The URL can be used to link to this page

12/14/2000 FILETOPY CITY - - �zHnD TERR CE .' December 14, 2000 22795 Barton Road'' . Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 Civic Center (909)824-6621 Fax(909)783-7629 ' Fax(909)783-2600 Y ` CITY OF GRAND; .TERRACE .. = Byron R.Matteson Mayor" - .. .. .•- CRA XITY COUNCIL Dan Buchanan Mayor.ProTem`.` - :REGULAR,MEETINGS - Herman Hilkey TH q Lee Ann Garcia 2ND •AND 4 T u1+SdCi yS.; 6.00 p.11l. Don Larkin Council Members'• - Thomas J.Schwab City.MBnager • -. .. Council Chambers Grand;Terrace' Civic Center: . .22795 Barton Road :... -Grand Terrace, CA'92313-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 14, 2000 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 7:30 P.M. 22195 Barton Road THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990.IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT(909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING, OTHER THAN UNDER PUBLIC COMMENT,YOU ARE ASKED TO PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED UPON BY THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. * Call to Order- * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance - * Roll Call - STAFF COUNCIL � AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 11-09-2000 Minutes Approve 2. Approval of Check Register CR0023&CR0024 Approve 3. 22237 Barton Road-Training Burn&Demolition Appropriate 4. Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for Quarter Accept Ended September 30,2000 5. Pico Street Property Lease'Agreement-Lucky Farms,Inc. Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation to Byron Matteson B. ECO Day 2000 Coloring Contest Winners 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff Member,or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register No.C0023 &C0024 Approve B. Ratify 12-14-2000 CRA Action C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda COUNCIL AGENDA 12-14-2000 PAGE 2 OF 3 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION D. Approval of 11-09-2000 Minutes Approve E. Resolution Adopting a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Adopt Program and Policy F. Resolution Adopting Standard Conflict of Interest Code Adopt G. Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for Accept Quarter Ended September 30,2000 H. Resolution Prohibiting Skateboarding,Bicycling and Approve Rollerskating in Designated Areas of the Azure Hills Church Areas and School Grounds I. Resolution Authorizing Nomination of an STP Project for Approve Improvement to the Intersection of Iowa Avenue at Main Street as a TEA-21,Surface Transportation Project 4. PUBLIC COMMENT 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Crime Prevention Committee a. Minutes of October 9,2000 Accept 2. Emergency Operations Committee a. Minutes of November 6,2000 Accept 3. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of October 30,2000&November 6,2000 Accept B. Council Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Adopt Terrace Amending Title 4,Chapter 4.88,of the Municipal Code and Revising the Schedule for Fees Related to the Planning Activities Provided by the City of Grand Terrace B. FY 2001-2002 CDBG Program:City Proposals 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the Adopt City of Grand Terrace Approving SP-92-01 Al (Specific Plan Amendment for American Tower)and E-99-07 (Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration) 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Adopt Terrace,California,Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November 7,2000,Declaring the Result and Such Other Matters as Provided by Law B. Swear-In New Council Members C. Election of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem D. Review and Assign Representatives/Alternates to Various Assign Government Organizations E. Set Date for Planning Commission Application Deadline to Fill Vacancy Created by the Election of Maryetta Ferre to the City Council and Schedule a Meeting to Conduct Interviews COUNCIL AGENDA 12-14-2000 PAGE 3 OF 3 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION 9. CLOSED SESSION-None ADJOURN THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,JANUARY 11,2001. --------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 01-11-2000 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 01-04-2000. PENDING C R A APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 9,2000 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on November 9, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Dan Buchanan, Vice-Chairman Herman Hilkey, Agency Member Lee Ann Garcia, Agency Member Don Larkin, Agency Member Tom Schwab,Executive Director Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Larry Ronnow,Interim Finance Director Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director Virgil Barham,Building & Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Rick Carr, Sheriff's Department i ABSENT: John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 26, 2000 MINUTES i i CRA-2000-72 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the October 26, 2000 Community, Redevelopment Agency Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER CR0022 CRA-2000-73 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN, CARRIED 5-0,to approve Check Register CR0022. Chairman Matteson adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:10 p.m. until the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday,December 14, 2000 at 7:30' p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CRA AGENDA PEEN!W. CITY OF G"D TERRACE PENDING C R A APPROVAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13487 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND OCTOBER 2000 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $199.35 13488 PATRICIA GROENEVELD BIRTHDAY BONUS $15.00 13490 CASH PURCHASE 22237 BARTON RD. $231,614.00 13491 HALCYON BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS 1/4 PG B&W ECON DEV. AD $1,127.05 13496 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY ADJUST EMPLOYEE LIFE INS. 7-00 THRU 11-00 $200.05 13503 CASH PURCHASE 22711 FAIRBURN $105,000.00 44555 DAN BUCHANAN AGENCY BOARD STIPEND $150.00 44557 C H J COMPACTION TESTING-VAN BUREN REHAB $111.00 44560 ROBERT CHAGOLLA CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS PMT#1-VAN BUREN REHAB $17,055.00 44566 DIEHL EVANS & COMPANY LLP 2000 REDEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK $75.00 44568 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM LAWN SERVICE LA PAIX & PALM REHABS $80.00 44569 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS RETAIL RECRUITMENT CONTRACT PAYMENT $5,997.84 44575 LEE ANN GARCIA AGENCY BOARD STIPEND $150.00 44576 GRAND TERRACE LITTLE LEAGUE _ LARKIN STIPEND DONATION $150.00 44579 HERMAN HILKEY AGENCY BOARD STIPEND $150.00 44586 BYRON MATTESON AGENCY BOARD STIPEND $150.00 44587 MICK HILL ENTERPRISES BLOCK WALL 22846 PALM REHAB $9,900.00 m 44588 SCOTT MORRISON &ASSOCIATES ASBESTOS INSPECTION 22237 BARTON REHAB $375.00 a 44592 PRECISION GRADING GRADING 22322 VAN BUREN REHAB $8,212.50 44594 R & L PAINTING PAINT GARAGE DRYWALL-LARK REHAB $500.00 I) 44602 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY INSTALL ELECTRICITY-VAN BUREN REHAB $148.74 z 44603 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CLOSING BILL-REED REHAB $1.91 a44604 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY CLOSING BILL-REED REHAB $29.26 44605 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY NATURAL GAS INSTALLATION-VAN BUREN REHAB $943.41 44612 VAVRINEK TRINE DAY& COMPANY ANNUAL AUDIT SERVICES $680.00 44614 WASTE MANAGEMENT PORTABLE SERVICES ROLLINS PARK PORTABLE TOILETS $443.34 Z 510367 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. MONTHLY LEASE PAYMENT $23,368.12 -GRAND-TOTAL _ --- $406,826.57 4 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0023 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED,CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY. / 1 z. LARRY RONNOW INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY OF GRAN"w ."ERRACE PENDING C R A APPROVAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ----------- CR0024 CHECK REGISTER NO: DATE: DECEMBER 1412000 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13505 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION DEADBOLT LOCK, SMALL TOOLS & OFFICE SUPPLIES 106.05 13509 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE MHN BENEFIT DECEMBER, 2000 65.01 13510 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND NOVEMBER, 2000 WORKERS COMPENSATION INS. 278.94 13511 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS., DECEMBER, 2000 1,045.51 13514 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE DISABILITY/LIFE INS. DECEMBER, 2000 38.71 44623 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.29 44624 BRICKLEY ENVIRONMENTAL 22237 BARTON RD-REMOVE ASBESTOS 1,085.00 44626 CANNERS BUSINESS INFORMATION DISPLAY AD-ECONbNIC DEVELOPMENT 1,407.-60 44628 ROBERT CHAGOLLA CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS PMT#2-22322 VAN BUREN-REHAB 23,895.00 44629 ROBERT CHAGOLLA CONSTRUCTION 12764 REED REHAB 5,468.00 44633 COMP USA PURCHASED LICENSED GRAPHIC PROGRAM 1,090.38 44634 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY COPIER MAINTENANCE 56.10 44637 DESIGN-SCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. ROLLINS PARK REHAB DESIGN WORK 1,596.00 44639 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS5,861.70 RETAIL RECRUITMENT PROGRAM 162.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 44650 KELLY PAPER 44653 MARIA LEONOR RODRIGUEZ BUILDING MAINTENA-NCE-BLDG & SAFETY 80.00 44655 MICK HILL ENTERPRISES BLOCK WALL 22846 PALM 4,050.00 44656 MIRACLE MILE CAR WASH CAR WASHES-CITY VEHICLES '6.00 44662 PRECISION GRADING 22322 VAN BUREN GRADING 912.50 44666 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. TAX INCREMENT ADMINISTRATION 317.50 44675 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CITY FACILITIES ELECTRICITY 81.26 44679 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER GASOLINE-CITY VEHICLES 106.09 44683 U.S. BANK TRUST N.A. TRUSTEE/AGENCY FEES 95441060 3,570.00 .44686 VERIZON WIRELESS 4 PHONES-OCT. 2000-BLDG & SAFETY 271.73 44692 YOSEMITE WATER WATER-CITY FACILITIES 18.80 GRAND TOTAL $51,596.80 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0024 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY. LARRY RONNOW f INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR 2 DATE: 12/6/00 W.O.# 12-10.2095 STAFF REPORT ::. ,%T y . GRAND TERR f CRA(X) COUNCIL ITEM( ) MEETING DATE: December 14,2000 �y SUBJECT: 22237 Barton Road-Training Burn and Demolition UGH K� FUNDING REQUIRED XX NO FUNDING REQUIRED Q DEPARTMENT OF iUILDING & SAFETY, PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING On October 12,2000, the Redevelopment Agency approved staff to enter into negotiation and counter offer the price and terms of the subject property. The counter offer of$230,OW0, which 22795 Barton Road was approved by the C.R.A., was accepted and the property has since closed escrow. Suite B Grand Terrace The existing structure had deteriorated to the point that it was a public nuisance and had to be California 92313-5295 demolished. Staff working with the San Bernardino County Fire Department created a training Civic Center exercise for the local fire agencies to afford vital fire fighting experiences under controlled (909) 825-3825 conditions. Any demolition requires an asbestos survey to be performed and it was determined Fax (909) 825-7506 that some asbestos was present. To comply with S.C.A.Q.M.D.,materials containing asbestos have been removed. Permits through S.C.A.Q.M.D. have been approved and the San Bernardino County Fire Department notified the property owners around the subject property. On December 9`'and 10',2000,the San Bernardino County Fire Department performed the l training exercise which culminated in the total burning of the existing structure. At this,point the Community Redevelopment Agency must notify S.C.A.Q.M.D. with another 10 day notice and remove the remaining debris,foundation and cap existing sewer lateral. The estimated cost for the clean up and disposal is$8,000 which will result in a clear parcel of land free of any structure i or debris. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Appropriate additional$400,000 for the Low-Moderate Housing Purchase Rehabilitation Program from available fund balance of$3,245,171. The original budget of$600,000 has been exceeded due to the purchase of this property and additional funds are necessary for ongoing expenses and .additional purchases,as well as for this request. 3 ;AUTHORIZE STAFF TO : 1. Notify the S.C.A.Q.M.D. 2. Contract for the removal,clean up and disposal of the remaining debris which would not exceed$8,000. /kc CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. CRA of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE `<> . <. ii`yy}.`•}C::>iitiv2ti::'i::i>.<y.>.}�v.vv.��.ti�x}}�iji:;?iii:+:::hiSi>.:~�::vie..•..•'•••::iv:±:v:::�{::`ti:�rti :y ': ;:;:::;{`:`jib:'.'.;v?:;�i::j:iii`:}iii'•isjt::k::i�•`.}}v't::2::ii<::i:<.'v::ii:;I;:;i:;:::j:{{:;::>:::<>:ii'ri'S,j;:::y:v'':i':+.'»:`iii: : `::•••v••.•}i:;::2}�:}.:ivt'}S{i$:r:i}ii{r�jL:?:;:::i<}?}:.,..,ti"i^^'ti i:S}}}:-i:ii: .........: € 17111 :2 n}„ GROHD TERR C CRA ITEM(X) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE : December 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: COMBINED CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 200 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The CRA and City are required to present quarterly investment reports to their governing boards in accordance with Government Code Section 53646 (b)(1)...(3) The report would include all moneys held by the Agency or City and all moneys held by third parties that belong to the Agency or City with the exception of any pension or deferred compensation moneys This code section requires that: 1)Report must be produced 30 days after end of quarter, 2) Report must comment on compliance with investment policy, 3)Report must comment if agency has ability to meet expenditures foi next six months. 4)Report must include a description of the investment, type of investment, issuer, investment pool or program information, date of maturity and amount invested, 5) Report must include book value and current market value of each investment. 6)Report must indicate source of the market valuation. CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. CRA of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Page 2 r The CRA and City have engaged the consulting division of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants (VTD), to assist the agencies in preparation of a combined investment report. The scope of their work will entail a review of the quarterly investment statements and bank statements, a compliance review with the investment policy and government code, obtaining market valuations and preparing the report. - The cost of the service is $6,000 which will be reimbursed 100% by SB 90, State Mandated Cost Reimbursement. Reimbursement funding for investment reporting was included at the last moment in the new State budget. Staff would like to continue with investment reporting assistance from VTD as long as the State continues funding reimbursement for this line item. Staff welcomes any questions or comments from the Agency Board. Staff Recommends that the Agency Board : Accept the Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000. CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF GRAND TERRA C E CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 C` T r 0 FROND TER R C CITY A.P 0 RE-DEVELOPMENT OF GRAND TERRACE CASH .'%ND INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT VRMAKDRR C FOR THE QEFZ10 ENDHD SEPTEN13ER 3 �, 2!�fjil $7,794,547 $1,591,391 $855,229 $5,451,633 ■Investment Pools ®Money Market Funds ❑Federal Agency Paper El Bank Accounts and Certificates of Deposits 1 I f:ITY .'`11IL-) REDEVELOPMENT OF GRAND T�RRACE ASH ND INVcSTMENTS TREASURY ,REPOT T i !,A M A -Y 1 ._ _. ...J'� CIND D. S_� IC1�1fJ=f �'v, �Ii�JJ - AVERAGE GENERAL PORTFOLIO BOOK VALUE MARKET VALUE MATURITY Investment Pools $ 6,647,966 $ 6;646,309 Federal Agency Paper 5,451,633 5,422,107 Money Market Funds 1,246,762 1,246,762 Bank Accounts &Certificates of Deposits 855,2291 855,229 j TOTAL GENERAL PORTFOLIO $ 14,201,590 $ 14,170,407 135 DAYS I FUNDS WITH FISCAL AGENTS BOOK VALUE MARKET VALUE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUNDS 1,436,304 1,436,304 _ i PAYMENT FUNDS 50,594 50,594 OTHER 4,3121 4,312 OTAL BOND PROCEEDS Is 1,491,210 $ 1,491,210 DAYS 1. 1 hereby certify that the investments are in compliance with the investment policy adopted by the City Council. 2. The City has the ability to meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months. 3. The market values for funds held in money market funds and banking institutions do not change. The amounts listed as market values for these items is the same as the book values. 4. The book value for LAIF Pool is the withdrawal value provided by the State Treasurer. 5. The market value of funds held by the State LAIF Pool equates to the City's pro-rata share of the market value of the entire LAIF investment pool. 6. The fiscal agent provided the market values for investments held in their accounts. 910.031T A 1Z'�` GRkI1D TEt2R t Larry Ronnow Interim Finance Director 2 CITY AND REDEVELOPMENT OF GRAND TERRACE CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURY 7"EP-OR T FUNDS IN INVESTMEN7 OR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEiNIBE 3CI, 10-00 Book Market Account Value Value Yield California Asset Management Program Cash Reserve Portfolio $ 318,590 $ 318,590 6.67% State Treasurer LAIF Pool City Account 1,240,846 1,240,521 6.47% State Treasurer LAIF Pool Redevelopment Account 5,088,530 5,087,198 6.47% Financial Investors Trust U.S.Treasury Money Market Fund 1,244,985 1,244,985 ML Stern U.S.Treasury Money Market Fund 1,777 1,777 5.66% $ 7,894,728 $ 7,893,071 Note 1: Market and book value for California Asset Management Program, Financial Investors Trust and ML Stern will stay the same since they are all bona fide money market funds. Note 2: Book value for the LAIF Pool is the contractual withdrawal amount. Market value share for LAIF equates to the City's pro-rata share of the market value of the entire State of California LAIF Pool. 3 E."!T ,`.:f l'atti,Y OF ('5 R A N 0 T E R,R,A C E ORT NJV 1 LT-7 `771- � U-r-A_ J i �. - .- 3 .1 A j I E 1N, T 11 1 J S T 7V I EE I",IT "R-s Book Market Stated Maturity Investment Value Value Rate Yield Date Federal Home Loan Bank Notes 1,096,414 $ 1,095,188 4.89% 6.28% 12/28/00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes 2,099,886 2,087,531 5.87% 5.87% 7/16/01 Federal Home Loan Bank Notes 2,255,333 2,239,388 5.27% 6.09% : 2/26/02 Total Individual Investments $ 5,451,633 $ 5,422,107 Note 1: Investments are managed by the California Asset Management Program and held in the City's name by Bank of New York Trust Department. 4 "IIVESTNI=M 'UR", 7, P 0 T 7:1 F Z-1 J Account Insured Collateralized Total Interest Maturity Institution Name Deposits Deposits Deposits Rate Date Bank of America General Account Checking Account $ 100,000 $ 252,069 $ 352,069 0.00% N/A Bank of America General Savings Savings Account $ 100,320 100,320 5.07% N/A Bank of America Redevelopment Agency Checking Account 99,973 99,973 0.00% N/A Bank of America Payroll Imprest Checking Account 3,108 3,108 0.00% California Federal Bank Redevelopment Agency Certificate ofDeposit 100,000 100,000 5.75% 8/6/01 Valley Bank Redevelopment Agency Certificate of Deposit 99,759 99,759 5.35% 11/27/00 Imperial Bank City of Grand Terrace Certificate of Deposit 100,000 100,000 6.20% 1/16/01 Total $ 399,759 455,470 855,229 5 P J1 D TE R A C E, R�- SUP JNIVESTNI CEENTS T CA Z'f F R H-P T 1, 7 Financing Book Market Stated Maturity Investment Issue Value Value Rate Yield Date First American Treasury Obligations Financing Authority Money Market Fund 1997 Refunding COPS $ 318.026 318,026 NA 5.90% 10/1/00 First American Treasury Obligations Redevelopment Agency Money Market Fund 1993 Refunding Bonds 26,603 26,603 NA 5.90% 10/1/00 State Treasurer Redevelopment Agency LAIF Pool 1993 Refunding Bonds 1,146,581 1,146,281 NA 6.470% 10/1/00 Total Funds with Fiscal Agent $ 1,491,210 1,490,910 Note 1: Book value for the LAIF Pool is the contractual withdrawal amount. Market value share for LAIF equates to the City's pro-rata share of the market value of the entire State of California LAW Pool. Adpr C11 I RAND TERR C Community Services Department Staff Report CRA ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: PICO ST. PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT- LUCKY FARMS, INC. NO FUNDING REQUIRED i BACKGROUND: In November, 2000, the Redevelopment Agency closed escrow on the purchase of approximately 45 acres of land on Pico St.. This acquisition was made between the RDA and Edison, which was required, as part of the de-regulation of the electrical industry, to dispose of excess property. The purchase of this land included approximately 5 acres of parkland at Pico Park and approximately 40 acres of property which will be made available for industrial development. DISCUSSION: ' I The land purchased had been previously used by Edison as a "buffer" property between the Highgrove Generating Station and adjacent residential areas in Grand Terrace. Functionally, the land has been farmed by Lucky Farms, Inc. of San Bernardino to raise a variety of crops for both domestic and export purposes. I Following the close of escrow, Staff has contacted Lucky Farms and began a negotiation to extend a previous,lease agreement to continue the farming operation until a final disposition and use of the land is made by the Redevelopment Agency. Under this agreement, Lucky Farms will pay the RDA an annual lease of$100 per acre or $4,144.00, whichever is greater. Additionally, they will pay the Agency a fee of$25 per acre foot of water which is removed from the well located on the property. Total annual income to the Agency as part of the agreement is estimated at $5,500.00. Staff is recommending approval of the lease agreement for a one (1) year period (which is renewable annually by either formal or letter agreement). RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors approve a Lease Agreement between the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace and Lucky Farms, Inc.; and 2. Authorize execution by the Mayor. CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. S I RAND TE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the day of 2000, between the COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, hereinafter called"Agency", and LUCKY FARMS, INC., hereinafter called "Lessee"; _ WITNESSETH: That Agency, for and in consideration of the faithful performance by Lessee of the terms, covenants, and agreements hereinafter set forth to be kept and performed by Lessee, does hereby give to Lessee the license to use that certain real property described below and depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof the ("Property") solely for the purpose hereinafter specified, upon and subject to the terms, reservations, covenants, and. conditions hereinafter set forth. The subject Property is located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. SUBJECT TO: Covenants, conditions,- restrictions, reservations, exceptions, rights, and easements, whether or not of record, including but not limited to the following: • Right of way for all irrigation and domestic water pipes and apparatus that may be required as reserved in Deeds from East Riverside Land Company to J.M. Rice recorded_March 16, 1892, in Book 147, page 377 of Deeds and recorded May 26, 1890, in Book 115, page 35 of Deeds. • Easement for pipeline for carrying domestic water over westerly thirty feet (30') of Lot 43 as granted by Deed from Riverside Orchards, Inc., and Merchants National Trust and Savings Bank to City of Riverside, recorded October 13, 1927, in Book 284, page 181 of Official Records. • Drainage easement from Southern California Edison Company to County of San Bernardino recorded February 9, 1976, in Book 8860, page 601 of Official Records. 1. Use: Lessee will use the Property for farming purposes only. Agency makes no representation, covenant, warranty, or promise that the Property is fit for any particular use, including the use for which this Agreement is made and Lessee is not relying on any such representation, covenant, warranty, or promise. Lessee's failure to make such use of the Property as determined by the Agency in its sole discretion, will be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article 2. 2. Termination: This Agreement is revocable immediately at the sole option and discretion of Agency and the Lessee agrees to peaceably surrender the premises upon written or oral demand by Agency or its authorized representative. Termination of this Agreement can be for a whole or part of the property as depicted in "Exhibit A". Agency reserves the right to terminate rights to individually segmented areas, and even portions of the individually segmented areas. Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Pagel Unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, this Agreement will be in effect for a term of one (1) year, commencing on January 1, 2001, and ending December 31, 2001. Lessee acknowledges that this Agreement does not entitle Lessee to any subsequent agreement, for any reason whatsoever, regardless of the use Lessee makes of the Property, the improvements Lessee places on or makes to the Property, or for any other. At the sole option of Agency, this Agreement can be renewed or extended for periods limited to one (1) year increments, by formal or letter agreement, subject to the terms of this Article and Article 38. 3. Fee: Lease Agreement shall be computed at a cost of either one hundred dollars ($100.00) per. acre or four thousand one hundred and forty-four dollars ($4,144.00), whichever is greater. 