The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-17 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TPM-90-03, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13664) AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (E-90-09) WHEREAS, the Applicant, L.A. Wainscott and Associates/Property Owners James Brian Harber and Robert Womack Harber, have applied for approval of TPM-90-03 (Exhibit A), a tentative parcel map 13664, subdividing 8.7 acres into 5 lots in Phase I, in the Commercial Manufacturing Zone located on Van Buren Avenue(APN#277-091-63/64);and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration(E-90-09)has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May 16, 1991, regarding this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council of TPM-90-03 and its associated Negative Declaration (E-90-09) subject to the conditions contained herein; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 13, 1991, regarding this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings are made in relation to TPM-90-03 and E-90- 09: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 3. That the design of the subdivision (Phase I) and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 4. That the design of the subdivision (Phase I) or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration; 5. That the proposed subdivision (Phase I) together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the proposed subdivision(Phase I),its design and density conform to the conditions imposed by this chapter,the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that TPM-90-03 (Exhibit A) and the aforementioned Negative Declaration (E-90-09 Exhibit B) are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. An overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board prior to issuance of building permits for any parcel within the Parcel Map. Such program shall include but not be limited to: * Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of commercial and office structures. * Location of buildable pads for each individual lot; and * Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements; and * Parking and access layout; and * Reciprocal access between individual parcels. 2. The approval of this parcel map is for the proposed subdivision, Phase I, illustrated on the map. This does not represent current or future approval of the referenced proposed remainder parcel, Phase H. In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, the remainder parcel shall require the filing of a tentative parcel map. An additional overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board for the development of the remainder parcel, Phase H. 3. All recommendations from the City Engineer/Building and Safety Department in their memorandum to the City dated April 29, 1991 (Exhibit Q. 4. All recommendations from the San Bernardino County, Fire Warden's Department,in their memorandum to the City dated May 8, 1991 (Exhibit D). 5. All recommendations from the Riverside Highland Water in their memorandum to the City dated May 7, 1991 (Exhibit E). 6. All recommendations from the San Bernardino County Office of Specific Districts in their memorandum to the City dated May 6, 1991 (Exhibit F). 7. All recommendations from the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District in their memorandum to the City dated November 27, 1990 (Exhibit G). 8. All recommendations from the State of California Department of Transportation in their memorandum to the City dated November 27, 1990 (Exhibit H). 9. All recommendations from the City of Riverside,Public Utilities Department, in their memorandum to the City dated May 13, 1991 (Exhibit I). 10. The Commerce Way dedication shall be made as a condition of the parcel map as recommended by the City Engineer however the City shall enter into a deferral agreement with respect to the construction of Commerce Way improvements until such time as the remainder parcel develops or Commerce Way is developed, whichever occurs first, as recommended by the City Engineer. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 13th day of June, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy',City Clerk of the Itity of Ma r of the City of Grand Terrace and of the Gr d Terrace and of the City Council thereof. City Council thereof. I,Brenda Stanfill, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 13th day of June, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Carlstrom, Christianson and Hilkey; Mayor Pro Tem Grant ; Mayor Matteson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None , Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM J�A V 44 2��" - John Harper, City Attorney 1. SHEET 1 OF f ,f:. TEN TA T% VE 277-091-1J•5 I 277-091-23 I 277-091-2:s1 L J r 22 :Y` PARCEL MAP '1366-1 J�/� f: J�/� w the a rr ow GnAAv rEFmACE I A RES MU V/S/ON CP PARCEL MAP 96W AS RECCROEO/N BGOK /O6 PAGES AB 6 49 OP PARCEL MAPS, OF RECORDS OF 77L CoLNTY OF SAN BEAMVARMO, STATE OF CAL/FORMA \ L.A. WA/NSCOTT 6 ASSOCYA7PS INC. MAY/99/ \• 1�\` \ �� aeasARMOVROA0 7 \ \\ \\ w \ ORAMP MMAACr CALFCeerA P&Jtl r»4/e/4-/rra \ e-d) ue 3 113 -0 I91'O�S zcwin/a OWNER/SL/BD/V/Ok77 /• �•,; Jf/e7/hkS teMN4 •eN e woelwr aue.lulronR Aanr r�wwn QX/e.t2'C�/ \ \ I 6t//[�/hb'6t�T3•Lr� /mw vow a+Igi N A� inu �ulw.ueaw w MAV /J�� .