12-02-2021
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
AGENDA
Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM
PUBLIC ADVISORY: THE COUNCIL CHAMBER IS NOW OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!!
Beginning June 15, 2020, the City of Grand Terrace reopenedits public meetings. Therefore, the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Boardfor December 02, 2021,is now
open to the public. Please be advised that face masks are required, social distancing will be practiced,
and occupancy limits will be enforced.
Please note that Pursuant to Section 3 of Executive Order N-29-20, issued by Governor Newsom on
March 17, 2020, the regular meeting of the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Boardfor
December 02, 2021,
website.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
The public is encouraged to address the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Boardon any
matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the
Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board, please complete a Request to Speak Card and
hand it to the Planning Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair at the appropriate time and
each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time.
If you would like to participate telephonically and speak on an agenda item, you can access the meeting
by dialing the following telephone number and you will be placed in the waiting room, muted until it is your
turn to speak:
1-669-900-9128
Enter Meeting ID: 84208557534
Password: 671393
The City wants you to know that you can also submit your comments by email to
ccpubliccomment@grandterrace-ca.gov. To give the Planning Secretary adequate time to print out your
comments for consideration at the meeting, please submit your written comments prior to 5:00 p.m.; or if
you are unable to email, please call the at (909) 824-6621 x212by 5:00 p.m.
If you wish to have your comments read to the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board
during the appropriate Public Comment period
Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Boardwill be subject to the three (3) minute time
limitation (approximately 350 words).
Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the
agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The Planning Commission/Site &
Architectural Review Boardmay direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for
consideration at a future Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Boardmeeting.
PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this
agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 1 st Floor Lobby Area and 2 nd Floor
www.grandterrace-ca.gov. For
further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the Planning Secretaryat (909)
824-6621 x212, or via e-mail at mduenas@grandterrace-ca.gov.
City of Grand TerracePage 1
Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board December 2, 2021
Any documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission/Site & Architectural Review Board
City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be
at www.grandterrace-ca.gov.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Cler-6621 x230 at least 48 hours prior to the
advertised starting time of the meeting. This will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to this meeting. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible.
CALL TO ORDER
Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review
Board.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
Chairman Edward A. Giroux
Vice-Chairman Jeremy Briggs
Commissioner Tara Cesena
Commissioner Jeffrey McConnell
Commissioner David Alaniz
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS
None.
PUBLIC ADDRESS
Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by
the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written
request to be agendized to the Director of Planning and Development Services.
City of Grand Terrace Page 2
Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board December 2, 2021
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not
appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,
the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but
may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The
Chairman may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public
comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting.
A.CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 09/16/2021
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 10/21/2021
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
B.ACTION ITEMS
None.
C.PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Conditional Use Permit 20-03, Variance 21-01, Site and Architectural Review 20-09,
and Environmental 20-09; a Proposal to Establish a 200-Megawatt Battery Energy
Storage System (BESS) Facility, Generally Located Near the Corner of Main Street and
Taylor Street (APN: 1167-151-77-0000)
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2) Consider Adoption of A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE
AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL 20-09) PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING
VARIANCE 21-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 20-03, AND SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 20-09 TO DEVELOP A 200-MEGAWATT
BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (BESS) FACILITY ON AN
APPROXIMATE 10-
1167-151-77-0000) WHICH IS PRIMARILY UNDEVELOPED AND
GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE CORNER OF MAIN STREET AND
City of Grand Terrace Page 3
Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board December 2, 2021
TAYLOR STREET, ABOUT 0.35 MILES FROM INTERSTATE 215 AND SOUTH
CITY BORDERLINE WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
D.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS
E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS
ADJOURN
Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review
Board/Planning Commission to be held on December 16, 2021, at 6:30 p.m.
City of Grand Terrace Page 4
A.1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES
Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Edward Giroux convened the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
and Site and Architectural Review Board for Thursday, September 16, 2021, at 6:30
p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Giroux.
Attendee NameTitleStatusArrived
Edward A. GirouxChairmanPresent
Jeremy BriggsVice-ChairmanAbsent
Tara CesenaCommissionerAbsent
Jeffrey McConnellCommissionerPresent
David AlanizCommissionerPresent
Steven WeissPlanning & Development Services DirectorPresent
Robert KhuuAssistant City AttorneyPresent
Haide AguirreAssociate PlannerPresent
Debra ThomasCity ClerkPresent
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1.Motion: September 16, 2021, Approval of Agenda
RESULT:ADOPTED \[UNANIMOUS\]
MOVER:Jeffrey McConnell, Commissioner
SECONDER:David Alaniz, Commissioner
AYES:Edward A. Giroux, Jeffrey McConnell, David Alaniz
ABSENT:Jeremy Briggs, Tara Cesena
PUBLIC ADDRESS
None.
City of Grand TerracePage 1
Packet Pg. 5
A.1
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 16, 2021
A.CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 06/17/2021
RESULT: ACCEPTED \[UNANIMOUS\]
MOVER: David Alaniz, Commissioner
SECONDER: Jeffrey McConnell, Commissioner
AYES: Edward A. Giroux, Jeffrey McConnell, David Alaniz
ABSENT: Jeremy Briggs, Tara Cesena
B.ACTION ITEMS
None.
C.PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
PRESENTATIONS
1. Update to Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Steve Weiss, Planning & Development Services Director gave the PowerPoint
presentation for this item.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Darryl Moore, Grand Terrace expressed his concern with the new law and believes it is
a bad law that will provoke a lot of lawsuits.
RECEIVE AND FILE - UPDATE VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC
IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
RESULT: NO ACTION TAKEN
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Sep 16, 2021 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
D.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS
Steve Weiss, Planning & Development Services Director stated that staff has been
working diligently on the Specific Plan Update, the Housing Element and the draft EIR
process for the Lewis Gateway Project to bring back to the Planning Commission on an
informational level in the next couple of months.
City of Grand Terrace Page 2
Packet Pg. 6
A.1
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 16, 2021
E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Jeffrey McConnell went to the Colton Planning Commission meeting on
September 14, 2021, regarding the proposed Barton Road Logistics Center. Several
Grand Terrace residents attended and expressed their concerns with the project.
Commissioner McConnell identified some of the project concerns as follows:
Proposal to cut off Terrace Avenue South with no plans to replace it
foot walls along Walnut Avenue and the back along Grand Terrace Avenue
The project is proposing an $8.5 million contribution to build a new bridge and
straighten out Barton Road up to Palm however the concern is when this would
happen
The Planning Commission did express its concern that the 1936 bridge would not
hold three (3) large truck trailers without possibly failing.
Area residents suggested that a U-shape or L-shape building be designed that
would contain all traffic noise within the project.
Local business owners along La Crosse and De Berry expressed their concerns
that they did not receive notification regarding the proposition regarding Terrace
Avenue and want it replaced.
Commissioner McConnell stated the meeting was continued to October 26, 2021.
Commissioner David Alaniz wants to make sure that staff is aware of SB 1383 to be
implemented in January 2022. The nature of the bill is to reduce the number of organics
into the landfill. He described some of the particulars of the bill and wanted to make
sure the City is taking steps to comply.
Chairman Giroux asked if the commissioners will be able to attend the Planning
Commissioner Academy in March 2022. Director Weiss will review and get back to the
Planning Commission.
Equitable Housing. He stated Equitable Housing is not the same as Equal Housing for
all. Equitable Housing is for some and not all.
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Sep 16, 2021 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
City of Grand Terrace Page 3
Packet Pg. 7
A.1
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 16, 2021
ADJOURN
Chairman Giroux adjourned the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission/Site and
Architectural Review Board at 7:30 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board to be held on October 7, 2021, at 6:30
p.m.
_________________________________ _________________________________
Edward Giroux, Chairman of the Grand Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk
Terrace Planning Commission
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Sep 16, 2021 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
City of Grand Terrace Page 4
Packet Pg. 8
A.2
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES
Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM
Gran
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Edward Giroux was participating in the meeting via Zoom, therefore
requested that Vice-Chair Jeremy Briggs run the meeting.
Vice-Chair Briggs convened the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission/Site and
Architectural Review Board for Thursday, October 21, 2021,at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Planning Commissioner Jeffrey McConnell.
Attendee NameTitleStatusArrived
Edward A. GirouxChairmanRemote
Jeremy BriggsVice-ChairmanPresent
Tara CeseñaCommissionerRemote
Jeffrey McConnellCommissionerPresent
David AlanizCommissionerPresent
Steven WeissPlanning & Development Services DirectorPresent
Robert KhuuAssistant City AttorneyPresent
Haide AguirreAssociate PlannerPresent
Debra ThomasCity ClerkPresent
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1.Motion:October 21, 2021
RESULT:ADOPTED \[UNANIMOUS\]
MOVER:Edward A. Giroux, Chairman
SECONDER:David Alaniz, Commissioner
AYES:Giroux, Briggs, Ceseña, McConnell, Alaniz
PRESENTATIONS
None.
City of Grand TerracePage 1
Packet Pg. 9
A.2
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board October 21, 2021
PUBLIC ADDRESS
None.
A.CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 09/16/2021
Vice-Chair Briggs moved, with a second from Commissioner McConnell to continue
Approval of Minutes to the next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission/Site
and Architectural Review Board.
RESULT: APPROVED \[UNANIMOUS\]
MOVER: Jeremy Briggs, Vice-Chair
SECONDER: Jeffrey McConnell, Commissioner
AYES: Giroux, Briggs, Ceseña, McConnell, Alaniz
B.ACTION ITEMS
1. 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element
John Douglas, JHD Consulting gave the PowerPoint presentation for this item.
Adam Collier, Vice-President of the Lewis Group of Companies, expressed their
concerns regarding the implications of the draft Housing Element but also wanted to
extend his appreciation to Steve Weiss, Planning & Development Services Director,
John Douglas, JHD Consulting and the team for allowing Lewis Group to express their
concerns.
1. RECEIVE STAFF PRESENTATION
2. RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS
3. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO STAFF AS APPROPRIATE
RESULT: NO ACTION TAKEN
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 21, 2021 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
C.PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
City of Grand Terrace Page 2
Packet Pg. 10
A.2
Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board October 21, 2021
D.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS
Steve Weiss, Planning & Development Services Director informed the Planning
Commission that a project called Condor Battery Energy Storage will be brought back to
the Planning Commission approximately December of 2021. On November 2, 2021, at
6:00 p.m., a Public Outreach Workshop for the public will be held in the City Council
Chamber.
E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner McConnell asked for a status on the plastics recycling project on Barton
Road along the UP railroad.
Director Weiss stated the project is in process.
Commissioner McConnell posed a question at the last meeting to the City Attorney
regarding the term, equitable housing, and its use.
Robert Khuu, Assistant City Attorney stated that the term equitable housing is not used
in the Housing Element and staff can clarify that the term should not be used in relation
to affordable housing in the future.
ADJOURN
Vice-Chair Briggs adjourned the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission/Site and
Architectural Review Board at 7:30 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board to be held on November 4, 2021, at
6:30 p.m.
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 21, 2021 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
City of Grand Terrace Page 3
Packet Pg. 11
C.1
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:December 2, 2021
TITLE:Conditional Use Permit 20-03, Variance 21-01, Site and
Architectural Review 20-09, and Environmental 20-09; a
Proposal to Establish a 200-Megawatt Battery Energy
Storage System (BESS) Facility, Generally Located Near the
Corner of Main Street and Taylor Street (APN: 1167-151-77-
0000)
PRESENTED BY:Haide Aguirre, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:Conduct a public hearing; and
2)Consider Adoption of A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION(ENVIRONMENTAL 20-09) PURSUANT
TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA) AND APPROVING VARIANCE 21-01,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 20-03,ANDSITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 20-09 TO DEVELOP A 200-
MEGAWATT BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
(BESS) FACILITY ON AN APPROXIMATE 10-ACRE SITE
-151-77-
0000) WHICH IS PRIMARILY UNDEVELOPEDAND
GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE CORNER OF MAIN
STREET AND TAYLOR STREET, ABOUT 0.35 MILES
FROM INTERSTATE 215 AND SOUTH CITY
BORDERLINE WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY
2030 VISION STATEMENT:
This item supports Goal 3 to Promote Economic Development by establishing a use that
is consistent with the Industrial Zoning District designationand supportof reliable
sustainableenergy goals.
PROPOSAL:
has filed a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 20-03), Variance (V 21-01), andSite and
Architectural Review (SA 20-09), proposing to establish a 200-Megawatt Battery Energy
-acre site located at
APN:1167-151-77-0000 near the northwest corner of Main Street and Taylor Street,
Packet Pg. 12
C.1
about 0.35 miles from Interstate 215.
The Project will consist of lithium-ion energy batteries installed with racks, inverters,
switchgear, an enclosed transformer substation, a substation control enclosure, a static
mast, and overhead tower to interconnect with the Southern California Edison (SCE)
Highgrove Substation located directly north of the Project site. The proposed
interconnection will exceed the maximum building height; therefore, a Variance
application has been submitted. The batteries will operate with direct current (DC)
electricity that must be converted to alternating current (AC) for compatibility with the
existing electric grid. The facility will provide a service by storing valuable energy and
transferring it to the electrical grid during black out conditions.
The Project improvements will include, but are not limited to perimeter wall and fencing,
landscaping, underground electrical cabling, concrete pad for the BESS equipment,
substation control enclosure, interconnection structures, street dedication, retention
basins, security access gates, lighting, security cameras, and street improvements. An
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal
(attached).
The site is zoned M2-Industrial in the Zoning Map, and it is designated Industrial on the
General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed BESS facility has been classified as a
Quasi-Public Utility and Facility and it is a conditionally permitted use in the Industrial
Zoning Designation.
SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The Project site is primarily undeveloped and contains several drainage pipes. Concrete
swales intercept runoff water from the southeastern corner at Taylor Street traversing
the property towards an existing detention basin located to the northwestern corner. A
storm drain runs along the west side of the property, parallel with Atchinson Topeka and
Santa Fe Railroad Co. tracks. The existing detention basin encompasses about one-
in the detention
basin will be preserved. The BESS equipment will be located to the northeastern and
southern areas of the property which require minimum grading and minimum clearing.
Three detention ponds will be located at the edges of the proposed BESS. About thirty-
five trees located within the proposed BESS areas will be removed; however, 170
existing trees located within the basin area will be protected. The site has a single
abandoned metal structure adjacent to Main Street, to be demolished.
To the north and west side of the property the existing uses are industrial, to the east
there is the Grand Terrace High School and vacant parcel, and the Riverside County
border.
Surrounding uses are as follows:
Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses
North M2-Industrial Industrial SCE Highgrove Substation
Packet Pg. 13
C.1
Riverside Canal Power Co
East Restricted Public and Grand Terrace High School
Manufacturing General Commercial Vacant parcel
South Riverside County Riverside County Industrial
Boundary Boundary
West M2-Industrial Industrial Recycling Center, Miracle
Grow Distribution Center, and
a Pallet Business
ANALYSIS:
General Plan/Zoning Consistency
The site is zoned M2-Industrial and
The proposed Quasi-Public Utility and Facility is consistent with the M2-Industrial zoning
designation. Regulations in the Industrial zoning allow uses to operate free of overly
excessive noise, dust, odor, or other nuisances. The proposed use is a supported by
the zoning with a Conditional Use Permit review process.
Variance
The Applicant submitted a Variance to deviate from the maximum thirty-five (35) foot
height requirement of the Industrial zoning. The BESS will interconnect with the existing
Southern California Edison Highgrove Substation located to the north side of the
property. The interconnection structures will include a fifty-foot (50) high static mast and
a forty-foot (40) high overhead interconnection tower. The proposed heights are
required to meet safety clearance requirements.
Overhead power lines and support interconnection structures already exist in the
zoning. The granting of the Variance will not constitute the grant of special privileges
because several overhead power lines and support structures exceeding thirty-five feet
in height exist in the vicinity and throughout the City of Grand Terrace. Therefore,
attaches with the existing utility infrastructure are
consistent. In addition, the proposed height is a safety requirement by the California
Public Utilities Commission; therefore, granting the Variance will not constitute the grant
of special privileges.
The Variance findings supporting the special circumstance surrounding the project
location have been made and are included on the attached Resolution.
Operation and Objectives
Packet Pg. 14
C.1
The BESS facilitywill provide an economically sound development to receive, store,
and discharge electricity from the SCE-controlled electric grid, including renewable
energy produced by existing solar and wind resources in the region. The facility will
operate year-round and will be available to receive or deliver energy 24 hours a day,
365 days a year. The site will be remotely operated, periodic inspections and
maintenance will be performed as necessary. The use will be compatible with the
existing noise levels of the area and will not exceed noise limits as specified in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The batteries will be designed for aesthetic compatibility within the surrounding area. A
ten-foot landscape buffer along street frontages (Taylor Street and Main Street) and
decorative block walls will keep the use away from public visibility and create an
aesthetically pleasing boundary.
The Project will comply with Public Health and Safety Element which primary role is the
protection of people who live and work within city limits and appropriate measures have
been identified to protect against natural/man-made hazards and to minimize the social,
economic, and environmental disruption from hazardous events. The Applicant has
included in the project description ample information
features, which will include continuous monitoring, shutdown system, built-in safes,
multi-layer fire protection, off-gas detectors, and infrared monitors. In addition, the
Project will require compliance with multiple agencies, including San Bernardino County
Fire, National Fire Protection Association 855 standard, UL Certification, compliance
with applicable National Electric Code, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers Codes.
The project has been conditioned to provide a fully developed Emergency Operations
Plan and identify all safety measures, fire protection plan, fire suppression plan, shutting
down procedures, and notification process. The final Emergency Operations Plan will
require review and approval by the Planning and Development Services Division, San
Bernardino County Fire, and Colton Joint Unified School District.
Access and Circulation
The Project will provide ultimate street improvements at Main Street and a dedication to
the ultimate right of way at Taylor Street. The public improvements will include a
dedication, underground utilities, streetscape, and the Project will comply with the
conditions of approval established by the Public Works Division. Local street
improvements will be designed with proper attention to community appearance and
aesthetics as well as the need to move traffic safely and efficiently. The improvements
will support future development. In addition, the BESS facility will be remotely operated;
therefore, the operational activities will not produce any traffic. The site will be visited
periodically exclusively for inspections, monitoring, testing, and maintenance.
A regional drainage evaluation identified the existing drainage systems tributary to the
project site and identified the existing flood control mitigations to prevent any impacts to
Packet Pg. 15
C.1
the existing drainage. The BESS systems will be located towards the northeast and
south side of the property to avoid disturbance of the existing basin/wetland located to
the northwestern side of the property. Thirty-five trees located within the proposed
BESS areas will be removed; however, 170 existing trees and the existing vegetation
located mainly to the northwest side of the property will be preserved. The sites access
road will meet San Bernardino County Fire standards related to width size, material, and
compaction.
Landscape
The Project is proposing a ten-foot deep densely landscape planter and a nine-foot-tall
decorative block wall at Taylor Street and Main Street. The densely landscape fronting
public streets will include deciduous trees, evergreen trees, palm trees, drought tolerant
plans, and shrubs. The exiting vegetation and trees located to the northwest side of the
property will be preserved. The proposed landscape will be visually pleasing with the
Industrial zoning, harmonious with the nearby development, and create a boundary
separation between existing uses.
AGENCY REVIEW:
The Project Plans were distributed to various agencies and City Departments for review
and comment. Staff received a comment letter from the Colton Joint Unifies School
District on November 17, 2021, in response to the IS/MND draft review period. A
onmental consultant MIG on November 23,
2021, addressing the Unified School District comments and concerns. Both documents
are included with this report.
Conditions of Approval from the City's Building and Safety Division, Public Works
Division, and San Bernardino County Fire are included in the Resolution.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for the above-described project. Based on the Initial Study and supporting
information, the city intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration document and technical studies identified the
land use planning, public services, recreation, greenhouse emissions, aesthetics,
agriculture and forest resources, air quality, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, transportation, and wildfire due to the
incorporation of standard project conditions and mitigation measure(s) under the
Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental 20-09). The Project will comply with
mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program related to Biological, Cultural, and Geology/Soils.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Packet Pg. 16
C.1
The public hearing notice for the Project was published in compliance with the City's
Zoning Code and City Council Resolution No. 2019-24, Expanded Public Noticing and
Outreach Policy for Public Hearings and Public Workshops.
The Public Hearing Notice was published at the Grand Terrace City News (1/4-page
box advertisement), posted in three public places, and mailed to property owners within
1000-feet of the site.
In addition, even though there is no requirement, a public outreach meeting was held on
November 2, 2021, to inform the community about the Environmental Review Process
and to present the PInitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft. Notices
regarding the public outreach meeting were mailed to properties within 1000 radius and
to the reviewing agencies.
The IS/MND review period was initiated on October 14, 2021 and ended on November
15, 2021. was made available
to the public for review at Grand Terrace City Hall, posted in three public places, and
https://www.grandterrace-ca.gov/departments/planning_development_services/planning
RECOMMENDATION:
The -
development and is supported by the M2-Industrial zoning designation and consistent
with existing uses. The proposed block wall, landscape, and street improvements will be
visually harmonious with the surrounding development and create a boundary
separation between existing uses. The findings in support of the Variance have been
made and are included on the Resolution.
The Project will comply with mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider adoption of the attached
Resolution approving the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 (DOCX)
Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (PDF)
Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (PDF)
Condor BESS Facility MMRP (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program).
(PDF)
20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (PDF)
Letter of Intent_ Condor Project Description (PDF)
08 - Condor_Renderings. (PDF)
Packet Pg. 17
C.1
APPROVALS:
Haide Aguirre Completed 11/22/2021 1:16 PM
Steven Weiss Completed 11/22/2021 1:33 PM
Robert Khuu Completed 11/24/2021 8:30 AM
Steven Weiss Completed 11/24/2021 8:42 AM
Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review Board Pending 12/02/2021 6:30
PM
Packet Pg. 18
C.1.a
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL 20-09) PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING
VARIANCE 21-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 20-03, AND SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 20-09 TO DEVELOP A 200-MEGAWATT BATTERY
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (BESS) FACILITY ON AN APPROXIMATE 10-ACRE
SITE \[APN\]: 1167-151-77-0000) WHICH IS
PRIMARILY UNDEVELOPED AND GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE CORNER OF
MAIN STREET AND TAYLOR STREET, ABOUT 0.35 MILES FROM INTERSTATE 215
AND SOUTH CITY BORDERLINE WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Condor Energy Storage, LLC (), represented
by Keith Latham, Vice President of Development at Tenaska, has filed a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP 20-03) and Site and Architectural Review (SA 20-09), proposing to
establish 200-Megawatt Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facility (Project) on a
10-acre site. The Project will consist of lithium-ion energy batteries installed with racks,
inverters, switchgear, and other associated equipment to directly interconnect with the
Southern California Edison (SCE) Highgrove Substation located directly north of the
proposed property. The improvements will include, but are not limited to perimeter wall
and fencing, landscaping, underground electrical cabling, concrete pad for the BESS
equipment, substation control enclosure, static mast, overhead interconnection tower,
undergrounding existing power poles, street dedication with sidewalk, curb and gutter,
water retention basins, security access gates, lighting, security cameras; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a Variance (V 21-01) to deviate from
the thirty-five (35) maximum height requirement, proposing a fifty-foot (50) tall static mast
for lighting and a forty-foot (40) tall overhead tower to support the interconnection
between the proposed BESS and existing Southern California Edison Highgrove
Substation infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, Variance (V 21-01), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 20-03), Site and
Architectural Review (SA 20-09), and Environmental (E 20-09) are collectively referred
to as the (); and
WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned M2-Industrial in the Zoning Map and it is
designated Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map, and
WHEREAS, the Project site is located at APN:1167-151-77-0000 near the
northwest corner of Main Street and Taylor Street, about 0.35 miles from Interstate 215,
and at the southerly city borderline with Riverside County; and
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
WHEREAS, the Project is proposing to demolished an existing abandoned metal
building of approximately 100-feet x 40-feet; and
Packet Pg. 19
C.1.a
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an
Initial Study has been prepared for the above-described Project. Based on the Initial
Study and supporting information, the City intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (E 20-09). The Project will not have a significant effect on the environment
due to the incorporation of standard conditions and mitigation measure(s) related to:
Biological, Cultural, and Geology/Soils; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review board hereby finds that
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has
been prepared for the above-described Project. Based on the Initial Study and
supporting information, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental 20-09)
has been prepared. Based upon the forgoing, all oral and written comments and
reports and presentations made by City staff and members of the public at the
December 2, 2021, public hearing, including any, attachments and exhibits, the
Project will not have a significant effect on the environment due to the incorporation
of standard project conditions and mitigation measure(s) under the Mitigated
Negative Declaration (Environmental 20-09) related to: Biological, Cultural, and
Geology/Soils. The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance except for the maximum building height requirement for
which a Variance has been submitted. Therefore, approval of the Project would
not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, wildfire, greenhouse
emissions, hazardous and hazardous materials, hydrology, water quality, air
quality, mineral resources, land use planning, public services, recreation,
transportation, and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and
public services. The Applicant will comply with mitigation measures contained in
the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program related to Biological, Cultural, and Geology/Soils.
3. Based upon the forgoing, all oral and written comments and reports and
presentations made by City staff and members of the public at the December 2,
2021, public hearing, including any, attachments and exhibits, the Planning
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to
Variance 21-01:
Packet Pg. 20
C.1.a
a. A special circumstance regarding the size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings of the subject property exists. The site is located on the M2-
Industrial zoning and a special circumstance exist regarding the location
and surroundings. The proposed Battery Energy Storage Facility (BESS)
has been classified as a Quasi-Public Utility and Facility which is
conditionally permitted in the M2-Industrial zoning designation. The Project
parcel is located southerly of, and directly adjacent to the existing Southern
California Edison (SCE) Highgrove Substation. This location makes the
property ideally suited to an energy project that requires an interconnection.
The proposed BESS facility is going to interconnect to the existing SCE
Highgrove substation with an overhead power line and supporting
appurtenant structures. These supporting structures include a fifty-foot (50)
in height static mast and a forty-foot (40) high overhead interconnection
tower, which will exceed the maximum zoning height requirement of thirty-
five (35) feet. However, the proposed heights are required to meet safety
clearance requirements as detailed in the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) General Order 95 (GO-95), Rule No.37, Table 1.
Overhead structures with less than thirty-five (35) feet height cannot support
wire sagging and clearances between energized conductors and static
wires; therefore, a Variance has been submitted. In addition, there are
existing overhead power lines exceeding the thirty-five (35) feet
requirement in the existing SCE Highgrove Substation; hence, a special
circumstance surrounding the Project location and surroundings, exist to
support the Variance for the proposed use.
b. Because of the special circumstance, the strict application of the zoning
ordinance deprives the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other
property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The zoning,
location, and surroundings pose a special circumstance that supports the
Variance to exceed the maximum height requirement for the proposed
specific use Quasi-Public Utility and Facility. The Project is proposing to
interconnect with the existing SCE Highgrove Substation located directly
adjacent to the north of the Project site. Overhead power lines and support
interconnection structures already exist in the zoning; therefore,
circumstances are similar to existing Public Utility and Facility (SCE
Highgrove Substation) under the same zoning classification. Furthermore,
supporting the height Variance is not going to deprive the Project of
privileges enjoyed by other properties under the same zoning classification.
c. The granting of the variance will not constitute the grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and
district in which the property is situated. The granting of the Variance to
exceed the maximum height requirement of thirty-five feet will not constitute
the grant of special privileges, because existing Public Utility and Facilities
within the same zoning classification have encounter similar circumstances
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
to support interconnection safety standards by the CPUC. Several
Packet Pg. 21
C.1.a
overhead power lines and support structures exceeding thirty-five feet in
height exist in the vicinity and interconnect to the existing SCE Highgrove
Substation. Allowing the interconnection structures would be
consistent with the allowance of these existing utilities and therefore will not
constitute the grant of special privileges.
d. The granting of the variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not
otherwise expressly authorized by the district governing the parcel of
property. The Project site is zoned M-2-Industrial, and it is designated
Industrial in the General Plan Land Use Plan. Public Utilities and Facilities
are supported in the zoning with a Conditional Use Permit. The BESS facility
is requesting a Variance for the height restrictions to support the
interconnection to the SCE Highgrove Substation. The proposed height is
necessary to meet the safety clearances as identified in the GO_95 of the
California Public Utilities Commission.
e. The granting of the Variance will not result in a situation inconsistent with
the latest adopted General Plan. The granting of the Variance will not be
inconsistent with the M2-Industrial Zoning district and will not be
inconsistent with the Industrial Designation of the General Plan.
f. Conditions necessary to secure the above findings are made a part of the
approval of the variance.
4. Based upon the forgoing, all oral and written comments and reports and
presentations made by City staff and members of the public at the December 2,
2021, public hearing, including any, attachments and exhibits, the Planning
Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect
Conditional Use Permit 20-03:
a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed Project or within the city. The proposed
is consistent with the M2-
Industrial zoning, which supports Public Utilities and Facilities. The
proposed development plan meets the purpose of the zoning, and it meets
the applicable development standards except for the maximum height
requirement. The interconnection structures will meet the safety height
interconnection requirement established by the California Public Utilities
Commission. The proposed Battery Energy Storage Facility will be remotely
operated and will be visited periodically for inspections, monitoring, testing,
and maintenance; therefore, the site will not produce any traffic. In addition,
the batteries will be compatible with the existing noise levels of the area and
will not exceed noise limits as specified in the Zoning Ordinance. The
batteries will be designed for aesthetic compatibility with the surrounding
area. The Project will include decorative block walls, perimeter landscaping,
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
security, lighting, a fire protection plan, a fire suppression plan, and
compliance with the National Fire Protection Association Standards for the
Packet Pg. 22
C.1.a
installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems.The batteries will be UL
Certified and will include built-in fail safes and multi-layered redundant fire
protection features designed to prevent thermal runaway and the spread of
fire. The Alternating Current (AC) power and collection system will meet
all applicable National Electrical Code and institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers codes and standards. The BESS will continuously
monitor the cell voltage and temperature and will shut down the system for
any abnormalities. The battery enclosures will include redundant off-gas
detectors and infrared monitors to provide early warning for thermal
runaway scenarios and will include deflagration vents and/or pressure
panels to relieve buildup of gases and prevent explosions. The Project will
also meet the International Fire Code and will conform with the San
Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval. In addition, the Project will
comply with mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program related to
Biological, Cultural, and Geology/Soils. Based on the items above stated,
the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed Project or within the city.
b. The proposed use will not be injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or within the city. The proposal will include street
improvements at Main Street and a dedication to the ultimate right of way
at Taylor Street. The street improvements will include a dedication,
underground utilities, streetscape, and the Project will comply with the
conditions of approval established by the Public Works Division. A regional
drainage evaluation prepared by Q3 identified the existing drainage
systems tributary to the Project site and identified the existing flood control
mitigations to prevent any impacts to the existing drainage. The BESS
systems will be located towards the northeast and south side of the property
to avoid disturbance of the existing wetland located to the northwestern side
of the property. Conditions have been included to mitigate potential impacts;
therefore, the Project will not be injurious to property or improvements.
c. The use is consistent with the M2-Industrial zoning designation and
compatible with other surrounding uses. The proposed Battery Energy
Storage Facility has been classified as a Public Utility and Facility and it is
supported by the M2-Industrial zoning designation. In addition, Southern
California Edison Highgrove Substation is an existing Public Utility and
Facility; therefore, the proposal is consistent and compatible with other uses
in the zoning.
d. Conditions necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code and General Plan have been applied to the Project.
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4. Based upon all oral and written comments and reports and presentations made by
City staff and members of the public at the December 2, 2021, public hearing,
Packet Pg. 23
C.1.a
including any, attachments and exhibits,the Planning Commission/Site and
Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to Site and Architectural
Review 20-09:
a. The Project is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code and General Plan. The proposed Public Utility and Facility is
consistent with the M2-Industrial zoning designation under the c
Map. Regulations in the Industrial zoning allow uses to operate free of overly
excessive noise, dust, odor, or other nuisances. The proposed -
Public Utility and Facility is a supported use, and the proposal will meet the
development standards established in the zoning, except the maximum
height requirement proposing overhead interconnection, for which a
Variance has been submitted.
The Project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element, Goal 2.4
which supports industrial land uses designed to generate employment
opportunities and support Policy 2.4.2, to promote the development of light
non-polluting industrial uses in the City. The proposed BESS will provide an
economically sound development to receive, store, and discharge electricity
from the SCE-controlled electric grid, including renewable energy produced
by existing solar and wind resources in the region. The Project will also
support Policy 2.4.4 to provide buffering to prevent potential land use
incompatibilities between industrial areas and other areas shall be given
special consideration. Specific features could include increased setbacks,
walls, berms, and landscaping. The BESS will be designed for aesthetic
compatibility within the surrounding area. In addition, the Project will include
a ten-foot landscape buffer along street frontages (Taylor Street and Main
Street) and decorative block walls to keep the use away from public visibility
and to create an aesthetically pleasing boundary.
The Project is consistent with the Circulation Element Goal 3.2 to provide
for a well-maintained roadway system, Policy 3.2.1 to dedicate ultimate
right-of-way at Taylor Street frontage and comply with the public
improvements included on the Conditions of Approval by the Public Works
Division, and Policy 3.3.3 to ensure that local street improvements are
designed with proper attention to community appearance and aesthetics as
well as the need to move traffic safely and efficiently. The Project will be
operated remotely, and periodic inspections and maintenance will be
performed as necessary; therefore, the Project will not cause any
commercial traffic. In addition, street improvements will be provided to align
with future development.
The Project will comply with Open Space and Conservation Element which
preserves and protects natural resources, such as the protection of sensitive
habitat. The Project is consistent with Goal 4.9 which requires compliance
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
with state and federal regulations to ensure the protection of historical,
archaeological, and paleontological resources. The city has taken steps to
Packet Pg. 24
C.1.a
ensure that cultural resources have been identifiedand evaluated to assure
that appropriate action is taken. In compliance with the Open Space and
Conservation Element, the Applicant has prepared a Water Quality
Management Plan and a Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation Report
and a Regional Drainage Evaluation. The mitigated recommendation on the
Regional Drainage Evaluation have been included in the conditions of
approval.
The Project will comply with Public Health and Safety Element which primary
role is the protection of people who live and work within city limits and
appropriate measures have been identified to protect against natural/man-
made hazards and to minimize the social, economic, and environmental
disruption from hazardous events. The Project has identified ample
information within the Project description regarding the Project safety
features, including continuous monitoring, shutdown system, built-in safes,
multi-layer fire protection, off-gas detectors, and infrared monitors. In
addition, the Project will require compliance with multiple agencies, such as
San Bernardino County Fire, National Fire Protection Association 855
standard, UL Certification, compliance with applicable National Electric
Code, and institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Codes.
The IS/MND identified no impact or less than a significant impact on the
following areas: aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality,
greenhouse emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and
water quality, mineral resources, noise, transportation, and wildfire due to
the incorporation of standard Project conditions and mitigation measure(s)
under the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental 20-09) related to:
Biological, Cultural, and Geology/Soils. The Applicant will comply with
mitigation measures contained in the IS/MND related to Biological, Cultural,
and Geology/Soils.
The proposed Public Utility and Facility will be consistent with the intent of
the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan and will be compatible
with surrounding uses.
b. The location and configuration of the development plan associated with this
Project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and
structures, that they do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy, that they do
not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public
areas and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the
area. The Project site is surrounded by industrial uses to the north, west,
and south, and Colton Unified School District/High School is located to the
east. The Project will include a ten-foot densely landscape buffer at the
street frontages to create an aesthetically pleasing boundary. The proposed
use is supported in the Industrial zoning and some of the taller components
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
of the BESS facility will be visible from the street; however, the battery units
will not be visible from public streets. The proposed street improvements will
Packet Pg. 25
C.1.a
enhancethe area and be visually harmonious with the site and surrounding
uses.
c. The architectural design of structures, their materials, and colors are visually
harmonious with the surrounding development, natural landforms, are
functional for the Project and are consistent with the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code. The proposed Battery Energy Storage System at
the Project will include self-contained batteries that will be designed to be
aesthetically compatible with the surrounding area. The perimeter block wall
will enclose the site to screen the battery units from public view and the
proposed landscaping at the street frontage will provide a transitional buffer.
The proposed substation control enclosure, main power transformer,
overhead interconnection structures will be visible from the street; however,
similar overhead interconnection structures are already located within the
zoning in support Public Utility and Facilities. In relation to the existing
natural landforms, the existing basin located to the northwest side of the
Project will be preserved and will be managed in accordance with Regional
Water Quality Control Board, California Department of fish and Wildlife. The
Project will avoid the basin wetland area and minimize impacts as included
in the IS/MND and the Regional Drainage Evaluation. The project will
include three detention ponds. Overall, the proposal will be visually
harmonious with the surrounding development, natural forms will be
preserved, and the Project will be consistent with the Municipal Code.
d. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and
visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious
with the natural landscape of the area and nearby developments. The
Project is proposing a ten-foot deep densely landscape planter and a nine-
foot-tall decorative block wall at Taylor Street and Main Street. The densely
landscape fronting public streets will include deciduous trees, evergreen
trees, palm trees, drought tolerant plans, and shrubs. The exiting vegetation
and trees located to the northwest side of the property, encompass about a
quarter of the sit size, and will be preserved. The Project will be
conditioned to include climbing vines to dress-up the decorative block wall.
The landscape and streetscape will be consistent with the zoning and
support future development. The proposed landscape will be visually
pleasing with the Industrial zoning, harmonious with the nearby
development, and create a boundary separation between existing uses.
e. There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or
natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus
the natural beauty of the City, its setting and natural landforms are
preserved. The BESS are proposed to be constructed on relatively level
areas located to the northeast and south sides of the property; these areas
will have minimum grading and clearing of property. Thirty-five (35) trees
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
located within the proposed BESS areas will be removed; however, one-
Packet Pg. 26
C.1.a
hundred and seventy (170)existing trees and the existing vegetation
located mainly to the northwest side of the property will be preserved.
f. The design and location of all signs associated with this Project are
consistent with the scale and character of the building to which they are
attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code. The Project does not include a sign at this time;
however, a condition has been included requiring the submittal of a sign
application for review and approval prior to constructing any business signs.
g. Conditions of approval for this Project necessary to secure the purposes of
the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan have been applied to
the Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the forgoing, upon all oral and written
comments and reports and presentations made by City staff and members of the public
at the public hearing on December 2, 2021, including any, attachments, and exhibits,
Environmental 20-09, Conditional Use Permit 20-03, Variance 21-01, and Site and
Architectural Review 20-09 are hereby adopted and approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. This Project is approved to establish a 200-megawatt Battery Energy Storage
System (BESS) facility on a 10-acre parcel generally located near the corner of
Main Street and Taylor Street (APN: 1167-151-77-0000), zoned M2-Industrial.
This approval is granted based on the application materials submitted by Condor
Energy Storage, LLC () represented by Keith Latham, Vice President of
Development at Tenaska on December 10, 2020, including multiple revised
documents and the latest Project plans received on October 4, 2021. The
proposed Project will consist of lithium-ion energy batteries installed with racks,
inverters, switchgear, an enclosed transformer substation area 34.5KV to 115kV
main power transformer, a substation control enclosure, a 50-foot-tall static mast
for lightning, and a 40-foot-tall overhead tower, and other associated equipment to
directly interconnect into the Southern California Edison (SCE) Highgrove
Substation located directly north of the Project site. The proposed interconnection
will exceed the maximum zoning height requirement; therefore, a Variance
application has been submitted. The BESS structures will have battery storage
racks separated with relay and communications systems for automated monitoring
and managing of the batteries to ensure design performance. Batteries operate
with direct current (DC) electricity that must be converted to alternating current
(AC) for compatibility with the existing electric grid. Power inverters to convert
between AC and DC will be located outside the purpose-built containers, along
with transformers to step up the voltage. The proposed facility will provide a service
by receiving energy (charging) from the transmission system via the Highgrove
Substation, storing energy, and then later delivering energy (discharging) back to
the point of interconnection. The Project has identified numerous fire protection
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
and fire suppression measures. The Project improvements will include, but are not
limited to perimeter wall and fencing, perimeter landscaping, underground
Packet Pg. 27
C.1.a
electrical cabling, concrete pad forthe electrical equipment, and street
improvements. An initial study/mitigated negative declaration has been prepared
for this proposal. The application materials are approved as submitted and
conditioned herein and shall not be further altered except as modified by these
conditions of approval and mitigation measures, and unless reviewed and
approved by the affected departments.
2. The BESS facility will operate year-round and will be available to receive or deliver
energy 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The site will be remotely operated, and
periodic inspections and maintenance will be performed as necessary.
th
3. If not appealed, this approval shall become effective on the eleventh (11) day
after the date of the
thth
following such eleventh (11) day when the eleventh (11) day is not a city
business day. This approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of
adoption of this resolution unless building permits have been issued and a
substantial investment in reliance of those permits has occurred; all conditions of
approval have been met; or a time extension has been granted by the City, in
accordance with Chapter 18.83, Chapter 18.63, and Chapter 18.86 of the Zoning
Code. Time extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration
date.
4. Minor modifications to this approval which are determined by the Planning and
Development Services Director to be in substantial conformance with the approved
site plan, and which do not intensify or change the use or require any deviations
from adopted standards, may be approved by the Planning and Development
Services Director upon submittal of an application and the required fee consistent
with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
5. Revisions or modifications requested by the Applicant, including but not limited to,
changes to the conditions, expansions, intensity, or hours of operation shall be
processed in the same manner as the original approval consistent with Municipal
Code Chapter 18.83 and Chapter 18.63.
6. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand
Terrace and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees,
or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval
of the City of Grand Terrace concerning this Project, including but not limited
to any approval or condition of approval of the Planning Commission, or
Planning and Development Services Director. The City shall promptly notify the
Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the Project and the
City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the
right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its
officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 28
C.1.a
7.Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the
content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services Department.
8. If exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall
prevail.
9. Operational and construction activities associated with the Project shall comply
the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code.
10. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable law, including but not limited to all
Federal, State, County and Local laws, at all times.
11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall provide a
final draft of the Emergency Operations Plan to be reviewed and approved by the
Planning and Development Services Division, San Bernardino County Fire, and
Colton Joint Unified School District (Grand Terrace High School). The Emergency
Operations Plan shall be consistent with the National Fire Protection Association
requirements and include a Fire Protection Plan and Fire Suppression Plan, as
identified in the letter of intent, including the following:
Battery supplier selection and resulting detailed design in compliance with
California fire Code Section 1206 and National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) Standard 855, for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage
Systems.
UL Certification for the inverters
Battery design, AC power, and collection system compliance with all
applicable National Electrical Code (NED) and Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) codes and standards.
