditure disbursements against approved budget appropriations. BACKGROUND and DISCUSSION: To ensure City Council agrees with the process for developing the FY2021-22 budget, and the schedule leading up to budget adoption, the following budget development guidelines and review schedule are proposed for City Council’s approval. Budget Development Guidelines The following guidelines are submitted for the City Council’s review and approval. If approved, they will be utilized in the development of the FY 2021-22 Budget: • City staff will be submitting a one-year budget for FY2021-22 instead of a two- year budget as was done in the prior two years (except for last year because of Covid-19). • The Department of Finance will only present a proposed budget that results in a Sustainable General Fund (Revenue exceeds Expenses and General Fund reserve is 17% or greater) (Attachment I). • New Department personnel requests or increase in services will be reviewed and supported by the Finance Department, when requests are supported by increased General Fund revenue or utilization of other revenue sources (Grants, Development Impact Fees (DIF), Special Funds (Housing Successor Agency, Spring Mountain Ranch) and new Deposits and Fees. • Departments will submit budgets to fully execute their core services in the most efficient and effective manner. Department staffing recommendations will reflect changes to pre-pandemic levels because of increased service demands, development projects and internal support services. G.8 Packet Pg. 199 • A general inflation factor will only be applied to contractual services or maintenance & operations line items for multi-year contracts that provide for inflationary adjustments. • All contracts will be reviewed to either reduce or eliminate said services if possible; Departments should make every effort to reduce General Fund expenditures or keep them at their lowest levels. • Any New Budget Request items that are supported by the City Manager will be separately identified in the Proposed Budget, rather than being incorporated in the base budget. This approach will enable City Council to individually review and approve/disapprove each item that is being proposed. • Capital Assets (assets with an initial cost of $5,000 or greater and an estimated useful life of at least two years) that are proposed for replacement must be separately identified through a Capital Asset Replacement Request form. Any such requested replacements will be separately identified in the Proposed Budget, rather than being incorporated in the base budget. This approach will enable the City Council to individually review and approve/disapprove each item that is being proposed. • When considering a potential Capital Asset replacement, departments should make every effort to extend the useful life and keep the asset in service longer if it may be safely operated and is cost-effective to do so considering expected maintenance and repair costs. • Any proposed service level or staffing reductions will be separately identified, along with the corresponding cost savings and service level impact, in the Proposed Budget, rather than being incorporated in the base budget. This approach will enable the City Council to individually review and approve/ disapprove each item that is being considered. • Following budget deliberations on the Proposed Budget, including potential additions and/or reductions to the base budget, the budget will be adopted by the City Council prior to the start of the new fiscal year (July 1, 2021). • On January 28, 2020, the City Council voted to incorporate California Government Code Section 36516 into its budget guidelines. Section 36516 establishes mechanism for City Council to adjust salary of future City Councils (adjustments can only be received by Council members after the next election). Staff will prepare resolution and provide Council with options and fiscal impact (Attachment II). Year-end Projections for FY20-21 and Revenue Projections for FY2021-22 G.8 Packet Pg. 200 On March 9, 2021, the City Council received an update on year-end budget projections for FY2020-21. The table below couples the FY2021 year-end projection with two Revenue and Expense forecast for FY2021-22. Projection #1 assumes the Dissolution of the Successor Agency, and Projection #2 does not. $2,172,593 $2,505,739 $2,172,593 $1,348,163 $0 $1,348,163 VLF $1,485,423 $0 $595,000 $606,900 $606,900 $344,090 $350,972 $350,972 $850,000 $867,000 $867,000 $35,000 $35,700 $35,700 $100,300 $102,306 $102,306 $70,000 $71,400 $71,400 $0 $0 $0 $67,500 $68,850 $68,850 $0 $0 $0 $318,349 $318,349 $318,349 $5,900,995 $6,412,639 $5,942,233 $1,178,626 $1,178,626 $1,178,626 $1,023,709 $1,023,709 $1,023,709 $3,387,646 $3,218,700 $3,387,646 $211,351 $215,578 $215,578 $13,323 $13,589 $13,589 $133,858 $136,535 $136,535 ($87,450)($87,450)($87,450) $135,800 $135,800 $135,800 $5,996,863 $5,835,088 $5,868,234 $5,900,995 $6,412,639 $5,942,233 $5,996,863 $5,835,088 $5,868,234 ($95,868)$577,551 $73,999 ($95,868) REVENUE & EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET Use of Fund Balance Materials & Supplies Lease of Facility/Equipment Utilities Overhead Cost Allocation Transfers Out TOTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Salaries