04/13/2006 COPY..". .
0
I1UNDTetra ce April i3;2006
22795 Barton Road
b.
Grand Terrace'.'
California 92313-5295
i Civie'Center.
(909)824-G621' _
Tax(909)783-7629
rax'(909)783-2600
neat Fe,r6 CITY "OF' GRAND TERRACE,
Y,
Bea Cortes
Playor,ProTem - .
CRA/CITY.COUNCIL
Herman Hilkey"
Lee Ann Garcia . :REGULAR MEETINGS
,Iim Miller .
l�Ion,asJ:Scll�,ab 2ND AND.4TH Thursday -
City t•'I winger .r
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center "
22795 Barton Road
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 13, 2006
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 PM
22795 Barton Road
THE CITY OF"GRAND TERRACE COMPIIES"WITH T HE AMERICANS WTI H DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990:"IFYOU
REQUIRE SPECI'L ASSISTANCE TO"PARTICIPATE"IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE AT(00 824 6621 AT LEAST#HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING
Y±YOU:DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE;1MEETING,PLEASE C011II'LETE A REQUEST
TO SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO"THE CITY CLERK SPEAKERS WILL
_.."
BE CALLED UPON"BY THE MAYOR AT THE"APPROPRIATE TIME
* Call to Order-
* Invocation-
* Pledge of Allegiance-
* Roll Call-
STAFF COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION
CONVENE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY COUNCIL AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
1. Jack Brown,CEO/Don Baker,President of Stater Bros.Markets
2. Steve Gale,Director of Real Estate,Lowe's,Western Division
3. Owner Participation Proposals from Jacobsen Family Holdings
and Stringfield Investment Company.
-Staff Report
-Jacobsen Family Holdings Proposal
-Stringfield Investment Company Proposal
-Council&Commission Discussion
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Approval of 03-09-2006 Minutes
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Items to Delete .
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation-National Crime Victims'Week
B. Proclamation=Child Abuse Prevention Month
C. Proclamation-Community Development Week
D. Women of Distinction
E. Home of Distinction
COUNCIL AGENDA
04-13-2006 PAGE 2 OF 3
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council atone time
without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen
may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
A. Approve Check Register Dated 04-13-06
B.- Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
C. Approval of.02-09-2006&03-09-2006 Minutes
D. Special Event Permit Requested by Calvary,The Brook for
the use of Rollins Park for a Sunrise Service and Easter
Experience on Sunday,April 16,2006
E. Redlining Curbing on the West Side of 12210 Michigan in
Front of Park Center Business Park
F. Request to use California Law Enforcement Equipment
Program(CLEEP)Funding for Survelliance Camera
Purchases
G. Council and City Manager Meeting Attendance-Legislative
Action Days,,Sacramento May 17& 18,2006
H. Authorization for the MIS Specialist to Attend Interop in
Nevada,May 1-5,2006 l
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment
on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of
restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council is
prohibited from discussing or acting on any item not on the
agenda. The Mayor may request a brief response from staff
to questions raised during public comment.
5. REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
1. Emergency Operations Committee
a. Minutes of 2-7-06&3-7-06
b. Appoint Alternate Members
2. Crime Prevention Committee
a. Minutes of 2-13-06
3. Historical&Cultural Activities Committee
a. Minutes of 2-6-06&3-6-06
B. Council Reports
COUNCIL AGENDA
04-13-2006 PAGE 3 OF 3
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace,California,Amending Chapter 8.112 of the
Municipal Code and Regulating the Sale and Discharge of
Fireworks
B. Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee
Calculation&Nexus Report,Circulation Fees Calculation
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace Rescinding the Traffic Signal Improvement Fee
Schedule and Circulation Fee Schedule(4.104)and
Replacing it with a new Fee Structure and Rescinding the
Capital Improvement and Maintenance Fee Schedule
(4.80)and replacing it with a new fee structure
C. Specific Plan No. 05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative .
Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766)and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21)to
construct a 35 single family condominium development
Ordinance of the City Council Approving Specific Plan
No. 05-02(SP-05-02)for a condominium subdivision with
35 single family detached units on a 3.1 acre site located
on the westerly side of Mt.Vernon Avenue at 11830 Mt.
Vernon Avenue and Environmental Review Case No.05-
21 (E-05-21)Mitigated Negative Declaration as Provided
by the California Environmental Quality Act
Resolution of the City of Grand Terrace Approving
Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(TTM 17766)for a 35
Single Family Residential Condominium Development in
the City of Grand Terrace
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Appropriation for Emergency Roof Repair
CLOSED SESSION-None
ADJOURN
THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD
ON THURSDAY,APRIL 27, 2006 AT 6:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 04-27-2006 MEETING
MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE BY NOON 04-20-2006.
STAFF REPORT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
April 13, 2006
CRA ITEM (X) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: ,
SUBJECT: Owner Participation Proposals From Jacobsen Family Holdings and
Stringfield Investment Company
FUNDING REQUIRED: YES () NO (X)
The Community Redevelopment Law as well as the redevelopment plan of the City of Grand Terrace provides that property owners will be given a
reasonable opportunity to participate in redevelopment by, among other things,
retaining all or a portion of their property or acquiring adjacent or other properties
in the Project Area.
Two property owners within the project area, Jacobsen Family Holdings and
Stringfield Investment Company, have expressed a desire to develop a 1.94 acre
commercially zoned parcel owned by Jo Stringfield that is presently improved
with a single family residence. The Agency's Owner Participation Rules provide
that where conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular
sites or land uses, the Agency is authorized to determine a solution by
consideration of such factors as length of time in the area, accommodation of as
many participants as possible, ability to perform; similar land use to similar land
use and conformity with the intent and purpose of the Plan.
t� The two proposals are the only owner participation proposals that will be
heard at the meeting-tonight. Through this presentation staff seeks direction
from the Agency Board on which if any of the two proposals the Agency Board
wishes staff to pursue.
Each proponent will be given an opportunity to present their proposal to the
Agency Board. In addition to presenting their development site plan and their
assessment of their project's benefit to the City and Project Area, we have asked
them to.include in their proposal the following information:
DEVELOPER/DEVELOPMENT TEAM INFORMATION
A. Identification of Development Entity. The Agency will accept
proposals from entities and/or a combination of entities including,but not
limited to, private corporations, for-profit developers, non-profit
developers and private individuals. Joint ventures or partnerships formed
for the purpose of strengthening team qualifications are acceptable.
Legal and financial development entities formed for the development will
provide a description of its legal and financial responsibilities and
liabilities as part of the submittal package.
B. Identification of Developer and Associates. The proposal shall
include the following information with respect to the Developer and
associate members of the team:
1. Name, address, telephone, email and fax number of the
development entity. Responses shall identify a specific contact
person(s).
2. Identification and organization of development entity
(individual, company, corporation, partnership,joint venture, etc.)
3. Identification of principals of the development organization
(e.g. corporate officers, principal stockholders, general and limited
partners).and manager responsible for the project. — 1
4. Indicate any relationship the development entity may have
with a parent corporation, subsidiaries,join ventures or other
entities.
5. Identification of the roles and expertise of the development
team. For example, architectural firm, principal associates or
consultants working with the development team on the project.
C. Financial Capability. Proposals shall include the following
information with respect to the Developer and associate members of the
team:
6. Copies of annual reports, financial rating reports or other
documents indicating the financial condition of the development
entity. i
i
7. Statement indicating how the development entity proposes
to finance the project. The statement should show the proposed
source(s) of financing.
8. List of names and addresses of bank(s) and/or financial
institutions the development team may.use.and references. To
support the proposal, a letter of recommendation from the
development entity's bank would be helpful in assessing
qualifications.
D. Development Experience.
9. Provide a list of similar projects in which the developer and
team have participated. The list should include, but is not limited
to;a description-of the project's location, type, size, design
features and development time frame.
10. Identify the development teams past experience in
working with a local community and city to arrive at development
conceptual consensus.
11. Submit descriptions and illustrations of the proposed
architect's work on development projects that have been built or
are under construction. These should be similar in scale and
uses if possible.
12. Identify the development team's past experience and
explain each person's role and expertise in areas such as
development, leasing, architecture, project financing, marketing
community consensus building, and project management.
Identify the overall team leader responsible for coordinating the
project.
13. Describe experience in the ownership and management of
completed projects.
14. Provide any other relevant information regarding the ability
of the developer and the development team to complete projects
of this size, caliber, and scope.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
COUNCIL CONSIDER THE TWO PROPOSALS AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION AS TO
WHICH OWNER PARTICIPATION PROPOSAL IT WISHES TO ACCEPT AND DIRECT
STAFF TO CARRY OUT THE NECESSARY ACTIONS TO ACCOMPLISH THE PROJECT.
March 1,2006`
Douglas Jacobsen
- Jacobsen Family Holdings
CALIFORNIA 4733 Westchester Dr.
Woodland Hills, CA 91364
Re: Towne Center Project
22161 Barton Road: APN# 1167-231-09
22795 Barton Road 22209 Barton Road: APN# 1167-231-06
Grand Terrace 22219 Barton Road:APN# 1167-231-05
California 22257 Barton Road: APN# 1167-231-03
92313-5295 12135 Michigan Street: APN# 1167-231-12
12173 Michigan Street: APN# 1167-231-13
12201 Michigan Street: APN# 1167-241-01
Civic Center
(909) 824-6621 Dear Mr. Jacobsen:
Fax (909)783-7629
Fax(909)783-2600 The Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency Board has asked me to
place Dennis D. Jacobsen Holdings' owner participation proposal(s) on
the Agenda for its March 23,.2006,meeting. The meeting will take
Maryetta Ferr6 place at Grand Terrace City Hall Council Chambers, 22795 Barton {
Mayor Road, Grand Terrace, California, at 6:0O p.m.
Bea Cortes At that time the Board intends to review Jacobsen Holdings'
Mayor Pro Tempore development proposal for its above listed properties and the Stringfield
property and the competing proposal by Stringfield Investments for
Council Members development of the Stringfield property. Please note that the Agency's
Lee Ann Garcia Owner Participation Rules provide:
Herman Hilkey
Jim T.Miller If conflicts develop between the.desires of.participants for particular
sites or land uses,the Agency is.authorized to establish reasonable
Thomas J. Schwab priorities and preferences among the owners and tenants and to
City Manager determine a solution by consideration of such factors as length of time
in the area; accommodation of as many participants as possible; ability
to perform; similar land use to similar land use;conformity with intent
and purpose of the Plan.
If you wish to make additional submissions in connection with.your
proposal(s),please do so by March 16,2006, so that they can be
included in the Board Members' Agenda Packets. The attached
guideline for submission of proposals to the Agency identifies
information that would be useful to the Agency in evaluating your
proposal(s). Also it would be helpful to have an explanation of the
benefits you perceive would accrue to the City if your proposal were
selected over that proposed by Stringfield.
Sincerely,
Thomas Schwab
Executive Director
Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency
xc: Maryetta Ferre',Mayor
Bea Cortes,Mayor Pro Tem
Herman Hilkey,Council Member
Lee Ann Garcia., Council Member
Jim Miller, Council Member
DEVELOPER/DEVELOPMENT TEAM INFORMATION
A. Identification of Development Entity. The Agency will accept
proposals from entities and/or a combination of entities including,but not
limited to,private corporations, for-profit developers, non-profit developers
and private individuals. Joint ventures or partnerships formed for the
purpose of strengthening team qualifications are acceptable. Legal and
financial development entities formed for the development will provide a
description of its legal and financial responsibilities and liabilities as part of
the submittal package.
B. Identification of Developer and Associates. The proposal shall
include the following information with respect to the Developer and
associate members of the team:
1. Name, address, telephone, email and fax number of the
development entity. Responses shall identify a specific contact.
person(s).
2. Identification and organization of development entity,
(individual, company, corporation,partnership,joint venture, etc.)
3. Identification of principals of the development organization
(e.g. corporate officers,principal stockholders,general and limited
partners) and manager responsible for the project.
4. Indicate any relationship the development entity may have
with a parent corporation, subsidiaries,join ventures or other
entities.
5. Identification of the roles and expertise of the development
team. For example,architectural firm,principal associates or
consultants working with the development team on the project.
C. Financial Capability. Proposals shall include the following
information with respect to the Developer and associate members of the
team:
6. Copies of annual reports, financial rating reports or other
documents indicating the financial condition of the development
entity.
7. Statement indicating how the development entity proposes
to finance the project. The statement should show the proposed
source(s) of financing.
8. List of names and addresses of bank(s) and/or financial
institutions the development team may use and references. To
support the proposal, a letter of recommendation from the
development entity's bank would be helpful in assessing
qualifications.
D. Development Experience.
1. Provide a list of similar projects in which the developer and
team have participated. The list should include,but is not limited to,
a description of the projeces location;type, size, design features and
development time frame.
2. Identify the development teams past experience in working
with a local community and city to arrive at development conceptual
consensus.
3. Submit descriptions and illustrations of the proposed
architect's work on development projects that have been built or are
under construction. These should be similar in scale and uses if
possible.
4. Identify the development team's past experience and explain
each person's role and expertise in areas such as development,
leasing,architecture,project financing,marketing community
consensus building,and project management. Identify the overall
team leader responsible for coordinating the.project.
5. Describe experience in the ownership and management of
- completed projects.
6. Provide any other relevant information regarding the ability
of the developer and the development team to complete projects of
this size, caliber, and scope.
r
j
c A L IFORN 1 A February 27,2006
Jo Stringfield
22273 Barton Road,
22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Grand Terrace
California .e4. o&rt Ferguson
92313-5295 237 W. Fourth Street .
Claremont, CA 91711
Civic Center Re: Towne Center.Project
(909) 824-6621 22273 Barton Road
Fax (909)783-7629 APN: 1167-231-02-000
Fax (909)783-2600
Dear.Ms. Stringfield and Mr. Ferguson:
Maryetta Ferre
Mayor The Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency Board has asked me to
place Ms. Stringfield's owner participation proposal(s) on the Agenda
Bea Cortes for its March 23, 2006, meeting. The meeting will take place at Grand
Mayor Pro Tempore Terrace City Hall Council Chambers,22795 Barton Road, Grand
Terrace, California, at 6:00 p.m.
Council Members
Lee Ann Garcia At that time the Board intends to review Ms. Stringfield's development
Herman Hilkey proposal for her property at 22273 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, and the
Jim T. Miller competing proposal by Dennis D. Jacobsen Family Holdings II; LLC
(Jacobsen)that involves her property. Please note that the Agency's
Thomas J. Schwab Owner Participation Rules provide:
City Manager
If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular
sites or land uses,the Agency is authorized to establish reasonable
priorities and preferences among the owners and tenants and to
determine a solution by consideration of such factors as length of time
in the area; accommodation of as many participants as possible; ability
to perform; similar land use.to similar land use; conformity with intent
and purpose of the Plan.
Jo Stringfield
February 27,2006
.Page 2
Please note that the Agency is already party to a Disposition and
Development Agreement with Jacobsen for the parcels it owns/controls
and the Agency owned properties at 22181 Barton Road, 22237 Barton
Road, 22293 Barton Road and 22317 Barton Road. If your proposal is
to include any of those parcels you will have to explain how you intend
to acquire the development rights from Jacobsen and demonstrate your
financial ability to.advance all costs necessary to do so. Please note that
the Agency is not providing financial assistance to Jacobsen in
connection with the Towne Center Shopping Center and is not
interested in considering a proposal that would involve such assistance.
If you wish to make additional submissions in connection with your
proposal(s),please do so by March 16,2006, so that they can be
included in the Board Members' Agenda Packets. The attached
guideline for submission of proposals to the Agency identifies .
information that would be useful to the Agency in evaluating your
proposal(s). Also.it would be helpful to have an explanation of the
benefits you perceive would accrue to the City if your proposal were
selected over that proposed by Jacobsen.
Sincerely, '
Thomas Schwab
Executive Director.
Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency
xc: . Maryetta Ferre',Mayor .
-Bea Cortes,Mayor Pro Tem
Herman Hilkey,Council Member
Lee Ann Garcia, Council Member .
Jim Miller, Council Member
DEVELOPER/DEVELOPMENT TEAM INFORMATION
A. Identification of Development Entity. The Agency will accept
proposals from entities and/or a combination of entities including,but not
limited to,private corporations, for-profit developers,non-profit developers
and private individuals. joint ventures or partnerships formed for the
purpose of strengthening team qualifications are acceptable. Legal and
financial development entities formed for the development will provide a ,
description of its legal and financial responsibilities and liabilities as part of
the submittal package.
B. Identification of Developer and Associates. The proposal shall
include the following information with respect to the Developer and
associate members of the team:
1. Name,address, telephone,email and fax number of the
development entity. Responses shall identify a specific contact
person(s).
2. Identification and organization of development entity
(individual, company,corporation,partnership,joint venture, etc.)
3. Identification of principals of the development organization
(e.g..corporate officers,principal stockholders,general and limited
partners) and manager responsible for the project.
4. Indicate any relationship the development entity.may have
with a parent corporation, subsidiaries,join ventures or other
entities.
5. Identification of the roles and expertise of the development
team. For example,architectural firm,principal associates or
consultants working with the development team on the project.
C. Financial Capability. Proposals shall include the following
information with respect to the Developer and associate members of the
team:
6. Copies of annual reports, financial rating reports or other
documents indicating the financial condition of the development
entity.
7. Statement indicating how the development entity proposes
to finance the project. The statement should show the proposed
source(s) of financing.
Jo Stringfield
February 27, 2006
Page 2
8. List of names and addresses of.bank(s) and/or financial
institutions the development team may use and references.To
support the proposal,.a letter of recommendation from the
-development entity's bank would be helpful in:assessing
qualifications.
D. Development Experience.
1. Provide a list of similar projects in which the developer and .
team have participated. The list should include, but is not limited to,
a description of the project's location, type, size, design features and
development time frame.
2. Identify the development teams past experience in working
with a local community and city to arrive at development conceptual
consensus.
3. Submit descriptions and illustrations of the proposed
architect's work on development projects that have been built or are
under construction. These should be similar in scale and uses if
possible.
4. Identify the development team's past experience and explain
_ each person's role and expertise in areas such as development,
leasing,architecture,project financing,marketing community
consensus building, and project management. Identify the overall
team leader responsible for coordinating the project.
5. Describe experience in the ownership and management of
completed projects.
6. Provide any other relevant information regarding the ability
of the developer and the development team to complete projects of
this size, caliber, and scope.
I
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE `
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING-MARCH 9, 2006
A regular_meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in
the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,
on March 9, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT:, Maryetta Ferr6, Chairman
Herman Hilkey, Agency Member
Lee Ann Garcia, Agency Member
Jim Miller, Agency Member
Tom Schwab, Executive Director
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
Lang Ronnow,Finance Director
Gary Koontz, Community Development Director
Richard Shields,Building& Safety Director
Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriff's Department
ABSENT: Bea Cortes,Vice-Chairman
John Harper, City Attorney
APPROVAL OF 02-23-2006 MINUTES
CRA-2006-07 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
MILLER, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN CORTES WAS ABSENT), to
approve the February 23, 2006 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes.
MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006
CRA-2006-08 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
GARCIA, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (VICE-CHAIRMAN CORTES WAS ABSENT), to
approve the following Revenue Adjustments to the FY-05-06 Agency Budget as
recommended by Staff.
32-300-02 -Rollins Park Grant Funding- $174,789
Chairman Ferr6 adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:30 p.m.,until the
next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, March 23, 2006, at 6:00 p.m.
i
I
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS WEEK
April 23 - 295 2006 =
WHEREAS, one violent crime is committed in America every 18 seconds; and j
WHEREAS,36.9 million Americans are victimized in the United States each year,
and of those, 9.9 million are victims of violent crime, and
WHEREAS, crime victims play an indispensable role in bringing offenders to
justice; and
WHEREAS,law-abiding citizens are no less deserving ofjustice,rights,resources,
restoration and rehabilitation titan the violent offenders who victimize them; and
WHEREAS, crime victims and their advocates over the past two decades have
made unparalleled progress toward balancing tit scales ofjustice in our criminal justice
system; and
WHEREAS, as a nation devoted to liberty and justice for all, America must
increase its efforts to protect, restore and expand crime victims'rights; _
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby
proclaim the week ofApri123-29, 2006 as National Crime Victims' Week in the City of
Grand Terrace.
This 13"' day of April, 2006
Mayor Ferri Mayor Pro Tem Cortes
Council Member Hilkey Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller
f _ s 6 1 F
4
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH
April 2006
WHEREAS,April 2006 has beet:proclaimed as Child Abuse Prevention Month by the
state and federal government for the purpose ofpromoting community involvement in preventing
child abuse; all children have the right to receive the care,protection and guidance a family
provides; they have the right to be free from harm.and to have their physical, emotional and
educational needs met,and
WHEREAS, more than 39,000 children in the County of San Bernardino were referred
in 2004 to the Department of Children's Services for suspected child abuse and neglect,
Ch ildren's A ss essm en t Cen ter staff,DCSSocial Workers,Public Health Nurses,law enforcement
officers, educators, behavioral health clinicians and others in the field are dedicated,
compassionate and skilled individuals working under enormous pressure to protect children;the
prevention of child abuse requires rigorous solutions, energy, strength, determination and
commitment on the part of concerned citizens and the community;and
WHEREAS,the Blue Ribbon is the international symbol for child abuse prevention;the
_.
Children's.Network and Children's Fund in partnership with the Department of Children's
Services,Department ofPublic Health,First 5San Bernardino, Community Action Partnership,
County Superintendent of Schools, Sheriffs Department, Child Care Planning Council,
Department of Behavioral Health,Preschool Services Department, County Library,Arrowhead
Regional Medical Center,Children's FundAssessment Center,Lon:aLinda University Children Is
Hospital, County Fire Department, have planned a Blue Ribbon Media Campaign entitled `It
Only Takes a Minute,"Educational Materials Distribution, the 8'"Annual "Shine A Light on
Child Abuse"Awards Breakfast to increase awareness of child abuse during the month of April;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, .does hereby
proclaim Apri12006 as CHILD ABUSE PRE VENTION MONTH in the City of Grand Terrace
and encourage citizens to participate in the events and to join in the efforts to end child abuse.
This 13'`'day of April, 2006.
Mayor Ferri Mayor Pro Tem Cortes
Council Member Hilkey Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller
K `
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK 2006
April 17= 23, 2006
f
`
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program k 4;
originated in 1974 and has operated since 1975 to provide local governments with the
vs resources required to meet the needs ofpersoizs of low and moderate income, and CDBG ; <:
funds are used by thousands of neighborhood based non-profit organizations throughout `- ~
the nation to address pressing neighborhood and human service needs; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Program. has had a
significant impact on our local economies through job creation and retention,physical ,
redevelopment and improved local tax bases; and
WHEREAS, City, USA and local governments have clearly demonstrated the
capacity to administer and customize the CDBGprogram to identify and resolve pressing
local problems,such as affordable housing neighborhood and human services needs,job
_ creation and retention: and physical redevelopment; -
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby
join with San Bernardino County in celebrating the 32"d anniversary of the Community
Development Block Grant Program, and proclaim the week of April 17 through,April 23,
2006 as National Community Development Week in-the City of Grand Terrace and urge
all citizens to join us in recognizing the Community Development Program and the e
importance it serves to our community.
This 13"' day of April, 2006.
Mayor Ferre Mayor Pro Tem Cortes
Council Member Hilkey Council Member Garcia Council Member Miller
Ci
ti
z
1'
vchlist Voucher List _ Y Page: 1
03/15/2006 6:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND-TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57155 3/2/2006 001907 COSTCO#478 047813018651 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 64.28
10-440-228-000-000 9.1.85
Total : 156.13
57156 3/2/2006 01.0603 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, COLTON 030206 Reg.-100th Ann. Celebration-
10-110-270-000-000 150.00
10-120-270-000-000 75.00
Total : 225.00
57157 3/3/2006 004301' LAMPE, JOHN W. 03152006 Birthday Bonus
10-370-110-000-000 35.00
32-370-110=000-000 10.00
34-400-110-000-000 . 5.00
Total : 50.00
57158 3/3/2006 010178 ALMARAZ, ALEXIS 03222006 Birthday Bonus
10-440-110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57159 3/3/2006 010176 HERNANDEZ, JOSE 03222006 Birthday Bonus
17-910-110-000=000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57160 3/3/2006 010604 SHIELDS, RICHARD 03232006 Birthday Bonus
10-172-110-000-000 12.50
10-175-110-000-000 10.00
34400-110-000-000 27.50
Total : 50.00
57161 3/3/2006 005663 PRECIE, DENNICE 03292006 Birthday Bonus
10-440-110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57162 3/3/2006 006331 RONNOW, LARRY 03303006 Birthday Bonus
10-140-110-000-000 50.00
Page: 1
N314
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57162 3/3/2006 006331 RONNOW, LARRY (Continued) Total : 50.00
57163 3/3/2006. 010013 MAURICIO,VERA 03302006. Birthday Bonus
10-440-110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57164 3/3/2006 010603 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, COLTON 031006 Reg-100th Ann. Colton-J. Miller
10-110-270-000-000` 150.00
Total : 150.00
57165 3/3/2006 010340 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, PERS-CH 0018686051 HEALTH INS B CORTES
10-110-142-000-000 408.59
Total : 408.59
57166 3/6/2006 004587 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK March, 2006 MHN INSURANCE
34-400-142-000-000 16.97
34-800-142-000-000 11.92
10-120-142-000-000 18.05
10-125-142-000-000 12.03
10-140-142-000-000 18.05
10-172-142-000-000 3.01
1-0-175-142-000-000 2.41
10-180-142-000-000 20.53
10-370-142-000-000 8.42
10-380-142-000-000 6.02
10-440-142-000-000 138.03
10-450-142-000-000 6.02
21-572-142-000-000 6.02
32-370-142-000-000 6.02
Total : 273.60
57167 3/7/2006 010164 GREAT-WEST FEB2006 Feb 06 deferred comp contribution
10-022-63-00 8,471.23
10-022-64-00 2,900.74
Total : 11,371.97
57168 3/7/2006 006315 ROLLINS, RICHARD FEB2006 Park opening and closing svcs-Feb
10-450-245-000-000 1,085.00
Page: 2
vchlist
V __. ,her List Page: 3
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57168 3/7/2006 006315 . ROLLINS, RICHARD (Continued) Total : 1,086.00
57169 3/7/2006 010607 VICTORYSTORE.COM 15412 Fans for GT days
23-200-12-00 470.54
Total : 470.54
57170 3/7/2006 010608 UNCLE JERRY'S T'S FEB2006 Fundraiser,towels for Child Care
23-200-14-00 4,741.00
Total : 4,741.00
5.7171 3/8/2006 002673 FLANN, ALISA 030706 Reimburse repair expense
34-700-771-000-000 139.00
Total : 139.00
57172 . 3/8/2006 001907 COSTCO#478 04781401655 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 127.89
10-440-228-000-000 22.19
Total : 150.08
57173 3/8/2006 010110 REED, CAROLYN 030706 Reimburse repairs/expenses
10-190-260-000-000 400.00
Total : 400.00
57174 3/13/2006 007402 (NEOPOST POSTAGE-ON CALL), U.S..P003132006 Postage for Meter#74456587
10-190-211-000-000 1,500.00
Total : 1,500.00
57175 3/13/12006 001685 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 853747 2006 All Risk Ins
10-190-260-000-000 6,796.00 .
Total.: 6,796.00
57176 3/14/2006 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT pr end 2/24/06 Contributions for.PR end 2/24/06
10-022-62-00 12,619.18
Total : 12,619.18
57177 3/14/2006 010546 MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS Feb. 387767 Feb. phone charges
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57177 3/14/2006 0.10546 MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS (Continued)
10-440-235-000-000 313.42
10-450-235-000-000 30.32
10-805-235-000-000 30.96
Total : 374.70
57178 3/14/2006 010546 MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS Mar. 2006 Mar. phone charges
10-190-235-000-000 1,445.48
10-808-235-000-000 70.59
Total : 1,516.07
57179 3/14/2006 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY Feb. 2006 Feb. Electricity
10-450-238-000-000 561.07
16-510-238-000-000 4,948.24
10-190-238-000-000 2,222.80
10-805-238-000-000 646.48
15-500-601-000-000 19.80
10-440-238-000-000 641.53
34-400-238-000-000 68.63
10-175-238-000-000 24.96
10-172-238-000-000 31.19
26-600-238-000-000 49.80
26-601-238-000-000 41.50
26-602-238-000-000 58.10
Total : 9,314.10
57180 3/15/2006 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 9607828630000 Feb/Mar Bldq.&Sfty cell phone charges
34-400-235-000-000 123.42
Total : 123.42
57181 3/23/2006 010293 AVAYA, INC. 2723166513 MAINTENANCE FOR PHONE SYSTEM &VOICE M,
10-180-246-000-000 183.46
Total : 183.46
57182 3/23/2006 001383 BARR DOOR INC. 8333 Fix 1 west City Hall Door
10-180-245-000-000 483.55
Total : 483.65
Page: 4
vchlist W cc her List _ Page: 5
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57183 .3/23/2006 010538 BRAUNSTEIN, ELLEN 02162006 Rosenkild & Rentals stories
10-180-255-000-000 300.00
Total : 300.00
57184 3/23/2006 001713 CA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 173371 Jan. F215 signal mainttenergy
16-510-238-000-000 41.16
Total : 41.16
57185 3/23/2006 001683 CA. STATE DEPT OF CONSERVATION 030806 Strong motion fees-2nd qtr.
10-700-01 -8.93
121505 Strong motion.fees 10/05-12/05
23-200-21-00 178.69
Total : 169.76
57186 3/23/2006 001705 CA. STATE DEPT. OF JUSTICE 557305 EMP BACKGROUND CHECKS
10-190-226-000-000 96.00
Total : 96.00
57187 3/23/2006 001498 CALBO 030106 Class I Membership-R. Shields
10=172-265-000-000 215.00
Total : 215.00
57188 3/23/2006 010217 CALIFORNIA.OVERNIGHT .5108074 Feb. Document Delivery
10-120-210-000-000 10.52
Total : 10.52
57189 3/23/2006 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 141928 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES.
10-450-245-000-000 335.84
Total : 335.84
57190 3/23/2006 010609 CORDOVA'S ITALIAN APPAREL ob05206 MAKE 19 VESTS FOR EOC
10-808-247-000-000 511.81
Total : 511.81
57191 3/23/2006 010147 CORTES, BEA March06 March06 Council Stipend
32-200-1207000-000 150.00
10-110-120-000-000. 250.00
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor . Invoice Description/Account Amount
57191 3/23/2006 010147 CORTES, BEA (Continued) Total : 400.00
57192 3/23/2006 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B930673 PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER
10-370-230-000-000 270.90
B931725 LEGAL ADVERTISING
10-125-230-000-000 128.14
Total : 399.04
57193 3/23/2006 001937 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY 704651543 COPIER CHARGES
10-172-246-000-000 21.71
10-175-246-000-000 27.14
34-400-246-000-000 59.72
Total : 108.57
57194 3/23/2006 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 013712/901129,' Maint supplies
10-180-245-000-000 58.59
028973/2021351 SUPPLIES
10=180-246-000-000 30.67
2754/0041009 Maint supplies
10-180-245-000-000 32.03
Total : 121.29
57195 3/23/2006. 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 6170 ON GOING WEED CONTROL AT CITY PARKS
10-450-245-000-000 500.00
6190 LAWN CARE
34-700-767-000-000 40.00
Total : 540.00
57196 3/23/2006 010595 EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS 35356 3" PINE CHIPS
10-180-245-000-000 562.55
Total : 562.55
57197 3/23/2006 010606 EMMERSON, ASSEMBLYMAN BILL 03062006 3/30 Women of Dist. Lunch-Berry
10-180-270-000-000 31.00
03072006 3/30 Women of Dist. Lunch
10-125-270-000-000 31.00
10-110-270-000-000 31.00
Page: 6
vchlist her List � Page: 7
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57197 3/23/2006 010606 EMMERSON,ASSEMBLYMAN BILL (Continued) Total 93.00
57198 3/23/2006 010542 EMPIRE TRUCK& EQUIP REPAIR 18236 STREET SWEEPER MAINT
16-900-254-000-000 745.36
Total : 745.36
57199 3/23/2006 002280 EVER READY EMBROIDERY 324 Shirts
34-400-220-000-000 83.99
34-800-218-000-000 84.52
10-180-218-000-000. 148.61 ,
Total : 317.12
57200 3/23/2006 010537 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 967 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
10-180-255-000-000 185.47
Total : 185.47
57201 3/23/2006 002450 FERRE', MARYETTA MARCH06 March 06 Council Stipend
10-110-120-000-000 250.00
- 32-200-120-0007000 150.00
Total : 400.00
57202 . 3/23/2006 001879 FRANKLIN COVEY 52845347 FRANKLIN COVEY PLANNER
34-400-210-000-000. 26.01
Total : 26.01
57203 3/23/2006 002727 FREEMAN COMPANY, J.R 3192870A Taxes not paid from invoice#3192870
10-120-210-000-000 4.57
Total : 4.57
57204 3/23/2006 002740 FRUIT GROWERS.SUPPLY 32078289 SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 14.67
32078519 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 244.75
32078536 SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 78.11
32078560 SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 36.17
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Page: 8
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57204 3/23/2006 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY (Continued) Total : 373.70
57205 3/23/2006 002901 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4195-AD BLUE MT OUTLOOK
10-125-213-000-000 620.00
Total : 620.00
57206 3/23/2006 002795 GARCIA, LEE ANN March06 March06 Council Stipend
32-200-120-000-000 150.00
10-110-120-000-000 231.97
Total : 381.97
57207 3/23/2006 010181 GOPHER PATROL Feb. 2006 GOPHER ERADICATION SERVICE
10-450-245-000-000 775.00
Total : 775.00
57208 3/23/2006 010425 GRAND TERRACE MARTIAL ARTS Mar. 2006 Mar. martial arts class
10-430-27 602.00
Total : 602.00
57209 3/23/2006 010559 GST 490022 Jan 23rd desktop.maint.-Fin. Dept
10-140-250-000-000 427.50
Total : 427.50
57210 3/23/2006 003152 HARPER& BURNS LLPN 030106 Feb. City Legal Services
10-160-250-000-000 5,344.90
Total : 5,344.90
57211. 3/23/2006 003200 HILKEY, HERMAN MARCH06 March 06 Council Stipend
32-200-120-000-000 150.00
10-110-120-000-000 250.00
Total : 400.00
57212 3/23/2006 003213 HONEYWELL ACS SERVICE 840846 B &S HVAC call
10-180-246-000-000 167.44
Total : 167.44
57213 3/23/2006 003216 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC. 06-11781 SEWER MAINTENANCE AND HYDROWASING
�� Page: 8
vchlist V> her List Page: 9
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account ,. Amount
57213 3/23/2006 003216 . HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC. (Continued)
21-573-602-000-000 1,807.20
21-573-602-000-000 2,712.50
Total,: 4,519.70
57214 3/23/2006 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 04341288-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 160.63
Total : 160.63
57215 . 3/23/2006 006880 IDENTIX IDENTIFICATION SRVS 030106 Fingerprint fee/Makona
10-440-228-000-000 97.00
Total : 97.00
57216 3/23/2006 010576 INLAND EMPIRE ROOFING SUPPLY 48298 Balance due on inv.