Battery cells/modules/ racks will be cooled with a circulating water/glycol
mixture.
The BESS will continuously monitor cell voltage and temperature and will
shut the system down for any abnormalities.
Lithium-ion batteries will be UL 9540 A tested to demonstrate prevention of
fire propagation.
Battery enclosure or facility will include off-gas detectors/infrared monitors
to provide early warning for thermal runaway scenarios.
Battery enclosure designs will include deflagration vents and/or pressure
panels to relieve buildup of off gases and prevent explosions.
Layout will be designed to comply with International Fire Code 2018, as
applicable.
First responder training will be developed in conjunction with the battery
original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and the engineering,
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
procurement, and construction (EPC) contractor.
Notification standard procedures.
Packet Pg. 29
C.1.a
Emergency notification agencies list and phone numbers
12. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Colton Joint Unified
School District (Grand Terrace High School) shall be provided the opportunity to
review, comment on, and approve the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
pursuant to Condition 11 to ensure immediate notification of Colton Joint Unified
School District personnel are provided in the event of an emergency situation that
could impact the Colton Joint Unified School District staff and its students.
Documentation shall be provided to the City prior to the Project being fully
energized that verifies Colton Joint Unified School District was provided an
opportunity to review and comment along with how potential comments were
addressed by the Applicant, Assignee, or a subsequent operator.
13. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace
Building and Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in the
October 20, 2021, attached hereto as
Exhibit 1.
14. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace
Public Works Director, including the conditions of approval contained in the
November 11, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
15. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County
Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including
the conditions of approval contained under Permit Number: FPLN-2020-00139,
dated March 01, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
16. Prior to the issuance of a building permit by the Building and Safety Division, the
Applicant shall provide a will service letter and obtain all requisite permits and
clearances from Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWCO), including
addressing the RHWCO concerns regarding multiple wells located within the
general proximity of the Project.
17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall comply with all the
requirements of the City of Colton Water and Wastewater Department, relating to
sewer service requirements.
18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall obtain all clearances
from Burrtec for trash collection services.
19. The Applicant shall comply with all Mitigation Measures included on the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist of the Initial Study dated October 21,
2021, attached hereto as Exhibit 4. This includes but is not limited to the following:
a. Biological Resources, BIO-1 & 2
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
b. Cultural Resources, CUL-1, 2, 3, 4, & 5
c. Geology and Soils, GEO-1, 2, 3, & 4
Packet Pg. 30
C.1.a
20. The Applicant shall comply with all Mitigated Conditions include on the Q3,
Regional Drainage Evaluation, dated September 17, 2021. This includes but is not
limited to the following:
Restrict the two outlets to maximize the existing detention basin storage
Restrict the onsite culvert (36-inch CMP) and regrade the area around the
existing RC swale to promote and add more storage upstream of the
existing basins.
21. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit three (3) copies
of landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning and Development Services
Department for review and approval. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be
(Chapter 15.56) Landscaping Standards contained in Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning
Code, in compliance with the most recent version of the State Model Ordinance.
The plans shall demonstrate the following:
a. The proposed landscape fronting the public streets (Taylor Street and Main
Street) shall be dense and include drought tolerant planting and ground
cover.
b. The proposed parkway trees shall comply with the streetscape identified on
the design guidelines provided by the city to match future development.
(Gateway Specific Plan).
c. Ensure that proposed plant material, at maturity, will maintain clear line
d. Plant material adheres to spacing recommendations based on plant and
shrub species.
e. Include vines along the decorative block walls and wrought iron fencing and
provide proper irrigation. Vines planting material shall be a minimum 15-
gallon.
f. The proposed landscape shall incorporate a drip irrigation system.
g. The landscaping plans shall include a legend: type of species, including
common and scientific name of the planting, size, landscape percentage.
h. All trees shall be a minimum size of 15-gallon, having a minimum height of
eight feet at the time of planting.
i. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 1-gallon size at the time of planting.
j. Ground cover shall be healthy, dense foliage, and well routed cuttings, or
one-gallon container plants.
k. The spacing of trees and shrubs shall be appropriate for the species used.
l. Twenty percent of planting material shall be pollinating plants.
m. Approval must be obtained for removal of all trees having a trunk diameter
of 10 inches or more measured 48 inches above existing grade.
n. The incorporation of mulch, decorative rock, shall be used in small
quantities as filler between plans, but shall not take be used in place of
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
planting material.
o. Submit an initial deposit of $2,000 deposit for landscape plan check review.
Packet Pg. 31
C.1.a
22. Construction activities, including traffic and material deliveries shall be prohibited
during the Grand Terrace High School peak hours, identified as 30 minutes prior
to start of school (7:20 a.m.) and 30-minutes after dismissal (2:25 p.m.) to avoid
traffic congestion. The Applicant or assignee shall provide a Project construction
delivery staging and operating schedule to the City for the purpose of avoiding
conflicts with Grand Terrace High School. The schedule shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning and Development Services Department.
23. Under no condition shall there be stockpiling of material prior to the issuance of
the first grading permit and related conditions of approval for the grading permit.
24. The Planning and Development Services Director shall periodically evaluate the
Project use to ensure it is operated in a manner consistent with the conditions of
approval, including the mitigation measures included in the initial study dated
October 11, 2021. If adverse impacts are identified, the Conditional Use Permit
shall be reviewed, pursuant to Section 18.83.032 (Revisions or modifications).
25. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall obtain a
such license shall be
renewed annually for as long as the business remains in operation.
26. Proposed lighting shall not produce any glare onto adjoining properties and shall
be shielded as may be required. Lighting shall not exceed eighteen feet in height
from the finished grade and shall be designed to reflect away from residential
district and public roadways. A photometric plan shall be included in the
construction plans for review.
27. Prior to the construction of perimeter fencing on shared property lines, the
Applicant shall submit a Fence/Wall Agreement signed by the adjacent property
owners. As an alternative, the proposed wall and fences shall be constructed
inside the Projects property lines.
28. The Applicant shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES).
29. The Applicant shall include on the construction plans, the material for the proposed
interior access roads. The proposed access roads within the site shall meet the
requirements of San Bernardino County Fire and the City of Grand Terrace,
including road width, material, and compaction. Gravel shall not be used as an
acceptable access road material.
30. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall provide the
Planning and Development Services Division a copy of the legal easement access
documentation for the overhead interconnection with Southern California Edison.
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 32
C.1.a
31.Should the construction of a trash enclosurebe needed in the future, a separate
administrative review and approval and building permit shall be obtained. The trash
enclosure shall be no less than six feet in height, constructed of decorative block
walls, with solid metal gates attached to posts, embedded in concrete.
32. The construction plan submittal shall include a detail of the interconnection
between the proposed BESS facility and SCE Highgrove Substation, a detail for
the detention basins, and a floor plan for the proposed substation control
enclosure.
33. Any future changes in on-site activities shall require submittal, review, and
approval of a modified conditional use permit.
34. Any future development on the site, including alterations, conversions, remodels,
and new structures shall require compliance with the Municipal Code.
35. All ground mounted equipment, including backflow devices and hydrants shall be
screened in a manner that does not impede traffic visibility.
36. The Applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and
maintenance of the site.
37. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance
with all City codes.
38. The Applicant shall obtain a sign approval by the Planning Division and a sign
building permit by the Building and Safety division prior to the installation of any
business signs.
39. The Applicant or assignee shall submit a lighting and security camera plan that
demonstrate onsite and offsite monitoring. The Security Plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning and Development Director prior to the issuance of
a certificate of use and occupancy.
40. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall prepare the
BESS decommissioning guidelines and requirement to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning and Development Services Division. The decommissioning
standards shall include requirements for collection and recycling of all equipment
in accordance with all applicable law, including but not limited to all applicable
Federal, State and City regulations, and it shall include timelines for complete
decommission and removal of equipment, and notification thereof to the City.
41. Should operational activities cease, the Applicant shall initiate decommission and
removal of all equipment within thirty days and the complete site restoration shall
be completed withing 120 days and decommission activities shall follow the
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
decommissioning guidelines.
Packet Pg. 33
C.1.a
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace,
nd
California, at a regular meeting and public hearing held on the 2 day of December 2021.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Steven A. Weiss Edward Giroux
Planning Development Services Planning Commission Chairman
Director
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 34
C.1.a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I Steven Weiss of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2021-XX was duly passed,
approved and adopted by the Planning Commission, approved and signed by the
Chairman, and attested by the Planning and Development Services Director, at the
nd
regular meeting of said Planning Commission held on the 2 day of December 2021, and
that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
nd
Executed this 2 day of December 2021, at Grand Terrace, California.
___________________________
Steven A. Weiss, AICP
Planning and Development Services
Director
Attachment: Resolution_Battery Energy Storage Facility_11.19.2021 \[Revision 9\] (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 35
C.1.b
Building and Safety Conditions of Approval
Date: October 20, 2021
File No:CUP 20-03 – Condor Energy Storage, LLC (“Applicant”)
Applicant: Condor Energy Group
Address of Applicant:14302 FNB Pkwy, Omaha, NE 68154
Site Location:Corner of Main St. and Taylor St.
APN: 1167-151-77-0000
Subject: 200-Megawatt Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)
Provide four (4)sets of construction plans and documentation for plan review of the
proposed project. Below you will find a list of the plans and documents Building and Safety
will need forplan review. The initialplan review will take approximatelytwo weeks on most
projects.
Provide the following sets of plans and documents.
Building and Safety submittalrequired at first plan review.
(4)ArchitecturalPlans
(2) Structural/FoundationPlans
(2)Structural Calculations
(4)Plot/Site Plans
(2)Electrical& EquipmentPlans(for reference only if under CPUC jurisdiction)
(2)Demolition Plans
(2) AsbestosReports
(2) Soils Reports
(4) Precise Grading Plans
(4) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
(4) Best Management Plan (BMP)
(4) Drainage Plans
(2) Water QualityManagement Plans (WQMP)
Packet Pg. 36
C.1.b
Building and Safety Conditions of Approval
Building & Safety General Information
All structures shall be designed in accordance with the currently adopted building codesby
the State of Californiaand City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code as adoptedat time of plan
submittal.Note if a new code has been adopted priorto the submittal, then all structures
shall be designed to the current model code year.
The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The
Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to
requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall signthe
bottom of theJob Cardor Certificate of Occupancy Clearance Form.
Building & Safety inspection requests can be madetwenty-four(24) hours in advance for
next day inspection. Please contact 909-825-3825. You may also request inspections at
theBuilding & Safetycounter.
All construction sites must be protected by a security fenceand screening. The fencing
and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians.
Temporary toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers.The toiletfacilities
shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer
type shall conform toANSI ZA.3.
Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical
Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project
unless one of the following items isin place and approved by Building & Safety and the
Planning Division.
(A)Installation of a construction trailer,or,
(B)Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located.
Installation of construction/salestrailers must be located on private property. No trailers
can be located in the public street right of way.
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Separate plan submittals and permits are required for all accessory structuresincluding but
not limited topatios, block walls,storage buildings,community playgrounds, etc.
Pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code Section 6735, most projects are
required to be designed by a California Licensed Architect or Engineer. The project owner
Packet Pg. 37
C.1.b
Building and Safety Conditions of Approval
or developer should review the section ofthe California Codes and comply with the
regulation.
Building & SafetyConditions
1.A building permit shall be required for the placement of the proposedbattery
energy storage systems.A separate permit shall be required for the perimeter
block walland demolition of any existing buildings.
2.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain
clearances from alldepartments andexternal agencies involved in the review
of this project including San Bernardino County Fire, Public Works, Planning,
andBurlington Northern SantaFe Railroad (BNSF) to access any railroad
easements.
3.Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad
certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete
placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevation and setbacks of
the structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in
conformance with the Precise GradingPlans. Compaction reportsshall
accompany pad certifications. The certifications are required to be signed by
the engineer of record.
4.Prior to theissuance of a building permit, the applicantshall pay all applicable
Development Improvement Fee’s tothe City; this alsoincludesschool fees,
Public Works fees,and outside agency feesincludingbut not limited to Colton
Wastewater, Riverside-HighlandWaterCo.and utilities. Copies of receipts
shall be provided to Building & Safety priorto permit issuance.
5.All construction projectsshall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems (NPDES), and the San Bernardino County MS-4 Storm
Water Permit.
6.Prior to building permit issuance,the applicant shall establish haul services
for construction waste material with Burrtec to facilitate the recycling of all
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
recoverable/recyclablematerial as requiredunder the California GreenCode
and City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
7.The applicant shall submit acompletedConstruction & Demolition (C&D)
WasteDiversion Program/ Waste Management Plan (WMP) form along with
payment of the required C&D deposit.
Packet Pg. 38
C.1.b
Building and Safety Conditions of Approval
8.All on site utilities shall be underground to the new proposed structure unless
prior approval has been obtained by the utility company of the City.
9.Prior to issuance of building permits, on site water service shall be installed
and approved by the responsible agency. On site fire hydrants shall be
approved by the Fire Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on
the site until the firehydrants are established and approved.
10.Provide civil engineering drawings for dedication of 15 foot right of way and all
public right of way improvements including curb, gutter and half street width
improvements. Civil engineering drawings and dedications shall be submitted
to Public Works and be check by the City Engineer / Public Works Director
then recorded with the County Recorder’soffice before permits are issued.
11.Prior to issuance of any demolition permits, anasbestos abatement
certification shall besubmittedto the Building Divisionalong withproof of
notification of demolition to theSouth Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD).
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 39
C.1.b
Public Works Comments
Date: November 11, 2021
File No:
Applicant: CUP 20-03, Architectural Review 20-09, and Environmental 20-09
Applicant: Condor Energy Storage, LLC
Site Location:Near Corner of Main Street and Taylor Street
APN: 1167-151-77-0000
From the provided application, here are the comments for the proposed project. Should the proposed
use or scope change, a re-submittal will be required for review and applicable conditions of approval
will apply.
Thank you.
Below is a list of the plans and documents Public Works will need for plan review at the final
engineering stage.
Public Works submittal required at first plan review (Only if there are changes to existing)
Street Improvement Plans for Main Street between Taylor Street to the westerly property line,
including the curb return at the intersection and any transitions.
Street Improvement Plans for Taylor Street between Main Street to the northerly property line,
including the curb return at the intersection and any transitions.
Water Utility Plans if new lateral or service required.
Utility Plan Sheets
Sewer Plan Sheets if new sewer lateral is required
Water Quality Management Plan only if modifying 5000 sf area or more.
Vehicle trip generation analysis showing exiting trips versus proposed trips
Public Works General Information
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public
Works Standards or standards approved by the Public Works Director or City Engineer.
Public Works inspection requests can be made forty-eight (48) hours in advance for next day
inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety
public counter.
Packet Pg. 40
C.1.b
Public Works Comments
All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening. The fencing and screening
shall always be maintained to protect pedestrians.
Public Works Comments
1.Prior to Permit, providearevisedsiteplanindicatingthecorrectlay-outofthe
projectandsiteconditions.
2.Dedicatefullrightofwayandprovidefull roadwayimprovementsforMainStreet
andTaylorStreet.Rightofwaywidth requirementis88feet,with curb to curb width
of60feet.
3.Providewaterqualitymanagementplan(WQMP),includingpreliminarysoilsreport
withpercolationrate;hydrologyandhydraulics;andrequireddesignelements.
4.Providestreetimprovementand lighting plans.
5.Providestorm drain orrelated improvementplansbasedonhydrology/hydraulicsstudy.
6.Provideaprecisegradingplanforthefacilityincludingstormwaterpollutionprevention
plan(SWPPP) withbestmanagementpractice(BMP).
7.Provide letter from engineer detailing the project trip generation.
8.Historical or existing storm water-flow from adjacent lots must be received and
directed by gravity to the street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage
easement.
9.Prior to the plan submission, a site and architectural review for any proposed use shall
be reviewed and approved by the City’s Planning Commission.
10.Provide that all utilities shall be placedunderground if not already provided as
required.
11.Repair/ replace any street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalks, match up
paving andstreetlights if not already provided as required above and as directed by
City Engineer. All paving fronting development shall be resurfaced or installed new up
to centerline of streets.
12.All plans shall be designed, and improvements constructed by person registered and
licensed to perform such work pursuant to the State of California Business and
Professions Code, which shall comply with the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. 1997 U.B.C. and the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
13.Pay all required fees, obtain all permits, inspections and approval on all work to be
done.
14.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay all Development
Improvement Fee’s including Traffic Signal and Circulation to the City as established
by Ordinance 190 and pay school fees to Colton Joint Unified School District as
applicable.
Packet Pg. 41
C.1.b
Public Works Comments
15.Encroachment permits are required before all work begins in the public right of way.
A street cut deposit will be collected for each street cut and held for two years.Streets
are newly paved and will require additional work to preserve their integrity such as “T”
cuts, grind and overlay and or slurry seal of the full width.
16.The Applicant shall submit proposed sewer plans to the City of Colton for plan review
if applicable. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the sewer
review to the City of Colton and provide a written “Will Serve” letter and approved
sewer plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued if applicable.
17.The applicant shall submit proposed water plans to the Riverside Highland Water
Company for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for
the water review to Riverside Highland Water Company. Please provide a written
“Will Serve” letter and approved plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits
are issued.
18.Monumentation: If any activity on this project will disturb any land survey
monuments, the disturbed monumentation shall be located and referenced by or under
the directionof a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer authorized to
practice land surveying prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to
disturb the monumentation, and a corner record or record of survey of the references
shall be filled with the County.
19.All plan submittals to the City shall use the attached ‘Improvement Plan Checklist’
when preparing the improvement plans, including the Estimate of Quantities, as
detailed on Section D of the Improvement Plan Checklist.
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 42
C.1.b
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 43
C.1.b
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 44
C.1.b
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 45
C.1.b
Tbo!Cfsobsejop!Dpvouz!Gjsf!Efqbsunfou
Dpnnvojuz!Tbgfuz!Ejwjtjpo
Qmbo!Sfwjfx!Dpnnfout
Date Reviewed:03/01/2021
Reviewed By:Mike Havens
Project Type:Fire Planning/DRC
Permit Number:FPLN-2020-00139
Project Name:Condor Energy Storage Project
Project Description:The proposed project consists of a 200-megawatt battery energy storage
system (BESS) located on an approximately 10-acre parcel of land located at
21660 Main Street in Grand Terrace, CA. The proposed project will consist of
lithium-ion energy batteries installed in racks, inverters, switchgear, and other
associated equipment to directly interconnect into the Southern California
Edison (SCE) Highgrove Substation (point of interconnection) located
immediately adjacent to the northern property limits.
Location:21750 MAIN ST
GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324
APN:1167151770000
Dear Applicant,
San Bernardino County Fire Department has completed review of the proposed project. Please see the
FIRE COMMENTS attachment below.
Redline Plans can be downloaded from the San Bernardino County EZ Online Permitting (EZOP) system at
http://av-ezop.sbcounty.gov. Guidance on how to access and navigate the EZOP portal can be found at
http://wp.sbcounty.gov/ezop/faqs/videos/.
If you have any questions please contact County Fire at (909) 386-8400.
Sincerely,
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
The Office of the Fire Marshal
Community Safety Division
San Bernardino County Fire Department
Page 1 of 3
v.19.02.0
Packet Pg. 46
C.1.b
Review Date:03/01/2021
Permit Number:FPLN-2020-00139
Location:21750 MAIN ST
GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324
APN:1167151770000
GJSF!DPNNFOUT
Haz-Mat Approval
The applicant shall contact the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Hazardous Materials Division (909) 386-
8401 for review and approval of building plans, where the planned use of such buildings will or may use hazardous
materials or generate hazardous waste materials.
Water System
Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this
development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using
California Fire Code. The Fire Flow for this project shall be: ___1500__ GPM for a ___2__hour duration at 20 psi
residual operating pressure.
Water System Certification
The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water company, certifying that the
required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance
and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the job
site.
Commercial Addressing
Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the
building with numbers that are a minimum six (6) inches in height and with a three quarter (3/4) inch stroke. The
street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically
illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional
non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.
Key Box
An approved Fire Department key box is required. In commercial, industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing
gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.
Standard A-1 FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
This standard shall apply to the design, construction and maintenance of all new fire apparatus access roads within
the jurisdiction, as well as fire apparatus access roads at existing facilities when applied at the discretion of the fire
code official.
Standard A-3 GATES AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS TO FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
This standard shall apply to all obstructions, access control devices, traffic calming devices, or other similar systems
within any roadways that serve as fire access in all new or existing residential, commercial, and industrial
development. This standard does not apply to obstructions within parking aisles that do not serve as fire apparatus
access roads.
Standard B-1 PREMISE AND BUILDING IDENTIFICATION AND ADDRESSING
This standard applies to the marking of all buildings with address numbers for identification.
Page 2 of 3
v.19.02.0
Packet Pg. 47
C.1.b
Standard W-2 ONSITE FIRE PROTECTION WATER SYSTEMS
This standard establishes minimum requirements for installation and maintenance of all private fire hydrants and
appliances related to an onsite fire protection system.
Additional Requirements
In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other onsite and offsite improvements may be required which
cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete
improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office.
1. One way Direction required to show the flow of access on site
2. Show on Plans the gate width per Standard A-3
3. Indicate the Turning Radius on the plans per Standard A-1
Attachment: Agency Review Comments, Exhibits (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Page 3 of 3
v.19.02.0
Packet Pg. 48
C.1.c
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility
Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Lead Agency:
City of Grand Terrace
Planning and Development Services
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
Prepared by:
MIG, Inc.
1650 Spruce Street, Suite 106
Riverside, California 92507
October 11, 2021
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 49
C.1.c
- This document is designed for double-sided printing -
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 50
C.1.c
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 –Purpose of CEQA ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 –Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 2
2 Project Description..................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 –Project Title ............................................................................................................... 5
2.2 –Lead Agency Name and Address ............................................................................. 5
2.3 –Contact Person and Phone Number ......................................................................... 5
2.4 –Project Location ........................................................................................................ 5
2.5 –Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ...................................................................... 5
2.6 –General Plan Land Use Designation ......................................................................... 5
2.7 –Zoning District ........................................................................................................... 5
2.8 –Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................ 5
2.9 –Environmental Setting ............................................................................................... 6
2.10 –Project Description .................................................................................................... 6
2.11 –Required Approvals................................................................................................. 12
2.12 –Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required ................................................. 12
3 Determination .......................................................................................................................... 27
3.1 –Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................ 27
3.2 –Determination .......................................................................................................... 27
4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ...................................................................................... 29
4.1 –Aesthetics ............................................................................................................... 29
4.2 –Agriculture and Forest Resources ........................................................................... 33
4.3 –Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 35
4.4 –Biological Resources............................................................................................... 43
4.5 –Cultural Resources.................................................................................................. 58
4.6 –Energy ..................................................................................................................... 62
4.7 –Geology and Soils ................................................................................................... 64
4.8 –Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................... 69
4.9 –Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................................... 72
4.10 –Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................................. 76
4.11 –Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................... 80
4.12 –Mineral Resources .................................................................................................. 81
4.13 –Noise ....................................................................................................................... 82
4.14 –Population and Housing .......................................................................................... 93
4.15 –Public Services........................................................................................................ 94
4.16 –Recreation ............................................................................................................... 96
4.17 –Transportation ......................................................................................................... 97
4.18 –Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................ 99
4.19 –Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................ 101
4.20 –Wildfire .................................................................................................................. 105
4.21 –Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................................... 107
5 Mitigation Summary ............................................................................................................... 109
6 References ............................................................................................................................ 113
6.1 –List of Preparers .................................................................................................... 113
6.2 –Persons and Organizations Consulted .................................................................. 114
6.3 –Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 115
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) i
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 51
C.1.c
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Table 1 Surrounding Land Uses .............................................................................................................6
Table 2 Site Grading and Preparation Equipment ................................................................................10
Table 3 South Coast Air Quality Standards and Basin Attainment Status ............................................37
Table 4 Maximum Daily Criteria Air Pollutant Construction Emissions (lbs/day) .................................. 38
Table 5 Maximum Daily Criteria Air Pollutant Operational Emissions (lbs/day) ................................... 39
Table 6 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers ............................................................................. 47
Table 7 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................ 70
Table 8 Typical Outdoor and Indoor Noise Levels ................................................................................83
Table 9 Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ........................................................................ 88
Table 10 Predicted Sound Pressure Levels at Modeled Receptors ..................................................... 89
Table 11 Caltrans’ Vibration Criteria for Building Damage ................................................................... 90
Table 12 Caltrans’ Vibration Criteria for Human Response .................................................................. 91
Table 13 Groundborne Vibration Estimates .......................................................................................... 91
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map ........................................................................................................... 13
Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................... 15
Exhibit 3 Site Plan................................................................................................................................. 17
Exhibit 4 Project Renderings ................................................................................................................ 19
Exhibit 5 Project Elevations .................................................................................................................. 23
Exhibit 6 Energy Storage Equipment .................................................................................................... 25
Exhibit 7 Vegetation Communities ........................................................................................................ 49
Exhibit 8 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................... 53
Exhibit 9 Jurisdictional Delineation Results ..........................................................................................55
Appendices
Appendix A Air Quality Modeling Data
Appendix B Jurisdictional Waters Delineation and Biological Resources Assessment
Appendix C Historic Resources Evaluation Report
Appendix D Archaeological Resources Memorandum
Appendix E Geotechnical Investigation Report
Appendix F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Appendix G Hazards Analysis Final Report
Appendix H Preliminary Operational Noise Analysis Technical Memorandum
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
ii Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 52
C.1.c
1 Introduction
The City of Grand Terrace (Lead Agency) received an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP
20-03), Variance (V 21-01), Environmental Review (E 20-09), and Site and Architectural Review (SA
20-09) from Condor Energy Storage, LLC (Project Applicant) for construction and operation of a 200-
megawatt Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facility on a 9.86-acre site (APN# 1167-151-77-
0000) in the City of Grand Terrace, California. The approval of the application for the energy storage
facility constitutes a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California
Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et. seq.).
This Initial Study was prepared to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental
impacts that could result from the Project.
This report was prepared to comply with CEQA Guidelines § 15063, which sets forth the required
contents of an Initial Study. These include:
A description of the Project, including the location of the Project (See Section 2);
Identification of the environmental setting (See Section 2.9;
Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided
that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some
evidence to support the entries (See Section 4);
Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any (See Section 4);
Examination of whether the Project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other
applicable land use controls (See Section 4.11; and
The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial
Study (See Section 6.
1.1 – Purpose of CEQA
CEQA § 21000 of the California Public Resources Code provides as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares as follows:
a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a
matter of statewide concern.
b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to
the senses and intellect of man.
c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological
systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment of the natural
resources of the state.
d) The capacity of the environment is limited, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the
government of the state take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and
safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such
thresholds being reached.
e) Every citizen has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the
environment.
f) The interrelationship of policies and practices in the management of natural resources and waste
disposal requires systematic and concerted efforts by public and private interests to enhance
environmental quality and to control environmental pollution.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 1
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 53
C.1.c
Introduction
g) It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state government which regulate activities
of private individuals, corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the
environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing
environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every
Californian.
The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to:
h) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action
necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state.
i) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of
aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise.
j) Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man's activities, insure that fish and
wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations
representations of all plant and animal communities and examples of the major periods of
California history.
k) Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment, consistent with the provision of a decent
home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public
decisions.
l) Create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony to
fulfill the social and economic requirements of present and future generations.
m) Require governmental agencies at all levels to develop standards and procedures necessary to
protect environmental quality.
n) Require governmental agencies at all levels to consider qualitative factors as well as economic
and technical factors and long-term benefits and costs, in addition to short-term benefits and costs
and to consider alternatives to proposed actions affecting the environment.
A concise statement of legislative policy, with respect to public agency consideration of Projects for
some form of approval, is found in CEQA § 21002, quoted below:
The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not
approve Projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures
available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such Projects,
and that the procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in
systematically identifying both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible alternatives or
feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects. The
Legislature further finds and declares that in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions
make infeasible such Project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual Projects may be
approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof.
1.2 – Public Comments
Comments from all agencies and individuals are invited regarding the information contained in this
Initial Study. Such comments should explain any perceived deficiencies in the assessment of impacts,
identify the information that is purportedly lacking in the Initial Study or indicate where the information
may be found. All materials related to the preparation of this Initial Study are available for public
review. To request an appointment to review these materials, please contact:
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
2 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 54
C.1.c
Introduction
Steven Weiss, Planning and Development Services Director
Planning and Development Services
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
909-824-6621 Ext. 225
Following a 30-day period of circulation and review of the Initial Study, all comments will be
considered by the City of Grand Terrace prior to adoption. All materials related to the preparation of
this Initial Study are available for public review. To request an appointment to review these materials,
please contact the Planning and Development Services Department.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 3
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 55
C.1.c
Introduction
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 56
C.1.c
2 Project Description
2.1 – Project Title
Condor Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Facility (“Project”)
2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Grand Terrace
Planning and Development Services Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
909-824-6621
2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number
Steven A. Weiss, AICP, Planning and Development Services Director
909-824-6621 Ext. 225
2.4 – Project Location
The Project site is located at Assessor’s Parcel Number: 1167-151-77-0000, in the City of Grand
Terrace, San Bernardino County, California (See Exhibit 1, Regional Context Map). The Project site is
comprised of a single undeveloped parcel totaling approximately 9.86 acres generally located at the
northwest corner of Main Street and Taylor Street (See Exhibit 2, Project Vicinity Map).
Latitude 34° 01’ 13.35” North, Longitude 117° 19’ 56.26” West
APN 1167-15-1-77-0000
2.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address
Condor Energy Storage, LLC
th
452 Fifth Avenue, 29 Floor
New York, New York 10018
2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation
Industrial
2.7 – Zoning District
M2 - Industrial
2.8 – Surrounding Land Uses
The Project site is bound by Main Street to the south, Taylor Street to the east, the BNSF/Metrolink
Inland Empire railroad line to the west, and Southern California Edison’s (SCE) Highgrove Substation
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
to the north. To the south of the Project site, on the opposite side of Main Street, are light industrial
uses in the unincorporated neighborhood of Highgrove. To the east of the Project site, on the opposite
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 5
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 57
C.1.c
Project Description
side of Taylor Street, is Grand Terrace High School, Colton Joint Unified School District. To the west
of the Project site, on the opposite side of the railroad tracks, is a recycling center. Surrounding uses
and land use designations are summarized in Table 1 (Surrounding Land Uses).
Table 1
Surrounding Land Uses
General Plan
Direction Zoning District Existing Land Use
Designation
Project Site Industrial M2-IndustrialVacant
Highgrove Substation
North Industrial M2-Industrial
SCE/Riverside Canal Power Co.
Light Industrial Light Industrial
SouthIndustrial/Truck Trailer Storage
(Highgrove)(Highgrove)
Public; General MR - Restricted
EastGrand Terrace High School
CommercialManufacturing
WestIndustrial M2-IndustrialSafe Way Recycling
2.9 – Environmental Setting
The Project site is currently mostly vacant and undeveloped with the exception of an approximately
4,000- square foot building at the southeast corner of the site that was formerly used as part of the
Highgrove Substation to the north. However, this building is no longer in use. The northeastern corner
of the Project site was previously developed with industrial uses. The remainder of the Project site
historically functioned as Cage Park and contains ornamental tree species consistent with this use. A
concrete drainage extends from the southeast to the central portion of the site. A mixed ornamental
and riparian woodland patch lies in the northwestern corner. There is an ephemeral stream extending
from the eastern boundary of the Project site to connect with an unnamed tributary of the Santa Ana
River to the west. The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately
940 to 951 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), and slopes from southeast to northwest.
2.10 – Project Description
The Project will consist of lithium-ion energy batteries installed on racks, inverters, switchgear, and
other associated equipment to directly interconnect into the Southern California Edison (SCE)
Highgrove Substation (point of interconnection) located immediately adjacent to the north of the
Project site (See Exhibit 3, Site Plan). The site immediately adjacent to the north of the Project site is
also the former location of the Highgrove Steam Plant, which was constructed in 1951 and mostly
deconstructed by the year 2010 (See Exhibit 4 Project Renderings). Only a few structures remain
from the original Highgrove Steam Plant and act to serve the existing Highgrove Substation. The
proposed Project will interconnect with the Highgrove Substation via an enclosed transformer
substation area located at the north-central portion of the Project site. The 0.42-acre enclosed
transformer substation area includes a 34.5 kV/115kV main power transformer, a substation control
enclosure, a switch and gear station, a 50-foot tall static mast for lightning, and a 40-foot tall overhead
interconnection tower (See Exhibit 5, Project Elevations). Because the static mast and overhead
interconnection tower will exceed the maximum allowable height of thirty-five (35) for the M-2 zone,
the Project includes a Variance (V 21-01). The proposed lithium-ion batteries will be installed in
purpose-built containers, which will be designed for aesthetic compatibility with the surrounding area
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
(See Exhibit 6, Energy Storage Equipment). The structures will have battery storage racks separated
6 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 58
C.1.c
Project Description
with relay and communications systems for automated monitoring and managing of the batteries to
ensure design performance. Batteries operate with direct current (DC) electricity that must be
converted to alternating current (AC) for compatibility with the existing electric grid. Power inverters to
convert between AC and DC will be located outside the purpose-built containers, along with
transformers to step up the voltage. The proposed facility will provide a service by receiving energy
(charging) from the transmission system via the Highgrove Substation, storing energy, and then later
delivering energy (discharging) back to the point of interconnection. The facility is intended to operate
year-round and will be available to receive or deliver energy 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
There is an approximately 4,000-square foot corrugated metal building located in the southeastern
portion of the Project site that would be demolished in order to develop the proposed Project. The
proposed Project includes the following components:
Battery Energy Storage System Facility
The energy storage batteries will be housed in containers or purpose-built cabinets/cubes. The BESS
facility will be designed and installed in conformance with the nationally recognized National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) 855 Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage
Systems, along with all applicable state and County fire protection requirements. The facility will not
be staffed, with remote operational control and periodic inspections and maintenance performed, as
necessary.
Batteries and Racks
The lithium-ion batteries will be housed in racks similar to common computer server racks. The racks
are typically made of aluminum, but sometimes may be composed of steel. The proposed facility will
use a lithium-ion technology that has a long lifespan.
Fire Protection and Fire Suppression Features
The Applicant intends to use batteries that are UL certified and include built-in fail-safes and multi-
layered fire protection features designed to prevent thermal runaway and the spread of fire. A Project
fire protection plan and fire suppression plan will be established to ensure fire safety on the Project
site.
Highgrove Substation Interconnection
The BESS facility will store energy and will be interconnected to the Highgrove Substation located
immediately adjacent to the northwestern project limits. The interconnection will be an overhead
connection to the Highgrove Substation. An additional bay and related interconnection facilities similar
to what is currently constructed will likely be constructed within the Highgrove Substation. The Project
will include the SCE Interconnection Facility improvements listed below at the Highgrove Substation.
- New facilities for a new 115 kV switchrack position to include the following: one (1) 115 kV
dead-end structure; three (3) 115 kV voltage transformers with steel pedestal support
structures; and, three (3) 115 kV line drops.
- Two (2) line current differential relays, to be specified during final engineering.
- Telecommunication infrastructure, including the following: lightwave, channel banks, and
associated equipment; supporting line protection and the TRU requirements for
interconnection; fiber optic cable, including conduit and vaults to extend telecommunications
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
into the communication room.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 7
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 59
C.1.c
Project Description
- Metering facilities to meter the charging demand at the generating facility.
The Project will also include the following Distribution Upgrades:
a. Highgrove Substation
i. Install one (1) 115 kV line position which includes the following equipment:
1. Two (2) 115 kV circuit breakers
2. One (1) 115 kV group operated disconnect switch with grounding attachment
3. Three (3) 115 kV group operated disconnect switches
b. Distributed Energy Resource Management System (DERMS).
i. Add Project to DERMS
Outdoor Electrical Equipment
Switchgear and additionally required electrical equipment would be installed. Depending on the
battery manufacturer, inverters could be located either inside or outside the BESS structures.
Underground wires and cabling would run from the battery cable collection box (inside the structure)
to a concrete pad housing the electrical equipment. All outside electrical equipment would be housed
in the appropriate National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) rated enclosures. All outside
electrical cabling would be run underground.
Inverters
Inverters will be unattended, stand-alone units that operate in all conditions. They operate in both a
charge mode and a discharge mode. They are UL listed for bi-directional use and are monitored and
controlled remotely. There would be on-site disconnects in the case of an emergency or unscheduled
maintenance. In the case of any grid disturbance on the SCE side, the inverters would not operate
until they are remotely turned back on or the grid instability is stabilized for a set length of time. In the
discharge mode, they are turned on remotely and controlled by internal circuitry and power control
software at the facility. They are designed to last more than 30 years.
Telecommunications Facilities
The proposed Project would also require telecommunication facilities to meet the communication
requirements for interconnecting with the SCE facilities and to support remote Project operations
monitoring. To provide for communication with SCE facilities, a fiber-optic cable would be placed
along the line connecting the Project site generation step-up (GSU) transformer with the SCE point of
interconnection. Utility interconnection regulations require the installation of a second, separate,
redundant fiber-optic cable. The redundant fiber-optic cable would also be installed within the Project
footprint.
The Project would use local exchange carrier services for telecommunication to support remote
monitoring requirements. The Project would connect to telecommunication fiber-optic lines owned and
managed by local telecommunication providers. The cabinet holding the connection equipment would
have a base of approximately 4 feet by 2 feet and would be approximately 5 feet in height. From the
point of demarcation, a fiber-optic cable would be installed within the Project footprint to connect the
cabinet to the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) equipment.
The SCADA system is critical to the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and SCE utility
interconnection, and for the proper operation and maintenance of the Project. The SCADA system
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
uses proprietary software; a fiber-optic transmission system; a telephone, radio, and/or microwave
8 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 60
C.1.c
Project Description
communication network; and other means of communication such as radio links and phase loop
communication systems. The SCADA system functions as a remote start, stop, reset, and tag out for
the facility, thus minimizing the labor and site diagnostic information generated from the panels. The
SCADA system would also control the substations, allowing for fully centralized operation of the
project to meet all CAISO and utility interconnection requirements.
Site Access and Security
The Project would be accessed directly from Main Street or Taylor Road. No new roads would be
required to provide access to the Project site. The Project will have its main entrance along Main
Street. Decorative block walls would be installed along the southern and eastern site boundaries and
wrought iron fencing would be installed along the western and northern site boundaries for safety and
security purposes. All wall and fencing installation requirements would be evaluated, and the best-fit
scenario would be incorporated on the Project site based on the City’s final determination. The
decorative block wall and fencing would be approximately 9 feet tall and would remain for the life of
the Project. Permanent motion-sensitive, directional security lights would be installed to provide
adequate illumination around the substation areas and points of ingress/egress. All lighting would be
shielded and directed downward to minimize the potential for glare or spillover onto adjacent
properties.
Construction Schedule and Workforce
The construction of the proposed Project will last between 8 to 10 months. Construction activities for
the proposed Project generally fall into three main categories: (1) site preparation; (2) system
installation; and (3) testing, commissioning, and cleanup. Construction would primarily occur during
daylight hours, Monday through Friday, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., as required to meet the
construction schedule. Any construction work performed outside the normal work schedule would be
coordinated with the appropriate agencies and would conform to City regulations.
The on-site construction workforce is expected to peak at up to 75 individuals; however, the average
daily workforce is expected to be approximately 50 construction, supervisory, support, and
construction management personnel on site during construction. It is anticipated that the construction
workforce would commute to the site each day from local communities and report to the designated
construction staging yards prior to the beginning of each workday. Construction staff not drawn from
the local labor pool would stay in local hotels in Riverside, San Bernardino, or other local
communities. Deliveries of equipment and materials would generate an estimated five round-trips per
day during peak construction periods.
Site Grading and Earthwork
Construction activities are expected to include excavation and grading of the Project site. Site
preparation and construction would occur in accordance with all federal, state, and City zoning codes
and requirements. Noise-generating construction activities would be limited to Monday through Friday,
between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The site is located in a primarily industrial area, with residential
neighborhoods located across Main Street approximately 0.10 miles (260 feet) southeast and
southwest of the Project site. The contractor would conduct construction activities in such a manner
that the maximum noise levels at the affected buildings would not exceed established noise levels. It
is estimated that site grading and preparation would require the equipment listed in Table 2 (Site
Grading and Preparation Equipment).
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 9
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 61
C.1.c
Project Description
Table 2
Site Grading and Preparation Equipment
Equipment Type Quantity
Bulldozer (e.g., CAT D7) 1
Grader (e.g., CAT D7) 1
Scraper (15-30 cubic yard) 2
Water Truck (3,000-5,000 gallon) 1
Self-Propelled Compactor 1
Dump Truck 1
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe (e.g., Case 590) 1
Bobcat 1
Source: Dudek, October 2020.
All applicable local, state, and federal requirements and best management practices (BMPs) would be
incorporated into the construction activities for the Project site. Beginning work on the Project site
would involve preparing the land for installation of the BESS-related infrastructure, access driveways,
and temporary construction staging areas. The construction contractor would be required to
incorporate BMPs consistent with the City zoning ordinance and with guidelines provided in the
California Stormwater Quality Association’s Construction Best Management PracticeHandbook
(CASQA 2019), as well as a soil erosion and sedimentation control plan to reduce potential impacts
related to construction of the proposed Project. Prior to initial construction mobilization, pre-
construction surveys would be performed, and sediment and erosion controls would be installed in
accordance with City and state guidelines. Stabilized construction entrances and exits would be
installed at driveways to reduce tracking of sediment onto adjacent public roadways.
Site preparation would be consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
rules for dust control. Site preparation would involve the removal and proper disposal of existing
vegetation and debris that would unduly interfere with Project construction or the health and safety of
on-site personnel. Dust-minimizing techniques would be employed, such as maintaining natural
vegetation where possible, using a mow-and-roll vegetation clearance strategy, placement of wind
control fencing, application of water, and application of dust suppressants. Conventional grading
would be performed throughout the Project site but minimized to the maximum extent possible to
reduce unnecessary soil movement that may result in dust. Earthworks scrapers, excavators, dozers,
water trucks, paddlewheels, haul vehicles, and graders may all be used to perform grading. Land-
leveling equipment, such as a smooth steel drum roller, would be used to even the surface of the
ground and to compact the upper layer of soil to a value recommended by a geotechnical engineer for
structural support. Soil movement from grading would be balanced on the site, and no import or
export of soils would occur.
