Loading...
09-01-2016 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Attendee NamePresentAbsentLateArrived Chairman Tom Comstock¨¨¨ Vice-Chairman Vacant¨¨¨ Commissioner Jeffrey Allen¨¨¨ Commissioner Tara Ceseña¨¨¨ Commissioner Edward A. Giroux¨¨¨ APPROVAL OF AGENDA VOTE PUBLIC ADDRESS Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Planning & Development Services Department. This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because ofrestrictions contained in California Law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Chairman may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. City of Grand TerracePage 1 AgendaGrand Terrace Planning CommissionSeptember 1, 2016 A.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604), Variance 16-01 and Site and Architectural Review 16-01 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVE VARIANCE 16-01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16-01 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18604) A SUBDIVISION OF A TWO ACRE SITE INTO A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION TOTALING 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167-341-02, 78 AND 79) and 3) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING VARIANCE 16-01, SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 16- 01, AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVING LOT LAYOUT AND ARCHITECTURAL AND FLOOR PLANS FOR A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167-341-02, 78 AND 79) DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2. Zoning Code Amendment 16-01 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct a public hearing and 2) Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TABLE 18.10.030 (PERMITTED USES) OF SECTION 18.10.030 (USE REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) AS IT PERTAINS TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS AND CATS PER HOUSEHOLD DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES City of Grand Terrace Page 2 AgendaGrand Terrace Planning CommissionSeptember 1, 2016 B.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS C.INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS ADJOURN Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission to be held on September 15, 2016. Agenda item request must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk's office no later than 14 calendar days preceding the meeting. City of Grand Terrace Page 3 A.1 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE:September 1, 2016 TITLE:Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604), Variance 16-01 and Site and Architectural Review 16-01 PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION:1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVE VARIANCE 16-01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16- 01 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18604) A SUBDIVISION OF A TWO ACRE SITE INTO A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION TOTALING 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167-341-02, 78 AND 79) and 3) Adopt ARESOLUTIONOFTHEPLANNING COMMISSIONOFTHECITYOFGRANDTERRACE ADOPTINGANOTICEOFEXEMPTIONAND APPROVINGVARIANCE 16-01, SITEAND ARCHITECTURALREVIEW16-01,ANDAPLANNED RESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENTAPPROVING LOT LAYOUT AND ARCHITECTURAL AND FLOOR PLANS FOR A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167-341-02, 78 AND 79) VISION STATEMENT Development. PROPOSAL Mr. Darryl Moore, representing Aegis Builders, Inc. has submitted Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (TTM 18604), Site and Architectural Review 16-01, Variance 16-01 and Environmental 16-05 proposing to combine two parcels measuring approximately two acres and subdivide them into a small lot subdivision totaling seventeen lots, served by a private street. The Applicant is proposing to utilize the Planned Residential Packet Pg. 4 A.1 Development standards contained in the Zoning Code for development of the subdivision. The homes proposed on the lots vary in size between 1,950 square feet to 2,140 square feet. Variance 16-01 is to deviate from the required setbacks on Lots 11 and 12 and the minimum lot size on Lot 11. The Project site is made up of two parcels located on the north side of Van Buren Street, adjacent to the Gage Canal. The site is an irregularly shaped parcel zoned R3- High Density Residential and is located at 22394 and 22404 Van Buren Street (APNs 1167-341-02, 78 and 79). A Letter of Intent is attached. authority on tentative tract maps. However, the Planning Commission has reviewing authority and makes a recommendation to the City Council on the tentative tract map. The Planning Commission has approval authority on Site and Architectural Review applications. BACKGROUND: Over the last year the City staff and the applicant have reviewed various iterations of the subdivision. The odd shape of the parcel has made designing the subdivision challenging. The shape of the parcel results in a unique hardship in developing the property. On April 14, 2016, the Applicant submitted the subject application. The application was reviewed by the Development Advisory Board and deemed incomplete on May 12, 2016 and August 4, 2016. On August 10, 2016, the Applicant submitted revised plans and materials, and the application was deemed complete and scheduled for public hearing. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The Project Site is an irregular polygon shaped lot and relatively flat that gradually slopes from east to west. It fronts along Van Buren Street, a 66-foot wide collector street, at its south boundary. Along Van Buren Street the parcel measures 262 feet wide and narrows to about 136 feet wide at its north boundary. The site contains two existing residences which are proposed to be demolished. The Gage Canal is located along the west boundary. Surrounding uses are as follows: Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North R3 Medium Density Residential Multi-family residential East R3 Medium Density Residential Single family residential South R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Single family residential West R1-7.2 Low Density Residential Gage Canal and single Packet Pg. 5 A.1 family residential further west ANALYSIS: General Plan/Zoning Consistency The Project site is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the General Plan Land Use Map. The MDR designation includes both single family detached and multiple family attached development, which may include small lot single family developments or attached multi-family developments including townhomes, condominiums, and apartments at densities of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The site is zoned R3 Medium Family Residential. This district is intended for medium density multiple family development, at a density of 12 dwelling units per gross acre. which is intended for single and . In 2012, Ordinance No. 260 was adopted which established Section 18.10.090 Planned Residential Development standards intended, in part, to allow for flexibility and creativity in the development of infill lots otherwise constrained due to lot size, configuration and/or surroundings. The use of the PDR standards is permissible in the R3 zone district, as determined by the Planning Commission, and provided the site is at least 22,000 square feet in size. This site qualifies for use of the PDR standards and Staff recommends its applicability to the Project. The PDR standards allow small lot subdivisions with lots measuring a minimum of 3,500 square feet. The building setbacks for small lot subdivisions are 15 feet at the rear, 5 feet and 8 feet side yards, and an average of 18 feet at the front, but no less than 16 feet. The Applicant has filed Variance 16-01 to deviate from the required setbacks on Lots 11 and 12 and the minimum lot size on Lot 11. The Applicant is requesting approval of five foot side yard setbacks for Lots 11 and 12, instead of 8 feet and 5 feet, a lot size of 3,468 square feet for Lot 11 instead of 3,500 square feet. Staff believes that due to the odd shape of the Project Site, a strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity. These deviations are do not impact the viability of the proposed lots and staff recommends approval of the Variance. Tentative Tract Map/Conceptual Grading The tentative tract map also serves as the conceptual grading plan. The tentative tract map shows grading, easements, public improvements, and the location of existing utilities (water, sewer, street lights, etc.). Pad elevations are indicated on each lot. Packet Pg. 6 A.1 Generally, lots will be decreasing in elevation from south to north. Lots will drain to the private street and flow to an onsite basin. As shown on the tentative tract map there are two private easements on the property. Along the north and west property lines is a 10 foot wide easement for drainage and sewer purposes that serves the development to the north. There is a 24 inch storm drain pipe and an 8 inch sewer pipe that run within the easement. Along the west boundary the storm drain pipe runs very near to the property line. The City requires block walls to be constructed along the boundaries of tract map. In order to construct the wall along the west boundary, the storm drain pipe is proposed to be reconstructed to accommodate the block wall. The Applicant will be required to obtain authorization from the easement holder prior to work on the storm drain pipe. The Applicant also proposes to drain storm waters into the drain pipe within the easement and this would also require authorization from the easement holder. Code requires undergrounding of all public utilities in conjunction with development. The Applicant will underground the easterly power pole, but is requesting to keep the westerly power pole in place. The Site and Architectural Review Board has the authority to allow this power pole to remain in place. Circulation/Access Along Van Buren Street, the applicant will be required to install standard improvements along the project frontage, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lighting, and repave Van Buren Street to the centerline. Tesoro Court is proposed to be 36 feet wide which is permissible for private streets. Parking will only be allowed on one side of the street. Because the Project Site is narrow on the north end, a standard cul de sac bulb cannot be accommodated to allow an emergency turn. Instead a hammerhead is proposed, and this is acceptable to County Fire. Additionally, give the small size of the Project, County Fire is not requesting a second access point. Along Van Buren Street, Staff has included a condition of approval that would restrict direct access onto Van Buren Street for Lots 1 and 17. Site Plan The site plan shows the plotting of the homes in relation to the subdivision design. The homes are proposed to be two story homes and a mix of four different housing plans. The site plan delineates the setbacks for each lot and demonstrates that each home, Packet Pg. 7 A.1 with the exception of Lots 11 and 12 meet the structural setbacks. Lots 11 and 12 are proposed with two 5-foot wide side yard setbacks instead of 5 and 8 feet. The reduced setback is necessary because of the narrowness of the Project site and to accommodate the required hammerhead. Further, each home meets the required height, lot coverage, and parking requirements. The site plan depicts side yard easements which would extend the side yard of adjacent lots and allow greater usability. This is a concept that the Applicant indicates has been successful. While adjacent property owners would enjoy and maintain the easement area, structures would not be allowed to be constructed within the easement because restrict structures within the easement areas. Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans The four housing plans show that each house will have a covered entry porch, and an attached two car garage. Architectural styles include options for Spanish, Country and Santa Barbara styles. The Table below breaks down the floor plans. Proposed Floor Plans Plan Lots Square Stories BR/Baths Garage feet 1, 1R 3, 5, 7, 13 1,950 Two 4 Bedrooms/3 Baths 2-car 2, 2R 1, 8, 15-17 2,140 Two 4 Bedrooms/3 Baths 2car 3, 3R 2, 4, 6, 9,14 2, 051 Two 4 Bedrooms/3 Baths 2-car 4, 4R 10-12 2,005 Two 3 Bedrooms/2.5 2-car Baths Architecturally, there are six color and material schemes corresponding with each Plan. The colors and materials are complementary to the surrounding area. Each Plan will include a tiled roof and will have either an architectural stone or contrasting stucco color treatment. Accent colors will be used on entry and garage doors, eves, sliding doors, shutters and windows/door border treatments. The proposed color and materials board are attached to the report. Conceptual Landscape Plan: The applicant will be installing front yard landscaping on each lot, and on the street side yard of Lots 1 and 17 to create an enhanced landscape area. The conceptual landscape plan demonstrates adequate front yard landscaping. In an effort to conserve Packet Pg. 8 A.1 water use, the applicant is proposing drought tolerant shrubs. A final landscape and Ordinance is required. Agency Review The Project Plans were distributed to various agencies for their comments. Conditions Works Department; and from County Fire and Colton Water and Wastewater Department have been obtained. The Conditions are included in the attached Resolution. Riverside Highland Water Company indicated that they can serve the Project and final water improvement plans will require their review and approval. A condition of approval to this effect has been incorporated into the resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Project to construct a single-story residence and garage is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act, Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, which exempts infill development when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; is on a site of no value to endangered, threatened, or rare species; is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. A Notice of Exemption has been included for adoption. PUBLIC NOTICE: Public notice of the Project was provided, including publishing in the Grand Terrace City News and mailing notices to property owners within 300 feet of the Project site, 10 days prior to the meeting date. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted in three public places. To date, City staff has not received any comments regarding the proposed Project. CONCLUSION: The irregularly shaped infill Site presents many challenges to site design and creates a unique hardship for property owner with the result that strict application of the zoning code would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity. However, given these constraints, the applicant has been able to design a subdivision with usable and functional lots that can support residential development. The Project will create 17 additional residential units that will assist the City accommodate its growth demands contained in the Housing Element. Packet Pg. 9 A.1 ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Intent (PDF) PC Resolution_TTM 18604 (DOC) Exhibits, Conditions of Approval (PDF) PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (DOCX) Exhibits, Conditions of Approval (PDF) Notice of Exemption_SA 16-01 (DOC) Color and Material Boards (PDF) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 08/24/2016 4:30 PM City Attorney Completed 08/25/2016 8:36 AM Sandra Molina Completed 08/25/2016 10:37 AM Planning Commission Pending 09/15/2016 6:30 PM Packet Pg. 10 A.1.a Attachment: Letter of Intent (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 11 A.1.a Attachment: Letter of Intent (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 12 A.1.b RESOLUTION NO. 2016- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVE VARIANCE 16-01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16-01 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18604) A SUBDIVISON OF A TWO ACRE SITE INTO A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION TOTALING 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167- 341-02, 78 AND 79) WHEREAS, Aegis Builders, Inc., represented by Darryl Moore has filed applications for Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604) to subdivide two acres into a small lot subdivision totaling 17 lots. A concurrent Variance application (Variance 16-01) was submitted to deviate from the lot standards for Lots 11 and 12; along with Site and Architectural Review 16-01 for approval of the site layout, architectural plans and pursuant to Planned Residential Development standards. WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned R3-Medium Density Residential and designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map, located 22394 and 22404 Van Buren Street, identified as 1167-341- 02, -78, and -79). The Project site contains two single family residences. WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for an environmental exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the property has no value as habitat for any rare, endangered, or threatened species, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. WHEREAS, on September 1, 2016, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing at the Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Section 15332. The Notice of Exemption prepared in connection with the Project has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 13 A.1.b Planning Commission, and is recommended for adoption. 2. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Variance 16-01 relating to lot area for Lot 11: a. A special circumstance regarding the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property exists. The irregular polygon shaped parcel is narrower to the north and due to this narrowness and design of emergency turn around results in a lot area of 3,468 square feet, 35 square feet less than the minimum requirements for Lot 11. Because of the irregular shape the location of the private street and turn around is in its most logical location. b. Because of the special circumstance, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The irregular Lot 11. Strict application of the zoning code would result in a lesser number of lots with lot sizes greater than the intent of the PDR standards. c. The granting of the variance will not constitute the grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the property is situated. The granting of the variance would not grant a special privilege; rather it will provide the ability to develop the subject lot at comparable densities as adjacent properties and as anticipated in the General Plan. d. The granting of the variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the district governing the parcel of property. The granting of the variance would not authorize an unpermitted use because small lot subdivisions are permitted in the R3 zone district. e. The granting of the variance will not result in a situation inconsistent with the latest adopted general plan. The density of 8.5 is consistent with the MDR General Plan designation which planned for a maximum density of 12 units per acre. f. Conditions necessary to secure the above findings are made a part of the approval of the variance. 3. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Tentative Tract Map 16- 01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604): a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City General Plan and any applicable specific plan for the area. The proposed small lot subdivision Project at a density of 8.5 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation, which is intended for single and multiple family development. It conforms to several General Plan policies relating to the construction of roadways and utilities to Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 14 A.1.b serve the Project, and Housing Element policies to encourage housing development of various types and designs. The Project is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, except for Lots 11 which does not meet the minimum lot area standard. However, consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, the Applicant has filed a Variance application. b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City General Plan and any applicable specific plan for the area. The density of 8.5 dwelling units per acre conforms to the density limitation of 6- 12 dwelling units per acre of the MDR designation. The Project conforms to several General Plan policies relating to the construction of roadways and utilities to serve the Project, and Housing Element policies to encourage housing development of various types and designs. c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The site can support the Project at the proposed density of 8.5 dwelling units per acre. The Variance is necessitated by the irregular lot shape. d. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Project is infill development and qualifies for an environmental exemption, pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.. e. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. f. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will not be provided. h. In approving the subdivision the approving authority has considered its effects and the effects of adopted ordinances and actions relating to the review and approval of subdivisions on the housing needs of the region and balanced those needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 4. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Section 18.10.090 Planned Residential Development: Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) a. The development includes only uses allowed within the base zoning district. The R3-Medium Density Residential designation allows infill residential development subject to R3 standards, and the Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 15 A.1.b Project conforms to those standards. b. The development is compatible with other development within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed project. The Project is compatible with the zoning district and general neighborhood which is a mixture of single and multiple family residential housing. The small lot subdivision provides a transition from between traditional detached single family uses and attached multiple family uses to the north. c. The project would produce a development of higher quality and greater excellence of design than that might otherwise result from using the standard development regulations. The Project is a higher quality residential project, with moderate sized homes and enhanced building architecture. d. The subject site is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development. The site is small infill lot, constrained by lot configurations; however, the site is able to accommodate the project density. e. The project includes improved quality of life provisions and enhanced amenities, including an additional and appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, common open space, landscaping, parking areas, private open space, and sustainable improvement standards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a Notice of Exemption prepared for the Project and approve Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604) and Variance 16-01, subject to the following conditions of approval. General Conditions of Approval: 1. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604) and Variance 16-01 is granted to subdivide a two acre site into a small lot subdivision consisting of 17 lots on property located at 22394 and 22404 Van Buren Street, 1167-341-02, -78, and -79). Variance 16- 01 grants a less area of 3,468 square feet for Lot 11. This approval is granted based on the application materials submitted by Aegis Builders, Inc. represented by Darryl Moore on April 14, 2016, as modified on July 21, 2016, and August 10, 2016, including the revised tentative tract map, site plan, architectural elevations/floor plans and conceptual landscape plan. These plans are approved as submitted and conditioned herein, and shall not be further altered except as modified by these conditions of approval, and unless reviewed and approved by Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) the affected departments. Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 16 A.1.b 2. This approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this resolution. This approval shall become null and void if a final map has not been timely filed prior to the expiration date in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning and Development Services Director upon submittal of a time extension request and appropriate filing fees. In granting any such time extension the City may impose new conditions and standards on the tentative map, pursuant to Section 66452.6(e) of the California Government Code. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding (collectively referred to as "proceeding") brought against the City or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the City's decision to approve the tentative tract development, approval or authorization and approvals conditions or approval and certifications under CEQA and/or any mitigation monitoring program, but excluding any subdivision approval governed by California Government Code § 66474.9, and which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. This indemnification shall include, but not limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys' fees and other costs liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by applicant, the City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding.. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, employees and attorneys for all costs incurred in additional investigation and/or study of, or for supplementing, preparing, redrafting, revising, or amending any document (such as a notice of exemption, negative declaration, EIR, specific plan or General Plan amendment), if made necessary by said proceeding and if applicant desires to pursue securing such approvals, after initiation of such proceeding, which are conditioned on the approval of such documents, and shall Indemnify the City for all the City's costs, fees, and damages that the City incurs in enforcing these indemnification provisions. 4. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically modified to comply with state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies, or must be approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and Title 17 (Subdivisions) contained in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) 6. In the event that exhibits and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 17 A.1.b 7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Building and Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in the Memorandum dated August 3, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Works Department, including the conditions of approval contained in the Memorandum dated August 23, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Colton Public Works Department Water & Wastewater Department, including the conditions of approval contained in their letter dated May 4, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in their letter dated July 27, 2016, attached hereto attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 11. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services Department. Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval: 12. A final soils report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Any recommendations included in the soil study shall be incorporated into the design of the precise grading and paving plan as appropriate. 13. The applicant shall prepare improvement plans, in accordance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. 14. The final tract map shall be revised to show access rights restricted on Lot 1 and 17 abutting Van Buren Street. 15. Lots 1 and 17 shall take access along Tesoro Street. 16. The side yard easements shall state that structures are not permitted within the easement area. 17. If any public improvement required as part of the approval of the subdivision will not be completed and accepted prior to approval of the final tract map, then prior to a determination of a complete and timely filing of the final tract map, the subdivider, at his expense, shall be required to enter into a subdivision improvement agreement, with the City to complete said public improvements in vision Ordinance. Performance of said agreement shall be guaranteed by the security specified in the Subdivision Ordinance (GTMC Title 17) and Section 66499 et seq. of the Subdivision Map Act. Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) 18. Company. Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 18 A.1.b 19. A final tract prepared by, or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor, must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 20. The applicant shall submit a title report and subdivision guarantee showing all fee interest holders, all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee, all trust deeds, together with the names of the trustee and all easement holders. The account for this title report shall remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County Recorder. No easements shall be granted and recorded until after the final map is recorded, unless approved by the City Engineer and subordinated to any City easements by a certification upon the title sheet of the final map, prior to the grant. 21. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the project boundaries. In the case where easements are proposed to be abandoned, the applicant shall obtain abandonment of said easements from the affected easement holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned accordingly and as approved by the City. 22. Easements for all on-site facilities, public and private, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation. Such easements may include, but are not limited to, sewer, water, electric, gas, telephone, storm drains, detention basins, and landscaping 23. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map. 24. Prior to final map approval, all on-site and off-site curbs, gutters, paving, street lights, sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation. 25. Prior to final map approval, plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the subdivider has entered into a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment and installation of the water improvements. 26. Prior to the final map approval, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire 27. Improvement plans for utility connections and services, including water, fire hydrant and/or fire sprinklers, sewer, storm drain, gas, electric, phone, and television, shall be submitted to and approved by the City. 28. Sewer improvement plans must be approved by the City of Colton Wastewater & Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Utilities Department. Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 19 A.1.b 29. Access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over private drives within the development for all City vehicles, including police, fire, and other emergency vehicles. The document(s) recording this access shall be prepared by the applicant for review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to recordation. 30. The applicant shall construct public improvements along the City of Riverside (Gage Canal) street frontage. Public improvements shall consist of half street width paving overlay after utility installations on the entire length of the project (minimum 2 inch asphalt overlay with an asphalt grind), curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and striping Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street flows for drainage and traffic. 31. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and one (1) Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. 32. The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, wall plans, and building elevations. 33. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply s Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.108 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 34. All perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. 35. Perimeter walls shall be constructed prior to acceptance of the final map, and adjacent owner authorization shall be obtained prior to construction on shared property lines. 36. The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at the time that construction permits are issued by the City. 37. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activities are allowed on Sundays and federal holidays except for emergencies, and/or subject to approval by the Building Official, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 38. All construction equipment shall be equipped with suitable muffler systems. 39. All construction activity related to this project shall comply with the Citys Noise Ordinance as stipulated in Chapter 8.108 of the Municipal Code. Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) 40. The applicant shall submit a declaration of covenants, conditions and Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 20 A.1.b restrictions (CC&R's) establishing a Home Owner's Association subject to review and approval by the Community and Development Director and the City Attorney approval. Such declaration shall set forth provisions for maintenance of all common areas, payment of taxes and all other privileges and responsibilities of the common ownership. The CC&R's shall include provisions prohibiting the homeowners' association (HOA) from quitclaiming, selling or otherwise transferring the land held in common ownership to private property owners. The shall include the following provisions: a. The City shall be made a party of the CC&R's. The City's participation shall be specifically limited to enforcement of the HOA's maintenance obligation. b. The provisions of approved CC&R's shall not be amended without the prior approval of the Planning and Development Services Director and City Attorney who at his or her discretion may refer the matter to the Planning Commission. Requests for amendments to existing CC&R's shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department. c. