Loading...
1994-02 RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP-94-01 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION, E-94-06, TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE; AND APPROVING ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS SA-94-03 AND LL-94-02 WHEREAS, the applicant (Southeastern California Association of Seventh Day Adventists - Azure Hills Church) has applied for approval of a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for approval of environmental review and associated Negative Declaration for associated cases, SP-94-01, SA-94-03 and LL-94-02 (Attachment B); and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting approval of SP-94-01 (Barton Road Specific Plan Amendment) to change the zoning of Lot 2 from Village Commercial Subarea to Administrative Professional Subarea to blend with the zoning of the existing site (Attachment F); and WHEREAS, the applicant is in the escrow process with the owner of the adjacent property to the southwest, Zampese/De Benedet Partnership (Attachment F); and WHEREAS,the applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment for the merger of the two lots into one; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on May 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 94-02 recommends approval of SP-94-01 and Negative Declaration(E-94-06)to the City Council; and approves associated cases (Site and Architectural SA-94-03 and Lot Line Adjustment LL-94-02); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 5, 1994 approved Resolution No. 94-02 recommending approval to the City Council of SP-94-01 and E- 94-06, and approving SA-94-03 and LL-94-02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, State of California, that the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. — 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. —}. 3. That the design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. That the design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration. 5. That the provisions for the design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and the Barton Road Specific Plan. 6. That the proposed project, its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand -Terrace, California, that E-94-06 (Attachment B) is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed project shall be constructed in accordance with the Site and Architectural Review Board on May 5, 1994. Minor changes and/or clarification may r—A be made by the Planning Department. The design, materials and color shall match the existing main church building and associated school buildings with prior approval from the Planning Department. 2. The applicant shall pull appropriate building permits, Oversized/Heavy Load permits for removing portable classrooms and demolition permits. The portable classrooms will be removed at time of issuance of occupancy permits for the new school building or prior to the deadline for the Administrative Site and Architectural Review on the portable classrooms whichever comes first. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall apply for a minor deviation of up-to 2 feet for 20 foot lighting standards in the Barton Road Specific Plan, Administrative Professional Subarea if the lighting standards exceed' 18 feet. 4. In accordance with the Barton Road Specific Plan, the use of textures, colors and materials on the building shall be consistent with that of the other existing buildings to avoid dissimilar massing and proportions. 5. The applicant shall submit a detailed fencing plan indicating existing and proposed fencing. Submit a block wall profile to indicate a slumpstone wall as approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board. Placement of fencing to be along the west and south portions of the overall site. A slumpstone block wall shall be continued from the west property line to the building. Slumpstone block wall shall be 6' on the west and south sides of Parcel 2, with the exception of the section adjacent to the school yard play area on the south side, which shall be 8' high. The exact location shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Prior to building permit, applicant shall submit a response plan to show mitigation measures to be 'implemented in case of noise-related complaints. Examples of measures are double- glazing and relocation of playground/lunch area associated with educational building. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, detailed lighting plans shall indicated location, size and quantity of lighting standards. 7. Detailed landscaping and.irrigation plans shall be submitted showing conformance with Barton Road Landscape Plan and site landscaping improvements indicating types, quantities, gallons and colors especially in buffered landscaped areas adjacent to residential properties. Advise landscaper not to work- on the weekends and maintain compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 8. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall pay appropriate traffic impact fees to the City. Bus service is suggested to help alleviate traffic on Barton Road in the future. 9. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be located at a distance from the edge of the building so as not to be visible from the pedestrian level or from adjacent roadways. 10. Any new signage for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department or • Planning Commission for review and approval. 11. All recommendations listed in the City Engineer's memorandum to the City (Attachment G). 12. All recommendations listed in the Fire Warden's Office memorandum to the City (Attachment H). 13. All recommendations verbally communicated by Riverside Highland Water Department to the City. These verbal communications reiterated the Fire Warden's memorandum to the City. 14. The Seventh Day Adventist Schools and Church shall strictly comply with the Grand Terrace Municipal Noise Ordinance especially with respect to the removal of existing facilities and construction of the new school building. 15. All aspects of the proposed project including building maintenance shall be maintained in a clean and functional manner to the satisfaction of the Planning Department in accordance with this approval and the overall goals and objectives of the City of Grand Terrace. 16. School to submit solid waste plans related to any near future recycling efforts to the Y Planning Department at time of building permit for information purposes and for the record. 17. In case the hours of operation and activities vary significantly from what is stated in the summary report, the applicant shall come back to staff for further analysis regarding traffic, parking and noise. 18. During construction phase, chain link fencing shall be constructed around the job site to prevent exposure of hazards to students and public. 19. Lot Line Adjustment application shall be submitted to the City Planning Department by May 26, 1994, 1st reading of the project ordinance by City Council. 20. The finalization of the Lot Line Adjustment shall be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 21. Submittal of Fire approved sprinkler plans to the City Planning Department for building permits. 22. Address for the educational center will be on Center City Court, for fire protection. 23. Recommendation that the church and school facilities respond to property owners previous complaints and agreed solutions: a. Installation of shields on the tennis court or parking lighting or similar • mitigation. b. Maintain open channel of communication with surrounding property owners and acknowledgment of installation of block wall during building permit phase. 