Loading...
1991-05 r RESOLUTION NO. 91 -0 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TTM-90-04 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14868) AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Tony Petta has applied for approval of a tentative tract map, (Exhibit A) subdividing 3.17 acres into 10 residential lots located at the northwest corner of Victoria Avenue and Barton Road (APN# 276-411-02); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act. WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission r on November 06, 1990, regarding this application and continued indefinitely by the applicant, and; WHEREAS, the applicant in compliance with Section 66452.1. of the Subdivision Map Act, waived the fifty (50) day period requiring action by the appropriate advisory agency, and; WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 04, 1990, regarding this application, and; WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 21, 1991, regarding this application, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 3. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 4. That the design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration; 5. That the proposed subdivision together with the provisions for its design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the proposed subdivision, its design and density conform to the conditions imposed by this chapter, the regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of Grand Terrace. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that TTM-90-04 (Exhibit A) and the aforementioned Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) are hereby recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Individual lots shall be subject to Site and Architectural Review. 2. The subject property shall be dedicated to the City in order to be annexed to the City's existing Lighting and Landscaping District. 3. The Final Tract shall be consistent with California Aqueduct, Riverside Irrigation District and other legal easements. 4. All conditions as recommended by the City Engineer's Department in their recommendations dated February 15, 1991 (Attachment B's Exhibit C). 5. All conditions as recommended by the Forestry and Fire Warden Department in their Memorandum dated February 1, 1991 (Attachment B's Exhibit D). 6. All conditions as recommended by the Southern California Gas Company in their letter dated August 23, 1990 and August 30, 1990 (Attachment B's Exhibit E). 7. All conditions as recommended by the State of California - Department of Transportation in their letter dated August 23, 1990 (Attachment B's Exhibit F). 8. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside Highland Water in their letter dated August 21, 1990 (Attachment B's Exhibit G). 9. All conditions as recommended by the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District in their letter dated August 27, 1990 (Attachment B's �� Exhibit H). Submittal of an erosion control plan for approval. 10. All conditions as recommended by the County of San Bernardino - Office of Special Districts in their letter dated September 5, 1990 (Attachment B's Exhibit I). 11. The area containing the proposed slope in Lots 6 and 10 facing Barton Road shall be offered for dedication to the City for the purpose of inclusion in the City's Lighting and Landscaping District. 12. Preservation of the large pepper tree in the northwest corner of Lot 8, if feasible. 13. Victoria Street shall be widened to its fullest extent,whether dedicated or not, north of the center line all the way from Preston Avenue to the development. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a regular meeting held the 21st day of February, 1991 by the following vote: AYES: 5 - Vice-Chairman Buchanan, Commissioners Hargrave, Munson,Van Gelder and Wright NOES: 0 . t '�_✓ ABSENT: 1 - Chairman Hawkinson ABSTAIN: 1 - Commissioner Sims Dan Buchanan, Vice-Chairman Planning Commission ATTEST AC,14da :�*Imvjp `-Brenda.Stanfill,_ D Deputy Cif Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM John Harper, U City Attorney 1 i _ 1l.p IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERULE SAN M30WUIHO COW". CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT NO- 14860 �i '�'-"•' , •. �..••• - r BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT IA OF THE VISTA GP.,.I,E TRACT AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17 OF MAPS AT PAGE 10. „�,^�... F.