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall disclose the location of the existing ten (10) foot sewer and drainage easements, and shall state that no permanent structural encroachments shall be installed within the easements. d. Privacy fencing, concrete stoops or pavers, and plant material, excluding trees, shall be permitted within the easements. However, the property owner shall obtain an encroachment permit, and enter into a hold harmless agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, in the event that these improvements must be removed to access the easement. Replacement of these materials shall be at the expense of the property owner and/or association. 41. The appli Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 21 A.1.b PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, st California, at a regular meeting held on the 1 day of September, 2016. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Pat Jacquez-Nares Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: PC Resolution_TTM 18604 \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 22 A.1.c Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Date: August 3, 2013 Applicant:Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Darryl Moore Address of Applicant: 2331 W. Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Site Location: 22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street, Tentative Tract No.16-01 Arch. Review 16-01, Variance 16-01 and Environmental 16-02, proposed Tract Map No. 18604. W.O. # 12-2.1143 Provide four (4) construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project. Below is a list of the plans and documents Building and Safetywill need for plan review. The initial plan review will take approximately three weeks on most projects. You have received a work order number:12-2.1143 for the proposed project, this number will be needed to obtain information regarding your plan review. Plan review fees and permit fees will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to issue. Provide the following sets of plans and documents. Building and Safety submittal’s required at first plan review. (4)Architectural Plans (4)Structural Plans (2)Structural Calculations (4)Plot/Site Plans (4)Electrical Plans (4)Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4)Mechanical Plans (4)Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations (2) Soils and Hydrology Reports Building & Safety General Information All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2013California Building Code, 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, and the 2013 California Electrical Packet Pg. 23 A.1.c Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Code, 2013Residential Code and the 2013California Green Buildings Standardsadopted by the State of California. If the building plans are submitted before January 1, 2017 the plans will be reviewed under the 2013 California Building Codes, however if the plans are submitted after January 1, 2017 the plans will be reviewed under the 2016California Building Codes. All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standardsor standards approved by the Public Works Director or City Engineer. The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection requests can be made twenty four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fenceand screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at alltimes to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer type shall conform to ANSI ZA.3. Prior to building permits, applicant shall enter into a recycling agreement for construction waste according to Ordinance No. 243.A deposit will be required as part of this ordinance. Recycling receipts from the recycled company responsible for accepting the materials shall be kept in the construction office for viewing by the City Inspector.Burrtec Waste Industries has a Franchise Agreement with the City to recycle waste. Waste from the project will need to be disposed at a Burrtec Waste Industries facility. No waste shall be disposed of at any other waste facility. If waste is disposed of at an unapproved facility, funds from the deposit willbe used to offset the waste stream. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items isin place and approved by Building & Safety and the Planning Department. (A)Installation of a construction trailer. or, (B)Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Packet Pg. 24 A.1.c Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Building Permit Conditions 1.Prior to issuanceof building permits, on site water service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency. On site fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the fire hydrants are established and approved. 2.Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevation and set backs of the structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the precise grading plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. 3.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from the City of Colton Waste Water Department. 4.All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES)and the current San Bernardino County MS4stormwaterpermit. Packet Pg. 25 A.1.c Exhibit 2 Public Works Conditions of Approval Date: August 23, 2016 Applicant: Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Darryl Moore Address of Applicant: 2331 W. Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Site Location: 22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street, Tentative Tract No.16-01 Arch. Review 16-01, Variance 16-01 and Environmental 16-02, proposed Tract Map No. 18604. Provide construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project as follows: (1) Grant Deed showing all easements. (1) Street Water Utility Plans. (1) Street Improvement Plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (1) Tentative Tract Map Plans (1) Sewer Plan Sheets (1) Rough and Precise Grading Plans (1) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) and Erosion Control Plan (1) Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (1) Soils, Hydrology, and Hydraulics Reports All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standards or standards approved by the Public Works Director. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Special Conditions: 1. The existing street power pole owned by Edison shall be underground. 2. Street cut permits are required before work begins in the public right of way. A street cut deposit will be collected for each street cut and held for two years. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 26 A.1.c 3. The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing or damaged public improvements. The missing or damaged public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, and street lights. 4. Provide half street width paving overlay after utility installations on the entire length of the project. Minimum 2 inch asphalt overlay with an asphalt grind. All Grindings shall be recycled. 5. The Applicant shall submit proposed sewer plans to the City of Colton for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the sewer review to the City of Colton. City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 6. The applicant shall submit proposed water plans to the Riverside Highland Water Company for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the water review to Riverside Highland Water Company. Please provide Serve letter and approved plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 7. Applicant shall submit proposed water plans for fire hydrants to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the fire hydrant system review to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department. 8. Submit the proposed tract map to the City of Riverside Gage Canal Department for conditions and approvals. This project may require new curb and gutter as well as an approach next to the existing gates of the Gage Canal. Obtain a construction encroachment permit from Riverside Gage Canal. 9. Provide 11-foot right of way dedication on Van Buren Street along the entire frontage of the property and provide paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping and repave to a half width street improvement. Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street flows for drainage and traffic. 10. The street curb returns and ramps at the intersection on Tesoro Court and Van Buren Street shall be constructed per San Bernardino County Standard 110. The radius of these curbs shall be a minimum of 30 feet. 11. Minimum driveway grades shall be consistent with San Bernardino County Standard 131. Riverside County Standard driveway approach can also be used. 12. Monumentation: If any activity on this project disturbs any survey monuments, the disturbed monumnetation shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 27 A.1.c prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb the monumnetation, and a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filled with the County. 13. Provide a letter from adjacent property owners giving their consent to allowing the relocation of their stormdrain and any other utility line that may need relocation. Also said letter should give their consent to allowing the proposed connection to their utility line. If no such consent is given, developer must provide separate utility lines to serve the new development. agreement for any shared utilities. 14. A blockwall is required around the perimeter of the property. 15. All existing easements must be shown on improvement plans and tract map. 16. Tesoro Street must be dedicated to the City as Public Access Easement and Utilities Easement. 17. Provide a street light at the ingress to the property as well as every 200 feet along the frontage of the property. 18. The City desires to pave the entire width of Van Buren Street at the completion of this egotiate with City to perform said work. 19. -wide easement. 20. The annexation to the City Streetlight and Landscape District must occur before the recordation of the Tract Map. 21. The private roa 22. Parking shall only be permitted on one side of Tesoro Street. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 28 A.1.c CITY OF COLTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER & WASTEWATERDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FILE NUMBER:Tentative Tract Map 14-01 (TTM No. 16-01)DATE: May 4, 2016 PROJECT NAME: Sewer improvement and service connectionsfor TRACT 18071. Subdivision of 1.96 Acres into 17 Single Lots. ADDRESS:22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street (between MT Vernon Ave and Gage Canal) Grand Terrace, CA 1.THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH BY THE WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT FOR SEWER AND PRE-TREATMENT FACILITIES. 2.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (GREEN BOOK), AND THE CURRENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF COLTON WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. 