10-180-245-000-000 129.31
48298a . CITY HALL'S SKYLIGHT PANELS
10-180-245-000-000 911.56
Total : 1,040.87
57217 3/23/2006 003490 INMARK/VICTOR 36253 SIGNS
16-900-220-000-000 268.50
16-900-220-000-000 20.81
Total : 289.31
57218 3/23/2006 010339 INT'L COUNCIUSHOPPING CENTERS 021706 06 Renewal of Membership
10-120-265-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57219 3/23/2006 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 44457 INTERNET WEBSITE HOSTING
10-180-255-000-000 75.00
Total : 75.00
57220 3/23/2006 003850 JANI-KING LAX02061903 BUILDING CLEANING
10-440-244-000-000 50.00
LAX03060064 BUILDING CLEANING
10-440-244-000-000 815.00
Total : 865.00
Page: 9
vchlist Voucher List Page: 10
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57221 3/23/2006 003856 JON'S FLAGS & POLES F54977 12 x 18 ft. U.S. Flag
10-180-245-000-000 366.35
Total : 366.35
57222 3/23/2006 003890 KELLY PAPER 144870 Office Supplies/Job Cards
34-400-210-000-000 37.03
Total : 37.03
57223 3/23/2006 01'0013 MAURICIO, VERA 010306 Mileage Reimb/Seminar
10-440-271-000-000 20.03
Total : 20.03
57224 3/23/2006 010446 MILLER, JIM March06 March06 Council Stipend
32-200-120-000-000 150.00
10-110-126-000-000 250.00
Total : 400.00
57225 3/23/2006 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025041 Cell svc.-Cornm_Svcs/Childcare
10-180-240-000-000 302.78
10-440-235-000-000 48.97
Total : 351.75
57226 3/23/2006 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 668910 Office Supplies
10-120-210-000-000 56.55
742391 Office Supplies
10-120-210-000-000 31.73
756149 Printer Toner
10-120-210-000-000 269.10
Total : 357.38
57227 3/23/2006 005586 PETTY CASH 03142006 Reimburse petty cash
10-440-220-000-000 39.97
10-440-221-000-000 6.32
10-440-223-000-000 99.30
10-440-228-000-000 38.49
Total : 184.08
57228 3/23/2006 005688 PROTECTION ONE 030506 ALARM MONITORING
Page: 10
vchlist V. ;her List Page:. 11
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57228 3/23/2006 005688 PROTECTION ONE (Continued)
10-180-247-000-000 98.95
Total : 98.95
57229 3/23/2006 010208 RATELLE, DAZE&ASSOCIATES Feb. 2006 CONSULTING
34-400-251-000-000 1,320.00
Total : 1,320.00
57230 3/23/2006 005673 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 27132534-001 Rent-4WD Tractor Loader
10-180-240-000-000 281.24
27566943-002 Rent-cutoff saw/blade
10-180-240-000-000 135.78
27611714-001 Rent-4WD Tractor Loader
10-180-240-000-000. 257.54
Total : 674.56
57231 3/23/2006 006331 RONNOW, LARRY 012006 Reimb. conf. expenses-P. Springs
10-140-270-000-000 69.04
Total : . 69.04
57232 3/23/2006 006335 ROQUET PAVING INC. 0302-06 R& R AC AROUND MANHOLE LARK/ORIOLE
16-900-260-000-000 6,198.00
Total : 6,198.00
57233 3/23/2006 006531 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 6407 SHERIFF CONTRACT
10-410-255-000-000 3,807.33
10-410-256-000-000 116,250..48
14-411-256-000-000 6,853.19
6486 2nd Qtr Overtime
10-410-250-000-000 11,477.88
10-410-256-000-000 1,043.37
Total : 139,432.25
57234 3/23/2006 010568.. S.B. COUNTY TREASURER .116716103 2005 Prop Taxes/2nd Payment
32-600-214-000-000 116.67
116716104 05 Taxes/2nd Installment
32-600-213-000-000 516.75
Page: 11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 12
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF.GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57234 3/23/2006 010568 S.B. COUNTY TREASURER- (Continued) Total : 633.42
57235 3/23/2006 010602 SA-SO MUNICIPAL/FULL LINE 4038101 24"WING BRACKET
16-900-220-000-000 434.40
10-180-245-000-000 360.80
34-800-210-000-000 59.95
34-800-220-000-000 59.70
16-900-220-000-000 107.29
10-180-245-000-000 89.11
34-800-210-000-000 14.81
34-800-220-000-000 14.74
Total : 1,140.80
57236 3/23/2006 005529 SBC CALIFORNIA 9098247013793, Childcare dsl svc.
10-440-235-000-000 16.80
Total : 16.80
57237 3/23/2006 004480 SCOTT LOGAN HEATING &AIR A0765 Furnace Insp.-Bldg &Sfty dept.
10-180-245-000-000 85.00
Total : 85.00
57238 3/23/2006 010040 SCOTT, MARY J. 012506 Mileage Reimb/Seminar
10-440-271-000-000 50.29
Total : 50.29
57239 3/23/2006 006730 SO.CA.GAS COMPANY Feb. 2006 Feb. Nat'l gas &CNG Fuel
10-190-238-000-000 395.54
10-440-238-000-000 133.20
10-805-238-000-000 37.42
10-190-719-000-000 47.44
10-180-272-000-000 58.40
10-440-272-000-000 19.47
34-800-272-000-000 19.47
Total : 710.94
57240 3/23/2006 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 9160105754 Office supplies
10-180-210-000-000 205.83
Page: 12
vchlist. Vr 3 'her List
Page: 13
0311S12006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57240 3/23/2006 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN (Continued)
9160469192 Ofc. Supp/Finance/Copy paper
10-140-210-000-000 50.67
10-190-212-000-000 71.09
9160655172 Copy paper supply
10-190-212-000-000 127.97
B703185001 Copy paper and office supplies
10-190-212-000-000 127.96
10-140-210-000-000 69.04
B703185011 Wrist rest
10-140-210-000-000 19.38
C310290001 Office supplies -
10-370-210-000-000 76.40
Total : 748.34
57241 3/23/2006 010141 SUNGLASS TINT CO. 03082006 Window tint
10-180-245-000-000. 385.00
Total : 385.00
57242 3/23/20,06 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 603010631 FOOD SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 496.80
603080663 FOOD SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 560.92
Total : 1,057.72
57243 3/23/2006 006980 TEXACO/SHELL 8000209687603 February Fuel
10-180-272-000-000 21.80
Total : 21.80
57244 3/23/2006 010586 THE JAMIESON GROUP 2006.31 PROVIDE PROF. SRVS FY 05/06
10-370-255-000-000 5,300.00
Total : 5,300.00
57245 3/23/2006 .010583 THE LOVE & LOGIC INSTITUE SMR000000031 SEMINAR .
10-440-270-000-000 99.00
SMR000000031 SEMINAR
10-440-270-000-000 99.00
Page: 13
vchlist Voucher List Page: 14
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57245 3/23/2006 010583 THE LOVE & LOGIC INSTITUE (Continued) Total : 198.00
57246 3/23/2006 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 220060287 DIG ALERT MONTHLY SERVICE
16-900-220-000-000 27.20
Total : 27.20
57247 3/23/2006 010605 URBAN FUTURES INCORPORATED 200411-06. Dissemination Svcs for City-Feb
33-300-210-000-000 1,750.00
Total : , 1,760.00
57248 3/23/2006 010421 VILLAGE ENTERPRISES, DARCY MCNAB 06-20 Feb. consulting srvs
10-180-255-000-000 260.00
Total : 260.00
57249 3/23/2006 010584 WALLIN, KRESS, REISMAN, ET AL. Jan. 2006 Jan. Prof. Services
23-301-95-00 2,835.00
Total : 2,835.00
57250 3/23/2006 007880 WEST GROUP 810821381 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
10-125-250-000-000 189.11
Total : 189.11
57251 3/23/2006 007854. WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO 264854, PEST CONTROL
10-180-245-000-000 80.00
10-440-245-000-000, 68.50
10-805-245-000-000 30.50
34-400-246-000-000 . 35.50
Total : 214.60
57252 3/23/2006 007920 WILLDAN 062-8301 Oct. Plan Rev. & Inspec. Srvs
10-172-250-000-000 9,407.40
34-400-251-000-000 1,575.00
0628455 _ Plan review/Inspections
10-172-250-000-000 ' 1,432.85
34-400-251-000-000 1,085.00
0628456 Bldq.&Sfty. Plan check svcs.
10-172-250-000-000 570.00
Page: 14
vchlist Vt__ her List ` Page:. 15
03/15/2006 5:35:23PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57252 3/23/2006 007920 WILLDAN (Continued)
062-8491 Feb. Plan Review&Inspec.'Srvs
10-172-250-000-000 617.50
34-400-251-000-000 1,540.00
Total 16,227J5
57253 3/23/2006 007938 WIRZ& COMPANY 44751 8-Bike Path Posters
32-370-230-000-000 193.95
Total : 193.95
3/15/2006 007400 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. March 2006 LEASE PAYMENTS
33-300-206-000-000 23,128.94
Total : 23,128.94
100 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 279,288.36
100 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 279,288.36
I certify.. that, to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment
Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate expenditures for the operation .of the
City and Agency.
J
Larry Ronnow, Finance, Director,
Page: 15
vchlist Voucher List ,'` '
Page: 1
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57254 3/17/2006 003420 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SVCS March 2006 March Dental &Vision Ins.
10-022-63-00 1,231.96
Total : 1,231.96
57255 3/17/2006 005452 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA March 2006 PACIFICARE HEALTH INS
34-400-142-000-000 1,012.05
32-370-142-000-000 238.40
34-800-142-000-000 243.90
10-120-142-000-000 870.49
10-125-142-000-000 487.80
. 10-140-142-000-000 1,078.84
10-172-142-000-000 152.33
10-175-142-000-000 121.87
10-180-142-000-000 885.67
10-370-142-000-000 834.38
10=380-142-000-000 290.51
10-440-142-000-000 795.57
10-450-142-000-000 243.90
21-572-142-000-000 327.98
10-022-61-00 7,904.95
Total : 15,488.64
57256 3/20/2006 005584 PETTY CASH 03202006 Reimburse petty cash
10-140-270-000-000 17.00
23-200-12-00 8.57
10-180-210-000-000 6.44
10-180-246-000-000 17.25
10-380-249-000-000 4.30
10-180-270-000-000 6.00.
10-180-272-000-000 11.67
10-190-211-000-000 20.43
10-190-220-000-000 23.90
10-808-246-000-000 26.38
16-900-254-000-000 22.60
10-140-255-000-000 25.00
Page: 1
i
I
vchlist \rbucher List Page: 2
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57256 3/20/2006 005584 PETTY CASH (Continued) . Total : 189.54
57257 3/20/2006 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 16 0205 1� C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 44.56
10-440-220-000-000 65.65
Total : 110.21
57258 3/20/2006 010367 LOMA LINDA UNIV. HEALTH CARE 03012006 NEW HIRE PHYSICALS & EMP INSS
10-190-224-000-000 148.00
Total : 148.00
57259 3/20/2006 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE Apr. 2006 HEALTH INS-LEE ANN GARCIA
10-110-142-000-000 308.54
Total : 308.54
57260 3/20/2006 010608. UNCLE JERRY'S T'S 03142006 Fundraiser-Towel Order
23-200-14-00 990.00
Total : 990.00
57261 3/21/2006 006772 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY March 2006 STE LIFE AND DISABILITY INS.
34-400-142-000-000 21.32
34-800-142-000-000 19.50
10-022-63-00 1,280.43
10-120-142-000-000 19.50
10-125-142-000-000 13.00
10-140-142-000-000 19.50
10-172-142-000-000 3.26
10-175-142-000-000 2.60
10=180-142-000-000 18.88
10-370-142-000-000 8.22
10-380-142-000-000 6.50
10-440-142-000-000 76.75
10-450-142-000-000 6.50
21-572-142-000-000 5.87
32-370-142-000-000 2.35
Total : 1,504.18
57262 3/21/2006 010428 CITY OF RIVERSIDE 03202006 Plan check dep.-OAC/High School
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List . Pager 3
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor ' Invoice Description/Account Amount
57262 3/21/2006 010428 CITY OF RIVERSIDE (Continued)
32-600-205-000-000 2,500.00
32-600-208-000-000 2,500.00
Total : 5,000.00
57263 3/22/2006 006716 SO CA CITY CLERK ASSOC. 03212006 3/24 Mtq/lunch-B. Mesa
10-125-270-000-000 35.00
Total: 35.00
57264 3/27/2006 010340 . BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, PERS-CHApril, 2006 HEALTH INS B CORTES
10-110-142-000-000 408.59
Total : 408.59
57265 3/27/2006 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 03202006 Actuarial evaluation
10-190-220-000-000 400.00
Total 400.00
57266 3/27/2006 010614 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 03272006 1st Pmt-Sr. Housing Project
34-500-72.6-000-000 1,814,401.51
Total : 1,814,401.51
57267 3/28/2006 001907 COSTCO#478 0478 09 0050 1 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 94.54
10-440-220-000-000 115.06
Total : 209.60
57268 3/28/2006 010297 CHINO ICE 11944 8 Tons snow on 4/19/06
23-200-14-00 1,483.02
Total : 1,483.02
57269 3/28/2006 010323 ALL PET FEED &TACK 141 22 bales straw&del'y 4/19/06
23-200-14-00 179.40
Total : 179.40
57270 4/1/2006 007579 VARELA, CATALINA 04072006 Birthday Bonus
10-4407110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
Page: 3
vchlist V' Sher List
Page: 4
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57271 4/1/2006 010332 COLEMAN, ANGELA 04102006 Birthday Bonus
10-440-110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57272 4/1/2006 010620 RIDGEL, LYNETTE 04202006 Birthday Bonus
10440-110-000-000 60.00
Total : 50.00
57273 4/1/2006 005555 LUNSFORD,PATRICIA 04282006 Birthday Bonus
10-140-110-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57274 4/3/2006 001206 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION Feb. 2006. Feb.VISA Charges
23-200-14-00 61.51
10-110-270-000-000 59.64
10-120-270-000-000 59.64
10-140-210-000-000 163.65
10-180-245-000-000 28.96
10-180-272-000-000 705.13
10-190-2207000-000 61.70
10-380-249-000-000 45.10
32-200-210-000-000 17.95
47-100-250-001-000 239.45
Total : 1,442.73
57275 4/3/2006 006315 ROLLINS, RICHARD March, 2006 March Open/Close/Clean Parks
10-450-245-000-000 1,201.25
Total : 1,201.25
57276 . 4/5/2006 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PR end 3/10/06 Pmt for PR end 3/10/06
10-022-62-00 12,445.17
Total : 12,445.17
.57277 4/5/2006 010568 S.B. COUNTY TREASURER- 1167-231-01-W( 2005 Taxes-2nd Installment
34-700-767-000-000 674.68
Total : 674.68
57278. 4/13/2006 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW Mar. 2006 Mar..Planning Comm Stipend
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57278 4/13/2006 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW (Continued)
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57279 4/13/2006 001072 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 24874242 CHILD CARE MONITORING
10-440-247-000-000 375.00
Total : 375.00
57280 4/13/2006 010617 BARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY 030600832 Speed Bumps City Hall
10-180-706-000-000 359.76
Total : 359.76
57281 4/13/2006 010084 BIDNEY, ROBERT Mar. 2006 Mar. Planning Comm. Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57282 4/13/2006 010538 BRAUNSTEIN, ELLEN 32306 Mar 06 BMO Articles
10-180-255-000-000 300.00
Total : 300.00
57283 4/13/2006 001666 CA. MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC 42325 2006-07 Dues-Schwab & Ronnow
10-140-265-000-000 60.00
10-120-265-000-000 60.00
Total : 120.00
57284 4/13/2006 001739 CENTRAL CITY SIGN SERVICE 30376 Various Signs& nuts
16-900-220-000-000 359.89
Total : 359.89
57285 4/13/2006 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 7898191957603 Feb 06 Fuel chgs.
10-180-272-000-000 1,087.17
Total : 1,087.17
57286 4/13/2006 001840. COLTON, CITY OF 000603 ANIMAL CONTROL CODE ENFORCEMENT
10-190-256-000-000 3,291.66
Total : 3,291.66
57287 4/13/2006 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 142126 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
Page: 5
vchlist V`%;Fu;her List Pager 6
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57287 4/13/2006 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY (Continued)
10-450-245-000-000 388.00
Total : 388.00
57288 4/13/2006 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM Mar. 2006 Mar. Planning Comm.Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00,
Total : 50.00
57289 4/13/2006 010618 CREATIVE DYNOMITE 1287 Photoshop Training
10-180-268-000-000 375.00
Total : 375.60.
57290 4/13/2006 001662 . CSMFO 36721 2006 Membership dues
10-140-265-000-000. 100.00
Total : 100.00
57291 4/13/2006 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B938595 LEGAL PUBLICATION NOTICES
10-370-230-000-000 . 56.28
- B938595a PUBLIC HEARRING NOTICES-NEWSPAPER
10-370-230-0007000 210.32
Total : 266.60
57292 4/13/2006 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 17607 PARTING CITE PROCESSING
10-140-255-000-000 100.00
17744 PARTING CITE PROCESSING
10-140-255-000-000 100.00
Total : 200.00
57293 4/13/2006 010566 DEL HIERRO, RACHEL 031106 Mileage Reimbursement
10-440-271-000-000 14.24
Total : 14.24
57294 4/13/2006 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 016330/604235E SUPPLIES
10-450-246-0007000 18.43
22364/0042967 SUPPLIES
10-180-246-000-000 62.12
Total : 80.55
Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: . bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57295 4/13/2006 002082 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLIES. DO5785500001 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-221-000-000 242.38
10-440-221-000-000 . 18.78
Total : 261.16
57296 4/13/2006. 010615 DREAMSHAPERS 3332 4/27 Performance
23-200-14-00 200.00
Total 200.00
57297 4/13/2006 002165 . DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 6236 ON GOING WEED CONTROL AT CITY PARKS
107450-245-000-000 1,000.00
Total : 1,000.00
57298 4/13/2006 010610 ESMOND, STEVE 03212006 Refund of sec. dep-22293 Barton Rd
34-700-767-000-000 250.00
Total : 250.00
57299 4/13/2006 002280 EVER READY EMBROIDERY 031306 Jacket/Mari Montes
10-180-218-000-000 61.93
Total : 61.93
57300 4/13/2006 010537 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 1027 March 2006 Janitorial Supplies
10-180-255-000-000 188.78
929 JANITORIAL SERVICES
10-180-255-000-000 1,125.00
987 JANITORIAL SERVICES
10-180-255-000-000 1,125.00
Total : 2,438.78
57301 4/13/2006 002301 FEDEX 338536014 Delivery charges-Finance Dept,
10-140-210-000-000 36.19
Total : 36.19
57302 . 4/13/2006 002727 FREEMAN COMPANY, J R 323010-0 Office supplies
10-140-210-000-000 224.11
323013-0 PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-125-21.0-000-000 613.18
Page: 7
vchlist V ;u ;her List Page• 8
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57302 4/13/2006 002727 FREEMAN COMPANY, J R (Continued)
323013-1 PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES .
10-125-210-000-000 1.89
323243-0 PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-125-210-000-000 145.09
323246-0 3-mg binders
10-140-210-000-000 38.76
C323239-0 RETURN OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-140-210-000-000 -175.89
C323242-0 RETURN MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-125-210-000-000 -186.49
Total : 660.65
57303 4/13/2006 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 32078682 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 15.30
32078691 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 29.48
32078696 SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 4.31
32078706 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000. 66.35
32078713 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 71.39
32078755 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 21.17
32078756 SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 7.69
32078763 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 79.09
32078814 SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 56.81
Total : 351.59
57304 4/13/2006 003020 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORM COMPANY 83677 Crime Prev/uniform
14-411-223-000-000 48.39
Page: 8
vchlist Voucher List Page: 9
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM . CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57304 4/13/2006 003020 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORM COMPANY (Continued)
85064 Crime Prev/badges
14-411-223-000-000 6.23
Total : 54.62
57305 4/13/2006 010559 GST 495079 2/8 backup& printer install
10-140-255-000-000 190.00
495081 Feb & Mar Eden support
10=140-255-000-000 570.00
Total : 760.00
57306 4/13/2006 003213 HONEYWELL ACS SERVICE 3266346 Feb 06-March 06 CC/Senior Ctr
10-805-246-000-000 413.67
10-440-246-000-000 413.67
Total : 827.34
57307 4/13/2006 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 04360162-00 . LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 , 105.28
04367119-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 94.80
04372394-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 78.59
04372417-00 LANDSCAPE/MAINT SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 46.45
Total : 325.12
57308 4/13/2006 010619 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 032906 Class I Member dues-Shields
.10-172-265-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57309 4/13/2006 003747 J & M TROPHIES 38653 Peter Hills/Engraved Plate
10-110-220-000-000 16.16
Total : 16.16
57310 4/13/2006 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 44485 INTERNET WEBSITE HOSTING
10-180-255-000-000 170.00
- Page: 9
vchlist � �� � � � �
�iW'cher List Page: 10
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57310 4/13/2006 . 003800 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC (Continued) Total : 170.00
57311 4/13/2006 003850 JANI-KING LAX02060075 CLEANING SERVICES
34-400-246-000-000 150.00
Total : 150.00
57312 4/13/2006 010520 K&A ENGINEERING 5779 ENGINEERING SERVICES
10-370-255-000-000 2,090.00
Total : 2,090.00
57313 4/13/2006 003867 K. D. SALES 1.51321 Plumbing Supplies .
10-180-246-000-000 121.71
151344 Faucet&Supplies
10-180-246-000-000 273.04 ..
Total : 394.75
57314 4/13/2006 004302 LA PASTA ITALIA 12908 Ann. Budget wkshp dinner
10-190-220-000-000 100.00
Total : 100.00
57315 4/13/2006 004370 LELAND NURSERY 210598 PLANTS &SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 416.18
Total : 416.18
57316 4/13/2006 010599 LIGHTHOUSE PROMOTIONS & PLANNI 1005 G.T. DAYS EVENT PLANNING FEES
23-200-12-00 1,000.00
Total : 1,000.00
57317 4/13/2006 010611 MCNABOE, DARCY Mar. 2006 Mar. Planning Comm. Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57318 4/13/2006 004632 METLIFE 895065375M1 Ins. Benefit-Hugh J. Grant
10-110-142-000-000 701.98
Total : 701.98
57319 4/13/2006 004670 MIRACLE MILE CAR WASH 414868 CAR WASHES AND OIL CHANGES
Page: 10
vchlist Voucher List Page: 11
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57319 4/13/2006 004670 MIRACLE MILE CAR WASH (Continued)
10-180-272-000-000 5.00
10-440-272-000-000 127.85
Total : 132.85
57320 4/13/2006 010116 MONTANO, RUBEN 04042005 Reimburse computer payment
10-022-56-00 36.88
Total : 36.88
57321 4/13/2006 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025-042 Jan/Feb Cell Phones-Com Srvs
10-180-240-000-000 318.01
10-440-235-000-000 48.94
Total : 366.95
57322 4/13/2006 001456 OFFICE MAX-A BOISE COMPANY 077595 Office Supp-City Mngr Dept.
10-120-210-000-000 33.34
Total : 33.34
57323 4/13/2006 005435 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 6065422917-01 GT Days Prizes
23-200-12-00 495.01
Total : 495.01
57.324 4/13/2006 005450 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SAU06425V406 ELEVATOR MAINT
10-180-245-000-000 303.49
Total : 303.49
57.325 4/13/2006 010616 OVERLAND, PACIFIC &CUTLER INC 0602215 Feb 06 Town Center Project
23-301-95-00 2,351.25
Total : 2,351.25
57326 4/13/2006 005451 PAPA SB 5-10-06 MULLINS-PAPA SEMINAR
10-180-270-000-000 100.00
Total : 100.00
57327 4/13/2006 005586 PETTY CASH 040206 Reimburse C Care Petty Cash
} Page: 11
1 _
vchlist Voucher List
Page: 12
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice. Description/Account Amount
57327 4/13/2006 005586 PETTY CASH (Continued) .
10-440-220-000-000 53.29
10-440-221-000-000 39.50
10-440-223-000-000 80.50
10-440-228-000-000 121.10
Total : 294.39
57328 4/13/2006 005688 PROTECTION ONE 031306 Civic Center/Gym Alarm
10-180-247-000-000 84.00
3020955-4th Qtr ALARM MONITORING
10-172-246-000-000 23.25
10-175-246-000-000 23.25
34-400-246-000-000 43.50
30865992-4th Q ALARM MONITORING
10-805-245-000-000 105.00
Total : 279.00
57329 4/13/2006 005673 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 27768855-001 Forklift Rental
10-180-240-000-000 491.01
Total : 491.01
57330 4/13/2006 010171 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 3733 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND DAMAGE REPAIR
16-510-255-000-000 362.25
3734 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND DAMAGE REPAIR
16-510-255=000-000 369.00
Total : 731.25
57331 4/13/2006 006242 RIVCOMM LLC 100336 Maint truck radio service
10-180-272-000-000 167.61
Total : 167.61
57332 4/13/2006 006285 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO 2234 SEWER BILLING OUTSOURCE
21-572-255-000-000 1,569.29
Total : 1,569.29
57333 4/13/2006 0.06310 ROADRUNNER STORAGE 2957 Unit 20091 Apr Storage Unit 2009#109
10-140-241-000-000 89.00
Page: 12
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code :, bofa
Voucher Date. Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57333 4/13/2006 006310 ROADRUNNER STORAGE (Continued) Total : 89.00
57334 4/13/2006 006335 ROQUET PAVING INC. 0301-06 ASPHALT PATCH PLAYGROUND-PICO
10-450-245-000-000 850.00
0302-06A RAISE 6 MANHOLES
21-573-250-000-000 4,500.00
Total : 5,350.00
57335 4/13/2006 006365 S&S WORLDWIDE 5210256 C. CARE SUPPLIES
23-200-14-00' 70.81
Total : 70.81
57336 4/13/2006. 006453 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER 2070 BOOKING FEES
10-410-259-000-000 1,197.90
Total : 1,197.90
57337 4/13/2006 006505 S.B. COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2006-01 Fuel for Child Care bus/Sweeper
16-900-254-000-000 164.50
10-440-272-000-000 42.87
Total : 207.37
57338 4/13/2006 006430 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOC.GOV'T GADUES-06-09 Member dues 2005-2006
10-190-265-000-000 461.72
Total : 461.72
57339 4/13/2006 006435 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1226 ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
10-190-256-000-000 316.00
Total : 316.00
57340 4/13/2006 006721 SOUTHERN CA EDISON March 2006 March 2006
10-190-238-000-000 2,193.00
16-510-238-000-000 295.50
10-450-238-000-000 1,893.60
34-400-238-000-000 72.96
10-175-238-000-000 26.53
10-172-238-000-000 33.16
Total : 4,514.75
} Page: 13
vchlist V;i her List Page: 14
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date .Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57341 4/13/2006 006778 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 0786837002669, Misc. ofc. supp.-Bldg.&Sfty.
34-400-210-000-000 60.43
603070666 Planning Office Supplies
10-370-210-000-000 188.18
9160890286 Comm Srvs-Office Supplies
10-180-210-000-000 209.97
9161219366 Copy paper&office supplies
10-190-212-000-000 118.76
10-140-210-000-000. 11.63
10-190-212-000-000. 9.21
10-140-210-000-000 0.90
9161288274 Pastel Paper for Child Care
10-440-210-000-000 95.20
Total : 694.28
57342 4/13/2006 010447 STUDIO 33 PRODUCTIONS 4151 COUNCIL SOUND BOARD.REPAIR
10-180-245-000-000 1,000.00
Total : 1,000.00
57343 4/13/2006 010612 SULZMAN, WENDY 0222006. Park fee refund-party rain out
10-450-01 40.00
Total : 40.00
57344 4/13/2006 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 603150546. FOOD SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 587.42
603220628 FOOD SUPPLIES .
10-440-220-000-000 629.86
603220629 FOOD SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 36.27
Total : 1,253.55
57345 4/13/2006 010586 THE JAMIESON GROUP 2006.32 PROVIDE PROF. SRVS FY 05/06
10-370-2557000-000 4,150.00
Total : 4,160.00
57346 4/13/2006 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 577 TRAFFIC MITIGATION STUDY
11-500-255-000-000 620.00
Page: 14
vchlist Voucher List Page: 15
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57346 4/13/2006 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING (Continued)
577a TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
10-370-255-000-000 440.00
Total : 1,060.00
57347 , 4/13/2006 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 320060286 DIG ALERT MONTHLY SERVICE
16-900-220-000-000 44.80
Total : 44.80
57348 4/13/2006 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 2029062761 March 06 Charges
34-400-235-000-000 114.06
Total : 114.06
57349 4/13/2006 007880 WEST GROUP 811006339 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
10-125-250-000-000 141.70
Total : 141.70
57350 4/13/2006 007920 WILLDAN 062-8492 Eengineering Svr thru 2/24/06
10-172-250-000-000 427.50
Total : 427.50
57351 4/13/2006 007925 WILSON, DOUG Mar. 2006 Mar. Planning Comm Stipend
10-801-120-000-000 50.00
Total : 50.00
57352 4/13/2006 007938 WIRZ&COMPANY 44946 Business Cards-Mesa and Lampe
10-125-210-000-000 19.67
10-370-210-000-000 19.66
Total : 39.33
57353 4/13/2006 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 016546847 12/05-3/05 Usage/Print Charge
10-190-210-000-000 652.84
194533765 Staples for copier
10-190-210-000-000 92.67
Total : 745.51
57354 4/13/2006 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS February 2006 BOTTLED WATER SERVICES
Page: 15
i
vchlist Voucher List Page: 16
04/05/2006 2:20:44PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code : bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
57354 4/13/2006 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS (Continued)
10-190-238-000-000 .187.95
10-440-238-000-000 86.10
10-805-238-000-000 36.95
34-400-238-000-000 7.20
January 2006 BOTTLED WATER SERVICES
10-190-238-000-000 100.98
10-440-238-000-000 68.25
10-805-238-000-000 19.10
34-400-238-000-000 13.53
Total : 520.06
101 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 1,907,727.00
101 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1p907p727.00
I certify that, tbtc the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment
Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate for the operation of the:-,City' and Agency.
Larry R nnow, Fin nce Director
Page: 16
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT DISCUSSION MEETING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION
FEBRUARY 9, 2006
A special joint meeting the Colton Joint Unified School District Board of Education and the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the CJUSD Student Services Center,
Board Room, 851 South Mt.Vernon Avenue, Colton, California,on February 9,2006,at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT:
.City of Grand Terrace
Maryetta Ferre,Mayor
Bea Cortes, Mayor Pro Tem
Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember
Jim Miller, Councilmember
Tom Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
Richard Shields,Building& Safety Director
Gary Koontz, Community and Economic Development Director
Colton Joint Unified School District Board of Education
Mr. David Zamora, President
Mr. Robert D. Armenta, Jr., Vice President
Mr. Kent Taylor, Clerk
Mr. Mel Albiso
Mr. Mark Hoover
Mr. Frank A. Ibarra
Mrs. Marge Mendoza-Ware
CJUSD Staff Members
Mr. Dennis Byas
Mr. James Downs
Ms. Angelia Wyles
Mr. Casey Cridelich
Mrs. Alice Grundman
Mr. Rick Dischinger
Mr. Roger Kowalski
Mr. Brian Butler
Mr. Syed Hyder
Mrs. Julia Nichols
Mr. Rick Lerma
Mr. Michael Townsend
COUNCIL A,GENDA E tl -aA I V v
Council Minutes
February 9,2006
Page 2
Ms. Katie Orloff.
Mrs. Chris Estrada
The Special Joint Meeting between the Grand Terrace City Council and the Colton Joint Unified
School District Board of Education was opened, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance..
PUBLIC COMMENT
Patricia Farley, 12513 Michigan, stated that the residents of Grand Terrace do not all want
the new high school. She feels that those who are going to be directly affected by this high
school did not receive accurate and complete information about what is being proposed. She .
expressed her concern with the proposed stadium.and feels that those who will be affected
should have received personal letters.
William Kaminsky,expressed his concern with the EIR for the proposed New High School.
Ginger Wit, expressed concern that the old schools will be neglected. She is glad to see the
district is addressing math issues/test scores. She indicated that there is confusion among
teachers and parents regarding a buy back day on March Yd
Tobin Brinker, expressed concern regarding the drop out rate. r �.