••!.Y*•r�• ': RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' .......... .............. - .. i .... r•! .. .. _� • JUNE T990 SCALE: 1'- GJ' /' V I )- �3 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. ACREAGE AC 1 ,180• Idd! R/•/b-a ••I•.1 ........, ... ... _ '� 27e-411-002 1.9 ACRES GROSS I III ,VAC4/r ���� �i_�a;,a... .,.� .• mvr.:......... . _. L i :A4 `•��- r QFETd DEVELOPERM�I• Ar Ii.I \- 1 • 1 L ANTHONY AND ANGELINE PETTA ANTHONY AND ANGELINE PET14 III'_a;:•,T�,c,�-.ram.,,"" ••� ��� ! 1 � r ., 11873 EAtON DRIVE 11075 EATON DRIVE / �►- . GRAND tEPDICE, CA. 9232A GRAND TERRACE. CA. 92324 4 •►' /N, ` /�-� f�l , r ()IA) 625-B600 IItA1 B25-B60B ET6tNEEA SENCHNAM rat. �V 777 J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. F1-I4 TOP OF I' IRON PIPE !•EAq.•�L 1 ? \ :U�•11\ :• v'��1+: 1391-0 90UtM MT. VERNON AVENUE TAGGED LS 2722 AT f.F..viEPL;>�E (( r 4 + /,Q/.p�j. ,•� N• INTERSECTION OF GRAND :Ean.;E 'I "' ��' y� ilr A• p �' \ •. (?1A1825-10 22]2A ROAD AND BARTON ROAD. .ATtl 7AW 1 ��I ly, f• '4 �"'• / ELEVATION: 1153 :2 �y,Ivi��•'�`I ZONING UTILITIES I W _.1� 1{ IL_.1��AtC� •�'•% RI•I0, AIA ICULTURAL'OVERLAY ZONE ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CA �; • ' rJ�jAy I I •' _1 // GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATION- GAS; SOUTHERN CA. GAS SINGLE FAMILY RCS IOENT I AL WITH HATER: RIVERSIDE-•+I G.,LE-1; - 10.000 S.F. IN. LOT SEWER: CITY OF GRAND fE--n CE TELEPHONE: PACIFIC BELL . , I• A, / /,y�I EAg')OITS •I �4bC I�,A Ij.y'�-�. '�' /��' S .0 , VJ 1 EASEMENT FOR WATER DITCHES AND PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF EAST lI '_ e I R7/l'7 / 11" /y\y RIVERS[OE IRRIGATION DISTRICT PER OEEO aECOROEf] NNE 2L :2;:' b 1 \ V; '••1. F ►mom.,; f 7/n / / � ",L1�r COUNTYK 2A0, PAGE 161 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAN BER- 0;•�C T of 1 S '•1•A .''�. EXACT'LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSEO OF RECORD. lam' J� .�t .T• SV f• A: , A 2 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF MILD BAKE`; =FP •' �i / r,- (L•�-S A DEED RECORDED MARCH 18. 1909 IN BOOK A32. PAGE 2S6 J �..=:5. AEC OROS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. ,A V )1� EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED Of RECORD. F ` 7.VEIN / I 1; t11An anrti. '^' •s �. 7: `-� 3 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES AND DIVERSION BOX IN FA',OR JF JdM A, PONLO, Et UX PER GEED RECORDED MY 30, 19+d Iv 8CCA E270, PAGE 187 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERN.IROIMO .JUNTY • I I 4 `_ — .ttrwa// / EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. I • `�..1fII'�4'T"�� L 8• I ', `/ / / O EASEMENT FDA PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF THE STATE OF CAL IF:PN;A I / / PER DEED RECORDED MAY 0, 1970 IN BOOK 7439. PAGE 200 OF 11 �- �. - yOMIl.MXW® '✓ — `�,-� / /,flrt � OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. nvp ' - "�"`;'• (PLOT TED) �_ • i'K 1 l b ^� 0�1 /' i' TDAPOPARY L44pmENT TO BE VACATED TRACIOEO �On,W4�. I AP...t��Cpt/Tf.�L I II � :�f�fZ. ��1 i�i � \ `. V T /•` .' A f�^..Q'SQ+'MJAc I \ ? 1v9 frAiyy rl :F�t�;CSPJ' . f�:1"I''1-! ``:'' c✓ / j A;3a/i.-7s •1' IoreTw/1.r11g1foEA•.. LE OEM 44 I�I'I �`�.r�.•).3%� .WawsA►mnrauw�.E ' �~'M�'s w-t EX:STINO CONTOUR ~ �1'� V©_ XISTING SHAUB/TREE EXISTING BUILDING wM A" a Ap.• •Ty �. �, .ti1.• —�� EXISTING WATER MAIN , �, _.� FXISTINO SEWER LINE• - —�— EXISTING GAS LINE '' _ JIAECTIDN OF FLOW #}f. fox �aj., A'wlVt f�1? Z� I I�V�AT �t Al FtNISM SURFACE .w SOUARE FEET PR BUILOSED PAD DING SETBECV.K LINE o— ESTIMATED 100 TR. STORM FLOW TYPIGI.SECTION TYPICAL gQ um VICINITY 040 � 2.1 SLOPE �� VICTORIA 13 rj LOT LOT +oT 19•r,.lE 6,f/PWIC 6CMC M01 T1 ICY,( MDt 10 9CYL W •, �YEC T/O�/ D 4-1��Tj- Planning GRAND TERRACE Department NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: T IM 90-04,a Tentative Tract Map 14868,and E-90-07(Environmental Review)subdividing 3.17 acres into 11 residential lots of 10,000 square foot minimum in a R1-10 zone district and Agricultural Overlay Zone. This project is within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Tony Petta LOCATION: N.W. Comer of Victoria Avenue and Barton Road (APN# 276411-02) Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace (714-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this.project may do so prior to September 26, 1990 . All comments should be directed to David Sawyer, Community Development Director. �_ _ 9- 2 D 0--�� avid R.Sawyer, Date - Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace HR IT . 