• .F /'w 2o'tiv/�(.L�eM'�/�K �I EIVf:INEEA O KfMFAAF ( — ��eegr 7e7d.rA.(G 26L•Of(. L.A.WNA• rr E A3 A fW /^� rrr aur7ov low I� m.Pw 7EtTACf r — i \ •\�. C 1 "' LOT T i^)C'� !�-moo Guw.atalV 277-09J-51 �P -- /'. J\/j �J ,i,t"�iCu.AY _ ,P, i S•loM A - u77L,77ES LOT-1 /�� + \ ` n.aernc uulv►•iA mew co. J Jr�' ��^- gl- r AG.\ ,� nil C• .975 ' MAUD,C cn _ ��^1l 1 ant ro.uuw.ara/e (�, pp�� •S, -y �y� ctd "att VAI�N31'S.G[3P.II.YB — ;j� /y/oYl-�1 I L� MAP nlavn c �/ /. :� +� ixv l>Q/r,E)N�FOTIA ens CO. c-'JM I• / e J C� Irev vca.m w.xan 8 '': C� eexo.I Orr IW M-10 7LI.4ILT sz, auras rEr++�o,cww,a W- WAr RKabOl'MutAI.O WAf CO. T� I M••A E.WAa M/ / 'i:• / (\�/ carom,cAuw.oeael TrncnL saNLry qc s.e.m.s7a w+73w./m r a<.wlw lo. M4 RF aT. L I I iwK zr I� It 4' �mm Er. ' r p.lorrrl _ Y _ VAN BU/tEN Sr_ _ _ _ _�.�^__lYr/UL 9eq}aVrgf 9.O.ra sJn onAi.rM./aS a+n T N•T•s.c. ww'.- GAT �~ _ >_hT •'� Xt. LEGEf/p V/C/MrY MAP J\iJ F? J�iJ � 277-JOl'l --/�- �� euoi�wriv snueF ll• I emA/awr c/fw 277-JOJ-E O I 277-J OJ-BJ � T� I I•X/a7'!N9 COMMG.F/AL Cu.•//'tgC :.: /'/rAM'Af�T.iA�'I'eW.NIXTAQ7GV. W f�J Air(QE3!97J'd �� - fl:: 1 Planning +0 TERRtic Department NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TPM-90-03,a Tentative Tract Map 13664,and E-90-09(Environmental Review)subdividing 8.7 acres into 6 commercial lots for commercial and light industrial uses. This project is within the General Plans Commercial/Light Industrial Zone. APPLICANT: L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. Owner - Harber Companies/Brian Harber LOCATION: Van Buren Avenue APN# 277-091-63/64 Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to May 28, 1991. All comments should be directed to the Planning Departmewnt. Maria C. Muett, Date Acting Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace - EXHIBIT B. 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621 Planning 1D reRRti Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TPM-90-03,a Tentative Tract Map 13664,and E-90-09(Environmental Review)subdividing 8.7 acres into 6 commercial lots for commercial and light industrial uses. This project is within the General Plan's Commercial/Light Industrial Zone. APPLICANT: L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc. Owner - Harber Companies/Brian Harber LOCATION: Van Buren Avenue APN# 277-091-63/64 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Maria C. Muett Date Acting Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Background 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3. Date of Environmental Assessment: 4. Agency Requiring Assessment City .of Grand Terrace Ai05de775=NC. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 6. Location of Proposal: VA&-Agr Lrn' om vAN 8QP-ed APrv#a7-1-691-43, .277-091--0�� . 11 Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions. or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? x c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? J( ' e. Any substantial increase in. wind or water erosion of soils, either on or v or off site? I�, Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, . inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground Y failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: , a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture; or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes -in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage .patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow • of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of -surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Yes Maybe No g. Change in the quantity of .ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, -or through inter- ception of.an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the. amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or .property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? �( 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? )( b. Reduction of the numbers. of any unique, rare, or endangered -species of plants? c. Introduction of new -species -of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- meet of existing species? T d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Deterioration to existing fish or Wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No 6. Noise. . Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to .severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? �( b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk -of Upset. .Will the proposal involve: r— a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan,or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the -proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional Y vehicular movement? /\ _ Yes Maybe 'No b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X( c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, .or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? �- - c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational faci- lities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result -in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources ' of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes .Maybe No b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: - a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to -potential l/ health hazards? 1� 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to - public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal -result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site? �( b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? ' c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? - �� ME — _ Yes Maybe No d. Will the proposal restrict existing I religious or sacred uses within the ��% potential impact area? 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the -habitat of a fish or wildlife species, -cause a* fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten 'to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, -definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment \/ is significant..) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • ......._yam,_.._. ,. ._.. - ,._. c u"8 i mar C ,�a. LYLcr.—'i.'�S ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION !� On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT 'have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on'� the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Planning Director - ao-1 Date SignaturA For .City of Grand Terrace { J III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Lb, c 3.b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovering of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which will be reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department. 6. a The existing noise levels may increase as a result of the development of commercial/light industrial uses in an.area that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 7. The proposed project may produce new light or glare however this will be mitigated by directing the lighting away from any surrounding residential areas and compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Off-Street Parking Ordinance. 13.a,b,f The future development of this site into a commercial/light industrial u;se will result in the increase of additional vehicular movement and may result in the �1 demand for new parking. There may also be an increase-in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. These hazards will be mitigated within the conditions adopted for this project. Also, these impacts will be within the Traffic Circulation Element of the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. �1TY o W.O. 12-2.1074 Gliken TERR CE MEMORANDUM 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace TO: Maria Muett, Acting Community Development Director California 92324-5295 Civic Center FROM: Joseph Kicak, City Engineer (714)824-6621 DATE: April 29, 1991 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 13664 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. Byron R.Matteson 1 . Commerce Way Mayor (a) Dedicate to provide for 44 foot half street plus 10 feet. Hugh J. Grant Mayor Pro Tempore (b) Install curb and gutter 32 feet from street centerline on east side. ,Gene Carlstrom ,.on,,.---,,M.Christianson (c) Construct standard berm 10 feet west of centerline. Herman Hilkey Council Members (d) Construct standard roadway between new curb and the berm. Thomas J.Schwab 2. Van Buren Street City Manager (a) Install curb and gutter 20 feet from street centerline. (b) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. 3. Street "A" (a) Dedicate to provide for 64 feet of right-of-way along with standard cul-de-sac at north end. (b) Install curb and gutter at 20 feet from street centerline and` standard location along the cul-de-sac. (c) Construct standard roadway between new curbs. 4. Structural sections of all streets shall be designed to TI=8. 5. Construct standard sidewalk. 6. Install ornamental street lights. EXHIBIT C l Memorandum to Maria Muett April 29, 1991 Page 2 7. Provide hydrology study. 