DISCUSSION TOPICS
The following items were discussed between the Council and the Colton Joint Unified
School District Board of Education:
1. High School #3 - Presentation by Alice Grandman, Facilities Ddirector & Bob
Hensley,Architect
2. Discussion of Bid Regarding the 60/40 Percent Split on Relocation of 48"Waterline
to Meet the City of Riverside Requirement
3. Consideration of Shared Cost for School Resource Officers for High School and
Middle School
4. Traffic.Safety(around schools and parking lots)
5. Update on Colton High School Leadership Team
6. Advancement Via Individual Determination Program(AVID)
7. Eighth(8"') Grade Algebra Requirement
Council Minutes
February 9,2006
Page 3
The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m., until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which is scheduled
to be held on Thursday,February 23, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING- MARCH 9, 2006
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council
Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on March
9, 2006, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferr6, Mayor
Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember
Jim Miller, Councilmember
Tom Schwab, City Manager
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
Larry Ronnow, Finance Director
Gary Koontz, Community Development Director
Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director
Lt. Hector Guerra, Sheriffs Department
ABSENT: Bea Cortes, Mayor Pro Tem
John Harper, City Attorney
GOAL SETTING WORKSHOP-4:30 P.M. COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM
The City Council held a Goal Setting Workshop where they discussed the results of the City Wide
Prioritization Survey. Following comments from the public and Council Members,the following
list of priorities were established for 2006:
Economic Development
1. Town Center 9.6
2. Outdoors Adventure Center 9.4
3. Establishment of a High School 9.0
Public Safety
4..Increased SheriffiEs Patrol 9.0
5. Paramedic Tax for new Paramedic Program 6.4
Traffic
6. City Wide Traffic Mitigation Program 8.8
7. Surveillance cameras in parks 8.8
8. Speed Enforcement off main thoroughfares 8.6
9. Red light enforcement cameras 6.2
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 2
10. Redesigned City Website to include more public information 8.6
Infrastructure
11. Street°resurfacing/re-striping/new signs 8.2
12. 5 year infrastructure plan coordinating this with development 7.8
-' Community Services-
13..Expanding community Services-Recreation/Youth programs 7.2
14. Expanded/new library 7.0 .
15. Establish Graffiti Task Force 6.6
16. Community/Cultural Center 6.2
17. Access to Blue Mountain/Walking Trails/Parks 6.2
18. Park Improvements at Pico 6.0
19. Park Improvements at TJ Austin 6.0
20. Fire and police prevention programs 6.4
21."Install Traffic Feedback signs (You are going XX mph)
on Barton and Mt. Vernon using traffic mitigation funds . 6.4
22. Mixed use Development for commercial/retail areas
-New Urbanism 6.2
23. Update general plan 6.2
24. Commercial/Professional Business Attraction 6.0
25. Economic Sustainability Report using various growth/retail/
commercial models 5.8
26. Community Town Halls 5.6
27. Park development u Scenic Viewpoint
(Canal/Mt. Vernon NW Corner) 5.6
28. Welcome Banners on light poles (Blue Mountain City) 5.6
2.9. Promote GT as educated community High-Tech High School,
partnership with schools and library 5.6
30: Lighting of city entrances/monument signs 5.6
31. Establish GT as a retail center for the surrounding area 5.4
32.Development of our faith based community 4.8
33. Summer concert and farmer)Es market 4.6
34. Establish a dog park 4.2
35: Small business community forum 4.0
36. Town Hall.meeting for possible de-annexation of 27 parcels
in N/W Grand Terrace area 3.2
37. New city marketing brochures/campaign 3.0
-At home in Grand Terrace
-Business development center
The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Pastor Rick Doucette,Calvary the Brook
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 3
Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. .
ITEMS TO DELETE -None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS -None
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-2006-28 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
GARCIA, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES WAS ABSENT), to
approve the following Consent Calendar Items:
3A. Approve Check Register Dated March 9, 2006
3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
3C. Approval of 02-23-2006 Minutes
3D. Close of Escrow- 22874 Arliss
PUBLIC COMMENT
Laura Austin, 12356 Michigan,stated that at the last Council Meeting the Council approved
the sale and discharge of fireworks and questioned how they justified approving the sale and
discharge of fireworks street by street. She feels that the Council should re-think their
decision.
Virginia M.Ogawa, 12556 Michigan-Street,requested speed humps or a strong deterrent for
drivers that choose to speed down Michigan. She indicated that she e-mailed all of the
Council regarding her property which was damaged by a driver that lost control of his vehicle
and side swiped their vehicle then spun around broad sided the same vehicle. She stated that
she received.a response from Assistant.City Manager Berry that because Michigan is an
arterial connector road it would not be feasible to place speed bumps there. She stated that
they have had either their vehicles or their block wall hit three different times. Other
neighbors have had similar problems. She feels that this situation is only going.to get worse
and feels that the City needs to do something.
Pastor Rich Doucette, Calvary the Brook Church, announced that they will behaving their
Easter Sunrise Service again this year and how thankful that they are able to utilize the
Richard Rollins Park for the Service. Seven Churches have partnered in this service and they
are very excited about it. Everyone is invited to come.
Elizabeth Duarte, 22235 Mavis Street, indicated that she is the President of the Grand.
Terrace Woman's Club this year and as the Council is aware the Woman's Club has been
serving the Community for over 95 years. She indicated that the.club has been finger-
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 4
printing the children free of charge every year at the Grand Terrace Days Fair'and now they
have been informed that they will be charged $25.00 to participate. They feel that this is
unfair and are asking the Council to waive this charge. They also feel that there is an
injustice to many of the other service clubs and non-profit organizations in the City that are
trying to make a better community for our residents to live in. She expressed her concern
with the VIP tent that is available for those who make large donations.
Bill Hays, 22114 DeBerry, expressed his condolences to Barney Karger and his family for
the loss of his wife. He read the following:
For.the third time. What is the source of the$24,000,000 budget?. I have asked this question
now three times of Mr. Schwab and he keeps saying there is no $24,000,000 budget. Mr.
Schwab keeps answering a question I didn't ask and is not answering the one I did. I submit
an article from the Press Enterprise by Paul LaRocco, dated May 13, 2005.. I draw your
attention to the chart to the right of the article. Revenues$17.5 million, expenditures$21.5
million, deficit taken from reserve fund$4 million. So Mr. Schwab is right. It's not a$24
million.dollar budget;it's a 25.5 million dollar budget..Mr.LaRocco informed me not only
did he attend the budget meeting where Mr. Schwab put forth this budget,but Mr.LaRocco
got his figures from the budget book that was there for inspection. I also submit the quote
from the Staff Report minutes of January 26,2006 where Mr.Schwab states that he believes
- the FY 05-06 is $24 million because of capital expenditures. So Mr. Schwab's argument is
not with me, it's with himself. Now then what is the source of the$24,000,000 budget?.
Mr.Schwab said at a recent Council meeting that,"we have letters of intent from Lowes and
Staters." I presumed that when he said"We"he meant the City. Not so. He was referring
to Mr. Jacobsen and himself. I requested copies of the intent letters and was informed by.
Mrs. Mesa that the City does not have them. Mr. Jacobsen does. If Mr. Schwab does not.
have them he should not present them at Council and to the public that he does. If they exist
Mr: Schwab should be able to prove it. In the San Bernardino Sun article by Steve Wall last
Sunday,Mr.Jacobsen claimed he had long term leases with Lowes and Staters for the Town
Center. I would like to know if any of the Council members have seen them and if not Mr.
Jacobsen should be asked to prove his claims to the community. Councilmember Garcia
accepted the maximum allowed by law in campaign contributions from Mr.Jacobsen and his
wife. I respectfully request Councilwoman Garcia recuse herself from any further
involvement in discussion or negotiations with Jacobsen Family Holding on any projects in
Grand Terrace. Also,because Mrs. Ferre is the only Council Member that will not list who
contributed to her campaign,will she answer did Jacobsen or any other entity with business
before the Council contribute to her campaign. Last. What CHUTZPAH! The fireworks
ordinance. . What about equality under the law. The ad-hock committee made
recommendations that there be two "No Discharge Zones". One where the majority of the
Council live and the other where the member of the ad-hock committee member lives. Then
Mr. Phelps who was also on the Committee is appointed to the Planning Commission,I'm
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 5
not the only one that feels this looks like a pay off for making the recommendations to
exclude your homes from the free fire zone the rest of us must endure. I had to fight a field
fire last year from fireworks when I was put on hold by the Fire Dept. Had not the Fire Dept
got there when they did there would have been property damage. What makes us, the
unwashed huddled masses,homes less susceptible to fire than your homes? You will have
additional deputies to enforce an unenforceable ordinance except where it is enforceable.
In Honey Hills and on Grand Terrace Road where no fireworks will be. allowed. This
demonstrates some of the Councils attitude toward any resident that is not in their circle of
friends or is not a member of the social clubs.
Don Larkin, 12168 Mt.Vernon Avenue#89, stated that in November the City will have the
direct election of its Mayor. He feels that the City Code needs to be looked and clearly
designate the responsibilities of the Mayor and how it will work. He believes that a
committee was created to look at these issues and he hasn't heard of anything to date. He
feels that the clock is ticking and that it would be a benefit to the City and to the Public and
for those who are considering running for the position to have a clear understanding of what
those responsibilities and duties will be. He feels that this should be included in the goals
for the Council for the upcoming year.
City Manager Schwab,responded that the fireworks recommendations that were made by the
committee were exactly that. In order for staff to put those into law we are going to be
required to amend the current fireworks ordinance and bring that back to City Council for.
approval. It would be appropriate if someone wished to talk about the exclusion zones and
will be given the opportunity during the public hearing process. He did see the letter from
Mrs. Ogawa regarding the speed issues on Michigan. Our Traffic Engineer does say that
collector streets.should not have speed humps, however, he has noticed in the City of
Riverside there are some streets that he would consider collector streets that have speed
humps that you could take at 30 mph. He would recommend that if there is a citizens
committee formed or someone to study the recommendations that they look at potentially
placing some sort of speed control there including a hump. There could be mitigated
circumstances that could possibly allow for that. He had a discussion with a couple of
members of the Council with regards to the $25.00 fee for Grand Terrace Days and stated
that if the Council would like to waive the fees that is something that staff can and will do. .
He stated that he will provide in writing the source of funding for the budget that Mr. Hays
is requesting,with a copy to the Council. He stated that there are letters of intent with Staters
and Lowes and he has seen those letters and has met with the real estate people from Lowes
and Stater Bros where they indicated that those items were negotiated, however, the
developer has no desire to have a lease that he has negotiated with a company be a public
document, therefore, he has not provided to him nor has he asked to have that document
given to us to be kept in our records. He feels that this item is confidential. On March 23,
2006 when the potential developers of the Town Square Site come forward to discuss their
qualifications and their tenants that might be an appropriate time for the Council to ask them
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 6
to provide copies of letters of intent and or lease documents. Mr. Larkin's comments have
not been forgotten by the Council. Last year Council.did appoint an ad-hoc committee to
study Council procedures. The Committee has met several times and have changed the
Council Procedures and will have a recommendation back to the Council either at the last
meeting.in April or the first meeting in May.
ORAL REPORTS
5A: Committee Reports -None
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Hilkey, questioned if staff has done anything with the complaints about
Swertfeger Equipment.
City Manager Schwab, stated that he was asked to provide a history of that business to the
Council. He has received from the Planning.Department,.a week ago, a chronology of
everything that has happened on that site since we have been a City. He is currently
reviewing it and should have it to the Council the first part of next week for their review..
Councilmember Garcia, highly recommends the sunrise service that will be held. Even if
you attend another church it really is a beautiful experience. The Blue Waves Swim Program
will begin June 19,2006 as well as open swim. The Super Heroes are coming June 3,2006'
to Grand Terrace Days. She encouraged everyone to participate,in the Super Hero contest.
She reported that you can become a lifetime member of the Friends of the Library for$75.00.
The library offers both story times and grandparents and books and encouraged people to
take advantage of the programs. She reported that on March 19`h Elizabeth Cox who is a well
known local author will be doing a book signing from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. She thanked all of
the residents and Council for attending the Goal Setting Meeting.
Councilmember Miller,suggested looking into placing a questionnaire on the website where
the residents can rank what their priorities are. He would like to see the Grand Terrace Days
fees waived for the service groups and non-profit organizations in Grand Terrace.
It was the concensus of the Council to waive the Grand.Terrace Days fees for service groups
and non-profit organizations in Grand Terrace.,
i
Councilmember Miller, stated that he has been contacted by a few members of the Colton
City Council regarding the annexation of the 27 parcels and requested an update from staff.
City Manager Schwab, stated that the City received a request from the City of Colton to
consider de-annexing a portion of Grand Terrace on the other side of La Cadena. There are
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 7
approximately 22 parcels. A letter was sent out asking for their feedback to the 22 lots.Eight
comments were received. Of the 8 comments 7 of the residents stated that they enjoyed
being in Grand Terrace and would like to be left alone. One lady that lives on La Cadena
said she didn't care if she lived in Colton or Grand Terrace if she could get the street
improvements on La Cadena. He sent a letter to the Council reporting that and questioned
if they wanted staff to do anything further. He hasn't heard that the Council wants to proceed
with the de-annexation.
Councilmember Miller, said that he would be willing to do a Town Hall meeting with those
individuals to go through it with them. We need to do what is best for the residents and the
City..
Mayor Ferris,would like to see staff bring something to the Council.
Councilmember Hilkey,stated that he doesn't want to see staff spend time on something that
doesn't benefit the residents of Grand Terrace.
City Manager Schwab,stated that their primary motivation for wanting to annex that portion
of the City is to do the road repairs on La Cadena.
Mayor Ferre,reported that she attended the City-Selection Committee Meeting on March 1,
2006. Chair, William Alexander, Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga, Vice-Chair, Pat Morris,
Mayor San Bernardino,Primary Member for the LAFCO is Larry Callin, City of Highland
Alternate Member Diane Williams,Rancho Cucamonga. She expressed her appreciation for
the Seniors address and phone book. She requested some history of the fees for Grand
Terrace Days.
Assistant City Manger Berry, stated that they began planning Grand Terrace Days back in
December. They invite the Grand Terrace Seniors,Riverside Highland Water Co.,The Lions
Club,The Brook, Citizen's Patrol, Sheriffs Department, Soccer League,Little League and
the Woman's Club. The Committee works together to come up with a theme. They have
had four meetings where they discuss fees, costs, budgets, etc. The challenge was that the
Woman's Club has not been present until the last meeting. The fees came from the
committee not staff.
Mayor Ferr6, she expressed her appreciation for the work that Assistant City Manager Berry
does on Grand Terrace Days and is looking forward to it.
PUBLIC HEARING
6A. Specific Plan No. 05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM-
05-03/County No. 17766) and Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21)to
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 8
construct a 35 single family condominium development
Ordinance of the City Council Approving Specific Plan No. 05-02.(SP-05-02) for a
condominium subdivision with 35 single family detached units on a 3.7 acre site
located on the westerly side ofMt.Vernon Avenue at 11830 Mt.Vernon Avenue and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21)Mitigated Negative Declaration
as Provided by the California Environmental Quality Act
Resolution of the City of Grand Terrace Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03
(TTM 17766)for a 35 Single Family Residential Condominium Development in the
City of Grand Terrace
John Lampe,Planner, stated that the first public hearing for this project was held on
January 26,2006 and was continued to a future Council meeting in order to allow the
staff to work with the applicants to address several concerns raised at the public
hearing. These concerns consisted of the following items:
1. Traffic Study
2. Wood Fences vs. block walls on the perimeter of the project
3. Need for more open space and recreation facilities
4. On-street parking problems
5. Off-site drainage through the Highlands apartments
6. Need for a lighting plan
Staff met with the applicants on two occasions following the January 26`'meeting and
has also contacted the City's Traffic Engineer who responded in writing as to the necessity
for a traffic study.
The City's Traffic Engineer indicated in a memorandum dated February 13, 2006 that "a
traffic impact analysis is not required" even taking into consideration the number of
bedrooms proposed.
The applicants have indicated that they are proposing a 5 foot high,white vinyl fence on the
perimeter of the site. In some locations, this vinyl fence will be located on top of a block
retaining wall. The applicants have indicated that they feel the white vinyl fence will break-
up the appearance and height of the perimeter retaining wall and fencing, especially along
the southerly boundary of the project where the retaining wall and fencing will have an j
average height of about 10 feet.
The applicants have prepared a detailed plan showing a"tot lot"for the open space area in
the middle of the development.
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 9
The amount of parking provided for this development will greatly exceed the amount of
parking required by the City's Zoning Code. Each unit will have two spaces in a garage and
two additional open parking spaces in front of the garage. In addition, there are two open
parking areas on the north side of the interior island area,near the open recreation area, and
on the east side of this interior island area. This parking will serve the needs of guest or
visitor parking. The amount of parking required under the code is 79;this project has 158
spaces, twice what is required. '
The City Engineer is satisfied with the proposed drainage system and the applicant's engineer
will discuss in detail how the system will work.
The applicants have provided staff with a lighting plan for the development showing that
there will be five (5) lighting standards distributed throughout the development around the
middle island. In addition, one of the conditions of approval for the Site and Architectural
Review requires the submittal of an exterior lighting plan. Staff feels that this will be an
adequate number of lighting standards to provide interior lighting to the project.
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the
Ordinance for the Adoption of Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the Resolution of Approval for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map no. 05-03 (County No. 17766).
Walter Eaves, Greystone Group, indicated that they have been working with Gary Koontz
and Staff for quite some time and performed a very comprehensive specific plan that has
been presented to Council. He feels that they have studied all of the concerns that were
raised at the last meeting and feels that they have come up with some good solutions and
hopes that they have responded to them appropriately. They feel that it is an excellent plan
and will take a piece of property that needs to be redeveloped from its current state and will
create some really nice homes.
Scott Adams&John Olivier, did a power point presentation on the proposed project.
Councilmember Hilkey,expressed his concern with the fencing,the lighting and the shared
use of the sewerage and drainage of the project.
Walter Eeds,responded that the lighting issues can be corrected and that he doesn't see any
issues arising with the sharing of the sewerage and drainage with the neighboring.property.
GaryKoontz,Community and Econommic Development Director,stated that no matter what
type of project goes on this piece of land it will have the same type of grading situation and
the same height of walls to make any sort of pads work on this project.
Rich Shields, this particular portion was designated for multi-family homes. All of the
infrastructure is the correct size and he doesn't have a problem with the shared use.
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 10
John Olivier, explained how the sewer system will work.
Councilmember Garcia, expressed her concern with the fencing. She indicated that she is
concerned that having a large fence on Mt. Vernon would create an area for graffiti. She.
requested clarification on the types of products that will be used.
Walter Eaves, explained the type of product that will be used and described the landscaping
-1 that will be a buffer for the fencing.
John Olivea, described the property and how the fencing will work. .He doesn't feel as
though you will see a large fence when driving down Mt.Vernon. He stated that unless.you
stand on the sidewalk and look down you probably won't see.the entire height of the fence.
Scott Adams,indicated that they have prepared a landscaping plan that would be harmonious
with the surrounding area. He stated that they would work with staff to make sure that it is
integrated.
Councilmember Garcia, stated that safety is very important and that she has some concerns
with the lighting plan.
Scott Adams, stated that they will have a lighting plan that is safe for everyone concerned.
Councilmember Garcia, expressed some concern with the access of the property.
Scott Adams,responded that he feels that the access is adequate for the number of units that
are proposed.
Councilmember Miller, referred to the fencing at the Highlands and questioned what the
continuing line would look like with the new project.
Walter Eaves,responded that it would be a split face block wall with stucco finish facing Mt.
Vernon to provide sound and privacy barriers and the layering of landscaping along the
street.
Councilmember Miller, stated that he would like to see the fencing coordinated with the
fencing at the Highland Apartments. He thanked the developer for including the playground
equipment. He questioned what the ratio of children is in some of the other projects that they ,
have done like the proposed project.
Walter Eaves, stated that they can't predict those type of numbers but they are looking for
a combination of buyers.
Councilmember Miller, questioned what they are looking at marketing these homes at.
Council Minutes
March 9.,2006
Page 11
Walter Eaves, probably from$450,000 to the $500,000 range.
Councilmember Miller, questioned how the on street parking will be addressed.
Walter Eaves, CC&R's or the HOA will have a condition that is included that will not allow
on street parking.
Councilmember Miller, questioned who would maintain the HOA.
Walter Eaves, responded that once all of the homes are sold it would be run by the home
owners themself that are on an elected board and they would higher an independent property
management company to manage the HOA.
Councilmember Hilkey, questioned how water gets into the underground basin.
John Olivea, explained the process.
Councilmember Hilkee , expressed his concern again with the fencing and the way the
developer is responding to the questions of Council.
Mayor Ferr6,opened the discussion to the public,there being none, she returned discussion
to the Council.
Councilmember Garcia, indicated that she would like to see this project come back so that
they have an opportunity to address the issues that the Council has brought up. She would
like to see real pictures so that they get a good.visual of how it will look. She would like to
see a better visual on the fencing on Mt. Vernon and around the project. She would like to
see the visual from their project perspective and from the Highlands-.
Councilmember Miller, stated that they need to look at the continuation of the wall from the
Highlands and the possibility of graffiti on a block wall.
Mayor Ferr6,confirmed that the wall will be harmonious with the Highlands that will be set
back and landscaped.
Scott Adams, responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Miller, stated that the fencing will not be the same as the fencing that
surrounds the Highlands.
Walter Eaves, stated that they can do whatever type of fencing that the Council would like.
Fencing is a design issue.
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 12
Mayor Ferr6, comfortable with the recommendations of the Planning Commission
CC-2006-29 MOTIONBY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER,CARRIED 3-1-1-0(MAYOR FERRE VOTED NO AND MAYOR PRO
TEM CORTES WAS ABSENT) to continue Specific Plan No. 05-02,(SP-05-02),
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766) and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21) to construct a 35 single family
condominium development and an Ordinance ofthe City Council Approving Specific
Plan No. 05-02 (SP-05-02) for a condominium subdivision with 35 single family
detached units on a 3.7 acre site located on the westerly side of Mt.Vernon Avenue
at 11830 Mt.Vernon Avenue and Environmental Review Case No.05-21 (E-05-21)
Mitigated Negative Declaration as Provided by the California Environmental Quality
Act and a Resolution of the.City of Grand Terrace Approving Tentative Tract.Map
No. 05-03 (TTM 17766) fora 35 Single Family Residential Condominium
Development in the City of Grand Terrace to April 13,2006 so that the developer can
bring back better visualization and address some of the suggestions that have been
made.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Circulation Prioritization Study Findings and Recommendations
CC-2006-30 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY,SECOND BY COUNCILMEM 3ER
MILLER, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES WAS ABSENT), to
form an ad-hoc committee with each Councilmember appointing two individuals
city-wide and appoint Councilmember Jim Miller to represent the Council to
implement the recommendations of the Traffic Engineer and advise the Council on
additional traffic mitigation measure that may.help.
.8B. Mid-Year Budget Adjustments Fiscal Year 2005-2006
CC-2006-31 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
GARCIA, CARRIED 3-0-2-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM CORTES AND
COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY WERE ABSENT), to approve Revenue and
Appropriation Adjustments to the FY 2005-2006 City Budget as follows:
i
FY05-06 Revenue Adjustments
10-200-13, Booking Fees Reimbursement- ($17,536)
11-300-02, Traffic Congestion Relief Funds, AB2928 - $25,143.62
47-100-01, Measure I Match Funding For Barton Bridge.Replacement- $2,400
Council Minutes
March 9,2006
Page 13
47-100-02, Colton Match Funding- $2,400
47-100-03,Federal Grant Funding- $19,200
FY05-06 Appropriation Adjustments:
20-999-999, Transfer to Fund 47 Barton Bridge Replacement Project- $2,400
47-100-250-3, Right of Way Acquisition, Barton Bridge Replacement- $24,000
10-450-245, Rollins Park Maintenance- $6,000
10-440-245, Child Care Center Bathroom Repair Deductible - $5,000
10-180-255, Civic Center Cleaning Services - $10,000
10-450-246, Unanticipated Major Parks Mower Repairs - $4,000 .
10-190-721, City Hall Parking Lot Lighting Improvements - $4,210
10-190-256, Animal Control Program- $4,500
21-573-713,Additional NPDES/Corporation Yard Cost Increases - $44,799
And to approve Option A For the La Cadena Road Improvements which is 115,000
sq. ft. of 1 %2 inch overlay with head grinders on connecting streets. Total=$95,000
to $115,000 (bid estimate)
8C. Schedule Budget Hearing Dates for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Preliminary Budget
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule the Budget Hearing Date for Fiscal Year
2006-2007 Preliminary Budget for May 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION-None
Mayor Ferr6 adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m.,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting which
is scheduled to be held on Thursday, March 23, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
�ITy
ROND TER R C
Community Services Department
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: April 13,2006
SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT REQUESTED BY CALVARY, THE BROOK FOR THE
USE OF ROLLINS PARK FOR A SUNRISE SERVICE AND EASTER EXPERIENCE ON
4 SUNDAY, APRIL 16, 2006
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
BACKGROUND:
Grand Terrace Municipal.Code.
8.50.020 Special Events Permit.
All special events occurring on property within the city, other than that property specified
in Section 8.50.010 of this chapter,shall be prohibited unless a properly issued special
events permit has first been obtained. As here-in-after mentioned in this chapter"special
events"means any assembly, congregation, attraction, display, entertainment,
demonstration, carnival,bazaar, circus,rodeo, or other traveling show, fair, festival, food
faire, cook-off, dance, concert or performance, or any other planned occurrence that'may
attract a large number of people or which may otherwise become a hazard to the public
peace, health, safety or general welfare.
All applications for street or special events permits must be on file with the city sixty days
before the scheduled event unless a waiver is granted by the city council.
The city shall either approve or deny the application within thirty days of the date the
completed application is filed.
Discussion
Calvary, The Brook, a Christian Church based in Grand Terrace is requesting a special
events permit for their Easter Service and Easter Experience scheduled for Sunday, April i.
16, 2006 at Rollins Park. The Easter Experience will take place on field 1 (City property)
and the Easier Service will take place on field 2 (Colton Unified School District
property).
The Brook will use the City's snack bar, restrooms,parking lot, and playground area in
addition to field 1 for this activity. The Brook will be responsible for'all clean up on both
fields and city facilities.
The City is incurring no costs for this event.
Attendees will park along De Berry, in the Rollins Park parking lot, and in the
surrounding streets. The Brook will place door hangers on the residences in the
surrounding park area notifying them of this event.
Staff has met with the representatives from the Brook to review their requests and advise
them on the City's requirements for the permit.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends approval of the special events permit for Calvary, the Brook's Easter
Service and Easter Experience scheduled for Sunday, April 16, 2006 at Rollins Park.
ROOD TERR C
Community Services Department
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2006
CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X)
SUBJECT: REDLINING CURBING ON THE WEST SIDE OF 12210 MICHIGAN
IN FRONT OF PARK CENTER BUSINESS PARK
NO FUNDING REQUIRED (X)
BACKGROUND
The City of Grand Terrace received several complaints over the past few months regarding vehicles
parking near the entrance and exit driveways of the Park Center business complex located at 12210
Michigan. The parked vehicles on Michigan---which include trucks---are obstructing the views of
vehicles exiting the business park.
Please see the attached map for specific details.
The City's Traffic Engineer reviewed the situation and agreed that red striping needs to added on the west
side of Michigan from 50 feet north of the first driveway to the end of the curb south of the business park
frontage, approximately 135 feet. This leaves 200 feet of parking space from Commerce south to the red
zone.
Richard Helmuth, the property manager, was sent a letter on February 8, 2005 requesting permission to
red-line the curb. In a letter dated February 16, 2005, the Park Center Management gave the city
approval(letter attached)to red-line the entrance to the property as described in the letter
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL TO ALLOW THE CITY MAINTENANCE STAFF TO PAINT A
RED ZONE WITH A TOTAL COMBINED LENGTH OF 135 FT. FROM 50 FEET NORTH OF THE
FIRST DRIVEWAY TO THE END OF THE CURB SOUTH OF THE BUSINESS PARK FRONTAGE.
r.
FR ; .: RICHARD_HELMUTH FAX NO. 714 557 4152 Feb. 16 2006 02:56PM P1
PARK CENTER
12210 MICHIGAN AVE. GRAND'TERRACE, CA.
February 16, 2006 '-
Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand terrace, Ca, 92313 via fax (909) 783-2600.
2 pages total
Re: Curb painting at 12210 Michigan St.
Dear Mr. Berry,
Responding to the letter dated February 8, 2006 by Ms. Berrie Owens. The
property owners have no objection to painting portions of the curb red.
We would like however, for you to consider leaving some of our street front curb
not painted. A few of our Tenants have customers with long truck trailers who
cannot park in our very tight parking lot and must park on Michigan Street,
Allowing them to park as close to our property as possible and consistent with your
concerns for traffic safety would help. Would painting the first 20 feet on either
side of both driveways accomplish both of our objectives?
Thank you for your consideration and please call to discuss.
Yours truly,
Richard much
Property Manager
I ! '�` " � a �++ r��� .A'���� "� y��.TW �`.'p'�' ����`�i� r •r7' �S;C �! \ �.i �s "�� ,�,. '
! ::(,�}/y; ,uy",�+' �,P .�ja�3k.R.'�; 1 �;3 R lKt X •� - � '� T, I�•'� ? �: •.:•A. ;�. ' �3 •'%,yls!'��'�!1Tr �, t•o.�h -1 ;� ti �• �'� �S-. K ,'.��,ux:.;�+ ',ry. �a
A I
'j K 5tlysa' i;t i (`. F`� S �F *"t�,} - . .r � �''.:,y:..-' +f- ��r �•�f k
�.� -•i. � �• r a r,�{�T. � k '" _` yrfii6.',#�t I)'� y� �� t_ 1 yAkio fu
Iy�
—of"'� �s I _ �t+� _1•ig�'���''��.,• - �!" ,� i �`.h4 k ^'F��?G l �< } t S,•Y'e y k IG'r C.�+Z.�.
xi
.174
fi . r j f 1 *► Sys ro
,, j�fR J .1 '� •�� � �, �
.AA OR S
SC
,{�` s }.� n �" no- ,'3� .. •+.
■ !y/ r J 1FrOf
iL
It AN-
ww
s r.• .c '
4
i•, �' ..� is"'A �. ,S 4 ;�, n� :}• � �'� ':' � t' i.r:
Et :.,y < !�i� t.■ T �. � .,i :.*f .d•.4{ � �2 A r�'•k `r�.+ 1. {' 4.��
SIT y
RAND TERR C
Community Services Department
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2006
CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X)
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO USE CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT
EQUIPMENT PROGRAM (CLEEP) FUNDING FOR SURVELLIANCE
CAMERA PURCHASES
FUNDING REQUIRED M
BACKGROUND
The City has a current CLEEP balance of$57,.451.
Staff is requesting up to$14,500 for three surveillance systems totaling sixteen cameras to be deployed at
Pico and Rollins Park and the Childcare Center. The systems would include:
• 200 GIG hard drive for video recapture (up to 20 days storage) at each site
• Day/night cameras in vandal proof domes (where needed)
• 17" monitor with keyboard and mouse.
• All cabling and installation
• Signage
• 1 year warranty—parts and labor
• Additional service warranty @$20 per month per site after the first year covering all parts and
labor
Staff received two bids for the project and is recommending HighTech Security Systems of San
Bernardino.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving up to $14,500 in CLEEP funding to install three surveillance systems
totaling sixteen cameras to be deployed at Pico and Rollins Park and the Childcare Center
E 7 E'z`-] �,]Oj
I _
STAFF REPORT
GRONDTERR CE City Manager's Office
CRA ITEM Q COUNCIL ITEM (X)
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2006
SUBJECT: COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER- MEETING ATTENDANCE
LEGISLATIVE ACTION DAYS, SACRAMENTO, MAY 17 & 189
2006
FUNDING REQUIRED (X)
NO FUNDING REQUIRED ()
The League of California Cities, Legislative Action Days, will be held this year
May 17-18, in Sacramento, CA. Staff is requesting travel authorization for the Council
Members and City Manager to attend this conference. Funding for this travel is in the
budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE COUNCIL
MEMBERS AND CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA
CITIES, LEGISLATIVE ACTION DAYS, MAY 17 & 18, 2006, IN SACRAMENTO,
CA.
i
,� C�O® �.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION
DAYS
Wednesday, May 17— Thursday, May 18, 2006
Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel
Be part of the League's annual Legislative Action Days at the state Capitol. Join hundreds of
local elected officials and appointed leaders from around the state to urge Legislators to protect
our local services. Together with our colleagues,we will succeed in preserving and expanding
local authority and responsibility.
Plan to have an influential delegation attend and carry the message clearly and emphatically.
Bring your elected leaders,public safety leaders,business leaders and community leaders to
demonstrate the broad support for protecting funding for locally delivered programs and services.
Help get the public attention needed to preserve local services by being part of this impressive
conference. Meet one-on-one with legislators in their Capitol offices.
s r
y Ad�ancec� Reisraion Ts Free
_ Y Register B �Wednesday�11ylay�0,�04r x
l X fh�r�#e regr�s zr tt e, 1p
STAFF REPORT
COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: '
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR DRAGOS BARBU,THE MIS SPECIALIST, TO
ATTEND INTEROP IN NEVADA,MAY Oil-05, 2001.
At INTEROP will be presented the latest security technologies as firewalls,intrusion
detection..and prevention.systems,network admission control,VPNs, authentication,
identity management tools,ANTISPAM and antispyware.
Staff is requesting authorization to attend. Funds have been budgeted for this purpose.
Staff Recommends Council: .
AUTHORIZE THE MIS SPECIALIST TO ATTEND INTEROP IN NEVADA, MAY
01-05,2006.
:gym
Home»Exposition
Exposition - Open to All Attendees
See the latest solutions all in one place. Get the big picture by meeting face-to-face with
i_ndustry.-leadng._com,paRM.
Zero in on technologies throughout the Exhibition Floor:
Performance.Pavilion.Start Up City
Performance.Zone. .-VoI_P_Zone
SSL-VPN..Pa_A.UQu wireless Zone
Secu_ri..y_
.t _Zone. -...-------------
Performance Pavilion
Discover the latest performance strategies, technologies, and solutions.in an-open, multi-vendor
arena.
Performance Zone
Get a firsthand look at technologies and services like bandwidth shaping, acceleration, caching,
off-load engines, load testing, network management, XML processing, infrastructure optimization
and application management.
SSL VPN Pavilion
Explore the most pressing remote access issues, and how to address them from both a technical
and business perspective. The SSL VPN Theater will host educational presentations on the latest
advances in this fast-growing market.
Security Zone
See the latest security technologies and services such as firewalls, intrusion detection and
prevention systems, network admission control, VPNs, authentication, identity management tools,.
policy, risk.management, forensics and incident response, antispam and antispyware.
Start Up City
Meet the newest entrants to the IT marketplace, and try out their groundbreaking products and
services.
Vo1P Zone
Explore the products and technologies that lay the groundwork for IP networks to carry future
generations of voice and other real-time traffic, in conjunction with devices and applications that
are not traditionally thought of as voice-centric. Meet with the vendors who will help you
understand how your company can transition from TDM-to IP-based voice systems within the
context of the enterprise network as a whole.