24. Submittal of parking plans to indicate location of handicap parking spaces, bicycle racks, quantity, design or parking layout,in accordance with Off-Street Parking Code of the Barton Road Specific Plan and to coordinate and facilitate appropriate mitigations to effectively reduce already overcrowded parking conditions. 25. Any expansion of use, intensity increase or change of use will need further review by . Planning/Building and Engineering Departments or public hearing before the Planning Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission.of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of May, 1994. AYES: 6 - Chairman Sims, Vice-Chairman Wilson, Commissioners Garcia, Huss, Munson and Van Gelder NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 - Commissioner Addington Jim Sims, iairman Planning Commission r, ATTEST: . Brenda Stanfill v City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM . John Harper U City Attorney �I'T y Planning TERR C NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION Department Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will nod have a significant effect on the environment.due to mitigation measures included in the project and described in the Initial Study project. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be incorporated in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The merger of the one vacant lot with the existing church facility site into one parcel is reviewed through the Lot Line Adjustment process. APPLICANT: - Azure Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church - Project Representatives - Jack Booker and Jerry Cole LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA ****************************************************************************** Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,CA (909-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to May 15, 1994. All comments should be directed'to the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace. Joann Lombardo Date Interim Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace _ c:\wp51\plannmg\sp\sp9401.nnd 22795 Barton Road•Grand Terrace,California 92324-5295•(909)824-6621 B GAT/ • o Planning rERR c Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that -said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94706 and LL-94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be.incorporated in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The merger of the-one vacant lot with the existing church facility site into one parcel is reviewed through the Lot Line Adjustment process. APPLICANT: r , Azure Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church Project Representatives - Jack Booker and Jerry Cole LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Joann Lombardo Date Interim Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace c:\wp51\planning\sp\sp9401.nd ' 22795 Barton Road•Grand Terrace,California 92324-5295•(909)824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY I. Background t 1. Name of Proponent: Citv of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Citv of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road. Grand Terrace. CA 92324-5295 Attention: Patrizia Materassi. Planning Director. '714-824-6621 3. Date of Environmental Assessment: 4. Agency Requiring Assessment:...City of_Grand-Terrace 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable r HaUt= OU iL W.41 ADDT,W _. 6. Location of Proposal:�2,,9./,,. R/[�-/-a&f H. Environmentallmnacts (Explanations of all 'yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Mav_be No L Earth. Will proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in.changes in geologic substructures? _ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of this soil? C. Substantial change in topography _ or ground surface relief features? r 1 d. The destruction, covering or Yes Ma_vbe No modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any substantial increase in wind t or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure,-or similar hazards? . 2.. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 2 Yes Mav_ be No b. Substantial changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Alterations to the course or r flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or---- rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground - waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? 3 Yes Mav_ be No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of r plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals als including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms-or. insects)? ------- -- ----- - - - --- b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? - C. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife-habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x, 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or - - planned land use of an area? 4 Yes Mav_ be No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? A- r b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:. a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference-with an emergency.response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? - - - - - - 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12... Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing _ transportation systems? Yes Mavbe No d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? �N f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _N b. Police protection? C. 'Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance'of public facilities, including roads? N f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources.of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result-in a need for new systems, or-substantial alterations to the following utilities: r � 6 Yes Mavbe No a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? Y C. Water? t d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? Y f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -- - b. Exposure of people to potential hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal.result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. . Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a.prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Yes Mavbe No b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? �( r C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses. within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the. -potential-to-degrade the quality of the environment, substantially_ reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or Yes Mav_ be No more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) t d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on'the environment, and a NEGATIVE.DECLARATION will.be-prepared. _ I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Planning Director "„_� _ Date Signature For Citv of Grand Terrace III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PROJECT NAME: Azure Hills Elementary School PROJECT APPLICANT: AIA/Southeastern Conference Association of 7th Day Adventist (Azure Hills Church) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SP-94-01, SA-94-03, E-94-06 and LL-94-02, an application for a 6,976 sq. ft. educational center within an existing church and school site. This project is located in the Barton Road Specific Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. The project includes acquiring one adjacent parcel to the west, APN 277-161-31, in the Barton Road Specific Plan Village Commercial Subarea and changing it to be incorporated in the Barton Road Specific-'Plan Administrative Professional Subarea. -The--____ merger of the one vacant .lot with the existing church facility site-Into one-parcel is--reviewed-through the; ,ot Line Adjustment process. - PROJECT LOCATION: 22633 Barton Road _-� Grand Terrace 1. a, b Earth. Will proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions, disruptions, displacements, compactions of soil, change in topography or destruction to physical features? Yes, the construction and placement of the elementary school; parking lot, picnic areas and playgrounds will result in changes to the soil and physical features..,However,this is mitigated through the Planning and Building review process by the City Engineer's requirement for a formal grading plan, preliminary soils report for the proposed construction area, and proof of adequate drainage facilities as part of the conditions of approval for the project prior to occupancy. 