1989-26 RESOLUTION NO. 8 9-2 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TTM-89-03 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14471) AND ITS
ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Emblem Development Corporation has applied for
approval of a tentative tract map, (Exhibit A) subdividing 4.85 acres into 17 single family
lots located at 22738 Pico Street (APN 277-181-03); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article
6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration
has been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council per the California
Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning
Commission on October 16, 1989, regarding this application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TTM-89-03 and
its associated negative declaration subject to the conditions contained herein; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on
November 9, 1989, regarding this application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings have been made:
1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development;
2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;
3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat;
4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not
likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from
a wildland conflagration;
5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and
improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the conditions
imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations
of the City of Grand Terrace;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Grand Terrace, California, that TTM-89-03 (Exhibit A) and the aforementioned
Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) are hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit each model of home for Site and Architectural
Review Board approval and each individual home shall be constructed
accordingly. Additionally, the existing residence which is scheduled to
remain shall also be subject to Site and Architectural Review. Subsequent
minor changes in design features may be approved by the Planning
Director.
2. The subject property shall be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and
Landscaping District.
3. The area containing the proposed rearyard slope in Lots 14 through 17 shall
be offered for dedication to the City for the purpose of inclusion in the
City's Lighting and Landscaping District.
4. If the area identified in Condition #3 is not included in the Lighting and
Landscaping District then a Home Owner's Association shall be established
and shall at a minimum be responsible for the maintenance of the rearyard
slopes of Lots 14 through 17 inaccordance with the property maintenance
standards of the City of Grand Terrace.
5. Each individual lot shall be provided an individual curbside mailbox.
Clustered gangboxes shall not be allowed.
6. All conditions as recommended by the Department of Engineering/Building
& Safety in their memorandums dated September 11, and September 25,
1989, attached as Exhibit C.
7. All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden
Department in their memorandum dated September 5, 1989, attached as
Exhibit D.
8. All conditions as recommended by the Colton Unified School District in
their memorandum dated September 1, 1989, attached as Exhibit E.
9. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside-Corona Resource
Conservation District in their memorandum dated October 24, 1989,
attached as Exhibit F.
10. A Will Serve Letter shall be obtained from the Riverside Highland Water
District.
11. The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern
California Edison easement.
12. The Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the existing Southern
California Gas Company Easement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a regular meeting held the 9th day of November, 1989.
ATTEST:
ity Clerk of t e ity of May of the City of Wrand
Grand Terrace and of the Terrace and of the City
City Council thereof. Council thereof.
I, JUANITA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the city of Grand Terrace held on the 9th day of November, 1989, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Singley, Carlstrom; Mayor Pro Tem Grant;
Mayor Matteson
NOES: Councilmember Pfennighausen
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
City Cler
APPROVED AS TO FORM
('�* 6aga 01
John Harper
City Attorney
c'rr ,
OE
JE� Planning
D
Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
TTM-89-03, a tentative tract map subdividing 4.85 acres into 17 single family lots. This
property is located in the City's R1-7.2 zone and within the General Plan's Low Density
Residential landuse designation (see attached map).
APPLICANT:
Emblem Development Corporation/Jerry and Susan Irby
LOCATION:
22738 Pico Street (APN# 277-181-03)
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect on the environment.
David Sawyer, Date
Community Develo ent Director
City of Grand Terrace
g EXHIBIT B
22795. Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
I Background
1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road , Grand Terrace, CA 9232Ll-5295
Attention : David Sawyer, Planning Director
3 . Date of Environmental Assessment:
4. Agency Requiring Assessment City of Grand Terrace
5 . Name of Proposal , if applicable
6. Location of Proposal : S-rV EE i
II Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in :
a. Unstable earth conditions- or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
c. Substantial change in topography or
ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction , covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e. Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils , either on or
or off site?
Yes Maybe No
f. Changes in 'deposition or erosion of
beach sands , or changes in siltati.on ,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or
the bed of the ocean or any bay, /
inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes , landslides , mudslides , ground
failure, or similar hazards?
2 . Air. Will the proposal result in :
a . Substantial air emissions or deterior-
ation of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture,
or temperature, or any change in /
climate, whether locally or regionally?