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,-California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621 • 1 Plannin- RAn TERRCKE Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT TTM-90-04,a Tentative Tract Map 14868,and E 90-07(Environmental Review)subdividing 3.17 acres into 11 residential lots of 10,000 square foot minimum in a R1-10 Zone District and Agricultural Overlay Zone. This project is within the General Plan's Low Density Residential landuse designation. APPLICANT: Tony Petta LOCATION: N.W. Corner of Victoria Avenue and Barton Road (APN# 276411-02) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: Based upon the atached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. David Sawyer, Date Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace mcmJ. 77795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Background 1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director 3. -Date of Environmental Assessment: 4. Agency Requiring Assessment City _of Grand Terrace To/v% P€`iTA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable ' 6. Location of Proposal: Al, VJ. aY - i M i D -I-WMW .SrieEET25 ll Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions. or in . changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements,, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? c. Substantial change in topography or _ ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical,features? e. Any substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or or off site? . . _._ .. •. --•-- --"----- --- -- -- �---------_- sue—-- - __ - Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a .river or stream or the bed of the ocean or -any bay, inlet or lake? 1� g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. ' Air. Will the proposal result in: , a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture; or temperature, or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? 1� 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial changes -in currents., or the course or direction :of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Subs-tantial changes in absorption rates, drainage .patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of-surface water in any water body? . e. 'Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water qual- ity, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or - turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of.ground waters? `..T"i'_'ti:k=L'LX:�::,._.-..._..:. -:...r-..;`^-_-.5,.,�+_Y n..-r�7-:..-. _-::.Y:�1-'liar_;. _- __R.`_` _ = i:•_._-.Jr_s�n1'v'�f'..i�'��'X--.^ -- - r � - Yes Maybe No �f g. Change in the quantity of ,ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through inter- ception of.an aquifer by cuts or excavations? �. h. Substantial reduction in the. amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flood- ing or -tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered -species of plants? c. Introduction of new -species-of plants into an .area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- k ment of existing species? d. Substantial reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of-any species of animals (birds,. land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or-insects)? Ic b: Reduction of the numbers of any unique_, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Deterioration to existing fish or - wildlife habitat? X --. - - x'i.`ri-i.� w+r.'z.+Y11 r`.'..���'.i+-"i..y�'�`4L�L'_�• . _��.+�� `_.. `''�- . 7"'- '::A � _�.�...-�r�r+t'v,.•3iYI Yes Maybe No G. Noise- Will the proposal result in. a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to -severe noise levels? T. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce substantial new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk -of Upset. .Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x b. Possible interference with an emerg- ency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the.proposal alter the location, distribution, density,- or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Yes Maybe No b Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Substantia'l impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to-motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have -Substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational faci- lities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. -Other govierinmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result -in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or. energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or re-_ quire the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new -systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? -- Yes Maybe No b_ Communications systems? c