Loading...
11-16-2017 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM The City of Grand Terrace complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk's office at (909) 824-6621 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. If you desire to address the Planning Commission during the meeting, please complete a Request to Speak Form available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Any documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City's website at www.grandterrace- ca.gov<http://www.grandterrace-ca.gov CALL TO ORDER Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Attendee NamePresentAbsentLateArrived Chairman Tom Comstock¨¨¨ Vice Chair Tara Ceseña¨¨¨ Commissioner Jeffrey Allen¨¨¨ Commissioner Edward A. Giroux¨¨¨ Commissioner Gregory A. Goatcher¨¨¨ APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC ADDRESS Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Planning and Development Services. This is the opportunity for membersof the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The City of Grand TerracePage 1 Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board November 16, 2017 Chairman may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. A.CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 06/01/2017 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 09/07/2017 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, Variance 17-01, Administrative Site and Architectural Review 17-02 and Environmental 16-14 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVE VARIANCE 17-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 16-03 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274) A SUBDIVISION OF A 0.42 ACRE INTO TWO LOTS LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167-161-32) and 3) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CALIFORNIA QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17-02 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,290 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON A 0.25 ACRE LOT CREATED BY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274, LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167- 161-32) DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Agenda Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board November 16, 2017 C.CONTINUED ITEMS 1. Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open the public hearing continued from October 19, 2017 to the present date to discuss the Staff Report; and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADDENDUM AND ADOPT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 17-03 AND ZONE CHANGE 17-01 AMENDING THE ZONING CODE AND REVISING THE ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE AGRICULTURAL-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS ADJOURN Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission Site and Architectural Review Board to be held on December 7, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. Agenda item requests must be submitted in writing t than 14 calendar days preceding the meeting. City of Grand Terrace Page 3 A.1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM The City of Grand Terrace complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk's office at (909) 824-6621 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. If you desire to address the Planning Commission during the meeting, please complete a Request to Speak Form available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Any documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City's website at www.grandterrace- ca.gov<http://www.grandterrace-ca.gov CALL TO ORDER Chairman Comstock convened the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board at 6:30p.m. Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Giroux. Attendee NameTitleStatusArrived Tom ComstockChairmanPresent Tara CeseñaVice ChairPresent Jeffrey AllenCommissionerPresent Edward A. GirouxCommissionerPresent Gregory A. GoatcherCommissionerLate6:42 PM APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1.Motion: AGENDA JUNE 1, 2016 Let the record reflect Commissioner Goather was not present during this vote. RESULT:ADOPTED \[4 TO 0\] AYES:Tom Comstock, Tara Ceseña, Jeffrey Allen, Edward A. Giroux AWAY:Gregory A. Goatcher PUBLIC ADDRESS There were no request to speak forms from the public. City of Grand TerracePage 1 Packet Pg. 4 A.1 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board June 1, 2017 A.CONSENT CALENDAR 2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 03/16/2017 RESULT: ACCEPTED \[4 TO 0\] MOVER: Jeffrey Allen, Commissioner SECONDER: Edward A. Giroux, Commissioner AYES: Tom Comstock, Tara Ceseña, Jeffrey Allen, Edward A. Giroux AWAY: Gregory A. Goatcher B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. An Amendment to Title 18 of the Municipal Code Amending Section 18.73.060 of Chapter 18.73 of the Zoning Code Relating to the Dedication, Improvement and Maintenance of Public Improvements Director Molina presented a staff report with a PowerPoint presentation, which she Examples of such maintenance include the landscaping of the perimeters of subdivisions, the removal and planting of trees, and graffiti cleanup. Typically, when cities create maintenance districts, there is an escalation factor which captures increased costs of living, utility costs for street lights, water costs, etc. Director Molina explained that the way Grand Terrace maintenance districts were set up, did not allow for such escalators. Since 1989 the City has not been able to increase rates without ore, City staff recommends that the zoning code be revised. Director Molina proposed the section heading of 18.73.060 be revised to include "maintenance" and under section 18.73060, paragraphs B and C would be added. Paragraph B states that all new development projects shall be annexed into the existing landscape and lighting maintenance district. Annexation into the landscape and lighting Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 1, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) maintenance district shall be required as a condition of approval for a subdivision, conditional use permit, or site and architectural review approval. Paragraph C states that the City may also require that maintenance of perimeter improvements also be included with the landscape and lighting assessment district. Public Address There were no request to speak forms from the public. City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Packet Pg. 5 A.1 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board June 1, 2017 Deliberations from Commission: There were no written communications regarding this item. Commissioner Giroux inquired if the ordinance would pertain to individuals as well as new construction developers. Director Molina explained that the amendment does not include personal additions to household, and only pertains to new projects. Commissioner Allen sought clarification about the special district's extra assessment for street lights in addition to property tax, which all residents pay, but do not all directly benefit from. In response, Assistant City Attorney Bettenhausen explained that the assessment districts can be placed on top of property taxes because that amount collected from property tax is not necessarily enough to pay for the cost of lights and landscaping maintenance. He also pointed out that it will be a condition of approval for all new development projects to be annexed into the lighting and landscaping assessment district. The objective of this ordinance is to have new development pay for its own benefits, i.e., street lights. Vice Chair Ceseña further explained the ordinance by comparing the landscape and lighting assessment district to an HOA overall, a number of commissioners were concerned with the extra assessment, as it appeared to be a double taxation. Commissioner Giroux sought further clarification asking Director Molina if residents without street lights are paying for street lights through their property taxes. Molina explained that indirectly, they do. Property taxes go into the City's general fund and a small percentage of that fund does pay the cost of street lights. However, the general fund is dispersed into multiple things, such as law enforcement. Chairman Comstock, along with Commissioners Allen and Giroux all voiced their support for the ordinance, as they see the benefits despite the extra fee. There was one public comment from resident Jeff McConnell who felt that the ordinance may be too broad. He felt tht there are many constituents who prefer not to have street Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 1, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) lights, like the neighbors on his street. The City needs to identify where lights need to be and who benefits from them. Commissioner Giroux responded that there is no doubt that street lights are important for pedestrians, police, drivers, and emergency vehicles. Vice Chair Ceseña added that while some things are used more personally from our tax dollars, others are not. City funds are not growing at same rate as new development. She supported the ordinance City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Packet Pg. 6 A.1 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board June 1, 2017 in efforts to get new development on track for the betterment of the City of Grand Terrace as a whole. 1) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND 2) ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL AND REPLACE SECTION 18.73.060 OF CHAPTER 18.73 (GENERAL REGULATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS) OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) RELATING TO THE DEDICATION, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESULT: APPROVED \[UNANIMOUS\] MOVER: Tom Comstock, Chairman SECONDER: Tara Ceseña, Vice Chair AYES: Comstock, Ceseña, Allen, Giroux, Goatcher C.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS Director Molina noted there was no information to the Commissioners, other than the announcement of "Community Day". D.INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS Chairman Comstock inquired about any updates on the development near the freeway. Director Molina shared that the property had been purchased from the City and that The Lewis Group is master planning the area. A specific plan will be required for 80-100 acres. Commissioner Goatcher asked about the tire recycle business, as he saw possible activity on site. Director Molina informed him that City Council did revoke the conditional use permit and tires are being removed from the site. The City is monitoring the site. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 1, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) Commissioner Allen asked for an update regarding the Habitat for Humanity project on Michigan Street. Director Molina said the project is undergoing a plan check. Commissioner Goatcher inquired about the possible widening of Westwood Street to which Director Molina replied that she is unsure but will speak with the City Manager and Public Works. City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Packet Pg. 7 A.1 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board June 1, 2017 Chairman Comstock sought a status report on an upcoming coffee shop. Director Molina reported that the applicants have submitted a first plan check and plans are moving forward. ADJOURN Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission to be held on June 15, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. _________________________________ _________________________________ Tom Comstock, Chairman of the Grand Sandra Molina, Director of Planning and Terrace Planning Commission Development Services Department Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 1, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) City of Grand Terrace Page 5 Packet Pg. 8 A.2 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board at 6:30 pm. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Jeffrey Allen. Attendee NameTitleStatusArrived Tom ComstockChairmanAbsent Tara CeseñaVice ChairAbsent Jeffrey AllenCommissionerPresent Edward A. GirouxCommissionerPresent Gregory A. GoatcherCommissionerPresent PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC ADDRESS Jeff McConnell, Grand Terrace announced the upcoming Lions Club Pancake Breakfast to be held on October 15, 2017 from 7:00 am to 11:00 am. Please contact any Lions Club member for tickets. A.CONSENT CALENDAR None. B.ACTION ITEMS None. City of Grand TerracePage 1 Packet Pg. 9 A.2 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 7, 2017 C.