3 . Water. Will the proposal result in:
l
a . Substantial changes .in currents , or the
course or direction of water movements ,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Substantial changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns , or the rate and /
amount of surface runoff? J
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters , or in
any alteration of surface water qual-
ity, including , but not limited to,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
= 10,
Yes Maybe No
g . Change in the quantity of, ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals , or through inter-
ception of.. an aquifer by cuts or /
excavation$?
h . Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for —
public water supplies?
i . Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood- /
ing or tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in :
a , Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of plants
(including trees , shrubs ,. grass,
crops, and aquatic plants) ?
b . Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species /
of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area of native vegetation , or
in a barrier to the normal replenish- /
ment of existing species?
d. Substantial reduction .in acreage of
any agricultural crop?
5 . Animal Life. Will the proposal result in :
a . Change in the diversity of species , or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds , land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish , benthic /
organisms or insects) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
I
I I,
Yes Maybe No
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in : /
a. Increases in existing noise levels? J
b. Exposure of people to severe noise /
levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
substantial new light or glare?
Q. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
9 , Natural Resources . Will the proposal
result in :
a . Substantial increase in the rate of use /
of any natural resources? V/
b . Substantial depletion of any non- —
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including ,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides, .
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency /
evacuation plan?
11 . Population . Will the proposal alter the
location , distribution , density, or growth /
rate of the human population of an area? _ J
12. Housing . Will the proposal affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional /
housing? V
! 13 . Transportation/Circulation . Will the pro-
proposal result in :
a . Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
IZ
i
i
Yes Maybe No
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties., or demand for new parking? .
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people f
and/or goods? — V
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor /
vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians?
14 , Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon , or result in a need
for new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection? f
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational faci-
lities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities ,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15 . Energy. Will the proposal result in :
a. Use of. substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or re-
quire the development of new sources of energy?
16 . Utilities . Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities :
a. Power o'r natural gas?
Yes Maybe No
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal? V
17 . Human Health. Will the proposal result
in :
a . Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health) ? y
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18 . Aesthetics . Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to /
public view? ✓
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity /
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
a . Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or historic archaeo-
logical site? —
b. Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building , /
structure, or object?
' C. Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural /
values?
I �
Yes Maybe No
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the environ-
ment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species , cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels , threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history
or prehistory? J
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which oc-
curs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts /
will endure well into the future. )
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small , but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
I�
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on'
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
David Sawyer
Planning Mr-ector
ate Pnature
For City of Grand Terrace
' � 1
Ite
i
III. DISCUSSION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1. b, 3 b The development of this predominantly vacant site will result
in the over covering of a certain percentage of the soil. This
impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods
which reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering
Department.
6. a The existing noise levels will increase as a result of the
development of residential uses in an area that is
predominantly vacant. This impact will be within the allowable
levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the
General Plan and enforced through the City's Noise Ordinance.
8• The existing landuse will change from predominantly vacant
land to single family residential uses in accordance with the
adopted General Plan.
�7
W.O. 12-1 .1057
clrr
Cam` MEMORANDUM
RAND TER
TO: David Sawyer, Community Development Director
22795 Barton Road `
Grand Terrace FROM: Joseph Iticak, City Engineer J7
California 92324-5295
DATE: September 11, 1989
Civic Center
(714) 824-6621 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 14471
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval
for subject tract.
1. Pico Street
Byron R. Matteson
Mayor (a) Dedicate to provide for 33 foot half-street right-of-way.
HughJ. Grant (b) Install curb and gutter 22 feet from street centerline.
Mayor Pro Tempore
(c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street
Barbara Pfennighausen centerline (structural section to support TI=7) .
Jim Singley
2. Oriole Avenue
Gene Carlstrom
Council Members
(a) Dedicate to provide for 30 foot half-street right-of-way.
Thomas J. Schwab
City Manager (b) Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline.
(c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street
centerline (structural section to support TI=7) .
3. Street "A"
(a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way with
additional dedication. as may be required for standard knuckle
and cul-de-sac.
(b) Construct curb and gutter at 18 feet from street centerline
and in accordance with standard drawings for cul-de-sac and.
knuckle.