Water? f� .d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? — f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding — mental health)? b. Exposure of people to -potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the .proposal result 'in .the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site .open to - public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon 'the quality or quantity of-existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeo- logical site?. b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? ' c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? j� Yes Maybe t o d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance_ a. Does the project have the potential . to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, -cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten Ao eliminate a plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the .major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environ- mental -goals.? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which oc- curs -in--a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project's impact on .two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant..) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substan- tial adverse effects 'on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a, NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi- ficant effect in this case because the mitigation .measures described on attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on- the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 'REPORT is required. David Sawyer Planning D-ir-ector --(T° Date Signature / For.Ci-ty of Grand Terrace III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION, 1. b, 3. b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovering of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing proper drainage methods which will be reviewed and approved by the Building and Engineering Department 6. a There may be an increase of noise level during development to a site that is currently vacant This impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental Analysis for the General Plan. 8. The existing land use will change from vacant land to low density residential uses in accordance with the adopted General Plan. -- 13. a The future development of 11 residential lots may result in the increase of additional vehicular movement This impact will be within the allowable limits set in the Traffic Circulation Element of the General Plan. . A i 1 i i f I YIJ +1A �i;�'.i•�1�� ll(�11.Y . i1��l I C w...... .. ' I I ♦ f., Ad•.. r• uXwwAvw A14pc� THE CITY OF GRAND TMVU= eco I SANNBERAARDINO CONTY, CALIFORNIA �., ..�...'. .... f.-;...-.�..-.: utler I , _,�• BEINDNTATI�VEOF A TRACT NO 14 OF THE 14868 �.M1•',r:•n••r,•17-r.-+• """•••••• TRACT A9 GAINOE SNO BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 17 OF MAPS AT PAGE 10. RECORDS OF SOONAN BERNAROINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .................•J' — I I.I + .••.•• • JIVE 1990 J-44 .� SCALE: I'• 60• �+•�• I� . I I, ,/ ... ,ki....... .'•"••''• • •� .CT �.1 J 1.1o. ASSESSORS PARCEL fO. ACREAGE Ri-ia•A � / 0 ,YACdVr /'.• ♦....•... .•.•••••. /I�... 270-4lt-002 !l. ACRES GROSS NTcaar I X •,� `/r /I��II ••, \ ` .s+d+++i9:7•. DEVELOPER �.. aA ��•,�^ �_�� ` r j I =••L ANTHONY AND AGELINE PETTA iF:•�I•- -�"•'• `� B EAT ONDRIVEANBHONY AND ANGLE INE PETiA f ` ,[-�• tf SEA 0 if 7S EATON CRIv +/ Mr I AOlI� / (,/• ` �`. A � GRAND TERRACE, CA. 9232A T 17141 ORANO TERRACE. [A, 92721 ,i I�♦ �}Q ' � /I '�. � 171.1 B2S-060B BEMCHPAAK VJ r-Wft ENGINEERI Ii�� >IA7e4 iT1 1Y K'0.+ �i i t,J�ly\\♦1.•♦• .,,�/ / J.F, DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Fl-14 TOP OF f' ;SON oIPE ,�� '\ -2 Il 1091-D SOUTH MT. VERNON AVENUE fATGRSELT"N22FATRCE.v 1'EIRAC '.. r R/ ••. ID7Lt i182 CA. 2272A i 4 N E c t o B ,/1Mf 7ATAWr w'1I. I �. ` .Q \+' ROAD AN. BARTON ROAD. IL iy" I .rY. ♦ �p� ELEVATION: 116.3 02 IIW ��I I.1 1•-�JFI 1 I 7w1I!niu.cwb�,.l ...j A 201IIO.. UTTLITIES I I. VI IL— L—jnL�-J RI-10, AGRICULTURAL OVERLAY ZONE ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CA. EOISJN I �,� • , I L., '' / GENERAL LAN.USE OESIGNATION- GAS: SOUP NERN CA GAS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH HATER: RIVERSIDE-n[GNLANu 'W .:9I{'A• a' ✓ a •�•nr .� / f0,000 S,F. MIN. LOT SEWER; CiTr Of GRAND ;Enaai;E - If/. 'Q AK 1, I :A,}Yp 1/ /� •-/ J� TELEPHONE: PACIFIOft C BELL 'ftwa r _ EASEMENTS 6 ` ��'� 1.wfwT�. �' I ^Z�.:JA'•. /,?7/[> 1 EASEMENT FOR WATER OITCHES AND PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF EAST RIV BOOK ASIDE IPA IGATION OIStRICT PER DEED RECORCED .1VNE •1, .d•7: IN , PAGE f8f OF DEEDS. RECO c RD OF SAN BER•+AAD:NC S OUNTY. /• Ah J ��IM• EXACT LOCATION IS NOT OISCLOSED OF RECORD, - II !'"'