Loading...
1989-15 1 RESOLUTION NO. 89-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY y OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TTM-88-3, AND APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Applicant, Sigland and Associates has applied for approval of a tentative tract map, (Exhibit A) dividing 1.9 acres into 5 lots located at 12394 Michigan Avenue (APN 277-091-06); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act. WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 7, 1988, regarding this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM-88-3 and its Negative Declaration to City Council; and i WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on August 24, 1989, regarding these matters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings are made in relation to TTM-88- 3: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration; 5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that: A. The Negative Declaration attached as Exhibit B is hereby approved; B. TTM-88-3 (Exhibit A) is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. An overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board. Such program shall include but not be limited to: a. Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of individual homes; . b. Location of buildable pads for each individual lot; and, C. Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements. 2. Appropriate CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. Said CC&Rs shall include the approved design program required in Condition No. 1 and shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; 3. All conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building & Safety in their Memorandum dated October 28, 1988, attached as Exhibit C; and 4. All the conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their Memorandum dated October 5, 1988, attached as Exhibit D. ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 1989. ATTEST: fd� ity Clerk o e City of May of the City of Grand Grand Terrace and of the Mat and of the City _ = City Council thereof. Council thereof. } \ I, JUANITA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Grand Terrace held on the 24th day of August, 1989, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Pfennighausen, Singley, Carlstrom; Mayor Matteson NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Grant ABSTAIN: None jity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John arper City Attorney �, T �'•' �� BYRON R.MATTESON .j y, Maya BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN 'rf?y4.; Mayor Pro Tom Council Member; R C HUGH J.GRANT ,,, +• "�;t DENNIS L.EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION THOMAS J.SCHWAB City Manager Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-88-3, a tentative tract map subdividing 1.9 acres into 7 single family lots. This property is located in the City's R-1 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Sigland and Associates LOCATION: 12394 Michigan Street (APN #277-091-06) Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824- 6621) . Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to November 28, 1988. All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development Director, City of Grand Terrace. David Sawyer, Date Community Develop ent Director City of Grand Terrace EXHIBIT B 997QR RARTnN RnAn • GRANn TFRRACE CA 92324-52M • CIVIC CENTER — (7141 R24-6621 BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor ` BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN ?; =iv�'1 Mayor Pro Tam c, > Council Members HUGH J.GRANT V p�yV. 1Z DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD 'A i THOMAS J. SCHWAB City Manager NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: TTM-88-3 , a tentative tract map subdividing 1. 9 acres into 7 single family lots. This property is located in the City' s R-1 zone and within the General Plan' s Low Density Residential landuse designation (see attached map) . r �tf APPLICANT: Sigland and Associates LOCATION: 12394 Michigan Street (APN #277-091-06) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached' Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. David Sawyer, Date Community Develop nt Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 82476621 r , CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I Background 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3, Date of Environmental Assessment: u. Agency• Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace 5. Name of Proposal , if applicable G. Location of Proposal : II Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth, Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions• or in ; changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compac•- tion or overcovering of the soil? c. Substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features? ►� d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e.• Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? V _.. Yes Maybe No _ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition 'or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? V g, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground / failure, or similar hazards? 2, Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? - c. Al-teration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? VII 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course *or direction of water movements, / in either marine or fresh waters? V b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount ,of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood .waters? d. Change in the amount of 'surface •water in any water body? V e. Discharge into surface waters,, or in any- alteration of surface water qual- ity, including , but- not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or - / ! turbidity? V f. Alteration of the direction or rate / of flow of ground waters? V • . . . (. � - . : 1. : .: . ;;:::. ..�.:� .:. Yes Maybe No g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct add!- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in : a. Change in the diversity of species, or number- of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of .plants? V c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native. vegetation , or in a -barrier to the normal replenish- / ment of existing species7 l/ d. Substantial reduction !n .'acreage of / any agricultural. crop? — V 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the .diversity'. of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals' including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects) ?; t� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? 