2017-32 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-32
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING A
BOND PROCEEDS EXPENDITURE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
FORMER COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FORMER COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY TAX ALLOCATION BONDS
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand
Terrace, ("Redevelopment Agency") was formed for the purpose of revitalizing areas
within the City of Grand Terrace pursuant to Health and Safety. Code (HSC) Section
33000, et. Seq.; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1X 26, enacted on June 28, 2011, and
Assembly Bill 1484, enacted on June 27, 2012, (collectively the "Dissolution Act"), the
Redevelopment Agency was dissolved on February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2012, the Grand Terrace City Council adopted
Resolution No. 2012-01, pursuant to Part 1.85, of the Dissolution Act, by which the
City Council elected to serve as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency
upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency underAB 26 ("Successor Agency")
j commencing on February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34191.4(c), after a
successor agency has received'a finding of completion from the State Department of
Finance ("DOF"), a successor agency, with the approval of its oversight board, may
list enforceable obligations to expend excess bond proceeds on its Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS"), so long as such expenditures are consistent
with the bond covenants; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency received a Finding of Completion from the
DOF on May 9, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency submitted a Last and Final Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS); and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has excess bond proceeds in the amount
of $2,026,585 from the. 115,175,000 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency's
Community Redevelopment Project Area 2011A Tax Allocation Bonds" which are
covenanted redevelopment purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace and the Successor Agency to the former
Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency have approved execution of the Bond
Proceeds Expenditure Agreement in order to have the excess bond proceeds in the
amount of$2,026,585 held by the Successor Agency transferred to the City so that
2017-32 CC Reso Page 1 of 9 October 24, 2017
these excess bond proceeds can be expended for redevelopment purposes in a
L
manner consistent with the applicable, bond covenants and Dissolution Act
requirements.
3
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the above recitations are true and correct
and, accordingly, are incorporated as a material part of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. The Bond Proceeds Expenditure Agreement, incorporated herein as
Attachment A; is hereby approved and adopted in substantially the same form as shown in
Attachment A by the City Council.
SECTION 3. The City of Grand Terrace and the Successor Agency are hereby
authorized to execute said agreement subject to the approval by the Department of
Finance.
SECTION 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been
satisfied.
SECTION 5. The respective executive officers of the City of Grand Terrace and the .
Successor Agency are hereby directed to take all necessary and appropriate acts to submit
the Excess Bond Expenditure Agreement to the California Department of Finance, State
Controller's Office, San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, and any other applicable
agency: The executive officers are further authorized to perform all acts necessary and
appropriate which may be required by the California Health & Safety Code. This includes,
but is not limited to the requirements set forth by the California Department of Finance, the
San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller, or any other applicable agency.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of October, 2017 by the
following vote:
i
D`a y Mc aboe yor
ATTEST:
Debra Thomas, City Clerk
2017-32 CC Reso Page 2 of 9 October 24, 2017
1
Attachment A
Bond Proceeds Expenditure Agreement
October 24, 2017
2017-32 CC Reso Page 3 of 9 October 24, 2017
REVISED BOND PROCEEDS EXPENDITURE AGREEMENT
This BOND PROCEEDS EXPENDITURE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered
into as of 2017, by and between the CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and the SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE GRAND TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate
and politic pursuant to Parts 1.8 and 1 .85 of Division 24 of the California Health & Safety
Code ("Successor Agency").
RECITALS
A. The City is a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State
of California.
B. The Successor Agency is a public body corporate and politic, organized and operating under
Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Dissolution Law (as defined in Recital D below).
C. The Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency ("former Agency")previously was a California
public body, corporate and politic, duly formed by the City Council of the City ("City
Council") and was organized, existed and exercised the powers of a community
redevelopment agency under. the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and
Safety Code Section 33000, et seq. ("CRL").
D. Assembly Bill xl 26 ("AB xl 26"), effective on June 28, 2011, added Parts 1 .8 and 1.85
to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code and which laws were modified,
in part, and determined constitutional by the California Supreme Court in the petition
California Redevelopment Association, et al. vs. Ana Matosantos, el al. Case No. S 194861
C'Matosantos Decision"), which laws and court opinion caused the dissolution of all
redevelopment agencies and winding down of the affairs of former redevelopment
agencies.Thereafter, such laws were amended further by Assembly Bill 1484 ("AB 1484")
that was effective on June 27, 2012, and thereafter further amended by subsequent
legislation (together AB xl 26, the Matosantos Decision, AB 1484, and subsequent
amending legislation are referred to as the "Dissolution Law"). All statutory references
herein are to the Dissolution Law unless otherwise stated.
E. As of February 1 ,2012, the former Agency became a dissolved community redevelopment
agency pursuant to the Dissolution Law.