(c) Construct standard roadway between curbs (standard section to
support TI=7) .
4. Construct standard sidewalk along the frontages of all parcels.
5. Install ornamental street lights.
6. Provide adequate drainage facilities.
10J89
EXHIBIT C '
t Q
Memorandum to David Sawyer
September 11 , 1989
Page 2
7. Pay—off any existing bonds on said parcels or make necessary
arrangement for segregation of assessments through San Bernardino
County Special District.
8. Pay sewer frontage fees along the frontage of Pico Street.
9. Install sanitary sewer to serve all parcels.
10. All utilities shall be installed underground.
11. All driveways shall be constructed in accordance with the City
Standards.
12. Grading Plan shall be prepared for the proposed development,
showing all of the proposed retaining walls, horizontal, vertical
and structural details.
13. All improvements shall be designed by owner' s civil engineer to the
specifications of the City.
14. All of the improvements required above shall be installed or the
installation thereof shall be secured prior to the approval of the
final map.
-I
�Iry W.O. 12-1. 1057
RAND
TERRA
MEMORAN D U M
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace TO: David Sawyer, Community Development Director
California 92324-5295 /�
Civic Center FROM: Joseph Kicak, City Enginee>F--I�
(714) 824-6621 )))
DATE: September 25, 1989
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 14471 (89-3)
I reviewed the revised map as submitted.
Byron R. Matteson It appears that grading is proposed within the 30 foot wide SCE
Mayor easement.
HuC, Grant Such grading would be subject to approval of SCE.
Mayor Pro Tempore
Barbara Pfennighausen
Jim Singley
Gene Carlstrom
Council Members
Thomas J. Schwab
City Manager
:�.Li� .,
20
FORESTRY AND FIRE WARDEN DEPARTMEN-1 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Fire Protection Planning Services * County Government Center OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
385 No. Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor • San Bernardino, CA 92415-0186 FLOYD TIDWELL, Director
(714) 387-4212, 387-4213
10
EMERGENCY SERVICES
DATE SEPTEMBER 5, 1989 of:-
w, lu Oolu.
TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REFERMCE NO. TTM 89-03
Planning Dept. APN:
FROM DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief
County Fire Warden
SUBJBCT FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREV21U5
en
CHEC�1) BOXES WILL APPLY INJ YOUR PROJECT
1XI Fl. The above referenced project is protected by the Forestry Cry!!'! Hills
3F001 & Fire Warden Dept. Prior to construction occurring on any parcel the "A'2SLI.
owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire Niport
protection development requirements.
1XI F2. All new construction shall comply with applicable sections of the
5F002 1985 Uniform Fire Code (ordinance No. 106), Development Code,
Community Plans, and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
regarding fires and fire prevention adopted by the State of California.
1XI F3. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of three (3)
3 inch numbers, visible from the street in accordance with San Bernardino "alley
County Ordinance No. 2108, prior to occupancy. Posted numbers shall
contrast with their background and be visible and legible from the street.
1XI F4. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any
5F004 heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maint-
ained with an approved spark arrestor as identified in the Uniform Fire
Code.
1XI F5. All flammable xiegetation shall be removed from each building
3F005 site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building
material, including a finished structure.
F6. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points
1F006 of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for
routes of escape- which will safely handle evacuations as required in the
Development Code,.
1XI F7. Private roadways which exceed one-hundred and fifty (150) in ......
IF007 length shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction, arid
shall be extended to within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of and
shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of
the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided
within fifty (50) feet of all buildings is the natural grade between the
access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%) . Where
EXHIBIT D .
the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or
systems shall be provided as required and, approved by the fire department.
F8. A turn-around shall be required_ at the end of each roadway 150
1F008 feet or more in length and shall be approved by the fire department.
Cul-de-sac length shall -not exceed six hundred (600) feet except as
identified in the Development Code.
F9. Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading
1F009 and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval.
Written documentation shall be submitted to the fire agency having
jurisdiction.
