02/10/2000 �tTr .
FILE U
February 10,2000
GRAND TERR CE
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace
CAlifornia 92313-5295
P"
Civic Center
(909) -6621
Fax(909).783783-7629 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
"
Fax(909)783-2600
Byron R.Matteson CRA/CITY COUNCIL
Mayor
Dan Buchanan REGULAR MEETINGS
Mayor Pro Tern -
2ND AND 4TH Thursdays - 6:00 P.M.
- Herman Hilkey -
Lee Ann Garcia
Don Larkin
Council Members
=. Thomas J.Schwab
_ City Manager
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 10, 2000
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 P.M.
22795 Barton Road
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES.-VM. THE AMERICANS WIT13 DISABILITIES ACT OF i99Q IF
YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSLSTANCE.TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE`CALL THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE AT(909)824-d62I AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
1 1F YOU DESIRE T .ADDRESS THE CTTY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING,OTHER THAN UNDER PUBLIC
COMMENT,YOII AREASKED TO PLEASE COMPLETER REQIJ$STTO:SPEAKFORM AVAILABLE AT THE
El��'RA:YCE AND PRESENT TI'TO THE CITY CLERK SPEAKERS WILD BE CALLED UP-ON BY THE MAYOR
AT THE APPROPRIATE
:.
* Call to Order-
* Invocation-
* Pledge of Allegiance -
* Roll Call -
STAFF COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGE!IZCY
1. Approval of 01-27-2000 Minutes Approve
2. Approval of Check Register CR0003 Approve
3. Exclusive Right to Negotiate - Town Square Project (Inland Approve
Pacific Advisors)
4. Award Contract Civic Center Restoration & Waterproofmg Award
Project
5. Closed Session-Real Estate Negotiations(22381 Van Buren&
12520 Mirado).
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation-Designation of March 2000 as Daffodil Days
Month
B. Proclamation-Boy Scouts 90''Anniversary
3. CONSENT CALENDAR !!
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine I
and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff
Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the i
Consent Calendar for discussion.
A. Approve Check Register C0003 Approve
COUNCIL AGENDA
02-10-2000 PAGE 2 OF 2
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMINIENDATIONS ACTION
B. Ratify 02-10-2000 CRA Action
C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
D. Approval of 01-27-2000 Minutes Approve
E. Regional Transportation Improvement Plan(RTIP) Approve
F. Authorize Planning Commissioner Maryetta Ferre' to Authorize
Attend the Planners Institute March 1-3, 2000
4. PUBLIC COMMENT -
j
5. ORAL REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
1. Historical and Cultural Activities Committee
a. Minutes of January 3,2000 Accept
2. Crime Prevention Committee
a. Minutes of November 8, 1999 Accept
b. Resignation of Committee Member(Kiacz) Accept
B. Council Reports
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Approve
Terrace, California,Adding a New Chapter to the City of
Grand Terrace Municipal Code Establishing a Traffic
Signal Improvement Fee and a Circulation Improvement
Fee
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Reclassification of the Housing Specialist Position Approve
B. Solid Waste Self-Haul Permits. Approve
9. CLOSED SESSION-None
ADJOURN
THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD
ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24. 2000.
AGENDA rrEM REQUESTS FOR THE 02-24-2000 MEETING
MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S
OFFICE BY NOON 02-17-2000.
PENDING C R A APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING -JANUARY 27, 2000
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held
in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace,,
California, on January 27, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. .
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman
Dan Buchanan, Vice-Chairman
Herman Hilkey, Agency Member
Lee Ann Garcia, Agency Member
Don Larkin, Agency Member
Tom Schwab, Executive Director
John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Patrizia Materassi, Community.and Economic Development Director
Virgil Barham, Building & Safety Director
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Sgt. Tony Allen, Sheriff's Department
I
i
ABSENT: Lt. Pete Ortiz, Sheriff's Department
APPROVAL OF JANUARY 13, 2000 MINUTES
CRA-2000-04 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN,SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the January 13, 2000
Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes.
APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER CR0002
CRA-2000-05 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER LARKIN, SECOND BY VICE-
CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register,
CR0002.
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30. 1999
CRA-2000-06 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN,SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to accept the Audited Financial
Statements of the.Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand
Terrace for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999..
ADOPT STATEMENT OF INVESTNfENT POLICY
CRA-2000-07 MOTION BY VICE BUCHANAN,SECOND BY AGENCY,
MEMBER HILKKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt statement of Investment, .
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes
January 27, 2000
Page 2
Policy for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand
Terrace with the inclusion of the following changes:
Page 4, Section 8.0, G, in which LAIF increased the maximum agency
participation from $20 million to $30 million.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) APPORTIONMENT AGREEMENT
CRA-2000-08 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN,SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER HH.KEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Redevelopment
Agency(RDA)Apportionment Agreement with San Bernardino County and
authorize Chairman Matteson to execute said agreement.
CRA-2000-09 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY AGENCY
MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to move item 6. Land Purchase:
Pico Park to Closed Session.
Chairman Matteson temporarily adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 6:15 p.m.
Chairman Matteson reconvened the Community Redevelopment Agency at 8:45 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION - LAND PURCHASE: PICO PARK & REAL ESTATE
NEGOTIATIONS (22381 VAN BUREN & 12520 MIRADO)
Chairman Matteson announced that the Agency met in closed session to discuss Land
Purchase: Pico Park and that direction was given to staff for Negotiation.
Chairman Matteson adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:12 p.m.until
the next CRA/City Council Meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, February 10, 2000 at 6:00
p.m.
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDIL,, C R A APPROVAL
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: _ FEBRUARY 10, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: CR0003
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
CHECK NO VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
13185 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP. NOV 99 79.59
13230 CATHY PERRING CONTRACT LABOR 505.00
13231 SATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP. DECEMBER 150.36.
13232 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE FEB 00 440.50
13234 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE MHN FEBRUARY 19.10
13235 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION PHOTOS/DEVELOPING 69.13
43192 CANDEE INC. BRICKS FOR CIVIC CENTER RESTORATION 7,751.54.
43199 EL-CO CONTRACTORS UTILITY INSTALL 12520 MIRADO 12.328.55
43206 JOHN W. LAMPE CONTRACT LABOR 1-19- 1/27 561.60
43214 CATHY PERRING CONTRACT LABOR 1-19 - 2/1 455.00
43219 SO. CA EDISON COMPANY HOUSING ELECTRIC BILLS 66.82
43220 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP 1/1-2/1/00 99.04
43225 U.S. BANK TRUST N.A. 97 LEASE PAYMENT ON 97 COP BONDS 23,280.00
43227 VISIONS WEST DEMO 11891 PRESTON &22322 VAN BUREN 14,760.00
TOTAL 60,566.23
,
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE
EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE AGENCY.
m
z
a
BERNARD SIMON
2C. FINANCE DIRECTOR
z
--- - -
1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0003
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION - AMOUNT
I CERTIFY THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE AFORE LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY
LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE
OPERATION OF THE CITY.
l�
BERNARD SIMON
FINANCE DIRECTOR
3
9
OF
GRanD TERRECIA Community and Economic Development .
Department
STAFF.REPORT
CRA ITEM (X ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: NEW ERN FOR TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
This report brings to the City Council a request for approval of a new exclusive right to
negotiate (ERN) for the Town Square Project. While Lisa Hjulberg will remain as a project
manager/partner, the ERN is being requested by Inland Pacific Advisors Inc. (IPA).
IPA is a full service real estate advisory and management firm with significant experience in
brokerage and tenant representation services, asset management, property management and
leasing, financial investment services, and planning development and construction
management. -
The proposed ERN is for 90 days rather than 180 as the previous one, with a similar clause
for automatic renewal per certain circumstances for an additional 90 days. IPA believes they
will be able to ascertain project feasibility within the 90 day period and will be submitting a
cost estimate for this effort. They plan to ask for the Agency's financial assistance in this first
phase of determining the project viability. Please refer to the letter and draft ERN in
Attachment A.
Staff is in support of this request and we are looking forward to working with IPA and Ms.
Hjulberg to develop a good site plan and elevations. A schedule of performance and project
pro formas that will meet the General Plan Task Force recommendations and be feasible to
attract a movie theater tenant.
Stoutenborough Architects and Planners are being considered however no firms have beer'
named in the ERN as a team.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends City Council to move and approve the ERN with addendum of Section 3.4.6
Design Review/Discretionary Action, as submitted.
w-1 \nlmnninelPennriavltnumcrnialTnwn Sntia'a FRN 9-lmn rr-r nnrt9 Mcf
22795 Barton Road- Grand Terrace. California 92313-9295C$&9A?d X ITEM NO.
3
3.4.6 Design Review/Discretionary Action
Developer's plans shall be subject to normal discretionary reviews required according to the
City Municipal Code, General Plan, State and Federal laws. To the extent possible, the
project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council prior to the
execution of the DDA.
2
Januar,. 19, 2000 1nla,d Pacific advisors.Inc.
52:5 Canyon Crest Drive
Building 300.Suite 360
Riverside.CA 92507
Thomas J. Schwab (909) 686-I462
City Manager Fax(909)682-6058
CITY O:GRA\-D TERRACE
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace. CA 923)13-5295
Re: Town Square Project
Dear Nir. Schwab:
It was a pleasure meeting with you and Patrizia �faterassi on Jams 7tn �,
Pacific .-advisors (IPA) is prepared to move for%vard -with a comprehensive developms we ent discussed.1 n forand
Town Square project, including preparation of a conceptual site Plan, o the
schedule of performance and responsibilities. However, before we undertake oth st work. we woauld
like the assurance of having an exclusive right to negotiate with the Agency for development would
project.
P of the
Our company and its staff have developed manv successful projects in the Inland Empire
elsewhere in Southern California. We are highly qualified to meeting the demand p and
project envisioned for your community. Vl-e are prepared to more forward quicklys �zh h��;g9e
(ninety) days will be plenty'of time to determine i;-hether the project is feasible and if so. to core 0
terms with you on a Disposition and Development.-agreement. to
A proposed Agreement Concerning the Exclusive Right to Negotiate is enclosed. We will attend th
Agency Board meeting on January 27`h in case the members have any questions. In the meant' e
we have enclosed a brochure describing IPA and some of our projects and clients. tee'
Thank you very much for the opportunity to work N;ith you on this project.
Very tru . Ours.
INLA ACIFIC AD RS, INC
B ce omas
Vice President
Attachment "A"
AGREEMENT CONCERNING EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
1.0 PARTIES AND DATE
This Agreement is made on this 27th day of January, 2000 (the "Effective Date"), by
and between the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, a public
agency, created and authorized to transact business pursuant to the California Health and
Safety Code ("Agency'), and Inland Pacific Advisors, Inc., a California corporation, or
permitted assignee ("Developer').
2.0 RECITALS
2.1 The Project. In furtherance of the objectives of the Community Redevelopment
Law, Agency has formed a redevelopment'project area in order to undertake the clearance,
reconstruction, development and rehabilitation of blighted areas in the City of Grand Terrace
(the "Project Area"). Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area, Agency desires
to carry out a mixed-use redevelopment project known as the "Town Square Project."
2.2 Developer's Proposal. Developer desires to purchase and develop and/or
redevelop certain real property located within the Project Area in accordance with the
Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. The subject property is depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Property"). Developer desires to negotiate a contract with
Agency (either a "Disposition and Development Agreement" or an Owner Participation
Agreement," hereinafter collectively referred to as "DDA") concerning Agency's possible
provision of assistance to the Developer. This assistance may include, without limitation or
guarantee, a land write-down, marketing assistance, down payment assistance, rent
guarantees, off-site improvements, and/or fast-tracking of plans and permits.
3.0 TERMS
3.1 Negotiation
3.1.1 Good Faith Negotiations. Agency and Developer agree, for the period set
forth below, to negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of a DDA for consideration by
Agency and Developer concerning the Property.
The term "negotiate" as used herein shall preclude Agency from seeking,
considering or accepting development proposals from persons or entities other than Developer,
or discussing with other developers or investors plans for the Project (defined below) which
might be acceptable to Agency. However, Agency shall not be precluded from furnishing to
other persons or entities unrelated to Developer information in the possession of Agency
relating to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area, the implementation of which will be
within Agency's purview to administer. Agency may also furnish any other information which
(IPA.ERN) Page 1 of 5 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
Initials frL
it would normally furnish to persons requesting information from Agency concerning its
activities,-goals and matters of a similar nature.
3.1.2 Negotiation Period. Agency and Developer hereby establish a negotiating.
period ("Negotiation Period") beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement, and
continuing to and including ninety (90) days from that date. If, .at the expiration of the
Negotiation Period, Developer has not signed and submitted to Agency a DDA which is
acceptable to Agency staff and ready for submission to Agency's governing board for final
approval, then this Agreement will terminate unless the Negotiation Period is further extended
by mutual agreement of the parties. If the DDA is submitted less than thirty (30) days prior
to the end of the Negotiation Period, the Negotiation Period will automatically be extended for
ninety (90) days from the date of submittal to enable Agency to take actions necessary to
review and consider the DDA and, if approved, to, execute same.
If, following Developer's submittal of the DDA, Agency decides not to approve
the agreement or Agency makes a good faith determination that further negotiations will not
lead to a DDA which Agency will approve, this Agreement will automatically terminate without
penalty to either party.
3.1.3 Termination Prior tc Expiration of Negotiation Period. Upon completion
and review of the development plan and project proformas required under Section 3.4.2 of this
Agreement, Agency and Developer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement if, based
upon the information set forth in those plans and documents, the parties believe in good faith'
that further negotiation will not lead to a DDA which either of the parties will approve.
3.2 Consideration. Any proposed assistance or consideration to be rendered by
Agency and Developer under the DDA will be established by Agency and Developer as a result
of negotiations during the Negotiation Period. Such consideration will be based upon, but not
necessarily limited to, such factors as market conditions, density of development,-costs"bf`
development, risks of development, estimated or actual profits, and the fair market value of
the uses permitted to be developed.
3.3 Method of Financing. Upon request, Developer will make available and provide
full disclosure to Agency of the methods of financing to be used in the development of the
Project (defined below). Any such requests for information shall be in writing, must be
reasonable, and shall take into consideration the progress made to date in the negotiations.
Developer shall answer all such requests for financing information to the full extent said
information is available. a
Agency acknowledges that Developer is a private entity, and agrees to keep
confidential any and all financial information submitted by Developer pursuant to this
Agreement, subject to Agency's need to disclose such information under applicable public
disclosure laws. Agency further agrees to refrain from releasing information provided by
Developer pursuant to this Agreement unless Agency's legal counsel determines, after
consultation with Developer's legal counsel, that the release of the information is required by:
the Califomia Public Records Act or other applicable statutes or laws, or a court orders such
release. In the event Agency determines hereunder it is required to disclose or release any
(tPA.Ewr) Page 2 of 5 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
Initials `b
such information during the term of this Agreement, Agency shall notify Developer of its
decision to release such information.
3.4. Proposed Development
3.4.1 Scope of Development. The proposed development (the "Project") will
provide housing for senior citizens, including subsidized units to meet State housing
requirements for the provision of very low-, low- and moderate-income housing, and a mixed-
use retail/commercial center, including the provision of a central public space.
r�
3.4.2 Concept of Development. A comprehensive development plan for the -
Project, including basic concept drawings and financial proformas, will be prepared by
Developer during the Negotiation Period and submitted to Agency within sixty (60) days from
the Effective Date of this Agreement. Any and all such plans, drawings and proforma
documents shall be owned and controlled by, and proprietary to, Developer and shall be
returned to Developer, together with all copies thereof, upon request. Such development plan
will contain or address the residential, retail/commercial, public use, and parking aspects of the
Project, conceptual renderings, and number of units and approximate square footage in each
use category. The development plan, concept drawings, and proformas shall be subject to
preliminary review and comment by Agency staff, which may require that additional
information be provided or that adjustments to the plan, drawings and/or proformas be made.