F. As of and on and after February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency is performing its functions
as the successor agency under the Dissolution Law to administer the enforceable obligations
of the former Agency and is engaged in activities necessary and appropriate to wind down
the affairs of the former Agency, all subject to the review and approval by a seven-
member "Oversight Board" formed thereunder.
G. Section 34191.4(c)(1) of the Dissolution Law allows a successor agency that has received
a Finding of Completion to use bond proceeds from bonds issued prior to 2011 for the
purposes for. which the bonds were sold, provides that such proceeds in excess of amounts
2017-32 CC Reso Page 4 of 9 October 24, 2017
needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall be expended in a manner
consistent with the original bond covenants, and further provides that such expenditures
shall constitute "excess bond proceeds obligations" that shall be listed separately on the
successor agency's Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS").
H. The Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion from the State of California
Department of Finance (DOF) dated as of May 9, 2013.
I. The Successor Agency submitted its Last and Final ROPS.
J. The CRL pre-dissolution provided for, and the Dissolution Law post-dissolution
continues to provide for, a cooperative relationship between sponsoring cities and
their redevelopment agencies, as well as their successor agencies who have assumed the
duties and obligations of the former redevelopment agencies. Under CRL Section
33220, a city may aid and cooperate in the .planning, undertaking, construction, or
operation of redevelopment projects. CRL Section 33220(e) specifically authorizes a
city to enter into an agreement with its redevelopment agency or any other public entity
to further redevelopment purposes. Section 34178(a) of the Dissolution Law allows a
successor agency and its sponsoring city to enter into agreements, subject to Oversight
Board approval under Section 34180(h) of the Dissolution Law.
K. The Successor Agency has .and will have proceeds of its Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds (TABs) that are. not
otherwise obligated for a project or other enforceable obligation. The Successor
Agency desires to transfer such Excess Bond Proceeds (defined below) to the City
to enable the City to expend or allocate such Excess Bond. Proceeds for expenditures
consistent with all applicable covenants of the 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds.
L. The Successor Agency desires to transfer its Current Excess Bond Proceeds to the City to
enable the City to .use or allocate such Current Excess Bond Proceeds in a manner
consistent with the covenants of the 2011 Bonds and to undertake projects and programs
that were not previously funded and obligated by the former Agency pre-dissolution or
by the Successor Agency post-dissolution, or by the City pre- or post-dissolution. The
City Council and former Agency Board have found that the use of the Current Excess
Bond Proceeds to. fund various capital improvements within the Grand Terrace
Redevelopment Project Area complies with CRL Sections 33445, 33445.1, and 33679 and
other applicable law.
M. In order to facilitate the use of the Current Excess Bond Proceeds consistent with all
applicable bond covenants, the Successor Agency and the City have negotiated this
Agreement requiring the transfer of current excess bond proceeds of$2,026,585 by the
Successor Agency to the City, and the City's agreement to use such proceeds consistent with
all applicable covenants, conditions, restrictions and obligations under the 2011 Bonds.
With Oversight Board approval, the Successor Agency has listed the expenditure of the
Current Excess Bond Proceeds on its Last and Final ROPS; subject to approval of this
Agreement by the Oversight Board and DOF as an obligation to be funded with the
Current Excess Bond Proceeds.
2017-32 CC Reso Page 5 of 9 October 24, 2017
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. RECITALS
The .recitals above are an integral part of this Agreement and set forth the intentions of
the parties and the premises on which the parties have decided to enter into this
Agreement.
2. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the iridicated meaning:
2.1 "Dissolution Law" is defined in Recital D.
2.2 'Bond Proceeds" is defined in Recital J.
2.3 "Excess Bond Proceeds" means Bond Proceeds that are not needed to satisfy
Enforceable Obligations in the amount of$2,026,585 and is listed on the Last and
Final ROPS.
2.4 "Enforceable Obligations" mean enforceable obligations, other than Excess Bond
Proceeds obligations, as defined under the Dissolution Law.
3. SUCCESSOR AGENCY OBLIGATIONS
The Successor Agency shall have the following obligations under this Agreement:
3.1 Current Excess Bond Proceeds. The Successor Agency shall transfer to the
City, as soon as practicable and no later than June 30, 2017,the Current Excess
Bond Proceeds currently held by the Successor Agency totaling$2,026,585 as
shown in the Last and Final ROPS.
3.2 Projects Funded By Current Excess Bond Proceeds. The Successor Agency
assigns to the City all responsibilities in relation to the administration and
implementation of any projects or programs funded by the Current Excess Bond
Proceeds. The Successor Agency assigns to the City all contracts entered into
by the Successor Agency post-dissolution or the former Agency pre-dissolution
related to the expenditure of the Current Excess Bond Proceeds and any
activities to be funded by the Current Excess Bond Proceeds.
