Loading...
09-03-2015 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER Convene the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Attendee NamePresentAbsentLateArrived Chairman Tom Comstock¨¨¨ Vice-Chairman Ryan Stephens¨¨¨ Commissioner Jeffrey Allen¨¨¨ Commissioner Tara Ceseña¨¨¨ Commissioner Edward A. Giroux¨¨¨ Community DevelopmentDirector Sandra Molina¨¨¨ Assistant City Attorney Ivy Tsai¨¨¨ Secretary Jessica Lambarena¨¨¨ APPROVAL OF ADENGA PUBLICADDRESS Public address to the Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community Development Department. This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Chairman may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. City of Grand TerracePage 1 AgendaGrand Terrace Planning CommissionSeptember 3, 2015 A.CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 04/16/2015 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Site and Architectural Review 15-03 and Environmental 15-05 Located at 22247 Pico Street RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-__, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 15-03 TO CONSTRUCT 12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON 12 APPROVED LOTS LOCATED AT 22247 PICO STREET DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS D.INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS ADJOURN Adjourn to the next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission to be held on September 17, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. than 14 calendar days preceding the meeting. City of Grand Terrace Page 2 A.1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Council ChambersRegular Meeting6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER Chairman Comstock convened the Meeting of the Planning Commission and Site and Architectural Review Board at 6:30 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Giroux. Attendee NameTitleStatusArrived Tom ComstockChairmanPresent Ryan StephensVice-ChairmanAbsent Jeffrey AllenCommissionerPresent Tara CeseñaCommissionerPresent Edward A. GirouxCommissionerPresent Sandra MolinaCommunity Development DirectorPresent Jessica LambarenaSecretaryPresent Ivy TsaiAssistant City AttorneyPresent PRESENTATIONS None PUBLIC ADDRESS Jeffrey McConnell, Grand Terrace resident, announced the Lions Club would host a breakfast and tickets would be available for sale. A.CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman Comstock Stated corrections needed to be made on the Minutes dated December 18, 2014 corrected to title of Deputy City Attorney Elena Q. Gerli for the Grand Terrace Planning Commission. 1.Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 12/18/2014 City of Grand TerracePage 1 Packet Pg. 3 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 RESULT: ACCEPTED \[UNANIMOUS\] AYES: Tom Comstock, Jeffrey Allen, Tara Cesena, Edward A. Giroux ABSENT: Ryan Stephens 2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting 01/15/2015 RESULT: ACCEPTED \[UNANIMOUS\] AYES: Tom Comstock, Jeffrey Allen, Tara Cesena, Edward A. Giroux ABSENT: Ryan Stephens B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract Map 14-01 (Tentative Tract Map No. 18071) Chairman Comstock reflected corrections to tentative tract map number, which previously read, Tentative Tract Map, 14-01/ Tract Map Number 18071 and had been revised to read Tentative Tract Map 15-01 Tentative Tract Map Number 18793. Community Development Director Sandra Molina presented Tentative Tract Map 15-01 and provided a summary of the power-point presentation. Director Molina described the proposed project as one lot subdivided into 12 single family lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, and described the variance associated with the project. The variance was due to the triangular shape of the site. Chairman Comstock opened the Public Hearing at 6:43 p.m. Darryl Moore have a positive and beneficial impact on the City of Grand Terrace. He recommended that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 15-01. Jeffrey McConnell, Grand Terrace resident and business owner, felt the tentative tract map is a great project and would have a positive impact on the City of Grand Terrace. Chairman Comstock stated he reviewed the map and applauded the applicant for a marvelous job done on the tentative tract map. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) There being no further comments in favor or in opposition, Chairman Comstock closed Public Hearing at 6:47 p.m. City of Grand Terrace Page 2 Packet Pg. 4 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2015-02, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15-01 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18793) A SUBDIVISION OF A 3.2-ACRE PARCEL INTO 12 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT 22247 PICO STREET. RESULT: APPROVED \[UNANIMOUS\] AYES: Tom Comstock, Jeffrey Allen, Tara Cesena, Edward A. Giroux ABSENT: Ryan Stephens 2. Approval of Site and Architectural Review 14-06, Administrative Site and Architectural Review 14-08 and Environmental 14-03 for Construction of a 1,615 Square Foot Single Family Residence, and a 1,200 Square Foot Second Dwelling Unit on the Property Described as APN: 0275-282-14 and Located at 11832 Burns Avenue Commissioner Giroux, recused himself at 6:50 p.m. from participating in the discussion for Items 2 and 3 because he lives near the proposed projects. He also stated he did not know the developers. Community Development Director Molina provided the staff report for the project describing the 1,615 square foot single family residence, and 1,200 square foot second dwelling unit on the property. She stated that Mr. Jerome also owns the property behind the subject parcel. She stated the proposed primary and secondary dwelling units are permitted by the Zoning Code, provided that the property owner lived in one of the homes on the subject property. Director Molina stated the public notice was provided consistent with state law and staff recommended to approve the item. Commissioner Allen asked if applicant owned both lots. Community Development Director Molina confirmed the applicant was the owner. Director Molina added that Riverside Highland Water Company has asked the City to start requiring water conservation measures on new construction. Ms. Molina stated the second dwelling unit meets the development provisions of the Zoning Code. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) Chairman Comstock opened the Public Hearing at 6:56 p.m. Virginia Hernandez, Grand Terrace resident, stated she had lived in the City of Grand Terrace for forty-five years and felt that the area did not need any more residential homes constructed. She stated the applicant had asked her if her home could be surveyed she declined at that time and made him aware that her home had already been surveyed. The survey that was recorded with the San Bernardino County recorders department. Ms. Hernandez concluded by stating she opposed the item. City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Packet Pg. 5 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 Michael Simon, Grand Terrace resident, stated he opposed the item because there was not enough square footage and the easement was a problem. He was concerned with who would be enforcing the applicant to occupy the residence and who would enforce the maintenance of the property if the owner decided to move. There being no further speakers in favor or in opposition, Chairman Comstock closed Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m. Chairman Comstock asked if property owner had enough square footage to cover the two dwellings including the easement. Assistant City Attorney Tsai answered yes and explained there was not a problem because the City looked at the entire lot size and the easement was included in the size. Community Development Director Molina responded to Mr. Simon's concerns that the owner could not have two rentals and now must occupy one of the dwellings on the property. Director Molina stated the applicant has more than the required amount, to support two dwellings. Rick Morse, applicant's representative, stated the applicant strived to maintain a good relationship with their neighbors while taking into consideration the neighborhoods concerns. He stated he had difficulties obtaining the survey and was glad that the neighbor had surveyed her property which was done exceptionally well and helped him with his findings. Commissioner Allen asked Mr. Morse if the property owner intended to occupy the home. Rick Morse, applicant's representative, confirmed the property owner did intended to occupy the front parcel. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2015-03, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 14-06, AND Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 14-08 TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A SECOND FAMILY UNIT ON A PARCEL LOCATED AT 11832 BURNS AVENUE (APN 0275-282-14) City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Packet Pg. 6 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 RESULT: APPROVED \[3 TO 0\] AYES: Tom Comstock, Jeffrey Allen, Tara Cesena ABSENT: Ryan Stephens RECUSED: Edward A. Giroux 3. Approval of Site and Architectural Review (SA) 14-07 and Environmental 14-04 for The Construction of a Two Story Residence on the Property Described as APN: 0275-282- 20 And Located South of Vivienda Avenue, Approximately 160 Feet West of Burns Avenue Commissioner Giroux had previously recused himself from participating in the discussion for this Item. Community Development Director Molina presented the project, including a Powerpoint presentation. Director Molina stated the project met the structural setbacks, and access to utility easements would be obtained. She stated that the applicant added articulation to the rear of the home, and the project met the development standards. Director Molina stated public notice was provided consistent with state law and she received feedback from the neighbors, some of which were present in the audience. Director Molina recommended approval of the project. Chairman Comstock opened the Public Hearing at 7:17 p.m. Juanita Odenbaugh, Grand Terrace resident, stated she opposed the three-thousand square foot two-story home to be constructed because it would set precedence in a community mostly built of one-story homes and her family would lose their privacy. The two-story structure would oversee her backyard. Ms. Odenbaugh stated that historically the neighborhood did not have any two-story homes and her source from wikipedia defined the home as a McMansion. She asked what type of business the applicant would be conducting in the second dwelling. Virginia Fernandez, Grand Terrace resident, stated she had been a Grand Terrace resident for forty-five years and opposed the two story home construction and suggested a one-story. Logan Odenbaugh, Grand Terrace resident, stated he opposed the two-story home construction because he would lose the outdoor privacy he currently has with his family. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) Michael Simon, Grand Terrace resident, stated he opposed the two-story home construction because the property owners would have access from their balcony to look directly into his backyard. He felt the two-story home was not a good fit for the neighborhood and stated he was not successful in communicating with the applicant to discuss his concerns. John Odenbaugh Grand Terrace resident stated he opposed the two-story home construction. City of Grand Terrace Page 5 Packet Pg. 7 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 Rick Morse, applicant's representative, stated he respected the concerns of the neighbors and it was his goal to make the home construction as appealing as possible and respected the privacy of the neighborhood. He added stated he had met all the City requirements. Commissioner Allen asked the applicant's representative, Rick