Wireless Zone
See the latest wireless technologies and services. Help your company increase productivity and
efficiency by enabling real-time exchange of information within an increasingly distributed and
mobile workforce. Compare technologies and vendors to help you choose the right devices and
.platforms to future proof your mobile technology investment and ensure a successful roll-out.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REPEIVED
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE n�`� ��$ 1006
Regular Meeting
MINUTES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
February 7, 2006 CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by
Chairperson, Vic Pfennighausen at 6:01 p.m. Agendas were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT—JoAnn Johnson, Vic Pfennighausen, Debra Hurst, Susan Taylor, Glenn
Nichols, Rich Haubert and Lew Neeb.
MEMBERS ABSENT—Dottie Rabom.
CITY STAFF—Assistant City Manager, Steve Berry. Liaison, Dragos Barbu checked in briefly.
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS—Mayor, Maryetta Ferre', Randy Halseth, Renae
Marticorena and Jim Vert. Introductions were made all around.
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS —None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vic added item 6. e. Work and 8. b. Budget 06-07. Then motion by
Debra Hurst and second by Susan Taylor.
I APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 3. 2006 Motion by Debra Hurst and second by Susan
Taylor.
LIAISON REPORT by Steve Berry
a. Distribution of copies of newspaper article on 1918 Spanish flu pandemic.
b. Steve will attend a three day,training session in March at Pacific Grove on Hazardous
situations.
c. Vic thanked Steve for updating both the City and County Emergency Operations books.
d. Now looking at April 261h instead of 19`h for city exercises. This date may change again.
e. Staff has been identified for these exercises although this list could also be changed.
f. Brochures with emergency procedures and identification cards are available in Riverside
that would be nice if we could duplicate them. Susan will research on internet and also
JoAnn has been looking into it. They were made specifically for Riverside County.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
a. Fabric has been purchased for vests for EOC activation/exercises. Colors are coordinated
with stations. Susan will follow up with tailor who will make one vest for approval and if
satisfactory, the rest will be made.
b. Question of how to do the lettering on the back. Steve mentioned that Ever Ready
Embroidery should be checked out.
c. Vic indicated that the back lot had been nicely finished and that the storage containers
had been moved back and items moved back in.
d. Mike Mullins went through some cross training with Vic.
e. Susan worked with Vic on February 3'd . Cards and badges were updated and colors
were corrected.
f. Vic talked to the county and will be receiving updated lists of the county people.
g. Updated confidential.list of staff home addresses and phones for emergency purposes
is on disc with lap top.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Vic said that the February CERT training was filled. Next training will be in June at
Rialto Fire Department and he will try for at least some of the committee to attend. More
information later.
b. Request for 2"d and 3rd Alternate committee positions was made and accepted by
Council.
c. The application of Lewis Neeb as Alternate committee member was also accepted by
Council.
NEW BUSINESS
a. Steve told us about the new fire truck in Grand Terrace, which is a Brush Truck.
b. Grand Terrace Days will be June 3rd and it would be good if we could high-light the
Emergency Operations with a good spot and good informational hand outs.
c. Vic needs more help in the EOC and will try to accommodate about any time available.
d. Budget for 06-01 is due February 28th and will be pretty close to last year which was
$4965.
e. In 05-06 money budgeted.for floor covering in the kitchen and hall had to be used for the
new roof on the Command Trailer and adjustments had to be made to pay for the vests.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS
a. Renae indicated she could help in getting speakers. Perhaps for exercise and also for
some of our meetings.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:37 p.ni.
JoAnn Johnson, Secretary
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY,MARCH 7, 2006 AT 6 P.M.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
March 7,2006
The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met at the regular time at the Emergency
Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3. The meeting was called to order by
Chairperson,, Vic Pfennighausen at 6:02 p.m. Agendas were distributed.
MEMBERS PRESENT—JoAnn Johnson, Vic Pfennighausen, Debra Hurst, Susan Taylor, Glenn
.Nichols, Dottie Raborn and Lew Neeb.
MEMBERS ABSENT—Rich Haubert.
CITY STAFF—Assistant City Manager, Steve Berry
GUESTS PRESENT/INTRODUCTIONS—Grand Terrace Fire Station 23 Battalion Chief, Gary
Bush and Jim Vert. Introductions were made all around.
CORRESPONDANCE/COMMUNICATIONS —None..
APPROVAL OF AGENDA motion by Debra Hurst and second by Dottie Raborn.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 7. 2006 Motion by Debra Hurst and second.by
Glenn Nichols.
LIAISON REPORT by Steve Berry .
a. Steve will attend a three day training session in.March or April at Pacific Grove on
Hazardous situations.
b. Activation/exercise is set for April 26`h from 9 until noon..
c. Staff has been identified for these exercises although this list could also be changed.
d. The$11,000 that seemed to be for our EOC seems to have been meant for the Sheriff s
'Department.
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT by Vic Pfennighausen
a. Susan delivered the vests and they are quite satisfactory.. Color-coded by station.
b. Question of how to do.the lettering on the back. Steve mentioned that Ever Ready
Embroidery should be checked out. Also, silk screen will be investigated.'
c. Vic indicated that all equipment is working well.
d. He indicated that all colors had been corrected on all framed charts. j
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Vic indicated that the next CERT training will be in June at Rialto Fire
b. Gary Bush from Station 23 indicated that they were soliciting for more instructors for
CERT trainers.
c.. Discussion on Grand Terrace Days. At May meeting we can try to draw up a schedule
for coverage at the EOC trailer.
NEW BUSINESS
a. Vic outlined several jobs that need to be done in and for the EOC.
b. Debra will help out on Monday the 131h from 1 to 3 and Susan will help on Friday the
171h (from 1 to 3?)
c. The Office-in-a-Box boxes all need to be gone through and notebooks need updating.
d. Perhaps small bits at a time can be done and then updated on' a regular basis.
TRAINING/SPEAKERS
a. Gary Bush commented that our set up was functional and easy to identify areas.
b. The Fire Station is activated to Level l when any EOC in the area is activated.
c. In the event of an earthquake all vehicles are out of the station and onto the streets to
locate any problems.
d. He indicated that he was available to the EOC and to the city at any time.
e. He will follow up on the CERT training.
f. He indicated that there is a full Captain on a full 24 hours as well as a Battalion Chief
on 24 hours. Also, there are 15 members on call at all times.
g. Station 23 has one heavy rescue vehicle.
h. The Brush Truck is an all purpose rig, including medical aid, foam application and carries
500 gallons of water.
i. Station 23 is a priority move-up station, meaning it goes to Riverside and Colton when
needed.
j. The EOC committee was invited to hold a meeting at Station 23 or just to come and visit.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:54 p.m.
JoAnn Jol�on, Secretary
NEXT MEETING WILL BE TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2006 AT 6 P.M.
COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
w
COUNCIL MEETING-DATE APRIL 13, 2006 DATE APR 5, 2006
PROBLEM:
The Emergency Operations Committee has an application for Alternate membership from Randy
S. Halseth. Mr. Halseth is an excellent candidate and the Committee has the position available.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do nothing.
SOLUTION(S):
Accept the application of Randy S. Halseth as Alternate member Number 3.
PROPOSED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF:
Accept the application of Randy S. Halseth as Alternate member Number 3.
!I
� 1b
CITY
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
° APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE
GROND TERR C
Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department
Applying as a member of �"M e fit.G elvc/ o P& (10
Name
Address 2 a.7.9 a
Home Phon Business Phone L'f a LG 1Fe 9 7 31 S 7.0 7
Occupation / i2 e l� v�T� ,�� e.7'
Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) //?I d- A s'
Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? ( ) Yes (/S No If so, please list
Why are you interested in this appointment? W,'4 7p S'�2 D� �`a Sow� ��ci Tl.e-
What do you consider to be your major.qualifications? V,20 (/S d j 2a,y •Z� �'� �'�E
References
3.
Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City
Council.
COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL MEETING DATE APRIL 13 2006 DATE APR. 5 2006
PROBLEM:
The Emergency. Operations Committee has an application for Alternate membership from Jim
Vert. Jim Vert is an excellent candidate and the Committee has the position available.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do nothing.
SOLUTION(S):
.Accept the application of Jim Vert as Alternate member Number 2.
PROPOSED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF:
Accept the application of Jim Vert as Alternate member Number 2.
i
i
CITY
O CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
UKHMU ARK c APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN SERVICE
Complete and submit to the City Clerk's Department
Applying as a member of9 C
Name a.e 5 Veg-r
Address I �97 keLl SS -DRIVE
Home Phone 9t9' 293— 9337 ( i_ �-�5�5" Business Phone q09- fig!—I8fls-
Occupation /��2Ccrrn/ c�T
Education (List highest year completed and all degrees) l8
Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? (✓) Yes ( ) No If so, please list
Why are you interested in this appointment?
R- 9Z a-
What do you consider to be your major qualifications? uae�
References
1. Gs T'l u�,,,�c:si- P.0° 4), OV — 78�— 5596
2. (30qJ gas- .3707
i 1-1 ' CousT�rxrtu.:cv,
3. �i��T 2 7�iC.1/ r�bvc�s `U9- 0/07 /�-�s s Dr,v�
Please attach a written statement containing any additional information you feel would be useful to the City
Council.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED
CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE BAR ? 7 2006
.Regular Meeting
MINUTES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
February 13,2006
The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular meeting at the Senior Center.
Meeting was called to order at 6:05 p.m. by Chairperson, Philomene Spisak. .
MEMBERS PRESENT were Chairperson, Philomene Spisak, JoAnn Johnson, Dottie Raborn, Don
Bennett, Lew Neeb and Pat Smith.
MEMBERS ABSENT— Richard Rollins.
CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT.— Amber Emon, SSS
GUESTS PRESENT—Robert Stewart, Debra Hurst(who submitted an application for
membership) and Mayor, Maryetta Ferre'.
INTRODUCTIONS - Were made all around.
AGENDA was approved with motion by Lew Neeb and second by Dottie Rabom.
MINUTES for the meeting of January 9, 2006 were approved with motion by Pat Smith and second
by Dottie Rabom.
PUBLIC COMMENT—.None.
CORRESPONDENCE—None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Swindles (to be changed to Criminal Activities)
a. Social Security Numbers of retired military are on their ID cards. Ask to have it
removed.
b. May be a good idea to put in signature place on cards "Check for picture I.D.".
c. It was emphasized how difficult it is to have credit report cleared up once it has
been damaged.
d. Added caution about using ATM's and also mailing checks especially during tax
time. Go inside post office to deposit mail.
I
B. Action Item to go to Council j
a. Action Item to go to Council was read, recommending Debra-Hurst as Alternate
Member. .
C. Grand Terrace Days
a. The date is June 3, 2006 with Parade at 9:30 and Festival from 10 until 3.
b. Applications are out. All fees have been raised.
c. Next meeting will be March 1"at 2 pm.
D. Action Item: Jessica's Law Recommendation
a. There has been no feed back from the recommendation to Council to support
Jessica's Law.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Crime Prevention Planning'—Nothing new.
B. SSS Vacancy- Has been filled by Amber Emon.
REPORTS .
A. Summary of Law Enforcement Activity
a. Report on looking into putting in red light cameras. 1'
b. Justified by study done earlier. Possible locations' Barton Road and Mt. Vernon, .
Mt. Vernon and De Berry and Barton Road and Michigan.
c. Some of the gangs working in Grand Terrace have been identified.
d. Crest Apartments is having problem with kids after school. Some vandalism.
Request watching,.especially from 2:50 to 3 615 if possible.
e. Could also be some High School students causing some of the problems.
B. Citizen Patrol Report—Bob Stewart
a. Actual total number of hours by Citizen Patrol in 2005 was 2898.
b. Hours for January were 226.
c. Two people presently waiting for Academy. Others to be interviewed.
C. Other Community Programs
a. Philomene reported on the Fire Works Committee progress.
D. Member Reports
a. Lew reminded everyone that it is now illegal to dispose of batteries in the trash.
ADJOURNMENT-There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00
P.m,
stc—
f.'SecretaryA JoAnn Johnson
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
Minutes for March 6, 2006
The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were
Pauline, Colleen Edmundson, Masako Gifford, Gloria Ybarra, City Clerk Brenda.Mesa, Shelly
Rosenkild, and Ann Petta.
Secretary's Report: The Minutes for February 61h were read and approved on a motion by Colleen,
seconded by Ann. Motion carried.
Treasurer's Report: The budget shows a balance of$944.03. The Petty Cash balance is $246.76.
Shelly submitted a bill in the amount of$13.35 for decorations for the Anniversary Potluck Dinner
from Wal-Mart. Colleen reimbursed Shelly out of Petty Cash for this receipt.
Historical Report: No report
Old Business: Art Show- This year's Art Show will be held on Sunday,May 7`h from 1:00 to 4:00
P.M,
Colleen brought three needlepoint portraits made by Hannah for our committee to view. Our
committee decided that the portraits need cleaning. Shelly advised that she will check the internet
to see if there is a website that offers this type of cleaning. The portraits will then be exhibited at
the Art Show.
Ann reported that she has begun calling people for participation in the Art Show and that so far seven
people have agreed to participate."Ann noted that Vic Sumner,along with his wife Lynn,will again
display their Bon Sai trees.
Shelly turned in the cable ad for the Art Show to Brenda.
Colleen noted that she will tend to getting the posters out two weeks prior to the Art Show.
New Business: Workshop -The billboard workshop is scheduled for Monday,March 27`h at 12:30
p.m.
Ann suggested that Gloria purchase all-purpose note cards for special occasions. Colleen will then
reimburse Gloria for these cards.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. The next meeting will be April 3, 2006.
Resp jFtfully Submi ed,
Gloria Ybarra,
Secretary
C nu.
z?/
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
Minutes for February 6, 2006
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were
Pauline, Ann Petta,Colleen Edmundson, Frances Carter, Gloria Ybarra, City Clerk Brenda Mesa,
and Shelly Rosenkild.
Secretary's Report: The Minutes for January 9, 2006 were read and approved with corrections by
Frances, seconded by Colleen. The first correction pertains to the exclusion of the location of the
property owned by Clayton and Jewel Rogers. The property is located on the comer ofBarton Road
and Vivienda in Grand Terrace. The second correction is the date of the Art Show which_will be
held on Saturday, May 6th and on Sunday, May 7, 2006 and not just on May 7`.'as was previously
reported.
Treasurer's Report: The budget shows a balance of$1,036.57. Shelly submitted a bill for $26.26
for balloons and decorations for the potluck. A second bill was submitted for $65.00.for the Sun
Newspaper subscription.
Historical Report: Frances brought our committees attention to an article in"the `Blue Mountain
Outlook" news publication. concerning Elizabeth_ Cox. She.is the author, whose two books
"California Pioneers" and "Southern California Miscellany will be available for.purchase on
Sunday, March 19, 2006 from 2 p.m. -4 p.m. at the Grand Terrace Library. The.presentation and
book signing is sponsored by the Grand Terrace Friends of the Library. Ms. Cox also wrote for the
"Fedco Store Reporter." Ann submitted a bus schedule route for Grand Terrace dated 8/2/76 for our
historical collection..This bus schedule was in effect before Grand Terrace was incorporated.As was
discussed in our previous meetings,Frances passed out copies to each of our committee members
an article which appeared in the"Blue Mountain Outlook"concerning the anniversarypotluck. The
article details the history of the annual potluck as well as the history of the Grand Terrace Lion's
Club. The Lion's Club was selected as the focus of the birthday celebration for 2005. Frances
shared an article from the news publication the"Highgrove Happenings"with our committee. The
article, dated August 2004, is about Frances' husband, Kenny Carter, and his extensive model
railroad train collection. Mr. Carter, a former Railroad Engineer, specializes in pre-war trains.
Old Business:Art Show-Colleen advised our committee that she has needlepoint work by Hannah.
In honor of Hannah's memory, a suggestion of having a prize drawing of the needlepoint work at
the Art Show was considered. Colleen will bring the needlepoint work to our next meeting for our
committee to view.
Ann stated she will be calling people for participation in the Art Show. As it now stands, the
deadline for the applications for the Art Show is,April 15i
Our committee advised that fifty posters will be prepared for the Art Show.
Shelly will bring the poster, cable ad and application for the Art Show to our next meeting for our
committee's review. She noted that another billboard for the Art Show is needed. At our next
meeting, our committee will decide on the workshop date for the billboard.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. The next meeting will be March 6, 2006.
Respectfully Submitted,
Gloria Yb za
Secretary
j
t
I
STAFF REPORT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CRA ITEM() COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: April 13,2006
SUBJECT: Fireworks Ordinance FUNDING REQUIRED: YES Q NO(X) .
At the Council Meeting of February 23, 2006 Council voted to accept the following
recommendations made by the Fireworks Ad Hoc Committee with the understanding that these
would be incorporated into an Ordinance that would be approved by the Council.
Attached is the proposed ordinance which has incorporated the items as recommended by the
Fireworks Sub Committee to Council on February 23,2006 and those modifications are:
• The Committee recommended the City continue to allow the sale of safe and sane
fireworks.
• Modify the sale period to July 1st—4th, 9am—9pm (presently June 28, 12 noon—July 5,
11:59pm)and modify the discharge dates are July 1"—4th,_9am—1lpm. (presently June
28, 12 noon—July 5, 11:59pm).
• Increase fines for use of illegal fireworks has been increased to the maximum allowable to
either$1,000 or$2,000 depending on the City Attorney's interpretation of the maximum
allowable by law. -
• Enforcement as recommended by the Sheriffs Department and Fire Department: .
Sheriff's: during the sales period (currently 4 days) provide 1 Supervisor, 1 Detective,2
Deputies, and 1 Evidence Technician; Fire Department: up the staff to 2 engines (8
personnel)on the 3rd considering the day of the week the 4th falls on.
• Maintain the current ordinance that allows only youth sports'groups to participate in the
sale and continue to limit it to one location.
• Create a no discharge area in the Honey Hills and the bluff area north of Grand Terrace
Road between Mt.Vernon and Barton Rd.
• Open parks on the evening of the 4th of July if fireworks are banned in the above described
areas.
• Committee to meet after the 4th of July to evaluate statistics on number of calls for service
and make any new recommendations to Council if appropriate.
• Inform residents in all possible media outlets of the new rules and fines.
• Posters of current notices and fines located at the sales booth.
• Create an internal tip line for the 4th of July to direct law enforcement and fire to fireworks
related calls. j
• Surcharge of 3%on fireworks sales for partial reimbursement for extra law enforcement.
• Copies of the rules and fines to be handed out at the fireworks stand.
• Create and man a fireworks booth at GT Days to promote fireworks safety.
fIf
C'O
I
FMCN n r
The attached ordinance revision reflects the changes recommended by the Fireworks.
Committee. The Staff would like Council to focus on two areas of the proposed changes that
require some discussion. Staff recommends Council not authorize use of the parks for
fireworks discharge. Unsupervised .use of fireworks in the parks.would be dangerous and
subject the City to liability exposure if any injuries did occur. The other area of concern are the
no discharge zones. This will be the first year to actively target illegal fireworks. Our limited
fire and sheriff staff will have their hands full enforcing the prohibition of illegal fireworks and
will likely have very little time to enforce against legal fireworks in the non-discharge areas.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:.
STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL CONSIDER THE. REVISED FIREWORKS
ORDINANCE AND ADOPT OR AMEND AS NEEDED.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
8.112 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE AND
REGULATING THE SALE AND DISCHARGE OF FIREWORKS
_ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 8.112 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code is hereby amended.to read
as follows:
8.112.010 Dates and hours of sale and discharge. Safe and sane fireworks as defined by
Section 12529 of the Health and Safety Code of the state may be sold within the City during the
period of July ? - 4`h, 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. and the discharge dates are July 1" - 4`h,.9:00 a.m.
11:00 P.M. pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and not otherwise.
8.112.020 License Required. Except as provided in this chapter,it is unlawful for anyperson
to offer for sale or sell at retail any fireworks of any kind in the city without having first applied for
and received a license therefor. This chapter shall supercede Uniform Fire Code Section 78.102 as
to safe and sane fireworks.
8.112.030 License - Land use application -Public liability insurance. All applications for
a license to sell fireworks shall:
A. Be made in writing accompanied by a license fee of fifty dollars and a land use application
fee of thirty-three dollars submitted to the community and economic development
department. The fees are not for the purpose of revenue,but will be,used to defray the costs
of application.processing, inspection and supervision. A 3% surcharge will be paid to the
City as partial reimbursement for extra law enforcement.
B. Set forth the proposed location of the fireworks stand applied for. The stands must be on
private property located in the commercial and industrial or manufacturing zones and the
written permission of the owner of record or lessee must accompany the application-
according to Zoning Code Section 18.73.211, Temporary Uses Allowed.
C. Be accompanied by an assurance that if the license is issued to applicant, applicant shall, at
the time of receipt of the license, deliver to the City Clerk's office one hundred
thousand/three hundred thousand dollars public liability and fifty thousand dollars property
damage insurance policies with riders attached to the policies designating the City as an
additional insured under this chapter, and a copy of the requisite permit from the State Fire
Marshal.
D. Be routed to the Fire Chief;Building and safety Director, and the Sheriff's Department via
-1-
the Land Use Application. The community and Economic Development Department will
evaluate the location of the fireworks stand and related issues.
8.112.040 License-Prerequisites to Issuance. The following qualifications must be met by
each applicant for a license issued under this chapter:
A. No license shall be issued to any person, firm or corporation except nonprofit associations
or corporations organized primarily for youth sports.
B. Each such organization must have its principal and permanent meeting place in the corporate
limits of the city and must have been organized and established in the city's corporate limits
for a minimum of one year continuously preceding the filing of the application for the
license, and must have a bona fide membership of at least one hundred fifty members.
C. No organization may receive more than one license for fireworks sale. One license may be
issued to two or more qualifying applicants as a joint venture. The maximum number of
licenses which may be issued pursuant to this chapter shall be one.
8.112.050 Suspension of license-Appeal procedure.
A. The fire chief or his designee shall be authorized to suspend immediately and without notice
or formal hearing the license of any licensee which violates any rule,regulation or ordinance
while operating or preparing to operate a fireworks stand during or immediately preceding
any period of sale. If the fire chief or his designee establishes that a violation has occurred
too late to suspend the license during the period of sale,he shall have power to suspend the
licensee from future licenses, and to suspend the priority of the licensee for any such
violation found to have occurred during or immediately preceding or immediately following
the authorized period of sale.
B. The decision of the fire chief or his designee to suspend the license of any licensee shall be
subject to review by the city manager, forthwith. In view of the limited.sales period each
year, for suspensions affecting the sale period, such hearing shall be held at the earliest
possible time that the licensee,city manager or his designee,and the representative of the fire
chief can schedule a meeting for such review.
8.112.060 Operation of stand.
A. It is.unlawful for the licensee organization to permit any person other.than the licensee
organization to operate the stand for which the license is issued or to otherwise participate
in the profits of the operation of such stand.
B. It is unlawful for the licensee organization to permit any person other than the individuals
who are members of the licensee organization, or the spouses or adult children,of such
members,to sell or otherwise participate in the sale of fireworks at such stand.
C. It is unlawful for the licensee organization to pay any consideration to any person for selling
or otherwise participating in the sale of fireworks at such stand.
-2-
t _
8.112.070 Temporary fireworks stands. All retail sales of safe and sane fireworks.shall be
permitted only from within a temporary fireworks stand, and sales from any other building or
structure is hereby prohibited. Temporary stands shall be subject to the following provisions:
A. No fireworks stand shall be located within twenty-five feet of any other building nor within
one hundred feet of any gasoline pump.
B. Fireworks stands need not comply with the provisions of the building code of the city;
provided,however,that all stands shall be erected under the supervision of the building and
safety director,who shall require that stands be constructed in a manner that will reasonably
insure the safety of attendants and patrons.
C. No stand shall have a floor area in excess of three hundred square feet.
D. Each stand in excess of twenty-four feet in length must have at least two exits. Each stand
in excess of forty feet in length must have at least three exits spaced approximately
equidistance apart;provided,however,that in no case shall the distance between.exits exceed
twenty-four feet.
E. Each stand shall be provided with two two-and-one-half gallon soda-and-acid or water
pressure type fire extinguishers, underwriter approved, in good working order and easily
accessible for use in case of fire.
F. Posters of current notices and fines need to be posted and copies of the rules and fines
handed out.
8.112.080 General requirements for licensees.
A. All weeds and combustible material shall be cleared from the location of the stand.including
a distance of at least twenty feet surrounding the stand.
B. "No smoking" signs shall be prominently displayed on the fireworks stand.
C. Each stand must have an adult in attendance and in charge thereof while fireworks are stored
therein. Sleeping or remaining in the stand after close of business each day is forbidden.
D. , The sale of fireworks shall not begin before 9:00 a.m. on the 1 st day of July and shall not
continue after 9:00 p.m. on the 4'day of July.
E. All unsold stock and accompanying litter shall be removed from the location by five p.m.on
the 6`'day of July.
F. The fireworks stand shall be removed from the temporary location by twelve noon on the.8'
day of July, and all accompanying litter shall be cleared from the location by said time and
date.
8.112.090 License fee and land use application fee. The license fee for the selling of
fireworks within the city shall be eighty-three dollars(fifty dollars plus thirty-three dollars)per year
per stand,which fee must be paid at the time application for a stand is filed with the community and
economic development department.
8.112.100 Temporary sales tax permit required. Organizations licensed for the selling of
fireworks are required to obtain a temporary sales tax permit from the San Bernardino office of the
-3-
State Board of Equalization.
8.112.110 Display of license and sales tax permit. The license to sell fireworks and
temporary sales tax permit shall be displayed in a prominent place in the fireworks stand.
8.112.120 Permissible locations for discharge. The use of fireworks in the city shall.be
limited to private property. No fireworks shall be discharged on public,semipublic or private open
areas such as parking lots, vacant properties, in a public street right-of-way or public parks. A no-
discharge area will consist of Honey Hills and the Bluff area north of Grand Terrace Road between
Mt. Vernon and Barton Road. ! ?
8.112.130 Prohibition on discharge. It is unlawful for any person to ignite,explode,project,
or otherwise fire or use,any fireworks,or permit the ignition, explosion or projection thereof,upon
or over or onto the property of another without his consent, or to ignite, explode, project, or
otherwise fire or make use of, any fireworks within ten feet of any resident dwelling or other
structure used as a place of habitation by human beings. Fireworks shall not be discharged within
two hundred feet of any dry grass or brush-covered land.
8.112.140 Fireworks defined. Fireworks shall be defined as set forth in Section 9.108 of the
Uniform Fire Code.
Section 2. Effective Date-This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on
the 31S`day of its adoption.
Section 3. Posting-The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three(3)public
places within fifteen(15)days of its adoption, as designated for such purposes by the City Council.
Section 4. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 13'day
of April and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 27"'
day of April, 2006.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the.City Council thereof.
Attest:
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
-4-
r
i
I
MND TERN C
Community Services Department
Staff Report
MEETING DATE:. April 13,2006
SUBJECT: Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee Calculation &'Nexus
Report, Circulation Fees Calculation
FUNDING AUTHORIZATION NOT REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
Developer Impact Fee and Nexus Study
In 1989, California passed legislation commonly referred to as AB1600(Government Code Section
66.000, the Mitigation Fee Act) for the purpose of regulating the formulation of development impact fees.
Basically, the law requires that the fees not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of the public facility
improvements necessitated by the new development. A reasonable relationship or nexus must exist
between the need for the public facility improvements, the type of development, and the fees imposed.
In order to establish a nexus between anticipated development, planned improvements, and fees, an
extensive analysis was conducted. The City contracted Revenue&Cost Specialists to prepare the Master
Facilities Plan and the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report. Over the last eight .
months RCS and staff have identified the City's capital projects.and capital acquisitions (presented in the
MFP)that would be necessary in order to maintain the current Level of Service provided to the
community with consideration for the projected level of development. The capital costs were then used to
calculate the development impact fees proposed in the DIF report. The combination of both reports is the
documentation supporting the proposed changes to the current development impact fees, and addition of
Public Use Facilities and Parkland and Open Space Acquisition fees.
The City sent letters to all active developers within the city and the BIA(Building Industry Association)
inviting them to a meeting at City Hall on March 13; 2006 to discuss the proposed fee changes..Present at
the meeting was:
• Scott Thorpe of RCS
• Craig Neusteadter of TEP
• Steve Berry, Assistant City Manager
• Richard Shields, Building and Safety
• Mike Foley, Foley Development
In the 2005 City-wide Prioritization Study, the council ranked Developer and User Fee Review number
12 out of 35 priorities.
Circulation Improvement Fees
The City of Grand Terrace approved a circulation improvement fee program(Chapter 4.104 of the
GTMC) that included fees for new traffic signals and arterial street improvements. The arterial
component adopted in 1999 covers full completion of the city's General Plan circulation element.
The city contracted with Craig Neustaedter of Transportation Engineering and Planning(TEP)on the
initial circulation improvement fee program in 1999 and on the proposed 2006 fee update.
A provision of the measure I extension that was approved by San Bernardino County voters in 2004
requires each local jurisdiction in the urbanized areas of.the county to adopt a development mitigation
program.that addresses regional transportation needs. For the city of Grand Terrace, this program
essentially consists of the arterial improvement program adopted in 1999. The city is under a deadline of
November 2006 to revise its fees to be eligible to receive future subventions from the extension of
Measure I. SANBAG has reviewed the proposed fee schedule and attached tables (1-4) and has
Confirmed the proposed fee update is'consistent with the SANBAG nexus study requirements.
ANALYSIS
Developer Impact Fee.and Nexus Study
Staff and RCS had identified over$9.2 million in capital projects and capital acquisitions necessary to
preserve the existing Level of Service currently provided to the community.. About 3.5% of the identified
development-generated capital projects can be funded by an existing balance in the,various existing
development impact fee funds. The detail of the capital projects and capital acquisitions is presented in
the Master Facilities Plan document. The Master Facilities Plan incorporates the General Plan, other
official documents and recommendations by RCS into one document which identifies future infrastructure
needs through projected General Plan build-out.
The Development Impact Fees.Calculation and Nexus Report present two possible schedules for adoption:
Table 2-5 page 23, Maximum Development Impact Fee(Fair Share) and Table 2-6 page 24, Minimum
Development Impact Fee(Marginal Needs).
The Maximum DIF is calculated with consideration for equity or excess capacity built into the current
infrastructure systems, allowing for the recoupment of prior excess investment in the system. The
adoption of the recommended maximum impact fees supported by the calculations in the Report(Schedule
2.1)would finance all of the development-generated capital facilities by raising upwards of$10.2 million
towards the$9.2 million in capital need through the General plan build-out.
The Minimum DIF only considers covering the current cost of the new capital acquisition with no
consideration for existing equity in the system. If this group of impact fees were adopted and imposed,
(based upon the lesser of either the Marginal costs or Existing Equity-based fees (per Schedule 2.2), less
than full project funding (86.5%) could be expected with a net unfunded portion increasing to about
13.5% or about$1:3 million of the$9.2 million project total.
The recommendation is for adoption of the Maximum Development Impact Fee, which requires future
residents and businesses to contribute an equivalent amount or fair share toward the completion of the
infrastructure systems necessary.
Under the recommended Maximum DIF(fair share) approximately$10.2 million could potentially be
raised to finance all of the development-generated capital facilities needed through the General plan build-
out.
An overall Development and Circulation Fee Comparison of 13 Inland Empire cities for Single Family .
Home fees is attached as Exhibit "A"..
A detailed explanation of the calculation requirements, assumptions and findings is presented in the
Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report provided for your review.
.FINANCIAL IMPACT
Developer Impact Fee and Nexus Study
Adoption of the Maximum DIF could potentially provide up to$10.2 million to fmanceddentified
development-generated infrastructure through General Plan build-out, minimizing the impact on general
government resources.
Circulation Improvement Fees
Adoption of the revised circulation improvement fees are estimated to generate$11.1 million for arterial
improvements and$2.5 million for signal improvements. In addition, by adopting the revised arterial
circulation fees, the city will become eligible for up to$26.8 million of local Measure I subventions to
supplement funding for construction of the city's arterial improvement program. These funds would be
allocated to the city over a period of years after 2010 when the Measure I extension begins. SANBAG
has not yet determined how these funds will be allocated locally, so it is not possible at this time to
determine how much money the city would receive on an annual basis.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council:
• Approve the Master Facilities Plan and adopt an Ordinance pertaining to the Development
Impact Fees based on the Master Facilities Plan(MFP), and the Development Impact Fee.(DIF)
Calculation and Nexus Report prepared by Revenue&Cost Specialists(RCS).
• Approve the fee increases for the Developer Impact Fees in Chapter 4.80 and the new Table
«A„
I
• Approve the new Arterial Improvement Fees in Chapter 4.104.060 and the new Table "B"
Table 1
Grand Terrace Circulation Improvement Cost Estimates
Street: From: To: Estimated Cost 2006 escalated Local growth Cost
cost(2.5 %) component chargeable
Barton Rd. _ 1-215 over crossing $4,000,000 $4,100,000 0.40 $1,640,000
Barton Rd. _ SP.R.R. 1-215 Over crossing $1,252,800 $1,284,120 0.40 $513,648
Barton Rd. (e.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E.City Limits $706,875 $724,547 0.40 $289,819
Barton Rd. (w.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E. City Limits $1,060,313 $1,086,820 0.40 $434,728
Michigan St. _Barton Rd. Commerce Way _ $322,770 $330,839 0.40 __$132,336
Michigan St. _ _ Commerce Way DeBerry St. $517,650 $530,591 0.40 $212,237
Main St. _ S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. $157,760 $161,704 0.40 $64,682
Main St. _-- Grade Separation $18,100,000 $18,552,500 $3,337,400
Mt.Vernon Ave. _ Barton Rd. 700 ft north of Minona $429,780 $440,525 0.40 $176,210
Mt.Vernon Ave. Canal St. N. City Limit _ $403,100 $413,178 0.40 $165,271
Commerce Way _ 900 ft. North of De Berry Pico _- $7,545,568 $7,734,207 0.40 $3,093,683
Commerce Way _ Pico Main St. $2,488,432 $2,550,643 0.40 $1,020,257
$36,985,048 $37,909,674 $11,080,269
*See SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study Table 6(9/28/05, page 20).