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Administrative Site and Architectural Review 17-08, Variance 17-02 and Environmental 17-06 Located at 22250 Carhart Avenue Sitting Chair Giroux opened the Public Hearing a 6:40 pm. Haide Aguirre, Assistant Planner gave the Power Point presentation for this item. Commissioner Goatcher asked whether or not the proposed garage would cause any drainage issues. Assistant Planner Aguirre stated the lot is flat and no drainage issues are expected. Commissioner Allen asked if there were any public utilities located within the easement which the project would encroach if the variance is approved. Planning and Development Services Director Sandra Molina explained that the Applicant would need written permission from the owner of the utility located in the easement before a permit can be issued for the project. Sitting Chair Giroux asked who owns the easement. Director Molina explained that the owner has not been identified as of this date. Jeffrey McConnell, Grand Terrace stated he noticed that the Assessor's Parcel Number for the property located in the staff report was incorrect and asked that the number be corrected on the record. Director Molina stated that was a typographical error and that the correct Assessor's Parcel Number, APN 0275-272-01 is reflected in the resolution. Applicant Randall Schnetz explained why he wanted to construct an additional garage and expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Sitting Chair Giroux asked the Applicant if he accepts the Condition of Approval that requires he plant a tree in front of the proposed garage and the planting of two (2) additional trees on the City's right-of-way. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Sep 7, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) Mr. Schnetz stated he agrees. Sitting Chair Giroux closed the Public hearing at 7:00 pm. 1) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, AND 2) ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA); GRANTING City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Packet Pg. 10 A.2 Minutes Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board September 7, 2017 VARIANCE 17-02, AND APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17-08 ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 650 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE WITHIN THE REAR YARD SETBACK, LOCATED AT CARHART AVENUE (APN 0275-272-10) RESULT: APPROVED \[UNANIMOUS\] MOVER: Jeffrey Allen, Commissioner SECONDER: Gregory A. Goatcher, Commissioner AYES: Jeffrey Allen, Edward A. Giroux, Gregory A. Goatcher ABSENT: Tom Comstock, Tara Ceseña D.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS None. E. INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Goatcher expressed his appreciation that the stripes in the crosswalks have been updated. Commissioner Allen commented on how the striping on the speed bumps in his neighborhood has changed from stripes to arrows. Sitting Chair Giroux stated he would not available for the Planning Commission scheduled on September 21, 2017. He also asked if something could be done about the timing of the signal light at the Barton Road Interchange. Director Molina explained she would defer that request to Public Works Director Alan French. ADJOURN Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission to be held on September 21, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Sep 7, 2017 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) _________________________________ _________________________________ Tom Comstock, Chairman of the Grand Sandra Molina, Director of Planning and Terrace Planning Commission Development Services Department City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Packet Pg. 11 This page left intentionally blank. B.3 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE:November 16, 2017 TITLE:Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, Variance 17-01, Administrative Site and Architectural Review 17-02 and Environmental 16- 14 PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION:1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVE VARIANCE 17-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 16-03 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274) A SUBDIVISION OF A 0.42 ACRE INTO TWO LOTS LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167-161- 32) and 3) Adopt ARESOLUTIONOFTHEPLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OFTHECITYOFGRANDTERRACE CALIFORNIA, ADOPTINGAN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CALIFORNIA QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17-02 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,290 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON A 0.25 ACRE LOT CREATED BY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274, LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167-161-32) 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This item supports Goal 3 to Promote Economic Development. PROPOSAL: Jai Ganesh LLC ("Applicant") represented by Edmundo Ilabaca of Futrono Engineering Inc., has submitted Tentative Parcel Map 16-03 (TPM No.18274) to subdivide a 0.42- acre lot, zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential into two parcels. Parcels 1 and 2 will measure 7,369 and 10,677 square feet,respectively. Parcel 1 has an existing residence and a Variance has been submitted to reduce the required 100-foot lot depth Packet Pg. 12 B.3 to 68-feet. A Site and Architectural Review application has been filed for the construction of a 2,290-square foot home with a 480-square foot two car garage on Parcel 2. Pursuant to the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council has final approval authority on the tentative parcel maps; however, the Planning Commission has reviewing authority and makes a recommendation to the City council on the Tentative Parcel Map. The Planning Commission has approval authority on Site and Architectural Review and Variance applications. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The Subject Property has a triangular shape, that gradually slopes down from the south towards the west. There is an existing residence on the east side of the property. The project fronts De Berry Street, which is a 66-foot wide collector street, no dedication is required for this development. The property is surrounded by R1-7.2 Single Family Residential on the Zoning Map and the designation is Low Density Residential on the General Land Use Map. All adjacent uses are residential; however, there is Commercial Manufacturing less than 200 feet away to the west. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan/Zoning Consistency The project site is designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed development is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation because it allows single family detached residential uses. The Project is consistent with the Circulation Element as street improvements shall be required and reviewed as part of this development. The Project is also consistent with the Housing Element which encourages infill housing and private development of underutilized land for residential construction by maintaining the physical character of existing low residential neighborhood. The project site is zoned R1-7.2 - Single Family Residential, this zoning designation permits single family uses. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the development standards of the zoning code relating to lot width and lot size. A Variance application has been submitted to reduce the lot depth requirement of Parcel 1, from the required 100 feet to an average depth of 68 feet. Additionally, the Site and Architectural review for the proposed single-family residence meets all zoning standards applicable to building setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements. Tentative Parcel Map/Conceptual Grading The Tentative Parcel Map shows the subdivision of the 0.42-acre lot, into two parcels. Proposed Parcel 1 contains the existing residence, and a new single family residence is proposed on Parcel 2. The project fronts De Berry Street, which is a 66-foot wide Packet Pg. 13 B.3 collector street. No dedication is required for this development; however, in accordance with the Zoning Code, the Applicant is required to complete all right-of-way improvements, including but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street light, street trees and asphalt paving to the center line of De Berry Street. The proposed lot gradually slopes from the street level at De Berry Street to the farthest north point of Parcel 2, and the grade difference between these two points is 12 feet over 194 feet. Minimal grading is needed to support the new residence. Variance The Applicant has applied for a Variance to deviate from the lot depth requirement for Parcel 1. Due to the triangular shape of the site, the design of Parcel 1 also results in a triangular shape. The angle of the hypotenuse is such that the depth of the lot is gradually reduced. At its deepest point the lot depth is 123.77 feet, and 0 at its shortest depth. The average depth is 68 feet. A special circumstance exists to support the Variance, because the triangular shape makes it infeasible for the lot depth to be met for Parcel 1. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege, but rather provide the applicant with the ability to subdivide the property into two lots. In addition, the granting of the Variance will not create negative impacts to the proposed and adjacent residences. Site Plan The proposed residence on Parcel 2 meets all the zoning site development standards, including building height and setbacks. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing perimeter chain link fence and replace it with a 6-foot-high block wall. Staff has included a Condition of Approval requiring the perimeter block walls to be decorative. Architectural Elevation and Floor Plan Parcel 1 has an existing residence. The Applicant is proposing to construct a one story 2,290 square foot single family residence with a 480-square foot, two car garage on Parcel 2. The proposed residence has a contemporary design and includes ample number of windows at the front and back facades, and stone veneer accents. The applicant is proposing an earth tone color pallet, which includes "Oakridge Estate Gray" laminate roof shingles, the stucco finish will be painted in a sand color, with trim details accented in dark brown and "Sand Flats" for the stone veneer. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Project is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act, Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, which exempts infill development when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; is on a site of no value to endangered, threatened, or rare species; is served by public utilities and services, and there are no Packet Pg. 14 B.3 impacts to traffic noise,air quality or water quality. A Notice of Exemption has been included for adoption. PUBLIC NOTICE: Public notice of the Project was provided, including publishing in the Grand Terrace City News and mailing notices to property owners within 300 feet of the Project site, 10 days prior to the meeting date. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted in three public places. To date, City staff has not received any comments regarding the proposed Project. CONCLUSION: The Proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations. The Variance can be granted base on the special circumstance of the lot shape. The granting of the Variance will not create negative impacts, and the construction of the residence will complement the surrounding area. Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution approving the Project. ATTACHMENTS: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 (DOC) Exhibits to Resolution (PDF) PC Resolution_10.30.2017 (DOC) Exhibits to Resolution (PDF) Notice of Exemption (DOC) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 11/07/2017 10:19 AM City Attorney Completed 11/07/2017 10:19 AM Sandra Molina Completed 11/07/2017 3:13 PM Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review Board Pending 11/16/2017 6:30 PM Packet Pg. 15 B.3.a RESOLUTION NO.17- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVE VARIANCE 17-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 16-03 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274) A SUBDIVISION OF A 0.42 ACRE INTO TWO LOTS LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167-161-32) WHEREAS, Jai Ganesh LLC represented by Edmundo Ilabaca of Futrono Engineering Inc., has filed applications for Tentative Parcel Map 16-03 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274) to subdivide 0.42 acres into two (2) single family lots, with each lot measuring 7,369 square feet and 10,677 square feet, respectively; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has filed Variance 17-01 requesting to deviate from the 100 foot lot depth requirement by 32 feet for Parcel 1; and WHEREAS, Site and Architectural Review 17-02 was filed to construct a 2,290 square foot single family home on Parcel 2 created by Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274; and WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential and designated Low Density Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map; located at 22034 De Berry Street and identified as AParcel Number 1167-161-32; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for an environmental exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, it is devoid of habitat for biological resources and the Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission/Site and Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Architectural Review Board of the City of Grand Terrace: Packet Pg. 16 B.3.a 1.The Planning Commissionrecommends that the City Councilfindthat the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Notice of Exemption prepared in connection with the Project has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board, and is recommended for adoption. 