�- �I ICJI ♦1 "�'� ,/ �' A,' / / •5/ Y 2 EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES IN FAVOR Of MILO SAKEQ=FA DEED RECORDED MARCH 16. 1902 IN BOOK a32. PAGE 296 dF C I W \`�•ti RECORDS OF 5AN BERNAROINO COUNTY. �"'' t III / L A .; _f y / ( )�•} EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORO. Ii (1/OA''R� RnflAr - J 3 EASEMENT GDR WATER PIPELINES AND OIVERSId/00X IN FAVOR OF A�//7Jd4doo JOIN A, AONCO, ET UX PER DEED RECORDED JULY 30, I9n0 iN OL'OK 2270. PACE 1B7 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARD INO :;,LINTY:EXACT LOGTION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. l �♦� A� f� I i , r E J • .IA d // i I O EASEMENT FDA PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF THE STATE Of CALF-]AN!, ` '�L / f `��n PEP DEED RECORDED MAY B, 1970 IN BOOK 7.179, PAGE 200 OF __ ._. ���� �'_� lOT , �.Y� J ,/.` /.IAItI /Iq (PLOTTED OF SAN BERNAROtNO COUNTY. ,Qj / I Ann II I I AP .gEjQQQf//J/L!/�•.�V�J1•f��it: +A n _� V ;+. /' •+` BET�ID WHENMAGLCEMOE ACO6 plyMq TERI�•CE rIJrS,;�.Ll.I I i \' T / ./ ! Aft P•,��1/k OVED. A r' DI �.A `•I'�• `• •• A•.' /�r M 1. Q 8-SN2 Sl IS 1NI>r '•1 :?• \ / / ,•1Y1.8,13.5/ 7•i9 . /�Aww,II.A.'IplfErl`' LEGEND 44 ~�'�+'��+� w�... EXISTING CONTOUR AlIlliffal 4'tISTING 9N{iuB/TREE EXISTING BUILOINO �1P 'b' �'• •D' d �jy —w� EXISTING WATER MAIN n' •' I •b' —A� E%IST:NO SEWER LINE• �— F,XISTINO GAS LINE I.fly I 1 r' I s/re �_ .,RECTION Df FLOW ' T�' •�? t[M Ip� R � A' SOUAAE FEET URFADE • i1 rit r BUILDING SEOSED TBACK LINE o— ESTIMATED f00 TR, STORM FLOM fYf+No T BEQTION MICAL'JECTIAB ----T1 fAAP = 2:1 SLOPE JI FI llM+..n IA+•..w....^1�► VICTORIA STREET LDT•A• lto f• aT TO K—c G,T,gyy,1-K,yf -IFa MOT f0 ONtt MOT TO 1.•..• u.a.evT w•�K.v. . .1' �• � �QF INN H�iaY IM II...�.trs 56xc r/o,/ ////�///7 W.O. 12-1 . 1063 Gj3RND TEZZ(YCE M E M O R A N D U M 22795 Barton Road TO: David Sawyer, Community Development Director Grand Terrace California92324-5295 FROM: Joseph Kicak, .City Engineer Civic Center DATE: February 14, 1991 (714)824-6621 SUBJECT: T.T.M. 14868 Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval for subject tract map: General Comments: Byron R. Matteson Mayor 1 . Victoria Street and Lot B (street within the subdivision exceed the maximum length of a single point access street, however it is my Hugh J. Grant understanding that Fire Marshal approved this as temporary measures Mayor Pro Tempore with condition that temporary turn around facilities are provided. 'Jere Carlstrom 2. Drainage from Lots 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 is tributary to the north, to a �t.Christianson privately owned parcel . Provisions to accept and convey that Herman Hilkey drainage to a public right-of-way without erosion must .be made. Council Members Thomas J. Schwab Recommendations: City Manager 1'. Victoria Street Current width of Victoria Street paving is approximately 20- feet and in very poor condition. This street provides the only access to the proposed subdivision. Portion of the run-off from the subdivision is tributary to Victoria Street and therefore must be contained within the public right-of-way of Victoria Street. (a) Construct curb and gutter on the southerly side of Victoria Street, 18 feet from street centerline. (b) Construct standard. roadway in Victoria Street from the lip of _gutter to a point 10 feet north of street centerline. (Design TI=6) 2. Lot A and B (a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of.-way. (b) Construct curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. EXHIBIT _ C. Memo to David Sawyer February 14, 1991 Page 2 (c) Construct standard roadway between curbs. (TI=6) (d) Dedicate roadway for turn around facilities to accommodate emergency vehicles and construct roadway, for that purpose, as may be required by the fire marshal . (TI=6) 3. Construct standard sidewalk. 4. Install ornamental street lights. 5. Install sanitary sewer to serve all lots. 6. Show proof of :paying off the sewer assessment. 7. Obtain approval from State of California, Department of Water Resources' for all proposed construction within D.W.R. R/W. 8. Provide drainage study and adequate drainage facilities based on that report. 9. Submit grading plan for the proposed subdivision. 10. Pay all capital improvement fund fees. 11 . All utilities shall be underground. 12. Street name(s) shall be approved by Historical Committee of the City of Grand Terrace. 