Developer shall promptly respond to all such requests for additional information.
3.4.3 Preparation of DDA. Developer shall be responsible for preparation of all
draft and final Disposition and Development Agreements DDAs, which are subject to the
review and approval of Agency.
3.4.4 Studies and Reports. Developer agrees to report on the status of the
performance of its obligations hereunder and to provide copies of all studies being made
hereunder by or for Developer.
3.4.5 Cooperation and Additional Information. Developer shall generally
cooperate with Agency and supply all other documents and information as may be reasonably
requested by Agency.
3.5 Agency Responsibilities
3.5.1 Assistance and Cooperation. Agency shall cooperate to the extent legally
permissible in providing Developer with appropriate information and assistance on all relevant
matters.
3.5.2 Public Hearing. If negotiations culminate in a DDA signed by Developer,
such DDA will become effective only if and after it has been considered and approved by
Agency's governing board at a public meeting in accordance with California law.
3.5.3 Supplemental Information. Agency reserves the right at any time to
make reasonable requests for additional information and data from Developer, and Agency
(WkERN) Page 3 of 5 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
Initials
specifically reserves the right to obtain further information, data and commitments to ascertain
the ability and capacity of Developer to develop the Property expeditiously.
4.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
4.1 Hold Harmless. Each party hereto ("Indemnifying Party") shall indemnify,
defend, protect and hold the other party ("Indemnified Party") harmless from and against any
loss, liability, claim, damage or expense (including reasonable attorney fees and costs) suffered
or incurred by.the Indemnified Party to the extent arising out of any loss, damage, injury or
death resulting from or in connection with the Indemnifying Party's activities upon the Property
and/or performance under this Agreement.
4.2 Attorney Fees. In the event either party shall bring legal action to enforce or
interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive
reasonable attorney fees and costs.
4.3 California Law. This Agreement.shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the
State of California.
4.4 Severability. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be
held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable,
such provisions shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this
Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.
4.5 Integration. This Agreement supersedes all prior discussions and writings and
l J, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof.
4.6 Waiver and Modification. No waiver or modification of this Agreement will be
binding upon either party unless made in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of each party.
4.7 Authority of Signatories. Each person signing this Agreement on behalf of a
party hereby represents and warrants that he or she has full authority on behalf of such party
to do so, and that this Agreement is binding upon said party.
4.8 Interpretation. The captions or paragraph headings of this Agreement are for
the convenience of the parties. To the extent the captions or paragraph headings are in
conflict with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
4.9 Not to be Construed Against Drafter. The parties hereby agree that the terms
of this Agreement are the product of their mutual negotiations, and any ambiguity in the terms
of this Agreement is not to be construed against the party deemed to be the drafter of the
Agreement.
4.10 Assignment. Neither party may assign, encumber or otherwise transfer any right
or interest under this Agreement without the written consent of the other party, which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld. Agency hereby agrees that any assignment by Developer
(MAER►+) Page 4 of 5 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
TOWN SQUARE PRO ECT
Initials
i
to an existing or newly-formed business entity in which Developer holds a controlling (greater
than 50%) interest shall be and hereby is deemed approved by Agency.
It witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth
above.
Community Redevelopment Agency Inland Pacific Advisors, Inc.,
of the City of Grand Terrace a Californi orporation
By: By:
Dan Buchanan, Vice-Chairman Bruce Thom , Vice-President
(IMERM) Page 5 of 5 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE
TOWN SQUARE PROJECT
Initials fir-
1�►nu pip nru oil ruuou �'1f1, Last hlvorsldo Land Company, M.U. 6/44 Clty of Grand Terrace 1167 - 23
,• N ruaa ruuur u�r.
Tax Rate Area
111 , 16 0 01
1111
4 ti0#--- — --�- — — -- — — -- — iWNW
1
• ss x
„. u, Iu
,1 , .,
II
� 10 0l
1
I w
1 '
1 I , 1 At. ,
u I u Ic► JI
. 1
11 AC. 2 _
I o os o, a of o I
I
1.l� At. Lf1 ,C 165 AC. 111 At 111 At
— —
I '
y
•, I u
IA PAIY ( I SIR[II x
Ilnsfo
f•II.11 fl
Assessor's Atop
Ptn. N.E'1/4, Sec. S Book 1167 Pogo 23
JUNE 1998 T.2S., R.4W. Son Bernardino County
i
F-1
r ?1►1. Lo51 Rivor'Slde Land Ca; " any, M.d. 6,s City of Grand Terrace 1167 - 31
a uulq tumor ONLY, Taw Role Area
I/1 16001
lost
_—
I•.Ioo
IIr UNION 011 „
f 11�11
3�3 3j COMMON (01 Pln. 1 0l .4,
Pot. 1 S 6 -
y+ a
1! I !JI AC.
o, 3.3J AC. 3)3 Par. 2 b�S
In 3I3 AC
1 ISO u1.11•ISI V' .a = 01 S 2 —•..._ ;il"li
rl,. r,l. I
rr
pin :
_ oo„ 1
IS AC.) ..._ . _
I 111.11 ,.1 „ — — - i 1
37 36 38 10 41 12 /3 14 45 /6 /7 IE 19 SO 51 52 53 51 55 56
1
�` 11 10 JI IJ 3! N 23 31 31 f1 JI !O 31 33 31 31 33 3f 3r 31 1
\ Pin. 1 L '33
is O COMMON (01
\` II 36 S3 73 31 SS 31 S! ft SI L63
61 S
�.� ` SI 7667 13 II Ib 3e
O Ir 35 71 73 72 71 70 69 �O� 6e 6] 66 65 6/ 13�3/ 31 71 %
10 75 y' — 96 97 96 99
3 IS 33 02 83 54 85 86 B7
Pln. 'P If 32 a 1, cs 11 13 c1
1e 3o n It $
Pin; IS 1tI N 13 31 at 00 1
I$.Jr AC.1
32 � IlrlSlo
Pin. Iloct No. 11135. Y.B. 155/40-42 1.31-9I At
Polcel YIP No. 4551, P Y. 42/44 Assessor's Mop
Pln• I'fw No. 9001. 11.0 126/59.60 Pin. N.E.1/4, Sec. S Book 1167 Page 31
JUNE tots Pin. 1101D1o11 IIICI. R.S. 1/9 T.2S., R.4W, San Bernardino County
fall ruu lot ul eY1r11f 1' lll. t. (ISI 11 I.V C'f 5i L! I 'C)II(l CU1111)uii Y , Ni,1.1 (! 14 1'ily of I;rund Iuffuru m/ Z 4
e/ le 1411,991111 1/11110/ 1111,
111J1 f2ule Area
te, �
16001 1G004
J � •
VA
left
,1 ( 11 .. 111 PAIY AVENUE r.loo•
:J. Ir.lf , I 11.17 111.11 ,. I 11.11 11.{, u ,
34 1J •1•
u I
1 Its rn
1 OJ „1.11 o�*r n1,lA '! II Ill.11
s B 71 Jo
2
1
Par. 2 -�= T 7+ J JI 12 u{u 111 Par. 1 ;I_ w n
S2 11 _
I of 10 _ ,
\� _ 6^
\ W 11 __ _
T !1 11 JJ I/ Z
to {. Ulr ul !
^ ^ 30
I
I al - slaltr. . ., - _ � �
15
01 (9.14 AC CO i.1.I- I
1111.,.! .1 Ir 11 I{.11 .� 11
I
Par. I ,' ,r �• 13 , 2e O
O - 2 I J - J I 11 J I \'_� 117
6 '
aS 01 ae -�r ,11 i1111
1 28 (Q
26
,� a u n TrT
IT 1 21 22 2] 21 2s It 11� X
01 I J 1 c1 1�
;f 10 11 0 _ 3 21 11
is I 4
.I i
1/1 If 111.11 , 1 ` 10.11 61.11 61.11 1).1) 1{ 11 I /1 tl 11
00
- - f- - - = 8{-BEfkr-- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - �- - —r — tiff -
I
1
1
25 j
• 1 ---IIv IS10 —._
Ilact No, 1005I, Y.B. 148/81-8I 1.71•te 11
1100 No. 9199, 111. 09/11•48 Assessor's Mop
Parcel Yep No. 085, P.Y. 43/54 Pin. N.E.1/4, Sec. 5 Book 1167 Pogo 24
JUNE 1996 PIa. Palctl Yap No. 1017, P.U. 10/70 T.2S„ R.4W, Son Bernordlno County
I
C�Ti
611-
R^ Community Services Department
Staff Report
CRA ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID NO. GTB: 99-07- CIVIC CENTER RESTORATION
AND WEATHERPROOFING PROJECT.
FUNDING REQUIRED
DISCUSSION:
In October 1999, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the bid of the Civic Center
Restoration and Weatherproofing Project. In total, the project includes the removal and
replacement of masonry wall areas in the North-Westerly portion of the Civic Center structure.
Throughout the course of the bidding of the project, the Project Manager's WLC Architects
extended the bid of the project via addenda to address various questions and issues which arose
during the bidding period. Additionally, the City also proceeded with the purchase of masonry
brick blocks to allow the process to be expedited once a contract is awarded.
On February 1, 2000, bids were opened in the City Clerk's Office as follows:
1. ASR Constructors, Inc. $147,167.00
2. Krest Group Inc. $228,740.00
Attached to this report is an evaluation and recommendation from WLC recommending that the
Redevelopment Agency award GTB: 99-07 to ASR Constructors Inc. in the amount of
$147,167.00. WLC has qualified the bid and ASR has indicated they are ready to proceed with
the project.
Staff is recommending a budget and appropriation in the amount of$201,994.00. The budget
breakdown is as follows:
■ ASR Constructors, Inc. $147,167.00
■ Contingency (15%) $ 22,075.00
■ Block Materials $ 7,752.00
■ Masonry Inspection/Testing $ 25,000.00
Staff will be meeting with ASR and WLC prior to the Agency Meeting and will provide a
proposed schedule at that time.
► CRA AGENDA ITEM NO.
CIVIC CENTER MASORNRY RESTORATION PROJECT
AGENDA REPORT: AWARD OF BID
Page 2 of 2
RECOMAIEN-DATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors:
1. AWARD BID NO. GTB: 99-07- CIVIC CENTER RESTORATION AND
WEATHERPROOFING PROJECT TO ASR CONSTRUCTORS, INC IN THE AMOUNT
OF$14 7.167.00, AND
2. APPROVE A BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $201,994.00,
AND
3. -AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF APPROPRIATE AGREEMENTS �l
FISCAL LNIPACT:
Staff is recommending a budget and appropriation in the amount of$201,994.00.
ATTACIDIENT:
RECOMMENDATION FROM WLC ARCHTECTS ON AWARD OF BID
N,
W L C
Arc '► � tes
lorry WON,AA • C"wr At Wwn,M • Ro6d.1.46mky,A14 •!onus P.G.Cowrlo,Au • ttWhL&;am AU
ipp
February 3, 2000
Mr.John Donley
-- Assistant City Manager
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Re: Bid Opening Results
Masonry Restoration and Structural Repairs
City of Grand Terrace Citizc Centcr
Project No.97-101.40
Dear John:
Based upon the results of the bid opening on Tuesday,February 1,2000 and further review of the
bidders qualifications,WLC believes ARS Constructors is fully qualified to perform the wrnk in
the contract documents within the time line and budget specified. Therefore, WLC finds that a
contract should be awarded to ARS Constructors in order for them to proceed as required,
Very truly yours,
Y WrFF
tect,
•pal .
LW j
P4710100xg-itr
Yu,il-a 0wo 16"r•
1 'C470 foetbti-1ulemrJ Ra-sdanColic 91730.3751 ph: ye 111C Tan 6 9C9090q oz9Q9 y0 9910t am, a ■�o 93631±-11301 •aA:916 353 9922 fax.916 355 9950
0
D
o a
of (6ranb
.m.
atton.
DAFFODIL DAYS MONTH
March 2000
WHEREAS,the American Cancer Society is the nationwide community-based voluntary health
organization dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health problem;and
WHEREAS,the American Cancer Society is committed to preventing cancer,saving lives from
cancer,and diminishing suffering from cancer through research,education,advocacy,and service;and
WHEREAS,the American Cancer Society is dedicated to providing hope,progress,and answers
to every person struggling with cancer and to anyone who has questions about cancer;and
WHEREAS,it is a fact that for the fist time in human history, cancer mortality and incidence
rates are on the decline;and
WHEREAS,theAmerican Cancer Society supports research,education and service to save lives,
reduce cancer incidence, and improve the quality of life for cancer patients and their families;and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society supports these efforts through the Daffodil Days
campaign held every year during the third week of March;and
WHEREAS, the daffodil is the fast flower of spring and has come to symbolize the hope of a
world free from cancer;and
WHEREAS,the goal of the Daffodil Days campaign is to raise$3 8 million statewide and S10,000
from the Loma Linda/Colton Unit;and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society is grateful for the community's support of Daffodil
Days and will rise the funds to continue the mission and vision of the organization;
NOW,THEREFORE,I,Byron R Matteson,Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace,on behalf ofthe
City Council,do hereby proclaim March 2000 as Daffodil Days Month in the City of Grand Terrace.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
This 101 day of February,2000.
4 �
�� , � , , /�
III
� irll �
r �
r f
� 1 r l l 1 "
1 1 r � r � r � r
r �
1 r � r �
r �
. � _
� � � �
• . �
� � �
— � � �
► �
� � �
� � �
� s
~ t� • �
� _ _ —+�
_ � �
• ,
��. . \ �
� � � �
� � I � r r
i � � �
� •
� •
i
• r
• ' / / /
� � ► �
•
- � � • 11 r � / / , / / - /.. � . / i / � �
� •
� �
� ►
� - ► �
� • � �
� � • ��
i � / / � / i / i / r _ ,/ a : i / � i � �
• �
� � �
_ �
•
� � � �
► �
� � �
�� � • '�
____ • �
..��:.� •' L . �
•Y �I�r�y I� 7 r��yj _ � �
.� 'Y !!ll'�v t��17 .fit 4� ,1� e
� M •
_�V M -�
_ _ r;��w_:�._
.�- - - - _ :-.i
_ ,
. _
� .
. �
_ .