Trenching would be required for placement of underground electrical and communication lines, and
may include the use of trenchers, backhoes, excavators, haul vehicles, compaction equipment, and
water trucks. After preparation of the site, the pads for structures, equipment enclosures, and
equipment vaults would be prepared per geotechnical engineer recommendations. The switchyard
areas would have a grounding grid installed and would be covered with aggregate surfacing for safe
operation. During this work, there would be multiple crews working on the site with various equipment
and vehicles, including special vehicles for transporting the batteries and other equipment. As the
BESS structures are constructed, the electrical collection and communication systems would be
installed. The wiring would connect to the appropriate electrical and communication terminations and
the circuits would be checked and commissioned prior to operation.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
10 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 62
C.1.c
Project Description
Stormwater Drainage
The Project will include two separate stormwater detention ponds, one in the north-central portion of
the site to the east of the riparian wetland area, and the second in the west-central portion of the site
to the south of the riparian wetland area. Together these two detention ponds will comprise
approximately 0.17 acres of the site. Once the proposed Project is constructed approximately 48
percent of the site will be comprised of impervious surfaces. During operation stormwater will be
collected on-site and diverted to one of the two proposed stormwater detention ponds where it will be
treated before being discharged into the municipal storm drain system in Main Street.
Operations and Maintenance Activities
Typical operations and maintenance activities that would occur on the project site during operation
include, but are not limited to, liaison and remote monitoring, administration and reporting, semi-
annual and annual services, remote operations of inverters, site security and management, and
additional communication protocols, as well as repair and maintenance of the BESS facility, electrical
transmission lines, and other Project facilities. The Project is expected to charge and discharge daily,
upon SCE grid demand and would be remotely operated in conjunction with SCE’s sub-transmission
system demands. It is anticipated that primary charging would take place during the peakof the day,
when there is excess solar capacity, and would be discharged in the evening, when the sun is going
down. The electrical equipment; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; fire protection systems; and
security would be automated and monitored remotely. The site would be unoccupied and remotely
operated but visited periodically for equipment inspections, monitoring and testing, security,
landscaping, and maintenance as needed. Periodically, batteries and various components would be
replaced or renewed to ensure optimal operation. Stormwater would be treated in accordance with
County requirements. Outdoor equipment would be sealed or enclosed and would not affect
stormwater quality.
Solid and Nonhazardous Waste
The Project would produce a small amount of waste associated with maintenance activities, which
could include broken and rusted metal, defective or malfunctioning modules, electrical materials,
empty containers, and other miscellaneous solid waste, including the typical refuse generated by
workers. Most of these materials would be collected and delivered back to the manufacturer or to
recyclers. Non-recyclable waste would be placed in covered dumpsters and removed on a regular
basis by a certified waste-handling contractor for disposal at a Class III landfill.
Hazardous Materials
Limited amounts of hazardous materials would be stored or used on the site during operations,
including diesel fuel, gasoline, and motor oil for vehicles; mineral oil to be sealed within the
transformers; and lead-acid-based and/or lithium-ion batteries for emergency backup. Appropriate
spill containment and cleanup kits would be maintained during operation of the Project. A spill
prevention control and countermeasures plan would be developed for site operations.
Hazardous Waste
Fuels and lubricants used in operations would be subject to the spill prevention control and
countermeasures plan to be prepared for the proposed project. Solid waste, if generated during
operations, would be subject to the material disposal and solid waste management plan to be
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
prepared for the proposed Project.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 11
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 63
C.1.c
Project Description
Security and Lighting
The proposed Project would be fenced to help prevent access by the public. Gates would be installed
at the road entrance(s). Limiting access to the Project site is necessary both to ensure the safety of
the public and to protect the equipment from potential theft and vandalism. The Project’s lighting
system would provide operations and maintenance personnel with illumination for both normal and
emergency conditions. Lighting would be designed to provide the minimum illumination needed to
achieve safety and security objectives. Additionally, lighting would be directed downward and shielded
to focus illumination on the desired areas only and to minimize light trespass.
Decommissioning
At the end of the proposed Project’s operational term, the Applicant may determine that the Project
site should be decommissioned and deconstructed, or it may seek an extension of its conditional use
permit. The proposed Projectwould include BMPs to ensure the collection and recycling of batteries
and to avoid the potential for batteries to be disposed of as municipal waste. All decommissioning and
restoration activities would adhere to the requirements of the appropriate governing authorities and
would be in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and City regulations. Following the expiration
of a power purchase agreement for the proposed Project, the Applicant may, at its discretion, choose
to enter into subsequent power purchase agreements or to decommission and remove the facility and
its components. The Project site could then be converted to other uses in accordance with the
applicable land use regulations in effect at that time.
It is anticipated that during Project decommissioning, Project structures would be removed from the
ground on the Project site. Aboveground equipment that would be removed includes inverters,
transformers, electrical wiring, and equipment on the inverter pads. Equipment would be de-energized
prior to removal, salvaged (where possible), placed in appropriate shipping containers, and secured in
a truck transport trailer for shipment off site to be recycled or disposed of at an appropriately licensed
disposal facility. Site infrastructure would be removed, including the fences and the concrete pads that
may support the inverters, transformers, and related equipment. The demolition debris and removed
equipment may be cut or dismantled into pieces that can be safely lifted or carried with the equipment
being used. The fencing and gates would be removed, and all materials would be recycled to the
extent feasible. The area would be thoroughly cleaned, and all debris would be removed. A collection
and recycling program would be executed to promote recycling of project components and minimize
disposal in landfills.
2.11 – Required Approvals
The Project will require the following approvals:
Conditional Use Permit (CUP 20-03)
Variance (V 21-01) for Height Exceedance
Environmental Review (E 20-09)
Site and Architectural Review (SA 20-09)
2.12 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required
None.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
12 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 64
C.1.c
Exhibit 1
Regional Context Map
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 13
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 65
C.1.c
Project Description
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
14 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 66
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 2
Project Vicinity Map
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 15
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 67
C.1.c
Project Description
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
16 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 68
C.1.c
Exhibit 3
Site Plan
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 17
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 69
C.1.c
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 70
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 4
Project Renderings
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 19
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 71
C.1.c
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 72
C.1.c
Project Description
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 21
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 73
C.1.c
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 74
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 5
Project Elevations
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 23
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 75
C.1.c
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01,
Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 76
C.1.c
Exhibit 6
Energy Storage Equipment
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 25
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 77
C.1.c
Project Description
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
26 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 78
C.1.c
3 Determination
3.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at
least one impact that is a ‘Potentially Significant Impact’ as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
AestheticsAgriculture ResourcesAir Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous
Geology /Soils
Emissions Materials
Hydrology / Water
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Quality
NoisePopulation / Housing Public Services
Tribal Cultural
RecreationTransportation/Traffic
Resources
Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings of
Wildfire
SystemsSignificance
3.2 – Determination
I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by
the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the Project MAY have a ‘potentially significant impact’ or ‘potentially significant unless
mitigated’ impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant
to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that
are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required.
Name: Steven A. Weiss, AICP Date
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Planning and Development Services Director
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 27
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 79
C.1.c
Project Description
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
28 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 80
C.1.c
4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.1 – Aesthetics
Would the Project:
Less Than
PotentiallyLess Than
Significant with No
SignificantSignificant
MitigationImpact
Impact Impact
Incorporated
a) Have a substantial adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within view from a state
scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of
public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point).
If the project is in an urbanized
area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
a)No Impact.Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two ways. First, a structure may be
constructed that blocks the view of a vista. Second, the vista itself may be altered (i.e., development
on a scenic hillside). According to the General Plan Program EIR, The City is characterized by a
mixture of natural and urban landforms. The natural environment is made up of diverse landforms,
rock outcrops, plants and animal resources, natural colors and hues and panoramic public views of
1
the horizon, and of the surrounding foothills and mountain ranges. Scenic views of nearby hills and of
the valley to the north of the City are prominent from a number of locations within the City. Several
residential communities have been constructed and oriented to take advantage of the views provided
by these natural landforms. The major scenic resource in the planning area is Blue Mountain on the
eastern boundary of the City. Blue Mountain has become the symbol of the City providing a scenic
backdrop for much of the City. Scenic views are offered to residences nestled on the side of Blue
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Mountain including views of the San Bernardino Mountains to the north. Grand Terrace Municipal
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 29
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 81
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Code Chapter 18.40.050 (Site Development Standards for the M2 - Industrial District) restricts
developments in the M2 Zone to a structure height limit of thirty-five (35) feet.
The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 942 to 952 feet
above mean sea level (AMSL). The Project is located within an urbanized area, visually dominated by
industrial uses, commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, and surface streets. The site is
located in close proximity to Interstate 215 (I-215) and is approximately 1.5 miles west of the foothills
of Blue Mountain. The site is not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista as
2
shown in the California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Views of Blue Mountain from the Project
site are partially obstructed by existing development and landscaping. The site is zoned M2-Industrial
and is designated as Industrial in the City’s General Plan, meaning the site is not considered open
space. In addition, the site is not located in an area designated as Hillside Residential. The Project
would not block views of the Blue Mountains. Therefore, development of the proposed Project and
accessory landscaping elements would have no effect on a scenic vista.
b) No Impact.As shown in response 4.1.a above, the Project is not adjacent to or near a
designated state scenic highway or eligible state scenic highway as identified on the California
Scenic Highway Mapping System. The Project is in an urbanized area characterized by industrial
uses, commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, and surface street features. The site
contains no rock outcroppings or historically significant buildings (see Section 4.5 Cultural
Resources) that would constitute a scenic resource. The site contains several small ornamental trees
that will be removed as part of Project development. However, the City’s Tree Removal Ordinance
(Municipal Code Section 12.28.100: Removal) only applies to the removal or injury of trees in city
streets and parkways. Therefore, no impact to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway
or a local scenic road would occur.
c) Less than Significant Impact.Development of the Project could result in a significant impact if
it resulted in substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings, or if it would conflict with applicable zoning or other regulations governing scenic
quality. Degradation of visual character or quality is defined by substantial changes to the existing site
appearance through construction of structures such that they are poorly designed or conflict with the
site’s existing surroundings. Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage points. The Project is located in an urbanized area and is surrounded by industrial uses,
commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, and surface street features. Construction of the
BESS facility would result in short-term impacts to the existing visual character and quality of the site.
Construction activities would require the use of equipment and storage of materials within the Project
site. However, construction activities are temporary and would not result in any permanent visual
impact to the site or surrounding area. There is an existing structure on the southeast corner of the
site that is owned by SCE that will be demolished as part of Project development. However,
demolition activities would be temporary and would not permanently degrade the visual character or
quality of the site or its surroundings. Project development would involve demolition, site grading and
excavation of the site, development of the energy storage facilities and associated infrastructure, and
site access improvements.
As discussed in Sections 4.1.a and 4.1.b above, the Project would not have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista and is not located within a State scenic highway. The Project site is zoned M2-
Industrial, which has an allowable maximum structure height of 35 feet. The site is ideally suited for an
energy utility project that requires interconnection to the Highgrove Substation. However,
interconnecting to the existing substation requires an overhead power line, and appurtenant structures
to support these lines. Two support structures are proposed: one 50 feet in height, and one 40 feet in
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
height. These heights are required to meet safety clearance requirements as detailed in the California
30 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 82
C.1.c
Project Description
3
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) General Order 95 (GO-95), Rule No. 37, Table 1, Case No. 3.
With the 30-foot minimum requirement of GO-95, wire sagging and clearances between energized
conductors and static wires, having structures less than 35 feet is not feasible. The strict application of
the zoning ordinance would limit the height of all structures to 35 feet. This would preclude the ability
to provide overhead power lines and structures meeting GO-95 safety clearance requirements that
would allow an interconnection to the adjacent Highgrove substation. In addition, such overhead
power lines and support structures exceeding 35 feet in height currently exist on and around the
Highgrove Substation for the purposes of interconnecting. Several overhead power lines and support
structures exceeding 35 feet in height exist in the vicinity of, and interconnect to Highgrove
Substation.
Because the proposed Project includes structures with heights that exceed the allowable height of 35
feet within the M-2 zone, the Project Applicant has submitted an application for a Variance for the
height exceedance. Allowing the proposed interconnection structures would be consistent with the
allowance of existing structures in the Project vicinity. The Project site is designated as M-2
(Industrial) per the City’s zoning map. Per the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (City of Grand
Terrace 2010), the parcel is designated as Industrial Land Use. The Project would be considered:
“Public Utilities and Facilities” which is allowed as a Conditionally Permitted Use per the City Zoning
code (GTMC 18.40.030). The proposed energy facility is requesting the Variance for the height
restrictions for several structures that would electrically connect the proposed facility to the adjacent
Highgrove Substation. The height of these structures is necessary to provide necessary safety
clearances as identified in GO-95.
Development of the Project would alter the existing visual character of the site; however, the proposed
use would be comparable with industrial developments in the Project area. The inclusion of overhead
power lines and support structures exceeding 35 feet in height would not substantially degrade the
existing visual character of the site because other such structures already exist in the Project vicinity.
The surrounding area is not visually distinct and does not portray a particular architectural theme or
aesthetic. Additionally, the site is currently undeveloped and has fallen into disuse. Therefore, the
Project would improve the visual character and quality of the site and reflect an improvement to its
surroundings by representing an upgrade to an existing use. Finally, with issuance of the Variance,
the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning or regulations governing scenic quality. For the
reasons stated above, the Project would have less than significant impacts on the visual character of
the site and the surroundings.
d) Less than Significant Impact. Excessive or inappropriately directed lighting can adversely
impact night-time views by reducing the ability to see the night sky and stars. Glare can be caused
from unshielded or misdirected lighting sources. Reflective surfaces (i.e., polished metal) can also
cause glare. Impacts associated with glare range from simple nuisance to potentially dangerous
situations (i.e., if glare is directed into the eyes of motorists). Sources of daytime glare are typically
concentrated in commercial areas and are often associated with retail uses. Glare results from
development and associated parking areas that contain reflective materials such as hi-efficiency
window glass, highly polished surfaces, and expanses of pavement.
There are lighting sources adjacent to the site, including free-standing street lights, light fixtures on
buildings, and pole-mounted lights. The proposed development includes exterior lighting for security,
and would operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Light spillover would be avoided by requiring
that lighting be designed to project downward and prohibiting illumination on adjacent property that
exceeds three foot-candles, whether the illumination is direct or indirect light from the source, as
measured from the property line, per the requirements of Municipal Code Section 18.74.080
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
(Illumination). Glare impacts will be reduced to less than significant through adherence to San
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 31
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 83
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Bernardino County Development Code Chapter 83.07 (Glare and Outdoor Lighting). Compliance with
the Municipal and County Code standards for lighting and glare during construction and operation of
the proposed industrial development would ensure that lighting and glare impacts would be less than
significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
32 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 84
C.1.c
Project Description
4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the
state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the
Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project:
Potentially
Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104 (g))?
d) Result in loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
a)No Impact. The Project would be located in a fully developed, urbanized area that does not
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
contain agriculture or forest uses. The Map of Important Farmland in California (2016) prepared by the
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 33
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 85
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Department of Conservation identifies the Project site as Urban and Built-Up Land and does not
identify the Project site as being Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
4
Importance. Therefore, there would be no conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and
Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use as a result of construction of the
proposed convenience market and fueling station. No impact would occur.
5
b)No Impact. No Williamson Act contracts are active for the Project site. Therefore, there would be
no conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would
occur.
c)No Impact. Public Resources Code § 12220(g) identifies forest land as land that can support 10-
percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that
allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife,
biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. The Project site and surrounding
properties are not currently being managed or used for forest land as identified in Public Resources
Code § 12220(g). The Project site has already been disturbed by previous development and is
surrounded by industrial, commercial, residential, and institutional uses as well as surface street
features. Therefore, development of the Project would have no impact to any timberland zoning.
d)No Impact. The Project site is partially developed, disturbed land with limited non-native
vegetation; thus, there would be no loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non-forest use as
a result of this Project. No impact would occur.
e) No Impact. The Project site is a partially developed site within an urban environment. The Project
is surrounded by industrial uses, commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, and surface
streets. None of the surrounding sites contains existing forest uses. Development of the energy
storage facility would not change the existing environment in a manner that would result in the
conversion of forestland to a non-forest use. No impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
34 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 86
C.1.c
Project Description
4.3 – Air Quality
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
Project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors ) adversely
affecting a substantial number of
people?
a)Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if the proposed project conflicts
with or obstructs implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2016 Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP). Conflicts and obstructions that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet
attainment deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable air
quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South
Coast Air Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or
severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and (2) is consistent with the
1
growth assumptions in the AQMP. A consistency review is presented below:
1) Is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP; and
2) Does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a
new one.
Consistency Criterion 1 refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the
2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP was designed to achieve attainment for all criteria air pollutants within
the Basin while still accommodating growth in the region. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
1
South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 1993.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 35
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 87
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth
is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. The proposed Project would not generate
any long-term employment or support any new population. Once operational, the proposed energy
storage facility will be operated remotely and will only require intermittent inspections and
maintenance. In addition, the Project does not include any housing. Therefore, the proposed Project
would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP.
Consistency Criterion 2 refers to the CAAQS. In developing its CEQA significance thresholds, the
SCAQMD considered the emission levels at which a project’s individual emissions would be
cumulatively considerable. As described below in under response 4.3.b), the proposed Project would
not generate construction or operational emissions in excess of SCAQMD regional CEQA thresholds.
For the reasons described above, the proposed Project would not conflict with the SCAQMD 2016
AQMP. Impacts will be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact. A project may have a significant impact if project-related
emissions would exceed federal, state, or regional standards or thresholds, or if project-related
emissions would substantially contribute to existing or project air quality violations. The Project is
located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), where efforts to attain state and federal air quality
standards are governed by the SCAQMD. Both the State of California and the federal government
have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants (known
ascriteria pollutants). These pollutants include ozone (O), CO, nitrogen dioxide (NO), sulfur dioxide
32
(SO), inhalable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM), fine particulate matter
210
with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM), and lead (Pb). The state has also established ambient
2.5
air quality standards (AAQS) for additional pollutants. The AAQS are designed to protect the health
and welfare of the populace within a reasonable margin of safety. Where the state and federal
standards differ, California AAQS (CAAQS) are more stringent than the national AAQS (NAAQS).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), California Air Resources Board (CARB), and
the SCAQMD assess the air quality of an area by measuring and monitoring the amount of pollutants
in the ambient air and comparing pollutant levels against NAAQS and CAAQS. Based on these
comparisons, regions are classified into one of the following categories:
Attainment. A region is “in attainment” if monitoring shows ambient concentrations of a specific
pollutant are less than or equal to NAAQS or CAAQS. In addition, an area that has been re-
designated from nonattainment to attainment is classified as a “maintenance area” for 10 years to
ensure that the air quality improvements are sustained.
Nonattainment. If the NAAQS or CAAQS are exceeded for a pollutant, the region is designated as
nonattainment for that pollutant. It is important to note that some NAAQS and CAAQS require multiple
exceedances of the standard in order for a region to be classified as nonattainment. Federal and state
laws require nonattainment areas to develop strategies, plans, and control measures to reduce
pollutant concentrations to levels that meet, or attain, standards.
Unclassified. An area is unclassified if the ambient air monitoring data are incomplete and do not
support a designation of attainment or nonattainment. Air pollution levels are measured at monitoring
stations located throughout the air basin.
Table 3, South Coast Air Quality Standards and Basin Attainment Status, summarizes the attainment
67
status in the Basin for the criteria pollutants.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
36 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 88
C.1.c
Project Description
Table 3
South Coast Air Quality Standards and Basin Attainment Status
(A)(A)
California StandardsNational Standards
Averaging
Pollutant
Attainment Attainment
(B)
(C)(C)
Time
StandardStandard
(D)(D)
StatusStatus
3
1-Hour (1979) -- -- 240 µg/m Nonattainment
3
1-Hour (Current) 180 µg/m Nonattainment -- --
3
Ozone 8-Hour (1997) ---- 160 µg/m Nonattainment
3
8-Hour (2008) ---- 147 µg/m Nonattainment
33
8-Hour (Current) 137 µg/m Nonattainment 137 µg/m Pending
33
Nonattainment 150 µg/m Attainment
24-Hour 50 µg/m
PM
10
3
Annual Average 20 µg/m Nonattainment -- --
3
24-Hour -- -- 35 µg/m Nonattainment
Annual Average
3
Nonattainment
-- -- 15 µg/m
PM(1997)
2.5
Annual Average
33
12 µg/m Nonattainment 12 µg/m Nonattainment
(Current)
33
1-Hour 23,000 µg/m Attainment 40,000 µg/m Attainment
Carbon
33
Monoxide
8-Hour 10,000 µg/m Attainment 10,000 µg/m Attainment
Unclassifiable/
33
1-Hour 339 µg/m Attainment 188 µg/m
Nitrogen
Attainment
Dioxide
33
Annual Average 57 µg/m Attainment 100 µg/m Attainment
33
1-Hour 655 µg/m Attainment 196 µg/m Attainment
Unclassifiable/
33
Sulfur24-Hour 105 µg/m Attainment 367 µg/m
Attainment
Dioxide
Unclassifiable/
3
Annual Average -- --79 µg/m
Attainment
Nonattainment
3
Lead 3-Months Rolling -- -- 0.15 µg/m
(Partial)
Hydrogen
3
Attainment --
1-Hour 42 µg/m
Sulfide
3
Sulfates 24-Hour 25 µg/m Attainment --
Vinyl
3
24-Hour 26 µg/m Attainment --
Chloride
Source: CARB 2016, SCAQMD 2016, modified by MIG.
(A) This table summarizes the CAAQS and NAAQS and the Basin’s attainments status. This table does not prevent
comprehensive information regarding the CAAQS and NAAQS. Each CAAQS and NAAQS has its own averaging time,
standard unit of measurement, measurement method, and statistical test for determining if a specific standard has been
exceeded. Standards are not presented for visibility reducing particles, which are not concentration-based. The Basin is
unclassified for visibility reducing particles.
(B) Ambient air standards have changed over time. This table presents information on the standards previously used by the U.S.
EPA for which the Basin does not meet attainment.
3
(C) All standards are shown in terms of micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m) rounded to the nearest whole number for
3
comparison purposes (with the exception of lead, which has a standard less than 1 µg/m). The actual CAAQS and NAAQS
standards specify units for each pollutant measurement.
A= Attainment, N= Nonattainment, U=Unclassifiable.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 37
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 89
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
The Project would generate both short-term construction emissions and long-term operational
emissions. Project emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod) (see Appendix A). CalEEMod defaults have generally been used as construction inputs
into the model. CalEEMod default settings for Project trip generation were also utilized. The
methodology for calculating emissions is included in the CalEEMod User Guide, freely available at
http://www.caleemod.com. As described in more detail below, the Project would not generate short-
term or long-term emissions that exceed SCAQMD-recommended pollutant thresholds.
Construction Emissions
Short-term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during demolition, construction, and architectural
coating activities. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and
disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). The Project’s maximum daily unmitigated construction
emissions are shown in Table 4, Maximum Daily Criteria Pollutant Construction Emissions (lbs/day).
The construction emission estimates incorporate measures to control and reduce fugitive dust as
required by SCAQMD Rule 403.
Table 4
Maximum Daily Criteria Air Pollutant Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
Source ROGNOCOSOPMPM
X2102.5
Summer
2021 4.21 44.16 27.49 0.06 4.99 3.14
Winter
2021 4.21 44.17 27.12 0.06 4.99 3.14
Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Potentially Significant? No No No No No No
Source: MIG, 2021 (See Appendix A).
As shown in Table 4, the Project’s maximum daily criteria air pollutant emissions during construction
would be below the SCAQMD’s regional pollutant thresholds for all pollutants. Therefore, construction
of the Project would not generate construction-related criteria air pollutant emissions that exceed
SCAQMD regional CEQA thresholds. Impacts will be less than significant.
Operational Emissions
Long-term criteria air pollutant emissions will result from operation of the proposed Project; however,
these emissions will be negligible. Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions,
energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions will result from use of a
diesel generator and periodic maintenance vehicle trips. Operational emissions will not result from
automobile, truck, or other vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the Project, as the
proposed Project does not constitute such a use and will not include such vehicle trips. Area source
emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape
maintenance equipment, use of consumer products such as cleaning products, and periodic
repainting of the proposed project. Area source emissions from landscape equipment and consumer
cleaning products will not occur as a result of the proposed Project; however, periodic cleaning and
repainting is anticipated. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas;
however, the proposed project will not utilize natural gas and energy demand is anticipated to be
negligible. Emissions from area sources were estimated using CalEEMod defaults. Daily vehicle trips
are not associated with the proposed project. The Project’s maximum daily unmitigated operational
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
emissions are shown in Table 5, Maximum Daily Criteria Air Pollutant Operational Emissions
(lbs/day).
38 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 90
C.1.c
Project Description
Table 5
Maximum Daily Criteria Air Pollutant Operational Emissions (lbs/day)
Source ROGNOCOSOPMPM
X2102.5
Area0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mobile 0.16 1.07 2.18 0.00 0.66 0.18
Total Project Emissions 0.16 1.07 2.18 0.01 0.66 0.18
SCAQMD Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Potentially Significant? No No No No No No
Source: MIG, 2021 (See Appendix A).
As shown in Table 5, the proposed maximum daily operational emission would be below the
SCAQMD’s regional pollutant threshold for all criteria air pollutants. Therefore, operation of the Project
would not generate operational-related emission that exceed SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. This impact
would be less than significant.
Cumulative Emissions
Cumulative short-term, construction-related emissions from the Project will not contribute considerably
to any potential cumulative air quality impact because short-term Project emissions will be less than
significant and other concurrent construction projects in the region will be required to implement
standard air quality regulations and mitigation pursuant to State CEQA requirements, just as this
Project has. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook identifies methodologies for analyzing long-
term cumulative air quality impacts for criteria pollutants for which the Basin is nonattainment. These
methodologies identify three performance standards that can be used to determine if long-term
emissions will result in cumulative impacts. Essentially, these methodologies assess growth
associated with a land use project and are evaluated for consistency with regional projections. These
methodologies are outdated, and are no longer recommended by SCAQMD. SCAQMD allows a
project to be analyzed using the projection method such that consistency with the AQMP will indicate
that a project will not contribute considerably to cumulative air quality impacts. As discussed in
response 4.3.a) above, the proposed Project is consistent with growth assumptions in the AQMP, and
would not exceed any applicable SCAQMD thresholds for short- and long-term emissions. Therefore,
the proposed Project will not contribute to any potential cumulative air quality impacts. Impacts will be
less than significant.
c)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Some populations are more susceptible to
the effects of air pollution than the population at large; these populations are defined as sensitive air
quality receptors. Sensitive receptors include children, the elderly, the sick, and the athletic. Land
uses associated with sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers,
athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and
retirement homes. The sensitive air quality receptors adjacent or in close proximity to the perimeter of
the project include:
Single family residences on West Main Street and California Avenue, approximately 715 feet
from the center of the Project site and approximately 290 feet from the southeast corner of the
Project site; and
School receptors at the Grand Terrace High School, which is located immediately east of the
Project site on the opposite side of Tyler Street. The nearest point where children will be
located during operation of the school is the parking lot located approximately 440 feet from
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
the center of the Project site and approximately 85 feet from the eastern Project boundary.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 39
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 91
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Project Impacts
In addition to criteria air pollutants such as NOx (an ozone precursor), CO, PM, and PM, the U.S.
102.5
EPA and CARB have classified certain pollutants as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) or toxic air
contaminants (TACs), respectively. These pollutants can cause severe health effects at very low
concentrations, and many are suspected or confirmed carcinogens. The U.S. EPA has identified 187
HAPs, including such substances as arsenic and chlorine; CARB considers all U.S. EPA designated
HAPs, as well as diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from diesel-fueled engines and other
substances, to be a TAC.
Construction Health Risks
Project construction activities would result in demolition, site preparation, grading, and other activities
that would generate fugitive dust. A portion of the PM and PM emissions generated during
102.5
construction of the proposed Project would be DPM. Potential health risks from receptor exposure to
DPM concentrations during construction would not be significant, because 1) DPM emissions
generated by construction equipment would generally be pushed by winds to the east/northeast, away
from the closest sensitive residential receptors, 2) emissions would be generated throughout the site
would disperse quickly over time and not remain stagnant in one place due to the presence of active
air movement through the Project area, and 3) emissions would be generated on an interim, short-
term basis. In addition, the proposed Project would be subject SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements for
the control of fugitive dust, including site watering. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose
sensitive receptors to substantial fugitive dust levels. Impacts will be less than significant.
Operational Health Risks
As discussed in response 4.3.b) above, operational emissions will not result from automobile, truck, or
other vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the Project, as the proposed Project does
not constitute such a use and will not include such vehicle trips. In addition, area source emissions
from landscape equipment and consumer cleaning products will not occur as a result of the proposed
Project; however, periodic cleaning and repainting is anticipated. Finally, the proposed Project will not
utilize natural gas and energy demand is anticipated to be negligible. Because of this, operational
health risks from the proposed Project are not anticipated and impacts will be less than significant.
Localized Significance Thresholds
As part of SCAQMD’s environmental justice program, attention has recently been focusing more on
the localized effects of air quality. Although the region may be in attainment for a particular criteria
pollutant, localized emissions from construction activities coupled with ambient pollutant levels can
cause localized increases in criteria pollutant that exceed national and/or state air quality standards.
Construction-related criteria pollutant emissions and potentially significant localized impacts were
evaluated pursuant to the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. This
methodology provides screening tables for one through five-acre project scenarios, depending on the
2
amount of site disturbance during a day using the Fact Sheet for equipment usage in CalEEMod.
Daily oxides of nitrogen (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM and PM)
X102.5
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
2
South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance
Thresholds.
40 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 92
C.1.c
Project Description
emissions will occur during site preparation and construction activities. Table 6, Localized
Construction Significance Threshold Analysis, summarizes on- and off-site emissions as compared to
the local thresholds established for Source Receptor Area (SRA) 34 (Central San Bernardino Valley).
The portion of the Project site that will be developed with the BESS equipment, concrete pads, an
substation will be approximately 209,398 square feet or 4.8 acres. As such, the 5-acre threshold will
be used. A 25-meter receptor distance was used to reflect the proximity of the school parking lot to
the Project site. As shown in Table 6 (Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day)), emissions
from construction activities will not exceed any localized threshold and impacts will be less than
significant.
Table 6
Localized Construction Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day)*
102.5
PhaseCONOPMPM
X
Demolition 10.0 15.91.00.8
Site Preparation/Grading 25.4 44.0 4.4 3.0
BESS Installation 3.2 0.7 0.9 0.2
Paving/Testing 7.3 6.5 0.3 0.3
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Threshold 1,746 270 14 8
Potentially Substantial? No No No No
* Source Receptor Area 34 (Central San Bernardino Valley)
Operation-related LSTs become of concern when there are substantial on-site stationary sources that
could impact surrounding receptors. The proposed Project does not include such on-site operations;
therefore, impacts related to operational LSTs will not occur.
Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots
A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle
congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate
State and Federal CO standards at intersections, even if the broader Basin is in attainment for
Federal and State levels. The California Department of Transportation Project-Level Carbon
Monoxide Protocol (Protocol) screening procedures have been utilized to determine if the proposed
project could potentially result in a CO hotspot. Based on the recommendations of the Protocol, a
screening analysis should be performed for the proposed project to determine if a detailed analysis
will be required. The California Department of Transportation notes that because of the age of the
assumptions used in the screening procedures and the obsolete nature of the modeling tools utilized
to develop the screening procedures in the Protocol, they are no longer accepted. More recent
screening procedures based on more current methodologies have been developed. The Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) developed a screening threshold in 2011,
which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 31,600 vehicles per hour or more
will require detailed analysis. In addition, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District developed a
screening threshold in 2010, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing
44,000 vehicles per hour would require detailed analysis. The proposed Project’s operations would
not involve an intersection experiencing this level of traffic; therefore, the proposed Project passes the
screening analysis and impacts are deemed less than significant. Based on the local analysis
procedures, the proposed Project would not result in a CO hotspot.
d)Less than Significant Impact. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants,
landfills, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturing uses that produce chemicals, paper,
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 41
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 93
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
etc.). The proposed Project would involve construction activities that could generate odors from the
following sources and activities:
Evaporation of gasoline, oil, and other equipment fluids that can escape from pumps, hoses,
and tanks in construction equipment or at construction staging and work areas.
Evaporation and off-gassing of volatile compounds from paints, coatings, and new concrete
and asphalt surfaces.
Exhaust emissions from on-site vehicle and truck maneuvering and idling.
The potential odors associated with construction of the proposed Project are common throughout the
City and County and will be intermittent and temporary. The release of odorous compounds from
vehicle fluids, paints and coatings, asphalt and concrete, and fuel storage and dispensing are
associated with many industrial, commercial, and residential operations and applications. However,
the proposed Project will not involve any odor generating sources and would not result in the release
of atypical odors or odors associated with unique processes (e.g., laundromats, coffee roasting,
landfills, etc.). As such, the proposed Project would not result in the creation of objectionable odors
that would affect a substantial number of people. This impact would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
42 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 94
C.1.c
Project Description
4.4 – Biological Resources
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect
on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect
on state or federally protected
wetlands (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 43
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 95
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Environments and habitats associated with wetlands and other aquatic features are regulated
under federal, state, and local laws. Each of the laws is administered independently and in
coordination with the following agencies: United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), US
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB). A Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (“JD”) Delineation and Biological
Resources Assessment (“Biological Assessment”) was conducted by Dudek (January 2021) in
order to determine the location and extent of wetland and/or water features within the Project Site
that are potentially regulated by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA) and to verify the type, location, and extent of potential sensitive
biological resources within the site and vicinity (See Appendix B). The results presented below
reflect the findings and conclusions found in the JD/Biological Assessment.
Site Description and Field Reconnaissance
Dudek biologist Anna Cassady conducted a jurisdictional waters and wetlands delineation and a
general biological survey of the Project area on October 5, 2020, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:45 p.m.
The survey was conducted when weather conditions were favorable, with no cloud cover, wind
speeds of 1 to 3 miles per hour, and temperatures ranging from 88°F to 97°F. A follow-up site
visit was conducted by Anna Cassady on October 17, 2020, to confirm the location of an outlet
pipe indicated on NHD data. The surveys were conducted on foot and the undeveloped portions
of the site were walked thoroughly to complete the resource inventory. Much of the woodland
region in the northwestern corner was assessed on foot; however, some portions were avoided
due to the presence of homeless encampments.The majority of the Project area is characterized
as undeveloped land, but the northeastern corner of the site has previously been developed for
industrial use. Vegetation on the Project area is dominated by non-native grasses and weedy
forbs, and the observed surface soils show evidence of previous disturbance. A structure is
located on the southeastern corner of the Project area. The Project area historically functioned
as Cage Park and contains ornamental tree species consistent with this use. A concrete
drainage extends from the southeast to the central portion of the site. A mixed ornamental and
riparian woodland patch lies in the northwestern corner. The Project area is relatively flat with
elevations ranging from approximately 939 feet above mean sea level in the west to
approximately 960 feet above mean sea level in the east. Representative photographs of the
Project area are included in Attachment B.
a)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
Special-Status Plants
No federally or state-listed species have a potential to occur within the Project area. No other non-
listed special-status species have a moderate or high potential to occur within the Project area. No
focused special-status plant surveys were conducted, and no special-status plants species were
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
44 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 96
C.1.c
Project Description
incidentally detected within the Project area during the 2020 biological survey. No impacts to special
status plants species will occur as a result of the proposed Project.
Special-Status Wildlife
A total of nine bird species were detected within the Project area, including northern mockingbird
(Mimus polyglottos), common raven (Corvus corax), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), and
Cassin’s kingbird (Tyrannus vociferans). No bird nests were observed during the survey. One reptile,
western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), and one mammal, California ground squirrel
(Spermophilus \[Otospermophilus\] beecheyi), wereobserved. No amphibians were observed. No
federally or state-listed species have a potential to occur within the Project area. However, one
California species of special concern, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), was determined to have a
low potential to occur within the Project area. The remainder of the non-listed special-status species
were determined to have low potential to occur or were not expected to occur within the Project area.
No focused special-status wildlife surveys were conducted. No special-status wildlife species were
incidentally detected within the Project area during the 2020 biological survey. Therefore, impacts to
the remainder of the non-listed special-status species besides burrowing owl will be less than
significant. Discussion of potential burrowing owl impacts and mitigation is discussed below.
Burrowing Owl
No burrowing owl burrows or individuals were observed during the course of the general field survey.
The Project area contains non-native grasslands and disturbed habitat that could be suitable foraging
habitat for burrowing owl; however, no suitable burrows or burrow surrogates (features with openings
4 inches or greater in diameter) were detected within the Project area during field reconnaissance.
Further, the Project area is located within an industrial urbanized complex and is not contiguous with
or near suitable nesting or foraging habitat for this species. Given the lack of suitable nesting habitat
and the location of the Project area within fragmented habitat, potential for burrowing owl to occur on
site is considered low. However, because there is suitable burrowing owl habitat on-site, and in order
for the Project to comply with California Fish and Game Code, pre-construction burrowing owl
surveys are required and avoidance measures must be implemented. Therefore, implementation of
Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is required to reduce potential impacts to burrowing owl to a less than
significant level.Prior to initiation of construction activities, a burrowing owl pre-construction survey
will be conducted in accordance with Appendix D of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation
(CDFW 2012). With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, impacts will be less than
significant.
Mitigation Measure
BIO-1 Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey. A burrowing owl pre-construction survey shall be
conducted no less than 14 days prior to the initiation of ground disturbance activities, and a
second survey shall be conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance. Pre-
construction surveys should be conducted by a qualified biologist. If surveys confirm occupied
burrowing owl habitat is located within the impact footprint or within 500 feet of the impact
footprint, avoidance measures shall be implemented consistent with the requirements of the
Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and in coordination with the City of Grand Terrace
and CDFW.
Nesting Birds
No nests were observed within the Project site during the site reconnaissance. However, suitable
habitat for raptors and ground nesting birds does occur within the Project area and vegetation
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
communities on the Project Site have the potential to provide nesting habitat for bird species
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 45
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 97
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC)
Sections 3503 and 3513. Although no active nests were observed during the field reconnaissance,
there is potential for ground- and tree-nesting birds to establish nests on the Project Site prior to
project construction. Destruction of, or disturbance to, an active nest is prohibited. Construction
activities including site mobilization, tree removal other vegetation clearing activities, grubbing,
grading, and noise/vibration from the operation of heavy equipment also has the potential to result in
significant direct (i.e., death or physical harm) and/or indirect (i.e., nest abandonment) impacts to
nesting birds. Due to the potential for the Project area to contain suitable habitat for nesting bird
species, and in order to maintain compliance with the California Fish and Game Code, Project
construction activities should avoid the avian nesting season (January 1 through September 15) to
reduce potential impacts to nesting birds. If ground disturbance and/or vegetation clearance activities
are scheduled to occur during the avian nesting season, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 has been
incorporated requiring a pre-construction nesting bird survey be conducted by a qualified biologist
within the project footprint and a 300-foot buffer around the project footprint. Surveys are required to
be conducted within 5 days prior to initiation of activity between dawn and noon. If an active nest is
detected during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers should be implemented as determined by
a qualified biologist. The buffer will be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the
nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity
type. All nests will be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged
and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. With
implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, impacts to nesting birds will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
BIO-2: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the
nesting season (typically January 1 to September 15), then a focused survey for active nests
shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic
training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management
activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities
(including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation
removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and
storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small
raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in
areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the
survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather
conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on
areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an
additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are
encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may
be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest,
depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of
construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have
potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction
manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird
nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s)
within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is
occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the
no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active
due to natural causes (e.g., young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest
failure).
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
46 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 98
C.1.c
Project Description
b)Less than Significant Impact. Three vegetation communities—disturbed Goodding’s willow–red
willow riparian woodland and forest, Eucalyptus groves, and non-native grassland—and three land
cover types—unvegetated channel, disturbed habitat, and urban/developed land—were identified and
mapped within the Project site based on general characteristics and/orspecies composition. Exhibit 6,
Vegetation Communities, illustrates the distribution of vegetation communities and land covers on the
site, and Table 6 (Vegetation Communities and Land Covers) provides a summary of each land
cover’s extent within the Project site.
Table 6
Vegetation Communities and Land Covers
Vegetation Community/Land Cover Acreage
Vegetation Communities
Disturbed Goodding’s willow-red riparian woodland and forest 1.49
Eucalyptus groves 0.06
Non-native grassland 6.4
Non-Natural Land Covers
Unvegetated channel 0.11
Disturbed habitat 1.26
Urban/developed 0.48
a
Total 9.87
Sources: Dudek, 2021 (Appendix B); Sawyer et al. 2009; Oberbauer et al. 2008
a
Totals may not sum precisely due to rounding.
Disturbed Goodding’s Willow-Red Willow Riparian Woodland
The Goodding’s willow–red willow riparian woodland alliance features Goodding’s willow (Salix
gooddingii) and/or red willow (Salix laevigata) as the dominant or co-dominant species in the tree
canopy with other characteristic species. Per alliance membership rules, Goodding’s willow or red
willow should generally make up more than 50% of relative cover in the tree canopy; if other willows
are present, Goodding’s willow or red willow can make up 30% or more of the relative cover.
Communities within this alliance can have an open to continuous tree canopy under 30 meters (98
feet) in height with a sparse to continuous shrub layer and variable herbaceous layer. Goodding’s
willow–red willow riparian woodlands were mapped within the northwestern quadrant of the Project
site. This community is dominated by black willow (Salix nigra); however, it also includes a “disturbed”
designator due to the presence of non-native and ornamental woodland species such as Tasmanian
bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus), Peruvian peppertree (Schinus molle), shamel ash (Fraxinus uhdei),
Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia), and blue jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia). Non-native species
comprise approximately 45% of the tree canopy. Other native species associated with this community
in the Project site include Fremont cottonwood and California sycamore. The understory is primarily
comprised of leaf litter.The Goodding’s willow–red willow riparian woodland alliance is ranked by
CDFW as a G4S3 alliance. This ranking indicates that it is apparently secure globally but vulnerable
and at moderate risk within California. Therefore, this community is considered a sensitive community.
In order to avoid impacts to this riparian woodland area, the proposed Project will be constructed in the
northeastern and southwestern corners of the site, and no physical changes to the northwestern area
of the site will occur as a result of the proposed Project. Avoidance measures will be put in place
during construction and operation to ensure that impacts to this riparian woodland are less than
significant. During construction activities, construction vehicles, personnel, and equipment will be
restricted from this area, as will maintenance vehicles and operations personnel during operation of
the BESS facility. Therefore, with avoidance of this area during construction and operation, impacts
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
will be less than significant.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 47
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 99
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Eucalyptus Groves
The eucalyptus–tree of heaven–black locust groves alliance features tree of heaven (Ailanthus
altissima), eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptusspp.), or black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) as the dominant
or co-dominant species in the tree canopy. Per alliance membership rules, any of these species must
make up more than 80% of the relative cover in the tree canopy. Eucalyptus–tree of heaven–black
locust groves within the Project site were mapped as the Eucalyptus globulus provisional association.