4. Lessee shall supply insurance and licensing as follows: Liability Insurance: Lessee will insure its liabilities, which may result from its activities hereunder by the purchase of a liability insurance policy with a combined single limit of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) and will include Agency as an additional insured. Lessee will provide Agency with evidence of such insurance upon request. Worker's Compensation: Shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the City, its employees or agents. = Lessee shall also provide the City with a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance and completed Declaration Regarding Licenses Status form. Lessee must also have a valid City of Grand Terrace Business License. Auto Insurance: Lessee shall provide Auto/Business Umbrella Liability Insurance as follows: I Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than (one) 1 million dollars per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Lessee owns no autos, a non- owned auto endorsement to the Liability policy described above is acceptable. 5. Agency's Use of the Property: Lessee agrees that Agency, its successors, and assigns, have the'fright to enter upon the Property, at any time, for any purpose, and the right to conduct any activity on the Property. Exercise of these rights by Agency, its successors, and assigns, will not result in compensation to Lessee for any damages whatsoever to personal property and/or crops located on the Property. 6. Lessee's Improvements: Lessee must submit, for Agency's prior written approval, complete improvement plans, including grading plans, identifying all existing and proposed improvements, prior to making any use of the Property. Lessee must submit, for Agency's prior written approval plans for any modifications to such improvements. Written approval may be modified and/or Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement Page2 I rescinded by Agency for any reason whatsoever. At any time, Lessee may be required to modify and/or remove any or all such previously approved improvements at Lessee's risk and expense and without any compensation from Agency. Agency is not required, at any time, to make any improvements, alterations, changes, or additions of any nature whatsoever to the Property. Lessee expressly acknowledges that any expenditures or improvements will in no way alter Agency's right to terminate in accordance with Article 2. 7. Lessee's Personal Property: All approved equipment and other property brought, placed, or erected on the Property by Lessee shall be and remain the Property of Lessee, except as otherwise set forth herein. If Lessee is not in default hereunder, Lessee shall have the right to remove the same from the Property at any time prior to thirty (30) days after the expiration or earlier - termination of this Agreement; provided, however, that Lessee shall promptly restore any damage to the Property caused by the removal. If Lessee is in default, however, Lessee shall not remove such equipment or other property without Agency's written consent until Lessee has cured such default, and Agency shall have a lien thereon to the extent thereof. 8. Height Limitations: Any equipment used by Lessee, its agents, employees, or contractors, on and/or adjacent to the Property, will be used and operated so as to maintain a minimum clearance of twenty-seven feet (27') feet from all overhead electrical conductors. Lessee will maintain all trees and plants on the Property at a maximum height of fifteen feet (15'). If requested by Agency, Lessee will remove any tree and/or other planting. 9. Access and Clearances: Lessee will provide Agency with adequate access to all of Agency's facilities on the Property and at no time will there be any interference with the free movement of Agency's equipment and materials over the Property. Agency may require Lessee to provide and maintain access roads within the Property, at a minimum of sixteen feet (16') in width, together with commercial driveway aprons and curb depressions capable of supporting a gross load of forty (40) tons on a three-axle vehicle. Unless otherwise specified in writing by Agency, Lessee will make no use of the area directly underneath Edison's towers and will maintain the following minimum clearances at all time: a. A fifty foot (50') radius around all tower legs b. A ten foot(10') radius around all steel and wood poles. 10. Parking: Lessee will not park, store, repair, or refuel any motor vehicles or allow parking, storage, repairing, or refueling of any motor vehicles on the Property unless specifically approved in writing by Agency. 11. Flammables,Waste, and Nuisances: Lessee will not, nor allow others to, place or store any flammable or waste materials on the Property or commit any waste or damage to the Property or allow any to be done. Lessee will keep the Property clean, free from weeds, rubbish, and debris; and in a condition satisfactory to Agency. Lessee will be responsible for the control of and will be liable for any damage or disturbance, caused by dust, odor, flammable or waste materials, noise, or other nuisance disturbances. Lessee will not permit dogs on the Property. 12. Pesticides and Herbicides: Any pesticide or herbicide applications and disposals will be made in accordance with all federal, state, county, and local laws. Lessee will dispose of all pesticides, herbicides, and any other toxic substances declared to be either a health or environmental hazard as well as all Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement, Page3 materials contaminated by such substances, including but not limited to, containers, clothing, and equipment in the manner prescribed by law. 13. Hazardous Waste: Lessee will not engage in, or permit any other party to engage in, any activity on the Property that violates federal, state, or local laws, rules, or regulations pertaining to hazardous, toxic, or infectious materials and/or waste. Lessee will indemnify and hold Agency, its directors, officers, agents, and employees, and its successors and assigns, harmless from any and all claims, loss, 'damage, actions, causes of action, expenses and/or liability arising from leaks of, spills of, and/or contamination by or from hazardous materials as defined by applicable laws or regulations, which may occur during and after the Agreement term, and are attributable to the actions of, or failure to act by, Lessee or any person claiming under Lessee. 14. Signs: Lessee must obtain written approval from Agency prior to the construction or placement of any sign, signboard or other form of outdoor advertising. I 15. Fencinq: Lessee may install fencing on the Property with prior written approval from Agency. Such fencing will include double drive gates,-a minimum of sixteen feet (16') in width, designed to accommodate Agency's locks, in locations specified by Agency. Lessee will ground and maintain all fencing. 16. Parkin and Landscaping: Lessee will keep p parkway and sidewalk areas i adjacent to the Property free of weeds and trash. Lessee will maintain parkways and provide landscaping that is compatible with adjoining properties and that is satisfactory to Agency. i 17. Irrigation Equipment: Any irrigation equipment located on the Property prior to the commencement of this Agreement, including but not limited to pipelines, well -- pumping equipment, and other structures, is the property of Agency and will remain on and be surrendered with the Property upon termination of this Agreement. Lessee will maintain, operate, repair, and replace, if necessary, all irrigation equipment at its own expense. 18. Underground Tanks: Lessee will not. install underground or aboveground storage tanks, as defined by any and all applicable laws or regulations, without Agency's prior written approval. 19. Underground Facilities: Any underground facilities installed or maintained by Lessee on the Property must have a minimum cover of three feet (3') from the top of the facility and be capable of withstanding a gross load of forty (40)tons on a three-axle vehicle. Lessee will compact any earth to a compaction of ninety percent (90%). Lessee will relocate its facilities at is own expense so as not to interfere with Agency's proposed facilities. 20. Utilities: Lessee will pay all charges and assessments for, or in connection with, water, electric current, or other utilities, which may be furnished to or used on the Property. 21. Taxes, Assessments, and Liens: Lessee will pay all taxes and assessments, which may be levied upon any crops, personal property, and improvements, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, and fixtures on the Property. Lessee will keep the Property free from all liens, including but not limited to, mechanics liens and encumbrances by reason of use or occupancy by Lessee, or any person claiming under Lessee. If Lessee fails to pay the above- Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency 'Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement Page4 mentioned taxes, assessments, or liens when due, Agency will have the right to pay the same and charge the amount to the Lessee. All accounts not paid within thirty (30) days of the agreed upon due date will be charged a "late fee" on all accounts outstanding up to the maximum rate allowed by law. 22. Expense: Lessee will perform and pay all obligations of Lessee under this Agreement. All matters or things herein required on the part of Lessee will be performed and paid for at the sole cost and expense of Lessee, without obligation on the part of Agency to make payment or incur cost or expense for any such matters or things. 23. Assignment: This Agreement is personal to Lessee, and Lessee will not assign, transfer, or sell this Agreement or any privilege hereunder in whole or in part, and any attempt to do so will be void and confer no right on any,third part. 24. Compliance with Law: Lessee will comply with all applicable federal, state, county, and local laws all covenants, conditions and restrictions of record and all applicable ordinances, zoning restrictions, rules, regulations, orders, and any requirements of any duly constituted public authorities now or hereafter in any manner affecting the Property or the streets and ways adjacent thereto. Lessee will obtain all permits and other governmental approvals required in connection with Lessee's activities hereunder. 25. Governing Law: The existence, validity, construction, .operation, and effect of this Agreement and all of its terms and provisions will be determined .in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 26. Indemnification: Lessee shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify Agency, its officers, agents, and employees, and its successors and assigns, from and against all claims, loss, damage, actions, causes. of actions, expense, and/or liability arising from or growing out of loss or damage to property, including that of Agency, or injury to or death of persons, including employees of Agency resulting in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, by reason of this Agreement or the use or occupancy of the Property by Lessee or any person claiming under Lessee. 27. Events of Default: The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a material default and breach of this Agreement by Lessee: . a) Any failure by Lessee to pay the fee due in accordance with Article 3, or to make any other payment required to be made by Lessee hereunder when due. b) The abandonment or vacating of the Property by Lessee. c) Any attempted assignment or subletting of this Agreement by Lessee in violation of Article 23. d) The violation by Lessee of any resolution, ordinance, statute, code, regulation, or other rule of any governmental agency in connection with Lessee's activities pursuant to this Agreement. e) A failure by Lessee to observe and perform any other provision of this Agreement .to be observed or performed by Lessee, where such failure continues for the time period specified in a written notice thereof by Agency to Lessee. Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property—Lease Agreement Page5 f) Any attempt to exclude Agency from the licensed premises. g) The making by Lessee of any general assignment for the benefit of creditors; the appointment of a receiver to take possession of substantially all of Lessee's assets located on the Property or of Lessee's privileges hereunder where possession is not restored to Lessee within five (5) days; the attachment, execution, or other judicial seizure of substantially all of Lessee's assets located on the Property or of Lessee's privileges hereunder, where such seizure is not discharged within five (5) days. h) Any case, proceeding or other action brought against Lessee seeking any of the relief mentioned in "clause g" of this Article which has not be stayed or dismissed within thirty (30)days after the commencement thereof. 28. Remedies: In the event of any default by Lessee, then in addition to any other remedies available to Agency at law or in equity, Agency shall have the immediate option to terminate this Agreement and all rights of Lessee hereunder by giving written notice of termination to Lessee. Upon termination, Agency will have the right to remove Lessee's personal property from the Property, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, and fixtures. In addition, Agency may immediately recover from Lessee all amounts due and owing hereunder, plus interest at the maximum rate permitted by law on such amounts until paid, as well as any other amount necessary to compensate Agency for all the detriment proximately caused by Lessee's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. 29. Non-Possessory Interest: Agency retains full possession of the Property and Lessee will not acquire any interest temporary, permanent, irrevocable, possessory, or otherwise by reason of this Agreement, or by the exercise of the "! permission given herein. Lessee will make no claim to any such interest. Any violation of this provision will immediately void and terminate this Agreement. 30. Waiver: No waiver by Agency of any provision hereof shall be deemed a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by Lessee of the same or any other provision. Agency's consent to or approval of any act shall not be deemed to render unnecessary the obtaining of Agency's consent to or approval of any subsequent act by Lessee. 31. Authority: This Agreement is pursuant to the authority of an upon, and is subject to the conditions prescribed by General Order No. 69-C of the public Utilities Commission of the State of California dated and effective July 10, 1985, which General Order No. 69-C, by this reference, is hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 32. Attorney's Fees: In the event of any action, suit, or proceeding against the other, related to this Agreement, or any of the matters contained herein, the successful party in such action, suit, or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable attorney fees incurred. 33. Electric and Magnetic Fields: In recent years there have been numerous scientific studies about the effects of power frequency (60 Hz) EMF. There are several sources of EMF, including household appliances and electric power facilities. Scientists do not agree on how to interpret the currently available information. There is agreement, however, that this is an important issue that should be resolved. Edison would like to share with the Lessee the balanced Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Page6 information or literature Edison has about EMF, if said prospective Lessee is interested. Should Lessee wish, brochures will be made available, upon request, that explain some facts about EMF and that outline Edison's policy in this area. Lessee agrees to advise Edison if they have any questions or require additional information. 34. Notices: All notices required to be given by either party will be made in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To Agency: City of Grand Terrace Attn: Assistant City Manager 22795 Barton Road. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 To Lessee: Lucky Farms, Inc. P.O. Box 985 Loma Linda, CA 92354 Business Telephone No. (909) 799-6688 Lessee will immediately notify Agency of any address change. 35. Recording: Lessee will not record this Agreement. 36. Restrictions: a) Lessee agrees that any equipment used on the subject property shall be used so as to maintain a minimum clearance of twenty-five feet (25') from all Edison structures and a minimum clearance of twenty-five feet (25') from all overhead electrical conductors located on said property. b) Lessee shall provide Edison with adequate access to all of Edison's facilities and at no time is there to be any interference with the free movement of Edison's equipment and materials. c) Lessee will not park, repair, or refuel, or permit to be parked, repaired, or refueled, any vehicles or mechanized equipment within the assigned area. Lessee further agrees not to park or store any motor vehicles nor to allow the parking or storage of any motor vehicles directly underneath or within ten feet(10') of the drip line of any overhead electrical conductors. d) Lessee agrees to lock or close any fences or gates at end of workday and during nonuse of the property. e) Upon termination.. of this Agreement, the Lessee agrees to restore the premises to a condition as close as possible to that when they entered upon said property. Lessee will peaceable quit, surrender, and prior to termination date or completion of sale, restore the property to a condition satisfactory to the Agency. f) No buildings, structures, or accumulation of flammable or combustible materials or explosives shall be permitted on said property. Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Pagel g) Lessee shall not engage in, or permit any other party to engage in, any activity on the Property that violates any federal, state, or local laws, rules or regulations pertaining to hazardous, toxic, or infectious materials and/or waste ("Hazardous Materials"). Lessee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to disclosure of Hazardous Materials. 'Lessee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, or local laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the storage and/or discharge of Hazardous Materials. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Agency, its directors, officers, agents, and employees and its successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, loss, damage, actions, causes of actions, expenses and/or liability arising from leaks of, spills of, release of, and/or contamination by or from Hazardous Materials as defined by applicable laws, rules, or regulations, which arise during or after the Agreement term, and are attributable to the actions of, or failure to act by, Lessee or any person claiming under Lessee. i h) In recent years there have been numerous scientific studies about the effects of power frequency (60 Hz) EMF. There are several sources of EMF, including household appliances and electric power facilities. Scientists do not agree on how to interpret the currently available E information.. There is agreement, however, that this is an important issue that should be resolved. Edison would like to share with the Lessee the balanced information or literature Edison has about EMF, if said Lessee is interested. Should Lessee wish, brochures will be made available, upon request, that,explain some facts about EMF and that outline Edison's policy in this area. Lessee agrees to advise Edison if they have any questions or require additional information. i) Lessee, their contractors, and employees must have in their possession at all times a copy of this Agreement while on the premises. 37. Warranty: It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessee takes the premises as is, and that Agency makes no representation, covenant, warranty, or promise that the said premises are fit for any particular use which Agreement was entered into and Lessee has not relied on any such representation, covenant, warranty, or promise. 38. Special Conditions: f • Lessee and Agency agree that 120 (written or oral) notification is considered reasonable notification. Once notified, Lucky farms, Inc. will cease planting crops. If planting is commenced requiring harvest after 120 days from date of notification, it will be at Lessee's own risk and expense. Agency will not be liable for any loss or damage to crops. • Lessee will execute the attached Water Addendum Agreement should Lessee wish to extract and use the water from Edison Highgrove Well#6803 Plant L-5. 39. Complete Agreement: Agency and Lessee acknowledge that the foregoing provisions and any addendum's and exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS agreement to be executed in duplicate as of the day and year herein first above written. Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Page8 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE BY AGENCY LUCKY FARMS, INC. BY BY LEASEE Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Page9 ADDENDUM FARM USE A. Lessee must obtain prior written approval from Agency for the installation of any facilities; including any subsequent modifications. Lessee will maintain all facilities in a safe condition satisfactory to Agency. B. At any time, Agency may require the relocation of any portion of the facilities. Lessee will relocate same, at its expense to a location satisfactory to Agency within sixty (60) days after receiving notice to relocate from Agency. C. At Lessee's expense, Lessee will post signs at all access points to the Property that read: "No Kite Flying, Model Airplanes, or Balloons Permitted, High Voltage Wires Overhead." D. At Lessee's expense, Lessee will post signs at all access points to the Property that read: "No Motorcycles, Motorbikes, Horseback Riding, or Hunting Permitted." E. Lessee must close the park at any time Agency deems it necessary for the safety of the general public. If it is necessary to close the Farm for a period of more than three (3) days, Lessee will notify the general public of the closure by posting signs at all access points to the Property. F. At Lessee's expense, Lessee will install removable post-type barriers designed to accommodate Agency's locks, to prevent unauthorized vehicular use or parking, including but not limited to, motorcycles, off-road vehicles, and all-terrain vehicles. G. At Lessee's expense, Lessee,will provide fencing or trespass discouragers on Agency's towers. H. Lessee must design and construct all walkways, underground sprinkler service systems, lighting facilities, and drains to be capable of withstanding a gross load of forty (40) tons on a three-axle vehicle. Lessee's Initials Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Page10 WATER ADDENDUM Addendum to License Agreement dated between the City of Grand Terrace, hereinafter called "City" and Lucky Farms, Inc., hereinafter called "Licensee", for Agriculture (farming); AND Restoration and Vacation of property purposes. A. The rights granted under this Addendum shall terminate immediately upon the expiration, cancellation, or termination of the Agreement. B. Licensee may exercise the right to pump from City Well (formerly Edison Highgrove Well #6803 Plant L-5) hereinafter called "well", and shall put the extracted water to a reasonable and beneficial use. Licensee shall not, by the exercise of the right to pump, acquire any right to extract water independent of the right of the City. C. Licensee shall pay to the City a water allocation fee in the sum of twenty.-five dollars ($25.00) per acre-foot of water pumped from XXXXXX to XXXXX. The City will read the water meter and bill Licensee each month. Licensee shall be billed monthly and payment shall be mailed to the address provided with the bill. D. Licensee shall pay any assessments, taxes, or fees levied against the City or Licensee due to the Licensee's pumping and/or extraction of water. E. Licensee shall bear the expense of and be responsible for all maintenance and repair of well. F. The City makes no representation, covenant, warranty, or promise that water from the well is fit for any particular use, including the use for which Agreement is granted and Licensee is not relying on ay such representation, covenant, warranty, or promise. G. Licensee shall notify the City of any and all pumping and water extraction done pursuant to this Agreement. H. Licensee shall state, in any recording of water production for the period of this Agreement, that pumping and/or extraction was done pursuant to this Agreement. I. Licensee shall at its own cost, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, successors in interest, from and against any'and all liability, damages, loses, assessments, fees, claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including attorney fees, resulting from Licensee's acts or omissions while exercising its rights and obligations pursuant to the Agreement. J. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement from one party to another shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been delivered to that party for all purpose, if personally served or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid to the persons and addresses below: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LUCKY FARMS, INC. Assistant City Manager 1194 Brier Avenue 22795 Barton Road San Bernardino, CA 92408 Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property-Lease Agreement- Pagell DATED: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LUCKY FARMS, INC. "CITY" "LICENSEE" By: By: Title: Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Pico Street Property- Lease Agreement- Page92 AREA 1 1 `FAROEL ` ` ' � w. •.'' k'�w` - - - ci IN �I . (._ w •� �', •� _ `�� 5`— - BCE BALL AREA 2 _ FIELD - _ AREA 3 gr Approftata Seale 100 200 300 1 Inch — awfwt EA I "�'{ w •,. LEGEND q 'As APPROXIMATE LOCA71 O N OF DEEP WATER WELL SITE LOCAMN SITE PLAN RAM) R; ` PICO STREET FARM PROPERTY GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF GR,-.. D TERRACE COfUiNCIL k .. L -OVAL DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 _ CHECK REGISTER NO: _ C0023 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: NOVEMBER-23, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13486 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS FOR PAYROLL ENDING 10/27/00 $3,653.04 13487 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND OCT. 2000 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1,505.48 13488 PATRICIA GROENEVELD BIRTHDAY BONUS $35.00 13489 SHIELA CISNEROS BIRTHDAY BONUS $50.00 13492 JOHN DONLEVY REIMBURSE HALLOWEEN HAUNT COSTS $497.19 13493 HOME DEPOT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $291.56 13494 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ADMIN. OFFICE CITY/COUNTY CONFERENCE-ARROWHEAD $422.00 13495 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING/LUNCH 11/16 ARROWHEAD $80.00 13496 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE LIFE INS.