13. All improvements shall be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City. JK/ct '�i R r SuL LCT _K-9 :)ArE f Le 0 SIG M, SIGNED DATE 45 472 SEND PAM I AND 3 INTACT - POLY PAK (SO SEM AWA72 ....... PART WILL SE RETURNED WITH REPLY. EXHIBIT D -FM IESTRY AND Fffi r-V IDEN DEPARTMEN_ ;OUNTY OF SAN BERNAF.DINO Fire Protection Minning Sarvices • County 6ovemcnent Center 3R5 No. Arrou•hcod Avenue, First Floor OFFICE OF PUBLICcci rr , � • Swn E3ernnrGlno, CA 92Cc13•rJ1R5 (714) 367-4212, 387-4213 ( / FLOYu T!L`J:LLI, i�ircccr �S'. II��,.-�,=�� �� — _ EMERGENCY SERVICES . -, .•.,•+• ..."�17�����+�•r� . -- #.s�vrz -�9�v..zts��_ �� � Novembcr 6, 1990 Oak rs,:r, Isic'. . 8:9 i mvl City of Gray:. a�L i��.2 it..•.,u 1.•.!.•I..i!':!.:: 22795 Barton Road ��!! •;;,,,;,,,,,,;, Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324-5295 Cl: ..!t:,,,::.; Tei4 C,:v eel:rekL4.,:. Attention: David R. Sawyer Community Development Director !•Inyc•>e!!Aapi«Y Re: TTM 9 0-0 4/TR 14868 .*rp,,-t Tony Petta I have reviewed the revised tentative tract map for the above project. This plan does not comply with the fire f!•,v�s� i_a<< department conditions sent to the applicant on September 14, iirl.•.trt�.•- 1990. The proposed plan is not in compli.anbe with the following fire department conditions: 1 �1.,�..ua: "F-6. Prior to final inspect or occupany the development and each phase thereof whall have two (2) points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations !CMi Lomb 1:114. as required in the development code." V-0,11i "F-8. Prior to final inspection or occupancy a turn- LsMe Cfeek around shall be provided at the end of each roadway, one- Ketouime hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be M.:w•cai::v:,:.,,ter••, approved by the Fire Department. Cul-de-sac length shall not M(NoAizGVa%-.) exceed six-hundred feet except as identified in the md,c;!.•,; development code and approved by the chief." OA- f!,,,.• Tentative Tract 14483 to the north of this project was PWPArVan: unable to get easements needed to continue Vicotria Street to IIµ,;,,, Arliss which would open the access to this project at both MMU-IC-INY'n ends. This creates a cul-de-sac over 600 feet for this project. 'Another area of concern is the driveways for lots �`Y' i�'"'°!''-.�' 10 and 11. There must he a turnaround for any driveways over A"r.,,.;:• 150 feet. �,;,,,�,v,, •,�,l:.• The project is not acceptable as now proposed. Summit VaLly S ercly, Yr�.•..�t•. to.ty. 1 Mi i::: !� (Cwt Yucctr VlaiPy rnylee J es, in Fire Prot ction Planning officer apt] j��nt � ct.•.:.1... c..;-••.• G i .�tJ1?-(i' i7� ti��1:�:�.� :1...�.. t•t w.�?- i.a_• •::1'_•: •-.:. ',. - •• • a.. _'oa_' - �'�-- � !i:+ li nap}s• �. ...t 7r•.t..�� !.:.t.._ �':«.... f..:.••!. _._t=•- ca , FORESTRY AND FIRE. _--DEN DEPARTMENT _jUNnr OF SAN BERNARDINO Fire Protection Planning Services - County Government Center OFI=ICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY 38S No_ Arrowhead Avenue. First.Floor - San Bernardino. CA 92415-0186 FLOYD TIDWE i Director � 213 (7I4 387-4212, 387-4 \ ..,�,:;��:� EMERGENCY SERVICES limit Illy Date.; l The following ciraled conditions apply to your project. - . Fire Department Reference Number: TTh1 c- n-o(4 -1 The above referenced project is protected by the San ;_, -i— - Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden Department. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the appiicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current Fire Protection requirements. _ All new construction shall comply with the existing Uniform Fire Code Requirements and all applicable statues, codes, ordinances, or standards of the Fire Department. `- F-3 The street address shall be posted with a minimum of z four (4) inch numbers, visible from the street and '= during the hours of darkness -the numbers shall be low voltage internally electrically illuminated. . - Posted numbers shall contrast with their background and be legible from the street in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: Where building set backs exceed 100 feet from the roadway, additional contrasting four (4) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrance. • - 04 Prior to- final inspection or occupancy each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrester as identified in the Uniform Fire Code. -5 Prior to any construction occurring, all flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any flammable building material, including a finished - - structure. -6 Prior to final inspection or occupancy the development 06 and each phase thereof shall have two (2) points of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the development code_ 0-7 Prior to final inspection or occupancy, private roadways which exceed one-hundred and fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the Fire Department having -jurisdiction, and shall be extended to within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An .