2. The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to Variance 17-01: a. A special circumstance regarding the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property exists. Due to the triangular shape of the site, the design of Parcel 1 also results in a triangular shape. The angle of the hypotenuse is such that the depth of the lot is gradually reduced. The triangular shape of the property precludes the ability to meet the lot depth requirement for Parcel 1. A special circumstance exists to support the Variance, because the triangular shape makes it infeasible for the lot depth to be met for Parcel 1 b. Because of the special circumstance, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The Parcel 1 to meet the minimum lot depth requirement; and strict application of the zoning code would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties. c. The granting of the Variance will not constitute the grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the property is situated. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege, but rather provide the applicant with the ability to subdivide the property into two lots, and ability to develop proposed Parcel 2. In addition, the granting of the Variance will not create negative impacts to the proposed and adjacent residences. d. The granting of the Variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the district governing the parcel of property. The proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Map, which is intended for single family residences, and the granting of the Variance will not authorize a use that is not permitted by the R1-7.2 Single Family Residential District. e. The granting of the Variance will not result in a situation inconsistent with the latest adopted of General Plan. The project is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation on the General Plan Land Use Map, Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) which allows land uses to single family detached residential units. Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 17 B.3.a f.Conditions necessary to secure the above findings are made a part of the approval of the variance. 3. The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to Tentative Parcel Map 16-03: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City General Plan and any applicable specific plan for the area. The proposed single family residential project at a density of 4.76 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan designation, which is intended for detached single family residential. It conforms to several General Plan policies relating to the construction of street improvements and utilities to serve the Project, and Housing Element policies to encourage affordable housing development. The Project is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, except for lot depth for Parcel 1, and for which a Variance has been applied for. b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City General Plan and any applicable specific plan for the area. The density of 4.76 dwelling units per acre conforms to the density limitation of 0-5 dwelling units per acre of the LDR designation. c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative parcel map. The site can support the proposed development, which is proposing a single-family residence on Parcel 2 d. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Project is infill development and the Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species and qualifies for an environmental exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. e. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The two-lot subdivision will not result in significant effect to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. f. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will not be provided. Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 18 B.3.a h.In approving the subdivision,the approving authority has considered its effects and the effects of adopted ordinances and actions relating to the review and approval of subdivisions on the housing needs of the region and balanced those needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Tentative Parcel Map 16-03 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274) and grant Variance 17-01 subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Tentative Parcel Map 16-03 (Tentative Parcel map No. 18274) is granted to subdivide 0.42 acres into two (2) single family lots. This approval is based on the application materials submitted by Jai Ganesh LLC., represented by Edmundo Ilabaca of on February 16, 2017, including a Soil Investigation Report, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, a Preliminary Hydrology Report, and revised project plans dated August 14, 2017. The application materials are approved as submitted and shall not be altered unless reviewed and approved by affected departments. th 2. If not appealed, this approval shall become effective on the eleventh (11) day thth day following such eleventh (11) day when the eleventh (11) day is not a city business day. This approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this resolution. This approval shall become null and void if a parcel map has not been timely filed prior to the expiration date in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning and Development Services Director upon submittal of a time extension request and appropriate filing fees. In granting any such time extension the City may impose new conditions and standards on the tentative parcel map, pursuant to Section 66452.6(e) of the California Government Code. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding (collectively referred to as "proceeding") brought against the City or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the City's decision to approve the tentative parcel map development, approval or authorization and approvals conditions or approval and certifications under CEQA and/or any mitigation monitoring program, but excluding any subdivision approval governed by California Government Code § 66474.9, and which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. This indemnification shall include, but not limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys' fees and Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) other costs liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by applicant, the City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 19 B.3.a such proceeding.The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, employees and attorneys for all costs incurred in additional investigation and/or study of, or for supplementing, preparing, redrafting, revising, or amending any document (such as a notice of exemption, negative declaration, EIR, specific plan or General Plan amendment), if made necessary by said proceeding and if applicant desires to pursue securing such approvals, after initiation of such proceeding, which are conditioned on the approval of such documents, and shall Indemnify the City for all the City's costs, fees, and damages that the City incurs in enforcing these indemnification provisions. 4. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the and content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services Department. 5. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically modified to comply with state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies, or must be approved in the final parcel map or improvement plan approvals 6. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and Title 17 (Subdivisions) contained in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 7. In the event that exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. 8. A parcel map prepared by, or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor, must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 9. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply Terrace Municipal Code. 10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Building and Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in the emorandum dated January 19, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) 11. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Public Works Director, including the conditions of approval contained in the November 6, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 20 B.3.a 12. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department; Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in Memorandum dated March 15, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 13. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the, City of Colton Water and Wastewater Department, relating to sewer service requirements. 14. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a will service letter, and obtain all requisite permits and clearances from Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWCO). 15. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the project boundaries, or obtain abandonment of said easement from the affected easement holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned. 16. All walls, exposed retaining walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. 17. Prior to parcel map approval, all on-site and off-site curbs, gutters, paving, street lights, sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation. 18. Prior to parcel map approval, plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the subdivider has entered into a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment and installation of the water improvements. 19. Prior to acceptance of the parcel map, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance 20. Improvement plans for utility connections and services, including water, fire hydrant and/or fire sprinklers, sewer, storm drain, gas, electric, phone, and television, shall be submitted to and approved by the City. 21. Prior to acceptance of the parcel map, sewer improvement plans must be approved by the City of Colton Wastewater & Utilities Department. Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) 22. The parcel map shall be filed with the County recorder and one (1) Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 21 B.3.a 23.The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, wall plans, and building elevations. 24. Prior to installation of fencing on shared property lines, the applicant shall submit an Encroachment Agreement signed by adjacent property owners authorizing construction of block walls on the shared property line. 25. The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at the time that construction permits are issued by the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, th California, at a public hearing held on the 16 of November 2017. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Debra Thomas Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Resolution_11.2.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 22 B.3.b Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Date:January 19, 2017 Applicant:Edmondo Ilabaca Address of Applicant: 1430 E. Cooley Drive, #220, Colton Ca 92324 Site Location: 22034 De Berry, Grand Terrace, CA, APN: 1167-161-32 W.O. # TPM, 16-03, SA 17-02 and Env. 16-14 P rovide four (4) construction plans and information for review of the proposed project. Below is a list of the plans and documents needed for plan review. The initial plan review usually will take three weeks on most projects. A plan review fee and permit fee will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to issue. Provide the following sets of plans and documents. Building and Safety submittal’s required at first plan review for proposed dwelling. (4)Architectural Plans (4)Structural Plans (2)Structural Calculations (4)Plot/Site Plans (4)Electrical Plans (4)Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4)Mechanical Plans (4)Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations (4)Precise Grading Plan Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) (4) Fire Sprinkler Plans (2) Soils Reports, Hydrology and Hydraulics Report (1)WQMP (1)Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan Building & Safety General Information Packet Pg. 23 B.3.b All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Mechanical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, and the 2016 California Electrical 2016 California Residential Code and the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code adopted by the State of California. The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection requests can be made twenty-four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non-sewer type shall conform to ANSI ZA.3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, all construction materials which are not used shall be recycled pursuant to Ordinance No. 243, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste. Prior to commencement of building construction, every applicant shall submit a properly completed “Waste Management Plan” (WWP) to the WMP Compliance Official in a form as prescribed by that Official. The completed WMP shall contain the following: A. The square footage of the proposed project; B. The estimated weight of project waste to be generated by materialsType; C. The maximum weight of such materials that can feasibly be diverted by reuse and recycling by materials type; D. The facility(s) that the materials will be hauled to and their expected diversion rates by material type. The City requires all materials to be diverted to Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (909) 429-4200. E. Estimated weight of construction and demolition waste that will be disposed. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety and the Planning Department. (A)Installation of a constructiontrailer. or, (B)Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Packet Pg. 24 B.3.b Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Building Permit Conditions 1.Prior to issuance of building permits, on site water and sewer service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency.No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the Fire Hydrants are established and approved.All on site grading, curb/gutter andstreet improvements shall be installed. 2Prior to issuance of building permits, building pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevationand set backs of the proposed structure. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. 3.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a certificate from the Colton Joint Unified School District stating that all school fees have been paid. 4.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909) 825-4128. 5.The proposed lot shall be connected to the public sewer service. 6.All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES). Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 25 B.3.b Public Works Conditions of Approval Date: November 6, 2017 A pplicant:Jay Danesh Address of Applicant: 1757 S. Euclid Ave,Ontario, CA 91762 Site Location: 22034De BerryStreet, Tentative Parcel Map No.16-03 Arch. Review 17-02, and Environmental 16-14, proposed Parcel Map No. 18274. Provide construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project as follows: (1)Grant Deed showing all easements. (1)Offsite/Street Water Utility Plans. (1) Offsite/Street Improvement Plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (1) Tentative Tract Map (1) Offsite/Sewer Plan Sheets (1) Preliminary Grading Plans and Erosion Control Plan (1) Soils, Hydrology, and Hydraulics Reports All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standards or standards approved by the Public Works Director. Special Conditions: 1.The existing street power pole owned by Edison shall be underground. 2.Street cut permits are required before work begins in the public right of way.A street cut Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) deposit will be collected for each street cut and held for two years. 3.The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing or damaged public improvements. The missing or damaged public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, and street lights. 4.The Applicant shall submit proposed sewer plans to the City of Colton for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the sewer review to the City Packet Pg. 26 B.3.b Public Works Conditions of Approval of Colton. Please provide a written “Will Serve” letter and approved sewer plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 5.The applicant shall submit proposed water plans to the Riverside Highland Water Company for plan review. Applicantshall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the water review to Riverside Highland Water Company.Please provide a written “Will Serve”letter and approved plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 6.Applicant shallsubmitproposed water plans withfire hydrants to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the fire hydrant system review to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department. 7.Provide 33-foot half right of way dedication on De BerryStreet along the entire frontage ofthe property and providecurb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping and repave to a half width street improvement. Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street pavement and traffic patterns and address flows for drainage. Minimum 2-inchasphalt grind and overlay is required. All grindings shall be recycled. 8.Minimum driveway grades shall be consistent with San Bernardino County Standard 131. Riverside County Standard 207driveway approach can also be used. 9.Monumentation: If any activity on this project disturbsanysurvey monuments, the disturbed monumnetation shall be located andreferenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb the monumnetation, and a corner record or record of surveyof the references shall be filled with the County. 10.All existing easements must be shown on improvement plans and parcelmap. 11.Provide a street light atevery 200 feet along the frontage of the property. 12.All frontage improvements should be within a dedicated r/w to the City as 33’-wide Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) public road easement. 13.The annexation to the City Streetlight and Landscape District must occur before the recordation of the ParcelMap. 14.The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Packet Pg. 27 B.3.b Public Works Conditions of Approval 15.Prior to any import to or export from the site, the applicant shall submit for and receive a haul permitfrom the Public Works Department. Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 28 B.3.b FIRE CONDITIONS DATE: 03-15-2017 FROM:Jeff Stinson, County Fire Phone: (909) 387-4140 Public Safety APPLICANT: Edmundo Ilabaca 22034 De Berry St.. Grand Terrace Ca. Mr. Edmundo Ilabaca submitted plans for a Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, at APN 1167- SUBJECT 161-32. Subdivision of 18,046 square ft. into 2 parcels. The proposed parcels will be 7,369 sqft. And 10,677 sqft. Respectively. There is an existing house located on the eastside of the lot; the applicant is proposing the future development of a single family house on the West side. He re-submitted materials and included the proposal for a single family residence of 2,284 square feet. PROJECT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS/ON-GOING CONDITIONS: Jurisdiction.The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein ("Fire Department"). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department. \[F01\] Fire Fee.The required fire feesare due at time of submittal; andpaid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division. This fee is in addition to fire fees that are paid to other City or County offices. \[F40\]$863.00 Tentative Tract Map Construction permits, including Fire Condition Letters, shall automatically expire and become invalid unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. Suspension or abandonment shall mean that no inspection by the Department has occured with 180 days of any previous inspection. After a construction permit or Fire Condition Letter, becomes invalid and before such previously approved work recommences, a new permit shall be first obtained and the fee to recommence work shall be one-half the fee for the new permit for such work, provided no changes have Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) been made or will be made in the original construction documents for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. A request to extend the Fire Condition Letter or Permit may be made in writing PRIOR TO the expiration date justifying the reason that the Fire Condition Letter should be extended. Additional Requirements. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other on site and off site improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. \[F01A\] Packet Pg. 29 B.3.b CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS Combustible Protection.Prior to combustibles, being placed on the project site an approved paved road with curb and gutter and fire hydrants with an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. The topcoat of asphalt does not have to be installed until final inspection and occupancy. \[F44\] The applicant or contractor shall contact their local water purveyor to obtain specifications on installing a residential fire sprinkler system within the jurisdiction of the water purveyor. The applicantattach a letter from the water purveyor indicating the types of systems allowed in that jurisdiction. Standard 101.1D \[F61\].SEPARATE SUBMITTAL Access. The development shall have a minimum of ___2_____ points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. Standard 902.2.1 Single Story Road Access Width: All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty six (26) foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions. Street Sign.This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street corner to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 \[F72\] Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 30 B.3.c RESOLUTION NO.17- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION/SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17-02 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,290 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON A 0.25 ACRE LOT CREATED BY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18274, LOCATED AT 22034 DE BERRY STREET (APN 1167- 161-32) WHEREAS, Jai Ganesh LLC represented by Edmundo Ilabaca of Futrono Engineering Inc., has filed a Site and Architectural Review 17-02, requesting approval to construct a 2,290-square foot single family residence on 0.25-acre lot, created by Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274 ; and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, was filed to subdivide Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274 into two separate lots; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has filed Variance 17-01 requesting to deviate from the 100 foot lot depth requirement by 32 feet for Parcel 1; and WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned R1-7.2 Single Family Residential and designated Low Density Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map; located at -161-32; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for an environmental exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, it is devoid of habitat for biological resources and the Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace: Packet Pg. 31 B.3.c 1.The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Boardhereby finds that the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Notice of Exemption prepared in connection with the Project has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board, and is hereby adopted. 3. The Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board finds as follows with respect to Site and Architectural Review 17-02: a. The proposed residential project is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan. The project is zoned R1- 7.2-Single Family Residential, this zoning designation is intended for very single family detached residential units. Per Zoning Code, the Project meets development standards relating to residential buildings, architecture, color, and scale. The project site is designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed development is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation because it allows single family detached residential uses. The Project is consistent with the Circulation Element as street improvements shall be required and reviewed as part of this development. The Project is also consistent with the Housing Element which encourages infill housing and private development of underutilized land for residential construction by maintaining the physical character of existing low residential neighborhood. b. The location and configuration of all structures associated with this Project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, that they do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy, that they do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas, and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The proposed residence is a single story contemporary home, the design and scale of the home will not interfere with the n or block scenic views. c. The architectural design of structures, their materials and colors are visually harmonious with surrounding development, natural landforms, are functional for the proposed project and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The Applicant is proposing a contemporary one- Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) story house, the design includes an ample number of windows to the front and back facades and stone veneer accents on the front, rear and west side of the residence. The applicant is proposing an earthy color pallet, which includes "Oakridge Estate Gray" laminate shingles, the stucco finish will be painted in a sand color, with trim details accented in dark brown Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 32 B.3.c and "Sand Flats" for the stone veneer.The design and style of the structure, and the drought tolerant landscape will enhance the property and be visually harmonious with surrounding development. d. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provides a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the natural landscape of the area and nearby developments. The Project site will be landscaped in accordance with City and State regulations. Planters are incorporated into the design which will be landscaped with water efficient plantings. e. There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus setting, and natural landforms are preserved. There will be no clearing of property or destruction of trees. f. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Site and Architectural Review 17-02 are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Site and Architectural Review 17-02 are approved to construct a 2,290-square foot home with a 480-square foot two car garage on Parcel 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 18274. This approval is based on the application materials submitted by Jai Ganesh LLC., represented by Edmundo Ilabaca of Futrono Engineering on February 16, 2017, including a Soil Investigation Report, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, a Preliminary Hydrology Report, and revised project plans dated August 14, 2017. The application materials are approved as submitted and shall not be altered unless reviewed and approved by affected departments. th 2. If not appealed, this approval shall become effective on the eleventh (11) day thth day following such eleventh (11) day when the eleventh (11) day is not a city business day. This approval shall expire twelve (24) months from the date of adoption of this resolution unless building permits have been issued and a substantial investment has occurred; all conditions of approval have been met; or a time extension has been granted by the City, in accordance with Chapter 18.63 Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) of the Zoning Code. Time extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. 3. Minor modifications to this approval which are determined by the Planning Director to be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, and which Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 33 B.3.c do not intensify or change the use or require any deviations from adopted standards, may be approved by the Planning Director upon submittal of an application and the required fee. 4. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand Terrace and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Grand Terrace concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the Planning Commission, or Planning and Development Services Director. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 5. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant must sign and and content shall be prepared by the Community and Economic Development Department. 6. In the event that exhibits, and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. 7. The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, floor plans, and building elevations, as they may be modified by these conditions of approval. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Tentative Parcel Map 18274 shall have been recorded. 9. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees, and demonstrate the payment of school impact fees to the Building and Safety Department. 10. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply Terrace Municipal Code. 11. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Building and Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in the Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) emorandum dated January 19, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 34 B.3.c 12.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Public Works Director, including the conditions of approval contained in the November 6, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 13. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department; Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in Memorandum dated March 15, 2017, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 14. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the, City of Colton Water and Wastewater Department, relating to sewer service requirements. 15. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a will service letter, and obtain all requisite permits and clearances from Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWCO). 16. Four (4) copies of the construction plans, including grading and site plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval, which shall include approval by the Planning and Engineering Divisions. 17. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the project boundaries, or obtain abandonment of said easement from the affected easement holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned. 18. Air conditioning units shall be ground mounted. 19. All ground mounted equipment, including utility boxes and backflow devices shall comply with all the utility and Fire Department requirements and be screened in a manner that does not impede traffic visibility. 20. The location of all building-mounted light fixtures shall be shown on the elevations. A detail of said fixtures shall be shown on the elevations, and fixtures shall be decorative and complementary to the building architecture. 21. All walls, exposed retaining walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit three (3) copies of landscape and irrigation plan Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Chapter 15.56) Landscaping Standards contained in Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code, State Model Ordinance to the Planning and Development Services Department for review and approval. The plans shall demonstrate the following: a. Incorporation of drip irrigation; Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 35 B.3.c b.Submit a $2,000.00deposit for landscape review. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, th California, at a public hearing held on the 16 of November 2017. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Debra Thomas Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: PC Resolution_10.30.2017 \[Revision 1\] (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 36 B.3.d Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Date:January 19, 2017 Applicant:Edmondo Ilabaca Address of Applicant: 1430 E. Cooley Drive, #220, Colton Ca 92324 Site Location: 22034 De Berry, Grand Terrace, CA, APN: 1167-161-32 W.O. # TPM, 16-03, SA 17-02 and Env. 16-14 P rovide four (4) construction plans and information for review of the proposed project. Below is a list of the plans and documents needed for plan review. The initial plan review usually will take three weeks on most projects. A plan review fee and permit fee will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to issue. Provide the following sets of plans and documents. Building and Safety submittal’s required at first plan review for proposed dwelling. (4)Architectural Plans (4)Structural Plans (2)Structural Calculations (4)Plot/Site Plans (4)Electrical Plans (4)Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4)Mechanical Plans (4)Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations (4)Precise Grading Plan Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) (4) Fire Sprinkler Plans (2) Soils Reports, Hydrology and Hydraulics Report (1)WQMP (1)Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan Building & Safety General Information Packet Pg. 37 B.3.d All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Mechanical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, and the 2016 California Electrical 2016 California Residential Code and the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code adopted by the State of California. The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection requests can be made twenty-four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non-sewer type shall conform to ANSI ZA.3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, all construction materials which are not used shall be recycled pursuant to Ordinance No. 243, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste. Prior to commencement of building construction, every applicant shall submit a properly completed “Waste Management Plan” (WWP) to the WMP Compliance Official in a form as prescribed by that Official. The completed WMP shall contain the following: A. The square footage of the proposed project; B. The estimated weight of project waste to be generated by materialsType; C. The maximum weight of such materials that can feasibly be diverted by reuse and recycling by materials type; D. The facility(s) that the materials will be hauled to and their expected diversion rates by material type. The City requires all materials to be diverted to Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (909) 429-4200. E. Estimated weight of construction and demolition waste that will be disposed. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety and the Planning Department. (A)Installation of a constructiontrailer. or, (B)Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Packet Pg. 38 B.3.d Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Building Permit Conditions 1.Prior to issuance of building permits, on site water and sewer service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency.No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the Fire Hydrants are established and approved.All on site grading, curb/gutter andstreet improvements shall be installed. 2Prior to issuance of building permits, building pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevationand set backs of the proposed structure. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. 3.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a certificate from the Colton Joint Unified School District stating that all school fees have been paid. 4.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909) 825-4128. 5.The proposed lot shall be connected to the public sewer service. 6.All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES). Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 39 B.3.d Public Works Conditions of Approval Date: November 6, 2017 A pplicant:Jay Danesh Address of Applicant: 1757 S. Euclid Ave,Ontario, CA 91762 Site Location: 22034De BerryStreet, Tentative Parcel Map No.16-03 Arch. Review 17-02, and Environmental 16-14, proposed Parcel Map No. 18274. Provide construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project as follows: (1)Grant Deed showing all easements. (1)Offsite/Street Water Utility Plans. (1) Offsite/Street Improvement Plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (1) Tentative Tract Map (1) Offsite/Sewer Plan Sheets (1) Preliminary Grading Plans and Erosion Control Plan (1) Soils, Hydrology, and Hydraulics Reports All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standards or standards approved by the Public Works Director. Special Conditions: 1.The existing street power pole owned by Edison shall be underground. 2.Street cut permits are required before work begins in the public right of way.A street cut Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) deposit will be collected for each street cut and held for two years. 3.The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing or damaged public improvements. The missing or damaged public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, and street lights. 4.The Applicant shall submit proposed sewer plans to the City of Colton for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the sewer review to the City Packet Pg. 40 B.3.d Public Works Conditions of Approval of Colton. Please provide a written “Will Serve” letter and approved sewer plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 5.The applicant shall submit proposed water plans to the Riverside Highland Water Company for plan review. Applicantshall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the water review to Riverside Highland Water Company.Please provide a written “Will Serve”letter and approved plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 6.Applicant shallsubmitproposed water plans withfire hydrants to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the fire hydrant system review to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department. 7.Provide 33-foot half right of way dedication on De BerryStreet along the entire frontage ofthe property and providecurb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping and repave to a half width street improvement. Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street pavement and traffic patterns and address flows for drainage. Minimum 2-inchasphalt grind and overlay is required. All grindings shall be recycled. 8.Minimum driveway grades shall be consistent with San Bernardino County Standard 131. Riverside County Standard 207driveway approach can also be used. 9.Monumentation: If any activity on this project disturbsanysurvey monuments, the disturbed monumnetation shall be located andreferenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb the monumnetation, and a corner record or record of surveyof the references shall be filled with the County. 10.All existing easements must be shown on improvement plans and parcelmap. 