4. CITY OBLIGATIONS
The City shall have the following obligations under this Agreement:
4.1 Current Excess Bond Proceeds. The City shall accept, hold, disburse and administer
2017-32 CC Reso Page 6 of 9 October 24, 2017
the Current Excess Bond Proceeds of$2,026,585 transferred to the City by the Successor
Agency under this Agreement. The City shall retain any Current Excess Bond Proceeds
that it receives, without any obligation to return such funds to the Successor Agency, and
shall use or allocate such funds for uses consistent with applicable covenants of the 2011
Bonds.
The City may spend or allocate the Current Excess Bond Proceeds of$ 2,026,585 received.
or retained under this Agreement on any project,program, or activity authorized under the
2011 Indenture and the 2011 Tax Certificate. Notwithstanding.anything to the contrary
in this Agreement, the City shall spend or allocate the Current Excess Bond Proceeds
consistent with all covenants of the 2011 Bonds. The City shall be solely responsible for
ensuring that the Current Excess Bond Proceeds are maintained and spent (or allocated
to expenditures) in accordance with all covenants of the 2011 Bonds and other applicable
laws. The City may transfer funds between approved projects, programs and activities.
The City hereby assumes all contracts entered into or assumed by the Successor Agency
post dissolution or entered into by the former Agency pre-dissolution related to the
expenditure of Current Excess Bond Proceeds and any activities to be funded by Excess
Bond Proceeds, with the exception of those contracts relating to Enforceable Obligations,
which shall be retained by the Successor Agency. The City shall perform its obligations
hereunder, and under such assumed contracts, in accordance with the applicable provisions
of federal, state and local laws, including the obligation to comply with environmental
laws such as CEQA and/or NEPA, and shall timely complete the work required for each
project commenced by the City pursuant to this Agreement and the 2011 Indenture and
-� the 2011 Tax Certificate.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; WAIVERS; AND AMENDMENTS
5.1 This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties
with respect to -the transfer and use of Excess Bond Proceeds. This Agreement
integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto,
and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with
-respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
5.2 This Agreement is intended solely for the benefit of the City and the Successor
Agency. Notwithstanding any. reference in this Agreement to persons or entities
other than the City and the Successor Agency, there shall be no third party
beneficiaries under this Agreement.
5.3 All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement and all amendments to this
Agreement must be in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the
parties.
6. SEVERABILITY
' If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of
�- competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions
2017-32 CC Reso Page 7 of 9 October 24, 2017
shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the parties
have been materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability.
In addition, the parties shall cooperate in good faith in an effort to amend or modify this
Agreement in.a manner such that the purpose of any invalidated or voided provision,
covenant, or condition can be accomplished to the maximum extent legally permissible.
7. DEFAULT
If either party fails to adequately perform an obligation required by this Agreement
within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving written notice from the non-defaulting party,
the party failing to perform shall be in default hereunder. In the event of default, the
non-defaulting party will have all the ri ghts and remedies available to it at law or in equity
to enforce.the provisions of this contract, including without limitation the right to sue for
damages for breach of contract or to seek specific performance. The rights and remedies
of the non-defaulting party enumerated in this paragraph are cumulative and shall not
limit the non-defaulting party's rights under any other provision of this Agreement, or
otherwise waive or deny any right or remedy, at law or in equity, existing as of the
date 'of the Agreement or hereinafter enacted. or established,that may be available to the
non-defaulting party against the defaulting party.
8. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
This agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of all successors and
assigns of the parties, whether by agreement or operation of law.
9. NON-LIABILITY OF MEMBERS, OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES ANGE AGENTS;
NON-RECOURSE OBLIGATION
No member, officer, official, employee, agent or representative of the Successor Agency
or the City shall be personally liable for performance by the Successor Agency or City
hereunder, for breach or default by the City or Successor Agency hereunder, for any
amounts which may be payable or become due hereunder, or for any judgment or
execution thereon entered in any action.
10. FURTHER ASSURANCES
Each party agrees to execute, acknowledge and deliver all additional documents and
instruments, and to take such other actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out
the intent of this Agreement.
2017-32 CC Reso Page 8 of 9 October 24, 2017
In witness whereof, the undersigned parties have executed this Bond Proceeds Expenditure
Agreement as of the date first above written.
"CITY"
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
a California municipal corporation
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
"SUCCESSOR AGENCY"
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
GRAND TERRACE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
a public body corporate and politic
Successor Agency Chair
ATTEST:
Successor Agency Secretary
2017-32 CC Reso Page 9 of 9 October 24, 2017
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
-COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE )
I Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA,
DO HERBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2017-32 was
duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council, approved and signed by the
Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, at the regular meeting of said City Council held
on the 24th day of October 2017, and that the same was passed and adopted by the .
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Wilson, Hussey, Reinarz; Mayor Pro Tern
Robles; Mayor McNaboe
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Executed this 25th day of October 2017, at Grand Terrace, California.
Debra L. Thomas---
City Clerk
[SEAL]