. _
1 1 ! 6 f ! 1 1 1 I r l f l l 1 � � � � � � � � � � � !�
f
� � � 1 ��
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE `` -)l���CiL /-►4=riiJvwL
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0003
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
CHECK NO, VENDOR :;: DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
13185 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP INS. NOV. 99 1,159.86
13222 CHRISTIE THIERRY BIRTHDAY BONUS 50.00
13223 WILSON'S FRAME-UP FRAME FOR COUNCILMAN LARKIN PICTURE 21.55
13224 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE DISABILITY INS. 1,677.46
13225 JULIE A QUIROZ PERSONAL LEAVE-CORRECTION 86.71
13226 CYNTHIA RUIZ PERSONAL LEAVE-CORRECTION 44.64
13227 DIANA CONDOR PERSONAL LEAVE-CORRECTION 9.64
13228 ROSA MACIAS PERSONAL LEAVE-CORRECTION 18.60
13229 RITCHIE HERNDON BLOCK WALL-BORDERING PARK 1,100.00
13231 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP INS. DEC 99 2,705.94
13232 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE FEB. 00 8,542.60
13234 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE MHN FEBRUARY 525.22
13235 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION DECEMBER &JANUARY PURCHASES 2,837.95
13236 PERS EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 3,863.35
43186 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO. INC. REPAIR MOWER 572.37
43187 ADDINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERING -PROJECT REVIEW 120.00
43188 MATTHEW ADDINGTON STIPEND PAYMENT 25.00
43189 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF SO CA PUBLIC OFFICIALS BOND 175.00
43190 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 15.57
n 43191 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECEMBER BILLING-1215 SIGNAULIGHTS 120.12
p 43193 CARPET HOUSE CARPET EOC 700.00
C 43194 CENTRAL CITY SIGN SERVICE SIGNS .293.08
Z 43195 DATA PRINT COMP ACCESSORIES/SUPPLIES 395.28
n
r- 43196 DATA TICKET INC. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 100.00
43197 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES ANNUAL LICENSING FEE-CHILD CARE 500.00
I) 43198 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP. PAINT/SUPPLIES 32.22
m 43200 MARYETTA FERRE STIPEND PAYMENT 25.00
p 43201 HAMMON JENSEN WALLEN &ASSOC. DIGITAL PHOTOS- GIS 2,400.00
a 43202 HONEYWELL INC. MAINT. AC/HEAT UNIT 2,730.60
43203 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 427.50
0 1
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000 CHECK REGISTER NO: C0003
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
CHECK NO. VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
43204 INMARK 2 X 10 NAME PLATE FOR LAMPE 21.55
43205 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP. BREAD PRODUCTS- CHILD CARE 76.95
43206 JOHN W. LAMPE CONTRACT LABOR FOR 1-19- 1/27 1,598.40
43207 MANPOWER TEMP HELP 1/10/00 THRU 1/21/00-FINANCE 812.00
43208 MARVIN SANDERS REFUND SANDERS-SEWER 185.10
43209 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS LONG DISTANCE 1,055.00
43210 MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS COMPUTER SUPPORT 380.00
43211 NOVELL INC. NOVELL SUPPORT CONNECTION 495.00
43212 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 235.72
43213 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CHARGES 258.39
43215 PROTECTION ONE ALARM SERVICES,99/00 75.00
43216 RICHARD ROLLINGS OPEN/CLOSING PARKS 1/1-1/31 710.00
43217 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FUELING SVCS.99/00 122.76
43218 SARAH J. GREEN REWARD FOR INFO. ON VANDALISM 500.00
43219 SO. CA EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY 3,007.30
43220 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND WORKERS COMP 1/1-2/1/00 1,621.16
43221 SYSCO FOOD SUPPLIES 541.94
43222 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER JANUARY GAS 582.69
43223 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES INC. AMBER SAFETY LIGHT FOR VAN 105.60
43224 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC. 24-6 VOLT BATTERIES 51.72
43226 FRAN VAN GELDER STIPEND PAYMENT 25.00
43228 WALMART HOLIDAY SUPPLIES 148.60
43229 WAXIE JANITOR SUPPLIES 839.49
43230 WESTERN EXTERMINATORS CO. PEST CONTROL 190.00
43231 DOUG WILSON STIPEND PAYMENT 25.00
43232 XEROX CORPORATION USAGE, COPIER MACHINE 452.79
JANUARY PAYROLL 117,225.70
TOTAL $162,618.12
Jai
i
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY COUNCIL MINiPrES
REGULAR MEET NG - JANUARY 27, 2000
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the
Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California,
on January 27, 2000, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor
Dan Buchanan, Mayor Pro Tem
1 Herman Hilkey, Councilmember
Lee Ann Garcia, Councilmember
Don Larkin, Councilmember
Tom Schwab, City Manager
John Donlevy, Assistant City Manager
Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk
Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director
Virgil Barham, Building.& Safety Director
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Sgt. Tony Allen, Sheriffs Department
ABSENT: Lt. Pete Ortiz, Sheriff's Department
The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Salim Elias, Azure Hills Seventh-Day
Adventist Church followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Don Larkin.
ITEMS TO DELETE
City Manager Schwab indicated that he would like to delete item 2A. Consider Support
for LAFCO - John Freedman, Candidate/Council Member Redlands. Mr. Freedman is
unable to attend the meeting to make his presentation.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-2000-13 MOTION. BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the following consent
calendar items:
3A. Approval of Check Register No. C0002
3B. Ratify 01-27-00 CRA Action
3C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
3D. Approval of 01-13-00 Minutes
3E. Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1999
3F. Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Appropriations Limit
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.3P
i
I
Council Minutes
January 27, 2000
Page 2
3G. Adopt Statement of Investment Policy
PUBLIC COMMENT
Barbara Pfenni hausen, 22111 Ladera Street, wished everyone a Happy New Year. She
expressed her concern that the City did not display any Christmas decorations this past
year. She also expressed her concern with the loss of long time employees.
ORAL REPORTS t
5A. Committee Reports
1. Park and Recreation Committee
a. Resignation of Committee Member (Ortiz)
CC-2000-14 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0,to accept the resignation of Park
and Recreation Committee member Manuel Ortiz and direct staff to send a letter
of gratitude and thanks.
5B. Council Reports
Mayor Pro Tem Buchanan, stated that the Library gave each Council Member a calendar.
He reported that at the Plans and Programs Committee meeting for SANBAG he was
selected to Chair the committee.
Councilmember Garcia, reported that she and City Manager Schwab attended the East
Valley Coalition meeting which was very informative. The Inland Empire Division of the
League held their meeting where it was stated that Cities need to be better about letting the
League know about legislative actions. She expressed her desire to keep the quality of
Grand Terrace good and to raise the spirit of.volunteerism throughout the community.
Councihnember Hilkey, thanked everyone for the cards and well wishes with the passing
of his father.
Councilmember Larkin, believes that there is a strong volunteer effort within the
community. He indicated that more and more, people are turning to government for the
answers and that they should be turning to each other to make things happen. He reported
that he attended the League of California Cities Inland Empire Division meeting and
commended Councilmember Garcia on the meeting. He stated that he is a member of the
Board of Directors for Riverside Highland Water Company and feels that the joint billing-
is going well and has been beneficial. He indicated that his e-mail address is
larkin d0email.msn.com.
Council Minutes
January 27, 2000
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARN
6A. Community Development Block Grant Program: Public Hearing
Assistant Citv Manager Donlevy, indicated that representatives from the County of San
Bernardino are at the meeting to receive input on the prioritization of needs for Community
Development Block Grant Funds.
Norm Buckner,County of San Bernardino Development Department, indicated the County
Board of Supervisors holds an annual public hearing to determine the communities that*are
participating in the Community Development Block Grant Program and to find out what
the needs of the communities are. Typically the public hearings are held twice a year and
the second part of the process is where the Board of Supervisors entertains any
modifications to any proceeding, programs or adds on any programs that the different
metropolitan areas would like to entertain. He stated that he is primarily here to find out
what the needs of Grand Terrace are. The Senior Center has been the primary target area
in the community with the exception of a few minor upgrades at the parks.
Councilmember Hilkev, indicated that he understands the limitations on the CDBG funds.
He stated that the Junior High is located in Grand Terrace, however, student that attend
not only come from Grand Terrace but they come from South Colton, Reche Canyon and,
Cooley Ranch. Their economic base is much different than the neighborhoods around the
school and same thing happens to Little League by designation from the National Little
League Association and questioned if this can be taken into consideration when we would
like to make improvement to the joint use facilities with CDBG funds.
Mr. Buckner, indicated that the low to moderate income target areas are composed by'
census tracks and the last census track showed that the area that the Junior High is in is not
a low to moderate income area. He stated that HUD does not take into consideration that
individuals outside of the area utilize the facility. Their consideration is the area in which
the school was built to serve. He indicated that he would be glad to take any proposal to
HUD for consideration.
Community and Economic Development Director Materassi, stated that the City has two
problem areas on an economic development perspective, we are poor in businesses in the
down town area and poor in jobs in the industrial area and questioned if there is a way we
can get some economic development use of the funds.
Mr. Buckner, responded that their office offers a multitude of different programs,
however, the common ground for all of their programs is low to moderate income.
Community and Economic Development Director Materassi,indicated that the commercial
area has no businesses and she believes that it would be considered.a blighted area.
Mr. Buckner, responded that it is not considered blight and it would not be an eligible
Council Minutes
January 27, 2000
Page 4
project.
Mayor Pro Tem Buchanan, stated that a way the money could be spent in a qualified
manner would be to have a business start up assistance program or a business incubation
program where the person applying meets the HUD requirements.
Assistant City Manager Donleyy, stated that the City receives approximately $37,000 of
which 15% of that can be used for service type programs. The balance has to be used for
Capital Improvements. -
Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public. There being none he returned discussion
to Council.
Assistant Ci1y Manager Donlevy, indicated that Mr.Buckner has given him questionnaires
for residents to give their input and they will be available in the Community Services
Department.
Councilmember Hilkey, questioned if the census tracks are going to change.
Mr. Buckner, stated that if there have been changes since the last census the tracks will
reflect that change.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7A. Park and Recreation Committee
CC-2000-15 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, to disband the Park and
Recreation Committee and send out appropriate letters to the committee members.
Motion dies due to the lack of a second.
CC-2000-16 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, SECOND BY
COUNCH MEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 3-2 (MAYOR MATTESON AND
MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN VOTED NO),to leave the Park and Recreation
Committee as it is currently and direct staff to revise the description of the Park
and Recreation Committee's direction and goals.
7B. Signalization of the Intersection of Barton Road at Grand Terrace Road/Honey Hill
Drive.
CC-2000-17 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN, CARRIED 5-0,to direct staff to proceed with the
implementation of the bicycle lane grant including the realignment of the
intersection of Barton Road at Honey Hill Drive and Grand Terrace Road and
pending the realignment that crosswalk warning signs be posted and that when the
` I
Council Minutes
January 27,2000
Page 5
realignment is designed and developed that staff take into consideration the future
signalization of the intersection and plan for and include all the efficiencies in that
process and once the realignment is being completed the issue be brought back to
Council with staff recommendations for the future of that crosswalk.
7C. Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Twenty-Year
Transportation Plan.
CC-2000-18 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER LARKIN,CARRIED 3-2(COUNCILMEMBERS HILKEY
AND GARCIA VOTED NO), to approve a Resolution of the City Council
Adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year
Transportation Plan for Fiscal Year 1999-2004.
7D. Technical Report on Barton Road,Median Improvement Project from Canal Street
to Mt. Vernon Avenue.
Craig Neustaedter, TEP, gave an overview of the technical report that was done for a
Barton Road Median Improvement project from Canal Street to Mt. Vernon.
Councilmember Garcia, indicated that she would like to see staff receive input from
property owners that would be affected by the installation of a raised median on Barton
Road from Canal Street to Mt. Vernon Avenue.
Councilmember Larkin, indicated that he agrees with the concept of a median on Barton
Road, however, he feels it would be pre-mature for staff to move forward with receiving
input by affected property owners. He feels that it would be more appropriate to wait until
a town center project is developed.
Councilmember Hilkey, concurred with Councilmember Larkin and feels that it may be
too restrictive.
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Approval of Emergency Purchase of Replacement File Server Computer and
Appropriation of Funds for FY 1999-2000 Budget
CC-2000-19 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the emergency
purchase of a replacement file server computer; appropriate $15,000 from
available, unappropriated General Fund Balance; and to adjust cost allocation to
allocate said computer indirect overhead costs to all applicable cost centers.
8C. Selection of City & CRA Auditor for Fiscal Years 1999-2000, 2000-2001, 2001-
2002
Council Minutes
January 27, 2000
Page 6
CC-2000-20 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY
COUNCELMEh1BER GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0,to approve Vavrinek, Trine,Day
and Company as the City and CRA auditors for fiscal year 1999-2000, 2000-2001,
2001-2002 and authorize staff to engage Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company, in
a renewable contract for up to three years of auditing services.
8B. Request to Engage Auditors for Audit of Child Care Programs
r�
CC-2000-21 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BUCHANAN, SECOND BY
COUNCILMalBER HILKEY, CARRIED 5-0, to authorize Staff to engage the
firm of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company, CPA's LLP to conduct the first year
audit of Grand Terrace Child Care Programs for attendance and receipting and
internal controls.
CLOSED SESSION - None
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council Meeting at 8:45 p.m., until the next CRA/City
Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, February 10, 2000 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
C- -
GRAND TERR c Community and Economic Development
Department
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP)
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
Cities are responsible to submit to SANBAG their plans for capital improvement
projects that are funded with federal money or directly impact state or federal facilities.
The SANBAG TIP is incorporated by SCAG into the RTIP and finally approved by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
In the past, SANBAG has accepted RTIP programs without a resolution of City Council
responsibility. This year a standard resolution is required and is very strict in that the
cities shall either have funds to cover their projects or shall not include them in the list.
In previous years, SANBAG encouraged the cities to treat the RTIP process as a "wish
list" of projects cities plan to ask for funds. This year the process has evolved to a list
of"financially constrained" projects which shall have sure funding at the time of listing.
This strict clause is the reason we have deleted all but one of our projects - the
remaining project is the bicycle lane/street improvements along Main Street. This
project was maintained on the RTIP list because we received a grant to implement it.
Please refer to RTIP submittal to SANBAG from Craig Neustaedter dated October 29,
1999, Attachment B.
Two other projects not listed in the RTIP memo and deleted during the last RTIP cycle
included a potential Multi modal Transfer Station at the northeast corner of Mt. Vernon
and Barton Road, and the reconstruction of the overpass on Barton Road over the I-
215 freeway. Recently, we heard that SANBAG's staff has not been able to delete
those two projects due to requirements of air quality conformity findings. Those
projects are no longer feasible and are not covered in our resolution.
Projects listed as TCM, or Transportation Control Measures, are no longer allowed to
be deleted. However, we had already requested deletion of those two projects in
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-529tftF4LSf-1--ftP-NDA ITEM NO.
previous cycles. Please refer to Attachment C for Grand Terrace projects originally
listed as TCMs and previously deleted from the RTIP for lack of funding source and
other reasons.
While SANBAG provides good technical support to cities in terms of filling out forms,
providing sample ordinances and reminding us of SCAG's RTIP deadlines, there is little
or no help provided to cities in terms of specific content with the exception of the °RTIP
Guidelines" from SCAG. SANBAG staff is not oriented to help city staff in selecting
applicable projects from their"wish list", nor orienting cities on what type projects are
more likely to be funded by certain sources.
Federal funds will be disbursed only if a priority project is in the RTIP. At the same time
a priority project cannot be listed in the RTIP until funding has been arranged. Staff,
therefore, will work closely with SANBAG to include any appropriate priority projects in
future RTIP cycles. This process involves the preparation of a draft capital
improvement plan (CIP) to the City Council.
Should the Council be interested in previous RTIP submissions, such as 1993, 1995
and 1997 please call Pat Lunsford at the Community and Economic Development
Department at 430-2247. The file is available for review.
Recommendation
At this time, staff recommends the City Council move to confirm the RTIP submittal
done by staff last October, 1999 with amendments faxed to SANBAG on January 5,
2000, and approve the attached standard resolution, Attachment A.
Respectfully submitted,
Patrizia Materassi
Community and Economic Development Director
Attachments: A- Draft Resolution
B - RTIP memo submitted to SANBAG on October 29, 1999
C - Grand Terrace TCM projects previously deleted from RTIP
w 1 . .\planning\cc\RTIP 2-2000.wpd
2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE HAS THE
RESOURCES TO FUND THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED FOR INCLUSION
IN THE FY 200012001-2005/2006 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING ITS COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENT
ALL OF THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED IN THE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace desires to include the submitted projects
in the San Bernardino County Transportation Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace warrants that full funding is committed
and available for projects submitted for programming in the first three years (FY
2000/01, 2001/02, 2002/03) of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program; and
that the City of Grand Terrace accepts responsibility for full funding of said projects and
warrants that no additional funding allocations are required of SANBAG for the City of
Grand Terrace to fully implement said projects therefore committing that the first three
years of the RTIP are financially constrained; and
WHEREAS, projects programmed in years 2003/04-2005/06 are projects
expected to receive future funding through anticipated revenues, therefore all projects
submitted for inclusion in the 2000/01-2005/06 RTIP are financially constrained; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), as
agency responsible for short-range capital and service planning and programming for
the San Bernardino County area, requires an approved Resolution from the governing
body of the Lead Agency for all projects included in the Transportation Improvement
Program; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG also requires that the Lead Agency include a financial
plan that demonstrates how the projects submitted for inclusion in the Transportation
Improvement Program can be implemented; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace, as the Lead Agency, possesses the legal
authority to submit the project for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program
and to finance, acquire, and construct the project.