Morse, in reference to the photos provided if the back structure of the property was owned by the business or would the same owner's occupy both the front and back property. Commissioner Ceseña asked how far the setback from the property line was proposed to be. Rick Morse, applicant's representative, stated the setback was determined by the City's required setbacks standard and he did not have a copy of the drawings to show where the exact location of the property lines were. Community Development Director Molina stated the setback would be approximately 20' to 21' and that the owner would live on the front property. No further public comment given in favor or opposition, Chairman Comstock closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m. Commissioner Allen stated everyone who is opposed to the project needed to understand that sometimes compromise is the solution. Through his past experience with the Lions Community Club, which was opposed by residents, everyone compromised and now many residents are glad that we have the Grand Terrace Lions Club in the City of Grand Terrace. Chairman Comstock suggested landscape measures be used as a privacy shield for the Community Development Director Molina responded that staff had not required any landscape screening but could implement it in the conditions. Assistant City Attorney Tsai, advised the audience that the public comment section was closed and now was the time for the Planning Commission to deliberate, as there was Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) rebuttal in the audience while the Commissioners were speaking. Commissioner Ceseña stated that she liked the idea of shielding the home for the y but not sure about the trees that would be used. Commissioner Allen stated both the public and applicant had good arguments and he would like to see property values increase in the City. Commissioner Ceseña stated she would like to see a row of trees rather than a wall City of Grand Terrace Page 6 Packet Pg. 8 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 much more aesthetic look. Commissioner Allen commented that the easement looked concerning. Chairman Comstock stated the property owner had property rights and met the City's requirements. Chairman Comstock would like to keep the peace between new residents and the neighbors and stated the easement conveyance would be recorded. He recommended a condition be added for an adequate landscape plan to be drafted to work as much as possible as a privacy shield to prevent looking into the surrounding neighbor's yards. Mr. Morse stated the concern is that the landscaping needs to be convenient for the owners and would rather alter the architecture. He would need to discuss with the property owner and cross-reference with the City. Chairman Comstock motioned the item to be continued to revise the architectural features along the rear of the residence and revise the landscape plan to incorporate trees along the property line. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2015-___, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 14-07 TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF VIVIENDA AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET WEST OF BURNS AVENUE (APN 0275-282-20) RESULT: CONTINUED Next: 5/7/2015 6:30 PM C.INFORMATION TO COMMISSIONERS None Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) D.INFORMATION FROM COMMISSIONERS Chairman Comstock commented on the effects the landscaping would have with the new water restrictions that will be implemented by the state and asked staff to provide Grand Terrace residents with water conservation tips through an informational website for water conservation and landscaping alternatives. Commissioner Allen also agreed with Chairman Comstock informational website idea. Community Development Director Molina stated she would be attending a meeting with City of Grand Terrace Page 7 Packet Pg. 9 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 Riverside Highland Water Company and could provide the Planning Commission with a report regarding water conservation tips for residents at the next Planning Commission meeting. Director Molina agreed with the Commissioners and stated linking a web site the City's main website. Commissioner Ceseña provided information regarding the Grand Terrace Gardening Club currently active on social media. The clubs provides supplies to Grand Terrace citizens such as gardening tools and plants. Commissioner Ceseña stated clubs such as these can be helpful in water conservation. Commissioner Allen invited the public to join the City of Grand Terrace clean-up day on Saturday, April the 18, 2015, and to meet at the Lions Community Center at 8:00 a.m. Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) City of Grand Terrace Page 8 Packet Pg. 10 A.1 MinutesGrand Terrace Planning CommissionApril 16, 2015 ADJOURN Chairman Comstock adjourned the meeting at 7:56 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Board/Planning Commission to be held on May 7, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. _________________________________ _________________________________ Tom Comstock Sandra Molina Chairman of the Grand Terrace Planning Community Development Director Commission Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 16, 2015 6:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) City of Grand Terrace Page 9 Packet Pg. 11 B.2 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE:September 3, 2015 TITLE:Site and Architectural Review 15-03 and Environmental 15- 05 Located at 22247 Pico Street PRESENTED BY:Sandra Molina, Community Development Director RECOMMENDATION:1) Conduct a public hearing, and 2) Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2015-__, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 15-03 TO CONSTRUCT 12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON 12 APPROVED LOTS LOCATED AT 22247 PICO STREET PROPOSAL: Darryl Moore, representing Kenneth