1XI F10. All fire protection systems designed to meet the fire flow
1FO10 requirements specifide in the Conditions of Approval for this project
shall be approved by the fire agency having jurisdiction prior to the
installation of said systems. Said systems shall be installed and made
serviceable prior to recordation unless construction of said systems has
been bonded for a s required by the water purveyor. Water for fire
protection, as required by the fire agency having jurisdiction, shall be
in and operable prior to the start of building construction and shall be
over and above the average daily consumption of water. The following
are minimum requirements for your proposed development:
A. System Standards
Fire Flay 1250 GPM @20 psi Residual Pressure
with sprinklered building
Duration 2 Hour/s
Hydrant Spacing 600 Feet between hydrants
*If blank, flow to be determined by calculation when additional
construction information is received.
B. Distribution System
Mains 6 inch minimum
Laterials 6 inch minimum
Riser 6 inch minimum
C. Fire Hydrants
Numbers 3 Total
Type 6 Inch w/ 1 - 2 1/2 Inch outlet/s
with National Standard thread and
with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection
Street Valve 6 Inch Gate
1XI Fll. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate cal-
1FU11
(2)
culations, using the 1974 editin of the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
"Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow."
F12. In .areas without water-serving utilities, the fire protection
:3FUi2 water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet No. 1231, "Water Supplies for
Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting". A storage reservoir must be provided
for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined
by the fire department.
1XI F13. The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department
1F013 with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection
water systems are required. The fire department shall also sign all
water plans prior to recordation.
I F14. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino
3F014 County Ordinance No. 2475 shall be strictly enforced.
I I F15. A greenbelt or fuel. modification zone shall be required. Req7-
1F015 uirements will be site specific to the project. The greenbelt/zone plan
must be filed with and approved by the fire department with jurisdiction
prior to recordation of the final map. Maintenance of said greenbelts
and/or fuel modification zones shall be provided for with approval from
the fire department.
Questions and/or comments. may be directed to the Fire Protection Planning
Section; County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, lst Floor, San Bernard-
ino, California, 92415-0186; or call 714-387-4225. Thank you for your coopera-
sincerely,
BY NANC'Y BEST
Fire Protection Planning Inspector
cc: Riverside-Highland Water
Emblem
Batt 7
file
The following are Non-Standard Conditions I Clarifications Comments:
Z3
1 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
1212 Valencia Drive, Colton, California 92324-1798 (714)876-4227
RECT J E P v ) 1989
BOARD OF EDUCATION September 1 , 1989
MRS.DORTHA E.COOLEY Mr. David Sawyer
President Community Development Director
MRS.WENDY S.CURRAN City of Grand Terrace
Vice President 22795 Barton Road
MR.RAY ABRIL,JR. Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Clerk
MRS.RUTH 0.HARRIS SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 14471
MR.ARLIE R.HUBBARD
MRS.PATRICIA I.NIX Dear Mr.. Sawyer
MRS.PHYLLIS V.ZIMMERMAN The Colton Joint Unified School District As impacted at the
present time. As a result the school district assesses a fee of
$1 .56 per square foot on new residential construction.
ADMINISTRATION The fees are payable prior to issuance of building permits.
While the District remains concerned as to the affect of
MR.RUSSELLI.DICKINSON additional residential development on schools within Grand
Superintendent Terrace, the District has no objection to the project if the
MR.CHARLES H.JORDAN required assessment is met.
Assistant Superintendent,
Personnel Sincerely,
MR.ROBERT W.MURPHY
As
Assistant Superintendent,
Business
MISS NANCY A.NORTON Greg G. Gage
Assistant Superintendent,
Curriculum and Instruction Coordinator, School Facilities
MR.DANNY CARRASCO
Director,Administrative Services GGG:sl
MRS.BONNIE RUSSELL-HUNT
Director,Pupil Personnel Services
z� EXHIBIT E
Joining Together to Go the Extra Mile
v ta�vr ."
REC'p OCT 2 5 1989
Q�PS\0E-CpR0� Riverside-Corona
• Resource Conservation District
2023CHICAGOAVENUE, 614 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA92507 • PHONE(714)683-7691
9C
CpNSER�PS\O
10-24-89
Dear Mr . Sawyer
We acknowledge receipt of the Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report for TTM-89-03 22738 Pico SfrPP+
in Riverside County, California that was addressed to the USDA-Soil
Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation
District on 10-24-89 for review and comment.