1. c, d, e, f and g " Earth. Will proposal result in: Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, changes to river or stream, or expose people or property to geological hazards? No, there will be no substantial change to topography or ground surface relief features or increase in wind or water erosion of soils, or exposure of people or property to geological hazards as the City Engineer will cornldition to control proper drainage and adequate grading. 2. a, b, c Air. Will the proposal result in: Substantial air emissions or deterioration of air quality, creation of objectionable odors or alteration of air movement or change in climate? No, the proposed project will not result in substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality as the school is a closed facility and any equipment as air conditioning/heating units, cooking equipment will be regulated by standard UBC-code and San-Bernardino.County Public.Health Services to prevent any deterioration of air quality. Compliance with these regulations are part of the conditions.:of-approval for.this project. - - 3. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i Water. Will the proposal result in: Substantial changes in currents, or the course of water movements, change in absorption or drainage patterns, change in surface water, discharge into surface waters,alteration of rate of flow of ground waters,reduction in public water supplies or exposure of water related hazards to the public? No, the proposed project will not significantly alter any water movements nor expose the public to water related hazards or reduce water supplies. The City Engineer is requiring adequate drainage facilities as part of the conditions for approval. 4. a Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity or reduction of species, or introduce new species of plants? Yes, the existing site is already developed with landscaping and irrigation.The proposed project will require additional plant life, landscaping and irrigation. The project is conditioned to submit formal landscaping, and irrigation plans for building permit processing. 4. b, c, d No, the proposal will not result in reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation or barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. r 5. a, b, c Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of animal species or reduction of numbers or rare/endangered species or deterioration to wildlife habitat? No, the site does not contain any animal species. 6. a, b Noise. Will the proposal result in: Increases in existing noise levels or-expose people to severe noise-levels? - Maybe, the proposed project will add some increase in noise levels or expose people to moderate noise levels while the children are playing outside during recesses or during lunch breaks. Staff has determined that the dba levels that may exist from the current proposal to the completion of maximum student enrollment will not have a significant effect as the noise exposure can be mitigated by barriers conditioned for this project such as a 6-8 foot high wall near the open areas next to the property lines of the residential areas. equipment to be in conformance with the General Plan. The project has been conditioned that the applicant must meet the maximum 55 dba noise level adjacent to residential properties. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? No, the proposal will produce new lighting however it will not be substantial or significant as the parking lot lighting to consist of energy efficient high pressure sodium fixtures 20" poles and directed away from residential properties. Building lighting will utilize soffit lighting at all entrances and glazed areas for security. All exterior lighting shall be controlled by time clocks and photo cells. The landscaping and irrigation will utilize drought tolerant plants and drip irrigation for shrubs and trees. All exterior lighting shall be directed gway from residential.properties as conditioned for, this project. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Yes, the proposed use is an acceptable-use within the Barton Road Specific Plan AP Subarea, but part of the school building and associated parking is proposed on an adjacent piece of property which is in the BRS Village Commercial Subarea. A Specific Plan Amendment and Lot Line Adjustment are necessary to join the parcel to the west to the main site of the existing church and school, making one continuous parcel,and to obtain proper zoning and landuse of the BRSP-AP Subarea and office professional uses allowing for a private school. The project applicant has submitted the appropriate land use applications; and a.lot line adjustment will be required to be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Substantial increase in the use of natural resources or depletion of same? No, the proposed use will not alter or substantially increase the use of natural - resources or deplete the resources as this tenant use does not require additional usage of natural resources-lore than what already exists. 10. Risk. of Upset. Will the proposal involve: _- A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . No, the proposed project, a school, will not involve the risk of exposure to hazardous substances as the project is for a closed facility that does not handle hazardous substances and is conditioned to be in compliance with local, County, State and Federal regulations. . 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? No, the proposed project will have no impact on the location, distribution, density and growth rate of the human population as .it will not affect population density of the area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? No, the proposed project will have no impact upon the existing housing and shall not result in creating a demand for additional housing as it does not r"� involve growth factors, density and similar issues. r 13. a, b, d Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parldng facilities or demand for new parldng? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? r Maybe, there will be no substantial vehicular traffic generated by the proposed project as it will only moderately increase business activity to the site, which is below City threshold for traffic studies. However, project is subject to pay for a traffic impact fee as it is developed. This will not trigger a TIA report nor separate traffic study in accordance with the Congestion Management Plan adopted by the City. Additionally, parking of the existing church facility has been noted by the community to spill over into adjacent. on-street and commercial parking facilities during the Saturday service. As part of this project, the applicant is providing additional parking which will alleviate Saturday spill over problems. 