COST TO CONSTRUCT ARTERIAL SIGNALS
City Responsibility: Cost chargeable:
1) Barton @ Grand Terrace 1.00 $250,000
2) Barton @ Palm 1.00 $250,000
3) Barton @ Honey Hill 1.00_ _ $250,000 _
4)Michigan r@ Commerce Way _ 1.00 _ __ $250,000
5) Mt.Vernon @ Canal 1.00 $250,000 _
6) Mt.Vernon @ Van Buren _ 1.00 _ _ $250,000
7) Mt.Vernon @ Pico _ 1.00 _ _$25_0,000
8) Main @ Mt Vernon 0.50 _ _ $125,000
9)_Main @ Michigan _ _ 0.50 __ $125,000
Sub-total _ $2,000,000
"25% Design&contingencies $500,000
----------------
Grand total $2,500,000
Table 2
Future Development Trip Generation Analysis
Land Use Representative Daily
Category Quantity Parameter Source Use Trips
SFDU 667 Unit SANBAG Single family detached housing 6383
MFDU 937 Unit ISANBAG Residential Condorrownhouse 5491
Retail 800415 sq. feet City Shopping Center 34370
Industrial/warehouse 823937 sq. feet City General Light Industrial 5743
Office 100000 sq.feet City General Office Building 1101
Total 53088
v Total (Assume 50% retail pass-by reduction) 35903
Arterial Program
Cost per trip without retail pass-by reduction: $208.72
Cost per trip with retail pass-by reduction: $308.62
Traffic signals
Cost per trip without retail pass-by reduction: $47
Cost per trip with retailpass-by reduction: $70
Table 3 _
Grand Terrace Proposed Circulation Fees
Arterial Improvements
Max fee
Land Use _ �I w retail pass-by
ra
Category Quantity Pameter Trips/unit ,: reduction
SFDU 667 Unit 9.571 $2,953.37
MFDU 937 Unit _ 5.86 $1,808.55
Retail 8004.15 sq. feet 0.04 $6.63
Industrial/warehouse 823937 sq.feet 0.01 $2.15
Office 100000 sq.feet 0.01 $3.40
Traffic Signals j
_ Max fee
Land Use w retail pass-by
Category Quantity Parameter Trips/unit ,i reduction
SFDU 667 Unit 9.57 $666.36
MFDU 937 Unit 5.86 $408.06
Retail I 800415 sq.feet . 0.04 $1.50
Industrial/warehouse 823937 sq.feet 0.01 $0.49
Office 100000 sq. feet 0.01 $0.77
Total Proposed Circulation Improvement Fee
Max fee
Land Use i w retail pass-by
Category Parameter _ reduction
SFDU Unit - -I_ 1�— $3,619.73
MFDU j _ Unit j j $2,216.61
Retail sq.feet _ j $8.12
Industrial/warehouse i sq.feet $2.64
Office sq. feet $4.16
i
Table 4 '
Grand Terrace Circulation Fee Comparison
Arterial Improvements
Proposed Adopted Fee(June 2000)
Land Use 2006 District A. District B.
Category Fee
SFDU (unit) $2,953.37 $1,250.00 $650.00
MFDU (unit) $1,808.55 $1,250.00 $650.00
Retail (TSF-GLA) $6,630.00 $2,560.00 $890.00
Industrial/warehouse
TSF-GFA $2,150.00 n.a. n.a.
Acre* $23,413.50 $8,230.00 $4,230.00
Office $3,400.00 $2,220.00 $990.00.
Traffic Signals
Proposed Adopted Fee(June 2000)
Land Use 2006 District A and B
Category Fee
SFDU (unit) $666.36 .$80.00
MFDU (unit) $408.06 $80.00
Retail (TSF-GLA) $1,500.00 $150.00
Industrial/warehouse
TSF-GFAj $490.00 : n.a.
Acre*. $5,336.10 $550.00
f, Office(TSF-GLA) $770.06 $120.00
Total Proposed Circulation Improvement Fee
Proposed
Land Use 2006 Adopted Fee(June 2000)
Category Fee District A. District B.
SFDU (unit) $3,619.73 $1,330.00 $730.00
MFDU (unit) $2,216.611 $1,330.00 $730.00
Retail (TSF-GLA) $8,130.00 $2,710.00 $1,040.00
Industrial/warehouse
TSF-GFA $2,640.00 n.a. n.a.
Acre* $28,749.60 $8,780.00 $4,780.00
Office(TSF-GLA) $4,170.00 $2,340.001 $.1,110.00
*Proposed industrial/warehouse acreage fee shown for comparison purpose only.
C
EXHIBIT A
Development and Circulation Fee Comparisions
Single Family Homes (SFH)
CitV Developer Fees Develo er Fees Circulation Fees Total
Current Proposed Current Proposed Current Proposed
Grand Terrace $ 1,594.00 $11,251 $ 1,250.00 $2,679.00 $ 2,844.00 $13,930
Loma Linda $17,130.00 $ 2,800.00 $19,930.00
City of San Bernardino $21.,000.00 $0 $21,000
Ontario $33,739.00 new Colon $0 $33,739.00
$23,684.00 old Colon ) $23,684.00
Chino $22,105.00 $0 $22,105.00
Fontana $15,109.00 $ 1,617.00 $16,726.00
Rancho Cucamonga $17,754.00 $ 1,710.00 $ 19,464.00
Redlands $18,121.00 $ 343.00 $18,464.00
Rialto $25,778.00 $ 473.00 $26,251.00
Yucaipa $13,771.00 $ 7,330.00 $21,101.00
Riverside County TUMF $ 9,319.00
(effective 7/06)
Perris $10,664.00 $ 9,319.00 $ 19,983.00
Corona $17,651.00 $ 10,498.00 $28,149.00
Moreno Valle $13,121.00 $11,015.00 $24,136.00
Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA RECINDING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT FEE
SCHEDULE AND CIRCULATION FEE SCHEDULE(4.104) AND REPLACING IT
WITH ANEW FEE STRUCTURE AND RECINDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE FEE SCHEDULE(4.80)AND REPLACING
IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is continuing to experience new development of its vacant
parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of existing
buildings; and
WHEREAS, the rate of construction and growth continues to drive the demand for
municipal services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's public
facilities in order to provide those services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in order to in
accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including general government
facilities,parklands and open space,public meeting facilities,storm drainage facilities,
street and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 Of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed to
accommodate future growth, estimated the costs of these improvements, and identified.
the potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is required to update its Circulation Fees by
November 2006 to be eligible for supplemental funding that will become available under
San Bernardino County's.Measure I Program starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code Section
6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the required pubic hearing
held; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to California Government code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained schedule of fees and charges has been published
as required; and
i
WHEREAS, all requirement of California Government Code Section 6600 et seq.,are
hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the heading and fees in Chapter 4.80 and replace with the
following:
Developer Impact Fees
A. Storm Drainage Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $2,234 ;---
2. Attached Dwelling Units $429 --
3. Mobile Home Units $679
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.353
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.337
B. General Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $1,102 -
2. Attached Dwelling Units $1,102
3. Mobile Home Units $1,102
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.208
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.208
C. Public Use Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $674
2. Attached Dwelling Units $422
3. Mobile Home Units $515
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) NO FEE
5. . Industrial Uses (Units = SF) NO FEE
D. Parkland and Open Space Acquisition Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $7,241
2. Attached Dwelling Units $4,534
3. Mobile Home Units $5,540
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.051
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.046
Circulation Impact Fees
Rescinding the fees and Table "A" in Chapter 4.104.050 and replace with
the following:
Traffic Signal Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $666.36
2. Attached Dwelling Units $408.06
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $1,500
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse(TSF-GFA) $490
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $770
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
See attached new Table"A"
Delete 4.104.040 "B"
Two circulation improvement fee districts are established. District A shall
encompass the portion of the city bounded by I-215 on the west,Barton Road on the
north,Michigan on the east and Main Street on the south. District B shall
encompass all other areas of the city.
Delete 4.104.090 "Fee adjustments"
From time to time the city shall review the fee schedule and make
adjustments, as appropriate, in consideration of changes in construction and right-
of-way costs.
Replace 4.104.090 with "Fee adjustments"
On an annual basis, the city will review the Circulation and Traffic Signal
component of the fee schedule and make adjustments to it pursuant to the
construction cost index provided by SANBAG.
Rescinding the heading and fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4.104.060 and
replace with the following:
Arterial Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $2953.37
2. Attached Dwelling Units $1808.55
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $6630.00
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse(TSF-GFA) $2,150.00
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $3,400.00
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
See attached new Table"B"
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof
City Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California; do
hereby certify that the foregoing.Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the
2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
Brenda Mesa
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
John Harper
TABLE A
COST TO CONSTRUCT TRAFFIC SIGNALS
City Responsibility- Dollar*:
1 Barton @ Grand Terrace 1.00 $250,000
2 Barton @ Palm 1.00 $250,000
3 Barton Honey Hill 1.00 $250,000
4 Michigan @ Commerce Way 1.00 $250,000
5 Mt. Vernon @ Canal 1.00 -$250,000
6 Mt.Vernon @ Van Buren 1.00 $250,000
7 Mt.Vernon @ Pico 1.00 $250,000
8 Main @ Mt. Vernon 0.50 $125,000
9 Main @ Michigan 0.50 $125,000
Subtotal $2,000,000
"25% Design &contingencies $500,000
Grand Total $2,500,000
TABLE B
ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATES
Street: . From: To: Estimated Cost Local growth Fee
com"onent Char eable
Barton Rd. 1-215 overcrossin $4,000,000.00 0.40 $1,600,000.00
Barton Rd. S.P.R.R. 1-215 Overcrossin $1,252,800.00 0.40 $501,120.00
Barton Rd. (e.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E. City Limits $706,875.00 0.40 $282,750.00
Barton Rd. (w.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E. City Limits $1,060,312.50 0.40 $424,125.00
Michigan St. Barton Rd. Commerce Way $322,770.00 0.40 $129,108.00
Michigan St. Commercy Way De Berry St. $517,650.00 0.40 $207,060.00
Main St. S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. $157,760.00 0.40 $63,104.00
Mt. Vernon Ave. Barton Rd. 700 ft. north of Minona $429,780.00 0.40 $171,912.00
Mt.Vernon Ave. Canal St. N. City Limit $403,100.00 0.40 $161,240.00
Commerce Way 900 ft. North of De Berry Pico $7,545,568.00 1.00 $7,545,568.00
Commerce Way Pico Main St. $2,488,432.00 1.00 $2,488,432.00
$18,885,047.501 1 $131574,419.00
Community and Economic Development Department
CALIFORNIA
STAFF REPORT - Y
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: April 13, 2006
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Specific Plan No.05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766) and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21) to
construct a 35 single family condominium development
(Continued from the meetings of January 26, 2006 and
March 9. 2006)
APPLICANT: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre
parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue
about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon
Avenue and Brentwood Street.)
RECOMMENDATION: Open the Continued Public Hearing on the proposed
Specific Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map; Receive
any testimony; Close the Hearing and Approve the
Ordinance for Specific Plan No. 05-02 for First Reading
and Approve the Resolution for Approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03
Background:
The second public hearing for this project was held on March 9, 2006 and was continued
to the Council meeting of April 13th in order to allow the applicant to respond to remaining
issues raised by members of the Council. These remaining issues consisted of the
following items:
1. Fencing, especially along the southerly boundary of the site and along
Mt. Vernon.
2. Lighting plan concerns.
3. Better visualization of the project and adjacent
C i L A^
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • 909/ 824-6621
The applicant has prepared exhibits to address the concerns raised by.members of
the Council. at the second hearing on March 9th. The applicant and their
representatives will present to explain these new exhibits and materials at the
continued public hearing on April 13th. These exhibits include a new drawing on the
detention basin, drain details,. spec.'s and photos of inlet drains in the area (Exhibit 8);
several photographs of street scenes of adjacent properties (Exhibit 9); a revised 11"x 17"
Lighting Plan (Exhibit .10); and a 11 x 17" street scene/perspective from Mt. Vernon
(Exhibit 11).
The Planning Commission's and staffs recommendation remains the same as forthe priori
meetings that this development be approved.
For reference and continuity, Staff has also provided a copy of the Staff reports from the
meetings of January 26th and March 9th along with the Exhibits for those prior reports. The
proposed Ordinance for the Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the proposed Resolution of
Approval for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 are also attached here as,Exhibits
6 and.7 respectively,
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the
Ordinance for the Adoption of Specific Plan No. 05-02,(Exhibit 6) and the Resolution of
Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766) (Exhibit 7).
Respectfully submitted, Approved by:
r � 2
JhJn Lampe Gary L. oontz
ociate Planner Community Development Director
GLK:JL:jl
Exhibits: Exhibit A " Specific Plan No. 05-02 (Document)
Exhibit B - Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study,E-05-21
Exhibit 1 -Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No..17766)
Exhibit 2 - Planning.Commission Staff Report for'12/15/05
Exhibit 3 - Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of 12/15/05
Exhibit 4 - Staff report to the City Council dated January 26, 2006
Exhibit 5 - Staff report to the City Council dated March 9, 2006 with
attachments
Exhibit 6 - Ordinance Approving and Adopting SP-5-02
Exhibit 7 - Resolution of Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 05-03
Exhibit 8 - Detention basin exhibit, drain details, spec. sheet and photos of
inlet drains in the area
Exhibit 9 Street scenes of adjacent properties
Exhibit 10 - 11" x 17" revised lighting plan
Exhibit 11 - 11" x 17" street scene/perspective of site from Mt. Vernon.
c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\SP-05-02councilrpt.conbnued.2
PROPOSED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Document Type: Negative Declaration (Mitigated)
Date: November 22,2005
Project Title: SP-05-02,VTTM-05-03, SA-05-19, SA--05-24 and E-05-21
Project Location: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the
westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750 feet southerly of the
intersection of Mt.Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street.)
■ Description of Project: The proposed project will be made up of 35 condominium units to be sold
to individual home buyers. The project will consist of two-story single-family residential units with
three and four bedrooms. It will be developed as a condominium type of subdivision. A vesting
tentative tract(VTTM-05-03, County No. 17766) has been filed for this development as it is a
condominium project. Sp-05-02 has been filed as a Specific Plan for this project detailing the
architectural style, parking, setbacks, access, landscaping,walls and fencing details/standards for
the development. There will be two models, a Plan 1 of about 1,658 sq. ft. and a Plan 2 of about
1,771 sq.ft. SA-0519 and SA-05-24 have bee filed for each model.
Project Proponent: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities
Lead Agency: Community Development Department, City of Grand Terrace
Contact Person: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director
(909)430-2247
Public Review Period: Began:Tuesday, November 22, 2005 Ended: , 288
Public Hearings/Meetings: Planning Commission-Thursday, December 12005 and City Council
on Thursday, January 26, 2006 and Thursday, March 9, 2006
Environmental Finding:
Based on an Initial Study, attached hereto, prepared to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of approving SP-05-02,VTTM-05-03, SA-05-19, SA-05-24 and
E-05-21, the said project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration on the grounds
that it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment with the
recommended mitigation conditions.
Signature:
Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director
EXHIBIT B
c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\negativedclaratonSP-05-02
City of Grand Terrace
Community Development Department
Environmental Checklist Form
I. Project Title: Specific Plan No. 05-02, Site and Architectural Review Case
No.'s 05-19 and 05-24, Tentative Tract No. 05-03 and
Environmental Review Case No.05-21
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace
r
Community Development Department
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace,CA 92313
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director or John
Lampe,Associate Planner (909)430-2247
4. Project Location: 11830 Mt.Vernon Avenue An approximately
located on the westerly side of MtVernonAvenue bout 750
feet southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and
Brentwood Street.)
5. Project Sponsor's Name The Greystone Group,Inc.and Sequoia Equities
6. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential
7. Zoning: 'R3"(Medium Density Residential)
8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved,including but not limited to later phases of the
project,and any secondary,support,or off-site features necessary for its implemntation. Attach additional
sheets if necessary.)
The project will be'made up of 35 condominium units to be sold to individual home buyers. It will consist of
two-story single-family residential units with three and four bedrooms. The project will be developed as a
condominium typ ofsubdivision. A tentative tract(TTM-05-03,County No.17766)has been filed as a Specific
Plan for this project detailing the architectural style,parking,setbacks,access,landscaping,walls and fencing.
details/standards for the development. There will be two models,a Plan 1 of about 1,658 sq.ft.and a Plan 2
of about 1,771 sq.ft. SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 have been filed for each model.
9• Surrounding Land Uses and Settings:(Briefly describe the project's surroundings.)
North: The Highlands Apartment Complex, Zoned R3
East: Single family homes, Zoned R1-7.2
South: The Highland Apartment Complex,private school,and convalescent home,Zoned R3 and AP
West: ;The Highland Apartment Complex,Zoned R3
10. Other agencies whose approval is- required (e.g., permits, financing approval, o
agreement) r participation
.City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety—building and grading permits;County of San
Bernardino Fire Department.—plan check requirements;Riverside Highland Water Company for water
connection and service; and City of Grand Terrace Public Works for sewer connection.
Community Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that
is a"Potentially Significant Impact'as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services
❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Services Systems
❑Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics
❑Water ❑Hazards ❑Cultural Resources
❑'�Quality El Noise ❑Recreation
J ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance
-Determination:
On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency):
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment;there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project._ A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect
- 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a .
"potentially significant impact, or `Potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL
]MPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.,
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT
be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately
in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
i
Si ture Date
Gary L.Koontz Community Development Director
Printed Name Title
Community Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead,agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one
involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.
the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-
site,cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well
as operational impacts.
3) "Potential Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or.more."Potential Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, and EIR is required.
4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potential Significant Impacf'to a "Less
than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures
from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier Analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EM,or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an.earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the
checklist.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a
previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to
the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached,and
other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
Community Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general elan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑
(Source: General Plan Categories Map; and Zoning
District Map—This will mitigated by the filing of a
Specific Plan which will act as the Zoning for this site.)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project?(There are no known agencies where the
proposed project would cause a conflict.)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(Zoning District Map,Zoning Regulations, City Zoning ❑ ❑ ❑
Code)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g.,
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from ❑ ❑ ❑
incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant
agricultural resources in Grand Terrace)
J Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community(including a low-income or ❑ . ❑ ❑
minority community)? (The site is relatively small and
is vacant. It will not divide any portion of the
community.)
A brief explanation to answer I:
The proposed is inconsistent with some development standards of the existing R3 zoning of the site;therefore,a Specific Plan
has been filed which will act as the new zoning for the site with new development standards. The Specific Plan will have to be
written to conform to the requirements of State Law. The project with its modified development standards could be
incompatible with nearby single family development but the potential impact will be less than significant because of the
proposed landscaping and architectural design. In addition,there are no agricultural resources in Grand Terrace and no part of
the community will be disrupted by this project.
Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure. If approved,
the Specific Plan will eliminate the conflicts with the existing R3 Zoning of the site.
i
Community Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): PotentiallyPotentially Less than
y No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
II. Population and Housing. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (This project is consistent ❑ ❑
with the City's General Plan and the number of units
proposed is about 80%of the maximum density
allowed in the existing R3 Zone.)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑
indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)?(This project is
an"infill"type project; the number of unit proposed
will not necessitate any expansion of services.)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑.
housing? (The property is presently occupied by an old
single family residence which is substandard and need
of renovation.)
A brief explanation to answer II:
The proposed project is relatively small in size. The zoning of this site has been R3 for a number of years. The proposed
project is only about 80%of the maximum allowed by the existing R3 zoning. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and will not exceed population projections for the City. It will also not induce growth because of its relative small size.
In addition,the property is occupied by a substandard residence which will be replaced by the new development.
III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? (General Plan MEA/EIR-ES-4) ❑ ❑ ❑ -
b) Seismic ground shaking?(GP MEA/EIR-II-1) ❑
c) Seismic ground failure,including liquefaction? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑
MEVEIR-II-1)
d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP MEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑
-
e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEVEIR II-1) ❑ ❑ ❑
fl Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑
MEVEIR II-20)
g) Subsidence of the land? (GP MEVEIR IN,Append ❑ ❑ ❑
B)
h) Expansive soil? (GP MEVEIR II-1,Append B-4) ❑ ❑ ❑
n Unique geologic or physical features? (GP MEVEIR ❑ ❑ ❑
Community Development Department 5 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact _ Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
A.brief explanation to answer III:
No active or potentially active fault traces cross the site. The only known potential geologic hazard to the site is from seismic
ground shaking which is not unusual for any site in Southern California. This and any other geologic hazard will be mitigated
by the requirements that all residential structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the
Uniform Building Code. Also,a ort will be required before the issuance of a grading permit or building permits for
this project for the construction f re dences.
Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure:This project must meet the
requirements that all residential structures be designed and constructed to meet the seismic standards of the Uniform
Building Code.
IV. Water. .Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEVEIR II-1 ❑ ❑ ❑
Append B)
b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑
such as flooding? (GP 1VIEA/EIR II-1)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ -
surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR II-1)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ -
body? (GP MEABIR II-1) -
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑
movements? ()
fl Changes in the quality of ground waters, either through ❑ ❑ ❑ -
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through
substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability?
(GP MEA/EIR II-1)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑
MEA/EIR II-1)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR II-1, ❑ ❑ ❑
and 97 Regional WCA Report)
I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ -
otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP
M EVE1R II-1)
Community Development Department. 6 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
A brief explanation to answer IV:.
The proposed project is to construct 35 single family residential units. There will be some increase in impermeable surface
area;however,the existing storm drain system in the area will be handle the additional runoff. The submitted hydrology has
indicated the amount of run-off from this project. In addition,before grading permits are issued for this project all NPDES
requirements will have to be met which should ensure that many of the impact to water resources will be eliminated. These,
requirements have been set out in the required"Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan." Also,all water for the use of this
project will be provide by the local water provider,the Riverside Highland Water Company.
V. Air Quality. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
existing or projected air quality violation? (GP
MEA/EIR II-14, and AQMP)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
contains an implementing action to reduce such
exposure)
c) Alter air movement,moisture, or temperature, or cause . ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
.any change in climate? (Any such implementing
actions are designed to have a positive effect on the
region's air quality)
d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
proposals are included in the Element)
A brief explanation to answer V:
The proposed project is relatively small size. With only 35 units it does not have the capacity to significantly impact the air
quality of the region. There will be a very small increase in air pollution primarily from the vehicles of the new residents;
however,this will not be significant.
Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measure. For the grading of the site where
dust will be generated,appropriate dust control measures will be integrated into grading plans and activities as required
by the City as part of the conditions of the grading permit.
Community Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially . Potentially , Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
VI. Transportation/Circulation.Would the proposal result :
a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑
(Trans.Engineering and Planning Consultant)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑
sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or
incompatible uses? ( )
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ❑ ❑ ❑ .
nearby uses? ( )
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ❑ ❑ ❑
bicyclists? (TCM Ordinance 147)
fl Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑
alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (TCM Ordinance.147)
g) Rail,.waterborne or air traffic impacts? () ❑ ❑ ' ❑
Brief explanation to answer VI:
The proposed project is to has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. He concluded that because of its
relatively small size that a traffic*study would not be required even though there will be some slight increase n traffiC
which will not be significant. In addition,he stated:"The project will have no significant traffic impacts on the
adjacent streets and•intersections." The export of 25,000 cubic yards of earth will be mitigated by requiring that the
proposed haul route be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director to minimize the potential
effects on the neighborhood.
i
i
Community Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis.
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No .
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
VII. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or
their habitats (including but not limited to ❑ ❑ ❑
plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP
MEVEIR II-20,Append C)
b) Locally designated species (e.g.,heritage
trees)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20) ❑ ❑ ❑ —
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑
MEVE1R II-20)
d) Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian, and
vernal pool)? O ❑ ❑ ❑
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
(GP MEVEIR II 20). ❑ ❑ L]
Brief explanation to answer VII:No rare or endangered species are known to live in the urban areas of Grand Terrace. In addition,there are no desirable
large trees on the site or wetland habitats. No adverse impacts to biological resources are expected from of this projectthe development
VM. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy ❑ ❑ ❑
conservation plans? (GP MEVEIR
II-19, and Append D)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a ❑ ❑ ❑
wasteful and inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑
known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (GP
MEA/EIR II-19, and Append B)
Community Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
i
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Brief explanation to answer VIII:
No mineral resources have been identified in the City. Therefore the development of the proposed 35 residential units will
not adversely impact any mineral resources. In addition,the project will have to be constructed in compliance with the
energy standards of the building code.
IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑
release of hazardous substance
(including,but not limited to: oil,
pesticides,chemicals, or radiation)?
(GP MEA/EIR II-7)
b) Possible interference with ❑ ❑
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan? (GT
Emergency Plan, and GP MEA/EIR
1I-13)
C) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ ❑ ❑
_ potential health hazard? (GP
t MEA/EIR II-1)
d) Exposure of people to existing ❑ ❑ ❑
sources of potential health hazards?
(GP N EVE1R II-1)
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ ❑
flammable brush,grass, or trees?
(GP MEVEIR II-6)
i
Brief explanation to answer DC:
There are no known hazards on the site or the immediate surrounding area including areas of flammable brush. In
addition,this is a residential project with no storage of hazardous materials other than what would normally be found in a
residential setting;however,such storage will not be significant.
Community Development Department 10 Initial Study and'Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
X. Noise. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increase in existing noise levels?
(City Noise Element) ❑ ❑ ■
b) Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? (City Noise Element) ❑ ❑ ❑ ,
Brief explanation to answer X.
There will be some increase in ambient noise level simply from having 35 new homes on the site
which is presently vacant except for one older residence;however, this increase will not be
significant. In addition,the site is located just west of Mt. Vernon Avenue which has been identified
in the City's Noise Element as an existing and future noise generator. However,this will be mitigate
by the conditioning that this project conform to the requirement of.the Building Code for interior
noise insulation for any structures impacted by noise from Mt. Vernon.
Finding:Potential impact reduced to a level of insignificance with mitigation measures. This development will be
conditioned to comply with all requirements of the Building Code for interior noise insulation if required. The noise
associated with the export of 25,000 cubic yards of earth will be minimized by the City's Noise Ordinance which restri(
such activities between 7:00 a.m.and 10:00 pan. _
M. Public Services. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( )
b) Police protection? O ❑ ❑ ■
c) Schools? ( ) ❑ ❑
d) Maintenance.of public facilities, ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
including roads? O ❑ ❑ . ■ ❑
e) Other governmental services? ( )
Brief explanation of answer XI.
This proposed project for 35 single family residential units is relatively small in size. As for any residential project there
will be some effect on public services but because of the relatively small size of the project all of these effects will be less
than significant. In addition,there will be an increase in the City's property tax base because of the development of
existing vacant land and the developer will also have to pay the school impact fee for this project before building permits
are issued.
Community Development Department, 11 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alternations to the following
utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (GP
MEA/EIR II-32, II-33). ❑ ❑ ❑
b) Communications systems? (GP
MEA/EIR II-33) ❑
c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ■ ❑
distribution facilities?(GP ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
MEA/EIR II-30)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP
MEA/EIR II-30) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
e) Storm water drainage? (GP
MEA/EIR II-33) ■ ❑
fl Solid waste disposal? (GP
MEA/EIR II-32) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
g) Local or regional water supplies?
(GP MEA/EIR R-30) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Brief explanation of answer XII.
This proposed project for 35 single family homes is relatively small in size. As for any residential project there will be
some effect on utility services but because of the size of the project all of these effects will be less than significant.In
addition,no individual utility has identified any problems in being unable to service this project.
XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
highway? (GP MEA/EIR II-22)
b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ ■
aesthetic effect? (Proposed site plan
and project elevations )
c) Create light or glare? ❑ ❑
Brief explanation to answer XIII.
The proposed project does not lie near scenic highway or will block scenic vistas. In addition,any potential aesthetic
impacts will be mitigated by the conditions of the project such as the regulation of the architectural design and the
requirement for a landscaping plan.
Community Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis .
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
XIV. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
(GP MEA/EIR II-20) ❑ ❑ ❑
■
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
(GP MEA/EIR H-20) ❑ ❑ ❑
c) Affect historical resources? (GP
MEA/EIR II-22) ❑ ❑ ❑
d) Have the potential to cause a
Physical change which would affect ❑ ❑ ❑
unique ethnic cultural values? (GP
AMA/EIR H 22)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact ❑ ❑ ❑
area? ( )
Brief explanation to answer XIV.
No known palentological,archaelogical or historical resources exist on the site. No cultural values or sacred uses will 1--
impacted by this project.
XV. Recreation. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for
neighborhood or regional parks or ❑ ❑ ❑
Other recreational facilities? (GP
MEA/EIR II-21)
b) Affect existing recreational
opportunities? (GP MEABIR II-21) ❑ ❑
Brief explanation to answer XV.
As the project is residential,there will be some increase in the demand for and affect on recreational resources;however,
as only 35 units are involved such effects will be less than significant. In addition,there will on-site recreational facilities
which will mitigate the demand for public recreation facilities.
Community Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant. impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
XVI. Mandatory findings of significance.
a) Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the ❑ ❑. ❑
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish ormildlife
population to drop below self-
sustaining levels,threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community,reduce the number or
restrict the range of rare or
endangered plant or animal,
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term,to the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
disadvantage of long-term,
- environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited,but ❑ ❑ ❑
cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects,the effects of
other current projects, and the
effects of other probable future
projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial ❑ ❑ ❑
adverse effect on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Community Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Issues(and Support Information Sources):
Potentially Potentially Less than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Brief explanation to answers XVI.
No Impact.The proposed project is relatively small with only 35 units. Any effects on the environment resulting from this
project will either be less than significant or will be fully mitigated by the regulations of the submitted Specific Plan or the
required permits such as the building and grading permits.
XVII. Earlier Analysis.
Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier
15063 c 3 EIR, or negative declaration. Section
( )( )(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where th
review. ey are available for
■ Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and
EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available at
the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department.
b) Impacts`adequately addressed. Identify,which effects from the above checklist wE
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards,and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation
measured based on the earlier analysis.
■ Not Applicable
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are"Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated,"describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined
from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the
project.
■ Not Applicable
JL jl
Grand Terrace Community Development Dept
Authority:Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087.
References:Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),210801,21090.3,21082.1,21083,21083.3,21093,21094,21151;Sunstrom v.
County of Mendocino,202 Cal.App.3d 296(1988);Leonoff v.Monterey Board of supervisors,22 Cal.App.3d 1337(1990)
c:1MyFilesUOBN\KargerlKarger2-5-051E-04-01
Community Development Department 15
Initial Study and Environmental
Analysis
Ttle Btu Wmqlail Cit.,
Community and Economic Development Department
CALIFORNIA
I
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: Thursday,December 15,2005
SUBJECT: SP-05-02, SA-05-19, SA-05-24, Vesting Map TTM-05-03,
(County No. 17766) and E-05-21 to construct a 35 unit single
family condominium project on 3.7 acres
APPLICANT: The Greystone Group,Inc. and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt.Vernon Avenue(An approximately 3.7 acre parcel
located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750 feet
southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood
Street.)
RECON131ENDATION: Open the public hearing,receive the staff report and testimony,
close the hearing and approve the Resolution calling for the
approval of SA-05-19, SA-05-25 and E-04-21 and recommend to
the City Council the approval of the Resolution calling for the
approval of Vesting Map TTM-05-03 and the adoption of the
Ordinance for SP-05-02
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval to construct 35 single family residential units with attached
garage parking for residents and open parking for guests. "Lot"sizes will range from 2,676 square
feet to 4,341 square feet. The average"lot"size is 2,941 square feet. The site will be accessed by
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 923- EXHIBIT 2
-
a single,non-gated vehicular access to Mt.Vernon at its southeast corner. The internal street system
will be provided by a 26 foot wide loop private street. There will also be a 26 foot wide Emergency ("
Vehicle Access to provide secondary access to the interior of the site.
The site will also include passive landscape statement adjacent to the main entry as well as an active
open space in the center of the development. With a proposed density of 9.5 units per acre, the
applicant believes this proposed new residential development will act as a"transitional element"
between existing single-family community on the east side of Mt.Vernon Avenue and the Highland
Apartments on the west side of Mt.Vernon. The applicant further points out that this proposal will
replace an aging and poorly maintained residence in the neighborhood with"an attractive,vibrant
neighborhood that will complement the otherwise positive fabric of the community..."(The proposed
request and applicants quotes were taken from page II-1 of SP-05-02,Exhibit A.)
SITE AND SURROUND AREA:
The subject site is an approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the west side of Mt.Vernon Avenue
about 750 southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Brentwood Street. The site is
presently occupied by single family residence, a swimming pool and at least four wood and/or
corrugated metal accessory structures. All of these buildings are located on the northerly side of the
site. The existing structures and other facilities on the site will be demolished and the site will be
cleared for the proposed project.
The site still contains numerous mature trees as part of the existing residential development. The
topography of the site slopes from east to west. The existing site slopes about 4.5%in a westerly
direction with Mt.Vernon Avenue as the high point of the subject site. The site falls nearly 25 feet
from east to west and steps down creating three more or less level pad areas at its westerly end.
There are substantial slopes throughout the perimeter of the property with the steepest being along
the southerly edge. It should be pointed out that the Highlands Apartments to the north, west and
south of the site mainly lie at a lower elevation than the subject site.
As noted above, the surrounding area is developed with the Highlands Apartment complex to the .
north,west and south. The area to the east on the easterly side of Mt.Vernon Avenue is developed
with single family residential uses. The Highlands Apartment complex consists of two-story
structures while most of the homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon are one-story in height. The
average density of the Highlands is about 17 dwelling units per acre based on past calculations by
Staff.
Mt. Vernon Avenue is a 88 foot-wide Secondary Highway as shown on the City's Circulation
Element. It is developed with curbs,gutters and meandering sidewalks on its westerly side at this
location. No request have been made by the City's Public Works department for right-of-way or
street improvements.
The City's Master Plan of Storm Drains shows no storm drains along this section of Mt. Vernon
excepting for a short 24" segment bringing water across Mt. Vernon from the east side to the west
side located at the south end of the site.
For an aerial view of the site and surrounding area,please see Attachment 1.
C GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING:
The site is located in the R3(Medium Density Residential)Zone. This site has been zoned for multi-
family use for at least 20 years. The site is also located in the"MDR"(Medium Density Residential).
Category of the City's General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan
and falls within the density limitations of the R3 Zone.
The maximum density allowed in the R3 Zone is 12 units per acre. At 35 units,the overall density
of this project is approximately 9.5 units/acre which is consistent with the R3 Zone.