J. Catanzarite, has submitted Site and Architectural Review 15-03 and Environmental 15-05 requesting approval of the site and architectural concepts to construct 12 residential units on previously approved Tentative Tract Map 15-01(TTM 18793) Each residence is proposed on a lot measuring a minimum of 7,200 square feet. The housing product is a mixture of single and two-story homes and house sizes vary between 1,750 square feet to 2,286 square feet. BACKGROUND: On April 16, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map 15-01 to create the 12 residential units upon which development is proposed. On April 28, 2015, the City Council approved the Tentative Tract Map 15-01 to create the 12-lot subdivision. Pursuant to the City's Zoning Code, all single family residential homes are subject to Site and Architectural Review by the Planning Commission, which is why this item is before the Commission. Additionally,the tentative map has been submitted for final map review and is undergoing plan check. Once the map is accepted by the City Council and recorded, each lot can be developed with a single family home, subject to the iew and approval. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The parcel is triangularly shaped and relatively flat; it gradually slopes from east to west. It fronts along Pico Street at its north boundary. Pico Street is a 66-foot wide collector street. Along Pico Street the parcel measures 460 feet wide and narrows to about 10 feet wide at its south boundary. The site contains a residence and fire damaged barn Packet Pg. 12 B.2 structure, both of which are proposed to be demolished. To the east of the site is the Gage Canal, and to the north, south and west are single family residential uses with the same R.17.2 zoning designation. ANALYSIS: General Plan/Zoning Consistency The Project site is designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the General Plan Land Use Map. The LDR designation limits land uses to single family detached residential units at a density of 0-5 dwelling units per acre. Project density is 3.75 dwelling units per acre. The site is zoned R1-7.2 Single Family, which allows one single family residence on a lot. This zone district requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Each lot measures a minimum of 7,200 square feet. On each lot, one single family home is proposed, consistent with the zoning code. Status of the Tentative Tract Map The tentative tract map is approved, and the developer has submitted the final map for review. The final map includes the grading, retaining wall, public improvement plans (street, utilities, water, sewer, street lights, etc.), and a subdivision improvement agreement. Once these items are accepted by the City Council, the map can be recorded and the lots are legally created. However, since at this time there is only one lot, building permits cannot be issued to construct the houses. A condition of approval is recommended to be placed on the project indicating the final map must be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Site Plan: The site plan is a very simple plotting of the approved tentative tract map with each proposed residence shown on each lot. The homes that will be built are an even mix of single and two story homes. The site plan delineates the setbacks for each lot and demonstrates that each home meets the approved structural setbacks. Additionally, each home meets the required height, lot coverage, and parking requirements. As seen on the site plan, Lot 12 is a flag lot and the house will not be visible from the street. For identification purposes, a condition has been added requiring the address of the residence to be installed along the street frontage so that it is clearly visible from the street. Floor and Architectural Plans: There are five housing plans proposed. Each house will have a covered entry porch, and an attached two- or three-car garage. Plans 1, 2, 3 and 5 have an option for an additional bedroom. The Table below is a simple breakdown of the standard floor plans. Packet Pg. 13 B.2 Proposed Floor Plans Plan Lot Square Stories BR/Baths Garage feet th 1A 12 1,750 Single 3/2.5 4 bedroom 2-car option th 2A, 2B 11,10 1,750 Single 3/2.5 4 bedroom 3-car option th 3A, 3AR, 3B 2, 3, 5 1,776 Single 3/2.5 4 bedroom 2-car option 4A, 4AR, 4B 1, 6-9 2,080 Two 5/3 2-car th 5A 4 2,286 Two 4/3 5 bedroom 3-car option Architectural Plans: There are five color and material schemes corresponding with each Plan. The colors and materials are complementary to the surrounding area. Each Plan will include a tiled roof and will have either an architectural stone or contrasting stucco color treatment. Accent colors will be used on entry and garage doors, eaves, and window/door border treatments. The proposed color and materials board are attached to the report. Conceptual Landscape Plan: The applicant will be installing front yard landscaping on each lot, and on the street side yard of Lot 12. The conceptual landscape plan demonstrates adequate front yard landscaping. In keeping with efficient water use, the applicant is proposing to install artificial turf. However, given the small amount of artificial turf area, and the desire for natural turf, staff would allow natural turf in the front yard areas only. Side yards would need to be artificial turf, or planter area planted with shrubs and ground cover. Additionally, a final landscape and irrigation plan demonstrating compliance with the ired. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Project, to construct 12 single family homes on the each tentatively approved lot, is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act, Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, which exempts infill development when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, is devoid of habitat for biological resources, is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. A Notice of Exemption has been included for adoption. PUBLIC NOTICE: Packet Pg. 14 B.2 Public notice of the Project was provided, including publishing in the Grand Terrace City News and mailing notices to property owners within 300 feet of the Project site, 10 days prior to the meeting date. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted in three public places. To date, City staff has not received any comments regarding the proposed Project. CONCLUSION: The proposed Project is consistent with the Zoning Code and General Plan, and conforms to the plotting of the tentative map. The construction of the 12 residences, and landscaped front yards with water efficient plant material will complement and enhance the surrounding area, and staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution approving the Project. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (DOC) BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (DOC) Notice of Exemption_SA 15-03 (DOC) Color and Materials (PDF) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 08/26/2015 2:18 PM City Attorney Completed 08/26/2015 7:19 PM Community Development Completed 08/27/2015 9:54 AM Planning Commission Pending 09/03/2015 6:30 PM Packet Pg. 15 B.2.a RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 15-03 TO CONSTRUCT 12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18793 LOCATED AT 22247 PICO STREET (APN 1167-292-01) WHEREAS, has filed applications for Site and Architectural Review 15-03 and Environmental 15-05 for approval of the site, architectural, and landscape concepts for 12 single family homes to be constructed on previously approved Tentative Tract Map No. 18793 ( WHEREAS, the Project site is zoned R1-7.2 Single Family and designated Low Density Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map, located 22247 Pico Street, 1167-292-01. WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for an environmental exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, it is devoid of habitat for biological resources, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. WHEREAS, on September 3, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California and concluded the hearing on said WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332. The Notice of Exemption prepared in connection with the Project has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and is hereby adopted. Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) 2. The Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to Architectural and Site Review 15-03: a. The Project is consistent with the intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 16 B.2.a Code and the General Plan. The proposed Project to construct 12 single family residences is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General plan in that it meets the standards of the R1-7.2 zoning -Density Residential category. b. The location and configuration of all structures associated with this Project are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures, that they do not interfere with the neighbors' privacy, that they do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The design of the proposed single family residences is complementary with existing residential development in the City and surrounding area. All front yard areas will be appropriately landscape with water efficient plant material. c. The architectural design of structures, their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the surrounding development, natural landforms, are functional for the Project and are consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The proposed residences will have a stucco finish with contrasting accent colors. Colors will be earth tone, and the design is complementary to surrounding properties. d. The plan for landscaping and open spaces provide a functional and visually pleasing setting for the structures on this site and is harmonious with the natural landscape of the area and nearby developments. The front yard of each residence will be landscaped with trees, shrubs, groundcover and will be visually pleasing to the surrounding area and streetscape. e. There is no indiscriminate clearing of property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive and unsightly grading of hillsides, thus the natural beauty of the City, its setting, and natural landforms are preserved. Trees and vegetation have been removed in accordance with the approved tentative tract map. However, front yard areas will be landscaped. f. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval. Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Site and Architectural Review 15-03 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Site and Architectural Review 15-03 is approved to construct 12 single family homes within the boundaries of previously approved Tentative Tract Map No. Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 17 B.2.a 18793, including front and side yard landscaping. Each residence is proposed on a lot measuring a minimum of 7,200 square feet. The housing product is a mixture of single and two-story homes and house sizes vary between 1,750 square feet to 2,286 square feet. This approval is based on the application and materials submitted on July 13, 2105, including the site, floor, architectural and conceptual landscape plans; and color schemes 1 through 5 dated July 13, 2015. These plans are approved as submitted and conditioned herein, and shall not be further altered except as modified by these conditions of approval, and unless reviewed and approved by the affected city departments. 2. This approval shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of adoption of this resolution unless the use has been inaugurated or a time extension has been granted by the City, in accordance with Chapter 18.63 of the Zoning Code. Time extensions shall be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand Terrace and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Grand Terrace concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the Planning Commission, or Community Development Director. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 4. The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, floor plans, wall plans, building elevations, and landscape plans except as modified by these conditions of approval. 5. In the event that exhibits and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. 6. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees, and demonstrate the payment of school impact fees to the Building and Safety Department. 7. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply Terrace Municipal Code. Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) 8. All contractors shall acquire a valid City business license and be in compliance with all City codes Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 18 B.2.a 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, Tentative Tract Map 18793 must be recorded and a conforming copy delivered to the Building and Safety Division. 10. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City of Grand Terrace Building and Safety/Public Works Division, including the conditions of approval July 22, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department, including review of the residential construction plans. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and clearances from Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWCO). 13. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the project boundaries, or obtain abandonment of said easements from the affected easement holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned. 14. Air conditioning, heating and cooling units shall be ground mounted. 15. The location of all building-mounted light fixtures shall be shown on the elevations. A detail of said fixtures shall be shown on the elevations, and fixtures shall be decorative and complementary to the building architecture. Lighting shall not glare onto adjoining properties and may need to be shielded. 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the arch window and door trim pieces. 17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall three (3) copies of the final landscape and irrigation plan to the Community Development/Planning Department for review and approval. The plans shall be prepared in conformance of the adopted Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, as modified by the State of California Model Ordinance. The plans shall include the following: a. Incorporate parkway trees in accordance with Chapter 12.10 Parkway Trees; b. Revise the plan to show curb, sidewalk and landscape parkway along Pico Street; Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) c. Ensure that proposed plant material, at maturity, will maintain clear line visibility at all intersections; d. Plant material adheres to spacing recommendations based on plant and shrub species; and Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 19 B.2.a e. Note the material that will placed in planter areas, i.e. mulch, decorative rock, etc. 18. Natural turf may be incorporated into the front yard landscaping provided it does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance. All side yard areas shall not have natural turf area. 19. Revise the site and landscaping plans to show boundary fencing that matches the approved tentative tract map fencing. 20. Provide a detail for interior fencing. 21. The applicant shall install an address sign for Lot 12 that is clearly visible from the street. 22. The applicant shall submit a utility plan with the final construction plans that depict the locations of utilities necessary to serve the residences. 23. All exposed retaining walls and perimeter walls shall be decorative as shown on the approved site plan. 24. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any perimeter walls on shared property lines, the applicant shall submit an Encroachment Agreement signed by adjacent property owners authorizing construction of block walls on the shared property line. 25. The applicant shall be responsible for regular and ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the property, including weeds and debris, and all on-site and parkway landscaping shall be maintained by the applicant in good condition at all times. 26. All on-site utilities shall be placed underground, as determined by the Public Works Director. All frontage utilities shall be placed underground, as feasible, in coordination with the utility companies. 27. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division for a final inspection a minimum one week prior to the inspection date requested. 28. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the and content shall be prepared by the Community Development Department. Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, rd California, at a special meeting held on the 3 day of September, 2015. Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 20 B.2.a AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________ Pat Jacquez-Nares Tom Comstock City Clerk Chairman Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 21 B.2.b Building and Safety Division Conditions of Approval Date: July 22, 2015 Applicant: Darryl E. Moore Address of Applicant: 22365 Barton Road, Suite 200 Site Location: 22247 Pico Street, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 APN: 1167-291-02-0000 Project: TTM 15-01, (TTM No. 18793) and 12 unit Detached SFD Provide four (4) sets of construction plans and documentation for plan review of the proposed project. Below you will find a list of the plans and documents Building and Safety will need for plan review. The initial plan review will take approximately two weeks on most projects. Provide the following sets of plans and documents. . (4) Architectural Plans (4) Structural Plans (2) Structural Calculations (4) Plot/Site Plans (4) Electrical Plans (4) Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4) Mechanical Plans (4) Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations Building & Safety General Information Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, and the 2013 California Electrical Code, 2013 Residential Code and the 2013 California Green Buildings Standards adopted by the State of California. Packet Pg. 22 B.2.b Page 2 of 6 The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests can be made twenty four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 430-2250. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Temporary toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers. The toilet facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer type shall conform to ANSI ZA.3. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety and the Planning Department. (A) Installation of a construction trailer, or, (B) Security fenced area where the electrical power will be located. Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. The City enforces the State of California provisions of the California Building Code disabled access requirements. The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards may differ in some cases from the California State requirements, therefore accordingly. Pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code Section 6737, most projects are required to be designed by a California Licensed Architect or Engineer. The project owner or developer should review the section of the California Codes and comply with the regulation. Building & Safety Conditions Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay all Development the City; this also includes school fees and outside agency fees such as sewer, water and utilities. Copies of receipts shall be provided to Building & Safety prior to permit issuance. Packet Pg. 23 B.2.b Page 3 of 6 2. All on site utilities shall be underground to the new proposed structure unless prior approval has been obtained by the utility company or the City. 3. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, on site water service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency. On site fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the fire hydrants are established and approved. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, site grading certification and pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevation and set backs of the structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structure is in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. The certifications are required to be signed by the engineer of record. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. 6. Special inspectors and structural observation inspectors that are required by the engineer of record shall register with the Grand Terrace Building & Safety Division. The special inspectors shall provide a copy of his or her certifications and a cop project. Special inspectors are to provide daily reports to Building & Safety by e- mail to the City inspector and to the permit technician. Special inspectors are also required to provide a hard copy of the reports in the construction office daily for the inspectors use. The special inspectors shall make all necessary and required inspections before the City provides periodic inspections. 7. Prior to any permits being issued, the applicant shall enter into a recycling agreement for construction waste according to Ordinance No. 243. A deposit will be required as part of this ordinance. Recycling receipts from the recycled company responsible for accepting the materials shall be kept in the construction office for viewing by the City Inspector. Burrtec Waste Industries has a Franchise Agreement with the City to recycle waste. Waste from the project will need to be disposed at a Burrtec Waste Industries facility. No waste shall be disposed of at any other waste facility. If waste is disposed of at an unapproved facility, funds from the deposit will be used to offset the waste stream. 8. A demolition permit will be required to remove the existing structures on the land. Prior to the demolition permit being issued, the applicant shall provide Building & Safety with a Lead Paint Certification as well as an Asbestos Report and Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Certification. Packet Pg. 24 B.2.b Page 4 of 6 Public Works Plans required for first plan review Provide the following sets of plans and documents for review: (2) Tentative Tract Map Plans. (2) Street Improvement P (2) Title report showing all easements on the property. (2) Rough and Precise Grading Plans. (2) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) and Erosion Control Plan. (2) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. (2) Sewer Plans (2) Water Design Plans approved by the Fire Department and RHWC. (2) Approved alteration plan from Riverside City Gage Canal. (1) Copy of Construction Encroachment Permit from Riverside City Gage Canal. Public Works Conditions 1. A final Water Quality Control Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for engineering review and approval prior to any permits being issued. 2. All proposed public street improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed pursuant to the Business and Professions Code. All public works improvements shall be constructed to the San Bernardino County Standards and specifications. 3. Provide right of way dedication on Pico Street the entire length of the property and provide paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping and repave to a half width street improvement. Street improvements will be required to extend beyond the frontage of the project to blend the street flows for drainage and traffic. 4. cross gutter, ramps, sidewalk, street lights, signage and stripping. 5. and Pico Street shall be constructed per San Bernardino County Standard 110. The radius of these curb returns shall be 30 feet. 6. Maximum driveway grades shall be consistent with San Bernardino County Standard 131. Riverside County Standard driveway approach can also be used. Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) This driveway approach will allow for the disabled access to be installed in the reduced street width design as long as the SFD lots are elevated above the street. Packet Pg. 25 B.2.b Page 5 of 6 7. Street cut permits on Pico Street are required before work begins in the public right of way. A street cut deposit shall be paid to the City for each utility. The street cut deposit will be held by the City for two years after the street has been accepted. 8. A haul permit shall be required if more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City streets. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, and /or street cleaning may be required by the City engineer. 9. The geotechnical report recommendations for on and off site over-excavation, compaction, slope stability and paving sections shall be placed on the title sheets of the rough and precise grading plans along with the seal and signature of the geotechnical engineer. 10. The applicant shall improve the area beyond the block perimeter wall adjacent to the Riverside Gage Canal to the satisfaction of the Riverside Gage Canal by providing drainage next to the wall that will direct canal surface flows to an approved location. 11. Prior to the final tract map approval, there shall be filled with the City a statement from Riverside Highland Water Company that the project is in compliance with the Fire Department fire flow requirements. 12. A final tract map prepared by a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land survey, or a licensed land surveyor, must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the San Bernardino County Recorder. The final map shall comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 13. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final parcel map is released for filling by the County Recorder. 14. Survey monuments shall be set prior to map recordation or post a bond for the same. 15. Monumentation- If any activity on this project will disturb any land survey monuments, the disturbed monumentation shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying prior to commencement of any activity with the potential to disturb the monumentation, and a corner record or record of survey of the references shall be filed with the County. 16. Prior to final map being approved by the City Council, the applicant shall submit an Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) estimate for the off-site improvements to the Public Works Director. The Director will estimate a bond amount based on the estimate from the engineer of record. Ten (10) percent of the bond amount will be required in cash payable to the City of Grand Terrace. Packet Pg. 26 B.2.b Page 6 of 6 17. Prior to grading permit and public works permit issuance, the tentative tract map tract map Mylar shall be provided to the Public Works Department. 18. A Storm Water Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be required for this project pursuant to the State Construction General Permit. The owner will be responsible for submitting the necessary documents to the SMART system and obtaining a WDID # prior to any grading permits being issued. Attachment: BS Conditions_ Pico Subdivision TTM 15-01 18793 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 27 B.2.c CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Community Development County of San Bernardino Department nd 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2 Floor City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Project Title: Site and Architectural Review 15-03 and Environmental 15-05 Project Location Specific: The project is located at 22247 Pico Street in the County of San Bernardino, APN: 0275-282-14 Description of Project: Construct 12 single family residences and front yard landscaping within the boundaries of Tentative Tract Map 18793, a 12 lot subdivision. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Grand Terrace Planning Commission Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: Mr. Darryl E. Moore Exempt Status: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15332, Infill Development Projects Reasons Why Project is Exempt: Section 15332, This section exempts infill projects when the project is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Code, is on less than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, it is devoid of habitat for biological resources, the site is served by public utilities and services, and there are no impacts to traffic noise, air quality or water quality. Lead Agency or Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone (909) 824-6621 ______________________________ _________________ Attachment: Notice of Exemption_SA 15-03 (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Sandra Molina Date Community Development Director C:\\users\\jlambarena\\appdata\\local\\temp\\minutetraq\\grandterracecityca@grandterracecityca.iqm2.com\\work\\attachments\\2912.doc 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600 Packet Pg. 28 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 29 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 30 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 31 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 32 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 33 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 34 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 35 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 36 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 37 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 38 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 39 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 40 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 41 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 42 B.2.d Attachment: Color and Materials (1760 : Site and Architectural Review 15-03) Packet Pg. 43