13. c, e, f _ Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result:in: Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? No, there will be no substantial impact upon existing transportation systems or alterations to air,,rail or waterborne traffic. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have a substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in.any of the following areas: Fire Protection? No,since the Fire Department would be the first response team to a potential hazard at the existing building, it is not anticipated that increase of fire protection services would result from the proposed project. Emergency fire access will be provided to the site as part of this project. Police Protection? No, the proposed project will have no effect upon or result in.the need for new or altered police protection services as the type of project proposed does - not require it. Schools? No, the proposed project will not have substantial effect upon, or result in a need in new or altered governmental services the project is for a private school facility and not School District governmental services. Parks or other recreational facilities? r - No, the proposed project will not have substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered parks or recreation facilities as the type of project does not require any expansion of site improvements. These facilities are provided within the project. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Maybe; however, the project is conditioned to have the applicant responsible for paying Capital Impact Fee to help pay for street improvements as needed. Other governmental services?- No, there are- no impacts to.-other._governnrental agencies anticipated as a.. - result of the proposed project. 1 _ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? No, the proposed project will not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or,energy as there will be no major physical improvements to the specific site area. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? No, the proposed project will not result in the substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy as it shall operate within the building facility's existing levels of energy. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications_systems? Water? Sewer or septic _ tanks, storm water drainage, solid waste and disposal? No, there will be no need for new systems or substantial alterations to°the utilities by the proposed project as there is sufficient water availability for usage and sewer on the existing site to include the expansion,of the school. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of people to potential hazards? No, the project does.not require any collection of significant hazardous waste or,exposure of people to potential hazards as it is a school facility and does not require any handling of such materials. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or. will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? No, there will be no obstruction of any scenic view open to the public, however, there may be the creation of view of additional building structure from the surrounding residential properties however it is conditioned to blend in design, materials and similar colors to match all buildings so as not to be aesthetically offensive. The site currently contains building structures which are seen from some of the surrounding residential properties. _.-- _. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon- the. quality .or quantity ofexisting"recreational'opportunities? No, the proposed project will not create any impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities as it provides its own. 20. a, b Cultural Resources: Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historical archaeological site? Will the proposal.result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? No, there will be no significant archaeological, prehistoric or historic destruction or adverse physical/aesthetic effects as there are not prehistoric or historic buildings or objects on the site. 21..c, d Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique, ethnic cultural values or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? No, there are no unique ethnic cultural values anticipated to be affected nor any known religious or sacred uses to be impacted as this proposed use is within an existing building that has no restriction or impact on the potential impact area. 21. a, b, c, d Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California history or pre-history? r No, the proposed project will not impact the environment or reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species or eliminate major periods of California history or pre-history as this is not an expansion of physical development and the internal operations of the business are controlled by State and Federal regulations to insure a high grade of environmental quality, and there are no fish or game existing on the site. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? No,the proposed project,with its implementation of individual environmental programs from local, State and Federal regulatory-agencies-will-zchieve-short- _ term as well as long-term goals without significantly _impacting the_ environment. C. Does -the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Maybe, cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project can be in relation to the additional traffic flow however, are addressed by traffic mitigation measures as the traffic impact fee. d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?- No, it'is not anticipated that the proposed project will create adverse effects on human beings since the project. is regulated under safely controlled conditions in accordance with County, State and Federal:environmental and public health guidelines. Southeastern Caiifomia As Of Seventh-day Adventists 11330 Pierce Street.P.O.Box 8050 Alverside;CA 92515,(7-M)359-5800 909 t . April 6, 1994 Letter of Intent: This is to state that the Southeastern California Association of Seventh-day Adventists is initiating an escrow to purchase land known as Parcel 5, of Parcel Map No. ' 6462, in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 77 of Parcel Maps, pages 55 and 56, records of said county, being a subdivision of a portion of Lots 9 and .10, Hermosa Rancho, as---per plat recorded in Book 13 . of Maps,' -.,page 29, records of said County. SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS - BUYER Rogeid W. Heinrich - Vice President 41 Date ZAMPESE & DE BENEDET, A PARTNERSHIP - SELLER � axe Cis; s i6 /wlZ ) • v Dates II __ ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO2o9 �1��titi��111\\1ti11111\11ti1ti tititilltititi11titi1tititititititititiltititi`1\ti\\��ti`1titi`1titiltitititi\�tiltitilti\\ti\\\ti\titi\ti\ti\�y State of California CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of Riverside ❑ INDIVIDUAL(S) ; 1 IS CORPORATE i On APB �� 1994 before me, R°xie C. Pouell OFFICER(S) 1/.ce- Plllye,�t 1 1 DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,-JANE DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC' TITLE(S) l ❑ PARTNER(S) 1personally appeared W. HFinrlch ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT j NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ TRUSTEE(S) i EL personally known to.me-:OR.