TheEucalyptus globulus provisional association is found on the southwestern edge of the Project site.
Tasmanian bluegum was observed as the dominant species in this vegetation community with an
understory of red brome (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens). The eucalyptus–tree of heaven–black
locust groves alliance is ranked by CDFW as a semi-natural alliance and does not have specific global
or state rankings. Therefore, the Eucalyptus globulus provisional association is not considered a
sensitive community. No impact will occur.
Non-Native Grassland
Non-native grassland includes areas that are dominated by non-native grasses with a sub-dominance
of ruderal (weedy) forbs. This type of vegetative community does not readily support native plant or
wildlife species. Non-native grassland is located within the majority the Project site. Sporadic
ornamental trees associated with the woodland area extend into the non-native grassland area;
however, these trees were not present at a high enough density to comprise their own vegetation
community and appear to have been planted in order to support the site’s previous function as a park.
Commonly observed non-native species in this community include red brome, ripgut brome (Bromus
diandrus), slender oat (Avena barbata), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), prickly lettuce (Lactuca
serriola), and stinknet (Oncosiphon piluliferum). Non-native grasslands would be listed by CDFW
under red brome or Mediterranean grass grasslands. The red brome or Mediterranean grass
grasslands alliance is ranked by CDFW as a semi-natural alliance and does not have specific global or
state rankings; therefore, these alliances are not considered sensitive communities. No impact will
occur.
Unvegetated Channel
Although not recognized by the Manual of California Vegetation,Online Edition (Sawyer et al. 2009),
or the Natural Communities List, unvegetated channels (or non-vegetated floodplains) are described
by Oberbaueret al. (2008) as sandy, gravelly, or rocky areas along waterways or flood channels that
are unvegetated on a relatively permanent basis due to variable water levels. Vegetation, if present,
comprises non-native grasses at the outer edges with usually less than 10% absolute cover. Within
the Project site, unvegetated channels are mapped from the southeastern corner through the central
portion of the Project site. Unvegetated channel is not a listed vegetation community under the
California Natural Communities List; however, it best describes what was observed in the field. This
vegetation community is not considered a sensitive community; however, its function as a waterway
makes this community sensitive as a jurisdictional resource, more information for which is contained in
response 4.4.c) below. In order to avoid impacts to the on-site non-vegetated flood plains, the
proposed Project will be constructed in the northeastern and southwestern corners of the site, and no
physical changes to the non-vegetated flood plains will occur as a result of the proposed Project.
Avoidance measures will be put in place during construction and operation to ensure that impacts to
these features are less than significant. During construction activities, construction vehicles, personnel,
and equipment will be restricted from these areas, as will maintenance vehicles and operations
personnel during operation of the BESS facility. Therefore, with avoidance of these areas during
construction and operation, impacts will be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
48 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 100
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 7
Vegetation Communities
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 49
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 101
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
50 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 102
C.1.c
Project Description
c) Less than Significant. The USACE and EPA regulate the discharge of dredged or fill material into
waters of the United States, including wetlands, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Section 404
of the CWA requires a permit before dredged or fill material may be discharged into waters of the
United States. Section 401 of the CWA requires an applicant for a federal permit to obtain a certification
from the RWQCB. Additionally, Section 1602 of the CFGC requires the issuance of a Lake and
Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) to authorize work in jurisdictional streambeds. According to
the JD/Biological Assessment performed by Dudek, the Project area is located within the Middle Santa
Ana River watershed in the Santa Ana Subbasin, within which the Santa Ana River is the major surface
water body (Figure 4, Hydrologic Units of the JD/Biological Assessment). As shown in Exhibit 8
(Hydrology), there is one National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) ephemeral stream extending from the
western boundary of the Project site, extending west to connect with an unnamed tributary to the Santa
Ana River.
As further described below, the JD/Biological Assessment identified two water bodies, a concrete
channel and a shallow basin, within the Project site as waters of the state under the jurisdiction of
RWQCB and CDFW. The concrete channel is also a water of the United States. No other potentially
jurisdictional waters were observed within the Project site. The limits of jurisdictional waters are
provided in Exhibit 9 (Jurisdictional Delineation Results).
Concrete Channel
As shown in Exhibit 8, the trapezoidal concrete channel extends from three separate inlets, two from
Taylor Street and one from Main Street. The northern inlet is characterized as a break in the curb
where runoff from Taylor Street enters the channel. The southern inlet on Taylor Street is a pipe inlet
that appears to convey flows from off site to the east, presumed to be stormwater runoff from the
surrounding development. The inlet on Main Street is characterized as a pipe inlet that also appears to
convey flows from off site to the south, presumed to be stormwater runoff from surrounding
development. These inlets convey flows northwest through the concrete channel until its terminus in
the shallow basin at the northwestern end of the Project site. Approximately 40 feet of the concrete
channel is undergrounded through a pipe under an old roadway in the Project site. The channel
continues for approximately 30 feet within the shallow basin as a natural, sandy bottomed channel
before dissipating. The channel loses consistent hydrology indicators within the shallow basin,
appearing to continue along periodic, low topographic areas until reaching a pipe at the western
boundary where flow exits the Project site. NHD data suggest this pipe continues through a series of
storm drain pipes beneath Interstate 215 to a natural drainage west of La Cadena Drive. The natural
drainage, located approximately 0.3 miles from the Project site, continues southwest to the Santa Ana
River.
The concrete channel is a remnant of a historical drainage that extended through the Project site and
connected with a tributary to the Santa Ana River. This feature is observed as early as 1938 and
appears to have been channelized on the Project site between 1948 and 1959. On both historic aerials
and topographic maps, the drainage appears to originate on site in approximately the same location as
present day. The concrete channel is approximately 8 feet in width and an average of 3 feet deep.
Hydrology indicators included standing water, debris wracking, and sediment deposition. The feature
also contained defined banks. The concrete channel was primarily unvegetated; however, a small
(approximately 8-foot) segment had excess sediment buildup that supported obligate and facultative
wetland species such as broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia) and tall flatsedge (Cyperus eragrostis). The
concrete channel was delineated at the boundary of the defined bank.
Due to the presence of obligate and facultative wetland species within the concrete channel, a wetland
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
delineation was conducted within the vegetation. A data station (DS-1) taken in this location resulted in
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 51
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 103
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation and evidence of wetland hydrology. Given that the vegetation
was contained within excess (1–3 inches) of sedimentation on top of an impermeable concrete layer,
hydric soils were considered absent. Additionally, given the small extent of the vegetation, this feature
was considered a non-wetland water consistent with the remainder of the concrete channel.
Due to the presence of standing water and obligate and facultative wetland vegetation, the concrete
channel is not an ephemeral feature; however, it is considered intermittent. The feature connects with a
traditional navigable water through its connectivity to the Santa Ana River; therefore, the concrete
channel is a water of the United States under USACE jurisdiction. Based on the presence of hydrology
indicators and connection with the Santa Ana River, the concrete channel was delineated as a non-
wetland water of the state under RWQCB jurisdiction of and a streambed under CDFW jurisdiction.
Shallow Basin
The Project site contains a shallow basin. The shallow basin is located at the terminus of the concrete
channel in the northwestern end of the Project site. This feature is vegetated as disturbed Goodding’s
willow–red willow riparian woodland and comprises native species such as black willow and California
sycamore, but also contains high cover of non-native and ornamental tree species such as Tasmanian
bluegum, Peruvian peppertree, Chinese elm, and blue jacaranda. The high cover of ornamental tree
species is likely a relic of the Project site’s previous function as a park. The shallow basin did not
contain hydrology indicators, with the exception of topographic relief on the west, north, and eastern
sides, suggesting that flows, if present, would pool in the location. Additionally, topographic relief
extending from the concrete channel continues on an intermittent basis northwest until reaching a pipe
at the western boundary where flow exits the Project site. Additionally, an inlet pipe was observed at
the southwestern edge of the shallow basin; however, no hydrology indicators were observed leading
from it, indicating it may no longer be in use or flows infrequently. No other hydrology indicators were
observed. The tree understory was comprised of a deep layer of leaf litter. A small patch of tall
flatsedge was observed at the northern end of the shallow basin. The shallow basin was delineated at
the dripline of riparian vegetation.
The shallow basin is remnant of a historical drainage that extended through the Project site and
connected with a tributary to the Santa Ana River. This basin feature is mapped on historic topographic
maps beginning in 1955. The area appears to have been converted into a park between 1948 and
1959. Due to the presence of facultative wetland species within the shallow basin, a wetland
delineation was conducted within this vegetation community. A data station (DS-2) taken in this location
resulted in a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation; however, no evidence of wetland hydrology or
hydric soils were observed, as further described in Section 5.3. Given the lack of hydrology indicators
and hydric soils, this feature was considered a non-wetland water consistent with the remainder of the
shallow basin. Based on the presence of hydrology indicators and ephemeral connection with the
Santa Ana River, the shallow basin was delineated to be a non-wetland water of the state under
RWQCB jurisdiction and a riparian lakebed under CDFW jurisdiction. The shallow basin lacks ordinary
high water mark (OHWM) indicators and therefore would not be considered a water of the United
States.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
52 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 104
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 8
Hydrology
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 53
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 105
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
54 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 106
C.1.c
Project Description
Exhibit 9
Jurisdictional Delineation Results
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 55
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 107
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
56 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 108
C.1.c
Project Description
Summary of Findings
As described above and shown in Exhibit 8, hydrology, vegetation, and soils were assessed at two
data station locations to determine the presence or absence of wetlands field indicators. DS-1 is
located within the concrete channel. This data station contained evidence of wetland vegetation with
presence of broadleaf cattail (Obligate), tall flatsedge (Facultative Wetland \[FACW\]), and saltgrass
(Distichlisspicata; Facultative). This data station contained evidence of hydrology, including surface
water at a depth of 1 inch, sediment deposition, and drift deposits. However, the data station lacked
viable hydric soil indicators given its presence within a concrete channel. Sediment deposition ranging
from 1 to 3 inches supported the presence of herbaceous hydrophytic vegetation; however, this
sediment was contained within a concrete channel that likely functioned as an artificial duripan that
supported the vegetation growth. Due to the lack of hydric soils, this data point is not within a wetland.
DS-2 is located within the shallow basin. This data station contained evidence of wetland vegetation
with presence of black willow (FACW) and tall flatsedge (FACW); however, it lacked viable hydric soil
indicators and hydrology indicators. Due to the lack of hydric soils and hydrology, this data point is not
within a wetland.
Conclusion
The results of the jurisdictional delineation concluded there are approximately 0.11 acres (761 linear
feet) of non-wetland waters of the state and waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of
ACOE, the RWQCB, and CDFW. Additionally, there are 1.49 acres (328 linear feet) of riparian waters
of the state under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB and CDFW. In order to avoid permanent loss of
waters or functions and values of waters of the United States, the proposed Project will be
constructed in the northeastern and southwestern corners of the site, and no physical changes to
either the concrete channel or shallow basin will occur as a result of the proposed Project.
Avoidance measures will be put in place during construction and operation to ensure that
impacts to these waters do not occur. During construction activities, construction vehicles,
personnel, and equipment will be restricted from accessing these areas, as will maintenance
vehicles and operations personnel during operation of the BESS facility. Therefore, with
avoidance of these features during construction and operation, impacts will be less than
significant.
d) No Impact. The Project Site is surrounded on all sides by developed land and is not located
within an established wildlife movement corridor. The Project Site is not a known wildlife nursery site.
Thus, no impacts to wildlife species, migratory corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites are anticipated.
e)No Impact. The City of Grand Terrace does not have a tree preservation ordinance or other local
policy or ordinance protecting biological resources. Therefore, development of the proposed Project
will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance. No impact will occur.
f) No Impact. The Project site is not within any Habitat Conservation Plan area and no impacts
8
would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 57
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 109
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.5 – Cultural Resources
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a historical
resource pursuant to §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside of
dedicated cemeteries?
AHistoric Resource Evaluation Report, dated February 2021, was prepared for the proposed Project
by Dudek (See Appendix C) to evaluate the historical significance of the Highgrove Steam Plant in
consideration of state designation criteria and integrity requirements. An Archaeological Resources
Memorandum, date February 12, 2021, was also prepared for the proposed Project by Dudek (See
Appendix D) to identify all archaeological resources within the Project’s area of potential effect (APE)
and to determine whether the Project would result in a significant impact relating to cultural resources.
The results presented below reflect the findings and conclusions found in the Report and the
Memorandum.
a)Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is the former site of the abandoned Cage Park,
which was a landscaped feature of the Highgrove Steam Plant located immediately to the north of the
site. The Highgrove Steam Plant was constructed between 1951 and 1955, making it more than 50
years old. In order to determine whether the proposed Project has the potential to impact historical
resources under CEQA, the Highgrove Steam Plant was evaluated as a whole in consideration of
California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) designation criteria and integrity requirements. A
detailed physical description of the Highgrove Steam Plant and a complete set of State of California
Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 forms (DPR forms) is provided in Appendix B of the
Historic Resource Evaluation Report. The Highgrove Steam Plant property includes nine components,
comprising six buildings, three structures, and three areas of foundations. Surrounding the property is
a chain-link fence with an additional chain-link fence in the center dividing the property in two. Cage
Park can be accessed from a gate along the southern boundary of the project site off West Main
Street, and the Highgrove Steam Plant is accessed on the east from Taylor Street via a paved
driveway. Open grass spaces are located to the south and north of the Highgrove Steam Plant. At the
southern end of the property is a series of concrete-lined canals running northeast to southwest,
terminating at the southeastern corner of the Project site. Multiple overgrown paths of circulation
meander throughout the Project site, and a dried-up lake filled with overgrown trees is in the
northwest portion of the site. Multiple metal light posts are located at the southern end of the Project
site. According to the Historic Resource Evaluation Report, the Highgrove Steam Plant is not eligible
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
under any CRHR designation criteria at the individual level due to a lack of the requisite integrity
58 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 110
C.1.c
Project Description
necessary to convey significant historical associations and a lack of architectural merit.As a result of
the evaluation, the Highgrove Steam Plant is recommended not eligible as a historical resource under
CEQA. Therefore, no historical resources were identified within the Project Area and a less than
significant impact to historical resources will occur as a result of the proposed Project.
b)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.The Project Site has been previously
disturbed by modern human activities that would have displaced surface and subsurface
archaeological resources. However, according to the Grand Terrace General Planthe City is located
along the border of territories known to have been occupied by the Serrano, Gabrieleño (Tongva), and
Cahuilla Indians, with the Serrano to the north, Gabrieleño to the west, and Cahuilla to the south and
east. It is likely that all these groups passed through or exploited resources within the City limits at
different times in prehistory (Open Space/Conservation Element, 4.2.3). Dudek conducted a
pedestrian survey of the project APE on February 2, 2021, using standard archaeological procedures
and techniques.No historical or prehistoric resources were observed during the course of this survey.
However, as recommended by Dudek, in the unlikely event that archeological materials are
uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4 have been
incorporated to reduce potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation
Measure CUL-1 requires that a qualified archaeologist conduct an archaeological sensitivity training
for construction personnel. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 requires that a qualified archaeological monitor
be present during all construction excavations into non-fill sediments. If archaeological resources are
encountered, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 requires that all ground-disturbing activities must be halted or
diverted away from the find and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established around the find until an
appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires that the archaeological
monitor prepare a final report at the conclusion of archaeological monitoring. With implementation of
Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4, impacts will be less than significant as a result of
construction of the proposed Project.
Mitigation Measures
CUL-1: Conduct Archaeological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The
Applicant shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist who meets U.S. Secretary of
the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct an Archaeological
Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation
activities. The training session shall be carried out by a cultural resource professional with
expertise in archaeology, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on
how to identify archaeological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving
activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of archaeological
monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional archaeologist would follow in
conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Archeological Resources Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-
Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist, who
meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to
conduct periodic Archaeological Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to
determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing
archaeological resources. After the initial Archaeological Spot Check, further periodic
checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist. If the qualified
archaeologist determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
probability of exposing archaeological artifacts, construction monitoring for archaeological
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 59
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 111
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor,
who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets
the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications
and Standards. The archaeological monitor shall be present during all construction
excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill younger
Pleistocene alluvial sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require
multiple archaeological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of
excavation and grading activities, proximity to known archaeological resources, the
materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if
found, the abundance and type of archaeological resources encountered. Full-time
monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project
archaeologist.
CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Archaeological
Resources Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed
during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted
away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least
100 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be
allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the newly discovered
artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside
of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities
shall be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist, who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered
artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals shall be
contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring shall be initiated.
The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate
treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological
data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent
laboratory processing and analysis.
CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The archaeological monitor,
under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at
the conclusion of archaeological monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to
the Applicant, the South Central Coastal Information Center, the City, and representatives
of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the
Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of
resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California
Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources.
c)Less than Significant Impact. No known human remains are anticipated to be located on or
beneath the Project site. However, these findings do not preclude the existence of previously
unknown human remains located below the ground surface, which may be encountered during
construction excavations associated with the Project, and it is possible to encounter buried human
remains during construction. As a result, mitigation measure CUL-5 is required to reduce potentially
significant impacts to previously unknown human remains that may be unexpectedly discovered
during Project implementation to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires that
in the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered the contractor is required to halt work in the
immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Health and Safety
Code § 7050.5, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner,
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a
60 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 112
C.1.c
Project Description
Native American, he/she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further
investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. With implementation of mitigation,
impacts will be less than significant as a result of construction of the proposed Project.
Mitigation Measure
CUL-5: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Notify County Coroner If Human Remains
Are Encountered. If human remains are unearthed during implementation of the Project,
the City of Commerce and the Applicant shall comply with State Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5. The City of Commerce and the Applicant shall immediately notify the
County Coroner and no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made
the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. If the
remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to
notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then identify
the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). After the MLD has
inspected the remains and the site, they have 48 hours to recommend to the landowner
the treatment and/or disposal, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any
associated funerary objects. Upon the reburial of the human remains, the MLD shall file a
record of the reburial with the NAHC and the Project archaeologist shall file a record of the
reburial with the CHRIS-SCCIC. If the NAHC is unable to identify a MLD, or the MLD
identified fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation of
the MLD and the mediation provided for in Subdivision (k) of Section 5097.94, if invoked,
fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner or his or her
authorized representative shall inter the human remains and items associated with Native
American human remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject
to further and future subsurface disturbance.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 61
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 113
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.6 – Energy
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to
wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or
operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or
local plan for renewable energy or
energy efficiency??
a)Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project, an energy storage facility with associated
appurtenances, would be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and local building regulations,
including the California Building Code (CBC) as approved by the Grand Terrace Building & Safety
Division. The proposed Project could potentially have a significant impact on the environment if it
resulted in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during construction
or operation, or if it conflicts with or obstructs a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency. These potential impacts are discussed below.
Electricity
Construction of the Project would require the use of nonrenewable construction material, such as
concrete, metals, and plastics. However, large amounts of energy would not be expended, and all
construction vehicles would comply with federal and state standards for on- and off-road vehicles
(e.g., emission standards set by the California Air Resources Board), meaning wasteful usage of
energy would not occur. Construction-related impacts would therefore be less than significant.
The proposed solar energy storage Project, when complete, would operate to store electrical energy
for a period of up to 30 years, which will include energy generated by renewable sources. Operation
of the BESS facility would require minimal electricity. As such, operation of the Project would not lead
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during operation. Impacts
will be less than significant.
Fossil Fuels
During construction of the Project, energy in the form of gasoline and diesel petroleum (fossil fuels)
will be used to fuel construction vehicles and construction-worker vehicles traveling to and from the
site. However, construction vehicles are manufactured and maintained according to Federal and State
regulations aimed at reducing fossil fuel consumption. In addition, construction activities are
temporary and will cease upon completion of Project development. As such, development of the
Project will not lead to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of fossil fuels during
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
construction. Impacts will be less than significant.
62 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 114
C.1.c
Project Description
Energy, in the form of fossil fuels, would also be used to fuel vehicles traveling to and from the site to
inspect, repair or maintain the BESS facility over the course of the Project’s operational lifetime.
However, vehicle maintenance trips would be irregular (typically once or twice a year), and operation
of the solar energy generation and storage facility would not generate daily trips. As such, operation of
the Project will not lead to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of fossil fuels during
operation and impacts will be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact. As noted in the City’s 2010 General Plan Open Space and
Conservation Element, the City of Grand Terrace has adopted goals and policies to address
9
conservation energy resources. These goals and policies include:
Goal 4.6:The City shall support and promote the conservation of energy resources.
Policy 4.6.1:The City shall establish an energy conservation policy and implementation program for
all City facilities.
Policy 4.6.2:The City shall implement a public outreach program to provide the public with
information regarding energy conservation practices and programs.
Policy 4.6.3:The City shall encourage energy and environmentally sustainable design in new land
development projects using the standards of Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED).
Policy 4.7.7:The City shall promote energy conservation efforts in new and existing residences and
businesses.
Policy 8.4.5: Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of all new
housing developments and the addition of energy conservation devices/practices in
existing residential developments
Goal 9.3: Reduce the City’s per capita energy usage.
Policy 9.1.1: The City shall work with Southern California Edison to promote energy conservation at
residences and businesses.
Policy 9.1.2: The City shall incorporate energy conservation measures into conditions of approval
for new development projects.
The Climate Change Scoping Plan is the state’s roadmap to reach the greenhouse gas reduction
10
goals required in the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, or AB 32. This plan calls for an
ambitious but achievable reduction in California’s carbon footprint – toward a clean energy future.
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels means cutting approximately 30% from business-
as-usual emissions levels projected for 2020, or about 15% from today’s levels. On a per-capita basis,
that means reducing annual emissions of 14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman and child in
California down to about 10 tons per person by 2020. This challenge also represents an opportunity to
transform California’s economy into one that runs on clean and sustainable technologies, helping
secure our energy independence and security, and ensure that all Californians are able to enjoy their
rights to clean air, clean water, and a healthy and safe environment. The AB 32 Scoping Plan includes
several key strategies aimed at achieving these goals. One of the key strategies of the AB 32 Scoping
Plan involves Electricity and Energy, with the State having a goal of 33% renewables by 2020.
Instead of conflicting with these state and local renewable energy and energy efficiency plans, the
proposed solar energy storage Project would have the effect of helping to achieve the stated goals of
these plans. The Project would also help the City achieve its goals of supporting and promoting the
conservation of energy resources by providing more storage for renewable energy sources.
Additionally, the project will help the State of California achieve its AB 32 Scoping Plan targets of 33%
renewable energy by 2020. As such, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or
local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 63
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 115
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.7 – Geology and Soils
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
Project, and potentially result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1997),
creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
64 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 116
C.1.c
Project Description
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste
water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
AGeotechnical Investigation Report, dated March 17, 2021, was prepared for the proposed Project by
Dudek (See Appendix E) to identify geological conditions and hazards in the Project area and to
determine whether the Project would result in a significant impact relating to geology and soils. The
results presented below reflect the findings and conclusions found in the report.
a.i)No Impact. According to the Grand Terrace General Plan, there are no known faults within the
11
Grand Terrace City limits. The closest known active fault to the Project site is the San Bernardino
Valley segment of the San Jacinto Fault, which is approximately 3.5 miles to the northeast at its
nearest location. Although the Project site is located in seismically active Southern California, the site
12
is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No active faults have been identified
at the ground surface on the Project site. The Project will not directly or indirectly rupture a known
earthquake fault. No impact will occur.
a.ii)Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an area of high regional seismicity.
According to the General Plan, there are seven known fault zones located in the vicinity that could
result in a seismic hazard. These include the Rialto-Colton Fault, the San Jacinto Fault, the Loma
Linda Fault, the San Andreas Fault, the Cucamonga Fault, and the Chino-Elsinore Fault. However,
13
there are no known faults within the Grand Terrace City Limits. Ground shaking originating from
earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal
accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The
Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the California Building Code (CBC). The 2019
California Building Code (California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Volume 2)
contains seismic safety provisions with the aim of preventing building collapse during a design
earthquake, so that occupants would be able to evacuate after the earthquake. A design earthquake
is one with a two percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, or an average return period of 2,475
years. Adherence to these requirements will reduce potential impacts from collapse during an
earthquake, thereby minimizing injury and loss of life. Although Project features may be damaged
during earthquakes, adherence to seismic design requirements will minimize damage to property
within the Project features because the Project features are designed not to collapse. The CBC is
intended to provide minimum requirements to prevent major structural failure and loss of life.
Adherence to existing regulations will reduce the risk of loss, injury, and death; impacts due to strong
ground shaking would be less than significant with construction of the proposed energy storage
facility.
a.iii)No Impact. Liquefaction generally occurs as a “quicksand” type of ground failure caused by
strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include groundwater, soil
type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground
shaking. The San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map does not include the Project site
14
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
within a liquefaction susceptibility area. Moreover, the General Plan Public Health and Safety
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 65
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 117
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
15
Element concludes that liquefaction is not considered a direct hazard to the City of Grand Terrace.
In addition, the subsurface conditions at the site are not considered to be conducive to liquefaction.
Based on the mapping performed by San Bernardino County the City of Grand Terrace and the
conditions encountered at the site, adverse impacts due to the risk of liquefaction are not anticipated.
No impact will occur.
a.iv)No Impact. Landslides are mass movements of the ground that include rock falls, relatively
shallow slumping and sliding of soil, and deeper rotational or transitional movement of soil or rock.
The Project site is relatively flat and, according to the San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard
16
Overlay Map, is not located within an area susceptible to landslides. Therefore, there would be no
impact from landslides on the Project and no mitigation is required.
b)Less than Significant Impact. Topsoil is used to cover surface areas for the establishment and
maintenance of vegetation due to its high concentrations of organic matter and microorganisms. Little
native topsoil is likely to occur on the site because it is partially developed and has been disturbed in
the past. Construction of the proposed energy storage facility would have the potential to expose
surficial soils to wind and water erosion during construction activities. However, wind erosion would be
minimized through soil stabilization measures required by South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), such as daily watering. Water erosion would also be
prevented through the City’s standard erosion control practices (Municipal Code Sections 13.20.220
and 13.20.230) required pursuant to the California Building Code and the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES). Therefore, impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant
with implementation of existing regulations.
c)Less than Significant Impact. Impacts related to liquefaction and landslides are discussed above
in Sections 4.7.a, above. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to
liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The downslope movement is due to gravity and earthquake shaking
combined. Such movement can occur on slope gradients of as little as one degree. Lateral spreading
typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. Lateral spreading of the ground surface
during a seismic activity usually occurs along the weak shear zones within a liquefiable soil layer and
has been observed to generally take place toward a free face (i.e., retaining wall, slope, or channel)
and to lesser extent on ground surfaces with a very gentle slope. Due to the absence of any channel
within the Project site, and the subsurface soil conditions that are not conducive to liquefaction, the
potential for lateral spread occurring on the Project site is considered to be negligible. The Project site
is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that has been identified as being unstable
or having the potential to result on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse. The Project site is relatively flat and consists of native alluvial soils and non-native soils.
The Project is required to be constructed in accordance with the 2019 CBC. Compliance with existing
CBC regulations would limit hazard impacts arising from unstable soils to less than significant levels.
Therefore, the Project would not likely result in landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse and no mitigation is required.
d)Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils are classified as ranging from very low to very
high according to expansion index criteria established by Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(ICBO, 1994). Based on a review of geologic maps and nearby boring data (County of Riverside,
1999 and Delta, 2010), it is anticipated that much of the site soils consist of sand, silt, and gravel. As
such, site soils are anticipated to have a low potential for expansion. The Project would be required to
be in conformance with the 2019 California Building Code, City regulations, and other applicable
standards. It is the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer of record to evaluate the potential for
expansive soils and to provide appropriate design recommendations to address the potential hazards.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
66 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 118
C.1.c
Project Description
Conformance with standard engineering practices and adherence to design criteria would reduce
impacts related to expansive soil potential to a less than significant level.
e)No Impact. The Project proposes to connect to the existing municipal sewer system and would
not require use of septic tanks. No impact would occur.
f)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site has been partially disturbed
by previous development. Any buried paleontological resources would have already been uncovered
or destroyed at the time of initial grading of the Project site. However, in the event that paleontological
materials are uncovered, Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4 are required to reduce
potentially significant impacts to previously undiscovered paleontological resources and/or unique
geological features that may be accidentally encountered during Project implementation to a less than
significant level. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 requires that a paleontological sensitivity training for
construction personnel be conducted before commencement of excavation activities. Mitigation
Measure GEO-2 requires that a qualified paleontologist conduct periodic paleontological spot checks
to determine if excavations have extended into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits as well as the
presence of a paleontological monitor during all excavations into the local geologic formation or into
older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Mitigation Measure GEO-3 requires that ground-disturbing
activities be halted or diverted away from the vicinity and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be
established if paleontological materials are encountered until an appropriate treatment plan is
coordinated. Mitigation Measure GEO-4 requires that a professional paleontologist prepare a report
summarizing the results of the monitoring efforts, methodology used, and the description of fossils
collected and their significance. With implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4,
impacts to paleontological resources will be less than significant as a result of construction of the
proposed Project.
Mitigation Measures
GEO-1:Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The
Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth
by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity
Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The
training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources
that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed
in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures
to follow upon discovery of resources, the general steps a qualified professional
paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
GEO-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving
activities.The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the
qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic
Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if
construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial
Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of
the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction
excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for
Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified
paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional
paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 67
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 119
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple
paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of
excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or
unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils),
and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological
resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be
reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional
paleontologist.
GEO-3:Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if
Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological
resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing
activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of
the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be
established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue
until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and
the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and
City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set
forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan
for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage
excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and
analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce
construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock
samples for initial processing.
GEO-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the
above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the
results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as
well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be
submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County,
and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory
completion of the Project and required mitigation measures.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
68 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 120
C.1.c
Project Description
4.8 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Greenhouse gas emissions were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod), version 2016.3.2. Project construction-generated greenhouse gas emissions were
calculated using CalEEMod model defaults for San Bernardino County. Operational greenhouse gas
emissions were based on the Project site plans.
a)Less than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a
long period of time. Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes
such as changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself
(e.g., changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of
GHG and changes to the planet’s surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of
fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation);
methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural
practices.
GHGs differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the “greenhouse effect.” The greenhouse
effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of
radiation from the Sun hits the Earth’s surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back
towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and
prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re-radiate it in all directions. This
process is essential to supporting life on Earth, because it warms the planet by approximately 60°
Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution
(approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in
the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth’s temperature.
GHGs occur naturally and from human activities. GHGs produced by human activities include carbon
dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons
(PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon
dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent,
and18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of GHGs affect the
atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 69
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 121
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
GHG emissions for the proposed Project were quantified utilizing the California Emissions Estimator
Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2to determine if the Project could have a cumulatively
considerable impact related to greenhouse gas emissions. The Project’s total GHG emissions (i.e.,
operational emissions combined with the amortized construction emissions) are shown in Table 7,
Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and compared against the SCAQMD’s lowest recommended
screening level of 1,400 MTCOe/yr. for commercial projects.As shown in Table 7, the total GHG
2
emissions generated from the Project is approximately 130.9 MTCO2E per year which includes
construction-related emissions amortized over a typical project life of 30 years.Therefore, the
proposed Project will not exceed the applicable draft GHG screening thresholds and impacts would be
less than significant.
Table 7
Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG Emissions (MT/YR)
Source
COCHNOCOe
2422
(A)
Area 0.0 0.00.0<0.0
Energy 0.0 0.00.00.0
(A)
Mobile 103.9 <0.0 0.0 104.1
Waste 2.5 0.10.06.2
(A)
Water 10.3 0.1<0.0 12.8
(A)
Amortized Construction 7.8 <0.0 0.0 7.8
(B)(A)
Total 124.6 0.3 <0.0 130.9
SCAQMD Commercial Land Use Threshold 1,400
SCAQMD Commercial Land Use Threshold Exceeded? No
Source: MIG 2020 (See Appendix A)
Note:
(A) <0.0 does not mean emissions are zero; rather, it means emissions are less than 0.05, but greater than
zero.
(B) Slight variations may occur due to rounding.
b)No Impact. As shown above, the Project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Additionally, the Project’s
consistency with AB 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 32 are discussed below.
AB 32 Consistency. AB 32 was adopted in 2006 and requires California to reduce its GHG
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set
forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are
also consistent with AB 32 goal.
The Project would generate GHG emissions, directly and indirectly, from a variety of sources. The
CARB Scoping Plan includes strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of
AB 32. These strategies serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. The Project
would be subject to the applicable measures established in the Scoping Plan because these
measures are implemented at the state level. Therefore, the Project would not conflict or otherwise
interfere with implementation of AB 32.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
70 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 122
C.1.c
Project Description
SB 32 Consistency. SB 32 was adopted in 2016 and requires the state to reduce statewide GHG
emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 codifies the reduction target issued in Executive
Order B-30-15. SB 32 builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an interim goal
to achieving Executive Order S-3-05’s 2050 reduction goal of 80% below 1990 levels.
The CARB 2017 Scoping Plan identified reduction measures to achieve the SB 32 GHG reduction
goal. Like the previously adopted Scoping Plans, the 2017 Scoping Plan includes statewide reduction
measures that are implemented at the state level. The Project would be subject to the applicable
measures established in the 2017 Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the
state level.
Additionally, the 2014 Scoping Plan Update indicates "California is on track to meet the near-term
2020 greenhouse gas limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as
required by AB 32"; and it recognizes the potential for California to "reduce emissions by 2030 to
levels squarely in line with those needed in the developed world and to stay on track to reduce
emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050."
Moreover, the Project does not propose facilities or operations that would substantively interfere with
any future County-mandated, state-mandated, or federally-mandated regulations enacted or
promulgated to legally require development to assist in meeting state-adopted GHG emissions
reduction targets, including those established under Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-
15, SB 32, or the 2017 Scoping Plan.
Therefore, the Project would not conflict with implementation of SB 32 or otherwise interfere with
implementation of this or future goals.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 71
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 123
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.9 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing
or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the Project result in a
safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the
Project area?
f) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures, either
directly or indirectly, to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
wildland fires?
72 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 124
C.1.c
Project Description
APhase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the proposed Project by Alta
Environmental DBA NV5 (Alta Environmental), which is dated October 29, 2020, and is included as
Appendix F. The information in this section of the Initial Study related to hazards and hazardous
emissions is based on the analysis provided in the Phase I ESA.
a)Less than Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the proposed Project could create
significant hazards as a result of the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials during
either construction or operation. These potential impacts are discussed below.
Short-term (Construction Period) Activities. The results of the Project Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment found that there is no evidence of a Controlled “recognized environmental condition”
(REC), or historic REC, in connection with the site. Project construction activities would involve the
temporary use and transport of fuels, lubricating fluids, solvents, and other hazardous materials. The
contractor would be required to develop and adhere to a Health and Safety Plan, which pursuant to
California state Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.95, Division 20 (§§ 25500-25532), would minimize
potentially hazardous effects of handling potentially hazardous materials during construction. Project
compliance with federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to safe transport, use, handling, and
disposal of hazardous materials would reduce these effects, and this potential would be considered a
less-than-significant impact.
Long-term (Operational) Activities. The proposed Project includes development and operation of an
energy storage facility and related appurtenances. Routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
waste or materials is not associated with this type of use and the Project will only generate a nominal
amount of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) because of routine maintenance and cleaning
operations. Disposal of HHW will be required to comply with federal, State, and local regulations
related to disposal of wastes. Compliance with these regulations would minimize potentially
hazardous effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact. According to the State Water Resources Control Board, there are
no open cases of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) within one-quarter mile of the Project
17
site. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact related to the release of hazardous
materials into the environment because of development of the proposed energy storage facility.
Construction of the Project would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as
asphalt, paints, and other solvents. Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes
associated with the use of such products. Construction of the proposed Project would require ordinary
construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon number of hazardous
materials to complete. All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in
accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices
include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels,
solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Construction-related impacts would be less than
significant with adherence to existing regulations.
As discussed above, the Phase I ESA conducted for the proposed Project revealed no evidence of
“recognized environmental conditions” (RECs) on the Project site. The Phase I ESA did not identify
the presence of any other possible hazardous materials present in the soils on the site, including
pesticides and herbicides from past agricultural use, potential lead-based paint, or asbestos-
containing materials (ACMs) that could result in the release of hazardous materials into the
environment. Therefore, impacts from the release of these materials into the environment, through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions, would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 73
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 125
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Finally, a Hazards Analysis Final Report, dated June 1, 2021, was prepared for the proposed Project
by MRS Environmental (See Appendix G). As stated in the Hazards Analysis Report, the Project is
required to develop and Emergency Operations Plan in compliance with National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Section 4.1.3.2.1. Fire prevention systems would include proposed cabinets
designed to limit or eliminate the potential for fire to spread from one cabinet to another, infrared
camera monitoring at the site for external fire detection and onsite fire hydrants. Additional items
include video monitoring of the site, site lighting, site security, training, fire access planning and fire
water flow design.Tesla provides an Emergency Response Guide for the Megapack detailing
hazards, firefighting measures, shutting down and disposal of materials and also recommends a
number of firefighting measures. Fire prevention systems would include proposed cabinets designed
to limit or eliminate the potential for fire to spread from one cabinet to another, infrared camera
monitoring at the site for external fire detection and onsite fire hydrants. Additional items include video
monitoring of the site, site lighting, site security, training, fire access planning and fire water flow
design. The Battery Management System (BMS) would monitor all cell voltages, currents and
temperatures and shut down equipment if unsafe conditions are detected with monitoring and control
by the Tesla Operations Center. As determined in the Hazards Analysis Report for the Project, the
reasonable worst-case battery cell malfunction scenarios would result in manageable hazards, with
ground-level toxic, thermal and deflagration hazards remaining onsite. Therefore, the maximum
potential public health impacts for the battery facility are considered less than significant. Therefore,
impacts related to reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions would be less than
significant.
c)Less than Significant Impact. The nearest school to the Project site is Grand Terrace High
School, located adjacent to the Project site to the east. However, as mentioned above, the Project
would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
d)No Impact. The Project is not located on a site listed on the state Cortese List, a compilation of
various sites throughout the state that have been compromised due to soil or groundwater
18
contamination from past uses.
Based upon review of the Cortese List, the Project site is not:
listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances
19
Control (DTSC),
listed as a leaking underground storage tank (LUFT) site by the State Water Resources
20
Control Board (SWRCB),
21
listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB,
currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order
22
(CAO) as issued by the SWRCB, or
23
developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.
e)No Impact. The nearest airport to the Project site is the Flabob Airport, located approximately 4.6
24
miles to the southwest. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan. Therefore, no
impact related to airport operations would occur.
f)Less than Significant Impact. Per state Fire and Building Codes, sufficient space will have to be
provided around the proposed energy storage containers for emergency personnel and equipment
access and emergency evacuation. All Project elements, including landscaping, would be sited with
sufficient clearance from existing and proposed structures so as not to interfere with emergency
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
access to and evacuation from the facility. The development will be required to comply with the
74 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 126
C.1.c
Project Description
California Fire Code as adopted by the Grand Terrace Municipal Code (Chapter 15.18.010: Adoption
of the California Fire Code). Access to the site will be provided via a sliding gate and driveway on the
southern side of the Project site and a sliding gate and driveway at the northeast corner of the site.
The driveways have been constructed to California Fire Code specifications and would allow
emergency access and evacuation from the site. Any driveway improvements that occur during
Project development would also be constructed to California Fire Code specifications. The Project
would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan
or evacuation plan because no permanent public street or lane closures are proposed. Construction
work in the street associated with the development would be limited to lateral utility connections and
nominal potential traffic diversion. Project impacts would be less than significant.
g)No Impact. According to the General Plan, the Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone,
25
as identified in Exhibit 5-3 of the Public Health and Safety Element. There are no wildland conditions
in the urbanized area where the Project site is located. No impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 75
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 127
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Violate any water quality standards
or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade
surface or ground water supply?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that
the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the
basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
off-site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
76 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 128
C.1.c
Project Description
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
a)Less than Significant Impact. A project normally would have an impact on surface water quality
if discharges associated with the project would create pollution, contamination, or nuisance as defined
in Water Code
§ 13050, or that cause regulatory standards to be violated as defined in the applicable
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control
Plan for the receiving water body. For the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact could
occur if the proposed energy storage facility would discharge water that does not meet the quality
standards of the agencies that regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater
drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the Project does not comply with all
applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) to reduce potential water quality impacts during construction activity (Grand Terrace
Municipal Code Section 13.20.230) and the implementation of post-construction best management
practices (BMPs) (Grand Terrace Code Section 13.20.250).
Construction Impacts
Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated
with the Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing
pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth-moving activities
which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. All
new development projects equal to one acre or more are subject to San Bernardino County NPDES
Permit No. CAS618036. The proposed BESS facility (including equipment, pavement, and substation)
would disturb approximately 4.8 acres of land and therefore will be subject to NPDES permit
requirements during construction activities. Moreover, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 13.20.230,
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared and submitted for the proposed
development. All construction projects must apply BMPs that include drainage controls such as
detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and downdrains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to
prevent erosion. Compliance with City discharge requirements would ensure that construction of the
energy storage facility would not violate any water quality standards or discharge requirements, or
otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impacts would be less than significant with
implementation of existing regulations.
Operational Impacts
Proposed construction will result in approximately 48 percent impervious surfaces on the Project site.
The Project site will be developed only in those areas where the BESS equipment, pavement, and
substation will be constructed. The remainder of the site will be kept in its current condition, especially
the portions of the site that include the riparian habitat and channels. The Project will include two
separate stormwater detention ponds, one in the north-central portion of the site to the east of the
riparian wetland area, and the second in the west-central portion of the site to the south of the riparian
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
wetland area. Together these two detention ponds will comprise approximately 0.17 acres of the site.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 77
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 129
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
The Project would be subject to post-construction BMPs to address increases in impervious surfaces,
methods to decrease incremental increases in off-site stormwater flows, and methods for decreasing
pollutant loading in off-site discharges. A key design criterion is to treat the first ¾-inch rainstorm
flows, since the first rains typically carry the most concentrated levels of pollution that have built up
since the last storm. Common post-construction BMPs include retaining stormwater on-site to filter
back into the groundwater. Once the proposed Project is constructed approximately 48 percent of the
site will be comprised of impervious surfaces. During operation stormwater will be collected on-site
and diverted to one of the two proposed stormwater detention ponds where it will be treated before
being discharged into the municipal storm drain system in Main Street. In addition, the areas of the
site that would not be converted to impervious surfaces would continue to serve as bio swales for
runoff collection and treatment.