11.Provide a street light atevery 200 feet along the frontage of the property. 12.All frontage improvements should be within a dedicated r/w to the City as 33’-wide Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) public road easement. 13.The annexation to the City Streetlight and Landscape District must occur before the recordation of the ParcelMap. 14.The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Packet Pg. 41 B.3.d Public Works Conditions of Approval 15.Prior to any import to or export from the site, the applicant shall submit for and receive a haul permitfrom the Public Works Department. Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 42 B.3.d FIRE CONDITIONS DATE: 03-15-2017 FROM:Jeff Stinson, County Fire Phone: (909) 387-4140 Public Safety APPLICANT: Edmundo Ilabaca 22034 De Berry St.. Grand Terrace Ca. Mr. Edmundo Ilabaca submitted plans for a Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, at APN 1167- SUBJECT 161-32. Subdivision of 18,046 square ft. into 2 parcels. The proposed parcels will be 7,369 sqft. And 10,677 sqft. Respectively. There is an existing house located on the eastside of the lot; the applicant is proposing the future development of a single family house on the West side. He re-submitted materials and included the proposal for a single family residence of 2,284 square feet. PROJECT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS/ON-GOING CONDITIONS: Jurisdiction.The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein ("Fire Department"). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire Department. \[F01\] Fire Fee.The required fire feesare due at time of submittal; andpaid to the San Bernardino County Fire Department/Community Safety Division. This fee is in addition to fire fees that are paid to other City or County offices. \[F40\]$863.00 Tentative Tract Map Construction permits, including Fire Condition Letters, shall automatically expire and become invalid unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. Suspension or abandonment shall mean that no inspection by the Department has occured with 180 days of any previous inspection. After a construction permit or Fire Condition Letter, becomes invalid and before such previously approved work recommences, a new permit shall be first obtained and the fee to recommence work shall be one-half the fee for the new permit for such work, provided no changes have Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) been made or will be made in the original construction documents for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. A request to extend the Fire Condition Letter or Permit may be made in writing PRIOR TO the expiration date justifying the reason that the Fire Condition Letter should be extended. Additional Requirements. In addition to the Fire requirements stated herein, other on site and off site improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. \[F01A\] Packet Pg. 43 B.3.d CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS Combustible Protection.Prior to combustibles, being placed on the project site an approved paved road with curb and gutter and fire hydrants with an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. The topcoat of asphalt does not have to be installed until final inspection and occupancy. \[F44\] The applicant or contractor shall contact their local water purveyor to obtain specifications on installing a residential fire sprinkler system within the jurisdiction of the water purveyor. The applicantattach a letter from the water purveyor indicating the types of systems allowed in that jurisdiction. Standard 101.1D \[F61\].SEPARATE SUBMITTAL Access. The development shall have a minimum of ___2_____ points of vehicular access. These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. Standard 902.2.1 Single Story Road Access Width: All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty six (26) foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions. Street Sign.This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign shall be installed on the nearest street corner to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any combustible material being placed on the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first structure, the permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 \[F72\] Attachment: Exhibits to Resolution (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) Packet Pg. 44 B.3.e CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Planning and Development County of San Bernardino Services Department nd 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2 Floor City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Project Title: Site and Architectural Review 17-02, Tentative Parcel Map 16-03, Variance 17- 01, and Environmental 16-14 Project Location Specific: The project is located at 22034 De Berry Street, in the County of San Bernardino, APN: 1167-161-32 Description of Project: Construct (1) one single family residence within the boundaries of Tentative Parcel Map 18274, a 2 lot subdivision. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Grand Terrace Planning Commission Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: Jai Ganesh LLC Exempt Status: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, Infill Development Projects Reasons Why Project is Exempt: Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This section exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, it is devoid of habitat for biological resources, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. Lead Agency or Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone (909) 824-6621 Attachment: Notice of Exemption (2315 : TPM 16-03, V 17-01, SA 17-02 and E 16-14) ______________________________ _________________ Sandra Molina Date Planning and Development Services Director C:\\users\\jlambarena\\appdata\\local\\temp\\minutetraq\\grandterracecityca@grandterracecityca.iqm2.com\\work\\attachments\\4335.doc 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600 Packet Pg. 45 C.1 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE:November 16, 2017 TITLE:Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION:1)Open the public hearing continued from October 19, 2017 to the present date to discuss the Staff Report; and 2)Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADDENDUM AND ADOPT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 17-03 AND ZONE CHANGE 17-01 AMENDING THE ZONING CODE AND REVISING THE ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE AGRICULTURAL-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #3, Promote Economic Development by establishing a framework to allow limited commercial agricultural uses within ranchette homes and provides the flexibility for development based on the underlying zone district. BACKGROUND: On October 19, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on a proposed zoning code amendment and zone change uponan approximate 46-acre project area north of Vivienda Avenue. This proposal was brought forward by Council direction. The Council received a request from three property owners within and outside of the project area that the City consider initiating a zoning amendment for the 46-acre agriculture uses in this area. The Council authorized a professional services contract with John H. Douglas Associates and directed staff tomake necessary revisions to allow agricultural uses with ranchette homes. th The proposal brought before the Planning Commission on October 19would establish a new overlay district: Agricultural-2 Overlay District (AG-2) over the entire project area and which would amend the zoning code and zoning map. This approach would allow property owners to exercise the option to establish light commercial agricultural uses with ancillary ranchette homes on 1 acre lots; and would also retain the underlying M2 zone. (Refer to October 19, 2017 Staff Report.) Packet Pg. 46 C.1 During the meeting several members of the public, including property owners from within the project area and in the surrounding area spoke in opposition to the AG-2 Overlay proposal, with some stating that the entire project area should be re-zoned Agricultural. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to November 16, 2017, and directed staff to provide an analysis of: (1) rezoning the entire project area to A-1; and (2) zoning the south half to Light Agricultural keeping the AG 2 overlay on the north half of the Project Area. DISCUSSION: Zoning History As previously indicated, when the City incorporated the City Council adopted both the County Code and County General Plan. In other words, the zoning that was adopted by the City was what was in place by the County. For the north half (Area 9) it was Floodplain-T, and for the south half (Area 2) it was A-1-T. General Plan. The Council conducted first and second readings on Area 9, at noticed public hearings on September 13 and 27, 1984, and adopted Ordinance No. 81, rezoning the Area 9 to M2, Floodplain. The Council rezoned (Ordinance No. 83) Area 2 from A-1 to M-2, after conducting publicly noticed first and second readings on October 25, 1984 and November 8, 1984. The entire project area is in an Floodplain Overlay District. The FP overlay requires that all uses except flood related uses/structures, require the filing of a conditional use permit application. The FP overlay district would remain in place. Request to Council When the request was made to the Council to re-zone the entire project area to allow ranchettes uses, the Council was supportive of the concept. The Council heard public testimony from persons in support of the concept, and also heard from the property owner of 26 acres that started there were opposed to rezoning of their property, which the Council acknowledged. The Council directed Staff and the Consultant to make necessary revisions to allow agricultural uses with ranchette homes. Members of the Council also discussed that with the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) to nity opportunity to seek grant opportunities to fund further planning studies or plans for the For instance, the California Strategic Growth Council (SGC) coordinates the activities of Packet Pg. 47 C.1 State agencies and partners with stakeholders to promote sustainability, economic prosperity, and quality of life for all Californians. One program, the Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation, has grant opportunities to develop local and regional land use policies and strategies to protect agricultural land. The AG-2 proposal set forth, would be a first step in that area. Planning Commission Direction The Table below provides a simple synopsis of the process for the AG-2 proposal brought forth by Staff, and the two additional options that the Commission identified. Alternatives for Rezoning Topic AG-2 Overlay Agricultural Agricultural (current Rezoning (A-1) Rezoning (A-1 and proposal) AG-2 Overlay) General Plan No Yes - new GP land Yes - new GP land Amendment use category use category(s) Zoning Amendment Yes - AG-2 Yes - new zoning Yes - new zoning overlay and new district district(s) code section CEQA Addendum Addendum (revised) Addendum (revised) Native American No Yes - 90 days Yes - 90 days consultation Additional public No Yes Yes notice Additional None Up to $3,000 Up to $3,000 Processing Cost (budgeted as (budgeted as contingency) contingency) Option to Re-Zone Entire Project Area to A-1 The re-zoning of the Project area would trigger a general plan amendment and the creation of a new general plan land use category and a zone change and code amendment to establish a new A-1 zoning district. A new A-1 chapter in the Zoning Code would need to be created and the project re-noticed. The property owner of 26 acres on the north portion of the site is on record that he opposes the re-zoning of his property. The Chairman asked if there would be any th liability should the property be rezoned. The City Attorney indicated at the October 19 a City has authority to rezone property even if held by private property owners. A private Packet Pg. 48 C.1 property owner gains a vested right in a lawful use after acquiring appropriate permits for such use and spending a significant amount of money in pursuit of such use. If the use is not lawful there is no vested right. If the use is not being exercised there is no vested right. Even Conditional Use Permits typically expire upon abandonment of the use granted therein for a period of 6 months or more. So the City is not restricted in its ability to rezone how it sees fit. A property owner with a vested right can continue on as a legal-non conforming use under a changed zone and be perfectly lawful in doing so. However, that is not to say that litigation could not happen. If it were to occur, there would be a cost to the City to respond to such action. The AG-2 Overlay proposal would preserve the underlying M2 zoning, and still allow for agricultural related uses and ranchettes. Also, because of the requirement for a CUP, any proposal whether under the M2 regulations or AG-2 Overlay district regulations, would require a noticed public hearing before the Planning Commission. The CUP would require the Commission to make findings to approve the project, and allows the Commission to establish on-going operating conditions of approval to regulate