Attachment "A"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Grand Terrace does hereby:
1) Affirm its continuing commitment to the project submitted for inclusion in the
2000/2001-2005/2006 Transportation Improvement Program; and
2) Certify that the City of Grand Terrace will enter into a contract with SANBAG
committing that it will carry out the project I.D. #SB 31860 identified as
transportation control measures (TCM) in the South Coast Air Basin consistent
with the project completion schedule of June 30, 2001; and
3) Certify that the City of Grand Terrace will allocate the necessary local match
funds contained within the project to carry out any federally approved project;
and
4) Certify that the City of Grand Terrace, as the Lead Agency, will comply with
applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National l
Environmental Policy Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Secretary of
the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic
Preservation, and any other Federal, State, and/or local laws, rules and
regulations.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10', day of February, 2000.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof. and of the City Council thereof. _ Y
I, BRENDA STANFILL, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 10t' day of January, 2000, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Brenda Stanfill
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
w:1.. AplanningWansportation\RT1P Resolution 2000-01 -2005-2006.wpd
TEP
P.O 6cx'8355 Phone=zx:
Irvine CA 92623 949 552 4357
October 29, 1999
To: Lisa Proe, SANBAG
From: C,aig S. Neustaedter ��
Subject: RTIP Amendments
Per the request cf Patrizia Materassi, I am transmitting RTIP submittal forms on b&alf
of the City of Grand Terrace.
Please call if ycu have questiors or comments.
C.C. Pa`.rizia Materassi
Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Attachment "B
SAS: .�...r -�_ i b ..
SAIN BERNARMO ASSOCIATED GOVEWYIENTS
2000/01 Through 2005/06
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form V
Agency: Grard Terrace Cone: P a t r i 2 i a
Nlateriassi Telephone: 909i824-6021
A envy Code: Date: 10 i z 2 - 9 o 9 i?3 3-7;z;
erect Description RTIP #: `e D 3136 0
Is Project being ADDED, DELETED, CONWLETED or,AIMENDED (Circle One)
Route or Street: M a ` ,n S t .
Pr Wed Limits: (Post Miles if on State H'h ) M t . .Vernon Av .. to W.
City/ Lknits
Aescriotio otL f Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder-bow many ft., rehabffltation-of what) (If project is
'regionally significant' refer to Pg. 18, 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Provide bicycle lanes
If this prQ!ect is heing amended please list
RTIFd 55- 31860
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) 1'9 9 8-2 0 0 5
Description of Amendment (what is being changed in this projeci) (from old to new):
] ) Schedule
2) Furd i nq
Proiect Part of an Approved Congestion M nag ent S)Zern [] yes No
Expected Completion Date of Project? 2 0 0
VAINkREN
z
PICO
U
MAN -
0.5 0 0.5 Miles
Air Quality Specific Information
Air Basin, Project in MDAB (Mojave Desert Air Basin)o S�eboth)
0uth Coast Air
Basin)(Please circle)(If project is in two different basins, ci (refer to Pg.48-
50)
Other Relevant Inforration
What page of98 RTP is-project fisted: 206 (Regionally Significant
Projects only) (refer-to attachments of RTP project list_ngs
State, aca! or Transit ?r-)ject (Circle Ore)
('Any project located on any state highway must be listed as State project)
Total Cost of Project: $9 t , 500.00
Program Code: (i.e. HE II, HB4N, etc.) its 8 (Refer to attached codes;
Project Type: (Refers to Reg tonally Significant Projects-Pg. 23
�S)
Environmental TN pe Code: (Neg. Dec., E1R, etc.) N • O e c (Refer to
Pg. 39)
Date of Environmental Document t h a
TC4i Code:_ _ --__ (Refer to Pg. 33)
Is Project Exempt from Air Quality Conformity- Analysis? t,Ton-capacity increasing
projec►} Yes 'x Nc If yes, what category does it fall under on the Federal
Exempt Project Listing? t:Refer to Pg. 34)
Yr. Fund Construct R.1_1W Engin.
Project Code(s) S (in 1.0001 S (in 51jm) S(in S 1,000)
f Funded' (i.e. C1�AQ,
Programmed STP, etc.)
2000 BLk Funds $8z,350 .00
2000 Local Funds S 7, 150 .00
3,500 -o0 $2 ,000.00
$2,000 .Oc.
V
a
SkN BER.NARDM ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
2000101 Through 2005106
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form �-
Agency:Sra id Terrace Contact: Pa tr i z i a Telephone; 909/824-6621
Agency Code: Date: Materassi F 909/783-7629
Project Description RTIP #: s s D 31854
Is Project being ADDED ELETE COIMPLETED or A:tiM'%MED (Circle One)
Route or Street: Barton Rd .
Project Limits: {Post Miles if on St^te High yT at l a Crosse 4v .
Description of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder-how many ft., rehabilitation-of what) (If project is
'regionally significant' refer to Pg. 18, 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guideliaes)
Coistruct 60 vehicle park and ride lot:
If_ this prQiCZ 'c being amended ]ease list ;
RTIP # SBD 31E54
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) ' 9 9 8-2 0 0 5
Description of Amendment (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
Project deletion
Project Part of anAppMyed Confest m
ion M nageent Syctem? [] yes €,J No,
Expected Completion Date of Project' n.a .
INSERT NIiP OF PROJECT HERE
s
I
SAN BERNAR.DINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
2000101 Through 2005/06 9I
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form ✓�"'
Agency: Grand Terrace Contact: Pa t r i z i a Telephone' :0 9/8 2 4-6 6 21
Materassi 509/783_7629
Agency Code: Date: o /a G
P_rQject Description RTIp #: s e 0 311856
is Project being ADDED, LETED O.NIPLETED or kN E` )ED (Circle One)
Route or Street; Mt. Vernon A v .
Project Limits: Most yiiles if on Sta Ba r ton Rd. tc Main S t .
Description of Project: (detailed-Le. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added}(If widening shoulder-how many fl,, rehabilitation-0of w�bat) (If project is
'regionally significant" refer to Pg. 18, 19 R 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
SpDt kice-iing for Bottleneck renoval ;2 lan-e total width)
If this project is jug amended, ple&w list ;
RTIP 1 580 31651
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) 1 g 9 8-2 0 0 5
Description-of Amendment (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
Project deletion
Project Part of an AoproFed Congestion 11ianagement System [ yes [ ] No
' Expected Completion Date of Project' n!a
s .INSERT MAP OF PROJECT HERE
i
SAN BERNAR.DINO ASSOCIATED GOVER NIOENTS
2000101 Tbrough 2005/06 '
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form
Agency: Grand -a r r a z e Contact: Pa t r i z i a Telephone:9 0 9/8 2 4-6 6 2'
Materassi
A end Code: Date: F 9%9/'g 3-'629
Project Description RTIP #: a D 31853 9
Is Project being ADDED,CELE�D, O'NPLETED or AMENDED (Circle One)
Route or Street: Barton R d .
Project L.IULg: (Post tililec if on State HigI avl h c,ex H i 1 1 s :o n , e .
%— ty limits .
Descriptiio of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently east and how many
lanes added)(If.viidening shoulder-how many A., rehabilitation-of what) (If project is
'regionally significant' refer to Pg. 18, 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes .
If this project is being-amended. please list :
RTIP# 5 B- 318 5 9
Which RTIP is project currently in C.e. 93-99, etc.) 1 a a 8-2 0 0 5
Description of amendment (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
Project deletion
Projed Part of an Approved Conggifion Management System F l Yes [ ] No
Expected Completion Date of Project? n/a
INSERT MAP OF PROJECT HERE
SAIN BERNARDNO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
2000101 Through 2005/06
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form
Pa tr i z i a Telepboae: 9C 9/824-6624
Agency: Grad Terrace Contact:
Materass � 0�3/783-7629
A enc Code: Date: ., ,
Project D: escription RTEF . S 5 u 31863
Is Project being ADDED, ELE OtiiPLETED or A-MENDED (Circle One)
RoLte nr Street: C o rrm e r c e Wa y _
project Limit• (Post Miles if on State Highway l at :Iowa
neccriotion of Proieet: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder-how many ft., rehabliitation-of what) (If project is
°regionally significant' refer to Pg. 18, 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
New coinection to loNa../ ! -215 interciange.
If this project is being amended. plMe list
RTIP # S gD 31853
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) 1.35 8 -2 C O 5
Description of Amendment (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
Project deletion
Project Part of an Approved Congestion Management System? [] Yes [X; No
Expected Completion Date of Project?
LNSERT MAP OF PROJECT MERE
s
S&N BERtiA.R.DWO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
2000/01 Through 2005/06
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form
Agency: Grand Terrace Contact: P a t r i z i a Telephone: :0 9/8 2 ti -6 6 21
Materassi
A e Code: Dater t I-2 FazA�: • 309/783-7629
Project Description R'ITIp # s is D 55023
Is Project being ADDED, ELE OAIPLETED or A.wIENMED (Circle One)
Route or Sty Michigan ,
Proiect Limits; Most Aides if nn Crate lliph 2 1 f-o m i B a r t o n R d �c
Commerce Wav
Description of Project: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder-how many ft., rehabilitation-of what) (If project is
'regionally significant"refer to Pg. 18, 19 & 20 of the RTIP Guidelines)
Widen from 2-4 ',.banes, iicersection improve-nents at
arton and Michigan
If this project is inE-mended list ;
RTIP# 53D 55023
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) 0 9 8-2 0 0 5
Description of Amendment (what is being changed In this project) (from old to new):
r
Projezt deletion
Project Part of an Approved Congestion tii n�gem nt yein; f'J Yes [J do
i
` Expected Completion Date of Project:' r:!a
F\iSERT MAP OF PROJECT HERE
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVEIMMIENTS
2000/01 Through 2005106
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Submittal Form i
Agency: G'and Terrace Contact: M a :e a -ri a s s izia Telephone:
• 9 0 5/9 2--6 6 2 1
A e Code: Date: 1C � p• 905/783-7629
Pro-ject Description RTIP #: 'BD 55024
Is Project being ADDED ELETE 03'IPLETED or AAM"NDED (Circle One
RQUteorStreet: Mt_ Vernon Ay. f-)m Cara] S•, to Washington St.
project Limits: (Post M les if on State Highway)
Description of Proieet: (detailed-i.e. how many lanes currently exist and how many
lanes added)(If widening shoulder-how man? R., rehabilitation-of what) (If project is
"regionally to refer to Pg. is, 19 & 20 of the MF Guidelines)
Roadway reconstruct ;oi fc-r seismic safety .
If this prQaect is being amendtd. 12leasC Hct ;
RTIP 24
Which RTIP is project currently in (i.e. 93-99, etc.) 15 9 6 C 2 C 0 5
Description of Amendment (what is being changed in this project) (from old to new):
f Project deletior
eject Part of an Approved Congestion Management y-gem kl Yes [) No
Expected Completion Date of Project? . n%a
INSERT MAP OF PROJECT HERE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
11riul Dale:
rransit and State and Local
Developing or Adopted
SORT: BY SOURCE County: All p4'
System
<oject ID SBD31850 S Lead Agency GRAND TERRACE
oute 215 Source/FTIP OOFTIP Amend# . 0
Post Mile 1.30 Env. Doc.ND 06/01/03 Basin SCAB
to 0,p0 TCM Model#
Element FCRL County SAN BERNARDINO Change Reason SGH►-I 2�.
Program HE11 Description: Completion Date 07/01/05
IN GRAND'1'ERRACIs AT BARTON ROAD INTERCI IANGE WIDEN OVERCROSSING FROM 2"1'O 4 LANE
Yr Added 1992
Fund Name YEAR Eng. Cost RIW Cost Cons.Cost Fund Total
LOCAL
CITY 2004/2005 $180 1,718 $1.898
$1,898 Subtotal
XSBD 2004/2005 169 $169
$169 Subtotal
1 11 0 . 1,887
(Funds are in thousands of dollars) Total Cost: $2,067
Comments:
Page: 708 of 871
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA�= i OCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Print Date: 17/Jl/1 19
Transit and State and Local
Developing or Adopted A
SORT: BY SOURCE County: .All
System
Prof t ID SBD41287 I' Lead Agency GRAND TERRACE
Route SourcelFTIP OOFTIP Amend# 0
Post Mile 0.00 Env. Doc.ND 06/21/96 Basin SCAB
to o•00 TCM Model# T45
Element County SAN BERNARDINO Change Reason
Program TR21 Description: Completion Date
GRAND TERRACE MULTIMODAL TRA FER PT FACILITY REHAB.OF A VACANT 12,000 FT.COMMERCIAL
BUILDING AND PARK-N-RIDE WITI I 'ACES N/l.:CORNI R OI'I3AR'IT)N RD& MT VI:RNON
Yr Added 1995
Fund Name YEAR En .Cost R/W Cost Cons.Cost Fund Total
LOCAL
CITY 2000/2001 $110 400 490 $1.000
`G1,00t1 Subtotal
. 4911
�G
(Funds are in thousands of dollars) Total Cost: $1,000
t
Comments:
�� aG
----- -- -- - - - ---- --- ---- -
Page: 737 of 871
0
O
RTIP FY 2000/01 —2005/06 Guidelines �� a a' •�"
C Y
SAN BERNARDINO
T450 8 SBD41220 BONDL CHINO AVENUEICENTRAL TO 6TH STS 19991000 ND 19980800 NEW TIP 2000
SBDM MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER
INCLUDES PARK-N-RIDE LOT
WITH 125 SPACES
T451 V8 SBD41287 CITY GRAND TERRACE MULTIMODAL TRANSFER 19970200 ND 19960621 BASELINE 2000
PT FAQLITYREHAB.OF A VACANT 12,000 FT.
COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND PARK-N-RIDE WITH
57 SPACES
(WE CORNER OF BARTON RD AND MOUNT VERNON)
T452 8 SBD59253 SBDM METROLINK-INLAND EMPIRE 19991200 ND 19980601 NEW TIP 2000
LTF MAINTENANCE FACILITY-NEW CONSTRUCTION
TPD SITE IN SAN BERNARDINO AT RIALTO AND 3RD ST `<
THIS IS A JOINT PROJECT NTH MTA
73 FTA9 CAPITAL-PURCHASE OF LAND AND
LTF ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES&CONSTRUCT
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MAINTENANCE&OPERAT-
IONS FACILITY(PH 1&11)
VENTURA COUNTY
IN FILLMORE 20000600 ND 19990401 NEW TIP 2000
' INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER
IN DOWNTOWN FILLMORE ON MAIN ST
AT FILLMORE STREET
ATTACHMENT C
-- • • - 1 • •
7SE
031505 SANBAO 68
SOD HBO It
0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS-LUMP SUMS LTF 1998 0 0 768 782
LTF,ARTICLE 3 BICYCLEIPEDESTRIAN LTF 1999 0 0 782 782
PROJECTS
CITY 1998 0 0 375 375
SBD031580 LOMA LINDA SBO H84NL 0 AO NTERIN VIEW STATE 10
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS,OPTICOM
EMERGENCY PREEMPTION,INTERCONNECT
SOD031562 LOMA LINDA SOD H84NL 0 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE
CITY 1999 15 0 110 125
AT LAWTON AVENUE
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS,OPTICOM
EMERGENCY PREEMPTION,INTERCONNECT
CITY 1999 10 0 110 120
SBD031563 LOMA LINDA SBD H84NL 0 BARTON ROAD AT NEW PORT AVENUE
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS,OPTICOM
EMERGENCY PREEMPTION,INTERCONNECT
SOD31088 OMNITRANS SBD. TROA3 0 BUS FLEET EXPANSION PURCHASE 40' FTA988 1998 0 0 2622 2622
EXPANSION COACHES
&AUXILLARY EQUIPMENT,CNG A82766 1999 0 0 600 600
97-16,98.8,99-13,004,03-2 FTA9 1999 0 0 4555 4555
TSTA 1999 0 0 334 334
SBD31789 COLTON SBD H08 0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS-LUMP SUMS CITY 1998 12 0 108 120
IMPLEMENT CITYWIDE BICYCLE SYSTEM /-- 7
7 . laa
4 n ' CITY
SBD3 998 0 0 194 194
1854 GRAND TERRACE SBD HBBA 0 BARTON ROAD PLCUN
AT LA CROSS AVENUE LTF 1998 25 0 0 25
CONST.60 VEHICLE PARK 8 RIDE LOT
SBD31860 GRAND TERRACE SBD HBO 0 MAIN STREET
CITY 1998 8 13 66 87
MT.VERNON AVENUE TO W.CITY LIMITS TOA3 1998 8 13 68 87
PROVIDE BICYCLE LANES -
SBD31875 LOMA LINDA SBD HOSA 0 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE
xgFjD 1990 0 0 375 375
PROSPECT AVENUE TO VAN LEUVAN
AVENUE
ADD PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY TO OUTSIDE
OF BRIDGE -
i
cITr .