- access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet- of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road and the building is in excess of thirty .percent (30) . Where the access roadway-cannot be provided, an approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided, as required and approved by the Fire Department. -8 Prior to final inspection or occupancy a turn-around shall be provided at the end of each roadway, one- hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length and shall be approved by the Fire Department. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six-hundred (600) feet except as identified in the development code and approved by the chief. F-9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to grading and snow removal, shall be provided for prior to recordation or approval. Written documentation shall be submitted to the Fire Department having jurisdiction. Private fire access roads shall provide an all weather surface with minimum paving width of twenty (20) feet. F-10 Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow of this development.shall be approved by the Fire Department having jurisdiction.- The developer shall furnish the Fire Department with two copies of the water system improvement plan for approval and a letter from the Water Purveyor stating the availability of the required fire flow prior to recordation. Water systems shall be operational and approved by the Fire Department prior to any construction occurring.. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow." In areas without water-serving utilities, the fire protection, water system shall be based on NFPA pamphlet number 1231 and Uniform fire Code requirements. F-10 MS-IL3 THROUGH ILS Water systems designed to meet the required',fire flow shall be operational and approved by the Fire Department prior to any construction occurring. The required fire flow.shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the San Bernardino County "Guide For The Determination of Required .Fire Flow". In areas without water-serving utilities, or fire protection water serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall ,be based on N.F.P.A. Pamphlet Number 1231 and the San Bernardino County Uniform Fire Code. F-11 Prior to Building permits being issued approved fire hydrants and fire hydrant pavement markers shall be installed. Fire hydrants shall be 6" diameter with a minimum one 4" and one 2 1/2" connection. The hydrant and fire hydrant markers shall be approved by Fire Department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be 300 feet with the exception of single family residential which may be increased to 600 feet maximum. F-12 Prior to final inspection or occupancy this development shall comply with' Fire Safety overlay conditions as adopted in County Ordinance Number 3341. The development is located in Fire Review Area. F-13 . Prior to issuance of a building permit a fuel modification zone in compliance with county standards is required. F-14 Prior to final inspection or occupancy, an approved Fire Department key box is required. If automatic electric security gates are used an approved lock switch is required on each gate in lieu of the box. Questions and/or comments may be directed to the Fire . Protection Planning Section; County Government Center, 385 North Arrowhead, 1st Floor, San Bernardino, California, _ 92415-0186; or call (714) 387-4225. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, DAVID .J. DRISCOLL, Chief C ty Fire Warden By - Fj-zeZPro" cti' Planning Officer c: N U U 2 7 199CJ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA !gas COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 3003. REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92373-9982 August 23, 1990 City of Grand Terrace Community Development Director 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,CA 92324-5295 ATTENTION : David R. Sawyer SUBJECT: File No. TTM-90-04 , E-90-07 The division and development of File No. TTM-90-04 , E-90-07 will interfere with the free and complete exercise of Southern California Gas Company's pipeline easement. Southern California . Gas Company operates and maintains facilities within the bounds of the . subject area. Southern California Gas Company, therefore, must object to the recordation of File