8. Construct adequate drainage facilities. 9. Install sanitary sewer to serve all lots. 10. Show proof of paying off the sewer assessment or reapportion any outstanding bond amounts. 11 . Provide will serve letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. 12. Provide Preliminary Soils and Geology Reports. 13. Grading shall be completed on all phases, in conjunction with Phase I, in accordance with Chapter 70 of the U.B.C. 14. Obtain storm run-off acceptance letter from property owners affected by development of this parcel . 15. Pay all permit, inspection fees and capital improvement fund fees in effect at the time of recording. 16. Coordinate with City of Riverside regarding the existing 42" diameter water line. Each sheet of plans having impact on this facility shall have provisions for approval by the City of Riverside as to protection of the 42" diameter line. 17. All improvements shall -be designed by owner's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City. JK/ct $All BE'cNARDrNO COUNTY E!rVjRQ,-re,FNTAL T, Fi � s` N i GROUP P7hCS i.,L E SSAGE - COVER SHED (71 4) 387-322 ) TnW 1 6- �-- TO: FROM; pEPARTVMFr � din. this age) 1 Number of pa�`aa (including p SPECIAL INSTRUCaavNS: rive, If you experience any problems in receiving thirp ;Information as contact the operator whose name is noted below: narL t'n 4g� atar ;�one w?CAR:APPLICATIONS :FAX.cOvr.,R.SIM,ET EXHIBIT D � S AND FIRE WARDENDEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BEIRN RDIN" Fire pzutact3on rianninZ c—Acss COV�mGnt Canaea OFFICE OF PUBM SAFF. r..' 385 Nr,. Atrawhand Avenue. F:ra# Floor , Sari 84rnardlno. GA 93415.0186 FLOYID TIDWELL 01rec%os 14) 3$7.A.212. 387-4213 - EMERGEN^,Y SERVICES f �`�- Date- � 'Z o E .1'he following circled conditions apply to your project. Fire Department Reference Number: ` � ' C) F-1 The above referenced project is protected by the San Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden Departirtent. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current Fire Protection requirements. ®r72 All now construction sh411 comply with the existing uniform Fire Code Requirements and all applicable statues, codes, ordinances, or standards of the Fire _1 Department, F-3 The street address shall be posted with a minirrtun of four (4) inch numbers, visible from the street and du:inq the hours of darkness the numberm shall be low voltage in".ernaliy elootrically illuminated. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street in accordance with the Vniform Fire Cade. Where building set backs exceed 100 feet from the roadway, additional contrasting four ( 4) inch numbers a: a17. be displayed at tho property access entrance. r-4 prior to final inspection or occupancy each chimney used in conjuactl= With any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained,witht- an approved spark arrester as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. F-5 Prior to any construction occurring, all fla=able vegetation shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. . F-6 Prior to final inspection or occupancy the development and each phase thereof shall have two ( 2) points of x vehicular access for fire and other emergency eauipment, and fax routes o escap* which wIll -.afely handle evacuatione aaa required in the development code. Fm7 pr�.or to final inspection or occupancy, private roadways which exceed one-hundred and fifty {150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within_ one hunde-ed and fifty ( 150) foot of, and shall give reazonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An accoas road shall be provided within fifty ( 50) feat of all buildings if the natural grade between the accese read and the building is in excess o¢ thirty percent (30) . where the access roadway- cannot be provided, an approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided, ate required and approved by the Fire Department. F-•4 Prior to finial inspection or occupancy a turn-around shall be provided at the end of .each roadway, one- hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be approved by the Fir® Department. Cul-de- sac Length shall not exceed six-hundred (600) feet except J' as identified in the dovelopment code and approved by the Chiefs F--9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation., or approval. Written daoumontation shall be submitted to the Fire Department having jurisdiction. Private fire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with minimum paving width of twenty (20) feet. F-lp water systems dvsiaa�ed to wiaet the required. fire flow F-010 of th4s development shall be approved by the Fire Department having jurisdiction. The developer shall furnish the Fire Departm®nt with two copieO of the water syete m improvement plan for approval and a letter from the water Purveygr stating the availability of the required fire flow prior to rocoxdation. Water systems shall be operational and approved by the Firq Ugpaxtment prior to any con4truction occurring. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San Resrnardino county "Guide f termination of ReSMired Fire Flow-". In areas without water-serving util t a e re protection water system shall be based on NFPA pamphlet. number 1231 and Uniform fir. Code requirements... , lhj F(Z>,.0 (�, A1600 _. (P 614 Sa S�. c -- r- - F-10 Mq-IL3 T�9VGk? IL5 Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow $hale. be Qpeyaticnal and approved by the Fire papartmeait prior to any construction occurring. The ro,Tuired fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the Sari Berna:dino County "Guide For, The Determination. of Required Fire Flow" . In areas with it water-scg,r�.ng uiilitie�s, or f ire protection water serving utilities, the fire protewtlan water system shall be based on M.F.P.A. Pamphlet Number 1231 and the San aernardiiro County Cade-Uniform Fire Prior to building permits being issued approved fire hydrants ald fix hydrant pavement mar? rs shall be nstialled. Fire hydrants shall be 6" diameter with a minimum one 4" and one 2 1/2" connection. The hydrant and fire hydrant markers shall be approved by Fire Department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be 300 feat with the exception of single family residential Which may be increased. to 600 feet maximum. F-.12 prjor to final inspection or occupancy this developme:-t skull comply with Fire safety overlay conditlors as ad.opied in County Ordinance Number 3341 . The development is located in rire Rg;view Area. F-13 FriQr to .issuance of a building permit a fuel modification zone in cormplI&Ace with county standards is required. , P-14 Prior to filial inspection or occupancy, an approved Aire Department koy box is required. If automatic 01cat4ic aecgrity gates are used an approved lock switch is required on each gate in lieu of the box. gueetions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Flaruning Section: County Government Center, 3a5 North Arrowhead, 15t J:100r. Man Bernardino, California, 92415-0166; or 0411 (714) 387-4225. Thank you for your cooperation. sincerely, DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief County Firs warden By ire Pr ctio fanning Officer ��.. 1450 Washington Street Colton, California 92324 • (714) 825-4128 T ; oa PPS May 7, 1991 MARIA C. MUETT Acting Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, cA 92324-5295 RE: Negative Declaration TPM-90-03, TTM 13664 Harbor Companies/Brian Harbor -"t Dear Ms. Muett, r _J Riverside Highland Water Company is concerned about section #16- Utilities Subsection C - Water. Until . such time that the San Bernardino Fire Marshall 's office can review the specific building designs and useages and makes a determination of required fire flows, Section #16 C should be marked MAYBE. The water requirements can certainly be mitigated by water main design and reservoir capacity. However, until the Fire Marshall has responded with required flows a water system cannot be designed and therefore, no street improvements should be considered. Thank You. Since r gene P. Mc eans General Manager c3`, EPM/kb MAY. 9 1991 r� EXHIBIT E qColton, Cal 1450 Vo`asharabtOn J .ec-1 iJ _ �q�tC�MyEwv��`I0 `f CCU v g A X T R A N S M I T A L TIME: DATE: m AY N, :�G �.�. C c '•l T` rr ,uJ r A; lr' .�iic"s - 1 F IT+CL'JDING THIS FORT'4: TOTAL IvUrtBER Off' PAG,.S, � d � A' `T'Pm 1 31. 1, 4- TYM - 11 IX �LETTER mRANSXI'I"3.'ED: Liz"SCRIPTION OF ., c�, r•z_�> J - UJ1-c- Q 1 �iJ�, /r C(�'-L i1 C��.-.cam 4,� -��- ��.- 11-10 �l i�-srr l-.J r- - �cs -• �/-�Gr - - r- �, n.241 : �. Pav1Go ✓'r4- ffSSrS j rpy TIME rt,HAN i SyLV'S'0: 11 •`_C':I4ti:� Yii�� %- T�OTr.: IF ALL PACES ARE VOT RFCEIVED OR THERE IS PLEASE CALL (714) 825-4126- THANK YOU. TC!TkL i;;0VNI 'Y 10F r.tiN nr;<pAPIc i -YVH�IUCE OF SPECIALDISTRICTS G ..it_ =�. r��r �tt3�`F e Et�1 fS tit r xF vN. 6 y'F r=:•;:. .�' � .4.:,: .1��`,��rx"��' '`4t- sk¢•..s.�aei,S��L~�� ,, � Mu�s_..�.�...�' s.�L.