Aa
GRAND TERR C Community and Economic Development
Department
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM O COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: February 10, 2000
FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED
SUBJECT: Planners Institute by the League of California Cities in
Monterey
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Planning Commissioner Maryetta Ferre' to
attend the Planners Institute March 1 - 3, 2000
The League of California Cities is holding its annual Planners Institute in Monterey
March 1-3, 2000. This conference will address issues of particular interest and benefit
to the City and Maryetta Ferre', the newest City Planning Commission Member.
Community and Economic Development Director is requesting authorization for
Maryetta Ferre' to attend. Sufficient funds are available in the Planning Commission
accounts.
wA. ..Xplanning\cdWaryetta Ferre'planners institute 3-1-0O.wpd
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace.California 92313-Ct"tX)J jA ITEM NO,j F
i
CITY(OF GRAND TERRACE
Historical &Cultural Activities Committee J A N 2 7 2000
Minutes for January 3,2000
CITY CLERK
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Pauline Grant at 7 p.m. Those present were Pauline,'
Ann Petta, Judy McBride, Brenda Stanfill, Shelly Rosenkild, Colleen Edmundson and Hannah
Laister.
Secretary's Minutes: The Minutes were read and approved on motion by Ann,seconded by Judy.
— Treasurer's Report:There is a balance of$122.02 in Petty Cash and$921.92 in the Budget. Colleen
reported that the Birthday Party cost $165.10, which will be corrected as Judy and Ann turned in
more bills. A motion was made by Ann, seconded by Pauline, to pay Judy's bill of$67.30 for
balloons and helium.
Historical Report:Ann reported she is investigating the Thomas house on Grand Terrace Road and
Barton. She will try to find pictures and he will write an article. Dr.Bill Darwin will be interviewed
and we are waiting for Mayor Matteson to write his article on early history.
Birthday Party: Tony Petta gave a short history on the G.T. Market and the Weirs were presented
with a plaque. Mayor Matteson spoke about Vi Gratson, our former Chairman,and a plaque was
presented for her to her son-in-law and granddaughter. Judy reported that Vi was very appreciative
and has the plaque on her wall at the Terrace where she now lives. Ann reported that she was very
dissatisfied with the lasagna but that the ham was good except should be sliced thinner. Judy
reported that she did not allow enough time for decorating. Next year,we will have much simpler
decorations. A thank you will be sent to the men of the G.T.Fire Department for all their help. On
the whole, everything went well. We will inform the Tiny Tots of our date next year so there will
be no conflict.
Art Show:Flyers:No more sewer bills so Ann will start by phone. Applications were prepared and
these will be mailed out with the Chamber Newsletter. We will be sure it is on cable also. There
will be a workshop on Monday,January 24`h at noon to work on Art Show signs.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. The next meeting will be February 7,2000.
Respectfully Submitted,
Hannah Laister
Secretary
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.�6
i
i
U Y OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE J A N 2 7 2000
Regular Meeting
Minutes CITYCLM
November 8, 1998
The Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee met for the regular monthly meeting at the
Senior Center and was called to order at 1800 hours by Chairperson Philomene Spisak.
MEMBERS PRESENT:Philomene Spisak, Chairperson,Bitsy Bernor, Vice-Chairperson,
JoAnn Johnson,Dottie Raborn,Lewis Neeb, Jackie Kiacz and Claire McElwee.
CITY STAFF/SHERIFF'S DEPT:Tanya Cahill, Community Service Officer and Lt Pete
Ortiz
GUESTS PRESENT: Bob Stewart-Citizen Patrol
AGENDA: The agenda was read and appro-ed with a motion to accept by Jackie Kiacz and
seconded by Claire McElwee.
MINUTES: The minutes of the October 11 meeting were read and a motion to accept as
written by Dottie Raborn with the second being made by Jackie Kiacz.
PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no members of the public present.
CORRESPONDENCE: It was agreed by the members present that an ACTION ITEM be
prepared and sent to the Council declaring an opening on the Committee for a new alternate
member.
BUDGET:-It was reported that the Committee's budget remains at$14,050.00. It was discussed
that a separate ad-hoc committee be formed to decide how the balance could be best utilized for
the balance of the year..
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: The case regarding Senior Swindles that the Committee has been
addressing was further updated by Tanya CahM regarding calls being made to persons regarding
insurance against problems arising from the so-called Y2K"meltdown"predicted by some
unscrupulous individuals,basically requesting credit card information. How we should warn
people of such scams.
NEW BUSINESS:
ITEM# 1 Tanya Cahill reported that the Terrace Mesa Apartments now have a new name
called`Ibe Crest"apartments and that new management has been able to "clean
house"evicting undesirable and problems tenants from the complex. New lighting .
has been installed with new security measures. She also reported that the Highlands
Apartments reported no burglaries for the month of October which has been the
result of increased security.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO- ,
ITEM#2 Tanya plans on sending out letters to sponsors and participants of last years Grand
Terrace Days celebration and that a new committee be established to plan for that
date. Hopefully obtaining many of the same sponsors.
ITEM#3 Lewis Neeb gave an extensive report on the new class sponsored by the Sheriff s
Department called the Citizen's Awareness Program. He also reported that the
Citizen Patrol had completed 421 hours of volunteer time during the month of
October
ITEM#4 Bitsy Bernor reported that there has been nothing added to the Auto-Cad Program
and requested the Committee to approve the purchase of new ink cartridges for the
unit out of the Committee's budget.
Bitsy Bernor made a motion that the meeting of December be canceled-as some
members would be absent during the holidays.. The motion was seconded by JoAnn
Johnson and it was approved The next regularly scheduled meeting would be on
January 10,2000.
ITEM#5 Tanya Cahill stated that nearly all law enforcement agencies were going to be on
fiiIl alert during the celebration of the new millennium year. No one seems to
know what is going to take place locally but the Sheriffs Department will be taking
all safety measures.
There being no finther business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 1915 hours.
Respect submitted,
RICHARD ROLLINS
Recording Secretary
7
January 26, 2000
CITY OFGRWD TERRA,CE
JA N 2 7 2000
CITYCLERK_
City Council
City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace, California
I hereby submit my resignation from the Crime Prevention Committee, effective immediately,
due to health reasons.
Sincerely,
Jackie Kiacz
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N0.5�}2b
L1Ty .
O
BRAND TERR c Community and Economic Development
Department
STAFF::REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Z-99-011E-99-05 Circulation Improvement Fee
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance
At its meeting of December 9, 1999, the City Council considered the adoption of the
Circulation Fee Ordinance and continued the matter so that a few Council Members'
questions could be researched and answered. Please refer to Attachment A for staff report of
December 9, 1999.
Since then, staff researched and addressed all City Council questions; mailed a memo to City
Council Members with clarifications on January 10, 2000. Should City Council desire an
,additional copy of the memo dated January 10, 2000, please contact Pat in the Community
and Economic Development Department at 430-2247.
City staff also extended the survey of selected cities in the Inland Empire to cities adjacent to
Grand Terrace. Please refer to updated results on Table D, the last page of Attachment B.
Again, the proposed Grand Terrace fees are very compatible with fees of other cities.
At this time, staff feels confident that the approval of the proposed circulation fees as
proposed is in the best interest of the City of Grand Terrace residents, businesses and its
future generations.
Recommendation:
Move to approve and adopt the Circulation Fee Ordinance with respective Negative
Declaration described in full in Attachment A.
Attachments: A- Dec. 9, 1999 staff report with resolution and neg. dec.
B - Craig Neustaedter's updated memo of Feb. 2, 2000 with Table D
wA. . .\planning\transportation\Circulation Improvement Fee 2-10-00 CC Report.wpd
22795 Barton Road - Grand Terrace, California 92313WQf QMQ9AV ff0A ITEM NO.
'(i\ /C1T y
GRAND TERR c Community and Economic Development
Department
STAFF REPORT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X ) MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1999
FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
SUBJECT: Circulation Improvement Fees
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance
Background
The City Council, at its meeting of January 22, 1998, approved the Circulation Improvement
Fees/Program in concept and directed staff to draft an ordinance with the following
recommendations:
1. That fees for low and medium density residential be balanced and easy to adr-hinister,
2. That fees reflect the source of traffic impact of future development; and
3. That retail fees be evaluated in view of the goal to increase retail tax revenues.
Proposal
Staff has incorporated all City Council recommendations in the revised fee program. Three
sets of fees were developed. The first set is for the commerciaUndustrial area east of 1-215,
which is designated District A. These fees will cover the fair share contribution for traffic
impacts throughout the City due to development of this area. Fees raised in this area would
primarily cover the cost of the Commerce Way extension. The Circulation Fee Program
includes five major land use categories.
The second set of fees is for new development in all other parts of the City or District B.
including the Barton Road Specific Plan area and residential areas. This set of fees is also
based on a fair share cost allocation formula. Residential low and medium density fees are
similar and easy to administer.
The third set of fees will cover the cost of traffic signals and is proposed for all parts of the
City for the five major land use categories.
22795 Barton Road •Grand Terrace, California 92313-529-; Attachment "A„
Retail Fees Reduction:
In order to address the third recommendation of the City Council, it is proposed that the
retail fees be adopted as one half (Y2) of the amount listed in the Circulation Improvement
Fee Analysis. This is in order to not discourage retail uses and be compatible or lower than
fees in surrounding cities. Trips included by retail uses are income generating and can
therefore offset a portion of the circulation improvement costs. Please refer to the Fee
Comparison Table below.
For detailed information regarding the Circulation Fee Analysis please refer to the
Transportation/Traffic Engineer's memo, Attachment B. Our Transportation/Traffic
consultant, Craig Neustaedter, will attend the meeting.
Fee Comparison
Circulation Improvement Fees
Survey of Circulation Improve ent Fees of Selected Cities in the Inland Empire
Jurisdiction SFDU MFDU Retail Industrial
1000 SF Acres
GLA
Perris $2,190.00 $1.314.00 $ 880.00 $ 4,792.00
Fontana $1,517.00 $1.138.00 $2,580.00 $11,228.00
Redlands $ 47.00 - $ 28.00 - $ 717.00 - $ 195.00 -
$ 435.00 $ 266.00 $6,699.00 $ 1,828.00
Rancho
Cucamonga $1,710.00 $1,026.00 S2,565.00 $11,173.00
Yucaipa $4,497.00 $4,497.00 $ 669.00 $ 7,294.00
Grand Terrace $ 730.00 - $ 730.00 - $1,040.00 $ 4,780.00
(Proposed) 1 $1,330.00 $1,330.00 $2,710.00 * $ 8,780.00
* Fees equal to one half(Y2) of technically recommended fees.
Fees include Circulation and Traffic Signal and have been rounded to the nearest $10
Recommendation:
Move to approve and adopt the Circulation Fee Ordinance with respective Negative
Declaration described in full in Attachment A.
Attachments: A- Ordinance and Negative Declaration
B - Circulation Improvement Fee Analysis Memo
wA . .\planningltransportation\circulation improvement fee report 12-9-99.wpd
I
2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER TO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT FEE
AND A CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE
WHEREAS, an increasing level of vehicular traffic within the City of Grand
Terrace is causing increased traffic congestion and delay; and
WHEREAS, this results in economic loss and a lowering of the quality of life for
the citizens of the City of Grand Terrace; and
WHEREAS, existing funding is inadequate to ameliorate of problem; and
WHEREAS, new development creates additional traffic, thereby increasing the
problem; and
WHEREAS, on December 9, 1999, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
conducted a public hearing on the proposed establishment of a Traffic Signal
Improvement Fee and Circulation Improvement Fee and duly considered all testimony,
information and data presented to it;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does
hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Add a new Chapter to establish a traffic signal improvement fee
and circulation improvement fee, which shall read as follows:
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT FEE AND
CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE
A. Purpose
B. Definitions
C. Traffic Signal Improvement Fee
D. Circulation Improvement Fee
E. Use of Traffic Signal Improvement Fee
F. Use of Circulation Improvement Fee
G. Capital Improvement Program
H. Fee Waivers or Fee Reductions
I. Fee Adjustments
A. Purpose: The City Council has found and determined that new
development in the City of Grand Terrace increases the amount of traffic utilizing the
City street system, thereby requiring the installation of additional traffic signals and
street improvements at specified locations to increase or improve transportation
capacity, in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare and that such new
development should pay its fair share of such improvements.
The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First it is to provide for the imposition of
fees for each new low density residential unit, medium density residential unit, retail
commercial area, industrialfwarehouse acreage, and office professional area; said fees
to be placed in a specially designated fund to be utilized for the purchase and
installation of traffic signals at specified locations. Secondly, it is to provide for the
imposition of fees for each new low density residential unit, medium density residential
unit, retail commercial area, industrialfwarehouse acreage, and office professional
area; said fees to be placed in a specially designated fund to be utilized for the
improvements to streets as designated by the City Council in order to increase or
improve the carrying capacity of such streets to solve current and proposed traffic
congestion.
B. Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words, terms,.;
and phrases shall have the meaning given in this section:
(1) 'Low Density Residential Unit' is descriptive of a dwelling unit within a
residential development having a density less than 3.6 dwelling units per,
acre.
(2) 'Medium Density Residential Unit' is descriptive of a dwelling unit within a
residential development with a density greater than or equal to 3.6
dwelling units per acre.
(3) 'Retail Commercial Area' is descript8ive of a retail commercial
development measured per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area.
(4) 'IndustriaUWarehouse Acreage' is descriptive of an industrial/warehouse
development measured per acre.
(5) 'Office Professional Area' is descriptive of an office professional
development measured per 1,000 feet of gross floor area.
C. Traffic Signal Improvement Fee. A traffic signal improvement fee is
hereby imposed on the construction of all new low density residential units, medium
density residential units, retail commercial areas, industrial/warehouse acreage, and
office professional areas in accordance with the schedule of fees that may be
established by the City Council by resolution. No fee shall be assessed on any City,
County, State or Federal government use.
F. Use of Circulation Improvement Fees. A special Circulation
improvement Fee Account is hereby established and all fees collected shall be
deposited therein.
Circulation Improvement Fees
Low Medium . Retail Industrial/ Office
Density Density Warehouse Professional
Residential Residential
(Unit) (Unit) TSF-GLA (Acres) TSF-GLA
District A $1,250 $1,250 $2,560 $8,230 $2,220
District B $ 650 $ 650 $ 890 $4,230 $ 990
All revenues raised by the imposition of this fee shall be applied to the design and
construction of circulation improvements in conformance with the City's General Plan at
the locations identified on Exhibit B.
G. Capital Improvement Program. Within one hundred eighty (180) days
of enactment of this ordinance, the City shall adopt a five year capital improvement
program that prioritizes the improvements to be funded by these fees. The City shall
endeavor to review and update the Capital Improvement Program annually.
H. Fee Waivers or Fee Reduction. The city Council retains the right to
waive or reduce fees for any new development. Fee waivers are strongly discouraged.
