Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.3 PC Presentation_Spring Hills Dentist Public Art ProposalCity of Grand Terrace Planning Commission/Site And Architectural Review Board Public Hearing for Amendment No. 1 to Site and Architectural Review 23-23 Environmental Review 24-04 Spring Hills Family Dentistry Public Art Project May 2, 2024 Background •The Applicant, Firestation Properties LLC, represented by David Lang, was approved on May 17, 2024, for the development of a ~12,000-square foot dental building. •The new dental office building is subject to the city's Art in Public Places program. Per conditions of approval, the applicant is required to submit a public art proposal for review and approval by the Planning Commission. •The applicant submitted a complete Art in Public Places Program proposal for PC consideration (SA 23-23 A01) The applicant proposes the installation of two steel donkey sculptures 1)Large sculpture being 10 feet high and 11.5 feet wide 2)Smaller sculpture being 6 feet high and 5.8 feet wide Location of Art Area Site Images West Property Line (View from Mount Vernon Ave.) Rendering Southwest Property Line (View from City Center Ct.) Rendering Artist 14 Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B) •General and Project specific conditions are required of the project as prescribed from Planning and Development Services. •The Art in Public Places art piece must be completed, installed, and inspected prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy of the building. Criteria For PC Review- Public Art Project 1.Conceptual compatibility of the design with the immediate environment of the site. 2.Appropriateness of the design to the function of the site 3.Compatibility of the design and location within a unified design character or historical character of the site. 4.Creation of an internal sense of order and a desirable environment for the general community by the design and location of the work of art. 5.Preservation and integration of natural features with the project. Criteria For PC Review- Public Art Project Cont. 6.Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence, and protection against theft, vandalism, weathering, excessive maintenance, and repair cost. 7.Representation of a broad variety of tastes within the community and the provision of a balanced inventory of art in public places to ensure a variety of style, design and media throughout the community that will be representative of the eclectic tastes of the community. 8.Works of arts and art places should be appropriate in scale, form, and content for the immediate, general, social, and physical environments with which they relate. Findings of Facts •Findings for Approval: Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 18.63 (Site and Architectural Review), in which Section 18.63.060 includes all the necessary findings. All necessary findings can be made and are provided as “EXHIBIT A” of Attachment 1 to this agenda report. Environmental Review 24-04 Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structure provides an exemption for projects that result in minor new construction or modification of existing structure. The instillation of public art at a scale proposed by this project is well below the scale of projects allowed under section 15303 and, therefore, this project is exempt from CEQA review. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse upon Project approval. Notification The Public Hearing Notice for the Project was published in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code and the City’s “Expanded Public Noticing and Outreach Policy for Public Hearings and Public Workshops.” Conclusion The Application / Proposed Project is consistent with: The Project is consistent with all necessary findings of facts. The Project meets all the criteria for review of public art projects. All required findings can be made and are provide in the staff report. Project shall comply with the Conditions of Approval Staff Recommendation Based on the findings and analysis in the staff report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission/Site and Architectural Review Board approve/adopt: Resolution Amendment No. 1 to Site and Architectural Review 23-23 Environmental 24-04 File the Notice of Exemption Thank you for your consideration. November 21, 2024 Planning Commission Public Hearing