-ADJUST. 7-00 THRU 11-00 $2,014.25 13497 RICHARD ROLLINS OCT. 2000 OPEN/CLOSE/CLEAN PARKS $689.00 13499 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INCORPORATED COLLECTIONS SERVICE $497.50 13500 RICHARD ROLLINS ADJUST OPEN/CLOSE/CLEAN PARKS 10-00 $260.00 13504 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS FOR PAYROLL ENDING 11/10/00 $3,692.62 44551 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO. INC. REPAIR PARTS $52.48 44552 ADDINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SERVICES $2,320.00 O 44553' AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTEMS POSTAGE SCALE SOFTWARE UPGRADE $184.25 44554 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES $330.99 Z 44555 DAN BUCHANAN CITY COUNCIL STIPEND $250.00 0 44556 BUREAU FOR AT-RISK YOUTH RED RIBBON WEEK SUPPLIES $166.86 1" 44558 CA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGNAL MAINTENANCE& ENERGY $34.92 44559 CENTRAL CITY SIGN SERVICE 6 TELSPAR SIGN POSTS $139.00 m 44561 CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA MEMBERSHIP DUES 2000-2001 $110.00 z 44562 CITY NEWSPAPER GROUP LEGAL ADS $253.00 a 44563 COLTON JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 YR LEASE OF COMMUNITY CENTER $101.00 44564 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $142.48 44565 COMPUMASTER MICROSOFT OFFICE TRAINING $69.00 44567 JOHN DONLEVY REIMBURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES $43.37 z 44568 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM ORIOLE/FRANKLIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE $125.00 44570 ELROD FENCE COMPANY CORE DRILLING MICHIGAN/VAN BUREN $385.00 1 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0023 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 44571 EVERGREEN GOPHER CONTROL-CITY PARKS $150.00 44572 EXPANETS TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE $304.70 44573 FED-EX DOCUMENT DELIVERY $49.56 44574 GRAND TERRACE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NOVEMBER NEWSLETTER SHARE $467.00 44575 LEE ANN GARCIA CITY COUNCIL STIPEND $250.00 44577 HARPER& BURNS LLPN OCT. 2000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $1,180.00 44578 HENAGON LTD COLTON TOPSOIL $10.24 44579 HERMAN HILKEY CITY COUNCIL STIPEND $250.00 44580 HOME DEPOT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $130.55 44581 HOUSTON & HARRIS SEWER MAINTENANCE & HYDROWASH $5,400.60 44582 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION BREAD PRODUCTS-CHILD CARE $85.47 44583 JANI-KING JANITORIAL SERVICE-CHILD CARE $759.00 44584 DON LARKIN CITY COUNCIL STIPEND $250.00 44585 LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP BRAVE NEW WORLD SEMINAR-DONLEVY $199.00 44586 BYRON MATTESON CITY COUNCIL STIPEND $250.00 44589 NOBEL SYSTEMS SEWER MAPPING PROJECT $6,913.50 44590 PACIFIC BELL CITY PHONE LINES $83.28 44591 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT-CHILD CARE $414.62 44593 PRIME EQUIPMENT FORKLIFT RENTAL $298.48 44595 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY OUTSOURCE SEWER BILLING $1,287.38 44596 LARRY RONNOW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10-30-00 THRU 11-11-00 $3,132.00 44597 S.B. COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 1982-91 SIGNAL LIGHTING EXPENSE & NPDES FEE $4,570.65 44598 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF NOVEMBER 2000 SERVICE CONTRACT $83,265.00 44599 S.B. COUNTY WASTE SYSTEMS DIVISION ACCT#842 DUMP CHARGES $703.28 44600 S.B. COUNTY FIRE DEPT./HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 3RD QTR HOUSEHOLD HAZ WASTE $2,772.25 44601 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. SEPT/OCT 2000 SIGNAL MAINT/REPAIR $727.04 44603 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY-CITY FACILITIES $3,553.28 44604 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY NATURAL GAS-CITY FACILITIES $264.36 44606 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 9/1/00-11/30/00 LEASE OF PICO PARK $125.00 44607 SYSCO FOOD/SUPPLIES-CHILD CARE $1,114.77 CITY OF GRrwq''D TERRACE DATE: N0VEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0023 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: NOVEMBER 23, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 44608 TOM & KATHY'S ANY HOUR LOCK & KEY KEYS MADE & STAMPED $139.80 44609 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING BRENTWOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS $394.60 44610 TRASHCOLLECTION.COM GRAND TERRACE ECO-DAY EXPENSES $3,844.02 44611 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT DIG ALERT FAX NOTIFICATION SERVICE $81.25 44613 VISIBLE 1099 FORMS $84.10 44615 WAXIE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CHILD CARE $374.45 44616 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS PEST CONTROL-CITY FACILITIES $155.00 44617 XEROX CORPORATION MAINTENANCE & STAPLES $299.04 44618 YOSEMITE WATER WATER-CITY FACILITIES $87.00 SUBTOTAL $142,815.26 OCTOBER PAYROLL $113,949.66 GRAND TOTAL $256,764.92 I CERTIFY THAT, TO.THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. LARRY RONNOW INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR 3 . ..it CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CCOUNCIL AP-'-, DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0024 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13498 DRAGOS BARBU BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00 13505 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VOLUNTEER PICNIC, PAYROLL TRAINING &VACUUM EXPENSES 1,443.34 13506 PACIFIC BELL CITY FACILITY PHONE LINES 71.12 13507 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 11/16 MTG. FERRE & MARTINEZ-LAKE ARROWHEAD 40.00 13508 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS FOR PAYROLL ENDING.11/24/00 3,826.53 13509 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK MHN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT DECEMBER, 2000 490.65 13510 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND NOVEMBER, 2000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,161.55 13511 PACIFICARE EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS. DECEMBER, 2000 9,690.06 13512 INLAND COUNTIES INSURANCE SERVICES EMPLOYEE DENTAL&VISION DECEMBER, 2000 998.92 13513 METLIFE EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE DECEMBER, 2000 535.98 13514 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE DISABILITY& LIFE INS. DECEMBER, 2000 1,260.19 44622 AT &T HONEYWELL LINE PHONE SERVICE 14.69 44623 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 308.29 44625 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS RISOGRAPH 2O01 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 479.96 44627 CENTRAL CITY SIGN SERVICE TRAFFIC SIGNS & HARDWARE 584.34 44630 CITY NEWSPAPER GROUP LEGAL ADS FOR FUTURE PUBLIC HEARINGS 66.00 44631 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS 2000 GASB 34 CAFR 20.00 44632 CITY OF COLTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT 138,526.10 44634 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY COPIER 45.90 44635 DATA PRINT GIS PROJECT SUPPLIES 798.76 44636 DATA TICKET INC. PROCESS PARKING CITATIONS 100.00 44638 DICKSON COMPANY STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 2,083.33 44640 MARYETTA FERRE' PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 44641 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY WEED CONTROL, FERTILIZER 9.70 44642 G.T. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEMBERSHIP-TANYA CAHILL 25.00 44643 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 2001 ANNUAL RENEWAL-RONNOW 150.00 44644 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORM COMPANY MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS 108.61 44645 H.R. DIRECT 2001 ABSENTEE CALENDARS 68.93 44646 HOME DEPOT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 326.02 1 CITY OF GRAND 1;�.<RACE _DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: 0 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 44647 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 20.68 44648 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION BREAD PRODUCTS-CHILD CARE 75.17 44649 JANI-KING OF COLTON JANITORIAL SERVICE-CHILD CARE 759.00 44651 HEIDI KNIPE LAIRD HOLIDAY STRESS WORKSHOP 11/16-CHILD CARE 30.00 44652 LEGEND BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIBRARY JANITORIAL SERVICE 200.00 44654' MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CITY FACILITIES LOCAULONG DISTANCE EXPENSE 657.52 44656 MIRACLE MILE CAR WASH CAR WASHES-CITY VEHICLES 22.00 44657 MUS LAWN SERVICE TERRACE PINES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 400.00 44658 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY MONTHLY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 242.55 44659 PACIFIC BELL CITY HALL PHONE LINE EXPENSE 238.78 44660 POST TOOLS INC. SMALL TOOLS 10.75 44661 DENNICE PRECIE CONFERENCE MILEAGE-ANAHEIM 9/23/00 31.05 44663 PRESS ENTERPRISE ANNUAL RENEWAL ROUTE#26-142 131.55 44664 ROADRUNNER STORAGE NOV. & DEC. 2000 STORAGE FEE 126.00 44665 RICHARD ROLLINS NOV. 2000 OPEN/CLOSE/CLEAN PARKS 806.00 44667 ROSIE MACIAS CONFERENCE MILEAGE-ANAHEIM 9/23 18.66 44668 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER BOOKING FEES 159.72 44669 S.B. COUNTY AUDITOR/CONTROLLER FY 00-01 CAL-ID CONTRIBUTION 10,050.00 44670 S.B. COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL MAPS 3.00 44671 S.B. COUNTY SHERIFF 1ST QTR SHERIFF OVERTIME, POP OVERTIME 13,502.01 44672 S.B. COUNTY VEHICLE SERVICES SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT 37.98 44673 SANTA CLAUS INC. CITIZEN PATROL DONATION 500.00 44674 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. NOV. SIGNAL MAINT/REPAIRS & SURVEY 723.52 44675 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CITY FACILITIES/SIGNALS/STREET LIGHTS ELECTRICITY 4,170.41 44676 SOFTERWARE INC. CHILD CARE SOFTWARE &TRAINING 1,852.00 44677 STANDARD CHAIR OF GARDNER OFFICE CHAIR 361.00 44678 SYSCO FOOD/SUPPLIES-CHILD CARE 1,496.86 44679 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER GASOLINE-CITY VEHICLES 876.11 44680 TOM &KATHY'S ANY HOUR LOCK& KEY 7 KEYS &WRIST HOLDERS 24.24 44681 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC. 6-VOLT BATTERIES& RIVETS FOR SIGN 44.18 2 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0024 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: DECEMBER 14, 2000 CHECK# VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 44682 MARY TRAINOR PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 44684 FRAN VAN GELDER PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 44685 VAVRINEK TRINE DAY& COMPANY SB90 10% CONTINGENT FEE & STATE CONTROLLERS REPORT 890.00 44686 VERIZON WIRELESS OCT/NOV. CELL PHONE BILL-CHILD CARE 38.43 44687 WAXIE JANITORIAUMAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1,228.38 44688 WEST GROUP CA CODE UPDATES 109.91 44689 WILLDAN HARRIS TRANSFER&VICTORIA HOMES PLAN REVIEWS 916.99 44690 DOUG WILSON PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 44691 XEROX CORPORATION MAINTENANCE-XEROX 184.10 44692 YOSEMITE WATER WATER FOR CITY FACILITIES 166.45 SUBTOTAL $205,588.97 NOVEMBER PAYROLL (3 PAYROLLS) $164,004.40 GRAND TOTAL $369,593.37 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. LARRY RONNOW INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR 3 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING r771 COUNCIL APPnOVAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING- NOVEMBER 9, 2000 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on November 9, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Dan Buchanan,Mayor Pro Tern ✓ Herman Hilkey, Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember Don Larkin, Councilmember Tom Schwab,.City Manager _Brenda.Stanfill, City Clerk Larry Ronnow, Interim Finance Director Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director Virgil Barham, Building&Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Rick Carr, Sheriff's Department, i ABSENT: John Donlevy, Assistant.City Manager The meeting was opened with invocation by Councilman Don Larkin, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tern Dan Buchanan. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. Eco Day Presentation Steve Berry,trashcollection.com,gave a presentation on the Eco Day 2000 that was held on October 7,2000. He thanked all of the sponsors of the event. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2000-165 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY , COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following consent calendar items with the removal of item 3F: 3A. Approval of Check Register No. C0022 3B. Ratify 11-09-00 CRA Action 3C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3D. Approval of 10-26-00 Minutes 3E. Transit Shelter Agreement with Omnitrans 3G. Community Center Sub-Lease with Grand Terrace Lions Club COUNCIL AGENDA 17M.Na M Council Minutes November 9,2000 Page 2 ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3F. Resolution Authorizing for Filing and Executing Application for Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Councilmember Larkin, questioned whether staff has spoken to the residents and businesses along Michigan. Community and Economic Development Director Materassi,responded that at this point they have not. They do an environmental review according to the schedule of the application and that is when they will have an opportunity to talk to the residents. If the City receives the grant then staff will talk to the residents again. Councilmember Larkin, questioned if the City will lose money if we begin the process and then decide not to do the project. Community and Economic Development Director Materassi,indicated that the City will not loose any money. CC-2000-166 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN,CARRIED 5-0,to approve a Resolution of the City of Grand Terrace Authorizing Nomination of Michigan Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements for Funding as a Transportation Enhancement Activity and/or a Transportation Development Act Article 3 Project. PUBLIC COMMENT -None ORAL REPORTS '5A. Committee Reports 1. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee a. Minutes of October 2, 2000 CC'2000-167 MOTION BY COUNC]LMEMBER GARCIA,SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the October 2, 2000 Minutes of the Historical and Cultural Activities`Committee. 5B. Council Reports Mayor Matteson,congratulated the Council Members who were reelected and also Maryetta Ferre',Council-Elect. He reported that the City Birthday will be held on December 14,2000 and invited everyone to come and join in the celebration. He also reported that the Country Council Minutes November 9,2000 Page 3 Fair was held on November 4, 2000 and that it was well attended and that Councilmember Herman Hilkey and Councilmember Lee Ann Garcia placed in the cooking contest. Mayor Pro Tem Buchanan,extended his congratulations to Lee Ann Garcia,Don Larkin and Maryetta Ferre' on their election and that he is looking forward to working with them over the next two years. He reported that he enjoyed the Country Fair and that he was one of the Judges representing the City Council. He commended the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee on another Fair done well. Councilmember Larkin,thanked the voters of Grand Terrace for their trust and confidences ; and promised to do the best job that he can over the next four years. He thanked his supporters and his family. He feels that Council needs to be proactive with the communications with the residents and businesses in the Community. We need to do as much as we possibly can to help our local businesses and those wanting to relocate to our City. He thanked Byron. Councilmember Garcia, reported that the last few months has been a very humbling experience for her. She got to meet many wonderful people in the community. She encouraged the members of the community to come and show their support for Byron Matteson at the December 14, 2000 Council Meeting, which.will be his last meeting. - Councilmember Hilkey,congratulated Don Larkin,Lee Ann Garcia and Maryetta Ferre'. He thanked the Woman's Club for the outstanding job.that they did on the Halloween Haunt. PUBLIC HEARING 6A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Approving SP-92-01 Al (Specific Plan ,Amendment for American Tower) and E-99-07 (Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration) John Lampe,Planner,gave a brief report on the background on the proposed Ordinance. He indicated that staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the first reading of the Ordinance approving SP-92-01 Al and Approving E-99-07, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, in that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. Mayor Matteson,questioned why there was no requirement for the tower to be camouflaged. Mr. Lampe, responded that the distance between where the tower will be located and the developed portions of the City is such that the view of the site of the tower itself will be very minimal and portions of the mountain will act as a screen and that additional conditions are being imposed that the tower be painted with non-reflective type paint matching sky colors. Councilmember Larkin,questioned if there was an anticipation of more towers being built. Council Minutes November 9,2000 Page 4 Mr. Lampe, responded that there is approval of a specific plan which will allow for two additional towers to be built immediately north of the site,which was approved in 1996. He indicated that on the American Tower site there is a stipulation that no new towers can be built within 800 feet which will preclude any new towers being built beyond the current proposal. Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public. Representative from American Tower Corporation,requested the support of the Council on the proposed ordinance. Jeff McHaddad, requested support of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Matteson,questioned whether or not American Tower can show proof of prescriptive rights. Jeff McHaddad,responded that they are working with the adjacent property owners and that as part of the CUP they will have to show proof. Dr. Si dg estad, indicated that he supports the proposed Ordinance if they can come up with an easement that he feels is satisfactory with regards to the American Tower Project. Jim Sullivan,indicated that there has not been legal access to the properties. There has been a written agreement between the two adjoining property owners in order to avoid any prescriptive rights. They have agreed that there will not be any pursuit of prescriptive rights and everyone is happier that way. He indicated that he supports the project with the inclusion of one condition by staff. He requested that there be a specific condition that there be an easement from Dr. Sigdestad specifically for this project. John Harper, City Attorney reminded the Council that the only item that they are voting on is to approve an Ordinance amending the development standards of a specific plan not a particular project. The specifics and requirements of a project are done through a CUP and are not included in the proposed ordinance. a Mayor Matteson returned discussion to the Council.. CC-2000-168 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO � TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the first reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Approving SP-92-01 Al (Specific Plan Amendment for American Tower) and E-99-07 (Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration) UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None C1Ty . WROMDTIERME Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM: ADOPTION AND GOALS NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND: Under Federal Guidelines, all entities, both State and Local, which receive Federal funding for transportation related projects, are.now required to begin the implementation of programs which will assist and maximize the use of Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE's). Because the City of Grand Terrace utilizes Federal funding (Barton Rd. RR Overcrossing Retrofit), it is required to adopt programs and implement the processes outlined and required under these regulations. DISCUSSION: Under Title 49 CFR Part 26, the US Department of Transportation now mandates "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises" in all projects which involve the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),.Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The overall goals of the programs are to meet a number of key objectives as follows: • Remedy past and current discrimination and its effects in DOT assisted contracting; • Ensure non-discrimination in DOT assisted contracts and ensure a "level playing field"; • Meet current legal standards of narrow tailoring and strict scrutiny; • Respond to Congress and the public on key areas of the program; • Improve program administration and efficiency. Under the regulations, the designed DBE Program is under the purview of the Office of Local Assistance at CALTRANS. Local agencies, like Grand Terrace have the following responsibilities: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO 1,�, DBE Program 2000 Agenda Report- December 14, 2000 Page 2of2 • Developing and submitting a DBE Program and Overall Annual Goal to Catrans' DLAE for preliminary review and approval (this was done in October by Staff); • Designating a DBE Liaison Officer to administer the program (John W. Donlevy, Assistant City Manager); • Establishing contract specific goals for DBE participation, as warranted, before submitting a "Request for Authorization"; and • Establishing a bidders list to recruit DBE's for each project. The main aspects of the regulations involve the development of the DBE Program (Attached) and the establishment of specific goals for each program. The DBE Program document is a comprehensive policy document for the management, recruitment and oversight of each federally funded project. It is the responsibility of the DBE Liaison Officer to implement the outlined programs, establish appropriate goals for recruitment of DBE's and act as an independent administrator and provide oversight to the particular projects. For the upcoming Barton Rd. Bridge Project, goals have.been established and it will be the responsibility of the DBE Liaison Officer to manage compliance with the requirements. This item is brought before the City Council for the adoption of the DBE Program, which must be submitted to Caltrans by January 1, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM AND POLICY FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action. RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM AND POLICY r WHEREAS, the Under Federal Guidelines, all entities, both State and Local, which receive Federal funding for transportation related projects, are now required to begin the implementation of programs which will assist and maximize the use of Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE's); and WHEREAS, under Title 49 CFR Part 26, the US Department of Transportation now; mandates "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises" in all projects which involve the' Federal Highway Administration(FHWA), Federal Transit Administration(FTA)and the Federal' Aviation Administration (FAA); and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is in the process of implementing capital projects which will utilize federal funding which will be subject to the regulations imposed under Title 49; and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has prepared a DBE Program and Policy which conforms to the.regulations and will serve as the governing.document for compliance for the expenditure of federal funds; NOW THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS (DBE) ENTERPRISE PROGRAM and authorizes submittal to the Caltrans Office of Local Programs and Assistance; ADOPTED THIS 14`h day of December, 2000 ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. and of the City Council thereof. I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 14' day of December, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: RESOLUTION 99- PAGE 2 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney i I ' STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE The Political Reform'Act requires every local government agency to review its conflict of interest code biennially to determine if it is accurate or, alternatively, that the code must be amended. The conflict of interest code designates employees whose position entails the making or participation in the making of governmental decisions which may have a material effect on any financial interest. This resolution reflects recent changes in personnel/titles. Public officials such as the Council Members, City Manager and City Attorney are specified in - Government.Code Section 87200 and have other reporting requirements.These individuals are not required to be designated in this Code. Staff Recommends Council: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 96-26 AND ADOPTING THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Np; RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 96-26 AND ADOPTING THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, Government Code Section 87300 requires every agency to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code; and WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a Standard Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act; and WHEREAS,. it is further necessary to adopt certain categories of designated employees pursuant to said Standard Conflict of Interest Code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE does hereby resolve, declare determine, and order as follows: SECTION 1. The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et sea., requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission had adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code. It can be incorporated by reference and may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearings to conform to amendments in the Political - Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730 and ,any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference and, along with the attached Appendix in which members and employees are designated and disclosure categories are set forth, constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Grand Terrace. SECTION 2. Designated employees shall file their statements with the City of Grand Terrace which will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Gov.Code Section 81008). Statements for all designated employees will be retained by the'City of Grand Terrace. SECTION 3. The City's existing Conflict of Interest Code, Resolution No. 96-26 is hereby repealed in its entirety. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 141h day of December, 2000. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000- was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 141h day of December, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: r NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney APPENDIX "A" RESOLUTION NO. 2000- The following is a listing of those persons who are required to submit Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700 Filers) pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended: CITY MANAGER'S DEPARTMENT DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES Executive Assistant to the City Manager 4,11,12 CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT City Clerk 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Assistant City Manager 1 Director of Child Care Services 2,4 Code Enforcement Officer 3,4,5,6,7,8 BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS/HOUSING Director of Building, Safety & Public Works 1 City Engineer 3,4,5,6,7,8 Sr. Building/Safety Inspector 3,4,5,6,7,8 Management Analyst 3,4,5,6,7,8 a COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Community Development Director 1 Associate Planner 3,4,5,6,7,8 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Director 1 Finance Assistant 3,4,5,9,10 Account Clerk 3,4,5,9,10 Consultants* 1 * The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this conflict of interest code. APPENDIX "B" RESOLUTION NO. 2000- APPENDIX OF DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES CATEGORY 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, sources of income and . interests in real property. 2. Investments and business positions in business entities, and all sources of income. 3. Interests in real property located in the City, including property located within a two mile radius of any property owned or used by the City. 4. Investments, business positions, and sources of income of the type which provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment of the type utilized by the city. 5. Investments, business positions, and sources of income of the type which are subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the City. 6. Investments, business positions, and sources of income of the type which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. 7. Investments, business positions, and sources of income from sources engage in construction, building, or material supply. 8. Investments, business positions, and sources of income from construction firms involved in construction projects subject to acceptance by the City Council. 9. Investments, business positions, and sources of income of the type which the City is empowered to invest its funds. 10. Investments, business positions, and sources of income from financial�institutions including, but not limited to,banks,savings and loan associations and credit unions. 11. Investments, business positions,and sources of income from employment agencies or entities which provide employment or pre-employment services. Services include, but are not limited to testing, training, consulting, job classification studies and salary surveys. 12. Investments, business positions,.and sources of income from business entities which are of the type to provide any of the various types of employee insurance coverage and/or actuarial services. http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaVRe:gs/I 8730.htn (Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission,Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.) 18730. Provisions of Conflict of Interest Codes (a)Incorporation by reference of the terms of this regulation along with the designation of employees and the formulation of disclosure categories in the Appendix referred to below constitute the adoption and promulgation of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code Section 87300 or the amendment of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code Section 87306 if the terms of this regulation are substituted for terns of a conflict of interest code already in effect. A code so amended or adopted and promulgated requires the reporting of reportable items in a manner substantially equivalent to the requirements of Article 2 of Chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq. The requirements of a conflict of interest code are in addition to other requirements of the Political Reform Act, such as the general prohibition against conflicts of interest contained in Government Code Section 87100, and to other state or local laws pertaining to conflicts of interest. (b)The terms of a conflict of interest code amended or adopted and promulgated pursuant to this regulation are as follows: (1) Section 1. Definitions. The definitions contained in the Political Reform Act of 1974, regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission (2 Cal. Code of Regs. Sections 18100, et seq.), and any amendments to the Act or regulations, are incorporated by reference into this conflict of interest code. (2) Section 2. Designated Employees. The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests. (3) Section 3. Disclosure Categories.This code does not establish any disclosure obligation for those designated employees who are also specified in Government Code Section 87200 if they are designated in this code in that same capacity or if the geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction in which those persons must report their financial interests pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 87200, et seq. In addition, this code does not establish any disclosure obligation for any designated employees who are designated in a conflict of interest code for another agency, if all of the following apply: (A)The geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction of the other agency; (B)The disclosure assigned in the code of the other agency is the same as that required under Article 2 of Chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 87200; and (C)The filing officer is the same for both agencies." - Such persons are covered by this code for disqualification purposes only. With respect to all other designated employees, the disclosure categories set forth in the Appendix specify which kinds of financial interests are reportable. Such a designated employee shall disclose in his or her statement of economic interests those financial interests he or she has which are of the kind described in the disclosure categories to which he or she is assigned in the Appendix. It has been determined that the financial interests set forth in a designated employee's disclosure categories are the kinds of financial interests which he or she __ gni�nnn in�n a http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaYRegs/I 8730.htr foreseeably can affect materially through the conduct of his or her office. (4) Section 4. Statements of Economic Interests: Place of Filing. The code reviewing body shall instruct all designated employees within its code to file statements of economic interests with the agency or with the code reviewing body, as provided by the code reviewing body in the agency's conflict of interest code.0 (5) Section 5. Statements of Economic Interests: Time of Filing. (A)Initial Statements. All designated employees employed by the agency on the effective date of this code, as originally adopted, promulgated and approved by the code reviewing body, shall file statements within 30 days after the effective date of this code. Thereafter, each person already in a position when it is designated by an amendment to this code shall file an initial statement within 30 days after the effective date of the amendment. (B) Assuming Office Statements. All persons assuming designated positions after the effective date of this code shall file statements within 30 days after assuming the designated positions, or if subject to State Senate confirmation, 30 days after being nominated or appointed. (C) Annual Statements. All designated employees shall file statements no later than April 1. (D)Leaving Office Statements. All persons who leave designated positions shall file statements within 30 days after leaving office. (5.5) Section 5.5. Statements for Persons Who Resign Prior to Assuming Office. Any person who resigns within 12 months of initial appointment, or within 30 days of the date of notice provided by the filing officer to file an assuming office statement, is not deemed to have assumed office or left office, provided he or she did not make or participate in the making of, or use his or her position to influence any decision and did not receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment as a result of his or her appointment. Such persons shall not file either an assuming or leaving office statement. (A) Any person who resigns a position within 30 days of the date of a notice from the filing officer shall do both of the following: (1)File a written resignation with the appointing power; and (2)File a written statement with the filing officer declaring under penalty of perjury that during the period between appointment and resignation he or she did not make, participate in the making, or use the position to influence any decision of the agency or receive, or become entitled to receive, any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. (6) Section 6. Contents of and Period Covered by Statements of Economic Interests. (A) Contents of Initial Statements. Initial statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the effective date of the code and income received during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the code. (B) Contents of Assuming Office Statements. Assuming office statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the date of assuming office or, if subject to State Senate confirmation or appointment, on the date of nomination, and income received during the 12 months prior to the date of assuming office or the date of being appointed or nominated, F 9/1/2000 10:30 P http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaL/Regs/I 8730.htn respectively. (C) Contents of Annual Statements. Annual statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real,property, income and business positions held or received during the previous calendar year provided, however, that.the period covered by an employee's first annual statement shall begin on the effective date of the code or the date of assuming office whichever is later. (D) Contents of Leaving Office Statements. Leaving office statements shall disclose reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the period between the closing date of the last statement filed and the date of leaving office. (7) Section 7. Manner of Reporting. Statements of economic interests shall be made on forms prescribed by the Fair Political Practices Commission and supplied by the agency, and shall contain the following information: (A) Investments and Real Property Disclosure. When an investment or an interest in real property u is required to be reported,f4l the statement shall contain the following: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held, and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property exceeds one thousand dollars ($1,000), exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). (B)Personal Income Disclosure. When personal income is required to be reported, the statement shall contain: 1. The name and address of each source of income aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; 2. A statement whether the aggregate value of income from each source, or in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was one thousand dollars ($1,000) or less, greater than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); 3. A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value of the gift; and the date on which the gift was received; 5. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if any, given for the loan and the term of the loan. (C)Business Entity Income Disclosure. When income of a business entity, including income of a sole 9/1/2000 1030 Al http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaVRegs/I 8730.htn proprietorship, is required to be reported, the statement shall contain: 1. The name, address, and a general description of the business activity of the business entity; 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the filer's pro rata\share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (D)Business;Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, a designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or in which he or she holds any position of management, a description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. (E) Acquisition or Disposal During Reporting Period. In the case of an annual or leaving office statement, if an investment or an interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. i (8) Section S. Prohibition on Receipt of Honoraria. (A)No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept any honorarium from any source,if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests.This section shall not apply to any part-time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (a), (b), and(c) of Government Code Section 89501 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. This section shall not limit or prohibit payments, advances, or reimbursements for travel and related lodging and subsistence authorized by Government Code Section 89506. (8.1) Section 8.1 Prohibition on Receipt of Gifts in Excess of$300. (A)No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept gifts with a total value of more than $300 in a calendar year from any single source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests.This section shall not apply to any part-time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (e), (f), and(g) of Government Code Section 89503 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. (8.2) Section 8.2. Loans to Public Officials. (A)No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member,or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the elected officer holds office or over which the elected officer's agency has direction and control. d of 0 9/1/2000 10:30 A http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaYRegs/I 8730-hu (B)No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and(g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the public official holds office or over which the public official's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (C)No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall,from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. (D)No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction,if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (E)This section shall not apply to the following: 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of an elected officer or candidate for elective office. 2. Loans made by a public official's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such persons, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans from a person which, in the aggregate, do not exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250) at any given time. 4. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (8.3) Section 8.3. Loan Terms. (A)Except as set forth in subdivision (B), no elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan of five hundred dollars ($500) or more, except when the loan is in writing and clearly states the terms of the loan, including the parties to the loan agreement, date of the loan, amount of the loan, term of the loan, date or dates when payments shall be due on the loan and the amount of the payments, and the rate of interest paid on the loan. (B)This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: c _rn nni�rnn n.�n . . http://www.fppc.ca.govALegaMegs(I 8730.htn 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of the elected officer. 2. Loans made to the elected officer by his or her spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild,brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law,nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (C) Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provision of Title 9 of the Government Code. (8.4) Section 8.4. Personal Loans. (A)Except as set forth in subdivision (B), a personal loan received by any designated employee shall become a gift to the designated employee for the purposes of this section in the following circumstances: 1. If the loan has a defined date or dates for repayment, when the statute of limitations for filing an action for default has expired. 2. If the loan has no defined date or dates for repayment, when one year has elapsed from the later of the following: a.The date the loan was made. b. The date the last payment of one hundred dollars ($100) or more was made on the loan. c. The date upon which the debtor has made payments on the loan aggregating to less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) during the previous 12 months. (B)This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. A loan made to the campaign committee of an elected officer or a candidate for elective office. 2. A loan that would otherwise not be a gift as defined in this title. 3. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor has taken reasonable action to collect the balance due. 4. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor,based on reasonable business considerations, has not undertaken collection action. Except in a criminal action, a creditor who claims that a loan is not a gift on the basis of this paragraph has the burden of proving that,'the decision for not taking collection action was based on reasonable business considerations. 5. A loan made to a debtor who has filed for bankruptcy and the loan is ultimately discharged in bankruptcy. (C)Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provisions of Title 9 of the Government Code. 6 of q y 1-12000 10-'0 AT http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaVRegs/18730.bt (9) Section 9. Disqualification. No designated employee shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the making of any governmental decision which he or she knows or has reason to know will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the official or a member of his or her immediate family or on: (A) Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; (B) Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; (C) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to,received by or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made; (D) Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or (E)Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating $300 or more provided to; received by, or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (9.3) Section 9.3. Legally Required Participation. No designated employee shall be prevented from making or participating in the making of any decision to the extent his or her participation is legally required for the decision to be made. The fact that the vote of a designated employee who is on a voting body is needed to break a tie does not make his or her participation legally required for purposes of this section. (9.5) Section 9.5. Disqualification of State Officers and Employees. In addition to the general disqualification provisions of Section 9, no state administrative official shall make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence any governmental decision directly relating to any contract where the state administrative official knows or has reason to know that any party to the contract is a person with whom the state administrative official, or any member of his or her immediate family has, within 12 months prior to the time when the official action is to be taken: (A)Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public, regarding any investment or interest in real property; or (B)Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public regarding the rendering of goods or services totaling in value one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. (10) Section 10. Manner of Disqualification. When a designated employee determines that he or she should not make a governmental decision because he or she has a disqualifying interest in it, the determination not to act must be accompanied by disclosure of the disqualifying interest. In the case of a voting body, this determination and disclosure shall be made part of the agency's official record; in the case of a designated employee who is the head of an agency, this determination and disclosure shall be made in writing to his or her appointing authority; and in the case of other designated employees, this determination and disclosure shall be made in writing to the designated employee's supervisor. http://www.fppc.ca.govdegal/Regs/I 8730.huT (11) Section 11. Assistance of the Commission and Counsel. Any designated employee who is unsure of his or her duties under this code may request assistance from the Fair Political Practices Commission pursuant to Government Code Section 83114 or from the attorney for his or her agency, provided that nothing in this section requires the attorney for the agency to issue any formal or informal opinion. (12) Section 12. Violations. This code has the force and effect of law. Designated employees violating any provision of this code are subject to the administrative, criminal and civil sanctions provided in the Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000- 91015. In addition, a decision in relation to which a violation of the disqualification provisions of this code or of Government Code Section 87100 or 87450 has occurred may be set aside as void pursuant to Government Code Section 91003. Note: Authority: Section 83112, Government Code. •r Reference: Sections 87103(e), 87300-87302, 89501, 89502, and 89503, Government Code. Histo " (1) New section filed 4-2-80 as an emergency; effective upon filing. Certificate of Compliance included. (2) Editorial correction. (3) Amendment of subsection (b) filed 1-9-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (4) Amendment of subsection (b)(7)(B)l. filed 1-26-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (5) Amendment of subsection (b)(7)(A) filed 11-10-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter. l (6) Amendment filed 4-13-87; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (7) Amendment of subsection (b)filed 10-21-88; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (8) Amendment filed 8-28-90; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (9) Amendment filed 8-7-92; effective thirtieth day thereafter. (10) Amendment filed 2-5-93; effective upon filing. (11) Amendment filed 3-14-95; effective upon filing. (12) Amendment filed 10-23-96; effective upon filing. (13) Amendment filed 4-9-97; effective upon filing. (14) Amendment filed 8-24-98; effective upon filing. (15) Amendment filed 5-11-99; effective upon filing. 1:Designated employees who are required to file statements of economic interests under any other agency's conflict of interest code, or under Article 2 for a different jurisdiction, may expand their statement of economic interests to cover reportable interests in both jurisdictions, and file copies of this expanded c�f 9/1/2000 10:;0?,'. http://www.fppc.ca.gov/LegaL/Regs/I 87301L statement with both entities in lieu of filing separate and distinct statements, provided that each copy of such expanded statement filed in place of an original is signed and verified by the designated employee as if it were an original. See Government Code Section 81004. 2. See Government Code Section 81010 and 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18115 for the duties of filing officers and persons in agencies who make and retain copies of statements and forward the originals to the filing officer. 3. For the purpose of disclosure only (not disqualification), an interest in real property does not include the principal residence of the filer. 4. Investments and interests in real property which have a fair market value of less than $1,000 are not investments and interests in real property within the meaning of the Political Reform Act. However, investments or interests in real property of an individual include those held by the individual's spouse and dependent children as well as a pro rata share of any investment or interest in real property of any business entity or trust in which the individual, spouse and dependent children own, in the aggregate, a direct, indirect or beneficial interest of 10 percent or greater. 