In order to waive fees, the City Council shall make a finding that the waiver or reduction
is in the short and long term economic interest of the City.
I. Fee Adjustments. From time to time the City shall review the fee
schedules and make adjustments, as appropriate, in consideration of changes in
construction and right-of-way costs.
Section 2: Adopt the respective Negative Declaration.
Section 3: Effective Date - This ordinance shall be in full force and effect at
12:01 a.m. on the 315' day after its adoption.
Section 4: Posting - The City Cleric shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in
three (3) public places designated for such purpose by the City Council.
Fees required by this chapter shall be paid upon application to the City for a
building permit for any construction which adds a low density residential unit, medium
density residential unit, retail commercial area, industrialfwarehouse acreage, or office
professional area to any parcel of real property within the City of Grand Terrace. No
building permit shall be issued until the fee is paid. Computation of the amount
required shall be made by the Building Official or a designated representative.
D. Circulation Improvement Fee. Circulation improvement fees are hereby
imposed on the construction of all new low density residential units, medium density
residential units, retail commercial areas, industrial/warehouse acreage, and office
professional areas in accordance with the schedule of fees that may be established by
the City Council by resolution. No fee shall be assessed on any City, County, State, or
Federal government use.
Two circulation improvement fee districts are hereby established. District A shall,
encompass the portion of the City bounded by 1-215 on the west, Barton Rd. on the
north, Michigan on on the east, and Main St. on the south. District B shall encompass
all other areas of the City.
Fees required by this chapter shall be paid upon application to the City for a
building permit for any construction or major remodel which adds a low density
residential unit, medium density residential unit, retail commercial area,
industrial/warehouse acreage, or office professional area to any parcel of real property
within the City of Grand Terrace. No building permit shall be issued until the fee is
paid. Computation of the amount required shall be made by the Building Official or a
designated representative.
E. Use of Traffic Signal Improvement Fees. A special Traffic Signal
Improvement Fee Account is hereby established and all fees collected shall be
deposited therein.
Signal Improvement Fees
Low Medium Retail Industrial/ Office
Density Density Warehouse Professional
Residential Residential
(Unit) (Unit) TSF-GLA (Acres) TSF-GLA
All
Districts $ 80 $ 80 $ 150 $ 550 $ 120
All revenues raised by the imposition of this fee shall be applied to the design and
construction of traffic signals and supporting infrastructure at the locations identified on
Exhibit A.
Section 5: rst read at a regular meeting of the . ty Council of said City held
on the 9m day of December, 1999 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular
meeting of said City Council.on the 13" day of January, 2000.
Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
And of the City Council thereof.
Attest:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace
and of the City Council thereof.
I, Brenda Stanfill, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 131h day of January, 2000, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
wA. . .1planningltransportationlcirculation improvement fee ord 12-9-99.wpd
Table B
COST TO CONSTRUCT ARTERIAL SIGNALS
City Responsibility:
Fraction: Dollar:
1)Barton @ Grand Terrace 1.00 $150,000
2)Barton @ Palm _ _ 1.00 $150,000
3)Barton @ Honey Hill .1.00 $150,000
4)Michigan @ Commerce Way 1.00 $150,000
5)Mt Vernon @ Canal - 1.00 $150,000
6)Mt Vernon @ DeBerry _ 1.00 $150,000
7)Mt Vernon @ Van Buren 1.00 $150,000
8)Mt Vernon @ Pico 1.00 $150,000
Sub-total $1,200,000
'25% Design&contingencies $300,000
Grand total — -- $1,500,000
I
I
Table A: Circulation Improvements to be Funded by Fee Program
Street: From: To: Total Share Distribuition
Cost District A District B
1 Barton Rd. , SP.R.R. 1-215 Overcrossing 0.0792 0.246
$928,125.00 $73,507.50 $228,318.75
2 Barton Rd. 1-215 n.a. 0.167 0.293
$1,800,000.00 $300,600.00 $527,400.00
3 Barton Rd. Honey Hill Dr. N.E. City Limits 0.0738 0.3894
$895,312.50 $66,074.06 $348,634.69
4 Michigan St. Barton Rd. Commerce Way 0.4924 0.2345
$105,437.50 $51,917.43 $24,725.09
5 Michigan St. Commerce Way DeBerry St. 0.4417 0.2725
$152,812.50 $67,497.28 $41,641.41
6 Main St. S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. 0.667 0.1609
$56,100.00 $37,418.70 $9,026,49
7 Main St. "650 ft. west of Michigan Michigan St. 0.1701 0.5188
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
8 Mt. Vernon Ave. Pico St. Raven Way 0.0099 0.1722
$92,137.50 $912.16 $15,866.08
9 Mt. Vernon Ave. Barton Rd. 700 ft north of Minona 0.0296 0.7011
$134,625.00 $3,984.90 $94,385.59
10 Mt. Vernon Ave. Grand Terrace Rd. 300 ft. south 0.0296 0.7011
$242,875.00 $7,189.10 $170,279.66
11 Mt. Vernon Ave. Canal St. N. City Limit 0.0296 0.7011
$485,000.00 $14,356,00 $340,033.50
12 Commerce Way 900 ft. North of De Berry Pico 0.8314 0.0681
$1,051,750.00 $874,424.95 $71,624.18
13 Commerce Way Pico Main St. 0.8314 0.0681
$1,730,850.00 $1,439,028.69 $117,870.89
Total: $7,675,025.00 $2,936,910.77 $1,989,806.32
l
G
Community and Economic Degel6pmtnt
Departmc-t
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
Traffic Signal and Circulation Improvement Fee Ordinance
APPLICANT: City of Grand Terrace
i
LOCATION: Citywide
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS:
Based on the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will
_f have a significant impact on the environment.
Patrizia Materassi. Director Date
Community and Economic Development
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 9_;13-5295 • (909) 824-6621
City of Grand Terrace
ComrnLni:y and Economic Developrrent Departme-t
Economic Checklist_Eorr�
1. Project Title: Traffic Sigr:al and Circulation Improveme i; Fee Ordirarce
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Grand Terrace
Community and Ecorom c Cevelopmen-
22795 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, CA 32324
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Pa',r;zia Materassi
(9009) 824-621
4. Project Location: Citywide
S. Project Sponsor's Name & Address: City of Grand Terrace
Comminity and Econ:mic De:elcpment
22795 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
6. General Plan Designation: Not Applicable
7. Zoning: Not Applicable
B. Description of Project:
This protect involves irnolerrenting a C'.tywiCe Traffic Signal Irr prc,.emont Fee
and Circulation Irnprovernent Fee for a!i new residential, coma ercia', and
industrial development within the City of Grard Terrace. Monias collected from
.these fees wilt be used by the City to construct traffic sigral a c' read�vay
improvements requirec as outlined in :he CxcLlatior Element (1:)da19 3.tudy.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: Vanes Citywide
10. Other,agencies whose approval is required: None.
D.tsr:a1Lt30ra
(Ta be complMd by the Lead Agency.)
On the 461 of this initial evaluation
l Ir"the tl�c Prod Pro}ezt COULD NOT}.eve a significant ef4ct <r. t}e e won rant•
had a NEGATIVE DECLARATION w-ll be prepared
1 find that although the
proposed prajec: mould have a rgrancant cffec• )n the
evironrneat,there will not be a sigailicm! effm in this case be host th a m it)gat:-n
alca u"3 dexribe-d on an anaa.ed sheet have Seen added to:?a prcjer . A NEGATIVE
TI
DECLARAO;�'will be prepared.
0 1 find that the MPosed Mject IMAY have a significant efrect on the er-•trerrr,rnt• and an
ENv1ROINMENTAL 1,%eACT REPORT is regsim
O !find thet sync c sed ;
Fr PC pro,ect MAY dare a signiEcant of cc:(s,oa the ettvironmznt, bu!
at least one c`FeU l; 'us been adequately analyzed in an earlier docurncat:o applicable
legal AL.)dwds, ald 2)ha. been addres.lcd by az t-
a tstioo ncasues bra f'on ;he e:U!ier
t'•atysis as..escribed on �}�shies,i!the effect is a" - 1cant '
or"potentially significaw, Unkss mitigated." A,i EtiN IRO k t'�TAL 1 MP c f �pect'REPORT is ntTjired,but it trust ans:yzr only t le effeti is chat re-male to le adders sed.
O I find that &Jftt;gh the ro sed
P Pil project could i^ave a sig.0 Ic t effect,,n :he
environr M there WILL NOT be significant effect ir this case Secaise f,11 potentivly
sig ficattt effects(a)have been a.+ta;yzed adequs!ely in an ea '.ier EIR to
—" aP?liable vxdards and(b)ha,-c
inc hid,ng revisiotu or tnitigaticn rxarues t5atderern�ttg pu:�lant to:'w earlier EIR,
Po .e pre Dosed pre."ect.
Sigr�tiue - _
Date
Stgnatt.rt; -- _ i
For
i
i
i fer-oei;,od Sepp4tt Iaforaurioa Sources): -
Pottalially Pote all,l! lae !}ie V3
ISg 't,422t Sitalfk.nt S1t1.1nunt Irnpset
te�pstY L'ib (nIpetet
Kupt:74
1scorpor ae4
1. Laad Use aad PlaaaLt. Would the propcssl:
ai Conflict with germl plan desigjauon or zonng? p
� O
b) Contict with applicable environnicn4l y!ans or
policies ado ptsd by agencies with jurisiicUon over the
project?( )
c) Be iwompatib!c with existing land use in the rcinity?
O
d) Affec: agricultXal rtrsoW=or opt:raL
0
imps.-•�•b lolls or fu-n!ands,or impacts from
LWOCTitible lard rises)?( )
e) Disrupt or divide the pby sical wngement of as
atabl:shed community(includiag a low-irtcorr or
mit:orty commt:aity)? ( )
A bref explarsoea to ttnsurot I:
Discrision in a separate box....... iras is a joined ccll and will be used fcr tht:di-;cuss!or Ior-:on ,f the
!a'tia: study cotMnmg the mspormd tc the for:.entioned question
11. PcpvLttiom And Eotutag. Would Lk proposal: i
a) Ctbn-�tily:zcoed official rcgio;aJ or:oca1
Popu:86on pmjections?( ) 7 :)
b) 'r dt:ce s'+rt al g Owth in an area eishe:3ira;;y cc
rdirea!y(e.g.tllmutth Projws in an cZdcveknped area
or ertewioo of major ir. ()
ci Jispls:.e existing homing,especial:y affe.dable p
housing? ( ) _)
A brief explutioo to L-jvtr I,:
I73e project....... M
t
Apr 19 S9 09: 26p Janie Si�ee^ey
. ,,: . . ( SCSI 926-4Z25 p. o
*Itvtl(tsd Sopprl lsforssdees Sourced: - -
i Potentially F��entuUl L.r•tA•� Na
51{slAcsnt SZaiftcs•i c•.i"ks.t
fanpset t:nlces m set ?+?•et
�ia!FtaSOn F
I8,c►p.orsted
III Ceobric Probkms. Woad the prcpcsal "W1t in or
expos: people tc potential imp;j ia�olrtg:
a) Fault
Votmd sh&a:? ()
c) Seimrrt9c Vvjnd failtm,imlweiai liQue cation?O r> 5k
d) Srche, tst:rarai,or volcanic ham-6? () O ?
e) Landslides or mud&vn?
f; orosio4 char,�q sa to J
x�ry or tansah;e soil U �
conditior>, Sm cxcawtioa,-s'1d;;tg,or iul? ()
3) Subsidrxs of the 'and? {)
h) Exwjivr soln
�) L%que geolote or physics,' feat.,,M?
A brief explaauion to answer
7be proj eet......
i
IV. water. Vould the proposal resnh in:
a) Ch"C3 in obsorbtion rues,dr a.`.
late aced amount of surface rjofr()terns,or the
b) Expose to people or propertytoKater related Itawds
Ao
- ' 3-wh a odiq? O `1 7
c) Lisclja a into sta!tax xtt I
g a or ot<+e:n.,cra cn of J r3
s'irfut w'ater Qualiry{e.g.:tarrperstur,� d lre�
Oxygen or tirbid-;'tY)? ,$ ,
(1
11 C!'.a:Zes �n -he momt of s� a�ur it L-Iy Water
may? O
1 e; C'�aga is ctmmts, or else co',ase,-r direrica of•; ter �
t) C`yartga is tfY q ity of ground• r.2.3,either thro,4h
1' di.-ecl addition or witbdrawals,or wougb irtene;tUon
Of an aquifer by etro or exc4%&dow,or throu�y
substuttial loss of FCUn&,Vter and -se capabhry? ()
s) Altered direction or rue of Low of a
FWU to lrct:rdwaw q•xaty?
i) ()
SL>�iatial r6duelion i J
fs A amMO=of 3rourxtwarn
athemiu available for
public water slap?ues. ()
A b-rief czrlertsiaa to gnawer N:
Pou,
'r latersetios Soxcea): Potentially Sign'S a ti 4 r. than Na
'tsae+("ad 511"*
Si=Lt!xsst ��.fcaaI S ,a ficael ,r„pact
Impact L:!rx Impact
M�!�ati�n
lacor�ortted
1 V. Air Qaatlty. WOWd the proposal:
Vi �' d or contribute to ao
a) o'.ate any au qua.tty ssu�dat
exist or prejetted air quality viclatiots?
b) Expose xasitive rticeptnrs to Polluurts? ()
c) Alta air rsloveme.Mt,maisnue. or teMperalure,or raise O
any cue iD clictau? ()
d) ctc=objectiorWbe odors? ()
A bt:if MPLLOA600 to aasacs V:
The project
Vt. Trse"rudovCuvilarkm WOU;d ttie proposal result
i in;
a) increaxd Vtbicle dips or iraafie c-ongestron? () 0
b) Herstdi to safM 5=design f`n"t=(c-g.,sharp
ranks or dangaow inte:'sections) or ir*ptable uses
(ag.!.m egwpmeat)? () _
c) InA*uate ernergexy ecrt:as or access to measby Uss= � •:
i
d) Linfficieat Yatidn;caYacity ort-si:c or off-site? O C:
je) Huards or farrire for pe4esa ars or bicyc;ists?
f) Conflieu with adopeedd policies suppottLmg altermtive , 4
aaasporiton(e.g.,bus tur>,cuts.bicycle racks)? ( )
gl R Z waW orae w av a-LMic ir..r+ects?( ) :l 1
Bref expiaaacon tr LWVM V1:
Tie Project.....
nor v P va Qv
JF
tsrsa 'i d Sspp-zrt larcrsaCcs Soorm): Po'rititll) i;teatlafy a u this vo
Sicalfrunt Sgaihtar S I tifkam in pan
Ioptct l_nbMI Ir+paci
SIn upt.08
le;erpors d
Hiologt¢al R-uctrM Would the proposal "is t in
Impw1i t0:
s) E.r Mierred,I>sr xned, of rare species or their Wiuu 0 > O �
(including but aces limited to pljA% ftsh.• irlsttts,
animals, and birds)? ( )
b) Loc4ny designated spec ics (e g.,bezitage tier)?
c) Locally designated natural commwzti s (e.g.,oa1< 0
f0rerl, eoutal lsabitate.eu.)? ( )
d) 'Wetlmd habitate(e.Q., rrwsh,nparar, and verns•1
pool)? O :>
( )
e) 'Mu dlife dispersal or ariptor.:orr;dom?
Brief expleattim to L-JV' •VII:
7bc pmj=L.....
VIII. Eaer=y &ad Mfunl Resonrcec 'Would tie proposal;
Ia) Conflict with ado;ud tuTTy cwtuniaion pl&w?
b) Use reso-x"-s in a•*rtefnl and
inePbcieat m3a=7 I
c) Rtsuh in the Iestti of tva:lability of a know-3 mineral J ] ;� •,� I
" rtsa+.=the wcuic'be of fescue-.-a]ue to the region a.-d
' c :esidc=of the Stffie? ( )
Brief rxpIL-,Won to answer VIII:
T c psoj ees .......