3.WASTEWATER QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO WATER/WASTEWATER DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT. NO PROJECT WILL BE APPROVED UNLESS THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR PLAN CHECK. 4.DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER PREPARE ASEWER IMPROVEMENT PLAN. THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWER CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING ON-SITE SEWER MAIN OR THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WITH THE REQUIRED CLEANOUT AT PROPERTY LINE. SEWER CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS THE SEWER CALCULATIONS TO SUPPORT THE DESIGN. 5.CONSTRUCTION OF ALL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PER THE APPROVED SEWER PLANS. 6.THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT A WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND DIRECTOR OF WATER AND WASTEWATER. ADDITIONAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE OR FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPER BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE STUDY. 7. COMPATIBLE ELECTRONIC FILE FOR FUTURE ARCHIVING AND GIS CONVERSION AFTER ALL CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AND ADDITIONS REQUESTED BY THE WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE PLANS. 8.DEVELOPER SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS AND SHOW SAID EASEMENTS ON ALL PLANS. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ENCROACHMENT. 9.THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONNECT THE PROPOSED SEWER PIPELINE TO THE EXISTING SEWER MAIN ALONG PICO STREET. IF THE PROJECT REQUIRES A SEWER MAIN LOCATED OR EXTENDS ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. ANY EASEMENT ISSUES SHALL BE SETTLED EITHER BEFORE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP, OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 29 A.1.c 10.DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS FROM THE NEAREST CITY GRAVITY MAIN IF ONE DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST, PER CITY OF COLTON STANDARD DRAWINGS NO.124, NO.201, NO.308, AND NO.312. LICENSE: CONTRACTORS PERFORMING THIS WORK ARE - DEVELOPER IS ALSO REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW SEWER CLEANOUT AT PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL NEW SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS TO CITY SEWER PER COLTON STANDARD DRAWING NO.308. 11.ANY SUBDIVISION OF A SINGLE PARCEL INTO MULTIPLE PARCELS REQUIRES SEPARATE SEWER SERVICES FOR EACH PARCEL WHEN DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. 12. OFFSETS, AND PROVIDE ONE VIDEOTAPE TO THE UTILITIES INSPECTOR AND ONE TAPE TO THE DEVELOPER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY CITY. 13.ALL WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FEES MAY APPLY IF THE ACTUAL DISCHARGE EXCEEDS THE ESTIMATED FLOW ESTABLISHED DURING INITIAL APPROVAL. SERVICE WILL BE TERMINATED IF THE FEES ARE NOT PAID. 14.ALL CONNECTION FEES AND CHARGES SHALL BE LEVIED AT RATE SCHEDULED BY CITY COUNCIL AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BY DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER SHALL REMIT SEWER CONNECTION FEES TO THE CITY OF COLTON WATER/WASTEWATER DIVISION. 15.BOND AND CONSTRUCT ALL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS PER THE APPROVED SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS. THE PROJECT DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A BOND TO THE CITY GUARANTEEING THE INSTALLATION OF ALL SEWER INFRASTRUCTURES AND SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OR OTHERWISE REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE BOND, FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAN. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 30 A.1.c Exhibit 4 Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 31 A.1.c Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 32 A.1.c Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 33 A.1.c Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 34 A.1.d RESOLUTION NO. 2016- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING VARIANCE 16-01, SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 16-01, AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVING LOT LAYOUT AND ARCHITECTURAL AND FLOOR PLANS FOR A SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF 17 LOTS LOCATED AT 22394 AND 22404 VAN BUREN STREET (APNS 1167-341-02, 78 AND 79) WHEREAS, filed applications for Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604) to subdivide two acres into a small lot subdivision totaling 17 lots. A concurrent Variance application (Variance 16-01) was submitted to deviate from the lot standards for Lots 11 and 12; along with Site and Architectural Review 16-01 for approval of the site layout, architectural plans and pursuant to Planned Residential Development standards. WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned R3-Medium Density Residential and designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map, located 1167-341- 02, -78, and -79). The Project site contains two single family residences. WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for an environmental exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the property has no value as habitat for any rare, endangered, or threatened species, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. WHEREAS, on September 1, 2016, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing at the Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332. The Notice of Exemption prepared in connection with the Packet Pg. 35 A.1.d Project has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and is recommended for adoption. 2. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Variance 16-01 relating to setbacks for Lots 11 and 12: a. A special circumstance regarding the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property exists. The irregular polygon shaped parcel is narrower to the north and due to this narrowness and design of emergency turn around necessitates the need for a lesser setback for Lots 11 and 12. b. Because of the special circumstance, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The a viable and functional housing product on Lots 11 and 12. Strict application of the zoning code would result in a lesser number of lots with lot sizes greater than the intent of the PDR standards for small lot subdivisions. c. The granting of the variance will not constitute the grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the property is situated. The granting of the variance would not grant a special privilege; rather it will provide the ability to develop the subject lot at comparable densities as adjacent properties and as anticipated in the General Plan. d. The granting of the variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the district governing the parcel of property. The granting of the variance would not authorize an unpermitted use because small lot subdivisions are permitted in the R3 zone district. e. The granting of the variance will not result in a situation inconsistent with the latest adopted general plan. The density of 8.5 is consistent with the MDR General Plan designation which planned for a maximum density of 12 units per acre. f. Conditions necessary to secure the above findings are made a part of the approval of the variance. 3. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Architectural and Site Review 16-01: a. The Project site is consistent with the Zoning Code and General Plan. Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) The proposed Project has a density of 8.5 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation. The MDR designation allows single and multiple family development. The detached small lot subdivision is permissible in the land use. The Project conforms to several General Plan policies relating Packet Pg. 36 A.1.d to the construction of roadways and utilities to serve the Project, and Housing Element policies to encourage housing development of various types and designs. The Project is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, except for Lots 11 and 12 which will have a lesser side yard setback. However, consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, the Applicant has filed a Variance application. The Project complies with all other development standards of the PRD Ordinance includes setbacks, building height and parking requirements. b. The location and configuration of all structures associated with this Project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, that they do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy, that they do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design and appearance of the proposed homes complement and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the site will be appropriately landscaped to enhance street views. c. The architectural design of structures, their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the surrounding development, natural landforms, are functional for the Project and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The proposed buildings are Mediterranean style with roof tiles, stucco finishes, arched doorways, and extensive architectural features on all four sides of the buildings. Primary colors are neutral earth tones, with use of accent colors on the window shutters and awnings. d. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provide a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the natural landscape of the area and nearby developments. The site will be landscaped with trees and shrubs, and will be visually pleasing. e. There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus the natural beauty of the City, its setting, and natural landforms are preserved. The subject site is a vacant and grading will be necessary to support the development. Slopes will be appropriately landscaped. f. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. 4. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Section 18.10.090 Packet Pg. 37 A.1.d Planned Residential Development: a. The development includes only uses allowed within the base zoning district. The R3-Medium Density Residential designation allows infill residential development subject to R3 standards, and the Project conforms to those standards. b. The development is compatible with other development within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed project. The Project is compatible with the zoning district and general neighborhood which is a mixture of single and multiple family residential housing. The small lot subdivision provides a transition from between traditional detached single family uses and attached multiple family uses to the north. c. The project would produce a development of higher quality and greater excellence of design than that might otherwise result from using the standard development regulations. The Project is a higher quality residential project, with moderate sized homes and enhanced building architecture. d. The subject site is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development. The site is small infill lot, constrained by lot configurations; however, the site is able to accommodate the project density. e. The project includes improved quality of life provisions and enhanced amenities, including an additional and appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, common open space, landscaping, parking areas, private open space, and sustainable improvement standards. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Site and Architectural Review 16-01 and Variance 16-01 are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Site and Architectural Review 16-01 and Variance 16-01 is approved to construct 17 residential homes on 17 lots created by Tentative Tract Map 16- 01 (TTM 18604), including a granting a variance to construct residences on Lots 11 and 12 with 5 feet side yard setbacks on property located at 22394 and 1167-341-02, -78, and -79). This approval is granted based on the application materials submitted by Aegis Builders, Inc. represented by Darryl Moore on April 14, Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) 2016, as modified on July 21, 2016, and August 10, 2016, including the revised tentative tract map, site plan, architectural elevations/floor plans and conceptual landscape plan. These plans are approved as submitted and condition 2. ned herein, and shall not be further altered except as modified by these Packet Pg. 38 A.1.d conditions of approval, and unless reviewed and approved by the affected departments. 3. This approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of adoption of this resolution unless the use has been inaugurated or a time extension has been granted by the City, in accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code. Time extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand Terrace and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Grand Terrace concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the Planning Commission, or Planning and Development Services Director. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 5. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically modified to comply with state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies, or must be approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals 6. In the event that exhibits and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. 7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Building and Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in the Memorandum dated August 3, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Works Department, including the conditions of approval contained in the Memorandum dated August 23, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Colton Public Works Department Water & Wastewater Department, including the conditions of approval contained in their letter dated May 4, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in their letter dated July 27, 2016, attached hereto attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 11. The location and method of screening for all roof-mounted and building- Packet Pg. 39 A.1.d mounted equipment shall be demonstrated on the elevations, including but not limited to, air conditioning and heating units, and utility boxes. All equipment shall be screened from public view and designed to be an integral component of the building design. 12. All ground mounted equipment, including utility boxes and backflow devices shall comply with all utility and Fire Department requirements and be screened in a manner that does not impede traffic visibility. 13. The shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the site, including parking lot paving condition and striping, clearing of trash, weeds and debris, lighting, landscaping, including parkway landscaping, and other site improvements. All parking facilities shall be maintained in good condition. The maintenance thereof may include, but shall not be limited to the repaving, sealing, and striping of a parking area and the repair, restoration and/or replacement of any parking area design features when deemed necessary by the City to insure the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. 14. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activities are allowed on Sundays and federal holidays except for emergencies, and/or subject to approval by the Building Official, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 15. Prior to the installation of any signs, a Sign Permit application shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department for review and approval. All signs shall be conform to the sign regulation of the R3 zone district, as contained in Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 16. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be prepared using Best Management Practices designed to control onsite products from entering the Santa Ana River. The WQMP shall comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 17. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Tentative Tract Map 18604 shall have been recorded and a mylar provided to the City. 18. All construction equipment shall be equipped with suitable muffler systems. Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) 19. All construction activity related to this project shall comply with the City=s Noise Ordinance as stipulated in Chapter 8.108 of the Municipal Code. 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit three Packet Pg. 40 A.1.d (3) copies of a final photometric plan to the Planning and Development Services Department. The photometric plan shall include location, details of all lighting fixtures and luminaries, and shall demonstrate compliance with the Zoning Code and this approval. Lighting shall be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways, and as determined by the Planning and Development Services Director, light standards may be required to be shielded. Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface. 21. All contractors working on this project shall acquire a valid City business license. 22. Each dwelling unit shall be equipped with roll up garage doors. 23. Final landscape and irrigation plans will be required to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 15.56 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. a. A legend shall be incorporated onto final landscape plan that clearly identifies the plant material to be installed. b. No trees shall be planted within the sewer and storm drain easements. c. Final landscape and irrigation plan will be required to incorporate parkway trees in compliance with Chapter 12.28 of the Municipal Code. 24. All perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. 25. Perimeter walls shall be constructed prior to acceptance of the final map, and adjacent owner authorization shall be obtained prior to construction on shared property lines. 26. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any building, all grading shall be completed and retaining and screen walls, dry and wet utilities, drainage facilities driveways shall be installed. 27. The applicant shall submit a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R's) establishing a Home Owner's Association subject to review and approval by the Community and Development Director and the City Attorney approval. Such declaration shall set forth provisions for maintenance of all common areas, payment of taxes and all other privileges and responsibilities of the common ownership. The CC&R's shall include provisions prohibiting the homeowners' association (HOA) from quitclaiming, selling or otherwise transferring the land held in common ownership to private Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) property owners. The shall include the following provisions: a. The City shall be made a party of the CC&R's. The City's participation shall be specifically limited to enforcement of the HOA's maintenance obligation. Packet Pg. 41 A.1.d b. The provisions of approved CC&R's shall not be amended without the prior approval of the Planning and Development Services Director and City Attorney who at his or her discretion may refer the matter to the Planning Commission. Requests for amendments to existing CC&R's shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department. c. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall disclose the location of the existing ten (10) foot sewer and drainage easements, and shall state that no permanent structural encroachments shall be installed within the easements. d. Privacy fencing, concrete stoops or pavers, and plant material, excluding trees, shall be permitted within the easements. However, the property owner shall obtain an encroachment permit, and enter into a hold harmless agreement with the City of Grand Terrace, in the event that these improvements must be removed to access the easement. Replacement of these materials shall be at the expense of the property owner and/or association. 28. 29. All private streets, driveways, walkways, parking areas, landscaped areas, storage areas, screening, sewers, drainage facilities, utilities, open space, recreation facilities and other improvements not dedicated to public use shall be maintained by the property owners. Provisions acceptable to the affected City Departments shall be made for the preservation and maintenance of all such improvements prior to the issuance of building permits. 30. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant must sign and return an of form. The form and content shall be prepared by the Planning and Development Services Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, st California, at a regular meeting held on the 1 day of September, 2016. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) ABSTAIN: Packet Pg. 42 A.1.d ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Pat Jacquez-Nares Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: PC Resolution_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 43 A.1.e Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Date: August 3, 2013 Applicant:Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Darryl Moore Address of Applicant: 2331 W. Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Site Location: 22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street, Tentative Tract No.16-01 Arch. Review 16-01, Variance 16-01 and Environmental 16-02, proposed Tract Map No. 18604. W.O. # 12-2.1143 Provide four (4) construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project. Below is a list of the plans and documents Building and Safetywill need for plan review. The initial plan review will take approximately three weeks on most projects. You have received a work order number:12-2.1143 for the proposed project, this number will be needed to obtain information regarding your plan review. Plan review fees and permit fees will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to issue. Provide the following sets of plans and documents. Building and Safety submittal’s required at first plan review. (4)Architectural Plans (4)Structural Plans (2)Structural Calculations (4)Plot/Site Plans (4)Electrical Plans (4)Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4)Mechanical Plans (4)Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations (2) Soils and Hydrology Reports Building & Safety General Information All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2013California Building Code, 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, and the 2013 California Electrical Packet Pg. 44 A.1.e Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Code, 2013Residential Code and the 2013California Green Buildings Standardsadopted by the State of California. If the building plans are submitted before January 1, 2017 the plans will be reviewed under the 2013 California Building Codes, however if the plans are submitted after January 1, 2017 the plans will be reviewed under the 2016California Building Codes. All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standardsor standards approved by the Public Works Director or City Engineer. The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection requests can be made twenty four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fenceand screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at alltimes to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer type shall conform to ANSI ZA.3. Prior to building permits, applicant shall enter into a recycling agreement for construction waste according to Ordinance No. 243.A deposit will be required as part of this ordinance. Recycling receipts from the recycled company responsible for accepting the materials shall be kept in the construction office for viewing by the City Inspector.Burrtec Waste Industries has a Franchise Agreement with the City to recycle waste. Waste from the project will need to be disposed at a Burrtec Waste Industries facility. No waste shall be disposed of at any other waste facility. If waste is disposed of at an unapproved facility, funds from the deposit willbe used to offset the waste stream. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items isin place and approved by Building & Safety and the Planning Department. (A)Installation of a construction trailer. or, (B)Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Packet Pg. 45 A.1.e Building and Safety Conditions of Approval Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Building Permit Conditions 1.Prior to issuanceof building permits, on site water service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency. On site fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the fire hydrants are established and approved. 2.Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevation and set backs of the structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the precise grading plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. 3.Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from the City of Colton Waste Water Department. 4.All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES)and the current San Bernardino County MS4stormwaterpermit. Packet Pg. 46 A.1.e Exhibit 2 Public Works Conditions of Approval Date: August 23, 2016 Applicant: Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Darryl Moore Address of Applicant: 2331 W. Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Site Location: 22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street, Tentative Tract No.16-01 Arch. Review 16-01, Variance 16-01 and Environmental 16-02, proposed Tract Map No. 18604. Provide construction plans and required documentation for review of the proposed project as follows: (1) Grant Deed showing all easements. (1) Street Water Utility Plans. (1) Street Improvement Plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (1) Tentative Tract Map Plans (1) Sewer Plan Sheets (1) Rough and Precise Grading Plans (1) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) and Erosion Control Plan (1) Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (1) Soils, Hydrology, and Hydraulics Reports All work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standards or standards approved by the Public Works Director. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers and such facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Special Conditions: 1. The existing street power pole owned by Edison shall be underground. 2. Street cut permits are required before work begins in the public right of way. A street cut deposit will be collected for each street cut and held for two years. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 47 A.1.e 3. The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing or damaged public improvements. The missing or damaged public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, and street lights. 4. Provide half street width paving overlay after utility installations on the entire length of the project. Minimum 2 inch asphalt overlay with an asphalt grind. All Grindings shall be recycled. 5. The Applicant shall submit proposed sewer plans to the City of Colton for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the sewer review to the City of Colton. City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 6. The applicant shall submit proposed water plans to the Riverside Highland Water Company for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the water review to Riverside Highland Water Company. Please provide Serve letter and approved plans to the City of Grand Terrace before any permits are issued. 7. Applicant shall submit proposed water plans for fire hydrants to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department for plan review. Applicant shall pay all plan review fees and permit fees for the fire hydrant system review to the County of San Bernardino Fire Department. 8. Submit the proposed tract map to the City of Riverside Gage Canal Department for conditions and approvals. This project may require new curb and gutter as well as an approach next to the existing gates of the Gage Canal. Obtain a construction encroachment permit from Riverside Gage Canal. 9. Provide 11-foot right of way dedication on Van Buren Street along the entire frontage of the property and provide paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping and repave to a half width street improvement. Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street flows for drainage and traffic. 10. The street curb returns and ramps at the intersection on Tesoro Court and Van Buren Street shall be constructed per San Bernardino County Standard 110. The radius of these curbs shall be a minimum of 30 feet. 11. Minimum driveway grades shall be consistent with San Bernardino County Standard 131. Riverside County Standard driveway approach can also be used. 12. Monumentation: If any activity on this project disturbs any survey monuments, the disturbed monumnetation shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 48 A.1.e prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb the monumnetation, and a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filled with the County. 13. Provide a letter from adjacent property owners giving their consent to allowing the relocation of their stormdrain and any other utility line that may need relocation. Also said letter should give their consent to allowing the proposed connection to their utility line. If no such consent is given, developer must provide separate utility lines to serve the new development. agreement for any shared utilities. 14. A blockwall is required around the perimeter of the property. 15. All existing easements must be shown on improvement plans and tract map. 16. Tesoro Street must be dedicated to the City as Public Access Easement and Utilities Easement. 17. Provide a street light at the ingress to the property as well as every 200 feet along the frontage of the property. 18. The City desires to pave the entire width of Van Buren Street at the completion of this egotiate with City to perform said work. 19. -wide easement. 20. The annexation to the City Streetlight and Landscape District must occur before the recordation of the Tract Map. 21. The private roa 22. Parking shall only be permitted on one side of Tesoro Street. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 49 A.1.e CITY OF COLTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER & WASTEWATERDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FILE NUMBER:Tentative Tract Map 14-01 (TTM No. 16-01)DATE: May 4, 2016 PROJECT NAME: Sewer improvement and service connectionsfor TRACT 18071. Subdivision of 1.96 Acres into 17 Single Lots. ADDRESS:22394 & 22404 Van Buren Street (between MT Vernon Ave and Gage Canal) Grand Terrace, CA 1.THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH BY THE WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT FOR SEWER AND PRE-TREATMENT FACILITIES. 2.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (GREEN BOOK), AND THE CURRENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF COLTON WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. 3.WASTEWATER QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO WATER/WASTEWATER DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT. NO PROJECT WILL BE APPROVED UNLESS THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR PLAN CHECK. 4.DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER PREPARE ASEWER IMPROVEMENT PLAN. THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWER CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING ON-SITE SEWER MAIN OR THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WITH THE REQUIRED CLEANOUT AT PROPERTY LINE. SEWER CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS THE SEWER CALCULATIONS TO SUPPORT THE DESIGN. 5.CONSTRUCTION OF ALL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PER THE APPROVED SEWER PLANS. 6.THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT A WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND DIRECTOR OF WATER AND WASTEWATER. ADDITIONAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE OR FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPER BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE STUDY. 7. COMPATIBLE ELECTRONIC FILE FOR FUTURE ARCHIVING AND GIS CONVERSION AFTER ALL CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AND ADDITIONS REQUESTED BY THE WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE PLANS. 8.DEVELOPER SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS AND SHOW SAID EASEMENTS ON ALL PLANS. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ENCROACHMENT. 9.THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONNECT THE PROPOSED SEWER PIPELINE TO THE EXISTING SEWER MAIN ALONG PICO STREET. IF THE PROJECT REQUIRES A SEWER MAIN LOCATED OR EXTENDS ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. ANY EASEMENT ISSUES SHALL BE SETTLED EITHER BEFORE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP, OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 50 A.1.e 10.DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS FROM THE NEAREST CITY GRAVITY MAIN IF ONE DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST, PER CITY OF COLTON STANDARD DRAWINGS NO.124, NO.201, NO.308, AND NO.312. LICENSE: CONTRACTORS PERFORMING THIS WORK ARE - DEVELOPER IS ALSO REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW SEWER CLEANOUT AT PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL NEW SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS TO CITY SEWER PER COLTON STANDARD DRAWING NO.308. 11.ANY SUBDIVISION OF A SINGLE PARCEL INTO MULTIPLE PARCELS REQUIRES SEPARATE SEWER SERVICES FOR EACH PARCEL WHEN DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. 12. OFFSETS, AND PROVIDE ONE VIDEOTAPE TO THE UTILITIES INSPECTOR AND ONE TAPE TO THE DEVELOPER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY CITY. 13.ALL WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FEES MAY APPLY IF THE ACTUAL DISCHARGE EXCEEDS THE ESTIMATED FLOW ESTABLISHED DURING INITIAL APPROVAL. SERVICE WILL BE TERMINATED IF THE FEES ARE NOT PAID. 14.ALL CONNECTION FEES AND CHARGES SHALL BE LEVIED AT RATE SCHEDULED BY CITY COUNCIL AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BY DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER SHALL REMIT SEWER CONNECTION FEES TO THE CITY OF COLTON WATER/WASTEWATER DIVISION. 