5. A designated employee's income includes his or her community property interest in the income of his or her spouse but does not include salary or reimbursement for expenses received from a state, local or federal government agency. 6. Income of a business entity is reportable if the direct, indirect or beneficial interest of the filer and the filer's spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition,the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is required only if the clients or customers are within one of the disclosure categories of the filer. r� 9/1/2000 10:30 A THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 0 Y,r s; � STKAF K.EPORT c1Tr . GROND TERR C CRA ITEM( ) COUNCIL ITEM(X ) MEETING DATE : December 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: COMBINED CASH AND INVESTMENTS TREASURY REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED XX The CRA and City are required to present quarterly investment reports to their governing boards in accordance with Government Code Section 53646 (b)(1)...(3). The report would include all moneys held by the Agency or City and all moneys held by third parties that belong to the Agency or City with the exception of any pension or deferred compensation moneys This code section requires that: 1) Report must be produced 30 days after end of quarter, 2)Report must comment on compliance with investment policy, 3) Report must comment if agency has ability to meet expenditures for next six months, 4) Report must include a description of the investment, type of investment, issuer, investment pool or program information, date of maturity and amount invested, 5)Report must include book value and current market value of each investment, 6)Report must indicate source of the market valuation. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO-,� THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Page 2 The CRA and City have engaged the consulting division of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants(VTD), to assist the agencies in preparation of a combined investment report. The scope of their work will entail a review of the quarterly investment statements and bank statements, a compliance review with the investment policy and government code, obtaining market valuations and preparing the report. The cost of the service is $6,000 which will be reimbursed 100% by SB 90, State Mandated Cost Reimbursement. Reimbursement funding for investment reporting was included at the last moment in the new State budget. Staff would like to continue with investment reporting assistance from VTD as long as the State continues funding reimbursement for this line item. The report is included with the CRA agenda item. Staff welcomes any questions or comments from the City Council. Staff Recommends that the City Council : Accept the Combined Cash and Investments Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000. 'ITS w+Mo Community Services Department Staff Report CITY±COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: PROHIBITION OF SKATEBOARDING, BICYCLING AND ROLLERSKATING- AZURE HILLS CHURCH NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND: Under Chapter.12.52 of the City's Municipal Code, the ability to prohibit skateboarding, bicycling and rollerskating in designated areas is allowed. Under the Code, designation of areas allows the posting of the prohibition and the issuance of citations. DISCUSSION: Over the past number of years, the Azure Hills Seventh Day Adentist Church has experienced a significant amount of propery damage and vandalism to the church and school grounds which can be attributed to skateboarding. Specifically, ornamental furniture, parking stops and benches have been damaged and the grounds have experienced damage and vandalism. Staff has received a request from the Azure Hills Church to allow enforcement of Chapter 12.52 of the Municipal Code. This requires the City Council to designate the area through the adoption of a Resolution of the City. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt: A RESOLUTION OF-THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, `CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING SKATEBOARDING, BICYCLING AND ROLLERSKATING IN DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE AZURE HILLS CHURCH AREAS AND SCHOOL GROUNDS COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.Oki -, Azure Hills Seventh-day Adventist Church 22633 Barton Road • Grand Terrace • California 92313 'M 909.825.8611 November 28, 2000 John W. Donlevy, Jr. Assistant City Manager City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 Re: Request for designation as a non rollerskating etc. private property. Dear Mr. Donlevy: The Azure Hills Seventh-day Adventist Church is requesting the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace to designate all property owned by the church located in the city limits of Grand Terrace as a no rollerskating etc. area. This request is in compliance with 12.52.040 and would ban rollerskating, skateboarding or bicycling and the use of similar devices such as skooters or rollerblades which are not specified in the ordinance but are in keeping with the intent. Upon approval of this request to the city council, the appropriate and necessary signs will be posted as specified in 12.52.050. In consultation with our insurance carriers and risk managers we will be taking specific steps to reduce the attractiveness of our property as a place for rollerskating etc. Thank you for your support and cooperation. Sincerely, Alger L. Keough Executive Pastor RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING SKATEBOARDING, BICYCLING AND ROLLERSKATING IN DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE AZURE HILLS CHURCH AREAS AND SCHOOL GROUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace, under Chapter 12.52 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, has established the ability of the City Council to-prohibit the use of Skateboards, Rollerskates and Bicycles in designated areas of the City, including both public and private, properties; and WHEREAS, the use of Skateboards, Rollerskates and Bicycles can cause hazards to the general public and the potential for personal injuries and property damage by their use in certain areas open to public access and uses; and WHEREAS, the Azure Hills Seventh Day Adventist Church has, pursuant to Section 12.52.040, requested authority for the enforcement of Chapter 12.52 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code at their facilities by prohibiting the use of Skateboards, Rollerskates and Bicycles and allow for the issuance of citations if used in the designated facilities; and NOW THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council prohibits the use of Skateboards, Rollerskates and Bicycles in the following designated areas; 1. Azure Hills Church Grounds and School areas, 22633 Barton Road ADOPTED THIS 14`h day of December, 2000. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. and of the City Council thereof. RESOLUTION 00- PAGE 2 I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 14' day of December, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney IT GRAND TERR C Community and Economic Development Department - STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14,,2000 FUNDING REQUIRED: $60,000 NO FUNDING REQUIRED Redevelopment Project Fund 32 SUBJECT: Authorization for multi jurisdictional nomination of an STP Project for improvements to the intersection of Iowa at'Main Street as a TEA-21, Surface Transportation Project. RECOMMENDATION: Review and Approve the attached Resolution in support of our Application. Background: The intersection of Iowa and Main Street is the only intersection that if improved, will allow proper circulation and access to.Interstate 215 from our Commercial/Industrial Area. Currently, traffic traveling via Michigan and Main and in the future Commerce Way and Main, makes this intersection fundamental for the development of the area west of Michigan. Even though it is outside of Grand Terrace, this intersection is the gateway to our commercial area. A few years ago, two billboards were installed in the Iowa right-of-way. Improvements to this intersection included in the 1-215 PSR Report were postponed indefinitely due to the City of Riverside priority regarding the 1-91, 1-60 and 1-215 freeway interchange. The improvements of this intersection looked less and less likely. However, we did not give up! Recently, we received the support of the County of Riverside and the City of Colton to submit a multi jurisdictional application for the improvement of the Iowa/Main Street intersection. Our Traffic Engineer, Craig Neustaedter, stated the traffic analysis showed significant problems. This situation will help our application score well in the selection process. 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-52dt ( E2A- d! ITEM' NQ Page Two Staff Report Redevelopment Project Fund 32 We are very pleased to resolve this problem in a manner satisfactory to all three parties by possibly qualifying for a grant. The County as well as the City of Colton have pledged $50,000, each. Should the Council approve funding of $50,000 from Redevelopment Project Fund 32, we will likely score high in co-funding as well. Please note the Redevelopment Agency Resolution for actual appropriation of funds will be submitted at a later date. r PM.pg Attachments: Resolution Letter to Ty Schuiling, SANBAG, 11/29/00 w\pg\planning\ccreport\12-14-00meeting.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 00- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AUTHORIZING NOMINATION OF AN STP PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT TO THE INTERSECTION OF IOWA AVENUE AT MAIN STREET AS A TEA-21, SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA 21) was enacted into law as U.S.C. Title 23, and WHEREAS, as a result of the TEA 21 legislation, there is approximately $12.0 million of unallocated Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds that are available to agencies in the Valley Region of San Bernardino County, and WHEREAS, STP funds are available to local governments which provide a requisite local funding share for specific eligible activities as defined by the TEA 21 legislation, and WHEREAS, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has been authorized by state legislation to have discretion over the allocation of funds for the STP, and . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace possesses the legal authority to nominate transportation projects and to finance, acquire and construct projects that are eligible for STP funding, and WHEREAS, improvements to the intersection of Main Street at Iowa Avenue are of shared interest and benefit to the cities of Grand Terrace and Colton and the County of Riverside, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, THAT: 1. City staff is authorized to work with the City of Colton to nominate a project for improvements to the intersection of Main Street at Iowa Avenue to SANBAG for funding under the STP Program. 2. Patrizia Materassi, as the City of. Grand Terrace Director of Community and Economic Development, is authorized, as the official representative of the City of Grand Terrace to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required. 3. The City staff is authorized to propose a local match of up to $50,000, appropriated from the City Redevelopment Funds. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Cij Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the 14 h day of December, 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brenda Stanfill Byron Matteson City Clerk Mayor 0 29 November;00 GRAND TERR CLI Community and Economic Development Department Ty Schuiling Director of Planning and Programming San Bernardino Association of Governments 472 North Arrowhead Avenue ��. San Bernardino CA 92401 Subject: Support for the City of Colton's Surface Transportation Program (STP) Application for Intersection Improvements on Iowa Avenue at Main Street. Dear Ty, The City of. Grand Terrace is pleased to support the City of Colton's STP application for improvement to the intersection of Iowa Avenue at Main Street. This intersection provides access to 1-215 for residents and employees of the southern part of Grand Terrace. In addition, it is a' truck route serving .adjacent industrial areas. Most importantly, the intersection is the gateway to the City's future High Tech Center. Because of the high competing demand by commuters and truckers, and the limited existing capacity, the intersection acts as a 'choke point for traffic and causes severe congestion and delays. This problem can be eliminated by implementation of the proposed TEA-21 project. The proposed project will relieve traffic congestion on a route of regional significance and enhance the economic viability of Grand Terrace's major employment center. For these reasons, we are committed to assist the City of Colton in providing matching funds for the project. The City is prepared to' contribute up to $50,000 to assist in making this project a reality. Attached is a copy of a draft Resolution endorsing this project. The resolution will be submitted for approval by our City Council on December ` 14, 2000. Please feel free to contact Patrizia Materassi,' our Community and Economic Development Director, if we can be of further assistance concerning this project. Sinc M, Thomas Schwab City Manager TS.pg Enclosure: Draft Resolution 22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE NO V 2 . 2000 Regular Meeting MINUTES CITY CLERK October 9, 2000 The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular monthly meeting at the Senior Center, Grand Terrace, California at 1800 hours. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Philomene Spisak, JoAnn Johnson, Dottie Raborn, Lewis Neeb, Richard Rollins and Hugh Forbes. MEMBERS ABSENT: Claire McEtwee(ezcused for medical reasons) CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT None GUEST PRESENT: Bob Stewart, Citizen Patrol AGENDA: The Agenda of the meeting was reviewed by the members present for their approval. Lewis Neeb made the motion to accept as written with JoAnn Johnson making the second. The motion carried unanimously. MINUTES: The minutes of the meeting of September 11,2000 were distributed to the members present for their approval. Lewis Neeb made the motion to accept as written with JoAnn Johnson making the second. The motion carried unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE: Philomene Spisak advised the Committee that the Council had prepared and sent a letter to Bitsy Bernor accepting her letter of resignation as a member of the Committee BUDGET: Dottie Raborn submitted the monthly report on the Committee's budget stating that $141.00 had been spent on office supplies leaving a balance of$7,619.59 remaining in the Crime Prevention Committee's annual budget. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: The tire pumps for the Citizen Patrol vehicles are to be purchased by Tanya Cahill, SSS & CSO Discussion around the various credit card scams and illegal identification card uses based upon the preparing of false identification of many kinds has become prevalent and caution should be taken to prevent credit card usage and submitting credit card numbers on the Internet or telephone. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO®�I(A NEW BUSINESS: 1. Discussion regarding Red Ribbon Week, the last week of October and what is being proposed this year. 2. The Halloween Haunt to be held at Pico Park again this year is to be sponsored by many volunteer groups all of which are requesting donations in order to purchase candy and gifts for the children. 3. The Women's Club will be setting up tables to sell hot dogs and soft drinks. Other volunteer organization will be manning game booths supplied by the City such as the P.T.A., headed by Principal Jordan, the Lions Club, the Soccer Club, members of the Little League organization and members of the Crime Prevention Committee who planned to have donations jars at strategic locations. It was reported that nearly $1,000.00 had already been acquired for the event which begins at 1700 hours and concludes at approximately 2000 hours. 4. A motion was made by Lewis Neeb to donate$250.00 from the Committee's budget to support the program. MEMBER REPORTS.: Lewis Neeb reported that 312 hours of patrol time had been logged by the Citizen Patrol for the month of September with a total accumulated time for the year 3,153 hours. The Sheriffs Department computes a value cost for this volunteer service which is quite substantial. There being no further business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 1915 hours. Respectfu submitted RICHARD ROLLINS Recording Secretary CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE N 0 V 2 00 2000 Regular Meeting MINUTES CITY CLERK November 6, 2000 The Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee met for the Regular Meeting on Monday, November 6th at the regular time in the Emergency Operations Center at 22795 Barton Road, Building 3 at Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Chairperson, Sonia Aiken. MEMBERS PRESENT were Chairperson, Sonia Aikin, Vic Pfennighausen, JoAnn Johnson and Robert Souter. MEMBERS ABSENT- Richard Haubert, Hugh Forbes and Alternate, Gary Eldridge. CITY STAFF - None. GUESTS PRESENT -None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of August 7, 2000 and September 11, 2000 were formally given, but had previously been sent to Council. The October 1, 2000 meeting had been canceled. LIAISON REPORT-None, since John Donlevy was on vacation. EOC SET-UP TRAINING- It was determined that each future meeting will concentrate on one or two boxes and familiarity of contents and responsibilities of that particular area of preparedness. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REPORT a. Vic reported that the radio is back and has been repaired. b. He will order nickel hydrite batteries for the HT's. Cost is about $60 each. Will need four. c. He reported that currently the plan is to bring the road past the front of the buildings, around,the east building and into the new storage area.d. All communications equipment is functioning. e. Generator will be run for four hours as a test on November 9th. OLD BUSINESS -None. NEW BUSINESS -None ADJOURNMENT at 7:27 p.m.. $�gspectfully submitted, i- JoAnn Jo. n, Secretary NEXT MEETING WILL BE MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2000 AT 7 p.m. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NOS,�� CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Historical & Cultural.Activities Committee N 0 V 2 $ 2000 Minutes for October 30, 2000 Special Meeting CITY C,FRK The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were Pauline, Barbara Tinsley, Ann Petta, Judy McBride, Brenda Stanfill, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen Edmundson and Hannah Laister. Country Fair: Ann reported 37 Arts & Crafts vendors, 15 children's cookie contest, 29 chili and baking contest: She also reported extra help of Shirley Hogue,Lennie Frost,Joanne Carlstrom. Judy has Juanita Bigelow, Sarah Green and Shirley Bennett. Shelly has volunteered to do face painting, 50 cents a cheek. Ann made a motion seconded by Barbara,for Shelly to buy gold labels for children's prize,balloons, face paint and poster board. All were in favor. Pauline purchased 50 ribbons for cooking contest. Judges will be: Jim Hall, Toastmasters, Anna Betten, Chamber of Commerce, Vickie Doyle; Woman's Club, Byron Matteson,Lion's, Dan Buchanan, City Council. Prize Drawing will be at 2:30 p.m.Tickets 3 for$1.Clean Up:Tony Petta,Hugh Grant and Dennis Rosenkild will help. City Map for Colton-Grand Terrace:The committee picked out picture to lend people preparing this book. The Daisy Boussard house was chosen to be given by Brenda to Aloha Roberts,Riverside. The committee was asked by Mary Miller of the Chamber when to present plaque to Mayor Matteson at the Birthday Party. It was decided this would be done at the dinner. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Regular meeting will be Monday November 6, 2000. Respectfully Submitted, ll llJJ J � . Hannah Laister Secretary COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. , CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Historical & Cultural Activities Committee NO V 2 8 2000 Minutes for November 6, 2000 CITY CLERK The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. by Chairman Pauline Grant. Those present were Pauline, Barbara Tinsley, Ann Petta, Judy McBride, Brenda Stanfill, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen Edmundson and Hannah Laister. The Secretary's minutes for October were read and approved on motion by Barbara seconded by Ann all in favor as read. The Treasurer's report shows $264.65 realized at the fair, Budget balance $1103.17,Petty Cash $73.51. Judy made motion to accept, seconded by Ann, all in favor. Historical Report: Ann is trying to get replies, hopefully before too long. Country Fair:Barbara presented a list of things she saw which needed to be discussed for next year. Shelly turned in pictures of the fair, Hannah turned in pictures of the Senior Center addition dedication and the Volunteer Picnic. Ann reported there were 32 vendors with 8 not showing. She talked to all of the vendors during the day and all seemed pleased. Doughnut price will be raised to 40 cents and coffee to 50 cents. Left over crackers will be given to the Child Care Center. The final judges were Nancy Hassard, Woman's Club, Byron Matteson, Lions, Anna Betton, Chamber of Commerce,Jim Hall,Toastmasters, and Dan Buchanan, Council. Birthday Party December 14: Ann will get a 10 pound ham and cook it, Pauline will have turkey done, Pauline and Hannah will bake lasagna, Ann will get sliced bread and butter, Brenda will get half sheet chocolate cake, Judy will prepare punch,Brenda, coffee, Ann, water, Colleen, ice. We will plan for 110 people. Hannah and Colleen will get supplies,Judy will do decorations. Ann will prepare diagram. Dinner will be from 6 to 7:30 p.m. Calendar for 2001 - will do this in December. The next meeting will be December 4'h. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Hannah Laister Secretary 0 GRAND TER R c Community and Economic Development Department STAlF71,REPORT CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: December 14,2000 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Proposed Fee Ordinance Increasing the Planning Fees RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 4, ' Chapter 4.88,of the Municipal Code by Revising the Schedule for Fees Related to Planning Activities Background: A recent survey has indicated that,the City of Grand Terrace has some of the lowest fees of any jurisdiction in the.area. With the recent events which have,greatly affected the City's financial - resources,the City Manager has requested that the Planning fees be brought more into line with the fees-of other jurisdictions and also that more of the actual costs associated with processing development applications be recovered through the processing fees. 'In addition,to encourage the economic development of the City, it is our goal to make the new fees competitive with the other cities and jurisdictions in the Inland Empire. The proposal to increase the planning fees was discussed with the Planning Commission at its meeting of June 15, 2000. (Please see the Commission's minutes of June 15, 2000 for a detailed review of the discussion.) They concluded that an increase in Planning fees is warranted;that as much of the costs involved in processing applications should be recovered with the provision that the fees should still be competitive with the surrounding jurisdictions. Additional comments were made that the proposed fee increases should not fall too heavily on those City residents with small projects and that there should be a slight reduction in fees where multiple applications have been made. The proposed Ordinance has attempted to reflect the guidance and comments made by the Planning Commission on June 15t'. Attached to this memorandum is the proposed Ordinance to increase the planning fees in Chapter 1 4.88 of the Municipal Code. The proposed Ordinance includes an Exhibit"A"showing the proposed changes. Items to be deleted from the code have been struck out and items to be added have been shown in bold. For your information,the staff used the following criteria or rationale to come up with the new fees, some of which came from the Planning Commission's review discussed above: 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 923l3-YCWftfk ftfiWbA 1-177q • New fees should try to recover as much of the cost involved. • The new fees should still result in the City's planning fees being similar to those of surrounding jurisdictions. • The fees should not be too burdensome for the local businesses or residents with a small project. • The cost analysis was done by listing each individual step.to perform a planning activity such as a conditional use permit; the amount of time to perform each step or task;whom among the staff would most likely perform this function; how long; and their hourly rate including overhead. • Salaries at the top step with overhead(figures supplied by the City's Finance _ Department)were used to get upper limit of costs. • In order to try and stay competitive and to reduce overestimates,most of the higher fees were reduced by a factor of 25% to come up with a final recommendation. As a comparison of the proposed new fees with other areas,the staff has included a table, Table 1, showing a "fee survey" of nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation: The staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing on the Proposed Ordinance, receive any testimony regarding the increase in fees and close the public hearing. Following the hearing, adopt the first reading of the Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 4.88, of the Municipal Code thereby revising the schedule for planning fees. The City Attorney has indicated that as a purely administrative matter,this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Respectfully submitted, a John Lampe Patrizia Materassi Associate Planner Community' and Economic Development Director PM:JL.jI Attachment 1: Proposed Ordinance to Amend Title 4,Chapter 4.88,of the Municipal Code and Revising the Schedule for Fees related to Planning Activities Attachment 2: "Exhibit A" revisions to Chapter 4.88 - Planning Fees Attachment3. Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions - Table 1 cAMyFi1esU0HN\Fees\md00-01 council.rpt 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AMENDING TITLE 4 , CHAPTER 4.88, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND REVISING THE SCHEDULE FOR FEES RELATED TO THE PLANNING ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: `- Section 1. Title 4, Chapter 4.88 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code is hereby amended and the revised chapter 4.88,which is herewith included as Exhibit"A," is hereby adopted. Section 2. Conflicts and Ambiguities --In the event of any conflicts or ambiguities between the provisions of the ordinance and other provisions of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code,the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. Section 3. Violations - Violation of this Ordinance shall be an infraction and punishment shall not exceed those provided in the Grand Terrace Municipal Code,Chapter 1.16. Each separate violation shall be a separate offense. Section 4. Severabill - If any provision or clause of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional or to be otherwise invalid by any court of competent , jurisdiction,such invalidity shall not affect other Ordinance provisions or clauses or applications thereof which can be implemented without the invalid provisions or clause or application,and of this end the provisions and clauses of the Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 5. Effective Date-This Ordinance_shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 A.M.on the 31st day of its adoption. Section 6. Posting-The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three(3)public places within fifteen (15)days of its adoption, as designated for such purposes by the City Council. Section 7. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 10" day of August and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 241 day of August, 2000. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof: and of the City Council thereof. ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO._ PAGE 2 I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 241 day of August, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: � ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as to form: John Harper, City Attorney c:IMyFilesWOHNINewfeeslfees\Feeordinance EXHIBIT"A" Chapter 4.88 PLANNING FEES Sections: 4.88.010 Planning fees. 4.88.010 Planningfees.ees. Planning fees are as follows: A. Site and Architectural Review. 1. Administrative Site and Architectural Review $260.00 $800.00 2. Standard Site and Architectural Review: a. or site is less than 500 Nuare fee $�G9 99 b. If total area of proposed iMpLoven7en or site is 500 to i,499 squme fee $640.00 c. $i,020:00 d. if total area Of PLOposed itnotovemen $i,466.00 a. Minor Standard Site and Architectural Review $2,700.00 (If total area of proposed improvement is less than 3,000 square feet.) b. Major.Standard Site and Architectural Review $3,600.00 B. Conditional Use Permit. 1. Administrative Conditional Use Permit $266 69 $1,000.00 2. Standard Conditional Use Permit: a. if total area of piopused impovemept or site is less than 50014aare feet: . $2266.09 b. feet. $656 66 C. if total we of proposed�rnpioyenient vi site . 6 d. if tutal atea of proposed imp,ovenzent or site is gteate, than 3,606 square feet. $2,600.00 a. Minor Conditional Use Permit (If total area of proposed improvement is less than 3,000 square feet.) $3,375.00 b. Major Conditional Use Permit $4,500.00 C. _Variance 1. Sign variance $300.60 $500.00 2. Minor,Deviation $366.00 $500.00 3. Standard Variance $1,459:06 $2,500.00 D. General Plan Amendment $ ,966:06 $6,700.00 E. Zone Change $1-,3306.06 $5,850.00 ATTACHMENT 2 F. Specific Plans 1. Initial Specific Plan $3,000.00-plus Cost Recovery staff time $5,000 deposit 2. Specific Plan Amendment $i,350.00 Cost Recovery $3,000 deposit G. Determination of Use $225.06 $500.00 H. Environmental Review 1. fi itial 5t*Initial Environmental Determination $100.00 2. Negative declaration with Initial Study $460.00 $1,000.00 3. Environmental Impact Report, five lindted dollais, Cost Recovery pitis cost of consultant,two thotismid dollar deposft $3,000 deposit ,equited, phis additional cmts 4. Fish and Game a. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors admin- istrative fee $35.00 b. Negative Declaration $1.250.00 C. EIR $850.00 I. Tentative Map. May also require engineering fee 1. Preliminary review $300.00 Hourly rate $500 deposit 2. Minor subdivision(parcel map) $256.00 $3,800.00 Plus$35.00 $50.00 per lot 3. Major subdivision $900.00 $5,500.00 Plus$35.00 $50.00 per lot 4. Revised tentative map(minor or major) $350.66 50%of original fee J. Final Map. May also require engineering fee. 1. Minor Subdivision(parcel map) $256.60 $500.00 2. Major Subdivision 3 69 $700..00 Pitts$25.00 per lo K. Lot Line Adjustment;includes required certificate of compliance;may also require engineering fee, one thousand fifty dollars; L. Lot Merger,may also require engineering fees, five hunded dollars, eight hundred dollars; M. Reversion to Acreage,may also require engineering fee,five handi ed dollat s;one thousand dollars; N. Certificate of Compliance,nine htlLidted dollats; eleven hundred dollars; O. Extensions, two hmidred dollais, 10%of the original fee P. Sign Permit. May also require engineering and-building and safety fees. 1. Standard Sign. $200.00 for all signs a. If total area of sign is thi feet oi less, fifty dollars; b. if total areaofsign is greatei thanthirty-two 2. Overall sign program, thtee handied seventy dolimm,four hundred fifty dollars; 3. Standard sign per approved sign program, ten-dollars;fifty dollars; 4. Temporary sign, fifty dollars,one hundred deposit required;, Q. Land Use Application and Plan check of Working Plans. Swimming pools, spas, patios, decks, accessory structures,walls,fences,and other structures and/or improvements which do not require-site and architectural review, - - , one hundred dollars; R. Alterations to Conditions of Approval,other than for maps or minor design alterations,two hundred dollars;twenty-five percent of the original fee. S. Appeal of Planning Director's Decision, fout litindi ed ninety dolla,s;one thousand dollars; T. Fines per Infraction: 1. Zoning title violation(other than illegal sign),three hundred seventy-five dollars. 2. Illegal sign,two hundred thirty-five dollars. 3. Commercial vehicle parking in residential districts a. First citation $50.00 b. Noncompliance-second citation $75.00 C. Noncompliance-third citation $100.00 U. Code Enforcement Fees to Cover Overhead Costs. = 1. Hazardous structure abatement: a. First notice and posting $50.00 b. Noncompliance--second notice $50.00 C. Filing and processing for demolition $500.00 2. Debris abatement: a. Noncompliance--second notice violation $50.00 b. Follow-up inspections $25.00 3. Sign abatement: a. Noncompliance--second notice violation $25.00 b. Follow-up inspections $25.00 C. Removal of off-site garage sale signs $15.00 d. Removal of all other signs. $100.00 4. Substandard structures: a. Noncompliance--second notice.violation $50.00 = b. Follow-up inspections $25.00 C. Issuance of citation processing $50.00 5. Miscellaneous violations: a. Noncompliance--second notice violation $50.00 b. Follow-up inspecitons $25.00 c:\MyFiles\JOHN\Newfees\fees\chap488exhibitA.Nvpd I Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions -Table 1 (Continuation) Planning Grand Yucaipa Co. San New Grand Fees Terrace Bernardino Terrace Fees Site& Architectural Review Administrative $200 $800 Standard<500❑ $260 - Standard<1499❑ $640 _ Standard<2999❑ $1020 _ Standard>3000❑ $1400 - _ Minor S.A. $2,700 Major S.A. $3 600 Conditional Use ermit Administrative $200 $1,000 Standard<500❑ $260 _ Standard<1499❑ $650 - Standard<2999❑ $1430 _ Standard>3000❑ $2000 $3,400- $4,900- - Actual Cost $13,000 Actual Cost Minor CUP $3,375 Major CUP $4,500 Variance _ Sign Variance $300 $500 Minor Deviation $300 $264 $500 Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions-Table 1 (Continuation) Planning Grand Yucaipa County of Proposed New Fees Terrace San Berdo. Grand Terrace Fees Standard $1450 $2,000- $2,500 Variance Actual Cost General Plan $1900 $4000- $3,000- $6,700 Amendment minor actual cost $5000 - major actual cost Zone Change $1300 $3400- $5,850 actual cost Specific Plans - Initial S.P. $3000+stag $20,000- Cost Recovery time actual cost $5,000 deposit Amendment S.P. $1350 Cost Recovery $3,000 deposit Determination of $225 $185 $605 $500 Use Environmental Review Initial Study $100 $100 Negative $400 $1,000 Declaration , Environmental $500+ $6000- $2,300- Cost Recovery Impact Report Consultant actual cost $7,800 $3,000 deposit (EIR) + Additional Costs ($2000 deposit) Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions- Table 1 (Continuation) Plannin Grand Yucaipa County of Proposed New Fees Terrace San Berdo. Grand Terrace Fees Fish and Game Clerk of Board $35 $35 Negative Dec. $1,250 $1,250 EIR $850 $850 Tentative Man - - ___, Preliminary $300 $4,000- Hourly rate Review actual cost $500 deposit __- Parcel Map $250+ $3000 - $3,645 $3,800 + (Minor Map) $35/lot actual cost $50/lot+$250 engr.fee Major Tentative $900+ $5000(reg.)- $9,266+ $5,500+ Tract Map $35/lot $10000 $45/lot- $50/lot+ (vest)-actual actual cost $1000 engr. cost fee Revised Tentative, $350 50%of original Maior or Minor fee Final Man Parcel Map. $250 $2500 $500+engr.fee (Minor Map) Major Tract $350 $8000 - $700+engr. Map fee Lot Line $750+Engr. $1000 $1,375 $1050 Adjustment Fees Lot Merger $500+ $1000- $755 $800 Engr.Fees actual cost J Reversion to $500+ $3000- $2,100- $1000 ere R Engr. Fees actual cost actual cost i Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions- Table 1 (Continuation) PlanningGrand Yucaipa County of Proposed New Fees Terrace San Berdo. Grand Terrace Fees Certificate of $900 $2000- $2.125 - $1100 Compliance $3000 $3,300 Extensions $200 - $210 10%of original fee Sign Permit Standard <32 ❑ $50 $264 - $170 for all >32 ❑ $200 standard signs Sign Program $370 - - - $450 Standard sign $10 - - $50 per sign program Temporary Sign $10+$50 $20 - $50+$75 deposit deposit Land Use $33 $592 - $75 Clearance A_nnlication/Busi tress License Processina Alterations to $200 $2000-actual $2,100- 25%of original Conditions cost actual cost fee Animal $400 - $1,050 $1;000 Director's Decision Temporary Use same as $434 $375- same as land land use or $1,000 use or admin. cup CUP Home $50 $200 - $100 Occupation Permit cA...planninglj ohn1FEESURVE.2.wpd Now Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions-Table 1 • Planning Grand Chino Colton Corona Fontana Highland Norco Rancho Redlands Riverside San Loma Linda Ontario FM Terrace Cucamonga County Bernardino 5j" S4750- Small$1513 $2851+ $2393-S3850 S 1831 Cost+S266 S2000- S4540 Architectural - SI35 to S1940 - S2225_$4135 S10,750 Large S3915 S2000 S57/du- S4500 Review S285/acre Administrative S700 - - - S600+$40 lot S965 S200 S296 - SIM - - S1935 Sundud<500 O S260 S210 - - - - - - - - - Standard<1499 O $640 S495 - - - - - - - - - - Standard<2999 O S1020 - S788 - - - - - - - - - Slandan!>3000 O S1400 S108810 - - - - - - - - - - S2138 Candlti0nal Use $1611 to S1950+ S3630 S135-S6000 S3035 $2500 $2970+ S1250-S4450 $6904-S9457 S1604 S2000- S35-S3333 Permit $5585 S35/Iol S292/acre S4500 Administrative $200 -- - S985 - $645 S400 S400 - - - - - Standard<5000 S260 Standard<14"❑ S650 - - - - - - - - Standard<2999❑ S 1430 Standard>3000 O S2000 Variance - - - - - - - $360-S1775 31149-S2574 Sign Variance S300 S165 to S1600 - $470 - - - - - - 3350 ? - Minor Deviation S300 S130 S165 $515 S697 $995 S162.50- $170 - - S464 SI00 S65 S325 Standard Variance S1450 S2590 S1020 $2090+ S2425 $1560 $2500 S871 - - - S863 SIM $3617 S 15.50/lot GenernlPion S1900 S391510 SI800 $4550+ S3500-S6975 I Full Cost $4300 $2866+ $5200 S7333-S8160 1 Cost $3780- $7569 Amcndmcm $3845 S15.50/acre $4620 Deposit S287/crre S4100 ' Zone Chooee SI300 S4035 $1375+ S2940 $43�$44665 Full Cost+ Included w/ S2866-$8598 S3300. S3577 Cost S2000 S400-S2726 S35/acrc S3555 Deposit G.P A.Fee +S287/acre 1 a rt n M b rt w Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions • Pinnping Grand Chino Colton Corona Fontana Highland Norco Rancho Redlands Riverside San Loma Linda Ontario &7 Terrace Cucamonga County Bernardino Snecifte Plans - - Cost Recovery Cost Recovery Full Cost+ _ _ _ 15%Admin. 515,660 Deposit Initial S.P. f3000+staff City Initiated 53278+staff 34000 Some as 75one $13000 f18327 Cost $15000 $11225 time only lime Change Amendment S.P. $1350 54242 51375 ''A of original Same as Zone Wo0 S9164 Cost f 10653 Change Dtlerminationof 5225 - $165 f1,895 - No Fee 5315 SIM - 5332 ? S468 4lif I niliai Study floo $915 10$193o S425+530 5800-SI615 51200 5500 5125 $225 S300 S62 7 f265•$535 $978 Negative $400 Included w/ Included w/ w/out mitiga- Included w/ Included w/ Included w/ Included w/ $2750 Included w/ S464 Included w/ Included w/ Declaration Initial Study Initial Study lion$800 Initial Study Initial Study Initial Study Initial Study Initial Study Initial Study Initial Study Environmental 5500+ Actual Cost Cost Recovery with miligalion Cost Recovery Full Cost+ $1000 f5000- Rocuvery,Cost 58439 Cost 5800-55000 S 12752 Impact Report _Consultant+ 51615 +S2000 512,010 SI0000 (FIR) Additional Deposit Deposit Costs(f2000 deposit) Fish and Game - - - - - - - - - Clerk of Board S)5, $35 f76 $35 $35 S78 f35 S35 $78 f35 7 Negative Dec. SI,230 SI,250 SI,250 51250 S1250 $1250 $1,250 51250 $1250 51328 $1250 ? - EIR 5850 5850 - 5850 5850 $850 $850 $850 5850 S929 $850 ? - Tentative Man - - - - - - - Preliminary $300 52690 S70/'/,hour of Full Cost No Fcc No Fee No Fee 5325 Ilourly Rate $1472 f402. f500 - licvicw staff time 2 Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions • PfBRpapg Grand Chino Colton Corona Fontana Highland Norco Rancho Redlands Riverside San Loma Linda Ontario Em Terrace Cucamonga County Bernardino Parcel Map(Minor S250+ S4470+ SI000+ S3445 to S4500+ Full Cost S4000+ $2514 S2750 $551110 S1128+ S1000- S2658 Map) S35/lot S10/I01 S60/I01 S4040 SI00/acre $2610deposit SIO/lot S8259 S53/lot S2000+ S100/lot MejorTenialive S900+ S5980+ S1600-S2750 S4355+ S4740-S7740 S5850+ $4000+ $2987+ S4600 $5702- S1500+ $3000+ S3926 Tract Map S35/lol SIO/la +S351lot S23/lot S62/lot SIO/lot S60ima SI1146 S40/Iut, SIOO/lot Revised Tentative. S350 Sig; $1990 S3570+23/lot - - $1190 S2100- $3800-S5722 5o•/.of 25%of - Major a Mina 0 f srs- S2750 original fee original tee Final Mao Parcel Map(Minor S250 S2130+ S210 $2375• S4500+ S2100 SI000+ - - - Map) S35/la S25/lot S100/acre S30/lot Major Tract Map S350 S2370♦ S 1000+ S2375+ S4740-S7740 S2000+ SI0011+ - - $4094 S35/lot S30/lo1 S27/lot S35/lot S30/lot Lot Lin $750+Engr. S520 S5DO S1385or>2 S1250+S500 S1315 SIOO SI190 $525 S670 S332+S53/la S560 Adiustmenl Fees lots,full cost Engr.Fee lAt Mercer S500+Engr. n/a S300-S500 - - $685 S100 - S1325 S262 - S560 - Fees Reversion to S500+Engr. o/a S1000 S2765 S900+S850 - SIOO - S1525 S977 AMA" Fees Engr.Fee Certificate of S900 No Fee S1000 $955 S500 $530 S100 S1190 5525 S164 to - S460 _ ..._. Comallenee S777/parcel Extensions $200 S600 to SI 100 S300 $655-S1045 50%ofwig. Full Cost+ $100 S549 $235 S332-S685 S332 or 10% S1445 $631 file S390 Deposit of original Sian Permit - 7 - - - Standard <32 O$50 S150 S100 7 $61 S55 S25 S51 S390 ? -- $53 S170 - >32 o S200 ,-;- Sign Program 1 $370 1 S515 S450 ? S697 S155/review - S580 $1240 ? S320 $675-S1350 S1608 - Standard per sign SIO S150 S100 7 - - - - S3%ign ? _ ? - program J Planning Fee Survey of Nearby Jurisdictions • Plannine Grand Chi:t Colton Corona Fontana Highland Norco Rancho Redlands Riverside San Loma Linda Ontario pay Terrace Cucamonga County Bernardino Temporary Sign $10+S50 No Fee No Fee S85+S50 - No Fee $50 S51 $45 7 - S95 - deposit deposit Land Use S33 SI35 S50 SIM - No Fee No Fee S25 S50-S140 - - $41 f25-SI00 AYCIISaliY11 Alterallonsto 5200 S1525-$3430 5300 5300-52355 65%oforig. 5645 51250 5435.$2921 5137510 51831-53806 $402 25%of SI00-S1252 SQIIdl119115 file 52770 original fee Aooeal Director's 5400 S150-33010 73%of $495 SI00-SOBS f63•S630 SI00 S62 $2143 f964 5130 f800 - Decision original app. Temtwnry Use same as cup No Fa No Fa $80 S90 S30-5220 - S68 f I80 f2649 5256-5627 7 $1l9 Ilome Oecuoalion S50 $135 S50 No Fee 5175 S80 - 553 5125-5480 - $199 $106 _ Permit 1 c:�..planning\john1tmsurve.lbl LAW OFME9 OF HARPER&BURNS LLP A LIK=LIABB. Y PAILDWMCP 34Qi10=A MOMSSIbNAL COMM7" ALAI:R DULA CAANGIk CALWOPIUA YMM Af IMSME;a AN fin W nnrn JMWF.HARM* (90p7 61d�9i (714)771-7M CWeou M FAX(M)7M-3370 - MG?tABL MONTOaAar . 'APKQF 13KALM2R)LRTM4 November 28,2000 Mr.John Lampe,Associate Planner City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92324 RE: Adoption of Fee Ordinance Increasing Planning Fees Dear John Pursuant to your request, Tve reviewed the fee study associated with the proposed planning fee ordinance,the effect of which would be to increase planning fees. As you are aware, Government Code Section 66014 (a)provides in relevant part that any such fees shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cast of providing the service for which the fee is charged Section 66016 provides at least ten days prior to the meeting, the City must make available the pertinent data indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost required to provide the service for which the fee is levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide,the service,.essentially the combination of the generalfund"budget information and a fee study of the type which you've done. Pursuant to your request, rve reviewed the fee study information which you've prepared and provided Since virtually no jurisdictions perform the type of cost analysis as detailed as that which you have provided, and since the cost to one agency is not relevant to the cost to be charged by another agency,the survey of nearby:jurisdictions is appropriate for political justification for the fee, but irrelevant to the legal basis for determining the amount of the fee- The only question/comment which I have concerning your excellent time and cost analysis is the determination of the hourly rate charged at each step. Since a city may legitimately charge the fully burdened man hour rate, which includes overhead, the rates on the surface look somewhat low in any case, as apart of the analysis, you should include the basis upon which the hourly rate was calculated. Mr.John Lampe City of Grand Terrace November 28,2000 Page 2 Finally,pursuant to Government Code Section 6017,after the noticed public hearing,the fee is not effective until sixty(60) days following the final'action, or in the case of an ordinance, the second - reading. If you have arty questions or comments,please let me know. Yours truly, John R.Harper City Attorney Cc: Tom Schwab,City Manager C17!' ROMb TER Community Services Department Staff Report COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: 2001-02 CDBG PROGRAM: CITY PROPOSALS NO FUNDING REQUIRED BACKGROUND: Annually, the City, as part of our Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program receives community input regarding projects for the following program year which runs from July through June of each year. This item is presented to receive input and ideas regarding potential projects to be submitted by the City. A more formal public hearing to solicit public priorities regarding-our CDBG needs will be conducted on January 25, 2001. The City's CDBG Program is administered through the County of San Bernardino Department of Economic and Community Development and the City receives an allocation of approximately $37,000 each year. Over the past number of years, the City had accumulated a reserve of funds which amounted to a budget of approximately $126,000. Much of this was utilized during the 1999-00 Fiscal Year, with the Senior Center Building Expansion ($77,000). In 1998 and 1999, the City did not fund any capital projects and alloted approximately $62,000 to Un-Programmed CDBG Fund, leaving a balance of approximately $146,000. Including the 2001-02 allocation, the total amount available to the City Council for use is approximately $183,000. Of this, only $5,000 can be used for "public service" projects. The City Council should receive public input and provide direction to the City Staff regarding potential projects to be developed by the City and submitted to the County in December. The City Council will formally decide on the prioritization of projects and funding levels on January 25, 2001. 2001-02 Proiects: As the City Council is aware, Staff is currently investigating possible rehabilitation opportunities for the Richard Rollins/Terrace Hills Park. This would involve a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Noe CPP� 2001-02 CDBG PROJECTS SUBMITTALS AGENDA REPORT- December 14, 2000 Page 2 of 2 significant upgrading of facilities, including a re-grading and re-build of the parking lot to meet ADA requirements. As it currently exists, the slope ratio of the parking lot is approximately 7:1 and ADA requires a maximum 2:1. Staff has consulted with the County ECD staff regarding the possibility of utilizing the CDBG reserve for the reconstruction of the parking lot. They have given a preliminary concurrence to the use, which would exceed $150,000. Staff is recommending that the City submit as a project priority, the reconstruction of the parking lot for ADA compliance purposes at $150,000. The net effect would be to exhaust the existing unallocated account, which is the preference of HUD which is stressing use of all funds as allocated in each program year. RECOMAMNDATION: That the City Council receive public input on CDBG Projects for the City of Grand Terrace; and Provide input to Staff on suggestions for City projects for the 2001-02 Fiscal Year. FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action. cl T y 0 Community and Economic Development Department ............ ....................... . ........ X ............... ......................... . .......... ................. ................ ................ ... . ................................ .. ........ X.. ................ ......... ..................... ........... ........................X ........... .... ....... xx ......... . ......... .................*'*"''*......... .................... ....* ............ ....... .. .................... ....... ..*......... . . ............*...... . ................... ......................*...*'**'**'*'**.......... .. . ............ X.............. ... ....................... ............**..... ....*.....***'***....... .......... .. . ....... ...................... . ........ . ............ ......................... .. ..................... . . . .............. .......................................%..... .. ..................................... :.:X:............ ........................ . ...................... ................ ..................... ......... ........................ . .. ........................... ......... ......... .... ................ ....AW .......................... . . . ........ .. ............... .. .................... .. ............... . ......... .. . ............... ................. .. .................. ... ............... ....... ........... ... ........... .... X _X :,*::::*;........................ .... .................... ......... ...... . ..... ......... ..... ............................ ............ ............. ...................... ......................................... ............................. ......................._. ........................... . ......................... ...... ................................... . . . .. ............ ............ .......... ........................ .............. ........................................ ......... .............. ................. ................. ... ..................... ...................... . ....... .................... .............................. ..... ........... .... ...X..:.*,:...... X, -X . ............. ............. .. ..................... ................... . ...... ... CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM(X) MEETING DATE: December 14,2000 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X SUBJECT: Public Hearing to modify Specific Plan No.92-01 to expand an existing telecommunication facility located on the top of Blue Mountain including the addition of a 110 foot high tower,second equipment building and ground mounted satellite dishes. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Second Reading of the Proposed Ordinance Approving SP-92- 01AI(Specific Plan Amendment for American Tower)and ApproveE- 99-07(Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration) Background: This matter was heard by the City Council at its meeting of November 9,2000. Following the public hearing the City Council unanimously approved the request to modify Specific Plan No.9201 and adopted the first reading of the Proposed Ordinance Approving SP-92-OlAl to allow the construction of a 110 foot high telecommunication tower and equipment building at the top of Blue Mountain. This application was made on behalf of the American Tower Corporation. Recommendation: The staff recommends that the City Council adopt the second reading of the Proposed Ordinance Approving SP-92-01AI and Approve the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,E-99-07. Respectfully submitted, JohnUAampe Patrizia Materassi Planner Community and Economic Development Director PM:JL-jl Attachment Ordinance Approving SP-92-0 1A I(Specific Plan amendment for American Tower)and E-99- 07(Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration)and Exhibit"A"-The Amended Specific Plan Text Attachment 2 Mitigated Negative Declaration c:\MyFiles\JOHN\AmericanTowerlsp9201A I counciLrptsecondreading 22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92311-529 WW'k-A&NDA ITUR N_6.7� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING SP-92-01 Al (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT FOR AMERICAN TOWER)AND E-99-07 (PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION) WHEREAS,the applicant, JSM Associates on the behalf of the property owner American Tower has applied for approval of SP-92-OIAI and E-99-07 (Exhibit A and B) to be located at 15000 Honeyhill Road on the top of Blue Mountain in the RH (Hillside Residential District); and WHEREAS, the amended Specific Plan (SP-92-OlAl), set out in full in Exhibit A is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code of the City; and WHEREAS, a specific plan is required in the RH (Hillside Residential District) for a telecommunication facility at this location; and WHEREAS, the amendment to the original specific plan will allow for a use that is compatible with the nature of the top of Blue Mountain which has a history of being used for telecommunication facilities; and WHEREAS,in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Mitigated Negative Declaration(Exhibit B)has been prepared for this project and this Mitigated Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on October 19, 2000; and WHEREAS,the City of Grand Terrace's Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Ordinance, previously approved on May 22,1997 will regulate all further development and void the proliferation of towers on the top of Blue Mountain. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission following the public hearing on October 19, 2000 recommended that the City Council approve the amended Specific Plan(SP-92-01 Al)and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration (E-99-07), set out in full in the attached Exhibits A and B, be approved and adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on for SP-92-OlAl and E-92=09; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposed Amended Specific Plan(SP-92-OlAl)set out in full in Exhibits A is approved and adopted by the City Council. ATTACHMENT 1 i U J , Section 2: The Mitigated Negative Declaration on file in the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace (E-99-07) is hereby approved as Exhibit B. Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31"day of its adoption. Section 4: Posting: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places with fifteen (15) days of its adoption, as designated for such purpose by the City Council. Section 5. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 9th day of November, 2000 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 14' of December, 2000. ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace Terrace and of the City Council and of the City Council thereof f I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as to form: John Harper, City Attorney 1 , BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Table of Contents A. Project Description B. Text and Diagram 1. Uses Description 2. Description on public utilities including access, sewer, water, drainage,waste disposal, energy, etc. 3. Development Standards a) Setbacks b) Height a.through o. 4. Phasing Plan 5. Diagram, see Exhibit A. 6. Applicant's Description of Project. C. Relationship with the General Plan D. Environmental Review E. Planning Commission Report and Ordinance Exhibit A BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC.PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 AI/CUP-99-071E-99-07 ' Page I A. Project Description W 1er-s are + A +_ xx• '+ tl + -eneemeff+l. The f 1•+ 11 fiet b visible �r rx antenna,flet-d"w lest. There will be no r-e eetive ' ') buildings and .! x e buildings will be eenstnaeted with bir-eh eeler-ed eener-ete bleek masep.-)-, beige metal flasing faeia and b6ige 1 r-ed steet rib feefing. Class A fire ,-acing material, an steel a Fur-theEmer-e,-the -equipment inside is--enelesed in metal bexcs and eentain ne vvmva------ Only ld em the no The mier-ewave tower-is make of , » legs with of minimum galvanized metal and laeeing is the ,-F g + xmxctxxxc and rczzriu.v The - - 3/4 $A Z— +" �. ' terW and-are-18" a 15' in height, e nr-elleetiye grzry—flat fipAsh.Thewill be 8 feet in diameten At bui—eut, 4 to 5 dishes may be installed an Owen A4 this time, the *11 installed en top of and sides ef the!75' teiver. The lishes range in size ftem 6- white to 30' 19gh. They er-gr-ay-blue in 1 Please r-ef + A++ l + A t 1 (APPLICANT TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, PLUS OTHERS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: • Rental of Space • Maximum-number of tenants • Keys of chain link gate • "Wattage of electrical connections • Potential for radiation from antennae • Potential for frequency interference • Description of fire prevention apparatus plus the City requirement for drywall ceiling for one hour fire retardant effect.) BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 Al/CUP-99-071E-99=07 Page 2 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of an unmanned communications tower facility on the top of Blue Mountain in the City of Grand Terrace. Workers are expected to visit the site once every month. The facility will not be visible from Grand Terrace, except from the very southeast portion of the city in proximity with the orange grove, area. The tower and respective antennae will blend in with other existing towers to the northwest. There will be no reflective antenna, nor antenna painted with colors that do not to match the natural background of the mountain. Currently, the facility consists of one (8' X 75') tower, which provides support for four (4' diameter) microwave dish antennae; three omni-directional antennae; three (3' diameter) satellite dish antennae; and one (8' diameter) dish antenna located at the base of the tower. The facility also includes one monopole, which will be removed and its (10' diameter)microwave dish antenna will be relocated to the roof of the existing (12' X 40') equipment shelter that currently supports another (10' diameter) dish. An interior chain link fence surrounds the entire facility. And entrance into the facility is through an existing 14' gate located at or near the eastern property line. The proposals to the existing facility include the addition of a (4-legged, 110') lattice tower designed to support antennae for various agencies from federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The'antennae, which are subject to each carrier's design and specifications, will be positioned throughout the tower and may include, but will not be limited to, one (3' diameter) microwave dish antenna located toward the top of the tower; 25-30 omni- directional antennae; 16 panel antennae; 12 microwave dish antennae ranging in size from 6', 4' and 3' in diameter; four (3' diameter) satellite antennae; and one or two (10' diameter) dish antenna located at the base of the tower. A(18' X 40') equipment building will also be constructed within the facility, which may support two (10' diameter) dish antennae on its roof. Two to four(12' diameter) land based satellite dishes may placed on (10' X 10') concrete pads. And one (5' X 10') emergency generator pad will also be constructed within the facility. The equipment buildings will be constructed with birch colored concrete block masonry, beige metal flashing facia, beige colored steel rib roofing, steel hollow metal doors, and Class A fire rating material. This construction material prevents fire from entering into the buildings. Furthermore, the equipment located inside the building is enclosed in metal casings,which contain no combustible material. The construction of the support tower is made up of 4" legs with 2"minimum galvanized metal and lacing. The tower provides the support for the,transmitting and receiving antennae described above. The antennae contain a non-reflective finish and are placed on the tower subject to each agency's individual' requirements which are customarily installed at the top and to the sides of the tower. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN J Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01-A1/CUP-99-071E=99-07 Page 3 B. TEXT AND DIAGRAMS 1. USE DESCRIPTION The permitted uses will be—fer consist of two equipment buildings and two antennae towers as identified in Exhibits 1 &2 in the Specific Plan. If any further development is desired, the Specific Plan will have to be amended. Pursuant to Section 18 71 020 of the Grand Terrace Zoning Code the permitted land use is described as "communication towers antennas and necessary appurtenances." 2. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES The proposed project will only requires the basic infrastructure services such as access, fire protection, electrical, and telephone. Access Road The access road will is off of a public right of way known as Palm Avenue, and onto a private road known as Hone Hill Road, which extends from the said property proposed site onto Honey Hill Drive and Palm Avenue. The applicant can submit proof of prescriptive access rights or easement. Public Utilities There ample—eleetrieal-se� available to provideseFv;ee to faeilitate the 1111 proposed pfejeet J Southem r1r3 a Edison, Electrical service to the facility currently exists and is provided by Southern California Edison. Ample and sufficient power is available to supply the existingfacility acility and the proposed project. There is f,:st,ing ta`lrna� utility .,1, ady :labla "Yll"11 10.V1V near- the site.The sen4Ee--will—be pr6yid2d by Paeifie Telephone span. Service to the-facility currently exists and is provided by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. There will b no need for- water- mr rtiosewer- tie purposes as the site will be unmanned and rr1Y uo�u„se.lfor e8easional mainterianee en equipment.. Except for occasional equipment maintenance by service technicians the proposed project is unmanned and does not require a supply of water for consumption, sewer or irrigation purposes. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 Al/CUP-99-071E-99-07 Page 4 2. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES (Continuted) Emergency Service As required—ley The San Bernardino County Fire Warden's Department re uires that the private access road to the facility be maintained and cleared fEff so that emergency vehicles to seend in ease of nz can reach the facility in the event of a fire or other emer eg ncy. The water- for- a fire situation ;1, be Y:e:iced by the tracks as the teiTain is too Fugg•1 to eenneet water-lines from Palm A-veiiue Y + +1, ,,inside and„rr su would be .1iffie 1+ Due to the rugged terrain that exists alongthe he slope of the hillside, and the high water pressure that would be necessary to reach the site from water lines connected at Palm Avenue large self contained fire trucks will provide the water supply that would be used to extinguish any fire within the facility. Special fire retardant materials are being will be used in the construction of the equipment buildings, such as Class A Fire Roofing. Drainage Due to ne or > minimal grading, r � existingef existing vegetatien this prejeet will. :H-At -;Ater.- aRy drainage rei Existing drainage routes will not be altered by this project and no landscaping or removal of existing vegetation is required because verb minimal or no grading will be done. A topo/soil test and grading plan will be submitted to City Engineer if neede�. Waste Disposal ''-rites will b no need for- waste disposal to 1 ^ site�Qa +1, buildings ^�,1 b unmanned �e •+y f+1, +im other- +1•.^,. 11 those _ that require maintenanee by scr�'rc-c--_P�^�Jviul.l, ill will talc a trash er- wasted ^ a .;;.,it +1,^,„ .1.,w the 1,i11 Waste disposal services are not necessary because the site and the buildings will be unmanned for a majority of the time. During the occasional maintenance visits by service technicians, all trash and/ or waste created by the technician will be disposed of outside of the facility by the personnel that visited the site. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 A11CUP-99-071E-99-07 Page 5 3. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a. ZONE: RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. This allows very low-density single family residential development - with a maximum retention of open space. A Specific Plan is required for any type of residential development.in this portion of the City, which is identified in the General Plan's Master Environmental Analysis as having severe developmental limitations such as topography and soil conditions. b. LAND USE: LDR, LOW DENISITY RESIDENTIAL C. LOT AREA: 20-aeres 0.46 acre: 100' x 200' d. SITE AREA: .01 aer-e ^�_6' 0.15 acre e. OPEN SPACE: 1°�-aer-es 0.31 acre f. WIDTH: meet 100 ft. g. LOT DEPTH: 1-04' feet 200 ft. h. LOT COVERAGE: 10' let eeve,-age 10% lot coverage i. STREET FRONTAGE: 0 ft. (private access road) j. DISTANCE BETWEEN BLDG: 14'feet 10 feet. +/-) k. PAKING: 1 space '� twe (2` 1' feethighbci ic`�riiib 1. HEIGHT: 75�fec��te�� Proposed second tower, 110 ft. lattice tower; one (1) additional 11 ft. high equipment building. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 Al/CUP-99-071E-99-07 Page 6 3. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued) M. SETBACKS: 5' feet. n. COLOR: The proposed tower and antennae contain a non- reflective finish that avoids glare. The color of the tower is usually steel gray' and the antennae are usually pearl colored or off-white. However, the final color is to be approved by the Director of Community and Economic Development. o. SCREENING& . LANDSCAPING: The site is an existing telecommunication facility. The additional tower and equipment building are of the same kind and nature of the structures that already exist within the site. The topography of the site area and the existing facility prevents this applicant from providing a feasible landscape plan _ that provides a high level of screening. However, any boulders that are removed or relocated from the site will be use for screening_purposes. 4. PHASING PLAN Phase Oiie vvill eensist of the eenstfuetin of BuildinR One, tower-install e-lear-an t, t to t tr t a telei)heiie b,i; tilit- ser-vioes and ,d it-,and fire review, if ai3vr-ei3�ate, for-this i3has as seen as feasibly possible ; eem.,timn o„it-h the Gr-qiid Terrarge AA,,,,; .1 ,1 1 ent s d ds established b-i this Eifi'e—Plan. Phase T A) „11 eensist of the eeristmetion of Building Two in the same fashion vvithin 6-menths to Vive year-s Phase One has been completed and construction of Phase Two is being proposed. Phase Two will consist of the construction of one 110 ft. lattice tower with various sized antenna mounted throughout the tower, and additional land based antennae situated on concrete pads. An equipment building is also beingpr6posed as part of Phase Two, which may also have antennae mounted on its roof. Phase Two is in compliance with the development standards set forth in this Specific Plan and with the City of Grand Terrace Zoning Code. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01-A1/CUP-99-071E-99-07 Page 7 5. DIAGRAM Diagram plans consist of site plan, elevations, and vicinity map for this Specific Plan. Please refer to Exhibit"A" 6. APPLICANT'S DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The applicant has described this project in detail. Please refer to "A. Project Description" above. C. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The Blue Mountain Specific Plan introduces a new use to this residential hillside area which is compatible with the General Plan. The hillside area is intended for very low density residential development with maximum preservation of natural terrain. The Blue Mountain Specific Plan proposes a microwave tower facility which will only occupy 04 .015 acre out of a 20 .05 acre property. The other 0.31 acres will be retained as open space. The Specific Plan is an implementation tool of the General Plan and is therefore consistent with the goals of the General Plan. The Blue Mountain Specific Plan is also consistent with the General Plan Goal for Aesthetic Cultural and Recreational Resources Element which is "Enrichment of the Community by optimizing the availability and usefulness of the City's Aesthetic Cultural and Recreational Resources. " The Blue Mountain Specific Plan incorporates the policy of the General Plan by utilizing a hillside area that is intended for very low density residential development with maximum preservation of natural terrain. A telecommunication facility already exists in the proposed area and because of its high elevation Blue Mountain is an ideal location to expand wireless service throughout the City. The amended Specific Plan optimizes and preserves the City's aesthetic resources while providing a service that enriches the entire community. Therefore, by implementing the amended Specific Plan the policy and goals of the General Plan are preserved and promoted. BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN Blue Mountain Specific Plan American Tower Corporation SP-92-01 Al/CUP-99-071E-99-07 Page 8 D. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Enclosed is an Initial Environmental Study, Diseussien en Initial et„4'., Notice of Filing Negative Declaration, and Negative Declaration, t A ttae1,,,,e„t 3. please refer to "Attachment 1" of SP-92-OlAl &E-99-07. E. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AND ORDINANCE Enclosed is the Planning Department staff report to the Planning Commission, meeting of November- 'cr1Trrn2 to A++ 1, t n and asseeiated nr^11 anee. October 19, 2000. Please refer to SP-92-01A1 CUP 99-02, SA-99-07 &E-99-07 with associated attachments. Attachements: (1) Pietur-es Staff report to P/C meeting of 10.19.00 (2) Letter-fry ^ppliea".ant (5) Final Genditions of Approval (6) Additional hifermation BLUE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN t i\ 1 c1Tr . 0 GRAND TER R CE Community and Economic Development NEGATIVE DECLARATION Department I Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: S.P.-92-01-Al; CUP-99-02; S.A.-99-07; and E:99-07; Application to Modify Specifice Plan No.92-01 and related applications to expand an existing telecommunications facility located on Blue Mountain including the addition of a 110 foot high tower, equipment building and other equipment including 10 foot diameter satellite dishes. APPLICANT: JSM Associates (Property Owner--American Tower) LOCATION: 15000 Honeyhill Road, the top of Blue Mountain FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: Based on the attached Initial Study with mitigating measures, there is no substantial evidence that the' project will have a significant impact on the environment. Patrizia Materassi Date Community and Economic Development Director City of Grand Terrace PM:JL:1 a\MyFiles\Infrastructure\sp9201A1.nd ATTACHMENT 2 22795 Barton Road o Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 e (909) 824-6621 City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: S.P:92-01Al,CUP-99-02,S.A.-99-07 and E:99-07--Modify Specific Plan No.92-01 and related applications to expand an existing telecommunications facility located on Blue Mountain including the addition of a 110 foot high tower, equipment building and other equipment including 10 foot diameter satellite dishes. - 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,'CA 92313 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director: (909)430-2247 4. Project Location: 15000 Honeyhill Road,on top of Blue Mountain 5. Project Sponsor's Name JSM Associates 6. General Plan Designation: OS(Open Space-Hillside Overlay) 7. Zoning: RH(Hillside Residential District) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved,including but not limited to later phases of the project,and any secondary,support,or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The proposed project consists of an unmanned communications tower facility atop Blue Mountain. Workers are expected to visit the site once every month. The facility will not be visible from Grand Terrace,except from the very southeast portion of the City in proximity with the orange grove area. The tower and respective antennae will blend in with other existing towers to the northwest of the site. There will be no reflective antenna,nor antenna painted with colors that do not match the natural background of the mountain. Currently,the facility consists of one(8'X 75')tower,one(18'X 40')equipment shelter,and two(12' diameter) concrete pads. An interior chain link fence surrounds the facility. The entrance into the facility is through an existing 14' gate located at or near the eastern property line. The proposals to modify the existing facility include the addition of a 4 legged,110'high lattice type tower, which is designed to support antennae for various agencies from federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The antennae,which are subject to each carriers's design and specifications,will be positioned throughout the tower and may include,but will not be limited to,one,3' dish antenna toward the top of the tower;25-30 omni-directional antennae; 16 panel antennae; 12 microwave dish antennae ranging in size from 3',4'and 6'in diameter; and four,3' satellite antennae. One 12'X 40'equipment building will also be constructed within the facility,which may support additional dish antennae on its roof,including two,10' satellite dishes. A TX 10'emergency generator pad will also be constructed. Community and Economic Development Department 1 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis The equipment buildings will be constructed with birch colored concrete block masonry,beige metal flashing facia,beige colored steel rib roofing,steel hollow metal doors,and Class A fire rating material. This construction material prevents fire from entering into the buildings. Furthermore,the equipment located inside the building is enclosed in metal casings,which contain no combustible material. The construction of the support tower is made up of 4" legs with 2" minimum galvanized metal and lacing. The tower provides the support for the transmitting and receiving antennae described above. The antennae contain a non-reflective finish and are place on the tower subject to each agency's individual requirements,which are customarily installed at the top and to the sides of the tower. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) l North: Additional communication facilities and vacant land East: Vacant land South: Vacant land West: Vacant land and at about%mile or more residential 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, flnancing approval, or participation agreement) Federal Communications Commission,Federal Aviation Commission J Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Services Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water ❑Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑Air Quality ❑Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation(To be completed by the Lead Agency): ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and fan ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been Community and Economic Development Department 2 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Date Patrizia Materassi Community and Economic Development Director. Printed Name Title Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potential Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potential Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is required. 4) "Potential Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potential Significant Impact" to a"Less than Community and Economic Development Department 3 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis 1 Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from, Section XVH, `Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). References to ;a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. i Community and Economic Development Department 4 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially 'Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact. Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. Land Use and Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ (Source: General Plan Categories Map; Zoning District Map) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (There are no known agencies where the proposed infrastructure improvements would cause a conflict. ) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be incompatible with existing;land use in the vicinity? (Zoning District Map, City Zoning Code) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (There are no significant agricultural resources in the study area) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ❑ ❑ ❑ established community(including a low-income or minority community)? (No specific development is proposed by the infrastructure study. ) A brief explanation to answer I: The top of Blue Mountain is currently used for multiple communication facilities with two additional towers approved under SP-96-01but not constructed. The existing facilities on the subject site were approved under Specific Plan 92-01 which allowed for the use for communications facilities. The proposed use is located in an area which is developed to communication facilities;therefore,the proposed use will be compatible with the existing development in the area. The remainder of the area consists of the undeveloped,vacant land on Blue Mountain. The recently adopted Open Space Element of the General Plan, adopted by the City Council on January 131h,2000,contains no policies or prohibitions against communication facilities on the top of Blue Mountain. Lastly,there are no agricultural resources or operations on the top of Blue Mountain to be adversely impacted;nor is there an established community on the top of Blue Mountain to be physical impacted by this project. II. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area ❑ ❑ ❑ In or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? O ❑ ❑ 1W Community and Economic Development Department .5 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than, No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated A brief explanation to answer II: The proposed project is non-residential in nature;does not involve the extension of major infrastructure in the area; and will not displace existing housing as no housing existing on the top of Blue Mountain. III Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (Geotechnical Investigation 7/27/99) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking?(Geotech. 7/27/99) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?. ❑ ❑ ❑ (Geotechnical Investigation 7/27/99) d) Seiches, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (GP NEA/EIR ❑ ❑ ❑ H-1) e) Landslides or mudflows? (GP MEA/EIR H-1) ❑ ❑ _; f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (Geotechnical Investigation 7/27/99) g) Subsidence of the land? (GP M EA/EIR II-1, Append ❑ ❑ ❑ B) h) Expansive soil? (GP MEA/EIR H-1, Append B-4) ❑ ❑ ❑ I) Unique geologic or physical features? (Geophysical ❑ ❑ ❑ Investigation 7/27/99) A brief explanation to answer III: A geotechnical investigation of the proposed site was prepared by HDR Engineering,last year(7/27/99). The geotechnical investigation did not identify any faults on the subject site or even in close proximity to the site. Therefore fault rupture is n expected to pose a geologic problem for this project. Also a detailed seismicity discussion was included in the geotechnical investigation. The report concluded that the project can be designed to be resistive to seismic ground shaking through appropriate design requirements. The geotechnical report further states that the potential for liquefaction is considered to bi nil due to the absence of shallow groundwater and underlying bedrock. The report did not identify any other geologic problems for this project such as landslides or subsidence. A grading and drainage plan will be required to be submitted to and approved by the City'to minimize erosion or unstable soil conditions from the grading operations to constrict this project. Lastly,the geotechnical report did identify several large granite rocks on the site. A condition is proposed that will require that all rock outcroppings be identified on the required grading plan and that such rock outcroppings be relocated to nearby location on the mountain to be approved by the Community and Economic Development Department. Community and Economic Development Department 6 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated IV. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the ❑ ❑ rate and amount of surface runoff? (GP MEA/EIR II-1 Append B) b) Expose to people or property to water related hazards ❑ ❑ ❑ ,such as flooding? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ surface water quality(e.g.,temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water ❑ ❑ ❑ body? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ ❑ ❑ movements? () f) Changes in the quality of'ground waters, either through ❑ ❑ ❑ direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception _ of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (GP MEA/EIR H-1) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-1) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (GP MEA/EIR H-1, ❑ ❑ ❑ and 97 Regional WCA Report) I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑. ❑ ❑ otherwise available for public water supplies? (GP MEA/EIR H-1) A brief explanation to answer IV: Although this project is minimal in size,it will add to the cumulative impacts with respect to drainage problems that have resulted from earlier projects on Blue Mountain including the access road. These impacts will be mitigated by requiring a grading and drainage plan demonstrating amongst other things that the drainage of the constructed site has been properly designed. The applicant will also be required to submit a drainage study_and erosion control plan;provide a maintenace schedule for the access road from Palm Avenue;and repair or install down drains on the access road to preclude erosion and provivde a method of erosion control. Community and Economic Development Department 7 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated V. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an Lk ❑ ❑ ■ existing or projected air quality violation? (GP N EA/EIR II-14, and AQMP) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (The Element ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ contains an implementing action to reduce such exposure) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ any change in climate? (Any such implementing actions are designed to have a positive effect on the region's air quality) d) Create objectionable odors? (No specific odor causing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ proposals are included in the Element) A brief explanation to answer V: Because of the relative small size of the site and its relative"unmanned"nature,little or no air pollution will be generated b, this facility. An emergency generator will be stored on the site in case of a failure in electrical power. The generator motor must comply with applicable air pollution standards for internal combustion engines and will only be used on an infrequent basis. Lastly,no objectionable odors will be generated by this proposal. i - I Community and Economic Development Department 8 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VI. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result a) Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ r` (Trans. Engineering and Planning Consultant) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., P ❑ ❑ sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ❑ ❑ ❑ nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ❑ ❑ ❑ bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (TCM Ordinance 147) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts?() ❑ ❑ ❑ Brief explanation to answer VI: The proposed project will not result in substantial additional traffic or a demand for parking or other forms o! transportation because it is essentially an unmanned facility. The unpaved access road to the site from the base of Bluc Mountain off of Palm Avenue will have to be repaired and maintained to the City's satisfaction. This will eliminate or greatly reduce any hazards to safety. Community and Economic Development Department 9 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VH. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20, Append C) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage ❑ ❑ ■ ■ trees)? (GP MEA/EIR H-20) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ❑ ❑ ■ oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (GP MEA/EIR II-20) d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh, riparian, and ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ vernal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (GP MEA/EIR H-20) tJ Brief explanation to answer VII: The proposed project is located on the top of Blue Mountain which is known to have important biological resources. Proposed construction of the site will only minimally disturb these resources;however,all areas altered by grading and. not occupied by a new structure shall be replanted with native plants including any"borrow"areas. (The geotechnical study stipulates that material will have to be"borrowed"from adjacent areas for fill material.) A report by a qualified botanist to be approved by the City shall be submitted making specific recommendations as to what plants should be included in any replanting of this area. Said report to be submitted and approved by the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the issuance of any grading permits for this project. i i I I Community and Economic Development Department 10 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer VIII: No mineral resources have been identified in the City and therefore do not occur in the project area. IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑ �. release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (GP MEA/EIR II-7) b) Possible interference with ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?(GT Emergency Plan, and GP MEA/EIR II-13) c) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ ❑ ❑ potential health hazard? (GP MEA/EIR II-1) d) Exposure of people to existing ❑ ❑ ❑ sources of potential health hazards? (GP MEA/EIR-II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ ❑ flammable brush, grass, or trees? (GP MEA/EIR II-6) Brief explanation to answer IX: No hazardous substances will exist on site;therefore,there is no risk of explosion or hazardous materials being released during an accident or upset condition. This is an unmanned facility,no evacuation plan will be required. Community and Economic Development Department 11 Initial Study and Environmental . Analysis I Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact -Mitigation Incorporated IX. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ release of hazardous substance (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (GP M EA/EIR II-7) b) Possible interference with emergency ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (GT Emergency . Plan, and GP MEA/EIR II-13) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ MEA/EIR II-1) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■' (GP MEA/EIR II-1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ (GP M EA/EIR II-6) Brief explanation to answer IX: No hazardous substances will exist on site;therefore,there is no risk of explosion or hazardous materials being released during an accident or upset condition. This is an unmanned facility,no evacuation plan will be required. X.Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ ■ (GP MEA/EIR II-10) b) Exposure of people to severe noise ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ levels? (GP MEA/EIR II-10) Community and Economic Development Department 12 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XII. Utilities and Services Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-32, II-33) b) Communications systems? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-33) c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑ ❑ U distribution facilities? (GP MEA/EIR II-30) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ V1 MEA/EIR II-30) e) Storm water drainage? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ N MEA/EIR II-33) f) Solid waste disposal? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-32) g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ N (GP MEA/EIR II-30) Brief explanation of answer XII. Electricity and phone lines exist at the subject site;no new utility services will be required as a result of the proposed project. XIII. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ highway? (GP MEA/EIR II-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ W1 ❑ aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ Community and Economic Development Department 13 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues (and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impact t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated MR. Utilities and Services.Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (GP ❑ j ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-32, R-33) b) Communications systems? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ MEA/EIR II-33) • , 0 Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑ ❑ distribution facilities? (GP MEA/EIR H-30) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ - MEA/EIR II-3 0) e) Storm water drainage? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ -- :_ MEA/EIR II-33) f) Solid waste disposal? (GP ❑ ❑ ❑ -- MEA/EIR 11-32) g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ (GP MEA/EIR II-3 0) Brief explanation of answer XII. Electricity and phone lines exist at the subject site;no new utility services will be required as a result of the proposed project. XM. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ . ■ ❑ highway? (GP MEA/EIR II-22) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ Community and Economic Development Department 14 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer XV. The topography of the area is too steep for all recreational activities with the possible exception of hiking. This proposal will not impact any existing or planned hiking trail or adversely impact any other recreational activities. Community and Economic Development Department 15 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answer XV. The topography of the area is too steep for all recreational activities with the possible exception of hiking. This proposal will not'impact any existing or planned hiking trail or adversely impact any other recreational activities. XVI. Mandatory findings of significance. a) Does the project have the potential ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant or animal, eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,to the ❑ ❑ ■ disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed iri connection with the effects of past projects, the-effects of other current projects, and the effects of other probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ either directly or indirectly?y Community and Economic Development Department 16 'Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact Unless Impact' Mitigation Incorporated Brief explanation to answers XVI. The project does have the potential to cumulatively impact drainage and erosion patterns and problems in the area, especially the erosion on the westerly face of Blue Mountain if not adequately mitigated by the requirements discussed in this analysis. Regarding potential cumulative impacts on aesthetics,any cumulative impacts related to proliferation of towers on the top of Blue Mountain will be mitigated by a condition that any new tower within the American Tower owership would have to comply with the 800 foot separation requirement of the Wireless Telecommunication Faciliti... Ordinance. Therefore,the potential cumulative impacts of this project will be less than significant because of the mitigation measures incorporated into the project. XVII. Earlier Analysis. Earlier analysis may be used where,pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR, or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Used the Grand Terrace General Plan Master Environmental Assessment aj EIR for most of the base impact information. Both documents are available.at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. H Not Applicable c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measured which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. Not Applicable Community and Economic Development Department 17 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis Issues(and Support Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less than No Significan Significant Significant impac t Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Authority:Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. References:Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c),21080.1,21080.3,21082.1,21083,21083.3,21093,21094,21151;Sunstrom V. County of Mendocino,202 Cal.App.3d 296(1988);Leonoff v.Monterey Board of Supervisors,22 Cal.App3d 1337(1990) c:\MyFiles\AmericanTower\sp920lAl.is Community and Economic Development Department 18 Initial Study and Environmental Analysis RESOLUTION No. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 7,2000, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Grand Terrace, California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities;.and WHEREAS,pursuant to Resolution No.2000-12 adopted June 22,2000,the County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as"Exhibit A." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the whole number of votes cast in the precincts except absent voter , ballots and provisional ballots was 3,399. That the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in the City was 914, the whole number of provisional ballots-cast in the City was 34, making a total of 4,347 votes cast in the city. Section 2. That the names of the persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: Maryetta Ferre Lee Ann Garcia Norman K. Simpson Brian E. Whitley Don Larkin Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes . given in the City to each of the persons named above for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates were as listed in Exhibit "A" attached. Section 4. The City Council does declare and determine that Maryetta Ferre, Lee Ann Garcia and Don Larkin were each elected as Member of the City Council for the full; .term of four years. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO 18A i , Section 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of votes cast in the City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) For what office each person was voted for; (4) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person; (5) The total number of votes given to each.person. Section 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated;that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14`h day of December, 2000. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 14th day of December, 2000, by the - following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk Approved as,to form: City Attorney "EXHIBIT A" CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) I, INGRID E. GONZALES, Registrar of Voters, County of San Bernardino, State of California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 15300 et seq. of the California Elections Code, I did canvass,the returns of the votes cast for each elective office in the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE at the Presidential General Election held on November 7,2000. I, FURTHER CERTIFY that the Statement of Votes Cast, to which this 1 certificate is attached, shows the total number of ballots cast in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for each candidate in said City in each of the respective precincts therein, and that the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for each candidate are full,true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official seal this 27th day of November 2000. INGRID E. GONZAIES Registrar of Voters OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST AT THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION CITY OF GRAVD TERRACE - MEMBER CITY COUNCIL (3) Page Numcer 324.141.001 R T T M M M L M N M B M D E u u E A E E E 0 E R E 0 G R R M R M E M R M I M N I N N B Y B B M B A B S 0 0 E E E A E A E N E L T u U R T R N R N R R A E T T N E R R C A C C K C C K E P I I G I I N I I D E T F T A T S T H T N R Y E Y R Y I Y I Y V C R C M T 0 E C R C I C P C L C T N 0 E 0 A 0 S 0 E 0 E T u u u 0 u Y u R A N N N N N N S G C C C C C E I I I I I L L L L 443 335-1.2.11 888 474 53.3% 178 226 192 81 147 1 335-3,5,6 890 557 62.5% 333 281 151 157 246 4:2 335-4.14 744 415 55.7% 213 215 129 149 175 443 335-7,12 1064 563 53.3% 252 278 201 130 261 335-3 718 429 59.6t 254 223 113 132 207 445 335-3 866 533 61.5% 269 251 188 144 200 446 335.1C 718 424 59.0% 207 224 139 113 168 :4) A3SZ:-EE ST O'C 0 89 0.0% 39 48 28 19 38 441 A3S1:E£ BT C7) 0 165 0.01 103 91 50 33 80 „2 A3SZN7--E BT 0-0 0 i67 0.0% 79 105 5i 42 84 443 A3S1:EE BT 070 0 140 0.0 77 79 41 30 81 444 ABSE.N:E£ BT 073 0 142 0.01 89 82 39 31 67 ::5 ABS_%.EE BT 070 0 105 0.01 59 53 33 29 50 445 ABSE—%:EE BT 070 0 106 0.01 57 49 53 31 51 C83 NPP BT 71 50 34 68.0% 14 18 11 5 16 •••• T 0 T A L S •••• 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1671 SUMMARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST AT THE NOVE�MER 7, 2000 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION CITY OF GRAND TERRACE • MEMBER CITY COLNCIL (3) Page Number 325'.1041.00 R T T M M M L M N M B M D E U U E A E E E 0 E R E 0 G R R M R M E M R M I M N I N N B Y B B M B A B S 0 0 E E E A E A E N E L T U U R T R N R N R R A E T T T N E R R C A C C K C C K E P I I G I I W I I D E T F T A T S T H T N R Y E Y R Y I Y I Y V C R C M T 0 E C R C I C P C L C T N 0 E 0 A 0 S 0 E 0 E T U U U 0 U Y U R A N N N N N N S G C C C C C E I I I I I L L L L L TOTAL 5938 4347 73.2t 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 C-NORESSIC`Al DIST 40 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CONGRESS_TO`:AL D:ST 41 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CCNGRESS:_`AL D:S7 42 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 CHECK =.A.L 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 :424 1130 1871 SENATORIAL DIST 17 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 SENATORIAL DIST 31 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 SENATORIAL DIST 32 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 CHECK TOTAL, 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 ASSEMBLY DIST 34 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 ASSEMBLY DIST 61 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 4SSEMBLY DIST 62 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 .^ASSEMBLY DIST 63 0 0 O.Ot 0 0 0 0 0 ASSEMBLY DIST 65 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CHECK T0-AL 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 SUPERVISOR:A:L DIST 1 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 SUPERVISOR:AL DIST 2 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 SUPERVISOR:A:, DIST 3 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 SUPERVISORIAL DIST 4 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 SUPERVISORIAL D'ST 5 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CHECK TOTAL 5938 4347 73.21 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 CITY BR;AK:Cw?I FOLLOWS APPLE VA:.*_aY 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 ^1 O 3A.RS�:w 0 0 0.0t 0 0 0 0 0 BIG BEAR L?r_ 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CHINO 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 CHINO HILLS 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 COLT"CI4 0 0 O.Ot 0 O 0 0 0 FON:'A:lA 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 GRANT TERRACE 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 3SPERIA 0 0 O.Ot 0 0 0 0 0 H:GHLA.1D 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 LCMA LINDA 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 MONTCLAIR 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 NEEDLES 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 Sun-IARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST AT THE NOVEKBER 7, 2000 PRESIDENNTIAL GENERAL ELECTION C::Y OF GRAND TERRACE - MEMBER CITY COUNCIL (3) Page Nurbe: 326.1041.00 R T T M M M L M N M B M D E u u E A E E E 0 E R E 0 G R R M R M E M R M I M N I N N B Y B B M B A B S 0 0 E E E A E A E N E L T u u R T R N R N R R A E T T T N E R R C A C C K C C K E P I I G I I W I I D E T F T A T S T H T N R Y E Y R Y I Y I Y V C R C M T 0 E C R C I C P C L C T N 0 E 0 A 0 S 0 E 0 E T u u u 0 u Y u R A N N N N N N S G C C C C C E I I I I I L L L L L ONTARIO 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 RANCHO C':CAMONGA 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 REDLANDS 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 RIALTO 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 SAN BERNA O:NO 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 TWESTYN:\: ?ALMS 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 UPLAND 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 VICTCRVIL:.E 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 YUCA:PA 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 YUCCA VALLEY 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 UNINCORPORATED AREAS 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 CHECK TOTAL 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 POLLING PLACE VOTE 5868 3399 57.7% 1706 1698 1118 906 1404 ABSENTEE VOTE 0 914 0.0% 503 507 295 219 451 NPP VOTE 50 34 68.0% 14 18 11 5 16 COUNTY-WISE VOTE 5938 4347 73.2% 2223 2223 1424 1130 1871 STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: December 14, 2000 SUBJECT: REVIEW AND ASSIGN REPRESENTATIVES/ALTERNATES TO VARIOUS GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS Each election year it is necessary to review and make appointments to various government organizations. Below is a list of the organizations with the current representatives. Omnitrans Representative: Herman Hilkey Alternate: Dan Buchanan SCAG Representative: Lee Ann Garcia Alternate: Tom Schwab San Bernardino Valley Water Representative: Dan.Buchanan District Advisory Committee Alternate: Don Larkin ` League of California Cities Representative: Lee Ann Garcia Inland Empire Division Alternate: Dan Buchanan City Selection Committee Representative: Byron Matteson SANBAG Representative: Dan Buchanan Alternate: Lee Ann Garcia Solid Waste Task Force Representative: Herman Hilkey Alternate: Tom Schwab Omnitrans Tec. Advisory Representative: John Donlevy Alternate: Tom Schwab California Joint Powers Representative: Don Larkin Insurance Authority (Board Alternate: Tom Schwab of Directors) Alternate: John Donlevy j San Bernardino County Gang Representative: Don Larkin &Drug Task Force Partnership Strategy Review Representative: Herman Hilkey Committee COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. STAFF REPORT CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE: December 14, 2000 SUBJECT: SET DATE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION DEADLINE TO FILL VACANCY CREATED BY THE ELECTION OF MARYETTA FERRE TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND SCHEDULE A MEETING DATE TO CONDUCT INTERVIEWS The Election of Maryetta Ferre to the City Council has created a vacancy on the Planning Commission. The term is scheduled to expire June 30, 2002. Staff Recommends Council: 1. Authorize the City Clerk to post the vacancy and accept applications to fill the unexpired term. Cr 2. Set a deadline for Planning Commission Applications. 3. Schedule a meeting date to conduct interviews. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.