--.p.proved.tome.on:the basis of satisfactory.evidence:-_: -U-SUgscRIBwG wITNEss to be the 45erso s) whose am (s)0are _ subscribed to the within instrument-and-ac-- ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR j knowled ed to me tha g iQshe/they executed- -❑-OTwER: ,. ,�.o•.r the same in 4 'her/their authorized J OF - OFFICIAL SEAL <:aj aclt (les), and that by (�ii 'her/their `` ROXIE C POWELI > signature s)on the instrument th erso s), Y :.�,• ;J, NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ) , RIVERSIOECOUNTY or the entity upon behalf of which th so er s) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: v '.(,FORK My Comm.Expires June 2av1994) acted, executed the instrument. NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) v v v v V v v v Y , Witness my hand and official seal. l SOUTHEASTERN CAUFORNIA ASSOCIATION _ ��a�►ff�T1#�AY7lDYENTIJiS � P.O.BOX 8050 J SIGNATURE OF NOTARY If J ATTENTION NOTARY:Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL,it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to unauthorized document. f J THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document Letter of Authorization — Azure Hills 1 iMUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages One Date of Document 6, 1994 f J TO THE DOCUMENT i DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above f J 7111titi1ti ti---- ` --------- O 1991 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.•P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park CA 91304-7184 d Mary 4�. Southeastem California Association Of Seventh-day Adventists r ' 11330 Pierce Street.P.O.Box 8050 ANerside;fA 9£515,(71-4)359-5800 9oq r - April 6, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: As legal owner of certain real property identified as Parcel 5, of Parcel Map No. 6462, in the City" -of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California,..as_ per "plat..recorded in Book 77. of. .. Parcel Maps, pages 55 and "56,- records of said county, being a subdivision of a portion of Lots 9 and 10, Hermosa Rancho, as per , plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, page 29, records of said County, we hereby authorize the signatures of Jack. Booker and/or Bernie Gibbs to act as our agent in behalf of the signing of documents pertaining to building permits and development of this property. "SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS Roger `W. Heinrich = Vice President Date ' PF_ .?JPcC; I SUMMAF. ,AZURE HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ABANDONED FACILITIES The two swimming pools have been demolished and removed. The present use of these locations are landscaped areas for the day care center and church. According to the utility plan (enclosed), the septic system were to be removed. 4- GRADING CONCEPT . u P DATE!J Vb M M ENTS FD L-1-O0 The new sch o1 buildin proposed to be located in t vicini of the existing tennis co and t approximately the same el ion. new access lane connecting the two ifferent parking areas shal dra' westerly with a maximum slope 4°I and a minimum slope of 12% near building. Site drainage around t e building will be a . minimum of 12% . the concrete paved areas of the lu rea draining westerly and the re lane on the east draining northerly o e access drive.The drainage at th rema der of the building area sh pproximately 1%. Drainage in the arkin of will be 2.5%sloping westerly then 1%sloping northerly to n w catc basin which will tie into the existing storm drain near the rear entrance of the fire station. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Parking lot lighting to consist of high pressure sodium fixtures on 20' poles and directed away from residential property. Building lighting will utilize soffit lighting at all entrances.and glazed areas for security.Again,.lighting will._. ... .: be directed away from residential property.:---. V-1EATING AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT All exterior equipment is to be located in equipment wells at the upper roof levels. These wells will have an open beam cover to visually blend them into the rest of the roof.The air handling units are located in attic spaces and the roof dormers. • SIGNAGE - UPDATED COM M ENTS -F01_1_0 Uj �•l. uu11 N.�LLC.bu W�.uri..S i.� AcCEs-sIBI�RY - Uf' ca�Mt<nJrs Fo�Lou) ACTIVITY SCHEDULES Church Services Saturday. 8:15 am., 11:15 a.m. Sabbath School Saturday 9:30 am. Bible Study Wednesday 9:15 am.,7:00 p.m. Pathfinders Tuesday 6:30 p.m. Elementary School Classes Monday-Thursday 8:00 am. 230 p.m. Attachment c Friday 8:00 am.-12:00 noon . Before School Care Monday-Friday 6:45 am. 8:00 am. After School Care Monday-Thursday 230 am.-6:00 p.m. Friday 1200 p.m:4:00 p.m. 219I93 REG'01 FEB 0 91993 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 1992-1993 school year 84 students 1993-1994 projected 97-104 students his school is being designed for a maximum of 200 students due to limited outdoor recreational areas of the site. his limit is not anticipated for at least 5 years after the new building is completed. AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM The after school program provides supervised play and study time for students that cannot go home after schooL This will take place in the multipurpose room and in the playground areas of the site.All pick up of students shall be done through the school office area for control and,safety.of the children. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM The Multipurpose room will provide assembly space for the students during inclement weather, inside lunch space, and special presentations for the school family. The use of the basketball court will be limited to public use based. upon availability,given church and school priorities first. SCHOOL BUS PROGRAM The school.does not utilize any type of bus transportation. Presently all students are dropped of by their parents. Over the past few years only one student used the public transportation system which has a bus stop approximately 200 feet from this site. It is not anticipated to operate a-private bus system for the students by the school or conference. Planning Department Policy to Evaluate Schools Size: /s the site size scienl for(aJ presentandfuture but/dings, (b)p/aying orsporrs fie/ds, (cJ bike racks and(dJ bus load'17 The school is presently sharing classroom space with the church's sabbath school classes within the existing building.This creates conflicts on Fridays and Mondays when the school classroom materials have to be taken down and the sabbath school classroom materials are put up and visa versa on Mondays.A number of years ago the State of California published guidelines for space criteria in new schools.This criteria was used to determine the maximum size for the proposed school building and playing areas.See attached cafc sheets for further information.The present school does not utilize any bus services and does not anticipate any need in the future. Location: /s the site of the schoo/closo to homes ofthe students Who attend the schoo/and/s eas//y access/b/e to the students Who W//lattendnot Within c/aseproximily ofthe C/ly? The present school and church are located on a major city street with easy access from the . surrounding community.The majority of students that attend the school are members of the church community, approximately 12%are non members of the church. W//the schoo/have an adbeise OffO&on lhesurmund/ngneighboifioodP9/ues? The present school does not have an.adverse_eff-M oajhe_surrounding..neighborhood values........... IS the sc1700/s/1e withintaach ofcityor./oca/govern.ment_:cOm9W171'Ifaci/itiessuc17.as(aJ,/ibrai} (b)pars (cJ . tacreat/ona/fac//MOS, etc. - The proposed facility is within walking distance of