15.BOND AND CONSTRUCT ALL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS PER THE APPROVED SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS. THE PROJECT DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A BOND TO THE CITY GUARANTEEING THE INSTALLATION OF ALL SEWER INFRASTRUCTURES AND SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OR OTHERWISE REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE BOND, FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAN. Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 51 A.1.e Exhibit 4 Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 52 A.1.e Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 53 A.1.e Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 54 A.1.e Attachment: Exhibits, Conditions of Approval \[Revision 1\] (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 55 A.1.f CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Community Development County of San Bernardino Department nd 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2 Floor City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Project Title: Site and Architectural Review 16-01, Variance 16-01, Tentative Tract Map 16- 01 and Environmental 16-05 Project Location Specific: The project is located on lots APN: 1167-341-02, 1167-341-03 and 1167-341-38 in the County of San Bernardino. Description of Project: Construct 17 single family residences and front yard landscaping within the boundaries of Tentative Tract Map 18604, a 17 lot subdivision. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Grand Terrace Planning Commission Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: Mr. Darryl E. Moore Exempt Status: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, Infill Development Projects Reasons Why Project is Exempt: Section 15332, This section exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code; is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the property has no value as habitat for rare, endangered, or threatened species; the site is served by public utilities and services; and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality, or water quality. Lead Agency or Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone (909) 824-6621 ______________________________ _________________ Sandra Molina Date Community Development Director Attachment: Notice of Exemption_SA 16-01 (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) C:\\users\\jlambarena\\appdata\\local\\temp\\minutetraq\\grandterracecityca@grandterracecityca.iqm2.com\\work\\attachments\\3512.doc 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600 Packet Pg. 56 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 57 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 58 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 59 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 60 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 61 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 62 A.1.g Attachment: Color and Material Boards (1987 : Tentative Tract Map 16-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18604)) Packet Pg. 63 A.2 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE:September 1, 2016 TITLE:Zoning Code Amendment 16-01 PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION:1)Conduct a public hearing and 2)Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONOF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TABLE 18.10.030 (PERMITTED USES) OF SECTION 18.10.030 (USE REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) AS IT PERTAINS TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS AND CATS PER HOUSEHOLD 2030 VISION STATEMENT: Grand Terrace is an exceptionally safe and well managed City, known for its natural beauty and recreational opportunities; a vibrant and diverse local economy; a place where residents enjoy an outstanding quality of life that fosters pride and an engaged community, encouraging families to come and remain for generations. PROPOSAL: Zoning Code Amendment 16-01 proposes to amend the Residential Chapter of the Zoning Code as it pertains to the keeping of cats and dogs, to allow a maximum of four pets, in any combination (i.e. 4 dogs, 4 cats, 3 dogs/1 cat, 3 cats/1 dog, etc.), as long as the total does not exceed four. ANALYSIS: maximum of four animals. Several years ago, the City management at that time, made a determination that more than two dogs could be licensed per household as long as thetotal did not exceed four. Additionally, state law requires jurisdictions to license all dogs as mechanism of ensuring that they are vaccinated. This then results in a situation where the City must Packet Pg. 64 A.2 license, yet turn around and enforce the Zoning Code limit. A review of nearby jurisdictions revealed that most of the cities allow at least four dogs within residential dwellings: Jurisdiction Number of animals allows Grand Terrace 2 dogs and 2 cats, maximum of 4, but no more than 2 dogs and 2 cats Colton 10 dogs Loma Linda 4 dogs and 4 cats, maximum of 8, but no more than 4 dogs and 4 cats City of Riverside Maximum 4 dogs, and maximum 10 cats City of Redlands Maximum 3 dogs and maximum 3 cats, 6 total County of Riverside Maximum 4 dogs, and maximum 9 cats County of San Based on size of property. A 7,200 square foot lot (R1 lot) is Bernardino allowed a total of two animals (dogs/cats), a lot of 20,000 square feet is maxed out at a total of 5. The proposed amendment to allow a combination of four dogs and/or cats, or any combination not to exceed four is consistent with past practice and is in keeping with adjacent jurisdictions that allow a maximum of four dogs. ATTACHMENTS: PC Resolution_ZCA 16-01 (DOC) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 08/25/2016 10:01 AM City Attorney Completed 08/25/2016 10:40 AM Sandra Molina Completed 08/25/2016 1:14 PM Planning Commission Pending 09/01/2016 6:30 PM Packet Pg. 65 A.2.a RESOLUTION NO. 2016- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TABLE 18.10.030 (PERMITTED USES) OF SECTION 18.10.030 (USE REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) AS IT PERTAINS TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS AND CATS PER HOUSEHOLD WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65800 and 65850 of the California Government Code, the City may adopt ordinances to regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space, and other purposes; to regulate the location, height, bulk, number of stories and size of buildings and structures, the size and use of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces, the percentage of a lot which may be occupied by a building or structure, and the intensity of land use; and to establish requirements for off-street parking, in compliance with the California Government Code. WHEREAS, the Zoning Code presently allows a resident to keep a maximum of four pets consisting of two dogs and two cats; WHEREAS, City desires to amend the Zoning Code so that families have the option of keeping any combination of pets, as long as the total number does not exceed four. WHEREAS, the Project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) which states that activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment is not subject to CEQA because the zoning overlay and establishment of provisions for transitional residential uses does not result in any direct or reasonably foreseeable impact to the environment. WHEREAS, on September 13, 2016, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace introduced the herein ordinance to revise Chapter 18.10 (Residential Districts) of Title 18 of the Municipal Code; and Attachment: PC Resolution_ZCA 16-01 \[Revision 1\] (1992 : Zoning Code Amendment 16-01) WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, as follows 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Packet Pg. 66 A.2.a the above Recitals, are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Project is not subject to environmental review pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) of CEQA. 3. Based on substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the September 1, 2016, public hearing, including public testimony, and written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission specifically finds as follows with regard to Zone Code Amendment 16-01: a. The Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the city because the Zoning Code already allows a maximum of four pets comprised of two dogs and two cats. The Code would merely provide residents the option of keeping a maximum of four pets total, dogs and/or cats. b. The Code Amendment will not be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because it will not preclude the continued use and/or development of surrounding properties. c. The Code Amendment is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan because the General Plan designates residential land uses within the City, and the keeping of pets is a quality of life issue for many Grand Terrace residents. It also promotes Goal 2.1 to provide for b maintenance of a healthy diversified community. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find the Project exempt from CEQA. 5. The Planning Commission hereby further recommends that the City Council amend Paragraph B of Table 18.10.030 (Permitted Uses) of Section 18.10.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 18.10 (Residential District, as follows: 6. The City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Attachment: PC Resolution_ZCA 16-01 \[Revision 1\] (1992 : Zoning Code Amendment 16-01) Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 67 A.2.a PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, st California, at a regular meeting held on the 1 day of September, 2016. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Pat Jacquez-Nares Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: PC Resolution_ZCA 16-01 \[Revision 1\] (1992 : Zoning Code Amendment 16-01) Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 68 A.2.a Exhibit 1 Section 18.10.030 - Use regulations. Uses listed in Table 18.10.030 shall be allowed in one or more of the residential districts as indicated in the columns below each district heading. Permitted uses are indicated by the letter "P" while the letter "C" indicates uses which require a conditional use permit. TABLE 18.10.030 PERMITTED USES R3-R3- RH R20 R10 R7.2 R2 R3 S 20 B. Residential Accessory Structures d Accessory Structure P P P P P P P P Second Family Unit (As Permitted Per P P P P P P - - Chapter 18.63) Guest House C C C C C C - - Private Garage P P P P P P - P d Private Swimming Pool P P P P P P P P Home occupation (As Permitted Per Chapter d P P P P P P P P 5.06) Keeping of Cats and Dogs (No more than four dogs, or more than four cats, or a d P P P P P P P P combination of dogs and cats that total no more than Four (4)Maximum of Two (2) Each) Other Accessory Uses (As Approved by the d P P P P P P P P Planning Director) Attachment: PC Resolution_ZCA 16-01 \[Revision 1\] (1992 : Zoning Code Amendment 16-01) Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 69