The properties to the north,west and south of the subject site are located also in the R3 (Medium
DensityResidential)Zone.Properties to the east are located in the RI-7.2(Single Family Residential
- Minimum required area 7,200 sq. ft.) Zone. Both of these zones are consistent with the City's
General Plan land use categories.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Specific Plan Document•
A Specific Plan document was submitted for this project and has been labeled Exhibit A. Since the
R3 (Medium Density Residential)would not accommodate this proposed project,it was necessary
to file a Specific Plan. In addition,the City's General Plan contains a policy that requires a Specific
Plan for those project exceeding 20 or more.units.
A Specific Plan under Sections 65450 and 65457 of the Government Code must contain a text and
a diagram or diagrams that specify all of the following in detail:
• Distribution,location,and extent ofthe uses of land,including open space,within the
area covered by the plan.
• Proposed distribution, location,extent and intensity of major components of public
and private transportation,sewage,water,drainage,solid waste disposal,energy,and
other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan
and needed to support the land uses described in the plan.
• Standards and criteria by which development will proceed and, where applicable,
standards for conversation, development, and utilization of natural resources.
• A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public
works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out the matters listed
above.
Exhibit A contains a description of the project setting,subject site characteristics,surrounding uses
and a statement as to the project's relationship to the City's General Plan. It also includes a detailed
discussion of the proposed project including types of uses, architectural styles, development
standards to be employed, grading/drainage discussion and proposed phasing. The Specific Plan
concludes with a discussion on the infrastructure which will service the new development including
utilities, sewer service and traffic control. It should be pointed out that the Specific Plan document
includes reduced copies of all of the plans and exhibits for this project.
As such,the submitted Specific Plan No. 05-02 does meet these requirements of the Government
Code. As such,the Specific Plan will serve as the"zoning"for this project. An Ordinance to adopt
the Specific Plan has been prepared for the Commission's consideration for a recommendation to
the City Council. The Ordinance is included at the end of this Staff Report as Attachment 25.
Site Plan:
The site plan,marked Exhibit 1, shows the proposed development consisting of 35 single family
detached units distributed throughout the development. All of the units will be two stories in height.
Interior access will be provided by a 26 foot wide interior drive with a"loop"configuration and with
the main entrance and exit to Mt. Vernon located in the southeast corner of the site. A second
"emergency only"entrance from Mt.Vernon to the site will be provided in the northeast comer to
satisfy the Fire Department.
The two-story single family residential units will be setback 19 feet from the Mt. Vernon right-of-
way and approximately 6 to 12 feet from the interior southerly,westerly and northerly property lines.
The typical rear setback for the homes along the northerly property line will be 9 feet;for the homes
on the southerly property line the rear setback will be typically 10.6 feet. The homes in the interior
will have larger rear setbacks of up to 14.8 feet. In addition,the single family residential units will
be set back 10 to 13 feet from the interior drive loop system for most of the units. The distance
between residential buildings will be 8 feet.
It.should be pointed out that with some of the units setting 10 feet back of the interior drive, the
individual driveways to these units will only measure 15 feet or so in length. A full sized car parked
in one of these driveways could block the sidewalk along the interior drive. A 5-foot wide sidewalk
is proposed around the outside edge of the interior drive loop. Staff is suggesting that if this project
is approved,it be conditioned that no individual driveway be less than 18 feet in length as measured
between the garage door and the outer edge of the sidewalk.
The proposed parking includes two spaces in each garage for a total of 70 covered spaces. Also,
there are 18 open spaces for guest or visitor parking.This open guest parking is located in two areas;
one near the open space area in the center of the development and the other near the southeast main
entrance. In addition, potential parking on the individual driveways to each unit could provide
another 70 off-street spaces. All of this parking is located in the interior of the development and will
not be readily visible from Mt. Vernon.
Two common open space areas are shown on the site plan, Exhibit 1. The larger of the two is
located in the center of the development,towards its westerly side. This open space will be 5,268
square feet in size. No development features are shown for this open space area excepting for a what
appears to be walkway crossing through the middle of the open area. Also, one of the open guest
parking areas lies adjacent to this open space area; and an underground detention is shown at this
location. The other open space area measures some 1,892 square feet in size and lies just south and'
C next to the southeast main entrance. No improvements,are shown for this latter open space area..
Additional outside recreational amenities will be provided in the form an exterior patio area for each
residential unit. This patio area typically measures about 12'x 15'..
A five to six foot block wall presently is constructed along the northerly, westerly and southerly
boundaries of the subject site. This development proposes to replace this fencing with a retaining
wall the proposed height shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan,Exhibit 13. On top of this
wall f t high screening wall is proposed along these same property boundaries. Along the Mt.
VemonTmntage the fencing will include"enhanced pilasters." The location of this fencing has not
been indicated on the site plan or the conceptual grading plan. Interior residential fencing between
units will be 5 ft. - 10 in. and will be painted wood with gates. For a detailed discussion of the
fencing for this development,please see page II-5 of the Specific Plan.
A 8 %s"x 11"reduction of the site plan has been included in this staff report as Attachment 2.
Floor Plans:
The project consists of two floor plans with three different,alternate elevations for each of these two
floor plans. Both floor plans will have a two-car garage and both will be two stories in height.
According to the Specific Plan the design and layout of these units will utilize a concept called the
"pocket lot." The floor plans will focus on private outdoor space. This space is created by creating
a notch in the rear of the floor plan to be occupied by the private patio pointed out above. In
addition,the Specific Plan points out that"living and eating spaces orient towards this`pocket'and
create a`living arrangement that enhances the connection between indoor ace and private outdoor
space
space."
The two proposed floor plans have been labeled"Plan 1"(Exhibit 2)and"Plan 2"(Exhibit 6). Plan
1 includes a kitchen, living, dining room, %z bath and garage on the first floor, and the master
bedroom,two bathrooms and two additional bedroom on the second floor. .The total living area.of
Plan 1 is 1,801 square feet. Plan 2 has generally the same layout as Plan 1 but is slightly bigger with
1,828 square feet. In addition, there is an option for a fourth bedroom with a total size of the unit
at 1,963 square feet.
A 8 %z" x I V reduction of the floor plan of"Plan 1" has been attached to the.staff report as
Attachment 3; and, of"Plan 2" as Attachment 4.
Elevations:
The architectural style of this project incorporates, according to the Specific.Plan, elements from
early 20' Century California Spanish bungalows. Low pitched roofs and barrel shaped roof file
accent the Spanish character of the architecture. Stucco walls provide a modem interpretation of the
use of plaster walls typical of the.early Spanish bungalow style. Further, the window shapes and
sizes provide a "street friendly presence to the home." The use of decorative wrought iron and
shutters will accent the home and complement the Spanish style. The proposed colors will be
subdued while highlighting the California Spanish bungalow style.
The proposed alternate elevations for Plan 1 and Plan 2 are shown on Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 for Plan
1 and Exhibits 7, 8,and 9 for Plan 2. 8 Y?x 11 reductions of Plan 1 alternates are included here as
Attachments 5, 6, and 7 and Plan 2 alternates as Attachments 8, 9, and 10.
Preliminary Landscayina:
The preliminary landscaping plan is shown on Exhibit 10. The preliminary landscape plan shows
a generalized plant pallette including trees,shrubs,vines and groundcovers and generalized location
of various plantings. A more detailed discussion of the proposed"plant palette"is given on page
11-4 of the Specific Plan. In addition, the "Plant Legend" on Exhibit 10 shows that all of the
proposed trees will be 24" and 36"box in size.
As shown on the preliminary landscaping plan, the applicant will include in the landscaping the
adj acent parkways along Mt.Vernon. The Municipal Code requires the planting of street trees every
40 feet along both the street frontage,if necessary as there are already street trees along this section
of Mt.Vernon. The applicant will be required to plant and maintain the adjacent parkway.
A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan will be required to be submitted and to be approved prior
to the issuance of building permits. In addition,all of the landscaping will have to be installed prior
to the final occupancy of the.development.
A 8 %s"x 11"reduction of the preliminary landscaping plan is shown as Attachment 11.
Tentative Tract Mao:
This is a proposed condominium development; therefore,the necessity for the tentative map. The
tentative map is shown on Exhibit 11. The County number issued by the County Recorder's Office
is"Tract No. 17766." As a condominium project,only one lot is shown. Individual buyers will be
purchasing"air rights"to their individual unit and not an individual lot. The conditions of approval
include the requirement that there be a homeowners' association which will have the responsibility
of managing and maintaining this development. The"lot lines" shown on the site plan are"akin"
to the"lot lines"in a mobilehome development and will not be recorded"lot lines"for subdivision
purposes.
The proposed tentative map shows such details as existing development on the site,existing utilities,
adjacent streets,existing easements,the location of existing and proposed storm drains,the proposed
BUT storm filter and the proposed 8" sewer line. Also, the street sections for Mt. Vernon and the
private interior loop drive are also shown on the tentative tract map. The"vesting"portion means
that the rules and regulations of the City at the time the filing of the map is deemed"complete"will
apply,by law, to this subdivision proposal.. Lastly, this tentative map was reviewed by the City
Engineer and found to be acceptable.
A 8 %z" x 11"reduction of the tentative map is attached hereto as Attachment 12.
Conceptual Grading:
The conceptual grading plan is shown on Exhibit 12. The site will be
proposed graded to dram from
east to west at an average grade of 5.0%. East to west fall will be approximately 20 feet with the
easterly edge of the site having a high point of 1,087.50 feet and the lowest pad on the west end of
the site being 1,065.40 feet.Retaining walls will be used on nearly all of the south,west and northern
boundaries of the site. No retaining walls will needed along.the Mt. Vernon frontage. The'
maximum retaining wall height will be 10.5 feet along the southeasterly side of the project. Most
of the retaining wall heights,however,will range from 3 feet to 6.5 feet. The grading of the site will
generate approximately 25,000 cubic yards of export. To mitigate the export operation, Staff.
suggests that conditions be imposed to limit the hours of grading of the site and that the proposed
haul route for the exporting trucks be approved by the Community Development Director prior to
the issuance of any grading permits.
Storm water will be collected via an underground storm drain system and outlet through the retaining
wall near the southwest comer of the site. This storm drain system will also accept off-site water
currently being accepted onto the subject property from Mt.Vernon Avenue. The storm water will
exit the site via an outlet through the retaining wall onto the neighboring apartment site to the west.
The site will also generate an additional flow due to the addition of non-pervious materials. This
additional flow will be detained on site in an underground detention system underneath the open
space,pocket park is the center of the development.
The proposed structural BMP to treat the site water will be a storm filter or equivalent that will be
employed to comply with the City's Storm water Ordinance as part of the NPDES requirements.
This BUT will be designed to treat the"first flush"in a storm event as well as nuisance water from
irrigation.
A 8 %z" x I" reduction of the preliminary grading plan is shown on Attachment 13 in the staff
report.
Phasing:
This project is proposed to be "phased"consisting of three phases. A detailed discussion of the
proposed phasing is given on page 11-5 of the Specific Plan. A condition requiring the submittal of
a phasing plan/schedule to be approved by the City has been included in the Resolution of Approval,
Attachment 23 for the Site and Architectural Review applications.
Color and Material Board:
A"Color-and Materials"board for this project will be made available at the public hearing for the
Planning Commission's information and review. The board contains the color scheme that will be
used throughout the project along with of the stucco and roof tile. The applicant has described these
colors as"subdued"but highlighting the architectural style of the residential units.
REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS:
The following comments were made by various local agencies in reviewing this project.
The Department of Environmental Health:
Please refer to the comment made by the Department of Environmental Health in its notation dated
October 3, 2005 (Attachment 14).
Colton Joint Unified School District:
Please refer to the comments made by the Colton Joint Unified School District in its letter dated
October 3, 2005. (Attachment 15)
The Cb Engineer:
Please see the revised memorandum to Staff from the City Engineer on this project dated December
8,2005.
(Please see Attachment.16).
City Traffic Engineer:
Please refer to the comments made by the city traffic Engineer in his memoranda to Staff dated
October 9, 2005 and December 2,2005.(Attachment 17 and Attachment 18)
Building and Safety:
Pleaser refer to the comments made by the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in.his
memorandum of October 10,2005 (Attachment 19).
County of San Bernardino Fire Department. Community Safety Division:
Please refer to the comments made by the County Fire Department in its letter dated November 1,
2005 (Attachment 20).
Riverside Highland water Comyanv:
Please refer to the letter to staff from the Riverside Highland Water Company dated November 3,
2005. (Attachment 21).
Sequoia Equities:
Please see the letter from the adjacent property owner,Sequoia Equities,allowing for connection of
sewer and storm water drainage systems to cross the adjacent property to the west in order to service
the subject site. The letter is dated November 14, 2005 (Attachment 22)
t
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE:
The project proponent will be required to pay traffic signal improve ment
and circulation,
improvement fees as set forth by Ordinance No. 190. Said fees for medium density development are
$80/unit for the signal improvement fee and$650/unit(District B)for the circulation improvement
fee. These fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This project to construct 35 single family detached condominium units in the has qualified for
Mitigated Negative Declaration under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
in that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the Negative
Declaration and the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist with the mandatory finding of no impact
for this project are attached hereto as Exhibit B.
FINDINGS:
Section 18.63.060 of the Zoning Code requires that specific findings be made by the Planning
Commission in approving a site and architectural review application. These findings have been
incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (Attachment 23) for the requested two Site and
Architectural Review applications.
In addition, the City's Subdivision Ordinance requires that specific findings be made prior to the
approval of the tentative map. These findings are:
C
a) The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its . design and
improvements is consistent with the General Plan; and
b) The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development;and
c) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantiallyor avoidable injure fish orwildlife
or their habitat; and
d) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems; and
e) The proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and
improvements conform to the regulations of the City's Development Code and the
regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.
Specific findings based on these requirements have been incorporated into the Resolution of
Approval (Attachment 24) for the tentative map which will be heard and acted on by the.City
Council.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Upon the approval g
val b the Planning Commission, the proposed project will be subject to the
recommended conditions as included in the Resolution of Approval(Attachment 23)for the two site
and architectural review applications. Upon approval by the City Council,the proposed tentative
map for the condominiums will be subj ect to the recommended conditions included in the Resolution
of Approval(Attachment 24)for the tentative map. The Site and Architectural Review requests will
not be effective unless and until the proposed tentative map is approved by the City and Council and
is recorded.
ANALYSIS:
This site has been zoned for R3 uses for at least 20 years. The proposed project is consistent with
both the City's General Plan'and the Zoning Code. The project will be nicely designed in the
"California Spanish bungalow"style to fit in with the surrounding residential neighborhood which
includes the Highlands Apartments. The development will provide a transition use between the
apartment development west of Mt.Vernon and the single family residential use on the east side.
Finally,the applicant is proposing a condominium development with individual home ownership
which should alleviate some of the past objections from the community about rental development
in the City.
This is a well thought out and well designed project which will be an asset to the City. It will
develop a vacant site which in currently development with an aging residential structure and (,-
accessory structures.
RECONIIVII;NDATION:
The staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed 35 single family
development under SA-05-19, SA-05-24 and E-05-21 as called for by the attached Resolution of
Approval (Attachment 23) subject to the approval of the tentative map, TTM-05-03 by the City
Council;and that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council its approval of TTM-05-
03 as called for by the attached Resolution of Approval (Attachment 24) for the condominium
tentative map and that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of the
Specific Plan No.05-02 and the Adoption of the Ordinance for Specific Plan No.05-02.(Attachment
25)
Respectfully submitted,
ji
hn Lampe.Ass#iate-PMMer Gary L. oontz,CAmunity Development Director
GLK:JL jl
i
EXHIBIT A Specific Plan No. 05-02 document
EXHIBIT B Mitigated Negative Declaration with Initial Study
EXHIBIT 1 Site Plan of project
EX H BIT 2 Plan 1 - floor plan
C E)UMIT 3 Plan 1 - alternative#1 elevation
EXHIBIT 4 Plan 1 -alternative#2 elevation
EXHIBIT 5 Plan 1 -alternative#3 elevation
EXHIBIT 6 Plan 2-floor plan
EXHIBIT 7 Plan 2-alternative#1 elevation
F HHBIT 8 Plan 2-alternative#2 elevation
EXHIBIT 9 Plan 2-alternative#3 elevation
- . E3=IT 10 Preliminary Landscaping Plan
EX HO BIT 11 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03
EMMIT 12 Preliminary Grading Plan
ATTACHMENT 1 Aerial photograph of site and surrounding area
ATTACHMENT 2 8 %2"x I I"reduction of site plan
ATTACHMENT 3 8 W x I I"reduction of Plan 1 floor plan
ATTACHMENT 4 . 8 %2"x I I"reduction of Plan 2 floor plan
ATTACHMENT 5 8 %2"x I I" alternative#1 for Plan 1
ATTACHMENT 6 8 %z"x 11" alternative#2 for Plan 1
ATTACHMENT 7 8 %2"x I I" alternative#3 for Plan 1
ATTACHMENT 8 8 %2"x I I" alternative#1 for Plan 2
ATTACHMENT 9 8 %2"x I I"alternative#2 for Plan 2
ATTACHMENT 10 8 Y2"x I I" alternative#3 for Plan 2
ATTACHMENT 11 8 %2"x I I"preliminary landscaping plan
ATTACHMENT 12 8,Y2"x 11"vesting
TTM-05-03
ATTACHMENT 13 8 %2"x 11".preliminary grading plan
ATTACHMENT 14 Comments from the Department of Environmental Health dated 10/03/05
ATTACHMENT 15 Letter from the Colton Unified School District dated 10/03/05
ATTACFIlVIENT 16 Memorandum from the City Engineer dated 10/05/05
ATTACBN ENT 17 Memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer dated 10/09/05
ATTACHMENT 18 Memorandum from the City Traffic Engineer dated 12/02/05
ATTACHMENT 19 Memorandum from the Director of Building and Safety dated 10/10/05
ATTACHMENT 20 Letter from the County of San Bernardino Fire Department dated 10/10/05
ATTACHMENT 21 Letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company dated 11/03/05
ATTACHMENT 22 Letter from Sequoia Equities dated 11/14/05
ATTACHMENT 23 Resolution.of Approval for SA-05-19 and SA-05-24
-
i
c:UNyFi lesVOHN\Gcrald\SA-"-l Ocommreport
'r.*" V— "alr il-law
"wf WL X a-W
ri)
in
0-21.
�s
*t7
All
X
'A.
44
I
r :
r �
- rr
;
J` :;-:� � r• r i I -- ,•' !r �I _ � �i.•' �'!irc�.wir+i..� If
1
r.
-�- , ---T--- ,i}P."r.: �i"T_.,"'r�l°�r` +.�.Y ¢s ds.-nl � t'a rJ'�%�f .'�.• .-1. 'i'w
1 L__________- .. ..'fie/'. .f t _�. _ .. - __.. _'.i .�_ 7•",". 1 1 ') n.,�,r,.. ("' �.lf i.
r
�} E�crurure. ZONING INEpp11�T1p� 1 ,
9 rl IX•e SIR C - •1•s ni.°+:n'r•.'.:w en`vr�'�' .-w-.°i so v+e>r.e w+�r.r+or ��Ke• �� ,r :
arrc.
umm
S .�nri ww.�..yro o.r.n■o,. w asu unl .nn,wm•r
C�bFS lnpcm MM l9 as
_ �)
' 10IY�>in 7,IMs 'u��01�°'w .. ______ r.wn tin rww.r wt:•wwwu ar•
. r.wn`wra.�.m.rm w, 1 raw.,nu w.u:
. w.Y1aNLJ1u.+ra mr r,n - '.maw •fmn'�wo"n LL -
�M.
nunrl•w N1
Owi rru:iltmais Ur u tic tr nr.r ra,mu rt 3;:. rrr r..r.
T hl! orrr� .r��• a�a•n.a.•.a.o mr r..wr mr
RgVST
uoV K Conceptual Site Plan �1 PUSCOE urn
t✓aywrc qw�l I r��.w..(,u.,..,
r V4r - - - i -
OP.wp I I IJYMDI I'
WrW
Mi
w• 1
I r�rma
--- WAS
iL I 1 ro.40a
N+trf # I
n;mom I
I I I I
I
_ hL Y7
H I
I I
Plan 1
1, 801 SF
y
w
o ,
M
Ni
_ °' �jreen6riar s
City of G wA Tusw,Gli[o,.ia
Y r
It
I I aaaaY s I 1 i I I
K MWAM
I I
__ oaas�o
•l.Yl
�aaoafr
aANA=
Bps.mf
aA�.T
I I � ' ��w.•s
I I I uo
i or r.a&s 8a s --
. Y a. OR Yrw
M.
I OPTIONAL BEDRM 4
aaM• mmm s
of 11
Plan 2
y 1, 828 s . f.
l+J 1,963 s.f. x/ Opt. Bedrm. 4
y
. . Y
't muur I
Up of a-od TWeem, Cvl[o-1.
■
r
rr
c
T
a -
o _
n
rtrt rr'♦rr.,
RRAIR
pokawr
---- --
LEwr
RB31rr ra..w.1....e
.. Caeoawte"ISO weal
Plan 1
. �. wyw.a wrLaf calla
Y• mat Raga
"A" Elevations
MULL-
.� G. ware cr,rt,
w. .wa rarwi
J. MUIILUL I.r L'uauy Llyyi
w. YaaaraIl.a i 71.Uyl l�•'�In
L. YruoraL.lrr"I.0 w� u u
r. .LL&C Y—L
u � y
Grccn6riar
w,tio qp w
City or GLaae 7artaee.Calitarel. wnlwlM �r�
t
L
r 1 •
{
a
>I
Y r'
- 1'I"11'1'r'I'I I• -" J-F 1
1•r`� r 1'1 I'1'1'1 1 I'1
y
Lul I
- - -----
Ljwr
Plan
C• .4....Y.tt.. T..1.
y NDN ''"'"Elevations
DD ■. era .1.l
Y. kuw C....1
Yw.
L. Ywot.alw 1:.41
■• .tt.e YYt
. 1 Y
�TH
IK c�
(jrccn6n'ar
CLty.t Gtbd T.---. C.1LL.t.1. M
era- w
--- ---- mi
c
REAR FRONT
It
H
LEFT RICRI• Mtt..IdR IMwd
R. Cow t.fl TII.RMt
Plan 1 .. fltw�
f. Rio T."ft.,T.11.
n. ttwn r..rt.
R.t tt
C Elevations R. •� a.r. 6-4 11 11 M.et.r.
t:. t/o04 tttlta.
y R. rrr r^rttt•1
1. fll wren /►��+Trl.t
.I. Ow�nt.Ilw Ctewtot .lgllt
R, tl.emr.11w.TI!t tYtl�•r1•
.. 1.. elw:Ontlw OWa out: .•r•
` M. Atti.riM
V 0 t .
WH 1 tr. 1..0.
LeL.XW
Grccn6riar
— My of Ctwd Tort—,C&Uforo.L& '_ret�IM•� �M
i
A
1t8AR ,
Tr
y rr
y
LIN" - --- _ ----------
Plan 2 •, C.Y..L..-,1,.�.�
.. aw"
' C. YaY.w Y.wl f.li.
Elevations
f. YI.W►.LNM1/
.. wilt YuLL.
a. r.r C.I~
4rY.1
i. YLww../f
G.YJ.r T•u
J. Ilt.nr.11q CwuY I.ry41
�• rr.ul.li r. - p.11uuW�•
L. Irc.l.lir. O.11ouY.c.
r. sear v.a
0 1 Y1 Y
Mm
--- -------- - -- �jrcen6nar
Clty Of Ik.o1 S.rr.w,411 f.mr• �W.
rgrrr
I
G
y [
FKCWF
Plan 2 C. ..IL.r t....
a. boa 01.1.1
■. boa oc...le
"B." Elevations •°•a�a•�1•r•
G. boa allw{ .
• M. boa Coobl
r. sr.eeo r r.�Tr,.
.1. a.00ntlw Go.ch 4l pllt
{. IY.or.e1..!-TI1.W[1opYorr
L. a.oON[N.GW1.Welow.wr.
M. {tLla V.nL
a . 1
{ea. 1 1•�1..p. 64561T1AN
Green6riar w•-c
,taw w r.w
CILT of Gr.nd T.rr.w.C.11 lorol.
I
r
y
R MEMOMMOMMOM
. ...
H
000
A. �m
Plan 2 �.a.,TI1.....
"v" Elevations U. �""i1.
y . .,.d..t....t
r. ■i-4 Yul I.t•
- p ■wl ca.Jvr�
M. ■•.®C.rla11
O . plfat.l aY.J T�Iv UYllrw..r,•
L. tgrua.{ay.WLM Wr{.qNl•
.tilt Wt
p 1 r
TF1E
■�,p�'��w�.A.�� se.t.1 P t• p,
Green6riart�— ;
riLr.[QdW S.raan. GlaCucui. may."
i
�j��` � �r� .� �� cur Saar •�r�r tiv M:�r 'yam rur �� �� ' CatS",•I
f
- o
VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP
NO. 17766
FOR CONDOMINIUM.PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, TJill
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Pylrl�yAP
I
MAI
was
' - � l �... .' �l yK ' ,h'� a..- • y '^ .i- I I� `+• �a���s*,�/'v'irrr�7�sli twvi�
_� I �,at,,yf:, .1•.{ Y4. ,` •�: R. _ / I �• III �•.�� 1•A,•><ei "Ti7 ew—
1. r wi3tr?eRiG C...r..•-�.�.�.r'
} I, �•' 4 / .S't''r 4�•� lti,tt•.y_...�+ 14%mr. ti•.'v 2}y. j' + I I': ..,.i.u�—.�:..:r
J .. � i'/ r' Y T11 �r ♦^yl F•T 1 I- -1 �f —:i:n•
..r ,: l ._.Fic\ 1•r\t l[ } / ." y:t la„�.• S s\, Y- , 1 —'^'r.."i
� �t :'fir• r �,:. ,l f 1' . s —-7w -
LIM
=----=-=-- _-_-_ -, t-.c i Avr:, I -;► t�' { . r_--_ -, i�niiL�7ii�Ja�rarnstr——
.. 1�,ar� '�.:. ��.• 1. '+}F,•f^ 1't,'i 4a�,•�'^J ..-. i/Jd rarf�®• J'K"
I•t ''��•t � 1. 1�.�G. '
111 tZ \\• f ���`' :r ' s3 II
r� rr. 1 . "
'11I off•t'�;1 1. '• .• �'�•V .t i �. t ` 1.,, �•`. �1 t I .. d I 1 r M. a.`.
1 I
ogl IAM
....��..�' e 4• \ F I! i�ti i ' n.11 p4. I .•
I1 '` 1
juu _iQllfii
solrba f ra
.r.i'JMou
.'Q ....0.
--a ��•—
1 7 .. � �:r ram. .mow 1 •M,..
1 �.rrlYAl[O.li SfCrl°Y A-A fR.PNIf NI'AIl' j
- - - ---—-- Imo'
.rAiln
YEST/NC TENTATI —
_....._._ ...-_.._... .._.... IFUSCOE _
-- TRACT MAP
TRACT NO. 1779E
---. -.........._....._......_ - -- Ia.i %4:� PoR CONUowxivm PURPOSES nn
Atrr 1'a 1 �
1
--r—r...1 .,• 'y 1 - n:•'� I• t'.Y� .5��� k \�:. �. ralrRw S :-tS I nnoq ii I '1 I
.. •,\ 1`wl �.++� �,-tea,. !.� m � .r�.on.e t,r .n. rt r..m '. •: ] r�ra d i
___. � \ ,. / '. + ,�,.a �"�y.� I i•-`mn_ rw m. t�d^+ Fr.,nr .p.:., •-.: .^;99 •� t .
bwlc ISpoa R.,ww 'f � I 1 1 I - -
• .�•`t r.lNYatrr -- f S � `` .l. f - .'t!". .` �: t.-• i � .
• , 1
—
iw I
r--] `. \ " �+l g`a ail-._ _ t• r Kw- ,R?!'' ' '?+: - - F� • 1 6 "----t0-! • �11•-... _ 1 _ ! .,� � '
� ;;:, ..--.. _..___� � ,�.� • � �--- -_-=�i ' .���."� _j : : �" it ; : ! ! '��' - � � � ,; '�
o.rn..w�rwu rrv,..c.nn or.w.rrur r,d ran ru.
Awl
El
' ,.•xu,n usnr.r.r va 1 It'. I'Y.M 1
t ..... 1 FUSCOE
W . STUM. -_ `l �" -.ar ..,,,,rnn CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN �M - -
Green6riar
1 7P
cart
D ECEPA
OCT 42015 Community and Economic Development
MICHELLE F.BOUSTEDT Department
PlannincA—I muni
ty
Services DeP
DATE: September 21,2005
FILE NO'S: Specific Plan No.05-02, Site and Architectural Review Case No.05-19,Vesting
Tentative'Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766)and Environmental Review
Case No. 05-21
APPLICANT: The Greyston Group,Inc.and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel located on the
westerly side.of Mt.Vernon Avenue about 700 feet south of the intersection of Mt.
Vernon and Brentwood Street)
SUBJECT: This Project will consist of a total of a total of 35 condominium single family
residential units with attached garages for resident parking and open parldng for
guests.. The project will consist of two plans,a Plan 1 of 1,658 sq.&and a Plan 2
Of 1,771 sq.R. Each plan will have three bedrooms.
Dear Reviewing Agency:
The applicants are proposing to construct the above described project if approved by the City. The Specific
C Plan has been filed for the development standards of the project. The site and
applications has been filed to control thee'
Project design.. The vesting tentative map has been filed as this
will be a condominium type of project with individual ownership of each unit.The environmental review
application was submitted to satisfy the"CEQA"requirements for a discretionaryproject ofthis type. These
applications will be heard concurrently by the City,s Planning Commission. The specific plan and the
vesting tentative map will also go before the City Council if the Planning Commission recommends their
approval. Enclosed with this letter are copies of the proposed plane for this development including the
vesting
landscapingtentative tract map, preliminary grading Plan, site plan, floor plans, elevations, and preliminary
P
IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE ANY COMMMIS YOUR AGENCY MAY HAVE ADO 'HIS
PROJECT INTO THE 30-DAY COMPLETENESS REVIEW PE LE
IL
RESPECI'F ILLY REQUEST YOUR COMMENTS BY FRMAY OBER 14TR TOth
If you have any questions about this request or proposal,please do not hesitate to contact John Lampe
Associate Planner,with the Grand Terrace Community Development Department at(909)430-2247.
S' cere
ENS heI or* eb...,.+tr s O- 11r,d;1-:iv'
Lampe,Alsociad Planner
JL jl
/O-?-os—
Attachments: Various plans and exhibits for SP-05-02,SA-05-19,TTM-05-03 &E-05-21
CAMyFi1=U0HN%'i vrwn%&Wnq.hr
ATTACHMENT 14
22795 Barton Road-Grand Terrace,California 92313-52
Colton n joint Unified School District
Denim p. Byas,Superintendent
Robert Stranger, Ph.D.,Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
Alice H. Grundman, Director of Facilities and Construction
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Mr.David R.Zamora, President ENE
Mrs.Marge Mendoza-Ware, Via Pm. 0 EC
Joining Together to Co the Facts Mile
Mr.Robert D.Armenta, Cerk
Mr.Tobin A.Brinker (� 1 1 nD
Mr.Mark Hooves
20
Mr.Frank A. lbarra MICHELLE F. BOUSTEDT
Mr. Kent Taylor Plannir9'C.xnmunity
Services Department
October 3, 2M
John Lampe.Associatie Planner
City of Grand Terraces
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
RE: Tentative Tract Map 05-03 35 Condominium Units
Dear Mr. Lamps:
The Colton Joint Unified Scholl District Is In receipt of your transmittal for the above-
named project. The District is growing at a note faster than permanent school facilities
can be financed and butt. AN of our school faciiities are currently at or over capacity.
The District's current K 12 enrollment is 24,783 and is expected to continue to Increase.
In an effort to meet classroom needs,the.Board of Education has implemented year.
round schedules. and until adequate funding for facilities can be assured, the Disbict
wig continue io consider all alternatives fbr housing students.
In addition to General Obligation Bonds, Colton Joint Unified School District has
pursued other funding strategies Including the State School Facilities Program, and
mitigation agreements with developers, as well as Community Facilities Districts.
The proposed project Is currently within the boundaries of the foilovWng schools:
Current
School En
Grand Terraces Elementary School 704
Terrace Hills Middle Scholl 11105
Colton High School 3.555
1212 Valencia Drive-Colton,cA W2,j-I"S-(909)580-500 ATTACHMENT 15
•Commitmcnt to Equd Opportunity
do
Mr. John Lampe
October 3, 2005
Paps two .
The current walling distances are as follows:
K-6 1 moo or less
7-8 1 1/2 miles or leas
9-12 2 miles or less
The Dlstrid known how Irn
portent it is to have a Comprehensive curriculum, highly
ems, teachers and admint�h", and schools which are aooessible ad
oommunnyyneed�s and constructed with 9 a fiats to
We encourage the developer,of this project to contact the Dlstrid to
�releff"to the impact this.projad win have and how we can address these dbicuselms
the planning stage. G&ly
Please contad me if you have any questions or concerns.
$Incerely,
toe K Grundman
Dlrector. Facilities Planning 3 Construction
AHG.-cch
,
,
190.195.05
12/8/2005
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
(Grevstone Group,Inc.) t
11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue
SP 05-02 AR 05-19 TTM 05-03 (17766) ER 05-21
John:
Please note these conditions are just as they were the first time around exce t I added a
new COA (#13) and I modified the COA now shown as#17. And of course this
resulted in re-numbering all COA from #14 to#31.
Larry
COA
1. The Final Map shall be prepared in accordance with the subdivision map act.
2. The final map shall include an easement for the private street, for all publicly
owned facilities, and private utilities.
3. A Homeowner's Association shall be established for the maintenance of all on-
site open spaces,private streets,water quality facilities,drainage facilities,on-site
lighting, and the tract's Mt.Vernon Avenue frontage.
4. The CC&Rs shall be prepared and submitted for the City Attorney's review and ('
approval.
5. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding,the
applicant shall agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Condition"letter. The letter
form and content to be prepared by the Community Development.Departcment.
6. Provide a"will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water.Company.
7. A final tract map prepared by a registered civil engineer authorized to practice
land surveying,or a licensed land surveyor,must be processed through the City
prior to being filed with the County Recorder.