1 c. Deterioration to existing fish or Vol,, wildlife habitat? I Yes Maybe No G. Noise. Will the proposal result In: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? — ✓ 0. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ✓ 1 9 . Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use / of any natural resources? l/ b. Substantial depletion of any. non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposai involve: a. A risk of an explosion or. the release: -of hazardous substances (including , but not- limited to; oil, pesticides, (fhemicals- or -radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b:: . Possible- interference with an emerg- • . ency response plan or- an emergency .evacuation' plan? ✓ 11 -Population. Will the proposal alter the ..: location ; distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing . Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing.? 13 . ' Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional / vehicular movement? �/ Yes Ma `b6. :.No.. b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or, demand for *new parking? . c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people / and/or goods? V e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor / vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? V 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of--the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. . Police protection? y.` c: Schools? 1/ d: Parks or other. recreational faci- lities? V11, e. Maintenance of public facilities, j including.-roads?. f. Other' governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal.;'result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development` of new sources ! of energy? 16, Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: r a. Power or natural gas? Yes I Maybe :.No. b. Communications systems? v c. Water? l/ d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water. drainage? l/ f. Solid waste and disposal? (/ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a, Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? b. Exposure of people .to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposa_I result in the obstruction of any scenic vista C or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically- 'offensive site open to / public. view? 19. Recreation•: . Will .tfie proposal result in an impact:upon'•.the° quality or quantity of.existing "recreational opportunities? 20.. Cultural* Resources.. a Will :the proposal relt in. the alteration - of.'or the -destruction of a'prehistoric or historic archaeo log ical..site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic 'building, structure, or object?-. . >� c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural / values? I/ i ' k: f y: es Maybe. -No: d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 'l . 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten - to eliminate a plant or animal or , .,eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? t/ b. . - Does the project have the potential to achieve..short-term, to the dis-- advantage of, long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts.'. ... - will. endure well -into the future:. ) c. ; Does .the project have impacts which: ' are* individually limited, but cumu- :. lative'ly -considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate :. resources. may be relatively small, ,but. where the effect of the: total of - thos'eimpacts` on the environment: / is: significant.. ) V d:;:.,•D.oes the:project have environmental,: effects which will cause substan- .' . tial adverse effects on human beings; / either directly' or indirectly? V t i` - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial . evaluation; I find that the proposed' project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be / prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this..case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.' I fired the proposed -project .MAI'i;have a significant effect on' the environment,..and:an .-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. David Sawyer Planning Director ate ignatur.e For City of Grand Terrace i i III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. b, 3 b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the over covering of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department. 6 . a The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the development of residential uses in an area that is currently vacant. This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 8 . The existing landuse will change from vacant land to single family residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan. STREET -� w --DE BERRY -- SCREE µ A.O /bo /.} V F, ,-, u i•/.Jo .I fscTf to •e 0 O PeetPet2• O�i I°..]Q ,b.L AC. O S9 S8 35 2 cc ®Ot O Q Poe 3 Ob co O , L r� � 214.63 IBC. 2.38 Ac. �� r b co JA i r O '03POO �y �r rD 2 9 -K y 6 .Lass o' 9 --MAVIS -i-TREE=T- - 0 r� O � W � � LT•a ,• � //Je 2.of AC. r �� . : C O co O2 " 3 O5 06` rl TC: W ; . T� 1r Hilo c.C7 t /i t! t/t, /r S I COW) 1.99 J y //L Z•. y. . .,. L,. '• 6 Slo b Doti a /,L, 2 T 09 / , O i IIrsI (9.27 AG.) r ( (9. 27 A .) 0 rI�r�1 :TLN ©�► ♦ "v 61 fi W ©1 (9 2 , I,Q ¢ io• T 12!2 . .72 AC. A(/L , 8.75 AC. N ,p ti. a p:gO 1.72 AC M/L 75 AC. M/L ® Zr° . .. ' Ko°L ',J3 „: t •52 AC. rL /�L6 H.LO f/ 7L ei / u 20 q 19 L L!jr �15 O 14 ? w r'•�/J /00 00 r7S ,O Cd� R t�LJ "[S c�cs c� t.Lt sr �• 7L/ - ~j STREET ` •— 1 VAM-BOREN--- - ��—�7--- iFRE BYRON R.MATTESON e:: ' �' .• Mayor j_ fi rg•* BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSE-N Mayor Pro Tem Council Members HUGH ' � DENN SJL.GRANT EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J.SCHWAB City anager T0: David Sawyer, Planning Director W.O. 12-1.1054 FROM: Joseph Kicak,.City Engineer DATE: October 28, 1988 SUBJECT: T.T.M. 13834 I have reviewed the T.T.M. 13834 as submitted on October 24, 1988 and recomiend following be considered as Conditions of Approval: Engineering Department. 1. Dedicate to provide for Mavis Court right-of-way in the following manner: (a) 55 feet wide from Michigan Street westerly to the beginning of horizontal curve, approximately 165 feet westerly of Michigan Street centerline. (b) Balance of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated to provide for a smooth horizontal transition to a point 10 feet northerly of the centerline of cul-de-sac with a minimum dedication of 40 feet of right-of-way and that portion of the cul-de-sac southerly of the northerly tract boundary. 2. Dedicate the right-of-way necessary to provide for 44 foot half street in Michigan Street along the frontage of subject tract. 