We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report and find that:
1 . There ate no controversial items in the report within the realm of
the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities.
a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion
and/or flooding within the project area.
b. There is no Prime, State, Unique or Locally Important Farmland
involved in the project area.
c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs
or projects.
Q2 , We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by your
committee:
1 . Earth part e . any earth movement depending on time
of year will have an effect on erosion by wind and water .
It is flel:t a erosion control plan should be included in
the overall plan.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed
project.
Sincerely, I "'
2s. Stanley 7. Cooley
Directer EXHIBIT
YHIB 'T F
>nJ
Southern California Edison Company
P O BOX 4 10
100 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD
LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90BOI
WESTERN REGION ) TELEPHONE
LAND SERVICES D:,;SION 12731491.2946
Rf;AL FPJPERTIES AND ADMI N!STR aTIVE SERVICES �^ 'y FAX(213i 491•2675
SEC,D A I`V'il J — --—
Honorable City Council August 17 , 1989
City of - Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Council Members :
SUBJECT : Tentative Tract Map No . 1.4471.
Our review of the subject subdivision map reveals that the proposed
development will interfere with our rights within the subdivision
boundaries .
Until such time as arrangements have been made with the developer to
eliminate this interference, the development of the subdivision will
unreasonably interfere with the complete and free exercise of
Edison ' s rights .
If additional information is required in connection with the above
mentioned subject, please call Dennis Bazant at (213 ) 491-2644 .
Very truly yours ,
S . R. SHERMIDEN
Regional Manager
DENNIS . BAZAfN
Real Properties Agent
19921 (3 )pmh
cc : Irby, Langone & Associates
R . C . Warren/A. J. Lee
W. S . Franken
W. L . McClanahan
R . C . Schaefer
Area Manager
ATTACHMENT B
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA[�GqS COMPANY
1981 LUGONIA AVENUE, REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 3003, REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92373-0306
October 24 , 1989
City of Grand •Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace , California 92324-5295
SUBJECT : 22738 Pico Street
The division and development of the . property as shown on 22738
Pico Street will not unreasonably interfere with the free and
complete exercise of any easements held by Southern California
Gas Company within the boundaries of said project, providing we
are able to maintain our easements as recorded . This Company has
no objection to the recordation of said project, providing the
following conditions for construction over our easements are met:
1 . No change of grade without prior written approval
of Southern California Gas Company
2 . No permanent structures within the easements , i . e .
buildings , concrete pads, block walls , etc . Should
the Gas Company have to remove any temporary
structures over our easements , the re-installation
would be done at the property owner' s expense .
3 . . No planting of trees or deep rooted plants without
written approval from Southern California Gas
Company.
4 . No poles , signs, or fence posts to be installed without
written approval from Southern California Gas Company.
5 . Ingress and egress rights to and from the pipeline must
be maintained.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of this
Company' s rights , title and interest in and to said easements ,
nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the
provisions contained in said easement.
If you have any questions , please contact our Right of Way
Department at ( 714 ) 335-7733 .
Ken Soverns
Technical Supervisor
KS : mac
Enc . -Fight of Way Plat
I`9
27
ATTACHMENT C
SECTION TOWNSHIP MANGE
4 2S 4W S. f�
W
z
O D
`J j
4
ul
V �
r �
0
0
n P I C,O
m 's
So,L11-Lr-_ oc NEI�d. SW 114,Sr-�•4
TZ . cc,
��C3 13I 9-Ci0 S.F�.C.O.
JO ID
FEE, J Cp 21' KA. I IG S U h1 G• 1 p-I3 I I-I ��.1 J. T
ENc.; SEGUZI-r PL>1=1 �7IL N1A'TIO1-4AL. P,AP.Ik�- - T•
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
PUT ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION FOR PIPELINE RIGHT OF NAY. 13 IN WIDTH SCALE I,,—, IT
IN 0"1.,;-�� (•G2 TEQ2AGE�
DRWN. C CHKD.
DATE ��('�-
APPROVED: DRG.NO.P--I
/ OBTAINED
W.o.3: 1,4 4 a- ?
^/ 12G4-IC