� �itth &trest 3sa Boenarditto,CA 92415-0450 6 1714) 387.59� "-i�j � � MARA 1��R�aoy G. KflS+�t+�tS:K Toioso of • (714) $87.696Fs /,fit;��1,\� �.ea:+�tfor peciri Diz ie �ticx �= €� � � for �pccf�i t7istrict8 May 6, 1991 Di?ati id R. Sawyer Com-Twanity Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terracer CA 92324-5295 p_e: yoUp FI6,E No. TPH-90-03t 2-90-09 cpinv"'ry SERVICE ILREA 70,t ImpRovEHENT uoNE Hr JzL6SESSKZNT DISTRICT No. I. ASSESSORI S: PARCEL N08o 27 7-091 63 AH"D 277--091-640 ASSESS1E2aT NOS. 21-060 Dear fir. Sawyer: our records indicate the above referenced project, as identified by Assessor's Parcel Nos. 277-091-€3 and 277-091- 64, lies within County Service Ares. 70_, litprovement Zone H, Assessment District No. 1. The assessment lien pursuant to the .improvement Bond Act of 1915 has been paid in gull during the 30-day cash collection period for these parcels. Therefore, no assessment apportionment or assessment payoff will be required, pursuant to this act, for the proposed project. For more information please contact Von. Wald at (714) 387-5829.. Very t 1 rours, fr' / 1 MARK VON WALD Start Analyst. Development ServiQes Division Office of Special Districts a:grntrrce.mk2f5 EXHIBIT. F. °90 Riverside-Corona y9 • Resource Conservation District � r m v 2023 CHICAGO AVENUE,B14 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92507 • PHONE(714)683-7691 �c�NSEM P�`O November 27, 1990 Dear David R Sawyer We acknowledge receipt or the Preparation or an Environmental Impact Report for TPN1-90-03, E-90-09 in- Riverside County, California that was addressed to the USDA-Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District on November 27, 1990for review and comment. We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and find that: 1 . There are no controversial items in the report within the realm or -.} the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities. a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or flooding within the project area. b. There is no Prime, State, Unique or Locally Important Farmland involved in the project area. c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or projects. 2 We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by your committee: We do have a concern with the amrxmt and type of foreign materials deposited one'site. For proper carpaction much of this material should be excavated. We see no proposed drainage systEM for runoff and would recmuend a systen be designed. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project.. Sincerely, STAl� MO= Vice-President EXHIBIT G STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _ DISTRICT 8, P_O. BOX 231 t SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 w c� TDD (714) 383-4609 November 27, 1990 08-SBd-215-1.312 Mr. David R. Sawyer Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 RE: Tentative Parcel Map 90-03, E-90-09 Dear Mr. Sawyer: We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request consideration of the following comments: o It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily traveled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible with this concern, may require special noise attenuation measures. Development of this property should include any necessary noise attenuation. o Cumulative impacts on the Iowa Avenue and Barton Road Interchanges should be investigated further and mitigation measures must be considered to reduce peak and off peak vehicle trips. If you have any questions, please contact Tony Calvillo at (714) 383-6285 or FAX (714) 383-4936. Very truly ypprs, HARVEY J. SAWYER Chief, Transportation Planning Branch B EXHIBIT H '_ZWftd&t CITY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 3900 Main Street . Riverside. California . 92522 May 13, 1991 BILL D.CARNAHAN Public Utilities Director City of Grand Terrace, Planning Dept. 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attn: Mr. David R. Sawyer, Community Development Director Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 13664 - Subdivision of Two Parcels on Van Buren Street(APN-277-091-63 & 64) Refer: Your File No. TPN-90-03, E-90-09 Dear Mr. Sawyer: We have reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map and Conceptual Grading Plan for the subject property. The City of - Riverside has an existing 42-inch water transmission main located within a 30-foot wide easement running North-South along the West property line of this development. We have the following comments/requirements: 1 . ) The exact horizontal and vertical location/alignment of the 42-inch waterline shall be verified by the developer. Coordinate potholing with Mr. Adrian Saint at 782-5428. 2. ) Submit grading, street improvement, storm drain, and any other utility plans for new Commerce Way for our review and approval to ensure adequate cover and clearances are maintained. 3. ) Adequate drainage protection facilities are required where the proposed 20-foot wide drainage easement crosses our 30-foot easement. .. 4. ) The Remainder Parcel should be a numbered parcel(s) for the development shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan. 5. ) Since the City of Riverside does not issue non- interference letters, an Easement Certificate for signature by the Director of Public Utilities of the City of Riverside is required on the Record Map. EXHIBIT I f Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 782-5304. Sincerely, Richard S. Dro Senior Engineer cc: Brian Simpson grdterr.ltr