No. TTM-90-04., E-90-07 , until more detailed plans are available and satisfactory arrangements can be made with the petitioner. Please contact Mr . Roger .Baughman for arrangements at (714)335-7970 . Si ncere- � f en Soverns Technical Supervisor KGS:pat EXHIBIT E REG' ►,��. u'7 i9q�i STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 : ( iAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 fDD (714) 383-4609 Fd► August 23, 1990 08-SBd-215-1.3 Mr. David R. Sawyer Planning Department City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Tentative Tract Map 90-04 in the Citv of Grand Terrace Although the traffic generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic are to be considered. If you have any questions, please contact Tom Meyers at (714) 383-6908 or FAX (714) 383-4936. Very truly yours, HARVEY J. SAWYER Chief, Transportation Planning Branch B EXHIBIT :I= REC 2 9 , q" 1 1450 N'Jashin-ton Street Colton, California 92324 (714) 825-4128 q ' P P� August21 , 1990 City of Grand:Terrace 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324-5295 DAVID SAWYER Community Development Director RE: North west corner of Victoria and Barton TTM-90-04 Tentative Tract #14868 Dear David, Riverside Highland Water Company-has a 10" steel water main in Victoria Street. Lot 6 of this tract seems to have a slope on top of that water main. This could be a problem when the grading is done. To meet fire flows in this tract the water main will need to be extended north of the tract to Arliss then west on Arliss to Preston St. Maybe the developers of tract 14483 and 14868 could work on this problem together. Thank You. Sincerely, Rich Haubert Distribution Superintendent RH/kb EXHIBIT G CO, Riverside-C®r®na • Res®urCe C®nservaticin ®istric m a?n=?° U y 2023 CHICAGO AVENUE,1314 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92507 PHONE(714)683 7691 90�• �. .� CDHSER`1;"\ August 27; 1990 Dear City of Grand Terrace, We acknowledge receipt of the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for TTM-90-04,E-90-07 in San Bernardino County, California that was addressed to the USDA,Soil Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District on August 23, 1990 for review and comment. We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and find that: 1. There are no controversial items in the report within the realm of the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities. a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion and/or flooding within the project area. b. There is no Prime,State,Unique or Locally Important Farmland involved in the project area. c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs or Projects. We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by your committee: In review of the above application, we recommend an erosion control plan be included in overall plan to address wind and water erosion both during and after construction. We appreciate,the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. Sincerely, JSiTANLEY COOLEY Vice-President ''EXHIBIT- H gEP COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE . ft.�:w =+;Y�iY'PL1�`'+�- N• ,��n�-�"" ��rbz`•i�.rx"$ ''"�t?a�s<' ��`c" ``\ -- "`' West Fifth Street • San Bernardino, CA 92415-0450 • (714) 387-5940 VERNON G. KNOUREK Telecopier • (714) 387-5968 �fljl,� � Assistant Administrative Officer for Special Districts September 5, 1990 David Sawyer Community Development Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace,, CA 92324-5295 RE: TTM-90-04 IN RE: COUNTY SERVICE AREA 70, IMPROVEMENT ZONE H, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, ASSESSORIS1 PARCEL NO. 276-411-02, ASSESSMENT NO. 10-021 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Our records indicate the above referenced project, as identified by Assessor's Parcel No. 276-411-02, lies within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone H, Assessment District No. 1, has an unpaid special assessment levied against it. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66493 (d) the owner of the parcel that is being subdivided is required to cause the special assessment to be apportioned to the resulting parcels. In the alternative the owner may wish to prepay the assessment. Therefore, prior to recordation of the Final Map, proof of assessment apportionment or proof of assessment prepayment must be submitted to this agency. Please contact me at (714) 387-5829 if you have any questions. Ve ly "ours R VON AALD Staff Analyst Development Services Division Office of Special Districts a:grndtrce.ltr/5 EXHIBIT senol:.. :ti„rir:: ?_„RRI 1%JA . . . . . . . . .