Benefits Professional/Cont. Services Charges for Services Fines & Forfeitures Miscellaneous Use of Money & Property Transfers In Wastewater Receipts Property Tax Residual Receipts - RPTTF Franchise Fees Licenses, Fees & Permits Sales Tax Intergovernmental Revenue/Grants Year End Projection 3/9/2021 Projection 1 FY 2021-22 Projection 2 FY 2021-22 REVENUES The City's FY2021-22 Proposed Budget will mirror the FY2020-21 budget. The budget will include Department supplemental requests for additional staff and resources. The G.8 Packet Pg. 201 requests will be consistent with approved Budget Development Guidelines and revenue projections identified in Projection #1 for FY2021-22. Tentative Budget Review Schedule Following is the tentative schedule for City Council review, deliberation, and adoption of the FY2021-22 Budget: Table 1 FY2021-22 Proposed Budget Review Schedule Date Budget in the Park Presentations at Richard Rollins and Veterans Freedom Park (Community Outreach) May 19, & May 27, 2021 Virtual 2021-22 Budget Workshop (Community Outreach) Wed - May 26, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Presentation of Proposed Budget to City Council Tue – June 8, 2021 (Special Meeting) CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Budget Deliberations Start; Approval of the City’s FY2021-22 Appropriations Limits Tue - June 15, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Budget Deliberations continue and Budget Adoption Tue - June 22, 2021 ATTACHMENTS: • Attachment I - General Fund's Long Term Financial Performance(PDF) • Attachment II - CA Govt Code Section 36516 (PDF) APPROVALS: G. Harold Duffey Completed 05/06/2021 1:41 PM Finance Completed 05/06/2021 1:58 PM City Attorney Completed 05/06/2021 3:00 PM City Manager Completed 05/06/2021 8:21 PM City Council Pending 05/11/2021 6:00 PM G.8 Packet Pg. 202 G.8.a Packet Pg. 203 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I - G e n e r a l F u n d ' s L o n g T e r m F i n a n c i a l P e r f o r m a n c e ( F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 B u d g e t G.8.a Packet Pg. 204 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I - G e n e r a l F u n d ' s L o n g T e r m F i n a n c i a l P e r f o r m a n c e ( F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 B u d g e t CA Govt Code§ 36516 (2017) (a) (1) A city council may enact an ordinance providing that each member of the city council shall receive a salary based on the population of the city as set forth in paragraph (2). (2) The salaries approved by ordinance under paragraph (1) shall be as follows: (A) In cities up to and including 35,000 in population, up to and including three hundred dollars ($300) per month. (8) In cities over 35,000 up to and including 50,000 in population, up to and including four hundred dollars ($400) per month. (C) In cities over 50,000 up to and including 75,000 in population, up to and including five hundred dollars ($500) per month. (0) In cities over 75,000 up to and including 150,000 in population, up to and including six hundred dollars ($600) per month. (E) In cities over 150,000 up to and including 250,000 in population, up to and including eight hundred dollars ($800) per month. (F) In cities over 250,000 population, up to and including one thousand dollars ($1,000) per month. (3) For the purposes of this subdivision, the population of a city shall be determined by the last preceding federal census, or a subsequent census, or estimate validated by the Department of Finance. (4) The salary of council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in this subdivision by an ordinance or by an amendment to an ordinance, but the amount of the increase shall not exceed an amount equal to 5 percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in effect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted. No ordinance shall be enacted or amended to provide automatic future increases in salary. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), at any municipal election, the question of whether city council members shall receive a salary for services, and the amount of that salary, may be submitted to the electors. If a majority of the electors voting at the election favor it, all of the council members shall receive the salary specified in the election call. The salary of council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in this section or decreased below the amount in the same manner. (c) Unless specifically authorized by another statute, a city council may not enact an ordinance providing for compensation to city council members in excess of that authorized by the procedures described in subdivisions (a) and (b ). For the purposes of this section, compensation includes payment for service by a city council member on a commission, committee, board, authority, or similar body on which the city council member serves. If the other statute that authorizes the compensation does not specify G.8.b Packet Pg. 205 At t a c h m e n t : A t t a c h m e n t I I - C A G o v t C o d e S e c t i o n 3 6 5 1 6 ( F Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 2 B u d g e t D e v e l o p m e n t G u i d e l i n e s a n d B u d g e t S c h e d u l e )