DL Hs—rds would the prcpcsal izw•olve:
a) A risk of acci&mW explosion or mleaw of�Azardous 0 ZI r)
subsuwe (imIudin&but not limited to:oil,pesticides,
:hc-.aical:,or rbdiation)1 { )
b) Possible imteiftrtttie with CEW8exy rtaporse.plaa of 0 �l
enw.I cy evacssst m plan?()
c) Ibe cttatio�n of my health}•.card or potential health
rsurd? ()
I 3) Exposure of peopk to existing so=ces of potential ] .1
1 heal b ht.zAtds? { ) .
ej Irn:ra�t fbrz haaard in arau -*ith flamrns!�le br--.h,
fuses, or trees? ( )
G.Jr-
Issues(&ad Sri?"- ;ofora•tie�S,>� ); _
)o�entialb Potca•i�tb 1e7�tturw �
S�S�Scrat Sqa�<Iat Si ga&JIM •
lap•n (:al.y�
Im Pacy
Brief expl tacorycrited
t. on to u1•.�r :
'he project...... I
Y. Yoise. wwd the mposal rtsult sn:
I i) lrcttaae in cxisti^g rise kwelsT ( )
�) Expaatnt of.;X c- k to severe noise !e-.cls?
Br.ef:Y??trstioa to trjwer X
77k project......
X1. N l5c 3+t+ e. Wog,d the proposal!Ia�e LA cAr--A
=Fad o<resti}t ir. s oeed for mm or aJtered Qoti•emarenc
sen-mes ;x nay of the fozlov-iq that:
t) r:re protacfm? ( )
b) Police pm actioe? ( ) J
c) Schools? ( ) :2
a) O•�, o see of pv'o(ie facilities, inch reads?( ) > D D
8-ief c:p:tra>son of
71e project....
-XJ1. Utitties U d Seryirft Sr,to ma. V4,OU!d the r'
result In t Ued for xv►sv P."�osal
t akernatiors to the`�bv�;;�i��pl%es, or subsanb>J
I tl Peer or:s:6-w EU? ( )
I b) C-smunic&6OM D = D
D
I c, Laea7 or regioril Lur treatIneat of disVibution
d; Sewn of st-
.4tc •srtt? ( )
e) s-a:-m w•a,er Geir�t:? ( ) D D r
4 So Ed waste diapoaal?
8) Local or regroag wv"supptirs?
8r'cd txr'='e40 Of C'Ur+es X11.
� � 7
T-A M*t......
mpr its uzS: JUP Jamae .-Si tiere 19,091 926-4025
P.
Brief explanation of answer XI(d)
I„c'2,.,e�ta�lor of the propcsed Traffic IrrPact Fee stricture wT u't:^ .i!e!y re_u:t :n tt-e
ccrstructior of add t or.a. -oars ana :raf`,si5na!s Routine Ta,rt=-ra ice of t,�ese
strLctLres •hi;l be :.ne -esporsibility of the r:ty s Public Works divisor
Brief explanation of answer XII(e)
- As rew road sections ar'e built a^d ,nod'fed under the propcsed ordi-arce. storm
cram structures will be added and upgraded to accommodate the ad-:tiona: runoff.
:396rs(esd Sapport laforoetoe Soma): Poteetiallr Poteattely all tea. yo
Sitnificaet S:=a;fxaat 545friicant
Imp*" L'a1*-a :mace
�1i:!=atw:a
rnto•}oreled
K111. .AesxbcdeL would the proposal:
a) AfTed a setaic vista or scenic Nomly? ( )
b) Htve 1 demonstrable negative a_&qthe�j.eP:eet?; )
c) Cry light or glare?
Brief explanation to atuwa)011.
The project.......
XIV. Cnitar%J Resources. Would the p-oposai.
a) Dism6 paleontological resoarcts?
b) Dish am utolog:cal.re•curces? ( ) J
c) A!T'ect historical:rxurts? ( )
d) Have the potential to utx a pbysical c`mge which
uotJd aEM wt que ethnic cultzal.al;ra? ( )
e) Qestrlct existing religious.or sacred uses%ioi%D Je p ] J
paierTtia! impact wvs? ( )
Bnef mpltut}oa to w we:r)C1V.
73e pmjem....
XV. Ritrerat*a. Would tie proposal:
al lacrum the deaand for neighborhood o.—mVonA
aa.•ics or other reCM40ue1 faCilit:ts? ( )
b) kffect existing rec..mtoral oy+po:tuaities'' ( ) O ;] ] >y
Br.ef c%PLVAL;Ca 10 etuwtt XV.
ibe project ......
npr to » p Jane ._ee�e � .. 193SI 526 - 4ZZ5 p . '_ 2
Brief explanation of answer XIIKc)
As rew traf is sigra!s a,e tom. It u^cer the crcecsed ordinance scree, 'i-t'ts r.•;, t e
irsta 'ed per Itne city"s sta.ncard pla,)s creatIM9 adL!tional light sourc:s.
o
+ Inaa(set UP"M Takrtsdea Snrces)- Potoatiaft Potere:Ifly Lrsi etas Ve
SitaiScaa: S.��Acset Sl��dksat ;wp.ee
rrnpatt t'sk>s !npacf
Nu3arl7a
l ece rpo PI U4
XV1. MaadatOry AAdjW Of 11ptfejA0L
a) Does the project have the r+olcnral to degrade the J 7
quality of tax envircrinera,substantially reduce the
h mtau of a fish or wildlife species,Cave a fish or
wt:dlife population to drop'xlcw sef Sure ur:g i
{cvt f.thtgtea to clia;inau t p:Wst Of mi.'nal
coratnunit;,redum the ,i=ber or restrict the,-sage of
;ere Of eadaagered plant or a.=sJ,CLIMLxte rrpot3a.�t i
ez es of the� major perode of Califcraia history or �
prrhittat7l
b) Doet the project love the po:e�tial•r sc)ueve short- 7 7
term to the d:sadvasage of long-term,eavi.ronmet w
goals?
c) Does the project have M. pecis tuu1 are individWy 0 J J
iirrlt4 but c=.mulaovely u=i6 able?
CtN=Mmlatively cocsidcmbk"trxaas that the
incvmental eBectt of a Project we Considaable u!ien
vie-aid in ecrreetion with the effects of sect projects,
the efrecu of otlxr cmt pm ecu,and the elfccu of -
other probable bmm projects.)
d) Dooa be project have enNirvament,d cfrccu Ah cb will
cease gubv&%W adverse elect on beings,
eitlxr direcOy or ��y?
Imes(I I'd Sappat Ilk teraatiea So-arm): poteotlauy Potential r test t2wa No
Sipirksat Sallnitkstd Sigr:Gcast input;
twpset L'nles� Impart �
lecorpora+ed
X V I I. Urtirr Asap da.
Earlier saa,lysis rrAy be sx� wrbcre, ptasuant to the turng,
proparn EIR.or other CEQA process,one or more efkcts
have been adequauly aaaiy-zed in as cuiia EIR•or negativt
de::aration. Section 15063(c)(30). in phis case i discussion
sho d identify the fe4owing cot era,:W sbcc•s:
a) Earikr aaslyrb used. Identify c&rUer aulyses and
State where ttxy ve %v0Bbk for re-tiew.
b) Impiety sk;ttcty addraxd. Identify wtt ch
c$t,vu bvm A Above Checklist welt within,& wope
of`&M&&q=ly Ln yzad in an eulia dov ncm I
px%=to aprliabk legtl A&ndat&, s-d sate
whether suet:efrcets went addrtsstd by mitigation
rxssed x the earlier aaa,ysis.
I '
c) MidSZts&S Is asnre,a, For effects that are"Las chid j
Signlf c It wi:b MWI stion Imor;*takLt•"de5crlbc the I
rrutiganoc mumazed which vrae ircorporatccd or i
- refined from the carsr doctaneat and the mcni they I
a.3i-M ate rjecific zoaditiors for the project. i 1111
FM xx City of Chwid Ta-ace '
Commuruty, a5d Ets-,wjc Dcvelopk a Dept
.ucrisy %hIc 14=re C:ik Somew 2 IM tad 21047 i
We---ces.F'.IDbc 1tnoww Ca&Scc*m 21otid d 2IM 1.1!OW-3.21-At 1.
;1�3.:lOi3.3,2lC93,21751,I:tSI,Sa+>aom r Cowq:!Ke�docx+o.2D2
CAL.tpp 3d 296 09etl LsweR r Nc e&e e7 Eerd of supervisae.n Cc!App 34
1337(149Q►
P. 2
Brief explanation to answer I
The project will W.-erate fees to fund construction and ccmpletion of components of ft
City's circulation element of rie City's General P'an The project is 1-OC% consistent
with the City's General Plan anditrefore w+11 have ro significant impact.
Brief explanation to answer u
The project will have no impact on popu'aUon and housing in the City of Grand Terrace.
Improvemerts to be funded by the fea program -ry 3 not disp!ace any existing housing,
Brief explanation to answer III
The fee program and improvements to be constructed by the fee program wall have no
significant impact on geological conditions.
Brief explanation to answer N
The fee program and improvements to be constructed by the fee program will have no
impact on drainage or water quality. Road improvements to be funded mll be designed
to preclude any impact that can be attributed to runoff.
Brief explanation to answer V
The fee program and improvements to be constricted by the fea grog-arn will have no
significant impact on air gLality.
Brief explanation to answer VI
The project will have no significant "mpact on tra^.sportat cn/arculetion. Traffic
congestion and safety will be improved as a result of the roadway construction and
circulation element improvernents funded through this fee program.
Brief explanation to answer VII
The fee program and improverents to be constructed by the fee program will have no
significant impact on biologics;resources.
Brief explanation to answer Vlll
The fee program and improvements to be constructed by the fee program will have no
significant impact on energy and mineral resources
Rpr 21 99 C4 : 571c ubl � c ;.-,4-oaks. - 7' '`''
509- 413 -3170
Brief explanation to answer IX
The fee program and improvements to be constructed by the fee program wi l not
involve gene,atiN ary hazardous conditions.
Brief explanation to answer X
The fee program and improvements to be constructed by the fee program will have no
significant irrpact 3n noise levels.
Brief explanation of answer XI(d)
lrrp;e—,enta:;cr, of the proposed Traf is Impact Fee stricture w.l' ultimately result in tl•e
constriction cf add-tional roads and traffic signals. Rowine mair.terance of these
structures -W-1 be the responsib,lity of the city's Public Works d'vision
Brief explanation of answer Xll(e)
As rew road sections are built and modifed Lnde� t~e proposed ordinance, storm
crain structures wilt be added and upgraded tc accommodate V e additional runoff.
Brief explanation of answer Xlll(c)
As rew traffic signals are bui't undgr the proposed ordinance, street lights will be
installed per the cty's standard plans creating additional .fight sources
Brief explanation of answer XIV
The fee p,og-am aid irrproverrer•ts to to ccr.str"u,:.ed by the fee program will f ave no
signifcan; i.^'pact on cu,tural resouroes.
Brief explanation of answer XV
The fee program and improvements to be corstru=ed by the fee program will have no
significant impact on recreation
Brief explanation of answer XVI
The fee proaram and imprcv-ements to be cost-u ed by the fee program offer no
mandatory f:nd;ngs of significance.
TEP
P.O. Box 16355 Phone/Fax.
Irvine CA 92623 949 552 4357
Revised February 2, 2000
To: Patrizia Materassi, Community and Economic Development Director,
City of Grand Terrace
From- Craig S. Neustaedter
Subject: Circulation improvement Fees
Per your request, I'm providing the following information for Council_ review concerning
circulation impact fees. For the Council's.review I'm submitting the following:
Table A - circulation improvements to be funded by fee program
Table B - arterial intersections warranting future signalization
Tables C1 through C3- signal and circulation fee analysis
Table D - survey of circulation fees for selected cities in the Inland Empire
Comparison of Proposed Circulation Fees with Fees from Other Ciities
was able to find comparable fees for five cities in the Inland Empire, which are shown on
Table D. The proposed fee for Grand Terrace shown on Table D is the combined fee for
signals and circulation improvements.
As indicated by the data shown on Table D, fees can vary significantly from city to city and
from use to use. Factors that affect fees include the following:
The cost of the improvements to be funded by the fee.
The quantity and mix of new development which will be paying the fee.
The quentity'of trips generated by new development versus the quantity of existing and
regional trips
The methodology used to calculate the fee
Redlands has a broad range of fees for individuai uses. For example, the fee for retail development
in Redlands varies from $ 3,406.81 to $ 11,676.04. This is because the City cf Redlands is divided
into six districts: the circulation fees vary from distr'ct to district.
Can the fee be based on the number of trips generated by new development?
The proposed fees shown on Table C1 through L3 are based on the typical daily vehicle trip
generation rates for major five !and use categories. It is recommended that new developments
in the City be charged the fee on the basis of units of development such as dwelling units,
Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Attachment T"
r G D—V G—V J ♦G • i V • i• r'.•i� -•a v - . i J.! V V J c...�-� �
if
square footage, or acres instead on number of trips generated. This is because units of
development are tangible and be easily quantified for the purpose of fee calci.lation.
What are the consequences of not adopting a circulation fee program?
The circulation element update study indicates that improvements will be needed which cost
over $ 7,675,000. This excludes the cost of certain improvements that may be required as a
condition of approval on new development.
According to guidelines codified in California Government Code 66000, new development can
be charged for the cost of infrastructure improvements in proportion to the extent that new
development causes the need for these improvements.
Table A shows the fractional share of the impact for which new development can be charged
for the circulation improvements that are necessary to complete the City's General Plan. A
maximum of 64 % of the total cost of the circulation improvements can be charged to new
development. This equals approximately $ 4,927,000. The percentage equals the portion of
trips generated by new development in comparison with existing and regional trips on the
City's arterial circulation system. The remaining cost of$ 2,748,000 cannot be assigned to new
development.
The circulation fee program is one of a limited number of options that the City can access to
raise revenues to fund the completion of its circulation element. If a circu,ation fee program is
not enacted, the City will need to seek out additiona' funding from Measure I, state and federal
programs, or the Genera! Fund.
i
Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc.
m
m
Table A: Circulation Improvements to be Funded by Fee Program '
rn
Street: From: To: Total Share Distribultion s
Cost District A District B
1 Barton Rd SP R R. 1-215 Overrrorsing 0.0702 0.2
$928.125.00 $73,507.50 $228,318.75 ,a
2 Barton Rd. 1-215 n.a. 0.167 0.293 „
$1,800.000.00 $300,600.00 $527,400.00 �
3 Barton Rd. Honey Hill Dr. N.E. City Limits 0.0738 0.380
$895,312.50 $66,074.06 $348,634.69 3
4 Michigan St. Barton Rd. Commerce Way 0.4924 0.2345 m
$105,437.50 $51,917.43 $24,725.09
5 Michigan St. Commerce Way DeBer y St. 0.44.17 0.272 r
$152,812.50 $67,497.28 $41,641.41 a
6 Main St. S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. 0.667 0.160 a
S56,100.00 $37,418.70 $9,026.49 C
7 Main St. "650 ft.west of Michigan Michigan St. 0.1701 0.5188
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
8 Mt. Vemon Ave. Pico St. Raven Way 0.0099 0.172
$92,137.50 $912,16 $15,866.08 T
9 Mt Vemon Ave. Barton Rd. 700 ft north of Minona 0.0206 0.7011
$134,625.00 $3,984.90 $94,385.59 z
10 Mt. Vemon Ave. Grand Terrace Rd. 300 ft. south 0.0296 0.7011
$242,875.00 $7.189.10 $170,279.66
11 Mt.Vemon Ave. Canal St. N. City Limit 0.0296 0.7011 u
$485,000.00 $14,356.00 $340,033.50 m
m
12 Commerce Way 900 ft. North of De Berry Pico 0.8314 0.0681
$1,051,750.00 $874,424.95 $71,624.18 v
13 Commerce Way Pico Main St. 0.8314 0.0681
$1 t 730.850 00 $1 439 028.69 $117.870.89 a
Total: $7,675,025.00 $2,936,910.77 $1,989,806.32
U
7
- v
1
FE£+-k71-0@ 1"L 16' FIm HPIEKIGRN ySRU.:!y.K PKIN,;T:I7NLi q0v 553 0643 P. 04
Table P. _
COST TO CONSTRUCT ARTERIAL SIGNALS
!City Responsibility: — —
_ 'Fraction: ---
1) Barton Grand Terrace 1.00 $150,000
2 Barton Palm
3)Barton Honey 1 AO $150,000
Hiil
4)Michigan(g Cemmerc_e way 1.00'. $150,000
5 Mt. Vemon Cana 1.00 $150,000
8 Mt. Vernon 0 DeBerry 1.00, $150,000
T)Mt. Vemon(�Van_E_u_ren 1.G0 $750,000
8 Mt. Vernon Pico 1.00, $150,000
Sub-total . .. . . ---.. ._._..---1 -------------
-----------__ . ._— $1,200,000
25% Desipn &contingencies _ $300,000
Grand total $1,SOa,000
i
i
I
i
I
r.
j(GRAND T_E_R"_RA_CE1—CIRC-ULATION ANo sioNAL FEE ANALYSIS
_J
•
F"Amlysis:Wo
liiihRATION
Jiri"- e!�i pt eq:,I Allocation Quantity:...._ I Parameter: Fee ARocation
I-+-- . ..__ Intercept� Adj� . _ _i * - , � —.1 . . ...