the public library,city hall, and city park. Safety; Sound and Air Quality: Is the site near any high noise areas arvolving(6J freeways, (b) aircraft (cJ far/roads,eta orisittrearanyhaz?,rdousateassuch as(aJ dsm4(b)high voltage lines,eta Pleaseaddmss/respond. The present site is located approximately one mile from the nearest freeway and railroad facilities. There are no hazardous areas in the vicinity of the school.This site is approximately 1/2 mile from a public school site. Accessibility: Do you believe that carreat aaxss and dispersal roads available prnvide the best possfNe solution for the school.FDoynu suffestaaymit/gadon measures? By providing the connecting loop between the existing two driveways is the best possible solution for_ not only movement of people,vehicles but also emergency vehicles. Utilities: Are uti/it 4 gas, elerctricity, water;seater/ices, storm drainage lirres.sat?fbent to handle current needs - +7dhrtrrreexpansionsoftheschoolandotherfacili, es? All utilities are located on site and of adequate size to handle this expansion. t Contours: Does the topographypro...e drainage ;FAhouf the need for erosion c,_ _-rol and sulllclent near level areas forbuildings,soorts6eldsWdygrounds to avoid erosion? Yes,the site is presently used for structures and playgrounds.The new construction will not create any -iew need for erosion control. Traffic Circulation: Is the cdrruladon szAl-a=4 on a7dAvm the sits, to safelyhandle the vehicle. pedestrians (children scow to schoolandemergency vehicles?(A dtrvlation pattern must beset to handle cvhicl&on site, ap to the dro)7-ofrandpick-up areas of the schoolanderitfrom thesita) The proposed circulation separates the ingress and egress from the school.The proposed circulation provides improved access to the school but also to the church buildings and day care. Development:Does the sitemasterplaa includes layout fora)allphysicaleducation facilifies,?wd(h)conceptual mastersile landscape andimgation plan? - Yes Size and Shape: Are the size and shape ofall classrooms determined by the number of occupants and the activities Which wasyourmethodology _ —.. .: :.. ...... ....-.-_...... The design of the classrooms and school layout were determined from the Seventh Day Adventist `.mference guidelines as wells as the local administration input. Exp c n d a b i 11 ty: Does the design allow for potential increased enrollfnen4 additions and changes in function? \ Whatare the long-rangeplaasoftheschooP This is the culmination of the Church's long-range plans for the school.Should the need arise for further expansion another school site would be opened up by surrounding churches and conference. -Outside Air: Plesse.describe the ventilation system for the school Can the windows be opened or are theyfired glass?Does the ventilation system addrrss the issue ofnatural exchange ofair.? The ventilation system proposed will allow for natural ventilation.The high windows in each classroom will be operable to allow natural ventilation while the lower windows will be fixed for security reasons.The systems will meet the current energy requirement of Title 24,The state energy standards for non residential buildings. - Appropriateness_ Design charvcleris&-, of the school are appropriate to the com...sniy and region where the schoolislocated.- aJ Are nataVe matetrals used rylien feasible to match otrgina/bui/dings? The existing structures are board and batt sided single story structures built in the early 1950's.The _actuary built in 1975, utilizes redwood siding,stone veneer,and concrete the roofing.The proposed building shall incorporate the colors of the wood siding,and the roofing. Because of costs,the masonry building will be built with split face blocks in the brown and red tones. b) /sthescale ofbui7Mngc»mpattbletosunrwr7dOngI&sidenlia/atrafitilerhite? r The structure is predominately a single story structure with roof variations to blend in with the residential neighborhood.The structure floor level is approximately four to five feet below surrounding sites. 0) Does lheplvposedlandscaoing complement the existing Orenhance the surrounding ne/ghbofioodZ Yes,the new landscaping shall enhance the textures and colors of the neighboring properties. d.J W1ndoKsshou/dbeCm9L0d0ron opposite e%vationstoreducenegativeitnpacts on surrounding residentia/properties Due to the variation in site levels between the school properties and locations of the windows under the eaves the impact on the residential properties is minimal. Natural Attributes: Are gmunds adjacent to-halld/ngs landscaped, and-the-sire. development-for physica1 education,recreation and parkingcnmplete? { Yes. Humanism: Is the site plan orpj7l"to creates rradety ofoutdoorspaa-•and eavirvnments which augment the educational facillty.-� Yes. Synthesis: Is ii c lighigng directed on-site and not extend onto adjacent residential prvperties7 When feasOle, enemy-responsive elemenlsshou/d be mtegratedmto the total design,id solar,drip irrigation,eta Please addrow All parking lot lighting to consist of energy,efficient high pressure sodium fixtures on 20' poles and directed away from residential property. Building lighting will utilize soffit lighting at all entrances and glazed areas for security.Again, lighting will be directed.away from residential property.All exterior lighting shall be controlled by time clocks and photo cells.The landscaping and irrigation will utilize drought tolerant plants and drip irrigation for shrubs and trees. r Character_ Is the architaclzrral solution orderly,p/easan!and appropriate to contewpomfy educe lion -a physical environmen!!o satisfy emot/onalneeds andstimulale spirilua/and intellectua/gmwt/r Yes. Safetp: .4te farnitutr ertetior egaipment and playipmiatas designed to prevent stimmmlfailoro or btrakage and to redace thepawbllityofaaddentalatjatyto llie aser7 t - Yes.The existing equipment is designed for school use. Land for Parking and Access Roads: Parking for small schools is arranged so these schools use a combined parkmg ales and buss loading area. In this macep4 minimum tegaired for this arrangement is about.3 acres,plus 280s.f for each Sato stall.Howdoesyoarprojectcompare with tfiispolicy.? Because this school us a church school the parking is shared by all.The layout allows for safe drop-off and pick-up of students during the week and allows safe access to.the church facilities on the weekend. r Cole&Frick Architects,A.I.A. .4195 Chestnut Street • Riverside, California 92501 • 714/684-4011 GRADING CONCEPT t The new school building is proposed to be located on property adjacent to the existing fire station and at approximately the same elevation. The new access lane connecting the two different parking areas shall drain westerly with a maximum slope of 4% and a minimum slope of 1/2% near the building. Site drainage around the building will be a minimum of 1/2% in the concrete paved areas of the lunch area draining westerly and the fire lane on the east draining northerly to the access drive. The drainage at the remainder of the building area shall be approximately 1%. Drainage in the parking lot will be 2.5% sloping westerly then 1% sloping northerly to new catch basin which will tie into.the existing storm drain near the rear entrance of the fire station. SIGNAGE A new monument sign on Center City Court is proposed. ACCESSIBILITY By providing a connecting loop-between-:the°existing--parkingarea,°the new parking-a m and--through onto Center°City,Court is the best possible,solution for not only movement of people, vehicles but also emergency vehicles. s - UPDAT� Cod��N�s } kz}f v{ Azure Dills Seventh-day Adventist Church- 22633 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 (909) 825-8611 t ' April 8, 1994 Planning Department City of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace, CA .92324 Gentlemen: The Azure Hills Seventh-day Adventist Church is at the present time negotiating. to purchase property near '-the- Grand Terrace Fite. Station upon which we plan to. build a school, as well as provide 100 additional new parking spaces at the back or rear of our church property adjacent to the newly purchased property. This additional parking should help alleviate the parking problems that we have been experiencing for some time. In addition to the school building and additional parking spaces, there will also be a new access _and egress road via City Center Court. We will endeavor to educate our church members to utilize the new parking spaces and the new road to improve the traffic flow on Saturday morning. We hope this information will be helpful to you as you look at the plans for future expansion here at Azure Hills. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Bernie Gibbs . Administrator D V,,1. r +'° Yl'i irkr "t r•Bal;jttFa Z�: ■' - ir r i 7 }. dM ���"•d 4 p fl a r 41 j � 21�a t 4 1'IZ is 1 i-..7 i • 1�1>;! v• t !f � _ .a°:c r . - ly: � � � ra �a -� .r t .!/I • r /! �.. { rr" �� i /..1 i j i F�•;� •�t.�i ,� � F1` i � rY a,!•Q o+}.�vQrryiR.ir'tr rt�ra,. ... .lr'..�S�{� t rv, r .t. ,r.a .,_ � ..}���1i� , +i'��ast<r+.t, r A9 ,r l - {'Nf11q�1'ti - .`,. .' •: ": � ` -• �.f �ems. ��. ,y a • i ' ;.,;,. fir' .iIL •-w,.p,1r, ' WAD .01 tit ; •�: .tit b ,:.f�`''r. 1f1f Y S • ' 1 c tar �I V� •J �••>" •1„��•, r nl.: fh'1 Y�: a14 -d u.1�•�r ai� '/!'Tips ..• r Tilt is g,t:-I ,h,Orf 1 - I I III I II I a • • - Ueit"(Mast Arm Mount) Standard High Pressure Sodium Lemp(1) Motel Halide Lamp(l) Optical Type low 100W 150W(2) 25OW '"40oW 175W 2S Design 20/30 . CS7212 CS7222 7232 1 CS7252 CS7262 CS7142 CS7152 C Design 22 CS7213 CS7223 CS7233 CS7253 CS7263 CS7143 CS7153 Oeslgtt40 CS7214 GS7224 CS7234 CS7254 CS7264 CS7144 CS7154 Design SO CS7215 CS7225 CS7235 CS7255 CS7265 CS7145 CS7155 - Internal Pipe Clamp:Mounting will accommodate 114"-2;i"O.D.horizontal tenons Bracket arms not Included wfth standard untL Direct Arm Mountings rl Aro Round �A40� CA41-3"pia.Pole x CA42-3*"-4"Ole.Pole One(racket arm must be ordered for each standard unit used. 1 Pole Tap Mounting . - . VIC � 6W - I �. -� Square Sound '. Single Double 90' Double 180• Quad 90' Single.. Double 90' Double 180° Quad 90• Triple 120°' CA43S CA44S CA45S, CA46S CA43R CA44S CA45R CA46R • \ 14-4 CS7000 Series.Order appropriate atlpHtW whlclt Includes mounting arn+(s)• _ — 'Sllp(itter acoommodates 2ii0-3"O.D.pole top tenons. 18 McGraw-Edison ' I BARTON ROAD .r COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN •Y rar µaµ •••'�•.••,'.','' � a:::: �y � :�,3�I�t•::. ::. .•t 1� I t — ak7�l•Ay Q I X.M.K.: r• IT' �( �T I I :•:q::� :.z•�''�•�' ..'fit.... I I i I t K:�•}'r:�'r:v'r:��'r � 11 ►TilFT IilI � I � IL - I �--III k� _ . E SUBAREA 1 1 SU-BAREA 2 - 1 SUBAREA 3 i h Sf�KOO EXHIBIT II SUBAREA REFERENCE MAP F BARTON ROAD" COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN ' ul A _ III lii _ :R \ :Y'• T'T • IIF7 I I F, 1 L• , l i IL H .4 ` LEGEND A GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) j _ AD MINI STRATIVE\PROFESSIONAL (AP) EXHIBIT III (3) I MASTER PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE 12-8.5226 c Ty MEMORANDUM-RAND TERM CM - t 22795 Barton Road TO: Joann Lombardo, Interim Community Development Director Grand Terrace California 92324-5295 FROM: Joseph Kicak, City Engineer Civic Center � (909)824-6621 DATE: April 12, 1994 V Fax(909)783-7629 SUBJECT: Azure Hills SDA Church- Specific Plan, etc. The proposal is to add classroom building on the parcel at the east end of Center City Court adjacent to and south of-the existing Fire Station site, and westerly of the existing SDA Byron R. Matteson Church site. Mavor )nald M.Christianson Center City Court improvements were installed as.part- the approval process of Parcel Map: . Mayor Pro Tempore No. 6462 in the early 1980's. The proposed-school building will be located on Parcel 5 of subject map. The improvements consist of the following: Gene Carlstrom `_ ` Herman Hilkey 1. Paved roadway. Jim Singley - Council Members 2. Curb, gutter and sidewalk. Thomas J. Schwab City Manager 3. Sanitary sewer lateral 6" diameter. 4. Water system service lateral- size unknown. Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, lot line adjustment should be finalized. 2. Provide hydrology study, indicating the flows tributary to the site,generated on-site and the,method of disposal. 3. Provide adequate drainage facilities. 4. Construct standard drive approach. 5. Provide grading plan for the site, indicating the proposed improvements on this site and new improvements on the adjacent site to the east. . G Joann Lombardo April 12, 1994 Page 2 6. Pay all capital improvement fund fees. r 7. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City. JK/ct FROM FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING 04.bV. I,: 0 za:nl P. 1 FORESTRY AND FIRL - .'ARDEN DEPARTMENT RDINO Fire Prownion Planning Services • County Government Center COUNTY OF BAN A 385 No. Arrowbead Avenue.Fiat Floor • San Bernardino.CA 92415-0186 OFFICE-OF PUBLLICIC SAFETY ETY (909)387.4212, 387.4213 DICK WILLIAMS. Director got EMERGENCY 6ERVICES 1 OW 387-3021 Serving the communities of; r Angelus Oaks Baker ��� 8a Mesa DATE; Mg/ / / �f Big Rh'sc Black Mosdow Landing Ra F Prison TO: {CDF)Chino_ Hills 41ty of Grend Terrace city of!\crdics f/ O Coppet Mountain Afcka Dogg,rtt Alrpurt (Mirage FROM: /I El Mirage Harvard Hei¢ndnle (COO) Hesperia RE: City of HigWnd V/� ��� /'� _- _—_.—= Hc,mesteed Volley Johnswi Velk y IoAva Ttee • (COF) Lucettw Valley NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) L;,tleCreek Menlonc Mountain View Actc s SPEC INSTRUCTIONS s Morongo Volley Mt. Baldy Oak Glen Ook Hilk Cork U Dom Parker I7em Pholen Pionwerlown Red Mountain San Antonio /� Spring galley Lake Pr&o 6 LLD a- NY�/I)r.L l� f�L Oe7 qw.;m t Valley West Colon Ve11cy Crv7l�iY C� W / r r City of Yucaipa IF YOU EXPERIENCE ANY PROBLEMS #ECEIVING THIS INFOI TIONf (CbF1 Yscce Valley PLEASE CONTACT US AT THE TELEPA wr. NUMBER -LISTED ABOVE. _ ;fnx 03/R4) _.. 8astd of Supgrvl�ars _ -- HARRY M. MA'VA IAARSKA TVROCI .. .. .. . , ..First Dlatslol BARBARA CRAM RIDRDAN . , .Thltd D1416011 Ceuniv A<lrnini^„„mliv,l O!(n.at JON (7.MWELS. .... . . . . . .Second District LARRY WALKER. . . . . . . . ._ .Fourth District JERRY EAVES . .. . . .. .. .. . . Fifth D191tict H r RVrl r1RC rmQ I C1..I lull rinllll!I1 V, V1.tJ R• l73 . r. FORESTRY AND FIRE W. .,RDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF.SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services • County Government Canter OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 385 No.Arrowhead Avenue,Itirst Floor San Bernardino,CA 92416-0166 (714)867-4212, $87.4218 DICK WILLIAMS, Director Gw iwt EMERGENCY SERVICES Scivirig the o mmuntties of: t Angelus;Oaks Rakc1 GRAND TERRACE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL saldy M��a Big Rivet Black Meadow Lending ` � Dovm f edeml Pr;r,un Date: yt1. /r (CDP) Chino Hilts ` ` I� a` �y C'Ity of Grnrld Tentacle i'��r Il/GGS �evaw- �" " City of Ncrdies be i /���i ` V 19 Fire Department Reference Number: rl Mirage MN OrRI: IlVO Fawnskin F ARbEN r lhmwtid Applicant. JJ��'2 C>fT - . ft/4GS C?i�� !�� , a !/� Hdont)hle (CDF) l-leslleria City of H:yhland Location: 0a0 _! !