The proposed energy storage facility would not generate hazardous wastewater that would require
any special waste discharge permits. All wastewater associated with the energy storage facility would
be discharged into the local sewer system for treatment at the regional wastewater treatment plant.
Although the amount of impervious surfaces would be greater than existing conditions, runoff would
be captured on site and conveyed through a proposed on-site storm drainage system that includes
water treatment at two detention ponds prior to being discharged into the municipal storm drain at
Main Street. Impacts associated with operation of the proposed energy storage facility would therefore
be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations.
b)Less than Significant Impact. If the Project removes an existing groundwater recharge area or
substantially reduces runoff that results in groundwater recharge such that existing wells would no
longer be able to operate, a potentially significant impact could occur. In general, groundwater does
not occur in this area within 93 to 103 feet of the ground surface. Project-related grading and
trenching would only go a few feet below the surface and would not reach the depth of the
groundwater table. Therefore, no disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed Project
would increase impervious surface coverage on the site to approximately 48 percent. However,
infiltration of irrigation water through soil and water from runoff through the remainder of the site that
will remain pervious would ensure continued groundwater recharge. The Project site is not utilized
specifically for groundwater recharge but will continue to allow infiltration on over half the site.
Because this site is not managed for groundwater supplies and would provide for continued
infiltration, the addition of impervious surfaces on the site would not have a significant effect on the
groundwater table level. Impacts related to development of the proposed energy storage facility would
be less than significant.
c.i) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area could occur if development of the Project results in substantial on- or off-site erosion
or siltation. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to two detention ponds for treatment
and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system in Main Street. Therefore, the drainage
pattern would not be substantially altered in a manner that could cause increases in erosion off-site.
Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be implemented during construction. At the
completion of construction, the site would consist of approximately 48 percent impervious surfaces
while the majority of the site will remain in its natural existing condition or will be landscaped.
Therefore, the site will not be prone to substantial erosion upon completion of construction. There are
two channelized intermittent streams that cross the Project site and feed into the riparian wetland in
the northwestern portion of the site. However, these features will be completely avoided during both
construction and operation and will be left in their existing condition. Therefore, the Project would not
alter any stream course and impacts would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
78 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 130
C.1.c
Project Description
c.ii-iii) Less than Significant Impact. As stated in response 4.10.c.i above, there are two
channelized intermittent streams that cross the Project site and feed into the riparian wetland in the
northwestern portion of the site. However, these features will be completely avoided during both
construction and operation and will be left in their existing condition. Therefore, the Project would not
result in the alteration of any stream course. Additionally, during construction, the Project applicant
would be required to comply with drainage and runoff guidelines pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter
13.20.
With regard to Project operation, construction of the energy storage facility would increase the net
area of impermeable surfaces on the site to approximately 48 percent; therefore, increased
discharges to the City’s existing storm drain system would likely occur. Stormwater associated with
the proposed development would be collected on site and conveyed to two detention ponds for
treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system at Main Street. Permits to connect
to the existing storm drainage system would be obtained prior to construction. All drainage plans are
subject to City review and approval. Therefore, the increase in discharges would not impact local
storm drain capacity. The Project is an industrial use; however, it would not result in substantial
pollutant loading such that treatment control BMPs would be required to protect downstream water
quality. Impacts related to the proposed Project would be less than significant.
c.iv) No Impact. According to flood maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management
26
Agency, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood floodplain. The Project is located in
Zone X, which is an area of minimal flood hazard. Additionally, the General Plan does not identify the
27
Project site is being located in a flood hazard zone. Therefore, the Project will not impede or redirect
flood flows. No impacts will occur.
d)NoImpact. The Project site is not located within a 100-year flood floodplain. The City is not
exposed to tsunami hazards due to its inland location. In addition, no large water bodies that would
pose potential for seiche are in the Project area. The potential for mudflows is unlikely given the site’s
distance from hillside and mountainous terrain. Additionally, according to the County of San
Bernardino General Plan Hazard Overlay map for the area, the Project site is not located within a dam
28
inundation area. No impact would result.
e)Less than Significant Impact. As demonstrated in 4.10a-4.10.d above the Project will not conflict
with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan. A less than significant impact will occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 79
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 131
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.11 – Land Use and Planning
Would the Project:
PotentiallyLess Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificantSignificantImpact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Physically divide an established
community?
b) Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental
effect?
a)No Impact. The Project is surrounded by industrial, commercial, residential, and institutional uses.
The site is currently designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for Industrial and M2 -
Industrial uses, respectively. The proposed project is consistent with these designations and is
consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. The Project does not involve construction of
any roadway, flood control channel, or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the
community. Therefore, no impact would occur.
b)Less than Significant Impact. As described in response 4.4.b, the results of the jurisdictional
delineation concluded there are approximately 0.11 acres (761 linear feet) of non-wetland waters of
the state and waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of ACOE, the RWQCB, and CDFW.
Additionally, there are 1.49 acres (328 linear feet) of riparian waters of the state under the jurisdiction
of the RWQCB and CDFW. In order to avoid permanent loss of waters or functions and values of
waters of the United States, the proposed Project will be constructed in the northeastern and
southwestern corners of the site, and no physical changes to either the concrete channel or shallow
basin will occur as a result of the proposed Project. Avoidance measures will be put in place during
construction and operation to ensure that impacts to these waters do not occur. During construction
activities, construction vehicles, personnel, and equipment will be restricted from accessing these
areas, as will maintenance vehicles and operations personnel during operation of the BESS facility.
Therefore, with avoidance of these features during construction and operation, the Project would not
conflict with state or federal jurisdictional waters protection plans. The Project would maintain the
integrity of the surrounding area in terms of density, use, and design. The Project does not include
any feature that would circumvent any mitigating policies in the Grand Terrace General Plan. Impacts
would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
80 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 132
C.1.c
Project Description
4.12 – Mineral Resources
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
a)No Impact. The Project site is in a partially urbanized area characterized by industrial and
commercial development and some vacant land. According to the California Department of
Conservation Mineral Lands Classification map for the San Bernardino County Production-
Consumption (P-C) Region, the Project site is located within an area designated Mineral Resource
29
Zone 3 (MRZ-3). These are areas where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined.
Additionally, according to the Project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), the Project site
is not located within any known oil or gas field boundary and there are no known producing and/or
abandoned oil wells located within 1,500 feet of the site. Therefore, the Project would not result in the
loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents
of the state and no impact would occur.
b)No Impact. As stated in response 4.12.a above, the Project site is located in an area where the
significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined. Additionally, the Project site is not located
within any known oil or gas field boundary and there are no known producing and/or abandoned oil
wells located within 1,500 feet of the site. Finally, the Grand Terrace General Plan Open Space and
Conservation Element does not identify any locally-important mineral resource recovery sites within
the City boundaries. Therefore, the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally-
important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan and no impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 81
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 133
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.13 – Noise
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the vicinity of
the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the
vicinity of a private airstrip or an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise
levels?
APreliminary Operational Noise Analysis, dated July 14, 2021, was prepared by Dudek for the
proposed Project and is included as Appendix H of this IS/MND. The technical memorandum provides
details regarding potential operational noise levels impacts. This section incorporates the technical
memorandum’s findings, as well as other sources of information to provide context about the
proposed Project’s environmental and regulatory setting (as it pertains to noise and vibration),
estimated project noise levels, and potential noise and vibration impacts. This section also provides
information on the fundamentals of sound production, transmission, and environmental noise analysis.
The Decibel Scale (dB)
The decibel scale (dB) is a unit of measurement that indicates the relative amplitude of a sound.
Sound levels in dB are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 dB represents a tenfold
increase in acoustic energy, while 20 dBs is 100 times more intense, 30 dBs is 1,000 more intense,
and so on. In general, there is a relationship between the subjective noisiness, or loudness of a
sound, and its amplitude, or intensity, with each 10 dB increase in sound level perceived as
approximately a doubling of loudness.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
82 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 134
C.1.c
Project Description
Sound Characterization
There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common method is the “A-weighted
sound level,” or dBA. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human
ear is typically most sensitive. Thus, most environmental measurements are reported in dBA,
meaning decibels on the A-scale.
Human hearing matches the logarithmic A-weighted scale, so that a sound of 60 dBA is perceived as
twice as loud as a sound of 50 dBA. In a quiet environment, an increase of 3 dB is usually perceptible,
however, in a complex noise environment such as along a busy street, a noise increase of less than 3
dB is usually not perceptible, and an increase of 5 dB is usually perceptible. Normal human speech is
in the range from 50 to 65 dBA. Generally, as environmental noise exceeds 50 dBA, it becomes
intrusive and above 65 dBA noise becomes excessive. Nighttime activities, including sleep, are more
sensitive to noise and are considered affected over a range of 40 to 55 dBA. Table 8 (Typical Outdoor
and Indoor Noise Levels) lists typical outdoor and indoor noise levels in terms of dBA.
Table 8
Typical Outdoor and Indoor Noise Levels
Noise Level
Common Outdoor Activities Common Indoor Activities
(dBA)
-110- Rock Band
Jet flyover at 1,000 feet
-100-
Gas lawn mower at 3 feet
-90-
Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet
-80- Garbage disposal at 3 feet
Noise urban area, daytime
Gas lawnmower, 100 feet -70- Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet
Commercial area Normal speech at 3 feet
Heavy traffic at 300 feet -60-
Large business office
Quiet urban daytime -50 Dishwasher next room
Quite urban nighttime Theater, large conference room
-40-
(background)
Quiet suburban nighttime
-30- Library
Quite rural nighttime Bedroom at night
-20-
Broadcast/recording studio
-10-
Lowest threshold of human hearing -0- Lowest threshold of human hearing
Source: Caltrans 2013
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 83
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 135
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Sound levels are typically not steady and can vary over a short time period. The equivalent noise level
(Leq) is used to represent the average character of the sound over a period of time. The Leq
represents the level of steady noise that would have the same acoustical energy as the sum of the
time-varying noise measured over a given time period. Leq is useful for evaluating shorter time
periods over the course of a day. The most common Leq averaging period is hourly, but Leq can
describe any series of noise events over a given time period.
Variable noise levels are values that are exceeded for a portion of the measured time period. Thus,
L01 is the level exceeded one percent of the time and L90 is the level exceeded 90 percent of the
time. The L90 value usually corresponds to the background sound level at the measurement location.
Noise exposure over the course of an entire day is described by the day/night average sound level, or
Ldn, and the community noise equivalent level, or CNEL. Both descriptors represent the 24-hour
noise impact on a community. For Ldn, the 24-hour day is divided into a 15-hour daytime period (7
AM to 10 PM) and a nine-hour nighttime period (10 PM to 7 AM) and a 10 dB “penalty” is added to
measure nighttime noise levels when calculating the 24-hour average noise level. For example, a 45
dBA nighttime sound level would contribute as much to the overall day-night average as a 55 dBA
daytime sound level. The CNEL descriptor is similar to Ldn, except that it includes an additional 5 dBA
penalty beyond the 10 dBA for sound events that occur during the evening time period (7 PM to 10
PM). The artificial penalties imposed during Ldn and CNEL calculations are intended to account for a
receptor’s increased sensitivity to sound levels during quieter nighttime periods.
Sound Propagation
The energy contained in a sound pressure wave dissipates and is absorbed by the surrounding
environment as the sound wave spreads out and travels away from the noise generating source.
Theoretically, the sound level of a point source attenuates, or decreases, by 6 dB with each doubling
of distance from a point source. Sound levels are also affected by certain environmental factors, such
as ground cover (asphalt vs. grass or trees), atmospheric absorption, and attenuation by barriers.
Outdoor noise is also attenuated by the building envelope so that sound levels inside a residence are
from 10 to 20 dB less than outside, depending mainly on whether windows are open for ventilation or
not.
When more than one point source contributes to the sound pressure level at a receiver point, the
overall sound level is determined by combining the contributions of each source. Decibels, however,
are logarithmic units and cannot be directly added or subtracted together. Under the dB scale, a
doubling of sound energy corresponds to a 3 dB increase in noise levels. For example, if one noise
source produces a sound power level of 70 dB, two of the same sources would not produce 140 dB –
rather, they would combine to produce 73 dB.
Under controlled conditions in an acoustical laboratory, the trained, healthy human ear can discern
1 ȃ dB changes in sound levels when exposed to steady, single ȃ frequency (“pure ȃ tone”) signals in the
mid ȃ frequency (1,000–8,000 Hz) range. In typical noisy environments, changes in noise of 1 to 2 dB
are generally not perceptible. However, it is widely accepted that people can begin to detect sound
level increases of 3 dB in typical noisy environments. Further, a 5 ȃ dB increase is generally perceived
as a distinctly noticeable increase, and a 10 ȃ dB increase is generally perceived as a doubling of
loudness.
Noise Effects
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Noise effects on human beings are generally categorized as:
84 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 136
C.1.c
Project Description
Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, and/or dissatisfaction
Interference with activities such speech, sleep, learning, or relaxing
Physiological effects such as startling and haring loss
Most environmental noise levels produce subjective or interference effects; physiological effects are
usually limited to high noise environments such as industrial manufacturing facilities or airports.
Predicting the subjective and interference effects of noise is difficult due to the wide variation in
individual thresholds of annoyance and past experiences with noise; however, an accepted method to
determine a person’s subjective reaction to a new noise source is to compare it to the existing
environment without the noise source, or the “ambient” noise environment. In general, the more a new
noise source exceeds the ambient noise level, the more likely it is to be considered annoying and to
disturb normal activities.
Under controlled conditions in an acoustical laboratory, the trained, healthy human ear is able to
discern 1 ȃ dB changes in sound levels when exposed to steady, single ȃ frequency (“pure ȃ tone”) signals
in the mid ȃ frequency (1,000–8,000 Hz) range. In typical noisy environments, changes in noise of 1 to
2 dB are generally not perceptible. However, it is widely accepted that people are able to begin to
detect sound level increases of 3 dB in typical noisy environments. Further, a 5 dB increase is
generally perceived as a distinctly noticeable increase, and a 10 dB increase is generally perceived as
a doubling of loudness that would almost certainly cause an adverse response from community noise
receptors.
Existing Noise Environment
30
According to the City’s General Plan, transportation noise is the primary source of noise in the City.
The Project site is located in the southwestern portion of the City of Grand Terrace, and is bordered
by Main Street to the south, Taylor Street to the east, the BNSF/Metrolink Inland Empire railroad line
to the west, and the Highgrove Substation to the north. Interstate 215 (I-215) is located approximately
0.2 miles west-northwest of the proposed Project site. The City’s General Plan identifies that
commercial and industrial land uses near the I-215 (such as the proposed Project) are subject to
some of the highest noise levels in the City. Traffic noise modeling conducted for the City’s General
Plan indicates noise levels within 100 feet of the centerline of Main Street, west of Mt. Vernon
Avenue, were 58 CNEL in 2010 and predicted to increase to 71 CNEL by year 2030. Short-term (15-
minute) noise monitoring conducted for the City’s General Plan at Grand Terrace High School
(immediately east of the Project site) recorded noise levels of approximately 59 dBA L. For the
eq
purposes of this analysis, the ambient noise levels at and near the Project site are assumed to be up
to 59 dBA L and 58 CNEL. This assumption is considered conservative since this noise level is
eq
based on 2010 traffic noise modeling and traffic volumes have likely increased along Main Street
since 2010.
Noise Sensitive Receptors
Noise sensitive receptors are buildings or areas where unwanted sound or increases in sound may
have an adverse effect on people or land uses. Residential areas, hospitals, schools, and parks are
examples of noise sensitive receptors that could be sensitive to changes in existing environmental
noise levels. The noise sensitive receptors adjacent or in close proximity to (i.e., within 1,000 feet) of
the perimeter of the proposed Project are limited to:
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 85
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 137
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Single-family residences approximately 540 feet west of the site on Highland Avenue
(within the County of Riverside);
Single-family residences approximately 360 feet east of the site on Sanrive Avenue and
Main Street (within the County of Riverside); and
Student receptors at the Grand Terrace High School, which is located adjacent to the
Project site, across Taylor Street. The nearest school buildings are located approximately
450 feet east of the Project site.
County of Riverside Code of Ordinances
The County of Riverside regulates noise within the county through the enforcement of its Noise
Ordinance, which is contained in Chapter 9.42 of its Ordinance Code. Section 9.52.040 includes
Table 1, which sets forth the maximum noise levels standards (Lmax) for various land uses. Medium-,
and medium-high-density residential development have a daytime (7 AM to 10 PM) standard of 55 dB
Lmax and a nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) standard of 45 dB Lmax.
Section 9.52.020 (Noise Regulation) of the County Ordinance Code establishes that noise associated
with construction activities located within a quarter mile from an inhabited dwelling is considered
exempt from noise level standards of the County Code as long as the construction activities occur
between the hours of 6 AM and 6 PM during the months of June through September, and 7 AM and 6
PM during the months of October through May.
City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code
Title 8 of the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Health and Safety, Chapter 8.108, Noise, sets
forth standards that apply to the proposed Project’s potential construction and operational noise
levels. Relevant standards include (City of Grand Terrace, 2017):
Section 8.108.040, Special Activities. This section sets forth the following noise sources
are exempt from the City’s noise regulations:
o Noise sources associated with or vibration created by construction, repair, or
remodeling or grading of any real property, provided the activities do not take place
between the hours of 8 PM and 7 AM Monday to Saturday, or at any time on
Sunday or a national holiday (Section 8.108.040(C)).
o Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property provided the
activities take place between the hours of 8 AM and 8 PM Monday to Saturday and
9 AM to 8 PM on Sunday (Section 8.108.040(E)).
Section 8.108.050, Prohibited Noise. This section sets for the following noise sources
are prohibited and considered a nuisance:
o Whistles, horns, bells, or other such devices used between 10 PM and 7 AM in
such a manner as to be loud or excessive at a distance of 50 feet from the
equipment being operated.
o Loading or unloading of trucks in a manner that disturbs the peace and quiet of
adjacent residential neighborhoods between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM,
including loading or unloading activities in a manner that is loud and excessive at a
distance of 50 feet from the truck or vehicle being unloaded.
o The operation or use of equipment between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM that
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
produces loud and excessive noise at a distance of 50 feet from the equipment
86 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 138
C.1.c
Project Description
being operated, such as a pile driver, electric hoist, fork lift, or other tools, or the
movement of tractors, tractor trucks, or large trucks on property adjacent to
residences.
Section 18.74.060, Vibration Standards. This section sets forth that land uses in the City
are prohibited from generating vibration of a duration and intensity that is excessive,
disturbing, or objectionable to offsite persons or which interferes with the operations of
equipment and facilities of adjoining parcels.
City of Grand Terrace General Plan
The City of Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element provides guidance for decision-making for
both public and private developments where noise may be a concern and adequate mitigation
measures for noise-related impacts to existing and planned land uses. General Plan Table 6.2
(Interior and Exterior Standards) establishes interior and exterior noise level standards of 45 dB and
65 dB, respectively, for residential and school land uses. General Plan Table 6.3 (Noise/Land Use
Compatibility Matrix) establishes the noise environment for industrial and utility land uses is normally
acceptable up to 70 CNEL, conditionally acceptable above 70 CNEL.
a)Less than Significant Impact.
The Project would generate both short-term construction and long-term operational noise and
vibration. The Project’s potential construction noise and vibration levels were estimated using Caltrans
reference sound levels and standard noise propagation and attenuation equations, while the
operational noise levels were estimated using DataKustik’s CadnaA software. For details related to
the operational noise modeling, see Appendix H. As described in more detail below, the Project would
not generate significant construction or operational noise levels, nor would the land use be
incompatible with the exiting noise environment.
Short-term, Temporary, Construction Noise Levels
Construction activities associated with the proposed Project are anticipated to last approximately 8 to
10 months, and generally involve site preparation, system installation, and testing, commissioning,
and cleanup. These types of construction activities would generate noise and vibration from heavy
equipment operation and vehicle trips and could temporarily increase noise levels at adjacent
properties. Typical noise levels that could be generated by equipment at the site are presented below
in
Table9 (Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels).
In general, construction noise would be loudest during the site preparation phase, which would require
the use of a bulldozer, grader, scrapers, and other equipment (see
Table9). The concurrent operation of a bulldozer, grader, and two scrapers at a distance of 750 feet,
the approximate distance between the southern work area and the nearest residential receptor to the
southwest, would produce a sound level of approximately 63 dBA Leq, which is approximately four (4)
dBA higher than the ambient noise measurement taken at Grand Terrace High School during the
preparation of the City’s General Plan. These same pieces of equipment operating at a distance of
630 feet, the approximate center of the northern work area to the nearest school building, would
produce a sound level of approximately 65 dBA Leq, which is approximately six (6) dBA higher than
the ambient noise measurement taken at Grand Terrace High School during the preparation of the
City’s General Plan. These sound level estimates are considered conservative (i.e., likely to
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
overestimate noise levels), since the operation of specific pieces of off-road equipment would be
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 87
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 139
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
dependent on the task at hand and would likely not need to operate concurrently in the same portion
of the Project site at any one time.
Table 9
Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels
(C)
Predicted Equipment Noise Levels (Leq)
Noise Level Percent
Equipmentat 50 feet Usage
50100200400630750
(A)(B)
(Lmax)Factor
FeetFeetFeetFeetFeetFeet
Backhoe 80 40 76 70 64 58 54 52
Bulldozer 85 40 81 75 69 63 59 57
Crane85 16 77 71 65 59 55 54
Delivery Truck 85 40 81 75 69 63 59 57
Excavator 85 40 81 75 69 63 59 57
Grader85 40 81 75 69 63 59 57
Scraper85 40 81 75 69 63 59 57
Vibratory Roller 80 20 73 67 61 55 51 49
Sources: Caltrans, 2013; FHWA, 2010
(A)L noise levels based on manufacturer’s specifications.
max
(B)Usage factor refers to the amount (percent) of time the equipment produces noise over the time period
(C)Estimate does not account for any atmospheric or ground attenuation factors. Calculated noise levels based on Caltrans,
2009: L (hourly) = L at 50 feet – 20log (D/50) + 10log (UF), where: L = reference L from manufacturer or other
eqmaxmaxmax
source; D = distance of interest; UF = usage fraction or fraction of time period of interest equipment is in use.
Neither the City of Grand Terrace (where the Project is located) nor the County of Riverside (where
single-family homes are located south of Main Street) establish quantitative sound level standards for
construction activities. Rather, construction noise is exempt from noise ordinance requirements, as
long as it occurs in the time frames specified in the City and County Code. As stated in the Project
Description, the Project Applicant anticipates construction activities will generally occur between the
hours of 7 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday, as required to meet the construction schedule. These
proposed hours are within, and are generally more restrictive, than that required by the City or
County. Whereas the City’s Municipal Code does not allow for construction between the hours of 8
PM and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and on Saturdays, and no construction is permitted at any time on
Sunday or a national holiday; in general, the proposed Project would not involve construction on
weekends or past 6 PM. Similarly, whereas the County of Riverside’s Ordinance Code allows
construction to occur on weekends, the Project would generally not involve such work.
The proposed Project would not generate excessive noise during construction activities. Project
construction would occur within the timeframes specified in the City’s and County’s Noise Ordinances;
a four (4) to six (6) dBA increase over existing sound levels may be perceptible at receptor locations,
but it would not be excessive; and the overall duration of construction activities would be less than a
year.
Land Use Compatibility
Table 6.3 (Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix) in the City’s General Plan Noise Element establishes
that the noise environment for industrial and utility land uses is normally acceptable up to 70 CNEL,
conditionally acceptable above 70 CNEL. As described under “Existing Noise Environment”, the
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
proposed Project is located in an area that had an existing noise environment of 58 CNEL in 2010 and
88 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 140
C.1.c
Project Description
was predicted to increase to 71 CNEL by year 2030. The current noise environment at the Project site
is anticipated to currently be somewhere in the low- to mid-60 CNEL range, which would make it
compatible based on the City’s criteria. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not result in the
long-term placement of any receptors at the Project site, other than those who would help service and
maintain the site. Therefore, the Project would not have the potential to place a long-term receptor in
a location that would be incompatible with the ambient noise environment. The Project, therefore,
would be located in a noise environment that is appropriate for its designated use.
Long-term, Operational Noise Levels
Once operational, the proposed Project would generate sound levels from the operation of fans (used
to cool the battery energy storage enclosures) and the operation of medium voltage (MV)
transformers and high voltage (HV) transformers. Using DataKustik’s CadnaA software, which models
three-dimensional outdoor sound propagation based on International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) 9613-2 algorithms and relevant reference data, an operational scenario of the proposed Project
was modeled for purposes of this analysis. Each battery energy storage enclosure was assumed to
have eight cooling fans that operate at 40% capacity, and Project components were assumed to
operate 24 hours a day, 365 days per year. For specific modeling parameters, methodology, and
assumptions, see Appendix H.
As shown in Table 10 (Predicted Sound Pressure Levels at Modeled Receptors), the predicted
aggregate sound emission from a 1-hour-long period of all operating battery energy storage
enclosures, MV transformers, and the HV transformer would be below 55 dBA Leq at the Project site
boundary line. Even if the sound level at the Project property line were 55 dBA Leq, applying a 6.7 dB
addition to the 1-hour average 55 dBA Leq noise level would result in a 61.7 dBA CNEL noise level.
Assuming hourly noise levels were held constant at 55 dBA Leq, a 6.7 dB adjustment factor allows the
hourly noise level to be converted into a 24-hour CNEL measurement. Therefore, the calculated
CNEL noise level would be more than 3 dB below the City’s allowable 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise
level standards for the school land use (i.e., Grand Terrace High School) located to the east of the
Project site (Dudek, 2021). Further, the predicted sound pressure levels at positions across the street
from the south side of the project site and associated with apparent residential uses are anticipated to
be below 44 dBA Leq, which as an amalgam for Lmax on the expected character of “steady-state”
noise emission from the proposed project would also be compliant with the 55 dBA Lmax daytime and
45 dBA Lmax nighttime County standards (Dudek, 2021). Therefore, project operations are not
expected to exceed exterior noise level standards at the residential uses to the south of the project
site. Table 2 provides the predicted sound pressure levels at the modeled receptors (M1–M7)
surrounding the project site.
Table 10
Predicted Sound Pressure Levels at Modeled Receptors
ModeledSound Pressure Level
ReceptorLand Use (dBA L)
eq
M1 Residential 42
M2 Residential 42
M3 Residential 44
M4 Residential 43
M5 Residential 42
M6 School 39
M7 School 46
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Source: Dudek, 2021.
Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels; L = energy-equivalent level
eq
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 89
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 141
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
It should be noted that the predicted operational noise emissions estimated in Table 10 does include
the partial noise-occluding effect of a solid, 9-foot-tall decorative block wall along the eastern and
southern sides of the proposed Project, which adjoin Taylor Street and West Main Street,
respectively. However, the influence of the decorative wall on the predicted values for modeled
receptors M1–M7 (as shown in Table 10) is negligible for reasons including the following: (1) the
noise-generating fans on the anticipated battery enclosures are located relatively high on the
equipment surfaces, (2) an access gate breaks wall solidity on the southern side parallel with West
Main Street, and (3) the position of the wall on the eastern side (Taylor Street) is distant from the
noise-emitting sources on site. In other words, the decorative wall could instead be acoustically
porous (or nonexistent) and have little or no effect on the predicted sound levels at the nearest off-site
noise-sensitive receptors.
Conclusion
As discussed above, construction activities would be short in duration (i.e., less than a year), occur in
the timeframes outlined in the City’s and County’s Noise Ordinances, and result in excessive noise
levels at adjacent receptor locations. Furthermore, the Project’s proposed use would be consistent
with its existing noise environment, and would not result in operational noise levels that exceed City or
County standards. This impact would be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact.
Vibration is the movement of particles within a medium or object such as the ground or a building. As
is the case with airborne sound, groundborne vibrations may be described by amplitude and
frequency. Vibration amplitudes are usually expressed in peak particle velocity (PPV) or root mean
squared, in inches per second (in/sec). PPV represents the maximum instantaneous positive or
negative peak of a vibration signal and is most appropriate for evaluating the potential for building
damage. Human response to groundborne vibration is subjective and varies from person to person.
Caltrans’ Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual provides a summary of
vibration criteria that have been reported by researchers, organizations, and governmental agencies
(Caltrans, 2018). Chapters six and seven of this manual summarize vibration detection and
annoyance criteria from various agencies and provide criteria for evaluating potential vibration impacts
on buildings and humans from transportation and construction projects. These criteria are
summarized in Table 11 (Caltrans’ Vibration Criteria for Building Damage) and Table 12(Caltrans’
Vibration Criteria for Human Response).
Table 11
Caltrans’ Vibration Criteria for Building Damage
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Structural Integrity
Transient Continuous
Historic and some older buildings 0.50 0.25
Older residential structures 0.50 0.30
New residential structures 1.00 0.50
Modern industrial and commercial structures 2.00 0.50
Source:Caltrans 2020
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
90 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 142
C.1.c
Project Description
Table 12
Caltrans’ Vibration Criteria for Human Response
PPV Threshold (in/sec)
Human Response
Transient Continuous
Slightly perceptible 0.0350.012
Distinctly perceptible 0.240.035
Strongly perceptible 0.900.10
Severe/disturbing 2.00 0.10
Very disturbing --0.40
Source: Caltrans, 2020
Development of the proposed project would not require rock blasting, or pile driving, but could require
use a vibratory roller and bulldozer. Construction activities that use vibratory rollers and bulldozers
would be mobile and not operating at the same location for a prolonged period of time; therefore, the
transientcriteria is used. The nearest land uses in proximity of the Project site is an industrial building
approximately 100 feet south of the site.
To evaluate potential impacts, the Modern Industrial and Commercial Structures criteria is used. As
shown in Table 13, the operation of a vibratory roller could generate groundborne vibration of
approximately 0.046 in/sec PPV at a distance of 100 feet. Based on the criteria summarized in Table
11, this would not cause damage to any structures.
Table 13
Groundborne Vibration Estimates
Reference PPV Estimated PPV
Estimated Lv at
Reference Lv at
Equipmentat 25 feet at 100 feet
25 feet (dBV)100 feet (dBV)
(inches/second)(inches/second)
Vibratory roller 0.21094.00.04675.9
Large bulldozer 0.08987.00.01968.9
Small bulldozer 0.00358.00.00739.9
Loaded truck 0.07686.00.01767.9
Jackhammer 0.03579.00.00860.9
Source: Caltrans, 2020, FTA, 2006.
Notes: Estimated PPV calculated as: PPV(D)= PPVref*(25/D)^1.1 where PPV(D)= Estimated PPV @ Distance, PPVref=Reference
PPV @ 25 feet, D=Distance from equipment to receiver, and 1.1=ground attenuation rate
Estimated Lv calculated as: Lv(D)=Lv(25 feet)-30log(D/25) where Lv(D)=velocity level in decibels, and v=RMS velocity amplitude @
25 feet
Although some construction activities may generate groundborne vibration that is barely perceptible,
this impact would be less than significant for a number of reasons. First, equipment that have the
potential to generate groundborne vibration would be mobile, meaning that they would not operate at
the same location and expose a potential receptor to vibration for a prolonged amount of time.
Second, equipment is unlikely to operate near the property boundary on a frequent basis. Instead, the
equipment would likely be used on the interior of the site where the majority of development would
occur. Finally, equipment operation that could generate groundborne vibration would be short-term,
since most activities that would have the potential to generate perceptible groundborne vibration
would occur site preparation, which is only anticipated to last a few months. As such, the proposed
project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. This impact
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
would be less than significant.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 91
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 143
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
c)Less than Significant Impact. The closest public or private airport to the proposed Project site is
Flabob Airport, a small public-use airport, located approximately 4.7 miles southwest of the Project
site. The next nearest airport, San Bernardino International Airport, is located approximately 6.4 miles
northeast of the Project site. The City’s General Plan Noise Element indicates the City is not located
within an airport noise-impacted area associated with San Bernardino International Airport.
Furthermore, the Project would not result in the long-term placement of receptors at the site; the only
receptors at the site would be there for service and maintenance. The proposed Project, therefore,
would not expose workers to excessive airport-related noise levels.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
92 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 144
C.1.c
Project Description
4.14 – Population and Housing
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing people or housing,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
a)No Impact. The proposed Project would not require any regularly employed staff for the operation
of the facility. The only operations at the facility would be sporadic maintenance visits. Therefore, the
proposed Project would not be expected to generate any new employment or induce any population
growth in the City or region and no impact would occur.
b)No Impact. Displacement, in the context of housing, can generally be defined as persons or
groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of
31
habitual residence. The proposed Project would occur on an undeveloped piece of land that does
not contain any housing. Therefore, the Project would not result in the displacement of any existing
people or housing and no impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 93
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 145
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.15 – Public Services
Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
a) Less than Significant Impact. The City of Grand Terrace contracts with San Bernardino County
Fire for fire and rescue services. The City of Grand Terrace is serviced by Fire Station 23. Fire Station
23 consists of both paid and volunteer staffing. The proposed Project consists of an energy storage
facility to be constructed on a vacant parcel. All facilities would be constructed to current applicable
code requirements using materials that would minimize potential fire related issues. The Project would
not spur the growth of the region in an unplanned manner that would place unexpected future
demands on existing fire services. As such, it would not require the building of new fire protection
related buildings or structures and there would be a less than significant impact related to fire
protection services.
b)Less than Significant Impact. The City of Grand Terrace contracts with the San Bernardino
County Sheriff-Coroner Department to provide for the police protection services. The Project would
occur on one parcel and the property will have a security fence around it to secure the facility. No
other increased demands for security would occur as a result of the proposed Project. The Project
would not result in increased demand for police services and subsequently not result in the provision
of new or expanded police facilities. The Project is not anticipated to increase response times to the
Project site or surrounding area as operation of the Project will not require any full-time on-site
employees. As required for a development of this type, the Project is subject to a law enforcement
Development Impact Fee as imposed by the City of Grand Terrace. The Project does not propose or
require new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant.
c)No Impact. The Project is a non-residential land use. The proposed Project includes the
construction and operation of an energy storage facility on a vacant parcel. The proposed Project
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
would not directly impact area schools, nor would it result in increased demand for additional schools
94 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 146
C.1.c
Project Description
as there would be no increase of population. The Project would not require the construction or
expansion of schools or education related facilities. There would be no impact to schools as a result of
the proposed Project.
d)No Impact. The City has established park impact fees to offset the costs associated with increased
maintenance and the addition of park facilities resulting from new development. The City’s park
impact fees are generated based on the number of residential units in either subdivision or non-
subdivision developments. The proposed Project includes the construction of an energy storage
facility on a vacant parcel. The proposed Project would not directly impact existing parks and would
not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. Therefore, no
impact would occur.
e)No Impact. The City requires that certain types of development pay impact fees to compensate for
additional services provided by public facilities as a result of implementation of their project. The City
of Grand Terrace requires development impact fees for libraries; however, the Project would not be
subject to these impact fees as they are based on the number of residential units proposed by a given
development. The Project does not include residential uses and would not result in a direct increase in
population within the City or surrounding area. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities would
occur with Project implementation and no mitigation is required.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 95
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 147
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4.16 – Recreation
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Would the Project increase the use
of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the Project include recreational
facilities or require the construction
or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
a)No Impact. The Project does not include development of any residences that could directly
generate increased demand for parks and recreational facilities. Implementation of the Project would
not generate an increase in demand on existing public or private parks or other recreational facilities
that would either result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. Furthermore, as the Project
does not include residential uses, the Project would not be subject to a park impact fee. Therefore, no
impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required.
b)No Impact. As previously addressed, the Project does not include residential development and
would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. The
Project does not include recreational facilities, nor would it require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
96 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 148
C.1.c
Project Description
4.17 – Transportation
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificant with SignificantImpact
Impact MitigationImpact
Incorporated
a) Conflict with a program plan,
ordinance or policy addressing the
circulation system including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
a)Less than Significant Impact. There would be an increase in traffic during construction of the
proposed Project; however, this increase would be temporary and would cease upon conclusion of
construction. Operation of the facility would include occasional maintenance and landscaping trips to
and from the site; however, there would be no full-time on-site employees during operation. The
increase in both construction and operational traffic is considered a less than significant impact. Also,
construction and operation of the proposed Project would not have an impact on the local transit
system, bicycle facilities, or pedestrian facilities. The proposed Project does not include changes to
roadways or design features that would conflict with the performance or safety of alternative
transportation facilities. Therefore, impacts will be less than significant.
b) Less than Significant Impact. As stated in response 4.17.a, operation of the facility would
include occasional maintenance and landscaping trips to and from the site but would not include any
full-time on-site employees during operation. Therefore, the proposed Project will not generate
excessive vehicles miles traveled (VMT) in the Project vicinity or region and would not conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). Less than significant impacts
associated with VMT would occur as a result of the proposed Project.
c) Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not involve any unusual conditions or hazardous
design features, such as sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses. Access to the
site will be provided via a driveway on Main Street and a driveway on Taylor Street and internal
circulation will be restricted to a single direction. The design of the Project would comply with all
applicable City and state regulations regarding minimum clearances. Furthermore, the Project does not
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
involve changes in the alignment of Main Street or Taylor Street and the proposed energy storage
facility is consistent with existing uses in the area. The Project would not result in a traffic safety hazard
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 97
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 149
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
due to any design features or incompatible uses. Less than significant impacts would occur with
adherence to existing regulations.
d) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the design of the Project would
not satisfy emergency access requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department or in any
other way threaten the ability of emergency vehicles to access and serve the Project site or adjacent
uses. The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. As discussed above, access to
the site will be provided via a driveway on Main Street and a driveway on Taylor Street and internal
circulation will be restricted to a single direction. The driveway width is sufficient to provide access to
fire and emergency vehicles and is consistent with the California Fire Code requiring a minimum of 20
feet paved width. All access features are subject to and must satisfy the City of Grand Terrace design
requirements, including the County Fire Department’s requirements. This Project would result in less
than significant impacts with regard to emergency access.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
98 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 150
C.1.c
Project Description
4.18 – Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a Cultural Native American tribe, and
that is:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificantSignificantImpact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
a)Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in response 4.5.a, the Project site is the former site
of the abandoned Cage Park, which was a landscaped feature of the Highgrove Steam Plant located
immediately to the north of the site. The Highgrove Steam Plant was constructed between 1951 and
1955, making it more than 50 years old. In order to determine whether the proposed Project has the
potential to impact historical resources under CEQA, the Highgrove Steam Plant was evaluated as a
whole in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) designation criteria and
integrity requirements. A detailed physical description of the Highgrove Steam Plant and a complete
set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 forms (DPR forms) is
provided in Appendix B of the Historic Resource Evaluation Report. The Highgrove Steam Plant
property includes nine components, comprising six buildings, three structures, and three areas of
foundations. Surrounding the property is a chain-link fence with an additional chain-link fence in the
center dividing the property in two. Cage Park can be accessed from a gate along the southern
boundary of the project site off West Main Street, and the Highgrove Steam Plant is accessed on the
east from Taylor Street via a paved driveway. Open grass spaces are located to the south and north
of the Highgrove Steam Plant. At the southern end of the property is a series of concrete-lined canals
running northeast to southwest, terminating at the southeastern corner of the Project site. Multiple
overgrown paths of circulation meander throughout the Project site, and a dried-up lake filled with
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
overgrown trees is in the northwest portion of APN 1167-151-77. Multiple metal light posts are located
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 99
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 151
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
at the southern end of the Project site. According to the Historic Resource Evaluation Report, the
Highgrove Steam Plant is not eligible under any CRHR designation criteria at the individual level due
to a lack of the requisite integrity necessary to convey significant historical associations and a lack of
architectural merit.As a result of the evaluation, the Highgrove Steam Plant is recommended not
eligible as a historical resource under CEQA. No other historical resources were identified during field
surveys of the Project site or record searches covering the project site. Historical resources with
cultural value to a Cultural Native American tribe were not identified within the Project Site. Impacts
would be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact. Assembly Bill (AB) 52 specifies that a project that may cause a
substantial adverse change to a defined Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) may result in a significant
effect on the environment. AB 52 requires tribes interested in development Projects within a
traditionally and culturally affiliated geographic area to notify a lead agency of such interest and to
request notification of future Projects subject to CEQA prior to determining if a negative declaration,
mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. The lead
agency is then required to notify the tribe within 14 days of deeming a development application
subject to CEQA complete to notify the requesting tribe as an invitation to consult on the Project. AB
52 identifies examples of mitigation measures that will avoid or minimize impacts to TCR. The bill
makes the above provisions applicable to Projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of
intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative declaration circulated on or after July 1,
2015. AB 52 amends Sections 5097.94 and adds Sections 21073, 21074, 2108.3.1., 21080.3.2,
21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3 to the California Public Resources Code (PRC), relating to
Native Americans.
The following tribes are listed by the NAHC as having traditional lands or cultural places within the
County of San Bernardino:
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians;
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation;
Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation;
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians;
Morongo Band of Mission Indians; and
Serrano Nation of Mission Indians.
The City sent a request to the NAHC to search their Sacred Land Files (SLF) to ascertain whether
their files contained any new information relating to the presence of Native American cultural
resources within the Project area generally and on the Project site specifically. A response letter was
received indicating the absence of documentation of tribal resources in the Project area or on the
Project site. However, the absence of documentation in the SLF does not indicate the absence of
Native American cultural resources within the Project. As such, in accordance with Assembly Bill 52
(AB 52), which added various provisions to the California Public Resources Code (PRC) that concern
Tribal Cultural Resources, including Section 21080.3.1(d), the City contacted local tribes requesting to
be notified of Projects. No Tribal responses were received during the AB 52 consultation period.
Moreover,a review of City and cultural records indicate that there are no TCRs or archaeological
resources relating to TCRs (prehistoric and historic) located within the Project’s boundaries or in the
vicinity of the Project Area. The Project Site has been highly disturbed by modern human activities
that would have displaced surface and subsurface archaeological resources relating to
TCRs. Therefore, the Project will not impact TCRs or archaeological resources relating to TCRs.
Impacts will be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
100 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 152
C.1.c
Project Description
4.19 – Utilities and Service Systems
Would the Project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificantSignificantImpact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded
water, wastewater treatment or storm
water drainage, electric power,
natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the Project and
reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the Project that
it has adequate capacity to serve the
Project’s Projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of
State or local standards, or in excess
of the capacity of local infrastructure,
or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes
and regulations related to solid
waste?
a)Less than Significant Impact. The Project would require water, wastewater collection and
treatment, storm water drainage, electrical power, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities. An
analysis of impacts is provided below.