8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders
and encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract
map is released for filing with the County Recorder.
9. Prior to the final map approval,there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a
statement for the.water purveyor indicating the project is in compliance with the
fire Chiefs fire flow requirements.Final map shall be filed with the County
recorder and one(1)Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City
offices prior to the issuance of any building permits.
r
C:\DOCLI?�IVOHNLA 1\LOCALS—I\Temp\190.195.05 TRM-05-03 (17766) SP05-
02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07, 2005.doc ATTACHMENT 16
190.195.05
12/8/2005
10. The applicant and or owner shall provide a"Water Quality Management Plan"for
the project for review and approval by the City of Grand Terrace prior to the
issuance of Building Permits/Grading Permit. The WQMP shall conform to the
San Bernardino County Stormwater Program and as required and approved by the
Community Development Director. The project requires a WQMP by exceeding
the threshold as set by Category(2)Construction of 10 units or more of single
family residence,multi-family residents, condominiums, apartments, etc.; and(8)
the construction of Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more.
11. Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the applicant shall comply with the City
of Grand Terrace Stormwater System Ordinance(Ordinance No. 142, Subsection
1.010, 1993) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's NPDES
Permit for San Bernardino County as required under the Clean Water Act.
12..The applicant shall obtain all required clearances and/or permits from the Santa
Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to the issuance of any building
or Grading Permits.
13. The Stormwater 360 precast stormfilter shall be designed and submitted to the
SARWQCB for approvals. The HOA CC&Rs shall contain instructions for the
care, maintenance, and testing of the water quality facility, including,_but not
limited to any restrictions to landscaping fertilizers, nitrogen, and/or pathogens.
14. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in accordance with the
standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design Manual to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Drainage Study shall
include,but not be limited to,the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream
storm drain. The study shall include the design of all facilities required to
mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the satisfaction of the Director
of Community Development.
15. The developer shall demonstrate that all legal rights to drain storm water onto the
down stream properties to a sufficient outlet exist or the Developer shall obtain
those rights prior to the Final Map approval.
16.Prior to recordation the downstream sewer system shall be analyzed to insure
there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development..The study shall include
the design of all facilities require to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts
to the sewer system.
17. The developer shall obtain sewer easements for the construction of all required
downstream sewer improvements on private property and rights to utilize the
sewer capacity of privately owned downstream sewer mains prior to the Final
Map approval.
C:\DOCUME—I\JOHNLA—I\LOCALS—I\Teinp\190.195.05 TRM-05-03 (17766)SP05-
02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07, 2005.doc
190.195.05
12/8/2005
18. A preliminary soils report/Geotechnical investigation shall be prepared for the
project.
19. Prior to recordation a Grading Plan shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer based on
the recommendations of a Geotechnical Report.
20. All slopes over 4 feet in height shall be irrigated and landscaped.
21. Developer shall construct all missing public improvements along the frontage of
Mt.Vernon Avenue in accordance with City requirements.
22. Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer to design the facilities
required by the Drainage Study and the Sewer Study.
23. Prior to any work within the Public Right-Of-Way,improvement plans shall be
prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved by the City, and an Encroachment
Permit shall be obtained from the City of Grand Terrace.
24. All on-site and off-site curbs, gutters,paving, street lights, sewer laterals,water
services,utilities,grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed prior to
map recordation or a sufficient surety shall be posted to guarantee their
installation.
25. Unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development, all
planter areas shall be separated from parking and paved areas by a 6"concrete
curb.
26. All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt,concrete, or other
Permanent,impervious surfacing material as required by Section 18.60.040B of
the Zoning Code.
27. The on-site structural section for streets within this project shall be based on the
"R-value"of subgrade material after streets are brought to rough grade. The
Geotechnical Engineer,shall provide preliminary structural recommendations
based on the City's design standards for local streets.
28. The private Street Lights and parking lot lighting shall be designed to minimize
impacts to the adjacent residential units.. A lighting plan shall be prepared and
submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department
prior to the issuance of building permits. Night lighting for the buildings and
parking areas shall be designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and
public roadways. Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in
height as measured from the finished grade of the parking surface.
C:\DOCUNIE-I\JOHNLA-1\LOCALS-1\Teinp\lgo.195.05 TRM-05-03 (17766) SP05-
02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07,2005-doc
190.195.05
12/8/2005
29. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall submit a final
geotechnical report addressing conformance with the preliminary soils report and
a rough grade certification prepared by the Civil Engineer
30. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Developer shall construct all missing and/or
damaged public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works or provide a surety satisfactory to the
City.
31. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Developer shall construct all missing and/or
damaged public improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue.
C:\DOCUME-1VOHNLA-1\LOCALS-1\Temp\190.195.05 TRM-05-03 (17766)SP05-
02 ERC-05-21 Dec 07,2005.doc
TEP
P.O. Box 18355 phone.949 552 4357
lrvkw CA 92023 fax 909494 4408 t
e-mak bpirvk»@sbcgivbW.nat mobile.909 263 0383
Date: October 9. 2005
To: John Lampe. Associate Planner. City of Grand Terrace
From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer(TR1433)
Subject Comments on 35 unit condominium project
Location: 11830 ML Vernon Av.
Fie No: S.P. #05-02 and Architectural Review Case#Wig
1. Applicant should provide signing and striping plan for intemal dreuladon and project
access.
2. Applicant should confirrn that turn radl are adequate for internal circulation. Standard size
passenger vehicles should be able to make turns without encroaching Into opposing lanes.
3. Applicant should confirm that stopping sight distance at driveway on Mount Vemon Av. Is
adequate.
Transporbdon Enginaading and Planning,Ina
ATTACHMENT 17
TEP,M
P.O. Box 18355 phone:949 552 4357
Irvine CA 92623 fax 909494 4408
e-mail:tepirvine@sbcglobal.net mile:909 263 0383
Date: December 2, 2005
To: John Lampe, Associate Planner, City of Grand Terrace
From: Craig S. Neustaedter, Registered Traffic Engineer(TR1433)
Subject: Comments on Greystone Project
Location: 11830 Mount Vernon Ave.
File No: SP#05 02
I reviewed the response to my comments dated October 9, 2005 from Fuscoe Engineering .
concerning the above referenced project. The Fuscoe Engineering comments adequately
respond to my comments.
Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 18
MEMORANDUM
Building and Safety/Public Works Department Conditions of Approval
Date: October 10,2005
-- Applicant: The Greystone Group,Inc.
Address of Applicant: 341 Bayside Drive,Snits 7,Newport Beach,Ca 92660
Site Locations 11830 Mk Vernom Avenue,Grand Terrace,Ca
Telephone: 949-S66A23A
W.O.M.. 1241-S417
Provide two (2) of the following construction plans and information for review of the proposed
project.The plans you will submit to the Planning Department can be counted as plans by
Building and Safety. The Initial plan review usually will take three weeks on most projects once
Building and Safety receives the applicants package from the Planning Departaw, You will
receive a work order number at the time you submit plans for the proposed project A plan review
fee will be charged for reviewing the plans. This fee will be
submitted for review. es Permit few will also be charged for each at later dam when Plans are
the fees paid to the Planning Department, ' Then fees see 1°addition
Sets
(2) Title Report
(2) Record Survey
(2) Street Improvement Plans,to include curb,gutter,sidewalk,and Paving is .etc.
(2) Sewer Plans ng,street lights,
(2) Water Plana
(2) Architectural Plana
(2) Structural Plans
(2) Structural Calculations
(2) Plot/Site Plans
(2) Electrical Plans
(2) Electrical Load Calculations
(2) Plumbing Planst1sometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas.
(2) Mechanical Plans
(2) Mechanical Duct Layout Plans
(2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans
. (2) Title 24 Energy Calculation
Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMENT 19
. (2) Hydrology Study
(2 ) Geology Report
(2 ) Soils Report
(2 ) Grading Plan
(2 ) Precise Grading Plan
(2 ) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMp) or (SWEPP) and Erosion Control Plan lan For
(2 ). Temporary Construction Fence Plan
Buildine and 3atetv/Pnblie Wortin G formation
All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2001 California Bui1 Mechanical Code, 2001 Plumbing Code, and the 2004 Elect ding Co 2001
California.fornia. Design all st uctures to comply for Seismic Zone Electrical Code adopted by the State Of.
wind sped 70
MPII;exposure"C",
Dee DevelopedOwner is responsible for the coordination of the final
oper/Owner,shall obtain clearances from each went and division �. 1he
Seal building inspection from Building tit Safety,g,�agency shall sign the bottom of the �a
and Safety Job Card, ding
Building and Safety inspection requests and Public Works '
tron request can be mode twenty(24) bourn in advance for the next dayrnspec
inspection Please contact(909) 825-3825. You may also
request a inspecdon at the Building&Safety public counter at 22795 Barton Road,Suite"B' Grand
Terrace.
- Construction site shall be protected a securi
ty fence
maintained at all times to protect ped�ang, The fencing and screening shall be
Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction work
ers
a sanitary condition Construction toilet facilities of the n a_�such facilities shall be maintained in
ZA.3. type shall conform at ANSI
All construction materials which are not used shall be recycled Receipts
responsible for excepting am materials shall be from the recycle company
shall be given to the Cityin the construction office.Copies of the receipts
Inspector.. .
Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an electri
Building& Safety. No temporary electrical power will be c 1pennitfrom
following items ject
are in place and approved by Building and Safety and the PI unless one of the
8 Department.
(A) Installation of a construction trailer. or,
(B) Security fenced area where the electrical
power will be located.
Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. N
located in the public street right of way. o trailers can be
Publik Worlu �.'AndiHnn�
Page 2 of 4
1. Install concrete sidewalk extensions beyond the rear portion of a driveway approach
providing less than 2%cross fall for disabled access.
2. All work performed in the public right of way shall be in compliance with the Public Works
Construction Handbook. (Green Book)
3. Prior to permits,applicant shall pay,capital improvement which include,street park,storm
drain,circulation and traffic improvement fees.Sewer Assessment Fee District No. 1 CSA
70, shall be paid in full.
4. All on site utilities shall be shall be underground to each structure.
5. Street cut permits are required before work begins in the right of way. Submit plans for
review to the Public Works Department prior to sheet cuts.
6. Pursuant to Section 721.1 of the California Plumbing Code,an easements will need to be
established and recorded with the County Recorder for each property. Language will need
to be provided regarding the maintenance on the downstream sewer line. This language will
need to be part of the homeowner association.agreement and also be reviewed by the City
Attorney prior to recording the had map. G.T.M.C. Chapter 13.04, Section 140 and
13.04.160
7. All proposed public street improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed
pursuant to the Businesa Professions Code (
S. Storm water easements will need to be established and recorded with the County Recorder
for each property discharging storm water. Language will need to be provided regarding
maintenance of the downstream storm water facilities. This language will need to be part of
the homeowner association agreement and also be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to
recording the tract map. G.T.M.C.Chapter 13.20.
9. Public street improvements exist at right of way. Repair any damaged sidewalk, curb or
gutter due to damaged from construction.
10. Submit clearance documents from the servicing utility for the vault area next to public right
of way located on the front north side of the property.
Buildigg Perms;Conditlow
1. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, on site water service shall be installed and
approved by the responsible agency. On site Fire Hydrants shall be approved by the Fire
Department.No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the Fire Hydrants are
established and approved No flammable construction materials shall be placed on the site
without approvals by the Fire Department. All street and access roadways around the project
shall be paved for emergencyresponse vehicles before flammable materials are placed on the �
project
Page 3 of 4
Prior to
2. Issuance of building Permits, site Wading pad certifications shall be submitted
Building o and Safety from the engineer of record. Also,prior to concrete placement o mbm t
a certification for the finish floor elevations ,
and set backs.for each structure. The
certification need to reflect that the structure()are in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits,provide a certificate from the Colton Unified School
District stating that all xhool fees have been paid.
Prior to issuance of building Permits,Provide Building and
- Safety with a will serve letter,
from Riverside Hi �
ghland Water Company.(909)825-4128.
5. The property shall be connected to the public sewer service. Sewer fees sha11 be paid prior to building permits,
6. _ All consuuctio Prq" shall comply with the National Pollutant
Diwhqp
ystems, (NP ES). NPDES report shall be submitted with Elimination
Pml P at time of plan
7. Dumping of debris was witnessed years ago toward the rear of this
from the soils engineer on the abatement of the debris. 0��report
I
i
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
`cou-xn'
a�
OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
COMMUNITY SAFETY DMSION
620 South"E" Street—San Bernardino,CA 92415-0179
F9( )386-8463-(909)386-8466
Fax(909)386-8460
NOVEMBER 1.2005 EXPIRATION; NOVEMBER 2006
GREYSTONE GROUP -
341 BAYSIDE DRIVE,STE.7
NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660
FILE: MIS GT05/16168
LOCATION: 11830 MT VERNON AVE—GRAND TERRACE
PROJECT TYPE: SITE/ARCHITECTURE REVIEW
TRACT: 17768
PLANNER:JOHN LAMPE
Dear Applicant:
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, the San Bernardino County Fire
Department requires the following fire protection measures to be provided in accordance with applicable local
ordinances,codes,and/or recognized fire protection standards.
The following information of this document sets forth the FIRE CONDITIONS and GUIDELINES which-are applied
to this project.
Approved ®Approved w/conditions ❑Not Approved `
FIRE CONDITIONS:
Juria_n. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bemardino County Fire Department
herein ("Fire Department"). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire
Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current
Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes. codes, ordinances and standards of the Fire
Department.[F4]
Water Svstem. Prior to any land disturbance, the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for
this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using
Appendix IIIA of the Uniform Fire Code. Standard 903.1 iF-51
The Fire Flow for this project shall be:
1,250 GPM for a 2 Hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure.
Fire Flow based on 3.600 sa.fL Structure.
Fire The required fire fees (curirenft 1211A) shall be paid to the San Bernardino County Fire
Department/Commundy Safety Division (909)386-8465.This fee is in addition to fire fees that are paid to the City of
Grand Terrace. [F-40]
Access. The development and each phase thereof shall have a minimum of 2 points of vehicular access. These
are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes. Standard 902.2.1 [F-41]
i
ATTACHMENT 20
MIS GT05116168
November 1,2005
PAGE 2
Turnaround. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each r one hundred and roadway fifty (150)
feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet;all roadways shall not exceed a
12 % grade and have a minimum of forty five (45) foot radius for all turns. In the FS1, FS2 or FS•3 Fire Safety
Overlay District areas, there are additional requirements. Standard 902.2.1 [F-43]
Combustible Protection. Prior to combustibles, being placed on the project site an.approved paved road with curb
and gutter and fire hydrants with an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. The topcoat of asphalt does not have to
be installed until final inspection and occupancy. [F-44]
Nater System Residential. A water system approved by the Fire Department is required. The system shall be
.operational, prior to any combustibles being stored on the site.Detached single family residential developments may
increase the spacing between hydrants to be no more than six hundred (600)feet and no more than three hundred
(300)feet (as measured along vehicular travel-ways)-from the driveway on the address side of the proposed single
family structure.Standard 901.4 IF-54b]
Water System Certiflcatlon. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water
company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and
water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing
combustible materials on the job-site.
[F-57]
Street Sian. This project is required to have an approved street sign (temporary or permanent). The street sign
shall be installed on the nearest street comer to the project. Installation of the temporary sign shall be prior any
combustible material being placed on.the construction site. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the first
structure,the permanent street sign shall be installed. Standard 901.4.4 1[F72]
vdrant Markina. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified
j the Fire Department. In areas where snow removal occurs or non-paved roads exist, the blue reflective hydrant
marker shall be posted on an approved post along the side of the road, no more than three(3)feet from the hydrant
and at least six(6)feet high above the adjacent road. Standard 901.4.3. [F80]
Residential Addressina. The street address shall be installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum of
four (4) inches in height and with a one half(%:) inch stroke. The address shall be visible from the street. During
the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be Internally and electrically illuminated with a low voltage power.
source. Numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street. Where the building is fifty(50)
feet or more from the roadway, additional contrasting four (4) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property
access entrances. Standard 901.4.4 [F81]
Spark Arrestor. An approved spark arrestor is required. Every chimney that is used in conjunction with any
fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel are used, shall have an approved spark arrestor visible
from the ground that is maintained in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code.[F87]
Additional Comments:
1) Emergency access road shall be AC paving and the gate shall have an approved Knox lock.
2) Roadway leading to lots 11, 12, 13&.14 shall.be a minimum of 26 feet.
Sincerely,
DOUG CRAWFORD,Planning &Engineering Supervisor
San Bernardino County Fire Department
Community Safety Division
DC:ts
y�0• �-f�Gh
.f 1450 E.Washington St. • Colton,CA 92324-4696 • (909)825-4128 FAX(909)825-1715
coil
Vy
R` y
November 3, 2005
Mr. John Lampe
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Re: Green Briar Tract#17766
Dear John;
Riverside Highland Water Company has no problem with Tract #17766.
However, the developer does need to contact the water company regarding water
stock and other water related fees.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
6LL
Rich Haubert
Distribution Superintendent
RNWss
ATTACHMENT 21
Nov. 16. 2005 1 : 18PM SEQUOIA EQUITIES 925256378"0 NO, 3232—P.
3141111 NUMBS
November 14, 2005
City of Grand Terrace
Attn: Gary Koontz
RE: Grand Terrace land
Dear Mr. Koontz:
As owners of the Highlands Apartments we have reviewed the plans submitted
by the developer of the property which our apartment community surrounds, and
we are agreeable, subJect to our engineer's review of the final engineering plans,to allow fvr the connection of sewer and storm water drainage sysbenns
35 homes In question, into or on-site systems fior these utilitles. The proposes
fbr the
development's preliminary plans appear acceptable, and when their final plans
are complete, we look forward to reviewing those. Assuming they are in
accordance with all local and state design guldelines, we see no problems.
Further, we welcome the development of the 35 high u
as a welcome use for this site, which will greatly improve 4 ante single family homes
of this site. g by prove the current aesthetics
If you have any questions, please feel f-ee to contact us.
North Waterford Apartments,
a California limited partnership
By: Sequoia Equities via, LLC
a Califomla limited Llabllity Company Q`
Its: General Partner
i
8y: Mark S. rter
Its: Member Manager
New BVAW lowaft"M maxodemmW
CORPOV►rs OMCU- 3777 ftrWX0 D•Wn.8vin Soo wMxur CRIER,C&9099 ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 05
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
CASE NO.05-19,SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-24 AND
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CASE NO. 05-21 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 35 UNIT CONDOMINIUM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
CONSISTING OF A "PLAN 1" OF 1,801 SO. FT. AND OF A "PLAN 2" OF 1,8.28 SQ.
FT. WHICH WILL BE TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT COVERED UNDER
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-02 ON A 3.7 ACRE PARCEL AT
11830 MOUNT VERNON AVENUE, 750 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE
INTERSECTION OF MT. VERNON WITH BRENTWOOD STREET
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for the approval of Site and Architectural
Review Case No. 05-19 and Architectural Review Case No. 05-24 and Environmental
Review Case No. 04-21 to construct a 35 unit condominium single family residential
project; and
WHEREAS,the applicant has additionally applied fora tentative tract map,TTM-05-
03 (County No. 17766)for the condominium portion of this project to be considered by the
City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: and
WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held bythe Planning Commission
on Thursday, December 15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,
Article 6, Section 15070, the proposed project for 35 condominium units.qualifies for a
Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental assessment of this
project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-21.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The proposed project and uses, consisting of a 35 single-family,detached
type condominium units with appurtenant facilities is consistent with the
intent of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and the General Plan in that it
meets the standards of the Zoning Code as modified by Specific Plan No.
05-02
2. The locations and configuration of all structures associated with this project
are visually harmonious with this site and surrounding sites and structures,
that they do not interfere wit the neighbors' privacy, that they do not
unnecessarily block scenic views from other structures and/or public areas,
and are in scale with the townscape and natural landscape of the area. The
design and appearance of the 35 unit project will be consistent with the
1 ATTACHMENT 23
existing residential development in the area and the City. In addition,the site
will be appropriately landscaped to blend in with existing development and
the setbacks and landscaping of the project will proved a buffer and
transition to the single family homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon Avenue.
3. The architectural design ofthe development,its materials,and colors utilizing
earthtones are visually harmonious with surrounding residential development
to the north,west and south of the subject site. The design is both functional
for the proposed project and is consistent with the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code. Said materials will match existing materials and colors within the
adjacent residential areas.
4. The plan for future landscaping and open space provides a functional and
visually pleasing setting for the residential structures on the subject site and
is harmonious with the nearby and adjacent residential developments. The
proposed landscaping of the site will minimize any visual impacts to the
surrounding area.
5. Because the site is mainly vacant and undeveloped with no natural
vegetation and is not part of a hillside,there will be no indiscriminate clearing
of the property, destruction of trees or natural vegetation or the excessive
and unsightly grading of hillsides. Thus the natural beauty of the City, its
setting and natural landforms will be preserved.
6. The design and location of any signs associated with this project will, be
subject to the approval of a sign program to insure that the signs will be
consistent with the scale and character of the buildings to which they are
attached or otherwise associated with and are consistent with the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code.
7. Conditions of approval for this project necessary to secure the purposes of
the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and General Plan are made a part of this
approval as set forth in the accompanying Resolution of Approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 are hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed 35 unit condominium residential project shall be maintained
in conformance with the Site and Architectural Review Applications as
approved by the Planning Commission on December 15, 2005. All plans
shall be consistent in terms of property lines and other measurements.
Minor changes or clarifications may be made by. the Community
Development Director or his designee.
2. The proposed colors and materials to be employed shall be in substantial
conformance with the color and materials board and other exhibits shown at
the public hearing on December 15, 2005.
2
3. Pay all applicable development fees, park fees, and school impact fees.
4. All construction activity related to this project shall comply with the City
noise ordinance as stipulated in Chapter 8.108 of the Municipal Code.
5. All construction debris shall be collected and placed in appropriate
containers on a daily basis, and the construction site shall be maintained in
a neat and orderly manner.
6. All mechanical equipment forthis development shall be screened from public
view, and all rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened from view by
either the architectural features of the buildings or by screening to be
approved by the Community Development Director.
7. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations listed in the
memorandums from the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works in his
memorandum dated October 10, 2005.
8. The applicant shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the
County Fire Department, Community Safety Division, it its letter dated
November 1, 2005.
10. A decorative wall/fence shall be provided along Mt. Vernon Avenue. Said
wall/fence shall be setback 10 feet from the Mt. Vernon right-of-way line
excepting where this distance needs to be modified because of line-of-site
issues. A detailed fencing plan showing the design,appearance and location
of all fencing shall be submitted to and approved by the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of any building permits.
11. A precise grading plan with soils report shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading permit for this
project.
12. This project shall provide at least two covered parking spaces in a garage
and at least one open guest parking space for every four proposed units
distributed throughout the development.
13. Three copies of landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Director for review and approval. Said plans to be
prepared by a licensed landscape architect and-shall be in substantial
conformance with the preliminary landscaping plan exhibited at the public
hearing. Said plans to be submitted priorto the issuance of building permits
for the new construction. All landscaping and irrigation facilities shall be
installed prior to the final occupancy of the any residential building.
14. The proposed landscaping for this development shall include the parkway in
front of the site along Mt. Vernon Avenue. The developer or homeowner's
association shall be responsible for the maintenance of this parkway
landscaping.
3
15. The proposed open space lot in the middle of the proposed development
shall include some sort of active recreational amenities. A detailed plan of
this open space area shall be submitted to and be approved by the
Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building
permits.
16. No building or portion of a building shall be constructed within the 19 foot
setback as measured from the Mt. Vernon Avenue right-of-way excepting
for patio covers which shall be constructed of wood.
17. No building or portion of a building or structure shall be constructed closer
to the northerly, westerly or southerly property lines of the site than what is
shown on Exhibit 1 -the site plan of the proposed development. Exceptions
may be made for patio covers which shall be constructed of wood and for the
adjustment of the location of the buildings to accommodate the minimum 18
foot driveways required by Condition No. 18; however, in no instance shall
a structure be closer than 5 feet to any interior property line.
18. The driveways_in front of each individual garage shall have a minimum
length, as measured from the garage door to backside of the proposed
sidewalk or edge of the interior loop drive where there is-no sidewalk, of 18
feet. In addition, all garage doors shall be of the "roll-up"type.
19. Any signs proposed for this project shall be subject to the sign regulations of
the R3 Zone and to a separate sign permit application to be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department.
v 20. All parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt, concrete or
other permanent, impervious surfacing material as required by Section
18.60.040 B of the Zoning Code.
21. For any outside lighting proposed, a lighting plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the Community Development.Department prior to the issuance
of building permits. Night lighting for the buildings and parking areas shall be
designed to reflect away from nearby residential areas and public roadways.
Light standards on the site shall not exceed eighteen feet in height as
measured from the finished grade of the parking surface.
22. The developer shall pay the appropriate traffic impact fees as required by
City Ordinance No. 190 prior to the issuance of building permits.
27. All contractors working on this project shall acquire a valid City business
licence.
28. This approval for SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 shall not be effective until and
unless the accompanying Specific Plan No. 05-02 and Tentative Tract Map,
No. 05-03 are approved by the City Council and the final map is recorded.
No building permits shall be issued until the final map has been recorded.
4
29. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the
City of Grand Terrace Stormwater System Ordinance (Ordinance No. 142,
Subsection 1.010, 1993)and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board's NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County, as required under the
Clean Water Act.
30. A "phasing plan" indicating the proposed phasing and timing of the
development shall be submitted to and approved by the Director .of
Community Development prior to the issuance of building permits.
31. The approval shall not be effective until the developer/owner signs the
"Acceptance of Conditions"form that he/she is aware of and accepts all of
the conditions of approval as imposed by the Planning Commission at the -
conclusion of the public hearing.
32. This approval shall expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless
the applicant has filed for a building permit. In case the.applicant can not
comply with this deadline, then the applicant shall apply for an.extension of
the one-year prior to the original expiration date. Said time extension to be
granted by the Community Development Director. In conformance with
Section 18.63.100 of the Zoning Code, no additional time beyond two (2)
years from the date of the initial approval shall be granted.
33. Priorto the issuance of grading permits,the developershall submit an"export
plan"to the Community Development Director for review. Said "export plan"
shall indicate the days and hours in which dirt will be exported from the site
and shall also indicated the proposed haul route for the trucks exporting.dirt .
from the site. No grading permit shall be issued until the submitted "export
plan" is approved by the Director.
34. For"Unit 1"on the southeast comer of the site next to the open space.area,
the east side of the building facing Mt. Vernon shall be architecturally
embellished to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
Plans showing this architectural embellishment shall be submitted to and
approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of
any building permits
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace,
California, at a regular meeting held on the 15th,day of December, 2005.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
5
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Stanfill, Doug Wilson,
City Clerk Chairperson, Planning Commission
c:WyFilesUGHMGreystonelSA-05-19-05-24resolution
i
i
i
I
i
f
6
Bud Howell
11821 Mt Vernon Avenue
Mr. Howell states that he has lived atPY with
is address for man years
ha
the job that the Planning Commission as done. Mr. Howell s 'concerned writh they areas
that have red curbs for no parking and eels that it could pose as a problem in the future.
Most of the houses within the area hav alleyways with garages. The on
ly streets are for guests. Should the City decide to have no street parkingparking on the
homes, the single family residences with n the area will be greatly affected in front of these
Planning Director Koontz replied that th decisions of where the curbs are to be painted red
are the concern of the Community Servi s Department and the City Council.
ITEMS:
1. MINUTES Planning lington
mission Meeting Minutes of
Novembe005
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
MOTION PC-45-2005: Vice Chair made a motion to approve the minutes of
November 4, 005
Vice Chair Addington wanted to add that rior to voting on the final item, he wanted to note
the long pause prior to making his motion
MOTION VOTE Commissioner Comstock Seconded the.motion
PC45-2005: Approved 4-0- 1
Commissioner idney Abstained
2. MINUTES Planning Co mission Meeting Minutes of
November 17 2005
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
MOTION PC-46-2005: Vice Chair Ad ington made a motion to approve the minutes of
November 17, 2005
Commissione Comstock Seconded.the motion
MOTION VOTE
PC-46-2005: Approved 4-0-0-0
3. SP-05-02, SA-05-19,
SA-05-24, TTM-05-03
E-05-21: SP-05-02, SA-05-19, SA-05-24, Vesting Map TTM-05-03,
(County No. 17766) and E-05-21 to construct a 35 single unit
single family condominium project on 3.7 acres.
EXHIBIT 3 .
2
APPLICANT: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre parcel
located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue about 750
southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon Avenue and
Brentwood Street.)
RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive the staff report and testimony,
close the Hearing and approve the Resolution calling for the
approval of SA-05-19, SA-05-25 and E-04-21 and recommend
to the City Council the approval of the Resolution calling for the
approval of Vesting Map TTM-05-03 and the adoption of
Ordinance for SP-05-02.
Associate Planner Lampe greeted the Commission and presented his Staff Report. A
proposal has been made to construct a 35 unit single family residential condominium
project on a 3.7 acre parcel
The subject site is located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon. The property is located
approximately 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Brentwood Street and Mt. Vernon
Avenue. The site is presently occupied by a single family home that was built in 1922.
Also on the site is a swimming pool and various accessory buildings that were used for
agricultural purposes in the past. The house and the out buildings will be removed if this
project is approved.
The site contains numerous mature trees and slopes approximately 4 1/2% to the wes
The high point of the site is located along Mt. Vernon with a drop of about 25 feet to th a
westerly end of the property. In addition, there are substantial slopes on the perimeter
towards the Highland Apartments which are located to the north of the subject site. The
site is enclosed . on the westerly, northerly and southerly sides by the Highlands
Apartments. The average density of the project is 17 units to the acre.
The east side of Mt. Vernon is single family detached housing.in the R1 Zone. Mt. Vernon
Avenue is an 88 foot wide secondary highway and as shown on the City's Circulation
Element. It is presently developed with curbs, .gutters and meandering sidewalk on the
westerly side in front of the.subject site.
The subject site is located in the R3 or the Medium Density Residential Zone, and the
"MDR" (Medium Density Residential) category of the City's General Plan. The maximum
density allowed in the R3 Zone is 12 units per acre, with a bonus which would allow up to
15 units to the acre.
The proponents could have come before the Commission this evening for an apartment
project, with 12 or more units per acre under the existing R3 Zone. However, a
condominium type of project has been proposed with 91/2 units to the acre.
The site plans illustrates the proposed project consisting of 35 detached single family
residential units located throughout the development all the way to the westerly end of the
project. It will be serviced by a 26 wide drive in a loop configuration with one entrance off of
Mt. Vernon Avenue. The fire department has required that there will be a separate means
of access to the property located here for emergency purposes only.
3
The units will be set back about 19 feet from the Mt. Vernon right of way to the residential
structures. Also, from the westerly and northerly property lines, the setback .will be
averaging about nine feet.
The units will be setback ten to thirteen feet from the interior loop drive which provides
interior access to the property. The units will be sitting approximately ten to thirteen feet
back from the edge of the drive. The distance between units will be eight feet. A zero lot
line type of configuration will be provided but the spaces are not lots in the sense of the
Subdivision Map Act. Each buyer will be given the air rights to the actual unit itself and also
to the small yard surrounding each unit. The lot sizes will range from about 2,600 to 2,700
square feet or a little over 4,300 square feet in size. The average space size will be a little
less than 3,000 square feet per unit.
.Some of the units that will be fronting off of the interior drive setback about ten feet from the
drive, and some of the driveways providing access to each garage measure about fifteen
feet in length. Staff feels that this could pose a problem should one have a full sized car,
the vehicle could probably be backed out or at least block the proposed five foot wide
sidewalk which will be located on the outside of the interior loop. To avoid this problem, the
Staff is suggesting that the project be modified to some extent that the driveways have at
least an eighteen foot minimum depth as measured from the garage to the edge of the loop
or the outer edge of the sidewalk.
The total onsite parking will consist of a two car garage per unit with 70 parking spaces
located within the complex besides the garages. Also shown are two open guest parking
areas for guests or visitors with a total of 18 open parking spaces. This onsite parking
meets more than the minimum requirements for this project. In addition to that, there will be
additional parking for visitors in front of each garage.
There are two common open areas. The larger of the two will be 5,600 square feet and will
be located in the westerly center of the project. There is no speck active recreational
amenities shown for this area other than a proposed walkway across it. This will also be
the location of an underground detention basin which is part of the drainage system of the
project. The Staff has suggested that a condition be added that the developers supply
recreational plans to provide more active recreational amenities for the site. The secondary
location is at the southeast corner of the subject site which will be developed for additional
landscaping for the project.
At the present time, there is a five to six foot block along the southerly, westerly, and
northerly perimeters of the property separating the site from the Highlands Apartments .
project. This wall will be removed and replaced by a system of retaining, walls and a
screening wall which will be six feet in height. Interior fencing between the units will consist
of wood fencing approximately five to six feet in height with gates between each unit.
Along the Mt. Vernon frontage, the speck plan discusses fencing which will be enhanced
with pilasters along Mt. Vernon Avenue. The Staff is asking for a fencing plan to be
submitted as part of the approval package for this project.
Two floor plans have been proposed for the project. Plan One consists of a first floor
kitchen, living room, dining room and powder room. The second floor will have a master
bedroom and two additional baths and two additional bedrooms. Plan Two consists of a
similar floor plan as Plan One, but slightly bigger in terms of square footage for a total of
4
1,828 square feet. There is also an option to add a fourth bedroom with a total square
footage of 1,963 square feet.
The design concept of the project is that each floor plan will have three elevations to vary
the architectural style within the project. The specific plan talks about a theme of early 20th
century California Spanish bungalow style with low pitched roofs and barrel shaped roof
tiles to accent the character of the buildings. There will also be wrought iron shutters to
compliment the Spanish style. The Applicant did provide colored elevations for the three
alternatives schemes for each plan and are displayed for the Commission to review.
Also submitted with the packet was a preliminary landscaping plan. All of the proposed
trees will be 24 to 36 inch box trees.
Because this is a condominium project under the State Map Act, the Tentative Tract Mc,_
has to be filed under the County of San Bernardino, Number 17766.
As part of the Conditions of Approval is that a homeowners association shall be created
which will have the responsibility of managing and maintaining this development.
A conceptual grading plan was also submitted. The average grade from the easterly end of
the property and the westerly part of the property will be 5%. Maximum retaining wall
height will be about 10 feet along the southerly boundary of the subject site.