1 Factor: !per Unit
Lew Density Residential —15 D.U.'s 0.000425605
Medium Density Residential,—,---...,. 165! .00.. W 0.01 ID. Is
r
Retail 19094! 0-.7.5; ___--1_4_3.21T-- 0.001741631
IndustriallWarehouse 1.00i 3740! 0.20. 72.21,Acfe 0.002802141
'Office Professional140!; 1.06, ..!il!k -.0-,,0-1, _0.060-i-�-
Total: 23257"' " 18484' 1.00
J
.................
-Cost Assigned to NPw Development: $2,936,91 1
Fee- Unit: Factor: fee per Unit:
I Low Density Residential D.U.'s 0,000425605: $1,249.96
Medium Density Residential D.U.'s 0.001342509. $1,248.45
TSO��LA 0.00 1741531;. $5,114.72
indu3trialWarehouse Acre 0.002802141T -O3.220554.
JSF 0.000757432• $2,2�j4.51
__.qf!ke Professional
I
i
I
Table C2
FEE ALLOCATION FACTORS i .Circulation i4nprovement Fee Analysis:
District B —
IIntercept Ad usted. Allocaban Qua 4Parameter: Peo Atloca�on
�-.j. _ 1 n :. --
! -_....._. .... ._ Factor:
r Unit Factor:
�--__-----. _ _ 700.D.U.s 0.00032630�
Pe...... ...... . .
Low Density Residential 5502! 1.00; 5502i 0.23
Medium Density Residential I ! 4929! 62710.U's-- - - O.Oa0326355
- ----- -- -- --- _--.. - -- - - -
_ 0.35Retail 0.50 8466 +---- -3-4.5-1
TS F--G--L-A •--
0.00089081
indus— Wouse : T --
2792 1.00 2792, 0.12' 54.47;Arre 0.00212793
Office Professional - 2399� — 1.00; 2399j 0.10; 200.087TSF-GFA ! 0.000497767 i
Total: 32554: -- 2408& _ 1.00,—. - —.....{._.... .. .
;Circulation Improvement Fee Analysis -
•AllOtherDistricts
Cost Assigned to New Development: _.._...._ .. .._ _. $1,989.806
Fee: Unit: Factor: Fee per Unit:
Low Density Residential D.U.'s ; 0.000326304 $649.28 ;
t 'Medium Den Residential !D.U.'s ; 0.000326355. $649.38
Retail 'TSF-GLA 0.000690881: $1,772.68
Industrial\War'ehouse Acre 6A0212793' $4,234..' 7
Office Professional I TSF-GFA ; 0.000497767: E990.46
i
T
ad
'Table
1
Traffic soja�!k
0
i Motal Cost
$1,500,000 i i Local
trip factor: i 0.63993
0.4724,
FEE_ _Aa0_6A_TWWFFA&&q ovement
All Districts
T
rips: +Allocution !Quantity:
meter: as Allocation
Factor: by
-------- Use:
Low Density Residential D
1.00 -.1per Unit Factor:
Medium De rn
5094, 1.00: 'm
O-OG0185262
-U's
Retail 36026, 0.63 22786 j __j�� 1 H
0-�4. 839.39jTt#4DC___�____0000639 -
. Y.067 - . 757
use
In.du I Wa—r W� 6532
6532 0 D
Office Professional - - - 0.001215178 z
23W 1.00: - 64 ' '
_-.0--.0.00.2.6.91.2.1..
Total: —42432-- ----- --- 0'8'!T 'w�FA
T
T
Cost As"
Development:
z
------- 7---
--
Fee:
..........
Lo' W_
PerWResideWhil :, _.VW*+____*___. 6.660-1-852-7-2-4 $84.01
- 7-- --------- Jj-b
I_Me�urn Density Residential -- 4.01
....... ------1 - . _ ... . . . . ... . ._._. ...jD.U.S i 0.000185262' :6
Retail
_ ... .... ... . i.....- __1TSI _GLA 0.00W39757 $290.10
.1ndustriallWarehouse -1 - ._ _._._._.,.-o- . . . 4-,,--__$�S+j_ , ,
Acre .06121,5178j
.03
.0thcA Professional T'�F-GFA "-0.000266121: $122.03
L
in
Table D
Survey of Circulation Improvement Fees of Selected Cities
In the Inland Empire
Jurisdiction SFDU MFDU Retail Industrial
1000 SF GLA Acres
Perris $4,958-00 $3,338.00 - $1,020.00 $6,425.00
$3,550.00
Fontana $1,517.00 $1,138.00 $2,580.001 $11228.00
Redlands $822.90 - $501.97 - $3,406.81,- $3,432.21 -
r $2,820.30 $1,720 38 $11,676.04 $1 i 763.10
Rancho $1,710.05 $1,026.03 $2,565.08 $11,173.00
Cucamonga
Yucaipa $4,858.84 $4,858.84 $723.21 $7 836.32 1
Colton $2 563.50 $1,563.74 $10,870.27 $19 457.82
Loma Linda $2 434.00 $1.808.00 $405.00 $6 348.87
San Bernardino $166.90 $101.80 $690.97 $696.11
(City)
Grand Terrace $730.00 $730.00 $1,040,00 $4,780.00
Citywide
(Proposed n.3.
Grand Terrace $1,330,00 $1,330.00 $2,710.00 $8,780.00
CommerciaV j
Industrial Area
j(Proposed) O.A- Ij
j
i
i
..
X
STAFF RE;POR .. ......................
GROMPI R C
CITY MANAGER ' S DEPARTMENT
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: February 10, 2000
SUBJECT: RECLASSIFICATION OF THE HOUSING SPECIALIST POSITION
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED xx
The original Housing Specialist left this position in May of 1999. Since that time we have utilized
temporary personnel to work in this capacity. It is now time to look for someone to fill this position
on a permanent basis.
I
This program has been in force since 1993, and duties have changed through the years. Staff has
rewritten the j ob description with the inclusion that a Bachelor's Degree is required and changed the
title of the position to Management Analyst. The change in title should allow us a broader range
of applicants. The title of Housing Specialist might indicate to applicants that they must have
experience in this program and this is not the case. We are looking for a generalist that can handle
other projects assigned. We are not asking for a new salary range. We are going to use the old
salary which is $2,154 to $2,918 per month.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT:
COUNCIL APPROVE THE ATTACHED JOB DESCRIPTION AND THE CHANGE OF TITLE
FROM HOUSING SPECIALIST TO MANAGEMENT ANALYST.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.8A
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
JOB DESCRIPTION
Title: Management Analyst
Date: February 2000 '
Job Summary
Under the supervision of the Director of Building/Safety and Public Works, coordinates the City's
Low-Interest Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Purchase/Rehabilitation Programs. Manages bid
negotiations and contract awards relating to these programs which include coordinating loan
documentation and processing related to these programs.
kpical Duties
Coordination of the City's Low-Interest Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Purchase/Rehab Programs,
which includes providing information to citizens,processing paperwork,working as liaison between
the homeowner, contractors, realtors, and title and escrow companies.
Provide information and referrals to low-income individuals seeking rehabilitation loans; advises
applicants of eligibility requirements; works with homeowners and contractors in providing
information and resolving problems; receives and screens applicant information, determines
eligibility based on established criteria, establishes and maintains detailed project files; prepares
project work write-ups,processes payments for contractors and homeowners; coordinates transfer
of funding at escrow company.
Coordinates purchase of homes within the City for the Purchase/Rehabilitation Program;maintains
files,assists in contractor selection and processes paper work for all phases of this program. Works
as a team member with the Bldg./Safety and Public Works staff to specify colors and materials for
the remodeling and construction of residential housing.
Manage various projects and grant programs.
Performs related duties as assigned,such as prepare permits,armver phones and other duties within
the Department of Building/Safety and Public Works.
Essential Qualifications
Knowledge of guidelines in Low-Income Housing Programs: construction technology; basic
arithmetic used in calculating costs.
Ability to draft letters and create forms for utilization in the housing program.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Job Description--Management Analyst
Page Two
Working knowledge of computers and other office equipment;command of proper business English,
vocabulary and grammatical usage.
Ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing and to establish and maintain cooperative
working relationships with a wide variety of persons contacted in the course of performing assigned
duties.
This position requires regular and punctual attendance.
Must have a California Driver's License.
f
Any combination of education,training and experience that provides the required knowledges,skills,
and abilities;.a Bachelor's Degree with some general experience and knowledge of office practices.
I
I
I
I
/ f
LIT
r
'ATE Community Services Department
Staff Report
COUNCIL ITEM (XX) MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE SELF-HAUL PERMITS
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
DISCUSSION:
The City's Franchised Solid Waste Haulter, USA Waste of California recently
completed a comprehensive audit of all residential accounts within the City of Grand
Terrace. As the Council is aware, solid waste service to residential units is mandatory
based on the City's Integrated Waste Management Ordinance and the State Government
Code which requires that residential solid waste must be hauled from residential
locations a minimum of each 5 working days.
The only exemptions to the mandatory service are for self haul permits which are
granted by the City Council.
During the USA audit, some residences were found which did not have permits to self
haul and the residents have subsequently requested such. These residents were
requested to contact the City to request the self haul permits.
In reviewing the requests, the following criteria was used to allow the self haul permits:
4
1. Persons were unable to receive service from USA to their residence and they can
demostrate that they are self hauling their waste a minimum of every 5 working
days.
2. Persons owned a business where they were paying for a service.
Attached as Exhibits A and B are copies of the transmittal letter and self haul
agreements which outline in detail the self haul criteria.
Staff has received requests from 4 residences which are qualified for the exemptions.
These are attached as Exhibit C.
It is the intent of Staff to annually audit these residences for compliance with the
provisions of the agreements.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. ��
RESIDENTIAL SELF HAUL AGREEMENTS
AGENDA REPORT: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION: .
That the City Council approve Self Haul Permits for all names and residences included
as Exhibit C of this report.
FISCAL LMPACT:
None by this action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request to Self Haul Letter
2. Residential Trash Self Haul Agreement
3. Approved Self Haul Agreement List
�G„b►T rat
Commun;t\
G
anuary 7, 2000
Ms. Elsie Warren
22087 Newport Avenue
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
RE: REQUEST TO SELF-HAUL RESIDENTIAL TRASH
Dear Ms. Warren:
The City of Grand Terrace is currently in the process of reviewing your application to
self-haul your residential waste. Your request is being considered for approval.
However, we are imposing the following conditions prior to granting your exemption:
1. Self-Haul Permits are allowed at the discretion of the City Council and
may be revoked at any time. Code enforcement actions by the City for
accumulation of waste and/or failure to haul residential trash will result in
the automatic revocation of the Self-Haul Permit.
2. Residents and property owners will be subject to verification that they are
either self-hauling their waste. or legally dumping their residential trash at
another location. Periodically, verification will be required by submitting
current receipts from a local landfill, a business, or a
commercial/industrial establishment. If sharing a trash dumpster at
another residential location, a letter from that property owner will be
required.
Under the City's municipal code, it is a violation to accumulate and store residential
waste on one's property. As a matter of enforcement, the City will require proof that
waste be being removed a minimum of-every five (5) working days. Property ov:ners
are responsible for the maintenance of their properties and will be subject to code
enforcement actions for failure to adhere to this requirement. Fines of $75.00 a day
may be imposed for failure to properly remove residential waste from a property.
Attached is an agreement agreeing to these conditions. Please complete, sign, and
return this form to the City of Grand Terrace, Community Services Department, no
later than January 18, 2000. Your request for an exemption will be presented to the
Grand Terrace City Council on January 27, 2000.
If y have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (909) 824-6621.
S'nc re
Jo n W. Donle y, Jr.
As istant City Manager
Self-haul glr
"_79, Barton Road - Grand Terrace. California 92313-5 9i (909) 824-6621
City of Grand Terrace
aCE
Residential Trash Self-Haul Agreement
16h T
Date of Application
I am the ( ) Property Owner ) Renter/Lessee
Applicant's Name-PLEASE PRINT
Applicant's Mailing Address:
Street/P.0. Box city Zip
Applicant's Telephone:
Daytime Evening
Requesting Self-Haul Permit for:
Property street address city
Please indicate where your residential waste will be hauled to and /cr how it will be
disposed of:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
, the property owner of the abcve address,
acknowledge and agree that I am responsible for myself and/or my tenant(s) to the
following in relation to my request for an exemption from mandatory residential trash
service through the franchised hauler:
1. Self-hauling is allowed at the discretion of the City Council and may be revoked at
any time.
2. Code Enforcement actions by the City for accumulation of waste and/or failure to
haul residential trash will result in the automatic revocation of my Self-Haul
Permit.
3. 1 will be subject to verification of how I am self-hauling my trash. Verification will
be periodically required by submitting current receipts from a local landfill, a
business, or commercial/industrial establishment. If sharing a trash dumpster at
another residential location, a letter from that property owner will be required.
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace. California y'_; (9(:9) S24-662I
City of Grand Terrace
Residential Trash Self-Haul Agreement
Page 2 of 2
4. 1 understand that under the City's municipal code, it is a violation to accumulate
and store residential waste on my property. As a matter of enforcement, the City
may require proof that waste is being removed a minimum of every five (5)
working days.
5. It is my responsibility as a property owner to ensure the removal of trash from my
property and will be subject to code enforcement actions for failure to adhere to
this requirement.
6. 1 understand that fines of$75.00 a day may be imposed for failure to properly
remove residential waste from my property.
Date:
PLEASE PRINT—Property Owners Name
Property Owners Signature
Self-haul agreement.dociglr
Community Services Department
ILITy
O
GRAno TERR c
RESIDENTIAL TRASH SELF—HAUL AGREEMENT
AS OF 2/2/2000
COMPLETED AGREEMENTS
1. COLEMAN, James K. (owner)
12435 Willet Avenue
Grand Terrace CA 92313
(909) 783-2357
2. MARTIN, Ron (owner)
23019 Siskin Court
Grand Terrace CA 92313
(909) 888-4667 (909) 783-1705
3. WARREN, Elsie M. (owner)
22087 Newport Avenue
Grand Terrace CA 92313
(909) 825-0378
4. VALDEZ, Debra (owner)
23224 Westwood Street
Grand Terrace CA 92313
(909) 279-9011 (909) 824-3426
Completed Agreement Self-HauUgir
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92313-5295 • (909) 824-6621