Water Supplies
Grand Terrace residents and businesses are served by the Riverside-Highland Water Company
(RHWC). RHWC’s service area lies partially within the Valley District service area and partially within
the service area of Western Municipal Water District (Western). According to the 2015 San
Bernardino Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (WQMP), RHWC’s customers include
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
single and multi-family residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural users. RHWC obtains water
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 101
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 153
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
from the Lytle Creek Sub-basin, the SBBA, the Rialto-Colton Sub-basin, Riverside North and
Riverside South Basins. The service area is nearing about 85% built-out with the developments
currently under construction or approved by the planning departments of the governing agencies. The
32
major population center in the service area is the City of Grand Terrace. The water supply for
RHWC is from five separate groundwater basins. In addition, RHWC has entered into an agreement
with Valley District for a maximum of 1,000 gallons per minute of water from the District’s Base Line
Feeder project. RHWC has 13 wells constructed in the groundwater basins of which eight wells
produce potable water for domestic use, two wells which produce non-potable water at this time for
irrigation purposes (reason for non-potable classification is nitrate which is in excess of State Drinking
Water Standards), and three wells dedicated to pump water from the Bunker Hill Basin to lower the
groundwater due to encroachment of the water into structures. As the need arises, RHWC will
construct new wells and place them in service as future projections show the need.
The UWMP is based on area population projections as provided by SCAG. The proposed Project is
consistent with SCAG Projections for the service area because it will not generate any new
employment or direct or indirect population growth in the area. Project construction and operation will
require a nominal amount of water and the increase in water use would be within the anticipated
increase in the UWMP. In addition, operation of the proposed energy storage facility would not require
the provision of any municipal water supplies. As the Project does not include the construction of
33
dwelling units, no Water Supply Assessment (WSA) is required. Water use within the City includes
domestic, commercial, industrial, and landscape irrigation. Most connections within the City’s service
area, including landscaped areas and City parks, are metered. Based on the fact that the proposed
Project will require a nominal amount municipal water supply during operation, it can be assumed that
water demand from the development will not exceed the City’s annual water demand and would not
require the relocation or construction of new or expanded water supply facilities. Therefore, impacts
will be less than significant.
Wastewater
The local wastewater treatment system is designed to comply with federal regulations (National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System, NPDES) administered by the RWRCB. Moreover, the
proposed Project is anticipated to generate nominal wastewater during normal operations and
periodic maintenance activities, mostly as a result of landscape irrigation. Therefore, the proposed
Project would not result of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities and would have a less
than significant impact.
Stormwater
At Project completion the site would be comprised of mostly pervious surfaces with nominal new
impervious surfaces. As discussed in the Hydrology section of this document, stormwater associated
with the new impervious surfaces associated with the proposed development would be collected on
site and conveyed to detention ponds for treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage
system at Main Street. Implementation of BMPs would reduce pollutants in stormwater and urban
runoff from the Project site. The proposed storm drainage system and BMPs must be designed to the
satisfaction of the City’s Public Works Director and in conformance with all applicable permits and
regulations. The Project applicant/developer would be required to provide all necessary on-site
infrastructure. No mitigation beyond compliance with existing regulations is required. The proposed
Project would therefore not require the construction of new facilities or expansion of existing storm
drainage facilities.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
102 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 154
C.1.c
Project Description
Electric Power
The Project represents an improvement to the existing electrical power system. Although the Project
would require new electrical line tie ins for service, it would not result in the excessive use of electricity
during operation. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact.
Natural Gas
The Project would not require new natural gas services connections, and would not result in the need
for new natural gas supplies or infrastructure. Therefore, the Project would have no impact with regard
to natural gas.
Telecommunication Facilities
The proposed Project would require specialized telecommunication facilities to meet the
communication requirements for interconnecting with the SCE facilities and to support remote Project
operations monitoring. To provide for communication with SCE facilities, a fiber-optic cable would be
placed along the line connecting the Project site generation step-up (GSU) transformer with the SCE
point of interconnection. Utility interconnection regulations require the installation of a second,
separate, redundant fiber-optic cable. The redundant fiber-optic cable would also be installed within
the Project footprint. The Project would use local exchange carrier services for telecommunication to
support remote monitoring requirements. The Project would connect to telecommunication fiber-optic
lines owned and managed by local telecommunication providers. The cabinet holding the connection
equipment would have a base of approximately 4 feet by 2 feet and would be approximately 5 feet in
height. From the point of demarcation, a fiber-optic cable would be installed within the Project footprint
to connect the cabinet to the SCADA equipment. The SCADA system is critical to the CAISO and
SCE utility interconnection, and for the proper operation and maintenance of the Project. The SCADA
system uses proprietary software; a fiber-optic transmission system; a telephone, radio, and/or
microwave communication network; and other means of communication such as radio links and
phase loop communication systems. The SCADA system functions as a remote start, stop, reset, and
tag out for the facility, thus minimizing the labor and site diagnostic information generated from the
panels. The SCADA system would also control the substations, allowing for fully centralized operation
of the project to meet all CAISO and utility interconnection requirements. However, no new or
expanded telecommunications facilities will be required as a result of construction and operation of
the proposed Project. Impacts will be less than significant.
For the above reasons, the Project is not anticipated to require relocation or construction of new or
expanded water, wastewater treatment, storm drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities and impacts would be less than significant.
b)Less than Significant Impact.As discussed in response 4.19.a above, the Project is not
anticipated to significantly increase water demand and will be within the estimated increase in water
demand for the RHWC. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for RHWC, there is
sufficient supply to accommodate demand under normal and single- and multiple-dry year conditions
utilizing imported water. Local supplies would supplement imported supplies and provide additional
supply reliability. The UWMP is based on area population Projections as provided by SCAG. The
Project is consistent with SCAG Projections for the service area because it will not generate any new
employment or population in the area. As the estimated increase in water use is within the anticipated
increase in the UWMP and the Project is consistent with regional population Projections, impacts
would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 103
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 155
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
c)Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in response 4.19.a above, the local wastewater
treatment system is designed to comply with federal regulations (National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System, NPDES) administered by the RWRCB. Moreover, the proposed Project is
anticipated to generate nominal wastewater during normal operations and periodic maintenance
activities. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result of new or expanded wastewater treatment
facilities and would have a less than significant impact.
Connections to local water and sewer mains would involve temporary and less than significant
construction impacts that would occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. The Project site
is located within the existing service area of RHWC and the City of Grand Terrace and is surrounded
by existing development that is currently connected to existing water and wastewater lines. No
additional improvements are needed to either water lines, sewer lines, or treatment facilities to serve
the Project. Standard connection fees would address any incremental impacts of the Project.
Therefore, the Project would result in less than significant impacts with regard to the need for new or
expanded wastewater treatment facilities.
d)Less than Significant Impact. Significant impacts could occur if the Project generate solid waste
in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. The City of Grand Terrace has a trash and
recycling service contract provided by Burrtec Waste Industries. Solid waste generated in the City is
transferred to Burrtec’s West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Solid waste that is not
diverted is primarily disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, a County Class III (i.e., municipal waste) landfill
located at 2390 North Alder Avenue in Rialto (Ceballos 2009). Mid Valley Landfill has a daily
permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tons/day), a remaining capacity of 670,000 cubic yards (cy),
and an anticipated close date of 2033 (2010 General Plan Update). Landfill capacity is expected to
decrease over time with future growth and development throughout San Bernardino County and
surrounding Inland Empire areas. Waste reduction and recycling programs and regulations are
expected to reduce this demand and extend the life of existing landfills. Development of the proposed
Project would result in a nominal net increase in solid waste disposal per year. This nominal
incremental increase in solid waste disposal, assuming that all solid waste in the City would be
disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, would not be considered cumulatively considerable. Compliance with
County waste reduction programs and policies would also reduce the volume of solid waste entering
landfills. Individual development projects within the County would be required to comply with
applicable state and local regulations, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50
percent. Therefore, impacts related to the Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is
required.
e)Less than Significant Impact. The Project is required to comply with all applicable federal, state,
County, and City statutes and regulations related to solid waste as a standard Project condition of
approval. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
104 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 156
C.1.c
Project Description
4.20 – Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificantSignificantImpact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of wildfire?
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities), that
may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
a)No Impact. The majority of Grand Terrace is urbanized, including the Project area. The Project
site is not located within a fire hazard zone, as identified on the latest Fire Hazard Severity Zone
34
(FHSZ) maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) The
Project site is also not identified in the City’s General Plan Health and Safety Element as being
35
located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Finally, the Project site is not located in a State
36
Responsibility Area (SRA). Therefore, the Project would not impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur.
b)No Impact. As discussed in response 4.20.a. above, the Project Site is not located within or near
any State Responsibility Areas or Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project site is relatively flat and is
surrounded on three sides by development. No impact would occur.
c)No Impact. As discussed in response 4.20.a. above, the Project Site is not located within or near
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
any State Responsibility Areas or Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project would not exacerbate fire
risk or result in a temporary or ongoing impact from wildfires. No impact would occur.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 105
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 157
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
d)No Impact. As discussed in response 4.20.a. above, the Project Site is not located within or near
any State Responsibility Areas or Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project does not propose any
residential uses and would not include any full-time on-site employees. As a result, the Project would
not expose people or structures to significant risk due to runoff, post-fire slope instability or drainage
changes. No impact would occur.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
106 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 158
C.1.c
Project Description
4.21 – Mandatory Findings of Significance
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
SignificantSignificantSignificantImpact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Does the Project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the Project have impacts that
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
c) Does the Project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
a) Less than Significant. The Project site is located within a developed area with no natural habitat.
The Project would not significantly impact any sensitive plants, plant communities, fish, wildlife or
habitat for any sensitive species. Impacts to burrowing owl or migratory birds will be less than
significant with mitigation incorporated. Adverse impacts to historic resources would not occur. The
site is not known to have any association with an important example of California’s history or
prehistory. Based on the preceding analysis of potential impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru
4.20, no evidence is presented that this Project would degrade the quality of the environment. Impacts
related to degradation of the environment, biological resources, and cultural resources would be less
than significant.
b)Less than Significant The Project would result in significant impacts in the following areas:
/migratory/nesting birds, archaeological resources, buried human remains, and paleontological
resources. All other impacts of the Project were determined either to have no impact or to be less than
significant, without the need for mitigation. Cumulatively, the Project would not result in any significant
impacts that would substantially combine with impacts of other current or probable future impacts.
Therefore, the Project, in conjunction with other future projects, would not result in any cumulatively
considerable impacts.
c)Less than Significant . Based on the analysis of the Project’s impacts in the responses to items
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4.1 thru 4.20, there is no indication that the proposed energy storage facility could result in substantial
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 107
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 159
C.1.c
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of temporary adverse effects during
construction related these would cease to persist upon Project completion. Environmental effects
would result in less than significant impacts. Based on the analysis in this Initial Study, the City finds
that direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
108 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 160
C.1.c
5 Mitigation Summary
BIO-1 Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey. A burrowing owl pre-construction survey
shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the initiation of ground disturbance
activities, and a second survey shall be conducted within 24 hours prior to ground
disturbance. Pre-construction surveys should be conducted by a qualified biologist. If
surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat is located within the impact footprint or
within 500 feet of the impact footprint, avoidance measures shall be implemented
consistent with the requirements of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and in
coordination with the City of Grand Terrace and CDFW.
BIO-2: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the
nesting season (typically January 1 to September 15), then a focused survey for active
nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of
academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource
management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related
activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing,
grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work
areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For
passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius
surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as
those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys
shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of
possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-
related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required
before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction
survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to
continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions
specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the
qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a
nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction
activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500
feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project
Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring
directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-
work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active
due to natural causes (e.g., young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic
nest failure).
CUL-1: Conduct Archaeological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The
Applicant shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist who meets U.S. Secretary of
the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct an Archaeological
Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation
activities. The training session shall be carried out by a cultural resource professional with
expertise in archaeology, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on
how to identify archaeological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving
activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of archaeological
monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional archaeologist would follow in
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 109
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 161
C.1.c
Mitigation Summary
CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Archeological Resources Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-
Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist, who
meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to
conduct periodic Archaeological Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to
determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing
archaeological resources. After the initial Archaeological Spot Check, further periodic
checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist. If the qualified
archaeologist determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high
probability of exposing archaeological artifacts, construction monitoring for archaeological
resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor,
who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets
the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications
and Standards. The archaeological monitor shall be present during all construction
excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill younger
Pleistocene alluvial sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require
multiple archaeological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of
excavation and grading activities, proximity to known archaeological resources, the
materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if
found, the abundance and type of archaeological resources encountered. Full-time
monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project
archaeologist.
CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Archaeological
Resources Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed
during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted
away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least
100 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be
allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the newly discovered
artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside
of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities
shall be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist, who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered
artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be
contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated.
The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate
treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological
data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent
laboratory processing and analysis.
CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The archaeological monitor,
under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at
the conclusion of archaeological monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to
the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of
other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the
Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of
resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California
Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
110 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 162
C.1.c
Mitigation Summary
CUL-5: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Notify County Coroner If Human Remains
Are Encountered. If human remains are unearthed during implementation of the Project,
the City of Commerce and the Applicant shall comply with State Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5. The City of Commerce and the Applicant shall immediately notify the
County Coroner and no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made
the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. If the
remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to
notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then identify
the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). After the MLD has
inspected the remains and the site, they have 48 hours to recommend to the landowner
the treatment and/or disposal, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any
associated funerary objects. Upon the reburial of the human remains, the MLD shall file a
record of the reburial with the NAHC and the Project archaeologist shall file a record of the
reburial with the CHRIS-SCCIC. If the NAHC is unable to identify a MLD, or the MLD
identified fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation of
the MLD and the mediation provided for in Subdivision (k) of Section 5097.94, if invoked,
fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner or his or her
authorized representative shall inter the human remains and items associated with Native
American human remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject
to further and future subsurface disturbance.
GEO-1:Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The
Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth
by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity
Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The
training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources
that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed
in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures
to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional
paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
GEO-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving
activities.The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the
qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic
Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if
construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial
Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of
the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction
excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for
Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified
paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional
paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction
excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene
alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple
paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of
excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or
unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils),
and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological
resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 111
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 163
C.1.c
Mitigation Summary
reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional
paleontologist.
GEO-3:Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if
Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological
resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing
activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of
the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be
established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue
until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and
the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and
City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set
forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan
for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage
excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and
analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce
construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock
samples for initial processing.
GEO-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the
above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the
results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as
well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be
submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County,
and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory
completion of the Project and required mitigation measures.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
112 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 164
C.1.c
6 References
6.1 – List of Preparers
City of Grand Terrace (Lead Agency)
Planning and Development Services Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, California 92313
909-824-6621
Steven A. Weiss, AICP, Director of Planning and Development Services
Haide Aguirre, Associate Planner
MIG (Environmental Analysis)
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110
Riverside, California 92507
951-787-9222
Pamela Steele, Principal
Bob Prasse, Director of Environmental Services
Chris Dugan, Director of Air Quality, GHG, and Noise Services
Phillip Gleason, Senior Environmental Analyst
Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst
Dudek (Archaeological Resources)
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
626-204-9800
Linda Kry, BA, RA
Heather McDaniel McDevitt, MA, RPA
Dudek (Historic Resources)
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
626-204-9800
Nicole Frank, MSHP
Samantha Murray, MA
Dudek (Biological Resources)
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
626-204-9800
David Hochart, Senior PM
Bradley Cole, PM
Anna Cassidy, PM
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 113
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 165
C.1.c
References
Dudek (Noise)
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
626-204-9800
David Ortega, ETG Associate & Analyst
Mark Storm, INCE, Bd. Cert.
Alta Environmental DBA NV5 (Phase I ESA)
3777 Long Beach Blvd., Annex Building
Long Beach California 90807
562-495-5777
Eric Fraske, PE, SE
Bryan Stone, VP, Senior Technical Reviewer
6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted
None
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
114 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 166
C.1.c
References
6.3 – Bibliography
1
City of Grand Terrace. General Plan Update/Program EIR. Page 39. January, 2010.
2
California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: San
Bernardino County. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-
community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways \[Accessed May 2021\].
3
California Public Utilities Commission. General Order 95 (GO-95), Rule No. 37, Table 1, Case No.
3.https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/gos/GO95/go_95_rule_37.html. \[Accessed October 2021\].
4
California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
5
California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program.
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/SanBernardino.aspx \[Accessed June 2021\].
6
SCAQMD (2016a). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air
Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. February 2016.
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/naaqs-
caaqs-feb2016.pdf?sfvrsn=14.\[Accessed June 2021\]
7
CARB. (2016b) Ambient Air Quality Standards. Sacramento, CA. Web:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. \[Accessed June 2021\].
8
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. NCCP Plan Summaries.
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans \[Accessed June 2021\].
9
City of Grand Terrace. City of Grand Terrace General Plan Open Space and Conservation
Element. April 27, 2010.
10
California Air Resources Board. Climate Change Scoping Plan.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/cleanenergy/clean_fs2.htm \[Accessed June 2021\].
11
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Chapter 5,
Page V-2.
12
California Department of Conservation. CGS Information Warehouse: Regulatory Maps.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/regulatorymaps/ \[Accessed June
2021\].
13
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Chapter 5,
Page V-1 - V-2.
14
San Bernardino County: Land Use Services. Geologic Hazard Overlay maps.
http://cms.sbcounty.gov/lus/Planning/ZoningOverlayMaps/GeologicHazardMaps.aspx \[Accessed
June 2021\].
15
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Chapter 5,
Page V4.
16
San Bernardino County: Land Use Services. Geologic Hazard Overlay maps.
http://cms.sbcounty.gov/lus/Planning/ZoningOverlayMaps/GeologicHazardMaps.aspx \[Accessed
June 2021\].
17
State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
\[Accessed June 2021\].
18
California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources.
http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
19
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances
Site List – Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
\[Accessed June 2021\].
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project (13631.02) 115
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 167
C.1.c
References
20
California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker.
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
21
California State Water Resources Control Board. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above
Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit.
http://www.calepa.ca.gov/files/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList-CurrentList.pdf \[Accessed June
2021\].
22
California State Water Resources Control Board. List of Active CDO and CAO.
http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
23
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a).
https://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962-5a/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
24
Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Data and Contact Information.
http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/ \[Accessed June 2021\].
25
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Exhibit
5.3: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Chapter 5, Page V-12.
26
Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number
06071C8689H. August 28, 2008.
27
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Exhibit
5.2: Flood Hazards. Chapter 5, Page V-7.
28
County of San Bernardino. General Plan Hazard Overlay Map: San Bernardino N (FH30 B).
http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/lus/hazmaps/fh30b_20100309.pdf. \[Accessed June 2021\].
29
California Department of Conservation. Mineral Lands Classification. San Bernardino P-C Region:
Plate 7-7. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc
\[Accessed June 2021\].
30
City of Grand Terrace. General Plan Noise Element. Access June 1, 2021.
https://www.grandterrace-
ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12337255/File/Departments/Planning%20&%20Development/Pl
anning/c6_noise.pdf
31
The Brookings Institute. Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement.
1999.
32
Water Systems Consulting, Inc. 2015 San Bernardino Valley Regional Urban Water Management
Plan. June 2016.
33
Public Resources Code. State Water Code Sections 10910-10915.
http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/laws_regulations/. \[Accessed June 2021\].
34
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. California Statewide Maps.
https://www.fire.ca.gov/imapdata/index.html. \[Accessed June 2021\]
35
City of Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace General Plan: Public Health and Safety Element. Exhibit 5-
3. Page V-12.
36
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. California State Responsibility Areas.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5ac1dae3cb2544629a845d9a19e83991. \[Accessed
June 2021\].
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility_Public Review ISMND with Exhibits_10.12.2021. (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
116 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
Public Review Draft October 11, 2021
Packet Pg. 168
C.1.d
City of Grand Terrace
Planning and Development Services
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programfor
the Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility
Project
State Clearinghouse No. 2021100199
October 21, 2021
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility MMRP (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 169
C.1.d
- This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. -
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility MMRP (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 170
C.1.d
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) identifies Mitigation Measures incorporated into the Condor
Battery EnergyStorage FacilityProject. For each Mitigation Measure, the MMRP identifies the significant impact, the
related mitigation measure, the implementation entity, the monitoring and verification entity, and timing requirements.
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility MMRP (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project 1
October 21, 2021
Packet Pg. 171
C.1.d
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment: Condor BESS Facility MMRP (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
2 City of Grand Terrace
October 21, 2021
Packet Pg. 172
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potential Impacts BIO-1Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey. AProject Planning and Prior to
on Nesting Birds. burrowing owl pre-construction survey shall be conducted ProponentDevelopment issuance of
Servicesgrading/ground
no less than 14 days prior to the initiation of ground
disturbance activities, and a second survey shall be Departmentdisturbance
conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance. Pre-permits.
construction surveys should be conducted by a qualified
biologist. If surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat
is located within the impact footprint or within 500 feet of the
impact footprint, avoidance measures shall be implemented
consistent with the requirements of the Staff Report on
Burrowing Owl Mitigation and in coordination with the City
of Grand Terrace and CDFW.
Potential Impacts BIO-2:Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey.IfProject Planning and Prior to
on Nesting Birds. vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season ProponentDevelopment issuance of
Services grading/ground
(typically January 1 to September 15), then a focused
survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified Departmentdisturbance
permits.
biologist (as determined by a combination of academic
training and professional experience in biological sciences
and related resource management activities) no more than
five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related
activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization
and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and
grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work
areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and
material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors,
surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius
surrounding the work area (in areas where access is
feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project
October 21, 2021
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius.
Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions
suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and
shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in
project-
related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an
additional nest survey shall be required before work can be
reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any
preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine
if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned
without impacting the success of the nest, depending on
conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and
rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist
determines construction activities have potential to
adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately
inform the construction manager to halt construction
activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for
songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests,
depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within
the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist
during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to
the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within
the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist
determines the nest is no longer active due to natural
causes (e.g., young have fledged, predation, or other non-
anthropogenic nest failure).
4
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Adverse Change in CUL-1:Conduct Archaeological Sensitivity Training Project Planning and Prior to
the Significance of for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a ProponentDevelopment issuance of
an Archaeological Services grading/ground
qualified professional archaeologist who meets U.S.
Resource.Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Departmentdisturbance
Standards, to conduct an Archaeological Sensitivity permits.
Training for construction personnel prior to commencement
of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried
out by a cultural resource professional with expertise in
archaeology, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training
session will include a handout and will focus on how to
identify archaeological resources that may be encountered
during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be
followed in such an event, the duties of archaeological
monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional
archaeologist would follow in conducting a salvage
investigation if one is necessary.
Adverse Change in CUL-2:Conduct Periodic Archeological Resources Project Planning and Throughout
the Significance of Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving ProponentDevelopment grading/ground
an Archaeological Activities.The Applicant shall retain a qualified Services disturbance
Resource.professional archaeologist, who meets the U.S. Secretary Departmentactivities.
of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards
to conduct periodic Archaeological Spot Checks beginning
at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction
excavations have exposed or have a high probability of
exposing archaeological resources. After the initial
Archaeological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be
conducted at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist. If
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project
October 21, 2021
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
the qualified archaeologist determines that construction
excavations have exposed or have a high probability of
exposing archaeological artifacts, construction monitoring
for archaeological resources will be required. The Applicant
shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor, who will work
under the guidance and direction of a professional
archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the
U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications
and Standards. The archaeological monitor shall be present
during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching,
or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill younger Pleistocene
alluvial sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction
activities may require multiple archaeological monitors. The
frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of
excavation and grading activities, proximity to known
archaeological resources, the materials being excavated
(native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation,
and if found, the abundance and type of archaeological
resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be
reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by
the Project archaeologist.
Adverse Change in CUL-3:Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Project Planning and Throughout
the Significance of Implement Treatment Plan if Archaeological Resources ProponentDevelopment grading/ground
an Archaeological Services disturbance
Are Encountered.In the event that archaeological
Resource.resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, Departmentactivities.
ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away
from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated.
A buffer area of at least 100 feet shall be established around
the find where construction activities will not be allowed to
6
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the
newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of
the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the
buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by
Project construction activities shall be evaluatedby a
qualified professional archaeologist, who meets the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and
Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be
determined to be prehistoric, Native American
Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and
Native American construction monitoring should be
initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the
archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for
the resources. The plan may include implementation of
archaeological data recovery excavations to address
treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis.
Adverse Change in CUL-4:Prepare Report Upon Completion of Project Planning and Upon
the Significance of Monitoring Services.The archaeological monitor, under ProponentDevelopment completion of
an Archaeological the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who Services Archaeological
Resource.Departmentmonitoring and
meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
salvage
Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at
the conclusion of archaeological monitoring (if required). services.
The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South
Central Costal Information Center, the City, and
representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies
to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and
required mitigation measures. The report shall include a
description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project
October 21, 2021
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA,
and treatment of the resources.
Potential CUL-5:Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Notify Project Planning and Throughout
Disturbance of County Coroner If Human Remains Are Encountered.If ProponentDevelopment grading/ground
Buried Human human remains are unearthed during implementation of the Services disturbance
Remains.Project, the City of Grand Terraceand the Applicant shallDepartmentactivities.
comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5.
The City of Grand Terraceand the Applicant shall
immediately notify the County Coroner and no further
disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made
the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant
to PRC Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to
be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to
notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).
The NAHC shall then identify the person(s) thought to be
the
Most Likely Descendent (MLD). After the MLD has
inspected the remains and the site, they have 48 hours to
recommend to the landowner the treatment and/or disposal,
with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any
associated funerary objects. Upon the reburial of the human
remains, the MLD shall file a record of the reburial with the
NAHC and the Project archaeologist shall file a record of the
reburial with the CHRIS-SCCIC. If the NAHC is unable to
identify a MLD, or the MLD identified fails to make a
recommendation, or the landowner rejects the
recommendation of the MLD and the mediation provided for
in Subdivision (k) of Section 5097.94, if invoked, fails to
provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the
landowner or his or her authorized representative shall inter
8
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
the human remains and items associated with Native
American human remains with appropriate dignity on the
property in a location not subject to further and future
subsurface disturbance.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Adverse Change in GEO-1:Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training Project Planning and Prior to
the Significance of for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a ProponentDevelopment issuance of
a Paleontological Services grading/ground
professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications
Resource.set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall Departmentdisturbance
permits.
conduct a Paleontological SensitivityTraining for
construction personnel prior to commencement of
excavation activities. The training will include a handout and
will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that
may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the
procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of
paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures
to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general
steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in
conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
Adverse Change in GEO-2:Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks Project Planning and Throughout
the Significance of During Grading and Earth-Moving activities. The ProponentDevelopmentgrading/ground
a Paleontological Services disturbance
Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who
Resource.meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Departmentactivities.
Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic
Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six
(6) feet to determine if construction excavations have
extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial
Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be
conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project
October 21, 2021
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
the qualified paleontologist determines that construction
excavations have extended into the older Quaternary
deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological
Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a
qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the
guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who
meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall
be present during all construction excavations (e.g.,
grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older
Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving
construction activities may require multiple paleontological
monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the
rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known
paleontological resources and/or unique geological
features, the materials being excavated (native versus
artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found,
the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or
unique geological features encountered. Full-time
monitoring can be reduced to part-
time inspections if
determined adequate by the qualified professional
paleontologist.
Adverse Change in GEO-3:Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Project Planning and Throughout
the Significance of Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources ProponentDevelopment grading/ground
a Paleontological Are Encountered.In the event that paleontological Services disturbance
Resource.Departmentactivities.
resources and or unique geological features are unearthed
during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing
activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of
the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of
10
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MONITORING
Monitoring
IDENTIFIED
RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE
IMPACT
ImplementationandTiming
EntityVerification Requirements
Entity
at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where
construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until
appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been
approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be
allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant
and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist,
who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate
treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include
implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to
remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the
paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce constructiondelay,
the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in
removing rock samples for initial processing.
Adverse Change in GEO-4:Prepare Report Upon Completion of Project Planning and Upon
the Significance of Monitoring Services.Upon completion of the above ProponentDevelopment completion of
a Paleontological activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a Services Paleontological
Resource.Departmentmonitoring and
report summarizing the results of the monitoring and
salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as salvage
well as a description of the fossils collected and their services.
significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant,
the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles
County, and representatives of other appropriate or
concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of
the Project and required mitigation measures.
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Project
October 21, 2021
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
12
C.1.e
November 23, 2021
To: Steven Weiss, AICP, Planning and Development Services Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
From: Cameron Hile
Senior Analyst
MIG, Inc
1660 Spruce Street, Suite 106
Riverside, CA 92507
Subject: Response to Colton Joint Unified School District Comment Letter Dated
November 17, 2021
Dear Mr. Weiss:
This letter is in response to comments submitted by Mr. Owen Chang, Director of Facilities
Planning and Construction, Colton Joint Unified School District (CJUSD), dated November 17,
2021, regarding the proposed Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility Draft Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). The comments submitted by Mr. Chang are included
as Attachment 1 of this response letter. Provided below are our responses to Mr. ChangÓs
comments, which were formulated in conjunction with Mr. Greg Chittick, Principal and Senior
Engineer at MRS Environmental, Inc., who authored the Project Hazards Analysis Report dated
June 1, 2021. As specified in the Hazards Analysis Report, an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
would be finalized prior to operation of the BESS facility and would include a number of specific
measures, such as local audible and visible alarms, fire detection systems, timely notifications,
minimal concentrations above the Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) level at the
school property line, a slowly developing scenario, an elevated plume, etc. Also provided as
Attachment 2 of this response letter is a sample EOP, which is provided for information and
guidance purposes only and establishes a suggested format to be considered in the preparation
of the final Emergency Response Plan for the proposed Project. In addition, the Megapack
Emergency Response Guide and the Tenaska Fire Safety Plan are also included in the Hazards
Analysis report Attachment E and F and further outline measures that would minimize potential
risk to nearby properties. All of these factors together combine to ensure the risk of impact to
adjacent properties, including to students and faculty at Grand Terrace High School, would be
less than significant in the event of an emergency. As such, no further information or analysis is
required at this time. If you have any questions please feel to contact me at 951-787-9222 or
cameronh@migcom.com.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Best Regards,
Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst, MIG Inc.
Packet Pg. 183
C.1.e
Response to Mr. Owen Chang Comments
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility
November 23, 2021
1.This comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the analysis contained within
the Draft MND; therefore, no further response is required.
2.This comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the analysis contained within
the Draft MND; therefore, no further response is required.
3.ired to develop an Emergency
The commenter correctly states that the Project will be requ
Operations Plan (EOP) in compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Section 4.1.3.2.1. The commenter also correctly states that a Fire Safety Plan (FSP) will be
prepared that includes measures to address emergency response procedures including
notification of local responders per NFPA Section 4.1.3.2.1 and A.4.1.3.2.
The sample EOP provided in Attachment 2 includes specific measures as specified in Section
8 of the Hazards Analysis Report, including local audible and visible alarms, fire detection and
other measures. The Emergency Response Guide and the Fire Safety Plan are also included
in the Hazards Analysis Report as Attachments E and F, which specify measures that will be
implemented to minimize potential hazards. In addition, the sample EOP includes processes
that will be ires and
mplemented by the local fire department, emergency response procedu
notification processes to minimize potential impacts.
4.The commenter raises a concern as to how the downwind communities and District facilities
staff would be notified and protected and requests the ability to review the EOP. In response
to this comment, the City previously required Condor to provide a Draft of the EOP. As
previously stated, Attachment 2 of this response letter includes a sample EOP that specifies
measures that will be completed to ensure sufficient notification to the local fire department
along with the District staff.
In addition, the City has included a condition of approval that requires the EOP to be submitted
to the District for review. The condition will state the following:
The Colton Joint Unified School District (District) shall be provided the opportunity to
review and comment on the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) to ensure immediate
notification of District personnel is provided in the event of an emergency situation that
could impact the District staff and its students. Documentation shall be provided to the City
prior to the project being fully energized that verifies the District was provided an
opportunity to review and comment along with how potential comments were addressed
by the Condor Energy Storage, LLC.
5.The Hazards Analysis Report and associated discussion in the Draft MND address the
potential immediate impacts to areas in the vicinity of the project site if there is an accident
causing a thermal runaway event. The Hazards Analysis Report utilizes the approach defined
in NFPA 855, which defines a level of concern for the toxic, flammable or thermal impacts and
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
determines if receptors could be affected given the reasonable worst-case conditions. This
analysis differs from a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) conducted as part of the AB2588
requirements that examines routine emissions and potential acute health risks over the course
of occasional 1 hour exposures to nearby receptors. As emissions from the BESS do not occur
as part of normal, routine operations, the NFPA approach was used, which defines potential
impacts relaused to
ted to accidents and not routine operations. Generally, an HRA is not
assess potential impacts from accidental releases.
2
Packet Pg. 184
C.1.e
Response to Mr. Owen Chang Comments
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility
November 23, 2021
The presentation of the wind rose in the Hazards Analysis Report indicates that the wind
primarily blows from the west and that all areas around the site, including the high school,
potentially would be impacted by emissions at different levels given an accident. The Hazards
Analysis Report examines whether those levels exceed levels or concentrations that could
cause a concern for a short-term exposure. As indicated, the report assumed the wind was
blowing from the west to model the potential impacts this scenario would have. Under this
worst case analysis, CO concentrations would extend six feet into the real property boundary
for the high school parcel.
As indicated on Page 13 of the Hazards Analysis Report, a thermal issue would develop
relatively slowly: the 9540a testing indicated that it would take 38 minutes to achieve the peak
flame intensity and this peak period would last about 5 minutes. Please note that the results
of the Hazards Analysis Report are representative of emissions during the referenced peak
period only. The system is equipped with detection and notification systems that allow for
notification and response by the Fire Department. As specified in Section 8 on page 26 of the
Hazards Analysis Report, ÐDetection systems shall alarm locally and both visually and audibly,
shall be monitored by a 24-hour system and shall notify the local Fire Department.Ñ Therefore,
in the highly unlikely event that a thermal scenario were to arise, there would be ample time
and notification for both fire department response and school site personnel, and nearby
students/staff, to respond and ensure that students and staff are moved away from the area.
The Hazards Analysis Report assumes the peak emissions rate and is therefore conservative
in its assumptions of downwind concentrations.
The sample EOP provide in Attachment 2 includes a number of specific measures that
combine to ensure the risk of impact to adjacent properties is very low. In summary, with
implementation of the EOP, sufficient time and notification would ensure that District staff are
not exposed to high CO concentrations in the highly unlikely event that a thermal scenario
were to arise that requires emergency notification and response.
6.For the detailed concentration profiles for CO, which is the pollutant emitted in the highest
concentration and therefore traveling the farthest, the Hazards Analysis Report, Attachment
G, indicates that the megapack scenario peak concentration at 160 feet above ground
elevation would be 1261 ppm CO. The Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) level,
which is a concentration at which harm may occur if exposure were to continue for 30 minutes
or more, is the level of concern prescribed by the NFPA 855. The IDLH level for CO is 1200
ppm, which places the peak emissions associated with a worst-case scenario concentration
at 160 feet above ground elevation at roughly 61 ppm higher than the IDLH, or about 5%.
Given there is 24 hour per day, 7 day per week, 365 day per year monitoring of the site,
numerous alarms and notification measurements put in place, and multiple system design
redundancies to slow and mitigate thermal runaway, it is highly unlikely that any adjacent
property would be impacted by an exposure of CO in exceedance of IDLH thresholds for up
to 30 minutes in duration. Furthermore, as discussed on page 15 and as shown in Figure 2 of
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
the Hazards Analysis Report, the modeled plume would be elevated significantly above
ground level and outside of ingestible range due to the elevated temperatures caused by a
thermal event. The data in the analysis representing concentrations at the 166 foot distance
is actually representative of the distance to the plume centerline (the middle of the plume,
which would be elevated as previously described), not the ground level concentration. Ground
level concentrations, as shown also on page G-98, would be less than 10 ppm with a
3
Packet Pg. 185
C.1.e
Response to Mr. Owen Chang Comments
Condor Battery Energy Storage Facility
November 23, 2021
centerline height of about 28 feet. However, the plume centerline concentration was used in
order to ensure a conservative analysis.
The sample EOP provided in Attachment 2 includes a number of specific measures that
combine to ensure the risk of impact to adjacent properties is very low. In summary, with
implementation of the EOP, sufficient time and notification would ensure that District staff are
not exposed to high CO concentrations.
7. In response to the comment, the City has included a condition of approval that requires
construction traffic to be scheduled in a manner that will minimize traffic congestion prior to
the start of school and at the end of the school day. The condition will state the following:
ÐConstruction traffic and material deliveries shall be minimized 30 minutes prior to the start
of school and 30 minutes after school dismissal to the greatest extent feasible.Ñ
8. As stated in the response to comments, the health risk calculations and TAC concentrations
have been adequately analyzed in the Draft MND. In addition, the City has included a
condition of approval that requires the EOP to be submitted to the District prior to the Project
being fully energized. The EOP includes a number of specific measures that, combined, serve
to ensure that any residual risk of impact to adjacent properties is very low.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4
Packet Pg. 186
C.1.e
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 187
C.1.e
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 188
C.1.e
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 189
C.1.e
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 190
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Updated September 20, 2019
In 2018, the U.S. Energy Storage Association (ESA) began coordination of an Energy Storage
Corporate Responsibility Initiative(CRI), which launched in March 2019 with numerous industry
to engage in a good-faith effort to optimize performance, minimize risk
and serve as an exemplary corporate citizen in the manufacturing, deployment, implementation
As of the time of publishing
this document, 47companies are signatories to the pledge.This example emergency response
plan is the result of a collaborative effort under the CRI, bringing together representatives from
companies who have signed the pledge, to create a resource that site owners and operators
could borrow from as they develop robust response plans to suit the specifics of their own sites.
This document is intended to be adapted as needed to be appropriate to the conditions,
environment, staffing, structure, technologies, and setup of a given site.
Legal disclaimer
This Draft Emergency Response Plan (ERP) is provided for information and guidance purposes
only and establishes a suggested format to be consideredin the preparation of an Emergency
Response Plan. Sections of this draft ERP may not be applicable to every site,and the
guidance offeredshould be modified to reflect specific conditions at your site. The Energy
Storage Association assumes no responsibility or liability for the use of this draft. Site owners
and operators are advised to consult with safety consultants and legal and insurance advisors
concerning liability and other issues associated with the adoption and implementation of an
Emergency Response Plan.
It is important to note that an ERP is a document that requires regular updates. Additionally, it
should be flexible and easily understood, while supplying sufficient detail to enablepersonnel to
implement necessary emergency procedures without question or delayin order toensure
continuity of operations.
Acknowledgements
ESA would like to thank all the participants from signatory companies who contributed to the
crafting of this plan. We also acknowledge the invaluable resources that provided a basis for
some of the material in this plan, most notably documentsfrom Invenergy, IHI Energy Storage,
DNV-GL, the Washington State Emergency Response Commission, and sPower.
Packet Pg. 191
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
\[SITE NAME\] EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
Record of Revisions
Change # Date of Change Substance of Change Entered By
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
2
Packet Pg. 192
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
/ƚƓƷĻƓƷƭ
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Limitations ................................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Facility Description ................................................................................................... 5
1.4 Plan Review and Revision ........................................................................................ 6
2. Emergency Response Management ................................................................................ 6
2.1 Overall Organization ................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Roles and Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 6
2.3 Preparation and Planning for Emergencies .............................................................. 7
2.4 Communications ....................................................................................................... 8
2.5 Operator Safety & Equipment ................................................................................... 9
2.6 Safety Training ........................................................................................................10
2.7 Warning Systems and Alarms .................................................................................10
3. Emergency Response ....................................................................................................11
3.1 Analyze, Plan, Implement, Evaluate ........................................................................11
3.2 Evacuation Procedures ...........................................................................................13
3.3 Post Emergency Reporting Procedures ...................................................................14
4. Fire Incidents ..................................................................................................................14
4.1 Conditions Associated with Energy Storage Systems ..............................................15
4.2 Response to a Fire Incident .....................................................................................16
4.3 Site Maintenance and Housekeeping ......................................................................18
5. Chemical Release ..........................................................................................................19
5.1 Hazardous Materials ...............................................................................................19
5.2 Spill Response Procedures .....................................................................................19
5.3 Reporting Major Spills .............................................................................................20
6. Medical Emergency ........................................................................................................21
6.1 Medical Emergency Response Procedures .............................................................21
6.2 Non-Emergency Safety Incident ..............................................................................22
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
7. Security Incidents ...........................................................................................................23
7.1 Bomb Threat ...........................................................................................................23
7.2 Chemical/Biological Agent Threat ............................................................................24
7.3 Sabotage or Vandalism ...........................................................................................24
7.4 Active Shooter .........................................................................................................24
3
Packet Pg. 193
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
8. Environmental Hazards ..................................................................................................25
8.1 Flooding and Flash Flood ........................................................................................25
8.2 Tornado ...................................................................................................................25
8.3 Lightning Storm .......................................................................................................26
8.4 Winter Storm ...........................................................................................................26
8.5 Seismic Event .........................................................................................................26
9. Cybersecurity .................................................................................................................27
Acronyms ..............................................................................................................................28
Appendices ...........................................................................................................................29
Appendix 1: Map of Site .....................................................................................................29
Appendix 2: Evacuation Map..............................................................................................30
Appendix 3: Referenced Titles and Roles ..........................................................................31
Appendix 4: Emergency Contacts ......................................................................................33
Appendix 5: Incident Report Form ......................................................................................35
Appendix 6: Bomb Threat Report .......................................................................................38
Appendix 7: Bomb Threat Checklist ...................................................................................40
Appendix 8: Chemical/Biological Agent Threat Report .......................................................41
Appendix 9: Chemical/Biological Agent Threat Checklist ...................................................43
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4
Packet Pg. 194
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
The following emergency response procedures are provided so that all \[Site Name\]
personnel understand the practices that are to be followed to be prepared for and to
provide immediate and effective response to emergencies that might arise at the facility.
Because the safety of employees is of primary concern, the \[Site Name\] Emergency
Response Coordinator and each member of the \[Site Name\] staff are committed to
providing a safe, healthy work environment and are responsible for ensuring
implementation of these procedures.