In addition, there will be about 25,000 cubic yards of earth that will be exported from the
site. The Staff is recommending mitigation of the amount of earth that will be exported from
what is essentially a residential site and are suggested that an approved export plan be
submitted with the City prior to the issuance of the grading permit to provide regulation and
the hours of the grading.
The storm water drainage system for the project has been reviewed in detail by the City
Engineer, and the City Engineer feels that the submitted plans prepared.by the applicant's
engineer are feasible.
The final part of the speck plan discusses that the project will be developed in phases.
Staff has added a condition that phasing for the project be subject to some regulation so
that there will be an assurance that the project will be completed in a reasonable amount of
time.
As part of the CEQA review, it is Staffs opinion that the project does qualify for a Mitigated
Negative Declaration, and that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project
will not have an adverse affect on the environment.
In making a recommendation, Staff has considered the following items: (1) This is a site
that has been zoned for moderate density development for 20 years. (2) The project is
consistent with the zoning under the City's General Plan. (3) The development will be an
attractive asset to the City; and (4) the project will provide a transitional use between the
apartments west of Mt. Vernon and the single family homes on the east side.
Based on the analysis, Staff is recommending to the City Council the approval of the
submitted Speck Plan and the approval of the vesting tentative tract map together with
the mitigated Negative Declaration, and that the Commission also approve the submitted
site and architectural review applications.
5
Associate Planner Lampe concluded that the Conditions. of Approval and the Site and
Architectural Review, one of the Conditions, Number 17 states that the setbacks along the
northerly, westerly and southerly property lines should be in agreement with what was
shown on the site plan with the exception of allowing patio covers to be built on the rear
yard setbacks. An exception needs to be added to the effect that the rear setback can be
modified to accommodate the 18 foot driveway length. To increase the driveway length,
the rear yards would have to be reduced to accommodate the change.
o
Also, Engineering sent a letter to Staff with regard to Condition 25 of the Tr
act Map
which required that the Applicant submit the proposed storm filter for the project to the
Water Quality Control Board for approval. The Applicant's engineer suggested a revised
language for Condition Number 25. The City Engineer was contacted and he did not have
a problem with the revised language noting the fact that there is language in that revision
that states that the storm filter would remain subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Associate Planner Lampe concluded his Staff Report.
Vice Chair Addington asked with regard to the revised Co
issue precise grading permits. ndition Number 25, does the City
Public Works Director Shields replied that the City does require precise grading permits.
Vice Chair Addington wanted more information about the section along the westerly
property line.
Associate Planner Lampe replied that the Applicant's Engineer has the information with
regard to that section of the project and will be presenting it before the Commission.
Chair Wilson opened up the Public Hearing.
David McMahon-Applicant
Greystone Development
341 Bayside#7, Newport Beach
Mr. McMahon introduced himself to the Commission and reported that he has brought his
Engineer along with his architect to answer any questions that the Commission may have.
John Olivier
Fescoe Engineering
16795 Von Karman, Irvine
Mr. Olivier greeted the Commission and reported that the Conditions of Approval were
reviewed and they are in agreement with the Conditions. With regard to the west wall at
the property line, a diagram has been issued to the Commission with regard to the area
showing the details of the storm filter drains and the storm drain system.
Vice Chair Addington asked Mr. Olivier does the 8 foot by 4 inch high outlet curb have the
capacity for the 17 to 18 CFS as proposed.
Mr. Olivier replied that the final engineering is working with the City.Staff to confirm those
calculations with regard to the outlet curb.
6
Vice Chair Addington asked if there is an emergency overland escape route should an
emergency occur.
Mr. Olivier replied that there is.
Chair Wilson wanted information with regard to the filtering agents that will be proposed.
Mr. Olivier replied that per the Water Quality Guidelines that a charcoal filter system will be
utilized.
Chair Wilson asked what type of curb will be proposed for the project.
Mr. Olivier replied that it will be a wedge curb.
Chair Wilson wanted more information with regard to the proposed sidewalks around the
entire project.
David McMahon Applicant
Greystone Development
341 Bayside Drive #7, Newport Beach
Mr. McMahon felt that it would be a nice addition to have sidewalks throughout the entire
project so that children may be able to ride their bicycles on the sidewalks rather than on
the streets.
Vice Chair Addington asked with the area along Unit 1, where the east wall facing'N_`-
Vernon Avenue, is this a proposed flat wall or a zero lot line wall.
Mr. McMahon replied that the architect could answer the question.
Albert Yolo-Architect
2031 Orchard Drive, Newport Beach.
Mr. Yolo replied that the side of the Unit is the active side where the larger windows and the
master bedroom would front that side.
Chair Wilson asked with regard to the retention basin, what type of drainage will be used.
John Olivier
Fescoe Engineering
16795 Von Karman, Irvine
Currently, a park element is planned in the area with 60 inch pipes underneath to take the
peak flow off of the main storm drain to divert it.
Chair Wilson asked if a Maxwell System was considered.
Mr. Olivier replied that it was not considered but can be checked with the soils engineer.
Chair Wilson asked if any discussion has been made with the fire department.
7
Mr. Olivier met with the fire department with regard to the requirement of the seconds
access. ry
Public Works Director Shields asked with regard to. the sheet that was passed out
the
Applicant's Engineer. In the event a 100 year storm presents itself and there would be
water going over the block wall, was there any concern of the water going directly into the
garages of the Highland Apartments. Is there any thought about putting in a head wall and
directing the flows towards the planter area and exits beyond the residences.
Mr. Olivier feels that it can be accommodated to increase the angle of the parkway culvert
to get the water flowing in the right direction. At this point, there is no objection to including
this in the Conditions.
Chair Wilson closed the Public Hearing and brought the item back to the Commission.
Commissioner Bidney asked if there are any amenities proposed for the project.
Planning Director Koontz replied that a Condition has been added to include some a of
amenity package. type
Vice Chair Addington asked if on street parking be allowed.or permitted within the project.
Planning Director Koontz replied that the fire department will not allow on street parkin for
a street that is at 26 feet. 9
MOTION PC-47-2005: Vice Chair Addington made a motion to add three ditions to
the project. The first Condition was to add Item 3'to add the
following Condition to SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 as presented by .
Associate Planner Lampe. The second Condition is to add the
revised wording for Condition 25 as presented by the Applicant.
The third Condition is to require architectural features along Unit
Number 1 at the easterly, portion of the property as seen from
the street.
Commissioner Bidney seconded the motion.
MOTION VOTE
PC-47-2005: Approved 4-0-0-0
MOTION PC-48-2005: Vice Chait Addington ade a motion to approve SP-05-02, SA-
05-Idin
5-24, M-05-03 and E-05-21 with the additional
conat we approved.
Come omstock seconded the motion.
MOTION VOTE
PC-48-2005: App -0-
8
Community and Economic Development Department
CAL IFORNIA
STD REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Specific Plan No.05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative-Tract
Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766) and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21) to
construct a 35 single family condominium development
APPLICANT: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre
parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue
about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon
Avenue and Brentwood Street.)
RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing on the proposed Specific Plan
and Vesting Tentative Tract Map; Receive any testimony;
Close the Hearing and Approve the Ordinance for Specific
Plan No. 05-02 for First Reading and Approve the
Resolution forApproval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
05-03
Background:
The applicants are requesting approval to construct 35 single family, detached,
condominium units with garage parking (total of 70 parking spaces) and 18 open guest
parking. All of the units will be.two-stories in height with a "California Spanish bungalow"
style. "Lot" sizes for the individual units will range from 2,676 feet to 4,341 square feet.
The average "lot" size will be about 3,000 sq. ft. A common open space area of about
5,300 sq. ft. will be located in the center of the development. The site will be accessed by
a single, non-gated vehicular entrance from Mt. Vernon at its southeast comer. The
internal street system will be provided by a 26 foot wide loop private street. There will also
be a 26 foot wide emergency vehicle access to provide secondary access to the interior
of the site. With a proposed density of 9.5 units per acre, the applicants believe this
proposed new development will act as a "transition" between the existing sinole family
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-52
EXHIBIT 4 1
homes on the east side of Mt. Vernon and the Highlands Apartments on the west side of
Mt. Vernon.
The subject site is presently.occupied by an older single-family residence and several
accessory buildings and structures which will be demolished for the new development.
The topography of the site slopes downward from east to west with a grade of about 4.5%. I
In addition, there are substantial slopes on the perimeter of the property with the steepest
being along the southerly boundary of the site. The Highlands Apartments which average
about 17 units/acre lie to the north, west and south and are, mainly, at a lower elevation
f than the subject site. The proposed project will be enclosed by a 6.foot high screening wall
and.a decorative fence with pilasters along Mt. Vernon. .
On December 15,2005 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the City
Council the approval of Specific Plan No: 05-02 (SP-05-02) and Vesting Tentative Tract
No. 05-03(VTTM-05-03). The Planning Commission also approved Site and Architectural
Review applications No.'s 05-19 and 05-24 (one for each proposed floor plan)contingent
upon the approval of the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Site and
Architectural Review applications were for the design and appearance of the individual
single family units.
It should be noted that the only requests that are before the City.Council are the proposed
Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the propos *
edl Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 to
subdivide the subject site. The two companion Site and Architectural Review applications,
SA-05-19 and SA-05-24 have already been approved by the Planning Commission'.
Specific Plan:
The site is located in the R3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone as is the surrounding
Highlands Apartments complex. The City's Zoning Code does not.contain an existing
zoning classification, including the R3 Zone, that would accommodate the proposed
project. Therefore, the applicants filed Specific Plan No. 05-02 to permit the requested
project to go forward with the proposed development standards.
The Specific Plan contains a detailed discussion of the proposed project including types
of uses, architectural styles, development standards to be employed, grading/drainage
discussion and proposed phasing. It also includes a description of the project setting, site
characteristics; surrounding uses and a statement as to the project's relationship to the
City's General Plan. As such, the submitted Specific-Plan meets the requirements of the
Govemment Code and will serve as the future zoning for the site.
A.copy of the proposed Specific Plan No. 05-02, as recommended for approval by the
City's Planning Commission, is attached here as Exhibit A.
Vesting Tentative Tract Mag•
This project is a proposed condominium development; therefore, the necessity for the
tentative tract map. The "vesting"portion of the map means that the rules and regulations
of the City at the time the filing of the tract map was deemed "complete"will apply to this
project. As a condominium project, only one lot is shown on the map. Individual buyers
will be purchasing"air rights"to their individual unit and not an individual lot: The"lot lines"
shown on the site plan of the project are akin to the lot lines In mobilehome development
and will not be recorded "lot lines" for subdivision purposes.
The proposed vesting tentative map shows such details as the existing development on
the site, existing utilities, adjacent streets, existing easements,the location of existing and
proposed storm drains, the proposed BMP (Best Management Practices) storm filter
(NPDES requirement) and a.proposed 8" sewer line. Also, the street sections for Mt.
Vernon and the private interior loop drive are shown.
The blue line copy of the vesting tentative tract map is attached as Exhibit 1.
In addition, for a detailed review of this proposal and the minutes of the Planning
Commission's public hearing on this matter, please see Exhibits 2 and 3 attached
to this.report.
Environmental Review:
After completing the Initial Study,a Mitigated.Negative Declaration has been proposed for
this project. The requirements of lawforthe Mitigated Negative Declaration have been met
including 'the mandatory public review period. This project qualifies for a Mitigated
Negative Declaration on the grounds that it will not have a significant adverse impact on
.the environment with the proposed mitigation conditions. The Mitigated Negative
Declaration proposed under E-05-21 for this project is attached here as Exhibit B.
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the
Ordinance for the Adoption of Specific Plan No. 05-02.(Exhibit 4) and the Resolution of
Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766) (Exhibit 5).
Respectfully submitted, Approved by:
Af Z
Jo mpe Gary L. oonfz
As oc' to Planner Community Development Director
JL:jI
Exhibits: Exhibit A - Spec c Plan No 5-02 (Document)
Exhibit B - Mitigate Nega ' e Declaration and Initial Study, E-05-21
Exhibit 1 - Vesting T to a Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766)
Exhibit 2 - Planning Co mission Staff Report for 12/15/05
Exhibit 3 - Draft Minu s the Planning Commission Meeting of 12/15/05
Exhibit 4 -Ordinan Appro ' g and Adopting SP-5-02
Exhibit 5 - Resolu ' n of Appro I of Vesting Tentative Tract.No. 05-03
OMyFiIesUGHN%Greystone%sP-05-02councilrpt
RAMP rent c Community.and Economic Development
Department
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: March 9, 2006
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Specific Plan No.05-02(SP-05-02),Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 05-03 (TTM-05-03/County No. 17766) and
Environmental Review Case No. 05-21 (E-05-21) to
construct a 35 single family condominium development
(Continued from the meeting of January 26, 2006)
APPLICANT: The Greystone Group, Inc. and Sequoia Equities
LOCATION: 11830 Mt. Vernon Avenue (An approximately 3.7 acre
parcel located on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue
about 750 feet southerly of the intersection of Mt. Vernon
Avenue and Brentwood Street.)
RECOMMENDATION: Open the Continued Public Hearing on the proposed
Specific Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map;. Receive
any testimony; Close the Hearing and Approve the
Ordinance for Specific Plan No. 05-02 for First Reading
and Approve the Resolution for Approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03
Background:
The first public hearing for this project was held on January 26, 20006 and was continued
to a future Council meeting in order to allow the staff to work with the applicants to address
several concerns raised at the public hearing. These concerns consisted of the following
items:
1. Traffic Study
2. Wood fences- vs. block walls on the perimeter of the project.
3. Need fo more opens space and recreation facilities.
4. On-street parking problems. .
5. Offsite drainage through the Highlands apartments
6. Need for lighting plan.
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92al'3_52.95 n EXHIBIT
The staff met with the applicants on two occasions following the January 26' public
hearing. We also contacted the City's Traffic Engineer who responded in writing as to the
necessity for a traffic study. The following discussion is based on those meetings and the
response from the City's Traffic Engineer.
At the January 26 public hearing, the necessity of a "traffic study" was raised mainly
because of the number of bedrooms proposed for this development. The City's Traffic
Engineer indicated in a memorandum dated February 13, 2006 that "a traffic impact
analysis is not required"even taking into consideration the number of bedrooms proposed.
A copy of this memorandum is attached to this report. (Please see Attachment 1A.)
Additionally, Mr. Craig Neustaedter, the City's Traffic Engineer, will be present at the
continued public hearing to answer any additional questions regarding traffic issues.
Regarding the fencing and block wall on the perimeter of the project, the applicants have
indicated that they are proposing a 5 foot high, white vinyl fence on the perimeter of the
site. In some locations,this vinyl fence will be located on top of a block retaining wall. The
applicants have indicated that they feel the white vinyl fence will break-up the appearance
and height of the perimeter retaining wall and fencing, especially along the southerly
boundary of the project where the retaining wall and fencing will have an average height
of about 10 feet. The proposed vinyl fence and retaining wall are shown on Section "B"of
Attachment 2A. Also shown is the proposed 5 foot high precision block wall with split faced
pilasters along Mt.Vernon on Section "A" of Attachment 2A
For the proposed recreational facilities, the applicants have prepared a detailed plan
showing a "tot lot"for the open space area in the middle of the development. The "tot lot"..
is shown on Attachment 3A included in this report. In regards to the amount of open space
for this development, the applicants will make a short presentation to show how this
proposed development is similar to other developments in Southern California where
similar layouts have worked.
The amount of parking provided for this development will greatly.exceed the amount of
parking required by the City's Zoning Code. Each unit will have two spaces in a garage
and two additional open parking spaces in front of the garage. In addition, there are two,
open parking areas on the north side of the interior island area, near the open recreation
area, and on the east side of this interior island area. This parking will serve the needs of
guest or visitor parking. The total amount of open parking in these two areas is 18 spaces.
Given the number of parking spaces provided per unit (two in the garage and two on the
driveway in front of the garage)and the 18 spaces in the two guest parking areas, the total
amount of parking provided will be 158 spaces. The amount of parking required under the
Code is 79. So,the amount of off-street parking is exactly twice what is required by Code.
(158 . 2=79)In addition,the applicants have provided a drawing,Attachment4A,showing
the parking layout for the project.
Regarding the drainage for the site and the effect on the downstream Highlands property
to the west, the applicant's engineer will be present to discuss in detail how this drainage
system for the development will work. It should also be pointed out that the City Engineer
is satisfied that the proposed drainage system will work.
Lastly, the applicants have provided staff with a lighting plan for the development showing
that there will be five(5)lighting standards distributed throughout the development around
;I
the middle island.(Pleases ee Attachment 5A for the streetlight drawing.) In addition,.one
of the conditions of approval for the Site and Architectural Review requires the submittal
of an exterior lighting plan. _ Staff feels that this will be adequate number of lighting
standards to provide interior lighting to the project.
The Planning Commission's and staffs recommendation remains the same as for the
January 26" meeting that this development be approved.
r_ For reference and continuity, Staff has also provided a copy of the Staff report from the
January 26th meeting along with the Exhibits for that report. The proposed Ordinance for
the Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the proposed Resolution of Approval for the Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 are labeled Exhibits 4 and 5 respectively,
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the
Ordinance for the Adoption of Specific Plan No. 05-02 (Exhibit 4) and the Resolution of
Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766) (Exhibit 5).
Respectfully submitted, Approved by:.
t
JA Lampe Gary e Koontz
As ciate Planner Community Development Director
GLK:JL:jI
Attachments: Attachment 1A - Memorandum from City's Traffic Engineer dated 2/13/06
Attachment 2A- Section"A"and Section"B"showing proposed walls/fences
Attachment 3A -Tot Lot Exhibit provided by the applicants
Attachment 4A - Site Plan showing parking layout for the development
Attachment 5A - Street Light Exhibit provided by the applicants
Attachment 6A- Staff Report dated 1/26/06
Exhibits: Exhibit A - Specific Plan No. 05-02 (Document)
Exhibit B. - Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, E-05-21
Exhibit 1 - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (County No. 17766)
Exhibit 2 - Planning Commission Staff Report for 12/15/05 .
Exhibit 3 - Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of 12/15/05
Exhibit 4 - Ordinance Approving and Adopting SP-5-02
Exhibit 5 - Resolution of Approval.of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 05-03
c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Greystone\SP-05-02councilrpt.continued
TEP Sm
P.O. Box 18355
phone:949 552 4357
Irvine CA 92623 fax:909494 4408
e-mail: tepirvine@sbcglobal.net mobile: 909 263 0383
February 13, 2006
To: Gary Koontz, Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace
From: Craig S. Neustaedter, City Traffic Engineering Consultant
Subject: Greenbrier Project (Specific Plan #05-02) Traffic Impact Analysis
The following is my response concerning the recommendation to have a traffic impact
analysis prepared by the applicant for the Greenbrier Project:
The proposed project includes 35 single-family dwelling units. The project site is located
west of Mount Vernon Ave., south of the intersection with Grand Terrace Road/Canal Street.
Project access will be taken from Mount Vernon Ave..
Based on ITE trip generation factors, it is estimated that the project will generate 26 trips in
the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 35 trips in the typical weekday p.m. peak hour. The
average weekday two-way trip generation for the project is estimated at 335 trips.
The project trip generation has been questioned because many of the Greenbrier units will.have four bedrooms. The ITE trip generation manual does not discuss whether or not the
rate data for single family dwelling units is appropriate for units with four bedrooms. Given
that the ITE trip generation manual is silent on this question, it is possible that the predicted
project trip generation may be slightly low. However, it is extremely unlikely that the
forecasted project trip generation would be.more than 25% greater than the estimates cited
above.
The two major intersections most adjacent to the project site are Mount Vernon Ave. at Grand
Terrace Road/Canal Street and Mount Vernon Ave. at Barton Road. All trips going to and
from the project site will pass through either one of these two intersections.
The following table summarizes the estimated contribution of traffic generated by the
Greenbrier Project to these two intersections.
Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Mount Vernon at: Project Inter. %age Project Inter. %age
volume* volume volume* volume
Grand Terrace 16 627 3 22 1076 2
Barton 16 2258 .7 22 2874 .7
*Project volume assumes 25% increase for four-bedroom units.
Both of these intersections have recently been analyzed as part of the circulation
privatization study that TEP has completed for the city. The results of this study show that
Transportation Engineering and Planning,,Inc.
ATTACHMENT lA
currently Mount Vernon at Grand Terrace Road/Canal Street operates at level of service
(LOS) A in the a.m. peak hour and LOS B in the p.m. peak hour. The intersection of Mount
Vernon at Barton Road operates at LOS C in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hour.
The study also shows that the intersection of Mount Vernon at Grand Terrace Road/Canal
Street currently warrants signalization. This improvement is currently needed, and is not
attributable to future impacts of the Greenbrier Project. However, if this project is approved it
will be required to pay the city's development impact fee for circulation improvements. A
portion of these fees may be earmarked for construction of the traffic signal.
Based on the information detailed above, it can easily be concluded that the Greenbrier
Project would have no significant traffic impacts. A traffic impact analysis is not needed.
i
I
Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc.
pvo
ti..
MAPrMCNY9
nroroxv
i�mx r exnPn� MOM
cArrol[r GArP
VNWJLP'eerr°.r
c--_c- _--_ PROMMDOWU
R[rlA%SWALI. S.18
ernriAomwe I cJ
5EG7-10N'D'
C:�I
U
rjj ��`v J,1 � � � � .Z ' KF'•a #"SrP �i �k>i� >:rY„�'' S�;'�, � q l fir!�i t>' ;. e a �u_ .
PRIOPOiw
i
nons
H
^� PROPO9rDT I1W - - - -- - - --
` ` PRCG910NDLLGKW Wlrn llfMDIRJAr7--VlWNK -- - - - _ rXbnNav
�lf.Jf PAGCD//LM l R', I a'DLINALK �
rx�riN� q,gt
N MOUNT VlffkNON
5EcriON'A
CONCEPTUAL TOT LOT DIAGRAM Play structure Spring Riders Rubber Play Surface
t
3
-
1
. r
ste of # .- d.._.•...._ '�;,f� .,3�''
f
t 1_. -ry`�1 : n ...'�� 7`�`✓ qua 4 a k S � {{�ha J �1�F0'�fyr'� � q �` "`'(iititNu:'P •ta"a!fii>WCeft4 ayJ t F'�N'�rita I�,rl .rr �'yyuo.uv✓.�,.� -� ,IT
1
r;lir•drl. � � {
\• i\ ti a fa rt ,
.r""
r,.a '•t .. t
.Y r
h {{
f ,
•
TOT LOT EXHIBIT
TH
FTI x+ `tNkR�, aanN
hr++�IMM
�y RC1U P C]ree n 6 ri a r -incta�-•••
1� �la
Clcy of tlnnA T....ta, CUitorn+• mom
... ... oxwow
7 }!q
y
' II II
pF may, d' ,.d11EREfE(r ra�_, a
ti y,� s�.:zaxsu3axxam,ymaz� /
rry��d+ .r°xiv`�• (�i dJ�'�a �t I a'°
•\;,�' 'Y �,xr �r�j ^c. ,•,,,h3 i� � � �y:,r, Y�.. yp��y�J:.
'`,� '✓ a'�aJ°'�. 0 r, � ,:p,¢,,/',p, _,y�ux3'� ,i�• i}�5r i:.1 �•7PT'J�"` Z±^ p� �vEr, u� J l �}�-'„y ,�y•�11�
�/a�°"'; L' .✓. 637"'.: ..�,J»',„.• 'e+�. ��"..;�l,d `M
t •.Y rr �i ✓ l
�
zyrryF t 1 w i .. ,.X `` '�u"aer ,v; j,'¢asso-a. ar•116 �e�enm.: 4;7x>r nr
M ,
► tux 0. l." d P
�.Y
eunhl�a4.laeml.l
I
t
I f
So
mple Image for m,�0•°°�\ N.
Neighborhood Ughf polo rN .........
Ilny
i
f sr^ ,err
T
Y ppMl
'4hpnK NGIIUmlllal 1 r Yfiay��IMd
F
lh:
wopo•ou Ullifoau..,y� t -
g
4 I ,
a .
' I I � 1 I I I i.i ■■
NOHTPI
f: fff
• STREET LIGHT EXHIBIT ell•11111{Ilnoldonllnl \-Proposed street light placement \
In.n1Vhl 1"awll 011410"pi e..Us hw nW.1.lY•NnI poPGNd
IIINI phi bG011G111 Iq hN100�.41.well 1plrorg,.lexl poN llpplll,
Apnm Oylp41,an0 tMGT Fpl.00 cplillgnl WNW Pw o IcN sid eti cinGov .
TH IY IM.hD .1 pnN mmorwl.qundw o•.mn
p DNIId Cnonm opNx n.
aj�ylet, iYq MSf+EP➢Ml
ROUT
14 Iy,�Xp�� Stele:1^`•Yp' 0. ^ •n1�+11!,1tlA111.11111N
100Y� Grccn6 riar r.wr.r�
city or Grand Toruxo, c.11lo.nt. IlII,lAi..p.111R1E1
...ueeeeellt�e._ naaiy
H -
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 05-02 (SP-05-02) FOR A CONDOMINIUM
SUBDIVISION WITH 35 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ON
A 3.7 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF MT.VERNON.AVE.
AT 11830 MT. VERNON AVE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
CASE NO. 05-21 (E-05-21)-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed the necessary applications including four Site and
Architectural Review cases and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to create 35 single family detached
condominium units; and
WHEREAS, there is no existing zone in the City's Zoning Code to accommodate the
proposed development; and
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan also requires the filing of a.Specific Plan for any
residential project with more than 20 units; and
WHEREAS,Section 18.90.040 ofthe Zoning Code allows for the adoption of a Specific Plan
for those unique properties where the existing zoning provisions are unique or unusual; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is an infill site left after the Highlands Apartments developed
to the north,west and south; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project will represent a transition between the Highlands
Apartments on the westerly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue and the single family residential on the
easterly side of Mt. Vernon Avenue; and
WHEREAS,the resulting density of this project at 9.5 units per acre is not inconsistent with
existing development in the area including the large apartment complex,the Highlands Apartments,
immediately to the north,west and south; and
WHEREAS,Specific Plan No. 05-02,.Exhibit A,is consistent with the General Plan of the
City of Grand Terrace; and
WHEREAS,in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,
an environmental review for Specific Plan No. 05-02 has been conducted and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared under E-05-21 for this project with the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (Exhibit B) having been considered by both the Planning Commission and the City
Council; and
EXHIBIT 6
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held properly noticed public hearing on this project
on December 15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following the conclusion of the public hearing on
December 15, 2005 recommended that the City Council approve Specific Plan No. 05-02 and the
associated Mitigated Negative Declaration under Environmental Review No. 05-21, set out in the
attached.Exhibits A and B,by adopting this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission in taking the above action found that the.proposed
Specific Plan No. 05-02 will not be:
1,. Detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons
residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within
the city; or
2. In to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
WHEREAS,the City Council held a properly notice public hearing to consider the Planning
Commission's recommendation and other relevant testimony on January 26, 2006,March'9,2066
and April'l3, 2006 for SP-05-02 and E-05-21.
NOW, THEREFOR, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Specific Plan No. 05-02 to allow for the development of 35 single family
detached condominiums, set out in full in Exhibit A,is hereby approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace.
Section 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration on file in the offices of the Community
Development Department under E-05-21 is hereby approved as Exhibit B.
Section 3. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the 31S`day of its adoption.
- I
Section 4 Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three(3)
public places within fifteen(15)days of its adoption, as designated for such j
purpose by the City Council.
I
Section 5 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace held on the 13 day of April, 2006 and finally adopted and ordered
posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 27`''
day of April, 2006.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof
I,BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the April 13, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
,NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: r
Brenda Stanfill
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John Harper
City Attorney
c:\MyFilesVOHN\Greystone\sp05-02ordinance
RESOLUTION NO. 05_
RESOLUTION BY THE,CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 05-03 (TTM 17766)FOR A 35
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT IN
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
WHEREAS, the applicant, The Greystone Group Inc. and Sequoia Equities, has applied for the
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(TTM 17766)to create a 35 unit condominium subdivision
on a 3.7 acre parcel in the City of Grand Terrace; and,
WHEREAS,the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.05-03(County No. 17766)was deemed
complete on December 8,2005; and
WHEREAS,a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December
15, 2005; and
WHEREAS,under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),Article 6,Section 15070,the
proposed project for 35 condominium units qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration in that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. The environmental
assessment of this project was completed under Environmental Review Case No. 05-21; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03
(TTM 17766)to the City Council at its meeting of December 15,2005; and
I�I
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on January 26, 2006, 1
March 9,2006 and April 13,2006 regarding the approval of Tentative.Tract Map-05-03 (TTM 17766).
i
NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements is consistent with the General Plan in that the overall density and lot
size conform to the General Plan and that all required improvements will be provided; I
and
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development in that
the site is fairly level, is served by adequate public services and utilities and the
project conforms to the provisions of the existing zoning; and
3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidable injure fish or wildlife
or their habitat in that this is an urban infill project with no wildlife habitats on the
site; and
EXHIBIT 7.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems in that all necessary public utilities and.services will be
provided; and
5. The proposed subdivision, its design, density and type of development and
improvements conform to the regulations of the City's Development Code and the
regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law in that the proposed
development conforms to the Medium Density Residential Category of the General -
Plan and the Zoning as established by Specific Plan No. 05-02.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Tentative Tract Map No. 05-03 (TMM 17766)is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
General Conditions of Approval: .
1. Details shown on the tentative tract map are not necessarily approved. Any details which are
inconsistent with requirements of ordinance,general conditions of approval,or City policies
must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals
2. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
3. As a vesting map,this request was deemed complete on December 8,2005.
Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval:
4. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant
must agree to and sign the"Acceptance of Conditions"form. The content of the form to be
prepared by the Community Development Department.
5. Provide a"will serve"letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company.
6. Monumentation of tract map boundaries, street centerline and lot*boundaries is required
7. A final tract map prepared by,or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized
to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor,must be processed through the City
prior to being filed with the County Recorder.
8. A preliminary subdivision guarantee is required showing all fee interest holders and
encumbrances. An updated title report shall be provided before the final tract map is released
for filing with the County Recorder.
9. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map.
10. Submit a preliminary soils/geotechnical report prepared by a California registered civil
engineer.
11. Prior to final map approval,a grading plan shall be prepared by a civil engineer based on the
recommendations of soils/geotechnical report.
12. Prior to the final map approval,the developer shall submit sewer plans to the City for review
and approval. All residential units within the proposed condominium subdivision shall be
served by the public sewer system.
13. Prior to final map approval, a drainage study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer in
accordance with the standards of the County of San Bernardino Hydrology and Design.
Manual to the satisfaction of the City. The Drainage Study shall include,but not be limited
to,the evaluation of the capacity of the downstream storm drain. The study shall include the
design of all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the
satisfaction of the City.
14. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall demonstrate that all legal rights to drain storm
water onto the down stream properties to a sufficient outlet exist or the Developer shall
obtain those rights prior to the final map approval.
15. Prior to final map approval,the downstream sewer system shall be analyzed to insure there
is sufficient capacity for the proposed development. The.study shall include the design of
all facilities required to mitigate downstream deficiencies and impacts to the sewer system.
16. Prior to final map approval,the developer shall obtain sewer easements for the construction
of all required downstream sewer improvements on private property and rights to utilize the
sewer capacity of privately owned downstream sewer mains.
17. Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer to design
the facilities required by the drainage and sewer studies
18. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall construct any and all missing public
improvements along the frontage of Mt. Vernon Avenue in accordance with City
requirements.
19: Prior to final map approval,improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer for any
work in the public right-of.-way and shall be approved by the City; and the appropriate
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City prior to commencing any such work.
20.. Prior to final map approval,all on-site and off-site curbs,gutters,paving,street lights,sewer
laterals,water services,'utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or
sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation.
i
I
21. Prior to final map approval,plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be
submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall
submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the
subdivider has entered into..a contract a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing
payment and installation of the water improvements.
22. Prior to the final map approval,there shall also be filed with the City Engineer,a statement
from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire Chief s fire flow
requirements.
23. The project shall be used only for residential uses. Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions
(C, C&R's)shall be recorded as part of this tract. As a minimum,these C, C&R's shall
include the provisions for the establishment of a"Homeowner's Association." The C, C&
R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and City Attorney for
review and approval prior to recordation.
24. The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions(C,C&R's)applicable to the project property
Shall be consistent with the terms of this map and all City Codes. If there is a conflict
between the CC&R's and any City Code or this map,the City Codes or this map shall prevail.
25. Prior to a precise grading permit being issued,a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)
will be submitted to the City for review. The City shall approve the WQMP prior to granting
of a precise grading permit for the proposed development. The WQMP shall include current
documentation and/or evidence of the use of the proposed Stormwater 360 precast stormfilter
as approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board for use in development projects. The use of
the Stormwater 360 precast stormfilter or equivalent will also remain subject to approval by
the City Engineer. At the City's discretion, the City Engineer may opt to consult with the
Regional Board for verification of approved projects using similar structural devices for
water quality treatment.
Conditions After the Final Map Approval:
26. Final map shall be filed with the County recorder and one(1)Mylar copy of the filed map
shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. _
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,California at a regular
meeting held on the 13'h day of April,2006.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and
of the City Council thereof of the City Council thereof
Approved.as to form:
City Attorney
John Harper
C:\MyFilesVOHN\Greystone\TM-05-03resolution.rev.2
�1Ty
RAND TERR C
Community Services Department
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2006
CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X)
SUBJECT: EMERGENCY ROOF REPAIR
(X) FUNDING REQUIRED
BACKGROUND
The flat roof area above the City Clerk's office is leaking causing damage to the walls and wood railings.
The flat roof portion is the original roof which was installed in 1985 when the Civic Center was built.
Last year, the city staff contracted with Corona Coatings to coat the Fire Station and the Senior Center
flat roofs with a poly urethane foam and elastomeric acrylic coating. Both the Fire Station and the Senior .
Center have been very pleased with the coating that sealed the roof from any leaks and reduced the
temperature of the buildings during the summer.
Staff contacted Corona Coatings of Colton and F&M Foam for bids for the flat portion of the Civic
Center roof. Below are the bids:
• Corona Coatings $23,908
• F&M Coatings $32,382
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving an additional appropriation from the General Fund for$23,908 and awarding
the contract to Corona Coatings of Colton.
OCUMrIC-L
n