-lorne:mend Valley -_ --'---- -- - J011116(n)Valley • u Joahue indel ICUF) :.rams i_lndn THE FOLLOWING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRddRL'r"'Val4,y RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP t vile creels Me:uv:le A site inspection final is required to verify conditions of ap�ceft lew Acres have been met. Morongc,Valley Mt. P,aldy Oak Glen R F-1. Private road maintenance, including but not limited tookHrlls grading and snow removal, shall be provided. Written documentatiorvrkMoaN shall be submitted to the fire department having jurisdiction. Privatierket Darn f ire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with a minimum Phytan paving width of twenty (20) feet. 111onaenawrt Red Mountaln R I Antonkl Water systems designed to meet the required f ire flow of .}{. de ti{)tMnll pment shall be approved by the fire department hav Valley jurisdiction. The developer shall furnish the fire department wit t�tgg copies of the water system improvement plan for approval. water sys rV-5-°r' Valley shall be operational and approved by the fire derlmrtment prior to k"—, Yt,crtlpa framing construction 'occurring. The "required fire flow shaltJ'ao-vblk'y determined by the appropriate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide For the Determination of Fire Flow." water systems shall have minimum eight (8) inch mains, six (6.) inch risers. - Required fire flow is 1Z_1?_S"0 �,'7�Hj Tested at 4'9CP (91P197 t.�4Kir(t t.l tiN!V•rVIC'!PS - - __ HAIRY tA.lt'•AYS MARSHA 7VI40CI. (1W D106" 1-it0hi>A!v �'.I•tl D;:•: t Oita . SrC;rC t &fc4+Y 1�a.i al K ' •.r1.: l`.•.r r . RUREHT t HA119!tnr,C.,. r:::^.tti:: i.r FROM FIRE PROTECTION PLANNINP 04.09. 1990 20_!;02 P. 3 1 _ APR 2 6 1994 Page Two Fire Dept Ref. No. N BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE WARDEN R F-2A.' In areas without water serving utilities, the' fire protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing. All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow or an approved NFPA 13, 13R, or 13D fire sprinkler system. See attached private water supply requirements. R MS-IL3 THROUGH IL5. Water systems designed to meet the requ a fire flow shall be operational and approved by the fire department prior to framing construction occurring. The required fire flow .shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using, the San Bernardino County "Guide For the Determination of Required Fire Flow," In areas without water serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based on NFPA 1231 and be operational prior to framing: All NFPA 1231 systems shall be a minimum 5000 gallons with gravity flow or an approved NFPA 13, - 13R,---or 13D fire sprinkler system. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHAD-BR-COMPLETW PRIOR -TO BUILDING PERMITS BEING ISSUEDs BP 3 The San Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden Dapartm provides fire protection for the City of ©rand Terrace. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the fire department for .. verification of current fire protection development 'requirements. All new construction shall comply with the existing Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, . codes, ordinances, or standards of the fire department. BP F4. This development shall comply with Fire Safety Overlay conditions as adopted by County Development Code. This development is located in Fire Review Area BP F Prior to any framing construction occurring, all flammable. vegeta on shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished structure. FKUM r.1Kt NKUTEUTIUN FLHNfTIN1' U4,H'd. 1770 - zta=uit :, R 2 6 1t1�1 Page Three Fire Dept. Ref. t;o.,2 ­oo �r SAN INO COUNTY FIRE WARDEN BP F6. A minimum fuel modification zone is requVed to comply with county standards. BP F7 Prior to framing construction, approved fire hydrants and fire by rant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall be six (6) inch in diameter with a minimum of one four ( 4) inch and one two and a half ( 2 1/2) inch connection as specified by the fire department. The design of the fire hydrant and fire hydrant pavement marker shall be approved by the fire department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be three hundred (300) feet with the exception of single family residential which may be increased to six hundred (600) feet maximum. In areas where snow removal. occurs or non-paved roads- exist the _blue reflective hydrant marker shall be. posted on an-approved post three feet from the hydrant. BP F8. An approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more 'in lengtih. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet, except as identified in the development code and approved-by the fire chief. ( ) See attached diagram of approved turnarounds. THE FOLUNING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: 0 F9. prior to final inspection, commercial or industrial buildings sha post street address with a minimum of eight (8) inch numbers. street addresses shall be visible from the street and during the hours of darkness they shall be automatically illuminated. where building setbacks exceed- one hundred (100) feet from roadway additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed' at property access entrance. FROM FIRE FROTECT10N FLRNNINr' 04.09. 1990 20!- 33 P. 5 APPROVE_ -- 1 APR 2 6 1994 Page. Four Fire Dept. Ref. N �. , -b a COUNTY FIRE WARDLN 0 (i-PEvery chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or anyhea pliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shill be maintained with an approved spark arrester. It shall be constructed of stainless steel, copper or brass, woven galvanized wire mesh, twelve (12) gauge minimum of three-eighths (3/8) inch minimum to one-half (1/2) inch,. maximum openings, as per county Code 3381. The mesh shall be visible from the ground. No decorator caps allowed. 0 F-11 The development and each phase thereof shall have two l points; of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required by the development code. 0 F-12. Private roadways which exceed one hundred and fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the fire department having jurisdiction, .and. shall be extended.-to- within --one hundred fifty. - (150) feet of, and shall. =give- reasonable.-accessr-to all- portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building.. An access road shall be provided within-fifty. 50) feet of a_lli�building_s if the natural grade_ between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty (30) percent. Where the access road cannot be provided, a fire protection -� system shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. 0 . 13 An approved fire department lock is required on all gates. Any omatic electric security gates used, require an approved lock switch. Contact this office for lock applications. 0 F1 Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Uniform Fire o e standard #10-1. 0 Additional requirements may be applied due to the lack of suffi ent information to review. Please submit building plans and declaration of use for proper application of codes. APPROVE:�;;...-.. - , Fire Dept. Ref. to. Page SAN BERNARDINO cbuNTY tiff wAROFt'l NON—STANDARD CONDITIONS: S-vs7&, /�ivC �1� 0 a v e 9Z 04 Yet- #AS ��z �P i �Oey r�Us?- � w�T �. CaYOO e 'S of G�,u� l�p�"u-�'��'E�✓�" Po�.J' �G'� CaGC be directed to: Questions and comments may Fire Protection planning County Goverment Center, First Floor 3S5 North Arrowhead Avenue -0186. San Bernardino, California 92415 Phone (909) 3S7-4213. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely. DAVID J. DRISCOLL, Chief Cou y ire Warden pY FAX Captain , protection Planning Officer Fire c. FEES Type , Date Pd .Amount - (forms/GTcomm 4/93) ***END***