Life safety of personnel shall be the highest priority during any event.
1.2 Limitations
This plan does not imply, nor should readers infer, that its implementation will guarantee
that a perfect response will be practical or possible. No plan can shield individuals from
all events.
Responders will attempt to coordinate the plan and response according to all applicable
laws and standards.
Response to emergencies, events or disasters shall only be undertaken to the level of
the responders training, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and resources available.
There may be little to no warning during specific events to implement operational
procedures.
The success or failure of all emergency plans depends upon effective training, continual
(e.g., annual) review of this response plan, and execution of the response.
Sites and operators shall comply with applicable codes, standards, and other
requirements as apply in their locality, even if those codes, standards, and requirements
contradict this plan.
Successful implementation of this plan depends on timely identification of capabilities,
available resources at the time of the incident and a thorough information exchange
between responding organizations and the facility or transporter.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
1.3 Facility Description
\[Site Name\] is located in \[City/County\] at \[Address\]. The site is comprised of \[type of
storage system\] in \[number\] of enclosures across \[energy system site size\] within a
\[overall site size\]. The primary entrance is located at \[location\] with a secondary
entrance at \[location\].
5
Packet Pg. 195
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 1 provides a map of the facility. Notification information for plant and external
support organizations (police, fire department, medical facilities, etc.) that may be called
to respond to emergency situations at \[Site Name\] is included in Appendix 4. Support
personnel are available on the site from \[start time\] to \[end time\]. The Site Manager or
their delegated substitute is available via cellular phone in case of an emergency.
1.4 Plan Review and Revision
A review of this emergency response plan shall be conducted and documented at
minimum on an annual basis. The plan shall also be reviewed and amended whenever
there is a change in facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that affects
emergency response planning. When outside resources are changed or modified the
plan shall be reviewed and updated to reflect the changes that may affect this plan.
2. Emergency Response Management
2.1 Overall Organization
Overall responsibility for the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) lies with the \[Site Name\]
Emergency Response Coordinator. The Emergency Response Coordinator or their
designee is responsible for program implementation, including designating evacuation
routes and employee assembly points, coordinating severe weather activities,
communicating emergency response procedures to site personnel, contracting with
emergency response organizations, and contractor coordination.
2.2 Roles and Responsibilities
Specific management personnel will assume leadership roles for emergency responses.
The Emergency Response Coordinator, Site Manager, and/or Lead Technicians will
assist in the implementation of this plan by knowing and communicating evacuation
routes to workers during emergency evacuation and reporting the status of the
evacuation to the Fire Department. The Emergency Response Coordinator is
responsible for seeing that this plan is implemented and will appoint an adequate
number of personnel to enforce the plan, assure everyone is familiar with this plan and
act as a liaison with the local Fire Department(s).
All facility personnel have a responsibility to immediately report emergency situations to
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
the Lead Technician on duty or local emergency responder personnel when appropriate.
There shall be no delay to report emergency events that require the local emergency
responders. The Lead Technician will then notify the Emergency Response Coordinator
and other key personnel of the situation using the \[Site Name\] Emergency Notification
Telephone List (refer to Appendix 4). Where a Lead Technician is not assigned, facility
personnel will refer to the Emergency Notification Telephone list to inform key personnel.
Titles and roles are summarized in Appendix 3.
6
Packet Pg. 196
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
The Emergency Response Coordinator (or designee) shall be responsible for initiating a
\[Site Owner
/ Operator\], including the Regional Manager to initiate corporate awareness and public
communications activities in accordance with company structure and policies.
A subject matter expert (SME) shall be contactable at all times by telephone. This
person and a designated secondary SME contact should be readily available to first
responders in the case of emergency situations. The SME shall be versed in the
battery
systems will allow the SME to integrate into the emergency response operations when
needed. If this is not practical, a toll-free phone number should be available such that
first responders may call at any time, and be given operational data on the system,
including its current state of health, system alarm notifications, and advice on how to
proceed during an emergency event.
2.3 Preparation and Planning for Emergencies
2.3.1 Pre-planning for emergencies is a crucial element of this plan. The following
steps have been taken in planning for emergency situations at the site:
Fire department and other first responders have received a copy of this
plan and have participated in an on-site familiarization meeting.
All emergency responder access points to the facility shall be identified.
An emergency response information notice board shall be maintained at
\[location readily visible and accessible to all personnel, identified in
Appendix 1\] and contain key contacts for emergencies, a list of personnel
certified in First Aid/CPR, and other notices as outlined in this document
or as deemed appropriate by the Emergency Response Coordinator.
Provision shall be made for non-English speaking workers on site.
All road exits are established and posted on the emergency information
notice board.
Evacuation route diagrams have been documented and posted on the
emergency information notice board.
All buildings and property surrounded by fencing will be marked by
signage that identifies specific hazards (such as the NFPA diamond, and
all applicable Danger, Caution, Warning signal words).
Site personnel receive instruction to keep exits from the site or O&M
Building clear and to maintain ready access to fire extinguishers by not
blocking them with furniture, or any other means.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
modes, personnel are trained in these distances, and such information is
communicated in writing to first responders during drills and other
emergency response informational meetings.
Safety Data Sheets (SDS) provided by manufacturers shall, where
relevant, be provided to first responders. In some cases, manufacturers
7
Packet Pg. 197
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
or suppliers will provide Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) instead of
SDS where relevant.
2.3.2 Emergency Routes
A \[Site Name\] evacuation sheet shall be posted and orally communicated to site
personnel. These procedures shall be discussed at periodic safety meetings in
addition to being covered during new employee orientation. Personnel are to
know at least two exits whenever possible and be familiar with the evacuation
routes posted in the location indicated on the site map (Appendix 1).
Depending upon the degree of emergency, weather and/or site conditions,
roadways as designated on the site map (Appendix 1) will be used for routes of
evacuation. In the event of an evacuation, all personnel will meet at the
designated muster point for further information. If the primary muster point is
inaccessible or hazardous, personnel shall gather at the secondary muster point
and inform the emergency coordinator (if not present) by radio or telephone. The
emergency response coordinator shall inform personnel of a diversion to the
secondary muster point by such mean as are available, to include radio or loud
hailer. If personnel are unable to make it to the designated muster points, they
should seek shelter wherever possible and contact their supervisor for further
instructions. Accountability of personnel shall be of the upmost importance and
be conducted in a timely manner. Responder access points shall be kept
unobstructed at all times so first responders will not be hindered in their
operations when responding to emergencies within the site.
2.4 Communications
Timely and efficient communications are essential to deal with an emergency response
situation. The Emergency Response Coordinator is the central point of contact for all
involved in an emergency response, including for first responders and Subject Matter
Experts (SMEs). The following processes shall be observed during emergency
communications:
Employees using radios/phones shall yield to individuals who are the most
directly involved in an emergency response activity, i.e. emergency response
takes priority over all other communication on company network.
Emergency transmissions should be clearly announced using signal words such
proceed with their message.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
If emergency radio/phone communications are interrupted or unclear, employees
shall proceed to the muster point located at \[location\] and identified in Appendix
1.
All hand-held radios/phones should be recharged daily with back-up batteries
ready for use.
8
Packet Pg. 198
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Radios shall be inspected daily for functionality and a radio check shall be
transmitted to confirm that both the transmission and receiving functions work. If
a radio is not working properly then the employee shall notify the lead technician
and make arrangements for some other form of communication while working.
Radios that are not working properly shall be placed out of service and labeled
appropriately so they will not be used by another employee.
Provision shall be made for non-English speaking workers on site.
2.5 Operator Safety & Equipment
2.5.1 General recommendations for operator safety
Inspect equipment daily for unsafe conditions.
Keep hands away from exposed electrical connections.
Keep hands away from hot surfaces.
Observe all high voltage warnings.
Any outstanding observations shall be reported to their supervisor
immediately and documented.
2.5.2 Personal Protective Equipment
The operation or maintenance of specific equipment may have different safety
requirements. There are different levels of PPE that must be checked and
maintained. All personnel who wear levels of protection above and beyond their
normal everyday attire must be trained in that PPE. All training of PPE shall be
conducted by a competent person and documented. Some PPE have a SCAM
(selection, care and maintenance) document that will instruct the end user on the
limitations of the PPE and the proper maintenance of the PPE. Always be aware
of individual equipment operational requirements and hazards as well as out of
service dates. For example,
Safety glasses with side shields (no dark glasses are permitted except
those approved for welding or cutting)
Face shields for cutting & grinding
Approved safety toe shoes
Approved hearing protection
Approved hardhat
Approved gloves
Long sleeve shirt
Long pants
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
All PPE is required to be worn at all times for the working being conducted. Any
PPE that is compromised or no longer considered viable for protection shall be
discarded and replaced. Any PPE that comes in contact with hazardous material
shall be properly decontaminated and inspected for functionality before being
returned to service.
9
Packet Pg. 199
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
2.6 Safety Training
2.6.1 General training requirements
Initial training for all site personnel with respect to the contents of this ERP shall
be undertaken upon the start of employment or substantial changes in duties.
Refresher training of the ERP to site personnel shall be conducted at least
annually. Documentation of ERP training is to be maintained in site files.
A variety of emergency response drills (such as fire, tornado, bomb threat, etc.
as relevant to the site) are to be held by \[site owner/operator\] at minimum on a
quarterly basis and shall be documented. At least on an annual basis, the
\[locality\] Fire Department and other emergency response personnel shall be
requested to participate and assist with critique of evacuation drills. Table-top
exercises are encouraged to familiarize relevant response personnel with
procedures for different types of emergencies that could be encountered at the
site.
The site Emergency Response Coordinator and Lead Technicians are trained in
their specific duties upon being assigned these roles or beginning their
employment. All building occupants have been instructed in actions to take in
case of an emergency through their copies of procedures and training, as
needed.
Operator personnel should receive supplier / manufacturer approved training on
the specific characteristics of the energy storage system. Applicable common
standards (e.g. on electrical safety) should be taken into account.
All personnel who wear levels of protection above and beyond their normal
everyday attire must be trained in that PPE. All training of PPE shall be
conducted by a competent person and documented.
All hazardous materials incident emergency responders and workers at
hazardous materials facilities, transport companies, waste treatment facilities,
storage facilities and disposal facilities will be provided training which meets
federal and state standards. Such training will be commensurate with their
employers or organization
Initial and refresher training regarding warning systems and alarms shall be
conducted at least annually. Documentation of training is to be maintained in site
files.
2.7 Warning Systems and Alarms
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Audible and visual (e.g., flashing lights) alarm systems should be established that reflect
specific on-site hazard analyses. Personnel should be trained on the significance of
different alarms and the corresponding actions as outlined elsewhere in this Plan.
Descriptions of each alarm and corresponding actions should be clearly posted on an
emergency information notice board (location marked on map in Appendix 1).
10
Packet Pg. 200
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Warning systems and alarms should be tested at least every six months or more
frequently per manufacturer specifications or code requirements. Tests shall be
documented. All site personnel, as well as those offsite who are likely to hear or see an
alarm, should be made aware of tests so as not to cause undue concern.
3. Emergency Response
3.1 Analyze, Plan, Implement, Evaluate
handling an emergency: Analyze, Plan, Implement, Evaluate.
Analyze: Analyzing the response is the phase in which the notification takes
place to emergency responders.
Plan: Planning the response is the phase in which the proper resources and
equipment are called to the emergency scene and a plan is developed to mitigate
the emergency.
Implement: Once a plan is developed and the proper resources and equipment
are there, then the Emergency Response Coordinator will make the
determination to implement the plan.
Evaluate: Once the plan is implemented, it shall be evaluated for safety and
effectiveness. If the plan is not safe or effective, then the process should start
over again with Analyze, Plan, Implement, and Evaluate.
Only personnel who are properly trained in accordance with 29 CFR Part 1910.120(q)(6)
may respond to hazardous chemical releases.
No employee is required or permitted to place himself or herself
to facilitate extinguishment, evacuation, or rescue. All rescue operations will be
performed by trained professionals upon their arrival. Rescue operations will only be
conducted after a risk-reward analysis is done and proper PPE is used to protect against
any adverse hazards that may be encountered.
Incidents where local fire department personnel are involved will be managed under a
establishes a primary incident commander and a liaison to or for the Emergency
Response Coordinator.
3.1.1 Analyze
Without entering an immediate hazard area, the employee who first discovers an
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
emergency should identify the following:
Is there a fire, spill, explosion, or other incident happening?
Does medical assistance appear to be needed?
Who/what is at risk: people, the environment, or property?
What are the weather and terrain conditions and risks?
11
Packet Pg. 201
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
The employee will also isolate the area to keep people away from the scene until
trained responders arrive, as long as it is safe to do so. An employee who has
not received training in emergency response should take no actions beyond
notification, isolation of the area, and personal safety precautions. Any efforts
made to rescue persons, protect property, or protect the environment must be
weighed against the possibility of becoming part of the problem. Attempts to
rescue others shall only be attempted with proper PPE, proper training, and in a
manner that does not create significant risk to rescuer or others. Persons at the
scene must not contact spilled material or inhale fumes, smoke, or vapors.
3.1.2 Plan
After all life hazards are no longer a threat, a plan of operation shall be devised
for remediation of the event. The plan shall be communicated to all responders
and safety of all responders shall be paramount. A staging area, if needed, shall
be identified for extra personnel and equipment that may be needed to
accomplish the plans objectives. All responders that will enter the hot zone
(affected area) must be made aware of any decontaminated area upon their exit
of the hot zone. Trained responders will be called to the scene by the O&M
Manager and/or Lead Technicians to begin the process of hazard assessment
and to establish objectives and priorities. The hot zone shall be identified, and all
non-essential personnel shall not be permitted to enter this area without proper
training and permission of the Emergency Response Coordinator.
3.1.3 Implement
The initial response phase starts with notification, which activates the emergency
response system. Anyone who observes or receives information regarding an
emergency at \[Site Name\] should immediately notify available personnel using
the \[Site Name\] radio network or their issued cell phones. The Emergency
Response Coordinator and/or Lead Technician will then ensure 911 is notified. At
\[Site Name\], employees are notified of emergencies by cell phone/radio and
word of mouth from the Emergency Response Coordinator and/or Lead
Technicians. Appendix 4 provides a list of emergency notification information for
\[Site Name\] personnel.
If an event has the potential to impact the local community, \[Site Name\] will
contact local fire/police to make community notifications. The contact list in
Appendix 2 also provides notification information for the Company Public Affairs
team who will provide guidance for instances involving media. The Emergency
Response Coordinator and/or Lead Technicians will coordinate any media efforts
through the \[Site Name\] Asset Manager and Company Legal Department.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
The incident command post will be set up in a location free of contaminants and
located upwind uphill and upstream. The Emergency Response Coordinator or
designee shall remain at the incident command post to serve as a liaison to the
Incident Commander designated by emergency responders. Trained responders
tive equipment.
Personnel entering the hot zone shall be briefed on the plan before entering. All
communication devices shall be tested prior to entry into the hot zone. A
12
Packet Pg. 202
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
decontamination corridor shall be established prior to entry into the hot zone.
There shall be accountability taken of all personnel entering and leaving the hot
zone. A back up team that has the same PPE shall be at the ready in the event
of the entry team needs quick assistance. A decontamination team shall be ready
to for after exiting the location (warm zone). There shall be a doffing station that
is set up immediately at the end of the decontamination section that will allow the
responders a safe place to remove their PPE. Only trained responders are
authorized to risk exposure to chemicals for purposes of containing or stopping
the material release.
The Emergency Response Coordinator or a designee will be responsible for
notifying the appropriate regulatory agencies and, if necessary, the Emergency
Response Contractor or mutual aid groups. Appendix 2 includes a list of
emergency contacts and agencies that may be notified in the event of an
emergency. The incident will be documented and kept on file.
3.1.4 Evaluate
During the implementation phase of the emergency, response, action and
progress shall be analyzed by the Emergency Response Coordinator constantly.
If the plan seems to be ineffective or unsafe the responders shall be removed
from the hot zone and the plan shall be revised. The new plan shall be
implemented, and that revised plan shall be analyzed for safety effectiveness
again.
3.2 Evacuation Procedures
When notified to evacuate, site personnel shall do so in a calm and orderly fashion,
keeping the following instructions in mind:
ho need assistance as long as doing so does not put
you at greater risk.
Stay upwind, upstream, and uphill whenever possible.
Watch for other traffic and equipment on access roads and roadways.
Be aware of ice/snow and loose gravel conditions.
Drive safely.
Site personnel shall go to the primary designated muster area as identified in Appendix
1. If employees are unable to make it to the muster area, they should divert to the
secondary muster area and immediately contact their supervisor for further instructions.
During evacuation, the Emergency Response Coordinator and/or Lead Technicians
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
should ensure that every person on his/her crew has been notified and that evacuation
routes are clear. Any person with a disability (mobility, hearing, sight, etc.) who requires
assistance to evacuate is responsible for pre-arranging with someone in their immediate
work area to assist them in the event of an emergency. Anyone knowing of a person with
a disability or injury who was not able to evacuate will report this fact immediately to their
supervisor. This information shall be communicated to emergency responders
immediately upon their arrival if the disabled person has not been evacuated.
13
Packet Pg. 203
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Once an evacuation is complete, the Emergency Response Coordinator or Lead
Technician should account for all personnel. This accountability information shall be
communicated to the emergency responders immediately upon their arrival. When a
person is unaccounted for, the following information shall be communicated to the
emergency responders:
Name of the individual
Disabled or not disabled
Work location
Last known location
3.3 Post Emergency Reporting Procedures
Following any emergency described in this plan, and in compliance with facility permits
and other County and/or State requirements, an incident report will be prepared by the
Emergency Response Coordinator and transmitted to the appropriate individuals and
agencies after review by the Company Regional Manager.
The Emergency Response Coordinator shall compile all documentation and perform a
post-emergency investigation. Immediate performance of this activity will aid in
determining the exact circumstances and cause of the incident. Issues to be determined
include:
Causes of the incident.
Effectiveness of the emergency response plan.
Need for amendments to the response plan.
Need for additional training programs.
The fire department will make the final determination regarding when the scene is safe
to release the site to staff. In some circumstances the scene may need to be
safeguarded for investigators to examine the event failures. If the event was caused by a
criminal act, the O&M manager shall be guided by law enforcement for direction.
If the facility is not able to reopen due to the event, the O&M Manager will make a
determination regarding continuity of operations for the facility in consultation with the
Company Regional Manager.
4. Fire Incidents
All personnel working at \[Site Name\] are to be trained and should know how to prevent
and respond to a fire emergency. All on-site personnel shall:
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Complete an on-site training program identifying the fire risks at \[Site Name\].
Understand the protocol and follow emergency procedures should an event
occur.
Review and report potential fire hazards to the Emergency Response
Coordinator.
14
Packet Pg. 204
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
No employee is required or permitted to place himself or herself
to facilitate extinguishment, evacuation, or rescue. All rescue operations will be
performed by trained professionals upon their arrival.
4.1 Conditions Associated with Energy Storage Systems
4.1.1 Unique Challenges
Energy storage systems present a unique challenge for fire fighters. Unlike a
typical electrical or gas utility, an energy storage system does not have a single
point of disconnect. Whereas there are disconnects that will de-energize select
parts of the system, batteries will remain energized.
The following hazards may be encountered when fighting fires in energy storage
systems:
Shock or arcing hazard due to the presence of water during suppression
activities.
Related electrical enclosures may not resist water intrusion from the high-
pressure stream of a fire hose.
Batteries damaged in the fire may not resist water intrusion.
Damaged conductors may not resist water intrusion.
Shock hazard due to direct contact with energized components.
No means of complete electrical disconnect.
Chemical spills.
Toxic gases.
Thermal runaway and explosions.
4.1.2 Fire and Water
Due to the hazards described above, care and consideration should be applied
when considering fire suppression by means of water inundation within energy
storage systems. But because water as an extinguishing agent is commonplace,
the appropriate use of water should be assessed, i.e. whether water reacts with
the chemistries present or whether it is not an appropriate extinguisher class.
The local fire department should be informed of appropriate fire suppression
methods for the energy storage system type as identified by the equipment
manufacturer.
If unconventional fire extinguishers are required, local first responders should be
alerted and trained on their use, including a familiarization drill. The appropriate
and most suitable extinguisher should be recommended based on the specific
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
needs of the site in accordance with guidance from the manufacture. This may
include water in some cases, and in all scenarios its use should not be
discouraged.
All fire extinguishing equipment, whether automatic or manual, shall be regularly
15
Packet Pg. 205
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
4.2 Response to a Fire Incident
In the event of an incipient stage (beginning, small) fire, employees should notify
adjacent individuals of this situation and exit the area. Only employees trained in the use
of fire extinguishers or other manual fire suppression systems should attempt to use an
extinguisher or system. Employees are not expected or authorized to respond to fires
beyond the incipient stage (i.e., fires that are beyond the beginning stage and which
cannot be extinguished using a hand-held, portable fire extinguisher). The fire
department should be immediately notified by dialing 911 when any type of unintended
fire has taken place. Site management shall also be immediately notified of any
emergency.
4.2.1 Fire External to Battery Container or Enclosure
Call 911 and report the following:
o Site name: \[Site Name\]
o The address of the main entrance: \[Address\] or nearest site access
point
o Injuries, if any, and need for ambulance
Make sure the immediate area of the fire is clear of personnel.
Account for all employees, contractors, and visitors who were working in the
immediate area of the fire. If any personnel are unaccounted for from the
immediate fire area, a communication shall be made through out the facility
in attempt to locate the person(s) missing. If the person(s) is equipped with
a facility radio then an emergency transmission shall be communicated in
attempt to locate the person(s).
Contact the O&M Manager (if present) and Emergency Response
Coordinator (if not the O&M Manager) immediately.
Remove any obstructions (vehicles, material, etc.) that might impede
response to the scene.
Station available personnel at road intersections to stop traffic flow into the
fire scene.
Evacuate the energy storage system area immediately if the fire warning
alarm sounds or fire warning lights illuminate.
Proceed to the designated muster point for head count.
o If onsite, the designated Emergency Response Coordinator will do a
head count and relay any information/instructions.
If you encounter heavy smoke, stay low and breathe through a handkerchief
or other fabric; move away from the area.
Assist anyone having trouble leaving the area so long as doing so does not
put the assistor at additional risk.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Attempt to extinguish the fire ONLY if you have had the appropriate training
and proper firefighting agent for the type of fire. Refer to the specific safety
data sheet.
Do not leave the designated muster point until advised to do so. If risk (e.g.
smoke) requires evacuation of the muster point, the secondary muster point
(designated on the map in Appendix 1) will be used and that fact announced
via radio and alarms as available.
16
Packet Pg. 206
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
The Emergency Response Coordinator will
fire department informs them that it is safe to do so.
The energy storage system is not to be accessed until the O&M Manager or
designated Emergency Response Coordinator gives authorization.
4.2.2 Fire Internal to Battery Container
Call 911 and report the following:
o Site name: \[Site Name\]
o The address of the main entrance: \[Address\] or nearest site access
point
o Injuries, if any, and need for ambulance
Make sure the immediate area of the fire is clear of personnel.
Account for all employees, contractors, and visitors who were working in the
area of the fire. If any personnel are unaccounted for from the immediate
fire area, a communication shall be made through out the facility in attempt
to locate the person(s) missing. If the person(s) is equipped with a facility
radio then an emergency transmission shall be communicated in attempt to
locate the person(s).
Contact the O&M Manager (if present) and Emergency Response
Coordinator (if not the O&M Manager) immediately.
Contact the Operations Center and Manager (if present).
Evacuate the area immediately if the fire warning alarm sounds or fire
warning lights illuminate.
Remove any obstructions (vehicles, material, etc.) that might impede
response to the scene.
Proceed to the designated muster point for head count.
If onsite, the designated Emergency Response Coordinator will do a head
count and relay any information/instructions.
If you encounter heavy smoke, stay low and breathe through a handkerchief
or other fabric.
If there is a second means of egress that is clear of smoke, that egress path
will be used and a radio transmission or other type of communication shall
be made stating that the clear egress point for other personnel to use for
escape is the second means of egress.
Assist anyone having trouble leaving the area so long as doing so does not
put the assistor at additional risk.
The fire suppression system is designed to work in a contained
environment. DO NOT open the doors until it has been determined that the
agent has been fully released and a pre-determined amount of time has
passed to ensure no hazards are present, and with approval of emergency
personnel and Subject Matter Expert.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
DO NOT equipment in the
container.
Once the Fire Department arrives, provide them with the following -
o All applicable SDS documents
o Assistance isolating equipment electrically
o This emergency response plan
17
Packet Pg. 207
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
o A liaison to remain with the fire department Incident Commander as
needed
Do not leave the designated muster point until advised to do so. If risk (e.g.
smoke) requires evacuation of the muster point, the secondary muster point
(designated on the map in Appendix 1) will be used and that fact announced
via radio and alarms as available.
The O&M manager and/or Emergency Response Coordinator (if not the
O&M manager)
them that it is safe to do so and the site (or portions of it) can be reoccupied
or normal working conditions can be resumed again.
The energy storage system is not to be accessed until the O&M Manager or
designated Emergency Response Coordinator and the emergency
responders give authorization.
In the event of a fire incident, the designated operations personnel responsible
for the safe shutdown of the plant will open switchgear to ensure the grid side of
the plant is de-energized and isolate the batteries as best able to (i.e. verify the
AC and DC breakers are open in the inverter). The Fire Department needs to
understand that some of the equipment (batteries) will remain energized no
matter what actions are taken, and the recommended option is containment.
Batteries remain energized even if all the contactors, breakers, and switches
have been opened.
4.2.3 After a Fire
Hazards after a fire should be identified at the time of installation such that
recommendations for personal protective equipment (PPE) are available for
clean-up crews and hazardous materials (HAZMAT) teams. This may include
respirators to protect personnel from toxic gas that continues to be generated
from hot cells. Firewater retention and cleanup measures may be required by
local regulations. Once first responders have turned the site back to \[The
Company\], the Subject Matter Expert, in coordination with the Emergency
Response Coordinator, shall direct on-site personnel on procedures for securing
the site for safety and pending any investigation.
In addition to the gas generation risk, cells that remain hot also pose a delayed
ignition risk, whereby heat in the cell may transfer to undamaged adjacent cells
or remaining active material and reignite the fire. As such, fire-damaged
equipment must remain monitored for \[a period identified in consultation with
equipment manufacturer and SME\].
Care should be taken to ensure that damaged batteries containing energy have
been safety de-energized in accordance with disposal procedures, if possible,
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
before handling and disposal. If unable to completely de-energize batteries
involved in a fire, care should be taken with handling or dismantling battery
systems involved in fires as they may still contain hazardous energy levels.
4.3 Site Maintenance and Housekeeping
18
Packet Pg. 208
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Fire extinguishers shall be inspected monthly as per NFPA 10.
Fire extinguishers shall not be obstructed and should be in conspicuous locations
with appropriate signage as per NFPA 10.
Combustible material shall not be stored in mechanical rooms, electrical equipment
rooms, or energy storage system enclosures.
Outside dumpsters shall be kept at least five (5) feet away from combustible
materials and the lids should be kept closed.
Materials or equipment storage is not allowed in electrical equipment rooms, or near
electrical panels.
Electrical panel openings must be covered.
Power strips must be plugged directly into an outlet and not daisy-chained and
should be for temporary use only.
Extension cords and flexible cords should not be substituted for permanent ones.
5. Chemical Release
5.1 Hazardous Materials
An inventory of hazardous materials shall be maintained in the \[onsite location\] and
provided in advance to first responders, including fire and ambulance services. Materials
typically on site include:
\[List of hazardous materials\]
In the event of a breach of energy storage system containment, hazardous materials that
may be released include:
\[List of hazardous materials\]
Only personnel who are properly trained in accordance with 29 CFR Part 1910.120(q)(6)
may respond to hazardous chemical releases.
5.2 Spill Response Procedures
An emergency spill kit is maintained in the \[location\], identified on the map in Appendix
1. This kit includes, at a minimum:
Absorbent socks, pads, or pillows
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Disposal bags and ties
Safety glasses
Rubber gloves
Appropriate neutralization medium for liquid present
Hazardous labels
Bag of Life-Dri absorbent or equivalent
Shovel
19
Packet Pg. 209
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Broom
A formal notification process shall be initiated when a hazardous material spill or
potential spill is first observed. Immediate actions are necessary. The first individual who
discovers a spill (spill observer) will be responsible for initiating notification and response
procedures. Only employees that are properly trained in accordance with 29 CFR Part
1910.120(q)(6) may respond to hazardous chemical releases. \[Site Owner\] is
responsible for providing spill recognition and response training for personnel. At least
one trained employee shall be on duty at all times.
The first person to witness the spill shall follow these procedures:
1. Make an assessment of the incident as observed.
2. If the incident can be safely controlled, take steps to do so (e.g., turn off source
of spill).
3. Notify the Emergency Response Coordinator and provide as much information as
possible.
The Emergency Response Coordinator shall follow these procedures in the event of a
spill:
1. Notify Supervisors.
2. Make sure all personnel are removed from the spill area.
3. Take immediate actions to minimize any threat to public safety (verify the spill
area has been cordoned off).
4. Secure the source of the spill, if safely possible to do so.
5. Maintain close observation of the spill.
Cleanup may range from very simple removal of minor spills, to installation of skimmers
around large spills or between sensitive areas and spills for longer, prolonged cleanups.
Cleanups shall be conducted as per OSHA regulations (part 1910). Cleanups can be on
pavement or on soil surfaces. On-site personnel shall be trained in the proper use of the
cleanup materials. The Emergency Response Contractor or other contracted and
appropriately certified waste management company may provide cleanup and
remediation services. It is strongly recommended that all contractors determine a
disposal site in advance of a spill incident.
5.3 Reporting Major Spills
After initial spill response has begun, notification and reporting to agency personnel shall
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
occur. \[state-specific response requirements go here, referencing relevant document(s)
which may be included in an appendix\] The following procedures should be followed
when reporting major spills:
Never include information that has not been verified.
Never speculate as to the cause of the incident or make any acknowledgment of
liability.
Do not delay reporting because of incomplete information.
20
Packet Pg. 210
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Notify persons/agencies and document notification and the content of the message.
For spills of federal reportable quantities, in conformance with the requirements in
40 CFR parts 110,119, and 302, the Emergency Response Coordinator shall notify
the National Response Center at (800) 424-8802.
Other agencies which may need to be consulted include, but are not limited to, the
\[County/City\] fire department, \[County/City\] Public Works Department, state police,
\[Locality\] Police Department, State Department of Toxic Substances, OSHA, \[State
Environmental Quality Authority\], and (if relevant) \[State Water Authority\].
6. Medical Emergency
6.1 Medical Emergency Response Procedures
If an employee is injured, or an accident has occurred on site and first aid is not enough
treatment for the emergency, 911 must be called. The call to 911 can be made by phone
by any available site personnel. The caller must state to the dispatch that they are at the
\[Company, Site Name\] A second notification will be made to the O&M Building, to
inform others of the situation.
\[Site Name\] employees certified in first aid/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may
administer aid if they have completed training. Regularly-present employees with first
aid/CPR training are identified on the emergency information notice board and
employees shall be aware of who on staff is so certified. At all times when the site is
staffed, at least one first aid certified member of staff shall be present. The location of
first aid kits and automated external defibrillators (AEDs), if present, shall be identified by
appropriate signage and indicated on the map in Appendix 1.
All employees shall designate a personal emergency contact, which shall be kept on file.
6.1.1 Serious Injury
The following procedures apply for serious medical injuries such as loss of
consciousness, heart attack, bone fractures, neck trauma, or severe burns.
1. If life threatening, call 911.
2. Notify Operations and/or Safety Managers.
3. Provide name, exact location, number of injured persons, and brief
description of incident.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
4. On-site personnel shall meet EMS responders at site entrance and direct
them to location of incident.
5. Do not leave or move the injured unless directed to by Safety Managers
or EMS responders.
6. Administer first aid if necessary.
21
Packet Pg. 211
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
7.
contact.
8. Document incident and keep on file.
6.1.2 Attending an Incident
When attending an incident, the following procedures apply:
1. Clear a path to the injured person for Operations and/or Safety Managers
and assign personnel to assist with signaling EMS responders to the
location of the incident.
2. Identify location of Project Site entrance nearest to the incident and notify
EMS responders.
3. Operations and/or Safety Managers shall meet EMS responders at site
entrance.
4. Direct and accompany EMS responders to location of incident.
5. Follow all directions of EMS responders.
6. Contact management personnel and/or subcontractors.
7. Document incident and keep on file.
6.1.3 Medical Facilities
The nearest medical facility to the project site is:
\[Hospital Address\]
Directions from site entrance:
\[Turn-by-turn directions, and link to online map directions\]
6.2 Non-Emergency Safety Incident
6.2.1 Notification of Minor Incidents
In the event a safety incident occurs where emergency response is not required
(first aid treatment, near miss, etc.) work is to be stopped immediately and
reported to the Emergency Response Coordinator and/or Lead Technician. Risk
will be reassessed, adequate controls implemented, and the situation made safe
before resuming the task. The event will be documented and kept on file.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
6.2.2 Heat Illness
When the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit (35 degrees Celsius), or
is expected to be so during the course of a shift or work project, the O&M
Manger will hold short staff meetings to review the weather report; reinforce heat
illness prevention with all workers; and provide reminders to drink water
22
Packet Pg. 212
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
frequently, to be on the lookout for signs and symptoms of heat illness, and
inform them that shade can be made available upon request.
Employees shall have free access to potable drinking water provided and located
as close as practicable to the areas where employees are working. Where
drinking water is not plumbed or otherwise continuously supplied, it shall be
provided in sufficient quantity at the beginning of the work shift to provide one
quart per employee per hour for drinking for the entire shift. Employers may
begin the shift with smaller quantities of water if they have effective procedures
for replenishment during the shift as needed to allow employees to drink one
quart or more per hour. The frequent drinking of water shall be encouraged.
7. Security Incidents
7.1 Bomb Threat
7.1.1 The purpose of this plan is to give direction to all site personnel in the event \[Site
Name\] is a target of an actual or threatened bomb assault/attack.
Anyone receiving a bomb threat shall:
Treat the caller with courtesy and respect. Complete the Bomb Threat
Report (Appendix 6). Use this sheet as a reference while talking with the
caller making the threat.
Appendix 7).
Immediately notify the \[Site Name\] Emergency Coordinator by phone. Stop
all radio transmissions from this point on until cleared by the Emergency
Coordinator or other competent authority. Radio transmissions can activate
electronic detonating or timing devices.
The Emergency Response Coordinator will immediately notify 911. The
Emergency Response Coordinator shall:
Evaluate the threat and determine the appropriate course of action to take.
Notify law enforcement and/or ambulance.
Evacuate the facility as necessary.
Coordinate evacuation of any part of the surrounding community with local
authorities as needed.
Coordinate search of the site with proper authorities.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
7.1.2 If any suspicious item(s) are found, they are not to be touched. Barrier tape will
be used to mark the area where the suspicious item(s) are by extending a
continuous line of tape beginning immediately in front of the suspicious item(s)
and extending to just outside the room exit. This will help guide local authorities
to the suspicious item.
23
Packet Pg. 213
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
The Emergency Response
is communicated once the threat has passed or is no longer present.
7.2 Chemical/Biological Agent Threat
The procedures described previously for a bomb threat should be used for a chemical or
biological agent threat. Refer to Appendix 8 for a copy of the phone report when
receiving such a threat and Appendix 9 for a checklist.
Any person that is exhibiting signs and symptoms from a chemical or biological agent
should be isolated from other workers and be prepared for transport by EMS.
7.3 Sabotage or Vandalism
Anyone detecting any act or threat of any act of sabotage or vandalism will immediately
notify the Emergency Response Coordinator. The Emergency Response Coordinator will
evaluate the situation and decide what actions to take. The following options should be
considered and/or implemented:
Notification of 911.
Corrective action as required, providing that no person will risk injury.
Evacuation of the facility.
7.4 Active Shooter
In an active shooter situation, employees should:
1. Quickly determine what actions to take to protect life: options include run, hide, and
fight Ready.gov site). Use best judgment based on the
specific circumstances of the incident. Getting away from the shooter(s) is the top
priority. Call 911 when in a safe location and warn/prevent individuals from entering
an area where an active shooter may be if possible.
2. When encountering responding police, remain calm and follow any and all
instructions from the officers. Officers may shout commands and push individuals to
the ground for his/her safety as well as their own. When law enforcement personnel
arrive at the scene, personnel should be aware of the following:
Follow all official instructions from police;
Remain calm, think, and resist the urge to panic;
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Immediately raise hands and spread fingers;
Keep hands visible at all times;
Put down any items;
Avoid making sudden or quick movements toward officers;
Do not point, scream, or yell;
Do not ask for help from the officers when evacuating;
Proceed in the direction as advised by the officers; and
24
Packet Pg. 214
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Provide all relevant information to police.
8. Environmental Hazards
8.1 Flooding and Flash Flood
Flash flooding is a result of heavy localized rainfall such as that from slow moving,
intense thunderstorms. Flash floods often result from small creeks and streams
overflowing during heavy rainfall. These floods often become raging torrents of water
which rip through riverbeds or canyons, sweeping everything with them. Flash flooding
can occur within 30-minutes to six hours of a heavy rain event. In hilly terrain, flash
floods can strike with little or no advance warning. Distant rain may be channeled into
gullies and ravines causing flash flooding in minutes. In the event of a flash flood, the
following procedures shall apply:
During periods of thunderstorms, always remain alert to heavy rains in your
immediate area or upstream from your location. It does not have to be raining at
your location for flash flooding to occur.
Do not drive through flooded areas. Even if it looks shallow enough to cross.
Do not cross flowing streams on foot where water is above your ankles.
Be especially cautious at night. It is harder to recognize water danger then.
Do not attempt to outrace a flood on foot. If you see or hear it coming, move to
higher ground immediately.
Be familiar with the land features where you work. It may be in a low area, near a
drainage ditch, or small stream.
Stay tuned to weather forecasts and updates for the latest statements, watches,
and warnings concerning heavy rain and flash flooding in the Project Area.
Waiting 15 to 30 minutes, or until high water recedes, is a simple safety measure.
8.2 Tornado
Upon the issuance of a tornado warning, O&M personnel will evacuate the site and
report to the pre-designated shelter area, to be determined prior to O&M personnel
arrival. In the event O&M personnel are outside and unable to evacuate to the shelter,
the following procedures will be followed:
Lie flat in a nearby ditch or depression, covering the head with the hands. Be aware
of the potential for flooding.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
O&M personnel are safest in a low, flat location and will be instructed to not get
under an overpass or bridge.
O&M personnel will be instructed to never try to outrun a tornado in congested
areas in a vehicle. It is safest to leave the vehicle for safe shelter.
O&M Personnel are instructed to beware of flying debris.
25
Packet Pg. 215
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Following tornado or high wind events, the site facility will be evaluated by O&M
personnel for damage. All repairs will be performed under standard operational
procedures.
8.3 Lightning Storm
In the event a lightning storm is within 10 30 miles and approaching the Site, the
following procedures shall apply.
Notify Operations and/or Safety Manager, and all on-site employees.
Stop work safely and head to staging and laydown yards in vehicles.
Remain at staging and laydown yards, get update on weather conditions.
If storm/lighting is still approaching the Project Site, get in and stay in company or
personal vehicles that have rubber tires only.
If safe enough to do so, take cover in on-site designated shelters.
Once storm passes, remain in cars/trucks for at least 30 minutes depending on
the O&M Manager or
Emergency Response Coordinator in charge of monitoring the storm.
8.4 Winter Storm
Before winter approaches, the facility will ensure adequate supplies, including:
Rock salt or similar products to melt ice on walkways.
Sand to improve traction.
Snow shovels and other snow removal equipment.
As needed, service agreement(s) with snow removal vendors.
When winter weather threats exist, the facility will monitor local news channels for critical
information from the National Weather Service (NWS). Be alert to changing weather
conditions. Winter storm watches, warnings, and advisories are issued by local National
Weather Service Forecast offices.
Depending on the severity of the winter storm, the Facility Manager (or designee) will
give direction to personnel regarding site staffing/closure.
8.5 Seismic Event
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Earthquakes may strike with little to no advance warning. As such, when an earthquake
does occur, it is important to stay as safe as possible. Be aware that some earthquakes
are actually fore-shocks and a larger earthquake may subsequently occur. Also, be
aware that many earthquakes are accompanied by aftershocks after the main event has
occurred. If an earthquake occurs minimize your movements to a few steps to a nearby
safe place and if you are indoors stay there until the shaking has stopped and you are
sure exiting is safe.
26
Packet Pg. 216
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
The following actions should be followed for personnel indoors:
Drop to the ground and take cover by getting under a sturdy piece of furniture and
you, cover your face and head with your arms and crouch in an inside corner of the
building.
Stay away from glass, windows, outside doors and walls, and anything that could
fall such as lighting fixtures or furniture.
Use a doorway for shelter only if it is in close proximity to you and if you know it is a
strongly supported load-bearing doorway.
Stay inside until the shaking stops and it is safe to go outside.
The following actions should be followed for personnel outdoors:
If you are already outdoors stay there.
Move away from buildings, structures, light poles, and utility wires.
Once in the open stay there until the shaking stops to prevent being hit by falling debris.
Following seismic events, the site facility will be evaluated by O&M personnel for
damage. All repairs will be performed under standard operational procedures.
9. Cybersecurity
Cyber security testing should be an integral part of the energy storage system lifecycle;
systems should be secure by design. Once in operation, ensure continuous secure
operation by monitoring, risk assessment and patching.
A process should be created and put in place to ensure continuous hardening of the
energy storage system. The principle of hardening is making sure that the attack surface
to site and equipment is limited by:
Only necessary network service ports should be open, others should be closed.
Only necessary software should be installed on the device, other software should
be removed.
Development environments and source code should not be installed on production
devices.
Remote access protocols that use plain text communication should not be used.
Software that stores passwords unencrypted should not be used.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
27
Packet Pg. 217
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Acronyms
AC Alternating Current
AED Automated External Defibrillator
CAMEO Computer-Aided Management of Emergency Operations
CHEMTREC Chemical Shipping Regulation & Incident Support
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
DC Direct Current
DHS Department of Homeland Security
EMS Emergency Medical Services
ERP Emergency Response Plan
FDC Fire Department Connection
HAZMAT Hazardous Materials
ICS Incident Command System
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets
NESC National Electric Safety Code
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NRC National Response Center (U.S. EPA)
NWS National Weather Service
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
O&M Operations and Maintenance
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
SDS Safety Data Sheets
SERC State Emergency Response Commission
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
SME Subject Matter Expert
28
Packet Pg. 218
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendices
Appendix 1: Map of Site
\[To include site boundaries, primary and secondary (etc.) entrances, emergency information
notice board, emergency stop switch, first aid kit location(s), AED location(s), fire department
connections, emergency spill kit location, etc.\]
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
29
Packet Pg. 219
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 2: Evacuation Map
\[To include primary and alternate evacuation routes, exits, primary muster point, and secondary
muster point\]
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
30
Packet Pg. 220
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 3: Referenced Titles and Roles
Note that some of these responsibilities may be combined within the duties of single individuals.