3. Install curb and gutter: (a) 32 feet from street centerline in Michigan Street. (b) 18 feet from street centerline in Mavis Court. (c) Standard radius location in the cul-de-sac. 4. Construct standard berm on the northerly side of Mavis Court in the area . where dedication is 40 feet or less, balance of. Mavis Court curb and gutter will be required on the northerly side except for cul-de-sac area. EXHIBIT C 1)127or, aAPTr)N anen e [;RANR TFRRACE. CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER — (714) 824-6621 1 Memorandum David Sawyer October 28, 1988 Page 2 5. Construct standard roadway between new curbs or the new curb and berm on Mavis Court. 6. Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline on Michigan Street. 7. Construct standard sidewalk. 8. Install ornamental street lights. 9. Construct sanitary sewer to serve all parcels. 10. Construct storm drain facilities as required. 11. Provide easements for both sanitary sewer and storm drain•as maybe required. '12. Pay off any outstanding bonds for sanitary sewer construction with C.S.A. 70, Zone H,.A.D. , or-make the necessary arrangements to segregate the bond am ants to individual parcels. r' 13. All utilities shall be installed underground. 14. Water. system shall be designed by owner's Civil Engineer, submitted for approval to following agencies: (a) Riverside Highland Water Ccmpany. (b) S. B. County Envirorznental Health Services. (c) Fire Marshall. 15. All improvements shall be designed by owner's Civil'Engi.neer to the specifications of the City. Building and Safety Department: 1. Submit preliminary soils report. 2. Prepare grading plan and submit for review and approval. 3. Prepare erosion control plan to be implemented during grading. 4. All construction shall conform to various codes adopted by City of Grand Terrace. FORESTRY AND FIRE V. ARDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO� .: Fire Pro'ection Planning Services • County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 335 No. Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • .San Bernardino, CA 92415.0186 FLOYD TIDWELL, Director (714) 387.4212, 387.4213 /� _ jjji /��ire. EMERGENCY SERVICES I ilk I C' DATE OCTOBER 51 1988 ACT u • .,. :.t- TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REFERENCE NO: TPM 88-2 Planning Dept. APN: 277-09-06 FROM GLEN J. NE MOAN County Fire Warden, + SUBJBrT FIRE PROTDCTION REQUIREMENTS CHECKED BOXES WILL APPLY TO YOUR PROJ19CT ' I•XI Fl. The above referenced project is protected by the Forestry 3F001 & Fire Warden Dept. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the owner shall. contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements. IX� F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the F02 1985 Uniform Fire Code (Ordinance No. 106) , Development (bde, i Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California. IXI F3. The street address shall be posted .with a minimum of three (3) 5F003 inch numbers, visible from the street 'in accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street. IXI F4. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any 5F004- heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint- ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire +•. Code. �FF5. All flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building 05 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a -finished structure. I I F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points 1F006 of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Cbde. IXI F7. Private roadways which exceed one-hundred and fifty (150) in 1F007 length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one-hundred and fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (300) . Where `1' EXHIBIT D the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. �XI F8. A turn-around shall be required at the end of each roadway 150 08 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six-hundred (600) feet except as identified .in the Development abde. F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading 19 and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having jurisdiction. IXI F10. All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow 1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the installation' of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor. Water for fire protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be over and above the average daily consumption of water. The following are minimum requirements for your proposed development: A. System Standards *Fire Flow 1250 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure with •sprinklered building Duration 2 Hour/s Hydrant Spacing 660 Feet between hydrants *If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional construction information is received. B. Distribution System Mains 6 inch minimum Laterials 6 inch minimum Riser 6 inch minimum C. Fire Hydrants Nunbers 2 Total (public only) Type • 6 Inch w/ 1 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s with National Standard thread and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection Street Valve 6 Inch Gate Fll. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal- 1Fb11 . (2) culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow." 13F F12. In areas without water-serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and. Rural Fire Fighting". A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. IXI F13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department 13 . with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. The fire department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. F14. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino 3FO14 County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced. F15. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone shall be required. Req- li'015 uirements will be site specific to the project. The greenbelt/zone plan must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction prior to recordation of the final map. Maintenance of said greenbelts and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from the fire department. Qi tions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning Seczlon; County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernard- ino, California, 92415-0186; or call 714-387-4225. Thank you for your coopera- tion. Sincerely, BY NANCY BEST Fire Protection Planning Officer cc: Sigland & Associates Riverside-Highland Water Co. 3517 File The following are I I Non-Standard Conditions I I Clarifications I I Comments: - — (3)