the project. Option of an A-1 zone and AG-2 Overlay This option would re-zone the south portion to A-1 and place the AG-2 Overlay district on the north portion. The option would also require a general plan amendment to create a new general plan land use category and a zone change to an A-1 zoning district. In addition to the AG-2 Overlay District chapter, a new A-1 chapter in the Zoning Code would also need to be created, and the project re-noticed. The regulations and standards for the A-1 zone could be similar to the AG-2 Overlay District, and again, because of the Floodplain Overlay, all uses require a Conditional Use Permit. Zoning and General Plan Amendments Amendments to the Zoning Code/Map and General Plan require that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and forward a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council would then consider the proposal at a noticed public hearing. The proposed AG-2 Overlay District achieves the direction that Staff was provided to necessary revisions to allow agricultural uses with ranchette homes. The Option to split the zoning with A-1 on the south side and AG-2 Overlay on the north side, could also meet the direction provided the chapter is carefully crafted. Attached is a comparison table of Permitted Uses: Existing AG Overlay vs. Proposed AG-2 Overlay. RECOMMENDATION Packet Pg. 49 C.1 recommending the City Council establish the AG-2 Overlay District, as proposed on October 19, 2017. The AG-2 Overlay District achieves the goal of establishing the zoning framework to allow the establishment of commercial agricultural with ranchette housing. It is also the most efficient method, as it will not require a general plan amendment. Therefore, Staff recommends its adoption. ATTACHMENTS: 1 - PC Report_10.19.2017.pdf (PDF) 2 - Staff Reports_1984 ReZoning.pdf (PDF) 3- Existing vs Proposed Uses_10.10.2017 (DOCX) 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (DOCX) 5 - Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft (DOCX) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 11/09/2017 1:25 PM City Attorney Completed 11/09/2017 2:19 PM Sandra Molina Completed 11/09/2017 3:01 PM Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review Board Pending 11/16/2017 6:30 PM Packet Pg. 50 C.1.a A.2 the General Plan FEIR, therefore an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164 (Attachment 6). ATTACHMENTS: Zoning Map_ Sep_2017(PDF) Existing Chapter 18.53 Agricultural Overlay District.pdf(PDF) Exhibit of Existing vs Proposed Uses_10.10.2017(DOCX) 2017-10-19_PC Resov2(DOCX) Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft(DOCX) Letter to Commissioners for agenda packet-from Jeffrey McConnell(DOCX) APPROVALS: Sandra MolinaCompleted10/13/2017 12:54 PM City AttorneyCompleted10/13/2017 3:24 PM Sandra MolinaCompleted10/13/2017 3:28 PM Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review BoardPending10/19/2017 6:30 PM Attachment: 1 - PC Report_10.19.2017.pdf (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 51 C.1.b Attachment: 2 - Staff Reports_1984 ReZoning.pdf (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 52 C.1.b Attachment: 2 - Staff Reports_1984 ReZoning.pdf (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 53 C.1.b Attachment: 2 - Staff Reports_1984 ReZoning.pdf (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 54 C.1.b Attachment: 2 - Staff Reports_1984 ReZoning.pdf (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 55 C.1.c Permitted Uses: Existing AG Overlay vs. Proposed AG-2 Overlay District AG Overlay (existing) AG-2 Overlay (proposed) A-1 Zone Permitted One temporary stand for Temporary uses which are Uses display and sale of determined by the community seasonal items such as development director not to Christmas trees and have significant long-term pumpkins produced on impact on the environment the premises may be approved for a specific length of time by the planning director Temporary sheep grazing Animal keeping o Horse, mule, donkey or pony o Small animals o Birds or rodents Horticultural crops or tree farming Conditionally Animal keeping Animal keeping and boarding Permitted o Large animals Apiaries Uses other than a horse, Orchards, groves, nurseries, mule, donkey or field crops, tree crops, berry pony crops, bush crops, truck o Exotic or wild gardening and commercial animals flower growing, including the drying, packing, canning, freezing, or other acceptable methods of processing of fruits, nuts, vegetables and other horticultural products where such processing is primarily in conjunction with a farming operation Sale of fruit, vegetables, produce and flowers and other similar products grown on the property Riding stables and academies Sheep grazing only for the purpose of clearing unharvested crops or stubble Attachment: 3- Existing vs Proposed Uses_10.10.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Single-family residences, provided that such use is ancillary to a commercial agricultural use Accessory Structures and Uses. Private garages used by Packet Pg. 56 C.1.c persons residing on the premises, cabanas, laundry rooms, workshops, stables, barns, tack rooms, pens, corrals, and similar animal keeping/ agricultural structures, provided these structures shall not be used as a habitable dwelling or space Other uses which are determined by the Planning Commission to be similar in nature to a use listed in this section Prohibited Commercial composting Uses facilities Commercial recycling facilities Animal slaughtering Notes: See regulations for limitations on number of animals and other development standards Attachment: 3- Existing vs Proposed Uses_10.10.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 57 C.1.d RESOLUTION NO. 2017-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADDENDUM AND ADOPT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 17-03 AND ZONE CHANGE 17-01 AMENDING THE ZONING CODE AND REVISING THE ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE AGRICULTURAL-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Division 1 Title 7 of the California Government Code) on April 27, 2010, the City of Grand Terrace adopted Resolution 2010-10 adopting a General Plan to provide comprehensive, long-range planning guidelines for future growth and development which incorporates the following nine elements: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and Conservation, Public Health and Safety, Noise, Public Services, Housing, and Sustainable Development. Each element of the General Plan provides Goals, Programs, and Policies as required by State Law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65800 and 65850 of the California Government Code, the City may adopt ordinances to regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space, and other purposes; to regulate the location, height, bulk, number of stories and size of buildings and structures, the size and use of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces, the percentage of a lot which may be occupied by a building or structure, and the intensity of land use; and to establish requirements for off-street parking, in compliance with the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 proposes to amend the Zoning Ordinance to establish a new Agricultural-2 Overlay District as set forth in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Zone Change 17-01 proposes to amend the Zoning Map to remove the Agricultural Overlay and add the Agricultural-2 Overlay to the entire project area as shown in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, Council on April 27, 2010, for the General Plan Update, and pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared for Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01. The Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Addendum has determined that none of the conditions requiring a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration exists; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2017 and November 16, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date; and Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 58 C.1.d WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Addendum to the General Plan FEIR prepared for Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 satisfies the requirements of CEQA because: a. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. No substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and c. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified shows that: (i) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; (ii) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (iii) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (iv) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 3. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01: a. The proposed Zoning Code amendment and zone change will not be Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 59 C.1.d detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City because they promote land uses that are compatible with both the existing topography and land use patterns in the vicinity. Specific provisions of the proposed regulations, such as the maximum number of animals per parcel, minimum setbacks, required screening, and prohibited uses, are intended to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent properties that could result from agricultural uses. Further, the proposed amendment will not alter the existing Floodplain Overlay zoning regulations on the subject property, which serve to mitigate flood hazards. b. The proposed Zoning Code amendment and zone change will be consistent with the General Plan in that the property to be rezoned is designated Floodplain Industrial in the Land Use Element, which is intended for light industrial and light agricultural uses with rural residential use also allowed. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the FEIR Addendum and further recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 to effectuate the changes shown on Exhibits A and B, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, th California, at a regular meeting held on the 16 day of November, 2017. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Debra L. Thomas Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 60 C.1.d Exhibit A Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 CHAPTER 18.56 (AGRICULTURAL-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT) OF TITLE 18 IS ADDED AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 18.56 AGRICULTURAL-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT (AG-2) 18.56.010 - Purpose. The purpose of the Agricultural-2 Overlay (AG-2) district is to permit limited commercial agricultural uses with single-family residential as an accessory use to support the commercial agricultural uses. In order to ensure a quality living environment and to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, this chapter establishes certain regulations regarding the type, size, number and location of such agricultural uses permitted in the overlay district. The regulations contained in this chapter are in addition to the regulations of the underlying district. In the case of a conflict between the regulations of the overlay district and the underlying district, the regulations of the overlay district shall prevail. The contents of this chapter shall in no way be interpreted to relax any of the requirements of the San Bernardino County health code as adopted by the city. 18.56.020 - Permitted uses. Uses permitted in the AG-2 Overlay District are as follows: A. Temporary uses which are determined by the community development director not to have significant long-term impact on the environment. (Uses such as parking lot sales, Christmas tree sales, seasonal sales, rummage sales, and others with review through the land use approval or administrative site and architectural approval process in accordance with Chapter 18.63, Site and Architectural Review.) 18.56.030 - Conditionally permitted uses. Uses permitted in the AG-2 Overlay District with a conditional use permit are as follows: A. Animal keeping and boarding. All animals, excepting household pets, shall be kept at a minimum distance of seventy (70) feet from any structure or area used for human habitation or public assembly (e.g. parks, churches, etc.) on adjoining Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) property. The area of human habitation shall not include cabanas, patios, attached or detached private garages or storage buildings. The combined total number of animals kept on any one site shall not exceed the maximum number and combination of animals allowable as identified in Table 18.56.030. B. Apiaries, provided that no hives or boxes housing bees are kept closer than two hundred (200) feet from any dwelling other than that occupied by the property owner. Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 61 C.1.d C.Orchards, groves, nurseries, field crops, tree crops, berry crops, bush crops, truck gardening and commercial flower growing, including the drying, packing, canning, freezing, or other acceptable methods of processing of fruits, nuts, vegetables and other horticultural products where such processing is primarily in conjunction with a farming operation and the structures used for such processing are located at least twenty (20) feet from the property line. D. Sale of fruit, vegetables, produce and flowers and other similar products grown on the property; provided, however, that roadside stands used for such sales shall not exceed two hundred fifty (250) square feet. E. Riding stables and academies; provided that the minimum lot size for such uses shall be not less than five (5) acres, and that all buildings for the housing, feeding, or rental of such animals shall be at least one hundred (100) feet from any property line, and five hundred (500) feet from any residential zone, church, school, park or hospital. F. Sheep grazing only for the purpose of clearing unharvested crops or stubble, with no limit on the number of animals, for a period not exceeding thirty (30) days in any six-month period. Special application for such temporary grazing shall be made in writing, and approved by the Planning Director prior to commencement. G. Single-family residences, provided that such use is ancillary to a commercial agricultural use. H. Accessory Structures and Uses. Private garages used by persons residing on the premises, cabanas, laundry rooms, workshops, stables, barns, tack rooms, pens, corrals, and similar animal keeping/ agricultural structures, provided these structures shall not be used as a habitable dwelling or space, as defined by the adopted Uniform Building Code. Approval shall be through a minor conditional use permit review. I. Other uses which are determined by the Planning Commission to be similar in nature to a use listed in this section. 18.56.040 - Prohibited uses A. Commercial composting facilities B. Commercial recycling facilities C. Animal slaughtering TABLE 18.56.030 Maximum Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Minimum Site Number Area per Animal of Type of Animal or Use Animals (square feet) (per parcel) Poultry 25 per acre 100 Cattle or buffalo 6,000 - Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 62 C.1.d Horses, mules, donkey or pony 6,000 - 1 pond/acre Maximum pond size = ½ lot Fish raising area and - maximum 4 ponds per parcel Hogs 12,000 - Sheep, female goats and similar 4,000 livestock Adult male goats - 1 Rabbits and chinchillas 200 200 Ostriches, emus, alpacas, llamas 4,000 - Notes: 1. Young animals born to a permitted animal may be kept until such animals are weaned (cats and dogs: four months, large animals: six months, horses: twelve months). 18.56.050 Existing Legal Non Conforming Residential Uses. Existing legal nonconforming residential uses on Assessor Parcel Numbers 0275-191- 58 and 0275-191-43 may continue; pursuant to Chapter 18. 76 Non Conforming Uses and Structures. Animal keeping shall be pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.53 Agricultural Overlay District. 18.56.060 - Site development standards. Animal keeping areas shall be limited to portions of the lot with no more than a four percent (4%) grade. Other site development standards in the AG-2 Overlay District are as follows: Development Issue Standard Lot Area 1 acre Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) (minimum) Lot Width 150 (Minimum linear feet) Lot Depth 200 (Minimum linear feet) Setbacks (Minimum linear feet) Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 63 C.1.d front yard 40 rear yard 35 side yard (interior lot) 20 side yard (corner lot) 20 Height (primary structure) 35 (maximum linear feet) Building Lot Coverage (maximum percent, less the required parking, setbacks, and 40 landscaping) 18.56.070 Standards for Accessory Buildings A. Accessory buildings shall not occupy more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard. B. Accessory buildings shall be a minimum of fifteen feet (15 ft.) from the main buildings C. Accessory buildings shall be located no closer to the side and rear property lines than: 1. Ten (10) feet for one-story nonresidential accessory buildings 2. Fifteen (15) feet for two-story nonresidential accessory buildings and one- or two-story buildings used for residential purposes. 18.56.080 Screening and trash enclosures. A. Trash storage areas shall be enclosed by a wall not less than six feet in height. If unroofed, no such area shall be located within 40 feet of any district zoned for residential use. B. All outdoor animal uses and/or animal enclosures shall be screened in a manner determined by the planning commission in consideration of the type of animals being kept. 18.56.090 - Off-street parking. The number of off-street parking spaces shall be determined by the Planning Commission as part of the conditional use permit. The provisions of Chapter 18.60 shall apply in determining the size and location of required parking spaces. 18.56.100 - Signs. Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Signs in the A-1 district shall be limited to one unlighted sign per site not exceeding twelve (12) square feet pertaining to products offered for sale on the premises. Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 64 C.1.d Exhibit B Zoning Map Change 17-01 THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IS AMENDED TO RE-ZONE PROPERTIES AS FOLLOWS: Amend the zoning designation for the properties shown below from M2 Industrial/FP Floodplain Overlay/AG Agricultural Overlay to M2 Industrial/FP Floodplain Overlay/AG-2 Agricultural-2 Overlay: 0275-191-06 0275-191-30 0275-191-16 0275-191-43 0275-191-01 0275- 0275-191-16 191-16 0275-191-01 Attachment: 4 - PC Resolution_11.19.2017 (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) APN 0275-191-01 APN 0275-191-02 APN 0275-191-03 APN 0275-191-16 APN 0275-191-43 APN 0275-191-58 APN 0275-191-06 APN 0275-191-30 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 65 C.1.e Addendum to the City of Grand Terrace General Plan FEIR for the AG-2 Overlay Zoning Amendments Zoning Code Amendment 17-03 and Zone Change 17-01 October 19, 2017 Overview In 2010, the Grand Terrace City Council certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan The City now proposes to adopt zoning amendments to establish a new Agricultural-2 (AG-2) Overlay District and apply this overlay to approximately 46 acres designated Floodplain Industrial in the General Plan and designated M2-Industrial on the Zoning Map. The purpose of this Addendum is to demonstrate that the proposed zoning amendments would not result in any of the conditions under which a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration would be required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. Purpose of an Addendum CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines establish the type of environmental documentation that is required when changes to a project occur or new information arises after an EIR is certified or a Negative Declaration adopted for a project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes criteria for determining whether more detailed information, such as the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, is needed, and Section 15164 defines the appropriate use of Addendums to previous EIRs and Negative Declarations. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states: When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions in the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (3) New information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR. b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than Attachment: 5 - Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) shown in the previous EIR c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more effects on Packet Pg. 66 C.1.e FEIR Addendum for the AG-2 Overlay Zoning Amendments City of Grand Terrace October 19, 2017 Page 2 the environment but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) states: The Lead Agency or Responsible Agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a The following analysis demonstrates that the proposed AG-2 Overlay zoning amendments do not raise any new environmental issues and require only minor technical changes or additions to the previous FEIR to satisfy the requirements of CEQA. Project Description The City proposes to amend the Zoning Code to establish a new Agricultural-2 (AG-2) Overlay District and amend the Zoning Map to replace the current AG Overlay on four parcels and place a new AG-2 Overlay on the eight parcels within the entire project area encompassing a total of 46 acres located north of Vivienda Avenue and south of the Santa Ana River Trail (see Exhibit A). Allowable uses in the AG-2 Overlay would be in addition to those uses currently permitted in the M2 zone. Key provisions of the new AG-2 Overlay regulations are summarized as follows: Permitted uses: Temporary uses would be permitted subject to site and architectural review by the Planning and Development Services Director. Conditionally permitted uses: Agricultural uses would be permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The allowable number of animals would be limited as provided in Table 18.56.030 of the draft amendment. Single-family residences would also be conditionally permitted, provided that such use is ancillary to a commercial agricultural use. Other uses determined by the Planning Commission to be similar in nature to a listed use would also be conditionally permitted. Prohibited uses: Commercial composting, commercial recycling and animal slaughtering would be prohibited. Development standards: Standards such as lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage and building height would be established as provided in Section 18.56.050 of the draft amendment. Environmental Analysis and Conclusions In 2010, the City Council adopted an update to the General Plan and the area currently proposed for rezoning was designated Floodplain Industrial on General Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Element describes the purpose of the Floodplain Industrial designation as follows: Properties designated with the Floodplain Industrial designation experience the potential for severe flooding resulting from their proximity to the Santa Ana River. Attachment: 5 - Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Properties within this designation are planned for ultimate development as light industrial, nonpolluting uses similar to the Light Industrial designation. Proposed developments must demonstrate that adequate measures can be implemented to ensure that the proposed use is effectively protected from identified flood hazards. Presently, parcels within this area are largely undeveloped or developed as rural residential land uses. It is anticipated that buildout of this area will occur over a long period of time. During this buildout period, existing residential uses shall be permitted Packet Pg. 67 C.1.e FEIR Addendum for the AG-2 Overlay Zoning Amendments City of Grand Terrace October 19, 2017 Page 3 and regulated under the requirements of the Low Density Residential land use designation. Light agricultural uses shall be permitted including the keeping of animals with the approval of an Agricultural Overlay zoning designation. As compared to potential impacts analyzed in the General Plan FEIR, application of the new AG-2 Overlay to the parcels shown in Exhibit A would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts previously evaluated in the FEIR for the following reasons: The proposed zone change would not result in a larger area of ground disturbance than previously analyzed in the FEIR because the affected area is already designated for light industrial, and recognizes existing agricultural and residential uses. Therefore, potential impacts such as traffic, air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions and noise caused during construction activity would be substantially similar to those previously analyzed. The proposed zone change would not result in more intense development than previously analyzed in the FEIR because the intensity of uses allowed in the proposed AG-2 Overlay would not be substantially greater than the intensity of uses currently allowed (i.e., light industrial, agriculture and residential). Therefore, long-term impacts such as traffic, air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions would be substantially similar to those previously analyzed. Potential impacts related to agricultural activities (e.g., dust, noise, odors) would not be substantially more severe than previously analyzed in the FEIR because the affected area was designated for agricultural activities, including the keeping of animals, in the General Plan. For the reasons discussed above, the proposed zoning amendments would not result in the potential for significant environmental impacts that were not previously considered in the General Plan FEIR. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, a subsequent or supplemental EIR or IS/ND is not required. Attachment: 5 - Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 68 C.1.e FEIR Addendum for the AG-2 Overlay Zoning Amendments City of Grand Terrace October 19, 2017 Page 4 EXHIBIT A APN 0275-191-01 APN 0275-191-02 APN 0275-191-03 APN 0275-191-16 APN 0275-191-43 APN 0275-191-58 APN 0275-191-06 APN 0275-191-30 0275-191-06 0275-191-30 0275-191-16 0275-191-43 0275-191-01 0275- 0275-191-16 191-16 0275-191-01 Attachment: 5 - Addendum_AG-2 Overlay_2017-10-19_draft (2323 : Zoning Amendments North of Vivienda) Packet Pg. 69