Company Regional Manager: A Company Regional Manager is an individual not directly
responsible for the day to day operation of the site, nor for the immediate response during or
immediately after an emergency, but who does bear responsibility for post-event assessment
and broader planning, recovery, and learning from experience. The Regional Manager would
typically bear the responsibility for ensuring incident records are maintained. Such a manager
should also ensure a safety-based culture pervades across sites and ensure that O&M
Managers are ensuring that training for safety is at the core of operations.
Emergency Response Contractor: An Emergency Response Contractor is an outside
organization or individual who is contracted to undertake certain aspects of emergency
response (e.g. spill management) but is not otherwise responsible for the strategic coordination
of a response, nor is part of typical operation of a site. Care should be taken to ensure such
contractors understand the broader picture of site safety and are aware of broader emergency
response protocols (such as, but not limited to, the breadth of topics covered in this Plan).
Emergency Response Coordinator: The Emergency Response Coordinator takes control of
the emergency and any resources necessary until the emergency has been eliminated and the
necessary cleanup and/or restoration are complete. This person shall lead the incident
reporting. The emergency response coordinator is typically the O&M Manager; in her/his
absence, the Lead Technician or other designated person shall assume this role. All personnel
on site shall know who the Emergency Response Coordinator on duty is during their time on
site. Remote operators shall likewise know who the Emergency Response Coordinator is for
any given shift.
The Emergency Coordinator or a designee will be responsible for notifying the appropriate
regulatory agencies and, if necessary, the Emergency Response Contractor or mutual aid
groups. Appendix 2 includes a list of emergency contacts and agencies that may be notified in
the event of an emergency. The incident will be documented and kept on file.
The Emergency Response Coordinator will direct the following activities during an emergency:
Ensure the safety of all personnel.
Evaluate if operations in the affected area should be shut down.
Take precautions to prevent or limit the spread of fire or explosions.
Isolate affected area and provide direction for radio announcements.
Determine the source/cause of the emergency and evaluate the primary and secondary
hazards to allow a full-scale, safe response.
Ensure that appropriate internal and external notifications are made.
Coordinate outside assistance from public or private organizations.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Implement other appropriate response provisions as necessary.
The Emergency Response Coordinator should be accredited in accordance with NFPA 70/70E
and the National Electric Safety Code (NESC). If s/he is not, someone who is (e.g. the O&M
Manager) must be present in emergencies to interface with electrical equipment above 50 volts.
31
Packet Pg. 221
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Incident Commander: The on-scene ranking officer, representing the agency with incident
jurisdiction. The Incident Commander authorizes incident objectives and strategies that
1
collectively delineate a course of action. The Fire Department designates an Incident
Commander as the primary incident manager; it should not be used by civilian organizations
that are operating at an incident with emergency responders.
O&M Manager: The Operations and Maintenance Manager is the individual responsible for the
normal operation and upkeep of the energy storage system on a day to day basis. This includes
standard operating conditions and routine scheduled or responsive maintenance activities.
Lead Technician: A Lead Technician is an on- or off-site individual responsible for the
operation of a site from a performance and technical perspective. Such responsibilities may lie
with the O&M Manger or with a remote operator.
Site Manager: A Site Manager supervises the personnel for a site. The Site Manager is
Subject Matter Expert (SME): An individual and designated secondary contact with detailed
working knowledge of the energy storage system and incident command systems. The SME
should have ready access to information on state of the system, status and meaning of alarms,
and first responders, as well as others via information on the emergency information notice
board.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
1
Federal Highway Administration. Glossary. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/ics_guide/glossary.htm
32
Packet Pg. 222
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 4: Emergency Contacts
TITLE INDIVIDUAL TELEPHONE NUMBER
999-999-9999 - Office
O&M Manager / Emergency
Name
Coordinator
999-999-9999 - Cell
Subject Matter Expert Name 999-999-9999 Cell
Secondary SME Contact Name
999-999-9999 Cell
Manufacturer Safety
Name
999-999-9999 - Cell
Representative
Lead Technician Name
999-999-9999 - Cell
Alternate Emergency Contact Name
999-999-9999 - Cell
999-999-9999 - Office
Company Regional Manager Name
999-991-9999 - Cell
Company Asset Manager Name 999-999-9999 - Office
Company Control Center Operator On Duty
999-999-9999
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
33
Packet Pg. 223
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Emergency Services & Contactors Telephone Number
OFFSITE EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE
Fire/Police/Ambulance 911
State Police 911
Hospital: (\[Hospital name\]) 999-999-9999
\[Hospital address\]
EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE
CONTRACTOR
\[Contractor Company\] 999-999-9999
AGENCY NOTIFICATIONS
NRC (24-hour) (Report Oil Spills) 800-424-8802
999-999-9999
State Department of Public Health and
Environment
ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE
Police Department (non-emergency) 999-999-9999
State Poison and Drug Center 800-999-9999
U.S. Pipeline & Hazardous Material Safety 1-800-467-4922
Administration help line infocntr@dot.gov
EQUIPMENT ASSISTANCE
\[Equipment manufacturer point of contact\] 999-999-9999
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
34
Packet Pg. 224
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 5: Incident Report Form
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT REPORT
INITIAL CONTACT INFORMATION
(Check one): REPORTED/ACTUAL INCIDENT DRILL/EXERCISE
1. Date/Time of Notification: Report received by:
2. Reported by (name & phone number or radio call signs):
3. Company/agency and position (if applicable):
4. Incident address/descriptive location:
5. Agencies at the scene:
6. Known damage/casualties (do not provide names over unsecured communications):
CHEMICAL INFORMATION
7. Nature of emergency: (check all that apply)
___ Leak ___ Explosion ___ Spill ___ Fire ___ Derailment ___ Other
Description:
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
8. Name of material(s) released/placard number(s):
9. Release of materials:
Has ended Is continuing. Estimated release rate & duration:
10. Estimated amount of material which has been released:
11. Estimated amount of material which may be released:
35
Packet Pg. 225
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
12. Media into which the release occurred: ________ air ________ ground ________
water
13. Plume characteristics:
a. Direction (Compass direction of plume): c. Color:
b. Height of plume: d. Odor:
14. Characteristics of material (color, smell, liquid, gaseous, solid, etc)
15. Present status of material (solid, liquid, and gas):
16. Apparently responsible party or parties:
Note: THIS INCIDENT REPORT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE. IT CONTAINS SOME OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO REPORT
AN INCIDENT TO THE SERC. Go to www.ecy.wa.gov/epcra to obtain a reporting form for businesses to submit to the SERC.
This form can be used at an incident, if applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
17. Current weather conditions at incident site:
Wind From: Wind Speed (mph): Temperature (F): ______
Humidity (%): ______ Precipitation: Visibility: __________
18. Forecast:
19. Terrain conditions:
HAZARD INFORMATION
(From ERP, MSDS, CHEMTREC, or facility)
20. Potential hazards:
21. Potential health effects:
22. Safety recommendations:
23. Recommended evacuation distance:
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
IMPACT DATA
24. Estimated areas/ populations at risk:
25. Special facilities at risk:
36
Packet Pg. 226
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
26. Other facilities with HAZMAT in area of incident:
PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISIONS
27. Tools used for formulating protective actions
________ a. Recommendations by facility operator/responsible party
________ b. Emergency Response Plan
________ c. Material Safety Data Sheet
________ d. Recommendations by CHEMTREC
________ e. Results of incident modeling (CAMEO or similar software)
________ f. Other:
28. Protective action recommendations:
____ Evacuation ____Shelter-In-Place ____Combination ____No Action
____ Other
Time Actions Implemented
29. Evacuation Routes Recommended:
EXTERNAL NOTIFICATIONS
30. Notification made to:
National Response Center (Federal Spill Reporting) 1-800-424-8802
CHEMTREC (Hazardous Materials Information) 1-800-424-9300
State Emergency Response Commission
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
SERC written follow-up forms
31. Other Information:
Source: Washington State Emergency Response Commission. Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) Hazardous Materials
Emergency Response Plan TEMPLATE. September 2011. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/epcra
37
Packet Pg. 227
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 6: Bomb Threat Report
* * * KEEP CALLER ON THE LINE AS LONG AS POSSIBLE! * * *
Exact words of caller:
Questions to ask the caller:
1.When is the bomb going to explode?
2.Where is the bomb right now?
3.What kind of bomb is it?
4.What does the bomb look like?
5.Why did you set the bomb?
6.Where are you calling from?
7.What is your name?
Try to determine the following
IDENTITY:malefemaleadultjuvenile (age? )
VOICE: loudhigh-pitcheddeepraspypleasant
disguisedbroken Other:
ACCENT: localnot localforeignregional
RACE: CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian
Other:
SPEECH: educatedaverageilliterateobscene
Other:
MANNER: calmangryrationalirrationalcoherent
incoherentdeliberateself-righteouslaughingintoxicated
BACKGROUND NOISES:
office machines factory machines bedlam trains quiet
38
Packet Pg. 228
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
voicesmixed sounds airplanesmusictraffic
partyOther:
If the voice is familiar to you, who did it sound like?
Additional Information:
Date / / Time: : a.m./p.m.Received by:
39
Packet Pg. 229
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 7: Bomb Threat Checklist
Mail Threat:
1. Handle documents as little as possible to preserve fingerprints.
2. Hand deliver immediately to O&M Manager.
Phone Threat:
1. Complete Bomb Threat Form.
2. Deliver completed form to O&M Manager.
3. Notify Supervisor immediately.
O&M Manager:
1. Gather all information regarding threat.
2. Decide upon course of action.
3. Coordinate searches with proper authorities.
Suspicious Objects:
1. DO NOT TOUCH OR ATTEMPT TO MOVE!
2. Notify Police911.
Evacuation:
1. Announce over public address system, give location where to assemble. Do not use the
radio.
2. Enlist volunteers to remain and shut down site.
Re-entry:
1. Determined based on:
-
2. Full report prepared.
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
40
Packet Pg. 230
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 8:Chemical/Biological Agent Threat Report
***KEEP CALLER ON THE LINE AS LONG AS POSSIBLE***
Exact words of caller:
Questions to ask the caller:
1.What chemical or biological agent is it?
2.When is the agent going to be released?
(date)(time)
3.Where is it right now?
(Building)(Floor)(Room)
4.Who put it there?
5.What does it look like?
6.What will cause it to spread?
7.What will trigger it?
8.Where did you get the agent?
9.Why are you doing this?
10.What is your name?
11.What is your telephone number and address?
Try to determine the following
IDENTITY:malefemaleadultjuvenile (age? )
VOICE: loudhigh-pitcheddeepraspypleasant
disguisedbrokenOther:
ACCENT: localnot localforeignregional:
RACE: CaucasianBlackHispanicAsian
Other:
SPEECH: educatedaverageilliterateobscene
Other:
41
Packet Pg. 231
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
MANNER: calmangryrationalirrationalcoherent
incoherentdeliberateself-righteouslaughingintoxicated
BACKGROUND NOISES:
office machines factory machines bedlam trainsquiet
voicesmixed soundsairplanesmusictraffic
partyOther:
If the voice is familiar to you, who did it sound like?
Additional Information:
Date / / Time: : a.m./p.m.Received by:
42
Packet Pg. 232
C.1.e
Energy Storage Corporate Responsibility Initiative
Emergency Response Plan
Appendix 9: Chemical/Biological Agent Threat Checklist
Mail Threat:
_____ 1. Handle documents as little as possible to preserve fingerprints.
_____ 2. Hand-deliver immediately to O&M Manager.
Telephone Threat:
_____ 1. Complete the Chemical/Biological Threat Report form.
_____ 2. Deliver completed form to O&M Manager immediately.
O&M Manager:
_____ 1. Gather all information regarding threat.
_____ 2. Decide upon course of action.
Searches:
_____ 1. ComprehensiveTo be conducted by trained law enforcement personnel only.
Suspicious Objects:
_____ 1. Do not touch or attempt to move.
_____ 2. Notify police.
Evacuation:
_____ 1. Make a site-wide announcement and give location where to assemble.
_____ 2. Enlist volunteers to remain and shut down site.
Re-entry:
_____ 1. Determined based on:
Attachment: 20211124_13631_Condor BESS_RTC (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
_____ a. -
_____ b.
_____ 2. Full report prepared.
43
Packet Pg. 233
C.1.f
CONDOR ENERGYSTORAGEPROJECT
Project Description
Prepared for:
CondorEnergyStorage,LLC
Prepared by:
SEPTEMBER2021
Packet Pg. 234
C.1.f
Attachment: Letter of Intent_ Condor Project Description (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.
Packet Pg. 235
C.1.f
Table of Contents
SECTIONPAGENO.
ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................................II
1PROJECTDESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................................1
1.1Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1
1.2Project Location......................................................................................................................................1
1.3Project Objectives...................................................................................................................................1
1.4Environmental Setting............................................................................................................................2
1.5Project Characteristics...........................................................................................................................3
1.6Construction............................................................................................................................................6
1.7Operations and Maintenance Activities................................................................................................9
1.8Decommissioning................................................................................................................................10
2REQUESTEDDISCRETIONARYAPPROVALS....................................................................................................11
3REFERENCESCITED.......................................................................................................................................11
APPENDICES
AEnergy Storage Equipment Photos
FIGURES
1-1Project Vicinity...................................................................................................................................................12
1-2Project Site........................................................................................................................................................13
TABLES
1-1Site Grading and Preparation Equipment...........................................................................................................8
12655.06
iSeptember 2021
Packet Pg. 236
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
Acronymsand Abbreviations
AcronymDefinition
alternating current
AC
battery energy storage system
BESS
best management practice
BMP
California Independent System Operator
CAISO
direct current
DC
kilovolt
kV
supervisory control and data acquisition
SCADA
South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCAQMD
Southern CaliforniaEdison
SCE
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
USFWS
12655.06
iiSeptember 2021
Packet Pg. 237
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
1Project Description
1.1Introduction
This project descriptionhas been prepared byCondorEnergy Storage,LLC(applicant),forthe City of Grand Terrace
(City), which is the lead agency, for the proposed approximately 200-megawatt battery energy storage system
(BESS) located on an approximately 10-acre parcel of land located at 21660 Main Street in the City of Grand
Terrace,California.
The proposed projectwill consistof lithium-ionenergy batteries installed in racks,inverters,switchgear,and other
associated equipment todirectlyinterconnect into theSouthern California Edison (SCE) Highgrove Substation (point
of interconnection)located immediately adjacent to the northern property limits. The batterieswillbe installed in
either containers or purpose-built enclosures, which will bedesigned for aesthetic compatibility with the
surrounding area.The containerswillhave battery storage racks separated with relay and communications systems
for automated monitoring and managing of the batteries to ensure design performance. Batteriesoperate with
direct current (DC) electricity that must be converted to alternating current (AC) for compatibility with the existing
electric grid. Power inverters to convert between AC and DC maybe located outside the containers or purpose-built
enclosures,along with transformers to step up the voltage.
The proposed facility will provide a service to the regional electric grid by receiving energy (charging) from theSCE
Highgrove Substation, storing energyon the site, and then later delivering energy (discharging) back to the point of
interconnectionwhen needed. Following construction, the proposed use will not emit pollutants, will not require
sanitary facilities, and will not require water except for limited maintenance activities.
1.2Project Location
The subject property consists of 9.86acres on Assessor’s Parcel Number116-715-177in the City of Grand
Terrace, California (see Figure 1-1, Project Vicinity). It is approximately 0.35miles from the nearest highway
interchange (Interstate 215\[I-215\]).
The project site is primarily undeveloped, with a single structure located in the southeast corner adjacent to Main
Street(see Figure 1-2, Project Site). The site is boundedto the east by Taylor Street, to the south by Main Street, and
to the west by the BNSF Railway. Land immediately to the north consists of the existing Highgrove Substation,where
the facility willinterconnect. Grand Terrace High School and the Brook Church are located east of Taylor Street.
1.3Project Objectives
The proposed project willprovidethe Cityof Grand Terrace and the State of California with areliable,economically
sounddevelopment to receive, store,and discharge electricity from the SCE-controlled electric grid, including
renewable energy produced by existing solar and wind resources in the region. Construction of the project will
accomplish the followingobjectives:
12655.06
1September 2021
Packet Pg. 238
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
Establish a new energy storage facility to reliably capture and manage renewable energy in an economically
feasible and commercially financeable manner.
Provide economic benefit to the City, the region, and the state, through construction jobs, property and
sales taxes, and increased energy efficiency and gridreliability.
Use proven and established energy storage technology that is efficient, requires low maintenance, and is
recyclable.
Assist California in meetingitsgreenhouse gas emissions reduction goalsby 2020 and 2030 as required
by the California Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill32), as amended by Senate Bill 32 in 2016.
Provide the region with a battery energy storage facility with the ability to help avoid the challenges recently
experienced with rolling blackouts by allowing renewable energy to be stored on site and provide
approximately 200,000 homes with power when needed.
1.4Environmental Setting
ExistingZoning
The project site is designated as M-2 (Industrial)under the City’s zoning ordinance. Per the City’sGeneral Plan
Land Use Element(City of Grand Terrace 2010), the parcel is designated as Industrial Land Use.
Dudek conducted a desktop review to evaluate potential resourceson the project site, which are describedinthe
following paragraphs.
BiologicalResources
Dudek reviewed California Department of Fish and Wildlife records (including the California Natural Diversity
Database\[CDFW 2020\])and federally designated critical habitat from the U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service(USFWS)
(2020a) within a 10-mile radius of the project site to determine the potential for special-status wildlife and plant
species to occur in the vicinity of the project site. The City’s General Plan identifies 15 special-statusspecies with
the potential to occur within Grand Terrace (City of Grand Terrace 2010). Based on a desktop review of the USFWS
Information for Planning and Consultation data(USFWS 2020b), the following special-status species have the
potential to occur at the project site: San Bernardino Merriam’s kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus),
Stephens’s kangaroo rat (D.stephensi \[D. cascus\]),coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica
californica),least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus),
Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae), Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis),
Gambel’s watercress (Rorippa gambellii), San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila), Santa Ana River woolly-star
(Eriastrum densifolium ssp.sanctorum), and slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras). No USFWS-
designated critical habitat occurswithin the project boundary or in the vicinity of the site.
The project site may contain wetlands. As project development progresses, wetlands will be managed in
accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other agency
guidelines. Typical strategies in dealing with wetlands on project sites include avoidance, minimization of impacts,
and mitigation.
12655.06
2September 2021
Packet Pg. 239
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
CulturalResources
The project site isnot located within a known area of Native American cultural sensitivity. Basedon the City’s
General Plan, a number of sites within the City have been recorded as containing cultural resources, but there are
no known areas of the City that have been previously identified as places of historical, cultural, or archaeological
significance that should be identified as significant and preserved as open space (City of Grand Terrace 2010). The
City does not provide specific information on paleontological sensitivity areas,but it should be noted thatportions
ofthe site aremostly disturbed and that paleontological resources, if present,are most likely to occurbelow depths
of at least 3feet.
GeologyandSoils
The faults closest to the project site arepart of the San Bernardino Valley section of the San Jacinto Fault. The
project site is not located within an Alquist-PrioloEarthquake Fault Zone. No known active faults are located within
the City limits (City of Grand Terrace 2010).
Noise
The project site is in anundeveloped industrial areawith railroad tracks immediately to the west and the Highgrove
Substation immediately to the north. Consequently, noise sources affecting noise levels on site and in the project
site vicinity include industrial operations and electrical generation facility operations. Operational noise levels will
be compatible with existing noise inthe area including the adjacent Highgrove substation and willnot exceed noise
limits as specified in the City’s Zoning Ordinance.
1.5Project Characteristics
The proposed project willinclude the development of energy storage facilities and associated infrastructure. The
proposed BESS willbe housed in enclosures that may consist of modular battery units. Power released or captured
by the proposed project willbe transferred to/fromthegrid via an interconnection to the SCE Highgrove Substation.
The project willconsistof lithium-ionenergy batteries, which willbeinstalled in racks;inverters;switchgear;and
other associated equipment. The project willinclude the following components, which are described in more detail
following the bulleted list:
EnergyStorageEnclosures: Energy storage enclosures and appurtenanceswill be constructedthat will
provide energy storage capacity for the electric grid.
PowerInvertersandTransformers: Power inverters to convert between AC and DC willbe located outside the
energy storage enclosures,along with transformers that willstep up the voltage.
CollectorElectricalYard: A collector electrical yard willbe installed that willinclude the open rack, air
insulated switch gear,and the main power transformer to step up from 34.5kilovolts (kV)to 115kV.
CommunicationEquipment: Communication equipment, including a remote terminal unit, fiber-optic
cabling,and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), will be installed.
SiteAccessandSecurity: On-site access driveways,perimeter security fencing,and nighttime directional
lightingwill be provided for the project.
12655.06
3September 2021
Packet Pg. 240
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
The facilities are intended to operate year-round and willbe available to receive or deliver energy 24 hours a day,
365 days a year.
BatteryEnergyStorageSystemEnclosures
The energy storage batteries willbe housed in containers or purpose-built enclosures (see Appendix A). The BESS
will be designed and installed in conformance with the nationally recognized National Fire ProtectionAssociation
(NFPA) 855 Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, along with all applicable state
and Cityfire protection requirements. The BESSwillnot be staffed, with remote operational control and periodic
inspections and maintenance performed as necessary.
BatteriesandRacks
The lithium-ion batteries willbe housed in racks similar to common computer server racks(see Appendix A).The
racks are typically made of aluminum,but sometimes may be composed of steel.The lithium-ion technology is
considered one of the safest, most easily understood, and most efficient methods of energy storage on the market.
The proposed facility willuse a lithium-ion technologythat has a long lifespan and boasts superior safety and
stability characteristics.
FireProtectionandFireSuppressionFeatures
The applicant willuse batteries that are UL certified and include built-in fail-safes and multi-layered fire protection
features designed to prevent thermal runaway and the spread of fire. A project fire protection plan and fire
suppression plan will be established to ensure fire safety on the project site.
Key features of the project’s fire protection plan willinclude the following:
Battery supplier selection and resulting detailed design will comply with California Fire Code Section 1206
and NFPA 855, as applicable.
Inverters will have the necessary UL certification.
Battery design, AC power, and collection system will meet all applicable National Electrical Code (NEC) and
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) codes and standards.
Battery cells/modules/racks will be cooled with a circulating water/glycol mixture.
The BESS will continuously monitor cell voltage and temperature and will shut the system down for any
abnormalities.
Lithium-ion batteries will be UL 9540 A tested to demonstrate prevention of fire propagation.
Battery enclosureor facility will include off-gas detectors/infrared monitors to provide early warning for
thermal runaway scenarios.
Battery enclosuredesigns will include deflagration vents and/or pressure panels to relieve buildup of off
gases and prevent explosions.
Layout will be designed to comply with International Fire Code 2018, as applicable.
Key features of the project’s fire suppression plan will include the following:
First responder training will be developed in conjunction with the battery original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) and the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractor.
12655.06
4September 2021
Packet Pg. 241
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
HighgroveSubstationInterconnection
The BESS willstore energy and will be interconnected to the Highgrove Substation located immediately adjacent to
the northwestern project limits. The interconnection willbe an overheadconnection to the Highgrove Substation.
The project will tie into the Highgrove Substation at an open bay position at the substation.
The project will include the following SCE interconnection facility improvements at Highgrove Substation:
New facilities for a new 115 kV switchrack position to include the following: one115 kV dead-end structure;
three115 kV voltage transformers with steel pedestal support structures;and three115 kV line drops
Two line current differential relays, to be specified during final engineering
Communication infrastructure, including the following: remote terminal unitand associated equipment;
supporting line protection and the TRU requirements for interconnection; and fiber-optic cable, including
conduit and vaults to extendinto the communication room
Metering facilities to meter the charging demand at the generating facility
The project will also include the following distribution upgrades:
Highgrove Substation
o Install one 115 kV line position which includes the following equipment:
Two 115 kV circuit breakers
One 115 kV group operated disconnect switch with grounding attachment
Three 115 kV group operated disconnect switches
Conduct ground grid study
OutdoorElectricalEquipment
Switchgear and additionally requiredelectrical equipment willbe installed.Depending on the battery manufacturer,
inverters could be located either inside or outside the BESS enclosures.Underground wires and cabling willrun
from the battery cable collection box (inside the enclosure) to a concrete pad housing the transformers and
inverters. All outside electrical equipment willbe housed in the appropriate National Electrical Manufacturers
Association(NEMA)rated enclosures. All outside electrical cabling on the site willbe run underground.
Inverters
The applicantuses only industry standard, nationally (and internationally) recognized electrical equipment. These
inverters are unattended, stand-alone units that operate in all conditions. They operate in both a chargemodeand a
discharge mode. They are UL listedfor bi-directional use and are monitored and controlled remotely. There willbe
on-site disconnects in the case of an emergency or unscheduled maintenance. In the case of any grid disturbance on
the SCEside, the inverters willnot operate until they are remotely turned back on or the grid instability is stabilized for
a set length of time. In the discharge mode, they are turned on remotely and controlled by internal circuitry and power
control software at the facility. They are robust in their design and are designed to last more than 30 years.
12655.06
5September 2021
Packet Pg. 242
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
CommunicationEquipment
The proposed project willalso require communication equipmentto meet the communication requirements for
interconnecting with the SCEfacilities and to support remote project operations monitoring. To provide for
communication with SCEfacilities, a fiber-optic cable willbe placed along the overhead protective ground wire (OPGW)
connecting the project site generation step-up (GSU) transformer with the SCEpoint of interconnection. Utility
interconnection regulations require the installation of a second,separate, redundant fiber-optic cable. The redundant
fiber-optic cable willalso be installed within the project footprint.
The project willuse local exchange carrier services for communication to support remote monitoring requirements.
The project willconnect to communication fiber-optic lines owned and managed by local telecommunication
providers. The enclosureholding the connection equipment willhave a base of approximately 4 feet by 2 feet and
willbe approximately 5 feet in height. From the point of demarcation, afiber-optic cable willbe installed within the
project footprint to connect the enclosureto the SCADA equipment.
The SCADA system is critical to the CAISOand SCEutility interconnection, and for the proper operation and
maintenance of the project. The SCADA system will useproprietary softwareand afiber-optic transmission systemto
connect the project to the Highgrove Substation. The SCADA system functions as a remote start, stop, reset, and tag
out for the facility, thus minimizing the labor and site diagnostic information generated from the panels. The SCADA
system willalso control the collector electrical yard, allowing for fully centralized operation of the project to meet all
CAISO and utility interconnection requirements.
SiteAccessandSecurity
The project site can be accessed directly from Main Street or Taylor Road. I-215runs north–southin the project
vicinity and is located to the west of the project site. Main Street connects to I-215 via South Iowa Avenue
approximately 0.35miles from the project site,providing regionalaccess to the project site.Nonew roads willbe
required to provide access to the project site. The project’smain entrance will be along Main Street.
Allfenceinstallationrequirementswillbeevaluated,andthebest-fitscenariowillbeincorporatedon theproject
sitebasedontheCity’sfinaldetermination.Thefenceswillbeinstalledaroundtheperimeterofthe project
siteforsafetyandsecuritypurposes.Thefencingwillremainforthelife ofthe project.Along Taylor Street and
Main Street, walls may be constructed for aesthetic purposes and to meet City requirements.
Permanent motion-sensitive, directional security lights willbe installed to provide adequate illumination around the
collector electrical yard areas and points of ingress/egress. All lighting willbe shielded and directed downward to
minimize the potential for glare or spillover onto adjacent properties. Security cameras will be placed on site and
monitored 7days a week and 24 hours a day.
1.6Construction
ScheduleandWorkforce
Theconstructionoftheproposedprojectwilllastbetween8and10months.Constructionactivitiesforthe
proposedprojectgenerally fallinto threemaincategories:(1)sitepreparation;(2)systeminstallation;and (3)
testing, commissioning,and cleanup.
12655.06
6September 2021
Packet Pg. 243
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
The on-site construction workforce is expected to peak at up to 75 individuals; however, the average daily workforce
on site during construction is expected to be approximately 50individuals, comprisingconstruction, supervisory,
support, and construction management personnel.It is anticipated that the construction workforce willcommute to
the site each day from local communities and report to the designated construction staging yards prior to the beginning
of each workday. Construction staff not drawn from the local labor pool willstay in local hotels in Riverside, San
Bernardino,or other local communities. Deliveries of equipment and materials willgenerate an estimated fiveround-
trips per day during peak construction periods.
The proposed project willbe constructed by several specialized construction contractors. Construction willprimarily
occur during daylight hours, Monday through Friday, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., as required to meet the
construction schedule. Any construction work performed outside the normal work schedule willbe coordinated with
the appropriate agencies and willconform to Cityregulations.
SiteGradingandEarthwork
Construction activities areexpected to include excavation and grading of the project site. Site preparation and
construction willoccur in accordance with all federal, state, and Cityzoning codes and requirements. Noise-
generating construction activities willbe limited to Monday through Friday, between 7:00a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The
site is located in a primarily industrial area, with residential neighborhoods located across Main Street
approximately 0.10 miles southeast and southwest of the project site, and Grand Terrace High School located east
of Taylor Street. The contractor willconduct construction activities in such a manner that the maximum noise levels
at the affected buildings willnot exceed established noise levels.
All applicable local, state, and federal requirements and best management practices (BMPs) willbe incorporated
into the construction activities for the project site. Beginning work on the project site willinvolve preparing the land
for installation of the BESS-related infrastructure, access driveways, and temporary construction staging areas. The
construction contractor willbe required to incorporate BMPs consistent with the Cityzoning ordinance and with
guidelines provided in the California Stormwater Quality Association’s ConstructionBest Management Practice
Handbook(CASQA 2019), as well as a soil erosion and sedimentation control plan to reduce potential impacts
related to construction of the proposed project. Prior to initial construction mobilization, pre-construction surveys
willbe performed and sediment and erosion controls willbe installed in accordance with Cityand state guidelines.
Stabilized construction entrances and exits willbe installed at driveways to reduce tracking of sediment onto
adjacent public roadways.
Site preparation willbe consistent with South Coast Air Quality ManagementDistrict (SCAQMD) rules for dust
control. Site preparation willinvolve the removal and proper disposal of existing vegetation and debris that would
unduly interfere with project construction or the health and safety of on-site personnel. Dust-minimizing techniques
willbe employed, such as maintaining natural vegetation where possible, using a mow-and-roll vegetation clearance
strategy, placement of wind control fencing, application of water, and application of dust suppressants.
Conventional grading willbe performed throughout the project site but minimized to the maximum extent possible
to reduce unnecessary soil movement that may result in dust. Earthworks scrapers, excavators, dozers, water
trucks, paddlewheels, haul vehicles, and graders may all be used to perform grading. Land-leveling equipment,
such as a smooth steel drum roller, willbe used to even the surface of the ground and to compact the upper layer
of soil to a value recommended by a geotechnical engineer for structural support. Soil movement from grading will
be balanced on the site, and no import or export of soils willoccur.
12655.06
7September 2021
Packet Pg. 244
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
Trenching willbe required for placement of underground electrical and communication lines, and may include the
use of trenchers, backhoes, excavators, haul vehicles, compaction equipment, and water trucks. After preparation
of the site, the pads for enclosures, equipment enclosures, and equipment vaults willbe prepared per geotechnical
engineer recommendations. The switchyard areas willhave a grounding grid installed and willbe covered with
aggregate surfacing for safe operation.
During this work, there willbe multiple crews working on the site with various equipment and vehicles, including
special vehicles for transporting the batteries and other equipment. As the BESS enclosures are constructed, the
electrical collection and communication systems willbe installed. The wiring willconnect to the appropriate
electrical and communication terminations and the circuits willbe checked and commissioned prior to operation.
It is estimated that site grading and preparation willrequire the equipmentlisted in Table 1-1.
Table1-1.SiteGradingandPreparationEquipment
EquipmentTypePreliminaryQuantity
1
Bulldozer (e.g., CAT D7)
1
Grader (e.g., CAT D7)
2
Scraper (15–30 cubic yard)
1
Water truck (3,000–5,000 gallon)
1
Self-propelled compactor
1
Dump truck
1
Tractor/loader/backhoe (e.g., Case 590)
1
Bobcat
ConstructionWaterUse
During construction of the proposed project, water willbe required for common construction-related purposes,
including but not limited to dust suppression, soil compaction, and grading. Dust-control water may be used for
ingress and egress of on-site construction vehicle equipment traffic and for the construction of the energy storage
equipment. A sanitary water supply willnot be required during construction, because restroom facilitieswillbe
provided by portable units to be serviced by licensed providers.
During the 6-to 8-month construction period, the water used is anticipated to be supplied by purchasing water from
the local water purveyor and connecting to the existing recycled water stub at the front of the project site. Water
demand during construction is expected to be the same if the project is constructed during a year with normal
precipitation, a year with less-than-average precipitation, or a multiple-year period of less-than-average precipitation.
SolidandNonhazardousWaste
The project site willproduce a small amount of solid waste from construction activities.This may include paper,
wood, glass, plastics from packing material, waste lumber, insulation, scrap metal and concrete, empty
nonhazardous containers, and vegetation waste. These wastes willbe segregated, where practical, for recycling.
Non-recyclablewastes willbe placed in covered dumpsters and removed on a regular basis by a certified waste-
handling contractor for disposal at a Class III (nonhazardous waste) landfill. Vegetation waste generated by site
clearing and grubbing willbe chipped/mulchedand spread on site or hauled off site to an appropriate green
waste facility.
12655.06
8September 2021
Packet Pg. 245
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
HazardousMaterials
The hazardous materials used for construction willbe typical of most construction projects of this type.Materials
willinclude small quantities of gasoline, diesel fuel, oils, lubricants, solvents, detergents, degreasers, paints,
ethylene glycol, dust palliatives, herbicides, and welding materials/supplies. A hazardous materials business plan
willbe provided to the City. The hazardous materials business plan willinclude a complete list of all materials used
on site and information regarding how the materials willbe transported and in what form they willbe used. This
information willbe recorded to maintain safety and prevent possible environmental contamination or worker
exposure. During project construction, material safety data sheets for all applicable materials present at the site
willbe made readily available to on-site personnel.
HazardousWaste
Small quantities of hazardous waste willmost likely be generated over the course of construction. These wastes
may include waste paint, spent construction solvents, waste cleaners, waste oil, oily rags, waste batteries, and
spent welding materials. Workers willbe trained to properly identify and handle all hazardous materials. Hazardous
waste willbe either recycled or disposed of at a permitted and licensed treatment and/or disposal facility. All
hazardous waste shipped off site for recycling or disposal willbe transported by a licensed andpermitted hazardous
waste hauler.
1.7Operations and Maintenance Activities
Typical operations and maintenanceactivities that willoccur on the project site during operation include, but are
not limited to, liaison and remote monitoring,administration and reporting,semi-annual and annual services,
remote operations of inverters,site security and management,and additional communication protocols, as well as
repair and maintenance oftheBESS, electrical transmission lines, and other project facilities. The project is
expected to charge and discharge daily, upon SCE grid demand and willbe remotely operated in conjunction with
SCE’s sub-transmission system demands. It is anticipated thatprimary charging willtake place during the peak of
the day, when there is excess solar capacity, and willbe discharged in the evening, when the sun is going down.
The electrical equipment;heating, ventilation, and air conditioning;fire protection systems;and security willbe
automated and monitored remotely. The site willbe unoccupiedand remotely operatedbut visited periodically for
equipment inspections, monitoring and testing, security, landscaping, and maintenance as needed. Periodically,
batteries and various components willbe replaced or renewed to ensure optimal operation.
Stormwater willbe treated in accordance with Cityrequirements. Outdoor equipment willbe sealed or enclosed
and willnot affect stormwater quality.
SolidandNonhazardousWaste
The project willproduce a small amount of waste associated with maintenance activities, which could include broken
and rusted metal, defective or malfunctioning modules, electrical materials, empty containers, and other
miscellaneous solid waste, including the typical refuse generated by workers. Most of these materials willbe collected
and delivered back to the manufacturer or to recyclers. Non-recyclable waste willbe placed in covered dumpsters
and removed on a regular basis by a certified waste-handling contractor for disposal at a Class III landfill.
12655.06
9September 2021
Packet Pg. 246
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
HazardousMaterials
Limited amounts of hazardous materials willbe stored or used on the site during operations, including diesel fuel,
gasoline,and motor oil for vehicles;mineral oil to be sealed within the transformers;and lead-acid-based batteries for
emergency backup. Appropriate spill containment and cleanup kits willbe maintained during operation of the project.
A spill prevention control and countermeasuresplan willbe developed for site operations.
HazardousWaste
Fuels and lubricants used in operations willbe subject to the spill prevention control and countermeasuresplan to
be prepared for the proposed project. Solid waste, if generated during operations, willbe subject to the material
disposal and solid waste management plan to be prepared for the proposed project.
SecurityandLighting
The proposed project willbe fenced to help prevent access by the public. Gates willbe installed at the road
entrance(s). Limiting access to the project site isnecessary both to ensure the safety of the public and to protect
the equipment from potential theft and vandalism.
Theproject’s lighting system willprovide operations and maintenancepersonnel with illumination for both normal
and emergency conditions. Lighting willbe designed to provide the minimum illumination needed to achieve safety
and security objectives. Additionally, lighting willbe directed downward and shielded to focus illumination on the
desired areas only and to minimize light trespass.
1.8Decommissioning
At the end of the proposed project’s operational term, the applicant may determine that the project site should be
decommissioned and deconstructed, or it may seek an extension of its conditional use permit. The proposed project
willinclude BMPs to ensure the collection and recycling of batteries and to avoid the potential for batteries to be
disposed of as municipal waste.
All decommissioning and restoration activities willadhere to the requirements of the appropriate governing
authorities and willbe in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and Cityregulations. Following the expiration
of a power purchase agreement for the proposed project, the applicant may, at its discretion, choose to enter into
subsequent power purchase agreements or to decommission and remove the system and its components. The
project site could then be converted to other uses in accordance with the applicable land use regulations in effect
at that time.
It is anticipated that during project decommissioning, project enclosures willbe removed from the ground on the
project site. Aboveground equipment that willbe removed includesinverters, transformers, electrical wiring, and
equipment on the inverter pads. Equipment willbe de-energized prior to removal, salvaged (where possible), placed
in appropriate shipping containers, and secured in a truck transport trailer for shipment off site to be recycled or
disposed of at an appropriately licensed disposal facility. Site infrastructure willbe removed, including the fences
and the concrete pads that may support the inverters, transformers, and related equipment. The demolition debris
and removed equipment may be cut or dismantled into pieces that can be safely lifted or carried with the equipment
being used. The fencing and gates willbe removed, and all materials willbe recycled to the extent feasible. The
12655.06
10September 2021
Packet Pg. 247
C.1.f
C ONDOR E NERGY S TORAGE P ROJECT
area willbe thoroughly cleaned and all debris willbe removed. A collection and recycling program willbe executed
to promote recycling of project components and minimize disposal in landfills.
2Requested Discretionary Approvals
Based on a review of the City zoning code and discussions with the City to date, this application package includes
the request for the following discretionary permit:
Conditional use permit
3References Cited
CASQA (California Stormwater Quality Association). 2019. Construction BMP Handbook. December 2019.
https://www.casqa.org/resources/bmp-handbooks.
CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2020. California Natural Diversity Database quadrant search:
San Francisco South. Accessed September 2020. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data.
City of Grand Terrace. 2010. Grand Terrace General Plan. Adopted April 27, 2010.
USFWS (U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service). 2020a. USFWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat
Report. Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS). Accessed September 2020.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/critical-habitat.
USFWS. 2020b. IPaC: Information for Planning and Consultation. Online project planning tool.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/.
12655.06
11September 2021
Packet Pg. 248
C.1.f
Kern County
58
15
Barstow
14
40
395
SAN
48
BERNARDINO
Adelanto
Victorville
Los Angeles
COUNTY
Apple Valley
County
18
138247
2
Hesperia
Big
173
Big
Bear Lake
Bear Lake Project Site
39
330
206
38
Upland
Yucca Valley
134
Highland
Rialto
210
Yucaipa
66
19
Loma Linda
83
10
60
Colton
72
Redlands
5771
10
91
605
90
243
215
405
111
22
74
55
133
15
241
Riverside
73
County
5
San Diego
0 ¢¨¥¨¢ /¢¤
79
76
County
Description\\Figure1-1_ProjectVicinity.mxd
Attachment: Letter of Intent_ Condor Project Description (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Project Site
Date: 10/14/2020 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\\Projects\\j1265500\\j1265506_CondorBatteryStorage\\MAPDOC\\DOCUMENT\\Project
SOURCE: ESRI World Topographic Basemap
FIGURE 1-1
Project Vicinity
02,0001,000
Feet
Condor Energy Storage Project
Packet Pg. 249
C.1.f
Description\\Figure1-2_ProjectSite.mxd
Attachment: Letter of Intent_ Condor Project Description (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Project Site
Date: 10/13/2020 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\\Projects\\j1265500\\j1265506_CondorBatteryStorage\\MAPDOC\\DOCUMENT\\Project
SOURCE: Bing Maps 2020; Open Street Map 2019
FIGURE 1-2
Project Site
015075
Feet
Condor Energy Storage Project
Packet Pg. 250
C.1.f
Appendix A
Energy Storage Equipment Photos
Attachment: Letter of Intent_ Condor Project Description (CUP 20-03, V 21-01, SA 20-09 and E 20-09)
Packet Pg. 251
C.1.f
A PPENDIX A
E NERGY S TORAGE E QUIPMENT P HOTOS
PhotoA-1: Typical modularbattery energy storage unit
PhotoA-2: Illustration of typical battery energy storage system enclosure and medium-voltage
transformers/inverters.
12655.06
A-1September 2021
Packet Pg. 252
COTG
SBJMSPBE
USBDLT
TDF
IJHIHSPWF
TVCTUBUJPO
SJWFSTJEF
GSFFXBZ
)J.326*
COTG
SBJMSPBE
USBDLT
COTG
SBJMSPBE
USBDLT
TDF
IJHIHSPWF
TVCTUBUJPO
SJWFSTJEF
GSFFXBZ
)J.326*
COTG
SBJMSPBE
USBDLT